The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Light and Power 1991-08-01AGENDA Light and Power Committee August 1, 1991 2:00 p.m., Board Room 1. EPPIC Awards Dinner-Estes Park Platte River Request for Financial Support 2. Public Power Week October 6-12, 1991 Resolution and Funding for Activities 3. Reports A. Computer Resources Update B. Project Updates C. Meter Test Board D. Personnel Update E. Rate Study F. Platte River Power Authority NOTE: The Light and Power Committee reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. dy f 9 4Â¢21 1 TOWN oF ESTES PARI< 61'Â·.0 1 4 Â®'4'i MVer' 0'7 -- d.>-AN 4.-940,7/ I .1 Ill A 'L, . *-3 9. t:''i,71 'ti Â· 15 1444239ty# ..et ~493*L ., 9 .40Â¢k~*40Â·*. I , .C,2..... .,4,84'&,4 a.,2 - t-M74.,l~*:t '7/ - ., r Z\â€¢p.Â¥ P / MEMORANDUM July 26, 1991 TO: Light & Power Committee FROM: Rich Widmer ~tj~ Assistant Town Administrator SUBJECT: PRPA Request for EPPIC Support This year's EPPIC Awards will be given out at a dinner held at the Estes Park Conference Center on Saturday, October 5. This is the first time the event has been held as a dinner, and the cost of the ticket is, therefore, higher than in the past. PRPA has asked the Town for a $2,000 contribution to be used to defray some of the costs for invitations and other miscellaneous items necessary for a successful dinner. This will help keep the cost of the tickets as reasonable as possible, and promote attendance at the event. Because the group's work of recognizing outstanding achievements in the energy field is directly related to our own goals and objectives in the Light & Power Department, staff believes the request is justified, and we ask the Committee to approve this expenditure. RW/dh (303)586-5331 â€¢ MO.BOX 120{)Â· e ESII-SI'ARK.,C()80517 0 FAXO{)3)586-281(,ADMINISTRAIION â€¢ IAX(3()3)586-6909011-1[R ep / \ill 2 41 + 49 44*99 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 24 *ti f *,6 #1 -~64* ..4-,49~ 0. , A ' 0-3 1 1.17 1, It) Â·+f C. A:tih~f, 9, 2: . . 0., e,9-'i,2-CÂ¢P..Â· jÂ·k~Â·,/40 .:.- '.~05#~90,;.t;4 , ,-,ji:-:.4.-1)11':2- Â·ffk;:1*4., 1,<9.i'~ i 4 9 41 423)'r 2 "74 2.lk.c'.4 ..' , Ti' , ;7;*f R 3,.4 % , 1 f. X .. 1. 4. 1 11 -rtÂ· -;.fit#â€¢Fil'.'i 1%:,1 j:1'7'1Â·Â£ 5(i-'t- ;,L~) 4 F' ...I ' I.'Â· .' A - Â£1 . - , *f -'-t 'r-,4 1.41 k Plft - 14-, H:- d r 4*avitiwiwit,F-- .' .,.2,0, .MA/44 .j . . I N A-?h....f 1 /' LUÂ·%3 144'2Â·'i lisles Park, Colorado 80517 AE , .~ ' / N A * N July 29, 1991 OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Light and Power Committee FROM: Richard E. Matzke -72 2972 SUBJECT: Public Power Week October 6 to 12, 1991 Attached for your approval is a resolution designating October 6 to 12, 1991 as Public Power Week in Estes Park. This will be the fifth year that Public Power Week has been celebrated on a nation- wide basis and the Estes Park Light and Power Department has participated each year. On several occasions, the department (and the Town) has received national exposure in APPA publications for its efforts. This year, we wish to continue to promote electrical safety and energy conservation during the week as well as community awareness of the department's contribution to Estes Park. The Light and Power Department is requesting authorization to spend $1000 toward promotion of Public Power Week. REM 1,11,Â·phone r 11) D ';80.5 1 41 PUBLIC POWER WEEK 1991 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, we, the citizens of Estes Park, Colorado, have chosen to operate a community- owned, not-for-profit electric utility, and WHEREAS, we are both customers and owners of our public power system and have a direct say in utility operations and policies, and WHEREAS, the Estes Park Light and Power Department provides our homes, businesses, social service, and local government agencies with reliable, efficient, and cost-effective electricity employing sound business practices designed to ensure the best possible service at the lowest possible rates, and WHEREAS, the Estes Park Light and Power Department is a valuable community asset that contributes substantially to the well-being of local citizens through energy efficiency, customer service, environmental protection, economic development, safety awareness, and financial support to the town government, and WHEREAS, the Estes Park Light and Power Department is part of a community of 2,000 publicly owned electric utilities in the United States that through consumer-ownership ensure cost-cutting competition in the electric utility industry to the benefit of electricity consumers everywhere, and WHEREAS, the American Public Power Association initiated Public Power Week in 1987, and it has proven a successful means to educate this community's consumers and the general public about public power's public service mission and community betterment goals; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: that the week of October 6-12 be designated Public Power Week in order to honor the Estes Park Light and Power Department, its customers, policy makers, and employees, who work together to provide the best possible electric service, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: that our community join hands with other public power communities across the nation and celebrate the benefits of public power to our local and national progress. ,. .112* 0, ',Ah 2 4 j 4414* 4* 2< I *Â·' ' <~ 14'4 ' (42* 4.-'' 0 I. *1?f , L. . 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Difyy'Irtry .'/44 â€¢ j q!.10 Of,;-1. xeÂ·'3% 4.: .:'ft:lt .~ P '.,~ .,~p f~-~i~.I Â£, pAR.6,1 4 , 4.4.-Â£ 1-6 4,4..j *ip.0...44 46:4... :Â·Â·~~~~2 14(%*LLJ~:~3.-A:tir FbvEÂ¢ fitÂ·:fj>~C .~140-~- ~,1+I <-~ - e~vT< *t . 4,7~i m~, , oiti,<<i a,&~P,! ''l* 1,Â¢'i? t'.(1> /. f'tip'. ... ,Â·.. n.e# 6 9 1%2*44*41,~.......- z . 16 L '11 *1,16, 7 N j ArNA Uk 1..19 8,7 2.NiltitÂ·1..Â·Â·Â©:ty# , .efhai44e.,r, 6*1~ * Â·Â·â‚¬04 * &:~7!ft--4,:Â·- . 1,i.w.Â·43.. .~,119 4 r~li*, ~'14*&,4&*'Â·. , I liP.'44.Â·j :44.1\4;14 1 . , 4,: tY Esles Park, Colorado 80517 July 31, 1991 OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Light and Power Committee FROM: Richard E. Matzke*LZ57Â»- SUBJECT: 1991 Electric Rate Study-Update Attached is a letter from M.E. Kiburz and Associates outlining some early thoughts on the rate study. We are still is the process of gathering data for the study so some of the numbers and assumptions are subject to change. One idea he is proposing is the concept of seasonal rates for all of our rate classes using a lower energy charge during summer months. Also attached is a preliminary five year projected operating statement. Following is a summary of our existing rates and conceptual changes: Residential Customer charge $2.05/month Energy charge 0.06501/kWh Changes 1) Higher customer charge 2) Seasonal energy charge-winter higher Residential Demand Customer charge $2.05/month Demand charge 5.15/kW (60% ratchet) Energy charge 0.03225/kWh Changes 1) Higher customer charge 2) Seasonal demand rate-winter higher 3) Eliminate demand ratchet 1' C J !:C ' Â·< i /, C ~t ' 1,\ X ( 4() t) 5:;f, f.'jt)'1 11'1(.1,11()11(' 1 11);) '264, .; ; 01 Page 2 General Service Small Customer charge $7.25/month Energy charge 0.07044/kWh Changes 1) Adjust customer charge 2) Remove residential customers from this rate class 3) Seasonal energy rate General Service Larqe Demand charge $9.65/kW (60% ratchet) Energy charge 0.02875/kWh Changes 1) Seasonal demand rate 2) Eliminate demand ratchet REM - M.E. KIBURZ AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers 443 Sugarloaf Mtn Rd Boulder, Colorado 80302-9639 (303) 442-6450 TELECOPY 303-442-7472 July 26, 1991 Mr. Richard Matzke Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department P. 0. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Rich: This letter provides the Town with some of the preliminary concepts which are being considered for the Electric Rate Study. These concepts are subject to change depending on data yet to be received and input from the Town after your review. This letter separately discusses the five year operating statement and proposed changes to the Electric Rate Schedules. Purchased Power Costs - The Town purchases all their electric power requirements from Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) under the following rates; $10.40/KW; and $.0132/kWh with a average of measured demand and twelve month peak demand ratchet. The cost of purchased power accounts for approximately 55% of the Town's total electric costs. The following table shows the measured demand and billing demands for the twelve months ended May 1991. Measured Billing Proposed Month Demand Demand Seasons (KW) (KW) June 1990 11,938 14,321 Summer July 13,121 14,913 Summer August 12,856 14,780 Summer September 12,171 14,438 Summer October 12,482 14,593 Winter November 13,902 15,303 Winter December 20,405 20,405 Winter January 1991 15,129 17,767 Winter February 13,516 16,960 Winter March 13,101 16,753 Winter April 12,335 16,370 Summer May 11,638 16,022 Summer The PRPA rate structure results in a higher billing demands in the summer months. However, the increased summer billing demands are caused by the winter peak use. The Town's current rate schedules which charge the same rates all year and include a 60% ratchet do not encourage use in the off peak season or discourage use in the on peak season. The rate change proposals discussed later in this letter include the implementation of seasonal rates. The proposed seasons as outlined above are based on usage and seasons that the Western Area Power Administration currently use in their power sales to PRPA. The following table shows the average cost of purchases by the Town from PRPA for the two seasons. The table also develops the average seasonal cost assuming the summer demand penalty is shifted to the winter season. . Demand Pen. Average Cost Season EnnIAY- Dollars Adjustment w/0 Adj. with Adj. (mWh) (mills) (mills) Winter 45,448.6 $1,658,756 $174,564 36.50 40.34 Summer 38,909.5 1,458,384 (174,564) 37.48 33.00 Based on twelve months power purchases ended May 1991. If the summer winter demand penalty is moved to the winter season the average costs for the winter and summer more reasonably track the cause of the cost. The lower summer season cost will actual encourage use in the summer off peak season. The higher winter season rate should encourage electric heat customers to control their electric use or even switch to the residential demand rate. Residential - This rate schedule is applicable for residential service excluding electric heat except for customers who had electric heat and were served under this rate schedule prior to August 1981. The residential class code 1 rate accounted for 41% of the total kWh sales during the years of 1988 through 1990. The following table show some usage characteristics of this rate class. Season mWh Percent KW-Mon Percent Winter 18,080 55.7 44,084 67.4 Summer 14.370 44.3 21.276 32.6 Total 32,450 100.0 65,360 100.0 The above energy and demand figures are from the attached Exhibits 1 and 2 and are based on the twelve months data ended May 1991. The energy sales figures are from data provided by the Town. The demands are a combination of estimates I have prepared and measured noncoincidential demands provided by the Town. The demand estimates are still being reviewed and will probably require modification. The Exhibits include a brief description of how the demands are estimated. Exhibit 3 shows each month's number of bills by rate class. The number of bills data was provided by the Town. The above table shows that the Residential class energy and demand needs are greater in the winter season, which suggests that this class probably has a substantial electric heat load which was in place prior to August of 1981. The current residential rate does not provide for tracking the purchased power costs associated with the use of the power by this rate class. That is a portion of the power cost paid in the off peak months is caused by the peak use in the winter months. The current rates spread that cost over twelve month which results in a redistribution of costs between the winter and summer seasons. A rate change proposal for this rate class is a seasonal rate. The summer costs associate with the winter peak would be assigned to the winter season. The seasonal rate approach would provide the customer a price signal which support the load management goals of the Town. That is the winter rate would be higher than the summer rate. This rate structure would support increased use during the off peak summer season and higher winter rates to discourage peak season use. The seasonal rates price signal might also encourage the electric heating customers to switch to the Residential Demand rate and control their loads. As will be pointed out when reviewing the other rate class, it appears the residential electric heating customer class is the biggest contributor to the winter peak. The customer charge for this rate class may need to be increased. This item will be further evaluated as more of the data requests are received. 2 , Residential Demand Rate - This rate schedule is primarily for sales of electricit3 to electric space heating residential customers. The schedule includes a customer, demand and energy rate. The residential class code 2 rate accounted for 8.8% of the total kWh sales during the years of 1988 through 1990. The following table shows usage characteristics of this rate class. Season kWh Percent KW-Mon(1) Percent Winter 4,245,863 63.2 18,187 51.4 Summer 2.477.554 36.8 17.211 48.6 Total 6,723,417 100.0 35,398 100.0 The KW-Months are from measured demand history for June 90 through May 91 assuming 1.05% diversity. As would be expected this rate class uses much more energy during the winter season. The KW-Months are greater in the winter season but not in the same relationship as the residential rate class code 1. That is the percent the winter KW-months is of the total KW-months is less for the Residential Demand customers than for the residential rate customers. If the demand estimate prove to be accurate the statistics for the Residential Demand would indicate that the demand customers are controlling their demands. That is the residential demand rate offers an economic incentive for the customers to control their winter peaks. Proposed changes to the Residential Demand Rate would include: A higher customer charge. A seasonal demand rate with a winter demand rate greater than the summer season demand rate. Elimination of the 60% annual ratchet, however, it may be appropriate to have a seasonal ratchet. Residential Heat Storage - The residential Heat Storage Code 3 rate is applicable for residential heat storage electric loads which are separately metered. Currently, no customers are served under this schedule. It is proposed that this schedule be replaced with an optional/experimental time of day (TOD) residential rate. Since the Towns power purchases are not on a time of day rate this rate may be of a form which provides the following. Customer charge. Seasonal on Peak Demand. None or minimal off peak demand. Non time of day energy rate. The TOD rate schedule would be available to all residential customers with an annual kWh use of 15,000 or greater. This rate would require load research to develop a better data base on how the residential electric customers use electric power by time periods. General Service Small - The General Service Small (GSS) code 4 rate schedule is applicable to business lighting and small power loads of 35 KW maximum demands or less and to residential customers having electric heat as a primary or auxiliary energy source and commencing service after August 1, 1981. The GSS rate class accounted for 21% of the total kWh sales for the years of 1988 through 1990. The usage characteristics of the GSS class are shown below. Season kWh Sales Percent Kw-Month Percent Winter 8,294,252 47.0 25,383 47.3 Summer 9.334.395 53.0 28.320 52.7 Total 17,628,647 100.0 53,703 100.0 Based on twelve months ended May 1991. 3 The seasonal GSS energy and demand figures show that this customer class actually has greater use during the summer off peak electric use period. This rate class includes a combination of commercial and residential customers, it is suggested that the residential customers be moved to an applicable residential rate. The data necessary to evaluate this option is currently being gathered by the Town. It is proposed that the GSS rate schedule be modified to include: Review and change the customer charge. Removal of residential customers. Seasonal energy rate. General Service Large - The General Service Large (GSL) rate schedule is applicable to large users with a maximum demand exceeding 35 KW in any two consecutive months. The GSL class accounted for 26% of the total kWh sales for the years of 1988 through 1990. The following table summarizes the usage characteristics of the GSL class for the twelve months ended May 1991. Season kWh Sales Percent KW-Month(1) Percent Winter 9,686,231 47.2 23,581 47.0 Summer 10.855.898 52.8 26.570 53.0 Total 20,542,129 100.0 50,151 100.0 The KW-Months are estimated using measured demands for the months of November through March and an assumed monthly load factor of 53% the remaining months. The statistics above show that the GSL customers have a greater use during the off peak season. The proposed changes to this schedule include: A seasonal demand rate with a lower demand rate during the summer season. The seasonal rate may allow for the elimination of the annual 60% ratchet. Consideration will be given to including a seasonal ratchet. Five Year Financial Forecast - Exhibit 4 attached shows actual 1990, budget 1991 and projected operating results for 1991 through 1995. The forecast are developed on a cash basis which means that depreciation expense is not shown. The last line on the table is titled "Available for Capital Projects and Other Lawful Uses" this line shows funds available for system capital improvements. The average of projected 1991 -1995 funds available is $606,506/year. The capital improvements for the years of 1987 through 1990 are shown below. Year Capital Expenditures 1987 $239,984 1988 480,682 1989 1,018,164 1990 423,992 Total $2,162,822 Average $540,706 Budget 91 $756,350 If future capital improvements approximate the historical levels the Town's current rates would be adequate through 1995. A five year capital budget should be developed for the electric department. Some of the assumptions used to develop the five year operating statement are outlined below. 1. Revenues from sales by rate class are estimated using rate class unit revenues and kWh sales based on the 1987 - 1990 customer statistics. The kWh sales are linked to the purchases after assuming a 4 6% loss. The final report will include the back up showing the determination of the revenues. 2. The purchased power quantities are based on system load forecasts provided by the Town. The peak demand is converted to billing KW months based on 1990 usage patterns. The power usage is priced using the PRPA rates. 3. The escalation rates for Distribution, Customer Accounting and Admin. and Gen. are based on the trends for the 1987 - 1990 period. The escalation rates are: Distribution 6%/year Customer Accounting 4%/year Admin. & Gen. 5%/year 4. The Franchise and Property Tax is estimated assuming 4.5% of inside revenues. The inside revenues ratio is based on data from the years of 1987 through 1990. 5. The Distribution maintenance expense is increased by $45,000 in 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995 to reflect the cost of four new employees. 6. The transfers to the General Fund is based on 1990 less the garage contribution increased by 5% in each year. The projected five year operating statement is intended as a preliminary attempt which will be up dated once I have input from the Town. Specific Rates - The specific rates will be designed once all the customers usage data has been received and reviewed and a realistic revenue model is developed. The above proposals and future analyses assume the Town will continue the past policy of having the same rate schedules applicable inside and outside the Town. One fact which should be taken into consideration is that if seasonal rates are implemented, individual customers will be receiving different levels of increases and decreases in their electric billing. Hopefully, this summary of my findings to date and possible proposals for rate changes will be useful to the Town for providing input into the Electric Rate Study process. As I have mentioned previously, I will be on vacation from July 27 through August 18. I will be in touch with you when I return from vacation. Sincerely, Max Kiburz attachments 5 . - 0 0 0 - CO CDÂ© 00000 0 1-- 1- 0 2--- 03 rtÂ· CO LO G 24= R - 0 -LCD CO O -1-4 02 2> 6 ce 9 Ne câ‚¬ m 0.7 &* 3 05 -4- 4+ cO -=1Â· 06 CO - O CD 09 00 Ce C-3 03 CO Ce LD -r CO * h h W 0.2 02 -tâ€¢ 0 55 coh m 9 7 CD OR CO r.- r h Lr] CO. cy- cd - 1 0" * r- LCD Â©; CO O ON) CO C\2 & O.2 0 Ar) 03 03 0000--LD - 0000 CO=14 CO =14 0 90 r- .- CU $ CO CD t.- CIO Lf) D- m rho m CO- Ce NOC! LCD 0- IrD- 40 CO 2~ LO 2* f CO C\2 =fâ€¢ - CU ms CO) 02 Lr) =t %%5 & -t r-4 CD CV go- E LCD CO 0/ LCD e <,O N 00 C\i N - ..-1 2~ 02 0 LO LO CD 00 --00-- â€ž cO 00 0 4.r) ceo C\JO 02 <3'3 CO CO CD 0 LCD 00 02 CO .r) 0 t= 2% CD * m N â€¢CD CO LO LCD 1 r YFC') & m r- co~ C,; 160-Lri d COK- CD COG 06 N-06 * -C\2 CDCO t- CD /O Ir) 0- 52- 03 Cl gis - f tr) 0 02 030$ 9 th W 0-0 LCD - CD CD. 02 CO C'â‚¬ e -- e 03 0 CO N CO to -hO>-~14 0 gsÂ°gust cO I 00 0-02 - f 0 00 CD N N = 1 LGCH Câ‚¬-9.-N 9 N Le th W t- 0. 00- t~ ce (c! 0- 00 * 0 CO CO LD Ne CO-CD LCD 00 Gr-r- LCD CD CD P- =14 CD- 0-00 N 1-20 P- OCDCO CD 02 00 00 - O â€¢-rk W co Â£0 03 ..ID CD "1 09 N CO 0 C\2 I i St o O LO CO O _ 00 LO O =11 CD - & O 0 0 03 22* E- OR *- CR -9 CD=-1 9 0 .11 CD.Th mtâ€¢ CO CD CD CD,LCD 03 CO CO CD .1-I CD 2- C.0 2- gi Ce CO cO ce o LrD 0 0 0 2 0 CO-CO CD .Â·tâ€¢ - CD mtâ€¢ 0 CO CO C.2 e Â· C\2- 0 4 90 - 0 0- 03 0- 00- 70 C.7 cn -1- 0 CO LO * 0 0.7 Lf) CU CO Sgogs:g 9 E - W & O 02 00 CO Ln r =1Â· W W co 90 0000.7 0 6 de *ded c; 02 cO 4 â€¢f.3 t- 0 &33 =200 00 =1,0 =11 0 * LCD 0 91â€¢ CO CO CO- CO f CO + CD -0 th zh cO rn =:1. -- CD 0 114 CD # 0 .COOM-Lf) # 03030&003 02 -+ 02 f =1' CD CD Zt UDOD 00 e 03 0 90 %6= 2%Â¤ H *co- â€¢riNG d CO - $ 03 t.O -t~ (DIC CO LCD CD xyÂ· CD <O r. CO 02 co 'ro O LO CD CO E- 03 h m C\} 09- Ce m f CO LCD $ Cl 0 0 CR LD 02 CO Co CO -- - 5 0 * 00 W N 538Â° 9 9 g E 23%0 *29 CD 02 000 0 =r N CO h &. r 0-2. $ 40 0 1 9 1 ./3 N C\2 00 43 * CD a Vi W cÂ·; 0 -r CD CO CO- CD cO CO 03 - N - 0 0 CO CO C.) 03 02 03 0 - 03 CD CO e Â£ 00. O- 0 C-) 02 07 E <51 3 9 (Scicd - CD cu EME K CD e -& 94 Â©COOL~3~1'00 0 -- + O 03 1-0 CO f - -14 0 0 cO -=1â€¢ CD f COCO CD* CO 2- CD) 02 00 CO -- & CC> =r. f. - 0 02 CO CN th -1 CO N D--00 (33 CO â€¢r--1 /0-- O,0- 0- CQ N CO LCD 7 - CO 0.2 Lf"3 - - C\2 -- CO â€¢f-3 0 CO & CO # - CD O CO N CO â€¢ID r--Â©COCDO coe LID CD LCD co O CO -LO CDOCO E- 0 CO. 4 %%2 m Câ‚¬ CR 0 Oce th'41 UD 1 00 U*o G - r- ai r- - co- e- 00- CDC\2 --1 = 43 23 03 - --* CO 0 00 rucu CO OP CD 03 00 -t' # 5 8.2 -2 c) C\2 --1 CC! LCD Â·--4 n 1 00 0 09 - 2-- 0. - -- 73 - e e - ce 63001 CD LO CD CO 07 - O 0-00-CO 0 CO CDC CO C-I) CD hot CO 0 - r- 03 02 LCD LCD O CO u * Ch 43 --1 'CD -# 0% 6 2-- 'Â£) -11* =11 <Ch 07. Cl 0 =1~ rt â€¢-r) 900. *0-0- E-Â£1 83 4 CD- cO ni Â® - CD 2-Â·- 0000 60 0 0 00- 0 rp t- %2% 2 - Tw 03 - =1â€¢ 2-- Ca m- 1 7 - 02 02 he - -- CO - OP 09 COO--1-tâ€¢- 0 03 10 0 CO CO - CO LO CO CD -4 02 02 h LCD + 07 03 CD CD CD CD -r 0 -C\too 0 - 4 4 cc, CO RE U.E.% 4 00- Cd - 0- 05 0 00 00 Coe - br Â© t LID - 0 LCD CO O > CO CO 05 - 02 02 - 0 =14.- LCD 00 0 09 81 -- CO co O 0 1 0 b CO - 0 LO CO LO .O -rtÂ· -000?Lf-3 1 344 M 0 LCD # 0 00 CD mtâ€¢ CD gE 5% -r 00 O,46 0 CO C\.2 0 02 Lf-3 ---1 LCD In CqC\2 CO OD LO- : 02 - 02 02 CO -2 4 CO 07 79 O CO CO CD 02 -- cle .0 0 0 Co OR 1 - 0 - 2 24] E CO 0 0, 2 0, 70-9 "- 1 .m - -E ~6 2 IM - 33 ce ~ ~ 33 , 5%.E,SA 8 Ra midi M 26 46 <26 26 48 45 + 02 CO rt' LO CD -- 02 c-3 -riÂ· â€¢r) e t- 2% b CO 00 CO CO 00 CO 2Â» 2~ 2~ 2~ 2~ 2~ . 4~1 1,220,411 1,085,92 ,071 12,959, 804,538 856,826 .900 1,461,904 ,402 12,098,2 8 9'LI 262'24 t'LOE' I tâ‚¬0 1,105,604 1,140,54 Municipal 194,960 212,58 June July Nov. Dec. **9'6*6'64 094'032'9 24Â£'069'9 989'046'9 892'LI2'9 10*'Â£96'9 +981â‚¬01 60t'09I 9 tI2'69*'9 6t6'899'9 kLI'ISÂ£'9 9860*9'9 2*FLEG'9 S7YLOLL June 30, 1991 (1) I'902 900'98 TES PARK ENERGY- kWh 72 Residential demand 143,640 1@Mod pue 1414 )lied Salsi A Pap{Aold elep BUH[Ic[ tuoid (I) 3219{ @JIA 2,8 pugUIa Ienuapts Eir ED: r= :~IAJ@s t 7/26/91 262.In 73 Residential heat esidential demand idential 193 Imluap!S SNION .. 8%Â° 8 2% M. CD th- O 613 535:E- g 1 *0% 18 2-0-u CO CO Â° 3% G g 0- 0- & =1.=P i:3*08*2 Lr~ O. 0-3 CU CD LO 0-3 cd f CO 1 0,0003Â©00 B.T- a-Z-5, O 0 rt Tr N - *=14003-3.Co 0- 0000 O CR 03 c> c.-5 ,rS -Â¥ *520 255* O 03 -in> 02 =11 C.) El 0 0 0 1-(DO tÂ·- C.O Z~ 2- CO 0.00 Â£ cd *co 31 0 09 02 0 -4â€¢ cO CO 223 CD LCD ry CO cD 2-- 00 0 CO CO Z Q .--1 Â£ 02 COCD 2,3 0 t 53 j cz e C=J a 02 LCD o =1-' -d- --f' > trD N 00 03 6-022 LC) E ,â‚¬ cD CO CO 02 10 0 B o E K Â· Â¤ E- C=3 E- EJEÂ© 9389 h Co COCâ‚¬CO CD N 45 * %1230 988 6- E C.2 - =11 0.02--- 2--- 09 2% N 2-1 1 91 -2 1 = 0,1 2 9 0 CD 1 4 3 7 0 6 - M = 2 Co cz "E C 5 - - .9 4% 45 -6 ~Â° C 52 - Er; cza 4 * A m *E ~3 M & *= -2 a, 0 0, al, al) P o O-53-69 2 OS DS OS U CD J. E- 4-W-%< V .SiI}UOUI Jaq}O .IOj %Â£9 JO 10102; Peol KI41UOUI pOUInSSe Ue pue I[019* q3noit{1 AON Jo stlluOUI 101 S3uipeal .101@Ut .I@UIO}Sno Ienpri{PU! 3,737 3,6 6,519 7, 3,067 3,460 mand (2) 2,719 2,6 3,098 3,0 Aug. _Sept. *t. April May 1991 14,940 17,157 16,760 17,229 15,650 17,878 18,575 22,817 23,719 16,767 15,013 14,774 422,558 DEMAND-KW d June 30, 1991 '@121 1 -3 341 10; OpeloIOO Jo Rued,no) 00!Alas Oqqnd Xq auop Kpnis Peol @41 Numn paleturls 4!SlaMp go' I apnpu! 01 Palsn [PE 6 01SH[ SpUBILIap p ainge@Ul SUMol UIO.I/ 'pUBILIap HlUOUI Mead jo UOUI/Sinoq 992Â£ UO paseq paleUI{193 7/26/91&M04.23 907 JO 4!Sl@AIP pa[IInSSE tIe '10104 peol KI41UOILI E09 9 NUIUmsse paleums LSragle ~43~ 4~ .. 02 Co 0 2- - 0 Cl ZA Â© 0 -4-â€¢CO CO -Coe Z-LOCV ce 6 CÂ·0000 0 - =14 CDCD 55@SEE 39 Â° 02 tÂ» Â«3 O 03 2- LCD El O.2 9- Â¢73 CD OJ "4 =14 1 02 f (33 CO - 2>-C900000 St> 03 0 COC\200 - CO 02 0 0-0 2- CO â€¢ID CD> -r/CO- 0 CD coce-0 CD CO C) CD LID 00- CO ~14 -- CO N CO - - 2 00 & 0 - 2 â€žE Â© 2 9 8 03 E- CO N -- cO =1- CO 03 CO LID 000-0200 2-- eec=rt-- Ri CO --1 CO CO + CO 02 CO - g; CO .ID LO (9 0 - LO CO 2- LOoC (-CU CO N 0 -Col 2.- CD gE - * co ay 03 co 00 C\.7 ---1 00 =1400 <Câ€ž CO CO - CO 02 Cl e co A u g Â·fil CO CO O 00 00 LCD 02 co co 0 <33 07 2 -:M rt- * 0 â‚¬3 N =rco **COO CO Fl CO (33 CU CD CD Co a C\2 - Co * CIO 0 0 S mci 00 - g e C') 40 W | 00Â£-LOCD - co O N 02 & CD - 0-3 0 2- coce CO --4 =r CO C) Cb CD 00 09 - 00 co CO CD CO LO 00 + CO CO- CO CD N CO CO CO .) 6 - O CO - co - 03 0 -1â€¢ 02 2-- Ce co co or-co o a) E E-CO Z~ 02 -- CO ES co 53 8 E e /0 cm CO gs LO - g 9 8 0 8 4 9 22Â°28=co aggeigiZE; CO - CO CÂ·0 --4 C-) CU CO - Z CO CO .fb 02 1 RECE=% ME AN-S ESS@ CO CD 0 -1Â· 02 1.0 CO --r e=CON g <81 CO CO CO C.3 23 P 0000-CD 00 LCD 0 4, C\2.-4 0 9 AS e 0 - =r CO r- LooogRIBE ceo 00 0 LO f O.2 CO CO CD 02 CO i CO CO 0-0 LO - 8 w 2-3 03 * 0 =1â€¢ 0 0 2~ CO - 0 - O/003 (W O O LD 09 CD %01 WE g =r com @3 - c./ 03 ceo - 2~b t- C.1 - â‚¬3 2 CO 00 0 -r 2= A -:C 09 (9 LE) - C.3 CD , LO L.O 0 (000 CO CO 02 0 03 02 a CO CO t-CLON E- - CO ---1 =rl co CD COCU--CO r- Cro 20 0 -r cia 18 S e 0 - CO ---1 CO N Ce C9 .0 - 03 (9 0 2- CU Z-- CID ~000-49-4/- 8 561 0 3 83 ~4 g Er CO N -- 00 CO CO CD C.D -:t~ cO .- r- CO 00 -CO - M cO CO LO EL Ea, -t ~t _ - CO - R i g 0 CO 1 - M~l=E -2 9- 4 i.1 32 E 93 -2 B le -0 .0 5 5 5-2 &510 0 6 O F 06 05 U CD ~ E- 6- ~06 03 DS + - 02 CO * LO CO 00 00 cO CO 00 00 28 26 25 45 45 ob - C\2 00 91Â·' LC) CO 2299*88 .-I 2- t- zw r- r- i- FruggR* - May. Total BI228 II69 9999 6499 9989 9499 It99 Lf99 9:799 99 0889 $7089 ILL9 $19101 2892 2884 2878 28 .8 2901 69250 6II I6II S al!Â£Ias IDJU@D Residential 1833 18 1827 1 40 June 30, 1991 (1) 'Jaaod pUB 143!I }lied salsi Xq papIAold Blep jum!(1 uloid Genral Service Small Residential demand Genral service larce demand pUBUI@p Ie'lua INSIDE Residential heat ledto'un ential ential heat lential r/26/912,ge,61.IL; Genral service 1 SHION,LOOd - CD - CO O 0100 LO (D LO -0-0 N N h co C 010 CD -- LCD P- CO 2 gg EEM - CO E- 02 0 0102 th CD CO LID CO "CO-COCO -4 -4 03 -4 CS CS 1-4 -==r vid:-Ud - 2-2 OU CO CO 00Â°0Â°Â°,22: 8% 38 C\? CDC-3 0 -=fâ€¢ C\2 - 2--v-Coco 312*A 44*445*444 - 09- 4/444* '/1- CO *4#*** #D ** 4, 4â€ž 0 0 1 e IN O O IN e COCONC) CDO CD 03 CU Co O C') Irb 0 0 Irt - t~- 2-~ LCD Ce CD 00 * CO CO =fâ€¢ P- - Ir- O CD Ir- C) CO W <C- oc- 01- (2 rt- CC- e CCS W CO 16 CS 0103 cd CU co~ CO co 0 <10 => tu 00 CO -:14 2-1Ce f O I t- 4 TY LO CD 00 911 0.2 CC> CD 0- *t. e-~C.~~-1 02 <0 - 2.- C.2 - CO E- 0 02 - - 0 0 09 ###,6 44 #** # 49 â‚¬â€ž O Lo 0 + 1-4 0 01-- 0 02 00 - ysggE %182 # CO =r u ]02 CD CD le CD 9 m K e M. cl -:LCD Co rt ./ r. 02 00 Ir- O 012Â»- 0 O.i cd LrS W Ici d CS |co Ce Nor- LO CO 02 2-- co cc~ Oci 0 03 0 t- lcD - 010 -1 .1.1 --. t- COCO N - CO -02Â© - -- 2% 02 01*229 SE cJUUÂ®,0-*'4*995 Cd 4,4,444* *'D 4, #* 4 U .60, 40* *9 4, 40# # â‚¬Â» Â«D Â«> A 2- 00 2-- .0 ItÂ» 0 Â©Ir- 0 >&"jâ€¢CD OLDLf-3 O -t CO .- * 103 0 01 03 0 0 CO CD CO ,Â£-3 -lf' 0-3 e - 03 0 10 0 0| 0 04 cv OC\4 CD th-- co 4 MI 2 Â¥3 32 E'* 3: 212 0 4 - co ce 202 .i U cd /2 1 ~i CS C:51 OJ 83 02(EG -ocic:; 00 0 co- 4*494*4* 0, 04 ## #* â‚¬n â‚¬n 02 03 N CD IN 0 0 02 t.0 -1- -tâ€¢ 00 CD C') O 0 0 g ~ O # LO CO CO b 0 0 b t.* <23 +P- CD 0 -ct- CD ~r) leo_ 0 0 CO. 0 04 04 2-- 9% U g G W S %1 0%8%%%%@ g 03-00 GU O=- Z-(oc,5 i-- - WELS@3 -Jitâ‚¬&1 03 CO 0-44 Câ‚¬ Â·Â¥2: â€¢e~Â»' #0 4 U Â«, 6- g 44: *0 le= #* 49 4* 4.3. 4. Cl= W LD â€¢r) LCD 0 0000 h C\2 02 E- 0 0 LID LO Eggs RRENE 3% Mnal 0 0.-.Cq 0.0.- - r#rrec:1 Cd .;'CÂ¥) 413 0 LCD O VS LE LE> -0 . (0 CO -- ES Z =53 D-*COCD'r-3-1-0300 e -==rz~ 43 Em * g 0 03 0- 02 Â«D= -- -"1~ =11 02 CO 02 CO LCD m N- - -- 44 LO- 4%4 Lr)~ *44,ED~*!D: â‚¬0> 444*## 4 # 'e,4 t:%.0 4,GD: Â·G,D #* â‚¬4 4â€ž <#* 23 -- CO C) 2-- LD Â© 02 |CO 2- 0 7) 0 â€ž * M 03 02 00 2~ CO â€¢0 02 1 CO CO CO CD CD 02 LO 73 e- m CR 00 CQ -- LO 2 %1 00-COLOT-irt g Els; CO <33 0 CJLr) oci CO -OJOCD--t 52 N M 02.--4 CO --4 Ir) 0 2252 222 3 â‚¬0,Â«D Ge! *9 40##*e -> EE 0 -5. O to N 22 C=- . 0- 0 W .26 .2 Â£Â© m F _2@ 0-g 5 CO--C -M M CO ..0 --4- 0 220- .111114111 EN~*3 Z 05 .2. E N, M -6 1 -*c&!cou~cnE=EM 0 3 coo~co =-Sci#OCOE tw S C/D 0 0 F- # a. E CD < E-- 0. a., m g v = = ti b co = P 13 01 00 = -5; = 6. - = 4 co 67 M 4- a.> Â·-- 4 0 -CS{Ot=-in C.3 O ZE- %9'98 1993 1994 1995 idential 3,075,019 229'I64 CIO'949$ 9*I '999$ 21Â£'284$ 4Â£2249$ Â£99'LtÂ£$ 990'6I9$ sesft Injael 13410 9 099*099$ 069'889$ 092.*9,1 OFZ.29*$ pun uas 01 Ja 20t'2907$ Â£06'III'It 299' IE'I$ 92Â£'I80'It U!191@ Projected 099'Â£99 8/ 96Â£ 1 464 Five Year Projec d eraling Statement 9Â£t'9I9'*$ 980'9It'11 stes Park Department EXHIBIT 4 $3,011,858 $3,126,000 ng Income spagold Iuirde 3 .IOJ 8[qe[{eAÂ¥ . Service Small ice large qun000 7/26/91Â£gbynl.LU Revenues Revenue aou U e DA{291