HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Transportation Advisory Board 2021-5-19
Transportation Advisory Board Agenda
Current Members: Belle Morris (03/31/23)
May 19, 2021 Lawrence Gamble (03/31/23) Gordon Slack (03/31/24)
12:00 PM – 2:00 PM Vacant (03/31/24) Tom Street (03/31/22)
Ann Finley (03/31/23) Linda Hanick (03/31/22)
VIRTUAL – Zoom Scott Moulton (03/31/22) Vacant (03/31/24)
The Transportation Advisory Board will participate in the meeting remotely due to the Declaration of
Emergency signed by Town Administrator Machalek on March 19, 2020 related to COVID-19 and provided
for with the adoption of Ordinance 04-20 on March 18, 2020
Options for the Public to Participate Remotely and Provide Public Input:
1. By Electronic Mail: Members of the public may provide public comment or comment on a specific
agenda item by sending an email to publicworks@estes.org. The email must be received by 5:00
p.m., Tuesday, May 18, 2021. All emails will be provided to the Transportation Advisory Board and
incorporated into the minutes.
2. By Telephone Message: Members of the public may provide public comment or comment on a
specific agenda item by calling (970) 577-3587. The calls must be received by 5:00 p.m., Tuesday,
May 18, 2021. All call-in information will be provided to the Transportation Advisory Board and
incorporated into the minutes.
3. No public attendance at this meeting.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DURING MEETING
Options for participation in the meeting will be available by call-in telephone option or online via Zoom
Webinar which will be moderated by the Transportation Advisory Board Chairperson.
CALL-IN (TELEPHONE OPTION):
Dial public participation phone number, Toll Free 833-548-0276
Enter the Meeting ID for the May 19, 2021 meeting 913 1736 3744 followed by the pound sign (#). The
meeting will be available beginning at 11:50 a.m. the day of the meeting. Please call into the meeting
prior to 12:00 p.m., if possible.
Request to Speak: For public comment, the Chairperson will ask attendees to indicate if they would like
to speak – phone participants will need to press *9 to “raise hand”. The Chairperson will be moderating
the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Transportation Advisory
Board. Once you are announced by phone please state your name and address for the record.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (ONLINE):
Individuals who wish to address the Board via virtual public participation can do so through Zoom
Webinar at https//zoom.us/w/91317363744 – Zoom Webinar ID: 913 1736 3744. Individuals
participating in the Zoom session should also watch the meeting through that site, and not via the
website, due to the streaming delay and possible audio interference.
Start Time: The Zoom Webinar will be available beginning at 11:50 a.m. on the day of the meeting.
Participants wanting to ensure their equipment setup is working should join prior to the start of the meeting
at 12:00 p.m.
Request to Speak: For public comments, the Chairperson will ask attendees to click the “Raise Hand” button
to indicate you would like to speak at that time. The Chairperson will moderate the Zoom session to ensure
all participants have an opportunity to address the Transportation Advisory Board.
• You will experience a short delay prior to re-connecting with the ability to speak.
• State your name and address for the record.
In order to participate, you must:
• Have an internet-enabled smartphone, laptop or computer.
o Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio experience.
• Join the Zoom Webinar.
o The link can be found above.
• Click “Participate Virtually in the Transportation Advisory Board Meeting”.
• DO NOT watch/stream the meeting via the website at the same time due to delays and possible
feedback issues.
Documents to Share: If individuals wish to present a document to the Transportation Advisory Board,
material must be emailed by Tuesday May 18, 2021 by 12:00 p.m. to the Public Works Office at
publicworks@estes.org.
AGENDA NEXT PAGE
AGENDA
Transportation Advisory Board
Wednesday, May 19, 2021
12:00 p.m.
12:00 – 12:05 Public Comment Chair Belle Morris
12:05 – 12:10 Approval of April Minutes Chair Belle Morris
12:10 – 12:30 Food Truck Policy Discussion Engineering Mgr. David Hook
Community Development Director Randy Hunt
12:30 – 1:00 Parking & Transit Updates Parking & Transit Mgr. Vanessa Solesbee
The Car Park GM, Matt Eisenberg
1:00 – 1:20 Engineering Updates Engineering Mgr. David Hook
1:20 – 1:40 Project /Administration Updates Public Works Director Greg Muhonen
1:40 – 2:00 Other Business
Adjourn
Carlie Bangs, Town Board Trustee Liaison
Greg Muhonen, Estes Park Public Works Staff Liaison
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 21, 2021
Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Transportation Advisory Board of the
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held virtually on the
21st day of April 2021.
Committee: Belle Morris, Tom Street, Ann Finley, Larry Gamble, Linda
Hanick, Scott Moulton, Gordon Slack, Ron Wilcocks
Attending: Belle Morris, Tom Street, Ann Finley, Larry Gamble, Linda
Hanick, Scott Moulton, Gordon Slack, Trustee Carlie Bangs,
Public Works Director Greg Muhonen, Engineering Mgr.
David Hook, Pavement Mgr. Ryan Barr, Parking & Transit
Mgr. Vanessa Solesbee, Rocky Mountain National Park John
Hannon, Sanderson Stewart’s Danielle Schart and Kerry
Childress, Dave Coulson of Coulson Excavating
Absent: Ron Wilcocks
Chair Morris called the meeting to order at 12:02 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENT
No electronic submissions of public comment were received prior to the deadline and no
public was in attendance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made and seconded (Slack/Hanick) to approve the March meeting
minutes with minor edits and all were in favor.
GRAVES AVE. IMPROVEMENTS - PRESENTATION (Consultant Sanderson Stewart)
Manager Barr introduced members of the Sanderson Stewart consulting team, Danielle
Schart and Kerry Childress. The team has arrived at the conceptual design stage.
Today the presentation will begin with an overview of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
process and will move into the conceptual designs. Schart shared a presentation with
the PAB that will be included in the Town Board approval of the minutes from today’s
meeting. From a national perspective, Schart reviewed the statistics showing that most
children are now driven to school rather than walking or biking. As traffic increases,
parents become more convinced the children should not walk to school. While
promoting walking and biking is ideal to increase physical activity, it must be safe for
them to do so.
This activity is important not only for improved physical and mental health, reducing
childhood obesity and diabetes trends, but it also reduces traffic congestion and
emissions in the community. Physical activity also helps with academics.
Barriers to safe walking/biking were then discussed. Schools used to be smaller and
located within the neighborhoods, encouraging student travel. Currently, schools are
larger and are located outside the neighborhoods.
More communities are making SRTS programs a priority and putting measures into
common practice. It takes both the schools and the parents, working collaboratively, to
succeed in making an impact.
Schart then handed the presentation to Kerry Childress for the Graves Avenue
conceptual design review. Childress began by discussing the background on how
community information was collected to arrive at the designs, stating much excitement
was shown for a new sidewalk/trail, and began discussing the three established options.
• Option 1: 8-ft wide multimodal path on the north side of Graves Ave.,
connecting with the existing path at O’Reilly’s Automotive, and allows a mid-
block pedestrian crossing. The total cost for Option 1 would be $287,500. All
Transportation Advisory Board – April 21, 2021 – Page 2
work would occur within existing Town Right of Way, so no easement costs
are needed.
• Option 2: 5-ft wide sidewalk on the south side of Graves Ave., aligned with
the existing sidewalk at Remax. On-street parking would be retained and
would allow a mid-block pedestrian crossing. Easements would need
acquired bringing the total cost of Option 2 to $371,300.
• Option 3: 5-ft wide sidewalk on the south side of Graves Ave., aligned with
the existing sidewalk at Remax and eliminating the existing parking lane. This
option would also allow a mid-block pedestrian crossing and would total
$346,580.
Much discussion was had regarding the options presented. Comments provided to
Sanderson Stewart included:
• Chair Morris stated that for biking to be allowed, the trail must be wider and
stated that the 8-ft path would serve that purpose. She stated that, after
performing the walking audit, it seems as the whole street needs redone.
• Member Hanick shared her preference for the 8-ft trail on the north with no
parking anywhere on the north side. Manager Barr will investigate elimination of
the parking spaces on the north side. Morris agrees that it would be more
inclusive for cyclists.
• Dave Coulson suggested the potential for a raised pedestrian crossing for traffic
calming. Barr agreed with the suggestion and will discuss with the Town’s Streets
Division supervisor.
• Director Muhonen asked the consultant why options 2 and 3 do not provide for
multimodal use. Childress stated there is no physical room adding that there may
be a bit more room if on-street parking is eliminated. Manager Barr will research
other options and shared that the SRTS budget for Graves Ave. is approximately
$500K, with a local match of $125K.
• Member Slack shared his preference for utilizing the south side of Graves Ave.
stating that the kids use that side in their travels. Slack asked if Graves Ave. is
wide enough for parallel parking and Muhonen confirmed but recommended
measurements be taken.
• Chair Morris stated her preference for an 8-ft trail on both sides of Graves Ave.
stating multimodal needs. She suggested a study be performed on the usage of
on-street parking.
• Member Gamble stated there seem to be pros and cons either way. For the
south side, there are a number of conflicts with businesses and traffic exiting and
entering parking lots, but he agrees there should be continuity. Gamble is
attracted to the north side due to the option of the continuo us 8-ft path and fewer
conflicts with cross traffic.
• Member Moulton stated that pedestrians will generally use the path of least
resistance. The shortest route is the south side. He asked that the Town and
consultants keep those considerations in mind when planning for infrastructure.
Moulton also agrees that the 8-ft trail should be on both sides.
Manager Hook interjected to remind the members that the budget is not unlimited and to
be cautious, but that tweaks to the design may be possible. To add an 8-ft trail on both
sides would exceed the existing budget. Difficult decisions will need to be made based
on the funding we have available and the outcome that is desired. Easement costs on
south side are high. Unlike most roads, Graves Ave. is offset in in the Town’s right of
way. Additionally, the current schedule doesn’t have any allowance for easement work
Transportation Advisory Board – April 21, 2021 – Page 3
and its introduction would delay the project. If it determined the scope needs expanding,
it may have to be done in a phased approach.
• Trustee Bangs, being familiar with the area, stated it would be necessary to
engage the property owners in the area as there are employees that currently
use the on-street parking.
• Moulton stated that due to the large spacing on CO 7 between school zone
lights, some pulling into traffic aren’t aware of the school zone timing. Manager
Barr indicated that any changes along CO 7 would require involvement with
CDOT, but this may be included in a future SRTS grant application.
• Gamble stated that based on the discussions had, he would like to see an option
presented with the 8-ft multimodal trail being located on the south side.
Hook shared that this presentation was to gather input from the citizen advisory group
but informed the group that there will be another round of community outreach prior to
finalization of the design. Barr stated the concept designs will be posted to the project
website, contained in the press release, and posted at the school.
Muhonen stated that if the three options are provided to the public, let’s change the
options for consideration. As TAB stated, it is very important to accommodate both
cyclists and pedestrians for the full length on the south side. Muhonen also suggested
modification to one of the options to allow 8-ft trail on the south side while listing the
ramifications. Once the adjustments have been made, the Town will share with the
public. The next steps include a public virtual meeting which should occur within the
next couple weeks.
SIDEWALK/TRAIL INVENTORY TASK FORCE UPDATE (Chair, Belle Morris)
Morris shared that the task force completed the one-mile radius walking audit to
complete the SRTS paperwork. Morris thanked both Gamble and Street for all their
work on the task force. During the summer, the walking audit will expand to cover a two -
mile radius of the school.
PARKING & TRANSIT UPDATES (Parking & Transit Mgr. Vanessa Solesbee)
Transit: 2021 seasonal transit service is set to begin daily service on May 28. Other
service routes will begin July 1 and the Green Route will begin July 3. CDOT’s Bustang
will be starting soon and will continue through the annual ElkFest event.
Seasonal transit brochures will be distributed within the next couple weeks.
The Town’s second electric trolley is behind schedule for delivery due to the COVID-19
pandemic. The new trolley may not arrive until July. During the interim, a loaner gas-
powered trolley will be provided.
A Request for Proposal for the housing for two Town-owned electric trolleys has been
published. The mandatory pre-proposal meeting and optional site tour took place last
week. All proposals are due April 30, which will then be reviewed and the final selection
made. The total budget for this project is $376K (80% - FTA, 20% - Town).
Gamble identified the need for good transit information to be provided at the parking
structure. Solesbee has put much thought into this need and is collaborating with the
Parks Division. Slack recommended installing directional signage at the south side of
the east pedestrian bridge.
Parking: Solesbee provided a detailed overview to the Town Board last week. The
website is being kept up to date and the Town is actively performing outreach and
engagement. The technology implementation for paid parking began last week.
Muhonen or Hook will provide update on wayfinding during their portion of updates.
Solesbee and Eisenberg are working on supplemental signs to be contained within the
Transportation Advisory Board – April 21, 2021 – Page 4
parking areas or in CDOT right of way. Shared images with the group. The
supplemental signs will closely resemble those as part of the larger wayfinding project.
ENGINEERING UPDATES (Engineering Mgr. David Hook)
Manager Hook provided project updates since the last meeting.
Parking Wayfinding:
The successful bidder was awarded the project. The project is being split into phased
approaches. Phase 1 includes destination signs at parking lot entrances. Phase 2
includes directional signs within the CDOT right of way. Phase 1 is anticipated for
completion in May. Due to this being a pilot project, semi-permanent signs are being
installed. Feedback will be received on the signs being installed.
Town Development Reviews:
Elkhorn Lodge continuing with design process – closer to construction.
Alarado Traffic Signal: Delivery of the traffic signals is expected this week with plans to
install them next week. Completion of the traffic signal installation is anticipated for the
end of May.
The Stanley Film Center technical review will take place in May.
PROJECT / ADMINISTRATION UPDATES (Public Works Director Greg Muhonen)
Director Muhonen spoke on the Revitalizing Main Streets grant program extension for
larger projects and requested a letter of support, if the TAB members agree with the
proposal.
Public Works (PW) has met with CDOT and intends to apply for funds to make up the
US 36 & Community Dr. Roundabout funding shortfall. PW will also be requesting
added funds to expand the original project scope to include a multiuse trail. This trail
would connect to the Estes Lake trail as well as the sidewalk going to the school. The
school asked that this be expanded further to include the CTE building. The total
request will amount to $1.5M including all additions. The trail would be 10-ft wide with
delineation of surface colors for cyclists and pedestrians.
TAB unanimously approved Chair Morris create a letter of support for this endeavor.
Muhonen expressed thanks to Trustee Bangs for her efforts in changing the US 34
Corridor Study from a 5-year Strategic Goal to a 2021 Strategic Objective. The matter
will be discussed at the May 11 Town Board Study Session.
Muhonen met with the CDOT team regarding the needed overlay of US 34, as well as
US 36 from old Donut Haus property extending to the Rocky Mountain National Park
(RMNP) Beaver Meadows entrance. The US 36 portion was intended to occur in 2022
when the RMNP Fall River Access Station is closed for rehabilitation. The scheduling
decision continues as striping concerns and traffic congestion have been mentioned.
Chair Morris requested bike lanes be added along US 34. Input from the TAB will be
solicited this summer. Member Slack wanted to note that the existing topcoat on US 34
is nearly gone and has only worsened with the recent freeze and thaw.
OTHER BUSINESS (Chair, Belle Morris)
Morris extended her thanks to Member Hanick for her advocating for TAB and
encouraging others to apply for membership to the board in he r recent presentation to
the Estes Park Non-Profit Resource Center (EPNRC).
There being no further business, Chair Morris adjourned the meeting at 2:30 p.m.
Megan Van Hoozer, Recording Secretary
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa
Board of Trustees
Through: Town Administrator Lancaster
From: Robin Becker Planner I
Date: February 13, 2018
RE: Ordinance # 34-17 Proposed Text Amendment to Estes Valley
Development Code: EVDC §5.2 Accessory Uses, Table 5 -2
Accessory Uses permitted in the Non Residential Districts, §5.4
Temporary Uses and Structures: Ou tdoor Mobile Food Vending ,
§4.4 Nonresidential Zoning Districts, and Chapter 13 Definitions .
Objective:
UPDATE FEBRUARY 13TH 2018:
• Outdoor Mobile Food Vending Permit was changed to a use via a business
license only; there is now a single permit rather than two.
• Town Clerk Office will issue business licenses and regulate the approval of the
use, with routing and approval assistance from community development.
• Business License Fees will be lowered for a one year Outdoor Mobile Food
Vending Business License.
• Code amendment would only apply within Town of Estes Park and would not be
applicable in County, in order to interface smoothly with business licensing.
• Application process will be overseen by Town Clerk, which will remove it from the
detailed Land Use review needed in the Community Development Department
and provide a more streamlined process. Essentially it will allow the food trucks
to “float” as long as they have land owner signature approval and they are in the
allowed zone districts, CD, CO, I1, A, and CH and adhere to the Operational
Standards.
Review and Recommendation on proposed text amendments to the Estes Valley
Development Code (EVDC) regarding the inclusion of an Ou tdoor Mobile Food
Vending business license.
The objective of this proposed code amendment is to revise the EVDC to do the
following:
• Provide an opportunity for a current unsatisfied need in the Estes Valley for
Outdoor Mobile Food vendors to operate with a business license specific to the
use.
• Provide a clear interpretation of how and where this operation is allowed in
specific zoning districts in the Estes Valley Zoning Code.
• Update our plan to accommodate current mobile food vendor needs that are
economically beneficial to the Town and local business owners.
Present Situation:
Currently the process to regulate these outdoor mobile food vendors is through a
temporary use permit. It is common planning practice around the United States to
provide a more streamlined and activity specific business license.
This lack of applicable code and or license specific to this use due to the fact that
outdoor mobile food vendors were limited in existence and they have evolved in the
past ten to fifteen years. It is our time to adapt to meet the changing food requests and
needs of the population.
Proposal:
An outdoor mobile food vending business license would allow local and new
entrepreneurs to become invested and involved in the Estes Valley. These businesses
would also serve a need for alternative food options for businesses that find it cost
prohibitive to have a kitchen on site, i.e. distilleries, b reweries and beer gardens. The
one year business license would allow for flexibility with both the businesses being
served and the outdoor mobile food vendor. Furthermore by providing this business
license to local businesses and outdoor mobile food vendors we are allowing our
community to both have their cake and eat it too.
It is staff’s recommendation that including this ou tdoor mobile food vending business
license in the EVDC would meet a growing need for both new and local businesses
and locals and visitors alike. This is shown through our outreach with many current
mobile food vendors and local businesses. These include feedback and code
amendment contributions f rom Elkins Distilling Co, Lumpy Ridge Brewing Co, Rock
Cut Brewing Co, and Snowy Peaks Winery. Further feedback was provided from
Rations LLC, and Ladybug BBQ (food trucks operating in Town). We appreciate their
time and energy in the public outreach proce ss and hope to provide them the best with
this Code Amendment.
Amend EVDC section §5.2,Table 5-2, §5.4, §3-17, §4.4, and Chapter 13 Definitions,
as stated in Exhibit A [“TB Draft”], dated February 13, 2017, attached.
Advantages:
• Provides a specific business license for outdoor mobile food vendors instead of
attempting to add them to permits not applicable to their use; e.g., Temporary
Use Permits.
• Provides more food variety and options to locals, business owners and visitors.
• More organized structure and health and safety regulation for Outdoor Mobile
Food Vendors.
Disadvantages:
• Local restaurants may perceive a strain or more competition.
Action Recommended:
Review the amendment for compliance with Estes Valley Development Code (EVD C)
§3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for Review for a decision to approve, deny, or
approve with conditions.
Finance/Resource Impact:
N/A
Level of Public Interest
High: This issue has attracted the interest of local business and restaurant owners.
Low: This particular Code Amendment
Sample Motion:
APPROVAL
I move that the Town Board of Trustees approve Ordinance No. 34-17, amending the
Estes Valley Development Code as stated in Exhibit A, finding that the amendment is in
accord with the Comprehensive Plan and with Section 3.3 of the Development Code.
Attachments:
Ordinance #34-17 (OUTDOOR MOBILE FOOD VENDING BUSINESS LICENSE)
Exhibit A- (February 13th 2017)
5/12/2021 Town of Estes Park Mail - Food Truck Policy Development
Megan Van Hoozer <mvanhoozer@estes.org>
Food Truck Policy Development
19 messages
Vanessa Solesbee <vsolesbee@estes.org>Thu, May 6, 2021 at 9:14 AM
To: Belle Morris <BelleSMorris@hotmail.com>, Tom Street <tstreet5026@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Muhonen <gmuhonen@estes.org>, Megan Van Hoozer <mvanhoozer@estes.org>, David Hook
<dhook@estes.org>
Good Morning Belle & Tom,
I would like to respectfully request time on the agenda for the May TAB meeting.
In 2020, food truck parking was allowed on-street in public parking spaces under the "Embrace the Views" program.
Embrace the Views was designed to be a temporary vehicle through which normal Town processes could be expedited
and/or special arrangements made (e.g. like allowing food trucks and/or outdoor dining in public parking areas in the
CDOT right of way).
However, there is at least one business interested in continuing to have food trucks in downtown and while CDOT is
allowing continued temporary use of their right of way (in 90 day permit increments), I feel that the Town should consider
developing a more comprehensive (and longer-term) food truck policy. This has actually been on my radar for a while and
I was planning to tackle it later this year (or in 2022), however I don't think it is reasonable to ask the requesting business
owner to wait that long.
Believe it or not, food trucks can be quite controversial because brick and mortar restaurants can feel like they are unfair
competition. For example, the Town received a complaint from a downtown restaurant owner about the food truck that
used a public parking space (for only a few hours) for the Elkins fundraiser a few weeks ago.
With your permission, I would like to ask TAB at the May meeting if a few members would like to form an ad-hoc task
force to work on developing a food truck policy and process this summer. Do you two think this is an acceptable request
and/or role for TAB?
I have also reached out to the Chamber to see if they are interested in participating in the conversation as a key partner
as well.
Please feel free to email or call with questions and thank you very much for your consideration of this request.
Best,
Vanessa
--
Vanessa Solesbee, CAPP, CCTM
Parking & Transit Manager
Public Works Department
Town of Estes Park, CO
Phone: 970-577-3957
Web: estes.org/parking and estes.org/shuttles