HomeMy WebLinkAboutVARIANCE Sign 401 S Saint Vrain Ave 1982-06-24TOWN OF ESTES PARK
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF APPEAL
(1976 Sign Code)
DATE: Jrq 24 q62
Address all communications to the Building Inspector, Post Office Box 1200, Estes Park,
Colorado 80517.
This is a petition for a variance of the zoning ordinance. It must be on file at the
office of the Building Inspector, Town of Estes Park, 10 days before any meeting of the
Board of Adjustment.
A $7.50 (seven dollars and 50 cents) fee to cover costs of processing appeals and requests
for variances shall be paid to the Town Clerk prior to any hearing.
The Petitioner or Representative should be present at the meeting.
Address of Lot or Tract: 401 S. af-. Vrcjfl
ofber
q par e nor41, 0or4-ion
Legal Description: LLt Block I Tract
Owner's Name
C.W. ancl Loro
Wilson
Street
o-P 1 o+ 1
Su. WkJe, Mec4,View
QCe.
Address of Owner 1640 — 3r:4 3o-77 Es -I -Pork, co 80517 aDo
Number Street P.O. Box City State ZIP Phone No.
Petitioner's Name Clark ond Mary V./card clloq Es -I -es Flower ve n
Petitioner is: Owner Lessee X Agent
Address of Petitioner 408 C3J.rc6 923 Es4es Flqrk. . co 60517 5864126
Number Street P.O. Box City & State ZIP Phone No.
1-
Specific Variance desired: Sec. 17. sz,k, . 300 - 2 Free s-l-crodin sirs
s kali no+ Lk? closer 44,cln 4 ' 1-0 anj k)u:lid;n3
State why it is not practicable to comply with the ordinance
pleQSe See Q-1-hqckecl
Q4 --Pne
4-e rnen 4- . P icTures
Lj,
he
(additional sheets or data may be attached)
Names(s) and address(es) of all adjacent property owner(s).
Sw;A-fer cibQ Eos4 Side VOaJ S+ore
381 S. S±. Vr-acn
d6c1 -Plurnhin5 411 S. 9+. Vra;t1
E9-I-e5 Pork L um IDe r- Company 4 00 S. s+. \A-Qin
I hereby waive notice of hearing and consent to a hearing on
DATE: OWNER:
cn,AJa,
Signature
Date and time of the Board of Adjustment meeting:
(It is understood that only those points specifically mentioned are affected by action
taken on the appeal.)
Dear Sirs:
The existing, free-standing sign at the Estes Flower Haven, 401 South
St. Vrain was installed in 1968 in accordance with the codes of
Estes Park at that time.
If moved forward to the east, we will lose a parking space. There are
presently four (4) parking spaces in front of the building.
If moved north to the property line, we will lose part of the drive
from the back of the building. The drive is a narrow one and losing
some of the width would make it more difficult for delivery vehicles
to enter and exit.
In either of the above two (2) locations, the sign would be more
susceptible to being hit as it would be more in the traffic pattern.
Also, in those positions, snow removal from the drives and parking lot
would be made more difficult.
It would be financially difficult for us to have to move the sign. We
have had verbal bids of $)50.00 and more to move the sign.
It is for these reasons and the fact that we feel that the sign is in
an appropriate location at present that we respectfully request a
variance to leave the freestanding sign in its present location.
Sincerely,
p I
LJanel
‘rirttild°
Clar, Mary Ward
Dear Sirs:
The existing, free-standing sign at the Estes Flower Haven, 401 South
St. Vrain was installed in 1968 in accordance with the codes of
Estes Park at that time.
If moved forward to the east, we will lose a parking space. There are
presently four (4) parking spaces in front of the building.
If moved north to the property line, we will lose part of the drive
from the back of the building. The drive is a narrow one and losing
some of the width would make it more difficult for delivery vehicles
to enter and exit.
In either of the above two (2) locations, the sign would be more
susceptible to being hit as it would be more in the traffic pattern.
Also, in those positions, snow removal from the drives and parking lot
would be made more difficult.
It would be financially difficult for us to have to move the sign. We
have had verbal bids of $)50.00 and more to move the sign.
It is for these reasons and the fact that we feel that the sign is in
an appropriate location at present that we respectfully request a
variance to leave the free-standing sign in its present location.
S�i�ncere�ly, Want,/
ClarkI Mary Ward
June 22,1982
As the property owner on the North and
West of Flower Haven Flower Shop I do
not feel that thier sign should have to
be moved. I would like to request that
a variance be. granted allowing the
existing sign remsin as it is.
Thant,
Phil Switzer
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Board of Adjustment - July 7, 1982 - Page 2
MARSH - HEIGHT VARIANCE - CANOPY AT "OLD CHURCH SHOPS":
Maureen Marsh presented her request for a 28 inch height variance
for the canopys which will be placed over the flower boxes in front
of the "Old Church Shops" on West Elkhorn Avenue. Mrs. Marsh explained
that to comply with the vertical clearance of 9 feet as required
by the Code would cause a definite disruption of the architectural
continuity of the building. A discussion followed and it was
detelmined that the flower boxes were nonconforming. Member Al
Sager moved that the variance be granted with the stipulation that
if the flower boxes are ever removed, that the canopys would be
removed or made to comply with the Code. Member Richard Wood
seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
WARD - SIGN VARIANCE - "ESTES FLOWER HAVEN":
Clark Ward presented his request to allow his present free-standing
sign to remain within 4 feet of his building (Section 17.66.300
2 of the Municipal Code). Mr. Ward explained that by moving the
sign they would lose parking space, or part of the drive from the
back of the building. He also stated that it would also be
financially difficult to move the sign at this time. Member
Margaret Houston moved that the variance be granted. Member
Richard Wood seconded the motion. Those voting "Yes" Members
Houston, Wood, Wagner, Lamson. Those voting "No" Member Sager.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
Ann E. JenselY,