HomeMy WebLinkAboutVARIANCE Setback expired 418 Stanley Ave 2006-04-26I
Submittal Date:
TOWN OF ESTES PAR
ESTES VALLEY BOARD OF ADJUST
APPLICATION
General Information
lilt L Street Address of Lot: Ci<,
ori to t„,
o4,,,,.<•:e,
m III Legal Description: Lot. ‘15 %
# ID : Parcel
1 "2- ;‘)::`'S 4,5-6)4S-
Record Owner(s): \--rEC `y'1%-AC-
Address:
Ii
II Petitioner's Name:
Address:
Block:
AN E.
Tract:
(c-Dz-4
Subdivision: LA-1 tiE I/A
Phone #:
4
Number
41F-P,,4C
Street Box #
Phone:
City
State
Fax:
Zip
Petitioner is:
Site Information
Existing Land Use:
Existing Water Service:
Existing Sewer Service:
Existing Gas Service:
Number
Owner
Street Box #
1— Lessee
C'FiT
EPS D AUTSD fa Septic
Site Access (if not on public street):
City
r Agent
State
Proposed
Land Use: Q.
Zip
Lot Size: Size: A
Zoning:
AA
Wetlands on Site? Yes r
Specific Variance Desired - Section #:
714 4,171.-1/1411 hn St4
4-
I' Signature of Owner(s) of Record
I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Board of Adjustment Members with proper
identification access to my pr4perty ,• the review of this application.
P
Record Owner(s):
Date:
Statement of Intent: Shall Comply with Standards Set Forth in Section 3.6.0 of the EVDC
Application Fee: See Appropriate Town or County Fee Schedule
Names and Mailing Addresses of all Adjacent Property Owners (within 100 ft., excluding ROW)
1 Copy of the Site Plan for Staff Review (drawn at a scale of 1" = 20')**
1 Reduced Copy of Site Plan (11X17)
**Site Plan shall include the information in Appendix B.VII.5 (Attached). Additional copies of the Site Plan
will be re•uired after Staff Review.
Office Use Only
Date and Time of Board of Adjustment Meeting: vw-ve (D) ac, c6:(3.4 a ori
Town of Estes Park -613,0, Box 1200 -6 170 MacGregor Avenue .6 Estes Park, CO 80517
Tel: (970) 577-3721 -6 Fax: (970) 586-0249 .6 www.estesnet.com
Revised 10/20/04
Statement of Intent
Phalo — Wagon Wheel - Setback Variance
Phalo Construction, Awner the portions
sinf gle stotry 5 and Lot stand alone unit and buildite owa 2 sLoi�� siew ba�r�d'sion
alon�
would like to demolishexisting Y
unit, located at the southeast corner of the subject property. Phalo Constructions lot is zoned RM
— Residential Multifamily and has 15 foot setbacks from streets, and 10 foot setbacks from the
side and rear lot lines. The existing building is 0.6' off of the eastern property line at the southern
most point and 0.7' off of the property line at its northerly most point. We are requesting a
variance of 9.4' from the side setback, with a resulting setback of 0.6' to allow for the
replacement building to be placed in the same location relative to the eastern lot line. We are also
requesting a variance for the existing larger structure on the property near the southwest corner of
the subject property of 2.3' from the street setback, with a resulting setback of 12.7'. The
existing stand alone building is 3.4' and the existing larger 5 unit building is 12.7' from the
northern right-of-way line of Ponderosa Drive, the proposed stand alone building would move the
structure 11.3' further away from the street, helping to improve the safety of the already narrow
street. If the setbacks were reduced as requested, it would allow Phalo Construction a reasonable
place to reconstruct a stand alone unit on the lot, correct an existing setback violation while
improving the safety of Ponderosa Drive. This application is requesting a 0.6' side setback (East
Property Line) and a 12.7' street setback (Southern Property Line).
The remainder of this statement follows the Standards For review found at 3.6.0 of the Estes
Valley Development Code:
1. Special circumstances or conditions: The existing stand alone building was going to be
remodeled however with its proximity to Ponderosa Drive the owner would prefer to demolish
the exising units and build a new unit in the same basic location that is 14.7' from Ponderosa
Drive (an increase of 11.3'). With respect to the side lot line, the owner would not be
encroaching into the setback any more than the existing building, also moving the building
further from Ponderosa Drive brings it closer to the existing buildings and with the Code
requirement for 10' of separation between building the side lot line variance is needed. There are
also two large trees in the area of the exising building and the proposed building, the design is
sensitive the trees and enables both of the trees to stay. The reasoning for the 12.7' setback from
the street is to clean up the existing larger buildings encroachment.
2a. Beneficial use of the property without the variance: There is some beneficial use of the
property through the existence of the 5 unit structure that has been recently remodeled, although
portions of the larger (5 unit) structure do not meet the current setbacks. The proposed
demolition and rebuilding of a replacement unit will decrease the encroachments on this property.
2b. Substantial variance: The variances sought are substantial, however they are equal to or
greater separation than previously existed on the property.
2c. Neighborhood impact of the variance: The variance would allow for the same number of
units to remain on the site while decreasing the encroachments into the existing setbacks.
2d. Adverse impact delivery of public services: There would be no differential impact on
public services with approval of this variance.
2e. Applicant's awareness at time of purchase: At the time of purchase the owner planned on
using the units where it stood however with the condition of the unit and its close proximity to
Ponderosa Drive the owner would like to rebuild the unit further from the road.
2f. Can there be mitigation of predicament other than a variance: No, there is no other
location on the property to rebuild (instead of remodel) this unit without causing parking or other
amenities to encroach further into setbacks.
Conclusion: Said lot is currently zoned RM Multifamily and was purchased with an existing
stand alone unit that encroached into the side and rear setbacks. The owner is requesting a
variance because the building cannot be moved to a portion of the lot in which it would comply
with all of the setbacks. The requested variance is substantial in regards to the setbacks but not
with regards to the current location of the building and, in fact, the approval of this variance
would decrease the encroachment of the building and help Ponderosa Drive to be a safer road.
The variance will give the owner a chance to finalize the renovation of the property with the same
number of units as it was purchased with, and move the building further away from Ponderosa
Drive.
VICINITY MAP
DRAWN 1 DATE
ZSH 102-17-05
111!
o bE:i •
VAN HORN ENGINEERING
1043 Fish Creek Road — Estes Park, CO 80517
Phone: (970) 586-9388 — Fax: (970) 586-8101
SCALE 1"=400'
SCALE ('R0J. NO.
04-11-10
1"=400'
a. c