HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 2002-05-14Prepared 05/09/02 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, May 14, 2002 7:00 p.m. New Board Room #1 AGENDA DEDICATION and INVOCATION OF NEW BOARD ROOM FATHER PAUL GARRETT, President Estes Park Interfaith Council PROCLAMATION - Mayor Baudek present Proclamation for FOSTER CARE MONTH to Phyllis Stoner, etal/Larimer County Dept. of Human Services. PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated April 23,2002. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, April 25,2002: Museum Dept.: 1. Car Show Committee request to use Bond Park July 4th: Changed location from Bond Park to the Town's Public Works Building/Hwy. 34 - SEE MEMO FROM SPECIAL EVENT DIRECTOR HINZE. B. Public Safety, May 2,2002. C. Light & Power, May 9,2002: 1. Causeway Conduit Repairs, R. C. Heath, $14,154.00. 2. Fall River Hydro Plant Pedestrian Trail Scope of Services, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, $9,850.00. 4. Estes Park Housing Authority, March 13, 2002. (acknowledgment only). 5. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, May 7,2002(acknowledgement only). 6. Estes Valley Planning Commission, April 16, 2002 (acknowledgement only). 7. Resolution #11-02 CDOT & Town Causeway/Fish Creek Intersection Project. lA. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek open the Public Hearing(s). If the Town Board, Applicant(s), Staff or the Public wish to speak on a particular item, a formal Public Hearing will be conducted as follows: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Public Testimony 1 Continued on reverse side
D. Mayor - Close Public Hearing E. Motion to Approve/Deny 1. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT. Lots 2 and 3, Ten Brook Resubdivision, Stephen P. Chamberlain/Applicant. Correct existing encroachment (Continued from April 9,2002). 2. SPECIAL REVIEW. Lot 1, Mary's Lake Subdivision, Rocky Mountain Church/Applicant. Construction of a structure to house worship, office and gathering functions. 3. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, Lot 2, Solitude Subdivision, Fish Creek Properties, LLC/Applicant. Construction of 10 overnight accommodation cabins. 4. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, Lot 3, Solitude Subdivision, Fish Creek Properties, LLC/Applicant. Construction of 7 overnight accommodation cabins. 5. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, Lot 4, Solitude Subdivision, Fish Creek Properties, LLC/Applicant. Construction of 7 overnight accommodation cabins. 6. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, Lot 5, Solitude Subdivision, Fish Creek Properties, LLC/Applicant. Construction of 5 overnight accommodation cabins. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: NEW HOTEL & RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FILED BY JOSE "TRINI" GONZALES-RUIZ, dba CASA GRANDE MEXICAN RESTAURANT. 210 E. Elkhorn Ave., Units 206 and 220: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing and review procedure B. Town Clerk - Present Application C. Mayor - Status of communications, evidence, Town Board comments/questions. D. Public Testimony E. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary) F. Mayor - Close Public Hearing G. Town Board Findings and Motion to Approve/Deny 2. FRIENDS OF STANLEY HALL AGREEMENT - MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY. Town Administrator Widmer. 3. EMPLOYEE HOME OWNERSHIP PROGRAM - MOTION TO APPROVE/DENY. Assistant Town Administrator Repola. 4. APPOINTMENT OF JOAN L. SAPP TO THE KNOLL CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COUNCIL. Mayor Baudek. 5. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. 6. ADJOURN. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 2
WHEREAS, foster parents provide a vital service as a source of nurturing and support by assisting infants, children and youth in reaching their full potential; and WHEREAS, foster parents provide safe, secure and stable homes to abandoned, abused and neglected children and youth; and WHEREAS, foster parents open their hearts and homes to children whose families are in crisis playing a vital role in helping children and families heal and reconnect; and WHEREAS, foster parents assist youth through on-going support and guidance to prepare for adult life; and WHEREAS, there are numerous individuals who work to increase public awareness of the needs of children in and leaving foster care as well as the enduring and valuable contribution of foster parents. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park proclaim the month of May 2002 as FOSTER CARE MONTH in the Town of Estes Park, and urge all citizens to volunteer their talents and energies on behalf of children in foster care, and the foster families who care for them, during this month and throughout the year. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused this seal to be affixed. John Baudek, Mayor Attest: April 11, 2002
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 23,2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 23rd day of April, 2002. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W. Gillette David Habecker Lori Jeffrey-Clark G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: None Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS None. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated April 9,2002. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, April 11, 2002: 1. Vehicle Purchase, $22,000 - Estes Park Auto Mall 4. Resolution #9-02 - Set public hearing date of May 14, 2002 to consider New Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License application filed by Casa Grande Mexican Restaurant, 210 E. Elkhorn Ave. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the consent agenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. l A. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek stated he would open a Public Hearing if the Town Board, Applicant(s), Staff or the Public desires to speak on the following item:
T , Board of Trustees -April 23,2002 - Page 2 1. CONDOMINIUM MAP. Final Condominium Map, Victorian Antlers, Lot 2, Block 1, Lone Pine Acres Subdivision, Bradley & Eunice Witt/Applicants. As there were no persons wishing to address this item, it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Habecker) the Victorian Antlers Final Condominium Map be approved, contingent upon Items 1-4 as described in the Staff Report dated April 19, 2002, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK - PRESENTATION OF ELK MANAGEMENT STUDY. RMNP Representative Czarnowski commented that this presentation will update the Board on research dealing with elk and vegetation management. The Park has made no decisions at this time; full and open public participation is mandated and will be followed; and, any decisions will be made on the best available science; and the Park desires involvement of major adjacent landowners and the Forest Service, DOW, and the Towns of Estes Park and Grand Lake. Mr. Czarnowski introduced Therese Johnson who gave the presentation that reviewed timeline, vegetation conditions, elk viewing, human-elk conflicts, wildlife viewing in Town, and chronic wasting disease. In conclusion, the "Adaptive Management Approach" was reviewed. Trustee questions and/or comments included: elk impact to other species; confirmation that RMNP contains the highest density not population of elk; resultant impact when predators are eliminated; confirmation that this type of Official Management Plan is used nationally; the Park's interim plan for removal of deer and elk for those animals affected by chronic wasting disease; statistics that the elk herd in RMNP was verified as "quite healthy"; request that the RMNP use discretion in making assumptions relative to development and its "perceived" negative impact to the eli<-Ms. Johnson stated results obtained thus far do not suggest development is hindering elk; counting methodology; property rights; and hunting. Audience comments were heard from Brian Johnson. In summary, the Board expressed their support of the process, including Town representation as an equal partner, and trust that political concerns should not override the science. Mayor Baudek expressed the Board's appreciation to the RMNP for their report. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: ADOPTION OF NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. 2002 EDITION, ORDINANCE #4-02. Mayor Baudek opened the public hearing, and Light and Power Director Matzke briefed the Trustees on adoption of the National Electric Code (published every three years). The Municipal Code currently requires that commercial wiring be installed in metallic conduit except for freestanding structures served byone electric meter in the Commercial Outlying (CO) Zone. Staff is recommending the Municipal Code be revised to extend the exception of freestanding structures served by one electric meter in all zoning districts except the Downtown Commercial (CD) Zone. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #4-02. Clarification followed on the requirement of wiring in conduit, and how electricail inspections during the interim period between when the Town and State individually adopt the Code. As there were no persons offering testimony, Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Jeffrey-Clark) Ordinance #4-02 for the adoption of.the National Electric Code, 2002 Edition be approved, and it passed unanimously.
Board of Trustees -April 23,2002 - Page 3 3. SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION - ESTES VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT. Town Clerk O'Connor presented said application and explained that the Municipal Code authorizes administrative approval of special event permits contingent upon there being no protests. In his letter dated April 17~ LaRoy Seaver urged the Board to deny the application based on the inappropriateness of a public tax-supported agency requesting a liquor permit and that this request offends the public image of the community. Library Director Volz reported that a Wine & Cheese Party is planned May 4~h to celebrate completion of the expansion to the Library. If need be relative to minors, staff will check IDs. There were no liquor incidents with the Library's previous permit. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Habecker) the Special Event Liquor Application submitted by the Estes Valley Public Library District be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. APPOINTMENTS TO KNOLL CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COUNCIL. Mayor Baudek requested the following be appointed: • 3 Citizens-at-Large - Bud Hampton, Jacque Oldham, and Tobi Hale • 3 Town Staff Personnel - Bob Joseph/Chairman, Bill Linnane and Betty Kilsdonk • 1 Downtown Business Representative - Kelly Brown • 1 League of Women Voters Representative - Louise Lindsey • 1 Town Trustee - Lori Jeffrey-Clark • 1 EPURA Representative - Wil Smith, Exec. Dir. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) the appointments listed above be approved, and it passed unanimously. 5. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Resolution #10-02 - Purchase of 100 acre-feet of Colorado-Big Thompson Project water. Town Attorney White reported on an Agreement to purchase said water from the NCWCD for $10,000/unit, for a total expenditure of $1,000,000. The contract was negotiated pursuant to direction from the Public Works Committee. The price is under-market and Attorney White is recommending approval. The Resolution authorizes the Mayor and Town Clerk to execute the Temporary Use Permit. Town Attorney White requested authorization to execute the Agreement when prepared. Stating that the purchase is a sound investment, the purchase price/unit is favorable, funding is provided by developer water rights fees, and confirming that this pro- active approach is not being taken pursuant to a shortage of water, it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) Resolution #10-02 be approved, including authorization of Town Attorney White to execute the Agreement, and the motion passed unanimously. B. Friends of Stanley Hall Agreement. Town Administrator Widmer presented said Agreement, and provided background information. Approval will be considered at the May 14~h Town Board meeting. $475,000 in FOSH funds are available for transfer to the Town. In brief, the Town may use the funds as partial funding for the design and construction of a facility for the presentation of performing arts. The term of the Agreement is four years; however, should the Town determine that a facility is not feasible, two options have been included: donate the funds to any non-profit organization whose primary focus is within the Estes Valley and whose non-profit purpose involves the performing arts. If the Town determines that here is no appropriate organization, the Town may donate the funds to an organization located
Board of Trustees -April 23,2002 - Page 4 within the Northern Colorado area. Administrator Widmer requested the Town Board submit any comments/revisions as soon as possible. C. Sales Tax Report. Compared to 2001, February revenues are down 10%, and year-to-date revenues are down 7.7%. This is the worst first quarter in over 15 years, thus capital projects not yet purchased or ericumbered have been placed on hold for the next 3 months. A list of potential additional budget cuts equal to 5% to cover the deficit has been requested from Dept. Heads. Trustees Habecker and Barker requested the advertising budget remain as originally approved, and perhaps augmented. D. Town Board Room Remodeling Project. Construction is nearing completion, and the next Board Meeting (May 14~h) should take place in the new Board Room. Mayor Baudek reflected on the numerous and varied business dealings conducted in the current Board Room. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting at 8:31 p.m. John Baudek, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk
MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees FROM: Special Events Department - Linda Hinze DATE: May 7,2002 ,-% -- SUBJECT: -Estes Park Area Historical Muse-uni-- Cdolest Ar Show in 68l&rado - Reqi,Avt tn i ice Bond Park - At the Community Development Meeting on April 25,2002, the Friends of the Museum had requested use of Bond Park for their Coolest Car Show in Colorado to be held on July 4th. Due to the Trustees discussion and staff concerns at the meeting, the applicants decided not to pursue the use of Bond Park. They have asked for and been granted permission to use the parking areas around the Town's Park Department Building on Hwy 34.
. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 25,2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 25th day of April 2002. Committee: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Barker and Habecker Attending: All Absent None Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Directors Hinze, Joseph, Kilsdonk, Manager Marsh, Sr. Center Director Thompson, Chief Building Official Birchfield, Deputy Clerk - van Deutekom Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. MUSEUM. A. Bond Park Special Event Request - Julv 4*. Due to Government security procedures at the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Power Plant on Lake Estes, Director Hinze explained that event organizers from the "Coolest Car Show in Colorado" cannot return to the BOR parking lot for their July 4th event, thus they are requesting the use of Bond Park. The Car Show Committee has investigated the use of several areas in town and Bond Park appears to be the best location. The Car Show Committee is requesting use of the following: 1) Bond Park on July 4th from 6:00 am until 4:30 pm; 2) portable fencing; 3) transportation station on the south side of the Municipal Building; and 4) to close MacGregor Ave. from Park Ave. to Elkhorn Ave. Norm Carver/Car Show Committee noted that this is a major monermaking event for the Museum and explained that the event must be visible to the public to be successful. 125 vehicles are anticipated and 90 would be parked on the grass in Bond Park. Director Hinze noted that Event Organizer Regulations approved at the February 13, 2001 Board of Trustees meeting state: "No new events will be given use of the park on holiday weekends or summer tourist season." If this event is approved, the Trustees must waive regulations regarding use of Bond Park on a holiday. The Police Dept. opposes the closure of Elkhorn Ave. to Park Ave. due to holiday traffic and the Dept. is unable to provide an officer for traffic control for this specific site. The Parks Dept. opposes the use of Bond Park due to expected damage to the sod plus the potential of broken irrigation equipment. Sybil Barnes/Museum Advisory Board questioned whether the Bob's Amoco site downtown was available. Following a vote of 2-1 denying, the request, the this item will be submitted as an action item on the May 14 Town Board agenda. B. Museum Advisory Board Determination. Director Kilsdonk reported that following substantial discussion, the Museum Advisory Board has elected to ask the Mayor and Trustees whether or not the Advisory Board should continue to exist in its present incarnation. Director Kilsdonk presented a letter from Susan
41 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - April 25,2002 - Page 2 Harris, Secretary of the Advisory Board that provided a brief history of the Board and current concerns. Sybil Barnes/Museum Advisory Board expressed appreciation to the Town for its support of the Museum. The Committee recommends that the Museum Advisory Board continue to exist and that it should 1) redefine its role, and 2) fill the 3 vacancies on the Advisory Board. C. Report. February and March attendance and admission graphs were presented. D. Fall River Hvdro Electric Plant Internship - Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) Funding. The hydro plant will open on July 15, 2002 and PRPA has agreed to undenwrite a seasonal interpreter ($1,000) to assist with the required staffing hours in 2002. The Committee endorses PRPA's agreement to underwrite a seasonal interpreter at the Fall River Hydro Electric Plant as outlined above. ADVERTISING. Manager Marsh reported on the following May magazine ad awards: 1) Child Magazine editors awarded RMNP as one of the top 10 National Parks in the country; 2) Familv Fun Magazine readers voted Estes Park as a the top tourist destination in the mountain/plains region; and 3) National Geoaraohic Adventure listed RMNP as one of America's 10 favorite parks. Total requests for information are down 5.29%, e-mailed requests are up 19.27% and 800 calls are down 24.37%. Other areas discussed include upcoming ads, the RRC Conversion Study, and an upcoming test pilot Estes Park "web-mercial.' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING RE-ORGANIZATION. A. Assistant Administrator Repola reported that in 2001 a rotating calendar was adopted for departments that report to this Committee. In the interest of promoting committee meetings that are focused and efficient, staff is proposing to further refine the meeting schedule. Given that the Advertising, Conference Center and Special Events departments provide visitor-related services, there is substantial overlap of activity and effort between these departments. Therefore, dedicating every other month to this group provides an agenda that is focused on visitor-oriented services and their role in the Town's organization. Conversely, the Community Development, Museum and Senior Center departments would comprise the other half of committee business, thus this meeting would contain a diverse agenda. This schedule does not preclude the appearance of a department during an off-month meeting if necessary. The Committee recommends approval of the rotating schedule as submitted. Staff was directed to determine the most appropriate day/week for Community Development Committee meetings and present a recommendation at the May meeting. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Chief Building Official Birchfield reviewed Chapter 1, Sections 105-112 of the 2000 International Building Code®. Specific areas discussed include the Board of Appeals, permits, submittals, and fees.
, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - April 25,2002 - Page 3 SENIOR CENTER. A. Sr. Center Director Thompson presented the Senior Center Activity Report detailing statistics for sign-ins, meals, and types of activities. Staff is currently reviewing access to the Center by user groups. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 10:05 a.m. pdaa. Aztin Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, May 2,2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 2nd day of May 2002. Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Jeffrey-Clark and Newsom Attending: All Absent None Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Fire Chief Dorman, Police Chief Richardson, Police Detective Rose, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS M26 Advanced Taser Presentation. Detective Rose presented a report and demonstration on the M26 Advanced Taser, a tool for less than lethal arrest control that provides a greater opportunity to reduce or eliminate excessive force, lethal force, and injury to suspects. The total cost to purchase seven 26-watt Tasers, battery chargers, batteries, and computer software is $3,711.55. The Committee endorses the use of the Taser as a tool as previously stated and supports inclusion of this item in 2003 Budget preparations; however, staff was encouraged to expedite the purchase in 2002 if funds were available. A policy addressing the use of this tool in the field and required training requirements shall be in place prior to Taser use by the Dept. REPORTS The Committee reviewed the NIBRS 4~h Quarter Group A & B, 2001 Year-End, and ls~ Quarter 2002 Group A&B Reports. Burglaries and stolen/recovered property statistics were discussed. Chief Richardson briefed the Committee on the April 18th Community Partners Riverside Plaza Workshop facilitated by the Community Safety Project in Partnership with CSU Cooperative Extension program. Trustee Jeffrey-Clark noted that the workshop provided a favorable start in developing a working relationship between participants. Critical topics were identified and both short and long-term goals were outlined. FIRE DEPARTMENT (EPVFD) Fire Restrictions. Chief Dorman presented a fire danger map dated April 28th published by the National Interagency Fire Center that rated areas across the country between low to extreme in regards to the current fire danger. In response to the very high fire danger and the continuing drought conditions in the area, Chief Dorman issued a ban on open burning within the Town limits of Estes Park effective from 12:00 noon, April 30,2002 until otherwise lifted or changed by the Fire Chief or his designee. This ban shall apply to all open fires including the following: 1. Building, maintaining, attending or using fire for slash burning, campfire, recreational fires or educational fires. 2. Use of all fireworks including approved fireworks (i.e., sparklers, fountains). 3. Smoking on public property, except within an enclosed vehicle or building or an area approximately three feet in diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable material.
, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - May 2,2002- Page 2 4. Welding or operating acetylene or other torch with an open flame on outdoor property unless the area is clear of all flammable materials. Exceptions include: campfires in approved developed campsites or picnic grounds, charcoal grills, LPG or natural gas fired grills, other petroleum-fueled stoves, lanterns or heating devices, flares used by Public Safety agencies to warn the public of danger, training fires used by Public Safety agencies or persons with a permit for such actions. Additional fire bans in effect include the following areas: Larimer and Boulder Counties, Rocky Mountain National Park, and the U.S. Forest Service. Governor Owens proclaimed the week of April 2gth as Wildfire Awareness week and explained that additional state funds will be available to aid fire departments during the fire season. Chairman Gillette encouraged all citizens to take the fire ban seriously and follow the restrictions outlined above. Trustee Jeffrey-Clark expressed concern with pedestrian safety at the crosswalk located at Community Dr. and Graves Ave due to the Hwy. 36 detoured traffic. Chief Richardson and Public Works Director Linnane will observe the school crosswalks and provide additional signage, police patrols, and/or speed control equipment necessary to maintain pedestrian safety. There being no further business, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 8:22 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS - Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, May 9,2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the gth day of May 2002. Committee: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustees Habecker and Newsom Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Light & Power Director Matzke, Assistant to the Director Mangelsen, Museum Director Kilsdonk, and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent None Chairman Jeffrey-Clark called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS - UPDATE. Ruben Blackmon, General Manager/Charter Communications briefed the Committee on recent organizational changes, installation of the fiber optic line to the new Town Board room (Channel 39 upgrade), service to the Uplands Subdivision, and changes to the customer notification plan. Nick Mo116/Nick Molla Productions explained that installation of the fiber optic line in the new Town Board Room would greatly enhance the picture quality for all broadcasts on . Channel 39 (including Town Board meetings). The Committee expressed its appreciation to Mr. Mo116 for airing previous Town Board meetings at no cost to the Town. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK (RMNP) RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT - REQUEST APPROVAL. Tony Schetzsle and Larry Gamble from RMNP presented a draft Right-of-Way Permit that grants the Town the right to own, operate, and maintain the electrical distribution system within RMNP. This agreement includes Town-owned facilities that were covered under a previous permit and new facilities that have been constructed under the improvement program that began in 1995. Permit modifications discussed include raptor protection, 10' easement restrictions, tree trimming, and temporary access to inaccessible locations. Attorneys for the Town and RMNP are currently reviewing permit modifications. Due to current fire danger concerns, RMNP requests that the signed permit be in place prior to any tree trimming efforts in the vicinity of power lines. The Committee recommends that the Right-of-Way Permit be approved executed by the Mayor subject to successful negotiation of the modifications as discussed. CAUSEWAY CONDUIT REPAIRS - REQUEST APPROVAL. Director Matzke explained that staff discovered numerous breaks in the conduit previously installed under the Lake Estes Trail during cable installation preparations for the 2002 Meadowdale and Fish Creek project. The conduit was installed along the north side of the causeway in 1997. R.C. Heath, who did not install the initial conduit, presented a proposal to repair the damage by removing the existing sidewalk and conduit, and replace approximately 1,500 .sq. ft. of sidewalk at a cost of $14,154. The 2002 budget includes adequate funding to complete these repairs. The Committee recommends approval of the sidewalk removal and replacement by R.C. Heath at cost of approximatelj, $14,154.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light & Power Committee - May 9,2002 - Page 2 FALL RIVER HYDRO PLANT LANDSCAPING CHANGE ORDER - REQUEST APPROVAL. Director Matzke presented a change order request from T.A. Enterprises for $2,191.55 to cover the cost of design modifications to the Fall River Hydro Plant pedestrian bridge abutments, an additional concrete pad for the informational kiosk, and installation of additional electrical conduit. The 2002 budget was amended to include an additional $34,000 for the pedestrian bridge and will adequately fund this change order request. The Committee recommends approval of the change order request from TA Enterprises for $2,191.55 as outlined above. Assistant Mangelsen explained that the bridge would be installed on May 15' FALL RIVER HYDRO PLANT PEDESTRIAN TRAIL ENGINEERING SCOPE OF SERVICES - APPROVAL REQUEST. Director Matzke presented a Scope of Services for the Fall River Hydro Plant Trail Design from Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying at a cost of $9,850, to include surveying the area surrounding the proposed trail alignment, preparation of base maps with 2' contours, trail design with plan and profile sheets, preparation of construction documents, and preparation of necessary easements. The 2002 budget includes $10,000 for this project. The Committee recommends approval of the Scope of Services from Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying for the Fall River Hydro Plant Pedestrian Trail at a cost of $9,850. FALL RIVER HYDRO PLANT - STATE HONOR AWARD. Director Kilsdonk reported that Colorado Preservation, Inc. will present a State Honor Award to the Town for the Fall River Hydro Plant Project at a ceremony scheduled May 234. The Mayor will attend the ceremony. The Hydro Plant will be featured during an upcoming episode of HGTV's Restore America. The episode will be filmed at the Hydro Plant on May 1801 REPORTS. Downtown Lighting Committee - Update. Light & Power Secretary Button presented a Decorative Streetlight Project report summarizing public input and comments. Staff is conducting additional bulb research and will present their findings to the Lighting Committee for review. Platte River Power Authority. Brian Moeck recently celebrated his 3rd anniversary with PRPA. John Wittemeyer/PRPA General Council will retire in June. The Audit Interview Committee will interview 3 audit firms and present a recommendation for a new auditor at the May Board Meeting. A commission test on Rawhide turbine 1 will be conducted the first week of May. The Committee reviewed the April graphs and March income statements. Project Updates: (1) the Big Thompson Rebuild Project is well underway; staff is very pleased with the Contractor; a target completion date has not been set. There being no further business, Chairman Jeffrey-Clark adjourned the meeting at 9:21 a.m. %4.00*Un,u Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk
Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) Board Meeting Date: March 13,2002 Members Present: Eric Blackhurst, Sue Doylen, Lee Kundtz, Louise Olson, Karla Porter Members Absent: Staff Present: Sam Betters, Jean Michaelson, Staci Walker-Pence Others Present: Guests: Kristie Charles, Mary Bauer, Rita Kurelja, Joe Wise, Sara Rhodes, Jay Gentile, Michelle Johnson The March 13th meeting of the Estes Park Housing Authority was called to order by Sue Doylen, Chairperson, at 8:35 a.m. in Room 203 of the Municipal Building of the Town of Estes Park. APPROVAL OF MINUTES' Sue Doylen asked if anyone had any changes, comments, or questions to the February 13th minutes. Sue entertained the motion to accept the minutes, Eric Blackhurst moved to accept the minutes, Louise Olson seconded the motion with the following changes to be made: math correction in dry gulch area and resolutions need to be added. Unanimously approved. A verbal resolution requesting the Loveland Housing Authority administrative associates have the ability to on-line banking with Bank of Colorado was made by the Board. This resolution gives approval to administrative persons at the Loveland Housing Authority to utilize on-line banking capabilities with the Bank of Colorado. Louise Olson made a motion to accept the resolution allowing administrative associates to complete on-line banking for the Loveland Housing Authority with the Bank of Colorado. Eric Blackurst seconded the motion to approve the resolution. Special note for upcoming meetings - The Board has requested that financials for the previous month be included in the mailed board packets, not handed out at meeting. The intention is that these will no longer be covered in detail during the meeting to save time. They should be studied at home and questions identified at the meeting. Sam is available for discussion of the financials. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORTS - Cleave Street Financial statements for Cleave Street were handed out and reviewed at the meeting. Sam Betters reported that Cleave Street is doing fine, expenses are on target although income is slightly down. Currently there are two vacancies with a third coming in the near future. There are currently two tenants waiting to fill the current vacancies but none identified for the third vacancy. EPHA March Board Minutes - Page 1 of4
- EPHA Management Company Sam Betters reported that there are "no huge surprises" on the financial statements for the EPHA Management Company. The large net income will decrease as the year goes on. It is typical to have a large cash amount in the beginning of the year. The cash will dwindld as expenses are incurred through the remainder of the year. Currently Sam is spending a lot of time on Estes Park projects which is taking up budget dollars. There is a move to get this to development phase in oider to off-load Sam's current responsibility to EP projects. The work load has primarily focused on funding and conferences. Financials were reviewed the by the Board at the meeting. Maintenance expenses are currently charged for Rich Ekwall's time and A/P expenses are the engineers used on the projects. Jean reported on the bid on the infrastructure for Dry Gulch. Currently we have 21 total responses to this project, 12 requests for packages, 10 of those being from Estes A question was asked regarding the feedback from the presentation given at Home Builders meeting. The response was that the only issue raised is time-frame vs. avAilable work force. Some firms may not have adequate staffing; there is a pofential opportunity for a conglomeration ofmultiple companies. COMMITTEE REPORTS Building Committee - nothing to report. REPORTS UPDATES & OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Dry Gulch Sam Betters reported that building plans are completed and in our possession. Jean, Sam and Rich are scheduled to meet to review and to talk with Dave Lingle, the Architect. The building committee will now need.to become involved for final review of the buildings, review of the infrastructure proposals, etc. The buildink£ committee will meet prior to the next board meeting and come prepared to discuss the proj ect and make recommendations to the Board. No significant changes can really be made without time-delay as far as floor plan is concerned. The Board requested to look over the RFP. Responses are due by the 28th of March. Sam Betters gave a review of tax credit information. The financing request received favorable review with CHFA and will be presented at their April Board meeting for approval o f the tax credit allocation. Novogradac & Company is revising their market study to CHFA requirements. Section 8 Vouchers Jean repprted on Section 8 Voucher usage and availability in Estes Park. There were 29 vouchers awarded in October 2001,14 general population and 15 disabled population. Of the 14 EPHA March Board Minutes - Page 2 of4
general vouchers, 11 are housed and three are pending. The slowest response is for the disabled vouchers. Only three of the 15 for disabled are being utilized. We have gone through all applicants and still have 12 available for disabled. Jack Dinsmoor delivered informational brochures to employers, social services, crossroads, churches etc. Resolution Discussion Resolution #12 Louise Olson read resolution #12. Resolution #12 is a recommendation to the Board for the appointment of Jack Dinsmoor to the EPHA Board of Commissioners as a Commissioner for a term of 5 years effective April 10,2002 and ending April 10, 2007. Jack will be taking the place of current member Louise Olson whose five year term will expire in April. Louise Olson moved to adopt this resolution, Karla Porter seconded this motion. Motion was called to vote by Sue Doylen and the motion to accept Resolution #12 was passed. The recommendation will go before the Mayor and Town Trustees on March 268. Sue entered into discussion relating to Resolution #12 - We had four exceptional applicants for this position. Sue Doylen and Louise Olson interviewed each applicant. Applicants were Rita Kurelja, Wendle Amos, Judy Moore, and Jack Dinsmoor. A thanks was given to Rita for all her help with the Board's efforts. Resolution #13 Sue Doylen read resolution #13. This is a resolution recommending approval o f a bad debt write-offpolicy for use by the EPHA. The resolution states the practices for bad debt write-offs in conjunction with notification being made to the Board. The Board will be notified in the event that uncollectible debts will impact the budget - exceeding the annual budget amount for uncollectibles. Sam Betters made clarification that the Board will not be informed ofbad debts unless the amount is in excess o f the current annual budget as stated in the policy - i f approved. This policy will apply to all Estes Park properties. Eric moved to approve the adoption of Resolution #13, seconded by Lee Kundtz. Vote of Board called by Sue Doylen. Motion passed. A discussion was entered regarding handling of evictions. Evictions are handled according to state guidelines and are given due process. EPHA willlook into providing pre-eviction assistance to clients some time in the future. A discussion was entered regarding available office space for employees. Currently the Town does not have additional office space available to EPHA. The current space does not allow privacy or discussion of confidential issues and the impact to others in the shared space will EPHA March Board Minutes - Page 3 of 4
increase as the office continues to grow. Is there an opportunity to utilize Dry Gulch for this need? Sue would like to see EPHA stay more centrally located and accessible to the community. Jean believes it is best to stay in the Town building to best meet the needs of our clients and accessibility to the Town departments during the development process. Sam believes there are financial advantages for us being here, use of office equipment etc. that is provided by the Town. The hope is that the Board Room remodel will provide a different space for EPHA. ADJOURN Sue thanked non-board attendees. A motion to go into Executive Session was requested by Sue Doylen. Eric Blackhurst moved to adjourn from public session, Lee Kundtz seconded. Sue Doylen sited the following statutory citation in reference to topic discussions in the Executive Session: Open session was reconvened at 1 1 a.m. to make a motion. A motion was made by Lee Kundtz to give a prope~ thank you to Louise for her term of service with the Board. Eric Blackhurst seconded the motion. C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(a) To discuss the puichase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of real, personal, or other property interest. Topic of Discussion: Property Interest Matter to be Discussid: Same a& above C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators. Topic of Discussion: , Land Negotiation Matter to be Discussed: Same as above The meeting adjourned at 9:28a.m. Respectfully submitted, Staci M Walker-Pence Loveland Housing Authority/Estes Housing Authority Executive Assistant EPHA March Board Minutes - Page 4 of4
, BRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment May 7,2002,8:00 a.m. Board Room (Room 130), Estes Park Municipal Building Board: Chair Joe Ball, Members Jeff Barker, Judy Lamy, Wayne Newsom and Al Sager Attending: Chair Ball, Members Barker, Lamy, Newsom and Sager Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott and Recording Secretary Williamson Absent: None Chair Ball called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agendaand not necessarily the chronological sequence. 1. CONSENT AGENDA The minutes of the April 2,2002 meeting were accepted as presented. 2. SE CORNER OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5N, RANGE 73W OF THE 6TH P.M.; 2283 EAGLE CLIFF RD., APPLICANT: KAY & DAVID RUSK - VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 4, TABLE 4-5 AND SECTION 6.3.C.2 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Director Joseph reviewed the requested variance. On April 2,2002, the Board of Adjustment granted a three (3) foot variance to the fifteen (15) foot setback along the north property line at 2283 Eagle Cliff Road, as requested by the owners, Dave and Kay Rusk. The request was based on a measurement, made by the owner, from a line that began at the northwest corner marker to a pin-in-concrete marker located approximately midway down the north property line. This pin-in- concrete marker denotes the corner of a neighbor's property and was thought to be on the owner's property line. A survey, completed on April 25, 2002, determined that the pin-in-concrete marker is not on the actual property line. The actual property line is south of the line previously made by the owners. Therefore, based on the completed survey, the owners are asking for an additional seventeen (17) inches to the granted three (3) foot variance. The total variance requested is four (4) feet five (5) inches. Applicant, Dave Rusk, 2283 Eagle Cliff Road, owner of subject property, was present to answer questions. He stated there is an area of "no mans land" between their property and his neighbor. Initially, they believed the pin was the corner pin for their lot. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Lamy) to approve the variance request to allow for a four (4) foot five (5) inch variance from the mandated fifteen (15) foot sid6 yard setback for the proposed extension to be built ten (10) feet seven (7) inches from the side lot line with the following conditions and it passed unanimously. All variances granted by the Board of Adjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commenced within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted. 1. A registered land surveyor shall set the survey stakes for the foundation forms. After the footings are set and prior to pouring the foundation, the surveyor shall verify compliance with the variance and provide a setback certificate.
....FOROPUILISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment May 7,2002 Page 2 3. LOT 36, VENNER RANCH ESTATES: 580 UPPER VENNER ROAD, APPLICANT: ARTHUR& KATHLEEN FLOYD-VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 5.2.D.4 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance to Section 5.2.D.4 "Maximum Accessory Building or Structure Size" of the Estes Valley Development Code. Specifically, the applicant wishes to construct a detached 1,600 square foot garage and storage building. The applicant proposes to build in an area that has already been excavated. The site is steeply sloped and heavily forested, thus providing visual seclusion. The burden of demonstrating adequate hardship rests on the applicant. The applicant could build a smaller structure or build two separate structures, which would increase overall site disturbance. The Floyds have owned the property since 1998, priorto adoption of the current Estes Valley Development Code. Member Lamy questioned the height of the roof and the ratio of cars versus storage. Applicant, Arthur Floyd, 580 Upper Venner, owner of subject property, was present to answer questions. He stated the pitch of the roof would be 214 on 12 and the property is on a 45 degree pitch. Therefore, the building will be built into the side of the hill. He stated he would store 6 cars in the building. Public Comment: None. It,was moved and seconded (Sager/Newsom) to approve the variance request to allow for the Accessory Building and it passed unanimously with the following conditions. All variances granted bythe Board of Adjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commenced within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted. , 1. Applicant shall contact Larimer County Wildfire Safety Coordinator Tony Simons to arrange for wildfire mitigation. 2. Foundation shall be engineered. 3. The Applicant shall demonstrate that the slope's ground surface and subsurface are not unstable, that the proposed development will not cause instability or increase the potential for slope failure, and that the development of the slope will not increase the degree of hazard both on-site and on adjacent properties. 4. Building finish shall be non-reflective and muted earth-tone colors. 5. Roof shall be non-reflective green surface. 6. Prior to application for building permit, the Floyds shall contact Chuck Harris (577-2100) to obtain either a temporary or final certificate ofoccupancy. 4. LOT 9, THOMPSON'S PINEWOOD ACRES: 640 PINEWOOD LANE, APPLICANT: MONTE & CAROLE HOUSE - VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 4, TABLE 4-2 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance to Table 4-2 Front Setback for the "E-1" District of the Estes Valley Development Code. Specifically, the applicant wishes to deviate from the mandated twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback to allow construction of an attached two-car garage with a setback of thirteen (13) feet. It is staffs opinion there are no special circumstances or conditions associated with the lot. The lot exceeds the minimum lotsize and width standards set forth for the "Ed" Estate district (minimum lot size is 1 acre, lot in question is 1.2 acres; minimum lot width is 100 feet, lot in question is approximately 330 feet wide). The applicant has owned the
8//0/0//PUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment May 7,2002 Page 3 house since June 1999, prior to adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code. At the time the applicant purchased the house, the required setback was twenty- five (25) feet; therefore, the required setback has been in place since before the applicant purchased the home. The character of the neighborhood would be somewhat affected. Staff recommends denial of the requested variance. The applicant could build a twelve (12) foot addition to the existing garage and meet the setback requirements. This would provide for a two-car garage. Applicant, Monte House, 640 Pinewood Lane, owner of subject property, was present to answer questions. He stated they would like to maintain the architectural integrity of the house and the neighborhood. He has worked with 3 different architects to find the best way to add the garage and maintain the architecture of the house. He stated the property has a population of 100 year old ponderosa pines that would have to be cut in order to place the garage in a different location. Also, if they placed the garage in a different location it would require additional driveway and paving. He would request the staff drop the requirement for an additional survey. He feels the lot is well marked with corner pins. He stated this addition of the garage would bring the house up to date. Member Sager questioned whether they could add on to the existing garage to make it a two-car garage. Mr. House stated this would require tearing down the original garage and removing a structural wall to build a larger garage. Member Sager stated he feels the request is excessive. He believes there is another way to build this garage without adking for a substantial variance. Member Lamy asked if the goal was to have a three-car garage. Mr. House stated he would like a three-car garage in order to maintain the value of the property. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Sager) to deny the requested variance due to the fact a two-car garage could be constructed meeting the requirements of the code. Those voting "yes": Lamy, Sager, Barker, and Newsom. Those voting "no": Ball. 5. LOT 6, BLOCK 6, AMENDED WINDCLIFF SUBDIVISION, FIFTH FILING: 1451 JUNGFRAU TRAIL, APPLICANT: JACK & JACQUELYN REED- VARIANCE REQUEST FROM SECTION 4, TABLE 4-2 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests a variance to Section 4, Table 4-2 "Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts" of the Estes Valley Development Code. The lot is undeveloped and the petitioner is requesting setback variances to build a single-family house with a footprint of approximately 92 feet by 32 feet and a height of approximately 32 feet. The lot is undersized for the zoning district. The minimum lot size for the "E-1" Estate zoning district is one (1) acre. The size of this lot is 0.295 acres (12,850 square feet). The proposed house may not substantially alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Adjoining property owners have not contacted staff to comment on this proposal and staff is not aware of their opinions about the variance request. The applicant purchased the property prior to the February 1, 2000 effective date of the Estes Valley Development Code and without knowledge of the requirements.
BRADFOROPWILISHINGCO, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment May 7,2002 Page 4 Jamie Kenny, Westover Construction, was present representing the applicants. The Architectural Control Committee did agree to approve the request as presented due to a large tree that would be affected if the house was moved to the south. Member Sager stated that some of the largest homes in Estes Park are being built in Windcliff and there is undoubtedly a good reason for the large homes. He also stated that many of the lots have undesirable shapes and require special design in order to build upon them. The property line off of Eagle Cliff drive is 20 to 30 feet from the gravel road and the only access would be from Jungfrau. He feels this is another compelling reason for the variance. Member Newsom agreed with Member Sager's comments. Director Joseph advised the zoning for Windcliff is an exception to the rule. Windcliff property owners wanted to retain the "E" estate zoning instead of the more appropriate zoning of "R" residential, which.would have decreased the setback requirements. Therefore, he stated we will see more variance requests for this area. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Sager/Barker) to approve the variance request to allow for a 10.5 foot variance from the mandated twenty-five (25) foot side yard variance for the northern side lot line to build a single-family house 14.5 feet from the side lot line; a 10.52 foot variance from the mandated twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback on Jungfrau Trail to the east, to build a single family house 14.48 feet from the front lot line, and an 11 foot variance from the mandated twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback on Eagle Cliff Drive to the west, to build a single-family house 14 feet from the front lot line and it passed unanimously with the following conditions. All variances granted by the Board of Adjustment shall become null and void if a Building Permit has not been issued and paid for, and the work commenc6d within twelve (12) months from the date the variance is granted. 1. A registered land surveyor shall set the survey stakes for the foundation forms. After the footings are set and prior to pouring the foundation, the surveyor shall verify compliance with the variance and provide a setback certificate. 6. REPORTS Member Sager complimented staff for their effort to sign the subject properties. He stated that any sign is better than none, whether or not that the sign should be larger is up for discussion. There being no further business, Chair Ball adjourned the meeting at 9:25 a.m. Joe Ball, Chair Jacquelyn Williamson, Recording Secretary
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission April 16,2002,1:30 p.m. Board Room (Room 130), Estes Park Municipal Building Commission: Chair Cherie Pettyjohn, Commissioners Wendell Amos, DeeDee Hampton, Joyce Kitchen, Edward Pohl, Ed McKinney, and Dominick Taddonio Attending: Chair Pettyjohn, Commissioners McKinney, Kitchen, Poht and Taddonio Also Attending: Town Board Liaison Habecker, Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott and Recording Secretary Williamson Absent: DeeDee Hampton, Wendell Amos Chair Pettyjohn called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated March 19, 2002. It was moved and seconded (Kitchen/Taddonio) that the Consent Agenda be accepted and it passed unanimously with two absent. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 02-03, EPCO, INC., Applicant: Dennis K. Brown Kerry Prohaska of Cornerstone Engineering was present representing the applicant. Mr. Prohaska gave a brief history of the project. He requested the development plan be continued to the May 21, 2002 Planning Commission meeting due to the late notice received by the engineering company from the Attorneys involved. It was moved and seconded (McKinney/Kitchen) to recommend continuance of the Development Plan 02-03, EPCO, Inc. to the May 21, 2002 Planning Commission meeting with the understanding if the applicant comes unprepared the Development Plan will be removed from the agenda, and the applicant must resubmit a new application. 4. SPECIAL REVIEW 02-01, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHURCH, LOT 1, MARY'S LAKE SUBDIVISION, Applicant: Rocky Mountain Church Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. This is a development plan/special review application for the Rocky Mountain Evangelical Free Church. The property is zoned "A" Accommodations/Highway Corridor and religious assemblies are permitted by special review in this district. Since this is a special review, the Town Board will review the application and serve as the decision making body. The applicant has submitted a plan for a well designed attractive church and does a good job in the selection of materials and colors that blend with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. This application was continued from the March 19, 2002 Planning Commission meeting to the April 16, 2002 meeting at the applicant's request. Since the March 19, 2002 Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted a revised Traffic Impact Analysis, which was completed by TransPIan Associates, Inc. on March 25,2002. Director Joseph reviewed the Traffic Impact Study. He stated the operating level of service for the intersection at Highway 7 and Mary's Lake Road with full build out of the available land would still be a Level A. Staff agreed as along as the level of service continued to be a Level A it would not warrant an intersection improvement. Staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission therefore would be that the applicant does not trigger an intersection improvement to Highway 7 and Mary's Lake Road. However, all recommended improvements to the Kiowa drive intersection should be constructed.
BRADFORD PUILISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - April 16,2002 Page 2 Public Comment: Jess Mann, the senior Pastor of the Rocky Mountain Church, gave a history of the church. He discussed how the church has tried to involve the neighborhood and work with the community. It was moved and seconded (McKinney/Pohl) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Special Review 02-01 Rocky Mountain Church, Lot 1, Mary's Lake Subdivision withthe following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 1. Widen Kiowa Drive North to provide a separate rightiturn lane. The right-turn lane shall meet or exceed SHAC requirements. Revised construction plans shall be submitted after review of the revised Traffic Impact Analyses and shall comply with requirements in Roxann Mackenzie Hayes February 20th memo and any additional requirements placed on the design by the Town or County. These plans shall be submitted, one paper copy and one digital copy, prior to the Town signing the development plan.' Instead of modifying the existing development agreement between the Town and the developer of Mary's Lake Subdivision, a new development agreement shall be reached between the Town and the developer of Rocky Mountain Church, as well as appropriate collateral. This agreement and collateral shall make up the difference between the original design and the new design with a right-turn lane. The agreement, guarantee and warranty shall comply with EVDC §10.5.K. 2. The electric utility easement shall be vacated and relocated as shown on the amended plat approved by the Planning Commission on February 19, 2002. 3. Retaining wall design shall be reviewed by staff when the building permit is submitted to ensure compliance with the EVDC §7.2.B.6.e Code requirement. 4. The applicant shall construct an eight (8) foot wide paved public trail/sidewalk along Kiowa Drive to the Mary's Lake Lodge curb cut and along Mary's Lake Road. Construction of this public trail/sidewalk shall not increase the impervious coverage over the fifty (50) percent maximum allowable; therefore, installation of the sidewalk may require a reduction in the parking lot coverage. 5. A cost estimate for the proposed landscaping improvements and guarantee shall be submitted with the building permit application. 6. Water line iMprovements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The water meter location and size shall be shown. Depending on the water main and ISO requirements, a possible water system reimbursementto the Kiowa Ridge developer may be required. 7. Site-specific donstruction plans §hall be submitted with the building permit application. 8. Unless otherwise noted, any conditions of approval shall be met by May 7,2002 in order to be placed on the May 14, 2002 Town Board agenda. On-site road and sidewalk improvements (Kiowa Drive) shall be completed prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. This conditional approval shall include approval of a minor modification to the EVDC to allow construction of the handicapped parking/entrance area forty (40) feet from the wetlands, instead of the required fifty (50) feet. This is a twenty (20) percent variance from the wetlands setback requirements. 5. AMENDED PLAT, LOTS 18A, 18B AND 18C OF"LOTS 17A, 18A, 18B AND 18C, GREELEY- BOULDER COLONY SUBDIVISION, BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 17,18 AND 19. GREELEY-BOULDER COLONY SUBDIVISION", 2395 Highway 66, Applicant: William & Toni Swanson Director Joseph reviewed the staff report. This is a request to vacate and relocate easements for an existing subdivision. The Greeley-Boulder Colony Subdivision was originally platted in 1918. The Board of County Commissioners approved an amended plat forlots 17,18 and 19 in February 2002 (File 99-S1521). This amended plat will relocate easements; no boundary line adjustments or additional lots are proposed with this plat. Paul Kochevar of Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers was present representing the applicant. He stated the goal is to move the utility easement running through the middle of the lots to make the lots more suitable for building.
en/OFORIPUILISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes ValliyflanniffiCommiIgion=-April-16,-2002-------·------page-3 Public Comment: Ellis Hattan, a neighbor to the west, questioned whether he would incur interrupts in his power service. Paul Kochevar assured Mr. Hattan the neighbors would be notified when there was an interruption in service. Mr. Hattan asked if he could have copies of the new utility plans. Director Joseph stated copies would be available as soon as they were approved. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Kitchen) to recommend approval to the County Commissioners of the Amended Plat, Lots 18A, 18B and 18C of "Lots 17A, 18A, 18B and 18C, Greeley-Boulder Colony Subdivision, being an Amended Plat of Lots 17,18 and 19, Greeley-Boulder Colony Subdivision" with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 1. A driveway maintenance agreement for Lots 18A, 18B and 18C shall be submitted for recording with signed mylars. This maintenance agreement shall be subject to review and approval by Town Attorney White. 2. Compliance with Town Attorney White's comments dated March 21,2002. 3. Prior to connection to Town water system, compliance with Public Works Director Linnane's comments dated March 19, 2002, which includes ten line items. 4. Compliance with Larimer County Engineering (Dale Greer) comments dated March 14,2002. 6. CONCEPT PLAN FOR LOTS 1-6, SOLITUDE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS/PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAPS FORLOTS 2-5, SOLITUDE SUBDIVSION, Applicant: Fish Creek Properties, LLC Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. This is a development plan and preliminary condominium map application for Lots 2,3,4, and 5 of the Solitude Subdivision. These are , four separate development plans and four separate preliminary condominium maps. A concept plan was submitted to provide an overview of the entire development, i.e. for informational purposes only. The entire Solitude Subdivision is zoned "A" Accommodations/Highway Corridor. The applicant is proposing to build and condominiumize ten (10) accommodations units on Lot 2; seven (7) units on Lot 3; seven (7) units on Lot 4, and six (6) units on Lot 5. The applicant submitted development plans for Lots 1 and 6 for review next month. Development on all lots in the Solitude Subdivision is limited to accommodations uses only. On October 16, 2001, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the Solitude Subdivision preliminary plat. One of the conditions of approval was that "The Protective Covenants shall restrict the use of each unit to accommodations use and shall use the same definition of accommodations use as the Estes Valley Development Code Section 13.3.67 The Town Board approved the final plat on March 12,2002. Paul Kochevar of Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers was present representing the applicant. He pointed out the inaccuracies in the site data tables and the staff findings. Mr. Kochevar stated condition 4 in the staff report does not give him the option to meet the parking code requirements without going to the Board of Adjustment. The staff condition limits his options. He has a new parking lot plan; however the new plan would eliminate a10 inch tree. The initial design tried to leave as many trees as possible. Planner Chilcott stated Mr. Kochevar discussed with staff the requirements for the parking lot on Lot 2 after the staff report was completed. Mr. Kochevar submitted a number of parking lot options; however a preferred alternative was not established prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Public Comment: Al Sager is a memberof the general public. He questioned the numberof units being proposed. He feels this will have considerable impact on the neighborhood. He would like to see the Planning Commission make a concerted effortto limit the numberof variances submitted to the Board of Adjustment. No action was required and none was taken on the Concept Plan.
BRADFORO PUBLISHING Co. RECORD; OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - April 16,2002 Page 4 It was moved and seconded (Kitchen/McKinney) to approve Development Plans 02-10,02- 11 and 02-12 for Lot 3, Lot 4 and Lot 5, Solitude Subdivision, and to approve Development Plan 02-09, Lot 2, Solitude Subdivision, contingent upon a mutual agreement between the staff and the applicant with regard to the numberand location of parking spaces, with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent 1. In order to ensure that these resort cabins remain accommodations, the following conditions listed in Item #2 of Town Attorney White's March 28,2002 letter shall be met. Also, the Site Data note stating, "Inumber] residential units are allowed and [number] residential units are proposed," shall be changed to read that "[number] accommodations (resorUcabin) units are allowed and [number] accommodations (resort/cabin) units are proposed." 2. The note stating, "Required Private Open Space of 15%=..." shall be removed. 3. The Lot 5 Landscape Plan calls for 24 shrubs along the northerh property line. These shrubs shall be shown on the plan. The Property Description for the Lot 2 Landscape Plan refers to Lot 3; this shall be corrected. 4. Development Plan 02-09 and the Preliminary Condominium Map shall be contingent on the approval of the parking lot for Lot 2 between the staff and the applicant with the recognition that staff has the ability to approve a maximum 10 percent variance. 5. A copy of the recorded private access and vehicle parking easement agreements for [1] the Lot 6 shared parking, [2] the Lot 2/3 shared parking, and [3] the Lot 4/5 shared parking shaft be submitted prior to issuance of a building p&rmit for any use served by the off-site parking areas. The Lot 6 agreement shali ensure that parking necessary to serve development on Lot 6 and development on Lots 2,3,4, and 5 is provided, i.e. in addition to the parking spaces required to serve development on Lot 6, parking spaces shall be provided on Lot 6 to serve development on Lots 2-5. 6. The parking sections shall be changed to show three (3) inches of asphalt for the driveways and two (2) inches of asphalt for the rest of the parking lot. 7. Site-specific construction plans shall be submitted with the building permit application(s), including a grading plan demonstrating compliance with the EVDC §7.2 Grading and Site Disturbance Standards. 8. The existing cabins on Lot 2 shall be removed prior to issuance of the first building permit for Lot 2. 9. Approval of this development plan includes approval of a minor modification of twenty-five (25) percent to allow driveway spacing of at least 112.5 feet from the pavement edge of any other driveway. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/McKinney) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees the Preliminary Condominium Maps for Lot 2 subject to the approval of Development Plan 02-09 by staff, Lot 3, Lot 4, and Lot 5 Solitude Subdivision, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 7. REPORTS None. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 4:37 p.m. Cherie Pettyjohn, Chair Jacquelyn Williamson, Recording Secretary
TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum May 3,2002 TO: Town Board EROM: Bill Iinnane ~6 SUBJECT: Resolution to increase the scope of the CDOT Causeway Project by $30,000 reimbursable funds Background CDOT expanded the scope of the Causeway Project to overlay the entire section, from Community Drive to Mall Road. The additional cost is $30,000 to be paid by the Town and reimbursed at 100 percent The expanded contract requires an approval by the Town through a Resolution. CosUBudget • Cost $30,000 • The budget would be amended by $30,000 and fully reimbursed by CDOT. Action Staff recommends adopting a Resolution. BL/lb
RESOLUTION NO. 11-02 WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park has previously budgeted and appropriated in its 2002 Budget, sufficient funds for the Town to administer the Causeway/Fish Creek Intersection Project; and WHEREAS, in order for CDOT to expand the project and overlay the Causeway for said overlay and project amendment; and WHEREAS the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to approve and authorize said Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK1 COLORADO: 1. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park hereby approves and authorizes a $30,000 expenditure to be 100% reimbursed by CDOT, and the execution of the Transportation Enhancement Contract by and between the State of Colorado for the use and benefit of the Colorado Department of Transportation in the Town of Estes Park for the Causeway/Fish Creek Intersection Project. 2. The appropriate officials of the Town of Estes Park are hereby authorized to execute the funding letter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND PASSED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK on this day of ,2002. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk
Town of Estes Pal* Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner I and Bob Joseph, Director Date: April 4,2002 Subject: Chamberlain Subdivision, Amended Plat of Lots 2 and 3, Ten Brook Resubdivision (Boundary Line Adjustment) Background. This is a minor subdivision (boundary line adjustment) application for Lots 2 and 3 of the Ten Brook Resubdivision. The site is located at 340 Virginia Drive. Paul Stephen Chamberlain owns both lots, which are zoned "RM" multi-family residential. Location Map The Planning Commission voted to NZZLEW« 1-lk \ recommend conditional approval of -----«7 , , the amended plat at the March 19, 2002 meeting. --1 Wonderview Avenue (US 34 Bypass) - .hin,-le"4 Budget. 1.- -- A Lot 3 --1---| kn B~00* Re,ubdD,bion -3\ 11/ 1.-·Irl None. Lot 2 Littlit(Tr- » \ 42 1 Action. Approval of the Amended Plat.
Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner I and Bob Joseph, Director Date: May 10, 2002 Subject: Special Review - Rocky Mountain Church Development Plan Background. This is a development plan/special review application for the Rocky Mountain Evangelical Free Church. The site is located at Mary's Lake Road and Kiowa Drive, south of Mary's Lake, in the Town of Estes Park. The property is zoned "A" Accommodations/Highway Corridor and religious assemblies are permitted by special review in this district. The church will include a sanctuary holding approximately 650 people, and gym, education and administration areas. The church square footage is 48,440 square feet and 226 parking spaces will be provided. The church and parking lot will be built in two phases, as shown on the development plan. The Planning Commission voted to recommend conditional approval of the Rocky Mountain Evangelical Free Church's special review development plan on April 16, 2002. Location Map Budget. - I - None. J fubdi,ision Action. .11 Approval of the special review M~,Vs Lake Rd (CR 67 be /ff. development plan with the conditions recommended by the Lot 1, Man/s Lake , ~ 4„y Fox Subdwision ~=! Subdi"ion A. Planning Commission. . CO State Highwa 77 ~ - $, .g % Kiowi Ridge Subdivision H A i IV I «T
Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner I and Bob Joseph, Director Date: May 9,2002 Subject: Preliminary Condominium Maps for Lots 2 through 5 of the Solitude Subdivision Background. Preliminary condominium map applications for Lots 2,3,4, and 5 of the Solitude Subdivision. Each lot has a separate preliminary condominium map to condominiumize the proposed accommodations units on each lot ( Lot 1: 10 resort lodge/cabins, Lot 2: 10 resort lodge/cabins, Lot 3: 7 resort lodge/cabins, Lot 4: 7 resort lodge/cabins, Lot 5: 6 resort lodge/cabins). The site is located at 600 Fish Creek Road, in the Town of Estes Park, and is owned by Carlson Family Trust. The lot is zoned "A-1" Accommodations Highway Corridor. Location Map The Planning Commission j ~1 - 1 \,4 conditionally approved --1-1 F development plans for these lots ~ublic Open Spa- and voted to recommend 11 j 7- 2,------* conditional approval of the four \ // Schoo preliminary condominium maps on April 16, 2002. Fish Creek Roa d/- i \4\ - 600 Fish Creek Road Budget Rmdie Avenue None. - 1 11 3 4-_u mi -)1 b Action. Approval of the preliminary condominium maps for Lots 2,3,4, and 5 of Solitude Subdivision with the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission and the condition that a shuttle be provided from the overflow parking on Lot 6 to Lots 2,3,4, and 5.
Town Clerk's Office Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Date: May 10, 2002 Subject: Casa Grande Mexican Restaurant - New Liquor License Application Jose "Trini" Gonzales-Ruiz requested an interpreter for this public hearing. Thus, we scheduled Priscilla Lujan to act on Trini's behalf. As you can see on his application, Mr. Gonzales-Ruiz owns and operates a restaurant with a liquor license in Alaska. He is well aware of the seriousness of liquor sales and he may also seek Priscilla's assistance for an upcoming T.I.P.S. Training class.
CoPY July 2000 PROCEDURE FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION NEW LIQUOR LICENSE MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on the application of Jose T. Gonzales-Ruiz, dba CASA GRANDE MEXICAN RESTAURANT, for a New Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License located at 210 E. Elkhorn Ave., Units 206 & 220. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the facts and evidence determined as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type and availability of liquor outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consideration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed. This public hearing will be conducted in the following manner: Il The applicant will be allowed to state his case and present any evidence he wishes to support his application. I~ The opponents will be given an opportunity to state their case and present any evidence in opposition to the application. o The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal limited to the evidence presented by the opponents. No new evidence may be submitted. C] The opponents will be allowed a rebuttal which may only rebut the evidence of the applicants. No new evidence may be offered. El The Board of Trustees may ask any questions of any person speaking at any time during the course of this hearing. TOWN CLERK. Will present the application and confirm the following: 0 The application was filed April 5,2002.
D At a meeting of the Board of Trustees on April 23,2002, the public hearing was set for 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 14, 2002. 0 The neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of this application and hearing were established to be 3.15 miles. O The Town has received all necessary fees and hearing costs. 0 The applicant is filing as a Individual. Il The property is zoned C-D which allows this type of business as a permitted use. Il The notice of hearing was published on Mav 3,2002 The premises was posted on Mav 3,2002 0 There is a police report with regard to the investigation of the applicant. n Status of T.I.P.S. Training: X, Unscheduled Scheduled Completed (Date: ) There is a map indicating all liquor outlets presently in the Town of Estes Park available upon request. MAYOR. 0 Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application, and if so, to read all communication. 0 Indicate that all evidence presented will be accepted as part of the record. 0 Ask the Board if they have any further comments or questions. 0 Declare the public hearing closed. SUGGESTED MOTION: Finding. The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are/are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are/are not for the granting of this liquor license. Motion. Based upon the above findings, I move that this license be granted/denied.
I -4 9* ~k>,¥ TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department 92*li'.3 .'36 3 t=% r b IU-:19'!P]'4~t .. -#-M&9.rea Uh>.. .#2431·\A lihi April 9,2002 Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Casa Grande Mexican Restaurant Hotel & Restaurant Gonzales-Ruiz, Jose T. DOB: 04/02/69 Dear Ms. van Deutekom: An Estes Park Police Department local records check based upon the name and date of birth on the above-named individual has been made. There are no local records on the above-named individual. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Casa Grande Mexican Restaurant. Sincerely, »k LLu_ ~owe-fardson Z~ Chief of Police, Estes Park Police Department LR:bw (970) 586-4465 · RO. BOX 1287 · ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-4496
DR 8404 (05/98) Page 1 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION COLORADO LIQUOR 1375 SHERMAN STREET OR 3.2% FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE DENVER CO 80261 RETAIL LICENSE APPLICATION 8~EW LICENSE U TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP U LICENSE RENEWAL • ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN • APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) • LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ • APPUCANT SHOULD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COLORADO LIQUOR AND BEER CODE(Call 303-321-4164) DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 1. Applicant is applying as a ~Individual El Corporation . U Limited Liability Company U Partnership (includes Limited Liability and Husband and Wife Partnerships) O Association or Other 2._Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Fein Number 609 --- 1 v*in-Idnct GnA'za le.1,- Ruiz,. 2a.~p:~de Name o~stablishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone c .ciscx uranote. He.*1 ran 7*ies-lctoran+ 9 1009,9 N/A 3. Address of Premises (specify exfct location of premises) aiD East € 1 Khorn Autnoe 401 6 AAO ¢ 406 Citx- County State ZIP Code t>6-ks Potrk Larifne.r On 8051 9 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town 0 h State ZIP Code PO 60* & 868 E«s T arri (0 805 19 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following questions: Present Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Class of License Present Expiration Date A A 1,~ ...r m SECTIONA.-. .i»-04. -' "<,APPUCAMON FEES V- .1 UAB:nt: 2. > 23. SECTIONDL s.-7 .. *'LIQUOR LICENSE FEES I ]60 gl6ate Renewal Application Fee................................$500.00 194 m Retail Liquor Store License (city) ........................$202.50 _300 w' Application Fee for New License .............................. 650.00 1940 0 Retail Liquor Store License (county) .....................287.50 2300 0 Application Fee-New License Concurrent Review,... 750.00 '1~50 0 Liquor Licensed Drugstore (city) ..,.....,.......,...,.,.,.202.50 2310 2 Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership ............... 650.00 4950 D Liquor Licensed Drugstore (county) ..................... 287.50 '/'+' r.tr.:. g. SECTION B „. 1. k '..~~ 3.256 BEER LICENSE FEES 1960 2 Beer & \Nine License (city)...................................326.25 2121 / Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (city) .......,,..,......,..,$71.25 1960 0 Beer & Wine Licey (county).,......,.,,.,.,.,.,,....,..,.411.25 2121 El Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (county).,....,...,....., 92.50 : 1970 ~1·1 & R License€[city C]county .........................475.00 ~2122 U Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises- (city) ........................71.25 1980 El H&R Licensew/opt Prem C]city C]county......475.00 2122 0 Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (county) ................... 92.50 1990 ¤ Club License El city m county ...........................283.75 2123 U Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises-(city) ,..,,.,.,.,......,71.25 2010 O Tavern License m city m county........................ 475.00 *2123 E Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises- (county) ..........,..92.50 2020 C]Arts License [Jcity O county.............................283.75 2030 0 Racetrack License m city m county....................475.00 1 I, SECTION C N"?. RELATED FEES AND PERMITS~ 2040 El Optional Premises License [J city m county...... 475.00 2210-100 (999) E Retail Warehouse Storage Permit ..................,...$75.00 ,1905 U Retail Gaming Tavern Lic O city E county........ 475.00 1980-100 (999) m Addition of Optional Premises to existing hotil/restaurant ¥975 0 Brew-Pub License 725.00 $75.00 x Total Fee h f. Il Other 1970-750 (999) U Manager's Registration (Hotel & Restaurant) ........$75.00 *2 k No Fee O 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises Only Delivery Permit 2010-750 (999) ~ Manager's Registration (Tavern) ...._...-'.-'-".. $75.00 43 1. No Fee 0 Retail Liquor Store Delivery Permit DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY , ~ ···· : ·d' ····, ' ~...> + 3%«'44«4 IF'ff : 1. ' f. A.2 4- '. LIABILfry INFORMATION G." - 1. . I. I. .' . I: :h... t:':- t: County -1.f .. . ., ' 1 2 . City :. ' .. industry Type '/. 42,4 <l RLicens, Abcol,At NAb@r· ··14 ' ' -: ; ' Liability Date.0,.C. . 99°nse ~*sued Through 4 ; 4 : (Expiration Date) - FROM < ~t 1 TO . :2 :#/ f: ..p %:VW 5.... I - :'3~·6'..'-r. 9 .4 q. : ' 1, . . . .~..1 c.- - State v ·' ··i. . :: i.j .rf. City.." 7 - ~'.Ci:County ,, . ·~; z' - ..L·Managers Rege |m , ~ .a-750 (999) ... it '2180-100 (999), · t2190-100 (999)":.4 53'f . 6: ..750 (999) I , t..~~i··; f.~ .. '" '' ·· ~~9~ · I ·· 3 1 3. .·' .#.:: .. #: 4 4 0. :4 .., . ~.V A - 2 -: 'Iiililfiltiillillillittilliijllillililifilliillilillif, . I · 1. ' ·u.-·. . i Cash Fundliew LIcens, 2,1-·, t<n. 44. i Kt -C . f i.'......4* Cash Fund Tiansler Licinsi ·· · ~ w)%, *p, w , *...1:„ JOTAE:5 -' :·fri 14.00 ' . .: 4 "s e .:.:42300-100 :: -~ ·itte...,·,A ....·A .t:,c 'i·; &*r· ~fl-':w,·i:g310-100 - 2 3.'+ I ..~· 4 - ' u#'·7~·'Ar..3 - ., 0 *€,-f>·: .t,if: 4:22 2'~ ~.>1.:~·,~~
DR 8404 (05/98) Page 3 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stock- Yes No holders or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of t*enty-one years? m GY.- 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation) or manager ever (in Colorado or any other state); (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? 0 9 (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 0 G- (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? ' ~ CIP - I f you answered yes td 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8a. Has a liquor license application (same license class), that was located within 500 feet of the proposed premises, been denied within the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. 8b. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been denied within the preceding one year? If »yes," explain in detail. 0 9./ 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or private school that meets compulsory education requirements of m [2' Colorado law, or the principal campus of any college, university or seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a ~C] limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify tpe name of the business and list any current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. ~q lies.k Dos Ala,\KA 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 2 of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that / this license will be isptled by virtue of ownership, lease or other arrangement? Id El C Ownership E Lease D Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landlordand tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Leord _Imant Expires -)(e.-rra- R) Cm , LLC_ .b"c,~ 1-rinida.A.Clon70(p 7 0511*yi Attach a diagram and outline the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, brewery, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11". (Doesn't have ·to be to scale) 12. Who, besides the owners listed in this application (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies), will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME DATE OF BIRTH FEIN OR SSN INTEREST Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement, or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc.) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises Yes No A local ordinance or resolution authorizing optional premises has been adopted. m m Number of separate Optional Premises areas requested 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. El El 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and 00 not for pecuniary gain? (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is 00 operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) , to be licensed as a club? (Three years required) 16. Brew-Pub License Applicants answer the following: (a) Has the applicant received or applied for a Federal Brewers Notice? 00 (Copy of notice or application must be attached) Date of Birth 17a. Name of Manager (If this is an application for a Hotel, Restaurant or Tavern License, the manager must also submit an Individual History Record (DR 8404-1). 17b. Does this manager act as the manager of, or have a financial interest in, any other liquor Yes No licensed establishment in the State of Colorado? If yes, provide name, type of license and account number. m El 18. Tax Distraint Information. Does the applicant or any other person listed on this application and including its partners, officers, Yes No // directors, stockholders, members (LLC) or managing members (LLC) and any other persons with a 10% or greater financial interest 0 9 in the applicant currently have an outstanding tax distraint issued to them by the Colorado Department of Revenue? If yes, provide an explanation and include copies of any payment agreements.
DR 8404 (05/98) Page 4 19. If applicant is a corporation, partnership, association or a limited liability company, it is required to list by position all officers and directors, i general partners, managing members, all stockholders, partners (including limited partners) and members who have a 10% or greater financial interest in the applicant. All persons listed here or by attachment must submit and attach a DR 8404-1 (Individual History Record) and provide fingerprint cards to their local licensing authority. DATE OF POSITION % OWNED NAME HOME ADDRESS, CITY & STATE BIRTH Additional Documents to be submitted by type of entity El CORPORATION El Cert. of Incorp. El Cert. of Good Standing (if more than 2 yrs. old) ~ Cert. of Auth. (if a foreign corp.) ~ PARTNERSHIP El Partnership Agreement (General or Limited) ~ Husband and Wife partnership (no written agreement) ~ LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY U Articles of Organization El Cert. of Authority (if foreign company) El Operating Agrmt. 0 U ASSOCIATION OR OTHER Attach copy of agreements creating association or relationship between the parties Registered Agent (if applicable) Address for Service 5 1:.,1, C<.4 , 1,41.... ·t.·D ·4:~·'...t>-4.2. a.:'6 ·.4·:r .: 4-:-1, & ': ~ = ='~~ :.'~~'.~t~~ . ·: .-<21"~.:'4·= 25 ·. „ C ~~ .'~0<·*- - ~OA¥A- .OF APPLiCAN¥·j..~.41, I ,@ 1==1% .., ti.:.·· -..: I declare Under pdnalty of pdrju,9 in th@ §4cohd debree thht this.application and ali 'attachments are trud, corract,: and ®*ple* to'~the best of My kNowledgi l yalho ti@howledge that it isimy t*pon¢bility and thi rdsponsibility of my agents And employpest >to domply-with tne provisions of thd Coldradol.iquor or Bueri Code wljioh affect my liceAse.· .4 .4 4.-/ .. a .?:. :r .,t, 7 ....0 7 - 4 . ..i $ ··I, E f. ·irj Authorized Signature Title Date 41'rutelqd 06- 24 I-2 9-01-1 4-S- O 2- 1 2>:"' . 713 . i. .3. ...:. K « 2.1.~t .,1 1-» 7 ~.34 -te ' , .3» " ./ I r , 4 ' 1,' REPORT,AND APPROVAL OE LOCAkLICENSING AUTHORITY (CITWCOUNTY1 s. 0 · ion filed with local authority Date of local authority hearing (for new license applicants; cannot be less than 30 days from date of,ppplication 12-47-311 (1)) C.R.S. £ 5, 2001, 7»ay / 46 ¢200 L f Each person required to file DR 8404-1: Yes No a. Has been fingerprinted m El b. Background investigation and NCIC and CCIC check for outstanding warrants conducted 00 c. The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. 00 If 'no", the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do reportthatsuch license, if granted, will meetthe reasonable requirements of the neighborhood andthe desires of the adult inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority for Telephone Number ~ TOWN, CITY U COUNTY Signature Title Date ignature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerkto the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official.
DR 8404-1 (02/94) dOLORAbO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1575 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Dlame of BusineA Date Social Security Number(s) CascA larande- Retican 11 6.54(11(21,-1- O£-IC 03~r>2 (Poq-01 - 953-01 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) L -* onzn 1 e .2_ --392~9< . 1 r midaot ,- 4. Mailing Address (if different from )esidence) Home Telephone 90 60* 28(08 t -66-1-:a klrk C.O. 5(35 19 (»03 -9-8@- 9938 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) & 10 609+ 8 I khe,rn Auence- Es·Ics ParK Of). %05 19 6. Date of Birth Plage of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? , 04-oa- Iciuct I M 6% i c,D GAes E No If Naturalized, state where When l ~ Name of U.S. District Court A i ask« 09- / C Rh 9 Naturalifation Certificate Number Date of Certificate If an Alieh, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number Aq@a844 Oct Ni~ 1 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Driver's License? If yes, give number, & state 9 8" 00014 6-0 6ro Plot 4, 1-1 Egan i 6 [2~Yes m No (A 38400 Alaska- Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment J~A- NIA 1 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) Business Telephone MIlA. N ~A- 13. Present Position 3-0 1 F- -f den p { el.~ eci 14. Marital Status 15. Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) H arrI, <_Gl Unrict (ll,adali,pe. Re,r~e-| 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth 0408* C 4(09 11 el€ (r o 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 18. Spouse's Present Employer ,@ccup*n 16)A bel + - €/enlp louted 19. Aclqress of Spouse's Present Employer MIA 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail D Yes Ljt No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE
DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not include traffic , violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your driver's license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) If yes, explain in detail. E Yas [Emo 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. DYes [240 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial' Number Type of Discharge NIA 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO tost Anaard Ad # 8 l.Oct ·bi I la < A 654<Pi 99(f]54 4~Iq93 A-e~A# J 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO 5,0 (0 9 Wn-p [of.,jrd Ap 64-auran-+ OLene.,r 1 qq 3 7 resen+ 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) £ (A 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned AbLA 29. If partner, state whether El General U Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount $ 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account $ 9 0~ 00]0.00 000586 59 1 3-ose -Undida d Annp.a & 7 $ $ $ 0;*.-4*129 74; .4,4:71*44*Z3* 114'.41, 61„7 4ZOat@bf Applicante.:4..:fl&,9, 7~; .··i.,~' ;4.·..4.t + .12. ti.Z·*yl? 74 - £,~„ ,; *. *.hn-:·7. I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title Date _3 -lt) M ZA A 6 4 2 4 /el- Il,; 1 9-5-01
dea, 6lrind 6 1/1 ex i ba-n~*5414 r, 2/0 *-1 6£<146yn Aut Kitchen £ 1 Pref Me i 1 1 1r 1 1 -4 L t it (po uble Pos,4 Iln ,*-1- 140 e . y i:J 1 ·1 J« 97'443 4 14v €- r mit l.3
AGREEMENT This Agreementbetween the Friends of Stanley Hall, Inc., a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation ("FOSH") and the Town of Estes Park (the "Town") made this day of , 2002. WITNESSETH l. FOSH was organized in 199_ for the purpose of soliciting funding for the purpose of supporting the cultural and performing arts within the Estes Park Area. 2. As part of the above stated purpose, FOSH solicited and obtained funds for the renovation of Stanley Hall. 3. Due to factors beyond the control of FOSH and the Town, Stanley Hall is not available for renovation by the Town and FOSH. 34 4. FOSH has atits disposal approximately $48>/317-FOSH wishesto makethese funds available to the Town for use by the Town for the promotion and development of cultural and performing arts within the Estes Valley. 5. The Town is willing to accept these funds pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE RECITALS AND FOR OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Within 30 days oftly date of this Agreement, FOSH shall transferto the Town the sum 04475,435-*Said funds shall be transferred to the Town by FOSH free and clear of any claims, liens, or encumbrances. The funds transferred shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. The Town agrees to accept said funds from FOSH. Upon receipt of the funds, the Town shall segregate these funds from all other funds of the Town.
, 3. The Town shall use said funds as follows: a. As partial funding for the design and construction of a facility for the presentation of performing arts. Said facility may be a part of or combined with other uses in a multi-purpose facility. Said facility may be either an indoor or partially enclosed facility. The Town may be the sole owner or lessee of the facility and/or the Town may partner with another entity for the design, construction, and operation of the facility. b. The Town shall have four (4) years from the date of this Agreement to determine whether or notthe facility, as described in paragraph (a) above is feasible. Said decision shall be in the sole discretion of the Town. If the Town does determine within said four (4) year period that such a facility is feasible, the Town shall have a total of seven (7) years from the date of this Agreement to design and substantially complete construction of said facility and use the FOSH funds for said facility. c. In the event the Town determines, within the original four (4) year period, that a facility is not feasible, the Town then shall have the following options with regard to the funds. 1) Donate the funds to any nonprofit organization whose primary focus is within the Estes Valleyand whose nonprofit purpose involves the performing arts. 2) If the Town determines, in its sole discretion, that there is no appropriate organization within the Estes Valley which provides support for the performing arts, the Town may donate the funds to such an organization located within the Northern Colorado area. 4. All of the funds shall be disposed of by the Town pursuant to this Agreement within seven (7) years of the date of this Agreement. 5. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties. Any amendments or modifications hereto shall be in writing and executed by both parties. 6. In the event of any defaultby either party in the terms and conditions hereof, the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party ten (10) days' notice in writing of said default. If said default is notcured within said 10-day period, the -2-
non-defaulting party shall be entitled to begin legal proceedings, including an action for specific performance and/or damages. Damages shall include all reasonable attorneys fees and court costs incurred by the non-defaulting party. 7. All notices, demands or other documents required or desired to be given, made or sentto either party, under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be deemed effective upon mailing or personal delivery. If mailed, said notice shall be mailed, postage prepaid as follows: Town of Estes Park Friends of St#@ey Hall n Attn: Town Administrator Attn·. 'l611 a£77-r-,A,Ao P.O. Box 1200 #43| Aflttkiet• 'D , Estes Park, Colorado 80517 2-34=stkrk, 20 80-5-1 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these parties hereby execute this Agreement. 794 Ds OF STANLEY HALL, INC. lf-w / By: TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: ATTEST: TOWN CLERK -3-
. 'I . MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Randy Repola -,42- I)ate: May 10, 2002 Subject: Employee Home Ownership Program Proposal Background: At the April 9th Town Board meeting, the Employee Home Ownership program was introduced. Board discussion indicated that additional detail was needed before a decision could be made regarding the proposal. Since then staff has conducted a survey of employees to gain additional knowledge related to their housing circumstances. The Town currently has 97 permanent employees. Approximately 64%, or 62 employees responded to the survey. Survey results are segmented into various groups and findings are presented below. In addition, two charts are attached representing interest level among employees. Of all respondents, 92% currently live within the area (defined as the Estes Park Light & Power service area). Additionally, 75% of all respondents own their home. Ofthe 25% that live outside the defined area, four live in the Loveland area and one in Fort Collins. Employees renting homes live both within and outside of the area. Twelve employees (86%) live in the area. Of the fourteen employees that rent, four (29%) indicated a high level of interest in the proposed program and seven (50%) are moderately interested. Finally, three had no interest at all. In consideration of maximizing this program and given the desire to encourage home ownership, staffrecommends participation in this program be required of any employee living in Town-owned rental housing. Budget/Cost: Program cost is is variable. The Town's cost per participating employee would be $1,800 per year. The funding source would be General Fund which includes the revenue generated by the the rental properties. Given the limited impact of the program during the first year, adequate funds are currently available in 2002 and would be addressed in future budgets based upon participation levels. Recommendation: Staff recommends consideration ofthe Employee Home Ownership Program for Town of Estes Park employees.
6 -1 EF It.% ty-F'"F
.,1.10..6-1.haw'6'/,-u,- 1,: , lus.11
- 6 Employee Home Ownership Program Purpose: Enable Town of Estes Park employees to purchase homes in the Estes area thereby reducing employee turnover and related costs to the Town. Resources: The Town currently owns six rental units. The properties consist o f four houses and one duplex. The houses consist of two each of two-bedroom and three- bedroom houses and vary in square footage. One house is at the Fallriver hydro plant and the remaining three are at the Fish Hatchery. The duplex units are a one-bedroom and a two-bedroom unit. Rental rates in these units are currently below market rates. Program: Establish a lease agreement with a maximum length o f five years. Set rental rates $150 below market values. For each month that an employee is in the unit, the Town shall set aside $150 of the rent in an employee account. This monthly amount will serve as a fund to be used towards a down payment on the purchase of a home by the employee in the Estes Park area (defined as the Light and Power service area). The Town shall establish an internal fund that is funded from the rents collected from employee house rentals. The Town shall credit the fund $150 per month that each participating employee resides in a rental unit and participates in the program. At the end of five years, or sooner, the employee may request payment ofthe funds for a qualified purchase. The Town shall issue the funds payable to the title company handling the purchase closing. Town funds may not be used for earnest money. In the event that an employee withdraws from the program, this money remains the property o f the Town. The Employee and the Town shall establish a joint savings account. The employee will pay into this account. Deposits shall be made to the account each payday. The deposit shall be an electronic transfer funded by a deduction from the employee's paycheck. The minimum amount of the deposit shall be $95 per pay period ($2470 annually). Withdrawals from this account shall require two signatures: the employee and a representative of the Town. These funds may be withdrawn for use as earnest money; however, the employee must provide documentation of the use such as a copy ofa signed contract. Due to the nature of contract submittal, the employee may provide documentation three business days following acceptance of the contract by the selling party. A withdrawal from this account for any reason other than as purchase money for a home in the designated area shall cause the termination of the program agreement. Eligibility: In 2001, the median purchase price of a single-family home in the Estes Park area was $257,500. The monthly mortgage payment for a $257,500 home with a 10% down payment would be approximately $1542.00 (assuming a 7% loan on $231,750). In order to qualify for the payment on this loan, an individual would have to earn at least $4672.00 per month. Any non-probationary employee who is in pay grades 1-56 is eligible to enter the program.