HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Estes Valley Planning Commission Study Session 2018-08-21Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado August 21, 2018
Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the PLANNING COMMISSION of the Town of
Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held Room 202/203 of Town Hall.
Commission: Chair Leavitt, Vice Chair White, Commissioners Schneider, Foster,
Murphree, Hull, Theis
Attending: Leavitt, Schneider, Foster, White, Theis, Murphree
Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Hunt, Senior Planner Woeber, Planner I
Becker, Senior Planner Woeber, County Liaison Whitley, Town Board
Liaison Norris, and Recording Secretary Swanlund
Absent: Commissioner Hull
Chair Leavitt called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m.
There were approximately 13 people in attendance. This study session was streamed and recorded
on the Town of Estes Park YouTube channel.
Introduction of PC Members and staff
Town Administrator Frank Lancaster spoke on a November ballot initiative that was approved, ballot
issue number 74, “Just compensation for fair market value by government law and regulation”, funded
by oil and gas industry and submitted through the farm bureau. It will allow property owners to seek
compensation from municipalities if their land is devalued. This could have major ramifications for
land use planning. Director Hunt referenced the Bert-Harris act in Florida as being something similar.
Wind River Development Plan, Special Review (child care) and lot consolidation
Planner Woeber summarized the Development Plan and Day Care special review. The amended plat
is a staff level review and not in the scope of the Planning Commissioners review. Concerns were
raised about landscaping with two lots vs one lot. Attorney White noted that lot consolidation is a use
by right. It is an appealable issue, although staff level. Planning Commission concerns from June
have been addressed by the applicant regarding the Development Plan. There are conditions to do
curb and gutter by CDOT if plan is approved. Discussion was had to clarify section 1.6, Housing Cost
Limits. The Day Care facility was reviewed and it was noted that the Development Plan and Special
Review are not legally linked but have been treated as singular package by reviewing agencies and
the public.
Location and Extent-Upper Thompson Sanitation District
Planner Woeber described the UTSD facilities and the plan for replacing the office and one garage
stall in the exact same footprint.
Estes Park Trolleys, Code Amendment and Special Review
Planner Woeber stated that the second page of exhibit Red has been replaced with a new handout.
The Bus/Sightseeing use is not addressed in Code, therefore this is the reason for this text
amendment. The applicant has used up their two temporary use permits and needs this code
amendment to continue to operate in their current location. The definition of “facility” will be
Planning Commission Study Session August 21, 2018 – Page 2
discussed in the public meeting as well as on site employee parking. It was asked if this code change
is meeting the need of a particular vendor or if there is a shortage of commercial properties. Director
Hunt explained the zoning conditions and noted that there are at least two other various permutations
going on right now that could benefit from this. Considerable discussion was had on what would and
would not be allowed on site.
Black Canyon Wedding Development Plan
Planner Becker stated that this will be pushed to the October 16 Planning Commission meeting, as
the applicants have not submitted updated plans.
Neighborhood/Community Meetings Code Amendment
Planner Becker reviewed the proposed Code Amendment change requiring developers to hold
neighborhood/community meetings once a Development Plan has been submitted. Details have
been taken from the city of Alachua, Florida. The meeting would use the same mailing list as the
application, and this would not expand the time frame of the application. This would encompass
everything that requires a public hearing. Any project of which there may be large community interest
could be added, even if it is a staff level review with an appropriate code amendment. Rezoning is
not covered in the table but is included in “Code Amendments”.
Lunch break 12:00-12:20
EVCPAC18 (comp plan) Report
Commissioner Foster discussed the first bi-monthly meeting of the EVCPAC, the committee formed
to jump start the update of the Comprehensive Plan. Trustee Norris is the chairman of the
committee. The goal of the next 3-4 meetings will be to come up with a deliverable RFP to a
consultant by December 31, 2018. A community outreach plan to cover the public interest was
mentioned. Trustee Norris added that meetings are every 2 weeks on Thursday at 3:30. Meetings
are open to the public. Next meeting will develop what to include and not include in a table of
contents, and initial thoughts on public outreach. The consultant picked for this phase is not
necessarily the same consultant that will write the plan.
Housing Needs study report:
Trustee Norris reviewed the town board discussion, which included putting together a Town Board
Committee for workforce housing and child care needs and issues, with Trustee Bangs and Assistant
Administrator Machalek. It is clear that there is a need for housing but the actual number is not clear.
The study doesn’t break down housing needs by category. Focusing on the solutions to the study’s
11 recommendations is the goal.
Code Modifications
Director Hunt suggested that it is time to amend Development Plan Review Requirements, Section
3.8, Table 3.3 of the Development Code. The table needs another column to be a complete table.
The added column would say what happens if review doesn’t fall into either of the other columns (e.g.
less than 10 parking spaces). Most codes for minimal parking spaces start at 3, not 10. Larimer
County bases its reviews on use or square footage of the building. Hunt proposed fixing the “loop
hole” with an amendment available for review by October.
Planning Commission Study Session August 21, 2018 – Page 3
Zoning Map discrepancy
Hunt summarized the original 1999 Zoning Map, dated as late as 2013, has a problem and was not
accurate for approximately 10 years. Cross hatch symbols for open spaces were placed on the map,
sometime around 2007, which should have never been added to the zoning map. Rules are very
strict about adding to official zoning maps. A proposal to readopt the entire official zoning map, after
thorough review by an independent auditor, to remove all question and doubt was advised. The legal
document is The Map, circa 1999. We owe the community an apology for the inaccurate map being
available to the public for the past 10 years.
Dark Skies Initiative
Commissioner White discussed how the Dark Sky Initiative came about, noting that “astro-tourism” is
a new, trending market. Rocky Mountain National Park has already taken the steps toward an
application process, which takes 1 to 2 years. If we go ahead with this, we would be the first National
Park/Gateway community pair to do this. Director Hunt noted that EP Light and Power would be most
affected by such a change, with a possible phase-in plan. More information and details will be
discussed in the September meeting. Currently, our code requires this with new construction and
vacation rentals.
Mountain Coaster
Hunt summarized the Mountain Coaster project, stating that it has been approved by staff and there
is a high probability of an appeal. If the appeal is in regard to the development plan it could come to
the Planning Commission. On August 6, when approval letter was issued, the clock started on the 30
day appeal process, which would make the deadline Wednesday, September 5. It is possible to have
two appeals, one for use classification and one for development plan. The appeal then has 60 days
to be brought before the decision making body.
Future Study Session Items
Vacation Home Regulations-October
Dark Skies Initiative
Zoning Map
Secretary Swanlund suggested texting the Commissioners, rather than calling, to let them know when
their note books are available for pick up.
There being no further business, Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 1:17 p.m.
_____________________________________
Bob Leavitt, Chair
Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary