Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Town Board 1995-08-08
- BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, August 8, 1995 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated July 25, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, August 3, 1995. 4. Sunrise Rotary Club - Autumn Gold Event, September 23 and 24, 1995, Bond Park - Motion Authorizing Town Clerk to Post the Premises. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District: A. ordinance #12-95 Authorizing Improvements - Approval. B. Authorize the Town Clerk to Begin the Process of Placing the Bond Issue on the November 7, 1995 Ballot. C. Resolution - Election. 2. Planning Commission: A. Manske Addition Annexation: 1. Resolution - Finding the Area Eligible for Annexation. 2. Ordinance - Annexation of Property. 3. Public Hearing. Zoning Ordinance, R-S Single- Family Zoning. B. Public Hearing. Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates, Second Filing, Richard & Ann Barlow/Applicant. C. Public Hearing. Amended Plat of Lot 2, James Subdivision, Tad & Dean Wariner/Applicant. 3. Public Works Department: A. Slurry Seal Project (Portion of 1995 Street Improvement Program Budget) - Request Approval to Expend $50,000. 4. Marys Lake Lodge Grant Application - Authorization to Sponsor Colorado Historical Society Grant for Roof Rehabilitation - 1 Does Not Require Any Expenditure of Town Funds. , 5. Resignation of Frank Hix from the Museum Advisory Board, effective August 22, 1995. 6. Town Administrator's Report: A. B. Adjourn as the Board of Trustees Convene as Estes Park Housing Authority 1. Lone Tree Apartments Project, 1310 Manford Ave.: A. Approval of Architect. B. Approval of Loan Negotiations. 2 , Town of Estes Park, Larimer county, colorado, . Jul* 25.....,19.94 Minutee of a . Regular· · · meeting of the Board of Trusteei of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . ?5th . day of .... .July. .., A.D., 19. ?5. at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor .......... Robert L. Dekker, Pregent: Mayor H. B. Dannels Trustees: Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, Stephen W. Gillette, William J. Marshall Also Present: Gary F. K.19phake, Town Administrator Gregory A 2 White, Town Attorney Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Absent: Michael E. Miller, Trustee J. Donald Pauley, Trustee Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. There was no public comment. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated July 11, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, July 13, 1995. B. Planning Commission, July 18, 1995 (acknowledgement only). 4. Amended Plat of Lots 7, 8, 25, and a Portion of Lot 24, Block 10, Town of Estes Park, Rex Miller/Applicant - Refer back to Planning Commission. 5. Special Review of Development Plan #95-8, A-1 Trash Service Facility, Tract 10, Beaver Point, Second Addition - Continue to August 22, 1995. 6. Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates, Second Filing - Continue to August 8, 1995. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Gillette) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Presentation of Community Survey Conducted June 22-28. 1995. Administrator Klaphake reported that the 1995 Community Survey was conducted by Talmey Drake Research & Strategy, Inc. The Town's initial survey was conducted in 1988, followed by 1993 and the third in 1995. Paul Harstad, Vice President/Talmey Drake and J. W. Postal presented the survey. The results were based on 404 random telephone interviews with residents of the Estes Valley area who were 18 years old or older. Interviews were conducted from June 22 to June 28, 1995. Quotas were 03 - i . Board of Trustees - July 25, 1995 - Page 2 established to obtain proportional representation for men and women, and to allocate half the interviews within the Town limits and half outside Town limits, yet within the Valley. i The random sample of 404 has a 95% confidence interval of plus or minus 4.7%. Mr. Harstad reviewed several graphs, and according to the t survey, the most important problems facing the Estes Park , were: Excessive growth ................... 63% Housing 37% Schools/Education .................. 30% I Traffic/Parking/Congestion ......... 29% Economic Problems .................. 16% Environmental Protection ........... 15% Miscellaneous items: (1) a total of 64% of the respondents I stated that the Town should set a limit on the number of I residential building permits/year; (2) 78% agree that EPURA should continue to build local projects such as riverwalks, public parking, parks and open space areas; (3) 66% believe Estes Park tourism should remain at about the same level in I the next few years; (4) 50% agree that local taxes are too ~ high and the Trustees must cut the local tax burden; (5) services that are "falling short" (selected categories) 87% seasonal housing, parking 75%, public transportation 61%, open I space 49%, education' 23%. The 2% indicated for crime is a record low.; (6) 52% agree that the Town should financially support watchable wildlife tours/wildlife interpretive center, 75% agree that the Town should adopt more strict regulations j to protect wildlife habitat and migration areas from new development, and 79% agree that the Town should ban helicopter t and airplane sightseeing flights over RMNP. In general, the 1995 survey collected similar results as compared to previous surveys, with some slippage in the question of whether Estes Park was headed in the right direction: in 1988, 72% agreed that Estes Park was headed in the right direction. In 1995, the percentage was 62%. Mr. Harstad noted that although 62% is a good score, the trend should not be ignored. Questions on the Library District (expanding Library computer services, purchase additional books, hire additional staff), Recreation District (whether current facilities/activities meet the community's needs), and School District (whether public school facilities are overcrowded, underutilized, or about the right capacity) were also included Mayor Dannels expressed the Board's appreciation to Mr. Harstad for his presentation, atknowledged receipt of the report, and Administrator Klaphate voiced his appreciation to i Ass't. Administrator Widmer for'his efforts on this project. 3.A. Manske Addition Annexation. Staff advised that a valid petition opposing the zoning change for this property had been submitted, and such action requires that five Trustees be present. Four members were present, and Trustee Pauley notified the Town late Tuesday afternoon that he would be unable to attend the meeting. Trustee Pauley was reached and ~ he advised that he could be present by 9:15 P.M. Thus, Mayor Dannels noted that this item would be considered at approximately 9:15 P.M. Applicant's Representative Van Horn stated that the Applicant is requesting the item be continued as he (Mr. Van Horn) was advised by staff at 5:00 P.M. that the requisite number of Trustees would not be present. Board of Trustees - July 25, 1995 - Page 3 Concern was expressed with continuing the hearing for the residents who were in attendance. Town Attorney White clarified the status of the public hearing relative to a quorum of five members, and it was moved and seconded (Dekker/Gillette) the Manske Addition Annexation be continued to August 8, 1995, and it passed unanimously. Trustee Doylen urged affected residents who may be unable to attend the August 8 public hearing to forward correspondence to the Town. Trustee Pauley joined the meeting at 8:40 P.M. 2. Archery Hunting Policy 1995/96 - Fish Hatchery/Fall River Hydro Plant Property. Pursuant to the Light and Power Committee's recommendation, it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Dekker) the Archery Hunting Policy for the Fish Hatchery/Fall River Hydro Plant Property be extended to 1995/96, and it passed unanimously. 3.B. Appeal of Planning Commission Decision to Deny the Amendment to Development Plan #94-2. Lot 2A. Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2. Block 4. Lone Pine Acres. First Addition. Lester Schmidt/Applicant (continued from July 11. 1995). Community Development Director Stamey briefed the Trustees on the request to amend Development Plan #94-2 - the original plan included a fence along the east side of the storage area and a landscaped area on the east side of the building. Instead, a paved driveway and gate have been constructed to access the storage area on the·east side of the building, resulting in increased impervious coverage. Asked when the deviation to the plan occurred, staff responded that the change occurred during construction in April. The Town was notified of the change by a neighbor; staff then notified the Applicant that a revised development plan must be submitted. Paul Kochevar/Applicant's Representative, stated that the requested appeal to the Planning Commission did include the gate on the east side, and the access way (to the east) to the gate. Mr. Kochevar presented copies of staff comments to the Planning Commission, minutes of the 6/20/95 and 3/15/94 Planning Commission meetings, plus a section of the Municipal Code. When the Applicant asked Mr. Kochevar if the relocation of the gate and driveway were in compliance with the Code, Mr. Kochevar advised that yes, these items were in compliance; however, he would confirm his response with the Town. Director Stamey advised that a revised development plan must be submitted. Such was accomplished in May. In the interim, a paving contractor was in Estes Park, and, based upon economics, not that the Planning Commission has no jurisdiction on this issue, the Applicant elected to have the driveway paved. In Mr. Kochevar's opinion, the Applicant met all Code requirements. John Phipps, Attorney, referred to Section 17.36.010 5. noting that the Planning Commission cannot deny the revision based upon the seven criteria as contained in said section--the Applicant has met all requirements, and the Plan has been approved. Changes were made concerning surfacing and the gate; however, the Applicant did not act intentionally, he should not be penalized as he is in conformance with the specific ordinance. Mr. Phipps requested the Trustees consider only the two items referred to: surfacing and the gate. Mr. Kochevar added that the gate does remove function as a fence, and the Applicant will landscape with natural materials to make the area as attractive as possible; and confirmed that there is a total of 1,290 sq. ft. of asphalt which results in 76.7% impervious coverage. Director Stamey explained that at the eastern property line, the 6' fence has been changed to a gate that opens, and that the Planning Commission considered neighborhood concerns as to Board of Trustees - July 25, 1995 - Page 4 how the new access drive relates to the neighboring E-Estate zoning relative to adequate screening and landscaping. Ralph.Nicholas, 1660 North Ridge, briefed the Trustees on his opposition to the proposal submitted in 1994 based upon ~ traffic pattern/Raven Ave., extensive excavation, and ~ inadequate screening, stating that the Planning Commission and Town Board must be strong if they expect a strong department in the future. Ron Harvey, Lone Pine Acres, commented on inadequate screening relative to the gate and finished grade, inadequate landscaping on the north end (the trees do not I measure 2%" diameter as required), parking violations on Raven I Ave. and lack of enforcement by the Town, and he urged the i Trustees to deny the revision and require the Applicant to comply with the original plan. Mr. Kochevar responded that the original plan required a 6' site impervious fence and that the gate is 6' high. The fence to the north was installed at the owner's own decision and it meets requirements; other items addresses mentioned above are enforcement issues. Referring to the 3/15/94 Planning Commission minutes, Mr. Kochevar confirmed that the Town does not have zoning regulations that address aesthetics. Mr. Phipps stated that an impasse has been reached which calls for compromise. Discussion followed concerning drainage, and whether landscaping with 2%" diameter trees would provide sufficient screening. Carol Prince, commented that when the Applicant installed the asphalt where the business area was intended, neighborhood privacy and separation from business was compromised. Attorney White noted that the ordinance provides for development plan review, and certain conditions may be attached. The Planning Commission did attach conditions and these conditions were not met. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Pauley/Doylen) the Appeal of the Planning Commission decision to deny the amendment of Development Plan #94-2 for Lot 2A, Amended Plat of Lots and 2, Block 4, Lone Pine Acres, First Addition be denied, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Marshall and Pauley. Those voting "No" Trustee Gillette. C. Amended Plat Of Lot 2. James Subdivision. Tad & Dean Wariner/Applicant. At the Applicant's request, it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) this Amended Plat be continued to August 8, 1995, and it passed unanimously. D. Amended Plat of Lots 8 and 9. Arapaho Meadows. Phase I. Mary Ann Kundtz/Applicant. Applicant's Representative Bill Van Horn reported that this request is to adjust the interior lot line between Lots 8 and 9, and that all Planning Commission conditions have been met. There being no further testimony, it was moved and seconded (Dekker/Marshall) the Amended Plat of Lots 8 and 9, Arapaho Meadows, Phase I be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. Ordinance #11-95 Granting a Utility Easement for Lot 8. Stanley Historic District. Staff reported that the owner of Lot 9 is requesting an easement from the Town to cross Lot 8 to tap into an existing sewer manhole. Attorney White read the ordinance, and, as there was no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Ordinance be approved contingent upon the Owner of Lot 9 ensuring little or no damage disturbance on Lot 8, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted, ordered it numbered 11-95, and published according to law. Board of Trustees - July 25, 1995 - Page 5 5. A. Municival Building Paint and Trim - Request to Proceed and Expend Funds. B. Police Department Roof Replacement - Request to Proceed and Expend Funds. Construction and Facilities Manager Sievers reported that due to the cancellation of the July 27 Public Works meeting, the two above-mentioned requests were being submitted directly to t the Town Board. The 1995 Budget contains $17,000 for ! repainting and maintenance improvements to the exterior of the Municipal Building. The building was last painted in 1983. Staff requested authorization to expend $12,000 for painting preparation; actual painting will be proposed in the 1996 Budget. The 1995 Budget also contains $7,000 for replacing the asphalt and gravel roof of the Police Department wing of the Municipal Building. The existing roof has had numerous leaks for the last few years and is due for replacement. It was moved and seconded (Marshall/Gillette) Items SA and 5B be approved as presented, authorizing staff to proceed and expend the funds, and it passed unanimously. 6. Town Administrator's Report: A. CIRSA has awarded a Motor Vehicle Safety Award to the Town for 1994. B. The Board will conduct a Budget Study Session July 25 from 7:00 - 8:30 A.M. to discuss capital improvements for ~ 1996. Following completion of all agenda items, Trustee Gillette commented on the need for dependable zoning regulations, adding that ordinances should be in place so as to avoid grey areas. There being no further business, Mayor Dannels adjourned the ~ meeting at 9:46 P.M. H. B. Dannels, Mayor ................. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk ~, BRADFOROPUILISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee August 3, 1995 Committee: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: Chairman Doylen, Trustee Marshall Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Directors Stamey, Kilsdonk, Hinze, and Pickering, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Trustee Dekker, Advertising Manager Marsh Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 1995 Advertising Report. Director Stamey reported that as of June 30, requests for information were down 18.5% from the same period in 1994. Removing USA Weekend from prior years for comparison, places 1995 counts 2.8% off the pace set in 1994. As of July 23, after 10% weeks of exposure, incoming 800 calls total 38,498, a minute decrease of .4% as compared to the same period last year. Internet responses indicate the web site has been visited by 4,867 individuals, and, from that level of visitation, generated 120 requests for information. Staff is tracking requests via the Internet and will be able to evaluate the responses with the Conversion Study. Copies of two Fall ads listing the web address were presented. The value of print clippings for the first half of 1995 is $22,268.97 which is a 9% gain over the first half of 1994. Special coverage articles about Estes Park were in the Denver Business Journal, Ladies Home Journal, Miami herald, First Magazine, and the Boston Globe, for a combined value of $101,411.79. Sally Anderson/Market Reach, reported her firm is now receiving clippings; the Arts in the Parks publicity relates to an ad value of $3,500; Market Reach is very active in providing weather advisories. Chairman Doylen reported on a meeting held July 28th with merchants and other interested parties relative to the status of the remaining summer tourist season/sales tax collections. Additional information will be forthcoming. Conference Center Report. Director Pickering reported on the following: Four-Year Performance Check Total conference attendees ................ 56,135 1990 Accommodation Sales Tax Collected .. $428,035 (Ranked 4th behind groceries, restaurants, gift shops). 1994 Accommodations Sales Tax Collected . $722 ,535 (Ranked #1 among sales tax contributors). BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS community Development Committee - August 3, 1995 - Page 2 Seasonal Tax Growth Accommodation Sales Tax contributions for January through December (excludes June, July, August and September): 1990 - $112,778 1994 - $228,717 Hotel Re-Investment Surges With increased revenues to the hotels, refurbishing is in full swing: the Holiday Inn will begin a $4 Million plan beginning in August; the Stanley Hotel begins a $3 Million plan in October which includes adding 20 suites to the Manor House; the Best Western Lake Estes, Silver Saddle, Comfort Inn, and the Inn at Estes have all completed major remodels. The goal is to have 600 newly remodeled rooms by 1997. Staff will capitalize on this substantial renovation effort. Forecast for the Future The forecast for the Conference Center indicates a continued path of filling existing hotel rooms in the value season. The potential up-side of these hotel room rates resulting from the remodeling of the hotels and the expansion of the season from conference bookings, should continue to produce major contributions in sales tax for the Town. Conference Marketing Fund Under the direction of the Community Development Committee, the Conference Marketing Fund has been implemented to reduce the contribution of tax dollars in marketing and servicing conferences. With dollars coming from the hotels housing the conference attendees, functions such as conference transportation are now paid with the user's monies. This fund is administered by the Chamber of Commerce. Miscellaneous The Conference Center will hosting the John Fielder Photo Exhibit from September through December, 1995 aimed at promoting RMNP. A multi-media show will be held September 21st, during the Western Wildlife conference. Mr. Fielder was granted permission by RMNP to photograph areas never before travelled by the public. Director Pickering commended Carolyn Jones as she played an integral role in the coordination of this show. Approximately 600 photo-journalists will attend the conference. Staff reviewed upcoming conferences, reporting Estes Park is hosting the Society of Government Meeting Planners. This group includes ninety of the top meeting planners for the State. MUSEUM. Director Kilsdonk reported that the Eagle Plume Collection opened July 21 with approximately 130 people attending. A ~RADFORD PU~LIIHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - August 3, 1995 - Page 3 related program held July 20, "The Eagle Plume Collection: A Closer Look" by Nico Strange Owl, attracted over 100 people. The exhibit is on display until October 23. On August 17, Hank Pedersen will present "Joy, The Life of Charles Eagle Plume." On August 27, the Museum will host the Johnny Dillon Day display of vintage automobiles. Director Kilsdonk commended the Museum Friends for their success on the Riverside Remembered Dance fundraiser held July 29. The Committee conveyed their support to Chairman Lennie Bemiss on her illness. Year-to-date attendance through June is: 2,056 visitors and 436 Museum Friends members. Terri Schindel, a conservator at the Buffalo Bill Museum in Cody, WY is offering a one-week course on the care of collections through Central Wyoming College in Lander. Ms. Schindel taught a similar course in 1992, using the Estes Park Museum as a lab site. Ms. Schindel has requested the use of the Estes Park Museum as a Colorado location for her class. This is an exciting opportunity for the Museum. Staff will gain increased knowledge about caring for particular objects in the Museum's collection, at no cost. SPECIAL EVENTS. Rooftop Rodeo Report. Gary O'Connor, President expressed his appreciation to the Town Board, Director Hinze and her staff for their support of Rooftop Rodeo. Terry Don West, the third-ranked bull rider participated in this year's rodeo-- evidence that the improved event is drawing distinguished participants. Approximately 1,000 volunteer hours were expended by 30 members. The event was very successful with nearly the same attendance levels as in 1994. Approximately 1,690 people attended the Western Heritage Days celebration. Gate fees were not collected for children four and under and the Rooftop Committee believes attendance counts exceeded 2,000. The Committee expressed their appreciation to Rooftop Committee members for their positive efforts. Top Hands Report. Jo Adams, President, reported the Organization contributed over $4,000 to Rooftop for 1995, plus they sponsored the pony rides and Mountain Men contest prizes in Western Heritage. The new sheriff's badge fundraiser was very successful, as well as the Baxter Black and Cowboy Poet's Events. The Committee expressed their admiration to the Top Hands members for their support of Rooftop Rodeo. Faircrounds and Tent Rental Policies. Director Hinze presented a rental policy outlining guidelines for the fairground operation/rental, and rules for usage of the tents as prepared by staff. Fencinq Proiect Bids. The 1995 Budget contains $8,000 for perimeter fencing along a portion of Manford Avenue (400't), and a bid was received from Rocky Mountain Deck & Fence/Longmont for $3,091. The installation bid was submitted by Chief's Landscaping for $1,580. The Committee recommends accepting both bids as identified above, for a total expenditure of $4,6711. BRAOFORD/UILISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - August 3, 1995 - Page 4 Special Event Evaluations. 1995 Wool Market. This fifth-year event is held the second week of June. Commercial vendors and alpacas are at a maximum without additional facilities. However, staff believes this situation is acceptable as the quality can be controlled. There is a vast need for fiber education and a place for breeders to promote their animals in our area. With favorable weather, the spectator numbers should continue to increase. Workshops bring attendees to Estes Park for four days providing good revenue, both for the Town and the event. The 11ama and alpaca numbers increased in 1995; Estes Park is now the largest 11ama and alpaca show in the world. Sheep were down as a sheep specialty show was not included in 1995; such a show will be planned for 1996. The Estes Park Wool Market, in just five years, is one of the top three fiber festivals in the United States. The Alpaca Association will be relocating its convention to Denver in 1996. Alpaca exhibitors may decrease; however, staff believes the major breeders will participate due to the large audience in Estes Park. Horse Shows. The Colorado Quarter Horse Show was held in Estes Park for its tenth year. This show has grown from a 2-day show to a 4-day show since 1990 by adding Buckskin and Palomino horses. The Rocky Mountain Miniature Horse Show is a manageable show to have on the grounds for staff and they have voted to return for their 12th year (1996). Staff anticipates that future participants for the Arabian Horse Show should remain at approximately 220-240 horses. Scandinavian Club. This second year event is a good addition to the June events schedule. Town employee involvement and advertising were minimal. This could become a substantial large audience event. Rooftop Rodeo Events. The 1995 Rodeo was successful. Western Heritage Days was initiated this year and the Rooftop Rodeo Committee had good ideas and organization. Inclement weather during the afternoons had a negative effect on attendance. Western Heritage garnered local support. The Hunter-Jumper Show is currently at the fairgrounds and this group has the most economic value to the Town as they are in Estes Park fourteen days. The next horse show is the Westernaires scheduled August 11 and 12. A Bond Park Use Permit has been obtained by the Sunrise Rotary Club for "Autumn Gold" scheduled September 23 and 24, 1995. This event has been expanded and will include food and beverage booths. The Club is currently applying for a Special Events Liquor Permit. The Committee commended Director Hinze. CULTURAL ARTS COUNCIL. Lynda Vogel reported on the 1995/96 Re-gifting Grant Program. The Grants totaled $8,485 and were distributed to ten local arts organizations and individuals from money made available BRADFORD PU'LI'HING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - August 3, 1995 - Page 5 by the Town ($11,115). Six of the awards will either directly or indirectly benefit students of the Park School District by bringing the Cleo Parker Robinson Dance Troupe in for performances. Funds to the Estes Park Music Festival will bring the Colorado Children's Chorale for outreach performances, and support to the Fine Arts Guild helped sponsor an artist residency by local puppeteer Bob Aiken with hands-on activities by elementary students. A grant to the Library for performance fees and arts materials will provide a literary/multi-arts program which incorporates fine literature and arts. An anonymous Grant Review Panel comprised of four individuals outside the Estes Park community administered the program. Funding was based upon community benefit, proposal merit, applicant competence, quality of work, feasibility, and appropriateness to the Re-gifting Program. Paul Saunders, President/CACEP reviewed the Arts for the Parks Exhibition held June 9 - 20 at the Estes Park Elementary School Gymnasium. Ms. Vogel reported on funding contributions, and reported approximately 1,000 hours+ were donated by 100 volunteers. CACEP is considering providing similar shows once/year. Mr. Saunders commended the Trail Gazette and KRKI for their publicity, freely given. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the : meeting at 9:28 A.M. 41LL o (1~4 12*~ Vickie O'Connor, CMC/AAE, Town Clerk AUG-03-1995 11:51 HAMMOND, CLARK & WHITE 3036699380 P.03 r STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF LARIMER ) . TOWN OFESTES PARK ) Thc Board of Trustees of thc Town of Estcs Pazk. Colorado, met in regular sesgion in full conformity with law and the rules and ordinances of the Town at the Town Hall. 170 Ma©Gregor Avenue, in Estes Park, Colorado, on Tuesday, the Bth day of August, 1995, at 7:30 P.M. Upon roll call the following members were present constituting a quorum: Mayor: H. Bemerd Dannets Mayor Pro-Tem: Rot=t L Dekker Trustees: Susan L Doylen Stephen W. Gillette Waliam J. Marshall Michael R Miller J. Donald Pauley Also Present Town Manager: Gmy Klaphake Town Attorney: Oregoty White, Esq. Absent Thczeupon Trustee introduced and therewas readthc following Ordinance: 0103/11 z•n m CROZN )GANNG AMH 00:0 999•¤ DZ:IT 96/CO/90 ORDINANCE NO., Senes 1995 AN ORDINANCE CREATING PARK ENTRANCE ESTATES SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 95-1. IN THE TOWN OF ESIES PARK. COLORADO; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION THEREIN OF CERTAIN MJBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; ADOFIINGDETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR; PROVIDING FOR AN ELECTION REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMENT FOR SAID PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER DETAILS IN CONNEC11ON WITH THE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, piasuant to and in accordance with Title 31, Articic 25, Part 5. C.R.S.. 11=e has bc= submitted tothe Town Board (the -Boiud") ofthe Town of Estes Park Ohe *Town") petitions fromp,operty owners fbrcatain public improvements and forthecreation of aspecialimmovement district (the "Petitions-); and WIIEREAS, tbe Board previously has made a finding that the Petitions wereprescnied in accordance with law andthatthey were signed by owners of propaty to be assessed for morethan one-half ofthe total costs ofthe improvements to be assessed ineachofthe assessment units; and WHEREAS, the Town has dete:mined and hereby Snds that a public hearing was duly noticedaod held according to law om August 8,1995, at 700 p.m„ und such he=ing resulted in no objections; and WHEREAS, the Town hemby dete:mines that a special improvement district should be crealed, thattbc public improvements petitioned for should be cons•uctcd, installed, und acquired therein in the =uncr set foah in that Gert,in resolution adopted by the Reardon July 11, 1995 (the "Resolution"): and WHEREAS, the engineer for The proposed special improvement projec4 who is the Town Engincer. has prepared and filed preliminary plans. specifications. cstimate of cost, maps, and schedules for the proposed improvcments and the Board has entered an order approving such proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, in ago,dance with Scution 31-25-503(31 CAS. the Town engineel has submitted to the Board adetailed estimate of the total enst of the improvements and a detailed estimate of cost for each improvement included within the District. exclusive of incidental costs, -2. Coom (90£N HEAN36 0211 0020 9988 92:Tr 98/90/90 AUG-03-1995 11:52 HAMMOND, CLARK & WHITE 3036699380 P.05 which estimates are not binding upon the Town forany purpose; full details and specifications for thc proposed construdons which said details and specifications shall pmnit and encourage competition among bidders; and amap showing the real pmpe:ty to be assessed forthe cost of Construction; =1 WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been prepared and is hacby submitted to the Board authorizing the creation of a special implovement district and the construction of the public improvements proposed to be constructed therein; THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO, ORDAINS: Section 1. Crmtion-a£Di~ict. Pumwmt to Title 31, A•iele 25, Part 5, C.R.S., and the Petition and the Resolution, a :pwial imp,ovement district for the construction ed installation of certain local water distibution system improvements and local roadway improvements (the "project-1 is hemby created and established, and shall bc tmown md designated as "Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District No. 95-1' (the "District"). Section 2. Boundarv of District Ihe Imd within the District shall consist of the real p,operty described as follows: LEGAL DISCRIMION Park Entrance Pstates Addition m the Town of Estes Palk. L=ima County, Colorado Section 3. U#cription of Pmject The Project and the maaials to bc used will comist of the following: g./-2 (a) local water distribution system improvements using p,imarily ductile iron pipe, which include but arenot limited tothe improvement ofthe wamr distribution system within Block 2 of the Park Entrance Estates Subdivision, including the removal of -3- 01-12 *nnia con/,1 WgiNg,1 nX,1 nozo 99*.a SZ:II 98/£0/90 theament water distribution system andtheinstallation ofanow water dimibution system; and (b) local roadway improveme- using primatily *spholt, which include but are Ilol limied to the imiwovement of all public streets within the Park Entrange Estates subdivision except Sumise Lane from its intersection with Meadow Circle =d Valley View Drive from its intersection with Hein: Parkway, including widening paving, ad installation of approp:iate dminage facilities The implovcmcm*s and cslimated assessments are described in more detail in the pmliminmy easince:ing report on file in the oface of the Town Engineer. Section 4. Appro,Bl of Engine=in, Mans. 11= enginee:ing mpo•s, together with the picliminary details, spccilications, estimates of cost, maps, and schedules prepared and filed with the Board, are hcreby apploved and adopted. Section 5. E[gi=Autholimt Tbe Project m shown by the plans. specificazions, ind maps prepared by the engineer mid approved by the Board. and now on Sle inthe office of the Town Eogineer, is heteby mihorized andordered Section 6. Costi,(Rmi.k Methodof A=ssmenL Th© estimated total cost of the Project is Dollan ($ 1 plus . amount not exceeding percent l_%) additional Gr costs of collection of the assessments and _ Dollars ($ )for incidcat,ls, all of which will be derived fkom asse=nents againstreal propetty included within the District It is anicipated that the Toum will pay one-half of the mataill costs of the asphalt to be used in the local roadway improvemems. The Town wilinot pay amy other pan ofthe cost ofthc Project except to the extcm lhal an assessment ismade against propely ovmed bythe Town. The method of assessment ofcost shall bconanequal. per-lot basis. Scgtion 7. Payn #:pfAs..m=lts The asses=nents will be due and payable without demand within thirty (30) days Som and aftertlic final publication ofthc Ordinance assessing the whole cost of the Project aping tha rcal propeily in the Distlict In the event anyowner of real plopere, shall fkil to pay the whole of such assessment igainst his or her property within said thirty 00) days, then the whole cost ofthc PMject so assessed against suchplopeny shall be payable in 010*12 -4- 900 01 CROLN *RAN,a O:m 0020 9990 91:II 56/£0/80 AUG-03-1995 11:53 HAMMOND, CLARK & WHITE 3036699380 P.07 not more th•n ten (10) equal minual installment• of prlizipal. The first of such installments of p,incipal shall bed,=andpayable successively onthesameday ineach ye:Nt=cafter, imtil all are paid in full. Therate of ime:estrobe paid onunpaid and dc&:mdinslallments shallbcata rate not cou=ding % per In=. and will bc cstablimhed by an ordinance to be adomed by the Board. Semiong. Smi,LA===allonds:Election. Byvinueof md pursuant =Section 31-25. 503. CAS. a special election shall bc held within the botmd.ics of the Disnict to autho:ize the issuance of special assoisment bonds ofthe Town forth, pufpose of paying the cost ofthe Project, in an amount not to exceed the cost =td comenses of the Project including coginee,ing, legal, and in•,iA„-1 expenses, as provided by law. Tbe bandi shall be issued based upon estimates approv©d by the Board, md as authorized by the qualified elecmrs voting inthe election and by = ordinance to be passed by the Bo•rd. 11- maicimum oct cffective interestrate ofthe bonds ibr the Disvict shall 1*Eleted 56 per =•mm The bonds and the int„est th-OR $1.11 be payable solely out of special asiessment• to belevied apinst the real property included within the District and specially benented by the Proj-, Or &0111 0]!•11 ifany, remaining inthe constnlction fund alter the payment ofall costs and expenses of the construction ofthe im,ovanent. Section 9. Construction€ontracts. The actions of thc approptiate oficers of the Town in obtaining bids to construct the Project in accordance with the mquirements of the petition and the cogineering repon archereby ratified. Such bids have been solicited in the time and manner reqtbred by Tille 31, Article 25, Part 5, CAS. Sedion 10. Special Bcoch. The Board hereby ands and det.mines that the hoject will confir a special b,••fit upon the piopetty within the District Section 11 Ei~lingim:LUmil=•ligol.U.10-1!MitianlilMi.I~UWkH21illg, ThcBoardheteby finds and dele:mines tbat the PHidom wue piwented in =ordance with law,lhatthey weresigned by the ownes of p:opaty to beaggessed formorethan one.half ofthetotalcost ofthe imrrov•menf tobeassessed in each of the assessment units,and that af•r due notice m thcpublic a public hc=ing was held and any and all complaints and objections made in writing to the Town regarding the creation ofthe District =re heard and resolved by the Board. Section 12. Rcpcakt All acts. olders, ordinaDCCS. or resolutions. or parts themot in conflict herewith, are heicby repealed to the extent of such connict -5- 90001 (904.N HEAN36 OER 00:0 9900 92:TT 90/Co/90 Section 13. Sevetabil*. Shoujd any oi of more sections or provisions ofthis Ordinance be judicially det¤mined invalid or uncnforceable, such determination shall not am,ct. impair. or invalidate the remaining pmvisions hereof, the intention being that the various provisions hereof me sevecable. Section 14. This Ordinance, immediately on its passage, shall be recorded in th, Town Book of Ordinance kept for that purpose, shall be mnhenticated by the signatures ofthe Mayor and Town Cle!14 and shall be published in accordance with law. Section 15. Eir=tinp•e. This Ordinance shall be eirective, in accordance with law, thirty days following its final adoption bythe Board. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED at aregular meeting ofthe Board on August 8, 1993, and ordered published in accordance with law. (SEAL) Mayor ATTESTED: Town Clerk Form endorsed by: Gregoly White, Esq., Town Amrney Trustuc then movedthat the foregoing Ordinance as mtroduced, mad at this mecting, be adopted and be published intlic Estcs Park News, a newspaper in genera] circulation wilhin the Town, in the ismle 1-4 , August- 1995. Trustee seconded the motion. The question being upon tho adoption of the motion, the roll was called with the following result /10*12 £00 . CROLN 2GAN16 0*H 0010 9990 42:TT 56/Co/90 Those voting YES: IL Remerd Dannels Robert L. Dekkor Susan L. Doylcn Steph•m W. Gilleac William J. Marshall Michael E. Miller J. Donald Pauley Those voting NO: Dione The presiding officer thereupon declared that not less than a mqiority of all the members elect ofthe Board having voted in favor thereof, the motion was carried. 11.raq,on, after consideration of other matters to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned (SEAL) Town Clerk -7- #103912 enn B CROLN HIAN36 ONH OOZO 99849& LZ:II 96/Co/90 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. , the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has created the Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District No. 95-1 (the "District") ; and WHEREAS, also, by Ordinance NO. , the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has authorized the acquisition and construction of certain water distribution system improvements and roadway improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, in order to finance the acquisition and construction of the improvements, it is the intention of the Town to seek approval of the issuance of Special Assessment Bonds, pursuant to the applicable provisions of Section 5, Article 25, Title 31, C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the first date available to the Town to hold said election is November 7, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town has determined that pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-25-534(3) C.R.S., that only registered electors who are owners of property within or residents of the District shall be eligible to vote on the question of the issuance of the Special Assessment Bonds; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize certain other actions concerning said election. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado: Section 1. The Board of Trustees hereby finds and determines that an election to authorize the issuance of Special Assessment Bonds for the acquisition and construction of roadway and water distribution system improvements within the Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District No. 95-1 shall be held on November 7, 1995. Section 2. The Board of Trustees hereby finds and determines that those persons eligible to vote on the question of the issuance of said Special Assessment Bonds shall only be registered electors who are owners of property within or residents of the Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District No. 95-1. Section 3. The Board of Trustees hereby authorizes the appropriate employees and agents of the Town to prepare all necessary Resolutions and/or Ordinances including, but not limited to, the wording of the ballot question, for submission to the Board at a later date. Section 4. The Board Of Trustees also authorizes the appropriate officials of the Town of Estes Park to execute the agreement concerning coordinated election services dated the 20th day of July, 1995 between the Town and Larimer County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder. Section 5. The Board of Trustees also finds and determines that the boundary of the area to be used for the purpose of Article 5, Title 1, C.R.S., shall be the boundary of the Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District No. 95-1. The single polling place for said election shall be held in Room 202/203 of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado 80517. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF AUGUST, 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-110, C.R.S., hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the following described area that the requirements of the applicable parts of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., have been met; that an election is not required under Section 31-12-107 (2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the annexation. The area eligible for annexation known as the "MANSKE ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park is as follows: Property located is in the SE i of the SW 4 of Section 31, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as beginning at the SE corner of said Reid Addition, thence S00048' E a distance of 210.00', thence N73°35' W a distance of 379.45'; thence N43°42'20" E a distance of 97.33'; thence N26°29'40" E a distance of 161.92'; thence S62018' E a distance of 247.69' to the point of beginning. Containing 1.54 acres, more or less. DATED this day of , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS MANSKE ADDITION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a Petition for Annexation, together with four (4) copies of the plat of said area as required by law, was filed with the Board of Trustees on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the landowners of one hundred percent (100%) of the area and owning one hundred percent (100%) of the area, excluding public streets and alleys, of the area hereinafter described. The Board, by Resolution at its regular meeting on the 9th day of May, 1995, accepted said Petition and found and determined that the provisions of Section 31-12-107(1) (g), C.R.S., were met; and the Board further determined that a public hearing should be held on August 8, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Municipal Building for the purposes of determining that the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., and is considered eligible for annexation. Section 2. That the Notice of said hearing was given and published as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R. S. Section 3. That the hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-12-109, C.R.S., on the 8th day of August, 1995. Section 4. That following said hearing, the Board of Trustees adopted a Resolution determining that the proposed annexation met the requirements of the applicable parts of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S.; that an election was not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms or conditions are to be imposed upon said annexation. Section 5. That the annexation of the following described area designated as MANSKE ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park, is hereby approved: Property located is in the SE % of the SW % of Section 31, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as beginning at the SE corner of said Reid Addition, thence SOO°48' E a distance of 210.00', thence N73°35' W a distance of 379.45'; thence N43°42'20" E a distance of 97.33'; thence N26°29'40" E a distance of 161.92'; thence S62°18' E a distance of 247.69' to the point of beginning. Containing 1.54 acres, more or less. Section 6. The Town of Estes Park, Colorado, hereby consents, pursuant to Section 37-45-126(3.6) C.R.S., to the inclusion of lands described above into the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 8th day of August, 1995, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1995. Town Clerk ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ADDING MANSKE ADDITION TO R-S RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WHEREAS, the annexation of Manske Addition was accomplished on the 8th day of August, 1995; and WHEREAS, following testimony, the Board of Trustees have determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to zone Manske Addition to the Town of Estes Park as-RESJResidential. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Manske Addition be zoned as R-S Residential. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and subsequent publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 8th day of August, 1995, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1995. Town Clerk ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ADDING MANSKE ADDITION TO R-M RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WHEREAS, the annexation of Manske Addition was accomplished on the 8th day of August, 1995; and WHEREAS, following testimony, the Board of Trustees have determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to zone Manske Addition to the Town of Estes Park asUNRRZ)Residential. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Manske Addition be zoned as R-M Residential. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and subsequent publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 8th day of August, 1995, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1995. Town Clerk . 1 I , Town of Estes Park. Larim.r County. Colorado, . . JUDe. 2.0. . . ., 19. . 9.5 MANSKE ANNEXATION. A.A. Administrator Klaphake stated that pursuant to State Statute requirements, the special meeting was called to meet annexation petition deadlines. The Planning Commission reviews potential annexations as a courtesy and, thus, forwards any recommendations to the Town Board. The Planning Commission met on this date at 8:00 A.M. where they considered the annexation; however, due to subsequent neighborhood concerns with the proposed high-density development, request from County E-Estate zoning to Town R-M Multi-family zoning, and the lengthy Planning Commission agenda, the minutes were unavailable to the Town Board. Administrator Klaphake outlined three options: accept the Planning Commission recommendations; reject the Planning Commission recommendations; or continue the public hearing to July 25, 1995· As there was insufficient information at this time, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall) the public hearing for the annexation of Manske Addition be continued to July 25, 1995, and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees - July 25, 1995 - Page 2 a-, Manske Addition Annexation. Staff advised that a valid petition opposing the zoning change for this property had been t submitted, and such action requires that five Trustees be present. Four members were present, and Trustee Pauley notified the Town late Tuesday afternoon that he would be unable to attend the meeting. Trustee Pauley was reached and i he advised that he could be present by 9:15 P.M. Thus, Mayor Dannels noted that this item would be considered at approximately 9:15 P.M. Applicant's Representative Van Horn stated that the Applicant is requesting the item be continued as he (Mr. Van Horn) was advised by staff at 5:00 P.M. that the requisite number of : Trustees would not be present. Concern was expressed with continuing the hearing for the residents who were in attendance. Town Attorney White clarified the status of the public hearing relative to a quorum of five members, and it was moved and seconded (Dekker/Gillette) the Manske Addition Annexation be continued to August 8, 1995, and it passed unanimously. Trustee Doylen urged affected residents who may be unable to attend the August 8 public hearing to forward correspondence to the Town. Planning Commission June 20, 1995 2€ ANNEXATION. Manske Addition -- _Ann,xat:Lon and Zoning. Glen & Margaret Manske/Applicants. Chairman sager reviewed the rules of participation for Public Hearings, and opened the Public Hearing. Director Stamey clarified that two separate items are being considered: annexation and establishment of zoning. Applicant's Representative Bill Van Horn stated the Applicant is proposing to annex this 1.54 Tcre site and is requesting R- M Multiple Family zoning for construction of twelve dwelling units. The property is currently zoned E-Estate, County- Director Stamey reported area zoning and uses as follows: North: R-M Residential Multiple Family, Single Family; South: E-Estate, County, Single Family; East: R-S Residential. Single Family; West: E-Estate, County, Single Family. The 1978 Estes Park Comprehensive Plan recommended a future land use for this area of Residential, defined as 0.6 acres per dwelling unit. A petition opposing the proposed zoning had been submitted, containing 45 signatures of surrounding property owners. Senior Planner joseph presented maps displaying the existing zoning and land use, resident locations in opposition to R-M zoning, and petitioners who reside within 100 ft. of the proposed Manske Addition- Chairman Sager noted that letters of opposition were received from James Mack, 1010 Acacia Dr.; Mary Coen, 1731 Avalon Dr.; Barb Ludwig, 1119 Brook Dr.; and William and Virginia Swim, 1660 Clover Ln. The following area residents spoke in opposition to the proposed R-M Zoning, noting drainage problems, environmental impacts, elk and deer migration, decreased property values, pollution, destruction of view corridors, increased traffic, loss of privacy, and public safety issues: Harold Allen, 1750 S. St. Vrain Ave.; Lynda Vogel, 1129 Brook Dr.; Jeannette Villers, 1720 Avalon Dr.; and Jeanie Tippin, 1641 Avalon Dr. In addition, Sally Badali, on behalf of her father, Frank Burke, 1041 Acacia Dr., stated that the surrounding property is established as single-family housing and the property owners should be assured the proposed Manske Addition would be the same. Mary Coen, 1731 Avalon Dr., previous owner of the property, understood a deed restriction could not be attached to the buildings or their placement on the property. Austin Condon, Margaret Clark, and Bryan Michener, representing EVIA, disagreed with the proposed zoning. There were no property owners, nor correspondence received, in favor of the proposal. Property owners are, however, in favor of the annexation. Representative Van Horn stated that zoning for the area is being established, not modified, due to the annexation; when land is annexed, it is removed from a rural situation to urban status; the development will be planned to preserve mature trees; the development does not eliminate elk migration; and the proposed plan will* not encroach on view corridors. Staff recommends annexation with R-S Residential Single Family zoning, allowing the site to be subdivided into three single- family lots or two duplex lots. The property to be annexed will be included in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District or Sub-District. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Sager closed the Public Hearing. It was moved and seconded (Burgess-Hix) that the Manske Addition Annexation, with R-S Single Family zoning. be favorably recommended to the Board Of Trustees. and it passed unanimously. Commissioner Burgess stated that her rationale for R-S Zoning included: response from the neighborhood and the 1978 Comprehensive Plan. June 7, 1995 Estes Park Planning Commission and Town Board of Trustess Community Development Department P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Planning Commission and Town Board of Trustees: We the property owners (undersigned) wish to make known our concerns in regard to the review and decision of annexation and a zoning change for the following property: SE 1/4 SW 1/4, SECTION 31, T5N, R73W, WEST OF INTERSECTION OF BROOK DRIVE AND AVALON DRIVE, as applied for by Glenn and Margaret Manske. We unanimously OPPOSE the request for the change in zoning from E-Estate to R-M Multinle Familv and the proposed multi-family residential use on 1.54 acres. The proposal of six buildings. 2 units each does not comply with the surrounding single family residences, and this request for spot zoning is not acceptable. It would result in ruining our quality of life by adding congestion, additional un-necessary traffic, destroy a very well used elk and deer migratory trail and habitat, create a dangerous intersection, and create a drainage problem in a natural draw (density and pavement would leave no vacant ground for water absorption therefore running east downhilD. Six buildings with two units each means 12 families, 24 cars or more, paved parking areas, all on 1.54 acres. Avalon Drive is two blocks in length, and the traffic is already heavy with commercial and residential usage. We have many children in our neighborhood (Avalon, Brook Drive, Acacia), who walk on the street to the school bus stop. Also many residents walk on this street, and because there are no sidewalks travel at risk with the heavy traffic. Any increase in zoning density will increase public safety concerns. As property owners, we bought our homes for the large lots (most 1/2 acre or more), views (proposed units are two-story and would destroy this for some) and the single family aspect of the neighborhood. We believed in good faith, that the Estes Park existing zoning would remain the same density. We request that you deny this zoning change from E-Estate to R-M Multiple Family. Respectfully, Name Street Address/Mailing Address Date (Sign*.Print) ~ 1. L't--<SLoe.~-; C.Actv k.-Skooe|m- /650 Ave,18* 71.r. 1791 : E-F, CO. 70(ID 6/7/1 0~~'rggy:~~~~_ (.H©t>* 4 -VokEL 1139 TRPOO \4- Bo* 4.0-3),EP.0.0 80517 0/7/ 4· - l.4 £-1 .4~·f.{A ~-,-·~261,..LA- JAMes& LI,iliam<r. IND 8/acK {Nr. EP C-i 95=<7 -7 4 GI £-A ~. C.~, k )AB.e c A .1/1,1/,A Al<..a llaa 4rod< IAr. EP Ce Pf,1,7 4 L| P N .1 e 4271 9 . /- , Ut / <',e re 17 *r, A ..t,4 ( --Or .rEPOPH-/7 I./ . Name Street Address/Mailing Address Date cs *f*#.~,ig 3** e -*4.41 Q ce- /1 / X..A. C*'6rl- A. ( le-rs ( 1 16 Auaie € A /9 «7 i 73- 80,1*M C, Lulivio Ill4 8rookbrive· El).(4)91)519 0-1-95 o. £5/;1*04 Braain Dea <JA. 1 #o Cpont rv elfir. 9.F (91905/7 62 9. %4.~.a-1 72 ,¢2:ZL 44 A 2-5 J) M. ALLGE 19€6 Stemt. er do•-01, 3Atio. 6. ACiER€ V. ALLEN {75'2 9*,ITA Sr. VE?Ah,7 6 -7-15 11.....2 ah- O-) 6< O,~.~.n 4 DA,A' L Moot.6. 194D 900-n, St- V RAIN J ER LO 6-9-9 5 12. ~4444_-2) ~,rff Ki- you.0,1 \ 196 944 9- \/2.64*.2 P 60 Po 449 1 - t--7-35 FaA••u... A . AL Ai£ 1-7-1 0 Sol=VAA ,•1 6 -8 -95- E/,10.44 A k 8# rke- . a * 6 -8-99 15.33' . F,2.4.1,4. 4 4 4-Lact- /04/ Ac•&•* /)4. 4 -8 -54 16. c'14 --. 6--07kO-£, 8=AL .4, kE,Ne, •" " 6-9-96- 17. *6-,.«015£.A~ Al+*14,44, 4. 8,•4129 A/nvt•N M.f o.,Ic J=Duc & -8-0¥f- r/406.4,44,9 41¢44,4 Av'*S~ 31. 29.- 4.1/knu.1, Eh, 1-U, k R. ,k,/ £ 0 A+ I **C- 0.€ . 1.-t -7 ~r 19. t#9..~u L_tj h/1, *-2lpt1 dlaidia HAde 93-0 A ead la 4 9-'96 20. 7710'Uu,4 1,2Ap 'AVA) -Dhe,~64).'11:'1:k~,27~~ 1040/Ar er/a, thp.#-024 1. 11. A Oa- 1 9 KkI,Yf'10 1/)41) Ae.Aain DE to-0744 11.49<,Au grrldvd, /060 AcacIA br G -r-9 51 023.tlea.,4.1.9. ,2; mt: .#, Joil M 0, p. -76, e, n. /441 440{- 84 6- Y -95- 240. Lu,_-30-~tt,+*...L (EkeD=STr.4-1, p 10'.A t.6(·6( CU,u Al 74n 4,-2 44* 15PgA:4# J.*.h44,0 66&,06 6 )FA.Kl~A,3 /010 Ae¥,Aqull-DA, f-'i#?5 26. )*61iot.; (13-6£,Cl FA-ral CY# Mot·~ d lorD Fe Ae 14)41,!-941 27. /fla4.'. 3 4 CAP ~i W AR-C 00£16 198, AVAZO,J DIL. 4,-99-015 28.' 1.4 - 2 0,4,-4-- Tal,4 t#Ld.*c„~ ~,9 F Ve- 4 2-de Or· 4-9- 9 6 29?--r- MOU' 2%7I- M I /4. VAL..1 KAR. /,09 Ber>Ar bE. (r-8-95- 30:(}&..©AAu4441)119164*Me·u F.Arl<EQJ,UE /1)10-(Ams 3-n 11,0 -Brook 011 6 -tr€s- 31.(/az424.4dW/11.,An.42-94 0.*1-#eel N,F 60, LLI MMA an. 1/ho 1Brook OR 6-F-94- KC VAJW--rit LAERML=R 1670 33. Aw £ C ..,3. .r"I-- Pkle. E, (84•ke, /67 e rte- LL, . 4-9 - 9/9- 34. 11,1.L ·0. ,~4·u.-,4-1 - F.J,Lt-) AM A . SWI M IC An CLA,/trn f AJ L- 9 -9 C 35. l)<grfkie PS-w-t..1,;i,w V I QL,In.1/11 F S uJ i M . I 4 6 r> C LOVER- 1-R) Co l -9 -f 36.----re-JAZ/,•04 pir-0 032. 4.q le, N PGare 122%0 rircad D r.le.·-/C-C 3,LX£*n U.> tp,C:* CL /'6'7 7 5 Foo-re. I 216 Braok 11 4,-joi 38.-3440/1 851;2:~-~ -73JJ 94 '14.n 1719 6rank ©r A-/O-95 39..-AL- J J ML#-irt- L ih,·U. Li,<,Able#p 1 Jac /15,-er, k Ar. 3-&4 -&¢ .,E« Per I G= s k , ix/Ki re<,\,< br. 5,e~-C »,1. s.2 r . 1 6 f £ A1/AR 5- 4-5-1 42. hk uf IL tcp t·h-/SUCAL),T ~49 Le£ Ad st-q /4'CH464 7 0 86€. 1{39 Reade ,De trt- 3 991' 44·48/*_11 4[110 11£M 1/Wl¢ 4, -rAm ARA »2[jurn€/ 1641\ ANA-}DO bit , 52(G 45. ~~.'V+., 41G,All,¥l. ~01~Ju2 ~404£*f-- 34vdimeff )640 *146.1.. 9$6- 6110 U BRAOFO~OPUSLIS••INGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - July 18, 1995 - Page 7 Due to the number of unresolved issues yet to_beEL'didijadi"* was moved and seconded (Browni.nurag..di#-Il/:PFUWainary Plat of Mountain Park ~#/ah'*0""PE-continued to August 15, 1995, and it pa€aail-•Imrimously. Commissioners Brown and Thomas no~~0llll--they will not support the proposal without a te•terly connection. 1-; Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates at cedar Ridge. Second F ling. Richard & Ann Barlowljpplicant. The Applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 13 lots for single-family development. Due to the number of unresolved issues, this plat was continued from the June 20 meeting. Bill Van Horn, Applicant's Representative, reviewed the staff comments, and Kevin Fry/Van Horn Engineering, confirmed that a CDOT Access Permit has been applied for and the Company received a letter in June. Staff confirmed that construction plans have been submitted and approved and the modification to the roadway has been resolved. There being no public comments, it was moved and seconded (Brown/Thomas) the Final Plat of Grey Fox Estates at Cedar Ridge, Second Filing be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following to be completed prior to Town Board approval, and it passed unanimously: 1. Plat Information. • Show wetlands. Show existing structures and add a note that the structure on Lot 28 will be removed within two years. • Label easements that diagonally cross Lots 25, 29 and 30; and Lots 28 and 27, and provide dimension. • Add to Note 1: This affects Lots 22, 23 , 25, 26 and 29. Indicate purpose of cul-de-sac on Exception Tract 2 and Lot 19. Modify dedication and lienholder statements as set forth in Town Attorney White's letter of June 5, 1995. 2. Easements. • Note 4 to read: "An easement for snow fencing is granted for public use within 100 feet... Note 5 to read: "All lots have 10 foot utility easements on all lot lines unless otherwise indicated." • Add drainage easements to the plat. • Add a note to the plat that maintenance of the drainage facilities is the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association, or each lot owner if there is not an association. • Label the perimeter easement 20 feet wide. 3. Access. • The 30 foot utility and access easement on Lots 20 and 21 should not be vacated unless agreed to by Exception Tract 2. ...O.0.0 Pu.60.-Naco RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission - July 18, 1995 - Page 8 • The book and page for this access easement be labeled. 4. Construction Plans. • Modifications be made to roadway design as it relates to drainage. +:.4 I • All construction plans be approved prior to f inal plat approval, and prio# 2 to any4, 14 construction. Sanitary sewer construction plans be approved by UTSD. • All cut and fill slopes be stabilized by either re-seeding or use of retaining walls. 5. Improvements. All improvements be installed or guaranteed prior to Town Board approval. 6. Other. • A note be placed on the plat stating: "All structures should be constructed with a footage perimeter drain." 7. Acquire a CDOT Access Permit. Following completion of all agenda items, Planner Gordon commended the Planning Commission on all improvements made since 1984. Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 12:46 P.M. L<I/ Le.Au, 0 1,--.0 Vickie O' Connor, CMC/AAE, Town Clerk BRAOFOROPUIL,iMING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - July 18, 1995 - page 4 -3..-57 Amended Plat of Lot 2. James Subdivision. Tad & Dean Wariner/Applicant. This request is to divide one existing five acre lot into two lots. The lots would utilize a shared access. Representative Van Horn confirmed that the Applicant is aware that this proposal will eliminate the bed and breakfast and maintenance of horses uses previously approved on this site. Director Stamey reviewed the staff report, which included a comment requesting a building envelope be identified to ensure development does not require significant cut and fill and would be in compliance with setback requirements. As there were no comments from the audience, it was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) the Amended Plat of Lot 2, James Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. Plat information. 2. Confirmation of utility service 3. Both lots be connected to UTSD and Town water. 4. Add access maintenance agreement note. 5. The bed and breakfast and horse maintenance uses are eliminated with approval of this amended plat. 6. The building envelope be identified on the plat. 7. Owner to submit proof that the land is included in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. 8. Delete the boundary adjustment statement on the plat. 9. Acquire a CDOT Access Permit. 0 MEMORANDUM, DATE: August 2, 1995 TO: Town Board (Public Works Committee) FROM: Greg Sievers RE: 1995 Street Improvement Program CC: Bill Linnane Due to the time required to bid and let this project staff is requesting to start the process now since placement of this material is temperature dependent . Therefore, we are submitting this request prior to the August Public Works Committee meeting in order to save 5 weeks in the schedule. The 1995 budget contains $150,000 for the annual street improvement project. We are proposing to use one third of that budget toward the application of Type 11 Slurry Seal. Coverage shall be 3.5 miles of local streets. This material can extend the life of a street and delay the costs of an overlay up to as many as seven years. Candidate streets are on the attached list. There are only three companies in Colorado that produce this product. The bids are listed below for coverage of 40,000 square yards of roadway. 1. Quality Resurfacing Co., @ $0.91 / square yard = $36,400 2. Inter Mountain Resurfacing @ $1.23/square yard = $49,200 3. Vance Brothers Inc., unsolicited Staff requests to accept the low bid from Quality Resurfacing Co. and to increase the quantities to 54,945 square yards, for a proposed expenditure of $50,000. Construction scheduling is planned for late August. The remaining portion of the project for asphalt overlay will be bid soon. Those results will be brought to the 8/24 Public Works Committee meeting for review and award. That proposed construction schedule shall be mid-September. . TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1995 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TYPE 11 SLURRY SEAL, CANDIDATE STREETS 1. Grand Estates Drive 4415' 2. North Lake Avenue 1315' 3. Otis Lane 875' 4. Homesteader Lane 975' 5. East Court & 5th Street 640' 6. Morgan Street 1240' 7. Elk Meadow Court 350' 8. Mountain View Court 211' 9. Monida Court 265' 10. Peak View Drive 2400' 11. Weston Lane 330' 12. Commanche Drive 760' 13. Cyteworth Road 150' 14. Park Lane 200' 15. East Riverside Drive 1980' 16. David Drive 2170' 17. Pine River Lane & Court 1015' TOTAL LINEAR FEET 19,391' (19,391'L X 25'W) + 9 = 53,864 Square Yards 2 , 1 State Historical Fund Colorado Historical Societv I . PART VII 1 MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY SUPPORT PAGE FOR GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 1995 Completion of this document is required for all private sector applicants and must be submitted with the applicant's completed application. Please refer to page G-24 for instructions. Application Deadline Date: August 15, 1995 By signing below, it is understood that the municipality or county will not be responsiblefor the administration or completion of the below named project, and that the grant, if approved, will go directly to the private sector applicant listed below. NAME OF SUPPORTING MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY Town of Estes Park MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 1200 CITY Estes Park STATE CO ZIP 80517 MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY CONTACT PERSON Gary Klaphake, Town Admin. Phone (970) 586-5331 APPLICANT Marys Lake Lodge PROJECT CONTACT PERSON Burt Wadman, Co-Managing Partner Name Title PROJECT TITLE Roof Rehabilitation PROJECT LOCATION Marys Lake Lodge, 2625 Marvs Lake Rd. , Estes Park, CO 80517 On the back of this page, the above listed municipality or county may provide additional comments on the project. The above name municipality or county has reviewed the attached grant application, agrees to support the application and the proposed project, and hereby recommends the application be forwarded to the Colorado Historical Society for consideration to receive monies from the State Historical Fund. August 8, 1995 SIGNATURE OF LEGALLY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE H.B. Dannels, Mayor TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF ABOVE June 1995 A-11 I . IJ • State Historical Fund Colorado Historical Society PART V[[ (CONTINUED) Comments/Priorities of Municipality or County. In the space below, please provide any additional comments on the project that you would like to make as the supporting municipality or county; include the applicant's priority relative to other local projects requesting grant funds. The Town of Estes Park supports the application for roof rehabilitation of Marys Lake Lodge. The Lodge was partially destroyed by fire. Since that time, efforts have been made to restore the Lodge to physical and -, economic well-being. Z···= In 1993, the Town worked with the owners to help remodel a port_ion of Marys Lake Lodge for employee housing. The project is of particular importance because it helps - mrehabilitate'a: hiatari-diiasset .,u Theaproperty"has.gantimentalfrandormr 4':,·:·:': -·historic ivalue.: in. Estes:-·Park:tourism:.6 Only- :threer other·.examples of "Rocky Mountain Stick Architecture" remain in the area: the Golden Eagle, the Baldpate, and the Elkhorn Lodge. We give this application the number one priority in the funding cycle. We trust you will give this project serious consideration. MEMORANDUM A 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK .ia»2\ .A 2<11.0 =& -1.F" 1 £0 4 1 - /34 . fe '14.--4,243.41 .01§%,-f,)~2< A" 1* ly..0 F.'5';»f,·-:·4 'N_~ 44 ~-~tr '0~Of ~~1, a Y /- . -3·'4~Th 12'i..9'lfrn 4.1.1 / .S N -t"- - /J E)ate: August 4, 1995 To: Estes Park Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Gary Klaphake A 38-2 .0 From: Rich Widmery---30>,1~ Subject: Architect S*#i~n and Loan Negotiations Commissioner Doylen, Community Capital Corporation (our consultants), and myself formed an Architect Selection Committee. Requests for proposals were received from four architects with low-income housing experience. Three of these, Fishkin + Associates, Patrick W. Nook & Company, and Aller Lingle Architects, were interviewed by the Committee on July 26. The Committee unanimously recommends Fishkin + Associates be selected as project architect for the Lone Tree Apartments, in accordance with the terms of their proposal, at a "Not-to-Exceed" fee of $60,875, subject to review and approval of the contract by Town Attorney White. As you know, the Lone Tree Apartment project has been awarded the $150,000 Federal Home Loan Bank subsidy, to be administered by Park National Bank. Due to a change in the FHLB rules, this money will not be available for project use until the construction loan closes sometime in early 1996. Due to cash flow requirements of the project (see attached Predevelopment Schedule & Budget dated 7/26/95 prepared by Community Capital Corporation), it will be necessary for EPHA to arrange some short term financing. Preliminary indications from Mercy Housing's Loan Fund are that we could qualify for a loan of approximately $150,000 at 6.0% for up to 12 months. This type financing was anticipated and built into the original project budget, so there will be no increase in project costs. Staff recommends we enter into negotiations with Mercy for the loan, and the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to sign the appropriate documents, as long as the final terms and conditions are in substantial compliance with those described above. Attachment: Predevelopment Schedule and Budget Rn-1, :RA-: 2.1-1 . Prn Rnx 1?00 • FCTFS PARK 00 80517 • FAX (303; 586-0249 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • FAX (303) 586-6909 OTHER Lone Tree Apartments Estes Park. CO PREDEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE & BUDGET ACTIVITY Jul-95 Aug-95 Sero-95 Oct-95 Nov-95 Dec-95 Engineering/Arch. A ---x Arch.Sel. Prelim Design Design Dev. Contractor /Cost Est. 4 -- -----X ----------------- ----x Cont. Sal.Nalue Engineering/GMP1 Value Eng./ GMP2 Building Dept. Appraisal/Misc. Development Mgmnt. Legal, Survey,Title XX X Environ. Survey/Site Eng. Financing x HOME App. ACTIVITY Jan-96 Feb-96 1 Mar-96 Apr-96 May-96 Jun-96 Engineering/Arch. x 1 X X===== =---------- 1 ----- I I -- - Const. Drawings Const. Start Contractor /Cost Est. X----------------X X================ Value Eng. Final GMP Const. Start Building Dept. x x Submission Approval/Bldg.Pmts. Appraisal/Misc. X---- X Appraisal Development Mgmnt. Legal. Survey,Title Financing x ----x Perm. Ln. App. Commitment ITEM 4th Qtr. 1 st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. Total ti ~~#~1 3 rd Qtr. CHFA -'.1./111.1. - 9,807 9,807 Engineering/Arch. Il~*2 11,690 23,381 11,690 46,762 Contractor/Cost Est. . 3,000 3,000 Town Fees Appraisal/Misc. 0 2,500 7,500 10,000 Development Management 454'0_ 10,000 15,000 25,000 50,000 Legal, Title, Survey -1%064- 10,500 5,000 15,500 Financing 41®*ek ' 12,000 12,000 Other TOTALS Al*** 32,190 53,688 61,190 0 147,069 EPPRF1.XLS 7/26/95 Prepared by Community Capital Corp.