The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1995-08-22BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, August 22, 1995 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated August 8, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, August 17, 1995. B. Planning Commission, August 15, 1995 (acknowledgement only). C. Amended Plat of Lot 2, Tanton Subdivision, Dave Tanton/Applicant - Continue to September 12, 1995. D. Final Plat of Tracts 96A and 96B, Placid Lake Subdivision, J. R. and Rachael Preston/Applicant - Continue to September 12, 1995. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Planning Commission Items: A. Manske Addition - Zoning decision, Ordinance #14-95. B. Special Review of Development Plan #95-8, Tract 19, Beaver Point, Second Addition, A-1 Trash/Applicant. C. Fish Creek Addition Annexation (formerly submitted as Waterbury Addition). Continue to September 26, 1995 (due to continuance by the Planning Commission at their meeting August 15, 1995). D. Public Hearing. Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates, Second Filing, Richard & Ann Barlow/Applicant. E. Public Hearing. Amended Plat of Lot 2, James Subdivision, Tad & Dean Wariner/Applicant. F. Resolution #22-95. Finding the Mignery Addition eligible for annexation, referring same to the Planning Commission for their consideration and recommendation. G. Petition to Rezone Portion of Storer Ranch Addition. 2. Introduction of Ordinances adopting the 1994 Edition of Uniform Building Codes. 3. Special Event Liquor Permit. Sunrise Rotary Club - Autumn Gold Event, September 23 and 24, 1995, Bond Park - Approval. 4. Resolution #23-95 - Approving Ballot Title for Park Entrance Estates S.I.D. (election November 7, 1995). 1 5. Estes Valley Library District - Resignation of Steven Little and re-appointment of Barbara Ludwig, completion of 4-yr. term, expiring December 31, 1995. 6. Town Administrator's Report: A. B. 2 Town Of ESteS Park, Larimer county, colorado, . August .8. . . ., 19.95 . Regular 1 Minuteâ€¢ of a........ meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . Pth. . day of ... .Auguet. .., A.D., 19.95 . at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor ......................... Present: Mayor Trustees: H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, Stephen W. Gillette, William J. Marshall, Also Present: Michael E. Miller, Gary F. Klaphake, J. Donald Pauley Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Vickie O'Connor, Â»010*: Town Clerk Absent: None Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. 1 PUBLIC INPUT. Louis O' Riordan expressed his opposition to the Advertising Budget; US West should be allowed to complete their upgrade project; he has : not released his lawsuit against the Town regarding .the deed ! restriction on Stanley Park; and the name of the fairgrounds should be returned to Stanley Park Fairgrounds. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated July 25, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, August 3, 1995. 4. Sunrise Rotary Club - Autumn Gold Event, September 23 and 24, 1995, Bond Park - Motion Authorizing Town Clerk to Post the Premises. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Park Entrance Estates - Special Improvement District (SID). Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing. Town Attorney White read an Ordinance authorizing the improvements to be made for the SID. In order to finance the acquisition and construction of the improvements, the Town will seek approval of the issuance of Special Assessment Bonds. Public Works Director Linnane provided the following for the official record of proceedings: A. Map - indicating all lots within the special improvement district, a total of 37. , B. Preliminary Construction/Design Drawings. C. Cost of Improvements - Roadway = $16,600:t/lot; and Water (Block 2 only) = $8,2001/lot. Board of Trustees - August 8, 1995 - Page 2 D. Assessment/Lot - Block 1 and 2 Roadway = $1,500:E/yr./lot at 6.75% Interest - at 8% Interest, the cost would be $1,650*/yr./lot. Block 2 Water = $1,1501/yr./lot at 6.75% Interest - at 8% Interest, the cost would be $1,300*/yr./lot. E. Special Benefit - Pursuant to discussions with financial institutions, Jack Kneer and Naomi Williams, the market value from the proposed improvements Will be greater than the assessment/lot. Robert Murphy/Park Entrance Water shareholder agreed with Director Linnane regarding special benefit statements, and requested voter clarification. Attorney White responded that pursuant to the provisions.of Section 31-25-534(3) C.R.S., only Colorado registered electors who are owners of property within or residents of the District shall be eligible to vote on the ballot question. Staff reported there were no written objections filed, and that the bonds will be placed locally. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Doylen) Ordinance #12-95 be approved, including Items A-E above, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted, ordered it numbered 12-95 and published according to law. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall) the Town Clerk be authorized to begin the process of placing the bond issue on the November 7, 1995 ballot, and it passed unanimously. Attorney White read a Resolution, which includes an Agreement with Larimer County to conduct a coordinated election, and it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Pauley) Resolution #20-95 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2.A. Manske Addition Annexation. Glen & Margaret Manske/Applicant. Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing. Annexation. Director Stamey advised that Town Board consideration includes two requests: annexation and zoning. The annexation consists of a 1.54-acre site, located west of Brook Drive. The Applicants requested R-M Multi-family zoning which would allow up to twelve units. Pursuant to the submission of a petition opposing the R-M Multi-family zoning, staff read a portion of the state statute that requires a total of five affirmative votes to.pass the zoning. Colored maps were displayed that indicated land use, zoning and the residents opposing the zoning. Current Larimer County zoning is E-Estate, and the Planning Commission has recommended R-S zoning which would allow up to three single-family lots or two duplex lots. Attorney White confirmed that should the Applicant oppose R-S zoning, such was not grounds to withdraw the annexation. Those speaking "in favor" of the Annexation: Bill Van Horn, Applicant' s representative. There being no further testimony, Attorney White read the Annexation Resolution, and it was moved and seconded (Pauley/Gillette) Resolution #21-95, finding the area eligible for annexation be approved, and it passed unanimously. Attorney White read the Annexation Ordinance, and it was moved and seconded (Pauley/Dekker) Ordinance #13-95 be approved, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance dulypassed and adopted, ordered it numbered #13-95, and published according to law. Zoning. Applicant' s Representative Van Horn reported that the Applicant has expended time, money and effort on this project Board of Trustees - August 8. 1995 - Page 3 which has been based upon the character of the neighborhood. A 12-unit development with garages and buffer (trees) is being proposed. Renderings of Buildings 1, 2, and 3 were displayed, and two trees will be removed. This area was originally annexed as S. St. Vrain Addition and it has evolved into a mixed-use area of the golf course, accommodations, multi- family, and industrial. The area is not a single-family neighborhood and this development will not create a spot-zone as it abuts R-M multi-family which is what the Applicant is requesting. The nearby Park Ridge Apartments contain 30 units and the St. Vrain Quarters contain 12 units and there is no evidence of any complaints for these developments. With regard to traffic, the industrial area is yet to be fully developed, however, there could be intense use at that location; this project will generate an insignificant amount of traffic in relation to existing uses. The Talmey Drake survey listed the number one community concern is growth and housing. Multiple housing is needed, the decision is where to place it; if projects are denied based upon community opposition, these projects will not occur. A quality project is being presented, which will enhance the neighborhood and will not diminish property values. Mr. Van Horn presented slides taken from the property identifying a bed and breakfast operation, mature landscaping, tepee (Avalon Dr.), industrial area, Park Ridge Apartments, Masonic Lodge, and St. Vrain Quarters. Staff confirmed that when the site was purchased, it was zoned E-Estate in the County. Mr. Van Horn confirmed that condominiums for purchase are being proposed, and the ' Applicant anticipates a significant percentage of permanent use. In addition, each unit will be 14-1800 sq. ft. Those speaking in opposition to the R-M Zoning: Mrs. Harold Allen, 1750 S. St. Vrain (offered an ownership history of the area which was originally 20-acres, and commented that the proposal will result in a loss of property values and privacy). Franklin Burke, 1770 S. St. Vrain (was assured when he purchased the property 14 years ago, that E-Estate would " not allow anything other than single-family development and - multiple-family built as single homes; concern with the development being 100' from his back door, and view corridor). Jeannette Villers, Acacia/Brook Dr., (received confirmation from the Town that a bed and breakfast cannot board more than five guests at one time, and disagreed with the statement on potential growth of the industrial area). Lynda Vogel, 1129 Brook Dr. (the petition dated June 7, 1995 contained 45 signatures, and she presented three additional signatures for a total of 48; presented a colored map representing the 48 property owners; current zoning is E-Estate on two sides of the proposed development, and single-family on the other two sides. Residents understand there are mixed uses, however, they do not desire that such uses be increased; the development will have a negative impact on the quality of life, wildlife habitat, traffic, drainage; with six buildings there will be 24 vehicles or more on 1.54 acres, and public safety concerns). Margaret Clark, President/EVIA, (she and the Vice President met with the homeowners and support their opposition to R-M zoning). Austin Condon, 1849 Ranch Cir. and EVIA (even good plans are bad if placed in the wrong place; the site was zoned E-Estate for 15 years and residents have relied on this zoning; reliance on the Comprehensive Plan; the Planning Commission recommended R-S zoning; there has been no new evidence presented by the Applicant in support of R-M zoning). Sally Burke Badali, 1041 Acacia Dr. (recalled previous letters written in opposition to the R-M zoning; commented on public safety concerns with this proposal and the CDOT Highway 7 widening project, and confirmed that the tents placed at the Masonic Lodge were temporary during Bible School). Jeannie Tippen, 1641 Avalon (the condominiums are Board of Trustees - August 8, 1995 - Page 4 , not good for the neighborhood). Gaylord Villers, 1720 Avalon (he circulated the petition and not one resident objected to signing it; the bed and breakfast is not a detriment to the neighborhood). In rebuttal, Mr. Van Horn commented on his professional/client relationship, understanding of the concerns expressed by the residents, a 25' setback is being proposed, housing is needed in Estes Park, fencing will not be installed, drainage and Code conformance are considered under Special Review not annexation, and the site was zoned County E-Estate by default. Bill Swim, 1660 Clover Ln., commented on the concrete plant, the Planning Commission recommendation of R-S, and concern with density. Trustee comments included: an increase in density of 400 or 1200% relative to control of growth/density; suitability of the site; dependability of the county E-Estate zoning, and Comprehensive Plan land use recommendations for this site, which is low density, 1/2 acre lots. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. Attorney White read the Zoning Ordinance. Trustee Miller reiterated his comments relative to the increase of density; Trustee Doylen noted that the R-S zone was consistent with the neighborhood, and Trustee Pauley questioned whether E-Estate would be best. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Dekker) Manske Addition be zoned R-S Residential. Motion failed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen and Gillette. Those voting "No" Trustees Marshall, Miller and Pauley. Staff confirmed that state statute requires that a zoning decision be made within 90 days of the public hearing. Mr. Van Horn questioned whether five affirmative votes were required if the Board approved R-S zoning. Attorney White responded five affirmative votes are required pursuant to state statute, and that building permits could not be issued until the property is zoned. Administrator Klaphake reported that in conversations with residents it appeared the neighborhood is not opposed to R-S zoning. Margaret Manske stated that the previous owner of the property was advised of the Applicant's proposal for multi- family development; the project consists of well-planned condominium homes (not transients), neighborhood concerns were considered in the plans, and the project will be an asset to the community. When questioned whether the neighborhood would accept R-S zoning, Ms. Vogel responded that R-S was acceptable. Following additional comments, it was moved and seconded (Miller/Pauley) Manske Addition be zoned E-Estate. Motion failed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Marshall, Miller and Pauley. Those voting "No" Trustees Dekker, Doylen and Gillette. Whereupon, it was moved and seconded (Pauley/Gillette) the zoning decision by Town Board be continued to August 22, 1995, and it passed unanimously. Mayor Dannels declared a five-minute recess at 9:34 P.M. Mayor Dannels reconvened the meeting at 9:39 P.M. B. Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates. Second Filing. Richard & Ann Barlow/Applicant. Acting upon the Applicant' s request, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Final Plat be continued to August 22, 1995, and it passed unanimously. C. Amended Plat of Lot 2, James Subdivision, Tad & Dean Wariner/Applicant. Acting upon the Applicant's request, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Amended Plat be continued to August 22, 1995 , and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees - August 8, 1995 - Page 5 3. Slurrv Seal Proiect (Portion Of 1995 Street Improvement Program Budget) - Request Approval to Expend $50.000. In a memorandum dated August 2, 1995, Manager Sievers reported that the 1995 Budget contains $150,000 for the annual street improvement project, and, due to scheduling, this item is being brought directly to the Town Board in lieu of the Public Works Committee meeting scheduled August 24. Staff is proposing to use one-third of this budget toward the application of Type II Slurry Seal. The slurry seal will be applied to 3.5 miles of local streets; this material can extend the life of a street and delay the costs of an overlay for up to seven years. The following bids were received: Quality Resurfacing Co. ............... $36,400 Inter-Mountain Resurfacing ............ 49,200 Staff is also requesting the quantities be increased to 54,945 sq. yds. for a total expenditure of $50,000. Staff confirmed that a previous slurry application on a portion of Community Dr. did not meet Town standards due to the improper balance of chemicals, and as the project was guaranteed, the Town did not Pay for this section. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Dekker) the low bid submitted by Quality Resurfacing Co. be accepted, authorizing staff to increase quantities, for a total 1995 Budget expenditure of $50,000, and it passed unanimously. 4. Marva Lake Lodge Grant Application - Authorization to Sponsor Colorado Historical Societv Grant for Roof Rehabilitation. Administrator Klaphake presented the grant application, confirming that sponsorship will not require any expenditure of Town funds. This application is similar to the recent award given to The Stanley Hotel by the Society. The grant application does not stipulate that properties must be located inside Town limits for Town Board support, and staff anticipates future requests from other properties. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Pauley) the Town sponsor the Marya Lake Lodge Grant Application as presented, and it passed unanimously. 5. Resignation of Frank Hix from the Museum Advisorv Board, effective August 22. 1995. Expressing the Town' s appreciation for many of service, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall) the resignation of Frank Hix from the Museum Advisory Board be accepted, and it passed unanimously. 6. Town Administrator' s Report: A. Administrator Klaphake presented a Review Schedule Calendar for adoption of the updated Comprehensive Plan. The schedule includes meetings with the Media, Open Houses, Work Sessions with the Planning Commission, Larimer County Board of Commissioners, Town Board, and joint public hearings. Staff anticipates adoption on January 22, 1996. B. Staff called attention to the Community Development Meeting minutes dated August 3, 1995 pertaining to tracking of the Conference Center. Renovations are being scheduled for several accommodations, including The Stanley Hotel and Holiday Inn. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 9:53 P.M. Mayor Dannels convened the Estes Park Housing Authority at 9:54 P.M. 1. Lone Tree Apartments Proiect, 1310 Manford Ave.: Ass't. Administrator Widmer reported that Commissioner Doylen, Board of Trustees - August 8, 1995 - Page 6 Community Capital Corp. and he formed an Architect Selection Committee. RFPs were received from four architects who had low-income housing experience, and the following were interviewed: A. Fishkin + Associates B. Patrick W. Nook & Company C. Aller Lingle Architects. The Committee is recommending Fishkin + Associates be selected as the Project Architect for Lone Tree Apartments, for a not- to-exceed fee of $60,875.00. Attorney White has reviewed the contract and will be modifying it slightly. The Lone Tree Apartment Project has been awarded a $150,000 Federal Home Loan Bank subsidy which will be administered by Park National Bank. Due to a change in the FHLB rules, this money will not be available for Project use until the construction loan closes in Spring, 1996. Due to cash flow - requirements of the Project, it will be necessary for the Housing Authority to arrange short-term financing. Staff is recommending the Authority enter into negotiations with Mercy Housing, Inc., sponsored by the Sisters of Mercy. A representative from the Mercy Loan Fund has inspected the site and, unofficially, the Project qualifies for a $150,000 loan at 6% interest for 12 months. This type of financing was anticipated and incorporated into the originalÂ· Project budget, there will be no increase in Project costs, and it is a path to fund soft costs and bridge the financing gap. The preliminary schedule and budget were reviewed. Responding to questions concerning collateral, and TABOR compliance, staff advised that official documents have not yet been received to confirm collateral, and as the Housing Authority has no taxing power, it is exempt from TABOR. It is yet to be determined whether the site may have to be transferred from the Town to the Authority. In addition, fee proposals of $136,000* for Nook, and $176,000* for Lingle were identified. All three architectural firms were highly qualified. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) fee, not-to-exceed $60,875 submitted by Fishkin + Associates be accepted, and that the Authority be authorized to enter into negotiations with Mercy Housing, Inc. for the loan, authorizing the Chairman and Secretary to execute the appropriate documents, as long as the final terms and conditions are in substantial compliance as presented, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Gillette, Marshall, and Pauley. Those voting "No" Trustee Miller. Trustee Dekker requested a brochure be prepared that will provide all pertinent facts of the Project. Trustee Miller requested information on exactly who the Authority believes will reside at Lone Tree Apartments and how they will be selected. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 10:10 P.M. H. B. Dannels, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk ' BRADFORD Pulalll/ING co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee August 17, 1995 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Acting Police Chief Repola, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT. Personnel/Patrol. Acting Chief Repola introduced new officer Scott Roth who began his employment on August 15. Mr. Roth is from the Kit Carson County area. The Committee welcomed Officer Roth. Officers Rose and Rowe are completing their training, and they are now on the work schedule; Darren Brand is approximately one-third of the way through his training; and the Police Department now has a fullÂ· compliment of officers. Staff confirmed that Estes park's tourist area is taken into consideration in interview sessions; customer- oriented skills are important and very helpful. The Department Will review this component to verify its effectiveness. All four officers recently hired were rated within a fraction of each other. Personnel/Secretary Position. Acting Chief Repola is reviewing a plan to shift the workload. There is currently one employee in Records, and backlog is an on-going problem. Staff is proposing to increase the workload for the secretary by acting as an alternate for Records. Copies of reports at times come to a standstill. There is an opening in the Communications Center, and it appears it would be more efficient and urgent to fill the need in Records. The Contract with Rocky .Mountain Business Services will be reduced; however, typing services will still be provided. This plan will not result in an increase in the total number of Department employees. The job title will be amended to Police Secretary/Records Technician, which is not uncommon within Police Departments. Administrator Klaphake requested and received confirmation that this plan will not negatively impact double staffing for peak loading in the Communications Center. Department personnel are continuing their staffing discussions, particularly relative to E-911 and the forthcoming Emergency Medical Dispatch which may require additional staffing. Acting Chief Repola will return to the Committee with a report. Communications training is currently 6-8 weeks in length; with the technology involved today, the training period, which will include patrol officers, will be increased in the near future. The E-911 emergency line is also receiving calls for fire, the highway "call boxes", and RMNP. Citizen Concerns/Kip Baker. Mr. Baker reported on an incident at Riverside Plaza involving two Estes Park Officers (acting on separate time-frames), a Larimer County Sheriffs Officer and young adult. In Mr. Baker's opinion, the young adult was mis-treated by the Sheriff, and possibly by the second Police Officer. Mr. Baker stated his primary concern is how young adults are being dealt with. He does not agree with Officers warning juveniles that they will face a $100 fine if they BMAOFORE PUmt-ImMING COÂ· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS public Safety Committee - August 17, 1995 - Page 2 congregate in Riverside Plaza for their varied activities, as the Plaza is a public park. Mr. Baker agreed that the Plaza, prior to high visibility by the Department, was becoming an area for young adults to congregate, causing obstruction of public passageways. The Department has had a positive influence in this area, and they are encouraging the youth to use Bond Park for groups to play music. Some juveniles participated in a drum circle at 6:00 P.M. in Bond Park, when most businesses were closed. The juveniles, as well as tourists, enjoyed the music. In discussions with the youth, Mr. Baker is attempting to acquire the juveniles assistance in cleaning up debris for "their park", and thus far, response has been very positive. Acting Chief Repola noted that as he was unaware of statements presumably made by certain personnel, this item is difficult to address at this time. In addition, the Plaza contains varied uses and the Department attempts to accommodate all those uses. In general, the Department's approach is that Riverside Plaza is available for use by all persons; however, if the use infringes upon others, the Department will take enforcement action. Acting Chief Repola will review this incident and review his findings with the Committee. Chairman Gillette expressed his appreciation to Mr. Baker for his concern/comments. Youth Crime Prevention and Intervention. As reported in June, a grant application requesting $4,500 for this Program was submitted. The Department was notified that initial response was positive and that Estes Park is a finalist. Funding will assist in providing training for instructors. Support for this Program has been received from the EVRPD and Larimer County Human Resource Department. Grant award confirmation should be received in the near future. FIRE DEPARTMENT. Fire Lanes/School. Fire Chief Rumley reported that the Park School District has approached the Department on marking fire lanes at the middle and high schools, with subsequent tow-away enforcement. Following discussion, the Committee recommends the Clerk advise the School District to submit a letter requesting said enforcement on their private property. With proper signage, as confirmed by Traffic Engineer Linnane, the Police Department would enforce the fire lane tow-away zone. Staff noted that an education/training period will precede enforcement activities. Training Facility. Chief Rumley reported that the tower is nearing completion at the training facility site, located near the former Light & Power Shop. To facilitate after-hour training, the Department is requesting underground electric service. The Department has discussed this request with Light and Power and the plan involves underground service from the former shop to the training facility, tapping into the existing electric meter. Licensed electricians on the Fire Department would obtain a permit and perform the work. Estes Park hosted the Brigsdale Fire Dept. at the training site and, in return, Brigsdale will be providing needed materials at no cost. The Committee recommends Administrator Klaphake meet with the Light and Power Department to provide electric service to the training facility, contingent upon the line being installed outside existing asphalt. Fire Station Site. Staff reported discussions are in progress â€¢ ....FORO PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - August 17, 1995 - Page 3 relative to the Fire Station Site. Natural Gas Response Calls/Reimbursement. Pursuant to the downsizing of personnel in PSCO, the Fire Dept. is receiving a number of natural gas leak calls due to Psco's response time of 2-4 hours. The Fire Department responds as natural gas is considered a hazardous material. The Department desires to recover their costs and invoice Psco. Invoices would only be initiated for any facilities owned by Psco. Where a potential natural gas leak is within a private structure, the Department disconnects gas service and directs the occupants to vacate the premises for a set period of time. The Committee recommends the Clerk notify PSCo. of the Fire Department's intent to invoice as described above. Hazmat Budget. Chief Rumley requested a budget line item for hazmat materials. Administrator Klaphake will address this item by adding a contingency in the Budget. The citizenry is advised that the Fire Dept. Will continue to seek contributions for general operation of the Dept. Hazmat Recertification Training. Ass't. Chief Ford will be conducting hazmat recertification classes on Tuesday, August 22 at 7:00 P.M. for all affected employees. REPORTS. Staff reviewed the Quarterly Report for the second quarter. Animal offenses, which are primarily dogs, have increased. Brief discussion followed on the enforcement in the Post Office Parking Lot. Responding to a citizen, Acting Chief Repola advised that a fine of $10.00 is issued for illegal parking in handicapped parking spaces. With adoption of the revised Traffic Code, this fine is anticipated to increase to approximately $25.00. Staff reported that the plantings (bulbs) in the Highway 34/36 Intersection island will be relocated which should improve traffic visibility. Discussions are continuing with the EVRPD, Larimer County Sheriffs Dept. and the Police Dept. on jurisdiction, relative to the Lake Estes Hike/Bike Trail. Staff reviewed correspondence received from James Smid advising that he was well satisfied with the quickness of response relative to Riverside Plaza; and summarized additional correspondence from the Courage Classic; Scandinavian Fest; and Womans Club. Chairman Gillette also read a letter from Mr. Smid commending Repola, Filsinger, and others. Staff noted that negative correspondence, when received, is generally received with parking tickets fines. Chairman Gillette referred a letter from John Adams concerning a suggestion for traffic congestion on Rockwell St./E. Riverside Dr., dated August 15, 1995 to Traffic Engineer Linnane. Following completion of all agenda items, and acting upon staff request, the Public Safety Committee consented to enter Executive Session to discuss personnel issues. There being no further business, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 9:05 A.M. to Executive Session. Chairman Gillette reconvened the Public Safety Committee at 9:45 A.M. Personnel. Based upon his efforts, particularly during the last four months as Acting Police Chief, the Committee BRAOFORO PUILISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - August 17, 1995 - Page 4 unanimously recommends Randy Repola be appointed Police Chief at the September 12, 1995 Town Board meeting. There being no further business, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 9:47 A.M. nO - '1} 4-620 - (a Vickie O'Connor, CMC/AAE, Town Clerk BRADFORDPUaLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission August 15, 1995 Commission: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, John Gilfillan, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Brown, Burgess, Gilfillan, A. Hix and Thomas Also Attending: Trustee/Liaison Dekker, Community Development Director Stamey, Senior Planner Joseph, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Commissioner Pohl Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M. 1. MINUTES. Minutes of the July 18, 1995 meeting were approved as presented. 2. SUBDIVISIONS. 2.A. Preliminarv Plat of Mountain Park Subdivision (Storer Ranch). Richard Wille and Jim Wehr/Applicant. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Brown) the Plat be continued to September 19, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 2.B. Amended Plat of Lot 1. Stanlev Meadows Addition. Town of Estes Park/Applicant. It was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) the Plat be continued to September 19, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 2.C. Amended Plat of Lots 7. 8. 25. and a Portion of Lot 24. Block 10. Town of Estes Park (Lewiston Condominiums). Rex Miller/Applicant. It'was moved and seconded (Burgess/Brown) the Plat be continued to September 19, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 2.D. Amended Plat of Lot 2. Tanton subdivision. Dave Tanton/Applicant. Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar noted that this plan was originally submitted to the Planning Commission in 1994. Due to changes necessitated by staff and the time expended, it was decided to present this Final Plat to the Commission for their recommendation to the Town Board. The Applicant desires to divide two lots into four, with all lots meeting the minimum lot size requirement. The Applicant prepared a drawing that meets all Town requirements, and he (the Applicant) has no objection to staff comments. The rezoning request will be considered by the Town Board. Concerning utilities, Lots 2 and 4 are served by UTSD; Lot 1 is served by a septic system and needs to be connected to public sewer--said connection will be accomplished. The Applicant intends to provide separate water and sewer service lines for each of the four lots, and the Applicant is acquiring easements. Subsequent to a meeting with adjacent property owner Alan Kob, Mr. Kochevar amended the plat by adding an easement over the existing waterline. In addition, water service to Tracts 15 and 16 follows the existing line. The Applicant will provide an Improvement Guarantee; a utility drawing will be provided indicating where the existing and new water and sewer lines are installed; and the cluster box location was identified. I.A.FORD.U.LISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission -August 15, 1995 - Page 2 Sr. Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report, clarifying that access for Lot 3 is directly off Riverside Dr. There were no comments from the audience. Commissioner questions/comments were: clarification that Riverside Dr. is an arterial street; concern with the increasing amount of traffic on Riverside Dr. and the number of accesses being proposed for an arterial street; confirmation that existing utilities serving all lots be located in easements shown on the plat; confirmation that the Applicant is in agreement with a common driveway serving Lot 3 and the lot to the west; and confirmation that the site is within the NCWCD. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) the Amended Plat of Lot 2, Tanton Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. All lots be served with public water and sanitary sewer. 2. A shared access and maintenance agreement for Lot 3 be prepared and submitted for Town staff review prior to Town Board action. 3. Final Plat and rezoning request to be considered concurrently by the Town Board on September 26, 1995. 2.E. Final Plat Of Tracts 96A and 968. Placid Lake Subdivision. J. R. and Rachael Preston/Applicant. This is a 14-acre site consisting of two existing parcels, each containing an existing single family dwelling. The subdivision plat is comprised of the following major features: â€¢ Eight lots of approximately equal size (0.2 Ac.) resembling building envelopes. â€¢ Vehicular aecess via Outlot C to the site from the existing western drive with the eastern drive serving as an emergency access. â€¢ All sites have access to the river and lake from their lot via uninterrupted pedestrian access across the common area. â€¢ Two open space outlots of 11.36 acres that will be common area to the lot owners - Placid Lake, walkways,Â· river access, and a picnic area at the southwest corner of the property. The proposed density of 8 single-family lots equates to one lot per 76,230 sq. ft. of total site area. This ratio meets the requirements for this site. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's Representative, noted that the fencing item has been added to the Homeowners Association documents. The intent is to use fencing for dog runs; the existing fence along the north boundary line along the highway is being replaced with a split-rail fence. The proposal includes a 30' setback from the river; and that the Applicant has applied for inclusion in the NCWCD Chas been advised acceptance may take 6 months - 1 yr.); the Homeowners Association documents, as well as utility plans, have been submitted with the plat. The Applicant has no objection to BRADFOROPUSLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 15, 1995 - Page 3 staff comments. Commissioner comments included: there are three fences (west, north and east), however, the fences are not intended to deny wildlife access; confirmation that a note will be added to the plat stating that the second access (northeast) is for emergency access and which will include an appropriate barrier; pursuant to the time delay for acceptance into the NCWCD, a request for an Improvement Guarantee to ensure protection of the public in purchasing a lot without any water service (staff could determine the amount of the improvement guarantee); and confirmation that the hike/bike trail is located within the highway right-of-way. Sr. Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report, noting that there are two open space lots, and confirmation that the Homeowner's Association documents and utility plans have been submitted and are being reviewed; the recorded covenants are to be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits; the Dedication Statement should be amended as there are no streets, future streets or rights-of-way dedicated to the public; and the note concerning one emergency access should be added to the plat. Public comments were heard from Linda Tucker (received confirmation that the lots are approximately 8,700 sq. ft. each, total acreage is 14.3 acres, zoning is E-Estate, and the building envelope areas were reviewed). Staff confirmed that a public path, most likely between Fall River and the highway is being proposed. Due to steepness, the path cannot be placed along the river. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) the Final Plat of Tract 96A and 96B, Placid Lake Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent -upon the items identified under Proj ect Review dated August 9, 1995 be incorporated, including the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. Delete the reference to public streets on the plat. 2. The Homeowners Association documents be submitted with the Final Plat for review regarding the open space and private street maintenance. 3. Submit proof that the application to the NCWCD has been filed, and that an Improvement Guarantee be provided, with staff to determine the dollar amount of the guarantee. 4. A copy of the recorded covenants be provided to the Town prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. The eastern access at the highway be labeled "emergency access" on the plat, with said access to have an appropriate barrier. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that two easements have been added to the plat for the Light and Power and water services lines. 3. ANNEXATIONS. 3.A. Fish Creek Addition (formerly submitted as Waterbury Addition). Joan Waterbury/Applicant. Chairman Sager opened the public hearing. This proposal is for a subdivision BRA[FOROPUSLI;141/GCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 15, 1995 - Page 4 combined with an annexation request. The site consists of two existing unimproved parcels under the same ownership zoned as E-Estate in the County. The applicant is requesting R-S zoning and subdivision into three lots of just under one acre each. Additional land is being dedicated as public right-of- way along Fish Creek Road. Each of the proposed lots is bisected by the Fish Creek drainage, and 100-year floodplain and wetlands exist on each lot. Applicant's Representative Kochevar noted that the area is bound by E-Estate (Town) on the west, and R-S Residential (Town) on the north and south. Access to each lot is available off Fish Creek Road. The Applicant intends only single-family units, and has no objection to staff comments. Concerning access, pursuant to discussion with staff, it appears the best proposal is to combine a driveway for all three lots (access north of Lot 3) to include a common access easement for all three lots--this will be shown on the plat. The public walkway easement could be placed along Fish Creek Road. In addition, the additional wetlands on the southeast corner will also be added to the plat. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that the Applicant ,has obtained a permit Â·to cross the wetlands. The property boundary at Fish Creek Road must be revised, and right-of-way dedicated 'to Larimer County--all to be revised on the plat. Warren Campbell, adjacent property owner, stated he would work with the Applicant on an agreement for access off Country Club Dr. Sr. Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report confirming that the subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision under Chapter 16.12.070, therefore, it can be considered as a Final Plat. Staff recommends the Fish Creek Road right-of-way be dedicated to Larimer County by a separate document, which will ensure the Town will not maintain a county road. Also, the shared driveway access off Fish Creek is very desirable. As there were no comments from the audience, Chairman Sager declared the public hearing closed. Due to design details concerning the common access off Fish Creek not being provided on the plat, it was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) the Fish Creek Addition be continued to September 19, 1995, and it passed unanimously. Staff confirmed that the trail along Fish Creek Road should be identified as a public access easement. Commissioner Brown reiterated his concerns with inclusion into the NCWCD relative to protection of the public. Commissioner Burgess expressed her desire that the Applicant return with designated building envelopes. REPORTS. Director Stamey reported that he administratively approved a building extension/addition for Black Canyon Inn. Chairman Sager acknowledged that the next Planning Commission meeting will remain on the summer schedule, meeting at 9:30 A.M. The regular meeting schedule (1:30 P.M.) will begin in October. Paul Kochevar called attention to the J. R. Preston Final Plat (Placid Lake) whereby the Applicant took a detailed approach, providing substantial information. This approach is three/four times more expensive. Mr. Kochevarls comments were relative to the approaching Comprehensive Plan review/adoption. In addition, Mr. BRADFOROPUILISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 15, 1995 - Page 5 Kochevar suggested the Comprehensive Plan should address when the Commission will require river access. Commissioner Thomas commented on the lack of Fire Dept. comments, particularly relative to the Placid Lake proposal where emergency access was pertinent to the proposal. While he understands the Department is volunteer, it is disturbing that comments are not received when access for the Fire Department is being discussed/planned. There being no further business, Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 10:35 A.M. ~Â· ~ Â»UL / ~0744*j Vickie O'Connor, CMC/AAE, Town Clerk August 14, 1995 RECEIVED Town Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1200 AUG 1 6 1995 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 ADMIN, DEPT, Dear Town Board of Trustees: As property owners in the neighborhood surrounding the newly annexed property known as the MANSKE ADDITION (SE 1/4 SW 1/4, SECTION 31, T5N, R73W, WEST OF INTERSECTION OF BROOK DRIVE AND AVALON DRIVE), we support the Planning Commission's recommendation for zoning this property as R-S Single Family. We ask that you take into consideration their recommendation and vote to designate the MADfiE ADDITION as R-S Single Family at the next Town Board meeting scheduled for Tuesday August 22, 1995. Respectfully ~-10--- gul-f~--df. 2~>12_12- Gjh-UL.Th *6\9Â© (Â»69 l Â·4LtlÂ»J U. #Cit,--- E/Upl -543e (Uit,u, 1. 4-Â£Â£Â£-,J '39 a .0Â»1-LIM .-170 LA L-r-\1- % 44 46-- -O 08 1 31Â»<52 - c.3&1#15/./,H#... 1#j26~.6-/23/733,2.r-./' cfo -1-Â»ft -f GÂ«-11.' Lij 41 I -f 14; 2 -d# c. i h 1 4/ i ,Â·2 0 * t/*JAS. 11Â»Â·~.~ 0 LÂ·Â·t 7 . 61 , A- DOD. 6306' 4,/, 062 76/ 9/,44 03111 4- A-U-~V.~\ -*1(~ 4 LA - rk=12 2 , 04MA< 44)-B. - /KZ. 9~~ UC C )17, 11, 4/.Lu 1 (Fl*Lig H-4 -3-130vuztpi= *Â«f Â« api. 02-0.41Â« 6 l A ' 4 j j :t. 1% A ~ff) ht @1|~3 jft;l':Y, /1,ia *AAC,& C 24 / 993- Wa_/ -11. Â»ULÂ·eÂ·Â·Â£, 9*--~~ ~ 64Â£2- du--0-puu~ 7 4- / f-+ 01 1 Lip ( 0*-8-2--' r.-1-4,4 9) LL 6-1/Â£/ 6 6 2- /36<_2.-UE.A.42-' j-A/L, 0 0-Â»L,-2Â£.*2 241 5.022& 51 ...24 \31 Joi L 0 . â€ž n A A n j U_eiuÂ£0 7 0_~~~ 0 rill.23 f 4 . I , . ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ADDING MANSKE ADDITION TO R-S RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WHEREAS, the annexation of Manske Addition was accomplished on the 8th day of August, 1995; and WHEREAS, following testimony, the Board of Trustees have determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to zone Manske Addition to the Town of Estes Park as R-S Residential. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Manske Addition be zoned as R-S Residential. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and subsequent publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 8th day of August, 1995, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1995. Town Clerk IMMWMBLISMINCCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission July 18, 1995 commission: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, John Gilfillan, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Brown, Burgess, Pohl and Thomas Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Senior Planner Joseph, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Commissioners Gilfillan and A. Hix, Trustee/Liaison Dekker Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 9:30' A.M. 1. MINUTES. was moved and seconded (Pohl/Burgess) the minute t Jun 0, 1995 meeting be amended by striking th 11 g, and it ssed by the following votes: Tho vo ' "Yes" Commissio Burgess, Pohl, Sager and Th s. ose voting "No" none. e "Abstaining" Commissi 'er wn: Item #5A, Amendment to Dev ment Plan 094-2, s chmidt/Applicant: "Representative Koc ar stated t Applicant was advised in April that 's a were not approved by the planning commission comma - ' crt a period (.) the Applicant did meet zoning ordina ' ements and that the Planning Commission would h o juric * tion over these changes. commissioncr roh ucoted the To torncy give an opinion Director Sta recognized Dennis Gordon, Directo f the Allen County, I a Planning Department to the meeting. Chai Sager recited the "rules of conduct" for the benefl Of a hose in attendance. 2. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 2.A. Development Plan #95-8. Tract 19. Beaver Point. Second Addition. A-1 Trash Service. Inc. /Applicant. This development , plan proposes considerable excavation to prepare the site for construction of two buildings (7,200 sq. ft. total), to house equipment, repair vehicles, store vehicles, and conduct management operations for A-1 Trash Service. The balance of the developed site will be used for employee parking and exterior storage. The northerly building (4,000 sq. ft.) which is to be the first building constructed to house vehicle repair and storage, equipment storage, and an office. Site work is to begin this fall. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's Representative, noted that the Applicant is in need of an improved site with additional space. The Elm Road site has been selected and development plan submitted. The impervious coverage exceeds the 40% limit, and this portion will be submitted by Special Review to the Town Board. A colored map detailed the major features which includes two buildings, compacted gravel area, asphalt surface and undisturbed surface. The site is fairly steep for the size of development, and the northwest corner, adjacent to the storage area, will incur a high cut bank. The bank will be stabilized for no erosion; trees will help shield the site, and, with the addition of 40 new shrubs, the Applicant will meet landscaping requirements. Some vehicles will be kept H.OFORO PUAI"ING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission - July 18, 1995 - Page 2 indoors (daily use). Large roll-offs, portable toilets, and dumpsters will be stored outside. The Applicant does not intend to store refuse outside. commissioner questions included: location of outside vehicle storage. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that the Applicant employs approximately 20 people and that is it uncertain how many vehicles will be parked on the compacted gravel areas. In addition, most vehicles will be washed indoors, and the water will be directed into a detention pond. The Applicant has not yet completed design of the entire system with regard to a cleanup method to capture sand and other debris during interior vehicle washing. Mr. Kochevar was unable to clarify how vehicle cleanup measures occur at the present site, as the Applicant was not in attendance at the meeting. Commissioner Brown stated that the site is appropriate for such development; however, the Commission has an obligation to ensure that the treatment of material is being properly managed, which may include EPA regulations. With regard to . parking concerns, staff confirmed that ten or more vehicles activates the paved parking requirements. Twenty-three parking spaces east of the buildings are proposed to be paved. The storage area ' west of the buildings is proposed as a compacted gravel surface. The *Commission may authorize an appropriate alternative surface for seasonal or periodic use, ie. a gravel surface. Mr. Kochevar also confirmed that A-1 Trash is aware of and manages hazardous waste materials on a daily basis; and, if the Commission so desires, a note could be placed on the plan requiring any effluent from washing vehicles to be seized and placed into the sewer system--if the Owners are able to prove why this requirement should not be attached to the plan, they could return to the Commission seeking further consideration. Applicant's representative also confirmed that the business will expand with the growth of the community and that it is increasingly more difficult to park equipment and employee vehicles at the current site. Senior Planner Joseph commented on the 47% impervious coverage whereby approval must be obtained from the Town Board, and that staff recommendations 1 through 3 have been addressed with submittal of the revised plan. Correspondence was received from Dave & Linda Knecht, adjacent property owners, who expressed their opposition to this development as they may be able to view a portion or all of the development from their home, plus concerns with noise, odor, and erosion problems. In a conversation with Mr. and Mrs. Knecht, staff confirmed that the cut bank will intersect with existing gullies and natural swale and cause erosion uphill. This situation could be alleviated by the Applicant stabilizing the cut bank--it is the Applicant's responsibility for such stabilization. Audience comments were heard from Jane Moran, 745 Meadow Circle (can view the development along the left side as her house is very close; requested the 25' setback for storage be extended to a 50' buffer; existing trees be maintained; and concerns with drainage, and noise and odor pollution. Norm Silge, owner of the site, commented on a deed restriction as contained in the contract with the Applicant whereby a restricted area, 120' north along Elm Road and 180' west, be retained as a green area for a term of 20 years. Mr. Silge intended a perpetual restriction for a buffer area of natural rock and trees. Mr. Silge has no objection to a detention pond as long as the trees and rocks remain in tact; a route can be defined for the sewer easement; and he opposes any effluent being directed into the detention pond, it should be collected into the sewer line. Mr. Silge also commented that, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 8~AOFOROPUmLIWINGCOÂ· Planning Commission - July 18, 1995 - Page 3 as indicated on the plan, a portion of the paved parking area would fall into the restricted area. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that the document is a contract to purchase the property and that the Applicant does not have the same understanding of the setback. The contract has been executed; however, closing has not yet taken place. If the restriction affects the parking area, there is sufficient space in which to relocate said parking without a significant change to the plan. Staff added that Mr. Silge still has an opportunity to modify or withdraw the contract--the Planning Commission cannot interpret the sale document between the two private parties. Robert Williams, Lot 15, Park Entrance Estates, reiterated Ms. Moran's statements, adding his concerns on drainage (additional research is required with regard to Sunrise Lane), decreased property values, and the portable toilets should be placed under cover. A letter of opposition from Dave and Linda Knecht was also acknowledged. Noting that the proposal is consistent with zoning, and historic uses, it was moved and seconded (Brown/Sager) Development Plan #95-8 for Tract 19, Beaver Point, Second Addition be approved contingent upon the following, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Brown, Pohl, Sager and,Thomas. Those voting "No" Commissioner Burgess. Those "Abstaining", None. 1. Indicate those areas to remain undisturbed to meet the planting and outdoor storage screening requirements. 2. Identify those areas to be used for outdoor storage. 3. Identify those areas to be paved with asphalt. 4. Add a note to the plan that the washing facility will be installed with properly trapping of the effluent into the sewer main (meeting UTSD standards). L 5. Recommend the Town Board approve the 47.2% impervious coverage. 6. Owner to submit proof that the land is included in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. 7. The crosspan be adjusted to collect curb drainage. 8. The Applicant stabilize the western parking area following construction to ensure upstream erosion not occur. 9. Asphalt be replaced with a 4" thickness at Elm Road to duplicate existing road thickness. 10. The Applicant replace any damaged curbing. 11. Resolution of the parking area in the restricted area (as set forth in the sales contract)Â· Items 1 - 11 to be resolved prior to Town Board approval. Mr. Kochevar will discuss the possibility of the Applicant's willingness to install a corrugated metal enclosureÂ· ...O.0.0 PU...1..,Ne CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission - August 15, 1995 - page 3 3. ANNEXATIONS. 3.A. Fish Creek Addition (formerlv submitted as WaterbuKY I. G Addition). Joan Waterbury/Applicant. Chairman Sager opened the public hearing. This proposal is for a subdivision combined with an annexation request. The site consists of two existing unimproved parcels under the same ownership zoned as E-Estate in the County. The applicant is requesting R-S zoning and subdivision into three lots of just under one acre each. Additional land is being dedicated as public right-of- way along Fish Creek Road. Each of the proposed lots is bisected by the Fish Creek drainage, and 100-year floodplain and wetlands exist on each lot. Applicant's Representative Kochevar noted that the area is bound by E-Estate (Town) on the west, and R-S Residential (Town) on the north and south. Access to each lot is available off Fish Creek Road. The Applicant intends only single-family units, and has no objection to staff comments. Concerning access, . pursuant to discussion with staff, it appears the best proposal is to pombine a driveway for all three lots (access north of Lot 3) to include a common access easement for all three lots-this will be shown on the plat. The public walkway easement could be placed along Fish Creek Road. In addition, the additional wetlands on the southeast corner will also be added to the plat. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that the Applicant has obtained a permit to cross the wetlands. The property boundary at Fish Creek Road must be revised, and right-of-way dedicatedto Larimer County--all to be revised on the plat. Warren Campbell, adjacent property owner, stated he would work with the Applicant on an agreement for access off Country Club Dr. Sr. Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report confirming that the subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision under Chapter 16.12.070, therefore, it can be considered as a Final Plat. Staff recommends the Fish Creek Road right-of-way be dedicated to Larimer County by a separate document, which will ensure the Town will not maintain a county road. Also, the shared driveway access off Fish Creek is very desirable. As there were no comments from the audience, Chairman Sager declared the public hearing closed. Due to design details concerning the common access off Fish Creek not being provided on the plat, it was moved and seconded (Brown/A. Hix) the Fish Creek Addition be continued to September 19, 1995, and it passed unanimously. Staff confirmed that the trail along Fish Creek Road should be identified as a public access easement. Commissioner Brown reiterated his concerns with inclusion into the NCWCD relative to protection of the public. Commissioner Burgess expressed her desire that the Applicant return with designated building envelopes. aRACOFOROPUeLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission - JulY 18, 1995 - Page 7 Due to the number of unresolved issues yet to.~ks.alldil&&Id,0 was moved and seconded (BrEHELillig~nary Plat of Mountain Park Suk Ilmr7mfcontinued to August 15, 1995, and it p a.sa~ly. Commissioners Brown and Thomas note~tllil-~hey will not support the proposal without a we,terly connection. ~ Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates at Cedar_Ridge. Second Filing. Richard & Ann Barlow/Applicant. The Applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 13 lots for single-family development. Due to the number of unresolved issues, this plat was continued from the June 20 meeting. Bill Van Horn, Applicant's Representative, reviewed the staff comments, and Kevin Fry/Van Horn Engineering, confirmed that a CDOT Access Permit has been applied for and the Company received a letter in June. Staff confirmed that construction plans have been submitted and approved and the modification to the roadway has been resolved. There being no public comments, it was moved and seconded (Brown/Thomas) the Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates at Cedar Ridge, Second Filing be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following to be completed prior to Town Board approval, and it passed unanimously: 1. Plat Information. â€¢ Show wetlands. â€¢ Show existing structures and add a note that the structure on Lot 28 will be removed within two years. â€¢ Label easements that diagonally cross Lots 25, 29 and 30; and Lots 28 and 27, and provide dimension. â€¢ Add to Note 1: This affects Lots 22, 23 , 25, 26 and 29. â€¢ Indicate purpose of cul-de-sac on Exception Tract 2 and Lot 19. â€¢ Modify dedication and lienholder statements as set forth in Town Attorney White'S letter of June 5, 1995. 2. Easements. â€¢ Note 4 to read: "An easement for snow fencing is granted for public use within 100 feet... Note 5 to read: "All lots have 10 foot utility easements on all lot lines unless otherwise indicated." â€¢ Add drainage easements to the plat. â€¢ Add a note to the plat that maintenance of the drainage facilities is the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association, or each lot owner if there is not an association. â€¢ Label the perimeter easement 20 feet wide. 3. Access. â€¢ The 30 foot utility and access easement on Lots 20 and 21 should not be vacated unless agreed to by Exception Tract 2. ll IMA'FORD PUILISMING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - July 18, 1995 - Page 4 I.E. 1.-57 Amended Plat of Lot 2. James Subdivision. Tad & Dean Wariner/Applicant. This request is to divide one existing five acre lot into two lots. The lots would utilize a shared access. Representative Van Horn confirmed that the Applicant is aware that this proposal will eliminate the bed and breakfast and maintenance of horses uses previously approved on this site. Director Stamey reviewed the staff report, which included a comment requesting a building envelope be identified to ensure development does not require significant cut and fill and would be in compliance with setback requirements. As there were no comments from the audience, it was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) the Amended Plat of Lot 2, James Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. Plat information. 2. Confirmation of utility service 3. Both lots be connected to UTSD and Town water. 4. Add access maintenance agreement note. 5. The bed and breakfast and horse maintenance uses are eliminated with approval of this amended plat. 6. The building envelope be identified on the plat. 7. Owner to submit proof that the land is included in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. 8. Delete the boundary adjustment statement on the plat. 9. Acquire a CDOT Access Permit. RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-107(1)(g), C.R.S., hereby states its intention to annex the area described herein. The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the Petition filed with the Town requesting annexation of the area described herein is in substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107 (1) (g) , C. R. S. The Board of Trustees further finds and determines that the Petition is signed by persons comprising one hundred (100%) percent of the landowners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning one hundred (100%) percent of the area, excluding public streets, and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality. Such area, if annexed, will be known as "MIGNERY ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. Such area is described as follows: A portion of Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, described as commencing at the most Westerly corner of the tract of land conveyed from the Estes Park Development Company fo E.R. and Rose K. Smith recorded in Book 984 at Page 516, said corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING Thence N 38.55' E a distance of 475.00 feet; Thence N 51Â°05' W a distance of 359.26 feet; Thence S 40.31' W a distance of 475.18 feet; Thence S 51.05' E a distance of 373.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with Section 31-12-108, C.R.S., a public hearing shall be held on October 10, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Municipal Building, located at 170 MacGregor, Estes Park, Colorado, for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk shall give the notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the plat of the Mignery Addition be referred to the Planning Commission to begin the necessary procedures to make the property subject to the zoning ordinances of the Town. DATED THIS day of , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 4 . c TOWN OF ESTES PARK Vid.9 4 22.y.7 Gary F. Klaphake ..9.3 - Â£,2- Town Administrator 2*1'Jr, ~ 5 42-- - A:lep kt em y - 261 *f-2 - 'Ey.ker 1.=*24/1 #4*JINWR?531*6-79&4#thwar : , -04=147*fy:4633 7 4/ f.,; ..2,1."5'h l., ?bl 0% 31 92* A Â» -~ Â·Â·.#~'~y~Â·-Â·5â‚¬7 . Â· ~/ 2 - - 7.0.- 2 'P.Ck 44 - ./11'i I , 2~- . 4. - -ac~o: 046# 22<*BJ~.Piti~ X ~12794 m *fiwt #q. f ' if - -- 0~,LNk\.~.\ 1.\. Â¢ ./ i~.411/4,1~//0 -- j -'P )*2'ti i 5, I -- .-des -A N Â·'UN .3 9 /44,2... --*2242'E f Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Augdkt- 1)6, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor Dannels Board of Trustees FROM: Gary Kl aphake (/. |0~- ' Town Administrator RE: PETITION TO REZONE STORER RANCH ADDITION The neighbors to the Storer Ranch Addition have petitioned the Town to rezone the property from C-0 Commercial to E-Estate. I think you have the following options: 1. Disagree with the petition and take no action. 2. Refer the petition to the Planning Commission for recommendation. I have reviewed the status of the petition with Town Attorney White. Recommendation: That the petition be referred to the Planning Commission. This is not to be confused with agreeing with the proposal but rather that planning concerns be initiated and/or considered by the Planning Commission first. Trhohone f.30-31 586-5.331 Ron S. Harvey Tel. 970-586-8188 1830 North Ridge Lane Estes Park, CO 80517 RECEIVED Gary Klapahke, Administrator Town of Estes Park AUG 1 5 1995 Estes Park, Colorado ADMIN. DEPT. Dear Gary, The attached PETITION FOR REZONING of the northern portion of the STORER RANCH ADDITION to the TOWN OF ESTES PARK which is being presented for consideration at the August 22, 1995 Board of Trustees meeting. Three signatures of people that are currently out of town are missing, and they have been sent a duplicate original which should be back by the 29th. When received we will replace this original with the completed one. The three parties, Helen Lee, Billy Shoemaker and Venus Masakowski have expressed their verbal agreement and are expected to sign the Petition. We request the Board of Trustees to accept this Petition and initiate what ever process that will result in prompt and favorable response in this matter. Sincerely, 04-21 o, Ron S. Harvey 5/'EP-19 PETITION FOR REZONING TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE CONSIDERED FOR REZONING: A tract of land situate in the Southeast 4 of Section 19, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, which considering the East line of said Southeast 4 as bearing North 01Â° 8' East and with all hearings contained herein relative thereto is contained within the boundary lines which begin at a point on the East line of said Southeast 4 which bears South 01Â° 8' West 269.02 feet from the East 4 corner of said Section 19 and run thence South 01Â° 8' West 921.22 feet along said East line; thence North 59Â° 58' West 267.54 feet; thence along the arc of a 3474.80 foot radius curve to the left a distance of 587.26 feet, the long chord of which bears North 64Â° 48' 30* West 586.56 feet; thence North 69Â° 39' West 472.00 feet; thence North 20Â° 21' East 414.56 feet; thence South 89Â° 11' East 1079.09 feet to the point of beginning, containing 16.9175 acres. 2. NAMES OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE: Welch, James D'A /et al 3103 Royal Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 3. PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT c-0 PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT E-ESTATE 4. APPLICANT'S (NEIGHBOR'S) REASON FOR REQUEST: The subject property is the northern portion of the Storer Ranch Addition, a 35 acre tract, improperly annexed to the Town of Estes Park in 1984. The proposed change to E-Estate will returnÂ·this portion of the sub-division to a residential use existing prior to annexation and is compatible with the present E-Estate zoning of Lone Pine Acres on the eastern border and Larimer County RE-1 zoning of the Storer Ranch on the northern and western borders. The proposed change is also consistent with the Estes Park Future Land Use Plan, adopted prior to annexation and the comprehensive master plan currently under consideration. Both of these plans reflect the sentiments of local residents for low density residential growth with open space. The 1984 zoning change from residential to C-0 commercial was done to facilitate a proposed development plan which was contingent upon annexation, zoning and P.U.D. approval being granted by the Town. The property was to have been purchased by HPR Partnership and developed as a Planned Unit Development for a research and development business park. However, the developers never held title to the property and the project was never started. This process was flawed and did not meet the requirements of C.R. S. Title 31, Article 12. Additionally, upon failure of purpose, there was no provision for the property to revert back to it's prior zoning (residential in the northern portion). The resulting and current C-0 zoning would allow a wide variety of undesirable land use, no longer restricted by the failed P.U.D. and is therefore considered inappropriate adjacent to E-Estate zoning. NOTE: The southern 18.0825 acres of the annexed sub-division, a strip approximately 600 foot wide paralleling the Highway 34 right of way, would remain C-O Outlying Commercial which is consistent with the County zoning of the frontage on the remainder of the Storer Ranch and the C-0 portion of Lone Pine Acres. 5. S IGNATURE S~APPLICANT /NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS: ~ 1.3 all-0 31110%9 11010 L Dele DEell . 651 Lone Pine Drive Bhalesâ€ž-et,e.11 Lot 5 Blk 4 c=**,C)_-Ut/ 92-11 9-2 4/6 Linda 3>lack,r 741 Lon, Pine Drive R.H. Tucker Lot 768 Blk 4 GLit, iL* Geor,4 Grueff ~ 45/Â£/ 1631 High Pine Drive Phyllis GrueÂ¢4 Lot 1 Blk 4 Billy Shomaker Lot 4 Blk 4 Vinui R. Mink=â€¢ki Lot 6 Blk 4 Continued on Page 2 PETITION FOR REZONING TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO (Northern Portion of Storer Ranch Addition) page 2 - continued 5. SIGNATURES OF APPLICANT/NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS (continued) : P â€¢AK 60.96..4-4, /Jâ‚¬n)484-~ \4 30 (Cb#PA~) \U. 1660 North Ridge Ln / Genâ€¢vieve lit' 10Â£560*6/ ' 1660 North Ridge Ln |~ #4,4*\A,a/ c Â¢ tt~dl /*osey K Baith- 1661 Olympian Ln Womon, c. worley 1776 North Ridge Ln C L..0 a.(70 7719â‚¬4=.W Â»'~ follmen ~ 1741 North Ridge Ln MaRy 411.00 2r.---\ 1741 North Ridge Ln C 1=8 2 1 AK-4-2 1 1720 High Pine Dr Helen Lee 1659 High Pine Dr. Carol Prince R-4-f. odt=- Ul.+ 4==L Ron/26*tton /0 27 ~7 1860 North Ridge Ln Mar/lyn Dutton / 1860 North Ridge Ln 4..7/Â£/14â€¢<9 Robert Burritt j ' 1825 High Pine Dr pr.,GIPmurritt 1825 High Pinâ€¢ Dr /- i \ ,//521-- *Rd Durrett--- 1720 North Ridge Ln Durhett 1720 No/th Ridge Ln 10A1# 6 J-4-,a.~/ 4 ) - 77 AA i '47+ / 4 Li . NE::7, Uct/y U,=-/WJ. Todd Shanks ~ 1760 High Pine Dr ~ Gony Shanks 1760 High Pine Dr 11, U<#1*YE#*freA 8//1/ 9 5 0 tn, AE>46 *4 Ron 8. Harvey 0â‚¬- 1830 North Ridge Ln CEFal'k. Harvey 1830 North Ridge Ln 1 6. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS WHOSE PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Welch, James D'A /et al 3103 Royal Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 George & Phyllis Grueff PO Box 3794 Estes Park, CO 80517 R. H. & Linda Tucker PO Box 3495 Estes Park, CO 80517 R.H. & Linda Tucker 10410 Sunflower San Antonio, TX 78213 Billy Shoemaker PO Box 966 Marshall, TX 75671 Dale & Shaleen Duell 651 Lone Pine Dr. Estes Park, CO 80517 Venus R. Masakowski 8526 Oak St. New Orleans, LA 70118 Richard N. Statham 77 County Rd. 82E Allenspark, CO 80510 Lester Schmidt 1633 Raven Ave. Estes Park, CO 80517 OFFICIAL USE ONLY N /1\ U.w- DATE REQUEST RECEIVED 0-15-93 AMOUNT OF FEE $50.00 DATE PAID /0<A REQUEST TO BE CONSIDERED AT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF PUBLIC HEARING OF REQUEST AT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF PUBLIC HEARING OF REQUEST AT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING HELD Ron S. Harvey, Tel.586-8188 10 11 12 13 AREA MAF STORER RANIN ADDIT/011 -420 -RM/w 043 ESTES PARK A ; L QUO SCI //3 FEVILSGULCH--1~--~- GEM LAKE IRA'L PARKIC AREA .Â·LEN HAVEN 5 17 19 I I 17 U 14 HARRISON - 71 22 23 -~ 1. 20 3 - r- PROPOSED SITE I - ]6 43 â€ž .3 e / KE lal E 4,â€¢- c.0 < 9 8 4 25/9/-00-019 To 2-ESTATE â€¢7 27 PARUC- ~~25/94- 00-023 ~ .3 48 5TORER RANCH 14.4 2- ae. 41 78 RE-1 eouNT, E 40 1, 49 LS M 4/ 5 1 29 jo Z L.1, ~~~ ~ VETERINARIAN ~ i ~ Jo STAHL EY HEIGHTS 38 i 30 37 I 3 ~ 3\ RE-1 t.11-1-=123., 4 1 *IN , 1 M 2 COM -fÂ· ~-'Â·'Â·Â·'-:Â· :~Â·2-:Â·~Â·;J U.-- iit.fe 27 . if 4 36 52 32 35 53 Lotel ...2 :.....:-0.-:'....:Â·: -TFf , , .7-4,i,41* f.i' * 1 - - 1. i + 4 33 34 STogE# RANCH O 1 Â·F.0.0~Â·OfÂ© ~ ~~ ~ , .@Aff'kio ' e L._____ ~' COMMeTO,AL ACCOMODATOUS - ~ COUNTY , SreAk~*4*'ch':Â·.191 + '-' 1 J AD DITI ON Â«el..,Ill 4 Ill :*1, 2-0 b*Â·, 2-5 AN - aâ€¢- 011 ///~WIA * 5.+0. - -, ..2Â»4 C , u. 7012--//A 5 6 11 1.# r .,.ty;$Â¢A. 1 -7 .A :.. 0-Ate ' %9.44 " ~4~~4~~~A 50$ 19 10 9 04,~53- . : pli.*310 g.*Tr 2-11 4 0441/.7/ 16 P 11 i, UK VIEW TRACTS â‚¬+ 17 0*/ , 13.14.15 24'.M.P. 4 a 24 23 <044â€¢. --b EXCLUDED . j.:./Pr. - A 1 - . â€¢., c 9 ' - 212-1 A i. 25 45 - ., 1 .0 . 6: i BOAT 621 r--Â·-~~~~31 RE~AL \ 1 - ~- SAINT PRA/N L / \.U. C :314. .4 Â·3.:. A AVENUE 12 1 ; AR Â¥D ESTES .,0 7 LAKE , '~-1 ..~'-~ - P.:. 0 NORTH SAINT VRAIN AVENUE TO LYONS V ~ 77 /NIIM, 1.131 rr Â¥==u 1 ' 26 1 \22 INK,flo. 1 9 ,/ TTLE PROSPAT M NT IN ADDITION > i6-\ \ ~~ 'M1GHLA~O.~~ME - 4,92Ni-NIN . - . A .1 9Â·/i)667*0(.' kN r-- -/-7 / 1*vtr,N'~r<'pâ€¢7 / I y .. 6 /Â·â€¢ul i ' t . FISH CREEK .. STANLEY PARK RODEO GROUNDS \ ~ STANLEY PARK ~ 1 1 ~SW-NG Poo~ E \ STANLEY PARK 1 =3 1 JÂ« 111; L 259 PArnE p 67 fou 9. HARNE7 HAH)_./- ~1 ' ~ ~ VENNER :34Â»1 4 1 . 957â‚¬5 PA" 00 kiLL Â·72,1, . 1%30 AJoiTHIZ, DFF LF : 5 4 4 ,-TIFINiZE!~21\ 1 10 ~ SUB. 2 1 + 1--6 i tti,-21 \~Ll' 3 4 3 6 7 2.26 .U 0 28 11 YÂ» 970 -94 -Wa 7 __1--4 2 kfil "2 31 _L'~ 8 0. 28 <<.0- j/HYDE 9-0 -99Â£,'_E~ FOR*Â©My;~~TFF 32 BONNIE 1 1 -IMAE: A R. 72W zOn. I >IN.d ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THE SAME PERTAINING TO BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1994 EDITION WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1995, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park held a Public Hearing on the adoption of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Building Code; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was published as provided in Section 31-16-203, C D r. .... D. ; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of the Uniform Building Code, 1994 edition, by reference, copies of said Code and all secondary codes were presented to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Chapter 14.12 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, shall be amended to read as follows: 14.12.010 Uniform Building Code, 1994--Adopted. The Uniform Building Code, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, 1994 edition, the Uniform Building Code Appendix, 1994 edition, issued by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 South Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601, except the sections or parts of sections thereof which are amended by this chapter, referred to in this title as the "Uniform Building Code" is enacted, adopted by this reference, and incorporated in this chapter as if set out at length. 14.12.020 Exceptions to Appendix. The Uniform Building Code Appendix, 1994 edition, is amended by the deletion of Chapter 3, Division 3, and Chapters 13, 30, and 34. 14.12.030 Grading Permits. Section 3306 of Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code Appendix, 1994 edition, shall be amended by the addition of Section 3306.3 to read as follows: No grading or excavation for projects which require development or concept plan approval under the provisions of Section 17.36.040 of the Municipal Code shall be done without a grading permit. A grading permit may be issued following final approval of a development or concept plan if the applicant desires to grade or excavate a project prior to the issuance of a building permit. -1- 14.12.040 Section 109.1 amended--Use or occupancy. Section 109.1 of the Uniform Building Code is amended to read as follows: No building or structure of group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R or S occupancy, shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy therefore as provided herein. 14.12.050 Violation. A. It is unlawful for any person to violate any of the provisions stated or adopted in the Uniform Building Code. B. Every person convicted of a violation of any provision stated or adopted in the Uniform Building Code shall be punished as set forth in Section 1.20.020 of this code. C. The Town shall have the option of instituting an appropriate action in any court having jurisdiction to prevent, enjoin, abate or remove a violation of any portion of the Uniform Building Code and to prevent the occupancy of any building and structure or to prevent any illegal act or use in or on such premises as the result of any violation of the provision of the Uniform Building Code. 14.12.060 Damages. Neither the Town's Building Official, Town Engineer, nor any other employee or agent of the Town of Estes Park, nor any volunteer acting on behalf of the Town of Estes Park shall be liable in damages for any act and/or omission by said person pursuant to the duties and the enforcement of the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. 14.08.040 Certificate of Occupancy--Payment of Business Licenses. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy or Final Inspection, pursuant to the provisions of this Title 14, the owner or general contractor shall provide the Town with an affidavit listing all persons or entities which have provided labor and/or materials to be used in the construction, repair, and/or remodeling which is performed pursuant to a building permit issued by the Town. No Certificate of Occupancy or Final Inspection shall be issued and no building or structure shall be occupied until such time as all persons and/or entities that are set forth on the affidavit who are required to have a business license pursuant to the applicable provisions of Chapter 5.10 of the Municipal Code have obtained said license. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and subsequent publication. -2- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THE SAME PERTAINING TO BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1994 EDITION WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1995, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park held a Public Hearing on the adoption of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Mechanical Code; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was published as provided in Section 31-16-203, C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1994 edition, by reference, copies of said Code were presented to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE â€ž TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: . Section 1. That Section 14. 16. 010 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, shall be amended to read as follows: 14.16.010 Uniform Mechanical Code. 1994--Adopted. The .. Uniform Mechanical Code, 1994 edition, issued by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 South Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601, is enacted and adopted by this reference, and incorporated in this chapter as if set out at length. Section 2. Section 14.16.015 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado shall be amended to read as follows: 14.16.015 Fees. The fee schedule in Table 1-A of the Uniform Mechanical Code shall be deleted and replaced by Table 1-A of the Uniform Building Code. Section 3. That Section 14. 16. 030 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado shall be amended to read as follows: 14.16.030 Damages. Neither the Town's Building Official, Town Engineer, nor any other employee or agent of the Town of Estes Park, nor any volunteer acting on behalf of the Town of Estes Park shall be liable in damages for any act and/or omission by said person pursuant to the duties and the enforcement of the provisions of the Uniform Mechanical Code. -1- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THE SAME PERTAINING TO BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1994 EDITION WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1995, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park held a Public Hearing on the adoption of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was published as provided in Section 31-16-203, C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, by reference, copies of said Code were presented to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 14. 24. 010 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, shall be amended to read as follows: 14.24.010 Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994--Adopted. The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 edition, issued by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 20001 Walnut Drive South, Walnut, California 91789-2825, is enacted and adopted by this reference, and incorporated in this chapter as if set out at length. Section 2. Section 14.48.040 is hereby added to read as follows: 14.24.040 Fees. The fee schedule in Section 20.7 of the Uniform Plumbing Code shall be deleted and replaced by Table 3-A of the Uniform Building Code. Section 3. That Section 14. 24. 050 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado shall be amended to read as follows: 14.24.050 Permit--Not required for minor repairs. No permit will be required for minor repair work. "Minor repair work" means the repair of leaks in pipes, drains and faucets, opening up of waste and supply pipes, traps or drains, or replacing broken fixtures or frozen pipes inside the walls of buildings. Where wastes, vents or pipes are changed, a permit must be taken out. -1- Section 4. That Section 14. 24. 090 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado shall be amended to read as follows: 14.24.090 Damages. Neither the Town's Building Official, Town Engineer, nor any other employee or agent of the Town of Estes Park, nor any volunteer acting on behalf of the Town of Estes Park shall be liable in damages for any act and/or omission by said person pursuant to the duties and the enforcement of the provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and subsequent publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1995, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1995. -2- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THE SAME PERTAINING TO THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, 1994 EDITION WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1995, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park held a Public Hearing on the adoption of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings; and WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was published as provided in Section 31-16-203, C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Danger6us Buildings, 1994 edition, by reference, copies of said Code were presented to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 14. 48. 010 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, shall be amended to read as follows: 14.48.010 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. 1994--Adopted. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1994 edition, issued by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 South Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601, is amended and adopted by this reference as a primary code, and incorporated in this chapter as if set out at length. Section 2. Section 14.48.040 is hereby added to read as follows: 14.48.040 Damages. Neither the Town's Building Official, Town Engineer, nor any other employee or agent of the Town of Estes Park, nor any volunteer acting on behalf of the Town of Estes Park shall be liable in damages for any act and/or omission by said person pursuant to the duties and the enforcement of the provisions of the Uniform Building Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and subsequent publication. -1- DR 8439 (12/91) Colorado Department of Revenue APPLICATION FOR A Liquor Enforcement Division 1375 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80261 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (303) 866-3741 Â· APPLICATION MUST FIRST BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE EVENT. LIQUOR PERMIT ACCT. NO. Â· PREMISES MUST BE POSTED AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS BEFORE A HEARING CAN BE HELD. Â· APPROVED APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE LIQUOR EN- DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FORCEMENT DIVISION AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO THE EVENT. â€¢ Print or typewrite in BLACK INK. LIABI'.ITY INFORMATION â€¢ Attach diagram (81/2 x 11- maximum) showing where liquorwill be served and COUNTY Crrf INDUSTRY TYPE LIABILITY DATE consumed. Â· Attach copy of Certificate of Good Corporate Standing (non-profit) (issued by Secretary of State within last two years). STATE FEE PAID Â· If Political Candidate, attach copies of reports and statements that were filed FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE MALT, VINOUS & SPIRITUOUS with the Secretary of State. (3.2 BEER ONLY) 45 - 09 LIQUOR 41 - 09 Â· Attach copy of deed, lease, or written permission of owner for use of the premises. Â· Applicant must have Colorado Sales Tax Account (not Tax Exempt Number). (9) $ (9) $ â€¢ Applicant organization cannot obtain more than 10 Special Event Permits in one calendar year. IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT, YOU MUST BE NON-PROFIT AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (See back for details.) CHECK ONE. G SOCIAL E CHARTERED BRANCH, LODGE or CHAPTER OF A NATIONALORGANIZATION OR SOCIETY ~ FRATERNAL Â£ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION C] PATRIOTIC E PHILANTHROPIC INSTITUTION E POLITICAL C] CHECK HERE IF APPLICANT IS A POUTICAL CANDIDATE E ATHLETIC U CHECK HERE IF APPLICANT IS A MUNICIPALITY OWNING ARTS FACILITIES TYPE OF SPECIAL EVENT APPUCANT IS APPLYING FOR: Your Local Licensing Authority (city or [3 FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE (3.2 Beer) (State Permit Fee - $10.00 per day) county) will indicate the amount Of their ~ MALL VINOUS AND SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR (State Permit Fee - $25.00 per day) permit fee. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE: Sales Tax # Estes Valley Sunrise Rotary Club, Inc. 27-25818 2. MAILING ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE: 42~DD##SSELp*!f&I#i"KVPECIAL EVENT: P.O. Box 4261 #ond *ArK, Downtown 9stes Park CITY OR TOWN STATE ZIP CITY OR TOWN STATE ZIP Estes Park co 80517 Estes Park co 80517 NAME DATE OF BIRTH HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, State, Zip) PHONE NUMBER 4. PRESJSEC'Y OF ORG. or POLITICAL CANDIDATE: Kathy Lissner, Pres. 1117 Rambling Dr. (970)586-9447 5. EVENT MANAGER: Es[es Park, CO 80517 John Mutchler (970)586-5558 6. HAS APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE BEEN 7. IS PREMISES NOW LICENSED UNDER STATE LIQUOR OR BEER CODE? ISSUED A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT THIS CALENDAR YEAR? 52 NO El YES HOW MANY DAYS? ~ NO ~ YES TO WHOM? LIST BELOW THE EXACT DATE(S) FOR WHICH APPLICATION IS BEING MADE FOR PERMIT Date: 9.23-95 Date: 9 -1 4- 93- Date: Date: Date: Hours: From: /02 00 A.m. Hours: From: /2.Â·00 kr-rm. Hours: From: .m. Hours: From: ,m. Hours: From: Tol 8, M P.m. To: 8.Â· 00 P .m To: .m. To: .m. To: OATH OF APPLICANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all jaf67*tion therein is true, cormct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA~RE: / / TITLE: DATE: (~f>L Â£;,A /0 t, L.w< - EN-<_rJr M Alu 46< t/ 9 AA 7 R~PORT ANA*~ROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satisfactory, and we do report that such permit, if granted, will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 48, C.R.S., as amended. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: (Over) EE BOND PARK /Â»..... AREAS AVAILABLE M$; 2-: 1 . 3-104*..1 ,--e: iNA.> --: I 4. <02â‚¬ â€ž fit:..>:,-<;:y ~:70+ ' 4. 7-: 4.-2 . 0 Â·: Â·'Id FOR TENT PLACEMENT .Â»43 :>S-?**grf 2 " tt:A. U V,0...33 --~i eÂ»- S tÂ¥29?2Â·. 1,6.-1% 5...1... *%443*34*49,-,149,1RatNIA)SPR:*EÂ»27*-~3*U<:3Â·Â¥(440; 1. lÂ¢ 1 I Â¥4*932%41:%*44***~Â¢%3924*iply, ~41#4'u--Â· 4-! 1/4 1,#i~'31:F-i':i . f2i*24712::034996%<ft: 0412 4--~9Â»-4.1'~~~~Z.~4~iÂ«*91:%32-llt:G: - - --. i':ff-.3-444%Â·,0 13-t...3.. :2 7-.1..~ %. - '~ 5- ---- -~ - - ~99%%90â‚¬t . f -p) i"t, 4-2-6.-i--:fal)wÂ®@k3f95- - 1,?rbhr;,1,4 6'i- .Â·-~'18~Hiffi:-*41.4iv, -% Â»*49442Â«Â«*343Â·1 T/47,144,;~ 4.244&....1.wANT 1 b 1 910 L lio ON TREES ta ~.~~ J,Ni***fÂ¢I?P#?>?~Â©E CTRIC OUTLETS P.b %4:.:Â©07131-4 NA , -3 - %1:- -ixitz:-:' S:!-.,1-1~ 1-~,;6 8lifif,-t-Â·. ..~7'42 /4:' ': Â£:~.,;-17 I.-')-,4â‚¬- Â· â€¢â€¢ -XV~ 4 â‚¬ j: 3-K.:: s:~rÂ· ..: ri@Â·.Â·~ Em:-2 5.643$ -Â£ .i.Ij; U~I~}jl'll'%; g'444%1:. i . <2 Z#i : 5- r rec<, s=Glu,Ce A,zi:A C BEEe 92â€¢11/ ABMT*. CSâ‚¬EW-gmuLWA\ n - ': -f' .. 1 10 0 .;6 *,4-,-1~2,;f< ~,~~,&&14','~,~â€žI , 1Â·â€¢â€¢LLÂ» .re*Y#&406<'mâ€¢ v. ..â€¢tz :-=r 4-vi.YÂ·VAâ€¢/â€¢:el 1 -4 -,tr**901*+54 ... I . , : I~ . , '4.#",1-4 ,;t'.111*8;4 JlyÂ·'1~,i: 'â€ž, > Itt 9,--3 -014401 -, A , - 41/'Â·3,- h.i, p .- 4",F# ~'I''RY,-;iii 1/YpkxÂ· . M-'ilft-f , A. ' - 1W "~ f;3 j â€¢ -VI, PAÂ·~/ 4--Â· zâ€¢ /Â·-kiMANO<044% Â·A Â·Al .. . I u *t.: -2 ----- td>2---'.:tki~ NA :I Â·-X. .4/1 1. I . - 1- ' .5 ' +4 4 4.. .... ud. 9.4;ht 62,09.-0.-- ... 4 1 . I $ 3>5#>y . Â·Â·\ Â· -- uu#4 44-:,29441 . r . ,'~ ~~'-I!"brÂ·;<'Li#,4 :?4 P,4 'f,1-:11!~~4%111,1-11;14.. t.1 ~ Â¢Ak:,d.i!- .. 27,4 .4 1. , , 5- fr " t,i:tij-,i Lâ€ž~j;.1,1f~%1#:0Â·~,% i 1 1 2 ... 2 , 31;3120Â£ts:t>ttlÂ·i{>39: . - 4. '.' Â·-9,1-1,!4:4'f.,4,2,21,~,7,#lj â€ž-i'it, i= 7-: 0,-Â«Â»tr.M-- (00-21. \ f ~--~ - -Â·-'-f~ft-f<i,1--:)-trf?;4~20-i~,- --, ~, 1... / 1 / // 19 '1 1/ / ' ::--f-t, t:' ~'; '''i'' i:',~-Â·rall:j,inti:lk,;'*' ,9. . eÂ· 1 / ,-"g:'Â£,f/A-:-9~->: ~>. \\ Z V.- 4-24**Â¥"ai 0// \\ by#-> %9.: , .......:.4 ....::1 1 -2.:: 22 , I 21/4 U 6,5 2---< -Â·â€¢:5 ~Â·...tjys' t~*-:>1:?Ctt '0~ ., .9 I 25:x341 * 1 :rÂ·.' -:.- 31 419#/Rfzffi'Â¢ 1 : 1 J 7 -. ::::it ..2 5.-22.W: iii IÂ·i Eiio \.....*, â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢Iâ€¢â€¢4 Oo ' . 1 04'Air, :':...1 - 1 . 1-5 ~-2 . Cy<:f-.9 ,.:. .NG :: ,-:~ .Â· ~~ *tb 1 : .....I; Ai :ft:)242 : f...El .g f.Â«r .6â‚¬27:2 .:l-: MacGREGORiJAVE-6 - : .:. 9 -=.3 -:-0.::f i.?24-4- :v.-:---4--24-291 9-:ik92.2.41 f-{ 6- - i: - : E-.-4. -7-:~ I~---..n '1. r ~i~ 0-3 .> .4- ~Â·:4J.3fs*.e~rth. -44.-- - ---r:- In*m .4,=40'1%.*~I#EUirt,- i n : ..=Â£: 3.42.-2$;fi40â‚¬31{2:a,t., 1 . -6, ~ /lit ---1~ . -3-~~ 0~.. I j..2 .47 tf . C f..\, 4~, \ 9- \ .b E?~ t,~''hi 421= r'f'-,-~*~94.9:;,4997 I ./ I / 1 1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 1 11 1 , ~* f: ', interoffi MEMORANDUM to: Mayor Bernie Dannels CC: Estes Park Town Board of Trustees from: Judy Hoxsey ~J re: Library Board Vacancy date: August 15, 1995 Steven J. Little has resigned his position on the Library Board of Trustees, effective as of the Board meeting last night, as he has found it necessary to return to Massachusetts for the next few years. A copy of his letter is attached. Mr. Little's term will expire at the end of 1995. The Library Board wishes to recommend the re-appointment of Ms. Barbara Ludwig to fill the remainder of Mr. Little's term. As you may remember, Ms. Ludwig served on the Library Board of Trustees for several years until she resigned in December 1993 to work as an exchange teacher in Australia during the 1994 school year. The Library Board feels it is important to have a full board during the crucial months of September through December since this is the time the budget for 1996 is prepared and approved. from the desk of... Thank you for approving this Judy Hoxsey recommendation as soon as possible. Director Estes Valley Public Library District 335 E. Elkhom Ave. Estes Park, CO 80517 303586-8116 Fax: 303 586-0189 Box 37 Glen Haven, CO 80532 August 6, 1995 Mr. Allan Wasson, President Estes Park Public Library Board 335 E. Elkhorn Ave Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Al, This letter is notice of my resignation as a trustee from the Estes Park Public Library Board of Trustees as of the meeting of August 14, 1995. I must return (temporarily) to Massachusetts and can no longer serve on the board. I have enjoyed my service on the board and have learned much about the operation of libraries as well as the operation of boards of trustees. I will miss the opportunity to meet monthly with a good group of people who I have come to like. I hope to return to the Estes Park area for good in a few years, and I look forward to my continued association with the Estes Park Library at that time. Sincerely, AL 0 Stephen J.VLittle 1