HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS 1982RESOLUTION 69-82
WHEREAS,unforeseen conditions caused by the July 15,
1982 flood have developed within accounts in the General and
Light and Power Funds,and;
WHEREAS,said conditions will continue unless additional
funds are provided in the budget year 1982,and;
WHEREAS,the Federal and State disaster assistance funds
are adequate to fund the additional budget;
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees believes an emergency
exists which could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time
of the adoption of the budget for the year 1982.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees of
the Town of Estes Park,Colorado:
THAT the sum of $375,000 be expended from the General
Fund and $150,000 from the Light and Power Fund for the year 1982.
Dated this 14th day of December,1982.
ATTEST:
1 //
yt2
Clerk
Harry Mayor
Publish:December 17,1982
C
RESOLUTION 68-82
WHEREAS,the exposure of municipalities in Colorado and through
out the country to federal antitrust lawsuits has been greatly
expanded as a result of recent decisions of the United States
Supreme Court;
WHEREAS,the potential for treble damage awards and the sub
stantial expense of defending antitrust litigation,even if success
ful,may inhibit municipalities from enacting or enforcing regulations
which are intended to protect the public health,safety and welfare,
but which also may be deemed to restrict competition;
WHEREAS,at least four Colorado municipalities already have
been sued under the federal antitrust laws for various regulatory
activities,with claimed damages,when trebled,exceeding $100
million;
WHEREAS,the cost to the taxpayers of one Colorado municipality
in defending one of these lawsuits,which was settled prior to
trial,exceeded $250,000;
WHEREAS,municipalities differ from private enterprise in
that private enterprise is not charged with protecting the public
health,safety and welfare;
WHEREAS,numerous protections from municipal regulations,
other than treble damages under the federal antitrust laws,are
available such as,public notice,public hearing,public meeting
and public record requirements,court review of actions,periodic
elections and the rights of initiated referendum and recall,and
the continuing authority of the state General Assembly or the
people of Colorado to modify the statutory and constitutional
authority of Colorado’s municipalities;
WHEREAS,state legislation does not provide any certain solution
to the problem and years of litigation will be necessary to decide
whether any state legislation meets the test established by the
U.S.Supreme Court for local government antitrust immunity;
WHEREAS,federal legislation can address the problem directly
by seeking a specific exemption from the federal antitrust laws
for local governments and all or some of their activities;
C
WHEREAS,federal legislation could eliminate damages from
the antitrust remedies available against local governments and
their taxpayers;and
WHEREAS,local governments should not be imperiled when en
gaging in traditional local government regulatory activities such
as zoning,enacting and enforcing building and fire codes,regu—
lating the use of public rights-of—way,licensing,franchising
and the myriad of other regulatory activities traditionally engaged
in by local governments;
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK that
the Congress of the United States should act as quickly as possible
to provide appropriate exemptions for municipalities from federal
antitrust liability.
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
By_______________________
.Z Mayor
ATTEST:
Townlerk
LiORESOLUTION67-82BEITRESOLVEDbytheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkthatthefollowingwageandsalaryincreasesbeplacedintoeffectonJanuary1,1983:FinanceDepartmentandClerical6.8%PoliceDepartment7.2%PublicWorks,LightandPower,andWaterDepartments6.1%ProfessionalAdministration7.0%
C
RESOLUTION 66-82
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSED STATE
LEGISLATION FOR CIVIL REMEDIES BY UTILITIES FOR
DIVERSION OF UTILITY SERVICES.
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park owns and operates a municipal
utility for the provision of electric service;and,
WHEREAS,it is becoming more and more apparent that incidences
of diversion of such utility services by means of bypassing,tampering
and unauthorized metering account for a substantial loss of such
services without remuneration to the Town;and,
WHEREAS,such losses result in increased costs to other ratepayers;
and,
WHEREAS,the Colorado General Assembly will be considering pro
posed legislative changes to specifically provide for certain civil
remedies,including treble damages in certain cases,in order to
facilitate collection of damages from persons responsible for such
diversions;and,
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park desires to endorse efforts in
pursuit of such legislative changes.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
TOWN OF ESTES PARK:
That Estes Park hereby endorses the efforts in pursuit of
legislative changes to provide certain civil remedies,including
treble damages in certain cases,in order to facilitate collection
of damages from persons responsible for losses of revenue to utilities
through diversion of utility services by means of bypassing,tampering
and unauthorized metering.
Dated at Estes Park,Colorado,this 9th day of November,1982.
;;;3
Harry B.T egent,Mayor
ATTEST:
4
Ann E.Jens ,Town Clerk
Q C
RESOLUTION 65-82
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park owns and operates a municipal
electric utility;and
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park is a member in good standing of
the Colorado Association of Municipal Utilities (Association”);and
WHEREAS,the purposes of the Association include promoting the
interests of its municipal electric utility members,providing services
to its members and consumers in the management,operation,adminis
tration,improvement and extension of electric utility services,and
assisting in the enactment of legislation beneficial to and in the
interest of municipally-owned utilities within the State of Colorado;
and
WHEREAS,some members of the Association are subject to the partial
regulation and jurisdiction of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission
insofar as,and to the extent that,they provide electric utility service
outside the corporate boundaries of their respective municipalities;and
WHEREAS,the Association is considering proposing certain legis
lative changes to the General Assembly which will result in the return
of control over the rates and service of municipally—owned electric
and gas utilities to officials of the affected or potentially affected
municipalities;and
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park wishes to endorse the efforts of
the Association and its representatives in pursuing such legislative
changes.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees of the
Town of Estes Park,as follows:
The Town of Estes Park hereby endorses the efforts of
the Colorado Association of Municipal Utilities,of which
it is a member,in proposing and seeking changes in existing
Colorado law which will result in the return of control over
the rates and service of municipally-owned electric and gas
utilities to the appropriate municipal officials.
ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the Town of Estes Park,this
9th day of November,1982.
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
By___________
Mayor
ATTES/
Town Clerk
/
C
RESOLUTION 64-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and any other appropriate Town Official or
employee is authorized to execute any documents necessary to complete
the funding for a Community Development Plan through the State of
Colorado Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG).
Adopted:October 26,1982
9
RESOLUTION 63-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and any other appropriate Town Official or
employee is authorized to execute any documents necessary to
complete the funding for the thirteen replacement bridges through
the Housing and Urban Development tHUD)Grant.
Adopted:October 26,1982
C,62—82RESOLUTIONTOAPPROPRIATESUMSOFMONEYARESOLUTIONAPPROPRIATINGSUMSOFMONEYTOTHEVARIOUSFUNDSANDSPENDINGAGENCIES,INTHEAMOUNTSANDFORTHEPURPOSESASSETFORTHBELOW,FORTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,FORTHE1983BUDGETYEAR.WHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteeshasadoptedtheannualbudgetinaccordancewiththeLocalGovernmentBudgetLawonOctober12,1982,and;WHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteeshasmadeprovisionthereinforrevenuesinanamountequaltoorgreaterthanthetotalproposedexpendituresasset.forthinsaidbudget,and;WHEREAS,itisnotonlyrequiredbylaw,butalsonecessarytoappropriatetherevenuesprovidedinthebudgettoandforthepurposesdescribedbelow,soasnottoimpairtheoperationsoftheTown.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:THATthefollowingsumsareherebyappropriatedfromtherevenueofeachfund,toeachfund,forthepurposesstated:GeneralFundCurrentOperatingExpenses$1,790,235CapitalOutlay1,840,140TOTALGENERALFUND$3,630,375Light&PowerFundCurrentOperatingExpenses$3,871,909CapitalOutlay1,038,200TOTALLIGHT&POWERFUND$4,910,109WaterFundCurrentOperatingExpenses$588,316CapitalOutlay342,000TOTALWATERFUND$930,316—7—
LibraryFundCurrentOperatingExpensesCapitalOutlayTOTALLIBRARYFUNDGeneralRevenueSharingFundCurrentOperatingExpensesCapitalOutlayTOTALREVENUESHARINGFUNDConservationTrustFundStanleyParkFundSelfInsuranceFundPolicemen’sPensionFundFiremen’sPensionFundTOTALI4MayorC0$118,7493,500$122,249$10,65045,350$56,000$13,565$339,157$204,509$22,000$32,300$10,260,580ADOPTEDTHIS12thdayofOctober,1982.ATTEST:.—8—
CC61—82RESOLUTIONTOSETMILLLEVIESARESOLUTIONLEVYINGGENERALPROPERTYTAXESFORTHEYEAR1983,TOHELPDEFRAYTHECOSTSOFGOvERNMENT’FORTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADOFORTHE1983BUDGETYEAR.WHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkhasadoptedtheannualbudgetinaccordancewiththelocalGovernmentBudgetLawonOctober12,1982,and;WHEREAS,theamountofmoneynecessarytobalancethebudgetforgeneraloperatingexpensesis$83,000and;WHEREAS,the1983valuationforassessmentfortheTownofEstesParkascertifiedbytheCountyAssessoris$22,520,720.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:THATforthepurposeofmeetingallgeneraloperatingexpensesoftheTownofEstesParkduringthe1983budgetyear,thereisherebyleviedataxof3.7millsuponeachdollarofthetotalvaluationforassessmentofalltaxablepropertywithintheTownfortheyear1983.THATtheTownClerkisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoimmediatelycertifytotheCountyCommissionersofLarimerCounty,Colorado,themillleviesfortheTownofEstesParkashereinabovedeterminedandset.ADOPTEDthis12thdayofOctober,1982.\0QOOGOJz7/MayorATTEST:/—6—
0060—82RESOLUTIONTOADOPTBUDGETARESOLUTIONSUMMARIZINGEXPENDITURESANDREVENUEFOREACHFUND,ANDADOPTINGABUDGETFORTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,FORTHECALENDARYEARBEGINNINGONTHE1STDAYOFJANUARY,1983,ANDENDINGONTHELASTDAYOFDECEMBER,1983.WHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkhasappointedDaleG.Hill,TownAdministrator,toprepareandsubmitaproposedbudgettosaidgoverningbodyatthepropertime,and;WHEREAS,DaleG.Hill,TownAdministrator,hassubmittedaproposedbudgettothisgoverningbodyonSeptember14,1982,foritsconsideration,and;WHEREAS,upondueandpropernotice,publishedinaccordancewiththelaw,saidproposedbudgetwasopenforinspectionbythepublicatadesignatedplace,apublichearingwasheldonOctober12,1982,andinterestedtaxpayersweregiventheopportunitytofileorregisteranyobjectionstosaidproposedbudget,and;WHEREAS,whateverincreasesmayhavebeenmadeintheexpenditures,likeincreaseswereaddedtotherevenuessothatthebudgetremainsinbalance,asrequiredbylaw.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO:Section1.Thatestimatedexpendituresforeachfundareasfollows:GeneralFund$3,630,375Light&PowerFund4,910,109WaterFund930,316PublicLibrary122,249GeneralRevenueSharing56,000Policemen’sPensionFund22,000Firemen’sPensionFund32,300SelfInsuranceFund204,509ConservationTrustFund13,565StanleyParkFund339,157$10,260,580—3—
0Section2.ThattheestimatedresourcesforeachGeneralFundFromunapprooriatedsurplusesFromsourcesotherthangeneralpropertytaxFromthegeneralpropertytaxlevyLight&PowerFundFromunappropriatedfundsFromotherrevenuesourcesTOTALLIGHT&POWERFUNDWaterFundFromunappropriatedfundsFromotherrevenuesourcesTOTALWATERFUND$998,8804,545,960$5,544,840$653,637671,835$1,325,472PublicLibraryGeneralRevenueSharingConservationTrustFundStanleyParkFundSelfInsuranceFundPolicemen’sPensionFundFiremen’sPensionFundTOTAL$122,250$56,056$13,565$339,157$204,509$321,368$178,092$12,013,894Cfundareasfollows:$914,0752,911,51083,000$3,908,585TOTALGENERALFUND—4—
00Section3.Thatthebudget,assubmitted,amended,andhereinabovesummarizedbyfund,beandthesameherebyisapprovedandadoptedasthebudgetoftheTownofEstesPark,Colorado,fortheyearstatedabove.Section4.ThatthebudgetherebyapprovedandadoptedshallbesignedbytheMayorandTownClerkandmadeapartofthepublicrecordsoftheTown.ADOPTEDthis12thdayofOctober,1982.TownkATTEST:—5—
C
RESOLUTION 59-82
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park has become involved in claims
and litigation relative to flooding caused by the breaking of Lawn
Lake Reservoir on or about July 15,1982;and
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park has sustained loss and
damages as a result of said incident which may make it necessary
and advisable for the Town of Estes Park to make claims against
the appropriate persons or entities responsible;and
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park is being represented in
defense of claims made against it by attorneys for the insurance
carriers for the Town of Estes Park,but that there may be matters
arising in such litigation affecting the interests of the Town of
Estes Park which may not be the concern of the insurance carrier
for the Town of Estes Park;and
WHEREAS,the Town Attorney for the Town of Estes Park is not
in a position to represent the Town in the foregoing matters
because of certain conflicts of interest arising from the repre
sentation of other persons or entities who may be involved in an
adversary position to the Town;and
WHEREAS,the Town Board of the Town of Estes Park believes it
necessary and advisable to have independent legal counsel to
represent it in the foregoing matters;
NOW,THEREFORE,THESE PRESENTS WITNESSETH THAT the Town Board
of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,hereby employs the law firm
of Harden,Schmidt &Hass,a Professional Corporation,to repre
sent it in the following particulars:
(1)To advise concerning the appropriate and proper proce
dure in pending cases and claims against the Town of Estes Park to
the extent that said matters are not covered by representation
through the insurance carrier of the Town.
(2)To advise concerning the undertaking of claims,
counter—claims,cross—claims or third—party claims either in
initiating new claims or in pending claims against the Town of
Estes Park.
(3)To advise concerning other and further legal matters in
these connections as requested by the Town Administrator.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no claims will be intitiated or
undertaken by said firm without the prior approval of the Town
Administrator.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the attorneys and paralegals in
the firm of Harden,Schmidt &Hass,a Professional Corporation,
shall undertake the legal services mentioned herein at their
present and usual hourly rates,together with reimbursement for
reasonable and necessary expenses incurred.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THISd day of September,1982.
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
2I /
By•2///’
Mayor
Town Clerk7
(SEAL)
n C
58—82
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,a special meeting of the shareholders of the Estes
Park Golf and Country Club will be held at the Municipal Building
in Estes Park on Thursday,September 30,1982,for the purpose of
presenting to the stockholders the question of whether or not the
Estes Park Golf and Country Club should elect to be governed by
the provisions of Articles 20 through 29,Title 7,C.R.S.,1973,
as amended,known as the Colorado Non Profit Corporation Act,and;
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park is a shareholder in the Estes
Park Golf and Country Club.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized
to vote the shares of stock owned by the Town of Estes Park at the
shareholders meeting on September 30,1982.
Adopted:September 28,1982
0
RESOLUTION 56-82
FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION
OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,COLORADO
CONCERNING A PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF AN
URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY IN THE TOWN
Heretofore,a Petition signed by more than 25 registered
electors in the Town was duly filed with the Town Clerk setting
forth that there is a need for an Urban Renewal Authority to func
tion in the Town of Estes Park.Pursuant to C.R.S.1973,Section
31-25-104(1)(a),the Town Clerk gave notice by publication that
a public hearing would be conducted by the Board of Trustees of
the Town on this date in order to determine a need of such an
Authority in the Town.Such hearing has been held and the Board
of Trustees has heard the evidence presented by all parties who
desired to be heard concerning the need for an Urban Renewal
Authority in the Town of Estes Park.The Board of Trustees,being
thus advised,now finds and declares as follows:
1.That blighted areas do exist in the Town.This
finding is based in part,but not limited to the fact that
there is need of redevelopment and/or rehabilitation in the Town
as a result of a flood of Fall River in the Town on July 15,
1922,and the Governor of the State of Colorado has certified the
need for disaster assistance under Federal Law on account of
such flood;
2.That the acquisition,clearance,rehabilitation,con
servation,development or redevelopment or a combination thereof
of such blighted areas is necessary in the interest of the public
health,safety,morals or welfare of the residents of the Town
of Estes Park;and
3.That it is in the public interest that an Urban
Renewal Authority for the Town of Estes Park be created and that
such authority exercise the powers provided to be exercised by
such an authority in Part 1,Article 25,Title 31,C.R.S.1973,
as amended.
RESOLUTION 57-82
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK
ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ESTABLISHING AN
URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK:
1.That the foregoing findings of the Board of Trustees
are hereby adopted.
2.That there is hereby established an Urban Renewal
Authority in the Town of Estes Park pursuant to Part 1,Article 25,
Title 31,C.R.S.1973,as amended,to be known as the Estes Park
Urban Renewal Authority.
3.That the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park
is hereby designated as the Urban Renewal Authority of the Town
of Estes Park as provided in Section 31—25—115,C.R.S.1973,
as amended.
Passed and adopted this /4/day of ,1982.
ATTE
Town Cc
C)a
RESOLUTION 55-82
WHEREAS,a regular meeting of the shareholders of the Estes
Park Golf and Country Club will be held at the Municipal Building
in Estes Park on Monday,the 13th day of September,1982,for the
purpose of electing a Board of Directors and the transaction of
such other business as may come before the meeting,and;
WHEREAS,the Town of Estes Park is a shareholder in the
Estes Park Golf and Country Club.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized
to vote the share of stock owned by the Town of Estes Park at the
shareholders meeting on September 13,1922.
Adopted:August 24,1982
0RESOLUTION54-82WHEREAS,theTownofEstesPark,Colorado,isauthorizedandenpoweredbytheprovisionsoftheCountyandMunicipalityDevelopmentRevenueBondAct(29-3-101etseq.),C.R.S.1973,asamended,hereinafterreferredtoas“theAct”,tofinanceaproject,asthattermisdefinedintheAct,andtoissueitsindustrialrevenuebondsforthepurposeofusingtheproceedstherefromtofinancetheproject;andWhereas,theStanleySteamerHotel/Resort,Ltd.,hereinafterreferredtoas“theApplicant”,hasrequestedtheTowntoissueandsellitsindustrialrevenuebondspursuanttotheprovisionsoftheActforthepurposeoffinancingacommercialenterpriseconstitutingaproject,asthattermisdefinedintheAct,pursuanttotheapplicationfiledbytheApplicant;andWHEREAS,thefinancingoftheprojectoftheApplicant,namelythesaleoflimitedpartnershipinterestspursuanttotheConfidentialMemorandumfiledasapartoftheapplication,requiresaperiodoftimeforthemarketingofsaidlimitedpartnershipunits;andWHEREAS,therehasnotbeenfiledwiththeapplicationamarketingplanforthesaleoftheindustrialrevenuebondissuebecausesaidmarketingplanwillnotbeavailableuntilthesaleofthelimitedpartnershipunits;andWHEREAS,theissuanceoftheTown’sindustrialrevenuebondsforthefinancingoftheprojectiscontingentuponApplicantsatisfactorilycompletingthesaleofthelimitedpartnershipunitssetforthintheConfidentialMemorandumandthefilingofanadequatemarkingplanwiththeTownforthesaleoftheindustrialrevenuebondissue;andWHEREAS,theTownwishestodeclareitsintentiontoauthorizeanissueofitsindustrialrevenuebondsfprthepurposeoffinancingtheproject,asmorefullysetforthintheapplicationfiledbytheApplicant;intheamountrequestedbytheApplicantanduponsuchtermsandconditionsasmaythenbeagreeduponbytheTownandtheApplicant.NOW,THEREFORE,itisresolvedbytheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesPark,Colorado,thattheTownherebydeclaresitsintentiontoauthorizetheissuanceandsaleofaseriesofindustrialrevenuebondsoftheTownunderandinaccordancewith
CtheprovisionsoftheAct,intheamountrequestedbytheApplicantpresentlyestimatedtobe$9,750,000.00;anduponthetermsandconditions,asmaybemutuallyagreeduponbytheTownandtheApplicant.Provided,however,thatpriortotheissuanceandsaleofsaidindustrialrevenuebondstheApplicantcompletethesaleofthelimitedpartnershipunitsinaccordancewiththeConfidentialIemorandumfiledwiththeapplication;thattheApplicantassuretheTown,itsattorneysandbondcounselthattheissuanceoftheindustrialrevenuebondsisinaccordancewithallapplicableFederalandStaterestrictionsandregulationsinforceatthetimeofsaidissuance;thattheApplicantfileamarketingplansignedbyanentityacceptabletotheTownforthesaleofthebonds;andthatthesestatedconditionsbecompletedwithinareasonableperiodoftimefromthedateofthisResolution.BEITFURTHERRESOLVEDthattheactualissuanceandsaleof•suchbondsmustbeauthorizedbytheTownatameetingtobeheldforsaidpurposefollowingcompletionoftheabovestatedconditions.PASSEDANDAPPROVEDthisKday,1982.Mayor)/—Town—2—
CCRES01UTI0N53-82BEITRESOLVEDbytheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkthattheMayorandTownClerkareauthorizedtoexecutethecontractwithPaulH.andMarie1.WestforthepurchaseoftheirpropertyonWestRiversideDriveandtoclosethetransactionasnecessary.Datedthis/Cddayof__________________,1982.%ZHarryB.Tryent,MaSrorATTEST:
0
RESOLUTION 52-82
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees has determined that a
sidewalk,curb and gutter be constructed along the entire
frontage of 205 Virginia Drive;and
WHEREAS,pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-15-703(2),
C.R.S.1973,as amended,the Board hereby proposes to order the
construction of said sidewalk,curb and gutter to be done by the
owners of the adjacent property;and
WHEREAS,in the event that any owner does not construct
said sidewalk,curb and gutter after notice to said owner,the
Board has determined that the Town shall construct the same,
and assess the costs thereof against the property owner;and
WHEREAS,in the event of said assessment it shall be
collected pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-15-401 (1)(d)
and 31-15—704,C.R.S.1973,as amended;
HOW,THEREFORE,be it resolved by the Board of Trustees of
the Town of Estes Park that:
1.The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park hereby
determines that it is necessary that a sidewalk,curb and gutter
be constructed along the entire frontage of 205 Virginia Drive.
2.The Board of Trustees hereby instructs the Town Clerk
to give notice to the property owners to construct said sidewalk,
curb and gutter.
3.The Board of Trustees hereby finds that in the event
the property owner does not construct said sidewalk,curb and
gutter within 60 days of the sending of said notice that the
appropriate officials of the Town of Estes Park are hereby
empowered to construct said sidewalk,curb and gutter and that
following said construction,the costs shall be assessed against
the property owner adjacent to the construction of said sidewalk,
curb and gutter.
APPROVED:
ayo r
ATTEST:
/77
To)m Clerk
1
0’C
NOT ICE
TO:Mr.Greig Steiner
The Courtyard
205 Virginia Drive
P.0.Box 3081
Estes Park,Colorado 80517
By Resolution No.52-82 adopted by the Board of Trustees
of the Town of Estes Park on July 27,1982,a copy of which
is attached hereto and incorporated in this Notice by reference,
the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined
that a sidewalk,curb and gutter be constructed along the entire
frontage of 205 Virginia Drive.The Records of the Clerk and
Recorder of Larimer County,Colorado,show that you are the
owner of the following described real property:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 16,Block 10,
Town of Estes Park,Larimer County,Colorado,as shown
on the second amended plat thereof and as monumented by
a Town of Estes Park brass capped monument bearing N25
21’27”E.a distance of 734.00 feet from the W 1/16th
corner of NE1/4 of Section 25,Township 5 North,Range
73 West of the 6th P.M.,as monumented by a Town of
Estes Park brass capped monument (all bearings contained
herein are relative to the West line of the SW1/4 of the
NE1/4 of said Section 25,considered as bearing 5 00 14’
15”E);thence N 88 51’52”W 20.0 feet along the North
line of Lot 19,Block 10,Town of Estes Park to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING:thence N 54 15’56”E 50.00 feet;
thence S 88 5l’52”E 118.19 feet to a point on the
Westerly ROW of Virginia Drive;thence Southerly along
the ROW of Virginia Drive on a curve to the right having
a central angle of 27 42’53”and radius of 250.00 feet
for a distance of 120.93 feet,the resultant chord being
S 08 06’03”W 119.75 feet;thence S 01 27’E 101.70 feet
along the ROW of Virginia Drive;thence N 89 14’52”W
128.30 feet to the West line of Lot 18,Block 10;thence
N 00 45’08”E 91.33 feet along the West line of said Lot
18 thence N 88 51’52”W 25.0 feet;thence N 00 45’08”E
100 0 feet to the North line of Lot 19,Block 10;thence
S 88 51’52”E 6.32 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
Larimer County,Colorado.
Also known as street and number:205 Virginia Drive,
Estes Park,Colorado.
You are further advised that your property lies adjacent to
the western portion of Virginia Drive where said sidewalk,curb
and gutter is to be constructed.You are further advised that
said construction must be completed within Sixty Days (60)days
of the date of this Notice.In the event that said construction
is not completed within said period,the Town of Estes Park
will complete said construction and assess the same to you.
You are also notified that plans and specifications for
said sidewalk,curb and gutter may be obtained from the Public
Works Administrator of the Town of Estes Park at the hours
between 8:00 A.M.and 4:00 P.M.,Monday thru Friday at the
Municipal Building,Estes Park,Colorado.
DATED:July 29 ,l982.
To’C 1 e r k
C
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 51-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That in compliance with Section 3.05.040 (2)of the
Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,the
percentage of rental payments to be refunded to the elderly
citizens shall be .455 (.455%)of the rental payments made
during 1981.
Adopted:July 27,1982
Formulas for tax refunds to the elderly -1982:
Property Owners:.00325 X assessed valuation =refund
Rentors:(Established by Resolution by the Board of
Trustees according to Section 3.05.040)
(Owner).003 =.00325 x =00455(Rentor).0042 X
(1981)(1982)
00RESOLUTION50-82OFTHEBOARDOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARKADOPTINGINDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENTREVENUEBONDPOLICIESANDGUIDELINESWHEREAS,theBoardofTrusteeshavereviewedvariouspoliciesandguidelinesinconjunctionwiththeTownissuingIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds;andWHEREAS,theTownofEstesParkiscommittedtoindustrialdevelopmentinandaroundtheTowncoupledwithsoundfinancialplanninganddirection;andWHEREAS,thesepoliciesandguidelinesfromthebasisforvariousdecisionsaffectingtheissuanceofIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds;andWHEREAS,BoardofTrusteeswishestoformallyadopttheseIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBondPoliciesandGuidelines.NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARKthatthefollowingIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBondPoliciesandGuidelinesbe,andthesameherebyareadopted:I.Policy:A.General.TheTownofEstesParkdesirestomaintainareasonablelevelofeconomicgrowthanddevelopmentintheTownandwithintheboundariesofitsUrbanGrowthArea.Tothisend,oneprincipalmechanismforimplementingpositivegovernmentactioninconcertwiththe
00privatesectoristheuseofIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds(IDRB)pursuanttoCountyandMunicipalityDevelopmentRevenueBondAct,Title29,Article3oftheColoradoRevisedStatutes.B.EndorsementoftheUseofIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds.TheTownofEstesParkendorsestheconceptofpositivelocalgovernmentalactiontostimulatebalancedeconomicdevelopmentinclosecooperationwithprivateinstitutions.ThiswillincludethediscriminateuseofIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBondsasonemeansavailabletotheTownofEstesParktoachievethesepurposes.C.EconomicCompetition.ItisnottheintentoftheTownofEstesPark,throughtheimplementationofthispolicy,toprovideaneconomicallycompetitiveadvantagetoanyentitywhethertheirpurposeforexistencebeforprofitornon—profit.II.Guidelines:A.General.Guidelinessetforthhereinarenotintendedasminimumrequirements,andeachapplicationwillbeconsideredonitsindividualmerits.B.BenefitstotheTown.Generally,anIDRBproposalshoulddemonstrateoneormoreofthefollowingeconomicbenefitstotheTown.1.CreationofadditionaljobswithinEstesParkandwithintheboundariesofitsUrbanGrowthArea.—2—
0G2.IncreaseoftaxbaseresultinginanetfiscalbenefittotheTown.3.Stimulationofadditionalbusinessinvestment.4.ProvidefacilitiesorbenefitstoEstesParkcitizensforeconomicpurposesinamannerthatcomplimentstheTown’sownprogramsorfacilities.C.OtherConsiderations.TheTownwillencouragethesubmissionofproposalsthatareconsistentwiththefollowinggeneralguidelines.1.IDRBproposalsshouldbeconsistentwithstatedofficialpoliciesandgoalsandobjectivesoftheTownofEstesPark.ItistheresponsibilityoftheapplicanttoobtainsuchinformationfromtheTownadministration.2.TheTownofEstesParkwillencouragethesubmissionofproposalsthatprovidefordowntownrevitalization,andenergyconservation.D.FacilitiesandPrograms.AllfacilitiesandprogramsthatmaybefinancedundertheColoradostatuteswillbeeligibleforconsiderationbytheTown.CompetitiveimpactresultingfromthefacilityorprogramwillbeconsideredandaddressedinapprovinganIDRBissue.—3—
CIII.FinancialResponsibility:ApplicantsforIDRBissuesmustclearlydemonstratefinancialresponsibilitysufficienttoamortizetheproposedbondissue.TheplanformarketingtheIDRB’swilldeterminethegeneralfinancialstandardsusedbytheTowntoevaluatetheproposal.ThemarketingplanforsaleoftheIDRBissuemustbefiledwiththeapplicationandkeptcurrentthroughtheclosingoftheIDRBissue.A.PublicOfferingofIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds.ThefollowingfinancialcriteriawillbeusedasguidelinesfortheparticipationoftheTowninapublicofferingofIDRB’s:1.Thefinancialstatementsoftheapplicantshoulddemonstratesoundfinancialpositionandoperatingresults.2.Andfurther,thattheapplicantshouldpresentfinancialprojectionsoftheproposedprojectbasedonamarketingsurveyorafeasibilitystudy,whereapplicable.3.PrivatePlacement.1.Descriptionofprivateplacementinvestor(s)2.Thedebttoappraisedvalueoftheproposedfacilityshouldnotexceed90%.Exceptionstothisguidelineshouldbeallowedwheretheapplicantpresentsspecialcircumstancesforahigherdebttoappraisedvalueratio.—4—
C.OtherGeneralEconomicConsiderations.1.Assetlifespanversustermofthebondissue.2.Managementstrengthofapplicant.3.Minimumsizeofbondissues.Generally,theTownwillnotconsideranIDRBissueoflessthan$750,000unlessprivateplacementhasbeenpre—arranged.4.Effortstowardpublic/privatepartnershipprojects.D.ReimbursementtotheTownofallexpenses.WhetherornottheproposedprojectisapprovedbytheTownofEstesParkandIndustrialRevenueBondsissued,theproponentoftheprojectwillberequiredtoreimbursetheTownofEstesParkforanyandall,expensesincurredasaresultoftheapplicationforIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds.Thisreimbursementwillinclude,butnotbelimitedto,thecostoftimeofallthepersonneloftheTown,theexpenseofbondcounselandsuchconsultantsastheTownmayemploytoassistintheevaluation,andallotherexpensesincurredbytheTownrelatedtotheproposal.E.FeeschargedbytheTownfortheIssuanceofIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBonds.IftheproposedprojectisapprovedbytheTownofEstesParkandIndustrialDevelopmentRevenueBondsareissued,afeewillbepaidtotheTownbytheapplicant.The—5—
00amountofsaidfeeshallbethepresentvalueoftheamounttobederivedfromapplying1/16of1%totheunpaidprincipalamountofthebondsattheendofeachbondyear.ThisfeewillbeinadditiontothereimbursementofanyandallexpensesincurredbytheTown.Notwithstandinganyprovisioncontainedherein,thisfeeshallnotexceedfederalarbitrageregulations.ThefeewillbepaidtotheTownatthetimeofofficialclosingonthesaleofthebonds.F.MoniesCollected.ThemoniescollectedasaresultoftheprovisionsofSectionIII,paragraphsDandFabovearetobeusedfortheencouragementofeconomicdevelopmentwithintheTownlimitsoftheTownofEstesParkandincludinganyotherareaallowableunderapplicablelawsandregulations.PassedandadoptedataregularmeetingoftheBoydofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkthis________dayoffI/à’Mayor—6—
C0IDR3ADMINISTRATIVEPROCEDURESStep1ApplicationreceivedbyTownClerkwith$1,000deposit.•3copiesofallmaterialsreceivedbyTownClerk•Applicationmustcontainsufficientinformationtoallowreviewoftheprojectincludingallnecessaryfinancialinformation.•BackupmaterialforproposalStep2CopiesofapplicationandproposaldistributedtoLegal,Planning,andFinanceforreviewandcomment.Asapartofstaffreviewtheapplicationandproposalmaybesubmittedtoanindependentfinancialadvisorandbondcounselforreview.Step3Staffreviewmeeting•Staffreviewwillrequire2to3weeks.Eachdepartmentreviewingtheproposalwillsubmitwrittencomments.Ifadditionalinformationisneeded,asecondmeetingwillbescheduledforreviewandcommentaftercontactismadewiththeapplicanttoanswerquestions.Recommendationisformalizedbystaff.
GStep4RecommendationandwrittencommentsareforwardedtotheTownClerkforreviewandschedulingonTownBoardagendaandforwardedtoapplicant.TownBoardmeetingsareheldthe2ndand4thTuesdaysofeachmonth.ThestaffreviewprocessmustbecompletedoneweekbeforetheBoardofTrusteesmeeting.Step5ApplicantisnotifiedofthedatetheapplicationwillappearonBoardagendaandarefundofanyexcessdepositorabillforadditionalreimbursementofcostissenttoapplicant.Costswillincludeanindependentfiscalagentandbondcounsel(tobeselectedbytheTown)toreviewauditedfinancialstatementsandtheproposaloftheapplicant.PaymentofadditionalcostmustbereceivedbytheDirectorofFinancepriortothescheduledBoardmeeting.Step6BoardapprovesordeniesinducementresolutionatscheduledBoardmeeting.Step7Ifinducementresolutionisapproved,Townstaffwillmeetwiththeapplicantandoutlineplansfortheissuanceofbonds.
C,,0ESTIMATED1/8%YIELDEQUALAMMUALPRINCIPALPAYMENTS10%COUPONS5—Year10-Year15—YearTermTermTerm$3,022$4,914$6,160$15,116$24,570$30,800$30,220$49,140$61,600$45,330$73,710$92,400$1million$5million$10million$15million
RESOLUTION49-82THEBOARDOFTRUSTEESOFTHETOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,herebyresolvethatduetothefloodofJuly15,1982,intheTownofEstesParkandthesurroundingarea,thereexistsastateofemerencyandtheTownofEstesParkfloodrecoverypersonnelhavearightofentryontoprivatepropertytocarryouttheirofficialfloodrelatedduties.Datedthis16thdayofJuly,1982.HarryB.Trgent,Mayor/ATTEST:
00RESOLUTION__48-82WHEREAS,theTownofEstesParkhassufferedseveredamagebroughtaboutbyfloodwatersonJuly15,1982;WHEREAS,theTownofEstesPark,Colorado,isapoliticalsubdivisionwithinthestateofColorado,and;WHEREAS,extensivedamagehasoccurredtoroadways,bridges,publicandprivatepropertywithintheTownofEstesPark,and;WHEREAS,pursuanttoColoradoDisasterEmergencyhasdeterminedthatalocalexists.NOW,THEREFOREBEITRESOLVEDthattheBoardofTrusteesofEstesParkherebydeclaresalocaldisasteremergencysituationexistswithintheTownofEstesParkandhasexistedsince6:30a.m.,July15,1982.Datedthis16thdayofJuly,1982./•,HarryB.4regent,MayortheauthoritygrantedbytheActof1973,theBoardofTrusteesdisasteremergencysituationATTEST:
C)RESOLUTION47-820CERTIFIEDCOPYOFCORPORATERESOLUTIONTOOBTAINMASTERCHARGE/VISACREDITMayorTownClerkRESOLVED,thatthetogetherwiththec,t9ky,ofthisCorporationareherebyauthorizedonbehalfofthisCorporationtoexecuteanapplicationandappropriatedocumentstoenterintoaCardholderAgreementthroughrecommendationofTheEstesParkBankwiththeFirst(AgentBankName)NationalBankofDenverwherebytheBankwillissueMasterCharge/VISAcardstoandinthenameofthisCorporationfortheuseofitsofficersandemployees.MayorTherdö4At/orpersonsauthorizedbyhim,shalldeterminethosepersonstowhomhedeemsitnecessarytoreceiveanduseaMasterCharge/VISAcardandprescribemaximumcreditlimitsforeachsuchcard.Thecard-issuingbankmay,atitsdiscretion,establishanautomaticcreditoverline.SuchpersonsareherebyauthorizedfromtimetotimeinthenameofthisCorporationtoobtaincreditbytheuseofsuchMasterCharge/VISAcardinsuchsumsasmaybereasonablynecessaryanduponsuchtermsasmaybeprescribedbyTheFirstNationalBankofDenver.TheappropriateofficersofthisCorporationareherebyauthorizedtorepaythecard-issuingbankinaccordancewiththeCardholderAgreementforallobligationsincurredbytheuseofsuchcard.Theauthoritygivenhereundershallbedeemedretroactiveandanyandallactsauthorizedhereunderperformedpriortothepassageofthisresolutionareherebyapprovedandratified.TheauthorityhereinconferredshallcontinueinfullforceandeffectuntilwrittennoticeofitsrevocationshallbereceivedbyTheEstesParkBank(AgentBankName)orTheFirstNationalBankofDenver.However,suchrevocationshallnotaffectanyindebtednessoutstandingasofthedateofterminationorincurredbeforeallMasterCharge/VISAcardsarereturnedtothecard-issuingbankatitsofficeatP.0.Box5812,T.A,Denver,Colorado80217.CERTIFICATIONTownClerkAnnJensen/rtAroftheTownofEstesParkherebycertifythattheforegoingisatruecopyofaresolutiondulyandirusteeslegalydoptedbytheBoardof,b/r’c/qfofsaidCorporation,atameetingofsaidBoarddulycalledandregularlyheld-__/19andthatsaidresolutionhasnotbeenmofedorrescinded.Dated’I/,79,y(SEAL)WhenSecretaryisamongthoseauthorized,PresidentshouldalsosignCertification.Mayor//eyitfF9768.0(1)79)tPJea5eCompleteReverseSide)
Q .0
RESOLUTION NO.46-22
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN
OF ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31—12-110,C.R.S.1973,as amended,
hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the
following described area that the requirements of the applicable
parts of Section 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as
amended,have been met;that an election is not required under
Section 31-12-107 (2),C.R.S.1973,as amended;and that no
additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the
annexation.The area eligible for annexation as BEAVER POINT
SECOND ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park is as follows:
BEAVER POINT SECOND ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park,
Colorado,a portion of the South 1/2 of Section 26 and the
North 1/2 of Section 35,Township 5 North,Range 73 west of
the 6th Principal ieridian,being more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 26 as
monumented by a G.L.O.brass capped pipe,with all bearings
relative to the East line of the Southeast 1/4 of said
Section 26 considered as bearing N01°40’39”W;thence
N89°20’02”W a distance of 762.00 feet along the South line
of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 26 to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING:thence continuing N89°20’02”W a distance of
616.06 feet to a point on the centerline of the Big Thompson
River;thence Southwesterly along the centerline of the Big
Thompson River (the following eight courses and distances
are resultant chords between points on the centerline of
said river);thence S05°34’37”E a distance of 348.26 feet;
thence S65°40’13”W a distance of 562.67 feet;
thence N29°37’36”W a distance of 220.62 feet;
thence N74°28’57”W a distance of 229.91 feet;
thence N66°41’42”W a distance of 258.95 feet;
thence S35°41’58”W a distance of 285.90 feet;
thence S07°53’34”W a distance of 216.87 feet;
thence S84°01’lO”W a distance of 229.14 feet to a point on
the Easterly right-of-way line of Larimer County Road No.67
(1iarys Lake Road);thence the following two courses and
distances along the Easterly right—of-way line of Larimer
County Road No.67 (1arys Lake Road)
thence 86.84 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
concave to the Northeast,said curve has a delta angle of
08°19’13”,a radius of 597.99 feet and is subtended by a
chord which bears N19°33’45”W a distance of 86.76 feet;
thence N15°24’08”W a distance of 556.85 feet to a point on
the Southerly right—of-way line of U.S.Highway No.36;
thence 129.84 feet along the Southerly right—of-way line of
U.S.Highway No.36 and along the arc of a non-tangent
curve concave to the Southeast,said curve has a delta angle
of 05°18’15”,a radius of 1402.50 feet and is subtended by a
chord which bears S75°26’32”W a distance of 129.79 feet;
C
thence N17°12’35”W a distance of 60.00 feet to the point of
intersection of the Northerly right—of—way line of U.S.
Highway No.36 and the Southerly right—of—way line of
Larimer County Road No.67-W (High Drive);thence
N06°l1’48”E a distance of 60.00 feet to a point on the
Northerly right-of—way line of Larimer County Road No.
67—W (High Drive);thence N23°4812”W a distance of
298.84 feet along the Northerly right—of—way line of
Larimer County Road No.67—W (High Drive);thence
leaving said Northerly right—of—way line N06°16’20”E a
distance of 170.02 feet;thence N l3°05120’E a distance of
354.90 feet;thence S89°33’40”E a distance of 50.00 feet;
thence S50°30’46”E a distance of 468.96 feet;thence
NOO°40’40”W a distance of 191.06 feet;thence S89°33’40”E a
distance of 380.50 feet to a point on the West line of the
Southeast 1/4 of said Section 26;thence N00°40’50”W a
distance of 509.57 feet along the West line of the Southeast
1/4 of said Section 26;thence S29°33’04”E a distance of
300.00 feet;thence S00°40’50”E a distance of 424.19 feet;
thence S29°33’04”E a distance of 200.00 feet;thence
S00°40’50”E a distance of 286.53 feet to a point on the
Northerly right—of—way line of U.S.Highway No.36;thence
the following two courses and distances along the Northerly
right—of—way line of U.S.Highway No.36;thence
N59°28’22”E a distance of 990.47 feet to a Colorado Dept.of
Highways brass cap in concrete;thence 507.25 feet along the
arc of a non—tangent curve to the left to a Colorado DeDt.
of Highways brass cap in concrete,Said curve has a delta
angle of 1001510611,a radius of 2835.00 feet and is
subtended by a chord which bears N54c211l21E a distance of
506.58 feet;thence leaving said Northerly richt—of—way line
S 40°46’21”E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the
centerline of U.S.Highway No.36;thence the following two
courses and distances along the centerline of U.S.Hichway
No.36;thence 512.62 feet along the arc of a curve concave
to the Northwest,said curve has a delta angle of lO°15’06”,
a radius of 2865.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which
bears S5402l’12”W a distance of 511.94 feet;thence
S59°28’22’TW a distance of 432.04 feet;thence leaving said
centerline S08°00’33”E a distance of 32.25 feet to a point
on the Southerly right-of—way line of U.S.Highway No.36;
thence S08°00’33”E a distance of 250.00 feet;thence
N59°27’12”E a distance of 326.90 feet;thence N07°32’33”W a
ãistance of 41.96 feet;thence N68°09’45”E a distance of
133.62 feet to a point on the centerline of the Big Thompson
River;thence Northeasterly along the centerline of the Big
Thompson River (the following two courses and distances are
resultant chords between points on the centerline of said
river);thence N69°27’20”E a distance of 32.46 feet;thence
S89°49’57’1E a distance of 443.86 feet;thence S01°41’02”E a
distance of 303.61 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 44.4 acres,more
or less.
DATED this 13th day of July,1982.
/
/:
,Tor 7
—2—
RESOLUTION 45-82
WHEREAS,unforeseen conditions have developed with the
Stanley Park account in the General Fund,and;
WHEREAS,said conditions will continue unless additional
funds are provided in the budget year 1982,and;
WHEREAS,the Estes Park Horse Show and Rodeo Committee
funds are adequate to fund the additional budget;
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees believes an emergency
exists which could not have been reasonably foreseen at the
time of the adoption of the budget for the year 1982.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees
of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado:
THAT the sum of $195,200 be expended from the Stanley
Park Fund of 1982.
Dated this 13th day of July,1982.
fr
Harry B.>/Tregent,Mayor
ATTEST:
Publish:July 16,1982
0 0
RESOLUTION NO.44-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN
OF ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31—12—110,C.R.S.1973,as amended,
hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the
following described area that the requirements of the applicable
parts of Section 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as
amended,have been met;that an election is not required under
Section 31-12-107 (2),C.R.S.1973,as amended;and that no
additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the
annexation.The area eligible for annexation as “FALL RIVER
ESTATES SECOND ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park is as follows:
FALL RIVER ESTATES SECOND ADDITION to the Town of Estes
Park,Colorado,a portion of the South 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 15 and the East 1/2 of the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 22,T5N,R73W of the 6th P.M.,
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 22
as monumented by a brass capped pipe,with all bearings
relative to the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 22 considered as bearing N01°05’OO”E;thence
N89°04’OO”W a distance of 305.15 feet along the South
line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:thence N89°04’OO”W a distance
of 955.10 feet continuing along the South line of the
Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to a 1/16th corner as
monumented by a pin with cap no.6499;thence
N01°15’14”E a distance of 2561.43 feet along the West
line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 22 to a 1/16th corner as monumented by a G.L.O.
brass capped pipe;thence S89°29’38”W a distance of
1289.60 feet along the South line of th Southwest 1/4
of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 15 to the
Southwest corner of said Section 15 as monumented by a
G.L.O.brass capped pipe;thence N01°19’OO”E a distance
of 1130.89 feet along the West line of said Section 22
to a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of
Larimer County Road No.20-C;thence the following five
courses and distances along said Southerly right—of—way
line of Larimer County Road No.20-C:thence 15.06
feet along the arc of non-tangent curve concave to the
Northeast,said curve has a delta angle of 00°44’Ol”,a
radius of 1176.28 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears S81°03’OO”E a distance of 15.06 feet;
thence S81°25’OO”E a distance of 598.10 feet;thence
S73°00’OO”E a distance of 304.01 feet;thence
S59°12’OO”E a distance of 269.99 feet;thence
S73°54’OO”E a distance of 268.29 feet to a point on the
Southerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.34;
0.
C)0
thence leaving said Southerly right-of-way lines
N74°18’17”E a distance of 172.05 feet to a Colorado
Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete on the
Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.34;
thence the following three courses and distances along
said Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.
34:thence S18°27’36”E a distance of 578.89 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence S34°37’24”E a distance of 285.76 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence 549°45’57”E a distance of 343.35 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in rock;thence
leaving said Northerly right—of—way line S17°05’32”W a
distance of 290.93 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways
brass cap in concrete on the Southerly right—of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;thence the following three
courses and distances along said Southerly right—of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;thence S02°40’18”E a
distance of 281.81 feet;thence 295.14 feet along the
arc of a non—tangent curve to the left,said curve has
a delta angle of 27°08’36”,a radius of 623.00 feet and
is subtended by a chord which bears S15°55’50”E a
distance of 292.39 feet;thence S29°47’36”E a distance
of 659.24 feet;thence leaving said Southerly
right—of—way line a distance of 113.52 feet along the
arc of a non—tangent curve concave to the Southeast,
said curve has a delta angle of 24°05’24”,a radius of
270.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears
S48°02’42”W a distance of 112.69 feet;thence
S36°00’OO”W a distance of 110.57 feet;thence 110.66
feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve
has a delta angle of 70°00’OO”,a radius of 90.58 feet
and is subtended by a chord which bears S01°00’OO”W a
distance of 103.91 feet;thence 206.68 feet along the
arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta
angle of 31°00’00,a radius of 382.00 feet and is
subtended by a chord which bears S18°30’OO”E a distance
of 204.17 feet;thence S03°00’OO”E a distance of 45.00
feet;thence 179.59 feet along the arc of a curve to
the right,said curve has a delta angle of 21°00’OO”,a
radius of 490.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which
bears S07°30’OO”W a distance of 178.59 feet;thence
165.81 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said
curve has a delta angle of 100°00’OO”,a radius of
95.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears
S68°00’OO”W a distance of 145.55 feet;thence
S28°00’OO”W a distance of 105.68 feet;thence
S01°00’OO”W a distance of 98.62 feet to a point on the
South line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 22 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 95.614
acres.
DATED this 22nd day of June,1982.
//
-‘Nayor ./
—2—
0 0
RESOLUTION NO.40-82
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees of the Town of
Estes Park has,at a meeting duly convened on June 8,1982,
considered pertinent and material data and information
concerning a proposed increase in base rates affecting
electric service provided both within and outside the corporate
limits of the Town;and
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees,after reviewing
and fully considering all pertinent and material data so
presented and after receiving the recommendation of the
Light and Power Committee,does hereby determine and find
that the proposed increase in base electric rates to be
charged both within and outside the boundaries of the Town
is required to offset increases in the operating and capital
costs of providing electric service and is necessary to
permit the Town to continue to provide electric service on a
reliable and sound economic basis and to satisfy the debt
service obligations of its electric utility system;and
WHEREAS,it is recognized that the Public Utili
ties Commission of the State of Colorado (hereafter some
times referred to as “PUC”or “Commission”)currently
exercises jurisdiction over the electric rates and electric
service provided to consumers outside the corporate limits
of the Town (hereafter referred to as “jurisdictional service”)
and
WHEREAS,the increase proposed will result in the
same rates,within the same rate class,for customers receiving
se-rvice either within or and outside the boundaries of the
Town;and
WHEREAS,it is desirable that such new rates be
effective on the same date for consumers within the corpor
ate limits of the Town and consumers outside the boundaries
of the Town;and
0 0
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees will adopt an
appropriate ordinance implementing new rates following final
Commission approval with respect to rate adjustments appli
cable to service provided outside the municipal boundaries
of the Town;and
WHEREAS,it is the intent of the Board of Trustees
that said ordinance to be later adopted as described immed
iately above will also be applicable to electric service
provided inside the municipal boundaries of the Town.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,as follows:
1.That the above recitals are incorporated
by reference in this resolution.
2.That the proposed rates for electric service
within and outside the Town of Estes Park is set forth
in the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated herein
as if fully set forth.
3.The Board of Trustees hereby authorizes the
Town Administrator and other officials of the Town to
file with the Public Utilities Commission of the State
of Colorado such documents and to take such action,including
the employment of personnel and the payment therefor,
as may be necessary to obtain the approval of said Public
Utilities Commission as may be required under applicable
law for changes in rates for electric service,but subject
only to such jurisdiction as may exist in the Public
Utilities Commission relative to electric service provided
outside the municipal boundaries of the Town.
4.That notice of the proposed rate schedule
modifications and rate adjustments shall be given by
individual mailed notice to all affected customers
receiving service outside the municipal boundaries of
—2—
C 0
the Town,as required pursuant to applicable rules and
regulations of the Public Utilities Commission.
5.That the proposed rate schedule modifications
and rate adjustments for customers receiving electric
service inside the municipal boundaries of the Town
shall not be implemented until such time as the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado has
approved new rate schedules (by operation of law or by
specific decisions)for customers receiving electric
service outside the municipal boundaries of the Town,
and pursuant to an ordinance to be duly adopted by the
Board of Trustees subsequent to said approval of the
Public Utilities Commission.
6.That a summary of the proposed rate schedule
modifications and rate adjustments shall be provided
to customers receiving service inside the municipal
boundaries of the Town by either publication or by
mailed notice.
Passed by the Board of Trustees this 8th day of
June,1982,and signed this 8th day of June,1982.
/Mayor
Town of Estes Park,Colorado
I hereby certify and attest that the foregoing
resolution was introduced,read and passed at a regular
meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park
on the 8th day of June,1982.
—3—
0 0
PROPOSED MONTHLY PATES
A.Residential Service
1.Customer Charge:
2.Energy Charge:
3.Minimum:
B.Residential Service —Demand
1.Customer Charge:
2.Demand Charge:
3.Energy Charge:
4.Monthly Minimum Billing
Demand:
3.Energy Use During
Non—Heat Storage
Period:
4.Minimum:
$2.00
All Kwh used during Heat
Storage Period (11:00 P.M.
to 5:00 A.M.daily)
$0.0375 per Kwh
Billed under the Residential
Service —Demand Metered
Rate Schedule
$2.00
D.General Service Small
1.Customer Charge:
2.Energy Charge:
3.Minimum:
E.General Service Large
1.Demand Charge:
2.Energy Charge:
3.Monthly Minimum Billing
Demand:
4.Minimum Monthly Bill:
F.Municipal Service
1.Energy Charge:
$7.20
$0.06845 per Kwh
$7.20
$9.00 per Kw of
billing demand
$0.0299 per Kwh
60%of the highest billing
demand established during the
immediately preceding months
of November through March
$9.00 per Kw times Monthly
Minimum Billing Demand
or $50.00,whichever is
greater.
EXHIBIT A
$2.00
$0.06358 per Kwh
$2.00
Metered
$2.00
$4.80 per Kw of
billing demand
$0.033l4 per Kwh
60%of the highest
billing demand estab
lished in the most
recent twelve month
period
Customer Charge,plus
$4.80 per Kw times
Monthly Minimum Billing
Demand
5.Minimum Monthly Bill:
C.Residential Heat Storage
1.Customer Charge:
2.Energy Charge:
$0.06l84 pe;Kwh
C C V
RESOLUTION NO.41-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN
OF ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31-12—110,C.R.S.1973,as amended,
hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the
following described area that the requirements of the applicable
parts of Sections 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as
amended,have been met;that an election is not required under
Section 31—12—107 (2),C.R.S.1973,as amended;and that no
additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the
annexation.The area eligible for annexation as “BEAVER POINT
FIRST ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park is as follows:
BEAVER POINT FIRST ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park,
Colorado,a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25
and the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26,T5N,R73W of the
6th P.M.,being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 25
as monumented by a G.L.O.brass capped pipe,with all
bearings relative to the West line of the Southwest 1/4
of said Section 25 considered as bearing N0l°40’39”W;
thence N01°40’39”W a distance of 1391.97 feet along the
West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 25 to a
point on the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;thence
the following three courses and distances along the
Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.36;
thence S62°23’58”W a distance of 671.65 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence 172.20 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
to the left to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of 13°13’12”,
a radius of 746.30 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears S55°50’56”W a distance of 171.81 feet;
thence S49°12’02”W a distance of 182.00 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way line
S40°46’21”E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the
centerline of U.S.Highway No.36;thence the following
two courses and distances along the centerline of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence 512.62 feet along the arc of a
curve concave to the Northwest,said curve has a delta
angle of 10°15’06”,a radius of 2865.00 feet and is
subtended by a chord which bears S54°21’12”W a distance
of 511.94 feet;thence S59°28’22”W a distance of 432.04
feet;thence leaving said centerline S08°00’33”E a
distance of 32.25 feet to a point on the Southerly
right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.36;thence
S08°0033”E a distance of 250.00 feet;thence
N59°27’12”E a distance of 326.90 feet;thence
N07°32’33”W a distance of 41.96 feet;thence
N68°09’45”E a distance of 133.62 feet to a point on the
o a
centerline of the Big Thompson River;thence
Northeasterly along the centerline of the Big Thompson
River (the following seven courses and distances are
resultant chords between points on the centerline of
said river):thence N69°27’20”E a distance of 32.46
feet;thence S89°49’57”E a distance of 563.23 feet;
thence N68°47’58”E a distance of 531.92 feet;
thence N01°19’52”E a distance of 181.10 feet;
thence N36°53’32”E a distance of 158.36 feet;
thence S86°38’13”E a distance of 442.53 feet;
thence N56°50’32”E a distance of 159.42 feet to a point
on the Northerly extension of a barbed wire fence;
thence leaving said centerline S17°58’58”E a distance
of 101.45 feet along said barbed wire fence,and the
Northerly and Southerly extensions thereof,to a point
on the Southerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive
as platted in High Pines Subdivision (30 foot width);
thence the following six courses and distances along
the Southerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive as
platted in High Pines Subdivision (30 foot width):
thence N66°51’21”E a distance of 176.52 feet;
thence N63°43’21”E a distance of 182.42 feet;
thence N52°15’21”E a distance of 142.60 feet;
thence N17°30’21”E a distance of 201.07 feet;
thence N38°51’21”E a distance of 231.35 feet;
thence N50°27’21”E a distance of 104.34 feet;thence
leaving the Southerly right-of-way line of said 30 foot
wide right—of—way S01°44’29”E a distance of 16.26 feet;
thence N53°53’58”E a distance of 302.22 feet to the
Southwest corner of the Kinnie Addition to the Town of
Estes Park;thence leaving said Southerly right-of-way
line with the following two courses and distances along
the West line of the Kinnie Addition:thence
N19°14’38”W a distance of 73.15 feet to a pin with cap
no.532;thence N19°14’38”W a distance of 648.48 feet
to a point on the centerline of the Big Thompson River;
thence Northeasterly along the centerline of the Big
Thompson River (the following four courses and
distances are resultant chords between points on the
centerline of said river):
thence N27°38’14”E a distance of 72.23 feet;
thence N63°19’SB”E a distance of 116.50 feet;
thence N69°31’58”E a distance of 547.45 feet;
thence S86°40’OO”E a distance of 72.06 feet to a point
on the West line of the Lee and Alps Addition to the
Town of Estes Park;thence leaving said centerline
N00°21’35”E a distance of 69.78 feet along the West
line of the Lee and Alps Addition to a point on the
South line of the First Resubdivision of Buenna Vista
Terrace Subdivision and the North line of the Southwest
1/4 of said Section 25,said point bears N89°38’25”W a
distance of 550.00 feet from the Center 1/4 corner of
said Section 25;thence N89°38’25”W a distance of
225.87 feet along the South line of the First
Resubdivision of Buenna Vista Terrace Subdivision to a
point on the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence the following six courses and
distances along the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence 72.00 feet along the arc of a
non—tangent curve concave to the Southeast,said curve
has a delta angle of 06°50’27”,a radius of 603.00 feet
and is subtended by a chord which bears S67°30’33”W a
distance of 71.95 feet;thence S64°05’21”W a distance
of 411.73 feet;thence 283.57 feet along the arc of a
curve to the left to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass
cap in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of
26°56’38”,a radius of 603.00 feet and is subtended by
a chord which bears S50°37’Ol”W a distance of 280.96
feet;thence S37°08’43”W a distance of 167.27 feet to a
—2—
0 0
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence 831.30 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
to the right to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of 25°20’06”,
a radius of 1880.00 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears S49°46’18”W a distance of 824.54 feet;
thence S62°23’58”W a distance of 490.94 feet to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 51.2 acres,
more or less.
DATED this 8th day of June,1982.
May ‘/
ATTEST:
—3—
C0RESOLUTIONNO.42-82RESOLUTIONARESOLUTIONAUTHORIZINGTHEBOARDOFCOUNTYCOMMISSIONERSOFLARIMERCOUNTY,COLORADOTOISSUEREVENUEBONDSFORTHEPURPOSEOFPROVIDINGADEQUATERESIDENTIALHOUSINGFACILITIESFORLOWANDMIDDLEINCOMEFAMILIESANDPERSONSONBEHALFOFTHISMUNICIPALITY.WHEREAS,pursuanttotheCountyandMunicipalityDevelopmentRevenueBondsAct,ColoradoRevisedStatutesSection29—3—101etseq.,asamended(the“Act”),acountyormunicipalitymayissuerevenuebondstofinanceresidentialfacilitiesforlowandmiddleincomefamiliesandpersons;andWHEREAS,Section29—3—101(2)oftheActauthorizesanycountyormunicipalityoftheStateofColorado(the“State”)toirrevocablydelegateforthetermofanybondissuetoanyothercountyormunicipalityoftheStateauthoritytoactonitsbehalfincarryingoutanyofthepurposesoftheAct;andWHEREAS,theBoardofCountyCommissionersofLarimerCounty,Colorado(the“County”)hasdeterminedtoissueitsSingleFamilyMortgageRevenueBonds,1982SeriesA(the“Bonds”)tofinancecertainresidentialfacilitieslocatedwithintheCountyforlowandmiddleincomefamiliesandpersons(tile“Project”);andWHEREAS,theProjectwillbenefittheresidentsofEstesPark(the“Municipality”)NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHEBOARDOFTRUSTEESoftheTOWNOFESTESPARK,COLORADO,ASFOLLOWS:Section1.TheMunicipality,pursuanttoSection29—3—101(2)oftheAct,herebyirrevocablydelegatestotheCountyforthetermoftheBondstheMunicipality’sauthorityundertheActtoissuerevenuebondsforthepurposefinancingresidentialfacilitiesforlowandmiddleincomefamiliesandpersonssuchastheProject.Section2.Thisresolutionshallbeeffectiveimmediatelyuponitspassage.
00lb.StateofColoradoCountyofLarimer)ss.TownofEstesPark)I,AnnEJensen,beingthedulyappointedandactingTownClerkoftheTownofEstesPark,Colorado,doherebycertifytheabovetobeatrueandcorrectcopyofaResolutionpassedandadoptedbytheBoardofTrusteesoftheTownofEstesParkonthe_8jdayofJune,1982.TownClerk/’/
C
RESOLUTION NO.43-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31-12—107 (1)(g),C.R.S.1973,as
amended,hereby states its intention to annex the area described
herein.The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the
Petition filed with the Town requesting annexation of the area
described herein is in substantial compliance with Section
31-12—107 (1),C.R.S.1973,as amended.The Board of Trustees
further finds and determines that the Petition is signed by
persons comprising more than fifty percent (50%)of the land
owners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning more than
fifty percent (50%)of the area,excluding public streets,
and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality.
Such area,if annexed,will be known as “BEAVER POINT SECOND
ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park,Colorado.Such area is
described as follows:
BEAVER POINT SECOND ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
a portion of the South 1/2 of Section 26 and the North 1/2 of
Section 35,Township 5 North,Range 73 West of the 6th Principal
Meridian,being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 26
as monumented by a G.L.O.brass capped pipe,with all
bearings relative to the East line of the Southeast 1/4
of said Section 26 considered as bearing N01°40’39”W;
thence N89°20’02”W a distance of 762.00 feet along the
South line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 26 to
the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:thence continuing
N89°20’02”W a distance of 616.06 feet to a point on the
centerline of the Big Thompson River;thence
Southwesterly along the centerline of the Big Thompson
River (the following eight courses and distances are
resultant chords between points on the centerline of
said river);thence S05°34’37”E a distance of 348.26
feet;thence S65°40’13”W a distance of 562.67 feet;
thence N89°37’36”W a distance of 220.62 feet;
thence N74°28’57”W a distance of 229.91 feet;
thence N66°41’42”W a distance of 258.95 feet;
thence S35°41’58”W a distance of 285.90 feet;
thence S07°53’34”W a distance of 216.87 feet;
thence S84°01’lO”W a distance of 229.14 feet to a point
on the Easterly right-of-way line of Larimer County
Road No.67 (Marys Lake Road);thence the following two
courses and distances along the Easterly right-of—way
line of Larimer County Road No.67 (Marys Lake Road):
thence 86.84 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
concave to the Northeast,said curve has a delta angle
0 Q
of 08°19’13”,a radius of 597.99 feet and is subtended
by a chord which bears N19°33’45”W a distance of 86.76
feet;thence N15°24’08”W a distance of 556.85 feet to a
point on the Southerly right-of—way line of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence 129.84 feet along the Southerly
right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.36 and along the
arc of a non—tangent curve concave to the Southeast,
said curve has a delta angle of 05°18’15”,a radius of
1402.50 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears
S75°26’32”W a distance of 129.79 feet;thence
N17°12’35”W a distance of 60.00 feet to the point of
intersection of the Northerly right-of-way line of U.
S.Highway No.36 and the Southerly right-of-way line
of Larimer County Road No.67-W (High Drive);thence
N06°11’48”E a distance of 60.00 feet to a point on the
Northerly right-of-way line of Larimer County Road No.
67—W (High Drive);thence N83°48’12”W a distance of
298.84 feet along the Northerly right-of—way line of
Larimer County Road No.67-W (High Drive);thence
leaving said Northerly right-of-way line N06°16’20”E a
distance of 170.02 feet;thence N 13°05’20”E a distance
of 354.90 feet;thence S89°33’40”E a distance of 50.00
feet;thence S50°30’46”E a distance of 468.96 feet;
thence N00°40’40”W a distance of 191.06 feet;thence
S89°33’40”E a distance of 380.50 feet to a point on the
West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 26;
thence N00°40’50”W a distance of 509.57 feet along the
West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 26;
thence S89°33’04”E a distance of 300.00 feet;
thence S00°40’SO”E a distance of 424.19 feet;
thence S89°33’04”E a distance of 200.00 feet;
thence S00°40’50”E a distance of 286.53 feet to a point
on the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.
36;thence the following two courses and distances
along the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway
No.36;thence N59°28’22”E a distance of 990.47 feet to
a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence 507.25 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
to the left to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of 10°15’06”,
a radius of 2835.00 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears N54°21’12”E a distance of 506.58 feet;
thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way line S
40°46’21”E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the
centerline of U.S.Highway No.36;thence the
following two courses and distances along the
centerline of U.S.Highway No.36;thence 512.62 feet
along the arc of a curve concave to the Northwest,said
curve has a delta angle of 10°15’06”,a radius of
2865.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears
S54°21’12”W a distance of 511.94 feet;thence
S59°28’22”W a distance of 432.04 feet;thence leaving
said centerline S08°00’33”E a distance of 32.25 feet to
a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence S08°00’33”E a distance of 250.00
feet;thence N59°27’12”E a distance of 326.90 feet;
thence N07°3V33”W a distance of 41.96 feet;thence
N68°09’45”E a distance of 133.62 feet to a point on the
centerline of the Big Thompson River;thence
Northeasterly along the centerline of the Big Thompson
River (the following two courses and distances are
resultant chords between points on the centerline of
said river);thence N69°27’20”E a distance of 32.46
feet;thence S89°49’57”E a distance of 443.86 feet;
thence S01°41’02”E a distance of 303.61 feet to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 44.4 acres,
more or less.
—2—
0 0
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That in accordance with Section
31-12—108,C.R.S.1973,as amended,a public hearing shall
be held on July 13,1982 ,at 7:30 P.M.in the Municipal
Building,located at 170 MacGregor,Estes Park,Colorado,
for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation
complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12—104
and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as amended.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That the Town Clerk shall give
the notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31—12-108 (2),
C.R.S.1973,as amended.
DATED this 91 day ,1982.
iØyor
ATTEST:-
—3—
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 39-22
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31-12-107 (1)(g),C.R.S.1973,as
amended,hereby states its intention to annex the area described
herein.The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the petition
is in substantial compliance with Section 31—12-107 (1)(g),C.R.S.
1973,as amended.The Board of Trustees further finds and determines
that the petition is signed by the landowners of more than fifty
percent (50%)of the area to be annexed,excluding public streets
and alleys.Such area,as annexed,will be known as “Fall River
Estates Second Addition”to the Town of Estes Park,Colorado.Such
area is described as follows:
FALL RIVER ESTATES SECOND ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,a portion of the South
1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 15 and the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22,
T5N.R73W of the 6th P.M.,being mote particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 22 as monumented by a brass capped pipe,
with all bearings relative to the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 considered
as bearing NOT’05’OO’E;thence N89’04’OOW a distance of 305.15 feet along the South line of
the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence N8904’OOW a distance of 955.20 feet continuing along the South line of the
Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to a 1/16th corner as monumented by a pin with cap
no.6499;
thence N0115’14’E a distance of 2561.43 feet along the West line of the East 1/2 of the
Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to a 1/16th corner as monumented by a G.L.O.brass
capped pipe:
thence SB929’38W a distance of 1289.60 feet along the South line of the Southwest 1/4
of the Southwest 2/4 of said Section 15 to the Southwest corner of said Section 15
as monumented by a G.L.O.brass capped pipe:
thence N0119’OO”E a distance of 1130.89 feet along the West line of said Section 22 to
a point on the Southerly right—of—way line of Larimer County Road No.20—C;
thence the following five courses and distances along said Southerly right—of—way line of
Larimer County Road No.20—C:
thence 15.06 feet along the arc of non—tangent curve concave to the Northeast,said curve
has a delta angle of 004401”,a radius of 1176.28 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears S8103’00E a distance of 15.06 feet;
thence SB125’OO”E a distance of 598.10 feet;
thence S730000E a distance of 304.01 feet;
thence S5912’00E a distance of 269.99 feet;
thence S7354’OO”E a distance of 268.29 feet to a point on the Southerly right—of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;
thence leaving said Southerly right—of—way lines N7418’17’E a distance of 172.05 feet
to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete on the Northerly right—of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;
thence the following three courses and distances along said Northerly right—of—way line of
U.S.Highway No.34:
thence S1827’36E a distance of 578.89 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete;
thence S343724”E a distance of 285.76 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete:
thence S49’45’57E a distance of 343.35 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in rock;
thence leaving said Northerly right—of—way line S1705’32W a distance of 290.93 feet
to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete on the Southerly right—of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;
39—82
o 0
thence the following three courses and distances along said Southerly right—of—way line ofU.S.Highway No.34:
thence S02’40’f8”E a distance of 281.81 feet;
thence 295.14 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve to the left,said curve has a
delta angle of 2708’36,a radius of 623.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which
bears S1555’50E a distance of 292.39 feet;
thence S294736KE a distance of 659.24 feet;
thence leaving said Southerly right—of—way line a distance of ff3.52 feet along the arc
of a non—tangent curve concave to the Southeast,said curve has a delta angle of
2405’24”,a radius of 270.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S4B02’42W
a distance of 112.69 feet;
thence S360000NW a distance of 110.57 feet;
thence 110.66 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve has a delta angle of
7000’OO,a radius of 90.58 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S0100’00W
8 distance of 103.91 feet;
thence 206.68 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta angle of
31’OO’OO’,a radius of 382.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears Sf830’00E
a distance of 204.17 feet;
thence S0300’00E a distance of 45.00 feet;
thence 179.59 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta angle of
2100’OO’,a radius of 490.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S0730’OO”W
a distance of 178.59 feet;
thence 165.81 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta angle of
10000.00k,a radius of 95.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S6B00’00W
a distance of 145.55 feet;
thence S2800’00W a distance of 105.68 feet;
thence S0f’00’00W a distance of 98.62 feet to a point on the South line of the East 1/2
of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 95.614 acres.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That in accordance with Section 31-
12-108 C.R.S.1973,as amended,a public hearing shall be held
on June 22,1982 at 7:30 p.m.,in the Municipal Building,located
at 170 MacGregor Avenue,Estes Park,Colorado,for the purpose
of determining if the proposed annexation meets with the relevant
provisions of Sections 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as
amended.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That the Town Clerk shall give the
notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31-11-108 (2),C.R.S.
1973,as amended.
Dated this 11th day of May,1982.
—
Q 0
RESOLUTION NO.3$-$2
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31—12—107 (1)(g),C.R.S.1973,as
amended,hereby states its intention to annex the area described
herein.The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the
Petition filed with the Town requesting annexation of the area
described herein is in substantial compliance with Section
31—12—107 (1),C.R.S.1973,as amended.The Board of Trustees
further finds and determines that the Petition is signed by
persons comprising more than fifty (50%)percent of the land
owners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning more than
fifty (50%)percent of the area,excluding public streets,
and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality.
Such area,if annexed,will be known as “BEAVER POINT FIRST
ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park,Colorado.Such area is
described as follows:
BEAVER POINT FIRST ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park,
Colorado,a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 25
and the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26,T5N,R73W of the
6th P.M.,being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 25
as monumented by a G.L.O.brass capped pipe,with all
hearings relative to the West line of the Southwest 1/4
of said Section 25 considered as bearing N01°40’39”W;
thence N01°40’39”W a distance of 1391.97 feet along the
West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 25 to a
point on the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;thence
the following three courses and distances along the
Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.36;
thence S62°23’58”W a distance of 671.65 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence 172.20 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
to the left to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of 13°13’12”,
a radius of 746.30 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears S55°50’56”W a distance of 171.81 feet;
thence S49°12’02”W a distance of 182.00 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way line
S40°46’21”E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the
centerline of U.S.Highway No.36;thence the following
two courses and distances along the centerline of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence 512.62 feet along the arc of a
curve concave to the Northwest,said curve has a delta
angle of 10°15’06”,a radius of 2865.00 feet and is
G 0
subtended by a chord which bears S54°2P12”W a distance
of 511.94 feet;thence S59°28’22”W a distance of 432.04
feet;thence leaving said centerline S08°00’33”E a
distance of 32.25 feet to a point on the Southerly
right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.36;thence
S08°00’33”E a distance of 250.00 feet;thence
N59°27’12”E a distance of 326.90 feet;thence
N07°32’33”W a distance of 41.96 feet;thence
N68°0945”E a distance of 133.62 feet to a point on the
centerline of the Big Thompson River;thence
Northeasterly along the centerline of the Big Thompson
River (the following seven courses and distances are
resultant chords between points on the centerline of
said river):thence N69°27’20”E a distance of 32.46
feet;thence S89°49’57”E a distance of 563.23 feet;
thence N68°47’58”E a distance of 531.92 feet;
thence N01°19’52”E a distance of 181.10 feet;
thence N36c53I321IE a distance of 158.36 feet;
thence S86°38’13”E a distance of 442.53 feet;
thence N56°50’32”E a distance of 159.42 feet to a point
on the Northerly extension of a barbed wire fence;
thence leaving said centerline S17°58’58”E a distance
of 101.45 feet along said barbed wire fence,and the
Northerly and Southerly extensions thereof,to a point
on the Southerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive
as platted in High Pines Subdivision (30 foot width);
thence the following six courses and distances along
the Southerly right-of-way line of Riverside Drive as
platted in High Pines Subdivision (30 foot width):
thence N66°51’21”E a distance of 176.52 feet;
thence N63°43’21”E a distance of 182.42 feet;
thence N52°15’21”E a distance of 142.60 feet;
thence N17°30’21”E a distance of 201.07 feet;
thence N38°51’21”E a distance of 231.35 feet;
thence N50°27’21”E a distance of 104.34 feet;thence
leaving the Southerly right-of-way line of said 30 foot
wide right—of-way S01°44’29”E a distance of 16.26 feet
to a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of
Riverside Drive (60 foot width);thence N53°53’58”E a
distance of 302.22 feet along the Southerly
right-of-way line of Riverside Drive (60 foot width)to
the Southwest corner of the Kinnie Addition to the Town
of Estes Park;thence leaving said Southerly
right-of-way line with the following two courses and
distances along the West line of the Kinnie Addition:
thence N19°14’38”W a distance of 73.15 feet to a pin
with cap no.532;thence N19°14’38”W a distance of
648.48 feet to a point on the centerline of the Big
Thompson River;thence Northeasterly along the
centerline of the Big Thompson River (the following
four courses and distances are resultant chords between
points on the centerline of said river):
thence N27°38’14”E a distance of 72.23 feet;
thence N63°19’SS”E a distance of 116.50 feet;
thence N69°3P58”E a distance of 547.45 feet;
thence S86°40’OO”E a distance of 72.06 feet to a point
on the West line of the Lee and Alps Addition to the
Town of Estes Park;thence leaving said centerline
N00°21’35”E a distance of 69.78 feet along the West
line of the Lee and Alps Addition to a point on the
South line of the First Resubdivision of Buenna Vista
Terrace Subdivision and the North line of the Southwest
1/4 of said Section 25,said point bears N89°38’25”W a
distance of 550.00 feet from the Center 1/4 corner of
said Section 25;thence N89°38’25”W a distance of
225.87 feet along the South line of the First
Resubdivision of Buenna Vista Terrace Subdivision to a
point on the Northerly right--of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence the following six courses and
distances along the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.
Highway No.36;thence 72.00 feet along the arc of a
non—tangent curve concave to the Southeast,said curve
—2—
0 0
has a delta anqie of 06°50’27”,a radius of 603.00 feet
and is subtended by a chord which bears S67°30’33”W a
distance of 71.95 feet;thence S64°05’21”W a distance
of 411.73 feet;thence 223.57 feet along the arc of a
curve to the left to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass
cap in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of
26°56’38,a radius of 603.00 feet and is subtended by
a chord which bears S50°37’Ol”W a distance of 280.96
feet;thence S37°08’43”W a distance of 167.27 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence 831.30 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve
to the right to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete,said curve has a delta angle of 25°20’06”,
a radius of 1880.00 feet and is subtended by a chord
which bears S49°46’18”W a distance of 824.54 feet;
thence S62°23’58”W a distance of 490.94 feet to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 51.2 acres,
more or less.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That in accordance with Section
31—12—108,C.R.S.1973,as amended,a public hearing shall
be held on June 8,1982 ,at 7:30 P.M.,in the Municipal
Building,located at 170 MacGregor,Estes Park,Colorado,
for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation
complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31—12—104
and 31—12—105,C.RS.1973,as amended.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That the Town Clerk shall give
the notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31-12—108 (2),
C.R.S.1973,as amended.
DATED this 27th day of April ,1982.
$ayor
ATTEST:
—3—
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 37-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the petition and plat of Columbine Ridge Subdivision
are hereby approved and that the Mayor and Town Clerk be
authorized and directed to sign the plat.
Adopted:April 27,1982
7—82
R E S 0 1 U T I 0 36 -22
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the final plat of Prospect Estates Subdivision (Lots
1—18)are hereby approved subject to the receipt of the attorneyFs
letter of certification and that the Mayor and Town Clerk be
authorized and directed to sign said final plat upon the receipt
of said letter.
Adopted:April 27,1982
4-82
C
RE SOLUT ION 35-22
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park and Jim
Mihalek for nighttime rodeo performances at Stanley Park during
Summer 1982.
Adopted:April 13,1982
5—82
Th
RESOLUTION 34-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the filing date of the application for a new Beer
and Wine License filed by Anthony F.and Kathy Ricciardi dba
Big Horn Cafe located at 401 West Elkhorn Avenue1 Estes Park,
Colorado,is April 13,1982,and it is hereby ordered that
a public hearing on said application shall be held in the Board
Room of the Municipal Building,170 MacGregor Avenue,on May19,
1982 at 7:30 p.m.,and that the neighborhood boundaries for
the purpose of said application and hearing shall be the area
included within a radius of 2.39 miles as measured from the
center of the applicants’property.
Adopted:April 13,1982
4—P 2
0 0
RESOLUTION 33 -82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31-12—110,C.R.S.1973,as amended,
hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the
following described area that the requirements of the applicable
parts of Sections 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as
amended,have been met;that an election is not required under
Section 31-12—107 (2),C.R.S.1973,as amended;and that no
additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the
annexation.The area eligible for annexation as “FALL RIVER
ESTATES FIRST ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park is as follows:
A portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 22,T5N,R73W of the 6th P.M.,being more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 22
as monumented by a brass capped pipe,with all bearings
relative to the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 22 considered as bearing N01°05’OO”E;thence
N01°05’OO”E a distance of 1079.94 feet along the East
line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to a point
on the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway No.
34;thence the following five courses and distances
along said Northerly right-of-way line of U.S.Highway
No.34:thence N29°49’39W a distance of 5.24 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence N29°45’47”W a distance of 246.09 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence N29°49’59”W a distance of 298.92 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence N15°56’36”W a distance of 245.46 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete;
thence N02°51’06”W a distance of 556.16 feet to a
Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in rock;thence
leaving said Northerly right-of—way line S17°04’33”W a
distance of 290.94 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways
brass cap in concrete on the Southerly right-of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;thence the following three
courses and distances along said Southerly right—of-way
line of U.S.Highway No.34:thence S02°40’56”E a
distance of 281.79 feet;thence 295.14 feet along the
arc of a non—tangent curve to the left;said curve has
a delta angle of 27°08’37”,a radius of 623.00 feet and
is subtended by a chord which bears S15°56’36”E a
distance of 292.39 feet;thence S29°48’22”E a distance
of 659.61 feet;thence leaving said Southerly
right—of-way line a distance of 113.34 feet along the
arc of a non—tangent curve concave to the Southeast,
said curve has a delta angle of 24°03’03”,a radius of
270.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears
S48°01’31”W a distance of 112.51 feet;thence
S36°00’OO”W a distance of 110.57 feet;thence 110.66
).,__C))
0 0
feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve
has a delta angle of 7000010011,a radius of 90.58 feet
and is subtended by a chord which bears S01°00’OO”W a
distance of 103.91 feet;thence 206.68 feet along the
arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta
angle of 31°00’OO”,a radius of 382.00 feet and is
subtended by a chord which bears S18°30’OO”E a distance
of 204.17 feet;thence S03°00’OO”E a distance of 45.00
feet;thence 179.59 feet along the arc of a curve to
the right,said curve has a delta angle of 21°00’OO”,a
radius of 490.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which
bears 507°30’OO”W a distance of 178.59 feet;thence
165.81 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said
curve has a delta angle of 100°00’OO”,a radius of
95.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears
S68°00’OO”W a distance of 145.55 feet;thence
S22°00’OO”W a distance of 105.62 feet;thence
S01°00’OO”W a distance of 98.62 feet to a point on the
South line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 22;thence S89°04’OO”E a distance of 305.15
feet along the South line of the East 1/2 of the
Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to the Center 1/4
corner of said Section 22 and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 6.549 acres.
DATED this i3 day of April,1982.
Mayor /7
ATTEST:
)/
guc)L
—2—
0•0
R I S 0 L U T I 0 N 32-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLORADO:
That the final plat of Saint Vram Center Subdivision and
petition for exception to Section 16.16.060 of the Municipal Code
are hereby approved and that the Mayor and Town Clerk are authorized
and directed to sign the plat.
Adopted:April 13,1982
2—82
n
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 31 -82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park,
Park School District R-3,and the Community Church of the Rockies
regarding the ownership and maintenance of the 6”waterline
serving the schools and Community Church.
Adopted:April 13,1982
fl—82
RESOLUTION 30-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park and Holaways
Plumbing Service for the construction of the Lexington LaneJAspen
Avenue waterline.
Adopted:April 13,1982
0-82
o C
RESOLUTION 29-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement between the Town of Estes Park and the
Colorado C.A.R.E.Inc.for performances at Stanley Park during
August 3—8,1982.
Adopted:March 23,1982
9—82
0 0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 28-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the petition and plat of Regal Pines Resubdivision
are hereby approved and that the Mayor and Clerk are authorized
and directed to sign the plat.
Adopted:March 23,1982
8—82
o 0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 27-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ESTES PARK
GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB,INC.:
That the President and Secretary be authorized and directed
to execute a disclaimer on behalf of the Estes Park Golf and
Country Club,Inc.regarding a small strip of land located on
the west side of the Estes Park Golf Course which is specifically
referred to in law suit #8O-CV—748 Scott vs.Nagl.
Adopted:March 23,1982
7—82
0
RESOLUTION 26-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized and directed to
execute a disclaimer regarding a small strip of land located
on the west side of the Estes Park Golf and Country Club which
is specifically referred to in law suit #80-CV-748 Scott vs.
Nagl.
Adopted:March 23,1982
6—82
0 0
RESOLUTION 25-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to execute the lease purchase agreement with the First National
Bank of Estes Park to finance a new telephone system being pur
chased from Executone of Colorado,Inc.
Adopted:March 23,1982
5—82
0 .0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 24-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park
and the Colorado State High School Rodeo Association for per
formances at Stanley Park during June 16 -19,1982.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
24—82
0
RESOLUTION 23-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park
and Larimer County regarding the collection of sales tax on
motor vehicles.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
3—8
0 0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 22 -$2
WHEREAS,unforeseen conditions have developed with the
advertising account in the General Fund Budget,and;
WHEREAS,said conditions will continue unless additional
funds are provided in the budget for the year 1982,and;
WHEREAS,sufficient funds for advertising were not
provided in the 1982 budget,and;
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees believes an emergency exists
which could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time of
the adoption of the budget for the year 1982
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees
of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado:
THAT the sum of $30,000 for advertising be expended from
the Capital Fund,General Government Buildings Miscellaneous
of 1982.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
2—22
C C
RESOLUTION 21-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park
and W.W.Wheeler and Associates,Inc.regarding a water needs
study and analysis.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
0 0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 20-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement among the Town of Estes Park,Mountain
Bell,and Estes Park Cable TV Company regarding pole usage.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
0—82
0 0
RESOLUTION 19-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Agreement dated August 7,1981 by and between
the Town of Estes Park and Estes Park Cable TV Company be amended
to permit the moving of PTL from the midband tier to the basic
tier of service in place of KBDI (12)Denver educational channel.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
9—82
fl
RESOLUTION 18-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That Section 7 (B)of the Agreement dated August 7,1981
by and between the Town of Estes Park and Estes Park Cable TV
Company be amended to permit a construction extension to May
31,1982.
ADOPTED:March 9,1982
8—82
C C
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 17-82
WHEREAS,by the Statutes of the State of Colorado,the 6th
day of April,1982 is fixed as the time for the election of three
trustees of the Town of Estes Park;
AND WHEREAS,Senate Bill 251 amended Section 31-10-401 C.R.S.
1973,as amended,which allows the Board of Trustees to delegate
to the Clerk by Resolution the authority and responsibility to
appoint the judges of election.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees of
the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,that the Clerk of the Town of
Estes Park be authorized and directed to appoint the judges of
election in accordance with the State Statutes for the municipal
election scheduled for April 6,1982.
Adopted:February 23,1982
.7—82
0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 16-82
WHEREAS,by the Statutes of the State of Colorado,the 6th
day of April,1982 is fixed as the time for the election of three
trustees of the Town of Estes Park;
AND WHEREAS,it is the duty of the Board of Trustees to provide
for holding such election.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that an election for the purpose
of electing three trustees shall be held on Tuesday,April 6,
1982;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the polling place shall be in
the Board Room of the Municipal Building,170 MacGregor Avenue,
Town of Estes Park,Colorado,that the polls shall be open from
7:00 A.M.to 7:00 P.M.on said election day.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that voting machines shall be used
in the municipal election and that the Town Clerk be and she is
hereby authorized and directed to perform all acts and functions
necessary for the use of such voting machines as required by the
laws of the State of Colorado pertaining thereto.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the judges of election appointed
by the Town Clerk shall receive for their services the sum of
fiCty dollars ($50.00).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be authorized
to give notice of the election by publication as provided by law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Town Clerk shall at the
expense of the Town arrange for such materials and supplies for
such election as may be necessary.
Adopted:February 23,1982
6—82
C)
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 15-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLORADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31—12—107 (1)(g),C.R.S.1973,as
amended,hereby states its intention to annex the area described
herein.The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the petition
is in substantial compliance with Section 31-12—107 (1)(q),C.R.S.
1973,as amended.The Board of Trustees further finds and determines
that the petition is signed by the landowners of more than fifty
percent (50%)of the area to be annexed,excluding public streets
and alleys.Such area,as annexed,will be known as “Fall River
Estates First Addition”to the Town of Estes Park,Colorado.Such
area is described as follows:
FALL RIVER ESTATES FIRST ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park.Colorado.a portion of the East
1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22.15N.R73U of the 6th P.M..being more particularly
described as follows:
Com—encing at the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 22 as monumented by a brass capped pipe.
with all bearings relative to the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 considered
as bearing NO1O5’OO’E
thence NO105’OO’E a distance of 1080.35 feet along the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of
said Section 22 to a point on the Northerly right—of—way line of U.S.Highway No.34:
thence the fo]lowing five courses and distances along said Northerly right—of—way line of
U.S.Highway No.34:
thence N29’4853’W a distance of 4.50 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete;
thence N2945Of’W a distance of 246.09 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete;
thence N2949’I3’W a distance of 298.92 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete:
thence N15’55’50’W a distance of 245.46 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in concrete:
thence NQ2’50’29’W a distance of 556.16 feet to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap
in rock:
thence leaving said Northerly right—of-way line S17’05’32’W a distance of 290.93 feet
to a Colorado Dept.of Highways brass cap in concrete on the Southerly right—of—way
line of U.S.Highway No.34;
thence the following three courses and distances a]ong said Southerly right—of—way line of
U.S.Highway No.34:
thence S02’40’18E a distance of 281.81 feet:
thence 295.14 feet along the arc of a non—tangent curve to the left,said curve has a
delta angle of 2708’36’.a radius of 623.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which
bears S15’55’50’E a distance of 292.39 feet:
thence 52947’36’E a distance of 659.24 feet:
thence leaving said Southerly right—of—way line a distance of 113.52 feet along the arc
of a non-tangent curve concave to the Southeast,said curve has a delta angle of
?4’05’24’,a radius of 270.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S48’02’42W
a distance of 112.69 feet;
thence S3600OOW a distance of 110.57 feet:
thence 110.66 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve has a de]ta angle of
70’OO’OO’,a radius of 90.58 feet and is subtended by a chord which beats S01’00O0’W
a distance of 103.91 feet;
thence 206.68 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta angle of
3100’00.a radius of 382.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S18’30’0O’E
a distance of 204.17 feet:
3—82
o
thence SO3’00’0OE a distance of 45.00 feet;
thence 179.59 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta angle of
21’OO’OO,a radius of 490.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S07’30’00W
a distance of 178.59 feet;
thence 165.81 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve has a delta angle of
10O0O’00.a radius of 95.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S68’OO’OO’W
a distance of 145.55 feet;
thence S28’OO’OOW a distance of 205.68 feet;
thence S0200’00W a distance of 98.62 feet to a point on the South line of the East 1/2
of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22
thence SB9’04’00E a distance of 305.15 feet along the South line of the East 1/2 of the
Northwest 1/4 of said Section 22 to the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 22 and the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described tract of land contains 6.547 acres.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That in accordance with Section 31—
12-108 C.R.S.1973,as amended,a public hearing shall be held
on April 13,1982 at 7:30 p.m.,in the Municipal Building,located
at 170 MacGregor Avenue,Estes Park,Colorado,for the purpose
of determining if the proposed annexation meets with the relevant
provisions of Sections 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.R.S.1973,as
amended.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED,That the Town Clerk shall give the
notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31—12-108 (2),C.R.S.
1973,as amended.
Dated this 23rd day of February ,1982.
C C
RESOLUTION 14-82
WHEREAS,the Estes Park General Improvement Sewer
District No.1 has been dissolved by ordinance;and
WHEREAS,the agreement between the Town and The
Estes Park Sanitation District provides for the transfer
of the main sewer line extension,any other collector
sewer lines,and all other facilities and easements of the
District to The Estes Park Sanitation District;and
WHEREAS,the Town has determined that said property
should be transferred to The Estes Park Sanitation District.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees
of the Town of Estes Park,that:
1.Upon filing of the certified copy of the ordinance
dissolving the Estes Park General Improvement Sewer District
No.1 with the Clerk and Recorder of Larimer County,Colorado,
that the Town transfer all of its right,title and interest
into the main sewer extension line,all other collector
sewer lines,all easements,and any other facility owned by
the Estes Park General Improvement Sewer District No.1 to
The Estes Park Sanitation District.
2.The appropriate officials of the Town of Estes
Park are hereby authorized to execute any documents necessary
to accomplish said transfer.
APPROVED:
//
Maybr
ATTEST:
4J2/U4JJiL(J
Town 9/erk
Adopted:February 23,1982
.4—82
RESOLUTION 13-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOAPD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
sign the agreement between the Town of Estes Park and Larimer County
regarding library services to rural residents during 1982.
Adopted:February 9,1982
3—82
0 0
R E S 0 1 U T I 0 N 12-22
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
sign the agreements between the Town of Estes Park and Northern Colorado
Quarterhorse Association for performances at Stanley Park September
4 -6,1982,and the Rocky Mountain Paint Horse Association for performances
at Stanley Park during August 13 -15,1982.
Adopted:February 9,1982
12—82
n 0
RESOLUTION 11-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park and
Walter Alsbaugh for rodeo performances at Stanley Park during
July 21 —24,1982.
Adopted:January 26,1982
1—82
0 0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 10 -82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park and the
National Old Time Fiddlers Association for performances at Stanley
Park during August 25 -22,1982.
Adopted:January 26,1982
)—82
0 0
RESOLUTION 9-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
sign the 1982 Advertising Agreement by and between the Town of
Estes Park and the Estes Park Area Chamber of Commerce.
Adopted:January 26,1982
—82
RE SQL UT ID N 8 -82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park
and Mountain and Plains Appaloosa Horse Club for performances
at Stanley Park in 1982,1983 and 1984.
Adopted:January 12,1982
—82
7-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement by and between the Town of Estes Park
and Larimer County regarding leasing of rooms in the Municipal
Building beginning January 1,1982.
Adopted:January 12,1982
‘—82
0 0
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 6 -82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the filinq date of the application for a 3.2%retail
beer license filed by Philip J.and Christine E.Switzer dba
East Side Food Store to be located at 381 South Saint Vram
Avenue,Estes Park,Colorado,is January 12,1982,and it is
hereby ordered that a public hearing on said application shall
be held in the Board Room of the r4unicipal Building,170 MacGregor
Avenue,on February 23,1982 at 7:30 p.m.,and that the neighbor
hood boundaries for the purpose of said application and hearing
shall be the area included within a radius of 3.07 miles as
measured from the center of the applicants’property.
Adopted:January 12,1982
—82
0 0
RESOLUTION 5-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,
COLORADO:
That the filing date of the application for a new massaqe parlor
license filed by Patricia W.De Fries and Adel Parker dba Estes Park
Holistic Health Center to be located at 405 West Elkhorn Avenue,Estes
Park,Colorado,is January 12,1982,and it is hereby ordered that a
public hearing on said application shall be held in the Board Room of
the Municipal Building,170 MacGregor Avenue,on February 23,1982 at
7:30 p.m.,and that the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of said
application and hearing shall be the area included within a radius of
2.19 miles as measured from the center of the applicants’property.
Adopted:January 12,1982
—P2
C 0
RE SQL UT ION 4-82
WHEREAS,an Application for a Planned Unit Development,
Prospect Mountain Subdivision -a P.U.D.,1st Filing,was filed
on the 24th day of November,1981;and
WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park
held a public hearing and considered the proposed Prospect
Mountain Subdivision -a P.U.D.,1st Filing Application,Site
Plan and Subdivision Plat on January 12,1982.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
1.The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the
Application,together with all supporting documents,are in
substantial compliance with the requirements of Chapter 17.60
of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado;
that the applicants have substantially complied with the provisions
of said ordinance;and that said Planned Unit Development is
in general conformity with the Master Plan of the Town.
2.The Board further finds and determines that pursuant
to said ordinance and the laws of the State of Colorado,all
notices,publications and public hearings have been given,
made and held with respect to said Application.
3.Prospect Mountain Subdivision -a P.U.D.,1st Filing
is hereby approved and that the Mayor and Town Clerk are authorized
and directed to sign the plat.
Adopted:January 12,1982
4—82
C
PESOLUTION NO.3 -82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES
PARK,COLOPADO:
The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park,Colorado,
in accordance with Section 31—12—110,C.R..S.1973,as amended,
hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the
followinq described area that the requirements of the applicable
parts of Sections 31—12—104 and 31—12—105,C.B.S.1973,as
amended,have been met;that an election is not required under
Section 31—12—107 (2),C.B.S.1973,as amended;and that no
additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the
annexation.The area eligible for annexation as “PROSPECT
ESTATES ADDITION”to the Town of Estes Park is as follows:
A portion of the SE 1/4 of Section 36,T5N,P73W of the 6th
P.M.and the SW 1/4 of Section 31,T5N,P72W of the 6th
P.M.,being more particularly described as follows:
Beqinning at the F 1/4 corner of said Section 36 as
monumented by a U.S.G.L.O.brass capped pipe;thence S
01001137??W 1271.48 feet;thence S 89°22’53”F 1066.34 feet;
thence S 4101610711 W 27.71 feet;thence S 89°22’53”F 278.01
feet;thence S 00°15’OO”E 30.00 feet to the SW 1/16 corner
of said Section 31 as monumented by a brass bolt in
concrete;thence N 89°22’53”W 383.30 feet;thence N
41°l6’07”E 1.32 feet;thence N 89°22’53”W 944.66 feet;
thence S 0l00lI37 W 557.01 feet;thence S 80°24’08 W 326.47
feet;thence along a curve concave to the north having a.
radius of 507.5 feet and a central angle of 37°38’for a
distance of 333.34 feet;thence N 6l057?52 W 91.5 feet;
thence 5 01001140??W 554.43 feet;thence N 88°52’W 273.6
feet;thence S 01001?W 238.82 feet to the township line
common to T5N and T4N;thence along the township line N
88°52’W 1655.33 feet to the S 1/4 corner of Section 36 as
monumented by a U.S.G.L.O.brass capped pipe;thence N
01°05’38”E 971.73 feet;thence along a non tangent curve
concave to the south with a radius of 746.3 feet and a
central angle of 07°49’42”for a distance of 101.97 feet,
resultant chord being N 85059147?!F 101.89 feet;thence due
north 78.64 feet;thence due west 100.00 feet;thence N
0l005?38?F 1559.61 feet;thence S 89°28’16”E 2652.37 feet
to the Point of Beginning.
All hearinqs herein are relative to the South line of said
SE 1/4 being N 88°52’W.
D?TED this 12th day of January,1982.
Mayor -
ATTEST:
-82
0
RESOLUTION 2-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the water extension agreement dated January 12,1982
by and between the Town of Estes Park and R.V.Water &Roads,
Inc.
Adopted:January 12,1982
2—82
C
RESOLUTION 1-82
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
ESTES PARK,COLORADO:
That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to sign the agreement dated January 12,1982 by and between the
Town of Estes Park and R.V.Water &Roads,Inc.regarding
the installation of the water system to serve Range View Subdivision.
Adopted:January 12,1982
1—82