The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES Town Board 1996-06-25Town of Estes Park,Larimer County,Colorado,up 5 ,19. Minutes of a .ReguJar...meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estee Park,Larimer County,Colorado.Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estee Park on the . .day of ju11e•• .,A.D.,19. at regular meeting hour. Robert L.Dekker Meeting called to order by Mayor Present:Mayor Robert L.Dekker Trustees:Susan L.Doylen,Mayor ProTem Jeff Barker, George J.Hix, William J.Marshall, Gary F.Klaphake,J.Donald Pauley Also Present:Town Administrator Gregory A.White, Town Attorney Vickie O’Connor, Town Clerk Absent:John Baudek,Trustee Mayor Dekker called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT. Ron Hildebrand,President/Alpine Anglers,commented on the proposed restoration of the Fall River Hydro Plant.In summary,his group opposes the restoration as they believe the cfs in the river is inadequate and seriously impacting the environment. Todd Hosman,2840 Fall River Rd.,also voiced his economic and environmental concerns with restoration of the Plant. Madeline Framson,Chairman/Colorado Mountain Club,read a letter dated September 1,1994 by Anne Vickery,Conservation Director/Colorado Mountain Club to the Federal Emergency Regulatory Commission (FERC)requesting FERC conduct an analysis of the proposed restoration and include a clear description of impacts to RNNP,measures to mitigate these impacts,and alternatives for supplying necessary electricity to the Town.These analyses have not been accomplished,FERC has no intention in doing so,and the Town should ensure that the impacts are studies and made public prior to taking any action. Austin Condon,provided the Clerk a copy of his letter dated June 24 to be distributed to the Town Board.In summary,Mr.Condon requested the Town initiate a new environmental analysis on the proposal,including updated information,consideration of the minimum flows,effects on downstream habitats and businesses,and affects on RNNP and visitors.The Trustees are being asked to approve the Light and Power Committee minutes,which includes a $2,500 expenditure on the Plant,and Mr.Condon urged this request be denied.Mr.Condon’s comments were also representing Trout Unlimited and Mark Peterson,Rocky Mountain Regional Director/National Parks and Conservation Association. Bill Van Horn disagreed with previous comments,stating that Plant restoration is not a major environmental issue. Mayor Dekker reported on the Plant’s history,reiterating that FERC has stated they have no jurisdiction and that the Town does have the right to pursue this project.However,economics and environmental issues will be the determining factors should the Town elect to proceed. Board of Trustees -June 25,1996 -Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR: 1.Town Board minutes dated June 11,1996. 2.Bills. 3.Committee Minutes: A.Light and Power,June 13,1996.PULLED B.Public Safety,June 20,1996. C,Planning Commission,June 18,1996 (acknowledgement only). The Light and Power Committee minutes were withdrawn from the consent calendar and voted upon separately.It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall)the consent calendar be approved,and it passed unanimously. 3.A.Light &Power Minutes.Staff clarified the following:the specific length of the river that could be affected is a one- mile stretch between the Power Plant and the diversion structure;while the Town appreciates those comments made earlier,the Town does have the legal right to fully restore the Plant to operational status;the $2,500 expenditure was requested to renovate the Plant building to possibly include demolition of the two remaining buildings (previously used for dwellings);and staff was authorized to negotiate with the rate consultant for a financial plan prior to proceeding further.Administrator Kiaphake reported that the renovation would be performed by a professional as the Town desires to restore the Plant building to its former architectural and historical significance.The Town is not seeking national historical designation.It was moved and seconded (Hix/Doylen)staff be authorized to expend $2,500 for building renovation,and to negotiate with the rate consultant to obtain a financial plan for presentation to the Committee,and it passed unanimously.Trustee Doylen noted that perhaps the Town Board should have a discussion to determine whether an eco-system analysis on that portion of the River that could be affected should be conducted in the near future. ACTION ITEMS: l.A.Light &Power Long Range System Plan -Acceptance of Report. Light &Power Director Matzke reported that Jerry Hager/Electrical Systems Consultants,presented the Plan at the Light &Power Committee meeting June 13.The basic purpose of the study is to predict the capital improvements which will be required during the next ten years to allow the Town an opportunity to plan for these expenditures. Considering the minimal amount of revenue from the Allenspark area (south line)and estimated expenditure,this portion of the Plan is of major concern.Administrator Kiaphake stated that the consultant should review this area again for potential alternatives and consequences of those alternatives. Noting that the Plan is a only a list of suggestions,and that a financial plan must first be prepared prior to proceeding, it was moved and seconded (Hix/Pauley)the Long Range System Plan lie accepted,and it passed unanimously. B.Bow Hunting Policy -Adoption of Revised Policy.Director Matzke reported that an Interim Bow Hunting Policy was approved in 1994.The Committee reviewed and recommended approval of a revised policy (further defined in the Committee minutes dated June 13,1996).Administrator Klaphake reported that area residents have expressed their public safety concerns by allowing hunting on this site.Discussion followed,and it was moved and seconded (Hix/Marshall)the Bow Board of Trustees -June 25,1996 -Page 3 Hunting Policy,as revised June 13,1996,be approved,and it passed unanimously. 2.A.“The Reserve”Annexation (Storer Ranch),James D’A.Welch, Martha W.Arnold.Elizabeth Welch Arrambide,Frances W. Hamper,Charles A.Welch,Cinda L.Smith and Gary F. Nordic/Applicants:Attorney White explained that a public hearing would be held on actual annexation itself and comments should be confined to annexation.The Zoning Ordinance will follow and those comments would then be appropriate. Mayor Dekker opened the public hearing.Community Development Director Stamey summarized the proposal for the 121.63-acre site located east of Stanley Heights.The Planning Commission favorably recommended approval of the annexation and it meets Town regulations. Those speaking in “favor”of the annexation:Bill Van Horn, Applicant’s representative,Austin Condon,Alan Aspinall,730 East Lane and Past President/North End Property Owners. There were no persons speaking in “opposition”,thus Mayor Dekker declared the public hearing closed.Attorney White read the Annexation Resolution,and thoroughly reviewed the Annexation Agreement.Attention was drawn to Paragraph 4 stating:“...intent and desire of Owner to develop the property in accordance with the density of units and uses approved by the Town pursuant to the Preliminary Plat for the property dated May 17,1996 and approved by the Planning Commission on May 21,1996,and that the approval by the Town of a final plat incorporating the density of the approved Preliminary Plat,which is approved in the Final Plat shall constitute a site specific development plan pursuant to C.R.S. 24—68—103,and said densities and uses shall vest for a period of three (3)years from the date of this Agreement.”Should the owner change his mind,he would not have an approved final plat.Mr.Van Horn confirmed that there are 43 developable single family sites,varying from 1.2 to over 3 acres and 2 old homestead tracts 7/8 acres in size.The owner’s intent was to develop as a mountain P.U.D.,while at the same time, attempting to address the north end property owners’concerns. An open area of over 37 acres is planned.Covenants are being submitted to the Planning Commission,and the only fences allowed will be on private patios,decorative style,and there will be no fences along the open space.CDOT permits have been approved.Attorney White confirmed that any deviation from the annexation plat would require the owner to return to the Town Board. Ralph Nicholas,1660 North Ridge Lane noted that additional residents have concerns on the annexation;however,they were unable to attend this meeting.There is no disagreement with Mr.Nordic as Mr.Nicholas believes he will adhere to his proposal;however,there are five property owners who must also sign the Annexation Agreement.Once annexation occurs, zoning must be designated within 30 days.It is irresponsible for the Town Board to approve the Annexation Agreement without proper signatures.Mr.Nordic does not have a firm contract. There being no further testimony,Attorney White read the Resolution.It was moved and seconded (Hix/Doylen)Resolution #12-96 be approved,and it passed unanimously. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall)the Annexation Agreement be approved as presented,contingent upon receipt of an executed Agreement,and it passed unanimously. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Barker)Ordinance #12-96 approving the annexation be approved,contingent upon receipt of an executed Agreement,and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees -June 25,1996 -Page 4 Zoning.Applicant’s representative,Bill Van Horn,noted the importance of the Annexation Agreement relative to zoning — the Town’s E—Estate zoning is the most restrictive,and this proposed development is even more restrictive,All of the use provisions that are part of the E—Estate zoning are appropriate,the only difference is the lot size.The owners desire to create a unique development in tune with a site specific plan.Alan Aspinall added that the developer has taken considerable steps to ensure overall appearance of the site relative to density. Douglas Floering,north end property owner,expressed his opposition to the annexation based upon elk habitat,There being no further testimony,Mayor Dekker declared the public hearing closed. Attorney White read the ordinance,and it was moved and seconded (Marshall/Pauley)Ordinance #13-96 be approved, subject to receipt of an executed Annexation Agreement,and it passed unanimously.Trustee Doylen commended Mr.Nordic for his sensitivity and vision on this proposal,and reiterated here concern to address affordable housing. 3.1995 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.Steve Jackson, CPA and Monte Vavra,Finance Officer,presented and reviewed the 1995 Annual Financial Report.Mr.Jackson noted that EPURA,the Housing Authority and Building Authority have now been integrated into the Report.The 1995 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was accepted by reference thereto. 4.Town Board Goal Setting Report —Presentation.Administrator Klaphake presented the 1996 Town Board Goal Setting Report which included the Vision and Mission Statements and the following Policy Agenda: 1.Revise and Approve the Comprehensive Plan (Study Committee Members include Mayor Dekker,Mayor ProTem Doylen,Larimer County Commissioner Disney). 2.Evaluate the Youth Center and Youth Activities. 3.Review Police Department Mission. 4.Approve and Implement Light &Power Master Plan. 5.Review Code Inspection Services and Make Appropriate Changes. 6.Monitor Parking and Transportation Plan. 7.Continue Joint Town/EPURA Budgeting Process, 8.Revise Community Outreach Program. 9.Consider Privatization of Town Services. 10.Review Use of Consultants/Sole Source. The 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program was also presented and reviewed. 5.Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority -Commissioner Appointment. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Doylen)Paula Laing Steige be appointed as Commissioner,filling the vacancy left by Randy Martin,5-year term,expiring September 15,1998,and it passed unanimously. 6.Town Administrator’s Report.None. Following completion of all agenda /ims,Mayor Dekker adjourned the meeting at 10:01 p.m. //1/,// obert L.Dekker,Mayor •i.%441 Vickie O’Connor,Town Clerk