Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPERMIT 398 Bristlecone Ct Remodel 2012-07-24Construction Type: Received Date 7 7- lof Town of Estes Park ������ Permit Number M- pp 'Expires ReceivedBy � �� �ea APp hlrcaaon cation for MYscellaneous Permit A Department of Building Safety 170 MacGregor Avenue P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 General Information & Inspection Line (970) 577-3726 * FAX (970) 586-0249 * Permit Expires Job Address: 398 Bristlecone Ct., Estes Park, Co. 80517 Owner Name:. Tom Dieffenbach Address: 398 Bristlecone Ct. ,, Estes Park, Co. 80517 (Street) (City) Phone: 860-382-8525 Contractor/Applicant: Tom Dieffenbach Town License #: Address: Street © Long-term Residential (>_ 30 days) Ci (State) (Zip Code) Phone: State Z. Code ❑ Short-term Residential (<30 days) 0 Commercial Cl Replace Furnace Cl Replace Boiler Cl Replace Hot Water Heater 0 Minor Plumbing IlMinor Remodel Cl Fireplace Insert — circle one: Gas, Wood, Cl Gas Line ( ft.) IX Replace Windows Cl Install Air Conditioning ❑ Temporary Structure Use Time Period Pellet; Cl Other st IIr), remove athroom wall to enlarge master bedroom, move bathroom to saloDescription rywith existing )1 wet 2nd floord or and deck. Remove exsisting windowsnd ug de. Removee existing (panelolar froroof and repair roof. space forplumbing permit.(2nd flr upgrade to modem bathroom fixtures, remove 3rd bathroom to make bedroom 2 larger, build bedroom 3 byadd one wall and door g dosingr of. Valuation (Total Cost of Material & Labor): $ 10,000 I certify this application is tnie and correct and agree to perform the work described according to plans/specifications submitted, reviewed and approved, and comply with local ordinances, state and federal laws as well as building codes. 1 certify that I have the property owner's authority and permission to apply for this permit. Additionally, UNDERSTAND THAT I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FEES OR EXPENSES INCURRED FOR PLAN REVIEW, PERMITS, INSPECTIONS AND OTHER FEES ASSOCIATED,. WITH THIS APPLICATION. Note: The work authorized by this permit requires the building be provided with smoke alarms complying with municipal c Signature Date 07-24-12 Print Name Tom Dieffenbach *** Office Use Only *** Inspection Checklist: ❑ Address Posted ❑ Contractors Licensed ❑ Permit Packet Available 0 Safe Access Comments: :i t 4,,111m ❑ Equipment Access ❑ Equipment Listed ❑ Equipment Clearances ❑ Pan and Drain ❑ T&P ❑ Gas Pipe ❑ Vent ❑ Combustion Air Census # Building Official Occupancy: Date 'III HIV 1, „I, Counter Page 1 of 1 Permit Fee: ❑ Smoke Detectors ❑ pkr gh Inspection C3""inal Inspection i;"i ,,� County Tax: Tot 1: � a ' Revised 3/29/2012 - CB OfgOmItomovaufam RESIDENTIAL PE IT INSPECTION RECORD JOB ADDRESS 3 9e l921S J L. .CONS CT PERMIT#l/7-jZ OCCUPANCY GROUP i4-3 CONST. TYPE Y-Q OCCUPANCY LOAD e . PRINKLER OWNER Adre4cieegaitehl CONTRACTOR Q GUN E2 PHONE g - Ss" - DESCRIPTION OF WORK /iN DR RIspjevigL THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE FROM THE FRONT OF JOBSITE AND MUST BE PROTECTED WITH PLASTIC OR OTHER WATERPROOF MATERIAL. SETBACKS FOOTING UFFER GROUND DAMP PROOFING/WATER PROOFING (FOUNDATION BASEMENT WALLS) FOUNDATION DRAIN PIPE/RADON SEWER SERVICE & UNDERGROUND OUTSIDE OF BUILDING (SAN DIST.) WATER SERVICE PLUMBING UNDERGROUND (INSIDE BUILDING) ROUGH PLUMBING ROUGH MECHANICAL ROUGH GAS FIREPLACE(,S) ROUGH ELECTRIC (STATE INSP.) EXTERIOR WALLS (VENEER) & OPENINGS FIRE BLOCKING / FIRE STOP ROUGH BUILDING FIRE BLOCKING / FIRE STOP ROOF ROUGH INSULATION DRYWALL IN PROGRESS SPRINKLER (STATE CERT INSP.) ..a. COUNTY WILDFIRE FINAL ELECTRIC (STATE INSP,. WATER METER INSTALL_�"' COMPLETED FINAL JOB C .. � ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE � REQUESTED BY CALLING 577-3731 I1Y 4:00 P.M. THE PRECEDING WORK DAY. INSPECTIONS CAN ONLY BE REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING THE WORK TO BE INSPECTED. ALL INSPECTION REQLIFSTS'M1 ST INCLUDE THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME AND TOWN LICENSE NUMBER, JOB ADDRESS, TYPE OF INSPECTI N(S), AND PERMIT NUMBER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ANY OF THESE REQUIREMENTS MAY DELAY INSPECTIONS. \\server 3lkruitdirogdept\ch\➢esprection forms, etc\iresideetiai➢ alas➢rectiouu curd..➢'oc Revpsed 06/14/2006 - CB r f JGDiivanab to C 6 uuPjpP """'" m 0 O 0 a) fj wwmummmuomkunion wuu'hn.g uo 00 00 V 1997 UBC HANDBOOK OPENABLE AREA = 5.7 SQ. FT. 14_20 IN. CLEAR 41 IN. CLEAR MINIMUM SIZE WINDOW FOR 20 IN. CLEAR WIDTH For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 square foot = 0.093 m2. 24 IN. CLEAR 44IN. MAX. 341/8 IN. CLEAR MINIMUM SIZE WINDOW FOR 24 IN. CLEAR HEIGHT EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW FIGURE 310-1 The requirement for emergency escape and egress openings in sleeping rooms is because a fire will usually have spread be- fore the occupants are aware of the problem, and the normal exit channels will most likely be blocked. The dimensions pre- scribed in the code, and as illustrated in Figure 310-1 for exterior wall openings used for emergency egress and rescue, are based on extensive testing by the San Diego Building and Fire Depart- ments to determine the proper relationships of height and width of window opening to adequately serve for both rescue and es- cape. The minimum of 20 inches (508 mm) for the width was based on two criteria: the width necessary to place a ladder with- in the window opening and, secondly, the width necessary to ad- mit a firefighter with full rescue equipment. The minimum 24-inch (610 mm) height dimension was based on the minimum necessary to admit a firefighter with full rescue equipment. It is the intent of the code that the windows required for emer- gency escape or rescue be located on the exterior of the building so that rescue can be effected from the exterior or, alternatively, so that the occupants may escape from that window to the exteri- or of the building without having to travel through the building itself. If these windows open into an interior exit court, the exit court must have an exit passageway, that provides access to the public way. As stated in the code, these windows used for emergency es- cape or rescue tnust be operable windows. The intent is that they be of the usual double -hung, horizontal sliding or casement win- dows operated by the turn of a crank. The building official should evaluate special types of windows other than those just described based on the difficulty of operating or removing the windows. If no more effort is required than that required for the three types of windows just enumerated, they could be approved as meeting the intent of the code as long as no tools, special knowledge or effort are required. OPENABLE AREA = 5.7 SQ. FT. FLOOR Window wells in front of emergency escape windows also have minimutti size and escape requirements. These require- ments were added to address those emergency escape windows that occur below grade. Obviously, just providing the standard emergency escape window criteria to these windows will get occupants through the window but the window well may actu- ally trap them against the building without providing for their escape from the window well or providing for firefighter ingress. The minimum size requirements in cross section are similar in intent to the emergency escape window criteria: that is, to pro- vide a nominal size to allow for the escape of occupants or ingress of firefighters. The ladder or stair requirement is the main difference. Emergency escape windows below the fourth story are not required to have an escape route down to grade; however, those windows below adjacent grade are so required. When the depth of a window well exceeds 44 inches (1118 mm), a ladder or stair from that window well is required. The type of ladder or stair is not identified in these provisions. However, a permanently fixed ladder as required by the Uniform Mechanical Code for access to rooftop equipment would be acceptable or any type of usable stair would suffice. Remember, these ladders or stairs are provided for emergency use and need not fully comply with the code. The ever-increasing concern for security, particularly in resi- dential buildings, has created a fairly large demand for security devices such as grilles, bars and steel shutters. Unless properly designed and constructed, these security devices over bedroom windows can completely defeat the purpose of the emergency escape and rescue window. Therefore, the UBC makes provi- sions for security devices, provided the release mechanism has been approved and is operable from the inside without the use of 39