HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 2002-05-28 (2)Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, May 28,2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 28th day of May, 2002. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker David Habecker Lori Jeffrey-Clark G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: Trustee Gillette Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Mayor Baudek noted that Museum Director Kilsdonk, Ass't. Light and Power Director Mangelsen and he attended an Awards Dinner in Denver where six entities within the State were awarded Preservation Awards. Estes Park was an award recipient for the Fall River Hydro Plant Project. Praise was given to Museum and Light and Power Staff. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated May 14, 2002. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Works, May 16, 2002: 1. Phase 1, Fall River Trail Project, Design/Const. Mgt., Cornerstone Engineering, $28,046. 2. Glacier Water Plant Filter Media Material Purchase, WAACO, $25,468. 3. Phase 3, SCADA Irrigation System Material Purchase, L.L. Johnson, $24,309.66 B. Community Development, May 23,2002: Special Events: 1. Use of Bond Park, Park Ln., & Children's Park Parking Lot for Centennial Car Show 8/22/03. 4. Extension of Development Agreement for Wildfire Ridge from 6/11/02 to 12/31/02.
Board of Trustees - May 28,2002 - Page 2 Trustee Barker requested Item 3.A.1. (Fall River Trail Project) be removed from Consent for discussion, adding that he will Abstain from any vote on this item. Trustee Habecker stated that Item #3.B.1. (Use of Bond Park for the Centennial Car Show) was inadvertently placed on the Agenda for action. The Community Development Committee recommended approval of the event, with the venue to be reconsidered by the Committee at their June meeting. Trustee Doylen requested Item 4. (Wildfire Ridge Agreement Extension) be voted upon separately due to a potential Conflict of Interest. Thus, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Barker) Items #1, 2, 3A.2., and 3. be approved, and it passed with one Absent. Item 3.A.1. Phase 1, Fall River Trail Project. Mike Wallace, 1685 Fall River Rd., stated that he does not object to the trail, however: (1) he does not support a path 16' from the window in his house; (2) there are safety issues; (3) where does the Town intend to place the snow during snow removal operations?; (4) aware that four 6" diameter trees are being removed; private developers are required to "go around trees that are 4" diameter or larger." Public Works Director Linnane responded that: (1) Mr. Wallace's front yard is in the state's right-of-way and the Town is proposing the path within said right-of-way, and 18' from the right-of-way line. The trail width is 10'; there is 2' between the trail and the travel lane; and 18' to the right-of-way line. (2) CDOT and staff concur with the safety of the design, particularly with the addition of curb and gutter. Staff displayed a map of the area and confirmed that the trail will remain within the 18' parameter and avoid the Wallace property as much as possible. Any structure would not be allowed in, or, this close to right-of-way today. Director Linnane noted that a correction is needed on the drawing to indicate the distance of the trail from the right-of-way is 18 feet. Trustee Barker requested that the record be made clear that the trail will be designed as stated by Dir. Linnane, not as presented in the map displayed during this meeting. (3) the Town will minimize the impact of snow removal. (4) the trees in question are located in the state's right-of-way, as state requirements must be followed, staff cannot guarantee the trees will be replaced. Additional discussion followed, including mitigation and screening, with staff confirming that the Project will be phased (3) depending upon funding. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Newsom) the design and construction management for Phase I of the Fall River Trail Project with Cornerstone Engineering for $28,046 be approved, to include the trail map being redefined to correctly reflect the right-of-way distance, and further discussion to take place to attempt to mitigate concerns, and it passed with one Abstention and one Absent. Item 4 Extension of Development Agreement for Wildfire Ridge. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Habecker) this Agreement be extended from June 11 to December 31, 2002, and it passed with Trustee Doylen Abstaining, and one Absent. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. RESOLUTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH HB 01 S2-1006 - MANDATORY ADOPTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT MASTER PLANS - MOTION TO APPROVE. Community Development Director Joseph stated that Resolution 12-02 is in response to the passage of HB 01 S-1006 that requires certain counties and municipalities that have adopted master plans to comply with CRS 30-28-106 and 31-23-206. The resolution certifies compliance with the master plan requirement and inclusion of a recreational and tourism element
Board of Trustees - May 28,2002 - Page 3 of the master plan and must be adopted by January 8,2004. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Newsom) Resolution #12-02 be adopted, and it passed unanimously. 2. CBT PROJECT - COLORADO RIVER DISTRICT - REPORT. In a memorandum dated May 14, 2002, Town Attorney White briefed the Board on the Colorado River District and requested the Mayor be authorized to issue a letter to the Bureau of Reclamation supporting their stance on the continued historic operation of the Colorado Big Thompson Project, and opposing the position taken by the Colorado River Water Conservation District to alter the historic operation of the CBT Project. The Town is urging the Bureau to resist any attempts by the River District to alter said historic operation of the CBT Project as a reformatting of the operations that would most likely result in a reduction of the historic yield of the CBT Project. This reduction would severely impact the delivery of water to the residents of the Estes Valley. The Town's views should also be made known to state and local representatives. Discussion followed, and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Doylen) the Mayor be authorized to issue said letters as stated above, and it passed with one Absent. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. House Bill 1265 - Update on condominium conversion legislation. Town Attorney White provided an update and reviewed conversion parameters, B. New Board Room Open House. An open house celebrating the opening of the new Board Room is planned June 4~h from 4-6:00 p.m. Light refreshments, guided tours, and a commemorative favor for the first 100 guests will be offered. C. Regional Elected Officials Meeting. All Trustees were invited to attend this meeting in Milliken June 5th; useful and educational information will be presented on transportation. There being no further business, Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m. John Baudek, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 6,2002 Minutes of a Regulhr meeting of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 6th day of June, 2002. Committee: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Barker and Habecker Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Directors Hinze, Joseph, Thompson, Conference Coordinator Larsen, Clerk O'Connor Absent None Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Estes Valley Development Code - Code Revision Update. Director Joseph reported that the Planning Commission is reviewing two siOnificant sections of the Code: Sign Code and Highway Corridor Design Guidelines. Pursuant to the Town Board direction, staff is also submitting a proposal whereby the Multi- Family "use by right" in the A-Accommodations zoning district would be eliminated. Discussion followed on the highway corridor design guidelines, with staff confirming the proposal is being submitted on a "minimal level" that only addresses color and materials. Copies of the proposal are available, as well as an opportunity to discuss these issues personally. Staff confirmed that certain Sign Code definitions were omitted when the EVDC was adopted, and this error is being corrected with the revisions being proposed at this time. These corrections will retain the identical end result of the prior Sign Code. Building Department - Update. With the employment of a third Building Official (Bryan Horgen), productivity in the Building Dept. has improved tremendously. All of the bldg. officials are heavily involved in the International Bldg. Code, and with the developer's agreement, although not formally adopted by the Town, both of the large projects being developed by the Estes Park Housing Authority are being reviewed under the International Code. The projects do not face any jeopardy in using this Code as the Building Official does have authority to use an alternate code. Chief Building Official Birchfield could attend the next Committee meeting to provide additional information on this issue. The year-to-date building permit report indicates a total valuation of $9,504,990 for May, 2001 as compared to $8,245,239 in May, 2002. The statistics indicate a lag, however, there are a number of permits awaiting the payment of permit fees. Work on the Knoll Master Plan is also underway. MUSEUM DEPARTMENT. History Camp. Sr. Center Director reported that two sessions are planned: July 15-19 and August 5-9. The cost is $125/child; children must have just completed third or fourth grade; and scholarship funding is available. Registration forms are
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - June 6,2002 - Page 2 available at the Museum and at MacGregor Rahch. History Camp is sponsored by the Town, Friends of the Museum, MacGregor Educational Trust, the King Foundation, and the Lennie Bemiss Memorial Fund. Monthly Report. Programs scheduled through July 27th Were reviewed, as well as attendance statistics. SPECIAL EVENT DEPARTMENT. Centennial Car Show, August 22, 2003 - Request approval to use Bond Park, Park Lane, and Children's Park Parking Lot. At the May 23rd Committee meeting, the Committee approved ' this event scheduled August 22, 2003, however, staff was directed to canvass adjacent business owners to determine if this venue was appropriate. Special Events Director Hinze reported that she and Dick Brown personally contacted eight merchants, and, in summary, the majority supports the location. As previously stated, the Police and Parks Departments both favor the Municipal Parking Lot. Potential budget implications include repair to existing sod and the irrigation system in Bond Park. Norm Carver was present and he confirmed that many shows are open to the public and there are no additional security concerns at this time. Discussion followed on the "off peak" definition as contained in the Event Organizer Regulations, with staff confirming: "No new events will be given use of a Town-owned park on holiday weekends or during the summer tourist season." Reaching consensus that this event complies with the regulation as mentioned above, it is beneficial for both the event organizer and the Town's economy, Town-owned parks should be utilized and enjoyed, and the cost of any damage should be minimal, the Committee recommends approval of the yenue for this event as requested. Summer Rodeo Series. Director Hinze reported that this series kickoff was rd Monday, June 3 , 158 spectators were present, and 187 attended 6/5. Apprehension that a sufficient number of contestants would not participate have been alleviated. Staff has not received any sound complaints. Committee members were invited to inspect the newly-constructed Announcer's Stand, and grandstand upgrades in seating and lighting. MARKETING DEPARTMENT. Estes Park Film Commission. Marketing Director Pickering and staff gave a PowerPoint presentation reporting on requirements for certification as a state film commission. The Colorado Film Commission provides formal guidance and training to local community film contacts to certify them as professional liaison offices to aid in,the attraction and support of Motion Picture, Television, and Imaging Production in their respective areas. Conference Services Coordinator Larsen has received this formal training, and would serve as the Local Community Liaison Office (no additional staff is required), and the Department is seeking approval of the following: E Resolution establishing the formation of an Estes Park Film Commission as a resource used by the motion picture industry to facilitate filming in Colorado. k Total budget estimate is $3,000: Town funding in the amount of $1,500 from the Economic Development Fund (PRPA) to include a matching grant from the Chamber EPIC funds. > Appointment of at least 3 persons to serve on the Advisory Board, to include Marketing Director Pickering and a Chamber representative.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - June 6,2002 - Page 3 Discussion followed on anticipated responsibilities of the Commission, assessing filming opportunities to ensure organizers are credible, and the value and rational of the Commission's role in serving as an advocate for the support of Estes Park's economy. The Committee recommends: (1) approval of the Resolution as presented, (2) the funding request of $1,500 from Economic Development Funds, and (3) that Director Pickering submit a list of potential appointees (seven members) to include Director Pickering and the Chamber Resort Director, and a representative from the Town Board, Park Service, business community, for formal appointment during an upcoming Town Board meeting. Miscellaneous Activities. Director Pickering commented on the successful Colorado Tourism Office meeting hosted at the Conference Center, and commended Advertising Manager Marsh and Conference Coordinator Larsen for their outstanding work on the Lawn Lake Project. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 9:10 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 13-02 WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park, Colorado (the "Town") recognizes that Motion Picture, Television, and Imaging Production have the potential to be strong growth industries within the State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, businesses and individuals in Estes Park have benefited directly with the infusion of capital spent by these industries; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Legislature, recognizing the importance of these industries, established the Colorado Film Commission within the Governor's Office of Economic Development and International Trade, and has supported this endeavor since July 1, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Film Commission has encouraged the formation of local and regional Film Commissions and Community Film Contacts throughout the State; and WHEREAS, the Colorado Film Commission provides formal guidance and training to these local Community Film Contacts to certify them as professional liaison offices to aid in the attraction and support of Motion Picture, Television, and Imaging Production in their respective areas; and WHEREAS, the Estes Park Film Commission \s seeking recognition and support from the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO that the Board hereby recognizes, supports, and endorses the efforts by the Estes Park Film Commission to attract Motion Picture, Television, and Imaging Production to our area for the purposes of generating a good public image and to serve for the economic betterment of our communities. INTRODUCED, READ, AND PASSED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK on this day of ,2002. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk
Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) Special Board Meeting I)ate: April 8,2002 Members Present: Eric Blackhurst, Sue Doylen, Lee Kundtz, Jack Dinsmoor Members Absent: Karla Porter Staff Present: Sam Betters, Jean Michaelson, Staci Walker-Pence Others Present: Greg Rosener, Ron Gordon, Norm Carver Guests: The April 8th meeting of the Estes Park Housing Authority was called to order by Sue Doylen, Chairperson, at 8:35 a.m. via Teleconference between Estes and Loveland locations. DISCUSSION OF WILDFIRE RIDGE PURCHASE AGREEMENT The Board discussed and approved an extension on the purchase agreement for Wildfire Ridge. The purchase agreement was extended to April 22,2002. Karla Porter has requested additional title commitment coverage in the form of an Extended Coverage Form (ALTA), a Survey Endorsement, and CLTA Forms 103.1 and 103.3. US West currently has a Blanket Easement; the CLTA Forms 103.1 and 103.3 would provide protection relating to the easement held by US West. Sam requested a copy of the Utility Easement from Greg Rosener. At this time a decision was made not to sign the Operating Agreement. Karla and Sam believe the Operating Agreement does not clearly address whether or not the Manager or Partnership could pledge this property as collateral. A move to adjourn to Executive Session was made by Eric Blackhurst at 8:42a.m. This move was seconded by Jack Dinsmoor. This meeting adjourned from regular session at 8:42a.m. C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(a) To discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of real, personal, or other property interest. Topic of Discussion: Property Interest Matter to be Discussed: Same as above C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators. Topic of Discussion: Land Negotiation Matter to be Discussed: Same as above The regular session meeting was reconvened at 9:02a.m. to make a motion on Resolution #14. Resolution Discussion Resolution #14 EPHA April Board Minutes - Page 1 of 2
, Sue Doylen presdnted resolution #14. Thi sis a resolution approving the acquisition and purchase ofreal property described as LOT 1, WILDFIRE RIDGE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK IN THE COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. The resolution gives both Sue Doylen and/or Sam Betters authority to sign any and all documents pertaining to the acquisition and purchase of this property. Resolution Decision , A motion was made by Eric Blackhurst requesting approval of Resolution #14; this motion was seconded by Lee Kundtz. The motion passed approving Resolution #14. Further discussion was entered regarding the dog kennel currently located on the property. Sam Betters and Jean Michaelson Reed a copy of the Lease Agreement. Sam Betters and Karla Porter will work on an Estoppel Agreement. ADJOURN A move to adjourn to Executive Session was made by Eric Blackhurst at 8:42a.m. This move wasseconded by Jack Dinsmoor. This meeting adjourned from regular session at 8:42a.m. A motion was made to adjourn the meeting by Eric Blackhurst; Lee Kundtz seconded the motion to adjourn. The meeting adjourned formally adjourned at 9:26a.m. Respectfully submitted, Staci M Walker-Pence Loveland Housing Authority/Estes Park Housing Authority Executive Assistant EPHA April Board Minutes - Page 2 of 2
Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) Board Meeting I)ate: April 10,2002 Members Present: Eric Blackhurst, Sue Doylen, Lee Kundtz, Jack Dinsmoor Members Absent: Karla Porter Staff Present: Sam Betters, Jean Michaelson, Staci Walker-Pence, Rich Ekwall Others Present: Guests: Frank Lans, Michelle Jop, Mary Bauer, Ed Kitchen The April 10th meeting of the Estes Park Housing Authority was called to order by Sue Doylen, Chairperson, at 8:43 a.m. in Room 203 of the Municipal Building ofthe Town of Estes Park. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Sue Doylen asked if anyone had any changes, comments, or questions to the March 13th minutes. Sue entertained the motion to accept the minutes as amended, Eric Blackhurst moved to accept the minutes as amended and Lee Kundtz seconded the motion with the following changes to be rnade: Changes or amendments The Board requested clarification regarding the portion of the minutes relating to the verbal resolution for on-line banking with the Bank of Colorado. The correction to the March 13th minutes will reflect that this motion was approved, not suggested. Louise Olson made the motion to accept the resolution allowing on-line banking for the Loveland Housing Authority with the Bank of Colorado; Eric Blackurst seconded the motion to approve the resolution. Minutes Approved with amendment. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORTS - Cleave Street Financial statements for Cleave Street were handed out and reviewed at the meeting. The Board asked questions regarding funds available in the maintenance account. The response was that half of these funds are allotted for painting the exterior, carpeting the interior common areas, and also for a patio area in the rear. These items will be completed by year end. The Board asked a question regarding the line item: Financial Expenses/Other (Mortgage Interest) - why does this number fluctuate? The interest will change as the principal is reduced and also considering the number of days between payment dates. EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Pagel April 10,2002
- EPHA Management Company The Board reviewed the financial statements. Eric Blackhurst moved to approve both the financial statements for Cleave Street and EPHA Management Company; Lee Kundtz seconded the motion. Financials Accepted. COMMITTEE REPORTS Communications to Report I ¥ Sue Doylen read two letters written to the Board of Commissioners and the Housing Authority. 1. Beverly Briggs, Associates for Responsive Development. The letter stated high praise for the on-going efforts ofproviding affordable housing and housing that it is aesthetically pleasing in the community. 2. Louise Olson submitted a letter to Board of Commissioners thanking and praising the Board, Sue, Jean, and other members individually for their hard work,·commitment and dedicatioh. Ed Kitchen spoke regarding concerns of the bidding process for the Dry Gulch project. Cornerstone Engineering designed the project and bid on the infrastructure portion. The concern is that Cornerstone had more information available to them because they designed the project, ·thereby having an advantage over the other bidders, especially given the short response time. The Board listened to a description of the bidding procedure and decided efforts were made to be as fair as Assible given the short time-frame demanded to meet the project time-line. A closer review will be taken before the next development is bid out. A recommendation was to have.the engineer disclose whether or not they will be bidding on the project up-front. The Board asked Mr. Kitchen whether or not the information given to make bids on the project was adequate. Mr. Kitchen stated that it was adequate. Building Committee - Dry Gulch 26 Request for Proposals (RFP) were sent out, 19 contractors indicated they would bid the contract. The RFP was published in the local newspaper on two occasions; it was listed with regional plan clearing houses in Ft Collins, Denver, and Colorado Springs. We received 4 bids: Kitchen & Company, Estes $680,049.00 Cornerstone Engineering, Estes $687,915.00 Taylor Ball, Denver $834,134.00 Don Kehn Construction, Ft Collins $895,370.00 EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page 2 April 10,2002
EPHA originally bid estimate was placed at around $696,000.00. The Board stated that either of the Estes Park bidders should be able to successfully support these projects. Both companies are very reputable and should be able to do a good job. Colors for the exterior items of the Dry Gulch property were shown at the meeting. The current schema for the Dry Gulch property include cultured stone with a stacked look rather than grouted to edge. - The First floor with be a solid body stain - Canyon color with Douglas fur trim and siding. - The Second Floor will be a solid body stain - Sienna Sand color with Douglas Fir trim and siding. - The material used most closely to the roof-line will be a clear body stain applied to cedar. It was noted that newer materials are available with the stain pre-applied. The benefits are increased warranty, labor time savings reducing construction costs. Gutters will be brown and almond windows are preferable to white, if costs allow. Frank Lans, Lone Tree Manager, would like to volunteer his time to the Building Committee. He stated local contractors have a better working knowledge o f the sub-contractors in order to make the best decision on who will complete the work with both quality and price benefit. A motion to include Frank Lans as an advisory member for the Dry Gulch Apartment Building Committee was made by Lee Kundtz and seconded by Eric Blackhurst. The Board made a decision that Jack Dinsmoor will now be a voting member for the Dry Gulch committee as well. Discussion was continued regarding how the specifications are made to the contractor. Currently there are about 12 general contractors who would like to bid for the construction ofthis project. The RFP will be available next week (April 15th) and is anticipated to be released by Friday of next week (April 26m). The Board requested to review the RFP. The specifications in the RFP are produced by the architect along with his drawings. Amendments can be made after the fact if anything needs to be changed. This will prevent further delay in the RFP process. The bid packets are mailed out and handled through the Loveland Housing Authority Maintenance & Construction office. The next Building Committee meeting will include Dave Lingle (Architect). Dave will review the project and answer questions. REPORTS UPDATES & OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Sam Betters and Jean Michaelson presented the developments to the Colorado State Department of Housing (DOH). Two members from the Town were also present. The DOH Board gave unanimous approval on the request for $1.5 million towards the developments. The information provided and the overall support of the Town was instrumental to the DOH Board decision. The Board appreciates all the efforts made by Jean Michaelson on these projects and the efforts made by Norm Carver and Ron Gordon. This project has been a long a difficult acquisition but the Board is looking forward to the end result in the community and the future partnership that will be developed. EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page 3 April 10,2002
4. I Drv Gulch Contract Negotiation Decision A motion to enter into Contract Negotiations to award the Infrastructure Development Contract in the amount of$687,915 to Cornerstone Engineering was made by Eric Blackhurst; Lee Kundtz seconded the motion. Further claAfication was made that an alternate bid choice would be made in eveint that Cornerstone contract negotiations would fail. Sue Doylen called the motion to vote. Unanimous approval was given to award the contract for off-site and on-site infrastructure to Cornerstone Engineering. Rich Ekwall Will begin negotiations and the due diligence process. ADJOURN 1 Sue thanked non-Board attendees. A motion to go into Executiye Session was requested by Sue Doylen. Eric moved to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(a) and (e); Lee Kundtz seconded the motion. The following statutory citations were cited in reference to topic discussions in the Executive Session: C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(a) To discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of real, personal, or othet property interest. Topic of Discussion: Property Interest Matter to be Discussed: Same as above - C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators. Topic of Discussion: Land Negotiation ~ Matter to be Discussed: Same as above Themeeting adjourned at 9:46a.m. The EPHA Board reconvened regular session at10:10a.m. for a decision to award the Infrastructure Contract'as discussed. (See Dry Gulch Contract Negotiation Decision section) Lee Kundtz made a motion to re-adjourn regular session and Jack Dinsmoor seconded the motion. The meeting of the Estes Park Housing Authority regular session was formally adjourned at 10:12a.m. Respectfully submitted, Staci M Walker-Pence Loveland Housing Authority/Estes Housing Authority Executive Assistant EPHA Board Meeting Minutes PagE 4 April 10,2002
8//0/0/OPUBLISHINGIC>. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 4,2002,8:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Board: Chair Joe Ball, Members Jeff Barker, Judy Lamy, Wayne Newsom and Al Sager Attending: Chair Ball, Members Barker, Lamy, and Newsom Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott and Recording Secretary Williamson Absent: Al Sager Chair Ball called the meeting to order at 8:04 a.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1. CONSENT AGENDA The minutes of the May 7,2002 meeting were accepted as presented. 2. LOT 6, TEN BROOK RESUBDIVISION. LESS THE SOUTH 67.5 FEET; 350 VIRGINIA DRIVE. APPLICANT: WILLIAM BARLOW - VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 6.3.C.2 AND SECTION 4.3, TABLE 4-2 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Chilcott reviewed the requested variance. On March 5,2002 the Board of Adjustment gave conditional approval for a twenty (20) foot variance from the mandated twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback to allow for an addition to the existing house. A condition of approval was that Mr. Barlow would have a registered surveyor verify compliance with the variance and provide a setback certificate. Before Mr. Barlow purchased the property he hired England Surveying to locate the property corners. The initial survey showed the house to be five (5) feet from the north property linet On April 29,2002, he again hired England Surveying. During the sedond survey it was determined that the house was three (3) feet nine (9) inches from the north property line. In light of the new survey information, Mr. Barlow would like to request an additional two (2) feet from the original variance. He is requesting a twenty-two (22) foot variance from the mandated twenty-five (25) feet required. Applicant, Mr. Barlow, 350 Virginia Drive, owner of subject property, was present to answer questions. Chair Ball stated one of the corner stakes was bent under the ground and this could have thrown the measurements off. Member Barker is discouraged with the surveyors coming back with different measurements after surveying the same property. Engineers and surveyors need to be aware that the Board relies on these measurements to be accurate when making decisions that affect the property owners and the community. Member Lamy agrees with Member Barker's comments. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Lamy) to approve the variance request to allow for a twenty-two (22) foot variance from the mandated twenty-five (25) front yard setback to build an addition to the existing house three (3) feet from the property line and it passed unanimously, one absent, with the following conditions. All variances granted by the Board of Adjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commenced within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted.
BRACPOROPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 4,2002 Page 2 1. A registered land surveyor shall set the survey stakes for the foundatidn forms. After the footings are set and prior to pouring the foundation,the surveyor shall verify compliance with the variance and provide a setback certificate. 3. PARCEL NUMBER 3525121069, NE 1/4 SEC 25 T5N R73W, 221 E. RIVERSIDE DRIVE, APPLICANT: RICHARD D. SLAYDON & SANDRA PATTERSON-SLAYDON-VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTIONS 7.6.E.3 & 6.3.C.2 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Chair Ball read into record a letter from George Seifert giving notice that R.J. Miester will act as agent and manager for his property and be his representative during the Public meeting. Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance to the setback required per Section 7.6.IE.3 'Stream and River Corridors in the CD Zoning District" and Section 6.3.C.2. "Alteration/Extension of Nonconforming Structures Limited" of the Estes Valley Development Code. Specifically, this is a request for a nine (9) foot variance from the mandated twenty (20) foot river corridor setback to build eleven (11) feet from the river to expand/remodel the existing building. This includes adding a third floor, adding dormers to the second floor, converting a portion of the second floor deck into living space (a sunroom), and redesigning the exterior stairs to the second floor deck. The purpose of this expansion is to convert the first floor into *~ commercial space and the second floor into a dwelling unit. The existing two- story house was built in 1940 and is approximate14 twenty-four (24) feet'wide by thirty-five (35) feet long, with a foot print of approximately 840 square feet. It is setback approximately eleven (11) feet seven (7) inches from the Big Thompson River. This building falls within the Big Thomps6n River flood fringe. Roger Thorn has discussed this project with Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official, and is aware that the applicant needs to apply for and obtain a flood plain permit, in addition to a building permit, prior to construction. This is a small, narrow lot that ' leaves little room for expansion within the'setbacks. The lot size is 0.10 acres 0,312 square feet) and the lot depth varies from a maximum of 55 feet to a minimum of 37. With a twenty (20) foot river setback and an eight (8) foot front yard setback, the building width could vary from nine (9) feet wide to twenty- seven (27) feet wide Director Joseph stated that within the CD zoning district the'twenty foot (20) river setback can be reduced to ten (10) feet if there is public access or a store front. This does not apply to this property; however, it is worth stating that elsewhere in the CD district we see the reduction of the setback. Chair Ball stated the power lines are. very close to the top of the building currently. He expressed concern that the power lines niight be in the way if the building is built any taller. Planner Chilcott stated the Light and Power Department has not expressed a concern. Chair Ball also expressed a concern regarding the lack of parking. Planner Chilcott stated th@re is no parking requirement for the CD zoning district. Director Joseph suggested that if the Light and Power Department determines the power lines need to be relocated, that it would be done at the property owner's expense. R.J. Miester, manages property across the street at E. 220 Riverside, was present to answer questions. He stated he is going to become the property owner and does not feel that parking will be an issue. He believes there is plenty of parking nearby. ..
MRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 4,2002 Page 3 Public Comment: None. Based on staffs recommendation and the addition of condition 3 regarding the power lines, it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Barker) to approve the variance request to allow fora nine (9) foot variance from the mandated twenty (20) foot river setback, to expand/remodel the existing building eleven (11) feet from the river, and it passed unanimously, one absent, with the following conditions. All variances granted by the Board ofAdjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commenced within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted. 1. Compliance with the submitted plans. 2. A registered land surveyor shall verify compliance with this variance and provide a setback certificate. 3. Light and Power Department will review the location of the power lines and, if deemed necessary, the lines will be relocated at the owner's expense. 4. PARCEL NUMBER 2532305008, WEST QUARTER CORNER SEC 32, EAST HALF SEC 31, T5N, R72W, 1581 WINDHAM COURT, APPLICANT: DUANE & SHIRLEY BATCHMAN- VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 4, TABLE 4- 2 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance to Table 4-2 Side Setback for the "RE" District of the Estes Valley Development Code. This is a request for a thirty-nine (39) foot variance from the mandated fifty (50) foot side yard setback to build eleven (11) feet from the property line. Specifically, the applicant wishes to build a 640 square foot addition to their existing one-bedroom house originally built in 1920. The proposed addition includes a new kitchen and dining area, bedroom, and bath upstairs,with storage area below. The lot is undersized,.37 acres, for the "RE" zone, which has a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. The applicant purchased the lot in 1989, prior to the adoption of the EVDC. The side yard setback in place when the applicant purchased the property was five (5) feet. It is staffs opinion that this situation could not be mitigated through some method other than a variance. Applicants, Shirley and Duane Batchman, 1581 Windham Court, owners of subject property, were present to answer questions. Mr. Batchman stated the lot is an exceptionally small lot for the zoning district. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Barker/Lamy) to approve the variance request to allow for a thirty-nine (39) foot variance from the mandated fifty (50) foot side yard setback to expand/remodel the existing house eleven (11) feet from the property line., and it passed unanimously, one absent, with the following conditions. All variances granted by the Board of Adjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commenced within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted. 1. Prior to pouring foundation, submittal of a setback certificate prepared by a registered land surveyor. 2. Compliance with the submitted site plan.
BRADFOROPUBLISHING.0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 4,2002 Page 4 3. New construction shall be consistent in style, materials, and color of existing cabin. This should be addressed with the building permit submittal. 4. Compliance with Larimer County Building Department memo dated May 22,2002. 5. A deed restriction limiting the use of both parcels to one single-family residence shall be recorded prior to final building inspection. 5. PARCEL NUMBER 3527300005. SW 1/4 SEC 27, T5S, R73W: 2331 UPPER HIGH DRIVE, APPLICANT: WILLIAM & MAXINE PEEBLES - VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 4, TABLE 4-2 OF - THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance to Table 4-2 Side Yard Setback for the "RE" District of the Estes Valley Development Code. Specifically, the applicant wished to request a forty-one (41) foot seven (7) inch variance from the mandated fifty(50) foot front yard setback to build a detached three car garage eight (8) feet five (5) inches from the front property line. The lot is narrow for the zone district, and has a slope ranging from 30-55%. The lot is narrow for the "RE" zone- district, which has a minimum lot width of 200 feet. The area the applicant wishes to build in has a width of 130 feet. In order to satisfy the fifty (50) foot setbacks, the applicant would have to build the garage either uphill behind the house, requiring additional excavation work, or down the hill in front of the house, requiring foundation work that would be visible from a distance. It is staffs opinion these factors combine to create a special situation. Director Joseph asked the applicant how confident he is with the dimensions he is requesting and if the measurements could be verified by a professional surveyor. Applicant, Bill Peebles, 2331 Upper High Drive, owner of subject property, was present to answer questions. He stated that he wanted a 900 square foot garage but would settle for the proposed smaller version. He feels the garage that is durrently on the property is an eye sore and he would like to remove it. Member Newsom asked the applicant if the corner pins have been located. Mr. Peebles stated all four corner pins have been located. He is confident that a licensed surveyor will be able to verify the measurements. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Barker/Newsom) to approve the variance request to allow for a forty-one (41) foot se<ien (7) inch variance from the mandated fifty(50) foot front yard setback to build a detached three car garage eight (8) feet five (5) inches from the front property line and it passed unanimously, one absent, with the following conditions. All variances granted by the Board of Adjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commeticed within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted. 1. Prior to pouring foundation, dubmittal of a setback certificate prepared by a registered laftd surveyor. 2. Compliance with the submitted site plan. 3. Compliance with Larimer County Building Department memo dated May 20,2002. r
BRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 4,2002 Page 5 6. REPORTS None. There being no further business, Chair Ball adjourned the meeting at 8:45 a.m. Joe Ball, Chair Jacquelyn Williamson, Recording Secretary
MMADFOR' PUSLISHING.0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission May 21, 2002, 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Commission: Chair Cherie Pettyjohn, Commissioners Wendell Amos, DeeDee Hampton, Joyce Kitchen, Edward Pohl, Ed McKinney, and Dominick Taddonio Attending: Chair Pettyjohn, Commissioners McKinney, Kitchen, Pohl, Amos, Hampton and Taddonio Also Attending: Town Board Liaison Habecker, Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott and Recording Secretary Williamson Absent: None Chair Pettyjohn called the meeting to order at 1:32 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated April 16, 2002. b. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, LOT 1, SOLITUDE SUBDIVISION - Preliminary condo map withdrawn at the request of applicant. c. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, LOT 6, SOLITUDE SUBDIVISION - Preliminary condo map withdrawn at the request of applicant. d. REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 01-08, PARK RIVER WEST, LOT 1 & 2, PARK RIVER WEST SUBDIVISION, Applicant: Richard H. Wille Trust - Construction of a 68 unit multi- family condominium development, increase the FAR from 26.1% to 26.6%. e. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS, SHOPS AT RIVERWALK EAST CONDOMINIUM, LOT 1, AMENDED PLAT OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 2, MOUNTAIN MAN SUBDIVISION, Applicant: Ed Grueff - Condominiumize existing shops. 1. Submittal of a certificate by an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the State, certifying that the proposed owners association complies with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). 2. The final condominium map shall contain a surveyofs certification that the map contains all the information required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act. 3. A copy of the declaration and map shall be submitted to the Town within thirty (30) days of final plat approval. It was moved and seconded (Kitchen/Amos) that the Consent Agenda be accepted and it passed unanimously. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 02-03, EPCO, INC., LOT 1, EPCO SUBDIVISION, Applicant: Dennis K. Brown Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. This is a request by EPCO, Incorporated for a development plan to build eight (8) multi-family residential units in addition to the five (5) existing units on Lot 1, EPCO Subdivision. The site is located on the west side of MacGregor Avenue between Bond Park and Wonderview Avenue. The proposal includes a landscaping plan, paving existing dirt access drives, updating sanitary sewer and underground the electric lines, and providing a sidewalk along the west side of MacGregor Avenue. Darwin Williams of Cornerstone Engineering was present to answer questions.
IRADFOR/PUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - May 21, 2002 Page 2 It was moved and seconded (Amos/Taddonio) to recommend approval ofthe Development Plan 02-03, EPCO, Inc., Lot 1, EPCO Subdivision with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. Grading plan shall be submitted prior to application forfirst building permit, and shall meet the requirements set forth Section 7.2.B IGrading Standards" and Appendix D.VI "Erosion Control" of the Estes Valley Development Code. The grading plan shall include details on the phasing of the project in terms of site disturbance and revegetation. 2. Final stormwaterdesign shall be submitted priorto application for first building permit, and shall be subject to approval by Public Works. 3. An imp~rovement agreement providing for installation of all Code required site improvements shall be submitted priorto application forfirst building permit, and shall be subject to review and approval by Town Attorney White. 4. This proposal shall comply with Section 7.8.G.1.c "Fencing" and 7.5.H "Fences and Walls" prior to issuance of first building permit. 4. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, MILES COTTAGES CONDOMINIUMS, LOT 1, OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 1 HARTLAND SUBDIVISION, Applicant: John & Sue Baptista Chair Pettyjohn excused herself as Chair and from discussion and voting due to a conflict of interest; therefore, DeeDee Hampton acted as Chair. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. This request would convert an existing accommodati6ns complex at Miles Cottages to residential units. The property is zoned "A" Accorrimodations. Multi-family dwelling is a use by right in the "A" district; therefore, the proposed conversion complies with land use standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code. Currently, the motel has 19 units. The project will combine several of the units resulting in 14 residential units with full kitchens. No additional floor area is being proposed, only interior remodels. The site does not meet current ISO standards. Fire Chief Dorman recommends the site meet these standards. Public Works has requested water service lines be brought to current standard, the applicant has submitted a 'request for exception" from water standards. No other significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Bill Van Hom of Van Horn Engindering was present to represent the applicant. He stated the property would retain the same function and therefore, the demand on public service would remain the same. He also stated the demand would decrease due to the 25 percent decrease in the numberof units. There is no evidence or calculations to prove the public services are not adequate. Mr. Van Horn stated this is not a change in use. This property has not been used strictly for nightly accommodations; during the winter, rooms are rented on a monthly basis and there have been no complaints regarding public services. The applicant is willing to correct the interconnection of the water lines. The upgrade of public service will place a burden on the property owners. The requirement foran additional fire hydrant to meet today's ISO standards is not a reasonable request. The owners could understand the request for an additional hydrant if therewas going to be an increase number of units. Bill Linnane, Public Works Director, stated that the standards would require the 9 multi-family units on the north to have a 116 inch service line. The Public Works Department would allow 2- 3% inch service lines. The 5 units on the south are currently served by a % inch line and the Water Department is recommending a 1 inch line be installed. The Water Department receives numerous complaints when more than 3 dwelling units are on a % inch service line. Director Linnane believes there will be problems in the future with 5 dwelling units on a % inch line. Commissioner Amos asked for clarification on line size versus flow rate. Director Linnane and Bob Goehring clarified the differences. Mr. Van Hom reiterated this project would decrease the numberof units and therefore decrease the demand. It is the applicant's position that the current % inch line is serviceable and does not require upgrade. Commissioner Amos informed the applicants that during the study session there was discussion as to whether or not the buildings would meet the International Fire Code, if we had one. He
IRADFOROPUOLISHING.0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - May 21, 2002 Page 3 stated our building code does not allow the commission to require owners to update buildings too current fire standards. He suggested they take this information into consideratioh for the future purchasers. Public Comment: Larrry Carpenter, adjacent property owner south of unit 10, is happy with the current use of the property. He has concerns regarding the future use of the open space and fencing. John Baptista, applicant, stated there will be no additional construction and the open space will remain open. The fence will remain open for the elk and the deer to move through. At today's interest rates, the units would be available at a lower rate than rentals in town. Director Joseph questioned if there would be provisions in the covenants to bar future owners from expanding their units. Attorney White advised the owner of the condominium would own the air space and no future development rights are being reserved. Commissioner Amos asked for clarification regarding the Town Board recommendation for adequate Public Services. Director Joseph advised that the Town Board stated we will hold to the standards ofthe code. In this case it would be the ISO fire standard. Attorney White read the code requirement pertaining to domestic water service. Public hearing was closed. It was moved and seconded (McKinney/Kitchen) to eliminate the requirement for an upgrade from a % inch line to a 1 inch line, and it failed. Kitchen, Hampton, and McKinney voting yes. Taddonio, Amos, and Pohl voting no. Commissioner Pohl stated he has concerns regarding fire conditions that might currently exist, such as, a lackof fire walls between each unit and the large open attic space. This should be a concern of the current owners and the future owners of these units. Commissioner McKinney agreed with Commissioner Pohl's comments. He stated there was a consensus during the study session regarding the potential for fire in these units. The Planning Commission would like to see the owners take this matter into consideration. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Pohi) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Preliminary Condominium Map, Miles Cottages Condominiums, Lot 1, Amended Plat of Lot 1 Hartland Subdivision with the following conditions, and it passed 6-0. Taddonio, Hampton, Amos, Kitchen, McKinney, and Pohl voting yes. Pettyjohn abstaining. 1. Compliance with Town Attorney White's memo dated April 29,2002, concerning labeling of general common areas and adequate public utilities. 2. Compliance with Public Works Director Linnane's memo dated April 25, 2002, concerning water line replacement. 3. Compliance with Upper Thompson Sanitation District's memo regarding plant investment fees and replacement of service lines. 4. Submittal of a certificate by an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the State, certifying that the proposed owners association complies with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). 5. The final condominium map shall contain a surveyor's certification that the map contains all the information required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act. 6. Acopy of the declaration and map shall be submitted to the Town for recording within thirty (30) days of final plat approval. 7. ISO standards shall be met and water service lines shall be installed or guaranteed prior to recording of condominium map. It was moved and seconded (Amos/McKinney) to recommend to the Town Board and County Commissioner to adopt the International Fire Code. Taddonio, Hampton, Amos, Kitchen, McKinney, and Pohl voting yes. Pettyjohn abstaining.
BRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - May 21,2002 Page 4 REPORTS Staff Review: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 02-14, Lot 1, Solitude Subdivision DEVELOPMENT PLAN 02-15, Lot 6, Solitude Subdivision Commissioner Pohl stated he would like to see these Development Plans. He has concerns regarding recommendations the Commission made to the earlier lots. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 3:20 p.m. Cherie Pettyjohn, Chair Jacquelyn Williamson, Recording Secretary fc@ ,
Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Bob Joseph Date: June 6,2002 Subject: Shops at Riverwalk Preliminary and Final Condominium Map Background. This is an application to \ condominiumize existing shops located on the - \ EGG riverwalk along East Elkhorn Avenue. The AND building was constructed last summer, and a condominium map was filed with the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder without proper B-apum FI i 5 Planning Commission and Town Board review. The applicant now requests formal / Epi approval from the Planning Commission. CAN=NA Town Attorney White suggests the applicant explain to the Board why the condominium map was filed without proper review and approval as required by the EVDC. -~ xe:330 Budget. N/A Action. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Shops at Riverwalk Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Submittal of a certificate by an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the State, certifying that the proposed owners association complies with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). 2. The final condominium map shall contain a surveyofs certification that the map contains all the information required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act. 3. A copy of the declaration shall be submitted to the Town within thirty (30) days of final plat approval.
Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo TO: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Bob Joseph, Director and Alison Chilcott, Planner I Date: June 6,2002 Subject: Final Condominium Map - Supplemental Map #1 to the Plat (Map) of Sunset Ridge Condominiums Background. This is a final condominium map application for the Supplemental Map #1 to the Plat (Map) of Sunset Ridge Condominiums. The site is located at the corner of Virginia Drive and Big Horn Drive. Sunset Ridge of Estes Park Condominium Association, Inc. was created with the condominium map and declaration recorded in January, 2002 after the Town Board's January 8, 2002 condominium map approval. The map approved on January 8th condominiumized two of the eight units planned for the site. This map condominiumized two additional units. Location Map Budget. None. Wonderview Ave \ Action. Approval. 7- Vwmnu nr E-1 --JI E I .4 i••1 i--7 : _£.11_ 1·__ .1 31 1 1 L 2-4 -,1.i- L -1. . 0
Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Bob Joseph Date: June 6,2002 Subject: Miles Cottages Condominium Conversion (Preliminary and Final Maps) Background. This condominium project is the conversion of an existing accommodations complex at Miles Cottages. The applicant proposes low cost housing. Because the applicant does not propose any density ~3 1, 1-71 = l j- .: -1 e bonuses, the low-income 142:.4 -I-1 housing proposal does not fall ' J ; 1/ 1 ! 77.-t.-:E f s 1 4- O within review or jurisdiction of the 4140 .14 1 4 0 1 Fal .44? tls U Town Board; the owners are P*Wi 1 430..... . providing this on their own merit „ „ I.13 '·~ . i. :.:I:.·610 $6•e 1 5 iii and the Town has no authority to t=»#LL 01 administer. No additional floor '|'*1"|'*| ~ 1,1:Mult*| r area is being proposed, only € 1 - i--1-, 1 1-10 ".Int.ti* ~ interior remodels. Pertinent 1.0.1.-_1: ~ -- issues include water services line . 1,1- * + A . 1.1,01,1, ,€=ME€Kl replacement and fire hydrant 299,4.-M>J I 1 1 41 -#imug=cUl installation. Budget. N/A Action. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Miles Cottages Preliminary Condominium Map CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Compliance with Town Attorney White's memo dated April 29, 2002, concerning labeling of general common areas and adequate public utilities. jilii ViI: ¢ IN r.· N .o)
2. Compliance with Public Works Director Linnane's memo dated April 25,2002, concerning water line replacement. 3. Compliance with Upper Thompson Sanitation District's memo regarding plant investment fees and replacement of service lines. 4. Submittal of a certificate by an attorney, duly licensed to practice,law in the State, certifying that the proposed owners association complies with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). 5. The final condominium map shall contain a surveyofs certification that the map contains all the information required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act. 6. A copy of the declaration and map shall be submitted to the Town within thirty (30) days of final plat approval. 7. ISO standards shall be met and water service lines shall be installed or guaranteed prior to recording of condominium map. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Miles Cottages Final Condominium Map CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Submittal of and compliance with a revised Preliminary Condominium Map. 2. Sheet 2 shall contain unit numbers on cross section B-B', C-C, D-D', E-E', and Section FrE'. Also, the bottom half of unit,1 shall be designated as "unit 1" (comments from Town Attorney White). •Page 2
Prepared 06/05/02 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, June 11, 2002 7:00 p.m. AGENDA E--1 Presentation of Plague to Linda Hinze recognizing Connie Boschen for exemplary service as the founding coordinator of the Town's Annual "Come Catch the Glow" Christmas Parade from 1989 through 2001. PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated May 28,2002. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, June 6,2002: Special Events Dept.: 1. Centennial Car Show Venue Approval (Bond Park, Park Lane, Children's Park Parking Lot), August 22,2003. Marketing Dept.: 1. Formation of the Estes Park Film Commission: Resolution 13-02, and Funding. 4. Estes Park Housing Authority, Special Meeting April 8, 2002 and Regular Meeting April 10,2002 (acknowledgment only). 5. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, June 4,2002 (acknowledgement only). 6. Estes Valley Planning Commission, May 21, 2002 (acknowledgement only). l A. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek open the Public Hearing(s). If the Town Board, Applicant(s), Staff or the Public wish to speak on a particular item, a formal Public Hearing will be conducted as follows: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Public Testimony D. Mayor - Close Public Hearing E. Motion to Approve/Deny 1 Continued on reverse side
1. CONDOMINIUM MAP. Shops at Riverwalk East, Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps, 2. CONDOMINIUM MAP. Supplemental Final Condominium Map #1, Sunset Ridge. 3. CONDOMINIUM MAP. Miles Cottages Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps, Lot 1, Amended Plat of Lot 1, Hartland Subdivision, John and Sue Baptista/Applicants. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. APPOINTMENT TO THE ESTES PARK URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY. Replacing Steve Jackson, 5-yr. term, expiring 09/14/04. 2. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. . 3. ADJOURN. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 2
. 1' 1 1 1 1 1 /9 L_J--1 1 -I.'i_ 1 ' I I 1 <. / F - -'7 #-Lf-- { .9XX- 8\.1.- Golt Course Road 330 rj , 1-1 i 0 F. 11 a 9 f 1 -3 4 7 1 1 \4 1 L_ 49 /3 1 ..1 \ # 1 1[-fl.--1 9- 4 \ --T- 1 6- 11 1 23 \\11 0--- -7 rl EN-- -] f ~ U-1- 7 1 1»(7,0 4 1 91--7 X i 1-1 fv -- rj - )1 - 49-1\ , 5- -1 11 ) 9-9 ~ 1 jnch equals 150 feet 0-1\ ,-1 11] 9 -_L:10--3- (\ I. l 1. \ ~ 1 | M iLE, 1-1 0 ~» f«» Fl-22] ___________Pine Knoll Drive ~~~- < f| | Mal.ES |~ 3 0 0 11 r X 1 -i- (-1k--2-1 7-1 7-1---3 1 1 L.. L <-1 L _-5-3 1 L--ra 1 / WI 1--7'/ 1 1 1. L---tly,->e Holiday Lane ~_~~ \\ P- 4\ - 1 L/- ·· k 1 1 ~ A 3 «---f» · /-\\- i,1 -L-1- :7 5 1 l #--j , L 33=55-7 \\«« i - 41 i )/2/4 1 f 1 - f U (2