The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Community Development Community Services 2013-06-27Preparation date: June 17, 2013 NOTE: The Community Development / Community Services Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. AGENDA TOWN OF ESTES PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE June 27, 2013 8:00 a.m. Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT 2. COMMUNITY SERVICES a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i) None. b) REPORTS i) Senior Center Report. Manager Mitchell. ii) Fairgrounds & Events Report. Director Winslow. iii) Verbal Updates and Committee Questions. 3. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a) RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TOWN BOARD i) None. b) REPORTS i) Sign Code Analysis & Recommended Updates. Code Compliance Officer/Planner Kleisler and Don Elliott/Clarion Associates. ii) Comprehensive Plan Modernization. Senior Planner Shirk. iii) Community Development Monthly Report. Senior Planner Shirk. iv) Verbal Updates and Committee Questions. Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, May 23, 2013 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 23rd day of May, 2013. Committee: Chair Ericson, Trustees Elrod and Norris Attending: Chair Ericson, Trustees Elrod and Norris Also Attending: Town Administrator Lancaster, Assistant Town Administrator Richardson, Director Chilcott, Director Winslow, Public Information Officer Rusch, and Deputy Town Clerk Deats Absent: None Chair Ericson called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. PUBLIC COMMENT. None. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT. REPORTS. Reports provided for informational purposes and made a part of the proceedings.  June Special Events Report – The busy event season began last weekend with a successful JazzFest and Parade of Years Car Show, and will continue into October. Registration for Wool Market workshops is up slightly and the vendor barn is full with a waiting list for this year’s event. The June schedule includes both returning and new events such as the Ranch Horse Versatility Show at the Fairgrounds and the Rocky Mountain Bazaar in Bond Park. Planning for the USA Pro Challenge continues with a public informational meeting scheduled for June 6th.  Evaluation of Special Events – An evaluation of Special Events to determine cost vs. benefit was done at the Town Board study session on May 14th. In addition, Dir. Winslow met with VisitEstesPark staff to discuss how to evaluate the indirect benefit of events as well, and noted that sometimes what the Town and the LMD are looking for are two different things, for example, attendance at events as opposed to overnight stays in Estes Park. Staff will look into the possibility of renting the ice skating rink again for this coming winter from the City of Fort Collins, as well as discuss organizational leadership for next year’s WinterFest.  Event Participation January - April – Event participation has been good through April 2013 with WinterFest numbers at approximately 9,000, and typical numbers for the dog pull in February.  Museum/Senior Center Master Plan Next Steps – A final report will be compiled and presented to the Board at either the June 25th or July 9th Town Board meeting with a request for approval to adopt the report as a master plan document. The Board will be working on their long-term vision for the facility with a key component to the process being what the Estes Valley Recreation and Park District (EVRPD) decides to do in regard to a community center. Trustee Elrod expressed concern with the timeframe involved in addressing the needs of the museum. Dir. Winslow said he will inquire into EVRPD’s timeline for making decisions related to a community center. Community Development / Community Services – May 23, 2013 – Page 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. REPORTS. Reports provided for informational purposes and made a part of the proceedings.  Community Development Monthly Report – Dir. Chilcott highlighted activities of the Community Development Department. She said building permit activity, valuation, and development activity are all increasing. She reported that staff is working with Fire Marshal Robinson and the Fire District to promote building safety month and conduct a community forum on fire and building safety tips; and noted that an NFPA 13 sprinkler system is being installed at the Courtyard Shop property. Work continues on the Town’s addressing system and updating of the Town street map. She noted that an agreement to piggyback on Larimer County’s GIS software license contract is in the works which will increase availability of the GIS software to Town staff and save thousands of dollars in licensing costs. Dir. Chilcott said that revisions to the Municipal Code will be necessary related to compliance with the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program and will be brought forward to the Town Board in November. The response to Code Compliance Officer/Planner Kleisler’s ongoing outreach programs continues to be positive. Code compliance areas of concern include noxious weeds, vacation home rentals, dark skies, animal/human interactions, property maintenance, and community aesthetics. The Committee discussed vacation home licensing/permitting requirements and enforcement and the possibility of staff monitoring websites such as VRBO to confirm listed properties are licensed and compliant with rules and regulations. One opening exists on the Estes Valley Board of Adjustments; and two county seats need to be filled on the Estes Valley Planning Commission (EVPC). The Planning Commission approved the extension of the timeframe for rebuilding of non-conforming structures related to the Woodland Heights Rebuilding Program through June 30, 2015, to coincide with the timeframe adopted by Larimer County for the High Park Fire Rebuilding Program. Dir. Chilcott noted that to date, revenues exceed projections and expenses are below budget. Chair Ericson requested Dir. Chilcott provide a report that would include the number of permit requests, issued permits, and cancelled requests in order to evaluate workload related to increased activity.  Sign Code Update Status – Following a review of the Sign Code by Don Elliot of Clarion Associates, it was recommended that the Sign Code be re-drafted and put into a more practical and modern format; as well as to re-vamp the Creative Sign Design Program to increase its usability. It was Mr. Elliot’s opinion that the content of the Sign Code is good, but that it is difficult to find answers to common questions. In addition, a brochure will be created to concisely describe the real estate sign rules and regulations for the Estes Valley. Staff will contact real estate businesses that are displaying off-premise signs and request that they be removed.  Harmony Update – The Town Board will hear an annexation request and fee waiver request at the May 28th Town Board meeting. ADMINISTRATION. REPORTS. Reports provided for informational purposes and made a part of the proceedings.  Public Information Quarterly Report – Highlights of the reported included: o Outreach to the community about the America in Bloom Program and Judges’ visit which will be on July 11th and 12th. o The Bear Education Task Force continues to reach out to the community to provide education about wildlife-friendly trash containment, which includes a responsible business pledge that is being written by the Task Force and Bears R Us. Waste Management recently made upgrades to bear-resistant dumpsters available to their customers at no extra charge. In addition, an informational flyer was sent to residents in the most recent utility billing cycle, the Estes Area Lodging Association (EALA) is providing information to guests at local accommodations establishments related to Community Development / Community Services – May 23, 2013 – Page 3 wildlife-friendly trash management, and the Visitors Center staff also distributes this information. o A public program on Emergency Preparedness was held on May 9th which offered information about how to prepare for an evacuation. o “Payport” has been added to the Town’s website to allow on-line payments for a variety of Town services and fees. o The Bugle newsletter is being prepared for mailing in June. The Committee voiced concerns about the cost of mailing this document and proposed it be sent via email or by subscription.  Verbal Updates – o In the future, Administration and Public Information reports and updates will be included on Town Board meeting agendas as opposed to being part of the Community Development / Community Services Committee agenda. There being no further business, Chair Ericson adjourned the meeting at 9:27 a.m. Cynthia Deats, Deputy Town Clerk Community Services Memo To: Community Development / Community Services Committee From: Lori Mitchell, Senior Center Manager Date: June 27, 2013 RE: Senior Center Quarterly Report Background: Senior Center and Museum Master Plan The Town’s consultants presented the Senior Center and Museum Master Plan preferred alternatives at the May 14 Town Board meeting and are preparing the final report which will appear as an action item on the June 25 Town Board agenda. Additionally, the moderator for the National Institute of Senior Centers / National Council on Aging Senior Center web forum recently featured the Master Plan in a discussion thread for its members. Live Well 2013 Expo The Senior Center and its partners, Estes Park Medical Center and Estes Park Good Samaritan, are planning a new senior expo to be held on September 18, 2013 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Estes Park Conference Center. The free half-day event will showcase life-enhancing ideas for Estes Park seniors. Exhibitors and booths will feature products and services useful for those age 50+. Demonstrations will include Tai Chi and functional movement, balance exercises, the healing power of laughter, brain fitness and chair yoga. The event flyer is attached to this report. Programs, Events and Travel The Senior Center offers a wide variety of monthly planned programs and daily drop-in opportunities. Attendance at planned programs is running at 90% of capacity through the first five months of 2013. Planned programs include free and fee-based programs such as adult education series, large and small group one-time presentations and classes, medical education programs, and day trips. Drop-in events include art studios and craft groups, pool (billiards), Medicare counseling, blood pressure clinics, card games, bridge lessons, coffee hours, Wii games, public computer and Wi-Fi use, fitness programs such as Tri Fit, Tai Chi and ZUMBA, Chair Yoga and much more. Overall, attendance at drop-in opportunities is only 5% or 202 lower than the same period in 2012. The May 2013 snowstorms affected attendance with 30% fewer visits to programs and drop-in opportunities as compared to May 2012. The Senior Center now offers seven (an increase of one new class over 2012) fitness classes weekly and had 1,526 visits to those classes in the first five months of 2013. This is comparable to the same five-month period in 2012 with 1,645 visits. Planned Programs and Events – January through July 2013:  The Music of J.S. Bach – a six-week series taught by Dr. Derald DeYoung  Recreational Group Drumming – a twice-monthly class taught by music therapist Nancy Bell.  Supreme Court Discussion Group – a weekly discussion group facilitated by Eric Waples meets monthly  Legal and Financial Planning for Alzheimer’s – a one-time program presented by the Alzheimer’s Association  Memory Loss, Diabetes and Heart Disease: Is there a link? – a one-time program presented by the Alzheimer’s Association  Living with Alzheimer’s: Middle Stage – a one-time program presented by the Alzheimer’s Association  The Civil War – The Union Resurgent – a four-week class offered in partnership with the Park School District  American Red Cross Preparedness Party – a one-time workshop presented by the Red Cross and the University of Colorado Aspen Club  The World’s Greatest Paintings – a twelve-week series facilitated by Betty Dutton  Creating a Paper Trail for Your Heirs – a one-time program presented by Marsha Yelick, Common Cents Counts  The Upside of Downsizing – a one-time program presented by the University of Colorado Health Aspen Club  Crafting classes – two classes taught by Carma Thomas  Getting the most out of your IPad – originally planned as a one-time class and now repeated regularly – in partnership with Estes Park Internet Computer Users Group  Music Theory Concepts – a three-session class taught by Dr. Derald DeYoung  Managing Money During Retirement – a one-time program by Marsha Yelick , Common Cents Counts  Tech-Savvy Seniors – a one-time program featuring safety tips for using the Internet and how to avoid scams - presented by the Better Business Bureau and the University of Colorado Aspen Club  Everybody needs a hobby- what’s yours?- a one-time program featuring the woodcarving art and wisdom of Frank Gunter  Health Care Matters – a 90-minute interactive presentation by the Health District of Northern Larimer County grant program  Furry Angels – a one-time program featuring the canine therapy program of University of Colorado Health / Poudre Valley Hospital  Medicare Prescription Drug Plan counseling – offered two months in the fall by the University of Colorado Healthy Aspen Club  AARP Safe Driving Class –The class occurs monthly on the fourth Thursday Other events  Summer Breakfast Buffets – staff assists Estes Park Senior Citizens Center, Inc. with their four fundraising breakfasts. Dates are June 8, July 13, August 10 and September 14 from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Breakfasts are the major fundraising event for EPSCC, Inc.; the public is invited to attend. 2013 Day Trips The Senior Center offered 23 day trips in the first seven months of 2013. Staff develops each trip based on research completed by program volunteer.  A Day in Pompeii – Denver Museum of Nature and Science  War Horse – Buell Theatre  Becoming Van Gogh – Denver Art Museum  Molly Brown House – Denver  The Unsinkable Molly Brown – Candlelight Dinner Playhouse  Mammoths and Mastodons – Denver Museum of Nature and Science  Black Hawk and Central City (three trips)  Cinzzetti’s Italian Market – Northglenn  Georgia O’Keefe exhibit – Denver Art Museum  Rockies baseball – (two trips offered)  Les Misérables – Buell Theatre  Wild Animal Sanctuary – Keenesburg, Colorado  The Sorcerer - Empire Lyric Players - Denver  Guys and Dolls – Candlelight Dinner Playhouse  High Tea – Castle Marne, Denver  Celestial Seasonings and Leanin’ Tree Museum – Boulder  Old Town Fort Collins walking tour, brewery and Museum of Discovery  History Colorado Center – Denver  Greenbriar Inn – Denver  Domo Japanese Gardens and Museum - Denver Overall Attendance Through the first five months of 2013, overall attendance to programs and services of the Senior Center was 11,699 as compared to 11,651 in the same period in 2012. Current Meal Program Data In addition to noon dining room meals and Meals on Wheels, the Senior Center offers a special themed luncheon monthly. Themed luncheons during the first seven months of include Valentine’s, Mardi gras, St. Patrick’s Day, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day and a Rodeo Week luncheon. After the first five months of 2013, the Meals on Wheels program is running 120 meals or 5% down as compared to the same period in 2012. After the first five months of 2013, dining room meals are down 11% or 314 meals as compared to the same period in 2012. Snow affected dining room attendance several days this spring. Blizzard Boxes The Senior Center received a 2013 grant to distribute approximately 200 blizzard boxes to local seniors this fall and winter. Boxes contain 9 shelf stable meals to assist seniors in times of bad weather when they cannot get to the store or to the Senior Center, etc. This project is funded by a $4400 grant from the Larimer County Office on Aging. Budget: N/A Recommendation: N/A FIRST ANNUALFIRST ANNUAL SENIOR EXPO 2013 A half-day expo showcasing life-enhancing ideas for Estes Park seniors. Exhibitors Demonstrations Refreshments Good Company ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 189:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. FREE EVENT! Tai Chi/Functional Movement Balance Exercises Healing Power of Laughter Brain Fitness Chair Yoga 1 2 3 4 DEMONSTATION LINE UP 5 Estes Park Conference Center 201 S. St. Vrain, Estes Park, Colorado 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 JFMAMJJASOND 2010 2009 2011 2012 2013 Senior Center 5.31.13 page 1Meals on Wheels, dining room and take-out meals Meals on Wheels Current month = May = 462 2009 Total = 4,430 2010 Total = 4,493 2011 Total = 5,158 2012 Total = 5,551 2013 YTD = 2,283 Dining room meals Previous month, April = 471 = 47% capacity Current month, May = 509 = 50% capacity Includes take-out meals ( 6 ), member (470) and non-member meals ( 33 ) 2009 Total = 8,125 2010 Total = 7,936 2011 Total = 7,674 2012 Total = 7,164 2013 YTD = 2,573 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 JFMAMJJASOND 2010 2009 2011 2012 2013 Month to month comparison May 2009 310 2010 332 2011 430 2012 561 2013 462 Month to month comparison May 2009 604 2010 671 2011 604 2012 546 2013 509 1 snow closure day / heavy snow days Annual meal totals Meals on Wheels and Senior Center dining room - combined Senior Center 5.31.13 page 2Meals on Wheels, dining room and take-out meals Month to month comparison May 2009 914 2010 1,003 2011 1,034 2012 1,107 2013 971 1 snow closure day /heavy snow 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD 11,356 13,937 14,730 13,926 16,644 13,001 12,555 12,429 12,832 12,715 4,856 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 JFMAMJJASOND 2010 2009 2011 2012 2013 Combined meal totals – monthly comparison 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 JFMAMJJASOND Attendance at activities and programs Current month May = 1,100 (number of visits, drop-in and planned programs combined) 2009 Total = 15,981 2010 Total = 16,722 2011 Total = 17,653 2012 Total = 15,927 2013 YTD = 5,804 Senior Center / program attendance 5.31.13 page 3 Current month - May “Planned programs” potential or ideal capacity 382 “Planned programs/% utilization” *297 or 78% capacity *programs as a % of ideal capacity/actual “Drop-in” programs utilization 803 Average programs capacity YTD 2013 = 90% Average programs capacity 2012 = 99% Previous month – April “Planned programs” potential or ideal capacity 234 “Planned programs/% utilization” *216 or 92% capacity *programs as a % of ideal capacity/actual “Drop-in” programs utilization 863 Month to month comparison May 2009 1,228 2010 1,298 2011 1,462 2012 1,129 2013 1,100 1 snow closure day /heavy snow Average programs capacity 2011 = 108% Average programs capacity 2010 = 104% Average programs capacity 2009 = 102% January TOEP meetings (40) County commissioners (13 ) NARFE (4) Mayor (30 ) Sister Cities ( 0) February Mayor (22) County commissioner (10) Sister Cities (6) PD (10) March Mayor (37) TOEP meetings (27) Via Advisory (12) County Commissioner (7) CIA (40) April Mayor (30) TOEP meetings (38) May Jared Polis (40) TOEP meetings (38) County Commissioners (13) Sister Cities (9) June July August September October November December 2013 non-rental users = 453 2008 non-rental users = 270 2009 non-rental users = 888 2010 non-rental users = 1040 2011 non-rental users = 939 2013 non-rental users = 864 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Year total = 31,590 May = 2,498 Year total = 34,228 May = 2,602 Year total = 29,776 May = 2,451 Senior Center / overall attendance 5.31.13 page 4 2013 Senior Center rental users January (0) February (0) March (40) April (100) May (0) 2013 Senior Center rental users = 140 2008 rental users = 599 2009 rental users = 191 2010 rental users = 374 2011 rental users= 308 2012 rental users = 254 ---------------------------------------------------- 2013 Hydroplant picnic grounds rental users January (0) 2013 Hydroplant rentals/ users = 0 2008 = 23 events / 1,642 users 2009 = 21 events / 1,451 users 2010 = 17 events / 1,036 users 2011= 20 events / 1,514 users 2012 = 26 events / 1,661 users --------------------------------------------------- 2013 Museum meeting room users are reported in Museum quarterly report YTD = 11,699 May = 2,406 Year total = 23,091 May = 1,751 2013 Senior Center non-rental users Beginning January 2013, overall attendance reflects attendance at Center + Meals on Wheels services combined. Prior years have been adjusted for comparison. To: Community Development/Community Services Committee Administrator Lancaster Assistant Administrator Richardson From: Bo Winslow, Community Services Director Date: June 27, 2013 RE: Quarterly Report Report: In the second quarter staff has most of the event calendar put together for the 2013 season. There are always a few late events that come in and they are addressed on an individual basis. Jazz Fest took place on May 18th and 19th. This year with great weather, attendance numbers were up significantly from 2012. The Town hires a promoter to produce this event. This individual is very well connected in the jazz world and brings in world class talent. This event has a large draw from the Denver area. Jazz Fest: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1,395 1,235 1,500 1,250 628 433 1,165 The Safety Fair is another May event. This is a great community event that educates the public about the different public safety agencies around the area. Safety Fair: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 400 750 500 400 500 350 500 Memo Community Services April and May staff spend most of their time working on Wool Market, Rodeo, and preparing the facilities for use. With Wool Market, staff is processing animal and workshop registrations, finalizing contracts with teachers, judges, vendors, and superintendants. Wool Market is one of the top 3 fiber shows in the nation. This event brings crowds from the local community as well as from all over the nation. This year participants came all the way from Oregon to Pennsylvania. Numbers for the event are still being calculated, it appears as though this will be the second largest Wool Market in 23 years. Cowboy Mounted Shooting will be back again for its third year. This is a great group to work with and is very appreciative of what the Town has to offer. Cowboy Mounted shooting is one of the fastest growing equestrian sports. Staff is getting geared up for all of the new events this year. This year is the first year for our Chuck Wagon Cook-off…where we will bring in Wagons from all over the front range and beyond for . We will also be hosting a Ranch Horse Versatility Show, and of course staff is getting geared up for August when we will be honored to host part of the US Pro Challenge. Ranch Horse Versatility is a new event at the fairgrounds. This event is another fast growing equestrian event. The event shows the diversity of the ranch horse and how it is trained to perform a variety of different skills. The show has over 150 horses and is preparing to sign a contract for 2014. Staff continues to work with all the events in Town such as Cowboy Sing-A-Longs and Performance Park concert series. The Art Market had their art show in Bond Park and attendance was similar to last year with an estimated 19,000 attending the event. Staff continues to work on the development of the property. With construction underway staff will need to work closely with show managers to understand how to best utilize the limited space as well as the construction. All managers are enthusiastic about the plans and are looking forward to seeing it all come together. In 2012, the Town held a Block Party at the Fairgrounds in lieu of the Fireworks. Feedback from the party was so positive we are going to do something similar this year. The Block Party will be on July 3 and will be a great event for the community to come together while the busy summer season is going on. This event will be Wednesday, July 3 at the Fairgrounds with times TBD. (Fireworks are still planned for the 4th of July). Page 1 To: Community Development/Community Services Committee Town Administrator Lancaster From: Alison Chilcott, Director Date: June 27, 2013 RE: Sign Code Analysis & Recommended Updates Background: In late 2010, the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees adopted significant revisions to the Sign Code based on recommendations from the Sign Code Task Force. Revisions were aimed at relaxing code standard and improving the internal consistency, clarity, and readability of the document. Over the past 2 ½ years, staff has worked with the revised Sign Code and recommends that additional revisions be made, primarily to improve usability. At the June Community Development/Community Services meeting, staff wants to inform Committee of concerns with the revised code and obtain Committee feedback on next steps. 1. Usability. The object of internal consistency, clarity, and readability has not been met. Unfortunately, the Sign Code is harder to read and understand than it was prior to the revisions. Staff struggles to provide customers with answers to simple questions. Examples: (1) The Sign Code contains a list of Prohibited Signs. Reading this list a customer may assume these signs are prohibited, but in some cases they are allowed. (2) The Sign Code string lighting regulations conflict with Estes Valley Development Code exterior lighting regulations. The strictest apply. 2. Creative Sign Design Program. One of the highest priorities of the Task Force was creation of this program. However, the program has not been used. Community Development staff find that understanding the guidelines is difficult at best. This may be part of the reason the program hasn’t been used. Staff has consulted Don Elliot, Clarion Associates, to obtain an expert opinion about staff concerns and to determine if there are other issues with the Sign Code. His initial review comments are provided below for consideration. Don Elliot will attend the Community Development/Community Services Committee meeting to provide the committee with an overview of these issues and how they can be corrected. Community Development Memo Page 2  The code is poorly organized. In particular, the key regulations are split between tables and text that often appear to address the same topics, making it difficult to tell which regulations are supposed to govern or how to reconcile apparently differing standards for the same type of sign.  The last four sections (§17.66.170 Large-scale community special event signs, §17.66.180 Town- sponsored special event signs, §17.66.190 Temporary banners commercial use, §17.66.200 Small-scale community special event signs, and §17.66.210) are complex given the frequency of use, and could be simplified.  Some sections of the code contain content-based restrictions on sign messages that could be removed. While eliminating all content-based regulations is difficult, and the courts sometimes uphold minor exceptions, it is wise to eliminate as many content-based restrictions as possible.  The code does not include time limits for the issuance of sign permits or the resolution of appeals related to sign permits, which courts are increasingly considering necessary. (See Mahaney v City of Englewood, 226 P.3d 1214 (Colo. App. 2009).  Some of the graphics in the code are difficult to read or to relate to the standards they illustrate. Budget: TBD. Town Board has a proposed 2014 objective to revise the Sign Code. Staff recommends a consultant, with sign code expertise, draft sign code revisions. Staff does not have the expertise necessary to re-draft the sign code. Recommendation: This is a report only. Unless concerns are expressed, staff will proceed with obtaining cost estimates for revisions for consideration during 2014 budget sessions. Sample Motion: N/A Page 1 To: Estes Valley Planning Commission CC: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Larimer County Board of County Commissioners Town Administrator Lancaster From: Alison Chilcott, Community Development Director Dave Shirk, Senior Planner Phil Kleisler, Code Compliance Officer/Planner Date: June 18, 2013 RE: Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan Modernization What are we discussing this month? Discussion purpose. Review what we’ve done: Staff will review and ask for feedback on the modernized Chapter 6 Community-Wide Policies. Outline where we are going: Review rough timeline below. Obtain Planning Commission input on essential matters: Staff will continue to ask — as we move forward, is there anything else from the Planning Commissioners perspective that staff must consider? Background Late last year Planning Commission and Town Board directed staff to modernize the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. Six modernization options were considered and Option 2 (below) was selected. Option 2: Review and update facts, remove obsolete references, remove information that is no longer relevant What does this involve? Staff will prepare a work plan for review. Initial staff thoughts are to update the Economic Overview Chapter Three and Economic Profile Appendix One first, followed by an update of Land Use Chapter Four and Mobility and Circulation Chapter Five, etc. with periodic review by Planning Commission and Town Board. Because the facts and figures rather than long-term vision is being updated, public input would occur at regular meetings only. This is Community Development Memo Page 2 a way forward that involves minimal cost. Staff will draft the update. The 2013 draft budget includes funds for a consultant to assist with the 2010 census analysis. What has been accomplished since Option 2 was selected? As directed, staff has begun work on Option 2 to modernize the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. January-March  Researched other comprehensive plans. Presented a modernization outline describing format and design, and obtained positive feedback from Planning Commission (outline attached). Initiated conversations with Visit Estes Park about use of Visit Estes Park professional photos and incorporating the Brand Strategy into the design. Initiated conversations with Partners for Commerce about use of graphics from the Partners for Commerce report and obtained approval to use those graphics. Initiated conversations with Amy Lane with Basis Architecture and Slate Communications, for assistance with data visualization and infographics.  Facilitator, Guy Cornelius, kept us focused on the big picture at the March study session meeting, helped staff listen to your input, and help us move forward to achieve the goal of a modernized plan by the end of 2013. Meeting notes summarizing agreements were distributed by staff. Agreements included, but were not limited to: o Agreed that staff would do the work in manageable chunks with Commission review. o Agreed concise is good o Agreed plan will be internet-navigable. o Staff and the Commission will keep track of topics and plan elements as we execute Option 2 for further consideration by the Commission and elected officials. April/May  Purchased the Adobe Creative Suite, including InDesign, for Dave Shirk and Phil Kleisler. Established plan template in InDesign. Final document will be formatted for use on Windows and Apple computers, including I-Pads. Made contact with BBC Consultants, a consulting group that has worked with the Town for many years, to update census information. Met with Slate Communications about infographics, worked with Jill Fischer on GIS updates to incorporate in the plan, continued modernizing Chapter 6 Community-Wide Policies. Page 3 What to Expect Moving Forward? This general timeline will be refined. Month Draft for Planning Commission Review and Comment June Chapter 6 Community-Wide Policies Revisions July Chapter 6 Community-Wide Policy Revisions; Chapter 5 Mobility and Circulation Revisions; Chapter 7 Action Plan (Staff and Planning Commission updated in 2011/2012; update to be reformatted) Chapter 4 Land Use August Chapter 3 Economic Overview (rough draft) Appendix 1: Economic Profile (rough draft) September Fine tuning of above chapters Chapter1 The Planning Process (rough draft) Chapter 2 Planning the Valley’s Future (rough draft) October Appendix 2 Resource Information November Letter of Introduction/Acknowledgements Draft of Entire Modernized Plan December/January Plan adopted by Estes Valley Planning Commission and certified by Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners As modernization progresses, staff will present drafts Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Board of County Commissioners frequently. Page 4 June  Continued to work on GIS, completed a significant portion Chapter 6 modernization for Planning Commission review. Portions of Chapter 6 were presented and feedback obtained in prior meetings. 10 Neighborhood Plans Chapter Seven Neighborhood Plans Overview The Estes Valley consists of seven distinct planning areas (neighborhoods). Each area is defined by unique natural resources; physical features land uses, and jurisdictional and/or special improvement boundaries. Downtown: Is defined by the boundary of the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority in the mid-1990s. Includes distinct areas, the downtown commercial core, the Stanley Historic District. The North End: Primarily consists of large- lot single-family residential development and commercial accommodations uses along the Highway 34 corridor. Fish Creek/Little Prospect Mountain: Contains the widest variety of uses including a residential use (large lot, small lot, and multi- family development) light industrial, highway commercial, medical, and accommodations uses. Carriage Hills/Mary’s Lake: Is geographically the largest of the seven planning areas. Land use is almost entirely primarily residential, with some accommodations use on Highway 7 and Mary’s Lake Road. Tunnel Road/Aspen Brook: The most intensive land use is the YMCA of the Rockies. Along the valley bottoms, adjacent to waterways there are small-scale accommodations uses, and residential development. Beaver Point: Contains a variety of land uses, including highway-oriented commercial uses along the Highway 36 corridor. The Elm Road industrial is the main industrial area in the Valley and supports residents and guests. Fall River: Land uses within the planning area consist primarily of single-family residential and accommodations uses. Accommodations exist primarily west of the intersection of the US 34 bypass and the US 34 business loop, on both sides of the highway. The established planning policies and development guidelines: • Are unique to the each planning area , community of residents and businesses. • Are complementary and reinforce the overall comprehensive community-wide goals, objectives, policies and the land use plan. • Reflect specific objectives and policies which the neighborhood residents felt were critical to include as part of the Com- prehensive Plan.DRAFT 10 Neighborhood Plans Overview 11RIVERSIDEDR FALLRIVER R D MAR Y SLAKE RDHIGHDRHIGHWAY36 B IG THOMPSO NAVE D E V ILSGULCHRDE HIG H W A Y 3 6SSAINTVRAINAVEHIGHWAY66MORAINEAVE TU N N E LRDTR AI L RID G E RDHIGHWAY7UV7 £¤36 £¤34 £¤36 £¤34 £¤34 Beaver Point Spur 66 Downtown Fall River Road Fish Creek Marys Lake North End [0 1 2½ Miles DRAFT 12 Neighborhood Plans Neighborhood Plans Downtown The Downtown area is the only planning area completely within the Town boundary. Downtown is generally defined by the district boundaries of the former Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority (dissolved by public vote in 2010). Natural and Scenic Resources Open Space The Town of Estes Park has acquired property along West and East Riverside Drive which front on the Big Thompson River. The Town has converted much of this area into a riverfront greenbelt. It is anticipated that this will continue. The Knoll property is a landmark as the rock cliffs are a backdrop for the entry into downtown. The Knoll-Willows Master Plan was adopted by the Town Board in February 2005. This master plan is a culmination of land assembly and conservation easements initiated by the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority in 1989. The Bond Park Master Plan was adopted in March 2010, and is guiding revitalization of Bond Park, including significant infrastructure upgrades, a new plaza area on the east side, and improved pedestrian amenities on Elkhorn Avenue. Topography The elevation within Downtown ranges from approximately 7,500 feet where the Big Thompson River drains into Lake Estes, to approximately 7,620 feet at the highest point within the Stanley Historic District. Topography within downtown is flat to gently sloping, with rock escarpments defining the perimeter. DRAFT 12 Neighborhood Plans Downtown 13 To the north and east of downtown (Stanley Village and the Stanley History District), terrain is gently sloping from north to south. South from Elkhorn, on Moraine Avenue, the terrain is gently rolling with a large cut slope identifying the western boundary of the area. The western portion of the planning area includes the extension of downtown along the US 34 business loop and the Elkhorn Lodge. The terrain is generally flat in this area, with large escarpments defining the southern boundary of the planning area. Viewsheds There are many important viewsheds within the planning area. Views from the downtown to RMNP and Longs Peak have been framed and maintained as part of the downtown design effort. The views from the Stanley property to RMNP and Longs Peak have been carefully considered in master planning for the Stanley Historic District. Maintaining downtown views of the surrounding rock cliffs is important. Vegetation Native vegetation is relatively sparse within downtown. Some stands of pine can be found on hillsides. Natural drainages include willow and other riparian vegetation along the Big Thompson and Fall River. Extensive ornamental and native plantings along both Elkhorn Avenue and the Riverwalk have been done in conjunction with the downtown streetscape improvements following the 1982 Lawn Lake flood. Rock Features There are numerous natural landmarks and rock outcroppings within Downtown. Rock formations adjacent to downtown are significant in their appearance, and help to define the character and boundaries of the downtown commercial core. These features provide a scale and context for downtown. There is a stone embankment along the western side of US 36 as it approaches the intersection of US 36 and US 34. The hillside west of the US 34/36 intersection and south of the Big Thompson River is open and undeveloped, and publicly owned. The rock outcroppings behind the Stanley Hotel are important and give context and a backdrop to the hotel. Rivers and Streams The Big Thompson and Fall Rivers are the main water courses that flow through Downtown. They converge at Riverside Plaza and continue along the Riverwalk past the Visitor Center and into Lake Estes. The Black Canyon Creek drains Lumpy Ridge from the north into Downtown, and joins the Big Thompson near the Hwy 34/36 intersection. Wildlife Wildlife, especially deer and elk, frequent the planning area. Deer and elk migrate through the Stanley Hotel area on a year-round basis and pass through to Black Canyon Creek and the west. Lake Estes 9-hole golf course Performance Park hosts popular entertain- ment for residents and guestsDRAFT 14 Neighborhood Plans Downtown 15 Historic Resources The Stanley Historic District is a distinct area within downtown. The historic significance of the Stanley Hotel and the surrounding buildings creates a setting and image for the entire Valley. The site is generally open, and slopes gently to the south. Views to the south and west are outstanding, with the background formed by the peaks in RMNP. There are outstanding rock formations located within the northwest portion of the Stanley Historic District, which add to the area’s character. The Stanley Hotel is on the National Register of Historic Places. The hotel, completed in 1909 by F.O. Stanley, is a striking building. Across the country, the facade of the hotel is recognizable, and is linked with the Town of Estes Park. View corridors, facade easements, and other legally binding steps have been taken to preserve the views of the hotel from major roads in town, and to protect the integrity of the hotel. The Park Theater building is listed on the National Historic Register , and is the oldest movie theater west of the Mississippi in operation since 1913. The Elkhorn Lodge is the oldest guest lodge in the state, and has been in operation since 1883. There are six buildings on the National Historic Register. Land Use The primary land use within downtown is commercial, including retail shops, offices and restaurants. In the outlying area, there is the Stanley Hotel, Stanley Village Commercial Center, Holiday Inn and Conference Center, and other accommodations uses. Residential, accommodations, and commercial development are planned for outlying parcels within the Stanley Historic District. Commercial Core The downtown commercial core, centered at the intersection of Elkhorn and Moraine Avenue, provides a highly developed pedestrian environment with small retail stores. The streetscape along Elkhorn contributes to a lively and pedestrian-friendly downtown. Most downtown land uses are intensive and compatible with one another. Most of the downtown is fully developed. Stanley Village, is designed as a highway-oriented use, and functions well in that regard. Redevelopment of existing buildings within downtown will continue on an incremental basis. Mobility All major highways in the Estes Valley intersect downtown. These highways are US 36, US 34, and Highway 7 Congestion Having these major linkages connect within a small scale, pedestrian-oriented downtown shopping area causes severe traffic congestion during the peak summer season. This is inconvenient for shop owners, pedestrians, people in their cars trying either to enter or leave RMNP, and local merchants and The historic Elkhorn Lodge, located west of downtown Estes Park DRAFT Downtown 15 business people trying to access local needs such as the downtown Post Office. There is no other street system within the planning area, as the highways serve multiple purposes in this area. Trails A key element of what may someday be a Valley-wide trail system is located downtown. The Riverwalk provides direct access along the Fall River and Big Thompson River. The Riverwalk extends from Picadilly Square, south of the Post Office, into Riverside Plaza and continues along the river to connect to the Estes Park Conference Center. The Riverwalk connects downtown with the Lake Estes Trail via the Big Thompson River. Transit Since the 1996 Estes Valley Plan, effort has been underway to create a public transit system in Estes Park. The last several years have seen a shuttle bus system created, with the Estes Park Visitor Center serving as a central hub for this system, including connections to the Fairgrounds parking lot and into Rocky Mountain National Park. Parking Parking is a major concern downtown. The provision of ample and convenient parking to accommodate the needs of the business and other activities is key to the continued vitality of the downtown. LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE A - Accomodations 45.1 19% CD - Commercial Downtown 77.2 33% CO - Commercial Outlying 84.9 36% R - Residential (1/4 Acre min.)8.4 4% RM - Multi-family (3-8 du/acre)19.4 8% TOTAL 235 100.0% A 19% CD 33% CO 36% R 4%RM 8% Existing Land Use Summary Within Downtown DRAFT 16 Neighborhood Plans Downtown 17 The traffic and parking congestion currently focused in downtown must be resolved in order to maintain a positive image of Estes Park to visitors and residents alike. Discussions to alleviate the parking problems range from structured parking to outlying parking and a shuttle system. In 2005, the Town commissioned a Downtown Parking Study. The study provides an inventory and analysis of parking downtown. The primary purpose of the study was to create a comprehensive and integrated system of downtown parking that provides convenient and safe parking in a cost effective manner for visitors, employees and residents that is consistent with the vision for a vibrant and active downtown. Special Considerations and Issues 1. There are many steep slopes and rock outcroppings adjacent to downtown. These add visual interest and diversity to downtown and should be preserved with view corridors. 2. An excellent river walk exists within downtown. There is the potential to extend the Riverwalk to adjacent areas as new development occurs within downtown, to create a system of integrated Valley trails. 3. Traffic congestion in downtown and entry corridors is a major problem during the tourist season. 4. At peak periods, downtown parking is inadequate and adds to traffic congestion. 5. The quality of development within the Stanley Historic District is regulated by its Master Plan. The Stanley Hotel is on the National Register of Historic Places, as well as having the designation of a property with national significance. The hotel is a landmark within Estes Valley. Redevelopment of the hotel property should be encouraged. The Stanley Historic District is located within the proposed Downtown District. However, the various parcels within the Stanley Historic District have been designated to reflect the provisions and requirements of the Stanley Historic District Master Plan. 6. Many redevelopment opportunities exist within downtown. 7. There are several undeveloped parcels which, when developed, could positively impact the character of the planning area. 8. Within the downtown district there is a wide variety of uses. Therefore, as standards for the downtown district are prepared there will necessarily be a variety of development standards, criterion and design guidelines. Downtown Development Guidelines Primary Concepts • All redevelopment shall strengthen the unity of the block as a single entity. Please refer to specific guidelines on color, horizontal elements, building heights, and facade fronts for specific details. The block is seen as an entity. • All redevelopment shall preserve the visual quality of the individual facades and careful consideration given to treatment, placement and size of signs. • Maintain the visual emphasis of each block at its corners. Renovations of corner buildings should be more elaborate than renovations of other buildings. • Franchise architecture is not allowed. Doorways • Maintain the pattern of primary building entrances facing the street. • Maintain the traditional pattern of recessed entrances. • All development and redevelopment adjacent to Fall River or the Big Thompson River shall provide access and orientation to the rivers.DRAFT Downtown 17 Windows • Maintain the pattern created by upper story windows and also their vertical horizontal alignment. • Window sizes and shapes should not be altered during renovation. New construction should use windows of similar sizes and shapes as adjacent facades so that established patterns are maintained Facades • Facades will be aligned with the sidewalk line. There shall be an 8 foot setback from the street property line for sidewalks. • Build out to side lot lines to maintain the sense of a “wall” along the street. • Maintain the similarity in building widths. The minimum street frontage and river frontage width of retail shops shall be 25 feet. • Building components should be similar in size and shape to those already in use along Elkhorn Avenue. The 100 block of East Elkhorn shall serve as the building design standard. Horizontal Elements • Maintain a variety of building heights. The primary facades should be no more than two stories high. A 36-foot height could occur only on Moraine Avenue and the north side of Cleave Street if a third floor is used for residential. • Maintain the same high proportion of glass in renovations and new construction. At least 60% of the ground level facing the street shall be transparent window surface. First floors, which have large areas of glass and small areas of opaque materials are clearly separated visually from upper floors. • Maintain the clear distinction between first floors and upper floors. Use of horizontal moldings, awnings, or sign boards to emphasize the distinction between floors. Materials & Colors • Materials used for renovations or additions should be finished in ways that are consistent with the original building. • Variety in building materials is acceptable as long as other design criteria are met; however, it is desirable to maintain the present distribution of building materials along the block. All construction, redevelopment and building facade changes shall be reviewed by the Town of Estes Park Planning Staff for color and material consistency. • Subordinate color schemes to be the composition of building elements. The colors chosen for one building should bear some relationship to other colors DRAFT 18 Neighborhood Plans Downtown 19 Wildlife is present around most of the planning area used along the block. The use of contrasting colors to accentuate architectural details is desirable. • All roof mechanical equipment shall be screened. Signs • All businesses closed during off-season months shall leave window displays in place or allow displays by community groups. • Keep signs subordinate to buildings. Signs should fit with the existing features of the facade. Backlighted plastic signs are not allowed. Symbolic logos are encouraged.DRAFT Downtown 19 E W O N D E R V I E W AVE E ELKHO R N A V E N SAINTVRAIN AVE B IG TH O M P S O N AV E WE L K HO RN A V E W W O N D E R V I E W A V E MACGREGORAVEM O R A I N E AVEA A A CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CO COCO CO CO R RM RM RM RM [0 ½¼ Miles Commercial Outlying (CO) Commercial Downtown (CD) Commercial Heavy (CH) Office (O) Commercial Multi-Family Residental Two Family: 27,000 sqft min. (R-2) Multi-Family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) Residential: 1/4 acre min. (R) Residential: 5000 sqft min. (R-1) Single Family Residental Rural Estate: 10 acre min. (RE-1) Rural Estate: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) Estate: 1 acre min. (E-1) Estate: 1/2 acre min. (E) Accomodations (A) Accomodations (A-1) Accomodations Industrial Restricted Industrial (I-1)DRAFT 20 Neighborhood Plans Neighborhood Plans North End Natural and Scenic Resources Topography The Topography within the North End planning area can be characterized as gently rolling, with several natural drainages dispersed throughout the area. The area generally consists of open meadows, with a steeper, wooded landform in the center. The portion of the North End which is to the east of Dry Gultch Road consists of heavily forested mountainous terrain. The established Stanley Heights subdivision is forested and rolling. The western portion of the planning area consists of MacGregor Ranch, which includes open meadow areas bordered by steeply sloping and forested hillsides. Lake Estes forms the southern boundary of the planning area. Lake Estes is currently used for recreational activities such as boating, sail boarding, and fishing, and is a prominent landmark for people arriving in Estes Park from US 34 and US 36. The elevation within the North End ranges from 9,000 feet along the northwestern boundary, to approximately 7,500 feet at Lake Estes. Rivers and Streams Several water courses lie within the boundaries of the planning area. Black Canyon Creek drains into the Big Thompson River. Dry Gulch drains the eastern portion of the planning area before draining directly into the Big Thompson River below the dam. A number of intermittent drainages flow into Dry Gulch. Rock Features Several prominent rock outcroppings are within or adjacent to the planning area. Eagle Rock, which is a large, solitary formation, is in the northeastern portion of the planning area. It DRAFT 20 Neighborhood Plans North End 21 is a landmark for visitors and residents. Lumpy Ridge, located within Rocky Mountain National Park, consists of spectacular rock formations. This ridge forms the northern boundary of the planning area, and is a visual landmark for the entire Valley. Wildlife Wildlife, found throughout the entire study area, is especially abundant within the North End. Elk and deer are very common in the area in both summer and winter. Scenic Resources As noted above, the Lumpy Ridge is a landmark of the planning area. Spectacular views of Rocky Mountain National Park (including Longs Peak) are found along Dry Gulch Road, Devils Gulch Road and many local roads. Existing Land Use Residential The primary land use within the North End Planning Area is large-lot, single-family residential development Lot sizes range from less than one acre to over 40 acres. A large area currently under County jurisdiction has been zoned for residential development with a minimum lot size of 10 acres. The majority of the land is undeveloped. However, much of the area has been previously subdivided into smaller lots. Built in 2003, Talons Pointe is the Estes Park Housing Authority’s newest rental property. MacGregor Ranch is a funtional ranch and museum, with roots back to the 1870s. DRAFT 22 Neighborhood Plans North End 23 There are small enclaves of residential development scattered within the northern portion of the planning area which include summer cabins and cabins converted to year round residences. Typically, the lot sizes are less than one acre within these areas. Commercial The commercial development along the US 34 corridor makes up a small portion of the total acreage within the planning area. The primary commercial uses along US 34 consist of commercial accommodations. Visitors to Estes Park form their first impression of the Town while traveling this corridor. On the north shore of Lake Estes is the marina. This receives extensive use in the summer, from locals and visitors. There is also a 9-hole golf course. Below the dam, there are several highway-oriented commercial uses, including commercial, recreational, a small accommodations parcel, and a manufacturer of pewter sculpture. The Eagle Rock School is located within the planning area. Physically, the impact of Eagle Rock School is minimal on the planning area. It is not visible from Dry Gulch, and the only indication of the school’s existence is the drive that accesses the property. Compatibility The land uses found within the planning area are generally compatible with one another. Various parcels zoned “accommodations” along Big Thompson Avenue lying adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Extensive development within the open meadow areas found in the North End Planning Area would significantly alter not only the visual integrity of the area, but would impact the image of the entire Estes Park area. The North End is visible from a number of locations within the Estes Valley, and the perceived openness of this area, if lost, will affect the image of the entire Valley. The redevelopment of the Lake Estes area could have a positive impact on the overall perception of the Estes Valley. All the primary transportation corridors pass by Lake Estes. Careful consideration must be given to the quality of any type of development in this area. Undeveloped Land There are numerous undeveloped parcels in the planning area, each zoned for a residential use. Only one of the undeveloped parcels is located along Big Thompson Avenue (10 acres along Elk Trail Court). Historic Resources The MacGregor Ranch is located along the western border of the planning area. The Ranch has roots back to the 1870’s, and currently operates as a functional ranch and museum. Mobility Trails The trail system around Lake Estes will serve as the hub to a Valley-wide trail system. It is centrally located, and will provide a natural Devils Gulch, as seen from the entrance to MacGreggor Ranch DRAFT North End 23 focal point for trails which can develop adjacent to the various waterways. The Lumpy Ridge and Gem Lake trailhead is located off the north side of Devil’s Gultch Road. Located in the Rocky Mountain National Park, this area is extremely popular for residents and guests alike. Public Transportation/Transit Public transportation is offered through along Big Thompson Avenue and a section of Dry Gulch Road by a public trolley. There are no public transit operations that serve others parts of the planning area. Roads There are two highways in the planning area, each in the southern portion of the planning area. Highway 34 runs along the southern part of the planning area, north of Lake Estes, while highway 34 runs just south of the Lake. These serve as the primary entrance points to Estes Park. Devils Gultch Road (arterial) spans the northern portion of the area, mainly through residential neighborhoods and farm land. Access Access for accommodations parcels along Big Thompson Avenue is generally designed to allow for safe turning movements to and from properties. The Lake Estes Trail, pedestrian sidewalks and property entrances may lead to safety concerns in some areas. The parking at the Lumpy Ridge and Gem Lake trailhead often fills during the weekend, leading to patrons parking along Devils Gulch Road. Special Considerations and Issues Key Issues 1. With the recent water and sewer line completion to serve the Eagle Rock School, a large portion of the area is developable. 2. Numerous drainages can be found within the planning area, creating sensitive wildlife habitat. These areas should be preserved from development and “setback/no disturb areas” established. 3. Abundant wildlife is found within the planning area, and design considerations should be given to maintaining and enhancing habitat, and minimizing disruption to migration routes. 4. Steep slopes exist within the planning area. Development should not be allowed to negatively impact the visual sensitivity of these areas. 5. Given that the majority of the planning area is in open meadow, it is very important to preserve existing native vegetation, and locate buildings to minimize disruption and intrusion. LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Accomodations (A)78.5 1.2% Accomodations (A-1)3.0 <1% Commercial Downtown (CD)1.7 <1% Commercial Heavey (CH)4.7 <1% Commercial Outlying (CO)302.3 4.7% Estate: 1/2 acre min. (E) 48.0 <1% Estate: 1 acre min. (E-1)275.9 4.3% Office (O)3.0 <1% Residential: 1/4 Acre min. (R)31.8 <1% Residential: 5,000 s.f. min. (R-1)9.5 <1% Two Family: 27,000 s.f. min. (R-2)28.6 <1% Rural Estate: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE)245.4 3.8% Rural Estate: 10 acre min. (RE-1) 5,136.0 80.1% Multi-family: 3-8 du/acre (RM)97.3 1.5% null 144.8 2.3% TOTAL 6,410.6 100.0% Existing Land Use Summary Within Beaver Point DRAFT 24 Neighborhood Plans North End 25 6. Uses along US 34 range from stables to commercial lodging facilities and large undeveloped tracts. The image of Estes Park will be affected by the development along this highway corridor. Future development within the area should enhance the open quality of the area, and be visibly unobtrusive. 7. Development along US 34 has allowed continuous access points along the highway, creating potentially unsafe turning movements, and creating a visually unattractive street scene. North End Development Guidelines The guidelines listed below are unique to the North End and are intended to resolve or address the various issues of the North End which were identified throughout the future land use planning process. 1. Prepare a streetscape master plan for Highway 34 and provide for Pedestrian/Bike access. • As properties along Highway 34 develop or redevelop, require construction of a Highway 34 streetscape with defined access points. • Provide for pedestrian/bike trails on Highway 34, Dry Gulch and Devils Gulch Roads. 2. Establish a procedure to either renovate or remove uses or structures to conform to the future land use plan for the North End. • Remove drive-in theater screen. 3. Protect critical natural resource areas within the North End which may be adversely affected by future development. • The natural drainageway to the North End shall be protected by developing building setback and non-disturbance criteria. (e.g., 100’ from centerline of drainageway) • That portion of MacGregor Ranch, on the east side of Dry Gulch Road, should be maintained as open space. • Development should allow for wildlife migration. Fences should reflect traditional construction and design (as evident in Stanley Heights) using natural materials. 4. Revise the Regulatory System to encourage low density, low impact development in the North End. • Develop or update standards for domestic animal density. • Maintain the low density character of the North End. • Annexations should occur through an annexation agreement between property owners and the Town. North End - Future Land Use Plan The North End Future Land Use will generally consist of low-density residential classifications and parks, recreation and open space. Some commercial and accommodation uses are identified along US 34; within these areas, access control will be an important consideration in shaping future development. Natural features such as drainage ways should provide a framework for future development. In general, impact should be minimal within these areas and the definition of specific lots, building envelopes, and access should take the natural features into consideration. Eagle Rock School, the Storer Ranch, and the MacGregor Ranch Trust properties represent significant individual parcels within the planning area. Eagle Rock and The Reserve (portion of Storer ranch) have set aside significant open space. Cluster development patterns should be utilized to enhance open space opportunities. (Cluster development groups building sites on a parcel and preserves or leaves open the remaining land. The Concept allows for savings in development and service costs and for preservation of open Space.) On the Storer Ranch property, some limited commercial or accommodations development would be suitable along US 34.DRAFT North End 25 HIGHW A Y 3 4 £¤34 RE-1 RE-1 CO RE-1 E-1 RE RE RE R RE A DEVILS GULCH RDW H I G H W A Y 3 4 LAKE ESTES £¤34 [0 1 2½ Miles Commercial Outlying (CO) Commercial Downtown (CD) Commercial Heavy (CH) Office (O) Commercial Multi-Family Residental Two Family: 27,000 sqft min. (R-2) Multi-Family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) Residential: 1/4 acre min. (R) Residential: 5000 sqft min. (R-1) Single Family Residental Rural Estate: 10 acre min. (RE-1) Rural Estate: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) Estate: 1 acre min. (E-1) Estate: 1/2 acre min. (E) Accomodations (A) Accomodations (A-1) Accomodations Industrial Restricted Industrial (I-1)DRAFT 44 Neighborhood Plans Neighborhood Plans Fall River Road Natural and Scenic Resources Topography The majority of the Fall River planning consists of a narrow canyon which forms the boundaries for the Fall River drainage as it flows from the Rocky Mountain National Park northern entrance to Downtown. The topography in the western portion of the planning area consists of a single river valley with steep walls. The valley opens up as it approaches the downtown, providing developable areas on both sides of the river. Elevations range from a high of 8,800 feet at the peak of Castle Mountain to a low of 7,600 feet along the Fall River as it enters the downtown area. Vegetation The valley slopes are heavily forested on both sides of Fall River. In the lower elevations along the river, willow, cottonwood, and other riparian species are dominant. Rivers and Streams The only watercourse within the planning area is Fall River, flowing from west to east. Rock Features Numerous rock outcroppings exist within the Fall River area, visible on both sides of the valley. Of national significance, Old Man Mountain is a large rock formation which has which has been identified as a sacred site by Native Americans. Castle Mountain is another landmark. The ridge of Castle Mountain forms the boundary DRAFT 44 Neighborhood Plans Fall River 45 between the Fall River and North End Planning Areas. The southern boundary is formed by Deer Ridge, which separates it from the Beaver Point Planning Area to the south. The western boundary includes the former Fish Hatchery property, owned by the Town of Estes Park. Wildlife Wildlife is abundant. Deer and elk migrate through following the Fall River. Bighorn sheep are very prevalent; one of their primary habitats is MacGregor Mountain. Bighorn sheep can frequently be seen on south-facing slopes along the highway. Mountain lions are also found in the area. Scenic Resources The viewsheds within the central portion of the planning area are limited due to topography and heavy vegetation. The western end of the planning area provides panoramic views from the highway into RMNP. The steep hillsides, open meadows, varied vegetation and streams create diversity which contributes to high scenic quality. Views in the eastern portion of the planning area expand once the confines of the narrow valley are left behind. The river creates a unique visual amenity within this area. The integration of bike paths or river access should be promoted when opportunities exist. Historic Resources An historically significant parcel within the planning area is the original power plant constructed by F.O. Stanley. The plant is located near the west end of the planning area, on Fall River. Several outbuildings exist adjacent to the power plant. Stanley’s original house is also located along the US 34 bypass. This property is owned by the Town of Estes Park and is on the National Historic Register. Existing Land Use Land uses within the planning area consist primarily of single-family residential and accommodations uses. Accommodations exist primarily west of the intersection of the US 34 bypass and the US 34 business loop, on both sides of the highway. The Fall River Hydro Plant was originally contructed by F.O. Stanley in 1909. The plant was taken out of service in 1982 as a result of the devastating Lawn Lake Flood.DRAFT 46 Neighborhood Plans Fall River 47 Residential Single-family development occurs primarily within the eastern portion of the planning area. Development is composed almost exclusively of single-family development north of the US 34 bypass. The area south of the bypass within the planning area is also primarily single-family residential, although there are pockets of multi- family development. Accommodations The Fall River area generally consists of accommodation development along the river and single-family development set back from these areas. Within this area, development should generally be located across the river from the roadway and behind vegetation, if possible. Lodge-style buildings should be reinforced as an appropriate development type. Fish Hatchery Site The old fish hatchery site is owned by the Town and also has the potential to influence the identity of this area. The northeast portion of the site may have some opportunities for affordable housing and in general the western portion of the property lends itself to open space uses. Compatibility The land uses found within the planning area are generally compatible with one another. This is partially due to the small scale of most of the accommodations uses, in keeping with surrounding single-family development with the scale of the valley. Care has been taken to preserve existing vegetation, which blends development into its surroundings. Undeveloped Land There are several parcels of undeveloped land zoned for commercial or multi-family use. An area of concern within the planning area is the commercial frontage in Fall River Estates. Intense development on these lots could adversely impact Fall River and the neighborhood. Neighborhood residents have specifically stated that they do not want to see highway commercial uses (e.g., fast food, convenience store). Mobility Trails The developing Estes Valley trails system will connect downtown to the Rocky Mountain National Park. The Fall River trail is expected to be complete by YEAR through cooperative efforts between the Town of Estes Park, Estes Valley Recreation and Parks District, and Rocky Mountain National Park. This pedestrian and bicycle trail currently extends from downtown, along Fall River Road to Sleepy Hollow Road. The trail will continue down Fall River Road, along Fish Hatchery Road and into the Rocky Mountain National Park near the Aspenglen Campground. Transit During the summer a free public bus system serves accommodations along Fall River Road, providing connections to downtown, and from downtown into the Rocky Mountain National Park via the Beaver Meadows entrance. Roads The main highway corridor that runs through the planning area is US 34. In the eastern portion of the planning area, the highway splits into the bypass, extending north around the downtown area, and the business loop, which passes directly through downtown. They rejoin US 36 on the eastern edge of downtown. Going west, the highway follows the Fall River and begins to climb above the river as the road nears the north entrance to RMNP. US 34 through the Fall River Planning Area is the northern gateway to RMNP. It currently presents a positive image for visitors driving through the area, due to interesting land form, forested hillsides, rock outcrops, interesting views, and sensitive development of a small scale in character with the mountain environment. While the Beaver Point Planning Area supports a US 36/34 connection, the Fall River Planning Area has expressed concern. Access Control Access to the various accommodations parcels are well identified and designed to provide safe turning movements in and out of DRAFT Fall River 47 the various properties. The parking areas are set away from the road, screened by existing vegetation, or are designed to be small enough in scale to create minimum visual impact. Special Considerations The joint development of the public/private Fall Visitor Center at the north entrance to RMNP set precedent within the National Park System. The development of a park visitor center outside the park, as part of a private development, provided benefit to the owner as well as to the Park by limiting environmental impacts within Park boundaries. A connection from the US 34 business loop and US 36, crossing Deer Ridge, has been discussed for years. This construction would have major land use ramifications for both the Fall River Planning Area and the Beaver Point Planning Area. Other key issues include: Key Issues 1. Due to the steep topography and Fall River floodplain, development opportunities are severely limited within the planning area. 2. There is potential for the downtown commercial district to expand to the west. 3. The potential for a vehicular connection from US 36 to US 34 may have significant impacts on land use within this planning area. 4. Redevelopment of existing accommodations properties, and LAND USE CLASSIFICATION TOTAL ACRES PERCENTAGE Accomodations (A)249.2 16% Accomodations (A1)449.7 29% Commercial Outlying (CO)23.4 1% Estate: 1/2 acre min. (E) 71.2 5% Estate: 1 acre min. (E-1)251.9 16% Residential: 1/4 Acre min. (R)1.0 <1% Two Family: 27,000 s.f. min. (R-2)26.3 2% Rural Estate: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE)316.1 20% Rural Estate: 10 acre min. (RE-1) 112.0 7% Multi-family: 3-8 du/acre (RM)68.4 4% TOTAL 1,569.4 100.0% Existing Land Use Summary Within Fall River A 16% A-1 29% CO 1% E 5% E-1 16% R 0% R-2 2% RE 20% RE-1 7% RM 4%DRAFT 48 Neighborhood Plans Fall River 49 new development along the river may change the character of the district, especially the drive along US 34 to the entrance to RMNP. 5. Hillside development must be evaluated to insure that the quality of the physical and visual environment is not negatively impacted. 6. Land uses along the US 34 bypass must be carefully considered to ensure that the character of the area is not lost. 7. There are wetlands within the planning area, and any new development must minimize impacts in these areas. 8. Wildlife is abundant within the planning area. Bighorn sheep frequent Fall River Road to the east of RMNP. 9. Old Man Mountain is a prominent rock outcrop within the planning area, and is a sacred site to Native American Indians. 10. It is important to maintain the vistas from Fall River Road into RMNP and from Fall River Road to Fall River itself. 11. There is an opportunity to provide a trail along Fall River from RMNP into the downtown. 12. RMNP adjoins the planning area on two sides. There is the opportunity for the Park and the Town to work closely to ensure that development within the area benefits both entities. 13. There is a concern regarding additional metal buildings along US 34. 14. An important elk migration corridor connecting RMNP with MacGregor Ranch and the North End is located within the Fall River Planning Area (Bennett property). 15. It may be necessary to modify the commercial zoning in the planning area to make potential uses more compatible with the neighborhood, and to prohibit highway convenience commercial uses. Development Guidelines 1. Develop riverfront planning, design, and architectural guidelines for the Fall River area which encourage pedestrian and wildlife ac- cess along the river while maintaining private sector riverfront accommodation uses and accessibility. • Where cooperation exists, provide for a pedestrian/bike path along Fall River, from downtown to the Fish Hatchery/ Park entrance. • Provide for riverfront accommodations which are residential in scale and present a lodge-like character. The area should present a mountain resort feeling that is compatible with the environment setting. • Develop standards that address hillside development. • Require large river setbacks. • Architectural standards (material and color) should be adopted to ensure that new building construction blends with the environment. • The scenic backdrops of Old Man Mountain and Castle Mountain need to be protected. • Prohibit new highway convenience commercial uses (e.g., fast food, convenience, gas, etc.). 2. Develop wildlife mitigation standards. • Critical habitat and migration corridors include the river system, the University of Northern Colorado property, the Bennett property, and the southern portion of the old Fish Hatchery property. 3. Develop a detailed streetscape master plan for the Fall River Corridor and potential by- pass. The Della Terra Mountain Chateau, located at the Fall River Road entrance to the Rocky Mountain National Park.DRAFT Fall River 49 • A new RMNP entrance should be appropriately scaled. • By-Pass connection between Highway 36 and 34 is needed. • Commercial uses should not be extended beyond their current existing locations. Potential for future highway convenience commercial (e.g., fast food) should be eliminated. • Prohibit metal buildings and non- residential uses in E-Estate. • Rezone highway commercial areas to a new accommodations district. • Phase out Bed & Breakfast uses in the E-Estate district if they quit operation (e.g., let business license expire.) • Provide zoning standards and districts that encourage redevelopment of the area between downtown and the By- Pass. In some cases, this area should redevelop as high density housing— small lot single family and high density multi-family. • Development along Fall River should leave the area between the river and highway open and unbuilt. • Create a special sign standard for the Fall River corridor which limits signage to low monument signs consisting of natural materials (wood, stone). • Don’t allow proliferation of night lighting. Regulate/control lighting standards for both public right-of-way and private property. Provide allowances for clustering or P.U.D. approach so that sensitive land forms may be protected. Fall River Future Land Use Plan The Fall River Planning area includes US 34 bypass, or Fall River Road, which acts as the secondary access to Rocky Mountain National Park. This area generally consists of accommodation development along the river and single-family development set back from these areas. Within this area, development should generally be located across the river from the roadway and behind vegetation, if possible. Lodge-style buildings should be reinforced as an appropriate development type. The river creates a unique visual amenity within this area. The integration of bike paths or river access should be promoted when opportunities exist. The old fish hatchery site is owned by the Town and also has the potential to influence the identity of this area. The northeast portion of the site may have some opportunities for affordable housing and in general the western portion of the property lends itself to open space uses.DRAFT 50 Neighborhood Plans Fall River 51 F A L L RIVERR D WWONDERVIEW AVE MACGREGORAVEW E L K H O R N A V E A A A A A A A A A-1 A-1 A-1 A-1 E EE E E E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 E-1 R R-2 RE RE RE RE RE-1 RM RM RM RM £¤34 £¤34 [0 1½ Miles Commercial Outlying (CO) Commercial Downtown (CD) Commercial Heavy (CH) Office (O) Commercial Multi-Family Residental Two Family: 27,000 sqft min. (R-2) Multi-Family: 3-8 du/acre (RM) Residential: 1/4 acre min. (R) Residential: 5000 sqft min. (R-1) Single Family Residental Rural Estate: 10 acre min. (RE-1) Rural Estate: 2 1/2 acre min. (RE) Estate: 1 acre min. (E-1) Estate: 1/2 acre min. (E) Accomodations (A) Accomodations (A-1) Accomodations Industrial Restricted Industrial (I-1)DRAFT Page 1 of 4 To: Community Development/Community Services Committee Town Administrator Lancaster From: Alison Chilcott, Community Development Director Date: June 27, 2013 RE: Community Development Monthly Report Background: BUILDING SAFETY: Promote a safe built environment to (1) minimize loss of life and injury to the general public and emergency responders; and (2) reduce property damage and destruction.  Permits. Building permit reports are attached. Year-to-date number of permits issued is down 5%, however, valuation is up 36% and fees collected is up 23%. The Multi Purpose Event Center (MPEC) is a significant project under construction that isn’t listed on building permit reports. The project is valued at $3.8 million. The permit has been issued; however, projects aren’t listed on the report until fees are paid. Light and Power and Water fees have been deferred pending a report from staff and decision by Trustees about how to handle fees. Building permit and plan review fees of approximately $25,000 have been waived. Also, the Stall Barns permit was issued during the week of June 17th.  Outreach. The Town and Fire District jointly prepared a press release about Building Safety – Building Safety is a Cooperative Effort. On June 20th, staff hosted an informal program Building a Safer Community – Simple Steps to Improve Building Safety. Attendance was small (2 people). This program will not be repeated in the same format in future years.  Courtyard Shops. Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official and Marc Robinson, Fire Marshal continue to work with Steve Carlyle, Courtyard Shops property owner, his architect and contractors. Given the distressed state of the building, the owner is finding many hidden problems. When the owner finds problems, he is correcting them, and pulling appropriate permits and obtaining inspections when needed. The restaurant remodel is continuing. The owner uncovered serious electrical issues in the restaurant and has completed significant electrical improvements, including installation of a new service panel. An alcohol bar is now planned on the deck. Units initially planned as long-term residential will now be short-term residential (stays of 30 days or less). A revised code analysis will be prepared for staff review prior to permitting. Construction of the riser room is planned and sprinkler plans are Community Development Memo Page 2 of 4 expected to be submitted to the Fire District next week. While progress has been slower than everyone would have liked, the progress is good progress. ADDRESSING: Enhance public safety through the easy and rapid location of properties by law enforcement, fire, rescue, and emergency medical personnel within the Town of Estes Park.  No update. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: Minimize death, injury, and losses to public and private property due to flooding.  NFIP Changes. Will Birchfield is monitoring changes to the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and possible impacts to our community, and evaluating what staff should do in response to changes. This will be reported on in more detail next month. For Trustees interested in reading about NFIP changes now, information can be found at www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program/flood- insurance-reform-act-2012 SIGNAGE: Protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public by (1) ensuring the signage is safe and (2) is compatible with adjacent land uses and the total visual environment of the Estes Valley.  Sign Code Revisions. Over the past couple years, staff has become increasingly aware of issues related to the 2010 revised sign code. In staff’s opinion Sign Code revisions are needed to improve usability. This is a separate report item at the June Community Development/Community Services meeting. ESTES VALLEY LONG RANGE MASTER PLANNING: Create more convenient, equitable, healthy, efficient, and attractive places for present and future generations. Articulate a desired future to inform decision-making today.  Staff and the Estes Valley Planning Commission continue to work on Comprehensive Plan modernization. Rough drafts of revisions can be found at www.estes.org/ComprehensivePlan. Staff will report monthly to the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners on revisions leading to adoption of a modernized plan by the end of 2013. Staff is implementing Option 2 as directed by Town Board and Planning Commission in November 2012. This does not involve policy changes. This is a separate report item at the June Community Development/Community Services meeting. PLANNING FOR THE PRESENT: Provide for the coordinated and harmonious development of the Estes Valley, which will, in accordance with present and future needs, best promote health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare, as well as efficiency and economy.  Development Applications. Development applications under review can be viewed at www.estes.org/CurrentApplications. This list is lengthy.  Customer Guides. Senior Planner Dave Shirk continues to develop and improve customer guides to describe review processes and requirements. Page 3 of 4 The Development Review PowerPoint presentation shown to Trustees on June 11th will be improved and used as a training/orientation tool for new Planning Commissioners.  The Rocky Mountain Performing Arts Center EPIC board members and consultants held an informational meeting with staff and affected agencies on June 14th. Approximately 25 consultants attended, with a wide range of expertize including theater design, river modeling, construction and construction staging and management. A couple days prior to the meeting, EPIC requested the meeting be open to the public. The meeting was also opened for the Mayor, Trustees, Planning Commissioners, and Board of Adjustment members. Approximately 30 people listened to the presentation, in addition to staff and affected agencies. Staff have a much better understanding of project scope and can begin to outline development application submittal requirements. This is not a quasi-judicial application at this point. EPIC is in early planning stages. Staff anticipates that when development applications are submitted they will include: a lot consolidation plat, special review application, and height and setback variance application. NUISANCES: Eliminate nuisances detrimental to the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the citizens, on private property within the Estes Valley, such as waste accumulation, unsanitary conditions, and noxious weeds.  Weeds. Alison Chilcott and Phil Kleisler participated in the June 15, 2013 Community Weed Pull. In addition to helping raise awareness of problems created by noxious weeds and helping reduce weeds in high priority areas, it was a great learning experience for staff and chance for staff to develop working relationships with RMNP counterparts. Staff are now working on a weed map to better identify high priority areas. The Woodland Heights is one of those high priority areas, given its proximity to the Park and the large amounts of disturbed land due to re-building after the fire.  Lights. Staff continue to explore options to raise awareness of dark skies and dark sky lighting and are likely to discuss the issue at an upcoming Association for Responsible Development (ARD) meeting, at ARDs request. Phil Kleisler, Code Compliance Officer/Planner, sent a Notice of Violation to Lake Estes Resorts for violating Estes Valley Development Code Section 7.9 Exterior Lighting. Glare from the lights is extreme. Light reflects of Lake Estes and impacts many residents valley-wide. If the violation is not corrected within 15 days, a summons and complaint into court will be issued.  Outreach. Outreach is ongoing. Phil Kleisler will spend an afternoon downtown introducing himself to business owners/operators. Page 4 of 4 ADDITIONAL UPDATES Board and Commissions  Pete Smith has reapplied to serve on the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment. His term expires May 31, 2013.  At the June Planning Commission meeting, Betty Hull was elected Chair and Kathy Bowers, Vice-Chair. Staff and the commission have renewed their efforts to work as a team, following resignation of former Commissioner John Tucker and Joe Wise last month. Interaction has improved significantly. Woodlands Heights Fire  On May 21st, Planning Commission recommended approval of a Woodland Heights Rebuilding Program and on June 17th the County Commissioners approved the program. It will be in front of Town Board for action on June 25th. Owners of legal nonconforming buildings or structures destroyed by the Fire have one year to obtain a building permit to rebuild the same nonconforming structure. Staff recommended that this one-year period, which expires in June 2013, be extended to July 30, 2015; this extension concludes on the same date as the Larimer County High Park Fire Rebuilding Program. Technology  Community Development operates with no development review software, with building permit software from a now defunct business that is too old to install on new computers, and a code compliance database that is currently being debugged and suffered a significant data loss. With the increase in development activity, it is becoming increasingly difficult to operate without the aid of development review and permitting software. Last week staff, including Alan Fraundorf in IT, met with Larimer County Planning and Building Services Department about a new system they are purchasing after extensive research and RFP process; Energov (www.energov.com). If the Town partners with the County, we will benefit from best-of-breed software, that is web based, GIS centric, and on the cutting edge for a low cost. Staff will learn more about Energov at training in Larimer County next week. Leading up to 2014 budget study sessions staff will estimate costs to partner with Larimer County and purchase seats (licenses). Software would enable not only Community Development, but other departments to better manage development review, including tracking conditions of development plan and building permit approvals.  Staff are researching ways to simplify management of public comment in preparation for EPIC and other large scale developments. Finances  Year to date revenue exceeds projections and expenses are below budget for both Building Safety (2300) and Planning (1600). Building Division is close to spending the yearly budget on consulting services of approximately $24,500. We will scale back on consulting to assist with records management.