HomeMy WebLinkAboutVARIANCE Setback 460 Valley Rd 2022-04-05
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Memo
To: Chair Wayne Newsom
Estes Park Board of Adjustment (BOA)
Through: Jessica Garner, AICP, Community Development Director
From: Alex Bergeron, Planner II
Date: April 5, 2022
Application: Variance Request
460 Valley Road
Stanton and Mary Peterson, Owners/Applicants
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of Adjustment approve the variance
request, subject to the findings described in the staff report.
Objective:
The applicant requestsa variance to Table 4-2 of the Estes Park Development Code
(EPDC) to permit a two-foot (2’) setback in place of therequired 25’ front setback on the
north property line.
Location:
460 Valley Road, which Parcel 3523400037, legally described as “COM AT PT 556 FT N,
1000 FT W OF SE COR 23-5-73, S 128 FT, W 155 FT, N 128 FT, E 155 FT TPOB; ALSO COM
AT PT 556 FT N, 1000 FT W OF SE COR, N 22.93 FT, N 89 49' W 40 FT, S 63 1' W 50.5 FT, N
89 49' E TPOB” and hereinafter referred to as “the Property.”
Background:
The Property is located in the E-1 (Estate/1-acre min. lot size) Zone District. The
Property has no street frontage (public or private), is accessedvia gravel drive, which
itself extends off of the driveway of a Religious Assembly use located west of the
property at 450 Valley Road. The acreage of the Propertyis below the zone district
minimum lot size of one acre, and the true acreage of the site is not clear. Larimer
County’sAssessorliststhe Property at0.49 acres,though the true acreageis smaller
because the Assessor considers two separate lots as one lot. The site is actually two
separate lots,perthe legal description (see “also” statement) and two deeds recordedin
1971. The deeds were created before the Town of Estes Park adopted its subdivision
standards, and the Community Development Department has determined the lots to be
separate parcels, as shown on the attached site plan. The two lots do function as one
property, and seem to be conveyed as a couple, but the smaller, upper lot is not being
considered as part of the variance request (see Figure 1: “Subject Parcel” below; and
see alsoAttachment 1: “Application Form,”Attachment 3: “Statement of Intent,”
Attachment 3: “1971 Deeds,” and Attachment 4: “Proposed Site Plan.”).
Figure 1:Subject Parcel
A portion of the existing house, originally built in 1913, encroaches into the 25’ setback
area, including thedeck. A variance for these encroachments was granted by the Estes
Valley Board of Adjustment on May 6, 2008.
Project Description
Overview:
The applicants are seeking a 23-foot setback variance to construct an accessory
structure two feet from the northern property line. The accessory structure would
contain garage space on the lower level, and, if authorized through the Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) process outlined in EPDC §3.16 and §5.2, an Accessory Dwelling Unit
(ADU).
Location and Context
The Property is located in the E-1 (Estate/1-acre min. lot size) Zone District between W.
Wonderview Avenue and W. Elkhorn Avenue (see Figure 2: “Vicinity and Zoning Map”
below).
Figure 2: Vicinity and Zoning Map
Land Use Summary
Table 1: Zoning and Land Use Summary
Comprehensive Plan ZoneUses
Subject
Estate E-1 Single-family Res.
Site
Single-family Res./
North Estate E-1
Vacant
South Estate E-1 Single-family Res.
East Estate E-1 Single-family Res.
West InstitutionalAReligious Assembly
Review Criteria:
The Board of Adjustment is the decision-making body for this application. In accordance
with EPDC§3.6.C.(Variances –Standards for Review), applications for variances shall
demonstrate compliance with the applicable standards and criteria contained therein.
Staff findings on these standards and criteria are outlined below:
§3.6.C.1: Special circumstances or conditions exist.
Staff finding: The Property is unusual in its location, size, and configuration.
§3.6.C.2(a): Whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the
variance.
Staff finding: The Property has been used as a residencefor decades.
§3.6.C.2(b): Whether the variance is substantial.
Staff finding: A 23-foot setback variance represents a 92% encroachment. However,
while the smaller, northern lot is not a factor as a basis of setback distance, the two
parcels have functionally behaved as one for more than 50 years, and the variance may
be of lesser magnitude in terms of neighborhood perception.
§3.6.C.2(c): Alteration to neighborhood character/local detriment.
Staff finding: Primary structures with accompanying accessory structures are common
in the immediate vicinity and in the E-1 Zone District. The proposed structure would
replace an existing shed at the proposed location. (See also comment on §3.6.C.2(b)
above.)
§3.6.C.2(d): Adverse effecton the delivery of public services such as water and
sewer.
Staff finding: All utility agenciesare satisfied with the proposed plans as presented to
the BOA.
§3.6.C.2(e):Whether the Applicant purchased the property with knowledge of the
requirement.
Staff finding: Unknown.
§3.6.C.2(f): Whether the Applicant’s predicament can be mitigated through some
method other than a variance.
Staff finding: It may be possible to position the structure outside of the setback area,
though the position of the existing driveway logically leads to the proposed location and
there could be impacts to stormwater drainage with a different position.
§3.6.C.3:No variance shall be granted if the submitted conditions or
circumstances affecting the Applicant's property are of so general or recurrent a
nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation
for such conditions or situations.
Staff finding: The Property is unusually small relativeto the standards of the E-1 Zone
District, in which lots are intended to be at least one acre in size.
§3.6.C.4: No variance shall be granted reducing the size of lots contained in an
existing or proposed subdivision if it will result in an increase in the number of
lots beyond the number otherwise permitted for the total subdivision.
Staff finding: Deeds recorded in 1971 showthe two lots in their current form before the
Town adopted its subdivision standards and are considered legitimate designators of
metes and bounds.
§3.6.C.6: No variance for non-permitted use.
Staff finding: The residential use is permitted by right in the E-1 Zone District.
§3.6.C.7: BOA may grant conditions to ensure objectives are met.
Staff finding: Staff does not recommend additional conditions.
Reviewing Agency Comments:
This request has been routed to reviewing agency staff for review and comment.
Comments received were either neutral or in favor of the request (see Attachment 5:
“Agency Review Comments”).
Public Notice:
Staff provided public notice of the application in accordance with Town and State public
noticing requirements. As of the time of writing this report, several telephoned public
inquiries were received and no written comments have been received for the variance
request.
Written notice was mailed to adjacent property owners on March 17, 2022.
Legal notice was published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette on March 18, 2022.
Application was posted on the Town’s “Current Applications” website as of March 18,
2022.
“Development Proposal Under Review” sign was posted at the Property prior to that
date (see Attachment 6: “Posted Notice”).
Advantages:
Approval of the variance request would permit the owners a reasonably sized
accessory structure. Accessory structures are not uncommon in the E-1 Zone
District, which is a semi-rural, lower density zoning designation.
Development of an ADU, if permitted through the CUP process, would create
additional housing in Estes Park. The community is currently facing a housing
shortage.
This proposal may advance Comprehensive Plan Community Wide Policy 5.2 –
the creation of housing for permanent residents of all sectors of the community
that is integrated into and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods.
Disadvantages:
The setbackvariance requested could be perceived as very substantial, which
calls the purpose of setbacks into question.
Action Recommended:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of thevariance request, based on staff findings listed
above.
Finance/ResourceImpact:
N/A
Level of Public Interest:
Low.
Sample Motion:
I move that the Board of Adjustment APPROVE the variancerequest, in accordance
with the findings as presented.
I move that the Board of Adjustment deny the variance request, finding that \[state
findings for denial\].
I move that the Board of Adjustment continue the variance request to the next regularly
scheduled meeting, finding that \[state reasons for continuance\].
Attachments:
1. Application Form
2. Statement of Intent
3. 1971 Deeds
4. Proposed Site Plan
5. Agency Review Comments
6. Evidence of Posted Notice
See"PresentSituation"instaffreport-AEB
Thispointisnotclear.The11'
setbackwouldonlyapplyifthe
lotswereconsideredtobe
one.Whileacouple,theyare
separateparcels-AEB
N
Actioncommentsresolved
3/23/2022-AEB
April 5, 2022
Lonnie Sheldon
Van Horn Engineering
1043 Fish Creek Road
Sent via email to: lonnie@vanhornengineering.com
RE: Peterson Variance
Dear Lonnie:
Please be advised that the Estes Park Board of Adjustment, at its public hearing held on
April 5, 2022, voted to approve the request for a 23-foot setback variance along the north
property line of the subject parcel at 460 Valley Road to support the construction of an
accessory structure, as illustrated in Figure 1.. This approval was made with the
following condition:
1. A setback certificate shall be submitted to the Community Development Department
following construction to evidence compliance with the approved setback distance.
The building permit must be obtained within one (1) year of this approval or the approval
will be null and void.
Please contact me at 970.577.3729 or abergeron@estes.org if you have any questions.
Regards,
Alex Bergeron
Planner II
cc: John Bostron, Aldrich Builders
170 MACGREGOR AVE. P.O. BOX 1200, ESTES PARK CO. 80517 WWW.ESTES.ORG
/ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ 5ĻƦğƩƷƒĻƓƷ ВАЉΏЎААΏЌАЋЊ
tƌğƓƓźƓŭ 5źǝźƭźƚƓ ƦƌğƓƓźƓŭθĻƭƷĻƭ͵ƚƩŭ
Figure 1:
170 MACGREGOR AVE. P.O. BOX 1200, ESTES PARK CO. 80517 WWW.ESTES.ORG
/ƚƒƒǒƓźƷǤ 5ĻǝĻƌƚƦƒĻƓƷ 5ĻƦğƩƷƒĻƓƷ ВАЉΏЎААΏЌАЋЊ
tƌğƓƓźƓŭ 5źǝźƭźƚƓ ƦƌğƓƓźƓŭθĻƭƷĻƭ͵ƚƩŭ