The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Light and Power 1985-01-10AGENDA LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE JANUARY 10, 1985 --* \ (4% ' 1, CASCADE DAM - NATIONAL PARI< SERVICE~/- ~,~0,-~ -:~0'k.,G d.le~ t~7 '7*46. l 2. DISCONNECTS FOR NON-PAYMENT /\60 REPORTS: \0 0// ry //2 /9 1- TOWN'S PORTION OF PROJECT COSTS REBUILDING CASCADE vs NOT REBUILDING PROJECT REBUILD NOT REBUILD DIFFERENCE Cascade & Hydro $359,250 $467,025 $107,775 Facilities Other Permanent 66,079 85,902 19,823 Flood Repairs Treatment Plant -0- 176,000 176,000 Water Supply Extra costs or losses to Town if Cascade and Hydro facilities are not rebuilt $303,598 25 Years' lost benefits from: not replacing generation $403,205 $706,803 0 -- a 1 CONCRETE STORAGE DAM NET PRESENT VALUE CALCULATION INVESTMENT COST = $359,250 ENERGY PRODUCTION = 3,412,500 KW-HR INTEREST RATE = 9.00 % CAPACITY = 44 0 KW ESCALATION RATE (O&M) = 2.00 % ESCALATION RATE (ENERGY) = 2.00 % ESCALATION RATE (CAPACITY) = 2.00 % CAPITAL OTHER BENEFITS BENEFITS PRESENT VALUE PRESENT VALUE NET ANNUAL YEAR COSTS COSTS (4-2-3) FACTOR (5)*(6) (1) (2 ) (3) (4 ) (5) (6) (7) 0 359,250. -359,250. 1.000 -359,250. 1 1 37000. 107,439. 70,439. .917 64623. 2 37740. 109,588. 71,848. .842 60473. 3 38495. 111,780. 73,285. .772 56589. 4 39265. 114,015. 74,750. .708 ,52955. 5 40050. 116,295. 76,245. .650 49554. 6 40851. 118,62:1. 77,770. .596 46372. 7 41668. 120,994. 79,326. .547 - 43394. 8 42501. 123,414. 80,912. .502 40607. 9 43351. 125,882. 82,531. .460 37999. 10 44218. 128,400. 84,181. .422 . 35559. 11 45103. 130,968. l 85,865. .388 33275. 12 46005. 130,968. 84,963. .356 30207. 13 46925. 130,968. 84,043- .326 27413- 14 47863. 130,968. 83,104. .299 24869. 15 48821. 130,968. 82,147. .275 22552. 16 49797. 130,968. 81,170. .2 52 20444. 17 50793. 130,968. 80,174. .231 18526. 18 51809. 130,968. 79,159. .2 12 16781. 19 52845. 130,968. 78,122. .194 15194. 20 53902. 130,968. 77,066. .178 13756 21 54980. 130,968. 75,988. .164 12439. 22 56080. 130,968. 74,888. .150 11247. 23 57201. 130,968. 73,766. .138 10164. 24 58345. 130,968. 72,622. . 12 6 9180. 25 59512. 130,968. 71,455. .116 8287. NET PRESENT VALUE = 403,205. BENEFIT TO COST RATIO = 1.51 E-12 Â· â€¢ TOWN OF ESTES PARK - FEMA GRANT FUNDING OPTIONS July 31, 1984 REBUILD ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL - CASCADE DAM CONSTRUCTION ACTUAL FLOOD EXPENDITURES TO DATE: .. Emergency services, debris removal & temporary repairs $354,835 $354,835 FEMA cost sharing percentage x .75 x .75 Emergency costs to be reimbursed by FEMA . $266,126 $266,126 Permanent repairs to Town property damaged in flood 264,313 264,315 FEMA cost ,sharing percentage x .75 x .675 Permanent repair costs to be reimbursed by FEMA 198,236 178,413 FEMA GRANTS FOR ACTUAL EXKENDITURES: 464,362 - 444,539 FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: . t Cascade Dam Funding: - Rebuild Cascade Dam, power plant & penstock for Fall River Water Treatment Plant (negotiable ara) 1,437,000 . FEMA cost sharing percentage Â· x .75 Costs of rebuilding dam & penstock : to be reimbursed by FEMA 1,077,750 Alternative Capital Construction Difference in flexible funding 19,823 Diversion structure & power plant 864,200 Alternative capital improvement projects 522,977 , TOTAL AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR OTHER PROJECTS 1.437,000. FEMA cost sharing percentage x .675 i Costs of alternative capital construction i projects to be reimbursed by FEMA 969.975 FEMA GRANTS FOR FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES . . 1.077,750 - 969.975 TOTAL FEMA GRANTS AVAILABLE 51.562.112 51.414.5]4 1.437.000 Total cost to replace dam-in-kind x 67.5 2 Flexible funding portion : 969,975 Total Grant monies available -563,335 FEMA portion of proposed diversion structure & modified power plant - 19.823 Amount to bc gLide up if Town goes flexible funding 366.817 FEMA Grants available for other projects ft.817 - 67.5 : . 543.433 FEMA & Town's portion available for other projrcts. ..<:ef,t~4Â·19>,NCiâ‚¬ mt fw t.~ t-fr%';2 --Â·. ":wÂ·Â·e I.,yi~ ./ih:3,-~ ~fl#A~,28~.:.,-254 b ; 1, 21:-7, g:9;:2~~-f-~45~4,$-:Â·1 4 ,Â·, t.,6= *I:- ... ---_1./2.-:LE. ~ ~0~t*~Â»4Â·44*~*~~**~~~ LAND SURVEYS .--- *.*-- 1222'-:I/=5,31 222744*ZE- ..52. -L- SUBDIVISIONS - 6 7-, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING -- IMPROVEMENT PLATS ~ VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SANITARY ENGINEERING <~~ J ~~William G. VanHorn, PE & LS 9485 â€¢ Paul H. VanHorn PE & LS 532 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING . March 24, 1983 Victor L. McCracken Water Superintendent Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Vic: This is to certify that field elevations were verified for the bridge located on Fall River (west of the plant) down to the Fall River Water Treatment Plant on March 23, 1983. The elevation difference is 23.9 feet from the top of the footing of the south bridge abutment to the top of the concrete clear well structure*at the Water Treatment Plant. The footing for the south bridge abutment is approximately the same elevation as the existing river bottom. SincerelyA, A il. * 1.2. VAUC,JAY A,ZW N D 160.1 489'Rew-r.-r. 0,4 24,4,4 - El. 2964 7: 00 rt,A) William G. Van Horn PE & LS 9485 , ... . DMJMPhillipsÂ·ReisterÂ·Haley, Inc. January 7, 1985 Mr. Robert L. Richards Water Superintendent - P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Bob: Enclosed are two copies of a rough sketch of the proposed raw water diversion and pipeline to the Fall River Water Treatment Plant to replace the original power plant penstock destroyed in the Lawn Lake flood in 1982. The sketch is intended to show concept only. A more detailed design sketch would require more field survey work. Also enclosed is a copy of the survey information obtained to date. Our conceptual cost estimate for this project is as follows: t, 1. Raw water pipeline, 1500+ L.F. of - 12" D. I. pipe at $50/L.FZ $ 75,000 2. Pipeline appurtenances $ 25,000 3. Diversion structure $ 50,000 4. Piping modifications. inside plant $ 10,000 $160,000 5. Engineering, surveying and inspection $ 16,000 costs TOTAL PROJECT COST $176,000 This cost estimate was prepared from the limited information presently available. Upon completion of a more detailed preliminary design, a more accurate cost estimate can be prepared; however, we believe the conceptual estimate is sufficiently. accurate for budgetary purposes. flery tr,ly yuprs, R. K. Kemp Enclosures Planning A Subsidiary of Suite 700 Daniel. Mann. Johnion. a Mendenhall 910 Filteinth Street Architecture Denver.Colorado 80202 Engineering Telephone: 303/892-1300 Systems Cablâ€¢: OIMJIM Denver Economics I , -1 Â· i I--- .. 431 // I Â£1.i I / >1.Ir 9 1 2 ail# It // 1 1 0 1 It 0 \ /1 - 2 / N \ i i /1 // 0 1 1 // \ i 'i )1 \1 08 / 1 2 ,/1 j 4 0 0 lo 0 0 1 / CO / I b :24 C . | 1 n-// 1 14 11111 1 1 1,0. 1 .\0 7 i//lio 'rll e o 1 lili& lilli C- 2 \l ' / ff~#11/ O 9.20 71 a / 111 1// <55- O 1/ff / J: All I 4 G// P~,Â·-'Â· ill e. X , E A 27 22 C- 0 j ./ i f 4// - O, try) â‚¬ 11} 4 11 0 // 11 ill I 66 11 c , 0 -2 - 8080 / 1/ / ; r Â· Â®99Â£A 1 3 22 C:5 -g \) 0090 3 %! R A 11 21, E lo O C A- 4 C/7 \ , I 2 19 #1-3 /3 M n a Am/ . tu- 0.1-e,0 - 0 .CO CO 0 2 10,0 E 'O 6 C X : a. a 5 .2 Je \\ &20:2 a - I- 4.0.0 0, 1 \ \20*7 2 \\ . 1-4- , ;Ch-- -//0-* ----.. hiepunoil dNEW - i// ' /f 74 (00. Â¢-2 1 8/30-- '+45&0'0'2*1 -' (.4 -i .' '\CÂ· '2 3/g.#J<.' . J -Sâ€¢â€¢ 8080 J , CONCRETE STORAGE DAM NET PRESENT VALUE CALCULATION 1 INVESTMENT COST - $1,437,000 ENERGY PRODUCTION = 3,412,500 KW-HR INTEREST RATE = 9.00 % CAPACITY - 440 KW ESCALATION RATE (O&M) = 2.00 % ESCALATION RATE (ENERGY) = 2.00 % ESCALATION RATE (CAPACITY) = 2.00 % NET ANNUAL CAPITAL OTHER BENEFITS BENEFITS PRESENT VALUE PRESENT VALUE YEAR COSTS COSTS (4-2-3) FACTOR (5)*(6) (1) (2) (3) (4 ) (5) (6) (7) 0 1,437,000. -1,437,000. 1.000 -1,437,000. 1 37000. 107,439. 70,439. .917 64623. 2 37740. 109,588. 71,848. .842 60473. 3 38495. 111,780. 73,285. .772 56589. 4 39265. 114,015. 74,750. .708 52955. 5 40050. 116,295. 76,245. .650 49554. 6 40851. 118,621. 77,770. .596 46372. 7 41668. 120,994. 79,326. . 54 7 43394. 8 42501. 123,414. 80,912. .502 40607. 9 43351. 125,882. 82,531. .460 37999. 10 44218. 128,400. 84,181. .422 35559. 11 45103. 130,968. 85,865. .388 33275. 12 46005. 130,968.1 84,963. .356 30207. 13 46925. 130,968. 84,043- .326 27413. 14 47863. 130,968. 83,104. .299 24869. 15 48821. 130,968. 82,147. .275 22552. 16 49797. 130,968. 81,170. .252 20444. 17 50793. 130,968. 80,174. .231 18526. 18 51809. 130,968. 79,159. .2 12 16781. 19 52845. 130,968. 78,122. .194 15194. 20 53902. 130,968. 77,066. .178 13751. 21 54980. 130,968. 75,988. .164 12439. 22 56080. 130,968. 74,888. -150 11247. 23 57201. 130,968. 73,766. .138 10164. 24 58345. 130,968. 72,622. .12 6 9180. 25 59512. 130,968. 71,455. .116 8287. NET PRESENT VALUE = -674,546. BENEFIT TO COST RATIO - .64 E-5 J 4 CONCRETE STORAGE DAM Â· NET PRESENT VALUE CALCULATION INVESTMENT COST - $1,437,000 ENERGY PRODUCTION = 3,412,500 KW-HR INTEREST RATE = 9.00 % CAPACITY = 440 KW ESCALATION RATE (06M) = 2.00 % ESCALATION RATE (ENERGY) - 2.00 % ESCALATION RATE (CAPACITY) = 2.00 % CAPITAL OTHER BENEFITS BENEFITS PRESENT VALUE PRESENT VALUE NET ANNUAL YEAR COSTS COSTS (4-2-3) FACTOR (5)*(6) --- (1) (2 ) (3) (4 ) (5) (6) (7) 0 1,437,000. -1,437,000. 1.000 -1,437,000. 1 37000. 107,439. 70,439. .917 64623. 2 37740. 109,588. 71,848. .842 60473. 3 38495. 111,780. 73,285. .772 56589. 4 39265. 114,015. 74,750. .708 52955. 5 40050. 116,295. 76,245. .650 49554. 6 40851. 118,621. 77,770. .596 4 6 3 72. 7 41668. 120,994. 79,326. . 54 7 43394. 8 42501. 123,414. 80,912. .502 40607. 9 43351. 125,882. 82,531. .460 ' 37999. 10 44218. 128,400. 84,181. .422 35559. 11 45103. 130,968. 85,865. .388 33275. 12 46005. 130,9 68.1 84,963. .356 30207. 13 46925. 130,968. 84,043. .326 27413. 14 47863. 130,968. 83,104. .299 24869. 15 48821. 130,968. 82,147. .2 7 5 22552. 16 49797. 130,968. 81,170. .2 52 20444. 17 50793. 130,968. 80,174. .231 18526. 18 51809. 130,968. 79,159. .2 12 16781. 19 52845. 130,968. 78,122. .194 15194. 20 53902. 130,968. 77,066. .178 13751. 21 54980. 130,968. 75,988. .164 12439. 22 56080. 130,968. 74,888. .150 11247. 23 57201. 130,968. 73,766. .138 10164. 24 58345. 130,968. 72,622. . 12 6 9180. 25 59512. 130,968. 71,455. .116 8287. NET PRESENT VALUE = -674,546. BENEFIT TO COST RATIO = .64 E-5