Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 2019-07-09The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to provide high-quality, reliable services for the benefit of our citizens, guests, and employees, while being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. The Town of Estes Park will make reasonable accommodations for access to Town services, programs, and activities and special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call (970) 577-4777. TDD available. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:00 p.m.  Public reception for Costa Rican Exchange Students will be held at 6:30 p.m., prior to the Town Board Meeting. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. (Any person desiring to participate, please join the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance). AGENDA APPROVAL. PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address). TOWN BOARD COMMENTS / LIAISON REPORTS. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Bills. 2. Town Board Minutes dated June 25, 2019 and Town Board Study Session Minutes dated June 25, 2019. 3. Town Board Strategic Planning Study Session Minutes dated June 26, 2019. 4. Approval of Governance Policy 1.10 Self-Monitoring of the Board. LIQUOR ITEMS: 1. NEW LODGING & ENTERTAINMENT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR CS & CS LLC, dba COFFEE ON THE ROCKS, 510 MORAINE AVENUE, ESTES PARK, CO 80517. Town Clerk Williamson. Public hearing to consider a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff for Town Board Final Action. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: A. ORDINANCE 16-19 AMENDMENT TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE §5.1 B. VACATION HOME TO REVISE THE DEADLINE FOR ("CAP") NUMBER OF VACATION HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. Planner Hardin. A request to continue item to September 24, 2019. Prepared 06-28-2019 *Revised 07-05-2019 1 NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 2. ACTION ITEMS: A. RESOLUTION 19-19 TO REAFFIRM MAXIMUM TOTAL ("CAP") NUMBER OF VACATION HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. Planner Hardin. Review current conditions as required by code, and determine if the cap number should be adjusted or remain at 588. B. ORDINANCE 17-19 REZONING OF WILDFIRE HOMES ADDITION, 16.08 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON WILDFIRE ROAD WEST OF DRY GULCH ROAD, WESTOVER CONSTRUCTION, RDA ASSOCIATES, LLC, AND CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK, OWNERS. Planner Woeber. Proposal to rezone from CH-Commercial Heavy, O-Office, E-Estate and RE-Rural Estate, to O-Office, E-Estate, R-Single Family Residential, and RM-Multi-Family Residential. C. PRELIMINARY PLAT, WILDFIRE HOMES SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON WILDFIRE ROAD WEST OF DRY GULCH ROAD, WESTOVER CONSTRUCTION, RDA ASSOCIATES, LLC, AND CROSSROADS MINISTRY OF ESTES PARK, OWNERS. Planner Woeber. A request to subdivide four separate parcels into two Blocks, with a total of 43 lots. ACTION ITEMS: 1. ESTES PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST. Request for moving expenses from Visitor’s Center to U.S. Bank building. 2. RESOLUTION 20-19 ADOPTION OF THE ESTES VALLEY STORMWATER MASTER PLAN. Manager Hook. 3. ORDINANCE 18-19 FOR 2019 TO 2022 WATER RATE INCREASE. Director Bergsten and Superintendent Eshelman. Final public hearing on proposed water rate increases and adopt an ordinance to implement new rates. 4. POWER & COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION PURCHASE OF LOT 9, DEVILLE SUBDIVISION. Director Bergsten and Town Attorney White. ADJOURN. * 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 25, 2019 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 25th day of June, 2019. Present: Todd Jirsa, Mayor Cody Rex Walker, Mayor Pro Tem Trustees Carlie Bangs Marie Cenac Patrick Martchink Ron Norris Ken Zornes Also Present: Frank Lancaster, Town Administrator Travis Machalek, Assistant Town Administrator Greg White, Town Attorney Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Bunny Victoria Beers, Recording Secretary Absent: None Mayor Jirsa called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and all desiring to do so, recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA APPROVAL. It was moved and seconded (Norris/Bangs) to approve the Agenda moving Action Item 6 after the Consent Agenda, and it passed unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Ingrid Bush/Owner of The Barrel provided the Board with a history of the concerns by neighbors on Davis Hill regarding noise complaints from events at the establishment. She stated neighbors have not been respectful and have interfered with business operations. She requested the Board review the occurrences at the location. The Mayor requested staff provide additional information regarding the occurrences at the location to the Board for review. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Zornes stated the Open Lands Advisory Board meeting would be held on June 27, 2019. The Trustee chat which was held on June 19, had 19 attendees. He also attended the Estes Valley Land Trust breakfast on June 22, 2019 with Trustee Martchink. Additionally, he attended the area amateur radio club meeting adding the group were very instrumental during the 2013 flood and deserved recognition for their efforts. Trustee Norris stated he attended the Colorado Municipal League conference in Breckenridge where discussions included renewable energy, workforce housing and the upcoming AARP National Conference which would be held in Denver November 2019. Trustee Cenac attended the Ashley Doolittle Memorial Horse and Ranch Horse Show and stated the Rodeo would be held on July 8-13, 2019 with the parade taking place on July 9th at 10:30 a.m. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. Administrator Lancaster provided an update to the Town Board on the Strategic Plan. He stated the goal to revisit revisions and updates to the Stanley Historic District overlay zone is on hold due to the anticipated application for the Film Center. Implementation of the Downtown Wayfinding signs is behind schedule due to street and trail workload. He reviewed items which were not funded in the 2019 budget and would be removed from the plan. The review of the Town’s policy on marijuana sales would be removed from the plan due to the circulating marijuana petition. The adoption of an Annexation policy would DRAFT3 Board of Trustees – June 25, 2019 – Page 2 be placed on hold until the Joint meeting of the Town Board and County Commissioners in July 2019. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Bills. 2. Town Board Minutes dated June 11, 2019 and Town Board Study Session Minutes dated June 11, 2019. 3. Estes Valley Planning Commission Meeting minutes dated May 21, 2019 and Study Session minutes dated May 21, 2019 (acknowledgment only). 4. Transportation Advisory Board Minutes dated May 15, 2019 (acknowledgment only). 5. Parks Advisory Board Minutes dated May 16, 2019 (acknowledgment only). 6. Addendum to Professional Services Contract for an optional transition of FullStack staff to Town staff with Cramer Development Inc. dba FullStack. 7. Addendum to Professional Services Contract for an optional transition of eStraegy3 staff to Town staff with eStrategy3, LLC. 8. Broadband agreement for cloud-based telephone services with Alianza Inc. as budgeted within Broadband. 9. Professional Services Contract with Ridgesight, LLC for project management and various technical services as budgeted within Broadband. 10. Resolution 15-19 to support the grant application for a Great Outdoors Colorado Connect Initiative to construct a phase of the Fall River Trail Extension project. 11. Resolution 16-19 Setting the Public Hearing date of July 9, 2019 for a New Lodging & Entertainment Liquor License filed by CS & CS LLC, dba Coffee on the Rocks, 510 Moraine Avenue, Estes Park, CO 80517. 12. Revised Policy 650 - Town Investment. It was moved and seconded (Walker/Cenac) to approve the Consent Agenda, and it passed unanimously. 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff for Town Board Final Action. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: A. SUPPLEMENTAL CONDOMINIUM MAP #8, SUNDANCE CONDOMINIUMS, 1400 SIERRA SAGE LANE, KINLEY INVESTMENT, NATHAN KINLEY, OWNER/APPLICANT. It was moved and seconded (Norris/Martchink) to continue the Supplemental Condominium Map #8, Sundance Condominiums, to July 23, 2019, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: A. PRELIMINARY PLAT, GRADY MINOR SUBDIVISION, 625 W. ELKHORN AVENUE, PANORAMIC ESTES, LLC/OWNER. Planner Woeber stated the project is located north of West Elkhorn Avenue, east of James Street, and west of Far View Drive within Town limits. The request would subdivide one parcel approximately 2.29 acres into two lots. The property is zoned E-1 Estate with a one-acre minimum lot size and is developed with two single family homes and a detached garage. He stated the subdivision process was never finalized and recorded due to the owner passing prior to completing the process. Staff recommended the approval of the Grady Minor Subdivision. Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Martchink/Zornes) to approve the preliminary plat as presented. DRAFT4 Board of Trustees – June 25, 2019 – Page 3 B. ORDINANCE 09-19 AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS 9.2 AND 9.3 TO REMOVE RESTRICTIONS THAT LIMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (PUDS) TO THE CO (OUTLYING COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICTS. Planner Woeber stated during the May 14, 2019, meeting the Board requested staff provide more information regarding the restrictions limiting PUD’s. He stated the use is a regulatory tool which can be used for creative development. Current PUD regulations are not useful and are rarely utilized. The change would allow PUD’s in all zoning districts within the development area. Motivation by staff to move forward was due to conversations initiated by Windcliff Homeowners Association. Per the Development Code any review would require both Planning Commission and the respective elected body review. Staff does not anticipate an increase in PUD’s after the code change. Planner Woeber found it difficult to find comparable municipalities utilizing PUD’s and provided examples of PUD use related to the possible use in the Estes Valley. Staff recommended the approval of the ordinance. Board questions have been summarized: Whether a commercial enterprise would be allowed to develop in a residential zoning district with the changes; the existence of any process implications staff could anticipate due to an increase in PUD applications; and whether PUD’s are common to a specific zoning district. David Yale/County citizen questioned whether staff has seen PUD’s in established neighborhoods. Ken Smith/Town citizen stated he has never run into a code regulation limited to a certain zoning district and finds the use of a PUD’s as a useful development tool. Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing and Attorney White read the ordinance into the record. It was moved and seconded (Cenac/Bangs) to approve Ordinance 09-19 and it passed with Mayor Pro Tem Walker recusing himself. 3. ACTION ITEMS: 1. APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC. AS BOND UNDERWRITER FOR THE 2019 POWER AND COMMUNICATIONS REVENUE BONDS. Director Hudson stated the item would appoint the bond underwriting firm working with the Town to issue Power and Communications Revenue Bonds to fund completion of the smart meter system and installation of a fiber-to-premises broadband network. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Walker/Norris) to approve the appointment of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc., as Bond Underwriter for the 2019 Power and Communications Revenue Bonds, and it passed unanimously. 2. RESOLUTION 17-19 TO APPROVE THE USE OF DESIGN BUILD CONCEPT FOR BROADBAND NETWORK CONSTRUCTION. Line Superintendent Lockhart stated the resolution gives the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem authority to execute broadband contracts over $100,000 without a Board decision. Advantages of the authority included flexibility in design implementation of construction methods and reduced expenditures. Trustee Norris encouraged staff to set clear expectations upfront to complete the build with minimal changes. Trustee Martchink questioned the ability for staff to bring items to the Board if the authority given to the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem affects the progress of the project or raises staff concern. Staff stated the Board can rescind the authority through a resolution approved by the Board. Mayor Pro Tem Walker requested the last “Whereas” in the resolution include “in the Mayor’s absence” for consistency. After further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Walker/Norris) to approve Resolution 17-19 with the noted change by Mayor Pro Tem Walker, and it passed unanimously. DRAFT5 Board of Trustees – June 25, 2019 – Page 4 3. RESOLUTION 18-19 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS. Mayor Jirsa opened the public hearing. Director Hudson stated the budget amendment formalizes the new Town Attorney department, reclassifying Code Enforcement from Community Development to the Police Department, additional costs for the recall election and additional items outlined in the packet. After further discussion by the Board, it was determined the Housing Authority funding in the amount of $51,000, be removed and brought to the July 9, 2019 Town Board meeting for additional discussion. John Meisner/Town citizen requested clarification on the office location for the Attorney. Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Walker/Norris) to approve Resolution 18-19 with the removal of the funds for the Housing Authority in the amount of $51,000 for discussion during the July 9, 2019 Board meeting, and it passed unanimously. 4. ORDINANCE 15-19 AMENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE APPLICATION AND REVIEW OF PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. Mayor Jirsa opened the public hearing. Planner Woeber requested an additional extension of the moratorium for application review of any park and recreation facilities, in any residential zoning district, to August 19, 2019. The extension was requested in order for the Board of County Commissioners to hear the code amendment at their August meeting on August 19, 2019. Mayor Jirsa closed the public hearing and Attorney White read the changes to the ordinance into record. It was moved and seconded (Cenac/Norris) to approve Ordinance 15-19 extending the temporary moratorium to August 19, 2019, and it passed with Mayor Pro Tem Walker abstaining and Jirsa voting “no”. 5. INTERVIEW COMMITTEE FOR ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. It was moved and seconded (Martchin/Walker) to appoint Trustees Cenac and Norris to the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Interview Committee, and it passed unanimously. 6. MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN MID-TERM ADJUSTMENT. In 2015 the Town eliminated coverage for spouses due to a 30% renewal increase as a result of increased spousal claims. In order to maintain coverage for staff and dependents the Town chose to eliminate spousal coverage. Circumstances have changed and a proposal was presented. Staff requested the Board consider mid-year coverage for spouses who currently are not eligible for medical insurance coverage through their employer. The impact to the budget is approximately $95,000 for approximately 49 spouses. Jeff Clark/Town citizen stated his support for medical coverage for spouses and its importance for employee retention. If approved staff would provide a special enrollment for medical only to include spousal coverage beginning July 7, 2019-July 15, 2019 effective beginning August 1, 2019. After further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Walker/Cenac) to approve the modification of the medical insurance plan mid-year adjustment to allow medical coverage to spouses who currently do not have insurance provided by their employer, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 8:31 p.m. Todd Jirsa, Mayor Bunny Victoria Beers, Recording Secretary DRAFT6 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado June 25, 2019 Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the TOWN BOARD of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in the Board Room in said Town of Estes Park on the 25th day of June, 2019. Board: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustees Bangs, Cenac, Martchink, Norris and Zornes Attending: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustees Bangs, Cenac, Martchink, Norris and Zornes Also Attending: Town Administrator Lancaster, Assistant Town Administrator Machalek, Town Attorney White and Recording Secretary Disney Absent: None Mayor Jirsa called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. PROCESS FOR BOARD REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNANCE POLICIES. Town Administrator Lancaster presented the draft Governance Policy 1.10 Self-Monitoring of the Board. He detailed The Policy Governance Manual chapter dealing with Governance Process and the roles and responsibilities of the Board of Trustees and Mayor. No formal policy exists for evaluating compliance with the Governance Process and the Board has expressed interest in developing a process for regular compliance. Governing Policy 1.10 Self-Monitoring of the Board was drafted, which would provide for regular review of applicable portions of the Governing Policies. The Board discussed reviewing the effectiveness of the drafted policy and the timeline for reviewing compliance. It was determined to add the policy as a consent agenda item for July 9, 2019. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM AND COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM. Manager Hook presented the discussion on proposed revisions to the Town’s floodplain regulations. He detailed the Town’s participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and explained the Community Rating System, which the Town does not currently participate in. Deficiencies have been found in the Town’s current floodplain regulation which must be corrected for continued NFIP participation. Additionally, the Town has received recommendations to employ the Colorado Hazard Mapping Program (CHAMP) data as the best available data for regulations. Staff proposed developing a revised floodplain regulation using CHAMP data and to continue efforts in examining observed flood elevations from the 2013 flood as compared to the 2014 Matrix hydrology study and 2017 Wright Water Engineers hydrology study. The Board discussed NFIP participation requirements, benefits of regulating to CHAMP data as related to Letter of Map Revisions, and sales tax funding for stormwater. It was determined to further discuss draft regulations at the July 9, 2019 Town Board Study Session. TRUSTEE & ADMINSTRATOR COMMENTS & QUESTIONS. Trustee Norris stated he attended the Colorado Municipal League Annual Conference where renewable energy, workforce housing, and state and local government collaboration was discussed. He recommended a Trustee attend the 2019 AARP National Conference as a representative of the Town. Trustee Bangs requested the Board consider the process of commissioning a mural in town. It was determined to employ the same process as other Art in Public Places projects. DRAFT7 Town Board Study Session – June 25, 2019 – Page 2 Mayor Jirsa stated a Costa Rica exchange students’ reception would be held before the the July 9, 2019 Town Board Meeting. FUTURE STUDY SESSION AGENDA ITEMS. Town Administrator Lancaster stated a discussion of electric vehicle charging in town and a discussion of building maintenance code would be added to a future Study Session agenda. There being no further business, Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 6:43 p.m. Kimberly Disney, Recording Secretary DRAFT8 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado June 26, 2019 Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the TOWN BOARD of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in the Rooms 202/203 in said Town of Estes Park on the 26th day of June 2019. Board: Mayor Jirsa, Mayor Pro Tem Walker, Trustees Bangs, Cenac, Martchink, Norris and Zornes Attending: Mayor Jirsa, Trustees Bangs, Cenac, Martchink, Norris and Zornes Also Attending: Town Administrator Lancaster, Assistant Town Administrator Machalek, Directors Bergsten, Hinkle, Hudson, Hunt, Muhonen, Chief Kufeld and Recording Secretary Beers Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Walker and Town Clerk Williamson Mayor Jirsa called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. REVIEW OF DRAFT 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN. Administrator Lancaster reviewed input provided during the April 3, 2019 and April 25, 2019 sessions. Content was not changed though redundancies were removed. A final review of the plan was conducted with staff providing input to the Board and items were added to the plan. Next steps would include a final revision and public outreach for adoption in August 2019. There being no further business, Mayor Jirsa adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. Bunny Victoria Beers, Recording Secretary DRAFT9       10 TOWN ADMINISTRATOR Memo To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees From: Town Administrator Lancaster Date: July 9, 2019 RE: Approval of Governing Policy 1.10: Self-Monitoring of the Board PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER_ policy____ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Approval of new governing policy 1.10, regarding Board self-monitoring of compliance with Governing policies Present Situation: The Board of Trustees has operated under a modified version of Policy Governance for several years. The first chapter of the Policy Governance Manual deals with the Governance Process and the role and responsibilities of the Board of Trustees and the Mayor. These provisions are self-enforcing. Currently there is no formal policy on how the Board evaluates their compliance with the governing policies. At a previous Board meeting this spring, the Board discussed developing a formal process for regular compliance review of their governing policies, similar to what is currently done for the Town Administrator’s compliance with the Staff Limitations policies. This policy was reviewed and discussed by the Board at the last study session and is coming forward for adoption. Proposal: Approve Governing Policy, Policy 1.10, has been drafted, entitled “Self-Monitoring of the Board.” Advantages: • Provides for periodic review of Board compliance with their Governing Policies. • Issues can be addressed early, before they become a problem. • By discussing the policies on a regular basis, Board members can ensure their interpretations of policies are consistent. • Provides accountability to each other regarding the adopted Governing policies 11 Disadvantages: • Time will be taken to do the review • There could be conflict visible on some issues during the review • Potential for the review to be inappropriately used for political posturing or positioning. Action Recommended: Approval of Governing Policy 1.10 Finance/Resource Impact: none Level of Public Interest Medium to high Sample Motion: (only if pulled from consent agenda.) I move to approve Governing Policy 1.10 regarding Self-Monitoring of the Board Attachments: Governing policy 1.10 12 1 POLICY TYPE: GOVERNANCE PROCESS POLICY 1.10 POLICY TITLE: SELF - MON I TORI NG OF THE BOARD The Board of Trustees will systematically and rigorously monitor compliance with these adopted policies, both individual and collectively, to determine the extent to which policies are being followed. Accordingly: 1.10.1. The purpose of monitoring is simply to determine the degree to which Board policies are being met. Monitoring will be as automatic as possible, using a minimum of Board time so that meetings can focus on creating the future. 1.10.2 Self-monitoring of compliance with these policies will be completed by the Town Board twice a year, in August and February at a regularly scheduled Board Study Session. Monitoring shall be on an exception basis. (a) The Town Administrator will notify the Board of the scheduled self-monitoring session a minimum of two weeks prior to the meeting. (b) Each Board member should review the policy list in section 1.10.6 prior to the scheduled study session (c) Any Board member who has a concern about compliance with any of the policies listed in 1.10.6, or who wishes to discuss the content or interpretation of any of the policies, should notify the Mayor at least one week prior to the meeting. (d) Discussion at the Study Session will be limited to those polices brought to the attention of the Mayor by a member of the Board. All other policies shall be deemed in compliance. 1.10.3 In every case, the Board of Trustees will judge whether (a) the interpretation is reasonable, and (b) whether data demonstrate accomplishment of, or compliance with, the Town Board’s interpretation. 1.10.4 In every case, the standard for compliance shall be “any reasonable Town Trustee’s individual interpretation” of the Board of Trustees’ policy being monitored however, the Board of Trustees is the final judge of reasonableness, and will always judge with a “reasonable person” test (what a reasonably prudent person would do in that context). Interpretations favored by individual board members do not constitute a “reasonable person” test. 1.10.5 Actions determined to be not compliant with a reasonable interpretation of Board of 13 2 Trustees’ policies will be subject to a process agreed to by the Town Board. 1.10.6. Town Board Compliance Review Schedule P Method GOVERNING POLICY REVIEW DATE 1.1 Governance Style Aug & Feb (2)(5)-(11) Aug & Feb 1.3 Board Job Description 1.3.1.1.C.i Board Communication Aug & Feb 1.3.1.3 Performance review of Town Administrator and Town Attorney Aug & Feb 1.3.2.3 Quasi-Judicial Actions Aug & Feb 1.3.2.4 Trustee Communications Aug & Feb 1.4 Mayor’s Responsibility 1.4.1 Meeting Leadership Aug & Feb 1.4.3 Refraining from Unauthorized Unilateral Actions Aug & Feb 1.4.4 Representation Aug & Feb 1.4.7.2 Special Assignments Aug & Feb 1.6 Board Committee Principles 1.6.1 Committees Appointed by the Board 1.6.1.1 Aug & Feb 1.6.1.2 Aug & Feb 1.6.1.4 Aug & Feb 1.6.1.6 Aug & Feb 1.6.1.7 Aug & Feb 1.6.2 Outside Committees 1.6.2.1 – Official Representation Aug & Feb 1.6.2.2 b&c Individual Representation Aug & Feb 1.7 Board Liaison Roles 1.7.1 Mayoral Appointments Aug & Feb 1.7.3 Duties of A Liaison Aug & Feb 1.8 Board Standing Committees 1.8.2 Use of Board Committees Aug & Feb 1.8.3 Principles for Board Committees Aug & Feb 1.9 Annual Planning and Agendas 1.9.1 Annual Planning Aug & Feb 14 3 Adopted Town Policies 103 Town Board Code of Conduct and Operating Principles Biannually – following Town Board Elections 107 Board E-mails Annually March Adopted 7/9/2019 15       16 TOWN CLERK Memo To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through Town Administrator Lancaster From: Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Date: July 9, 2019 RE: Liquor Licensing: New Lodging & Entertainment Liquor License Application for CS & CS LLC dba Coffee on the Rocks, 510 Moraine Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado Objective: Approval of a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license located at 510 Moraine Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Application filed by CS & CS LLC dba Coffee on the Rocks. Present Situation: An application for a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license was received by the Town Clerk’s office on May 28, 2019. All necessary paperwork and fees were submitted; please see the attached Procedure for Hearing on Application – New Liquor License for additional information. The applicant is aware of the Town Board’s Training for Intervention Procedures (TIPS) requirement and has not been schedule at the time of this memo. Proposal: To present the application for the Town Board’s review and consideration for a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license. Advantages: Approval of the license provides the business owner with the opportunity to operate a liquor-licensed establishment in the Town of Estes Park. Disadvantages: The owner is denied a business opportunity to serve alcohol to patrons. Action Recommended: Approval of the application for a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license. Budget: The fee paid to the Town of Estes Park for a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license is $1,319.00. The fee covers the administrative costs related to processing the application, background checks, and business licensing. In addition, the annual 17 renewal fee payable to the Town of Estes Park for a Lodging & Entertainment Liquor license is $869. Level of Public Interest Low Sample Motion: The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are/are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are/are not for the granting of this liquor license. Based upon these findings, I move that the application for a new Lodging & Entertainment liquor license filed by CS & CS LLC dba Coffee on the Rocks be approved/denied. Attachments: Procedure for Hearing Application Individual History Police Report 18 ColoradoLiquorRetailLicenseApplicationOR5404(12121/18)COLORADODEPARTMENTOFREVENUELiquorEnforcementDivision(303)205-2300RECERJ’EDMAY282019IESI]NewLicenseKNew-ConcurrentQTransferofOwnershipState•Allanswersmustbe printedinblackinkortypewritten•Applicantmustchecktheappropriatebox(es)•ApplicantshouldobtainacopyoftheColoradoLiquorandBeerCode:wvnv.co!orado.govlenforcemenUllquor1.Applicantisapplyingasa/anflIndividualLimitedLiabilityCompanyAssociationorOtherCorporationUPartnership(includesLimitedLiabilityandHusbandandWifePartnerships)2.ApplicantIfanLLC,nameofLLC;ifpartnership,atleast2partnersnames;ifcorporation,nameofcorporationFEINNumberCsa-csL%Lc-—2a.TradeNameotablishmeni(DBA)StateSalesTaxNumberBusinessTelephone.---‘--93btç-ng3.AddressofPremises(specifyexactlocationofpremises,Includesuite/unitnumbers)cCityCountyStateZIPCodeEste&rkLgy’jn,r(oBorg;4.MailingAddress(NumberandStreet)CitorTwnStateZIPCode&.L5.EmailAddresscoVrflocnzLco6.Ifthepremisescurrentlyhasaliquororbeerflense,youmustanswerthefollowingquestionsPresentTradeNameofEL?blishmer..jDBA)PresentStateLicenseNumberPresentClassofLicensePresentExpirationDate.-.-,---,.SectionANonrefundableApplicationFeesSectionB(cont)LiquorLicenseFeesApplicationFeeforNewLicense$55000ULodging&Entertainment-L&E(County)$500.00Applicat1onFeeforNewLicensew/ConcuuentReview$650.00UManagerRegtration-H&R$75.00UApplicationFeeforTransfer$550.00UManagerRegistration-Tavem$75.00SectionBLiquorLicenseFeesUManagerRegistration-Lodging&Entertainment$75.00UAddOptionalPrensestoH&R$100.00XUManagerRegistration-CampusLiquorComplex575.00UUMasterFileLocationFee$25.00XTotalAddRelatedFacilitytoResortComplexS75.00XTotalUArtsLicense(City)$308.75UMasterFileBackground$250.00XUMsLicense(County)$308.75UOptionalPremisesLicense(City)$500.00UBeerandWineLicense(City)$351.25UOptionalPremisesLicense(County)$500.00UBeerandWineLicense(County)$436.25[1RacetrackLicense(City)$500.00UBrewPubLicense(City)575000URacetrackLicense(County)$500.00UBrewPubLicense(County)$75000UResortComplexLicense(City)$500.00UCampusLiquorComplex(City)$500.00UResortComplexLicense(County)$500.00UCampusLiquorComplex(County)$500.00URelatedFacility-CampusLiquorComplex(City)$160.00UCampusLiquorComplex(State)$500.00URelatedFacility-CampusLiquorComplex(County)$160.00UClubLicense(City)$308.75URelatedFacility-CampusLiquorComplex(State)$160.00UClubLicense(County)$308.75URetailCamb-igTavernUcense(Cfty)5500.00UDistilleryPubLicense(City)$750.00URetailGamgTavernLicense(County)$500.00UDistilleryPubLicense(County)$750.00URetailLiquorStoreLicense—MdWona)(City)$227.50UHotelandRestaurantLicense(City)$50000URetailLiquorStoreLicense—AddWonal(County)$312.50UHotelandRestaurantLicense(County)$500.00URetailLiquorStore(City)$227.50UHotelandRestaurantLicensew/oneoptpremises(City)$600.00URetailLiquorStore(County)$312.50UHotelandRestaurantLicensew/oneoptpremises(County)$600.00UTavernLicense(City),$500.00ULiquor-licensedDrugstore(City)$227.50UTavernLicense(County)$500.00ULiquor-licensedDrugstore(County)$312.50UVinthersRestaurantLicense(City)$750.00Lodging&Entertainment-L&E(City)$500.00UVinhersRestaurantLicense(County)$750.00Questions?Visit:www.colorado.gov/enforcementliquorformoreinformation‘Donotwriteinthisspace-ForDepartmentofRevenueuseonlyLiabilityInformationLicenseAccountNumberLiabilityDateLicenseIssuedThrough(ExpirationDate)Total$19 DR8404(12/21(18)ApplicationDocumentsChecklistandWorksheetInstructions:Thischecklistshouldbeutilizedtoassistapplicantswithfilingallrequireddocumentsforlicensure.Alldocumentsmustbeproperlysignedandcorrespondwiththenameoftheapplicantexactly.Alldocumentsmustbetypedorlegiblyprinted.UponfinalStateapprovalthelicensewillbemailedtothelocallicensingauthority.Applicationfeesarenonrefundable.Questions?Visit:www.co!orado.gov/enforcement4iquorformore informationItemssubmitted,pleasecheckallappropriateboxescompletedordocumentssubmittedApplicantinformationLIA.Applicant/LicenseeidentifiedCB.StatesalestaxlicensenumberlistedorappliedforattimeofapplicationCC.Licensetypeorother transactionidentifiedCD.ReturnoriginalstolocalauthorityoF.AdditionalinformationmayberequiredbythelocallicensingauthorityCFAllsectionsoftheapplicationneedtobecompletedII.DiagramofthepremisesLIA.Nolargerthan81/2”X11LIB.Dimensionsincluded(doesnothavetobetoscale).Exteriorareasshouldshowtypeofcontrol(fences,walls, entry/exitpoints,etc.)LIC.Separatediagramforeachfloor(ifmultiplelevels)LID.Kitchen-identifiedifHotel andRestaurantLIE.Bold/OutlinedLicensedPremisesIll.Proofofpropertypossession(OneYearNeeded)CA.Deedinnameoftheapplicant(or)(matchingquestion#2)datestamped/filedwithCountyClerkoB.Leaseinthenameoftheapplicant(or)(matchingquestion#2)LIC.LeaseassignmentinthenameoftheapplicantwithproperconsentfromtheLandlordandacceptancebytheApplicantLID.Otheragreementifnotdeedorlease.(matchingquestion#2)(Attachpriorleasetoshowrighttoassumption)IV.BackgroundinformationandfinancialdocumentsLIA.IndividualHistoryRecords(s)(FormDR8404-I)LIB.Fingerprintstaken andsubmittedtotheappropriateLocalLicensingAuthoritythroughanapprovedStateVendor.MasterFileapplicantssubmitresultstotheStateusingcode25YQHTwithIdentocO.TheVendorsareasfollows:IdentoGO-https://uenrolLidentogo.com/Phone:(844)539-5539(toll-free)IdentoGOFAQs:https:llwww.colorado.gov/pacillc/cbifldentification-faqsColoradoFingerprintingbyAmericanBioldentity—DetailstobeannouncedLIC.Purchaseagreement,stocktransferagreement,and/orauthorizationtotransferlicenseLID.Listofallnotesandloans(Copiestoalsobeattached)V.Soleproprietor/husbandandwifepartnership(ifapplicable)LIA.FormDR4679LIB.CopyofStateissuedDriver’sLicenseorColoradoIdentificationCardforeachapplicantVI.Corporateapplicantinformation(ifapplicable)LIA.CertificateofIncorporationdatestampedbytheColoradoSecretaryofState’sOfficeLIB.CertificateofGoodStandingLIC.CertificateofAuthorizationifforeigncorporationLID.Listofofficers,directorsandstockholdersofapplyingcorporation(Ifwhollyowned,designateaminimumofonepersonasprincipalofficerofparent)VII.Partnershipapplicantinformation(ifapplicable)LIA.PartnershipAgreement(generalorlimited).NotneededifhusbandandwifeLIB.CertificateofGoodStanding(Ifformedafter2009)VIII.LimitedLiabilityCompanyapplicantinformation(ifapplicable)LIA.Copyofarticlesoforganization(datestampedbyColoradoSecretaryofState’sOffice)LIB.CertificateofGoodStandingLIC.CopyofoperatingagreementLID.CertificateofAuthorityifforeigncompanyIX.ManagerregistrationforHotelandRestaurant,Tavern,Lodging&Entertainment,andCampusLiquorComplexlicenseswhenincludedwiththisapplicationCA.$75.00feeCB.IndividualHistoryRecord(DR8404-I)LIC.Ifownerismanaging,nofeerequired220 DR6404(12/21/18)NameTypeofLicense1AccountNumber7.Istheapplicant(includinganyofthepartnersifapartnership;membersormanagersifalimitedliabilitycompany:orofficers,YesNostockholdersordirectorsifacorporation)ormanagersundertheageoftwenty-oneyears?DB.Hastheapplicant(includinganyofthepartnersifapartnership;membersormanagersifalimitedliabilitycompany;orofficers,slockholdersordirectorsifacorporation)ormanagersever(inColoradooranyotherstate):(a)Beendeniedanalcoholbeveragelicense?(b)Hadanalcoholbeveragelicensesuspendedorrevoked?U(c)Hadinterestinanotherentitythathadanalcoholbeveragelicensesuspendedorrevoked?UIfyouansweredyestoBa,bore,explainindetailonaseparatesheet9.Hasaliquorlicenseapplication(samelicenseclass),thatwaslocatedwithin500feetoftheproposedpremises,beendeniedwithintheUiprecedingtwoyears?If‘yes”,explainIndetail.10.Arethepremisestobelicensedwithin500feet,ofanypublicorprivateschoolthatmeetscompulsoryeducationrequirementsofColoradolaw,ortheprincipalcampusofanycollege,universityorseminary?orWaiverbylocalordinance?UUOther:11.IsyourLiquorLicensedDrugstore(LLDS)orRetailLiquorStore(RLS)within1500feetofanotherretailliquorlicenseforoff-premisessalesinajurisdictionwithapopulationofgreaterthan(>)10,0000?NOTE:ThedistanceshallbedeterminedbyaradiusmeasurementthatbeginsattheprincipaldoorwayoftheLLDS/RLSpremisesforwhichtheapplicationIsbeingmadeandendsattheprincipaldoorwayoftheLicensedLLDSIRLS.12.IsyourLiquorLicensedDrugstore(LLDS)orRetailLiquorStore(RLS)within3000feetofanotherretailliquorlicenseforoff-premisessalesinajurisdictionwithapopulationoflessthan(<)10.00007NOTE:ThedistanceshallbedeterminedbyaradiusmeasurementthatbeginsattheprincipaldoorwayoftheLLDS/RLSpremisesforwhichtheapplicationisbeingmadeandendsattheprincipaldoorwayoftheLicensedLLOSIRLS.I3a.ForadditionalRetailLiquorStareonly.WasyourRetailLiquorStoreLicenseissuedonorbeforeJanuary1•2016?U113b.AreyouaColoradoresident??7fU14.Hasaliquororbeerlicenseeverbeenissuedtotheapplicant(includinganyofthepartners,ifapartnership;membersormanagerifaLimitedLiabilityCompany;orofficers,stockholdersordirectorsifacorporation)?Ifyesidepfythenameofthebusiness,.ndlistany‘Ucurrentfinancialinterestinsaidbusinessincludingany loanstoorfromalicensee.(,cta.aor.LSo_‘k_,15.Doestheapplicant,aslistedonline2ofthisappication.havelegalpossessionofthe premisesbyownershIp,leaseorotherarrangement?&wnership‘teaseUOther(ExplaininDetail)a.Ifleased,listnameoflandlordandtenantanddateofexpiration,exactlyastheyappearonthelease:LandlordTenantExpiresCCb.Isapercentageofalcohblsalesincludedascompensationtothelandlord?Ifyes,completequestion16.U—c.AttachadiagramthatdesignatestheareatobelicensedInblackboldoutline(includingdimensions)whichshowsthebars,brewery,walls,padWons,entrances,exitsandwhateachroomshall be utilizedforInthisbusiness.Thisdiagramshouldbenolargerthan61/2’X1?.16.Who,besidestheownerslistedinthisapplication(includingpersons,firms,partnerships,corporations,limitedliabilitycompanies)willloanorgivemoney,inventory,frqitureorequipmenttoorforuseInthisbusiness;orwhowillreceivemoneyfromthisbusiness?Attachaseparatesheetifnecessary.(ULastNameFirstNameDateofBirthFEINorSSNInterest/PercentageLastNameFirstNameDateof BirthFEINorSSNlnteresUPercenlageAttachcopiesofallnotesandsecurityInstrumentsand anywrittenagreementordetailsofanyoralagreement,bywhichanyperson(Includingpartnerships,corporations,limitedliabilitycompanies,etc.)willshareintheprofitorgrossproceedsofthisestablIshment,andanyagreementrelatingtothebusinesswhichIscontingentorconditionalInanywaybyvolume,profit,sales,givingofadvIceorconsultation.17, OptionalPremisesorHotelandRestaurantLicenseswithOptionalPremises:Hasalocalordinanceorresolutionauthorizingoptionalpremisesbeenadopted?UNumberofadditionalOptionalPremiseareasrequested.(Seelicensefeechartil18.LiquorLicensedDrugstore(LLDS)applicants,answerthefollowing:(a)Isthereapharmacy,licensedbytheColoradoBoardofPharmacy,locatedwithintheapplicant’sLLDSpremise?UIf“yes’1acopyoflIcensemustbeattached.19.ClubLiquorLicenseapplicantsanswerthefollowing:AttachacopyofapplicabledocumentationI_________(a)Istheappcantorganizationoperatedsolelyforanational,social,fraternal,pathonc,politicalorathleticpurposeandnotforpecuniarygain?UI!]’(b)Istheapplicantorganizationaregularlycharteredbranch,lodgeorchapterofanationalorganizationwhichIsoperatedsolelyfortheobjectofapatrioticorfratemalorganizationorsociety,butnotforpecuniarygain?_________(c)Howlonghastheclubbeenincorporated?I(d)Hasapplicantoccupiedanestablishmentforthreeyears(threeyearsrequired)thatwasoperatedsolelyforthereasons statedabove?Ue20.Brew-Pub,DistilleryPuborVintnersRestaurantapplicantsanswerthefollowing:(a)HastheapplicantreceivedorappliedforaFederalPermit?(Copyofpermitor applicationmustbeattached)321 DR8404(12121/18)NameTypeofLicenseAccountNumber21.CampusLiquorComplexapplicantsanswerthefollowing:(a)Istheapplicantaninstitutionofhighereducation?YesNo0(b)Istheapplicantapersonwhocontractswiththeinstitutionofhighereducationtoprovidefoodservices?E EIf“yes’pleaseprovideacopyofthecontractwiththeInstitutionofhighereducationtoprovidefoodservices.22.Forallon-premisesapplicants.a.HotelandRestaurant, LodgingandEntertainment,TavernLicenseandCampusLiquorComplex,theRegisteredManagermustalsosubmitanIndividualHistoryRecordDR8404-IandfingerprintsubmittedtoapprovedStateVendorthroughtheVendor’swebsite.Seeapplicationchecklist,SectionIV,fordetails.IiFarallLiquorLicensedDrugstores(LIDS)thePermittedManagermustalsosubmitanManagerPermitApplication-DR8000andfingerprints.LastNameofMnnprFirstNameofMaager5-*\-23.Doesthismanageractasthemanagerof,orhaveafinancialinterestIn,anyotherliquorlicensedestablishmentintheStateofColorado?Ifyes, providename,typeoflicenseandaccountnumber.24.RelatedFacility-CampusLiquorComplexapplicantsanswerthefollowing:YesNoa.IstherelatedfacilitylocatedwithintheboundariesoftheCampusLiquorComplex?çIfyes,pleaseprovideamapofthegeographicallocationwithintheCampusLiquorComplex.Ifno,thislicensetypeisnotavailableforissuesoutsidethegeographicallocationoftheCampusLiquorComplex.b.DesignatedManagerforRelatedFacility-CampusLiquorComplexLastNameofManagerFirstNameofManager25.TaxDistraintInformation.Doestheapplicantoranyotherpersonlistedonthisapplicationincludingitspartners,officers,directors,stockholders,members(LLC)ormanagingmembers(LLC)andanyotherpersonswitha10%orgreaterfinancialinterestintheapplicantcurrentlyhaveanoutstandingtaxdistraintissuedtothembytheColoradoDepartmentofRevenue?Iiyes,provideanexplanationandincludecopiesofanypaymentagreements.26.Ifapplicantisacorporation,partnership,associationorlimitedliabilitycompany,applicantmustlistallOfficers,Directors,GeneralPartners,andManagIngMembers,Inaddition,applicantmustlistanystockholders,partners,ormemberswithownershipof10%ormoreintheapplicant.AllpersonslistedbelowmustalsoattachformDR8404-I(IndividualHistoryRecord),andmakeanappointmentwithanapprovedStateVendorthroughtheirwebsite.Seeapplicationchecklist,SectionIV,fordetails._______________________HomeAddressty&StateI136-Position%Owned‘Lo’aJt4a3C,C)lomeAddress,CityStatOBPosition%Owned((.I,14,(?--c.Iress,City&StateDOBPosition%OwnedNameHomeAddress,City&StateDOSPosition%OwnedNameHomeAddress,City&StateDOBPosition%OwnedIfapplicantisowned100%byaparentcompany,pleaselistthedesignatedprincipalofficeronabove.Corpomons-thePresident,Vice-President,SecretaryandTreasurermustbeaccountedforabove(IncludeownershippercentageWapphcable)9elownershippercentagedisclosedheredoesnottotal100%,applicantmust checkthisbox:‘Applicantaffirmsthatnoindividualotherthanthesedisclosedhereinowns10%ormoreoftheapplicantanddoesnothavefinancialinterestinaprohibitedliquorlicensepursuanttoArticle3or5,CR5.NameTypeofUcenseAccountNumberOathOfApplicantIdeclareunderpenaltyofperjuryintheseconddegreethatthisapplicationandallattachmentsamhue,correct,andcompletetothebestofmyknowledge.IalsoacknowledgethatitismyresponsibilityandtheresponsibilityofmyagentsandemployeestocomplywiththeprovisionsoftheColoradoLiquororBeerCodewhichaffectmylicense.AuthorizedPriNamearue,)rd*gr[7eReportandApprovalofLocalLicensingAuthority(CitylCounty)DateapplicationfiledwithlocalauthorityDateof localauthorityhearing(fornewlicenseapplicants;cannotbelessthan30daysfromdateofapplicatan)M6t?fl,3i7Zztyg,1Ao/5422 OR8404(12/21/18)TheLocalLicensingAuthorityHerebyAWirrnsthateach personrequiredtofileDR8404-I(lndMdualHistoryRecord)oraDR8000(ManagerPermit)hasbeen:FingerprintedSubjecttobackgroundinvestigation,includingNCIC/CCICcheckforoutstandingwarrantsThatthelocalauthorityhasconducted,orintendstoconduct,aninspectionoftheproposedpremisestoensurethattheapplicantisincompliancewithandawareof,liquorcodeprovisionsaffectingtheirclassoflicense(CheckOne)CIstheLiquorLicensedDrugstore(LLDS)orRetailLiquorStore(RLS)within1,500feetofanotherretailliquorlicenseforoff-YesNopremisessalesinajurisdictionwithapopulationof>10,0000?CCLIIstheLiquorLicensedDrugstore(LLDS)orRetailLiquorStore(RLS)within3,000feetofanotherretailliquorlicenseforoff-premisessalesinajurisdictionwithapopulationof<10,0000?NOTE:ThedistanceshallbedeterminedbyaradiusmeasurementthatbeginsattheprincipaldoorwayoftheLLDS/RLSpremisesforwhichtheapplicationIsbeingmadeandendsattheprincipaldoorwayoftheLicensedLLDS/RLS.CDoestheLiquor-LicensedDrugstore(LLDS)haveatleasttwentypercent(20%)oftheapplicant’sgrossannualincomederivedfromthesaleoffood,duringthepriortwelve(12)monthperiod?Theforegoingapplicationhasbeenexamined:andthepremises,businesstobeconducted,andcharacteroftheapplicantaresatisfactory.Wedoreportthatsuchlicense,ifgranted.willmeetthereasonablerequirementsoftheneighborhoodandthedesiresoftheadultinhabitants,andwillcomplywiththeprovisionsofTitle44,Article4or3,C.RS.,andLiquorRules.Therefore,thisapplicationIsapproved.LocalLicensingAuthorityforTelephoneNumberSignaturePrintTitleSignaturePrintTitleCDateofInspectionoranticipateddate_______________________WillconductinsoectionuoonapprovalofstatelicensinoauthorityUTown,CityCcounty523 (Nri-vC)1-•L•c,%iTh-)yp———Ii-—5(tI-JCCoHSDN))Nt.C’24 :1-tO)rtC-’1--tC!)Co-t1’onN‘iIaS25 DR84044(08)10/16)COLORADODEPARTMENTOFREVENUELiquorEnforcementDivisionç301)205.2200MUSTBEACCOMPANIEDBYINDIVIDUALFINGERPRINTCARDSOBTAINEDFROMTHEPOLICEDEPARTMENTIndividualHistoryRecordTobecompletedbythefollowingpersons,asapplicable:soleproprietors;generalpartnersregardlessofpercentageownership,andlimitedpartnersowning10%ormoreofthepartnership;allprincipalofficersofacorporation,alldirectorsofacorporation,andanystockholderofacorporationowning10%ormoreoftheoutstandingstock;managingmembersorofficersofalimitedliabilitycompany,andmembersowning10%ormoreofthecompany;andanyintendedregisteredmanagerofHotelandRestaurant.TavernandLodgingand EntertainmentclassofretaillicenseNotice:Thisindividualhisloryrecordrequiresinformationthatisnecessaryforthelicensinginvestigationorinquiry.Allquestionsmustbeansweredintheirentiretyorthelicenseapplicationmaybedelayedordenied.Ifaquestionisnotapplicable,pleaseindicatesoby‘N/A”.Anydeliberatemisrepresentationormaterialomissionmayjeopardizethelicenseapplication.(Pleaseattachaseparatesheetifnecessarytoenableyoutoanswerquestionscompletely)1.NamBsinessHomehoneNumberCIlulNumbertbt(-sssod17374-63172.Vo,FullNameJist,first,midd)3.ListWnyothernamesyouhaveusid—Ccz_p.4tiiinadffflefrçce.çji1a’lAdssS.Listcurrentresidenceaddress.Includeanypreviousaddresseswithinthelastfiveyears.(Attachseparatesheetifnecessary)StreetandNumberCity,State,Zip1FromTo2513LLô,os-tSRerkfl-C35it1S773o15EJ&(SJUS,(SI.5o56.Listallemploymentwithinthelastfiveyears.Includeanyself-employment.(Attachseparatesheetifnecessary)NameofEmployerorBusinessAddress(Street,Number,City,State,Zip)PositionHeldFromTo9fcLWtckcrc,‘\l/rna9en.63ALfl-e.Jhie‘2n’-P&2Cj7.Listthename(s)ofrelativesworkinginorholdingafinancialinterestintheColoradoalcoholbeverageindustry.NameofRelativeRelationshiptoYouPositionHeldNameofLicenseeflnAQ8.Haveyoueverappliedfor,held, orhadaninterestinaColoradoLiquororBeerLicense,orloanedmoney,Nfurniture,fixtures,equipmentorinventorytoanylicensee?(Ifyes,answerindetail.),aYes0)J&ruLccee-2m979.Haveyoueverreceivedaviolationnotice,suspension,orrevocationforaliquorlawviolation,orhaveyouappliedfororbeendeniedaliquororbeerlicenseanywhereintheUnitedStates?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)L’1’e5NoQ”c.u“&1iftbr\TuVj4\Cj\Cst-ft-ZD(&cnJcfl’J5c26 10.Haveyoueverbeenconvictedofacrimeorreceivedasuspendedsentence,deferredsentence,or forfeitedbailforanyoffenseincriminalormilitarycourtordoyouhave anychargespending?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)YestNo11.Areyoucurrentlyunderprobation(supervisedorunsupervised),parole,orcompletingtherequirementsofadeferredsentence?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)YesNo12.Haveyoueverhad anyprofessionallicensesuspended,revoked,ordenied?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)flYesMNoPersonalandFinancialInformationUnlessotheiviiseprovidedbylaw,thepersonalinformationrequiredinquestion#13willbetreatedasconfidential.Thepersonalinformationrequiredinquestion#13issolelyforidentificationpurposes.13aDateof Birthb.SocialSecurityNumberIc.PlacfBirth—d,U.S.Citizen4Ø’esUNoe.IfNaturalized,statewheref.Wbn‘Jg.NameofDistrictCourth.NaturalizationCertificateNumberi.DateofCertificationj.IfanAtien,GeAien’sRegfsfrabonCard Numberk.PermanentResidenceCardNumberI.Heightm.Weightn.HairColoro.EyeColorp.Genderq.Racer.DoyouhaveacurrentDriver’sLicense/ID?Iso,g’wenumberandstate..‘t’‘q0S7e&2K(AcAc,jr\YesENo#State14.FinancialInformation.a.Tgftlniirrhsonrronr‘,estmentbeingmadebytheapplyingentity,corporation,partnership,limitedliabilitycompany,otherb.Listthetotalamountofthepersonalinvestmentmadebythepersonlistedonquestion#2inthisbittinessincludinnnvnotes, loans,cash,servicesorequipment,operatingcapital,stockpurchasesorfeespaid.0*IfcorporateinvestmentonlypleaseskiptoandcompletesectionCd)**Sectionbshouldreflectthetotalofsectionscandec.Providedetailsofthepersonalinvestmentdescribedin14b.Youmustaccountforallofthesourcesofthisinvestment.(Attachaseparatesheetifneeded)Type:Cash,ServicesorEquipmentAccountTypeBankNameAmountd.Providedetailsofthecorporateinvestmentdescribedin14(a).Youmustaccountforallofthesourcesofthisinvestment.(Attachaseparatesheetifneeded)e.LoanInformation(Attachcopiesofallnotesorloans)Type:CashServicesorEquipmentNameofLenderLoansAccountTypeAddressOathofApplicantIdeElareunderuenaltvofoeriurvthatthisaoolicationandallattachmentsaretrue.correct,andcomoletetothebestofmyRnowledae.TermBankNameSecurityAmountAmount7AiiffjzenarePriignatureTitleDate\iIL4Jv-.caXjStot’m27 DR8404-I(08/10/16)COLORADODEPARTMENTOFREVENUELiquorEnforcementDivision(3031205-2300IndividualHistoryRecordTobecompletedbythefollowingpersons,asapplicable:soleproprietors;generalpartnersregardlessofpercentageownership,andlimitedpartnersowning10%ormoreofthepartnership;allprincipalofficersofacorporation,alldirectorsofacorporation,andanystockholderofacorporationowning10%ormoreoftheoutstandingstock;managingmembersorofficersofalimitedliabilitycompany.andmembersowning10%ormoreof thecompany;and anyintendedregisteredmanagerofHotelandRestaurant,TavernandLodgingandEntertainmentclassofretaillicenseNotice:Thisindividualhistoryrecordrequiresinformationthatisnecessaryforthelicensinginvestigationorinquiry.Allquestionsmustbeansweredintheirentiretyorthelicenseapplicationmaybedelayedordenied.Ifaquestionisnotapplicable,pleaseindicatesoby“N/A”.Anydeliberatemisrepresentationormaterialomissionmayjeopardizethelicenseapplication.(Pleaseattachaseparatesheetifnecessarytoenableyoutoanswerquestionscompletely)1.NameofBusinessHomePhoneNumbercellularNumberc0q..-\\L.-rt,st-ar22.YurFullame(last,fist,‘ddle)3.Listanyothenamesyouhaveused&Xtct.\aJAtaaAJ04cLi4,Mailingaddress(ifdifferentfromresidence)EmailAddresOflorc%fla4nccArclbcgno\.Co’-.5.Listcurrentresidenceaddress.Includeanypreviousaddresseswithinthelastfiveyears.(Attachseparatesheetifnecessary)StreetandNumberCity,State,ZipFromToCurrentL\c\OT\orc,,.cLqIP-Ec%ej_(L__Ct>Previous6.Listallemploymentwithinthelastfiveyears.Includeanyself-employment.(Attachseparatesheetifnecessary)NameofEmployerorBusinessAddress(Street,Number,City,State,Zip)IPositionHeldFromToE1.{L£LO\pj.)(,.oo‘cL-c,cAc*y.Pr’,rcpd2o1,2.7.Listthename(s)ofrelativesworkinginorholdingafinancialinterestintheColoradoalcoholbeverageindustry.NameofRelativeN)RelationshiptoYou3.Haveyoueverappliedfor,held,orhadaninterestinaColoradoLiquororBeerLicense,orloanedmoney,furniture,fixtures,equipmentorinventorytoanylicensee?(Ifyes,answerindetail.)YesPositionHeldNameofLicensee9.Haveyoueverreceivedaviolationnotice,suspension,orrevocationforaliquorlawviolation,orhaveyouappliedfororbeendeniedaliquororbeerlicenseanywhereintheUnitedStates?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)YesNo28 10.Haveyoueverbeenconvictedofacrimeorreceivedasuspendedsentence,deterredsentence,orforfeitedbailforanyoffenseincriminalormilitarycourtordoyouhaveanychargespending?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)YesNo11.Areyoucurrentlyunderprobation(supervisedorunsupervised),parole,orcompletingtherequirementsofadeferredsentence?(Ifyes.explainindetail.)esNo12.Haveyoueverhadanyprofessionallicensesuspended,revoked,ordenied?(Ifyes,explainindetail.)DYesNoPersonalandFinancialInformationUnlessotherwiseprovidedbylaw,thepersonalinformationrequiredinquestion#13willbetreatedasconfidential.Thepersonalinformationrequiredinquestion#13issolelyforidentificationpurposes.13a.DateofBirthb.SocialSecurityNumberc,PIcofBirthj-—)“-f.Lottikid.U.SCitizenVesDNae.IfNaturalized,statewheref.Wheng.NameofDistrictCourth.NaturalizationCertificateNumberi,DateofCertificationjiIfanAlien,GiveAtien’sRegistrationCardNumberIcPermanentResidenceCardNumber14.FinancialInformation.a.Totalpurchasepriceorinvestmentbeingmadebytheapplyingentity,corporation,partnership,limitedliabilitycompany,other$0b.Listthetotalamountofthepersonalinvestment,madebythepersonlistedonquestion#2b-/-’Lidinganynotes,loans,cash,servicesorequipment,operatingcapital,stockpurchasesorfeespaid.____________________________*IfcorporateinvestmentonlypleaseskiptoandcompletesectionCd)**Sectionbshouldreflectthetotalofsectionscandec.Providedetailsofthepersonalinvestmentdescribedin14b.Youmustaccountforallofthesourcesofthisinvestment.(Attachaseparatesheetifneeded)Type:Cash,ServicesorEquipmentAccountTypeBankNameAmountCMreJ(,ccd.Providedetailsofthecorporateinvestmentdescribedin14(a).Youmustaccountforallofthesourcesofthisinvestment,(Attachaseparate_sheet_if_needed)Type:Cash,ServicesorEquipmentLoansAccountTypeBankNameAmounte.LoanInformation(Attachcopiesofallnotesorloans)NameofLenderAddressTermSecurityAmount‘E+?ckJjç5cjQ’vq(LaSP5UOathofApplicantIdeclaj-eunderpenaLtyofperjurythatthisapplicationandallattachmentsaretrue,correct,andcompletetothebestofmyknowledqe.I.HeightmWe:ghtn.HairColora.EyeColorp.Genderacefrjo0L1..ljiSj.poyouhaveacurntDriver’sLicense/ID?Ifso.gv;numberandstate.jYesENo#State(.0ITitleDateSignatHreAuSionature/fl—____I29 AdministrationTownMmlnlstratorPubliclnfonnadónAdministrativeServicesTownClerkHumanResourcesJune27,2019TOWNOFESTESPA1UJackieWilliamson.TownClerkTownofEstesParkEstesPark,CO80517RE:CS&CS LLCdbaCoffeeontheRocksScott.CarlE.Scott.CharlesK.CommunityDevelopmentBuildingSafetyCodeEnforcementPlanningizoningCommunityServicesFairgrounds&EventsMuseumSenIorCenterVisitorServicesFinanceRO.Box1747UtilityBillingPoliceRORox1287PublicWorksEngineeringFacilitiesFleetParksStreetsUtilitiesDearMs.Williamson:AcheckoftheEstesParkPoliceDepartmentlocalrecordsontheabove-namedindividualswasconducted.Therearenoreportsinvolvingtheaddresslistedwiththisbusinesswithinthepastyearandinvolvingtheindividualslistedaboveinthesystem.Sincerely.kc&WesKufeldChiefofPolice.tEstesParkPoliceDepartmentITLightandPowerWater7nJ’4ArrnrrnoA/Innon’.’,nnIrcmrc0*OWrnOnri-,InilnTnrorr1II30 To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Linda Hardin, Planner 1 Date: July 9, 2019 RE: Continuance Request for Ordinance 16-19 Amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code §5.1.B. Vacation Home to revise the deadline for (“Cap”) Number of Vacation Homes in Residential Zoning Districts Staff requests that Ordinance 16-19 Amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code §5.1.B. Vacation Home to revise the deadline for (“Cap”) Number of Vacation Homes in Residential Zoning Districts be continued to the September 24, 2019 Town Board Hearing. Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 31       32 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Linda Hardin, Planner I Date: July 9, 2019 RE: RESOLUTION 19-19 TO REAFFIRM MAXIMUM TOTAL (“CAP”) NUMBER OF VACATION HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Review a proposed text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC): • To review the current conditions with regard to the vacation home cap; • To make a determination if the cap number should be adjusted or remain at 588. Present Situation: Currently there is a cap of 588 vacation home registrations for residentially zoned properties in the Estes Valley Planning Area. The cap was reached in May 2018, and as of June 15, 2019, there are 38 applications on a wait list. We have had a total of 93 applications on the wait list over the past year, and 50 have secured their registration. There were 2 that were voided, and 3 withdrew their applications. The average wait time on the list is 148.2 days, or just under five (5) months. The wait list has 17 County applications and 21 Town applications at this time. 786 Vacation homes are registered in all zoning districts in the Estes Valley. The ratio of residential district vacation homes vs. non-residential vacation homes is currently at 79%. This is taking into consideration the cap of 588 plus the 38 applications in residential zoning districts that remain on the wait list. There are 272 vacation homes in residential zoning districts in unincorporated Larimer County, leaving the remaining 316 inside Town boundaries. The Planning Commission heard this issue at their June 18, 2019 meeting and voted unanimously with a 6-0 vote to recommend maintaining the cap at 588. 33 Proposal: To make a determination on whether an adjustment to the current cap is warranted, and to decide what that number should be if it is to be adjusted. Advantages: • An increase in the cap would increase revenues to the Town through sales tax and LMD tax; • An increase would also allow additional vacation homes to be registered and compliant with local vacation home regulations; • A decrease in the cap could in principle help to alleviate some neighbors’ concerns; • A decrease in the cap would allow more properties to be available for long-term rental or purchase by members of the workforce; Disadvantages: • A cap increase would increase the number of vacation homes in the residential zoning districts which can be viewed as detrimental to neighborhood character; • An increase would require additional staff time for registering and enforcing compliance with the additional vacation homes; • A decrease in the cap could result in a legal challenge due to “takings” case law; • An increase in the cap would reduce the number of properties potentially available for long-term rental or purchase by members of the workforce; • An increase in the cap would potentially make more properties available for investors to purchase for vacation rental use. This may drive up the prices of all homes in the valley making it potentially more difficult for members of the workforce to purchase a home. Action Recommended: Staff recommends that the Estes Park Board of Trustees leave the cap at 588, and not amend the code to adjust it. With only 38 on the wait list, and the average wait time of 5 months, our finding is that there is no need this year to increase or decrease the cap. For this reason, staff recommends Resolution 19-19 be approved, which would have the effect of leaving current code unchanged with a cap at 588. Finance/Resource Impact: None. Level of Public Interest Vacation homes in general have been an issue of high public interest. However, no public comments have been received regarding an adjustment to the cap. Sample Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. 19-19 Attachments: Resolution No. 19-19 Exhibit A – Code Amendment 34 RESOLUTION 19-19 A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING §5.1.B.1.a.(6) WHEREAS, on June 16, 2019, the Estes Valley Planning Commission conducted public hearings on proposed text amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Chapter 5 – Use Regulations; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2019, the Estes Valley Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of the text amendment, thus leaving the present vacation home cap unchanged; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park is in agreement with the Estes Valley Planning Commission in denial of the text amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: 1. Upon adoption of this Resolution and parallel adoption of a similar resolution by the Board of Larimer County Commissioners, no amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code, Chapter 5 – Use Regulations, specific to §5.1.B.1.a(6) regarding the cap number shall be adopted. DATED this _______ day of __________________, 2019. TOWN OF ESTES PARK ____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Town Clerk 35 EXHIBIT A [CHAPTER 5 – USE REGULATIONS, §5.1.B.1.a.(6)] Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees: July 9, 2019 B. Vacation Home. 1. All vacation homes shall be subject to the following: a. Annual Operating Registration. (6) Effective December 16, 2016, vacation home operating registrations in residential zoning districts (designated herein as zoning districts E, E-1, R, R- 1, R-2, RE, RE-1, and RM) shall be held at a maximum total ("cap") of 588 registrations in effect at any given time. This cap shall be reviewed annually by the Planning Commission and governing Boards, in or near the month of April beginning in or near April 2017. Applications received at any time such that their approval would cause the cap to be exceeded shall be held and kept on file in the order they are received and deemed complete by the Town Clerk's Office. Registrations held on such list shall be issued during the calendar year as operating registrations may become available. 36 To:Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through:Town Administrator Lancaster From:Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date:July 9, 2019 RE:Ordinance 17-19, Rezoning Request, Rezoning of Wildfire Homes Addition (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Conduct a public hearing and make a decision on a request to rezone property currently zoned CH-Commercial Heavy, O-Office, E-Estate, and RE-Rural Estate to O-Office, R-Single Family Residential, E-Estate, and RM-Multi-Family Residential Location Subject property is located north of US 34, south of Grey Hawk Court, west of Dry Gulch Road, along Wildfire Road in unincorporated Larimer County. The subject area is 16.082 acres in size and is located within a portion of the northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 5 North, Range 72, West of the 6th P.M. See Attachment #2. Present Situation: The subject area consists of 4 parcels consisting of residential, vacant land, and office uses. Current zoning includes CH-Commercial Heavy, O-Office, E-Estate, and RE-Rural Estate. Surrounding Area: As depicted in Attachment #2-“Vicinity Map”, the immediate surrounding area consists of two Estes Park Housing Authority projects to the north, including Vista Ridge Condominiums and The Neighborhood subdivision. To the East is Dry Gulch Road and to the West is vacant land under a conservation easement within The Reserve subdivision. To the south are single family homes on parcels zoned E-Estate, part of the Lone Pine Subdivision. Memo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 37 Proposal: The proposal entails rezoning from CH-Commercial Heavy, O-Office, E-Estate and RE-Rural Estate to O-Office, E-Estate, R-Single Family Residential, and RM-Multi-Family Residential Please refer to Exhibit A included in Attachment #3. The rezoning has been submitted with a preliminary subdivision plat, which proposes the existing parcels to be subdivided into 2 blocks with 43 total lots. 14 lots will be for detached single-family homes, 26 lots will be for townhomes, 2 lots will be for condominium projects, and 1 lot will be dedicated for an office use benefiting Crossroads Ministry. Review Criteria All applications for text or Official Zoning Map Amendments shall be reviewed by the EVPC and Board(s) for compliance with the relevant standards and criteria set forth below and with other applicable provisions of this Code. In accordance with Section 3.3D “Standards for Review” of the EVDC, all applications for rezoning shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria: 1. The amendment is necessary to address changes in conditions in the areas affected. Staff Finding: The surrounding area consists of several land uses, including multi-family condos, multi-family apartments, commercial, and estate development. What is referred to as the “North End Planning Area”, dating back 20 years to the time of adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code and subsequent zoning, has historically been a mixed use of commercial and residential uses. Despite the assigned zoning, several lots within Town limits have been zoned and developed with higher densities to meet residential and service demands. Examples nearby and/or adjacent would be Good Samaritan (2001), Vista Ridge (2002), and The Neighborhood (2005). Included in this request, one large tract (2.35 acres) proposed to be rezoned RM is currently zoned CH. This CH property immediately abuts residential development and currently allows for heavy commercial uses, such as welding and vehicle repair, that would have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhoods that have been developed in the past 15 years. The proposed RM zoning along these parcels will provide for compatible uses and eliminate future land use conflicts that the existing zoning allows. Perhaps the most significant zoning change proposed is for a portion of the existing E and O zoned area adjacent to Lone Pine Acres. The proposed RM zoning is reflective of Vista Ridge directly across the street. However, Lot 7 and a portion of Lot 6 in Lone Pine Acres will be immediately adjacent to the proposed RM zoning. The proceeding development plan will provide for extended setbacks and buffering to ensure impacts are sufficiently mitigated. 2. The development plan, which the proposed amendment to this Code would allow, is compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with the existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley. 38 Staff Finding:The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the following policies: Chapter 6 – Community Wide Policies x 5.1 Encourage a variety of housing types and price ranges. x 5.2 Encourage housing for permanent residents of all sectors of the community that is integrated into and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods. x 5.3 Establish a balanced program of incentives, and public and private actions, to provide affordable housing. x 5.6 Encourage housing infill within the existing urban area. x 5.7 Identify affordable housing opportunities on an ongoing basis. x 8.4 The Town and County will encourage redevelopment and infill as a primary tool to create a compact community and to prevent sprawl. 3. The Town, County or other relevant service providers shall have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities that might be required if the application were approved. Staff Finding:Staff finds that service providers have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities to this location. The applicant will be required to meet agency requirements at time of subdivision and development. Advantages: x Allows zoning that would provide options to establish a variety of housing for the Estes Valley. x Provides for future development of workforce housing to benefit the Estes Valley working population. Disadvantages: x Creates density on an undeveloped property. x Increased traffic in the immediate vicinity. Action Recommended: The Planning Commission voted and unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning application on June 18, 2019. Staff recommends approval with the following condition: x Approval should be contingent upon proceeding approval of the Wildfire Homes Development package including the Final Plat, Development Plans, and Condominium Maps. 39 Finance/Resource Impact: None. Level of Public Interest Medium: Public comments have been received, expressing no objection, and also pointing out “disadvantages” to the Wildfire project. The overall project is of relatively high interest for the Town of Estes Park. All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications. Sample Motions: 1. I move to approve Ordinance 17-19 to rezone the Wildfire Homes Addition to O-Office, E-Estate, R-Single Family Residential, and RM-Multi-Family Residential as depicted in Exhibit A. according to findings of fact and the following condition as recommended by Staff. a. Approval of this rezone is contingent upon approval of the Wildfire Homes development package including the Final Plat of Wildfire Homes Subdivision and Development Plans and Condominium Maps for The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums. 2. I move to deny Ordinance 17-19 to rezone the Wildfire Homes Addition to O-Office, E- Estate, R-Single Family Residential, and RM-Multi-Family Residential as depicted in Exhibit A., finding that … [state findings for denial]. 3. I move to continue Ordinance 17-19, to the next regularly scheduled meeting. (State reasons for continuance.) Attachments: 1. Ordinance 17-19 2. Vicinity Map 3. Exhibit A – Rezoning Exhibit 4. Statement of Intent 5. Rezone Justification 6. Application 40 ORDINANCE NO. 17-19 AN ORDINANCE REZONING WILDFIRE HOMES ADDITION, FROM CH- COMMERCIAL HEAVY, O-OFFICE, E-ESTATE, AND RE-RURAL ESTATE TO O- OFFICE, R-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, E-ESTATE, AND RM-MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the four existing parcels within the Wildfire Homes Addition are currently zoned CH-Commercial Heavy, O-Office, E-Estate, and RE-Rural Estate; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a subdivision of the four parcels to create 43 lots and 2 blocks, and then rezoning the platted lots to O-Office, R-Single Family Residential, E-Estate, and RM-Multi-family Residential as shown on Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended approval of the rezoning as proposed; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town that the recommended zoning change be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: The zoning of the subject site shall be consistent with the lots proposed on the Wildfire Homes Subdivision, where the platted lots shall be zoned O- Office, R-Single Family Residential, E-Estate, and RM-Multi-family Residential; and Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS _____ DAY OF _________, 2019. TOWN OF ESTES PARK _____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Town Clerk 41 I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the _____ day of ______, 2019, and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the _______ day of _________________, 2019, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Town Clerk 42 1631 1659 1739 1759 1821 1741 1740 1661 1720 1740 1730 851 1825 730 1761 1821 1820176017201660 631 651 721 731 741 1771 1765 176117411721 1660 1740 1776 1810 1820 1830 1840 1860 17201660 1719 611 17531851 1741 1747 1732 177916331655 1520 1508 1504 1500 610 1725 1760 561 1901 2000 863 1715 1629 1680 1681 1717 1817 1903 1913 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1755 1775 1795 1815 1835 1855 1875 18951735171516951675165516351615 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1775 1773 1950 RAVEN AVE HIGH PINE DR RAVEN CIR RAVEN CT NORTH RIDGE LNGRAY HAWK CTWILDFIRE RD DRYGULCHRDPTARMIGAN LN GRAY HAWK CT LONEPINEDRRED TAIL HAWK DRRED TAIL HAWK DR RAVEN CIRRAVEN C I RC R A B A P P L E LNCRABAPPLELNSOA RI NG CIR SOARING CIR P T A R M I G A N TRL PTARMIGAN TRL OLYMPIANLNOLYMPIAN LN Š‹•†”ƒˆ–†‘…—‡–™ƒ•’”‡’ƒ”‡†ˆ‘”‹–‡”ƒŽ—•‡„›–Š‡ ‘™‘ˆ•–‡•ƒ”ǡǤŠ‡‘™ƒ‡•‘…Žƒ‹ƒ•–‘ –Š‡ƒ……—”ƒ…›‘”…‘’Ž‡–‡‡••‘ˆ–Š‡†ƒ–ƒ…‘–ƒ‹‡†Š‡”‡‘Ǥ —‡ –‘ •‡…—”‹–› …‘…‡”•ǡ Š‡ ‘™ ”‡“—‡•–• –Šƒ– ›‘— †‘‘–’‘•– –Š‹• †‘…—‡–‘–Š‡ ‹–‡”‡– ‘”‘–Š‡”™‹•‡ ƒ‡ ‹– ƒ˜ƒ‹Žƒ„Ž‡ –‘ ’‡”•‘• —‘™ –‘ ›‘—Ǥ ͲͳʹͷʹͷͲ ‡‡– ͳ‹αʹ͵ͳˆ–±Town of Estes Park ‘—‹–›‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– Wildfire Homes ”‹–‡†ǣͷȀʹͻȀʹͲͳͻ ”‡ƒ–‡†›ǣ”‹––ƒ› ƒ–Šƒ™ƒ› Subject Properties 43 LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7BLOCK 7LONE PINE ACRES 1ST ADDITIONBLOCK 2THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUB.LOT 8LOT 9LOT 10LOT 11LOT 12LOT 13LOT 14LOT 15AWILDFIRE RD.LOT 1WILDFIRE SUBDIVISIONLOT 2WILDFIRESUBDIVISIONVISTA RIDGECONDOSLOT 19BLOCK 5OUTLOT F(R)LOT 3(R)LOT 4(R)LOT 5(R)LOT 6(R)LOT 7(E)LOT 8(E)LOT 9(E)LOT 10(E)OUTLOT A(E)LOT 11(E)LOT 12(E)LOT 13(R)LOT 14(R)LOT 15(R)LOT 16(R)LOT 17(RM)LOT 18(0)LOT 1(RM)LOT 02(RM)OUTLOT B(R)OUTLOT D(RM)OUTLOT EOUTLOT C(R)RM (MULTI-FAMILY)R (RESIDENTIAL)E (ESTATE)0 (OFFICE)PROPOSED ZONINGLEGENDRECHCHCHRMEOEEEE-1E-1E-1R-1RE-1RE-1RMCHRER-1E-1EOEER-2RM(;+,%,7$44 SUPPLEMENT TO WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT May 21, 2019 Applicants submit this Supplement to the Wildfire Statement of Intent for the purpose of clarifying information and explaining revisions to the pending development applications made as a result of the Staff and agency review: 1. The four Properties that make up the Wildfire Annexation are surrounding by property within the Town limits and the right-of-way for Dry Gulch Road, but are not an enclave under State statute. 2. The Townhome Subdivision for the Divide Townhomes at Wildfire is now a part of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision. The Divide Townhomes are proposed to be constructed on 26 lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H.7.c. 3. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision is accompanied by an application for vacation of approximately the west 705 feet of the existing Wildfire Road right-of-way; the right-of- way vacation is proposed to occur prior to the dedication of right-of-way for a different alignment of Wildfire Road on the Wildfire Homes Subdivision plat. 4. The Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire includes 72 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 72 units include the 42 units allowed as the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC plus 30 bonus units (or 71% of the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus for workforce housing pursuant to EVDC § 11.4.D). Because 100% of the 72 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 9 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 5. The Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire includes 16 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 16 units equal two times (or 200%) the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC as allowed pursuant to the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus provisions of EVDC § 11.4.D. Because 100% of the 16 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 2 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 6. The Development Plans for The Meadow Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums are both accompanied with applications for preliminary subdivision plats pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H. 45 2 7. A restrictive covenant for the purpose of assuring the long-term availability of the workforce housing units in The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums As required by EVDC § 10.4.E.4., will be reviewed by the Town Board with the preliminary subdivision plats for The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums. 8. Parcel C is included within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“NCWCD”) and the Municipal Subdistrict. The owners of Parcels A, B and D consent to the inclusion of their Properties into the NCWCD and, as applicable, into the Municipal Subdistrict, and such owners have executed and submitted petitions for such inclusions. The NCWCD approved the petitions on May 9, 2019. 9. A preannexation agreement has been submitted and is under review by the Town Attorney. The Wildfire Preannexation Agreement will be on the Town Board’s agenda the same night as the public hearing on the Wildfire Homes Annexation. 10. The previously requested waiver 1) has been revised in response to comments from Public Works dated April 27, 2019, to increase the turn lane redirect taper length from 160 feet to 266 feet in length. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 WILDFIRE HOMES REZONE Westover Construction, Inc. (“Westover”), Wildfire Development, LLC (“Wildfire”), RDA Associates, LLC (“RDA”) and Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. (“Crossroads”), (referred to collectively herein as the “Petitioners”) are the owners of the Properties described on the four exhibits attached hereto: Exhibit A (“Parcel A” or the “Westover Property”); Exhibit B (“Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property”); Exhibit C (“Parcel C” or the “RDA Property”); and Exhibit D (Parcel D” or the “Crossroads Property”). Petitioners have submitted a development application pursuant to §3.3.A.3 of the Estes Valley Development Code (“EVDC”), requesting changes to the zoning of the Properties and amendments to the Official Zoning Map to reflect such rezonings. The current zoning of each of the Properties in set forth on Exhibits A through D, and the current and proposed zoning of the Properties is depicted on the Rezoning Map submitted herewith. The zoning requested for the Properties is a combination of O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), R Single Family Residential (“R”), and RM Multi-Family Residential (“RM”). COMPLIANCE WITH REZONE CRITERIA In support of this rezoning application, Petitioners assert that the Wildfire Homes Rezone complies with the standards and criteria set forth in EVDC §3.3.D.1 through 3, as set forth below. 1. Changed conditions in the area will be addressed by the rezoning; The Properties are located west of Dry Gulch Road in the North End Planning Area of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan (the “Comp Plan”). At the time of the adoption of the Comp Plan and the Official Zoning Map in November 1999 (20 years ago), the Properties were located outside of the Estes Park town limits and zoned a combination of O Office, E Estate, RE Rural Estate and CO Commercial Outlying. Existing land use in the North End Planning Area was described in the 1999 Comp Plan as primarily large-lot, single-family residential, 1 acre to over 40 acres, with a majority of the land in the County being undeveloped, but with pockets of small lots with cabins. A review of the 1999 Official Zoning Map indicates that north and east of the Properties, in the County, were undeveloped properties or large lot (10 acre minimum) residential properties zoned Rural Estate (“RE-1”). Adjacent to the 56 2 Properties on the south was an Estate (“E”) zoned neighborhood (1/2 acre minimum) called Lone Pine Acres which had been annexed to Estes Park and subdivided in the 1960’s. To the west of the Properties was undeveloped land in the Estate (“E-1”) zone (1 acre minimum), and to the southwest was the very recently approved (August 1999) Ranch Meadows Condominiums in the RM zone. Future land use in the North End Planning Area, as described in the 1999 Comp Plan, was expected to “generally consist of low-density residential classifications and parks, recreation and open space,” however, a look at approved developments in the North End Planning Area since 1999 reveals a significant amount of change that has resulted in a very different density and character: A. Good Samaritan In 2001, the Town approved the approximately 65-acre Good Samaritan First and Second Additions to the Town and Good Samaritan Subdivision; the annexation and subdivision are located north of the Properties. On the north and west edges of the Good Samaritan Subdivision, there are eight 2-acre single family lots in the E-1 zone next to existing, large-lot County development, however, the remainder of the Good Samaritan property was zoned RM and developed as a church and three separate housing projects: (i) In 2003, the Estes Park Housing Authority (“EPHA”) developed the 44-unit Talons Pointe Apartments on approximately 3.75 acres. Density of the Talons Pointe Apartments is approximately 11.7 dwelling units per acre. (ii) In 2016, the EPHA developed the 45-unit Falcon Ridge Apartments and Townhomes on approximately 5.5 acres. Density of the Falcon Ridge Apartments and Townhomes is approximately 8 dwelling units per acre. (iii) The Good Samaritan Society – Estes Park Village consists of 46 twin homes, a 34-unit senior apartment complex and a 24-bed assisted living center on approximately 18 acres. B. Vista Ridge The Dry Gulch Road & Wildfire Ridge Annexation, abutting Parcel C and Parcel D, was approved in 1998. Later in 2002, the Town approved the approximately 6.2- acre Vista Ridge Subdivision in the Wildfire Ridge Annexation. Over the next five years (2003 to 2007), the EPHA developed, in eight separate phases, a mixed income home ownership condominium community consisting of 59 units. Density of the Vista Ridge Condominiums is approximately 9.5 units per gross acre, and approximately 11.3 units per net acre. 57 3 C. Bosan Addition and The Neighborhood Annexation of 9.9-acre Bosan Addition in 2005, immediately north of and adjacent to Parcel A and Parcel B, completed the annexation of all properties that surround the Properties. The Boson Addition was subdivided as The Neighborhood later in 2005; The Neighborhood subdivision includes small residential lots (.167 to .256 acres) and two larger tracts near Dry Gulch Road which were replatted and developed as the Salud Family Health Center in 2017. In conclusion, the North End Planning Area has undergone significant change over the last 20 years. The Properties, once on the very edge of the Town, are surrounded by residential uses of various types and densities within the Town limits. 2. The rezoning will allow for uses that are compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley. The requested rezoning to allow for a combination of single-family homes, townhomes and workforce housing condominiums is consistent with the pattern of development in the North End Planning Area of the Estes Valley, where the Town limits have expanded over the last 20 years to accommodate development of a variety of housing options for seniors, families and workforce housing. The rezoning is supported by the following Community Wide Policies of the 1999 Comprehensive Plan: 5.1 Encourage a variety of housing types and price ranges. 5.2 Encourage housing for . . . all sectors of the community . . . 5.3 Establish . . . incentives . . . to provide affordable housing. 5.6 Encourage housing infill . . . 5.7 Identify affordable housing opportunities . . . 8.4 . . . encourage . . . infill as a primary tool to create a compact community . . . More recently, a consistent theme in the 2015 Estes Valley Economic Development Strategy is the need to increase the supply of workforce housing in the Estes Valley: “Housing is expensive and there are few options available for purchase or rent, . . . presenting “a serious threat to the ability of businesses to attract and retain qualified employees.” “The loss of younger, working-age residents is a major concern . . . because they represent an important employee base that allows for the provision of high-quality services in the Estes Valley, including the medical center, police force, city services, park maintenance, and much more.” 58 4 The 2018 National Citizen Survey about the “livability” of Estes Park reports that, “Residents gave the lowest marks to the availability of affordable quality housing, housing options and cost of living . . .” when rating aspect of community quality. Echoing that same theme, the October 2018 draft list of Recommended Contents for the upcoming update to the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan continues to include this community value: improve work force housing opportunities. Furthermore, the Town of Estes Park 2019 Strategic Plan has identified “housing available for all segments in our community” as one of the Town’s Key Outcome Areas. 3. The Town, County or other relevant service providers shall have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities that might be required if the application were approved. As detailed in the Statement of Intent, all relevant service providers have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities to the Properties. 59 5 Exhibit A to Wildfire Homes Rezone narrative Description of “Parcel A” or the “Westover Property” owned by Petitioner, Westover Construction, Inc. Current zoning: RE Rural Estate Zoning District Address: 1851 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-016 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP WITH ALL BEARING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.56 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 20 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 60 6 Exhibit B to Wildfire Homes Rezone narrative Description of “Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property” owned by Petitioner, Wildfire Development, LLC Current zoning: CH Heavy Commercial Zoning District Address: 1753 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-015 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 343.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE IN THE DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114, ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 2, HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 61 7 Exhibit C to Wildfire Homes Rezone narrative Description of “Parcel C” or “RDA Property” owned by Petitioner, RDA Associates, LLC Current zoning: E Rural Estate Zoning District Address: vacant property Parcel Number: 25200-00-007 Legal Description: A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE W1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, MONUMENTED BY A BRASS CAPPED PIPE WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NW1/4 OF SECTION 20 CONSIDERED AS BEARING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 1506.46 FEET TO A BRASS CAPPED PIPE; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST 236.97 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 163.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT 225.13 FEET, SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 26 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 430.10 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST 222.57 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 288.62 FEET SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 13 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 973.48 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 81 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 287.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST 666.81 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 326.57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 62 8 Exhibit D to Wildfire Homes Rezone narrative Description of “Parcel D” or “Crossroads Property” owned by Petitioner, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Current zoning: O Office Zoning District Address: 851 Dry Gulch Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-910 Legal Description: A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 20 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 1506.3 FEET, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 26 MINUTES EAST 395.8 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES EAST 161 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 46 MINUTES WEST 377 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 274.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1983 IN BOOK 2239 AT PAGE 1089 AND SHOWN IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 22, 1986 AS RECEPTION NO. 86020283. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. 63 64 65 66 67       68 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTMemo To:Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through:Town Administrator Lancaster From:Jeffrey Woeber, Senior Planner Date:July 9, 2019 RE:Preliminary Plat – Wildfire Homes Subdivision (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Conduct a public hearing and make a decision on a Preliminary Subdivision Plat request to subdivide four parcels into 2 blocks with 43 lots. Present Situation: Currently, the subject 16.082 acres consists of 4 separate parcels. Existing improvements (Westover Construction) on parcel addressed 1753 Wildfire will remain and will be placed on its own lot to serve Crossroads Ministry. The existing structure addressed 1851 Wildfire Road and the Crossroads Ministry building addressed 851 Dry Gulch Road will be demolished to make room for proposed development. The remaining acreage is currently vacant. Proposal: This proposal entails a preliminary plat to subdivide 4 parcels into 2 blocks with 43 total lots. 14 lots will be for detached single-family homes, 26 lots will be for townhomes, 2 lots will be for condominium projects, and 1 lot will be dedicated for an office use benefiting Crossroads Ministry. Also included are 10 outlots dedicated for open space, utilities, access, and drainage. The 14 detached single-family lots will range in size from .210 acres for those zoned R- Residential to .432 acres for those lots zoned E-Estate. Reduction in minimum lot sizes for single-family subdivisions is permitted within EVDC §4.3.D (Table 4-3) with the provision of at least 15% dedicated private open space. The proposal meets this requirement. Additionally, 26 individual townhome lots are proposed. The townhome lots are located in the center of the subdivision to allow for buffering by the single family lots on the 69 perimeter. The application proposes townhome lots ranging in size from .056 acres to .07 acres (2,439.36 - 3,049.2 square feet). Pursuant to EVDC §10.5.H.7, individual townhome units may be constructed on a smaller lot, subject to approval by the Decision Making Body. As the minimum lot size for the RM zoning district is 5,400 square feet, the Town Board may approve smaller lot sizes as proposed. The proposed townhome lots and building envelopes adhere to all dimensional and density standards as required by Code. Lot 17 is proposed to utilize the existing Westover Construction office building to benefit Crossroads Ministry. The current improvements and proposed lot dimensions meet lot standards imposed by the O-Office zoning district. The 2 remaining lots, Lot 1 and Lot 16 are proposed to house multi-family condominium developments. Lot 1 is proposed to contain a 72-unit workforce condominium development and Lot 16 is proposed to contain a 16-unit workforce condominium development. These development plans have been provided for review and may be found on the Town website under “Current Applications”. A waiver is requested to permit a shared driveway to access up to 5 single-family units (Lots 2-6). While the EVDC encourages shared driveways, Appendix D restricts service to no more than 4 single-family units. Review Process: EVDC §3.9.E. All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, “Subdivision Standards,” and all other applicable provisions of Code. Review Criteria: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. 1.Buildings and Lots.Existing improvements will conform to applicable density and dimensional standards of newly created lots. Proposed lots and outlots conform to zoning standards and applicable subdivision standards set forth in the EVDC. The proposed townhome lot sizes must be approved by the Decision Making Body pursuant to EVDC §10.5. 2.Water.Water is available to serve the development and all Town and District requirements have been met. Participation in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal Subdistrict is required. The District has approved the applicant’s petition for inclusion on May 9, 2019. 3.Fire Protection. Emergency access routes have been provided with this preliminary plat to meet Fire District standards. The Estes Valley Fire District has no objections. 70 4.Electric.All new electric will be installed underground per EVDC §10.5 and appropriate utility easements are proposed. The Estes Park Power and Communications Division has no objections to this proposal. 5.Sanitary Sewer.Sanitary sewer is to be provided by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. All district requirements have been met with this proposal. 6.Stormwater Drainage.Drainage facilities and related easements are proposed with this subdivision. Public Works has no objection. 7.Access.Adequate and safe access is provided with this proposal. Public works has no objection to the road infrastructure as presented. A waiver request is included to allow up to 5 single-family units to access via a shared driveway. 8.Sidewalk/Trail.An 8’ multi-modal trail is proposed with this subdivision to link with the existing trail along the west side of Dry Gulch Road. 9.Parking.Parking requirements set forth in EVDC §7.11 have been met with this application. 10.Comprehensive Plan. This project conforms to goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically as follows: x 5.1 – Encourage a variety of housing types and pricing. x 5.2 – Encourage housing for permanent residents of all sectors of the community that is integrated and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods. x 5.5 – Provide for mixed-use developments which integrate commercial, housing, employment, and service needs. x 5.7 – Identify affordable housing opportunities on an ongoing basis. x 5.9 – Support the creation of public and private funding sources for affordable housing. x 5.10 – Establish a linkage between new development and the provision of affordable housing. x 8.4 The Town and County will encourage redevelopment and infill as a primary tool to create a compact community and to prevent sprawl. Advantages: x Allows for a subdivision consistent with the Estes Valley Development Code. x Provides additional housing for permanent residents of the community in a variety of housing options. x Provides for much needed workforce housing to benefit residents of the Estes Valley. Disadvantages: x Increase in traffic in the immediate area. 71 Action Recommended: The Estes Valley Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the Town Board approve the Preliminary Plat of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision on June 18, 2019. Finance/Resource Impact: None Level of Public Interest Medium: Public comments have been received, expressing no objection, and also pointing out “disadvantages” to the Wildfire project. The overall project is of relatively high interest for the Town of Estes Park. All written comments are posted to www.estes.org/currentapplications. Sample Motion: I move for the approval/denial of the Preliminary Plat of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision as presented. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Vicinity Map 3. Statement of Intent 4. Preliminary Plat 72 73 74 75 76 1631 1659 1739 1759 1821 1741 1740 1661 1720 1740 1730 851 1825 730 1761 1821 1820176017201660 631 651 721 731 741 1771 1765 176117411721 1660 1740 1776 1810 1820 1830 1840 1860 17201660 1719 611 17531851 1741 1747 1732 177916331655 1520 1508 1504 1500 610 1725 1760 561 1901 2000 863 1715 1629 1680 1681 1717 1817 1903 1913 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1755 1775 1795 1815 1835 1855 1875 18951735171516951675165516351615 1620 1640 1660 1680 1700 1720 1740 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1775 1773 1950 RAVEN AVE HIGH PINE DR RAVEN CIR RAVEN CT NORTH RIDGE LNGRAY HAWK CTWILDFIRE RD DRYGULCHRDPTARMIGAN LN GRAY HAWK CT LONEPINEDRRED TAIL HAWK DRRED TAIL HAWK DR RAVEN CIRRAVEN C I RC R A B A P P L E LNCRABAPPLELNSOA RI NG CIR SOARING CIR P T A R M I G A N TRL PTARMIGAN TRL OLYMPIANLNOLYMPIAN LN Š‹•†”ƒˆ–†‘…—‡–™ƒ•’”‡’ƒ”‡†ˆ‘”‹–‡”ƒŽ—•‡„›–Š‡ ‘™‘ˆ•–‡•ƒ”ǡǤŠ‡‘™ƒ‡•‘…Žƒ‹ƒ•–‘ –Š‡ƒ……—”ƒ…›‘”…‘’Ž‡–‡‡••‘ˆ–Š‡†ƒ–ƒ…‘–ƒ‹‡†Š‡”‡‘Ǥ —‡ –‘ •‡…—”‹–› …‘…‡”•ǡ Š‡ ‘™ ”‡“—‡•–• –Šƒ– ›‘— †‘‘–’‘•– –Š‹• †‘…—‡–‘–Š‡ ‹–‡”‡– ‘”‘–Š‡”™‹•‡ ƒ‡ ‹– ƒ˜ƒ‹Žƒ„Ž‡ –‘ ’‡”•‘• —‘™ –‘ ›‘—Ǥ ͲͳʹͷʹͷͲ ‡‡– ͳ‹αʹ͵ͳˆ–±Town of Estes Park ‘—‹–›‡˜‡Ž‘’‡– Wildfire Homes ”‹–‡†ǣͷȀʹͻȀʹͲͳͻ ”‡ƒ–‡†›ǣ”‹––ƒ› ƒ–Šƒ™ƒ› Subject Properties 77 SUPPLEMENT TO WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT May 21, 2019 Applicants submit this Supplement to the Wildfire Statement of Intent for the purpose of clarifying information and explaining revisions to the pending development applications made as a result of the Staff and agency review: 1. The four Properties that make up the Wildfire Annexation are surrounding by property within the Town limits and the right-of-way for Dry Gulch Road, but are not an enclave under State statute. 2. The Townhome Subdivision for the Divide Townhomes at Wildfire is now a part of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision. The Divide Townhomes are proposed to be constructed on 26 lots that are smaller than the minimum lot size pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H.7.c. 3. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision is accompanied by an application for vacation of approximately the west 705 feet of the existing Wildfire Road right-of-way; the right-of- way vacation is proposed to occur prior to the dedication of right-of-way for a different alignment of Wildfire Road on the Wildfire Homes Subdivision plat. 4. The Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire includes 72 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 72 units include the 42 units allowed as the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC plus 30 bonus units (or 71% of the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus for workforce housing pursuant to EVDC § 11.4.D). Because 100% of the 72 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 9 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 5. The Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire includes 16 multi-family units of workforce housing; the 16 units equal two times (or 200%) the Maximum Base Net Density in Table 4-2 of the EVDC as allowed pursuant to the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus provisions of EVDC § 11.4.D. Because 100% of the 16 multi-family units will be restricted to workforce housing, the 2 buildings will be 38 feet tall pursuant to the maximum building height allowed for workforce housing in the RM Zone District in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. 6. The Development Plans for The Meadow Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums are both accompanied with applications for preliminary subdivision plats pursuant to EVDC § 10.5.H. 78 2 7. A restrictive covenant for the purpose of assuring the long-term availability of the workforce housing units in The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums As required by EVDC § 10.4.E.4., will be reviewed by the Town Board with the preliminary subdivision plats for The Meadows Condominiums and The Divide Condominiums. 8. Parcel C is included within the boundaries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (“NCWCD”) and the Municipal Subdistrict. The owners of Parcels A, B and D consent to the inclusion of their Properties into the NCWCD and, as applicable, into the Municipal Subdistrict, and such owners have executed and submitted petitions for such inclusions. The NCWCD approved the petitions on May 9, 2019. 9. A preannexation agreement has been submitted and is under review by the Town Attorney. The Wildfire Preannexation Agreement will be on the Town Board’s agenda the same night as the public hearing on the Wildfire Homes Annexation. 10. The previously requested waiver 1) has been revised in response to comments from Public Works dated April 27, 2019, to increase the turn lane redirect taper length from 160 feet to 266 feet in length. 79 WILDFIRE STATEMENT OF INTENT For Submittal on 4-18-19 BACKGROUND Westover Construction, Inc. (“Westover”), Wildfire Development, LLC (“Wildfire”), RDA Associates, LLC (“RDA”) and Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. (“Crossroads”), (referred to collectively herein as the “Petitioners”) are the owners of the Properties described on the four exhibits attached hereto: Exhibit A (“Parcel A” or the “Westover Property”); Exhibit B (“Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property”); Exhibit C (“Parcel C” or the “RDA Property”); and Exhibit D (“Parcel D” or the “Crossroads Property”). The Properties are located in the northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., lying west of Dry Gulch Road, about ½ mile north of US 34 in the North End Planning Area of the Estes Valley. Although once on the very edge of the Town, the Properties are surrounded by residential uses of various types and densities within the Town limits. South of the Properties is an Estate (“E”) zoned neighborhood (1/2 acre minimum) called Lone Pine Acres which was annexed to Estes Park and developed in the 1960’s. To the southwest is the Ranch Meadows Condominiums in the RM Multi-Family Residential zone district (“RM”) of the Town, and to the west is the Reserve in the E-1 Estate (“E-1”) zone. North of the Properties is Vista Ridge, an approximately 6-acre Estes Park Housing Authority project of 59 affordable and market rate condominiums, and The Neighborhood, an approximately 10-acre subdivision that includes small single-family lots and the Salud Family Health Center on Dry Gulch Road. Just north of The Neighborhood are the Talons Pointe Apartments and the Falcon Ridge Apartments and Townhomes, both of which are also Estes Park Housing Authority affordable housing projects with a combined 89 units, and the Good Samaritan Society – Estes Park Village, a senior community with 46 paired homes, a 34-unit apartment complex and a 24-bed assisted living center. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Petitioners desire to annex the Properties to the Town, and then rezone and subdivide it for the development of a variety of single family homes, townhomes and condominiums to provide additional housing options in the Estes Valley in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, the applications submitted are as follows: 1. Wildfire Homes Annexation of all four of the Properties, a total of 16.802 acres. 80 2 2. Wildfire Homes Rezone from the current zonings of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), RE Rural Estate (“RE”) and CH Heavy Commercial (“CH”), to a combination of: O Office (“O”), E Estate (“E”), R Single Family Residential (“R”), and RM Multi-Family Residential (“RM”). 3. Wildfire Homes Subdivision is proposed to include 14 single family lots (six ½- acre lots in the E zone, eight ¼-acre lots in the R zone), a townhome project (The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire which is noted as Block 2 of this subdivision), two lots for workforce housing condominium projects (The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire and the Divide Condominiums at Wildfire), 6 outlots for drainage and other purposes, and one lot in the O zone for the relocation of Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. The existing commercial construction operation now located on Parcel B will be relocated to a location outside of the Properties. 4. Development Plan for The Meadow Condominiums at Wildfire (9 buildings, 8 units/building) on Lot 1 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units. 5. Development Plan for The Divide Condominiums at Wildfire (2 buildings, 8 units/building) on Lot 16 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units.. 6. Townhome Subdivision for The Divide Townhomes at Wildfire a subdivision of Block 2 of the Wildfire Homes Subdivision into 26 townhome lots meeting the current EVDC definition of Workforce Housing Units Petitioners believe that the housing they intend to provide is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and needed to help provide additional housing options for the residents of the Estes Valley. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The units shall be eligible for the Maximum Permitted Density Bonus (Sec. 11.4.D) if at least one (1) resident in each housing unit annually submits an affidavit, including a copy of a W-2 form, to the Town certifying that the resident is employed within the Estes Park School District R-3 Boundary Map). The Wildfire project is a 128-Unit development of approximately 16 acres. The Wildfire Homes Subdivision will create six Outlots (A,B,C,D,E and F) to provide transitions between internal density and zoning changes. The total acreage of these Outlots is approximately 1.06 acres. Annexation of the Properties is also proposed. Currently, the limits of the Town of Estes Park surround the Properties and the perimeter of the Wildfire Homes Annexation as proposed is 4611 feet long. Right-of-Ways are proposed as necessary on both Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road for dedication of access to the proposed development. At 81 3 this time, there is no additional right of way width proposed on Wildfire Road, nor Dry Gulch Road (although it appears that the recently constructed sidewalk along the west side of Dry Gulch Road may be within the subject property limits). Additional right of way may be pursued on Dry Gulch Road with the design of the north bound left turn lane that has been determined to not be required (by LCUASS Standards), but is proposed to be constructed for safety. Utility Easements are also dedicated for the current utility needs as well as future needs associated with the buildout of this plan. At buildout, the housing units in this development will be sold individually and used as single family housing. HOA(s) are being formed and Covenants also formed for the proposed use and care of the common spaces and improvements. The right of way for Wildfire Road and the internal looping road will be dedicated to the Town for maintenance. ACCESS: Currently the southern 9 acre lot (Parcel C) is vacant and has no internal roads. Parcel C is adjacent to the Wildfire Road right of way for access as well as adjacent to the internal road in Lone Pine Subdivision (North Ridge Lane). No daily access to North Ridge Lane is proposed and only emergency access is proposed there. Emergency access is also proposed at the southeast corner of the internal loop road. All lots that are proposed have frontage on a public street or front on a private access easement (Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5). Outlot B on the west side of the loop road is also for access that would (in the future) possibly connect to properties to the west in the Reserve Subdivision. This area adjacent to the west side of the Wildfire Homes Development is in a Conservation Easement that does not allow roads; therefore, no physical road is proposed. The ground there is relatively flat and can be accessed in an absolute emergency. The Traffic Impact Study (attached with this submittal) has shown that there is not a requirement for the left turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road. This development has planned for that and it is indicated as proposed for construction with this submittal. A preliminary design for that improvement is also included herein. It is a somewhat complicated improvement given the alignment of the current road, the large storm sewer catch basin in the southwest quadrant, and the steep (retaining wall) slope to the east with the floodplain of Dry Gulch Creek nearby. Additional right of way is not felt absolutely necessary, but would be helpful to decrease the cost of that possible improvement. A Traffic Memo has been submitted and the formal Traffic Impact Study is also now included. Fire truck access is adequate for the appropriate wheel base truck length and is shown specifically on the attached development sheets. The steepest new internal main road profile grade is less than an 11% slope which meets the EVDC. As mentioned above, emergency access loops are also proposed to mitigate the possible long cul-de-sac concern. Pedestrian access is provided with a looping sidewalk paralleling both sides of the internal looping road as well as a detached sidewalk generally following the south side of Wildfire Road leading to the large sidewalk on the west side of Dry Gulch Road. Bicycle traffic is expected to share the road system in this subdivision as no individual bicycle lanes are proposed. 82 4 OPEN SPACE: This project includes six Outlots and other areas of open space as shown on the attached designs. There are no outstanding or noticeable specific features on this site (like wetlands, or rock outcrops, or significant trees). UTILITIES: This property is currently adjacent to all the main utilities. The main lines will be tied into and extended for use by the proposed condominiums, Townhomes and single family lots. ELECTRIC: Contact has been made with the Town of Estes Park Light & Power Department as well as an Electric Engineer. The current plan is to come off of the existing three phase power along the west line with drops to transformers to serve the western portions of this subdivision. All proposed electric lines will be buried. The same plan is true for the southern line which is a secondary line. Transformers are shown on the electric utility plan to serve the units along the southern side of the development with all buried lines. There has been some preliminary discussion about burying the lines along the south side of the subdivision (with help from the southern adjoining lot owners in Lone Pine Subdivision). The poles and service lines along the south line are on or near the Lone Pine lots. Should a new buried power line be completed, agreements with southern lot owners would be needed to re-connect their service lines. A 20’ Utility and Drainage Easement is proposed along this south line within the Wildfire Homes Subdivision for this utility improvement if an agreement comes together. If an agreement cannot be made, then the plan as outlined above will move forward. WATER: A water main exists to the north of this development within the Neighborhood Subdivision and the new main lines through this development will connect to that water main (proposed here between Lots 15 and 16). This subdivision will include a looping water main running west to east to connect to the existing main in Wildfire Road east of the circle road. This connection will help to balance pressures in this area of Town. SEWER: Upper Thompson Sanitation District controls the sewer lines in this area of Estes Park and gravity flow main lines are proposed in easily accessible locations to serve the future units and connect to the existing sewer main line in Wildfire Road east of the circle road. PARKING: The EVDC parking quantities are proposed or exceeded with this development. Internal parking is provided on the ground floor of the 8-plexes (8 in each building), and additional outside parking is also proposed. Code required parking for the proposed multi-family and townhome units collectively is 239 spaces, while 251 spaces are being provided. The Crossroads land use currently has 22 spaces and operates acceptably. The proposed Crossroads site is planned to have 25 spaces. 83 5 STORMWATER: Given that this property is close to a river (Dry Gulch Creek), and there are established roadside ditches along Wildfire Road, the main drainage changes are higher on the lot in the area where stormwater features are not currently present. A Preliminary Drainage Report meeting the requirements of the Larimer County Stormwater Management Manual is included with this submittal. Also, two relatively large detention ponds (with outlet structures) are proposed to the north and south of the proposed looping road. These detention ponds provide open space for the development and also hold back the difference between historic runoff and the increased runoff from the increased hard surfacing associated with this proposal. The ponds are provided with relatively shallow side slopes in at least one direction for animal and public safety. The net result downstream is that no increase in flow (Cubic Feet per Second) is proposed to Dry Gulch Creek. Of course, disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to promote grass growth and to minimize erosion and look aesthetically pleasing. SCHEDULE: One general phase is proposed for buildout. A consecutive approach is planned for construction. The current plan is to work from higher density (Townhomes) to the Condominium units, and then single family lots. The units are planned to be built simultaneously or consecutively without any delay following the over-lot grading, and installation of roads and utility main lines. CODE WAIVERS: All of the appropriate Utility District, EVDC and other standards for development (requirements) are met with this submittal except for the following three (3) items: 1) Redirect Taper length for north portion of the turn lane at Dry Gulch Road and Wildfire Road. As mentioned above, this turn lane is not required by the cited standard, but is proposed by the developers for safety of the future residence. The taper and striping lengths for this proposed improvement equal or exceed the similar left turn lane recently constructed just 500’ north of the proposed left turn lane. 2) Appendix D.lll.B.6 where shared single family driveways may be shared by up to four units. Lots 2-6 are proposed to share the driveway in the access easement proposed. Lot 6 could access from Divide Circle, however not as safe as accessing on the private driveway. 3) Multi-modal path detached and located on the south side of Wildfire Road. This concrete walk is proposed at 8’ wide. Federal Standards (AASHTO) suggests a 10’ width. Reasoning for this waiver is limited right of way (some of the sidewalk area is proposed in easements), site disturbance is limited with a smaller path (keeping the roadside ditches along Wildfire Road), the uncommon (non-existing) occurrence in Estes Park of a multi-modal path in a residential subdivision, and most importantly, this proposed 8’ path connects to the existing ‘downstream’ 84 6 path along the west side of Dry Gulch Road (recently constructed trail system connection to the Town). 85 7 Exhibit A to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel A” or the “Westover Property” owned by Petitioner, Westover Construction, Inc. Current zoning: RE Rural Estate Zoning District Address: 1851 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-016 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP WITH ALL BEARING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.56 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 20 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 86 8 Exhibit B to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel B” or the “Wildfire Property” owned by Petitioner, Wildfire Development, LLC Current zoning: CH Heavy Commercial Zoning District Address: 1753 Wildfire Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-015 Legal Description: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS PRESENTLY MONUMENTED BY A G.L.O. BRASS CAP, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20, CONSIDERED AS BEARING NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 326.64 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 362.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 343.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 335.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE IN THE DEED OF DEDICATION RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1978 IN BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114, ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 2, HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 87 9 Exhibit C to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel C” or “RDA Property” owned by Petitioner, RDA Associates, LLC Current zoning: E Rural Estate Zoning District Address: vacant property Parcel Number: 25200-00-007 Legal Description: A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE W1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, MONUMENTED BY A BRASS CAPPED PIPE WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NW1/4 OF SECTION 20 CONSIDERED AS BEARING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 1506.46 FEET TO A BRASS CAPPED PIPE; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST 236.97 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 163.92 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT 225.13 FEET, SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 26 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 430.10 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST 222.57 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 250.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 288.62 FEET SAID CURVE HAS A DELTA ANGLE OF 16 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 13 SECONDS A RADIUS OF 973.48 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING NORTH 81 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 287.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST 666.81 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILDFIRE LANE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 326.57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 88 10 Exhibit D to Statement of Intent Description of “Parcel D” or “Crossroads Property” owned by Petitioner, Crossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Current zoning: O Office Zoning District Address: 851 Dry Gulch Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 Parcel Number: 25200-00-910 Legal Description: A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 20 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 1506.3 FEET, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 26 MINUTES EAST 395.8 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES EAST 161 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 46 MINUTES WEST 377 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST 274.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1983 IN BOOK 2239 AT PAGE 1089 AND SHOWN IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 22, 1986 AS RECEPTION NO. 86020283. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. 89 CHCHRMEEEE-1E-1E-1R-1RE-1RE-1RMCHRER-1E-1EOEEEEEE90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99       100 Estes Park Housing Authority May 13, 2019 Town of Estes Park Attn: Town Administrator PC BOX 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Lancaster, Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) is encountering something we have never had to face since our inception: because of the growing need for additional Town personnel, we have been asked to relocate our offices out of Town owned property. As a result, what has been provided for us over the years at no cost, which includes office space, utilities, and phone and internet services, will hence forward become expenditures not previously anticipated or allocated within our current operating budget. As a result, we are finding ourselves seeking additional funding for the current year to help offset these costs associated with the move. EPHA plans to vacate this summer and our goal is to return the currently occupied space to the Town of Estes Park prior to our Memorandum of Understanding expiration of August 20^^ of this year. The space we have selected is 363 E Elkhorn Avenue Suite 101, on the main floor of the US Bank building. There are a number of costs associated with the move and we are requesting financial support from the Town of Estes Park to provide relief from this financial burden. In addition to the required security deposit of $1,782 and the monthly rent of $1,680 for the remainder of 2019, EPHA is faced with the following costs to re-establish our work in a new location. Estes Park Housing Authority is requesting a one-time contribution from the Town of Estes Park to assist with these relocation costs. Security Deposit $1,782 Rent (July-Dec 2019)$10,080 Telephones $700 Telephone Service (July-Dec 2019)$1,200 Internet Service (July-Dec 2019)$1,000 Color Copier/Fax/Scan machine and shredding machine $600 Mover $1,000 Permits (for changes to office space)Unknown Advertising (new location and phone numbers)$1,000 Break room needs (microwave, coffee maker, refrigerator)$600 Partitions / Furniture $22,000 Build 1 wall, recess 3 electrical monuments, bring data/internet to the site $6,000 Flooring $4,000 Clean/Paint $1,000 1 I P a g e 101 Miscellaneous cost (insurance coverage changes)$500 ESTIMATED RELOCATION COSTS $51,462 These costs are those immediate needs associated with completing the relocation. Moving forward, EPHA will experience a monthly rental cost totaling nearly $21,000 annually, in addition to phone and data services. As an agency that operates within minimal margins, we will be challenged to find revenue to compensate for these additional expenditures. EPHA will be asking for additional support from the Town of Estes Park for fiscal year 2020 to help offset these additional costs. The Town of Estes Park created the Housing Authority and through the years has provided us with not only office space, but financial support. What once was annual funding of more than $260,000 EPHA has decreased its annual request to $26,000 in 2019. The Town has provided financial contributions to housing assessments and housing purchases to provide for our community's housing needs. EPHA manages 187 rental units, 29 affordable for-purchase units, home ownership programs and not only are we an advocate to others developing housing in our community, we continue to work on bringing more housing units for another segment of our community, the workforce. Our mission and the Town's mission is aligned and we both champion the goal to be an exceptionally vibrant, diverse, inclusive and active mountain community in which to live, work and play with housing avaiiable for ali segments in our community. It is my belief that no matter the location of Estes Park Housing Authority, we will continue to strive to decrease our funding request to zero. While that may not be as close at hand as we once thought, I do believe it will be our reality one day. At this time, I ask for your thoughtful consideration of this funding request to assist with our immediate needs. The Estes Park Housing Board of Commissioners and I are available to meet with you and/or Town Board of Trustees to answer questions or provide further detail. Respectfully submitted. Naomi M. Hawf Executive Director Estes Park Housing Authority 102 PUBLIC WORKS Memo To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: David Hook, Engineering Manager Greg Muhonen, Public Works Director Date: July 9, 2019 RE: Resolution #20-19 to adopt the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: Approve a resolution to adopt the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan. Present Situation: The Town of Estes Park was a successful applicant for grant funds to complete a stormwater master plan. Funds were awarded from the Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG- DR) through the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA). This was an effort for the State to help communities address risks following the 2013 Flood. The grant application was submitted November 2015 and the award was executed August 2016. In September 2016, Town selected a consultant to complete the stormwater master plan following a competitive request for proposals. The final plan was delivered to the Town in May 2018. This plan is proposed for the Estes Valley Development Code area. The Town collaborated with Larimer County on a separate companion proposal to establish a stormwater utility. The proposed stormwater utility is on hold as requested by the Town Board of Trustees and the Board of County Commissioners. Proposal: Public Works staff proposes the Town Board of Trustees adopt the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan. Advantages: • Adoption of the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan will strengthen future grant applications related to stormwater management, including the federal Department of Transportation’s BUILD grant for the Big Thompson River Bridge, Channel, and Trail Improvements Project. 103 •Adoption indicates the Board’s support for a more resilient community, and demonstrates follow-through on the Town’s desire to improve stormwater management as represented in the grant application for the master plan. •Adoption can occur separately from the proposal to establish a stormwater utility as the primary organizational structure to fund and implement stormwater improvements. •Adoption does not mandate stormwater management standards or capital improvements; rather, it functions as guide to assist in identifying and prioritizing effective stormwater management activities the Town can undertake to protect private and public infrastructure from future flood and stormwater runoff damage. Disadvantages: Adoption of a stormwater master plan implies a Town government intent to future funding and construction of the infrastructure improvements recommended in the plan. These projects will compete with other community needs for the limited public funds available. Action Recommended: Public W orks staff recommends approval of the attached resolution to adopt the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan on July 9, 2019 prior the DOT BUILD grant application deadline of July 15, 2019. Finance/Resource Impact: The adoption of the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan does not require financial support. Matching funds for grant applications will be considered separately on a case- by-case basis. Level of Public Interest The level of public interest is low. Sample Motion: I move for the approval/denial to adopt the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan. Attachments: Resolution 20-19 Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan Link 104 RESOLUTION NO. 20-19 STORMWATER MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park (“Town”) completed a stormwater master plan in 2018 with funds from the Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (“CDBG-DR) through the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (“DOLA”) received following the 2013 Flood; and WHEREAS, the Town staff presented the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan to the Town Board of Trustees which includes Study Area Description, Hydrological Analysis, Hydraulic Evaluation and Identification of Flood Hazards, Recommended Plan, Conceptual Design, and Additional Recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Town and the surrounding Estes Valley are at risk of flooding and the stormwater infrastructure is deficient in adequately conveying stormwater; and WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan does not require stormwater standards or regulations for incorporation into the Town Municipal Code, rather provides information to facilitate an evaluation of future standards, regulations, or organizational structure needed support this plan; and WHEREAS, the adoption of this Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan could be advantageous for relevant grant funding eligibility; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees desires to adopt the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Estes Park Town Board of Trustees hereby adopts the Estes Valley Stormwater Master Plan. 2. The resolution to be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. DATED this day of , 2019. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 105       106 UTILITIES Memo To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Reuben Bergsten, Utilities Director Chris Eshelman, Water Superintendent Greg White, Town Attorney Date: July 9, 2019 RE: Ordinance 18-19 For 2019-2022 Water Rate Increase (Mark all that apply) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE LAND USE CONTRACT/AGREEMENT RESOLUTION OTHER______________ QUASI-JUDICIAL YES NO Objective: To publicly share information on recommended water rate increases and pass an ordinance to implement the new rates. Present Situation: The Town’s public water utility is a cost-based entity that relies solely on user fees. Costs and revenues must be balanced in order to maintain operations, plan for future upgrades and keep the utility in compliance with ever-increasing federal and state standards. A financial analysis is periodically performed to ensure the rates paid by customers are equitable between the rate classes and adequate to fund capital projects and operations. Public out-reach has been completed through utility bill messages, a newspaper column, news release, website updates, Town Board presentation, and providing opportunity for public comment. Proposal: The proposed rate increases are attached to the ordinance and were included in the documents presented to the public on the Town’s website. Advantages: The proposed rates will ensure continued high-quality water services, finance future upgrades through capital implement projects and meet ever increasing regulatory requirements. Upkeep of our systems is a critical part of maintaining our quality of life. These proposed rates aim to reduce the disparity between urban and rural rates and maintain reasonable water rates for life line customers by including 2000 gallons in the 107 base rate. Additionally, the new rates will fund the future of the Town’s water system by enabling a proactive approach to improvements. Disadvantages: There is usually resistance to any increase in user fees, however this will help the Town begin to address the infrastructure needs that are an issue nationwide. Action Recommended: Staff recommends approval of the proposed water rates. Finance/Resource Impact: This will increase the Water fund’s revenue. Level of Public Interest These new rates will affect all Town water customers. Public interest has been present, however, most direct communication with customers has resulted in their understanding of the need for the rate increases. Some customers will notice the change once it takes effect. We will continue to provide excellent customer service and explanation of why the increases are necessary. Sample Motion: We move to approve/deny the proposed water rates as set forth in Ordinance 18-19. Attachments: Ordinance 18-19 Presentation Water Rate Report Link 108 ORDINANCE NO. 18-19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WATER RATE SCHEDULES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WATER ACTIVITY ENTERPRISE WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park, through its Water Activity Enterprise, owns and operates its municipal water system; and WHEREAS, adjustment to the water rate schedule is recommended by the Town’s water rate consultant in order to provide stable revenue generation of revenue for the Water Activity Enterprise; and WHEREAS, the Town Board desires to adopt the new water rates for water service to all customers of the Town’s Water Activity Enterprise system attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: The new Water Rate Schedule set forth on Exhibit A is hereby adopted and made part of the Water Fee Schedule pursuant to the provision of Section 13.32.010 of the Municipal Code. Section 2: The Water Rate schedule set forth on Exhibit A shall become effective January 1, 2020. Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS ______ DAY OF _________, 2019. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By:___________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Town Clerk 109 I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the _____ day of ______, 2019, and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the _______ day of _________________, 2019, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. _________________________________________ Town Clerk 110 TO CALCULATE YOUR MONTHLY WATER BILL: Follow the formulas below using the charts for Base Fee and Volume Charge on this page Residential: Base Fee + ( [ (Gallons Used divided by 1,000) - 2] x Volume Charge) = Monthly Water Bill Non-Residential Base Fee + [ (Gallons Used divided by 1,000) x Volume Charge] = Monthly Water Bill RESIDENTIAL BASE FEE *Includes first 2,000 gallons of consumption per month Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural $42.33 $65.61 $44.44 $66.67 $46.67 $67.67 NON-RESIDENTIAL BASE FEE BY METER SIZE Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural 5/8"$36.47 $58.35 $40.84 $65.35 $44.93 $71.88 3/4"$36.47 $58.35 $40.84 $65.35 $44.93 $71.88 1"$60.89 $97.43 $68.20 $109.12 $75.02 $120.04 1-1/2"$121.42 $194.27 $135.99 $217.58 $149.59 $239.34 2"$194.34 $310.95 $217.66 $348.26 $239.43 $383.09 3"$364.64 $583.42 $408.40 $653.43 $449.23 $718.78 4"$607.85 $972.55 $680.79 $1,089.26 $748.87 $1,198.19 6"$837.16 $1,339.45 $937.61 $1,500.18 $1,031.38 $1,650.20 8"$1,944.61 $3,111.38 $2,177.96 $3,484.74 $2,395.76 $3,833.22 10"$2,795.68 $4,473.08 $3,131.16 $5,009.85 $3,444.27 $5,510.84 Note: Previously purchased taps that are not connected will be charged half the monthly base fee. VOLUME CHARGE BY RATE CLASS PER 1,000 GALLONS Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Residential $6.58 $10.20 $6.91 $10.37 $7.26 $10.53 Non-Residential $5.51 $8.82 $5.62 $8.99 $5.73 $9.17 Pumped Flow $9.21 $14.74 $9.67 $15.48 $10.16 $16.26 Bulk Water $6.31 $12.19 $6.75 $13.04 $7.09 $13.69 Bulk Water Dispenser $8.98 $9.54 $10.01 RATE CLASS METER SIZE 2020 2021 Effective for the 1st Billing Period in January 2020 2020 2021 2022 2020 2021 2022 Town of Estes Park, CO Proposed Water Rate Schedule 2020-2022 2022 All Residential Users EXHIBIT A 111 WATER IS WORTH IT PROTECTING OUR WATER FUTURE WHY RATE INCREASES? Town Board Key Outcome #2 “We have reliable, efficient and up‐to‐date infrastructure” •RELIABILITY, YEAR ROUND • Every spring and late summer reliability is strained when one of our two plants have to shut down. •AGING INFRASTRUCTURE, BACKLOG OF $75 MILLION • GLACIER PLANT IS PAST ITS USEFUL LIFE, $35 MILLION • WATER PIPES, $40 MILLION •REGULATIONS, CONSTANTLY INCREASING TO ENSURE QUALITY • Increased laboratory samples and reports • Valve exercising program • Increased inspections and reporting •Backflow site inspections for commercial customers 112 • We have two treatments plants, but neither can run all year round. “There is a constant pit in my stomach knowing that we are a single failure away from having a water supply emergency.”, Superintendent Eshelman • The Town provides emergency backup water to the YMCA. Surrounding households rely on our fourth street fill station. We supply multiple private water systems through consecutive system connections. • Funding our planned capital projects will enable the Glacier Plant to meet current regulations and operate year round within 8 years. The Glacier project will cost $35 Million. Town Board Mission “... provide high‐quality, reliable services for the benefit of our citizens, guests and employees ...” REGULATIONS ENSURE HIGH‐QUALITY “... provide high‐quality, reliable services for the benefit of our citizens, guests and employees ...” •AS REGULATIONS INCREASE TO ENSURE QUALITY, STAFF AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES ARE STRAINED •COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT (CDPH&E) RECLASSIFICATION OF THE GLACIER PLANT, 9/30/2019 • We must expedite a $4.5 MILLION raw water basin project •RECLAMATION NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION • Schedule must be accelerated to meet CDPH&E requirements $3.0 MILLION distribution project 113 Regulatory Mandates Modification at the Glacier Plant, 2019 New regulations mandated modifications to this bypass tube. Before 18 inch pipe After ($35,000, 240 staff hours) Regulatory Mandates Modification at the Glacier Plant, 2019 18 inch pipe 18” Bypass 114 AGING INFRASTRUCTURE Town Board Key Outcome #2 “We have reliable, efficient and up‐to‐date infrastructure” PROACTIVE Planned replacements are more cost effective than reacting to emergency repairs. • Funding our planned capital projects will enable staff to work on the $40 million in backlog of capital pipe replacement projects. • Projects are limited by availability of funds • Capital projects are prioritized based on: • Areas where there are water quality problems • Frequency and severity of leaks • Inadequate fire protection • Requirements of projects from outside the Water Division Town Board Key Outcome #2 “We have reliable, efficient and up‐to‐date infrastructure” 115 A Google search reveals what “Beyond useful life” looks like Steel galvanized  pipe after 60  years of use. AGING INFRASTRUCTURE Town Board Key Outcome #2 “We have reliable, efficient and up‐to‐date infrastructure” We have a backlog of $40 million in pipe replacement FUNDING THE FUTURE: THERE IS DECADES OF WORK TO BE DONE These rate increases will start financially supporting a long term plan to replace our aging infrastructure. • NEW EMPLOYEES ARE BUILT INTO THE RATE STRUCTURE TO PERFORM IN-HOUSE CONSTRUCTION • PERFORMING CONSTRUCTION IN-HOUSE COSTS CONSIDERABLY LESS COMPARED TO CONTRACTING IT OUT • THIS IMPROVES EFFICIENCY AS FEWER STAFF WILL BE PULLED FROM SCHEDULED WORK TO ADDRESS EMERGENCY LEAKS/REPAIRS 116 STABILIZATION OF REVENUES FIXED COSTS ARE HIGHER THAN FIXED REVENUE The monthly base fees help fund a portion of our fixed costs. There are many seasons our sales volumes are low, for example, wet years and winter. Even when customer do not use water we work so it is ready to serve them. When someone leaves for an extended period, we face costs to ensure water is available for fire protection. When water is not being used, we have water quality issues due to water age, which requires increased flushing of the system. MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE • BECAUSE PIPES ARE IN THE GROUND, MUCH OF WHAT WE DO IS OUT OF SIGHT OUT OF MIND • THE RATES YOU PAY ARE NOT JUST FOR WATER, YOU ARE PAYING FOR THE TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS WELL • YOU ARE PAYING FOR SAFETY, FIRE PROTECTION, PUBLIC HEALTH, WATER RIGHTS, CONVENIENCE AND RELIABILITY • AND IT IS STILL FAR LESS EXPENSIVE THAN BOTTLED WATER GALLON FOR GALLON • WE HAVE NUMEROUS FACILITIES THAT NEED TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT TOWN 117 STORAGE TANKS, FIXED COSTS CASTLE MOUNTAIN TANKBIG THOMPSON TANK KIOWA FALL RIVER MACGREGOR NOT PICTURED HERE: ● MARYS LAKE TANK ● GLACIER TANK THUNDER MOUNTAIN TANK FIXED OPERATIONAL COSTS OF TANKS Quarterly inspections, documented and  retained for state audits. Cleaned and inspected every five years  (we dive the tanks to inspect and clean  them, so water service is not interrupted) 118 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES FALL RIVER STRONG RIVERSIDE MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE MUCH OF OUR INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN THE GROUND, MUCH OF WHAT WE DO IS OUT OF SIGHT OUT OF MIND PROSPECT MTN. PUMP STATIONS FALL RIVER ESTATES KIOWA RIDGETHUNDER MOUNTAIN STRONG AVE. 119 MARYS LAKE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IT GETS A LITTLE MORE COMPLICATED 120 GLACIER CREEK WATER TREATMENT PLANT INSIDE THINGS LOOK A LITTLE DIFFERENT 121 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS AND COST SAVING •Decommissioned the Crystal Water Tank (reduction of seven pressure zones down to six, while increasing fire flows) •Researching how to decommission the Big Thompson Tank •Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) has eliminated the need for three shifts of personnel at the plants. •Grants and low interest loans from the Federal Government •Computerized Asset Management and workforce scheduling with ESRI and Lucity •Cost sharing enterprise software with Larimer County, Lafayette and Louisville •Outsourcing low volume, highly technical work to subject matter experts CITIZEN CONCERNS • 2000 GALLONS INCLUDED IN BASE FEE –•Revenue stabilization; the increased base fee help to cover our fixed costs. These proposed rates will cover 60% of our fixed costs by 2022. • RURAL VS. URBAN RATES • To our knowledge this has never been reviewed. We included in this study and proposed a reduction from a 1.6 multiplier to a 1.3 by 2025. • COMPARISON TO OTHER COMMUNITIES WE HAVE A LOT OF – • Pressure zones •Low customer density neighborhoods • Part-time customers • Board supported proactive strategic initiatives 122 WE ARE MAKING IT BETTER 123       124 NancyCurtiss<nancyniche-designhouse.com>Tue,Jul9,2019at1:15PMTo:TownClerk<TownClerk@estes.org>Cc:“planning@estes.org”<planningestes.org>ThankyouforallowingmetosharemyhumbleopinionwithyouregardingtheVacationRentalCap.HavinglivedinEstesforover30years,Ihaveseenmanychanges.However,sincetheVacationRentalBusinesshasgrownsomuchthelastfewyearsIfeelthatIshouldspeakupforalloftheyeararoundlocalswhopaythepriceforVacationRentals.Yes.Wedo.Wearetheforgottenones,wesupportEstes365daysayearWearenotjustatouristtown,peopleactuallylivehereforthejoyofit,Wepaythepricehecausewecan’tkeepteachers,nursesandotherprofessionalsnecessaryforouryeararoundcommuniw.Theygettiredofthecommuteandfindajobclosertoanaffordablelocation.Workforcehousingisnotgoingtofillthevoidoflostrealestateinventoryduetospeculators.“Workers”willnothaveemployment12monthsperyear,professionalswithfamiliesneedhomes,notapartments.Theyneedtobelivingandworkinginthecommunity,andavitalpartofourcommunity.IfinditparticularlydisturbingtonotethattheTownOfficialsconsiderincreasingthecapanadvantageinordertoincreaserevenues,andthescaretacticoflegalchallengesdueto“takings”preposterous.WhendidEstesbecomesogreedy?OurcommunityisatthebreakingpointPlease,pleaseconsiderleavingthemaximumcapforVacationRentalHomeswhereitis.Morevisitorsisnotnecessarilybetter.It’sallaboutthequalitynotthequantity.Thankyouforynurtime,NancyCurtiss PublicWorksEngineeringDevelopmentReviewProject:WildfireAcresDate:May21,2019ProjectContact:GregMuhonenphone:(970)577-3581email:gnmhoneniestes.orgAnalysis(PreliminaryPlat)Thisprojectisexpectedtopartiallyaddressasignificantcommunityneedforworkforcehousingbyprovidingexpandedhomeownershipopportunitiestoourresidents.ThePublicWorksDepartmentsupportsthisproject,providedthattheanticipatedimpactsaremitigated.Justaswithutilityservices,intensificationoflandusedensitytriggersexpansionoftransportationanddrainageinfrastructuretoservethenewneeds.Theanticipatednewvehicular,bicycle,andpedestriantrips,alongwithnewparkingdemandanddrainagepatterns,exceedthecapacityoftheexistinginfrastructure.Theproposedtransportationanddrainageimprovementsdescribedintheconditionsofapprovalattachedtothisprojectcarryforwardtheannexationconditionsneededtomitigatetheimpactsofthisdevelopmentthroughthedeveloper’sdeliveryofconcurrentadequatepublicfacilities.PublicWorksStandardRequirements(PreliminaryPlat)I.AllConstructionPlansforPublicImprovementsmustbesubmittedwith,orpriorto,thesubmittalofthefinalplat.Theplansmustbefinishedandapprovedpriortorecordingofthefinalplat.TheTownapprovaloftheplanswillbevalidfortwoyears.2.AllpublicstreetimprovementsshownontheapprovedConstructionPlansforPublicImprovementsforeachphaseofthisprojectmustbeinstalledorfinanciallysecuredpriortotheissuanceofanyfullbuildingpermitsinthespecificphasesoftheproject.3.Allproposedsidewalksand/ortrailswithinthepublicrightofwayshallcomplywiththePublicRight-of-WayAccessibilityGuidelines(PROWAG).ProposedpublicsidewalksortrailssituatedineasementsshallcomplywiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)guidelines.4.ARight-of-WayWorkPermitmustbeobtainedfromtheEngineeringDivisionpriortoworkinginanypublicstreetright-of-wayforutilityextensionsorstreetimprovements.ThestreetcutfeecanbewaivedifthisprojectwillbeplacingMlwidthoverlaysonthesestreets.Otherwise,thedevelopermustpaythenormalstreetcutfeesatthetimethepermitisissued.Thisworkshouldbecoordinatedwiththeowner(s)ofanyadjacentvacantlandsothenewoverlaysarenotcutbyfutureprojects.5.Thedevelopershallinstallsignsandpavementmarkingsonallinternaland/oradjacentcollectorandarterialroadwayspriortoacceptanceofthecompletedstreetsbytheTown.Thesigningandstripingplansshallbepreparedbythedeveloper’sProfessionalEngineerPage1of4 atascaleofI”=30’andincludedinthefinalconstructionplansubmittal.Theyshallincludealloffsitestripingmodificationsneededtoproperlytransitionthenewstripingtotheexistingmarkings.6.PursuanttoSectionlO.5.K.5oftheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode,allpublicimprovementsconstructedbythedeveloperandacceptedbytheTownshallbeguaranteedtobefreefromdefectsforaperiodoftwoyears.7.FuturedevelopmentapplicationswithinthisprojectmusthillycomplywithallprovisionsofSection7.12.C.loftheEstesValleyDevelopmentCodepertainingtoAdequatePublicFacilitiesfortransportation.ThepositivedeterminationofadequacyforthetransportationelementsservingthisprojectshallexpireattheendoftheShortRangeAnalysisyearcontainedintheTrafficImpactStudyforthisproject.Anewtrafficevaluationanddeterminationarerequiredforanydevelopmentwithinthisprojectthatisproposedafterthattime.PublicWorksConditions(PreliminaryPlat)I.ThefollowingpublicimprovementsshallbedesignedandconstructedbythedeveloperinaccordancewithLarimerCountyUrbanAreaStreetStandards(LCUASS)unlessdesigned&constructedbyothers.Allimprovementsshallbecompletedpriortotheissuanceofanybuildingpermits,unlessotherwiseapprovedpursuanttotheprovisionsinSection7.12.C.loftheEstesValleyDevelopmentCode.a.WildfireRoad(toacollectorstandard).Amulti-usetrial(8’minimumwidth)maybeprovidedinlieuofon-streetbikelanes.2.Proposedstormwaterdrainageimprovements(ponds,pipes,inlets,ditches,etc)situatedonprivatepropertyshallbeownedandmaintainedbytheownerassociationsandmaintainedsothatstormwaterdischargeintotheTown’spublicdrainageinfrastructurewillnotexceedthepredevelopmentflowratesidentifiedinthefinaldrainagereport.AMaintenancePlan(compliantwithChapter6ofVolume3oftheUrbanDrainageManual)fortheprivatedrainageimprovementsshallbesubmittedandapprovedwiththefinaldrainagereport.TheTownPublicWorksDepartmentwillonlymaintainnewpublicdrainageimprovementsinstalledinthepublicstreetrightofwayorintheadjacentpublicdrainageeasement.3.ThethicknessofnewpavementinstalledinthepublicrightofwayshallcomplywithLCUASSTable10-I,asamendedforproject-specificsubgradesoils.4.Acopyofthesignedmaintenanceagreementforthecommondriveways(perAppendixB,EVDC)sharedbytheownersofLots2,3,4,5,&6ofBlockIandalllotswithinBlock2shallbesubmittedpriortoapprovaloftheFinalPlat.Acopyofthisagreementshallbedeliveredtothenewownersoftheselotsattheclosingofeachsale.5.TheLarimerCountyEngineeringDivisionshallapprovethefinaldrainagereportpriortotheissuanceofanybuildingpermitswithinthisproject.PublicWorksTechnicalCorrections(PreliminaryPlat)(Minorchangesthatcanbemadetothefinaldrawings)Page2of4 1.Thedevelopershallinstall“NoParking”signsontheoutsideofDivideCircle,theinsideofDivideCirclewheretheroadwaywidthislessthan28’,andonbothsidesofWildfireRoadatlocationsapprovedonthefinalconstructionplans.2.ProvidesigningandstripingplansforDivideCircle,WildfireRoadandDryGulchRoad.3.ExpandthelanguageoftheDedicationStatementonthefinalplattoincludeanyproposedPedestrianAccessEasementsordrainageeasements.4.Theerosioncontrolplanmaybedelayedandsubmittedwiththefinalconstructionplansinsteadofwiththepreliminarydevelopmentplan/preliminaryplat.Submittalisnotwaived.5.Thepreliminaryplatshowsproposeddrainagesgradesat0.1%and0.2%.Thisistooflatandwillproducewaterpondinginthestreet.Thefinalgutterdrainagegradesshallbesteeperthan0.6%.6.Labelthewidthoftheproposedprivatepaveddriveways(twolocations).7.Inthetypicalsectionshowthelocationoftheproposedimprovementsspatiallyreferencedwithintherightofway.8.Removethenotefromthetypicalsectionsreferencing2:1orsteeperslopesontheroadsideditches.Slopesintherightofwayneedtobeflatterthan3:1.9.Correctthenoteindicatingremovalof6”ofasphalttoformthenewguttersonWildfireRoad.1understandtheintentistoremove1.5’fromeachside(leaving21’ofexistingroad)anda6”widepatchbeneaththefutureoverlay.10.Showhowthenewconcretecurbwillconnecttotheexistingcurbattheintersections/drivewaysonthenorthsideofWildfireRoad.Curbopeningsandpaveddrainagenmdownstotheexistingditchareacceptable.ShowcrosspanswhereneededtoconveygutterflowsacrossintersectionsanddrivewaysonWildfireRoad.II.TheTownhassomeextraRedi-RockwallblockleftoverfromtheDryGulchRoadprojectthatwewilldonatetothisprojectifneeded.12.ThetworoadsideditchesalongWildfireroadareproposedtoberegradedwithmowable4:1and3:1slopes.Theseslopesmustbearnwredwithaneffectiveerosioncontrolproductandreseededafterconstruction.Thedeveloperisresponsibletomaintaintheditchcontoursandlandscapingduringthetwoyearwarrantyperiod.PublicWorksTechnicalCorrections(PreliminaryPlat)(Theseitemsmustbeaddressedinaresubmittal)1.NonePublicWorksTechnicalCorrections(PreliminaryDrainageReport)(Theseitemsmustbeaddressedinaresubmittal)I.NonePublic‘WorksTechnicalCorrections(DraftTrafficImpactStudy)(Theseitemsmustbeaddressedinaresubmittal)1.NonePage3of4 Itemsrequiredtobesubmittedwitharesubmittal:1.NonePage4of4 FTownClerk<townclerkestes.org>ESTEsL!JPARKFwd:WildfireHomesDevelopment1messageJackieWilliamson<jwilliamson@estes.org>Mon,Jul8,2019at9:50PMTo:TownClerk<TownClerkestes.org>EmailhasbeensenttotheTrusteesalreadybutneedstobeprintedforthediasandincludedinthepacket.JackieForwardedmessageFrom:RitaKurelja<ritakureljahotmail.corn>Date:Mon,Jul8,2019at7:47PMSubject:WildfireHomesDevelopmentTo:tjirsaestes.org<tjirsaestes.org>.cwalker@estes.orgccwalker@estes.org>,pmartchinkestes.org<pmarIchinkestes.org>,cbangsestes.org<cbangsestes.org>,mcenac@estes.org<mcenacestes.org>,rnorristestes.org<rnorris@estes.org>,kzornes@estes.org<kzornesestes.org>Cc:jwiIliamsonestes.orgcjwilliamsonestes.org>MayorJirsa,MayorProternWalkerandTrustees:IamwritingtodayregardingtheWildfireHomesdevelopmentandwouldlikeoffermyfullsupportofthismuchneededproject.ItcomesasnosurprisetoanyofusthatthereisashortageofhousingintheEstesParkcornmunity.Supplyhassimplynotkeptupwithdemand.Thisisawelldocumentedfact.Localbusinessesandentities,includingtheTownofEstesParkcontinuetostruggletofindandretainqualifiedemployeesduetolackofhousingoptions.EachandeveryresidentoftheEstesvalleyisaffectedbythisimbalanceinhousingwhetheritbedirectlyorindirectly.Thishasbeenquantified,iswelldocumentedandundeniable.The128unitsinthisdevelopmentwillfillavarietyofhousingneedswithbothrentalsandhomeownershiptodirectlyservetheworkforceoftheEstescommunity.TheHousingNeedsassessmentcommissionedbytheEstesParkHousingAuthoritywasclearthatavarietyofhousingtypeswereneeded.WildfireHomeswillbeanassettoEstesParkandwillgoalongwayinmakingadifferencetothehousingshortagecurrentlybeingexperienced.TheWildfireHomesdevelopersisaLOCALentity.TheprincipalsMarkandMelissaWestoverandRickandSusanAllnuttresideinEstesParkandGlenHaven.Theyresideinandcareaboutthiscommunity.Theyareexperiencedandcommitted.Thisisawellthoughtoutandcarefullyplanneddevelopmentdesignedtofilltheneedsandspiritofthecommunityinwhichwealllive.Itrulybelieveitwillmakeadifference.Iurgeyoualltovoteintheaffirmativeforthisimportantproject.Anaffirmativevotefortheworkingpeopleinourcommunity.AnaffirmativevoteforthebettermentofEstesPark.RitaKureljaAllenspark,ColoradoSentfrommyiPhoneJackieWilliimsonAdministrativeServicesDirector/TownClerk170MacGregorAvenueP0Box1200EstesPark,CO80,517970-577-4771(p)directline970-577-4777(I))generalline970-577-4770(I)jwilliamsonestes.orge-maillogo.jpg -ITownClerk<townclerkestes.org>£5TESPARFwd:proposedwaterratechangeImessageChrisEshelman<ceshelman@estes.org>Mon.Jul8.2019at7:41AMTo:TownClerk<townclerkestes.org>FYTForwardedmessageFrom:NancyWillacks<eemawowlgmail.com>Date:Sat,Jul6,2019at5:23PMSubject:proposedwaterratechangeTo:<ceshelman©estes.org>Iamopposedtothenewwaterrateschedulewhichmakestheunder2000gallonusagesubjecttoa30%increaseincost.Byleavingtheunder2000categoryandincreasingeachcategoryby11.2%(whichisequalandfair)youwillhaveahigherincomethanyourproposedschedule.Irespectfullyrequestthismatterbelookedintofurtherbeforecausinghardshiponthoseofusthatlivehereyeararoundandtrytoconserveourusageofthispreciouscommodity.Sincerely,NancyLWillocksChrisEshelmonWaterSuperintendent,TownofEstesPark970-577-3630ceshelmanestesorg