Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board Study Session 2024-10-22 October 22, 2024 5:00 p.m. – 6:45 p.m. Board Room 4:45 p.m. Dinner ACCESSING MEETING TRANSLATIONS (Accediendo a las Traducciones de la Reunión) To access written translation during the meeting, please scan the QR Code or click this link for up to 48 other languages (Para acceder a la traducción durante la reunión, par favor escanee el código QR o haga clic en el enlace para hasta 48 idiomas más): https://attend.wordly.ai/join/FLUL-1105 Choose Language and Click Attend (Seleccione su lenguaje y haga clic en asistir) Use a headset on your phone for audio or read the transcript can assist those having difficulty hearing (Use un auricular en su teléfono para audio o lea la transcripción puede ayudar a aquellos que tienen dificultades para escuchar). Public comment is not typically heard at Study Sessions, but may be allowed by the Mayor with agreement of a majority of the Board. This study session will be streamed live and available at www.estes.org/videos 5:00 p.m. Rodeo Update. (Rooftop Rodeo Coordinator Schonholtz) 5:25 p.m. Water 102 – System Condition. (Superintendent Fredricks & Manager Wesley) 5:55 p.m. Arborist Licensing. (Supervisor Berg) 6:20 p.m. Massage Therapist Licensing. (Town Attorney Kramer & Town Clerk Williamson) 6:35 p.m. Future Study Session Agenda Items. (Board Discussion) 6:40 p.m. Comments & Questions. 6:45 p.m. Adjourn for Town Board Meeting. Informal discussion among Trustees concerning agenda items or other Town matters may occur before this meeting at approximately 4:30 p.m. AGENDA TOWN BOARD STUDY SESSION       Events & Visitor Services Report To: Honorable Mayor Hall Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Robert Hinkle, Events & Visitor Services Director Date: October 22, 2024 RE: Rooftop Rodeo 2024 Update Purpose of Study Session Item: Update on the 2024 Rooftop Rodeo. Town Board Direction Requested: Informational and no direction needed. Present Situation: The Town of Estes Park took full responsibility of producing the Rooftop Rodeo in August of 2022 after Estes Park Western Heritage, Inc. dissolved their organization. Cindy Schonholtz was hired as the Rooftop Rodeo Coordinator in January of 2023. The Rooftop Rodeo is a PRCA Rodeo with six performances held annually at the beginning of July. Proposal: No proposal at this time. Advantages: -Paid Attendance of over 10,000 -Positive economic impact for the Town Disadvantages: -None Finance/Resource Impact: No additional Budget impact. Level of Public Interest Low Public Interest Attachments: 1. 2024 Rooftop Rodeo Report Presentation WHAT A YEAR! ✓3 Sold out performances ✓Great weather ✓New ticketing system worked very well ✓Great crowds for the Behind the Chutes Tour ✓Total tickets sold: 10, 545 ATTACHMENT 1 FINANCE 2024 Revenue: $360,321 2024 Expense: $347,257 2022 2023 2024 Admissions: $219,131 $237,726 $243,046 Cash Sponsorships $67,000 $71,550 $73,000 SPONSORS ✓Record sponsorship revenue of $73,000 ✓Production, ticket office and all teams worked well to support sponsors ✓Several new sponsors including Estes Park Aerial Tram, Lasso Whisky, Air Force Special Warfare and Crocker Ranch COMPETITION ✓Rodeo was aired nightly on Cowboy Channel, Cowgirl Channel or Livestreamed on Cowboy Channel Plus ✓Fans were treated to an excellent competition ✓Bull Riding was very exciting as there were no 8 second rides until the final performance when Trevor Reiste rode his bull to win over $18,000 PARADE ✓New route this year due to downtown construction ✓Staging was easier – spectator friendly, plenty of parking ✓More than 50 entries – a great variety ✓Excellent promotion for Rooftop Rodeo and Town of Estes Park CONTRACT PERSONELL ✓We are very proud of the contract personnel that help make the Rooftop Rodeo so professional. ✓We were thrilled to have Justin Rumford back in the barrel as our 2024 Rodeo Clown – the crowd interaction was amazing. ✓Announcer Andy Seiler once again showed why he is the best in the business – accurate, entertaining and professional! VENDORS, CONCESSIONS AND ENTERTAINMENT The midway and concessions were reconfigured making the area more open, shorter lines and a wider variety of vendors. Fantastic entertainment on Friday and Saturday nights kept the crowd around. Rooftop Rodeo Merchandise was a hit! The Saloon had an expanded offering of beverages and a beer vendor on the midway – very successful! COMMUNITY ✓More than $110,000 was raised for the Estes Park Health Foundation through the Mrs. Rooftop Program. ✓More than $10,000 was raised through the Pass The Boot program benefitting these organizations: ▪Estes Park Health Foundation ▪Justin Cowboy Crisis Fund ▪EVICS Family Resource Center ▪Estes Valley Crisis Advocates ▪American Legion Post 119 ▪Flinch Forward VOLUNTEERS ✓110 Volunteers ✓Team leaders helped coordinate efforts. Teams include security, royalty, arena, production and more. ✓Volunteers met monthly starting in February. ✓The second year of the new structure was successful and the volunteers enjoyed the experience! ✓Volunteers absolutely hit it out of the park in every way! ROYALTY Our Royalty Program had a great year! We had 3 contestants for Queen, One for Attendant, 4 for Princess and Two Wranglers. Congratulations to 2025 Attendant Lily Finch and 2025 Rooftop Rodeo Queen Shar Huggins. ROOFTOP ROYALTY AROUND TOWN Kid’s Stock Horse Rodeo in Bond Park Visit to Estes Park Aerial Tram 2025 ROOFTOP RODEO July 5 – 10, 2025 LOOKING FORWARD TO 2025 ➢Continue to focus on non-profit and community involvement. ➢Restructure rodeo prize money to attract more contestants. ➢Add Women’s Breakaway Roping. ➢Expand Merchandise. ➢Larger big screen. ➢Continue to build on our strong volunteer team. ➢Expand marketing efforts. Town Board Study Session Condition and Performance of the Water System October 22, 2024 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to provide high-quality, reliable services for the benefit of our residents, guests and employees, while being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. 1 2 Agenda ▪Summary of Previous Study Session ▪State of Our Water System −Supply and Treatment −Distribution −Compliance Previous Study Session Water 101 3 4 Overall Water Division Structure Administration – Budget, prioritize, and manage; public liaison;  Town leadership representative Water Quality Lab –Sample/test water, regulatory and consumer  reporting Supply and Treatment –O&M at 2 water treatment plants,  regulatory compliance Distribution –O&M of pipeline system, storage and delivery,  regulatory compliance, development support Capital Projects –RFPs, contracts and management of general  contractors, grant and loan financial reporting  Our Water System Statistics ▪Regulated as population of >17,000 ▪Over 8,300 service connections per CDPHE ▪125+ miles of water mains and 831 fire hydrants ▪9 storage tanks, 3.4 MG, serving 8 pressure zones ▪7 MGD combined treatment capacity ▪Water quality laboratory performing >12,000 tests per year 5 6 Water Quality/Laboratory ▪Two full‐time laboratory personnel ▪Our main lab is EPA‐accredited for TOC and microbiology ▪Over 12,000 tests per year for our system and adjacent systems ▪Point of contact with regulatory agencies ▪Public notice and annual consumer confidence reporting ▪Tracks future regulatory requirements Source Water Availability Raw Water Supply ▪BOR/CB‐T Replacement Water: 500 acre‐feet ▪Colorado Big Thompson (CB‐T): 608 acre‐feet, firm ▪Windy Gap: 300 acre‐feet ▪Glacier Creek: 4 cubic feet per second 7 8 Water Treatment Glacier Creek WTP ▪Built in 1972 then upgraded ▪3 MGD (1 MG storage) ▪Only Treats Glacier Creek water Marys Lake WTP ▪Upgraded in 2011 ▪4 MGD (1 MG storage) ▪Only Treats C‐BT water Spring Summer FallWinter Water Distribution and Storage Residential, commercial, bulk water,   construction, and fire protection service ▪Hydrant flushing, valve exercising, and cross‐connection control programs ▪25‐30 miles of our pipes are shallow, older galvanized or cast iron, small‐diameter ▪Tree‐like system with higher than “typical” pressures (up to 275 psi) ▪Low winter demand results in increased water age 9 10 State of the Water System Master Planning Process Condition of Water Assets Process Electrical I&CStructural Overall Condition Review asset Interview staff Assess O&M Combine scores Validate results Condition Score 11 12 Criticality of Water Assets Criticality considers the  consequences of  failure: when the asset  does not perform or  fails. Criticality Score Regulatory compliance No. of customers impacted Duration of impact Public and Staff Safety Effect on other Assets Environmental Impact Risk Assessment  Very Poor (4-5) Poor (3-4) Fair (2-3) Good (1-2) Very Good (0-1) Very Low Impact (0-1) Low Impact (1-2) Moderate Impact (2-3) High Impact (3-4) Very High Impact (4-5) Condition Cr i t i c a l i t y Risk assessment considers the condition and the criticality of that asset (impact if it fails). Redundancy can improve the criticality or condition score, which reduces the risk of failure. 13 14 Treatment Successes  ▪Continuous improvements: GCWTP raw water valve ‐auto close on power failure Improved chemical handling at Crystal Storage GC Clearwell meter upgraded to current technology  Chlorine gas shutoff system‐Halogen valve Challenges ▪Aged infrastructure: GCWTP >50 years, MLWTP 13 years ▪Regulations – continuously becoming more stringent ▪Staff juggle between treatment methods, each plant has its own personality ▪Source water vulnerabilities require seasonal operation between plants COMPLIANT WATER Treatment Statistics ▪Finished Water Delivered  in 2024: Fully compliant155 days of operation278 Million GallonsMarys Lake WTP Fully compliant140 days of operation147 Million GallonsGlacier Creek WTP Projected 2024 Total 15 16 Condition Assessment –Treatment (AE2S) Very Poor (4-5) Poor (3-4) Fair (2-3) Good (1-2) Very Good (0-1) Very Low Impact (0-1) Low Impact (1-2) Moderate Impact (2-3) High Impact (3-4) Very High Impact (4-5) Condition Cr i t i c a l i t y Marys Lake WTP Glacier Creek WTP (2.2. 3.8) (2.8. 4.2) Risk assessment considers the condition using three areas (structural, process, and electrical/instrumentation) and the criticality of that asset (impact if it fails). For a plant-wide assessment, assets are combined to an overall score. Examples of Interim Improvements To Reduce Risk Improvements to Reduce RiskPlant •Expand/upgrade pre‐ treatment/separate coagulant & PAC feed points •Install new house water system •Additional source of supply •Separate East and West storage tanks and install baffles •Improve pre‐screen wash •Upgrade grounding and electrical systems, add UPS Marys Lake  •Rehabilitate filters, upgrade backwash process (VFD, analyzers..) •Convert seasonal winter CT to year‐round compliance point (relocate connection for YMCA & NPS) •Rehabilitate waste pond •Coat/seal clear well •Upgrade grounding and electrical systems, add UPS •Replace chlorine gas system with sodium hypochlorite Glacier Creek  17 18 Water Distribution and Storage Successes ▪Service line material inventory completed ▪O&M activities – flushing and valve exercising ▪In‐house tank rehabilitation ▪Rapid customer service for mainline repairs Challenges ▪Condition Assessment –aged assets ▪Regulatory outlook (DBPs, LCRR/I, others) ▪Old, small diameter pipes = reactive maintenance ▪Zones 2 and 3 have a storage deficit ▪“Tree‐like” system, limited looping Condition Assessment – Distribution (Water Division/AE2S) Risk assessment considers the condition using three areas (structural, process, and electrical/instrumentation) and the criticality of that asset (impact if it fails). Very PoorPoorFairGoodVery Good Very Low Impact Low Impact Moderate Impact High Impact Very High Impact Condition Cr i t i c a l i t y Strong PS & PRV Riverside PRV Fall River PS & PRV Kiowa PS Thunder Mnt PS 19 20 Condition Assessment ‐Distribution ▪Pipes, hydrants and isolation valves −Approximately 25% of the system is cast iron or galvanized −A large portion of the system is smaller than 6” Add a picture of pipe condition – CI or GALV pipe – interior or exterior Condition Assessment –Storage Tanks (Town and AE2S) RecommendationsFindings/Discussion Condition Rating*Tank Name Replace capacity. If not, recoat interior and exterior. Coatings past useful life. Tank installed in 1965 and beyond its useful lifeDCastle Mnt. – 0.4MG Replace tank with 1.5 MG of storage for pressure zone. Tank installed in 1940 is nearing end of useful life, not enough storage for zone 2CBig Thompson –0.2MG Recoat interior, coat exterior roof, repair leaksNo roof vent, exterior of roof needs coating, heavy scaling of interior shellDFall River – 125k Coat roof exterior, repair spalling, recoat roof vent, replace overflow stem supports Poor condition roof coating/spalling, poor condition vent, interior shell spallingC-Glacier Creek –1 MG Monitor tank, consider coating interior, increase storage availabilitySmall capacity tankCKiowa Ridge – 60k Coated ext. tank roof – Completed 2024Minor cosmetic cracks in exterior roofing, one more significant crackCMacGregor – 300k Capital project – isolate east and west sides, interior gate maintenance Adequate condition, can’t isolate E and W sides for maintenanceCMarys Lake – 1 MG Rehabilitated tank in 2023 with interior lining, additional roof work in 2024 Severe interior structural damage, no roof ventD-Thunder Mnt – 125k NOTE: Tank is being replaced with 0.180 MG tank (Prospect Mountain project)Prospect Mnt. *A=like new (0.5), B (1.5) C=average/functional (2.5), D (3.5) F=failing (4.5) 21 22 Condition Assessment –Storage Tanks Capital Projects Challenges ▪Extensive needs with limited funding sources ▪Community‐wide construction fatigue ▪Contractors to bid the work Successes ▪Completed: (w/Distribution) ‐Elkhorn waterline, duty house remodel, GCWTP raw water valve, water station relocation ▪Reclamation Neighborhood (w/Public Works), Prospect Mountain improvements ▪Carriage Hills & Spruce Knob: $1M DOLA grant, $2.5M BIL principal forgiveness 23 24 Discussion 25 PUBLIC WORKS Report To: Honorable Mayor Hall Board of Trustees Through: Town Administrator Machalek From: Brian Berg, Parks Supervisor Greg Muhonen, Public Works Director Date: October 22, 2024 RE: Arborist Licensing for Tree Services Providers in Estes Park Purpose of Study Session Item: Share the information obtained from private tree service providers regarding the concept of requiring tree service providers to present proof of insurance and certification as an Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), prior to receiving a business license to perform work in the Town limits. Town Board Direction Requested: Does the Town Board want staff to prepare an amendment to Chapter 5.20 of the Estes Park Municipal Code to require tree service providers to present their ISA Arborist certification and proof of insurance, prior to receiving a business license to perform this work in the Town limits? Present Situation: •As stated on the Town’s website: A business license is required for each business, occupation, or profession within the Town of Estes Park which consists of selling goods, wares, merchandise or services, the performing or rendering of service for charge, the leasing, renting or furnishing of accommodation units, and the carrying on or engaging in any non-residential business. Each business conducted at a separate location, regardless of ownership, shall obtain and maintain a separate business license. •The existing municipal code has only limited content pertaining to tree care (see the attached Chapter 8.05 - Beetle-Infested trees). Tree service providers are currently allowed to obtain a Town business license without providing any documentation of knowledge or qualifications. •In most of the Front Range communities, tree service workers are required to provide proof of insurance, ISA Certification, marked vehicles, and some version of written or field test when applying for a business license. •Proof of insurance is not currently required to obtain a Town business license. • At the July 23, 2024 Town Board Study Session, the TB asked PW staff to poll existing tree service providers regarding the potential impacts of requiring tree service providers to present proof of insurance and certification as an Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), prior to receiving a business license to perform work in the Town limits. Proposal: Prepare a future ordinance for Town Board consideration that would require tree service providers to have the ISA Certified Arborist designation and proof of insurance to obtain a business license to work within Town limits. Advantages: • Obtaining an ISA Certified Arborist credential requires three years of full-time experience in arboriculture and the ability to pass the certification exam. This process ensures that one acquires the necessary knowledge and experience to take care of trees safely and properly. • There are many native and nonnative pests that can kill a tree in Estes Park. Tree service providers should know how to properly diagnose how a tree died and how to handle its wood material, to help ensure that other trees do not become infected. • When local tree service providers were asked about their certification status (Attachment 1), a common theme of their responses was frustration with unqualified, under-qualified, or uninsured companies coming to town and providing poor service to the community. Requiring the ISA Certification and proof of insurance could alleviate this issue. Disadvantages: • Requiring this qualification would require staff time from the Town Clerk’s office, Code Enforcement, and the Town Arborist. • Enforcement of this requirement would be a challenge, and likely occur on a complaint-only basis. • A one or two-year grace period should be extended to providers to allow sufficient time for completion of their ISA certification process. Finance/Resource Impact: Unknown. Level of Public Interest Low. Attachments: 1. 2024 Arborist Questions & Answers 2. ISA Code of Ethics 3. EPMC Chapter 8.05 Beetle-Infested Trees 4. Resource Link: Fort Collins Municipal Code, Chapter 27 – Vegetation 5. Resource Link: ISA Verification Tool 2024 Arborist Questions & Answers 1.Do you currently have any ISA Certified Arborists on staff? a.If yes: How many, and what are those certifications (Tree Climber, Aerial Life Specialist, Master Arborist, etc.)? b.If no: Have you ever thought of obtaining your arborist certification? •No. •Yes : 1 ISA Certified Arborist, 1ISA Certified Tree Climber. •None, but we have a lot of other certifications: chainsaw safety, fire mitigation, and what about years of experience? 2.The Town Board is considering the possibility of requiring an ISA Certification to obtain a Town business license to perform tree work within the Town’s limits. This is standard practice in all other Front Range communities. What are your thoughts on this becoming a Town of Estes Park requirement? •We have ISA Certs, insurance, and workers compensation. Most other companies don’t and can offer work at a lesser price. •Tough question. Been in the industry for 20 years and have learned through experience. •There are so many other certifications out there; why just ISA? 3.What are some of the difficulties with obtaining ISA Certification? •Nothing, really. If the goal is safety, there are a lot of different certifications out there, 30-40. Experience is more important. •No problem. Learned a lot from the study guide that I wouldn’t have gained elsewhere. •ISA has a monopoly on the certification around here. It is better than no system at all. 4.What are some on the benefits of having ISA Certification? •Knowledge about diseases like tree rot, root health, and overall tree health. •A good bar for clients to know where you are at. A standard for safety education. 5.If certification were to become a Town of Estes Park requirement, how long would you need to obtain your ISA Certification? •Give a winter to study. •A winter season. ATTACHMENT 1 ISA CODE OF ETHICS AND AGREEMENT AND RELEASE AUTHORIZATION The International Society of Arboriculture, Inc. (ISA) is a voluntary, non-profit, professional association. ISA certifies qualified practitioners in the field of arboriculture, who have met the professional knowledge standards established by ISA. Regardless of any other professional affiliation, this ISA Code of Ethics applies to those individuals seeking ISA certification (candidates), and all individuals certified by the ISA as (credential holders). The ISA Code of Ethics establishes appropriate and enforceable professional conduct standards, and explains the minimal ethical behavior requirements for credential holders and candidates. The ISA Code of Ethics also serves as a professional resource for arborists, as well as for those served by credential holders and candidates, with respect to such standards and requirements. I.Responsibilities to ISA, the profession and the public. A. Compliance with all organizational rules, policies and legal requirements. Credential Holders and candidates must: 1.Comply with all applicable laws, regulations, policies and ethical standards governing professional practice of arboriculture. 2.Comply with all accepted professional standards related to arboriculture practice, including national practice standards and policies. 3.Provide accurate, complete, and truthful representations concerning all certification and renewal information. 4.Maintain the security of ISA examination information and materials, including the prevention of unauthorized disclosures of test information. 5.Cooperate with ISA concerning ethics matters and the collection of information related to an ethics matter. 6.Report to ISA, in a timely manner, their personal conduct that may violate any provision of the ISA Code of Ethics or the Ethics Case Procedures. 7.Refrain from behavior or conduct that is clearly in violation of professional, ethical, or legal standards related to occupational services and/or activities. ATTACHMENT 2 II. Responsibilities to clients, employers, employees, and the public. A. Responsibilities concerning the performance of professional services. Credential holders and candidates must: 1. Deliver safe and competent services with objective and independent professional judgment in decision-making. 2. Recognize the limitations of their professional ability and provide services only when qualified. The credential holder/candidate is responsible for determining the limits of his/her own professional abilities based on qualifications, education, knowledge, skills, practice experience, and other relevant considerations. 3. Make a reasonable effort to provide appropriate professional referrals when unable to provide competent professional assistance. 4. Maintain and respect the confidentiality of sensitive information obtained in the course of professional activities unless: the information is reasonably understood to pertain to unlawful activity; a court or governmental agency lawfully directs the release of the information; the client or the employer expressly authorizes the release of specific information; or, the failure to release such information would likely result in death or serious physical harm to employees and/or the public. 5. Properly use professional credentials, and provide truthful and accurate representations concerning education, experience, competency and the performance of services. 6. Provide truthful and accurate representations to the public in advertising, public statements, and other representations, and in the preparation of estimates concerning costs, services and expected results. 7. Recognize and respect the intellectual property rights of others and act in an accurate, complete, and truthful manner, including activities related to professional work and research. B. Responsibilities concerning conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety. Credential holder and candidates must: 1. Disclose to clients or employers significant circumstances that could be construed as a potential or real conflict of interest or an appearance of impropriety. 2. Avoid conduct that could cause a conflict of interest with a client, employer, employee, or the public. 3. Assure that a conflict of interest does not compromise legitimate interests of a client, employer, employee, or the public and does not influence or interfere with professional judgments. 4. Refrain from offering or accepting significant payments, gifts or other forms of compensation or benefits in order to secure work or that are intended to influence professional judgment. C. Responsibilities concerning public health and safety. Credential holders and candidates must: 1. Follow appropriate health and safety procedures, in the course of performing professional activities, to protect clients, employers, employees, and the public from conditions where injury and/or other harm are reasonably foreseeable. 2. Inform appropriate government representatives or agencies when aware of an activity or circumstance that may cause an unsafe condition or violate legal requirements. (1) (2) (3) (a) (b) (c) (d) (a) (b) (1) (2) (3) (a) (b) (c) (1) (2) (3) (d) (e) (f) (g) (1) (2) (3) Chapter 8.05 - Beetle-Infested Trees 8.05.010 - Definitions. In this Chapter, the following words shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: Destruction means cutting and chipping an infested tree; or other method of disposing of an infested tree approved by the Director. Director means the Public Works Director of the Town or his or her designated agent(s). Douglas fir beetle means the species Dendroctonus pseudotsugae. Infested tree means (i) a tree, alive or dead, which is infested with the mountain pine beetle, spruce ips beetle and/or Douglas fir beetle; and (ii) any species or variety of tree that is dead or substantially dead, and all deadwood to which the bark is still attached which, because of their condition, may serve as a breeding place for the mountain pine beetle, spruce ips beetle and/or Douglas fir beetle. Mountain pine beetle means the species Dendroctonus ponderosae. Occupant means any person in physical possession of any lot, tract or parcel of real property located within the corporate limits of the Town who is not the owner of such property. For the purposes of this Chapter, occupant does not include the owner of an easement or right-of-way across property. Owner or landowner means any person who owns any lot, tract or parcel of real property located within the corporate limits of the Town. Person means an individual, association, partnership, corporation or other legal entity. Property means any lot, tract or parcel of real property located within the corporate limits of the Town. Spruce ips beetle means the species Ips hunter and Ips pilifrons. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) 8.05.020 - Duty of landowner and occupant to permit inspection. An owner or occupant, whose property may have located on it one (1) or more infested tree(s), shall allow the Director to enter such property for the purpose of immediate inspection of the trees located upon such property when at least one (1) of the following events has occurred: The owner or occupant has requested the inspection; A neighboring landowner or occupant has reported a suspected infested tree and requested an inspection; or The Director has made a visual observation from a public right-of-way or area and has reason to believe that infested tree or trees exist on the property of the owner or occupant. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) 8.05.030 - Inspection for infested trees. Subject to the requirements and limitations of this Section, the Director shall have the right to enter upon any property, whether public or private, during reasonable hours for the purpose of inspecting for the existence of an infested tree when at least one (1) of the three (3) events described in Section 8.05.020 has occurred. However, no agent or employee of the Town shall enter upon any property to inspect for an infested tree without the permission of the owner or occupant or without an inspection warrant issued pursuant to this Section. If verbal permission to inspect the property is not obtained from the affected owner or occupant, the Town shall send written notice to the landowner and any occupant of the property advising that the Director desires to inspect the property for an infested tree. The notice shall be sent by certified mail. The notice may be sent to the landowner at the address to which tax notices are sent according to the records of the County Treasurer and to the occupant at the property address. Alternatively, the Director may personally serve such notice upon the affected owner or occupant. Where possible, inspections shall be scheduled and conducted with the concurrence of the owner or occupant. If permission to enter upon and inspect the property is not obtained within ten (10) days after the notice described in Subsection (b) of this Section has been received, or within ten (10) days of date of service if the notice is personally served, the Director may request that an inspection warrant be issued by the Municipal Court. The Municipal Court Judge shall issue an inspection warrant upon presentation by the Director of an affidavit satisfying the requirements of Rule 241(b)(2) of the Colorado Municipal Court Rules of Procedure. The Municipal Court Judge may issue an area-wide inspection warrant pursuant to this Section unless otherwise prohibited by law. In case of an emergency involving imminent danger to public health, safety or welfare, the Director may enter the property to conduct an emergency inspection without a warrant and without complying with the requirements of this Section. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) 8.05.040 - Notice of infestation and removal. If the Director determines that property contains one (1) or more infested trees, the Director shall notify the owner and any occupant of the property. Such notice shall be given either by certified mail or personal delivery. The notice shall: Advise the owner and occupant that the property contains one (1) or more infested trees; Advise the owner and occupant of Town-approved methods for the removal and destruction of infested trees; and Advise the owner and occupant that all infested trees must be removed within ten (10) days following receipt of the notice, or that an acceptable plan and schedule for removal of the infested trees must be submitted to the Director within such ten-day period. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) 8.05.050 - Abatement order. In the event the owner fails to comply with the Director's notice as described in Section 8.05.040 by removing the infested trees or submitting an acceptable schedule for such removal within the applicable ten-day period, the Town has the authority to provide for and complete the removal by obtaining and acting on an abatement order. Upon the expiration of the period of notice, or at any time thereafter, if the required action has not taken place, the Town may apply to the Municipal Court for an abatement order. An application for an abatement order shall be accompanied by an affidavit affirming that: The Director has determined that the subject property has one (1) or more infested trees; The Director has complied with the notice requirements of Section 8.05.040; and The owner has failed to remove the infested trees, has failed to submit an acceptable plan for removal of the infested trees within the required time or has failed to remove the infested trees pursuant to the accepted plan. The Town shall give notice to the owner and any occupant of the property of its application for an abatement order either by certified mail or by personal service of the notice. The notice of application for an abatement order shall include a copy of the Town's application and its affidavit in support thereof, as well as the date, time and place at which the Town will appear before the Municipal Court to request entry of the abatement order. At the stated time, date and place, the Municipal Court Judge shall review the Town's application for an abatement order, the affidavit and any statement of the Town offered in support thereof, as well as any statement and evidence presented by the owner or occupant, if present. The Municipal Court Judge shall issue an abatement order if: The subject property has one (1) or more infested trees; The Director has complied with the notice requirements of Section 8.05.040; and The owner has failed to remove the infested trees, has failed to submit an acceptable plan and schedule for removal of the infested trees within the required time or has failed to remove the infested trees pursuant to the accepted plan. ATTACHMENT 3 (h) (i) (j) (k) (a) (b) (c) An owner is responsible under this Chapter for any infested trees permitted to remain on the owner's property after the Director has given notice of a violation pursuant to Section  8.05.040. In case of an emergency involving imminent danger to public health, safety or welfare, the Town may authorize immediate removal of any infested tree without notice or an abatement order. The Town may pursue the remedies set forth in this Section with or without filing a complaint in the Municipal Court, at the Town's sole discretion. The owner shall be assessed twice the whole cost of removal of the infested trees from the property, including administrative fees incurred by the Town. If all of the costs and charges incurred by the Town are not paid within thirty (30) days of the date of the assessment, the unpaid costs shall be certified to the County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as real property taxes. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) 8.05.060 - Unlawful acts. It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Code for any owner to fail or refuse to remove all infested trees from his or her property within the time period provided for in a notice of violation sent by the Director pursuant to Section 8.05.040 of this Chapter. It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Code for any owner or occupant to deny the Director access to the property owned or occupied by the owner or occupant if the Director presents an inspection warrant issued pursuant to this Chapter. It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Code for any person to expose for sale, offer for sale, transfer, give away or offer to give away any infested tree anywhere within the Town. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) 8.05.070 - Applicability. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to all public and private lands within the corporate limits of the Town. (Ord. 08-08 §1, 2008) TOWN BOARD STUDY SESSION October 22, 2024 Massage Therapist Licensing No packet material was provided for this item. November 12, 2024 •Utility Rates for Service Areas Outside of Town •Annexation Overview •Hosted Short-Term Rentals •Purchasing: Project Delivery Tools November 26, 2024 •Paid Parking Season Overview and Future Funding for the Bighorn Parking Structure December 10, 2024 •VEP Dark Skies Initiative •Multimodal Transportation and Transit Development Plans •Liquor License Process January 28, 2025 •Scoping Project for Capacity Improvements on the Big Thompson River and Fall River Items Approved – Unscheduled: •Parking Enforcement Ordinance Updates •Curb and Gutter Philosophy •Stanley Park Master Plan Implementation Items for Town Board Consideration: •None Future Town Board Study Session Agenda Items October 22, 2024