The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2007-10-16Prepared: October 10, 2007 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION 6 Tuesday, October 16, 2007 11:30 a.m. Study Session, Rooms 201 and 202, Town Hall 1:30 p.m. Meeting, Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated September 18, 2007 b. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, DEER RIDGE SUBDIVISION, Amended Plat of Lots 3 & 4, Skoog Subdivision, 1825 & 1925 Homestead Lane, Paul M. & Katherine M. Kochevar and John A. Skoog/Applicants - Applicants' request for continuance to November 20,2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting 3. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT and REZONING REQUEST, KOSEWICK SUBDIVISION, Lot 7 (Less 8850-P194, 81743-P50), Summer Villa, 775 E. Riverside Drive Applicant: Van Horn Engineering Request: Subdivide an existing lot into three lots and an open-space outlot; and Rezone proposed Lots 1 and 2, each with an existing residence, from A-Accommodations to E-Estate Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-15, OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION, a Metes & Bounds property located at 690 Big Thompson Avenue Applicant: Our Lady of the Mountains Parish Request: Add 4,345 square feet to the existing Catholic church Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott 5. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-13, WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS, Lot 22, South Saint Vrain Addition, 1041 S. St. Vrain Avenue Applicant: The Mulhem Group, Ltd. Request: Develop 42 condominium units as follows: 8 single-family units, 2 duplex units, 2 triplex units, and one 24-unit multi-family building Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 6. REPORTS 7. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. O Estes Valley Planning Commission The next scheduled meeting will be held Tuesday, November 20,2007. There are currently two items on the agenda. You can view information about all current submittals, including next month's Planning Commission items, on our web page: www.estesnet.com/comdev/CurrentRequests.aspx Lj Lj RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DRAFT Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission September 18, 2007, 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Betty Hull; Commissioners Wendell Amos, Ike Eisenlauer, Bruce Grant, Joyce Kitchen, Doug Klink, and John Tucker Attending: Chair Hull; Commissioners Amos, Eisenlauer, Grant, Klink, and Tucker Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Town Board Liaison Homeier, Public Works Director Scott Zum, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Commissioner Kitchen, Planner Chilcott Chair Hull called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence of the meeting. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission minutes dated August 21, 2007. b. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-13, WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS, Lot 22, South Saint Vrain Addition, 1041 S. St. Vrain Avenue, The Mulhern Group, Ltd./Applicant-Request by applicant to continue this item to the Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting on October 16, 2007. c. REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 00-07C, MARY'S LAKE LODGE CONDOMINIUMS, Lot 3, Mary's Lake Subdivision, and Lots 3A and 3B of Mary's Lake Replat, 2625 Mary's Lake Road, Ram's Horn Development Co./Applicant- Request to change two buildings on Lot 3A such that each shall contain six accommodations units rather than the formerly approved four dwelling units each. No change to the building footprint is proposed. The request is in compliance with density limits. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Klink) that the consent agenda be accepted, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-10 and PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, THE TIMBERS OF ESTES, Lot 3, Schroeder Subdivision, 1240 Big Thompson Avenue, Applicant: Mark Theiss Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. This is a request to construct and condominiumize four triplexes and a single unit for a total of thirteen dwelling units on a currently undeveloped, 1.9-acre, A-Accommodations-zoned lot. The applicant proposes different unit types. The stand-alone unit is proposed on the portion of the lot closest to the neighbor's residence, thus providing transition from the adjoining single-family- residential-zoned lot to the south. District buffer landscaping will be provided along the southern property line. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 September 18,2007 The proposal meets the following Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) limits or requirements: density, impervious coverage, setbacks, pedestrian amenities and linkages, parking, and exterior lighting. Access to the proposed development will be provided from Grand Estates Drive. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be installed along the western property line bordering Grand Estates Drive; a portion of sidewalk will extend into the development. The proposed sidewalk ramps will need to meet federal ADA standards. Building code standards for handicapped accessibility will be applied when the building permits are reviewed. Sanitary sewer service will be provided through an existing eight-inch main along the southern property boundary. An eight-inch water main will be extended from the existing twelve-inch water line near the northern property boundary. The application was continued at last month's Planning Commission meeting due to drainage concerns. Two drainages from the north flow through the property. The applicant proposes to capture these flows in a swale to be built along the northern property line. Those flows will be directed into a pipe that will run through the center of the property and will be released into a detention pond near the south-central portion of the lot, which will allow release of the drainage at the historic rate and in the historic location. Also, the curb and gutter to be installed along the east side of Grand Estates Drive will capture water from the road, which will flow southward and discharge off the side of the road south of the applicant's property. The adjoining property owner to the south expressed concern about the proposed drainage and met with planning staff to review their concerns. Because the property is zoned appropriately for the proposed use (residential/accommo- dations), it is a use by right. Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed development plan. Public Comment: Paul Bennett of Alpine Engineering was present to represent the applicant. He stated the applicant has worked with Town staff to address any issues. The neighboring property owner to the south voiced some concerns regarding drainage, particularly drainage off Grand Estates Drive. Leonard "Harry" Potzler, 560 Grand Estates Drive, stated he is the property owner to the south. He is concerned about drainage from the proposed detention pond and from water directed onto his property by the new curb and gutter proposed along Grand Estates Drive. Water from the TravelLodge and Grand Estates Drive is currently absorbed by the property under consideration for development. Buildings and pavement on the lot will add to the water flowing into the detention pond, which will direct all the flows onto his property. He requested that the developer either forego installing curb and gutter or provide curb and gutter past his lot to keep road runoff flowing down Grand Estates Drive and into Lake Estes. He also requested that "no parking" signs be posted on the east side of the road. Ron Harris, no address given, questioned whether there will be a limit on the number of vehicles that can be parked on the site and expressed concern that the occupant of one of the proposed units could be trapped by an improperly parked vehicle; that particular unit does not have a large enough driveway apron for a vehicle to park in front of the garage. Planner Shirk and Director Joseph responded. Vehicles, including RVs, could be parked in the proposed development, up to the cumulative number allowed by the development code. The driveway is a private drive; there is no entitlement to park anywhere on the site that is not a paved parking area as depicted on the development plan. Properly prepared covenants would address how parking is allocated and used, as well as where guest parking is allowed. Further comments from Mr. Bennett are summarized as follows. There is no existing curb and gutter along Grand Estates Drive; drainage from the road flows through the applicant's property, into the natural swale, and onto the property to the south. Adding curb and gutter will concentrate flows along Grand Estates Drive. The applicant is not D-R-AFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 September 18, 2007 willing to extend curb and gutter past the property to the south at the applicant's expense. The area is affected by drainage from properties north of Highway 34. If TravelLodge is redeveloped in the future, additional detention should be added on that site. The Town's Public Works Department has requested the applicant provide a twenty-foot-wide drainage easement along the southern property line for possible future use. The applicant is willing to do so. Public Works Director Scott Zurn reviewed drainage flows in the area. Two drainages enter the property from the north and meet (forming a "Y") before exiting the property at the south-central portion of the site. The requested drainage easement will reserve the right to route drainage as it historically flowed. The developer is installing curb and gutter along Grand Estates Drive at the request of the Public Works Department. A long-term goal is to provide curb and gutter along both sides of Grand Estates Drive to direct runoff into the lake. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Eisenlauer) to approve Development Plan 07-10, The Timbers of Estes, Lot 3, Schroeder Subdivision, and to recommend approval of the accompanying Preliminary Condominium Map to the Town Board of Trustees, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. Final construction plans (including erosion control plan) shall be approved by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department and Estes Park Sanitation District prior to issuance of the grading permit and/or first building permit. 2. Compliance with the following memos: a. From Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated July 19, 2007. b. From Scott Zum to Dave Shirk dated July 27,2007. c. From Estes Park Sanitation District to Dave Shirk dated August 15, 2007. 3. The trash enclosure shall be subject to review and approval of the Colorado Division of Wildlife prior to issuance of first building permit, and shall be installed prior to issuance of first certificate of occupancy. 4. The grading plan shall bear an engineer's stamp. 5. Copies of applicable state permits shall be submitted with first grading/building permit (e.g., stormwater, CDOT access). 6. A development agreement and form of guarantee shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the town prior to issuance of any permits. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-12, SNUGGLERS COVE, a Metes and Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on the YMCA of the Rockies campus, 2515 Tunnel Road, Applicant: YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. This is a request to build six new four-bedroom guest cabins and two new eight-bedroom "reunion cabins" at the YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center. The proposed units will be in the southeast quadrant of the YMCA grounds with access off Mesa Drive. A new master plan for the YMCA was approved by the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners in March 2007. This approval granted waivers to some development standards, such as paving, but also applied specific conditions of approval. The master plan conditions of approval are conditions of this proposed development plan. The proposed street names for the two drives that will access the units must meet Larimer County street-naming standards. Paved parking, curbs, and sidewalk will be provided in front of the reunion cabins. The applicant must pay special attention to revegetation of the western edge of this parking lot due to the fairly steep grade. Changes have been made to the submitted plans to remove all of the previously proposed parking-lot lighting. The applicant has minimized all proposed exterior lighting, which must be code compliant. Each cabin will be provided with an outdoor trash receptacle. A stormwater filtration pond is proposed north of the northernmost reunion cabin. Water is available to serve the DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 September 18, 2007 proposed development through the YMCA's private water system, which has recently been extensively upgraded. This request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from the Larimer County Engineering Department and Building Department, Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department, and Public Works Department, Upper Thompson Sanitation District, and Town Attorney White. The proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan and Estes Valley Development Code as conditioned by the YMCA Master Plan approval. Planning staff recommends approval of the development plan. Public Comment: Jes Reetz, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, was present to represent the applicant. The applicant agrees to all recommended conditions of approval. The trash receptacles at the new units will be bear-proof. Barbara Finley, adjacent property owner/2634 Dorsey Circle, expressed concern about lack of landscaping around parking lots on the YMCA grounds and questioned whether landscaping would be required and when it would be installed. Mr. Reetz stated landscaping would be installed as promptly as possible following installation of infrastructure. Planner Shirk noted all landscaping must be installed or financially guaranteed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new cabins. The recently approved YMCA master plan provides that new parking-lot landscaping shall exceed the required amount by 20% Mark Holdt, YMCA Vice President, stated landscaping should be installed during planting season. The parking lot will be landscaped as shown on the submitted plans. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Amos) to approve Development Plan 07-12, Snugglers Cove, a Metes and Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on the YMCA of the Rockies campus, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. A Development Construction Permit is required through the Larimer County Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Compliance with memo from Traci Downs to Dave Shirk dated September 6,2007. 3. Compliance with memo from Greg Sievers and Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 23,2007. 4. The owner's statement shall be revised to reference Larimer County instead of the Town of Estes Park. 5. The proposed slope along the western edge of the parking lot requires special consideration, per Section 7.2. Method of accomplishing revegetation (i.e., erosion mats, deep-rooting plants) shall be included on the plan. 6. Street names shall be changed to conform to Larimer County street naming standards. 7. Location of street signs and street sign specifications shall be shown on the plat. 8. The ADA route shall be designed to meet federal accessibility standards (slope and width of sidewalk ramps). 9. Details of the sediment filtration pond shall be included on the plan and shall be subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-14, DELLA TERRA, a Metes and Bounds property located at 3501 Fall River Road, Applicant: Della Terra, LLC Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. The applicant's property is on edge of the Estes Valley planning area and is bordered on the north and west by Rocky Mountain National Park. It is currently developed with 100 campsites, a small motel, cabin units, and a coffee shop. The applicant proposes to remove all campsites and develop a DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 5 September 18, 2007 fourteen-room guest lodge/wedding facility; the motel, cabins, and coffee shop would remain. The redevelopment is minor and will consist primarily of paving the existing drive and building a new lodge in an area currently used for RV campsites. Very little additional site disturbance is proposed. An area for outdoor weddings is proposed west of the new lodge; this area could accommodate up to 160 guests. No improvements are proposed for this outdoor wedding area. Although the proposed lodge is a large structure, it meets the height limit because it will be located in an existing cut. The property is 12.73 acres in size and is located entirely above the blue line. Because of this, 80% of the land area was netted out for density calculations. The proposal complies with density requirements. The applicant proposes to continue to use the existing well system (with improvements to the system) on the site. The wells were adjudicated in 1975; the Larimer County Health Department has indicated the wells are excellent in terms of water quality and flow. The applicant submitted a water study using methodology provided by the Town Water department, which indicated water usage will decrease by 30% with this redevelopment. There are ongoing discussions between the applicant and the town regarding annexation of this property; water service to the property is one of the main discussion points. Staff recommends that annexation of the property be a condition of approval. Larimer County has agreed to cede building permit review and issuance to the town based on the pending annexation of the property. The existing driveway into the site will be paved. Parking will be added along the drive in locations that are now generally camping sites. A small section of interior road will be added to provide an emergency-vehicle turnaround. To meet landscaping requirements, a few more shrubs must be added to the parking areas. The parking calculations must be corrected on the plan cover sheet, although the plans show the required number of parking spaces. There will be a decrease in the daily vehicle trips generated; the Colorado Department of Transportation has indicated that no new access permit is required. This request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from Town Attorney Greg White, Town of Estes Park Building Department and Public Works Department, Upper Thompson Sanitation District, and Rocky Mountain National Park. The national park expressed concern about outside noise levels. There will be no outdoor sound amplification, and reception activities will be held indoors. The town's noise ordinance will apply to this site. Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed development plan. Town Attorney White stated the current intergovernmental agreement between Larimer County and the Town of Estes Park requires any development such as this be annexed to the town at the town's sole discretion. Staffs recommended condition of approval #1, which states "The applicant shall submit an annexation petition to the Town Clerk no later than March 31, 2008," should be changed to require annexation by that date. Connection to town water shall be addressed with the annexation agreement. Director Joseph stated he received comments from Rick Spowart, Colorado Division of Wildlife, indicating that the change of use of this property from a campground to a wedding facility will reduce the adverse impacts to the area's big horn sheep. Public Comment: Pam Amelang/Della Terra, LLC thanked the Commissioners and town staff and expressed her excitement for the project and its positive impact on Estes Park. Mike Sanem/3355 Fall River Road stated the applicants have visited with them about the proposal several times; they are quite pleased with the plan. He questioned when the camping use would cease, stating he would not want both camping and the wedding facility uses to occur at the same time. Ms. Amelang stated camping will be discontinued when the grand opening of the wedding facility occurs (currently estimated to be at the end of 2008); the uses will not coexist. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 6 September 18, 2007 It was moved and seconded (Klink/Eisenlauer) to approve Development Plan 07-14, Della Terra, a Metes and Bounds property located at 3501 Fall River Road, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff and with condition #1 revised as shown, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. The property shall be annexed into the Town of Estes Park no later than March 31, 2008. 2. Compliance with memo from Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 31,2007. 3. Stormwater management plan shall be subject to review and approval of the Town Engineer. 4. Compliance with memo from Doug Ryan to Dave Shirk dated August 27,2007. 5. Compliance with memo from Upper Thompson Sanitation District to Dave Shirk dated August 21, 2007. 6. A development agreement and letter of credit shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. The parking lot screening shall comply with Section 7.5 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 8. The parking summary table shall be amended to include the coffee, motel, and cabins requirements, and the Lodge requirements shall be amended to require 28 spaces instead of 14. 6. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, DEER RIDGE SUBDIVISION, Amended Plat of Lots 3 and 4, Skoog Subdivision, 1825 and 1925 Homestead Lane, Applicants: Paul M. and Katherine M. Kochevar and John A. Skoog Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. This is a request to adjust the interior boundary line between Lots 3 and 4 of the Skoog Subdivision and subdivide the largest lot (Lot 3) into three smaller lots. Lot 3 formerly contained three tourist cabins and was zoned for multi-family development. It was rezoned in 2003 to E-1-Estate in conjunction with the preliminary plat review, and two of the cabins have since been removed. The final plat was approved but expired prior to recordation and is null and void; thus the applicant has submitted a new plat for review. The third cabin would have to be removed before another residence could be constructed on the proposed lot on which it is situated. With this plat, the applicant proposes to extend water and sewer mains into the neighborhood and provide fire hydrants. The applicant also proposes to move an existing road farther north and pave it to the western edge of proposed Lot 2. The former road area will be revegetated. The existing road erodes severely during rains and plugs the culvert, resulting in storm drainage flowing over the road. Paving will alleviate potential stormwater problems. The proposed alignment of the private drive to serve two of the lots would also have the effect of removing the traffic for two dwellings from a portion of the existing road, thus helping reduce the overall traffic impact on the neighborhood. The property is within a mapped steep-slope hazard area. The Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) allows an experienced engineer to address steep-slope hazards rather than requiring a professional geologist to prepare a report, provided that site plans and building foundations are prepared by a licensed engineer, with an emphasis on drainage. The applicant proposes building envelopes to prevent development on the steepest portions of the site and minimize site disturbance. Neighboring property owners Mark and Rebecca Elrod, 675 Summerset Court, have expressed concern about geologic and drainage issues. The applicant's property is in a different drainage than the Elrod's property. Town Engineer/Public Works Director Scott Zurn has expressed some concern regarding the road design and drainage issues. Director Zurn addressed the Commissioners. He stated drainage sheet flows from the north to the south and drainage off the existing road are captured in a roadside ditch. The applicant's proposal does not adequately address the drainage. The detention area may need to be changed or resized. He also expressed concern about the proposed road width; mountain road standards require the road be two feet wider than proposed to DR-AFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 7 September 18, 2007 provide for emergency vehicle access. A fire hydrant proposed at the end of the road (beyond the proposed pavement) should have paved access and a paved area for emergency vehicle turnaround. These issues may necessitate additional easements be granted along the length of the applicant's property. Director Zurn also requests some minor corrections to the language on the plat. The consulting engineer for this proposal, Paul Kochevar, was unable to attend today's meeting due to a family emergency. A letter from Mr. Kochevar received today acknowledges the concerns expressed by Director Zurn and requests approval of the preliminary plat as presented. Director Zurn requested this application be continued to the October 16, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. Public Comment: The property owner, John Skoog, was present and indicated he is in the process of selling the property to Mr. Kochevar. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Grant) to continue the Preliminary Subdivision Plat, Deer Ridge Subdivision, Amended Plat of Lots 3 and 4, Skoog Subdivision, to the Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting on October 16, 2007 in order to resolve the issues presented by Town Engineer Zurn, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. 7. PROPOSED BLOCK 10 AMENDMENTS TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE This request is to make additions and a correction to the Estes Valley Development Code, and is a continuation of discussions which began at the Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting of August 21, 2007. Director Joseph presented information on the proposed changes as follows: Section 3.1.D, Required Times for Action and Inaction, addition of proposed subsection 5, Extension of Times, regarding timeframes for action on all land- use applications; and Section 3.2, Standard Review Procedure, addition of proposed subsection H, Alternative Review Procedure, regarding provision of optional alternative review procedure Proposed Section 3.1.D allows the temporary extension of timeframes for review of land-use applications due to short-staffing, a vacancy, or an extremely heavy workload in the Community Development Department, or any other factor that would prevent adequate and timely review of applications. Extension would be at the discretion of the Community Development Director and would be for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days beyond the normal timeframe for review. In response to Commissioners' request at the August meeting to identify a trigger or threshold for this extension, Director Joseph offered to add the following language as the final sentence of this subsection: "A vacancy of more than three weeks in Planning staff due to personnel changes, medical leave, or other FMLA-authorized absence shall be considered adequate grounds for an Extension of Time under this provision." Following further discussion, it was agreed that this additional language would be too restrictive and that the trigger for time extension should be based on workload, as originally proposed. Proposed Section 3.2.H provides the applicant an alternative to waiting an additional sixty days if the time extension has been invoked. It allows the applicant to elect to pay for the services of a qualified professional planner, chosen from a list of appropriate consultants maintained by the Community Development Department, to process and review the application. This option may be attractive to an applicant who wishes to stay on a particular time schedule for development purposes. Public Comment: None. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 8 September 18,2007 It was moved and seconded (Tucker/Grant) to recommend approval of the proposed amendments to Section 3.1.D and 3.2 of the Estes Valley Development Code, with the deletion of the final sentence of proposed Section 3.1.D.5, to the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Commissioners, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. Sed\on 4.3, Table 4-2, Base Density and Dimensional Standards, Residential Zoning Districts, regarding required setbacks from interior drives in the RM- Mu/ti-Fami/y Residentia/ zoning district Director Joseph stated the proposed change to footnote [9] of EVDC Table 4-2 is a "housekeeping" item. The footnote pertains to setbacks in multi-family residential developments and currently implies that no street setback is required. Staff would like to clarify that structures must be set back from public or private roads that serve more than four adjacent or off-site dwellings. If the road does not serve more than four dwellings, the setback requirements are not invoked. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Eisenlauer/Amos) to recommend approval of the proposed amendments to Section 4.3, Table 4-2 of the Estes Valley Development Code to the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and Larimer County Commissioners, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. 8. REPORTS Planner Shirk stated the Board of County Commissioners approved the Panthen lot consolidation plat at their meeting on September 17, 2007. He also recently attended a workshop on accessory dwelling units and will have input on this issue for Planning Commission consideration at a future meeting. There being no further business, Chair Hull adjourned the meeting at 3:15 p.m. Betty Hull, Chair Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary DR-A-]ET Kosewick Subdivision Preliminary Plat ~ and Rezoning Request Estes Park Community Development Department -~ Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~ PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: October 16,2007 REOUEST: Subdivide a parcel into three individual lots, and rezone the two lots with existing dwellings from " A" Accommodations to "E" Estate. .4/ E Fep k 1/ LOCATION: The site is located at 775 --yljk 129 [2~MLf=='~-""'- USE -, Riverside Drive, within unincorporated ' Larimer County. A %42-urh i 'r\_ Niblr,Win 7 -~101 M APPLICANT: Van Horn Engineering ~atioral 1~rk m LA *J I â‚¬ Ul PROPERTY OWNER: Dale and -M. -, L rh = USFS Christine Kosewick 11-3 1~1-1-U RA+P STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Van Horn Engineering (Celine LeBeau), 586-9388 Parcel Number: 3535105007 Development Area: 2.6 acres Number of Lots: One existing, three Existing Land Use: TWO detached dwelling proposed (plus three nonbuildable outlots, units for a total of six lots) Proposed Land Use: Same, with one lot Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations available for accommodation/multi-family (Lots 1 and 2 proposed for "E" Estate M development acre zone designation) Adjacent Zoning- East:: "E-1" Estate North: "CO" Commercial Outlying (with PUD overlay) West: "A" Accommodations South: "RE" Rural Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Single-family residential North: Resort Accommodations (Trendwest) West: RV Park South: Single-family residential Services- Water: Town Sewer: UTSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to subdivide a property into three separate lots and rezone two of those lots from "A" Accommodations to "E" Estate. The plat includes three non-buildable outlots that contain wetlands; this plat includes provision to relocate certain wetlands. There are two existing dwellings on the lot. These are to be split from the existing lot and would each be contained on a newly created lot (Lots 1 and 2); these are the lots to be rezoned from accommodations to single-family residential use. Sidewalk improvements are necessary, as is a water main extension and electrical work. Annexation. The applicant has submitted an annexation petition to the Town Clerk. The hearing has been set for November 27, which is the same "target" date for the preliminary plat. REVIEW CRITERIA: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular proj ect. Rezoning. Staff recommends rezoning for proposed Lots 1 and 2 from "A" Accommodations to single-family residential. These lots do not lend themselves to accommodations development, and the proposed rezoning will allow the existing use to continue. The applicant has requested a Minor Modification to allow the lots to be smaller than the required 1/2-acre. After discussion with Town Attorney White, it is Staff' s opinion this modification is not necessary due to the presence of the outlots (see Slope Protection section below). Subdivision Design Standards. Streets and Roads. The following note should be placed on the plat: "Access to Lot 3 shall be required to meet access standards of the Town of Estes Park." Sidewalks, Pedestrian Connections and Trails. A sidewalk is proposed along the eastern/southern perimeter of the site, attached to Riverside Drive. This will provide continuation of the sidewalk system to the north. A twenty-five foot wide trail easement is proposed along the river. Page #2 - Kosewick Subdivision Preliminary Plat Slope Protection and Analysis. Section 7.1 of the Estes Valley Development Code provides for increased lot size for lots exceeding twelve percent average slope, which applies to this subdivision. This adjustment does not apply to Lot 3; slope does not affect "A" zoned lots. Instead, slope adjusts the land area per unit requirement. Lots 1 and 2 do not meet the adjusted minimum lot size. However, when the outlot space is added to these lots, the adjusted minimum lot size is met. Therefore, Staff recommends these lots be conveyed with their "partner" lot: Lot 1 and 1A, Lot 2 and 2A, and Lot 3 and 3A. Wetlinds and Stream Corridor Protection. The site contains areas of wetlands. The majority of these have been placed in non-buildable outlots. This proposal calls for the relocation of two wetland areas, thus "consolidating" wetland areas into a compact well defined area. This will provide for a healthier wetland system, and will also allow greater flexibility in future site design of Lot 3. Geologic and Wildfire Hazard Areas. The site contains a mapped "alluvial fan" geologic hazard. This area has been placed in a non-buildable outlot. Water. The subdivider shall install water mains, service lines, fire hydrants and appurtenances in accordance with the current water design and construction standards of the Town. The water main north of the property is to be extended south to the Lot 2/3 boundary, where the fire hydrant will be located. Fire Protection. One additional fire hydrant is proposed, which is sufficient for the subdivision. Additional hydrants may be necessary depending on the scope of future Lot 3 development. Electric. Electric service will be from an existing transformer located near the northern property line. This will provide underground service to the existing dwellings, and will then extend to provide future service to proposed Lot 3. The subdivider is responsible for this service. Sanitary Sewer. The existing sewer main through the eastern portion of the site can accommodate future development needs. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Public Works provided numerous comments which should be addressed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer prior to hearing by the Town Board. Page #3 - Kosewick Subdivision Preliminary Plat Utilities. The Light and Power and Water Department submitted comments which should be addressed to the satisfaction of the Utilities Superintendent prior to hearing by the Town Board. Upper Thompson Sanitation District has noted "collection system personnel have in the past, gained access to [the sewer main in] the lower portion of the property by using the existing gravel road. Future development of Lot 3 may jeopardize this access." Therefore, Staff recommends an access easement be provided for UTSD access. This access easement should be subject to review and approval of the Upper Thompson Sanitation District prior to preliminary plat hearing by the Town Board. Notice. The applicant/owner is hereby notified EVDC Â§10.2.A states "No owner or agent of the owner of any land located within an addition or subdivision shall transfer, sell, agree to sell or negotiate to sell any land by reference to, exhibition of or by the use of a plan, plat or map of an addition or subdivision before such plan, plat or map has been approved pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 3 of this Code and recorded in the office of the clerk and recorder of Larimer County, Colorado." Public Improvements. All required improvements shall be completed and guaranteed in compliance with Section 10.5.K of the EVDC. This includes specific requirements concerning the form of guarantee, improvement agreement, time for completion, and warranty. Other. There are several small formatting changes required. These have been forwarded to the consulting engineer, and do not warrant inclusion in the staff report. For example, the references to required building setback should be removed from the plat. If these formatting changes have not been addressed prior to planning commission hearing, a revised list of suggested conditions will be presented. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Therefore, Staff finds: 1. This proposal complies with applicable sections of the development code. 2. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed subdivision. 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 4. Pursuant to Town Board policy, all conditions of approval shall be satisfied prior to Town Board hearing. 5. This is a Planning Commission recommendation to the Town Board. 6. The applicant is hereby notified the plat will not be scheduled for Town Board hearing until relevant conditions of approval have been met; Page #4 - Kosewick Subdivision Preliminary Plat Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Kosewick Subdivision Preliminary Plat CONDITIONAL TO: 1. The outlots shall be named lA, 2A, and 3A (instead of A, B, and C). 2. Lot 1 and Outlot lA shall remain under common ownership. A deed restriction shall be submitted with the final plat. 3. Lot 2 and Outlot 2A shall remain under common ownership. A deed restriction shall be submitted with the final plat. 4. Lot 3 and Outlot 3A shall remain under common ownership. A deed restriction shall be submitted with the final plat. 5. The following note shall be placed on the plat: "Access to Lot 3 shall be required to meet access standards o f the Town o f Estes Park." 6. Note 1 of the plat shall be amended to read "Outlot acreage is used for density calculation for Lot 3 and minimum lot size for Lots 1 and 2. 7. Final plat submittal shall include a wetlands creation report, which shall be accounted for with the improvement agreement. 8. An access easement shall be provided for UTSD access. This access easement shall be subject to review and approval of the Upper Thompson Sanitation District prior to preliminary plat hearing by the Town Board. 9. Compliance with the following memos: a. From Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated September 28,2007. b. From Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated 9-14-07. c. From Jeff Boles to Bob Goehring dated 9-19-2007. and; Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed rezoning of Lots 1 and 2 from "A" Accommodations to "R" Residential CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Recording of the Final Plat. 2. Outlots 1A and 2A shall be zoned "R" Residential. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the preliminary plat and rezoning to the Town Board of Trustees with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. (Other options) DENIAL: I move to recommend DISAPPROVAL of the preliminary plat to the Town Board of Trustees because. . . (state reasonfor denial -findings). CONTINCANCE: I move to recommend CONTINUANCE of the plat to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance - findings). Note: The applicant must agree -in writing - to a continuance, otherwise the application is deemed approved. Page #5 - Kosewick Subdivision Preliminary Plat , Â® ESTES PARK COLORADO Town of Estes Park Memo Public Works Engineering Room 100, Municipal Building P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 TO: Dave Shirk, Planner 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org From: Scott Zum, Director Date: September 28,2007 Re: Kosewick Subdivision, 775 Riverside Drive After reviewing Preliminary Subdivision Plat the Public Works Engineering Department has the following comments 1. Identify and plan permanent access points on Riverside Drive. 2. For clarity: show 18" watermain and all property lines across the street. 3. Provide Plan & Profile sheets for street construction and storm water inlets. 4. Provide minimum 50' Right-of-Way, all along frontage. 5. Provide final Drainage Report. Identify new culverts, catch basins and provide Stormwater easements. 6. Provide asphalt maintenance, and Stormwater maintenance agreements. 7. For clarity: number all sheets sequentially. 8. Remove street cross-section from water utility sheets. f0 f- ( Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 09-14-07 Re: Kosewick Subdivision, 775 E. Riverside Drive The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for a Preliminary Subdivision Plat for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4) The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5) Easements need to accompany new lot lines in new proposed locations. 6) The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 7) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 8) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 9) All primary electric must be buried 4' deep in a 4" conduit with warning tape at 2'. All secondary must be buried 2' deep with warning tape at l' in the appropriately sized conduit for the conductor. 10) The submitted plan reads, existing pedestal, it should read three phase primary cubicle. 11) The submitted plan does reflect proper information as agreed during a meeting between VHE and L&P. 1 Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum ESTES |BE| PARK COLORADO TO: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 9/1 W2007 Re: Kosewick Subdivision, Lot 7, Less 850-194, 1743-50, Summer Villa, 775 E. Riverside Drive After review of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat and Rezoning Request the Water Department has the following comments: 1) A Water Main Extension will be required for service, including Fire Protection. This infrastructure must be installed, testing preformed/passed and accepted by the Department prior to issuance of any building permits. Any project phasing of the infrastructure must be submitted with the construction drawings for approval prior to construction. Phased infrastructure must be completed and accepted prior to issuance of any building permits within the phase. 2) Construction drawings are required for the project. Drawings must be approved and signed by the Utilities Director or designated representative prior to anv construction. All water line design and construction shall be done according to the Water Utility Policies and Standards. All water main lines and easements must be deeded to the Town of Estes Park. Construction drawings must include: â€¢ Plan and profile to show potential conflicts between water and other utilities including culverts, show Utility Easement locations when utility is not in Road Right of Way. 3) If the property is outside the Town Limits it must show proof of inclusion in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. 4) The existing water service line must be abandoned at the tap across Riverside Drive and connected over to the new water main when the new main line is placed in service. C f MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: September 21, 2007 Subject: Kosewick Subdivision Lot 7, Less 850-194, 1743-50, Summer Villa 775 Riverside Drive The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application in regards to a Preliminary Subdivision Plat and Rezoning request for the above-referenced property. Please see attached Development Plan Review Checklist for comments. Review Date: 9/21/2007 Review By: Will Birchfield DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 775 Riverside Drive U Official street names and addresses shall be assigned by the Department of Building Safety. According to the Department of Building Safety Records, the address should be 775 Riverside Drive, not 775 East Riverside Drive. The remaining comments are contingent on this property being Annexed to the Town. U Floodplain Development permits are required for any and all activity in the floodplain. U Grading plans and permits are required prior to and are separate from building permits. A grading permit is required prior to any grading or excavation (Estes Park Municipal Code Â§14.12.030) U The limits of site disturbance shall be maintained and are restricted to within the property lines and/or to areas specified on the approved plans. El Prior to any excavation and/or construction activity, a detailed drainage/erosion plan to protect neighboring properties, public right-of-ways, floodplains and drainage areas during the construction phase shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Filtration of storm water is required prior to release from the site. Failure to comply with said approved plans may result in an immediate stop work order on the entire development. The final site drainage plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department. U All requirements of the approved development plan shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of approved variances shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of Planning Commission conditions of approval shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-775 Riverside Dr..doc Revised 10/17/2006- CB GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 September 26,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Preliminary Subdivision Plat and Rezoning Request - Kosewick Subdivision Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: Preliminary Subdivision Plat 1. The Preliminary Subdivision Plat indicates that the portion of the proposed wetlands be excluded from the Outlots in exchange for restoration of upland inclusions within the Outlot. The Statement of Intent indicates a density transfer from the Outlots to the three lots. Since the property is being annexed to the Town, it is my opinion that issues with regard to the density trans fur, exclusions of wetlands from Outlots, and restoration of upland inclusions best be addressed in the context of an Annexation Agreement during annexation of the property. 2. The Statement of Intent indicates the Applicants are requesting a "Waiver" for the setback of a drive from the street right-of-way. It is myopinion that this is a request for a continuance of an existing non-conforming structure on the property. There is no need for a waiver. The Plat shall contain a Note stating that the approval of the Subdivision Plat does not alter the non-conforming status of the parking area and driveway. Rezoning Request 1. No comment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. *frrulyÂ¥airs, ~ Greg~ A. White GAW/ldr cc: Van Horn Engineering, Celine LeBeau Fax: 970/586-8101 C C â‚¬ UPPER ' Dismicip P.O. Box 568 ret**:y Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (970)-586-4544 11 11 SEP 2 0 20077i[~11 (970) 586-1049 Fax September 18, 2007 Landf Dave Shirk, Planner II Town of Estes Park P.O. 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Kosewick Subdivision Lot 7, Less 850-194,1743-50, Summer Villa, 775 E. Riverside Drive Dear Dave, The Upper Thompson Sanitation District submits the following comments for the above referenced property: â€¢ The property is currently being served by the District. â€¢ A 6" Commercial Plant Investment Fee exists for this property, which allows for 192 FUV's. The District will need to perform a complete Fixture Unit Inventory on both of the residences that are on this property to determine the existing fixture units, and what FUV's will be available for future development. â€¢ Conversion fees in the amount of $150.00 per residential/accommodation unit will be due for the split ofthe Plant Investment Fee into individual billing accounts. â€¢ Due to the proposed lot divisions, each residence will be required to install separate service laterals, thereby eliminating the joint use currently in place. â€¢ All private service laterals must be installed to District specifications and any existing laterals that do not meet District specifications must be upgraded at this time. â€¢ The present topography has made it difficult to inspect and maintain the collection line that runs across the property. Even though the District owns a fifteen foot wide dedicated sewer easement, collection system personnel have in the past, gained access to the lower portion of the property by using the existing gravel road. Future development of Lot 3 may jeopardize this access. Because this is such an environmentally sensitive area, the District hopes that unobstructed access can continue in order to gain entry to the lower portion ofthe property. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank You, 04-614 Chris Bieker Operations Manager Upper Thompson Sanitation District cc: Celine LeBeau Van Horn Engineering A LAIUMER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~COUNTY Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer -Fb DATE: September 20,2007 SUBJECT: Kosewick Subdivision - Estes Valley Planning Area Proiect Description/Background: The site wililikely be annexed into the town limits as part of this proposal. The proposal includes a subdivision to subdivide a 2.61 acre parcel into 3 lots. The site address is at 775 East Riverside Drive. There are two existing cabins and each cabin will not be associated with an individual lot. The 3rd lot will remain undeveloped at this time and will also remain A-zoned. The current accesses are off of Riverside Drive. Stormwater drains in a sheet flow fashion across the property to the north and ultimately into the Big Thompson River. Review Criteria: Development review staff has reviewed the submitted materials per the criteria found in the Larimer County Estes Valley Development Code, County Rural Area Road Standards, and County Storm-Water Design Standards. Comments: If the site and adjacent roadway are not annexed with the development application, the following comments will need to be addressed with future submittals: â€¢ Since the two homes exist, our staff can support the variance request to have all portions of the existing drives moved out of the right-of-way and at least 3 feet back from the right-of-way line. The relocated improvements can not have any impacts to the sight distance at the access or along Riverside Drive. In addition, the revised improvements shall be such that vehicles will not need to be parked within the right-of-way limits or back out into the road to exit the site. â€¢ Riverside Drive is functionally classified as a minor collector which currently requires an 80 foot right-of-way. Based on the submitted information, it appears that there is only a 30,foot half right-of-way at this location. Therefore, an additional 10 feet of right-of-way is likely necessary across the proposed Lot 3 to satisfy the 40 foot half right-of-way requirement. Since Lots 1 and 2 have existing residences near the future right-of-way limit, the right-of-way requirement at these locations could potentially be waived at this time. â€¢ Larimer County Rural Area Road Standards would like to point out that, per Table 10-1 of the Rural Area Road Standards, the minimum required access spacing for Minor Collectors is 330 COMMITTED TO-EXCELLENCE feet for high volume drives such as this. Therefore, the proposed access to lot 3 shall be required to meet these requirements. The proposed access to lot 3 may need to be moved further southwest to comply with these requirements. Another option is to have the access aligned with the access on the east side of Riverside Drive. If the access can not meet access spacing requirements, than an appropriate variance request shall be submitted. â€¢ It appears from the submitted plan that there may be an exiting access onto Riverside Drive for Lot 3. This access shall be abandoned as part of this application. â€¢ For maintenance purposes, a paved apron will be required for the shared access to Lot a 1 and 2 and for the future access to Lot 3. The final plans shall show the depth and type of material for both the aggregate base course and asphalt. Sufficient detail for the access within the County right-of-way shall also be added to the final plans. The information provided should include spot elevations, percent slopes and 20 foot minimum radii. Within the right-of-way of the County, Rod the County requires a 24 foot wide access for a multi-family drive. The access can narrow to 16 feet once outside the right-of-way limits. The cross-slope for the access drive and the access roadside swales shall also be defined on the plans. Plan and profile information is needed for the access. â€¢ The access easement to serve Lot 1 and 2 needs to have a separate agreement, or other appropriate document, to be recorded that specifically contains information that grants the right of access for emergency and service vehicles and that defines the persons/entities entitled to use the roads, the purpose for and manner in which the roads may be used, any limitations on the use of the roads, the persons/entities authorized and responsible to construct and maintain the roads, the persons/entities authorized to enforce the terms of the easement and the penalties for violation of the terms of the easement. The reception number for this agreement shall be placed on the amended plat. â€¢ Any future improvements to the site will need to comply with EVDC Section 7.2.D.g and, if not annexed, LCLUC Section 4.2 (Floodplain Overlay Zone District). â€¢ Final plans will be required. The plans shall include all construction details, spot elevations, cross-sections, erosion control requirements, etc necessary to build the project. The detailed construction plans need to include proposed contours, finished floor and lowest opening elevations. The drainage swales for routing flow need to be shown on the plans with typical cross-sections as necessary. All applicable notes found in the Larimer County Rural Area Road Standards shall be transferred to the final plan set. Permits: 1. If this section of the road is not annexed, any work in on Riverside Drive will require an Access or Utility Permit from this office. Access information and permits can be obtained by contacting Marc Lyons, Access & Utility Permit Coordinator, at (970) 498-5709. 2. If one acre or more of land is disturbed with this development, the applicant is required to apply for a Stormwater Construction Permit from the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Recommendation: If the site and road are not annexed, we would expect that the above comments are addressed. The applicant should be aware that our department has based the comments on the submitted information and once the additional information has been submitted, we may have additional comments. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5701 or e-mail at tdowns@larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Van Horn Engineering, 1043 Fish Creek Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 reading file file HAI)EVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\Kosewick Sub\Kosewick Subdivision.doc 111-VI 0 ~ ~ SEP - 5 2007 ~ ~ i. 11-=3 STATEMENT OF INTENT FOR THE PROPOSED KOSEWICK 3/for'r97ETrtF--Ill--V-- Rezoning Request, Preliminary Subdivision, Annexation The subject property owned by Dale Kosewick is currently zoned A-Accommodations and contains two single family homes on the property. The property contains 2.612 acres and the applicant would like to annex in to the Town and divide the property into three lots, two of which would be zoned E-Estate and one which would remain A-Zone. This would then require a rezone to accomplish the change to E-Estate lots. The two E-Estate lots would contain the two single family homes (one on each lot) and the A-Zone would be a vacant lot. There is wetland habitat located on the property. Most of this wetland . habitat would be placed in three separate outlots (A, B, and C) that would allow density transfer to the three lots to achieve minimum required lot size for the desired zoning. The Lot labels detail the acreage transfer from each outlot to each buildable lot. The outlots will be utility and drainage easements for stormwater that enters the property from the surrounding land (across Riverside Drive). The outlots will be managed by a Home Owners Association. The subdivision will require utility main extensions. Water, electric, gas, telephone and cable will all be extended to the property. All are currently on or adjacent to the property but will need to be extended to reach the three proposed lots. Sewer currently exists on the property and crosses all three proposed lots. It will not need to be extended. Overhead utility lines that currently exist on Lots 1 and 2 will be replaced with buried electric lines. The water line that is currently in use will be abandoned and a new line installed beneath the proposed sidewalk along Riverside Drive. There are no wildfire hazards on the property. The area is in a debris fan geological hazard and any future buildings will need engineered foundations. The wetland habitat on the property have been delineated by Celine LeBeau, Van Horn Engineering. Approximately 0.94 acres ofjurisdictional wetland habitat was delineated on site. In accordance with the EVDC, most ofthe wetland habitat is proposed as Outlots A, B, and C. Wetland restoration of upland areas is proposed within the delineated wetland habitat in exchange for wetland habitat extremities that are of lower quality than the interior habitat. The proposed boundary and associated restoration of the wetland habitat creates a more contiguous wetland habitat, which increases the overall function, quality, and value of the wetland. A summary report describing the proposed restoration and outlot formation is included in the submittal packet. The formation of the three outlots was dependent on the delineated wetland boundary and the lot size of Lots 1 and 2. The sizes of Lots 1 and 2 are the minimum lot size that could be approved via a request for a 25% variance (minor modification). Due to slope restrictions, delineated wetland habitat, desired re-zoning (E-Estate-0.5 acre) and existing structures, a minor modification will be requested for the lot sizes of Lots 1 and 2. Drainage on the property is generally south to north into the Big Thompson River. There is a small pond on the property that acts as a water quality feature together with the grassy swales and wetland area. There is a considerable off-site area that drains through the property. With this, there is erosion and sedimentation on the site from the off-site flows. The Preliminary Drainage Report indicates that the culvert crossing Riverside Drive is undersized for the basin it conveys flow for. There is a proposal for a second Riverside Drive culvert north of the existing culvert. This second culvert will help share the burden of conveying stormwater under Riverside Drive. Curb, gutter, and walk is proposed along the northern side of Riverside Drive. Ditch deepening and definition will be necessary to direct flows on the southern side of Riverside Drive to the culvert(s). The curb will require limited capacity if the southern maintenance measures are provided. On-site drainage was not detailed in the report. This is left to specific development that may occur on the site lot(s) in the future. Two drainage easements are indicated and shown to be dedicated on the plat. These drainage easements line up with the cross culvert(s) and outlet into the wetlands, drainage easement. Pedestrian access will be improved with this subdivision. A sidewalk and curb and gutter will be installed along the north side of Riverside Drive and a 25' non-motorized pedestrian access easement is proposed along the south bank of the Big Thomson River. A private pedestrian access easement was suggested for Lots 1 and 2, however, the alignment for this easement would fragment the already fragmented wetland habitat. A pedestrian trail through the wetland habitat would encourage trampling of wetland vegetation and disturbance to wildlife utilizing the private wetland pocket for forage, shelter, and/or birthing. There are two waivers that are requested with this submittal. The plan is prepared at a scale of 1"=30' not 1"=20' per the Appendix B submittal requirements. The second is a waiver to the setback of a drive from the street right of way. The current driveway and parking area is in the right of way by as much as 3'. We are proposing to remove all portions of the driveway and parking areas from the right of way and keep them 3' from the right-of-way line. The buildings and driveways are historic and closer to the road than a typical house thereby making it difficult to meet the setback requirements of a driveway and parking area. The topography of the property makes it even more difficult to move the drive around the buildings. if ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATI~)~~ AUG 2 2 2007 ~ Submittal Date: r Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map r Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map ,R- Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change 1- Final Map R' Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat F Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat F Amended Plat General Information Project Name Kni,&&164- ANNEINTIDN Project Description PRS.,MiN#lai SU P,DI V 151Ord /RE<ZoN,Allr Project Address 974; lp,0.s.-1~ 1<IVE~V225~nE bkVE *e Legal Description Lot- 2 SwAA,Mr UJU..~ Â£.cad_ A:Ui tr- Parcel ID# 3â‚¬95-1-05 -009- Section 55- Township Erl Range 3-8 W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 2. (o: Existing Land Use Â£â‚¬SiAAAÂ·k Â£ l Proposed Land Use 2Â£51 Â£1 ea,li â€¢. 4 Aul 400*194..b.M & Existing Water Service R'rown F Well F other (Specify) Proposed Water Service Krown r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD X' UTSD r septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD ~ UTSD F Septic Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes ~2 No Existing Gas Service r xcel K Other F None Existing Zoning An.~NUL~ Rakh'Â·S Proposed Zoning Â£14-4,1 ~4â‚¬a>.tnia,Wan f Site Access (if not on public street) Eat Â¢iuÂ°*0\ 42- brire- Are there wetlands on the site? K Yes E No Has site staking been completed? E Yes PK No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person (DE 1 c . Â£.Â· Leaza,u- Mailing Address Attachments K Application fee r Statement of intent r 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan r 11"X 17"reducedcopyof platorplan K Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 + www.estesnet.com/ComDev Type of Application C r Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant .K consultanVEngineer Record Owner(s) DA\Â£ 1 O, UAS-61 -2- KÂ©Sf-LO 1.-.E. Mailing Address 39-5- Ecut, Ri virb,14* Aft vi; ,â‚¬0;k a Â¢2Â£Â«, Lo; 605-71-- Phone Age â‚¬19&- 0514 Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant \kn Un C A En.jihitri 1/La J CE( i Dv_. LEB,BAL Mailing Address |0142, P'(5,k Cretaâ€¢- 12-Dâ€¢JA, E,kgo A.<4 60 Â¥9091 1-- Phone (419) 684, -12>648 Cell Phone Fax (ftw) 58(0 - 8 10 1 Email VU/.tal (10 Q 15, COYn Consultant/Engineer 10 Â£ th.1 (,65Â¢kux_ , \/d,h 4-lorn 45(A.~-,ALL r; 94.- Mailing Address {0,-18 F-C64 Cre.,-4 ROOL-eL 2661'.i PA.rÂ¥(0 80:519- Phone (RAD) 996 48â‚¬5 X 14 Cell Phone Fax (_4Â¥) 513 (0- 6 (01 ~ E(CEO VEE Email ee.li.t,/1,2-2 alvloiÂ·Â·h, corn F,1 A11(1 9 9 2007 1 It ~,2/ JU APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and ewteieleÂ·*ev-Hmitr See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINTÂ· Dje-*- Cl-tts kwelo tal Applicant PLEASE PRINT: ~t-(146. Le,8.Ca-LL Signatures: Record Owner /UE,~ ~4*2 (36Ekku,Lek Date 8/24107 Applicant Date Contactlnformation f 01 - 0. 11- 4 Primary Contact Person is S Owner r Applicant 35< Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) bai e. 1 0,9,vi sti K,- KÂ©Se.,5 1 L E Mailing Address 395- 13Â©t Ri vga-â€ž1.,- bt, 4Â·e,1 0Â£40Â£3 Â¢4Â«. Lo. 605-72 Phone Age 69&- 0514 Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant *UA Unr n El,11~ 'M.ri IAc~ 1 654 4,- LE.B<. 1 1 Mailing Address | D 418 f:( 5, k Crl:â‚¬*- i-D .CA.,taÂ·wth AL<k, 602 80511- Phone @W) 586 -956% Cell Phone Fax ~'160 58(0 - 0 10 1 Email VUF.tal <10& ti . Corn ConsultanVEngineer (0 Elike- Le,19Â£.i._ , \/d,h 4.lorn lAA:~1-.Â£.,,rim,1 Mailing Address {D'-12> 9-064 Cre-Â£1,- IEÂ©m-Â®L JEs*.9 A r~-20 ec):514- Phone (qua) 99 6 -caâ‚¬ E X [9 Cell Phone Fax (_4Â¥) 58(0- 8 (01 pIEÂ©EDVE,3' Email ece.Â¢.dke Â£ alv 6645. co<M Al SEP - , 2007 ' b APPLICATION FEES J U .2/ For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 1 le * d cl5 /64 e u.9 < cl Applicant PLEASE PR//VT.Â· Â£~ <~ 1 4 6- Lâ‚¬,8 Â·ca-(A- ignatures: ~ Record Owne~~â‚¬~ 46;azz /3 (fikku,o~4JL Date 8/11107 Applicant Date 8/ 2,2-low An-360-- K C APPLICANT CERTIFICATION h I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). * I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) I I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. * I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. 4 The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: 1 ' 1/ Record Owner .PLEASE PRINT: TDA(t4 Ckr 1 5 7605.u),od Applicant PLEASE PRINT: ~ E lch. e. L e.&.ecuâ€¢â€¢- Signatures: Record Owner <Eu )64 CA.Ag 21.- ode 8/4_~ ~07 Applicant Date .@ EÂ©ED V-*F ~ AUG 2 2 2007 1 -~ Revised 10/13/06 < APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. * In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). * I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWDevCode.) * I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. # I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: 1\ i el- filt Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 47#la--# L.#trt 5 KOSâ‚¬-4),c-Â·1_ Applicant PLEASE PRINT- g 6 1,-~ 2.- Le.8.6~64~ " Signatures: . P c>\01) - / Record Owner Lrucef rDOQ007*86 C fLU lk- Date 81&-1 t07 Date S/,2-'2.f o Ch Applicant ~ ~ SEP -5 2007 1 Revised 10/13/06 F f h A 1 h ZE ~Shil 83%22 % 5 000(000@08 NOO<0.JOUOU 0 62â‚¬622â‚¬20â‚¬82 - 355'06506*006 (0 C 0**#%%%22%#%8â‚¬5% 6 LU LLI < U.1 6 U.1 -D O W J UJ O. LU _1 U.1 LU LU R 0 0 E E f 1 2 0 2 83 & v-Ma 3: bÂ® Â® m lw13%4*Â¢~g 2%:go,N 2&% 5280.T ; ~t KI~21 2 56.9259526:(6255 o Ioocou)00*00 1.0 4- 1-1- 00 00 2Â§%2@2992Â§2@Â§@@22 6 ~6 0 -mo e U) 1% 060*506c v m %0 01 20 g : il 11 1# ir z 13 fr 4% 1 4# 0 0 Ok- S SI CO06 m =51Â£ Or is & Carol Brown Box 3222 O 8051 ra Ha 80534 126-4675 80517 Barbara Mick O 80517 a CA 91103 r~~txiclnSchmidt itE~%2517 Roger Steketee e Drive ark, CO 80517 stes Park, CO 80517 ~~~~IZaanmcbh~EP, LLC nglewood, CO 80150-1221 a Brown Deanna Bleyle Moraine Avenue as Choate Kenwood Circl 1 & Kristi Christopher Box 2100 wner Owner 11 Address Buluozebl 9 uois!Aipqns eld MO!AAeSO>1 of Estes Valley, Inc. ichael Thomas Iste Donald & Jeanne Smith Pre LiTTLinary Plat of the Koseluick Sub division S 7T42' TRACT 1, KOSEWICK ANNEXATION, NE W OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST, OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 2141 @\ 025911 ~ A/C 29415 1.3 11 l pORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTIÂ©N 35, PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION (TAKEN FROM TRANSNATION TITLE COMMITMENT NUMBER 01'i EAST eTH CORNER SECTION 26/35, / FOUND 216" U.S.G.L.0. BR*S CAP Z i - FOUN 34- BRASS CAP ON A 26" PIPE, S89-19'43"E 1339.78' 61-0001988, DATED JULY 19, 2007): 6a~M- i STAM ED 1996 PLS 15760 [589'22'00"E 1340.16')] ~ ON A 2" PIPE, STAM~D 1925 -~ THAT PART OF LOT 7, SUMMER VILLA, LYING WEST AND NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD AS NOW LOCATED /-4\ ti \Â»Â® /4 9 l 1 17(_sao.1 43"E 5.00' AND RUNNING THRU SAID SUBDIVISION, AS EXISTED ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1920, EXCEPT THAT . (WEST 5.00') LT1 PORTION CONVEYED TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, / 3 3 1 1 11 t 1948 IN BOOK 861 AT PAGE 34 AND DECEMBER 29, 1976 IN BOOK 1741 AT PAGE 701 AND 1 nn *1 1~1 4.. OF THE AM NDED PLAT 0 EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO AMOS G. JOHNSON AND DORIS JEAN JOHNSON BY DEE ww #ll,ll\. THE T MBERLANE RECORDED JANUARY 6, 1977 IN BOOK 1743 AT PAGE 50, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF Nk 1111111% SUB IVISION COLORADO FE 11111111\ FOUND PARCE #3526414001 00 #4 REBAR - PROPOSED BURIED 5. 7 ACRES WRNESS CORNER-~(- ELECTRIC-4Â» CONDUIT N:'lld Z NED A FROM EXISTING PEDESTAL SURVEYOR' S NOTESÂ· >kt . /8.06'2 0, 4, 51.46, / ANNEXED TO HE TOWN OF ESTE 1. LANDAMERICA TITLE COMMITMENT NUMBER 61-0001988 AND PREVIOUS VAN HORN . l l Pti -- (BROOKSI E ANNEXATION) *v ts 7742'~ E 199.95 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING PROJECTS WERE USED FOR OWNERSHIP AND EASEMENT : Â¢ 9 4.0 1 Â· 4.89 E 233.45,; RESEARCH. NO OTHER OWNERSHIP RESEARCH WAS PERFORMED. 189' // 1\ Â£18 *90 [2 7734'3. 11[?1 + 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE BASED ON P/C 15760 (THE NORTHEAST , ~, , ji. 1 10' FIRE HYDRANT P/C 9485 PROPERTY CORNER) WITH AN ELEVATION OF 8000'. EXISTING ' 1 '. J 1.' \ Â¥- 4, 1 UTILITY EASEMENT 125' NORTH 22:7,6, -. '-+47-th~<1_Ar- 1242~27: 5 *.4 3. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON \' -J.-2-2 % 12" CMP CD ./ - 4 - o EXISTING DRIVE ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS OF THE DATE YOU FIRST DISCOVER FOUND AND PARKING 4*IP. .444 --44 \39%2%'V -1. 1>4--C?~.3'28'~~\46 /~~~~-~- - \ P/C 15 . t, SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE CERTIFICATION DATE SHOWN 1 1 ./. -74. I PROPOSED HEREON. \ WATER LINE Iinell /9 #~SESC-2<23*<t,Lk#/ 3 49~ j .--17-1=> 2- S ' : PROPOSED 25' LOT 1 BEARING STATEMENT: TRAIL EASEMENT n/9 10 \ 11 Â»A b/ Â·.-ge- 1 : PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT BROWN &2 4. / -7- '-POND Â¤ 23.14 \$110<*4 'i> ~ 4, 1 Â£ 4 # , Â·; ~991. . 1\ BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH BEARS lWFOUND~ Â·Â·I- iT * 1...l. / 7, -- - FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 N01*48'48"E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1311.29% MONUMENTED AT EACH END BY & CORNER 1 ' PIPE ~ | %-L-8, '2,22)T-A- - 1m-mzo - ~ ~ ~ ~ I 'Â·' U.câ‚¬.0 : t 30' R-0-W FROM CENTERLINE SUBDIVISION BRASS CAPS DEDICATED IN PARCEL#35351-37-001 \ \PRO O D LWT 4,/E. 1 7. 7 RECEPTION NO. 177292 (EAST 113 CORNER TO NORTHEAST 1~3 CORNER). - g;; Â·I /, -0.19-ACRE.8,477.SF - - .-ull Â·Â·~ - ~ 1 1 \ 0.37'~A 1.1 * BOOK 1741 PAGE 701 1.25 ACRES triton -- k k .1.4 L ,-===Lt=2Ar,E ... -\-\\ S\\ \~(Â°i~ 0 ~ 41STING HO BROWN, DENNIS K/CAROL A ZONED E-1 PROJECT INFORMATION TABLE CENTERLINE 15' WIDE I . 'VE' 4 il DEC ' 2, \ \[ 903 PROSPECT PARK DR BOOK =RP=Eoin G ./ //-- .,1 lk 32 2 2 2 4.Â· - - - ' ~ KI n 5 1\ , 9 2Â© ESTES PARK 80517 GROSS AREA: 113,692 S.F. = 2.61 ACRES ZONING: CURRENTLY A ACCOMMODATIONS pA-OUT-ST TO REZONE LOTS 1 AND 2 TO E ESTATE - . ' 11, .. A., . A- ~--.I-1- . . - . I 350 36 00 6 10.Z. ... ..v--1 N Ad Ulll 0 4 LOf 5 TO REMAIN A-ACCOMMODATIONS ZONING (S55'36'08"W 6.00') , . . . V. . . . . BUILDING SETBACKS IN E: FRONT- 15' SIDE- 10' MANOR RV '~ . - * ~*~ D-~* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l.2~8 ~ - l.rLAI,~~N~~US.'r- ~~ ~ ~:~j - \S\ te ES 1 I , "W OSED 5' WIDE REAR- 15' PROPERTY 0 1 \ . /: :- .. W .' ... 11\ ATTACHED SIDEWALK 1Â¥1 F ..1 9 \.9 4 1*/Â«.t.%. ..~. , 1 " IPE I \ BUILDING SETBACKS IN A: FRONT- 15' PARCEL#3535100003 SIDE- 15' 5.87 ACRES 19*~ " . . 1 F 1 '.h i Ll o\Af> .3 1/1 i \..... 6.7 ..: REAR- 10' ZONED A EXIS ING - TRACT -1 --'-*----.-9 . -\-\ 41\. r , 1,0 E ING HO Â·'Â· ~ ,Â·+..4 4 PROPOSED ACCESS AND PARKING AREA FOR LOT 2 KOSE CK ANNEXATION .-..-- . . 9104 \ 10 PROPOSED LOT AREAS: LOT 1: 16,127 S.F. (0.37 ACRE) 1 1 '\ 9 PARC L#35351-05-007 . . . . Â·Â·1Â· -t 14- 0 1 0 0. \'CK A /44~il.~10 , 1it; LOT 2: 16,307 S.F. (0.37 ACRE) . . . . . .2.61 ACRES - . - 00 333 ' Ff (-1 1 2 LOT 8B LOT 3. 48,373 S.F. (1.11 ACRES) v I \ 1% f - , lek SUMMER VILLA OUTLOT A: 8,477 S.F. (0.19 ACRE) 9.4. Â· - ZONED A t\ / 1 ' Â· - -t,up \\ 41 1 \* H e PARCEL#35351-14-002 OUTLOT B: 7,532 S.F. (0.17 ACRE) -2, \t OUTLOT C: 17,568 S.F. (0.40 ACRE) - 444 -..- ---~C5L2USS Nj -\ 1 . *L ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ \ 16" 0 0.78 ACRE \ 1 , m ZONED E-1 &....-.... CHOATE, THOMAS S SLOPE TABLES FOR EACH PROPOSED LOT: 6 \ a Â£ 911 PROSPECT PARK DR NON-B ABLE ~ <3*< ~~- DRAINAGE , .-,~~ Â©\~ . 0.37 1CRE 16,367 SF \ 1 ~ ~ \ 1 ESTES PARK 80517 SLOPE PERCENTAGES -AND D AGE EASEMENT _.---Â·-7Â£Â· . EASEMENT g , ~, 4 -\ f - N \ - \-\ 4.63\ (O-54 ACRE 23 83~4 SFf N.11 (~A.#3'Â· Â· ~---LtÂ« u ~~- Â·pr\*b %\ EAS T PROPOSED SLOPE RANGE LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 16 -3 'N <Tr661 Rj % .4 \ FIRE HYDRANT - 07- 4 Q,.- - 1*.-4. v ..2 -\>t\:91~ . r --- c SOUTHEASTERLY R-0-W 0% - 20% 80.2% 79.0% 75.3% - - 4 Â· b ---- -*.* (RIVERSIDE DRIVE) \ + rl'.219 : ,- L;37-// ....}../ t\\.9.6 /11/29 ~ 0 ~~\ LE : /:17. 1 \\~ r 20% - 25% 4.7% 4.5% 9.2% ... ........\.1 / \ 25% - 30% 4.2% 6.6% 4.5% 43 \ i .4>4, 30% - 40% 4.3% 3.9% 4.17 a b) 4 - - . A . j . 1 ......'.~>itioÂ¢\ \?4.j \ \ 1./.~ 4~ -3 @ Mc\11 40% - 100% 6.6% 6.0% 6.9% 00 .- I- bo . .. .. 20%'. \ ~ 15 .... . : Â» 10' . Boto E $ m "- -- ~( ~= >t. - â€ž- = ~~ Ry9109 SF. - . - ... - . - . - - ... - . - . - '~2~.%.3 '~ ~ EÂ«flÂ·~ 1 ~ 6.~ RoposED 20' ~ . .'. ~~~ ~ f o AVERAGE 14.0% 13.7% 16.7% Rww GAPHE\- 09\ 1 6/ A DANNAGE ':sj ~./ . \ ~ 15 9 NON BUILDABLE Â·...9-.-2-41-<.WRA:El,# V/\ AÂ»=2-5 900 1 EXISTING WETLAND HABITAT WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARIES IS AS SHOWN 1,- 6 6 -9 W UTILITY AND RAINAGE EASEMENT PORTIONS OF PROPOSED LOTS 1 AND 2 ARE IN A DEBRIS FAN 0 *y 9 6 - -. . 1--4...~~, 4 . â€ž . Â· 1847 SF :,1 .%\ ./ ii*ejiAl 1 Tvur i 1% 3 ./ 253' EAST ty@osPECT FIRE -IYDRANT THIS PROPERTY IS NOT IN ANY RIDGELINE PROTECTION AREA !04?% 6 25 --. ~- - ' ~3744? -3 & ... 1 ......./7 -\./ \ \/ \ 1 \\\\1' , THIS PROPERTY IS NOT IN ANY MAPPED WILDFIRE HAZARD AREA 03 . . &506 I j \ 10' ~ PROPOSED AREA OF . ... XMkdta27--rw-t7 UT LITY UTILITIES: ZE ... EASEMENT M CREATED/RESTORED ,Â·3 1 , 7 ' ~ - ' - WETLAND HABITAT TO ' 2,. ~ 25 KVA -Â·Â·--Â·7:...._..3 .~bROPOSED--s~~-~~7:k~~20*---~-1- 1 - ./ 1 - - * - ,>'= INCREASE WETLAND - - - - ' . I -6-4 V*trit#23- TRANSFORMER . $ / 3/0-4 SEWER: AN EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT CROSSES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN. \ -/i. * Â· -~ Â·FUNCTION AND . - ./, P 1 4 - . CONTIGUITY . . . . f ,/ V OF LOT 3 : ,// SEWER SERVICE LINES WILL EXTEND FROM THE EXISTING SEWER LINE WITHIN THE /' 9 PROPOSED WETLAND TO 1/~ / / UPON DEVELOPMENT' / 74 -- --,-- -r-~Lrt // EASEMENT. . 47. - ./ .1 - . .. ~ j .1 'I / mi' 4 -- 1,Ow-f-~ BE EXCLUDED FROM / // ' \ 8. A. Vt ./ f OUTLOT IN EXCHANGE /// / / 18" I \ WATER: EXISTING WATER LINES WILL BE ABANDONED. A NEW WATER MAIN WILL EXTEND 00 -4,32 ..t/.... 0 FOR RESTORATION OF /Ef UPLAND INCLUSIONS #' 3 19 FROMTHE WATER MAIN IN EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE, EAST OF THE WORLDMARK PROPERTY, NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE MAIN WILL CONTINUE ALONG THE ROAD, WITHIN ' WITHIN OUTLOT (1587 SO THE EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND END AT A FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED ~ l :Â·10~ 3 1,257 SF Â·" ' LA6 PROPO Â°13 1 APPROXIMATELY AT THE LOT 2/LOT 3 EASTERN PROPERTY CORNER AS SHOWN. ~ - ~ : k,&rÂ· 4 x, .4>*~' ~ , (CONTAINS DRAINAGE SWALE) . ' ~'- '1~I' 4 0 ,-1 ~\ *~,6 4 / DRAINAGE EASEM - :P. r \\:. 2*1420" .\ 4 \ , ELECTRIC: EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES WILL BE ABANDONED AND NEW BURIED ~ ' 11 7 ,-A ~~' LOT 4 PRIMARY ELECTRIC LINES WILL BE INSTALLED. PRIMARY ELECTRIC WILL BEGIN AT THE 2% ' 1/ 09\Â·41 lie 0.10 Im / SUMMER VILLA TRANSFORMER LOCATED NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND CONTINUE THROUGH . / oÂ«42 Irier,AL \ 1,/42 SUBDIVISION THE PROPERTY ALONG THE EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT. PRIMARY CONDUIT WILL BE 3" . . . - I . - ... ./.\ IN DIAMETER AND 4' DEEP WITH CAUTION TAPE AT A DEPTH OF 2'. A 25 KVC 1 59 3.94 ACRES PARCEL#35351-05-004 TRANSFORMER WILL BE INSTALLED CENTRALLY TO SERVICE ALL THREE LOTS AS SHOWN. PROPOSEP ~WETLAND TO ~ \~ ~, ~ BROWN, GLENDA J SECONDARY ELECTRIC LINES WILL BE 2' DEEP WITH CAUTION TAPE AT A DEPTH OF 1'. BE KXCLUDED FROM ZONED RE \ OUTLOT IN EXCHANGE \1 / / \ ' 7/\ BLEYLE, DEANNA M GAS: AN EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTS WITHIN THE EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY ~4\3\... Al. FOR RESTORATION OF -/ , Â· 'C * Cl u., 2 j UPLAND INCLUSIONS 1/ , '.7 1 94 *ITHIN OUTLOT (2880 SO 15" 9- : \1 , 790 E RIVERSIDE DR AS SHOWN. THE CURRENT RESIDENCES ON THE PROPERTY USE AN ABOVEGROUND 0 0 2Â· ~' Â· ESTES PARK, CO 80517 PROPANE TANK AS A GAS SOURCE (AS SHOWN). NEW GAS LINES WILL BE INSTALLED . / UPON DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 3. THE NEW LINES WILL CONNECT WITH THE EXISTING GAS \,/ Â» \ , 44/ . / 7> / 15" \ , \1.'' \ ~/ / 4- 3 LINE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. , , r /6- / L \' r \ / 1 . .1 I il.11 S 48,373 SF ACRES 65,691 SF}_ -' g./ Â£\\ 7 \ /04/16, , L42 L43 K ZONED A ! ... POTENTIAL ACCESS TO LOT..3 /4/ SUBDIVISION NOTESÂ·. 1. OUTLOTS ACREAGE IS USED FOR DENSITY CALCULATIONS OF LOTS 1,2 AND 3. 10' 2 / 1/36% i V L/z_ ./-Â·'vn>/ <-tht.~=--, 4 ' ~EXISTING ~-18" CM ET 1 r nu.x i Lk o Â·-Â·49 0 469 - 2. MAXIMUM DENSITY IS NOT GAURANTEED. THE NUMBER OF DWELLING OR UTIL 1 2 L--AL ACCOMMODATION UNITS ALLOWED IS ALSO BASED ON ALL OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS 1 152 -52 U'.i >- > / ,@'. , '' < ,! .C 1 , 2 -VY IGHT - - -~ IN THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE. 7 + vi -ev *=,1 - , -.:I .4./ DISTANCE r 'vvn /* : ,- s-~/ ' if- 0 / NORTHEASTERL 3. WETLAND HABITAT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND -Â·-1--- 1'- 2/62"P 0 1-1,n A -' /\ A.:AN. 4 0 STANDARDS OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 7, SECTION 7.6 OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT ---~---- --1214*0*74/1 74-/ \ME:&â€¢~3 /~1/ LOT 5 annF .1 /(A/*Ab-- r 19 /6\.se SUMMER VILLA ///hst- 10.- Â·Â·590~*fith&4-- 'c ./3.0,Â·- CS ANCE SUBDIVISION LINE TABLE a \. 9..3 ./ .... 72 0 333*r. 1FG'. PARCEL#35351-05-011 LINE LENGTH BEARING ~---12,7 -- -<~w-IV~g- 5/> 3.25 ACRES Ll 8,31 S70Â°40'51'W --1 , ZONED RE Â·ge -/ r. ELSTE, MICHAEL/THOMAS L2 41,05 S13Â°49'00'E SOUTHWESTERLY 800 E RIVERSIDE DR L3 20,35 S17*59'12'E . 4, / L8 22,81 S18Â°41'54'E 28" ~ ~ - -~ ~~ f LOT 5 ESTES PARK 80517 "/--~1 _ffle _--~~ L9 72,91 S70Â°43'35'W 2 0, ~ f 047: -OF ,<. 9. SUMMER VILLA SUBDIVISION L10 28.92 N84Â°10'03'W , "* 1â‚¬ / PARCEL#35351-05-005 Llt 59.92 N14Â°45'43'7 2.04 ACRES bâ€¢ L12 23.79 N27*42'10'W ZONED RE 4*) / PR SED 5' WIDE L13 27,11 N50*00'42'W / ACHED SIDEWALK ISHAM, CINDY M AND MARK D L14 22,27 N73Â°45'20'W FOUND 806 E RIVERSIDE DR #4 REBAR A ESTES PARK, CO 80517 L15 50.77 S29Â°05'15'W L16 28.07 N88*20'00'W L17 85.41 N01Â°52'49'E 3 L18 199.95 S77*42'45'E EG k LOT 6 R~ 2 L27 44,55 502Â°02'23'W Med N SUMMER VILLA L28 123,67 N83'13'40'W 155 2 SUBDIVISION LEGEND L29 33,56 S43*27'38'W E PARCEL#35351-05-006 L30 44.62 S76*29'53'W 0 2.71 ACRES LL L31 31.19 SolÂ°23'54'E 20 ZONED RE MAJOR 10' INTERVAL) CONTOURS ,Â¢' POWER POLE 19 3 LOGAN, RUTH J L32 35.19 S48*40'01'E 01 O MINOR ( ' INTERVAL) CONTOURS ~ ELECTRIC PEDESTAL/C INET 816 E RIVERSIDE DR L33 111.46 S83*01'14'E L34 64.58 N70Â°57'46'E ESTES PARK, CO 80517 EASEMENT Â£ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER L35 108.53 N18*41'544/ " EASEMENT ENTERLINE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL/CABIN L36 93.24 S01*48'47'W L37 87.11 983*01'14'E , e WATER VALVE , NORTHEAST 1/16 C~RNER OF SECTION <35, ~Â· ~ - SIDEWALK L38 229,25 S01Â°44'40'W U FIRE HYDRANT FOUND 3 1~2" BRASS *P L39 29.58 S18Â°41'53'E ON A 2 1/21' PIPE, STAM~PED ~ r ...t.--7.1 Â® MANHOLE L40 188.87 S61*58'44'W I I WETLAND HABITAT 1996 Â¢LS 15760 -s- SEWER UNE L41 104,42 N01Â°48'48'E 410.97' L42 12,37 N89*53'00'E WETLAND HABITAT T BE EXCHANGED -OHE- OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE L43 17,94 N81Â°14'41'E t,..,.1.-2.j FOR RESTORED HABI AT -UP- PROPOSED BURIED ELECTRIC LINE L44 73.16 N01Â°48'48'E i '>'~ .i UPLAND HABITAT TO BE RESTORED TO L45 25.30 N53*41'43'E L........2.-..1 WETLAND HABITAT -W WATER LINE L46 32.72 N55Â°53'30'E /4 /4 D- 0-1. ROCK OUTCROPPING L47 50.96 N52Â°08'04'E ~7 ~1Â« lk--tur - GAS - GAS LINE 114)51 C FENCE LINE L48 44,66 N18*32'00'E 1-71 1 L49 22,43 N42Â°18'45'E 00.00 MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS -v-v-~ TREE/SHRUB LINE L50 17.15 N51*34'30'E PLATrED DIMENSIONS FROM PLAT ~! EXISTING PONDEROSA PINE (WITH L51 41.53 S83*01'14'E [00.00] IN BOOK 1739 PAGE 990 DBH NOTED) L52 64.58 N70*57'46'E L53 12.74 IN (00.00) DEEDED DIMENS10NS FRoM BooK O F0UND M0NUMENTATI0N S19Â°01'10'E 1741 PAGE 0701 Â® ALIQUOT MONUMENTATION L55 11.87 Sl 9*01'10' E L56 107.18 914Â°56'00'E L57 61.47 627*52'40'E bITE 1 ~14 EASEMENT CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD 1 < - - Cl 71.94' 83.68' 49 15'21" N43'15'00"E 69.74' SCALE: 1" = 30' 11 JE----111 111 0 30 60 90 VICINITY MAP OWNER AND APPLICANT: SCALE: 1" = 660' DALE AND CHRISTINE KOSEWICK ~---_OCT10_I_3 ~ 775 RIVERSIDE DRIVE ~ UL____jU ESTES PARK, CO 80517 VAN HORN ENGINEERING CONTAC CELINE LEBEAU 0 0 0 0 0 y SHEET :69/ .0- DATE REVISION BY I Â»OI m [3 !:, ER i m 0 0 KOSEWICK SUBDIVISION -Â£,24"~Â¥*4 -0/. - CD 3 --.. PROJECT -1 0 775 RIVERSIDE DRIVE ,%~*P.. . 0 ~ 52 11- 4 k lili ~\~ VAN HORN ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 7 g O r O -1 ESTES PARK, COLORADO m, m, 1043 FISH CREEK RD * ESTES PARK COLORADO 80517 PHONE: (970) 586-9388 * FAX: (970) 586-8101 1 111111, GRAVEL ROAD -ON -rOZId IE-LO-9002 ./ 111 ./. 1 6- L.Â·' L W 1 ~ %6- KOSEWICK SUBDIVISION, REMOVE END CAP AND WATERLINE AND SIDEWALK CURB 199.95' CONSTRUCTION NOTES: / CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" MAIN 33.45'1 A. 1. AS-BUILTS FOR WATERLINE TO BE SUBMITTED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AND GUTTER DETAILS DOCUMENTING CHANGES AND PROVIDING THAT INFORMATION TO VAN HORN ENGINEERING FOR CREATION OF THE ASBUILT DRAWING. 2. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN WERE LOCATED BY UTILITY PROVIDERS AND WERE SHOT tN THE FIELD. NO DEPTHS ARE KNOWN. MORE 0," E 148 - 10' DETAILED LOCATES MAY BE POSSIBLE AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY E 14.49' BUILDING SETBACK + IRE HYDRANT WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES THE LOCATION OF THE UTILIrf LINES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO RELOCATE THE LINES, IF /.98,] D UTILITY EASEMED6 125' NORTH TRACT 1, KOS EWICK ANNEXATION TO DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE SEPARATE UTILITY ENTITIES. / 3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILIrf OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT AND/OR RESTORE ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ENCOUNTERED DURING 0 - 4 EXISTING DRIVE THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, CO. CONSTRUCTION. ALSO, DRIVEWAYS THAT ARE DISTURBED MUST BE RECLAIMED WITH THE SAME SURFACING THAT EXISTED PRIOR TO X :. '90.4 FOUN,6 0 AND PARKING CONSTRUCTION. 8"440*1' g~t 4- - Pkd,157 4. NO TREES SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT FIRST CONTACTING THE PROPERNS OWNER. - h <231> -- 1 , 6OJE.-: i.% -i\.-4-113/ 15' n 5. ALL WATER MAIN LINES SHALL BE 8" DUCTILE IRON PIPE CLASS 52 WITH BONDED JOINTS. c )52< *Ef l</ PROPOSED WATER LINE ~~~IA~SPECM~FINCAT ~N~ F~R ~TER ~NU LNES AF~UND NTHE~a ~KWEATTEOWNUT~SPOUC~ARKAN~ATSETRANA~~RD~S*ES~NND ~~mf~re>1.-33Â·Â·<,*9'BUILDING .%Â©<.~<;,ID<..7%. SETBACK <----13.->Â·. ,~-, w.Â·-Â·S STANDARDS)" MANUAL. KI:i toty 440 N C ~Â· ., -tÂ·\\ r.0 Ma 7, THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES MUST BE FOLLOWED. FLOW FILL PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED ALONG RIVERSIDE DRIVE, HOWEVER, COMPACTION TESTING WILL BE REQUIRED PER THE CONSTRUCTION | | - MEGA LUG JOINTS AND/OR GUIDELINES. PAVEMENT PATCHING MUST BE PERFORMED PER THE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES. FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 1 1 .1 RESTRAINED JOINTS 00 O 7. ALL VALVES IN PAVEMENT WILL BE )6" BELOW FINISHED ASPHALT. 1 30' R-0-W EASEMENT DEDICATED IN ~0: V, E E 8. BENCH MARK IS THE NORTHEAST LOT CORNER, ASSUMED TO BE 8000 FEET. PROPOSED LOT ~<-1-1 \' .. Â·4 - RECEPTION NO. 177292 0- 0.37 ACRAA 18,127 SF \\ 8 BOOK 1741 PAGE 701 ZR n \I Â° < .8 (0.56 Adi**AS SF) + **1Â¢ED I~- EXISTING HOUS,&7' F ~ N e a. & Eli . J. 4 \ LBOND BREAKER 4 3 /~ 2445 t< 4 .t...\ TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE r ~ 4 ~- ~ ~ b-BEARING SURFACE /84*2/ m g .\ /gaik~* -Pr- A t--07\ \ CP APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF ESTES PARK, '1 4%8*2*2*23%%224~ 2Â£0#m/1 *L4 \ COLORADO THIS DAY OF , 200-7. \ 1 1530'3\\ \-lk---M--~5- ly'~ ~'i ~ UCONCRETE BLOCKING \ 3/ O 70 , --\33~â€žÂ·i/ Â¢8#- \BerÂ· A.1, SCALE: 1" = 20' D\ (3 , IEE >WIAAW'~6 lt, ) -1. Z.T~tÂ· ~ UNDISTURBED SOIL TOWN ENGINEER LONNIE A. SHELDON, COLO. P.E.# 26974 \ 0 20 40 60 NO SCALE TAKF-OFFS; 0 0/ OrÂ«%/ 31/ 0 rk'r -FBE z 11 PROPOSED 5' WIDE 4 ATTACHED SIDEWALK 0 195 LF 8" DIP WATERLINE .' - 4 / I Â»ey z 1 HYDRANT ASSEMBUES ) Fo / I 1 8"90' BEND 9 -- ~ 9â‚¬24 4 0 1 '141% f 3 r1 ~ CP. C~ E STING HO ~ E' Â·' Â¢.Â· 4 4 -t PROPOSED ACCESS AND Jit <31 \ -1 -S PARKING AREA FOR LOT 2 10" .\....\ \3 - r 1 1 7 4.6 -4 - 3.0'- 0, CK + -3 Â£ f A f 32" <91 1 \\ 1 \ 0* - 0 15' ~ HYDRANT- J) 4 BUILDING 16" J -/ PROPOSED WATER MAIN 40 L. C (IN ) p \ rr \O S - - I. -3--8- :45â‚¬5~â‚¬gESâ‚¬545â‚¬5~45â‚¬50* VALVE BOX n \Â·# 7 4 ~-> / 4-\414 0 f \\ 10'.Af-/1 f</ y JzeÂ«7 \\ \0\\ PROPOS]*DCLOT 2 20" \ BEARING SURFACE r- USE NATIVE FILL WHEN AVAILABLE 0.37 ACRE./16,307 SF I \ 1 9 INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY BOND BREAKER -22329 3 69\ / COMPACTED TO 95%, SUPPLY / CLASS 6 ROADBASE THEREAFTER .2.. 'f li\\2\ (0.54 ACRE 23,839 SF) \41 U I t. 7 . 24 DRESS SIDE WITH= 5, REZONED E EAS T PROPOSED TOP SOIL/SEED \ 4\ FIRE HYDRANT (TYP.) ~-SAWCUT AT EXISTING ASPHALT Â·01 1 r ~ + - | ' A: '4~ 5' MIN. / ALONG RIVERSIDE DRIVE .A I ' $ SOUTHEASTERLY R-O-W il . 4 30 - (RIVERSIDE DRIVE) -9 1/3 CU. YD.-, CONCRETE BLOCKING- - -,~~na~~~~s~F~z>p<~,+~*~~'~~PHALT-SEE TYPICAL .. ,\Â©ck\4 ~KICK BLOCK DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION 0" 9 COURSE GRAVEL~ 1% 4 3 2 Ul ./1 CONCRETE-1 L-SLOPE SIDEWALK TO ASPHALT 6" CCUPLING--1\\ UNDISTURBED SOIL-~------,/ SIDEWALK PROPERTY A/ to. -V'' 0 '0 4 A / \ K#- 39 â‚¬ 1& \C \.CGIFM. STANDARD SIDEWALK 43.N A A \ ti-127[- 44 9-</ v 0 +rl, 1,",.0: .DEAQ-END SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 6" GATE VALVE (22,12 NO SCALE CONCRETE - KICK BLOCK 4 3/4" RODS AND CLAMPS FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL 0' 0. NO SCALE G' G. -- -----i-- -I.\\\\\\\1 - 1 1 --K ' 1_ 1-Â£2'21 -1-"ASPRACT 8010 .Â«/ 'T) MAINTAIN 5' OF COVER REX / / L REINFORCE W/ #4 REBAR 30" O.C. BOTH WAYS ANRik //--MEGA LUG JOINTS AND/OR ~OPTIONAL GRADE / \Naf/ RESTRAINED JOINTS ING GROUND STANDARD CROSS f -f1,-- ~' ZI BOND BREAKER EXIST- PAN SECTION , A F BEARING SURFACE SCALE: 1' - 2'-0" -f.,. 3 74 -#Mmeh 1 1/2" r-1/4" RADIUS CONCRETE BLOCKING O 84 r 4 .a . d -\- 1 1" RADIUS n\_~ 6. - /FEXPANSION JOINT WITH CAULK P I *tltz-L / 1 " OUTFLOW OR INFLOW 4 ~ , DATUM ELEV UNDISTURBED SOIL- \ 8000.00 1/4" RADIUS ~ 6â€ž~ , .~ a.4- :,~ . 124 1 33.R.) 6. J PROPOSED WATER LINE PROFILE 11 1/4% 22 1/2. 45. AND 90' 24" 2 NO SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL SCALE, 1 " = 5' VERTICAL SCALE ; 3 DRAWN BY: - SUBBASE (95% COMPACTION)- 4 NOTE: NO DEPTHS OF UTILITY LINES ARE KNOWN. CHECKED BY: 9 MINIMUM PIPE RESTRAINT LENGTHS W/ THRUST BLOCKS LAS STANDARD TYPE 2 CURB 6 BENDS 1[al I - SCALE 7990 0 VALVE, 1"=20 AND GUTTER SECTION PIPE TEE OR DATE: 22 1/2' 2007-08-21 SIZE 11 1/4- 45' 90 DEAD END SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" w 6" 22 22 24 36 50 Z SHEET > N 0 ~ 8" 22 22 28 42 65 4 M 00 0 -01 1 go E - 1 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 MINIMUM BEARING SURFACE AREA (FTZ) 10 9 1 i PIPE BENDS TEE OR |~| - OF ELEVATIO MS ARE SIZE 11 1/4' 22 1/2 49 90' DEAD END EXISTING GRADE 6" 1.5 3.0 6.0 12.0 70 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 1 +89 8" 2.5 5.0 8.0 28.0 15.0 PROJ. NO. 2006-07-21 18 NOISIA3&1 SNIA3 0100 MUV 333&10 HS Â£,0 L \ 00 'NZIVd SlLSGI (OL6) 3NOHd GINrRINIVAL 'EIRS NOIALGIS NNV NOIALGISON 'I .LOVH 133HS 133rOHd KOSEWICK SUBDIVISION, ELECTRIC & COMMUNICATION LINES TRACT 1, KOSEWICK ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, CO. N l 0, i l 1 ~~EXISTING UTILITY POLE W/ , 34 OVERHEAD PRIMARY lili\ AND CABLE TO ~ EXISTING 30 THE SOUTHWEST X PRIMARY 1 %0? CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 1114 ./14- ,<'--CABINET SCALE: 1" = 20' 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS REPRESENTATIONAL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A LAND SURVEY PLAT NOR AN . 0 20 40 60 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT. 900 / h PROPOSED 1 + ELECTRIC Q~- 2. AS-BUILTS FOR ELECTRIC LINES TO BE SUBMITTED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS ' ~F- AND CABLE FEEDS -0 RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING CHANGES AND PROVIDING THAT INFORMATION TO VAN HORN ENGINEERING FOR Â· 0 =011 CREATION OF THE ASBUILT DRAWING. ..14 -1 1/ ~ Â»â‚¬0 SOUTH 2. UTILITIES ARE SCHEMATIC. THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHOULD BE LOCATED USING THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER -7---- . I- OF COLORADO AT 1 -800-922-1987 PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR LOCATION. Ab j -- Â£0 1 3. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT AND/OR RESTORE ALL PROPERTY CORNERS 4 EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL. ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALSO, DRIVEWAYS THAT ARE DISTURBED MUST BE RECLAIMED WITH THE SAME , + ,/7Â« ALL OTHER LINES TO THE SOUTH -7 4 i l SURFACING THAT EXISTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. =>*~ 1 Â«- ARE PROPOSED. ~ 4. NO TREES SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT FIRST CONTACTING THE PROPERTY'S OWNER. 5. ALL SECONDARY SERVICE LINES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ARE 2" SHEDULE 40 PVC FROM PEDESTAL OR 4* xzx -* 4y\\ ---- -- 40 1 ,Â» mw TRANSFORMER TO METER LOCATION. // -//22&36151\\ i \Al \ 5. SECONDARY CONDUITS FROM THE TRANSFORMER TO THE SECONDARY PEDESTALS SHALL BE 3" SCHEDULE 40 PVC. 0- CENTERLINCNEÂ¥615' PROPOSED TELEPHO E a./3@; 6. STREET LIGHT LINES ARE %" CONDUIT AND LOCATED *5 FEET BEHIND THE STREET CURB LOCATION. - / /50/ 0 7. PRIMARY, SECONDARY, SERVICE, AND OTHER UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PERMITTED IN THE SAME TRENCH l F PROPER S / ... - \ 0, Z LI. V- ELECTRIC EASEMEUÂ© ---- FEED TO THE SOUTH Ari~Z SPACING PERMITS. 4' OF SEPARATION HAS BEEN MAINTAINED BETWEEN ELECTRIC AND WATER LINES EXCEPT WHERE --/- /-9 / 0 -1- - CROSSINGS ARE SHOWN. : i - 1 PÂ« W 8. METER SOCKETS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED WITH THE RESIDENCE ADDRESS. -9.// , j - /-/ - - 0/ 1 , â€ž, \\OVERHEAD SERVICE LINES \ 1 9. TYPICAL SIZING FOR TELEPHONE CONDUIT IS 4" FOR ALL MAIN LINES AND 2" FOR SERVICE TO BUILDINGS. CHARTER ~- TO BE REMOVED n:50 1 ---.4-4 ~ .~ . Â® SEWER MANHOLE CABLE LINES ARE 2" FOR MAIN LINES AND 1" FOR SERVICE LINES. . 1- ~ ze* Z 25 ---13339Â· 0 0 GAS UNES Ne- 2-RE /9 OHE - OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES O r--J r- ,Â°'_225 322 I- III- CZE 23 22 - -Â»itill ..1 , Ep BURIED ELEC PRIMARY- 4' BURY - 4" CON (40" TO TOP MINIMUM) <De f # 4 \1 % - \4 ES BURIED ELEC SECONDARY - 2' BURY - 3" CON 1Â«,7 TOWN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE , 1 4 L T 1 1 \ BURIED ELEC SERVICE -2' BURY -2" CON # APPROVED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER OF ESTES PARK, ONSTALL CABLE (1") AND TELEPHONE SERVICE(2") WITH ELEC TO UNITS-TYPICAL) KOSEW K SUB, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , 2007. -----T-T.-- BURIED TELE (MAIN 4% PED-PED, 4" CON// SERVICE 18", TO BUILDINGS - 2" CON) \\ \ i \\\ \-\ 1 \ i BURIED CABLE - 18" BURY -2" CON ~ ---------' ~ EXE NG PR ANE TOWN ENGINEER LONNIE A. SHELDON, COLO. P.E.# 26974 ~ T E REP CED \\. \.. i Â¥0 1 WIT NATURAL GAS .\% \ vic' \ CENTERLINE 15' -14 \ \ \ '.r=_lr-'r--1â€ž--1 SEWERLINE EASEMENT ; / .-ar-= r.*. \20' WIDE /3 \ - T~~-EERAESDEMOENNT 1 f ~~\ ~PROPERTY LINE 7 1 0,<\ M \ s:;10661/I i / \\ ..\ 1\ 6 x11 A. 6 1 = Z // 6\\/7 4% \I:\ * 1, ~ % // 3 ,4 i n M 0 O 2 OUTLOT A o W w- 4/3 4 0 KOSEWICK SWB: - OPE~,SPACE' UTILITY, f " AND DRAINAGE \ 1 EASEMENT \14\1 KOSEWICK SUB. \ ELECTRIC TRENCH ~ 1~ \ 1 LOT 2 NO SCALE \ Bl 04 ~ 24'1 ~ 1 \N \ ..... \\ m =Â·Ca \\ \ .5-- '00 . .... '..1 . M E-1 24\ \6 4\ 4 COMPACTED FILL ~~ .4 ~ ' ~~ R Ba \94\ u~\ ---b .&. 4 3 .. / 24"* ' - TELEP HONE SERVICE AND/OR CABLE TV < Â© ~ 4 SECONDARY CONDUIT ~ \.7 .. . Â· 0 ..t / \\V . 6 kit \\1 . 1- â€¢ \ \ / h k . -# : %. I , Â·lo-*-:\--WMARKER TAPE ~ -I...=- k 6>4- ' 17 SEE NOTE BELOW E-1 '\ ... . . ..A. . . <,1 \ /. \ 41,1: 9 d .1.6..3 ' I /- \\ 40- M NIMUM \ SIZED AS NOTED Tf 'gÂ· Â· ' : . -\ '09. \: -*.... PROPOSED 25KVAÂ©TR0I~-~R~M~ER~ / ~~7 1~d~\10. KOSEWICK SUE~2~ / Va# Â·j .:9 UNTIL FURTHER pEVELOPMENT 2 LOT 3 \ >ty" \.... 90/. AA . I . ... ' . \\ COMPACTED FILL -~ - A. I. > *.~ Â· ~-Â·.Un~b 'd --/:.Â· Â·:1 2\\ CML DRAWNBY: /ILL---- - -- CHECKED BY: LAS SCALE 1"=20' 9491% 1 - SAND OR NATURAL FILL TO DATE: \ \ \- BED THE PRIMARY CONDUIT - f- 2007-08-21 FREE OF ALL ROCK AND I 3" OR 4" PRIMARY CONDUIT U STONE - 3/4" MAX SIZEE ~:~ 1 4" TELEPHONE MAIN CONDUIT J SHEET 33 8 NOTE: PlACE MARKER TAPE AT 24" BELOW THE SURFACE IF NO OTHER UTILITY LINES SHARE THE 1 RENCH WITH THE PRIMARY CABLE. IF TRENCH IS SHARED, PLACE THE MARKER TAPE AT 12" AND ABOVE TELEPHONE OR CABLE TV LINES. CD 1 1-- L) OF 0 Mll r=). 1 PROJ. NO. 2006-07-21 18 NOISIAEla 31Â¥0 ONIA3 L[908 ' M33210 0 6) :XV 88Â£6 9 (OL6) 3NOHd HNI'I NOIMGISON ~IS ON 103Nad ~ Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic ~~EJ~ Church, Development Plan #07-15 Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~:..d PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: October 16, 2007 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TITLE: "Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Addition" LOCATION: The site is located at 690 Big Thompson Avenue (US Highway 34) at the intersection with Hillside Lane. The property is within the Town of Estes Park. Legal Description: Metes and Bounds. The property is shown on the Lake View Tracts subdivision plat, but was not a part of this plat. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Our Lady of the Mountains Parish/Archdiocese of Denver CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Jes Reetz, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a development plan application to build a two-story, 3,724-square-foot addition to Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church. The proposed addition matches the current church architecture, and will house office, classroom, and storage space. This site consists of five lots for a total of approximately 6.5 acres. An overview map is provided on Development Plan Sheet 1 of 2 which shows all five lots. Per Jes Reetz, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, this map shows all improvements, easements, and utilities on the four residentially-zoned lots. The proposed construction is located on the three-acre, "CO" Outlying Commercial zoned lot. Religious assembly use is permitted by right in the "CO" zoning district. II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels Five not including the church-owned lot on north side of US Highway 34 Parcel Number(s) PID 25193-36-904 Metes and Bounds parcel Religious shown on the Lake View Assembly Tracts subdivision plat (Catholic Church) PID 25 193-08-916 Lots 16 through 19 Meditation Lake View Tracts Path PID 25193-05-918 Lot 18, Stanley Heights Unknown Addition B Gross Land Area PID 25193-36-904 130,675 square feet per 3.00 acres applicant PID 25193-08-916 152,024 square feet per 3.49 acres Town GIS Total 282,699 square feet 6.49 acres Net Land Area Same as gross land area Zoning "CO" Outlying Commercial Existing Land Use Religious Assembly (Catholic Church) Proposed Land Use Same SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No Streams/Rivers No Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Elk Ridgeline Protection Area No Page #2 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING 1 4 1,7-1 Church Owned Â«1/ --A''~irpl 00>0Vt* 7,unnel. \% 44 -*1 TEF 11 1 - 47 /9.... I 7 ' ./ iLYH .1 Churc \ Owned ~ ~ - <Use: Mixed 04**Incbil---- Zonin "Ed ,~tail & Multi:Mmily ~ S-F i ~ Zoning:"CO" ~- li S-F - J Zoning: "R-2"\ 1 f S-F j S-F ~ Use: Single-Family c ~Vacant ,1456Ii~~~ fi (S-F) - Page #3 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 AERIAL PHOTO .4. I py 4.- '.. . .-- , . 'll- % F I. ils /:imig~,& k I - ........-t> p. -- k.k &./. *t & â€¢ . '7 . F;- 4 'rs I. I F ./ /. tÂ» - e. Â·. 4 ./6--...2- . I -9.- p -,u P:4k * i. *-31.Â·#waÂ·-~1 1-- *12 A : . **Â·- ~- -3; I j $*- I r. . 1* i . 6 1 .- . 1. 4:'. =a . ..,e . I Al.all,-: 1 1 1 114. 4~ = ..2 $ 7.,I M Â»01% ..1 -4 4 1 1 1 't!.117.Al , - 1 . , . .-V I./. I,~%*1/ilill..~/mh.---P- 2 ~. /1- 4 -9. - 1. . .. e * Iv-1 - U 1 ,41 . .. ,=1.6 + -4, + d'k ' , -F *Lt.- 4/7/Il'i~ ' ~~69%66 - WL i C.LÂ¥* : *.~* 1 -4 7 ' 11 *3: .. ..=2 'Pq ...4 -7 -:S. 4 I 9:, 2 11,1 -1 Page #4 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 III. REVIEW CRITERIA The Estes Valley Plaiining Commission shall review development plan applications and all submitted plans and reports, and evaluate them according to the following standards: 1. The development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code; and 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement and other similar plans. The Estes Valley Planning Commission is the decision-making body for this application. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Estes Park Department of Building Safety See Will Birchfield's memo to Dave Shirk dated September 21, 2007. Estes Park Public Works Department See Scott Zurn's memo to Dave Shirk dated September 28,2007. Estes Park Water Department See Jeff Boles' memo to Bob Goehring dated September 19, 2007. Estes Park Light and Power Department See Mike Mangelsen's memo to Bob Goehring dated September 14, 2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letter to Dave Shirk dated September 26,2007. Colorado Department of Transportation See Gloria Hice-Idler' s email to Dave Shirk dated September 20,2007. V. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. Page #5 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 2. Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan Staff finds that, if the recommended conditions of approval are met the development plan will be consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement and other similar plans. 3. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. To address Greg White' s comment, the title on Sheet 2 of 2 should match the title on Sheet 1 of 2. Many of Public Works' comments were addressed with a resubmittal on October 10, 2007. Their most significant comments relate to submittal of a drainage master plan and traffic impact analysis, which Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying are preparing. 4. Adjacent Property Owners Staff has not received written comments from adjacent property owners; however, staff has received a call from a neighbor concerned about the cross, which was installed on the south side of the church without a permit, is illuminated at night, and does not comply with the lighting regulations. - ~129 -:-:Al:eÂ¢*Pil~~~ ' 1 Â·, 71/ ZI .1 _ I ..--:.. . rt Â»2-2~273 - - -/- 7-'- . "1 5 , i IFI :-?leÂ» fi l. 924 - Im 1 ' 1 --- I.-/P. - ' . I P - 9,' . Page #6 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 An application shall be submitted to the Building Department for the cross that was installed without a permit. This shall also include a plan for correcting the lighting violation. Unless the Building Department requires an earlier timeframe, this can be addressed when the building permit application for the addition is submitted. 5. Nonresidential Zoning District Density and Dimensional Standards The proposed use, i.e., religious assembly, is permitted in the "CO" Outlying Commercial zoning district. The plan demonstrates compliance with building/structure setbacks, impervious coverage, and fioor area ratio limits. The maximum allowable impervious coverage is sixty-five percent and a 54.48 percent coverage is proposed. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.25 and a 0.131 FAR is proposed. Detailed review for compliance with the maximum allowable height will be completed with building permit submittal. 6. Slope Protection, Grading and Site Disturbance The property slopes southeast towards Vista Lane with an average slope of 10.43 percent per the preliminary drainage report. Grading A more detailed grading plan will be reviewed with the building permit submittal. The plan should be submitted at a 1" = 10' scale. Staff does not have any concerns with the general grading plan. However, drainage arrows should - be provided on the plan, along with existing contours on Hillside Lane. Limits of Disturbance There are no platted limits of disturbance. Construction limits of disturbance are shown. These limits of disturbance should be revised to include all disturbed areas, for example, the new sidewalk/meditation trail construction to the west of the church addition and the driveway entrance onto Hillside lane. 7. Public Trails and Private Open Areas Asphalt trail exists along US Highway 34. Staff does not recommend upgrading this trail to concrete at this time or construction of sidewalk along Vista Lane or Hillside Lane. Private open areas are not required for commercial development in the "CO" Commercial Outlying zoning district. 8. Tree and Vegetation Protection Thirteen ponderosa trees will be removed to construct the addition. Staff is concerned that the proposed water line location will damage/destroy a twenty- inch Blue Spruce tree. A new water line location should be proposed. 9. Landscaping and Buffers Twenty-two trees and ninety-eight shrubs will be added to the property. These trees and shrubs will provide parking lot screening and are a significant improvement to the property. The majority of the parking spaces that currently Page #7 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 encroach into the US Highway 34 right-of-way will be removed and replaced with a landscaped area. Additional trees and shrubs will be planted along the Hillside Lane property line and along the south side of the lower parking lot. Staff is supportive of the proposed landscaping plan with two exceptions. The planting area at the corner of US Highway 34 and Hillside Lane should include some evergreen trees. The islands in the middle of the upper parking lot, shown below, should be landscaped and curb installed to protect the landscaping. L UUMU, A.U,11' INL ?U WE 'OSED STOP SIGN S~t DETERMINED IN AELD WTTH 1 (MUTCD) 3630 1 x PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -lannu- / 7 Â«1 /1,N 5752' E t,7.42'~ PAR,ONG TO BE RE#PED/ ~ 20>/' Â»4 tix,** I fo ~'~4"" ~ 1 EXISTNG ASPULT /1 / 80-EXISTING SPACES / 79-PROPOSED SPACES WOE 4 I ~ 1 1 ~~ -1 44. I . Â¢ ~341' EXST\NG / ~ / 20;" A/7 . CHASE . ~ J /, 1.7 , 1 I \ ' 43 - .ht *f;Fl'.pw \ \\ - \ / NO CURB & \ ' '137*! q & 1 * c~EMSTiNG ~4) - -.M . . . 1 .' '.'/ 6/I- 41.- 1 0/ / GUmER 1 SHRINE / Â·r ,- -- 1 + 5Â·*S' CONCRETE / ''A /~- SIDEWALK FACE w~M.*Ar~M 71. 5/ c-~'<- 1 ..>'~ A _w,24~*ESâ‚¬--it-7 4 4.9 WIDE v 18- PIP ' , ~) RE-LOGI<DisTING 1 F~ ~ IPE EPS FROM .*.41.0/AC t / (7Mg o~ \ ~, k / ' 0 / CONCRETV -(7561.83) " 20. " 1 --r Tow 80 . i TO MATCH EXISTING N - =2 7 1 -itÂ» ~1 EXISING Â£ ah#::~4 0" t~ ~'' 32) - 98 3514 - 1 11 4, (73.3 FT) 0 - Bit'* 5,17,...11 AU " ' =361 ~Aot 44 / - &* i . _ - I -I .24~.1- Ext 2 'litt.4 ELEVAÂ©N (7583 m -. -.--.Â» 1 I .1.14 21.4~1% * '>.3 JliRIGM~J~3-~ I/Al /14~4*423il Â» -1'E- ~,-I--4 11*IM'%311: 1.11 0 #I l I ..,2 1 ".741 :,fr "-(7863.249 i. r<L ./ JI,/>1 1 L Z=LUIEÂ¥~-.3 ~ .. t>p -; 1-, 1 I OUR LADY OF THE EXISTINGt\ tkN.f~h.,it/\- aer~ 1339.g~TI 44Â· ~ o ~2 22~Ral 'f,7 7#=LA/"%~F-r~Â·a.~RE ~a ~&~~F~~~I~66 10. Wetlands and Stream Corridor Protection There are no wetlands or streams/rivers on site to protect. 11. Geologic and Wildfire Hazards The property is not in a mapped geologic or wildfire hazard area. 12. Wildlife Habitat Protection The site is in mapped elk habitat. No comments were received from the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Staff waived the requirement to provide a wildlife conservation plan. Staff does not recommend additional buffering for wildlife. Non-native vegetation is not permitted and is not proposed. A note on the plan states that lighting will be minimized as required. Page #8 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 13. Exterior Lighting General Note #3 on Sheet 1 of 2 states that bollard lighting may be used. The locations of the proposed light fixtures should be shown on the plan for staff review and approval. The plan also shows the relocation of an existing light fixture in the southeast corner of the upper parking lot. 14. Operational Performance Standards The development plan addresses operational and physical compatibility with existing uses. The off-site impacts will be reduced with the removal of the majority of the parking from the right-of-way and reconstruction of the driveway connection to Hillside Lane. Drainage impacts remain to be addressed. 15. Off-Street Parking and Loading The plan meets the minimum parking requirements. Parking calculations on both Sheets 1 and 2 should be clarified. The numbers on the two pages do not appear to be consistent with each other and notes on the second page state that additional spaces will be added to the sixteen-space parking lot; however, these additional spaces are not shown. The proposed . parking spaces, driveways and _ access aisles meet the minimum required widths. The parking lot does not meet the minimum required setbacks. As the church expands staff recommends that the church continue to move towards construction of a code compliant parking lot. The proposed redesign is a significant step towards code compliance and CDOT is supportive of the proposed redesign. The plan should clarify that the Hillside Lane driveway connection is proposed not existing. The existing gate separating the lower and upper parking lots should be shown with a note about removal of the gate. Bicycle racks will be provided and will be located near the main church entrance. 16. Adequate Public Facilities Adequate public facility improvements are required to be installed or guaranteed prior to issuance of the first building permit and improvements are required to be installed concurrent with the impacts of the development. An engineer' s cost estimate should be submitted for staff review and approval prior to obtaining the guarantee. Sewage Disposal This lot is served by the Estes Park Sanitation District (EPSD) and a new sewer service line is proposed to connect to an eight-inch line which runs across the all four residentially-zoned lots owned by the church. This line should be placed in a dedicated easement. Per Jes Reetz, Cornerstone found a church document showing that the majority of this line is an easement; however, they were unable to find a recorded document describing the easement. Page #9 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 Water A four-inch water line is proposed to connect to a twelve-inch main located in the Hillside Lane right-of-way. General Note #14 on Sheet 1 of 2 states that final sizing will be determined at the building permit phase. The water line should be located further away from the twenty-inch Blue Spruce tree to avoid damage to the tree. Drainage/Water Quality Management The drainage pond south of the lower parking lot was designed to detain stormwater from this lower lot only. Water from the upper lot drains undetained and unfiltered onto Hillside Lane and Vista Lane. A culvert under US Highway 34 also releases water onto this site. All water eventually reaches a detention pond in the Village Green subdivision. This subdivision has experienced significant drainage problems in the past. Staff recommend submittal of a drainage master plan for build out of the 6.5- acre site. Once staff has reviewed this drainage report installation of drainage facilities and/or easements may be required with this proposed addition to the church. Fire Protection The ISO calculations show that no additional fire hydrants are needed and none are proposed. A fire suppression system will be required for the addition as is noted on the plan. The Fire Chief has reviewed the ISO calculations and this plan; he has not expressed any concerns with fire protection. Fire-lane striping near the 4.2-foot-wide sidewalk in the westernmost parking lot should be shown. Transportation Since this development is adjacent to a state highway, submittal of a traffic impact analysis is required for review by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Town. The traffic impact analysis should include information about accidents at the US Highway 34 intersection with Hillside Lane. Staff is concerned about the safety of this intersection; sight visibility is poor. The Public Works' memo recommends removal of the church access to Hillside Lane to eliminate church traffic turning left onto US Highway 34 from Hillside Lane. After further discussion, staff is supportive of redesigning, rather than eliminating, the driveway connection to Hillside Lane to prevent left-turns. The proposed design will need to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to final development plan approval. Page #10 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 17. Electricity Underground electric service will connect through Lot 16, Lake View Tracts subdivision and will be placed in an easement. The Light and Power Department has expressed no concerns about this proposal. 18. Outdoor Storage, Areas, Activities and Mechanical Equipment The proposed development complies with all applicable standards. Conduit, meters, and vents need to be screened, covered, or painted to minimize visual impacts. 19. Other The storage shed on the north side of the lower parking lot should be shown on the development plan. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the application CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Cori*liance with the affected agency comments. To address Greg White's comment, the title on Sheet 2 of 2 shall match the title on Sheet 1 of 2. The traffic impact analysis recommended by Public Works shall include information about accidents at the US Highway 34 intersection with Hillside Lane. 2. An application shall be submitted to the Building Department for the cross that was installed without a permit. This shall also include a plan for correcting the lighting violation. 3. Drainage arrows shall be provided on the plan, along with existing contours on Hillside Lane. 4. The limits of disturbance shall be revised to include all disturbed areas, for example the new sidewalk/meditation trail construction to the west of the church addition and the driveway entrance onto Hillside lane. 5. A new water line location shall be proposed that does not impact existing trees. 6. The planting area at the corner of US Highway 34 and Hillside Lane shall include evergreen trees. 7. The islands in the middle of the upper parking lot shall be landscaped and curb installed to protect the landscaping. 8. The locations of the proposed light fixtures shall be shown on the plan for staff review and approval. Page #11 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 9. Parking calculations on both Sheets 1 and 2 shall be clarified. The numbers on the two pages do not appear to be consistent with each other and notes on the second page state that additional spaces will be added to the sixteen-space parking lot; however, these additional spaces are not shown. 10. The plan shall clarify that the Hillside Lane driveway connection is proposed not existing. 11. The existing gate separating the lower and upper parking lots shall be shown with a note about removal of the gate. 12. The sewer line which runs across the all four residentially-zoned lots owned by the church shall be placed in a dedicated easement. 13. Fire-lane striping near the 4.2-foot-wide sidewalk in the westernmost parking lot shall be shown. 14. The storage shed on the north side of the lower parking lot shall be shown on the development plan. 15. A revised application satisfying the conditions of approval shall be submitted to Community Development by 12:00 p.m. on October 24, 2007 for rerouting to affected agencies. The mylar submittal deadline shall be extended from November 15, 2007 to December 20,2007 to allow adequate time for review. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to approve the development plan application with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the development plan application to the (date) Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance -findings). DENIAL I move to DENY the development plan application because... (state reason for denial - findings). Page #12 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Development Plan #07-15 (1 A mij Town of Estes Park 1510 Public Works Engineering Â® ESTES PARK Room 100, Municipal Building COLORADO P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, qsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Dave Shirk, Planner From: Scott Zurn, Director Date: September 28,2007 Re: Our Lady of the Mtns. Catholic Church, 920 Big Thompson Ave (Hwy 34) After reviewing Development Plan 07-15 the Public Works Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Correct Plan typo: east road is Hillside Lane not Meadow Lane. 2. Provide Final Drainage Report. a. include Lots 16-19 b. provide drainage easement on downhill lots that receive runoff. c. provide one pond location, associated berm's, and associated easements. d. all site storm water must be detained on site. 3. Provide Site Master Plan and Utility Master Plan. Note: any future improvements on Lots 16-19 will require full review and application of the EVDC including ROW dedication and curb/gutter-sidewalk improvements. 4. Remove parking lot east access to Hillside Lane, and install concrete curbing to west, plus fill & landscaping. 5. Provide a copy of the Special Use & ROW permits from CDOT for improvements within Hwy 34 ROW. 6. Show existing water service. Upon replacement, it must be shut-off at main per Standards. 7. Show water Main within Hwy 34 ROW. 8. Dedicate 7.5' of Right-of-Way to existing Hillside lane. 9. Provide sight visibility distances at Hillside Lane at Hwy 34. 10. TIA shall reference accident history at Vista, Driveway and Hillside intersections with Hwy 34. 11. For clarity, show existing concrete curb returns and trails on plan 12. Acquire Sign Permit for electric 'Cross's. 13. Install H/C bump treatment on all interior H/C ramps and 4 locations of Highway 34 trail. â€¢ Page 1 i Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum ESTES l~~|PARK COLORADO TO: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 9/19/2007 Re: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Addition, Metes & Bounds, 690 Big Thompson Avenue After review of the Development Plan 07-15 the Water Department has the following comments: 1) Applicant must schedule a Water Fixture/Dwelling Unit Count with a representative of the Water Department prior to demolition and/or construction to ensure any applicable credit toward additional water fees. Contact the department at 970-577-3622 for scheduling. Any demolition done prior to the fixture count will result in forfeiture of any applicable water tap credits. 2) The existing water service line must be abandoned at the tap when the new proposed fire sprinkler / service line is placed in service. 3) If the structure is required to have a Fire Suppression System a 'Fire Sprinkler System Connection Application' must be completed and submitted to the Water Department before any connection is granted. This application must include a detailed drawing noting: â€¢ Location, sizing and type of backflow prevention device(s) â€¢ Engineered flow requirements for the fire sprinkler system â€¢ Spill control method for proper disposal of discharge from the relief valve, indicating location and sizing of drainage capable of accommodating the discharge that could occur Due to fire line size both a chlorination and pressure test will be required, conducted by a representative of the Water Department prior to acceptance. Any Fire suppression line servicing a building from the water main is a private service line and must be noted as such on the Development Plan and the Subdivision Plat. Future repair or maintenance required on this service is the sole responsibility of the building owner. 4) Cross Connection Requirements: â€¢ All service lines are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for containment purposes. The device type will be dependant upon the hazard associated with the service (high hazard or low hazard). The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Technician upon installation and annually there after. Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum ESTES 1!2~1 PARK COLORADO â€¢ All irrigation systems are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for isolation purposes. The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Technician upon installation and annually there after. Contact the Cross-Connection Control Specialist at 970-577-3625 with any questions regarding the backflow requirements for this property. Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 09-14-07 Re: Our Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church Addition, 690 Big Thompson Avenue The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for Development Plan 07-15 for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1) We will need to know the size of the service (amp requirement, volt, phase etc.) before we can provide the cost of service. 1 MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: September 21, 2007 Subject: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Addition Metes & Bounds 690 Big Thompson Ave. The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for the Development Plan for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. Please see attached Development Plan Review Checklist comments. t Review Date: 9/21/2007 Review By: Will Birchfield DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 690 Bia Thompson Avenue U All construction documents shall be prepared by Colorado Design Professionals and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U A detailed Code Analysis by a Colorado Design Professional is required. U A detailed site plan is required and shall include utility locations, setbacks, contours, drainage, landscaping, access, easements, etc. C] Utility services (plumbing, electrical, gas) may require upgrading. U A grading and drainage plan shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U Grading plans and permits are required prior to and are separate from building permits. A grading permit is required prior to any grading or excavation (Estes Park Municipal Code Â§14.12.030) The limits of site disturbance shall be maintained and are restricted to within the property lines and/or to areas specified on the approved plans. State and Town Demo Permits are required prior to any demolition activity. Prior to any excavation and/or construction activity, a detailed drainage/erosion plan to protect neighboring properties, public right-of-ways, and drainage areas during the construction phase shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Filtration of storm water is required prior to release from the site. Failure to comply with said approved plans may result in an immediate stop work order on the entire development. The final site drainage plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department. U The foundation systems, including mitigation of potential water problems shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U Foundation setback and elevation certificates shall be provided by a Colorado design Professional, and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U A construction traffic plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works and Police Departments prior to obstructing or interfering with any vehicular traffic on public right-of-ways. C-Dot shall approve all construction activity on State Highway 34. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-690 Big Thompson.doc Revised 10/17/2006- CB m El El , (~ U All new construction shall comply with all applicable accessibility laws. It is the designers' and developers' responsibilities to comply with laws that Town staff does not have the authority to interpret nor the responsibility to enforce, such as ADA, Federal and State Fair Housing Acts, etc. Additionally, the designer shall specifically detail how the proposed development shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the 2003 IBC, Chapter 11. Detailed accessibility specs are required. U All appendages, such as decks, roofs and steeples must be shown on the plans, . including building footprint details and construction details. U Building permits are required prior to any construction and/or remodeling. U Possible structure added to south church roof. No building permit on record. Provide information to determine if permit is required. U A Building permit is required for temporary construction office trailers. U Sign permits are required and are separate from building permits. El All requirements of the approved development plan shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of approved variances shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of Planning Commission conditions of approval shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. El A pre-construction meeting with Town staff and construction contractors is required prior to issuance of building permits. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-690 Big Thompson.doc Revised 9/19/2006- CB , GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 September 26,2007 DAVE SH[RK-, PLANNER COMMUNITY- DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-15 - Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Addition Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Development Plan states in the caption that it is owned by "St. Walters Church" and the Statement of Intent states that the ownership is the Archdiocese of Denver. The actual legal description of the property needs to be reviewed to make sure that the ownership information on the Development Plan is accurate and all headings reflect the actual ownership. If you have any questions, pleas;~ do not hesitate to give me a call. *e~y Tr*Yours, / \ /6 .137â‚¬ Gredo/v A. White GAW/ldr ft Ce: Grnerstone Engineering, Kerry-Prochaska Fax: 970/586-2459 C Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 80517 October 10, 2007 Alison Chilcott, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517-1200 RE: Our Lady of the Mountains Church Dear Alison Chilcott, Upon review of the proposed Development Plan for the above mentioned property the District has the following comments: ( 1. The sewer line shown on the plat is actually six inch, not eight inch as shown. It is a private line owned by the church. Also the path shown is not quite correct. Staff can help in the location of the line if they would like clarification for future projects, 2. System Investment fees will apply to any new fixtures added to the devel- opment. 3, No kitchen improvements are slated at this time. Should the kitchen facili- ties be upgraded an interceptor will required. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this review. Sincerely, James Duell District Manager Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 ,Â· 01 [/ 1~ Message c < Page 1 of 3 Alison Chilcott From: Alison Chilcott Sent: Wednesday, October 03,2007 9:00 AM To: 'Jes Reetz' Subject: FW: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church . Jes, Here's the comments we discussed briefly. Alison Chilcott Estes Park Planning Department PO Box 1200 (970) 577-3720 (970) 586-0249 fax achilcott@estes.org www.estesnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Hice-Idler, Gloria [mailto:Gloria.Hice-Idler@DOT.STATE.CO.US] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 6:58 AM To: Alison Chilcott Cc: Greg Sievers; Scott Zurn Subject: RE: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church l can support. Gloria Hice-Idler Access Manager CDOT Region 4 1420 2nd Street Greeley CO 80631 (970) 350-2148 From: Alison Chilcott [mailto:achilcott@estes.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 02,2007 4:33 PM To: Hice-Idler, Gloria Cc: Greg Sievers; Scott Zurn Subject: AN: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Gloria, Staff is recommending significant revisions to this application. If Planning Commission supports our recommendation the application will be rerouted to you with a traffic impact analysis that includes an analysis of Intl/,An7 Message ( C Page 2 of 3 the accidents at the Hillside Lane (shown as Meadow Lane on the development plan)/Highway 34 intersection. Public Works noted that the making a left turn onto Highway 34 is dangerous and there have been a number of accidents, some serious. Hillside Lane has an approximately 20% slope at this intersection and sight visibility is not good. Town staff are recommending removal of the church driveway access to Hillside Lane to eliminate church traffic at this intersection. At the recommendation of staff, the applicant is revising their parking lot layout to remove most, but not all, of their parking from the CDOT right-of-way. Can you support this? I will be completing review of this application. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. Alison Chilcott Estes Park Planning Department PO Box 1200 (970) 577-3720 (970) 586-0249 fax achilcott@estes.org www.estesnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Dave Shirk Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 8:37 AM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: FW: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church From: Hice-Idler, Gloria [mailto:Gloria.Hice-Idler@DOT.STATE.CO.US] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:14 AM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church Dave, I reviewed this proposal, but I'm not sure that I really understand. There's a statement that traffic using the parking will not increase, and I would agree with that, you can only use 147 spaces if there's only 147 spaces. But the issue for me is whether traffic using the access is increasing by more than 20%. I don't think I can answer that question. The addition seems to significant, yet no increase of traffic? Why expand? Also, it appears that maybe some of their parking is in CDOT right-of-way. That may be occuring now, and could be considered historical (grandfathered), but I think we would want to discourage that if they're making changes. And last but not least, projected ROW need is 75' either side of the highway centerline. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Gloria Hice-Idler Access Manager Message ( Page 3 of 3 CDOT Region 4 1420 2nd Street Greeley CO 80631 (970) 350-2148 P. ( CORNEASTONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & .i (~Â©, SURVEYING. INC 1 % IE Â© 1.E 11 V E Ta AQ [74 - 11 \\ October 8,2007 ~ _~ OCT 1 0 2007 f ~ Mrs. Alison Chilcott Community Development Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter of Intent for the "Out Lady ofthe Mountain Catholic Church Addition" Dear Alison, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of our client Our Lady of the Mountain Parich are pleased to submit the Development plan for "Out Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church Addition". Owners/Lien Holders The subject property is currently owned by Archdiocese of Denver, a Colorado Corporation Sole, as Trustee for the Parish, Our Lady of the Mountains. acent Properties & Zoning Current zoning of the subject property is "CO" Commercial Outlying. Surrounding properties are also owned by Archdiocese of Denver, a Colorado Corporation Sole, as Trustee for the Parish, Our Lady of the Mountains and are zoned R2-Two-Family Residential. Proiect Description This plan will add a 3724 SF addition to the existing Catholic Church. This addition will be located on the south side of the building and will also add a patio area off the lower level. The sidewalk to the main entrance will be re-graded and new sidewalk poured to allow accessible access through the main entrance and the proposed addition entrance. Parking The existing parking area will be re-striped and portions of existing asphalt removed to allow for a landscape screen between the existing parking area and United States Highway No. 34. EVDC section 7.11 requires 94 parking spaces, our plan proposes 133 parking spaces. Traffic Impact This plan does not increase the amount of traffic currently using the church parking. At this time peak traffic counts occur during church service when traffic is either entering or vacating the premises in a span of twenty (20) minutes. Based on parking stalls this would result in a peak hourly ADT of 147. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 6th Edition, the resultant ADT is 158. Phasing Once approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission is obtained construction will be beginning late 2007 early 2008. Utilities Utility services are provided as follows: Water Town of Estes Park Service will be provided from an existing 12" water main located in Hillside Lane. The service is currently shown as 4", final size to be determined at the building permit phase. Electric Town of Estes Park A new transformer is proposed to provide service to the existing building. Gas Excel Existing service is off of Hillside Lane Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District A new service line is being proposed to tie into and existing sewer service from the church. ISO Calculations ISO calculations have been performed and submitted to the town for review. This proposed building meets the required Fire Flow. Variance Request For Landscaping The existing landscaping is nonconforming per the current Development Code with the proposed landscaping improving the conformance around the existing parking areas to provide better screening for the surrounding properties. A variance is being requested from the "District Buffer Landscaping" requirement. The buffer landscaping calculations call for 52 trees and 49 shrubs based on the existing and proposed development. The plan is proposing 22 trees and 98 shrubs. These proposed planting will improve the district buffering around the existing parking areas. A total of 13 ofthe 57 trees are proposed to be removed for the new addition. The trees proposed for removal are not critical to the offsite screening for the surrounding properties. Our Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church is requesting a variance for the replacement of the trees to be removed beyond the trees proposed for the district buffering. Stormwater A drainage report has been included as part of the submittal package. No design information was obtained on the existing detention pond located at the southeast corner ofthe lower parking area. Base on field measurements and our office calculations the pond provides a detention volume of approximately 330 cubic feet with a maximum release through a V- notch weir of approximately 2 cubic feet per second. The pond was lined with rip rap and is in good condition. The offsite drainage entering the property through the 24" culvert under Highway 34 is conveyed down the parking lot and leaves the property at the southeast corner ofthe property. We feel that no additional curbing is required along Hillside Lane. Greg Sievers at Public works was contacted about the offsite drainage entering and leaving the property. Mr. Sievers said that he was vaguely familiar with the drainage surrounding the property. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Jes Reetz Senior Draftsman < DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIC,1~ E Â©113 0 Â¥[E =% ESTES VALLEY r ~-~ OCT 1 0 2007 _~ Submittal Date: 8/22/2007 Type of Application 1 . 12 Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map r Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map F Rezoning Petition E Street Name Change r Final Map 1- Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat F Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat F Amended Plat General Information Project Name Our Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church Addition Project Description Proposed 3,724 SF addition onto the existing church Project Address 690 Big Thompson Avenue Legal Description St. Walter Church, As shown on the Lake View Tracts Subdivision Plat Parcel ID # 25193-36-904 Section 19 Township 5N Range 72W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 3.000 Existing Land Use Religious Assembly Proposed Land Use Religious Assembly Existing Water Service 12 Town E Well F Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 12 Town E Well F Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service P EPSD r UTSD r septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service 12 EPSD r UTSD r Septic Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes P No Existing Gas Service 9 Xcel 17 Other F None Existing Zoning CO-Commercial Outlying Proposed Zoning CO-Commercial Outlying Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes P No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? P Yes E No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Jes Reetz Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue e Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 + Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev ~Irlrl~Irl C C Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant P ConsultanVEngineer Record Owner(S) Archdlocese of Denver, a Colorado Corporation Sole, 25 Trustee for the Parish, Our Lady of the Mountains Mailing Address 1300 South Steele St., Denver, CO 80206 Phone (303) 715-3204 Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Our Lady of the Mountain Parish Mailing Address PO Box 1335, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-8111 Cell Phone Fax Email Consultan#Engineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. ~IE CIEDBNO I-*A Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-2458 Cell Phone LIM-_2 Fax (970) 586-2459 Email ireetz@ces-ccc.com APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule inciuded in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule. pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Monsignor Thomas Fryar, V.G. Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Father Gregory Cioch Signatures: Record Owner ~J~- 14~~ ~1 - Date tj/ch, Applicant #J G r CÂ¢230 . 410\03 Il E . cl 8902SILEDE 2UIq.unooow 9 eoueul~=1 Wd98:I 6002 02 Dnw Cor'lact 'florrnation - C C APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application l am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property * In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). * I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVE)C, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. $ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. * I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my properw during the review of this application. â€¢ l acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. lunderstandthatfullfeeswillbe charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Monsignor Thomas Fryar, V.G. Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Father Gregory Cioch Signatures: Record Owner p-â€ž......,p-33~ 0P-1 Daa 9/4 /07 Applicant Apy g - Ct,DI Date g)20~07 ~CEÂ©[20Â¥*E ~~ AUG 2 2 2007 =~ Revised 10/13/06 9-ct 8902STLEOE Sul:junoDOW '8 8OUeUId Wdge:I 6002 02 Dng ( g 00 00 h h Ahh Ng hANNAh AN~ *ANNANNA 23@233&*&&88*@B-@@@@@@ @@018@33@@GE 0 0 4 in 00 00 25 0 cO wco Â¤ Â¤ co - g 00 90 9 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8000 00000 9 00 000 M 000*000000 loof @goooOOoO "O 13 NU)000OO0wooo *00000000000200 0 -0000000001 =St--=BUU=91 8 ==S=====~0, 2~ 23 2 4444=22 -00 0 2-22 0 (0 -0 --F M M Â£ Â£ -E Â£ CD m LU 0- 9 m 9%%A -2 -0 -2 9=0 0-050-0-0-0-0- 0- E . 0 0-0- 0- 0- 0-0- 0- 0- z Gi 8 202:i:Jigal#12123#2331 3% 0 Â® 0 0 0 c U.1 JILILLILLICS JJLL ~ CD U.1 LL O LU U.1 LU U.1 LULLIJ ~ UJ U) O <UJUJUJUJUJ U.1 LUO 111 > C\1 al 1 'r- * 23 9 3~ve * m P m.- %9! <2 2 2,1,29 c 2 * 45 8 17"0 m *232~ 69 ES~ %23 g 2 gE NE93%EE#9,-E~~AÂ® AM J =00 2 a -2 0 < m a) R U) co U WO 4,2 02 -t 0 0.- ma:%@M.133:43251@mi; a.8.28&%02&225: 2 m .2 A -g, 2 ,%~a 31 u,O&590Â©a9SESSR!~&!WRS!#922120283@082&022@50 r O- 91- N O. O- 1.0 - 10 ID - N 10 N N 09 ID G) 10 00 00 00 91- O. C) h 91- O- 9- C) CO O- C) 4- co CO Q. 0- Jc JI -1 E J .EL â‚¬ 4 4 0 -Â¤ E Em CD (D C Ca) 5 > r * -9 2 Zi 2 /9 8 8 2 02 8 -8-06 - E, 8 $ O.â‚¬0 0 -C .C c E.2 5 m m m *%00 or CO co .8 g e CD 2 =1 figs - 13 0Ei ~ ~*~ Â§ 28 I U D 0 2 ~ -8 E 2 0 3.21 3 (I) c ~ Eg Â£ %8 â‚¬ 0 0 0 2 5 15 0- O 2 2- -~= 0=~ateed =a E vgÂ£-5/ Â®mum@3= 0 2 -0 -E .0 -C c -92 Ic 2%22%*5.0.ws@225=2&*E c a)-i a.5 Ea. c * c H /5 4O6O69~8My'0602 or@84 J ..:loa@232%2 ki 'ZE.g~3 5<-i.EvEdn- 10 2 w mIT,-iodE_jE old Ao Â® c %-3%%~8%2~1 i~ ~~ 0~-~ ~~~ ~al~ ~-g ~-6~ ~-~~~: -5 2/igRE cm-(0.C-692-Â¤mq'Â§-iJÂ°dEJoi 00 - Â·000 O CD 00 07Â£9-EU) -1 I 00 â‚¬ LLI $ 0 (13 E DA inZ $ m LLIO orZOCOrn $ CO < ge,DIO In> ZL90 6~, xO8 Od '8 Ppy slH Xeluele ' LE 101 :3hl eeisrul ' Snil 9 Mueq ele Owner 11 Address City, State, e aid Shaw & Mary Lynne Acheson . Dunbar Trail Sioux Falls, x 2825 Estes Park, reeley, Jed se 0103!0 e 8 3N 'eqelll leeilS 4117 ;on Avenue, #2252 ine Drive Drive n Avenue rest Road ge Drive Drive en Drive imit Drive Panorama Circle # 'enUeAv uosdl,UO41 01!0 BLUBJOU 9 L-Zo da 4Nn40 0404 120 sull/y JO *Pel ino Candace Reuland lender UosueAelS f ucker DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE STATISTICS: Utilities: 02 . HaeR,5 36 OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAIN Water Town of Estes Pork Electric Town of Estes Park * 60 32 52 I 63.03 / Telephone Qwest -J C 1.42 Sewer Estes Pork Sanitation District Gos Excel 33 58 35 - L| 01 t-01 54 02 8 J 41 ~ GROSS/NET LAND AREA - 130,675 SF 3.000 ACRES 27~-d#E & 22 ~ - ,0 TRACT A~-4 ( CATHOLIC CHURCH ADDITION 08. 07 05.04.03.02.01.01 g k.1-3 ST. WALTERS CHURCH, AS SHOWN ON THE LAKE VIEW TRACTS SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOT 4 OF STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION ELQQB-ABILERQ 23. 03 1.-___/ 39/ Net Land Area * 25% allowed CO Zoning MZjViLIE Allowed TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, STATE OF COLORADO < WT7 N .Nidpl,m f 28_~ 27 \ 1-a 25 \0#-r 21 0 Proposed Building Floor area 3,724 SF f0311197 11-\017/.> j--2 kÂ·-1- 32->' 20 0 Existing Building Floor area 1222-SE 01 g 09. 01 TOTAL Proposed Floor area 17,117 SF \021 29 t.Â·.'~ 11 ~~ 31 300' 19 0~ 02 2-Kni r 18 ~ 12 \22 02 15 FLOOR AREA RATIO 13.1% 17 2 03 ue 06 07 08 03 6 .... / O 16 05 PREPARED BY: SITE LAND AREA IMPERVIOUS COVERAGES STATISTIC COVERAGE LUI[ 12 15 19 0, 04 16% su . /73 Â¥...N EXISDMi-LANLUSE 01 18. 17 02.11 59,841 sf 45.79% Pao OORNEESTONE Existing Building 7,686 sf 5.88% Asphalt Parking 00 1 24 9. 13. 14. 15 05 st 1 Sidewalks & Shrines 4,740 sf 3.63% 23 07.10. 08 -~ 4 1/a PLANT 1 0,1Dl, 0 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 72,267 sf 55.30% pn-1 - -- - OPEN SPACE 58,408 sf 44.70% 'HOLE eCLF COURSE r., -v' 7- .- -L -- 0 0 0 RIVER 0 Aspholt Parking 55,770 sf 42.68% PROPOSED_LAND_10'SE Existing Building + Addition 10,072 sf 7.71% ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC Sidewalks 5,349 sf 4.09% (970) 586-2458 TOTAL (65% ALLOWED) 71,191 sf 54.48% 08 ..0HWAY35 THOveSON br'im-14 1692 BIG THOMPSON SUITE 200 AFE DEPT. ESTES PARK, CO. 80517 NkÂ¢F FAX (970) 586-2459 OPEN SPACE 59,484 sf 45.52% &1*=01 PON.PIANT 45 . PARKING CALCULATIONS: >91 22'EK 01 1 . MAP TAKEN FROM TOWN OF EWES PARK DIGTTAL MAP 1 ..... 6 REGULAR HANDICAP TOTAL VICINITY MAP REUGIOUS ASSEMBLY 1 PER 50 SQUARE FEET OF SEATING/ASSEMBLY AREA 90 4 94 (EVDC 7.11) (4,700 SF) SCALE 1"=600' LEGEND: SUBJECT PROPERTY UNE TOTAL REQUIRED 90 6 94 - - ADJACENT PROPERTY UNE TOTAL EXISTING 139 7 146 - - BUILDING SETBACK UNE TOTAL PROPOSED 133 6 139 7690 EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR --------- EXISTING EASEMENT UNE GENERAL NOTES: - -W EXISTING WATER LINE , EXISTING SEWER UNE 1) Zoning of the subject property is CO-Commercial Outlying. - - - E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECmIC UNE - - - OMP - EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER UNE 2) Setbocks - Front 25 feet from State Highway No. 34, 25 feet from West and South COLORADO MATE BIGHWAY No. 84 -G EXISTING GAS UNE property lines, 15 feet from East property line. It? / Â£Â·id'*~ . ----=- \ l561Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE Chapter 7, section 7.9). Exterior lighting to be bollard type (three feet height Limit) or J 2 2 G 0 0 0 0 EXISTING HANDRAIL 3) All exterior lighting sholl be shielded and downcast; (refer to Estes Valley Development Code -- 9'Â·42*5*59 \\\\ attached to buildings and will adopt to the current development code. All street lights shall tâ‚¬~' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' EXISTING TREE (TYP,) be a maximum 15-feet above grade. , 0 r55<_11 Z+----/ ./. ./ /4/ 10. 4 . 1.4 * -- . \ 1 k ./ 4) All disturbed areas will be reseeded or sodded with native grasses/wildflower mix. All new 5752' E---412 0 \ 214:Â·Â·. .,, 4,4, P f'*,1 9RD --- 4\ \ \4\ 6 - - ' ~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) requirements in EVDC 7.5.D General Landscaping Design Standards. I m trees and shrubs will be maintained in o healthful condition. All plants shall Ineet \ 4./2 -4(2.4 --2--- D .. , I Fl L . -,8=/6 i 5) Contractors must call Utilities Notification Center of Colorado prior to excovating \ d Â· - - 0- . 7888 . pnorosco CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION 11 1 \ UY \ Â·Â·// \ - â€¢ .=- LIMITS OF DISTRUB*ICE (1-800-922-1987). L-- S lai PROPOSED 4" SEWER SERVICE 0 .Â« 404-_ . i ./1 with on elevation of 7692.70. El-g PROPOSED ELECTRIC 40 PVC 6) Elevations ore relative to a found Highway Righ-Of-Way marker being a 3-1/2" Brass Cap , 0 -h 1 3.0/Z PROPOSED ELECTRIC 30 PVC 2 ' Pr -1--- 7 PROPOSED TELEPHONE 7) All required improvements shall be completed or guaranteed in accordance with EVDC 7,12 r 1 - 0# PROPOSED CABLE TV and 16.5.K prior to certificate of occupancy. . 1 1WO- RES! .4.P. PROPOSED WATER UNE 40 DUCTILE IRON PIPE - -7 1 . D 8) The owner shall be required to provide for handicap accessibility in accordance with the \ .. . r ~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ADA and U.B.C. @- 0 ; 1 /A Â· Â· ' Â· Â· Â· Â· ' Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· PROPOSED TRANSFORMER 9) Approval of this development plan creates a vested right pursuant to Article 88 of Title 24, \ \ 2 1 C.R.S., as amended. \ i \ ij ~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· EXISTING PARKING COUNT \ O - 10) This development plan is a schematic representation of proposed improvements and does 1 1 J ~~ ~Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· PROPOSED PARKING COUNT not show all the design elements needed to construct any of the improvements. Nt\\ 1 \ \ 3, / 1 Â· -Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· EXISTING DRAINAGE PATH , I. 9 /1 11) Site has an average slope of 7.7%:E. \ x ~ 1 - f \ 01-* 0.- / -0 \\\\\ B /O @ \A \ \\ -- /00 12) Contours ore 2' interval. #\\ .\<\1,\ %\24-%-- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: , \ \ - ST WALTERS CHURCH, AS SHOWN ON LAKE VIEW TRACTS Devices" (MUTCD) and mounted on a 2-3/8" steel post. " 13) All road signs ore to be per the current addition of the "Manual of Uniform Traffic Control N / / 4 4 1 11 %- 331 . _<~ / '/f, ~ 1 SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOT 4 OF STANLEY MEADOWS ADDITION \ \ VIEW \ -2~ - TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, STATE OF COLORADO 14) Water service line is shown as 4% find size to be determined at building permit phase. -2 - 1, 1 - )\ \\ \\\ \\-- --223 - C /// // \ \\ , ..1 LANDSCAPING NOTES: \ \\ h , $ j.:I. \\\ \ .4 OWNERS STATEMENT: 1) All areas disturbed by construction to be revegetated with designated seed mixes (seeding S should be drilled to ensure better growth probability). h \ - 7 \ / // The undersigned, being 011 the owners and lienholders of the real property as shown \ 7 1 h / - 6 on this development plan, shall be subject to the provisions of the Estes Valley - \ / . .1 2) Topsoil shall be stripped in areas of disturbance and stockpiled to be redistributed to o I k - - V Development Code and any other ordinance of the Town of of Estes Park, Colorado, i \ -V- N \ -- -- / M pertaining thereto. depth of 4Â» minimum when revegetation is begun. - 3) All seeded areas to be hydromulched at a rate of 1 1/2 tons per acre. All seeded slopes - Owner WEN_ -- greater than 2:1 to be mulched and netted for erosion control (use straw bales where 7 - -22 EegeMIN RES'09'al-" - -- - 7- "- TNO-FAMILY RESIDENrIAL - 1 / \ MONSIGNOR THOMAS FRYAR, V.G. / \ 4 --RS*=t-Â£ / h . - 1 //4\ needed to avoid erosion and enhance growth potential). ~ ~ AREK NOf-2Â£ED IN T 15 *12 < ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER 4) All planting beds to be excavated to a 16" depth and backfilled to an elevation of 2" below A COLORADO CORPORATION SOLE, walks or lowns with soil mix consisting of: 1/3 topsoil, 1/3 peatmoss, and PROPER[* OWNED 89<7- - ' ' AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PARISH, 1 /3 existing soil. 1 - $ - OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS ATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE 5) Cover all planting beds with soil fabric prior to plant installation. ~ O fOTAC -CREA ~6./5.-'AdRE#- - - 4 /03 N 6) Install 3' wide cobble and gravel foundation border around all buildings. - 1-3 i . - 7) All trees shall have a rnulch ring 36" in diameter at the base of the tree. (flu %Â» 4 -J \ \ 0 \ \ r ECED V.[3 -313 1 f 0 * - 8) All tree rings and shrub beds to be mulched ot o minimum depth of 3Â», material to be ~ -- -- - --- 9----- E-'\ - APPROVAL: determined by owner. i << - - Day - Approved by the Estes Volley Planning Commission L--3 (~ ~--Â®- of , 2007. OCT 1 0 2007 ! 0 \ 9) All trees to be staked or guyed. I Lay \ 2 \ /4/ I/Al P.1 - -- ' \5 4 0 2 1 10) All trees and shrubs shall be drip irrigoted and all plant materials maintained in a healthful condition. I Betty Hull Chair ---1. / 1 J 11) Conifer trees be sized as 50% eight feet tall and 50% at six feet tall, Deciduous trees sized OVERVIEW MAP as 50% at four-inch coliper and 50% at two-inch caliper. JOB NO: 501.001 SCALE 1 "=60' 12) Placement of plant material that fronts parking stalls shall conform to Estes Valley DATE: Aug 31, 2007 Development Code 7.11,0.4.d plants within overhang of vehicle bumper. SHEET: 1 of 2 43 120' Il f;~ PAVED WIDTH Ill 600' ~ R.O.W. 1200' --â€¢.DAnn eTATE HIGHWAY No. 34 1 - -= 1 -4-4 0 / n[IR I AnY OF THF MO[INTAIN EION EW TRACTS VS ADDITION R.ADO COUNT Corner 4 Ponderosa Pine 6 8 tremuloides (Aspen) 6 'Spring Snow' 3 TREES 13 SHRUBS 72 -king Lot 1 s tremuloides (Aspen) 3 ponderosa (Ponderosa Pine) 5 TREES 8 SHRUBS 26 s Existing 62 s Removed U al Existing ees Remaining 49 s Added 22 01 Trees AR #f ter Improvements 71 ibs Added 98 6" GRADE ' l ; CHANNEL SECTION ~ 4Â» SIDEW~K / E 1N f rED BASE Â·*d OCT ' 2007 d UL JE*STONE - - I... me .0-BON,41 15,~-103) 580-8408 DESIGNED BY KMP APPROVED BY _EMIL JOB NO. SHEET SHEET BUTTE 200 Esâ„¢, PA=, Co. 80614~ FAX (.70) 688--2489 DRAWN BY =!6~ DATE OCT 2007 501.001 22 CLIENT: 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC CHECKED BY RWS SCALE AS SHOWN OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAIN COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED fl I c/ I'~Mjj~~Lf .z/1-i" 1 / 11 A . . =0 . . A .A. . . /. A ... I. FA;*91//-~/I~,1~~~~ e 0-- -- :-- I. 0 D . e 0 Ill'll ......... 0 -- - 4 e 0 .0 0, . e 4 . 0 A. . A 0 / I ... 0 - . ~/ ..0 - . I - -- - 0 . ..Il I .. 1~~1=r ~ ....... 0 - . . . . .. â‚¬2- L. . , .. . â‚¬040 ...: . 0 . . 1 1111 0 0 0 .- .. .. v, / liT#VI,. I~ 15 -- F 6 4 .. / . 0 .. - . .0 4*&&42*#0*1*'A -- , . / . . / .0 "#m,t 0& .. F D 0 - a/ .- a ... 1 0 - ~~A- rAW - , 'Le - - .. #,LIM#AR* .. .6 .. '. . 3 .-0.0. 4 0 - - ... - 0 0 0 I=-.1 .50, .. . ....AA j 9. * .. I. 0 - ,~ ~,69...F &6,-0, 0 --0-01 .1 0 4 4/10 /~f,#,~ : .. ... 0 . .. ... le ... I D. ~.4 -1 Z:53,=â€¢4, .. 1 . 4.k D . I .- 0 0 - 1 - I . 6 0. I ... â€ž 1 . . A - .. . 8 0. O D .. 4 0 '-- 0 - .. 0. -. - AN~ ... 1 -----e=Cm-----1;-10000, 8 4111 .0 . . Â·â€¢,11111,111111111:1112!11 .... e . r - - 11(10 1 - ... pe: 4.1 0 0,-0 1 2 '-' . D- .al I . I D -- . 0/,0 -1 . . 44240 0 - lA 0 . 4. .0 â„¢0'L .- - 41 - - E ... 0 . %0,5 VIA . '.. . A . 0 .44~ - 43. f.- - ....... â‚¬4 ... :- 70 0/0*,m~ - I. , 90 . -: .0 ... 8 I I I I ..2 0 00 W A '. D . , 7.. ~ , *4007 --0..Dll . . 1.0 .- 004 4 . 1 .vr - .*22, A . A .. 1 . 1 .. - 0 -1 .. 0 . 0 0 . . A - 0- 1 -,41 1 . L 1.61 vox: 970.586.9140 r- fax: 970.58&9149 - 0-7 Â» 1 1 09 0 e.corn - [-1-1 h--2 7j 1-0.-1 L._~b-14 21| PORat _/LII Â© BASE 1 Lf rw.cÂ· r L---1 1-4 Ambihhimp.C. UCE UP - ~A W.C. 2 , c~:~~, GROOMS ROOM SACRISTY CLASS ROOM 1 KITCHEN < IU COUNTING ROOM 1 2- â‚¬ 1311 . TOTAL CAPACITY OF 228 NAVE UP-- ' fÂ»NCTUARY NARTHEX ~ SPACES ]N WAVE PEWS MECHANICAL- L=13 MULTI-PURPOSE AREA -3 r c ===3 rl r ELIA CLASSROOM ..=; SACRISTY IKITCHEN RL r--1. RAI4?_ re 07 6'-61/2" - 1=*1 0 1 Li- UP FLAT ROOF Issue: EXISTING b I raNTFMP, ATTON BELOW ADDITION EXISTING ENTRY ~.-,Â·/~ GARDEN ADDmoN ~ 9-7 1 Schematic v n<..\ 7 Pr --1 [1-1 - 441 r 1 f-1 -1-3 2 | L UL L 30 2 22 2 22 ~- - - - - - - - - - --~~ Date: ROSARY - - , j., RAMP - r--1-7 1 ~ -Lueer- UNDER â‚¬ -C]411 1 2007.08.22 T pi ~| El H-ANDÂ®Apr | ELEV. MEN'S UP EQUIR -11 Â¤ 5 10|16 1+IA I CUSTODIAN UP RAMP ; I~~! CONFESSIO,Al>* el i ~ 1 j ip =J L------- Cir I ' 1 H -Â® MULP-PURPOSE ~ CLASSROOM ~~ AREA ' ' rl~RLOCK _~1 - 7-11 An -, =.=~3 1 1 Ll NEW 1| 49- - V 51 -1 BELOW LOBBY ISHED ROOF ~ ____- ____[i --- --- ---H----- ----- -A---------- I] Eli h Â® 2 11 44 1 ~ - -#6LbiN@ PARTHION WAl.G~ ~ 1 l CElL] ~- EIVTRY 2.- ~ P 1' 1 PARISH HALL IS 11 1 1 ~ 2- 2-T -=29? 3 11 1 ' ' 00'0 4 1[III 1 ' LIBRARY ~ i CLASSROOM CLASSROOM 0. 1 PASTORAL .2 1 F Ph GASSROOME,1 0 AsgsrANr UP 1 =9 BRIDES ROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM ' STORAGE | ~ CLASSROOM F -7 -L l -=2 - 'EV | ' MAIN FLOOR: EXISTING 7,686 SQ FT DEACON ~ L i NEW 2,386 SQ FT . 0, EDUCATION SUPPLIES *4 1 E-5--7,~~ ~ g~ LOWER FLOOR: 1 2-6 4-@ BUSINESS MNGR. EXISTING 4,705 SQ FT : 00 DECK NEW 1,959 SQ FT N P--J Irl ~ PASTOR -gl TOTAL: DN 3 EXISTING 12,391 SQ FT 0 9 NeN 4,345 SQ FT 0 o DECK 0 1 ALL 16,736 SQ FT >D O 1 :411.. VI LE ' Im PATIO ADDITION EXISTING O 0 0 ADDrnON BaSTING . 96 ~ 2 I Lower Floor Plan 1 Main Floor Plan . X 0 1,1 3/32" = 1'-0" 382"= 1 '-0" Sheet Title: Floor Plans Sheet No: A2.0 ~ LEÂ©[ED V [E ~ A R C HI T E C T U RE P. C. ~ OCT 11 2007 ~ oot euns 'enueAÂ¥ uosdwolll 6!13 169 10 Â£:908 ope,oloo Â®ed se,sa Z L 908 ope30100 'Mied sels3 uo!*ezil f t ija &2 t i u.1 70.586.9140 TO.586.9149 =hitecture.corn BASIS Ltecture, P.C. LINE OF HEIGHT RESTRICTION (EXISTING ROOF ABOVE) ~~~142321 1=1 1 1 21 M 1 1171 .EXISTING Ill ~ADDITION NEW WOOD SHAKE ROOF vT.O. Wall _--__-- ---4 EL: 110' - 7 3/4" NATURAL STONE BENCH matic AT NEW ENTRY ROOF LINE OF EXISTING GRADE .08.22 MainFIQ0r------ -- EL: 100' - 0" --------- ritle: vations | NEW DOOR AND _/~ Sheet No: COVERED ENTRY 1-East_Elevation 1 /8" = 1'-0" A3.0 A R C H I T E C T U R E P. C. I OCT 11 2001 I 31'-1 3 4" ~ uoliezill;n=~MioluoisuEEdxg Z~ DM ... . .. D 2 .1 0 D. D. 0 D. ...:.D . . .. ... 0 0 - D. 0 - 1~~1// ,/7/X-40/ZE'Emuff#/~9"4689640&4 *:"U#*18=6 :ir'ir.%10&/SPWAKF'Mi:/ . I ./ ./. 'Â¥ -lm'...... . W, ro Â»1111111111 . ....:7:...~.'.2 - .........'. - I#/.1./.2Â·-~I..../Â¥12 /4Â¤NhaP~ ft, fid,-. &8 24%4%*OPW/M"gia"*9/(Mii:MY-- ... .... 7-- Â» *.. *:. , /*e-/1.Xt I. 3,9,63.ES=.// A. .12-:11111.. - Velilios#Iikenv.0612~~1tli':.imirwign":MIC"<illin:Wavil,&..29*":Waw<'~ il, illâ‚¬~9,191":Impl"EL/'*I'j/<ilii:wait:"i;;963 W~t~ IUM.#te:**Mit . FA=*MIL 4 *im'.pv,=0*1 1~~6~â€¢ 7 . " 1 . .1 - 4*41*A'. *%*I * ddlk lege*,MNIMIH'/ -,1.Idn 4 8. - 1,1 : . i fillit r/*110 //Fpr %! 1 i b.,8 721, 1 *'.41' *'0 - z 7,1%*v. ' + : - ~ "11 9 ./*-/H A-I-** *-.*'& I-=-#I V I I 1 - y - 44' P lili I. ..... . I. .....; /, mel.... It ~r-TA 7,1 M & 7 N 4449 4.2~ 111 , r Mwjic] kl:Â«LAG,111!JJJ]ijdl Il iI#iLJ~~JJI~<~1!111 UÂ· 4.81 .1 0 . 04.+ 1 r ... 9 '*t'.1 0 ' .#iÂ¥&*'916,ear'W~I~,4.* .., ... 1//I'll . D F.4 /4 9:40 1 1:4/:9 '*f /4 9-.- .47 - - V.41,4,4:,3 ff 11 1 40lli"li 0 ~ .: Â® . 4 k elâ€ž* 4 03#â€ž,0,fril~*i,6........*9514:6=69 .6,:gar.6,6.,. ,,din#diAA -:- +*-' - 'Pa- - V-9 -r . I 2RmÂ¥ -/ r , + it- ,-2/"../. ~1-6-1990-Ve:*1&4::rifili/Njih~~~~~~6-/.I#:7#'FL:ir:F=Ti:129*:I ./-/UÂ£94 //':t'.. 2/5. U /3....lul 2 Â¥ I. A -4~â‚¬~~69;%5*1~*2*~12~547Â»jA .W. 4 . . h. 1.h".Â¥ $ -Â»~~~ 'Nuf" d. I f..&/:4:- 7.916,//. -.Pll,164...tal / ./r#.2..49::2/2/-*/ Ilit.1-I Â¢ ' . / ./ 4Â¥Â» 6 7 i . 'Er,-,a ~22%=Em=2~me~~alme~~ e '3~;~ r - ..j.. 'VALIA %Â¥' 8.~~...~.*IligfiriFijfjPgA*#Bill%f#...,&"u...~-9.~~..~-"SF*Pi.idlilll IF~'71;t,.il,~~~~~~~~~~~~4~73~'~~*. ,: '/1.1. P#.r# :.:2'r"W .....4/4- '1:1Â¢':0=4<xEs:i 1 *Ad'.Aâ‚¬ 4 ,# . 4 -~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 i j i i i it t }ttt lit~ f & 4 1 1Â¢ 2 < j i t. 1 I j j * il f i f '1 1 6 1 1 '.tr-1 . 111 1.12 111) 4 -37. .:~:~ , 1~'14 1 - ?1.1 1 , 1 r ' Fl -'2 Milt*44:~ .. ~D ~~~~~~1:'- 3 ~~-~4 r .~z# ~tik ~ 11'f,~fij~@31(4- 'JI1111~ '124~ki;~{j~ fflf~1 :4,1,74 i'~Â«:7*9'1~,D +3 4,1,1 I 1 1 :*.r fic. 8-GMNr,4.$- -*. p:):4-, ..,t,-* 0~ 0 1 1 }ING['1 7 1~i~'f.'4'~ 13*4 :tl ,>Â·kti*/eb~~,011* 1 WF.25:00 & 19*f 1,Ralm.Eital.il~ asâ€¢-11/- 11.11 0 1, Ima . 11 0%:1 lut,1184"Wh~42~ ,;p '4 -'816 4 , t.--44.Re.4---11&541:~. 4" 9-4- i j , , 0 --0 ID . D. a *Â¥4 er&/ ..,t ,#2.6 D. . 2 11-Mt : 4 'tif 4 4 $ . I . 4'. . . R f.. 4 I / 4 9 i ~ Â·1'~:tAM., -0 - lili../.- mii....... **'~'r2Ni.:-' -'-=6==6-- I I.'-Il;f f ....... -1-0.: p . D. . .,5.C:=Â£13<1.;.~*ri,wi~rifija,(w"pparaiL#~,v- :r #razl6 *40 9*lif#Ali'Â¢'~ ;04 . . râ„¢~4,03 -LI F-*e - & *t;,~~~~~- .3... 61 - ,=2.-I...1 % ...1. --=. N- *I . 2 . F. ..7.....0 . lilli... I 4..2Â£1*2 I .==Fat ' '..1 ... SIE=Fl'. k t,I'.!rÂ¥01# A r 8 . . - - =1(1 i-TET~iftr"1*ji~*('~- lilll-CitiTmi'# f=Tig;'3lf :i~~~ ,~ ~~~~. 4~49 I --21 - ~11*Vi#,c ~+1 71 ' .'"- '4*fix 93'/t: '*/0 11:4'4113 - ~';Â·~ DEBE~ â€¢â€¢ 2.70' I ki . :'6'-i:: ..*kâ€¢5,.5,2; .....i : L-:li~,91.1..'.1 . m *ri .t Â·~% ~tdiff* "- ~ | 1 1 111~111'111 * +2 ?h D .. . 1 9; D D . 4 1-4 'MMFMY"hwmematz/$*94] I L Â·tgu.'r-:*74 . ...,iâ€¢ 14.Ti --- *4 2 k*,4 /-182,;54&2&:i.%6:1=11 . ... 1 Wi ~â‚¬1126â€žÂ» . ,/5-- ~~624Â¥*Wif>,iÂ¥~Mkt./4 f, I. 24 1 51 .F. 6, . ic /h,].9.4, Il.1'111,1,1,119*L#16':06i.~.blf *10<NG'Â®i,41*blf 11Â¥.fw - I imlitidan Fu, fil**15 ;1 i 4--1174 490 ' 9:1-4;4 - 146*~a#S At~(40~ 4 . a hi'.4,9 1%~*â€¢Prilt * 1 195"r #16:. . . Â» P, Ful <call 6.4 : - 4%132,â€ž~3 *#82)/ 10 1.27 J Â¢*-01,; i. 13'Aul; 4,216 '. 11 ==fei E ige<te,F~~~#21 - ~&9~- ~~~2 v fi -941 9 f'y:; rÂ»Â· .... -' j I -7 .lka 0, r. #.,10*fiÂ£ Sfga ~0 1%,t* , 1 . /. r r . - Wapiti Crossing (Dp 07-13) ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CX) 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: October 16,2007 REOUEST: Approval to build forty-two multi-family dwellings. I Ila / / = USFS ' LOCATION: Southwest corner of Lexington Lane and Highway 7, within the Town of Estes Park. =. USFS 9 1 - 9-59- APPLICANT: t.jo ILL -L 6 2: n Mil USFS PROPERTY OWNER: Lexington Lane RM. igtms-* LLC (2995 Canyon Blvd Suite 250, Boulder, CO) STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) SITE DATA TABLE: Consultant Team: ArchitecUsite planning: The Mulhern Group (Steve Loos) Engineering: Cornerstone Engineering (Mike Todd) Parcel Number: 2531105022 Development Area: 5.65 acres (+/-) Number of Lots: One Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use: Multi-family residential Existing Zoning: "RM" Multi-family Adjacent Zoning- East: "RM" Multi-family North: "R" Residential (1/4 acre) West: "E" Estate (1/2 acre) South: "E" Estate (1/2 acre) Adjacent Land Uses- East: Multi-family residential North: Single-family residential West: Single-family residential South: Single-family residential Services- Water: Town Sewer: EPSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer th PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to build forty- two multi-family residential units on a currently undeveloped 5.9-acre acre parcel. The property is currently zoned "RM" Multi-Family (the property has been zoned for multi-family development since the adoption ofzoning in 1961). The units are planned to be a mix of detached (10 units), duplex (2), triplex (6), and a multi-family building (24). Site access would be from one point on Lexington Lane, with a through street to Highway 7, aligned with Golf Course Road. REVIEW CRITERIA: This development plan is subject to applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Zoning Requirements. Land Use. The proposed land use is allowed in the "RM" Multi-Family district. Density. The proposed density is 7.8 units per acre (42 units into 5.356 acres), where the "RM" district has a maximum density of 8 units per acre; therefore, this proposal meets density requirements. The existing cabin is proposed to be used for an "auxiliary dwelling/club house." This unit should be kept in common ownership and the use restricted (not for residential or accommodations use) through the condominium process. Impervious Coverage. The "RM" district has a maximum impervious coverage of 50%, the proposed 38% complies with this requirement. Impervious coverage will be verified with the required as-built plans. Floor Area Ratio. The "RM" district has a floor area ratio of.30; the proposed .30 FAR complies with this requirement. Floor Area Ratio will be monitored throughout the development process. Pedestrian Amenities and Linkage Requirements. Table 4-8 requires provision for pedestrian linkages. The proposed sidewalk system complies with this requirement. Setbacks. This proposal requires ten-foot setbacks on the west and south property lines, twenty-five feet from the east property line, fifteen feet from the north property line, and fifteen feet from the interior street line. The development plan complies with these requirements. Page #2 - Wapiti Crossing, Development Plan 07-13 Comprehensive Plan. Section 3.8.D requires development plans be consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. The Estes Valley Plan includes several Community Wide Policies focusing on Land Use, Community Design, Growth Management, Mobility and Circulation, Housing, and Scenic and Environmental Quality. It is Staff's opinion the proposed development plan complies with applicable policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Specific examples include: â€¢ Urban land use should occur within the Town limits of Estes Park. â€¢ Facades should be broken up with windows, doors or other architectural features to provide visual relief. â€¢ Encourage infill of older core areas in order to reduce infrastructure costs and to stabilize residential neighborhoods. â€¢ Promote street system connections between developments and promote an interconnected roadway system throughout the community which minimizes cul-de-sacs. â€¢ Encourage housing infill within the existing urban area. Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2.D requires the Decision Making Body approve proposed Limits of Disturbance for all development plans. This section includes criteria for establishing Limits of Disturbance. It is Staff' s opinion the proposed LOD meet these criteria. The southern portion of the site is to remain undisturbed; the remainder of the site does not contain any significant natural features such as rock outcroppings, streams, wetlands, forest, or steep slopes. Tree and Vegetation Protection. Existing trees to remain shall be fenced for protection prior to any site work. The area of tree protection fencing should be clearly delineated on the development plan. Tree protection fencing shall comply with standards set forth in Appendix D.VIII. Landscaping and Buffers. The proposed landscaping plan does not meet requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code. For example, the western property line, measuring 880 linear feet, requires 70 evergreen trees; 41 are proposed. The western buffer plan also includes 23 deciduous trees. The southern landscaping buffer also does not contain enough proposed landscaping within the mandated twenty foot buffer (there are several trees that are located within fifty feet of the property line, outside the proposed limits of disturbance). Page #3 - Wapiti Crossing, Development Plan 07-13 Section 7.5.(2 allows that the planning commission may authorize alternatives to the quantities set forth in the development code, provided that the applicant submits a detailed landscaping plan and that the planning commission determines that the proposed landscaping plan satisfies the purpose and intent of the development code. Staff suggests the proposed landscaping plan satisfies the purpose of district buffering. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. No lighting fixture shall be higher than fifteen feet above ground. This includes parking lot and security lighting. A lighting "cut sheet" will need to be submitted for Staff review prior to issuance of first building permit. Off-Street Parking and Loading. This proposal requires ninety-four parking spaces; one hundred and fourteen will be provided. The parking requirement table should be amended. The parking requirement table should also be updated to reflect the reduction in density. Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Electric. All electric service is to be placed underground. Drainage/Water Quality Management. All required drainage facilities shall be installed and accepted in accordance with Section 7.12.F, which allows 25% of building permits to be issued prior installation ofthe drainage facilities. Sanitary Sewer will be provided by an existing main located along Highway 7. Water will be provided by a proposed main located along the interior street. Fire Protection. Two additional fire hydrants are proposed. Per Section 7.12.G, all required fire protection requirements shall be installed prior to issuance of a building permit. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Page #4 - Wapiti Crossing, Development Plan 07-13 Public Works has noted that CDOT should approve the access design prior to approval of the development plan. Building Department. The Applicant should contact Will Birchfield (577-3728) to discuss building department issues such as grading and building permit requirements, and the American with Disabilities Act. Conduits. Per Section 7.13, "conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be screened, covered or painted to minimize visual impacts." Construction Plans. Final construction plans shall be approved by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department and UTSD prior to issuance of the grading permit and/or first building permit. Easements/Rights-of- Way. All proposed easements and rights-of-way dedications should be dedicated prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. This may be accomplished through an amended plat or condominium process. Other. The following changes should be made to the plan: 1) The rectangular shaped box near the northwest property corner should be removed. 2) The line located twenty feet from the west property line should be removed. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Stafffinds: 1. The Public Works Director has requested the development plan be continued pending CDOT approval. 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan and the Estes Valley Development Code. 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 4. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for the development plan. Therefore, Staff recommends CONTINUANCE of the proposed "Wapiti Crossing" Development Plan 07-13. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move CONTINUANCE of Development Plan 07-13 "Wapiti Crossing" pending access approval from CDOT. Page #5 - Wapiti Crossing, Development Plan 07-13 ESTES PARK COLORADO Town of Estes Park Memo Public Works Engineering Room 100, Municipal Building P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 TO: Dave Shirk, Planner 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org From: Scott Zum PE, Director of Public Works Date: September 28,2007 Re: Wapiti Crossing, 1041 S. Saint Vrain After reviewing Development Plan 07-13 the Public Works Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. After staff review of the re-submittal for the above referenced development proposal the Public Works Dept. finds that the submittal did not address several conditions and was found to be incomplete. It is our recommendation that the development plan be denied until the applicant addresses staffs previous requests and submits a complete set of documents addressing staffs conditions of approval. Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum ESTES[&;R|PARK COLORADO To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 8/22/2007 Re: Wapiti Crossing Condominiums, Lot 22, S. St. Vrain Addition, 1041 S. St. Vrain Avenue After review of the Development Plan 07-13 the Light and Power and Water Departments have the following comments: Light and Power Department comments; 1) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4) The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5) Easements also need to accompany all existing primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 6) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 7) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 8) All primary electric must be buried 4' deep in a 3" conduit for single phase and 4" conduit for three phase with warning tape at 2'. All secondary must be buried 2' deep with warning tape at l' in the appropriately sized conduit for the conductor. 9) We will need to meet with the developer to determine exact cost and location of proposed facilities. 10) Streetlights will need to be relocated at developer's expense should the existing ones conflict with proposed entrances. 11) Submit plans from the project electrical engineer for Town review and approval. 12) It does not appear that an electrical engineer was instrumental in the development of the utilities plan, there is no electrical engineers stamp and the number of proposed transformers is excessive. Please contact our Line Superintendent-Todd Steichen at 970-577-3602 for review of the engineered plan when it is ready. Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum ESTES l"'1 PARK 4 COLORA00 13) A metering plan will also need to accompany the engineered electrical plan. 14) It will be necessary to deepen the existing underground (3) phase primary electric line if the proposed Highway 7 entrance goes in as shown. 15) We will need to know the size of each individual service, type of heat and whether or not air conditioning is being proposed. Water Department Comments; 1) A Water Main Extension will be required for service, including Fire Protection. This infrastructure must be installed, testing preformed/passed and accepted by the Department prior to issuance of any building permits. Any project phasing of the water main infrastructure must be submitted with 'the construction drawings for approval prior to construction. 2) Construction drawings are required for the project. Drawings must be approved and signed by the Utilities Director or designated representative prior to anv construction. All water line design and construction shall be done according to the Water Utility Policies and Standards. All water main lines and easements must be deeded to the Town of Estes Park. Construction drawings must include: â€¢ Plan and profile to show potential conflicts between water and other utilities including culverts, show Utility Easement locations when utility is not in Road Right of Way. â€¢ Metering/Tap location plan (drawing) indicating tap locations, meter sizing, meter locations, and addresses served by each. 3) If the structure is required to have a Fire Suppression System a 'Fire Sprinkler System Connection Application' must be completed and submitted to the Water Department before any connection is granted. This application must include a detailed drawing noting: â€¢ Location, sizing and type of backflow prevention device(s) â€¢ Engineered flow requirements for the fire sprinkler system â€¢ Spill control method for proper disposal of discharge from the relief valve, indicating location and sizing of drainage capable of accommodating the discharge that could occur Due to fire line size both a chlorination and pressure test will be required, conducted by a representative of the Water Department prior to acceptance. Any Fire Suppression line servicing a building from the water main is a private service line and must be noted as such on the Development Plan and the Subdivision Plat. Future repair or maintenance required on this service is the sole responsibility of the building owner. Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum ESTES|BE|PARK COLORADO 4) Branch lines off the proposed 8" water main are private services and must be indicated as such on the Development Plan and the Subdivision Plat. 4" supply line to Units Al -A6 4" supply line to Units A7-A12 2" supply line to Units A13-A15 Future repair or maintenance required on these services is the sole responsibility of the building owner(s). 5) All irrigation systems are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for isolation purposes. The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Technician upon installation and annually there after. GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 August 17, 2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-13 - Application - Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Dear Mr. Shirk: I have no comment. I f you have ally questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. ~Vei~ Truly>yÂ·ours, A Gr~(~ry A. White GAW/ldr ~ U 4 CC: Cornerstone Engineering, Mike Todd Fax: 970/586-2459 Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 8051 7 August 16,2007 Dave Shirt Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 8051 7-1 200 RE: Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Dear Dave Shirk, Upon review of the proposed Development Plan for the above mentioned property the District has the following comments: 1. The District would like to thank the development and Cornerstone Engineering for the qualily of thought shown in their sewer utilily plan. It complies with the Districfs rules and regulations for sewer, 2, Please note that the line providing service to the 24 unit multi-family development will need to be eight-inch. Also any clean outs in or along side of the driveway or roadway will need to have approved slip top covers. 3. Easements will need to be defined on the plat. The District has a policy of not al- lowing trees, either planted or naturally growing within our easement. This will need to be observed. 4. System investment fees will apply for all new units. Thank you. Sincerely, Â£324 IrAEÂ©@13Â£~ 1 James Duell ~IM r - ~ District Manager Ift AUG 16EW Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official |*'414 I)ate: Jityt7,2007 Subject: Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Lot 22, South Saint Vrain Addition 1041 S. St. Vrain Ave. The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for Development Plan for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. Please see attached Development Plan Review Checklist comments. Review Date: August 24,2007 Review By: Will Birchfield, CBO DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 1041 S. St. Vrain Ave. ~ Official street names and addresses shall be assigned by the Department of Building Safety. There is currently a Shady Lane, which would not be contiguous with this Development. South Shady Lane should not be used. U Condominiums must submit (to the Department of Building Safety) any address changes before the preliminary condominium map is approved. Process fees will be assessed unless the address change is included with the original building permit application. El A detailed site plan is required and shall include utility locations, setbacks, contours, drainage, landscaping, access, easements, etc. U A grading and drainage plan shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U Grading plans and permits are required prior to and are separate from building permits. A grading permit is required prior to any grading or excavation (Estes Park Municipal Code Â§14.12.030) El The limits of site disturbance shall be maintained and are restricted to within the property lines and/or to areas specified on the approved plans. C] Prior to any excavation and/or construction activity, a detailed drainage/erosion plan to protect neighboring properties, public right-of-ways and drainage areas during the construction phase shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Filtration of storm water is required prior to release from the site. Failure to comply with said approved plans may result in an immediate stop work order on the entire development. The final site drainage plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department. U The foundation systems, including mitigation of potential water problems shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. C] Foundation setback and elevation certificates shall be provided by a Colorado design Professional, and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. Il A construction traffic plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works and Police Departments prior to obstructing or interfering with any vehicular traffic on public right-of-ways. C-Dot shall approve all construction activity on State Highways (Hwy 34, 36 and 7). \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-1041 S. St. Vrain Ave.doc Revised 10/17/2006- CB U The developer shall specify the intended uses of all dwelling units. Are they intended to be private dwelling (owner occupied), long term rentals (apartments), or short term rentals (nightly accommodations)? There are specific code requirements (accessibility, life safety, etc.) for each use. D All new construction shall comply with all applicable accessibility laws. It is the designers' and developers' responsibilities to comply with laws that Town staff does not have the authority to interpret nor the responsibility to enforce, such as ADA, Federal and State Fair Housing Acts, etc. Additionally, the designer shall specifically detail how the proposed development shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the 2003 IBC, Chapter 11. Detailed accessibility specs are required. U Approval of the Condominium Map is not an approval to.change the use from short term (less than 30 days) to long term (greater than thirty days) and vice versa. Such change of use requires approval of the Chief Building Official, which will entail on site inspections and possibly life-safety and accessibility improvements. U Compliance with the accessibility requirements of CRS 9-5 is required, and includes an implementation plan prior to issuance of any building permits. U Minimum one hour fire-resistance-rated construction is required between all dwelling units. El All appendages, such as decks and roofs must be shown on the plans, including building footprint details and construction details. U Building permits are required prior to any construction and/or remodeling. Provide distance in between detached single family dwellings. El A Building permit is required for temporary construction office trailers. U A Building permit is required for fences over six feet in height. U Sign permits are required and are separate from building permits. Both sign locations need to be dimensioned on the site plan. Must be minimum 8' from property line, comply with EVDC. Refer to Appendix D for Visibility. Lighting to comply with EVDC 7.9. ' U All requirements of the approved development plan shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of approved variances shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of Planning Commission conditions of approval shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U A pre-construction meeting with Town staff and construction contractors is required prior to issuance of building permits. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-1041 S. St. Vrain Ave.doc Revised 9/19/2006- CB C C CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ~r (k= ~ SURVEYING INC October 8,2007 OCT - 8 2007 =8 Mr. Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter of Intent for the "Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Development" Parcels Number 25311-05-022. Dear Dave, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of our client Lexington Lane, LLC are pleased to submit plans for Lot 22, South Saint Vrain Addition to the Town of Estes Park. vners/Lien Holders The current owners are Lexington Lane, LLC, and Horizon Banks, NA. Boulder Branch is the current lien holder. Adiacent Zoning Current zoning of the subject property is "RM-Multi-familf'. The adjacent properties to the south and the west are zoned E-Estate. The properties to the north across Lexington Lane are zoned R-Residential. The properties to the east across Highway 7 are zoned RM-Multi-family. Proiect Description The project involves the development of 5.882 acres into a Multi-family condominium development. A log cabin structure, constructed around 1938, currently exists in the southeast corner of the property. The existing cabin is to remain as an auxiliary building to be used as a club house for the development. The owner is proposing to construct 42 additional units (9 single family units, two du-plex buildings, two tri-plex buildings and a 24 unit multi-family building). â€¢ Trash Enclosure: o A trash enclosure is not provided for the single family, du-plex and tri-plex units; we are proposing individual trash service for these areas. o For the 24 unit Multi-family building a trash enclosure is to be located outside the garage door. â€¢ Postal Cluster Boxes: A postal cluster box is proposed to be located along the west side of Golf Course Road in front ofthe multi-family structure. â€¢ Street Name and Address: Golf Course Road is proposed for the street name. The proposed addressing for the development is "1010 through 1017 Golf Course Road, Unit #Al", Etc. The address unit number corresponds with the unit numbers shown on the development plan. â€¢ Sign: A low profile sandstone entrance sign is proposed at the south entrance to Wapiti Crossing. ( Letter of Intent for the "Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Development" Parcels Number 25311-05-022. Page 2 of 4 October 8,2007 â€¢ Building Heights A building height table with schematic drawings has been included with the submittal. Access Current access to the subject property is from the west off of South Saint Vrain Ave. Additional Access is proposed off of Lexington Lane from the north. The two accesses will allow for a through street. The access road is proposed as a 27 foot dedicated public right ofway. Nine foot easements are proposed along either side of the proposed right of way. The nine foot easements either side of the public right of way will allow for drainage, utilities and pedestrian sidewalks. Maintenance of the improvements within the nine foot easements will be the responsibility of the Home Owners Association The public road is to be constructed to meet current Town ofEstes Park street standards. The road will be 24 feet wide with curb and gutter and a 5 foot sidewalk. The proposed access offof Lexington Lane is located adjacent to an existing private drive serving two residences to the west of the proposed development. We are requesting a variance to the driveway separation to allow Golf Course Road to access the property at the northwest corner o f the property. Site Statistics Gross Land Area - 256,216.99 SF 5.882 ACRES Less 7.5' Right of Way Dedication - 2,475.8 SF Less 27' Public Right o f Way -20,449 SF Net Land Area - 233,292.19 SF 5.356 ACRES Allowable Maximum NET Density (Units/SF): Town Home Units 16 @ 2201.5 SF 35,224 SF 2 @ 1600 SF 3,200 SF Multi-Family Unit 24 30,000SF NET DENSITY TOTAL 42 units 69,915 SF Existing Log Cabin 1 @ 1,494 SF 2,161 SF (Auxiliary Dwelling/Club House) TOTAL DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA 233,292.19 SF Net Land Area per Unit 5,554 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO 30 % Land Area Coverage Statistics Coverage %Lot Existing Land Use Existing Cabin 1491 sf 0.64% Proposed Land Use Buildings 44,539 sf 19.09% Drives/Driveways 27,733 sf 11.88% ( Letter of Intent for the "Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Development" Parcels Number 25311-05-022. :e 3 0 f 4 tober 8,2007 Sidewalks/Entryways/Patio 15,060 sf 6.46% TOTAL 88,823 sf 38.07% OPEN SPACE (50% Required by EVDC) 144,469 sf 61.92% ISO Calculations ISO calculations have been performed and show the property meets proposed needs with the addition of two fire hydrants as shown in the "Fire Hydrant Locations" Exhibit. Proiect Phasing Phase 1 will consist of required infrastructure, private drive, driveway pods, sidewalks, boundary landscaping and detention area. Phase 2 Following completion ofPhase 1, the 24 unit multi-family structure, the existing log cabin renovation and associated landscaping will be constructed. Phase 3 Following completion of Phase 2, Units Al through A15 will be constructed on a sales based time line. Utilities Utility services will be provided as follows: ater Town of Estes Park A Town of Estes Park 8" water main is located along the northern edge of the proposed development in the Lexington Lane right o f way. We are proposing to run a lateral 8"DIP main south off of the existing 8" main in Lexington Lane approximately 800 feet along Golf Course Road and connect to the existing main on the east side of Highway 7 for a loop feed. Lateral services will extend offthe main to service the individual units. Additional fire hydrants are proposed at the north and south end of the main extension. All units are to be individually metered. Electric Town of Estes Park The electrical service for Wapiti Crossing will utilize a primary junction box along the east edge of the property to run a primary loop through the proposed development. All new electrical primary and secondary are to be located underground. All units will be individually metered. The property is currently included in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District per the Larimer County Assessors' information. The overhead electrical currently providing service to the existing log structure is to remain. Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District An existing 8" sewer main with manholes is located along the east property line in the highway right ofway. New 8" sewer mains are to be extended west from the existing main to service the proposed development. e property is in the process ofpetitioning into the Sanitation District. Gas Excel Excel will serve the subject property. C Q Letter of Intent for the "Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Development" Parcels Number 25311-05-022. Page 4 of 4 October 8,2007 Traffic Impact Analvsis A traffic impact analysis has been prepared Krager and Associates, Inc. and is included in this submittal. Storm Water Management Plan A storm water drainage report has been completed for the subject property and is included with the submittal package. The property includes two drainage basins with storm water disperses to the north and south along Highway 7. Detention ponds are proposed for each basin. A detention pond, for the northern basin is proposed at the north east corner of the property. The proposed detention pond is to contin 0.08 acre feet of water with a two year release rate of 1.8 efs and not to exceed a release rate of 6.8 efs during the 100 year event. The detention basin for the southern portion o f the property is proposed at the south west corner of the multi-family structure. The proposed detention basin is to contain 0.02 acre feet of water with a two year release rate of 0.3 efs and not to exceed 1.2 efs during the 100 year event. The release rate is based on the acceptable conveyance through the existing storm drainage facilities down gradient. Sidewalk The 5 foot sidewalk is proposed along the north side of the property in the Lexington Lane right of way. A 5 foot sidewalk is also proposed along the southern side of Golf Course Road from Lexington Lane back to the south entrance offHighway 7. An 8 foot sidewalk is to follow the highway right ofway from the south entrance back north to Lexington Lane. Right of Wav and Easements Lexington Lane along the northern property line is currently a 30 right of way. An additional 7.5 feet ofright of way is proposed along the south side o f Lexington Lane. We request that the additional right o f way be dedicate by a deed of dedication. We request that easement for proposed utility mains and the public right of way through wapiti crossing be dedicated with the condominium map. This will allow exact fits of the easement without having to make any modifications following construction. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Landscaping Wapiti Crossing Development is requesting a variance to the required landscaping buffer along the south property line (district buffer) from adding additional trees or shrubs. All proposed improvements are set back approximately 150 feet from the boundary with existing trees and rock outcroppings and topographical relief providing good visual barrier. In addition the installation of additional vegetation with irrigation will probably do more harm than good. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. A/,ar Michael Todd, PE. Principal - Of ESTES VALLEY c %FEEÂ©Ik~iMp~ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIO Submittal Date: 7/24/2007 |1~ JUL 25 2001 1 -~~ - -4 - Type of Application F Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Con~lominium Map 1 r Special Review f- ROW or Easement Vacation r heliminary Map T- Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change E Final Map 1- Preliminary Subdivision Plat 1- Time Extension 1- Supplemental Map 1- Final Subdivision Plat E Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat F Amended Plat General Information Project Name Wapiti Crossing Condominiums Project Description Multi-family Condominium Development Project Address 1041 S. Saint Vrain Legal Description Lot 22, South Saint Vrain Addition to Estes Park Parcel ID # 25311-05-022 Section 31 Township 5 Range 72 Site Information Total Development Area (e.g., lot size) in acres 5.882 Existing Land Use Single family residence Proposed Land Use Multi-family condominium development Existing Water Service ,R' Town r Well r None F Other (specify) Proposed Water Service R Town E Well F None r Other (specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD r UTSD ;F Septic E None Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service * EPSD r UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes W' No Existing Gas Service * Xce 1 r Other F None Existing Zoning RM - Multi-family Proposed Zoning RM - Multi-family Site Access (if not on public street) Lexington Lane & Hwy 7 Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes ~Â¥ No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? ~1 Yes E No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Michael Todd Complete Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Estes Park CO 80517 Attachments 10 Application fee Ii7. Statement of intent 1/3 copies (folded) of plat or plan IF/11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan IF/klames & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlandsÂ·report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park a P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue a Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev C Primary Contact Person is r Owner 5 Applicant f ConsultanVEngineer Record Owner(s) Lexingtton Lane, LLC I Mailing Address 2595 Canyon Blvd. Suite 250, Boulder CO 80302 - (30319%-1301 4 Cell Phone (30â‚¬) 531 - W3 } Email Jr!@loftusdevelopments.corn , Applicant The Mulhem Group, LTD Mailing Address 1730 Blake Street Suite 435, Denver CO 80202 1 Phone (303) 297-3334 Cell Phone (303) 596-5710 Fax (303) 292-2601 Email sloos~themulhemaroup.com Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park CO 805' -L ~ EÂ©ED Â¥*31 Phone (970) 586-2458 Cell Phone (970) 214-7318 Fax (970) 586-2459 ~ JUL 2 5 2007 Email mtoddaces-ecc.corn U APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule induded in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT 614104) 6, Al-0 1 1,05 2 to Aus: *AG et Applicant PLEASE PRINT: 'tNE Uoule,VJ *Aour, 011,2 #WALâ€¢tatt. G. Uuutteu hed~pix, 1 Signatures: i Record Owner Le*? be#~i Date 71247 / Applicant>tÂ£2Â»-Â· M.t~. Date 7 /4+E 7 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ? I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application lam acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property ? In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement l acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) ? I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVE)C, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application, (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.corn/ComDev/DevCode.) ? I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVE)C ? I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate: or submitted after the deadline date. ? I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. ? The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. ? I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property dunng the review of this application, ? I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has beoome null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT LNJU41'DA) bue iLLâ‚¬ 442, 144, A~WAq.eÂ£ Applicant PLEASE PRINT: 1*t AWL*t)43 a}Uvf, \23. '466141, G..AAUU<"20 'Â¥Mde.dt Signatures: *0Â£/t RA~*l L~ZA, Record OwneO.704 Date 7/94-jÂ« MUJ.Lle. AILf,L. (944,Â»evf Sate 1411*101 f~Â®Â©Euvel-~ ~ JUL 2 5 2007 ! Jp Revised 06/26/07 t=Ng Ah AN h ANN : -hhhAN N E.*832 59/5 8@@ 00@@20@Â§FRE 00080@wegeÂ®E@@@@90@26*woe-RÂ©88 0000 â€¢-to*ooco g.coooÂ¥,02@cv@22ig:8*22928Â©cococoÂ°Â°co=-0 - 40 -glib6O00 .90000 625O0000noOLC)03000<DoN@00 ..-t-20000050000- 20&|ONO0 NO006@ZAOUOUO6OÂ«0@00000Â§0002' c-0000000-O912m5Â©O :â‚¬00 Q *â‚¬â‚¬46-2 0 c m â‚¬ â‚¬ O -6 -6-60.â‚¬-60â‚¬4Â£aâ‚¬50 -O .2 2%11 2 -6-2-2 22 f ul g c Â£ E - m .2 Â£ E L f 2 222 295.@22 822 82 &20 2 zE.6 68 5.2 82 -g,m M @ 28 M Z m IN~~3822~gEÂ®0*~g~~~~0%0E-ene~ a. 0- a. al 0- c-al 294#562522 8822>>2%22Â£125*2*J 2-CE 'DO.CE 8-M E & 3 32 52 Ji 08 5 3 -,8 w J w w u905 * z Â£6 M Dr t r rn M w un w w 5 Eu. Un 28~0;303~M 92 9 %0388 f 05 - 6 0, R i 2 a) <<&502Eal ,> 21>1=2 ~ 3% )< 912139Â· - m % â‚¬ 9 . 1 1 1 2%3 1 -1= 2 ; a== di & 0 =-3 2.8 i im â‚¬ E CD = 00 0 Râ€žgÂ£8000".6.00Â·~r:320*0Â£&2 k.2.% 11 Aifcvaipâ€¢ 2- 35i*i*=m*a ~~~~ ~ ~ujch,ildfic~w ~ EPuSjouS~@~ gziuika2Â£ ~ulm ~~ 5%â‚¬EEEZi*~ k CO W moopoo w oc,meocoo ~CO- LO OWOLOO OLD M NutrieoZ-mho C *t ~2 9 ? & 08 8* A Ai R mo M ~ @ 8& 25 8 9 0 058 z,8 2 %2 80 8 *o E o o BE m ~ 26 0,00 8 2 0 >,O * 00 0- ,- e.- r. recya. r--C)COCU O. O. 91Â· r N- C) â€¢-O.-LO O. --COLO COCD--10- a. CD r 8 6- C 1- ED=m- C 11 10 (D >, -g 2 8 -6 % 7= bc .2 C U 0 <m-5 <t=ki=â‚¬ cd, 23 C >, m :.* 25.- a) n >8 43 * >%.fe ~ 2 2 2 4 i,36.flat:&00&.WOO , A â‚¬ m U) O Â® - JUIâ€¢6060 god -i r , 2 M , .E -2 5 1 5/0-S V (5 0 06 O 822:238:111090 Â· CD 0 J (D 1- (1) E m 2 - 2 g 52 A 5520(5 el ~* rf CC 0 0 OUJUJ *8 Eli~t ~@Ec EZ 00@ 1-04- cc 9-c agciJJLL:uit:-Soz':Jleige:$13zt~af E 4 J ui 6 1 < ' 2 d E E m e g @ c Â·a R e W > c .c = j E a w . 5 0 2 -2 2 2 92 Lli 0 % Z =%03â‚¬1~2 cem=122282%#EEâ‚¬81~EESNEN~#gENE#tl2@E#5~Eg-311EE@ C J a .C & 9 10 = ..3 0 Â£ m E m 13Ega S= <co-,m-il fo DI8 1<0â‚¬~200,=03 0â‚¬040 -*UJ m DIOLLI am,>como-,moLLI Dale P. Stapleton 4-3950 8994-68[0 leeJE MeO 804 ne gote-eSSOCU~~ 6~3 WeeqM enueAv Owner Owner 11 ~50~St. Vr ain Ave., #Bl 80517 Becky L. Cash, Co-trustees 1 ,#Al ,#A4 cle, #2 ~lt,Brown cle, #1 u!'Â·UOOI K~lk#'2us'ul elow PO Z.Z L PBOW , #Ll ,#D6 :Unn :srul Al,lue:I ' *9# "eAV uieJ rustee 7th Avenue 19 Leigh A. Wolfe-Dawson E. 147th Avenue Box 1084 Duddleston Manor ouston , S *SOL Placer Court Ruth E. Wise ffrey S. / Janice A. Boubelik Susan L. Lindell-Caudillo emeld 'V or e XpeIN n A. Dannels e L-ZO da sopuoo 6uissoo mdeM 81!eH V N ' UeAe LO E RumÂ§EgESEEeE REzEEN~ ED -~ A*Â©CU555 14 ANANAN 0296*Â§3Â§2222@R@822 822 08 Â®2*897g 6- @8&188888 8~0888:8880 N ~ co 00 co co 00 r 00 6 00 00 00 0 00 00 co %Â§09000Â°06000Â°9Â°8Â°Â°2889Wwoo 808QOCA00000*00000J000 N cou- 0 0 0 0-0 EOUOOZOCDOO 1800 Â°Â°0002600000#0000060000 0 /0 96 6 92- 2 9( l=li 2 â‚¬â‚¬â‚¬â‚¬v-Â·669 *â‚¬2. 12- 2. 0. &-1 2 92- -<8*aâ‚¬*â‚¬22â‚¬ic-422â‚¬ipâ‚¬ ~%2~22Cm =02222Â§2122~224*322 Â· ~gcoa-Â·%00-0-0.0-0-EQ-0.0-0-0-Ea- o co m co co *3 li Â£E â‚¬ @ co m M Â·22 5.t;ggrE.*1455 0 0 EFF Â®tit; 0.9)Â£9# 548 %-ED; 8.*tit; 10 0 0 9 0 0 0 0,0 11Â£ --0 : 1 8 8 g 1 51,0 u, 0 5 K g m E 5 8 2 E m :â‚¬ co O W u' 6,3 E Z 8 8 E % $ m .% E @ -8 .% '5 1% .E .% 3 3 O < U.1 JUJUJUJR OLLIWUJUJUJ* LU LI W LLI BUJUJumuLLILLI -10 JoiUJU. 2] Ill Ill LU LU LLILI LU OUJUJLLIJ IN W al 2%# Â§3Â£ 9 - -1 (D - I * CD co 62 E **2*310 0, Eis 3365 23 *i m-mills* 3 -mil-*2 22 b-~2Â¥el -~2 44â‚¬14,2 (1) CD (D Â® (D 02@Oacecrac.= 0 O <6-Jeeo E EBOE @ 3.@.2-@.a: E i ze g g @ 2 -08 *> H *1= 8,> â‚¬ 13 & 8 1= . ~MEE 88 %,2 05 2 *> 59Â§200>>>3>SE 2 *200&%;NN cx~.25& 09 cz~ ~c6 ~ ~0~~~~,~ijll 02,Lege~~~m~E xou~~u~vawcd8 C i g) C - Â·=- -O &55%~ cm g SE ~ ECIE u-Ojib-=e $ 1- E ill [1 0 -2 0*/1 % 92 EMMÂ§ 5*94854 ZMM E 000010.00.Â·wjâ€žmail,0*W=-- on' 00-00â€ž0AmoooÂ®gek LO 200Â§22Â§*A&23Â§69@5Â§@E*@28Â£58*88792822:588:05:5ao-~ rE-Broo-â€¢-Acy---09.--0.-r,-4.-â€ž W U) S H Q O 16 g 9 0, .1 H= ~ 3 E Â§2 2 gu d 2 3 R .& i 2 %4 Â·# ~ 2 5 1 3 ~ Ei -C J $ ~ * Â£9 8 â‚¬.0 =: < 8 -2 2):E & 2 4 % 2. 2 -0 B. ~ Z E E % f 3 :6 .gl % .0 E .5 61 m .3% 5 JI ~' 46=A< S SEEÂ°68.SCMÂ«'gÂ·=Ao=3288%Â·92 â‚¬ 16Â·cmu'eÂ·*RocÂ»2906=(D=* 850 cr 2 m â‚¬ 0 m %*d C&06 $221 5-Tâ‚¬3*. Â£,ANMi MT,%8l.idamz#52" 50-05ic.60~a,60-~=mdv 2.JE'u*12212*22JJIWEINg:0134/1*Eigra 6-C EnDDJECDON m c 5 2 Re 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 = 3 3 6 25 $ 2 18 2 E E E < -1 2 U. w < 5 -2 22 1 051(Or-%21.Zoom-;jdbowÂ·Ecis en Â® u.9.g (D E m /25 E m c i [0 9 :5 h g 8 @ ~E -@ â‚¬ .c m m .- m :i o o 22 -g o g 2.g -S @ m R, :9 @ c & 2 g Y = = 0 8 r =2:69â‚¬<E.2 O _j e m M o r u- -1 o o t- o n. * Or -J IC (r u j o m < -1 < O -5 0 -1 0 -g $,- a- z R- % 2 0 5 2 0 â‚¬ ~ 2 â‚¬ 0 0 380t,-8 88 1.8 ont CO 8 01 1=Z eLLIEWon ~~~h~~~ycraft Circle, #1 Owner 11 Address o einjecl -S . Johnson, Revocable Trust Thomas L. Bellmann Susan K. O'Connor Genevieve Ann Baker 1Srul elqe00/\88 fi 'ME:rey Carol Rouch E PLO cIa sopuoo BuissoJO !1!deM #opuew 'IN uee ( f 62 -M-Â°m-"----@~~5 66 535 A-h*-hANANN 2.cy=%u,%0.5.0*EMMEME#28*Oso Lo O tO 00 1-, in O.- O to 0000 O 4 9-0:00<0000000000008.9018030$0000 NISO~OU-0 000000 d/00.000 -OUO 000 f U f f # #61 5 1 1 % 1 4 #-* 8 *Â·6% ff W Â·68Â·62 4-# 4 a. a. a) a. = a. a. a.a-a- a. 0000..- a. d a. 0 0. m a. a. 0- U, CA 00 20 m co 0 0 co Emj coÂ·a . 3 0 E 0 -* 0 . m ffil= E 83EAE &15,1 8~3%532 8@222&222 U.U.UJ-tow]&2wewint8w - 00 * c -0 U 5 g. *t #t di C 3 - 0 2/0 3 2%*Ng A L.=ck.= af * E.E..gw~,0399=0 . _ oem-Ogs-5323 2% I m 2 , , 3 1 1 fi :e , 1 9255Â£0~ ~al *EN/Sigw@3 &30*1~ 58 co *O*29 00-- 04.0-8 86553ujuiEtui36:210&5 :*m otin.u.Ou-Za)(0 8 8=26 .* CO ~hOOM IP 10 -10 WO N CO O CO ~ LD O 10 CV .- CVOOÂ© CO LD >W 02555 Sgo g & 060&191!3 %5! 3:8 53!00 <00 fiER@Â§FE-- râ€ž ---a-huha- .c, re- In - mo- a. g a; C C CO 2 2 c & 2%% 8 8 (1) C m Â·c (D 2Â£ - 010 - **16 2 OMEL# E & 425 50% O Ea ~~2Â£~4 32 553$ ~~ct :' 2 2 .2 - -NEE=-fE & ca: 12041596i' - 060)06061 EJE,Q.Em Â®08Â°6 5 06 06 0 0 52Sxtrijai.@ Em J CE (0 E Ul A m q. J Â©25 h: 8EEc m.-' 92< W,= .2%'iq#Mid &15*0Q-ME.~0 w r m m O 2'ct Z AEr/ a) 0 -Â¤ 1 It- u)CO.IC>gCn i 2 2 5 & 2 0 g i E E Â·@ 9 1 i :8 ~ â‚¬ ~ g . E 2 3 S E s Â·ce. ~ 1 9 W Â®E C C>~ O= 83 '05 C# cl 00 S OC > O CO O U)0 0 -,6 LU 05 0 6 S m i- (D z e > O-, M -3 0 0 0517 80517 LL908 DISM Z[908 Z 1.908 'Mled Sms UBMZ 'o eJ Dr., 322 Sp ng Bernadette H. Salter gnature Circle ail Ridge, Ltd. eful Valley Roa olorad ub Lane W. Colorado Drive Owner 11 V~ Aartsen CiIN~C~an venso een Cou Kathleen Teresa Tritico a bara L. Vi lett E PLO cia Sopuoo Bu!960011!deM DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE STATISTICS: Utilities: Water Town of Estes Park Electric Town of Estes Park ~A/apT-rT rAnqâ‚¬TNG rnAinnMTAITI IMq re.... flae r...1 , 7- from Code shall new t Cap '.12 24, 9S 1trol ; RESERVED ONE JRVEYINQ INC -- -. . w,olu-w .1 MDI Arrr,61"w Mi _MIL_ .VW .V. 21".1 :Â·ric.c.1 .... 01. ....~...4, 1 EW -703)-gis-2408 4U 120 SCALE 1 " U= 40' North 00'48'00" West. C~EDBY~ S~E ASSH~N2007 487.002 1 11 CUENT: ESTIS PARC CO. 80617 NÂ¥$>' FAX (970) 688-2489 - SUIT: 200 LEXINGTON LANE, LLC - -- e . A .A A.. . .. . . â€ž:12%,1. .. .. -- ' 0 0. .A. . 0 ID. 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 ... .A . . .. - '. 1 . 0 ..... ..... i . 0 .: A D 1 ..fil. I : . 0 . (.1 0 9.2.it&, . , ... , . ..0 00 09.!1 - . ... 0 - 4 . . . - ... , 0.- I. .. 1 - 1 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 : ,. I ./ . -2.,2 - 1 1 - .:.. . ..0 D .. 00*~42.4,-r I , 0. : 1 - .. 2 1 - 1 - - 0 . 0 1 .. , . . :D â€¢A * ID .. . . .. . 0 4, le, , .A 6 - . :1 . .. 0....1 1 . 0. ... C . â€¢ . 1 =Al D . .. . 0. ... 0- 1 2- 1 .. i .. M....0 0 0 .. .-. 3 '' . f.. . .. . f.. .. . I ... . . I . - -. 0 1 0. 1 n 1 0 .. ...... .... ... ....... 7.-, 1.4.26 1 D 1 1 - 1 . I .. .. 1. 0 . 1. F ... D 0 .0 - I :.:. I . . .. .. D . 1- .. I. , .-0.ID - ID -0.- I : . I =- D. . I. I... Dll - ... 1. 0 -0-0 -- ... I D , .. -a . . .. 0 0 - D, 0 0 .. 0 0 - I . A ... .. - . ..... . D. .. ... D - G ... . 00 .1 0 0 0 .. . - .. .el , I . 0 0 . . 0 O D - D- : ... .. .. . A k . k~ A / â€¢ ILA 0 - ID . ... , .AP'#i .. 4 4~ ... . I. I . .2 - 4 - 1 I. I - . I . 1 . -- 1 e.. - --31 <1*/1 4.. .4 m./.9.' - . -- ./. 1..... * I r-\ :a./.- 8â‚¬65 ./8.... *- 4/0 - -9.. AF-4 W 40 /41. A- -- ... . ..2.. ... .- . -- ... . & 4. --. , 1/ ... .k .-r ... / 4 3'.1 - .4,1. .. ...1 . . ......--- ........... ./ill, eklitfill . <. i ./<$) \ *7,9,<*A...........0 10"k . I. 1... 4Â¥ . .... I. 0 .... . 0 . . . ... .. . . .-I . I .. . .2-..... -*. . . .. . D $= --Â»21 V .. 0 * 00/00*40.000/ 4-*A *2A Â·'Â· . ............ .... . . 9.-I = .. .... D . 2 â€¢ â€¢ ... 0 .... . .. 2 .. -I . 2-=.. . . . . . ... - . I - 4/: 10'/ I . I . . .. . .. . .4 .... .L I. ... - I 4. --2 . I . .... . I. .... 0 0 0-) (44" ..... I 0 4/2~Sah/4/ki~r ..A - C / .... ... ...9 . 1 . I ... E .- e ...9.-.- I. I ..... -...... 00 1 ,0 , 4 ... ... .. 4. ..Mt . A A --- . I ... ... . -. ... .. kg - -=WIT ..... Â¥ 1 Â¥ 4% 0 00 2 2:. I 0. 0-- 0 . I. .. - -. -1:.â€¢ . 0. 0, . I# - - 0 - A I .0 0 00 m L -- . ... 0 :. /:1 1.."/1 .1 . C 0/044 - -......... . DEVELOPMENT PLAN -- 1 PROPOSED RI HT TURN DECELERATION LANE I WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS__ill_ ~ (310 FT) LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION 1 4 STATE HIGHWAY No. 7 TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK 429 100' 41ACCESSIBLE RAMP W/ 4,3 2.' rt ?44 SIGH DISTANCE = 480 FT - DETECABLE WARNING OYP.) SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., ~ ~ HIGHWAY '0\ - R.O.W. = EXISnNG 15Â» COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO S A- --. FOUND 3-1/2Â» S- i -- \ ELECTRIC \ S-- -------- 12-- s -- ALUM. R.O.W. CAP , - - - DATED 08 1 - s - - .AI_RECEPTION No. CALC 7ED _~ ---71- -Â»5289985 - -/ -0 - -- -- -0 - - -- - PROPERTY C NER T / --- 0 ------- %1 G- - D ../ / r' , 7680 --. ------ ------ G I.IL / I ---- 9. I / 6 - M / -6/ 9 . 0 / 4 - 4 / -. I....li - 676Â· - 25' . 4/ PRopo /Z_ SETBACK Ep //// 11 _E L 7678 / 10' ELECTRIC ~ ~ _ *.~a - -EASEMENT . ./1 9 4 1 7678 / %-- Â·Â·- -- - u - I ... 4 4%'O 4 2 5 1616- ~~ . 2/ , 1 / 5. w / 4- / 1 682.45 / â‚¬. CDOT 40 E EAS MENT 6 . 4/ j - V . -21 DATED W 01/19 7 AT ~ ~ ~ ~OSED - -3 - 1% / P POSED ~ O' SANITARY , J PROPOSED O /< UNIT.5 RECtP ION No 's ? ( DETENTION-POND / ' ENER EASEMENT 10' SAN/7-ARY - \ ~ ~ \ 4 VOLUM&212-8--AE FT. / SEWER EASEME 11613 sf 9707959 9707 598, u ~ , I 97079599 9707 600, 11 -EFR-RELEASE oF 1.â‚¬'Â¢FS / \ \ 4AA) / 0 ,/ FE=7701.25 / // / 999 L 1 1 970796* 970 602 , 1 fl / 7676- , 0 FF$691\25 UNIT Al O U.1 / ..1 ,* 11 UNIT 9 Pr=7692.4.f z ' / 1 , / 7678 ff.1 -~'2,234.5 sf 7 1 ' \ , 1 1 ' lili FF==276245 , r 1 - 't 8.5 UNIT A4 / l A / 0 FF. 1/ S % 2,234,5\ sf , V +- 1.75 NTR 1 0\ f 2,234.5 sf GARAGE -- 1 0 -46~ . 1 *TRY _ *- 1 IL LIFE s 3 Le-~41 t ~ -- ----- UNIT FF=7698~33 ------ FF=7691.15- FF=7701.15 /7~:56 0 810 8 -- ... 79 1,613 s FE=1488.33- - J â€ž2 ~ / --- PROPOSED 15Â» 44 I . / IM- : too 0 / v FF- FF=7608.58 - A~ CULVERT ~ 7691.6 1 9 0 F ISI EWALK / ~ U T A3 F'~768*~58 GAFTAGE ~ ~GARAGE ~ - . T. / 4 Z 1 // \ 4 -0- r 4 12Â» it. / U All T u 10 Al~ACHED CU B 1 ,234.5 7687.8 , / 3 \ & GUTTER ~160 FF=769.79 \ - ' 0 - 3345 sf / ~ 68 FF=7688. ~ 1 154%,SE 7688~0 1478 7687.14 4 CURB CUT - 1688.73 4 4 - 0~ 5=5679#81 / 05 0, / 0 1 -- / / / 0.4 - - / ..1 7688.2 . \4 / 0 - 224 20' 91'-6~ \ /// -~ ~RSHT OF W)~-11 W ~ 1 0/ 581.70 / : 30' 7682 I //7 \0 -/ / // % 7691~ 4 % / 7687 -/ 40 / i / , / / 1 / / 0 / 4 / /40 / 7684 ///// / 7 87.79 , , , / / / 4 / 87. 3 / /3 11' RAGE/J// Â¥4. ~ CA â€¢ // 1/ , IM / / ENTRY 686.54 0* -Â¥666 4 19' 759 %- ~NIT Al 2 /0 / LK / / 2,&34.5 sf / % I ' \ 0 / 1 -4 PROPOSED 15" - PROPOSED UNIT *8 11 ,-6 2Â· / - ~ T H ; - *.t. J -00*=77~6.17 1696 10' ELECTRIC / / / ,'ADS CULVERT 2,234.5~ sf - = 1<38 1 , - , - EASEMENT 1* * 141:i - / FF=16 6.11 / FOUND f 11 t B *1 - , / FF=110436 / / / / 1 1 , / / PIPE -1\ hA ,/ UNIT A20 % 420- 16* ''= UNIT A5 , FF=7694.34 ' 49% I- /./ 1 E 1 1 -/ 2,234. f sf 76~00 / 2,2305 sf 21'.. 96 / / 1 / GARAG~ ~ * / 165 0 r , . FF= 7700.~2 - / ' PROpos '0 OT* 4, / r / / 0 .9/ \ 1/ FF=76984 ~*Asc FF=7690.4~ 690 UNIT\87 -, \ \\ 1// / FF=7688.50 , , , 7689.92 f , 2,234.5,9 - el- - + -3:05, f O% GARAGE SHAD'y\ FF=7705.35 32/ 0% 52. .0 / / VEÂ»7595.55 9 1 1 ' ..33~'*0" ./ 769 . 9 // LANE \ R POS " ~7689.07 lego * -- / 4 '.0. . A / // ----- 0. / / %4 \0 1| T ,, \ GARAGE 09 % r UNIT A6 t / 27!A <11 _.-0.0/ 1 UNG 01 , PROPOSE >s> US#etoi /147 H < .2Â· ~ 7692.11 2,234.5 sf -- - Â£~Ci- ~ ~ R ~4 ~r- PROPOSED \ / 1. / / 2 W @ 1 ADDITIONAL 7.5' \ ' 2,234.5 s f T / FF=7702.61 1 // MÂ¥ FF=7692.61 ft /// -// T 8351 1--1-1}1\\ ~ RIGHT OF WAY _ _~t -' 7700 / J *-.1 / -02 -- 1 / FF=7699.57 0 - 769t / / 7699.41 , F -- 0% - Ar Ell ' 1- -~ 35' FT i l. / / -- , , FF=7689.57 le t~ -3- 1 / t- - - I / 9 1 % kieli M . . / 1. D / k Â· ETBACK 1 e' r 1 ./ i ENTRY ~ 0213 / a / 11 / 4,0 7699.7 9/ / -Iblue'lu / UNI73416 PROPOS , ' r PROPOSED ~ RIGHT oF / A / i / , I. PROPOS ' â€ž LIGHT POL 1 / / -0 UICD 1 H<ZL \ 2OJW . Â·/ '22.. t. ADS ' /01 2,234.5 sf - il - .-' -zf.-bgf#~41 1/1m42~~, --~~ - -1 .*- 0 , , 700.5 , . FE=7715.50 / - /1 7698 4 ~ 8.50 1 / 12' ~ FF=770g.50 ,/ t / V . '111 11 111*+1 #4[I [â€ž5~/D~AL,=I - - -- // 2 / 1102 ~b. ~ ~~~~,4: .a~L 1 21 =--=c ~ ~ -~I / . I' W -- 1 I \ 9. . , 21'-6" ~ / ~ 1 1 6.3.-6 7 338.22 , 7705.00 A ~ ~ los 1 1 - * ~0 2 GOI F CQUREELECAL> 1% 05*19 10' SETBACK ' 77~4.24 SCALE 1" = 20' It / W / 4/// , 20 0 20 40 60 24' .,- _ , u 1104 ,33.- . r 4/ / PROPOSED 9 ,Â· f&94.75 / 1 0) 7696.99 / /- / 1.55 1 1 / 1 7692.6 4 - -- / 3 d....0000- 0+* , L.-- , -,â€¢-'' / 1 # / / ./ - ' ~/- FOUND REBAR - /. . -/ M I I ; 1 CONCRETE , /. - P / / // .ril / PAN ; \ 1 / 1.- / 4 Â¥23 - -- - sonya'oal am.el ft&=-- ~ - =31-Z L<n-37 - - iÂ»Â«9 99 88' '27 61- fb - ---9 00'48' -2-886.51 (PFÂ» / I ' / r-X 1 CALCULATED ---IL -Fo.~0,N iw*-*,-------------333+------4- . - VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION F S --*---- Ill-Il PROPERTY +*84,; R30' s - , - s LOT 28 ~ CAROLL G, DERMODY 4 CORNER VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION Ils TLL. , / ZONED E (ESTATE) 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING dc SURVEYING, INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED S-- L_NE-CORNER -6GT-1,- (29 --- /1 -// ~| 110& DERREL L./BEVERLY M. MITCHELL r ~ VILLAGE ACRES SUB -- ----- / r------------------------ --- -- - ZONED E (ESTATO DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: CUT DowA CURB AT _---- --- -- ------ \ LOT 2A WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS --- 1 08/22/07 SEPARATE UNITS Al -AZ JUR -/-/i _ 10/01/07 PER PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT MST FOOND PEBAR EXIST]NG-[)mVEWAr - _- -lo \ VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION --- LOT 1 - \ ~ HOWARD L. JONES MODIFY EXISTING SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION CORNE#sTONE ~ 11/ 4LEG'/BLE CAP - 4322--1 -- \ VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION -/- \ % ZONED E (ESTATE) 12" CULVERT || S.EET TITLE: DARCY A. SPOONER - \ \ i NORTH SIDE // 0 \ \ ~ =m zoN=-2- fE@TATO \ 1 JOB NO. SHFF.T SHEET SITEPLAN DKENmiING & Â«C. 1 SURVEYIN[1 INC . 60' ~4 RIGHT OF WAY . DESIGNED BY WST APPROVED BY KMP 1892 BIG THOMPSON PA,$09-MFN-:.00 \ DRAWN BY -BRL.. DATE JULY 25. 2007 487.002 2 11 CLIENT: LEXINGTON LANE, LLC ESTES PARE Co. 80517 ~Â¥:P' FAX (970) 680-2489 - \ I 1 1 1 1 --0-/- - ~ | CHECKED BY MST SCALE AS SHOWN 1 1 1 NNELS ZONED E~AT ) SAGER A RES SUBDI ZONED SIGHT DISTANCE = 180 FT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Cil 1 ~WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS ~4 99 4 LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION 000 100' TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK 7-U 0-94 Â» HIGHWAY SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., . i--I- -il--0 R.O. W. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO - 1 1,-Â· i --W STATE HIGHWA 1 Â· . ~i No. 7 Ii. ' : , ' SIGH. DISTA CE = 340* FT - - SIGH1~DISTA CE = 350* FT : , FOUND 1 Â» BENT PIPE & . RELOCATE EXISTING \ PROPOSED TfPE 'R -- LIGHT POLE \ INLET BOTH SIDES - - 1-1/4. ALUM. CAP PLS * -+ - U -- I (CAP BEARS S86*09'49"E, #6499, BOTH DISTURBED -- -- - \ I ALUM. R.O.W. CAP r-----___ --- OM ------t- ---- *-G ------ ------- ---- -- 1 _------ -SOâ€¢P23'53~W -888.-~~ --- - R36.00 AntruuAPK ELEV-7692.70 4 - -1 A--- - ' - i CALCULAIED CORNER) - -SEIBACK - 1 -Sam14_091.9 p --G -U 1 - / A- - - - - - G- L - -- -- --li St r I 7Â»>EÂ« 4 - 'ale --=I--ULL-=--8. -% .-/ --- li - - - < - -- N- --- 769 -- --- i .... -- ------- i - - L -_.__ ~'~E -4=:1_._~ â‚¬o ~7~~7~--- -------------/ ill--- 0 6.00 1 30" - - - --- \ G- P - l-- -- 9 I - --- ... -G -- . I - /---1 0 - f -'a =. 9 ---- A # t t~ G 1 - - \\// 4"P . 9' 21 9 - . /4.9 O"PP ------- / / . I \\ =1 17.44 Â·1-- ~' _ ~ _PROPOSED SIGN LOCAnOA .PAN /// \ /1 4 \- ----im-Ey-- . --. - V 25' ) 10 Â·Â·,11 1- ~ ~ --- =1- SETBACK j 4 A.#94 Ngh"P,c., 1 1 -- , \ 11 0/\----- I 2 P--- 1--4- - - â‚¬Zth UNIT Al 4 --- - 1 7-'5819'k -r- Â· Â·\ M -- . \ \- \\\ 1 / -- --_le?01.- MON-OF ' -- - 2,234.5 sf ~ v 1% 11901% ' . - . - *-9/- - F 1,1-7 1 ... -- \ ~1-pp I 1 -=IPP-- GARAGE ~ 285.00 0 0 i -7 1 / k 1 CX, 1 \- - - .. A -2 ..1/.16Â»ar-*- \ / FF=77033.81.-6- 1 \ 4 9.5' 0"PA \ 20'ep'' â€¢p , / Cl f FF= 7693.#01/ UNIT Al 5 ,=34. -- .,1- 2. -- S ./ \ 1 INA;.4. X. \ - -- -4 . UFE N 0% ,2434.5 sf _---- -'c Â· 41 - /16 . \2 / R12.00 ~ ~ ~2 1. - 1 /- = _ -9 =7705.44 ./ 9, --"-- - I \ \ - Ill- h 1 1 0 RID - ~ ~ / - - FF= 7695.44 -- --k ~ GARAGE Â¢YP 9' - -- Ii-- \ -- . 1 -4 . ' . 4/9.0 \ 1, I 1 Sk 1 / I N T 7698.-18, ~ 12"PP r 8 -- - 9 kEE 0. - 10â€žPP 30Â»P . 1 / ---- 9 \ 1 -- h / r -- 110\\. NÂ¢4 -- / V \ -- GARAGE 21 rl ,1 . /, - - . 14,/ / \#**\ N 1 SUE WAi /1 K - \ ' 309 25 , 46 Lr / -- K / j - AX, 1 , k j E 0 8 . opp -1 12' / . 4 / 1 / / --1 / ~\ /?23' 1100 --- / 8'PA *410' SETBACK . 7 / .%70(74 .... 4 -- R12. . 7 \ / 2,234.5 sf / \ | 15" ke>K 17- J - 1 1 "PPI 4 - 99=7105.5-7 ' - r i I 0- %- ' i FF=7695.57 -,/ T 1,4 â€¢0 = , tpll 2.00 //0 / 11. r '' - / i --- / 1 - -n / I / / N - - -t . : C 351- - *\ / - 9 3" 5" 1 Â»PP r 4 \ / ~*; 24"P 0 . / 4"PO . vrt:41\ \ _ I -i- - 7 - -- , \ \ - - - w TOW 52. 11 - _ 8 PP 1 - 1 . ..7 -\ ' 0 - . P - \ I / 4 . ' Co T ~~Lfrc\r"Vh 44 . 1696 ~ 0Â£~ ' LIMITS OF F / / GO / % 11/ pul U/9/1 4 9 . 4 .9 " # S 1,20922 \~ i~26.18 P 1 1 \ - 15~P 2.Pp g. \ I ./ I - 4// - ,> / -- TOW=7705.50 1 28'*P f - . 00 // 1 \< .. / IP \\ .4 4 ./4 03 N th, 0 5' --. 60 2ND FF=7718.00 - - - PROPOS 2 2 \ 1 / 99/ P 9%. f / 1ST FF=7708.00 4,754â€žA \ ' ~~~ --- 770 GARAGE FF=7696.00 9 \- 20Â»ZON 14 I *'~-L~v i \ V . â€¢.11Â·* / 1 *# /1 ~8 w \. L Ir V -1------ ------- r#:-Ed,5('Â· Â·-:il- / , I -- - 704 -- -- .4Â·t >.:4'4:,Â·' 36"PP --TO- Â· ,- -- - .P . \ - -14.ficÂ¢,%11~,;34 DOS 1 " - Â£)(Ir /// N\ , / '.:w,:~Zo-I- .: 5.:pA.1 00 /EXISTING~ w 40 Â«*Â«04- 1 Â·.1 / # 2 - O/// / __ --------- TRY ---__ --- -/ 10/ 10 0 +Ok- 1 / SHED / PROPOSED / - / x Â£ 438 sf | \ 36"PP ---- --- , 3,3 * 091 3 -- i / .--MULTI-FAMILY - il- - - / --- -/ . , 7 ,/4 63<4 - - '~Â· l. t.Â·Â·Â· u.2 .. R b.:7 /32-*$ ' f RESIDENCE , / 20 Â· - 40- -- 1 N. 49.-- ...tc...:.1~.A :L:5/ e,- - - 1 . - - k \-$ / 0 20 40 60 <--// 30,000 sf ~-~56-1PPP O / 6 SCALE 1" = 20' , - / i-Â«G===443*Â¥p ! 26 7708 / / / 7710 / / / TO - 9.50 EXISTING , f Y* 91Â«1 PA . / "1// / f CABIN L_-UX.- /24-20Â»PP\329< 1/ LA . 1 /->r 1 'Al 6 - PATIO , U /<," \ 1491 sf / 1 / 5 sf \ ~ FF=7708.00 c 1 / 3,50 0~-- TOW=7712.50 * / ~ p 50 / 7710 0 9347--4 *p Â·, 4 ' /--FJOW=7712.50 1/JO "PP 1-1 / 9 A LP>.... ~ ' -- - 14 Â«l30"PRAÂ« 1 1 U\ -<7- / dz E / / /'WE 1 - --------- \ 1/ -A ~ --los - - - - --1---4(~267*,2 \. V \ \ / 3199/// 1 j /// 10' SETBACK CULFIX&R .. -=-1--i- / 04 ,.. FÂ»epp -\ I -- - 29'48'00"E 879.68' (CL - ------- - - - #w 92-;- __ -*=- d,-=â€žp*773 ~1 ~~*WHP1-- dHO -- ----- /- FOUND REBAR _ ---- S 00'78' E 888.5'(P) BASIS OF BEARING ------b-~~---- / FOUND CENTER N 1/16 FOUND #4 REBAR / LOT 4 CORNER OF SECTION 31, T5N, / YELLOW PLASTIC / V SOO*48'007 1310.05' j VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION R72W BEING A 1 -1/4" ALUM. CAP #9485 MICHEAL R. MANGELSEN/SUSAN K. O'CONNOR CAP PLS #6499 LOT 1 A -S -S ~ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE' ~ ZONED E (ESTATE) VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION \ U CAROLE B./BARRY K. STEL PINE KNOLLS SUBDIVISION ~ CAROLL G. DERMODY ZONED E (ESTATE) 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING. INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RES#VED ZONES E (ESTATE) REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: 10/01/07 PER PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT MST WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION CORNE#STONE SHEET TITLE: SOUTH SIDE SITEPLAN ENCâ„¢EjUNG & <~~ SURVE!11!Â«1 INC DESIGNED BY IST APPROVED BY KMP JOB NO. SHEET SHEET 1891 BIG TBO~SON (970) 588-2468 SUITE 200 DRAWN BY -EL... DATE JULY 25. 2007 3 11 CUENT: 487.002 LEXINGTON LANE, LLC ESIES PARK, co. 80617~ FAx (070) 688-2480 60 CHECKED BY kIST SCALE AS SHOWN VHJNVIAI ->i H Y DIVEI J OlygolÂ·03NOZ u / N8559*25 NEIVd S3153 30 %~T-lf _â‚¬ff AV ONISAOH NOISMICORS DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO -..Vd-.---.-Pp*.-.'/I.*<Il--.*-I--).'---I-*..-l-M#--.I-..-;..*q-'-'#V-**/-* bm'..-I- EXISTING 15Â» PROPOSED /- SEWER , / -MANHOLE - C - - 4 '64 1 L. r-7 -- 11- - - 5 ----2 - S --1- 0 --- -- RELOCATE NG PROPOSED 1YPE 'R -- LE INLET BOTH SIDES '' I ' .. / / 580 - SED _ --r- I - - .. ----- ---EXI TING LU , ---- - . / . . . 1 L-z--' ----------- ----- -- ~ 'J -11- N ./1 .. -4 Er-7-54 -FAZ-- -7~JUNCTION BOX - _ - G l\//-- -*Ill ---4- 1 / M / I -- U -- . - .Â»7->Â·r: PROPOSED ~310.-".---4. 4 ----- --- PROPOSED 10' --- - G - - ~ ,SAN/TARY SEWER ~ ' 1 -Se.'/El.nf 2211'22 . - -F-- fl -. . b.i:-I Â· 0 *' -- - I 3- ~ PROPOSED ------- DETENTION- POND ,- ' ~ < \ 3724 EASEMENT/. ~~02223 . , , . .... - 1 1 \ \/ ~ r----'~Tn G - , EASE*gy ~ - TARY' S ER * -- T ---4*L POLUMEâ€¢O.18 AC. R. 7 ;413 s Nx \ .. SEWER ~ -AR~pb~ED , BRI .1 - 2-<m-RELEASE OF 1.6 CFS ~ -- PROPOSED 10'- i --23* / / 7â€¢RU / / 1 0 / ELECTRIC PROPOSED DEC/CAT -- -- 4-- St â‚¬XS / ROPOSED '68KVA -- '\ UNIT Alo MANHOLE ,-131SEWER MANHOLE /\\ 4- 1 ./ UNIT Al 4 -- --< ' TRANSFORMER =2 - \ 1 2,234.5 sf , \ '31*~ sf -- EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY Â· I - I . . # * 4 L -* UNIT 9 / clu- A15 IF TH: '51; j _- _- r \ ~ -_ p -2-1 gÂ»A 1 * 0 / 1 - / / / /li - / / UNIT A4 . 3 i 1- / 0 - 13UM Nfl- 12,234.5 sf ---\1 1 2,234.5~sf < 2 1 1 / 04--k + /- )11 - - /84Â£ 1211 \ 1,613 z--P?OPOSED 15' - / | 1 - , / 0 \ 1 ApS CULVERT 4111 11 1 U A3 / 9/ \.1/-- UNIT A 0 - --.-I- . f \\ \ -di , 34.5 , /6/ I / .- \4- -><- ./ 0 / -- N N - / 0 2,23 . sf / . //7 -/ 1 - - 1 1 / / / / 0 / . 4 , h- \: 111 - 1.- / / i / - 1 1 \ - 1 - -- 1 - - / I // h - -PROPO#58/ 0 \ ,UNITC# 6 1 / / r--- // / / SEWER // 8 4 E ATED \\ 1 MANHOLE /0 / / , 2,234.5 sf 7700 7 1100 / / \ I I / - / I .R' \ I - / 2 , -/ I / f / 1 - / 22 / / . / / / / / N - W 1 UNIT AB W ~ / 1 / . / / i :'/ i Il- 1 , /- 5489.--\ \/\ , 2234 11 A / / M - A. 11 / 4 1 - . -- \/ , tier wl. â€ž , i i / I - / -w :, / 1 VJ 7 14 \ '\ 1600 < /:: -- - 2<.'-Â·/ , 2 -~-'El .,4, 0. PRe~SED 15' PhOPOSED< \ UNIT Al 2/ / /ADS CULVERT / 4 ~5 10' ELECTRIC = 0/ i 1 Â»fL,29 7/AL 1- 1 I / /UNIT 42/ / ,'UNIT A5 ' ' . 191 \ EASEMENT 2,234.6' sf , .. r.f...9 9, . 9..5 1 / / / , -- 1 / / // , ------------ 0 :\SA. 4 1 1 W 7 ,/%2\ 1 . I ~ '~ ., ' 2.234.5~fg 238 sf ./ k., / , r#*Â·-Â»=4#SHI Â·\ '"' /\ \ 2 . 0 \ \ .r.i'.4,0 . 9'~ 41--7 .....i jO & I . // - 'Â·745 1 4 11%~ 'as>t:dly# / \ f_>i / / / \/ K- . I.- // :... -1 4......,1/ 2.-L ' -r / 1 }\ 21/ 1 I / - / D / ----- / /UNIT A7 / -- 311 , / -- /. / 9 4 - -- / 4 ~ - 2,234.5 sf - 9.'Â·i' "/11:54 - // /- - - ' -rf:7-, .:1*,6:2.. : - . s >O' -1 % 4 8-1- r - r--/ -- t-- 1 -- ADS // / /WK / X UNIT A6 ' / J h- // . ./UNG Kf 22*5 sf - --- , PROPOSED 50KVA ------ - / - AV - - 14 ,â€¢ 'AA. 'iÂ·Â·,2. , 2,234.5 sf . / I ---, / 3. / /// 1 / --- , , TRANSFORMER, VULTI-FAMILY -- - ~2 -- 1 / -- ~ FROPG~f / / / .. PROPOSED,/ ~ RESIDENCE / / -I -/ 4 - - / , / h A- f 1 NA> 0 2". & 0\ 1 1 + PROP 1 ~~/~'~00~ ~ ~ ~ 1000$4,, ~ 30,000 sf - / * . /p-pu.x,5-29;4 0 1 i , t \ i I 7710 S Gl %11 / / / - TRAN5FORMER / EXISTING / \ -NN~â„¢*9 - / UNIT,*16 - ~ CABIN ,P\~ 3** ll'Â°%*\. . \ 1 PROPOSED AN 1 - I / ' - - 0// 1491 sf i X-3~Â»3 I -13 I 0 8 1, .. '4\ 4 I PROPOSED T ' ROPOSED 2,2315 sf -- - WS - / '9/15142.33. 74 /- '#.P~ / 1 , cum ,-- - '-*____ /- -\. , ~ , '. / / - , 4*A-:X'A/ / 1 i k. \ 11. -/ 1 / , -I - '' 1 , i / / \/ / 1 \1 / 11-6 ill - 0' /' 1 - . )-9 1/ / /1 / .... / ----/ N L. 1 16*9"7 \ 1 1 1 , .. -r / / .1 - Marp / / -7<-2.-1 2- 4 N # 1 | 41 ---r -1 - P - , - <Â·73 /79 -- '- :1 4Â«t*e _31t~~_ 43~ -~ - Ls 9. 1 rM,rr- LU ~ 1 RIGHT OF WAY ZONED E (ESTATE) PINE KNOLLS - Â»Ly Ii-- dg-- - / LOT 4 VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION MICHEAL R. MANGELSEN/SUSAN K. O'CONNOR LOT 1 ./- / LOT 2B \ VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION CAROLE B./EDU VILLAGE ACRES SUBDMSJON CAROLL G. DERMODY ZONED E DERREL L/BEVERLY M. MITCHELL ZONED E (ESTATE) S --- --- ZONED E (ESTATE) -- ...AC LOT 24 VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION LOT 1 j # HOWARD L JONES MODIFY 0/SDNG - VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION- -- 1 ) ~ ZONED E (ESTATE) 12" CULVENT NOTES: 30 0 30 60 90 SCALE 1" = 30' 1) BRANCH LINES OFF THE PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN ARE ELECTRICAL NOTES: ELECTRICAL METERING PLAN: PRIVATE SERVICES, FUTURE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE REQUIRED ON THESE SERVICES IS THE SOLE Multi,family unit to have 25 individual meters. Each RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDING OWNER(S). 1 - ALL FEEDERS SHOWN ARE TO BE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC. meter to be labled with meter number and address. Meters are to be set in numeric order. 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: 05/22/07 SEPARATE UNITS Al -*2 JLR WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: 10/01/07 PER PREUMINARY STAFF REPORT MST BASIS OF BEARING: SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION CORNE#sTONE HEATH WEHRMAN The basis of bearing for this survey is the West Line of BELFRAY ENGINEERING the Northwest 1/4, of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31, SHEET TITLE: 2811 WEST 9TH AVENUE Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., From DENVER, CO. 80204 the Center North 1/16 (#5 Rebor w/ 1-1/2 Alumunum â€¢ P: 303-892-5980 EXT 102 UTILITY PLAN ENOOm=ING & 20(1 1 SURVEYIPq.DIC Cap) to the North 1/4 Corner with a plotted bearing of DESIGNED BY WST APPROVED BY KMP JOB NO. SHIFT qNFET 1692 BIG THOMPSON F.7251--likf~0-2,00 SUIT! 200 F: 303-892-5979 DRAWN BY -2&.. DATE JULY 25, 2007 487.002 LEXINGTON LANE, LLC urn PARK. CO. 8051,~ Nx (070) 688-2469 North 00'48'00Â» West. CHECKED BY _EL_ SCALE AS 3310101 411 CUENT: BARTON L./SHARON A DANNELS 8Â» RAW WATER IRRIGATION MAIN TO GOLF COURSE Z 101 :1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1 SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 9-4- - -- E - - E I W -E- Â«X- ---E - Na. i -E .-I -E - 1 - - E ~91#~r -------------1.------------7.===--==.--t=W- --I 1 0--*E li - --E -4 -- E- ESTIMATED 50KVA 120/240V/10 UNIT B 1,613 sf < T ONE STACK 7Â»(SH ONE STACK OF 3 METERS UNIT A 10 < OF 3 METERS 2.234.5 sf UNIT A14 2234.5 sf UNIT 9 UNIT A4 IT A15 2.234.5 sf 2.234.5 sf 34.5 st UNIT 1.613 s UNIT A3 METER 2,234.5 UNIT All METER 2,234.5 sf METER METER 0 1 LU I UNIT A 13 17 1 2.234.5 sf METER NDA AL 1 1 \\ UNIT P 2.234. sf UNIT Al ' METER UNIT UNIT A5 2.234.5 \\ 2.234. sf .4 METER \\ OKVA w METER /240V/10 METER iL.-- J TIMATED 1OOKVA 120/208V/30 EL SECONDARY METER UNK A7 PEDESTAL 2.234.5 sf ~ r-- 1 1 TTP IT AS - METER 2 .5 sf 1 0 4438* MULTI-FAMILY 0\ // p XCEL SECONDARY RESIDENCE UNIT Al PEDESTAL 30,000 sf .234.5 s li.1 XCEL SECON :ARY En I h MUTI-FAMILY / 4- PEDESTAL T 2 METER STACK , 0- , i UNIT A16 PAnO 1 1401 i /Anc~i~~W-3 0 0 0 2,234.5 d 1 MEJER -Oh <\ / 1 ' -*\\ 4 / \ #0,/ 1/ V i.1 L ---- -*.< -- W j ... - - dâ‚¬-3- -- -- -- f 1 / 30 0 30 60 90 ELECTRICAL NOTES: ELECTRICAL METERING PLAN: SCALE 1" = 30' 1- REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR THE PRIMARY POWER ROUTING. Multi-family unit to have 25 individual meters. Each 2- ALL FEEDERS SHOWN ARE TO BE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC. meter to be labled with meter number and address. 3- ALL PANELS ARE 125 AMP/1 PHASE. Meters are to be set in numeric order. 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 4- LOADS ASSUME AIR CONDmONING. GAS HEAT, AND NORMAL APPLIANCES.. Single. Duplex and Triplex_units to each have individual - 08/22/07 SkIE UN\IS -2 U WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: meters located on individual unit exterior walls. BASIS OF BEARING: SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION /Â§932*712. The basis of bearing for this survey is the West Line of t.43) I %*12 the Northwest 1/4, of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31, 31-ICET TITLE: Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th P.M., From 1 9. SEP 25 Â«9~ %43 22795 * the Center North 1/16 (#5 Rebor w/ 1-1/2" Alumunum â€¢ - SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN Cap) to the North 1/4 Corner with o plotted bearing of DESIGNED BY IST APPROVED BY KMP JOB NO. SH ET SHEET tae*- North 0048'00" West. DRAWN BY _RQ~ DATE JULY 25. 2007 487.002 4Bll CUENT: LEXINGTON LANE, LLC ' 711:~n,9 CHECKED SY WST SCALE AS SHOWN 7 / DEVELOPMENT PLAN -....1 2& -i.... WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION 20 0 20 40 60 TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., SCALE 1" = 20' COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 25'-0" 1 24'-0" 21'-0" ASPHALT 50-0. 414" r 11/2. 18Â» - - 18" - 1 18" SIDEWALK 1~1--CURB &~ GUTTER -' ~ ~ 1 Inal 1 1 FACE OF CURB' ~ / ~N. 6" THICK OR U\\\ 9 1 -:.....9 1~::A/D 1 3Â» ASHPALT E THICKNESS lil= 1 ... .. 6~ - 0) 1 ~ PER PAVEMENT DESIGN VARIES VARIES 1 6, : ,... f k 'G'uÂ¥Tkk N>* gx'~9 1 Â·Â·.Â·Â·.Â·â€¢'41â€¢.22Â·Â·,r.'Â·; '......;1~â€ž.I,A,A [ ~2 1 ,(TYPE 2) *~> _ Â« 4 ././ 2 ... . 4" AGGREGATE 3 ' - 1 ffi: 10,. ,---,â‚¬~c>t.~rlr:-~rt...2.-f t T I. 2'-0' CONCRETE BASE COURSE 2'-0" CONCRETE _~_~Ba gR' / / h >27* \ CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER 1 , ~ 4- PAN UNE GRADE ~ CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 ~Â·~ TO BE BUILT WHEN TO BE BUILT WHEN - (SECTION l IB) GUTTER (TYPE 2) GUTTER (TYPE 2) ROAD PROFILE TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 7'-6" IS NOT REQUIRED IS REQUIRED (6" BARRIER - 18" GUTTER) CROWN SLOPE TABLE NTS MATCH CURB - 6'-OÂ» M47CH CURB ~ THIS AREA SHALL BE POURED MONOUTHICALLY WITH CURB AND GUTTER AND PAID FOR AS 'CONCRETE PAVEMENT.0 g ELEVATIONS ELEVAUONS 7 + FLOW UNE LOCATION WILL BE ESTABUSHED BY W/2 SHOWN ON PLANS. ROAD PROFILE CROWN SLOPE 1 ~" LEGEND i 41/2.1 r 11/2. 18. <5% 2% 44.4 /34 FOR RADII CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE 5%-8% 3% GUTTERS AT INTERSECTION ~~ EF-7\- ~7 t:.1 ... e ?/ 0. A = 1/8" TO 1/4" \ 6. >8% 4% ~ INV MATCH C'. B = 10 . ..'. Â·1.4-r .0-73. 9 4 4 1 /D 1 0 / L FLOWINE ELEVATIONS C = 114Â» D = 11/2" TO 20 TYPICAL CONCRETE PAN DETAIL. NOT TO SCALE 1. .It, .. -1- CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 (SECTION IB) (6" BARRIER - 18" GUTTER) ELECTRIC 22 ~.0.14.'CAP INV. OUT-767X --- DATED 08 :0 7 STATE HIGHIFA~ No. 7 - TI- -42- -III Gs -- -/f-~ 8 --3 e - SGHT 08 1 SIGHT D/ST = C ED 0 - PM - _3-- - --~ --_ -~ 1 21_ 1 NER - ' RELOCAT O/STING . 350* Fr PROPOSED TYPE 'R - INLET BOTH SIDES 1 RIM-7677.25 UGHT pOLE I / 680 / G ---------- -ca - - ----------t- - 4 â€¢ ----- --- 76.U ALUM. R 0.1, CAP - ---------------- -- 1 R36.00 , -. mrk/wi,~-' r, M,.,.aâ€¢, ,~ . 1,/-/ ./, 7678 1 1 ---- -0-$ 1--M - - Q ---0 - 7678 T 15,~~e. -/ - , A--\ . . 7 4 7 1 .. FT -1-----34=14 Â» . -7~-5=:=:L Â· ,- .-r- 7676 6.00 / 1 EV~_. ~ ~ -Z&22- r - /. 7 / r 5 f/ C I & 0 ' - ------ G - A cooT o . 1 ,-.--28&190Â«7<3 H- -- DATED 01/19 7 AT . -~~* ~4 UN/T- 2 ' S 76) \/ (1&"80*Aa, RE~ NNo', \ \ DE=9*44*D / ,- 0 .0 / , 97079 970 598, ~ f VOLUMEâ‚¬Q.11-AE. FT. / / < SEIER EASEMDIT '4613 sf )=FECE OF 1.â‚¬FS ..AD ~ _PEOPOSED SIGN LOCATIO,4 1~~Â»~ 97079 970 600, ~ 1 - 4" 1642 7--~ ~ " u' 1 ~ , L ' , . - - - -L> 5E 970~79~1 970 602 4 7676- FT-7701.25 - * A./ I FF=7Â®51~25 Al<T Alo * / -- -- 7678 ~ PMH- UNIT A14 - 7 1 41 m egx 2.234.5 d , v - 12.00 / 2.234.5 st - - 1 / . IN=76X . ..00 . M .1 i / / Ar". X G#GE 1 ' ~ UNIT 9 FF-7592.45 / ' / 5: imPA~ / // -- -9-4 \ 0. 0 0,1 * 4 ,i. ' UNIT M ; INV. OU~76* / s -' - UNIT A15 . 2,234.5 sf 1 2,234.5 Â¥f - i , 1,0 "~ 7.3.31 .: UNIT FF-769813 --- <X K I .SKE 1,613 s , 1 0=1:1:, -4 6 W /,A, / 60;&08 -4 x - FF-7695.44 1 x - PROPOSED 15' . 16 . / ff* U AJ 4% CULVERT - 4 f. 1.1. r / , ~'3'IS EWALK / r , *4 0\ 4 P AfTA HED CU I ,234.5 7007 , f \ tv- , e Zi' g ~ ta GUnER 46 1 FF-769.79 U All / / 1.- 4? 15* 45 sf i f. #kNI' FF-7688.79 4&1& 7688. . / */21 . 4 *LLÂ« 6*v- 7887.1 4 CURB CUT - 0- 4 412Â· 1 / 't V RU 1100 -/ *sm, // 4 + / / 7 47 | R HT OF 101 f ' PAW-5 x 22 24 '04 /0%144 - 1 166, \* / / 97 M / . . 1 i lili m/=7 .75 10..AGE / - 2,234.5 sf 12 0~ LU INV. IN- 681. ~ i .4 / /0 - / 1 / 92/ . T . =g2/f Iik T,/ 82 R12.00 \ INV. OUT 7 / M / / / b f.0 ~~T A 12 . 7 - / / / / / -k / 1 - -- /. / . / , . 0='' 4 11 / - - 1 4.5 sf ~ C ' 4 - - / 7898 , I 4 - StÂ· Mo,-0- -- M688 20' 1 ,/- Cl / 094 / // 7 - 0 , - 4/ , PRO#~SED 150 / :r- -'t~,4 /ADS CUL ERT I. / 10' ELECTRIC 2,234.5\ sf FOUND ' / 1600 / GO 4 :0 . 5:21; / 1 , 1 , F,-7,0435 / // . I 4514Â£3>12'P 1< 1 I / 2,234.4 sf 7, Â· sf 0.-8 , e , 1 -0- ./ . I / UNIT Al / , ~ UNIT A5 FF-7694.9 E ,04 5 - -1-- 19 2,23*~S 1 * *- *- * 1*am 5- --*- - - 1 95 ' e ..... , /, -ASED 271 0 - - -3 -Ok . FF=7698.50 *e 69~ UNIT\A7 - 8 % / 0 . 2ND FF-7718.00 I \ r FF=7688.50J '1' , k 1ST FF-7708.00 el/ 7089. / GARAGE fT-7696.00 , % 2214.Â»C / - *94, *P SHAD~ #7 12 ~ 1 - 1691, FF-7705.55 1 ./ 1 FF.7695.55 --- LANE \ 704 0 - ---- 'p P / / M 'v / - egh -- / r UNIT A6 / . - -D - - - \U -r , I / - 9. / POS Li~~ ~ 1 or / i - P.Al .. / -- il-- , I G. f -2. / 692.11 - A / . / ) UAII.Â· Ai' 2,234.5 st A '%Ott- - - 0 ;10 / 1100' 10 0 - - / ' , 1100 /04 / ,/ QULTI-FAMILY \Â«--|1 h 1 mr OF'VAY . 2,234.5 sf 1 /. // / / / FF=7699.57 - 7-81 // / /// ,~ RESIDENCE ~ % *13 r LU 1 1 1+1 2/r i I ~ .i. 1 0 SETBACK 7696 .-- / -- 15' NE, L / --- FF-7689.87 r Â· / / / --_-z'' ~'~ / i /- 30,000 sf r Â»/ \+ \ ' 4 0.- KM / 6/ / 7710 N 001 / 70 .So - .-, 1 - 1 / UGHT PO Y / / ~0~5- ~pg~#" P~00r f / ~/ , / * 1106 0 ; A Itt l' IA UNII>*16 n / PRO 1 PATIO / Mult o ;,234.5 sf , FF-7708.00 1 11 R e -S-7 _JR-~2&74_a.t12' AB 1 -7-- '7710 1 / --1 '80â€¢â€¢L-â€¢42 12' . Â· / FF-7>45.50 TOW-7712.50 ~1Ft-77~50 / / / ~ 211-6. ~ x_ lvW-7712,50 .12Â» / 770 ,// / / , A 11. / / E - ..a . / ------------ l / I / #M 167-ar / 1 / 10' SETBACK ' / 7 77814 / / a I , // 1 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED , 1 j ca=r - -- . . - 1--I- ./ / // W- .irÂ«. 9 DATE: REVISION: ~' ~ ~~~ 22_ ~~ --t9' ~~~U~ - BY: PROJECT TITLE: --- / 08/22/07 SEPARATE UNITS Al 42 JLR WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS 1- - Â».n--1 10/01/07 PER PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT MST *1 ACULATED - -~---- RROPERTY -------- CORNE. ~ '- R.30' / s ---s (biL SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION -- / S /- TS--7 LOT 28 1 VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISCON ,11 Ails -------- -- 41173#2~ ALUM. CAP / /- S -7 - ~ CAROLL G. DERMODY SHEET TITLE: CORNEMTONE s -NE-CORAIR 40$-4;- S - 34 ~ |~ 11 6 VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION ZONED E (ESTAE) VILLAGE ACRES SUB __---- DERREL L./BEVERLY M. MITCHELL r DO" Ct- Ar _---- -- . ZONES E (ESTATE) DRIVE X-SECTIONS DlmINS- SRNEÂ«Kf - ---- VI! 1 Af:F ArAFf QI,RnMgoN ii - m GOLF COURSE ROAD ENGIBilIMEMIIIE a SURVEYINQINC. DESIGNED BY WST APPROVED BY KMP JOB NO. SHEET SHFFT 1602 BIG THOMPSON <~ (970) 686-2458 SUrr: 200 DRAWN BY - DATE JULY 21 2007 487,002 511 CLIENT: Â£87= PARC CO. 80817 N~0 FAX (970) 686-2459 CHECKED BY WST SCALE AS SHOWN LEXINGTON LANE, LLC ADDmON NELS ACRES SUBDMSION (ESTA LANDSCAPE PLAN -<.. Z 4.. PROPOSED RIGHT TURN - - DECELERATION LANE ~ WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS (310 Fr) 20 0 20 40 60 - 4 SIGHT DISTANCE = 480 FT - ~ SCALE 1" = 20' - SIGHT DISTANCE\~= 420 FT EX/ST/NG 15* ~LCULVERT 1 1 6. <9) FF ;13 % ~11 1 JE*A 1 all & R IN k hr f#J. 01) Oi 1~ 23? lu . ID 1 ---0-- -- ---- / ZONED E (ESTATE) DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: - - -- ~II-- - - / ~---------~~~~~~- \ LOT 2A 11 ---- \ VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION 08/22/07 JIR WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS -- ~ ~ ~ SEPARATE UNITS Al -AZ \-111- - - --- -- ---- --- - I -- LOT 1 \ ~ HOWARD L. JONES 10/01/07 PER PREUWINARY STAFF REPORT MSL - MODIFY EXISTING 21 Â« 1 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION CORN*TONE VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION -'- j ZONED E (ESTATE) m up SHEET TITLE: NORTH SIDE 12" CULVERT EL-El=- - DARCY A. SPOOMER- 1 \ m pOT " ZONED--E- ?STATO \ ~ - ~ ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN mÂ¤N-!!Kla ~~ mmZYnÂ«~ 0Â«1 9, \ \ .. \ ~ DESIGNED BY RWS APPROVED BY _1â„¢p JOB NO. SHFFT- SHEET 1892 BIG THOMPSON (970) 680-2468 / \ DRAWN BY ...R*1= DATE JULY 25. 2007 487.002 611 CLIENT: 8718 PARL CO. 80617 407 FAX (970) 686-2469 SUITE 200 -1 , 1 .. CHECKED BY MST SCALE AS SHOWN LEXINGTON LANE, LLC SAGER A UBDIVISION BARTON A. DANNELS ZJNECDHERLE (RH~SIiDENTIAL) T DISTANCE = 180 FT ED /~M//Pd-- . .'Xi:â€¢28 . I . Vil/%94:lill'llaili:wj:,/EXEMA,m:m:elilim2i11Ille'll/5//2//5/Ji"'I.:.1- I . ah==g,-I'll---ill- .......r-=~R=3,7-SH.'ll='W-'~~ - )-Ii-~~~ e -b..984,0)~ ,~.1-- 0 1--Ii'riliwi-~-- -4Â¥e. D---,- i.Â£7 '124,......./..~,1/5/0/ .rillb.em/22033.61"'IR//mel/9/1,)44&5:'llilliliz"w//9,li/,"/5,5/1 ..Ill"./ - X- 9 \ 4*kils.-- 62 0 .--- 1.-Â» * I = -'*jif L. ~--- - : /9/4 A 0 -949.f....1, .k:* e,4 ...7 : 4 _1 ~AA 0 -In'/4/'liEN,#18:ililill'Imill'll'/3"ligil'Hill'iNiA ~Ck @4"E~ ~~av~ 0- $014, â€¢m . . ilillillillimillillimillilille' 'I : - ,-G--......4 .Ii 4* ---7~~~~~~~ .Pr~ .. -1- Fpilp-*'- 1.0 V.'* ,.*~4,91 .0/0 . Â®<, ORÂ¢K , 0 A . r ~ * wÂ°~--1*~ . I. 4 Ge.. -V ../................../..............7/'.-./. /:5.2/Â®1~.=01:*41â‚¬~~-- .*P. lb.-- -*I . e -601;-4 -â€¢r --elin,y, -*211 i //- -./. ....BilldLI-/. IIF*AI~ Â£20-' . , 0 :44. liler<lia 600/, .. A .'..~I---PAW.-"Wr . A#b<,41.. -44-51//0./..Fill*, . D 0 0.0 18â€¢R...1 ;11%4/Apg<- 90.:01.-:.-0- --l,- allill'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'/Ill/A ./ilillillilll//7/millilillillillillillillillillilli~illi -/.06#*IA< A.**1,2:il'Joill//IMI'lililliwillk<limlEilliwililioillill,Illimillilizill:Will'lli -4 9 -*e>g 0.../*710601*"*4* e.*//:S/,ME:Em/11'*9*k'- --0-0 . , libity/* VI'<imaigilimami --9 7.09<14.- 2 liA . 0 - I-.,CW:l .. r W..S:jimi#0004 7" AC'/9, .. 9 K .....1620/In....44.r--:f-- . . -1.-M=MI 'lillillilib.*Aillillillillilli~illillir. ./-1 9.,%".pr - *.gE.5.1 00- . - 4 -4 0 ) ~ir Alallillilil" liaillillillvi 47- 11'#li 1 CW -0, 43, D 46 0 . fl- 2 26. - 4. . 1 . . - 42 - 1, e e e.: 0 - I - . - A"~-'- . . .0 .. :D . -. .1 .- .. I â€¢ INL L ..: . I .. Im..0, . . I /1 LANDSCAPE PLAN WAPITj CROSSING-CONDOM+NI-UME- 2--1--ELL STATE HIGHWA t No. 7 RELOCATE EXISTING - S/GH~/STA CE = 350:* FT ~ PROPOSED TYPE 'R SIGH'k DISTA CE = 340* FT - - - - FOUND 1â€ž BENT PIPE & - -- LIGHT POLE INLET BOTH SIDES 1-1/4" ALUM. CAP PLS ---- _ (6) PA #6499, BOTH DISTURBED " (CAP BEARS S86'09'49"E, ---------- ---- \ 1 r ALUM. R.O.W. CAP R3 00 E 1 i \ BENCHMARK ELEV-7692.70 4 ,___ -------S - - ---------------- -- ---- -- 1 ROM 1 CALCULAitU CORNER) % . 8 .9 P - I-%K -- - --%-1-*-*r--- L 0-Al - -- . M . -- 0 769 - - - ~ / e . . .-to*- 0 6.0 1 30 - = .., 9 _ _ - G - -- .1 - /' I I '.. . d - \ - I--1-- -- - . 4 4 --- , 6 0 --------- 4 eli \ I \ /1 4Â»P . -- -- 371 0/ /1~"P 0â€žpp 10 C .- -. -2- - 14-El_ 1 7 CR I KA IGN LOC loA - 25' 1 40Â£71 - -.1 - SETBACK i / /. --- --- , \1\ . - - 2 P-- -- t- -4 -- 81 &932*W -5160 ep. i ' f'.| * UNIT Al 4 / \ 63) PA -- / - 0 1 2,234.5 sf ~, R85.00 4 F - -GARAGE ~~ 12.06 - Â· -- -0 \ i FF=77033.81~,0 - 1 20 P 1 9.13' O-pA FÂ¥=1693.9 // (AVIT A 15 - --2-- - - \ 2. --- y \ (Trp) 1 .. . 7%004 / 1 -- I. - //// 1 ~ GARAGE *--:: 0 ~.0% .20 34.5 sic /-- 4- - \\- $ i / 1- - 1 1 2/ ' _ -FF=770544 (5) (A #* '' ~ 121 \Â»-3-7 7 +1 1 1 ~ ' / - - FF= 7695.44 0 \ U Ki-2 . 4 4 PCR - 4... // \ 2 N . -80% 1 9 40 \ . 44<9*4 - - - \ X - 42 %%10 / 0 , \ h 14 0, 10"Pp Ldo"F1"1 - _ 698. 187 - -- i pp -35* x . ~/ 41 . 0 -/ 0 * 711 -19 .V \ \ GARAGE f - - 1 I - -- - -- 30"P ~ ' 11 1.,f~ 1 /1 4 - . ABM \ ALL G SY / \ .~ 1 -4 / i / -- 9 . / \ O.pp AR SHALL InT 1 / -1 12' B EEDED WITH 4/ / , 0 / 19./ b 1 \ 77â‚¬ GRASSES- ---_.. Uz *hASSY CR , 40 ..3-. MIX. ' SETBACK *EAS SHALL ~- ..04\933 - R23' 1100 MlH Â»1LD'WÂ»tR -- 1 r \/41 - (6) POT . 0 \ I - 1 1 Â»1 E SEEDED WITH . SSC 2,234.5 sf . SSC \ | ,~ 15 R. 4NGRASSES , 7 I \ 4 -\ FE=7705.57 r X*DFLOWER FF=7695.57 / b 40 . Â£ 2.00 '' - 0(. %/ - . '4 / - 1/ \ - 9 1. 5* 1 "pp , ra"PP ----- 247 /- - 0 398 - TOW #2. i 4 - - -- -- 0 ' 5) /64 -- SC . r' .-- \\- /\\ \\ h. 18 PP / -- ' ~<y*7-- SS 1 / 00 1 0,~3 4 "PPI - ----0 T ...L ;. 1696 ~Q jU)E~~ GO # 96 .- PUL Kil#F2"pp % 191 6\ 0 \ A- 4 , A.,=211 \ H k \ M (5) KA if :,~Br. LIM/73 OF \ ~D/STUREANCE ~-112<79; \M ~121 18 P TOW=7705.50 1 28Â»PP f 4 01 1 -0- 6- % WIN .... 74.4. I %/ <--7 ,- -- --- ---- -N--- 15" :\./ 00 / / 4 \ I - 4 / ABM- r / -- E- / 2( 41 j . . 2ND FF=7718.00 --.,0. \ 2 \1 2, \ / 1ST FF=7708.00 20" peopos O 0 ~~~ (2) \ \ GARAGE FF=7696.00 1 -/. 7 0 ' TY ) ' (5) KA ------------- 'p ------ . 1 ~ m~Mp '......... . h~/tz 36 'PP / 1 9 . /// 4 . - 7 0 1. 1 1 /, ~ 5\9<-- -14,74: f' 0 '(2) KA . 2 POT -- SIDE - / 12 // 4 0 , - Â£%11 ---- . t.. 4 .f Â· 0 '1 7,Â·Zi. g ~EXISTING\ -~ . VOSENT - / (6) POT ~~~ / SHED 1 F ~- L- 438 sf ~ ~ 36"PP a / --- ---------- TRY -__-- . o MP 1106 70 r X y Nk.42 . PLANT GUIDE -- - ------- . -(31*B 1 1 / ' 3) pO - / Eft - - i- .'-MOLTI- FAMILY - - 0 Ip - RESIDENCE - - , 1 N:*,-- .........A .9 I (0 LU 1 / 1 - / / \000\ & ~~\ DECIDUOUS TREE / / I 30,000 sf 9,4 i 1. 0 1 7708 P .6 %*P 1 ' (2) PO 7710 1 Bps i 9.50 EXISTING / ti r- to 1 CABIN O.P (\10$41420 fh CONIFER TREE / / & 0 / to, / 1491 sf ~ - 0 "2 44 - PATIO - 63) / / 1 44 1.4- 1 1.5 sf --..~(*) BAR 4 . 209 Ch ORANMENTAL TREE FF=7708.00 ' - TOW=7712.5 . ><51% Mp i W SIN 09.50 /// .-- -TO-W=7712.50 \\ \\7.1 2: as -- . (2Â»QT L/ . " * MP' ) Mp UP - -- - - -- -V . 1 1 - 1 - 26Â»P ' - -- Â· i ~ b < *'â„¢~ EXISTING TREES 0 'L - 10 (4) POT ( POT . \ -- I e e . - 0 2 --\ \ \ . . 1100 0/ 10' S 8-2 ~J TREES TO BE REMOVED '. L k . . 0 "P. .. - (3) ----- . 67 ~ ' H- dHO ------- .----- 741 ) - - OHP ----- 3 0 5 0"E 879.68 C)_ _ - - - 2 /. -- (3) BAR 1 FOUND CENTER N 1/16 / ~ FOUND #4 REBAR /\ .- 09 -~ (* Â®548' E 886.5' (P) BASIS~ OF BEARING (3)- / LOT 4 CORNER OF SECTION 31, T5N. / W/ YELLOW PLASTIC ~~120) VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION R72W BEING A 1 - 1/4" ALUM. CAP #9485 (3) BAR SOO'48'~E 1310.05' ,~.,. VARIOUS SHRUBS (EL MICHEAL R. MANGELSEN/SUSAN K. O'CONNOR (7) SHL CAP PLS #6499 LOT 1 (3TSHL- s (3) SHL ~ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ZONED E (ESTATE) ' PINE KNOLLS SUBDIVISION VILLAGE ACRES SUBDIVISION \ H CAROLE B./BARRY K. STEIN (3) SAL CAROLL G. DERMODY Ns ZONED E (ESTATE) ZONED E (ESTATE) 1 1 1 1 -- 0 - s .11~ 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. COPYRIGHT - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: - , 1 10/01/07 PER PRELIWINARY STAFF REPORT WRT WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS 1 -s SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION CORNEASTONE r--1 SHEET TITLE: SOUTH SIDE 20 0 20 40 60 1 SCALE 1" = 20' 7 -s LANDSCAPE PLAN DICHNEERING & ~1<1. N~.SURVErBa ING DESIGNED BY _RW~_ APPROVED BY _EME JOB NO. SHEET SHFFT 1002 SIG INOMPSON ,~0,1~~/"" (9707680-2408 surr: 200 1 1--- DRAWN BY -REZ~ DATE JULY 25. 2007 487.002 7 11 CUENT1EXINGTON LANE, LLC mnls PAR~. Co. 80517 Nk,f/ FAX (970) 658-2489 / 1 1 1 - CHECKED BY WST SCALE AS SHOWN . - VH12/VA ~ff iHO~OHZ * S~VUD 1 an scaping equiremen s or s ee PLANT LIST NOTES: rojec ame: TREES FIN in the blue boxes to get landscaping totals. Use this spreadsheet in conjunction with the Estes Valley Development Code Landscape 1 SYM I COMMON NAME I SOTAN/CAL NAME I M/N S/ZEI 1. All areas disturbed by construction to be Regulations. In some coses, your proposed subdivision or development may be exempt from some landscaping requirements. ~ PA ~ PATMORE ASH ~ Fraxinus pennsylvanica "Summit" ~2" Cal ~ revegetated with designated seed mixes. STEP 1: Impervious Coverage Requirements ~ SHL ~ SHADEMASTER HONEYLOCUST ~ Gleditsia triacoanthos inermis "Shademaster"~2" Cal ~ 2. Topsoil shall be stripped in areas of disturbance 1 Tree and Three Shrubs for Every 1,000 Square Feet of Lot Area Excluding Parking Lots with 30 Porking Spaces or More Gross Impervious Coverage: 109,550 ~ ABM ~ AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ~ Acer x fremon# Veffersred' ~2" Cal ~ and stockpiled to be redistributed to a depth of 4" umber of minimum when revegetation is begun. Parking Lot Area: 0 Parking Spaces: ~ SSC ~ SPRING SNOW CRAB ~ Malus 'Spring Snow' ~2" Cal ~ 3. All seeded areas to be hydromulched at a rate of Net Impervious Coverage: 109,550 ~ PCR ~ CANADIAN RED CHERRY ~ Prunus 'Canadian Red' ~2" Cal ~ 1 1/2 tons per acre. All seeded slopes greater than Tr-: 0 2:1 to be mulched and netted for erosion control (use Shrubs: 94 straw bales where needed to avoid erosion and Note: AH other landscaping requirements hove been applied. Net impervious coverage subtracts out parking lot area only if the parking lot hos thirty or more spaces. PIP COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE Picea pungens glauca 6'-8' tall enhance growth potential). STEP 2: src u er equ remen s 4. All planting beds to be excavated to a 12" depth 8 Evergreen Trees and 11 Shrubs per 100 Uneor Feet and backfilled to an elevation of 2" below walks or North Boundary Distance in Feet: Eost Boundary Distance in Feet: lawns with soil mix consisting of: 1/3 topsoil, 1/3 Evergrien Trees: O SHRUBS Evergreen Trees: O peatmoss, and Sh e: 0 h ba: fir-[COMMON-NAMEBOTANICALNAMEMINSIZ 1/3 existing soil. South Boundary Distance in Feet: 250 West Boundary Distance in Feet: 80 5. Cover all planting beds with soil fabric prior to Evergreen Trees: 20 Evergreen Tr-: 70 plant installation. S rub : 28 Sh bÂ®:97 KA ~ KARL FOERSTER ~ Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Kart Foerster' ~ 5 Gol Note: Parking Lot Perimeter requirements for side and rear lot lines have been applied. 6. Install 30" wide cobble and gravel foundation ~ POT ~ POTENTILLA ~ Potentilic fruticosc -Goldfinger,Katherine ~5 Gal ~ STEP 3: She Fron age uffers border around all buildings. Shrubs may be planted MP ~ MUGO PINE ~ Pinus mugo 'Mops' ~ 10 Gal ~ within this border as shown on plan. Arterial Streets - 1 Tree Per 25 near Feet and 1 Sh b Per 10 near Feet North Perimeter Distance in Feet: 0 East Perimeter Distance in Feet: 888 ~ BAR ~ ROSE GLOW BARBERRY ~ Berberis thunbergil 'Rose Glow' ~5 Gal ~ 7. All trees shall have a wood mulch ring 36" in Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 Tnes: 36 Shrubs: 89 RS RUSSIAN SAGE Perovskia atriplicifolia 5 Gal diameter at the base of the tree. South Perimeter istonce in Feet: 0 West Perim te Distance in Fee: 0 Trees: Sh bs: 0 Trees: 0 ShrubsÂ· 0 8. All tree rings and shrub beds to be mulched or Non-Arterial Streets - 1 Tree per 40 Linear cobbled at a minimum depth of 31 material to be Feet and 1 Shurb per 15 Unear Feet determined by owner. No h Perimeter Distance in Feet: 330 o t Perime er ist nei Fe: Trees: Shrubs: 22 Tree Â· hrub: 9. All trees to be staked, fenced and guyed. South Perimeter Distance in Feet: 0 West Perimeter Distance i Fee : 0 10. All trees and shrubs shall be drip irrigated and all Trees: 0 rubs: 0 T s: 0 h bs: 0 plant materials maintained in a healthful condition. To I Streets 11. Conifer trees be sized as 50% eight feet tall and North Perimeter ast Perimeter ***NOTE: Trees: 8 S rubm: 2 Trees: 36 rubs: VARIOUS CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS SHRUBS WILL BE PLANTED AS BORDERS , FOUNDATION 50% at six feet tall, Deciduous trees sized as 50% at South Pertrneter PLANTS, AND PLANTING BEDS. OTHER SPECIES NOT SHOWN MAY BE USED, REFER TO LANDSCAPE four-inch caliper and 50% at two-inch caliper. W-t meter ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL.ELEVATED PLANTERS PLANTINGS TO BE DETERMINED, USE WOOD MULCH 12. Placement of plant material that fronts parking Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 h..: 0 Shrube: 0 Note: Street Parking Lot Perimeter and Fence/Woll FOR COVERAGE. PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE COVERED WITH COBBLE OR MULCH AS DETERMINED BY Landscaping requirements have been applied. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECL PLANTINGS SHOWN ADJACENT TO ALL STRUCTURES ARE CONCEPTUAL stalls shall conform to Estes Valley Development Code AND NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANT COUNT. THE DEVELOPER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE All.0.4.d plants within overhang of vehicle bumper. STEP 4. ar ng o er me er equ remen s THESE PLANTINGS AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 13. Plant material shall meet the American For Parking Lois with 6 or More Spaces" Arterial Streets - 1 Tree per 20 Linear Feet and 1 Shrub per 5 Linear Feet Association of Nuserymen specifications for #1 grade. North Perimeter Distance in Feet: East Perimeter Distance in Feet: O Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 South Perimeter Distance in Feet: 0 West Peri eter Distance in Feet: 0 Trees: hrubs: 0 Trees: 0 Sh sÂ· 0 NOTE: Non-Arterial Streets - 1 Tree per 30 Linear Feet and 1 Shrub per 10 Linear Feet PROTECT TREE MTH 5' TALL WIRE No h Perim ter istonce in Feet: E s Perimeter Dista ce n Fee : O FENC&49 1'-f DeVE GROUND. FENCE TO REMAIN UNTIL PLANT Trees: S rub : 0 Trees: 0 hrubs: 0 CAN SURVIE KOUFE DAMAGE South Perimeter Distance in Feet: O West Perimeter Distance in Feet: O DECIDUOUS TREES: WRAP TRUNK W/4' TREE Eâ‚¬IGREEN TREES: STAKE & GUY USNG 3 Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 WRAP FROM BOTTOM UP TO FIRST BRANCH a STAKES O 120' AROUND TREES. NO SECURE STAKE & GUY USING 2 STAKES SPRAYING OR WRAPPING Side and Rear Lot Lines - 1 Tree per 30 Linear Feet and 1 Shrub per 5 Unear Feet SPACED 180; No h Pe m ter Distance 'n Feet: O 3 P meter ist nen Fee Â· O TreesÂ· Sh bs: 0 Trees: h bs: 0 DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING South Perimeter istance in Feet: 0 We t Perimete Dist nei FeÂ· O PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER UMBS. CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. Trees: Shrubs: 0 TreesÂ· rub: SOME INTERIOR â„¢GS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEER. DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT Total Parking Perimeter Plontings EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE mUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP h East OF THE ROOT BALL TREES WHERE lHE TRUNK Tr-: Sh ubs: 0 Trees: 0 hru s: 0 MARK THE NORTH SDE OF THE TREE FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE RE.ECTED. IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE 1REE DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT South West TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER BALL WITH SOIL Trees: O Shrubs: O Tr s: 0 r bs: O POSSIBLE 0.5 IN. DIAM. MULCH RING PLAS11C HOSE 8 FT. DIAM. WIN. STE 5: Interlor Parking Lot Requirements GALVANIZED WIRE OIl CaE For parking lots with thirty or more spaces, 6% of the lot must by landscaped with planted islands. One tree and 2 SET TOP OFF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO TWIST WIRE TO TIGHTEN. shrubs per 2,500 square feet of parking lot. GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. 1.5 x 1.5 IN. Parking Spaces: O EXCAVATE TREE PIT TO 2X BALL DIAME1ER. HARDWOOD STAKES OR OTHER crl<ing o Area: 0 8 IN. APPROVED STAKE MATERIAL 3 IN. MULCH. DO NO PLACE 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER Landscape Islands square feet : 0 MULCH IN CONTACT MTH TREE TRUNK. !,T,,, MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR MAINTAIN UNDER ALL TOPO CONDITIONS BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL Mini um Num er of Trees: A MINIMUM OF THREE YEARS AFTER 1,1,- REMOVE ALL â„¢NE, ROPE AND PUNnNG ' I.~;~1',1,4~61. 'ti,I,4'â€¢116* p, itit BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL Minimum Num er f h ubsÂ· 0 1,11,7 1 '11,1 1 F PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND STEP 6: Fences and Walls Adjacent to Streets UNDSTURBED SUBGRADE - ~ THE ROOT BAU. CUT THE MRE BASKET AND REMOVE. PLANT GUIDE 1 Evergreen and 3 Shrubs per 40 Linear Feet of Fence/Wall - PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL ~ DEC/DUOUS 77?EE TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL North Fencing/Wall Distance in Feet: o East Fencing/Wall Distance in Feet: BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE ~ CON/FER 77*E SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. V Trees: 0 hrubs: 0 T es: 0 Sh s: 0 NOTES - 0 ORMNME?V7*L 77?Â£1 ALL STAXES SHALL BE Dm,EN OUTSIDE South Fencing/Wall Distance in Feet: o West Fencing/Wall Distance in Feet: 0 DE EDGE OF DIE ROOT BALL (-13 0=77NG REES Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 Trees: 0 Shrubs: 0 ASSURE THAT THE BEARING SURFACE OF FE PROETIVE COVERNG OF â„¢E NRE OR CABLE AGAINST THE TREE TRUNK IS A MINIMUM OF 0.5 IN.. AL DREES 70 BE g*kin REMOVE STAIONG AS SOON AS THE TREE HAS GROWN SUFFICIENT ROOTS TO RESIST THE HIGH WINDS THAT REQUIRED THE TREE TO BE STAKED. Grand Total ~ VARIOUS SHRUBS Total Trees This Plan: WRE OR CABLE SIZES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: UW 114 Added __ 80 Existing 1REES 2.5 K TO 3 IN. CAUPER - 12 GAUGE TREES UP TO 2.5 IN. CALIPER - 14 GAUGE Existing Trees Total Trees Includes 90 District Buffer 00 rees 194 Total Mi us 80 Ever reen Trees Added: 54 Ever reen Trees Required: 134 TIGHTEN WIRE OR CABLE ONLY ENOUGH TO KEEP FROM SUPPING. ALLOW FOR SOME TRUNK MOVEMENT. PLAS1IC HOSE oa ru s 00 ru s Total Shrubs SHALL BE LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOWMODATE 1.5 IN. OF GROWTH AND BUFFER ALL BRANCHES FROM THE WIRE Added: 29 Re uired: 329 This Plan: 331 TUCK ANY LOOSE ENDS OF THE WIRE OR CABLE WTO THE NRE *RAP SO THAT NO SHARP VIRE ENDS ARE EXPOSED. Notes: Generally, landscaping requirements ore not cumulative. All landscaping requirements may be used to satisfy impervous A : N: : PROJECT TITLE: lei coverage landscaping. Street landscaping, i.e., landscaping for street frontage buffers, parking lot perimeters, and fences and TREE PLANTING DETAIL - B&B TREES IN ALL SOIL TYPES WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS i walls adjacent to streets is not cumulative. This spreadsheet automatically subtracts parking lot permimeter and fence/wall .V requirements from the street frontage buffer requirements. It then totals all trees and shrubs in every landscaping category NOTE: THIS DETAIL ASSUMES THAT THE PLANTING SPACE IS LARGER THAN 8 FT. ORNE#STONE other than impervous coverage and subtracts this total from the number of trees and shrubs required for impervious coverage. SQUARE. OPEN TO THE SKY, AND NOT COVERED BY ANY PAWNG OR GRATING. SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE THIS DETAIL IS TYPICAL IN NTENT ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL AD.UST HIS Existing significant trees count towards the total number of required trees. WORK TO ACCOMODATE ALL CONDITIONS. DETAILS .Â«.1.-a y= 1 OC DESIGNED BY RWS APPROVED BY ia. m imii;@3* N~I%#p,~830-2.00 =- 200 DRAWN SY _RWL_ DATE JULY 2007 487.002 8 1 1 LOFTUS DEVELOPMENT,INC. CUENT: 892= Pg CO. 80017 N~7 FAX (070) 580-2400 CHECKED BY MST SCALE AS SHOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 07 TYPICAL WALK-OUT - TRIPLEX WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS ~ ~ -~ SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION 1 1--Â·---Â·-1------------i---1SHEET TITLE: 1 THE MWIERN GROUP, LTD, ~=~==1===========1===i BUILDING ELEVATIONS H ARCHITECTUREÂ·PlANNINGÂ·INTERIORS 1 DOIGNED â€¢r __Le___ IAâ€¢ROVED gr _Mâ€¢LL__a_NL_12Â£Er I SHEETâ€¢ 1 1730 BLAKE STREEI SUITE 435 DENVER COLORADO 80202 303 297 3334 FAX 303 292 2601 .......... ~ilit"tibl,A -*.....................Ill.- -lie:::'::::::me'le':me:2111~'H./.6,0.:.:::i,:ime 2.1 ;dilimirli-Ilillillf j ta 0.Â£6*r,:m-n.ii.iii:i:i ~ -ii,iu.,i:,11-I-11 0, L, - _ -~1~17,1,Qji,I-23324&1-lii:16~111, fl Li, -dili...imilwailimi â€ž â€¢u'limilu . _ =~imi,~â€¢#*imi ~~|~~~~m' -/........U- .............E- 1,1.. 11 ' .Et, m-=:=:= - Y==' BE,*0. 0-A.~-i--21,11,â€žâ€ž, -....=.-~..-III-~~., -Ii.---=,----- -'&:4.Â·. ~7'-i --i-/I--Il-T=~MerefQe:~111:'M='=~i=::==::=~I - . ....... 1, I ' . 0.: ..al'... 1.kÂ·. A . 'ki...1. '4:42 -- 11-111-1.- A i 1, ~de~ir VEK*Mil~ 5 - .i:m. ~4 -g-~-/ -tlllll~~'.~Hili&~Â£1</'i "~I~~i:~I~ikM~~~1. tii#~~Il 1... i - ...ifi~trild~419<2,~~13~33~t4l.rt. â€¢li.--~LIA <<Tfi--1,Â·*.99+.EEUE ~ 3,12~,si~~El:I,~1&E:.2-li -- ......i-,--- 1 --- - - - - /1 ru,47216 2-M-â€¢trge. -- .--5;%:9-:12=XE;Id,Eim - : -74///' & Ati.==,g=..i...//////N///////////4- - mio-44#%,m ~~F~~i#m#Miny.%*1'**--"B~-5 Pdl~ 47373' Elkke-2-2~*~<f~le~~'-- Il :r..4.E~Yis:il D. A 0 D. 0 0. ADA. A 0 1. 0 - Â£4 - -Mik,411,111,w- ~.~, lillial- ---- lilli ~ ------Ii.-- i-111-1" .-'-'I--I..."--'I'.-1--'-*"'--01- lillill-.Ililll,1,11!Illhmillillill f 11-1-1.Ill ---JEA m= -CE ,'~im~*4 JL 83 r--21-11-,1-111 .1.11@11...u'luill 'i/!!Imill!!1#1!Li."Ill".".0./././../All!.1!!!!!!! i././././././.8.u.l~~IlI/-1~.I./..1/~/I./"11" I"z-/ 1!1_ . =.....................N..........-I - - ..... 1. -'--------%--.~--- A 8050 Â£=gi~luinimililill'~~Ilii"ililligu~f"ll ~.I~'I-~..-~.f~~'.~'Ili---'~-I...'I....'I---1 1 i.1,-11-11-: -- ,., bll. - -',-1.11I, .11...h 4,1'*. Ulill fillill'lilill'llill lillit lilli. , 9,---4 . .:-1.- 1-1. i. =~E31,11.1,011 ...1.&~ 2=4 1.1 ... 11251 - 4/.1, - ..~'ll'~illia~-2-1-ui~:#i X~, 32..&*ce/:i=~41 .am=,&,011 mimi MmiEille:- +22 ijailjpt&18=:= ====-1-/,im- ;7- 00 I A .0 0 . 1 D . ... A l7 1. D ~......~.....i ... a 1 . ..0 --=#*-Il--I-------I-Illillilll-Ill.....Il.I---I......k ...11- 111'.7----%-1--=........0.1....49&-- 1,11. 1' 0,1, Writ -: - % .DÂ·-t e ye' ~~1111111."...vi.,lill'limiliniflillif~lijihi:.Lillillilf*)~1111Â£Ill/~..11 1"Flf-'95"4**1 -':::::::':::*- 1 1 - . 1. 1 0 =--*S.. =391-==:imm'*FREMj//2//2212/11//2111/1.9/imwailimmilillillimili~ilim.mi,Ellimililililillim.~i.,ime-e.ed:i,~~~:E:E:E:E:E:E:/:i:/:lisi~~5:,6,-693'' =:,ie:,i:i~ == ~i#= - lgE::2;lill:~1 :111! ! -1-I-1 Emfe; 8.. elilillTN irililjlr~h~I,Ili,~ ,%11 .-~6 -- L -- '.rl 11.1,1.1 1~11'it@ "111'~11!2"111â€¢i !81- f 1,~*1%*- ~A , 1. )-91 4,~.7-, -'.' 914-:ii,1.II%,1 8.-.m1 ,....ut.,;12:......--..ze=:! -==-------- 9 ....N1l. 1-! 11 ~...F/9-.4 . ti=t[ ill'.9,(,6=1 !!::1!-' ~t:nt,A ~:;,-.:t=Zy - ~li;:;;:BAâ‚¬166116:ii:--:;Ea~!.-'5~-~1 , r~S-~. .1 . -,h/li---i---4*h.,-l----llm. 1~ 11%3&*166-El--emi:*aa<,14--..--- -- 4:2 31~4 h , Et*i .Â·- Â· 'Â· u~~|riltÂ»fw,;06*1~~~'0 5-'.- ~--7.. ..#-3 Â· .Â·Â·Â·Â· .3 4 Â£ L Â· 1 1 1 1 .D. , 4-4.-p!=:<-RF 483/i.. 0.#Ete<I ' 9,44 50*tÂ»Â« ~ FULit,A 7;~10#3'~!1~!~ 4 : I. 6..EB,rN-*~Al ftp#' + .. I- ,* 44<-,1,-=-- 1~-~ ~ I< ~â€ž< 4 -; 3 - -27/Lv,-2-,1 MI- . liw. i~nliiiifiiiii Liiiiib . ,i , , - 4: 1- I. 11, A - 'fo~iliwililli~llmm I.- /1/1 I.WIFJIM,111'1 1.0. D . 1 0 0 D . D - 3.lilli=mi DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS / t ly an i .. ~. i . 1 k\\ / k LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION , TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK -. 'EJ--k ne rn_ AA (/ <fil 4 gil 34 #r . 4 4 -11 \ i 10 M . 1- N /'.4 t\J '' IL-2- f--7-7- * '\ , N i...A 3 4 4/--drts - 2 6 /1-ShÂ« 4 N 4 7'. [1 -1. ) /1 - i 11 te@F~ e-=-=-- m DATE: i REVISION: i â€¢i: -I PROJECT TITLE: .- . ERQXLELEMATION=-MULTI-EAMILY 1 4rrZRI WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMWIUMS I ~ ~----Â·-Â·Â·--4----------------+-----4 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION I ~=====p==========~===~=F;m;----~ THE MULHERN GROUP, LTD, b==::=zz=\~===22=~ BUILDING ELEVATIONS ~ ARCHETUREÂ·PLANNINGÂ·INTERIORS 1 Destoâ€¢ED F 7 ]APPRovED m -MgM_ L__,!20.-NQ.--1-SHECU-SHEEI-1~ 1730 BLAKE STREET SUITE 435 ~ DIMIN IY __LL_ | DAIE JULY 214 2007, COLORADO 80202 r06074-GuENT--~ DENVER d Oil 11 LbF'Tus DEVELOPMENT,INC. 1 F 197 3334 FAX 303 292 2601 0 0 . .. .. 0 . A. . IliE*: . A . I ..... 11 .~ ---'--*'-/-/-'I-/-* Y.'--/"--"/=--"..///--"./.----/----/..--:"/'----/:.//'- - , 1 -1=-1-1 Ii,In ,I,I I ~# 2: IiiirriiiiiwEM ~## <i66.-:fii,- I~II)<Bi*pa*#~Ii,â€ž-1.<Il Ii*~0~ 1,1-~11YivE#j, -1-It.1-1 -10.-1 -1. I Of-7114&-9 ' . A D -Ezzl,L- 21Â¥'.;3 .1 - , 4 1.imil'-1-:-~ - . f ..... i ,& ::':lie::~li~.~~~~~~~~~~i ..7--1-Illill :#.-..: A .i, .TI"'1111 -1 .~ WMA////7//-92/BE~V--fr#La/-mr-=-1/$314//1//R/QLF/1/:&16,*463 11â€¢1-â€¢jiâ€¢3/ -- -A-. -i~=-1--1- w ~.-1.=61.6 F A .4 1 *=*4.- FEESERimbW~.----ule#Â¥E, 564-= -C -S.-=-u 254.-B..~1-'~51 -1 --0 122111 1 11-dz.â€žE a -. s : D -*-Ve,---71-I"= --A ':26.Â¥91 -t--.**, --------- A ... MI//Milmi~~..lil 1 0 A A D. . D .-lil.- 1/.mig"10./. 1 Willii' ll'llill'llilillillill'll'llillill i 1 0,1 ... 1 0 A <D -V--MS-.-.'--".--'-"'.~".-----.--..~.."'---6-- Ilill ~./../ t.-11. ail~Ve=~S---"Ill--=-Il--lili-- --i~ .)~i~. .r Â».F;A -I----I~-il-~ -1 -1. .1111'*'<1" e 1 .111.11.11 1-11-ltrY-11-1-1-11 1 .A~. I. ..'.1- 1 I ..4+ .'IF .- I. liM!-1-1-1-fill -1-1-1 1 ~&4,.,ge~~222 liNI~Illl'~ill**ire~%*f't ,'0fâ€žIs~~ ~~: 311; 11 +4'*TEIV~.2<41 11~11*1Il-" ..1// 1 ~.1~11- .---Â·1 -- ',414; -~..â€ž,--.6.-~..â€ž1,-U~Iia.i.,1-=M.HEA-*4,---1-1 1-:,--,-lil ~,~ Awde,ee~ 4â‚¬ I. .1444 1 . . 1/ 9/ 11./1,l',11.11-=i~di 14*?h'011*14. . lilli/21:5;OI~~1/i/~ W.fÂ¥ Amill'- ==---'/-11 *-.-1 1 , .1.11./.111 0, . 1#.7/ 4.~f.11,11 . i -1< r lm,~,i,1I~F. -- A .. .. 1 =6//1...Il'./- . =.119,14 ."1.-1 1.11 0 .- j~Illl 1*~ACK~@H~i-~ILI~I)~IIL f 11--;~-EE#=.==.. _ .. -_ -_ 1.lipliddpimmplmilqi:Ilim:lug Ililli 9..~ .41, 2 1.11 il=,6-"--! '9 *1 | Ilmilill~ 4:,2188.f.IIHI'"Iffm"'u~e I ~~~ W -/ 3 : *11 1 Fil - M--1-=.--4 == B Z~= Uil@~e,~1 12~ 1 7,2731-- : 1 rik-kir~-=252#a" warm F lit ~~-iI~i~g~~112~ 0 -- A. A A 1 a , 'B= , - '.1 -- i .,.1, I".In' 1 4Â·;a<A, 1#14*Ap*vi lillmllmlill*Imllil **A&------------I.11,1Ulli,Illl~~ ~Â·14;94% .1.11.K.1.111.1~11..1~1-1.1 1-111.11.11 .,4*jr:<Sm 1.,Â· re Â·t. I -11 11.lili. - ...I--- *111..11'lli:*d Â·-1 1 4 it--1-1- -iilil: F i -I.... I =-Illill.I--il--9-=I--Il--Il/--I--I'M=-il----3 - ----I ' hip'*%9* i I itti~?#~i,Â¢4?Â· A =ill -----,1222-=:==:=m ---.=1 2~---~â€¢--iff- = =â€¢@~ i i 1 1,1,&4.J.11.1.1.111. I. 1.1..'-1.1 .31 'r: ' 1 1.f 14'21- .: .... 4-1 --,1 - 1.-El = 1~ r , 1, .,A~ 6-1.237,1 1....4 1.11--11' IM *i-11 11 il~~~Ii *Ill'*'imi:t i 1.... ~=, 1 2â€¢â€¢ 4* 1@42*Iâ€¢â€¢â€¢Mi:ji- x:,ir ilibc 4.1 ..1 -I'll' -11-1 - n -- 1/*.3 ' -' 4.11-1.1- p I 1 --1=2W-* IllimlEEia:VE-fiEE -1&2 ~-r=~~-- =7 - -'-'"-:= |ag:==,-~-.:-,I,11 -1.-,56=.=lip, &~1 -- .11'Fr, 1 Mair=f ; il;Empi, Ilifff*iim=2822 3-46243R4~,.~.~1â€ž,4-.p-- ,----:---=- a=.6 - 375.</AL--1.- 5/-,AE.-7.0- r. ---â€¢- Nil==rig-7--/i. - 2 .. .I. n - al- :=am 1=1 f ile.1rlitu =i 11 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS LOT 22, SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 72 WEST OF THE 6th P.M., COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO . 1 . 1 15Â¥/ 13?111 2-Â£ \ .: 1 Â£ NTT .1-A . tall, UNIT 2-8 U - Â·. . O . 2 BED 4 rE .1 1 1 \ it \ d IT 1-1, 4% 1 UNIT 2-K 1BED J VEHICULAR l'BED *stvs UNI 2-H--UNI M - 1 BE IBE _ /0 2ECON-D-FLOOR.ELAN ~ 9 MIILII:EAMI.~X 1% 40 SPACES 14 1 .-i. ? \1.- 1 9 . PED. ENTRY BELOW fr 1, GABAGE-,I~EME-L--Â£122 \ 18 -'thIL MULTI-FAMILY C-,10 - 1. 1~~s *NT'BY Â« ~ ' UNIT HEIGHT TABLE -- Id~1 - 4Â£ 1 UNIT FINISHED ROOF RIDGE GRADE ELEV. LOWEST HIGHEST TOTAL ROOF ALLOWABLE UNIT 141 - C -, BP NUMBER FLOOR ELEV ELEV. @ ROOF RIDGE GRADE ELEV. GRADE ELEV. HEIGHT HEIGHT Al 7689.57 7719.12 7688.07 7687.24 7690.20 31.05 31.48 2-BED ... ---- 5 A2 7688.5 7716.09 7684.96 7684.07 7687.24 31.13 31.59 A3 7688.79 7711.45 7680.25 7679.23 7682.7 31.20 6~ ~-1 A4 7688.33 7712.22 7681.06 7680.12 7683.4 31.16 i \ A5 7690.42 7718.45 7687 7686.98 7690.66 31.45 7692.61 7722.71 7691.64 7690.66 7693.94 31.07 % A7 7695.55 7724.78 7693.39 7692.34 7696.16 31.39 A8 7694.35 7720.95 7689.54 7688.51 7692.34 31.41 441 4 14 Â·A10 7692.45 7715.6 7684.39 7683.46 7686.81 31.21 1 . . Ag 7691.15 7713.26 7682.05 7681.22 7684.57 31.21 0/ All 7694.90 7720.75 7689.21 7688.23 7692.27 31.54 Al 2 7696.17 7724.93 7693.44 7692.27 7696.55 31.49 A13 7695.57 7726.95 7695.45 7694.45 7698.49 31.5 .* 1.3 A15 7695.44 7726.27 7695.03 7694.09 7697.51 31.24 Al 4 7693.81 7722.9 7691.35 IICI ar- ,- 1561, 7690.34 7694.45 31.55 liSE A16 7705.50 7734.92 7703.39 7702.74 7706.57 31.53 UNIT 1-2 - -1]NIT I:Ir- ---UN 14 2 -- 1 BE 1 B D ----- 31.14 .. 81 7688.58 7712.08 7681.04 7680.02 7683.22 31.04 B2 7691.25 7713.46 7682.32 7681.39 7684.6 MULTI-FAMILY NORTH 7708 First Lvl.) 7738.79 7705.58 7704.13 7711.92 33.21 EXTERIOR PATI " souni 7696 Gara e 7731.66 7699.81 7699.05 7703.42 31.85 FIRST_FLOORPLAN DATE: REVISION: : PROJECT TlnE: MULTI-FAMILY PAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS ~ SOUTH SAINT VRAIN ADDITION SHEET TITLE: THE MULHERN GROUP, LTD, BUILDING FLOOR PLANS ARCHITECTUREÂ·PLANNINGÂ·INTERIORS 1730 BLAKE STREET SUITE 435 -- Datele UY -1L_ Am. DENVER COLORADO 80202 -- CUENTÂ· DRAWN BY - DATE JULY 25. 2007 06074 CHECKED Ir _LP__ SCALE _12Â£-2-1'4 1111 LOPTus DEVELOPMENT,INC. 303 297 3334 FAX 303 292 2601 ...........