The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Light and Power 1985-04-04. LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE APRIL 4, 1985 AGENDA 1, FALL RIVER HYDRO PLANT 2, VEHICLE BIDS A, COMPRESSOR TRUCK - 1984 B TWO I T TRUCKS REPORTS: A. PRPA B. SEMINAR PROPOSALS Ge=r:APPA-- RECEIVED MAR 1 9 1685 dos lown of Estes Park Town Administrator COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF March 18, 1985 John P. Byrne. Director Division of Disaster PUBLIC SAFETY Emergency Services Mr. Dale Hill Town Manager Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Mr. Hill: Forward herewith for your information and action, is a copy of correspondence recently received from FEMA Region VIII, concerning the Fall River Hydro Plant. At this point in time, it appears the only two options open are either to rebuild the reservoir and plant, or to take flexible funding. I'm sorry this issue has taken so long to get to this point, but whenever you break new ground in one of these programs you never know were it will land. I wouldn't be overly concerned with the 12 April deadline, it was established to get the project back on track. I'm presently in the process of reviewing in detail all of the Summaries of Documentation submitted by the Town and writing up those in which there are costs overruns or other questions to be resolved. I hope to have something in writing prior to the end of the month, so that any differences can be resolved with FEMA, prior to a final audit. I am prepared to Richard O Lamm GOVERNOR discuss the contents of FEMA's letter with you and provide what ever assistance I can in resolving this issue. William L Koleszar EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Colorado State Please let me know if I can be of help to you. Patrol Colorado eureau Sincerely, of Investigatior, Colorado Law Entorcemenl Training Academy EPAC.a.J a.LlÂ« Division 01 Leonard A. Boulas Criminal Justice Governor's Authorized Representative Division or Disaster FEMA-665-DR Emergency Services Division of F,fe Safety LAB/neo Enclosures: FEMA Region VIII 11 i Ltr. dated 12 March 1985 /'SFEct~ 4 1 **,@3~ 8 L3 Ejille 31 1 ~ Camp George West ~ ii ~21 2 ,-hwoz M 04Â£/MEd,53 - J Golden, Colorado 80401 3 0006>6=JE (303) 279-2511 E- 4*1111111'*; =ll 4 . Â«Y MA . cs--///2: /5<fe-Â«b\01 Federal Emergency Management Agencyl . .Es !=: 6.'IllÂ·P; 141 Region VIII Denver Federal Center P.O. Box 25267 .o 23 9 . DI' 'r:' , Ill.. ; J U c.0 I 6 :)i Denver, CO 80225-0267 March 12, 1985 Mr. Leonard Boulas Governor's Authorized Representative Division of Disaster Emergency Services EOC, Camp George West Golden, Colorado 80401 Dear Mr. Boulas In recent conversations with FEMA's Office of General Counsel and Public Assistance personnel at the National Office, the various options regarding the Fall River Hydro Plant were explored. It has been determined that in order to restore a pre-disaster public service, PL 93-288 allows for the repair or replacement of public facilities only. Non-construction alternatives such as the proposed replacement of lost hydrogeneration with power obtained from the Western Area Power Administration are ineligible. The previous lengthy delays and uncertainties regarding the project create the necessity for immediate actions on other options. It is now essential that the Town of Estes Park reach a final decision on reconstructing the facility via a categorical grant, or requesting the flexible funding alternative from FEMA. To this end, the Town must determine which option of those previously discussed is now acceptable. Please notify FEMA by April 12, 1985 of the Town's decision. 43211- ~-~Alton D. Cook Regional Director TOWN OF ESTES PARK FEMA GRANT FUNDING OPTIONS FEBRUARY 13, 1985 "IDEAL CASE REBUILD ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL CASCADE DAM CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL FLOOD EXPENDITURES TO DATE: Emergency services, debris removal & temporary repairs $354,835 $354,835 FEMA cost sharing percentage x .75 x .75 Emergency costs to be reimbursed by FEMA $266,126 $266,126 - Permanent repairs to Town property damaged in flood 269,355 269,355 FEMA cost sharing percentage - x .75 x.675 Permanent repair costs to be reimbursed by FEMA 202,016 181,814 FEMA GRANTS FOR ACTUAL EXPENDITURES: 468,142 447,940 FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: Cascade Dam Funding: Rebuild Cascade Dam, power plant & penstock for Fall River Water Treatment Plant (negotiable amt.) 1,437,000 FEMA cost sharing percentage x .75 Costs of rebuilding dam & penstock to be reimbursed by_FEMA 1,977,750 ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION Total amount available for other projects: 1,437,000 FEMA cost sharing percentage x.675 Costs of alternative capital construction projects to be reimbursed by FEMA 969,975 FEMA GRANTS FOR FUTURE CAPITAL --- EXPENDITURES: 1,077,750 969,975 TOTAL FEMA GRANTS PORTION: 1,545,892 1,417,915 TOTAL TOWN'S PORTION: 515,298 643,275 TOTAL PROJECTS 2,061,190 2,061,190 Other projects to be considered: Pedestrian bridge near hydro plant 16,960 16,960 x .75 x.675 12,720 11,448 Balance of Fall'River Picnic Grounds 12,041 12,041 x .75 x.675 9,031 8,128 Balance of Garage & outbuildings ' at hydro plant 7,109 7,109 x .75 x.675 $5,332 $4,799 Possibility of separate DSR for supplying water to Fall River Water Treatment Plant (included in (included in above totals) above totals) Â¥1 - &411- L -0- 1 r ~4 4Â· 7 1342;i YÂ·*10*YÂ·; e -lf -1 fi Q-&0~- 2. '93-45 J 1 -9 '1 , 1 4. ..0 , 4. A-. : T.f'*r.~Â·r~.:t.*. 0:8.Â·6;~.4.3, >:.fi~{.~ i~463~::41*[:.1 :5 :fl~ 7Â»>{:~.,kr... ~ ....%; 1,1 >32:'.-%...lit:kfi2 I - .*I P.O. BOX 676 14'AUTOMA, WISCONSIN 54982 February 25, 1985 Mr. Robert Dekker Town of Estes Park Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 RE: 01ympus Dam Project #8463-000 Dear Bob: Please find enclosed copies of letters from the United States Department of Interior and the Division of Wildlife which request their respective Department's notification following issuance of a preliminary permit for the project. Essentially, these Departments want to know what specific developments and operational plans of such facility will be and as definite planning is done toward the construction of a project, these Agencies should be notified in accordance with overall site planning and operational plans. I do not see, from reading the letters, that there are any difficult requirements for you to meet so far, and this is one reason that the project looked good in the beginning, that being the ultimate simplicity of the project and the small amount of actual existing facility which the project alters. The comment date has now passed and I will be anxious to hear from you regarding your receipt or indication of any letters of intent or other competing applications. For simplicity's sake, we'll hope that we have none, but- we shall be prepared to review such if they come in. Please let us know if you have any questions on these proceedings as we progress through the comment period. Also, Bob, I have enclosed the Button Rock study that you lent us recently. We do appreciate you letting us use this file as it has helped us gain some useful information about the project. We do intend on approaching the City of Longmont and inquiring as to the potential lease/development of this project by a firm such as ours. We are also keeping - SPECIALISTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-HEAD HYDROELECTRIC POWER - - NORTHAMERICAN HYDRO INC. - Mr. Robert Dekker February 25, 1985 Page 2 a close "ear to the ground" for developments in the state- funded St. Vrain study which is now ongoing. 0 I am discussing with my partners the economic possibilities at the Cascade/Fall River Hydro for NAH to lease, rehabilitate, and operate long-term/and maintain the hydroelectric generating project. We want to discuss this idea with the Town in further ~etail as it initially looks interesting to us. We are looking forward to seeing you soon. Please let me know if there are any questions regarding the Olympus Dam project or the Cascade project. Sincerely, NORTH AMERICAN HYDRO, INC. W JU &) -14*4 William D. Harris / WDH:dmm Enc. - Division of Wildlife - Hodgson U.S. Department of Interior - Stewart Button Rock Feasibility Study - CH2M Hill ) Â¥N '' 142* .2- Â·21'MIL' I. I I ,-2.,16 r: ,: >Â¢4> 94.9Â».194:*3Ulf2*f#.iâ‚¬Z~ - .Â· .-~â€¢27~ - r 4,2,~' - A 74 - Â£40 .4 . - 11- 4-:.pr.MillÂ·.~t.f>'XMA&.eÂ£61633<*,rw,frkjA146*ag/. 1 Â·.., .xeÂ«.9 Â·41,: 04. Â·Â· . 3-1~9 -:-9*##M .. . .- ..; L. .:3'.-:.I- .>,4,5.171,4.FF/224 2+4.14+KSmfraitg'X?*4811&Â£ 1+1.4., /03:~ ..:aN...33,1.Â·44%*R"742~ A RO. BOX676 7-Â»77790 4 WAUTOMA, WISCONSIN 54982 January 25, 1985 Mr. Robert Dekker Town of Estes Park Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Bob: I appreciated the opportunity to visit with you recently in Estes Park regarding the Cascade/Fall River Project and the Olympus Dam Project. North American Hydro will keep you informed of the Town's status on the Olympus Dam preliminary permit as information becomes available to us regarding this matter. As I mentioned to you, the comment date is February 8th. Please find enclosed a copy of the first page of the permit on which I have highlighted the important dates and number of days to remember. We are reviewing the Buttonrock feasibility study which you sent and plan to return it soon to your office. We sure appreciate this favor, allowing us to look at this report. The information in it is most helpful. Regarding the Cascade/Fall River Project, Bob, I think the best thing you can do at this time is simply to assess the Town's position on the project in the best way you can and await comments from the Park Service. As they are preparing to determine the amount they are to offer you for the sale of this project, you will then have to prepare equations such that you can plug this number in and be able to weigh the net benefit of doing the plant yourself, not doing - SPECIALISTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-HEAD HYDROELECTRIC POWER - - NORTH*MERIC/IN HYDRO INC. - Mr. Robert Dekker January 25, 1985 Page 2 the hydro, not reconstructingany plant, or lastly, pursuing the development with and through a private developer such as North American Hydro, pursuant to our recent conversation. If we can be of any help to you, please don't hesitate to call. We have offered many leases in similar circumstances, typically to counties and municipalities, on non-operating plants and would be able to help you with the details should you need information. As I told you, North American Hydro will again be looking at the cost figures on Cascade/Fall River in terms of its ultimate long term rehabilitation and operational feasibility with our company. -As-I-ment'fon-e'dz:rci-you-dur-itng- ourE recenE1-1 I meetyrig 4 Bbb'>TI-tiEri'6ve-thaâ‚¬zirersri' mpvr't-5rft-93[iF5-hE:- I tÂ·own=to - retalinuwaite r.Zr,1,9.h,tsiandlea~tre-r=-tak'efo-utri R:**kE:=922*15~~~~Â· are-de-~comm :i-ss'ibTrfe-d-1by ps-Fle"SZ'M*rer*nd 9MWirrit Would ~ 13 eiveÂ·ryzd i:f flic-6175-to-r etnsiTNE,ftil,Eb pe-ralt"imiZag~31Â¥fti'n â‚¬Raff (fitiÂ¥1;9~#'--- - U Ehe-mosckd*riect,Fand=s i'mplp-s/t."--~...a-.'.,~...e-,",~.r~ irittwilic-h:Ztdp pu.r.su'eÂ¥Fredeveitopment=and=yoperation=oÂ·f=the=Ch'scade/Fa 1 1 =4 9 iRIi.ve'r=Hytitep'lanâ‚¬Ei&9-fd,FÂ¥-th-&7EEkn --Eb -i-rDMIFEEEhbin-s*fies, [2%-anginve-s'â‚¬673*glfkper-ator 7--* IÂ·f=th-istNE'ems:no:tÂ·zto:r~Bis ptÂ·& u stb'be7rwhi.â‚¬h-i-t-rmay-,no't=be-7=I=~-c-6'm-a 20'rd'78W~Efrart .- (i Wte-v:er.y-AYEiEs*51:eciTATAH-wÂ·i-121Â·..assfsâ‚¬Eyb'uzzthÂ·Afig ti'-:CEs ,ppiten't'i.aâ€¢Â»invotvement-Â·in-.th-e- retiNI-i-A,tation and p pe'ratri'o rfrd'f=râ‚¬-he:CTsecad'â‚¬ZFy.11'Ri vers#Pant**31*4-Br 1Â¢1~ - Q- - -h~ / 1671gati-6 DITIA'tias is-as-a L-esst-e --Ef * the- f ac i 1 fiy23 We are looking forward to visiting with you again soon. Take care. Sincerely, NORTH AMERICAN HYDRO, INC. , Wauto. WIUWA 0 Bill Harris WDH:dmm Enc. - Copy of FERC Preliminary Permit 1., ~ 4~9;y TOWN oF ESTES PARK Light and Power Department Robert L. Dekker C.4 1 - yffl Director 42.i> 4 940 F -*216'â€¢ <4 1, Â¥ 9 j -Â·bl /7 - ... 42: '.52> 2 .042:4 :,i'.6.1,4 -442- / 'r~t:,f~~~.1-~\%~A~.,4 --~f~~~~Â¥t~,I.Â·~~- ' 1-Â·204 j'Li 31* 2â‚¬-44 -4.z Estes Park, Colorado 80517 August<23, 1984 Mr. Dale Hill Town Administrator TOWN OF ESTES PARK Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Dale: It appears we may be close to having enough information on our hydro plant and Cascade Dam for the Town Council to make a decision on replacing these facilities. Rebuilding the entire system as nearly as possible to the way it existed prior to the 1982 flood would result in 75% FEMA and 25% Town financing. This is "cut and dried" and the resulting costs are easily definable. In the event a diversion structure is built, as the supplemental feasibility study indicates would be most cost effective, (or perhaps no replacement facilities are constructed at all) we are faced with the flexible funding approach. Assuming we decide to build the diversion structure with the associated flexible funding, Monte Vavra's figures show we would have $366,817 in additional funds from FEMA, as their 67%% participation, to apply to other approved capital projects. This amount could vary, depending on the actual amount used as a base figure for replacing the original facilities in kind. There are many capital projects that the Light and Power Department can develop that would improve our system, increase reliability, and be beneficial to our entire customer base. A list of these is attached. The point P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-3331 Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Mr. Dale Hill August 23, 1984 Page 2 I want to impart and one we can easily defend and justify, is that this money which is generated in the Light and Power Department should stay in this department! Our customers who live in an area extending from Allenspark to Glen Haven should be the ones to gain from these funds. Other entities apparently are eyeing this potential source of funds. The special uses they have in mind would, for the most part, serve only a relatively @mall area within our town limits. Our department always has tried to operate efficiently. We have had to develop our own programs, justify our actions, and answer forÂ·any mistakes. When possible and legal, with the strict constraints placed on us, our department has helped supplement financing in many of the Town's operations in the past. I am sure this will continue. However, now that there is a probability of having some money that could be used for some good effective department projects, it does not seem prudent, based on sound business practice, or morally appropriate for this money to be "skimmed" from the department. I believe if projects or developments are proposed by other departments or agencies, these entities should obtain their own financing through any legitimate means available other than taking from the Light and Power Department. This is the very sort of thing that could cause us to be placed back under Colorado Public Utilities Commission jurisdiction. The potential financial setback from that scenario could many times surpass the contribution we may receive from FEMA. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK Light and Power Department lfÂ« / Robert L. Dekker Director RLD:ca Attachment CC: Monte Vavra CAPITAL PROJECTS 1984 & 1985 In Order of Priority (If Funding Becomes Available) 1. 9.8 MVA Power Transformer installed at Mary's Lake Substation. . $165,000 Justification: If a catastrophic situation (such as a direct lightning strike experienced by a Colorado R.E.A. the week of August 13, 1984) damaged either transformer at our Estes Sub- station, it would severely strain our system to transfer the load to the remaining transformers. If the transmission line serving our Estes Sub- station went out of service, the one existing transformer at Mary's Lake could not handle the entire system load. 2. Install switchgear feeders and related equipment at Mary's Lake Substation. $120,000 Justification: To accommodate a second power transformer and to be able to distribute electrical loads properly, these additional facilities are necessary. 3. Install 75 KVA hydro generating unit at Olympus Dam. $175,000 Justification: This project has been investi- gated and found to be cost effective. Also, we must continue to demonstrate our willingness to develop renewable energy sources and actively support energy conservation to insure retaining our full allotment of federal power. 4. Build new three-phase line from Mary's Lake to YMCA and Windcliff area. $105,000 Justification: Development in Windcliff Sub- division and proposed development on Tunnel Road will add considerable electric load to a line already at near maximum capacity. Rebuilding the existing line would be costly and not as reliable as a new line paralleling the federal government's transmission line to that area. I ./ 5. Build new rerouted three-ph,ase line from Cheley Camp to Wind River. $115,500 Justification: A new surge of development in three specific areas on our South line makes it necessary to increase electrical capacity and reliability. The existing line crosses through approximately two miles of property inaccessible by vehicle. A new.line would be constructed in a location where maintenance would not be such a problem. 6. New 8,000 Sq. ft. service building constructed in vicinity of land fill area. $265,000 Justification: The present service building is located on the land fill. The entire yard around the building settles considerably every year. This necessitates rebuilding the garage approaches and raising the asphalt next to the dock on a yearly basis. Even then drainage cannot be maintained. All utilities have been sheared off at one time or another from this settling. The sewer system is presenting a serious problem. The County Health Department has ordered us to put in a sealed vault and have it pumped rather than use the leach field. This building was built when energy costs were relatively low so insulation levels are not high, thus creating high heating bills. All in all, a new building appears to be the most cost effective way to solve all of these problems. 7. Load management study and resulting installation of control system. $80,000 Justification: Our present wholesale capacity charge is $10.40 per kilowatt. This will increase in the future. Any reduction in our system peak load has a great effect on our wholesale costs. The many electric hot water heaters in our system, at 4.5 kilowatts each, present a potential for peak load reduction. This is done with automated signaling devices that turn off these hot water heaters during system peaks. 1 .1 . ,. . .1 8. System Mapping. ' $105,000 Justification: Since the Town purchased our electric system from Public Service Company of Colorado in 1945, virtually nothing has been done to keep system maps up-to-date. With the installation of so many underground facilities, along with a greatly expanded overhead system, it is becoming increasingly more important for us to get our maps in order. There are aerial photographs of our entire service area that will be used as a base, but nearly every foot of line will need to be examined on-site to get the proper information for mapping. 9. Add approximately 2,000 sq. feet of office space to Municipal Building. $140,000 Justification: The addition of new employees by other departments has filled our East wing to maximum capacity. To add an electrical engineer and any additional personnel in the near future will require more room. Expanding to the East or adding a second story to our wing would handle this situation. LIGHT AND POWER DEPARTMENT Vehicle Bid Recap BIDDER VEHICLE TRADE-IN NET PRICE NOTES DAVIDSON 1 Ton Cab & CHEVROLET Chassis, 4-WD --------- $12,276.34 May be up to one year before they can supply this truck in a 4-wheel drive. 34 Drop 4-wheel 51 -fT;31'2:057 Will sell old com-_ U drive t.d- , ,11.4<.11.es $ 1,03-4-729' pressor truck later less when new truck is {7 ~lk; equipped and ready to use. - *. Ll.LICU tÂ·,1.. 2':..Trr76'.7. DELLENBACH 2 1 Ton Cab Cannot give delivery CHEVROLET & Chassis date. ------- $12,212.69 Cannot get EPA approval. B $5,120.00 -7,092.69 May have to re- -M '2112513*8 engineer. 49 RAINS A $12,008.29 Could not bid before FORD because duals N/A in 4-WD. $711.20 more than Dellenbach bid. B $4,000.00 8,008.29 Delivery would be 4.2070176 90 - 120 days. -â€¢ JÂ·O (G.H.V.F.D.) Aul map-c to i-yu M -11 4- dli . . 7 / PROPOSAL PERSONAL FINANCE WORKSHOP for the employees of the TOWN OF ESTES PARK presented by MANAGEMENT MOTIVATIONAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 2629 Redwing, Suite 330 Fort Collins, CO 80526 MMCI was founded by Sam Applebaum in Fort Collins, Colorado, in 1980; the company's purpose was to aid people and organizations in developing expertise in setting and reaching personal and business goals. Today MMCI continues its belief in the unlimited ability of individuals to realize their potential. Clients are encouraged to recognize and appreciate their strengths, to acknowledge their personal value, and to see their environment in the light of their expanding belief and positive attitude. The goal of MMCI is to assist clients to achieve their greatest potential in every area of life. Our methods are practical and have been demonstrated to be workable and successful. To continue this work in personal and organiza- tional development, MMCI proposes the Personal Finance Workshop for the employees of the Town of Estes Park. By helping each individual to achieve financial freedom, staff unity as well as personal fulfillment and job satisfaction will increase; this in turn leads to increased productivity and a more pleasant working environment. The following areas will be covered in the 8-hour Personal Finance Workshop: I. "Where am I now?" A. Assessing my current net worth B. Determining my immediate needs & wants II. "Where do I want to be?" A. How to set and attain realistic financial goals B. How to budget effectively III. "How can I get there?" A. The importance of risk management B. How to use professional advice (and when) C. Good tax planning D. How to use other's money (leverage) E. How Â«md.:where) to save 1. Bank accounts 2. Money market accounts 3. Stocks & bonds F. Available investments - 4 , . 1 PERSONAL FINANCE WORKSHOP Page 2 IV. Some specific examples A. Planning for retirement B. Buying a home C. Buying a car D. Planning for my children's future E. Life insurance V. A plan of action for getting started-NOW! Participants in the Personal Finance Workshop will get a clearer under- standing of the obstacles to financial freedom, and why such a small percentage of our population is independently wealthy. They will also discover that financial freedom is attainable for anyone; specific examples of methods used to achieve financial goals will be discussed. MMCI consultants do not represent any financial company or services; MMCI does provide the tools to develop an effective financial plan. The Personal Finance Workshop provides.specific, useful information and methods for achieving financial goals, presented in an informal atmosphere. MMCI's consultants encourage activeiparticipation. (Our secondary goal is to make the workshop an â‚¬ enj oyable experience for everyone who attends !) In addition, participants can utilize MMCI's toll-free hotline for follow-up questions for a full year after the workshop. RECAP OF CALLS PRIOR TO UTILITY SHUTOFFS JANUARY 1985 1ST CYCLE SHUTOFF 1/21/85 Lillian Szydlo .75 OT @ $11.2760 = $8.46 1.50 RT @ 7.5173 = 11.28 Judy McPhee .75 OT @ 8.4203 = 6.32 .25 RT @ 5.6135 = 1.40 Ernie Wach 1.00 RT @ 10.5462 = 10.55 Jerry Brumleve 1.00 RT @ 11.0712 = 11.07 $49.08 18 carls, 6 notes hung on doors 0 shutoffs 2ND CYCLE SHUTOFF 2/06/85 Lillian Szydlo 2.00 OT @ 11.2760 = 22.55 Judy McPhee .5 OT @ 8.4203 = 4.21 Jerry Brumleve 1.00 RT @ 11.0712 = 11.07 $37.83 11 calls, 3 notes on door 1 shutoff RECAP Direct wages $86.91 Long distance phone calls N/A Vehicle expense- 5-10 miles @ 22.5Â¢/mile 2.25 Total 89.16 39 calls 9 notes on doors 1 shutoff , RECAP OF CALLS PRIOR TO UTILITY SHUTOFFS MARCH, 1985 1ST CYCLE SHUTOFF 3/26/85 Lillian Szydlo .50 OT @ 11.2760 = 5.64 1.50 RT @ 7.5173= 11.28 Judy McPhee .50 OT @ 8.4203= 4.21 .50 RT @ 5.6135= 2.81 Ernie Wach 2.00 RT @ 10.5462= 21.09 45.03 11 calls, 6 notes, 1 shutoff 2ND CYCLE SHUTOFF 4/1/85 Lillian Szydlo .50 OT @ 11.2760= 5.64 1.00 RT @ 7.5173= 7.52 Judy McPhee 1.00 RT @ 5.6135= 5.61 Jerry Brumleve 2.50 RT @ 11.0712= 27.68 Ernie Wach 1.50 RT @ 10.5462= 15.82 62.30 19 calls, 5 notes, 2 shutoffs Recap: Direct wages 107.33 Vehicle expense- 60 miles @ 22.5Â¢/mile -13.50 120.83 30 calls, 11 notes, 3 shutoffs RECAP OF CALLS PRIOR TO UTILITY SHUTOFFS Â· FEBRUARY 1985 1ST CYCLE SHUTOFF 2/26/85 Lillian Szydlo 1.00 RT @ 7.51 = 7.51 Judy McPhee 1.00 RT @ 5.61 = 5.61 Jerry Brumleve 3.00 RT @ 11.0712 =33.21 46.33 14 calls, 5 notes hung on doors, 4 shutoffs. 2ND CYCLE SHUTOFF 3/4/85 Lillan Szydlo 1.50 RT @ 7.51= 11.28 .50 OT @11.276= 5.64 16.92 Judy McPhee 1.50 OT @ 8.4203 12.63 jerry Brumleve 2.50 RT @11.0712= 27.68 57.23 12 calls, 5 notes, 0 shutoffs. Recap: Direct wages 103.56 Vehicle Expense - 84 miles @ 22.5Â¢/mile 18.90 122.46 26 calls, 10 notes on doors, 4 shutoffs