HomeMy WebLinkAboutDOCUMENTS Black Canyon Inn DP 00-03Town of Estes Park
Community Development Department
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor Baudek
Board of Trustees
Town Administrator Widmer
From: Alison Chilcott, Planner II and Bob Joseph, Director
Date: March 7, 2003
Subject: Request for Extension of Vested Rights for Development Plan 00-
03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition
Background.
The applicant, Jim Sloan, has requested an extension of the three year vested rights
period for Development Plan #00-03A. February 6, 2003 and February 15, 2003 letters
from the applicant requesting this extension are attached. The February 15th letter
requested a two year time extension and stated that it is Town policy to limit the
exension to one year. This is not a Town policy and the Town Board can approve a two
year vested rights extension.
The Estes Park Planning Commission approved Development Plan #00-03A on March
21, 2000 and vesting expires on March 21, 2003. The plan was reviewed and approved
as compliant with the prior zoning code. Approval of a vested rights time extension will
allow the applicant to build as shown on development plan #00-03A, i.e. the
development plan will not be revised to comply with current Estes Valley Development
Code standards.
This request has been submitted to all
applicable reviewing agency staff and
property owners within 100 feet of the
property for consideration and comment.
Letters were received from the Estes Park
Sanitation District, Town Light and Power
Department, and Town Attorney. The
Sanitation District has no concerns about the
request. The Light and Power Department
and Town Attorney have no comment.
A neighbor expressed concern about the
proximity of the proposed development to MacGregor Ranch to the north and east. The
N Location Map for 800 MacGregor Avenue
A0 425 850 1,700 2,550 3,4Teet
setback to this property under the prior zoning code twenty-five feet; however, the
applicant received a variance to build fifteen feet from the property line. If this
extension is not granted, development must comply with the Estes Valley Development
Code twenty five foot setback, unless another variance is granted.
If this plan was reviewed for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code plan
revisions may be necessary, including revisions to comply with current building/yard,
wetlands and stream setbacks, current parking lot design standards and to limit
disturbance to rock outcroppings. It is verly likely that the proposed development plan
would comply with current density requirements; however, staff does not have enough
information to provide an accurate density calculation.
Town Board approval of a vested rights extension requires a Town Board finding that
economic conditions and project complexity necessitate a longer vested rights period than
the three year period required by state law.
Budget.
None.
1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200
Estes Park, Colorado 80517
Phone: (970) 586-2458
Fax: (970) 586-2459
Website: ces-ccc.com
9/28/06
Bob Joseph
Community Development Director
The Town of Estes Park
Bob,
Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. will be making some
improvements to the Black Canyon Inn project that will make the project
safer and more compliant with the EVDC. The area indicated on the latest
site plan as "proposed unpaved parking" will now be paved and concrete
wheel stops will be installed. Also, a crane will be removing the boulders
located closest to the edge of the cut bank to the East. The crane is scheduled
for next Wednesday, October 3. Please visit the site after that date and see if
you are still concerned with the condition of the bank.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying Inc.
Ben Greer, Project Manager
CORNE
ENGINEERING &
STONE
9/13/06
SURVEYING. INC
Bob Joseph
Community Development Director
The Town of Estes Park
Bob,
1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200
Estes Park, Colorado 80517
Phone: (970) 586-2458
Fax: (970) 586-2459
Website: ces-ccc.com
Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc has been hired by Jim Sloan of
the Black Canyon Inn to perform both engineering services and as a General
Contractor. The original site plans for the project were composed by the
architect, Kenney and Associates. As the original site plan contained several
inaccuracies and did not reflect the desires of the owner, we revised the site
plan. Enclosed is the latest site plan for your use. CES requests that the
current permit for the 10 unit lodge (building F) be allowed to conform to
this latest site plan.
We realize some of the work performed at the site deviated slightly from the
original site plan. Areas where cut materials were stockpiled shall be
reshaped and revegitated. In addition, CES is in the process of preparing a
new development plan that will comply with the current Estes Valley
Development Code. CES will submit this plan to your department for
approval before any more permits are applied for.
Your patience and understanding are appreciated.
Sincerely,
Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying Inc.
Ben Greer, Project Manager ferry "rochaska, Principal
Community
Development
Town of Estes Park
May 30, 2006
Jim Sloan
Black Canyon Inn
800 MacGregor Ave.
Estes Park, Co. 80517
Dear Mr. Sloan:
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, Co. 80517
File : (3ui1I:AS
r`-'^`;PlarN
F; l e.4eao-C13
I have recently reviewed your revised site plans, and visited the site. First, I want to acknowledge that
the site plan revisions produced by Cornerstone look to be an improvement over the old plan and they
may also be found to be code compliant once they are reviewed through the required process.
However, I am concerned on two main points: 1) Recent site work has departed from the plan
approved in 2000 to a degree that staff is no longer able to process these changes as minor revisions
to the old plan. 2) The recent placement of fill material in several locations on the site in preparation for
new parking and building sites has not been properly authorized and permitted. The current building
permit does not extend beyond scope of work actually shown on the plans submitted with that permit.
Having looked at the fill already in place for new parking areas it is evident that we need to update your
old approval, that is to say you need to prepare a master plan for the whole property that accurately
reflects current existing conditions (newly placed fill) and your most current planning for new
improvements. At this point we have no choice but to review that plan under the new code (EVDC).
Please begin preparation of this development plan update in conformance with the submittal
requirements found in the Estes Valley Development Code. You must submit a complete revised set to
this office no later than July 14th 2006. In the event you fail to make this submittal date you will be
required to remove all unauthorized fill and return the site to original grade and vegetation.
Please discontinue all general grading and paving work and retaining wall construction, except as
shown on building permits issued, until a revised development plan is approved. Also please submit a
height elevation certificate by Friday, June 2, 2006. Site work on underground utilities consistent with
building permits issued may continue.
I also recommend you make an appointment to meet with our planning staff and your engineer as soon
as possible to review the details of our current code requirements as they apply to your property.
Sincerely,
Bob Joseph, LA, AICP
Director
Cc: Cornerstone Engineering
)/14/ Inc.
March 15, 2005
Mr. Bob Joseph
Board of Trustees
Town of Estes Park
170 MacGregor Avenue
Estes Park CO 80517
Re: Proposed Accommodation Zoning Restrictions
Ladies and Gentlemen:
... an intimate mountain resort
Pursuant to my letter of March 4, will provide more information pertinent to my
particular situation and the continued development of the Black Canyon Inn property at
800 MacGregor Avenue.
I purchased the property in November of 1992. Although it had been a resort
property since the late 60's, it had been utilized as "low income housing" for the year and
a half preceding my acquisition. 1 reopened the cabins and restaurant in 1993 and began
planning for the replacement of the outdated Stead's Ranch era cabins that had been
moved to the property. Beginning in 1995, substantial utility upgrades( approx.
$300,000 in water, sewer, gas, electric, cable and telephone) have been completed as a
prelude to the overall development of the 14 acre parcel. Some of these projects are of
direct benefit to the town as a whole as they were components of your water, system
upgrade that will continue for many more years.
The first buildings were designed and completed in 1995. Each unit was designed
so that it could be converted in the future if necessitated by financial or other causes. The
second phase, 4 additional buildings, was begun in 2000. As you know, you approve
development plans for a three-year term. From 95 through 00, we had enjoyed steady
growth in business levels. In early 2001, the nation's economic decline had an effect on
our summer bookings and the disaster in NY sealed 2001 as a less than ideal business
year. For that reason, I postponed the construction of the next lodge building. The
following 3 years continued with lackluster growth in our market (as well as the
additional inventory available to tourists in the area), and school calendars around the
country have compressed our family market (still the mainstay of our summer season)
into a 6 or 7 week peak period. I have been hard pressed to justify expanding my
inventory. After exhausting every personal means of mitigating this economic reality
while remaining confident in the appeal of Estes Park to tourists, I began the conversion
process for the units in order to provide the funding mechanism to be able to fulfill my
development plan and to move on to addressing the final phase of developing the
property. I appreciate that the town did allow me an extension of the plan, which is
currently proceeding. Colorado Statute also applies time constraints regarding
800 MacGregor Avenue
Estes Park, CO 80517
Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com
E-mail: info@blackcanyoninn.com
Phone: (970) 586 8113
Fax: (970) 586 5123
condominiums, which will force me to have completed the final phase of development
within the next six years.
As a 34 year resident of the community, I have worked hard to shepherd the
properties with which I have been involved. I believe that I have made tasteful choices
that lend to a harmonious land use and been judicious with density planning in order to
preserve the character of this magnificent piece of property. As I have invested
everything that I have in this project, I ask that, should you pass this measure, the balance
of the project would be exempted from the new restrictions. The condo declarations
allow for a maximum of 77 units. With the completion of the present phase, I will focus
on a plan for the "upper" portion of the property. As you are aware, it has a residential
nature because of the adjacent condo and single family uses presently there.
I remain eager to discuss this with you and to come to an understanding for the
mutual benefit of both visitors and residents of the Black Canyon Inn.
Sincerely,
Jn'S'`. an
'Cc: John Baudek
Sue Ioylen
David Habecker
Lori Jeffrey -Clark
Chuck Levine
Wayne Newsom
Bill Pinkham
Black Canyon Development Plan #00-03A
3/6/03
# of Units Per Building
Unit#5 1
Building A 4
Building B 4
Building C 4
Building D 4
Building E 4
Building F 12
Building H 4
Building G 4
Relocated Units X 4
Existing to Remain 3
Restaurant l t2s ► l ry orr" 3v,-„fS
Conference Center
hl-units
32
2
a
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
i
Jim Sloan
Black Canyon Inn, Inc.
800 MacGregor Avenue
PO Box 856
Estes Park, CO 80517
Re: The Lodges at Black Canyon Inn Condominiums
Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue
Dear Mr. Sloan:
Vested rights for Development Plan #00-03A for the above referenced property expire on
March 21, 2005. Permit #M-007-05 (formerly #M-006-05) has been issued for
demolition of cabins. Provided a building permit is submitted for construction prior to
March 21, 2005, vested rights will not expire on that date.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact me (577-3720) at your convenience.
Sincerely,
4ANrIcvaafro
Alison Chilcott, AICP
Planner II
http://www.estesnet.com
(970) 586-5331 • P.O. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816
--,a/nycott
)/1111 Inc -
February 7, 2005
Ms. Alison Chilcott
Community Development Dept.
Town of Estes Park
Estes Park CO 80517
Allison,
... an intimate mountain resort
Currently, we are executing Permit # M-006-65 for the
demolition of the cabins to make way for the next of the buildings
on our development plan. Due to a delay in the architect
delivering the plans and final engineering for;. submittal to the
building department, we may not have the footings in place by the
expiration of the current approval period next month. I am
requesting an extension of one year to allow the work to continue
as approved.
For your information, I have engaged Cornerstone
Engineering to oversee this phase of the plan and continue to use
Kenney & Associates Architects.
Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
41,,_
1, Sloan
ack Canyon Inn, Inc
loan Investments, Inc.
800 MacGregor Avenue
Estes Park, CO 80517
Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com
E-mail: info@blackcanyoninn.com
Phone: (970) 586 8113
Fax: (970) 586 5123
TOWN OF ESTES PARK P. O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517
FAX
Date: 1/13/2004
Number of pages including cover sheet 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
To: Don Claassen
Lot 23, Black Canyon Hills
Phone #: 586-1885
Fax #: 586-1885
cc:
From: Alison Chilcott, Planner II
Phone #: (970) 577-3720
Fax #: (970) 586-0249
e-mail: achilcott@estes.org
REMARKS: 0 Urgent 0 For your review 0 Reply ASAP 0 Please comment
Re: Black Canyon Development Plan
Attached is the portion of the Development Plan for Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers
Addition #00-03 showing the area closest to your lot, Lot 23, Black Canyon Hills. This plan was approved
on March 21, 2000. The three year vesting period expired on March 21, 2003 and was extended for an
additional two years by Town Board. If a building permit is not pulled by March 21, 2005 and Town Board
does not grant another extension of the vesting, resubmittal of a development plan will be required prior to
build additional units, unless less than three additional units are proposed on the lot.
The approved development plan was reviewed for compliance with the old zoning code. A new
development plan would be reviewed for compliance with Estes Valley Development Code which became
effective on February 1, 2000. Compliance with this Code may result in the need for a different site
plan/building layout. The twenty-five foot minimum building setback from your property line would remain
the same. Additional parking lot screening may be required for a parking lot with six or more spaces.
I've also included a letter to Jim Sloan notifying him of the extension.
HP Fax Series 900
Plain Paper Fax/Copier
Fax History Report for
Town of Estes Park
970-586-0249
Jan 13 2004 4:42pm
Last Fax
Date Time Type Jdentification ,Duration Pages Result
Jan 13 4:39pm Sent 5861885 1:07 3 OK
Result:
OK - black and white fax
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
April 4, 2003
Jim Sloan
Black Canyon Inn
800 MacGregor Avenue
PO Box 856
Estes Park, CO 80517
Re: Development Plan Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers
Addition #00-03A
Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue
Dear Mr. Sloan:
The Estes Park Town Board reviewed the vested rights extension request for
Development Plan #00-03A for Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers
Addition on Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at the regular monthly meeting. At that time, the
Town Board voted to recommend APPROVAL of a two year extension of the vested
rights period.
The Estes Park Planning Commission approved Development Plan #00-03A on March
21, 2000. The three year vesting period which would have expired on March 21, 2003
has been extended for two years. Vesting will expire on March 21, 2005.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact me (577-3720) at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Alison Chilcott, AICP
Planner II
cc: Paul Kochevar, Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers, Inc.
http://www.estesnet.com
(970) 586-5331 • P.O. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816
Town of Estes Park
Community Development Department
Memo
To: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk
From: Alison Chilcott, Planner II sC
Date: April 7, 2003
Subject: Two Year Vested Rights Extension for Development Plan 00-03A for
Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition
Jim Sloan requested a vested rights extension for Development Plan #00-03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a
Portion of Meyers Addition which expired on March 21, 2003. The Town Board minutes state that a vested
rights extension was granted for Development Plan #00-03 rather than #00-03A. Please let me know if this
should be corrected in the minutes or if a memo to the file is sufficient.
North Park Place
1423 West 29th Street
Loveland, Colorado 80538
GREGORY A. WHITE
Attorney at Law
February 26, 2003
ALISON CHILCOTT, PLANNER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
PO BOX 1200
ES 1'ES PARK, CO 80517
970/667-5310
Fax 970/667-2527
Re: Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums — 800 MacGregor Avenue
Dear Ms. Chiicott:
I have no comment.
If you have any questions, pleas: do not hesitate to give me a call.
trul yours,
A. White
GAW/ldr
Cc: Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers
Fax: 970/586-5816
Estes Park Sanitation District
PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 80517
February 25, 2003
Alison Chilcott, Planner
Town of Estes Park
PO Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517-1200
RE: Time extension on development plan Lot 1, Mount View Park (Jim Sloan)
Dear Alison Chilcott,
Upon review of the time extension request for the above mentioned property, the Estes Park
Sanitation District has the following comment:
1. The District has no problem with the time extension request for his development plan at
800 MacGregor Avenue.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this review.
Sincerely,
James Duell
District Manager
Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 gig Thompson Ave 970.586.3516
Fax: 970.586.4712
TOWN of ESTES PARK
Inter -Office Memorandum
January 21, 2003
TO:
Alison Chiicott
Planner
FROM: Todd Steichen
Acting Line Su
tendent, Light and Power Department
SUBJECT: The Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums
Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition
800 MacGregor Avenue
The Light and Power Department has no comments.
TS/lb
Jim Sloan
Black Canyon Inn
800 MacGregor Avenue
PO Box 856
Estes Park, CO 80517
TOWN OF ESTES PARK
February 14, 2003
Re: Development Plan Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers
Addition #00-03 and #00-03A
Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue
Dear Mr. Sloan:
f As noted in your February 6, 2003 letter to Bob Joseph, the current development plan,
Dons. originally approved on March 21, 2000, will expire on March 21, 2003. The Estes Park
z _ i 8-om Town Board will review your request for an extension of the vesting period at the 7:00
p.m., Tuesday March 11, 2003 meeting, provided you submit a revised letter stating the
requested extension period, e.g. one additional year, and nine copies of the amended
development plan by 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 18, 2003 and.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact me (577-3720) at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Alison Chilcott, AICP
Planner II
cc: Paul Kochevar, Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers, Inc.
http://www.estesnet.com
(970) 586-5331 • P.O. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816
TOWN OF ESTES PARK P. O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517
FAX
Date: 2/12/03
Number of pages including cover sheet: 7
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
To: Greg White
Phone #: 667-5310
Fax #: 667-2527
CC:
From: Alison Chilcott
Phone #: (970) 577-3720
Fax #: (970) 586-0249
e-mail: achilcott@estes.org
REMARKS: 0 Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP 0 Please comment
RE: Black Canyon and Lots 2&3 Rock Acres Subdivision
Black Canyon. I'm assuming this attached request for a vesting extension needs to published
and go to Town Board next month with a staff report. Though I don't see a reason to recommend
approval.
Lots 2&3 Rock Acres subdivision. Once you've reviewed the attached letter, I'd like to talk to ou
about a couple issues.
2- / y C&.Yv. OCn ( 1.
2- i 4
". ASll1;sz-f ce-K-c (g_
pC Qv. C.e
Revised: 12/99
2 OO m y
i)'r S 7 c-47 1.) ;1 / rev
4414/011.
)/14/
Inc.
February 15, 2003
Mr. Bob Joseph
Community Development Dept.
Town of Estes Park
Estes Park CO 80517
Bob,
... an intimate mountain resort
Alison requested a more specific request relating, to my
February 6 letter regarding an extension on my current
development plan. I would appreciate a two year extension to be
considered, however, it is my understanding that your policy
allows for one year only. If that is the case, I will make every effort
to work within the one year allowance if that is possible.
I would consider some minor building modifications to the
plans I have prepared, if it would address any changes in code that
might have occurred.
Paul and I would be happy to meet before the commission
meeting to address any issues you may have.
Sirerely,
. ini Sloan
Black Canyon Inn
970-586-8113
cc: Paul Kochevar, EP Surveyors
800 MacGregor Avenue
Estes Park, CO 80517
Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com Phone: (970) 586 8113
E-mail: infoCOlackcanyoninn.com Fax: (970) 586 5123
... an intimate mountain resort
2/14/ Inc.
February 6, 2003
Mr. Bob Joseph
Community Development Director
Town of Estes Park
Estes Park CO 80517
Bob,
As you are aware, my current development plan will expire on March
21 of this year. Due to the poor economic performance of the resort over the
past two years, I have been unable to proceed with the proposed
construction. Is there an opportunity for an extension period to be
considered on all or any parts of the plan. I have invested considerable time
and resources into the plan and am constantly pressing to continue with it.
My attention has been focused and architectural work completed on the 13-
suite lodge at the northwest corner of the resort. I would be especially
interested in a continuance on at least' that portion of the project.
I am available at any time to meet if you have comments on this
possibility. Paul Kochevar will be able to meet with us if we can schedule a
time. Thank you for your consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Ji Sloan
Black Canyon Inn
70-586-8113
800 MacGregor Avenue
Estes Park, CO 80517
Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com
E-mail: info@blackcanyoninn.com
Phone: (970) 586 8113
Fax: (970) 586 5123
TO:
All Affected Agencies
FROM: Alison Chilcott
Planner
SUBJECT: The Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums
Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition
800 MacGregor Avenue
February 20, 2003
Enclosed please find letters from Jim Sloan requesting a time extension for Development Plan
00-03 for the above referenced property. This request was submitted by James Sloan and will be
considered by the Town Board of Trustees on Tuesday, March 11, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Board Room of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado.
Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible, but no
later than March 3, 2003. You are always welcome to attend this meeting.
NOTE: Please send (or fax) a copy of your comments to the applicant or his/her agent at the
address or fax number shown below:
Enclosures
Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers
P.O. Box 3047
Estes Park, CO 80517
Fax: 970-586-5816
GIPAEc DR AVIF..INUE
ES PARK, CO 80.5 7 '* FAX (970) 586..2816
February 20, 2003
TO:
Adjacent Property Owner
FROM: Alison Chilcott
Planner
RE: The Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums
Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition
800 MacGregor Avenue
Applicant: James Sloan
Enclosed for your information are copies of letters from Jim Sloan requesting a time extension
for Development Plan 00-03 for the above referenced property which is adjacent to yours.
This item will be considered by the Town Board of Trustees on March 11, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Board Room of the Municipal Building. You are welcome to attend this meeting.
Should you have any questions, desire additional information, or would like to comment on the
proposed request, please contact me at the address or telephone number listed below.
Enclosures
9.1
111:1, net corn
IBO.X 1 70 MAC i,.YlRII:::C a- R AVENUE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 * FAX d,°-
Community
Development
Town of Estes Park
January 2, 2001
Mr. Paul Kochevar
Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers
Re: Black Canyon Development Plan
Dear Paul:
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, Co. 80517
There are several conditions with this approval that I would like to ask you to address prior to accepting
the final mylar. These are items 1, 2, and 4 on the attached minutes.
Sincerely,
Bob Joseph
Senior Planner
••*Oro•• n!•U•MINO CO.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Planning Commission — March 21, 2000 Page 3
Estes Park Surveyors, representing the applicant, reviewed his memo
dated March 21, 2000, and answered questions from Commissioners.
Drainage easements will be determined prior to time of building permit.
Commissioner Pohl requested a corrected time/date notation of EPS fax
machine.
There was no public comment.
It was moved and seconded (Burgess/Clark) to approve Development
Plan 00-04, Lot 4, Beaver Point 3rd Addition with the following
conditions. Motion passed. Those voting yes: Pohl, Burgess, Sager,
Clark. Those voting no: Thomas, Hix.
1. Prior to issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy on this site, all
required planting improvements shall be installed or guaranteed.
2. The proposed contours for relocation of existing drainage easement
and natural drainage swale shall be added to the plan.
3. Vacation of the existing drainage easement as originally platted, and
dedication of a new, recorded easement shall be accomplished prior to
issuance of a building permit on this site.
4. The plan shall provide 100 new shrubs, or alternatively, thirty new trees
(total) in addition to previous landscape requirements.
5. Requirements made by Public Works Director in his memo dated
February 9, 2000, shall be met.
6. A vicinity map shall be added to the plan.
7. A new Improvement Guarantee shall be submitted and approved by
staff.
b. Development Plan 00-03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of
Meyer's Addition, Black Canyon Inn, James Sloan/Applicant. Paul
Kochevar reviewed the proposal. It was determined that it was
inappropriate to split the lot. Staff noted that combustible materials
could not be used in the walkway within the setbacks to comply with the
building code. A note will be added that the UBC as well as the ADA
requirements for accessibility will be met. At least one handicapped
parking space will be added to each area (restaurant, conference
center, accommodation units). Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the
Staff recommendations. The location of the sewer line in the southwest
corner is dependent upon the possible future development in that area;
therefore, the final engineering will be postponed until future
development is determined.
There was no public comment.
It was moved and seconded (Thomas/Pohl) to approve
Development Plan 00-03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of
Meyer's Addition with the following conditions, and it passed
unanimously.
1. All EPSD requirements shall be met. All proposed new utility lines
shall be shown on the plan, and easements provided as required.
Design plan and profile for new sewer lines and their associated
easements should be reviewed and accepted by EPSD prior to
approval. Dedication of required new utility easements and
abandonment of old easements shall be recorded with Larimer
1.11A9roNOIUCU WINO CO.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Park Planning Commission — March 21, 2000 Page 4
county, prior to requesting building permits for the units next to Black
Canyon Creek.
2. The plan shall identify locations for future expansion of the parking to
a total of 140 spaces, so that the parking demand can be met in the
future if in fact the proposed 108 spaces prove not to be adequate.
The applicant shall fumish a detailed parking analysis on a separate
written form demonstrating that adequate parking is provided.
3. All buildings shall be given a unique label or designation on the plan.
Floating building labels that appear in error shall be removed.
4. Handicap Accessible units and access must be provided as
identified in the Chief Building Official's memo dated January 4,
2000, to include deletion of the note regarding the 1 to 100 ratio.
The plan shall show all required handicapped parking spaces,
approved by the Town Building Official.
5. A Floodplain Development Permit is required prior to construction of
units in the southwest comer as noted in the Chief Building Official's
memo dated January 4, 2000.
There being no further business, Chair Sager made closing remarks regarding this
last meeting of the Estes Park Planning Commission and adjourned the meeting at
3:08 p.m.
Al Sager, Chair
Meribeth Wheatley, Recording Secretary
FRE1i1 :
FAX NO. :
Aug. 19 1999 10:25PM P1
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
FROM:
ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC.
Peet Office (tax 3847 Telephone 970-586-5175
Estes Park, CO 80517 PAX received at 970.686-5814
JANUARY 14, 2000
FAX NO. 970-58S-024s
TO; BOB JOSEPH AT TOWN OF ESTES PARK
No. of sheets including cover sheet a.....,
Re: Tiny Town Cottages & Black Canyon Inn & Beaver Point Third
Jim Sloan needs to proceed with the construction of the building next to the church if at all
possible or he will not have time to get it built before the season peaks. Would you consider a
development plan revision that only finalized the aspects directly associated with this building.
All the utility lines are in place at this particular site and the parking just needs restructuring and
asphalt We could even prepare a drawing that only indicates this building as it is on the
computer and it is simple to start erasing all the other new parts. We would also hold off on the
amended plat until the development plan can accompany it's review -
We did not receive any of the comments for any of the projects from Linnane, EPSD or ? Greg
dirt send his directly to us.
We will proceed with the amended plat for Tiny Town Cottages this next week. Could we meet
next week to review another layout of lots?
We will proceed with a development plan for Jack Williams project. This would be for the lot in
the middle of his project. Could we meet next week to review a layout of these units?
If you need additional information or have any questions, please contact us.
Paul Kochevar
cc: Jim Sloan
Date: 1-12-00
Title: Black Canyon Inn Development Plan 00-03, Lot 1 and 2 Mount View Park/Meyers
Location: MacGregor Ave. North of the Bypass
Applicant: Jim Sloan
I. SITE DATA
Engineer: EP Surveyors and Engineers
Number of lots: One existing, Two proposed
Size of lots: 1.9 acres and 12.9 acres
Existing Zoning: CO -Commercial Outlying
Existing Land Use: Commercial Accommodations and Restaurant
Water: Town
Sewer: EPSD
Access: MacGregor Ave.
IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a proposal to add two four-plex buildings, one twelve-plex building, and one tri-
plex building to Lot 1. Also, to build two four-plex buildings on the newly created Lot 2.
The total accommodations units on Lot 1 would be 52. The total units on Lot 2 would be
8. The new construction would involve relocation of existing cabins to be used as
employee housing as indicated on the plan.
III. PROJECT REVIEW
The applicant should furnish a detailed density calculation for both lots that includes
identification of all units with kitchens noted (dwelling units) or motel units noted, if any.
The units should be clearly labeled on the plan sheet as either dwelling units or motel
units. It does appear that both lots have adequate land area to support the proposed
density.
A variance has been granted to reduce the building setback for the four-plex next to the
church.
drainage: Drainage will flow to Black Canyon Creek without detention. The site grading
plan for construction of new parking lots and drives should be carefully prepared to ensure
proper handling of surface run-off.
parking: The applicant should furnish a detailed parking analysis demonstrating that
adequate parking is provided. Any shared parking or reduced employee parking
assumptions should be specifically identified. It appears that parking as shown may be
adequate if shared parking is assumed between the units, restaurant, and employee
housing.
surfacing: All parking and drives should be asphalt, and this should be noted on the plan.
fire: ISO calculations have been provided on the revised plan. The Fire Chief should have
an opportunity to review and comment on the revised plan. It is expected that the
proposed new hydrants will be adequate. These should be clearly labeled.
utilities: (see correspondence) The EPSD has identified several requirements in their
review of this proposal. All EPSD requirements should be met. All proposed new utility
lines should be shown on the plan, and easements provided as required. Design plan and
profile for new sewer lines and their associated easements should be reviewed and
accepted by EPSD prior to approval.
other:
Wetlands should be mapped and identified on the Development Plan.
A note should be added to the plan stating: "The Developer shall be responsible for
erosion control as required to prevent the discharge or erosion of soil or fill material into
the river. Approval of this plan does not authorize any construction activity in the river.
A Town flood plain development permit will be required prior to any construction
activities in the flood plain as identified in the Chief Building Official's memo dated Jan.4.
An Army Corps of Engineers permit may also be required to accomplish utility crossings
of Black Canyon Creek."
Handicap Accessible units and access must be provided in as identified in the Chief
Building Official's memo dated Jan.4. The location of these units should be carefully
chosen to ensure accessible exterior access.
IV. COMMENTS OF REFERRAL AGENCIES (see attached correspondence)
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Continue this review to next month to allow the applicant more time to address concerns
and provide information as identified in this staff report.
TOWN of ESTES PARK
Inter -Office Memorandum
January 5, 2000
TO: Robert B. Joseph
Senior Planner, community Development
FROM: Bill Linnane
SUBJECT: Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition
Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue
The Town has no comments.
BL/lb
Memo
Date: January 7, 2000
To: Bob Joseph & Steve Stamey
From: Gregory A. White
RE: Planning Commission Submittals
Development Plan 00-03, Lot 1 Mount View Park —Sloan.
1. I have no comment.
MEMORANDUM
To: Bob Joseph, Sr. Planner
From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official
Re: Development Plan 00-03, 800 MacGregor Avenue, Black Canyon Inn
Date: January 4, 2000
Regarding Development Plan 00-03, I offer the following comments:
1. Floodplain
The proposed site plan establishes 7582 feet as the natural elevation at the west side of the
two structures and parking area proposed in the southwest corner of the property.
Firm #080193 0002 B establishes the determined base flood elevation at 7582 feet at the
property access road and 7581 feet at the southwest corner of the property.
The proposed development will border this floodplain, and some construction activity will
occur within the floodplain boundaries. Therefore, a floodplain development permit shall
be required. Application shall be made simultaneously with the relative building permit
applications. Elevation certificates shall be required. Any wetlands shall be detailed on
the proposed development plans (Municipal Zoning Code, Sections 17.28.060 & 090).
2. Zoning
Vacation of the original lot line (southwest corner) necessitates a change in zoning from
the current R-M designation (Municipal Zoning Map).
3. Setbacks
The proposed 15 feet setbacks on the north boundary constitute reduced setbacks from
the required 25 feet [Zoning Code, Sect. 17.20.040(b) (1) b].
4. Accessibility
A minimum of two (2) units shall comply with Municipal accessibility requirements ('97
UBC, Section 1103.1.9.2). Additionally, based on the extent of new development (23
existing units / 28 proposed units), existing areas open to the public shall be made
accessible. (CABO/ANSI A1117. — 1-1992.) It is the developer's responsibility to
comply with State and Federal accessibility laws, in addition to Municipal laws.
5. Fire -Resistive Construction
Accommodations having more than 3,000 square feet of floor area above the first floor
shall not be Iess than one -hour fire -resistive construction ('97 UBC, Sect. 310.2.2).
Accommodations having three or more stories in height shall require an automatic
sprinkler system ('97 UBC, Sect. 904.2.9).
E TS PAR
Est
January 5, 2000
(Volt u n
Robert B. Joseph
Senior Planner, Community Development
Town of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517
re: Development Plan 00-03, Jim Sloan
IF
11,
TMENT
0,5t7
I have reviewed the Development Plan for the above referenced property. I have
following comments with regards to fire protection:
1. ISO calculations were not provide for all new buildings
2. Emergency access and egress is adequate
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (970)577-0900.
Sincerely,
Scott Dorman, Chief
Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department
cc/ Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers
Estes Park Sanitation District
PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 80517
January 12, 2000
Mr. Bob Joseph
Senior Planner
Town of Estes Park
PO Box 1200
Estes Park, CO. 80517-1200
RE: Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition.
Dear Estes Park Planning Commission,
Upon review of the Development Plan for the above mentioned property by the board of directors
of the Estes Park Sanitation District, the directors have the following comments:
1. The development will be required to install a new sewer main through Lot 2 as per
District standards. An easement for the new main will be required on the amended
plat. The section of the main replacement that crosses over a culvert on Black Canyon
Creek will need to be insulated and installed inside ductile iron pipe. The District will
supply the insulation and the ductile iron pipe.
2. The proposed sewer line providing service to the buildings that includes the restaurant
and the proposed twelve unit building, will need to be a minimum of six inches in di-
ameter. If the developer wants to install an eight -inch line to District standards, then
the District would accept ownership of the line. An easement would also be required.
3. The proposed sewer line on the eastern portion of the plat that provides service to the
employee housing area will need to be a minimum six -inches in diameter. However,
the connection to the old service line above the District's main line is not acceptable.
This approximate 100-foot section of sewer line must be upgraded to an eight -inch line
and installed to District standards. A manhole will be required at the connection point
of the six-inch service line. The location of this extension will likely be different from
the existing service line path, so again an easement for District ownership and mainte-
nance will be required. This should also appear on the amended plat.
Office: 386 W Riverside Drive 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516
Fax: 970.586.2866
4. System Investment Fees will apply on the proposed structures. The District Manager
and Line Superintendent will be available to answer any questions that owner or Estes
Park Surveyors may have concerning these comments.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these development plans.
Sincerely,
Or V
James Duell
District Manager
Office: 386 W Riverside Drive 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516
Fax: 970.586.2866
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT
DENVER REGULATORY OFFICE, 9307 S. PLATTE CANYON ROAD
LITTLETON, COLORADO 80126-6901
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF,;
Mr. Robert B. Joseph
Town of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
170 Mac Gregor Avenue
Estes Park, Colorado 80517
January 4, 2000
RE: Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyer's Addition
Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor
Corps File No. 200080005
Dear Mr. Joseph:
Reference is made to the above mentioned project located in Section 24, Township 5 North,
Range 73 West, Larimer County, Colorado.
If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and
any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project, either temporary or permanent, in waters of
the United States which may include streams, open water lakes, ponds or wetlands at this location, this
office should be contacted by a proponent of the project for proper Department of the Army permits or
changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
If there are any questions concerning this matter, contact Mr. Terry McKee of this office at
303-979-4120 and reference Corps file No. 200080005999.
Sincerely,
Ti rhy . Carey
Chief, e er Regu?a rry Office
jb
Copies Furnished:
Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers
P.O. Box 3047
Estes Park, Colorado 80517
FROM
FAX NO,
Aug. 02 1999 11:13PM P1
ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC.
Telephone 970.580-3175
Receive FAX a1970-586-6331
December 27, 1999
W 0 2520
5UBMITA113098
Post Office Box 3047
Fsfe; Pork CO 80517
Mr. Steve Stamey, Community Development Director
Town of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517
Re Development Plan - Black Canyon Inn
ISO Calculations
Dear Mr. Stamey:
oran
to
We are in the process of discussingre rotection cteria with Stt incorporate CO
Dklemsystems and
the new structures. It is a possibility that they will
additional hydrants in a hybrid combination.
As soon as the basic premise is resolved, we will provide an appropriate ISO
calculation,
If you require additional information or have any questions. please contact us.
Respectfully yours,
Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc.
j2aJ
Paul M. Kochevar, PE & PLS 15760
President
cc: James Sloan
Sant By: O1?tCeMax Wed;
,,.„. ,,,,,,
OL-etc-r- erfiktv-opi A/1
rer'k t.. L& = CY?i 30/ 64 SP'
(' g.SiPEnlr,,44.. 061ccca//Von.G rle,, 'Cr ;jam:C-' -
Epp, P er-e. u ir•5. r
14 t r -r4er4 e_r r/eu turf i t
/:Z 1 R 4h14 P G? L,1 V r
tv e' Cup Y Q w r s.
AFYbr 1.410 oireie / S /1 r F Srcr
,A)Irei dry Gor gyp' be No f' / CV* l 3Zi 000
50)4 i Lld> f rr a "`1/0 ma systoF 7 j {, C> o d1 0.=.
� �o S�
D- r'
wx t1+1,s € 770 e.s - �B, Z
04t1 P ( 34. OP SA1 - ;= 61 6or1
Svw
.Ras. ibe't+►-s. tar4c, f. D f XEQ .6 3 7 Ooci sP
R Si r*► S e.e- ":, ri.-"4,., t r 1. f/, o a t %/16-4 (Paz
e o4aipoisft (b v..) a rt. �f Z fit=' 3 f i rf if t►fIOD `
IS- Cz, Ck16-0 zt000
ff
�Ro a' P 4.400, A, *of 7r 900 s.A $ 14 ar 3f, 00 Sg
n
-ram T-,¢ G
09 & *4 L,
FROM :
FAX NO. :
Aug. 18 1999 01:4BAM P1.
ES . INEE.RS! !Ng..
TES PARK SURyEYC�1�S & ENC .
Past Of iCe Box 3047 Ta}ephone 970 6 5175
Ethics fflc, CO 80617 FAX received at 970- B -5B15
January 12, 2000
w.O. 2520
Mr. Bois Joseph
Tc,wn of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517
Re: Black Canyon Inn
We have examined the submitted development plan and the latest revisions. Et eppears that a few
more modifications are needed. The check list attached indicates, with an asterisk the changes we
are now making and will provide first thing tomorrow.
If you have any questions or require additional Information, please contact ue-
Rey yours,
Estes Perk Surveyors & Engineers, Inc.
Paul M. Kochevar, PE. & P.L.S. No. 15760
President
= Jim Sloan
FAX NO.
Aig. 23 1999 05:06AM Pt
ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC.
Post Diriaa $nx 3047
Estes Park. CO $0517
Mr. Bob Joseph
Town of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517
Re: Black Canyon Inn - Storm Water Management
TOIsphone 97D-586s175
FAX received at 970.586.5816
January 17, 2000
WO. 2520
The enclosed report was submitted to Bill Unnasta when this project was last reviewed several years
ago. It was based upon the constructon of 4 buildings. Three of the buildings are complete.
Therefore, this report is still valid.
if you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us.
Respectfully yam,
Estes Perk Surveyors & Engineers, Inc.
Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P .. S. No. 15780
President
cc: Jim Sloan
FAX rn. :
Aug. 23 1999 05:07AM P3
FROM,
t}
H
Frl
oe
04
04
A
' aka
A�
z--
RE: Black Canyon Inn Development Plan .
Storm Drainage Management
Mr. Bill Linnaae
Town of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO. B0517
Dear Mr. Linnane:
October 25, 1994
W.O. 2520
The above mentioned development plan identifies building
envelopes, drives and parking areas for the Black Canyon Inn
property. The primary focus in the first phase of this
development will. he to construct a new access road, additional
parking for the restaurant and parking for new accommodations
units. Four new buildings will be added and seven existing
cabins will be removed in this first phase.
It is our opinion that detention ponds should not be added to
this site as it is located
adjacentftooatmajor
he oreddraint age,
i.e.
Black Canyon Creek. Delaying
int
in the basin will add to the peak volume normally experienced by
Rock Acres Townhomes located immediately to the south.
The utility and drainage plan submitted with the development
plan delineates on -site drainage patterns, both proposed and
existing. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please contact us.
Respectfully yours.
ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC.
aul M. K ehever, P.E. & P.L.S_, 15760
Per esi dent
cc: Jim Sloan
FRCltl
FAX NO. :
Aug. 23 1999 05 : 08AP1 P4
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
BLACK CANYON INN - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PREPARED FOR : JIM SLO
P.O. BOX 933
ESTES PARK, CO 80517
PREPARED BY: ESTES P SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC.
P.O_ BOX '7
ESTES PARK, CO 80517
NOVEMBER 29, 1994
FAX NO. :
Aug. 23 1999 )5:09AM P5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGE
A. SCOPE 2
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2
C. BASIN DESCRIPTION 3
D. DESIGN METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS 4
E. PEAK RUNOFF RATES 5 - 6
DETENTION POND VOLUME
OUTLET SIZING
F. RECOMMENDATIONS 7
G. SUMMARY 8
H. APPENDIX 9
I hereby certify that this report for Black Carryon Inn - Development Plan was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision for Jim Sloan; and that said report meets or
exceeds the criteria in the Latimer County Storm -Water Management Manual.
Paul M. , P.E. &. P.L.-S- No. 15760
Page 1
A. SCOPE
This report is a drainage analysis of a storm -water system to be constructed in
conjunction with the development of a funeral services business. Included herein is an
overall drainage analysis providing the following detail:
9.. Identification of overall drainage patterns in the basin-
, 2. Peak runoff rates for the historic and developed 10-year and 100-year
frequency storms at locations in and around the project site.
3. Estimate of the volume of the stonmwater that would represent the difference
in runoff between the historic and developed conditions on the project site.
The specific details of the required system are Included on the utility plan forming an
integral part of the development plan submittal
B...... ..PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The site is located along the easterly side of Devils Gulch Road about one half
mile north of the U.S. 34 By-pass intersection. More particularly, the site is a portion of
the Southeast quarter of Section 24, TSN, R72W of the t th P.M., Lorimer County,
Colorado. A full description of the property is detailed upon the accompanying
development plan.
The property will be further developed as a commercial enterprise which
provides acvomodatians services to the Estes Valley visitor. Existing cabins, the Black
Canyon Restaurant and the office/conference hall shall remain on the site. Four new
structures will be constructed with accompanying asphalt parkingrdrives and walkways
Page 2
FAX W.
Aug. 23 1999 05: 09(M P7
C. BASIN DESCRIPTION
This drainage basin is bounded on the north by the MacGregor Ranch and on
the west by Black Canyon Creek. Basin limits to the south and east ate formed by
natural ridges. For the purposes of this analysis, the basin as outlined upon the basin
map contained within the Appendix shall be representative of the entire project site, l.e.
offsite areas ere approximately equal in size and characteristics to the on -site area that
do not drain to the proposed detention pond. Storm -water flaWe from the easterly side
of the basin to the west. The lower collection point within the basin is at the existing
pond near Black Canyon Croak. This drainage condition is not being changed by the
development of this site.
Hydrologically, this ground cover on this site is characteristically; poor . It
slopes rather steeply to the west at a grade of about 12.3% . Grass ever is fair to
good although many large rock outcrops exist in the souhterly portions of the site. A
significant rainfall event would cause substantial erosion of the shallow topsoil layer.
...„Proposed development will increase surface water runoff rates and volume.
This effect will be lessened by adding landscaped areas and seeding other areas with
a maintained growth of native grasses. The specific elements of the proposed project
are shown upon the project development plan.
FAX NO. :
Aug. 23 1999 05:16AM Pi
ID. DESIGN METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
The method of analysis used for determining peak runoff rates was the Rational
Method as follows:
GZ C Cf I A where: Q = peak runoff rate in cubic feet per second
C = combined runoff coefficient
Cf = 1,25 for the 100-year storm
I = storm intensity in inches per hour
A = area in acres
Time of concentration for ov • flow was calculated using the following
equatiory T = 1.87(1.1-C 112
S1 ,3
where: C Cf = adjusted runoff coefficient
D = length of flow in feet
S = slope in percent
T time of concentration in minutes
Page 4
FAX NO. :
Aug. 23 i999 05:10AM P8
E. PEAK RUNOFF RATESI DETENTION POND VOLUME AND OUTLET SIZING
PROJECT: BLACK CANYON INN DEVELOPMENT PLAN W.O. 2520
DATE: 11-29-94 1 OF
I. BASIN CHARACTERISTICS SQ FEET ACRES
TOTAL DRAINAGE BASIN AREA 532,000 1221
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 101,890 2.33 19.1 %
ASPHALT 74220
WALKS 3,200
BUILDINGS 24,276
OPEN AREAS 430,384 9.88 80.9%
U. RUNOFF COEFFICIENT
C = RUNOFF COEFFICIENT STEEPERHISTORIC C = 0.30 3-15%, NATIVE GRASS (SOME
DEVELOPED C IS A COMBINATION OF VALUES FOR HARD SURFACE
AND OPEN SPACE AREAS AS FOLLOWS:
OPEN AREA C =. 0.30 3-15%. NATIVE GRASS (SOME STEER )
IMPERVIOUS AREA C = 0,95 ASPHALT, WALKS & BUILDINGS
COMBINATION C = 0.42
III. 'LIME OF CONCENTRATION
ATION
TIME OF CONCENTRATION = T = 1,fT(1.1-CX60.RT. D1
(CUBE ROOT OF S)
WHERE: 17 = OVERALL BASIN DISTANCE IN FEET
S = SLOPE IN PERCENT OF GRADE
C = ADJUSTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT
(APPLY A FACTOR OF 1.0 FOR 2YR, 5YR AND 10YR STORMS)
(APPLY A FACTOR OF 1.25 FOR THE 100 YR STORM)
HISTORIC DEVELOPED
STORM C 13 (FEET) S (%) TIME TIMECUBE RT(s)
2 YR 0.30 1150 12.3 22.0 2.31
2 YR 0.42 1150 12.3 18.8 2.31
2.31
10YR 0,30 1150 12.3 22.0
10 YR 0.42 1150 12.3 18.6 2.31
100 YR 0.30 1150 12.3 19.9 2.31
15.7 2.31
100 YR 0.42 1150 12.3
IV. PEAK FLAW RATES
Q = CIA
WHERE I = STORM INTENSITY A = AREA INACRES
HISTORIC
DEVELOPED
STORM C I A Q Q
2YR 0.30 1.5 12.21 5.5 2 YR
8.62YR
2 YR 0.42 1.7 12.21 10 YR
10 YR 0.30 2.5 1221 9.2 14.510 YR
10YR 0.42 2.8 12.21
t00 YR 0.38 4.2 i2.21 192 100 YR
100 YR 0.53 4.9 12.21 31.4100 YR
Page 5
FAX N0.
Aug. 23 i999 05:10AM P9
W.O. 2520
2 OF 2
V. DETENTION POND VOLUME CALCULATION
BASED UPON CITY OF ARVADA FORMULA AS FOLLOWS..
V=(Td) (Td)((Od1Td) - K"(Qh Tlt))(60)
WHERE: V = VOLUME TO BE DETAINED IN CUBIC FEET
Th = HISTORIC 71ME OF CONCENTRATION (MINUTES)
7'd = DEVELOPED T ME OF CONCENTRATION (MINUTES)
Q!! = HISTORIC RUNOFF (CUBIC FEET PER SECOND)
ad = DEVELOPED RUNOFF (CUBIC FEET PER SECOND)
K = FACTOR BASED UPON RATIO OF 7hITd AS SHOWN
ON GRAPH IN APPENDIX
Qh tad Th
5,5 8.8 22.0
92 14.5 22.0
192 31_4 19.9
V cubit feet STORM Q max
1497 2 YR 5.5
2302 10 YR 9.2
5908 100 YR 19.2
Td Th1Td K STORM
18.8 1.18 1.608 2 YR
18.6 1.18 1_08 10YR
15.7 1.27 1.662 100YR
VI. RESTRICTED OUTFLOW DESIGN
V-NOTCH WEIR SONG CALCULATION : Q = 1.25 (L.) (I-
sa
BROAD GRES't tCi WEIR CALCULATION: Q = 5-33(L - 0.2H) H
WHERE Q = HISTORIC FLOW RATE
L s TOP WIDTH OF THE WEIR (FEET)
H = DEPTH OR HEIGHT OF WEIR (FEET)
(REF: FLUID DYNAMICS BY STREETER ETAL.)
THE CHOSEN WEIR HEIGHT TO MATCH THE 100 YEAR POND DEPTH DESIGN IS:
V-NOTCH WEIR OR A
H s 9 INCHES
AM3 C>E = 192 CPS
THEN L = 294.5 INCHES
Page 6
BROAD CRESTED WEIR
H 9 INCHES
AND Q n 19.2 CPS
THEN L a 109.5 INCHES
F
FAX NO. :
Aug. 23 1999 95:16AM P2
E. RECOMMENDATIONS
The aforementioned calculations indicate the maximum desirable discharge rate
during a 100-year rainfall event of 19.2 c.f.s. The detention volume that represents the
increased flow from the historic to developed condition at this flow rate is 5908 cubic
feet. Both the peak runoff rates and detention volume calculations represent the site as
totally developed in a fashion similar to that shy on the development plan.
The existing pond located adjacent to Black Canyon Creek has been chosen for
improvement as a detention pond to serve the new site development. As the pond is
currently constructed, no additional enlargement is needed. It can store the additional
runoff volume as mentioned above without increasing it's size or depth. The selected
outlet is a broad -crested weir which varies the outfall rate as the storm -water rises
within the pond. This system will somewhat approximate the relationship between peak
runoff rates for various rainfall frequency and the detention volumes as previously
calculated herein.
The details for constructing the above mentioned pond and weir are included
with the development plan. Surface flow will be diverted to the pond by adding tvuo
culverts beneath the main drive and at some points carrying surface flow along the
drive against an asphalt curb.. The proposed drive is designed to have a cross slope of
3% which collects along the south side of the drive against the asphalt curb. Other
portions of the basin drainage shall be directed to the pond by svales and over -lot
grading.
Page 7
The weir will be constructed by embedding landscape timbers in the earthen
berm that forms the detention pond. As the outlet area is already covered with mature
grasses, no additional erosion protection downstream from the outlet is planned. The
grade downstream from the cutlet is also very gentle. This will allow the flow to spread
out in a manner similar to the existing drainage oonditian.
G SUMMARY
it is my opinion that the information contained herein represents an acceptable
approach to storm -water management in and around the previously described prolec t
site. The analysis and sizing of recommended components provides the framework for
a desirable system that can serve to better andlor maintain water quality within the
basin.
The information contained within this report represents standard and accepted
engineering practice. No other warranty is either expressed or implied.
FAX NO. : Pug. 23 1999 05:1741 P4
H. APPENDIX INDEX
Values of Runoff Coefficient, C
Rainfall intensity - Duration Curves
Detention Volume Reference
Weir Sizing Reference
Drainage Basin Map
Page 9
MOM
FAX NO. :
Aug. 23 1999 9S:1
ational Formula: Q=CIA
Q • maximum runoff rate, cubic feet per second
C ■ runoff coefficient
I m average rainfall intensity, inches per hour
A - drainage area, acres
TABLE II-7
VALUES OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENT, C
Character of Surface Runoff Coefficient, C.
Pay :., nt
Asphaltic and Concrete
Brick
Gravel' (decomposed granite, native)
.95
.95
.70
.95
Roofs
Grass - native ground cover .20
Flat, 3 percent
Average, 3 to 15 percent .25.5
Steep, 15 percent or more
Grass • 'irrigated .10
Flat, 3 percent .10
Average, 3 to 15 percent .15.
Steep, 15 percent or more
so i= RE/Ef N=
PIIOEPEOT ~STAIR
{ OR1' u611 D AJ*LGe
MAST PLAN
T01Yli OP ESTER PARK
WTMUN IPM
till uO. 0401
propmmd bp
Emma AVaK OUPPIEVORB
dam PO, wow p1• �. M
itifLLASIPZI B. OF000. W4
N flaw-.
.wr+ •
FAX NO. :
Aka. 23 1 :1
FAX MO. :
Aug. 23 1999 05:19AM P7
Emu. vp
rc
ao®
air
2.0
K I.
rs
Yo . Tis
TIME
limo tob dotdnod
d 0aestopel Runoff
rdroarwh of Historic Runoff
/*Isomr41e(C„)
o i 7 3
TV To
Formula for Approximating
Detention Volume
a at QH
1.'J , V =To(--t7 T� )(45-6-go)
,e
1.9
V = Volume tobe declined (acre to*
I = Meat* Time of Concentration (minutes)
To a . ed 'ins of Concentratton (minutes)
ON' 1H+3torEC Runoff (cubic feet per second)
Qnz peveloped Runoff (cubic feet par sacaleq
K a Factor based apart ratio TH/To as shown"
on graph
FIGURE 2.
a.lt9+1.14f:tel .s.lslon 1 CITYcf
I ASVAD.5. - ENGro!MEEP]'1G
TRIANGULAR QlETHOD TOR
DETERMINING DETENTION VOLUME
4I-6-
791
►-t• ®ll?irsge
'f.
0F. o ?TM Ei1T
FAX VEIL
AA9, 23 1999 O5:1901 P8
Chapter clufd Nie,ritr -era a.ridt Control 411
Fig. 8.36 V-notch
By expressing in terms of the angle, •Of th V-notrchl,
L
2
Hence.
8 „e—
v tan
15
lhe exponent in the equation is approximately correot, but the coefficient
must he reduced by about 41'0 per cent An approximate equation for a 9O
V-notch weir is
Q "
(8.0.28)
in which Q Is in cubic feet per second and if is in feet. Experiments show
that the coefficient is increased by roughening the upstream side of the
weir plate, which causes the '.)ounclary layer to grow thicker. The greater
amount of siow.moving liquid near the wall is more easily turned, and
hence there is less contraction of the nappe.
FAX FJ. :
Aug. 23 1999 05 : 20AM P J
DISCHARGE FROM RECTANGULAR WEIR
WITH END CONTRACTIONS
Figures in Table
are in Gallons
Per Minute
Head
(H)
In
Mein
Length (1.) of Weir In Fart
1
3
t/a
1
11h
11h
13/4
2
21/4
21A
22/4
3
4.5
12.8
23.4
35.4
49.5
64.9
81.0
98.5
117
136
157
178
314 200
31 222
33/4 245
4 269
41/4
41h
4%
5
51/•
51/i
53/4
6
61/4
63/4
7
71/4
71/z
294
318
344
370
396
422
449
477
13.4
38.2
70.2
108
150
197
248
302
361
422
485
552
624
695
769
846
925
1,006
1,091
1.175
1,262
1,352
1.442
2,535
1,632
1,742
1,826
1,928
Additional
5 such ff.
over 5 ft.
Head
(H)
Inches
22.4
63.8
117.0
180
250
330
415
506
605
706
815
926
1,047
1,167
1.292
1,424
1.359
1,696
1,835
1,985
2.130
2,282
Z440
2,600
2,760
2,920
3,094
3,260
2,029 3,435
2,130 3.609
4.5
12.8
23.4
35.1
50.4
66.2
83.5
102
122
143
165
187
211
236
261
288
316
345
374
405
434
465
495
538
560
596
630
668
702
736
73/a
8 2,338
$1h 2,442
8}f2 2.540
Length (L) of Weir in feet
8%
9
91/a
9yx
93/a
10
101/z
11
111/
12
121
13
13%
14
141/1
15
152
16
161
17
17%
18
181/:
19
191/3
3
2.238
Additional
g,p,rn.fer
$ each
f ft.
a
2.656
2.765
2,876
2,985
3,101
3,216
3,480
3,716
3,960
4,185
4,430
4,650
4.950
5,215
5.475
5,740
6,015
6,290
6,566
6,925
7,140
7,410
7,695
7.980
3,785
3,956
4,140
4,312
4,511
4.699
4,899
5,098
5,288
5.490
5,940
6.355
6,780
7,165
7.596
8,010
8.510
8,980
9,440
9,920
10.400
10,900
11.380
11.970
12,410
12,900
13,410
13,940
5,280 14.460
774
814
850
890
929
970
1,01 I
1,051
1,091
1.135
1.230
1,320
1,410
1.495
1,575
1,660
1,780
1,885
1,985
2,090
2.165
2,300
2.410
2.520
2,640
2,745
2,855
2,970
3.090
Q = 3.33 (L - 0.2H) H1-5
in which
Q cu. ft. of water flowing per second.
L = length of weir opening in feet (should be 4 to 8 times H) .
H - head on weir in feet (to be measured at least 6 ft. back of weir opening).
a - should be at least 8H.
FROM :
FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 O5:21AM P10
lb,
ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC.
Post Office Box 3047
Estes Park, CO 80517
Mr. Steve Stamey, Community Development Director
Town of Estes Park
P.O. Box 1200
Estes Park, CO 80517
Re: Development Plan - Black Canyon Inn
Statement of Intent
Dear Mr. Stamey:
Telephone 970-586-5175
Receive FAX at 970-586-6331
December 27, 1999
W.O. 2520
SUBMITAI-13098
PROJECT LOCATION
The above property is located along the east side of MacGregor Avenue, north of
Highway 34 Bypass. It is commonly known as Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of
the Meyer's Addition. The property is 14.86 acres in size and is zoned C-O Outlying
Commercial.
OWNER
The owner of this property is James Sloan. Park National Bank is the only lienholder.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This proposal has two filing aspects: 1) a development plan and 2) an amendment plat.
The development plan indicates the proposed construction of four buildings that are
about 36 feet by 60 feet in size and 2 story in height. Each of the buildings will be very
similar to the new units built over the past 4 years and each will contain 4
accommodations units. In addition, a larger structure of 12 units is proposed that is
about 70 feet by 100 feet and 3 levels in height.
In order to accommodate a growing need for employee housing, some of the existing
cabins will be relocated and then renovated for housing. the primary need is in the
summer and usually the employees are college age, sharing a vehicle or with a bicycle.
Some additional drive construction is required with associated parking. Utility lines will
be extend further to the east to serve the new units.
Page 1
December 27, 1999
W.O. 2520
Steve Stamey
SETBACK
A reduced setback is proposed along the lot line adjacent to the church. This was done
at their request as it will protect their view to Longs Peak if the new building is kept
further to the east.
AMENDED PLAT
A lot line adjustment is proposed to eliminate any conflict caused by the location of the
existing line. So far, the only problem it has caused is an additional setback for the sign
at the entry road along MacGregor Ave. It will also allow for ease in financing by having
two distinct lots.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact us.
Respectfully yours,
Estes j'ark Surveyors & Engineers, Inc.
Paul M. Kochevar, PE & PLS 15760
President
cc: James Sloan
Page 2
Lot 1, HOU%T VIEW PARK AND A PORTION OF MEYERS ADDITION to the Town
of Estes Park, Colorado, the entirety of whit: is described as
follows:
Commencing at the East Quarter corner of Section 24, Township 5
No"th, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., thence South 66.27' West a
distance of 1607.50 feet to a point on the North line at the
Stanley Addition to the Town of Estes Park; thence North a distance
of 135.00 feet to the Northeast corner of the tract described in
Book 1433 at Page 116 of the Lariaer County records end the TRUE
POINT OP BEGINNING; thence North a distance of 359.50 feet; thence
North 88'46' West a distance of 318.60 feet; thence Nc. th 63' 08'
West a distance of 60'40 feet; thence North 04'Ol' '+ast a distance
of 268.40 feat; thence South 89'01' West a distance of 254.50 feet;
`'.nce South 72631' West a distance of 144.90 feat to the Northeast
corner of the Bishop and Diocese of Colorado Props=ty; thence the
following three courses and distances along the perimeter of the
Bishop and Diocese of Colorado Property; thence South 15'52' East
a distance of 96.85 feet; thence South 31'01' West a distance of
123.85 feet; thence South 85'06' West a distance of 332.26 feet to
the Easterly right of way line of MacGregor Lane; thence South 15"
07' West a distance of„508.40 feet along the Easterly right of way
of MacGregor Lane to the Northwest corner of Rock Acres Addition
to the Town ot.Estes Park, Colorado; thence South 88'19'47" East
a distance of 102.72 feet along the North line of Rock t.cr�.
Addition to the Southeast corner of Mount View Park; thence South
88'37'35" East a distance of 461.31 feet along the North line of
Rock Acres Addition; thence North 34'22' East a distance of 224.00
feet; thence South 88.46' East a distance of 170.00 feet; thence
South 0.'14' West a distance of 187.88 feet to the North line of
the Stanley Addition; thence South 88'46' East a distance of 196.46
feet along the North line of the Stanley Addition; thence the
following two courses and distances along the perimeter of the
tract described in Book 1433 at Page 116 of the 'arimar County
Records; thence North a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 88'
46' East a distance of 232.00 feet to the TRUE POINT 0? BEGINNING.
All bearings are relative to the East line of the Southeast Quarter
of said Section 24 as bearing North 00'05, West EXCEPT portions
thereof described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner
of the Meyers Addition tr '•hr Toe', T • y,rk, wn . cu
66'27' West 1607.5 feet from t:‘ Last Quartet ..ura.r of Section 24,
Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.H., thence North 76'
33'15" West 383.8 feet to an iron pipe in concrete, thence North
31'38' 20" West 240.66 feet to an iron pipe in concrete, thence
South 59'21' West 14.90 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence
South 86'20' West 110.00 feet thence South 01'40' East 55.0 feet,
thence North 88'20' East 1i0.00 feet, thence North 01'40' West 53.0
feet to the TRUE POINT or BEGINNING. ALSO: Beginning at the
Northeast corner of the above described parcel, thence North 88'20'
East 60 feet, thence South 01'40' East 30 feet, thence South 88.20'
West 60 feet, thenca North 01'40' West 30 feet to the Point of
Beginning, County of Larimer, State of Colorado.
ESTES VALLEY
REQUEST FOR PRE -APPLICATION CONFERE
Submittal Date:
Type of Application
irg Development Plan
✓ Special Review
✓ Rezoning Petition
✓ Preliminary Subdivision Plat
✓ Final Subdivision Plat
✓ Minor Subdivision Plat
r Amended Plat
r Boundary Line Adjustment
✓ ROW or Easement Vacation
IT Street Name Change
✓ Time Extension
r Variance
r Other (please describe):
NOV' 1
9,,1 tali prp%
'o
U 14 4
'• totniumllin MUM/ AU am,inwo�m1O
General Information
Project Name
Project Description
Project Address
Legal Description
Parcel ID #
Record Owner(s)
Mailing Address
Telephone Nos.
Applicant
Amendtd. 17eve 4fimcr1 t /an, -The
Propose- 3-<Ani f' &i (di
Boo Mac &rejor' Lid6 , 4-5f-es
o�
35A - ss-Do ti
,eS at Sittek Cdnya� �
Co $ S/7
S(e2an. nn✓esfimtvtt:5, ,4
SOD Ma, Gregor Ave., Stcs
(` -70) Yo2 - ( O `1'
-Si In 5 loam..
FAX
Ark, CC SOs►7
Email
Mailing Address P3062 Mac 6rejoC Ave.
Telephone Nos. (e(7o) YqZ- (dc{e{ FAX
Email
Consultant/Engineer 4'h5irteeriitC r� Su�Yvtyr'no� r n�_
Contact Person 5 IC CG't'"Z
Mailing Address /6 g5 �tiam�`?So&4i.t� ,f��o e1514r$ �rk, co sos l?
Telephone Nos. (rk) 586-,Ysa FAX Email :Ir e-t e ces-cce.GOM1,
Site Information
Total Development Area (e.g., lot size) in acres /Y. £60 S t
Existing Land Use Matti -fa": I y1245:cicolt i roposed Land Use
Existing Water Service 1gTTownwen None Proposed Water Service
v
Existing Sewer Service ( EPSD rUTSD rSeptic Proposed Sewer Service
Existing Zoning 4-Ac omoc( riorts Proposed Zoning 4
Site Access (if not on public street)
Are there wetlands on the site?
Yes
IX Pre -Application Conference Fee
($500 for in -town properites; $800 for county properties; $0 for all variance applications)
IX Plat or Plan Copies (check with Planner for number needed)
Signature of Record Owner (s)
FOR OFFICE USE. ONLY.
Pre- pplicati
n Meeting Date:
Date %% • / '
Time:
Revised 12/17/2007
s,!o
uu
Zgaon
ct.cn.,50
IzX
05.9,2g
0.
Lt3848
cn z
17.
9
io•
Da r, la
WA
'42 r aiiii,--0,,,a0r4r1
40 N-tiglitaslI4
luf 1301480 SIET,
N minbia
!...
Z
00®<<>1 §
Yff
0 En
ko;
1
If
nso, DO
„_..
§1§§§2"0'....
9Effir66666 (1/0
vft
(S 0 0" ( 268.40'
0,01
\_
•
logy
-
•••• Z -�
nnmmnnt t
i
%--siTa/1 .uu/6-6s Nr --
HJNna 21093a9 39.
a
Z —••441.1
1U
r
N
N
N
a
N
N
38113 1SNa'311+1j
aY113A't2bltll
tI
a3
1WMStl 30 3903
02+0 tlls
1lVNdStl JO 391S
. ... __
\
\
— ...
96ab 3
IX
3NIl Stl9 9NIVIC
£S+0 tl1S
H
/
S5+b tll�,
-366LE RESTRAINED 2' D.IP,
I
1111aN113
3NpIM3131 aNqq
IN VI
a311n1SNp
•
lM
9a1 tl199
IJIa1J333 a3lltllSN:
21 3NOHa3131 s7
OL+1 tl19
a.
a`
11VH+I 39a
0+
b0aZ V
HCRZ. SCALE 1'=20'
VERT. SCALE VAS' ',,
\`
a
A
\
118811V.ei +c bls
331n313S a3n39
NtlS .1. 0311V1SN
aat V1J
TI11AStl 31 3917
LC'C91S
3J1Aa3S a31S1tl
.6/f U3'I1tlN
91
3Ina3Ta31
t
tlH�dSp OY3tl
3F9•C
tl
NOI1JIkLL1.83 .2
iaNJ /N 3JIAa3S .Z
3a13'TN1SN
aN1S
laH3SStl 11rJaUA11
99+L VIS
O
r
N
r
O
r
N
r
O
r
m 8([
f
oq
Eaal
—,00'6 —
Cl)
920E
022E
C)
BUILDINGS C
BUILDING B - UPPER LEVEL
L0 2E —__-
F. Fy
VO fa
Cr M h M
�Cti� <
N OEM
CE :J �
920E
BUILDINGS C
,002E
920E
,920E
,000—
E
Ea
0'b
,02E
J
BUILDING A
BUILDING A - LOWER LEVEL
0
_...:aa:S!ZA a:!..