Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDOCUMENTS Black Canyon Inn DP 00-03Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner II and Bob Joseph, Director Date: March 7, 2003 Subject: Request for Extension of Vested Rights for Development Plan 00- 03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition Background. The applicant, Jim Sloan, has requested an extension of the three year vested rights period for Development Plan #00-03A. February 6, 2003 and February 15, 2003 letters from the applicant requesting this extension are attached. The February 15th letter requested a two year time extension and stated that it is Town policy to limit the exension to one year. This is not a Town policy and the Town Board can approve a two year vested rights extension. The Estes Park Planning Commission approved Development Plan #00-03A on March 21, 2000 and vesting expires on March 21, 2003. The plan was reviewed and approved as compliant with the prior zoning code. Approval of a vested rights time extension will allow the applicant to build as shown on development plan #00-03A, i.e. the development plan will not be revised to comply with current Estes Valley Development Code standards. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and property owners within 100 feet of the property for consideration and comment. Letters were received from the Estes Park Sanitation District, Town Light and Power Department, and Town Attorney. The Sanitation District has no concerns about the request. The Light and Power Department and Town Attorney have no comment. A neighbor expressed concern about the proximity of the proposed development to MacGregor Ranch to the north and east. The N Location Map for 800 MacGregor Avenue A0 425 850 1,700 2,550 3,4Teet setback to this property under the prior zoning code twenty-five feet; however, the applicant received a variance to build fifteen feet from the property line. If this extension is not granted, development must comply with the Estes Valley Development Code twenty five foot setback, unless another variance is granted. If this plan was reviewed for compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code plan revisions may be necessary, including revisions to comply with current building/yard, wetlands and stream setbacks, current parking lot design standards and to limit disturbance to rock outcroppings. It is verly likely that the proposed development plan would comply with current density requirements; however, staff does not have enough information to provide an accurate density calculation. Town Board approval of a vested rights extension requires a Town Board finding that economic conditions and project complexity necessitate a longer vested rights period than the three year period required by state law. Budget. None. 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 Website: ces-ccc.com 9/28/06 Bob Joseph Community Development Director The Town of Estes Park Bob, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. will be making some improvements to the Black Canyon Inn project that will make the project safer and more compliant with the EVDC. The area indicated on the latest site plan as "proposed unpaved parking" will now be paved and concrete wheel stops will be installed. Also, a crane will be removing the boulders located closest to the edge of the cut bank to the East. The crane is scheduled for next Wednesday, October 3. Please visit the site after that date and see if you are still concerned with the condition of the bank. Thank you, Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying Inc. Ben Greer, Project Manager CORNE ENGINEERING & STONE 9/13/06 SURVEYING. INC Bob Joseph Community Development Director The Town of Estes Park Bob, 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 Website: ces-ccc.com Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc has been hired by Jim Sloan of the Black Canyon Inn to perform both engineering services and as a General Contractor. The original site plans for the project were composed by the architect, Kenney and Associates. As the original site plan contained several inaccuracies and did not reflect the desires of the owner, we revised the site plan. Enclosed is the latest site plan for your use. CES requests that the current permit for the 10 unit lodge (building F) be allowed to conform to this latest site plan. We realize some of the work performed at the site deviated slightly from the original site plan. Areas where cut materials were stockpiled shall be reshaped and revegitated. In addition, CES is in the process of preparing a new development plan that will comply with the current Estes Valley Development Code. CES will submit this plan to your department for approval before any more permits are applied for. Your patience and understanding are appreciated. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying Inc. Ben Greer, Project Manager ferry "rochaska, Principal Community Development Town of Estes Park May 30, 2006 Jim Sloan Black Canyon Inn 800 MacGregor Ave. Estes Park, Co. 80517 Dear Mr. Sloan: P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Co. 80517 File : (3ui1I:AS r`-'^`;PlarN F; l e.4eao-C13 I have recently reviewed your revised site plans, and visited the site. First, I want to acknowledge that the site plan revisions produced by Cornerstone look to be an improvement over the old plan and they may also be found to be code compliant once they are reviewed through the required process. However, I am concerned on two main points: 1) Recent site work has departed from the plan approved in 2000 to a degree that staff is no longer able to process these changes as minor revisions to the old plan. 2) The recent placement of fill material in several locations on the site in preparation for new parking and building sites has not been properly authorized and permitted. The current building permit does not extend beyond scope of work actually shown on the plans submitted with that permit. Having looked at the fill already in place for new parking areas it is evident that we need to update your old approval, that is to say you need to prepare a master plan for the whole property that accurately reflects current existing conditions (newly placed fill) and your most current planning for new improvements. At this point we have no choice but to review that plan under the new code (EVDC). Please begin preparation of this development plan update in conformance with the submittal requirements found in the Estes Valley Development Code. You must submit a complete revised set to this office no later than July 14th 2006. In the event you fail to make this submittal date you will be required to remove all unauthorized fill and return the site to original grade and vegetation. Please discontinue all general grading and paving work and retaining wall construction, except as shown on building permits issued, until a revised development plan is approved. Also please submit a height elevation certificate by Friday, June 2, 2006. Site work on underground utilities consistent with building permits issued may continue. I also recommend you make an appointment to meet with our planning staff and your engineer as soon as possible to review the details of our current code requirements as they apply to your property. Sincerely, Bob Joseph, LA, AICP Director Cc: Cornerstone Engineering )/14/ Inc. March 15, 2005 Mr. Bob Joseph Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park CO 80517 Re: Proposed Accommodation Zoning Restrictions Ladies and Gentlemen: ... an intimate mountain resort Pursuant to my letter of March 4, will provide more information pertinent to my particular situation and the continued development of the Black Canyon Inn property at 800 MacGregor Avenue. I purchased the property in November of 1992. Although it had been a resort property since the late 60's, it had been utilized as "low income housing" for the year and a half preceding my acquisition. 1 reopened the cabins and restaurant in 1993 and began planning for the replacement of the outdated Stead's Ranch era cabins that had been moved to the property. Beginning in 1995, substantial utility upgrades( approx. $300,000 in water, sewer, gas, electric, cable and telephone) have been completed as a prelude to the overall development of the 14 acre parcel. Some of these projects are of direct benefit to the town as a whole as they were components of your water, system upgrade that will continue for many more years. The first buildings were designed and completed in 1995. Each unit was designed so that it could be converted in the future if necessitated by financial or other causes. The second phase, 4 additional buildings, was begun in 2000. As you know, you approve development plans for a three-year term. From 95 through 00, we had enjoyed steady growth in business levels. In early 2001, the nation's economic decline had an effect on our summer bookings and the disaster in NY sealed 2001 as a less than ideal business year. For that reason, I postponed the construction of the next lodge building. The following 3 years continued with lackluster growth in our market (as well as the additional inventory available to tourists in the area), and school calendars around the country have compressed our family market (still the mainstay of our summer season) into a 6 or 7 week peak period. I have been hard pressed to justify expanding my inventory. After exhausting every personal means of mitigating this economic reality while remaining confident in the appeal of Estes Park to tourists, I began the conversion process for the units in order to provide the funding mechanism to be able to fulfill my development plan and to move on to addressing the final phase of developing the property. I appreciate that the town did allow me an extension of the plan, which is currently proceeding. Colorado Statute also applies time constraints regarding 800 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com E-mail: info@blackcanyoninn.com Phone: (970) 586 8113 Fax: (970) 586 5123 condominiums, which will force me to have completed the final phase of development within the next six years. As a 34 year resident of the community, I have worked hard to shepherd the properties with which I have been involved. I believe that I have made tasteful choices that lend to a harmonious land use and been judicious with density planning in order to preserve the character of this magnificent piece of property. As I have invested everything that I have in this project, I ask that, should you pass this measure, the balance of the project would be exempted from the new restrictions. The condo declarations allow for a maximum of 77 units. With the completion of the present phase, I will focus on a plan for the "upper" portion of the property. As you are aware, it has a residential nature because of the adjacent condo and single family uses presently there. I remain eager to discuss this with you and to come to an understanding for the mutual benefit of both visitors and residents of the Black Canyon Inn. Sincerely, Jn'S'`. an 'Cc: John Baudek Sue Ioylen David Habecker Lori Jeffrey -Clark Chuck Levine Wayne Newsom Bill Pinkham Black Canyon Development Plan #00-03A 3/6/03 # of Units Per Building Unit#5 1 Building A 4 Building B 4 Building C 4 Building D 4 Building E 4 Building F 12 Building H 4 Building G 4 Relocated Units X 4 Existing to Remain 3 Restaurant l t2s ► l ry orr" 3v,-„fS Conference Center hl-units 32 2 a TOWN OF ESTES PARK i Jim Sloan Black Canyon Inn, Inc. 800 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 856 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: The Lodges at Black Canyon Inn Condominiums Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue Dear Mr. Sloan: Vested rights for Development Plan #00-03A for the above referenced property expire on March 21, 2005. Permit #M-007-05 (formerly #M-006-05) has been issued for demolition of cabins. Provided a building permit is submitted for construction prior to March 21, 2005, vested rights will not expire on that date. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me (577-3720) at your convenience. Sincerely, 4ANrIcvaafro Alison Chilcott, AICP Planner II http://www.estesnet.com (970) 586-5331 • P.O. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816 --,a/nycott )/1111 Inc - February 7, 2005 Ms. Alison Chilcott Community Development Dept. Town of Estes Park Estes Park CO 80517 Allison, ... an intimate mountain resort Currently, we are executing Permit # M-006-65 for the demolition of the cabins to make way for the next of the buildings on our development plan. Due to a delay in the architect delivering the plans and final engineering for;. submittal to the building department, we may not have the footings in place by the expiration of the current approval period next month. I am requesting an extension of one year to allow the work to continue as approved. For your information, I have engaged Cornerstone Engineering to oversee this phase of the plan and continue to use Kenney & Associates Architects. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, 41,,_ 1, Sloan ack Canyon Inn, Inc loan Investments, Inc. 800 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com E-mail: info@blackcanyoninn.com Phone: (970) 586 8113 Fax: (970) 586 5123 TOWN OF ESTES PARK P. O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX Date: 1/13/2004 Number of pages including cover sheet 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT To: Don Claassen Lot 23, Black Canyon Hills Phone #: 586-1885 Fax #: 586-1885 cc: From: Alison Chilcott, Planner II Phone #: (970) 577-3720 Fax #: (970) 586-0249 e-mail: achilcott@estes.org REMARKS: 0 Urgent 0 For your review 0 Reply ASAP 0 Please comment Re: Black Canyon Development Plan Attached is the portion of the Development Plan for Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition #00-03 showing the area closest to your lot, Lot 23, Black Canyon Hills. This plan was approved on March 21, 2000. The three year vesting period expired on March 21, 2003 and was extended for an additional two years by Town Board. If a building permit is not pulled by March 21, 2005 and Town Board does not grant another extension of the vesting, resubmittal of a development plan will be required prior to build additional units, unless less than three additional units are proposed on the lot. The approved development plan was reviewed for compliance with the old zoning code. A new development plan would be reviewed for compliance with Estes Valley Development Code which became effective on February 1, 2000. Compliance with this Code may result in the need for a different site plan/building layout. The twenty-five foot minimum building setback from your property line would remain the same. Additional parking lot screening may be required for a parking lot with six or more spaces. I've also included a letter to Jim Sloan notifying him of the extension. HP Fax Series 900 Plain Paper Fax/Copier Fax History Report for Town of Estes Park 970-586-0249 Jan 13 2004 4:42pm Last Fax Date Time Type Jdentification ,Duration Pages Result Jan 13 4:39pm Sent 5861885 1:07 3 OK Result: OK - black and white fax TOWN OF ESTES PARK April 4, 2003 Jim Sloan Black Canyon Inn 800 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 856 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition #00-03A Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue Dear Mr. Sloan: The Estes Park Town Board reviewed the vested rights extension request for Development Plan #00-03A for Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition on Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at the regular monthly meeting. At that time, the Town Board voted to recommend APPROVAL of a two year extension of the vested rights period. The Estes Park Planning Commission approved Development Plan #00-03A on March 21, 2000. The three year vesting period which would have expired on March 21, 2003 has been extended for two years. Vesting will expire on March 21, 2005. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me (577-3720) at your convenience. Sincerely, Alison Chilcott, AICP Planner II cc: Paul Kochevar, Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers, Inc. http://www.estesnet.com (970) 586-5331 • P.O. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816 Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk From: Alison Chilcott, Planner II sC Date: April 7, 2003 Subject: Two Year Vested Rights Extension for Development Plan 00-03A for Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition Jim Sloan requested a vested rights extension for Development Plan #00-03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition which expired on March 21, 2003. The Town Board minutes state that a vested rights extension was granted for Development Plan #00-03 rather than #00-03A. Please let me know if this should be corrected in the minutes or if a memo to the file is sufficient. North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street Loveland, Colorado 80538 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law February 26, 2003 ALISON CHILCOTT, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ES 1'ES PARK, CO 80517 970/667-5310 Fax 970/667-2527 Re: Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums — 800 MacGregor Avenue Dear Ms. Chiicott: I have no comment. If you have any questions, pleas: do not hesitate to give me a call. trul yours, A. White GAW/ldr Cc: Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers Fax: 970/586-5816 Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 80517 February 25, 2003 Alison Chilcott, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517-1200 RE: Time extension on development plan Lot 1, Mount View Park (Jim Sloan) Dear Alison Chilcott, Upon review of the time extension request for the above mentioned property, the Estes Park Sanitation District has the following comment: 1. The District has no problem with the time extension request for his development plan at 800 MacGregor Avenue. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this review. Sincerely, James Duell District Manager Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 gig Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter -Office Memorandum January 21, 2003 TO: Alison Chiicott Planner FROM: Todd Steichen Acting Line Su tendent, Light and Power Department SUBJECT: The Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition 800 MacGregor Avenue The Light and Power Department has no comments. TS/lb Jim Sloan Black Canyon Inn 800 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 856 Estes Park, CO 80517 TOWN OF ESTES PARK February 14, 2003 Re: Development Plan Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyers Addition #00-03 and #00-03A Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue Dear Mr. Sloan: f As noted in your February 6, 2003 letter to Bob Joseph, the current development plan, Dons. originally approved on March 21, 2000, will expire on March 21, 2003. The Estes Park z _ i 8-om Town Board will review your request for an extension of the vesting period at the 7:00 p.m., Tuesday March 11, 2003 meeting, provided you submit a revised letter stating the requested extension period, e.g. one additional year, and nine copies of the amended development plan by 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 18, 2003 and. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me (577-3720) at your convenience. Sincerely, Alison Chilcott, AICP Planner II cc: Paul Kochevar, Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers, Inc. http://www.estesnet.com (970) 586-5331 • P.O. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816 TOWN OF ESTES PARK P. O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX Date: 2/12/03 Number of pages including cover sheet: 7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT To: Greg White Phone #: 667-5310 Fax #: 667-2527 CC: From: Alison Chilcott Phone #: (970) 577-3720 Fax #: (970) 586-0249 e-mail: achilcott@estes.org REMARKS: 0 Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP 0 Please comment RE: Black Canyon and Lots 2&3 Rock Acres Subdivision Black Canyon. I'm assuming this attached request for a vesting extension needs to published and go to Town Board next month with a staff report. Though I don't see a reason to recommend approval. Lots 2&3 Rock Acres subdivision. Once you've reviewed the attached letter, I'd like to talk to ou about a couple issues. 2- / y C&.Yv. OCn ( 1. 2- i 4 ". ASll1;sz-f ce-K-c (g_ pC Qv. C.e Revised: 12/99 2 OO m y i)'r S 7 c-47 1.) ;1 / rev 4414/011. )/14/ Inc. February 15, 2003 Mr. Bob Joseph Community Development Dept. Town of Estes Park Estes Park CO 80517 Bob, ... an intimate mountain resort Alison requested a more specific request relating, to my February 6 letter regarding an extension on my current development plan. I would appreciate a two year extension to be considered, however, it is my understanding that your policy allows for one year only. If that is the case, I will make every effort to work within the one year allowance if that is possible. I would consider some minor building modifications to the plans I have prepared, if it would address any changes in code that might have occurred. Paul and I would be happy to meet before the commission meeting to address any issues you may have. Sirerely, . ini Sloan Black Canyon Inn 970-586-8113 cc: Paul Kochevar, EP Surveyors 800 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com Phone: (970) 586 8113 E-mail: infoCOlackcanyoninn.com Fax: (970) 586 5123 ... an intimate mountain resort 2/14/ Inc. February 6, 2003 Mr. Bob Joseph Community Development Director Town of Estes Park Estes Park CO 80517 Bob, As you are aware, my current development plan will expire on March 21 of this year. Due to the poor economic performance of the resort over the past two years, I have been unable to proceed with the proposed construction. Is there an opportunity for an extension period to be considered on all or any parts of the plan. I have invested considerable time and resources into the plan and am constantly pressing to continue with it. My attention has been focused and architectural work completed on the 13- suite lodge at the northwest corner of the resort. I would be especially interested in a continuance on at least' that portion of the project. I am available at any time to meet if you have comments on this possibility. Paul Kochevar will be able to meet with us if we can schedule a time. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Sincerely, Ji Sloan Black Canyon Inn 70-586-8113 800 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Internet: www.blackcanyoninn.com E-mail: info@blackcanyoninn.com Phone: (970) 586 8113 Fax: (970) 586 5123 TO: All Affected Agencies FROM: Alison Chilcott Planner SUBJECT: The Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition 800 MacGregor Avenue February 20, 2003 Enclosed please find letters from Jim Sloan requesting a time extension for Development Plan 00-03 for the above referenced property. This request was submitted by James Sloan and will be considered by the Town Board of Trustees on Tuesday, March 11, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Please submit any comments you may have regarding this request as soon as possible, but no later than March 3, 2003. You are always welcome to attend this meeting. NOTE: Please send (or fax) a copy of your comments to the applicant or his/her agent at the address or fax number shown below: Enclosures Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers P.O. Box 3047 Estes Park, CO 80517 Fax: 970-586-5816 GIPAEc DR AVIF..INUE ES PARK, CO 80.5 7 '* FAX (970) 586..2816 February 20, 2003 TO: Adjacent Property Owner FROM: Alison Chilcott Planner RE: The Lodge at Black Canyon Hills Condominiums Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition 800 MacGregor Avenue Applicant: James Sloan Enclosed for your information are copies of letters from Jim Sloan requesting a time extension for Development Plan 00-03 for the above referenced property which is adjacent to yours. This item will be considered by the Town Board of Trustees on March 11, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Municipal Building. You are welcome to attend this meeting. Should you have any questions, desire additional information, or would like to comment on the proposed request, please contact me at the address or telephone number listed below. Enclosures 9.1 111:1, net corn IBO.X 1 70 MAC i,.YlRII:::C a- R AVENUE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 * FAX d,°- Community Development Town of Estes Park January 2, 2001 Mr. Paul Kochevar Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers Re: Black Canyon Development Plan Dear Paul: P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Co. 80517 There are several conditions with this approval that I would like to ask you to address prior to accepting the final mylar. These are items 1, 2, and 4 on the attached minutes. Sincerely, Bob Joseph Senior Planner ••*Oro•• n!•U•MINO CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission — March 21, 2000 Page 3 Estes Park Surveyors, representing the applicant, reviewed his memo dated March 21, 2000, and answered questions from Commissioners. Drainage easements will be determined prior to time of building permit. Commissioner Pohl requested a corrected time/date notation of EPS fax machine. There was no public comment. It was moved and seconded (Burgess/Clark) to approve Development Plan 00-04, Lot 4, Beaver Point 3rd Addition with the following conditions. Motion passed. Those voting yes: Pohl, Burgess, Sager, Clark. Those voting no: Thomas, Hix. 1. Prior to issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy on this site, all required planting improvements shall be installed or guaranteed. 2. The proposed contours for relocation of existing drainage easement and natural drainage swale shall be added to the plan. 3. Vacation of the existing drainage easement as originally platted, and dedication of a new, recorded easement shall be accomplished prior to issuance of a building permit on this site. 4. The plan shall provide 100 new shrubs, or alternatively, thirty new trees (total) in addition to previous landscape requirements. 5. Requirements made by Public Works Director in his memo dated February 9, 2000, shall be met. 6. A vicinity map shall be added to the plan. 7. A new Improvement Guarantee shall be submitted and approved by staff. b. Development Plan 00-03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition, Black Canyon Inn, James Sloan/Applicant. Paul Kochevar reviewed the proposal. It was determined that it was inappropriate to split the lot. Staff noted that combustible materials could not be used in the walkway within the setbacks to comply with the building code. A note will be added that the UBC as well as the ADA requirements for accessibility will be met. At least one handicapped parking space will be added to each area (restaurant, conference center, accommodation units). Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the Staff recommendations. The location of the sewer line in the southwest corner is dependent upon the possible future development in that area; therefore, the final engineering will be postponed until future development is determined. There was no public comment. It was moved and seconded (Thomas/Pohl) to approve Development Plan 00-03A, Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. All EPSD requirements shall be met. All proposed new utility lines shall be shown on the plan, and easements provided as required. Design plan and profile for new sewer lines and their associated easements should be reviewed and accepted by EPSD prior to approval. Dedication of required new utility easements and abandonment of old easements shall be recorded with Larimer 1.11A9roNOIUCU WINO CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission — March 21, 2000 Page 4 county, prior to requesting building permits for the units next to Black Canyon Creek. 2. The plan shall identify locations for future expansion of the parking to a total of 140 spaces, so that the parking demand can be met in the future if in fact the proposed 108 spaces prove not to be adequate. The applicant shall fumish a detailed parking analysis on a separate written form demonstrating that adequate parking is provided. 3. All buildings shall be given a unique label or designation on the plan. Floating building labels that appear in error shall be removed. 4. Handicap Accessible units and access must be provided as identified in the Chief Building Official's memo dated January 4, 2000, to include deletion of the note regarding the 1 to 100 ratio. The plan shall show all required handicapped parking spaces, approved by the Town Building Official. 5. A Floodplain Development Permit is required prior to construction of units in the southwest comer as noted in the Chief Building Official's memo dated January 4, 2000. There being no further business, Chair Sager made closing remarks regarding this last meeting of the Estes Park Planning Commission and adjourned the meeting at 3:08 p.m. Al Sager, Chair Meribeth Wheatley, Recording Secretary FRE1i1 : FAX NO. : Aug. 19 1999 10:25PM P1 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FROM: ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Peet Office (tax 3847 Telephone 970-586-5175 Estes Park, CO 80517 PAX received at 970.686-5814 JANUARY 14, 2000 FAX NO. 970-58S-024s TO; BOB JOSEPH AT TOWN OF ESTES PARK No. of sheets including cover sheet a....., Re: Tiny Town Cottages & Black Canyon Inn & Beaver Point Third Jim Sloan needs to proceed with the construction of the building next to the church if at all possible or he will not have time to get it built before the season peaks. Would you consider a development plan revision that only finalized the aspects directly associated with this building. All the utility lines are in place at this particular site and the parking just needs restructuring and asphalt We could even prepare a drawing that only indicates this building as it is on the computer and it is simple to start erasing all the other new parts. We would also hold off on the amended plat until the development plan can accompany it's review - We did not receive any of the comments for any of the projects from Linnane, EPSD or ? Greg dirt send his directly to us. We will proceed with the amended plat for Tiny Town Cottages this next week. Could we meet next week to review another layout of lots? We will proceed with a development plan for Jack Williams project. This would be for the lot in the middle of his project. Could we meet next week to review a layout of these units? If you need additional information or have any questions, please contact us. Paul Kochevar cc: Jim Sloan Date: 1-12-00 Title: Black Canyon Inn Development Plan 00-03, Lot 1 and 2 Mount View Park/Meyers Location: MacGregor Ave. North of the Bypass Applicant: Jim Sloan I. SITE DATA Engineer: EP Surveyors and Engineers Number of lots: One existing, Two proposed Size of lots: 1.9 acres and 12.9 acres Existing Zoning: CO -Commercial Outlying Existing Land Use: Commercial Accommodations and Restaurant Water: Town Sewer: EPSD Access: MacGregor Ave. IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION This is a proposal to add two four-plex buildings, one twelve-plex building, and one tri- plex building to Lot 1. Also, to build two four-plex buildings on the newly created Lot 2. The total accommodations units on Lot 1 would be 52. The total units on Lot 2 would be 8. The new construction would involve relocation of existing cabins to be used as employee housing as indicated on the plan. III. PROJECT REVIEW The applicant should furnish a detailed density calculation for both lots that includes identification of all units with kitchens noted (dwelling units) or motel units noted, if any. The units should be clearly labeled on the plan sheet as either dwelling units or motel units. It does appear that both lots have adequate land area to support the proposed density. A variance has been granted to reduce the building setback for the four-plex next to the church. drainage: Drainage will flow to Black Canyon Creek without detention. The site grading plan for construction of new parking lots and drives should be carefully prepared to ensure proper handling of surface run-off. parking: The applicant should furnish a detailed parking analysis demonstrating that adequate parking is provided. Any shared parking or reduced employee parking assumptions should be specifically identified. It appears that parking as shown may be adequate if shared parking is assumed between the units, restaurant, and employee housing. surfacing: All parking and drives should be asphalt, and this should be noted on the plan. fire: ISO calculations have been provided on the revised plan. The Fire Chief should have an opportunity to review and comment on the revised plan. It is expected that the proposed new hydrants will be adequate. These should be clearly labeled. utilities: (see correspondence) The EPSD has identified several requirements in their review of this proposal. All EPSD requirements should be met. All proposed new utility lines should be shown on the plan, and easements provided as required. Design plan and profile for new sewer lines and their associated easements should be reviewed and accepted by EPSD prior to approval. other: Wetlands should be mapped and identified on the Development Plan. A note should be added to the plan stating: "The Developer shall be responsible for erosion control as required to prevent the discharge or erosion of soil or fill material into the river. Approval of this plan does not authorize any construction activity in the river. A Town flood plain development permit will be required prior to any construction activities in the flood plain as identified in the Chief Building Official's memo dated Jan.4. An Army Corps of Engineers permit may also be required to accomplish utility crossings of Black Canyon Creek." Handicap Accessible units and access must be provided in as identified in the Chief Building Official's memo dated Jan.4. The location of these units should be carefully chosen to ensure accessible exterior access. IV. COMMENTS OF REFERRAL AGENCIES (see attached correspondence) V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Continue this review to next month to allow the applicant more time to address concerns and provide information as identified in this staff report. TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter -Office Memorandum January 5, 2000 TO: Robert B. Joseph Senior Planner, community Development FROM: Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Avenue The Town has no comments. BL/lb Memo Date: January 7, 2000 To: Bob Joseph & Steve Stamey From: Gregory A. White RE: Planning Commission Submittals Development Plan 00-03, Lot 1 Mount View Park —Sloan. 1. I have no comment. MEMORANDUM To: Bob Joseph, Sr. Planner From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official Re: Development Plan 00-03, 800 MacGregor Avenue, Black Canyon Inn Date: January 4, 2000 Regarding Development Plan 00-03, I offer the following comments: 1. Floodplain The proposed site plan establishes 7582 feet as the natural elevation at the west side of the two structures and parking area proposed in the southwest corner of the property. Firm #080193 0002 B establishes the determined base flood elevation at 7582 feet at the property access road and 7581 feet at the southwest corner of the property. The proposed development will border this floodplain, and some construction activity will occur within the floodplain boundaries. Therefore, a floodplain development permit shall be required. Application shall be made simultaneously with the relative building permit applications. Elevation certificates shall be required. Any wetlands shall be detailed on the proposed development plans (Municipal Zoning Code, Sections 17.28.060 & 090). 2. Zoning Vacation of the original lot line (southwest corner) necessitates a change in zoning from the current R-M designation (Municipal Zoning Map). 3. Setbacks The proposed 15 feet setbacks on the north boundary constitute reduced setbacks from the required 25 feet [Zoning Code, Sect. 17.20.040(b) (1) b]. 4. Accessibility A minimum of two (2) units shall comply with Municipal accessibility requirements ('97 UBC, Section 1103.1.9.2). Additionally, based on the extent of new development (23 existing units / 28 proposed units), existing areas open to the public shall be made accessible. (CABO/ANSI A1117. — 1-1992.) It is the developer's responsibility to comply with State and Federal accessibility laws, in addition to Municipal laws. 5. Fire -Resistive Construction Accommodations having more than 3,000 square feet of floor area above the first floor shall not be Iess than one -hour fire -resistive construction ('97 UBC, Sect. 310.2.2). Accommodations having three or more stories in height shall require an automatic sprinkler system ('97 UBC, Sect. 904.2.9). E TS PAR Est January 5, 2000 (Volt u n Robert B. Joseph Senior Planner, Community Development Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 re: Development Plan 00-03, Jim Sloan IF 11, TMENT 0,5t7 I have reviewed the Development Plan for the above referenced property. I have following comments with regards to fire protection: 1. ISO calculations were not provide for all new buildings 2. Emergency access and egress is adequate If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (970)577-0900. Sincerely, Scott Dorman, Chief Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department cc/ Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 80517 January 12, 2000 Mr. Bob Joseph Senior Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO. 80517-1200 RE: Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of Meyer's Addition. Dear Estes Park Planning Commission, Upon review of the Development Plan for the above mentioned property by the board of directors of the Estes Park Sanitation District, the directors have the following comments: 1. The development will be required to install a new sewer main through Lot 2 as per District standards. An easement for the new main will be required on the amended plat. The section of the main replacement that crosses over a culvert on Black Canyon Creek will need to be insulated and installed inside ductile iron pipe. The District will supply the insulation and the ductile iron pipe. 2. The proposed sewer line providing service to the buildings that includes the restaurant and the proposed twelve unit building, will need to be a minimum of six inches in di- ameter. If the developer wants to install an eight -inch line to District standards, then the District would accept ownership of the line. An easement would also be required. 3. The proposed sewer line on the eastern portion of the plat that provides service to the employee housing area will need to be a minimum six -inches in diameter. However, the connection to the old service line above the District's main line is not acceptable. This approximate 100-foot section of sewer line must be upgraded to an eight -inch line and installed to District standards. A manhole will be required at the connection point of the six-inch service line. The location of this extension will likely be different from the existing service line path, so again an easement for District ownership and mainte- nance will be required. This should also appear on the amended plat. Office: 386 W Riverside Drive 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.2866 4. System Investment Fees will apply on the proposed structures. The District Manager and Line Superintendent will be available to answer any questions that owner or Estes Park Surveyors may have concerning these comments. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these development plans. Sincerely, Or V James Duell District Manager Office: 386 W Riverside Drive 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.2866 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT DENVER REGULATORY OFFICE, 9307 S. PLATTE CANYON ROAD LITTLETON, COLORADO 80126-6901 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF,; Mr. Robert B. Joseph Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 170 Mac Gregor Avenue Estes Park, Colorado 80517 January 4, 2000 RE: Lot 1, Mount View Park and a Portion of Meyer's Addition Black Canyon Inn, 800 MacGregor Corps File No. 200080005 Dear Mr. Joseph: Reference is made to the above mentioned project located in Section 24, Township 5 North, Range 73 West, Larimer County, Colorado. If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project, either temporary or permanent, in waters of the United States which may include streams, open water lakes, ponds or wetlands at this location, this office should be contacted by a proponent of the project for proper Department of the Army permits or changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. If there are any questions concerning this matter, contact Mr. Terry McKee of this office at 303-979-4120 and reference Corps file No. 200080005999. Sincerely, Ti rhy . Carey Chief, e er Regu?a rry Office jb Copies Furnished: Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers P.O. Box 3047 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 FROM FAX NO, Aug. 02 1999 11:13PM P1 ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Telephone 970.580-3175 Receive FAX a1970-586-6331 December 27, 1999 W 0 2520 5UBMITA113098 Post Office Box 3047 Fsfe; Pork CO 80517 Mr. Steve Stamey, Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re Development Plan - Black Canyon Inn ISO Calculations Dear Mr. Stamey: oran to We are in the process of discussingre rotection cteria with Stt incorporate CO Dklemsystems and the new structures. It is a possibility that they will additional hydrants in a hybrid combination. As soon as the basic premise is resolved, we will provide an appropriate ISO calculation, If you require additional information or have any questions. please contact us. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. j2aJ Paul M. Kochevar, PE & PLS 15760 President cc: James Sloan Sant By: O1?tCeMax Wed; ,,.„. ,,,,,, OL-etc-r- erfiktv-opi A/1 rer'k t.. L& = CY?i 30/ 64 SP' (' g.SiPEnlr,,44.. 061ccca//Von.G rle,, 'Cr ;jam:C-' - Epp, P er-e. u ir•5. r 14 t r -r4er4 e_r r/eu turf i t /:Z 1 R 4h14 P G? L,1 V r tv e' Cup Y Q w r s. AFYbr 1.410 oireie / S /1 r F Srcr ,A)Irei dry Gor gyp' be No f' / CV* l 3Zi 000 50)4 i Lld> f rr a "`1/0 ma systoF 7 j {, C> o d1 0.=. � �o S� D- r' wx t1+1,s € 770 e.s - �B, Z 04t1 P ( 34. OP SA1 - ;= 61 6or1 Svw .Ras. ibe't+►-s. tar4c, f. D f XEQ .6 3 7 Ooci sP R Si r*► S e.e- ":, ri.-"4,., t r 1. f/, o a t %/16-4 (Paz e o4aipoisft (b v..) a rt. �f Z fit=' 3 f i rf if t►fIOD ` IS- Cz, Ck16-0 zt000 ff �Ro a' P 4.400, A, *of 7r 900 s.A $ 14 ar 3f, 00 Sg n -ram T-,¢ G 09 & *4 L, FROM : FAX NO. : Aug. 18 1999 01:4BAM P1. ES . INEE.RS! !Ng.. TES PARK SURyEYC�1�S & ENC . Past Of iCe Box 3047 Ta}ephone 970 6 5175 Ethics fflc, CO 80617 FAX received at 970- B -5B15 January 12, 2000 w.O. 2520 Mr. Bois Joseph Tc,wn of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Black Canyon Inn We have examined the submitted development plan and the latest revisions. Et eppears that a few more modifications are needed. The check list attached indicates, with an asterisk the changes we are now making and will provide first thing tomorrow. If you have any questions or require additional Information, please contact ue- Rey yours, Estes Perk Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. Paul M. Kochevar, PE. & P.L.S. No. 15760 President = Jim Sloan FAX NO. Aig. 23 1999 05:06AM Pt ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Diriaa $nx 3047 Estes Park. CO $0517 Mr. Bob Joseph Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Black Canyon Inn - Storm Water Management TOIsphone 97D-586s175 FAX received at 970.586.5816 January 17, 2000 WO. 2520 The enclosed report was submitted to Bill Unnasta when this project was last reviewed several years ago. It was based upon the constructon of 4 buildings. Three of the buildings are complete. Therefore, this report is still valid. if you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Respectfully yam, Estes Perk Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P .. S. No. 15780 President cc: Jim Sloan FAX rn. : Aug. 23 1999 05:07AM P3 FROM, t} H Frl oe 04 04 A ' aka A� z-- RE: Black Canyon Inn Development Plan . Storm Drainage Management Mr. Bill Linnaae Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO. B0517 Dear Mr. Linnane: October 25, 1994 W.O. 2520 The above mentioned development plan identifies building envelopes, drives and parking areas for the Black Canyon Inn property. The primary focus in the first phase of this development will. he to construct a new access road, additional parking for the restaurant and parking for new accommodations units. Four new buildings will be added and seven existing cabins will be removed in this first phase. It is our opinion that detention ponds should not be added to this site as it is located adjacentftooatmajor he oreddraint age, i.e. Black Canyon Creek. Delaying int in the basin will add to the peak volume normally experienced by Rock Acres Townhomes located immediately to the south. The utility and drainage plan submitted with the development plan delineates on -site drainage patterns, both proposed and existing. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Respectfully yours. ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. aul M. K ehever, P.E. & P.L.S_, 15760 Per esi dent cc: Jim Sloan FRCltl FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 05 : 08AP1 P4 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN BLACK CANYON INN - DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR : JIM SLO P.O. BOX 933 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 PREPARED BY: ESTES P SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. P.O_ BOX '7 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 NOVEMBER 29, 1994 FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 )5:09AM P5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE A. SCOPE 2 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 C. BASIN DESCRIPTION 3 D. DESIGN METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS 4 E. PEAK RUNOFF RATES 5 - 6 DETENTION POND VOLUME OUTLET SIZING F. RECOMMENDATIONS 7 G. SUMMARY 8 H. APPENDIX 9 I hereby certify that this report for Black Carryon Inn - Development Plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision for Jim Sloan; and that said report meets or exceeds the criteria in the Latimer County Storm -Water Management Manual. Paul M. , P.E. &. P.L.-S- No. 15760 Page 1 A. SCOPE This report is a drainage analysis of a storm -water system to be constructed in conjunction with the development of a funeral services business. Included herein is an overall drainage analysis providing the following detail: 9.. Identification of overall drainage patterns in the basin- , 2. Peak runoff rates for the historic and developed 10-year and 100-year frequency storms at locations in and around the project site. 3. Estimate of the volume of the stonmwater that would represent the difference in runoff between the historic and developed conditions on the project site. The specific details of the required system are Included on the utility plan forming an integral part of the development plan submittal B...... ..PROJECT DESCRIPTION The site is located along the easterly side of Devils Gulch Road about one half mile north of the U.S. 34 By-pass intersection. More particularly, the site is a portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, TSN, R72W of the t th P.M., Lorimer County, Colorado. A full description of the property is detailed upon the accompanying development plan. The property will be further developed as a commercial enterprise which provides acvomodatians services to the Estes Valley visitor. Existing cabins, the Black Canyon Restaurant and the office/conference hall shall remain on the site. Four new structures will be constructed with accompanying asphalt parkingrdrives and walkways Page 2 FAX W. Aug. 23 1999 05: 09(M P7 C. BASIN DESCRIPTION This drainage basin is bounded on the north by the MacGregor Ranch and on the west by Black Canyon Creek. Basin limits to the south and east ate formed by natural ridges. For the purposes of this analysis, the basin as outlined upon the basin map contained within the Appendix shall be representative of the entire project site, l.e. offsite areas ere approximately equal in size and characteristics to the on -site area that do not drain to the proposed detention pond. Storm -water flaWe from the easterly side of the basin to the west. The lower collection point within the basin is at the existing pond near Black Canyon Croak. This drainage condition is not being changed by the development of this site. Hydrologically, this ground cover on this site is characteristically; poor . It slopes rather steeply to the west at a grade of about 12.3% . Grass ever is fair to good although many large rock outcrops exist in the souhterly portions of the site. A significant rainfall event would cause substantial erosion of the shallow topsoil layer. ...„Proposed development will increase surface water runoff rates and volume. This effect will be lessened by adding landscaped areas and seeding other areas with a maintained growth of native grasses. The specific elements of the proposed project are shown upon the project development plan. FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 05:16AM Pi ID. DESIGN METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS The method of analysis used for determining peak runoff rates was the Rational Method as follows: GZ C Cf I A where: Q = peak runoff rate in cubic feet per second C = combined runoff coefficient Cf = 1,25 for the 100-year storm I = storm intensity in inches per hour A = area in acres Time of concentration for ov • flow was calculated using the following equatiory T = 1.87(1.1-C 112 S1 ,3 where: C Cf = adjusted runoff coefficient D = length of flow in feet S = slope in percent T time of concentration in minutes Page 4 FAX NO. : Aug. 23 i999 05:10AM P8 E. PEAK RUNOFF RATESI DETENTION POND VOLUME AND OUTLET SIZING PROJECT: BLACK CANYON INN DEVELOPMENT PLAN W.O. 2520 DATE: 11-29-94 1 OF I. BASIN CHARACTERISTICS SQ FEET ACRES TOTAL DRAINAGE BASIN AREA 532,000 1221 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 101,890 2.33 19.1 % ASPHALT 74220 WALKS 3,200 BUILDINGS 24,276 OPEN AREAS 430,384 9.88 80.9% U. RUNOFF COEFFICIENT C = RUNOFF COEFFICIENT STEEPERHISTORIC C = 0.30 3-15%, NATIVE GRASS (SOME DEVELOPED C IS A COMBINATION OF VALUES FOR HARD SURFACE AND OPEN SPACE AREAS AS FOLLOWS: OPEN AREA C =. 0.30 3-15%. NATIVE GRASS (SOME STEER ) IMPERVIOUS AREA C = 0,95 ASPHALT, WALKS & BUILDINGS COMBINATION C = 0.42 III. 'LIME OF CONCENTRATION ATION TIME OF CONCENTRATION = T = 1,fT(1.1-CX60.RT. D1 (CUBE ROOT OF S) WHERE: 17 = OVERALL BASIN DISTANCE IN FEET S = SLOPE IN PERCENT OF GRADE C = ADJUSTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (APPLY A FACTOR OF 1.0 FOR 2YR, 5YR AND 10YR STORMS) (APPLY A FACTOR OF 1.25 FOR THE 100 YR STORM) HISTORIC DEVELOPED STORM C 13 (FEET) S (%) TIME TIMECUBE RT(s) 2 YR 0.30 1150 12.3 22.0 2.31 2 YR 0.42 1150 12.3 18.8 2.31 2.31 10YR 0,30 1150 12.3 22.0 10 YR 0.42 1150 12.3 18.6 2.31 100 YR 0.30 1150 12.3 19.9 2.31 15.7 2.31 100 YR 0.42 1150 12.3 IV. PEAK FLAW RATES Q = CIA WHERE I = STORM INTENSITY A = AREA INACRES HISTORIC DEVELOPED STORM C I A Q Q 2YR 0.30 1.5 12.21 5.5 2 YR 8.62YR 2 YR 0.42 1.7 12.21 10 YR 10 YR 0.30 2.5 1221 9.2 14.510 YR 10YR 0.42 2.8 12.21 t00 YR 0.38 4.2 i2.21 192 100 YR 100 YR 0.53 4.9 12.21 31.4100 YR Page 5 FAX N0. Aug. 23 i999 05:10AM P9 W.O. 2520 2 OF 2 V. DETENTION POND VOLUME CALCULATION BASED UPON CITY OF ARVADA FORMULA AS FOLLOWS.. V=(Td) (Td)((Od1Td) - K"(Qh Tlt))(60) WHERE: V = VOLUME TO BE DETAINED IN CUBIC FEET Th = HISTORIC 71ME OF CONCENTRATION (MINUTES) 7'd = DEVELOPED T ME OF CONCENTRATION (MINUTES) Q!! = HISTORIC RUNOFF (CUBIC FEET PER SECOND) ad = DEVELOPED RUNOFF (CUBIC FEET PER SECOND) K = FACTOR BASED UPON RATIO OF 7hITd AS SHOWN ON GRAPH IN APPENDIX Qh tad Th 5,5 8.8 22.0 92 14.5 22.0 192 31_4 19.9 V cubit feet STORM Q max 1497 2 YR 5.5 2302 10 YR 9.2 5908 100 YR 19.2 Td Th1Td K STORM 18.8 1.18 1.608 2 YR 18.6 1.18 1_08 10YR 15.7 1.27 1.662 100YR VI. RESTRICTED OUTFLOW DESIGN V-NOTCH WEIR SONG CALCULATION : Q = 1.25 (L.) (I- sa BROAD GRES't tCi WEIR CALCULATION: Q = 5-33(L - 0.2H) H WHERE Q = HISTORIC FLOW RATE L s TOP WIDTH OF THE WEIR (FEET) H = DEPTH OR HEIGHT OF WEIR (FEET) (REF: FLUID DYNAMICS BY STREETER ETAL.) THE CHOSEN WEIR HEIGHT TO MATCH THE 100 YEAR POND DEPTH DESIGN IS: V-NOTCH WEIR OR A H s 9 INCHES AM3 C>E = 192 CPS THEN L = 294.5 INCHES Page 6 BROAD CRESTED WEIR H 9 INCHES AND Q n 19.2 CPS THEN L a 109.5 INCHES F FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 95:16AM P2 E. RECOMMENDATIONS The aforementioned calculations indicate the maximum desirable discharge rate during a 100-year rainfall event of 19.2 c.f.s. The detention volume that represents the increased flow from the historic to developed condition at this flow rate is 5908 cubic feet. Both the peak runoff rates and detention volume calculations represent the site as totally developed in a fashion similar to that shy on the development plan. The existing pond located adjacent to Black Canyon Creek has been chosen for improvement as a detention pond to serve the new site development. As the pond is currently constructed, no additional enlargement is needed. It can store the additional runoff volume as mentioned above without increasing it's size or depth. The selected outlet is a broad -crested weir which varies the outfall rate as the storm -water rises within the pond. This system will somewhat approximate the relationship between peak runoff rates for various rainfall frequency and the detention volumes as previously calculated herein. The details for constructing the above mentioned pond and weir are included with the development plan. Surface flow will be diverted to the pond by adding tvuo culverts beneath the main drive and at some points carrying surface flow along the drive against an asphalt curb.. The proposed drive is designed to have a cross slope of 3% which collects along the south side of the drive against the asphalt curb. Other portions of the basin drainage shall be directed to the pond by svales and over -lot grading. Page 7 The weir will be constructed by embedding landscape timbers in the earthen berm that forms the detention pond. As the outlet area is already covered with mature grasses, no additional erosion protection downstream from the outlet is planned. The grade downstream from the cutlet is also very gentle. This will allow the flow to spread out in a manner similar to the existing drainage oonditian. G SUMMARY it is my opinion that the information contained herein represents an acceptable approach to storm -water management in and around the previously described prolec t site. The analysis and sizing of recommended components provides the framework for a desirable system that can serve to better andlor maintain water quality within the basin. The information contained within this report represents standard and accepted engineering practice. No other warranty is either expressed or implied. FAX NO. : Pug. 23 1999 05:1741 P4 H. APPENDIX INDEX Values of Runoff Coefficient, C Rainfall intensity - Duration Curves Detention Volume Reference Weir Sizing Reference Drainage Basin Map Page 9 MOM FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 9S:1 ational Formula: Q=CIA Q • maximum runoff rate, cubic feet per second C ■ runoff coefficient I m average rainfall intensity, inches per hour A - drainage area, acres TABLE II-7 VALUES OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENT, C Character of Surface Runoff Coefficient, C. Pay :., nt Asphaltic and Concrete Brick Gravel' (decomposed granite, native) .95 .95 .70 .95 Roofs Grass - native ground cover .20 Flat, 3 percent Average, 3 to 15 percent .25.5 Steep, 15 percent or more Grass • 'irrigated .10 Flat, 3 percent .10 Average, 3 to 15 percent .15. Steep, 15 percent or more so i= RE/Ef N= PIIOEPEOT ~STAIR { OR1' u611 D AJ*LGe MAST PLAN T01Yli OP ESTER PARK WTMUN IPM till uO. 0401 propmmd bp Emma AVaK OUPPIEVORB dam PO, wow p1• �. M itifLLASIPZI B. OF000. W4 N flaw-. .wr+ • FAX NO. : Aka. 23 1 :1 FAX MO. : Aug. 23 1999 05:19AM P7 Emu. vp rc ao® air 2.0 K I. rs Yo . Tis TIME limo tob dotdnod d 0aestopel Runoff rdroarwh of Historic Runoff /*Isomr41e(C„) o i 7 3 TV To Formula for Approximating Detention Volume a at QH 1.'J , V =To(--t7 T� )(45-6-go) ,e 1.9 V = Volume tobe declined (acre to* I = Meat* Time of Concentration (minutes) To a . ed 'ins of Concentratton (minutes) ON' 1H+3torEC Runoff (cubic feet per second) Qnz peveloped Runoff (cubic feet par sacaleq K a Factor based apart ratio TH/To as shown" on graph FIGURE 2. a.lt9+1.14f:tel .s.lslon 1 CITYcf I ASVAD.5. - ENGro!MEEP]'1G TRIANGULAR QlETHOD TOR DETERMINING DETENTION VOLUME 4I-6- 791 ►-t• ®ll?irsge 'f. 0F. o ?TM Ei1T FAX VEIL AA9, 23 1999 O5:1901 P8 Chapter clufd Nie,ritr -era a.ridt Control 411 Fig. 8.36 V-notch By expressing in terms of the angle, •Of th V-notrchl, L 2 Hence. 8 „e— v tan 15 lhe exponent in the equation is approximately correot, but the coefficient must he reduced by about 41'0 per cent An approximate equation for a 9O V-notch weir is Q " (8.0.28) in which Q Is in cubic feet per second and if is in feet. Experiments show that the coefficient is increased by roughening the upstream side of the weir plate, which causes the '.)ounclary layer to grow thicker. The greater amount of siow.moving liquid near the wall is more easily turned, and hence there is less contraction of the nappe. FAX FJ. : Aug. 23 1999 05 : 20AM P J DISCHARGE FROM RECTANGULAR WEIR WITH END CONTRACTIONS Figures in Table are in Gallons Per Minute Head (H) In Mein Length (1.) of Weir In Fart 1 3 t/a 1 11h 11h 13/4 2 21/4 21A 22/4 3 4.5 12.8 23.4 35.4 49.5 64.9 81.0 98.5 117 136 157 178 314 200 31 222 33/4 245 4 269 41/4 41h 4% 5 51/• 51/i 53/4 6 61/4 63/4 7 71/4 71/z 294 318 344 370 396 422 449 477 13.4 38.2 70.2 108 150 197 248 302 361 422 485 552 624 695 769 846 925 1,006 1,091 1.175 1,262 1,352 1.442 2,535 1,632 1,742 1,826 1,928 Additional 5 such ff. over 5 ft. Head (H) Inches 22.4 63.8 117.0 180 250 330 415 506 605 706 815 926 1,047 1,167 1.292 1,424 1.359 1,696 1,835 1,985 2.130 2,282 Z440 2,600 2,760 2,920 3,094 3,260 2,029 3,435 2,130 3.609 4.5 12.8 23.4 35.1 50.4 66.2 83.5 102 122 143 165 187 211 236 261 288 316 345 374 405 434 465 495 538 560 596 630 668 702 736 73/a 8 2,338 $1h 2,442 8}f2 2.540 Length (L) of Weir in feet 8% 9 91/a 9yx 93/a 10 101/z 11 111/ 12 121 13 13% 14 141/1 15 152 16 161 17 17% 18 181/: 19 191/3 3 2.238 Additional g,p,rn.fer $ each f ft. a 2.656 2.765 2,876 2,985 3,101 3,216 3,480 3,716 3,960 4,185 4,430 4,650 4.950 5,215 5.475 5,740 6,015 6,290 6,566 6,925 7,140 7,410 7,695 7.980 3,785 3,956 4,140 4,312 4,511 4.699 4,899 5,098 5,288 5.490 5,940 6.355 6,780 7,165 7.596 8,010 8.510 8,980 9,440 9,920 10.400 10,900 11.380 11.970 12,410 12,900 13,410 13,940 5,280 14.460 774 814 850 890 929 970 1,01 I 1,051 1,091 1.135 1.230 1,320 1,410 1.495 1,575 1,660 1,780 1,885 1,985 2,090 2.165 2,300 2.410 2.520 2,640 2,745 2,855 2,970 3.090 Q = 3.33 (L - 0.2H) H1-5 in which Q cu. ft. of water flowing per second. L = length of weir opening in feet (should be 4 to 8 times H) . H - head on weir in feet (to be measured at least 6 ft. back of weir opening). a - should be at least 8H. FROM : FAX NO. : Aug. 23 1999 O5:21AM P10 lb, ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 Estes Park, CO 80517 Mr. Steve Stamey, Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan - Black Canyon Inn Statement of Intent Dear Mr. Stamey: Telephone 970-586-5175 Receive FAX at 970-586-6331 December 27, 1999 W.O. 2520 SUBMITAI-13098 PROJECT LOCATION The above property is located along the east side of MacGregor Avenue, north of Highway 34 Bypass. It is commonly known as Lot 1, Mount View Park and a portion of the Meyer's Addition. The property is 14.86 acres in size and is zoned C-O Outlying Commercial. OWNER The owner of this property is James Sloan. Park National Bank is the only lienholder. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposal has two filing aspects: 1) a development plan and 2) an amendment plat. The development plan indicates the proposed construction of four buildings that are about 36 feet by 60 feet in size and 2 story in height. Each of the buildings will be very similar to the new units built over the past 4 years and each will contain 4 accommodations units. In addition, a larger structure of 12 units is proposed that is about 70 feet by 100 feet and 3 levels in height. In order to accommodate a growing need for employee housing, some of the existing cabins will be relocated and then renovated for housing. the primary need is in the summer and usually the employees are college age, sharing a vehicle or with a bicycle. Some additional drive construction is required with associated parking. Utility lines will be extend further to the east to serve the new units. Page 1 December 27, 1999 W.O. 2520 Steve Stamey SETBACK A reduced setback is proposed along the lot line adjacent to the church. This was done at their request as it will protect their view to Longs Peak if the new building is kept further to the east. AMENDED PLAT A lot line adjustment is proposed to eliminate any conflict caused by the location of the existing line. So far, the only problem it has caused is an additional setback for the sign at the entry road along MacGregor Ave. It will also allow for ease in financing by having two distinct lots. If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully yours, Estes j'ark Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. Paul M. Kochevar, PE & PLS 15760 President cc: James Sloan Page 2 Lot 1, HOU%T VIEW PARK AND A PORTION OF MEYERS ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, the entirety of whit: is described as follows: Commencing at the East Quarter corner of Section 24, Township 5 No"th, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., thence South 66.27' West a distance of 1607.50 feet to a point on the North line at the Stanley Addition to the Town of Estes Park; thence North a distance of 135.00 feet to the Northeast corner of the tract described in Book 1433 at Page 116 of the Lariaer County records end the TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING; thence North a distance of 359.50 feet; thence North 88'46' West a distance of 318.60 feet; thence Nc. th 63' 08' West a distance of 60'40 feet; thence North 04'Ol' '+ast a distance of 268.40 feat; thence South 89'01' West a distance of 254.50 feet; `'.nce South 72631' West a distance of 144.90 feat to the Northeast corner of the Bishop and Diocese of Colorado Props=ty; thence the following three courses and distances along the perimeter of the Bishop and Diocese of Colorado Property; thence South 15'52' East a distance of 96.85 feet; thence South 31'01' West a distance of 123.85 feet; thence South 85'06' West a distance of 332.26 feet to the Easterly right of way line of MacGregor Lane; thence South 15" 07' West a distance of„508.40 feet along the Easterly right of way of MacGregor Lane to the Northwest corner of Rock Acres Addition to the Town ot.Estes Park, Colorado; thence South 88'19'47" East a distance of 102.72 feet along the North line of Rock t.cr�. Addition to the Southeast corner of Mount View Park; thence South 88'37'35" East a distance of 461.31 feet along the North line of Rock Acres Addition; thence North 34'22' East a distance of 224.00 feet; thence South 88.46' East a distance of 170.00 feet; thence South 0.'14' West a distance of 187.88 feet to the North line of the Stanley Addition; thence South 88'46' East a distance of 196.46 feet along the North line of the Stanley Addition; thence the following two courses and distances along the perimeter of the tract described in Book 1433 at Page 116 of the 'arimar County Records; thence North a distance of 125.00 feet; thence South 88' 46' East a distance of 232.00 feet to the TRUE POINT 0? BEGINNING. All bearings are relative to the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 as bearing North 00'05, West EXCEPT portions thereof described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Meyers Addition tr '•hr Toe', T • y,rk, wn . cu 66'27' West 1607.5 feet from t:‘ Last Quartet ..ura.r of Section 24, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.H., thence North 76' 33'15" West 383.8 feet to an iron pipe in concrete, thence North 31'38' 20" West 240.66 feet to an iron pipe in concrete, thence South 59'21' West 14.90 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, thence South 86'20' West 110.00 feet thence South 01'40' East 55.0 feet, thence North 88'20' East 1i0.00 feet, thence North 01'40' West 53.0 feet to the TRUE POINT or BEGINNING. ALSO: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above described parcel, thence North 88'20' East 60 feet, thence South 01'40' East 30 feet, thence South 88.20' West 60 feet, thenca North 01'40' West 30 feet to the Point of Beginning, County of Larimer, State of Colorado. ESTES VALLEY REQUEST FOR PRE -APPLICATION CONFERE Submittal Date: Type of Application irg Development Plan ✓ Special Review ✓ Rezoning Petition ✓ Preliminary Subdivision Plat ✓ Final Subdivision Plat ✓ Minor Subdivision Plat r Amended Plat r Boundary Line Adjustment ✓ ROW or Easement Vacation IT Street Name Change ✓ Time Extension r Variance r Other (please describe): NOV' 1 9,,1 tali prp% 'o U 14 4 '• totniumllin MUM/ AU am,inwo�m1O General Information Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Record Owner(s) Mailing Address Telephone Nos. Applicant Amendtd. 17eve 4fimcr1 t /an, -The Propose- 3-<Ani f' &i (di Boo Mac &rejor' Lid6 , 4-5f-es o� 35A - ss-Do ti ,eS at Sittek Cdnya� � Co $ S/7 S(e2an. nn✓esfimtvtt:5, ,4 SOD Ma, Gregor Ave., Stcs (` -70) Yo2 - ( O `1' -Si In 5 loam.. FAX Ark, CC SOs►7 Email Mailing Address P3062 Mac 6rejoC Ave. Telephone Nos. (e(7o) YqZ- (dc{e{ FAX Email Consultant/Engineer 4'h5irteeriitC r� Su�Yvtyr'no� r n�_ Contact Person 5 IC CG't'"Z Mailing Address /6 g5 �tiam�`?So&4i.t� ,f��o e1514r$ �rk, co sos l? Telephone Nos. (rk) 586-,Ysa FAX Email :Ir e-t e ces-cce.GOM1, Site Information Total Development Area (e.g., lot size) in acres /Y. £60 S t Existing Land Use Matti -fa": I y1245:cicolt i roposed Land Use Existing Water Service 1gTTownwen None Proposed Water Service v Existing Sewer Service ( EPSD rUTSD rSeptic Proposed Sewer Service Existing Zoning 4-Ac omoc( riorts Proposed Zoning 4 Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? Yes IX Pre -Application Conference Fee ($500 for in -town properites; $800 for county properties; $0 for all variance applications) IX Plat or Plan Copies (check with Planner for number needed) Signature of Record Owner (s) FOR OFFICE USE. ONLY. Pre- pplicati n Meeting Date: Date %% • / ' Time: Revised 12/17/2007 s,!o uu Zgaon ct.cn.,50 IzX 05.9,2g 0. Lt3848 cn z 17. 9 io• Da r, la WA '42 r aiiii,--0,,,a0r4r1 40 N-tiglitaslI4 luf 1301480 SIET, N minbia !... Z 00®<<>1 § Yff 0 En ko; 1 If nso, DO „_.. §1§§§2"0'.... 9Effir66666 (1/0 vft (S 0 0" ( 268.40' 0,01 \_ • logy - •••• Z -� nnmmnnt t i %--siTa/1 .uu/6-6s Nr -- HJNna 21093a9 39. a Z —••441.1 1U r N N N a N N 38113 1SNa'311+1j aY113A't2bltll tI a3 1WMStl 30 3903 02+0 tlls 1lVNdStl JO 391S . ... __ \ \ — ... 96ab 3 IX 3NIl Stl9 9NIVIC £S+0 tl1S H / S5+b tll�, -366LE RESTRAINED 2' D.IP, I 1111aN113 3NpIM3131 aNqq IN VI a311n1SNp • lM 9a1 tl199 IJIa1J333 a3lltllSN: 21 3NOHa3131 s7 OL+1 tl19 a. a` 11VH+I 39a 0+ b0aZ V HCRZ. SCALE 1'=20' VERT. SCALE VAS' ',, \` a A \ 118811V.ei +c bls 331n313S a3n39 NtlS .1. 0311V1SN aat V1J TI11AStl 31 3917 LC'C91S 3J1Aa3S a31S1tl .6/f U3'I1tlN 91 3Ina3Ta31 t tlH�dSp OY3tl 3F9•C tl NOI1JIkLL1.83 .2 iaNJ /N 3JIAa3S .Z 3a13'TN1SN aN1S laH3SStl 11rJaUA11 99+L VIS O r N r O r N r O r m 8([ f oq Eaal —,00'6 — Cl) 920E 022E C) BUILDINGS C BUILDING B - UPPER LEVEL L0 2E —__- F. Fy VO fa Cr M h M �Cti� < N OEM CE :J � 920E BUILDINGS C ,002E 920E ,920E ,000— E Ea 0'b ,02E J BUILDING A BUILDING A - LOWER LEVEL 0 _...:aa:S!ZA a:!..