Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Park Board of Adjustment 1967-10-31Co RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Board of Adjustment October 31,1967 Coimnittee:Chairman Dannels;Members Harry Tregent,N.T. Petrocine,Rollen Sutter and Ed Palmer. Attending:Chairman Dannels;Members Harry Tregent,N.T. Petrocine,Rollen Sutter and Ed Palmer. Also Attending:Building Inspector Ted Hackett and Town Clerk Dale G.Hill Absent:None Mr.Pat Ash,owner of lots 15,16 and 17,block 2,Town of Estes Park appeared before the Board of Adjustment because the Town Building Inspec tor,Mr.Ted Hackett refused a building permit for the above described property.Building Inspector Hackett refused the permit because the addition required would violate the municipal code of the Town of Estes Park in that the addition would not conform to the setback regulation as required and a portion of the addition would be constructed in the street right of way.Mr.Ash requested the Board of Adjustment grant him a variance to construct a decorative roof that would extend 3k”to 4U beyond the existing west side of the building.Mr.Ash stated there would be no structural changes made in the building. Building Inspector Hackett explained the location of the above mentioned building in regard to the existing street right of way.A plat drawn by Paul Van Horn showing location of the above mentioned building in relation to the street right of way is attached to and made a part of these minutes.Mr.Hackett explained the plat to the Board of Adjustment. Board Member Harry Tregent moved the requested variance not be granted. Board Member Rollen Sutter seconded the motion.Upon roll call the motion lost by the following votes:Those voting “Yes”Members Tregent and Sutter.Those voting “No”Members Dannels and Palmer. Board Member N.T.Petrocine arrived and took his place on the Board of Adjustment at this point in the meeting.Mr.Pat Ash reviewed his request for the variance.Building Inspector Hackett reviewed the location of the building and the request for the variance.Board Member Tregent moved that the variance not be granted.Board Member Sutter seconded the motion and upon roll call the motion lost by the following votes:Those voting “Yes”members Tregent and Sutter.Those voting “No”Members Dannels, Palmer and Petrocine. Board Chi7man Dannels moved the requested variance be granted.Board Member seconded the motion and the followingvote was recorded: Those voting “Yes”Members Dannels,Petrocine and Palmer.Those voting “No”Members Tregent and Sutter.Board Chairman Dannels declared the variance not granted because State Statuates(l39-60-7)required that the concurring vote of four members of the board shall be necessary to reverse any order,requirement,decision or determination of any such administrative official,or to decide in favor of the applicant any matter upon which it is required to pass under any such ordinance or to effect any variation in such ordinance.Every decision of such board shall,however,be subject to re view by certiorari.Such appeal may be taken by any person aggrieved or by an officer,department,board or bureau of the municipality. There being no further business,the meeting adjourned. r NOV 131967 1 ale .Hill,Town Clerk TUiN liE ES ?