Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Park Planning Commission 2024-10-15Town ofEstesPark, Larimer County, Colorado, October 15, 2024 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the ESTES PARK PLANNING COMMISSION of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting was held in said Town of Estes Park on October 15, 2024. Commission: Chair Charles Cooper, Vice Chair David Arterburn, Dick Mulhern, Chris Pawson, Jeff Robbins Attending: Commissioners Cooper, Arterburn, Pawson, Mulhern, Robbins, Senior Planner Hornbeck, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund, Community Development Director Steve Careccia Absent: None Chair Cooper called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. INTRODUCTIONS AGENDA APPROVAL It was moved and seconded (Arterburn/Robbins) to approve the agenda. The motion passed 5-0. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL It was moved and seconded (Robbins/Mulhern) to approve the consent agenda. The motion passed 5-0. PUBLIC COMMENT: none ACTION ITEM 1. Large Vacation Home 1850 Fall River Road #5 Senior Planner Hornbeck Planner Hornbeck reviewed the staff report. The owners recently purchased the property and are seeking approval to operate it as a Large Vacation Home. The property has three bedrooms currently. Per Code (Sees 5.1.B.2.a and 5.1.B.2.b), occupancy of a Vacation Home is limited to two persons per bedroom plus two additional persons, all within the overall limitation of 8 people for a standard Vacation Home or more than 8 people for a Large Vacation Home. The applicants propose to remodel the home, within its existing footprint, to add a fourth bedroom. This would be accomplished by dividing a large existing bedroom into two smaller bedrooms. In this case, the four bedrooms would allow a maximum of 10 occupants. Staff recommended approval of the request. Owners of the other four units on the property submitted letters of approval. DISCUSSION: The items discussed were the distance of the lot line to the river, guests vs. overnight guests, parking on the street vs. property, and why a Life Safety Inspection was not needed. The background of large vacation homes was also discussed. Pawson expressed concerns that approving this request could result in a "free-for-all" of new applications. Arterburn noted that Codes are written for situations like this, and public hearings give the applicant a way forward. Applicants Gary and Sally Meyers were present for questions. They thanked the Commission for their consideration and explained the buying process for the property. It was moved and seconded (Arterburn/Robbins) to approve the Large Vacation Home application as presented, subject to the following: RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - October 15, 2024 - Page 2 1. Occupancy is limited to 10 vacation home occupants per stay. 2. The Planning Commission finds that this Large Vacation Home's location on a lot of less than one acre and building setback of less than 25 feet are offset by adequate screening and/or buffering measures currently in place. 3. Applicant shall obtain a building permit prior to construction of the fourth bedroom. A certificate of occupancy or completion shall be obtained before using the fourth bedroom or operation as Large Vacation Home. 4. Applicant shall update the Town business license and associated fees prior to operation as a Large Vacation Home, including a new in-home posting with updated occupancy and maximum number of parked cars allowed. 5. Applicant shall set up a site visit with the Sewer District and be subject to System Development Fee prior to operation as Large Vacation Home. The motion passed 4-1, with Pawson voting against. DISCUSSION: Director Careccia discussed the request to change the day and time of the Planning Commission meetings. The bylaws state that the meetings shall be on third Tuesdays at 1:30 p.m. To make this change, an action item would be brought to the Planning Commission to be adopted, then to the Town Board for a final decision. Finding new members due to time constraints has not been an issue; however, the former Chair resigned due to work conflicts. The Chair or Community Development Director could change the day on an ad hoc basis. It was noted that this should be the exception, not the rule. Arterburn favored keeping the day and time as is, and Robbins and Mulhern agreed. Therefore, it was decided not to pursue a change. Director Careccia reviewed the Development Code update. Five staff members held three consultant interviews. Evaluations are in progress, and a decision is expected by the end of the week. The Commission requested information on the Wildlife Corridor Map Survey be presented at the next meeting. There being no further business, Chair Cooper adjourned the meeting at 2:20 p.m. ^/ice Chair David Arterburn (./^^ -"•- Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary