Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB Study Session 2010-06-22 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 22, 2010 Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the TOWN BOARD of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in Rooms 202 & 203 in said Town of Estes Park on the 22nd day of June, 2010. Board: Mayor Pinkham, Mayor Pro Tem Levine, Trustees Blackhurst, Elrod, Ericson, Koenig and Miller Also Attending: Town Administrator Halburnt, Deputy Town Administrator Richardson, Town Attorney White, Directors Kilsdonk and Zurn, Manager Winslow, Finance Officer McFarland and Town Clerk Williamson Absent: None Mayor Pinkham called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. PROACTIVE COMMUNICATION. Trustee Elrod questioned whether communications with the Town Attorney by both the Board and the Town staff should be examined, and a gate-keeper established to ensure the attorney is only contacted when necessary. Board discussion followed: the attorney works for the Board and should be contacted when needed; a policy/procedure could be developed to established guidelines; the legal fees are reasonable; and department heads should contact the attorney when legal questions arise. Trustee Miller raised concerns with regard to how communications are handled. He stated a communication policy would outline how the Town handles issues such as Trustee correspondence. Trustee Koenig offered assistance in developing a policy. Mayor Pinkham requested Trustee Miller bring forward a list of concerns for the Board to discuss further. The general consensus of the Board was that staff has responded effectively to public inquires/communications. Trustee Elrod questioned if the Board should review the PIO duties and if the position was functioning as the Board envisioned. Trustee Blackhurst stated the position is dynamic and the details of the position change continuously. The position reports to Administration which determines the job description as the position moves forward. The Board discussed the development of agendas for Town Board and study sessions. The Board approves of staff sending the draft agendas for the Town Board’s review and comment. Trustee Elrod suggested a standing item on each study session could be the review/report of letters and responses to correspondence received by the Board. The Board reviewed the options available to provide the Board with Town email addresses, including a public server, laptops and software, clientless SSL or redirect estes.org email to the individual trustee email account. Several of the members were concerned with the possibility of viruses on their personal computers and the difficultly in receiving and responding to emails. Trustee Elrod stated utilization of the Town’s servers would protect the Town during an open records request. Attorney White informed the Board that the state statute does not address the retention of electronic communications of board members, and therefore, there would be no legal liability. POTENTIAL PROJECTS & ALTERNATIVE FUNDING OPTIONS. Town Administrator Halburnt presented the Board with a list of potential projects for the Board’s consideration at the upcoming pre-budget study session. The outcome of the review would be to identify projects that should remain and add any items the Board Town Board Study Session – June 22, 2010 – Page 2 would like to consider for the 2011 budget process. Trustee Miller questioned whether or not this process was recreating the CIP list that was established previously. The Board reached consensus on maintaining the following items for consideration in 2011: Multi Purpose Event Center (MPEC), indoor arena, transportation hub/civil site work, fairgrounds parking lot lighting and landscaping, permanent stall barn, replace barns T, U and V, renovate and relocate barn W, Bond Park master plan, Moraine Avenue streetscape and safety, museum storage facility, affordable housing/EPHA collaboration, street & drainage utility, SOPA performing art theater commitments, impact fees, Lot 4 usages and Highway 34 transit park and ride. Board comments are summarized: the MPEC could be an economic driver for the fall and winter months; a professional proforma should be completed for the MPEC and the arena; the board discussed the removal of the pedestrian crossing at Moraine and Wiest; downtown parking should be removed for 2011 and focus on the development of the transportation hub; parking could be added to the list in the future; Donut Haus intersection should be removed and readdressed at a later date; remove traffic flow realignment; questioned if the museum storage facility could be funded by the Friends of the Museum; land acquisition on Riverside Drive was a goal of a previous Board and should be removed; Historic Preservation would be discussed at an upcoming study session and should be removed; a comprehensive review should be completed for all Town owned property and discuss the best uses for the properties; Elkhorn Lodge redevelopment should be removed until such time as there is a new proposal to review; and a community center should be added to the list. Trustee Elrod suggested a public input process should be considered to allow the public a chance to comment and/or add items to the list of potential projects. The Board discussed the option and reached consensus that a public process should be used for the 2012 budget process. Trustee Blackhurst commented on the need to discuss the use of the Town’s reserves during the current economic times, and the need to review financing options to move the town forward. Trustee Miller stated the conversation would be worthy; however, he would have concerns with incurring debt without the vote of the electorate. Mayor Pinkham stated the Town should develop a bottom-line for the use of reserves as it relates to the current economic climate. There being no further business, Mayor Pinkham adjourned the meeting at 6:38 p.m. Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk