The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2007-09-18= FLâ‚¬- coPY 5 Prepared: September 12,2007 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 18, 2007 &1:00_a.m._Study. Session, Rooms 201 and 202, Town fiall 1:30 p.m. Meeting, Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT Public comments regarding items not shown on today's agenda should not exceed three minutes. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated August 21, 2007 b. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-13, WAPITI CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS, Lot 22, South Saint Vrain Addition, 1041 S. St. Vrain Avenue, The Mulhern Group, Ltd./Applicant-Request by applicant to continue this item to Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting on October 16, 2007. c. REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 00-07C, MARY'S LAKE LODGE CONDOMINIUMS, Lot 3, Mary's Lake Subdivision, and Lots 3A and 3B of Mary's Lake Replat, 2625 Mary's Lake Road, Ram' s Horn Development Co./Applicant-Request to change two buildings on Lot 3A such that each shall contain six accommodations units rather than the formerly approved four dwelling units each. No change to the building footprint is proposed. The request is in compliance with density limits. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-10 and PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, THE TIMBERS OF ESTES, Lot 3, Schroder Subdivision, 1240 Big Thompson Avenue Applicant: Mark Theiss Request: Develop four triplexes and one stand-alone unit; condominiumize these units for a total of 13 condominium units Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-12, SNUGGLERS COVE, a Metes & Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on the YMCA of the Rockies campus, 2515 Tunnel Road Applicant: YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Request: Develop six single-family cabins and two reunion buildings on the YMCA of the Rockies campus Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 5. DEVELOMENT PLAN 07-14, DELLA TERRA, a Metes & Bounds property, 3501 Fall River Road Applicant: Della Terra, LLC Request: Discontinue RV/camping use and develop a 14-room bed-and-breakfast and 160- person wedding facility Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 6. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, DEER RIDGE SUBDIVISION, Amended Plat of Lots 3 & 4, Skoog Subdivision, 1825 & 1925 Homestead Lane Applicant: Paul M. & Katherine M. Kochevar and John A. Skoog Request: Divide two lots into four lots Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 7. PROPOSED BLOCK 10 AMENDMENTS TO ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Â§3.1.D, Required Times for Action and Inaction, Addition of proposed subsection 5, Extension of Times, regarding time frames for action on allland-use applications; Â§3.2, Standard Review Procedure, Addition of proposed subsection H, Alternative Review Procedure, regarding provision of optional alternative review procedure; and Â§4.3, Table 4-2, Amendment regarding required setbacks from interior drives in the RM-Multi-Family Residential zoning district 8. REPORTS 9. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Estes Valley Planning Commission The next scheduled meeting will be held Tuesday, October 16, 2007. There are currently five items on the agenda. You can view information about all current submittals, including next month's Planning Commission items, on our web page: www. estesnet.com/comdev/Cu rrentReq uests.aspx RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS E JAFT Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission August 21, 2007,1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Betty Hull; Commissioners Wendell Amos, Ike Eisenlauer, Bruce Grant, Joyce Kitchen, Doug Klink, and John Tucker Attending: Vice-Chair Eisenlauer; Commissioners Amos, Grant, Kitchen, Klink, and Tucker Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Town Board Liaison Homeier, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Chair Hull, Planner Chilcott Vice-Chair Eisenlauer called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence of the meeting. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission minutes dated July 17, 2007. b. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-10 and PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, The Timbers of Estes, Lot 3, Schroder Subdivision, Mark Theiss/Applicant-Request by planning staff for continuance to September 18, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting c. AMENDED PLAT, Lots 5 & 6, Division 7 of High Drive Heights, Denise R. Panthen/Applicant-Request to combine two lots into one lot It was moved and seconded (Klink/Amos) that the consent agenda be accepted, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. 3. SPECIAL REVIEW 07-03, Tract 19, Beaver Point Addition 2nd Filing, 701 Elm Road, Applicant: H&C Properties Planner Shirk summarized the staff report. This is a request to allow a "U-Haul" truck- rental operation, which is currently being operated under a temporary use permit, to continue at the I-1-/ndustria/-zoned property located at 701 Elm Road. The use is classified as Vehicle/Equipment Sales and Rentals and is allowed in the I-1 zoning district by special review. The applicant proposes to construct additional parking, drainage structures, and landscaping in a single phase (Phase 11) if demand for vehicle rentals increases beyond the current numbers allowed by the temporary use permit (four trucks and eight trailers). There will be a maximum of eleven trucks and seventeen trailers on the site at any one time. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 August 21, 2007 Planner Shirk briefly reviewed Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) sections as they apply to this application, specifically regarding outdoor display/sales and storage, vehicle/equipment sales and rentals, grading and site disturbance, landscaping and buffers, and exterior lighting. The proposal complies with applicable code sections with the exception of landscape buffering; the site plan will be revised to show the addition of three evergreen trees. This request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department, Town Attorney Greg White, and Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Pertinent and unresolved comments from the Public Works Department and Town Attorney White are included as recommended conditions of approval. Upper Thompson Sanitation District had expressed concern regarding the depth of coverage of the sewer line under the detention pond but a letter from UTSD was received by planning staff on August 20, 2007 stating there will be enough coverage to prevent freezing during cold weather. No comments were received from neighboring property owners. If the approved use is abandoned or discontinued for a period of one consecutive year or more, the approval shall automatically lapse and become null and void. The submitted plans comply with all applicable standards set forth in the EVDC and mitigate, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment. Planning staff recommends approval of this special review. Public Comment: Amy Plummer/Van Horn Engineering and Surveying was present to represent Neil & Maryann Casey/applicants. She stated the applicants are agreeable to the recommended conditions of approval. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Kitchen) to recommend approval of Special Review 07-03, Tract 19, Beaver Point Heights Addition 2nd Filing, to the Town Board of Trustees, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. Phase Il activity shall require a Development Agreement and form of guarantee (per EVDC Section 10.5.K.2) prior to issuance of a permit. 2. Phase 11 activity shall require the drive entry to be reconfigured to provide a 20-foot corner radii and curbing, the design of which shall be subject to review and approval of the Public Works Department. 3. The following note shall be placed on the development plan: "Vehicle storage shall be restricted to paved areas. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit prior to commencement of Phase 11 of the project." 4. AMENDED PLAT, Lot 46A of the Amended Plat of Tracts 42, 43, & 46, Fall River Addition, 505 Big Horn Drive, Applicant: Van Horn Engineering Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. This is a request to amend a platted building envelope to allow construction of an outdoor entertainment area and an entry staircase. It is also a request for a minor modification to the required 25-foot building setback to allow the addition of the new staircase/entry to the existing residence to be placed 17.5 feet from the property line. This property was part of an amended plat recorded in 2000; the building envelope was designated to keep development out of a mapped rockfall hazard area to the north and to maintain the minimum setback requirement along the eastern property line. Outdoor Entertainment Area: The applicant has submitted a new geologic report which indicates that expanding the building envelope to the north as shown in the submitted plans would not increase the potential rock fall hazard. The outdoor entertainment area L -AFT . I , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 August 21, 2007 would consist of a bar/grill, hot tub, and open fire pit. Fire Chief Scott Dorman has stated that open fire pits are allowed on private property, provided they meet a number of conditions. The property owner should familiarize himself with these conditions, which are delineated in the staff report. Based on the geologic report, planning staff finds that the amendment to the northern line of the building envelope will not be in violation of any code provision, nor would it negate the intent of the geologic hazard or setback regulations. Staff recommends approval of amending the northern portion of the building envelope. Minor Modification to Setback for Staircase: The applicant's statement of intent states there is currently no staircase leading to the front door, which is located on the upper-floor deck. However, a set of stairs has been built in this location to provide access for an interior remodeling project. The contractor, Westover Construction, has stated the stairs are temporary and will be removed upon completion of the project. Planning staff has reviewed the building plans submitted for the existing residence, which was built in 2002. The building plans show an exterior stairway that provides access to the upper main living level; the stairway shown on the original plans is code-compliant without the requested minor modification. Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) Section 3.7 authorizes the Planning Commission to grant minor modifications up to a maximum of 25% from building setback requirements, provided the Commission finds that such modification advances the goals and purposes of the code and either results in less visual impact or more effective environmental or open-space preservation, or relieves practical difficulties in developing a site. Planning staff believes the requested minor modification meets none of these requirements and recommends denial based on the following: â€¢ No advancement of the goals and purposes of the Estes Valley Development Code. â€¢ Would not result in less visual impact or more effective environmental or open- space preservation. â€¢ No practical difficulty exists. A compliant set of stairs could be built, per the original building plans. â€¢ The lot was finalized in 2000, after adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code. â€¢ The existing dwelling was built in 2002, while the 25-foot setback and building envelope were in place. Therefore, any potential hardship or practical difficulty is "self imposed." â€¢ The applicant purchased the property with the existing regulations in place. The amended plat request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of services. Comments were received from the Town of Estes Park Building Department, Fire Chief Scott Dorman, and Town Attorney Greg White. Three neighboring property owners contacted planning staff-two were in favor of the amended plat, the third questioned why the statement of intent stated there were no entry stairs when there are. Public Comment: Lonnie Sheldon/Van Horn Engineering and Surveying was present to represent the applicant. He clarified that the original geologic hazard report had been submitted by Michael West from Boulder; the new report was completed by TerraCon. He stated although the recently constructed stairway looks permanent it is only for use during the remodel. The applicant wishes to have a stone stairway built in that location. He cited sections of the development code to support the applicant's request and noted that the driveway leads to the proposed location for the stairway and that the neighboring residence is approximately 300 feet away. The applicant's residence was not built where planned-it was moved by twelve feet. He encouraged the Commissioners to help the applicant and allow him to build a nice set of stairs into his house. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 August 21, 2007 In response to questions from Commissioner Tucker, Planner Shirk stated no comment was received from the neighboring property owner to the east. The proposed stairway would not be in the direct line of sight of that neighbor. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Tucker) to recommend approval of the Amended Plat of Lot 46A of the Amended Plat of Tracts 42, 43, and 46, Fall River Addition to the Town Board of Trustees, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, with the exception that the minor modification shall be approved as shown in revised Condition #1 due to lack of comments received from neighbors or other parties, and the motion passed unanimously with one absent. CONDITIONS: 1. The approved Minor Modification to allow an eastern side-yard setback of 17.5 feet in lieu of the required 25 feet shall be restricted to the location of the proposed entry staircase and shall not extend the length of the eastern property line. 2. Compliance with Chief Dorman's comments dated July 2,2007 regarding outdoor fire pit requirements (as delineated in the staff report). 3. Reformat the plat for recording (remove improvements). 5. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-09, Stone Bridge Condominiums, Proposed Lots 2 & 3, Stone Bridge Estates Subdivision, currently a Metes and Bounds property located at 1043 Fish Creek Road, Applicant: Rock Castle Development Co., Owner: Van Horn Trust Planner Shirk provided an in-depth review of the staff report. This is a request to develop 4.3 acres zoned RM-Multi-Family Residential with twenty-four detached multi-family dwelling units, which is an allowed land use within the RM zoning district. The applicant intends to subdivide these units into condominium ownership. The applicant's property is in the process of being subdivided into three lots; proposed Lots 2 and 3 are included in this development plan proposal. The portion of the property on which the Van Horn Engineering office is located (proposed Lot 1) is not part of this development plan. The applicant has applied for rezoning of proposed Lot 1 from RM to 0-Office; this rezoning would match the use of the property and prohibit additional residential development on Lot 1. The preliminary subdivision plat and rezoning request were reviewed by the Planning Commission on January 16, 2007 and were recommended for approval. The Town Board is the decision-making body for the subdivision plat and rezoning request; planning staff anticipates both the preliminary and final plat applications, as well as the rezoning request, will be heard by the Town Board in late October. The applicant will also request an extension of the vesting period from 2010 to 2012. One recommended condition of approval of the preliminary plat application was that Larimer County grant a waiver to the required Fish Creek Road right-of-way width. The waiver to allow the applicant to maintain a sixty-foot right-of-way width on the west side of the road was conditionally approved by the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners on May 21, 2007. The development plan encompasses two lots. Each lot was reviewed individually for compliance with density, floor area ratio (FAR), parking, setback, landscaping, open space, and impervious coverage requirements. The proposal meets the density requirements of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC)-six units per acre are proposed (24 units on 3.989 net acres) and eight units per acre are allowed. Ten units are proposed for Lot 2; 11.4 are allowed. Fourteen units are proposed for Lot 3; 20.5 are allowed. The total number of proposed units on the two lots is twenty-four, where thirty- two are allowed. The applicant is not proposing to maximize density. The applicant has applied for a correction to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) floodplain maps. Completion of FEMA review is anticipated by mid- October. If the proposed corrected floodplain is approved by FEMA, it will not extend beyond the creek's main channel. Approval of this development plan must be contingent upon FEMA approval of the proposed map correction. ~DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 5 August 21, 2007 The maximum impervious coverage allowed in the RM zoning district is 50%. Proposed impervious coverage on Lot 2 is 42.3% and on Lot 3 is 37.3%, yielding an overall total impervious coverage of 39.1%. This proposal also complies with the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) in the RM district, which is 0.30. Proposed FAR for Lot 2 is 0.27; proposed FAR for Lot 3 is 0.22. Sidewalks will be provided to each unit. The applicant should provide a pedestrian trail from the proposed development to proposed bridge over Fish Creek and then on to the hike/bike path. The proposed development must meet wetlands and stream-corridor protection standards. The minimum setback from the stream (Fish Creek) is thirty feet; the locations of the proposed units meet this standard. The applicant has received a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers to remove a small, disconnected portion of wetlands. The applicant has provided a Wetland Creation Plan, which proposes significant riparian corridor enhancement through bank stabilization and wetland enhancement along Fish Creek, including replacement of the small area of wetlands to be removed. The applicant's landscape plan does not include specific district-buffer landscaping. However, the proposed "typical unit" landscaping shown in the architectural concept drawings accomplishes this objective. Provided each unit is so landscaped, the required quantity of plantings will be met. District buffer guidelines require evergreen plantings within twenty-five feet of the property line. The applicant has requested a modification to allow the plantings to be placed closer to the units, which will better screen the units and allow the placement of more appropriate riparian plantings beside Fish Creek. The applicant has met with the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) to determine a corridor for elk crossing through the property. Items such as retaining walls, building locations, and fencing have been designed to allow the passage of elk. The CDOW will need to approve the fence design to ensure it will not pose a hazard to wildlife. No dumpster is proposed for the units; instead, curbside pickup is proposed. Future condominium declarations should specify that trash should be kept inside until the morning of pickup. Exterior lighting will be subject to lighting standards in EVDC Section 7.9 and must be shielded, downcast, and no higher than fifteen feet above the ground. The Light and Power Department originally required that street lights be placed at each entry point onto Fish Creek Road but after discussion with planning staff, who conveyed neighborhood concerns about street lights in these locations, agreed to waive that requirement. The access points are considered driveway entrances rather than street intersections. The proposed development requires fifty-three parking spaces; sixty-six will be provided. Of these, forty-eight will be in garages and eighteen will be guest parking spaces. Units 1075, 1095, 1105, 1107, 1157, and 1185 do not have adequate driveway depth to accommodate parking outside the units' garages and parking at these units should be restricted to in-garage parking only. This restriction should be addressed with the condominium covenants and declarations. The proposal provides adequate guest parking near these units to accommodate visitors. Two small hammerhead turning areas are proposed for this development. On the afternoon of August 20, 2007, the Fire Chief requested that a thirty-foot-wide turnaround be provided for fire trucks; it may be possible to alter one of the proposed hammerheads to provide fire access to address this concern. Adequate public facilities are available to serve this development. The water main along Fish Creek Road will be extended. The existing sewer main is not deep enough and a new sewer main will be installed, which will run parallel to the existing main for a distance, although at a lower depth. A twenty-foot-wide easement will be provided for an existing private water line that crosses this property and serves homes on the east side of Fish Creek Road. The submitted ISO calculations indicate adequate fire flow is available; three new fire hydrants are proposed. iFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~ ' Estes Valley Planning Commission 6 August 21, 2007 Numerous concerns have been expressed by neighboring property owners. Most comments received were written between January and May and were directed toward the subdivision and right-of-way waiver requests. The overwhelming themes of these comments were concerns about traffic safety, density (multi-family development adjacent to single-family residences), preservation of wildlife habitat, and floodplain issues. Comments were received from Dale and Diane Beck, 1635 Powelly Lane; Raymond and Sally Allen, 820 Fish Creek Road; Matt and Ruby Lynett, 894 Fish Creek Road; Paula Edwards, 1020 Acacia Drive; John Poulos, 1805 Powelly Lane; Robert and Myla Bernhard and their son, Fred Bernhard, 1650 Powelly Lane; David Diggs and Mari Hirata, 1770 Powelly Lane; Karin Edwards, 1020 Acacia Drive; Enda Mills Kiley, 1901 Ptarmigan Trail; Kathleen Cannon and Henry Cannon, 1110 Fish Creek Road; Bob and Laura Trump, 830 Fish Creek Road; John and Patti Watson, 1740 Powelly Lane; Judith Saurino, 890 Fish Creek Road; William and Marguerite Paynter, 810 Fish Creek Road; and Fred Held, 1710 Powelly Lane. The Town and applicant are in the process of formalizing an agreement regarding the "Creek Enhancement and Wetland Creation Plan" submitted by the applicant. This agreement will outline Fish Creek restoration responsibilities, the proposed bridge, and associated easements. As part of this agreement, the applicant will do some work on Town property to provide bank stabilization. The agreement will be reviewed by the Town's Public Works Committee prior to final review by the Town Board. Planner Shirk read the nine staff findings and recommendation shown in the staff report. Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Stone Bridge Estates development plan 07-09. In response to questions from the Commissioners, Planner Shirk stated staff believes FEMA approval of the floodplain map correction is likely. EVDC Section 7.10 would allow the Planning Commission to require the applicant to provide bear-proof trash containers. The additional sidewalk and potential turn-around for emergency vehicle access would not push the impervious coverage on the site over the allowed limits. Public Comment: Frank Theis/CMS Planning and DevelopmenUConsultant for applicant Rock Castle Development stated project planning began over fifteen months ago. There have been many issues due to the creek, adjacent county road, and inside-town-limits status of the property. The applicant has tried to address concerns from the Town, County, opponents, and neighbors and provide a sensitive design. Darcy Tiglas, wetlands expert, provided a wetlands report. The applicant will stabilize the creek, revegetate banks, and recover wetlands. The traffic impact analysis found no detrimental safety issues. Recent expansion of County road right-of-way standards from sixty feet to 100 feet was aimed at flat lands where that right-of-way width is needed. The applicant has repeatedly offered to meet with neighboring property owners and hosted a meeting where only two neighbors came. Units have been designed to have a single-story profile at Fish Creek Road; all buildings have been pushed as far from the road as possible. An evergreen hedge is proposed along the road rather than a concrete wall like that found at the nearby Creekside Subdivision. There will be stone columns and a small section of fence, which will be designed for safety of elk, at the entrance. Decks of the units will be no closer than thirty feet to Fish Creek. The revised flood plain is within the existing banks of the creek. Landscape plantings will be four to five times what is required. The homeowners' association will maintain their side of Fish Creek after the restoration work and planting is completed; the Town will be responsible for maintenance of the creek where it runs on Town property. If the Town does not provide satisfactory maintenance, the homeowners' association will assume responsibility for repairs. Bill Van Horn/Van Horn Family Trust stated there have been concerns regarding the proposed changes to the floodplain. In 1950 Lily Lake flooded Fish Creek, depositing material that made the creek channel ill-defined. In the thirty years since the FEMA floodplain mapping was done in 1979, significant erosion has occurred and the location and depth of the stream has changed. The modification of the FEMA flood map is based DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 7 August 21, 2007 on analysis of changed conditions of the creek as they exist today. The proposed development requires that something be done about the continued erosion of the stream. John Spooner/Van Horn Engineering confirmed what Mr. Van Horn stated. The letter of map revision prepared by Mr. Spooner was sent to FEMA because conditions have changed. For instance, in a location where the existing flood map showed the stream channel at a depth of 0.5 feet, the channel is currently 5.5 feet deep. Beaver dams shown in the area no longer exist. FEMA does not rubber stamp map revisions; there is an extremely thorough review process. Mr. Spooner's credentials include a PhD in hydraulic engineering, teaching experience at Purdue University, and work as a trainer of consultants in flood-insurance evaluations. Randy Willard/Attorney representing Fish Creek Water Association raised opposition to the proposed development plan and urged the Commissioners to continue the application based on unresolved issues, including pending FEMA review of the floodplain adjustment and concerns regarding the right-of-way waiver granted by the Larimer County Commissioners. FEMA may not approve the flood map revision; their decision will not be made until October at the earliest. The potential for another 100-year flood still exists. The area around the proposed development was under water when the Lily Lake flood occurred in the 1950s. The decision to approve the right-of-way waiver has been appealed and is before a court for review. If FEMA denies the flood map revision, the proposed development would become moot. If the court decides the right-of-way waiver was granted in error, the sixty-foot right-of-way will be incorrect. Mr. Willard also contended the fifteen-foot setback from the front property line required by the EVDC has been applied incorrectly. In the case of a conflict between Larimer County standards and EVDC standards, County standards should prevail; therefore, the fifty-foot setback required by the County should apply to this development. Town Attorney White stated the fifteen-foot setback applies to this property because it is within Estes Park town limits. Construction is not allowed in the floodway but is allowed in the flood fringe if the habitable portion of a structure is two feet higher than the flood fringe. Planner Shirk confirmed that construction and/or grading on the site cannot begin until the subdivision plat is approved. Ken Czarnowski/Attorney representing Fish Creek Water Association stated the application for the revised flood map is in the ninety-day review period with FEMA; the public is allowed to comment and the Water Association will submit comments. He urged the Commissioners to table the application until the FEMA decision is made, as it will affect where structures may be located. A six-foot earthen embankment contains 100 acre-feet of water at Lily Lake, which could flood Fish Creek again. Director Joseph stated no building permit will be issued until FEMA approves the revised flood map; if the revision is not approved, the development plan (if approved) would never be fully enacted. Bob Trump/830 Fish Creek Road/President of Fish Creek Water Association stated all members of the Water Association are opposed to the condominium subdivision because it is completely out of character with the area. Neighboring properties are all larger parcels of land; property owned by the sixteen Water Association members totals approximately 200 acres. He read aloud his letter to the Planning Commission dated August 21, 2007 and submitted a copy for the record as well as a letter for the Planning Commission from Karin Edwards dated August 20, 2007. He expressed concern about high density of the proposed development, loss of uncluttered appearance of area, impact on visitors to area, increased traffic volume, difficulty obtaining information on the proposal and accuracy of that information, and bending rules for developers who propose tax-generating developments. He encouraged the Commissioners to vote to preserve the beauty of the valley for future generations. Fred Bernhard/1650 Powelly Lane expressed opposition to the proposed development and stated nothing is being done to preserve the valley. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 8 August 21, 2007 Town Attorney White stated the U.S. constitution provides that government shall not take private property rights without due process of law. An owner has the right to develop their property. The applicant's property was zoned as commercial in 1961 and downgraded to RM zoning in 2000. Zoning changes are decided upon by the Town Board or County Commissioners, not the Planning Commission. Director Joseph and Commissioner Amos referenced the adoption of the EVDC and valley-wide rezoning in 2000; if residents have concerns about development and/or wish to change zoning in the valley, the community must act together to request code changes-an individual parcel or project cannot be singled out. Jan Verschuur/Association for Responsible Development (ARD) spoke on behalf of himself, his wife, and ARD and stated he is not a neighboring property owner. The consensus of ARD is the proposed development is not a good project. He expressed concern about change in traffic patterns and danger to school children who use the Fish Creek corridor; high-density development of 23 units on 4.3 acres adjacent to hike/bike trail; impact on visual appeal of Fish Creek corridor; the development is not in keeping with surrounding properties; and impact on wildlife and the riparian nature of Fish Creek, which could be rehabilitated by the Town without a development of such great density. Frank Theis stated the applicant never received input from ARD and is proposing much less dense development than is allowed. The applicant offered to hook up Fish Creek Water Association to the new water main at no cost, which would have relieved the association of one-third of their infrastructure. The Water Association chose to retain their line and use their position to delay the development. Only two homes on the opposite side of Fish Creek Road will have a direct view of the development. Enhancement of the riparian corridor along Fish Creek will bring elk back to the area. Bill Van Horn stated there will be a different FEMA map because the erroneous map in place now will not continue to be used. There is no risk to the public if the development plan is approved because no permits can be issued until conditions of approval are met. The applicant has allowed enough room from the floodplain that the development plan won't be changed. The lawsuit was filed against the County, and any legal request for project delay should be heard by the District court. The Planning Commission has no grounds to delay the application. Planner Shirk stated no units are proposed to be located in the existing floodway. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Kitchen) to approve Development Plan 07-09, Stone Bridge Condominiums, a Metes and Bounds property located in Portions of Northeast Section 31, Northwest Section 32, and Southwest Section 29, T5N, R72W of the 6~h P.M., with the findings and conditions recommended by staff with Condition #13 to state "...application for first building permit" rather than "...issuance of first building permit," and the motion passed unanimously with one absent CONDITIONS: 1. Approval and recordation of Stone Bridge subdivision. 2. Approval of this development plan shall be contingent upon FEMA approval of the proposed map correction. 3. Access and right-of-way permits from Larimer County shall be required prior to issuance of the first building permit for each lot. 4. Final construction plans shall be approved by the Town of Estes Park, UTSD, and Larimer County Engineering prior to issuance of the grading permit and/or first building permit. 5. Full implementation of the "Creek Enhancement and Wetland Creation Plan for the Stone Bridge Property (Tiglas Feb. 2007)." Final version of this plan shall be subject to review and approval of Town staff and shall include details regarding specific plant species and location. 6. A registered land surveyor shall provide a stamped certificate verifying location and height for each structure. The form of this certificate shall be determined by the Chief Building Official or designee. L. f_-iFT =11 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 9 August 21, 2007 7. Each unit shall be landscaped in accordance with the typical unit landscaping delineated in the staff report. Staff shall be authorized to grant minor changes to unit landscaping in terms of plant type to encourage species mix. 8. Compliance with memo from Upper Thompson Sanitation District dated June 21, 2007, regarding this project. 9. Compliance with memo from Larimer County Engineering dated August 8, 2007, regarding this project. 10. Neither the Town of Estes Park or the Estes Valley Recreation and Park District shall be liable for any damage or risk associated with the golf course. Future condo- miniumization shall require the standard waiver of liability for errant golf balls be included in the condominium declarations. 11. Future condominium declarations shall include provisions to keep trash inside until the morning of pick up and shall prohibit parking in front of units 1075, 1095, 1105, 1107, 1157, and 1185. 12.The Division of Wildlife shall approve the fence design prior to construction of such fence. 13. A development agreement between the Developer and the Town regarding "Creek Enhancement and Wetland Creation Plan" shall be finalized prior to application for first building permit. 14. Streetlights shall be removed from plan. 15.The following note shall be placed on the development plan: "Any future expansion or change of use of the Van Horn Engineering office building (1043 Fish Creek Road) shall require construction of a parking lot that satisfies requirements of the Estes Valley Development Code, and shall require removal of and revegetation of the existing parking area located on the east side of Fish Creek Road." 16. A pedestrian trail shall be designed from the Fish Creek trail to serve both lots of this proposal. Design shall be subject to review and approval of staff. 17. Man-made slopes exceeding 25% shall be graphically delineated on the plan, and specific reseeding plans noted (i.e., vegetation, erosion control mats). 18. A note shall be placed on the development plan stating "This site is within an identified wildlife habitat. All development shall comply with Wildlife Protection Standards outlined in the Estes Valley Development Code. This includes future buildings and/or fences." 19. A "hammerhead" shall be designed for Units 1125 and 1117 and shall be marked with a "no parking" sign. The "hammerhead" turn-around near units 1067 and 1075 shall be marked with a "no parking" sign. 20.The required landscaping shall be graphically delineated in the landscaping legend. 6. PROPOSED BLOCK 10 AMENDMENTS TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE This is a request to make additions and a correction to the Estes Valley Development Code. The complete text of the proposed changes was provided to the Planning Commissioners via a staff report. Section 3.1.D, Required Times for Action and Inaction, addition of proposed subsection 5, Extension of Times, regarding timeframes for action on all land- use applications Director Joseph stated this proposed addition to the EVDC provides procedural steps for land-use approvals of all types. Item D.5 allows the Community Development Director some discretion to extend the period of time necessary for the department to review land-use proposals. Any extension would be provided in writing and posted in the Community Development office and on the Town website. Staff received the suggestion that the timeframe not be open-ended. An additional sixty days would provide an adequate time extension under all but the most extreme circumstances. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 10 August 21, 2007 Section 3.2, Standard Review Procedure, addition of proposed subsection H, Alternative Review Procedure, regarding provision of optional alternative review procedure The planning department processes submittals as they come in; sometimes there are very intense periods of activity. There is nothing to prevent the department from receiving so many properly prepared and complete submittals that the work cannot be processed with the in-house workforce. This proposed addition to the EVDC gives applicants a choice of waiting until the peak in the workload has passed or choosing an outside consultant to process the plan review from a list of consultants approved by the Community Development Department. If the applicant chose to use an outside consultant, the applicant would be responsible for payment of all fees charged by the consultant for the review. Staff does not anticipate using this code provision routinely but believes it prudent to codify this option in the event there is an extended illness or other prolonged absence of planners in the office or if faced with so much activity that the staff can't process the entire workload in the timeframes mandated by the EVDC. Commissioner Tucker requested staff identify a trigger or threshold for application of the proposed additions. Sect\on 4.3, Table 4-2, Base Density and Dimensional Standards, Residential Zoning Districts, regarding required setbacks from interior drives in the RM- Multi-Family Residential zoning district This proposed change was not discussed at today's meeting. It was moved and seconded (Tucker/Amos) to continue discussion of the proposed amendments to Section 3.1.D, 3.2, and 4.3, Table 4-2 of the Estes Valley Development Code to the September 18, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting, and the motion passed unanimously with oneabsent. 7. REPORTS None. General discussion between Commissioners and staff followed regarding their concerns about the public's misconceptions about their role and decision-making authority in reviewing proposed developments. The Commissioners make every effort to be fair and reasonable in enforcing the development code. Also discussed was the ways in which the public could influence future development in the Estes Valley. It is difficult to get public involvement unless there is a proposal that directly affects neighboring property owners. Two unidentified members of the audience questioned whether Development Plan 07-10 and the Preliminary Condominium Map for The Timbers of Estes would be reviewed at today's meeting. Director Joseph stated the items had been continued to the September 18, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting as part of the action on the consent agenda at the start of the meeting. He encouraged them to contact planning staff with their questions or comments and/or attend the September Planning Commission meeting. There being no further business, Vice-Chair Eisenlauer adjourned the meeting at 4:20 P.m. Richard "Ike" Eisenlauer, Vice-Chair Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary DRA-FT MEMORANDUM ESTES PARK SURVEyORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 Telephone 970-586-5175 Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX received at 970-586-5816 FROM: Paul Kochevar DATE: September 18, 2007 TO: Dave Shirk at Town of Estes Park SUBJECT: Deer Ridge Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Modifications The Public Works memo of August 31 indicates: 1. we need to meet the local mountain criteria and 2. provide a turn around at the end of the drive and 3. extend the drive to Lot 4 All of the above mentioned items were discussed when the subdivision was originally approved in 2006 by the Planning Commission and the Town Board. That discussion focused upon the inordinate expense and practicality of providing these design elements in this situation and on this site. When you get to the west end of this drive you are up against a much steeper slope and a drainage that confines the drive on it's north side. Both elements limit the construction of an improved drive to the manner we have presented. The proposed drive is a much better situation than now exists. It is very safe and provides access in a manner that far exceeds anything in the neighborhood. The original approval of this subdivision accounted for these and other factors including the down zoning from multi-family to estate lot sizes. It is an extraordinary imposition to ask us to eliminate one lot in order to provide minimal improvement to the drive design already presented. The elimination of a lot is the only way we could meet this criteria. It has taken us over a year to save enough to build the drive as originally approved. An arbitrary change at this point, with such financial implications, would be devastating. Thank you for your consideration. Please let me know if moving forward as presented is a possibility. Paul Kochevar " PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3 BOARD OF EDUCATION LINDA CHAPMAN LARRY PESSES, President 1605 BRODIE AVENUE Superintendent TODD JIRSA, Vice-President ESTES PARK, COLORADO, 80517 MEREDITH SLOAN, Secretary TELEPHONE (970) 586-2361 SHIRLEY HOLT MICHAEL MILLER, Treasurer FAX: (970) 586-1108 Director of Business Services BECKY JOHNSON, Director www. estesschools.ora July 15, 2007 Mr. Bob Joseph, Director of Community Development Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Joseph: Thank you for your recent inquiry as to the status of our response to the Planning Commission's Findings and Recommendations concerning the construction project currently under way at the Park School District R-3. Attached you will find various documents from RLH Engineering, The Neenan Company, Tony Paglia of Park R-3, and Interwest Consulting Group, all of which will constitute a thorough response to your questions and concerns. Please do not hesitate to contact me if further information or clarification is needed. We appreciate the opportunity to partner with the Town of Estes Park to ensure that our students and their families have access to an excellent educational experience. Sincerely, 11 CLyâ€ž~ Linda Chapman liD) ~:) f JUL 1 6 200I ~ ~ j , H - ROBIN WEIDEMUELLER BRAD SCHULTZ KAREN GLASSMAN TONY PAGLIA RANDY HINSON Instructional Services Student Services Federal Programs Auxiliary Services Athletics/Activities 0 CÂ»i Facility Planning, Engineering, & Environmental Services July 10, 2007 Plf JUL 1 6 2001 it U Ms. Linda Chapman, Superintendent & Park School District R-3 1605 Brodie Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517-5416 SUBJECT: Estes Valley Planning Commission - response to May 9,2007 Letter. Dear Linda, The purpose of this letter is to respond in writing to the May 9,2007 letter sent from the Estes Valley Planning Commission. The Planning Commission adopted the Estes Park Community Development Department staff findings and recommendations from the report for development plan # 07-06. The Planning Commission respectfully requested that the Board of Education provide written responses regarding the staff recommendations to the Estes Valley Planning Commission. The Park School District Redevelopment Development Plan #07-05, prepared by the Estes Park Community Development Department, page 7 Section V - Staff Findings and Recommendations. Listed below is written responses to each of the recommendations: 1. Items 1 - 3: No Response is requested. 2. Item 4 - Site Planning: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007, and refer to the attached site plan drawings. 3. Item 5 - Site Disturbance/Drainage: Refer to attached proposa/ from /nterwest Consu/ting Group for the fee associated with a storm water drainage plan and report, dated June 29, 2007. 4. Item 6 - Vacation of Right-of-Way: Refer to attached letter from Park School District's Owner's Representative requesting vacation of Right-of-Way, dated June 8, 2007. 5. Item 7 - Construction in Right-of-Way: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007. 6. Item 8 - Driveway Access to Town Streets: Refer to attached /etter from The Neenan Company dated June 26,2007, refer to attached proposal from Interwest Consulting Group for the fee associated with a traffic impact analysis dated June 29, 2007, and refer to letter from Park School District's Director of Auxiliary Services dated June 29,2007. 7. item 9 - Sidewalk Refer to letter from Park School District's Director of Auxiliary Services dated June 29, 2007. 8. Item 10- Utilities: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26,2007. 9. Item 11 - Fire Protection: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007. 541 East Garden Drive, Unit S M Windsor, Colorado 80550 1 (970) 686-5695 / Fax (970) 686-5696 Estes Valley Planning Commission July 10, 2007 Page 2 of 2 10. Item 12 - Use and Density and Dimensional Standards: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007. 11. Item 13- Tree and Vegetation Protection: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007. 12. Item 14 - Landscaping: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007, and refer to the attached landscape drawings. 13. Item 15- Exterior Lighting: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26,2007. 14. Item 16 - Parking: Refer to attached letter from The Neenan Company dated June 26, 2007 Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding any of the items listed above. Sincerell, Travis B. Guerette Senior Project Manager , 121*W,4 archistructione E. ' ' www.neenan.com June 26,2007 pÂ© E D 917 r.=31 Linda Chapman, Superintendant of Schools ~1 JUL 1 6 2007 1\ 9 i Park School District RE-3 i ~ j l,59 f 1605 Brodie Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 4 ' Dear Ms. Chapman, I received a copy of the Town of Estes Park's report as a response to the development plan submittal for the . improvements to the schools and site dated May 9,2007. Following are responses to some of the questions 4 and concerns that were brought up in the report. . i 1) As a clarification to the report, on page #2, it states that "the Proposed Facility Improvements and Capital Construction Projects report also proposed middle school improvements, including 7 4 12,050 square feet of new construction at the middle school and 24,430 square feet of major renovations." This information is incorrect- there are 15,360 square feet of major renovation and ~ 38,670 square feet of minor finish upgrades proposed at the middle school. There is currently no new construction in the scope for the middle school. i t , 2) Regarding item #V.4 on page #7, updated site plans and Civil Drawings (100% complete Construction Documents) for the New Elementary School, High School, and Bus Loop are enclosed for your use. 3) Regarding item #V.7 on page #8, The Neenan Company has received written approval from Greg ..h Sievers, Town of Estes Public Works Engineering, to proceed with the accessible parking spaces along Manford Avenue. No permit is required per Mr. Sievers for this Work, i 4) Regarding item #V.8 on page #8, there is a proposed bus loop that will serve all schools, located 1 just west of the Middle School. This will provide a central drop-off and pick-up location for all buses entering the campus for added safety of the students & reduced traffic congestion. The center of the bus loop contains thirty-nine parking spaces that are designated staff parking for the New Elementary School. Therefore, the additional vehicles entering and exiting this new parking j area will be doing so at different times than the peak parent and bus traffic. 5) Regarding item #V. 10 on page #10, a 'Fire Sprinkler System Connection Application' has been sent to the Estes Par k Water Department along with the required information for both the Elementary School and the High School. Information will be submitted for the Middle School once the design has been completed. 6) Regarding item #V.10 on page #10, plumbing drawings for the New Elementary School were sent to Reed Smedly on 04/11/07. It has been verified by the plumbing engineer that the existing grease interceptor at the New Elementary School is adequately sized for the additional occupant load to the school. If the district decides to serve lunch out of the Middle School again (the existing Middle School Kitchen is currently not being used), multiple upgrades will be made to the kitchen including adding a grease interceptor. The existing Elementary School will no longer be utilized by the district and no upgrades or addition of a new grease interceptor is proposed for this building. 7) Regarding item #V. 11 on page #10, all correspondence with the fire department has been documented and forwarded to RLH. A fire sprinkler system will also be provided at the Middle School. As the city has noted, there were inconsistencies and inaccurate information in the survey information provided by Cornerstone Engineering. To help resolve this, at completion of the project, The Neenan Company will provide record drawings showing the locations of new and relocated utilities. In addition, some of the proposed improvements were not yet shown on the overall water plan, as they are in future phases and the final plans have not been developed. That information will show up on the final record drawings. 2620 E. Prospect Road, Suite 100 I Fort Collins, CO 80525 I 970.493.8747 I Fax: 970.493.5869 UOn 0494004% 0,44* I y archistructione I . www.neena#con, 8) Regarding item #V. 12 on page #11, based on the survey by Cornerstone Engineering, the High School Addition is located 4'-5" from the property line at its closest point. The height of thdlligh School Additions is 28'-0" maximum and does not exceed the existing school's height. 9) Regarding item #V.13 on page #11, all efforts are being made to save existing trees. Some \Â·" vegetation at the entry of the High School is being removed to provide a safe and secure environment for students and staff. 10) Regarding item #V.14 on page #11, 100% complete Landscape Plans for the High School and 1, .1 New Elementary School are attached for your use. 11) Regarding item #V. 15 on page #11, all new exterior lighting will be shielded, downcast lighting. In addition, we are replacing the (8) existing non-complying exterior wall packs at the New 4 Elementary School with complying fixtures, 44 12) Regarding item #V.16 on page #11, see response numbers 2) and 3) above. 1 a ' 4 Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns regarding any of these items. Sincerely, Â¥ ri Heidi Shuff ; i Architect CC: Richard Huwa, RLH Engineering ; Enc. 2620 E. Prospect Road, Suite 100 I Fort Collins, CO 80525 1 970.493.8747 1 Fax: 970.493.5869 <~ uotion4stioo , uli PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3 BOARD OF EDUCATION LINDA CHAPMAN LARRY PESSES, President 1605 BRODIE AVENUE Superintendent TODD JIRSA, Vice-President ESTES PARK, COLORADO, 80517 MEREDITH SLOAN, Secretary TELEPHONE (970) 586-2361 SHIRLEY HOLT MICHAEL MILLER, Treasurer FAX: (970) 586-1108 Director of Business Services BECKY JOHNSON, Director www.estesschools.orq June 8,2007 Mr. Greg Sievers Public Works Engineering Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Subject: Park School District R-3 Request for Vacation of Right-of Way near Estes Park High School. Dear Mr. Sievers, The Park School District R-3 is requesting vacation of rights-of-way as shown on the attached drawing. There are two areas of vacation being requested by the School District. The first area is a portion of the 60' wide ROW on Manford Drive, approximately 200' long and east of the eastern driveway access to the high school parking lot. Our request is to vacate this right of way and make it a contiguous part of School District property, with maintenance of the existing road and other improvements becoming the responsibility of the School District. The second area is adjacent to and north of the first area. It is a 60' wide ROW, approximately 600' in length and adjacent to and west of the high school staff parking lot and grass playfields which make up the northeast portion of School District property. Our surveys have shown this ROW to be part of the School District property, but we understand there is a question as to the original ownership of this ROW prior to the ROW being dedicated. Our request is to vacate this right of way and make it a contiguous part of School District property, with maintenance of the area becoming the responsibility of the School District. If you have any questions about our request, please contact Tony Paglia or the undersigned. Sincerely, *L f AL -@ImÂ©IMOV [5-41 Richard L. Huwa Owner's Representative for Park R-3 School District 131 JUL 16 2007 U ~ Attachment: Site Drawing L j 1 / ,1 1 . CC: Tony Paglia L.- Linda Chapman rowvacationrequest.6078 ROBIN WEIDEMUELLER BRAD SCHULTZ KAREN GLASSMAN TONY PAGLIA RANDY HINSON Instructional Services Student Services Federal Programs Auxiliary Services Athletics/Activities , PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3 BOARD OF EDUCATION LINDA CHAPMAN LARRY PESSES, President 1605 BRODIE AVENUE Superintendent TODD JIRSA, Vice-President ESTES PARK, COLORADO, 80517 MEREDITH SLOAN, Secretary TELEPHONE (970) 586-2361 SHIRLEY HOLT MICHAEL MILLER, Treasurer FAX: (970) 586-1108 Director of Business Services BECKY JOHNSON, Director www.estesschools.org June 29,2007 Planning Commission 1~h\~ JUL 1 6 2007 7 ] Town of Estes Park L,f ~ P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 il- Dear Planning Commission, Thank you for taking the time to review the school district remodel and additions to the current buildings. We would like to respond to a few of the concerns that neither RLH nor the Neenan Company has responded to. The Town must realize that many of the comments that were made by the planning teams and planning commission were not included in our bond and the money is not readily available at this time. With the help of the Estes Park Police Department last spring, we were able to alleviate a lot of the backup on Brodie Avenue during drop-offs in the mornings. We realize that combining the two schools into one would increase traffic. Please remember that a lot of parents have students in both the elementary school and intermediate school, therefore they would drop off at one school and drive to the other. Having both schools in one building should eliminate some traffic. The district is installing a new drop-off lane in front of the new elementary school that will exit out to Community Drive. The intention of this new lane is to handle the added traffic and make it easier for parents and students attending school. As for the westernmost access from the school to Brodie Avenue, we are curious as to why the Town would want this road closed. It is there to make drop-off traffic flow faster and exit sooner. Without this exit, we believe that the traffic backup on Brodie would be much greater. The district is not opposed to widening and installing a turn lane on Brodie Avenue, but we do not believe the total cost of such construction should fall directly on the district. After all, we have quite a few town homes and a church on the south side of Brodie Avenue that use this street. The district is looking into the cost of a traffic study and will continue to work with the Town if traffic flow is indeed a problem in the future. We are continually working on pedestrian connections, i.e. the new bus loop with parking and sidewalks to the old elementary school, the new elementary school and the middle school. We know that we need more and will continue to work on this situation. As for a connection to the Fish Creek Trail, the school district looked at adding a walk to the trail when it was being built. We felt, for the safety of our students, that it was not the right thing to do. We did not want the general public to think they could have access to our buildings from this trail, and we did ROBIN WEIDEMUELLER BRAD SCHULTZ KAREN GLASSMAN TONY PAGLIA RANDY HINSON Instructional Services Student Services Federal Programs Auxiliary Services Athletics/Activities 4 not want students trying to enter the building from the east side where there was no supervision. The east doors remain locked to keep the public and students from entering. The entrances to the bus loop on both Community Drive and Manford Avenue, we feel, are both needed to alleviate traffic flow. Half of our buses come from each direction. If we were to eliminate one or the other we believe it would cause more traffic back up at the intersection of Manford and Community. Example: If we were to eliminate the entrance on Manford Avenue, the bus would have to go to the intersection heading west on Manford to Community. After stopping at the four-way stop they would have to turn left on Community and then turn left again just after the intersection and try to cross in front of the northbound traffic on Community. The district would like to wait and see if there are problems before addressing something that may be very expensive and not be helpful. Sincerely, Tony Paglia Director of Auxiliary Services INTERWEST ~CONSULTING GROUP June 29,2007 Park School District R-3 c/o Travis Guerette RLH Engineering 541 E. Garden Drive, #S Windsor, CO 80550 RE: Estes Park School District Improvements Agreement for Professional Engineering Services Travis, We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional engineering services for the proposed Estes Park School District Improvements. The scopes outlined herein are intended to address the comments/recommendations from the City of Estes Park relative to the traffic and drainage impacts. Included is a detailed scope that sets forth the services being provided as a part of this agreement for professional services and a fee estimate based on our standard hourly rates. Please call me at (970) 674-3300 ext. 106 should you have any questions. Thank you again for the opportunity to assist you on this project. Yours truly, ,;440 Â£12 Robert Almirall, P.E. 1 1 1 i t!, ' 1 Ju l. 1 6 2007 1 i /1 1218 WEST ASH, SUITE C â€¢ WINDSOR, COlORADO 80550 TEL. 970.674.3300 â€¢ FAX. 970.674,3303 Estes Park School Improvements June 29,2007 Page 2 of6 Proiect Location and Descriptions The Estes Park schools are located on the north side of Brodie Avenue, just west of Fish Creek Road in the City ofEstes Park, County of Larimer, Colorado. Detailed Scope of Services I. Traffic Impact Analysis - Matt Delich Engineering will prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis for the campus that reflects the existing traffic generation (based on information provided by the District and field traffic counts) and the anticipated impacts from the various proposed school additions. The basis for the study will be traffic counts taken no earlier than September in order to accurately reflect the traffic conditions associated with the school use. This analysis will make recommendations relative to the safety and function of the adjacent public roadways including access control alternatives and roadway improvements. Fee: $5,000 II. Stormwater Drainage Plan and Report - Interwest Consulting Group will prepare a Drainage Plan and R6port for the campus which will identify and depict on-site drainage patterns, drainage basin delineations, storm sewer locations, and existing outfall conditions. It is assumed that the existing campus improvements are "grandfathered" and do not require mitigation. Therefore, the mitigation measures identified will be based upon the increased impervious areas proposed with the new school, site and parking lot additions. Recommendations and designs will be provided relative to the feasibility.of providing on-site detention (flow rate reductions), water quality measures (BMP's) and site erosion/sediment controls. At this time it is not clear if the recommendations/designs will comply fully with Town of Estes Park design standards/criteria, or if onsite and offsite constraints will limit the extent of the improvements. This analysis is intended to mitigate the increased runoff and construction activities to the extent feasible without significant adverse impacts to the campus. The fee range below reflects the uncertainty associated with the design alternatives that may be selected. Fee: $8,000 - $10,000 The fees above will not be exceeded without a signed addendum by,the client. Additional services required for items excluded or not specifically listed above will be billed in accordance with the attached hourly rate schedule or as an addendum to this contract. Proposal 06030 A Estes Park School Improvements June 29,2007 Page 3 of6 Reimbursable expenses such as reproduction, travel mileage and delivery costs are billed in accordance with the attached rate schedule. In developing this proposal, several assumptions were made: 1. The existing downstream storm sewers and receiving channels are adequate and will provide the necessary storm water outfall for the site. 2. An adequate topographic design survey is available for the areas in which a storm drhinage facility may be proposed. SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following special conditions are applicable to this Agreement and are hereby made a part thereof by reference. General Terms: This proposed Agreement for Professional Services is valid for a period of 90 days from the date of the proposed agreement unless extended by mutual agreement This Agreement has been prepared based on the available data and information provided by the client and other sources as of the date of this Agreement. The scope of services and the corresponding level of service set forth in the budget to complete the scope of services are based on this information. Services not specifically set forth in the scope ofservices are hereby specifically excluded from this Agreement and will only be provided upon mutual agreement by the parties to this Agreement. Should changes to the scope of services be initiated by the client or necessitated by others beyond the control of Interwest Consulting Group Inc., subsequent to the date of the execution of this Agreement, it is agreed that the scope of services and the level of service set forth in the budget shall be modified to reflect these changes as mutually agreed upon by the parties'to tbis Agreement. All changes to the budget will be provided based on the cultent Professional Service Rates in use at that time. Interwest Consulting Group Inc. agrees to provide the client with updates to the Professional Service a Rates as they are adopted. In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of this project to both the client and Interwest Consulting Group Inc., these risks have been allocated such that the client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to specific limits of liability. The aggregate limits of liability of Interwest Consulting Group Inc., its consultants, and subconsultants on the project shall apply to any and all claims, losses, costs, or damages whatsoever arising froms resulting from, or in any way related to the project*from any and all cause or causes. The total aggregate liability of Interwest Consulting Group Inc., their consultants, and subconsultants to the.client owner and anyone claiming by, through or under the client or owner shall not exceed $250,000. It is intended that this limitation apply to any and allliability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless prohibited by law. Invoicing: All invoices are considered to be due and payable upon receipt unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement. It is mutually agreed that payment to Interwest Consulting Group Inc. shall not be delayed for Proposal 06030 Estes Park School Improvements June 29,2007 Page 4 of6 any reason during the execution of the scope of services. This would also include final payment upon completion ofthe scope of services by Interwest Consulting Group Inc. Withholding ofpayment shall only be for cause and shall be as set forth in writing by the client within 10 calendar days of receipt of the invoice. Invoices not contested within 10 calendar days are assumed to be accurate and acceptable to all parties, and all rights to withhold payment shall be forfeited after that time. Each invoice will represent services completed during the prior month unless otherwise noted on the invoice. Payment not received within 30 days ofthe invoice date will be considered past due. All past due invoices will be subject to a 1.5 % per month late charge. If the invoice, including late charges due, is not paid in full within 60 days of the invoice date, Interwest Consulting Group Inc. may cease all services on the project and may commence the exercising of its legal remedies. These include, but are not limited to, mechanics' lien rights under applicable law. In addition, this Agreement shall authorize Interwest Consulting Group Inc. to collect any fees incurred, including reasonable attorney's fees related to the collection ofpast due amounts from the client. Payment under this agreement is not contingent upon: 1) the client being reimbuised by any third party; 2) upon the client obtaining financing: or 3) completion ofthe overall project. Information Provided bv Others: All data and information provided to Interwest Consulting Group Inc. through the client will be assumed to be complete and accurate unless otherwise informed by the client. Interwest Consulting Group Inc. will endeavor to identify obvious errors and bring them to the attention of the client; however, Interwest Consulting Group Inc. cannot be responsible for the work of others unless the client has authorized an independent analysis of the data and information provided. Opinions of Probable Construction Costs: It is understood that Interwest Consulting Group Inc. has no control over costs of materials, the price of labor and equipment or the contractor's method ofpricing. Therefore, if requested by the client, Interwest Consulting Group Inc. will provide opinions of probable construction costs based on our experience and other available cost estimates of similar projects. Interwest Consulting Group Inc. makes no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs. Conflict Resolution: The client and Interwest Consulting Group Inc., agree that all disputes shall be discussed for immediate resolution between the individuals involved. Disputes shall include unsettled claims, counterclaims, disputes, and other matters in question arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereoÂ£ All disputes.shall be brought to the attention of the other party within a reasonable time period after the dispute has arisen. Prior to construction, conflict resolution may involve the project manager for Interwest Consulting Group Inc. and the project manager or representative of the client. Subsequent to the initiation of construction, dispute resolution shall be discussed initially with the field personnel involved. Should these parties fail to resolve the conflict, then the dispute shall be raised to the next level of management within the structure of each party. Should these efforts fail to resolve the dispute, then the parties hereto agree to settle the dispute through mediation. This process will involve the selection of a mediator, If the parties cannot agree on the selection of a single mediator, each party to the dispute will select one mediator and the two mediators selected individually shall select a third mediator. All costs involved in this process shall be borne by each party equally. Proposal 06030 Estes Park School Improvements June 29,2007 Page 5 of6 Disputes arising that involve the work of a contractor, subcontractor, or consultant to either the client or Interwest Consulting Group Inc. (joinable party), then either the client or Interwest Consulting Group Inc. may join each joinable party as a party to the mediation. This can only occur if speciically set forth in the fully executed Agreement and is also included in the individual contracts with each joinable party of the client and Interwest Consulting Group Inc. Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing seven (7) days written notice in the event of a substantial failure by one party through no fault of the other party to perfoxm in accordance with the terms and conditions ofthis agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by fifteen (15) days written notice. Should termination be initiated by client through no fault of Interwest Consulting Group Inc., then Interwest Consulting Group Inc. will be compensated in full for all services provided through the date of termination and all deliverables will be turned over to the client upon full payment. Assignment: Neither party to this Agreement shall transfer, sublet, or assign any rights under or interest in the Agreement (including but not limited to monies that are due or monies that may be due) without the prior written consent of the other party. Interwest Consulting Group Inc. is NOT an Aeent of the Client: Interwest Consulting Group Inc. is not authorized to act as the client's agent and shall have no authority, express or implied to act for or bind the client hereunder, either in relations with others involved with the project or in any other manner whatsoever except as may be specifically set forth herein. Validity: The validity, interpretation, construction and effect of this agreement shall be in accordance with and be governed by the laws of the state of Colorado. In the event any provision hereof shall be determined to be unenforceable or invalid, the remaining provisiom of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement, including all exhibits and attachments, has been fully executed - on behalf of the Interwest Consulting Group Inc. by its duly authorized officers, and the CLIENT has caused the same to be executed in its name and in its behalf by its duly authorized officers as of the date indicated below. Client: Interwest Consulting Group Inc.: By: re. Â· Tium la. Agb# M,"61" Date Signed: Date Signed: 6<1.4 01 Proposal 06030 Estes Park School Improvements June 29,2007 Page 6 of6 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE RATES 2007 PERSONNEL HOURLY RATE Principal $120 Sr. Project Manager $110 Project Manager $98 Sr. Project Engineer $88 Project Engineer $83 Design Engineer $75 CAD Technician $60 Clerical $45 DIRECT EXPENSES Mileage $0.55/mile Copies (8 M" X 11") $0.18/copy Ptints (24" X 36") $2.00/sheet . Mylar Sepia (24" X 36") $13.00/sheet Vellum (24" x 363 $7.00/sheet Unless otherwise stated in the Agreement for Professional Services, reimbursable expenses such as outside reproduction, deliveries, sub-consultant fees, and travel costs are in addition to the base contract fees and are charged as listed above or at cost plus fifteen percent. These Professional Service Rates are considered Confidential and shall not be released to a third party without written permission of Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. Rates are subject to change. Proposal 06030 - - - .THEMULHERN GROUP, LTD. ARCHITECTURE â€¢ PLANNING â€¢ INTERIORS September 05,2007 Estes Park Planning Commission 170 Macgregor Avenue PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 ATTN: Members of the Planning Commission RE: 'Wapiti Crossings Condominiums' - Public hearing - Request for continuance Project #: 06074 Dear Chairperson and the Members ofthe Commission: As the Architect / Agent of the owner and developer - Loftus Developments, we would like to request a continuance of the Planning Commission Public hearing scheduled for the aforementioned project on the 18th of September, 2007. We had a preliminary meeting with City Staff on our application / proposal per standard procedure on 09/05/07. As part of their overall vision for the anticipated future development of the City, Public works would like to introduce a signalized intersection at the entrance to our development off of Highway 7. While we do not intend to deviate from our initial proposal in concept, the introduction ofa traffic light at the entrance to the development will necessitate some modifications to our proposal as submitted. Thus we are requesting the continuance. Respectfully submitted, /40./6/t-- Michael G. Mulhern, AIA President MGM/kap File: O: /06074/docs/continuance request 90507 1730 Blake Street, Suite 435 â€¢ Denver, Colorado 80202 â€¢ TEL: (303) 297-3334 â€¢ FAX: (303) 292-260i / -~ Marys Lake Lodge (DP OO-O7C) ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: September 18,2007 REOUEST: Approval to build seventeen dwelling units. N RK+P * LOCATION: 2625 Marys Lake Road, within . " e USFS the Town of Estes Park. 36 APPLICANT/OWNER: Don D. Debey 36 STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) i e/Dc 10%* SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer/Consultant: Van Horn Engineering (Joe Coop), 586-9388 Parcel Number: 3402434001 Development Area: acres (+/-) Number of Lots: One Existing Land Use: Accommodations Proposed Land Use: Same Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations Adjacent Zoning- East:: "A" Accommodations North:: "A" Accommodations West:: "A" Accommodations South: "E" and "E-1" Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Accommodations North: Accommodations West: Accommodations South: Undeveloped Services- Water: Town Sewer: UTSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This request pertains to Lot 3A of the Marys Lake Replat, and affects only the density calculation. The entire Marys Lake Lodge development is shown due to the inter-connectedness of parking, drives, and utilities. t . Lot 3A is currently approved for eight accommodation units, and the applicant requests to modify this to allow twelve accommodation units. The footprint of the units would not change. Instead, the lower level of the units would be redesigned to create two one-bedroom units where one two-bedroom unit is currently planned (see graphic). :.S" ty'... il ' 3 P .2 1 1 I .. ' 1 : jo ./.. :11 : â‚¬ ~ Â£44 11:aft.1 . --11 1 1 11 ' -TrT' -A iâ‚¬~| 4-*Â·Â· :z Â· 9,..._Â·--~ ~.<~i'.ff-t.â€¢ Ji.Â§13\ .f.? 1 '4 1 1 jf 1 . 4 1 1 11 - ' b 1.'. lot r:~.1'V,i/3 1 -{ 1 11,lili,-I..-f - 3 /3. ' IIi 1 1 1 -1, '- Â· AN 1 Â°04:-' 4# 1 Ay f./ 1 - 1 1 1 j 11Â·* 111--641Â·123<111\1 # -'1 I : iÂ·+Â·4 6Â·/je, â€¢, 7/ ./r// / 1 / /- -6 r.4 nr, E: 1.1,Â«0- 1 ("- 1 1 . 4 J.V ' 1 f ,- - I ; 1 11 j j 11 :- i:,40/'9/li h-/ 1 11 ..V . r . i. 1 R. f.. -- 1 1,1.qi,P r.j' .,1 _;: I 2 1 1-Â·> *k- AN. i ~f ~ '~~ ' i i i .AP liD 1 ,L , i + ...4, 1,1 = 11 - PA'. ' Â· 4 I'll D - 1 - Ill- '-La 21, NJ i : i /4-0 M.2.. 1 /4 \ /1 .. / Â·,/ 'b. 117-3 bedÂ£ 1 11===...3 1 43 1 4 This change in density will not affect parking requirements. The existing approved units each require two parking spaces. With the proposed change, each unit will require only one parking spaces (due to the units being smaller). This results in no change in overall parking requirements. This proposal will not affect Floor Area Ratio or Impervious Coverage, and meets density requirements. Density. Twelve units are proposed on this lot. The proposed density is 12.98 units per acre (12 units into .924 acres), whereas the "A" district has a maximum density, adjusted for the slope on site, of 13.69 units per acre. Therefore, this proposal meets density requirements. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Building Department. The Building Department has noted "a change in the number of units will require a complete analysis of accessibility requirements for the Page #2 - Marys Lake Lodge, Development Plan 00-07C / Development." The applicant is aware ofthis, and has discussed with the building department. Water. The water department noted :'the proposed change in numbers of units per building can affect the size of the water service line. If service lines are stubbed out for these buildings but do not meet the size requirements then they will need to be replaced with the correct line size. If no stub outs exist - review line size requirements prior to placement." Upper Thompson Sanitation District had a variety of comments regarding line size, tap/plant investment fees, and construction plans. Other. There are a variety of small formatting changes required. These have been delineated in the suggested conditions of approval. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. This amendment to the development plan complies with density requirements, and will not affect the Floor Area Ratio or Impervious Coverage, and will not affect parking requirements. 2. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 3. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for the development plan. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Marys Lake Lodge Amended Development Plan 00-07C CONDITIONAL TO compliance with the following memos: a. From Will Birchfield to Dave Shirk dated August 24,2007. b. From Greg Sievers and Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 23,2007. c. From UTSD to Dave Shirk dated August 21, 2007. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move APPROVAL of the Marys Lake Lodge Amended Development Plan 00-07C with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENIAL: I move DISAPPROVAL of Development Plan 00-07C because... (state reason for denial -findings). CONTINCANCE: I move to continue Development Plan 00-07C because... (state reasonfor continuance -findings). Page #3 - Marys Lake Lodge, Development Plan 00-07C MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: August 24,2007 Subject: Mary's Lake Lodge Condominiums Lot 3, Mary's Lake Subdivision, and Lots 3A and 3B of Mary's Lake Replat 2625 Mary' s Lake Road The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for the Revised Development Plan for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. A change in the number of units will require a complete analysis of accessibility requirements for the Development. Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering JET) Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, qsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Dave Shirk From: Greg Sievers & Scott Zum Date: August 23,2007 Re: Mary's Lake Lodge Condominiums, Lot 3, and Lots 3A and 38, Mary's Lake Replat, 2625 Mary's Lake Road After reviewing the Revised Development Plan 00-07C the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: assuming there is no change in the building footprint, no comment Light & Power: no comment Water: 1. The proposed change in numbers of units per building can affect the size of the water service line. If service lines are stubbed out for these buildings but do not meet the size requirements then they will need to be replaced with the correct line size. If no stub outs exist - review line size requirements prior to placement. â€¢ Page 1 //40Â£Sih @ UPPER 71 /Jh~STRICiD P.O. Box 568 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (970)-586-4544 (970) 586-1049 Fax August 21,2007 Dave Shirk, Planner II Town ofEstes Park P.O. 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Mary's Lake Lodge Condominiums Lot 3, Mary's Lake Subdivision, and Lots 3A and 3B of Mary's Lake Replat 2625 Mary's Lake Road Dear Dave5 The Upper Thompson Sanitation District submits the following comments for the above referenced property: â€¢ The property is in the District and can be served by gravity. â€¢ An eight inch main line extension will be required, thereby eliminating the myriad of wyes and elbows, the 4 inch to 6 inch reducing connections, and the 6 inch to 8 inch reducing connections. This requirement is consistent with Upper Thompson Sanitation District's minimum standards and considered as Adequate Public Facilities. â€¢ The District will require a separate connection to each unit. â€¢ Plans to construct will need to be submitted to the District, and upon approval, a pre-construction meeting will be scheduled. â€¢ Plant Investment and Permit fees will need to be collected at the time the building permit applications are routed through the District's administration office. â€¢ A Warranty Agreement and an Applicationfor Acceptance must be signed before the District will allow a connection to the system. r.9 If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank You, Chris Bieker Operations Manager Upper Thompson Sanitation District cc: Joe Coop GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 August 17,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTE.S PARIC,CO 8051.7 Re: Revised Development Plan 00-07C - Mary's Lake Lodge Condominiums Dear Air. Shirk: I have no comment. If you have any questions, ple:~o not hesitate to give me a call. ~,/0 Very ruly Yours, A '19 \/ C . U...1 GAW/ldr Gregot~l-W hitt CC: V-an Horn Engineering, Joe Coop Fax: 970/586-8101 F a C.r Letter of Intent The purpose of the amended development is to change the two four unit buildings on lot 3A to six unit buildings. The foot print of those buildings will not change. Very simply the intention is to turn the two lower two bedroom units in each of the two building into four one bedroom units. The parking requirements are the same as the approved plan (no change) and impervious coverage will not change (no change). The density increase is within the allowed density limitations. The change only concerns changing four lower units into eight units. Thank you, Don DeBey FE-EVE r-31 11 JUL 2 5 2007 -l,0 12â‚¬E.111520 \ r ( ESTES VALLEY < Rij IE (G IE 032& 10\1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION I )11 f U 14 JUL 2 5 2007 1 JI Submittal Date: 7/06-- gao ; % Development Plan 17 Boundary Line Adjustment Co ~ - -- F Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation 1- Preliminary Map F Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change 1- Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat 1- Time Extension r supplemental Map 1' Final Subdivision Plat 1- Other: Please specify 17 Minor Subdivision Plat 13 Amended Plat General Information Project Name Mary's Lake Lodge Development Plan Project Description Change 8 Acc Units to 12 Acc Units in the Existing Mary's Lake Lodge Development Plan Project Address 2625 Mary's Lake Road Legal Description Lot 3 Mary' Lake Sub and Lot 3a and 3b of Mary's Lake Replat 34019-34-00/ C34) 34024*0-023 Parcel ID #34024 -34-001(381 03) lection 2 Township 4N Range 73W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 7.17 acres Existing Land Use Accom/Com/Res Proposed Land Use same Existing Water Service ' 12 Town F Well F Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service P Town F Well F Other (Specify) 1 Existing Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD 08 UTSD 17 Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service EPSD F UTSD E Septic Is a sewer lift station required? E Yes IR No Existing Gas Service M Xcel 17 Other F None Existing Zoning A-Accom Proposed Zoning A-Accom Site Access (if not on public street) Cyteworth Road Are there wetlands on the site? F Yes P No Has site staking been completed? C Yes R' No W..ll b.t- de~.e b5 7/31/zoo:, Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Don Debey Mailing Address 2625 Mary's Lake Rd, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments 12 Application fee ~ 12 Statement of intent 17 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan P 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan 12 Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev Contact Information Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant F Consultant/Engineer Record Ownerls) 'Rk,AS tohi lbâ‚¬VE\-1>6)0~â‚¬Atr 6, LIC - ;f US PUc,(FliNG i hi,NFLb*,WMr- / FiC- Mailing Address 2,15 *01Â£01 UKE- 26, 6:37%5 AMK, 62) 80417 Phone 170-58[,-5968 Cell Phone 170'Afq_ 1032- Fax 110 -594. 5302 Email Applicant boN bâ‚¬*F Mailing Address .16,70&Â£- Phone M r Cell Phone AD/)116- Fax Email . ConsultanVEngineer \/UET- J,E(DE]VIR_[7\ - Mailing A~ . ri SEP -6 2007 ilf Cell Phone , U Ul Fax Email APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: <Ent ~A +eu b AppliCant PLEASE PRINT: DON De 86 f tures: Record Owner 1)0,4 ,De 3 gy 496-Z>g:~ Date 9-5-07 Applicant Date 09Â£1- It; I APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge~ and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. # In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. â€¢ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. I I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: RAMs 0008Â» D d 4 ~ A Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Do') I F) 5 0 e y Signatures: Record Owner LOU)~z...<<-- Date 4 - 5-0 7 Applicant L_..L./ ~--~ - - Date r/r - 23 PÂ©EDVE~ _|7~ SEP - 6 2007 Revised 06/26/07 h Â£ A N g g F LD Â·r- th 00 w #50 82*aw*HE 9 2 20002 Ng: 84- 8,- mO 400 Soce-ES0NB~1228-8~ ~ C=:2 220 1000 --1 co <00 8 -8*888&688fE~.2:zoe. xoREgo083 Â§8000â‚¬n" 1~ *2 8 'Â°--2 ~0 0 -~- 0-CO < Z~ -g~ 8232 93 4#**21 O 0 -cihi OE @ &2 ONOE- 0 0 0 m & 2 m 5 01.1- DO E m 2 90 @ 2 do to . IN & ,-- g8%82 1 %8 4 -0 g E- g 4 0 w - 0, m 0 -0; ti ~ .aÂ· â‚¬ R E & ci a 0 0- 0. 0-00 C 0 2 -r- C wm m o ~ -%- g ~ -g tz 2 -c 2-E 2 -c -2 -m E 2 26 * E 2 323 -3 E 1 co 2 - 2-~-5 Â§0 0 0 0 5 4- 2 -5 E 0 0 -(0 0 0 0 D-U J.C.g J u) J:CU (0 0 0 0- 0 8 0 1-N JE**EN@ I 6*(5~ 0 21.U LL *0-UJ U.O J<< COM LOWI-S (00 -, I HUJUILL J.30<11- LU LLI LL LA S 0-0-0 (D 8 CO C 4 0 1 v c (D 6 - 0 - f M Z 0 8 J -Â·- 8 1- .0 J E.b (1) co N O W O CD ~t-LUI~ p m (D-t @385 20 O a) a) oP)>= 4-0< O (Ov 2 E â‚¬ v -1 C >. 0 --1 c g ~ Â£Â¤ JE MA LQ O *.2 - e~.2@*#ga** 2 0 -7 -2 =E accoeork gal=me coME<-Â·mi E&**tâ‚¬%& &20**0 ifiEwE %* t=* 2 JE OJ<~U~Â·v -c (D - CD O 0 6 6 9 E< a.Ill cocamELLiNS**2- m *- 65(/52-5 0~~04[Ili:=osococ/) 8 0 OOP..0- CO O ~ ~ 1.0 ID LO ~ 00 1.0 10 N h u : Cd O ID 4- O O N 00 - C) O 0 (V A - C) O 00 0 - w â„¢ 4. M T , C\1 tO 91- O C\1 4- C) O N N OCONCOLD-- N ,-OCU T- C) r 4- CU C\1 0001.010 09 CD BRO.-OALOCD t - 00 N O CD OO CO - CD O N NOO,-00'JODOON C\1 htÂ·COLON CU 00 - C) 00 - CD NUVEr,-- - 4- 1.0 < C) (9 - LO CO N 1.0 0 00 (\1 .-C) C)00,-000.-0000-0009 CU 00 N CU -,Â·-,-1,-,-*O-0-00 al 91Â· C\1(04- C 1- N Â® 2 N %3 E im M V -2 0 ~ TB F Or O 18 0 2 or R m 0 0 CO r 0 LL E a) E E .2 c C IB O) C CO - e our .5 2 5% 6 0 OD 5-m m ag % S. -0 m A 23= I o @~m . 25 g - 8 2/ 2/ JM di 28 M ft EP h 8 w Lo w G G in< 0 - 00 C c CD (D > e (D L.0 -AÂ· 0 co -0 0 J % 2 2 0 25 0 gj..E * g -% g W 9 -C 4 2 0 a.8 2< c (0 OEE= E I Râ‚¬ 09 b >, m Z' E && .5!1 :* In 2 2 m *25@ E & 5 9 8 20 5 20 <EA in g M Y 0/5 2 2 & 3.01 Y % 2. 55 0 - E ooj - 06 'X El#lic~:BN@232#12â‚¬:%5R1:22 06 0 0 0 1 m 0 6 2 z â‚¬ .Z -2 3 Â·~ g $ 5 i E 81 ~s * Â·c % b m k S .- a. :g .22 E O o I= c~30 9 5 @Â·c 20 JÂ® ~ (1) n CO M -C - * 00 ~ .1.62 -5 0 & 8 g s' 2 f K -% 9 O,--1<Im=6503=2=4882065J=,acisoise Â·Ma@co*55#BHORS<oaN de Leon Court AL 36542 A 92075-2132 a Davie 80528 80524 !6-7410 93908 LIWIN ues 9EZ96 olo EE UIJA '1!EJ ZESO EL peo 41!eJ AAI 1 OV\I L9099 S 9 L LO O,~Ziuue 1507 nuskewicz 209 A lokoo Place ton Aven 902 'eig 'enueAV e68lloo ents, LLC h S eet, S ite UAAO 06 oe UeZUeJ enue eli!40Jv ueqny ze40 3688 Box 144 Owner 11 OZO-00dCIAew sopuoo 85p ron Chilson racey Ethridge Dugan oberta Gustafson Richard L I . E a;F ,- R CO O iEZ 26--r CO dice Â£55*g 07% 2 0 (6 2 8- Â§ orocoMbsom N N DLL O 8 8 -- CE if P a ~ g 1238% %0 ES 0 1- 10 00 N O. .m a (1) % =5~ Â£ (006 &3 8 E 2 (13 C cD - O C 9 2 5 M E.M 001Â£ 00 Waa 1- Z ma Jo Smith 2625 M s ake ,#N203 CO 80517 ichael Tamburrino rry Street, Unit 18 CO 80501 James and Cathy Tyree Avenue risti, TX 78404 bara & Frederick Iverman reeley, CO 80634 , TX 76714 Page Worthington Trust PO Box 373 Chestertown, MD 21620 Owner 11 1 & Lawrence Schmitt OLO-OOCICIAey sopuoo 06pol e>lel s,Xle,\1 ren Stovall rvor & Kem Wardlaw \MARY'SM % 0/ 43)- M Ney) Yifc - m Revised Development Plan #4 m % 00 1 4 /1 for Mary' S Lake Lodge, Lot 3 of Mary' s Lake Subdivision and Lot Sa and 35 of Ma,TU' s PROMON-TORY l'A 1k'h Sk>i&3 2 '- 'T. nl~ O Po,nl r,+ n P nÂ¥+4 n,n nf 52Â£,râ€¢+4 n,n 9 TAQ, i,n 06 44, Li AT-Â·th D,14'rin 7 9 Wn c.+ 2,6 D 1/ z DR. \2\\/ ,; . . e , 1/ W.\ ' / m/L n C SI- 0~00 WR Lâ€¢,1 * T CURVE C C C2 C4 CE Cf Câ‚¬ C; PROJ 1. THIS SIT SURVEY PL 2. APPROVI OF 30' WA, SITE SHALL ADJUSTMEN SURFACES REQUIRE A 3. ZONING AS 15' FRC 4. ALL REC 5. THE OWI A.D.A AND 6. ALL WAL 7. TRASH [ USED AT T 8. THE WILI CODE AND 9. UTILITIEE C 10. LIMITS CONSTRUel S 11. ALL EX 12. ALL BU THE UNITS 40' 13. ALL UT MARYS LAI i-07 COPPER FC CONDUIT F( THROUGHOl 14. A GENE 15. THERE 16. THIS DI 17. ACCOMI ~EÂ©EOVE TO THE PR 18. PARKIN 19. EXISnN ~ SE' 12 2007 20. IN ALL 21. ALL POSTAL ADDRESSES WILL BE DELIVERED 10 IHE ON-31 It CLUb ItK IUX. ANY NEED zON AUDI IloNAL Muxtb AIALAILK 0 40 80 120 ~ i Vir,/vi, .1 IVTL.L. wn, v. - Â£,~v VEVLD LD .[1, .L/DoluivÂ£,1-1. 1 DATE WILL BE ADDED AT THE SAME LOCAnON. 0. / 1 EX 8' WATER UNE INTERSECTION n TO KIOWA RIDGE - 100' TO INT. 640'- 5 VAN HORN ENGINEERING RAM'S HORN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 1 22. NO BUILDING PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED FOR PHASE 4 AND 5 UNTIL THE 8" WATERMAIN IS IN PLACE AND ACCEPTED BY THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. -G-CuipsTAION (330' up E- <~ CONTACT: JOE COOP 2625 MARY'S LAKE ROAD 23. NO CERnFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE ISSUED FOR UNITS 40 AND 41 UNTIL SUCH TME THAT THE SECTION OF KIOWA TRAIL G-G 1043 FISH CREEK RD. ESTES PARK, CO 80517 -9=222@~w___" -2~_ GEIQ~LIBUL) -~, REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO THESE UNITS HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED. 71-~-t-193~NEPERTY-W--3% h ESTES PARK, CO 80517 586-5958 24. MAINTENANCE OF ON-SITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OR THE PROFERTY 586-9388 PROJ. NO. OWNER. I I \ ZONING DISTRICT: El 2004-09-01 SNIA]AanS (INV SNI NIDN3 NHOH NVA L[909 00nl0100 '>I@Vd S31S3 M33h10 HSI=1 Â£*0 1 00 ')INVd SlLS~ 1018-989 (OLÂ© XÂ¥.3 * (OL6) 3NOHd irr= . ifllii~ . 0 . 0 0 000 0 0 00 0.0 00 ...0 .0 , A.... A . U WE . . 0 1 - 1 0 01 0 . . . 0-: 1 - 1- 1 : 0 1 ... 0 0. D .. .. 1 - I . 0 . 1.-: 1 â€¢ '#31%I~'.Â·~ I - .-. . 1 . ...0 . 0 1 - 0 . 0 - .. . .1 0 . 0- 1. 1 0 - 0-1 0 0 0 -- I. #0.1~,~:5~41 0.'A. ...0.0 8 + .. : 0 - 0- 2.0 0 ...... , 0 L .. . 0 .1 . :.. . 1 1. .0 =-1 */8: ~I'll.IN-,Fli~li~~.0 , f: 1~ 0 2.0 . 0 . . .. 0 . 01 :00 f . . - 0- 1 0- 0 , .1 .. . 1 ;.. 1. -- 1 ..11 11 . e 0 .. . ;.. .0 . 0 ... . N 2,1 1 D . A . 5.1.5,1.00 e -al , 1 - 0 0 Z .: 9 .1. .Sl~ "* -4- . - . ... 1 0 , 0 1 0. .... 1 0 , 0 E * % 6-1 N .0 . 0. . 0.0 1 . ..... 1 - D 1/4 - 2Â»k . 0 .. .\ i. i\,4Â» :~ 1 . I .r. -,5 L+9*v . , A D Ola: ''...... 1 . 1 0. 0 0. D .. . 1 0 1 . 4 .0 .DA 0 :00 : :0-:I -= ya*?44. --Fl-:-,. ....0 . 0 oDA 0 Â® :0 I i - --awwk--W- .. . \ f . '4, ~ - 'PM*#;Bilm d'14~. . b.~ ~~ 0 ' =~0~0 I '~ ' I - 10 -2-41. '' 0 .. 0 1.-- j ./ b : .0 0 4 1,4 , A. .3*. /0 /0 0 0 \11 0 - .: 1 Imal 0 - - r.jiwimwn-Â£Â£ 41 344' yaw - ..- .. 0 : ,...= ., \ i \ . - .',' ... ;.. .0 . , p -44. 4//AA . D ; 0. . I .. .k f . 1 0 , I. - . 1 0 Â® 0 V -7, . , - 1 1 1, 11 6 ./1~ 1 0 1 ,. 1 . 1 I. ..- .0 0 . 7.1.0 , *4wellilillibltfillililinlili:11*VEN.ijil#Pr: : 2: 'diellimilwY Vqllililillbol:lijA VI#jil:fli 0 1 .. .. ,- I. . 1 : 2 - - C~,1, , . -/ I./Irfilluillillilli1i'i~fTillillililliliAh VIV~illi~*i ... T--1,-- 70~ 0. pum&5\\.. d . . I . . 1 . ... 1 1 ... - ~,9k-f 4 0, :k ,~ ~ '9'. E .. \*fr . + 11 1 1 ..â€žâ€ž.....â€žâ€ž"." -- 0 - 0 .: wa r ry- 0 0 ... 1 ....'V :' 7 1. I '11 ' .1- \4 - . e 1 .. 0 : 0. *t//9..W :~~~ - 1 .-1 : - . - =. 4,.Vi -. 1 1 2. 4. .1, \'0 .// , :04 p \ ... . 1.1 .. 1 - .. 1 ~t - 10 1 0 6 - .* . k.... ..24 I 1 .1 2 -1&-1~~.41 . 00 1 0 .. . 0, -41\ 1,7140 - h .r 0 0.0 , ... St ,-. 1,4..~.. -- 1.- \~ 0.- 4.1 ..ji~-'A . 1 I. 1 '1 X 4 0 0 -- %-1/LE I.- - 1, * t '' 4 . 9 ./EL- f -~: - 13/9.le:mul/"ti VT, H . 0 r .4 .. 1 . 0 UU I.an:Â©A \ . 0 .: . 91- ' \. .~.A --lib# . 4 ,/489 , 0 0 0- . 9. 4 A. --- I. . 1 ..=.-1 1 - 9 . A. . . .. . I. . -1.~I~.Lb- N. . ~ 1 0 - - = 1 4.Ja * 0 -- - .. . 0.:. 0 0 - . . 1 = ... V/~~ ,@-1//I'll'll'll//:234#. 0 1 - . : 1 :. .1 . .- , : 1 e'll-' 1 -'' 0 -Ii' 1 : . 1.1 0 .. , 9678 0 *44. .... 5 VIA 1 . : 1 . 1: . I. . 6 . .1 . ... 1 D-I . . OIll- 0 . 0 1 . 1 . ..... 1 0 1 0 I . - 1 0 , - 1 1 1 - 0. 0 . I I - -I. i:.-'.0 '. #. I .... = - + 'AJA *P .4 WTANFJA#&444. - -- .... I : . I... 1 - . 1 - D: . .1 - . I. . 1 . . 0 - .0 0 - .. . 0 m . . . 91 1 . , 0. ././<,-1 : - ...9 j 1 ..... " 0 0 0. ~ ~ I . I . . 0 - .1 = 11 -- . 1 .- 0, I I. a I 1 ..1 - :1 0. ..:, 4..,4 - I . 1 .2. - 1 /. lu~ M/ -/ 0- 1 . 1 - 1. 0 -1 ...0.-1 0. 0. . '11!111 ' C' 111 r . . 0 I. . . 1 - 11 - ,.... 0 .... I : I ./: 01 I ~ D ...I.. 1 . I . 2. . 1 '0 - ' ' ts 13â€¢ 1 I. I ..: ...1 0 1 ...= I .0 - 46 , ly.p. 1 P .. 0 I 1 - 0 -I 'll-'' 1 : 0 0. 0=: I .1. ... . 1 0. . 0 - 1 . 0.-= 1 . 0 4. 0 1 . 1 1: 1.- .1 0 -- 1 1 . .1 I . -- . 4. -, I ., 0/ .. . .1 6 r . ... 0 20 = 1 - ... , The Timbers Development Plan (DP 07-10) ~ and Preliminary Condominium Map Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~ PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: September 18, 2007 REOUEST: Approval to build thirteen E .2 k y? dwelling units. -0.../. -jr / 1-h-=Â·, r2_1-4 LOCATION: Lot 3 Schroeder Subdivision .1- - - 11 (behind the Travel Lodge on Big Thomson - 36 Rocky 36 Avenue). h'bumin .... 7 I USFS N/kld F~11< LN. e APPLICANT: Mark Theiss L.JFS PROPERTY OWNER: In Sean John ~ Bic..hy RM\P (owner of Travel Lodge) STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Alpine Engineering (Paul Bennett), 577-1581 Parcel Number: 2519406003 Development Area: 1.88 acres (+/-) Number of Lots: One Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use: Multi-family residential Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations (with potential for individual units to be rented short-term) Adjacent Zoning- East:: "A" Accommodations North: "A" Accommodations West: "E-1" Estate South: "E-1" Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Accommodations North: Accommodations West: Single-family residence South: Single-family residence Services- Water: Town Sewer: EPSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to build thirteen dwelling units dispersed throughout four triplexes and a detached unit. The property is currently undeveloped, and contains shallow drainage swales, grass and shrubs, and pine trees in the eastern portion of the lot. Access is from Grand Estates Drive. All necessary utilities are available to serve this proposal, though stormwater drainage will require careful consideration. REVIEW CRITERIA: This development plan is subject to applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Zoning Requirements. Land Use. The proposed land use is allowed in the "A" Accommodations district, which allows residential and accommodations uses by right. Densio;. The proposed thirteen units require 73,800 square feet of net land area. The available 80,409 square feet satisfy this requirement. Therefore, this proposal meets density requirements. Specific density calculations are set forth on the development plan cover sheet. Impervious Coverage. The "A" district has a maximum impervious coverage of 50%; the proposed 43.8% complies with this requirement. Impervious coverage will be verified with the required as-built plans. Floor Area Ratio. The "A" district does not have a Floor Area Ratio requirement. Pedestrian Amenities and Linkage Requirements. Table.4-8 requires provision for pedestrian linkages. A sidewalk along Grand Estates Drive is proposed, as well as a short sidewalk along the interior drive. It is Staffs opinion this short walk will adequately serve the property. Setbacks. This proposal complies with setback requirements. The "A" district requires buildings and structures be set back fifteen feet from the street, ten feet from side property lines, and fifteen feet from the rear property line. These requirements are increased to twenty-five feet when adjacent to a residentially zoned property, as is the case with the southeastern and southern lot lines. Comprehensive Plan. Section 3.8.D requires development plans be consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. Page #2 - The Timbers t , The Estes Valley Plan includes several Community Wide Policies focusing on Land Use, Community Design, Growth Management, Mobility and Circulation, Housing, and Scenic and Environmental Quality. It is Staff's opinion the proposed development plan complies with applicable policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. A few specific policies include: 1.7 Urban land use should occur within the Town limits of Estes Park. 2.6 The natural colors or wood and stone are most desirable for building exteriors. 3.1 Encourage infill of older core areas in order to reduce infrastructure costs and to stabilize residential neighborhoods. Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance Standards" applies to this proposal. No grading, excavation or tree/vegetation removal shall be permitted, whether to provide for a building site, for on-site utilities or services, or for any roads or driveways, before issuance of a building permit. All disturbed areas will need to be restored in accordance with Section 7.2.C "Restoration ofDisturbed Areas." Limits ofDisturbance. Section 7.2.D requires the Decision Making Body approve proposed Limits of Disturbance for all development plans. This section includes criteria for establishing Limits ofDisturbance. It is Staffs opinion the proposed LOD meet these criteria. Tree and Vegetation Protection. Existing trees to remain shall be fenced for protection prior to any site work. Tree protection fencing shall comply with standards set forth in Appendix D.VIII. Landscaping and Buffers. The proposed landscaping plan meets the required quantity of plants, and the design satisfies requirements set forth in the development code. The landscaping along the southern boundary needs minor changes regarding location of landscaping in the Estes Park Sanitation District easement. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. No lighting fixture shall be higher than fifteen feet above ground. The proposed light fixtures comply with this standard. Off-Street Parking and Loading. This proposal requires twenty-nine parking stalls; forty will be provided. All units will have attached garages, most of which will be two-car. Most of the units will also have driveway space in front of the units that will accommodate one or two vehicles. Finally, three of the parking spaces will be for guest parking. Page #3 - The Timbers It is Staffs opinion the proposed parking scheme satisfies the needs of the project, and will function adequately. Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Drainage/Water Quality Management. All required drainage facilities shall be installed and accepted in accordance with Section 7.12.F, which allows 25% of building permits to be issued prior installation of the drainage facilities. The Town Engineer has approved the proposed drainage plan. Transportation. The driveway system will function adequately, and the applicant proposes to build the entry drive to full street standards (width, corner geometry, thickness). CDOT has noted a new access permit will be required, though no highway improvement will be. Electric. All electric service is to be placed underground. Power will be supplied by the existing overhead line near the northern property boundary, and a new transformer will be installed near the southeast corner of building 2. Building 1 will receive power from the existing overhead line near the southwest corner of the site. Sanitacy Sewer. Sanitary sewer will be serviced through the existing EPSD eight- inch line along the southern property boundary. Private service lines are shown on the plan. Water. Water will be served by an existing twelve-inch line near the northern property boundary. An eight-inch main will be extended from this through the interior of the property, with service lines branching from there. Fire Protection. Per Section 7.12.G, all required fire protection requirements shall be installed prior to issuance of a building permit. Two new hydrants are proposed; one near the entry and one at the east end of the site. These will satisfy fire flow requirements. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Estes Park Sanitation District has provided comments regarding the proposed sewer main design, which should be redesigned per their comments. Page #4 - The Timbers , Town Attorney H/hite had comments regarding the proposed five-year phasing plan, which has since been revised to a three-year plan. Building Department. The Building Department provided a standard Development Plan Review Checklist, which the applicant should familiarize themselves with. The Applicant should contact Will Birchfield (577-3728) to discuss building issues such as demolition, grading, and building permit requirements. Light and Power had a variety of standard comments related to electric infrastructure requirements. Americans with Disabilities Act. The proposed sidewalk ramps will need to be designed to meet ADA standards, which allow one inch o f rise for every foot o f run and must have "truncated domes" for visual and tactile distinction. Conduits. Per Section 7.13, "conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be screened, covered or painted to minimize visual impacts." Construction Plans. Final construction plans shall be approved by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department and EPSD prior to issuance of the grading permit and/or first building permit. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. The development plan will comply with applicable standards set forth in this Code. 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 4. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for the development plan, while the preliminary condominium map requires final approval by the Town Board. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed "The Timbers" Preliminary Condominium Map and Development Plan 07-10 CONDITIONAL TO: 1) Final construction plans (including erosion control plan) shall be approved by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department and EPSD prior to issuance of the grading permit and/or first building permit. Page #5 - The Timbers 2) Compliance with the following memos: a. From Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated July 19, 2007. b. From Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated July 27,2007. c. From EPSD to Dave Shirk dated August 15,2007. 3) The trash enclosure shall be subject to review and approval of the Colorado Division of Wildlife prior to issuance of first building permit, and shall be installed prior to issuance of first certificate of occupancy. 4) The grading plan shall bear an engineer's stamp. 5) Copies of applicable state permits shall be submitted with first grading/building permit (e.g. stormwater, CDOT access). 6) A development agreement and form of guarantee shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the town prior to issuance of any permits. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move approval of the proposed "The Timbers" Preliminary Condominium Map and Development Plan 07-10 with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENIAL: I move DISAPPROVAL of the proposed "The Timbers" Preliminary Condominium Map and Development Plan 07-10 because... (state reason for denial - findings). CONTINUANCE: I move to continue the proposed "The Timbers" Preliminary Condominium Map and Development Plan 07-10 because ... (state reason for continuance - findings). Page #6 - The Timbers -- Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 8051 7 July 31,2007 Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517-1200 RE: The Timbers of Estes Dear Dave Shirk, The above development plan and preliminary Condominium Map for the above refer- enced properly will need to be reviewed by the Board of Directors of the Estes Park Sanitation District, Our next meeting will be on August 14~ 2007, I will prepare and de- liver their comments to you on the following day. I will also fax a copy to Paul Bennett. Thank you. Sincerely, V \ James Duell Distict Manager ~EÂ©EUVE[1\ =~~ AUG -1 ~ ~ li Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 14/lublli// Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 8051 7 August 15,2007 Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517-1200 RE: Timbers of Estes Dear Dave Shirk, Upon review of the proposed Development Plan and Preliminary Condominium Map for the above mentioned property the Dislrict has the following comments: 1. The District would like to work with the development to Improve the service in this area prior to their construction. We would like to replace our eight-inch clay mains that extend through the development with PVC pipe, This will allow the District to provide service with routine cleaning for years to come. Timing issues will be worked out with the developers. 2. We will allow the condominium association to install and maintain their own six-inch service line. However lhe circuitous route proposed would likely be a maintenance issue wilh the number of clean outs and bends required. Instead a manhole should be Installed on the main line that will allow for a short direct connection into the development. A manhole will also be required at the point where it connects with the service line from the upper unit of Building 3. This will allow access at several points for maintenance and cleaning. The Dis- trict can install the lower manhole and Install a service line stub into the development at the time of our main replacement. 3. If the service line for ihe upper unit of Building 3 can make grade In the same direction of 1he lower lwo units we would recommend this service path. 4. The District has a policy of not allowing trees. either planted or naturally growing within our easement. This will need to be observed. 5. Dralnage/ flow from commercial developments north of this proposal will need to be inves- tigated by District staff to make sure it meets District rules and regulations. 6. System investment fees will apply for all new units. 10@ECE!1=11 Thank you. Sincerely, -AUG 15 @0 1.~ 3*:26 21â€¢ James Duell District Manager Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 July 18, 2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-10 and Preliminary Condominium Map - The Timbers of Estes Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Statement of Intent indicates that the project will be phased over a five-year time period. Vesting over three years requires approval of the extended vesting period by the Board o f Trustees of the Town o f Estes Park. I f you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Netv Truly Yours, /\ 40-V ij Gregefy A. White G AW/ldr ft CC: Alpine Engineering, Paul Bennett Fax: 970/577-1591 MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: July 27,2007 Subject: The Timbers of Estes Lot 3, Schroder Subdivision 1240 Big Thompson Ave. The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for Development Plan and Preliminary Condominium Map for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. Please see attached Development Plan Review Checklist comments. , Review Date: 7/27/2007 Review By: Will Birchfield DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 1240 Big Thompson Ave. Address U Official street names and addresses shall be approved and/or assigned by the Department of Building Safety. U A detailed site plan is required and shall include utility locations, setbacks, contours, drainage, landscaping, access, easements, etc. Â£ A grading and drainage plan shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U Grading plans and permits are required prior to and are separate from building permits. A grading permit is required prior to any grading or excavation (Estes Park Municipal Code Â§14.12.030) U The limits of site disturbance shall be maintained and are restricted to within the property lines and/or to areas specified on the approved plans. El Prior to any excavation and/or construction activity, a detailed drainage/erosion plan to protect neighboring properties, public right-of-ways, and drainage areas during the construction phase shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Filtration of storm water is required prior to release from the site. Failure to comply with said approved plans may result in an immediate stop work order on the entire development. The final site drainage plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department. U The foundation systems, including mitigation of potential water problems shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. El Foundation setback and elevation certificates shall be provided by a Colorado design Professional, and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U A construction traffic plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works and Police Departments prior to obstructing or interfering with any vehicular traffic on public right-of-ways. Il All new construction shall comply with all applicable accessibility laws. It is the designers' and developers' responsibilities to comply with laws that Town staff does not have the authority to interpret nor the responsibility to enforce, such as ADA, Federal and State Fair Housing Acts, etc. Additionally, the designer shall specifically detail how the proposed development shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the 2003 IBC, Chapter 11. Detailed accessibility specs are required. U There are no accessibility requirements in the IRC, therefore the Development Plan needs to be revised to the IBC. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-1240 Big Thompson Ave..doc Revised 10/17/2006- CB U Compliance with the accessibility requirements of CRS 9-5 is required, and includes an implementation plan prior to issuance of any building permits. U Minimum two hour fire-resistance-rated construction is required between all dwelling units. U All appendages, such as decks and roofs must be shown on the plans, including building footprint details and construction details. U Building permits are required prior to any construction and/or remodeling. U Permit applications must be submitted on Short Term Residential forms. U A Building permit is required for temporary construction office trailers. U A Building permit is required for fences over six feet in height. m Sign permits and temporary sign permits are required and are separate from building permits. U The sign does not meet the 8 foot setback per plan scaling- Show distance to property and visibility triangle per Appendix D. U All requirements of the approved development plan shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of approved variances shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of Planning Commission conditions of approval shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. El A pre-construction meeting with Town staff and construction contractors is required prior to issuance of building permits. U There are still active violations at 1220 Big Thompson Ave. (Travel Lodge) Please have owners schedule a meeting with Chief Building Official Will Birchfield at 577- 3728 or 577-3725 to obtain resolution. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review-1240 Big Thompson Ave..doc Revised 9/19/2006- CB Memo To: Bob Goehting From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 07-19-07 Re: The Timbers of Estes, 1240 Big Thompson Avenue The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for Multi-Family Development Plan for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4) The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5) Easements need to accompany new lot lines in new proposed locations. 6) Easements also need to accompany all existing primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 7) The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 8) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 9) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 10)All primary electric must be buried 4' deep in a 6" conduit with warning tape at 2'. All secondary must be buried 2' deep with warning tape at l' in the appropriately sized conduit for the conductor. 11) Submit plans from the project electrical engineer for Town review and approval. 12) We will need to know the size of each individual service, type of heat and whether or not air conditioning is being proposed. 1 A Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3582, szurn@estes.org Memo TO: Dave Shirk , Planner 11 From: Scott A. Zum P.E. Director of Public Works Date: July 27,2007 Re: The Timbers of Estes After reviewing the Development Plan and Preliminary Condominium Map for the above referenced submittal, the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: 1. STREETS: a. The applicant is responsible for construction of the roadway and appurtances to full Town standards within the property boundaries to the centerline of the skeet. If the Town elects to defer portions of the requirements the applicant will be required to pay to the Town the difference between what are the full improvements and the deferred improvements. b. The applicant will be required to construct a concrete drainage pan across the entrance of the project to Town standards. c. The applicant must provide details of the transition of the ditch drainage along Grand Estates Dr. into a curb and gutter section on the northern entrance to the projed d. The applicant must provide an inlet or other approved method of delivering the drainage in the curb and gutter to the natural drainage way in the center of the properties southern property line. e. The internal street system does not provide adequate distance in front of the garage areas. f. The internal street system does not provide adequate infrastructure to convey offsite drainage through the proposed project. g. Is the internal street system private with access easements or is it proposed as a public street? Neither designation was found. 2. DRAINAGE: a. The applicant must provide 20 ft drainage easements for the two contributing offsite drainage areas into the drainage detention and water quality ponds b. The applicant must provide a drainage easement for the detention pond limits and its outlet structures. â€¢ Page 1 0l c. The applicant must provide 10 ft of dearance from all structures within the detention pond areas for maintenance. d. The applicant must provide method of structure protection utilized to protect the structures adjacent to detention ponds from frequent flooding. e. The applicant will be required to size the water quality ponds to all of the contributing water sheds, not just the proposed project. f. The applicant will need to change the proposed point source pipe delivery of storm water to the existing drainage way to the south. The applicant must show a method of delivering a sheet flow to the adjacent property as was historically the case. Note: The Public Works Dept. may have additional comments or requirements as additional detail and information is provided for review. â€¢ Page 2 TRAVELODGE P.O. BOX 1632 1220 BIG THOMPSON AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 (PHN) 970-586-4421; (FAX) -586-8173; (Toll Free) 877-262-8815 E-MAIL: Travelodge EP@aol.com; (WEB) http://www.the.travelodge.com/estespark12780 August 18, 2007 RE: Timbers of Estes Mr. Dave Shirk Planner II Estes Valley Planning Commission Dear Mr. Shirk: I am the owner ofthe Lot 3, Schroder Subdivision. I understand that a development ofthe referred Lot submitted by the Timbers of Estes is to be evaluated on Tuesday, August 21, 2007 at 1:30 PM. I have a question and concern on the decision process of Planning Commission on the development plan. My question is: Does the Phase-numbering shown on the development plan (07-10 and Preliminary Condominium Map) is the order of building construction work? In other words, once the development plan is approved as it shows, the developer should proceed to construct the condo-buildings following the order of Phase-numbering? If your answer is Yes!. Then, the Phase numbering shown on the development plan should be changed. For your reference, below I have provided you with the order of construction work in accordance with contract and verbal agreement between property owner and the developer. Using the Phase- numbers shown on the development plan, the construction order should be as follows: First construction work : Phase-1. After completion of Phase- 1, Second construction work : Phase-3. After completion of Phase-3, Third construction work : Phase-4. After completion of Phase-4, Fourth construction work : Phase-5. After completion ofPhase-5, Fifth construction work : Phase-2. Your answer and instruction would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Kun H. John CC: Larry Tomek, Realty Broker r , 1 T Job No: 2007-111 Date: 8-8-07 TO: Estes Park Planning Department Attn: Dave Shirk PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Letter of Intent for'The Timbers' Condominiums Lot 3 Schroeder Subdivision Alison, Proiect Summary: The Developer, The Sanctuary, LLC (Mark Theiss, President), wishes to purchase the subject property from In Seon John and develop the property with condominiums intended for year round living. Four tri-plex units and one single unit are proposed. Every effort has been made to protect the existing large trees and rock outcroppings. A private paved drive will serve the units. Although it is the intent of the developer to sell these units the developer would like to retain the right to rent these units out on a short term basis. This would classify the building use as R-1 and requires driveway widths to meet non-residential standars. Zoning/Setbacks: This property is zoned A-Accommodations. The maximum building height will be 21'6" which is well within the 30' maximum height. The number of proposed multi family units are 12 which meets the standard of 5400 sf of lot area per unit along with one single unit with a requirement of 9000sf. Proposed are 4 triplex units along with 1 stand alone unit. Proper setbacks are shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. Adjacent zoning is A-Accommodations and E-Estate. Steep Slopes and Hazards: The average slope of this parcel is around 8%. There are no geologic, wetland, floodplain, stream and river corridor, ridgeline protection, or wildfire hazards on this PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES P.O. BOX 39 ESTES PARK. COLORADO 970.577.1581 p 970.577.1591 1 970.443.8269 c paul@atpinebuilderslk.com parcel. Access: A single 20' wide proposed access is shown off of Grand Estates Drive. This access has been placed 175' north from the intersection of Pine Drive. A secondary access will not be needed for this development as the ADT count is less than 120. A stop sign will be installed at this access point. Sight distances from this access point to the north and south are 450' and 334' respectively. With a posted speed of 30mph 300ft of sight distance is required. There is shown 7.5' of Right-of-Way dedication along Grand Estates Drive. Also shown is proposed curb, gutter, and sidewalk along Grand Estates. There is an internal walk shown from Building 1 out to Grand Estates Drive. Utilities: Water Will be provided by Estes Park Water Department via services that will come off the proposed 8" main. Sewer Will be provided by Estes Park Sanitation District's main which runs along the south property line. Private service lines are shown. Natural gas Will be provided by Xcel via a gas line that runs along the west boundary. Telephone Will be provided by Qwest via the existing underground along the north boundary. Cable TV Will be provided by Comcast vie the overhead cable along the west boundary. Storm Drain There is a private storm drain pipe proposed which will be located in a 20' utility easement in order to route off site flows through the property. Landscaping: A landscape plan is being submitted with this submittal. There is a district landscaping buffer shown adjacent to the areas where there will be development due to the adjacent E-Estate zoning. Parking: The required 2.25 parking spaces per unit have been provided for and shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. One car accessible and one van accessible ADA parking spot are shown. ISO Calculations: ISO calculations have been included. Two new fire hydrants will need to be added for this development. These fire hydrants will be served by a new 8" main that will be served by the existing 12" water main along the north property line. Drainage Considerations: C C l A drainage report is included with this submittal. All open channel concerns have been addressed. There is a proposed detention pond which will release at historic rates. Water quality has been provided for on site flows. Phasina: The developer intends to build in 5 phases over a 3 year time period. A phasing plan is included. Variances: No variances are sought at this time. Thank you for your consideration of this development plan. Please don't hesitate to call with any questions. Paul Bennett, PE f ESTES VALLEY C -1[A Ec--e--0 â‚¬5#Â§1 b.- 1| t H DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATI~~1~~ 11. 1 11 1~.81' JUN 27 = 4 1: Ill 11 Submittal Date: LU n Type of Application ~0- Development Plan E Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map E Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation 1*Preliminary Map r Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change r Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify 1- Minor Subdivision Plat F Amended Plat General Information Project Name 17Aâ‚¬. Â·Ttw' L ers a T G5+e<, Project Description 12.252* AL 1 Vvt-4 a, \ Project Address '6*0Â·.--4,9*0046.*6*sve,fe< 1240 136 -Gapsâ€¢. A.,e. Legal Description Ut 3 S ch Bo & e' 5.6 , as-I-2, 91,,- k Parcel ID # 2-5-10 4 - 04 - 003 Section Township Range Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 1,86 Existing Land Use \M.C. a.vvf Proposed Land Use Rieâ‚¬ 21Â¢42,1 0 Existing Water Service K Town F Well F Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 1*Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service 1~ EPSD r UTSD F Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service 1* EPSD r UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes IF<5 No Existing Gas Service M Xcel F Other F None Existing Zoning A I Proposed Zoning /~ ~ Site Access (if not on public street) /-- Are there wetlands on the site? F Yes Pk No /-9 Thlked (01 hu,e- -p,w: * t.#9)ek .bl Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. C6mplete? F Yes IF No 719, 07 Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person ~1~*2*~ 151 4,4&. 1 Mailing Address 01424*r"/SWA/*O 83- B W 37 6sks Pc.iÂ£ Attachments IT~pplication fee 12' Statement of intent r 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan r 11")(17"reducedcopyof platorplan~'Dii.-Â£_ 54,1.6 lelj of# 126( e 65â‚¬5 4Names & mailing adqresses qf neighboring property owners (see attached handout) L.90 Alre:.di 1~abÂ«,41â‚¬J 61;-FIA, 412*4 34 Please review the Estes Valley Development-Code Appendix B foâ€¢ additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev Applicant 17< Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) SM 9â‚¬n# 1-~44 Mailing Address \12-0 2, 1 3 Ta M pse- Ave- / ES+25 Faw K Phone (470) 564 - 9 9 21 Cell Phone @702-2-7 -2-211 pax (flo) 496- 9/73 Email +Acablo &ge,ef @)'~-OU.01" Applicant AA oivic- -6 4.~9 Mailing Address gâ‚¬,60 le 14Â· Bo< 6- Aird Phone (414 5-77 - 9%99 Cell Phone (9-10) 2,9 -7686 Fax (47& 577 - 99 Â¥4 Email -11Â»6,~33 Â£044*.4$44 9 44614aA, 626â€¢L, ConsultanVEngineer 4\446 6--s-e.r-~5 Mailing Address 7,0, 13 D, *34 ~i**~E 09 Im Â©9 Phone (470) 5 77 - C 9 0 / Cell Phone (9 74 4 1113 - 9 26 9 .2 L.V . 1 1 1 1 111 b 1 11 Fax (470) 9 7 1 - 1 5-9/ 01 JUN 27 all li M Email ~AM\# Al,9.\nob k AcJer-5 6 4.4 UL 1 6 =/ i iLJ f F APPLICATION FEES , li For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 334 5Â£04 314 n AppliCant PLEASE PFUNT: .A/1 6-k- 1\4Â£53 Signatures: fo Record Owner ~LÂ« 2-00-071 1<&,\ Date 6/4/09 11 11 1 Applicant 4 ~i-Â£ 114 5 5 .AL~Uâ‚¬44 Date ( et Ul 3 7 Contactinformation APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWDevCode.) I I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. ~ I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 33 4 Â·~ eal 3 D ~LM Applicant PLEASE PRINT: AAâ€¢,J U.- -[04Â·e: Ss Signatures: Record Owner C Lud Date 1 rinle-9 Applicant 1UUL. Date (el 47 767 .ALT>-SALA~~- 4 A. 1 v E Â©[60-VEE --11~ ~ ti Alli Alt a~~ JUN 27 3107 4 E ED'i Revised 10/13/06 r .1. h co 4-NhhAN h ANN 1- N â€ž-â€žr 10 N " ID ID 1.0 1.0 tO tO 0045900Â¤00"0 E 88 00 91- o w 00 00 00 00 00 r 00 00 00 00 00 60001*900000800000 NO00 .02000000000000 042 22:111 0 22#2 20 lil m (0 5 & RZE@ 5 @ 5 mo @ M 05 0- 0- 0- m c-3 0- 0-0- 0- a- 2 0- 0- 0 0 0 C- .cocom 0 % cou) Â£Â®2228~.322222=22 Â·t~ -35 0 u)O.Emuu)000 C) 0) 0 O LU 111 U.1 5 -1 U) Ill W ILI U.1 LU O W LU i i C 5 0 (D .C C O O 0 0 0 0 c c E 33 EN 3228* CDC).ch O h O LOW 6 2 2%*:@6 :49 13) 2-2 M' 9 EEgaza~ ~ ~tE ~,Ef28 p co 00 â„¢ 0 0 00 on o m O â€ž m r LOA CO O--4-091- 91-VUNVOr 0.- 0. 10 N O. > 0- 0 3 6 3 *See#~2=~~2~d~ b p A.c 12,0 â‚¬ o i > E' 3% irco25â‚¬28:zlEMGOig Alvin L. & Carol L. Blandin 80517 Wallace J. & Laurine Anna Burke Trust 80517 -2787 of ~~F~ki~s c/o Lambert Investments No. 1, LLC 134 2343 Jennifer Shinn 38BÂ©T tates Drive 0517 Motor Lodge, Inc. ho~~r~~1 Avenue Estes Park, olene Svancara 441 Lakefr n Estes Park, Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, elle-1 uoiBugul i Street Owner Owner 11 Address devy opuoo Nci 19 0 L-ZO da se}SEI JO Sieql.U!1 E. Carlson Motor Lodge c/o Richard Carlson & Joanna B. Harless Potzler Betty G. Potzler, William G. Potzler PROJECT STATISTICS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR i 25 OWNER In Seon John 1220 Big Thompson Estes Park, CO 80517 970-586-4421 DEVELOPER J The Santuary, LLC Mark Theiss 3266 H Bar G Road Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-9894 IE g fINE 1.1.1 LUX E-12 6 -1.0 gr GE < O- O- Cal A D LINE 703, F CO DRAWN BY: PJE SCALE: AS SHOWN JOB: 2007-111 DATE: 8-27-07 SHEET l tit IlY MULL, CHAIR 14 63 -1- , Aol 11 1 11 ~ SUBJECT PARCEL SHEET INDEX: VICINITY MAP (NTS) 1. COVER SHEET/NOTES 2. UTILITY & LANDSCAPE PLAN 3. GRADING, DRAINAGE, PHASING & PARKING PLAN OF NOISIA3@ 31Â¥0 011 '9Nlhl33NION 3d '1 13NN38 Z :908 OO '>lkIVd S31S3 XJ :Â¢Eftf:Z~41~Tpzg. 133HS hl3A00 SIAIRINIIAIOaNOO 92338IAIll 3H1 NO:I NÂ¥ld iN)I/\Id013ABa 2 X908 OO sels3 UO!S!A!Pqns depeo]409 8 101 4 ..W . - .=-,4.~ .... ::.- : - I .0 - . . . . I. ..... .. :. A I~- ~ *c~:445Â£,1'&.,~:~- ..A. :0 ... :.. A e - A . A ;. *9.:- '' 0 A ... :00 i,1 ..Â»,4 u I - 1 . . A: . ... .1 1 . A . A. 0 - . 2 , . I .- ... 6 A- - A . . ..A ... I. .1 ... A : e. ... A.. lA ...A ... . 1 DAD I .. . . . . : I . . .lili 1 0. A D A. A : ... . ... 1; I . 1 .... .A .... .:. A ...A A.A A D . .. ... . 0 .. .... - . - ... 0 :. A ..0 0. A ': . ... ..... A . .A .A A . .... . I . . A .A. .. :.A I .. AA . D :.. ..: . A . .0 . A . .A D ... A D . A e .AD .... . A .... . 0 0 . 0. . A A: : . ... .. .. A . .. .1 A lA . . ... A . ..: .A. . ..AD. ..A .. . . . - 7/m,5, ~ 1 - 0 0 -0 . . . . 1 I . .. I. - ... . 0: 0. .1 . .. . A. I .- '1 . 11 . I . ..... 0 . . . . . 0 1 A : 0 1 .....I- .. .. ... .A . ..1 1 ......... : A . . ... A A .. 4 ... I . :al .. : 0. .'. 0. . I. ... A ./ 1. ./ ... O . . 4 .A , A . I .. " ........ - . A. - I -0 0- I ..0 0 O - . A . 1 .. . ... . 1 .0 ... . I " D. : ADA.. I . I ... ' 11 0 1. , . .... . . . . 1 , 1 :.0 .. .0 4 4 " I I : 1 0. A . ... . : ....... ... . 0 - . A : ... . . . 0 0 ... ./. # , 1 .... ... ..... . ..: ... . A . . .C .. .. ......... 11 . . I . A- ..4 1 I I .... I .. . ... . 1 U . A . ... a I . .: A . .... 0. . ..1 0 I . ... ./ ..... ,. .... - I. I . .... . 0. ... 0 . I. 0 11 1 1 1, 0 ..... .. .A 0 0 0 1, 1 Â¢ 1, 1 1 -. . . ... . ..... 1 . I . I . . . . . A ... . 6 :I . . . ...0 0 .. . .:,0 0 0 ... ... .. 1 1 1% 1 --1 4>, N ./ ./ 1 ..20 .. ... .. . I= lA . . 1 ,+54444 I .D . I ./ ..0 .. .. . 00 . A . :; ... .. .... 0 0 ... , . A. . . A . . .. . A ....... 1 , ' ' , . : 0. ... . A D I ' , / i, , 0, 0 - A D .A 0 0 :0 . .0 . A .. : 2:22 I. . . . .. 1 . .. . .....0 A.... A , ..... A .A . e .. . .. :, 0 : A. .: .. 1 0 .0 ..... 0 = ...... .. A . A. :. 1 . .. .... . ... . A .. ~ECEIVE .. 41.11 - .... . . .. D ... I I 6- . A. A . A I . A . 0 . 1 A: 0. A I... .... --* I - L LEGEND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR . POWER POLE E ELECTRIC PEDESTAL THE TIMBERS CONDOMINIUMS ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL NEIGHBORING ZONED-A-ACCOMODATIONS WV M WATER VALVE /- HOME w ~ EX. WATER LOT 9 OF Â· <ZONED A-ACCOMODATION~ FIRE HYDRANT SUBDINISION LOT 1 OF Â® MANHOLE /- SERVICE GRAND ESTATES * SCHROEDER SUBDIVISION EXISTING TREES * CL 20' ESTES PARK GENERAL ~ - EX. 12" D.I. (N188Â° 29' 00"E) Â® WATER SERVICE EX. 6" D.I. IMPROVEMENT SEWER DISTRICT ~ 7 WATER LINE WATER LINE ~ (71 0 NO. 1,7/21/1970, BOOK ~ (111.18') 1437. PAGE 370' 9 OHE Q) Â© SEWER SERVICE // 14 ' OWE , OHE OPE 01 IC OHE 01 IE ~ HE 011[ OIl[ 4 -/1- 1 OWNER -W w /- T I T~ i ITI 00.00 MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS RELOCAT PED 1 , Â· ~t~ N88Â° 2~9' 00"E (NE38Â° zgg-22"E) - ---T- T-------- T- U w -11 In Seon John r BASIS OF BEARINGS --Ir-) --N N~88' -1*612- -1---=U--1 ----p +YÂ© 1220 Big Thompson A SHOWN - ill % ,-- - 10' ELECTRICAL 111.00 19 / (00.00) PLATTED OR DEEDED DIMENSIONS Estes Park, CO 80517 15' SSMH ~11?E~ 266.71' (266.80') -,XE tllMr13-OF-F-- DEVELOPER EX. RIM=7579.45 Â·6 15 - 1-OCATTURI-73- - - B"-PP - \ SETBACK BK 1848 ~ 0276 END. #4 REBAR 8-b_ _ EASEMENT, EXACT \_ _ A-- - - - - --BED~7~-1:Ji. 1Â·611*-EASE*NT 970-586-4421 1 NEW RIM=7579.60 1 |'\~~ 10-, 2, A>- UTILITY EASEMENT =--BROPÂ©S@[> *ELEPHONE -E-C DISTURBANCE - -~-~ ~ PLAT 4#- ~t~- -7-/ BE SHOWN ON FINAL 1315 1848 PG 0276 _-_~ ~ YELLOW CAP, Mark Theiss 11'Obk / 663/ ~ - - 3 1-/ ~ 1 1 4 -PROPOSED TELEPHON~ 3266 H Bar G Road O END. #4 REBAR W/ ILLEGIBLE The Santuary, LLC IL' lili , 7-----G>(Si PROPOSED 8" DIP PROPOSED SINGLE 1,-- 1 PROPOSED PAD LIGHTED ENTRY SIGN j ~411\.1~/00,001' / 1 4. Estes Park, CO 80517 W/ ADDRESSES ~ 9 MOUNT TRAINISFORMER . -~> END. #4 REBAR W/ YELLOW CAP, 970-577-9894 ->milt;i-111 ~ - WATER MAIN, BUILDING 2 PHASE ELECTRIC, 4' BURY 1 1 440/4, r _ _ +YO / 6'MINBURY A *- - 20' WATERLINE UNITS A-C GAS/ELECTRIC METERS n 09 LS#15760 EASEMENT, EXACT lim GAS/ELECTRIC,96:RS~ ~ (77.18') () END. 3/4" PIPE EM (N35Â° 41' 46"E) e X-\ \ L)CATION TO BE SHOWN E ALL DECKS SHALL BE -J Â©11~ ON FINAL PLAT SEWER 1 .1 Ft LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS/ -J CM - MANHOLE S-1 20' N (2 1< 45Â° 8" BEND RIM=7569,65 -3 WATERLINE - s SET #4 REBAR W/ CAP STAMPED ef â€ž O r- / / 44-10" . W/ THRUST INV OUT=7566.50 ~ EASEMENT 41* / LS 29415 1.0 = U' Z 1 BLOCKS ~ ~i -~t It, - LU (SlÂ° 12' 00"E) 1 ~ |~ ~_ 8" VCP SEWER 0 1. 1 4% 41-1 L--6 UILDING . a- 00 & h ./6 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE u.1 - O -0 C) (198.02') 1 LINE Â«D 1 Â® IL,z 11*t-\ 0// I O. ~ lai \ / ' 1 1 1,1 1 - t. 144 C"frial -4 - U KITS A- C J /~9 ' FF NlÂ° 12' 55"W- ~ ~ ~~ - GAS METERS -- ----1--1-7--- ' '~ >t &*h*-221~ 2- g ,< 7" PI~ ~~4Â¥ Â«D GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT 03* - 198.12' b \ 42 4-15~~- 9 /#/ - UJ â‚¬4 1 -1 ti S 1 0Â° 58' 06"W ~Eg?tru ZONED E-1 -EÂ«f___23 2 ~ 11 14 ( \\ -- M._L- W , 12" pp LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT ez as-2.- / / 74 42~ *42,k,k CE ADA UNIT C (525- s ul In X = E R < 1 1-87.86' O t'rl ~I i _1 -1 ----- V 1 5*0 - --S ~0" SDR.35- @1.Â°3.~ -,7- \&34*/6 4 10' - u<OU)foN 0 6/1 liu) LIMITS OF L LIMITS OF (Nl V 04' 46"E) VIi r gg_2of] - sl<~ th / / / - 1*' DISTURBANCE h /187 923 DISTURBANCE : E 3 1 0. J E Od EXTERIOR LIGHTING (TYP) -41*NE 4 BLDG C. ZONED A-ACCOMODATIONS 4 0- CL U.1 0. C) BLOCKS MC ~-- SETBACK -- U, 9 1 l GAS ~ .{ r fl~.,13* , EX. 12" D.I. <0 - '111 1 1 1 muD 1 â„¢0223 till GC â‚¬CD - ~ LOT 2 OF CO 41 14 +Il)41 elli GAS/ELECTRIC METERS -|~' WATE~ SCHROEDER SUBDIVISION N 6 GC @ WATER LINE 0 1 6 1 ALL CONCRETE PADS SHALL 0 1 @ 1 D ~ / 20' WATERLINE BE LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT C E b,Q -_~-~ L#CATION TO BE SHOWN r- SEWER MANHOLE- / EASEMENT, EXACT ZA S-2 BUILDING 1 I.9, RIM=7571.18 EASEMENT, EXACT ; ON FINAL PLAT LO 0% i: *44.41 INV OUT=7565.40 SHOWN ON FINAL 20 40 60 FE.ip"T,1 UNITS A- c -tw ~e INV IN=7565.60 LOCATION TO BE -- -) -11 1~1 1 424- 0.- 00 37.5' s PLAT ~21" PeÂ« 10* >n \ \ ROW PROPOSED ~ 1 |~ 3~ (--- SEWER BUILDING 5 IRRIGATION TAP y/' 20' MANHOLE S-3 LIMITS OF SCALE: 1"= 20' 0 ZO Y-4 ROW EX. ~ * UTILITY EASEMENT 0).13 \ RIM=7565.66 UNITS A-C 4" SDR- 35 1-1 DISTURBANCE - EX. OVERHEAD 6& \ 1 2ll~44/ip,PAÂ»~Â» p BK 1848 PG 0276 GC INV IN=7564.39 LOT 3 OF PRIVATE SEWER LINE - 9/ 1 7011 INV OUT=7560.33 @ 2% m n. . 1 CATV TO BE RELOCATED 15' ELECTRIC METERS LAIr- CLUSTER OF 7" CO N %%0 L UNDERGROUND AS SHOWN BLDG FOR BLDG 1 & u' 47 SCHROEDER SUBDIVISION % /'1 9. t4x ,-__-_ip.~ --*. 0 PROPOSED CONCRETE PÂ» 14 0 SETBACK ENTRY SIGN Â»,4 U.9, Â»OCE,) ..d\\|),1//240-â„¢E.22. w 0 9 4" pp ~64Â· AND SMALLER - CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK -*- ZONED A-ACCOMODATIONS e 2-1~1% \- 13 1 4 7,>30 7.1.-9 LU CD TREES SAWCUT LINE - - GC 17====-I- --. - ---2---7/l \1/-1-X /1/ =- EX. EOA - -.~ - .gi"*I--///16 99"*4P ..4. ADJACENT PARK;NG-LOTiID ~ d U) F LU ~,1/.- FLOWLINE ----Nk\~ 1-i \\PP 33',Â«j'~ ~~~ 8 "-FF- 4 1 PP " 8' CONCRETE - \\.f I ida jut .di - I * I 1*>1 OSED TELEPHONE 15' PP *54Â¥31 BUILDING 4 \\ fr \ 1 4,4~'Ppee (-720 SIDEWALK ~ s <07-- L#k----3+* 0 1 (GE~. pp --3~U- DECKS (TYP) 464. 133 TiÂ·r--------~-31 9'.42 11.mF EX. 12" D.I. E X- NL 4 ' SDR-35 4 ~00~ 81' PP 10 1 *- r -Jalms 67,4 4 ~,643 0 ler *Â·19 ra,i 203.42' ~~ '4k * 04282 48~0Â©) 16 - 2-7, -GAS/ELECTRIC METERS g WATER LINE ~ OPOSED -- 588' 46' 14"W (203.51') ////01 4 UNDERGROUND ELECTRiC PRIVATE SEWER LINEP SERVICE ----- . BLDG ~k - ~ ZONED E-1 -ESTATE <) @ 2% min. . - I Sâ‚¬IBACK~ - 25' SSMH EW-LUNCC - EX. RIM=7563.48\ 0 L 8" VCP SEWER LOT 12 OF NEWRIM=7566.00 1.1991 PROPOSED TELEPHONE r /91. PINED]ityp S- MAIN @ 0.40% INV IN=7560.90 \ SSMH GRAND ESTATES -5" pp N..~.S \ /1 INV OUT=7560.80 ~ RIM=7568.74 20' SUBDIVISION INV IN=7559.91 - DISTRICT 1- LIMITS OF .a-I 1" 99 1 1,11 INV OUT=7559.81 BUFFER DISTURBANCE -X .1 24' 20' LANDSCAPE COST ESTIMATE \ Â«0 EX. 4" D.I. - UTILITY EASEMENT '21'fz 00. 70272 -.- WATER LINE BK 1848 PG 027p 15 $480 $7,200 EVERGREEN TREES 8' TALL Â» -X-XNX UTILITY EASEMENT 14 $360 $5,040 EVERGREEN TREES 6' TALL 1 1Â£ pp 6 1 1 BK 1848 PG 0276 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 4 $75 $300 DECIDUOUS TREES 2" CALIF. \4\- L 1. 28 TREES AND 39 SHRUBS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY ON THE SOUTH. 3 $200 $600 DECIDUOUS TREES 4" CALIP. 1. ~ 1 /1 Â«xx ' ~(N23' 49' 58"E) 2. NO DISTRICT BOUNDARY IS REQUIRED ON THE EAST DUE TO THE EXISTING TREES IN THIS AREA AND LACK OF DEVELOPMENT 92 $50/ea $4,784 5 GALLON SHUBS .0 KN IN THIS AREA. 1 $15,000 $15,000 DRIP IRRIGATION t.k-4 7, 8 1.04 ,(88.88') 3. 5 TREES AND 13 SHRUBS ARE REQUIRED ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. 04' 0\ XX L 8" VCP SEWER -- BUFFER 4. 2 SIGNIFICANT CONIFEROUS TREES WILL BE REMOVED REQUIRING 4 TO BE PLANTED. $32,924 TOTAL 16"- -- DISTRICT 5. 30 CONIFEROUS 8' TALL OR BIGGER WILL BE PRESERVED THUS COUNTING FOR THE EXTRA 4 REQUIRED. MAIN @0.40% 4-02 NX\\ 4 >Al 25' DRAWN BY: PJB 6. ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE 5 GALLON SIZE OR BIGGER. LANDSCAPING LEGEND: QTY: NEIGHBORING 25' ~ ~ KNX 7 4 40/0/- BUILDING SCALE: AS SHOWN 7. 50% OF DECIDUOUS TREES ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE SHALL BE 2" CALIPER AND 50% SHALL BE 4" CALIPER. +0,6 TREE (DECIDUOUS)-ASPEN-POPULUS TREMULOIDES, CLUSTER 3 0-H HOME BUILDING +0 8 \ / // ../ SETBACK 8. 50% OF THE CONIFEROUS TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT BOUNDARY BUFFER SHALL BE 6' TALL AND 50% tu SETBACK JOB: 2007-111 ZONE-D E-1-ESTATE SHALL BE 8' TALL. SHRUB (CONIFER)-TABLE TOP BLUE JUNIPER -JUNIPERUS 29 8-27-07 - DATE: GENERAL NOTE: G SCOPULORUM ZONED E- 1-ESTATE~~iJ) TRACT 1 JOHNSON RESUB SHEET 1. ALL ADDRESS SIGNS SHALL BE LIT. 4+ SHRUB (DECIDUOUS)-NATIVE POTENTILLA-POTENTILLA -7 SSMH OF LOT 14 GRAND LANDSCAPING NOTES: W FRUTICOSA 63 LOT 12 OF L RIM=7568.70 ESTATES 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE AUTOMATIC DRIP IRRIGATED. GRAND ESTATES DISTRICT INV IN=7561.95 2. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. * TREE (DECIDUOUS)-SHUBERT CHOKE CHERRY-PRUNIUS BUFFER 1/ INV OUT=7561.85 ADDITION 3. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULAR IRRIGATING, PRUNING, WEEDING, MOWING, FERTILIZING, AND VIRGINIANA "SHUBERT" 4 S-UBDIVISION 20' ESTES PARK GENERAL / / REPLACEMENT OF PLANTS IN POOR CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. IMPROVEMENT SEWER DISTRICT J / 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NUMBER 1 GRADE AND ~ TREE (CONIFERS)-DOUG FIR-PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII 13 NO. 1, 7/21/1970, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE QUALITY STANDARDS OF THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, TITLE 35, ARTICLE 26, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. ~ BOOK 1437. PAGE 370' 5. ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED OR GUYED AND FENCED TO PROTECT FROM WILDLIFE DAMAGE. "' TREE (CONIIFERS)-COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE-PICEA PUNGEKIS g , 6. NO TREES SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 5 FEET OF WATER AND SEWER MAINS. =.1.2- 7, NO PLANTS THAT GROW TALLER THAN 6 INCHES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 3 FEET OF FIRE HYDRANTS. ~ TREE (CONIIFERS)-BRISTLECONIE PINE-PINUS ARISTATA 7 - OF I r NOISIA3@ 31Va *Id MON,9 L 1 11AI 00 Ski 3H1 BO=I NÂ¥ld 1NBIAId013A30 NÂ¥ld EdÂ¥0SaNÂ¥1 9 Ailliln UO!9!A!Pqns depe03406 Â£ 101 4 Dumpster Enclosure For "The Timbers of Estes" DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP FOR LEGEND ' THE TIMBERS CONDOMINIUMS POWER POLE 1 1 I * LIGHT POLE 9 1 1 CD ./ / A Z --lill -- $*-*i- -1---- *.Ii-l. Ill-- -I--il- ---1- --- --i E ELECTRIC PEDESTAL i / \ h ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER | < TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 1- ------- WATER VALVE 1 1 / -- ----- WV -- ~/ /~ ~ FIRE HYDRANT ---- 1 + 7'-3" / f ~ STA 0+00 4- * Â® MANHOLE 0 4 / 1 r- 24" FES \ 0 1 / 1 -\ INV IN=7571.00 ' \~ 1 8 WATER WELL OWNER NOTES: STA O+10 1 In Seon John l j * - i 1220 Big Thompson 1 Cedar sided sheilding dumpster enclosed on all foursides. 1 m 1 STORM MANHOLE 1 EXISTING TREES 2. Color to be congurent with "The Timbers" / 1 1 1 F- RIM=7564.61 - -- -- - - \3 Estes Park, CO 80517 3. 3" thick concrete pad for dumpster with 1 % slope towards drive. / 1 \\ INV IN=7564.65 SWALE 'B' 970-586-4421 4. Enclosure shall be 5' deep. %1 1 1 6 1 INV OUT=7564.45 1 Â« ~ ~ /- SEE DRAINAGE REPORT (1488Â° 29' 00"E) 1 SHRUBS ~ ~ FOR CALCULATIONS (111.18') SWALE 'C' 1 \ A STAKE The Santuary, LLC DEVELOPER , 10 1 SEE DRAINAGE REPORT / PHASE 5 15' 1 \ / Mark Theiss ~ ~ . PHASE 2 ~ ~ ~~ FOR CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE i \ i Â«2 r \ 3266 H Bar G Road i \ EASEMENT, EXACT ~ 1 Â·~_~ ~ f 1 711 .- '-BASIS OF BEARINGS LOCATION TO BE SHOWN N88 18' 13"E 00.00 MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS r R72' Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-9894 TRANSITION INTO -1/ -- -~ ON FINAL PLAT 1-1 - .... - 1 1 CURB AND GUTTER 1 2,%41 / ' l Â· / \~ _ . N.0-i_29' 00"E (NE~~ 29', 00"E) ~ r-- - ;~ - 111.00' -\---1---Â»J . . 266.71 '-(266.80')7 - -/--------- -Liks*<--1-phE:Jit:'C__ (00.00) PLATTED OR DEEDED DIMENSIONS -1 1 Â« TRAWÂ·y- CONâ‚¬kETE~| --3-------- SOG SLAB ON GRADE J E SIGLIJ~NACNE--y till \11 / 0. LINE, 450' TO NORTH / 1 2.27 & r T.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION - -1 0 SEE XSEC C ~ 0--4 ~ - 118' -=-=47 1 F. F. FINISH FLOOR -1 0 e d 1/\ /0 /03 / - 11 -4 - U.1 u) i \l \\ 1 \ '7,1 1 Â»439 - \ 49 09 CE 0- 00 h SIGHT DISTANCE R20' -91 141 472 --=-4-1- ~ / ..- ~ -- LINE, 334' TO SOUTH 0*,4 03 SPOT ELEVATION U.1 0 0 0 Z F. F.=7571.00 \ 1 HANDICAP RAMP ~ 4' CONCRETE PAN \ \ ' \\ 1~ 50 214, ..~ 5,1 / 60 (77.18') EOA=EDGE OF ASPHALT Z 1- . a. SEE DETAIL 707 ON 419 - 1 SIDEWAEK i)' 1 65LF OF 18" ADS 43' 1 1 3 . COVER SHEET - STORM PIPE @4.15%, ~~ ~18<PP tÂ»>R 1 0' ~-1912, , 1 4 5 \ - (N35' 41' 46"E) FL=FLOW LINE U.1 1- =.C fp-z~-' 4 ~--> - ~1~14' 1 161~ 1 - LILI TOW=TOP OF WALL -9 A.4 \\ 4 \ / 1 62 0% . f f /~ BOW=BOTTOM OF WALL (0 z 2/ r SEE STORM PROFILE 6 LP=LOW POINT \ 1 V (3) - In 1 , 1 m m M HP=HIGH POiNT r'~i., - 1% 6 HANDICAP RAMP \ 1 ~3<, 0,~ ~ _ C<< \ u,1 X 16 h. 2 % 1 ~4,10" ~~~ TC=TOP OF CURB a = (Sl 12' 00"E) i v a SEE DETAIL 707 ON (198.02') COVER SHEET :/ Â·44 3 ~ 906*96~600 6~ i~Ng' RP E 62 0@4 -1 91 _ 1- 76 NlÂ° 12' 55"W- 51* v /Ap/1*611,~11 - F F *151 GFBAG 23.... ~ 198.12'--' <00~0~ 1124 1 1 ''f r -- 14 4- - 1 -1- dii t>,4,3205 +80 3gifir,> 1 F 5 -/ 2,4>/A\M' \ C o. a ul a. a, J 4 0 U) m ,- 8 k /T '. '4Â« RS' F 92' _j ~ SAWCUT AND PATCH 5-E / R2' \ - U-/ 11 ' 1 1 , . 6-3> '64. 06Â«RETE PAN X7':,1- - 18" OF EXISTING ASPHALT. 1 f 1 --3> Â»Â« 12" PP~*~s . e ,~<0,_S10Â° 58' 06'W hi 0 87.86' ~ ~~pl ~ ~- 4' CONCRETE PAN 161 * $-tr 44/0.00 11411Â° 04' 46"E) INSTALL CONCRETE CURB -/.7 N <5 1191 6, .99* N GUTTER PER CROSS SECTION . , // l ~ 45.- 0 9/ i 2.<.7WbDI ON COVER SHEET ~ F. F. =7572.00 ./ 13' I'l~~~i~ 1- 1 11% B Il ,0'*11) 4, - 4 0- 1 LO 2, 4 'yi f 'rkÂ»spl / 1 594 *4Â»>--1-i- 1 4 -412-01-i-7,91 \ 4,>-e . tiCI* , \ B f\/\ \ 1 1 0 0 41 1 ,., p 0 00 / - 1/~ 1 -Â©1 /221Â»2'-7 571 -4 L-2.1' 1 0 20 40 60 PHASE 1 ~ u ); 1 ~ Â§419 -i liff CN -20 2 1 .<0 0 ~\ 44 Z O to Â¥2/ r- 00 F. F.=7572.00 20' --- SCALE: 1"= 20' 0 -2 SIDEWAL -*o, DRAINAGE 1 j /1-1 / \\ \4\4/ 0 1898 YD-3 CUT TO BE SHOWN ON FINAL 13'@~ / 21 ~" PA ~11'~10 4 Ii~W 7 ~5' I.L.1 90' EASEMENT, EXACT LOCATION , / (-z RU 1 -. co 1104\\\ Â«90* mla'/ / 05 0- --- -- I \ 1253 YD-3 FILL 11 -9/ / 1 .323 1 1 CO m p â€¢ 645 YD-3 EXPORT i '' , c) A 1 -4.- '/ 1 (\ 10 _ --- V - ,-90' -x j~f , 1 ~ 1 =30-J~~d- ~'111 PHASE 3 \ CUT/FILL CALCS DO NOT CONSIDER SHRINK/SWELL OR STRIPPING OF ~ -3 1 / 1 111% 4 F. F.=7571.50 ~.F.=7571.50 F.F.=7570.31> ) i~~,*0*32 TOPSOIL. 1 -/ F. F.=7570.00 - 4 STA 1+65/ %*UV/////, .14 23' bet h 20 RIM=7567.29 /-- CUT/FILL CALCS DO NOT CONSIDER PLACING ANY FILL BELOW BLDG 5. ~ / h =1<://///// ..... 6 1 ~~L)*ti pi. INV IN=7564.66 \ J CUT/FILL CALCS DO NOT CONSIDER PAVEMENT THICKNESS, BASE | -75-7 - .:~6<le ~ MATERIAL THICKNESS, OR SLAB THICKNESS. THEY ARE VOLUMES TAKEN , s: *~,AUT \ L : AM ' VA ->/ N ~vy/m 4.-,55-~ FROM EXISTING GROUND TO FINISH FLOOR/GRADE. '644 '' k%k./* SEE STORM PROFILE_vu~ ~4~ t# 936 ,5-2*I~9x~- *-- , r K. ---*-Sk ?9& V -:7Â·â€¢En.-I?V I 1 log NOTES: 9./ t ~_0-<1570--~~ ~52~~ r---77-1--*---- 1 1 \ \Q9~A . 96- '/ el - , 9 PPI ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND DETENTION POND SHALL BE 4 1.12=* --rt CONSIDERED GENERAL COMMON ELEMENTS AND SHALL BE /3,>01 U 1 O- i \ 49' 5-1.. - 7575.00 MAINTAINED BY THE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. L F.F.6 \ /9/1+111\\\\Ft Â® \\ 7578.00 3-02-42'=1 - & 919: Â· . , 4,88Â° ' 001 , c.- . , i - ,â€ž-it .' -, \ I / 0 '1 0&11, 7.12 1 6.9. -- . , ~ .Bes-1 \ - \ 1 0- \ - 29, S> - )4 iliMt4*,1/0 *104. 0 lit 5881 46' 14"W 1 / Il- P ~- \_-a -; ' DRAINAGE ./ d / /' ~ j -~27 7Â« \ .--I / EASEMENT, EXACT / DETENTION POND 'A' *81 1~23-*9" ft -- \Â» E m STA 1 +80 / ~ REQD 10-YR VOLUME=2446CF \ \ WO /'.4-, â€¢ T=TOP WIDTH r / LOCATION TO BE SHOWN ON FINAL PLAT,/ 18" FES ~ /10-YR VOLUME PROVIDED=2446CF A-A BURIED SEEDED RIPRAP*00 1 &34-49 - ------%- ~ F=FREEBOARD INV OUT=7563.72 f REQD 100-YR VOLUME=1659CF , -4 1 X > FOR OVERFLOW 40* N --2523 / PROTECTION \ . < _ "'Pp 1.1..1 , i / WQCV WSEL=7563.83 / li, , REQD WQCV=1311(F , J IJ ~ RIPRAP B.ED Â»/ TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED=3778(F ' / / , 5*=12' l 10-YR WSEL=7564.83 -- ABOVE GRADE RIPRAP BED . ~ 1 31 ...., r PP 0 \\ \\ Al ae__-1 i Y=WATER DEPTH 011]guy' 1' ,, ~ < / / ~ . SEE OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAILS // SWALE 'A' 1 "4 (36 1 \\ 11 ~rL,i,_i,4 4=r=Lu--:iu--,i:-i, -Ilk=111 22 / IN DRAINAGE REPORT ~ ~ SEE DRAINAGE REPORT ~ < PHA St 4//,. \ \ FOR CALCULATIONS \(247 ~dOO~b~- - \ 15,70\ \ DRAWN BY: PJB Z l U= ' laIELLF'l IELAUELLSI ELLHEII I=I Ii=I l lal IB I ELUE / A -~'.WL]LEI'l==Ill Il=||Bil=Q,ElEW-url.&=P / POND SHALL BE BUILT WITH PHASE 1~7' \\ - -- 1 B= -/ 1 \ \ --- SCALE: -- 1. 1 1 1 1 1 - *$ UN \ BOTTOM WIDTH '1 / / -- - hw pp \ 96% N // \ JOB: 2007-111 1 1 SWALE SECTION , / / / / 1 1 \ . \ --* ~(N23 49' 58"E) / / x T SHEET t//,\ DATE: 1 1 /1 1 \ i MIL -- 00 X- (88.88') 8-27-07 1 f \ OPEN CHANNELS / / ~ / 41+ - 11 1 \ 6 SWALE AA SWALE BB SWALE CC SWALE DD / . i \ - 1 . 1 / 1 / / 11 \\ B= 0.1ft 0.1 FT 2ft 41 / / Zl =11# 3# 3ft 10ft 3/ / / / / 3/ A \\\Nh %\0 Z2= 11ft 3ft 3ft 10ft // / ~ ... -- 414 1 F= 1ft 1ft 1 ft lit /-/ ~ - -/4 Y= 1.00ft 0.65# 0.65ft / / / / f /\\\ -- /4 \ \ L T= 22.111 4.OFT 5.90ft 14 RA FLOW= 69.19cfs 17.29cfs 18.97cfs 27 74(fs l ~ Â· , ' - / / X 13 OF 1 , 18 NOISI/\3M x, t691'.ZLS OZ 2 1.90 3 >QIÂ¥d SINAINIIN I/\Ill )Hl hIO=I NÂ¥ld 1NB NÂ¥ld ONI>IhIVd 9 'ONISVHd '9NICIVE:19 S3 UO!SiA!Pqns Jepe03409 f -~ Snugglers Cove Development Plan (DP 07-12) ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~I,90 Estes Park, CO 80517 - - Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: September 18,2007 E ww k 30 REOUEST: Approval to build two new - OXPA__.p.oca_ .,,- USFS ' "reunion cal*ns" and six new guest cabins at 5%#tx~17: -/ r#L_[34 17 the YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center. .1 Ax*y 36 3, LOCATION: TBD Snugglers Cove 1,/btrlkair, USFS N*oral - Drive/Court, within the unincorporated Estes 6 valley (refer to aerial photo below). 1.5 USFS FM\F APPLICANT/OWNER: YMCA of the 1 Boulc~y Rockies Estes Park Center STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer/Consultant: Cornerstone Engineering (Mike Todd), 586-2458 Parcel Number: 3404200022 Development Area: 600 acres (+/-) Number of Lots: One Existing Land Use: Accommodations Proposed Land Use: Same Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations Adjacent Zoning- East:: "RE" Rural Estate North: "O" Open (Larimer County designation) West:: "O" Open (Larimer County South: "E-1" Estate, "A-1" designation) Accommodations Adjacent Land Uses- East: Single-family residential North: Rocky Mountain National Park West: Rocky Mountain National Park South: Single-family residential Services- Water: Private system Sewer: Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer r PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to build six new guest cabins and two new "reunion cabins" at the YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center. All development will be in the same general location, with a new interior road system providing shared access from Mesa Drive. The guest cabins are four bedrooms and intended to be rented by families on vacation, whereas the reunion cabins are eight-bedrooms and intended to serve extended families. 1 BAr ..i, ' I. , 4141 =ti?'3#'*11**,1 : 1 1,111 1, 07'k.,~ ~ 14 4 - :. ej~ 41.FZ; ".Â· ~41 ' ,' -I./. 4. : Mn'- C . . 11 *76 - 9Â§$1'11 ..,7.-- li 3.- Â·Â·gte REVIEW CRITERIA: This development plan is subject to applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Zoning Requirements. This proposal complies with land use, density, impervious coverage, setback, and pedestrian linkage requirements. YMCA of the Roc/des Master Plan. The Larimer County Board of County Commissioners approved the YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan in March 2007. This plan outlined future development of the YMCA grounds, and included the following conditions that are required with this development proposal: Page #2 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 = 14 I , â€¢ Street signs shall be mounted at a standard height and have reflective lettering to be visible at night from Tunnel Road all the way to the proposed development. The method of accomplishing this should be included on the development plan. â€¢ All new development shall be addressed in accordance with Larimer County addressing policies. â€¢ An exclusive southbound right turn lane shall be constructed or guaranteed at the Tunnel Road-Kallenberg Drive intersection (design subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering). These are conditions of approval set forth in the Master Plan, and are included in this report for reference. . 9 Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2.D requires the Decision Making Body approve proposed Limits of Disturbance for all development plans. This section includes criteria for establishing Limits of Disturbance. It is Staff's opinion the proposed LOD meet these criteria. Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance Standards" applies to this proposal. No grading, excavation or tree/vegetation removal shall be permitted, whether to provide for a building site, for on-site utilities or services or for any roads or driveways, before issuance of a building permit. The proposed slope along the western edge of the parking lot requires special consideratioi per Section 7.2. Method of accomplishing revegetation (i.e. erosion mats, deep rooting plants) shall be included on the plan. Tree and Vegetation Protection. Existing trees to remain shall be fenced for protection prior to any site work. The area of tree protection fencing should be clearly delineated on the development plan. Tree protection fencing shall comply with standards set forth in Appendix D.VIII. Landscaping and Buffers. The proposed landscaping plan satisfies code requirements. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. No lighting fixture shall be higher than fifteen feet above ground. This includes parking lot and security lighting. A lighting "cut sheet" will need to be submitted for Staffreview prior to issuance of first building permit. Off-Street Parking and Loading. This proposal requires 28 parking stalls; 34 are proposed. The plan should be amended to reflect this requirement. Page #3 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 , Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Electric. All electric service is to be placed underground. Drainage/Water Quali<y Management. All required drainage facilities shall be installed and accepted in accordance with Section 7.12.F, which allows 25% of building permits to be issued prior installation of the drainage facilities. Sanitao Sewer. The YMCA has a private collection system that connects to the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Water. Water will be provided through the YMCA's private water system. The YMCA has recently invested in "upgrades" to their private water system. These include construction of two new water storage tanks and a new water treatment plant (a membrane plant, very similar to the one the Town is planning on building next year). Furthermore, the YMCA has provided documentation to water rights adequate to support this and future development. - Fire Protection. New fire hydrants will be installed, and must be in place prior to issuance of a building permit. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Larimer County Engineering has noted "the design is feasible and can be in general compliance with [the] YMCA Master Plan and Engineering criteria for the Estes Valley Planning Area." Light and Power has standard comments regarding costs, as-built plans, and electrical plans. Upper Thompson Sanitation District had comments regarding need for a fixture count for billing purposes, and also had recommendations for the YMCA regarding the private service line collection system. Public Workw. The Light and Power Department had general comments regarding installation of electrical infrastructure. Town Attorney H/hite had comments regarding a minor change to the owner's statement. Page #4 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 , Building Department. The Building Department has noted the proposed reunion cabins will need to be sprinkled. Conduits. Per Section 7.13, "conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be screened, covered or painted to minimize visual impacts." Street Names. One of the street names will need to be changed. The Larimer County "Rules of the Streets" requires unique road names. A different suffix does not make a name unique. Development Construction Permit. The Larimer County Engineering Department will require a Development Construction Permit before issuance of permits. The applicant should contact Larimer County Engineering (Matt Johnson) as soon as possible to coordinate. Other. The following changes to the plan should be made: 1) Location of street signs and street sign specifications shall be shown on the plat. 2) The ADA route shall be designed to meet federal standards (slope and width of sidewalk ramps). 3) Details ofthe sediment filtration pond shall be included on the plan, and shall be subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. The applicant should carefully review the Staff report, which contains several references to Code requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could lead to a delay in issuance ofbuilding permits or certificates of occupancy. 2. If all recommended conditions of approval are required, the development plan will comply with all applicable standards set forth in this Code. 3. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the YMCA Master Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for the development plan. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed "Snugglers Cove" Development Plan 07-12 CONDITIONAL TO: 1. A Development Construction Permit is required through the Larimer County Engineering Department prior to issuance ofbuilding permits. Page #5 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 1 2. Compliance with memo from Traci Downs to Dave Shirk dated September 6, 2007. 3. Compliance with memo from Greg Sievers and Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 23,2007. 4. The owner's statement shall be revised to reference Larimer County instead of the Town of Estes Park. 5. The proposed slope along the western edge of the parking lot requires special consideration, per Section 7.2. Method of accomplishing revegetation (i.e. erosion mats, deep rooting plants) shall be included on the plan. 6. Street names shall be changed to conform to Larimer County street naming standards. 7. Location of street signs and street sign specifications shall be shown on the plat. 8. The ADA route shall be designed to meet federal standards (slope and width of sidewalk ramps). 9. Details of the sediment filtration pond shall be included on the plan, and shall be subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move APPROVAL of Development Plan 07-12 "Snugglers Cove" with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENIAL: 1 move DISAPPROVAL of Development Plan 07-12 because... (state reason for denial -findings). CONTINUANCE: 1 move to continue Development Plan 07-12 because ... (stgte reasonfor continuance -findings). Page #6 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAIUMER ~COUNTY - FAX (970) 498-7986 Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Traci Downs, Development Review Services DATE: September 6,2007 SUBJECT: YMCA of the Rockies Snugglers Cove - Estes Valley Planning Area Proiect Description/Background: YMCA of the Rockies is at 2515 Tunnel Road, also known as Spur 66. The YMCA has an approved master plan for their community which provides an approximate 20 year outlook for the site. The master plan is conceptual in nature and primarily serves to address strategies to better consider architecture, pedestrian and vehicle circulation, roads, parking, landscaping and irrigation, signage, lighting, environmental issues, stormwater management, accessibility, and open space. Consistent with the Master Plan, the YMCA is now proposing the Snugglers Cove Development, which will include 6 new single family cabins and 2 reunion buildings. All new structures will have access from Mesa Drive, which is an existing internal road serving portions of the YMCA Campus. The new access will be paved from Mesa Drive to the Reunion Buildings. Beyond the Reunion buildings, the access road serving the cabins will be an all-weather surface gravel road. The parking areas for the Reunion Buildings will be paved. Comments: 1. Based on the traffic memorandum provided by Matt Delich, dated December 13, 2006, an exclusive southbound right turn lane is already needed at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection. In addition, as a condition of approval of the master plan, any new traffic generating phase of development will require this improvement to be constructed. The submitted information did not include any commitments or information on this issue. The requirement to design and collateralize these improvements to Spur 66 prior to the certificate of occupancy of the first reunion cabin needs to be a condition of approval. This requirement should also be placed as a condition on the building permit for the first reunion cabin. The final and detailed design for the improvements needs to include all applicable submittal requirements listed in Chapter 3 of the LCRARS. 2. Since Condition #18 of the YMCA Master Plan does not clearly state the date when the southbound right turn must be completed at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection, a condition of approval of this application shall be that the right turn at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection must be completed by December 31, 2009. This time frame is consistent with Section 10.5.K of the EVDC. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc MITIEDJO-EXCELLENCE , 3. A geotechnical report and associated pavement design will be required with the design of the turn lane on Spur 66. The report and pavement design shall meet the requirements stated in Chapter 5 of the LCRARS, which discusses the County geotechnical and pavement design standards, All calculations, assumptions, and parameters used should be included in the report. 4. We also highly recommend that the applicant hires a geotechnical engineer to prepare a geotechnical report and associated pavement design for the onsite paving to minimize premature failure of the pavement and decrease maintenance costs in the future. Staff would like a copy of the analysis and pavement design for our files. 5. The submitted information states that a 3 inch gravel drive is proposed to serve the cabins. To provide a more stable and durable road, this specification needs to be changed on the plans to require at least 4 inches of CDOT Class 5 or 6 adequately compacted aggregate road base. 6. To assess the additional trip generation rate generated by this development, we will ask that an addendum to the traffic impact memorandum provided by Matt Delich, dated December 13, 2006 is submitted. As part of the memorandum, sight distance shall be evaluated and confirmed to meet the minimum County standards specified in Chapter 4 of the LCRARS. 7. The access roads are up 1,000 feet long dead end roads without-a second point of access. In addition, there is limited area for a fire truck to turn around at the terminus of the roads. Given this, a cul-de- sac bulb that can accommodate an emergency vehicle shall be provided at the end of each access road. Lastly, the Estes Park Fire Protection District shall have the opportunity to review the proposed building and internal street layout to ensure that it will also be adequate for their purposes. 8. A more detailed drainage and erosion control report and associated plan will need to be submitted with the final submittal. However, the preliminary/Conceptual drainage report and plan does address the key drainage and erosion control issues and is therefore acceptable for preliminary approval. The report discusses two proposed detention ponds with water quality outlets and several other erosion control best management practices for the site. With the final report, Staff will expect that the drainage design and report will have additional information and clarification on how the design incorporates the YMCA Drainage Master Plan Goals of protecting the roadways and infrastructure for the 25- year rain event and collecting and retaining the first inch of rainfall in the detention ponds. The proposed roadside swale and culvert sizing may need to be enlarged to account for these criteria. The capacity calculations for these conveyance elements will need to be included in the final report along with a curb capacity calculation for the paved parking area. The typical sections for the swales shall be shown on the final and detailed plans. The grading for the ponds and details for the outlet will also need to be shown in the plan set. Also, the drainage report should discuss and show the method for calculating the precipitation-frequency data and curve for Area III as shown on pages 24 of the LCSWDS, which is the addendum to the UDM. Also, the intensity-duration curve in the report has a title that indicates 3 curves will be provided but only 1 curve is shown. 9. Although the preliminary drainage and erosion control report does addresses erosion control, the erosion control measures must be based on calculated performance standards with the final report. A detailed erosion control plan showing all erosion control measures and including all applicable erosion control notes must also be submitted. The typical notes can be found in the appendix of the LCRARS and an example of the acceptable format for an erosion control plan can be reviewed in Volume 3 of the Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards (LCSDS). 10. As stated on the note on the cover sheet of the submitted plan set, the information shown on the plan set is a schematic and does not show necessary information needed for construction of the improvements. Detailed construction plans and a drainage and erosion control report will need to be reviewed and approved by our department prior to final approval and issuance of a development construction permit for these improvements. In addition, the certificate of occupancy for any buildings on the site can not be issued until the improvements are completed. The plans shall include all details and notes necessary to build the improvements per the requirements outlined in the review process. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc ' y Permits: 1. Per Section 9.5 and 9.6 of the LCLUC, Engineering Staff would like to notify the applicant that Transportation Capital Expansion Fees,(TCEF) will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. Based on information provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Manual, Staff has calculated the following TCEF's for the proposed uses: â€¢ A TCEF for one (1) - 2 room cabin to be $1,600. It should be noted that this rate applies until April 1,2008. After April 1, 2008, the TCEF Fee for one (1) - 2 room cabin will be to be $1,994. Staff has calculated a TCEF for one (1) - 2 room cabin to be $1,600. It should be noted that this rate applies until April 1, 2008. After April 1, 2008, the TCEF Fee for one (1) - 2 room cabin will be to be $1,994. â€¢ A TCEF for one (1) - 8 room "Reunion" cabin will be to be $6,400. It should be noted that this rate applies until April 1, 2008. After April 1,2008, the TCEF Fee forone (1) - 2 room "Reunion" cabin will be to be $1,994. 2. The County has adopted a Development Construction Permit (DCP) and this application will be subject to the DCP fees and associated conditions (Section 12.5 of the LCLUC). The DCP Fee will be required at the time of DCP issuance in accordance with duly enacted DCP fee regulations then in effect. According to current regulations, Development Construction Permit fees are $150 per single family unit (cabin in this case) and $50 per multi-family unit (Reunion Cabin in this case). For 6 cabins and 2 reunion cabins with 8 rooms in each, the DCP fee would be $1,700. Upon final approval of the construction plans, the applicant will need to contact the Larimer County Engineering Department to set up a pre-construction meeting and finalize the permit. 3. Any work within the Tunnel Road right-of-way may also require a Right-of-Way Construction Permit from this office. Access information and permits can be obtained by contacting Marc Lyons, Larimer County's Access Coordinator, at (970) 498-5709. 4. If one acre or more of land is disturbed with this development, the applicant is required to apply for a Stormwater Construction Permit from the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Recommendation: As part of the future submittals, we will ask that all comments listed above are addressed. In addition to addressing the comments in the construction plans and submitted reports, we ask that the applicant also provides written responses to the comments. The Engineering Department Conditions of approval are highlighted below: â€¢ Transportation Capital Expansion Fees (TCEF) will be required at the time of building permit issuance. â€¢ The design and collateral for the turn lane improvements to the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection must be completed prior to the certificate of occupancy of the first reunion cabin. â€¢ The construction of the right turn lane at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection must be completed by December 31, 2009. â€¢ A certificate of occupancy for any buildings on the site can not be issued until the site improvements are completed. Also, the site improvements can not be completed until a detailed construction plans, drainage report, and erosion control report are approved by the Engineering Department and a development construction permit for the improvements has been issued. Otherwise, the Larimer County Engineering Department does not have any major concerns or issues with the submittal. It appears from the preliminary information that the design is feasible and can be in general compliance with YMCA Master Plan and Engineering criteria for the Estes Valley Planning Area. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc , , 7 However, much more additional design, information and detail will still be necessary with the final submittal prior to our final approval and issuance of the development constructions permit. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5701 or e-mail at tdowns@larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. ce: Cornerstone Engineering, 1692 Big Thompson Ave - Suite 200Estes Park, CO 80517 reading file file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc - Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Community Development Department From: Greg Sievers & Scott Zum Date: August 23,2007 Re: Smugglers Cove, off Mesa Drive YMCA Camp, 2515 Tunnel Road After reviewing the Development plan #07-12 the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: no comment Light & Power: 1. Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2. We need to know the power requirements, single phase or three phase, voltage, amperage, etc. 3. We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4. The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location 5. Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 6. Submit plans from the project electrical engineer for Town review and approval. Water: Since the proposed service area is supplied by the YMCA water system and the proposed Development will also include the Water Department we have no comment. â€¢ Page 1 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 August 17, 2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 E.TES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-12 - Snugglers Cove - YMCA of the Rockies Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Owner's statement refers to the Town o f Estes Park. Since the property is located in Larimer County, the reference to the Town of Estes Park should be removed from the statement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. *ry Truly Tours, / Gregor/A. White GAW/ldr V // Cc: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes ReeM Fax: 970/586-2459 08/1542007 15:59 4987667 LARIMER CO BUILDING PAGE 01/01 1111 TOWN OF {SIES PARK Communify Development Department RECEIVED AUG 1320[V TO: All Affected Agencies FROM: Dave Shirk, Planner n 970-577-3729, dshirk@estes.org SUBJECT: Snugglers Cove - Mctes & Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on YMCA of the Rockies campus, 2515 Tunnel Road DATE: August 10,2007 Enclosed please find an application for a Development Plan 07-12 for the above- referenced property. This request was submitted by YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center and will be considered by the Estes Valley Planning Commission on September 18, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Please submit any comments (FAX # 970.586-0249) you may have regarding this request as soon as possible, but 00 later than August 24,2007. You are always welcome to attend this meeting. NOTE: Please send a copy of your comments to the applicant or his/her agent at the address or FAX number shown below: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Reetz 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX: 970-586-2459 Email: jreetz@ces-ccc.com Enclosures 1 Reu.,iow 84}4;A,ys (>)641 kied k ke Aye spriwk/el ~Per ,?~0 3 _ZÂ»,44Â»/240,74!~* ~~ .Al de le. P.O. BOX 1200 â€¢ 170 MACGREGOR AVENUE â€¢ ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 PHONE, BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICE: 970477-3733 â€¢ FAX 970-586-0249 PHONE, PLANNING OFFICE: 970-577-3721 â€¢ FAX 970-586-0249 www,stesnel.com/ComDev ~ UPPER <C *il- 3Z / DISTRICTI) P.O. Box 568 Ested Park, Colorado 80517 (970)-586-4544 (970) 586-1049 Fax August 17, 2007 Dave Shirk, Planner II Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Snugglers Cove Metes & Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on YMCA ofthe Rockies campus, 215 Tunnel Road Dear Dave, The YMCA is located in the Upper Thompson Sanitation District service area but is not part ofthe District; therefore, we cannot make stipulations or requirements pertaining to line sizing, manholes, cleanouts, etc. I am enclosing recommendations that are accepted as industry standards pertaining to such. The District does not possess accurate records of YMCA owned service lines. The plans submitted for District review, show the proposed eight inch line connecting to the existing sewer clean out that will be changed to a manhole. What size of line or where the line goes from there, the District has no information. Capacity may be an issue, especially if future development is considered. The District will need to perform a Fixture Unit Inventory for billing purposes. Additional Plant Investment Fees will need to be collected at the time the building permit applications are routed through the District's administration office. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank-You, Chris Bieker Operations Manager Upper Thompson Sanitation District cc: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Reetz 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Email: jreetz@ces-cce.com .- '- 1 /:j C h CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 BÂ«}INEERING & ~Gâ€¢ ~ SURVEYING INC ' July 25,2007 ~-~}[EC E E~~| ~7~ JUL 2 5 2007 _~ Mr. Bob Joseph Community Development Director Town ofEstes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter ofIntent for the "Snugglers Cove Developmenf' Parcel Number 34042-00-022 T, ear Bob, iomerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf ofour client YMCA ofthe Rookies are pleased to submit the Development/Site Plan for "Snugglers Cove Development". The plan is in conformance with the YMCA ofthe Rockies Estes Park Center - Master Plan approved in the spring of 2007. Owners/Lien Holders The land associated with this development is owned by YMCA ofthe Rockies, Estes Park Center. Proiect Descrintion This plan will add six (6) single family cabins and two (2) reunion buildings to the YMCA campus. A master plan for the campus has been approved by the Town ofEstes Park. Asphalt parking lots will be constructed for the reunion buildings and a gravel driveway will provide access to the cabins. A"Buffer Zone" is provided for the existing cabins and for Snugglers Cover archeological site. Access The subject development has access from Mesa Drive which currently travels through the YMCA campus. Utilities Utility services are provided as follows: Water Town ofEstes Park Service will be provided from a proposed 6" water main located at the intersection ofMesa Drive and Snugglers urt. Two (2) additional fire hydrants will be added in the parking area and along the gravel driveway. Electric Town ofEstes Park Service to the proposed building will be from an existing Junction box located in the approximate center ofthe development area. f. /: , re r. Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District An existing sewer main is located adjacent to Mesa Drive. New 8' sewer main and associated manholes will provide service to the project. ISO Calculations ISO calculations have been performed and subtnitted to the town for review. This proposed buildings meets the required Fire Flow. Miscellaneous Provisions Parking lot lighting shall be bollard type lighting which will not exceed 15 feet in height. The buildings have been coordinated with the existing and proposed trails as delineated in the Trails Master Plan. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincexely, /0.9 ~ ~Tes Reetz Senior Draftsman guÂ·A* (25 20 , ..... ESTES VALLEY r-j 1 LOEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPL16.-. rION ~ IE Â©E 0 %Â¢-*~ Submittal Date:- 7/25/2007 fl~ .1111 5 4 Â¥n, Type of Application ~ P Development Plan 1-' Boundary Line Adjustment Conc ominlum Map r Special Review E ROW or Easement Vacation F PreliminAry MAP r Rezoning Petition 1- Street Name Change r Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map 1- Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify 13 Minor Subdivision Plat E Amended Plat General Information Project Name Snugglers Cove Development Project Description Addition of cabins and reunion buildings at the YMCA Of The Rockies Project Address 2515 Tunnel Road, P.O. Box 800 Legal Description Meets and Bounds - Parcel ID # 34042-00-022 Section 4&5 Township 4N Â· Range 73W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) -595 Existing Land Use Accomodations, Conference Hall Proposed Land Use Accomodations, Conference Hall Existing Water Service 12 Town 0 Well 0 Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service P Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F- EPSD P UTSD r septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service 13 EPSD P UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes P No Existing Gas Service P )Wei r Other E None Existing Zoning A-Accomodations Proposed Zoning A-Accomodations Site Access (if not on public street) Mesa Drive Are there wetlands on the site? C Yes 9 No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? 12 Yes E No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Jes Reetz Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copyof plat orplan Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park .e. P.O. Box 1200 a 170 MacGregor Avenue + Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev ~l .KI KI gl ~1 1 Fh C . Primary Contact Person is r Owner 17 Applicant P ConsultanUEngineer Record Owner(s) YMCA Of The Rockies, Estes Park Center Mailing Address 2515 Tunnel Road, Box 800, Association Camp, Estes Park, Co 80511 Phone (970) 586-4444 Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-6088 Email Mholdt@ymcarockies.org Applicant Mark Holdt, YMCA fo the Rockies, Estes Park Center Mailing Address 2515 Tunnel Road, Box 800, Association Camp, Estes Park, Co 80511 Phone (970) 586-4444 Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-6088 Email Mholdt@ymcarockies.org Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 805Â¥7 - Phone (970) 586-2458 rAlEÂ© CE-E.Q.M.IE~ Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-2459 11 JUL 2 6 2007 Email jreetz@ces-ccc com 6 APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Record Owner 7#RA 77~77 , Vag PRE#,Dateâ‚¬e 7-25-07 / Applicant -53*7 3 166 Date 1 -29 -07 ,T vt C=) C' /3 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION * I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. â€¢ In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). k I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. I I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. â€¢ I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Rewrdowner 61 z'~7~\ , U#&2; P KE4/DR# Date 7~_25-7 Applicant 901,nr?->-7 Date t.,k % ~IMÂ©IEDVE =~1 fit JUL 26- 3 Revised 10/13/06 h 0 O (0 U) (D 52 m N E 2 W .9 AO-m D 28 Z, 58 183; to - 9- CD d 02 /2 W (D E 16 c E> a) 00 O-Ea >0 k L. Finley, Trustee Barbara Frick, Trustee eley, c:AL701 axine Lentz Ke 4118 V ven Drive H~Zi57~.~991503 & Viola -?U%%2 Jr. c/o Pamela Russo m Ridge Road Princeton, NJ 08540 & Elaine 3115 Acorn Wood Way Houston, TX 77059 Robin B./Jeffrey Alan/Jana Leigh Water Pamela W. Kosena Estes Park, C Owner Owner 11 Address Stat , & Katherine D. Hill EL-ZO da eAOE) siel66nus VOINA â€¢ Street signs shall be mounted at a standard height and have reflective lettering to be visible at night from Tunnel Road all the way to the proposed development. The method of accomplishing this should be included on the development plan. â€¢ All new development shall be addressed in accordance with Larimer County addressing policies. â€¢ An exclusive southbound right turn lane shall be constructed or guaranteed at the Tunnel Road-Kallenberg Drive intersection (design subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering). These are conditions of approval set forth in the Master Plan, and are included in this report for reference. Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2.D requires the Decision Making Body approve proposed Limits of Disturbance for all development plans. This section includes criteria for establishing Limits of Disturbance. It is Staff's opinion the proposed LOD meet these criteria. Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance Standards" applies to this proposal. No grading, excavation or tree/vegetation removal shall be permitted, whether to provide for a building site, for on-site utilities or services or for any roads or driveways, before issuance of a building permit. The proposed slope along the western edge of the parking lot requires special consideratioi per Section 7.2. Method of accomplishing revegetation (i.e. erosion mats, deep rooting plants) shall be included on the plan. Tree and Vegetation Protection. Existing trees to remain shall be fenced for protection prior to any site work. The area of tree protection fencing should be clearly delineated on the development plan. Tree protection fencing shall comply with standards set forth in Appendix D.VIII. Landscaping and Buffers. The proposed landscaping plan satisfies code requirements. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. No lighting fixture shall be higher than fifteen feet above ground. This includes parking lot and security lighting. A lighting "cut sheet" will need to be submitted for Staff review prior to issuance of first building permit. Off-Street Parking and Loading. This proposal requires 28 parking stalls; 34 are proposed. The plan should be amended to reflect this requirement. Page #3 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Electric. All electric service is to be placed underground. Drainage/FFater Quality Management. All required drainage facilities shall be installed and accepted in accordance with Section 7.12.F, which allows 25% of building permits to be issued prior installation of the drainage facilities. Sanitaly Sewer. The YMCA has a private collection system that connects to the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Water. Water will be provided through the YMCA's private water system. The YMCA has recently invested in "upgrades" to their private water system. These include construction of two new water storage tanks and a new water treatment plant (a membrane plant, very similar to the one the Town is planning on building next year). Furthermore, the YMCA has provided documentation to water rights adequate to support this and future development. Fire Protection. New fire hydrants will be installed, and must be in place prior to issuance of a building permit. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Larimer County Engineering has noted "the design is feasible and can be in general compliance with [the] YMCA Master Plan and Engineering criteria for the Estes Valley Planning Area." Light and Power has standard comments regarding costs, as-built plans, and electrical plans. Upper Thompson Sanitation District had comments regarding need for a fixture count for billing purposes, and also had recommendations for the YMCA regarding the private service line collection system. Public Works. The Light and Power Department had general comments regarding installation of electrical infrastructure. Town Attorney H/hite had comments regarding a minor change to the owner's statement. Page #4 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 Building Department. The Building Department has noted the proposed reunion cabins will need to be sprinkled. Conduits. Per Section 7.13, "conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be screened, covered or painted to minimize visual impacts." Street Names. One of the street names will need to be changed. The Larimer County "Rules of the Streets" requires unique road names. A different suffix does not make a name unique. Development Construction Permit. The Larimer County Engineering Department will require a Development Construction Permit before issuance of permits. The applicant should contact Larimer County Engineering (Matt Johnson) as soon as possible to coordinate. Other. The following changes to the plan should be made: 1) Location of street signs and street sign specifications shall be shown on the plat. 2) The ADA route shall be designed to meet federal standards (slope and width of sidewalk ramps). 3) Details of the sediment filtration pond shall be included on the plan, and shall be subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. The applicant should carefully review the Staff report, which contains several references to Code requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could lead to a delay in issuance ofbuilding permits or certificates of occupancy. 2. If all recommended conditions of approval are required, the development plan will comply with all applicable standards set forth in this Code. 3. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives ofthe YMCA Master Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for the development plan. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed "Snugglers Cove" Development Plan 07-12 CONDITIONAL TO: 1. A Development Construction Permit is required through the Larimer County Engineering Department prior to issuance ofbuilding permits. Page #5 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 2. Compliance with memo from Traci Downs to Dave Shirk dated September 6, 2007. 3. Compliance with memo from Greg Sievers and Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 23,2007. 4. The owner's statement shall be revised to reference Larimer County instead of the Town of Estes Park. 5. The proposed slope along the western edge of the parking lot requires special consideration, per Section 7.2. Method of accomplishing revegetation (i.e. erosion mats, deep rooting plants) shall be included on the plan. 6. Street names shall be changed to conform to Larimer County street naming standards. 7. Location of street signs and street sign specifications shall be shown on the plat. 8. The ADA route shall be designed to meet federal standards (slope and width of sidewalk ramps). 9. Details of the sediment filtration pond shall be included on the plan, and shall be subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move APPROVAL of Development Plan 07-12 "Snugglers Cove" with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENIAL: I move DISAPPROVAL of Development Plan 07-12 because... (state reason for denial -findings). CONTINUANCE: I move to continue Development Plan 07-12 because...(state reason for continuance - findings). Page #6 - Snugglers Cove, Development Plan 07-12 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LARIMER ~COUNTY Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Traci Downs, Development Review Services . .- DATE: September 6,2007 SUBJECT: YMCA of the Rockies Snugglers Cove - Estes Valley Planning Area Proiect Description/Background: YMCA of the Rockies is at 2515 Tunnel Road, also known as Spur 66. The YMCA has an approved master plan for their community which provides an approximate 20 year outlook for the site. The master plan is conceptual in nature and primarily serves to address strategies to better consider architecture, pedestrian and vehicle circulation, roads, parking, landscaping and irrigation, signage, lighting, environmental issues, stormwater management, accessibility, and open space. Consistent with the Master Plan, the YMCA is now proposing the Snugglers Cove Development, which will include 6 new single family cabins and 2 reunion buildings. All new structures will have access from Mesa Drive, which is an existing internal road serving portions of the YMCA Campus. The new access will be paved from Mesa Drive to the Reunion Buildings. Beyond the Reunion buildings, the access road serving the cabins will be an all-weather surface gravel road. The parking areas for the Reunion Buildings will be paved. Comments: 1. Based on the traffic memorandum provided by Matt Delich, dated December 13, 2006, an exclusive southbound right turn lane is already needed at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection. In addition, as a condition of approval of the master plan, any new traffic generating phase of development will require this improvement to be constructed. The submitted information did not include any commitments or information on this issue. The requirement to design and collateralize these improvements to Spur 66 prior to the certificate of occupancy of the first reunion cabin needs to be a condition of approval. This requirement should also be placed as a condition on the building permit for the first reunion cabin. The final and detailed design for the improvements needs to include all applicable submittal requirements listed in Chapter 3 of the LCRARS. 2. Since Condition #18 of the YMCA Master Plan does not clearly state the date when the southbound right turn must be completed at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection, a condition of approval of this application shall be that the right turn at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection must be completed by December 31, 2009. This time frame is consistent with Section 10.5.K of the EVDC. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc COMMITTED TO-EXCEUINCE 3. A geotechnical report and associated pavement design will be required with the design of the turn lane on Spur 66. The report and pavement design shall meet the requirements stated in Chapter 5 of the LCRARS, which discusses the County geotechnical and pavement design standards. All calculations, assumptions, and parametprs used should be included in the report. 4. We also highly recommend that the applicant hires a geotechnical engineer to prepare a geotechnical report and associated pavement design for the onsite paving to minimize premature failure of the pavement and decrease maintenance costs in the future. Staff would like a copy of the analysis and pavement design for our files. 5. The submitted information states that a 3 inch gravel drive is proposed to serve the cabins. To provide a more stable and durable road, this specification needs to be changed on the plans to require at least 4 inches of CDOT Class 5 or 6 adequately compacted aggregate road base. 6. To assess the additional trip generation rate generated by this development, we will ask that an addendum to the traffic impact memorandum provided by Matt Delich, dated December 13, 2006 is submitted. As part of the memorandum, sight distance shall be evaluated and confirmed to meet the minimum County standards specified in Chapter 4 of the LCRARS. 7. The access roads are up 1,000 feet long dead end roads without a second point of access. In addition, there is limited area for a fire truck to turn around at the terminus of the roads. Given this, a cul-de- sac bulb that can accommodate an emergency vehicle shall be provided at the end of each access road. Lastly, the Estes Park Fire Protection District shall have the opportunity to review the proposed building and internal street layout to ensure that it will also be adequate for their purposes. 8. A more detailed drainage and erosion control report and associated plan will need to be submitted with the final submittal. However, the preliminary/Conceptual drainage report and plan does address the key drainage and erosion control issues and is therefore acceptable for preliminary approval. The report discusses two proposed detention ponds with water quality outlets and several other erosion control best management practices for the site. With the final report, Staff will expect that the drainage design and report will have additional information and clarification on how the design incorporates the YMCA Drainage Master Plan Goals of protecting the roadways and infrastructure for the 25- year rain event and collecting and retaining the first inch of rainfall in the detention ponds. The proposed roadside swale and culvert sizing may need to be enlarged to account for these criteria. The capacity calculations for these conveyance elements will need to be included in the final report along with a curb capacity calculation for the paved parking area. The typical sections for the swales shall be shown on the final and detailed plans. The grading for the ponds and details for the outlet will also need to be shown in the plan set. Also, the drainage report should discuss and show the method for calculating the precipitation-frequency data and curve for Area III as shown on pages 24 of the LCSWDS, which is the addendum to the UDM. Also, the intensity-duration curve in the report has a title that indicates 3 curves will be provided but only 1 curve is shown. 9. Although the preliminary drainage and erosion control report does addresses erosion control, the erosion control measures must be based on calculated performance. standards with the final report. A detailed erosion control plan showing all erosion control measures and including all applicable erosion control notes must also be submitted. The typical notes can be found in the appendix of the LCRARS and an example of the acceptable format for an erosion control plan can be reviewed in Volume 3 of the Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards (LCSDS). 10. As stated on the note on the cover sheet of the submitted plan set, the information shown on the plan set is a schematic and does not show necessary information needed for construction of the improvements. Detailed construction plans and a drainage and erosion control report will need to be reviewed and approved by our department prior to final approval and issuance of a development construction permit for these improvements. In addition, the certificate of occupancy for any buildings on the site can not be issued until the improvements are completed. The plans shall include all details and notes necessary to build the improvements per the requirements outlined in the review process. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc Permits: 1. Per Section 9.5 and 9.6 of the LCLUC, Engineering Staff would like to notify the applicant that Transportation Capital Expansion Fees,(TCEF) will be required at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with duly enacted transportation capital expansion fee regulations then in effect. Based on information provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Manual, Staff has calculated the following TCEF's for the proposed uses: â€¢ A TCEF for one (1) - 2 room cabin to be $ 1,600. It should be noted that this rate applies until April 1, 2008. After April 1, 2008, the TCEF Fee for one (1) - 2 room cabin will be to be $1,994. Staff has calculated a TCEF for one (1) - 2 room cabin to be $ 1,600. It should be noted that this rate applies until April 1, 2008. After April 1, 2008, the TCEF Fee for one (1) - 2 room cabin will be to be $1,994. â€¢ A TCEF for one (1) - 8 room "Reunion" cabin will be to be $6,400. It should be noted that this rate applies until April 1, 2008. After April 1, 2008, the TCEF Fee for one (1) - 2 room "Reunion" cabin will be to be $1,994. 2. The County has adopted a Development Construction Permit (DCP) and this application will be subject to the DCP fees and associated conditions (Section 12.5 of the LCLUC). The DCP Fee will be required at the time of DCP issuance in accordance with duly enacted DCP fee regulations then in effect. According to current regulations, Development Construction Permit fees are $150 per single family unit (cabin in this case) and $50 per multi-family unit (Reunion Cabin in this case). For 6 cabins and 2 reunion cabins with 8 rooms in each, the DCP fee would be $1,700. Upon final approval of the construction plans, the applicant will need to contact the Larimer County Engineering Department to set up a pre-construction meeting and finalize the permit. 3. Any work within the Tunnel Road right-of-way may also require a Right-of-Way Construction Permit from this office. Access information and permits can be obtained by contacting Marc Lyons, Larimer County' s Access Coordinator, at (970) 498-5709. 4. If one acre or more of land is disturbed with this development, the applicant is required to apply for a Stormwater Construction Permit from the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Recommendation: As part of the future submittals, we will ask that all comments listed above are addressed. In addition to addressing the comments in the construction plans and submitted reports, we ask that the applicant also provides written responses to the comments. The Engineering Department Conditions of approval are highlighted below: â€¢ Transportation Capital Expansion Fees (TCEF) will be required at the time of building permit issuance. â€¢ The design and collateral for the turn lane improvements to the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection must be completed prior to the certificate of occupancy of the first reunion cabin. â€¢ The construction of the right turn lane at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection must be completed by December 31, 2009. â€¢ A certificate of occupancy for any buildings on the site can not be issued until the site improvements are completed. Also, the site improvements can not be completed until a detailed construction plans, drainage report, and erosion control report are approved by the Engineering Department and a development construction permit for the improvements has been issued. Otherwise, the Larimer County Engineering Department does not have any major concerns or issues with the submittal. It appears from the preliminary information that the design is feasible and can be in general compliance with YMCA Master Plan and Engineering criteria for the Estes Valley Planning Area. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc T However, much more additional design, information and detail will still be necessary with the final submittal prior to our final approval and issuance of the development constructions permit. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5701 or e-mail at tdowns@larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Cornerstone Engineering, 1692 Big Thompson Ave - Suite 200Estes Park, CO 80517 reading file file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies_Snugglers Cove Development.doc 71. Town of Estes Park 1-3 Public Works Engineering :fij Room 100, Town Hall - P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Community Development Department From: Greg Sievers & Scott Zum Date: August 23,2007 Re: Smugglers Cove, off Mesa Drive YMCA Camp, 2515 Tunnel Road After reviewing the Development plan #07-12 the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: no comment Light & Power: 1. Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2. We need to know the power requirements, single phase or three phase, voltage, amperage, etc. 3. We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4. The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location 5. Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 6. Submit plans from the project electrical engineer for Town review and approval. Water: Since the proposed service area is supplied by the YMCA water system and the proposed Development will also include the Water Department we have no comment. â€¢ Page 1 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 August 17, 2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-12 - Snugglers Cove - YMCA of the Rockies Dear Mr. Shirk: ihave the following comments: 1. The Owner's statement refers to the Town of Estes Park. Since the property is located in Larimer County, the reference to the Town of Estes Park should be removed from the statement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. yery Truly Ypurs, C EX-L~-~ / Gregg A. White Y GAW/ldr CC: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Reefs/ Fax: 970/586-2459 0 08/15/2007 15:59 4987667 LARIMER CO BUILDING PAGE 01/01 1~- TOWN OF {SIES PARK Communily Development Department RECEIVED AUG 132019 TO: All Affected Agencies FROM: Dave Shirk, Planner II 970-577-3729, dshirk@estes.org SUBJECT: Snuggiers Cove Mctes & Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on YMCA of the Rockies campus, 2515 Tunnel Road DATE: August 1.0, 2007 Enclosed please find an application for a Development Plan 07-12 for the above- referenced property. This request was submitted by YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center and will be considered by the Estes Valley Planning Commission on September 18, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the Town Hall. 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Please submit any comments (FAX # 970-586-0249) you may have regarding this request as soon as possible, but no later than August 24,2007. You are always welcome to attend this meeting. NOTE: Please send a copy of your comments to the applicant or his/her agent at the address or FAX number shown below: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Reetz 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX: 970-586-2459 Email: jreetz@ces-ccc.com Enclosures 1 Re.u.ou BU}bu,S (pt~4,4 k~ed 1Â·o be -Aye spriw tel puf 12 DO 3 IAL,â€¢Alth Mwb 1 64 ;/cbul 612. P.O. BOX 1200 â€¢ 170 MACGREGOR AVENUE â€¢ ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 PHONE, BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICE: 970-5774735 â€¢ FAX 970-586-0249 PHONE, PLANNING OFFICE: 970-577-3721 â€¢ FAX 970-586-0249 www.eitesnet.com/ComDev @ UPPER C #IL /3<illi<WI".11nlcTD P.O. Box 568 Ested Park, Colorado 80517 (970)-586-4544 (970) 586-1049 Fax August 17, 2007 Dave Shirk, Planner II Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Snugglers Cove Metes & Bounds property accessed via Mesa Drive on YMCA ofthe Rockies campus, 215 Tunnel Road Dear Dave, The YMCA is located in the Upper Thompson Sanitation District service area but is not part of the District; therefore, we cannot make stipulations or requirements pertaining to line sizing, manholes, cleanouts, etc. I am enclosing recommendations that are accepted as industry standards pertaining to such. The District does not possess accurate records of YMCA owned service lines. The plans submitted for District review, show the proposed eight inch line connecting to the existing sewer clean out that will be changed to a manhole. What size of line or where the line goes from there, the District has no information. Capacity may be an issue, especially if future development is considered. The District will need to perform a Fixture Unit Inventory for billing purposes. Additional Plant Investment Fees will need to be collected at the time the building permit applications are routed through the District's administration office. Ifyou have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank-You, an jÂ»t-Al, Chris Bieker Operations Manager Upper Thompson Sanitation District cc: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Reetz 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Email: jreetz@ ces-cce.com 0 0 CORNE#STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 ENG]NE~ING & /G, \ SURVEYING. INC ./ July 25,2007 101'EÂ©ED *Ki~1 ~ JUL 25 %107 ~ Mr. Bob Joseph Ju - Community Development Director Town ofEstes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter of Intent for the"Snugglers Cove Developmenf' Parcel Number 34042-00-022 Dear Bob, -ornerstone Engineering and Surveying Inc. (CES) on behalf ofour client YMCA ofthe Rockies arepleased to submit the Development/Site Plan for "Snugglers Cove Development". The plan is in conformance with the YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center - Master Plan approved in the spring of 2007. Owners/Lien Holders The land associated with this development is owned by YMCA ofthe Rockies, Estes Park Center. Project Descrintion This plan will add six (6) single family cabins and two (2) reunion buildings to the YMCA campus. A master plan for the campus has been approved by the Town of Estes Park. Asphalt parking lots will be constructed for the reunion buildings and a gravel driveway will provide access to the cabins. A"Buffer Zone" is provided for the existing cabins and for Snugglers Cover archeological site. Access The subject development has access from Mesa Drive which currently travels through the YMCA campus. Utilities Utility services are provided as follows: Water Town ofEstes Park Service will be provided from a proposed 6" water main located at the intersection ofMesa Drive and Snugglers un. Two (2) additional fire hydrants will be added in the parking area and along the gravel driveway. Electric Town ofEstes Park Service to the proposed building will be from an existing Junction box located in the approximate center of the development area. e L, Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District An existing sewer main is located adjacent to Mesa Drive. New 8' sewer main and associated manholes will provide service to the project. ISO Calculations ISO calculations have been performed and submitted to the town for review. This proposed buildings meets the required Fire Flow. Miscellaneous Provisions Parking lot lighting shall be bollard type lighting which will not exceed 15 feet in height. The buildings have been coordinated with the existing and proposed trails as delineated in the Trails Master Plan. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. 422:*~ ~ les Reetz Senior Draftsman 122<0% tz'Â· Ob ESTES VALLEY r-.1 C DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPL'6â€ž/rION DIEÂ©Eo viN 1. Submittal Date:_ 7/25/2007 |11 .mi 9 * onm Type of Application Development Plan 1- Boundary Line Adjustment Conc ominlum Map Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Freliminpry Mmp Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change r Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify Minor Subdivision Plat Aniended Plat General Information Project Name Snugglers Cove Development Project Description Addition of cabins and reunion buildings at the YMCA Of The Rockies Project Address 2515 Tunnel Road, P.O. Box 800 Legal Description Meets and Bounds Parcel ID # 34042-00-022 Section 4&5 Township 4N Range 73W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) -595 Existing Land Use Accomodations, Conference Hall Proposed Land Use Accomodations, Conference Hall Existing Water Service P Town r Well r Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 12 Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD 12 UTSD r Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD P UTSD r Septic Is a sewer lift station required? E Yes P No Existing Gas Service P Xcel r Other E None Existing Zoning A-Accomodations Proposed Zoning A-Accomodations Site Access (if not on public street) Mesa Drive Are there wetlands on the site? F Yes P No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? 9 Yes C No Primary Contact Information Name ofPrimary Contact Person Jes Reetz Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev ~1 ~1 il KI ~1 'Ir-Ill 11il 0 0 0 - 0 -0 Primary Contact Person is r Owner F- Applicant P ConsultanVEngineer Record Owner(s) YMCA Of The Rockies, Estes Park Center Mailing Address 2515 Tunnel Road, Box 800, Association Camp, Estes Park, Co 80511 Phone (970) 586-4444 Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-6088 Email Mholdt@ymcarockies.org Applicant Mark Holdt, YMCA fo the Rockies, Estes Park Center Mailing Address 2515 Tunnel Road, Box 800, Association Camp, Estes Park, Co 80511 Phone (970) 586-4444 Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-6088 Email Mholdt@ymcarockies.org Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-2458 ,@12(SEDÂ¥IE Â£7 Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-2459 1) Jul. 2 6 2007 Email jreetz@ces-ccc.corn _ ~ 1.29 ~ APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Record Owner ,&/ t 2%.0-2 2Â¢~,, v,Â«PREvowl)ate 7 + 25 -07 ~ Applicant -53*7 5 12' Date 7 - 25- -47 | APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. b â€¢ In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). â€¢ I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWDevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ l grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. â€¢ l acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Recorâ‚¬9wner &7' 2~~ >731 ' U#&5 f' Rec,/DRA- Date ~ye_25-7 Applicant 7*57 22'* - Date 7-2Â» 67 I IEÂ© E 0 VE'r=~1 ft JUL 26 3*9 1 ~ Revised 10/13/06 h LO 0 00 0 0 2 I LU g CO LO .r- lo /2 W EC O-E# & Katherine D. Hill 10003 Pratt Place D 20910 k L. Finley, Trustee Barbara Frick, Trustee END axine Lentz Kelly 4118 y Haven Drive umble, TX 77339-1 D. & Viola To~~1~~s, Jr. c/o Pamela Russo 69 Elm Ridge Road Princeton, NJ 08540 David P & Elaine J 3115 Acorn Wood Way Houston, TX 77059 Owner Owner 11 Address Robin B./Jeffrey Alan/Jana Leigh Water Pamela W. Kosena 1860 Twin Drive E L-ZO cla eAOO sie166nus VOINA - n-g 1 yUKBEY\ 1,4/ SNUGGLERS COVE DEVELOPMENT ~ 4 / / 20 0 20 40 60 SCALE 1" = 20' , 4 EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT INV=7980.55 2/ -b // 44.9 - - - "NO BUILD LINE"- BUFFER ZONE --Â·- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ---- EXISTING UNPAVED DRIVE EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION EXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR -E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -W EXISTING WATER LINE -G EXISTING GAS LINE â€¢ PROPOSED CONTOUR W/ ELEVATION PROPOSED 6" PVC SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED 6" C900 PVC WATER UNE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE PROPOSED 4" PVC ELECTRIC PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE PROPOSED TELEPHONE SERVICE - PROPOSED DRAINAGE DITCH FLOWLINE Â·Â·Â·Â· EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· EXISTING WATER VALVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY , PROPOSED WATER VALVE Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER PROPOSED TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 1Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·~Â·Â· Â· PROPOSED STREET LIGHT -Â· Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED TRASH DUMPSTER EXISTING TREE (TYP.) ~ Â· Â· PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE DOUGLAS FIR COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE (8-TOTAL) PONDEROSA PINE OLD GOLD JUNIPER Â·,Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·PROPOSED SHRUB KARL FOERSTAR GRASS WHITE SNOWBERRY (24-TOTAL) RUSSIAN SAGE SEP 12 2007 TT STATISTICS: R D S "./Nal / A QUUMA +Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· 8832 SF -~ -11f -- - , Sidewalk Â· Â· Â·1390 SF /RELLE=70/ ' 1 BUILDING Reunion Buildings Â· 8982 SF 1 1 OWNER AND LIENHOLDER'S STATEMENT _ Asphalt 15925 SF 9- -- - Gravel Driveway 28193 SF t-t---- . \11 ~et<i~d=12&~M"rt:Ia~;1 t~ell o~e:ba~ ~entho~d=12 2%=y chown / Development Code and any other ordinance of the Town of of Estes Park, Colorado, TOTAL ............................. 63322 SF /0 ASPHALT ~-- 4,~-i:7~ pertaining thereto. 40 / /4 ~,- NO BUILD AREA Utilities: Owner ..tri / (BUFFER ZONE) ~ Â¢ 4 Water YMCA Electric Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Gas Excel 1Â·33'1&<N'k.0.VÂ»'1:4?-r.=teâ‚¬'â‚¬4~24;*%1 --- Â·Â·Â·z=- ---~~Aovvm~51â€ž,~c Telephone Qwest 1- / 1 \13 ) 4" CLASS 5 OR 6 MARK HOLDT ' S 4-'t. 07/31/07 TOEP COMPLETENESS COMMENTS JUI SNUGGLERS COVE DEVELOPMENT COMPACTED AGGREGATE - DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: ROAD BASE ~ 4" COMPACTED BASE 09/07/07 TOEP PREUM STAFF COMMENTS JIM APPROVAL 4 ~ 1 I i-- ---------- PROPOSED J OR UNDISTURBED SOIL COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO - â„¢CA OF THE ROCKIES, TOWN OF ESTES PA CORNE#STONE Approved by the Estes Valley Planning Commission Day ~ ~ SHEET TITLE: CONCRETE PAN of , 2007. n J' % - 4.Â¢>A % N / CONCRETE PAN DETAIL SITEPLAN ENOnoi=No & rf'G. 1~ SURVEYINcl INC Betty Hull Chair NOT TO SCALE ' ~ DESIGNED BY WST ~APPROVED BY KUP I JOB NO. SHFFT SHFFT 10&,10=-SON't~~S/ Cm, 000-9 2 341.004 13 CUENT: YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ESTES PARL CO. 80017 \Alf/ FAX (970) 686-2469 DRAWN BY -16~ ~ DATE AUG 2007 | CHECKED BY WST | SCALE AS SHOWN T4142&0,5 "r, Af~rti#121~ .A. . . A . .0 0 . A. . A . e ..... &...fe~ .. + I 0 -1. 4..21111111 . 1 1. 1 9 ,! 1 -5 J . ... . . 4. . I . .. .. .. . - .. 110 e D I ./ . 1 -D e I. O 0 n e 00. 1 I . ... 1 .- ---I .. 0 Apâ€ž4P. 21. . ...4 . 0 I ./ .=D . - .. ': .. = O . .- . ... D. .. A . . e I . I ... .. A , 0 - ...' 0. 0 e .... D .... 9 2.0 2 . - 0. .. - - ......... - ... r e - :.0. .. - .... . I - ... . I -IiI - - - -1.-I . . . 000 ... i. - - -- - I . I . ........ I. liz. ... .., - - Â· I ... , 0. 0 .0 . --I---/0.- e . .. . 0 - I . 2.1 . 1 D .... SNUGGLERS COVE DEVELOPMENT - ~ I -2 /~ 4 / 4.;f MATAUNL -1 i ll ?4443 \ G / 1 N YMCA OF THE ROCKIES, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF ~ 1 / / /. / // 1/ < /// /. \\\ SEE ~HEET 1 li ~ ~ 1 i I 01 \ 1 ' 0 ' /, 72*clh \ \ , LARIMER, STATE OF COLORAD~/ 1 ~~ d ~ ~<~0~ / / t' - \* Il, / + \ \ SEDIMENT , 1 \ \ 1 1,1 1 F FILTRATION POND / 1 1 \ col il \ /0 0 \ 1 .m// . \ 0 <' ~ \1 AREA NOT o \ i"\ i #1-\ N 12'*6' RIPRAP -\,- 4-TOBE \\ 1 i i \,0 i , t.-1 -l \ \ 3 \ \1 1 ix i i i ' i \ mi ly- CHANEL 02=6" \ ; DISTURBED , d TA . \-6- -7.~ \ \ \ \ \\ r.\ \ \ 1 . \ PROPOSED 1 \ \\ \ 0 \ \ I | 1 TREE 1 m \ 1/9 \ \ ,~ Â· turt ~iI L INV=70.04-~, N :il ) rt- 20' GRAVEL \ 1 1 ROADWAY \ 5 il I \ i 1 6 \ 4 X /1 \\\ \ \ \ /1 1 1\ 1 7 \\ UGHTPOLE 7 : ~5'SHRUMS A \ \ al \ 1 \ F l A</ / 1 -0 60 1 1 7 1 1 = 1 , / 1 \ ig condition at 1 1 1 1 ng, weeding, / L n and other \ \ \ six feet tall at \ 50% two in \ L_ \ \ Vurserymen ]Iity standards rri wildlife amended. \ 0 0 19 7%\ LW\\ \\ \ \ \ B *C / 3 1 \ \ W SE RADIUS-----02~00/ PARKING 3" ASPHALT LAYER DETECABLE WARNINC 1. THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL Bl AT SIDEWALK/STREET TRANSITIONS. TI MADE IN PAVER FORM WITH A TRUNC THE DOMES SHALL BE PLACED IN A OIL 2. THE TOP OF THE DRAINAGE WEEP H( AT THE LOWEST POINT OF THE DEE 3. ALL DETECTABLE WARNING AREAS SH, OF 6 INCHES FROM THE FLOW UNE NOT BE MORE THAN A MAXIMUM OF POINT ON THE FLOW LINE OF THE C WARNING AREAS SHALL BE 24 INCHES IN LENGTH AND (bu Nult 03 - 1 I I Â· 0,/ - 1,4â€¢ - Inica uy '1'2111 :coult.inits, TOWN OF ESTES PARK - COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO COVER THE COMPLETE WIDTH OF THE RAMP AREA ONLY. -i 1.- ~4' DIA DRAINAGE WEEP HOLE 6Â»-8'TO j z WKNEASTONE A- L DETECTABLE WARNING WELL CURB FLOW UNE ShEET TITLE: 4. T.HETHDEETCE~0AB~ ~~141!212& tlfu =M~|,CLUDED PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A Â£2(6119/L,GEN SHALL BE PLAN VIEW 2 SITEPLAN 5. RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 12:1. THE DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL BOTH DIRECTIONS. DESIGNED BY WST APPROVED BY __1(kIP J08 NO. 1692 BIG THO,IPSON ~ (970) 686-2468 EQUAL IN DRAWN BY -!L~ DATE AUG 2007 0I - DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL AREA SLOPES SHALL NOT â‚¬HEET SHEET ' BE STEEPER THAN 20:1. NOT TO SCALE 341.004 23 CLIENT: YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ESTES PARK, CO. 80617 NkkYf FAX (970) 688-2469 CHECKED BY WST SCALE AS SHOWN , . 1 1 - A A. 00 0 \. . 0 . 00 :.. -00 .2 .Wil /.. 0 U 0 4 - . A I ................. J .1....96....511" ... 944 - I. 0 .... - :.. 1. 4 00 - \ . 2\ 4 .. A .. .... .. .. .6 , 4 ;0 - .... . 1. .. ........ ...... k , . 9 . . .. . .. 9 In~~~~h~ - 0 . ... . .. mil'..11 \. .... 0 1 .. ... I 0 00 .0 .1 i :0 .0 Â· ~i~' mi '... ..1, ............ . .......... ... .. .... ... - 44 ' A .... 0 - 00 * . D- . 1 . . 4. D- = . 4,1 .6 0 0. . 1 - 0 0 . .. . 1 -:I .0 1 0 . .....ma' 00 4...0. 0 . A..0 . . 4. 7-Ii/851 00 .. -0. I. 00. . A t . . l / 7 ~/t 4/~~ C 2 6 . f, 0 =: .* . 6 D--- I :00: . 0 . 0 1 .:. ... .. & 0 - 0 0 . 0-I -0 ...-0 , l IDA: .J . J. A I ... . J ... . . ... 0 . , .-.A.. . D- -- 4 . . . D . 00 ... . D D. / I - ..1 0 . .: .. , A - 0 0 .... 1.11 . 0 - L 0. D D .. .- D -= D D = . - . 1,01 0 -= D I : 1 0. 0 :1 1 = . D - 11 1 I .. . 1 '' A . .. I -,1 - - . 1 0 0 0. 1 1. . . . . . 0 , * 1.\ a - - 1 - 1,10 1 .1 . I . SNUGGLEPÂ° nn \ ir nr\/rl nnk,IrAIT f \th . 5 1.-2 A i , \ I ,/A/ / ty // / 1 \ r i t / YMCA OF THE RO LAF i \\lit / 1 i 1 T 1 1 1 1 .c ' r re 1 0 1 1 , i 128.5 ~ 1 3 / 4 4 / i RIM=8 .0 INV=8 1 .0 / 1 BALD EAGLE EC I. til / \ / 1 / / I , Ik il . / \V/ / / 1 1 j \ 1 /1.11 1 4-- '\Ix I / 1 / 1 / 1 /1 / / / / /1/ / t \4\ , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rrtl , 1 4/ 1 1 f / Utraw lili 1 111 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 jil 1 lit >,\2139: 1 1/1 R 1 111 lili 11 1 1 1 1 1 / iiI 4... 1 \ \ ~ . 111 1 1 / 1 ; 1 1 1 il , \ COf -, FOLLOW PREVIOUSLY .. PROPOSED TRAIL TO L LINE ,/ DISTURBED GROUND INT( 1 Â¢ ' 0 N 0 20 40 60 SCALE 1" = 20' -- \ PROPOSED GRAVEL -*,4.04.4"i~~~~~~~ 4 COMPACTED J 1 ----- UAL t.: MtÂ¥131014: A T : PROJECT TITLE: 07/31/07 TOEP COMPLETENESS COMMENTS JLN SNUGGLERS COVE DEVELOPMENT L ROADWAY (4" CLASS 5 08/04/07 RE-AUGN UNITS 3&4 - JUI AGGREGATE BASE 09/07/07 TOEP PREUM STAFF COMMENTS JIR YMCA OF THE ROCKIES, TOWN OF ESTES PARK CORNE#STONE ~- EXISTING COURSE EXISTING --~ COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO OR 6 COMPACTED GRADE GRADE AGGREGATE ROAD BASE) SHEET TITLE: GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVEWAY PAVED PRIVATE DRIVEWAY - SITEPLAN mÂ«m-mol <~<~amrm4 20 TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SECTION DESIGNED BY WST APPROVED BY KMP JOB NO. SH[[T SHEET ~E~â„¢0*PSON ~~*' (970, 5.-2458 NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE DRAWN BY -l!.~ DATE AUG 2007 341.004 33 CLIENT: YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ESVVN PARE~ CO. 80617 NÂ¥7 FAX (970) 686-2469 CHECKED BY MST SCALE AS SHOWN . 1 .. ... . . 1 . 7 4/ ', . A . 0 ..... ~6 .4-6 'le . /A~j/// 4 90 .. \ *Al~*65 4-4 .0 .a-A. A P 0 9 56 41, . . -. 0.00 -'3:, 1":1'.-~M.--- 0 1 1, 0- 0.--- a 0. . '1 . - -----.~ ...0 -I. 0 - - . - 0,~ 4 4lmilli - Ali W- . - "- v : . 1 , ,., - ..0 . 1 . 0 1. 1 ..A-7 V. ir..Â£:I'llil- . . . , . L4 Sal---1---1-/E . A}r , .. . / 44. 4 . 0 + 0 1 e - illillilililit' lill ..4 . 2*2 m - .. e . ..... , . ~ e. :P , Â· . :000 0 .0 . ==.31/12=1101.= :0 2 0 . 14 0 . - 0 r a I. 4... -- 0 . 14. .. 0. 4.- 0 0 0 0 D. . 1- 0 . . 0 . 0 43'.u.infirow-Z#BDNIAÂ·.iz,-747:;U.42*Â·Â·~Â·,tÂ·â€¢0:0<rn-~,1-,9GAITAIt:g,â€¢~~~Aâ€¢lrLÂ·4 1. . f -~ Della Terra (Dp 07-14) ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com --i-- DATE: September 18, 2007 REOUEST: Approval to redevelop an I 111+5tktr.G~~~~~~ USB existing campground with a fourteen-room 7/9<71kr-*tiv 7"v lodge and wedding facility. G~- 36 / 9,Â£94 3. 36 LOCATION: 3501 Fall River Road Nbu/ain USFS 1.Oral Fark .. e APPLICANT/OWNER: Della Terra LLC (Pamela Amelang, President) = USE F-P 31 Bul.y STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Shear Engineering (Fort Collins) Parcel Number: 3516000002 Development Area: 12.73 acres (+/-) Number of Lots: One Existing Land Use: Campground Proposed Land Use: Lodge, wedding facility Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations Adjacent Zoning- East: "A-1" Accommodations North: "O" Open (Larimer County) West: "O" Open (Larimer County) South: "CO" Commercial Outlying Adjacent Land Uses- East: Single-family residential North: Rocky Mountain National Park West: Rocky Mountain National Park South: Commercial retail Services- Water: Well Sewer: UTSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to redevelop an existing campground with a guest lodge/wedding facility. The redevelopment is minor, and will consist primarily of paving the existing drive and building a new ' lodge in an area currently used for RV campsites. Very little additional site disturbance is proposed. The main lodge building will be 22,330 square feet and contain twelve guest suites, two staff quarters, exercise room, "theater" room, main lodge room, two libraries, massage room, breakfast area, and kitchen facilities. The wedding facility, which will be attached to the main lodge, will include the wedding room, bar area, DJ area, and restrooms. All campsites will be removed. Some will be converted to parking areas, some will be revegetated, and some will be used for the outdoor wedding area (no improvements planned for this area). The motel and cabin units will remain, as will the coffee bar. REVIEW CRITERIA: This development plan is subject to applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Zoning Requirements. Land Use. The proposed use classification is High-Intensity Accommodations, which is an allowed use in the "A" district. The specific use is "Resort Lodge/Cabins." Density. The proposed density is two units per acre (23 units into 12.726 acres). The applicant has provided an adjusted density required due to the slope, and has netted out 80% of the land area due to the entire site being above the "blue line." The adjusted density requires a total of 84,000 square feet. The net land area is 110,903 square feet. Therefore, this proposal meets density requirements. Impervious Coverage. The "A" district has a maximum impervious coverage of 50%, the proposed 15% complies with this requirement. Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance Standards" applies to this proposal. No grading, excavation or tree/vegetation removal shall be permitted, whether to provide for a building site, for on-site utilities or services, or for any roads or driveways, before issuance of a building permit. Limits ofDisturbance. Section 7.2.D requires the Decision-Making Body approve proposed Limits of Disturbance for all development plans. This development plan will not increase the existing disturbed area. Page #2 - Della Terra Development Plan 07-14 I 4 Per Section 7.2.B6, retaining walls over four feet tall must be engineered (building permit issue). All disturbed areas will need to be restored in accordance with Section 7.2.C "Restoration of Disturbed Areas." Tree and Vegetation Protection. Existing trees to remain shall be fenced for protection prior to any site work. The area of tree protection fencing should be clearly delineated on the development plan. Tree protection fencing shall comply with standards set forth in Appendix D.VIII. Landscaping and Buffers. Existing landscaping satisfies all landscaping requirements except parking-lot screening. The proposed parking-lot screening does not comply with standards set forth in Section 7.5. The required changes are minor (adding more shrubs), and have been included as a recommended condition of approval. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. No lighting fixture shall be higher than fifteen feet above ground. This includes parking lot and security lighting. The applicant is aware of these requirements and intends to comply with "dark skf' lighting. A lighting "cut sheet" will need to be submitted for Staff review prior to issuance of first building permit. Off-Street Parking and Loading. The parking summary table shall be amended to include the coffee, motel, and cabins requirements, and the Lodge requirements shall be amended to require 28 spaces instead of 14. These are inconsequential changes; this proposal requires 89 parking stalls and 94 will be provided. CDOT has confirmed no access permit will be required. Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Electric. All electric service is to be placed underground, including the existing overhead line. Existing power is sufficient for the proposed building. The applicant desires to extend three-phase power for the required fire-protection generator. However, this power is not available at this time. The applicant is in negotiations with a neighbor to obtain a power easement. If this occurs, the applicant will extend three-phase power. If three-phase power is not available, the required fire-protection generator will be a diesel generator. Page #3 - Della Terra Development Plan 07-14 , Drainage/Water Quality Management. The applicant has submitted a detailed drainage/erosion control/water quality plan. As of September 12, the Town Engineer has yet to provide final approval. Sanitary Sewer. The new building will require a new main, which is shown on the development plan. Water. The property is currently served by five (5) existing wells, all adjudicated for domestic and commercial uses (Case No. W-5597, entered on October 23, 1975). The Estes Valley Development Code states "all development shall provide adequate and functional domestic water service to each lot pursuant to this subsection. Public water service is the preferred method of domestic water .provision in all zoning districts in the Estes Valley. To the maximum extent feasible, this preferred method of service shall be provided." The property currently is unable to obtain Town water, but is in negotiations with the Town and surrounding property owners to extend water service. These negotiations are ongoing, and Staff suggests the issue of water service be addressed through the annexation agreement. A condition of approval should be to submit the annexation petition to the Town Clerk no later than March 31, 2008. Staff suggests there are several mitigating factors to allow this redevelopment to continue using the well system instead of requiring extension of town water: 1) Existing adjudicated well system. 2) The Larimer County Health Department has no objection. 3) Reduction in usage by approximately 275,000 gallons per year (approximately 30%). Fire Protection. Per Section 7.12.G, all required fire protection requirements shall be installed prior to issuance of a building permit. The phasing plan shall address this requirement. The applicant has submitted a fire flow analysis, which has been forwarded to the fire chief for review and comment. The proposed fire flow rates do not meet standard building code requirements, thus requiring approval of the fire chief, which has been granted. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Town Attorney White had a variety of comments: Page #4 - Della Terra Development Plan 07-14 , â€¢ While the statement of intent calls this a "bed and breakfast," under the terms of the Estes Valley Development Code this use is classified as a Resort Lodge. â€¢ Applicant is discussing annexation with the Town Administrator' s office. â€¢ See discussion below. â€¢ Since corrected. Building DepartmenL The Applicant should contact Will Birchfield (577-3728) to discuss building issues such as demolition, grading, and building permit requirements. The property is currently under the jurisdiction of the Larimer County Building Department, who has agreed to cede the building permit process to the Town due to the pending annexation. Public Works. The Public Works Department had several comments regarding engineering and electrical design. No permits will be issued until these issues have been resolved (requires minor design changes to the stormwater and road design). Upper Thompson Sanitation District had several comments regarding manhole spacing, grease interceptor, service lines, and other usual issues. These have been included as suggested conditions of approval. Rocky Mountain National Park had comments related to amplified sound and solar panels. The town noise ordinance will apply to this proposal. This ordinance sets a level of 55 dB(A) as measured from the property line; this equates to a normal conversation (for comparison, a telephone dial tone is 80 dB, truck traffic is 90 dB, and above 90 dB may result in hearing loss; an increase of 10 dB's equates to a doubling of noise level). Americans with Disabilities Act. Per Building Department comments, this "development has requirements regarding accessibility for physically disabled persons." The development plan includes four handicapped-accessible parking spaces, which are centrally located. These spaces will need to be marked and signed in accordance with Section 7.11.J4. Additionally, the nearby ramp requires "truncated domes" per State and Federal law. Conduits. Per Section 7.13, "conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be screened, covered or painted to minimize visual impacts." Construction Plans. Final construction plans shall be approved by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department and UTSD prior to issuance of the grading permit and/or first building permit. Page #5 - Della Terra Development Plan 07-14 , STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. The applicant should carefully review the Staff report, which contains several references to Code requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could lead to a delay in issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 2. If all recommended conditions of approval are required, the development plan will comply with all applicable standards set forth in this Code. 3. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for this request. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed "Della Terra Mountain Chateau" Development Plan 07-14 CONDITIONAL TO: 1. The applicant shall submit an annexation petition to the Town Clerk no later than March 31, 2008. 2. Compliance with memo from Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 31, 2007. 3. Stormwater management plan shall be subject to review and approval of the Town Engineer. 4. Compliance with memo from Doug Ryan to Dave Shirk dated August 27,2007. 5. Compliance with memo from Upper Thompson Sanitation District to Dave Shirk dated August 21, 2007. 6. A development agreement and letter of credit shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. The parking lot screening shall comply with Section 7.5 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 8. The parking summary table shall be amended to include the coffee, motel, and cabins requirements, and the Lodge requirements shall be amended to require 28 spaces instead of 14. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move APPROVAL of Development Plan 07-14 "Della Terra Mountain Chateau" with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENIAL: I move DISAPPROVAL of Development Plan 07-14 because... (state reasonfor denial - findings). CONTINUANCE: I move to continue Development Plan 07-14 because... (state reason for continuance - findings). Page #6 - Della Terra Development Plan 07-14 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 August 17, 2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 - ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-14 - Della Terra - Metes & Bounds Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Statement o f Intent re fers to the Della Terra Mountain Chateau Bed and Breakfast, a fourteen room bed and breakfast. The Estes Valley Development Code limits bed and breakfast establishments to no more than eight (8) guests. 2. The terms and conditions of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Estes Park and Larimer County, Colorado dated February 1, 2000 requires that the Town consider annexation of all properties that are eligible for annexation. This development proposal meets the criteria for annexation. The Town must consider annexation of this property pursuant to the terms and conditions of the IGA. 3. The proposed development is subject to the provisions of Section 7.12.E Adequate Public Facilities - Water of the Estes Valley Development Code specifically with regard to the use o f wells for potable water. 4. The Development Plan does not contain the required Owner's statement. I f you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. N , y ery Truy Yours, 1 (1-111 ~ Grei{~ A. White GAW/ldr CC: Shear Engineering Fax: 970/282-0311 ' t MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: August 24,2007 Subject: Della Terra Metes & Bounds 3501 Fall River Road The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for Development Plan for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. Please see attached Development Plan Review Checklist c6mments. , Review Date: August 24,2007 Review By: Will Birchfield DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 3501 Fall River Road El Official street names and addresses shall be assigned by the Department of Building Safety. El Condominiums must submit (to the Department of Building Safety) any address changes before the preliminary condominium map is approved. Process fees will be assessed unless the address change is included with the original building permit application. U Due to the development's immediate proximity to the floodplain, an elevation certificate shall be submitted to and approved by the Departihent- of Building Safety prior to approval of the foundation. ~ All construction documents shall be prepared by Colorado Design Professionals and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U A detailed Code Analysis by a Colorado Design Professional is required. U A detailed site plan is required and shall include utility locations, setbacks, contours, drainage, landscaping, access, easements, etc. U A grading and drainage plan shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U Grading plans and permits are required prior to and are separate from building permits. A grading permit is required prior to any grading or excavation (Estes Park Municipal Code Â§14.12.030) U The limits of site disturbance shall be maintained and are restricted to within the property lines and/or to areas specified on the approved plans. E Prior to any excavation and/or construction activity, a detailed drainage/erosion plan to protect neighboring properties, public right-of-ways, floodplains and drainage areas during the construction phase shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Filtration of storm water is required prior to release from the site. Failure to comply with said approved plans may result in an immediate stop work order on the entire development. The final site drainage plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department. U The foundation systems, including mitigation of potential water problems shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. El Foundation setback and elevation certificates shall be provided by a Colorado design Professional, and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review- 3051 Fall River Road.doc Revised 10/17/2006- CB U A construction traffic plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works and Police Departments prior to obstructing or interfering with any vehicular traffic on public right-of-ways. C-Dot shall approve all construction activity on State Highways (Hwy 34, 36 and 7). U The developer shall specify the intended uses of the dwelling units. Are they intended to be private dwelling (owner ocbupied), long term rentals (apartments), or short term rentals (nightly accommodations), or combinations of the afore mentioned uses? U All new construction shall comply with all applicable accessibility laws. It is the designers' and developers' responsibilities to comply with laws that Town staff does not have the authority to interpret nor the responsibility to enforce, such as ADA, Federal and State Fair Housing Acts, etc. Additionally, the designer shall specifically detail how the proposed development shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the 2003 IBC, Chapter 11. Detailed accessibility specs are required- including, but not limited to: # of accessible units- existing and proposed, existing facilities and/or units, accessible routes (curb ramps, slopes, etc.) K I. ... El Approval of a Condominium Map is not an approval to change the use from short term (less than 30 days) to long term (greater than thirty days) and vice versa. Such change of use requires approval of the Chief Building Official, which will entail on site inspections and possibly life-safety improvements. U Compliance with the accessibility requirements of CRS 9-5 is required, and includes an implementation plan prior to issuance of any building permits. El Minimum one hour fire-resistance-rated construction is required between all dwelling units. U All appendages, such as decks and roofs must be shown on the plans, including building footprint details and construction details. U Building permits are required prior to any construction and/or remodeling. (2003 IBC, not UBC) U A Building permit is required for temporary construction office trailers. U A Building permit is required for fences over six feet in height. U Sign permits are required and are separate from building permits. Sign dimensions and location required. U All requirements of the approved development plan shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of approved variances shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of Planning Commission conditions of approval shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U A pre-construction meeting with Town staff and construction contractors is required prior to issuance of building permits. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review- 3051 Fall River Road.doc Revised 9/19/2006- CB ~ 1 Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, qsievers@estes.org Memo To: Dave Shirk, planner From: Scott Zurn PE. Director of Public Works & Greg Sievers, PM Date: August 31,2007 Re: Della Terra, Metes & Bounds, 3501 Fall River Road After reviewing the Development Plan 07-14 the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: 1. Acquire CDOT ROW/access/traffic permit and approval. 2. provide review opportunity to NPS? 3. provide drainage report 4. New roadway must meet EVDC standards. Turning radii of curves must accommodate emergency vehicles. 5. Roadway cross-section shall include 2' shoulders, and 4% centerline crown. 6. Provide construction drawing for PW review and approval. 7. Mail box cluster unit shall be provided at developer expense. (or at time of condominiumization) Light & Power: 1. Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2. No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3. We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4. The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5. Easements also need to accompany all primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 6. The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 7. Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 8. Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 9. All primary electric must be 4' deep with warning tape at 2'. All secondary must be 2' deep with warning tape at 1'. 10. We will need to meet with the developer to determine exact cost and location of proposed facilities. 11. Submit plans from the project electrical engineer for Town review and approval. Water: no comments based on the utilization of existing water wells for service. (Pending Admin. review) 08/27/2007 10:51 9704986772 LARIMER HLTH AND ENV PAGE 01/03 A LARIMER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 1525 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80524-2004 General Health (970) 498-6700 Environmental Health (970) 498-6775 Fax (970) 498-6772 To: David Shirk, Town of Estes Park From: Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Planner 4 fr Date: August 27,2007 Subject: Della Terra - 3501 Fall River Road - This proposal would allow conversion of the National Park Retreat properly to a Bed & Breakfast and wedding facility. Camping would be eliminated, but the coffee house, motel and cabin uses would remain. I reviewed the plan along with Tom Gonzales from our Estes Park office, and would offer the following comments. Water. Water for the facility is to be provided by the existing wells and an upgrade of the treatment and distribution system. Based on the proposed use, the classification of the water system will remain as a Public Non-community groundwater supply. This classification is derived from the standards contained in the Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Plans for the treatment and distribution system upgrades will need to be reviewed by our Department and the Colorado Department of Health and Environment prior to construction activities. In conjunction with that plan review, the applicants will need to provide information to demonstrate that the water system will provide adequate quantity and quality of water for the planned use. Sewer. Sewer service will be provided by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. We agree that this is the appropriate provider, and would defer to the District for any specific comments they may have about conditions for providing service. If the District indicates that a grease trap is required for these facilities, the food service regulations that we administer require that it be located outside the foundation so that it can be serviced without need to access the kitchen. Food Service. The Bed & Breakfast and wedding facility each involve food service facilities. In this case, we understand that there will be two separate kitchens. The applicants have consulted with our staff about food service requirements. Under Colorado law, facilities that are strictly limited to Bed & Breakfast operations are not required to meet standards for commercial retail food service establishments. To qualify under this exemption, a single rate for room and board must be charged, and the innkeeper must live in or adjacent to the residence. Note that this exemption applies to Bed & Breakfast facilities only, and not to hotels that serve continental breakfast. CO/AMITTED TO EXCEl!.ENCE 08/27/2007 10:51 9704986772 LARIMER HLTH AND ENV PAGE 02/03 , Food service for weddings and other events can typically be handled in one of two ways: by providing a licensed'commercial kitchen onsite, or by using a caterer that works out of a separately licensed commissary or kitchen. The Amelangs have indicated that they are going to provide a licensed commercial kitchen. We concur with that decision because it offers greater flexibility and enhanced safety for food service operations. This is especially true in Estes Park where many caterers would be expected to come from Loveland or Fort Collins - which is too far to transport prepared food at the required temperatures. Plans for the kitchen will need to be approved by our office at the time a building permit is requested. We can provide forms for the plan review, and are available to consult with the owners about any food safety issues. Noise. Noise is an issue that should be considered in conjunction with the development plan. Larimer County has adopted a noise ordinance that is designed primarily to protect residential properties. It outlines maximum decibel limits that apply during nighttime (7:00 PM to 7:00 AM) and daytime hours. The ordinance also prohibits the creation of a "noise disturbance", defined in part as noise of such a volume, frequency and/or intensity that it unreasonably interferes with the enjoyment of life, quiet, comfort or outdoor recreation of an individual of ordinary sensitivity and habits. The ordinance is available at: www.larimer.org/policies/noise.htm. Our experience with wedding facilities is that evening sounds from amplified outdoor music generate the most noise complaints. The closest residence is to the east of this property. It is very helpful if operators create a clear policy for clients to follow regarding hours of operation, amplified music and other noise sources. We do recommend that compliance with the County Noise Ordinance be include as a condition if the Planning Commission approves this development plan. Noise is also an important issue that relates to wildlife issues. Our office would defer to the Park Service and the Division of Wildlife for any comments they might have about this topic. Mosquito Control. This project will utilize a stormwater detention/water quality pond to capture drainage from the upper portion of the site. Mosquitoes will try and utilize the pond as a breeding site. While Estes Park has not been involved in the West Nile Virus outbreaks occurring at lower elevations, the mosquito species that transmit the virus is occasionally found at this altitude. Controlling mosquitoes is an important practice to prevent spread of the West Nile Virus. Limiting the designed water quality detention time to less than 72 hours generally prevents mosquito eggs from maturing to the adult stage. Additionally, regular maintenance of the ponds and outlet structures is necessary in order to keep them functioning properly. Stormwater Management During Construction. All construction activities are required to obtain coverage under a State level stormwater management permit if Page 2 of 8 08/27/2007 10:51 9704986772 LARIMER HLTH AND ENV PAGE 03/03 they disturb one or more acres of land. The permits are administered by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division. The main pollutant of concern for construction activities is sediment. The permits require holders to control or eliminate the sources of pollutants in stonnwater through the implementation of a Stormwater Management Plan, developed as parl of the application process. These Stormwater Management Plans must include best management practices (BMPs) that include treatment of stormwater discharges along with source reductions. Inclusion of the BMPs allows most permits to avoid numeric effluent limits. The permit application and guidance documents can be obtained by contacting the Water Quality Control Division (ph. 303 692-3500), or accessed through their website at: http:#www.cdohe.state.co.us/wa/PermitsUnit/index.html. Fugitive Dust During Construction. Colorado's air quality laws contain requirements for controlling fugitive dust emissions during construction activities. The steps necessary to comply with those laws depend on the amount of land disturbed, and the duration of the disturbance. The requirements are outlined below: â€¢ Development that involves dearing more than five acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically. reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. â€¢ If land development creates more than a 25 acre contiguous disturbance, gr exceeds 6 months in duration, the responsible party is required to prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an air pollution emissions notice (APEN), and obtain an emissions permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. The APEN and specialty permit application form for land developments can be obtained by contacting the Air Pollution Control Division directly (303 692-3100), or through their website at: http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/ap/downloadforms.html. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. I can be reached at 498-6777 if there are questions about any of these issues. CC: Pam and Darell Amelang Brian Shear, Shear Engineering Page 3 of 3 ~ UPPEI STRICTD \CUM_Ul.0 P.O. Box 568 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (970)-586-4544 (970) 586-1049 Fax August 21,2007 Dave Shirk, Planner II Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Della Terra, Metes & Bounds, 3501 Fall River Road Dear Dave, The Upper Thompson Sanitation District submits the following comments for the above referenced property: o Distance between manholes must not be greater than four hundred feet. e The Chateau/Wedding facility will require a minimum 1500 gallon Grease Interceptor. Adequate access must also be provided in order to facilitate inspection and maintenance ofthe grease interceptor. o The Coffee House, depending on its full intended use, may also require a Grease Interceptor. o All buildings utilizing sewer service must have metered source water, and those meters must be accessible to District personnel for billing purposes. Â® All private service laterals must be installed to District specifications. Any existing service laterals that do not meet District specifications must be upgraded at this time. o A pre-inventory (before demolition) of fixture units will need to be performed by a District representative in order to quantify credits on new construction. o Easement (Book 1573, Page 684) is a dedicated Upper Thompson Sanitation District easement and should be noted as such. o In addition, Plant Investment and Permit fees will need to be collected at the time the building permit applications are routed through the District's administration office. o Plans to construct will need to be submitted to the District, and upon approval, a pre-construction meeting will be scheduled. e A Warrano' Agreement and an Applicationfor Acceptance must be signed before the District will allow a connection to the system. 1 0 \ If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank You, 234 80Â£ .Chris Bieker, Operations Manager Upper Thompson Sanitation District cc: Pam & Darell Amelang Shear Engineering Dave Shirk From: Larry_Gamble@nps.gov Sent: Thursday, August 30,2007 8:56 AM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Della Terra Dave, I realize these comments are late. Just a couple of thoughts on the Della Terra plan: The parking plan is bizarre. The amount of paving to achieve the number of parking spaces they're looking for is excessive. The orientation of the solar panels needs to be done carefully so reflections don't impact hikers on the North Deer Ridge Trail. Set a limit on the amount of amplification or decibels at the outdoor wedding area. The area is immediately adjacent to the park, and amplified sound should not be heard at the Fall River Entrance to the park, the Fall River Visitor Center or beyond. Larry Gamble Chief, Branch of Planning & Compliance Rocky Mountain National Park Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-1320 Fax (970) 586-1359 1 Â· Della Terra Page 1 of 1 Dave Shirk From: Hice-Idler, Gloria [Gloria.Hice-Idler@DOT.STATE.CO.US] Sent: Monday, August 20,2007 4:07 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: RE: Della Terra No, I don't think so. The access permit would have been the only one that they might have needed, unless they want to landscape the ROW. Gloria Hice-Idler Access Manager CDOT Region 4 1420 2nd Street - Greeley CO 80631 (970) 350-2148 From: Dave Shirk [mailto:dshirk@estes.org] Sent: Monday, August 20,2007 3:47 PM To: Hice-Idler, Gloria Subject: RE: Della Terra Thanks Gloria. Will they need any permits from CDOT? -dave From: Hice-Idler, Gloria [mailto:Gloria.Hice-Idler@DOT.STATE.CO.US] Sent:' Monday, August 20,2007 3:27 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Della Terra Dave, . Based upon the TIS provided with the referral, it would appear that CDOT does not have the warrant necessary to require re- evaluation of the access. Projected ROW need on this section of US 34 is 75' either side of the highway centerline. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Gloria Hice-Idler Access Manager CDOT Region 4 1420 2nd Street Greeley CO 80631 (970) 350-2148 8/20/2007 ID C Della Terra Mountain Chateau B)% Â©EDÂ¥ E.71 Bed and Breakfast Development Statement of Intent : JUL 2 5 2007 ~ l-~ July 24,2007 i N Ui b 11 PROPERTY AND USE: Legal: Ptn. NW 14, Section 16, T5 N, R 73 W, 6th Principal Meridian, Larimer County, Colorado Full legal description attached hereto Zoning: Accommodation Current Use: Camping, Cabins, Motel, Coffee House Future Use: Eliminate camping, add 14 room Bed and Breakfast and approximately 160 person Wedding Facility All proposed uses are permitted within existing accommodation zoning PROJECT DESCRIPTION and DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATION: GENERAL OVERVIEW: The chateau/wedding facility to be built on the large existing mountainside cut out currently used as an area to park seventeen - 30 to 35 foot Recreational Vehicles. The current road being used by the RVs' to access the building site will provide access to the facility. The area currently used by RV campers, pop- up tent campers and tent campers, known as the "C" section, "B" section and "A" section will become parking areas for wedding guests. The east quarter of the building site, adjacent to the facility, will become handicap parking and accommodation parking. The area to the east of that, known as the "F" section, will become additional accommodation parking. The large area to the west of the facility, known as the "0" section, will become the outdoor wedding area. UTILITY EASEMENT: The current water piping, electrical, sewer, natural gas and low voltage wiring to the 60 campsites in the RV, A, B, C and F sections and "C" bath house is being vacated and removed. The new services will be provided to facility via proposed 25' utility easement. See site plan for details. New 20' electrical easement is being provided from west side of property to all new transformer locations to provided new underground single phase electric to existing structures, the chateau and the neighbors to the east. WATER: The property has five existing wells. The two lower wells will continue to service the cabins, motel, coffee house and "0" bath house which will remain in service for outdoor wedding use (the five showers in the facility will be vacated). The water being piped to the "G", "H" and "O" camping sections will no longer be in use, eliminating water sources dt approximately forty campsites and eliminating shower facilities for said forty campsites. The water usage from these wells will be reduced significantly. The two upper wells, currently servicing water to the "A", "B", "C", "F","L" and "RV" sections, approximately 60 campsites, bathrooms in 33 RVs, and the "C" bath house (five toilets, urinal, five sinks and five showers), will now service the 14 room bed and breakfast and wedding facility. All 60 campsites and "C" bath house are being eliminated. The two upper wells will be piped to new water treatment system in mechanical room of facility and then stored in two 2300 gallon cisterns, pumped to water tanks and pressure-tanks iii mechanical room. See mechanical plan for details. See water study completed per Town of Estes designated water usage formula regarding water usage impact. Study reflects reduced water usage. Interior fire sprinkler system, NFPA 13, designed and permitted by licensed engineer through the Colorado Division of Fire Safety, will provide specifications regarding interior water storage tank and pump system. Exterior fire storage water is being proposed at 45,000 gallons with a diesel driven vertical turbine UL listed fire pump, 1500 gpm, rated pressure 60 psi at 100%, fire hydrant located next to building. Fire Pump enclosed in heated, lighted building. ISO Calculations for 5a construction with NFPA 13 interior fire sprinkler system provided. Fire authority to specify final water storage capacity and pump information. Future domestic water line to be installed and stubbed out in proposed 25' easement. See site plan for details. Currently, town water is not available to the property. Feasibility is being determined regarding Town Water availability to the property. SEWER: New 8" sewer service line with required cleanouts will be installed via proposed utility easement. ' 0 ELECTRIC: Current primary single phase overhead electric will be placed underground from West property pole to pedestal behind current shop. Primary electric supplied from new pedestal to Chateau/Wedding Facility. Primary electric supplied to neighbors transformer on East side of property. Electric loads will be supplied to Town of Estes Park Light and Pbwer. Existing overhead secondary lines will be vacated and removed. New underground secondary line to all existing structures will be installed. If three phase electric is elected and feasible it will be installed by Town of Estes Light and Power, via power source near river, north in easement, boring under highway 34, (permit will be obtained), to building site. SOLAR: Solar will provide main power source for radiant hot water floor heat system and domestic hot water with natural gas back up to boilef systerris. NATURAL GAS: The new natural gas line will be sized and installed by Xcel Energy from Hwy 34 to building site in proposed 25' easement. LOW VOLTAGE: Conduit with phone and cable wiring to be installed in proposed 25' easement. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Exterior materials to be used are natural stone, hard coat stucco, hardiplank (concrete board) soffit and fascia, glu lam beams, minimum 40 year high dimensional shingle, all in natural earth tone colors. EXTERIOR TRASH DUMPSTERS: Exterior trash containers will be enclosed and protected in a bear proof building. EXTERIOR MECHANICAL: Exterior A/C units, electrical panel, gas meter, etc. will be screened from site with a wall/planter system, complimentary to the building. SETBACKS: North - 10' (borders RMNP), West - 10' (borders RMNP), East - 10' (borders private residence), South - 25' (borders Hwy 34) ACCESS: Access will remain the same as current. Existing drive will be used off north side of Hwy 34. A traffic analysis was conducted by ELB Engineering which determined there would be no impact from the project. 01 0 UTILITIES: Water: Existing five wells Electric: Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Gas: Excel Energy Telephone: Qwest All currently servicing existing business on property GRADING AND DRAINAGE: Per site plan prepared by Civil engineering firm, Shear Engineering AREA OF DISTURBANCE: Disturbance will be minimal. The use of existing roads and cut outs, currently covered in decomposed granite and gravel and already void of trees and landscaping, for the building area, drive and parking -areas Will maintain a minimal disturbance to the natural areas. LANDSCAPING: Existing natural landscaping with native vegetation and trees will be retained. Immediate courtyard area around chateau will contain a pavestone patio, protected flower bed area and a water feature. All disturbed areas will be planted with ground cover and returned to natural landscaping. SITE IMPROVEMENTS - BUILDINGS: Accommodation/Wedding Facility - 22,330 sq.ft. total Main level - 7000 sq.ft. Wedding room and balcony - 3200 sq.ft. Upper level - 6630 sq.ft. Lower level - 5500 sq.ft. finished SITE IMPROVEMENTS - STREET: Existing gravel drive will be widened to 20' and paved. A walking pathway will follow drive up to wedding facility. SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PARKING: Wedding Facility - Existing level camping areas directly below (south) the facility will accommodate wedding parking Bed and Breakfast - Existing level camping area directly to the east of the building will accommodate handicap parking and accommodation parking. Parking areas will be paved and striped. .. Â«b SITE IMPROVEMENTS - LIGHTING: All exterior building, grounds, drive, parking and landscape lighting to be M light, dark sky compliant. ANNEXATION: Feasibility of utilities and annexdtion is being determined by the Town of Estes. An annexation agreement will be needed prior to permit; even if it is determined that annexation will not occur at this time. Prepared by: Della Terra, LLC, Owner Pamela A. Amelang, President 14Â£'4 <G 11:63 - ESTES VALLEY 1 \ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICAflo 81 E Â©ED VE-~1 Submittal Date: ,~ JUL 2 5 2007 ~~ Type of Application ~ ~ â‚¬ Development Plan r Bgundary Line Adjustment Coidominium Map r Special Review - r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map E Rezoning Petition F Street Name Change 1- Final Map 13 Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map 13 Final Subdivision Plat 17 Other: Please specify 1-1 Minor Subdivision Plat 13 Amended Plat General Information Project Name De 11 4 / e-Yp-a. /4 o u n-1--c~ f A Ckateo-Â«_- 80:Q + 8.vea 12â‚¬ As- Project Description /4 Â¥00â€¢n, acia,v; Mo,Qu+~ob p~ps u) â‚¬-AD,'Mq 1-c, c.), try Project Address 3501 Fall (R:veÂ» flo Q.& 1 J=etes fly[-: 13'05/7 4 Legal Description m H ack *0 kewed-o Parcel ID # U.,) P 351*OaO#kection Township Range 73 ... Total Development Area (e.g., lot size) in acres 10,704 Existing Land Use Acr-BAA*nual,071,02;06Â£,p Nouse /CÂ«,71419 Proposed Land Use Ac, c# v...Aca, on/(Lefe. ~-Lose 1 Loed)d),~vg Existing Water Service 13 Town OC Well F None [3 Other (specify) Proposed Water Service F Town 19 Well E None E Other (specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD pr UTSD 13 Septic E None Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD 0 UTSD IT Septic Is a sewer lift station required? E Yes % No Existing Gas Service IX Xcel E Other F None . Existing Zoning / eri,vy,v. c*Dot-1-, ov, Proposed Zoning ~ wi, wi .A 064,71'3:â€¢n Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? 1-3 Yes OK No Site staking must be completed atthe time application is submitted. Complete? ~1e.e~:.;Yes~~i~No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person l.H,- "1 YAr-. 1Â£â€¢pic, Complete Mailing Address 3501 Fal 1 02.,'ve,-4'lk,0. . 15<-les (td.k, Coass/7 Attachments r, Application fee R Statement of intent K 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan g 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan X Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Parka P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev L ... Primary Contact Person is N' Owner r Applicant 7 Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) Da 1 10 0.~p,# j 1,1. C Mailing Address 350/ hal I A ivey (Rool) Phone 970- 654- 9647 or 776-493-6437 Cell Phone 770 - SLL - 7 924 Fax 970- 4'tb'- ?837 Email (Pam p. 1 0 wq 1 0 val,-06, cow, Applicant AY rOt , 11 C DO 10- r Mailing Address 3 50 / 1-al I OR< rep- Rect.J) Phone 770- 556 - 466 3 Or ? 70 - 97.8 - 59.37 Cell Phone 918 - ~Al * 94 624 Fax 970- 11?9'- 95737 Email (p avn e-Ic: p~y 1 0 14400, ccÂ·Â»n Consultant/Enginee, Ckm:;17- weet,s + Assol. 1 CLiv,/ - Sk,oa v. ;15#10,Â·Me,Â»F,~~ tructÂ·ova / 1~ailing Address #702> S. Col/202 , 50,4Â£11 9234 S . Col/ege, Su,An Phone 22 0 -61 9,2,1 p C, CO ~ r22 4 -4 33Â¥ ,=c' 03 Cell Phone 89 sas Yos#-5 Fax &05 - 06 8.0. ~.*2 -03// Email ~ u, u>W . Ck â‚¬,2 -e,~j''heâ‚¬ Y, '9. APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWSchedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats 1,545*FERI, and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owner~|*41plighU=gi~~Im*46*iMah mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first |Mgon an application for development. |l[MT JUL 2 5 2007 I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS havld})4~â€žrt. - Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: De-//c. TevY-Q , LLC- AppliCant PLEASE PRINT: De, I le- -1-k v ra , 1 L C- Signatures: Record Owner ~~~1--vro-.~~A ~~ - <109,651.JLâ‚¬&91/ 7-,lk) Date 7 / 6291)07~ Applicant lj~ ato_ G. . -c-y._-.U,â‚¬ 9>â€žo. Dge -7 1 0-H (07 . . I-. I C. 01 . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. ~ In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) I I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. * I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. I I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 71*1 6 -14rÂ« , ALC Applicant PLEASE PRINT: 11.1 k Terra, AAC Signatures: Record Owner i ~~â€ž_02. u,,c . ~/~-~4-1+ /PAR.J. Date 7 I all /07 AU 1 Applicant (Fc,-vi,A Q.QC:- Ol. 4â‚¬04-~, , (~,de, Date 7/JÂ¥/07 V -~IE Â©EDVÂ¥)' JUL 2 5 2007 ~ Revised 06/26/07 0 0 hh 7-7- ID LO .OO 00 00 Poo -00 S. Carie 529 S. 31 st Street Colorado Spr CO 80904 Owner 11 Address City, State, Zip Shirley S. Scroggin Charitable Trust c/o Curt W. Buchholtz, Co-Trustee 3450 Fall River Road Estes Park, CO 80517 H.W. Stewart, Inc. 3 Mirada Road Colorado Springs, CO 80906 Mountain National Park Vaughn Baker / Larry Gamble Estes Park, 1 L. & Jane A. Sanem 3355 Fall River Road Estes Park, Wapiti Park Corporation H.W. Stewart, Inc. 3450 Fall River Road Estes Park, CO 80517 FBO Rocky Mountain National Park k L-ZO da enel ellea 2Â£96-96, Dal=1 itt M g; / mi Â¤$â€¢0**DÂ®!mEÂ®jil 6Â£99-Â£6* (0Z6) Â£&909 Oan!0103 '>IBVd S31S3 Am vhhit !1~!i ZI908 00 'SN!1100'1.3 OVOM Ba/\Ikl TIV=t X09Â£ 3]Â°1131 1[[0 11 -ONI 'SBAOH MO.LSnO 12 41 O LUI BlaZZ X08 -Od 011 'Vhly31 V-1130 9 Iii 11 4/13!10%19 05 mo >IRmfUIRLEUU[D-Immi 8 2 *81.NnOO 11IH 1SV:I>IÂ¥388 9 038 11 - m lilizili: 0 -~ 2 41 5 Z 8301In8 AV31VHO NIV1NnOIN Vhlbl31 41130 m~ 16,1 9 1 0 W i,W|Mu Ill!..3 9 5% 23 W fT- .il IÂ· Â· ~ -~-.PL 44 W. f : : 6 2Â· ~}91 21Â£1 - 1.re 1 1 1'.L-/'Ji- 1 11 11- --11 6=11 It - -1.L 4%*,RN - -, 112 *v,1 -4 - Ir -5-6?1 Â·-fyi-refirtit' !lili -Ful r r__ 19 /4 :L.-19-:91 7 4*kN}* 1, 1- .- .1;118 WIT@Li-! 2 . /5/5 . 4 .1 4-M h---,RE Ak .1..7 / / 1 1- 259Â» -Â¥44:f 1-Z KV=~32 \Nitz! AN ..2.,4*9 rol - 41\/ ....INX 15 + ': ,~.~~~' 6;mi /3- I Z.. 11 rillil rb i r--77 -1 h,_1 5 f rE-/ 4#9/1 -1 , Fullitia A "R..:.-l{.' ~ i~~T~~_.,-~110+f-f -51*Bilift F71 ,2.z Â· Utlyâ€žLi U) Z *19- :94 Â·!Wv .i... ~10}NE*5 0 1/E ~-43(~ %5:.Ir:igfl ...r 'lit,1 N/lity?M CO 1- 34*273-4&-32]k.41...:~. 11Â·~. .12019,2-7,L Â·IIi C,-tÂ·-* ~ Z< 010 12* OM ,Â·:. lf**41. I . Â·11'< 11/. 05 < 3),2,;WiLL24Â·.-Ii-~2. i.L. I~~46;F1Q:B#i~rA714 i--'d lili ' - '- -!Ifir LT,2 e.. 'â€¢A 'el,i,â€¢0 Fleâ€¢ .i, r < 0- D CO 2.-: b :)- c. 2 .f.Â·>Nh'j.c LÂ· f {rle o .c 2~~t.+-Ac,~~~&4ilt -U GUI S B .Â·/.~.:; iT77-l-1~7:3 T~481- LU t Q) z n m or -1 2 4,Â·r.lt Nf"1-""19#Kik.i Hk IZE! i 1-k I I P.Wu lk- 10-1-+316Â»Â£=1413%'nirly.rd#*191 3-:*mityÂ£202(FU-,4Wnd)1~*AN GO Ill > 3436--{5-4-Â·4(24#.81 JJN Dika/#aph Rt 0'-'-:â€¢0*.Â·- r.:j: Al-r .-41 146.+F*mu Alm IO - -c.---4-' --':Â·.~79416*(240fflflutfik J ~- -2'kytmi#-norm-,YI[IfPUL~ t ' 1- W D J. ---ft 614/.M+.' Â¤ - mact, O - at LL Of I - Â·Â·Â· .'25Â£1~( f . ' f z35 2% . O1- -.. ,43:' .~~lacl ../~B'~~e Z - 6<.O-01-11151- LU W j ..~3:.IFi ~~1294421Â¢~?**rft 0 ~OfC/)D~ ~ I " h 122 - *4,%**Mt f*bkir 2Â«Â·J-- ... 1 1%1)4*2449/. 0062990 0 5~259% 15:2 282<m LL I 1-It:c- i :683*/ Il 1 I -1 OEZ O* uÂ«*t_ 37912 EÂ®22~Wgg=fae Q) 1-Lu Â»b'A+ 1})' - n of I .7 Lua hY,4 1 1 ICZED LLU~Z~bDDZE-HO O<111<0_01-1-05 1.LI UJ U) 390 =*M 1 Â£ D U) MOCOLLOLLI - rul LL COR#J[Â£ i iLLJ (/) i ]l <O 22- c_*NFI d I I , I i i < m ' I , 0 - - .'UGU Â·Â·i 01- .1 1TZ/*tENET*j . Â· = C\1 m 91-LOCD CD CON 00 C) T- Z U) m Ill 9 - i Â·4hffl ArÂ«rl?Ad= X LU LU LU LLI Ill LU U-1 111 111 LU LU LLI ~ CD(DOCD(.90(9(5(9(DCDO 1~':,~~,~.<'~~â€žT, ,9,9-~-2224Â»53{E z <<<<<<<<<<<< . -rÂ· ,i,.,r _'t,- f , - 0 YtkhqtrisreÂ·Â· 21Â·ya - O.0.0-0-0-0.0-0-0-0. OLOL 1 6 0 6 k 39Â¥d 19 CE>IDEHo 3A31 bladdn SWVN 133He m A o ED Â© El' Cl ~- LOE 1 1 d39 ~ -erra - ta in Csateau 3501 Fall River Road, Estes Park, CO 80511 R OF SECTION 16, T5N, R60W, , COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO akfaet NÂ¥ldhlOO13 9 NOI1VGN NOI1Â¥001 13NVd IlVA 3 (193M 9 1 13 (H-INON 9 H.LAOS) 2Â£86-96* :Xy:1 48 @00OmmUYWUMAMMW 6â‚¬99-Â£6*(026) Â£&908 OCIVEO-103 '>INVd SELLSB LZ909 00 'SNI1100-13 OVOB BaAIB 11Â¥8 LOSâ‚¬ Â°317 6*[io -ONI 53,40HWOiSn0 "6 ., ':alÂ¥*g.=,gf- , El ut @Lazz X08 -0*d 011 'Vhlhl31 V-1130 91) |! 0.5*%1!1 k. E " Bl==E 1 4 jillici~~Zillial 3 8 4#Z Aht-LNROO 11!H 1SV=I>IVE]Z38 9 038 hl3O-ling AV31VHO NIV1NnOIN Vhlhl31 V-1130 Â¢EÂ®Â®Â® , 4 2 2 .0 /9 Â¥ 22~ buqhh""MEN O: O 82 ' .g-,06 31--: ....9 .OS ...9 .9-,ZZ Â·903/6 Â·ONE Zed GlWd â€¢0-â€¢9 .../ ,9-,M ...1. .0.9 WH,r,-19 (Slaig ,) 921 .. .4 ...â‚¬1 .4 .e-,61 ./1 11 â€žr,it Â· 91-rvm,/ ......Â·Â·â€¢ .Â·Â·:--.Â·1.3>-Â·Â·ccz_ i......Â·'...:.Â·-. 2 971Â¥m I 9 ~ 91-1,m ..M b 1908!=I â€žt,â‚¬ ~ 3 -, .4 -71*3-:7 131 ".21 1 .,19..â‚¬1 1 .44.41 .-----1 ~Â·.. ... \ ..10-1Â£ 1 . .' 1 r bi - U-iii.j *R-44 .,Tr-* .4. '1: 11 -ID C .35, :; 42 - .0. -4 UDE: i # 3 111-11 1, 4 i! f 1 .Â»=-:=-=i====11=-1:-AS &4*W -nke,==4 : 1 ip .O-'.t Z-*0~ 8 1 : u,===t=--:=:=:=:=~.====i:=:-=,1 i Â·:-t' -- -- 9,6 83*gl.4,1~9Â» ai~--r,~-~.1 . r --0---7 - - 11 . Â· -'i SliC)cl I SIVE#-030 C' P t Â· 9 .-Â»- 4 : .:--4--,/sTÂ·rvi 19028 ] 1 U.\ 11 \ \ 1 : ~ r <r' 7 110-Dllim \. . Â· =r:= Â· '.Â· . Â·:mÂ·Â·Â· â€¢.Â·-â€¢.- .IH Â·:Â· Â·Â·: â€¢.-'1.Â· f.â€¢Â·7>< 1-11:IÂ·..'0~Â·'1: f. . 1 -, 1, 1 liz.. 4 Â£ :.. --2-:i-- lj':' . H i , ..e-01 9 :2:2:-:Em:~=i 4 f .412-,9 1 ...0 . A il r + 4 9. :. ~ :: ~~~ ~; if li 14. .--1---- , , i -O H = I 7 744 :7 I ~ #i 3 i . ....... . i ji :. 1. p a- ,Â»,a -acr El 9Â· ~ b LE' . I. 1 1 . - 3 40 : rgl# P==-1.-1 . 4 :.-1 r,rn,1 - 10'.1 .*L-11 m ~ 'P - i ..............1 . .|01 8 . ...... 1 1! -- 4 ..0-,11 ; Â¢ ....91 :------ 1 r -. i .2<#233 1 9- ... E 8 . . . 1 1 , -4 : . : : 10.9-,I 1.11-,01 ' 1! - r i 1 ...94 Lribtli#44 I =9 2 -1-1 3 1 4 9 b e I ' :112 -11, ,-------~ 9 g . -1 .0..9 .f.0-,2 . , 1 .. . , ../. .1 i 9 4 Â» g Â¥' 4. 1 .o-lf- .O-19 Â· \ 4. ./ 1 ----_.~--.~-3.-Lip{-21-7 al 1 : 1 liâ€¢ 0 2 :-------, 1 ''> i /5. . ' _I // 2 / / I 9 oz 1 - h -' h $ a fi ' : - 1 5 --7- i : 1 ' < ,/. . 1 1 9 , 1 4 : 3 -TB 6 2 : ; 1' : : 2 .--.ir-I-/ : mq --i E . M:i I W~ IP I ..25 I. -1 W 2 -1 -- .-t c .0-11 9 .0-19 -221]hi . '' . 0 L .1 1 -4-, .It-,01 ./1-,01 = 9-1, 11..9-1â‚¬ ,&.El | ' 1 k : -1 /b i , '%0-,11 ~ .9-,L .z. m~ if 1 4 Â·i . - 61 ~- 4 1 i Â·%0-,11 j'' -f-t-g i 4 .4,-, . f .. eâ€ž-.,: 4 9 g 3 NE â€¢.1 i; . 0 -=icti=:=:INF-=EFAbl'=~====i=i:~~=~:=~=~==k+=zratz! 1 3 1 S 2- : ,1 1, 1 - 2 + 6 1 1.-2-1.-:~ ~ ~ Â·.--tteÂ·{* :.... .:: i :: .1 9 1 --1./:1.... 4..12Dr......:...:r....:f Utilij.--c-,-6 ; 3 i 1 i *91-: --- h.. 1 1Â©bl* .C..C ,-Â·t_~i.,-- r:~~..___~~,~---- 1 1' :ife.S MrÂ¥210 Maa**m.1 3=t: .FI?r=L=zz.-s=:=:=:T:; - 1 4 01 41 4 *,gym 1902,Id IP' 9 .0-19 Al-- , --22)1-Lim---___ 0 Â· ' ' .0-1. . : e _4*#=4 Zi.ctited:'ye,-5. A ,Â· : -,1 1 9 9 - ~ I ... 1 E E t ' .2 16-.L Z 9 . LY, â€ž/< â„¢ b El . .0 - . .. 4 I,, . 19 di / 0 :Z 16 1 Z 4 M 1. le -4-.4/li* F 9 I' r m. d) 0 1 1 : :51 : _-1 u/b i *.rh. 0 4-= uft'-- k.\ M 1 1 / .t- 0 . .E-,M 2 0 l_-1.-: ~--i-0744-3-*%9 + ..~ Y.1 -'+ I *.- I *,r *9 9 ' â€žÂ«â‚¬ z â€ž4,~ j -U,0-,0, I m 1 ,r,â‚¬IA I -ng * . . Ir," . in Z ./ .r Xj . 1 :- 1 .....> 1 -2 i =1 i: 1, 1 0 " f.â‚¬ .9-,St , 10 -3 Â¥ 1 >/<ST i .4 1 5 1 4Â«.1 .9 j .. k\i . 9 ?\ 1 1.~.'. 1 9 11 ....... 2- -*r ~ t L 177~ g,Nrjoi - x % *? ..wele W.g ... -1 ... 4 0 - . 9 f 3: ... 9 e. 1 .. - 9 Or = 9 - ' . 1. , m g 1 -i . I i 12! :--1 f y . 1 1I 3// t I . 1 I J -0.97 :o--c-. -1 C , 1 23 0 &!il ' 1 ~ O |U 1 =3 f-; - N V .9-,51 ~ Â· I -Z~Jil ...i---3 1 1 - r Â·. . 4 5..A -3 M 11 F...11.-----i , 1, 1 m- Ill 1 . 111 1 â€žÂ¥-,El .OLL ..9 10 f .r.Ot Â»-,9 1 9.9.0 b it .Ill f â€ž42-,a i b ! Â·Â· . 1 1 : 2% Â¢ . '19..9 .e..S I f .-4.9 1 D T 3 .0,119 .....01 4 11 . - . D Z â€¢ I 144 ~: i.-19.7.= 11 9 B ./ 3 H=- K.V , ~ 9 'i~~ ------- i~ -1 ~--1* . <i . ~,g-,OE D ion O- m ..2..OE i! li !- ---1---I T -1 il---T-f ii[ 4 kij!- -f} "~ 5 --- : 1 -zx O 0~ 919,Or BOO-1=I NIVW ~; , * ~glll ~LaJe*Va IC.. :W.-,/ ..5: -t..4...,., .3: ' .. - . 4 212 4 F 1 44 1 L -.----.u 1: 4] . Ill w 1- 12 111 4 ~ Trm Â·Nna=i MONÂ·,1.8 -Â· 30 ..41â€ž,S 1.â€ž I i I 4. " Z:i .9-161 .0-.9 1,90 85 2 31" ...91 .0-19 . 0,=a- Piz 6 - <r b:b 9121! 9 d 44 6 Z 8553 1 8* ' W a .0- â‚¬E $ 1 , 1 NOI1VCINAO=I 917,Â·m IlvaNnod Oll,cl 114 WESYâ‚¬ 11Â¥ alagwnN gor Â£007 rn:D 1/1,9/L-Il CE) gunN 13BH9 NOI1 no=1 Della Terra Mountain Chateau 3301 Fatl River R oad, Estes Park, CO 80311 FLUSH) 1|-1/07 LVL (FLUSM) 4 Breakfaet RETAINING WALL W/ STONE NAGE 8CUPPER 30Â¥N aaol=' 8'-20 V 5'-0. . 3'-0. 5'-0' 0 3 -2' Â©NINIâ€¢rlaal 'ONOO ldEOXE 314MN 133MS . 9 .0-9 . - . 2Â£96-86k :Xy=1 4, I . iU043Â§mU!331Jlmil*gl# 6Â£99-Â£6* (026) 1 1909 00*IO1O3 '>IMVd SELLS3 Ill 4 11-:1' 11|Ii Â°)1Â°71 1[1111 -0-, 'sa,-0- wolsno | |~ *lilli: ~ Â£2909 00 'SNI11OO-13 avou hl3Alkl Tlyd 109â‚¬ Â¥ 8LZLZE X09 -0-d 011 'VEINal Â¥1130 g mN *IERÂ©11 j iii %@ligs 1 Atil.NnOO 11IH 1SVDIVEING 9 038 ~ 2~ 5 9 kl301In8 nV31VHO NIV1NnOIN VHB31 Â¥1130 al E- 2%/ 0 201*12(?litzill!*di 0: Zi .0-.9 1 .0-'E f ..1 * ..1.9-1.E .r/ .e,1 .0-,9 ...2 *0*.9 ;~ "--; 81"-,L. . il :--*-~; â€¢1 Ll_1-_I> , J ., Â· \\ . . 4.- . ..VÂ·-iÂ·--Â· 9 .Fig 1 - .11-'' 4 ..1 k -: 6 a :-l_: i-flo< 4 A ' . . . ....: .....:.......r..t.1 ..... - lEN *d)1 *14 2 1 -1-3 ..'tu -Z b 3 2 2 0 9 @ 8#:. ..3 -~1.~li-} 1 9'1 t }41Â» - 1 . 3. a El ; 1224+ j . mgo 0 2 E .r --4-Lha 1,146- 9 ~ .9-r 2 k Z b . U.19 I aZ m 4." y. 11)<3 : 8& Â·Â· 4 3 8 -1-Ill .4-,94.4. Al 2 340 C f 41' di 4, %,4.- 1 . .Ii I i AliaL ~~ 4 11 3, 1 41 1 1 1. .9,,Â·-9 -0,4-- 'r:52) 2 11'1 ,-1 fi.* f le 1- Ut J LU \9 9 . U==21 - 1 \\ & 1. 1 i@. 2* 9--4 3 1 JO f MI- 1 %%~~ 4~i'-ii-i *'- .410-1, 9 v / Ill P 6 %,6, *-,L ~ ; , -11: i 2.--!i]@ a f / i/,02- 91 + - 6 E -g 2 0 - â€¢:111 â€¢ O/ It- 'III : 1:1/ /%*rÂ«. : :. 0 2 - 2 -ti,& I / -7.I L. :9 14 Z. til- ' U I , ,n, Â· r ,) -5,1 . e . - 1, r:==r j , CE Ill d) md b -44, 3._~~ 9 01 Ill . i..:'t~ :. 1- 3 4 i iI : A 'fl MiEVId//te,Â« - - - . -Tr-- /.r,+ 1 I , 0 -1 1 2 2 Â·. 5 1\ 14 1 /7 NX, 1 . ' .51\ /., : . 'U Â· .â€ž.9 . â‚¬ i , . '0' ' t..../....4-------- -' - -1 . O-E I .â€žIS .4 ~ ., ' .5 ZE- 1 3. Â»-4-Â»11 11 310-1 1 . -1. Lâ‚¬ 5 ' ' ' ''14 9:2 :1/1 , 2 1 , lim Gy im b . . 1 w .9-2=i 1 .911-Â·11 - t Mil ' 3 I . -22:;ZEZZE:3//3~E]ZE '. ~ ~ '40 I - 4/ Z LL i 9. i 1 11 "- -1-, 9 . 01 -,0 1 k .~ .0-1Â£ 1 ....9 1 +1- .r.9 .O-,E: b j I . I â€¢ 4 \13 WOOht Al .6 '9 2 - 1-2/. A, 11 Â·Â· -. 4 - il i All-â‚¬\ -1 . . A , h. 0 4 u - - L .;.3,/ 9 ill f.<7& t 4,/9- , 4 V : 1 41 9 A- : ZI , F,1-3, 111 6 , \ V .12. 1 r--a=dC. 4 09Â¥te-h. : 0 ~ 3 - 4(< 1.0 ...\ <r o / i.9 t 7-- -d) N:F . 4 - P I I - 11 Ue V: \ 6---" I i -1/ - 3 h UE , 1 1 IV.. -tijt) : i#* m , 3 . Ir-- E .b / \ ik-*_Ri--2 i .2 = i W ../- ./ ' . _ Â· ~/S==za C. Â· - I-- ./7 U ks#fÂ·-"-------Â· 1%4 $ * 1 Â· '111. d . X..41 I 1 V 11 - 11 1 J'Â· -'. d, It :- lk:&11 1 9 -42 j -2 i! =9 .I: d i yi El--3. 11 11 -0 11' 7 /4111 91-.â‚¬ 1, 0:...:...: /1 - "rf"r.r, 1 -4 ; 1__ /1:...5(4,zA,7/')\~ - - . L I. -.5- 000/00 O..P b -V + bh . .t IIi R ET A-1 ------ - d - .0-49 .0%, I ; A,L I 4 1 ./1 - P US : 0 \- 11 R N 4 :-4-Z .3.,â‚¬ .elf-~ida 4* I ~ ..71 â€žr.L J.C>-1â‚¬. ...9 1.0-If - ME~,ti 4 f .,i, F Â· .eL-.9 .11 'E / Gr \N . 4 9 .gig f.e-,r 20 11 t .9-1. - . 9.1 .r.91 -%..i P L- l -- .t-,C . ' .. . -1 = , 13 - ./ 4 1- 1 h. '11 in ; ...â‚¬ 4 .r.11 ~=*5 E--- . RE . : f.i/0 ~05 Jel. A : .. 2 It~ 1- l. 355: ,"-11,7-1, â‚¬), \i -w *7661 : 1- 53Â§16 L ...2 - 6 6 U - 1 4 7.4 *#firjai-1 : itit 1 Lf ./Â£327,- ~FE 111 H 8 -- :2**\ A B,91 ' '1Â· I - .*S-,11 .9-.0 11 9 \ ~2% \%%=------ ,"14 9 ., 0 Iâ€¢I ..1 11 + I 1 : A 11 -,1 11 A-: NA:: *\A:,02\ : 9 M 111 6 ' ' i i 7--------r**4-**64,. . Omo 1 11. 9 2 1-4 2 219-, 1 01 9 luz 0 - 1 . m fl ,_ 3 Ul d) r 4- tul .RE-,L A ' f...14 1-44Â·50-J:.1 111Â· U' 2.Â·1- Â·Â· , 7 2 - Ill'- ./ 9 = - lEi 2 dE . , Z m -z 1 30Â¥&10.19 91â€¢IlacIErn f OFT ~24 2 * =. 0 1006 0 " , "' .;19-,8 4 i Iii I 2 1 y Iti 1- lit 111 L . M 929 .412-,â‚¬1 I _tll!! - - 4#R#li .01-,Â¥1 1-aL .9-,41 .9-,51 1 1 * 1,â€¢â€¢11 mo 1N3IN3SVB ... I .% NagwnN gor BWVN 133MS Ata ODIOatiO 01 ...IC 44" 4 5'-4" . 4-6' . 3'-4' . 4%8'. . ,-0. 2 3-0. 0 0 3'-0, 0 5'-0. 12'-â€¢: 6%0' . 3-0 S'-0Â» 6 5'-1/2" FRAMED WALL ~ 5'-1/2" FRAMED U,IALL ~ BNO19 /m ldEIhll Della Terra Mountain Chateau SUITE 14 NI 117 :21014 3501 Fall River Road, Estes Park, CO 80511 W~~6~~N:j:'::ALL TO RETAINING IUALL WITH Bed 4 Breakfast 11 = 1191/â‚¬ ita, I gl aline 9>INÂ¥1 2 93 0*Â¥Lld. 9..Â¥.M .21Â¥m AH.3 o- ,<1/=& OH HZ)Â¥3 14 amistcl NO!-1-VI.IhIO=INI Gl 2â‚¬96-864 XV=1 19 5 '11 1 1.1 @. 6Â£99-Â£6k (0Â£6) ZL609 OC]VEO-100 '>tknid 93163 Iii q "kit !1'il 2909 00 'SNI11OO 13 C]VOW k:13/\11 -11Â¥:1 LOSâ‚¬ Wh..:@W...5. 8LZLZE X09 '0-d 011 'Vhlhl31 Â¥1130 ONI 'SabNOH WOISAO AN-LNnOO 11IH 1SV:I>IÂ¥3238 9 038 11! 4 11111!41:2 ~[1Â®2.12*]l-2-121!J~ ht,lil"11111QI blaoling nV31VHO NIV1NnOIN Vk:IB31 V1130 .,10..E ..,a 1 EZZED:z=, t 11 Icitl-:li m 4 11 1 f-----.1 0 - Al 11 ip' 2 = .0-,G 1 9,14*!Om Â» 0 - ArÂ·Â¥ 4. E. : = 1 -- 1 3 9,NEW 1 h.*7 v 0 , 2 11 i ZI .*i U --, 141 Â·rri N -4 !--i-60117 14 . 4 4 " 1 5 I ''&* 1 61 f."11 -8 1/1- ge - 2-,Z -11' %1-19 . . J,â€ž4111- r.,9 In11'11 1/1 111 11/ \[-S' i-:Â§ = al 1 (Â·&.Inal.!26:UX.. 1- , #w 2,al,40 993Â»11* 1 *I ..le ~ .1 @11 reav rn 1111*Or,2 = 0 = 1,1/Le.9. 1 /01 â€¢ 1 1,-" I F11><a h Z ll><E ! / / 9 I N , / ' ' / / 3 / / ' m / = 2-f~ = D . i -/ 6 I I ZI d 0 t --- -------------60------Ed----------D - ---------- : <2 Ul 111 V 4L ~ -:F 3 1 , I. I 0 1 1 -- 9 . 4 51-1 -1 ' ' C 0 . / I ' ........,.WILMJEEERE957~252EEEEEN:*EME'%*6225=5555*25EENN-/fl--EimU~Ul _ C % 3 3 m 11><3 4==jâ„¢- cur---â‚¬3 .~, i â€¢.Â¥>.â€¢ <r~ .........,.e. j ..1. â€že-,I .9-,L .11-,9 .It-,9 .4,L .en. m .*e .O- 7â‚¬ .9... .Ins . .OIns .0-IS .9-,6 Â· .O,9 1 4 1.- 1 357Â¢ =1 339 - Noll/CEN,Â·103 ~ , - , 1 -1.- U " -t. . .Â·Â· Â· 4 Â·C>.9 ..9-191 F.. .M 11 r- 3 3 i .4 -9. U.. 1 -|OR M b I .. r 1 f L-K R . : 1-12 .411-19 ' 2.2 h .9.,il & .. v I il 1 2 1 1\: 1/ T . f li Pl ."-111 11 " 41 7 1 d ...01 ....11 . .1.-,9 :,1: d) -1 1 4 3 a â‚¬ 0 2 . U. 9- J 1Â·9 ' . : .9-1. 1,0-1/1 ..8 ..12 i,ot-.*E - ,9-19 .01-,IS 1 5,+J-Â¥. Â·,/00 ~__1231=-2/ .40Â·1â€¢....Â·0'â€¢ .... 24 ...- 3501 Fall River Road, Estes Park, CO 80511 WHHHi~H""11,1,1"11*1*1*1*1*1*1*"11111*11"""H 1.0/ 81 lei i errel i-10 63'-1' 34'-10 ..1 2Â£96-96* :XV:1 MES 1 /,3 1 @IZIDWRRVWRD 5111Â¤@i 6Â£99-Â£6k (026) 8908 OCIVEO1O3 '>IBVd SEUSa BE v mÂ®!1 1~ ~ *liill}dI 'ONI 'S3KOH WO1SnO 18 4 1!illillmilig ... = E- 27.909 00 'SNI11O0 13 OVOht kda/UB 1-TV:1 LOSE 8OZE X08 0'd 011 'Vhlhl31 Â¥1130 0:? R H ,!493 0 4 J lu *211Nn0011IH 1SV=I>IVEINS 9 038 9 < z M /1 .1 830-Itn8 nÂ¥31VHO NIÂ¥1NnOIN Vhlk:131 V1130 0,@, m . 9 0 9 MO .Ch- .O-,9, .O 9 .... ...5 .IS .O-S ..... .... .O-,01 .'..1 .0-91 .onaL .... .O-I .O/ ./.g .... . 1,1 .... -0-S .CM ~ f i = = U einim! 11;;$â€ž131 immimm; -MH= i r 1&.9 : /4 VE ' F. = = 93htÂ¥ NO oma ' ,r E. 1 :a J J L d .9.â‚¬ 31 1 -: 4212 3.11 11 . -ate 6 .0... 3 Iii 0 - i 1 11 1 7.. 1 +-An 1 - - Z iM 4 ------il m 1 r 0- 2 2 ..... i e. : ~â€¢*- I ip ' 1,1130 R p Z LL ill<6 . illi .9 ... i :13 i iii V ! 2 9 1 4 1 4 ! :6 Wy 11 1 " 11 - . 4 " . 1. , 4 9 I : -4 %1â€ž 1 1 " --7 & 21 .0, i 2 % 1 - I $19- - & Fin ' 01 I v . 2 - 4 , 9 3 0 & \ 2 Wal I " --- 1. I 1 11 ~\3 Â»39 ' Cccj . 0. I , 4 k 30Â·.1 - â€ž I #im , --- ., * M " r. 1 4 1 3 n 32 -u- .0. [1 az " 3 1 ''4;~111 2 .1 H -ly.:0 . 5 4' 2 .,g . . e , .. I .. 1 . 9 4 : Â· ~ 24, 11 - :9 .0..â‚¬ 1. , 10. 1 . , g Nt'11,17Â¢4 h g . ==i,i:~i~=: ='12= ELL. -I p' E t i, 4 i â€¢ . :~1 9 '' 1....1 1,4.11. 1 ta ./ 1.r . 4 A l ..... .1 W -- * '' 14*. 2 : li '941 .4,h~ EE. 5 : .0-,9 g J~ 11 *1 b - 11 9 Y 9 y --m- k W t~ 4 E 9 Â· OIl:C =.A-r : 3 * . .9./.A I -c,a---â€¢â€¢ - 09 = 2 :' 1 12 - ~ _11 10,E .0, m. . -- -:9 -9 ...1 1 .O,9 .M - r 0 '42 E- *,0 ..01-,1- ,19 , 9 111 ~ ... g ...11.1.--------- ............4 4 . I M- 1 - - ; JOC m,9 4 , Â¥*ga JI ? - VISM , I .9 S I . - 1 1 - 9 oo , - 9 . 1 . . .... ':i > ./ ..0-151 4 ...â‚¬ %4,4,44 . 1 *,1,15*!m:111 9 0; *5 4 " Â·Â· u d z :; r- .. A \C.vi b O 'i :: ..... 1 11 b â€¢â€¢ .â€¢lor,Â¥ - .Â«A ..-.' 0 . , ...1.29 i X . Â·Â· 1 :3 A '; I - 'PEI 8 I : i--, . act.â‚¬ : 1 . 1: 0 9 .... 1* H 11. 0 ,1 41 Â· 'id. 4 ., /1 1, :: 3 /:i .: - 11, & 6-' 4 : O/ 1 .1 .m I. 1 .1 1~3271'r J . p .9 ./.1/ .... 1.-*-- 1: 1 alll C. . 1" I Â·14* 19 h.,14,11 <cw.,...., 1 221 9 -9 .ru.0,1 ,##C-C-%.-4.-----11:lk. ---- ---4___~~~~~~4 -v#---2-E---- 1-d FE:it f * - A H . ------ ----- ----- - ---------- ----- -- 4- -----41,8- . 1 1/ r .... 2.-- 5-he- & . 1 2. Ou- e i t::DR n \ /2 h ..1.1. inÂ«.19 1 1 0 11-: 1 34 1 ' EpdA - .../.- -- --1- + * Ed :EN .0, I ./ :1 . ... , ------ - 3 ib P.. .01,9 9 f h Â¥ ..g .rig . i " - 1 1' --I , 11 J.,2 k; Ittl> 0~141 .99 . 03 .. ' .N 0 .:2 - . .Cy , .,1 M 3 m .8/9-2.g - - Tâ„¢m .8/9-2,0 --- -,1 % - 31! .. A-C* ..... : h *-,1 ..1 A Â·$10Â·,0 i - 0. izE=EE=:331.ZE=Il:'ll/==z-zi -===1: 0,0 2.1 -rle wi Mir. d '' i' 0- 11: 11; W : Ede" - b < , 0 . LU 4 8,1 m ..10... . M . 5 . X 2 , 1, Â·Â·4 kg 4 Z 22 i.- .......... ------------- ----- 1 ...IS .Â¥-,6 .1, 34 Hk I #Tg H " M b#-i Â· 4 ,: ./ ------6-- - 'IN * --.--- 17--, - R Â®i & iÂ·ea hia., -*-1 Mefm~ . ........0 . V. I 1: : . â„¢m ./e-z.0 ' 1 -22'~~Â°h I -' H , 9 - - .E-,1 .:::...El... ----Â·-- ' --- - Â· . Mill m le-,Z .9 E .... .... â€ž=.......â€žâ€žâ€žâ€žâ€žâ€žâ€žâ€ž=:==â€žâ€žI Dill 1- 1-m--- Mi !11. 11 : 0I $ 1 . 9 4- 9 JL . -'' 11-1 9 r . r ...1/ n 0 4,9 . 1' 99 I - .0 1 I. - 3 0 - r 6 .............------ ......+T----- V I / "11 R ' - R . d 3.' . 9 .U BIZ:: I W. 5 .. m 9/4-2 - Omo . ...'lillil: . I I ...:. I .... W~lujb mi.al ./. .9-1. 11! in aol<[ W 28!11 m 111 01 01_ \(.9 300.lul ~Â§t *.: 4 2 011 V ' /--. /4j9-/ O :4 1U O &3 ... 0 240 R Y 0 F O te 0 0 : m 1-- W 9 81 13 11. 1-01 1 - &7:+ rE u 91 1 /1. 42 u 220[ 111 0 4 I J*Wzz 2% 1 9 4342 0 2: 7 0 10 Y 4 m 2 > 0 1 1 , , 1--lu . NagwAN LOOZ' ...... ..... .... Ag Nm,ha 314VN 133HS GONI-ll3O , 91-I,m CEHWINI:1 NO!2131NI 'inc)- iva angel ..1 A.1 .9-1 49-Y MO=O' A-...1 1111111 12'-0Â» 111111111 1111111 210!331!41 114 -11Â¥mlata â€ž8/9 39 1 NOI.1.VWWO=INI 939Â¥HO BOY-IdENE =IO 91 HOÂ¥3 17 aE19oaI -3 5'-0. " 2-0. ,Â·-4â€¢ I'-4. 2-10 17Â¥mihia i,9/9 39 001-,C .... ..L-ly ..101... 1 . 1. ....el ./. Della Terra untain Chateau di x :g., 7,Â¥m B 3501 Fall River Road, Estes Park, CO 80511 .MatiP 2.-7 2-8. 4'.. 4'/ I 64 -0/ -6 $01 800179 ...+ I.* 2Â£96-96* 3Â¢V=1 11; 11, .iii! 99/0/0'Pm/Y~RA)91!mill;El 6Â£99-â‚¬6* (026) Z &909 OCIV23O-103 '>IBVd S31S3 41 2Â§ 10!1|1*!lili 3]71 320-0 'ONI '930IOH WOiSAO 2 ESC)8 00 'SNI11OO'13 OVOB BaAIN 11Â¥d 109â‚¬ 41 4 2194Â® 81ZWZ X08 -0-d 011 'Vhlbl31 V-1130 I~ ~I . i.li!,MO El ' [ILLV-ULi n J'i i i ~ri- [1 95- I-1 -TU=Firl AMINROO 11!H 1SV=I>IVE]28 9 038 ,4 91Â§4 1 |:i g 6 9 8301 InG nV31VHO NIÂ¥1NnOIN Vhlhl31 Â¥1130 m wmillillilli 8 22 2- 2 d) '9Â§#95(48*, 3.81 -1 6 9 2 .O-,C* .....E .0-,9 ~ .0..ZE 10 ...4 ~ .0-.9 .0-g .O...1 .O-5 - .eng 1 .â€ža .O.e .O-.M 0 . . Â· 2 0 .O-IL .C>-L - I .1 , 1 f.--1 . .OLL .OIL 111 1- k -1-1 4 - ~ ~it ; 5 Zd) 1 1 -14 r Bil molag 01 N3c=IO U h .T - 111 Ul (32Â¥ad )10119 St >,=aa aa.O :00Â¥ ANO31Â¥9 ; 1.11 y, 4 Q. 5 8 111-1 -4 : 7 4 0 -1 1 Itt ' 11 Â·Â· Of a - 1 Id -Il-.9 ~ 9 - 011 z. 4MIl!11 4 ~-Â·i=i ~ Joi . -2.9 (3003 83,0 11 , 4 Holjol M-:a r -, r ' 1 - " B i. 1 J. 1 1 1 lo ft ~ ' E 3,2 10 1 h Lu ,r, O ~ :. 7 b 1 / a./7 1 .4 . #VES JO -8 111 O E - ) 19* ~ Pc~x,- x- Nd :\ , Â£ (361'18 9 4- t ' EME#F=-1 . ._--~ ->u*~pcogÂ·-14&~______-__-__~-4__~ Z >10119; in 0 1 111 1 i:44.1 - L /.04 1 11 1 H . . . |I ', 4 : r \1 7-Z,m .9 ,- am -iiAâ€¢â€¢h#*: R., .. 11'C======113 K/- 1 R , ....1 , 1, h h 3 2 . - 21 9 i 11 4 e 158 'F=:4 2-uj .4 1 z'11 =454 ...1- ~ ;27.14- -. 9 * 1 4 ~ r .0-,9 .0-.4 e i 1 011 i.~ 1//A ., n \VI y 1 0%4~. .1. i ) . - 2141 1 1/ 1 - .*43Â« rn 4 h -1 r f ~.%,, 3 1 -Â· *Le-* 4 .419-,al 4 L ~ 'Â· ~ | caL~/*--~L[p 9 ;_1 ...,4 1 f /0 1 '3<211 1 Nk MII tOild .01 '~ MOild .al 1 2, 6 .--p: I - --k 4: , edâ€ž-W 1 4 2 M. - ~ I -WA....... 1 1 L i. 1 0 ..1 k -9 -â€¢ =1-09. I .0 13, rk'4_ d 0 , = h ' Al --7-- L IL -9 || 'A'. m , r--1 -1-7 .. 1- 1 11~77~1 1 ' 'MOild .9 & 0 ' , MOild .9 < 0 1 1 Al rl Ji' ||W i J-Z : 0 ,- ' 114y-11 1 {I , 1 M '211 '4 M Z# 3 z .p-:,r_ 1 -91... E .1 n .------- 1- r â‚¬13 Â»- L , ' 9 . i --12* - -1- --- -- ---FE-Â»f 4 Lv 0 4 Â»'NE-_- --~t-.!t-------- 1.4~-1 2 10% i : 1 S Â· .CPI.t 1 9 -, 28 1 'W .7 .91" . A. 1 1 . -. 1 11\ - .2.6 1 4 1 x 1 7 2.,43 â€¢6012 -c..Wex Â·- 4 ' IZ r : w:511 \Up> 4 - I -1- rb f 1,1 ~412 .. , 17 1,/ 1 1 a \ \ d) $ 0 .ti.tl .O%.6,:/, Â·C~ , , ' ' /9 i' 66 , i â‚¬ ,/wl 4 2 1 1 1 15 - 1 . . 51% f -1 - 1-Â·1~11 1 i '11 i -d/43=sm@= .11 , *24â€¢ EE & e . C..pr .2-- r .1--' M.. k ' rk - l w ..1 . .... V Â¥ - - 0 3 --- 1 - - - .1 11(==~~ U- 32!1 , d tfU X lEg X m,â‚¬ 1 W .0... -X W '- '' Qi UN' 8 3 5 0-7 1-19 .OÂ·.It 0 - 1 1 - Ill 1 8 0 It y-3 h 11 - -91 11 4 It ,1 1 . | 9 . I. \ I : M t oC - I . 4 . *--11 ' 9' N\. --11 1 3 ' 1, 10 / p/6 32 2 1 -112 1 fC 3Â·Lls''~444~,~,,,i %~.11Â·,,,,4~ 44%4L4'%%%- A L ... 11, .1,1, 1 w... -.if - lit 1 I 7- , 41-r ., -- - . L 1 W #11 1 hulâ‚¬f .O-1 .Onâ‚¬ .07 Â«EE-f : :- *i .141.62 i T . 45/,#,b . t Â· Â·Â·Â·1Â·1Â·q - 6 Uwâ€ž-1:.5 E i I i "it " b A .01Â¥t ..0-1 .0 11 3... 47 - Iteâ‚¬ L - i *im .9-,L ~P-,t' .O-. .,-., 1.-2 Â·c-.471.', 5 1-1 .,4 1 f .9-,El b. 1 11 - 94 9 Tâ„¢m , 1 & Ai 0 1 1 /53\ T Trv. -.'... I Twm,e ==11 i-~=={ .*-* kil Â·441 % A.# r#~-.ult~~~Z . . d) â€¢6' 3 I T ... ./ . - .0/9 9 0 - -01 7 * . 01/// 3 0 Q- 0 +D L LU 06+<945' ~ Er I.'CW . 0- itt-1 9 m ~15 / th' 11,411 -â€ž 1- 1,1 6 - 132 39 1 9/~Ar-th '21:k -11 r-:.4-+ 4 3 1 - 1-- 11 eli 110' 6 111 11 1 11/ \ - ' 31 -AU) /' Â·1 - . cwn,-:.0 I _ M 1 --- 12 1 0 ' - /2%;30< 1 , 3 0 Â· 9 L , 1 3,Â«7--- 1 8 MUI d 1171 â‚¬ Umo b 11Â¥m.â‚¬ 1 1 1. ~=1 . 9 ~ V A ..., I.:f. 3 Z- - 0 111 1- -., i e Ill I ~ ,_ 9 5 -g.- l- 111 z 0-0 ; Tâ„¢m ,6 1 2 1 1 Hai 1 + 1 .0-g 1 '\ 464.!i 1, :/ ~ ' ~ '~ Jul 4 Â¥ - 0 0= Z 1 4 40 .O 3 .3,9 . ..,91 .â€ž,11 1 0 1 0 9%10< ..â‚¬l 4. .0..0! 7 .0-1. .0..c~ Â· .9-,El 2 32IT Q) 0- IL 0 L . 0,9 -1 404 W 1 , Â¥00-18 hladdn NOLLYWNO=INI eltil Â£002 'ON Aequ,0 deg 3WVN 13aHG 'llvm,Laia blaGWnN 123HS 77Â¥mi 19 Nm Ag am>loaHO 991411130 , C HWNH &10!&1 1NI -11Â¥ -3.LON 9 01 ggill 1 Della Terr untain Chateau *' WALLS 12 STICK S'-O" 2'-0~ .2'-1" 2'-5" 11 il :31%09 GUARDRAIL (TYPICAL) 911 ~ M 5'-4' . 6'414" OiI*-' D' WALL â€ž41â‚¬-9 ' .5101-,/ 3' ;ALL f E MOVE 14 aalâ‚¬od 2Â£96-96*:XV=1 22908 00 'SNI110313 OVOhl 113/UB 11Â¥=1 t09Â£ ZZ @[m;lmIW!NliilmlIEOEI@* 6Â£99-â‚¬6+ (026) 8909 OGYMO1OO '>IMVd SalS3 /1 - m 2[i 11 -O~'~OH BWOOi~no 011 'Vhlkl31 V1130 P - AbliNnOO 11IH 1SV=I>lvahle 9 038 f 5 15< mELEr 1 Q ilial:.milligi z 8:3 bl3alln8 nV31VHO NIV1NnOW Vhlhl31 V1130 ht,dilkHIilil!11 1 5 1 1 1 2 3 CO # J -1.Â·f-~;--'iÂ· FEEE:~T~E , /Fli#> ! r. 0% 1.:1-0â€¢ Holld .ot H311Â©1.01 ; 555/:44Zil'. i-Lit.â‚¬4112Â·3 - 1':4:*t 1 1 J ...2.J-{C.-1.-Ny,1/9 1% imtÂ·Â©.iiI munk=lt , 13 irl -lip.41?9%1. 29 E=Y- 3 HOLId ~Oi ~ < Holld ~ol ~ :14+ LDÂ«. 1 Il /| .' . ~=JubpÂ·'~-LÂ·4 ; '31 'L :lojek- 2252.1 Jillt!1 0~ ...7 , .-413:NO,-7.2 )141. 1/-1.1.4-1.-1 , 11 i ~ ~. -- i- i--I~+~j- i. 1 :f-' 2.- 6'Â® 3~'. Â·'Â·..21.. .3443ZL122#lt - i: A -Â·49: lEi Â·Â·.1 4Â·* * 1*Ah;1 F~zL4 --r ,-1 Frri . ._~ . ~*thu 1 - / t u-ye:*Â· i ArRERâ‚¬- ... V . 1 i Â»-3*h 36.-- 11 -16 , -1 , \\0 \\ ,- 4 --\ \IM \17 7/*. 1 , n i *: i : UtoM t 1--~ ]E~ Â° oâ„¢4. Nd: Y 1-' 0- -1 i n \31 0 In '0 0 0- ~ 'M#*84 : Z 00 ie?41 i.: , 1â‚¬ -------"\ //// 1- Â· 4=== 44119 10 Â· %69 4 2 4 u ,#5 'h f'I~h'j VL--. _.L ft Z x= Â«\\\ i~ 1 /.u tri h...V I-,I â€¢-04!1- 6+1Â·~1,4-I~9.Ai,li,Â· unl 10 01 / 1 - - 1011â€¢1 .9 0 . 1 ...4Â¢41/' mad ~ ( f- -; ~ -~- 2- 1 r-. 0 1- I 71 14 4 - 631 - 4- 0 aL , trfor.. \NA- 3 -9 i: g Q) J. A A i .:Ei 1 M: , ~ p~3 --- 9 3 1-i[ 6 .. , â€¢ 'al I L LU OT-u 1,1 ten.111 rat.0 /-/ I ,@h'ririp reti d) 3 1 - 1 tihu N/itt:-*0 -_ ID b-il t .,. .,19*~1#IMN!- - ' ir 11 1 \. 11 1 Â·Â· - 1--1 ; ---** *---' I ~ @ --1 16::-3* *U. . 1 1 1 ,oilci.a i Â», - -r F' t<rrl ' - , - c , L~ L.! -' 6# / I t.%-Clk i ' U..in.ji~ i / lt. l.t#,i i U- CDLI t kt Holld.ot Holld .01 ~ ri I T ' 17 .1 7 0 4, L 117 M - â‚¬0 V 1 m u t FL i ' - = 9 1*1 1Dh'fiYRit , L L Ai --. 11 , 2\ 01 3 4 4 ...Bl L 1 ... \./ Â· . frÂ·Â¥.4fk 4-2 y A 1 at i 11 1 1L 1 i b 0 1 I. 1 10 1 1 - Holld.01 - 1. 'Â·.~63@1/2/&,aki FR - 44*4 . 13-4.0@ . 1 9-i -/1. ail(f . I Pib 0-ty03-ou - Â»%4-96- 4 fÂ·:Â· 41Â·Â·,1Â·Â·Â· Â·61Uffi - tolld .21 - - Molld .21 \ L .... 1 i *hurze Wall IEEE] 1 1 11 1 1 I'.U -- 3*t?*AM#rbâ€¢ 4' A L - -5 - - - 5 -D- -- \3tlt-1-fli-rLI trtl --4 i.- i l-' ~ -'ci,I -f-- x. ln.el,14rl,~,Mlk-r -- i _'_-~~F ~J y~t~' -- - ~-4- %44%19,%' fat---1 --- - - 2,4 -7-X-- - Â¥Triil-trrirlnf_ , . agwnN gor alva 3 AG aa>Isa D blE nN 123/9 i.Â·5.* 4 1Â·19 IL .- -- Holl.1 â€žEl f Della T untain Chateau (1Â¥3 BAOUY 030,[ah,333ht 97 913NÂ¥cl blÂ¥109 mE IA NOON = â€žel EllvO9 HO.lal.ZI Hollct ./1 ; 2Â£96-96* :XÂ¥3 MmERWImil,0 51!lmingil 6Â£99-â‚¬6* (026) Z L909 OC]VBO-103 ')INVd S31S3 m liNFI -0141 'S3AOH Wolsno Â° < 2908 03 'SNI11OO 13 aVON blaAIM 11Â¥3 LOSE :11 ii Wii'al'i. 91Â·ZILE X09 0 d 011 'VMEL Â¥1130 h Ill iliiilililii! CD a"ILEÂ®UU]Â®]Ul Ak!1Nn00 -11IH 1SV:I>IÂ¥3&8 9 038 6 RE 8 iii &*ilitii m i i Z 3 Â¥3alln8 AV31VHO NIÂ¥1NnOIN Vhlhl31 V113a Lhq/?11:211.1!..& 8& 20 .C>,ZI 119 )A .0-I ... 0-I 01 .01 .eli .0... .los .O-,M .O/ . 2 P,/ ./. .0-Â¥ ./.L .0-1 .CIL /01 5 2 I I ZE g mO-139.01 NEc=le Zg ew Nolls 91 INOO1,9 ~ 6 I ./1/ .CO.t 3120 900/I 1 Ze , 3029 g=ZE===ZIZZ=ZI.*F=-=IZE===:====~1 i TT,m./ ., 1 7... : :~:,0&-2.6 M 11 ::.la/G-'16 : 1, 1, 1. liMMâ€žwdol-. 3 .â€ž 99 3 H TEEid-,21'~ H HOLId .01 4 ..... '' 11 1, Â·Â· 2~iNJ Z ~ . i i _____ ___?91.Â¤/3.3 -132,= 2.1 = 99 â‚¬ 1 2=11 9 :1 wÂ·83/ 30 1 i ga A â‚¬g 1 :-: - -- ..... M -41 BO , .,1 'MIle -9 1 4 L- -- -- M[ -- -- -- -- -- -- ed â‚¬g 1 -n- â‚¬=1 I - -Lit -- -- -- -- - --1 17 0 : 1 d â‚¬g 1 ...1 Ed . ... .01 A i -17Â¢m .g E 3538 3, M L 1 1, - 11 i â€¢ 11' a. '9. ' I 11 1 1 kEl . . 1 , -- - - Illa *,1 lEo , te 0 0 1 =I Z , m com m: *9 2. f ? 3 Â£ A 1 0- 112 1 0- - ,n & r J L 1 4 4 4 8 3 1. 33 3 11 1 a. 4 - X r A A A al el - .1 . 8 4 - Â·Â· 1 4 . .4 4 -3 -_3 i~ 3 -~ I ---- -- 9 1 0 , ' 0 -TTÂ¢m 9 ./. 1 k 01 NIÂ¥*Nnod ' ' Ill 0.9 7 rig - L lak 3 1 Â· I r : / 42 . I .0-/. el g .., A . 1 2 - .CR .3. T.m, i 3: d 1 Or.L 1 1. . I Moild lot EC d Le , Ed -, 3 . - Zg :.91â‚¬2 ...C & I - 4 ' b â‚¬ :1 E 1 - 4 Ea .94111.9 . 2 Ill-, / 19 . . 1 1 .OÂ·/ O. lid., ; Ea .4 1 : . 8 H 4.~ 0 8 ./..4/i- /1 - 0 , 11/.9 . E - 0 77Ym.9 - d I , 010 : gil , 1 1 ill - 1 0 1 0 1 1 19 6 6- - - -- f -- -- 4. 1 - , -:0- 0- 1 =9 -- co .3 - 0 1 '14 1 1 1 4 1 1 7 1 - -11 19 - 1-:=2 6 1 4 1 1 1 *1 1 lia ./ 1113 .M ET 7Â» 2 k a . J. Â§631 ; ~ â€¢ I 11 b 11 Â£ 17/m.9 11. , L 1=1 .01 17Â¢m,9 : 1 U! i * 4 9=1 S : , r - 7 0 11 f f 0- 00 0 - 01 9 1 .0 92 1 - 1 -H ir L<mlâ€ž *- - -- 3T- .- 1 - -- I --f ... --- ---- =mi == 0,- 1 Y39 30 - 11 11 2 11 1. Â· .101 .9/9-2 10 I : 3 Â· if " d01 0/9-Z ,9 0 J .1 11 1.3 il, Â©:=:2?35=222Fzet=z:*7--U : 2-ix===hk====utt:=i:=-=:-==>-==:191 1 WV39 dO cl01 I IÂ·1*,9 Â£1 .0. .... Pk Pl . . .04- .O-I ..... .<> ' 1 * 11. â€žC>-,,1 /O-,M . I .CU .01 ' â€žO-,Â¥t Â£ 53= cM?El G --- 1 .e./ .9- ./.-,â‚¬1 .4.18 . ..5 Ok ..1â‚¬1 r----- -- ------------------ 1 1-â„¢m.g Trrm,0 gla ig i-- ta-. -- -- -- - I {1-1 - I :0_ m e r - b 2 9 0 5 Trpâ€¢m g -- 177fn .â‚¬ 1 -I--- ----- ------l l 9 . ... 11 0 1 1 - â‚¬0 4) U- 1 0 Q) <D L 11~ L I. . 1 4 11 4 1 - , A A 4 0 Â¥ In I - 3 2 -9-1 .4.1/ .... .... .O,Ok .0-01 .... 1 r * 4 hl3AOAÂ¥1 SSnhll aiagwnN ger 1 >10:ia 3WVN 133MS &139WnN 133MS Ag 03>1O3MY) 11,m - - .'.10#. 4.-0/ 5.-O. ./OÂ» O hol g I .1 .... .0-1/ MC"'.1 .0-1. .0- r .51.. .4101... .0.. . .1.-,2 .O-,2 .0-,6 .0-15 Della Terr untain Chateau .~111 â‚¬ WALL6 1 2><12 STICK , 0' PIC' DIVE.1 1,1 .TICK -AMI/ /0- *TCK ~Â·~M~D ~C)O- I. S. .ool. . -2:tra ...lot I lilli .. .1,- 2Â·/ 2.0" e'.0Â· 2'4Â· 2 1 1.Â· 20" 4' u' ~ ~ ..1. ,â€žIL ----- -- 8' 2-5/ WALL inolv-1 genhli =loow blactan "9.1.1.0 A3/AI ' . -U,- p. 6 WALL 0..TC 5 -4. 2'-O. 2'-0" 4'-104 02-1 119-1. .It Leet,4 - t... 71 m .9 62 11Â¥/ IP,11-- SI233-MMW :# 900 ~*OaFOJd 838- sawoH FiJ*Unol 1 I tH :lepow :SSejppEI Jelol u! 11!3 :.1eu6!sa~ Je*Ol U! 11!3 :Jepling -= ter, 0 1 1 W il 11 1 Oe 8% 1 888 2 0 U. < . .I CO m 0.. 1 -- -- 11\ En. a.,D --hi 'r li 1 1 1 1 [Il 1 / 1 9 11 iw E IM - 1 d I 1 4 & 11 1 11 w 9 011 t -~ t! - Ib Ew 11 7 - mil L 4 01 N lo m i W IJ44*IE 21-9 S 11111111 11 1 - 1 9 :z 00 1: M . i Fr-irM 5 HddiE a. 8 ET LE]333 0 J 00 O - i Lf) al mi 1 O ' W El :11 O 1 Ib EU 0 1, 1 dll I LO 9 - |-L. W m / 4 . 1-~.hZ 21.6. Â·Â·Â· 8 298 hi ! 98 98 8 1 -9.84 - 6.11 8 3 3 g S | th~ 0 / 4 9 29 .9 ED 9 0 11 8 11 i . 98 -8.* --- -- IT- ---- -98 __ 1 1 1--2-1 Il -1 1 1Â·---.9.El----1-~ .OT-tlÂ·--1 111--~27-11 1 1 o I E 11 1 :\ i /: \ \ 1 // e \ 1 / . / 1 / / / \1/ \1/ 1 \ /I \ / 1 \ \ \ / 1 I (11 . W CI LD 1--- 0 Â¢ 11 1 \ / 1 \ / 1 \ 1 1 :ON 80P T233-MMW :ON 398d ~7 T 30 T --15'11-8 -16' -5' --4--1,Â·--9' -5' -4--~16' -9'6"-12' --- RAFTERS OTHER B)HIO AG Ski .8 / 22]H.10 AA S8313Wki I-.21- .9.6- .ST-.0.-1.J-1.-~. .Sh ..OT.TT.- I .A l A 1PB 1 I39 1 1BM 81, I ~ ' TW88TW R TERS 8 THER RAFTERS BY O~ RAFTERS BY OT EA 2â‚¬86-96* :)al=1 14 / '13 1 11.1 @Men"!*J* 6Â£99-â‚¬64 (026) Z #908 00Â¥30-100 '>INVd SalSB m *1_1 il 3Nt 'SBINOH WO]-SnO %9 i ~ E a 2908 03 'SNI11O3'13 OVORI 213AIN TTV:1 109Â£ Â¤ 91ZLZE X09 '0-d 011 'VUB31 V-113a .t < * 1~- Z g ~1Â®[E]*t[Elii AbLLNnOO 11!H isv:I>lvahle 9 038 ill li iillitillill! ? 6 j iIi illimillitililii @m W 2 5 X hl301In8 nV31VHO NIV1NnOIN Vklk:lal V-1130 R 10 Â¥ 112 ,011?1(8!:,11! liti/ 000 922 # # .. Itt J 0 (D 1 4Â«1.2 t - {-4 1-,-Li, 11, 'It : 1 : 1-1 - 1-1 i. 1-7 14.- h.jed I I-' '-,1 f; 4 6' I. ' I. 1 .' :1 I + i :2 '1044' 7*.i-,-8-!Â·-11 '-I~~.t]-11-1- ~~itÂ« '1 f' 0 Â· 141- IllÂ·~Â·u74'".'-~itf3 1,11:'i'E:-~-tp.1 311.4 1,1 :1 - 19 ~,~ 1 .1 1, , 4 1 1 1 .1 J 111 '111 1 - q -,a N .._,Â·Â· i, '~'Et---- - 4141 ' -~Â») . - H ' 7 r ' L j-ul~ 2-.-r' i:'i': r, 1-1 1 1 101,Z.. 1 0.. ~~ k-t-b 5-'9 l + A v :41-J.-,ER ', L -'.1' 221' -rial-1 1 1- 2 - 1,11 Â·1478:rdjkt -1,-ITE; '~ '3,- #48:--i | A 1 1 1 '/1, y - . 1- . t 1hw ; r + 61111 114. I : 11 Â· 14. me /.1-~~411ii-Â®3_j u VI IL~Pitâ‚¬Â·Â·M-kill 4,~,p~ ,'' - -. , L~| ~| N . 341{ :,U-r-1~.'~ 1-1 1:1 1-! :1 11-~ 1.- i,~;'-Â·7 ,-~ i 1-!-,1-1 7--t431-M-RnI]iTT- NU}--1, in_- i' r Irl- i AL-DI.444 %4-r. - Â· A'Â· rl,-T Il t'*UJU 1_liw .' Â·Â·11= ba' lut : 73Ii - /11.--1. 11.1.1,11 - 1 1 1. I.1 :. -1 9 t,i-4 fE-! *A 4,1 liT' IW' r.i - i Â· ' Â· -Â·' f.-- ' i.f ~ .t/411 ~ IM n.'1 U - 4 /'.1 1 ., .-11 > 1 1 . 6. r â€¢ r' ./ 1.4 +1 1-1 1. 1 t - L-1.77 1- .Â·'I.11'IJ.m.i'.P .1,4-HI/,4-= . 11 - 1 L ,fl 1-1- _ 1 r'-u , , ER-4*ft *If-] :-f.-C-~1}4-[~] -f--1-2-1 4:.61 1 lII -fal-ttivt~!-1 r-~ .~ < u- 4 LJ .ll}4Â·!.i~-~ Ht Z/Â· ..~..,/ 9. jift-ti L#+41Â·~:t~ .. 1 lÂ· L. !.,1. ! 4.-i~ 1 = Et F<Of- t, Il-; t- -' I--;'; ~ F~~ -~~ ~-~ -~ ~, - ~ ~-~ ~-~~*~~ ~ ~~ *~*tiftâ‚¬ka=l,Ytltpe?-ljiltÂ·w 0, LU -4 . / lid M-V -%21# - Â· 3:-/ lim F ..,-i,-, , - Â·'/ . ,-Â· Â·- -l:'. 4*i~17 3-,7.t-t 1â€ž~F*IJ IImmI - , : 147 ., J// 1-'/-141 4,-_.. i.i +L4- â‚¬0 10- - 1.- ;tly' . ~' f 'a-97 -N-t~'>'7.Â» ~ .45 1,413<OY# h fliTÂ£1 1EJ~ H inzu--~ i~ I 10 11 i: 1--0 / r 4 1 + 7 . C-%3 ~ i r:. ./..., 11- b.:' Py :... 1.1 1 Â·Pul -- ,al Â·4 FL* 1 ,Â«-7 78 #A ' / al 114 o E In -- 11 - ~11.- Uh 1.- P b= 4 - 7 . ~ir#:7-4- . i . : Â· ..4 TY.TA 'r, ~ -{bÂ·h+-*; -Eq-fr-%, U.*i Â· 'mi-1 i â‚¬>i f . 1/1 I 1 Â·t '_.21_&. 1 ,â€¢ Ly -1-/!I, 1 9, ' i |.Â©1 7:.2. - f-1- -i-~ Ffp#fr;-if.11 Maccu FRE frmil:'t .g M 09-0 , 11&\ 11 Â»i 4firi, L . nhn<H an . JI P t- 1 il Al.,11 i F 041-1-1. A, Ch-,L-Ih .<fli: 2~i r-Â·La 1.11 - Â®4 14 l.h-,1 1Jt . 9â€¢. )1~ FLL_ u.Â· 1--I.-'...~~.'. N:-,-_ -t i}i. i,til-{1 ~ - , ~ : j~L.m~ , 1 11-*rl-ff-<0~.~, 74/li 2/-1:'PJ):1 i 'râ€¢ ' ., ..~ . 11 ,-f eltÂ·ylt ';-: '1Â·t' li n :Â· CIt .-trtc I -Ha .1 . '47..4. , 1 ~.7-4- it':4 -. rr-LLL_1-1 ~ ' Pr. ;?10-1 ,.itl dli.ion, (-bjh Ul i-4- >.r'r--rith--;-Prl F- 3 ; Jil: Ui'_j blF.:~:T.: : Jl 1 i ' ' -1 - , A 'r.-la.0 , K 9:--i''Il:-11-1~iL->777 .*, .~.~~; ~= ,2= 11-1- 1-,j- .t...1.11~1 11.-:.441-~ Lij. i~ -: ~ p . irdil - -i 'in 0 4 'll :,ill -, ,- 1/ . . 1-4'iti ~. 61Zz: : 'd'J fÂ·~ '-l FTÂ·Ii,"I:: ,:4~1: ;:-I:-r i~-1-1 1,#-1Â£-Â· It '91-8,4]1~f~[-11 ' 'Â·'kh a'2!~~'.->:r~~:_-I_ Ii' ' ~_'.i,Â·!._-;:-,f'~..F ~4*ilÂ·/C[tlu t=jMPM Ji.Lt #-1 H.ji it; t!/ 4 'F, 1. 1 1 .. ~ ~, - ~ Â·Â·~ I'l~B ridl:-11:lft 17~';' IL,;~ --,-Ii :,1'q --#-;,r--,--i,;:L,1r,P ,r-:..r; r=iali'.1 1461-1 !1, Pif enbull f?14RkFtf~f~fl~ - -0-0 01>: 1 1 6\-27 Iii 1 - - . 1 1 7, -- Â·- hoom 't..., 1 ,~; . ' f;ttrl!-:r ...i '~'4111: L'--14-NFL ..~ 3.~ ,-- -Â· ' JNhopii >r 41, -.1,~' ,-c|@-~;'-| ' - #2831*i , - ,\1== 51 :4'tAl-ki. 1 "j ,... 1 1[~~ri~.11: ..11#u<liblifftrl-#64-:yi -'2 "9111%3'Nol;Ht\Â»**~F.:.: -W.,2,171:il;f '7~FriJ Wh---41-1- 1--' U-~-"1"ll, -,Â·. - - IH 'Al . 'I â€¢I' HI, 1.. Piblin '''i-Â· iMM f - "143'& 4tlf-'H'i-t, ,-1 '-1,Â·, jiL 'p.- 15.-,L,,:-l-~13.1~ 0.11,111.1.,j'-1 44:1'5.-:-KNE-t -Â·Â·Â· - Â· -Â· I I.'I .'t rd Â·'i,-le:filritl.h-F %60-h#%2 I --19~ . -5 -rbl'ld 1 4:. -1- -(,-JÂ·~ fead - :-'1~' - Â£:'1-' r bli-Ill M.P 1.,1:. I )41 r MA' MM ;':.9 f- 1 ''-H-U~ - '' '-' â€¢1 rl !Â· r. r''t_Â·LS: - 4 1-17 1 11 21 + L. ._. -1 n M M :-,11 b i &11 1 .1 31 I E . -. li 4 iii 52 - M F :! W1 A Kil ki ii *1 .er. 61 .2 ! .4 1 .le-,91 f ..r.6 1 1 ....01 f f Â·'" , 7 N ./â€ž 1 .. .61 11 1 1 , f . i . 9,9 f .*Â·5Â°f' "Wia .44 ...â‚¬ 01 *Oll- ~01 I j f ....5 2 1 u. 1 1 8 1 4 1 wa-,6â‚¬ ta M 0.--" 11; 93 mi a 1 N. 4 1 3' 4 1 41 4 4 1.4 : :i 91 - 0 + . , SN01VA alld E .l i E l _ 11 1191/â‚¬ I.LVA313 Della Terra Chateau 3501 Fall River CO 80511 â€¢/L for main 10"/B" pItch Nor) of upp,r 111.11. ~E_or -Of - . _ PAt:- - -*mi p 2Â£86-864 XV=1 6Â£99-â‚¬6*(026) 89080(]40103 '>IMVd S31S3 Iii ,! 1,11 did 26909 03 'SN!1103'13 C]VOH 83/yll 11Â¥ 3 l09â‚¬ m co 377 1%11[11~11 ONI 'SBAOH WOISnO Â¢"111!11 im & BLZKZZ X08 -0-d 011 'Vhlkel V-1130 * w W Â£ IllÂ¢Fil f i i pi i 11~[[U]~LUE[DiliI] ' Abl-LNROO 11IH 1SV=DIVE]BEI 9 038 4 6 == 9 b!30-ling nV31VHO NIV1NnOW Â¥BkI31 V1130 0 .9 , 2= m 08 0 9, ' .0 1 i m 1! 1 4 11 1 4 lit ... r - I 21,-IIi,/1 IP 111, - 1,ill, , , 0 47 i,Jl ger: ;,'1 4,3 lili -1(Â«t = Â· I 1 i .... 11 },11,-rlili ,Â£91 11111111 1 1 1,0,9, .,7. I ~11~~, 1 2"L i~'I/'Â»~h*ir~nrte â‚¬ Ilmm i 4,- - 1 :~, liftitifti~0%94 3 GE - *#M 4 lk/4 cryjil W 0 . 411 '7:.-: i .l - - 4 tr.ri) AIM M ItT-'77- Â·4.01, I '.146Â· Nft#99 p 11:It- I n i r . ~~- I ry #~~~~i--- - ~~ ~~~~~~ h \44.2 '11 - 4 9434142 -- ...r--1---A- I ] 1 Â»,1,4 Le .f ' 221 ~..Aull=}181**aAfiN N f )~r~2 -~':imP#J *12 Zml i - .' Atso.19:tdlitti: ) *41 1 11.-r ri ~611~J.S.Fl~rf ~11 2. 1 -1 1 i ' t~}'i~~t}lfij]WA Litfr[I,rt 1 1 31 , i - - 2.. . Â· =trr7-7 i â€¢- L , U: Ir,1 - F leate-* Il ~ 43 ' +4 I .Â·. .. Â· I.:.. 'i. I- 1RFU 4 -. -*0(C ~ 11-4-W#NIti -- ,Â· -i %124- 2 i. 8 32 _ W~ 1:,Â·- 2.,t 3"" j Â¥ - -.. 1.,1 LINI~El 4-44 ..Ant--=-1111'11-1\3 - .igEs.v .u-- - .,PA~O-Fl~Â£ m- 1 Mit - r 1 41-)-19'i"'f 11*H r- 11411 149 9% 1051 '1 19 ]IMIC LIEN r 1 ~ | ~ ~1"/-'lIik5ililtz:~A ~f~ijitt'F~TiM'MI,; u ' ' 1 d L Â·â€žI~ k, ,>0'/01-' 7. 1291---- : - 1 TvÂ» .4 2. r~SYL#1718*44 /, i ilil 1 1 - 7, / 7 mt-rzfâ„¢It=1 , / Al & UN U win Â· .J rr, 1 1It4141*t~!;Â·ME ' Â·Â·y>Zirm,i~5*66~ *34*Di- . / Al d 1 1/VI i I . Â«2~11~1Â»W R-114-911-1 t. M.ce u.,.Â·â€¢164 =,41-Â·..Il . .,c N*IF d 4!I.94*rt);Ft {0 4 1- 1- 4 - Jk-.-ALV..=Â»:. 9/.-: 491 , _ijf:,1 -~1 rl-Â·0./ifil--DIIQI1 - . 4,<.1 -,lr I .1*fl 41 : 1.. I .r .1-1 -4 4- - C -4 -ii .,;~21.â‚¬. 41 t ' 'IJAS,/4 ti 4 144&'k.~.31 r---'99<Ef~77 'Â· 1 1 â€¢// U 2 1-jÂ· 11 !, 2 '1~!UTIF ---- 08 047-~]RJÂ»1=414*9 --Â· ,-' b:' i " ' 1-rÂ·-AL. ~-' ~. .p--21#lÂ¥-1 ON*641:& k r , -I : 1,1 - -1. - - ' I' ': l'Plimmim lilME - r 1.1.Itl~ Om , ' 414- '-,Â· ' b :- - 6 1; Id-,01 14_ . - 14 21 1 1 191 , 1 -11 ..10 4 - . . -1[j, 14'13 1,1 <Â·tr! U -- -'1 --IF-7 ..11 '- Il irta 4". Trni. ---- ,1 , '1' I''/(4Â£/1, Â·- - ' A' tojit)./.Njtti-2 Il 1 : 35.~1 -'...1 :iÂ· Â· '-Â·. Â·ii,*rÂ·AalÂ·In-rny -- . dittrrÂ·r WI[Eari 1 11 Fie'_i -,4(4 ..th--11 Â·: ~ - Â» ter'-34,LIL -- -- .,7-4 11.1 4 i I --- - 4 Lk>t- , azER CO ,~ I ,~t*U=4 4%~LZ~T~<184252 6 + /. i AP'/5-9/4 :4+ a '_Ll_". â€¢\>7 , 6 ~w'./ ~Nâ€¢.m ./ '74** - lt-. /if -â‚¬U* - 11<411{ I --"=12 4.Â·eamâ€ž*4 149.11 m--~mj 1 1-1 -1 K h Â·il_ '11 ir I . .. V 'RiE =11 '2 -' AN/11251 .., ' I ' ..4/x> ~- . *rdi . 6-- 1; 1 , 0 1 .,e,i,/i, ..7-#11 iii- 1 - I 1 ID*-1 1|1 1 14 lili 1 147 - r :- 1[17Â·bÂ·-1.44 .4 reÂ·~1 jr 7. 1 -L 1 - 7 + 1 wn, 1 A unt 1-U~ W - 1 It ".- y : 2.Â· '7> Â·- . Fri=lito .Mtir-91-1 - : U rt' 9.14 : .117 I I. - 1. L U LL -Le~ - -1 Ir '14 1 1~~~~ :13*,rl' --1-1-n J. *1 - 1 - 11 -% 1 1 1 10-*2 9*2 -- 1- r. 1 Idminfl 1-Wl(PIPÂ¥=UM, 2049727 - 41[ 111-3.-1 6,0. Wwt#* C I |-.-rg= 4- 11...DA.. L.I Bcd]LI '~~P .LI ' .,/m -- -- V ,| ,41Â£4-11Â®1,[il.-494442,64 flh' ..Â· iI. An 1/Ely \Agza Ill D.Â®34~411 .4 ./ - :~t:~-:Â·Â·.-- -~ ~4 ~:Ll- , AP --. - Â·4 4#'1&4I h, r,m: 1 00 4 11 r =U , â€¢ 1 11~~râ€¢+04- 1.,1 11 1.. - :51..9.â€¢ .d lm'Â·Â·~t. 1 J. 1 2 . uu 1 .alt' val 7- - ~ 1%1 Â·- , C Â· F.UL 4 Zxl 181)Tr~rl:m:E Urs- ri AÂ·Â¥11 H U l ~~2t MER --Â· :â€¢- 4 ., .. ~49 , i i .1 ~,L ..1 il .. U L_._141*rw . .; 10011- . 1 -11 . 1 1. IN E +3li'Prl.h_ 17~E;m./FT-[.T,#7~ZZ.-~pLE ~ .zh- ,- i -i i ~~-LJÂ¢7 1/ L~._, ~0,1, r ,*4% U i.-'i - Â·Â· '-rill . :k i " r-' i Elli-1-#UU-fl'Ali 1. bt 1- i i 111 t./d#Â£111.-1â€¢rq Lit ~ RE-4't.hai:] 1 'BL'le.' : 01]4 / s !, UX:-1_cLL.M i. - 16. fi 1 V ij J i~ i K ! i,! ij qi Vit ...7 1 i i i ! 18 1 6 li: 11, M i -L -- .' I ----- ' ' it! .2 , /1'-' 4 4 .â€¢il 1 W. ! ! i{ .4 i 4.. : S: 14, 3 ... 2-6 11.Cri ,! .0 9 1 4 1 i T--,ia--1 ; H *. 1 ..1 4 11 1, 4 4 S I 11 i' f--11 erlf- 4,1 1 k J 1 2 1 19 13 4 + i . 4 11 / R 1% 1 , A..5 1 . SNOI1VA Della Terr n Chateau 3501 Fall River Road, Estes Park, CO 80511 NOI.LVA313 1=131 NOI-LVA312 .LH'DIht .Â£:W---7â€¢frdâ€¢ ZÂ£86-86* Xy=1 lie ! ,li 1 1!i' @Im;E@11Mlm=!ImiI*El* 6Â£99-Â£6+ (026) 21909 00Â¥80103 ')IMVd SELLS3 2909 03 'SNI11O3'13 OVOB B3AIB 1-19:1 L09Â£ qi 'i '11111.!11!j Â°3Â°F~ 1 111 -ONI 'S3W0H IN01Sn0 iii h *buliwb . til . . BEI.22 X09 'Od 011 'VBB31 V1130 : 111 0 m e fit muuÂ®=1}1Â®]11=1~!12 Ah!1NnOO 11IH -LSV=l>IVE]Be 9 a38 ZOZ i. 5 hl3olln9 nV31VHO NIV1NnOIN VhlkIELL V1130 ;pil?!~11;,ipj;!ilji Q RE 3 21 W 18& 0 41 i;13#:~illieug Z M - M :s - 8 8 $ 0 111 - 11 e 845 1-- it54 0 6 1 80 111 1 12/1 .. ff. 90 3& .... - ZZ 1 1 .%9-,L 4 2 11 - /1 4 1 mil.J: ri ;ii % il : li 'iti:. 00 ilo==== . 18 4 1 - h: i:!20Â·.WD@ -0 1...,i- ' 31 .ri -'12 51 14414.14 1- F w .. G r, 1 ,-,1.-tw. LIT- .;le . : . & 0 111 3 : 1%9 4/ '7:rt Â§ 1 210 1# 1.1-9 1 1 V - H 0-0 M n it NE e. 4/ ..2-0 .1 - CD 10; 1.8 117 2 -007 avis 11! 2 \ 4 41 2 .*Z-.01 .ZI 3:Â§ * 1 /:.iÂ·a q, iii a J O cr~z Â¢ 4.,,1-1 il - !lilli 11 11 .. - === J 1 - GL*12 1/ ~ "-0 &ll I 71Hz j 1 19 41 !Â§t h./. .Â¥ at \ .9.-,6 9- â€¢ 4 .ON : A / J =17 . n m 4 09 i 0 :,0 =r Â¢0 .4,01-,9 4- I - a Z 11 - 1 -.....1,- 73 4 1 -0 4 5/ - 01 .0 111 i .1 I -'-/ i 3 0 9 W 0 - I i='(-/Â·3: Iii 7/ : 6 0 Â·5 - L 1 4. ga nin - I L -7 L 2 Â£{1- . 0 - L W ./.1 4 b -m - 0 'ILS-,L .1 .0.E 0 ,1 Q) 1 - 7 . N ...1 O - 3 1 14 10 9 4 i 1.14 gs b m 1..} 4,1: 0 111:!5 -1-t~ M 0. 1. 110 . /EI 43 m - 5 till!:311 11Â£1111: .2 IL 0 O P r 0/ d j 9 1 Â· 0 - JÂ£ 111 1.J ... i= 111 1 : Â· Uof 2 2 1 0 0- &0 S-~ ,<- - ill i# {21 i 1,3 . 94 1 .,1â‚¬-16 ' 0 9 4 ., 1~ . . 4 5% E 43ET=~i ill r. ir z 0 >- Z 7i 4 - LL - li VM ---- -0 1 LL U. 0 . 19'1 2 a di.201 0 : 4 1,44 .,. . -- 1- <D Et 0 0 Q) 4 0[ Z . 0 3 X 0I I . . -- 111 11 / W, 14 d 0 08 /0 *ZIC--7'E EL,L_- /. - A Li ~3 I 4 %91 80 . I|!34 ~ Ti i -- - fc, dic 1 -1 091 i :- 22.1 1 1 f j i PtÂ·' i 4 WIM ' ji -m! 4~4 91 1 :' 1 "Sm :Aum 1 -4#90 94392 E ! li 'i fi al j 1 : 8,2 iii! bl A % 1 f fi t 1 1 .410.9 ...E + Diz-1 O Ul ;. li i , li i' F 1 i~ w * 9 3 m :H .%9-.L , ./-,â‚¬1 i 1,1 Y 11 16 ..9-19 aim Bm~ .9,1-,te 1 f jj i .'49-,U .01-96 3 .01-,u + .01-,2 . ' 0 SNOI1039 SS llÂ¥/INYM 9 rIN]/NOO blagw AT ON NOIIV EXT. 2*6 WALLS 51-EC 2 X I STUDI - 16 0 C GTONE/WARDC C 'AT 6Â·r JCCO 11 = 1191/â‚¬ WIGI --ILE COMI. 8WINCLE* A~ATE untain Chateau tee Park, CO 80511 .â€¢~ TOÂ¥4 â€¢Il 190/ 21...NOP .......0/01 909.19 aG U. 'AFT-6 AT .TA~AV. LIV. *TA . lv~01,... BA/97 339 C-IMO.1 1~14Â¥W NO t.t /38 1....TION 1 ~Â· , ./.IL CE]LIN/8 ........LOO,ME Â· ---- -TI 'RADIANT .OC- WEA' -MT TO IC,TCHE,4 ./- 903cle 'ONE NEd ., ,/I' CEILINc= gATED aÂ·rP'6JM~ BO;*~D ' '9O3Cle STICK FRAMED ROOF --~01 I Tor C. ..r.r-111 90.... la 104.-4..._'ll'*Il. _~ I. 1 2Â£96-96t, :XV=! 11; 1.11 1 ~lmfÂ®/5mu~0@ 6Â£99-Â£6* (026) 8909 OCIVBO1O0 ')!BVd Sal.Sa 'ONI 'SBNOH WO1SRO * ~ ~ ZZ909 03 'SNI11O3'13 aVOH hIBAIB TIVJ t09â‚¬ :; 1 i[, i 9LZLZE X09 -0-d 011 'nINELL Â¥1130 94 /0&6 !% 0 r- muf'**WI I Ah!1NROO 11IH 19Â¥=IMÂ¥3kle 19 038 , 1 8.!.3 Â·S:349,1:8 m 9 20 hl301InEI fIV31VHO NIV1NflOIN Vhlh131 V-1130 r ~~~!~~~i!lilillilil , M 12 KE3 ~7 12 . 1 . 0 . 1.2 > 1/0 Itl K91 1 29 d 111 #1 0 1- 18 -1 ' 111.--=--1 Z 0 -- ,, 0Â£ 1 11 11 (Q= '' Z Z 0 I Ill ~~ ... 39 0 124 1.- .010. : 111 0 . 30 W D : 0 8 0 : U -/ ....... -'.1 -1, 0( CD ~i~>~LAO ~CO-W al@~- /O.01 E ./../MAI~ 1,101 .U-01 1-1 21 t., , %... I CLINDEL~ - . - -Unf:J ..Il Tnâ€¢m â‚¬Â»-Â¥ge A XI * 11 e 4 . 9 1 : 1% 1 - il A * d =h- ./ b <D I 0 .8 Â¢0 5 230: 4- -1, - 5 1%8 1..... '0 Q) L lili 2 <0 3; 1 1,11 1 4 -~â€ž,1,L,IN J,~d~d Jd 1414JLPEJJâ€¢,01 ~ â€¢â€¢ ZIZZ-ZE: IZEZI 11. 1 1 - 40(. i -1 1 I 4.--:*4~11-Ut] 10 t 1 1 - ~ M 111 to -1 U . 1 1 -' â€ž99-,6 : ludzâ‚¬ 11 - D U 9, 11 z -13 0 R 0 Z W â‚¬ 42 1 2 =11 1 1 4Â·.L=m~4,:iman/7 : 111 1 Jih i 91 1& 52 Â§ 99 ~*- Im 1011 n[ ' P.,Â·rl:1%1:,Â·1Â· !'.81 !'1W~,~I;.,liu~61 ~ Ini:1!11~V,~ ~~!tr,A!1!11~t!I;P,11 9.4 \ 11 -7 - 1 5.: 2 r m i !:t" 14 %*81 u: u . / 0 W AL~~~~1 -=Â· 9.0..i.e.U <r d M b " 2 11- O 1 0 Z I l 1 52 . i %4 1, I. 0 A : .'4hol t ::. t.1. = r. Hil i ( Â· - d) 9 $ , 1/- . . U e 1 .O-,9 U ... 1 11111 1 1 E HZ U 1-OR - -4.4-11111 a.elilli. ..'.ILÂ·<-0 1 '1 ./C-9 ./ 1/ 1 11.42'11 1, d) h lilli.,2.61 . .C 11,1,1 1-41 2 --././.-- - - 1,1,11,1,1- N - 11- 111 111 M 0 4 :24 il ( 1} f-12 .. . 111 : 1. I .Â¥-16 -----~------{1.--- -t>' _ 73,Ie ,/ 7 4 9' i 1 #N =t . 1- .> . 1 \ 1.9.141 .0-.9 . i -1 1 4 &> Â· - ,- b : 11.7. > 6. .Wl-,L a > i i . ..1~Â·..'ii,Â·,Â·iÂ·i'iwiliwiriti, .' . Lmm~=Ellx La-1 . \-1 - e. 111 11-111 7 . .,1â‚¬-,6 .FL-,6 1 1 \\ !! 1 5 1 1~1 ! i 11 f' 4 ~~Mi Ae 34/.-. Ilu '-1Â»Ill alagwnN gor aivc anggl . 01 1.4 3WMN 133HS -A313 1=IE!1 - 11 61014/~313 SllÂ¥130 bIESWrIN 133MS Della Terra ountain Chateau ./19/9 NI NO,1Â¥0NnO,I Ill INOILÂ¥//I///9 UPPER FLOOR MAIN FLOOR 4'*2'0 BRICK LEDGE 4XA BRICK LEDGE 8 ENTRY CactclobIC .......1â€ž.- A= â€ž91/9 31439 . =-2 . =00.- aloo-Id NIVIA .LNEW39VG 3501 Fall River Road, Estes Park, CO 80311 LEVEL BREAKFAST T ROUND, 3/'" NO~NOJ ,/4~ NOSIN'J FROM UF/ER LEvEL GEIINO31,Â£/1914lacIEI WOhid 911713Ct leÂ«>TO,-1,/ 99nall gl all kg aNE lilli unall 99 9Itll Of 2007 EMI JO I I I / A ./ - f- Wn. gill-/ PLANTER AREA - RETAINING WALL 61Â«.~ ~OV~0 1-4 1.0 ./----* - I N \ 00Vhl0100' >lklvd S31S3 , W8 WN / 0-72 / \ Â§3 r- aVOB hIEIAR:[ 11Â¥3 Loge <81 m p H 8:q; 1 -0 0 A l CS -1 28 R 1 5 % m /.... / Ed:w 19Â¥=I>1Â¥3~38 9 038 AV31VHO NIÂ¥1NnOIN VMEI31 Â¥1130 a: e" 2 1 -3 2# 0 2% g 2% E . 11 1 4 1 1 331 3/3 #g 38/.2.2.9 Â¥"RE *ma l 3 11 Mil 2, a iii J.gle:Me:'5* 0 1 + 8 5, g 1 al ba&888bmiab 2222222022 a....a...... r.Imaa m - - 0% 5 E % 2 gli i =* & g R W Z LE- %1"m &8 . 1 A # *memwi g =m m SEN- 23 E Â¥*=84 W E 01 Â§ 9%"2"*U ,&"EN,18&*22 800Â§Â§%038&8181/1 1:111/21 2/1326&9Â§8838Â° 3 23//12 st@55 12 **55:"@ m ass 51$572~.1 212:801*1(i~52 585338dOM50~0*8; 89*2.21* al~malm-~saSia@Â§Â§15& betitte S305â€¢~ ~8 9*EVjtÂ¥5 & 4~9 E. 0 3 i 1 Z W 39 2 0 :11 3 1 11 i Â¥ ta 9 - 1 0 iER,0, 1 1 8 0 5 W 8 3*:- a =2 - -m ME 1 EN 9-1 6 8 E -5 - WEE R 2 5% g 3 8,210 i ZE:,1 522 2 g g . 8 29 m:gg 9 :31 W m W W- 23 0 5 :ii: h : O 6 NE: *55% 2- ER- H 0 .4 Â¥ . I -td 01:31 %1Â§&% Ul 3% g :g â€¢ 1 22 2 - I. Â¥=M= g m E~* mky :W:= 6 - 026 .i - EL R @ 9 :Rf CR R::Mm: B:w#R 5%8 2 Eg~ 9 0 4/ 8 j Er.,â€¢mies,91:2: IMI#1*21!gly 0 *0*0el# 5@28* 113 91* B E*Â§%12 Eli lililiES@12 4. b_ 85*14 E EN 5 =<.u--50==.2=5 SE=EREAL= 3 ZENESEE ZE=*EE ZiE 2â‚¬LRE ZEME Sm %93 EEREagEÂ¥20=NEW @. i U: 8% 5Â° 211 -5 :a Â·W wd 1 ..0 SM 2 1. 9 1=81@: EN Z Sm 15 W 61Â£1 4 4Â¥04 : im I "IN im: im #9"6:: 58 m am a 22* Ne... *~ ~ q *my ~~ ~~ i ~m ~~ E- :,1 5 i 1 01 8 kil lit ..15=Zi M NEE K M %13 b Ll' 1 im: I: 1 E:i; i a W .i @Â§ *5 11* g = tiL.i. i . :r. 1 1% 08 m = eg Â° i~ ~~ 08 j,* Ilsk ~ 21â€¢22#mg '- @45- -1 8 88 19 1 1 W 111 0Â§.02 *68 1 8- aliti 0 Sm E MI m .GiE.- =0*6 elm: - biz W:j -:45 ~~ % 93Â§05W :WH~M M N*~~~~ ~*,.&g @ 08 % w '- 8*3 te# Magil! id i; 135,WEER @211, i@ m TEd@61 FW . ea 0% E,Ym@ g L Â©2 h i: 46-92 i Hill E E a ie =2 :Za *20.â€¢liw 01 97 . 0 in02 2 0200 "AZZZEEN 28,1, 2,29 ZER@NE ***filigili OPE Immi '8Â§ . Non@ 7/pid&Â§ .52 i. 3.1- MEL ms=&3 :p:@Â° EZ 3 m je . 'W:@0-til, 0 5 ,Â¥111Â§23&tkg:* 24:2Â¥1= 44~ %*81=*C,Eig=*WW"i=*=12=ZC= i!420 w r. 2*w *:% 1 ##~I~ZQDIE41%1i~~ii 3 e illimmE 1:â€¢gagEER:gam: MEN immil . _:Egiall=-glite i Hi .EN 98 881 1 21 EN= 2 2% 0 EMI 0 m Z 0% e ia /0.28 li - 6 8 *m EW zE 9 15 88 i 0, W Â§2.80 4 e k \ 9 8 14 00 0 1 50-NE: m es /-812 *6 3 Â£ 8 41 , 31 Â£559; 68 2,3 ; illi E a Em w ZE A.&1 ? RU, - maa=m de 59% 8 02/0 02 @ 560 W & IWOB*0 ~0 - %&Â§ :9 E id m =i 6: 1 %58 8 9 bÂ® liC:E Z 8 9-Â¥82 2 . - 52% f R g *A NX 9 1/2 =E â€ž mize i .m 0,3 m 6 8 18 8 I a :111 -0 57 %1 * =~9e *W â€ž= 7%:32# %8 4 211 : 19 1 #61 1 im @ : 1/ w /8,8 R 8 0 E 'ullam.--s//Bah Ing a Mil MÂ® 1 -- 0/ 2' pl & Ii"i:i *af i BA - 06*RE i i 201 i SE#mil= 20 19 622 1 w 0 1, . im 29 em 2 59 ~ 288/ r:~ 50=Em =00 &-Cau & in= em eÂ¥**/m. /: ~y2%8~% 8W *~ 684 R 9 0 ; *% 1% i 842% i * 13 m x -=3=5 2. 1; 2 8 lit - 21&69 2 3 1: Ml:59 esl di j Â® 4B di 11*li 1 82 2%2 22 .1 i -ili IN inmi:giE i I 11 BEâ‚¬.0 * 11 2 1 i /:a i=Ril.-it; i Bia !Â·imeate IN a 0. 89= El milul im ailli:El d m IN Bu~ SE Cw 18*@+209 d . N A -dalâ€¢- W Q m 4-E @ E h % M A .210 W S mi 12 f CÂ» 2 Z .1 00 v. 28 058- 23 5' 11 00 */0/8.Z Emb ,02 8:5Â¥â€¢M.%% BE E %+-~ 2 g 3*~3@@~0 ~%~ 5â€¢% *5~8 k*m *@2~ gits 2 @348* 84= 614Â§1~ od,â€¢d E. m /4. 1 1 . 8033N lonals SN~~03#WddÂ¥ 3HL RIVA 30Nn~NO0 NI '3 WON>I 0103dSNI ]H.1 30 1S38 3 Hi 1 Sat N 990Â£2 838)NON (31~0N00 0/0Â¥ld 30 S310N 3110 0310N SSnin 'NOUDWIM 803 1031Â»0 H *3NI0N3 G3NO NI I 30 MAMINIM LOOZ '0 1 h138M31d3S 838,'InNI ONIMVHO 2 6) 3NOHd SNOISI/\38 Â·03U103dS BallÂ¥380 11Â¥00 UNÂ·n A 30'Â¢B N'rid ONIFff,3 HORIZONTAL 31kleÂ¥3 381% ..01Â¥0 31IS 01.0- ECIFICATIONS MANUF MANUFACTURER O.072 [2'(M] RPEN NO EACH FACE OF THE OPONNG, BOLT LAYOUT AND DETAILS EXPANSION JOINT THESE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS W BE USED TO CONSTRUCT TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU BED AND ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DIMENS OF FOOTING ABBREVIATIONS: 70/NH031030 1031030 3NIDN3 3H1 '1Â¥101.33~ ~1 ONnE SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE CLOUDED. ANY VARIATIONS NOT CLO ENTRAINMENT SHALL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE SURE THE STRUCTURE CREI~TRANCICO~EIVCOPY AMID RETAIN ONE COPY NOT RE UMENTS OR COPY STANDARD PRI THE BASIS OF CONCRETE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PLUNEI NOT BE CONSIDERED CHANGES TO THE CONTRACT DOCUM CAL 1. 1.2 FOR CAT. N AILS INCLUDING B ING AND HANGERS 'Obl003B ,60 1031 HOIN 11190088 38 MAMINIM 17 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. SHALL RECEIVE RADIOGRAPHIC OR ULTI~SONIC TESTING. 614 AND 1615 Of IBC REQUIRED Erf THE LOCAL. BUILDING DEPARTMENT ANY 61]HOHM 3Nt)83130 01 316 NO ONIAIMMV 3dSNI nd 1031]HOEÂ¥ 31Â·11 'SNOUÂ¥08103dS 3111 NI 03NIÂ¥1N0J 3S0111 ONÂ¥ SON CEMENT TO INSURE THE GROUT CELLS AR FREE OF REDUNED ON SHOP DeWINGS FO STRUCTU CERMED INSPECTOR. FT 1 S THE OV/NERS BILITY TO [11] STRUCTURE AS PER TABLE 1604.5. DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONFORMING TO ASTM *185. MESH SHALL BE LAPPED M INSPECTOR. ASSIGNED FOR CONFORMANCE TO TH RY IN ACCORDANCE MTH THE REQUIREME S 34 01 '03103W 'AL.1 IN]Mon AND ROOF KING LAYOUT, DETAILS AND CHOR BOLTS AND EMBED PLATES PRIOR TO AND DURING THE PLACEMENT Of- EER OF RECORD MUST BE -SHOOH â‚¬ NIHL 5.0 STRUCTURAL SHOP DRAWINGS: ED CONCRETE. 0 3,(,1 SNOGI,ACUd dIHSNÂ¥,1),HOM 318Â¥OiddÂ¥ 3Â»U (INV 403 33]NI 1 7/n10(IH SLAB SHALL BE FINISHED IN SnNA 'NOU 1SI0r 3111 1Â¥ SlIVN 1, 1.0 FOR CAT. 1. 1.15 FOR CAL. 111. 1.15 FOR CAT. IV REINFORCI *15, GRZE 60 F EXCEPT GRADE 40 FOR TIES 1.O FOR CAT 11 SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR PAD SIZES. RER'S SPECIFICATIONS. S 51108 1Â¥ SNO O BE PUCED WI ENT TO THE EN SECOND GUST]: 00 AND Aa BUILDING CODE. SPUCE. OFFSET FOR BARS IN ONE LAYER BY AT AS SPACERS WHEN NO OTHER - NIVID 01 13TIÂ¥@Â¥d NOISN31 EINFOR SE VEIL SECURED IN POS AL A MINIM Nun089 01 MOIhid NIWGH 01 (aUIMHGd 36 11bWS 3 3Ht 0-nOHS 03rlnSSÂ¥ - NIn,9 01 NÂ¥1001(]N3dk0d ISS33dr100 51531 GIllÂ¥3 30 301L0N A-1311 H.113 V~ SPECIFIED IN JOINT LOCATIONS T CAVATING OF STEEL 'SN,Id NO *o,rn 1-100 31Â¥ld Ino 0]l:1183A 38 11Â¢HS NOUWBOJNI 310PfllÂ¥AÂ¥ lS]9 3HL 031NtÂ¥d dOH REINFORCIN ED UP UN 0 11Â·11Â¥3HS NOT INDICATE THE CONT~CTORS MEANS, METHODS, SONIAMK] S.10111HNIÂ¥ 01 1 FOR THE H1Â¥3N38 030Â¥ld 38 0-InOHS 010/30 0 80 13AnID ASCE 7 CHffECT PRIOR TO C Â·H33N NH031039 EG MO SONUmal 3#L 11%6130 30 ~ ri"0033 SÂ¥ SDN1011n8 MOklj Mlked ' 03Â£3d m 0302 BE IN ACCO 61 IFICATION FACTOR: NOO 01 SURE 1118: -u ...2 -04 N / 2 00Vhl0100 '>IhIVd S31S3 .. WNEs / aVOk:1 h13Alk:1 11Â¥=I LOSE li qui 3%11 r 1 3// s m ME r- / Am@ 9 I 00 1SV=I>1Â¥3hIEI 9 038 nV31VHO NIÂ¥1NnOIN Vblhl31 Â¥1130 E=E emil :\-. / 10 V "A 1 1 ZI...Z. EMUZZZ~ZZ D : 1 1 1 lilli -. 2@*SEEZE .906 , ~ 6 elsebbibb. .o-.z .0.9z .0-19 tw .9-.ZZ .0-.9 /..9/ ..O-.E 0 X.X.X.X. ......... I - 41 0.0.0.0.0 h : -, : 4 4 10 : .9-.Â£1 1,1,1,1 JI(%186 < **XXXXXX 0-w b 6 6 6 6 6 6 10 ' 6 -tiur ,Â§55 .11111 1-1 111 14' 8& :=2%5 2 ZitE 2:Z:ZE!/1/2 1,IW h lilli .-\5 .::S . I IC 33mi Z3E@ r-----------------------t-------1 1 WC 11 W 0 W . 1 11 11 11 63%%%%% 6 9 b.-2.2 T . 2 I.N.N.19 . P .. .0-,9 .0-.C .2-.,1 tb, .i-,Z ....E .8-1,/ .0.9 .0.9 1 11 it Em' 1 1- 15 1 *MI ll . 1/JL, Ill| 4 b h h k k 1 L.---- 1 - MI.* 1 1 2 6 1 1 1 r---7 i 3 Wbbbbb 11 10 I le 1 2 L---d h 11 ~ dll .11 '~ '~ ~ ' | -'' r-41 -1 le: 0 11 1 1 T t# rd f' fr t.. 1 Latit [-T--1 1 - 1 O s : a - a 9 Id, 1Â¤ I M jÂ»- mir ~ e =Al c Â· I.L. ;ce.22 1 L-1 11 al 1 10 0. k O TII 11 1 . . , 1 1 bi -H-/--1----ir \ 1 1 /. 1 ,- I -H .. ....g ,\ / . 2 L+J E ....8 El k 1 41 L 2 - WO a.* 1 r--J MS . - I~ W. L_-1 1 1 4 k .4 eli 4-,-1-2 el h 0: r-------7 52 - b - 4 1- 4 1 1 1 + c L- I--3 | r-tA 4 1 .4-J r----7 h hi , 1 19 3 0 11 .Lf 4 ?1 | 01 2 11 & 1 -I- .-- r-------7 -9+4 1 4-0 -4-- -- 65 23 1 LK. &% 2-T,15,:~jl).Le--=le 4-1- i : 4+ .~1 L--1--3--i-J 2 I JEL UL31-4 / 4 L_~-1 1 1 2 L-1-3 . 1 1 L----J M E-1--1 2 :-1-4 T 1 1 t~F-1 1 1 4 t. T -1. 2 1 1 1 i i k 1 ! 1 L---- F ~ 3Â· a L--4---1 i -232: 37 . 1 1 r ' - -\ 1. F--1-7 r-~-7 ~ ~ i-- -J I 1 1 1 6---- -1 + -- 1 1 1 I E-Tn it 21--i 1 9.-f 1 1 0-J , -r T I~- -cÂ·Â·Â·- ~' ~ty 4 -0-Â·9 ~:0-Â·2, N Ill 1-.-1 1-0-1 L--1--J 1 '-IS 2 7 E-T-1 5 L---t---3 M f Alr-+i 1 Ei -1 2 ~ *BE * 111 1 4 m. 1 1 9 1%*i -H. -*i- L-4--J 1,1 2 2 ..... ETE- 1 2 LU . ~. . L-,6-Â·' 1 1 ' l-=-1 I I li - .,/2 L-.9 _.- .9/C 6.-St .5-141 .lt-,0, ..A L-,9 - 14, + 1 -- i. 1 1 Il I [-2 k - : 4 Â«1 0 \. r---/ - k 1 1 1 10 1 h LL---3 ~ 6 Â«3 : | ~ .9,9 9-,Â£ 1 I 1 + 4 1 a. F V . . ' 1 h. r-----1 1- 11 . 1 -1 1 1 4.. 1 1 . 1 h 9=r \1// - 0 1 1 2 /ei| aE.--6+ 1-[,-gic.).* 2 -p-4 + FI-~ -,j L 2 Â·44- -0- 1 2? 2 6-----J 19 1 -0- +-=r I I i ,Â£--T--1 k E-1-3 6.- 1 L-------1 - L--_-__-J - . 1 4 L_--J _~. 0 _~ 4 -4 3 L--1-1 2 . 1 1 * 5 ' F-t-1 r-1--' 4 E--1.-1 L.~_.., l._._.----, C~ 0 11 1 0- h -e.-t - 1 1 L-1.-3 i Lid L-1-1 N . 1 %44 - 1 Irl a. Z 3 *1.4 = .6 ~~ rg~ < 1 13 -4 1-12 + 4-:-4- rT-1 2. - 9 ms 21 F LtJ T. e -1 . -34-1 2 D t. 1 - plÂ·-1 r 1 11 11 # ' f LE--1 1, 1 1- th <\1 21~-f,- ..4-4 I I I i i /r--7 1 2 1 1 l' 1.1 IZ i .O-,2 (21 1 b 4 1 1 --1 1, 1 01-.9 / ../1 01-.3 .9-.9 A - 1 .gLELL-, W i b 7 2, c C ! l_-1.- ~ .2/4 9-.C 5 1 , E-T-1 041 211 n - b It & 1 24- I l. i 3 i.Â· i , -1 il T -1 - 12 - 1 1 1 L.4--1 1 - 7. 0 .0-,9 .0-,C' 1 .9-,El 2 f._T-Ri I L-------1 . A .1 k.Â¢.1 .9-gl 1 .0-.Â£ .0-,9 a. 1 1.9-91 -4 2 . Ff | r|--~nU.__ 1.*--ic - 4 + d Al ! 11531.8.. K .9-151 1 dl 9 . 6, 1. - L\~ 2 F- 1 . It ' 1 L.-1--1 -~ 5 181 0-Fjlli-7 + ' N 1 - 1 1 \ En-7 3- ---, _Wl- kE/ZISEP 3% 'Hi & 11 L.1.--, 4 1 PES .------' 1-7-1 2 I I 11, L-------1 1| ri-1- L---___J 20 la 911 7 U}W ' L--------1 W 0. 1 , .*/l 9-.l 01 . 1 I. f Â· ..11 ...}AA ,_,F-,-, 4, tz - * C ../Â£ 0-,iz f z-' r-T-1 r-T-~i ../Â£ O..tz 12 . 6-4-/ t. 4 1-,1 1 . 2 L.1-J L--4--1 ' L-1-3 2 ~ E-7--11 k S .FT-1 P \ + -r- P i I 1 ./ -I ! I r-------------------- 6 1 6-4- 11 5 .3 .01-.6 .90 i 0 .lin g-.1 c MATi Elk.Â£-32____ -__~- ---3=1- 1----f] [-1 [FE-_LF- e 1 el .[PJ 1 -1 / . . 1 2>-<= 1 1 l.-----*7 . Â£ i, / 2 c 't , , 4 Ap 7 3-191 11 -9..St .01.0, _ .8-,C = t-,L/-,0~ 1 . a .0-,S 1 ' a 1 &0. 1 1 -------- 3NnHO.1Â¥M 6.44-1 t~i- 3NnH:,1VM 1 11 4 A. 1 1 E--i-' \ . \ lip k El 12 i 1 19 7 | C El 1 9 . 211, 9 1-1't o N il . L+Ja- i 1 .Â¥/1 2-.ZI .Z-.Z .1/4 L 1-9 .1-.Z .,/1 Z..a 1 1 .L-,9 i.- i .0-z & : .9-,01 .L-,B f _, .0-..t % -~ 1 L 7 r------9 --- rJ L.~ r 7 [ 1-1 21':1~ ~ , L---------71 L------I 6------J 1 [----a---7L----~ -1-,-1 1lt LV--r-- - 1 5: 2 11 1 1 1 - .1 . , . 2]NIEli LOOZ'01 838~131 NVid NOilvaNnod SN0ISIA3U h138rlnN DNIAWBO 093 9# (L) ~O9.106 0~ -LI O--IKg AVI Â·0-0.01 0 9# .91 X.9-.9 X OS ONI100 NÂ¥ld N aNAO=1 180'-3. 8Â·-1 1 3/4- ~ 4 gÂ·_0Â» '3 mz / I / I 00Â¥hl0100 '>IhIVd 931$3 N 04 / \ \ im N. aVOk:1 k:IEIAIhl 11Â¥=I L09â‚¬ I Â¤ = 1 C I 1 g 1SV:IMÂ¥3%38 9 038 nV31VHO NIV1NnOIN Vhlk:I31 Â¥1130 Amill &/1 Exit // 8-2 N 5Â£ i 8. 00 508 2 C * O 11 I - 1 . . 19 -1- 1 4 ../Â£ 0-Â»2 f 2 .9- f 2 ....01 9 14,1 ,-.gr--f--3 3-9 f 2 .i/Â£ O-. 1 2 u. 1 : r-T-l | 24 6+J Ll-]R *:4 ..E.-t 1 1 I 11 It . L-4.-J L.-~-J & 0 1 L-1-3 0. r--1--9 11- r--1---1 Ri' / 1 41 .1 4 1 - L--~-- - --- -- - -1-17 ~ J Â·~ =* - 7 4, i ' -t L" t. 6 - 21 0 .el 6-.1 ~ L---- / , .. 1==-<= 1 . . . __...... J L----1 t-----------1 f 1 /K , 1 1.3 1 1. 0 24 ' .0-,5 '' .01-0 - .9-,SL .8-152 - t.k.Z-,01 1 .0-.9 1 .9-m /2 1 1 - 1= -- Il ---i- -.Ill --I- - -- - 3Nn,01Â¥M I 3NnH:'1Â¥M :r- 9291 LAA ---1 1 i\1 --r-~ 16 1 1, 1.'~ 4 71 4 4 ~ i '4: 1 -1 21 i e P. 1 : r'14 - 1 N IT /- : a.4-1 .1-3~ 1 1.- I 1 -in z-./1 .2-.Z â€žz/1 Jl-,5 L-,2 ..,4 3-,21 ~ .L-,9 [ j .0-,21 6 .9-,01 1' b .0-,21 , 1 - 1 .L-,9 14 11 f Â® 11 4 4 7 r---I r------7 J L / L----f- bill . -7----------J Â¥ . 1 ./-1- IS -1-Â¥ 1 1 : L..._J 2 2-1-3 L ---J 111 1 1 . 1 . U. Ik . . T 16 . 1 t. 1 1 -1__1______ ------4-OCCUBLI--- i-- 10 . 1 l 3 314 3 I I i : b L . 1 1 r 1 1-1 1 1 CL a. LLN 0: 2 2 1 . Z 0 . a. Fff r--7 C .4 ++4 1 4-----14 1 L-1-3 L.1-3 l.-1 fL Lr ra 1-1 1 . i 4 -01 . -s-Â·g el 1 1. 1 1 1 1 N .9-,9 : 11 j '7 4 2 1' .onE .9-,9 ./1-.// .9-,8 .01-,K .9-,9 .It-0,1 .9-,9 '.0-i .9.06 , 1 . 890LE 213801AN 92909 00 'SN ZE9Z NV-Id NOI1VON %3'NION' 1, 1# 3931100 HinO 838nnN ONIN,Â¥80 48 03N0 9 LOOZ '01 2138M31d3S SN0ISIA38 F4 8'-11 3/4' . 9d 1-6 ./e L 34'-10~ .Ol-,K 1 - 1.10: 00Â¥hl0100'>ihIVd S31S3 e: 8 ti 5 / : E . E 8&~ 1/ 1Hz %]827 m \ ~%3 % r- avoN h13Alk:1 11Â¥3 LOSE ,/9: #522 1 36*Â£ 3 mag ed *1 - 1SV=IMÂ¥3&8 9 038 nV31VHO NIÂ¥1NAOIN Â¥hlhl31 Â¥1130 - / UNR 923 8 1 CO = 5 :1:& SEZE \ / 25Â¥ 08 E T 2 5 . 0 - 0 .0 - . I O 1 1 Â¢0 1.-:E : :2 :2 32 -22 19.2 ~ 26/ be Ce Le 5 1 2 -: :-3 5 1 --i~-- m ki ki i: 2 i 6.6 5. %&El 30 . 3:@ Ri 0.-1 : 61%%2 232 21 h :: 2= 26 *= 1 @iZ _, 2 :f::' Sh. 4 =wy z-5 e=Zig 2=2 0 =S =m =e =0 CE 11 333 8: 1%,21 1,8 2 5 2% -21 69,7 - \00 -1 .\....\ ok T 2, 2 3 2 2, E Z 2 3 3 kE k? 46 #G s "21 f '58@Z WS& Ed -- -V -* ..W LL 3 23 P. 73 2.\ 4 0 7 b Â£=LE Z 3% 2% ~022 mE : (60110 18 101108d inISIOM) EP tuo 18 101108d 3~~9*) dit 0 ~mill X.,/1 9 408 *P 10 .21 * - c mli - 2"d. .' I ./ 2/I Eii - : 2!, (1831-0 111 131-08< 32111-ICM) - 7,182-~---- ME-=.51 , .*FT -r---1_______ ---- 1 3234 .... 1 83 *mO1)(1'.-KIVEr--1/ 7 .El--a-Wr-/-/-428/-/-Ilit--/T 10310-Â¥31,(IWisIsoFEr--~ 2 75/ ./1' a-=12/7/ -4---4- cuy .2 C.- 2 --t-------*8 --- --ill- 1 - V .--- -. N--1 3 &---- HsnuT ill-37Â£1 i'7-370-(C - - -~ - - - - - 8 (Heru) 1,1.Sh ti w 1/Â£ 1 (2 @I rehI] 7,-37Â£- ri~CÂ¥/~ I~[E _ _ tkyw - -@ --. U_- - - . D- S h - -1 ----- /247 eL C- 4, 2 7 -7 --- -Ill--Il -11 0- 1 i in = 4- - INIZE-zti--|1 L rip --4-ji-Ic- (Odd~0) -33131$ N'q la *1 11 -1--6---09-e==t -0,---- 11 1 + =r---11-721 21-1Â£11*.=33--31.11 1 -||6 1 1 |, .|i ~-.- -E-*---- Mt-- 91/1 1 .-JI--*.-.M~E~- -4(FT6 2<4741upgaip[43:151-----5-- --42f --11- 7 - M -Er â€ž 4,11 ..7 7-- -M---* -0 gill 11 1 1 Â§42* 1, 97--= 26 - - ---9127 -- 4-1- ---__ -i-/EL:11 11 I ' *Mi '~ 231.IZY-6 IEE HE - -4 l. I !- -DM=*l a.]dit -41 1,/â€¢i I I I. 5 - 11 1 11 1 1 1,Â« 1 -- ..0 4 -- r. L -- --2*..2.-37 ..i- -- -- -- --,-231-& , r.</4/IB.1..d - *t: Wek Ltfcil I . --76-----2494\ D.1- / SI= - --.dk- - - Hsnu) 31 9/Â£ 11 1 .,~ 1 (rl --- I , I IÂ° lull j 1111 - -,z *SAU) Â¥1.9/Â£ I x ../f I (f) - - 7~.- ~-- Â£. 11 X .,/f_Lit - W â€¢ c. 1 2* --- --- --17-- 0 4- - mi--i-- U - z - q.l/-- ----- /7 1 -- - liM - -=-1-1-311-- -Fc-ne c 'An.-__. J / " a -- _a__*CUII6~2*FL Â· 4 Â·1=,21.LLÂ·ful I -1- I --L~- 3 ' L '0-0.,t O Â·:5Te-mi<&-EÂ¥< -. h 38. 70 -91 0 KILIZ alL4381 sisor 3â„¢1 --- E------ --1*-----1 ~_ (SM]H. 0 k] 10.Oic 3MniSICM) ~ fl--IZE-,-I-/2- _~r---- &94.0 Aa 103.Ok 38~ISICM) 1-~6 21*i 931 IWIn-10.St x ../f i ....0 'VA .111110 ,W ...4 k ~ A ./dig N - - 3-----1 23.2 . n 33%--- egi@ - --- Cg.,3m#*:r.:MiN - -2.- - - -1, 0 . :8:8 .. m :190 CS=or=]Yd)*:271) & e EM 2:ES -3 --1% EZZ 1112 It . - --il - - -il - - -a-L..t'1:97,11 - - ---E~Â£2Â£2/11 w - Lur -g--- ----WE ---- Mel. _.__._EL-__ ----- . 1~ Ml .9/Â£ 11 X .,A 1 ----Htm-- -- - 1.9/Â£ Hz ,,/1 LE)0---IZ~-2-2.--_ ------ I--*1=8 ------ . - . ---1* --- , t 1412:21:=:3 0* HOS /.S 10 B38)InN DNIM'A,0 0* HOS 0.Â£ ZO NV-Id ONIIAIVBB Â» 1. 11. 11 1 4 Â·3~~3'1~ 2~ONQS ',01 dn H 91/Per SSH 20 '/1"4 SSH *0 3ZIS >Ihim rlla ONIH~~ON;>FTg =111110*j~S~EL|~A~~(~ ~1- i.LJ i. L ' 1 -i-,-2-111 | 6 -22 ~EAT~ (2) wAJ J.. 11 (~ f41. i ~311 1 LJ gLI I , 2.-2*8 1 M 'Fof i/8. 2-2,6 / I / 00Â¥B0100 '>IhIVd S31S3 alibA fi - - LL Z WS:- / i %Â§ Em avoN B3AIB 11Â¥:I L09Â£ ,* ~i iN l\, 0 1 1 5 Of z 1 g 1SV:I>1Â¥3~38 9 a38 nV31VHO NIÂ¥1NnOIN VER:I31 Â¥1130 ./ MI,8 1 @Emela / 0 0 ? 9 r % 1 - ijfs ---- m: 42.2 ':*- -,,,' : 05 8 1 Z * O . < m38 Ir-~% .El *.I/<-9 u - 23 1 .. (0]ddOMO) M-3,2 mlmS .51 11 .,n 9 4 ~ WE (=0=313912:) -1111111111111111 (SaÂ·110 AE 10310Mc 3NfUSIOM) air 0 3 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - D m,38 mn,19 8.1.2/f ' 0 2 LI...1111 1 1 M JDS*ENT* - - O,3 d --- q '80 \ \ 24 -*- 3 1 ---2 --42- 3%%4 --1---71 (994.0 1-1 1)2-0& *ICM) 9 02%Â§ Er 2. (Â£940 U EH_08c 3MaisICM) - â€¢106 MVÂ·1110 .51 , .,4 1 -- -- E E T*8% -Â§---- -----30-3T-0.m.airim-siaorxi)) .~ Z: ZF> 10225 --- 993Â£ mÂ·rins ,91 * .Vt i $:EA -8-a 1-- ..9.. 5 --- 1 .0 le -- L-- <-SALÂ·e FUV 2.-23<i-------- 4-YT~ a -0 ./ V. *3~21*aEL-Â§47&~7-23*k ~- 'HsfrU) #1.8/L KI x .'~~ t (f '~~~~~~f:11 ---- - 4 % 10 31-4-1 - 1 Q /\... --- ----- -_L___- 00 -2 -S --/-01/Imi#*42/-/---/U-=-/ 7 4% --eq-- -- - - - - Ill-=.I ~ r . L .(BO) *7 -mts gz],OWA I -2Â£/ . -| *8 - 10 g 1---------1- N E -' 1.-1 O ... ig li. A--------4- 21 18 F---1IJ'/- 1/- i BE 2 1: Id I -lamj) m38 mis gzxot/1 4 < ~ CHSn-13) 038 -mls 92101/A o =IZE, IZZLZE-F-/ Tu 4 -2 UM g:3 25. .<Z 2-0 . 1% 2&3 11 24 --7 -93 //----------4---,4 - - Q. :9 .188 .SEE 0 19 - .j ;2Â§ 26: 5@ER. 9 -*- 4 9=Z 5:Â¥-1 2-1._---.o- .-*11== 6/Â£1 1 ~414444~49JLJi-EE=it C ili lit ik 464.92 0.-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 . 2. . 8 ti------Uki 11111111 &1142 -- --..1- - - --P-- --22- 4----- I - 0- 2.10 2>: 025:22 , 1- - - - Zi~r:,7-Rn -rit~44,~7 - -h---- 3 --1. Evel_ 4- T.ft.Jit-21 - E....2~1:2 21_--3--It-1----CZIEI- ma -._9.-12"f# -~I* -- il- 1-- 1- 1 /1 2- 1. ...6./2 ---- ti r--1 1 ' #U-21=13-ll -____ ... ---1 --- uial SASOrem~ -43:%~ri~- - (13,1.0 13 12310& 38Â·USK#1) (g]H.0 11 13310& 33*LSICM) .. 0 52 62 0 fOE vivMiS .61 * .VE i 9 viE MÂ¥1019,St * ..4 5 0.4/ /*21 (SaID AE 10 LOZId 3NflSICâ€¢I) e zifail=1-6 I#Iij:*- I-:-i,@ - i53C2 C WÂ¥ MY<no ZI : i'r ~ 0 0 RE:1 (Sallo U mload 38mSI0M) , :E- m7021 I#&.1.- -de- -.A - - ---61srre= MAB MYmo .21 x ../f 9 :-_,IL_,Lk...1/L U.LVI 1.1 %2BA 2ZEa r-1 'ro- Mili Ycli~.Njt- mim- i . Mas minlo .ZI x .,/Â£ 9- I - -FF- 01. --1,4 .~--T---99--f-ti--r----1-_17: . *%0 lilli .21 /4 w 4 :21-----24 -F--1- , I. ('Sn-UJ~-38 -als 0- 1 1 3'r.*I -U",1-1 g :EE \ :6Â£1 i._ 3â‚¬gp~ 372-TC 17n Izr =(@algal,LE-2511 1 jb *-33Â§33--E k - =32--~0 Aj~,- 6 140/8 --- _k---*--*--- -I:. 3- h L -63* ..9 -- i_.IL_ e g - %35 ECÂ° EIS - rpl- 5 ------4,-__-_24: 3132:9 *Â¥_~ -/bi~-/MIEÂ¥-- ~--39 ---14 EIHimil]<aLMAL.01_.1-----it~iftiED _2 â‚¬â€¢ L.- m-- - ~ j I ._Mnit-n.guu jil.Llf)- -1 - - - - izil~ 1~z-~*- 2 3- - - 4- GR.-3" -%1- 7"4ii.ui. RriN~- IF-1--:y .-i~ik-41-3 0-0..2 01â€¢,olro goiNET--~ (.9.-Iii MI,lil 111IS 9 - 1,00 -131-s WEN 1 .mo .ZI I .9/1 5 /1 1 (~snÂ·uDi-37ZTE3/7 W I--1 1-1 1 11-III- - - -2,1 --------- ill-- --- I 3NnH01Vrl ''+ k , 01= .- 1 3NnH01Â¥M - el E NI:Â§46% :0* - 90.5 28 m . Â£.Â¢4 :gd - . 1 1 I . 9, Â°, 1 ----- 1 1 - .<.-9 .*I- 4 E r . a. 1%67- :il ZZ -1 - 51 4-0. It 0 \ - N m N 05 0 -4 - N I . - 3 -- a /1-\1 r t/--- Ld 1- Il--I- 4 d U 66 m .0 0-0/ : a 9 90 --4 LAT---1 12 4. u . ti . N r- v _~.0 -la. \ . â€ž -2-1 y. -- ---2-1 __=L_----I - --0 .0/0 5- --T- 8~: BM' pl~W W '0 Z 1 ,-------- - - 81/ 9-- ; 1 - ---=r==24 -L- -vvB----- -- L__ICE-___ 09 g , 2% t-4- ''X Er- 41 -i.-1--- -Iligi- 1 \.L_ - OL - _ 00 Â§ o m JET-- 1 Â·Crcr- lili â‚¬ -a. 1. 1 n /2 \ li OGâ„¢) 1.1.9/. " '.~/C I (11/4 21 k.711 ~ L X [I(Hsn-j) w .s/Â£ it x ./c L (Z) lilli p, fl 2 _'' fl.:'.'k u -~ 13%=2,1 imWE -1-~ i I ..7 4 1 521@90 . 1 4%./ -t--- 1 i<207- fIARI " . SM33NIO 990LZ 838MAN 1 ONÂ¥ 80013 H 838MAN ON MVHC] - ZE( Â£6) 3NOH :*8 0]NO 3 1110 mot '01 H381(31d3S . en,1 1OH HlÂ¥3N]8 SN0ISIA38 NÂ¥ld ONIINVE:1=1 =1002:1 hIEI/ 0013 hladdn 6 3/40 1 7 GLULAM -2*6 5-2,6 ~ 5-216 2 VI 1 11 1 7. TRGIED 2,10 M ONI}138 INI)0018 ~8']M /â€¢ HlOIM ne x .01 * .1 1 /â€¢ HLOW Ma x .01 .2 1 */144 SSH CO m,IN plrAI 1 1 1 1 31'fld 3SÂ¥8 3ZIS >Ihill S.110[l N929Â¥ 0.2/ I S.1108 N9ZTV 0.2 7/8" T,11 360's 0-~J-ull -l~~-__ L -_|_ 11.L.=ij.-L --3 Stg' 0.2 31n03H0S NINA100 /â€¢ X .0 1 .2 1 9 1/MXC SSH ZO 1 9 1/ixÂ£*/ SSH 10 76412- 'S3003 13NVd SonlS ONI . 74&*Edo 3018 C EATH HOT TUB TJI 360's COLUMN T 11 7/r 1 2# 0 241 0 -----h I . 0 00Â¥hl0100 '>lk:IVd 93193 %8~ (\1 ek : 2 geÂ¥- E u. z 5 2887 / aVOW hl3Alhl 11Â¥=I Loge - 6 0 6 J . .i I R I 1 W im# Cr, 1SV=I>IÂ¥3238 9 038 AÂ¥31Â¥HO NIÂ¥1NnOI/\I Vk:IhI31 V1130 ,/ 9% 00 0 28 g D : -SE WE N \ 1 1 7 A , '.0* :shal#0- r-t444-47-11=- 1,719 MFLA, . 4 91. UL m. . 7,2i~-~--Tifi? i~iirkÂ·---4--Â·,l--L_--L i 1- - 4 _1 b _ al E 1 91 . 1 1 - -pi+ 91 1/1-----3---:ZE -ZEr C I.= I = L -1-*--E lili 4 171 11 %0 L - -13Â» - a e - L.L - -1 -3Â°-T-1 ... -1 1! 0,'.no .11 1.9/1 5 < :. "Â¥Â·InÂ·16 -zi x .9/1 9 ~ *38 131-s 91*w, 7 Â·Â· . 7- | 1 L. - 0*131 Â®.9/Â£ 1 1 I.,/f i (rl El 1 it- - - -=91%*fri~ (c) Pi A g /t_.1 ---------- 3NnH0.LVM 1 1 LL. 3NnH0.LVM ..Wh--3 01 01 -u-yÂ¢f Ol b :1 4 5 Nt,Â¢6' - s.0.9% AL re.2 :5: \ 11*41) W .9/Â£ 11 x ./0 I (Z) ..282 laÂ¥ (}En@) U .9/. 11 , ./f l Ull / - U .~ - --\[RO 2/8*.9 --- --___-11/-3 M M = '27 -T ." 0;Lid - .. 3 "12 1.: W-6 ~ 1 @33&*-,4-~ I [4~ - - hs.Â·C -I---1 ikw/*1.9/Â£ 11 .../f . (C) L 11-31=4---- -tz -119 .12 . .,/c 01 - - - -Vil.1/E . I 1 1 1.lk-V-1 1 -9-/11.1.4 BA--1,2 1WlnlD /h 62 * .,/ [1].5 \ 1. P>,2 - 6/ 618 - --2?p.1 015 ' 4 N $ 2, 5Â§ 50 lj; lT*21111mbr-1 -10 -10 *),40 2 34 32 :Em 3: /3 85 J 1 1 - 6 6~ 2* Wi 08:Id 00 *2 0 5.09~ Irl ,[ /Â£ ' Sh{31.Ny 1 : U- 1 .0 6: U. W - -0 - .\ s.09f Wl 3, 4 11 ~Sheln 4: I I 1,1Â¤0 1,Â¥d Z 8,-9,2 mlnl~ .51 * .,/9 9 Iwrw ~vdS 2 â€¢v30~,wln-) 9,-1,z mlmo .g; d -. :242 :10 W .,1 : .,/9 1 (Z)~*38 39018 ]Â£30.,/5 r Ho Vrl .t~ x .Vi 1 - E) :mge 390a 4 W.. - dill X - jj L- 16 2,- :i S~ il /*4 . O : O.6 0 01 ./ S 5* 1&1 401 1 1 111 l . * 7 -Ar. , 1 29- % 3 F- 111 LU ME BE-3 imi /2@Ze ex' 1 -1 00 0 - 11-111,9-1.-.-11 -E- BA-jig 1.mD -tz x .0/9 01 thr,1 / 11 ]/5,7 -867 -7- -4. 1 11 2.BA-,1 -no .1/t 92 x .,/U a \ 610 - 0 .10 i;: FiliI -r Â¥ 2Â»J i 131?j eiL- It: ti~.;iw : -4-fr---~*~_-~pLIÂ©~7_... 2~ji~~ 15 N22 o Y N 30,1 885:=C 3 3 4 1 15 51 28 80 iiI Im h . Z J 4 -- Al I Q 0 b :0 ?65 11 0 - -1 mi 2.. d :E '2 -0 91: ELAR 14*f --- ~ i M N j 6 -,5 Â§3 595 .pi: __ 7- - .le S ---- .U------ -- g -1 332 8:0 %%%Fm O 1 -88 22* i:Eaw E-3-7F-- i *:W g:E er.0 Â» m:.2 1%3 2â‚¬ * 0% Al eig-1, '9 1 - ... I .0 z .... C.) 10 -.2 ..'15 .LA $ I ../t g -1 CO -]. f , Sill~B~%0 890LE :~138â€¢ 031'Obld NÂ¥ld ONIIN 8,Â«-IN 0NIMV80 ~CniS DN1>1~.~~ 1!:t &34 O ixt ) 38 01 SU30FOH .01& 1 dn B SCALS ONI>1 9.Z--f 3Sn '0 *O-N-n SONING d 3:1 01 ~ingld m: .*. / I - u / 00Â¥20100'>INVd salsa WNES / u. 5 8~7 / \ %3 - Â§2 r- OVOE hl3Alhl 11Â¥3 I. 09Â£ 5 2 1 668 9 M %@RF \ - 1SV=I>1Â¥3hle 9 038 nÂ¥31Â¥HO NIV1NnOIN Vhlbl31 V1130 E/mE . 8 8 .:\ .//// i KI ~ M T & E CO IL a. c} o M ... 29 gS 12 - le El . 21 â‚¬4 b mt t: RE W! 51Â¥Aci 00 ::. 9 9 08 : 007 E S Z 2% mi . 31:': (00 .A < O 2.i in 54:9= 8 ,& 22 g: 0= * E la g:2 . 58 5 E.4 0- 8 :wooo ~ 9/ 69: .b w E *o 5 li HU Ei 3:LE@ 0 . 18 38 I I I I I I I ~~ o 82 *Eb 6* Â§/ 2~ gil .21 JZ -11 [-3--4- m @~1= 0- 23 D t. E .2.8 LU Â§% Sama MES =!1%1; - 11 â‚¬ M W /O .aj I Id L _iL 91 --~~~--~ Â·Zi . -3/11_ _ 4 #*6 11Â¥38 WRD .El x .9/1-9 ~. F---T J SSn81 N~10 t.-3-2.42214- - 2 - -- 4 - C/- ---2- ------- 23 --- EI--- - -'-â€¢ogoV~.tn-g IFI 1 - - . Rib 2aÂ¥ - ssnai M30% 1 j Up-43 1 1\2 1 + 1 1 1% 1 BO<Lilit -0/ ~ 40 1 1 '\1-3-' ir =--41 _u_t-_iAE1=11-L - - 1 1 4 \ 42 4 JA# r--TÂ· -râ€¢â€¢â€¢f--1 u r--1-1 - - - | | MA *le F M A 1 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ..,90' #41 1 #---- 11.-132- LÂ»ttl--4-44tl--4 '-1--11 - -1 11-Et- -1/11~ 11/1Â»Â«-1 605 433 1jt~tt~ I#*t--- 1 L +4+ 1-~ '\ a Ad ed ---- 0 -b- - 'f ssruu y.~a) g - 230810 D - - full -K- &G 1 Sm,1 1101110 . 1 7- 1 -0 Â«I J 3- E- 7 J IIi - 1 111 - - 't' --- 111 LE --- 1 D---- - r --C - 1.-1 .1 1 63 i Z .-I Swthu 83(1810 WIXI MlfÂ»09 . 23 11/ 3\\4 1%43=J I 1 ,_~zrr- -71 :-111 t-11 to l l 1-[-- ~'~~~~ 1 1 1 1 G:F=lili -N - 1 1 1 1-4- L_=IIi ,fi.-/.-Imm~ 48 I I i Â·56-~~~Ii-***iiiI--4---~--rr'/ _ -Imr:Ir:.. - -741 1 47#V | 1211.1111 -~'- E_t_ 11-9-4-4 ILT-7-1-1-2-11 1/4 41 1 1 /9,11*LIOE. - - 111 111 1 1 1 :d 11,38 13110.21 x .i/f-9 - ff'L .d E 1-i- - --mu=yu....9 '' 0 [2 - - .~ El ..il -1- H ---- ---t - - 62 3: M Id 46@ 13 131 =7-31 ~----2*=12 FE - ..2 11 ---- 71 31 y--1\. 5.1 }13081Â£ - - - f'33--1-- 1 l--1 1 1 LA 1 \1\4\,ti . 1 f '2 1 " '1- 1 1 1 1 P --c - I m391,WInlD.Z~ 11.9/1| S M)38 Intlmo Ja * 19/ I Q I -4 lili /1 1 lili 1IlllI 1 I i i i | I Il l I I I I I ~ ,4" h it~:/i~ I I i ' i ' l l I 1 l i l l i 6 Tr*rl 3 -1 1 I-ti-~7-t--7%~-,d~ 4 i I I I :i IN-ZI[.9/19 :TT t.k'kil I :i 1 1 1 1 Ibr /1 1 , | / 1 ~ 1 1 - ~rms Mn,â€¢ ~zi I ~wil , 1 UÂ·' [~ __ -~-1- T -1-1- 1- 1--1 -1 -1-1- T -1- --=J) 11 i .. ...~NlmN3 -,Venion 890LE 838MAN 1 931100 OOL) :18 03NG LOO '0 1 8387(31d3S 3NOHd SNOISIA38 NÂ¥ld SNIINVB:1 =IOON k:13d NVH IN OUS,n 838MAN DNIMÂ¥801 311ll ONIM 0 ~DOSSÂ¥ 22 OBM 18 C *3:A38 38 01 ln0*V-1 SSnkll NOI130&1SNOO 01 801 d,9037 son.~ ~Fâ‚¬ N~ 9)11 1Sn SOnlS DNI), 9,Z 14*;rn -, L = .9 l/Â£ /Ssnal B3H1O 11Â¥ HL S Al-Ind 0 IHIVJHS 11Â¥M M 803 838 S210 RIM HANGER LUS21 0 2 O.C f MA-10 TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE FOR 9â€¢PSON 30]IAONd 01 1138"3" 3% a 9*9 011Â¥31 /m rlÂ¥10 Ifyin-10 .81 x i,0/1 ---- / \ \ 00Â¥20103' >ihIVd S31S3 fii Â§52 i S e =Em 1 -3. OVOB h13Alk:1 11Â¥3 LOGE 1 i 1SV=IMÂ¥3hle 9 a38 nV31Â¥HO NIVINnOIN Vhlhl31 V113a ~ 1:6 Â§03% \ 5 8 Z / w 5 w , 2 1 -BO 8:82 \ 20% 0 38 0 i ,3 .CO 1, , . 0.- .,-,Â£ B .01 8 5 3,1,- 1 U.: OO %2 ..r... - ill G ''. -- 5 0 - E_ 1 46 w Â·Â· Â· J t P.- 4- , 65' w o. /8. WEEE 0 ne m k 7 -1 /.31- , ~~ ~ ~ ~,~ F~4 48 0 . 4 m % 2 -4 Wd I 0\ + 0 .3 4, . 00 â€¢ d 0 11- 19 -. %5 0 W 1 M . r O N . !2 91.- A x I E J N * e W & & 6 > .4 . )W 3.0 >8 g I i .e 116 b 'Im 2 ..0 N W ... Z g 0 14'' 00 Z. lile L EÂ¤ WE 6002 ' .O-.â€¢ \ JM 6 E]% C--FL,Â· Z 7'|,Â£- i 00 : I 1 9 g 1 u i. - 11 gil N r. 1 - 11 1L .. o - 17 %.- - - 1/ 1 ..i W t.. ... It w 11 - t~ 'Â· 11 :- \1/1 1 - I ?: 2-.- 0.11 . M A UE 0 / l Z' 23 0 f m N 4 LL I h: 3 xwoo '' ' 616 & w --7- 60 I ./1 .0-.C /-13'L XI -ml- M 4 -J ~ L V 9 y S. h i 2/ -. .O %8 C* g .ZI . ..0 0 JZ 4 '' 5 gam t .0 RÂ§ 9/9 1.. 0- 0 k b '' . .01 5 Â·Z Z : .4 -7.1.. 5 4 Cia /3773 1 e . 0 K jO, :-.; ~77- ~ 1: C,-I -; ~ ~:.ir';: ~~ < t362<i .~ - Pr-3 4-:cr----p---------=x--1 - 3 IE- ==-1 b 1- - 01 11 F.U' 9 4: 0.5 4- k 66 4 . W, . 53: -: A "*9 2 2 --E 420 P. XI . tri .4 I. w 64 S 6 50 8 e I -â€¢ W. -42.- .O 0 â€¢â€¢O ' r ' ' .,-,9 .0, <, 7 01 . .0-.* 5 0 r ' gil w . O - nj Nl' 2 6 8 :4.-- gli 9 -IME - - 9 ill .. .. I Il . 0 V. - 9 .l â‚¬ Fay - 4, 5 2 /2 4 - GR k m 4.1- ./ 4. 1 . 0 0 ... 3 60 2 k -. *Â¥ 12 0 - ==2 6 W 4.8 0 XI w w 2 â‚¬0 &2 SO -0 a 6 +0 0 . .41 . 1 ' I SN133N t# 3031100 Hl 890LE 2138YNON 0.-/ ao~ZT LOOL '01 83@n31d]S ONIONO#'13a 01 :18 03ND 30 SNOISI/38 03HSÂ¥M ONIOBOANG lkIOd3kl 003103 1.blodlbl H]3103 170d38 H03103 hl3d Nivblo-04 3 NY~ ~~ |||| ~ ~~F- h103'NÂ¥ld '3 80.1 NVId '33 9NIOHO JN Nfld 33S DNIOJOJNO Nfld 33S 7Â«Yift llÂ¥130 NOUVGNAO.3 llÂ¥130 NOUVONn03 13130 NOUVONROJ 1!Â¥130 NOUVONROd 4' CONCRETE SLAB GRADED GRAVEL â€ž0-,1 = .** t .On 1 - .*/Â£ */ SIMPSON 2-#4 T 8, 8 CB 1010 POST BASE tr%6Â°**lj DATION DETAIL OUNDATION DETAIL 8018d =. 2#1:NU~CHEOULE TO REINFORCING TO REINFORCING 1Bod]B H031039 DNIO'OjNI38 NVId 33S PRIOR ~- SEE PLAN ' CONCRETE SLAB Â· 4~ WASHED GRADED GRAVEL Al 1.11: ------ â€¢Imw -n \ \ 00Â¥hlo-100' >lk:Ivd S31S3 \\1 *%Â§ \ OVOB hl3AIB 11Â¥=I L09Â£ .wan i , g pimell 91/1 INEW \ /68 22:21 \ / W*W 1SV=IMÂ¥3&8 9 (138 nÂ¥31VHO NIVINnOIN Vhlhl31 Â¥1130 958 5/22 ./ -K---/ ./ 29% 04 53 , ..' . I. I. N. ,-S .OL 1, U, I. J 92 .8 :2 1 O, 2= W /0.*5 O./.O 4 , f =24=== Z@ W Eul 0 bl 0 1 --1 i~-Wi!% 26 m .1 . - -1. 4 + 18 E Z "0 e 1 - 46 I B. : 5 p 4 '1 N- k 'd k /1. A . I Id , . N .O , , P < 0 -b XI .. L 1 53.a : 1,- 2 5. i 11 :1 .I < 031 41 0 4 66 C. 11 41 11 .1 2 - 2 % 4 a. F .VE 113* 2 W m Z 2 4 .. L I 4 -1,- 7---a 0 ~ :11 9 i L U) -1 1 # 3 1 9Â« 0 1/91% f. \0 L 2 5 ~ ~ --4-2 ~ itt i -0 XI C k 40 twiNGE 9/1 Â¤* 8% Fgabs liaR 5013 m =SE ME: &31 L , ~ *"%982 -2- i~ 70dAl dÂ¥1.9-9 - Z W . I -4-lilli lili ZE ac ' 1 08 w Z Â»Â«40.\1 11 af . 15 11 83 ~i j 11 11 .4 41_ ~ iN 4 h Eh Ses' f - @ .'. . 11 . # 3031100 ZZ+Z SZZ 990LE 81â€¢InN 48 03No : 3 -/ LOOZ'01 838Mj SNOISIA38 clnUS 031100 1SM0/SO NOSdMIS V Hilft 2-#4 STEP SIZE SPUCE CONNECTION DN10803NON 01 ONIO/0-:INQU 01 LES 11 AND 111 TION PLAN a=Nt'.3~4 XY# H33=n 353,11 Sm36 001,1 ONÂ¢ &13<836 NO liON NÂ¥ld 33S 1V1NOZIM 24* MIN. F03HSâ„¢ 0, T Â·308 01 30IS erIS 31383NOO .Â¥ (0,03H /) D CONTINUOUS BARS TO Â·isor jo NTERSECTING '30*190 MAMINIM 3,[t GN,100Â¥ dinl# I.Nin 100 0 511Â¥38 1,315 1,Viel Â·ON38 013ld OIN 308 13HLO NO DNI>100-18 3Â·0,91 0 SNId ''~7-W~ PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN for Â· DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU BEING A PART OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TGN, R60W, WEST OF THE BTH P.M., THE CITY OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO GENERAL NOTES: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (SOURCE: LAND AMERICA' S TITLE COMMITMENT NO. TNEP0000254) BEGINNING AT A POINT WHERE THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST All required improvements shall be completed or guaranteed in accordance with EVDC 7.12 and 10.5K. ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., INTERSECTS THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 16, THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 00 The owner shall be required to provide for handicap accessibility in accordance SITE LOCATION SECONDS EAST 763.06 FEET; SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 784.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 36 with the A.D.A. and U.B.C. THENCE NORTH 75 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 389.23 FEETÂ· Approval of this development plan creates a vested right pursuant to Article 68 of THENCE SOUTH 37 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 112.06 FEET; Title C.R.S., as amended THENCE NORTH 67 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST 602.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 468.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION t~ ---_.Â· '37Â£9 1 BEGINNING, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. 12.726 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS. 3,3 1,\ --r-Â£<44/bT51 <Â«21(,Ae~~,,2~:~~J,~ -Â· . Â· 'BildoJ ,--, -3.ya~j:Â·73.Mo~--F~~h'l~~' fu-3*.=-4;9~;jt'/7 ~~ TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLING/GUEST UNITS 4 1) iMS,%725*;2.-3Â»\11, Ji.h-A 4> f/)92;Â·0Â·5'72~Â·4\1~29,-24*1*BLANS* CK Ab,ir.f-AÂ·rgk;$745&<tz<952.J.......If~~r.Il ~~' + Existing: 5 existing cabins '' 4 UP~Tw ~4 f .X (U 'r'.:l/4//Â·,vl ?4 4 , 4 existing motel rooms \ \.... .... ,: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3501 FALL RIVER ROAD 93 existing camp sites to be vacated '72' 2%&Â»\l'14.44<JI LT'(kILL--2-1544:31-4- Â·Â·iÂ«-f~-c-~d&3.6 -~.i-0- /-7 ...1 '~.{-- I -6 91: 9*W:4,Â£ ' +66!~. ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 20*&794'44<41 5 11.2.-/ r -- , Proposed: Proposed 14 room bed and breakfast facility f-1-?.-: f :-3,1 /%7 ' ~1 1 2 staff quarters in lower level Â·Â·-42.iÂ·1.rÂ·9:'~) 'iv,~,i~))~;fen-â‚¬Â·'.0.1 )Â·,; lo.Â«5~Â»~1<------ - .3.74Â©Â·.. 'Â·fh~,44,*2.~ ~-"Â·~~Â·4 1.,ii\...j.~tix...1.. 'tÂ·~Â·;~,~}fÂ·' ~-~ ~. lit 46:.{ n APPLICANT/OWNER: DELLA TERRA, LLC 3501 FALL RIVER ROAD > 4Â·.....CU/94â€¢'~~26:2:.V--=.-1:21 -3 '1:Mou SJH''h-AlL...Caa- PARKING SUMMARY Required Provided Sizes --i A-. . * -bÂ·:trÂ·b--/ - *- '-;42- -01 i Â· j' R: :~.Â·..--Â· Â·--2â€žr.- i, t UUÂ·- --I-Ji - -74@L~- ~~~'3 ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 (970) 586-4563 Â« Â°-344;DitÂ»*Â¤1- _- _ \Fati tiE-1-5/TiÂ·'-,...b~ ,~ .19'ft.. 74(49 j;11 ~...1, ..,44/ -/12 8./ ... - Bed & Breakfast standard parking spaces 14 14 9' x 19' w/ Parking Block , L \D ATrN: DARELL AND PAM AMELANG Bed & BreakfastNVedding Facility HC Parking 4 4 8' x 19' w/ 5' Load Zone Wedding Facility standard parking spaces 40 59 9' x 19' w/ Parking Block SURVEYOR: R.J.L. SURVEYS Total= 58 77 A~- j i itÂ·.Â·Â»f~ #-1.', 2Â·-,3,[ wif?(~ - ~'t..+3. ,~--4:..,.trAL14Â£13 -:- 1 4 '.f..i of Â·A.Â·;~ 4., %4773 15- 113 CAMERON DRIVE, SUITE B fHetihts (970) 226-3007 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT- 40' 4<Ial;2: FORT COLLINS, Colorado 80525 TWO STORY PLUS BASEMENT e.Â¢26' Â·. 1,1 'L, I . :fif.01:mpL %4 .02 .. ; p fe@-it.020~~Tiv-n-Â·7- L 14,,~d#~/&&.d~~-r --22.7-Â·.47,7'Â·.,* ~3''24Â£5.,.~-,<mje.' - w,&-9--~0-:,c GROSS PROJECT AREA- NET PROJECT AREA 12.726 ACRES @ 20% - 2.55 ACRES - NET PROJECT AREA A;- & foRY+tr> 4.t j 31 CIVIL ENGINEER: SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION '--Â·- 1&4 494jf.:0-5*YA&#fi,-2 ;ELV ys*& 1214t.,-6 2&~f 'int,ff?ft#**240$446*T177--,< .4. 4836 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE 554,355 SQ.FT. @ 20% - 108,871 SQ.FT. - NET PROJECT AREA .->224 : Molint i -0 :r:li ( â€že-, c ..\ 91 ,Â·. -Uiter/:Â¢ J j.;Â«94%4* fj&72-r-2* <CK>.91-20,21*/7.:Â·Â·- /--e.2siP'' AA'. i - -'Beaver.Mead . 744*3Â·:-.- FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 GRADE CALCULATION P 1,â€¢~I/*719. 1- W / ~3/f t 4, 1 L , -1-ne-~_~~,O -2 (970) 226-5334 West property line - 77' grade difference in 468.34 feet - 16% 13 ri N..7/ ./.0/j-=... .-- / East property line - 164' grade difference in 762.42 feet - 21% -A,b;,th##&2Avi'?5 ~-161;ENJJJ~%-<Â·, " 96'dgio :~~ft]~ ~ir~U.jitit 1.~18 31,1,,il~ki ,It,L~ Center property line - 125' grade difference in 752 feet - 19% 4,344-95-==J-4 -\.414.Â¢895/' -Â«â‚¬:A--,~ ~A /, +; - , , ..c,th, , .<j ~.1:...,t .~.hi 1 ~0Â¥Ly,f\J-1.li,J ./5 b'.... .,.I. .2>4 DENSITY CALCULATION FOR NET PROJECT AREA BUILDER: DARELL AND PAM AMELANG Cabins - 5400 sq.ft. plus 1800 sq.ft. (6% over 12% x 300 sq.ft.) - 7200 sq.ft./ unit HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES BN; [2%7-Filoossq.ift.p~s66000sq.~.(651531%1X 000Sqqftft)Â·~22440000ssq.ftft./~nit '-'Â·-- ~ -3-*~~<MQU/] fai'1 ' 4~'.)~'. , 1& ..-- 5 ., FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 5000 BOARDWALK, #16 ~~\1-1.-r--,--1-~&wr--~< <1.-Â·Â·,~6Â·-i:-4. 4 d',=scvfb.RAf tv 5 existing cabins @ 7200 sci.ft. each - 36,000 sgt (970) 493-5639 4 existing motel rooms @ 2400 sq.ft. each - 9,600 sq.ft. 14 b&b guest rooms @ 2400 sq.ft. each - 33,600 sq.ft. Â·--4.,Â·9,Â·, 1 !/~;Â·Â·i'-' ..._......i:~.7-t ...p 4 14 C K), '4 I/' '45.,v-h131%Â° , '\.M-7wn.FT'.,919?36,1~~74*47,-.: i :14 742*460cyÂ¢11., 9,32~ Xjyqzl.*tg;44~~1~~-541?'i~~,3t~L-Â·-~7~'9'lf* 2 1 ~\1*imi vu94- 0 ~ ARCHITECT: ARCHITECTURE WEST, LLC Total sq.ft, in guest accommodations - 79,200 sq.ft. 4700 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE 2 staff quarters - 2400 sq.ft. each - 4800 sq.ft. FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 Total sq.ft. including staff quarters - 84,000 sq.ft. VICINITY MAP (970) 207-0424 N.T. S. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: WEEKS & ASSOCIATES Gross land acre - 12.726 ac 4700 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE, SUITE 1 Less 80% (Entire site is above blueline) - 10.18 ac FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 (970) 225-2422 Net land acre - 2.55 ac Available land area - 110,903 sq.ft. Required land area - 84,000 sq.ft. ZONING -A- ACCOMMODATION PREPARED FOR: . Impervious coverage: INDEX OF SHEETS Della Terra, LLC Buildings: 11,650 sq.ft. 3501 Fall River Road SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Parking / Drives / Sidewalks: 73,265 sq.ft. 1 COVER Phone: (970) 586-4563 OWNER AND LIEN HOLDER'S STATEMENT Proposed: 84,915 sq.ft. Fax: (970) 498-9837 THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE OWNERS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR REFERENCE (RJL SURVEYS) THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS 2 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Allowed: 50% 277,172 sq.ft. DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ESTES VALLY 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN DEVELOPMENT CODE AND NAY OTHER ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, 4 EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN COLORADO, PERTAINING THERETO. 5 GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (50' SCALE) OWNERS: BENCHMARK 6 GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (30' SCALE)(EAST HALF) DESCRIPTION: PAMELA A. AMELANG - PRESIDENT 7 GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (30' SCALE)(WEST HALF) ELEVATIONS FOR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 8 SITE SECnONS MONUMENT STAMPED "STA 215+56", "EL AUDREY MILLER - SECRETARY 8218.75", LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHWEST 9 DETAIL SHEET CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE PROJECT ELEVATION OF SAID MONUMENT IS 8218.75 FEET. APPROVAL: 4[E Â©EOVE'.=11 APPROVED BY THE ESTES VALLEY PLANNING ~ SEP 1 1 2007 | ~ COMMISSION nAY OF 2007. Betty Hull, Chair PROJECT NO. NO. OF REVISIONS Date SEPTEMBER 11. 2007 Drawn D.M.C. CLIENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION COVER SHEET SHEET NO. Drite Ry Description 2303-01-07 ~ ~ Field Book. Cheri<pri B.W.S. HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU flit. Ry Description Scale 1" = 1 ' Approved B.W.S. SHEETS D.tp By Dpeription PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO Cover.DWG 9-11-07 JLM @ 1:15PAM 1 - CE SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, 0 441 ..EN' TOWINISHIP 5 NORTH, RAINGE 73 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, 0 1 $ 5 of 1 COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. < Lid (1 I I 0- 00< , i:Â· r ~961** 'f .1111 ~i:4-r':. --. 34-1,/Ii X-X-X-x-X- R: x- 1 911 SP k T . ., j U J . 1, -33=,=-_4300 - --~~Z~ - :11;EM. 4!NUM 4* 1 J 94 + 1 A -- 1.4,4,1 Â»1 : \- <Â«/7\\\ 1 r it, â€ž --- D N \1 N ----/-1 .i. D q'lAi U 8'*8' SHED , ' p../ D dIHO---_- --0/--- L 1 /*: m. Li ' -------- - 0,-831~PrcuLVERIN ~ -823 U- ----_Lorj=011- _-_ -tr~i~----9 C Â«422;'/f . 04~ . 1......... 0 LLJ --' I -- ~ ' ELEVATIONS FOR THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE STATE HIGHWAY IZ RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT STAMPED "STA 215+56", "EL 8218.75", LOCATED NEAR THE \ -1/ , i / SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE PROJECT ELEVATION OF SAID .---*.i-.- , L ird 8, MONUMENT IS 8218.75 FEET. 1- 6 ------7-7-7~7 / / / X Dy CD , 11 L ni-41- + 9 0 3<1~ /~.., T-3-L Â·4'~ t~ti , Â·Â»14 / / /G~'.J>Â¢- -/ .- --h % . ---- -1 \ \1/ //1/ 1\\* 2%\ 1 . k 'ATINS - 1,1 111111 . 1 \ / Â·Â· . Alitg ~,~ 61 1 1 %. 4 , ... \' 1.-1.1 1,) 91[ I IAS AN AVERAGE SI.OPF OF 1 1 8% / 11.1.6.1...1,1 0 - /7nC--077 (n/A) vv-1 /nne / \ r 1 I. . F- 0 I . .la , ; 0 ... 0 , :-, .. It 0'4, 0,4, A 0 -. 29% 04,\Bm *M#: 1 - C I 46 V ' 4 >0,4.. 154* 2 <:> 0\11,%- %141&2 : 2 . *,Ae . . . 5 ..... 3 V .. . = 0 . . , .- 0 . %~e?y . .. 0, 0 , 4 . 4 . 7R m. .0 - 0- 0 0 0 .0 3 1 1,6,00 I. 4% 045 -9,!120 :: E4*.. emt. I 4 + , 4*##*- 4Ii 9 .. . ... - .- -A .. Â»III# . r 0. .0 . D ... I A e . .1 - . 0. . 0. Â·9,AP . . 0 . 0 0 . E 1 - , 0 1 0. 41*9 - e /6. 0 0 00 0 4 4 *V .: .. . - 0 - 0 â‚¬% . : I S * 2.51 0 . i : I. ...... ... A. - 0 t 1144.. . 1 4%4 0 :94/ . . 0/ p,w,;t . - al .- h . 2, + 404 *'42 .4 94*2 I :, '19 1 .44Â¢F . . . 5 0 1. 2,4 342 - 4 2101/ A'Ub" 4 4%94 4%1;2 94;110 *4 ...4 9,19' 4,1,1,7 . A . 1'1,â‚¬ , -3,4 . A . / 4 . .0 - -0,Â·1Ae . .. - S . A. . . 0 .-0 ........ iÂ¢t,'07 /4/9, - . I. . 1 I . 0.0-.. . . D. . A- ID ..4 6 D k. . *hi I. - I ..... I: 0. D. D. . .. . v I .0 -. .0 , I :1 0 t, 0 4 ' I.*I I *tit ,/ e y 4 0 -;, 0 .3.11./4% â€¢ 0 - . ' le,~ ./- I - ... 04# b 1/.../.1/./.-- ... I. 4 e C . /0~.-/31 , 41*- 4 %110.... Ah:& . 940 . 4 :u.- 4~~ ~ it :M.4, d'~2 &6 / -â‚¬41':* . I -- . 142 . I , %,4 1 ,5.' I - 9.- . 0. 0.-0 . 1 . 0 .. V ' VA . :-4,5 . ...:.. ";,Aw 9 U. . I. 1 -- 4 0 a. I. ....... . . 1 -0 0,11 . - 310'4 ..e*. . .. &4 9,~ . .. ... ,%19 . t. v %4,1,42, . 1 ... . - 0 '* .. : 1 N '.' : 1 . . D .0 4 1.- . I ** 1 ... 0 . : 12 <rd .. . - IDA -. I 4319% - : . . 8 . . '. a . , i -9-0 6 . . Â®:\ dn%- 4 . 6 I.:A , A D- D A '08% .. .. 94* 09 41& , 1. . I.:'... I . . F . . .. 1 . i 2 43 . , 1 ... ... I. *',4& -4 - 0 - ~%*h, 1 W ..A. 0Â¥Pt f. 0> - . 7. 09% - ... 4 7 - . I . 9 1 1 . .. " .... i <Â·22 1.4 4.14 0. 123Â·5'-Â·MK'r:Â·-:Â·Â· Â· 0:'4.Ner>,St,tÂ·f ~9&4*r. . t. 4 / 922 - *,0. 1 O 2 E . A 04 40 - I 64 Lk 14'y TOPOCRAPHIC -1 1 SITUATED lEi THE NORTHWEST ONIE-QUARTER OF SECTION 16, n TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, A <C L.LJ COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO. CM I 0 0 r MY / \ \41 V . I.\ ----- \-2-1Â« Â«Â«~9-Â«Ar.3 - -~ - z~zi-~ ~-In 11 1 1 p- -:- - \ \ A/% ~ 0rn , 11 -- 61 Â»Z ] :C]BAOHIddV o ' '- --1 --' ' 44Â· ~ 3 11 1 -- / 70Â¢ -9 7 7. (Ol. 6 ) XVJ LOOW--9ZZ (0/6) 0==:- 1 t - ..1 : . -4 :W - 4, 47:> , - - 2,1,/4 . .. % 1 e ~2 0 2.0 - . 6 k 4 4 4 y,% b *. Â® \ 8 2. 61 .0, i 20* Am. . /% : : -1344: 441/ 0 4/ . 0 . . A A . . . , ... lei'. Wi . S ' : . 0 I . I , 0,41*4 :44 Â¥ V . . .. . . . 0 1 0 - . ... . 0. - 0 . . 0 . I . . . . . . . .. - 0 . .D . .. ... t 0 .. . .1 . 0. ~At- 4 1. 0 . 0, :. . . .. 6 W,1 f, - . 1 . I .0 1%./ 0. D I - 0 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . Â·Â·f, Â·Â·. *tÂ· - 4/ . .9 I . 0 . : 0 0 - . 0 ..... Â®BAÂ« ... 4%. 0 . 0 4 ~ 0:: sy;,1-, .. ... . .- 0. I . A Â»142 ., thle I . 1, 0 ..... 0. .. . 0- 9 D. . 0 0.-'ll "0 -: I . - 6 0 ... . D . ...1 D 1 - 0 1= .- . - 1. . 0 , 2 0 . 0 -0 . . A-4 4 .. . . 0 0 Nal . . - -. . . .. . 1 ... 0 . 0 1 -0 .. . . 1 . , -:.- . 0 1 1 0 . : - I . t. 1 I. . 0% m . 0 .... . 0 . .. 4 . 9 0,1 0 .0 0/ 0 :S 0 0 - e . --IN /14#/ 5 5 291\V - e . 1 . .0 4,0 - . 0'* . 4 .. 0 6 . 8 4 .1 .. - C :: ti . - e.. .. . - 1. . 4 0, ..L -- . 4 0 1 . . . A : . 1 . .A . . D . :.. , I .. ... 1 1 , 40,4 ' 0 W I . 0 -0 - I . 1, ... A D ?. 1. . .... I. . , . A 0 . e .. - . A :'- D . , 4 I I * DA . . A. 1 .. 4 A . .,0, â€ž 4 0 IDA ..AD . e D . .... . i 1. .D ... A '4 I I. 4 r.'-Â· .Â·uj'(#!It' .49.A;'99*rfit '4'f ~~ ~*,2.>J 5 , . ... . 4 . .... . ... -. . - = 1. 0 . 0 0 .... . .. U . .--0 : . - ... .0 1 ... h' ''1 1 0. 0 : 0. & yL RETAINING WALLS AND DRAINAGE GRADES PER ENGINEERED GRADING PLAN ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK GREASE INTERCEPTOR FOUND %' IRON PIPE, HELD LOCATION As THE NW CORNER OF SIZED 1,500 GALLONS A/C UNIT HEADQUARTERS AND ADMINISTRAMON OFFICE THE Sh NÂ¥04 OF SECTION 16. Tyl. R73W (NJfs CORNER). SCREENED (970) 586-1399 FOUND ACCESSORIES AS REFERENCED ON THE 1978 FROM VIEW ~ ~T~NBE~2/W IM~SP-~'LEGAL DESCRIPION. A ~ FouND 2- .0â€ž pip I CONCRETE WITH BRASS TAG, LS 4845. ~(4)NO TRESSPASSING SIGNS N 8~'~H~ E 784~7~1~0' (M) 42.50' 40.00' - --M.-.-- . --- GAS ME R SIZED ~ (3) MOO GAL. CISTERNS BY XCEL ENERGY LOADING ZONE RETAINING WALLS, NOTE 9 r ,â‚¬v, ENCLOSED AND PROTECTED LVERT -- FUTURE DUMPSTER LOCATION NOTE: 1,500 GPM DIESEL DRIVE ~ FIRE PUMP TO FH, LOCATED IN A 1 1 -- L * 400AMP .S' 3.- e NEW TRANSFORMER LIGHTED, HEATED BLDG W/ FLOOR GRAPHIC SCALE -. 313 8 & ~~EM OVE F k SERVICE 4>.32 (31 BOX (100 KVA) DRAINS. 1. / - 1 -4, SLAB EL = 8303.33 1 / ~ OUTDOOR 1 11 T.O.W. = 8306.33 .F, = 8306.33 84 PANEL .~im 0 25 50 100 1 \ TERMINATION OF ELECTRIC LAB ON GRADE SLAB ON GRADE 1 1 WEDDING / / ~ ... .,~ ~ ';~ FIRE WATER TANK 45,000 AL PRIMARY, GAS SERVICE AND 1 inch = 50 ft. 4 / , 4 " A/C UNIT 29' X 29' X 10'DEEP SEWER LINE. 1 . N V\ AREA li l SCREENED . 0 4 140 TO BE REMOVED -1-- , 0% 1 -1 1 4 FR VIEW 0 A. le ap O \ I 1 1 1 1 --1 \\ 1 .1 0 - 0 5 9 LEGEND: k L ' - 2.\ \ / e 0 IM- -9 3 \ A Fole i Â® INDICATES FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED HEREON , ON a / DOWNSPOUT 0 INDICATES A SET NO. 4 REBAR WITH CAP, PLS 25372 '0-- A-- XÂ· X- (TYP) E. * INDICATES FOUND ALIQUOT CORNER MONUMENT AS NOTED HEREON 5 A y A 1 ...... - 0 - e B /â€ž-/i -* 4 U , NK. .3 '-9 " P CULVERT Â® INDICATES WATER WELL 1 -/il A - %6: I A 1 0 0 0 INDICATES UTILITY POLE 4078\ - - 111 M. 1, ---- , 9 MICHAEL L AND JANE A. SANEM H2~ INDICATES WATER SERVICE 41- - 1,&8 - 2 \PLAVE~SARY /11 \ 4.X\.~ O INDICATES ELECTRIC SERVICE e ARE 2' DEEP IN A . -hÂ» 1 3355 FALL RIVER ROAD - I \ CONDUIT. / /f 1,49 \L.. ,Â¥80~86~.~_00 3691113>;------~Â· ~ / Bl zE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 ~ INDICATES ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ~~ TO BE REMOVED RECEPnav Na 920,2774 ~ INDICATES CABLE TV PEDESTAL 4.72 7\ 6\ ./*le./1 <,f #-- 5 #45 3, '' : 1 424~ 3 i f (M) INDICATES MEASURED BEARING/DISTANCE BY RJL LAND SURVEY PLAT - Nb ,- -- - 54,1.: 0 , A h 9)- / . lt. f Â£2<ZA> / 5 \ /9 Â«U e*Â«Â»4.2---77Â»--- . - <46' 44 (R) INDICATES BEARING/DISTANCE FROM PROVIDED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Z 1 (Rl) HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS, PROJECT F 9(10), REVISED 10/23/1947. 1 ~~\22-'%%.1Â£1%&72(JIT-2-2 -7 - ----Â£( U' - - 9-7.C--aFO 21 Fnk~:,>-v 1 j . INDICATES BEARING/DISTANCE FROM COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _~-----NEW-SEGMEPHASE,./'~ri .2f /.7-074":r-E-~~~ r,/7-1-5-,3 Â¢1 1,~*p j 4 9 /' 1/ /1/ 49 INDICATES BEARING/DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 1 / E SERVICE FOR EXISTING 1 0 02) OF CDOT PROJECT F 9(10) - - -rEMARL 1 _ P---~E-r7--E=--Â·--F~1// CABINS, MOTEL, \ e \4 0 81 ' 11 5 1 0---1 -- --97-1.Eu.-- OFFICE & ESTES PERK 6 1 4 STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTS: , .. 111 11 ~ MASTER METER, NEW- - --1 , I.â‚¬~0> 1--1---i-- 4 44 Â¥ FIRE HYDRANT TRAI~SFORMER BOX ~ *04YPS... ~"o--E- L \ L -- ELECT . \ 0 0 ~100 ~VA) 7.7 (2) 20OAMP . 1% 0# 111 h * EXISTING TREES (8"04-) /// 4 ... 7. f SERVICE PANELS ,4 \ 1 1 40 21. i lei , 1 - --- rn m 6 \ N / .'berÂ» 4/0~3~ 111 11 8 3 * ./CM 'taT 66 9, S. e Nom . 3 NOTES: 31,0/PA 5/ 1 -- / 4/4 --1 1% 1. CONDUIT FOR (FUTURE) THREE PHASE PRIMARY ELECTRIC SERVICE Wk ... f - p f .. ...\\ T / 111 11\ 1 / 00 9 L , i CONDUIT IN ELECTRIC TRENCH FOR CABLE AND PHONE LINES \\ . ''. 5 // 46~.*<N e \ \ NOTE 10 CONDUIT FOR FUTURE DOMESTIC WATER LINE Sm \ \\ 4 \ 6 8"SEWER SERVICE WITH 8"CLEAN OUTS .St. \ < 4 + \ 3 0 1 - /.mr. \ P RMNP POWER POLE // A â‚¬4 2 / / /\ - 1 \< WATER GAS LINE TO BE SIZED BY XCEL UALITY ve i RMNP \NELL \ \ 1.1 8, 3 AREA 2. EXISTING COFFEE HOUSE PARKING 0\-1' 9-\V s \ 6 POND \ \ r k, / / RMNP FIRE HYDRANT ~ 5 - f \\\ ind \ \ 4/ 4 / 'NAEXIST.E J~~ ),11 1 OP / // 4. EXISTING ESTES PERK COFFEE HOUSE R \1 1 2* 1//4 \086 \ )1 . CUP CULVERT \ 3. EXISTING ASPHALT MOTEL PARKING 3 di Rd & 1 W/li 0 0 20'94Â£ PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT 19*f ~ ~38 ~21--- 4 \ \ /524/18Â¢ 13&13 /0// * -u/,971.N~~~ mkw" 6 NOTE 6 -e fee 1 A \ 5. HANDICAP PARKING ~4?lit 1514 4 5 Lt,47, - 7----- 4 ~7 6. WEDDING PARKING 2 CD 00 '9 N // /in -- 1 1 ,Â· EXISTING GRA 1 1 - . . 8% / v~L ROAD TO. REMAINÂ· 4 Â· Â·Â· / ---- -gw TRANSFORMER BOX 7. B&B PARKING COLORADO TE HIGHWAY LVEIT / SEE NOTE 1 / (15 KVA) \\> 4\ 4 SPEED UMIT 25 4%4.1>-~ 21= -1-- 1 / <GREASE INTERCEPTOR ~S\ZED 1.500 GALL~3 - ---.-- ~1 ~ d 8. STREET PARKING LOT LIGHTS: . 34 .1@ -, -/ 1 12' TALL POST LIGHT 1 -1 f \Â»â‚¬04.9 1,SA, -2-___ 2- Â· Â· , ~.1, Â· - I (SHIELDED AND DIRECTED DOWN) y LIGHT DARK SKY COMPLIANT -6-- - '~Â·NOTEÂ·3 1*t- 7/ .... Â· Â·.Â·.Â·.Â· EXIST, ASPHALT 014 1. 47 .EST. IN . -I.--U 11 1 1 f I (40 + 61:79, 6", U -1 - 1 f% 4,J / / \ --:i" 1 11 EXIST. SEWER \ MANHOLE 0. Â·~ NOTE 4% fl -d UCTARY -~T- -iN / 1 - \ r. 9. RETAINING WALL WILL CONSIST OF A PRODUCT CALLED "ANCHOR R=11410.00' 64, e.rf;4.: 1 REMOVE FENCE / 31:6 ' -- ./ 47 .-/ __ __ __ WATER ~- ~- ~ - \1 / 11 1-- - - ' 2 N 09.---\ 1/ 11 X ..-X - X ~ 4 9, - i \ HIGHLAND STONE" DISTRIBUTED BY "PAVESTONE". THE RETAINING LION-POTABLA J WALL WILL BE ENGINEERED ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN <EL N6739'7~.Â£~603 12' - - - REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE - ~ * 60303' i - .-- RETAINING WALL PRODUCT, AND ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN 11 n - RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO \\ -- -O, CU T 0Â» 6 EXISL SEWER - EXIST. 15' UTILITY EASEMENT INSTALLATION. 01. MANHOLE ~ BOOK 1573 AT PAGE .684 \\ 9 \ \\ 0 --> / 4/ M - - - 10. OUTLET STRUCTURE SEE DETAIL SHEET 9 3. 82 - 'EXISTING-- AOTE 2 0 10.42 - \ \ 41 Z Â§ .53 1 0 \ - - -cfr, - .11Â¤ w -- ..... -M 4 l FOUND r IRON PIPE WTH * BRASS TAG, LS 4845 - -0. - N 7552' 09 .46/ *a~2iw 4 \ 9/ 622 * ALL OVERHEAD POWER IS TO BE COZ 00 42;~Â·03' \ REPLACED WITH UNDERGROUND. 4 Â® - EXTERIOR LIGHTING: 2990 0443 l.34*Â·~ / 044 DELLA TERRA SIGN~~ STEWART HH< INC - . EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING ...2 t (SHIELDED AND DIRECTED DOWN) 4>/Â®,r op 2244 Large stone 3 MIRADA ROAD ~ 1/2 LIGHT DARK SKY COMPLIANT .1112- dark engraving COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 -ER HIGHWAY NOT TO EXCEED 15' IN HEI GHT FROM ORIGINAL GRADE ~X. - ~ (DorÂ· 6 -OUND 2- IRON eME r- FOUND 7 IRON PIPE WITH SOLAR LANDSCAPE AND GROUNDS LIGHTING L~Â»oj -34 ~ \ - * -40(a. N BRASS TAG. LS 4845. 1/2 LIGHT DARK SKY COMPLIANT -/*. .<\4 -040 . + 90009 (SHIELDED AND DIRECTED DOWN) --4 -- SOLAR ROAD AND PATHWAY LIGHTING 3#*N 1/2 LIGHT DARK SKY COMPLIANT ~*~ ~ ~ 1 (SHIELDED AND DIRECTED DOWN) -OP.Aer. ~ <222~44. 8 ALL EGRESS, STAIR AND HANDICAP LIGHTING -% / U TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS ~ \\/ 0.- 2 ROCKY MOUNTA/N GAmM/Ar P.U.D. PHASE / PARCELÂ·I )--* COOT PRAECT F-9 (10) CURRENT SINGLE PHASE PRIMARY ELECTRIC TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND FROM 0,Â©0/6 ELECTRIC POLE AT CENTER OF WEST PROPERTY LINE TO NEW PRIMARY PEDESTAL BEHIND -- - 06#540., #*44 EXISTING SHOP BUILDING. TWENTY FOOT EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED FOR UNDERGROUND ** - -'**r*.9 3 - PRIMARY. PRIMARY ELECTRIC TO BE INSTALLED FROM NEW PEDESTAL TO PROPOSED 1 .- -- \\\ 7~*p 4 - 2,4 -i \ le/ BUILDING. PRIMARY ELECTRIC TO BE INSTALLED TO NEIGHBOR ON THE EAST. EASEMENT - C:,4,00. .8/ Ame.4,41 IF THREE PHASE PRIMARY ELECTRIC IS ELECTED BY OWNER AND FEASIBLE, [T WILL TO BE GRANTED FOR PRIMARY ELECTRIC TO NEIGHBOR. ,%1 /6 \ -I -~ 'RIGHT LANE NMUST TURN 49, BE PROVIDED FROM POWER SOURCE AT RIVER, NORTH TO HWY 34, BORE UNDER 40MPH SI 1 4\ N x)257~~j ~GN ~~~ = 47., 0/&.4~ -2~< 11(Â» Sle 1-- . HWY (PERMIT TO BE OBTAINED), AND CONTINUE IN UTILITY EASEMENT TO PROPOSED BUILDING SITE. SIGN --. CLIN>. \ 33. \ 1 PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. REVISIONS Date SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 Drawn D.M.C. CLIENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEETS put, By De'rriptinn Field Book Checked B.W.S. HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 ~ ~ Oltp By nesrriptinn NO. OF 12, By Dpwription Scale______1'"=50'--~ Approved _B.W.S. PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO SITE-PLAN.DWG ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK HEADQUARTERS AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE Â·* .. v#Y- X- N 0012'00~ W 46&96' (R) 9-11-07 Uk 0 01:15PM ~ ~ 1031 - I (2) NEW WATER RISERS GREASE INTERCEPTOR f- FOR LANDSCAPE â€¢ SIZED 1,500 GALLONS (4)NO TRESSPASSING SIGNS N 88Â·04'GOÂ» E 784.157 (R) ~ ----= - --- 1.L- . 1 4--** -CL 0 4 RETAINING WALLS LOADING ZONE d Jlk, 4 4 4 I ./ 2, 4 a ENCLOSED AND PROTECTED ed. 11.- - - DUMPSTER LOCATION ~ e 1.0 / SLAB EL = 8303.33 1 2~ + 1/< 1 1 F.F. = 8306.33 LO.W. = 8306.33 | ' T &1 AREMOVE 1 ..,11 1 1 / / 6 1 \\ // E C...\ - o 1 i \ 1 1 ..\ 4 .0 -- 0 k - 00'.*9 1 1 .\ 1 9 - 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 6 k .' f. A , le - ---- /./ \i -0.4 5~ 100 0 L- // .. /4 ' '' zt ..-*M-* r.-x- CO-X- 1 -1-- ---I --- 1 inch = 50 ft. -- x * 1 /\- 1 >.4,4 .O 0 0 Nk~ 1---011------ - - --J /.0 e .O ' /20 .1* e 111 lk/ liwy (3 MICHAEL L. AND JANE A. SANEM /-32 / 3355 FALL RIVER ROAD / L / 0 - Fr .0 i - / Â·Â· RICK ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LEGEND: , .O 41 4.:72 , 1 5 1 \ \\ TO BE REMOVED RECEPnON NO. 92012774 ...24 '' HOWER HOUSE A / 1//- ! 7 44 Z \0\\ A / O ur g \ ~ SHRUB te f 7/ -r b 1-_t 3-- // h../#\ 433 0 f \4 40. ~1 + r- - -t.fl-- 3 \ g POTENTILLA "JACKMAN" ... 4- HEIGI-IT 3-4' \ ' COLOR-YELLOW _---5-P# 1---7-5-f-fr -- -4 11 11 , 1 -- -h\\ / /LE . SHROB 40.r. - ep, \ BUDD, "ROYAL RED" (BUTTERFLY BUSH) 9 -- 1-r-- 9 40~ / 4 0 HEIGHT 4-6' It' 11 111 11 ill li f \\ 't, 4.1 --E.H. \ 35> \N 4 COLOR-RED 1 1 , h\ \ \ 7 APEr ...7 - \ 0 1 67 - 8- 11Â£ NATIVE GRASSES .- 6 \ 111. 11 \ ~~ ~ ~- ff*~ q,414 * ~ / // '0 ~ 4 . i ----- VÂ»4 \I S 1 -, \~ /2 111 11\ L\ J .O \ 1 d \\ .* * EXISTING TREES, (SEE GENERAL NOTE 2) , le k 1 0 % ..1/ A M!~00 ft'UN!2 e \ - 40 1-, QUAUTY f / 30\ / (7 EXISTING WATER RISERS FOR MAINTENANCE/LANDSCAPING WATER 5 \ \\ POND \\ \ 1 .l \ 14. Z // -1\ 4 AREA b 'N..1â€¢v-EX/ST.-E-Ar y' d'/ 1 -O op / 4 ; 1 GENERAL NOTES: i .4 1 2* 0 1 -h. 4044Â£1 91 MT Ill 11 0?4 1. This site is a mountain property with mature trees, shrubs and natural mountain '0 4 Ld 1 -4 8/0,1 7, A -*- \ i,/ Lalll jl r:Ar u ~ I ff grasses and plants . Existing plant materials meet or exceed normal Landscape 1 MIW-* 1'1.11 + - 0 1 requirements. Additionallandscaping will beprovided the generalarea ofthe new r.Â£. 0 0 .0% 111 11 4 -4--7 Wfit I'l It C *% 1 building structure only. 1 1 , - 4 . 3 -'-- **% \ Nor. - * / 2. The trees noted on this plan are existing mature trees with a minimum eight inch (8") \ \ diameter. The trees shown do not necessarily reflect all existing mature trees. The trees COLORADO - rLY . 1 -CIan / - / 347~4140, -0 \ 1 -/ - / shown were located during survey operations r, 1 NQ ir F -- AIii . | 3. See erosion control notes on sheet 3 of 6. - 1 -1 1 .1 ...?.6.- 4 9 - #-11 - ---il---/ 1 . \ t-41 4 -1- 0, 14>eÂ».1.50'. - - ----- 1 ' < 4. Disturbed areas to be seeded (Mountain Mix) EXIST. ASPHALT ' Â£ ST. IN \ $ - - .5**J | 1 4 IL 4 N X NIN N 61>29>J. * 602 \ 5 -. Cy'f 5.V~Y E NEW 8Â»PVC .O \/ te:.I .\ 5. Vacated campsites are to be reseeded per note 4 above. 1 4 ---- 0 - ----- - r - \ \ - 6. Automatic sprilikles shall be installed behind the bed and breakfast along the retaining walls. - 11( \ p .1 11 - - 1-rn,M:7 /1 - 69 111-L - - - \\ 9 - +_--_-_..1-221-->u-3-LJ--1,- il 47 i - C k \ i Â§ 044 5 -_ -__----0- - *. 7. Trees/shrubs shall be guyed and fenced to protect from wildlife and maintained by Owners. -- 31Â» \ I a \ O. 292 1 -\ 4 r - y N 7530'JO* 1 1 \\\ Ek,Â°"-k#*4 ~~ p .,â€¢ ~.~~, \ - / 4 rv e -- W cup l.0%*x / 0 DELLA TERRA SIGN- COLORADO '?Zoy (100Â· 5 Large stone j 1 .- 0,0874 37Â»Â£, - dark engraving 4~1>, ~ . -I 4' X 5' STONE HIGHWAY 007 m CANS- Ab 3 -~ \04â€ž * + 9005) Â»â‚¬0* \ -- \3# --- - \0- â„¢2Â»~2~ ) i k -I-\\\ re: 4 --- 1 Â§ z 44%242 -- ----1- ---- --0-7-- - , 2/ \Â« 4/ toup 'ANCE I REVISIONS Date_EPIEMBER 11. 2007 Drawn C.S.P. CUENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO. PROJECT NO. NO. OF Ditp Ry Dpirriptinn Field Book _ HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU Checked B.W.S. 2303-01-07 Dr,t. Scale- Approved B.W.S. SHEETS Description 1"=50' DRIP By Description PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO LANDSCAPE-PLAN.DWG 3 N 0012'0Â« W 46&96 d330 : FUTURE WATER 9-11-07 JLM 0 1:15PM fr . -. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK ~ ~~R~FÂ·IF~gE ~EAw~L&12137 17 YNE, NW <Bldh HEADQUARTERS AND ADMINISTR OFFICE LEGEND R73W (N>ia CORNER). FOUND ACCESSORIES AS REFERENCED ON THE (970) 586-139@T 1978 MONUMENT RECORD OF THIS CORNER, -I---.I- - -*.--- ..g. EXISTING 1' CONTOUR POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PROVIDED LEGAL - (4)NO /22\- <0.36|0.28 -- EXISTING 5' CONTOUR FOUND 2Â» IRON PIPE DESCRIPnON. x 5NS ~ 784.15'f/-- *2310~*-1 --. .4.e * IN CONCRETE WITH - \ 10.54/ -4971 - PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR BRASSTAG, LS 4845. -2-~-Ix--X--x--1--IL--r---'-210,10Io,31 1*BlbT--8370(6)- - ----4970-- PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR . ./.* ** - - -.- -I -7 - - 10.53/ 1 C Ble 46-2-------. ----:----2267 zi:--. 43,36 . i VEHICLE mACKING CONTROL PAD h N GRAPHIC SCALE ... Â»,p~ERT ,% (0.36 10.32 1 8 -- --- A---- ---.---- .--- --* -\ 0.53,/ - 1 - - aâ„¢Joi- ... ... ~4 ,. 50 ~26 |0.32 j 8334 ..3 \ \ .N~- . 4 4132 * f<- \ \ 8 A 2.20- P.9 -- - --- -- 6-WI~~'--25~ CÂ© FOREBAY 50 100 1 /- '.1., ... . 3. D h. Â·Â·" .920- . ' h., *.- le --- -- ~- ' .. ..-- -P I.~ . r' --6--7 --- 1 - 1 9 11 -- -211 .00 ~ ..a.M# I 1--7 . I B=# O ROCK DUKE 1 inch = 50 fL - 1 ... 9. t . 1 , I : / .,aw SUB ON GRADE. 1 1,~- ,2 - 2 Â·--Â· t--%~-----'- :.. .....8304.- -1- 1 - 007'DOOR ~ i.. I l h A 6Â«\16.0\11 22 NEDDING --. .... 1 1 - \ m //\\ ./ 8296. - 1 A -BASIN DESIGNATtON ' 11 \ --. -N | B =AREA IN IRES 1 k. EFACIENTS - f B ~(10 / c . %8Wp~SITE RUNOFF \.:<< 1, C . 1 , .7\ vÂ·~t;--f/- -AF***c*~ - -tiNE>. 27Â»2224 , -*~.Â· i ll--1 A -f ke'.4 5 - < 4 --. .- A 8302 -.4-/ Ble . 9 0_ Cio =00 YR. EVENT) k Ctoo.(100 YR EVENI) /-\.0-2\ 0- 1 1.-4Â·Â·~~-/ #- -- 4 ', 1-9.10 ..i :--j#-*3< -- f/Al f . D = DESIGN POINT DESIGNATION . _- ~-1 \ - -/ -# --- ---0 v , 4. A i ->4 / -20 - - 41 'Â·. - . :. 4 . ~-Â·Â· PROPOSED STORM SEWER + SIU FENCE C -- / Fll>-w-*--am TE~ 313*x-~ -* '- 4 K,al#*#flb, i -1 -- . - 2 40' / 4 3-- -~ ~ 1 1 *tic f--*- ---- -7 11/\ .- // /1- - /<67=44~ *0.52 |0.34~Â·>-JA-1 - 0.%>. 2/3 X-=e-.-:2612.1- i ~' ~* /4 . 79'M - -----7-2- >0 - --11.~ - ' rs. aigl,ILM- |03>f{.. 7Â·1 14.9.J.4 + 40 N .-% h.-~ .. '*3â€ž -.4.m -- AG.- / EXISTNG GRAVEL AREAS Â·Â· \ -. - rÂ£ â€¢-A- L i - eos'25 r- 8226 ./ I. p .Â· 1#/ gedE. *.--- 1/ . - 4 4 8294 + - 07,0/ --B ... 42 -.kir, 15;04- :-iv< 8292 . 440 -9.---:.0 1 Lift..3 -2 N - ~~- 5290 1 107 74\,g@kR HOUSE ._- I / 3 / \ . ...-&... \4/ 0/ / %..I Â£\ - Â· TGOEBERIFUEUDVED - ..88 U -- .-,- .i. / h- -i\ \\ 0-6 11- - 1- .1 Ik .%4 1'. 1 6 Â»4- 2 44/ ----* - 2- - _8284 -- - .... - 8200 .. -4/, c B 2 k *0 .51 _ 8Â« 1- ...'. rM.- 6\ a.37 3 \< ft â‚¬'.i: jore.-Â·.4 . 8, , --1 . I %4- - - 15 -Â· .-"- 7- -- --191 -.4 / '11 / / --1- I-*i ill- -199Â·\\ /~2.04 10.347 Y \ Â·Â·-Â· -- . Â·~ 8278 r ' 4 4:QI.fÂ° M / L- \ Â·,1 . A T r# \ V ,A -- e '276 41 1 :.4- 0.55 + T./.,ID 0 1 8276 1, LJ .9 r - 1 - + , 'I -% \\ 4'llf< }Ar \ ... \It~LIC. 41:3.212 ~02, / - r--42 h 77 \ 429.4, 0 1 i -- Ill - #1 f 41 2 / / \ -Wt r P XeeÂ· I i - I .. 0 ~ - Â·. ,.. Â· I / / . 1 ~10\<-1 -\4 r:MI .4tr.. \. 4\: t# *. /2 1 p . 8~CMP CULVERT - â€ž~ , 42 =MS -k / - 3 A HY 4 7 \ 4 *1 i. k . El . ,/. -* \ h ---- ----. .- 44 4,Â·* h - . â‚¬ . 1. --- /. r 7 \ 'r ". 1 1 ------ - -~%i-*/% - -7 :/ - .1 \ 4 \ .1 \ /- .----- 4 - I ' j It j.-' At f A * U43 f." ~\..i f .- --- *I' //1,/ -7 - Â·I ~RMNP POWER POLE (BBaÂ» 1 A 7-,- \ 0 1\\ \-4. -1 1 ..0 - ./. t\. \, RMNP-WELLI --- - -- , RMNP FIRE HYDRANT - 1 1 . \ ...tr . .- ~ .. -1.-- ..... /- 4 ../.- -- -. , 64 \ Â». \ 'i- 1 -u, n 1 6.1 -. 02 ~6.31 ~0.33 1 3 2/ 9 0.55/ \\>// 92vâ€¢/4. V -1- -\1.04 |0.33 h 1,</r w â€¢40 16 \ 00 ~ ~- i. ~/ ~ ' F-8~ CMP CUINERT ~ u., :) 1} , STAMPED STA: 215+56, EL 8218.75, HELD \., - 14 '.- / - -- 1 4- - 4 10.9 \ * -Â·#S-Â·Â·e .i,_.,-y.~-Â·~=y-#.9/* 440 .-1//Pu--/1.4,/.Â·. 'A FOUND STATE HIGHWAY R.O.W. MARKER, -- --- \ 1% 4,/ ~ LOCABON ON â„¢E NORâ„¢ERLY - ~' --- 11 7 " 0242 2% RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO HWY 34, , --- - 1 7 . I ..,- - . /r. 572 -17 - 1 j M ...,- I.-.9.- * ... . . 0 - Mt\\ 1.. 101\ \klOWEVER MONUMENT IS 1.25' WEST OF i // / /14- - .- , \ Â£ i. f ,- .,11 - 82.0 - 4 9'. . 4 SECHOa LINE - (R. O.W. PLANS SHOW THIS . \./ , -. r, 4 70 - 8230 I , s..4 5 / -I MONUMENT QN SECTION LINO. RAW. ti ' ii \. 3 - -7> MARKER IS 128:05'39'W 1.36' FROM , / , 1\-. xl CORNER. \ . ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ -~< ~~C- â€¢4, ' i 4 \\. / - \ /53 , 344 .\ . I.- ..Â· GRAVEL ROAD 1 1 / Â· Â· ~ Â·Â·~ NEW TRAN~ORMA Box (15 1(VA) 'Â·, ~. ~ r> ' 0- 0 /0/ 1 . * I / 1 ' 7.1 /0 ~ 8' CMP b.VERT 1 hblk 'li . NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE ---1- ......... 1 1 4 '. -- 1----Â·- m ./.~:... 82- Â·Â· ~ -9: ~ ' ~' -- - I /0 /1 4. X ~ ----- COLORADO STATE H]GHWAY NO. 34 -/.C I ,/.''N, 1. \.41' h 1/4 4 - ~-42--- - . ' 1 .......~- %\\ 4\ 9 22=.7 - EXIST' PARKING ' E)(IST. AINALT .- . - 7-1-/ -â€žÂ» . %.U ,/.---\.1.-hug i \% 1 \ \A --- 1 ./85 1 (M) 1 \\ L 73 4- N 6r39'13- W 602.45' (R) MANHOLE 1 111 - 3.\ 'N \1 9 t J-EXIST. SEWER ~ --<84bj~- - R-11410. ~. \~.~~ ~~ Â· : 1 1 ~ ~ \1.25|0.30 ; I 04 .Ry 4,0-1. kl / -. \. \ ~ ~"~~~ ~~ LLUE_-~:i~ .t/ i 10.53/ c --\ 0.7110.30 / 10.54.X. 1 / *- 1 V' ----- %-x- 8210 --- ----- / CH-N67Â·39'18*W 603.0 1 ~ ~ ~ ... _- i*Tri ,\ 1, L-603.1 -- .----â€ž 0.55A ..... WATER "'-Â·Â·- - I - 1 - X .2 \ N. N \.50-77=--- - - - 40.20 ~0.34 LNCI-POTABLE - -. - --- ...0700- \ ~ ~ 703Wr--1-Za .7 - EX Bt~CUP CULE~~ /~//~ 4 / x - , 1 1.1.1 1 All. --- *--W- - -- D-03'01'4 - --- _.--Â·Â·Â·Â·-- - 8200 _,,0/>2- - ~Â»-Â·Â·-2. --4-Â·--1 ~ '-~, 4, \ . . 14) - - r \ -**0*# 1ILIILI.L.lill. i 9 . 1> / - 21 . '341 2, /b 1-/ / N 7530 JO- W / - g 344 4 Ub OF AspH,IT 389.23' (R) - ///1 16. ...1 FOUND 2" IRON PIPE -- Â® 9 wn'H BRASS TAG, LS N 75Â·5224- W 389.or (M) % 4845. Q 0 - - .SIGN.~, .-/ 0--/ 000.2942, 6 , ErhkAt-4233 //05\ ' \ #01 1 - 819 - - 9.142:14' -L ; Lf?Â» 1 -4 - \ - *404** + 1 > ---n_~ BSc _ - STEWARL HW, INC /2 n.%0 \ i / /.-r.*Â£!f / / T\..1.. %10'0\ 31.-/ .4 1 0.47 2% ON _~ 3 WRADA ROAD -CY 'A .r- / , foUNd' 2- IRON PIPED \ 1 \. \ COLORADO SPRINGS. CO 80906 Â·Â· WITH BRASS TAG, LS $ I./.. - 4845. , ..1 / ty 4 7-7 7 1 ",\ 26/ *... ... 0/ 6 N N. .- /-2 / / / / r. 2.\444>%6 -1- - f/9 \ 1/ 1 --\ , 2. i / 1 ,/ - I \\ ' \. 1 3,3/< g.ir/1-Â«433 ef I. 4.6..30=\\\= :a, 'r I V.. $ COCMÂ· 436 - ROCKY MOUNTAIN GATEWAY P.U,D. PHASE I PIRal r 1 1- CDOT PROICT F-9 (10) / ; 1 / 2Â».... 4Â» / 3 2\KN / 1 -f - /4-1 i 1 4- / 4 - a / 70.9 /O/ f , 7 \ f I ... 1 F 29Â·Â«22-- -4 -1 ~ 1,4471.30~W ~20mr * 642) Existing Condition f ,/3 3,> Â».1.INE '1.--Â¥.-i~,4j f~ ~i 2066.ip, - ~ / 1 - . 4. 22\I./, /'/ \ Design Point Basin(s) Area (acre) % Imp. Clo Cloo Q10 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) .-h ././ ,- 1 1 A Lt Dlf Bla,Blb,Blc,Bld,Ble,Blf,OS-1 7.15 3.44 0.28 0.51 6.8 18.7 ///-, , - 3 AL-- -+ 1 02 Bla,Blb,Blc,Bld,Ble,Blf,B2,OS-l,OS-3 17.79 3.44 0.27 0.51 15.0 43.9 47>/-- /-- D3a B3a,OS-2 29.04 3.62 0.27 0.51 9.3 59.3 ,-Â¥-- . . \..... 4.1 D3b B3b 0.20 18.71 0.44 0.55 0.4 0.8 1 D3c B3c 12.16 10.08 0.30 0.53 17.2 46.7 D4a B4a 1.04 16.27 0.33 0.55 1.4 3.7 D4b B4b 1.75 13.96 0.30 0.53 2.3 2.5 D5 B5,OS-4 129.16 0.08 0.25 0.50 66.1 203.9 - SHEET NO. REVISIONS Dr,te SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 Drawn D.M.C. CLIENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN PROJECT NO. NO. OF SHEETS ritp By Description Field Book - Checked D.M.C. HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 ntp By Description Scole 1 " * Ry Description =50' Approved B.W.S. PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO EXIST-DRAIN.DWG 4 ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK HEADQUARTERS AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE (970) 586-1399 (M).,Â¢09Â» At .00.Zt.00 N 5 16Â·47'36- E 76 (13) I 908 M .11.00 N (A),L, 909 M .00,2 LOO N 9-11 -07 JLM @ 2:45 PM ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK ~ FOUND *" IRON PIPE. HELD LOCATION AS THE NE HEADQUARTERS AND ADMINISTR OFFICE LEGEND CORNER OF THE Sh NWA OF SECnON 16, T5N, RUW (NX, CORNER) 0.52 ms, - - -0- 83.49 BRASS TAG, LS 4845 th (970) 586-1399-~ FOUND ACCESSORIES AS REFERENCED ON THE HI PNT 1978 MONUMENT RECORD OF THIS CORNER Bla Â® 8304 ~3 POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PROVIDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION --- x (4)NO NS _ IN CONCRETE WITH 1 - 0.36 0.28 1- ---- -3-ZE l -FOUND 2" IRON PIPE EXISTING 1' CONTOUR 40 , .Â£ 784. 9 r- k 0.10 0.36 Blb 0. (M) 1 ------ .-- 0.56 - v 8342 0% \ GRAPHIC SCALE - -4970-- - EXISTING 5' CONTOUR 7 -b - ' 1 3-*. . roh OIl- \ - Ble - - RETAINING WAL.bgle- j .. 50 0 25 50 - 100 4971 - PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EX 8" CMP LVE R 0.26 0.35 / - _- _ - ~ GO 434 44 i \ 0.5~ / -1- ./Ii --- 1 PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR 0.36 0.39 1 .- 0.57 1 inch = 50 ft -----------7 - 624, I NEW mAASFORMER * ~ ~ 000 / /// - -- 400AMP SERVICE OOQC 1 - i / '41 - , 1 c C â‚¬ 00 o~oc VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL PAD , - J 119<* PANEL ,) ~j ~ 64~4 'Â». OX (100 KVA) * 1~ . --- 9. I 114 i . --- *-- , '11 j . .0 I i / - . I A- -% - *- .t 00 0000( 00 0002c 4 -- --- 0 N. * .06.--2 1 ff / 0 -2 2-203.1 _ 1. - 0 ON GRA - - -,-mm.L - 6106 Â£ h - -2 2 29' X 29' X 10'DEEP . 1 + SLAB O~RADE 44. 71 , -* 3 - N. / \ FOREBAY 4- la -*=6~1 ~.*/ ---2/- ----- ...â„¢..... - 0 0 000C i . L~-\ ARE UTER ANK 45.000 CAL- 1 \\ /.14\11 \ 44 Ble . - ... 8 9 f 1-4 - Â£ r . % -1-1 .0 'Â®- 0 - ..60 - 60 \ 9 4 tv3oj - - - ---1 - Bl f *40-Â°f --9--- tra. - / --4/ ' .% A /9 ROCK DIKE - .11 11 . ~ - --- 0.15 0.49 ..% 9 / 2 - 1 F -v --* 1 07> --- - - --- \ 15 --- - M ,- / 4 C> n / 0.62 - * 14 --4 -- 827g -- --* -- 0 0.52 0.39 - Ah* -- 4 > 1 0 / % 0.57 , 4,\- Â«13 - - -111-1 - 1-2x * X - 8102 . /Ah A = BASIN DESIGNATION t / 7 W. 1 -- ~ ~Ul.~E~*m~~ 7 / CM CUL â€¢A ' "- 1 - le =h ..,gil) . -- 0 ' 0.. W, -1 020 B = AREAIN ACRES , _0300- A IC A * .... - \I Ic,3/ C = COMPOSITE RUNOFF 0, - .4. .... 1%// 4 /' \\ DU - -O - -- = COEFFICIENTS , 2 -*- % r -%&4- - - ./ il. : Cio =(10 YR EVENT) b 8204 ... u mm....221==â€¢- _ \ 1 - a - - MICHAEL L AND JANE A SANEM C ioo=(100 YR EVENT) . .//4X / A \ /- /905.0 ; YEP, Z a. I -- 3 elli VEL De h>â‚¬ i Â· BRICK - ---Il=- - - -- --1 8202- (1Â¥aÂ¢V #-f- 4 4 \1 1 /~ Tcy~%*;4290 - --- - I 3355 FALL RER ROAD ~ D= DESIGN POINT DESIGNATION 4 #/ . / 0 45% N \ 2 7 , A. L \ '\ - ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 --. . %= -918403174 a .-I __8284 .- - -- -- 22\11-N . \ B 2- RECEPTON Na 92012774 I \ . 0 . . 9 + 1 1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER . i 2 04 0.38 Â° 1 ' 4-\ ~ * . 0.57 - .-- 8278.47 - -- 7 -1 - -21 - 0 4 \ L \\ F _ 07276/.Â£ - SF - SIU FENCE ---- ----4-1-~1-,-'E'--2 3,&~-,MN-FBOX<1KKIA) 8274 n . SF- - 1 8276 \\\ .\\ -, # - -,0 10/ 1 \\ 1 --- - -Â»EÂ»gRWCE FOR kins'l~G CABINS. h k 4 ~ 2272 womCE_& ESTES PERK 4 .\. 1 - . lilli .11-Â· - f \\ -- _--- 'u 47 - (21 200AMP c. i PANELS h --- ./- --/4~/A - JI 4 414 -e Lizy, J -- - - 1 . eâ€¢Â¥..... \ - i V , , ' 44274 / = 48 . / S 9 - J - 890 \ 4 â‚¬MV ~* re I 1 / \ // 1< . Vow Am JA $ - 4.1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN NOTES \ .All -//7/7---J j P CUL RT (REM ,4 5 0 -- - STANDARD EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Â«bâ‚¬ER \ 4. February, 2005 4/K. />'/9 1:/ . .. I ..-fl-- 43. GRAVEL DRIE g Revised November 30, 2006 N h (1 ) The erosion control inspector must be notified at least twentrfour (24) hours / - Cole #.0 \ \ 3- .1 m --cx - 4'. 40 / r- prior lo ony construction on this site \ \\ +1-1 -- \\ .1 th. (2 ) 1here shall be no earth-disturbing activity outside the limits designated on the â‚¬> accepted plans. '~ 60 4 \ \ (3 ) All required perimeter silt and construction fencmmt*bal' be installed RMNP POWER POLE (BBa*, 1 ! \ \1 \\ / / WATER any land disturbing activity (stockpiling, stripping, grading, etc) All other RMNPWELL- - - - \ /1.X /\ - m ~ --3948.2 ~ - . QUAUTY required erosion control measures shall be installed at the appropriate time in p \AP RMNP FIRE HYDRANT / ' # 02 POND the construction sequence as indicated in the approved project schedule, \6 31 |0 35/ - v e 11 \- 4 -\ AREA construction plans, and erosion control report V-.-- 1. ,# tiv k" 2 - 8240 0.59 \/ / .24'' 9. gEnE-t? , 4 h *<2Â»24*~ AB \ - = _ _ 1.04 0.41 52:. 1 (4 ) Al all times during construction, the Developer shall be responsible for -- --- --- - - ~ - ~ EX 8~ C< CULVER \~ ~ FOUND STATE HIGHWAY ROW MARKER, \ 4 - / -- 0.58 E' 1/ preventing and controlling on-site erosion Including keeping the property STAMPED STA 215+56, EL 8218 75, HELD , < '. 1 T .*12- - - "-\-3 __ - - a W daÂ· h /1 0 , ' -23 / 4 L rt - -Â·C#GE.PHAsE) -~~Ex'~ LOCATION ON THE NORIHERLY -1-- 4.\ facilities shown herein \ 20''/4Â¢f:627.-47/r> 3- --- sufficiently watered so as to minimize wind blown sed,ment The Developer shall also be responsible for .stolling and maintaining all eros,on control , -* RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO HWY 34. - , 1 ,<2842$ 4 -' 8242 0 , ' /\ %.-~. 4.: \ J NdOWEVER MONUMENT IS 1 25' WEST OF i 7 0 7 --8240 1 0 / /r., 1 SECTIOa UNE - (ROW PLANS SHOW THIS B .. -- - , Â£ MONUMENT QN SECnON LINE) ROW 3 - 8230 -- . -- -N MARKER IS N*805'39"W 1 36' FROM / / \\\ 50 16 OlD 51 1 1 1 .11 d) 4. # K â„¢.-6. *g //f/F /L \-1 7/ 1 lit. 6 required for immediate construction operations, and for the shortest practical (5 ) Pre-disturbance vegetation shall be protected and retained wherever possible Removal or disturbance of exist,ng vegetation shall be limited to the area(s) \ CORNER \- -0 ~ - period of time 1 \ -- -- - 9- - -- -- .... - /EX GRAVEL ROAD TO RE~AIN (6 ) All solls exposed during land disturbing activity (stripping, grading, utility - 1 1 .... - \ NE)V TRA~FORMER BOX (15 I<VA) , 'r< 1 KL.i-- i 1 --2,Â£- - --- , - --1-t* + - / 40 <-2 41-111 1; \ 1 + 1 40- e , -41 5 2 \ Â£---- - - 05 - --- ~-- / '' /1 Â· ripping or disking along land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other installations, stockpiling, filling, etc ) shall be kept in a roughened condition by 8- c,AWART 4238 ./ \%. / NORT)~RLY RIJUGUNE- -- \ \ ~ J-- - _ â‚¬ + - - 7T--SF 238 SE // / \ permanent erosion control BMPs are Installed No solls In areas outside 2 IX / -- ---- - -*--*- - = 82 'N - ---% -- --0 --- SF- 9, 1/ .\ project street rights-of-way shall remain exposed by land disturbing activity for N COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY NO 34 ) , 4* 7: - 2- 3,/ u 4 0 0 73 o.vt-~ - - 12 * ~ more than thirty (30) days before required temporary or permanent erosion : --- ~7- - _ control (e g. seed/mulch, landscaping, etc ) Is installed, unless otherwise r -- ~tti8220 - -- . - WI- --- M EXIST PARK Nd - , - 1 4 Â·-fr~~2 -3 2 /7 t S-/8410\ . -- -~85Â»~ ~ x EXIST ASPHALT L -- - - *--i----/ -.*I.$ approved by the City of Loveland \ 7,-0 I , - b. N 6739 ~ W 602 45 OR) r. . 6 -2 - 1- 7 / (7) In order to minimize erosion potential, all temporary (structural) erosion control N. 3 <Cri ZI --- _ aâ‚¬ 1. measures shall Â£ -1 -332AR>~ ----- BBb 74,2L-~~I-32: 4-- 4 (a ) Be inspected at a minimum of once every two (2) weeks and after each 4 --- 0.71 0.36 1 ~ li.25 |0.33 ~Â»' 1 significant storm event and repaired or reconstructed as necessary in order to ensure the continued performance of their intended function 40.- -- \ - , --0 -22- - _ *-- 0.56 .0 1 / \ IO.54/ 261Â·2~ ' L-6031 ATER <' . - CH-N6739'18-W 603 -------- ----- - -- 0.20 0.44 \ -porzLE- - ~ + ~ -- 1- F '- , ' ' k\34 ~ are sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control (b ) Remain zn place until such time as al the surrounding disturbed areas 0.60 1 inspector . N-/0 2 -% --\- EX 8" CUP CUL PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT - - N. . \ -p --- -- (c ) Be removed after the site has been sufficiently stabilized as determined A \ \\ - 3b - ./K - ---- _ uu)Ts OF CONSTRUC~OH (rfP>Â·--tr- 0 1 -- --- -h-- - a by the erosion control inspector 0-03'01'4 (DISTURBANCE) - , :.,1 %. / EASEMENT BOOK 1573 (8 ) When temporary erosion control measures are removed, the Developer shall 9 ./ \ 1 \ _ MANHOLE | / AT PAGE 084 4 :.\ E>asT SEWER m '' r-EXIST 15' UnUTY t\ ---- % / /04Â©L - be respons:ble for the clean up and removal of all sediment and debns from all , 6/ 2,0 - 4204Â«<I %30~ /. 4 -------4319 < ~~ -- - FOUND 2' IRON PIPE "~-~~7 5 Inadvertently deposited on existing streets, sidewalks, or other public rights of / 1 - dromage infrastructure and other public facilities 0% r z -----2/ / 3. -w *-- --r:frr r.wÂ·~21F w . _,14'2 \\ 4 (9 ) The contractor shall immediately clean up any construction materials &30 0% WITH BRASS TAG, LS . 91*> 1 \ 60 /- 2Â®00. 0. . ---- -bf- i- 4;4 \\/\ \ h <%-,1.\ 62: .- ' h<J~k'@\ -> Q 4845. way, and make sure streets and walkways are cleaned at the end of each ~ :W,8Â£4Ztr~Â·P~<3~----- '~ - ~ -~~ \\\ (10 ) All retained sedlments, particularly those on paved roadway surfaces, shall 7 D5\ />4 , working day . h.% /3-X ~- 4*133~ ; L.320>Â·=u.,sgust B 3 c f - 700, "~ L__ -N ....\:% be removed and disposed of In a manner and location so as not to cause their release into any waters of the United States. -- 1 j ~ X~ ~2\40-h ./-1- , 4?CU. 4,0 ', Fili'.- 1 --- - STEWART, HW, INC j F (11 ) No soil stockpile shall exceed ten (10) feet in height All soil stockpiles shall 0.47 ''- \ be protected from sediment transport by surface roughening, watering, and 0.47 0 61 ON _ 3 MIRADA ROAD ' perimeter silt fencing Any soil stockpile remaining after thirty (30) days shall be PIPE 7-.+ COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 ' FOUNd 2" IRON PIPE~ seeded and mulched f A . ' WITH BRASS TAG, LS ; %64 04 (12 ) The stormwater volume capacity of detention ponds will be restored and 4./...... , 7 ---,32cz(Â£282#P , ' 4845 / storm sewer lines will be cleaned upon completion of the project and before STEWART, HW, INC . - turning the maintenance over to the City of Loveland or Homeowners 3450 FALL RIVER ROAD - 1- / Association (HOA) (13 ) City Ordinance and Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 RECEPTION NO 35162-11-001 9/31 7â€ž* i Â« -*\0 *--- - : pollutont or contam,nated water from construction sites Pollutants Include, but 2 ' i .* rv'-, ' &33\ f\~ requirements make It unlawful to discharge or allow the discharge of any .Â¥, - cre not limited to discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, / 43'V-...ek\\ i x - 4. - < ,- chemicals, oil and gas products, litter, and sanitary waste The developer shall i Cok &\ k --2 / /,// /,P 44 X4\141 PARCEL f ROCKY MOUNTAIN GATEWAY P,U D PHASE I - \ I -0 0PILL , / ot all times take whatever measures are necessary to assure the proper 1 \ all applicable local, state, and federal regulations CDOT PROECT F-9 00) 1 containment and disposal of pollutants on the site in accordance with any and //////944 (14 ) A designated area shall be provided on site for concrete truck chute washout / Cumâ‚¬ DATA &Â£1 - - // / 44\0 // . The area shall be constructed so as to contain washout material and located at 1 \\ I least fifty (50) feet away from any waterway during construction Upon . / l'Â¢\C removed and properly disposed of prior to the area being restored --C--- -- completion of construct,on activities the concrete washout material w~11 be f -016 / - i W 4 , --- ,\ (15 ) To ensure that sed,ment does not move off of Individual lots one or more of 1 2 \ . , the following sed,ment/erosion control BMPs shall be installed and maintained CRm:~'LE-COR * -' .1.1 f Â« until the lots are sufficiently stabilized, as determined by the erosion control %77*5*.6 -- , , inspector, (Loveland GMA dc city limits only) 65 ..+. -39 \ \4 - -*f 4: Vil' 1/' (0.) Below all gutter downspouts , 6 - ~ 6 ' (b ) Out to drainage swales SCROGGIN, SHIRLEY S, CHARITABLE TRUST -.-' - % - t. 2 (c ) Along lot perimeter , 2 - i 1 \:0':~ FBO ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK c/o BUCHHORTZ, CURT W, CO-TRUSTEE i~ r (d ) Other locations, if needed 3450 FALL RIVER ROAD ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 (16,) Conditions In the field may warrant erosion control measures in addition to RECEPnON NO 35162-11-902 -b ' what is shown on these plans The Developer shall implement whatever measures ore determined necessary, as directed by the City of Loveland 1 (17.) A Vehicle Tracking Control Pad shall be installed whenever it is necessary for construction equipment including but not limited to personal vehicles exiting existing roadways No earthen materials, ie, stone, dirt, etc, shall be placed in the curb & Gutter or roadway as a ramp to access temporary stockpile(s), staging area(s), construction material(s), concrete washout area(s) and/or building site(s) REVISIONS Date -SEETEMBER 11, 2007 Drawn D.M.C./B.R.B. CLIENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (1" = 50') PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. SHEETS te Ry Description Field Book - Cherked D.M.C. NO. OF It, By Description HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 Scole 1 " =50' r,IP By- Description - Approved B.W.S. PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO M-GRADEDRAIN50 DWG 5 00000( ROCKY MOUNTAIN NAnONAL PARK HEADQUARTERS AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE M .00,Z LOO N (M) Â» 909 M .00.ELOO N 08) ,5 908 At .11.00 N 1 = = 9-11 -07 JLM @ 2. 46PM / 1; rZz,,-/ ; , , /\4 / . 1 , ./ 4 1,~Z / \ Zk ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK 00 5.3 8. mm , 1.L It 148 ~ 11 ek:# i 4. li A3 1% 2 / O.6 /1 : o /vr ~- GRAPHIC SCALE - JO 0 15 30 60 1 inch =3On. - 9 . 1 .1.2 . //11> 9 -<1 40 n LEGEND 0.47 0.47 39 57 0.61) -- - -4971- -- -- -- EXISTING 1' CONTOUR \>ff -/091. EXISTING 5' CONTOUR ..f f i 4971 - PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR L i NÂ«n //1 \ 4970- PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR . FOUND 2" i f /1 k . ' 1; 60),1 00;;000;:;( ~ % ~ 034 7 4 202%393E O-0 0 C VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL PAD ; i J 0Aohor,0, i /7 \ 1 1 \ A~ FOREBAY \ 11 1 3 1 0< 19 Â«3 ROCK DIKE 1 1 1 1 tr /Al A = BASIN DESIGNATION 1 1 i i , / L 400AM i } B= AREAIN ACRES PARCEL 1 ~' ~ 1 C. = COMPOSITE RUNOFF 1 ' PANE lt_lf)/ < f Bld COEFFICIENTS FOUND 2" IRON C 10 -(10 YR. EVENT) BRASS TAG, LS Cloo-(100 YR. EVENT) 1/1 1 3) 2, ~ D= DESIGN POINT DESIGNATION k# / f 0.36 0.28 4/# 1 / 0.52 PROPOSED STORM SEWER - SF - SILT FENCE /9/ // / 4/ 4 i I 1 / l 1, A /6/ i Elll: Di j 11 -. 2 It / i lit. 1 40 3 > J it , ! 942 11 3 0 It i haqk 0 0 RV U 1 .22 1 / P ?4 f 7 1 L 0 / // FOUND 2" IRON PIPE IN CONCRETE WITH BRASS TAG, LS 4845. Clo Cloo Q10 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) 4%. .\ h \ 1 . N. 0.28 0.52 6.8 19.1 \ 0.28 0.52 15.8 44.8 \\\ 0410-1-..1\ \ 4 9 :t 1 0.28 0.52 20.6 59.6 \ \ a \ 0.44 0.60 0.4 v.w 0.31 0.54 17.9 47.2 64 \\ 3 //D5Y 0.41 0.58 1.9 4.0 ~ Â·Â·~,Â». ':FOUND 2"~IRON PIPE WITH. 014 - I 1-14U t340 \ .l D JZ.ZZ 0.39 0.57 3.0 6.8 0 ~'ck, â‚¬ BRASSLIAG,.LS 4845// / D5 B5,OS-4 129.16 0.15 0.25 0.50 66.2 204.0 ilill!11 REVISIONS Date SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 Drawn D.M.C./B.R.B. CUENT SHEET NO. te By 11-rription HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 SHEETS 1/ Ry Description Checked D.M.C. SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (1" = 30') PROJECT NO. NO. OF Field Book M-GRADEDRAIN30-A.DWG le By - Description PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO Scale 1 "=30' Approved BWS- 6 06Â£9 ~11 I ..1 . 4 - I . 24 A . 9 1 Â¥ 1 0,4 . . I F h . . AA- .. . 0 . . ~71.",I'~I.---.. r . ......limm........./0/1/. -~ ~ 1.1 . 4--AM.*&1.. - 1.1 C . ~ ..... . v I'll' iliallilillim~~ilillillip/4 I &1'll/ ..1, I~-I~.:.1,40 .: ./1/... m "-' 47 i 0 1.lill 0. . - . I .r al:milliwiI'llililli~.imy A' Llill- ..4 I e -Vilillilillillimelillililillilill . '4011/ 04:/ . 2Â¥.1 : e .. -. 4 . I : - . 41 - . '1Ii - / 4 1. . I . , '... 9 ...1 # . ...: .. . I 15*. 4/ 1/A 1 u m ~ A-.F - 01 lili - 1Il| _2_ Â»,LA . . I . 4... 0 ..... .2.11 . . 1,Â· . /. . I . I . .1 . -t 0 . . -//5/0~ ' 6 - 1 0.0 . I . . . 0 .4/ . -10/.lilli.... â€ž :. 0. 1/1.11~ .. .. . 7/, . A -- .....1 1 .1- .. U,/ /4. /~F:rilimillibm// 4:ililv --le' .pl- 9 . Â»2 1 Â·Â·Â·de) I . '00 - .. .. D 0 . ..... ... ... A I ..... .. I. 1 0 .. 7.11"V 0 0 1 ....... . 0 0 00: ':1. '' . Â·.1-*32*AD . 0 :. , 0 A '. ..6. 149 1 : 0 0 0, 0 â‚¬*Xt & ./ Ill 1 Proposed Condition tutzEÂ·-/ Design Point Basin(s) Area (acre) % Imp. Clo Cloo Q10 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) Dlf Bla,Blb,Blc,Bld,Ble,Blf,OS-1 7.15 6.35 0.28 0.52 6.8 19.1 / Bla,Blb,Blc,Bld,Ble,Blf,82,OS-1,OS-3 FOUND STATE HIGHWAY R.O. W. MARKER, STAMPED STA: D2 17.79 6.08 0.28 0.52 15.8 44.8 215+56, EL 8218.75, HELD LOCATION ON THE 1 1\ NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO HWY 34, D3a 83a,OS-2,OS-5 29.04 4.49 0.28 0.52 20.6 59.6 HOWEVER MONUMENT IS 1.25' WEST OF SECTION LINE - / 1Â»9 (R.O. W. PLANS SHOW THIS MONUMENT ON SECTION D3b B3b 0.20 47.06 0.44 0.60 0.4 0.9 LINE). R.O.W. MARKER IS N6605'39"W 1.36' FROM D3c B3c 12.16 12.76 0.31 0.54 17.9 47.2 ~ CORNER. D4a B4a 1.04 38.34 0.41 0.58 1.9 4.0 /1 (BASIS OF BEARINGS) D4b B4b 1.75 32.22 0.39 0.57 3.0 6.8 h %/ \ D5 B5,OS-4 129.16 0.15 0.25 0.50 66.2 204.0 WEST LINE Sl /2 NW1/4 SECTION 16, TEN, R73W ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK N 00'12'00" W 1274.810 (M) THE Sh NWk OF SECTION 16, T5N, R73W (Njfs CORNER). FOUND 34" IRON PIPE, HELD LOCATION AS THE NW CORNER OF Of N 00'11' W 1275.7 0?1) ~ FOUND ACCESSORIES AS REFERENCED ON THE 1978 1 9--6 N 0012'00" W 468.96' (R) POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PROVIDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION. MONUMENT RECORD OF THIS CORNER. 440 --7-- Cy"I - d.0 - 0,0 - cm ~ N 0072'00" W 468.34' (M) x- X- X X-X-X-X-X-X-X- .- X -- < de -X - X - - - - - / 4. < 1 1 1 -1- / \ 1 \ 4-2/,1 60 109.4~ 1 // ------ 1 1 1 1-0 -9 ..ILL k N 00'12'00" W 806.47' (M) 1 N 00'11' W 806.3' (Rl) 1 1 1 \\ 1 /7 - 4, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f\%\ 1 inch = 30 ft. l 1 1 1 1 /1/ &1 Â» 1 \ --- 1 7 lil -- 11 1 / ...k l h-\ - '5' 1 1 1 4,6 / 1 -1 k i ill i I / i q /, 1 /1 / P , 4 1 / /. 1 f ' /11 1 1 \1 1/ k 1 1 1/ill\ 1/Â« F \ \ / 1 | , j' LEGEND Illl \ I 1 1 1 \ -$ AÂ« ...7 >< A. 4 V... N ,0 k li 5 11 1 74 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 49 +4)43 90.\ EXISTING 1' CONTOUR \ i j r 1'' 0040'Op'. b EXISTING 5' CONTOUR / EDDING / 1 4971- PROPOSED 1 CONTOUR 1 02 1 \/ 1 Y+\ ~~: ~ ~ AREA k / / 7 1 197$- PROPOSED 5 CONTOUR 1 U m\. *14, 1% I 000 c VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL PAD 7./ . k / e lilli iii I ..j 0 W W WO Co OOOC N _ _. 1- 0000 O ~ 0000 1 1 F--. 0000 En 00 - 1 0000 I k /1 \ 93 , , / 1 .1 / 000( 000 / E-350- p, / 1 ~p <3'1 1 1 . 00 ) 1 /6 i~Â·~~ , -~ -F-~- /~ ~ ' ' i I , ~/~ .LL01 0 N /.77 / ' 1/ 1 yaw 1 1 1 1 4:@ 7/ CD ' FOREBAY /r j 4 111<â‚¬ ~4 ,,/ 1 1 / 1 ///F 0 ~ | | , v .1 ~,= , - --NL ROCK DIKE -I-Ii / f 1 1 I Ill 1 4 i 1 -. - : / 1 ./ ROCKY MOUNTAIN GATEWAY P.U.D. PHASE I - \ . $ . + f..2 1 1 \Llit 14% tÂ·: , \ \ \ / 2 / i 't \ , 10 f..0 1/ 1 1 / 1...I.t y 1 / /Al A = BASIN DESIGNATION 0 B = AREA IN ACRES l B Iclo ~ / 1 )/ i / t 4 1 1 1 7 11 922 -%\ J/ C = COMPOSITE RUNOFF i I j COEFFICIENTS Q 'D i . 4 I -*.- --- --.< -4Â» -U Â· 0 / 1. ....i 141 li 1 . \ ~ Cioo=(100 YR. EVENT) AA / P / \ D 1 , 9 1 .. -24Â»..4 9 5, >< /,7 / 1 ~ 4Â·' 8 CMP 'CUL RT . - ~* ~~ 44~~ (\1@u/&~ 1-- 2-~-3 ~ 1 1 = DESIGN POINT DESIGNATION / 7 2 u.~ , . ...1 1?-.4.0 , 1: / tv . .. - . .... ., .. PROPOSED STORM SEWER t., C MOVE) .-I 4 0# t' f i : \ - \ 2 f // /0 8 1 / 0 Â· k -Ph ...1-- L j j- J L# 511 v 94N-rS~ORMER @OX, (100 KVA) 07 V / / B (0 1 k. , 443 0 li - 0 , 891(*> li I. ' ><Z --/ / 1'' /\ L \\ flum 1 1 / . 4% 4.1. 1 0 / 41 0 4 10 >< 4Â¥e, 3.3 Â£/ 7 1- : 17Â·j'.. k 30 1. 11 1 :-'. - SF - SILT FENCE 0 1 / - 1 \/ \\ 1 . 3...1 1 ; .... 1 15.5' ~ i \31 I rn t. i At 1 \ 1 1.. /\,/ 1 1Â«4 R'44\ e \< It} 931\ / 7.4," i 4 \ - 1 /. f \1 . 4 99 Â»= LA , 1 , .L-1- 0 0\ 4 4 / F,Irikil E' / \4 Â·e_% \ f / \/ l 0 9 / D) 2OOAMP *VltE \ 9/ ult-\ 1 *xist. 1 1 1 . 1 2 1 f 'V' 4-j j \ 1 ~" LVERT, 1 PANELS / \\ 1 \/ CMP\, 1 +4j 0 Z '&15 \ / 8.- /1.94 1 ~ (REMOVE) j 1 17 44 - 4 / / 9\ \ 4~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ N[34?t~JUÂ¥EJ]?~~, Al'~' i.\1~ 9\ \\ \ j .0 0, 31 1 - ill 9, f.1 re ? 69 . / 0 4 /'U r i ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK 1 1 Â·lt:I 1 < 2 1 i' \ p tr'41 1 3 A , / 447 / \ 3 Â» 1 1 1 1,1 I. . R% 1 1 .1 ,// t. : 9 / 1 1 3 Q M 1 ELLI \ \\ 4 4 1 C i par'- i Z A W cn 9 4: h /le f f Â·1 . CD (O 81#K-__ e><\ . 10 f.%1/1 : 00 N 60 00 0-1 -11 li j $ 3,14, / b.---Al 2/f- 1 i \ i .1 X 63' , '. rm. J ; 4 / 0 , m 1.'i / - al - .: ~' r- h \ I m 1 W / f ZA:~ 7 7\ 1 84 1 i 02'i@1/ /9 1 3 1 1 1 ..1.. ': 1 r' 4/1 1 m ~, 4/ 1 M r /\ , U ;V / m : / U ~ Mt z 'A. . ar al.\ \1 Â£ 1 I , \ itti 3 ..O. 1 4 \ 1 11 -O . / i 0 u 6 0 6- ..; . 4 a /-N, / Cl \ r If- . /0 1 =1 '' 9, \X , 1 1 Z 1- . I , 1,3 (9 -41 *A W S . q. Q 0' ' or 0749 0,1 0 . '3&1 r. 1- //1 - IMI'll ' 1657L 11 // r j / , '6/ 0 ' Â£_ & 9 - 0.-J ./ 1,/ 0 , '/ O >\ / 1 //f . \1~ V.% 1 , , 1 it 1 N - /3 / 1 i Ii'(1 , /1 / 1 4, / EXIS~ ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ .f r / 0, / i , EX.. ASPHA /3Â«\ 1 / 3 / / (REMOVE) ' 0 1 j , / 9 r. 1- 1 5: , -1 /1 1 8" CMP CULVERT A41) . â‚¬8 V ./ 3-- 42\42/ 99 . / / Ae // j~/\\ (113 , 11 1 , 1 1 4// f 2,1- 3 L.6: Fl ' t 1 9 . - 11 41,./ Ii, ~\ ///6gill / L / 1 /\UX/m* r. f / 2 1 c \/al ' , i i \4 / 7 1\ ..) 11 --J ... 1 -F.Â«t~ / 10 / -- ..94'. , 0 0 ,// 0/\9) >f I. 1. . l 4 4 .:. i U Â· 1, 4 4 ft'.132 tt f i\ . 1/ 4 4 1 .1/ 1 0 4 8274 0 -4 11 /. 0 - fiith ~ [ 4 â€¢:4' 00 +J I 1 ill 1% / /4.37 , 1 . 4> 6 6 \ POUT 11\ 1 1 y 1 1 5% + Py 1 i ~ Â«-f / 4 ,# * 2-07 02.0. t 0, 1 2. \ N. m \\\ .11 .11 1 1 / b 9 \\\ RD 94 / 00 j -21 1 2 In / / ty / Ap / f 96\ ~ 1, 111 1 1 /0 /1 / \) / 112 3 0 1 1./ \\ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 7-0 4 1 1 1 0 I A , 1 1 1 1 /11 k l 1 1 v : C / *TDOOR 4 1 - O, ' 4 V . 1 1.. 1% 1 / A...24 / 1 I 1. 1 :, l 1 - , 1 hi: 1 1 1/ i \\ 1 ff 1 1 1 1..........- 1 1 1 4/1 1/ , 1. /\ 0 il I r i j.. 11 /// 1/ 1 1 1% 9 -I 1 1 - . m 1 1 -1 1 1 , . 1 1 4:5* 1 .1 , D~\\.\ 4'i i'- 0 0 --1 3, 2 > / Lly /1 gy 0 0 / e 1 Z 1 2: - 21 i ' ti \ l/\ .10 00 0 Â· O > 0 d 4 01/ 4,9 44. \ cit-- f C / 00 04 */9 \ 1 j O. 0 / / 1 1\91 5 00 1/t (34.m \ \* 9 1 11/ilil 1,1. '' 6 3/. , f *1 1 Â· f ; 1. 7 4 4 , / Â»6 /1-22 CAD j , . Â·Â·Â· In & 1 7 9 - ~ 1 I\'1 310 *,f..#*#., Ii= .'.- L / / 0 j.>/ 1/\43 0 ), ,/ %'*:I / 1 <liti , .1 /N ! IF//ha-- 1/1/ 1 , -/- Â» I) + 13\1 1 <th ...7 .ty \ . / 1:... , 1/Â·Â· , \ ./'' / 34/\ Y / 1 1.91;417.1 1. \\\, ils O 1 4 REVISIONS Date SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 Drawn D.M.C./B.R.B. CLIENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (1" = 30') PROJECT NO. SHEETS NO. OF Dot' By Description Field Book _ Chp.cked D.M.C. HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 ~ ~ Dite Ry Description Drill By - 1199.rit'tion Scnle 1 "=30' SHEET NO. Approved B.W.S. PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO M-GRADEDRAIN30-B.DWG I.IOnal,SNOO 3 410 00' C 1SIX3 N 88'05 88'04'u'00" E 784.15' (R) ~ ~ 9-11-07 MC @ 2:35 PM V M hi 0 96ie 1 UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SLOPE MAY VARY /2 ,Â· 9 ~ VARIES f.'.: ... . AGGREGATE 00 9 , 0 ,~f GEOGRID VARIES , --5-] 12-,---- --- 4 WALL BASE ~ 6 n MaNIMUM OOMPACrED GRANULAR BA5E - "'~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~'~ ~*'~~~~~~-~~ ~~~'--'~~-~~"-~' ~~-~~~'~~'~~ -~~~~~~~~~~" -~~~~~~~~~~~~0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~- '~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ '~~~~'~-----~~- "~-~-'~~~~--~ ---OF MOUNTAI PRIOR TO CU ~~~~7*-~~--~~' ~~~~ ~~-'- ~ ---~~ "~ -~~ ~' --2- =-=TO -8;06-U- -re-/7 ...7-~- -~--- 2222J .ILL -Z- / ~ Ir,vÂ¥.0 -~ ~- Mâ€¢ -Etâ€ž 4- 8305 ----- - - ---- - --- ------- --- ------ -- -----Â·--- ---- Â·-- ------- ----Â·-- -------- ---------- --'--- -- A.WI7~T -Â·- --Â·--- Â·------Â·- -------- - ----2-=1.--- '/ ...--- - - ---- - - SEE WAL NOTE ON THIS SHEET ---- 78305-2 WALL NOTE -- RE rAINING WALL WILL CONSIST OF A PRODUCT CALLED "ANCHOR -V -- HIc]HLAND STONE" DISTRIBUTED BY"PAVESTONE"THE RETAINING - -- --. .- ---- -------- WALL WILL BE ENGINEERED ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN ~---~ ~ " ~ ~~~-- --- -- ----- ---- r.--- REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ------ ---- ---- - ----- - ----- - RETAINING WALL PRODUCT, AND ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN --â„¢~IN.7.7 --J---f 3----- 28300 -1 RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO -- - -- ---- - - - ----= - - --- -- -- -------.. ----- -. - ---.----. INSTALLATION. 7221 SECTION A-=A-=T. ..=227 - - --- - - -- - -* - - .*.W*.--e ..# -# .--I..*-- V-.I.--.1--4.#*IV .-*--- .*#-I..-Vr#-4-Bl*-I+.I&- 8285 - ---- --- ---- ---- -- ---- -- --- -- -- _- ,- -- ------- e Turrr -8330~0 M. - " I-j -- . V .-# -*#...i. * .... . ..-.. I. ' â€ž #-'-- r -- - # - -1-~-~ gl- . .--1- w - - --* - . Ir~ 10 ~* 1 - - ----. --1 8325 ' 44 2.3.- --Â»-- 11 1 -- --- -- , ----- -------- 3-72,--- -783207 - -- ASSUMED ORIGINAL GRAD ------Â·--- - -"-Â·--*- - - ---- -------- ------ - ---- ----- --- .-- -. ----- . ----- ----- - OF MOUN AIN.PRIOR TO UT_ ..--- ---. -- 0 - ------.- --.----- .._ 1_-~ .~IEJU UNL -_-LIZE~_IZE.-2- OW=8~06 33 21-Ir-77 -7'-UfFE' _ -- SEE WALL NOTE ON THIS HEET IZZI . -ZEZZIL -_LIJIZE 7 - - -V '. .%- :. .- *- ... ..,~â€ž-1...1.11-81...1-11--'.~ - 8305 ---- Â·------- --------- ------ ----- -- ----- ------ -- - -- -- - - - ~- - 1 - -- -~- /70.9.- 5- -- ---=2 --8305 -- ---Ill------ -- 'Y -fl --- --- .Â£-- -- -- S AB=8303.33 .- --- - -- - -- - --- -- 8300 232---- - -- --- --- - --- -- --ZE'ZIZIL E-ZEZZLE ZEZEZZ-JIC IC-ZEZI ZE-2-ZIL -- iff~~illili 9% EXIST MOUNTAIN GR E 1, -4,-111- -0+80 -0+60 -0+40 -0+20 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 REVISIONS Date_SERTEMBER_-11~_29QZ_~ Drawn P.S.B.CSP CUENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION TITLE SITE SECTIONS PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. NO. OF SHEETS Date - By - Description - Field Book - - Checked B.W.S. HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 Date - By - Description - â€ž , ESTES PARK, COLORADO X-SECT.DWG - 8 Date - By - Description - Scale_BL_11_= 10'; V: 1 =5 Approved_-8.W.S. PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 1. ---Il.--'.*b-i.- W.ii-JA- 118 1 lilli' NI-1 213d021 3Nll 1 3 OUd A rgÂ·. Â£9 31Â¥MS 7/3 Iii I 9-11-07 BRB 12:00PM 12' . 812&!. L /f' ' - ~ ~~ '-:t- 4~-,Â·- RED . 20' DRIVE ~ ~-~- WHITE 4 - BLACK 44 w 5' PEDESTRIAN PATH : liti - 1/2' DIA. 18' 5.00' 20' Ii., p. .*g.: ':..Â· *Â·i...11.9-4 F.E.S.(TYP) TRAVEL <1E TRAVEL 5 3 412*EN 9 FIRE LANE ~ 1Â·.1 -Â·r ,,3,3.,MA?i;f.gi,0,43,704â€ž%53Â·..â€ž21 - 1-0.33' 0.23' 10' ~ 10' VARIES 1 VARIES 2Â· I E I 1. 2%~5% h PROPOSED FL 2% 2% 1 1--â€¢ 111-Â·-4 117 , 1.' ..iLL11 rnL.LlÂ·Tri bRADE-OF DITCH 01 - 9 ,7 - Â»00-~~ 711--Ad~ 7llI1III11ttlL WW '3 m 0 3" HOT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-~~ -J< 31 0% h = FIRE LANE SIGN DETAIL 0.63' - ~-4" CRUSHED GRAVEL 8 3 - 1Â·-Â·Â·â€¢~0.67' EXISTING GRAVEL BASE 2 . MIN. 30 LF *VARIES CMP + (F. E.S) 5.67' :. r:,1..~ F,. fl.XZ . ~ >~91 2#,X>Â»~ 42 F Ex: 2 0 â‚¬\46Â»241 5 SLOPE PER PLAN TYPICAL 5' PATH TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD SECTION 3,4 ' t.\ ...\ 4 8 MI h 11 PARKING BLOCK N.T.S. N.AS. MDIES! N.T.S. i 3 1. THE SIGN PLATE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12'X 18Â· WITH A THICKNESS OF.080 ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL CULVERT SECTION 2. THE SIGN FACE SHALL HAVE A WHITE REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND WITH A RED LEGEND. USE THE STANDARD 3M SCOTCHLITE SIGN N.T.S. i FACE NUMBER R7-32 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH RED SCREEN PRINTED , LETTERING AS SHOWN ABOVE. Note, Sign must loe ptaced at a 45' angle HANDICAP PARKING REQUIREMENTS (AS PER "ADA") FIRE ACCESS ROAD SIGNS LARIMER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION REVISION NO: 1 DRAWING URBAN AREA LARIMER COUNTY CONSTRUCTION REVISION NO: 1 DRAWING DRAWINGS DATE: 03/01/02 1407 WrE.Em STANDAPDS URBAN AREA DRAWEIGS DATE: 02/27/02 1418 SIREE! STANDARS 1 4. CT-E.,1 U U <7 0 0 0 C.j~%~>~ Al<- 1 1 (3 83 0 -0\Q~91 E.. / -Cl ~ * ~ 8V F 24. DIAMETER M[N. 9 w 0 0 30 evo(lip@9 -~D = fig E & TA D Jr VENTS 242% 8 B %2][ 30000[ F :mÂ« ,j i ,_-1 11 60-00 J.zg**EE}--â‚¬+ Â·~Â» â‚¬2- -.t. + .-,41~3E1:3- A- 3-~M ~~A GROUTECh C) ED ... STORMOEWER PIPE i i fiÂ¢3%YEL) C)]/ ~ 4 --- : --\l:/ NEENAH FRAM & GRATE ./ Â·A TYPE R-3574-20 or EQUAL F/-", Â· Â· Â·Â· -t ' 1 Â· Â·0- . - 2.20 L 24Â· D[AMETE"IM ~ NEAIAB~h3574-20 OR EQUIVALENT SIZE 45 9/32 X 24 1/32' / 58Â» ~61- 24. 1 16.1 r Â·Â· 1-3 - ~ 46. 8244.00 TOP OF BERM- 8244.00 0304*21 : - FRI &%#t,4 r STANDARD THREADED 1 L 2 .Â· -0Â· --- IsS~ CLEAN OUT TO GRADE ' C 6*8.2 CHANNEL EMBEDED FINISH GRADE --~ / CLEANOUT{TO BE SAME . . RECTANGLE FRAME ~~ GROUTn ..1 -Â·siF=1 1 :H f LONG SWEEP WYE ~,f MATERIAL AS PIPE) \ / GROUTED RIPRAP TO TOE 12" ~Â· 101 .-2' w.~ER rF o .Â· 44/ 1 14' f 4-le.'i LEVEL 10' L -1-A] 1, 1 0 1 i j 4 pl-421 WELL-SCREEN FRAME MIN. LENGTH = 20' Â· 1'-6"xi,-6"aÂ·- LJ L CLEANOUT FRAME ITnt ~ IEXIST 8" CMP ~ / 1 ATTACHED TO PLATE BY - D II4UT C INTERMITTANT WELDS - MIN. NOTE: CONC. PAD CAST IRON CO/ER MARKED"CO 1 I l.1 7. 1 S=0.50% 8241.07 EXIST 8" CMP PLAN VIEW ALL RIPRAP SHALL #4 0 12~ C#-.) * -1-1 POND BOTTOM - - o.c..TYP. - BE GROUTED AFTER ~ BEND OR WYE -, 3' CLR CROSS SFCTirIN INSTALLATION! AS REQUIRED ~ ~ ~ NOTES TyCLR.0.F. Tf ~ - GRADE OVER STORM SEWER SECnON A-A 1. SECONDARY COMPARTMENT HAS VOLUME EQUAL TO 2Â»CLR.I.F. 1/3 OF TOTAL CAPACITY, GROUTED WATER 60Â£â€¢'E FOREBAY PER PLAN 2, ALL P]PE AND FITTINGS To BE CAST RCN. MIN. 3' DIAMETER, CAPACITY CAPAC]TY 122&%3 : ~ 12" MIN. LENGTH = 20' 3', 12" , FLOW 1 WALLS AND BOTTOM REINFORCED THROUGHOUT wiTH <APPROX) (APPROX> N.T.S. OALLONS CU. FT. 2 * 16 6/10 REMESH CDEF SECTION B-B UIN. MIN. WIDTH = VARIES MIN. 4"PVC PIPE REBAR ON 6Â· CENTERS, NO. 4 REBAR ON 6Â· CENTERS N.T.S. 4. COVERS TO BE REINFORCED LONGITUDINALLY WITH NO. 6 1565 100 40 50 48 62 F.E.~ 01 AT 2% MAX. ACCESS HOLES. 2035 /3 52 62 60 74 1800 121 46 56 54 68 VIDTHWISE. AND NO. 8 REBAR DIAGONALLY AROUND 5. CLEAN OUT SHALL BE IRON BODY FERRULE WITH BRASS 2505 186 64 74 72 86 SCREW PLUG. 76 86 84 98 2973 229 CLEANOUT DETAIL 6. VENr prpE SHALL BE CAST IRON TO A POINT 6 STORM SEWER PIPE- ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL. 32;0 250 82 92 90 104 NLIS. 7. GREASE CAPACITY RATED FOR LARGE COMPARTMENT ONLY. 3â€¢â€¢5 27] 88 98 96 110 3/4" TO 1-1/2" ~32* 9. 8. CHECK WITH SUPPLIER FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS, GRANULAR BEDDING 050=VARIES TYPE B GREASE INTERCEPTOR BT 2050) = MIN. THICKNESS APPROVED: DETAIL N GROUTED AFTER INSTALLATION bi=*2 WATER UTILITIES DETAILS . , ~~ CITY OF FORT COLLINS SEWER CONSTRUCTION ES~. r EXIST 8" CMP DATE: 6/15/90 1 1 58 SECTION MEW DRAWN 5: DR, SC 46" . Icl TOP PLATE EL 8244.0~ FOREBAY AT OUTLET PIPE -75- ~ - 5/16=HOLES a 1/4"ANCHORS - PLATE B r-1-1-7- TYPICAL (4) N.T.S. - kk 'Â· -11-6. O 1 0 1 #4 012 0 | O.C. TYP. Z 2*rWAR32%Ulri ~;~s~_A!;12'6~ v.7?~c- 3' 6' 13- N =~~--42. 93 STAINLESS STEEL O | <0 VATTLE. A .... 3.'llâ‚¬HT LOAD Ill TEND LEAVING 4'-60 OF STAKE PITRUDIG ABOVE PLATE A TOI PICK Tâ€¢E VATTLE UP AND COUD PULL IT m.'ELY:~rw'n.r:&/may.Nif1 396.': 07: N OFF T. STAKES I THEY ARE nRIVEN no~N .ATTLE STAICES SIOULD TIâ‚¬H . DRP/EN LL-SCREEN & FRAME 6 "4 ~ GAPS EXIST IN SILT FENCE 7 \ 5&%2/MO:=AU'E IS ~~C~A~~N~ZED SEE 4G 1 \J,- DIKE SECTKÂ»1 \ A hed \ ROTATE SECOND Illal + [=3> - 2727 -* ' 44-44Â·11Â·43'1~j,i Â·3-130.2 1"(TYP.~ 4 N ./ STAKIS PERPENDICULAR TO TIC S.[rE. 1-+ 1-6 K. EL-8241.07 --- siLT FENCE FABRIC (ASâ„¢ D6461> AMCH[~ED I STAPLES-. ~ ~ to 1/4. \9-01/80 HOLES 0 4" O.C. T~~al - A-m -T. 1 1 O /407 - FLOW N.T.S. i"(TYP.)- ~ FLOW 0'*Â£4. 2Qi;.SECIIQN W# --W PLAN VIEW Eky: ggm~gr.I POST SHALL BE /1}â‚¬D AS SHOWN. THEN ROTATED:80Â· IN DIRECTION . p- 1 -30 /-,a PLATE A DETAIL SIOVN AND DRIVEN INTO TIâ‚¬ \ ,~.DITCH L . /. DISTANCE SUCH T..T POINTS SILT DIKE UNIT ..... C & D ARE: ~ EQUAL ELEVATI. .... N. T.S. <&4433-L-- /1-poâ„¢r o SILLEENQUQINIS .W A 1- C 19\J. 34 ,>f --M- A - \\ \ ROCK, VATTLE OR SILT Dll(E- . 42.-7-2-- 7 ---- . C..ACTED BACKFILL -4 21.al-YtEYL ELALMIEK 4\~WATTLE WELL-SCREEN FRAME~~< --~7 ATTACHED TO PLATE BY - INTERMITTANT WELDS QEIAILA 1 4â€¢ x 1 4' Woon[N FENCE POSTS -1 FLOW STAPLES A STAPLES 8' CrrP) PODIT A-/n>h- -*rp 1=. NOT TOSCALE 6' /6' I ./... 1 .VA 1M1IAU,8Ilmt..~Â¤, --IRT FENCE FA]RIC <ASTM D6461> ANCIORED IN 1. DRIVEC POSTS VERTICALLY INTO THEC GRCU. TO A MINIMUM .Pâ„¢ OF let .]TE, Â¢2 11:*>.~ta"<..Â· .:.Â·9.94,2Â¥*0uwa.a ' Â·Â·1Â·6.k â€ž.Â·':t. ..,1 'Â·Â·'Â· TRENCH AND ATT..D TO POST. "49;'&5,~&I,;&7ING,& VIDE AND 4- 0â‚¬EP AL[-â€¢G TIâ‚¬ LPâ‚¬ 5 '110,4 â€¢1000 ENTRENCH 3 INTO TRENCH .2/JU/LE POINTS A IUST . HIGER THAN POINT B 1 ANCHO~ TRENCH SHALL DE EXCAVATED BY HAND, WITH TRENCIER, 1 VITH SILT 24' MIN _ ~A.,plr*+ FENCE INSTALLATICÂ»4 MACHINEL NO RCAD GRADERS. BACKHOES. ETC. SHALL K m POINT 1 - FL- 4. NOT LESS mi THE 'CITT) 1â€¢ / 7% SILT FENCE FABRIC SI'Il I BURIED IN Dllâ‚¬ SECTION XCI123-&=8 ..499 - i ' 1 42. 'ON T}E TRENCK i *PEMEN,EfEE?Efr '' , 4%1. 52509 1 WATER QUALITY OUTLET STRUCTURE 42 &11 11 9 DITJ;MU~ZION ~ ~24:x:x:#;' I. 57,1.M **WLâ€¢A- AS ACCEPTED BY TIE C~~~. POINT A ./ST I. HI'll THAN .... 1 TO DmECT WATER flov -~~t-/hi 1141.1 It rri-Â·RMQt I 18' * y OVER TIâ‚¬ DIKE BUT NOT AROÂ»ID TIC ENDS OF TEâ‚¬ Dll'I , 8Â· v &92UÂ· T040, UNEXCAVATE BELOW .0Wt.T (pER SPECIFICATIONS 02375> ~ - d-FILTER GEOTEXTILE 1 - LEQSS-_SECILQW E ..0.-/ .4 \ 6' (MIN) -1 :42Â·.96Â·2 2 SIGN~FICANT STORM EVENTS AND MAKE REPAIRS OR CLEAN OUT UPSTREAM SEDDâ‚¬NT 1.m7:~%â€ž-t~,J2 WH~,f'Wn, SIDDENT 1. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL INSPECT SILT FENCE EVERY TIC WEEKS AND AFTER AS NECESS,â€¢NYÂ· * 2. SED'MENT ACCUIUATED U'STREAM OF SILT FENCE SMALL DE RE'OVED VMEN TH' 0' 2. AS 1â‚¬CESSARY. PREASSEMBLED _SILLEENC: . %(3*5%3997*Ji.#T?.Mci?:rfil#AjBED ARIA u&&..1&2&23 ~B . ~:=1=&?T==,RE:E=â€žTIâ€ž.D VIEN ERQEILE DIKES ARâ‚¬ 10 REMAIN IN PLACE INTL TIE UPSTREAM DISTURBED AREA M EXISTS ArTER ROOVAL. IT SHALL DE SEEDED AND MULCIED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED M A MANNER ACCEPTED I THE CITY. ROCK DIKE ~ 04 ' /#'GttibEHis~'"0~'9m#6.TED Q]ICILINiIAUANQN SILT FENCE CE) r r ~ CITY OF LOVELAND STORMWATER | APPROVED: KWG DRAWING /2*LI PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CONSTRUCTION | DATE: 11/29/05 SW-10 SILT, ROCK OR WATTLE DIKE STORMWATER DRAWINGS | DRAWN BY: TBK REVISIONS Date_SEPIEMBER 11,2007 Drawn C.S.P. CLIENT SHEAR ENGINEERING CORPORATION DETAIL SHEET PROJECT No. SHEET NO. NO. OF SHEETS [Ir,tp - By Description Field Book _ Checked B.W.S. HILL COUNTRY CUSTOM HOMES 4836 SO. COLLEGE AVE, SUITE 12, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80525 DELLA TERRA MOUNTAIN CHATEAU 2303-01-07 prite _ By Description Dit p Ay Dpgrriptian Scale- 1"=1' Approved B.W.S. PHONE: (970) 226-5334 (970) 226-4451 FAX: (970) 282-0311 ESTES PARK, COLORADO DET-SHT.DWG 9 9-11-07 MC Â© 1:30 PM MEMORANDUM ESTES PARK SURVEyORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 Telephone 970-586-5175 Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX received at 970-586-5816 FROM: Paul Kochevar DATE: September 18, 2007 TO: Dave Shirk at Town of Estes Park SUBJECT: beer Ridge Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Modifications The Public Works memo of August 31 indicates: 1. we need to meet the local mountain criteria and 2. provide a turn around at the end of the drive and 3. extend the drive to Lot 4 All of the above mentioned items were discussed when the subdivision was originally approved in 2006 by the Planning Commission and the Town Board. That discussion focused upon the inordinate expense and practicality of providing these design elements in this situation and on this site. When you get to the west end of this drive you are up against a much steeper slope and a drainage that confines the drive on it's north side. Both elements limit the construction of an improved drive to the manner we have presented. The proposed drive is a much better situation than now exists. It is very safe and provides access in a manner that far exceeds anything in the neighborhood. The original approval of this subdivision accounted for these and other factors including the down zoning from multi-family to estate lot sizes. It is an extraordinary imposition to ask us to eliminate one lot in order to provide minimal improvement to the drive design already presented. The elimination of a lot is the only way we could meet this criteria. It has taken us over a year to save enough to build the drive as originally approved. An arbitrary change at this point, with such financial implications, would be devastating. Thank you for your consideration. Please let me know if moving forward as presented is a possibility. Paul Kochevar ~ Deer Ridge Subdivision Preliminary Plat ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 *I~-i-* Estes Park, CO 80517 - Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: September 18, 2007 REOUEST: Adjust the interior boundary between two lots, and subdivide the largest into three smaller lots. N LOCATION: The site is located at 1925 , aw A IA Homestead Lane, within the Town of Estes , 19 1,=Ir------/ USE Park. 36 APPLICANT/OWNER: John Skoog .4 36 - 7 B 36 Mx,*ain USFS NkÂ¢ional FAN ... STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk = USES APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Fup ax.*'y Valley Development Code (EVDC) SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers (Paul Kochevar), 586-5175 Parcel Numbers: 3522434-003, -004 Total Development Area: 7.31 acres Number of Lots: Two existing, four Existing Land Use: Single-family proposed Proposed Land Use: single family Existing Zoning: "E-1" single-family Adj:ttent Zoning- East: "A" Accommodations, "RM" Multi- North: "E-1" Estate family West: "E-1" Estate South: "E-1" Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Accommodations North: Single-Family residential West: Single-Family residential South: Single-Family residential Services- Water: Town Sewer: UTSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer "l X PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to adjust the common property line between Lots 3 and 4 of the Skoog Subdivision, and subdivide Lot 3 into three smaller lots. This subdivision review is for the preliminary plat, and is a recommendation to the Town Board. Lot 3 was formerly zoned for multi-family development, and had three tourist cabins located on it. The property was rezoned in 2003 to "E-1" Estate in conjunction with preliminary plat review. The final plat was approved, but expired prior to recordation. Therefore, the applicant has submitted a new plat for review. This plat would pave an existing drive, extend water and sewer mains into the neighborhood, and provide fire hydrants. This plat would also have the effect of "pulling" two dwelling traffic from the road at the bottom of the hill, thus helping reduce the overall traffic impact on the neighborhood. REVIEW CRITERIA: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Subdivision Design Standards. This proposal complies with minimum lot size (base of 1-acre) and width standards (100-feet) set forth in Table 4-2 of the EVDC. Density. A portion-ofthe subdivision_is located above the "blue line" water service elevation. The EVDC requires that 80% of lands located above the elevation serviceable by the Town of Estes Park water system be deducted from density calculations. In this case, there are 2.39 acres located above the service elevation; this equates to deducting 1.91 acres from the gross of 7.31 acres, for a net land area of 5.41 acres. This is sufficient for the proposed number of lots. Slope Protection and Analysis. The applicant's engineer has submitted a slope analysis for proposed Lots 1 and 2; the size of these lots has been increased accordingly. The EVDC requires that for each percentage point average slope exceeds 12%, the base zone minimum lot area shall be increased by one thousand square feet. The average slope of proposed Lot 1 is 25.2%, which equates to a minimum lot area of 1.303 acres; the average slope of proposed Lot 2 is 13.3%, which equates to a minimum lot area of 1.03 acres Grading and Site Disturbance. The proposed new lots (Lots 1 and 2) will be subject to standards set forth in Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance",which includes restoration of disturbed areas. Page #2 - Deer Ridge Preliminary Plat Detention/Stormwater Facilities. Where detention basins and other storm and erosion control facilities may be required, any adverse visual and aesthetic impacts on the natural landscape and topography shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. These details should be, included in the construction plans for the proposed detention pond. Tree and Vegetation Protection. The proposed new lots (Lots 1 and 2) will be subject to standards set forth in Section 7.3 "Tree and Vegetation Protection". Geologic and Wildfire Hazard Areas. The entire site is within a mapped "steep slope" geologic hazard area. The applicants engineer has questioned the existence of such a hazard, and has visited the site with Staff. It is Staffs opinion the engineer is correct, and suggests the Planning Commission waive the typical geologic hazard standards (which require a professional geologist prepare a report) conditional to site plans and building foundations be prepared by a licensed engineer, with an emphasis on drainage. Should blasting be required, a blast consultant should be retained. These conditions are consistent with past geologic reports we have received for similar mapped geologic hazards. Adequate Public Facilities. Approval of development is conditioned upon the provision of adequate public facilities and services necessary to serve th6 new development. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12 have been made. Sewer. Adequate sewage disposal facilities and services to support the proposed development shall be available concurrently with the impacts of such development. In this regard, the Decision-Making Body shall require that, at the time of issuance of any building permit, all necessary sewage disposal facilities and services, as described in Â§7.12.D.2 above, are in place and available to serve the new development in accordance with the approved utility plan for the development. The proposed sewer line should be routed such that it will not interfere with existing significant trees or rock outcroppings. Water. Adequate domestic water facilities and services to support the proposed development shall be available concurrently with the impacts of such development. In this regard, the Decision-Making Body shall require that, at the time of issuance of any building permit, all necessary water facilities and services, as described in Â§7.12.E.2 above, are in place and available to serve the new development in accordance with the approved utility plan for the development. Section 10.5.E "Utility Standards" requires that the subdivider install water service lines, and that "service lines shall be installed to the property line prior to the paving of the street". This will need to be included in the improvement guarantee. Page #3 - Deer Ridge Preliminary Plat Drainage/Water Quali(FÂ· Drainage facilities shall be installed and completed prior to issuance of the first building permit. Fire Protection. Adequate fire prptection facilities and services to support the proposed development shall be in place and available to serve the new development. This includes the proposed fire hydrant, which should be included in the improvement guarantee. Transportation. Pursuant to Section 7.12.H, sub 1.c, before issuance of first building permit, the cul-de-sac paving will need to be extended, as identified on the "Drive and Utility Plan". The submitted drive section has been approved as a design alternative to the width standards set forth in Appendix D. The need for a full cul-de-sac bulb has been waived (with support from the Fire Chief). This will be a private road. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision ofpublic services. Upper Thompson Sanitation District noted that plant investment fees will be collected at the time building pennits applications are routed through the District's administration office. Town Attorney White had a comment regarding the labeling of an easement. Public PForks had comments regarding the road and drainage. All of these can be addressed with the final plat. Light and Power has noted "additional underground infrastructure will be necessary at the developer's expense." Water had comments regarding the water main extension, policies and standards, construction drawings, and as-builts. These should be conditions of approval. Other. Tract "89" of the Betton BLA should be changed to "Tract 87", which is the actual lot designation. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. This proposal complies with adjusted lot size and width standards set forth in the EVDC. Page #4 - Deer Ridge Preliminary Plat 2. The site is within a mapped geologic hazard area. Staff recommends waiving the requirement for a professional geologist. 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. , 4. Pursuant to Section 3.2.E.2 "Compliance with Board's Conditions", compliance with conditions of approval shall be completed by the Applicant and submitted to Staff within thirty days of the Board's action. 5. Final plat approval is required. Submittal will require compliance with applicable sections of the EVDC, including but not limited to: Â§3.9 "Subdivisions"; Â§7.1 "Slope Protection and Analysis"; Â§7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance"; Â§7.3 "Tree and Vegetation Protection"; Â§7.12 "Adequate Public Facilities"; Â§10.5.E "Utility Standards"; Â§10.5.G.2 "Restoration of Disturbed Roadside Areas"; Â§10.5.I "Monuments"; Â§10.5.J "As-Built Drawings"; Â§10.5.K "Public Improvements"; Appendix B.II.D "Final Subdivision Plat"; and, Appendix D "Road Standards". 6. This is a Planning Commission recommendation to the Town Board. The Planning Commission will not review the subsequent final plat, which will proceed directly to the Town Board. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed preliminary plat of the "Deer Ridge Subdivision" CONDITIONAL TO: 1. The proposed sewer line shall be routed such that it will not interfere with existing significant trees or rock outcroppings. This shall be clarified on the construction drawings. 2. Compliance with memo from Upper Thompson Sanitation District to Dave Shirk dated August 21, 2007. 3. Compliance with memo from Greg White to Dave Shirk dated August 17,2007. 4. Compliance with memo from Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated August 31,2007. 5. Compliance with memo from Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated 8-20-07. Page #5 - Deer Ridge Preliminary Plat â‚¬ UPPER C ~- ,-x3921. DISTRIC10 P.O. Box 568 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 (970)-586-4544 (970) 586-1049 Fax August 21, 2007 Dave Shirk, Planner II Town of Estes Park P.O. 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Deer Ridge Subdivision Amended Plat ofLots 3 & 4, Skoog Subdivision 1825 & 1925 Homestead Lane Dear Dave, The Upper Thompson Sanitation District submits the following comments for the above referenced property: â€¢ The property is in the District and can be served by gravity. â€¢ An eight inch mainline extension from MH-F137E-4A-2, extending north between Lots 1&2 will be required. â€¢ Plant Investment and Permit fees will need to be collected at the time the building permit applications are routed through the District's administration office. â€¢ Plans to construct will need to be submitted to the District, and upon approval, a pre-construction meeting will be scheduled. â€¢ A Warrano' Agreement and an Applicationfor Acceptance must be signed before the District will allow a connection to the system. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank You, Â°-A>q ~41~ Chris Bieker Operations Manager Upper Thompson Sanitation District cc: Paul Kochevar GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 August 17, 2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Preliminary Subdivision Plat - Deer Ridge Subdivision Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Note on the "30-foot access and utility easement as shown upon the Skoog Subdivision Plat" shall be changed to read "the 30-foot private access and public utility easement." For purposes of review of this Plat, I have assumed that said 30- foot access and utility easement is a private access and public utility easement. I f you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. ~ery Truly Ygars, 02- LU ~ Gregoi~A. White GAW/ldr cc: Estes Park Survtfors, Paul Koche*al Fax: 970/586:5816 1Â£,41 Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3582, szurn@estes.org Memo TO: Dave Shirk , Planner 11 From: Scott A. Zum P.E. Director of Public Works Date: Aug 31, 2007 Re: Deer Ridge Sub Amended Plat of lots 3&4 After reviewing the Amended plat and & Deer Ridge drive and utility plan for the above referenced submittal, the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: 1. STREETS: a. The applicant is responsible for construction of the roadway and appurtances to full Town standards. These standards shall be compliant with the local mountain criteria. b. The applicant must extend the standard street section to the beginning of lot 4. The tennination of Homestead lane must provide a tum around or other adequate means of accommodating a emergency vehide tum around. The easements and hydrant location must also accommodate these modifications. c. The proposed alignment does not fall within previously plated easements. Previous plats and recorded easements are not shown correctly. Please have the applicant resubmit correct representations of the previously recorded plats and easements. d. Provide shared driveway maintenance agreement & drainage maintenance agreement. 2. DRAINAGE: a. The applicant must provide an updated drainage study in compliance with the Town and Larimer County standards. It is not dear as to how the additional impervious roadway and adjacent properties draining to the roadside ditch are being detained and meeting water quality criteria before it being released to the public ROW . b. At this time the Public Works Dept is undear as to the responsibility and ownership of these proposed drainage easements, detention areas and infrastructure. Please inform us as to what the applicant is proposing in this regard. â€¢ Page 1 *'< Note: The Public Works Dept. may have additional comments or requirements as additional detail and information is provided for review. â€¢ Page 2 Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 08-20-07 Re: Deer Ridge Subdivision, Amended plat of Lots 3 and 4, Skoog Subdivision, 1825 and 1925 Homestead Lane The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for Preliminary Subdivision Plat for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4) The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5) Easements need to accompany new lot lines in new proposed locations. 6) Easements also need to accompany all primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 7) The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 8) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 9) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 10)All primary electric must be buried 4' deep with warning tape at 2'. All secondary must be buried 2' deep with warning tape at l' in the appropriately sized conduit for the conductor. 11) We will need to meet with the developer to determine exact cost and location of proposed facilities. The developer will need to meet with the departments Line Superintendent Todd Steichen 970-586-3602 to determine electrical feed requirements for lots 3 and 4. 12) Submit plans from the project electrical engineer for Town review and approval. 1 13) We will need to know the size of each individual service, type of heat and whether or not air conditioning is being proposed. â€¢ Page 2 We, Mark & Rebecca Elrod, own a lot identified as Lot 6, Replat o f Lot 1, Homestead Subdivision, to be known as 675 Summerset Court. Our lot and Subdivision is immediately to the South of this Preliminary Subdivision Plat. We received a notification dated August 10, 2007 that the Deer Ridge Subdivision Preliminary Subdivision Plat is to be considered by the Estes Valley Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 18, 2007. We were further advised that if we had any question on the proposed request or wanted to comment on the same that we should contact you. We have recently had dealings with the Town of Estes Park Community Development Department focused on drainage issues. We understand how closely your Department follows rules and guidelines as prnvided for in the Estes Valley Development Code. No doubt in the Staff Report due out 09/04/07 you may address some of the concerns and questions we have. We noted that the Board o f Trustees meeting o fJune 28,2005 reference to the Final Subdivisions Deer Ridge Subdivision was removed from the Consent Agenda. Further in the minutes the following reference was made "Paving will assist with historic drainage problems and there were no objections to proposal during the Planning Commission meeting." (Emphasis added) This certainly puts us on note that the Board of Trustees recognized the drainage problems over two years ago. What has been done since then to elevate that concern? What kind of paving was being referenced? In reviewing the Estes Valley Development Code, Appendix B, Submittal Requirements, II, A- D we find the issues the Department must have considered. At (A) the statement of intent is to provide how the proposed subdivision meets the applicable standards for review as set forth ill Chapter 10 and Chapter 7 of the Code. Has this already been done? Have (A) and (B) been previously addressed? We are just tying to determine what stage of approval we are at currently. If (A) & (B) have been addressed then Section C (5) requires the contents to include a Vicinity Map showing relationship of the subdivision to the surrounding area, at a maximum scale of one inch equals on thousand two hundred feet (1"=1,200'). The site plan submitted here does not provide the scale as required by the Code. If the scale was increased to that mandated by the Code our entire Subdivision would be shown, including our lot. It would be helpful for the Department to have a map with the proper scale to understand the drainage issues facing close lot owners. Appendix B ([I) Â© (5) (f) indicates a map of existing conditions should be provided. It should show among other things existing significant trees vegetation and natural features such as rock outcroppings. Existing topography. When we had our hearing we were required to update our topography map. The site map submitted here carried the legend that it was from an enlarged aerial mapping of 1979. This hardly seems compliant with Code requirements or those required of us in dealing with the Department. Appendix B ([I) (C) (5) Â® the map must show location of stormwater facilities/drainage way to be reserved for public use. We are not certain that is shown on the map submitted with this request. Appendix B (C) (5) (o) requires a drainage plan. Considering the historic drainage problems previously noted by the Town Trustees ~n June 28,2005, a drainage plan would seem critical. There seems to be the need for a preliminary drainage systems design ill accordance with the Larimer County Stormwater Management Manual. When we had our hearing we had to provide factual science showing what a 100 year (flood) event would do to drainage to our lot, and surround lots. Why has this not required by the Department, and the public, for consideration? The drainage from this Subdivison would seem to impact Lot 3 and Lot 7 of our Subdivision most significantly, but without more facts and science we cannot tell what other surrounding lot owners, or those in close proximity might be at risk. We shallleave it to the Town of Estes Park Community Development Department sees that all other requirements of the Code are given attention that we may have missed or failed to have appreciation 0Â£ In Mr. Kochevar's, July 25,2007, Statement of Intent, mention is made to changes having been made to the plat to reflect the progress to-date. At numbered point 2, "A detention pond wall has been constructed at the east end of the property. All that needs to be accomplished in this are is the outlet pipe and the overflow pan. We will complete these aspects when the main drive is brought to final grade." Our question is whether the detention pond is in compliance with Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards. We are not familiar with dry detention ponds. We want to understand that it is in compliance with some regulatory authority relative to its integrity. We want to understand who has responsibility for maintenance and upkeep of the detention pond. We want to understand what issues around vegetation in the detention pond require responsibility of the lot owners or the new subdivision. We want to understand what a 100 year flood event would cause to the detention pond. What enforcement authority do surrounding property owners have available to them relative to detention ponds? Continuing in Mr. Kochevar's above referenced Statement of Intent at numbered point 3, "A concrete purb was planned on the north side of the main drive. We have decided that a properly constructed roadside swale will better control the drainage in this area." When we had our hearing more fact and science was required about our swale than our opinion. Not only did we have to show the impact of a 100 year flood even on the swale, but we had to give evidence of swale design and construction. That does not seem to be addressed here. We assume the Department.will need to have the same information required of us at our hearing to fully understand the drainage of the proposed swale on this subdivision and surrounding property owners. We thank you in advance for the consistent application of Code requirements by the Department for all applicants. We also thank you for your service to the Town and property owners of Estes Park, Colorado. Mark & Rebecca Elrod 0 Cl ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. ~ Post Office Box 3047 Telephone 970-586-5175 - Estes Park, CO 80517 Receive FAX at 970-586-5816 July 25,2007 . W.O. 2446 Mr. David Shirk Town of Estes Park Community Development P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Deer Ridge Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Statement of Intent Dear Dave: This property is located on Fall River Road near the Summerset Condominiums and the Homestead Subdivision. A final plat was approved for the property to divide it into four lots instead of the existing two lots. We stopped the process to deal with some of the improvement installations in advance of completing the platting. It is still our goal to install all the utility lines and the new drive before the final plat is completed. We have made a few changes to this plat to reflect some of the progress to-date: 1. The drive serving lot 3 and lot 4 has been relocated - an easement has been added to cover the new location. We have also prepared an easement agreement between John Skoog and ourselves to address this easement as well as the drive that commences at Summerset Court. 2. A detention pond wall has been constructed at the east end of the property. All that needs to be accomplished in this area is the outlet pipe and the overflow pan. We will complete these aspects when the main drive is brought to final grade. 3. A concrete curb was planned on the north side of the main drive. We have decided that a properly constructed roadside swale will better control the drainage in this area. It will handle a higher flow volume without reducing the drives ability to safely carry vehicular traffic. 4. All of the small cabins that existed on Lot 3 have now been removed except the most northerly cabin next to the north lot line. During the last Planning process this property was rezoned to E-1 Estate. The goal when this went through the process was to eliminate the potential of multi-family housing on the property. This is still our objective. The proposed lots meet the requirements of the E-1 zoning district. The lots will have access to sewer, water and electric lines which we will be extended. The attached construction drawings indicate the details of the proposed drive and utility line installations. ISO calculations are also attached. If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully yours, Esteg,pprk Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. D EÂ©EUX-#El -rÂ«tnÂ«~Â«*j~ - [11 JUL 25 ~ =D Paul M. Kothevar, P.E. & P.L.S. ,. President ' 5 116#13 9EJ , ESTES VALLEY l '-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION < JUL 2 5 2007 -Submittal Date: 11 r Development Plan f " Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map F,- Special Review B-â€ž' ROW or Easement Vacation F Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition F" Street Name Change F"' Final Map 9 Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension f'" Supplemental Map N Final Subdivision Plat C'" Other: Please specify f"" Minor Subdivision Plat F Amended Plat General Information Project Name Deer Ridge Subdivision Project Description Amended Plat of Lot 3 & Lot 4, Skoog Subdivision Project Address 1825 Homestead Lane & 1925 Homestead Lane Legal Description Lot 3 and Lot 4, Skoog Subdivision 3%-aq 34 00 3 Parcel ID # 351-33Â·\3400 4 Section 22 Township 5N Range 73W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 7.31 Existing Land Use Residential Proposed Land Use Same Existing Water Service 9 Town i~ Well i~ Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service F Town i Well i Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service -- EPSD 9 UTSD F- Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service r EPSD 9 UTSD i Septic Is a sewer lift station required? . Yes 9 No Existing Gas Service 9 Xcel i"* Other , None Existing Zoning E-1 Proposed Zoning E-1 Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? i Yes w No M'.-I Has sit@ staking been completed? j Yes 1 No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Paul Kochevar Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments F"' Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan P Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Type-oT-Application |||| Primary Contatt Person is r Owner â€ž"I i Applicant %4 Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) Paul M. & Katherine M. Kochevar Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone 970-586-5175 Cell Phone Fax 970-586-5816 Email PAUL0971@JUNO.COM Record Owner(s) John A. Skoog Mailing Address 224 S. 85th Street, Omaha, NE 68114 Phone 970-577-1712 Cell Phone Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. .@IEÂ©[E OVE-F Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, CO 80517 i l Phone 970-586-5175 Al JUL 2 5 = I L Cell phone J U. I.20 Fax 970-586-5816 - Email PAUL0971@JUNO.COM APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met- Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT.- -liU Sldeo C Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT: 44[vi M -Acited AA tures: Record Owner U JL Date 1/14 (67 I , Record Owner 1 <66;Atet.iu _ Date 7/10/b 7- . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION~- â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,-. and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I l acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) 1 Ul IUQI Dld, IU l, Icll 414(*plat lut, Ul Â£111.3 dpplitall..11 1,y LI IC; 1 U WI I Ul CD Le.0 r (11 A IU, lilil ly dl IU I CL.t; Ipl Ul li 10 C:~.~111,..CE lil,11 It,t# â€¢ by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. $ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. * The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. 1 21UU IUWIWUyt# U lell 1 1 12:Ve I WUe,VOU ll le Cbleb V diley LJOVWIUpll lei ll rft#VitiW AppllUCILIUI I OUI It:UU le 211 IU U lell 1211 IUI e LU I meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT.- 140164 â‚¬ teÂ» Record Owner PLEASE PRINT.Â· 44-0 u VA yed* U AA Signatures: Record Owner It Al Dde 1 /t..l' f~07 Record Owner Date 9Â«44<1 -< -#1 | JUL 2 5 20[17 ~ Revised 10/13/06 /1 .-/ B h h toÂ¥- TA C:Loi65=tz E~~ ~ ~ 9(010 10 OLD LO to %42Egagm 0000 OrA m C - co CD-COM 00 moo U 00 52 LO a 00 E 0 0 Lu Q g g 00 n 000 -O 0 g co O 9 g o 3 0 NOOLOZZU -03000%030-'fOMÂ©OOK 4- O 2-2 8 2/ 2*-28 &q * â‚¬~ ig*-f-0.20 E--- rk- i O u o- F- iâ‚¬ â‚¬â‚¬ ji fE il J~ fs -Â£ 11 0~ fE M 2* *F *I li fE 1N fE 4I jl Am 2- fi- 2 #6 2 e Lf E 22 >.9) CES Notiavt (DE 02 422 e =82 E ~ ~~* E m EN * g 0 0 m '~ (6 0 w 1- = (0 w :C O 'Di 0 > 0 > 0.- co m (0 0) 0 (0 0 (D (1) -0; 2 -0 ti O LULLIm LLI $(OLLICD(DO W S LLUI WOLLI OWMNLU U) a U.10 WJZ LLI< LL U.1 E NE , 8 r (D 8 0 5 0 0 %-EXCM:36 0== 0~ 3 AN (11- m c a) a) > 0 *ti# 11% FME, 8 -8 & 00 0 CO m g .2 O--=0-' -2 8 m ./ 2 0 j# 12 i 5%%*Ei % 056 = co .Li %%213Â£,magme'*32,0== cy=Em=E:235 282â€ž242~E*2 2 ~ ~0232802~0 ~ $2820 ~0362% 4 (D LO G) ,- O- 00 - CO ,- A - C\1 C\1 0- CD ,- CD h O. r CU O. 1.0 tO ,- LO O- 00 91- A IN C\1 - 3 2 (D C g 0 CS U. 0 R & 33 CI . 0 0 O c E 0 2 0 2 5 < % -1 - 81Â£ J.Â¤ 20 & - 0 0 4 co- 2 -5 11< : MEEP 4 3 c D -92 m ELI. ~ g b A- 0 , g 0 53 g v A5, Sc/5-~pr.2 62.9 2 U.i Â·> Â¤- ~ (6 Â§Â£:3-= ii~-;gEE@8~5 4#1~ E~EN~ E EU- 59 2 0 a,4Mâ‚¬*ENc f i A 9 0 2.C E,E a g %EE@52 gE ~%123E280 hj-* 4 Se. 2 m Ed liti ~g 06 LLI A -i Omz~Scfccofe~-SBS .W t < 0 2 2 Â® z hi ini<ijHH H.<id j 2 22 5/22 5 g. 2 0 - C co Â£6 0 @ N Â£ Â£ H 0 2 O ODIFJOUOOMOaaLL~U-lacrIO> Mark Vincent 11 E. B~y,~a~b~~~Drive #2D FL 33154 E Et-DE LOZ Robert & Noreen Baker merset Court 80517 Ann Davies O 80104 66213 ays, Trustees ,/th Terrace , KS 66223 c/o Shirley O 80517 20999 80692 X ;Srul luewe6euevy 82092 Xl 'P SAUCI XEMpOO ounseM uux-1 80517 Z L908 03 oul 'u0!WPOSSÂ¥ ein Z LSÂ°8 Â°t~Ted Peol Je 'OUI 'Je/\!8 11 Owner 11 ity, State, 9 Lâ‚¬99 S>1 'ex ZloON M euuezns 9*8*-90008 OO 'e 11 River Road, LLC , Suite 200 gs Drive /errock Circle c/o Steve Burbach Homestead Lane Steven Burbach Life Estate Street peoh' lood elle 1.InOO JeA!El lied uieM uueop 0/0 lEi Iled uo lesia zabe Betton, Trustees unity Non-Profit Corp. ZOOE qnS eJd 86Ply Jeea eer Mountain TRACT 96B, FALL RIVER ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT El ESTATE ZONING DEER RIDGE SUBDIVISION FOUND - 1/2" DIA. REBAR WITH ~ PLASTIC CAP NO. 15760 1 OF LOT 3 AND LOT 4, SKOOG SUBDIVISION TRANSFORME F~~'0360," LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 22, T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.Ivl., (S 78'03 00 E 269.13*) - 1/2 DIA. REBAR WITH TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO PLASTIC CAP NO.9485 TRACT 96A, FALL RIVER ADDITION ~ 5....1 /. 1 / +1.1 / I ,)<1 4% <4- 1.- / / \ / .\24*\ -1 -- I -7870- .- 1 1 --*. 10' --- . S 78'ni'- 1 1>4392\ 1 (S 78*03'00" E a' DRAINAGE FROM NEW IMPROVEMENTS 4 AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. NG MAT BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE f OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO ;CALE too 200 I. T-1 fL ORS & ENGINEERS, INC. 2007 URVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. FIRST NATIONAL BANK BLDG. SUITE 204 (970) 586-5175 SUBDIVISION CHECKED BY: JOHN A. SKOOG 224 SOUTH 85TH ST OMAHA, NE 68114 (402) 393-2646 , 1 111 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 b -Â£-2 1/1 1 U 1 1 Vtll k 1 1 1/11 1 .11.Ll. 1 VIâ€¢ 1 PROJECT NO: 2446 01 : - .. 0 ' ..0 .1 . . I .: . .. .. ... I C. 0 I .. . - . 4, .. e . .. . . 1 I . I ./ . . . ... , A 6 S . 7 ... 0 0 .: 0 0 . . : D . 1 - A I. 1: 1 0 .. . D ... .. . 0 . 00 0 . .. 0 . . 0 - .. : I : : A:* 10 1 . A .=-ID 1 AD . , . . . .. A . I. A . 0 . .. . 1 . 0 1. .. . .. . . . 4 I. 0 ... I . . . .0 0 4 A ... . A. I . .. 0 - ...... .... 0 .. . 0 ......... 0 . . . 4 :G .. . A .. . 0 .0 A . ... . 0 . D .. . 0, , r 0 0 .. . 0. D .. . I. .... .... - % 1 I / 4 : 1 . ... ..2 . . . - . - . I. i : r-'..=4 . i . 0 : . 1.. . 0 5 1,0 .. ...lilli' 0 . 0 ..0 , I ' . .. .0 . .. I ... - . U. 1 . I . 22 I. . . . 0 . .. 00 : el, I .. . I . - ... I . . I I 0 . 4 ...1 1 D. : 0 .. . . .. - . 0. .... .. 0 1.. '' . . . 0 . 0 0 0 . f ... . 0 0 0. . I. 0 0 0 . %" :00 ..., 0 . 0. 00 . 4 0.0 ..0 0 , ; . 0 . 0. a /:I . .A E . 2 4 . . 0 .. . . , . 1 . . D.. I G 0 1 . 1. I :.. .. 1 : 0 . . I I -0 1 .... D . , 0 -0 :.. .. D. a . . 0 - .:.. , 0 . .0. ... 0 I .... - 1* . 7 1 . ...0 0 '': I . . . 0 . - . .. 0 0 " 0 ... . @ ~ECEIVEn .AL . .... 1 641 1 4*4/4 D ..1 . 01 0 1 ... . .D -. . .. Â»14 f / lA .0 01 22 . . D ...... 0 - ... D . 00 2. 0 1 .. lillillillillillillilli:lilit/;illill : DA k 0. ./. ki k . I .. . ~ Amendments to the Estes Valley ~ Development Code, Block Ten Additions ~ Estes Park Community Development Department ~ Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue -* PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: September 18, 2007 TITLE: Additional amendments to the Estes a RMÂ· i 1/04 Valley Development Code, Block Ten 9 , -il.-- 8--, A.1 4 .57 REQUEST: To make a number of changes *- I and corrections to the adopted Estes Valley ROCI'y 34 Ah,Â·1*n USFS Development Code. NMional m* i. LOCATION: Estes Valley, inclusive of the - = lEI=S Town of Estes Park. Rlvt\IP 8/./.I APPLICANT: Estes Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: These Code revisions address the following: 1) Section 3.1 General Provisions 2) Section 3.2 Standard Development Review Procedure ORGANIZATION: 1. Text to be replaced delineated with strikethrough (abc do fghi jk Imn op qrstuv w 2. New text delineated with underline (abc de fahi ik Imn op arstuv w xyz). 3. Revisions have been organized sequentially by chapter and section. ITEM 1: Â§3.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS D. Required Times for Action and Inaction 5. Extension of Times. Time frames for action on all land use applications, includina, but not limited to, development plans, subdivisions, PUD applications, rezonings, special reviews, use classifications, and separate lot determinations mav be temporarily extended bv the Community Development Director or his designee due the lack of adequate staff in the Community Development Department for timely review, receipt of an above average number of applications for a review period, or anv other factor which prevents adequate and timely review of all land use applications to meet the required times for action. The extension shall be for a period of time necessary to enable the Community Development Department to adequately review the land use applications hot to exceed sixty davi The extension shall be in writing and posted in the Community Development Office and on the Town's website. W ~acancv of more than three weeks in Planning staffing due to personnel bhanctes, medical leave, or other FMLA authorized absence shall be considered hdequate grounds for an Extension of Time under this provisiond Include parameters - define how and why Include a 60 day maximum ITEM 2: Â§3.2 STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE H. Alternative Review Procedure. The Community Development Department mav adopt a policy providing for an alternative review procedure for any applicant who wishes to use said procedure. The purpose of the alternative review procedure is to have review of an applicant's land use application conducted bv an outside consultant designated bv Staff. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees and costs associated with this alternative review procedure. The recording of any Development Plan, Final Subdivision Plat, Final Condominium Map, or PUD Plat shall not occur until all fees and costs have been paid in full. 1. Applicability. The following land use applications shall be available for the Alternative Review Procedure: zoning map amendments, subdivisions and condominiums, PUD developments, special review uses, and development plans. 2. Initiation of Alternative Review Procedure. At the time or within ten (10) davs of a pre-application conference, an applicant mav elect to use the Alternative Review Procedure. This election shall be made in writing and delivered to the Communitv Development Department within said ten (10) dav period. r 1 3. Selection of Consultant. The Community Development Director, or his designee, shall select an appropriate consultant from a list of consultants maintained bv the Community Development Department for the application. Said desianation shall be in the sole discretion of the Community Development Department and not the applicant. The consultant shall be selected within five (5) business davs of receipt of the notice of election of the Alternative Review Procedure from the applicant. 4. Fees. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees and costs charged bv the consultant including, but not limited to, fees for attendance at all meetings of the Estes Valley Planning Commission, the Board of Trustees, or the Larimer County Commissioners at which the land use application is on the agenda. The fees shall be the hourly rate charged bv the consultant. The Community Development Department shall provide the applicant with the applicable hourly rate at the time of designation of the consultant. Seventy-five percent (75%) of the application fee collected bv the Town at the time of application shall be credited toward the fees of the consultant. All other fees and costs incurred bv the applicant in the Alternative Review Procedure shall be paid to the Town of Estes Park prior to the recording of anv subdivision plat, PUD approval final condominium map, or development plan. If all fees and costs are not paid within sixty (60) davs of the invoicing of said costs and fees to the applicant, the land use application shall be null and void. No application for the Darcel of property subiect to the terminated application shall be processed bv the Community Development Department until all fees and costs have been paid in full. Also, no building permits or other property use approvals shall be issued or processed for the parcel until all fees and costs have been paid in full. 5. Timing. Review of all land use applications pursuant to the Alternative Review Procedure shall be in accordance with all of the terms and conditions of the Estes Valley Development Code includina the time frames set forth in the Code for review. Â§ 4.3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C. Density/Dimensional Standards. 5. Table 4-2: Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts. Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Building/Structure Minimum Lot Propirt, Line Setbacks Max. Min. Standards [1] [2] [4] [9] Building Building Max. Lot 1Max. Net Zoning Density Area (sq Width Side Rear Height Width Coverage District (units/acre) ft) (ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) [10] (ft.) (%) RE-1 1/10 Ac. 10 Ac. 200 50 50 50 30 20 Wa RE 1/2.5 Ac. 2.5 Ac. 200 50 50 50 30 20 n/a E-1 1 1 Ac.[3] 100 25 25 25 30 20 rda 25-arterials; E 2 1/2 Ac. [3] 75 15-other 10 15 30 20 rda streets 25-arterials; R 4 44 Ac. 60 15-other 10 15 30 20 n/a streets R-1 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 Wa Single- family = 25-arterials; Duplex = R-2 4 18,000; 60 15-other 10 10 30 20 50% Duplex= streets 27,000 40,000, Residential 5,400 sq. 60; Uses: ft./unit Lots Max = 8 and [4] [5] [8] Greater 25-arterials; RM Multi- Min = 3 10 Ord. 18- Senior than 15-other 10 30 20 [7] family= Senior [6] 01 #14) Institutiona 100,000 streets 50% Institutional 1 Living sq. ft.: Living Uses: Uses: 14 200 Max = 24 Ac. Notes to Table 4-2: [1] (a) See Chapter 4, Â§4.3.D, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for single-family residential subdivisions that are required to set aside private open areas per Chapter 4, Â§4.3.D. 1. (b) See Chapter 11, Â§11.3, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for clustered lots in open space developments. (c) See Chapter 11, Â§11.4, which allows a reduction in minimum lot size (area) for attainable housing. (d) See Chapter 7, Â§7.1, which requires an increase in minimum lot size (area) for development on steep slopes. (Ord. 2-02 Â§1) [2] See Chapter 7, Â§7.6 for required setbacks from stream/river corridors and wetlands. (Ord. 2-02 #5; Ord. 11-02 Â§1) [3] If private wells or septic systems are used, the minimum lot area shall be 2 acres. See also the regulations set forth in Â§7.12, "Adequate Public Facilities." [4] Townhome developments shall be developed on parcels no smaller than 40,000 square feet; however, each individual townhome unit may be constructed on a minimum 2,000-square-foot lot at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. [5] Multi-family developments shall also be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of.30. [6] Zero side-yard setbacks (known as "zero lot line development") are allowed for townhome developments. [7] Minimum building width requirements shall !121 apply to mobile homes located in a mobile home park. [8] Single-family and duplex developments shall have minimum lot areas of 18,000 s.f. and 27,000 s.f, respectively. (Ord 18-01 #14) [9] All structures shall be set back from public or private roads that serve more than four adiacent or off-site dwellings or lots. The setback shall be measured from the edge of public or private roads, ef the edge of the dedicated right-of-way or recorded easement, or the property line, whichever produces a greater setback. The setback shall be the same as the applicable minimum building/structure setback. This setback is not applicable in the "MF" district. (Ord. 11-02 Â§1) [10] See Chapter 1, Â§ 1.9.E, which allows an increase in the maximum height of buildings on slopes. (Ord. 18-02 #3)