Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 2020-08-11(Instructions continued on page 2, Agenda begins on page 2) The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to provide high-quality, reliable services for the benefit of our citizens, guests, and employees, while being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. The Town of Estes Park will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town services, programs, and activities and special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call (970) 577-4777. TDD available. BOARD OF TRUSTEES – TOWN OF ESTES PARK TO BE HELD VIRTUALLY Tuesday, August 11, 2020 7:00 p.m. Board Room – 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 The Town Board of Trustees will participate in the meeting remotely due to the Declaration of Emergency signed by Town Administrator Machalek on March 19, 2020 related to COVID-19 and provided for with the adoption of Ordinance 04-20 on March 18, 2020. Procedures for quasi-judicial virtual public hearings are established through Emergency Rule 06-20 signed by Town Administrator Machalek on May 8, 2020 and outlined below. ADVANCED PUBLIC COMMENT Options for the Public to Provide Public Input: 1.By Public Comment Form: Members of the public may provide written public comment on a specific agenda item by completing the Public Comment form found at https://dms.estes.org/forms/TownBoardPublicComment. The form must be submitted by 12:00 p.m., Tuesday, August 11, 2020. All comments will be provided to the Board for consideration during the agenda item and added to the final packet. 2. By Telephone Message: Members of the public may provide public comment or comment on a specific agenda item by calling (970) 577-4777. The calls must be received by 12:00 p.m., Tuesday, August 11, 2020. All calls will be transcribed and provided to the Board for consideration during the agenda item and added to the final packet. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DURING BOARD MEETING Options for participation in the meeting will be available by call-in telephone option or online via Zoom Webinar which will be moderated by the Town Clerk’s Office. CALL-IN (TELEPHONE OPTION): Dial public participation phone number, 1-346-248-7799 Enter the Meeting ID for the August 11, 2020 meeting: 982 1690 2040 followed by the pound sign (#). The meeting will be available beginning at 6:30 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please call into the meeting prior to 7:00 p.m., if possible. You can also find this information for participating by phone on the website at www.estes.org/boardsandmeetings by clicking on “Virtual Town Board Meeting Participation”. Request to Speak: For public comment, the Mayor will ask attendees to indicate if they would like to speak – phone participants will need to press *9 to “raise hand”. Staff will be moderating the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Board. Once you are announced by phone: State your name and address for the record. DO NOT watch/stream the meeting at the same time due to streaming delay and possible audio interference. Prepared 07-31-2020 *Revised Page 1 NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (ONLINE): Individuals who wish to address the Board via virtual public participation can do so through Zoom Webinar at https//zoom.us/j//98216902040 – Zoom Webinar ID: 982-1690-2040. The Zoom Webinar link and instructions are also available at www.estes.org/boardsandmeetings by clicking on “Virtual Town Board Meeting Participation”. Individuals participating in the Zoom session should also watch the meeting through that site, and not via the website, due to the streaming delay and possible audio interference. Start Time: The Zoom Webinar will be available beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Participants wanting to ensure their equipment setup is working should join prior to the start of the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Request to Speak: For public comments, the Mayor will ask attendees to click the “Raise Hand” button to indicate you would like to speak at that time. Staff will moderate the Zoom session to ensure all participants have an opportunity to address the Board. You will experience a short delay prior to re-connecting with the ability to speak. State your name and address for the record. In order to participate, you must: Have an internet-enabled smartphone, laptop or computer. o Using earphones with a microphone will greatly improve your audio experience. Join the Zoom Webinar. o The link can be found above. Click “Participate Virtually in the Regular Town Board Meeting of the Board of Trustees”. DO NOT watch/stream the meeting via the website at the same time due to delays and possible feedback issues. WATCH THE MEETING: The Town Board meetings will be livestreamed at www.estes.org/videos and will be posted within 48 hours of the meeting at the same location. Documents to Share: If individuals wish to present a document or presentation to the Board, material must be emailed by Monday, August 10, 2020 by 8:00 a.m. to the Town Clerk’s office at townclerk@estes.org. Quasi-Judicial Proceedings (Quasi-Judicial items will be marked as such) Written Testimony Must be submitted by mail to Town Clerk, PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 or by completing the Public Comment form at https://dms.estes.org/forms/TownBoardPublicComment. Members of the public may provide public comment or comment on a specific agenda item by calling (970) 577-4777. All calls must be received by 8:00 a.m., Monday, August 10, 2020. All comments received will be provided to the Board and included in the final packet material. Oral Testimony To ensure your ability to provide comments during the meeting, you must register by emailing townclerk@estes.org or calling (970) 577-4777 by Monday, August 10, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. During the meeting, any individual who did not register to speak on a quasi-judicial item may join public participation by following either the Call-In or Online option previously mentioned. Individuals who do not register prior to the meeting risk being unable to testify due to administrative/technical difficulty during the meeting. Written presentation materials or exhibits must be delivered to townclerk@estes.org by 8:00 a.m. Monday, August 10, 2020 in order to be presented during the meeting. No other written presentations or exhibits will be accepted during oral testimony by any member of the public. Packet Material The packet material can be accessed through the following link: Town Board Packet or under the Town Board section at www.estes.org/boardsandmeetings or you may request a paper packet by emailing townclerk@estes.org or calling (970) 577-4777. Page 2 NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. AGENDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES – TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, August 11, 2020 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. (Any person desiring to participate, please join the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance). AGENDA APPROVAL. PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address). TOWN BOARD COMMENTS / LIAISON REPORTS. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Bills. 2. Town Board Minutes dated July 28, 2020 and Town Board Study Session Minutes dated July 28, 2020. 3. Estes Park Board of Adjustment minutes dated June 2, 2020 (Acknowledgement only). 4. Revised Policy 101 Division of Responsibilities – Revise appointments with the appointment of Trustee Webermeier. 5. Revised Policy 306 Leave - Amending Holidays Observed and Floating Holidays. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff for Town Board Final Action. 1. ACTION ITEMS: Following items are quasi-judicial, see procedures for public comment. A. RESOLUTION 53-20 ELKHORN LODGE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT, 600 WEST ELKHORN AVENUE, ZAHOUREK CONSERVANCY, LLC, OWNER, EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A TEXAS LLC, C/O JUSTIN MABEY, APPLICANT. (Quasi-Judicial) Planner Woeber. Applicant requests approval of a final plat for a 13 lot subdivision, with lots ranging from 0.276 to 3.291 acres in size. The subdivision is associated with the Elkhorn Lodge PUD. B. RESOLUTION 54-20 ELKHORN LODGE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), 600 WEST ELKHORN AVENUE, ZAHOUREK CONSERVANCY, LLC, OWNER, EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A TEXAS LLC, C/O JUSTIN MABEY, APPLICANT. (Quasi-Judicial) Planner Woeber. Applicant requests approval of a Final PUD Plan on 13 lots, currently within the CO (Outlying Commercial) Zoning District, proposing various commercial, accommodations, and residential uses. REPORT AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON OPEN CONTAINERS. Assistant Town Administrator Damweber. Continue discussion from July 14, 2020 regarding the possibility of changing existing open container regulations. ADJOURN. Prepared 07-31-2020 *Revised Page 3 Page 4 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 28, 2020 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall and Virtually in said Town of Estes Park on the 28th day of July, 2020. Present: Wendy Koenig, Mayor Patrick Martchink, Mayor Pro Tem Trustees Carlie Bangs Marie Cenac Barbara MacAlpine Cindy Younglund Scott Webermeier Also Present: Travis Machalek, Town Administrator Jason Damweber, Assistant Town Administrator Dan Kramer, Town Attorney Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Absent: None Mayor Koenig called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. and all desiring to do so, recited the Pledge of Allegiance. SWEARING-IN CEREMONY FOR APPOINTED TRUSTEE. Judge Ablao conducted a swearing in ceremony virtually for newly appointed Trustee Scott Webermeier completing the term of Trustee Ken Zornes. AGENDA APPROVAL. It was moved and seconded (Martchink/Cenac) to approve the Agenda as presented, and it passed unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS. None. TRUSTEE COMMENTS. Trustee Younglund commented the Police Auxiliary continues their efforts to pick up trash throughout the community. Trustee MacAlpine stated she attended her first Board of Appeals in July. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. Town Administrator Machalek provided a policy governance monitoring report for Policy 3.3, 3.12 and 3.13 and reported compliance. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Bills. 2. Town Board Minutes dated July 14, 2020 and Town Board Study Session Minutes dated July 14, 2020. 3. Board of Appeals Minutes dated August 29, 2019. (Acknowledgement only). 4. Family Advisory Minutes dated March 5, 2020. (Acknowledgement only). 5. Three Year Extension with Hays Companies, Inc., for Employee Benefit Services, $29,000 annually – Pending Budget Appropriations. 6. Resolution 47-20 Approving the Second Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Funding and Coordination of a Joint Compensation StudyDRAFT Page 5 Board of Trustees – July 28, 2020 – Page 2 between Platte River Power Authority, Fort Collins, Longmont, Loveland and Estes Park. 7. Resolution 48-20 Water Supply Agreement with Gunter and Gloria Preuss of Saddle Notch Ranch. 8. Resolution 49-20 Intergovernmental Agreement with Colorado Department of Human Services authorizing participation in the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LEAP). 9. Acceptance of Town Administrator Policy Governance Monitoring Report. It was moved and seconded (Bangs/MacAlpine) to approve the Consent Agenda, and it passed unanimously. 2. REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: (Outside Entities). 1. LARIMER COUNTY OPEN LANDS ADVISORY BOARD UPDATE. Daylan Figgs/Larimer County Natural Resources Director provided a quarterly update on the open land activities. In 2020, staff has seen a significant increase in day use of open spaces, and Hermit Park has experienced a significant increase in visitation and hitting capacity on trailheads. The department continues to work on a strategic plan and would present the results to the Town Board once completed later in the fall. He stated the department partners with the Estes Valley Land Trust on potential conservation easements, committed funds towards the Fall River Trail, funding for the Estes Valley Open Space and Recreation Plan, treatment of weeds on Town properties and contributed funds to the Estes Land Stewardship Association for the printing of weed booklets. The department continues to implement phases of the adopted management plan for Hermit Park, including relocation of two cabins, relocating the Homestead Meadow Trail and new outdoor education and day use area at the Hermit’s Cabin. NoCoPlaces 2050, a regional collaborative includes eight land management agencies, was formed to work to protect and conserve natural and cultural resources while providing equitable access and quality recreation experiences for current and future generations with a 30-year time horizon. The 2019 annual report highlights the work completed each year and the investment in the open lands in Larimer County. 2. COVID-19 SAFETY EFFORTS AND OUTREACH. Town Administrator Machalek provided an overview of the safety and outreach efforts to date the Town and its partners have taken regarding COVID-19, including administration of the Estes Valley Resiliency Collaborative (EVRC), “Welcome Back” campaign focused on wearing masks, maintaining distance and handwashing, development of the Estes Valley Safe & Strong Resiliency Plan, use of digital messaging signs, Police educating and enforcement support for Larimer County mask order, implementation of the “Embrace the Views” outdoor expansion program, consideration of open container options for public spaces, consideration of “Stay Healthy Streets” proposal, co-host two virtual “Town Halls”, host webinars for the public, participation in regional collaborative groups, CSU wastewater testing program, and other collaborative messaging efforts such as “Keep NoCo Open”. The Estes Chamber of Commerce survey indicated the businesses (68%) prefer the Town align with Governor Polis’ guidance, masks required indoors and while waiting outdoors for certain transportation operations, rather than renewing the Town’s ordinance to require masks in the downtown core. Tom Gonzales/Larimer County Public Health Director provided an update on the status of COVID-19 in the county. He stated the county has seen an increase in positive cases in July and reached a threshold of more than 25 cases in a 14-day period for three days or more. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment notified Larimer County Public Health of the potential loss of the approved variance, which allowed the county to open earlier with additional capacity for businesses such as restaurants. A mitigation plan was submitted and approved by the State without modifications, including additional staffing, both aDRAFT Page 6 Board of Trustees – July 28, 2020 – Page 3 LatinX outreach coordinator and additional bilingual contact tracers, to address the vulnerable population, increase community wide testing, and increase enforcement efforts through cooperative efforts with local jurisdictions. Staff continues to work with CSU, Fort Collins and Estes Park on viral loads within wastewater as a method for determining the virus within the communities. Director Gonzales reinforced the need for face coverings which have scientifically proven to decrease the spread of the virus when social distancing cannot be maintained. Estes Park saw 13 new cases during the month of July, with a total of 21 case throughout the entire pandemic to date. He stated a majority of the cases were due to travel by Estes Park residents. The super spreaders of the virus are the 20-35-year-old who are mostly asymptomatic and don’t require hospitalization. Board comments and questions have been summarized with a response by Director Gonzales and Community Relations and Public Information Supervisor Katie O’Donnell: Questioned what consists of a large gathering and if allowing open containers in Town parks would be a concern. A group of 50 or more people. Outdoor without a mask provides a lower risk of spreading the virus, however, he would encourage physical distancing and refrain from mingling within the parks. Questioned if any of the known cases were from outdoor exposure. The County Health department has linked five cases to outdoor events where there was no social distancing. Would walking downtown on the sidewalks be a concern? The risk would be lower. Questioned if variations on the current plans to open schools have been established and would contact tracing be implemented. Contact tracers have been assigned to each school district and variations of the plans have been developed. Direct contact would be used when determining who would be required to be quarantined and would not require parents to quarantine if a student has been exposed directly. Questioned if requiring face covering outdoors would develop a norm and address the clumping together of people in small areas downtown. The department continues to work with local businesses on requiring face covering when waiting in line to enter and reviewing areas outdoors that are particularly congested. Studies have shown an increase in droplets with exercise, signing, spitting, etc. and with colder and drier air which allows the droplets to remain airborne for a longer period of time. Businesses are closed when there are two or more employees which test positive to allow for the full cleaning of the business. 3. LIQUOR ITEMS: 1. NEW HOTEL & RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BLACK CANYON CATERING, INC., DBA THE BOULDERS, 800 MACGREGOR AVENUE, SUITE 243 ESTES PARK, CO 80517. (Quasi-Judicial) Mayor Koenig opened the public hearing. Town Clerk Williamson reviewed the application for a new Hotel and Restaurant liquor license filed by the Black Canyon Catering Inc. dba The Boulders. She stated all paperwork and fees had been submitted. The applicant was approved for a new liquor license for The Homestead earlier in the year to operate a wedding facility at the old Twin Owls Restaurant location on the property. This newly constructed wedding facility would provide a second option on the property owned and operated by the applicants. Mayor Koenig closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Cenac/Webermeier) to approve a Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License for the Black Canyon Catering Inc. dba The Boulders, 800 MacGregor Avenue, Suite 243, and it passed unanimously. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: 1. ACTION ITEMS: A. RESOLUTION 50-20, AMENDED PLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, BLOCK 1, OF THE SECOND AMENDED PLAT, 215 PARK LANE, THOMAS BECK, TW BECK ARCHITECTS OWNER/APPLICANT. (Quasi- Judicial) Mayor Koenig opened the public hearing. Planner Woeber stated the request would rearrange internal lot lines within the 1908 platted subdivision. The request would combine three lots, each approximately 25 feet by 160 feetDRAFT Page 7 Board of Trustees – July 28, 2020 – Page 4 in depth, into two lots, Lot 6A (0.074 acre) and Lot 7A (0.095 acre), to legally locate a current commercial building containing offices and demolish current structures and redevelop Lot 6A into multi-family residential use, a use-by-right in the CD – Commercial Downtown zoning district. The Estes Park Planning Commission unanimously approved the request at their June 16, 2020 meeting. Thomas Beck/Applicant stated the old garage and cabin on Lot 6A have been demoed and the property would be used for parking for the commercial office building on Lot 7A in the interim. Mayor Koenig closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (MacAlpine/Cenac) to approve Resolution 50- 20, and it passed unanimously. 5. ACTION ITEMS: 1. RESOLUTION 51-20, 3RD AMENDED LAKEVIEW PLAZA CONDOMINIUMS, 1751 NORTH LAKE AVENUE 1A AND 1B, BRADFIELD PROPERTIES, LLC (GORDON AND ANNIE SLACK) AND JESSIE M FINCH/OWNERS. (Quasi- Judicial) Mayor Koenig opened the public hearing. Planner Woeber stated the amended plat would align the attic areas with the units of the Lakeview Plaza Condominiums to clearly outline the ownership of the seven units. The request would record an amendment to move the boundary line on the condominium map for Units 1A and 1B with no physical change to the structure, utilities, access, drainage, etc. Mayor Koenig closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Martchink/Younglund) to approve Resolution 51-20, and it passed unanimously. 2. RESOLUTION 52-20 PEAK VIEW APARTMENTS WATER TAP FEE INSTALLMENT LOAN AGREEMENT. Director Hudson presented the Board with a proposed installment loan agreement for water tap fees for the development of the Peak View Apartments by the Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA). The agreement provides the Authority with $14,000 in water tap subsidy from the General Fund; EPHA to pay a portion of the fees pending the final contractor bids and amount of the construction loan; and amortize the remaining water tap fee at a not to exceed amount of $187,863 with a 14-year loan at 1.75% interest, capitalize annually compounded interest for the first three years, and annual payments to begin in 2024 for a 10-year period. EPHA Director Hawf and former EPHA Director Kurelja thanked the Town and staff for the effort and support in working together to bring the needed housing project forward. It was moved and seconded (Bangs/MacAlpine) to approve Resolution 52-20, and it passed unanimously. 3. FEE WAIVER REQUEST, 1551 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN AVENUE, PEAK VIEW APARTMENTS, BUILDING DIVISION FEES, ESTES PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY (EPHA). Director Hunt presented a request by the EPHA to waive building permit and plan review fees, estimated at $18,974.71, to build the Peak View Apartments consisting of 26 units to provide workforce housing. The request if approved would waive 50% of the building permit and certificate of occupancy fees and 100% of the plan-review fees. At the July 14, 2020 meeting, the Board approved an amended contract with SafeBuilt, a contracting service providing building division services, to provide a 50% discount for building services provided for Town-owned projects. SafeBuilt extended the same discount to EPHA for permit and plan review fees. EPHA Director Hawf and former EPHA Director Kurelja thanked the Town and SafeBuilt for their support, and stated every dollar of funding aids the financing of the needed project. It was moved and seconded (Younglund/Cenac) to approve the fee waiver request as presented, with a not-to-exceed waiver authorization of $20,000 for the proposed project, and it passed unanimously. 4. INTERVIEW COMMITTEE FOR THE BOARD OF APPEALS. It was moved and seconded (Martchink/Webermeier) to approve the appointment of Trustees MacAlpine and Cenac to the Board of Appeals interview panel, and it passed unanimously.DRAFTPage 8 Board of Trustees – July 28, 2020 – Page 5 5. REQUEST TO ENTER INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION: It was moved and seconded (Koenig/Younglund) to approve entering into executive session for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators - Section 24-6-402(4}(e}, C.R.S. and for a conference with an attorney for the Board for the purposes of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions - Section 24-6-402(4}(b}, C.RS. - Regarding the potential for the Town to provide water service to the YMCA of the Rockies, and it passed unanimously. Mayor Koenig called a recess of the meeting at 9:10 p.m. and entered into Executive Session at 9:25 p.m. Mayor Koenig reconvened into regular session at 10:25 p.m. Whereupon Mayor Koenig adjourned the meeting at 10:27 p.m. Wendy Koenig, Mayor Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk DRAFTPage 9 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado July 28, 2020 Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the TOWN BOARD of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in the Board Room and Virtually in said Town of Estes Park on the 28th day of July, 2020. Board: Mayor Koenig, Mayor Pro Tem Martchink, Trustees Bangs, Cenac, MacAlpine, and Younglund Attending: Mayor Koenig, Mayor Pro Tem Martchink, Trustees Bangs, Cenac, MacAlpine, and Younglund Also Attending: Town Administrator Machalek, Assistant Town Administrator Damweber, Town Attorney Kramer and Recording Secretary Beers Absent: None Mayor Koenig called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. WESTERN HERITAGE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) REVIEW. Director Hinkle stated the MOU outlines the general duties and responsibilities between Western Heritage and the Town for Rooftop Rodeo and requested the Board provide feedback. Chair Purdy stated the agreement was formed in 2012 and provided background on responsibilities. Board comments have been summarized: whether Western Heritage has had an audit; who was the financial accountant; clarification of accounting on a cash basis referenced in the bylaws; whether the Town should appoint a member of the Board of Trustees to Western Heritage’s Board and concerns related to having a voting member on boards which the Town has a financial interest in; defining the events center to the arena area; clarification was requested on lodging for rodeo participants; the overall expense to the Town to hold the Rodeo each year; clarification on the royalty program; and whether there has been changes to the ticket revenue splits. The Board directed staff to review the MOU with the Town Attorney for clarifications and to incorporate the updated bylaws into an updated draft for Board review. FISH HATCHERY DISCUSSION. Assistant Town Administrator Damweber reviewed property characteristics and a history recap on development of the property. On March 10, 2020 the Board requested staff research cost estimates for the installation of water infrastructure necessary to accommodate development on the south side of the Fall River and identify topics for consideration by the Board about objectives of the site and potential trade-offs. Utilities Department staff estimated a cost of approximately $1,775,000 for the installation of water infrastructure to accommodate development on the south side of the Fall River. Staff requested Board input on: housing priorities, housing types, density, ownership, on-site amenities, preference for development on both sides of the Fall River, preservation of open space, lease or sale of property, and possible land swap. Board comments have been summarized: review feedback provided to the Town through community outreach; staff was directed to contact the Housing Authority for attainable housing interest; review the extension of the Fall River bike path which was proposed to go through the Fish Hatchery property; clarification on land swap options; on-site amenity options such as a childcare facility; loan amortization; the importance of continued public outreach; and Board interest in workforce housing and land swap possibilities. Trustees Bangs and MacAlpine stated their interest in sitting on a subcommittee or task force for the project. The Board directed staff to initiate a Request for Proposals with the new water infrastructure information, land swap options, loan amortization, mixed-density, and rental and ownership possibilities. DRAFTPage 10 Town Board Study Session – July 28, 2020 – Page 2 TRUSTEE & ADMINSTRATOR COMMENTS & QUESTIONS. None. FUTURE STUDY SESSION AGENDA ITEMS. Town Administrator Machalek requested and it was determined to remove the Vacation Home Regulation in Planned Unit Developments (PUD) from Items Approved – Unscheduled which would potentially be discussed during future PUD discussions depending on Board interest. Additionally, he requested the Partnership for Age Friendly Communities be discussed in coordination with the Comprehensive Plan. There being no further business, Mayor Koenig adjourned the meeting at 6:42 p.m. Bunny Victoria Beers, Recording Secretary DRAFTPage 11 Page 12 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Board of Adjustment June 2, 2020, 9:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Board: Chair Jeff Moreau, Vice Chair Wayne Newsom, Joe Holtzman Attending: Moreau, Newsom, Holtzman Also Attending: Director Randy Hunt, Senior Planner Jeff Woeber, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund, Town Board Liasion Barbara MacAlpine. Absent: none Chair Moreau called the Virtual meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. and introduced the Board Members and staff. 1.AGENDA APPROVAL It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Holtzman) to approve the agenda. The motion passed 3-0. 2.PUBLIC COMMENT None 3.CONSENT AGENDA Approval of minutes dated March 3, 2020 It was moved and seconded (Holtzman/Moreau) to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion passed 2-0 with Newsom abstaining 4.VARIANCE REQUEST, 1051 Fall River Lane, Owner: Rohrbaugh Properties, LLC Planner Woeber reviewed the variance request. The applicant proposed a 450 square foot addition to an existing office facility, with a rear yard setback of ten feet from the current 25 feet. This addition would provide a room for meetings and other gatherings. Staff recommended approval of the variance request. Board Discussion: Newsom stated he sees no adverse effect to any neighbors with this request and Moreau and Hotlzman agreed. Applicant Discussion: Joe Calvin noted that the addition will be used as a Hospitality room for meetings and small gatherings. There will be a sidewalk on the back and access to the main building will be staff only. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Holtzman) to approve the requested variance allowing a rear setback of no less than ten feet along the southwest, rear property line of the subject property at 1051 Fall River Court, Town of Estes Park, with findings and conclusions as outlined in the staff report. 5.REPORTS: Page 13 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Board of Adjustment 2 June 2, 2020 •Director Hunt suggested electing new officers at the next Board of Adjustment meeting. All members were in agreement. There being no other business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:21 a.m. ___________________________________ Jeff Moreau, Chair ___________________________________ Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary Page 14 TOWN CLERK Memo To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Date: August 11, 2020 RE: Policy 101 Division of Responsibilities - Revise to Remove the Larimer County Open Space Appointment. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER – Policy Revision QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: To revise Policy 101 Division of Responsibilities. Present Situation: After the swearing in of the Town Board at the April 28, 2020 meeting, the newly seated Board approved appointments to Boards, Commissions, and liaison positions through the adoption of Policy 101. Since the adoption of the appointments, Trustee Ken Zornes resigned from the Town Board effective June 30, 2020. The Board appointed Scott Webermeier at their July 28, 2020 meeting, and he was sworn-in by Assistant Municipal Judge Ablao to replace Zornes. These changes require a review of Policy 101 and appointments to Boards and Committees previously held by Trustee Zornes. Proposal: To revise Policy 101 with the following proposed appointments: Local Marketing District – Replace Mayor Koenig with Trustee Webermeier Larimer County Solid Waste Policy Council – Mayor Koenig Larimer County Behavioral Health Policy Council – Trustee Webermeier Advantages: To fill open appointments on the Boards and Commissions vacated by Trustee Zornes. Disadvantages: Board and Commissions would not have representation on certain Boards and Commissions. Page 15 Action Recommended: Approve the revisions to Policy 101. Budget: None. Level of Public Interest: Low Sample Motion: I approve/deny the revisions to Policy 101 as outlined. Attachments: 1. Revised Policy 101 with redlines. Page 16 Effective Period: Until Superseded  Review Schedule: After each municipal election  Revised: 06/0908/11/2020  Effective Date: 06/0908/11/2020  References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board   Appointed Committee Principles  TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE  BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES   101  Revisions 06/0908/11/2020  1.Purpose The Board of Trustees has many varied responsibilities. In order to effectively use their time, the Board finds it necessary to divide duties and responsibilities among the Board members. 2.Assignments To Ongoing Committees: At the first regular meeting following the certification of the results of each biennial election, the Board of Trustees determines each Board and Commission Primary Liaison assignments and responsibilities for the remainder of the term of the current standing Town Board. a.Interim Assignments:  Should the Board deem it necessary to create a new liaison assignment or to modify assignments at some time other than as described in 101.2, the Board may do so at any regular meeting of the Board. 3.Assignment To Committees Of The Board Of Trustees (committees comprised solely of members of the Board of Trustees) a)Assignments to Audit Committee: At the first regular meeting following the certification of the results of each biennial election, the Mayor shall appoint two (2) Trustees to the Audit committee with the Mayor serving as the third member. (Ord. 26-88 §1(part), 1988; Ord. 7-03 §1, 2003; Ord. 10-10 §1, 2010; Ord. 10-14 §1, 2014; Ord. 13-15, § 1, 9-22-2015) b)Assignment to Special Committees: Special committees may be established by the Board of Trustees. The Mayor shall  appoint all members of any special committee subject to the approval of the Board of  Trustees. (Estes Park Municipal Code 2.08.020) 4.Appointment of Mayor Pro‐ Tem:  “At its first meeting following the certification of the results of each biennial election, the Board of Trustees shall choose one (1) of the Trustees as Mayor Pro Tem who, in the absence of the Mayor from any meeting of the Board of Trustees, or during the Mayor's absence from the Town or his or her inability to act, shall perform his or her duties.” (Estes Park Municipal Code 2.16.010) Attachment 1 Page 17 Effective Period: Until Superseded  Review Schedule: After each municipal election  Revised: 06/0908/11/2020  Effective Date: 06/0908/11/2020  References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board   Appointed Committee Principles  TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE  BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES   101  Revisions 06/0908/11/2020  5.Special Assignments to Ad‐Hoc and Temporary Committees:  The Mayor may nominate trustees to serve on committees, community groups, or in some other capacities as a representative of the Town, except in cases where a Board Liaison has been approved by the Board of Trustees (Policy 1.7.)  The Mayor shall present the nomination of any such appointments to the Board for approval at a regular town board meeting.  The Mayor will make every effort to distribute special assignments equitably among the members of the Board. 6.Interview panels for Town Committees – In accordance with Section IV A 6 of Policy 102, Town Committees, “Applicants for all committees will be interviewed by the Town Board, or its designees. Any designees will be appointed by the full Town Board.” 7.Outside Committees – Outside committees are committees or boards where the Town is represented by a member of the Board of Trustees and/or staff.  These are not committees of the Town of Estes Park and therefore the rules and guidelines for membership are those of the outside entity not the Town.  At times, they may request that the Trustees assign an individual(s) to represent the Town, however they may also request a specific individual or position as the Town’s representative to the committee. 8.Liaison Assignments ‐ The Mayor may nominate trustees to serve as a Board Liaison. The Mayor shall present the nomination of any such appointments to the Board for approval at a regular town board meeting.  The Mayor will make every effort to distribute special assignments equitably among the members of the Board. 9.Special Consideration for Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) Board ‐ The Mayor or the Mayor's designee serves on the PRPA Board ex officio. The second PRPA Board appointment shall be approved by the Town Board, with preference for the Utility Director per PRPA Resolution 07‐19. Page 18 Effective Period: Until Superseded  Review Schedule: After each municipal election  Revised: 06/0908/11/2020  Effective Date: 06/0908/11/2020  References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board   Appointed Committee Principles  TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE  BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES   101  Revisions 06/0908/11/2020  Board Assignments    Mayor Pro‐Tem ‐ __ Trustee Martchink_____________  Board and Commission and Community Representation  Board, Commission or Task Force Liaison Staff Liaison Type of  Committee  Estes Park Planning Commission Trustee MacAlpine Randy Hunt  Advisory/ Decision  Making  Estes Park Board of Adjustment Trustee MacAlpine Randy Hunt Decision Making  Western Heritage Inc  Trustee Cenac n/a Outside  Estes Park Museum Friends and Foundation  Inc.  Derek Fortini Outside  Ambassadors Teri Salerno Outside  Police Auxiliary Trustee Younglund Wes Kufeld Working Group  Parks Advisory Board Trustee Cenac Brian Berg Advisory  Transportation Advisory Board Trustee Bangs  Greg Muhonen Advisory  Estes Valley Restorative Justice Trustee Bangs Denise Lord Working Group  Estes Park Board of Appeals Trustee MacAlpine Randy Hunt Advisory/Decision  Making  Sister Cities Trustee MacAlpine n/a Working Group  Family Advisory Board Trustee Younglund Jason Damweber Advisory  Page 19 Effective Period: Until Superseded  Review Schedule: After each municipal election  Revised: 06/0908/11/2020  Effective Date: 06/0908/11/2020  References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board   Appointed Committee Principles  TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE  BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES   101  Revisions 06/0908/11/2020  Committee or Board Appointed  Member(s)  Staff Liaison Type of  Committee  Audit Committee  Mayor Koenig  Mayor Pro Tem  Martchink   Trustee  MacAlpine  Travis Machalek  Duane Hudson  Advisory  Colorado Association of Ski Towns (CAST) Voting Designee  –Mayor Koenig Alt Designee TA Machalek n/a Outside  Platte River Power Authority Board of  Directors   Mayor Koenig Reuben Bergsten Outside   c  Estes Park Economic Development  Corporation Board of Directors  Trustee  Martchink & TA  Machalek  n/a Outside  Larimer County Solid Waste Policy Council Trustee  ZornesMayor  Koenig  Outside  Local Marketing District (Visit Estes Park) Mayor Koenig,  Trustee Cenac  Trustee  Webermeier  n/a Outside  Regional Transportation Infrastructure  Funding Task Force  Trustee  Martchink  Outside   Larimer County Behavioral Health Policy  Council  Trustee  ZornesWeberme ier  n/a Outside  ___________________________________  Page 20 Effective Period: Until Superseded  Review Schedule: After each municipal election  Revised: 06/0908/11/2020  Effective Date: 06/0908/11/2020  References: Governing Policies Manual; Governance Policy Manual 1.6 Board   Appointed Committee Principles  TOWN BOARD POLICY GOVERNANCE  BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES   101  Revisions 06/0908/11/2020  Wendy Koenig  Mayor  Page 21 Page 22 TOWN CLERK Memo To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Date: August 11, 2020 RE: Amending Policy 306 Leave PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER – Policy Revision QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: To amend Policy 306 Leave to align the Town with other Colorado municipalities with the number of holidays/floating holidays observed. Present Situation: The Town’s Executive Leadership Team formed a subcommittee consisting of Utilities Director Reuben Bergsten, Assistant Town Administrator Jason Damweber, Police Chief Wes Kufeld, Public Works Director Greg Muhonen, and Human Resources staff, HR Generalist Emily Lizotte and Town Clerk/Human Resources Director Jackie Williamson. The Retention and Recruitment Taskforce was charged with developing a plan to identify key areas of opportunity to assist in maintaining current staff and recruiting talent. Over the years, the Town has found it increasingly more difficult to maintain and recruit talent due to a number of factors such as the high cost of housing, lack of affordable childcare, competitive pay, etc. The taskforce, with the assistance of Graves Consulting, met on a regular base beginning in January 2020 through April/May 2020 and developed a plan to address key areas, including compensation, housing, child care and benefits with a goal of bringing forward items for the 2021 budget. With the ongoing pandemic, the taskforce plan will focus on bringing forward items in each key area that do not contain a significant financial impact to the 2021 budget, however address areas in which the Town can be more competitive in the market. One such area the Executive Leadership team has discussed are the number of holidays and floating holidays observed by the Town. Graves Consulting reviewed the Town’s leave policy and the leave policies of other Colorado municipalities and found the Town lags behind the average Colorado communities by two holidays, see table below for more details. The Town currently observes seven holidays and provides three floating holidays. The day after Thanksgiving has been discussed many times over the years because this is a time many people travel to see family, and is commonly Page 23 observed by other entities. It is also the day the Town sponsored Christmas parade occurs, requiring a number of staff members to drive floats and coordinate events during the day. Holidays Estes Park Holidays EC Government Majority New Year’s Day Yes Yes Martin Luther King Day No Yes President’s Day No Yes Memorial Day Yes Yes July 4th Yes Yes Labor Day Yes Yes Veteran’s Day No Yes Thanksgiving Yes Yes Thanksgiving Friday No Yes Christmas Eve Yes No Christmas Day Yes Yes Floating Holidays 3 2 TOTAL 10 12 Proposal: To revise Policy 306 Leave to officially recognize Martin Luther King Day as an official holiday in which Town Hall is closed, and provide an additional floating holiday (eight hours) in lieu of an official day off for the Friday following Thanksgiving. This would bring the Town in alignment with the number of holidays/floating holidays observed/provided by other Colorado municipalities. If approved, the Town would recognize the additional floating holiday (eight hours) in 2020 for the Friday after Thanksgiving. It is important to remember floating holidays are use it or lose it days/hours. Each employees floating holiday bank would be adjusted, and the leave would need to be used by the end of the year or forfeited. In 2021, the Town would recognize Martin Luther King Day, January 18, 2021 as an official holiday and provide each employee with four floating holidays (32 hours). Advantages: To bring the Town’s leave banks in alignment with other Colorado communities and make the Town competitive within the municipal market. Recognize Martin Luther King Day and provide leave for the day after Thanksgiving. Disadvantages: The Town would be closed to the public and the potential of a reduced workforce during the Christmas parade. Action Recommended: Approve the revisions to Policy 306 Leave. Budget: Cost of two additional holidays for all employees. Level of Public Interest: Low Page 24 Sample Motion: I approve/deny the amendments to Policy 306 Leave. Attachments: 1. Amended Policy 306 Leave with redlines. Page 25 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 1 of 16 Effective Period: Until superceded Review Schedule: Annually Effective Date: 06/0108/11/2020 References: Governing Policies Manual 3.2, 3.8 HUMAN RESOURCES 306 Leave 1. PURPOSE The Town recognizes and respects its employees’ need for leave time away from work. Such leave time is important in allowing employees to renew their physical and mental capabilities and remain productive. To this end, the Town strives to create and maintain a balanced work schedule for its employees by promoting quality of life through leave time. 2. POLICY In accordance with state and federal laws, the Town provides leave time to eligible employees as set forth in the following procedure. Leave accountability is the responsibility of the employee and the supervisor. 3. PROCEDURE a. Reporting Absences and Tardiness i. Expectations Employees are expected to report to their place of work every day as scheduled, unless on approved leave. Time off of any kind must be taken in accordance with this policy and other applicable Town policies. ii. Absent or Tardy Notifications Employees who will be absent or late to work must notify their immediate supervisor (or the supervisor’s designee) as soon as they learn of the need to be absent or late. Failure to provide prompt notice of an absence or tardiness is an unapproved absence and may result in disciplinary action. iii. Process for Reporting Absences or Tardiness Unless otherwise directed in written departmental work rules, employees must notify their immediate supervisor no later than fifteen (15) minutes after the start of the employee’s work shift if they will be absent or late. When notifying the supervisor of the need to be absent or late, the employee must report: 1) The reason for the absence (or tardiness). 2) The date (or time) when the employee expects to return to work. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 26 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 2 of 16 iv. Exceptional Circumstances The Town recognizes that under exceptional circumstances, neither the employee nor someone on his or her behalf may reasonably be able to call within the time required. In such a case, the employee or representative must contact the employee’s supervisor as soon as possible after the beginning of the shift. If the supervisor, at his or her discretion, believes the employee had a compelling reason which prevented the employee from obtaining prior approval for the absence, or from calling in on time, the supervisor may approve pay for the period of absence or tardiness. b. Vacation Leave i. Eligibility Vacation leave is accrued by all full-time, part-time employees and eligible contract employees. Vacation leave is pro-rated for part time employees (50% for 20-29 hour part-time employees, 75% for 30-39 hour part-time employees). ii. Amount of Hours Earned Vacation accrual begins upon initial date of hire and hours are earned for the first two pay periods of each month according to the schedule below. The date of initial hire does not change with changes in employment within the Town organization (i.e. promotions and transfers). However, if an employee leaves employment with the Town, the initial date of hire will change for the purposes of vacation accrual should the employee return to work for the Town. The amount of hours earned per pay period is pro-rated for eligible part-time employees. The maximum vacation leave carry over allowed is equal to double the amount of hours that can be earned in a year. An employee moves through the “Years of Service” brackets at the completion of the final year in the bracket. For example, an employee would move from the “0 through 3” bracket into the “4 through 7” bracket at the completion of the employee’s third year of service (36 months). Years of Service Hours Earned per Month Maximum Carry Over 0 through 3 8.00 192 Hours 4 through 7 10.00 240 Hours 8 through 15 12.00 288 Hours 16 or more 14.00 336 Hours iii. Amount of Hours Earned by At-Will Employees Years of Service Hours Earned per Month Maximum Carry Over 0 through 3 10.00 240 Hours 4 through 7 12.00 288 Hours 8 through 15 14.00 336 Hours 16 or more 16.00 384 Hours Page 27 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 3 of 16 iv. Authorization of Vacation Leave 1) Vacation leave shall be requested in advance and is granted at the discretion of each employee’s supervisor. 2)Requests for vacation leave may be deferred based upon workload. Supervisors and Department Directors shall ensure that every effort is made for the employee to use vacation leave requests previously cancelled due to department work load. v. Forfeiting of Vacation Leave 1) On the employee’s anniversary date (date of hire), they will forfeit any accrued vacation leave exceeding the maximum carry over articulated in Section 3.b.ii and 3.b.iii of this policy. 2) An employee may request reinstatement of forfeited accrued vacation leave of up to 80 hours for up to one (1) year from their anniversary date at the discretion of the Town Administrator. The request must justify why the employee was unable to use forfeited accrued vacation leave. All requests must be submitted within 30 days from the date accrued vacation leave was forfeited. Reinstated hours shall not be subject to payout if the employee terminates employment prior to their next anniversary date. vi. Use of Vacation Leave Vacation leave shall be taken in no less than one (1) hour increments. At no time may an employee have a negative vacation leave balance. vii. Separation of Employment Payout Upon separation of employment, an employee receives payment for all accrued vacation leave. The payment for accrued vacation will be based on the employee’s pay rate at the time of separation. This payment is taxed at the supplemental earnings rate c. Holiday Leave i. Eligibility Holiday leave is granted to all full-time, part-time employees and eligible contract employees. Holiday leave is pro-rated for part time employees (50% for 20-29 hour part-time employees, 75% for 30-39 hour part-time employees). ii. Holidays Observed Holiday leave is observed and granted for the following holidays: Nominal Date Holiday January 1st New Year’s Day January (Third Monday) Martin Luther King Day May (Last Monday) Memorial Day July 4th Independence Day Page 28 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 4 of 16 September (First Monday) Labor Day November (Fourth Thursday) Thanksgiving Day December 24th Christmas Eve Day December 25th Christmas Holidays that occur on a Saturday will be observed on the preceding Friday, and those that occur on a Sunday will be observed on the following Monday. If an employee is not normally scheduled to work on the day that a Town-observed holiday lands (i.e. a Friday for an employee working a 4/10 schedule), then such employee shall receive one additional eight (8) hour floating holiday. If an employee is normally scheduled to work on the day that a Town-observed holiday lands, and does not work the holiday, such employee receives eight (8) hours of holiday pay. iii. Use of Holiday Leave Holiday leave granted by the Town shall be used in the following manner: 1) Holidays must be taken unless the employee is scheduled to work by the employee’s supervisor. 2) Holidays which occur during an employee’s absence due to vacation or sickness shall not be counted as vacation or sick leave. 3) Employees, other than Department Directors and Police Department personnel, who are required to work on a holiday will receive pay for the hours worked as well as holiday pay. iv. Use of Holiday Leave – Police Department As the Police Department is required to be staffed on a 24/7/365 basis, Town- observed holidays will be handled by the Police Department as described below: 1) Non-exempt patrol personnel and non-exempt dispatch personnel will receive eight (8) hours of straight holiday pay for every holiday, regardless of whether the day is worked or not. These hours will not count towards overtime. 2) Non-exempt police personnel on an administrative schedule will receive eight (8) hours of holiday pay for each Town-observed holiday. These hours will count towards overtime. v. Floating Holidays In addition to the Town-observed holidays above, employees are allotted three four (43) floating holidays to be taken at their discretion, with supervisor approval. Floating holidays must be used during the year accrued or they will be forfeited on December 31st. Floating holidays are pro-rated for new employees. Floating Page 29 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 5 of 16 holidays are pro-rated for part-time employees (50% for 20-29 hour part-time employees, 75% for 30-39 hour part-time employees). d. Sick Leave i. Eligibility Sick leave is accrued by all full-time, part-time employees and eligible contract employees. Sick leave is pro-rated for part time employees (50% for 20-29 hour part-time employees, 75% for 30-39 hour part-time employees). ii. Amount of Hours Accrued Sick leave will be accrued at the rate of four (4) hours for the first two bi-weekly pay periods of each month (pro-rated for eligible part-time employees). Sick leave accumulation is capped at 480 hours. When any employee accumulates more than 480 hours of sick leave, all excess sick leave will be converted to vacation leave (on a two-for-one basis) on that employee’s anniversary date. iii. Use of Sick Leave Sick leave shall be used in the following manner: 1) Sick leave may only be used for: a. A non-occupational personal illness that renders an employee unable to perform their job. b. Non-occupational, necessary medical, optical, and dental health examinations and treatments, including reasonable travel time, when such appointments cannot be scheduled outside of regularly scheduled work hours. c. When an employee’s family member has a medical appointment or is ill and requires the care of the employee. For the purposes of this policy, “family member” is defined as an employee’s child, spouse, sibling, parent, grandparent, or grandchild, including natural, step, in-law, and foster relatives, regardless of whether or not said relative is living within the employee’s home. d. For a Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) qualifying event as outlined in Policy 311. e. For a single day, weather-related closure of Town facilities as determined by the Town Administrator. 2) Sick leave may not be used during a scheduled vacation or compensatory time off. 3) Employees who are eligible for holiday time and who are on sick leave during a designated holiday must record holiday time for that day and not Page 30 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 6 of 16 sick leave. An employee who is scheduled to work on a holiday and becomes sick must record holiday time only for the day. 4) During paid sick leave under the terms of this policy, all benefits will continue as though the employee were at work. 5) Sick leave shall be taken in no less than 30-minute increments. 6) At no time may an employee have a negative sick leave balance. 7) A Department Director may require an employee to take sick leave for any of the reasons specified in 306.3.d(iii)(1). 8) Employees are prohibited from using sick leave except under the circumstances described above. Employees who, in the Town’s judgment, misuse sick leave are subject to disciplinary action. When there appears to be a possibility that sick leave is being misused, the Department Director or supervisor may: a. Make further inquiry of the employee about past or ongoing use of the leave time. b. Require the employee to provide the type of information or submit to medical examinations as provided in the “Medical Certification” section of this policy (3.c.vi). c. Require the employee to provide written medical verification or be seen by the Town’s designated physician in order to use any further sick leave. iv. Notice of Brief Absence (3 days or less) This portion of the leave policy applies to non-occupational absences for brief illnesses, injuries, and minor medical procedures where the employee reasonably expects to be absent three (3) days or less, even if the absence ends up being longer. 1) Employees who need to use sick leave for an unexpected, brief illness or injury must contact their supervisor within 15 minutes after the beginning of the shift each day of the absence, or within a time frame set by the employees’ Department Director. 2) Employees who need to be absent for a scheduled medical procedure or short-term treatment must notify their supervisor as soon as the need for the absence is scheduled with the health care provider. v. Notice of Prolonged Absence (More than 3 Days) or Intermittent Leave This portion of the leave policy applies to employees who need to be absent for non-occupational illnesses or medical procedures for more than three days, or who Page 31 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 7 of 16 need to use sick leave intermittently. Employees seeking job protection under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) should refer to Policy 311. vi. Medical Certification 1) The Town reserves the right to require employees to substantiate and/or document their need for sick leave, whether it is based on their own physical condition or the condition of an immediate family member. 2) The Town reserves the right to evaluate requests for, and extensions of, sick leave by consulting with the physician of the employee, or with the Town’s own medical consultants, and retains the right to request that the employee seek a second opinion of the illness/disability from a physician of the Town’s choice. Employees who request sick leave, or who have used sick leave, may be required by their supervisor (in consultation with Human Resources) to provide written verification of the following from the physician or other health care provider treating the employee: a. Date on which the condition commenced; b. Nature and extent of illness or injury, but only as is necessary to determine the employee’s ability to perform job functions; c. Probable duration of illness or injury; d. Confirmation that the employee is unable to perform essential job functions; e. Anticipated date on which the employee may return to work; and/or f. Release stating that the employee is able to return and perform his or her duties without endangering the health and safety of himself/herself or others, and describing restrictions on the employee’s work activities. 3) Any illness or injury of an employee or an employee’s immediate family member requiring an employee to miss more than three (3) regularly scheduled work days may, at the discretion of the Department Director, require a physician’s statement verifying the condition of the person under the physician’s care. 4) At the end of any sick leave, the Town may require a physician’s statement verifying the employee’s fitness to return to work. vii. Payment upon separation A terminating employee that has completed 20 years of continuous service shall be compensated for fifty percent (50%) of their accumulated sick leave hours. Said Page 32 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 8 of 16 compensation will be computed at the employee’s rate of pay at time of termination. This payment is taxed at the supplemental earnings rate. e. Family and Medical Leave Act The Town of Estes Park complies with the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, as amended. The Town posts the mandatory FMLA Notice and, upon hire, provides all new employees with notices required by the United States Department of Labor (DOL) on Employee Rights and Responsibility under the Family and Medical Leave Act. For more details on the Town’s compliance with FMLA, please see Policy 311. f. Jury Duty and Witness Appearance Leave The Town recognizes jury duty as an important civic obligation. If called to report to jury duty or required to serve on a jury, an employee will be granted the necessary time required and will be compensated at his or her regular pay rate. i. Notification If an employee is served with a summons to jury duty, the employee must inform his or her supervisor by the next regular work day and provide a copy of their summons (in electronic format or otherwise). ii. Exempt Employee Compensation Exempt employees will receive their regular wages for regularly scheduled work hours for jury duty. iii. Non-Exempt Employee Compensation Non-exempt employees will receive their regular wages for regularly scheduled work hours during each of the first three days of jury duty served during regular work hours. Thereafter, any pay they receive for jury duty is paid by the governmental entity requesting the employee to participate in the jury service. iv. Compensation Requirements The Town has no obligation to pay wages for time spent on jury duty until and unless the employee’s supervisor verifies on the Court website that the employee was on jury duty during that period. v. Return to Work Employees are expected to return to work on any day or portion of a day they are released from jury duty as reasonable. vi. Witness Appearance Leave 1) Exempt employees will be paid during time they are subpoenaed or otherwise required by law to appear as a witness in any personal matter that overlaps with scheduled work time up to a maximum of two working days in any 12-month period. To receive this pay, the employee must pay to the Town any witness pay received by the employee, excluding mileage reimbursement. Any further time that an employee is required to appear as a witness is unpaid by the Town unless the employee chooses to use Page 33 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 9 of 16 accrued paid leave time. A matter is considered personal if, in the discretion of the supervisor, it is not directly related to the employee’s essential job functions. An employee’s appearance as a witness in non-personal matters is considered regular working time and will be compensated accordingly. 2) Non-exempt employees will be granted all necessary time off when required to appear as a witness in personal matters, but such time is unpaid by the Town unless the employee chooses to use accrued paid leave time. An employee’s appearance as a witness in non-personal matters is considered regular working time and will be compensated accordingly. g. Voting Leave i. Eligibility To qualify for voting leave, employees must: 1) Be a registered, eligible elector entitled to vote at an election. 2) Advise their manager of the leave of absence prior to the day of the election. 3) Have less than three (3) hours between the time the polls open and the time the polls close during which they are not required to be on the job for the Town. ii. Benefit Eligible employees shall be entitled to up to two hours off, with pay, for the purpose of voting on the day of the election during the time the polls are open. The Town may specify the hours during which the employee may be absent. h. Workers’ Compensation The Town complies with all applicable federal and state laws pertaining to Workers’ Compensation. Employees who are injured on the job may be eligible for leave time and other benefits. Any employee who suffers an occupational injury must report the injury to Human Resources and follow the incident reporting policy. Questions about workers’ compensation should be directed to Human Resources. i. Military Leave i. Eligibility All Town employees, regardless of employment category, are eligible to take military leave for active duty or active or inactive duty training if they are members of the reserves or enlisted in any branch of the United States Armed Forces, or are members of the National Guard of any state in the United States. Employees must present official documentation of the military duty prior to the leave and upon returning from leave. ii. Length of Paid Military Leave 1) Employees are provided with paid leave for a maximum of 15 working days (120 hours for full-time employees, pro-rated for less than full-time employees) per calendar year for active duty or active or inactive duty Page 34 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 10 of 16 training with the National Guard or any branch of the United States Armed Forces. If the intermittent schedule of a part-time employee makes it difficult to determine the number of hours the employee would have worked during the leave period for proration purposes, the number of hours the employee actually worked during the 21 calendar day immediately preceding the leave shall be used to calculate the maximum length of the paid military leave. 2) After exhausting the 15 days of paid military leave, an employee may choose to use accrued vacation time, compensatory time, accrued but unused holiday time, and/or take leave without pay for active duty or active or inactive duty training with the National Guard or any branch of the United States Armed Forces. If an employee chooses to use the above described accrued paid leave, such use must be at the rate of 40 hours per week (prorated for part-time employees based on their FTE) and can only be used during the initial portion of the leave. Once the leave becomes unpaid, and employee cannot begin using accrued paid leave. An employee may not use any other type of paid leave during military leave, including, but not limited to, sick leave or injury leave. iii. Continuation of Medical, Dental, and Vision Insurance 1) After the first 30 continuous calendar days of unpaid leave for active military service, the Town-sponsored medical, dental, and vision insurance for the employee and covered dependents will terminate. After coverage terminates, the employee may elect to continue coverage at his or her own expense, and will be provided with detailed notice of the right to continue coverage. 2) Employees who are reinstated after completing active duty or active or inactive duty training will be eligible for immediate coverage under any applicable medical insurance plans existing at the time without a waiting period. iv. Retirement Plans Employees who are participants in any Town-sponsored retirement plan will continue to accrue service credits during military leave, and such leave will not constitute a break in service, so long as the employee complies with requirements for reinstatement after completing active duty or active or inactive duty training. v. Life and Disability Insurance After the first 30 continuous calendar days of unpaid leave for active military service, coverage under the life and disability insurance plans sponsored by the Town will terminate. These plans may contain limitations on coverage for death and disabilities which occur during a declared or undeclared war. For more information about the policy provisions of these plans, contact Human Resources for a copy of the summary plan descriptions or policies. Page 35 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 11 of 16 vi. Reinstatement When all of the following conditions for reinstatement are met, an employee will be reinstated to the same position they had at the time the military leave commenced, or to a position of like status and pay, provided that: 1) The cumulative period of military service was no longer than five years, unless a longer period is required by federal or state law. 2) The individual employee must return to work, or apply in writing, for reinstatement in a timely manner as defined by federal and state law. While these laws contain exceptions, which could extend the time an employee has to return to work, they generally define timely manner as follows: a. Military service time of less than 31 days: reporting for work the next regularly scheduled work day following safe travel time plus eight (8) hours. b. Military service time of more than 30 days but less than 181 days: submitting an application for reinstatement within 14 days after release from military service. c. Military service time of more than 180 days: submitting an application or reinstatement within 90 days after release from military service. 3) The employee must provide documentation from the National Guard or United States Armed Forces that he or she honorably completed military service or active or inactive duty training, such as discharge papers. 4) An employee has the same right to reinstatement as if he or she had been continuously employed during the leave period. For example, the employee is not eligible for reinstatement if the job for which he or she was hired was for a specific time period which expired, or for a project which was completed during the absence, or if the position has been eliminated. 5) The employee is qualified to perform the duties of the pre-service position. If the employee is no longer qualified to perform the job with reasonable accommodations, he or she will be re-employed in another existing job that he or she is capable of performing. j. Administrative Leave i. Imposition of Administrative Leave 1) All Town employees, regardless of employment category, may be placed on administrative leave at any time, with or without cause or notice, at the sole discretion of the Town Administrator. Placement on administrative leave is not disciplinary in nature. Circumstances under which such a leave may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: a. To make inquiries into or investigate a work-related matter; Page 36 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 12 of 16 b. To remove the employee from the workplace pending a determination of job action; c.To protect the employee; d. To protect the public; e. To protect other employees or property in the workplace; or f. To further any other work-related or business-related purpose. 2) Unless it would harm an administrative or criminal investigation, and after consultation with Human Resources, the supervisor or manager shall place an employee on administrative leave as soon reasonably practical upon determination that such leave is appropriate under Section 306.j.ii of this policy. ii. Paid and Unpaid Administrative Leave 1) Administrative leave shall be with pay except under that following circumstances, in which case administrative leave may be without pay: a. The employee has been formally charged or indicted for a felony or misdemeanor and: i. The employee occupies a position of public trust and public visibility; or ii. The felony or misdemeanor relates to the performance of the employee’s official duties b. The employee has been formally charged or indicted for a crime of theft, a sex offense, or an offense that involves minors. 2) Before an employee is placed on unpaid administrative leave, the employee must be provided with a pre-determination hearing pursuant to Policy 308 for the purpose of providing the employee with the opportunity to be heard and present information concerning whether or not there are reasonable grounds to support the placement on unpaid administrative leave. 3) During paid administrative leave, an employee will continue to receive their regular, straight-time wages and benefits based on their position’s designated FTE. An employee eligible for holiday time and on paid administrative leave during a designated holiday will receive holiday pay for that day in lieu of pay for administrative leave. Page 37 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 13 of 16 iii. Employee Required to Remain Available An employee on paid or unpaid administrative leave must remain available during their regular working hours, and be available to return to work within one (1) day if requested to do so. This means that an employee on administrative leave may not consider the leave time as vacation or personal time. The employee must provide his or her supervisor with telephone numbers where he or she can be reached during regular working hours and must promptly return calls from the supervisor or Human Resources. In addition, the employee must obtain the prior permission of the supervisor and use accrued vacation time, compensatory time, or other leave time in order to be out of contact with his or her supervisor for longer than a single workday. iv. Employee Restrictions during Administrative Leave During administrative leave, an employee may not contact other employees or be at the work site unless directed to do so by their supervisor. k. Bereavement Leave i. Eligibility In the event of a death in an employee’s immediate family (defined in Section iii below), the Department Director may authorize paid leave of up to 40 hours for full-time employees to manage family affairs and attend the funeral. Part-time employees may be authorized paid leave at a prorated rate of 20 hours for an employee working on average 20 – 29 hours and 30 hours for an employee working on average 30 – 39 hours by their Department Director. ii. Requesting Bereavement Leave In order to request bereavement leave, an employee shall submit a written request to his or her Department Director, who shall approve, deny, or reduce of leave requested by the employee. In authorizing any requests for bereavement leave, consideration shall be given to the distance to be travelled and personal demands placed on the employee. iii. Immediate Family For the purposes of bereavement leave, the Town defines “Immediate Family” to include a spouse, a child, a parent, a parent in-law, a sibling, a brother or sister in- law, a grandparent, a grandchild, a stepparent, a stepchild, a stepbrother, a stepsister, a legal guardian, or a person with whom the employee shares a household with in a personal relationship. l. Domestic Violence Leave The Town complies with C.R.S. 24-34-402.7 as it relates to leave for victims of domestic violence. An employee eligible for leave under C.R.S. 24-34-402.7 will receive up to three (3) working days of unpaid leave from work in any twelve-month period. Page 38 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 14 of 16 m. Emergency Volunteer Service Leave The Town complies with C.R.S. 24-33.5-801 through C.R.S. 24-33.5-828 as it pertains to emergency volunteer service leave for employees. n.Volunteer Firefighter Leave The Town complies with C.R.S. 31-30-1131 as it pertains to the employment of volunteer firefighters. o. Volunteer Leave The purpose is to create community engagement opportunities for Town staff that support the Estes Valley. In addition, the Town recognizes that participating in volunteer projects and encouraging philanthropy will also enrich and inspire the lives of our employees and build strong work teams. Activities performed in the use of Volunteer Leave are considered personal in nature and not representative of the Town. i. Eligibility: Eight hours is granted to all full-time and part-time employees annually. Volunteer leave is pro-rated for part-time employees (50% for 20 - 29- hour part-time employees, 75% for 30 - 39-hour part-time employees). ii. Ineligibility: 1) Employees are ineligible if their employment terminates for any reason. 2) If the Volunteer leave program is discontinued for any reason, all leave previously granted and unused will become null and void. 3) The Town reserves the right to modify, amend, suspend or discontinue the program at any time without prior notice. 4) The Town reserves the right to revoke previous approval if it is determined the employee is misusing the program. iii. Leave Authorization: 1) Volunteer leave shall be requested in advance and is granted at the discretion of each employee’s supervisor. 2)Employees must receive the approval of their supervisor for the use of volunteer leave. It is the responsibility of the supervisor to ensure the leave approved is in compliance with the requirements of this policy. 2) Work demands shall take priority over the volunteer leave request. 3)Volunteer leave may be used individually or with other employees as a team volunteer activity. 4) Volunteer leave shall not be used in the computation of overtime and compensatory time. iv. Use of Volunteer Leave: 1) Volunteer leave must be used during the year accrued or it will be forfeited on December 31st. 2) Employees will be paid at their regular wage for volunteer leave hours. 3) Following the use of volunteer leave, the employee must enter the time into Paylocity using the Volunteer Leave code and insert a note regarding the project. 4) Examples of appropriate volunteer leave include but are not limited to: a. Working with an organization to clean up a road or trail. Page 39 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 15 of 16 b. Performing restoration work in a natural area. c.Volunteering at a food bank. d. Participating in childhood mentoring or educational programs. 5) Examples of inappropriate volunteer leave include but are not limited to: a. Taking a ski vacation and charitably giving ski lessons. b. Attending your child’s PTA conference. c. Canvassing for a political campaign. d. Religious, professional, or political activities. e. Town events associated with an employee’s normal job duties per the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 6) Volunteer Leave may be used in one day or spread over the calendar year in one (1) hour increments, depending on the work needs of the employee’s department and supervisor approval. 7) Volunteer Leave shall be used for nonprofits and taxing districts within the Park R-3 School District boundary. The organization must serve the Estes Valley. 8) Situations not addressed in this policy would require the approval of the Town Administrator. p. Education Leave Eligible employees, when necessary, and upon approval of the Department Director, may be granted a maximum of four hours per week of paid educational leave to attend classes (see Policy 305.f for more information). For the purposes of this policy, Town- sponsored and/or mandatory training is not considered education leave. q. Leave without Pay i. Eligibility Any full-time, part-time employee and contract employee in good standing is eligible for leave without pay. ii. Benefit When in the best interests of the Town and the employee, the Town Administrator may grant a leave without pay to any eligible employee for a period of up to three (3) months. Such leave shall not constitute a break in employment, and the employee shall return to his or her position at the expiration of the leave period. Temporary help may be obtained during the employee’s absence. iii. Interaction with other Benefits Annual and sick leave shall not accrue while the employee is on leave without pay. Failure to return to work at the expiration of a leave of absence shall be considered a resignation. If applicable, leave without pay may run concurrently with FMLA leave subject to required medical certification. The employee will be responsible for all insurance premiums, and must pay these in advance of leave. Page 40 Document Title Policy 306 - Leave 8/5/207/30/20 Revisions: 23 Town of Estes Park, Human Resources Page 16 of 16 iv. Requesting Leave without Pay In order to request a leave without pay, an employee shall submit a written request to his or her Department Director. Requests for leave without pay will be considered in the following manner: 1) If the request is for two (2) days or less, and will not exceed the two (2) days per month limitation, the Department Director may approve, deny, or change the requested leave. 2) If the request is for three (3) or more days, or if the two (2) days per month limitation is to be exceeded, the Department Director shall forward this request to Human Resources and the Town Administrator along with a recommendation to approve, deny, or change the requested amount of leave. In this case, the Town Administrator makes the final determination on whether to approve, deny, or change the requested amount of leave without pay. Approved: _____________________________ Wendy Koenig, Mayor _____________ Date Page 41 Page 42 1 PROCEDURE FOR LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Applicable items include: Annexation, Amended Plats, Boundary Line Adjustments, Development Plans, Rezoning, Special Review, Subdivision 1.MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on PLANNING ACTION ITEM 1, RESOLUTION 53-20 ELKHORN LODGE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT, 600 WEST ELKHORN AVENUE, ZAHOUREK CONSERVANCY, LLC, OWNER, EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A TEXAS LLC, C/O JUSTIN MABEY, APPLICANT. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the information presented during the public hearing, from the Town staff, from the Applicant, public comment, and written comments received on the application. Has any Trustee had any ex-parte communications concerning this application(s) which are not part of the Board packet. Any member of the Board may ask questions at any stage of the public hearing which may be responded to at that time. Mayor declares the Public Hearing open. 2.STAFF REPORT. Review the staff report. Review any conditions for approval not in the staff report. 3.APPLICANT. The applicant makes their presentation. 4. PUBLIC COMMENT. Any person will be given an opportunity to address the Board concerning the application. All individuals must state their name and address for the record. Comments from the public are requested to be limited to three minutes per person. 5. REBUTTAL. Page 43 2 The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal that is limited to or in response to statements or questions made after their presentation. No new matters may be submitted. 6. MAYOR. Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application which are not in the Board packet. Ask the Board of Trustees if there are any further questions concerning the application. Indicate that all reports, statements, exhibits, and written communications presented will be accepted as part of the record. Declare the public hearing closed. Request Board consider a motion. 7. SUGGESTED MOTION. Suggested motion(s) are set forth in the staff report. 8. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. Discussion by the Board on the motion. 9. VOTE ON THE MOTION. Vote on the motion or consideration of another action. Page 44 Community Development Memo To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date: August 11, 2020 RE: Resolution 53-20, Elkhorn Lodge Final Subdivision Plat, 600 West Elkhorn Avenue, Zahourek Conservancy, LLC, Owner, East Avenue Development, LLC, A Texas LLC, c/o Justin Mabey, Applicant (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Conduct a public hearing to consider and make a decision on the Elkhorn Lodge Final Subdivision Plat. NOTE: Please refer to staff report memo for the Elkhorn Lodge Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), which contains relevant information for this Final Plat application. The PUD will be on the Town Board agenda immediately prior to this Final Plat. Action Recommended: Staff recommends approval of the Elkhorn Lodge Final Subdivision Plat, with the following findings and conditions of approval: Findings 1. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Park Downtown Plan. 3. The Final PUD and Final Plat comply with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. 4. Adequate public facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. Page 45 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were raised by any review agency. Conditions of Approval 1. The Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat approval are subject to the conditions and stipulations as recommended by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Development Review, dated July 21, 2020 and attached to the Estes Park Department of Community Development staff report for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Subdivision Plat, dated August 11, 2020. 2. Within sixty (60) days of the Board’s approval of the Final PUD and Final Plat, the developer shall submit the Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat for recording. If the plat and plan are not both submitted for recording within this sixty-day time period, both approvals shall automatically lapse and be null and void. Sample Motions: 1. I move to approve Resolution 53-20 for the Elkhorn Lodge Final Plat according to findings of fact with findings as recommended by staff. 2. I move to deny Resolution 53-20 for the Elkhorn Lodge Final Plat finding that … [state findings for denial]. 3. I move to continue Resolution 53-20, for the Elkhorn Lodge Final Plat to the next regularly scheduled meeting. (State reasons for continuance.) Attachment: 1. Resolution 53-20 Page 46 RESOLUTION 53-20 APPROVING ELKHORN LODGE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT WHEREAS, an application for the Elkhorn Lodge Final Subdivision Plat was filed by East Avenue Development, LLC, a Texas LLC (applicant); and WHEREAS, the Elkhorn Lodge Final Subdivision Plat proposes thirteen (13) lots on a parcel approximately 18.58 acres in size, located within a CO (Outlying Commercial) Zoning District, with a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development overlay (Elkhorn Lodge PUD) also proposed for the subject property; and WHEREAS, the lots created by Elkhorn Lodge Subdivision Final Plat are proposed to range from 0.276 to 3.291 acres in size; and WHEREAS, a public hearing, preceded by proper public notice, was held by the Board of Trustees on August 11, 2020 and at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed and taken administrative notice of the testimony, application, evidence, documents submitted at the hearing, and the contents of the Community Development Director’s file; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees finds the applicants have complied with the applicable requirements of the Estes Park Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Elkhorn Lodge Final Subdivision Plat is hereby approved, with the following findings and conditions of approval: Findings 1. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Park Downtown Plan. 3. The Final PUD and Final Plat comply with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. 4. Adequate public facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were raised by any review agency. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 47 Conditions of Approval 1. The Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat approval are subject to the conditions and stipulations as recommended by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Development Review, dated July 21, 2020 and attached to the Estes Park Department of Community Development staff report for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Subdivision Plat, dated August 11, 2020. 2. Within sixty (60) days of the Board’s approval of the Final PUD and Final Plat, the developer shall submit the Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat for recording. If the plat and plan are not both submitted for recording within this sixty-day time period, both approvals shall automatically lapse and be null and void. DATED this day of , 2020. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney Page 48 1 PROCEDURE FOR LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING Applicable items include: Annexation, Amended Plats, Boundary Line Adjustments, Development Plans, Rezoning, Special Review, Subdivision 1.MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on PLANNING ACTION ITEM 2, RESOLUTION 54-20 ELKHORN LODGE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), 600 WEST ELKHORN AVENUE, ZAHOUREK CONSERVANCY, LLC, OWNER, EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A TEXAS LLC, C/O JUSTIN MABEY, APPLICANT. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the information presented during the public hearing, from the Town staff, from the Applicant, public comment, and written comments received on the application. Has any Trustee had any ex-parte communications concerning this application(s) which are not part of the Board packet. Any member of the Board may ask questions at any stage of the public hearing which may be responded to at that time. Mayor declares the Public Hearing open. 2.STAFF REPORT. Review the staff report. Review any conditions for approval not in the staff report. 3.APPLICANT. The applicant makes their presentation. 4. PUBLIC COMMENT. Any person will be given an opportunity to address the Board concerning the application. All individuals must state their name and address for the record. Comments from the public are requested to be limited to three minutes per person. 5. REBUTTAL. Page 49 2 The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal that is limited to or in response to statements or questions made after their presentation. No new matters may be submitted. 6. MAYOR. Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application which are not in the Board packet. Ask the Board of Trustees if there are any further questions concerning the application. Indicate that all reports, statements, exhibits, and written communications presented will be accepted as part of the record. Declare the public hearing closed. Request Board consider a motion. 7. SUGGESTED MOTION. Suggested motion(s) are set forth in the staff report. 8. DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. Discussion by the Board on the motion. 9. VOTE ON THE MOTION. Vote on the motion or consideration of another action. Page 50 To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Jeffrey Woeber, AICP, Senior Planner Date: August 11, 2020 RE: Resolution 54-20, Elkhorn Lodge Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), 600 West Elkhorn Avenue, Zahourek Conservancy, LLC, Owner, East Avenue Development, LLC, A Texas LLC, c/o Justin Mabey, Applicant (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Conduct a public hearing to consider and make a decision on the Elkhorn Lodge Final Planned Unit Development (PUD). Note: The public hearing may be conducted electronically. Advance registration for testifying at the public hearing is preferred to ensure an orderly hearing. Information for participation in the public hearing will be provided in the published agenda, which will be available at https://estespark.colorado.gov/boardsandmeetings. Present Situation: The property contains 18.58± acres, and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Elkhorn Avenue and Old Ranger Drive. The property is addressed as 600 West Elkhorn Avenue. It is within portions of Sections 25 and 26, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., Town of Estes Park. See attached vicinity map. The property is the longtime location of the historic Elkhorn Lodge, also the recent past location of the “Lazy B” entertainment venue. Other existing uses on the property include rental cabins and the Elkhorn Stables commercial horseback riding facility. Proposal: Background Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Page 51 The proposal involves a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a subdivision. A Preliminary PUD and Preliminary Subdivision Plat were reviewed, and recommended for approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission on February 25, 2020. The Town Board approved the Preliminary PUD and Preliminary Subdivision Plat on June 23, 2020. The second part of the approval process is this Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat. The Final PUD and Plat go only to the Town Board, and are not reviewed by the Estes Park Planning Commission. This PUD and subdivision application has been ongoing since early 2020, with it being originally scheduled for the March Town Board Hearing and delayed by the COVID emergency. Preliminary and Final PUDs and subdivisions are often processed and presented concurrently to the Town Board. With a fairly lengthy and in-depth review of the flood plain being required, it was decided to process the Preliminary and Final separately. With that being the case, much of the material and information in this Final PUD review is very similar to the Preliminary review that was presented to the Town Board in June. Thirteen (13) lots are proposed. The applicant’s submittal provides a fairly in-depth description of the project, and the proposed uses on each lot. Below is a basic overview of what is proposed on each of the 13 lots: Lot 1 – 3.291 acres. Location of an Event Center Barn. Lot 2 – 4.534 acres. Location of the Elkhorn Lodge and expansion, with cabins, a relocated historic schoolhouse, and pool. Lot 3 – 1.026 acres. Location of the new Riverside Restaurant. Lot 4 – 2.005 acres. To contain equestrian, horseback riding facilities with a new horse barn and corral. Lot 5 – 4.674 acres. Location of the new Elkhorn Suites 132 room hotel Lot 6 – 0.254 acre. Location of the new Hillside restaurant and retail building. Lot 7 – 0.413 acre. Location of the Coach House to be renovated into a restaurant and distillery. Lot 8 – 0.472 acre. Location of existing church, to be renovated and used as wedding facility. Lot 9 – 0.379 acre. Location of existing rental cabin, to remain. Lot 10 – 0.276 acre. Location of existing rental cabin, to remain. Lot 11 – 0.583 acre. Location of existing rental cabin, to remain. Lot 12 – 0.351 acre. Location of existing rental cabin, to remain. Lot 13 – 0.348 acre. Location of existing rental cabin, to remain. PUD Review, EPDC Chapter 9 PUDs Since adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC, now called Estes Park Development Code) in 2000, there have been very few PUDs proposed or approved in the Estes Valley. Staff is aware of only two or three having been processed in the last 20+ years. Page 52 Below is a general overview of the PUD Chapter of the EPDC (Chapter 9): PUDs are encouraged in the Estes Valley to provide for innovations in commercial and residential development, to provide a variety in type, design, and layout of buildings, and provide a process that can relate type, design and layout of development to a particular site. PUDs are allowed only in the CO (Outlying Commercial) Zone District, as a Mixed-Use PUD overlay. The uses allowed, other than the CO uses, are limited to residential uses and accommodation uses. The PUD Chapter’s Section 9.3.D. Applicable Development Standards, 1. states, “Yard, bulk and dimensional requirement set forth in Chapter 4, including but not limited to minimum lot area, shall not apply to interior lots or building sites within a PUD that do not abut land uses located outside the PUD development parcel.” Yard pertains to area between property lines and buildings, specifying minimum setbacks to property lines. Bulk generally relates to sizing, volume, area, and height of structures on a given parcel. In general terms, the purpose of a PUD is for flexibility in proposed uses and in zoning standards such as setbacks, height, lot area, etc. These often can differ in different areas within a given PUD. The PUD Chapter’s Section 9.3.D.2., All Other Zoning Requirements, also provides flexibility. Under that Section, “all other zoning development and design standards” (other than the Yard, Bulk and Dimensional Requirements), shall apply to PUDs “…unless otherwise specifically exempted, modified or varied pursuant to this Chapter (Chapter 9) or to Section 3.6, “Variances.” Although it is quite open-ended to require applying “all other zoning development and design standards” to a PUD project, this Section apparently refers to the applicable General Development Standards under Chapter 7 of the EPDC. Section 9.1, Purposes, under 9.1.C., states PUDs are encouraged in the Estes Valley “To provide a process that can relate the type, design and layout of residential and commercial development to a particular site, thereby encouraging the preservation of the site’s natural characteristics, and to encourage integrated planning in order to achieve the purposes of this Chapter.” The EPDC also provides for flexibility in a PUD under Chapter 3. Review Procedures and Standards, Section 3.4.D.1.e., Planned Unit Developments, Standards for Review. That Section states, “…certain standards may be modified or varied upon a finding that the proposed PUD incorporates creative site design such that it represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards…” EPDC Section 3.4 Planned Unit Developments Page 53 D. Standards for Review All applications for Planned Unit Developments shall demonstrate compliance with the requirements and review standards set forth below and in Chapter 9, “Planned Unit Developments,” and with all other application provisions of this Code. Subdivision Review, EPDC Section 3.9 Subdivisions E.Standards for Review. All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, "Subdivision Standards," and all other applicable provisions of this Code. For minor subdivisions, the EPPC shall also find that approval will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this Code. Review Criteria Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1.Landscaping. The site includes numerous existing, mature trees and shrubs. The applicant has proposed providing 68 additional trees and 163 additional shrubs. There are existing natural buffers (mature trees, topography, river and floodplain area), some of which are being enhanced with new landscaping. Other areas of the site do not allow for additional landscaping. Staff has reviewed the proposed landscaping plan and approves the alternative proposal for locational requirements. 2.Public Trails/Sidewalks. A 10-foot wide, multi-modal path is proposed on the south side of Elkhorn Avenue to a new Spruce Street pedestrian crossing. A new pedestrian crossing is proposed for the new entrance at Elkhorn Avenue. 3.Utilities. The property is currently served by all utilities. Estes Park Sanitation District has provided comments, with numerous requirements for extension and upgrade of wastewater infrastructure for the proposed uses, as well as relocation of a line that is currently under an existing structure. Town of Estes Park Utilities (water, electric, broadband) has “no objection” to the proposal, noting public utilities are required to be in approved easements. 4.Fire Protection. The Estes Valley Fire Protection District has reviewed this proposal and has provided comments, noting District requirements for sprinklers and alarms within some structures, access road requirements, and restaurant hood and extinguishing systems. Page 54 5.Open Space. The EPDC’s PUD regulations require 30% of the gross area to be set aside as open space (open areas). This project proposes 41.1%, which well exceeds the standard. 6.Stormwater, Floodplain. A Preliminary Drainage Report has been submitted and has been reviewed by Town Public Works/Engineering, who requires “Adequate drainage facilities and services to support the proposed development shall be available concurrently with the impacts of such development.” The site includes significant flood plain, with Fall River located adjacent to the property, generally to the north. A floodwall is proposed. A Preliminary Floodplain Report was submitted. The Town Public Works Department had a hydraulic engineering consultant review the applicant’s report, and the consultant then wrote a memo with comments and recommendations. Public Works has incorporated these comments and recommendations in their comments for the PUD and subdivision project (see attached). 7.Parking. The project includes the appropriate amounts of required off-street parking for the proposed uses A total of 335 parking spaces are required for the uses within the project. The applicant proposes 360 parking spaces. With various uses being in close proximity to others, and the fact there are numerous individual lots, the applicant, in the Statement of Intent, states there will be shared parking and access, which will be noted on the final subdivision plat, which ultimately gets recorded. 8.Access. The site’s primary access is from Elkhorn Avenue. This access is to be reconstructed, and aligned to be perpendicular to Filbey Court, which is located to the north. An existing secondary, emergency access is located to the northwest. 9.Event Facility. An “Event Center” is proposed on Lot 1, described as an “Event Center Barn.” The use is allowable as both a CO (Commercial Outlying) and as an A (Accommodations) use. The definition of an Event Facility, from the EPDC Chapter 13, Definitions, is as follows: Event Facility. A building or portion of a building, outdoor area(s), and related parking which is rented, leased, or otherwise made available for individuals or groups to accommodate episodic or discrete functions involving participation by multiple individuals, including but not limited to weddings, banquets, anniversaries and other similar events. Such use may include kitchen facilities for the preparation or catering of food, or the sale and/or serving of appropriately permitted alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption. Food service shall occur only during scheduled events and shall not be open to the general public. An event Page 55 facility may be operated in conjunction with other uses, subject to all applicable provisions of the EPDC. 10. Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use Guidelines for the Downtown Planning Sub-Area specifically identifies and categorizes the Elkhorn Lodge site as “Commercial Downtown.” The Elkhorn Lodge property has long been considered part of Downtown Estes Park, per the Comprehensive Plan, which originally included all properties within the now defunct Urban Renewal District. 11. The site is included in the Estes Park Downtown Plan (January 2018), which identify it as a Character Area landmark and a Community Focal Point, described as a node of activity that contributes to the physical identity of a Character Area. This proposed PUD project is consistent with a Key Objective in the Downtown Plan, which is to “Preserve and enhance the Elkhorn Lodge with new uses and activities.” Recommendations for the Elkhorn Lodge Character Area in the Downtown Plan are as follows: The Elkhorn Lodge site (s1) should be redeveloped in a manner that celebrates its historic significance and creates a major activity center and destination for Character Area 1 and the Town. Housing, lodging, entertainment, retail and other activities should be combined in a landmark project that engages the Fall River. Access to Elkhorn Lodge should be realigned to create a perpendicular entry across from Filbey Court. A formal intersection will create a safer environment for vehicles and pedestrians, while also enhancing awareness and visibility of the Lodge. The project as proposed is consistent with these Character Area recommendations. 12. PUD Waivers and Modifications. Through the EPDC’s PUD process, “…certain standards may be modified or varied…” The requested waivers are outlined beginning on page 8 of the applicant’s Statement of Intent (attached, revised July 6, 2020), with a detailed description and rationale for each. Staff notes these waivers were included in the Preliminary PUD application, which was reviewed and approved by the Town Board in June. They are included in this final review for informational purposes. The requests are summarized as follows: 1. Appendix D, highway frontage sidewalk 2. Section 4.4D.2 Main entrance of structure to face front lot line Page 56 3. Table 4.7 loading space required 4. Table 4.5 maximum building height 5. Appendix D, internal access road to be up to “street standards” 6. Appendix D, internal access road to meet slope/grade standards 7. Section 7.6.D.2., wetland disturbance, wetland area 0.06 acre in size 8. Appendix B, architectural elevations for all structures Application Submittal Revisions, Floodplain Analysis The Final PUD and Subdivision Plat were submitted for review and comment. Per the comments received, the plan set and plat has been revised, along with the applicant’s Statement of Intent. The attachments (see below) include these revised documents. Staff has also attached a letter from the applicant’s engineering/surveying consultant, which provides a detailed overview of the changes. The Elkhorn site is adjacent to Fall River, and has experienced significant flood-related issues in the past. In order to meet Town Floodplain Administration requirements and standards, which are tied to some recently implemented, highly technical requirements by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), a Flood Model Report was prepared by the applicant’s engineer. This modeled the efficacy of the proposed flood wall and impact of other proposed structural and drainage improvements associated with the project. This was a time and labor intensive review, and the primary reason this Final PUD and Final Plat review was extended to August 11. Advantages: The proposed project, as a whole, upgrades and improves a visible and vital entry to the downtown area, while meeting many of the specific recommendations of the Estes Park Downtown Plan. The proposed project retains some of the longtime uses and structures that have been established on the historic property, while also improving the safety and aesthetics of the site. Disadvantage: Increases traffic in this area of Town. Action Recommended: Staff recommends the Town Board of Trustees approve the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat (the Final Subdivision Plat is a separate agenda item, requiring a separate action by the Town Board). Staff recommends the following findings, which are consistent with the findings made for the Preliminary PUD and Preliminary Subdivision Plat, and also the following conditions of approval: Findings 1. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. Page 57 2. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Park Downtown Plan. 3. The Final PUD and Final Plat comply with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. 4. Adequate public facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were raised by any review agency. Conditions of Approval 1. The Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat approval are subject to the conditions and stipulations as recommended by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Development Review, dated July 21, 2020 and attached to the Estes Park Department of Community Development staff report for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Subdivision Plat, dated August 11, 2020. 2. Within sixty (60) days of the Board’s approval of the Final PUD and Final Plat, the developer shall submit the Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat for recording. If the plat and plan are not submitted for recording within this sixty- day time period, both approvals shall automatically lapse and be null and void. Finance/Resource Impact: None. Level of Public Interest Medium. Written comments have been received for these applications, primarily prior to the Preliminary PUD and Plat approval. At the June Town Board hearing for the Preliminary PUD, some questions and concerns were raised by area property owners primarily regarding ensuring whether the development and lodging facilities were to be higher end, rather than budget level facilities, as well as the proximity of a restaurant to the condominiums located to the east. See the revised Statement of Intent, as well as the applicant’s overview of changes, attached. Some questions and concerns regarding wildlife on the Elkhorn site were raised at the June hearing. A Wildlife Habitat Evaluation and Conservation Plan was prepared by a qualified professional. This Plan contains some recommended construction and post construction mitigation measures to minimize impacts, and concludes, “The proposed project will not adversely affect wildlife species that currently use the site or any rare plant populations or communities.” The Plan is available in the application submittal documents online: www.estes.org/currentapplications All written comments are posted to: www.estes.org/currentapplications Sample Motions Page 58 1. I move to approve Resolution 54-20 for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD according to findings of fact with findings and conditions of approval recommended by staff. 2. I move to deny Resolution 54-20 for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD finding that … [state findings for denial]. 3. I move to continue Resolution 54-20, for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD to the next regularly scheduled meeting. (State reasons for continuance.) Attachments: 1. Resolution 54-20 2. Vicinity Map 3. Statement of Intent d. 7/6/2020 4. Applicant’s Overview of Changes, d. 7/9/2020 5. Application 6. Public Works Comments d. 7/21/2020 7. Final PUD Plan Set 8. Final Subdivision Plat The full application, as well as submittal materials associated with the Preliminary PUD and plat, are available at this link: www.estes.org/currentapplications Page 59 RESOLUTION 54-20 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ELKHORN LODGE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), A MIXED USE PUD OVERLAY ON LAND ZONED CO (OUTLYING COMMERCIAL), LOCATED ON A PROPERTY ADDRESSED AS 600 WEST ELKHORN AVENUE, DESCRIBED AS BEING WITHIN PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 25 AND 26, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF ESTES PARK WHEREAS, an application for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD was filed by East Avenue Development, LLC, a Texas LLC (applicant); and WHEREAS, the subject property, 18.58± acres in size, is located in portions of Sections 25 and 26, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., Town of Estes Park, with the same property also proposed to be the Elkhorn Lodge Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Development Code, Chapter 9 Planned Unit Developments, allows a Mixed-Use PUD overlay on land located in CO (Outlying Commercial) Zoning Districts, with the uses permitted in the PUD being limited to those uses allowed in the underlying CO zoning, Residential uses, and/or Accommodations uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD is a Mixed-Use PUD overlay on land located in a CO (Outlying Commercial) Zoning District, with the uses proposed limited to those allowed in the underlying CO zoning, Residential uses, and Accommodations uses; and WHEREAS, the Estes Park Board of Trustees approved the Elkhorn Lodge Preliminary PUD on June 23, 2020 by Ordinance No. 05-20; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD complies with applicable standards set forth in the Estes Park Development Code. WHEREAS, a public hearing, preceded by proper public notice, was held by the Board of Trustees on August 11, 2020 and at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed and taken administrative notice of the testimony, application, evidence, documents submitted at the hearing, and the contents of the Community Development Director’s file; and ATTACHMENT 1 Page 60 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Elkhorn Lodge Final Planned Unit Development is hereby approved, with the following findings and conditions of approval: Findings 1. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Final PUD and Final Plat are generally consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the Estes Park Downtown Plan. 3. The Final PUD and Final Plat comply with applicable standards set forth in the EPDC. 4. Adequate public facilities are currently available to serve the proposed project. 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were raised by any review agency. Conditions of Approval 1. The Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat approval are subject to the conditions and stipulations as recommended by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Development Review, dated July 21, 2020 and attached to the Estes Park Department of Community Development staff report for the Elkhorn Lodge Final PUD and Subdivision Plat, dated August 11, 2020. 2. Within sixty (60) days of the Board’s approval of the Final PUD and Final Plat, the developer shall submit the Final PUD and Final Subdivision Plat for recording. If the plat and plan are not both submitted for recording within this sixty-day time period, both approvals shall automatically lapse and be null and void. DATED this day of , 2020. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Page 61 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney Page 62 Site Location Ê W E L K H O R N A V E W WO N D E R V I E W A V E ELM RDBI GHO R NDRMORAINE AVEMA C GR E GOR AVEFA L L R IV E R R D ROCKRIDGERDCHAPINLND A V IS ST O L D R AN G E R D R ERIVERSIDEDRFALLRIVERLN VALLEY R D RIVERSIDE DRCLEAVE ST F A R V IE W DR JU N IPERLNJAMESSTCOURTNEYLNMOONR ID GER DKENWOODLN LOTT STSPRUCED R E ELKHOR N A V E CRAGS DRVIRGINIA DR RANG E VIEW RD E V E R G R EENLN F AR VIEW LN WIEST D R PARKLNBOYD LN FILBEY CTMA RIGO L D L N MOCC A SIN STSTEAMER CTOLYMPUSRD VIRGINIAD R 0 250 500 Feet -Town of Estes ParkCommunity Development Printed: 2/11/2020 Created By: jeff woeber Project Name: Project Description: Elkhorn Lodge Preliminary PUD/PlatFor Illustrative Purposes Only ATTACHMENT 2 Page 63 Page 1 of 9 STATEMENT OF INTENT FINAL ELKHORN LODGE P.U.D. AND SUBDIVISION Being a portion of Elkhorn Addition and a portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, and the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Revised July 6th, 2020 Added Public Works Approvals to Waiver Requests, updated the National Register of Historical Places information, showed the stairs coming off the Riverside Restaurant, added two trash bins to the site plan. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed development is a major portion of the 1958 Elkhorn Addition to the Town of Estes Park. The subject property is located south of Elkhorn Avenue at the west end of the Downtown area of Estes Park. The property address for the existing developed parcel is 600 West Elkhorn Avenue, Estes Park, CO This project is located within the limits of the Town of Estes Park. OWNER: The current owner (County records) is Zahourek Conservatory LLC. The entity under agreement to purchase and develop this project is East Avenue Development, LLC, C/O Justin Mabey. PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR THE ELKHORN LODGE P.U.D.: This proposed project is presented as a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) that is only allowed by The Estes Valley Development Code (Code or EVDC) in the current Commercial Outlying (CO) zoning district, for which this development is included. Accommodations uses and residential uses are permitted uses in a Mixed Use PUD Proposal in the CO Zoning District. One hundred and ninety seven (197) hotel units are proposed in two main buildings on site. One is a new 132 Unit stand-alone hotel building and the other is an addition (36 hotel rooms) annexed to the existing Elkhorn Lodge Building which has 29 existing hotel rooms within. The old Elkhorn Lodge is on The National Register of Historic Places, along with five other buildings on the property. Although they are not protected, three of them will remain, and include a major remodeling project with the purpose/intent of keeping that landmark present in the Estes Valley. Several other buildings that are not on the Register will be saved and remodeled including the old school house. The Developer plans to go to great extent for this historic feature to remain, and has intentionally had the new hotel building designed to be architecturally compatible to the old Lodge Building. In addition to these hotel uses, there are 2 new restaurant pads being developed and one renovation of the Coach House for restaurant use. These restaurant sites will be offered for rent or sale to regional or local restaurant venders. Below one of the restaurants (Hillside), there is a small retail use proposed (2,880 s.f.). The one remaining large existing historic barn on site (which is slated for relocation-new construction with the intent for the “skin” wood being repurposed on the new structure) will meet Building Code and the EVDC for commercial uses including an Event Facility. An additional (new) barn building for the continuing long standing horse operation on site is ATTACHMENT 3 Page 64 Page 2 of 9 proposed far south of the old barn site. Lastly, there is a subdivision of the property proposed to create 13 separate lots. Lot 1: This lot will contain a new 8,100sf Event Center Barn to replace the old barn that is being removed from the floodplain. It is similar in size and will be used for events such as weddings, corporate outings, Lazy-B sing-a-longs and other similar events. The old barn will be raised and salvaged for as much material as possible to re-side the new barn and add old-time stable character to the building. The new building is intended to look like the existing barn on the exterior. The floorspace will be significantly different since it will be an event center now instead of a horse stable. This use is permitted in the CO zone and will be consistent with the new Event Center code language. Lot 2: This lot contains the existing Elkhorn Lodge and several outbuildings, mostly used for wrangler housing and offices. The Lodge will be kept and an addition will be placed on the west side. The other outbuildings will be removed. The addition is intended to blend with the old lodge as much as possible. The original 29 units, ballroom, lobby, dining room and kitchen in the Lodge will be remodeled and the addition will contain 36 new units. Three on-site cabins will be relocated to the west of the old Lodge and remodeled for guest stay. The original Schoolhouse will be relocated as well and will be used as a small event facility and historic tours. An outdoor pool will be located at the center of all the structures. Lot 3: This lot contains the original residence for the property prior to the Elkhorn Lodge being constructed. It will be raised and a new Riverside Restaurant will be constructed in its place. The restaurant will be approximately 6,040sf in a two story structure. Lot 4: A new 1,800sf Horse Barn will be constructed to continue the livery stables on the property. It will be constructed on the southwest portion of the lot with the north portion to be mostly a corral for the horses. The building will have the same character and colors of the old barn and the new event center, however it will be have stables and a small office and bathroom for the livery’s business operations. It will be open to the public with parking provided, however, it is anticipated that a majority of the customers will come from this property, likely walking to the livery. This is a use permitted by S2 in the CO zone, however since it is an existing historical use, an S2 should not required. The PUD has a similar review process to an S2, so it is being seen and reviewed by the same authorities as would an S2. Lot 5: This will be the flagship lot that will contain the new 132 unit Elkhorn Suites. There are numerous cabins in the area, most of which will be demolished. Three of the “better” cabins will be relocated and remodeled, as well as the Schoolhouse, on Lot 2. The suites will be a three story building, in three sections. Each section will rise one story as the building progresses westerly to fit the contours of the lot. A height waiver request through the PUD process is requested with this submittal as outlined later in the requested waivers. Lot 6: This lot will have a new building that will contain some retail space below and a new restaurant, the Hillside Restaurant, above. The building will be roughly 5,760sf total. Lot 7: The Coach House is the primary building on this lot and it will be remodeled in to a Restaurant. A small addition will be added on the south for additional kitchen and storage space. The basement is planned to be a distillery business. The building will be roughly 5,750sf total. Lot 8: This lot contains the Old Church. It is widely believed to be the first church in Estes Park and it will be remodeled and used for small events and weddings and historical tours, much like the Schoolhouse that is being relocated and remodeled on Lot 2. Lot 9-13: These lots will be for each of the existing “Alpine” cabins on the hill along the south side of the property. Each of the cabins will be remodeled into single family residential structures as they currently exist. They will primarily be rentals, or employee housing, through the lodge business, however, in the future, they may be sold and available for full time residential ownership. Page 65 Page 3 of 9 The parking for all the commercial lots (1-8) and uses will be shared by the individual lots. There is adequate parking distributed throughout the site on Lots 1-8 that can accommodate each of the uses in full operation. The residential lots (9-13) will have their own private parking dedicated to their individual lots. The shared parking along with access will be addressed with a note on the plat. Maintenance will be addressed through a Property Owners Association. See the attached Preliminary Elkhorn Lodge PUD Subdivision Plat for additional details. The PUD process in the Estes Valley has its own specific Code section (Chapter 9) and associated standards. The PUD process in the EVDC cites the following five (5) abbreviated purposes: •Encourage innovations in residential and commercial development and renewal…. •Encourage more efficient use of land and public services to reflect change in technology of land development…. •To provide a process (PUD) that can relate type, design and layout of residential and commercial development to the particular site, thereby encouraging the preservation of the sites natural characteristics and to encourage integrated planning… •To provide for well located, commercial sites and well-designed residential developments while minimizing impact on roads, streets and other transportation facilities…and, •To conserve the value of the land. As can be ascertained by reviewing this proposal, all five PUD, “purposes” have been adhered to, addressed and used as guides for this design and the planned development of this site. SITE DENSITY AND IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: EVDC PUD Regulation 9.3.C.3 (last sentence) states: Each independently calculated land area shall be deducted from the total land area available for development to determine the permitted density on a site. This provision allows Lot 5, proposed at 4.674 Acres (calculated to a max of 113 units with the 1,800 s.f./unit factor) to propose 132 units. In the same light, Lot 2 is proposed at only 65 units, but is allowed 113 Accommodations units. What this allows overall to this site, is mixed use density with numerical accountability represented by the flexibility of a PUD with clustered density. This design allowance and concept leaves more open area around the project’s perimeter and softened transition into the neighborhood (for example the very low density along the north, south and west sides of this development). See Density Table on Sheet 1 of 10 for more information/quantification. Please note that a large number of Units (nearly 29 Residential Units or 146 Accommodation Units) are, “left on the table” and not requested with this proposal. The impervious coverage limitation (65% max.) is easily met on this development as a whole with only 36.1% proposed to be hard covered. See Statistical Information Breakdown on Sheet 1 of 10. Additionally, the open space provided by this development is 41.1%, 30% required by a PUD. ADDITIONAL PROPOSED SITE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS TO NOTE: 1. A retaining wall is proposed to provide ample room for the dynamic river, yet define the floodplain on the property and to provide a hard feature limitation for flooding to protect the buildings. The 100 year regulatory floodplain (using best available data) will be contained on the riverside of the wall with free board. 2. The recent reconstruction of the river by the Estes Valley Watershed Coalition will remain intact (even though the physical location of the river was constructed outside of the previously modeled CHAMP floodplain). 3. Relatively minor excavation and revegetation on the south side of the river (outside the existing actual river) is proposed to provide a “no-rise” result. Page 66 Page 4 of 9 4. Given the proximity of this site and the river, no new storm water detention is proposed. Water quality is addressed as part of the Drainage Plan and Report (attached). 5. The Barn will be relocated out of the floodplain and used as an Event Center Barn. This will provide the river more capacity (the barn was included in the CHAMP river model as an obstruction). 6. The new smaller Barn (1,800 s.f.) for the continued horse riding will be located well out of the floodplain which will improve the water quality in the river just upstream of Town. 7. The original and existing Lodge Building east of the Elkhorn Lodge will be removed and that area will house the proposed Riverside Restaurant site. 8. The historic School House and some of the existing historic cabins will be relocated /saved. 9. The Alpine Buildings on the hill will be remodeled and saved. 10. The Coach House will remain and be converted into a restaurant. 11. Main trunk utilities will be maintained and or upgraded, including a new river crossing for sanitary sewer and appropriate easements dedicated. See below for additional detail on separately listed utilities. 12. The backdrop of thick trees on the hill south of the new hotel and existing Lodge will basically remain untouched. This will protect the roof of the new hotel from extending above the skyline or horizon when viewed from the north to the south. 13. The main entrance on Elkhorn Avenue will be reconstructed to intersect basically perpendicular to Elkhorn and to directly oppose Filbey Court (to the North). A westbound, left turn lane will be constructed at the intersection with an opposing taper for the Elkhorn Lodge and Suites. 14. Vehicle and Pedestrian Access to and from the site will be improved. Walking to Downtown shopping and activities will be encouraged. An off-site (south side Elkhorn Ave) 10’ wide multi-modal path is proposed Easterly to a new Pedestrian Crossing near the existing Big Horn Restaurant (also provided will be a Ped Crossing of Elkhorn Ave at the realigned new entrance intersection with Filbey Ct.). HOTEL USES: The existing and proposed hotel buildings/units “fit” the allowed Accommodations uses in a mixed use PUD CO Zoning District Development. The number of hotel units proposed overall is less than allowed for the PUD as a whole. RESTAURANT USES: The 3 Restaurant pads shown on the Development Plan are intended for use as sit down restaurants. These “fit” the allowed uses in the underlying CO Zoning District and as part of the Mixed PUD regulations. Grease Interceptors are required by the Estes Park Sanitation District Regulations and are planned for with this Development. COMMERCIAL USES: The Event Center Barn, Horse Barn/Livery, Hillside Retail Space, Schoolhouse and Old Church will be open and available to the public for events/rides. The events can be scheduled by the public at the Event Center Barn, Schoolhouse or Old Church. Tours at the Schoolhouse and Old Church will be available. These uses are allowed and fit in the CO Zoning District of the code. SUBDIVISION PROPOSED: The proposed subdivision allows for single family use in the Southeast corner of the property (Lots 9 through 13). Should the owner wish to sell lots in the future (although not the intent), this PUD and Page 67 Page 5 of 9 Subdivision process will allow for that. Initially (upon approval), the houses on these 5 lots are intended to be nightly rental units or employee housing. DOWNTOWN PLAN COMPATIBILITY: Below is an excerpt from the 2018 Downtown Plan: The subject property is mentioned several times in the current Downtown Plan. It is mentioned that the Elkhorn Lodge is a “Community Anchor with historic potential”. The Downtown Plan also mentions the following relative abbreviated goals (that this project includes): •Economic Vitality – year round economy of business. •Maintain or gain adequate infrastructure. •Maintain views to rivers and mountains. •Protect Wildlife patterns and sensitive areas. •Expand links to abutting neighborhoods. •Maintain resilience to flooding. •Improve safety and connectivity for peds and bikes through enhanced crossings. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPATIBILITY: Here is an excerpt from the 1996 Comprehensive Plan (Area 7): Significant community landmarks and historic structures which should be preserved are located downtown. While commercial development exists throughout the area, large scale retail (or “big box”) type development is encouraged to locate at Stanley Village. The Downtown Planning area is intended to develop as an exciting, mixed-use, urban core with open space along the rivers, and structures such as the Stanley Hotel providing an intimate, pedestrian scale. We believe this plan does provide the basic intent of Area 7 goals; however, the Elkhorn Lodge is on the very western fringe of Area 7 in the Comp Plan. ACCESS AND TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) SUMMARY: Currently, the existing Lodge (600 West Elkhorn Ave) gains access from West Elkhorn Avenue. This project proposes to re-align the existing Eastern access onto Elkhorn Avenue to a more perpendicular approach. This will improve driver, bicycle and pedestrian safety. The Northern Elkhorn and current Stable Access includes a one lane concrete double T constructed bridge with concrete abutments. This bridge has been visually examined by Van Horn Engineering and found to be in good shape. A Structural loading analysis is forthcoming, however, we believe it is capable of supporting a fire truck in its current condition. This access will be gated and signed as an Emergency Page 68 Page 6 of 9 Access only. A new western access to Old Ranger Road is proposed which will increase emergency access and safety for the site and neighboring uses. The western access will not be signed, so is predicted to see little traffic. The TIS calls for an additional left hand turn lane at the main Elkhorn Access with 100 feet of storage, but did not find Warrants were met for a signalized intersection to be installed. The turn lane is shown on the proposed plans for this development. OPEN SPACE: Open space is not required with CO zoned land, but it is required with the PUD as proposed. This development provides approximately 41% open space where 30% is the Code requirement. UTILITIES: This property is currently serviced by all of the main utilities. The main lines will be accessible for connection and or extension as needed to easily serve the proposed density. A brief description of each utility and the associated changes is included: •Sewer. Several meetings with the Estes Park Sanitation District Representatives (and even the Sanitation Board) have been accomplished. The results of these meetings and discussions are as follows: o Communications continue on the agreement for the new river crossing as well as the needed easement across the Plaza Property for the new 12” sewer main. This will eliminate the current situation where the sewer main crosses directly under the historic Antonio’s Pizza Building (now owned by Maxwell’s). o The Sanitation District has stubbed the buried line out of the new manhole north of the old Pizza shop, but the stub ends east of the river (a future river crossing is required). o Minimum 8” diameter services are proposed into three locations on the proposed large motel building. Other smaller diameter service lines are shown and outlined on Sheet 4 (Utility Plan). All new manholes and main lines will be installed according to EPSD Standards and become property of the sanitation district upon successful acceptance by them. o Some realignment of the sewer line and an upgrade to 12” diameter sewer line crossing the property from west to east is shown and outlined on the Utility Plan mentioned above. It will be upgraded to the easterly side of the new Event Center Barn o Appropriate sewer easements will be dedicated with the Subdivision Plat. •Water/Fire Suppression. Five new fire hydrants are proposed to be added. The current eastern fire hydrant (near the Coach House) will be re-used with the proposed new waterline loop that is proposed to connect to the 6” line on the property to an existing 12” main to the East. There will also be a loop around the Elkhorn Lodge building that will service the rest of the new buildings. Fire sprinklers are proposed for each commercial building (except the new horse barn) with a special connection for fire department access outside each building near the sidewalk. This includes each of the three proposed sections of the large new hotel building. Each section of the large building is proposed to also include 2 hour automatically closing (Mag Lock) separation doors. •Gas. There is an existing 2” gas main crossing the property. That line currently serves the Coach House, the existing and the old Lodge (that will be removed). The current 2” line does not serve the existing barn. All new construction will connect to this existing 2” gas main and no relocation of it is proposed. •Electricity. Individual meters are proposed for each building. Currently, overhead power comes from the north and east and will remain. A buried three phase loop is provided for Page 69 Page 7 of 9 through the new construction around the south side of the large motel building on the property. One new overhead line is proposed south of the new large hotel building, otherwise, all new power on site will be buried as shown on the Utility Sheet (Sheet 4). •Cable and Telephone. Telephone and Cable TV come into the property from the east overhead, but will be buried from the Northeast corner of the Riverside Restaurant throughout the interior of the re-developed property. A separate connection for each building is proposed as well as individual billing. PARKING: This project is proposing to exceed the EVDC requirements for the associated uses and parking numbers. In short, the Code requires 335 spaces and this plan provides 360 spaces. Parking (for all uses) is tabulated on Sheet 1 and exceeds the EVDC required minimum by 107%. STORMWATER: This property is adjacent to the Fall River and generally slopes south to north toward the river. Three proposed north outlet facing western storm water culverts daylight through the proposed river retaining wall. The east most storm water culvert outlets or daylights into the wetland area west of the proposed realigned main entrance-exit. A cross culvert at the new main access will allow surface water to flow east to west and out of the sump area that currently exists. A culvert will be installed under the access road to Old Ranger to accommodate a new public drainage study for the Elkhorn Estates area. Given that Fall River separates the proposed improvements from Elkhorn Avenue, storm drainage improvements are not proposed along the south side of Elkhorn Avenue along this project’s frontage. There is little to no erosion evidence that would suggest that Curb and Gutter would be helpful along this river frontage of the property related to erosion. We feel that sheet flow from the highway should be allowed to flow freely in a distributed non erosive manner as it has historically. No Storm water detention is proposed with this development; however, water quality is proposed to be addressed through the use of relatively flat and wide grass lined swales and downstream naturally shallow flat sheet flow areas north of the proposed river wall. A Preliminary Drainage Report is submitted with this application and a Final Drainage Report will be submitted later in the process with the construction drawings. SCHEDULE: This development is proposed as a single phased sequenced development with the desire to commence construction in the fall of 2020 (upon Planning Commission and Town Board approvals). The owner would like to build everything right away, however due to floodplain issues, some things have to occur in a specific order. Building permits will be applied for sequentially, starting with the Elkhorn Suites, Elkhorn Lodge remodel and the new Horse Barn while the retaining wall is being built. With the horse stalls up and running in their new location, the Hillside Retail/Restaurant, Coach House Restaurant and building relocations will be done. Once the retaining wall construction and floodplain re-alignment is approved through FEMA via the LOMR process, the new Event Center Barn, Elkhorn Lodge addition and Riverside Restaurant construction will commence. As contractors are available, Alpine units will be remodeled one by one. REQUESTED WAIVERS (and related notes): Page 70 Page 8 of 9 1. Highway Frontage Sidewalk, Appendix D Typical Street Section (with Curb and Gutter). As mentioned within, no curb and gutter, sidewalk or street widening is proposed along Elkhorn Avenue north of the river adjacent to this proposed development and along Old Ranger Rd. a. This project does not propose an Elkhorn Avenue/Old Ranger Rd frontage sidewalk adjacent to the project west of the new main entrance. In lieu of this typical standard requirement, the project proposes to provide a 10’ wide concrete multi-modal path along Elkhorn including the south side of the new entrance and eastward toward a Pedestrian Crossing near the Bighorn Restaurant and connect the sidewalk to Mrs. Walsh’s Garden. A new Pedestrian Crossing is also proposed at the new main entrance across Elkhorn Avenue. b. EVDC Appendix D-5 allows the location of sidewalks on a property to be determined in a case-by-case basis. c. This highway frontage sidewalk ‘waiver’ is felt reasonable given there is a relatively new and wide concrete sidewalk on the north side of Elkhorn Avenue in this area and no sidewalk along Elkhorn Avenue to the east. At one location the river is very close to the south edge of the existing road, and any widening would impact the river there. This project is proposing improvements to the east instead due to the volume of pedestrian traffic that will be heading toward town where there currently is no sidewalk. Request for waiver from installing sidewalk on W. Elkhorn along the property frontage, including along Old Ranger Drive, is approved by public works since the developer has agreed to install a 10’ multi-use path between Elkhorn Lodge and Mrs. Walsh’s Garden. This trade-off advances the goals and purposes of the Code per D.I.D.1. 2. EVDC Section 4.4.D.2.a Main Entrance shall be oriented to the front lot line. The building on Lot 6 faces north and south with its main restaurant entrance up higher on natural sloping ground for the handicap access there at this building corner for the upstairs restaurant use. The handicap space for the downstairs retail use is located lower and to the north of the building along the street frontage. 3. EVDC Table 4.7 Loading space requirements. No loading spaces are proposed with this development. The Developer’s experience is that very early morning deliveries are made in front of or to the side of restaurants and/or hotel and this is a common and acceptable method of supply delivery with minimal guest interference. 4. EVDC Table 4-5 Max Building Height. The Elkhorn Suites building will be up to 38’ tall and will need a waiver from the EVDC through the PUD section of the code. The building is built against a hillside that shields it from any properties to the south. It is blended into the contours of the property against the hillside. The only buildings behind it are existing residential structures on this property. The adjacent property has a house relatively close to this property, but it is roughly 60’ higher in elevation than the proposed Suites. 5. EVDC Appendix D.III.B.6.d The road that accesses the Alpine Lots 9-13 must be built to street standards if it serves more than four residential units. We request that this be kept as a driveway, paved to 20’, with no sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curvilinear requirements. The area is quite steep, rocky and tree’d with little room for parking spaces let alone sidewalks, curb and gutter. It is desired by the applicant to keep the area as similar to the feel it currently has. We propose that the driveway have curb and gutter up to the parking area for the Old Church, but be a driveway beyond the entrance to the Old Page 71 Page 9 of 9 Church parking area. We will make a 20’ wide paved drive following the existing driveway. Request for waiver regarding allowing a shared driveway for more than four (4) single- family residential units (D.III.B.6.d.) is approved by Public Works. This arrangement is consistent with long-established access for buildings on a hill and thus relieves practical difficulties in redeveloping this site (D.I.D.2.). 6. EVDC Appendix D.III.B.4.a.1 The driveway serving Lots 8-13 is designed at 14.7% grade to match the existing drive. It is proposed to be widened from 14’ to 20’ in width and will include roadside drainage. Code maximum is 12% and Code width is 20’ minimum. The slope of the hill is approximately 20% and there is not enough room to redesign the road to meet the grade requirements without clearing many trees on the hillside and creating substantial cuts and fills. It is desired by the applicant to keep the area as similar to the feel it currently has. It would maintain as much of the screening for the property to the south as well. Request for waiver for the slope of the regraded driveway to be limited to a maximum of 12% (D.III.B.4.a.(1)) is approved by Public Works. The existing driveway is long- established at approximately 14.7%. This approval results in less visual impact, more effective environmental or open space preservation, and relieves practical difficulties in redeveloping this site (D.I.D.2.). 7. EVDC Section 7.6 Wetland disturbance at the new entrance–exit is proposed at only 2475 s.f. (0.06 Acres). We have worked with Darcy Tiglas for wetland identification. Her letter calls this area Sampling Point B and it is determined to be a wetland. Given the small size of this impact (less than 0.1 acres), disturbance is allowed without a permit and mitigation is not required by the US Army Corp of Engineers. A supporting document has been provided by Darcy Tiglas to mention it is likely not even under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corp of Engineers. Since it is allowed under applicable federal laws or regulations, we request a waiver to disturb this small portion of wetland. The purpose of the wetland disturbance is to re-align the current drive with Filbey Ct. This will produce a safer perpendicular approach and intersection with West Elkhorn Ave. It is also recommended in the 2018 Downtown Plan as mentioned above. 8. EVDC Appendix B.VI.A.5 Architectural Elevations. Architectural Elevations were not prepared for the Event Center Barn and the Horse Barn because this was a last minute change to the plan before submitting. The original plan was to remodel the old barn, however, moving it out of the floodplain became more important. When that decision was made, it was decided to make two separate barns, one for events and one for the livery operations. Architecturally, the barns are intended to look like the existing barn, so elevations did not seem necessary since there is an example already on site. The elevations were not prepared for the Lodge Addition either because it is intended to look like the old lodge. This project is attempting to maintain the historical feel and architecture on the site. Page 72 1043 Fish Creek Road • Estes Park, CO 80517 • 970-586-9388 • Fax: 970-586-8101 • E-mail: vhe@airbits.com July 9, 2020 To whom it may concern, This letter is intended to address the comments from Public Work’s memo dated March 6th, 2020 under the “Technical Corrections” section and changes from Planning Commission conditions. Elkhorn Lodge Subdivision: 1. We can’t change the word “you” because that phrase is a direct quote from state staututes. It is a quote that the state requires we put on all surveys. 2. I added a few more ROW labels, including the area located along the driveway from Elkhorn Ave to the property. All indications we have found tell us that it is public right- of-way. Elkhorn Lodge PUD: Sheet 1 of 8 1. We added the approval statements from public works to our waiver requests on the PUD and the Statement of Intent. 2. Updated! Thanks. Sheet 2 of 8: 1. Added a note about the current position of Fall River. Sheet 3 of 8: 1. I believe I have corrected the term floodwall with retaining wall in all instances on sheet 2, 3, 4 and 6. 2. It is a new 20’ paved drive, check. 3. Added a no parking sign, check. Sheet 5 of 8: 1. The cross walk at bighorn restaurant is lined up to be between the two ash trees. Both should be okay. There will be some shrubbery removal though. 2. Eight signs have been placed for the pedestrian crossings. It is understood they may be a work in progress with consultation with Public Works. The exact locations can be worked out at construction phase. VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING LAND SURVEYS SUBDIVISIONS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IMPROVEMENT PLATS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SANITARY ENGINEERING MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING ATTACHMENT 4 Page 73 1043 Fish Creek Road • Estes Park, CO 80517 • 970-586-9388 • Fax: 970-586-8101 • E-mail: vhe@airbits.com 3. The sidewalk at Filbey is in the ROW and in Outlot B of the Fall River Village PUD from 2004. Outlot B allows for pedestrian access so this is permitted on that property. The sidewalk crossing location can be discussed more at construction phase. 4. The typical cross section for Elkhorn Ave has been updated to include a “Match Thickness” along with a “4” minimum”. Also, the curb and gutter has been changed to be 2’ pan and ½’ curb. The private drive and parking lot will remain a 1 ½’ pan. The curb and gutter in the area varies greatly. There are sections out there that are 1 1/2’ pan. 2’ pan and 2 ½’ pan. CDOT typical curb and gutter allows for any width of pan. It just needs to be sloped at 1” per foot for inflow. 5. Added more labels for existing Right-Of-Ways, especially for the section of the driveway from Elkhorn Ave to the property. Also showed the right of way for Rock Ridge Rd. 6. The developer is proposing to install the pullout. At this point additional amenities are not planned. Signage will be provided, or installed. The town may have signs for the Brown Route that we could use. Sheet 6 of 8: 1. A thorough search of text overlaps with each other and with other linework was done and adjusted. Hopefully it is more legible. 2. A legend was added to this sheet. Additional changes made include: 1. We added two more dumpster locations. The original one was located on the north side of the existing Elkhorn Lodge. It was originally planned to serve the entire PUD. It will remain, but two more have been added. One on the north side of the Coach House and one to the north of the west side of the new Elkhorn Suites in the parking lot. These new trash locations take up four parking spaces. This project still has an excess of parking spaces though. 2. The Riverside restaurant has been moved approximately 4’ west to accommodate for the staircase on the east side of the restaurant. It was not noticed by the engineer at the previous submittal. In order to meet setbacks, it had to be moved west and the west property line between Lot 3 and Lot 2 had to be adjusted as well. 3. Per Planning Commission conditions, several trees were added along the retaining wall north of the existing Elkhorn Lodge to provide a screening and light blockage for properties to the north. Per the code, internal parking lots do not need perimeter screening if they are not adjacent to the lot lines, however, these trees were added to accommodate the request by the neighbors to the north. Perimeter screening requires 1 tree per 30’. With 360’ of parking along this area, 12 conifer tress were added to provide light screening year round. This outlines all the changes that have been made for revision. If you have any questions, please call me at 970-443-8210 x13. Sincerely, Joseph W. Coop For Van Horn Engineering and Surveying Inc. Page 74 Submittal Date: Pre-Application (check application type(s))Minor Subdivision Plat Condominium Map Development Plan Amended Plat Preliminary Map Special Review Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat Final Subdivision Plat Other: Please specify Project Description Lot Size Proposed Land Use Town Well None Town Well None Existing Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD UTSD Septic None Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD UTSD Septic Existing Gas Service Other None Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Name of Primary Contact Person Email Primary Contact Person is Owner Applicant Consultant/Engineer Application Fee 1 copy, 11" X 17" reduced set of plat/plans ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Application Type(s) Boundary Line Adjustment Site Information Xcel Rezoning Petition General Information Project Name Supplemental Map Community Development Department Phone: 970-577-3721 I Email: planning@estes.org I www.estes.org/CommunityDevelopment Statement of Intent Digital copies PDF emailed to planning@estes.org Contact Information Other (specify) Project Address Parcel ID # Legal Description Refer to the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for application submittal requirements. Town of Estes Park I P.O. Box 1200 I 170 MacGregor Avenue I Estes Park, CO 80517 Existing Land Use Existing Water Service Attachments Proposed Water Service 3 copies, 24" x 36" (folded) of plat/plans Other (specify) Revised 2017.01.09 KT 3OHDVHFKHFNRQO\RQHER[ x Elkhorn Suites Redevelopment of Elkhorn Lodge to a 205 Unit Mixed Use Hotel Development 600 West Elkhorn Ave See Plat 3526106001 18.583 acres Mixed Use Residential, Accommodation, Stable, Event and Restaurant Expanded Residential, Accommodation, Stable, Event and Restaurant x x x x C-O(Commercial Outlying)C-O(Commercial Outlying) Joe Coop, Van Horn Engineering joe@vanhornengineering x x x x x x X Final PUDx 2/20/2020 ATTACHMENT 5 Page 75 Consultant/Engineer PLEASE PRINT: PLEASE PRINT: Date Date Ź Ź Ź Ź PLEASE PRINT: PLEASE PRINT: Date Date Record Owner Article 65.5 of Title 24 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to provide notice of the application and initial public hearing to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. Notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development and meet the statutory requirements. Phone Record Owner(s) Email Signatures: I hereby certify that the provisions of Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Contact Information Phone Mailing Address Record Owner Applicant As Applicant, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the record owner(s) of the property. Names: Mailing Address Applicant Email Email Record Owner Phone Mailing Address Applicant Signatures: I grant permission for Town of Estes Park employees, reviewing agency staff, Planning Commissioners, members of the Town Board of Trustees, or Larimer County Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and am aware that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule may result in my application beying delayed or any approval of my application becoming null and void. Names: Applicant OWNER & APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Record Owner Applicant As Owner, I certify the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and I am the record owner of the property. Revised 2017.01.09 KT OWNER 2-20-20 Justin Mabey 2-20-20 Zahourek Conservatory, LLC, Carol Zahourek, Contact 4225 Fawn Trail, Loveland, CO 80537 970-215-5215 CAROLZAH@YAHOO.COM, VALZAHOUREK@GMAIL.COM East Avenue, Development, LLC, A Texas LLC Van Horn Engineering 1043 Fish Creek Rd, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-586-9388joe@vanhornengineering.com 1001 Cypress Creek Rd, Suite 203 Cedar Park, TX 78613 JUSTIN@EASTAVENUE.COM Justin Mabey Page 76 Page 77 Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Development Review Elkhorn Lodge Final Plat and PUD – Round 2 July 21, 2020 Summary This review by Public Works is based on plans and documents submitted to the Town in June and July, 2020. The revised drawings and floodplain information together make a complete submittal as requested. The model report and data files were provided to Galloway, consultant to Public Works for floodplain modeling analysis and guidance on regulatory processes relating to FEMA. Submittals from Van Horn Engineering and Surveying referenced and acknowledged for this review include: Flood Model Report (6/5/20; revised 7/13/20) Electronic data files for flood analysis model (delivered 6/5/20; revised delivered 7/14/20) Town of Estes Park Floodplain Development Permit (draft, 7/13/20) Memo addressing 7/1/20 Galloway comments about report and model data (7/13/20) Elkhorn Lodge Subdivision drawing – 1 sheet (02/20/20; revised 07/09/20) Elkhorn Lodge P.U.D. drawings – 8 sheets (02/20/20; revised 07/09/20 except Sheet 8) Statement of Intent (revised 07/06/20) Letter addressing 3/6/20 Public Works comments – Round 1 (7/9/20) Previous Public Works comment documents are applicable: Preliminary Plat and PUD – February 12, 2020 (Round 1) Preliminary Plat and PUD – Revised February 17, 2020 (Round 2) Final Plat and PUD – February 26, 2020 Final Plat and PUD – March 6, 2020 (Round 1) Previous Galloway comment documents are applicable: Memorandum – Preliminary Floodplain Report Review Comments (2/4/20) Memorandum – Flood Model Report Review Comments (7/1/20) Public Works, in consultation with Galloway, finds that the complete submittal provides enough information to justify recommending approval of the Final Plat and PUD. All previous comments remain applicable for the stipulations below: Recording of the Final Plat: 1)The Improvement Agreement (aka Development Agreement) must be executed (EVDC §10.5 K.3) with public improvements financially secured (§10.5 K.2). 2)A Maintenance Agreement for shared driveways must be recorded (EVDC Appendix D, III.B.6.c). Construction Plans: 1)No building permits will be issued until Construction Plans are approved (EVDC Appendix D, IX.A). 2)A complete Town of Estes Park Floodplain Development Permit application must be submitted with the Construction Plans; the application must include a ‘No-Rise’ certification (see Galloway comments below). ATTACHMENT 6 Page 78 2 | Elk h o r n L o d g e – P u b l i c W o r k s C o m m e n t s 7 / 2 1 / 2 0 Development Agreement: No building permits will be issued until the Improvement Agreement is executed (§10.5 K.3). Floodplain Regulations: The Town’s Floodplain Regulations (Municipal Code, Chapter 18.04) are applicable. No construction disturbance in the floodplain is allowed until the Town has issued a Floodplain Development Permit for the work. Ongoing guidance and requirements from Galloway are applicable throughout the development process as requested by Public Works: Floodplain Report Approval (7/21/20): Galloway has completed its review of the “Flood Model Report Flood Source: Fall River” [Van Horn Engineering & Surveying, Inc., July 13, 2020] provided in support of the Elkhorn Lodge Development PUD and Plat. The following comments are provided: 1.Page 3. The last sentence at the bottom of the page is incomplete. An updated version of this sentence can be provided in an email and revised in any future addendums or revisions to the report. 2.Based on our review of the effective floodplain delineation, the best available information, and the plans attached to the July 13, 2020 report; the proposed improvements will not place insurable structures in the effective and best available floodplains. 3.Based on the limited available guidance from FEMA for managing 2D modeled floodplains within the NFIP; the July 13, 2020 Elkhorn Lodge floodplain report meets the intent of and supports current NFIP requirements for no-rise due to encroachments within the best available floodway. As construction plans are developed and finalized for the project the following recommendations are provided: 1.Updates to this July 2020 floodplain modeling report and associated hydraulic analyses should be made to reflect any changes to the PUD/Plat/drawings attached to this report that are made during the development of final construction drawings. 2.A ‘No-Rise’ certification, stamped by the hydraulic Engineer of Record, should be provided with the revised Elkhorn Lodge floodplain modeling report supporting the final construction plan set. Page 79 ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. PORTIONS OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 26, OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF ELKHORN PROPERTY NE S 26 1 4 5-73 OWNER LEGEND i & liii!il UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY POLE 1l> BE REMOVED NEW ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER NEW PRIMARY JUNCTION CABIIET c:m:J NEW/EX. FIBER OPTIC JUNCTION BOX Ii) NEW EI...ECTRIC PEDESTAL i NEW LIGHT POLE PUU. BOX 4:{'.-NEW LIGHT POLE -�· NEW/EX. CABLE PEDESTALm m NEW/EX. TELEPHONE PEDESTAL [j] 1ELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO BE REMOVED CE) NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (II (II NEW/EX. WATER SHUT OFF V,,J...V£. ti NEW/EX. FIRE HYDRANT EX. W,6,lER MANHOLE TO BE REMOVED © NEW/EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Is NEW SANITARY GREASE INTERCEPTOR � NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER TYPE-R ? DEUN£ATOR -STREET SIGN (OR A FIRE LANE SIGN) s SEWER LINE-EXISTING •SEWER LINE -NEW w WATER LINE-EXISTING WATER LINE -NEW G GAS LINE -EXISTING ---o---6'.S LINE - NEW --• ---STORM SEWER -NEW --a<• __ OVERHEAD IJTILITY LINES (lEI..£. CABLE AN>/OR ELECTRIC) --Otll --OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES TO BE REMO\IED --EiC __ NEW BURIED ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE &: CABLE --• ---NEW BURIED ELECTRIC SERVICE TO INCLUDE CABLE IND TELEPHONE -a---o---FENCE-EXISTING � FENCE-NEW -- - ---BUILDING SETBACK - - - - - -EASEMENT (AS NOTED) -----------EXISTING 10' CONTOUR INTERVAL -----------EXISTING 2' CONTOUR INTERVAL ------ FINISH GRADE CONTOUR ------ROAD OR DRIVE ------ PROPERTY LINE -- --NEW IN1ERNAL PROPERTY LINES ----------NEIGHBOR PROPERTY LINE 0 • ® 0 00.00 {00.00) FOUNJ MONUt.lENT 1'S NOTED FOUNJ #4 REBAR WITH 1 "PLASTIC CAP LS f26974 SEr f4 REBAR WrTH 1 " PLASTIC CAP LS f26974 FOUNJ ALIQUOT OR HGHWAY R-0-W MARKER MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS PI.ATIED OR DEEDED DIMENSIONS CONCRETE PAVING AND TRASH DUMPSTERPAD W/ FENCED ENCLOSURE ARCHITECT: VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" -600' Lot Uses Lot 1: This lot will contain a new 8,100sf Event Center Barn to replace the old born that is being removed from the floodplain. It is similar in size and will be used for events such as weddings, corporate outings, Lozy-8 sing-a-longs and other similar events. The old bom will be raised and salvaged for as much material as possible to re-side the new born and odd old-time stable character to the building. The new building is intended to look like the existing barn on the exterior. The floorspace will be significantly different since it will be on event center now instead of a horse stable. This use is permitted in the CO zone and will be consistent with the new Event Center code language. Lot 2: This lot contains the existing Elkhorn Lodge and several outbuildings, mostly used for wrangler housing and offices. The Lodge willbe kept and on addition will be placed on the west side. The other outbuildings will be removed. The addition is intended to blend with the old lodge as much as possible. The original 29 units, ballroom, lobby, dining room and kitchen in the Lodge will be remodeled and the addition will contain 36 new units. Three on-site cabins will be relocated to the west of the old Lodge and remodeled for guest stay, The original Schoolhouse will be relocated os well and will be used as a small event facility and historic tours. An outdoor pool will be located at the center of all the structures. Lot 3: This lot contains the original residence for the property prior to the Elkhorn Lodge being constructed. It will be raised and a new Riverside Restaurant will be constructed in its place. The restaurant will be approximately 6,040sf in a two story structure. Lot 4: A new 1,800sf Horse Born will be constructed to continue the livery stables on the property. It will be constructed on the southwest portion of the lot with the north portion to be mostly a corral for the horses. The building will hO\le the same character andcolors of the old born and the new event center, however it will be hove stables and a small office and bathroom for the livery's business operations. It will be open to the public with perking provided, however, it is anticipated that a majority of the customers willcome from this property, likely walking to the livery. This is o use permitted by S2 in the CO zone, however since it is on e1dsting historical use, an S2 should not required. The PUD hos a similar review process to an S2, so it is being seen and reviewed by thesome authorities as would an S2. Lot 5: This will be the flagship lot that will contain the new 132 unit Elkhorn Suites. There ore numerous cabins in the area, most of which will be demolished. Three of the "better' cabins will be relocated and remodeled, as well as the Schoolhouse, on Lot 2. The suites will be a three story building, in three sections. Each section will rise one story as the building progresses westerly to frt the contoura of the lot. A height waiver request through the PUC process is requested with this submittal as outlined later in the requested waivers. Lot 6: This lot w!II hove a new building that will contain some retail space below and a new restaurant, the Hillside Restaurant, above .The building will be roughly 5,760sf total. Lot 7: The Cooch House is the primary building on this lot and it will be remodeled in to o Restaurant. A small addition will be added on the south for additional kitchen and storage space. The basement is planned to be o distillery business. The building will be roughly5,750sf total. Lot 8: This lot contains the Old Church. It is widely believed to be the first church in Estes Park and it will be remodeled and used forsmall events and weddings and historical tours, much like the Schoolhouse that is being relocated and remodeled on Lot 2. Lot 9-13: These lots will be for each of the existing "Alpine" cabins on the hill along the south side of the property. Each of thecabins will be remodeled into single family residential structures as they currently exist. They will primarily be rentals, or employee housing, through the lodge business, however, in the future, they may be sold and available for full time residential ownership. The parking for all the commercial lots (1-8) and uses will be shared by the individual lots. There is adequate parking distributed throughout the site on Lots 1-8 that con accommodate each of the uses in full operation. The residential lots (9-13) will hO\le their own private parking dedicated to their individual lots. The shored parking along with access will be addressed with a note on the plot.Maintenance will be addressed through a Property Owners Association. See the attached Preliminary Elkhorn Lodge PUD Subdivision Plotfor additional details. Elkhorn Lodge AC CESSORY USE CAL CULATIONS Re�sed 02-1 :l--202 P repapre1 ;�y Va., Hom E ngi1eering 12--05--2019 HOTS'L -8-RELATED USES GROSS AREA I BUIL □ING SQ. FT.I ELKl-sORI\ SUITES 112860 ELKI.ORN LODGE iEX .l 27264 ELKl-sORI\ LODGE IADDITl ON l 15.172 CHURCH 706 SCHOOLcl OUSE RELOCATED 052 UNITS RELOCATED rn E.06 RIVE R5IDE RE 5 TA!JRANT 6.C·40 COACH HOJSE RESTl'.R U./1.NT 3 :,50 COACH HOJ�': UI� I I LU:I{':' (l:lA�l::Ml::N I A.1<1::,C,.', :,,,.:,:uu HILLSIDE RES TA URANT 2,88 0 HILL-SIUI:: Rt: IAIL :,,,�!JU i!EW BA� BANQIJET FAC LITY(T\'1/0STORY\ 8.100 i!EW BA� HORSE FACILITY t.eOO I Uot al :;ros�Area 184.910 AC CESSORY I/SES {15%A LLOL--VEDJ 'NOT INCLUDING" RES TAIJRANTS' BUILDING SQ. FT.I ELKl-sORI\ SU ITES iL'"""'e Area. Eanouet Area. MO'S. EiC ... l 4.eo5 ELKl-sO RI\ LODGE IBanouet. k:I1chenta,:lllt les . din na hal. et ___ ) 6.864 CHUR CH 106 ZAHOUREK CONSERVATORY, LLC, CAROL ZAHOUREK, CONTACT 4225 FAWN TRAIL LOVELAND, CO 80537 DEVELOPER BASl S ARCHITECTURE 1692 BIG THOMPSON AVE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 (970)586-9140 HILLSIDE RET AIL ilEW BA� E'/ENT FAC ILITY ilEW BA� HORSE FACILITY I uot al 2.eao /0 STO 8.100 HOO 25.155 EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT LLC, JUSTIN MABEY, CONTACT 1001 CYPRESS CREEK RD CEDAR PARK, n< 78613 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: VAN HORN ENGINEERING & SURVEYING. INC 1043 FISH CREEK RD. ESTES PARK, CO 80517 (970)586-9388 JOE COOP, CONTACT STEVE LANE, CONTACT ARCHITECT: AE URBIA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS 909 W. SOUTH JORDAN PARK WAY SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH 84095 (801) 746-0456 RYAN MACKOWIAK, CONTACT ½ OF GR.:JS S AREA 13_60%1 RESTAURANT USES (25% ALLOWED) BUILDING SQ.FT, RIVE RSID E RES TAURANT 6,C40 C:OAC:I I I IOI.ISr Rl:-iTl'.Rll./1.NT :l,5� COACH HOUS:: DISTlLL ERY(BASE ME NT AREA:, 2,200 HILLSIDE RES TA URANT 2.eso I uot al 14.E-70 c;, OF GR.:JS S AREA 7_93%1 �:e�serl 02-1 :l--2010 AND THE NW 1/4 THE 6TH P.M. ESTES PARK, COLORADO LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM TITLE COMMITMENT (PER LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT NO. FCC25162932-3) THE PORTIONS OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNlY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 26, FROM WHICH POINT THE NE CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26 BEARS N 1 DEGREES 11' W A DISTANCE OF 373 FEET,ANO WHICH IS THE CENTER OF THE FALL RIVER ROAD Afj DESCRIBED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ELKHORN PROPERlY FOUND IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 696 AT PAGE 463, LARIMER COUNlY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF FALL Rr.iER ROAD AS FOLLOWS; N 84 DEGREES 30' W, A DISTANCE OF 321 FEET; THENCE S 88 DEGREES 03' WA DISTANCE OF 154 FEET; THENCE S 68 DEGREES 04' W, A DISTANCE OF 311 FEET; THENCE N 84 DEGREES 26' W A DISTANCE OF 114 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID ROAD, S 3 DEGREES 15' W A DISTNCE OF 877 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 47' E A OISTNACE OF 944.9 FEET TO THE SE CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4; THENCE N 1 DEGREES 11 ' W A DISTANCE OF 52 FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF THE PARCEL DEEDED FROM EDWARD J. WALSHANO DE H. SIMMONS TO JAMES AND ELEANOR HONDIUS RECORDED IN BOOK 501 AT PAGE 72, LARIMER COUNlY RECORDS; THENCE N 27 DEGREES 02' E A DISTANCE OF 235.5 FEET; THENCE N 18 DEGREES 34' E A DISTANCE OF 71.2 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL DEEDED FROM ELIZA E. WHITEHEAD TO MRS. ELL A JAMES RECORDED IN BOOK 77, AT PAGE 143, LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING MARKED WITI-l A 1 INCH STEEL PIPE SET BY ORIGINAL SURVEY; THENCE N 68 DEGREES 34' E A OISTANCE OF 82.3 FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF PARCEL DEEDED FROM FLORA AND J.R. STANLEY TO EDNA JAMES AND A.N. MCKEIRt.tAN RECORDED IN BOOK 639 AT PAGE 314; THENCE S 75 DEGREES 26' E A DISTANCE OF 273.3 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 34 FROM WHICH POINT THE NE CORNER OF SECTION 26 BEARSN 25 DEGREES 32' W A DISTANCE OF 1153.7 FEET; THENCE N 2 DEGREES 14' E A DISTANCE OF 207 FEET TO THE CENTER OF FALL RIVER; THENCE WESTERLY ANO NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTER OF FALL RIVER ALONG THE FLORA AND J.R. STANLEY PARCEL DEEDED TO EDNA JAMES AND A.N. MCKEIRMAN AND THE PARCEL DEEDED FROM FRANK W. GORE TO WILLIAN E JAMES RECORDED IN BOOK 110 AT PAGE 302, LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25; THENCE N 1 DEGREES 11' W A DISTANCE OF 65 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF CONTAINED IN THE AMENDED PLAT OF ELKHORN CLUB ESTATES, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF; EXCEPT THAT PARCEL CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1936 IN BOOK 639AT PAGE 314; EXCEPT THAT PARCEL CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 26, 1971 IN BOOK 1469 AT PAGE 785 EXCEPT RECORDED PLATS OF ELKHORN PLAZA LODGES CONDOMINIUMS, BUILDINGS A ANO 8. EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1987 AT RECEPTION NO. 87007530 EXCEPT THOSE PARCELS DESCRIBED IN DEEDS RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1947 IN BOOK 839 AT PAGE 334, 335 AND 338 FOR INFORMATION ONLY THE LARIMER COUNTY ASSESSOR ALSO INCLUDES IN THEIR LEGAL A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 25, 1979 IN BOOK 1924 AT PAGE 745 WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN CONVEYED TO CURRENT OWNER. STATISTICAL INFORMATION: ENTIRE PROPERTY 1. ZONING -ZONED CO, TO BE TREATED Afj MIXED USE PUC, WITH CO-COMMERCIAL OUTLYING, A-ACCOMODATIONS,AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN PUD GROSS PROJECT AREA -809,475 SF, 18.58 AC AREA UNDER FLOODPL,<JN -183,496 80% -146,797 NET PROJECT AREA = 809,475 -146,797 = 662,678 SF 2.AVERAGE SLOPE -8%±3.ALLOWABLE DENSITY, 1,800 SF /HOTEL UNIT, 9,000 SF /RESIDENTIAL UNITHOTEL UNITS SF= 197*1,BOO = 354,600 SF RESIDENTIAL UNIT SF = 5*9,000 = 45,000 SF TOTAL UNIT SF = 399,600 SF 4.TOTAL OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 335SEE PARKING SPREADSHEET FOR DETAILS 5.TOTAL OFF STREET PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 360 6.TOTAL ACCESSORY USE SF ALLOWED:SEE ACCESSORY USE SPREADSHffi FOR DETAILS TO LOWER LEFT7.MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT -30' UNLESS GREATER HEIGHT TO BE REVIEWEOIN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE EVDC REGULATIONS UNDER PUD'S8.MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED; 65%LOT COVERAGE TOTALS,BUILDINGS: 80,926 SF BUILDING DECKS/PATIOS; 10,753 SFPAVED DRIVE, 183,697 SF CONC SIDEWALKS WALKS/T RAI L; 18,585 SFTOTAL LOT COVERAGE, 293,962 SF TOTAL PERCENTAGE, 293,962 SF / 809,475 SF -36.3% CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL: JUSTIN MABEY, ON BEH ALF OF EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC BOARD OF TRUSTEES' CERTIFICATE: APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLOR ADO BY A RESOLU TION ADOPTED ON THIS ___ DAY OF _____ 20 TOWN CLERK MAYOR ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION: THESE PLANS FOR ELKHORN LODGE P.U.D. WERE PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROAD STANDARDS AND THE STORMWATER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE. LONNIE A. SHELDON. PE & PLS 26974 VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. INDEX OF SHEETS 1 COVER PAGE 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS DEMO 3 GENERAL SITE PLAN 4 WATERLINE, SEWER, ELEC, COMM & GAS 5 ELKHORN AVE IMPROVEMENTS 6 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 7 LANDSCAPE PLAN 8 FIRE TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATES FUD WAIV ER REQUESTS: 1.HIGHWAY FRONTAGE SIDEWALK, APPENDIX D TYPICAL STREET SECTION (WITH CURB AND GUTTER). AS MENTIONED WITHIN, NO CURB ANDGllTTER, SIDEWALK OR STREET WIDENING IS PROPOSED ALONG ELKHORN AVENUE NORTH OF THE RIVER ADJACENT TO THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG OLD RANGER RD. a. THIS PROJECT DOES NOT PROPOSE AN ELKHORN AVENUE/OLD RANGER RD FRONTAGE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT WEST OFTHE NEW MAIN ENTRANCE. IN LIEU OF THIS TYPICAL STANDARD REQUIREMENT, THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO PROVIDE A 10' WIDE CONCRETE MULTI-MODAL PATH ALONG ELKHORN INCLUDING THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NEW ENTRANCE AND EASTWARD TOWARD A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING NEAR THE BIGHORN RESTAURANT AND CONNECT THE SIDEWALK TO MRS. WALSH'S GARDEN. A NEW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IS ALSO PROPOSED AT THE NEW MAIN ENTRANCE ACROSS ELKHORN AVENUE. b.EVDC APPENDIX D-5 ALLOWS THE LOCATION OF SIDEWALKS ON A PROPERTY TO BE DETERMINED IN A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS. c. THIS HIGHWAY FRONTAGE SIDEWALK 'WAIVER' IS FELT REASONABLE GIVEN THERE IS A RELATIVELY NEW AND WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ONTHE NORTH SIDE OF ELKHORN AVENUE IN THIS AREA AND NO SIDEWALK ALONG ELKHORN AVENUE TO THE EAST. AT ONE LOCATION THE RIVER IS VERY CLOSE TO TI-IE SOUTH EDGE OF THE EXISTING ROAD, AND ANY WIDENING WOULD IMPACT THE RIVER THERE. THIS PROJECT IS PROPOSING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EAST INSTEAD DUE TO THE VOLUME OF PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE HEADING TOWARD TOWN WHERE THERE CURRENTLY IS NO SIDEWALK. (Request for waiver from installing sidewalk on W. Elkhorn along the property frontage, including along Old Ranger Drive, is approved by public works since the developer hos agreed to install a 1 o· multi-use path between Elkhorn Lodge and Mrs. Walsh's Garden. This trade-off advances the goals and purposes of the Code per D.I.D.1.) 2. EVDC SECTION 4.4.D.2.A MAIN ENTRANCE SHALL BE ORIENTED TO THE FRONT LOT LINE. THE BUILDING ON LOT 6 FACES NORTH ANDSOUTH WITH ITS MAIN RESTAURANT ENTRANCE UP HIGHER ON NATURAL SLOPING GROUND FOR THE HANDICAP ACCESS THERE AT THIS BUILDING CORNER FOR THE UPSTAIRS RESTAURANT USE. THE HANDICAP SPACE FOR THE DOWNSTAIRS RETAIL USE IS LOCATED LOWER ANO TO THE NORTH OF THE BUILDING ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. 3. EVDC TABLE 4.7 LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS. NO LOADING SPACES ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE DEVELOPER'SEXPERIENCE IS THAT VERY EARLY MORNING DELIVERIES ARE MADE IN FRONT OF OR TO THE SIDE OF RESTAURANTS AND/OR HOTEL AND THIS IS A COMMON AND ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF SUPPLY DELNERY W1TH MINIMAL GUEST INTERFERENCE. 4.EVOC TABLE 4-5 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT. THE ELKHORN SUITES BUILDING WILL BE UP TO 38' TALL AND WILL NEED A WAIVER FROM THEEVOC THROUGH THE PUD SECTION OF THE CODE. THE BUILDING IS BUILT AGAINST A HILLSIDE THAT SHIELDS IT FROM ANY PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH. IT IS BLENDED INTO THE CONTOURS OF TI-IE PROPERTY AGAINST THE HILLSIDE. THE ONLY BUILDINGS BEHIND IT ARE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY. THE ADJACENT PROPERTY HAS A HOUSE RELATIVELY CLOSE TO THIS PROPERTY,BUT IT IS ROUGHLY 60' HIGHER IN ELEVATION THAN THE PROPOSED SUITES. 5.EVDC APPENDIX D.111.B.6.D THE ROAD THAT ACCESSES THE ALPINE LOTS 9-13 MUST BE BUILT TO STREET STANDARDS IF IT SERVES MORE THAN FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS. WE REQUEST THAT THIS BE KEPT AS A DRIVEWAY, PAVED TO 20', WITH NO SIDEWALK, CURB ANO GllTTER, AND CURVILINEAR REQUIREMENTS. THE AREA IS QUITE STEEP, ROCKY AND TREE'D WITH LITTLE ROOM FOR PARKING SPACES LET ALONE SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER. IT IS DESIRED BY THE APPLICANT TO KEEP THE AREA AS SIMILAR TO THE FEEL IT CURRENTLYHAS. WE PROPOSE THAT THE DRIVEWAY HAVE CURB ANO GUTTER UP TO THE PARKING AREA FOR THE OLD CHURCH, BUT BE A DRIVEWAY BEYOND THE ENTRANCE TO THE OLD CHURCH PARKING AREA. WE WILL MAKE A 20' WIDE PAVED DRIVE FOLLOWING THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. (Driveway serving five (5) single-family lots. Request for waiver regarding ollowin9 a shored driveway for more than four (4) single-family residential units (D.I11.B.6.d.) is approved by Public Works. Thia arrangement is consistent with long-established access for buildings on o hill and thus relieves practical difficulties in redeveloping this site (D.I.0.2.).) 6. EVOC APPENDIX D.1I1.8.4.A.1 THE DRIVEWAY SERVING LOTS 8-13 IS DESIGNED AT 14.7% GRADE TO MATCH THE EXISTING DRIVE. IT ISPROPOSED TO BE WIDENED FROM 14' TO 20' IN WIDTH ANO WILL INCLUDE ROADSIDE DRAINAGE. CODE MAXIMUM IS 12� AND CODE WIDTH IS 20' MINIMUM. THE SLOPE OF THE HILL IS APPROXIMATELY 20% AND THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM TO REDESIGN THE ROAD TOMEET THE GRADE REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT CLEARING MANY TREES ON THE HILLSIDE ANO CREATING SUBSTANTIAL CUTS AND FILLS. IT IS DESIRED BY THE APPLICANT TO KEEP THE AREA AS SIMILAR TO THE FEEL IT CURRENTLY HAS. IT WOULD MAINTAIN AS MUCH OF THE SCREENING FOR THE PROPERlY TO THE SOUTH AS WELL (Request for waiver for the slope of the regraded driveway to be limited to a ma,cimum of 12% (D.I11.8.4.o.(1 )) is approved by Public Works. The existing driveway is long-established at oppro,cimately 14.7,t. This approval results in less visual impact, more effective environmental or open space preservation, and reli8\188 practical difficulties in redeveloping this site (D.I.D.2.).) 7. EVDC SECTION 7.6 WETLAND DISTURBANCE AT THE NEW ENTRANCE-EXIT IS PROPOSED AT ONLY 2475 S.F. (0.06 ACRES). WE HAVE WORKED WITH DARCY TIGLAS FOR WETLAND IDENTIFICATION. HER LETTER CALLS THIS AREA SAMPLING POINT 8 ANO IT IS DETERMINED TOBE A WETLAND. GIVEN THE SMALL SIZE OF THIS IMPACT (LESS THAN 0.1 ACRES), DISTURBANCE IS ALLOWED WITHOUT A PERMIT ANO MmGATION IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS. A SUPPORTING DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY DARCY TIGLASTO MENTION IT IS LIKELY NOT EVEN UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS. SINCE IT IS AU.OWED UNDER APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS, WE REQUEST A WAIVER TO DISTURB THIS SMALL PORTION OF WETLAND. THE PURPOSE OF THE WETLAND DISTURBANCE IS TO RE-AI..IGN THE CURRENT DRIVE WITH FILBEY CT. THIS WILL PRODUCE A SAFER PERPENDICULAR APPROACH AND INTERSECTION WITH WEST ELKHORN AVE. IT IS ALSO RECOMMENDED IN THE 2018 DOWNTOWN PLAN TO ALIGN THE NEW ENTRANCE WITH FlLBEY CT. 8. EVDC APPENDIX B.VI.A.5 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS WERE NOT PREPARED FOR THE EVENT CENTER BARNAND THE HORSE BARN BECAUSE THIS WAS A LAST MINlJTE CHANGE TO THE PLAN BEFORE SUBMITTING. THE ORIGINAL PLAN WAS TO REMODEL THE OLD BARN, HOWEVER, MOVING IT OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN BECAME MORE IMPORTANT. WHEN THAT DECISION WAS MADE, IT WAS DECIDED TO MAKE TWO SEPARATE BARNS, ONE FOR EVENTS AND ONE FOR THE LIVERY OPERATIONS. ARCHITECTURALLY, THE BARNS ARE INTENDED TO LOOK LIKE THE EXISTING BARN, SO ELEVATIONS DID NOT SEEM NECESSARY SINCE THERE IS AN EXAMPLE ALREADY ON SITE. THE ELEVATIONS WERE NOT PREPARED FOR THE LODGE ADDITION EITHER BECAUSE IT IS INTENDED TO LOOK LIKE THE OLD LODGE. THIS PROJECT IS ATTEMPTING TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORICAL FEEL AND ARCHITECTURE ON THE SITE. NOTES: 1.THE OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AD.A. AND I.B.C. 2.EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE LOCATED AT THE REQUIRED ENTRY POINTS OF THE NEW BUILDINGS, ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING AND WILL BE SHIELDED AND DEFLECTED DOWNWARD. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 7.9 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE IS REQUIRED. 3.ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED OR GUAR ANTEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EVDC SECTIONS 7.12 AND 10.5K. 4.PER SECTION 7.13, "CONDUIT, METERS, VENTS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING OR PROTRUDING FROM THE ROOF SHALL BE SCREENED, COVERED OR PAINTED TO MINIMIZE VISUAL IMPACTS." 5.FENCES AND WALLS FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE PREDOMINANT MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE BUILDINGS AND MEET APPLICABLE EVDC REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES. 6.APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S. AS AMENDED. 7.CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATION AND ARE SET ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988. 8.ALL BUILDIN GS/UNITS 'MLL HAVE A PLACARD ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING DESIGNATING THE UNIT NUMBER AND ADDRESS FACING THE DRIVEWAY AS APPLICABLE. 9.THE PROJECT IS ANTICIP ATED TO BREAK GROUND FOR CONSTRUCTION DURING THE SPRING/SUMMER OF 2020 AND IS AN TICIPA TED TO BE COMPLETED IN A SINGLE PH ASE. 10. THIS DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE 'MTH THE INTERNA TIONAL FIRE AND INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. 11.THIS DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE W1TH THE ESTES PARK MUNICIPAL CODE. 12.LIMITS OF DISTIJRB ANCE SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OR EXCAVA TION, GR ADING, OR CONSTRUCTION WITH CONSTRUC TION BARRIER FENCING OR SOME OTHER METHOD APPROVED BY STAFF. 13.STOCKPILING SHALL NOT OCCUR OUTSIDE THE DELINEATED LIMITS OF DISTIJRBANCE. 14. THIS P.U.D. IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY. IT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A LAND SURVEY NOR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, HOWEVER, VAN HORN ENGINEERING HAS COMPLETED AN ALTA SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 15.THE LOT IS CURRENTLY ZONED CO -COMMERCIAL OUTL YING. 16. ACCESS AND PARKING ACROSS LOTS 1-8 IN THE PUC SHALL BE SHARED BETWEEN LOTS 1-8. THERE WILL BE A BLANKET EASEMENT ACROSS THESE LOTS FOR THE ACCESS AND PARKING. >-'-' '-'rn "' "' , , � cw:!1 ill w 13 0: "'�z '-' :, '-' 0 It g� Vl c;j ;'., cl 13 "' 0:: 0: "'"'w a":, a. f,11,13 a.o" " ill WW " '-' '-' �Si 0 0 N N 0 0 � N N N 0 � 0 C) z ->-r--LI.I->8-a::: (X) � ::)0 '?Cl) 0"' <( (X) 0::"' cg� zoo�c-:; 0:: ,. C)<C x 0.. ;::i:z (/).-w a:::>--(X) LI.I Cl) (X) Wt') ...... 0) z _J, -□ro C) 0::"' z,,,� Ll.lwo w ....0:: 0) u�z ..a::: i:li !,! Oc;:� ::c � 0.. 0 -z t; t;, w ,w "' Vl "- DRAWN BY: JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE NA DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 1 OF 8 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 ATTACHMENT 7 Page 80 ', ' "---... I ',..,-,\_ ' I 'l '/ --J/i T □\JN □'JNED PR □PERTY \ \ • \ • \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \' \ I I \ I I I --,.., '---,,_____ --- - .,,, �OHIJ ------- ----CHU --, -------------------�-------------- '! ..... .-.-.-::::: .................... ........ . .,,,, ..... .-.-.-::::: ............................................................................. . . ·.·,•>••••·•··••·a'i,;pC ilil:••••ne-�••••Jt PRIMARY, ALL OVERHEAD BEYOND THIS PINT TO BE_/-�,g.i�D (EXCEPT PORTIONS_..---,,,-' NEAR ALF'�E UNITS ON HILL)---., \ ESTES VAl...lEY WATERSHED COAL.mON FENCED AREA /ESTES VALLEY WATERSHED COALITION FENCED AREA •-r.....' FENCE TO BE -RELOCATED NORTH • \ \ \ \ I I PROPOSED RETAINING WALL •• ' • ·,FlOODWAY �"'I, {lYPICAL) � �I WATERSHED COAUTION ':,I , ,,. OF PROPOSED I ' ;, \ 't 411 --., RETAINING WALL ........_ lI t ;,X... I \ • • - • -,,. .,_, I FLOODPLAIN '· ...... I I _,, �,\\ .. \ ZONE "AE" \ , . .,, 't:�, '--------✓�:=.�� •�-�(TY��) ' .. .. ,.. ',, ..,'(' � .. .// "1.\ .... ,',,' o\".'"--�-,,. ', \. \ .._.._ ', / FLOODPLAIN \I 1 , .. , \ \ \j \,.,""'�.;:,:_ ______ z(IYPON��)• / '--""\--,.. ',, ',, ............ -..;;1 , .... , '\. \\. ---' ·� ... � ,, ,, r,,---..................... ........ \ ",.J '----... .... .... ____ <Ill;'-'� -',,',, ',, ---.... �\ l \ I ', ',, , \ I ', I ,,.. ....... , .......... ,-..., '� � ' J ' ....... ........ .....---, ', '-,, ' / ------....... ', .... ,... -... _ ............... \ ...... \ ....... _ ................. ' -, ',, ', ,---,... .... .... ',', \ ., -, 'FEtif� TO BE RE't.0Gf.!ED\' \\ \ �.,. ',.., ,..._..., I \ \ --', '-....., I \ \ \ ,-... , ....... ..._ .. I \ \ ' ,,................ .............._ �'.:;'.""=,,;;;;,;1.;.;,',<�'-""'"-C::: � ', ', V ',, ..." .................... _',..._ I ', \ ', ..... --.... -''67 --.... ............ ' ' ... -.... 0 .... '-1 ' ', ', ,.,. ............ ..,_ .... __ ............... ' ' \ ...... .... .... .... .... ... ', \ .......... _ .... ....... .... ___ .,', ... ', J --....... ----... __ .............. \ .................... , ' ........... --... .... ........... :,,, ',, ,,',..f-............... ... ... ______ -............... _ ... ___ ,' ... , ', ', ',, ........ ... _ -............... .... .......... LOT 1 \ ', ' ' ... -----........ ....__ ---.. , ' ,, ' , '\ .. ',, ',... --...... ............. ---------P .... RO PER TY ' ' ' ' ', ', ........ _, ... ___ LOT 4 ....... ----. \ \ ' .... -... ... ... -------, ... ' ' ', ........... _ 2:':CJQS A.C -... c:'','' .... -.... .. .... ,,,, ........ , ....... , .... ----------1-8� 5'83--,(c RES I ', ', ',,........... ..., -....... .... .... ... ,,,, ... ,"_ ............................. _ ... ... ' .... ... \ -... ... -,,, ................... ... ,,,''"-...... .... \ \ \ \ \ ', .... , ....... ........... \ ' , ' \ .... , , ', 1s20 \ \ ' \ ... ....... ... --- ....... _ \ \ \ ' ' ' ... ... ... ...... -- -- , , , , , , ... , ... ...... -... -' ', \ \ ', ', ...... ', ....... _ ................ _ \ \ ' ', \ ... ' ... ... ---... ... ------------- ---------------- - ---------------------...0\ \ .... , '·@ ', ....... ---... ''' ttP ,' ' \ .. \ ' ... '-· ' .... ....__ ... \ ,,.� ' ... ' ... .... ...... ---... "''''' ... -\ ', .... ... ' ' ' ........ .... -- .... ------------------... ______ _------I I '''-'"''' ...... _ \ \ ' ' ). ' ' .... ... --___________ .......... , , , a· ............. ,, ........ ----... '', , o:'f ,,,,,, , __ ..... " ' ' ' .... .... \ -------\ ', ', ', ' ' ', ', ', ........... I ---...................... .._ I ' ' ,�, ', ' ...., ' ........ I ' \ ' s•P\ \ ', ', \ ,,\ .. ,,, .......', \ ' \ .... _ ... ,),,,,, ... ,, .... ,--,,,, \ --\ ', ', ... , ....... -, ... � ' 1 ' .... _ \ I I \ l ' I I ', I I ,-, \ --> -\ ' I 1 ', \ l�o•pI " > I • 1.5•p �� I ',.., ... ----------------- -, MODULAR CORRAL FENCES W�DER IN THIS AREA TO BE_ REMOVED \ \ \ \ l I I I I I I I I I ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. LOT 2 4.518 AC I l I I ' -·,, ' I I □1siE°r:lfto EX�DGE -REUSE IF;,.JN GOOD C6NDl!f()N ' s ' ' ',', ' .... _ Dl:SCOfNECT GAS I , ,- ... ------\ ,.x: .... 1 "ElXHORN LODGE. \ REMOVE□--.., ... \ ... --SIGN TO BE�-, \ WATERLINE TO BE , REt.tOVED FROt.t __...,,.. THIS POINT SOUTH I I I J p-<11� ""-? �! ' ' UNPLATTED PROPERTY (CHARLES D, CHAMBERLAIN, Ill, LAURA CHAAl:IERLAIN WRIGHT, AND MARV MARECEK) ZONED RE-1 'I I I I I I ' '\\ -- • \ I I I I 0 I I I I 'I I I I I NOTES: 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY. IT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A LAND SURVEY NOR ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT.2. LAND TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT NO. FCC25162932-3 WAS USED FOR OWNERSHIP ANDEASEMENT RESEARCH. 3.THE ZONING OF THIS LOT IS CO-COMMERCIAL OUTLYING, 40,0DO SF MINIMUM. THE BUILDING SETBACKS ARE FROM ALL SIDE AND REAR LOT LINES, 15' FROM NON-ARTERIAL STREETS AND 25' FROM ARTERIAL STREETS ANDRESIDENTIAL ZONED DISTRICTS. 4. THE POSTED ADDRESS IS 600 W. ELKHORN AVE, ESTES PARK, CO 15' 5.UTILITIES ARE SCHEMATIC. IT IS THE RESPONSIBIUlY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH THE UTlLllYCOMPANIES THE LOCATION OF THE UTILllY LINES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO MAINTAIN THOSE LINES IF AT ALLPOSSIBLE. 6. IT IS 1HE RESPONSIBILllY OF 1HE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT AND/OR RESTORE ALL PROPERlY CORNERS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 7. NO UTILl1Y LOCATES WERE OBTAINED AS PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY P.U.D. EFFORT. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED OFF OF SURFACE EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION OBT;JNED FROM ON SITE MANAGERS AND PREVIOUS VAN HORN WORK ON THE SUBJECT PROPERlY .8. 1HERE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE TREES LOCATED ON THIS PROPERlY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS PROPERlY. ONLY THOSE TRESS LOCATED NEAR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION HAVE BEEN LOCATED. -""" -.. ' SCALE: 1" 0 50 ---50' 100 .• :-� ,.· , .. .,. 150 . ......... :: ............ :: ............ :: ............ :: ............ :: .... .. .................. :: ............ :: ............ :: ............ :: .... ..·••:-:-:-::,:.:-:-:-:-:-::,:.:-:-:-:-:-::,:.:-:-:-:-:-::,:.:-:-:. .. , ...... , ...... , ...... , ... �=�, .. " ,�t I•••• ,,, ·-"'-� .... "-'.'--.,,, ''-.., .. '• "'<:, "',' :..-.,;:-__ � ........ ......___ .... '------=�-�"-:-.. /" -.... '\ ---(_ ... \. ' -',, > ,, -:--- >-" rn "' , �.., :,;::,z 0 0 " Vl It c;j ;'.,"' 0:: .., a. lil" " 0 N w 0 � N "' 0 0 C)z ->-r--LI.I->8-a::: (X) � ::)0 '? Cl) 0"' <( (X) a::"' cg� zoo �c:; a:: ..C)<C x (L ;::i: z (/). -w a::: >--(X) LI.I Cl) (X) Wt') LI.I. 0) z .J, -□roC) a::"'z,,,�Ll.lwo w"a:: 0) u�z ..a::: i:li !,!Oc;:�::c � (L 0 -z � j '1.. 0 � ·O r:z::I �o 0 :::> < . p:; 0 '1.. 0 � r:z::I ....::1 c;8 rn 0 z 0 .. ....::1 �0 z�...... E-i ...... p:; '1..Q z Orn0 :::0 r:z::Iu� E-iC, r:z::I �z ...... E-i rn >< t; t;; w r:z::I , w 0 I "' Ul <L DRAWN BY: JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 2 OF 8 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 Page 81 -�-> REMOVE •cHEVRON•SIGN NEW CULVERTSIZE TO BE DETERMINED \ .1 r--��;-;- -; ELKHORN CLUB rJ:J / EST4TES SUB. : (MARTIN D. MUSICK & / MARIE STEINBRECHER)ZONED E _.=...,.-::,,:!.,:;;,,,' ,,,,--. ,I..,._�----■■-■■--.. �,� .,,J!V. ..�... •• ... ----- 5' SIDEWALK(lYP) I I r -------��'-"""'-, __ •' I -_ -~--/ j___j__ NEW 1 O' UTILITY --� I I EASEMENT ----I -_ - �z 1·1 :ELKHORN LODGE- TOWN OWNED PROPERlY �,:� ./ PROPERTY �:ij O � 1 8;3;CRES d I rI I I�. I I I I NEW CORRAL �15•p 'U NEW 20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ESTES VALLEY WATERSHED COALmON FENCEO AREA LOT 1 PROPOSED ELXHORN SUITES 132 HOTEL ROOMS 5' SIDEWALK (lY P) ALL ALPINE Btm.DINGS ON RILL TO REIUIN AND BE REMODELED ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. 4·584 AC FFE=7605.67 0.379 AC - FIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND NO PARKING SIGN PROPOSEDELKHORN SUITES 132 HOTEL ROOMS --- -•-•-•-·-·-·-·-·-· PROPO RIVERSIDE RESTAURANT 6,040SF 94.5 ., .·, : I ·, . '" " LOT 8 0.472 AC " " " " " " " 1··"·. "" PA/i'J< I F'Q,;, ltvc (Q ; cotv0of I. ' " . I. ' I '' . I I ., I., I., / FENCED ENCLOSURE 0 0 FOR TRASH RECEPTACLE ,._� i UNPLATTED PROPERTY (RICHARD AND HELEN MORRISON LMNG TRUST) ZONED RE-1 60'± PUBLIC ROW SCALE: 1·50' 50 • • 100 REDIRECT TAPER FOR t£W TURN LANE \\ .... 150 EXISTING ELKHORN LODGE SIGN TO BE RELOCATED .. '.-:.) ,· : r: :;·� . -� • • "1t, . ¢ ·"'-� NEW � CROSSWALK >-rn z 0 Vl c;j 0::: � 0 �I Ul " .., 0 "It ;'., "' .., " 0 N 0 N DRAWN BY: C) z->-r--LI.I->8-a::: (X) � ::)0 '? Cl) 0"' <( (X) a::"' cg� zoo �c-:; a:: ..C)<Cx (L ;::i:z (/).-w a::: >-(X) LI.I Cl) (X) w.,, LI.I. 0) z .J, -oroC) a::"'z,,,�Ll.lwo w r--a:: 0) u�z .. a::: i:li !,! Oc;:� ::c � (L 0 -z JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 3 OF 8 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 Page 82 ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. -� ------ ' \' ' \ .' ------- \ ' ) ., I I·'I I I � • 1/j I•I I r--------------------- ' ' crJ /, ' I , ' r/> -- EX. SEWER 111 SERVICE G�cTRIC SERVICE TO NEW BARN •5• FIRE LINE UNLESS SPECIFIED / OTHERWISE BY MECHANICAL__,,,/' AND A ¾• SERVICE FDC (T,'P) ELKHORN LODGE PROPERTY 4• SEWER SERVICE 18.583 ACRES LOT 4 2. o o 5 re I I I�-o I \ 0 NEW 10 KVA 14' TRANSFORMER I I I I I I EXISTING I OVERHEAD I UTILITY I LINE I I I I I I I I I • \0 .. � .. , .. ·•.· . '··.• 4. ,·,. 1----=--I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEAD END POLE \ 0 AERIAL TO NEW ___,.,.r' UNDERGROUND / 34' PRIMARY / ..- , .', .. , •.. ALL ALPINE Btm.DINGS ON RILL TO REIUIN AND BE REMODELED BUILDINGS TO CONTINUE TO BE SERVICED BY OVERHEAD POWER AND PROPANE GAS ''"" ..... •;. ..... \ / ............... -•""'"""'" : .... � "'""""""•,� '' \,, �' ··, � "� '<�---�--=--� ''••.�-----:::: ..... --,,:-=---"---'� ............ \ """"-.,....�� \ ........ . .... � '. / '••· ....._� \ ,. , , I / 1Ps! A� 's, .. .-/ '•,.'t �� '� I \ ",. I �\ I MAINTAIN 1 O' OF SEPARATION / � I ;, ½ If, ,.:::::3--=-------= BETWEEN SEWER AND WATER : '} I -----�""-...-....__,..W20' UTILITY \\ \\1 (\I � I � �--__a--� _ �ENT , ;' _ -:::::::-:: ....... � EW MANHOLE' - ....._ -. ._ �\ ✓ ½ ,.... .......... , ... ,,.,,,,., ... ,.,a,... "" '-REMOVE ·-.., \ ' {J � � .............. 0"\ '-�H..'.'._ � E \ � � �, I 1/ "':,,,/ , ... .,.:>""�'_!....::; �, ."' ', ' �,"---'---:,-� 1 $ ,./ LOT 3 -..... .............._ ...... , ..... � _j , :,, I LOT 9 0.379 AC I I I '- "-.._�, . � _ _ �.f / 1·036 AC CONNECT SERVICE LINES% ....... •�� ...... ._ �______:::-.r-_,.-••••' FROM CONDO'S INTO -. -.......S� �-1 :---.: ........... � 6"' FIRE LINE UNLESS SPECIFIED NEW MANHOLE BY EPSD LOT 10 -�·� ;f I I �Al,.h 8 .!' O• � OTHERWISE BY MECHANICAL AND A 1• •� � SERVICE LINE FOR POTABLE WATER. ......_ DISCONNECT EXISTING SERVICE, VERIFY ......_ ....._ :--,.... SIZE AND USE IF ADEQUATE. -'3'C---OHU --- LOT 11 o.583 re EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES TO BE UPGRADED PS NECESSARY, PER ELECTRICIAN ......._� 'f--REw-1tANNOL£. -� ;BEMOI/E MANHOLE ---·---•;:-::,,--4-��-s --- GAS I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I FDCLOT \6(1YP)0.254 AC =ED ED IDE RE /REST;.URANT 5,7 SF MFF -759 LOT 8 0.472 AC - ��,.--OHu -"J(J..,,....� . ....,,� . ...,T,..,.,,....�.,....�,""'T,=�.=..:""'�.-=�.=�.-e,,:,h,�.-=�.=�.=.:""'�.:""'�.-=�.=�.=,,:""'�.-=�.=�.=,.:""'�.-=� . ...,T,..,., .... �.,-..-.... -,-..--,-..-...,-.... J " I I '' OVERHEAD STREET LIGHT (1YP) / -,_ ,,_ ,· "., ... ' I , ' I ' ' ', I � 0 \ I \ 6� FIRE LINE UNL.£SS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE BY MECHANICAL A.ND A. 1 • SERVICE LINE FOR POTABLE WATER RUN FIVE 1 � COP. WATER SERVICES TO (5) ALPINE BUILDINGS SCALE: 1• = 50' 50 100 150 --- 0 0 : ........ • ... . il ...... UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES ELECTRIC: 1.THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED />S A LAND SURVEY PLAT NOR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. 2.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILl1Y OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH THE UTILl1Y COMPANIES THE LOCATION OF THE UTILl1Y LINES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO RELOCATE THE LINES, IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE SEPARATE UTILITY ENTITIES. 3.UTILITIES ARE SCHEMATIC, THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHOULD BE LOCATED USING THE UTILl1Y NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO AT 1-800-922-1987 OR 811 PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR LOCATION. 4, ALL SERVICE LINES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ARE TO BE 3" SCHEDULE 4D PVC. ALL SERVICE LINES SHALL BE BURIED 2 FEET DEEP, WITH CAUTION TAPE PLACED AT A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT FROM TRANSFORMER TO PEDESTAL. TELEPHON CONDUIT (2") AND CABLE CONDUIT {2"0 SHALL BE BURIED WITH THE ELECTRIC CONDUIT. 5.METER SOCKETS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED WITH THE RESIDENCE ADDRESS AND UNIT NUMBERS ALONG WITH THE STATE ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO HOOK UP BY THE ESTES LIGHT AND POWER DEPARTMENT. 6.FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICES, IT WILL BE THE ELECTRICIAN'S RESPONSIBILl1Y TO DIG THEM INTO THE TRANSFORMERS OR PEDESTALS. 7.THE ELECTRICIAN WILL NEED TO SCHEDULE WITH EPL&P TO UNLOCK AND OPEN TRANSFORMERS OR PEDESTALS. 8.ALL INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONNECTION FEES ARE TO BE PAID FOR IN ADVANCE OR ADDED TO THE PERMITS. 9.ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT ELECTRIC SERVICES WILL BE CONNECTED BY EPL&P WITHIN 5 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE STATE ELECTRICAL INSPECTION AND FEES ARE PAID. SEWER: 1. ALL SEWER SERVICES ARE TO BE 4" SDR 35 PVC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, BURIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF THREE FEET. THE MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN WATERLINE AND SANITARY SEWER LINE IS 10 HORIZONTAL FEET. 2.SEE ESTES PARK SANITATION DISTRICT SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION OF MANHOLES AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LATERAL LINES. 3.MANHOLES THAT HAVE TO BE RAISED OR LOWERED MUST HAVE A MIN. 6" AND MAX. 18" TO FIRST STEP. 4.MAXIMUM INSIDE DROP IN SANITARY SEWER IS 0.50 FEET INSIDE MANHOLES. 5.ANY SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS LOCATED IN A ROADWAY OR DRIVEWAY WILL BE BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH A CAST IRON CLEANOUT COVER. 6.MAINTAIN 1 O' HORIZONTAL MINIMUM BETWEEN WATERLINE, STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER LINE. 7.ALL WATERLINE AND SEWERLINE CROSSINGS SHALL HAVE SLEEVING OF EITHER UTILl1Y FOR TEN FEET WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC IN A HORIZONTAL DIRECTION UNLESS THE UTILITIES ARE SEPARATED BY 12" OR MORE VERTICALLY. 8, GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE SIZED AT BUILDING PERMIT PHASE FOR EACH BUILDING, RESPECTIVELY. 9. A SAMPLING BASIN (INDIVIDUAL MANHOLE IN THE SERVICE LINE) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY DISTILLERY, TO BE DESIGNED AT BUILDING PERMIT PH/>SE. WATER: 1.THE NEW WATER MAIN LINE SHALL BE WET TAPPED INTO THE EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN TO THE EAST AND HARD LINED INTO THE EXISTING 6" ON THE PROPER1Y. 2.FIRE LINES WILL BE DESIGNED AND SIZED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. 2./>S-BUILTS FOR WATERLINE ARE REQUIRED AND ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. 3.ALL WATER LINES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND BURIED ACCORDING TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER DESIGN AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. THE TOWN WATER DEPARTMENT WILL NEED TO INSPECT ALL LINES PRIOR TO COVERING . � 1.GAS LINES SHOWN ARE THOSE FOUND IN THE FIELD AND MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. USE CAUTION WHEN DIGGING ANYWHERE AND CALL ONECALL FOR LOCATES. >-rn z 0 If) c;j 0::: � 0 � I Ul " .., 0 "It ;'.,"'.., " 0 N 0 N DRAWN BY: C) z ->-r-.LI.I->8-a::: (X) � ::)0 '? Cl) 0"' <( (X) a::"' cg __ zoo�c-:; a:: .. C)<Cx (L ;::i: z (/). -w a::: >--(X) LI.I Cl) (X) w.,,LI.I. 0) z .J, -□ro C) a::"'z,,,--Ll.lwow" a:: 0) u --z ,.a::: i:li !,! Oc;:� ::c � (L 0 -z JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 4 OF 8 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 Page 83 ELKHORN AVE RIGHT-OF-WAY REDIRECT EXISTING ELKHORN LODGE SIGN TO BE RELOCATED ·'.· ....•.·..•. ,. NEW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN W11-2 &: W16-7P ..... ---RELDC.A:TE� POLE 3' -.... , \·· ,­SOUTHERLY OF ',, ,,,.,. SIDEWALK ';_:_ LEFT TURN LANE DDIENSIONS ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. NEW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AHEAD SIGN W11-2 &: W16-9P / EX. SPEED LIMIT 35 SIGN 160' TAPER NEW WET TAP FOR 12· WATERLINE LOOP CONNECTION NEW PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AHE:40 SIGN W11-2 &: W16-9P ALL ROAD SHOULDERS SHOULD BE DRILL SEEDED OR HYDROMULCHED W/ EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ON 2:1 SLOPES OR GREATER WITH ENGINEER APROVED SEED MIX. BACKFILL MUST BE COMPACTED TO 90% TYPICAL DRIVE CROSS SECTION ROAD SLOPE <5% 5%-8% >8% NO SCALE CROWN SLOPE 2% 3% 4% 5' WIDE SIDEWALK PER PLAN, 6" CONCRETE SCALE: 0 50 ' -� _l, 1 o--J-------',-5 '-o'�· --r--3 '-o" ALL ROAD SHOULDERS SHOULD BE DRILL SEEDED OR HYDROMULCHED W/ EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ON 2:1 SLOPES OR GREATER WITH ENGINEER APROVED SEED MIX. BACKFILL MUST BE COMPACTED TO 90% --2-4% 1� 2-4%---- 3" COMPACTED TYPE SX HOT MIX ASPHALT IN PLACE 4" COMPACTED AGGREGATE ROAD BASE WITH COMPACTION WILL BE TO 95% OR BET1ER OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT ±2% COMPACTED SUB BASE MATERIAL TO 95% OR BET1ER OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT ±2%, FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER PLAN (TYPE 2 -1½' PAN, ½' CURB) FINES, NOTE: SUBGRADE AND ROAD BASE TO BE TESTED WITH A PROOF ROLL TO BE WITNESSED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WHEN IN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTE: CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK WHERE APPLICABLE. CROWN OR SLOPED IN ONE DIRECTION WHERE APPLICABLE. TYPICAL ELKHORN AVE. CROSS SECTION NO SCALE ROAD SLOPE <5% 5%-8% >8% CROWN SLOPE 2% 3% 4% 1· 50' 100 150 ' PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED 2' -0" 1 2· -o" 1 2· -o" 10'-o" +---------=-------+-�-+-------PRO POSED ------+------TUR N LANE TO UTI LIZE ------,-------MULTI-USE SOUTHERN LANE EXISTING LANE TRAIL 12'-o" TO UTILIZE EXISTING LANE / EXISTING ,_ 12 -- ---2-4% ----------2 -4 % 2-4%---�1 =I �m=m=m=m=TTT=�=ffi�I l�ffl=lff=rrJ;; I 1=lff-fff-ffi--1 I ;-�-ffi-m-1; 1-�-ffi-ffi;; I 1=lff=lff=lff=1 I l;ffl=lff=ITT=I I l=ffi=ITT� 1 T 1-11 111-111-,,,_,,,_,,,_,,,_ ,, . ... ' ,, '''-''""""-'-111-111-111 -111::::::::111=111=111 1 □• WIDE, 6" THICK, CONCRETE MULTI-USE TRAIL PER ESTES PARK SPECIFICATIONS 4" MIN COMPACTED TYPE SX HOT MIX ASPHALT IN PLACE. MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE ROAD BASE WITH FINES, COMPACTION WILL BE TO 95% OR BET1ER OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT ±2% COMPACTED SUB BASE MATERIAL TO 95% OR BET1ER OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT ±2%, FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER PLAN (TYPE 2 -2' PAN, ½' CURB) 80':I:. PUBLIC NEW HANDICAP RAMP NEW PEDESlRIAN CROSSING SIGN ---=� W11-2 &: W16-7P 01-1\J ---QHIJ ELKHORN AVE RIGHT-OF-WAY � -.....c::::::::�-c-=�·�·�Q·�==�-��----==� ==���-,=�·-·r··"--..::::::--_.,...--Oti>-___ .. OHIL ==='""'-·· ,.--""-"··�--.,..--;/---..__, .. NOTE: SUBGRADE AND ROAD BASE TO BE TESTED WITH A PROOF ROUL TO BE WITNESSED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WHEN IN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NEW PEDESTRIAN / CROSSING AHEAD SIGN W11-2 &: W16-9P EXISTING HANDICAP RAMP ;,. ·: ··� ... :;-;>·: :-·/-':-· -.EX 8' SIDEWALK AND 2' C&G Iii -=' ........ \_ EX. SPEE;D LIMIT 20 SIGN_ EXISTING PAVER ENTRY SAVE AND PROTECT -, Ra.oCATE UTILIIY POLE 3, ..... SOIJTHERLY Of" SIDEWALi< EX. t.tll.E w.Rl<ER ·, M SHOULDER >-rn z 0 Vl c;j DC � 0 I Ul '-' .., 0 '-' It ;'., "' .., '-' 0 N 0 N DRAWN BY: C) z JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 5 OF 8 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 Page 84 ,,_-------------- ', ' "---... \_,-, \_ ' I 'l '/ --J/i ', ', ' ' ....... , NEW cu"t.'tl{;.RT ', SIZE TO� 'DE:[ERWINED', ........ .... ....------�--� .... ,---........... .... ... ........ .... ....--------- I I I I I I I I I '\ \ \ \ \ ---OHU \ I \ \ I \ \ I I I \ I \ \ ,\ \' \ ,,.,,..' -­' -,_ --- --�'� ao1 ....... --../ie.j .• -- � --' r,.; I ' ' '. I "'I ♦ ' } '·· . -��-S--;-_s� /\ !' s I' ,' TW 00.0 j 18" ADS / �NV 0UT=7599.0 / I �"\ i ' ., ./ ' , <l { 't•� \ •....... _...,:..J \ \ TBC=7605.95 --,, • -------- 5' "'N°PE~ir-------\ INV OUT=7602.95 ',,'/.(_ 1, 1, /��-, ...... , ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. ,,,.,.----• !:�-----,/ =s---� OHIJ-- • :::.,�-- ' \ \ \.. \ \ ----··-:. \ --·· : ' ...... .... . ' ' �}� \ ....... - o TEIO� ', 90.9:S m)C TBOC 1W BW B?.BO 5' TYPE R TBC-7587,80 INV OUT=7!5B4.80 -TOP BACK OF CURB-TOP OF WAl..l.-BOTTOM OF WALL SCALE: 1" 50' 50 100 150 LEGEND rzf & llIBl [l:QJ � ¾ II] ® (I! tr © §I 'i' � ____ , ___ _ ----•-------,------- ---CHU ---ETC ---- UTILITY POLE EXISTING NEW ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER NEW PRIMARY JUNCTION CABINET NEW/EX. FIBER OPTIC JUNCTION BOX NEW ELECTRIC PEDESTAL NEW UGI-IT POLE PULL BOX NEW UGI-IT POLE CABLE PEDESTAL TEl..£PHONE PEDESTAL NEW FIRE DEPARTlrdENT CONl£CTION WATER SHUT OFF VALVE NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW/EX SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NEW SANITARY GREASE INTERCEPTOR NEW STORM SEWER MANHOLE NEW STORM SEWER TYPE-R DELINEI\TOR STREET SIGN (OR A. FIRE LANE SIGN) SEWER LINE -NEW/EX TO REW.IN WATER LINE-NEW/EX TO REMAIN GAS LINE -NEW/EX TO REMAIN STORM SEWER -NEW OVERtEAD UTILJTY LINES (TELE, CABLE AND/OR ELECTRIC) NEW BURIED ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE It CAEILE MAIN NEW BURIED ELECTRIC SER\IICE TO INCLUDE CABLE AND TELEPHONE FENCE-EXISTING FENCE-NEW EXISTING 1 O' CONTOUR INTERVAL EXISTING 2' CONTOUR INTERVAL FINISH GRADE 2' CONTOUR RO/ID OR ORNE PROPERTY LINE NEW INTERNAL. PROPERTY LINES NEIGHBOR PROPERTY LINE CONCRETE PAVING AND lRASH DUMPSTER PAO W/ FENCED ENCLOSURE .. '.-:.) ,· : r: DRAWN w <L BY: C) z JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 6 OF 8 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 Page 85 \ ,,_--------/ ', ' "---... I ' I , \_ ' I .... , 'I --J/i lIIIIIIII ' ' \' \ \ I \ \ \ I \ \I \ \ II I I I I \ \ \ I \ \' \ .,,..,,..,,.,' .. , ' ' ,_ i)'".---"'' -· --. -, --""" "··---------.,., �OlfJ -'"' ' ----------------------..., --------------------- i .. ,., ... ,., ... , . . , . ,, .... .. .. .... .. : .... .. .. .... .. :,:.-:·::::.-: .. ,.,, ....... . ..... . : .............. : .................................................................... .. .. .-:.-,:::>::::-::::·:::::-::::.::::-:::::-::::.::::-:::::-::::.::::-:::::-::::.::::-:::::-::::.::::-:::::-::::.::::•., :-::::.::::. .-.-.-: .............. :.-.-.-.......................................................................................................................... .. ................................................................. , .....,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,.,,., .. ,., .. , . .. . _.: . /:(-:;: . ::,:,::-:;: . ::,:,::-:;: . ::,:,::-:;: . ::,:,::-:;: .::,:,::-:;:.::,:,::-:;:.::,:,::-:;:.::,:,::-:;:.::,:,::-:.-,: . .-:::. ,1, I, I I I ' ------� --__ ..,I ------------,, ,, --, 00 ,-..' -­' \ \ -------------... ............... ', -----...', \ ' \ \ . -,-. -, -, --,-,.·-.... �..-­.,,,,. ,,,.., ,,, -·-, I / ( . r· "'T• -, -. ""7'I -. -, ,, , I I I ' ,, / I ,, __ ., ,,,.., 1 ) ,,,."' ---:·•-:.:.-z. ! ..... ... ........ ...... · ......... .. , . , .. ..... -·�···-'"•'-.::,,------\ --�... \ ' '\ ·,,!,I ( \I : I I __ I j' \ ' ' \ LOT 1 3.291 AC ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ oPEN sPACE ARa-1N ... .., CALCULATION ',..., I III I ' ' I 'I I '· \ s ,, �-�-•----\p I\ I ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. ................................., ' I l I '· I '-,,, ' =.,..- ...-----... , ' , ' , ' ,,, ',, . --...-, ....... -, --"\-"\ ��\, ....... ,,,-_ -... ('!ti -"I I \ \ "' -, \ \ .... ...\ -, ,, --'--, '1 I ', I I I I I ) \ I � .,, ____, ____ _ ------. SCALE: 1" 50' 0 50 100 --- --------- "--------- ·--- 150 •-i_�--- 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED AS NATURAL-APPEARING LAND FORMS, WITH CURVES THAT BLEND INWITH ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SLOPES. ABRUPT ANGULAR TRANSITIONS AND LINEAR SLOPES SHALL BE AVOIDED. 2. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITHIN ONE GROWING SEASON AFTER CONSTRUCTION,USING A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVE OR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. THE DENSITY OF THE REESTABLISHED GRASS VEGETATION AFTER ONE GROWING SEASON SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND INVASION OF WEEDS. 3.ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE EXISTING VEGETATIVE COVER IS DAMAGED OR REMOVED, THAT ARE NOT OTHERWISECOVERED WITH NEW IMPROVEMENTS, SHALL BE SUCCESSFULLY REVEGETATED WITH A SUBSTANTIAL MIXED STAND OF NATIVEOR ADAPTED GRASSES AND GROUND COVERS. 4. ON MAN MADE SLOPES OF 25% OR GREATER, PLANT MATERIALS WITH DEEP ROOTING CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION ANO REDUCE SURFACE RUNOFF. ALL MAN MADE SLOPES GREATER THAN 50% TOBE UULCHED AND NITTED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION AND REVEGETATION. 5. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STOCKPILED ANDCONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING REVEGETATION OR LANDSCAPING, SUCH AS CUT AND FILL SLOPES. 6.NO TREES OR VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED OUTSIDE THE APPROVED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.7. CONIFER TREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 50% EIGHT FEET TALL AND 50% AT SIX FEET TALL AT PLANTING. DECIDUOUSTREES SHALL BE SIZED AS 50% AT FOUR INCH CALIPER AND 50% AT TWO INCH CALIPER PLANTING. SHRUBS SHALL BE 5 GALLON CONTAINER OR LARGER AT PLANTING. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPECIFICATION FOR NUMBER 1 GRADE,AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY STANDARDS OF THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, TITLE 35, ARTICLE 26, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. 9.ALL LANDSCAPES SHALL INCLUDE A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING AUTOMATED SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH INDIVIDUAL DRIPLINES FOR NON TURF AREAS. 10. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE PROPERTYOWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRIGATING, PRUNING, WEEDING, MOWING, FERTILIZING, REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS IN POOR CONDITION AND OTHER MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANTINGS � NEEDED. 11. ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED DR GUYED AND FENCED TO PROTECT FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. NO CHAIN LINK FENCINGSHALL BE ALLOWED TO PROTECT LANDSCAPING FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. 12.DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE BY WILDLIFE.13.THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY. IT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A LAND SURVEY PLAT NOR ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT • PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: DISTRICT BUFFER: 8 EVERGREEN TREES AND 11 SHRUBS PER 100 LINEAR FEET 135 FEET BETWEEN THE RM ZONED CONDOS AT THE NORTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT LOT AND THE SUBJECT LOTREQUIRES 8 EVERGREEN TREES AND 13 SHRUBS .. 135 FEEi' ALONG THE NORIHE'AST DISTRICI' ZONE IS UGlffl.Y BUFFERED AND l.£SS DE'IEI..OPED. THERE EXISTS A PFINN::r FENCE ALONG THIS LINE WITH A SMALL NUMBER OF TREES/SHRU8S ON THE SUBJECT L.al' SIDE OF THIS FENCE. DUE TO THE �NED PUCEMENT OF REQUIRED SIDEWALJ<S AND 1l£ DE\'ELOPMENT OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. UTILITIES AND SURROUNDING AREA, AND THE PROXIWTY TO THE FH.L RNER WEIIAND AREA, AN ADDmONAL 1WO E.VERGREEN lREES AND TM! SHRUBS ARF. BEING PROVIDED IN THIS BUFFER ZONE. 1544 FEEi' ON THE WESI' SIDE OF THE SUBJECT L.al' IS WEU. BUFFERED BY NAlURAL VEGETATION AND NAlURAL TOl'OGRN'HIC FEAlURES. THE NORTH SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY IS BORDERED BY FH.L RNER AND IS MODERATELY BUFFERED WITH NAlURAL IIEGEIA110N, NO ADDRlONAL DISTRICT BUFFERING IS PIANNED FOR THIS NORlliERN SIDE. ARTERIAL STREET FRONTAGE: 1 TREE PER 25 LINEAL FEET AND 1 SHRUB PER 10 LINEAL FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE 200 FEET REQUIRES 9 TREES AND 16 SHRUBS: 200 FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF lHE SUB.ECT L.al' IS LIGHTLY BUFFERED. APPROXIMATELY 40 FEEi' OF THIS STREET FRONTAGE LIES WRHIN FH.L RNER, NO TREES ARF. PIANNED FOR THIS SECTION. 7 NEW lREES AND 14 NEW SIRUBS ARF. PROPOSED FOR THIS ARE'A TOTAL REQUIRED DISTRICT BUFFER, ARTERIAL: 7 NEW lREES AN> 14 NEW SHRUBS, NONE OF WHICH ARF. PIANNED TO BE EVERGREEN. PARKING LOT ISLAND LANDSCAPING: 1 TREE AND 2 SHRUBS PER 2,500 SQUARE FEET OF PARKING LOT. PROPOSED P-fjG L.al' CONSISlS OF 1159,755.6 SQUARE FEEi', THIS REQUIRES 64 TREES AND 128 SHRUBS. HOWE.'IER,DUE TO THE PROPOSED PARKING L.al' DESIGN, THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT OF NEW BUILDfjGS AND SIDEWAU<S, THE PUCEMENT OF NEW UTIUIY LINES, AND THE MD\/ING OF ORIGINAL BUILDtlGS TO BE KEPT, 45 NEW lREES AND 90 N SHRUBS ARE PROPOSED IN THE P-.NG L.al' ISIANDS AND IN SOME SP01S ALONG P-ING AREAS ADJIICENT TO NEW AND/OR IIO\IED BUILDINGS Mi A BUFFER, BUILDING VIEW BUFFER: 6 NEW EVERGREEN TREES ARE PLANNED AROUND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NEW/PROPOSEDEVENT CENTER AS A VIEW BUFFER FOR GUESTS AND ALSO FOR THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY, OF WHICH 20 ARE BEING REMOVED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THERE IS A SIGNIFlCANT NUMBER OF EXISTING SHRUBS ON THE PROPERTY OF WHICH ±15 ARE BEING REMOVED. THE VAST MAJORllY OF TREES AND SHRUBS ARE ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERlY THAT IS BEING PROTECTED. MOST OF THESE TREES ARE NOT BEING USED FOR COUNTING TOWARDS THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. THAT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE HEAVILY LOCATED IN ONE AREA AND WOULD NOT BUFFER OTHER AREAS f:,S A RESULT. TC11'AL PROPOSED NEW TREES: 158 TREES INCWDING 2 DISTRICT BUFFER E.VERGREEN lREES. 1153 SHRUBS :·}';:�. 7 DECIDUOUS lREES, 18 SHRUBS AND 2 EVERGREEN lREES FOR DISTRICT AND AR1ERW.. I..MIDSCAPING ··'!•.•. ',, 42 lREES AND 55 SHRU8S FOR GENERAL PMKING L.al' AND PMKfjG L.al' ISLAND LANDSCN'ING ··.,;.,., :-1_6 TREES FOR BULDING \IIEW BUFFERING. 6 OF WHICH ARF. TO BE CONIFEROUS....... ' ., .. •' ' • ',y .... TC11'AL ISLAND AREA: 3,618.28 SF+ 3,056.17 SF+ 1,672.92 SF+ 1,651.78 SF+ 1,430,44 SF+ 1,011.86 SF+ 279,03 SF+236.4 SF + 178.51 SF + 155.29 SF + 149.2 SF + 148.89 SF + 148.27 SF • 13,737.03 SF TC11'AL PARKING L.al' AREA: 211,067.8 SF+ 3,348.48 SF -51,578.5 SF -2,582.19 SF• 159,205.6 SF LANDSCAPE ISLAND PERCENTAGE -13,558.52 / 159,205.6 -8.5% (6% REQUIRED) TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA: RIPARIAN AREA + HORSE PADDOCK + SOUTHERN WOODED/ROCK AREATOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA: 38,9n.44 + 122,679.9 + 170,750.9 = 332,408.3 SF TOTAL LAND AREA = 809,475.5 OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE -332,408.3 / 809,475.5 -41.1,C (30ll REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED SEED MIX·. PLANT SCHEDULE: PLANT lREES CHOKE CHERRY COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE, ASPEN PONDEROSA SHRUBS JUNIPER SHRUB PINE SHRUB POTENTILL.A RUSSIAN SAGE SQUAW CURRANT QUANTITY 9 31 28 17 20 35 45 45 18 • 0 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE * PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE PROPOSED SHRUB SIZE 6'-8' 6'-8' 61-8' 61 -8 1 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL GlA.'13!HII Ill( COMldON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVE Prairl1 Jun1C1rase Koel1rio mocrantha r Blue Grama Boutelouo ;rocm, r Arizona Fescue Fesl:uca 11rizonica r Mountain muhly Muhlenb1rgia r montana Bluebunch Psedoraegnerlo r Wheob;,roa &picoto Western Wheatgruu Pmcapyrum smithii r � PLS/li 20 25 20 10 10 15 >-rn z0 Vl c;j 0:: � 0 �IUl " .., :,; ::, 0 " It;'.,"'.., " 0 N 0N DRAWN BY: C) z ->-r--LI.I->8-a::: (X) � ::)0 '? Cl) 0"' <( (X) a::"' cg __ zoo�c:; a:: .. C)<Cx o._ ;::i: z (/). -w a::: >--(X) LI.I Cl) (X) w.,, ...... 0) z .J, -oro C) a::"'z,,,--Ll.lwo w"a:: 0) u�z ..a::: i:li !,! Oc;:� ::c � o._ 0 -z � JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' DATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 7 OF 8 PROJ. ND. 2019-02-02 Page 86 ELKHORN LODGE P. U.D. fl} ' ; ' ' .•. -,..,,, .. I -e-0 SCALE: 1" = 60' 0 60 90 BODY PATI, (TYP� WHEEL PATH (TYP>-----.,. "'- FIRETRUCK DETAIL FIRE TEMPLATE NOTES: 1.PUMPER FIRE TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE WAS USED WITH CIVIL JD VEHICLE TRACKING TO GENERATE THE VEHICLE TRACKING PATHS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. 2.ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY FIRE APPARATUS WILL REQUIRE CAREFUL DRIVING BYTHE OPERATOR OF THE VEHICLE. THE PATHS SHOWN HAS BEEN DESIGNEDSUCH THAT THE THE FIRE APPARATUS CAN PASS ALONG THE FINISHEDSURFACE OF THE ROAD AND PRIVATE DRIVES. CARE MUST BE TAKEN SHOULD ACCESS BE REQUIRED DURING ADVERSE WEATHER/DRIVING CONDITIONS. 3.FOR CLARITY IN TIGHTER LOCATIONS, SHORTER SE CTIONS OF VEHICLE PATHSARE SHOWN TO ILLUSTRATE THAT THE FIRE APPARATUS CAN MAKE THEREQUIRED MOVEMENTS IN 11,AT SPECIFIC LOCATION. 120 >­CD z 0 (/) w :i: (f) DRAWN BY:CJB CHECKED BY:LAS JWC SCALE 1 "=60 1 DATE:02 20 2020 SHEET 8 OF 8 PROJ. NO.2019-02-02 Page 87 ELKHORN LODGE SUBDIVISION EXCEPTED PARCEL FROM BOOK 839 PAGE 334 I ROW 80'± 1/ (S8B"06"2B"W 154') ORIGINAL ELKHORN PARCEL LI� ELKHORN AVE. toUND 3.25" GLO BAASS'i;AP (NE CO R. S26/ NW CCR. S2�) / '-'-� / N88"26"51"E 229.00' "in I ' �,.______NB8"26'51"E 259.80' _/ NBB'26 ,51,,E 22g,Q') EXCEPTED PARCEL FROM 'c";i'� -� ',,,, --------------___ <��B"2 �•-5 1"E-�59.��)--� ;�\, 0""" FOUND ....,.-�85.38"_ _' =,. 1�6.52"0� 36.41' BOCK 839 PAGE 335 !� :� 'l .,iso1 ;;-J ,,;. � "x" CHISELED INTO N�E ~ 2�8-32� <e'/' 5 . ", ' \ . . \ ' '\ . I' ' I ) ' • I ; OU � ,_.J' <ROCK 0.29' NORTH --,. �lfy I"' ' c:fl-,.-.1"! -,<i • .., , !7,-' OF R-0-W LINE -\ Yi.\ ,,/}>_ u, ;·,,., ROW ,<>'\/' ,<p'I, .{/ (HEUD FOR LINE) \ \�.\ ",<J,1 ,._,.,,__ l!Ji ' 0R IG /Jc8 4 "22 '34"E 114') 98.3'± ....,<> . , <> I/ /1/ \ 1<" \4' '" 1--':"��_EELK�H�O�R�N�P�si�:lcl/,_�=====r=::::::::;;,-,'>"'b"' • .p/" I £ \"' , _ I" ROW ', �, O' .,"-:;.1 /. \ if\ \ '� Se.s-J: �-·1 "'°IES ' c,'> _, , � "\ "--"-rs ••. � •• ..,_ -•= ' vii 4>.' �., ,, \ ,"· ' � "�:i" < ,.o oLD uNGEJl. .#,. " /, -¼ \ ) \ \ ' &� -;:1.0,. j I ' ----1 #::,o' /,_,; ,5'7 \ l L-18.65'� ,, ""'1-1) ,:; FOUND ,Sl�.� /4 I i R-50.00· t � : I #4 REBAR WITH OR-"-/ I / I· D•21"22'16" .,, ' '"· ILLEGIBLE PLASTIC CAP O j;0 Ill I , I 1, f cH�-s31-�3"3D'W '¾-' '� -�'I. r-#4 REBAR I I / · � ..::..-� � ,,, LOT 1 ° 0 WOH PLASTIC 1// '1 /::; I , � - - --==-....._______ '� ' .'' ' LEGEND 0 @ • " 00.00 (00.00) FOLIIID MONUMENT />S NOTED FOLIIID #4 REBAR WITH 1 • PLASTIC CAP LS #26974 SET '4 REBAR WITH 1 • PLASTIC CAP LS #26974 FOLIIID ALIQUOT OR HIGHWAY R-0-W MARKER MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS PLATTED OR DEEDED DIMENSIONS ------PROPERTY LINE ----NEW INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES -· - -• -ALIQUOT LINE ---------NEIGHBOR PROPERTY LINE ------EASEMENT (AS NOTED)-----CENTERLINE EASEMENT (/>S NOTED)-----------PUBUC SERVICE EASEMENT -B1396 P150& ACCESS EASEMENT TO ELKHORN PLAZA CONDOS #4 REBAR WITH 1 .�• ALut-AIN CAP 26974 STdMPED "p ---------------FOUND II / I / :J CH-18.54 , --=--� _ ! (M l!•t�J��;K & �� CAP 26974 / $ 'JI/! ff tj ,'t��'�:,, I / MA RIE ��tR:=CHER) �� 71/,' ;,, / 1 I ti., ,,,1,i;,If!! A�\'\\ � .,,�, S&s:ie ' ' '-�-' I' . '<f> o o 1/, "-;... I , , \ s85. ""'.Js Ii< ' ::,, FOU D . !; g !/ $1/ I �v � ' !! (Ses-, •• :rst N8r45'05"E 131.02:"'!!). / Iii I L-52.14•., \\\ J,,t I • .Je;r&• � 81�o-(N8741·12·E 137.60 ) -:J' I f R -50.00 � "'' . 9.•B · < __-?, ry I D=59'44'37" 'J �v, __:-- _ --._____#4 R BAR WOH 1 5" -=-"'---� ALUMINUM CAP 26 74 20.84' ----= � -=--7/ I LOT 1 / CHB=S09"09"56"E � II II, ·"'1 4----i----'-- -"" --, I --= - -=7" /4 3.291 AC / CH-49.81' ----II I !'c �"'" L '· ST�M 'WC 1 '" I OEOICATEO TO THE TOWN ..= --/4 NEW UTILITY E:ASEMENT / --; ,o� ---------�89•.Js•---... CENTERLINE NEW \� / P' �-_..a � ' � ADDmoNAL Row TO BE /Y I _ ---; ...__-. 1 (\ <: ... -, ROW •I ' ' I. ' I ---:--/ _ .k= ___ =-=-� (THs PORTION rn• -Js•i'1/ - _ �-... ---..::..._ "':_1t -... -... 20 · wI 0E , , i-� _ �_;::p-,l I ,�•,, �=�/ ACCESs AROUND wAU) ) _ � -__ ---. �96, ...... -.... unuTY EASEMENT \ -� ,,,,,..,,� 1 , ,, �-.... o / I!------........._ -' ' fi �·// , O'd,o I I PUBLIC SERVICE I ---- > ...... \ �, .,,. .,v> ./ ... :;::::,' � �·� "\ ,9 J8 I , (XCEL) EASEMENT / \ S39"02'15'"E -------....._ ...._ '\.....� .,, I i � ....._ 010 ', �Cl� __ _ ---=:... ---==---/ ---ij=,•29�-<--'--.... ... '....._ ', ., jo :z:1 z ' � -;------=-:::::_------�===-==--=-/ --,;I-=--s•1 0' ...._ ....._ -......_.....,IVB5-,, � ,;/ 1.036 AC t-.l.� �� \, -1-. ----.:� -=.=--/ ·e. .,.. ------.... ......_ ....... ... vs�s ......_ �-..... -__....:::::.....___ _ -� ..., I · 60'± •'7t---L tr· I I -----]J :_-�-=------�--1-'=----�-=.:=,,,,,,======� � ./ ----' t: -�_?� ------:>-;:--... �;;_ ......_ ......_ ...., ...., ...., �s)l-0-;;...., �U � I ,, l!J / 10' -------=-----=--=-----=-----------:.-�--=-==-=----\ \ ---;-:..:::---::-..:::.:._ ....... _::--�Je..,,............. ..._ ..._ --.......;_·�B· ......, ......_ I � �� ,\ ,, ----� -;;:,---___ ) -? .,.------....._ ......_ -....._ ........ (: ,-....... ......_ ........._ .....__ CII ' ' I",'" 80.. o " "--., .,00 zz I --------------.... , ..... �........ , ...... , --...... , 01 � I \� · �I CENTE R LINE NEW ------=-------/ --,. -------',, '-',,' �S9 °'-'- ' '-• � ' I 20 , WIDE -------I ---' '-' --..:::• '-'-- '-I I'> ' {:',;I 77--___ _,_ .),---', '-',.:---.. '-'--, --;--t,:, EUKHORN PLAZA ' ;,1 I UTILITY EASEME NT / /\ �-S27'07'13'"E 106.63' .................. -:::-::.._......... ...... ....... -------I \ ASSOCIATION \, • / / \ ', '--N81·s7•0 ,.. --, • ,,. I , \ ' -, ---1 .. IJ --i:; / , /\ \ CENTERLINE NEW � ,._ ' r -� ---!_-�.3' - -\ � CEPTED: / / I / \ \ / 20' WIDE / ·,...._ ,,,,'-,/ / ------- _ _,,,, \\ � CEL F ROM ' ' ' ·, 80'± ROW A f NEW 20· UTILITY / • / y UTILITY EASEMENT ¾, �',, '-/ -----Yr-ii'--I I OK 1469 o, / EASEMENT �f, / \ \_ -..:-,,,: ,'.:-::.;:--./ t /, S7B"54'3B"W 10.29" \ 1 AGE 785 ,-, .,,,,, / V '-,_-.... , "' o I I . , �,� / ' /N26'19'25"E 24.90' ')':_'' ,.::,.._ ',, / i:;1::/ 35-99' I FOUND #4 REBAR WOH :S:' � ·, I / / •'<-'-'¾ '-.,__, / &>I;: / PLASTIC CAP 15760 � --', I / '>'� S60"25'1 2"E 122 50' .., .... 01 .r_-� -�-� • . ..... � ', " I I ---1--. �' -""'--=--� ---==i.=:=====�1 /J.'' / , ,, \r, , , ·-� ,---=--- , I / 4Y // '-� ',l'<.--., '� / / (S>s·ss•3;��--�JN,.,ss·J:rw � � -! A;;_ >, I / , / ' l � • ,I I 120.00, I 220 ===-"'-=== =-=--- ' ' / 1 / I �ii./\ ( . ( · (s, ·49 'J / / / s3755•12"E 49.71' I' \ ,-----1,g , I( / 5·5s•32i�-�--� :, // I / / '\I \.--�5'59'01"E-130.!W--i/ii/i ( ( : D0.4 9'J "----1 •, , / " ; \ ' --- --- ... / ,./ I ' I I I I I .I/ ,, '�\'""';,----------�� I /1 ,-..; i '\ /. � \ , � m , EXCEPTED PARCEL :!1 I --........._ / 11 / ', CENTERLINE NEW f f \ \8 � I /ELKHORN PLAZA �·/; ,........._ / � 20' WIDE ._.a. \ S N44"39'17"E .:z .:z I I CONDOS tzj .__�. "' � /_NEW 10' UTILITY I EASEMENT '"'"' .. .....__ N7:;•0 •• 1 s59•02•24•E A I , , .., �..,._ ttJ ' EXCEPTED PARCEL m x ---.. .:; Biv I-� ' 10·,-I..... �, I I I � I ELKHORN PLAZA 'ui' 8 �'2' "'d -..:· 2? I*,' I '--/1_0'7 ',,,_ •1.s�-,,' (FOUND #4 REBAR ,S;:: CONDOS "! ,-:,i�oo,-..� S,t,• ) � / ' o -, I "/ o No,<"� ::tj ::tj ............. � ,,.s.s,2,-f 0?1 ..................... / I /5, , '!. ��c NZ� ,,......_ '-'...-,,.-;7 24·76" �.. / //!J / PUBLIC SERVICE ',-,,, 1 (t,,"'8"'21• : i � 8 ,,�� ► 0 I I I ,,_ 20'/ I /.?e / / / (XCEL ) EASEM ENT _J ', ,,,. __ , 8 9"<1:r!2-.,, "a / "' ol';�g i:::, 2 ........_._ I ' ..?,J.; .w f BOOK 1396 PAGE 150 .... ~-....., )r,,;,: ·8$•, Orr,r-:;;o t::::;:I 0 ELKHORN LODGE '.._..,.,. , '--"�.s-.,, /_g' \ I',--,_, ',,!�S) / N69"2_1'32'W) � �:il-3�'-:I ' ' �.. / "I /--'<, ,. ', ',, 19.8B ) ;., .. 0 - PROPERTY ' '-..._ ', ', I� I ------\ �-'£ i'',t-,, '',,,,, ,,-,, s6 - " §E�I 18.583 ACRES if,, ',,���"�f , .... , _!?!�·_:93,.;6!·�� 7-t---_______ J ir �;;.-�.::s::.-;;���::::',�,�:e!�t;��"o,-! ,�u��BAR WITHi'i'.,,, ', �;, .. . ------I I I -------ii8xoo'is"E \52•m42 ,';;;_,:,_Bis� 'ss'',,,,,_ �-A �ILLEGIBLE JS� LOT 4 .... , ' ... �Bs'> ', ws+·os'5!��--I __ -1 I t---------r I ....... �:!��J�����·�-..... FOU!llo---.... _ --""1 --��c CA� !::!:: 2.005 AC .")it/ '- � ', �7----SOO'OO'�o·E 20.46' --.---z4-,.o�·---1--------\ tg \ --�";!�!_:,,.. f/4 RE�R -------�., ., .$>, ', , , 20 41.95 _ --N 1g-s, 30 !'; - _ -I --11 I FOUN� ,, --....... ''l..:''- , .• --=�� -�e 7-,,.", '- '-......_ '-T ---------------- rJ) �-�Ill\ 1" PIPE (REPORTED IN LEGAL AS ._--._,�oe:'':.1'2: :S (} FOUN □-�-' -......____ 10' N90"00"00"E 185.85" -----I',; \ ' I u, \ ,,,;'--.'l.:o ',, I . ,-. , , - , - ----------------lo. LOT 6 "'1 °. \ N18"14'25"E 70.99' is'l.'> "'l.,;'--, ',, I ..,. "' , '--10 --\0 I j ,. (N1a•37•26"E 11 2') ""6-«'!>1 ' '-... I ,P.,J,i-J 20' WIDE .� . ii\ 0.413 AC FOUND ---....____ .....__ FOUND #3 REBAR I ii ( --7--CENTERLIN�NEW ----------;: o.254 AC \ �-\�,�\ LOT 7 . \-��-·-',,,,',,,,f _g_g UTILITY EASEMENT en. \ 1\8 1.5" ALUMINUM CAP----._____ I ,--,._ \ I · \P LS 6499 ST.MPEO ;;; ;;; I I I "LAMY P ROP CO R" I II �� ,· WLR-6170.5100·0· S20"46'10'W 60.99' 60'± PUBLI C ---------._ = · RIGHT OF WA.Y LOT a: �---, -. ---D=38"36'44" (S2<r33'28'W 61 ') I U _ ----:....,, _ S�9"40 11 � �5� CHB=S26'09'06"E: '.° I 4.584 AC. ___ ----_ -/---- " _ ---r--CH=65.96' ...: I _ ----_ - - . . - -g4 .48 ___ '-' ,, , L=7 _85, ft. \ 20' ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON "' / --1 · -----7\ , ' ;,-ELKHO RN PLAZA CONDOS PLATS ' CENTERLINE NEW ---•07"£. 2,94 .o _ __. -_,, _..., --� --S58"13'32"W 26.88' . � R=5S.OO'U-°J I L_____ 20' WIDE� -----N_B<r�---o=o o�5 -39::;�-,02.n I . --arr -•• L=90.75 , 1-. ) 10' WITNESS CO RNER ----------UTILITY EASEMENT ---_ __. ___ S __0 I , = ------2"!15"57"E 223.o,· r------------.--------------------------___ ____ ___ "1 0-9R4-:-1;.·ff: , � v____ -----,-.---_______ 10 ____ S89"1�'25.E �8.93' _ __.---------12-f.'21• � CHB=N02"48.,7.E \ .,,.J,.,\ \1 --------------10· -----------------______ --,--1 LOT 12 f3 CH=8�.8o· \ -� I _-,, / I -----------r-----------------r_-:,=.::.-;:_---1---7/[.2r I II 0.351 AC el: "'"" I,,\ I "'ii INI sa9•59•5e"W 69.53' I Ul (01 gij ; ·o lb w I "?I I I "' "' LOT 8 00 ,,_ Jr,,,! ...-. o0 1 I lo el ..... 0.472 AC z1 z I •-· '?o i-11-=.t I 1-..J -.� f',,lN / /l�,:::. "=/"l w...,I I LOT 10 1� I<» "'I"' ✓' , �,."'f} ;:: ;:: ·1 LOT 9 ', el I .. _ L=44.06' . / / "/;' t;;' c,· "'/"' ),• 0.379 AC I 0.276 AC LOT 11 L=4B.80' 0=4R5".'4575.-4122: J, ,. .,-"';;, /'•'-" !;j: I I 0.583 AC I:;'. R=463.73' / _ �.; / ,"' /!h,,-8 18 ., I 1- 0=6"01'48" I CHB=N72"58"34"E I�· /. ii;., r:; j,..lj,.. i, l'l 1 �-CHB=N87"08'29"W I CH-42.89' / b ,/ • "'� --I·· "'o ,-. ,/ --,.y /� �..,¼ n,,.,, I ls"u·· ,-o· 0 CH=48.78 I .�":l/1 / �! ./$ g,g I -.. I---!. ./i ,:p;,�/ . / � &I 1'j 1� : -------1---✓ )/ /; UNPLATTED I I � � ..., 30' PlllmfJ�WIBE AND .- ...--I / . � PROPERTY / I I "'o PUBLIC AOllE85' DIBEM .,-=---:.:t:/ I_ I I -1·�01 52" -98 35' (CHARLES D. CHAMBERLAIN, Ill, I I ..... I ui I:"' UTILITY EASEMENT � • • ~--_ -\ LAURA CHAMBERLAIN WR IGHT. SCALE: 1" = 50' CII 10 0 .. ----------...., I � b •I..... / -AND MARY MA.RECEK) � ACCESS Ji,.., L=65.00 • L=S0.07 / ,,. ..-----NB9"4G'Ol"W-199.sa'-ZONED RE-1 / I • EASEMENT •R=130.93"R=45.00"FOUND / : O 50 1 OO 150 I FO R LOT 10 0=28"26"36" I D•63"45"02" / I "'�:;9 ALs\':��� �:LS I --•---I LOT 13 P ROP CCR" WITH A 1· I S89'46'07"E 944.21' L=30.ss: gl I CH=64.33' CH=47.5J / � � 0.348 AC PIPE N19"05'46"E 0.77' FOUND ' (S89"43'34"E 944.90') I R=65.QO O l -- ----- /N.�L=124.22' SQ1"Q4'26nE 50,58' 2" ALUMINUM CAP / ,' (N89"46'28'W 80.00')1 (\ D=2T17"06"1---t:-I , / I rf R=134.70" (N01"07'34'W 52') LS 6499 CHB•N85"57"27"E I _ ___ /1 D=52"50'1 o· (N1/16 C-C CCR.) S89"41"23"E 79.98" CH=30.66" I L::: ---- -/ CHB-S63"25'32'W � A 169.67, (S89'46'2B'"E 80.00') , / , CH=119.86' 0-·-' ·. r · -E9--'--------'=;;:..--------◄-----------------...;3�2a,;1,;;·3�4;_" -------l�z��;J.�v===J·:s--·�---�---=·�--�--�--�-=-�---�--�.I�-��61.49 --------119.85 183.59" FOUND ""-. V S00'13'32"W 10.13' 2" ALUMINUM CAP PLS 6499 -.....___ (S00"13"32'W 10.00') N89'48'18'W 373.27' (N89'46"28"W 373.31') / STAAIPED "n, LAMY P ROP CORN"N89"46'07"W 2622.43' (S89"43'24 "E 2624.33' GLD) NO<r04'28'W 10.24' __./(N 1/16 COR. S26/S25) (N00"13'32"E 10.00") CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, BEING THE OWNER(S) OF THAT PART OF SECTION 25 AND 26, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUN1Y, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED I'S FOLLOWS, TO WIT: THE PORTIONS OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 26 AND THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW S; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 26, FROM WHICH POINT THE NE CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26 BEARS N 1 DEGREES 11' W A DISTANCE OF 373 FEET, AND WHICH IS THE CENTER OF THE FALL RIVER ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ELKHORN PROPERTY FOUND IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 696 AT PA.GE 463, LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY A.LONG THE CENTERLINE OF FALL RIVER ROAD JS FOLl.OWS: N 84 DEGREES 30' W, A DISTANCE OF 321 FEET; THENCE S B6 DEGREES 03' W A DISTANCE OF 154 FEET; THENCE S 68 DEGREES 04' W, A DISTANCE OF 311 FEET; THENCE N B4 DEGREES 26' W A DISTANCE OF 114 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID ROAD, S 3 DEGREES 15' W A DISTNCE OF 877 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 47' E A □ISTNACE DF 944.9 FEIT TO THE SE CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4: THENCE N 1 DEGREES 11' WA OISTA.NCE OF 52 FEIT TO THE SW CORNER OF TliE PARCEL DEEDED FROM EDWARD J. WALSH AND OE H. SIMMONS TO JAMES AND ELEANOR HONDIUS RECORDED IN BOOK 501 AT PAGE 72, LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE N 27 DEGREES 02' E A DISTANCE OF 235.5 FEET; THENCE N 1 B DEGREES 34' E A DISTA.NCE OF 71.2 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE DF PARCEL DEEDED FROM ELIZA E. WHITEHEAD TO MRS. ELLA JAMES RECORDED IN BOOK 77, AT PAGE 143, LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING MARKED WITH A 1 INCH STEEL PIPE SET BY ORIGINAL SURVEY; THENCE N 68 DEGREES 34' E A DISTANCE OF 82.3 FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF PARCEL DEEDED FROM FLORA AND J.R. STANLEY TO EDNA JAMES ANO A.N. UCKEIRMAN RECORDED IN BOOK 639 AT PAGE 314; THENCE S 75 DEGREES 26' E A DISTANCE OF 273.3 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 34 FROM WHICH POINT THE NE CORNER OF SECTION 26 BEARS N 25 DEGREES 32' W A. DISTANCE OF 1153.7 FEET; THENCE N 2 DEGREES 14' E A DISTANC E OF 207 FEET TO THE CENTER OF FALl. RIVER; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTER OF FALL RIVER A.LONG THE FLORA AND J.R. STANLEY PARCEL DEEDED TO EDNA JAMES A.ND A.N. MCKEIRMAN AND THE PARCEL DEEDED FROM FRANK W. GORE TO WILLIAN E JAMES RECORDED IN BOOK 110 AT PAGE 302, LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25; THENCE N 1 DEGREES 11 ' WA DISTANCE OF 65 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF CONTAINED IN THE AMENDED PLAT OF ELKHORN CLUB ESTATES, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF; EXCEPT THAT PARCEL CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1936 IN BOOK 639 A.T PA.GE 314; EXCEPT THAT PARCEL CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 26, 1971 IN BOOK 1469 AT PA.GE 785 EXCEPT RECORDED PLATS OF ELKHORN PLAZA LODGES CONDOMINIUMS, BUILDINGS A ANO 8. EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1987 AT RECEPTION NO. 87007530 EXCEPT THOSE PARCELS DESCRIBED IN DEEDS RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1947 IN BOOK 839 AT PA.GE 334, 335 ANO 338 CONTAINING 18.58 ACRES MORE OR LESS: HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS TO BE KNOWN I'S THE ELKHORN LODGE SUBDIVISION AND 00 HEREBY DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO ANO FOR PUBLIC USE FOREVER HEREAITTR THE STREETS I'S ARE LAID OUT ON THIS PLAT, AND DO ALSO RESERVE FOR PUBLIC USE FOREVER HEREAFTER THE PERPETUAL EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE FEATURES AS ARE LAID OUT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT, WITNESS OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS DATE ___ DAY OF _____ 2019. JUSTIN MABEY MANAGER, EAST AVENUE DEVELOPMENT, LLC STATE OF COLORADO) )SS COUN1Y OF LARIMER) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT Wl'S ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _________ 2020 BY JUSTIN MABEY. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ________ _ NOTARY PUBLIC BOARD OF TR USTEES' CERTIFICATE: DAY OF APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO BY A RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON THIS ___ OAY OF _____ 20 __ . TOWN CLERK MAYOR TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE: APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF ESTES PARK THIS ___ OAY OF ____ _ TOWN ENGINEER SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I, LONNIE A SHELDON, A DULY REGISTERED LANO SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ELKHORN LODGE SUBDIVISION. LOCATED IN SECTION 25 AND 26, T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNlY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO, TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MAOE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. P.E. AND P.L.S. #26974 NOTICE OF APPROVAL: 20 __ . A.PPROVAL OF THIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6B OF TITLE 24, C.R.S AS AMENDED. SURVEYOR NOTES: 1.LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY TITLE COMMITMENT NO. FCC25162932 -2 WAS USED FOR OWNERSHIP ANDEASEMENT RESEARCH2.AGCESS AND PARKING ACROSS LOTS 1-8 IN THE PUD SHALL BE SHARED BETWEEN UDTS 1 -8. THERE WILLBE A BLANKET EASEMENT ACROSS THESE LOTS FOR THE ACCESS ANO PARKING. 3.LOTS 8-13 HAVE A BLANKET EASEMENT FOR OVERHEAD PRIVATE ELECTRIC LINES TO SERVICE THEBUIUDINGS. ONLY THE BUIUDINGS ON LOTS 8-13 CAN HAVE O\IERHEAD LINES. 4.BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF S ECTION 26. ToN. R73W OF THE 6TH. P.M. AS MONUMENTED ON THE NORTH BY A 3.25a G.L.O. BRASS CMJ AND ON THE SOUTH BY A 2" A.LUMINUM CA.P 6499; SAID LINE HAVING A BEARING OF S01"07'32"E AS MEASURED BY GPS OBSERVATION USING THE COLOAADO STATE PLANE NO RTH ZONE (AT G ROUND). 5.THERE IS NO OBVIOUS EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE TITLE WORK FOR THE SEWER MAIN RUNNING THROUGHTHE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ADDITIONAL RESEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR COULD NOT LOCATE AN EASEMENT IN THE LARIMER COUNTY CLERK A.ND RECORDERS OFFICE. AN EASEMENT HA.S BEEN PL.ACED HEREON FOR SEWER MAIN LINES AS PROPOSED BY THE ELKHORN LODGE P.U.D. THE EXISTING LINES AT THIS TIME HAVE A. PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT WHICH SHALL BE ABANDONED UPON THE RELOCATION OF THE SEWERMAIN LINES. 6.THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS ROTATED 0"03'28" CLOCKWISE TO MATCH THEBASIS OF BEARINGS. FURTHER, ALL NEIGHBORING DEEDS AND EASEMENTS WERE ROTATED AS NEEDED TO MATCH SAID BASIS OF BEARINGS. 7, THE LINEAR UNn-FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT. 8.ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THISSURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS OF THE DATE YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE cm.tMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE CERTIFlCATION DATE SHOWN HE REON. L._ 11 ELKHORN PROPERlY ) ' VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" -1200' --IT J "I" - ' >-�rn ..,w :,; z u 0 LLLLIf) c;j �0::: ww N D N � 0 D C) z ->-r--LI.I->8-a::: (X) � ::)0 '? Cl) 0"'<( (X) 0::"' cg� zoo�c-:; 0:: .. C)<C x 0.. ;::i: z (/). -w a:::,... (X)LI.I Cl) (X)w.,,LI.I. 0) z .J, -□roC) 0::"' z,,,�L&.lwow r--0:: 0) u� z ,.a::: i:li !,! Oc;:� ::c � 0..0 -z z 0 ...... 0 rn > Q...... r:c:i Cl:: Q c:Il c., 0::=> Q ....:Irn oo ....:I t..)r:c:i z .. c., Cl:: � Q 0� 0 ....:I �� z ....:I Y)Cl:: r:c:i r:c:i0 E-i � rn r:c:i ....:I r:c:i DRAWN BY: JWC CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=50' OATE: 02 20 2020 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJ. NO. 2019-02-02 ATTACHMENT 8 Page 88 Board of Trustees Public Comment Form The Board of Trustees want to hear from members of the community. The following form was created for general public comment or public comment on any current agenda items. The Town Board of Trustees will participate in the meeting remotely due to the Declaration of Emergency signed by Town Administrator Machalek on March 19, 2020 related to COVID-19 and provided for with the adoption of Ordinance 04-20 on March 18, 2020. Click here to view the current Agenda. Please enter your full name. (This information is required to ensure the Town keeps accurate records of public comment. Name * Stance on item:* Public comment must be received by noon the day of the Town Board meeting. All comments will be compiled for Board distribution prior to the meeting. Agenda items are available the Wednesday prior to each Town Board meeting. To provide public comment on an upcoming item please use the drop down below to select the Agenda item title. Agenda Item Title * Public comment can be attached using the Upload button below or typed into the text box below. File Upload Comments for the Board of Trustees:* Please note, all information provided in this form is considered public record and will be included as permanent record for the item which it references. Paul Pewterbaugh - Fall River Village Resort For Against Neutral General Public Comment. If you do not see the Agenda Item Title please email public comment to townclerk@estes.org. Files are limited to PDF or JPG. Letter of Support - Elkhorn Development Project.pdf 629.04KB 25 MB limit. Video files cannot be saved to the final packet and must be transcribed before submitting. Limited to a maximum of 1000 characters. Please see attached my letter of support for the Elkhorn Lodge Development Project. Public Comment received 08-11-2020 Page 89 Page 90 TOWN ADMINISTRATOR’S OFFICE Report To: Honorable Mayor Koenig Board of Trustees From: Assistant Town Administrator Damweber Date: August 11, 2020 RE: Continued Discussion on Open Containers Objective: Receive direction from the Town Board on next steps, if any, related to the Town’s open container regulations. Present Situation: At its June 23rd Study Session, the Board expressed interest in exploring changes to the Town’s open container regulations in light of the restrictions imposed on businesses to slow the spread of COVID-19. A Report and Discussion item was brought to the Board at its July 14th meeting in order to share a preliminary proposal and solicit feedback and direction for staff to finalize a proposal for Board action. While the Board reviewed and discussed the information in the item, including the results of a survey of Town liquor license holders, it decided to table further consideration until all Trustees were present (July 14th was the meeting immediately following former Trustee Zornes resignation and Trustee Webermeier had not yet been appointed). Staff’s initial proposal, shared at the July 14th meeting, was to make a limited change in the Town’s open container regulations that would permit the consumption of alcoholic beverages in specific Town-owned parks between the hours of 9:00 am and 9:00 pm. In light of the information provided by Larimer County Public Health Director Tom Gonzales at the Board’s July 28th meeting – where he strongly cautioned against outdoor gatherings where people could be in close proximity for more than 10 minutes – and warnings from other levels of government about increasing local numbers of positive COVID cases, we have concerns that permitting open containers may have unintended consequences that could actually hurt, instead of help, local businesses. That being said, there may still be some advantages to expanding the locations where people can consume alcohol that are not in high-risk indoor environments. Staff is bringing forward this Report and Discussion item again to solicit specific Town Board feedback on direction prior to bringing forward a new proposal, if any, for Board action. This will allow adequate discussion of the policy issues inherent in this topic, prevent unnecessary use of staff time developing unsupported policy alternatives, and ensure that members of the public have a chance to provide input on any proposed changes to existing open container regulations. Page 91 If the Board is interested in pursuing changes to our open container regulations, staff will work to formalize the change for consideration (including the identification of appropriate Town-owned parks) at an upcoming Board meeting. A major topic of discussion at the July 14th meeting, which should be addressed again by the Board, was whether open containers in general should be permitted or only those purchased from local businesses offering take-out beverages, if the Board opts to permit open containers at all. Additionally, it should be noted that staff has held off on sending out a new survey until we can present liquor license holders with at least one specific proposal to react to. We have held off in order to avoid survey-fatigue (in addition to the Town, the Chamber of Commerce has been sending frequent surveys to busines owners in recent weeks and months). If the Town Board does not want to pursue permitting of open containers further, we do not want to bother the liquor license holders with another survey. Advantages:  Enables expanded legal consumption of alcoholic beverages within public areas which may be beneficial for businesses with limited seating/serving capacity due to COVID-19 restrictions.  Provides more opportunities for patrons of businesses that sell alcoholic beverages to be outdoors and distanced from others. Disadvantages:  Potential for higher-risk outdoor gatherings.  Public perception of increased public alcohol consumption.  Town-owned parks are used by a variety of stakeholders, some of whom may not be comfortable in an environment that includes the consumption of alcohol. Finance/Resource Impact: N/A. The Police Department is currently responsible for enforcing the existing open container provisions of municipal code and does not anticipate that a loosening of these restrictions would create a significantly higher enforcement workload. Level of Public Interest High. Attachments 1. Copy of Survey 2. Summary of Results Page 92 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 93 Page 94 Summary of Results The Town Clerk’s Office conducted a survey of Town liquor license holders (a copy of this survey is attached for your reference). The survey asked the following questions: Would allowing individuals the ability to drink alcohol outside, on public property within town limits be good or bad for your business? If open containers are allowed and alcohol can be consumed, where should it be allowed? o Anywhere in Town Limits o Downtown Only o Not Downtown If alcohol consumption is allowed downtown, where should it be allowed? o Sidewalks o Parks o Parking Lots The survey was completed by 45 of the 76 total license holders (a response rate of 59%). The results of the survey are summarized in the tables below. Outdoor consumption on public property good or bad for your business? Type of License Good Bad Neutral Total Art Gallery 2 - 1 3 Beer & Wine - - 1 1 Brew Pub 1 - - 1 Fermented Malt Beverage - 1 1 2 Hotel & Restaurant 11 3 3 17 Lodging & Entertainment 1 1 1 3 Manufacturer 4 - - 4 Optional Premise 1 - - 1 Retail 3 1 2 6 Tavern 5 1 1 7 TOTAL 28 7 10 45 If allowed and alcohol can be consumed, where should it be allowed? Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Anywhere in Town Limits 9 13 9 9 5 Downtown Only 10 10 6 13 6 Not Downtown 3 5 11 12 14 If alcohol consumption is allowed Downtown, where should it be allowed? Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Sidewalks 13 14 3 10 5 Parks 15 19 2 5 4 Parking Lots 6 6 10 14 9 Attachment 2 Page 95       Page 96