Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Administrative Committee 1993-04-26ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE April 26, 1993 10:00 a.m. -- Room 103 AGENDA 1. Stanley Park Eminent Domain Proceeding - Request to begin. 2. Personnel Policy Manual - Review revisions. 3. Electric/Barbed Wire Fences - Discussion of revisions to ordinance prohibiting electric and barbed wire fences. 4. Investment Policy - Consideration of adoption. 5. Policy Agenda: 1993 - Quarterly progress report. 6. CIRSA Report: a. Annual Loss Review. b. Special Event Liability. c. Changes in P/C Coverages. 7. Executive Session: To discuss contract negotiations and personnel matters. April 23, 1993 TO: TOWN OF ESTES PARK r MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor Dannels and Board of Trustees FROM: Rich Widmer Assistant Town Administrator RE: �'- ,,.<C ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE AGENDA DISCUSSION STANLEY PARK EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING Included are two memos from Town Attorney White regarding the procedures necessary to clear the title to Stanley Park. Mr. White's estimate is a cost of about $20,000 for appraisal, court costs and legal fees. A map is attached which shows that Stanley Park was obtained in three parcels: one from F.O. Stanley, one from Estes Park Development Company, and one from the Manfords. Also included is a memo from Finance Officer Vavra and myself stating that $21,033 in extra fund balance is available in the Special Events Fund. In addition, a letter from Susan Davis and another from Town Attorney White is included which describe the assistance the town might receive from Francis Stanley in regard to clearing the title. Recommendation: Recommend to the Town Board eminent domain proceedings be started for Stanley Park. (3031586-5331 P.O. BOX 1200 3 ESTES PARK, CO80517 ® FAX (303)586-2816ADMINISTRAEION r 03) OTHER Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Administrative Committee Meeting, April 26, 1993 -- Page 2 PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL REVISIONS The Americans with Disabilities Act requires us to review all written policies for compliance. As we were proceeding to do this for the Personnel Policy Manual, it became obvious it was time to update the entire manual and include all approved changes made to date. A copy of the manual with revisions marked is enclosed. Almost all are either housekeeping or previously -approved changes. We have added new sections on Demotion, the Family Leave Act, and Sexual Harassment. We will discuss each change during the meeting. Recommendation: Recommend to the Town Board adoption of the changes to the Personnel Policy Manual as presented or modified. ELECTRIC/BARBED WIRE FENCES Included is a copy of the ordinance as proposed at the March 23rd Town Board meeting. Also included is a copy of the transcript of that meeting for review of the discussion which took place. Staff is prepared to modify the ordinance in any manner you decide. Recommendation: Recommend to the Town Board adoption of the ordinance as modified, table to a future meeting, assign to a committee, or drop. INVESTMENT POLICY Enclosed is a suggested investment policy for the town. It has been reviewed by Finance Officer Vavra, Steve Jackson, and Town Administrator Klaphake. Adoption of an Investment Policy is part of Goal #3, Maintain Strong Financial Position, of the Policy Agenda: 1993. Recommendation: Recommend to the Town Board adoption of the Investment Policy as presented or modified. POLICY AGENDA: 1993 QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT Enclosed is a summary sheet showing the progress to date of each of the "A" priority goals established at the summer board retreat, plus the three added at the January 26th meeting. I will go into as much detail as you wish on each item. This is also an appropriate time to revise the goals or add to them, if you wish. Recommendation: No recommendation needed unless new goals are added or existing ones modified. Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Administrative Committee Meeting, April 26, 1993 -- Page 3 CIRSA REPORT Included is a letter from CIRSA detailing our 1992-loss record and audit of loss control standards. Our 1992 losses shows a decline over the last three-year period and our audit score increased from last year. Finance Officer Vavra will answer any questions you have concerning this matter. Also included is some information from CIRSA regarding special events and the need to have the town named as an additional insured. We have also included information about the changes in Property/Casualty and Liability coverages provided through CIRSA. Recommendation: No recommendation needed. EXECUTIVE SESSION An Executive Session is needed to discuss progress to date on the EPURA and EVRPD consolidations and the EPSD and UTSD merger. Town Attorney White advises an Executive Session is appropriate since Intergovernmental Agreements (contracts) will be needed. The second item of the session will be a presentation on the Town's organization chart (personnel) by Town Administrator Klaphake. . .I DUM To: Gary Rlaphake From: Greg White Date: March 8, 1993 Re: Stanley Park y inent Domain Proceeding The first step in the eminent domain proceeding is to get a qualified appraisal of the property (future interest) to be condemned. Because appraisal of a future interest is not a common process, it may be difficult to find an appraiser who has sufficient background to render a qualified appraisal. I recommend that the appraiser be authorized to hire an attorney with expertise in real estate and future interests for consultation. Thecost of the consultation would be included in the cost of the appraisal. Consulting with an attorney not hired by the Town would give the appraiser confidence in the information regarding future interest values and assurance that it is not biased. It would also be evidence of reasonableness should a question arise before the court as to whether the Town had negotiated in good faith. It is my feeling that the legal fees for an eminent domain action will not exceed $15,000 unless there are extenuating circumstances. The appraisal, including consultation with a real estate/future interest attorney, should be in the $3,000 - $4,000 range. I anticipate that publication and court costs will be approximately $1,000. SENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT ; 4- 7-93 4:29PM ; 6699380-) 303E666909;# 3 MEMORANDUM To: Board of Trustees From: Greg White Date: January 20, 1993 Re: Stanley Park Future Interest Eminent Domain We have completed the necessary research to proceed with condemnation action against the heirs of F.O. Stanley for the future interest retained by F.O. Stanley in the deed to the Town of Estes Park for the property known as Stanley Park. The purpose of the memorandum is to outline the specific requirements and actions necessary to proceed with condemnation. We attempted to contact the heirs of F.O. Stanley by letter dated October 20, 1992, a sample of which is attached. To date, only six written responses and one telephone response have been received, only two of which have produced a quit claim deed for the future interest. This was an inexpensive attempt to clear title, but as it has not been successful, we now recommend that the Town consider proceeding with condemnation under 38-1-101, et seq., C.R.S. We believe that the Town has sufficient statutory authority to proceed. It will also be necessary to quiet title to the property, so that the court may be assured that all persons claiming an interest in the property have been determined. We recommend that a quiet title action proceed simultaneously with the condemnation action. The following are actions items required to Complete the condemnation: 1. The Trustees should authorize staff and legal counsel to proceed with condemnation. Any detailed discussion of the legal action involved should take place in executive session as a litigation matter. A proposed resolution is attached. 2. The property to be condemned, the future interest, must be appraised by a qualified appraiser to determine the value of the property and fix compensation to the property owners. In this instance, we anticipate that the value placed on the property will be minimal, since the future interest is, at best, a reversionary interest, the vesting of which is controlled by the Town. I am attempting to contact an appraiser and will have the appraisal made. 3. A good faith offer must be made to the property owners to acquire the property. We will draft a letter with an offer, based upon the appraisal, enclose a quit claim deed, and send this to the list of heirs, plus any revisions to the list we are able to make. The courts do not require that the good faith offer be made to owners who cannot be located, so long as a reasonable attempt is made to locate all owners and contact them. require that negotiations be extensive The case law does not condemnation action, so long as there is pevideior n a thatoi furthera negotiations would be futile. 4. Once good faith negotiations have been attempted and either completed or abandoned, the petition for condemnation ma be filed with the court. At that time, a summons and copyy petition must be served upon all of the owners of the propertytto be condemned, according to the same procedures for other ciil actions. When the Whereabouts of all owners cannot be determined, the court may permit Service by publication of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. of to Rule 4 would proceed under 38-1-101, et seq., C.R.S. to complete the condemnation action. The court may receive compensation awarded to the property owners into the registry of the court. In order for the court to then know who to release the funds to, it will be necessaryto complete a quiet title action. once the compensation awaris tendered to the registry of the court, the Town will be able to have possession of the property. S. There is no specific provision in the eminent domain statues for dismissal of a petition for condemnation, but as the proceedings follow the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedures (C•R•C•P•), except as otherwise provided in the statute, dismissal of the petition could presumably determination of compensation be beyond the be or1 budget of the Town. p'ee title does not vest in the condemning authority until the compensation is determined and paid to the registry of the court. Thus, a motion to dismiss the permissible up to the point of title vestinPetitith should be if a plaintiff dismisses a complaint, the plaintiffUndema a C.R.C.P., be to paying court costs and attorneys fees to the may sutiotn. Presumably this would also be true of dismissal of a petition in eminent domain. is., U. tel s v< • IEY I 4 (UNIT co►-maNITV W 1222Intrili: ; w wuriprpilipril,... „RI, atAnax.iiil At boil En , ii .Adir(((ompr. B a:/I g .Z _ V -2�>E WV: i 1r•1 • 0 ATHLETIC FIELD V-I STANLEY I. , •� 1 II I, II If- I U 1 II I m is co 0 e V1 c 00 00 n April 8, 1993 TO: FROM: Rich Widmer Monte Vavra MEMORANDUM Administrative Committee SUBJECT: Additional �-pecial Events Fund Balance Due to lower than projected expenses, the Special Events fund ended 1992 with $21,033 more in the fund balance than estimated. This money could be appropriated by resolution for whatever use you decide is appropriate. MAR rr F 1993 Trustees: Emmons M. Pinkham, '93 President Don A. Bourdon, '93 Vice -Pre .,iderrt William P. Dubord, '93 Secretary David S. Greenlaw, '94 Treasurer John D. Beaupre, '93 Curtis L. Blake, '93 Jerome NI. Farnsworth, 94 Marla D. Ferris, '93 Mark E. Hurvitt, '94 Linwood B. Pinkham, '94 John R. White, '94 Trustee in Memoriam: Raymond W. Stanley Advisors: Thelma S. Chenoweth Arthur C. Hart, Jr. Christopher Hutchins Richard J. Keenan Thomas C. Marshall C. Susan Mason George H. Stanley Augusta H. Tapley Special Advisor: Francis E. Stanley Director: Susan S. Davis Yankee Ingenuity at Work USEU SCHOOL STREET Gary Klaphake Town Administrator PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Gary, KINGFIELD, MAINE 04947 March 19, 1993 207-265-2729 When keeping up on a daily basis is barely this side of a dream, what can we then say about catching up when we return? What was it you said to Frank Hix about attention units being a little stretched? I am, however, beginning to see light at the end of the tunnel. Not to take up unnecessary attention units in your already -packed schedule, I simply wanted to thank you for the time you invested in my visit earlier this month. I hope it helped. It was a pleasure for me, in the process, to become better acquainted with some of the projects filling your agenda, and thus EP's agenda. I was so impressed with the whole town, and it is no accident that our lunch started things off. I was also impressed by the Stanley legacy, and the rather odd feeling I got that F.O. himself has almost gotten lost by it. I charged Frank, Judith, Lynn Swain, and others in my path to curate an F.O./Estes Park exhibit for the Stanley Museum, to open May 1994 here. There's so much to be told! The possibility of your Museum having a place on the Stanley property is very exciting - attendance, and with it mission -fulfillment, should improve dramatically. Not to mention putting a lot of things in much better, and more accurate, historical perspective, not that Stanley is all that Estes Park is by a long shot. I hope that that project is moving along the way you want it to. Francis is prepared to contact relatives to handle your situation with regard to the encumbrances, as soon as The Stanley Museum is a non-profit corporation. Donations and gifts are tax deductible within the limits of the law. 1-6 Gary Klaphake, March 19, 1993 Stanley Museum Page 2 of 2 he has heard from you about who has to sign off. We calculated that something like 13 (?) sounded a lot better than 50-some. He is also awaiting work from me on that score, and I hope to have that request fulfilled by Monday, 3/22. Once again, thank you for your hospitality during my visit, Gary. I shall be out again in July, to see my daughter who will be staying at the Hixes' and working at the Stanley. I shall stop in if time allows - for both of us - to catch up. Sincerely, i- Susan S. Davis Director SSD/ r LvNN A. HAMMDNO REISER E. CLARK QREbCRV A. WM1TE MARTHA P. ALIRIOMT HAMMONd1 C+LARk AND WHITt LAW OFIricIca FIRST NATIaNAL SANK qU ILOiNS, SUITE d1R 7:131:1 CART SEVENTH STREET LOVELAND, COLCMAoo 110637 303•46711023 TELETAX 303.669.838U April 13, 1993 ALFaRb P. CAVIS or OQYNSEI. Francis E. Stanley P.O. Box 506 Santa Pe, New Mexico 87504 Dear Mr. Stanley; I removing the iste deedyour offer restriction assist the Town of Estes Park rreoted byg ion on the Stanley Park property in discussed ia your telephonel conversation e, P.o. Stanley in April 7, 93 we generously offered to assist the Townincontacting heirs of Stanley to attempt to have them execute the necessaryQuit Deeds to quit• 4. claim any interest they may have nthe Claim reversionary interest to the consider reimbursinr Town. .You requested that the Town s thatfyouoma °f`pocket expenses, such as long distance phone callsy incur in this effort, but your time would be donated to the Tawas should consider reimbursing Sue Also, you suggested that the for her expenses incurred in this effort.Davis of the Stanley Museum Once again I would like to thank you for your offer of hel in this matter. As I stated on the phone, the estio p proceeding with regard to the Stanley Park issuen willbef presented to the Town Board on April 26, 1993. At that time I will relate your offer to the Town Board and I am sure that will be more than happy to have they mutual effort to clear the title touStaanlleytPark. arice as part in of a fact the Town Board authorizes me to proceed, shortly after April, 26, 1993 with information that l be contacting neeyou regard to obtaining the necessary signatures. youneed with Estes Once again, a your offerh to thank You on behalf of the Town of accurately restate the essences of aour c If this letter does ul not appreciate it if you would give me a conversation, I would further thoughts with regarto this cmatterApri lso, if you have any 1993, I would appreciate it if you would contact me to April 26, Very truly yours, GAW:jc cc. Gary Klaphake Gregory A. White FRANCIS E. STANLEY architect P.Q. PDX 506 SANTA FE, NM *7504 TEL 505 983.2258 April 17, 1993 Gregory A. White, Attorney Hammond, Clark & White 200 East Seventh. Street - Suite 418 Loveland, Co 80537 RE: Stanley Park, Estes Park, Colorado. Dear Mr. White: I am glad to have spoken with you about the deed restriction on the reference property, and I appreciate your letter of April 13, 1993. The terms sound fine to me. I would like to proceed with getting this matter behind us, and, once I hear from you, I would like to put together a letter to those concerned and in the bloodline. I still have some mare pictures to have developed which I shall include with the map I have of Estes Park when I do my report. Also I hope to be in Maine for several weeks in June and July which would permit personal contact with heirs if needed. I do think the Stanley Museum should be reimbursed for the time Sue Davis spent tracking down the members of the Stanley clan, and any other help she may give in completing this matter. I have one question about the deed which Uncle Freel signed, and a copy of which vas given to me by Frank Hie. Why was it not witnessed or recorded? I would be interested to know at your convenience. Withfsest re•. �� I' Fr ncis E. a ley Enc loss : (1 c c: Suaan Davis Adopted October 14, 1986 Revised: December 16, 1986; June 9, 1987; September 29, 1987; January 26, 1988; April 25, 1989; January, 1991; APRIL, 1993 PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL Capital letters indicate new material to be added and dashes through the words indicate deletions. TOWN OF ESTES PARR PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Equal Employment Opportunity 1 B. Recruitment and Selection 1 C. Employee Classifications 2 D. Employment of Relatives 2 E. Pay Philosophy 3 F. Pay Plan 3 G. Probationary Period 3 H. Performance Evaluations 4 1. Merit Increase 4 2. Probationary Increase 5 3. Promotions 5 4. Employee Incentives/Rewards 5 I. Exempt and Non -Exempt Employees 6 J. Work Week 7 K. Overtime 7 L. Compensatory Time 8 M. Employee Conduct 8 1. Outside Employment 8 2. Gifts 8 3. Alcohol and Drugs 9 N. Disciplinary Action 9 1. Verbal Warning 10 2. Written Warning 10 3. Suspension 10 4. DEMOTION 10 5. Termination 11 O. Appeals Process 12 P. Resignation 13 Q. Re-employment 14 R. Retirement 14 S. Leave 14 1. Annual Leave 14 2. Sick Leave 17 3. Emergency Leave 17 4. Jury Leave • 18 5. FAMILY LEAVE 18 T. Holidays 18 I TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page U. Insurance 20 1. MEDICAL AND DENTAL INSURANCE 20 2. GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 22 3. FIRE & POLICE PENSION 22 4. MEDICAL PROVIDER . . . 22 V. Educational Assistance 22 W. Required Training 23 X. Personal Vehicle Usage for Town Business 24 Y. Town Vehicle Usage 24 Z. Vehicle Allowance 26 AA. Harassment 27 Employee Acceptance Receipt Designated Workers Compensation Medical Provider Exhibit 1 - Police Department - General Rules i Exhibit 2 - Police Department - Vehicle Rules . CONTRACT DISCLAIMER This Personal Policy Manual does not and is not intended to create a contract between the Town of Estes Park and any employee, or to grant a right to any employee to be continued in the employment of the Town of Estes Park, or to limit the right of the Town of Estes Park to discharge its employees with or without cause. (Board of Trustees - January 26, 1988). This Personnel Policy Manual is subject to change by the Town of Estes Park at any time, including changes to benefits provided and to personnel practices, and the changes may apply to then current as well as future employees. (Board of Trustees - January 26, 1988). III PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL These personnel policies pertain to all employees of the Town of •Estes Park EXCEPT ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS. This includes full-time, part-time, and temporary employees unless otherwise noted. These policies have been approved by the Board of Trustees and are administered by the Town Administrator and/or Department Supervisors. Department Supervisors are the Assistant Town Administrator, Town Clerk, Light and Power Director, Public Works Director, Finance Officer, Police Chief, Community Development Director, Special Projects Manager/Landscape Architect, and Special Events Director, AND MUSEUM DIRECTOR. EMPLOYEES WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, INCLUDING CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES, ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT MANUAL. DISCIPLINARY ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST A POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE FOR VIOLATIONS OF BOTH THE TOWN'S PERSONNEL MANUAL AND THE ESTES PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT'S MANUAL. THE PROCEDURE FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN THIS MANUAL. A. Equal Employment Opportunity The Town of Estes Park is an equal opportunity employer AND DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF RACE, RELIGION, COLOR, SEX, AGE, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR DISABILITIES. Discrimination io prohibitcd against any person in any aspect of personnel administration due to race, color, religion, national origin, political affiliation or other non merit factor. is also prohibited unless these factors constitute an occupational qualification. B. Recruitment and Selection Candidates for job vacancies will be recruited both internally and externally. Consideration shall be given for promotion from within the Town ranks, but not to the exclusion of 1 qualified outside applicants. Meaningful, equitable and realistic job requirements shall be established for recruiting, with provision for appropriate testing procedures. C. Employee Classifications The majority of Town positions are full-time in nature; however, part-time and temporary positions exist. Distinctions of the classifications are: Permanent Employee: Any person hired for a specific job who is expected to work on a continuing basis and meet certain performance and time -on -job requirements. Full -Time Employee: An employee who works a minimum of 35 hours per week, 52 weeks per year. Temporary Employee: Any person hired for a special project, on an "as -needed" basis, for seasonal work, or for any kind of work on a transitory or casual nature. Part -Time Employee: Any person working on a continuing basis who works a minimum of 20 hours per week but less than 35 hours per week, but who performs similar or identical work assignments to a full-time employee. Permanent Part -Time Employee: A part-time employee who works in a long-term position of 6 months or more duration. Temporary Part -Time Employee: A part-time employee occupying short-term positions of 6 months or less duration. D. Employment of Relatives No employee of the Town of Estes Park shall occupy a position for the Town whereby the employee is supervised or evaluated by a spouse, parent, child, brother, sister, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, or a person living, abiding or residing with such employee. (Board of Trustees - October 9, 1984). 2 E. Pay Philosophy The Town of Estes Park follows a "merit" compensation philosophy (i.e.: employees are evaluated based upon performance and pay increases coincide with level of performance). This merit system provides incentives for each individual to put forth THEIR his/hcr best efforts on the job. This means that each individual's progress on the job is reviewed regularly, recognizing the employee's achievements and suggesting areas of possible improvement. The prime responsibility for determining the amount of merit increases rests with the Town Administrator and the Department Supervisors, working within guidelines/limits established by the Board of Trustees. F. Pay Plan Full-time and permanent part-time positions are included in the Town's classification system. Erect-e —are-moo= included in the classification plan. Jobs are assigned various grades, based upon levels of responsibility, nature of decisions made on the job, and qualifications. Every Town employee in a particular job classification will be paid within the same grade. Employees move through their respective grades on the basis of job performance. At the discretion of the Board of Trustees, the pay plan is evaluated periodically to: (1) determine the adequacy of existing pay rates to reflect cost of living changes and other influencing factors; and (2) take into account any pertinent changes in responsibilities or qualifications that may impact the classification of a job. G. Probationary Period The probationary period allows a supervisor to train, observe, and evaluate an employee's work in order to determine fitness 3 for a position. All appointments (original, promotional, re- employment and re -instatement) are subject to a probationary period. The length of the probationary period is determined by the employee's classification: • the probationary period for general Town employees is six (6) months. • The probationary period for Public Safety personnel is one (1) year. All employees will be evaluated at the end of their probationary period with regard to their proven ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the position. If, at any time during the probationary period, the Department Supervisor determines that the services of the employee have been unsatisfactory, the supervisor may take such appropriate action as termination, demotion or extension of the probationary period. This action must be approved by the Town Administrator and is without right of appeal or hearing. (Board of Trustees - December 13, 1977). H. Performance Evaluations Using a prescribed format, written evaluations will be completed by supervisors for each employee below the level of Department Supervisor. Written evaluations are given to employees upon completion of the probationary period and by the mid year pay period thereafter FIRST OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR THEREAFTER. The employee's supervisor will discuss completed evaluations with each employee to point out the employee's strengths and weaknesses and to recommend ways to improve performance. 1. Merit Increases The Board of Trustees may authorize a merit pool 4 for each department. Merit pay increases are based upon the employee's performance and the employee will be evaluated by the mid year pay period FIRST OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR.. t The merit increase, if given, will take effect the first day of the mid year FIRST payroll cycle. (Board of Trustees - October 9, 1984; November 19, 1990). 2. Probationary Increase Department Supervisors are permitted to give new employees,a merit increase following their sixth - month evaluation if the evaluation indicates superior performance. The amount of increase will depend upon the recommendation of the Department Supervisor and will not exceed 5%. This merit increase shall be in addition to the annual merit limits set by the Board of Trustees each year. (Board of Trustees - September 16, 1985). 3. Promotions Employees who are promoted will be placed at a position in their new pay grade which is at least five (5) percent higher than their current rate of pay. 4. Employee Incentives/Rewards The Town of Estes Park, as designated in the Municipal Code Section 2.08, may upon recommendation of the Department Supervisor, award special employee incentives in recognition of outstanding service to the Town of Estes Park. This award may be monetary or otherwise. Police Department personnel are eligible to receive a Citation for Valor, Departmental Citation or Merit Citation. The Citation for Valor shall be awarded only in exceptional cases where a hazardous duty is performed by an officer who risks his life in such duty. Departmental citations shall be awarded for the performance of police service requiring exceptional courage and bravery, or where, because of the outstanding nature of the act, a life is saved, a serious crime prevented, or a person arrested who has committed a serious crime. A Merit Citation shall be awarded to any officer whose service in the line of duty, whether it involves physical danger or not, indicates unusual thoroughness, conscientiousness, determination and initiative in performing a difficult assignment, which results in or is instrumental in protecting the life or property of any person. Final approval for Incentive Awards will be given by the Department Supervisor. (Board of Trustees - March 26, 1985). I. Exempt and Non -Exempt Employees The Town of Estes Park adheres to the guidelines set forth by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). (The act covers such compensatory regulations such as overtime and minimum wage). Those job positions regulated by the act are termed "non- exempt"; those employees not within the purview of the FLSA are termed "exempt." Town positions which are exempt ARE ALL DEPARTMENT SUPERVISORS. include: Town Administrator* Assistant Town Administrator* Town Clerk* Light and Power Director* Public Works Director* Finance Officer* Police Chief Community Development Director* Special Events Directorl" Assistant to Light and Power Director 6 Light and Power Linc Foreman Engineering Technician street/Park Superintcndcnt Water Superintendent Police Captain, Lieutenant, Corporal, Sergeant and Detective Building Official Museum Director* *Department Supervisors Exempt employees, except Department Supervisors, will be paid overtime or compensatory time in accordance with the Fair Labor Etandard3 Act. (Board of Tru3tcca Ccptember 16, 1985). J. Work Week The work week for Town Employees (excluding certified police officers) will be from 12:01 A.M. Sunday through 12:00 Midnight Saturday. The work week will consist of either five (5) 8-hour days or four (4) 10-hour days as designated by the Department Supervisor. (Board of Trustees - September 16, 1985). The work period for certified police officers will be a 28-day cycle which will begin at 7:00 A.M. every fourth Monday. The work shift will be either 8 or 10 hours in length, as designated by the Department Supervisor. (Board of Trustees - September 16, 1985). K. Overtime Overtime hours must be authorized by the Department Supervisor. Hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week will be calculated at a rate of one and one-half times the employee's hourly rate. An exception to this policy is for certified police officers, who will receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 171 hours in a work period. 7 Authorized paid time off (i.e.: annual leave, sick leave, holiday leave and other leave) is counted as hours actually worked in that pay period. These hours are calculated for overtime purposes when the leave period is actually taken. (Board of Trustees - September 16, 1985). L. Compensatory Time Compensatory time ("comp. time") must be authorized by the Department Supervisor. Compensatory time can be accumulated to a maximum of 240 hours (for 160 overtime hours worked) and 480 hours (320 hours of overtime) for employees engaged in a "public safety activity, an emergency response activity, or a seasonal activity." ANY ACCRUED COMPENSATORY TIME NOT TAKEN IN THE CALENDAR YEAR IN WHICH IT IS ACCUMULATED WILL BE PAID AT . THE END OF THE CALENDAR YEAR 11,3=0=Rinst. Trustees - September 16, 1985). (Board of M. Employee Conduct Employees will conduct themselves, at all times, in a manner which reflects favorably on the Town. • 1. Outside Employment An employee may engage in outside employment provided that such employment will not interfere with the proper and efficient performance of the employee's Town duties, and where there is no conflict of interest. Prior to accepting outside employment, an employee shall obtain approval from his/her THEIR Department Supervisor. 2. Gifts Soliciting or accepting gifts for services of monetary value from any person doing business with the Town is prohibited. 8 3. Alcohol and Drugs The use or display of alcoholic beverages or non - medicinal drugs by a Town employee during working hours WHILE ON DUTY is prohibited. ON DUTY WILL INCLUDE ON -CALL DUTY HOURS. Police Department "Ccncral Rules of Conduct" arc shown in Exhibit 1 (Police Department General Rules) at the conclusion of this manual. Disciplinary Action Disciplinary action may be taken against an employee who has failed to conduct THEMSELVES him/hcrrclf in a manner consistent with accepted standards of employment or conduct. Causes for disciplinary action include, but are not limited to: 1. Gross neglect of duty. 2. Refusal to comply with proper commands or instructions. 3. Insubordination. 4. Offensive language or conduct, INCLUDING HARASSMENT. 5. Continued Incompetence, and inefficiency or carelessness in performing job duties. 6. Theft of property or falsification of records. 7. Consuming alcoholic beverages or non -medicinal drugs in the course of reporting to work or while on duty, or being adversely under, the influence of alcohol or non -medicinal drugs while on duty. Disciplinary action can take the form of a verbal warning, written warning, DEMOTION, suspension or TERMINATION discharge. The nature and severity of the disciplinary action will be determined by the Department Supervisor. In the case. of the Police Department, disciplinary action will be enforced by the designated chain of command.: Police Sergeant, Lieutenant, Captain, Chief of Police and Town Administrator. 9 Specific causes for disciplinary action relative to Police Department personnel arc Shown a3 part of Exhibit 1 (Police Department Cencral Rules). 1. Verbal Warning The supervisor will discuss the facts in the case, in private, with the employee involved. The employee will also be advised what action will be taken should another violation occur. The supervisor will document the verbal warning and place a copy in the employee's personnel file. 2. Written Warning The supervisor will review the facts of the case with the employee, and in the presence of the Department Supervisor, if deemed necessary. The employee will be advised what action will be taken if another violation occurs.. The employee will sign the written warning, and will have the right to note any disagreement with what is stated on the written warning. A copy of the written warning will be given to the employee and a copy will be placed in the employee's personnel file. 3. Suspension If eft THE employee's unacceptable action OR OMISSION continues after hc/shc has been warned, both verbally and in writing CONDUCT WARRANTS SUSPENSION, a supervisor then has the option of suspending the employee. This action may be with or without pay. 4. Demotion IF THE EMPLOYEE'S CONDUCT WARRANTS DEMOTION, A SUPERVISOR HAS THE OPTION OF DEMOTING THE EMPLOYEE TO A LOWER PAY GRADE. 10 5. Termination If an employee's unacceptable behavior continuca after he/ahc has bccn warned or ouspendcd, the employee will be terminated. IF THE EMPLOYEE'S CONDUCT WARRANTS TERMINATION, A SUPERVISOR HAS THE OPTION OF TERMINATING THE EMPLOYEE. The employee will have the right to a pre -termination hearing with the Department Supervisor if he/she THE EMPLOYEE so chooses. This gives the employee an opportunity, prior to diocharge TERMINATION, to produce contrary records or testimony on his/her THE EMPLOYEE'S behalf. Terminations must receive approval of the Town Administrator. IN TAKING ANY DISCIPLINARY ACTION, A DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR SHALL CONSIDER ALL PREVIOUS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS INVOLVING THE EMPLOYEE. A SUPERVISOR MAY TAKE ANY OF THE ABOVE DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS, INCLUDING TERMINATION, WITHOUT FIRST WARNING, SUSPENDING, OR DEMOTING THE EMPLOYEE. Termination of employment for a permanent employee with not -less -than one (1) years service which has not been requested by an employee, will result in payment for the accrued annual leave, COMP TIME, OR AND HOLIDAY HOURS. (Board of Trustees - November 28, 1978). Termination may occur as a result of a reduction in the number of employees of the Town of Estes Park due to reorganization of the Town and/or reductions in force due to economic or other circumstances. (Board of Trustees - January 26, 1988). Note: A 3upervi3or i3 not required to follow each of thc3c 3tepo prior to terminating an cmploycc. If an employcc'3 action i3 of 3ufficicnt ccvcrity, a 3upervioor can terminate the employee prior to following the warning or 3u0pending proccdurc3. 6. ANY DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST A DEPARTMENT. SUPERVISOR SHALL BE MADE BY THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR. THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE PROCEDURE FOR EMPLOYEES, SUBSTITUTING THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR FOR A DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR. IF A DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR IS DISCIPLINED, THE TOWN BOARD SHALL SUBSTITUTE FOR THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR IN THE APPEALS PROCESS. O. Appeals Process An employee may appeal disciplinary action against him/her THEM within 15 5 working days of a Department Supervisor's action. The appeal will be reviewed by the Town Administrator. To appeal an action, an employee shall submit a written request to the Town Administrator. The Town Administrator will affirm or reverse the appeal, in whole or in part, within .15 5 working days (a "working day" is Monday through Friday, excluding any legal holiday which might fall on any of said weekdays) from the date of receipt. The Town Administrator will notify the employee fin writing} of his/her determination. The employee then has the right to appeal the Town Administrator's decision to the appropriate Committee of the Board of Trustees. The Committee will then set a date and time for the appeal hearing and the employee will be given written notice of the date and time. The notice will be personally delivered or sent certified mail to the address the employee submits to the Town Administrator at the time the employee makes his/her THEIR appeal. 12 If the appeal hearing date is mailed, it shall be deemed delivered when deposited in the United States mail. The notice will be delivered to the employee at least five (5) days prior to the hearing day. The appeal hearing shall be a public hearing if so requested by the employee. the employee shall be entitled to representation by an attorney, at the employee's sole expense. If a public hearing is not requested by the employee, the appeal hearing shall be closed to the public. The employee shall be entitled to testify and present evidence on THEIR his/her behalf, together with the right of cross- examine EXAMINATION OF all adverse witnesses who testify at the hearing. The Committee shall affirm or reverse the Department Supervisor's action within 34 10 working days of the hearing date. The decision shall be in writing and either personally delivered to the employee or mailed by certified mail. If mailed, decision will be deemed delivered when deposited in the United States mail. The Department Supervisor's action, the Town Administrator's determination, and the determination of the Committee shall become a part of the Town's personnel files and subject to inspection as allowed by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. If the employee is terminated or resigns, the came shall be confidential information. (Board of Trustees - January 10, 1978; July 3, 1978). P. Resignation To resign in good standing, 39 14 days written notice must be given to the employee's Department Supervisor. Failure to do so MAY will result in the cancellation of all accrued annual leave, unless extenuating circumstances exist as determined by the Department Supervisor. 13 Q. Re-employment For any employee who leaves the Town of Estes Park in good standing, and returns within three (3) months from the date of termination, the Town of Estes Park will restore all longevity credit as it pertains to benefit accrual. This section does not guarantee re-employment. (Board of Trustees - December 16, 1986). R. Retirement All employees shall be retired upon reaching the age of 70 unless an exception is requested of, and 'approved, by the Board of Trustees. Each exception must be renewed on an annual basis thereafter, and may be withdrawn by the Board at anytime. Town employees are covered by, and contributions made, to the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and the Social Security Administration according to State and Federal Law. (Board of Trustees - December 13, 1977; November 28, 1978). For those employees covered under the provisions of State of Colorado Statute 24-51-911 who elect to be exempted from PERA, the Town of Estes Park will contribute an amount equal to the current employer's PERA contribution to the employee's International City Management Association Retirement Corporation Program (ICMA). (Board of. Trustees - April 9, 1985). For Police employees, the Town of Estes Park contributes to the ICMA Retirement Corporation Program for retirement and to the Fire and Police Pension Association for death and disability. S. Leave 1. Annual Leave Annual leave may WILL be accrued by all full-time 14 permanent and part-time permanent employees. The accrual of annual leave begins upon initial employment, and hours are earned each month based upon the following schedule: Years of Service Hours Earned Per Month* Maximum Allowable Carry Over 0 through 3 7 168 Hours 4 through 39 7 8 192 " 11 through 15 10 240 " 8 16+ 13 312 " *Pro -rated for eligible part-time employees. An employee will forfeit (on THEIR hi3/hcr anniversary date) any accumulated'annual leave that exceeds the maximum allowable carry over. For example: A six -year employee who has 212 hours of accrued annual leave will lose 20 hours leave (212 accrued hours minus 192 allowable carry over hours). Annual leave should be requested in advance and is granted at the discretion of each employee's supervisor. Requests for annual leave may be deferred based upon workload. An employee may not use annual leave in cxccss of that which i3 earned in a one year period unlcs3 requested in writing from and approved in advance by the cmployce'3 3upervisor. (Board of Tru3tecs July 3, 1978; April 9, 1985). 15 Terminated, permanent employees who have been employed by the Town for more than one (1) year will receive their accrued annual leave. (Board of Trustees November 28, 1978). 2. Sick Leave All Town employees will earn sick leave SICK LEAVE WILL BE ACCRUED BY ALL FULL-TIME PERMANENT AND PERMANENT PART-TIME EMPLOYEES at the rate of eight (8) hours per month (pro -rated for ELIGIBLE part- time EMPLOYEES and temporary personnel). Sick leave may be taken for personal illness, or for the illness, birth, or surgery of a family membe.r THE EMPLOYEE'S SPOUSE, CHILDREN, OR PARENT. (Board of Trustees - April 25, 1989). When an employee takes more than two (2) continuous days of sick leave, that employee's supervisor may require submittal of a doctor's certificate. Employees who accumulate more than 480 hours sick leave will be allowed to convert all hours beyond the 480 hours to annual leave on a 2-for-1 basis. For example, if an employee has 480 hours of unused sick leave on THEIR his/her anniversary date and obtains an additional 96 hours during the next year without using any sick leave, the employee will be allowed to convert the 96 hours to 48 hours of annual leave. Note: sick leave hours are not available to convert to annual leave until the employee's anniversary date* or termination. Upon termination, only the hours accrued since the last anniversary- ate -excess of 48-ean-be- Pcrtcd to annual leave. The conversion will not apply to 16 the balance of hours transferred to the "sick leave bank" as of January 1, 1985*. Also, THE excc3a sick leave BANK must be used prior to using the first 480 hours. Sick leave cannot be used during an employee's annual leave unless approved by the Department Supervisor. (*Board of Trustees - June 9, 1987). Under no circumstances can more than 96 hours of unused sick leave be converted to annual leave during a given year. (Board of Trustees - October 9, 1984) . A terminating employee that has completed 20 years of continuous service shall be compensated for 50% of the accumulated sick leave hours, including any hours in the sick leave bank. Said compensation will be computed at the same rate as final pay. (Board of Trustees - September 29, 1987; April 25, 1989). 3. Emergency Leave Employee leave -with -pay for an "emergency" or "immediate family death" may be granted by the Department Supervisor, with the approval of the Town Administrator. The leave cannot exceed five (5) consecutive any critical working days. illness "Emergency" means or injury requiring hospitalization or other situation of a critical nature involving a member of the immediate family. "Immediate family" is the employee's spouse, children, grandchildren, brothers, sisters, parents, parents -in-law or grandparents. (Board of Trustees - April 14, 1981). 17 4. Jury Leave An employee may WILL be granted leave with full pay to perform jury duty or serve, under subpoena, as a witness before any court or commission. Any compensation, other than reimbursement of expenses, PAID TO A JUROR WHO SERVES MORE THAN THREE DAYS, (IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL & COLORADO STATE STATUTES), , received by the employee under Such circumctancca shall be refunded to the Town of Estes Park unless the employee elects to have such time charged to annual leave. (Board of Trustees - April 14, 1981). 5. FAMILY LEAVE THE TOWN HEREBY ADOPTS ALL OF THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE "FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1993". IN TAKING ANY LEAVE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, AN EMPLOYEE MUST USE ALL ACCRUED SICK LEAVE AND ANNUAL LEAVE AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF TAKING THE LEAVE. AFTER ALL AVAILABLE ACCRUED SICK AND ANNUAL LEAVE HAS BEEN USED, THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE LEAVE SHALL BE WITHOUT COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS, INCLUDING ACCRUAL OF SICK AND ANNUAL LEAVE, EXCEPT FOR THE CONTINUATION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL HEALTH COVERAGE. IN THE EVENT ANY OF THE ,ROV°TSIONNOF THE TOWN' S PERSONNEL MANUAL ARE MO GENERAOUS.0 THE EMPLOYEE THAN THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT, THE PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN'S MANUAL SHALL CONTROL. T. Holidays The following holidays will be observed and are granted with pay to all permanent employees: Nominal Date Holiday EMPLOYEE DISCRETION FLOATING DAY 18 January 1 February (3rd Monday) May (last Monday) July 4th September (1st Monday) November 11 November (4th Thurs.) December 24 December 25 New Year's Day Washington's Birthday Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Christmas Eve Day Christmas A FLOATING HOLIDAY WILL BE ACCRUED BY ALL FULL-TIME PERMANENT AND PERMANENT PART-TIME EMPLOYEES AT THE FIRST OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. THE FLOATING HOLIDAY SHOULD BE REQUESTED IN ADVANCE AND IS GRANTED AT THE DISCRETION OF EACH EMPLOYEE'S SUPERVISOR. AN EMPLOYEE WILL FORFEIT THE FLOATING HOLIDAY IF NOT USED BY THE LAST DAY OF THE CALENDAR YEAR IN WHICH IT IS ACCUMULATED. Note: PERMANENT part-time employees receive holiday pay on a pro -rated basis. Holidays that occur on a Saturday will be observed on the preceding Friday and those which occur on a Sunday will be observed on the following Monday. Holidays must be taken unless the employee is scheduled to work by the Department Supervisor. Holidays which occur during an employee's absence due to vacation or sickness shall not be counted as vacation or sick leave. Employees, other than Department Supervisors and Public Safety Employees, required to work a holiday, shall be compensated. according to the overtime schedule in Section K. (Board of Trustees - January 10, 1984). Public Safety Employees will receive compensatory time ( ON A STRAIGHT -TIME BASIS) off for holidays worked, and such time off shall be used within twelve (12) months of the time 19 accrued. Employees whose SCHEDULED day off falls on a holiday receive pay for the holiday on a straight -time basis. (Board of Trustees - November 23, 1976; July 7, 1977; July 3, 1978; April 14, 1981). U. Insurance 1. MEDICAL AND DENTAL INSURANCE The Town grants group hospital, medical and dental insurance to all full-time permanent employees and the Board of Trustees. Premiums covering the employee are paid in full by the Town. Family coverage can be obtained by the employee through the same plan. The family premium is partially paid by the Town at the following percentages: Years of Employment Town's Share of Premium 0 through 10 .70% 11+ 75% The Town offers employees and/or their dependents the option to continue their medical and dental coverage for an 18-month* period under the following "qualifying events": • Employees who are terminated for reasons other than gross misconduct. • Employees whose working hours have been reduced. The Town offers employees and/or their dependents the option to continue their medical and dental coverage for a 36-month* period under the following "qualifying events": 20 • Death of employee (beneficiary can continue insurance). • Divorce or legal separation of employee and spouse (both parties may continue insurance). • Employees who become eligible for Medicare coverage. • Dependent child losing "dependent" status under the requirements of the group plan. For continuation of coverage, the employee and/or dependent will be required to pay 100% of the total insurance premium. It will be the responsibility of the employee to notify the Town of changes in status which will affect dependent coverage. This notification must take place within 60 days after the change of status has occurred. No evidence of insurability need be provided for continuation to occur. The continuation coverage must be identical to the coverage offered to other Town employees presently enrolled in the plan. *Coverages will end earlier if: • The employer ceases to provide a group health care plan to its employees. • If premium payments are not met by the insured. • If the insured is re-employed and is covered under another group plan or becomes eligible for Medicare. • If a spouse who is a qualifying beneficiary remarries and is covered under another group health plan. (Board of Trustees - November 23, 1976; June 7, 1977; December 13, 1977; March 25, 1980; April 9, 1985). 21 2. GROUP LIFE INSURANCE ALL FULL-TIME PERMANENT EMPLOYEES ARE COVERED BY THE TOWN FOR LIFE AND ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT INSURANCE. THE EMPLOYEES ARE INSURED AT ONE TIMES ANNUAL SALARY UP TO A $50,000.00 MAXIMUM. (BOARD OF TRUSTEES - JANUARY 28, 1992). 3. FIRE & POLICE PENSION AUTHORITY ALL FULL-TIME PERMANENT NON -CLERICAL PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEES ARE INSURED THROUGH THE STATE FIRE AND POLICE PENSION AUTHORITY (F.P.P.A.) ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT PLA ALL LIMITS AND COVERAGES ARE GOVERNED BY THE COLORADO STATE STATUTES. (BOARD OF TRUSTEES - DECEMBER 1, 1986). 4. MEDICAL PROVIDER THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK HAS DESIGNATED THE ESTES PARK MEDICAL CENTER AS THE PROVIDER OF TREATMENT FOR WORKER'S COMPENSATION INJURIES. ANY EMPLOYEE OF THE TOWN THAT IS INJURED ON THE JOB MUST SEEK TREATMENT AT THE MEDICAL CENTER. (BOARD OF TRUSTEES - JANUARY 28, 1992). V. Educational Assistance The Town of Estes Park encourages its employees to improve their job skills and will, within its current budget, reimburse regular full-time PERMANENT employees for coursework tuition. The requirements for tuition reimbursement are: 1. The employee must complete a "Request for Tuition Reimbursement Form" and obtain approval from the Department Supervisor prior to beginning the course'. 2. The coursework must be job -related or part of an established, approved career plan, and benefit the Town of Estes Park. 22 3. Undergraduate courses must be completed with a grade of "C" or better; graduate courses must be completed with a grade of "B" 'or better. THE EMPLOYEE WILL REIMBURSE THE TOWN IF GRADE LEVEL IS NOT ACCOMPLISHED. 4. As part of the consideration for the Town paying for employee education, employee understands that continued employment with the Town is necessary to enable the Town to benefit from the employee's education. The employee agrees to reimburse the Town for the cost of the education paid by the Town if the employee terminates hio/hcr THEIR employment within one (1) year after completing an individual course or within three (3) years after completing a degree program. The Town has the right to withhold the appropriate sum from the employee's final separation check. 5. Whenever possible, employees are to pursue classes on their own time. When necessary, and upon approval of the Department Supervisor, an employee may be granted a maximum of four (4) hours per week education leave to attend classes. 6. A Department Supervisor must receive the approval of the Town Administrator prior to beginning any course. W. Required Training All, of the costs for training programs or classes, including tuition and books which are required to improve the employee's performance of job assignments and duties, shall be paid by the Town of Estes Park. 23 Requests and suggestions for approved, required training may be initiated by the employee or the employee's supervisor. However, all requests must be approved in advance by the employee's Department Supervisor. All training programs and classes shall be scheduled at a time approved by the employee's Department Supervisor. All hours spent in such training shall be considered time worked. A Department Supervisor must receive the approval of the Town Administrator prior to beginning any training. (Board of Trustees - March 26, 1985). X. Personal Vehicle Usage for Town Business All Town employees required to use their vehicle will be reimbursed at the rate of $.25/mile ESTABLISHED ANNUALLY BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. The responsibility for determining if a vehicle, car allowance, or mileage reimbursement is granted to an employee rests with the appropriate Department Supervisor. Funding of these costs is also the responsibility of the Department Supervisor. Y. Town Vehicle Usage In order to respond to emergency situations and to supervise activities taking place during non -duty hours, the following listed departmental vehicle may be authorized to be driven to the employee's residence for emergency (off -duty) use: Light & Power Department - Foreman & Duty Employee "On Call" 1101'1'11, Public Works Department - Street/Park Superintendent & Fleet Manager Water Department - Water Superintendent & Duty Employee "On Call" 24 Employees, as authorized above, shall use Town vehicles in their possession for official business only. 'Police per3onncl 311311 follow the rulc3 do cribcd in Exhibit 2 (Police Vehicle Rulc3) when using Police vehicic3. Employees who use Town vehicles must follow these procedures: 1. Employees should obey all laws and practice courteous and safe driving habits. Department Supervisors will investigate and take proper disciplinary action if a complaint is filed regarding improper use of a Town vehicle by any employee. 2. Employees who regularly use Town vehicles should be aware of the expiration date of their driver's license and renew their license prior to that expiration date. EMPLOYEES WITH CDL LICENSES WILL BE REVIEWED PER FEDERAL REGULATION REQUIREMENTS. 3. Town vehicles will be used only for official Town business. Employees authorized to use Town vehicles for travel to and from work may make reasonable stops enroute. Under no circumstances will any employee purchase, carry, or imbibe any form of alcoholic beverage while using a Town vehicle. 4. Under no circumstances will any'individual other than a Town employee operate a Town vehicle. 5. Seatbelts must be worn by all passengers during operation of a Town vehicle. Under normal circumstances, Town vehicles shall be refueled only from the Town -owned gasoline pumps located at the Public 25 Works Shop facility. If it is necessary for a vehicle to be driven to a point outside the Estes Park area which will require refueling for the return, specific permission must be granted in advance by the Department Supervisor. Under no circumstances shall privately -owned vehicles be fueled at the Town pumps. (Board of Trustees - March 26, 1985). Z. Vehicle Allowance Authorized Town employees, as identified below, shall be paid a vehicle allowance. The vehicle allowance shall be paid for the use of a private vehicle and the associated operation and maintenance expenses. The private vehicle shall be used for business related activities. Each year the vehicle allowance shall be established in the Town's operating budget. (Board of Trustees - February 14, 1989): Town Administrator Assistant Town Administrator Finance Officer Community Development Director Police Chief Public Works Director Special Events Director The above authorized employees shall insure said vehicle at a minimum of $100,000 for any one person for bodily injury or death, $300,000 for any one accident for bodily injury or death, and $25,000 for property damage. A certificate of insurance shall be filed with the Finance Officer. The Town shall be obligated to reimburse the authorized employee for travel, with a destination outside the Town's service territory, at an authorized rate. Authorized employees shall request reimbursement on a monthly basis, using a Travel Expense Report. 26 AA. HARASSMENT THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK IS COMMITTED TO A WORKPLACE FREE FROM SEXUAL HARASSMENT. EACH EMPLOYEE HAS THE RIGHT TO WORK IN A PROFESSIONAL ATMOSPHERE WHICH PROMOTES EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES, INCLUDING SEXUAL HARASSMENT. AT THE TOWN, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, WHETHER VERBAL, PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL, IS UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS UNWELCOME SEXUAL ADVANCES, REQUESTS FOR SEXUAL FAVORS OR VERBAL/PHYSICAL CONTACT OF A SEXUAL NATURE WHEN: (1) SUBMISSION TO SUCH CONDUCT IS EITHER IMPLIED OR STATED TO BE A TERM OR CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT OR A FACTOR IN THE EVALUATION OF THE EMPLOYEE'S PERFORMANCE, PROMOTABILITY OR ANY OTHER COMPONENT OF EMPLOYMENT; (2) SUCH CONDUCT SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERES, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, WITH AN EMPLOYEE'S WORK PERFORMANCE BY CREATING A HOSTILE, OFFENSIVE OR INTIMIDATING ENVIRONMENT. EXAMPLES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, SEXUALLY VULGAR LANGUAGE, REMARKS ABOUT AN INDIVIDUAL'S PHYSICAL ANATOMY, DEROGATORY COMMENTS ABOUT GENDER, DISTRIBUTION OF WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC SEXUAL MATERIAL, SEXUALLY ORIENTED MAGAZINES/POSTERS, DISPLAY OF NUDE PICTURES, OTHER WORDS OR DEPICTIONS OF A SEXUAL NATURE, PHYSICAL TOUCHING IN A SEXUAL MANNER OR INVADING PERSONAL PRIVACY, ESPECIALLY THE INTENTIONAL TOUCHING OF BREASTS, AND GENITAL AREAS OR BUTTOCKS OR THREATS TO TAKE SUCH ACTIONS. OCCASIONAL COMPLIMENTS OF A SOCIALLY -ACCEPTABLE MANNER OR STATEMENTS OR ACTS THAT ARE ACCEPTABLE TO ALL ELEMENTS OF SOCIETY ARE NOT SEXUAL HARASSMENT. SEXUAL HARASSMENT IS STATEMENTS OR ACTS THAT ARE OFFENSIVE TO SOME PEOPLE. WHAT MAY CONSTITUTE SEXUAL HARASSMENT MAY DIFFER FROM PERSON TO 'PERSO 27 PROCEDURE. ANY EMPLOYEE WHO FEELS SEXUALLY HARASSED BY A SUPERVISOR, CO-WORKER, SUBORDINATE, OR OTHER NON -EMPLOYEES WHO CONDUCT BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN SHOULD TAKE THE FOLLOWING COURSE OF ACTION: 1. TELL THE OFFENDING INDIVIDUAL(S) TO STOP THE HARASSMENT. STATE YOUR OBJECTION TO THE ACTION AND THE SPECIFIC BEHAVIOR TO WHICH YOU OBJECT. HAVE A WITNESS PRESENT IF POSSIBLE. ALSO NOTE THE TIME AND DATE OF THE DISCUSSION AND WRITE A SUMMARY OF WHAT YOU SAID AND HOW THE OFFENDER RESPONDED. IF UNCOMFORTABLE WITH A INDIVIDUAL(S), STATE RETAIN A COPY. 2. IF THE PROCEDURE PROBLEM OR IF YOU DISCUSSION WITH THE HARASSING YOUR OBJECTION IN WRITING AND IN NO. 1 DOES NOT RESOLVE THE FEEL REPRISAL WILL RESULT FROM A COMPLAINT OR IF YOU FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE CONFRONTING THE PARTY, YOU SHOULD FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE: A) REPORT THE ALLEGED ACT IMMEDIATELY TO YOUR DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR. IF YOU DO NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE REPORTING THIS TO YOUR DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR, YOU MAY REPORT THE HARASSMENT TO ANY DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR OR THE ASSISTANT TOWN ADMINISTRATOR. B) IF A COMPLAINT INVOLVES A DEPARTMENT SUPERVISOR, THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE ASSISTANT TOWN ADMINISTRATOR OR TOWN ADMINISTRATOR. C) ALL COMPLAINTS WILL BE HANDLED IN A TIMELY AND CONFIDENTIAL MANNER. NO INFORMATION CONCERNING A COMPLAINT WILL BE RELEASED BY THE TOWN TO THIRD PARTIES OR TO ANYONE WITHIN THE TOWN NOT INVOLVED WITH THE INVESTIGATIO THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROVISION IS TO PROTECT THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE EMPLOYEE WHO FILES A COMPLAINT, TO ENCOURAGE THE REPORTING OF INCIDENTS OF HARASSMENT, AND TO 28 PROTECT THE REPUTATION OF ANY EMPLOYEE WRONGFULLY CHARGED WITH HARASSMENT. D) INVESTIGATION OF A COMPLAINT WILL NORMALLY INCLUDE CONFERRING WITH THE PARTIES INVOLVED AND ANY NAMED OR APPARENT WITNESSES. EMPLOYEES SHALL BE GUARANTEED A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATIO ALL EMPLOYEES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COERCION, INTIMIDATION, RETALIATION, INTERFERENCE, OR DISCRIMINATION FOR,,A COMPLAINT OR ASSISTING IN AN INVESTIGAT TINGHE ISSUE OF WHETHER SEXUAL OR OTHER HARASSMENT HAS OCCURRED REQUIRES A FACTUAL DETERMINATION BASED ON ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE. E) IF THE INVESTIGATION REVEALS THAT A COMPLAINT IS VALID, PROMPT ATTENTION AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION DESIGNED TO STOP THE HARASSMENT IMMEDIATELY AND TO PREVENT ITS RECURRENCE WILL BE TAKEN. ALL DISCIPLINARY ACTION SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE TOWN PERSONNEL MANUAL FOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. EMPLOYEE ACCEPTANCE RECEIPT I have received a copy of the Personnel Policy Manual of the Town of Estes Park, have read it, and understand its terms. I understand that the Personnel Policy Manual is not intended to be acontract between the Town of Estes Park and myself, that the Manual can be changed, at any time, by the Town of Estes Park, and that those changes may apply to me. I acknowledge the fact that I have had an opportunity to ask questions pertaining to the meaning of this Personnel Policy Manual. Signature Date 30 TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: ATTEST: Town Clerk Mayor I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1993, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1993. Town Clerk ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 14.08.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, WITH REGARD TO ELECTRIC AND BARBED WIRE FENCES WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is necessary to add Section 14.08.030 to the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 14.08.030 is hereby added to read as follows: 14.08.030 Electric and Barbed Wire Fences. A. No electrically charged fences shall be installed on any property within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. B. No barbed wire, razor wire or other sharp pointed fences shall be installed on any property within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, except in the CO, CD and I-1 zones, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lowest strand of barbed wire is maintained at least six (6) feet above the adjoining ground level outside the fence. 2. No more than three strands of barbed wire shall be used. 3. Prior to construction of said fences, a permit must be obtained from the Building Inspector of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. C. Any electric fence existing within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado shall be removed on or before the 1st day of April, 1994. D. Any barbed wire, razor wire or other sharp pointed fence existing within the Town of Estes Park, Colorado which does not conform to Paragraph B above shall be removed on or before the 1st day of April, 1998. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , 1993. ORDINANCE #3-93 ELECTRIC AND BARBED WIRE FENCES TRANSCRIPTION Town Board Meeting, March 23, 1993 Mayor: We have an ordinance before us concerning electric and barbed wire fences. Barker: Before we spend a lot of time, I need to go on record that I can't support the ordinance as it's written. If you will refer back to the minutes of the Administrative Committee, and no criticism to Mr. White whatsoever, but it says appropriate exceptions. At the time that we discussed this possible ordinance, I raised a concern about the inevitability of Estes Park growing into the more rural areas, taking on horse properties. We have horse properties in town today, and the needs of those people to use some of these fencing methods to control horses. I still have that concern. I do not believe that this ordinance addresses those concerns. In fact, it is a little more restrictive than probably what we have today. For that reason, I think we need a little more work and possibly a little more discussion and maybe some public input before we pass an ordinance that we are going to live to regret. I still believe that annexation of the entire valley someday is in the best interest of the town and as we do that, we are going to become more rural in nature than we are urban. Mayor: Gary, did you have a comment you wish to make. Klaphake: I don't feel we are in any hurry whatsoever. I think we should just introduce this, gather some input tonight, and take our time. Staff is under no compulsion to move on this fast. It was timely to get it back to you from this January 25th meeting and that's it. It's possible we could write an exemption in there where horses are already permitted -- that would be an exemption also for the fencing. The horses would drive the exemption. Where horses are already permitted by some grandfather and/or if annexation, then it wouldn't trigger this. Barker: I just think we have to be sensitive. We love to have people come out to the Old West. We have a western heritage here. And now we are telling people, and I'm not saying that's the only way that it can be done. But I am certain there are people out there with concerns about this, so ... GK: We will wrestle with that and I would like to hear a little more input and then we will take another crack at it. If that's not right, we'll take another crack at it. If there is any more input, give it to us, please. Gillette: I talked to a landowner who has both barbed and straight fence, and in 20 years he reported to me that two animals have died -- one on the barbed wire, one on straight fence. I know that is a concern here in Estes Park for the wildlife. And I guess this ordinance that bars any electric fence, I would take exception to, because there are fenceless fences that are underground that are electrically charged. Cause this ordinance says any electrically - charged fence. White: I don't consider that a fence under this ordinance, Mr. Gillette. Gillette: This is what the ordinance says. I know what attorneys do with things. White: That was not the intent. Gillette: I also know that I for one have an electric fence at my house to keep my dog in. I mean it isn't a three phase fence that's going to kill someone. I have a number of children in my house, as you all know, and I am quite sure that if any of my children touch this low -voltage electric fence, they won't do it again. It will not harm them. But I also know that my neighbors would not like me to construct a 10 foot fence to keep my dog in, which is an ordinance. So, what do I do -- shoot my dog if I can't have an electric fence? Klaphake or White: Not to be argumentative, but after what Mr. Hartland talked about, I don't know if there are any ways of either having some fences or no fences. I think it's all or none on electric. I can't imagine how there can be a happy medium to that. The one he was complaining about was similar to the one you were just describing. Barker: With due respect in terms of voltage and due respect to Mr. Hartland, I'm not sure it's appropriate to have an ordinance for one individual. Hix: I sense from his request that maybe he would suggest a permit or something for an electric fence. Klaphake: We're going to be in no position to say yes or no. The premise was that he has an accommodations place that goes up to a residential neighborhood. The residential neighborhood put up the fence, and he thought it was uncharacteristic to tourism to have his tourists walk back there and walk into this electric fence. Hix: I'm just speaking of what I heard. Don't mix it with my comments. Mayor: I think it's obvious it needs to be discussed and fine tuned. Dekker: I think when we were discussing that before, I mentioned the fact that it might be handy. I know we've thought about it in the past, to be able to have a fence maybe 20 or 30 feet off from the house just to protect the shrubbery and lawn immediately adjacent to the house. Or maybe still, 50 or 75 feet from the property line where you wouldn't think anyone else, a neighbor or anyone would be bothered by it. I don't know if a provision like that could be made in the ordinance or not. Hix: You mean a setback from the property line? Dekker: Yes. Gillette: I.'m just saying, when you ban something, and again I talk to you about enforcement, there's a lot of barbed wire fence in Estes Park, and I know a number of people who use electrical fences to keep the wildlife out of their newly planted aspens, etc., so I think for a wholesale ban on something -- I can't recall since I've lived here of anyone being injured by an electric fence. Now I know down in Berthoud some hunter was killed when a trencher pulled up a three-phase wire, but that's different than an electric fence. So I don't think you make an ordinance when there hasn't been a problem. Klaphake: What I'm hearing on the electric component, there might be some value in terms of setback and then on the barbed thing there might be some value to recognize the horse permit and those things. I'm trying to find where the middle ground is. Barker: That's all I'm trying to find. My suggestion is that we need to talk about it a little more. White: You also need to talk about the question of grandfathering. The fences that are here, are they gonna be removed or whatever. I think that's a very important part of the discussion. The board needs to realize that. Barker: It would be very difficult to make that retroactive. White: That's a concern that the board needs to ... Barker: I couldn't support that, if that's your question. Mayor: There are some grandfathers here that would object to taking down a fence. Barker: I couldn't support removal of present fences. Habecker: The reason that barbed wire and electric fences are used is that they are cheap and they're effective. We should maybe look at the cheap part of it. There are other ways that are effective. We can pose different types of fencing requirements on people that are going to end up costing a little more money. But maybe -- and at the Cheley Camp, I can't see making him put a rail fence around the whole property and all the rest of it. But in town, I do see some horses that are kept on very small lots. Every bit of the pasture that these animals reside on is nothing but trampled ground, and it's trampled ground right up to the property line and you can see it because it's nothing but a single strand of wire keeping the animal in. It seems in that instance, maybe some sort of a solid fence set back a certain distance from the property line would be a neighborly thing to do. As far as the electric fences to keep dogs in. There are other ways to keep dogs in that don't require an electric fence. They cost more money but I don't know that should be the consideration. Hix: I think there is an ordinance that requires you to set your fence for the horses back from the property line in the city limits. So that's already there. White: But there are some that are not. Hix: If they are in the city limits? White: There are some that are in properties that we are probably going to annex like in Carriage Hills where that restriction isn't there. This is where the grandfather comes in. Hix: That's a different issue. Mayor: It appears it is quite a ways from being to the point of adoption. Let's see what we can work out and get some comments. Klaphake: I hear some good input, but I hear some arguments as to whether they think it is even necessary all together. We will water it down as this input ... Mayor: I think it would be important that some of those that have those types of fences give us pro and con both. Maybe we will need a public hearing that will last all afternoon, but... Klaphake: And Please see me individually if you have any more ideas. Frank Hix: I have some property that abuts the town. It is on the mountainside up here called Big Horn. My father did some strange things with that property that were all related to keep trespassers from getting into that property and otherwise making nuisances of themselves and making the landowner subject to lawsuit. Well, one of my neighbor's children came across the fence, climbed a tree, fell out of the tree, and our insurance had to pay for the damages. We were trying to send a signal that this property is dangerous. And on that ridge up behind the old Stanley House there are some mighty dangerous rocks up there. The fence that we have around that -- and it is barbed wire -- is not to keep horses out or to keep horses in, it is to send a signal that this is very dangerous property. We have lots of signs and my father put up five cases of no trespassing signs. The message is that there is more than keeping animals in. There is a message to try to signal people that there is some dangerous property. 3-6 Dick Carlton: I have owned a piece of property here for about 40 years. And I have barbed wire fences. And I'm gonna have barbed wire fences. This deal of no barbed wires is great for the guy down mainstreet but to keep the public from crossing onto my property and telling me it isn't mine, it's God's -- I want barbed wire to tear their britches up when I kick them out. Mayor: I thought you had horses, Dick. DC: The horses will stay in. I don't worry about the horses. They'll come to feed. The thing is, they excite me when they say, no barbed wire. Now that's getting kind of -- this country was grazed on barbed wire. Bernie can remember when we put up fence after fence of barbed wire. And I can't say this country isn't changing, but I can't see where barbed wire is hurting anybody. If they haven't got brains enough to get out of it, stay away from it, let them tear their pants, I don't care. I'm still gonna keep my barbed wire. Ray Carlton: To Mr. Habecker, the reason a lot of fences are set right on the property line, or in our case, a foot back, is to establish our property line. There are many people that I have discovered in this town who really enjoy using other folk's land for their own recreation. You establish your property line through your fencing and under State of Colorado law, that is a definite given if you are trespassing. You don't need to put up a sign. If they cross that fence, you can have Chief Racine or the Sheriff or whoever is in your jurisdiction come in and arrest them. Most of us ask them to leave. The setback was tried in other counties and other cities and so far from what I've seen, it's been in litigation for a considerable amount of time because it took up so much land of the horse owners and whatever other livestock they had, depending on whether they were in a city. It took up so much time that it wasn't worth the town's considerations. Also, the smooth wire issue, I just came from meeting with the state brand inspector two weeks back. It is not considered consistent with restraining your animals. If a horse goes through it, because it is smooth, it does not offer a form of painful restraint, you are liable for that horse getting struck by an automobile, and if it kills or injures anyone in that vehicle, your own personal money will be put up to pay for it. Certain types of gates and fences used and the smooth wire issue was brought up and he said under most conditions, lawyers can prove that will not restrain a horse. As for the deer and elk getting hung in it, I'm not terribly old, but I've only seen a couple get hung because of the barbs. Most of the time they jam their legs through and do a flip and that's the end of it. But I have seen them hung in other types of fencing. It's a pro and con for you folks. You're the ones who have to decide. I hope you don't make it so restrictive that it's difficult to do anything around here. It is after all our property. Habecker: I have dealt with barbed wire fence and I have been shocked many times by those electric fences. But I think we are talking about the urban setting here. Mayor: We have a lot of ideas here and I'm sure that the staff will be looking for some more and asking for comments. Do you have an administrative report. Klaphake: No, I yield to this. Mayor: Any comments from the board. NONE April 26, 1993 TOWN OF ESTES PARK INVESTMENT POLICY The Town Finance Officer/Treasurer shall be the designated investment officer of the Town. The investment officer shall be guided by State statutes and the "Prudent Investor" rule which states: "Investments shall be made with judgement and care -- under circumstances then prevailing -- which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the income to be derived." (Gerald Miller, "Investing Public Funds") The investment officer shall also comply with the following general policies: Safety of Funds: Investments shall be made in securities which lessen the potential for capital losses arising from changes in market value, credit risk of issuer, and/or default. Investments shall be diversified among as many securities as is practical, but, in any event, no more than 15% of the town's total investments shall be committed to any one investment pool or institution, unless approved by the Town Administrator. Certificates of Deposits of $100,000 each shall be maintained in each of the local banks and savings and loans, as long as the town has adequate funds. Liquidity of Funds: Investments, if possible, shall be made so that maturity dates coincide with dates of disbursement needs. Some funds may be invested on a daily basis as a contingency to allow for uncertainties. Yield: Investment quotations shall be solicited for different securities and from different banks, savings and loans, and brokers in order to determine which securities will provide the greatest yield commensurate with acceptable risk. Consideration will also be given to costs related to the transaction(s) in question. Legality: Investments shall be made according to State statutes and Town of Estes Park policies. Reporting: The investment officer shall at all times keep the Town Administrator fully informed of the town's investments through written weekly reports to the Administrator. These reports shall be signed by the investment officer and the Town 'Administrator. All reports required by State statutes shall be filed in a complete and timely manner. TOWN oroSTESPARK TOWN BOARD GOALS POLICY AGENDA: 1993 KEY: Progress report April 2*, 1993 o % = No Activity us% = Planning sn% = Design/Begin Implementation 750 = Partial Completion o% zs% so% 75% 100% z' Maximize use of the 000fare000 Center. ^ Sign ordered. ^ Use nIao for off-season/local-non-profit to Community Development March 4tb/ Action Plan under developmeot, z' Complete Comprehensive Plan. 10. Overhaul Zoning Ordinance. 00 us& so% 75% z00% ^ Phase II underway. o% 25% so% 75% 1000 u% 25% so% 75% 100% o% 250 sn% 75% 1000 00 250 so% 750 zno% o% us% so% 75% 100% 00 250 50% 75% 100% o% us% so% 75% z00% 00 as% sn% 75% 100% o% 250 500 75% lon% 3. Maintain financial position. ^ Investment Policy to Administrative Committee, April 26th. 4. Plan/promote more Special Events Annual Meeting held March 3rd 5. Encourage development of winter activities. 8. Assist shoulder season development. Economic Study Group completed; report submitted to Community Development on *' Update the capital Improvement Plan.. ^ on bold until Fall zyez. 7. Update Stanley Park/Master Plan. Title work proceeding. e' Determine options for affordable housing. ^ Housing Authority petition submitted, April 7tb, . Public Hearing at Town Board, April 27th. zz. Complete Windy Gap sale. ^ Debt service payments made April lot. Town payments being received on schedule. 12. Develop Park In Ride System. 14' Maximize downtown parking. ^ Park 'n Ride contract to Community Development, May 6th. 13' Encourage strong Cultural Arts program. 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 15. Complete centralized mail delivery. • Preliminary Phase I locations established. • Neighborhood meetings planned for May. 16. Consolidation of EPURA with the Town. • Plan due August 15, 1993. 17. Consolidation of the EVRPD with the Town. • Plan due August 15, 1993. 18. Merging the Estes Park and Upper Thompson Sanitation Districts. • Plan due August 15, 1993. COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK SHARING AGENCY March 8, 1993 Mr. Monte Vavra Town of Estes Park Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80157 Dear Monte: On March 4, I visited the Town of Estes Park to conduct our annual audit of your loss control standards, and to review your losses for 1992. I would like to thank you and Debbie for your time and assistance in this matter. i. ANNUAL LOSS REVIEW In 1992, there were four claims reported that resulted in payment. The cost of these claims to date is approximately $3500. Your claims frequency has significantly dropped over the past 3 year period. It appears that these results are partially due to your ongoing loss control efforts. Keep up the good work! II. AUDIT OF CURRENT LOSS CONTROL STANDARDS Based upon our review with you of those applicable standards, the audit score for your municipality is as follows: CIRSA/PC - .90 Your score(s) from last year are as follows: CIRSA/PC - 88. Attached is a copy of the audit evaluation form which we completed together showing the points awarded for compliance with each individual standard. A 'zero' indicates that the standard was not met, and needs to be addressed in order for you to be in compliance. The following is a list of those areas that were not in compliance with the standard: I I. Incident Response Program VI B. Chlorine Safety VIII E. Seasonal Employee Training X G. Electric Distribution Lines If you are able to obtain records or procedures substantiating your municipalities compliance with any of the above listed standards and send them to us within 30 days, we will adjust your score accordingly. Please note that each item adjusted will add approximately 2.25 points to your score. Our audit reports and evaluations are based upon observations or information available to us at the time of our surveys. We cannot warrant safety, health or compliance with any laws, codes, standards, rules or regulations and do not undertake to perform your duty or the duty of any person to provide for the health or safety of your employees or the public. 6— 1 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 800, Denver, Colorado 80222 (303) 757-5475 (800) 228-7136 FAX (303) 757-8950 FEB FEB 51993 CIRSA Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency COVERAGES innm ; one anuar , ;1, - tor rTi Tim Greer."As demonstrated by ig 993 three sificant the new package we were able to anges went into effect secure in London, the unity and soli- ertaming to Property/ darity of the CIRSA:. organization asualty and Liability coverages, for gives us a great amount of bargain - all CIRSA members.. ` ing power, even at the highest levels, First; recent negotiations in: of the insurance industry." London by CIRSA_.board, and., staff: Assistant Director Beck Fr.nka, representatives resulted in a dra-adds, "Not- only do we. have higher matic enhancement of coverage on limits,but there is also no poolwide behalf of, member communities. aggregate. Each member now has and; Through,. direct= negotiations with° - annual $5 million pool from which to Lloyds of London, $5-million limits pay these types of claims. The added for Errors & Omissions coverages benefit is that we were able to obtain ands Police Professional coverages these,increased` limits at the, same were placed. This enhanced cover-. price."as last year." age was ate no increased cost tot n The. second significant change CIRSA in coverage for 1993 is in the liability is an exciting demonstrate limits related to' the Colorado Gov - ton ofthe strength of poolingtand ernmental Immunity Act. Beginning the leverage it gives to CIRSA mem- on' January 1, liability limits for. Col- bers," said CIRSA-Executive Direc orado governmental entities was in - Story continued on 3. creased from $400,000 to $600 000 per occurrence (the per.Yperson limit re- mains -at- $150,000). In= response, CIRSA has taken on the additional risk by. raising its Liability SIR limit to conform to the government limit of $600000.. The. higher limit' will result; in enhanced` rate stabilization and reduced costs for excessinsur- ance premiums for members. The third change for 1993 per - tams to amendments in ."'fined pay" limits. Starting:January 1, "med:pay" limits were;: reduced to $5,000 per person and $50,000 per occurrence. This reduction benefits members by controlling medical payments which are made on a "no-fault" basis and often d fall within the member's de- ductible level. These changes in coverages for 1993 are; part of CIRSA's on going: effort. to control costs while enhanc- ing: benefits for members. January 1993 rance,anu uic PROTECT AGAINST LIABILITY Don't Let Summer Give You The Liability Blues Summer weddings, art and craft fairs, parades, and festivals are just a few of the activities marking summer fun. If these events are not sponsored by your city or town but use munici- pal facilities or property, you could be courting a liability claim. CIRSA members belonging to the property/casualty pool have liability coverage on existing property and facilities and coverage for any munic- ipal operation on those premises. For instance, the coverage applies (sub- ject, of course, to the applicable terms, conditions and exclusions) if your city or town is sponsoring a fes- tival in one of your own parks. The coverage similarly applies while a private party or organization has permission to use your streets, side- walks, parks or buildings, but in this case, you usually have little to no con- trol over the event. You can accept this risk, of course, and even try to establish control by imposing requirements and working closely with the private user to make sure those requirements are met. While municipal involvement is help- ful, there are no guarantees. If something does go awry — and summer activities draw large crowds which pose the potential of claims — you're exposed, if a liability claim is filed. A claim in itself is expensive, but it also can drive up the cost of your overall coverage. s�1 To protect your city or town, CIRSA suggests strongly that: private parties or organizations not be granted permission to use municipal facilities or property unless they show accep- table proof that they have obtained their own liability insurance, have named your municipality as an addi- tional insured, and have agreed to hold your municipality, its officers, and its employees harmless from liability. a', i a claim is i ed, the user's insurance — not the munici- pality's — becomes the principal source of coverage. Because summer activities do draw large crowds, they probably pose the greatest risk of liability to a municipal- ity. But regardless of the season, your city or town should rigorously require private users to obtain their own lia- bility insurance policy, to name the city or town as an additional insured on the policy, and to use hold -harm- less provisions to protect the munici- pality. Contact Underwriting Manager, Beck Frnka, ext. 813, or Underwriting Assistant, Sharon Smith, ext. 824, for more information.