The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Light and Power 1986-02-05LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 5, 1986 AGENDA 1. GENERAL SERVICE - LARGE TARIFF 2. MARY'S LAKE SUBSTATION - CONSULTANT SELECTION 3. DERRICK TRUCK - AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE 4, FINANCE' OFFICE COPIER 4 REPORTS: A. SHUT OFFS B. NEW BILLING - CUSTOMER COMMENTS C. GENERAL SERVICE - SMALL TARIFF - CHURCHES 4 8906 - Green 1206 - White -. -RE-egg 9-1001_ _b.*sre,CT - ELEC. 8,2.-L,wd'Â·SPT/ORS 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ac:r ;,6 Pri *92.1 -Pee.92$,7-- -- - Dem*.4 .Al e.7â‚¬.r i â€¢0~ . : 41.2, 1. 2>,il, 99 1,30 rAGâ‚¬r '-9070 4- 56 b/7se- 1 1, 1 ..85 . 43/hoo i . -4424Â£20 -_ 1 2 ~7 11% -i. -*: #*.~ AZ.*-#.T- 24,702 .._ -1-_- -- ._4:(9170-p 1 - ..i_..99~â€ž,Lob -f: , 1 2* â‚¬ 87? go ..- i 3 4, oo i 7720-4 .. 4 644 00 : 2 3. d400 -_14 2 1 -=C 3 971 ati 1 11 I 3443 00 , ~,4401 e . . 5 1 4,4 ! ; 1.-JU/n-40 33912 00 9 14,6 oc _L -J * i. 609900 \ Â¥A? Â©c . - 7 4 __1_14600 _-4------- --__2=47?~.oc L ~ 1 1 r. 1 8 1! L /12-,V, >1\) 2 05 ipo Â°o #5900 - 3 (050-y 35 4 00 . 3.599 00 i 10 1 1. I 1 //99, 90 2600 4 og608 3 942 oo 11 1 1 2. 5/9/00 5 1\9 / 00 4956 00 ' 12 11 13 1 -5-9489 00 3106/ 00 3562&00 14 15 1 7 i _16- 1 I. . - 17 fre. s e.ur SD 4 39,0 18 Aer. D un A -1 3.06/ 00. 19 D.-â‚¬ 4 37 200 1 20 21 1 22-, ~receRT- .50 4 39 00 1 _23_, Fâ‚¬.IrnArl 35 683 00 24 W erÂ· -b,â‚¬. / 4 756 0 0 -~ TAULÂ© 25 60 . 1 26 1 27 AcT De MA 91 380 9 1 00 t 28 Pr IMA-*7 - 5 5 633.00 29 1239 00 1 1 30 1 11 1 i 11 i i 31 1 11 32 1 1 11 :1 34 11 1 1 , 39 . lili 11 11 11 11 11 11 - 11 11 . ESTES VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT 4401 ELECTRIC BILLS JANUARY 1, 1984 - DECEMBER 31, 1985 0 1984 0 1985 January 4,954.96 January 6,311.70 February 6,380.92 February 6,297.08 March 4,382.53 March 5,297.49 April 4,663.63 April 4,224.26 May 3,374.69 May 3.442.58 June 2.545.09 June 1,681.33 July 2,414.83 July 3,169.32 August 2,368.87 August 2,775.30 September 2,368.87 September 2,718.09 October 2.845.50 October 2,718.09 November 4,446.07 November 3,599.11 December 6,764.96 December 4,086.21 Total 47,510.92 Total 46,320.56 1 OU'N OFESTES PARK . ~ Colo. PUC No... 2 . PLIZ)4 04 CZility Twelfth Revised Fhect No# 18 Oncel, Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 1 8 ELECTRIC RATES .. (Gawn] Sâ‚¬rvice Claigific.tion) Com rany ( GENERAL SERVICE LARGE R-lze (lur TICÂ« or Number) Code APPLICABILITY 7 5 Applicable in Estes Park service territory. I. ' AVAILABILITY RATE This schedule is required for electric lighting and power requirements of consumers having maximum demands exceeding 35 kW in any two consec- utive months. All service will be supplied only through a single meter. This service is available at single or three-phase at the established.voltage of either the Town's primary or secondary distribution system. This schedule is Â·not available for resale service. MONTHLY RATE Demand Charge per kW $9.00 Energy Charge per kWh July, 1984 Purchased .02702 C Power Rider Applied DETERMINATION OF BILLING DEMAND . The billing demand shall be determined by suitable meter measurement of the highest fifteen-minute integrated demand occurring during the mohthly billing period, but shall not be less than the Monthly Minimum Billing Demand. . C MONTHLY AiINIMUM BILLING DEMAND - C . 6096 of the highest demand established during the immediately preceding months of Noverfiber through March. . -- I MONTHLY MINIMUM BILL i N 59.00 times the Monthly Minimum Billing Demand or $50.00, whichever is greater. PAYMENT , Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. 'O 0.0, WErn CONDITIONS OF SERVICE . D---M, Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all j/â€ž~G ~\\ Light and Power Department general and specific Rules and Regu- J.4 lations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set (2 - M . 1 forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file and appro.ved by the Public :U U r.) Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado. | 1 i Â·--~L -1 - 1 The consumer shall be required to properly balance his loads. If the . 7. 1_ -- Â· 4 11 pou'er factor during the time the billing demand is established falls below 90% lagging, adjustment may be made by increasing the , .:./ measured (continued on page 18A) k ' A.A l Advice Latter Na 74 ~Il.~ f >4/744 Issue Date June 9, 1982 Big nature od I-ulor CiacÂ»E Decision or - Town Administrator Authoritr No Egective DA,â€¢ July 10, 1982 nu. 7 4 - 53 62 2; N Â£ 6% 1- 1 2 6 9 d! O l.6 01 J N 9- 1.-- -- Co t.fi b=, o t- 1- UÂ·-Â· 0 - 00 Or LO -T- r.-i 0-- OS 1- '9 03 4- u-, .6 ir C>C g- g-- -- 09 + rn Â© 0_ Â°t E LO 10 - r Ul LO LL 3- 191 112 6 0 - 2 1-) 9- t>g r- r <9 21 - 0.4 M 40 i r- be l.0 - + rt I U i v J r # 00 <3- bo ri 4 - * j Co Ul 10 0 m 0- 1. e - m -- 2 - r r} Lf} 1- 90 g- 9 EL- rCE 317 - 1.0 --0-0- 10 1.- + 01 - 1- a /77 LU 1 10 > 7 5-0 7 -' 0- al o bo Mfa Et - 57 (1 +3 7-- CL - 0- .3 LULU 7 , 0 .' f R R M A 2 2-41 92 33 ~ ~ Wi ..3 5 [6 t>& Ci r-: J _s -2 234 -3 w 2 2 F 4 2 f N 3 32 0 39 c , - ri 27 r (i -i 1- cq K r- -9 (51 lA 2. 2,0 u-1 + 0 g - 4 -n * r- ,-1 . u i 2 9 -9 -=2 45 1.6 56 91 E>J ni tx; ri ri 21, c,-' 01 t>a nl te O 0 4- 4 - 69 64 69 464 &9 +9 +1 &9 +4 bc .--9 --9 ..3 lr) ~9 '3< bo C- W O O SE S S 0-52 O P Â° Â° i T .4 1 - J L 'C r.Â·{ -25 LL I k to -* IA r.i ...9 (,1- Cya .-9 C>0 -T- r. - + 0 Lr) + . O I - - + 0 - un- 53 -4 h CO O ! 2 ro -+ 0--3 I bo g- 0- 62 - - 000029000090 0 50 4.-5241 1- ,-6 0-70 9 + * -J "-1 2 FT -3 In be ri j~ /1 + 20-k? to if- C g-r un-un-- 10 C{ ~ fI) :f LULU Al T./ - t.u- Un -t- _..g --9 1.r) -' t--- *_~- r.- -7 --3 'f -t r O Â« 9-0 # tE E 6 0- Iri J + tri O- I.-2 4 4 (n LU O > O lf: 541 1,<} 4? SE .2--Q- 13- '#L UJ o an -9 1 4 . < 1- ri- ..5 0~ Â«) r 0- 4 1.0 ir- rot>=2 .- 4- cl a (-6 rn fn rn 6-) 4- -4- 4 * 3 g :5 * T d O 7 - CO ir, rO O= r.6 E 1-2 0, , '-6 lyâ‚¬ gr tri b.4 7 -9 0- U, r = 1 J r - <32 b n -1 d --9 r & 9- CO - p r-2- 0- rn In '-6 4 n 1 -7 - 00 00 8 *0 0 009'-JOI 0 A n r % 00, = !3 51 42 Ef 2 9,- Ii: {1 A cor FL 'Il_ -36 ~ F- __g (,3 1- 24 U) 6. Fi- <~- ri --3 '-i - rl (1 19' n m ro :0 + 7 LA =2RR220000â‚¬46 4 3 3 m J o r -- 4 0 * g M 84 J M &2 ft- no <t 6-- f1 06 -3 91 51 ...p- . 1 dp 7 -9 rr) (i rt .0 -2 0 5 -i-- -- -- -i ==* - -.----- M CL (3 01 r- -JI 1 ... .... 0-1- -2 0 < Â· CO ar Cr' 2- C - 1 0 n_ 1- , 9 U F- 67 EVEN: : 070 Q 5, 19/. 4 14-\0 /6 1 51 1,1 64, E REVENUE KWH TO REVENUE REVENUE 4MM . 3+0+V) Â·taUOLSS@OUOO 9 80LA.laS Muled LUUO!Â·leN Eq pasn X'6.tau3 le:tol LUnwku;W lenuuv =~pase40.~nd ~~58{0~5768~ %SOl) + (1.so) 1.OBFold %6L'L) + (lsoo loato;d x asuadx3 0 up40. ssaL j.l p.lu63.lslp) L Bull Snulul 9 Bull = 5ulll[9 KOUDID,Jac slenb3 .laUOLSSODUO] fq %SZ slenb3 BOLAJaS Mied LeuollÂ·UN X.q %92 Isoo loafould EalleA Uapp LH 01Â· uaLD uadsv (MOLaq elnuuo, uloa,) 5u6LLLS Wnlll!.u!Â·W Lenuuv auo!.SSBOUO) 9 BOLA.laS MÂ·led LBUOLJUN Eq pled anuaAeti Lel.01 L Ld0L65 ' ON 10\AllNOD ZI34 SV V1AWB03 9NI 1118 WAWINIW d:. 1179.4 11.-10 I 4 11 61 - HM>1 -lad 1.so] 16.~au3 pase43.lnd . TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mary's Lake Substation Power Transformer & Switchgear Addition Initial Scope of Work Design of substation additions. Prepare specifications for transformer and switchgear. After approval, issue specification for bids, evaluate bids and make recommendations for purchase of equipment. Prepare construction specifications. After approval, issue specification for bids, evaluate the bids and make recommendations for awarding contract for construction. Help with execution of contract. Prepare construction drawings. Review manufacturer's drawings. Make inspection trips, as necessary, during construction. . Revise final drawings, if necessary, to reflect "as built" product. Any other normal and customary work for this type of project. - The Town would like an estimate of costs for the engineering services for this project. Assuming selection of a consulting firm by February 12, 1986, what would be a realistic in-service date for the new facilities? A proposed service agreement should be delivered to the Town of Estes Park, Light and Power Department, by February 4, 1986. BLACK & VEATCH ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS TEL. (913) 339-2000 1500 MEADOW LAKE PARKWAY MAILING ADDRESS RO. BOX NO. 8405 KANSAS CITY; MISSOURI 64114 ;T Mary's Lake Substation January 24, 1986 Transformer and Switchgear Addition Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department P. 0. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Attention: Mr. R. L. Dekker, Director Gentlemen: Black & Veatch is pleased to submit this Proposal for Engineering Services associated with adding a transformer and switchgear at Mary's Lake Sub- station. Our Mr. Haines and Mr. Edwardson enjoyed meeting you on Jan- uary 21, 1986. We believe we have a thorough understanding of the requirements for this project from the site visit and your descriptions of the requirements. We have surveyed manufacturers concerning current delivery lead-time on transformers with responses ranging from six to nine months after order placement; therefore, we believe that the scheduled in-service date of January 1, 1987 can be met. As you know, Mr. Edwardson will be relocating to our Denver office within a month. Mr. Haines is stationed in Denver. Mr. Haines will act as Project Manager and Mr. Edwardson will be the Proj ect Engineer should we be awarded the Mary' s Lake Substation Project... If the enclosed General Services Agreement and Task Assignment 1 are satisfactory, please date and sign them in the appropriate places and return one copy of each for our files. We will of course modify them to our mutual satisfaction should you so desire. Black & Veatch is very interested in performing these services for the Town of Estes Park. We sincerely appreciate being considered for this project and look forward to working with you. Very truly yours, BLACK & VEATCH 2091*k B. 6/ Stables, Jr. Partner dr Enclosures . h .1 ... GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO AND '1 BLACK & VEATCH, ENGINEERS-ARCHNECTS (Diates .......... . CONTENTS ARTICLE 1.0 - SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY ENGINEER ARTICLE 2.0 - TERM OF AGREEMENT ARTICLE 3.0 - COMPENSATION ARTICLE 4.0 - PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF ENGINEER ARTICLE 5.0 - OPINIONS OF COST AND SCHEDULE ARTICLE 6.0 - LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION ARTICLE 7.0 - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ARTICLE 8.0 - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS ARTICLE 9.0 - INSURANCE ARTICLE 10.0 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES ARTICLE 11.0 - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS ARTICLE 12.0 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT ARTICLE 13.0 - NONDISCLOSURE OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ARTICLE 14.0 - NOTICE ARTICLE 15.0 - UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES ARTICLE 16.0 - GOVERNING LAW ARTICLE 17.0 - MISCELLANEOUS ARTICLE 18.0 - INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION ARTICLE 19.0 - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS I GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, effective the................day of .. . . .. .. . ....,1986, by and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO (hereinafter referred to as Owner), and BLACK & VEATCH, ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS (hereinafter referred to as Engineer), a partnership with principal business offices at Kansas City, Missouri. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is engaged in the operation and maintenance of electric utility facilities; and, WHEREAS, Owner may from time to time undertake Projects related to such facilities; and, WHEREAS, Owner may require certain engineering services in connection with such Projects (hereinafter referred to as the Services); and, WHEREAS, Engineer is prepared to provide such Services. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein con- tained, the parties hereto agree as follows. ARTICLE 1.0 - SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY ENGINEER As the need for engineering services arises, Owner will request the services of Engineer. Such requests shall describe Owner's requirements, including the scope of work and the expected schedule. All requests shall be confirmed in writing. Engineer shall review its personnel resources to determine whether qualified individuals are available to satisfy Owner's request. If qualified individuals are available, Engineer will provide a written response describing the approach to be taken for carrying out the assignments, Engineer's background experience and qualifications for similar assignments, the estimated cost, and the schedule for completion. If mutual agreement is reached, Owner will provide written authorization for Engineer to proceed with the services. ARTICLE 2.0 - TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this General Services Agreement shall be for three (3) years from the date it is effective. The Agreement may be extended thereafter by mutual written agreement of the part ies. ARTICLE 3.0 - COMPENSATION Owner shall pay to the Engineer for the performance of the Services the sum of the following amounts unless the compensation amount is otherwise stated in the specific task assignment. ' L 1. The amount of 1.85 times payroll costs for the actual time of personnel applied to the Services. 2. An amount equal to the actual out-of-pocket cost or standard charges for all C .11: 4. expenses incurred by Engineer directly chargeable to the Services rendered pur- suant to this Agreement. Such expenses shall specifically include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following. a. Long distance telephone expenses. b. Standard charges for operating time actually applied to the Services of Engineer's computer center, other computer centers, and Engineer's auto- mated drafting systems. c. Prints, reproductions, word processing, printed documents and drawing control at standard rates. d. Reasonable traveling and living expenses for personnel. e. The actual cost paid by the Engineer to third parties. f. Other direct expenses related to the Services. Payroll costs include actual salary plus allowances for holidays, vacation, sick leave, FICA and unemployment taxes, worker's compensation insurance, and employee benefits including medical insurance, supplemental retirement programs, life insurance, incentive compensation, tuition reimbursements, and other miscellaneous benefits. The payroll allowance, exclusive of holidays, shall be fixed for the term of this Agreement at thirty (30) percent of the hourly salary rate. Hourly salary rates shall be equal to the monthly salary divided by the number of regularly scheduled working hours during the Engineer's fiscal month thus, the allowance for holidays is provided in the hourly salary rate. The Engineer's fiscal month is from the 27th day of each month through the 26th day of the succeeding month. Engineer will submit to Owner monthly invoices for Services performed. Each invoice will be submitted by about the 15th day of the month following the month during which such Services were performed. Owner agrees to pay Engineer's monthly invoice within 30 days after the invoice date and to pay Engineer a carrying charge of 1-1/2 percent per month (18 percent per year) or the maximum rate allowed by law, if less, on all amounts remaining unpaid after 60 days following an invoice date. Owner has the right to audit the time records and salaries of personnel and charges for direct expenses for assignments for which cost-plus compensation is provided. ARTICLE 4.0 - PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF ENGINEER Engineer shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily provided by a professional engineer under similar circumstances and Engineer shall, at no cost to Owner, re-perform services which fail to satisfy the foregoing standard of performance. .. Engineer shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Services. In addition, Engineer shall not be responsible for any contractor's, subcontractors's, vendor's, or other project participant's failure to fulfill their contractual or other responsibilities to the Owner. In no event shall Engineer be responsible for any contractor's, subcontractor's, vendor's, or other project participant's failure to comply with federal, state, or local laws, ordinances, ' regulations, rules, codes, orders, criteria, or standards. ARTICLE 5.0 - OPINIONS OF COST AND SCHEDULE Since Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over contractors', subcontractors', vendors' methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Engineer's cost estimates shall be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and shall represent his best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with electric utility projects. Likewise, since Engineer has no control over the resources provided by others to meet contract schedules, Engineer's forecast schedules shall be made on the basis of his experience and quali- fications and shall represent his best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with electric utility projects. Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual project costs will not vary from his cost estimates or that actual schedules will not vary from his forecast schedules. ARTICLE 6.0 - LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 General. The Ownelr and Engineer have considered the risks and potential liabilities that may exist during the performance of the Services and in consideration of the promises included herein agree to allocate such liabilities in accordance with this Article 6.0. Words and phrases used in this Article shall be interpreted in accordance with customary insurance industry usage and practice. 6.2 Professional Liability. Engineer agrees to defend and indemnify Owner from and against legal liability for damages arising out of the performance of professional engineering services for Owner where such liability is caused by an error, omission, or negligent act of Engineer or any person or organization for whom Engineer is legally liable. 6.3 Other Liability. Except as provided in subarticle 6.2, Professional Liability, dealing with liabilities associated with the performance of professional services, Engineer agrees to defend and indemnify Owner from and against legal liability for damages because of bodily injury or property damage caused by an occurrence arising out of Engineer's performance of the Services. 6.4 Defense of Claims and Owner's Indemnity. In the event a claim for damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement is made against the Owner alleging contributory or con- current negligence of both Engineer and Owner, Engineer agrees to defend Owner against such claim. In such event, Owner agrees to indemnify and reimburse Engineer a pro rata share of all expenses of defense and any judgment or amount paid by Engineer in resolution of such claim . where such pro rata share is based upon the final judicial determination of negligence or, in the absence of such determination, by mutual agreement. In addition, Owner agrees to defend and indemnify Engineer from and against damages arising out of Owner's sole negligence. 6.5 Employee Claims. Engineer agrees to indemnify Owner against legal liability for damages which is the result of claims by Engineer's employees. Owner agrees to indemnify Engineer against legal liability for damages which is the result of claims by Owner's employees. 6.6 Limitations of Liability. Engineer shall have no liability for special or consequential dam- ages including, but not limited to, loss of equipment use, loss of profits, cost of capital, cost of replacement power, or similar damages. In addition, Engineer's liability shall not exceed Engi- neer's available insurance coverage for such liability and Engineer shall have no liability after two years following performance of the task assignment. 6.7 Remedies. Owner's rights and remedies set forth in this Agreement are exclusive and Engineer's liabilities are limited as set forth herein whether based upon contract, tort (including negligence), or otherwise. 6.8 Other Project Participants. In the event other parties are involved in any of the assignments under this Agreement, Owner will incorporate indemnities similar to this Article 6.0 into contractual arrangements with other Project participants in order to protect the Owner's and Engineer's interests. ARTICLE 7.0 - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Engineer undertakes performance of the Services as an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the methods of performance. Owner shall have no right to supervise directly the methods used but Owner shall have the right to observe such performance. Engineer shall work closely with Owner in performing Services under this Agreement. ARTICLE 8.0 - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Engineer agrees that in performing the Services, Engineer will comply with applicable regula- tory requirements including federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, orders, codes, criteria, and standards. Engineer shall procure the permits, certificates and licenses necessary to allow Engineer to perform the Services. Engineer shall not be responsible for procuring per- mits, certificates, and licenses required for the construction of the Project unless such responsi- bilities are specifically assigned to Engineer. ARTICLE 9.0 - INSURANCE During the performance of the Services under this Agreement, Engineer shall maintain the following insurance. 1. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than $500,000 for each occurrence and not less than $500,000 in the aggregate, and with property damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each occurrence and not less than $100,000 in the aggregate. 2. Automobile Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and not less than $500,000 for each accident and with property damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident. 3. Worker's Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements and Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $ 100,000 for each accident. f 4. Professional Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $3,000,000 annual .. aggregate. 5. Umbrella Insurance providing not less than $10,000,000 limits in excess of the limits stated in items (1) through (4). Engineer shall furnish Owner certificates of insurance including the provision that such insurance shall not be cancelled without at least ten days written notice to Owner. ARTICLE 10.0 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES Owner shall supply to Engineer, either directly or indirectly from others, all available informa- tion and data which is required by Engineer. Owner shall also be responsible for the following. 1. Approve all procedures established to govern the relationships among Owner, Engineer, and third parties. 2. Furnish to Engineer, in writing, all of Owner's requirements for the Project includ- ing, but not limited to, schedule milestones; any financial constraints; and any Owner criteria, standards, design objectives or design constraints. 3. Make final engineering and planning decisions utilizing information supplied by Engineer. 4. Provide designated personnel to represent the Owner in matters involving Engineer. 5. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating, and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project; such legal services as Owner may require or Engineer may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised by contractors, subcontractors, vendors, or other project participants; such auditing services as Owner may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any contractor, subcontractor, vendor, or other project participant has used the monies paid to him; and such inspection services as Owner may require to ascertain that contractors, subcontractors, vendors, or other project participants are complying with any law, rule or regula- tion applicable to their performance of the work. 6. Enter into contracts for purchase, construction, or other services with contractors, subcontractors, and vendors; provide financing; and make payments in accordance with the terms of the contracts. Owner may assign any responsibility described in this Article 10.0, Items (4) and (5) to Engi- neer by providing written instructions to Engineer to act as the Owner's agent and assume responsibility in behalf of the Owner. 15 L ARTICLE 11.0 - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents including Drawings and Specifications prepared by Engineer pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by Owner or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by Engineer for the specific purpose intended will be at Owner's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Engineer; and Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless Engineer for all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle Engineer to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by Owner and Engineer. ARTICLE 12.0 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereo f through no fault of the terminating party. Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for Owner's convenience upon written notice to Engineer, and Engineer shall terminate performance of Services on a schedule accept- able to Owner. In the event of termination for Owner's convenience, Owner shall pay Engineer for all Services performed. ARTICLE 13.0 - NONDISCLOSURE OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Engineer shall consider all information provided by Owner and all drawings, reports, studies, design calculations, plans, specifications, and other documents resulting from the Engineer's performance of the Services to be proprietary unless such information is available from public sources. Engineer shall not publish or disclose proprietary information for any purpose other than the performance of the Services without the prior written authorization of Owner. Engineer shall not make any written or verbal statement to any press or news media concerning the Project without the written authorization of Owner. ARTICLE 14.0 - NOTICE Any formal notice, demand, or request required by or made in connection with this Agreement shall be deemed properly made if personally delivered in writing or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the address specified below. To Engineer: Black & Veatch, Engineers-Architects P. O. Box 8405 Kansas City, Missouri 64114 Attention: Head, Power Division To Owner: Town of Estes Park Estes Park Light & Power Department P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Attention: Mr. R. L. Dekker I , Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed to restrict the transmission of routine communications betw-een representatives of Engineer and Owner. ARTICLE 15.0 - UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES Neither Engineer nor Owner shall be considered to be in default of the provisions of this Agree- ment if delays in or failure of performance shall be due to uncontrollable forces the effect of which, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, the nonperforming party could not avoid. The term "uncontrollable forces" shall mean any event which results in the prevention or delay of performance by a party of its obligations under this Agreement and which is beyond the control of the nonperforming party. The term "uncontrollable forces" includes, but is not limited to, fire, acts of God, flood, earthquakes, storms, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance, sabotage, inability to procure permits, licenses, or authorizations from any state, local, or federal agency or person for any of the supplies, materials, accesses, or services required to be provided by either Owner or Engineer under this Agreement, strikes, work slowdowns or other labor disturbances, and judicial restraint. Neither party shall, however, be excused from performance if nonperformance is due to uncon- trollable forces which are removable or remediable and which the nonperforming party could have, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, removed or remediated with reasonable dis- patch. The provisions of this Article shall not be interpreted or construed to require Engineer or Owner to prevent, settle, or otherwise avoid a strike, work slowdown, or other labor action. The nonperforming party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented or delayed from performance by an uncontrollable force, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances and uncontrollable forces preventing continued performance of the obligations of this Agreement. ARTICLE 16.0 - GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. ARTICLE 17.0 - MISCELLANEOUS 17.1 Nonwaiver. A waiver by either Engineer or Owner of any breach of a provision of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other or further breach. 17.2 Precedence. In the event of conflict, errors, or discrepancies between the declarations or Articles of this Agreement and any mutually agreed written task assignment pursuant to this Agreement, provisions of the written task assignment shall be given precedence over the declarations or Articles in resolving such conflicts, errors, or discrepancies. 17.3 Severability. The invalidity, illegality, unenforceability, or occurrence of any other event rendering any portion or provision of this Agreement void shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any other portion or provision of the Agreement. Any void provision of this Agreement shall be deemed severed from the Agreement and the balance of the Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular portion or provi- sion held to be void. . The provisions of this section shall not prevent the entire Agreement from being void should a provision which is of the essence of the Agreement be determined to be void. ARTICLE 18.0 - INTEGRATION AND MODIFICATION This Agreement is adopted by Engineer and Owner as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the Agreement between Engineer and Owner. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, contracts, proposals, representations, negotiations, letters, or other communications between the Engineer and Owner pertaining to the Services, whether written or oral. This Agreement may not be modified unless such modifications are evidenced in writing signed by both Engineer and Owner. ARTICLE 19.0 - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 19.1 Owner and Engineer each binds itself and its directors, officers, partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the directors, officers, partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party, in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations of this Agreement. 19.2 Neither Owner nor Engineer shall assign, sublet, or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except as stated in paragraph 19.1 and except to the extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifi- cally stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release ' or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing con- tained in this paragraph shall prevent Engineer from employing such independent consultants, associates, and subcontractors as he may deem appropriate to assist him in the performance of services rendered. 19.3 Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than Owner and Engineer. -- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized representatives effective the day and year first above written. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By ..................................... Date Title BLACK & VEATCH, ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS By..~~.- ~7-, 1-28-86 ................... 6/ B. J. StabiEs; jr. Date Title .................................... Partner TASK ASSIGNMENT 1 MARY'S LAKE SUBSTATION ADDITION The Engineer shall provide design engineering services, as required, for the installation of a new transformer and new switchgear and associated equipment at Mary's Lake Substation. SCOPE OF WORK The Enginer shall: Participate in design and procurement meetings. Prepare an equipment procurement specification for the new transformer and switchgear. After approval of the specification by the Owner, the Engineer shall issue the specification for bids, evaluate the bids, and make recommendations to the Owner for award of purchase orders. Prepare a construction specification for installation of the new equipment. After approval of the specification by the Owner, the Engineer shall issue the specifica- tion for bids, evaluate the bids, and make recommendations to the Owner for award of a contract. After award of a contract, the Engineer shall conform the specification for signatures. I Prepare and issue construction drawings. Review all manufacturer's shop drawings for conformance with the specification. Make periodic inspection trips to inspect the installation and monitor the progress of the construction contractor. i Modify the construction drawings to incorporate any changes documented in construction records. SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION The expected in-service date for the new facilities is January 1,1987. The Engineer shall prepare a detailed schedule showing the duration of each design, procurement, and construction activity. ESTIMATED COST -- , The estimated cost of the services as described above ~$28,000.~his estimate includes six construction inspection trips and three design and procur*nent eetihgs in Estes Park. ACCEPTED ACCEPTED TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO BLACK & VEATCH. ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS By ................................ By . ~ I)ate 6,/ 13. J. braoies; J;. I)ate V Title ............................... Title .................................... Partner .. m= ' I. . R. W. BECK AND AssocIATES ENGINEERS ANDCON5ULTANTS PLANNING BANNOCK PLAZA BUILDING GENERAL OFFICE DESIGN 660 BANNOCK STREET SEATTLE, WASHINGTON RATES ENVIRONMENTAL DENVER, COLORADO 80204 Telephone: 206Â·-441-7500 ECONOMICS MANAGEMENT 303-623-8166 Telex: 4990402 BECKSEA FILE NO. CC-0000-BD-AA/0006 February 3, 1986 Mr. Robert L. Dekker, Director Light and Power Department Town of Estes Park 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Subject: Design Services for Town of Estes Park Mary's Lake Substation Additions Dear Mr. Dekker: We are pleased to submit the enclosed Professional Services Agreement for design of the proposed additions to Mary's Lake Substation. Based on a 26-week delivery of the transformer and metal-clad switchgear, the facilities could be in-service by the end of December 1986. Please feel free to contact us at any time if you have questions regarding the agreement or the scope of services. , Sincerely, R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIATES 4 *44 ~~Thrley G. Moriarty - - Executive Engineer/ / V HGM:sk (5219D) Enclosure cc: S. C. Jordan Seattle. WA â€¢ Denver. CO â€¢ Phoenix, AZ â€¢ Orlando. FL â€¢ Columbus, NE â€¢ Wellesley, MA â€¢ Indianapolis, IN â€¢ Minneapolis, MN â€¢ Sacramento, CA â€¢ Austin, TX . *. A. 9 2.M W ER . 0 0 . 1.3 & E f & 2 * 2 0 50 (D I '2 Â·5 2 2, N Z 4 0 21 N â‚¬ E g 00 3 . Â§1 .21 3 1 i bo t 1 a W 00 4 1-4 0 CD Â·* N - 60 4-1 0 . re E 12 2. 9 A ~ 4 44 N N 04 3 5.2 21 1 1 2- 5 8.8 = .0 10 ' E E,Q e EX 4 41 1 *61 0 e bo O = 3.-Â· \\ 4 5 0 01 0 r W M PRE 3 ati g 23 â€¢r-1 - ' C M 4, M h a) i A. U 44 - :212 1 2 -s Z W u cA, 22 4 1 0 1% A 0 i e Al co co ro N \9 & A u (0 4 22 8 .8 V \~4 a) 41 bo - O U ' > b ' 4 2 20 000 0 0 8 Â¤ 4 -9 2 6 01 0 .6-1 S .Q J O. 54.= 54 44 q) 0 0 < mk- m le W -52 4 .0 :006.-3 - 4 Q ' M -S U.& i &08.4 3 0 W M v a 0 4 44.0 2 4 I . 4-1 ' co=ac W ' 66 4 A O H I - v W ' ZE .%2 cnee 8 5 4, to ' 0 41 2. 0 + P Do .- 8 # .0 mies .5 42= 0 8 ,* E -2.5 2 @2' M a, 8 00 14 0.15 E N . 0 .4 . W M : 4 3 E O - *.'.'i A. 00 NEEgg E~- 0 to M f. I . 9 0 . O 23,4 OU 00 2 k 1 0 = 0.= 50 & A 61 44 3 , o cd I W 4.- C . W 0 0 M .9 ~ N * Ul > 1- cD oN 1 + 46-1411) 00 300 0 161 tt .1 5 O O r 00 ..4 A N - > bo '-' â€¢ U 4 20 64 < N md 11 'r u 64 CD 0 51 U A. , ..2 4- 9 M Cd CO Ad W O O A , 4- 8-5 9 N w A a 03 0 .. ., Â©HOW- -c S cs CME co bo -4 5 : O ' .ze X , Â·9~ o g â€¢ at) ..4 1-1 : $4 -1 + D boo Â·61 0 Q 4-1 N .w (11 4 Â· E M#YE.8 O Â¥1 â€¢ m W 22 O 415 e 4 A W A Â¢4)Â¢U U L ~ 4.44 00 ' ... v o & 2 1 kE 4-4 .4 â€¢,4 00 k ic 2 - a 2 1 1 2 20 4 -8 g E - -- -1 2-542-g ga-Git--0-2 2 5 1 < 1 1 .8 2 f *. o P 1 3 -5 &22 -- 5 6. 85 - 2 6 6 0. - - E# 4 2 E.84 .' " 2,Â· ' i e w y 4 -0 ,%8 2 8 229.Â§ 22 4~ ckiE :h - N. ' , Â«044 14 u A m k 4â€¢ 4-i Q r t. U W . 0 0 CA Wal 41 0Â£ -, ' ..1 al w 41 â€¢,4 u @ 1 2.5 4 8 mÂ°Â° / . 3 2:' E %8 -2 8 Z 3 * 0 b O - 6 m k 4,1 . .U ..4 41 -0 . 62' .0. 2:89 ... '.'. ... 4 .C tÂ·N Â°0 4 Â° 1 m a. c .9 4. 4 . m ' I. D.Go" 2 0 31.2 8.9.010:.1 09? . U O - =90 6. 07= 51= 2 U 61.2 0 9 2 k ... 4 5. h 1 v E Z . .Ries.E 1 P a, al ./- co , .9 .0 Â°â‚¬40 ~ if '~ co 1.1 ;4 2 2 k .3 . N 44 " , a)40 1 2. 3.9 -:=2 Â· =02-=,1,â‚¬ /9 â‚¬ 1 . Â·5 4 â‚¬ 3 "0 G 9 MAN A -9 2 Â°EeoUÂ° 1 N 3 .3 8.8 3 3 03 1-:3 1 m. I. , : # â‚¬0 - L=~2=== Ill. ,â€žt Vi g i: -= 4 -0 0 -2 2, e.= L 2 -Â§ 2 -g .=- 2 -~ 10 = tt â€¢ 1 . 1 ~ 1 ~ Â¢ 1 3 Â·s W E 0.5 - 11 , I '4 , 1 4 + I 1 U 41 U . = 8 â‚¬ 2 + gig mouc . Wsual A 0 = â€¢;444 . . 4 r: 0 2 .C 0 . ,3 S " O uj k r U > u P-1 al al u. . 3 2- .8 -4 A 44 00 4 H m A. â€¢ rl (ING -~ Â·Â·r .1 C Â·2~52:0â‚¬: " 1 00 - - 61 1 .0 1 - N â€¢ 1 A I A N 0, 1 â€¢ w -0411 61,1 1 4,1 4,) 4-1 :461:â€¢Lot-44 ' , 64 - 64 - m 00 41 -com.ACU=600Â¤ C.0 A 0 4 41 OCOâ€¢-luc c, -~ .Â· ,2: ~ m ~ 2 Â¥-S 8-2.6,1 ~ K *m~ 2 E Z E JJ Q : 0 -- -O CO -O â€¢,4 400Â·WOOHO 60 44 0 ... C.-4 1 ..IL : 1 -* 6 -RE 0 21 U % 45 : U Â£ a 'fj lo Ji -= U -9 t.2 = 23 Z 5 = 8 Â° 5 E M 1 13 : ' /1 -O 1.1 4.4 1 -2.5, st- M B-= 2 9~ -= 5-y-%3 2:E - 6 Z --M m 2-921 em- :M 0 0 0 0 - ~4~ L 9 1 El + =.9 mou 8%32 Â° A308, 2 7 â€¢!. :- g'&% 150 0 z : CO CO O 61 -3 4 .1 If M - = m z ~ -S E 4~ Â·~~ 2~ 0 2 0â‚¬ 9~ ~ ~ -9 k g m & -2 E 1 22 ES & 2- Z % - -a 33Â·G,i : - j m * a E 9 1 ler ./ .~ i , r. '3 8 - 8 U 8 .g : 4 U + C ERM LA o . A E L~2: ir g=Siw% 64 M 4, m .R i i & 1 0 : 2.1 r: , m .O .4 4 11.3 u W = RE,~22 m.-94 o .Su O A r W - # oil/32#91 17Â£/81 3:NfLEOÂ£& : Z.St = 2 â‚¬ 5. S 1 .: U 0 - X 61 U X :3 ' 3 w ot Â·O ~ O 44 4, O W 3 3! 5, C 0.4 0 >, 9 0 2 :S : M US , {It 5 0 0 2.3 = .,4 Y u .0 O >C k Â·9 g'ZvoD r 2 0 8 I -8 .S 41#U- . 0 4 X.: - ~~u~ ~0 3..3 8 2 .5 8 & 6 .9 % A B Â·s y .0 = a M Z 03 k C a, Â·Aual 40| tow . ..1 CO g u - c W bt 00 1- . 4. 2â‚¬ i .1.E 0 - w 2 3. Z 8 2.7.9*rEW+APS HW -â‚¬q*3&AN:il El 6%00: Affs-B -:2 Al@ 2 2 * m *reis 8 -= a Z =-9 Me M 22 CO -E-= B 2 -= -~ 2 a 01 â‚¬ 10 O Â·Â·â€¢.5 < -qu . 4,4,00 co -0 i 8..812*u 4.U e. 83.0.22% ,4,43,9.~ .5 0 w --2 0 Â£64 0% W 8 -â‚¬0- 6Â£..4 0 . % 3 RN NE %.5.0 4 .1 2.% 2 2 '203 6 4, - â€¢ C W -' 2.5 4) U / â€¢.4 WA000*416'00@Â·~t- AJ~ % Ent â€¢-1 . AX A 2 e a - U 00 0 = u C M. 3 ~1 u~ -0 0 0 O 6. 0 A M a U 6. 1- 0 u Z . R.M E '2 E =0 M M tri; a, (11 E -. u 2.- u O 2: 3 0 .~ (10 00 4 au S U 44 0 C C 611 -1 0 4 O&2%~ .C -4 0 w oc 611 ..4 '0 0 2'-UUÂ· 60 u Co C 0 0 . 0 4 -0 N 4 0 3 iE:.i3ig3M5/i83gE Eg: 81'2%0>06.40(00*000 - ..84)=coke H 0 - 0 O p.,O 0 0 OU Q U 0,3 0 CO &0 00.01-01 M 00 4' e A. 6, 4 v M .0 0 sa)!AJO i ec! aq 01 ]UnOLUE 12101 ino sa)!AIDS Jo adoos 341 UnOUIE UlnUI e aq I!!M POS.InqUI!31 sosuad Kil:unoloddo I sasugdxglrou s 49!u.In; oip@1!nbal aq lou Hells 133 1 pue 'lu@!10 241 JO uo!122!104}ne uall 38 leeul.302 1!u?@Insuoo laau 197 IBUOISSajold pal lied AUF JI services shall consist of furnishing "Consulti (herein referred to PROFESS SERVICES AGREEMENT ices relat at s (herein referred to as o uorss!tuqns uodn 'imu!3 u nsuo 3 'sale uet{1 3.IOUI Xq @AOqe pa]EUI!}So 1 et'S jUOUID,-137 S!41 -lapun Wa!10 341 Elotoo Jo alels 543 Sale Aae 'O:1 pa]ImII 30 Title: aftner ani 1& uvisaa Ielluao Date - P. S. A. No. PROJECT Substation Additions ... AND ASSOCIATES e design of a i neers and Consultants o ionpoid ell K 1 S JO slno4 wn of Estes Park February 3, 1986 UlnU!!Xelll Ip S pOJOX@ Wo!10 341 01 S33.IE4O Ielo] 10 DexoIdma Aue isu jele 1 3ds Jo soo AJOS JO ervices to be uos.:ad 10 :23I;su $30!Al@S ed Buiaollo; aas) suo!SiAOid piepu ht and Part I-Scope of Services ) suo!Â§!Aold Iepa JUJUIA 310 10 SUOS.Ia 1.NHI10 loJ Pa RWB2-203Q reement Consulting Engineer 1 force an effect. ADDRESS III.I. Disposition of Documents appl cable laws, such p rt shall be inopera- CLIENT and upon this ainder shall be PART III - STANDARD PROVISIONS R. W. Beck and Associates III-3 i no 3 01. S stat ecifica Documents ransparenc Drawings. Th d 00 qons :ITIVIOU PIJUOO oductio 8 0 10 COS.Ied 13430 'eoel '389 30 asnejaq is Agreeme aseDIal lou pt as spec 01 BI 'splom lo aselqd ents s neer in one 03 without ue KliI?q'laAes -1 E 3 7 1,3 8 I IF Ift h ..4 -3.2 - .2 1 2 .3 1 igg 44.4 101â€¢044-k.44~al >1 m C Ot - 4, 0 0 44 U C O al 01, O -O .I -5 1 1 g 1 8 121-# f a a Ji 1 1 ki i-@ ,.EE 0.= a A-- . 423.mak06 0 8 â‚¬ 7 2 F' 8 9 ..1 2 m m m W â€ž .1 0 - c 4 OCU k O ~BRQuAM~ : -~ .~~W~~~~JJ'~ N 0 : 1 -0 1 K i .1 6 ;4 ag &*5010 0 il fi N mi Es 0 0 = 41 N * 4 % 1 60 0 0 =S . =,255 2, .ME & 4-1 JJ O A . u 2-0 U cmu a e =ge-==% 0-=Mag= : . 2% 2 2 =1 4, Â¢0 co 4 W - # O 9 m U 0 R.: g 4 00.% U U U '2 11 O ..C Z =2 1 Ice Â·Â·â€¢ t â€¢â€¢ S 4, C a w C ..4 22 - o...1 Â° &2 1 E ~ Cl ) h ** * , 14 0 : 3 % 41 2 ta &21 -1 k; 10=31 3.E E-M-* 0.2 91 - 0 3/0 A - M 0 0 'O m: o m =440. 3â€¢ geo & w eouum .318.41*.C.2 ; C 1- 44 .2 :A gg u > 0 2 9 8 ZZ o -0 -== ES = : -= -2 m = -0 .2 -9 2 -2 -2 2 2 8,00=0 U u OC ... 0 .W 3 0.44 0 x ES- 89 3 4 61 .8 Z C 'r! 00 -' Â¤ M# Â¤e E.* ' .B ,% *Ai z e 01 60 3 4 - U 0.0 00 C -2 -2 :m=CE Me & 8 k .2 M a. Â·~ v S 1 ~ 1.-, 'i k A.1 02 % i % 1 .Â§ ~ 2 %34 ~ 8 ~ , t~ ~ ~ u u.0 8- â‚¬ = .2 i m :00 C 1% .4 0 0 4 u.s ...S E m 3 -r g :d~Â·.c :-8 - .3 , k 2 0 - R.% -e m .8 0. W p .,4 ..1 a. 0 Ela wm:,tki figgbstag ..e .gIS, g ..1 0 10%~ .- u E -W 4) 0 41 .2 0 m' â€¢,4 â€¢.4 ./ v 41 44 m.Â§*tr â‚¬ 1 - i .S;EZE '0 O W v U :8 8.1 8 008 :8 C O 4. 4, .A 60 1 .Ail.:=.: 2 - -5 -2 1 ~ 8 00 u k o Â·04 'D @ 9â€¢~t' -' 1'2 8 - 1 â€¢â€¢ ~r 1- 044 m 11 .., ~ : 2 3 a 06,6 U e 2 009 . 02:-aw= 24= 3 1 0 51-29-B= ,;uNUAR: 9 4 5' 9 i a 3 Y 2 5 - .4 0 0- 1 u Al =-um 0 00 emat:gy:94â‚¬3 0.-3006 4 7 0~EkeN -'Id %81 Â§Â§g# . ....1 00= 01: 1; Â¢0 2 = 1.0 g .= 2 . 2:-2-2 - 4.9.9 02 85- <0 > 4 Â·LA -4 14 0 m -O k 0-U 0000 W 00 â€¢ O,..1 41 0 3 , R -9 = 0. 4 1 â‚¬ .- 4 -2 -5 -s i.5 -g , ' m O c co a co 0 .., .. u (D U â€¢.4 m - 4,1 â€¢.4 4 U Q , -1 Â·.4 * 11 w A Â¢01 u u w O .c = 01 U >. 8 64 0 H DO â€¢,4 â€¢.1 00 k 44 a 5~ ~ 8 K *.m & i.2 ~ -2 2 & -2 .S g t; Â·2 3 . B.c 0 4 00 0 W - :*ia:t z ; Es:13Â§:2 g 01 W N 3 Â·O 3 .Â¤ - It 100 1 14 0 00 - 0, 10 */ 1 1 1 - 0 4.1 1 A 60 - 44 44 41 60 bo c m 41 4, . 1 1 -4444 W A O - O 0 - 41 m >. 41 -1 u /4 -0 0 Â·.1 uu 0 0 4-1 0 0 0 04 C a 0-0.0&0 8 44 e 00Â¤Augu 64 â€¢â€¢1 14 4 0 .,C â€¢-1 k U 610 â€¢.4 â€¢C m 0 4 â€¢.1 â€¢A e U â€¢-1 4-1 4-1 01 u O w O ...9 Ai Â£ 02.9 U .S .3 . 1 0 0 1 1 .3: .S "BEs~ 311*o-a -o=Mo~Eviâ‚¬: Â¤ ..A O h a bo OU A- 0 k N m k - 4% .==16.-60 ,C S Q >0 -1 04.0/ ..1 k .1 1, M , . U# 1 U 61 u . .....N - 1 .4 w .8 0'%08"33â€¢,v 00 -1 3:Wili :f H-4 i G . c. Ful:J L u 2 '0 41 00 U -Ma(8 08>,O , .NE==W-=-=a== 1. r-1 00 W Â·A k 41 41 A . m 41 0 S Z :2 61 10 - M 0 64 4 % ty M - m â€¢ C - A Z .9 A M U u. 00 W ED Zac ie W m e l o ZE#e . A Q .4 *273 5 % A 4 13.9.2.% # 7 0 44.9 2 .g - A .0 60 N . 0006.U ./ gao 44 2 41 0 1: 4, :S .3 :u* A 0 -0 4 : WZ Reek, A 1 &21-.g so U 4,=:U N .t: U m 1% * 2, 41 0 % 44 60.~ A 28 4 m . 4, 0 41 w Zad g 0 - Y .9 v . 0 - 0 44 41 A .3 350 21 E j f i -I = 2 -e.. E. EN gER --- ./ 1/9 4 ... =' * e W = 0 'pl O a. 0.30 - C @.2 2 5 =3.44 0 0, C; 6 .: 10 13 O : " ; i .fl & 8 B MI i.2=-M / 2 3 5 -s.= U Â· 5 81 1 2 * a, t a : 1- . 1 1 3-9 @ 2 ge . 8 . 1 : 1 01 : 4 . 4-2 =U ,3 9 2 r: 1,= M 1 0 52,2 - 0 " 0 0 -0 - E 3 o d f 9 J 1 ~ M# w w H A - ~ M Z N .2 2 5.3 -2 2 R 9 .3 1-R M E -= g 2 8 -2 U e E - 6 6-~ w = 2 2- a a -N ., r i g -5 2 f = 2 22 5 - 4 W C' O A â€¢.4 44 W 00 m v ..8184 St .., m 41 W 4 U 0 4 - 5 8-0 -; w go 410>.m'*050* . U .g 21 3 1+ bo # 4 i~ fo '21 U : 2 ,. .S== 02 ..4 10 41 .0 0- 4 + ..4 0 0 0 4 0 :-C..0 . 0 â€¢* 00 09 .'A## 59~ '0 00 -1 41 JAWUm â€¢,4 ;JI"NA - i# .3 -E-3 am . E:3 6Â·Â·5 -i i .2 0- mi E-= RN E m .9 0 0 A 2 00 0- 4 + u u Â·~ u 4,#gN:ty.m . U A W 00 0 0 00 4 0 ..1 W ..1 W . 0 -1 -4 OuuÂ·* m= 0 a = : A m e- e -P N ~ #1 ~ e i;H 3 . 5 - -e IM * 22 1 -2 1 2 E -E m " . 00 ' 44 A 41 U W 64 41) 0 6044 0 0 4,1 0 3 00Â·A .C H A O COM A CD 0-40(44 H 14.= 4)41<0-NABOrOW 44 0 k a A 00 q A. A â€¢A k G 41 4 44 + & O. al Co <000â€¢0 -muuu .4 UO 4 4 (11 4 (O 0 w '0 0 2 A-, .-4 00,00944,080 . O w .-..1 1 0 U A 41 m 4-1 41 m 44 41 v i i . m â€¢0 60 a) a - al 1 41 - 1 00 -O 4, N k 4, 44 . 0 0 4 Ah O â€¢â€¢4 0- 4 0 41 4 u O k ,--4 â€¢,4 â‚¬0 m 11 C A.C W oc .C 44 .c %.N .3 1.2 d z A Â£ 1 d U m 4 Stu C.c Â¢0â€¢* U a; CUOU ./ =i".661~161126.1-Z: il '1.m.:134~430 &14 00=00 .O U 0) 4.1 421 '.2 + A. 0 44 -O al./ 14 9 4 0 834; g t.2, es 1 O 5 i A m 9 % S : g -1 E .E i Z i. '~ Â·2 . B- 2: . -E ~f ,;-E Â·m -* .Q .M ~4, -- -= 8 2 m 2 2 - 0845%. . '0 44 b .0 8 -4 8 0 9 .9.9 00 U.:.9 E u m g 0 - Ang U O U m .2 7 W ..1 Â¢0 - g wo J St k< ' 04 U FI-mu..0 . 64 9 .02@Z S ,8 8 9 - a U.: r.li : 18 8 r. . -i 1.t .i i .1 .R i 1 2 .00 -9 . 0 1: i Z ,%-i PZDUEB E A. 23-N v=60 M w Â·2 Â¥ w U I ,, 41 C % uu Si44 ~ ;J g; 4 j : i:z E .8 g U 0444%Â·O." 41 ' 4 11 -~ /2 -â‚¬g â‚¬ 4 -E U= ~ /28 ., 1 :-2 R + a 1 -N M , w SW m u coz 0# M 1 1 * - o R @ 4 # -~ Â·s :Â·g ~ F.9 : M i 6;t::2..00>,Oom:5Â°e * 3.1 0 3 .A Â·8 1 - -' 6 .6 0- 0, A.2 Â·9 09 =38:LU.0.1. 1 k M Â·Â·â€¢ 2 2 Â·N u ..2 m " % 1 ~&M*.34Ee1 .~47eAÂ£=* f 0- 2 9 '5' t; '2 411 0 '1 b .c o 4 - M N 2 1* -4 -3 i 1 -: 2 1 A 3-5 :2 -,2 C 2 16 7 3 -ou ; Z ile -8 BIX Z . /7 %~ " o te . i 0 a C F c t.: 0. 00 e g al .0 (14 0 ./ . 41 -C -1 :02 .:@St; emito A k i 2 3 W.2 t. te)00- â‚¬1 i.0 9.-2 z= BU =9 = 0 U : 1 ~ g ~ 1 3 t %Â·Â¤ I li S t f.9.8 0Â·-4 8 0.'2 u t~ t u 4, -U 406100/ m 4, , b C A ,; I b # 4, e 0.= 2 ..4 -1 S J :C 8- k 9 8 Y .8 0 m .c A ec x 0 00 k O -al. g.O â€¢P. OC -- e .1 018&: U u 4 .9 0 H W - =U==A# 5 8 5 .t: 1 .s .2 W Z >Â·Â·S A '0 2 oÂ° o Â·3 bo c, -Â·9 N .% :! - > u u w oc m ... 1 .,9 - o m -2 - R 44 m & 3 44 0, 41 4 M A * 2 9 5 9 & 1 - .:E Om &4 0% . 4 4 m - 4 3 % 8 1 # E C 8 + 5 0 @ 5 % 2 51 w CO : 44 1 3 0 ' # 4 11.. %00 M M.S.8,0 #41 ..2 1 3,8.E,3,2 >~ k ', lou '0 x . - C) 8,3 .-U.Â¤ P WOAS POa,u NNEE;:1* 61*801#r r --1 1 2= a A &5 f J %Â·3 @- ~.ga ..Â¤ M a e / v ~ . i . 1 : 4 A w .0 .0 0 44 411 m al m 01 . A & W 2 50.0 00 1.41 .1 -0 00 0 4 4 al 5- I W Eme 5 2 AEi:f1Â°:i%4%38ii&3S M c a 9?m ,0 u. u-Â·.4 - 41.0 0 61 . 41 M r, OCKO ..4 -Co co ..1 Au 4 0 A e u Z '3 2 -001 0.2 m g 244 * 1 2 8 44 R.S 0 0â€¢3â€¢3 4 2 0 2 B 0 2 8 3 @ 8 + 2 2'0 W k *e ..3 t u . U U 14 0 U 41 M 00 . 1.4 0 00 B U COSÂ·0 0 a t. W U 00â€¢0 AUU-WH W A 4,)44 0. 0.0 SUBoon.wroomoÂ·.1 ma, u u..0-u=uu 41 â€¢-1 41 0 Q) 0 ' 0 Â·A A. U 41 00 ,; 4 Â·rl >. 00=0041 9 â€¢ i . t' 1 A- , K. . m. ..10,01 A , 1.1 41.0100 U 41-10'luot .39* 4, = 4, 41 O m ..4 61 0 0 -33 M ,Â° A ed CA+Hme ..4 A 4 4 1 1 . 4) O ,.C mouboal I. =844 = t -* I 1 S -E m 9 U '4 . " ~ . 60 ..1 61 -4 0 0 0 2 0 Â¢ 1 . 415 5 N U.: Y Wifi 1 4 ... M . 2 00 0 %41 U Â£ 8 0 2 5 .0 L z .: 5 ..r Â·Â¤ . 2# o $ I. . 2% 0 ; 1 5 i= 0 2 -0 4 1 2 r 0 u 44 01.9 1 0 . 1, O 1 . t 0% .S .3 1% 1.~ E - % 0 2 Ri M ': 14 . . 1-1 UB 0% U U v E el ' . 2.-1-=80 :, 60 5-4- 1-g 4 ..1 :00 /2/ NER -9 & 12 :3@ E.180. 0Â§ DE]:931 ~ ..%.1 41 12 0 0 - 4 2=: : E 1 5 w # 4 44 44 0 - m , 2 4 + I ..1 - U .0 Â·* 41 00 co -' ' P M _ w bo. O g EN 3 00 8 9 - ' i - u - = li N 2 M J :1 45 ic :A: ima . A .4 .0 Am 41, w W .C 7. - .9 -O 9' W . i . B 00 0. k~6:t:UZE m 44 4 0 .p, 1 00 u e 3 - 9 0 4 6 p , 1 -& 4 1 * 3 2 8 02,: -B Z .=Â· Â° 8 -%-a Iâ‚¬ g 8 --3 1= a : v - 0 4,1 -O 0 61 -8 9 6 -3 -E -s 1 -M L â‚¬ "1 -3 = 1 4 - m , 4 Â· 1 i 1 -2 -2 1 2 7 .8 -:-3 i 01 u Â© 14 9 * 0 44 9 ec 1 * 0 . ' 0 64 r EX., 453.0 S Er=== 2=EM evaNS= 00 AÂ·0 'E .M i :22 + 11 ew - 0 . 1 2 1 3 9 E A : . r.1 - too 0 . U. .0 gae.go 4 2 g .2 -./.5 14 1 i.. U 1.-41 02,01 U :g : 8% 1 :3 9 42 4 1% g .2 . E :, ..1 2 g i M . . 0 0 2 .14 4, 2 % .2 , I , 3 0 4 0 0 Â·Â·-4 ti O, .c 9, m .2 Â· ~1, .0 OU v m v. g U 4 > 9, 44 00 0..4 .0 GO 1 gE a.â€ž)-ul a, 0 1 K 1%1 ENEF~ E -- 2 . % 3 ..1 We 85 2 21â€¢agm S.,2 , all R. 44 >am 0 00 > * 1 ./ Fi 14 006 - 0, . Fi 03. . M.S . C 1 - a .4 0 11 EX 1 8 Â·E 4.4 G . u 0 3 a H =3 9 1 4, C: 0 . A. 4 .0 0 41 0, 0..4 E U ... r= SAU m . fi 61 ' 0 4. 2 64 .. > 00 g -2 E E .1 -5 4&0 :7 7 00 ..M E â‚¬ H 1 2 -5 1 = ZE a N 91 i - : * u N '.. g = 1 % 4 X O.ZI1 2~ aâ€¢ k e .JJ 40 04~%19 0 ': 4 6 9 Z- 1, 2 1. .. . % .9 2 S 2 2 1 N C . 61 - t (11 1 .0 2 80 .0 .r-1 *W 1.4 0,000 -ous,41 0* 0 . M m 41 4 ..1 44 â€¢ 14 00 b - 3 - - U 60 ro W . .%03 00 00 U N 4 0 2 8,3 00' 3 5 R 3 co . m Ou< S N W u CO h 0 U ..1 06 4 - 41 2 0. A 10 * 0 U 2.9 60.C m U 0 -C 10 j 3 : .C m 010 - r.4 m .3 .~ u â‚¬0 4 k â€¢~ -0 44 0 0 0 0 0 4, 0 2 : 4 - 3 . O 0 60 k 41 W o. I 7.2 C 44 4 1.2 4.% .M g 1 C @ 8 % M 8 0 0% 1 4 .% g Z t: 8 3102 â‚¬ 0 9 ,~ ' Â· 2 R v *' ' 6 Z * 21 t: 2.4,2 C % ! O 00 U 01 0 u k U C ,., 00 0 H UUMOU Â·A U.2 u ..1 0. 0 0 arc 0 0. M , CAU- OBU U A. U m m 44 64 60 10 = 44 1,4 0 0 â€¢.4 9 41 .14 A .c '1, Â·'.1 : . III.A. Consulting Engineer's Organizations III.D. Relating to Payment _Â· , III.E. Insurance plicable surance required to be maintained sastmal Xem 10 Â·siaamnooa aoupploooe Aae 30 speaoold aqi (9) paaoxa m 6303.OAU es are orga to be maintained current any claim for 1 neoal smjeIO 343 Iolluoo ail ou easuadx JO UOJIBUI o Al Jes aqi nII83 1tnba 47 30 eouemlog ad 0001 a aanbas 610:1081:tuooqn 81231 JO 'slaulied ualino ue The Consulting Engineer shall a n tain in or (b) corporation Th exclusi ury, proper suadsns 2[; Iumapu 3 Engineer u times cu to the againat all 10 UO pOD Wrl cause PART III - STANDARD PROVISIONS PART III - STANDARD PROVISIONS agent . reven 101 !810)3ellaO gainI383 10 U 0 :tonlieuoo Â·H*I do Su-tao u maailv 03Alas A 10 , 81 U0313 1,GUO3 ':tuamaaigv S 41 JO aoue in Ujs-!:le 243 le laoui 0:,nl!Â·19000 lou I Hs sal R. W. Beck and Associates R. W. Beck and Associates Z-III I-III Beck and Associate i s a partnership insulting to the tent that 8uch s avail- 833 'laautja SUI InsuoO aq 3803 8 2 =013 ue sa 9 1 mnmIxem JO 800358 constr ces t premi al but specific con id ineer shall el eouel 'laamdrnba s ts and actors, wh c shall be reimbureed by its emp BUIpnIOU Â·ayesn qi partners p m changed by a and pens insurance sociates, c. is a corpora- person leaU u 2 43 01 pagneo iaeul.903 8 1: Ins 108 pae 5033773 83 Pateral expenditures ploa ssaldxa Jado agreed socia sec Mie laws consu oriz in Part IV 2 Â· eauÂ·;SuSI 201::Ingaoo aq:; 18UIe3e m UISU 241, .aouail se tative e t ex uodn ijpom sj eao aS Jo adoo pue ad S Ut @9Uet~ R. W. Beck and Associates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT February 3, 1986 Town of Estes Park CC-2027-ES4-AX - Page 2 Part I - Scope of Services I.A. General Scope of Engineering Services. The general scope of engineering services shall consist of the design of the following features of the Project: 1. One new 7,500/9,375 kVA or 10,000/12,500 kVA. 2. One transformer low side bus and cable termination structure. 3. New 15 kV metal-clad switchgear consisting of: a. Two feeder positions. b. One feeder tie switch. c. One main breaker position. /1- d. One auxiliary compartment. I.B. Services to be Furnished by the Consulting Engineer 1. Preliminary Design. The Consulting Engineer will furnish: a. Consultation with the Client, clarification and definition of the Project requirements, review of available data, and discussions of general scheduling. Meetings may also be held as required with representatives of the Platte River Power Authority. b. Ten copies of a preliminary design criteria manual having sufficient detail for a comprehensive review with the Client to establish the general scope of the Project. c. Confer with the Client to review the preliminary design criteria manual. R. W. Beck and Associates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT February 3, 1986 Town of Estes Park CC-2027-ES4-Ax Page 3 2. Final Design. Upon completion of the preliminary design criteria . manual and review by the Clients the Consulting Engineer will furnish the following: a. Engineering services to design and prepare such contract drawings and specifications as are reasonably necessary for the Project. The contract documents and specifications shall describe the work to be done and the materials to be used, and only when necessary, the construction methods to be followed. b. A revised estimate of probable construction costs based on contract drawings and specifications. c. Confer with the Client to review final designs. d. Preparation of initial settings for substation relays. e. Coordination with the Platte River Power Authority concerning circuit switcher protective relaying. g. Assistance to the Client's officials and advisors for the preparation of contract documents, including forms for advertisement of bids, information for bidders, construction proposal, agreement and performance bond, issuing bidding documents, taking and evaluating bids and awarding equipment and construction contracts. h. Attendance at pre-bid conferences, bid openings and pre-construction meetings. i. A monthly progress report to the Client concerning final design progress. 3. Construction Engineering. The Consulting Engineer will furnish the following: a. Office Engineering 1) Consultation with and advice to the Client during construction. 2) Issuing instructions from the Client to the contractor or contractors, and issuing necessary interpretations or clarifications of the contract documents. R. W. Beck and Associates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT February 3, 1986 Town of Estes Park CC-2027-ES4-AX Page 4 3) Review of shop drawings submitted by the contractors for general conformance to the design concepts of the Project. 4) Review of laboratory drawings and supplementary sketches required to resolve problems due to actual field conditions encountered. 5) Preparation Of interconnection drawings and supplementary sketches required to resolve problems due to actual field conditions encountered. 6) Review of contractor's requests for payment and recommendation to the Client relative to their payment. 7) Preparation of any change orders foilnd necessary during construction and submittal of such change orders to the Client for approval. 8) "Construction Record" revision of all contract drawings showing the Project as the construction records indicate it to be finally completed. b. Field Engineering 1) Making periodic visits to the Project site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction to observe, as an experienced and qualified design professional, the progress and the quality of the executed work, and then informing the Client. 2) Observing initial operation of the Project, or of performance tests required by the specifications. 3) Final review of all completed work and recommendation to the Client relative to acceptance. Recommendation of partial or final payment or retained monies or acceptance of construction shall be based on the Engineer's knowledge, information and belief. 4. Consulting Engineer's Responsibility. The Consulting Engineer shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, any subcontractor or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractors' agents or employees. R. W. Beck and Associates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT February 3, 1986 Town of Estes Park CC-2027-ES4-AX Page 5 5. Additional Services. When and as required in connection with the Project the Consulting Engineer will provide additional services for which the Consulting Engineer will be additionally compensated in accordance with Part II over and above the estimates provided for the services described in Parts I.B.1, 2, and 3, except that additional services described under Part I.B.5.c hereunder, will be provided under a separate Professional Services Agreement. Additional services may include, but are not limited to: a. Additional trips to the Project site. A total of seven trips are anticipated for the design and construction phases. b. Preparation of environmental assessment statements and/or necessary engineering data; providing assistance in securing approval of local, state, federal agencies; and assistance to the Client related to public hearings. c. Observation of construction by a full-time resident project engineer Or representative and by supporting staff as required. Such services are distinguished from the periodic site visits defined under Field Engineering and would be provided under a separate professional services agreement. d. Assistance to Client in obtaining tests and checks throughout the construction period such as concrete cylinder tests, survey reviews and tests and checkout of electric equipment and systems. e. Assistance to the Client in preparation of records, data and drawings where records, data and drawings pertinent to the existing facilities are unavailable. f. Consulting with and advice to the Client as to qualifications and experience of contractors, subcontractors, and other persons and organizations. g. Revising studies, reports, design documents, drawings or specifications previously approved by the Client where work has proceeded based on these approved materials. h. Preparing additional documents to facilitate rebidding of equipment or construction contracts. R. W. Beck and Associates PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT February 3, 1986 Town of Estes Park CC-2027-ES4=AX Page 6 i. Assistance to the Client as an expert witness in litigation arising from Project development or construction, and in hearings before approving and regulatory agencies. j. Preparation of exhibits for the Client's use in applying for roadway/distribution line crossing permits and building permits, if required. k. Preparation of operating instructions and manuals for facilities, training of personnel, and instruction in operation of the facilities. , I.C. Services and Data to be Furnished by the Client 1. Records and Data. The Client shall assist the Consulting Engineer by making readily available when required, all existing records, data, maps, etc., that are pertinent to the Project. 2. Legal Services. The Client shall provide all legal services in behalf of the Client in connection with the Project. 3. Insurance Services. The Client shall provide all insurance services in behalf of the Client in connection with the Project. 4. Survey Services. The Client shall provide all property, photogrammetric, boundary, right-of-way, profiles, cross-sections, horizontal and vertical surveys, topographic and utility surveys. 5. Right-of-Way Services. The Client shall provide all property plats, easement documents, records research and contact Of landowners for acquisition of right-of-way. 6. Geotechnical Services. The Client shall provide soils, foundation and materials engineering including borings, probings or subsurface explorations, laboratory testing and inspection of samples of material and other special consultation. - END OF PART I - 4414#,Ne= 'llk Th#*>.-27*.S.. .' . " 244.44 h :â€¢3 - 1 â€ž IN, - 2 :â€ž '' Â¢ I. .2 ... I . , 91-': â€¢ ,Â·~- 24,2 Â·Â· '1 - 1, . 1 Â· Â· - â‚¬ i*g,*4 /Ms...3:,3.Â·,Â«,6-<4414Â»:19... -:41~~~-.$.f-xii*393Â£34151Â·-4441 441:1f ~fft~--Â«4 tÂ·;.-'I-::ta'-efR700;, .2Â·.p~ f*GÂ«2347,:9. r. . '- 4, A Â·â€¢â€¢I â€¢~i, r. sw1.,51r% ,â€¢. . ./ I. - 44-Â¥11â€¢ --1 :69 7 *9*Â«iii 31-4. - Â£01'-'-#*4:~ Iti- â€¢* 1;i~th:Â·411,4?43 ,"I,~,~i ~c 441?32~- *79 i g.1 7 , -12" 4 ~ 0 4*W4 Â£.:14*M ~ '1 tw.LA*1FA#f~TiHINF*##Wew)~:Tr,â€žtÂ·Â¥fy& 1 .~~,9*,.damitto:,14~-i%*41* i:ititt~Â»f<~.-tÂ·- 623.-L, U -- 4-0 - y~BM,fbefi-*~6,~.~90 -u*-* 1 ~ilff~ mt*I,ipiefigitaÂ» 75 '+4.-*-e: -15.-:23 kl::tf -i & 2- . 114,--*RfMLj~Â¥â‚¬3 1 ~4,;,44444*3%4~-~#13~19-14.Â«- 7 I .''E'~4--.*-fÂ©Â·F.:.1- ,: -4-7-0--::LTyâ‚¬t-i ~-rE* 4 . - lipl-- , , Fill.-li7.Fy./allri'.7.i: . d*941:.M,~Ab-4,4 8 Â£.2941.8.4.21. AL.6- 3-4- I 2 - ~11*."FI -9. IM 1/lid.I- r. I - k.:244.4 r, + - . - .3 ?4}31**ttlifi>-fi-Â·-r-Â·u-/<3/q>-; f:'.:41><-9~\>,4.01" ".r .il-41,1-Â·.-~*-Â·~t- -Â·1-24- 3 -p-4-., - . 0 , /44 449 p.- &Â£4.*4 *5 41â€¢k M k a, 1.7-â€¢-.- 5 4- Â·.Â·a-- ,Â·.< t,? *~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ - - Sf-1~I{%233?19,4.t r .f -345-1 .:.:f 11573.-14rp..Wy:.97213.,t..fif.*Â·f f ~- i f. : 1... 16 * - :,:,1 1 -r I.- . : - t , .. yyi-Â·~444â‚¬t:- 3% -ADI<~2,1.t_:,I - ilt,: rf,-I *fli -:6(-3-Â· .1'. i.y.. -Â·4 0 2.ke.2 . - .:; ' + -1.5 ... 444*494/2*ptif+ Â»*â‚¬25.23>ijf.~~.42*jbaÂ·.5Â·bâ‚¬'4Â·1--~~.-(-<thft 5-, ~ .1'62,-~ i421& ' ..21 - . -8.:- cl # ~:192-*390~50--43---:-7 f>4 : ,.--f> â€žÂ«f.8~.33Â·4 0-:9Â·4-5 994 ?3-2~7~-~3-6$1- -i-f-i- -ti 6 -~-i- .9 .flit,-' :: 3*1,.1-; '25 t.~s '2*-3.I :33'f .2-.-A 8 -...i.- ... - - I 496 44*3*3*51.-Â· 342-: .. . - 524-42-Â¥,13 923=N:t<34':,-r, , Uffi<4 02Â·Ges. actiÂ» 1 , - M.*FieÂ· 9 -*-*Rzwxe-Â» 1 4, -- â€¢: '. I - E-Â»4999>9J@3039:*A 23 9:*-'- - -r..: ~Â·, 5 --c-=-0.+ -r -t ~-i fl_Â§3. 3- ----:-:L-:=*.Â· th.-20% 49--9;Er,ji~* Deft .. V -, nÂ· ..,--Â· ~fiturs/JA123/flfirl-#226--ffi - . .1.. 3233-*y:9.--392-t'INE)32 - - - . Â· / â‚¬ 2.:3.~ 1<Wel:I - ffy-j-Â·â‚¬=<*Â«-93144,- 3 r .2-~-, i p- 4-443*ing. -432-5.-,4-_I .1 5 19/~/.- .#.VI/" 7- - - -'LENW=TA / $ 4 - r :%*: ./. . T.31 1'.r-h':-MA'Â¥24 ~ --22.7- --Â·.....~ IÂ» 4; . - -.i,/-~ ..efiti,,;iclf:=1 'ff:*-1 - 6-.:10~ --I. I J -221 -7-2 ----- . u ,--- -*...'.'"I""'ili".ror/...aill dilf-i,1 r.' 1 *M>Aft-Â£ ~3<F - Â· . - 1,==~..r,1 42 ---4 Â£ . i91*1 -2-4 -it--45 4 047 ::h, 1/- u - L---â€¢. Â· I . I . - . - 0%4,6##VA#~Atok .4 , C. . 9%4*1*8Â·9929*?.A?Ir'-0Â·'+ 2 - .-Â·- . 4 -1 -9/ . Â·.0 .. ./ ; 4 -- ' . I , . 1 -, 41@}49I#%*fMFGh_Â·f f:;~ i r-Fo ~t-I fi 1 - 2 24*<WA0 I . 0 1 9.:44*YkE*fiÂ¢45.*-4-*'HTI:vi ,Â·. .....;:. . ~ 734.-gY;NiÂ»t~giQZ-0-3134 t 1 Â·-/- -'' t..#t ...-. 1 /4Â£,219) - S- . - 21~?92%9Â·14*tr):ea:r.... -: : Â·Â·.7 ... 3 - I .1 , -64 Â· â€¢ p:Â£12.-47N@*121/:. . 1 .1- .I Â· 1*lieRSi~ZiliSita~~~AW'EfyÂ· f- fk h. .i -- , - I. I - - ' 21 I -:141 ..Al- - 4. 4, 4 - I - -4 / 1 . . 1. . . ..t . .4 . 9. '16 1-1 I'. I - I ., 9 . -. 4 - . I ./ , 9.. -4.9~-2. .2 :.~ f_ - ; 10 4-â€¢ .r'**Pt-Â§*ift,Wrt-1 Â· r-,- - ... 21. . * ''1 1 ' ' 4/1 2 .1 - 6- - .%47>*f,%4244*~#<bpi~Â¢71:t~~3f f.t , , - r ~*2*fa-,ir; Ii:i.~ E-*.(_ I . . iÂ·; I .. 6 - 2 04.2,-4.#.., 0 -Â·ht - , . 4 F. 1 3 # 192:.7.41 +UftÂ·:.2-1 4.-re: . :- 3.-40*i~~, L., . : f .0 " 2 .. .. .7 ..4 - . i 4/5/*49>4:d,5,40*t~lgfl . -. I :.Â¢* B,~~Traip,~4,t-2.Â¥2:,LE:'21 14Lk,4'-r. 1.1.-0 : ,7 .- cb->45:J. t--.v ktti'-/' 4 I . . .1.- .. . A -- i ... 3 , . . 9 . . , .'.... 4 1. - .1.7 . ..'-- ., 4. d - 1 .1.. 0 . r .14:Â£'07Â·te+ ..4 ,-;tk .0â€¢-Â· -,~ h'/1 4 1 4 9,1, 1 1 ,-25.4.4, ''JJ .. 4, 4 1 - 191 4 lili F-1954 {6x4) METRIC CONVERSION INTERNATIONAL Pounds (lbs.1 x .4536 = Kilograms (kg) S-SERIES Feet (It.) x .3048 = Meters (m) Inches (in.) x 25.4 = Milltmeters (mm) U.S. Quarts x .95 = Liters (1) U.S. Gallons x 3.78 = Liters (1) GVW RATINGS - (LBS.) STANDARD FRONT 9.000 Â£ 2 j . L.1 // 4 4 i REAR 30,000 TOTAL 39.000 ti~ 1 ek-9 - Ica MAXIMUM 13 If]I'll".Ill/"11.-, -/"-.61 FRONT 12,000 2///*/1 <{U 0'~L-~ REAR 38.000 -/<'- -"A..... /t. TOTAL 50.000 .\ lr~.1 MAX. GCW (On Highway) - DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS (w/STANDARD EQUIPMENT) - 90.0 -----f.- - 10Q5BBC--1 1 1- rj Â·. 7 C F -CA --4--*AF 1- 1 10 0, I---'- -7-4 44(Jing 91-9 / 41 '.,Â«15 1 C I ~ 32.5 -- wB . OAL .- WHEEL- CHASSIS WEIGHTS, LBS.* DIMENSIONS, INCHES TURNING RADIUS ' BASE, INCHES Front Rear Total CA CF AF OAL To Centerline With Bumper Of Tire Clearance ! 152 5.125 5.305 10,430 84 135 51 235.5 25 ft. 0 in. 26 ft. 9 in. 170 5.165 5.325 10.490 102 165 63 265.5 27 ft. 8 in. 29 ft. 5 in. ~ 188 5.175 5,410 10.585 120 195 75 295.5 30 ft. 4 in. 32 ft. 1 in. 206 5.370 5.785 11,155 138 213 75 313.5 32 ft. 11 in. 34 ft. 8 in. 218 5.350 6.015 11,365 150 247 97 347.5 34 ft. 8 in. 36 ft. 5 in. 224 5.365 6.030 11.395 156 253 97 353.5 35 ft. 6 in. 37 ft. 3 in. - 'Weight includes standard chassis. oil and water but less fuel. 'C--1 COPY MACHINE FOR FINANCE OFFICE I am requesting permission to obtain bids for a new copy machine in the Finance Office. In the 1986 budget $3,800 was allocated to purchase a new machine. To date I have visited with a Minolta, Xerox, Ricoh, and Cannon Sales Representa- tive and have tried the Minolta and Ricoh copier. Both machines have had an automatic document feeder attachment which I am very impressed with and a sorter which would be nice to have but not a necessity at this time. The informal bids I have received to date are: Minolta: Base machine $3,566 Document feeder 1,119 Total $4,685 P,udget (3,800) Over budget $885 Ricoh: Base machine $3,764 Document feeder 1,052 Total $4,816 Budget (3,800) Over budget $1,016 Xerox: Base machine $3,445 Document feeder 1,045 Total $4,490 Budget (3,800) Over budget $690 Cannon: (Bid Police Dept. received)* Base machine $3,388 Document feeder 364 Total $3,752 Budget 3,800 Within budget $48 * Bid date was 9/11/85; I believe that there has been at least a 10% price increase since then. In addition to the purchase price of each machine I am looking at, the service con- tract offered, both price and coverage. I feel that this is a very important factor in calculating the actual cost per copy. 3- 61 2 2 - G leol 2- 4-34 /h 'Ch J 004&4/ 0,42,4 +Ak 9*j-- 9'WmAYL 56 C.'Mâ‚¬/4/ftu jb tptl 314 ~~1Â·Â¢ f~lt /~t,u~w.Ul o..U/u' Jc22~ -*v, ./l-~Â«A) ..Â·c) MUCG,1 h ta,rOL /1,9-11- 33 Â·kÂ» 0 Lkie ~~eft 16-74441#2&~-.6 14 1441* * .fAkka-ALA 0-~lk -.Aa..~L jlae-Â« Â»lt? do *t7)1.-ELL r~t- =01Â»Â«f 4 1,9 /1/ U .3=Â«~---/1-Â£1-72-,6/ 42/Â£1-Â«--- Â»4,4,/u-lati-- 3 1 6*k . . january 29, 1986 Estes Park Utilities Dept. P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colo. 80517 Please note name and telephone number change as indicated on payment card. Next billing should be addressed to: Surtec Co. Carl Price p.0. Box 4676 Estes Park, Colo. 80517 - Your new billing card is fine except that it' s information is---') / available to anyone who handles the card. We would much prefer the ~ 1~ card to come in an envelope or folded with address on the outside. ~/1 - Thanks, Carl Price l-640-/3022 1 6. --1,& 901.4 Â·m. I1 Lleâ€¢- f.. <1~14,1 (Lf -6 1 A M U lIu. 3Â»r nu; 6111,-Â·e <~ \ -Â¥1; c rM.P . \A., 310:r (134-i.n ~34, 1,e_(~*.Ar (9,6,9- r.ce, t~- CX i or-â‚¬L_-. li <3 Q n 0-% 4 dbo r- . 14 L>oll, b,â‚¬ prid All .-w G.AL.1f- ,Â¥to.1~b.fl. lk-Al \ (4-9 06Â·*.c,i~t.,Jlu, 06 1 ca,Â·,~1 6,0,1, 4Â»u 4-4- 94# 0aet? f)O*c- AÂ·14.. uto? 6,11-.1f10â€ž WCA 50 ty-o.r-\00&*,1 w 48 r'*L 'ID Ke<Â£&4&-r..01, 4 cÂ»'44\31/.. , 0 3 - 3 66>- 2203 . 0 -1 -7 f 71- L '' 261 4/ 30.6'627/Q-,-ZÂ£.49- 6 621 U~-60Â·J i r.-3 } â€ž21-2-4-7 C r-- 2- , / CUP j _*--Claf' ~~Â£342 40.2.2 62.2.4 1 / -541*fu--u , L--24,2- ri $-14 7/242 g-9,<2.~. iL:JU,i G 1 20- 169 >1-6~.2 't r-I j , .w.2.-71.,1,- ~ ULL.Â£1140-~ Cr' ' p ~ ~Connle M. Dilka 2022-44 Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80634 4 '0..4 '-1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK .. colo. PUC No. 2 . 21â€¢me Â©Â£ unlity ~ Twelfth Revised Sheet No._ 11 1 Cancel.9 Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 1 1 ELECTRIC RATES .. (Genenl Service Clas,Uicirion) GENERAL SERVICE SMALL Rate I : Carzpany Code (Râ€¢te Tide or Number) ., 43* APPLICABILITY Applicable in Estes Park service territory. - 4 AVAILABILITY This schedule is available for business lighting and small power loads of 35 RATE , kW maximum demands or less. All service will be supplied only through a single meter. This service is available at single or three-phase at voltages available at the customer service location. This schedule is not available for resale service. AIONTHLY RATE ,-431 r. Customer Charge $7.20 - 2 Energy Charge per kWh July, 1984 Purchased .06557 I E .D Power Rider Applied - MONTHLY MINIMUM BILL -'ti .... Net minimum meter charge per month $7.20 'c - "Â¢R PAYMENT ' Bills for electric service - are due and payable within ten (10) days , w subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. The foregoing schedule shall 4 be net where service is metered at secondary voltage of the Town's .. ..9.... distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the consumer shall receive a credit of two percent (296) of . â€ž~ the monthly bill,Â· . CONDITIONS OF SERVICE - Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and . Power Department general and specific Rules and Regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file and approved by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado. PURCHASED POWER RIDER This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the Purchased 00 #01.WRITE Power Rider Sheet No. 20. 49' e'.04 I ' 20 .- . 0 ! D 6 /U LL -- V. 2 1 4, 4- / , 3,/ e / -- r rfl , June 9, 1982 Advice Letter No 7,; rÂ»11_JU)-4.K>.1 Issue Data Sig,aturâ€¢ 01 I.suing Oiticar Deci,ion or Town Administrator ' July 10, 1982 Authoritv No_ - Effective T)nia f'444'11 VA i .1 - 'LJ.:$14 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 2301 M STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20037 â€¢202/775-8300 January 29, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: Preference Customers of Federal Power Marketing Agencies FROM: Alex Radin SUBJECT: Proposed "Privatization" of Federal Power Projects The Administration next week is expected to make public a proposal for "privatizing" federal power projects in order to help cut the deficit. According to national news reports, the scheme will be part of the fiscal year 1987 budget which will be presented to Congress on February 4. Such action could be devastating to publicly-owned utilities and rural electric cooperatives which rely on federal power sold under preference laws at cost-based rates for bulk power supply. In anticipation of the proposal, APPA has prepared the enclosed position paper which sets forth some of the problems presented by the "privatization" proposal. The paper, along with other pertinent background materials, is enclosed. We hope you will find it useful. Enclosures ffix ~WhLy -4 5. 492*31%11,63Â§94% &443471 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 2301 M STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20037 â€¢ 202/775-8300 January 27, 1986 ~ t , . EIGHT REASONS WHY THE FEDERAL POWER MARKETING AGENCIES SHOULD NOT BE SOLD r .. '11 The Reagan Administration is expected to propose that the five agencies which market hydroelectric power from federal dams be sold to private parties, and the purchase price applied to reduction of the federal budget deficit. "Privatization" of the federal power program is wrong-headed for at least - eight reasons: e Power dams pay their way and make money. e Power administrations help reduce the deficit. e Sellout proposal is driven by ideology, not business judgment. e Private owners could not do a better job. e "Privatization" would boost rates, and hurt the economy. e Scheme dumps assets that make money, and keeps those that do not. I Sellout would create a procedural nightmare. e Productivity and stability in utility industry would be undermined. The proposed sellout would put on the auction block the governmentis 130 hydroelectric plants which are vital sources of electricity -- at rates based on cost, not profit -- for many millions of households, businesses, industries, and farms in 34 states. Any possible short-term gain from "privatization" would not cut the long term deficit. In fact, the permanent loss of valuable, productive assets would cost the government billions of dollars in future revenues. (more) -2- 1. Power Dams Pay Their Way and Produce Revenue. The federal power agencies -- Bonneville Power Administration, Western Area Power Administration, Southwestern Power Administration, Southeastern Power Administration, and Alaska Power Administration -- are successful revenue-producing enterprises. Under the law, the agencies are obligated to return all costs of construction, operation, and maintainance for federal power production and transmission -- including principal and interest -- over a 50-year period. Of the total investment of some $15 billion, 20 percent has been repaid, plus an additional $5.3 billion in interest. Repayment is on schedule. Last year alone, the agencies returned to the government more than $1 billion in principal and interest. Power dams are more than paying their own way (see Table 1). Dams, turbines, transmission lines, and substations which are the working parts of this' system constitute valuable public property. They become more valuable each year as the federal investment is steadily retired, and the government moves closer to free-and-clear ownership. When they are paid for. they will continue to be revenue-producing assets. It would make no sense to "privatize" major money-making assets -- reliable, long-term sources of income -- to get a one-time payment on the deficit. 2. Proposal Driven by Ideology, Not Sound Business Judgment. Figures attributed to the Administration vastly understate the value of , these assets. For instance, the Wall Street Journal reports that the sell-out would produce $3 billion against the deficit. However, the investment in Bonneville alone -- including transmission, dams, and non-power related investment -- is $11.4 billion. The Grace Commission said Bonneville could be sold for $20 billion, and the regional newspaper The Oregonian recently (more) , -3- calculated that it is worth as much as $40 billion. To dispose of such valuable properties to private parties at prices far less than their real value would short change the public out of its investment, T 4/ t.1 .5,4 Â·04 and suggests that the proposal is driven by ideology -- "privatization" and "defederalization" -- not sound business judgment which would seek to preserve capital and ensure future income. Martin Feldstein, former chairman of the President Reagan's Council of Economic Advisors, noted in January that: J Fully one-quarter of the administration's total deficit reduction for 1987 is now scheduled to result from the sale of government assets, including government-owned utility plants and financial assets such as past loans to farmers and students. The administration claims that the Treasury receipts from these sales will reduce the deficit. At first glance this may seem legitimate. But in actuality these government asset sales would be no different from the sale of more government bonds. Although government accounting methods would make it look as if federal spending and receipts are in better balance, these asset sales would do nothing to lessen the burden of the deficit. That burden occurs because government borrowing to finance the deficit preempts savings that would otherwise be available for private investment in plant and equipment and in housing construction. The administration's proposed asset sales would preempt private savings every bit as much as a federal sale of new debt of the same value. 3. Power Administrations Help Reduce Deficit. The "giveaway" sale idea appears to be a single-shot proposition: the Administration apparently does not intend to invest the proceeds and use the income to retire the deficit, but simply to off-set federal borrowings in a single fiscal year by subtracting the sale price. In setting its sights on possible ways to make money to cut the deficit. the government is zeroing in on a target that does not drain revenue from the Treasury, but instead produces revenue for the government. Unlike most federal service programs, power projects are required by law to pay their own way. They do that -- and more. (more) .. -4- In addition to meeting current costs of operation and maintenance, federal power agencies are systematically retiring the old debt on power plant construction. Plus, the government annually collects substantial interest on t; 5 the debt. Thus, from the time of construction on through production and ' 'I operation, there is no power plant cost that the government does not fully recover. As the Washington Post noted in a December 24, 1985 editorial, selling the Bonneville Power Administration would mean a loss of revenues: Think what you please about the merits of such transfers, they are not answers to the budget problem. Assume even that the sales could be easily consummated, as this year's proposed sale of Conrail, for example, was not. They would lower the deficit only artificially and temporarily. The underlying gap between revenues and costs would be the same, would actually be a few hundred million dollars larger. The power administration serves to reduce the deficit; it makes a little money every year. If it didn't, you couldn't sell it. That is the ultimate perversity of this approach. 4. Private Owners Could Not Do a Better Job. Would the public gain because private parties could perfom these functions bettpr? No one claims that the federal power marketing agencies are not doing a good job. In fact, one of the reasons that they are considered saleable properties is that they produce low-cost power with effective delivery of the benefits. If sold at auction, the highest bidders probably would be private power companies. Nationwide statistics show that these companies have higher rates and are less efficient than publicly owned utilities. Federal figures show that each year since 1946, customers of private power companies have paid higher rates -- 42.5 percent higher for residential bills in 1983, the most recent comparison year available -- than those of public power systems. Public power systems have lower per kilowatt-hour expenses for production; distribution; accounting and operations; customer service, information, and sales; and administrative and general functions. Only (more) . -5- transmission expenses were higher. American consumers believe it is important to protect public power as a competitive force in the nation's utility industry, but sale of the federal L k. 4 I L . I power systems would seriously weaken public power. . 4., ' Â·Â· , . 1-. 1 In a national public opinion poll conducted last year for the American â€ž Public Power Association, 59 percent supported a continued mix of ownership in the electric utility industry; 30 percent favored public ownership for all utilities, and only 8 percent favored private ownership of all utilities. Sixty-seven percent believe publicly owned utilities are a competitive barrier against private monopoly in the utility industry. 4, ' 5. Sal e Would Boost Prices, Hurt Economy. One result of "privatizing" federal power dams is the certainty of much higher electric rates for many millions of consumers. The sale of hydro plants would trade the lower interest rates that were in effect when the projects were built for higher rates that prevail today. Unless the government plans to let the projects go at "bargain basement" prices, private buyers would have to borrow billions of dollars at today's interest rates, and the cost of refinancing would have to be passed on to the consumer, possibly doubling current utility bills in some areas. This of course would have far-reaching economic consequences on regions which receive a substantial portion of their electricity from the federal power program. Rising electric rates push consumers toward oil and gas, and imported energy -- contrary to national energy policy. Climbing costs of production coupled with falling market prices for some industries intensifies the impact of higher power bills. Pared payrolls and lost jobs mean less tax revenues and more unemployment benefits for governments at all levels, and could turn a residual regional recession in the Pacific Northwest into a long-term (more) . . -6- depression. "Privatization" of power projects could aid other economies -- but not 'r . ,..... # ours. The plan "could work in Hydro's favor", according to Chester Johnsons' chairman of British Columbia Hydro -- which already is selling $1 million worth It i , : './. :. I./..-'Â· I '. of Canadian power a day to the U.S. 6. Plan Would Dump Assets That Make Money, and Keep Those That Do Not The Federal government developed 130 dams on the nation's rivers to insure comprehensive development of a national resource, to provide public control over its use, and to advance economic growth. Rates based on cost, but not designed to make a profit, help keep energy costs down, make possible food and fiber in abundance at reasonable prices, reduce dependence on imported energy, and create greater economic opportunities with more jobs, income, and tax base. Multiple-purpose water projects supply not only electricity but also irrigation, flood control, navigation, municipal and industrial water supply, 1' wildlife enhancement, recreation, and salinity control. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation in the Interior Department, and the five federal power marketing agencies administer these purposes. No private party can step in and substitute for government in handling these functions without expecting a return and a profit. The obvious conclusion: the Administration is prepared to give away the "cash register" dams and keep non-revenue functions. In other words, in the name of "deficit reduction," assets which produce income would be dumped and those programs which do not would be retained. Would the government pay private parties to perform the non-profitable functions? Would dams be jointly operated? Who decides priorities -- the public interest or private pocketbooks? Would "cream skimming" be allowed -- sale of a specific dam's output or purchase of a particular segment of transmission line? Some federal power (more) -7- facilities are more valuable than others. Would private interests be allowed to purchase the choice parts and leave the less desirable for the government to continue operating? If this occurs, large integrated power systems composed of many projects organized for efficiency, designed to meet regional energy requirements, and matched to the operational needs of neighboring systems would be broken up piecemeal. The result would be higher prices for electricity, less reliability of service, endangered adequacy of supply, and residual government responsibility for a handful of scattered projects that nobody wanted to buy. 7. Sellout Would Create a Procedural Nightmare Sale of federal power projects would require reformation of thousands of contracts and scores of statutes to deal with existing sales agreements, planning processes, rate making procedures, and operational arrangements. While richly remunerative to lawyers, the issues pose potential harm to a variety of citizens and organizations. The legal questions raised include Constitutional issues involving impairment of contracts; outstanding obligations and lawsuits related to existing bilaterial and multi-party operating practices; Indian, Mexican, and Canadian treaty rights; statutory processes for review of planning, environmental protection, procurement approaches, administrative actions, and public meetings; and employee rights under civil service laws, policies, and retirement provisions. 8. Productivity, Stability Undermined. Federal power marketing agencies sell electricity to 500 local public power systems; 600 rural electric cooperatives; 135 units of local, state and federal government; and 60 private companies. Federal power projects have 32,600,000 kilowatts of installed generating capacity using 32,880 miles of transmission lines. Marketing is carried out by (more) , -. -8- 5,134 agency employees operating from 32 offices located in 16 States. The agencies had gross power revenues in 1984 of $3.4 billion, with Bonneville alone producing $2.7 billion. They earn revenues primarily from the sale of power at rates designed to offset all current power costs, and to make annual payments on the debt and interest. Rates are adjusted as required to ~ ensure that these obligations are met (see Table 2). In actual practice, the federal power program is a highly successful ~ essential public business which benefits not just the people it serves directly in 34 states, but consumers and taxpayers everywhere. Under arrangements which go all the way back to 1906, federal power is sold at cost-based rates with first right of purchase accorded by law to consumer-owned utilities that serve some 60 million Americans. .n Sale and distribution of federal power under present policies reaches deep into the nation's economy, according to an economic study conducted in 1985 for the American Public Power Association. In the 34 states where federal power is sold, a total of some 275,000 manufacturing, wholesale, retail, and service companies are served by public power systems or rural electric cooperatives which rely on federal power purchases for all or a portion of their supply of bulk power. These companies employ more than 3,000,000 people and contribute nearly $240 billion to the national economy. In addition, there are more than 1,300,000'farms in counties served by rural electric cooperatives which buy federal power. These farms produce commodities valued at $132 billion (see Table 3). The federal power program is part of the nation's infrastructure that includes the network of utility services that gives us transportation over public highways and water through public conveyance systems. It is a capital budget item -- not an income/expense entry. It is an investment which is fully recoverable with an effective service life in excess of 100 years. To sell it (more) -9- at a "fire sale" for short-term gain would be fiscal folly. "Selling off government assets doesn't do a single thing that we want to reduce the federal budget deficit," economist Alfred Kahn, former chairman of the U.S. Council on Wage and Price Stability and advisor to President Carter on inflation, asserted this month. "It doesn't relieve the pressure on interest rates caused by the government's recourse to the capital markets: it merely - 2 changes the instruments the government sells. And it certainly makes no change in the way in which we distribute our gross national productive effort between consumption and investment." Kahn declared: "The fundamental source of irrationality is, of course, not Gramm-Rudman-Hollings, but the failure of our federal budget accounts to distinguish spending in support of consumption from spending that adds up to our national assets." "Privatization" of federal power facilities also would erode the pattern of pluralism which has characterized the U.S. electric utility industry for over 100 years, and provided an effective form of "yardstick competition" which has helped keep rates down. The public first purchase right to- federal power is recognition that public resources -- including our rivers -- belong to the nation's people, and benefits from their use should be distributed directly to consumers where it is possible to do so -- at the lowest possible cost consistent with sound business principles. The 1985 APPA public opinion poll supported these marketing policies. By a margin of 70 percent to 25 percent respondents opted for cost-based rates over market-based rates for federal hydro power. Also, 73 percent agreed that "The government should not make a profit from water-power because this water belongs to all citizens." Sentiment on this point was strong in all regions of the country. A solid majority favored the status quo in distribution of federal power, with 63 percent wanting current laws left alone. (more) -10- The electric utility industry best serves the nation if diversity of ownership exists so as to encourage yardstick competition, prevent monopoly, and minimize or.eliminate competitive abuses. Local governmental and cooperative utilities are generally smaller than .> privately-owned companies, and their reliance on purchasing power from private companies should be reduced by making available to them excess power from federal projects. :~7 1 9 - i -le Because transmission is the key to control of electricity, federal power lines are a key element in protecting against "bottleneck boycotts" which allow private parties to choke off competition in bulk power supply. In the Bonneville service area, BPA is responsible for 80 percent of the region's high voltage grid and has a statutory duty to supply service to all indigenous utilities. To turn this four-state electrical highway system over to ~ -., ~ profit-maximizing private utilities would encourage anti-competitive business practices and would be a gross disservice to all utility customers. It would be fiscally irresponsible to turn the federal power program over to private interests, and to penalize millions of consumers by driving up rates. It is a program -- valued for its assets, for the continuing revenue it produces, and for the irreplaceable services it provides -- that has benefited the American people for nearly a century -- and can continue to do so. American Public Power Association 2301 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 202/775-8300 Contact: Gordon Roberts Deborah Sliz TABLE 1 FEDERAL INVESTMENT AND INTEREST PAYMENTS OF POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS (through FY1985) ..''ll. I Cumulative â€ž 1.4,1 Actual 1985 37 : . I . AN " *Â·Atd Power , 10: . 4 .... Repayable 1 4 Administration Investment Repaid Repaid Interest (millions of dollars) Western Area 4,148 1,760 233 136 Bonneville 8,702 866 226 375 Southeastern 1,300 325 27 29 Southwestern 920 102 40 18 Alaska 128* 17* 1* 3* Total 15,198, 3,070 527 561** * 1984 (1985 not yet available) ** Including 1985 payments, cumul ative interest payments by the five PMA' s total $5.3 billion, excluding the unavailable 1985 APA payments. Source: Department of Energy January 1986 .. TABLE 2 1984 REVENUES AND POWER SALES OF POWER MARKETING AGENCIES Gross Power Wholesale Revenue Sold(kWh) Purchasers Offices Employees $(millions) 8PA 2,700 120,763,610,000 188 12 3,500 WAPA 540.7 49,501,975,025 562 11 1,379 SEPA 80.6 7,195,492,909 224 1 38 SWPA 100.5 4,715,870,000 95 5 179 APA 6.8 347,569,871 6 3 38 Total $3,428.6 182,524,517,805 kWh 1,075 32* 5,134 *In 16 states (not including Washington, D.C.) Source: Department of Energy FY 1984 Annual Reports . TA8LE 3 MANUFACTURING, WHOLESALE. RETAIL 4 SERVICE FIRMS SERVED J.V..: SY CONSUMER-OWNED UTILITIES THAT PURCHASE FEDERAL POWER Manufacturing Firms Employees Sales Revenue Wholesale Firms Employees Value Added $(000) WAPA 15,739 610,900 17,634,600 WAPA 18,865 215,124 - 77,396,152 BPA 4,822 191,800 6,574,000 BPA 5,006 57,846 19.343.531 SEPA 2,305 156,700 3,581,300 SEPA 2,662 25,627 7,418,938 SWPA 913 55,800 1,349,200 SWPA 1,543 15,731 4,687,631 APA 204 3,400 182.600 APA 479 5,724 2.011.299 - - -1~ --.I- I -Ill Total 23,983 1,018,600 29,321,700 Total 28,555 320,052 110,857,551 Service , Retail Firms Employees Sales Revenue Firms Employees Sales Revenue $(000) 1(000) WAPA 65,478 600,944 26,003,317 WAPA 82,382 623,464 44,675,375 BPA 16,124 129,547 4,964,340 BPA 23.395 170,096 12,172,560 SEPA 8,308 56,319 1,767,805 SEPA 13,200 91,684 6,265,148 5WPA 4,241 27,749 898,071 SWPA 7,935 55,673 4,023,769 APA 1,761 15,483 850.424 APA -0- -0- -0- Total 95,912 830,042 34,483,957 - - Total 126,912 940,917 67,136,852 FARMS IN COUNTIES SERVED BY RURAL COOPERATIVES WHICH PURCHASE FEDERAL POWER Market Value of Total Number Products Sold $(000) WAPA 403,529 33,944,225 BPA 98,476 6,854,824 SEPA 329,325 13,253,533 SWPA 491,976 18,773,879 APA 372 8,538 Total 1,323,678 132,834,999 Source: John W. Wilson & Associates Washington, D.C. January, 1986 ' - :*53tÂ»,3& */1748:* .Â£52*60:9:ld.19269:0 3*-Â·*A, 4.1<91**41%Â·4 AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION ru Â»454 4..42 .:r- wdÂ· Â·fk. 01,11 - esÂ¥?Pk., e.6.-4, 2301 M STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20037â€¢ 202/775-8300 QUESTIONS OFTEN ASKED ABOUT THE FEDERAL POWER PROGRAM Q. Why should electricity from federal dams be subsidized? A. There is no subsidy. All costs of construction, production, operation and maintenance are fully repaid -- plus interest -- to the U.S. Treasury. These obligations are met through rates paid by people who use federal power -- not by general taxpayers. Q. Why then are rates for federal hydropower relatively low compared to national averages, and interest charged at rates below the current cost of borrowing? A. It costs far less to generate electricity from falling water than from other means of generation because the resource is clean, free, renewable, and inflation proof. This is the case whether hydropower plants are built by the U.S. government or by private power companies. Interest rates are lower than today's rates because they were set decades ago when the dams were authorized and built and when the cost of financing was far less. Q. Why shouldn't federal power users do their part to reduce the deficit? A. They already do. In addition to paying rates that cover current costs of operation, they systematically retire the debt on power plant construction, and send substantial interest_ to the Treasury. Of the total federal investment in power ($14.8 billion), $3 billion has been repaid, plus $5.3 billion in interest. Federal power not only pays its own way, the program also produces revenues that finance other important government functions, such as irrigation, salinity control, and water augmentation. Q. Why should a small segment of society -- people who happen to be served by public, consumer-owned utilities -- benefit from the nation's water resources? A. Regions and consumers served by federal power are not small. Federal power is sold to nearly 1,100 public power systems and cooperatives in 34 states which serve some 60 million consumers. When the requirements of consumer-owned utilities have been met, federal power agencies sell electricity directly to private power companies and to energy-intensive industries, such as aluminum plants in the Northwest. Also, private utilities hold rent-free leases to hundreds of hydro facilities on the nation's waterways. The benefits of the federal power program reach into every part of the United States by helping to keep energy costs as low as possible and by promoting diversity and competition in thi; utility industry. (over) -2- Q. Why shouldn't the U.S. increase rates and make a profit on hydropower? A. The government is not in business to profit from public service. Federal power is sold like all electricity in the United States -- at rates based on the actual cost of production. The only exception to this rigid rule is that private power companies are allowed a reasonable, regulated profit above cost. If the government deviates from cost-based rates, it would set a precedent for permitting arbitrary rate hikes by consumer-owned and private utilities alike. The government's responsibility to consumers is to keep the nation's energy costs as low as possible -- not to set the pace for higher rates. Q. Why does the law give consumer-owned utilities first purchase rights to federal hydropower? A. The public first right to federal hydropower ensures diversity and competition in the electric utility industry by supplying local, community-owned utilities with a reliable source of power. Competition between public and private utilties is a proven force which helps to restrain cost, improve service, and protect consumers. Congress and the courts have long recognized that competition in the utility industry, by guarding against total monopoly, benefits all consumers -- those served by private power companies as well as those served by public power systems. ### -- /. -t. I ,~L 0 - . , . - ..0..3. - .V *14 -,-7-- - ... U ./-22 , .0 \. '' 1. I L. I 'r $ 0 I . /4 - i ) l . 0 0 / I , I./ 1 .-L ..5 Z O. : 0 0 - ./ - 1 . t + 6 .0 . - 0 < I - - . - . ' W i 6 z \ , 29-2 . Z w _ % (,f) 1- Ova,O 0 WIZ - Z . .- - 009 . - 4 - - , add'SS#S <05 42 - 1 8 C r. 2 .. 1 - 6 2 1 - : U, 9 , 4 - - 0 2 3 - 1 1 4 -; 11. ,$ â‚¬ ' \ 1 . 0 - . 4. - p C I ; 1 1 I un . 1 0 r _ tn _ 1 . - , 1 -1 - ... 3 1 3 F r Z 0 -4 i. i a lot r X . 2 - 3 If 1. 1 1 . 1 W W 0 . 0 . 1 -ir Z i . z 1 0--I $ C 1 1101 U . U 1-l- 2 1 0 . 2 1 1 1 - 1 W â‚¬ 2 2 1 i o 0 CL W 2 2 1 2 O L Z I - 0 C - 4 . = 4 -- / 0 -- 2 AL , .--1 1 -0 - -- I f-L: /- f 0. f , / O I . -m . k / .. , - 0 . F - 0 L ca f 1 1 F 1 IONN. 6 3 , NNSYLVANIA f 'VIRG#:41-% NORTH CAROLINA 81005 1 H 1 1OH V ) \ UO!11)JISIUIUIPV ' Â¥194039 ministration uolionsiullupv Je Welgoeuino inistration uo!1049!UlltlpvieMOd uie,SeAA411109 Vd ILLINOIS 4. WISCONSIN f , 5Â¥SNV*hIV MISSOURI MIN SOI A 1 r Â· POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS . Power Marketing Administrations are federal agencies created by Congress to sell hydroelectric power generated at 130 dams and power plants operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers. Federal power projects have 32,600,000 kilowatts of installed generating capacity and use 32,880 miles of high voltage transmission lines. In 1984, the PMA's had gross revenues totaling more than $3.4 billion. Federal power is marketed in 34 states, primarily to publicly-owned utilities and rural electric cooperatives -- but also to industry and private power companies. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION -- Created in 1937, BPA serves Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana. BPA has 14,100 miles of transmission lines, and generates power from 30 hydroelectric facilities. BPA supplies about 65 percent of the electric energy consumed in the Northwest -- to 188 wholesale purchasers -- and also is responsible for conservation, renewable resource development, and fish and wildlife enhancement. WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION -- Established 1977, WAPA sells power from 49 plants to 562-*Ahasers in 15 states. WAPA uses 16,120 miles of transmission lines. SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION -- SWPA, established in 1943, markets electric power in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri. SWPA power is generated at 23 hydro plants, which is transmitted over 1,660 miles of lines, and serves 95 purchasers. SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION -- Created in 1950, SEPA sells power from 22 plants to 224 purchasers in 10 states. The agency operates no transmission lines. ALASKA POWER ADMINISTRATION -- The Alaska Power Administration was established in 1967, and markets power from two hydro projects. It has about 1,000 miles of transmission lines. *** In the 34 states, the following breakdown shows the number of public power systems and rural cooperatives in each state which purchase electricity from the Power Marketing Administration: Alabama 53 Missouri 16 Alaska 4 Montana 10 Arizona 29 Nebraska 57 Arkansas 8 Nevada 4 California 54 New Mexico 4 Colorado 22 North Carolina 31 Florida 8 North Dakota 17 Georgia 93 Oklahoma 18 Idaho 23 Oregon 32' Illinois 1 South Carolina 17 Indiana 1 South Dakota 40 Iowa 50 Tennessee 82 Kansas 6 Texas 6 Kentucky 20 Utah 38 Louisiana 5 Virginia 13 Minnesota 53 Washington 55 Mississippi 34 Wyoming 14 National Opinion Poll Gives Public Power High Mar ks by MADALYN CAFRUNY contributing editor, PUBLIC POWER, and APPA public information director A MAJORITY OF U.S. consumers believe pub- comes down heavily on the side of public Also, 73 percent agreed that "The govern- lic power is more concerned about the envi- power in every dominant measure tested. ment should not make a profit from water- ronment, offers lower rates, allows more The American people support public power power because this water belongs to all citi- control over utility operations, and has bet- principles. They strongly favor a competi- zens." Sentiment on this point was strong in ter service than private power companies. tive, diverse electric utility industry. They all regions of the country. A solid majority These are some of the findings of a na- want public water resources used for non- favored the status quo in distribution of fed- tional public opinion poll commissioned by profit, public purposes, and oppose arbitrary eral power, with 63 percent wanting current the American Public Power Association and increases in federal power prices. laws left alone. conducted in March and April.* The poll tested support for Office of Man- The objectives of the study were to deter- Pluralism, Competition Supported agement and Budget Director David Stock- mine basic attitudes about electric utilities, Six out of every 10 respondents were aware rnan's proposal to charge today's interest measure knowledge of the nation's current of the pluralistic nature of the electric utility rates for old outstanding debt on federal electric utility structure, assess perceived industry, with public, cooperative and pri- projects. The vast majority of those partici- differences between public and private vately owned systems, and 59 percent think pating in the poll, 86 percent, agreed with power and test awareness and opinion ab,but it is best for the country to continue to have public power's position that the federal the preference clause and cost-based vs. such a mix. Nearly one-third, 30 percent, loans should be repaid at their original inter- market-based rates for federal hydroelectric favored public ownership for all utilities; est rate. power. only 8 percent favored private ownership for While only 14 percent of those polled The poll shows that the public at large all utilities. were aware of the preference laws allowing The public believes local ownership of publicly owned electric utilities first right to electric utilities plays a strong competitive federally generated hydroelectric power, 57 role in the electric utility industry. Sixty- percent supported the policy when told *This was APPA'S first national public seven percent of the respondents agreed about it. Only 21 percent opposed it, and the opinion poll. It was designed and conducted wi th the statement that "if publicly owned remaining 22 percent had no opinion. by Hamilton & Sta# of Bethesda, Md., and utilities did not exist, then the privately ~- funded by APPRS Campaign to Preserve owned, for-profit utilities would have a mo- ublic vs. Private Benefits Preference and COSI-Based Rates. This telephone survey of 1,300 U.S. adults nopoly over the utility industry and they When asked, "Which type of system do you had two parts: a nationwide random sample could charge whatever they wanted." By believe would be more concerned about the of 800 adults and a separate sample of 500 similar percentages, 68 to 27, respondents environment-public or private?" 70 per- public power customers randomly selected endorsed the view that publicly owned utili. cent - of the respondents opted for public from all public power customers. The nation- ties provide a standard of competition by P0wer. wide sample had a maximum sampling error which to measure the quality and cost of When asked which type of system would of plus or minus 3 percent the public power services provided by private power compa. have lower rates, a solid majority, 65 per- sample had a maximum sampling error Of nies. They rejected, 54 percent to 39 per- cent, again chose public power over private plus or minus 6.5 percent. Data were weighted to rejlect the correct consistency of cent, the view that consumers always get a power. respondents by service type and region. The fair rate because private power companies Hal f of the respondents also believed pub- sample also reflected census data for adult are regulated. lie power would provide better overall ser- vice; only 37 percent thought private power Americans over the age of 18 by race. age' Cost-Based Pricing Favored companies would provide the best service. and sex. Copies of thepublic opinion pollare avail- By a margin of 70 percent to 25 percent, By a more than two-to-one majority, 66 able from Deborah Sliz, APPA'S preference respondents opted for cost-based rates over percent of the respondents agreed that campaign coordinator. market-based rates for federal hydro power. -publicly owned utilities are better than pri- Reprinted from July/August, 1985 issue of PUBLIC POWER, official publication of 31 the American Public Power Association. 2301 M St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037 '*f34' , 6 vately owned ones because the consumers dents expressed the view that private power "well run and efficient," while 38 percent have a greater say in how the utility is run." would have "less bureaucracy and waste." rated their utility "poorly run with a lot of The poll also revealed two misconceptions and 61 percent said private power would be money wasted." People served by a public about public power-apparently demon- more efficient. power system were slightly less likely than strating in both instances the public's gen- those served by a private company to say eral negative feelings toward government Opinions Mixed on Service their electric utilities were poorly run. bureaucracy and bigness. Although a major- Respondents had mixed opinions about elec- Only 25 percent of the respondents said ity of public power systems serve communi- tric utilities in general. they have "a lot" or "some" control over ties with populations of 10,000 or less, 58 First, 87 percent gave the electric utility their electricity rates. Persons served by pri- percent thought publicly owned systems that serves them positive ratings: only 12 vate utilities were more likely to say they would be larger than private power compa- percent rated the utility negatively. There had no control. These diverging views on nies. Also, despite statistics year after year were no basic differences in attitude be- control were strong in the Northwest. Sev- by the Department of Energy showing that tween public and private power customers. enty percent of the Northwest respondents public power systems have significantly However, respondents were split on served by private utilities, and 37 percent of lower management and operating costs than whether their utilities were well- or poorly those served by public power, said they had private companies. 52 percent of the respon- run. Forty-four percent said their utility was no control over rates. f#lk I' 'Â·19 Which is best for the U.S.? Do you favor cost-based rates? ' i- 2 ' / 59% 70% Yes Both public and ~ \ private utilities 11 .,~ Don't know i. ~ 1 i VIVAI private utilities Don't know Do you think federal dam debt should be repaid Do you favor public "first right" policy? at the original interest rate, or at today's interest rate? 1 \ 86% i ....................................................... , Original rate - . w.- 4 57% Yes ~ Immt. 2/ E- M- / -06 - ~ Today s rate No Opinion