Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board Study Session 2019-03-12Tuesday, March 12, 2019 5:30 p.m. – 6:45 p.m. Rooms 202/203 5:15 p.m. - Dinner 5:30 p.m. Downtown Estes Loop Update. (Project Technical Advisory Committee) 6:00 p.m. Follow up of Facilitated Listening Session with Contractors. (Board Discussion) 6:15 p.m. Town Administrator Replacement Process. (Board Discussion) 6:35 p.m. Trustee & Administrator Comments & Questions. 6:40 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Items. (Board Discussion) 6:45 p.m. Adjourn for Town Board Meeting. Informal discussion among Trustees concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this meeting at approximately 5:00 p.m. AGENDA TOWN BOARD STUDY SESSION 1       2 PUBLIC WORKS Report To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Greg Muhonen, PE, Public Works Director Project Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Date: March 12, 2019 RE: Quarterly Update on Downtown Estes Loop Project (DEL) Objective: Update the Town Board on the progress and activities that have taken place on the Downtown Estes Loop Project (DEL) since the December 2018 Town Board Study Session. Present Situation:  Right of Way: Offers for all seven of the full acquisitions have been made to property owners. Negotiations are ongoing and three property owners have agreed to purchase terms and the property closing is complete or underway. The Transportation Commission approved CDOT’s request for authorization to condemn three parcels at the December 13 meeting. One parcel owner has subsequently agreed to accept CDOT’s final offer. CDOT will ask the Transportation Commission to authorize condemnation on a fourth parcel at the March 21 meeting.  Consultant relocation agents have been meeting with the tenants and owners who will be relocated to discuss specifics and the process of each relocation.  Design: The primary design focus over the last couple months has been centered on finalizing the landscape design, intersection markings, wayfinding signage, and miscellaneous details at the roundabout.  Hydraulics: The Project team continues work with CFLHD, CDOT, Town of Estes Park and other regulatory agencies to determine the final approach to the analysis in coordination with the CWCB’s Colorado Hazards Mitigation Program. FEMA has indicated this project will be used to establish new nationwide floodplain review criteria for projects that require 2D modeling.  Schedule: The project schedule anticipates completion of the construction documents in 2019. Right of way acquisitions are expected to extend into 2020. Construction is expected to begin in the summer of 2021. 3  Scope Expansion: Increasing the project scope to include the Riverside and Rockwell Bridges and channel widening downstream to US36 is under evaluation if funding could be obtained thru a Federal BUILD grant application potentially submitted in 2019. The call for grant applications is expect mid-year. Proposal: The TAC proposes to continue the design and right-of-way acquisition efforts in preparation of bidding the construction work in early 2021. Advantages: The project benefits are numerous and include solutions to the Town’s downtown traffic congestion problems, reduction in downtown flood risk from the Big Thompson River, and closure to property owner uncertainty surrounding the DEL. Disadvantages: Resistance can be anticipated from some community member who do not support the DEL. Action Recommended: n/a Finance/Resource Impact: The Town remains obligated to pay a local match in the amount of $4.2 million. This money was provided to the Town by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) in 2015 and obligated for payment in the amended 2018 budget. To date, $2,264,767 has been spent by the Town on this project. Additional project costs have been incurred by CDOT and Central Federal Lands. Level of Public Interest The known level of public interest in this item is high. Attachments: Preliminary copy of consultant presentation slides 4 Draft Presentation subject to change. Downtown Estes Loop Project Estes Park Town Board Study Session March 12th, 2018 Draft Presentation subject to change. Today’s Agenda • Right-of-Way Update (CDOT) • Recent Activities – Hydraulics Update – Roundabout Review • Project Schedule •Q&A 5 Draft Presentation subject to change. Project Phasing – Phase 1 • Funded Phase 1: • Reconstruction and realignment of Riverside Drive • Reconstruction of the Ivy Street Bridge • New and Coordinated traffic signals with Riverwalk • Associated transportation improvements along Elkhorn and Moraine • New on street bike lane on Moraine and Riverside • Continuous sidewalks along entire Loop • Channel Improvements between Ivy St and Rockwell St • Wayfinding signs, parklands • Does not include: • Rockwell and Riverside Bridges • Relocation of Public Restroom • Downstream Floodplain Improvements Draft Presentation subject to change. Right-of-Way Update 6 Draft Presentation subject to change. Right-of-Way Acquisitions Process • CDOT is the lead agency for Right of Way (ROW) Acquisition on the Project • Process follows Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Uniform Act). • CDOT in process of 7 property Acquisitions • CDOT is assisting property owners and tenants who require Relocation – Initial consultation with all property owners (7) and rental tenants(~13) has occurred. Relocations in process X X XXX X X Draft Presentation subject to change. Summary of Right-of-Way Acquisition Process • CDOT Transportation Commission (TC) Approves Right of Way Plans • Notice of Intent (NOI) of Acquisition sent to Property Owner • CDOT Appraisal –IF Owner chooses they complete their own appraisal (paid by Project) • CDOT Independent Review of Appraisal(s) –IF Owner provided appraisal, review is complete of both appraisals • CDOT completes Fair Market Value (FMV) • CDOT presents Offer to Property Owner • Property Owner Reviews Offer –IF Owner Disagrees,THEN they can present Counter Offer • CDOT presents Counter Offer or issues Final Written Offer –IF Owner does Disagrees with Final Written Offer and negotiations have stalled,THEN CDOT initiates CONDEMNATION Process (with TC approval) –IF Owner Agrees,THEN CDOT starts Closing process • CDOT completes Closing and Owner receives $$ 7 Draft Presentation subject to change. Status of Right-of-Way Acquisitions & Relocations • CDOT has initiated 7 full property acquisitions and 20 relocations – All offers, based on Fair Market Value from appraisals, have been submitted to property owners • Three (3) property owners have Agreed to price, closing is in progress or complete • Three (3) properties in Condemnation process. Negotiations continuing (Note: It is possible to settle during condemnation process) • One (1) property entering Condemnation process. Negotiations continuing. – Relocations in process (looking for replacement properties, estimating move expenses) • Several tenant relocations complete (to new rentals or new home purchases) Draft Presentation subject to change. Update on Properties in Condemnation • One (1) property entering condemnation process – CDOT TC will authorize condemnation at March meeting • CDOT TC authorized CDOT to initiate condemnation process for Three (3) properties in mid-December – Two (2) properties working with CDOT Attorney General Office on possession and use agreements, protective rent agreements and other items in the process • Negotiations continue • Relocation for owner and tenants continue at these properties – One (1) property has Agreed to CDOT’s Final Offer and Closing Process has begun (No Condemnation) • Through relocation activities Property owner found relocation property and is in process of purchasing new property 8 Draft Presentation subject to change. Hydraulic Analysis • Expand final hydraulic analysis model to include the full EA Proposed Action – Includes modeling bridge replacements at Ivy, Rockwell and E. Riverside and Downstream Channel improvements from E. Riverside to US 36 • Use of full Proposed Action hydraulic modeling to confirm best Ivy Bridge configuration – two span vs. single span Draft Presentation subject to change. Roundabout Review • Peer Review of Roundabout Design – Geometric review – Pavement marking – Signing review • Design Team is reviewing initial comments and making revisions for CFLHD, CDOT and Town review 9 Draft Presentation subject to change. Project Schedule (Phase 1) Draft Presentation subject to change. Near-Term Next Steps • Complete Final Design – Finalize Hydraulic Modeling – Finalize Revisions to Roundabout – Meetings • Continue Right of Way Acquisition – Develop schedule for Building Removals • Finalize Utility Relocation Plans and Schedule • Final Design Plans (Spring/Summer 2019) • Town Board Updates 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Randy Hunt, Community Development Director Travis Machalek, Assistant Town Administrator Date: March 12, 2019 RE: Follow up of Facilitated Listening Session with Contractors The Town Board of Trustees held a facilitated listening session with local building contractors, design professionals, and the public on Tue., Feb. 26, 2019, from 4:00 to 6:00 pm in Rooms 202/203 Town Hall. Summary notes of the comments and discussion were taken by staff:  Attachment 1 is a transcription of the wall-chart notes taken by Executive Assistant Suzanna Simpson and posted in front of the room during the session;  Attachment 2 consists of notes taken by Community Development Director and Acting Chief Building Official Randy Hunt during the session. The video/audio of the meeting is also available on the Town’s YouTube channel for that date. Staff believes this was a positive meeting overall. Many concerns about the Building division’s practices were aired. Nearly all were accompanied by suggestions for positive change, and expectations for a better future for the division and its stakeholders. Staff would group and summarize the themes from the meeting as follows, in no automatic order:  A new Chief Building Official needs to be confirmed as soon as possible;  That individual needs to be given time and resources to succeed;  Other resources – including money and staffing – must be provided;  Although our adopted Codes need attention, the primary issue is not the codes themselves; it is process in the division;  Plan Review in particular is a process that needs attention and improvement;  The time lag between steps in Plan Review runs too long;  Third-party reviewers for Plan Review is not a solution for many practical reasons; Plan Reviews should be in-house to the extent feasible; 11  Other reviewing departments and agencies, and lag times in those reviews, contribute to the bottleneck and lead to delays;  Additional resources for the division overall are needed. Staff can report the following steps toward fixing these matters:  A CBO preferred candidate has been interviewed, in interested is us and vice- versa, and at this writing (Thu., Mar. 7) negotiations are underway. If all continues well, we expect this position to be filled in April.  SAFEBuilt CO LLC is now under contract to conduct performance reviews, including detailed process examination and benchmarking – see Attachment 3 for their scope of work. Cost of this contract is not-to-exceed $10,500. The first in-depth site visit by SAFEBuilt is Thursday, Mar. 14, 3 pm to 5 pm. We will be getting regular progress reports from them, with a final report due and presentation (by staff) to Town Board in July.  Acting CBO Hunt has begun streamlining processes and facilitating change. Most are small and incremental, but should have a cumulative effect. My guiding philosophy on such matters (as in many things) is “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.” No doubt Town Board has additional information, perhaps since the Feb. 26 listening session, that will provide more insight. Staff awaits direction on further steps toward improvement. Attachments: 1. SUMMARY OF MEETING WITH TOWN BOARD, FEBRUARY 26, 2019 [transcribed from wall charts] 2. Building Priorities [Randy’s notes] 02/26/2019 3. Exhibit A from SAFEBuilt CO Contract: executed Feb. 27, 2019 12 ATTACHMENT 1 [Town Board SS: 2019-03-12]    SUMMARY OF MEETING WITH TOWN BOARD, FEBRUARY 26, 2019  [transcribed from wall charts]  Town Board:   Process works/doesn’t work   Policy/Administration‐partnership with builders   Make things easier/more efficient   Customer Service   Future‐focused/outcomes    Building Community:   11 months   Everyone should attend meeting   Staff missed deadlines   Documents not distributed   Conflicting information between town/county   Staff turnover   Permits not timely   Late notice on new requirements   Plan reviews   Submitted comments not passed on   Discrepancies in fees and fines   Valuations incorrect   Different valuation method‐better explanation   Delays=rising construction costs   Disregard to timeliness‐key point   Penalized, punitive, vindictive   Third party delays, inconsistencies with plan requirements   Stakeholder inclusion   Bewildered by submittal requirements   No public review   New codes‐too many code changes (IBC)   Minutiae on drawings  13  Local amendments/interpretation   Local control/governance   Higher snow/wind loads   Chief Building Official and Administrator   Lost projects/business   3rd party consultants nitpicking to prove they are doing their job   How to get flexibility back vs exactly as drawn.  Expedite small changes   ELECTED OFFICIALS‐PRIMER ON PROCESSES   Educating contractors and designers on new codes   Process flow chart: steps, fees, timelines   How to agree on ONE process   Building department flailing, no structure, high turnover   Strain on the industry   Can’t talk about performance of building department without CBO; need time to  succeed   Need the most flexibility in site work   3rd party plan checkers are completely abstract; think they are doing their job with a  long list of comments   Adopt building codes every 6 years, not every 3 (be in synch with county or just every 6  years?)   Board of Appeals and Advisory Committee redundant?   Stay focused on new codes for life safety   Getting a Certificate of Occupancy; other departments hang us up: planning, zoning,  public works   Need them to pay attention   Business licenses‐timing with CO   Better coordination of all Town departments to get the CO   People can’t finalize mortgage without CO   Documentation process is broken   Laserfiche will improve the process   What is the mission statement that can be measured to be held accountable?   Vacation home permits taking away from dealing with core   Number of requests for vacation home life safety inspections overwhelming Building  Inspector, he is overbooked with these   Board has the power of the purse and this department needs support.  Larimer County  has over 40 people   Staffing needs to be addressed    14 ATTACHMENT 2 [Town Board SS: 2019-03-12] Building Priorities  [Randy’s notes]      2/26/19   Multiple rounds of reviews – moving targets each round   New comments on 2nd and subsequent reviews   Changes in previous comments/requirements (more detail, etc.)   3‐year code cycle difficult to keep up with   Energy Code (IEEC) especially hard; many changes   IEEC does not reflect local conditions in mountains   Wind and Snow loads ‐ bigger burden with no prescriptive solutions   Review times per step   Review steps   [Thomas B issue re 100 W Elkhorn]   Prioritize later‐round review with small changes   Educating elected officials necessary   Flow chart (?)   Codes not the problem; it’s process   Need CBO   New CBO needs room to succeed   Much of need for flexibility is site conditions; less so for construction materials and  methods   3rd party plan reviews ‐ weaknesses:   Reviewers do not know local conditions   Multiple/ different reviewers on successive rounds (“justifying their jobs”)   Other departments and agencies are bottlenecks   Public Works cited   Light and Power, Water are good   Vacation Homes are time consuming – rethink necessity, priority   $$$: TB has “the purse”   Staffing needed  15         ATTACHMENT 3 [Town Board SS: 2019-03-12] Exhibit A from SAFEBuilt CO Contract: executed Feb. 27, 2019   EXHIBIT A – LIST OF SERVICES AND FEE SCHEDULE      PROCESS IMPROVEMENT – ESTES PARK, COLORADO    A. Scope of Work  Review current business practices and provide recommendations for efficiencies and process  improvements that can be made to the Estes Park permitting process.  1) Permit Processing/ routing   2) Plan Review  3) Inspection scheduling, routing, process  4) Process Mapping   5) Forms and Documents  6) Identify Redundancies  7) Workflow metrics and tracking  8) System of record review  9) CO, TCO, License, etc. processes  10) Document Management  11) SOPs, Templates  12) Reports    B. Time of Performance  Services will be performed during normal business hours excluding Municipal holiday.  1) Discovery‐ 40hrs  2) Documentation/ Reporting‐ 20hrs  3) Presentation‐ 4hrs  4) Follow‐up/ Implementation Plan‐ 20hrs    C. Project Fee Schedule  1) Hourly rate:  $125.00  2) Mileage: Current Federal Rate  3) Not to exceed $10,500.00    16 Administrative Services Report To: Honorable Mayor Jirsa Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Lancaster From: Jackie Williamson, Director Date: March 7, 2019 RE: Town Administrator Replacement Process Objective: To determine the recruitment process to be used in the search for a new Town Administrator. Present Situation: Town Administrator Lancaster provided the Town Board with his 6-month notice at the February 26, 2019 Town Board meeting. His official last day will be September 6, 2019. Mayor Jirsa, Town Attorney White and Director Williamson discussed briefly any legal issues, statutory requirements and timing during a recent conference call in an effort to bring forward a proposal for the Board’s consideration. The intent is to have a new Town Administrator identified and on staff to provide a month or two of overlap prior to Lancaster’s final day. Proposal: To contract with ESM Consulting Services, Inc. to complete a full recruitment process. Please see the attached proposal for more details on the process recommended. Staff has worked with the consulting firm since 2013 to completely overhaul the Town’s compensation plan, annual compensation market analysis, HR strategic plan development and other day-to-day HR assistance. The firm has a strong understanding of how the Town functions, the Town’s culture, and a good relationship with the Leadership team and HR staff. ESM has successfully conducted other local searches for high level positions, most recently for the Estes Park Housing Authority Executive Director. The proposal can be customized to meet the needs and timing of the Town Board. With Board agreement to move forward with ESM Consulting Services, the proposed timeline would consist of the following:  Develop hiring brochure no later than March 31, 2019  Advertise position during the month of April 2019  Prepare final recommendations for the Board by May 15, 2019  Conduct onsite interviews with top candidates no later than May 31, 2019  Announce finalist list as required by statue during the first half of June 2019  Board to make selection at second Board meeting in June 2019  Onsite no later than the end of July 2019 The Board should be advised the above timeline leaves little room for additional processes such as an RFP for consulting services. An RFP process would likely take a month or longer to complete. Advantages: 17 Contracting with EMS would allow the Town the ability to move forward with the search and allow the new Town Administrator to start prior to Lancaster’s retirement. Disadvantages: An RFP may present the Board with other firm options to complete the search. Action Recommended: Staff recommends contracting with ESM Consulting Services to complete the recruitment process for the Town Administrator. Finance/Resource Impact Up to $11,500 for the outlined proposal and any additional cost for candidate travel expenses. Level of Public Interest. Medium. Attachment. ESM Consulting Services, Inc. Proposal 18 ESM Consulting Services, Inc. Human Resource, Compensation and Training Services for the Public and Private Sectors PO Box 3505, Centennial, CO 80161 www.esmconsulting.net 303.995.4405  303.730.9870 (fax)  eric@esmconsulting.net   Town of Estes Park Town Administrator Recruitment Assistance Submitted by: Eric Marburger, President Laurie Graves, Senior Consultant 19 Town of Estes Park Town Administrator Recruitment Assistance ESM Consulting Services, Inc. March 2019 Background The Town of Estes Park contacted ESM Consulting to seek assistance and guidance in their upcoming recruitment for a new Town Administrator. The Town’s current Administrator, Frank Lancaster, is retiring during 2019 and the goal is to have a replacement on board to ensure a smooth transition. ESM Consulting has been working with the Town on a variety of Human Resources related issues since 2013. About ESM Consulting Services ESM Consulting is a small, nimble human resources consulting firm that specializes in public sector and health care human resources services. We are not a headhunting/recruiting firm. We do assist clients in the process of recruiting and selection for key positions. We do not have a stockpile of pre-sourced candidates for positions. What we have done very successfully with a number of clients is to work with the organization/governing body to advertise, pre-screen and ultimately select a candidate that best serves the needs of the organization. The following is a list of clients for whom we have provided similar services over the past few years.  Estes Park Housing Authority, Executive Director  City of Black Hawk, City Manager  City of Northglenn, City Manager  Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority, Executive Director  La Plata Archuleta Water District, Executive Director  Metro Wastewater Reclamation District, Human Resources Officer  Pagosa Area Water and Sanitation District, Executive Director  Town of Erie, Town Administrator, Multiple Department Heads Proposed Scope of Work ESM Consulting Services proposes to:  Meet with the Town Mayor and Board to: o Fully understand what is needed in the next Executive Director, o Revise the Job Description, o Understand the salary and benefits being offered, o Determine the most appropriate outlets for advertising for the position, o Identify any potential known candidates for the position, o Discuss the parameters of the search process to include paying for interviewing expenses, offering relocation expenses to the selected candidate, if needed, etc., 20 Town of Estes Park Town Administrator Recruitment Assistance ESM Consulting Services, Inc. March 2019 o Determine a timeline for the recruitment process, o Establish with whom ESM Consulting would work with and everyone’s level of authority in the process.  Create a posting and to advertise that posting in the pre-determined sources.  Receive resumes and applicants and identify the candidates that have the strongest background and relevant experiences as determined above.  Conduct phone screening interviews with qualified candidates.  Keep the Town informed of the progress at each step.  Prepare a grouping of semi-finalists for the position.  Schedule and attend interviews with the “Selection Committee” of the Town. This may be Board members, the current Town Administrator, and others as determined by the Board. o This includes drafting proposed interview questions, identifying strengths and weaknesses of candidates, ensuring compliance of the process. o It is anticipated that there could be two interviews with the finalists before a selection is made. If there is only one interview, our costs would be appropriately reduced.  Assist in any discussions to determine a consensus choice of the Board.  Negotiate with the selected candidate on behalf of the Board until the selected candidate has accepted an offer of employment (pending any employment screens/practices that the Town utilizes). Total Costs All costs include routine expenses, travel, hotel, mileage and incidental costs for ESM Consulting staff. These costs do not include any costs associated with advertising for the position, travel costs for candidates for interviews, relocation expenses, etc. Those direct recruitment costs would be borne by the Town and/or reimbursed to ESM Consulting. The services as described above would be provided at a cost not to exceed $11,540. Assigned Staff ESM Consulting would provide the following staff: 21 Town of Estes Park Town Administrator Recruitment Assistance ESM Consulting Services, Inc. March 2019  Eric Marburger, President and Senior Consultant: Eric has specialized in professional public sector human resources and compensation consulting for over 25 years. He founded ESM Consulting Services in 1999 and has performed consulting work for the Mountain States Employers Council for over 15 years. Eric served as the Director of Human Resources for El Paso County, Colorado, for the City of Hagerstown, MD and has served as an Interim HR Leader for many public-sector organizations. Eric has consulted with the Town of Estes Park for many years. Eric holds professional certifications from the Society for Human Resources Management (SPHR) and from the International Public Management Association for Human Resources (IPMA-CP); a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Hood College.  Laurie Graves, Senior Consultant and owner of Graves Consulting, LLC: Laurie holds professional designations from the Society for Human Resources Management (SPHR), the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (CEBS), and the National Alliance for Insurance Education and Research (CRM). Laurie has more than 25 years of experience in Human Resources leadership and through Graves Consulting has worked in several areas within HR. Her primary focus areas are Compensation & Benefits, HR Strategic Planning and Performance Management. She has many municipal clients throughout Colorado as well as multiple clients across the US that include municipalities, non-profit organizations and publicly and privately held organizations in a variety of industries.  Kris McDaniel, Administrative Coordinator and Technical Support: Kris has assisted a variety of executives as an administrative/project coordinator in the public sector for over 15 years. Kris specializes in project coordination, data collection and analysis, document preparation, formatting and management. Kris is an expert in a variety of software packages and would ensure that our work products meet your needs. 22                     March 26, 2019  Removing 500 Foot Limit for Liquor Licenses Tentative pending Stanley update  “Open Space” Designations on previous zoning maps  Introduction to Water Rates Study Process  Update on Film Center Plans Tentative pending confirmation from John Cullen April 9, 2019  Review of County Wasteshed Master Plan April 23, 2019  Presentation of Stanley Park Master Plan  Parking Update/Seasonal Parking Issues June 11, 2019  Downtown Estes Loop Quarterly Update September 10, 2019  Downtown Estes Loop Quarterly Update Items Approved – Unscheduled:  Estes Park Housing Authority Project on Highway 7 – Part II  Discussion with Town Prosecutor and Municipal Judge  Future of Human Resources Management  Distributed Energy Discussion Items for Town Board Consideration: None Future Town Board Study Session Agenda Items March 12, 2019 23       24