HomeMy WebLinkAboutPERMIT 1945 Bradley Ln Demo 2011-03-15Received Date :i Town of Estes Park .CO Permit Number D_________.oP
Received B3’.Demo Application I Permit Application Expires
_________
Department of Building Safety 170 MacGregor Avenue P.O.Box 1200 Estes Park,CO 80517 —
General Information &Inspection Line (970)577-3731 *FAX (970)586-0249 *www.estesnet.com Permit Expires 0
Job Address:/fr5 it (ttj..P &‘Oi 7 Parcel #:
_____________________
Owner Name:
__________________________________Phone:
/I3Zt 5315 /2 7
Address:/7’Y4’4&jp W,iri /ioc
(Street)(City)(State)(Zip Code)
Contractor:Coi-,rL Town License #:%‘,2-Phone:9-’S77-O/7
Address:///7 Ui’,a-€2&.’L-,v.6r5 ji CL)
(Street)(City)(State)(Zip Code)
D Long-term Residential (30 days)D Short-term Residential (<30 days)C Commercial
Note:A Demo Permit does not authorize any work in or on public right-of-ways,wetlands,floodplains,or other
properties -separate additional permits are required.
Note:Separate permits required for each address,each lot,or each owner.
Description of Work $o C,uJ C,C’pk9t.1LZOLF.H PiZ.Jp-17f4t oF k-1tAJ7i,..J&J ggpc ,,,*/f4/4 /24,ijp O,ZPPAt2 9iA6 773 1A7’D’PP’ESo-/11tr/p-o/is(i12--t,LIf/Zt
Valuation (Total Cost of Material &Labor):$cc3 LIV
Inspection Checklist /Signoffs
C Sanitation District —abandon I vacate sewer
C Health Department —abandon /vacate septic
C Water Department —abandon I vacate water
C Light &Power —abandon /vacate electric
C Xcel —abandon /vacate gas
C Building Department —Final Inspection
C State Demolition PermitlOwner’s Acknowledgement Form
I certify this application is true and correct and agree to perform the work described according to plans/specifications submitted,reviewed and approved,and comply with
local ordinances,state and federal laws as well as building codes.I certify that I have the property owner’s authority and permission to apply for this permit.Additionally,IUNDERSTANDTHATIAMRESPONSIBLEFORANYFEESOREXPENSESINCURREDFORPLANREVIEW,PERMITS,INSPECTIONS AND OTHERFEESASSOCIATEDWITHTHISAPPLICATION.
C Contractor C Owner C Owner’s Agent C Tenant
Signature “—.7’::i1_f Date 3//fl Print Name 7i e3,apCe (.&5
***Office Use Only
Staff Comments:
Date
Application Information
Fee
iSSUE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION
r S .l.,4,.,,-
DS Consulting,Inc.
Asbestos Inspection and Sampling Report
1945 Bradley Ln,Estes Park,Colorado 80517
Presented To:
Mr.Jeff Briggs
Briggs Carpet Care &Restoration
1147 Willow Lane
Estes Park,CO 80517
Performed &Prepared By:
Mr.Steve Shurtliff
DS Consulting,Inc.
5366 Flatrock Ct
Morrison,CO 80465
(303)378-1544
Project Details:
Project Number:3448
Conducted:February 7,2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On February 7,2011,Mr.Steve Shurtliff with DS Consulting,Inc.(DSC)performed a limited asbestos
inspection and performed asbestos bulk-sampling at 1945 Bradley Ln,Estes Park,Colorado,in order to
identify potentially hazardous friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM)within a
portion of the above-referenced,single-family residence recently affected by a water leak.The Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment’s (CDPHE)Regulation 8,Part B defines an asbestos
con taming material (ACM)as a material containing more than 1%asbestos.
Mr.Shurtliff collected a total of six (6)asbestos bulk-samples from the following locations within the
residence:
•Drywall -Lower Level Bathroom
•Acoustical Ceiling -Lower Level Bathroom
All six (6)bulk-samples were analyzed by Reservoirs Environmental,Inc.(NVLAP #101896)in Denver,
Colorado with all six (6)laboratory results reporting as non-detect for asbestos (see Appendix B for
laboratory results).
2
PROJECT OVERVIEW
I.Introduction
A limited asbestos inspection and bulk-sampling for ACM was conducted at 1945 Bradley Ln,Estes Park,
Colorado,by Mr.Shurtliff on February 7,2011 at the request of Mr.Jeff Briggs with Briggs Carpet Care &
Restoration.Mr.Shurtliff is a Colorado State Certified Building Inspector;having EPA Accreditation
#15413 (see Appendix Bfor certificate).The purpose of the inspection was to identify,sample and assess
potentially hazardous friable and non-friable ACM within the lower level bathroom of the residence that
may be impacted by restoration activities.
II.Structural Design
The structure is a wood-framed,two-level,single-family residence with attached garage.
III.Sampling and Analytical Procedures
The inspection,assessment and sampling were conducted by an EPA and AHERA accredited Building
Inspector qualified by experience,education and training in the recognition of potential ACM and
approved bulk-sampling techniques.The asbestos bulk-sampling was conducted on suspect ACM with a
limited number of bulk-samples being collected within the residence.
The inspection,assessment and sampling were performed in accordance with Environmental Protection
Agency/AHERA recommended procedures.These procedures call for the visual inspection of the area of
concern and the collection and analysis of representative bulk-samples of suspect material.
Some minor destructive sampling was conducted.Walls,columns and perimeter pipe chases were not
broken into in order to locate and quantify suspect ACM.It should be noted that additional ACM might be
located in these and other inaccessible areas.
Random bulk-samples,representative of the suspect asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM)of
each homogeneous area (HA),were collected according to the guidelines published as Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)Final Rule:Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA),15 USC,Sections
2641 through 2654 and in compliance with 40 CFR,Part 763.Representative sampling is based on the
following criteria:
1.The distribution of the suspect material throughout the HA.
2.The suspect material’s physical characteristics and application.
3.Random sampling patterns determined for each HA.
Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered to be representative of materials in each
HA if they exhibit similar physical characteristics and the application of the sampled material can be
correlated to the application of un-sampled material.Bulk-samples collected were analyzed utilizing the
EPA’s Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R/116,July,1993)
and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as methods references.Analysis of the
bulk-samples was performed on the “date reported,”as listed in the bulk-sample analysis report.
3
IV.Notes on Report Format
Suspect materials alike in appearance and application were sampled as HAs.Suspect materials were
divided into three classifications:
1.Surfacing Material:sprayed or troweled onto structural building member.
2.Thermal System Insulation (TSI):any type of pipe,boiler,tank,or duct insulation.
3.Miscellaneous Material:other suspect materials,floor tile,sheet vinyl/linoleum,ceiling tiles,
insulation,and finishing materials.
Condition assessments were performed by the accredited inspector at the time of inspection.Condition
assessments are listed in the following section.Ratings of “good,”“damaged,”and “significantly
damaged”are meant to indicate the overall condition of the material.
A material in “good”condition has no visible damage or deterioration,or showing only very limited
damage or deterioration.
A material in “damaged”condition has the following characteristics:The surface is crumbling,blistered,
water-stained,gouged,marred or otherwise abraded over less than one-tenth of the surface if the
damage is evenly distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized).Accumulation of powder,dust or
debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence.A material in “significantly damaged”condition has one or more of the following
characteristics:
•The surface is crumbling or blistered over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized).
•One-tenth (one-quarter,if localized)of the material is hanging from the surface,deteriorated,or
showing adhesive failure.
•Water stains,gouges,or mars are over at least one-tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly
distributed (one-quarter if the damage is localized).Accumulation of powder,dust or debris
similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as
confirmatory evidence.
Response-action recommendations for asbestos-containing HAs are listed in the section vii.
Recommendations may be for more than one HA,if materials are alike.Recommendations are either
“general”or “immediate.”An immediate recommendation indicates the presence of asbestos greater
than 1%within the bulk-sample,or a bulk-sample in the same HA,arid should be addressed accordingly.
A general recommendation indicates asbestos does not exist greater than 1%within the bulk-sample,or
all bulk-samples in the same HA,and no further abatement activities are required for removal of the
material.Any sample reporting a “TRACE”amount of asbestos must be considered to be positive for
asbestos greater than 1%unless it is analyzed by the point-count method to be less than 1%.
V.inspector Comments
No asbestos-containing material was identified during the bulk-sampling conducted at 1945 Bradley Ln,
Estes Park,Colorado.A total of six (6)bulk-samples were collected from drywall and acoustical ceiling
within the lower level bathroom of the above-referenced residence.All six (6)bulk-samples tested non
detect for asbestos.
4
VI.Homogeneous Area Descriptions
The following section contains sampled HA descriptions and sample locations.Percent-asbestos content
for each sample indicated can vary depending on sample locations,homogeneity of the materials,and
type of application.The following samples were collected from the single family residence at 1945
Bradley Ln,Estes Park,Colorado,on February 7,2011.The quantities are approximations and are
subject to field verification.ND =Non-detect.
Sample #:DWO1-O1
Homogeneous Area #01 Homogeneous Area #01
Sample Description:Drywall Sample Description:Drywall
#:DWO1-02
Sample Location:Lower Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location:Lower Level Bathroom Wall
Material Classification:Surfacing Material Material Classification:Surfacing Material
Material Quantity:<1,000ft2 Material Quantity:<1,000ft2
Material Condition:Significantly Damaged Material Condition:Significantly Damaged
Layers —Asbestos Content:Layers —Asbestos Content:
White tape -ND White tape -ND
White compound w/white paint -ND White compound w/white paint -ND
White joint compound -ND White joint compound -ND
Tan/white drywall -ND Tan/white drywall -ND
Recommendations:GENERAL -See Section VII Recommendations:GENERAL -See Section VII
Sample #:DWO1-03
Homogeneous Area #01 Homogeneous Area #02
#:ACO1-Ol
Sample Description:Drywall Sample Description:Acoustical Ceiling
Sample Location:Lower Level Bathroom Wall Sample Location:Lower Level Bathroom Ceiling
Material Classification:Surfacing Material Material Classification:Surfacing Material
Material Quantity:<1,000ft2 Material Quantity:<1,000ft2
Material Condition:Significantly Damaged Material Condition:Significantly Damaged
Layers —Asbestos Content:Layers —Asbestos Content:
White tape -ND White tape -ND
White compound w/white paint -ND White foamy texture -ND
White joint compound -ND White joint compound -ND
Tan/white_drywall_-_ND
Recommendations:GENERAL -See Section VII Recommendations:GENERAL -See Section VII
5
Homogeneous Area #02 Homogeneous Area #02
iwmiSample#:ACO1-02
Sample Description:Acoustical Ceiling Sample Description:Acoustical Ceiling
Sample Location:Lower Level Bathroom Ceiling Sample Location:Lower Level Bathroom Ceiling
Material Classification:Surfacing Material Material Classification:Surfacing Material
Material Quantity:<1,000ft2 Material Quantity:<1,000ft2
Material Condition:Significantly Damaged Material Condition:Significantly Damaged
Layers —Asbestos Content:Layers —Asbestos Content:
White tape -ND White foamy texture -ND
White foamy texture -ND Tan/pink drywall -ND
White joint compound -ND
Tan/pink_drywall_-_ND
Recommendations:GENERAL -See Section VII Recommendations:GENERAL -See Section VII
Vu.Recommendations
GENERAL:
The laboratory results of the potential ACM sampled at 1945 Bradley Ln,Estes Park,Colorado,indicate
that all six (6)bulk-samples of drywall and acoustical ceiling collected were reported as non-detect for
asbestos.Therefore,no professional abatement activities are recommended to remove the above
referenced material.
6
#:ACO1-03
APPENDIX A
-r
CERTIFICATION
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
7
Rerervoir En viranm8n tal,Inc.
February 10,2011 Laboratory Code:RES
Subcontract Number:NA
Laboratory Report:RES 207351 -1
Project #I P.O.#None Given
Project Description:1945 Bradley Ln.,Estes
Steve Shurtliff Park,CO
DS Consulting,Inc.
5366 Flatrock Ct.
Morrison CO 80465
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs Environmental,Inc.is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene
and Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP),Lab
Code 101896-0 for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
analysis and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA),Lab ID 101533-Accreditation Certificate
#480 for Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM)analysis.This laboratory is currently proficient in both
Proficiency Testing and PAT programs respectively.
Reservoirs Environmental,Inc.has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your
request.The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as
stated in the attached analysis table.The results have been submitted to your office.
RES 207351 -1 is the job number assigned to this study.This report is considered highly confidential
and the sole property of the customer.Reservoirs Environmental,Inc.will not discuss any part of this study
with personnel other than those of the client.The results described in this report only apply to the samples
analyzed.This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or
any agency of the U.S.Government.This report shall not be reproduced except in full,without written
approval from Reservoirs Environmental,Inc.Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer
storage is requested.If you have any questions about this report,please feel free to call 303-964-1986.
Sincerely,
Jeanne Spencer Orr
President
Analyst(s):
_____________________________
Paul D.LoScalzo Wenlong Liu
Michael Scales Rich Wegrzyn
Anita Grigg Robert R.Workman Jr.
Bethany Nichols
P:3039641986 5801 Logan Street,Suite 100 Denver,CO 80216 1866RES1ENV
F:303-477-4275 www.reiIab.com
Page 1 of 2
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
S
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
,
IN
C
.
NV
L
A
P
La
b
Co
d
e
10
1
8
9
6
-
0
TD
H
Li
c
e
n
s
e
d
La
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y
#3
0
-
0
1
3
6
RE
S
Jo
b
Nu
m
b
e
r
:
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Cl
i
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Nu
m
b
e
r
I
P.
O
.
:
Cl
i
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:
Da
t
e
Sa
m
p
l
e
s
Re
c
e
i
v
e
d
:
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
Ty
p
e
:
Tu
r
n
a
r
o
u
n
d
:
Da
t
e
An
a
l
y
z
e
d
:
RE
S
20
7
3
5
1
-1
DS
Co
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
,
In
c
.
No
n
e
Gi
v
e
n
19
4
5
Br
a
d
l
e
y
Ln
.
,
Es
t
e
s
Pa
r
k
,
CO
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
7,
20
1
1
PL
M
,
Sh
o
r
t
Re
p
o
r
t
2
Ho
u
r
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
9,
20
1
1
TA
B
L
E
PL
M
BU
L
K
AN
A
L
Y
S
I
S
,
PE
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
CO
M
P
O
S
I
T
I
O
N
BY
VO
L
U
M
E
Pa
g
e
2
of
2
Cl
i
e
n
t
La
b
L
As
b
e
s
t
o
s
Co
n
t
e
n
t
No
n
No
n
Sa
m
p
l
e
ID
Nu
m
b
e
r
A
Su
b
As
b
e
s
t
o
s
Fi
b
r
o
u
s
Nu
m
b
e
r
Y
Ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
Pa
r
t
Fi
b
r
o
u
s
Co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
E
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(%
)
Mi
n
e
I
Vi
s
u
a
om
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
(%
)
R
I
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
(%
(%
)
DW
O
I
-
0
1
EM
69
5
0
0
7
A
Wh
i
t
e
ta
p
e
10
ND
95
5
B
Wh
i
t
e
co
m
p
o
u
n
d
w/
wh
i
t
e
pa
i
n
t
25
ND
0
10
0
C
Wh
i
t
e
j
o
i
n
t
c
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
25
ND
0
10
0
D
Ta
n
/
w
h
i
t
e
dr
y
w
a
l
l
40
ND
15
85
DW
O
I
-
0
2
EM
69
5
0
0
8
A
Wh
i
t
e
ta
p
e
10
ND
95
5
B
Wh
i
t
e
co
m
p
o
u
n
d
w/
wh
i
t
e
pa
i
n
t
30
ND
0
10
0
C
Wh
i
t
e
jo
i
n
t
co
m
p
o
u
n
d
30
ND
0
10
0
D
Ta
n
/
w
h
i
t
e
dr
y
w
a
l
l
30
ND
20
80
DW
O
I
-
0
3
EM
69
5
0
0
9
A
Wh
i
t
e
ta
p
e
10
ND
95
5
B
Wh
i
t
e
co
m
p
o
u
n
d
w/
wh
i
t
e
pa
i
n
t
30
ND
0
10
0
C
Wh
i
t
e
jo
i
n
t
co
m
p
o
u
n
d
30
ND
0
10
0
D
Ta
n
/
w
h
i
t
e
dr
y
w
a
l
l
30
ND
20
80
AC
Q
I
-
O
l
EM
69
5
0
1
0
A
Wh
i
t
e
ta
p
e
15
ND
95
5
B
Wh
i
t
e
fo
a
m
y
te
x
t
u
r
e
25
ND
0
10
0
C
Wh
i
t
e
jo
i
n
t
co
m
p
o
u
n
d
60
ND
0
10
0
AC
O
I
-
0
2
EM
69
5
0
1
1
A
Wh
i
t
e
ta
p
e
10
ND
95
5
B
Wh
i
t
e
fo
a
m
y
te
x
t
u
r
e
w/
wh
i
t
e
pa
i
n
t
30
ND
0
10
0
C
Wh
i
t
e
j
o
i
n
t
c
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
30
ND
0
10
0
D
Ta
n
/
p
i
n
k
dr
y
w
a
l
l
30
ND
20
80
AC
O
I
-
0
3
EM
69
5
0
1
2
A
Wh
i
t
e
f
o
a
m
y
t
e
x
t
u
r
e
20
ND
0
10
0
B
Ta
n
/
p
i
n
k
dr
y
w
a
l
l
80
ND
10
90
ND
No
n
e
fl
c
w
c
t
c
d
JR
I
la
c
e
.
<
%
su
a
I
Is
l
i
m
a
l
e
Ii
c
m
-
A
c
t
Tr
e
n
i
o
l
i
t
e
-
\
c
t
i
n
o
i
i
t
c
No
t
e
Fu
r
t
h
e
r
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
by
TF
M
is
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
fo
r
or
g
a
n
i
c
a
l
l
y
bo
u
n
d
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
(I
e.
fl
o
o
r
fu
e
l
if
P
L
\
l
re
,
i
i
l
t
s
ar
e
l
°
o
Da
t
a
QA