Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2007-07-17
- F-/LE- Ceq _ Prepared: July 11, 2007 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 17, 2007 id:06 p.m. Study Session. Rooms 201 and 20% Town Hall 1:30 p.m. Meeting, Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated June 19, 2007 b. Preliminary Subdivision Plat, Grueff-Edwards Subdivision, Lot 4, Stanley Historic District, Lot4ED, LLC/Applicant - Withdrawn by Applicant c. Development Plan 07-09, Stone Bridge Condominiums, Metes & Bounds Property located at 1043 Fish Creek Road, Rock Castle Development Co./Applicant - Request continuance to August 21, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting 3. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN/LOCATION & EXTENT REVIEW-SPECIAL REVIEW 06-01A, ESTES PARK 1MEDICAL CENTER, Hospital Addition, 555 Prospect Avenue Applicant: Park Hospital District Request: Amend existing development plan to allow emergency department addition and renovation Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott / Bob Joseph 4. PROPOSED BLOCK 10 AMENDMENTS TO ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Section 4.3.C.5, Table 4-2, Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts, regarding floor area ratio and lot coverage applicability; Section 7.1, Slope Protection Standards, regarding development on steep slopes; Section 7.2, Grading and Site Disturbance, regarding site disturbance standards; Section 7.11, Off-Street Parking and Loading, regarding location of guest parking spaces; Section 7.11.0.5, Basins and Drainage Facilities, regarding Larimer County Stormwater Control Manual applicability; Section 10.4.A.2 regarding lot width, Section 10.5.H, Exemptions, regarding exemption for review of two-unit condominium projects; Appendix D.1, General, regarding the Larimer County Road Standards Manual applicability; and Appendix D, General Site Access, regarding driveway design 5. REPORTS 6. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Estes Valley Planning Commission The next scheduled meeting will be held Tuesday, August 21, 2007. There are currently seven items on the agenda. You can view information about all current submittals, including next month's Planning Commission items, on our web page: www. estesnet.com/comdev/Cu rrentRequests. aspx ~ Amendments to the Estes Valley ~ Development Code, Block Ten ~ Estes Park Community Development Department ~ Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~~"""""* PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: July 17, 2007 TITLE: Amendments to the Estes Valley a - i 1/4 Development Code, Block Ten ~ USFS REQUEST: To make a number of changes k ..._1 er*- . , and corrections to the adopted Estes Valley R]Cll 716 I KIblntain *~ L.SFS '&*,oral Development Code. FAN U-L - LOCATION: Estes Valley, inclusive of the „~ Town of Estes Park. = LEFS RIVNP 1 82-Jary APPLICANT: Estes Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: These Code revisions address the following: 1) Section 7.1 "Slope Protection Standards" 2) Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance" 3) Section 7.11 "Off-Street Parking and Loading" 4) Section 10.4.A2 5) Appendix D "General Site Access" ORGANIZATION: 1. Text to be replaced delineated with strikethrough (abc do fghi jk Imn op qrstuv w *y2). 2. New text delineated with underline (abc de fqhi ik Imn op arstuv w xvz). 3. Revisions have been organized sequentially by chapter and section. P 4 ITEM 1: § 4.3.C.5 TABLE 4-2: BASE DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Minimum Lot Building/Structure Setbacks Max. Min. Standards [l] I L Max. Net Building Building 44*44.01 [2] [4] [9] Zoning Density Area (sq Width Side Rear Height Width 4.ope,%*Me' District (units/acre) ft) (ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) [10] (ft.) +,= I RE-1 1/10 Ac. 10 Ac. 200 50 50 50 30 20 Wa RE 1/2.5 Ac. 2.5 Ac. 200 50 50 50 30 20 Wa E-1 1 1 Ac.[3] 100 25 25 25 30 20 Wa 25-arterials; E 2 h Ac. [3] 75 15-other 10 15 30 20 Wa streets 25-arterials; R 4 94 Ac. 60 15-other 10 15 30 20 Wa streets R-1 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 Wa Single- family = 25-arterials; R-2 4 18,000; 60 15-other 10 10 30 20 Deple_ 60% Duplex= streets 27,000 40,000, 5,400 sq. Residential ft./unit 60; Uses: [4]454 [8] Lots Max = 8 and Senior Greater 25-arterials; RM Min = 3 10 Ord. 18- Instituti than 15-other 10 30 20 [7] 01 #14) Senior [6] Institutional onal 100,000 streets sq. ft.: Living Uses: Living 200 Max = 24 Uses: 1/2 Ac. Notes to Table 4-2: [5] &4~*familt#evelepmeme All development, except development of one single-family dwelling on a single lott shall also be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of.30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%. 111 r : ITEM 2: § 7.1 SLOPE PROTECTION STANDARDS B. Development Restrictions on Steep Slopes. 1. Applicability. These development restrictions shall apply to all new development in the Estes Valley, except for development on lots that woro approved for singlo-family residential use prior to tho offoctivo dato of this Ge€le. (Ord. 18-02 #1) Development on lots that were approved for single- family use prior to the effective date of this Code see also Section 7.7 "Geologic and Wildfire Hazard Areas." 2. New Structures-Existing Slopes in Excess of Thiny Twenty Percent. a. New development proposed to be built on any portion of a site containing a slope of tl:144 twenty percent (30 2Q°/o) or greater shall be subject to Staff review and approval of a development plan pursuant to §3.8 of this Code. This provision applies to development that would otherwise be exempt from the development plan review process (o.g., single family developments containing loss than throo [3] units). b. Staff shall review all such development plans and evaluate them according to the following standards: (1) Site disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable (see §7.2.D, "Limitations on Site Disturbance" below); (2) Cuts for utilities and access driveways shall be shared to the maximum extent feasible; (3) To the maximum extent feasible, new construction shall not take place on any portion of a parcel that shows evidence of slope instability, landslides, avalanche, flooding or other natural or manmade hazards (see §7.7, "Geologic and Wildfire Hazard Areas" below); (4) The Applicant shall demonstrate that the slope's ground surface and subsurface are not unstable, that the proposed development will not cause instability or increase the potential for slope failure, and that the development of the slope will not increase the degree of hazard both on-site and on adjacent properties. c. For purposes of this subsection, steepness of slope shall be measured from the points with highest and lowest elevation within five (5) feet of any portion of the proposed structure. 3. Structure Clearance from Steep Slopes. Structure clearance from ascending or descending slopes greater than thifty twenty percent (30 22%) shall comply with the requirements set forth in the applicable Building Code provisions. 4. Grading, Clearing and Excavation-Slopes in Excess of Thiny Twentv Percent. Clearing, excavation and grading on slopes greater than ttliFty twenty percent (30 20°/o) would not be allowed, unless expressly approved through a development plan. 5. Roads/Driveways-Slopes in Excess of *liny Twenty Percent. Shared driveways and access to sites or lots containing slopes in excess of thifty 1 twenty percent (30 20%) shall be utilized to the maximum extent feasible. See also "General Site Access" and "Intersection and Driveway Visibility" in Appendix D. (Ord. 8-05 #1) ITEM 3: § 7.2 GRADING AND SITE DISTURBANCE STANDARDS A. Applicability. 1_These grading and site disturbance standards shall apply to all new development in the Estes Valley, except for single family residential development on a lot created and approved for such use prior to the effective date of this Codo. (Ord. 18-02 #1; Ord. 8-05 #1) 2. These standards mav restrict building location and associated drivewavs to a location that results in the highest degree of compliance with these standards, thereby minimizing site disturbance. ITEM 4: § 7.11 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING F. Location. 1. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Section, required off-street parking spaces shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the principal use. (See Off-Street Parking Alternatives, §7.11.G below.) 2. In all nonresidential zoning districts except the CH district, off-street parking shall not be located within the required front yard setback area. In the CD district, off-street parking shall also not be located between the lot line and the building line parallel to an arterial or collector street. See also §4.4.D.3, "Vehicular Access and Circulation Requirements." 3. All off-street parking areas shall be separated from arterial street property lines by a landscaped buffer area at least twenty-five (25) feet wide, and from other street property lines by a landscaped buffer area at least fifteen (15) feet wide. See §7.5.F, "Buffering and Screening," and Figure 7-9 above. 4. See §7.6.F for required parking areas setbacks from delineated river/stream corridors and wetlands. 5. Parking for single-family and two-family dwellings may be located in residential driveways (excluding RV's and boats). 5. Guest Parking. Drivewavs mav not be counted toward the quest parking requirements. Guest parking shall be located to provide convenient access to all units and shall be dispersed throughout the site. ITEM 5: §7.11.0.5 BASINS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES Basins and Drainage Facilities. A\\ basin and drainage facilities shall comply with the Larimer County Stormwater Control Manual, as amended, and the standard drawings and specifications contained or referenced therein. ITEM 6: § 10.4.A2 2. Lot width shall comply with standards set forth in Tables 4-2 and 4-5. Flaapole lots shall comply with Section 10.4AC, and shall be no less than thirty (30) feet at the front lot line or seventy-five (75) feet at the building line, or such greater width as may be required by this Code. ITEM 7: § 10.5.H. CONDOMINIUMS, TOWNHOUSES AND OTHER FORMS OF AIRSPACE OWNERSHIP, 3. EXEMPTIONS Exemptions. This subsoction shall not apply to condominium projects of two (2) units or locs. The number of units shall include any units reserved for future dovolopmont. ITEM 8: Appendix D.I.A. STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION Standards of construction not otherwise specified hereunder shall be according to the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction of the Colorado Department of Highways (latest edition, with amendments in effect at that time), Town of Estes Park Right-of-Way Permit Construction Guidelines, Larimer County Access Policy, Larimer County Urban Street Standards and Larimer County Road Standards, as amended. Quality control testing shall meet the minimums as described in "Other Standards." 1 ITEM 9: Appendix D.111. GENERAL SITE ACCESS B. Driveway Access - General Standards. 1. Safe Access Required. Safe, convenient and adequate access to individual buildings by driveways shall be provided. Driveway access to collector and arterial streets shall be discouraged. No driveway shall be so located as to create a hazard to pedestrians or motorists, e#-49 invite or compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements, or block or alter access to adioining properties or uses. To the maximum extent feasible, new driveways shall align directly across from existing driveways. (Ord. 8-05 #1) 9. Driveway Design Requirements. (Ord. 8-05 #1) a. All driveways serving eight (8) or more parking spaces shall be paved and constructed with a minimum edge radius of five (5) feet on both sides, and shall be surfaced with at least two (2) inches of bituminous paving material or four (4) inches of concrete. (Ord. 8-05 #1) b. All driveways serving twenty (20) or more parking spaces shall be paved and designed and constructed meeting the standards applicable to a public street. (Ord. 8-05 #1) £ Where garages are used to satisfy parking requirements, the driveway apron shall be at least twentv feet in length unless it is demonstrated the design will not interfere with adioininq traffic movements. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS t___1 Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission June 19, 2007, 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Betty Hull; Commissioners Wendell Amos, Ike Eisenlauer, Bruce Grant, Joyce Kitchen, Doug Klink, and John Tucker Attending: Chair Hull; Commissioners Amos, Eisenlauer, Kitchen, Klink, and Tucker Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott, Planner Shirk, Town Board Liaison Homeier, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Commissioner Grant Chair Hull called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence of the meeting. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission minutes dated May 15, 2007. b. AMENDED PLAT, Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision, and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision, Gay G. Curlin/Owner, Van Horn Engineering/Applicant- Request to adjust the boundary line between two lots from an east-west orientation to a northwest-southeast orientation c. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, Kearney Subdivision, Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant-Request withdrawn by applicant d. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-01, Kearney Mini Storage, Proposed Lot 2, Kearney Subdivision, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant-Request withdrawn by applicant It was moved and seconded (Eisenlauer/Klink) that the consent agenda be accepted, and the motion passed unanimously. 3. AMENDED PLAT, Proposed Park Lane Subdivision, Lots 9,10,11,12, & a Portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park, 205 Park Lane, Applicant: Zach Wheatley Chair Hull stated the request has been withdrawn by the applicant. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-08, Park Lane Development, Proposed Lot 1, Park Lane Subdivision, 205 Park Lane, Applicant: Zach Wheatley Chair Hull stated the request has been withdrawn by the applicant. mill I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 June 19, 2007 5. MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT, WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION, Metes and Bounds Property, North End Storage Addition, 1775 Wildfire Road, Owner: Ronald J. Gordon, Applicant: Longs Peak Development, LLC, and REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05-08A, Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Wildfire Subdivision, TBD Wildfire Road, Owner: Ronald J. Gordon, Applicant: Longs Peak Development, LLC Planner Shirk provided the staff report for these two proposals. In the fall of 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved a rezoning from CO-Commercial Outlying to CH-Commercia/ Heavy for the property; the Estes Valley Planning Commission also approved a development plan (#05-08) for mini-storage units at that time. The lot was subsequently annexed to the Town of Estes Park, therefore, the Town Board of Trustees will be the final decision-making body for the subdivision request. The minor subdivision plat is a request to divide one lot into two separate lots. Lot 1 is proposed to be 1.2 acres; Lot 2 is proposed to be 0.9 acres. The subdivision plat will dedicate a common access drive for the two lots, which will be gated and locked at night, as well as dedicating drainage and utility easements. Staff recommends the applicant be required to extend Wildfire Road to the western boundary of Lot 1 as a condition of approval. The purpose of the request to amend the development plan is to allow Ertl Mechanical to purchase the property and relocate their business to Lot 2. At the time the property was rezoned from CO to CH, its use was restricted to that shown in the development plan 05- 08 for North End Storage (mini-storage units). Any change in land use requires review and approval of the governing body, thus the Town Board will be the decision-making body for the requested change-of-use to allow the building materials/storage operation (Ertl Mechanical). The amended development plan also includes an addition to the north side of the existing warehouse/storage building; relocation of the existing residence from its current location on proposed Lot 1 to the southeast portion of Lot 2; designation of this residence as an employee housing unit, which will be subject to a restrictive covenant; and omission of the line of mini-storage units formerly proposed along the easternmost property line. The deed restriction on the residence will limit its use to that of the owner, operator, or caretaker of the property; the deed restriction will be in effect for a period of twenty years. The well that currently serves the residence will be abandoned; the residence will be served by Town water and Upper Thompson Sanitation District. The amended development plan proposes stormwater drainage for the northern portion of the properly be directed into a small detention pond in the northeastern corner and drainage for the southern portion of the site be directed to the southeast corner. Staff recommends the drainage plan be revised, and further recommends it be reviewed and approved by the Public Works department prior to the Town Board hearing on this proposal. When the North End Storage development plan 05-08 and rezoning were originally proposed, many neighboring property owners expressed concern about the hours of operation. A bread-distribution business that uses the warehouse/storage building had been conducting their business beginning at 2:00 a.m. The approved development plan restricted all hours of operation on the property from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The applicant is requesting that the hours of operation be amended to allow operations to begin at 6:30 a.m. Staff recommends approval of this requested change, provided that the change applies solely to Lot 2 and operations prior to 8:00 a.m. are restricted to be within enclosed structures. This request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Comments were received from Town Attorney White, Town of Estes Park Water Department and Public Works Department, and Upper Thompson Sanitation District. No comments were received from neighboring property owners. Planning staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision plat and revised development plan 05-08A. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 June 19, 2007 Public Comment: Paul Kochevar, Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers, was present to represent Ertl Mechanical and Longs Peak Development. He stated the applicant has reviewed planning staff's recommended conditions of approval and is in agreement with them. He stated the revised development plan provides approximately 1500 square feet less building area, and that moving the residence will be better for adjacent property owners at Vista Ridge than the previously proposed storage units at that location. Chair Hull noted the applicant's statement of intent refers to storage buildings that will be taupe and beige, with tan roofs and green doors and stated the existing buildings on the site are light beige with red doors and white roofs. She questioned when the property fencing and landscaping would be installed and also expressed concern about trailers that have been stored on the site; the current development plan prohibits any outside storage on the site. Karl Ertl of Ertl Mechanical stated the trailers will be moved. Privacy fencing and plantings are in the bidding process; work should begin soon. Landscaping will be irrigated. He confirmed that any work on Lot 2 that will begin between the hours of 6:30 and 8:00 a.m. will be conducted inside the warehouse/storage building. Adjoining property owner Linda Edmondson, 865 Crabapple Lane, a resident of Vista Ridge, questioned whether the bread-distribution company will continue to operate from the warehouse/storage building, questioned the stone fence that is being installed, and expressed concern that moving the residence will block neighbors' views. Discussion followed among Commissioners, planning staff, Town Board Liaison Homeier, Mr. Kochevar, Mr. Ertl, and Ms. Edmondson, and is summarized as follows: • The bread-distribution company began operating out of the warehouse/storage building prior to the construction of Vista Ridge. The current lease expires in March 2008. • The Board of County Commissioners' conditions of approval for rezoning the property limited use of the property to that specified in the approved development plan 05-08 for North End Storage (use for mini-storage units). The bread company operations on the site appear to be grandfathered until the expiration of their current lease. However, if operations continue beyond March 2008, it will be considered a change in land use and will require the applicant to apply for and receive approval of the governing body (Estes Valley Planning Commission and/or Town Board) through a public hearing process. • The proposed plumbing business use (Ertl Mechanical) falls under the Estes Valley Development Code use definition of Building Materials/Services. • Moving the residence will reduce impact on neighbors' views because a line of mini-storage units was previously planned for that location. • The "stone fence" Ms. Edmondson referred to is part of the stormwater drainage structure. Trees will be planted as a buffer between this structure and the adjoining property. • Conditions #1 and #15 were discussed and added to the conditions of approval for the revised development plan. • Revised development plan condition #6 (#5 in the staff report) was amended to specify the building to which it applies. • Mr. Ertl indicated his agreement with the added/amended conditions. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Tucker) to recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision Plat for Wildfire Subdivision, a Metes and Bounds property in the North End Storage Addition addressed 1775 Wildfire Road, to the Town Board of Trustees, and the motion passed unanimously. CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of Development Plan 05-08A, "Amended Development Plan of North End Storage/Ertl Mechanical." 2. Compliance with memo from Jeff Boles to Bob Goehring dated 5/22/2007. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 June 19, 2007 3. The applicant shall extend Wildfire Road to the western property line. This road extension shall comply with Town road-design requirements, and shall include six-foot- wide roadside shoulders (instead of sidewalk). It was moved (Tucker) to approve the Revised Development Plan 05-08A for Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Wildfire Subdivision, with an additional condition that hours of operation between 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. be limited solely to the plumbing business following expiration of the bread company lease in March 2008. The motion failed for lack of a second. It was moved and seconded (Tucker/Klink) to approve the Revised Development Plan 05-08A for Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Wildfire Subdivision, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, the added conditions #1 and #15, and the amended condition #6, and the motion passed unanimously. CONDITIONS: 1. Approved uses of Lot 1 are limited to self-service mini storage. Approved uses of Lot 2 are limited to building materials/services and one employee-housing unit. 2. Lot 1 hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Lot 2 hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM, except Lot 2 operations shall be allowed to begin at 6:30 AM for operations within enclosed structures. 3. No additional exterior lighting shall be allowed. 4. The light on the existing building shall be retrofitted to comply with Section 7.9 prior to issuance of building permits for the new structures. 5. All metal portions of the buildings shall be a matte finish to minimize reflection of light. 6. The east and south walls of Building F shall be constructed of wood or stone. 7. Per Section 5.2, the mechanism used to restrict the employee-housing unit shall be approved by the Town Attorney and recorded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 8. Drainage swales shall be grass swales instead of rip-rap wherever possible. 9. Public Works shall review and approve a revised stormwater plan. 10. Compliance with memo from Jeff Boles to Bob Goehring dated May 22, 2007 regarding this project. 11. Compliance with memo from Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated May 23,2007 regarding this project. 12. A recorded driveway maintenance agreement shall be submitted with the first building permit application. This agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the Town Attorney prior to recording. 13. A recorded drainage agreement shall be submitted with the first building permit application. This agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the Town Attorney prior to recording. 14. Lot size shall be shown on the drawing. 15.The existing bread-distribution business shall be allowed to operate for the duration of its present lease, which will expire in March 2008. 6. PROPOSED BLOCK 9 AMENDMENTS TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE This request is to make a number of changes and corrections to the Estes Valley Development Code. Planners Shirk and Chilcott summarized the proposed changes as follows: Section 4.3.C.5, Table 4-2: Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts regarding floor area ratio and lot coverage applicability Proposed changes specify that all development in residential zoning districts, except development of one single-family dwelling on a single lot, shall be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.30 and a maximum lot coverage of 50%. This will prevent a residentially zoned lot from being developed with a use (other than single- family dwelling) that covers more than 50% of the lot and more than a 0.30 FAR. Development of allowed uses such as day care centers, senior institutional living DRAFT I . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 5 June 19, 2007 facilities, private schools, and so forth, is currently allowed to exceed 50% lot coverage and 0.30 FAR. Section 7.1, Slope Protection Standards regarding development on steep slopes Proposed changes remove the exception regarding development on steep slopes for lots approved for single-family residential use prior to the effective date of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). These properties would then be subject to EVDC Section 7.7, Geologic & Wildfire Hazard Areas. Proposed changes also effectively change the definition of a steep slope from one of 30% or greater to one of 20% or greater. The developable lots remaining in the Estes Valley tend to be problematic, and planning staff has recently received a number of building permit applications with exceptional site disturbance, particularly due to driveway cuts. Excessive visual impact can result due to scarring of the land. This impacts not just neighboring properties, but all properties from which the site is visible, even those great distances away. Development on slopes of greater than 20% would allow planning staff to require the same level of detail that is required for development plan submittals and would require engineering for a grading permit, something that is already required by the adopted Building Code. An engineer would be involved in site design and mitigating the effects of stormwater runoff. Section 7.2, Grading and Site Disturbance regarding site disturbance standards The proposed change removes the exception regarding grading and site-disturbance standards for development on lots approved for single-family residential use prior to the effective date of the EVDC. The standards may restrict building location and associated driveways to a location that results in highest degree of compliance with these standards, thereby minimizing site disturbance. Planning staff considers this a continuation of proposed changes to Section 7.1. Some building permit applicants prefer to place their residence as high on a lot as possible to maximize views despite scarring caused by cuts for a driveway. With this change, a residence may be required to be placed lower on a slope than was previously allowed in order to prevent excessive site disturbance (driveway cuts, switchbacks, etc.). Section 7.11.F, Off-Street Parking and Loading, Location regarding location of guest parking spaces; The proposed change adds a condition regarding guest parking requirements for multi- family developments. Specifically, "Driveways may not be counted toward guest parking requirements. Guest parking shall be located to provide convenient access to all units and shall be dispersed throughout the site." The purpose of this change is to ensure provision of adequate guest parking that is safe and convenient for residents and guests of a development. Section 7.11.0.5. Basins and Drainage Facilities regarding Larimer County Stormwater Control Manual applicability; The proposed change adds the words "as amended" to the current code language, such that drainage facilities must comply with the Larimer County Stormwater Control _Manual, ap amended to ensure compliance with the most recently adopted regulations. Section 10.4.A2 regarding lot width, Section 10.5.H Exemptions regarding exemption for review of two-unit condominium projects; Planning staff recently discovered conflicting code language regarding minimum-lot- width requirements. The proposed change corrects this conflict by adding the following language (addition italicized): Lot width shall comply with standards set forth in Tables 4-2 and 4-5 and shall be no less than thirty (30) feet at the front lot line. Flagpole lots shall comply with S 10.4.A.c, and shall be no less than thirty (30) feet at the front lot DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 6 June 19, 2007 line or seventy-five (75) feet at the building line, or such greater width as may be required by this Code. Section 10.5.M, Condominiums, Townhouses, and Other Forms of Airspace Ownership The EVDC currently does not require review of condominium developments consisting of two units or less. EVDC standards for subdivision of property still apply to such development, but there is no opportunity for planning staff to communicate that information to the property owner. Therefore, the proposed change removes subsection 3, Exemptions, which exempts condominium projects of two units or less from the appropriate review and approval. Appendix D.1, General, regarding the Larimer County Road Standards Manual applicability; The proposed change adds the words "as amended" to the current code language, such that Larimer County Road Standards, as amended, apply in order to ensure compliance with the most recently adopted regulations. Appendix D.Ill, General Site Access regarding driveway design The proposed changes add the requirement that no driveway may be so located as to block or alter access to adjoining properties or uses. They also require driveway aprons to be either less than five (5) feet in length or greater than twenty (20) feet in length unless it is demonstrated that the design will not interfere with adjoining traffic movements. Planning staff has observed poor traffic circulation within a number of multi-family developments in the Estes Valley and has received complaints from property owners regarding this issue. Staff seeks to ensure provision of safe and reasonable access by all users of roads/drives within such developments. Discussion Commissioner Kitchen expressed general support of the proposed changes but requested additional time to consider the impacts of the changes proposed to EVDC Section 7.1, Slope Protection Standards. \1 was agreed to continue the discussion at the next meeting. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Kitchen) to continue the discussion of proposed Block 9 changes to the Estes Valley Development Code to the July 17, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, and the motion passed unanimously. 7. REPORTS Planner Shirk stated on June 18, 2007 the Board of County Commissioners approved the Charles Heights and Reed's Subdivision plats, which were heard by the Planning Commission at the May 15, 2007 meeting and recommended for approval. He also noted that the County Commissioners approved the retention of an existing sixty-foot right-of-way width for the proposed Stone Bridge development in lieu of requiring an additional twenty feet of right-of-way, which is the recently adopted standard for Larimer County roads. This was the only modification granted by the County Commissioners. A development plan for the Stone Bridge condominium development is scheduled for Planning Commission review at the July 17, 2007 meeting. There being no further business, Chair Hull adjourned the meeting at 3:07 p.m. Betty Hull, Chair Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary DRAFT Estes Park Medical Center Location & Extent Review p---v Revised Special Review #06-01 A ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 •„„„* Estes Park, CO 80517 ~Im=*d Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT OVERVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: July 2,2007 TITLE: "Amended Development Plan for Estes Park Medical Center" LOCATION: The property is located at 555 Prospect Avenue within the Town of Estes Park. Legal: Hospital Addition #*I APPLICANT /PROPERTY OWNER -~~LU C;91• USFS , Park Hospital District, Estes Park -»--IlD<54 -7- Medical Center/Same Gfl,nr,1 8,1,11 . A Ark¥ 36 Acm= I . Nbultain 1- - 1 USFS CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Kerry r#or'el ./ Prochaska, Cornerstone Engineering and = Surveying, Inc. ts.b M USES RMNP Buld3ry STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott 1 APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: The Park Hospital District has submitted an application to expand the emergency room facilities. This is a special review application. Planning Commission serves as the recommending-body and Town Board is the decision-making body. This is also a location and extent review, which means that the Park Hospital District can override a Town Board decision or a specific condition, provided they follow the procedures outlined in the Colorado Revised Statutes. A description of the expansion and remodel are listed below: The Estes Park Medical Center is proposing to remodel and add 6,900 sf to the Emergency Department along the southern side of the existing building and 2,985 sf of renovation in the existing building. With this remodel and addition the layout of the Emergency area will change from the existing 3 bay trauma area, 1 exam room, and 1 ortho exam room to the proposed design of a 2 bay trauma area, 6 exam rooms, and 1 cardiac trauma room. Part of the added square footage is in an area that is an infill area along the south side of the existing building. The emergency department will be expanded there on the upper level and the lower level will be used as a file storage area. The proposed construction will not increase the height of the building as it is today. The exterior finish will be consistent with the rest of the existing building. The existing ambulance parking structure will be removed and rebuilt in the same location to better accommodate the emergency vehicles. This expansion will result in the reduction of time spent for patients waiting for emergency care, but no added personnel are anticipated at this time. II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Lots One Parcel Number 35254-11-901 Gross Land Area = 9.135 acres 397,899 sq. ft. Net Land Area Existing Zoning "RM" Multi-Family Residential Proposed Zoning "RM" Multi-Family Residential Existing Land Use Hospital Senior Institutional Living - Skilled-Nursing Facility Proposed Land Use Same SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Fire Protection Town of Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Gas Xcel Energy Company Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest MAPPED HAZARDS/PHYSICAL FEATURES Mapped Hazard/Physical Feature Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No Streams/Rivers No Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Deer Page #2 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue SITE STATISTICS/DENSITY CALCULATIONS/FLOOR AREA RATIO Land Areas 397,899 sf 9.135 acres Lot Coverage Building 79,487 sf 19.98% Parking Areas / Driveway 128,125 sf 32.21% Sidewalks I 1,347 s f 2.85% Total 218,959 sf 55.03% Open Areas 178,940 sf 44.97% Floor Area Ratio Existing Buildings Gross SF 147,805 sf Proposed Addition Gross SF 6,900 sf Gross Floor Area 154,705 sf FAR Gross Floor Area / Gross Lot Area = 38.9% LOCATION MAP AND ADJACENT LAND USES Residential uses Br-4-\ 9-,1,~ f are adjacent to\ all hospital CUL \-\ 1 9 1 / ,/lit y .:.0.01 R 1 1 11* · - Hospital -- -- - -3 F - "RIVI" 16 ' 1 2 Page #3 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue AERIAL PHOTOS 0.* 3, - 40 tr, 4 t. --1 *-t 41¢-t- -, 4 1 0 73*4- i le>ktiC:•i. rj #f · : -4 0 9 0 ~ ·-, A Firr j. 4; ~<r ~ ~ FLE ¢ L , ..8#frde;-694 I=i \ , f 0//0/t/ 1- IL ts- r. . - 4,41 . ::fr.*19~ *ft . I .I ~fr'*/\ ?1 ta /*000"~1: p mi - :i 1 - pil ~u .1 1. E~ ' I .1. 9 1 k·, ' vill 4 24 'ff"Li~ ~0* 181 III. REVIEW CRITERIA Applications for approval of a special review use shall: 1. Follow the standard development approval process set forth in EVDC §3.2. This includes the requirement to review development plan applications and all submitted plans and reports, and evaluate them according to the following standards: a. The development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code; and Page #4 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue b. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement and other similar plans. 2. Demonstrate compliance with all applicable criteria and standards set forth in Estes Valley Development Code Chapter 5, "Use Regulations," of this Code. 3. Demonstrate compliance with the following requirement: The application for the proposed special review use mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment. This application does not fall within the parameters of staff-level review9 and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission and Estes Park Town Board. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners provided comments. Estes Park Department of Building Safety. (no comment) Estes Park Public Works Department (see Mangleson 06/18/07) Town Attorney (no comment) V. STAFF FINDINGS Staff finds: 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is incorporated as a staff finding. 2. Estes Valley Development Code Staff finds that, if the recommended conditions of approval are met, the development plan will comply with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code, with any waivers and modifications to standards noted iii the staff report. The application for the proposed special review use mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment. Page #5 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue 3. Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan Staff finds that, if the recommended conditions of approval are met, the development plan will be consistent with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement, and other similar plans. 4. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. Neighbor Comments This request has been submitted to neighbors for consideration and comment. No comments were received. 6. Residential Zoning District Density and Dimensional Standards The proposed uses, i.e., hospital and senior institutional living (skilled nursing facility), are permitted in the "RM" Multi-Family Residential zoning district by special review. The proposed development complies with the applicable density and dimensional standards. These uses are not subject to the floor area or impervious coverage limits in the "RM" Multi-Family Residential zoning district. The maximum allowable floor area ratio and maximum allowable lot coverage percentage for multi-family use are thirty percent and fifty percent, respectively. Maximum floor area ratios and lot coverage are not applicable to this use; however, the applicant has provided this information at staff s request. This development will bring the overall floor area ratio to 38.9 percent and the lot coverage to 55.03 percent. 7. Slope Protection, Grading and Site Disturbance The slope protection standards do not apply to the development area and there are no significant physical features to protect in the development area. Limits of Disturbance There are no platted limits of disturbance. Construction limits of disturbance are shown on the plan and staff is supportive of these limits of disturbance. The site is heavily disturbed and there are no features that meet the criteria for protection, with the exception of a few trees in the south landscape island. 8. Tree and Vegetation Protection There are three existing pine trees at the south landscape island that will remain. Page #6 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue 9. Landscaping and Buffers The proposed number of trees and shrubs exceeds the EVDC landscaping requirements and staff is supportive of the associated planting plan. 10. Wetlands and Stream Corridor Protection There are no wetlands or streams/rivers on site to protect. 11. Geologic and Wildfire Hazards The property is not in a mapped geologic or wildfire hazard area. 12. Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting should be shielded and downcast. 13. Off-Street Parking and Loading Parking calculations found on page one of the development plan show that 199 spaces are required and 214 are provided. Ten accessible spaces are required and fifteen are provided, though some of the existing accessible spaces in the upper parking lot do not meet current standards. The lower parking lot areas have been completed with Phase I of the Development Plan of 2006. There are no plans to expand the parking lots on the upper part of the site. The plan depicts a patient drop off area that fronts the entrance to the Emergency Department that will be limited to 10 or 15 minute parking limit. 14. Adequate Public Facilities The following utilities currently are of service to this property: Water Town of Estes Park Electric Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Gas Xcel Energy Telephone Qwest Storm Drainage A revised storm water management plan has been submitted that demonstrates the existing detention to be adequate. A roof drain (8" to 15" ADS) is to discharge onto rip rap at the southeast comer of the new addition. This point of discharge then runs across the sidewalk to the curb and gutter. The handling of this storm water poses a potential hazard to pedestrians on the side walk and therefore should be designed so that there is no surface flow across the sidewalk. Page #7 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review#06-01,555 Prospect Avenue Fire Protection ISO calculations were routed to the Fire Chief for review and comment. No concerns were expressed. The calculations showed that the four existing hydrants will provide sufficient fire flow. Transportation The expansion of the emergency room is not expected to generate any significant increase in traffic. A traffic impact analysis was submitted with the major expansion just completed estimating an increase of 272 vehicles trips per day, raising the daily trips generated by the hospital from 1,138 to 1,410 vehicle trips, which Cornerstone has stated is not a significant increase. This assumes that on any given day 153 of the 250 hospital employees are working. Electricity All new lines will be underground. This plan was routed to Public Works and no concerns were expressed about the proposed design. 15. Street Access There currently exists three access points to this site: two access points from Prospect Ave. (one on the east, another on the south), and one access via Stanley Circle on the north. The Stanley Circle access has been blocked by concrete curb and gutter and only allow for emergency access. This allows for two Public accesses on the east and south. Additionally, there is an ambulance entrance and MRI semi-trailer ramp access. One change is proposed to the southern access driveway to allow the ambulances a better turning radius as they exit their parking area. It is proposed to widen the entry drive at the neck to 28' from the existing 24' to allow the minimum turning radius needed for the ambulances. No changes are planned for the driveway within the ROW. The existing curb cut at the street was narrowed with the site work done during Phase I and will not be affected by this change. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Revised Special Review #06-01A CONDITIONAL TO: 1. The routing of the roof storm water discharge shall be re-designed to avoid surface flows across the sidewalk at the street. 2. Submittal of Site Construction drawings consistent with these approved plans upon application for a building permit. Page #8 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to recommend APPROVAL of Revised Special Review #06-01A to the Town Board of Trustees with staffs' findings and conditions. Page #9 - Estes Park Medical Center Special Review #06-01,555 Prospect Avenue Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 06-18-07 Re: Estes Park Medical Center, Location and Extent Review, 555 Prospect Avenue The Light and Power Department and Water Department have reviewed the Application for Special Review/ Location and Extent Review for the above referenced property and have the following comment. 1) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 2) We will in the future need accurate As-Built in electronic dxf or dwg, for both utilities Mylar, and paper versions. 3) We need the proposed load data to aid in establishment of facilities sizing. Water Department 1) Fixture count submittal with building permit is fine. Contact the department at 970-577-3622 for verification of any demolition to ensure any applicable credit toward additional water fees. 2) The 4" water service line that was planned for abandonment after the new 8" water main and 6" service line was installed (development plan 05-10) has still not be completed. As an informational note this old service does run underneath a section of the new building addition. 1 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 .Tune 19, 2007 ALISON CHILCO'IT, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Special Review/Location and Extent Review #06-01 - Estes Park Medical Center Dear Ms. (Chilcott: I have no comment. 1 fyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. XI Ved Truly Yours, , ~ 4 , 6_14 // / C.;rego~> A. White .. 'i „v,/ldt- ; Un * 1 0 CC: Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Fax: 970/586-2459 MEMORANDUM To: Alison Chilcott, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: June 19, 2007 Subject: Estes Park Medical Center Amended Special Review/Location and Extent Review #06-01 Hospital Addition to the Town of Estes Park 555 Prospect Avenue The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for a Special Review/Location and Extent Review for the above-referenced property and has no comment at this time. Memo 6 To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 06-18-07 Re: Estes Park Medical Center, Location and Extent Review, 555 Prospect Avenue The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for Special Review/ Location and Extent Review for the above referenced property and has the following comment. 1) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 2) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 3) We need the proposed load data to aid in establishment of facilities sizing. 1 i CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 1 Fax: (970) 506-2459 ENGINEERING & Gi• ''4, SURVEYING. INC. IS May 23,2007 r. Mr. Bob Joseph, Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Statement of Intent, Estes Park Medical Center Emergency Department Remodel & Addition Dear Mr. Joseph: °omerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc.(CES) on behalf of the Estes Park Hospital District is pleased to mit plans, reports, and correspondence for an Amended Development Plan at the site o f the existing Estes ~ ark Medical Center. The Center covers approximately 9.1 acres developed under the Hospital Addition. Every attempt has been made for the proposed Development Plan to meet or exceed the applicable design standards as set forth in the Town of Estes Park Development Code. With this submittal CES has included the previously approved Traffic Analysis, a revised ISO Calculation sheet, and a slightly revised Drainage Report that reflects the minor increase in site impervious coverage. PROJECT LOCATION The above property is bordered by Prospect Ave & Fir Ave. on the east and Moccasin Circle Dr. on the south. More specifically the property located at 555 Prospect Ave., Hospital Addition, located in Sec 25, T5N, R73W of Estes Park, Colorado. OWNERS/LIENHOLDERS The property is currently owned by Estes Park Hospital District. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Estes Park Medical Center is proposing to remodel and add 6,900 sf to the Emergency Department along the southern side of the existing building and 2,985 sf o f renovation in the existing building. With this remodel addition the layout o f the Emergency area will change from the existing 3 bay trauma area, 1 exam room, _.d 1 ortho exam room to the proposed design of a 2 bay trauma area, 6 exam rooms, and 1 cardiac trauma room. Part of the added square footage is in an area that is an infill area along the south side of the existing building. The emergency department will be expanded there on the upper level and the lower level will be used as a file storage area. The proposed construction will not increase the height ofthe building as it is today. The exterior finish will be consistent with the rest of the existing building. The existing ambulance parking structure will be removed and rebuilt to better accommodate the emergency vehicles be used at present. This expansion will result in the reduction of time spent for patients waiting for emergency care, but no added personnel are anticipated at this time. ACCESS There currently exists three access points to this site Two from Prospect Ave. (one on the east, another on the south) and one access via Stanley Circle on the north. The Stanley Circle access has been blocked by concrete curb and gutter and only allow for emergency access. This allows for two Public accesses on the east and south. Additionally, there is an ambulance entrance and MRI ramp access. The lower parking lot areas have been completed with Phase I ofthe Development Plan of 2006. There are no plans to expand the parking lots on the upper part of the site. The plan depicts a patient drop off area that fronts the entrance to the Emergency Department that will be limited to 10 or 15 minute parking limit. One change is proposed to the southern access driveway to allow the ambulances a better turning radius as they exit their parking area. It is proposed to widen the entry drive at the neck to 28' from the existing 24' to allow the minimum turning radius needed for the ambulances. No changes are planned for the driveway within the ROW. The existing curb cut at the street was narrowed with the site work done during Phase I and will not be affected by this change. ENVIRONMENTAL There are no wetlands on this site. UTILITIES All main line loops are shown on this plan for electric, cable TV and telephone. Gas - Gas is on the site. Water- Water service for this remodel will be from within. Added fixture counts will be done with building permit submittal. Sewer - Al sewer main extensions and upgrades have been completed with Phase I. The following utilities currently are ofservice to this property: Water Town of Estes Park Electric Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District (las Xcel Energy Telephone Qwest STORMWATER With this submittal is a Preliminary Drainage Report that calculates storm water volumes for the added impervious coverage due to this proposed development. A 1985 Drainage Study was used to establish the current volumes and pond sizing for detention. The pond and existing storm water system has been completed this last year (2006). The present plan will reclaim approximately 1500 sf of asphalt area in Sub Basin A2. Sub Basin Cl and Dl will have minor increases to the designed storm water flows. The existing drainage system, inlets and detention pond, are adequate to manage the storm water associated with the added impervious areas. The proposed Addition is projected to increase discharge rates by minor amounts,.29 efs and .27 efs for the 100 year storm events in sub basins C1 and Dl. The storm water storage required will increase from .32 acre-feet to .33 acre- feet for the 100 year event. This will be an additional rise of less than 1 inch in the recently constructed detention pond. Therefore CES concludes that no oversizing o f the detention pond is required. SCHEDULE The applicant would like to begin construction the fall of 2007 with completion summer of 2008. A final Phasing Plan has not been determined. SITE STATISTICS/DENSITY CALCULATIONS/FLOOR AREA RATIO Land Areas 397,899 sf 9.135 acres Lot Coverage Building 79,487 sf 19.98% Parking Areas / Driveway 128,125 sf 32.21% Sidewalks 11,347 sf 2.85% Total 218,959 sf 55.03% Open Areas 178,940 sf 44.97% Floor Area Ratio Existing Buildings Gross SF 147,805 sf (includes 10,794 sf for duplexes) Proposed Addition Gross SF 6,900 sf oss Floor Area 154,705 sf FAR Gross Floor Area / Gross Lot Area 154,705 / 397,899 = 38.9% TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A Traffic impact analysis is included with this submittal. The Traffic Analysis was reviewed and approved with the 2006 Development Plan Review. This Phase o f construction will have little or no impact on the existing traffic data. The added area to the emergency department does not include any new overnight beds or any increase in use. The hospital does not anticipate any additional staffbeing added with this remodel. The proposed improvements are intended to lessen the time spent waiting for emergency treatment. Therefore CES does not predict any increase in traffic numbers as they exist today. If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact us at (970) 586-2458. 1 1 U £144) M AL Kerry Prochaska, P.E. Principal Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLILATI LE© IED VE ~ Submittal Date: May 23,2007 f Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment ndo fe Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation - Preliminary Map . Rezoning Petition 1- Street Name Change r Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify 12 . F r Minor Subdivision Plat M . 4 E Amended Plat 5 .· Ii- i. General Information 0%3:-I e :1 . Project Name Estes Park Medical Center ii , ; ; Project Description Emergency Department Addition and Renovation ' Project Address 555 Prospect Ave, Estes Park, CO 80517 Legal Description Hospital addition located in NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 .F R Parcel ID # 35254-11-901 Section 25 Township 5N Range 73W p Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 9.135 Existing Land Use Hospital Proposed Land Use Same Existing Water Service Ix Town F Well F Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service W Town F- Well E Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service !52' EPSD 2 UTSD P Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service N EPSD r UTSD F Septic Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes R No Existing Gas Service R Xcel E- Other E None Existing Zoning RM Multi family Proposed Zoning Same Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? 7 Yes R No Has site staking been completed? F Yes IV No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Ross W. Stephen Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave, Estes Park, CO 80517 29 Attachments i }f r Application fee 4 2- {5/ Statement of intent il< 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan g 11 " X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan 1/ t: fir Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which 9' t. may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. n-¥7 Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue .A Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 + Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev ........ ~ Contact Information i- I ~ - I ..th . : Primary Contact Person is r- Owner 1 Applicant [$< Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) Park Hospital District Mailing Address P.O. Box 2740, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 577-4300 Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Park Hospital District h.fil i Mailing Address P.O. Box 2740, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 577-4300 4 i.»t. Cell Phone Fax Email ~% L Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. i .0 0 6 Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave. Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-2458 .21 - I Cell Phone 1 Fax (970) 586-2459 Email . APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: ) <3 Record Owner PLEASE PRINT.- 16· ¥ n ," L. 0 ·c--Ix 0 421- Applicant PLEASE PRINT Signatures: Record Owner L~»,x--A- r)L-/ Date <-3 ' 6~ l.037 A Applicant £~~ Date APPLICANT CERTIFICATIO. • I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. • In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) • I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. * I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. • I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. • The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. • I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to memv I the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/Am- ACir n u~ N Sck of-ef Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: 0 / Record Owner , Date 03 23 07 ...r- . Applicant Date Revised 10/13/06 W \4 -/16:1/1/ i Ul \4 - 1 . 4 - a * 4 r 4 ' . 11, *1 I 8 8/11 f PY Z // 1 0 # 3 6 4, 42 E LE< I . ...1. 1 1 :f g 15 &52 4 il 1 & i i m i 1 == 2 1 1, 6 5 8: 1 = 4 -m: m m.f -fin 3%@ n , 1 \ 1 -r/, E 0 1 4 3 3 2 %11 3 IM ~- 1-- W ~- a. 2 0 1- 9, - ,1 1 1,/=giwir LiN#2 ,• / r. ri. c j r --7 - 0 ·43' I 1 Ir--I- 1.2 , . 1 0 U f 7 ..'AD 1 1 f. *40 92 , 1 If =-9 , EL 34 01 4, 10 c ' ~ mA 0 El O EEU~~ LOOE E E AVM Jugulpedep Bulls!xe 041 JO 8 uetn @Joul It lueumedep hou@Bl ANARNA ANAAN AN O%5:5 0 @@@E@@ s@@33@Ew@@Foggg h 00 00 00 coc~ 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~ (\1 00 00 N U)~0 00 00 90 000000 9000000000¤002000000 8008200 NOQUOUQUOOOUOUUOUU c-0080000006<00»&008 € 2 € 2€ €€*€€x j€€44€ O-U €€¤0 #€ 00 / CO COCUSCom#=cocococom:gcoccu -O=(O 0.0. O 0.0- . g 0-0.0- 0-0- u co. 0- 2 -@0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 -O 0 CD -k CD 2 * 0 * 24 0 2 0 2 0 2 #2 -92 0)26 9 t 2 L~ UU ~ LU LU LLI LU LU LU UI LU LLI CD LU U.1 0 J LU LLI LU LU LU LLI CO LU LLI 00 0 LL LU 2 0 0 6 2>.2 e ** 6 8 8.% -2 2 3 W 629 2 2 3% 0 3235 28 7 Au *3 2 / m E c) 0 0 0 -CO 0%**Y ~Es ~ttl; 130€E E -~~3~ CCJ-0 E <D f#.g< 2.<t¥*< 22 ME E=Lo "Mc# ME-c,EN<%* ,2 5,%*.2516@2*551%262 -mmoxb*.Eau)6360-%30 ..3 ~ Lu m U) m -1 LU O. LU m m U-1 -1 0 - 00 C/)(9(OOmu-Ir-<coN=LU'oziLLIC/) 20902029*4009*628 Egogu 4- CD (0 91- A IN OCD 10 -CD ACD=NO O000(NI CO Lf) 1 0. 91- 0.- 0. - 4- CD * 0- 0- 1 0 - - - - N O. 10 0. 91- - - r-- CNI Xt- 4- CO N CD - CNI 0 (0 2 .52 E LO L 00 (0 0- 0- - 0- +9% CIO CIO 0 -O - U) LD ~0 * - (0 A C U) -0 0 U) & *c A 01 c (0 m U >. O 11 2, E C co Nis buth»=% 52*{LfuLLE O -92 [ED- %6 b :70- E fe 42 JE & 0 2 ~ r- ~ 4 2:0 2/" 8*~lu 2222 ~od #i~IE@@9 5%2~22~*~33®g- u) u) L >, € 2 g.¤*-4@-0 i c ,- 8€5.g co a E g€ E-2 3 -0 $9 N R r -8 2 22.0 4- co 9g2o@g#2825328€8#g*622*2g:2341%M82 E 9900-Lk IIeH 8 Sepelo lim €0608 01!ns 'enue Uel.UX.1 1 Elm LLC; 411 Elm LLC; 408 Fir LLC Anthony Ricciardi 837 Panorama Circle Estes Park, 80517 Park View Lane Estes Park, 80517 Estes Park, 80517 Estes Park, 80517 Elizabeth Halas Estes Park, 80517 80517 434 Fir Partnership 80517 Kathleen Kase Avenue stes Park, 80517 orma 80517 80517 stes Park, 80517 stes Park, 80517 Owner Owner 11 Address City, State, tes Park, 80517 stes Park, ,>ped selsE] peohl >leeJO qs!=1 6€ L uosdwiS leelpehl 9 U eAUCI 8101!0 Jewouelfl epueJa suieN selie40 GOnig PeRS e>ie u!.well.138 eu!xeIN Jelueld e!0!.1 rbara Hoffman PO Box 1756 ¥1.0-90 hIS Pepueltlv JetlleO les!PelAI d3 Christine Hall ndwehr Stacey Collins jeulneqssnN IOJeO *1 suiM k X 1- FOREE u Ir) O. CN r- CD m 0 -5 06 15 ZA O#Z Sm E wner Owner 11 Address City, State, Zip arc & Carol Smith 69 Stanley Circle Drive Estes Park, CO 80517 Stanitz Evergreen Apartments Donwood Drive Naperville, IL 60540 eann Sumner 8~~~1376 Estes Park, CO 80517 ark & Karin Swanlund Lane Estes Park, CO 80517 ichard & Dorothy Sykora do Paula Sykora Stanley Circle Drive Estes Park, CO 80517 Eleanor J. Tjossem Trust Paul Tjossem Elmwood Drive Marshalltown, IA 50158 Frederick & Debra Wojcik 470 Moccasin Drive Estes Park, CO 80517 Katharine & Rufus Wallingford 3711 San Felipe Street, Unit 1 Houston, ¥ 1.0-90 EIS pepuelu¥ Jetuao 180!pen d3 AMENDED 05/23/2007 LOCATED IN THE N.E. 1/4 OF c THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF ;c Town of Estes Park Excel one Qwest upper parking spaces and al 182 spaces existing, reconfiguring iposed parking spaces for a total rom rear and 10 feet from sides. g; (refer to Estes Valley eet lights will not exceed native grasses/wildflower in a healthful condition by the ted by an automated system. * and built bear proof. Colorado prior to '.U. T.C.D. standards. 99 SF 9.135 ACRES ,794 sf duplexes) 39=38.9% (previous 37.1%) EE8GE 11QI 387 sf 18.24% 125 sf 32.21% 347 sf 2.85% ,059 sf 53.30% 340 sf 46.70% 00 sf 1.7% ,959 sf 55.03% 340 af 44.97% REGULAR HANDICAP TOTAL 154 7 161 10 1 11 1 HOSPITAL 45 2 47 SF PROPOSED) OF REQUIRED 209 10 219 199 15 214 f the real property as shown on this the Estes Valley Development Code lorado, pertaining thereto. Day Il~ E©EDV [57 1 1, :4 %!fl JUL 1 1 2007 teed in tessibility in uirements. DI I C IVIAY N 1692 BIG THOMPSON V, -*# -u .,t pursuant to DATE: Dec 08, 2005 JOB NO: 395.001-_505.001 SCALE 1" = 100' ~ SUITE 200 - (970) 586-2458 Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S., as amended. REV DATE: FEB 7, 2006 ESTES PARK, CO. 80517 \~7 FAX (970) 586-2459 improvements and does not show all the design elements needed to SHEET: 1 of 4 This development plan is a schematic representation of proposed REV DATE: MAY 23, 2007 construct cny of the improvements. AMENDED 05/23/2007 'i'%1· , 2 1 1 {, 1 , -re.' i¢. 1 W ,/ I , a. . A .- *i~ 4 41 L 11.L . . '1 1 1 14 1 .Ill# , 3. E ir £ 1, 1.11< '1:1 ': 1 11 :'Jll, -1. 1-: ;£' i m il, 0 M 44 r= 1 06 *.15. 4~2-A~' - ,&5"Wi#c~L#--2<~'1"'9///~-F=* ,# ir 'M . 9 -2-1~144 -,L - 4 4 L.J U 1,."ll- % Faltip-*MA,581//Mifall'li~*4fe£/39 . 4/63)20/01:& Wk *942~-5474*Ji -,0- f *¥r. ... 1 0. .A . - 1 ... ....AD V ' 9 2 k F..,,.~... .A. 1 A . - . ..AD. A. .. L¥,;11./,r yip:.0 . - e?2- t. , *-F,bg<SHEEW'* 2 - I . . . A - A , : 1 A A - -- -, :,~FI.:7'1<,1,6 - HI=~M./St:i,,2~*.'IM.W~~~Ir.*C '/ , - .ET. ..4../01.) -nu -4- 0 .A. e ..Al. .. .. I . 3.1616&601*4:254<:,4- 1 565*/2'fiE/ME,2.7,/brkj,54:mill'~6. - ZE=- * 1 't . I. -I . 0 . 444 4!•Mmen~'R:?N;' . I . ... I .. .. . I.- I. , - 7~< . : tta~framil'%~ithLi g -- - _ ..... .. . I. ..... . . . . ... Al,=&11¥L e..~ . . i. ;71' De, U,~Ftta*~ ..4; 1 .. . 4 0 . $ I - .. .. .. . 49 I 92 ...2- '. 20~ 9%t 1 . k ,. ¥ 1 1 01%0%##P - I ... I ... 19 / birm.-.2 - .. .1 -/ D I ... ' 1 N*62(2% I-4£*19-.rd-/1249,f&b~f„4-wli~tq<~1% 11 --1 .. I . 2 . . . ... , . I I I. .... .. ... I ... . j I :00 . *---1/.4h1/:0 , 4/1 - ,~5~FliP - . . a .. . . Aty-- 'al*,69%22- Cal=i;ip - -A~- . I~-/Obl v . , 0 0, 9, 4 -i< 7 h-- , 0 , . 0 - . .. - .. - .. ... G 111 ... . . 41 .... . 2 0.2 -: 4 :-I. -.:... . 4, . 0 ...... . ..0 A . ..... , - . I .. 4 . . . .: D I. .. . - ID .0 - . - 0 -0.ID '. 11 A ... ... D .. . - . ..4 .4 . D . ... I ID -I- 0 . 1 0 I . , 02 I. I 02 , , 1, .1 --0 - 9 0, . . 1 -01¢ . 4 ,. 0. . . , 1 -6, -0 - /0 - .... . .... I */00.0 .. '~'''Ij,41141.2 i . 00 .. . 0 -1 .. m : 0 '93 - -- D :D ,.. - .. .0 :D . ... . 1 1 ... I - ..-. A .. - I .0 . 1 . ...0 .1 .... 0 '' - O . S!1321U=" : . . . 00 1 . i-I "I . 0 2. 2 0 -D ..- 1.- . .-/.4. . ...... ..... N. 7.,- . ... I ... -0 . . .. G=A .6 1 . . .- .A. 1 = Id,#I I' - - 0 = Wika F 0- '. 9 m 24 7-: . 0, ... I. . ..l, 0 0 V 0 0 D. . I .. ... - . I .-. . ... .... D ..0 101 \ c r Ill 1011*.4 11\ c ; k . I . -..... I ..... 5 1 1.4 \ I.Lh 11\ c z. 11\ 4 - .... . ID : .. D l' i i . ': AMENDED 05/23/2007 \ \ C \\\ l j//; 60'460 CONCRETE STORMWATER END SIDEWALK 60:WA#Atik-<tuW~N PARCEL #36251-05-018 PARCEL #35251 LMLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN MANHOL STRUCTURE HERE / E-Esl~~ \ 'R' /NLET (REPLAC E)(/S77NG MANHOLE) (SIDEWALK BEYOND BY OTHERS) 70 NORm ASPHALT TO BE, 1 1 / / RE46€D, ' - 44 R40.00' <5~ ExISTING 24- RCP kN=id < < 1< 1,8 134*k)*kib~-mET<11#a--tlix,Hogrflitff 1,4e st--0- ; .»f 'R'j j\~ ~~-- s /\9~ -,T s -9- -~- @,723io· *g'a,g<~ 4PROSPECT AVE. PROWDE TOPSOIL 2-ESTA~ PROPERTY I INF \ N 89·43'001 tz i ) 1 3~Xema 2 :- 71 ~\ \ PRESENT DUR U -1 BUILDING ffl\\\\43 \ \ \F \ \ 1 1\ 1\\ \\\ \\ \ 1 - \ , 4/ \ \\\\\\\\~1111 ~121#21 63~32ff:~~~1~~~111 1////1 1 1 lilli 11 \ N 11 1 1 1 1 11-1 1 11-PS- 30 0 30 60 SCALE 1" = 30' S 89'53'27" E 246.77' (MEAS.) PROPERTY 1 INF EAST 246.60' (PLATTED) )R CONSTRUCTION k & SIGNATURE EACH SHET 6/06/07 5.00' 13/*704WW BY: RWS , ./1 "-1.,41 w': RWS 474*97//i'//--12{-rE=L 18' -LI 9.--. 4.Lifse,+47re-S Ti ©N WEST SIDE 1« -~ MADE TO THE REPORT SUBMITTED WITH THE PHASE 11 CHECKED BY: KMP \ U.W. r W/DDEN TO 28' , ~ 40 COMPACTED BASE \2 AT DR(VEWAY NECK ~ , AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE ADDED IMPERVIOUS JOB NUMBER: 57'35Wu©~EL OR UNDISTURBED SOIL ' ~ EXISTING CONCRETE- SO/L - 09 /, , PLAN AND ALL STORMWATERS CONTINUE TO BE DRAWING NO. - CROSSPAN (TYP.) AREAS ADDED HAS NO EFFECT ON THE OVERALL 505.001_395.001 \ 174-al \ Ilip--- CONCRETE SIDEWALK/CURB/PARKING [\/0 0/51~ DISPERSED TO THE SAME DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. C3.1 1 -0-- NTS V /©L/ 1 MARCEL #35254-19-001 SHEET: / SEWERT ADDITION 2 of 4 R-2 AMENDED 05/23/2007 (~33=r.4 Nw-,A i ..aidn,gAgrl rlgrINgal¥ 4, , ... * v~"/011/v 91///1////1"'ll/M/97 .. .4 ..< 11.....~9 4 ..bqi.40'41 L ~-4 ...'M.I.- 4& .·r: 7 1, I - - # 0 : 241 1.-- - 1 0 ..4 -- I .1 - 49 - J * 9.- 0 0 .1 , ~~ R & 1~~ ., 2, 7 . fc t''. 9 1 , . . . 4. 2 ... . . T. ...A '' I- ....iM......10. - '00 4---2 :",4 ..1 ..' i - I..- ..4 le - O' 4 8 e ixe:,2%/ V*AF/;//93* 1 60 C 1 :2....6 0-- . I . '' 046#Vi#£#fe~)33*~I .... . ..3 1 4 0 4) O .j ./ , ..2, I 0 1 »6.X . I. trily,2,U,- 0,;,q. , 1. 1 . .- . :4./9/)4(/)•t;* Sittily~ - I . 1. D . .. 1 168.-644%<~¥w~ / :/4-1 I - 4 ... , .......2......./.- /// 1 ~~0. J. 0 1 f " ' , a , 2 7//IMI. I."pv"'::ilill 'L- * 1'1&4.1, Ill ./.I ... ... •967'/ EU~ r k . , ... 9- - 4. 1590' ..111 1 live , 0 - 41 . 1. 1. ..6.*. lal 0. - , , ..2 1 , " , 00 ....,-/- 0 0 . + 6/ 14 'Im.IN, 1 1 3 1 Ek-- 1/U, /75-=Wil ... .1.1 J./ , 1 €4.1 - n ' Ade:t"'Sillill. =1 1 .- ...~ - ° 2,222<11~~Il:~~1. 4/6/*~<f'~~~~~~~~~~i~ 'AL.L: - . 0 1. u .9...EK * 42 A :f *4&2* ... 0 1./Waq- f (,110 & 4 --- .VA-0, , r- - Nililillimilillililli~lz~:Abb. c 9 1 FWA jfr. f....6 74\,1,10. 1. , O --1 Apl 1 -AN :, , \.m . . .....r,~ 1 /0-0-la./5. % Ilip-0//Il * I .1. - . 0 ~ ./4 'yx =e** P.' '1/, 0 W.r419,7 4. - 0,a- 47™7™7 J * ./lieillillilliA. 1 \ ti . 4 ]¢1 . . I . WR.1 - 1 4 vt .' m .' , 0 .Mgpj .. 1, , .0 .0 . i 1,"01? # 4 - . ~'~1/ 4 - ge. '. -A .., \ --.. . i #11· - N :46- El.bl<"21 1.. . I ' I . 5 -- ..... D . r. - 2,,2 - .1.r .. . A . .. ..... -01 -r . 1 2. -.2,2, . * 1 1 1. 1 lill'I . D .. ,1/4&iNviry,/Vppm; , 14 41-~,1-~*414~' Im' © .,4-Av~:.*~Ip, 1 /7-'11. - fililill~ellillillillgilil'filillillib '/ 'r.*f.I~Jt =-. -. 'V , I I --,0. 1 . - ..0 VT-'70..li~/SE,13/liCIT,7/:9/:4 ID . , 00 3% I. 1 I *. 0 . - d„... 101*000/li ...=1 .. I . /. 4€1 "11 , .. 0 - =e'•ah -EUAW#~&MK<<.e#,fAbgic,~.*WMM,~~ 6,96£gpiT-".MA'tyf~.~-/h,-~.-r'-~ , ...1 / 1~ .. , I. , - . ...... 0 ilillimmilmillifilillilimmill/alll:*iliMqii-ilill'llilillill'lli,lidill . . . m 0 . ... . 0. .0. A . I . : $ ..1 - . ... 4 - . A D ..... ,: 1 1 A . . 'AL i " A.: .lk - , AMENDED 05/23/2007 PHASE 11 EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ADDITION/REMODEL \5521/ 0 11 ~ Ir, 1 1 1 4 - A Ak +»R98*".* b .,fi" I,*"F ",64<161:L" - \ 1-i · ~ I lA All-0 nr nleTI ImnANIr,r l IPE F E- E 12 4L RC E, RAN\U R .1 C==P L 30 OC Z Za Ul 1- 0Z IJ 111 ]11/~ 69 Ul Ul 1 U--1-/- CL Ul 3 KI mz 1- Ul D Ul < /1//1 \ /»C V ~ 1J -\ 7.50' -1 T~ 1 ONLY VALD FOR CONSTRUCTION IF ORIGINAL SEAL a SIGNATURE ARE ON EACH SHEET PL011-ED: 6/06/07 DESIGNED BY: RWS I. 1 -*% 9 _~___ _~_~_ -09 1 --CURB/GUTTER = \- N<D- / DRAWN BY· RNS \ - -7= 1, CHECKED BY: KMP - »cON WEST SIDE 1-/ --S JOB NUMBER: 1 1 OMP \ L<<\ \ 505.001_395.001 '*IDDEN TO 28 __~ CHP 7 \ S \ \ ~ -4- \-1 --- DRAWING NO. \ 54.5' AT DRIVEWAY NECKE ' CS.1 0/ / 01. \ \ND / -\ R.O.W. SHEET: - -DHE - 3 of 4 18 31¥0 NOUdlbIOS30 'ON SNOISIA3hl .. :04. 1 ...0 . A --- .0 . .. A.1 0 0 .. . A I . . .. 00- V 0. -- . -- ---1/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 FY. ~ A 1. 10 . . 0 A 0 t/ 9 v A• I 6.-557, . .. 6 . .lIilt 9. r 4 f A ..A . .. AL t. 1 . 0 . . . I. A.. ... 8¥5 ~ 4 . . 9 .~0000~4 - .. . I . .'9 14 ¥ 9 » . 4 . . , 4 *U-w-- :. . 0 5 : a ..& -&91%~:C--I - 1 4 4 .9. 0 . - 46 4% 0 it . 2.11,j -I ..4~. 9..t---/ 4444*, 4.8,06. . 9.. . 0 <* pj.-r~.,""1~~ -4 . .. 1,»fe ) . 1 11.Apilia 44 ~ ....9.../.1.............ill.----~ 0 Ar.. G... . All......~~=~.......~.......................r 10 i -/ 2 - 4 /1/knip:,b·-1 4/1/2"i...i,/ a..& -im- 8--Illillilli8illillillagibI 10/'I~~ --1..:.,*i#Yaw A lill.~ 44.Lk~ 1.--~ I . $ -0 6 AMENDED 05/23/2007 , 1 i PARCEL #35251- UNLE PROSPECT i E-ESTATE PROPFRD¢ 1 INE N 89*43 383. r \ \ L ELANT GUIDE 12 PP - Pblu, pon,do/•00 /end,-0 Phe) +19 4 . po-• t„muloida. (Am-) 4/1 PP- P- pung- goucc (00#0,000 - Spr, (~) SPL - Bitue penue /00/Acto (Cuo,af 1~•pag 8 0 PMN - a¥u/uu, or:gul¢#bno (Nont,•- Cottom•i - BM - 811*09 mentor,nall (Rod Ld *rbery) CAP - Colo,nogrolth (Kort Foer-r Ornam-gl 4 ~- PF - Pot,ntl» flutic- (Nati P-tWo) PM - Plnul mugo (Muge Pin*) - JOG - Inipent, chhnenall vId Gold' (Old Gold NOTES: 1. All areas disturbed by construction to revegetated with designated seed mixes < should be drilled to ensure better growth 2. TopsoN shall be stripped in areas" of , ond stockpiled to be redistributed to a c minimum when revegetation is begun. 3. AN seeded areas to be hydromulched 1 1/2 tons per acre. All seeded slopes 2:1 to be mulched and netted for erosic Strow bdes where needed to avoid erosit enhance growth potentic« 4. AN planting beds to be excavated to and backfilled to an elevation of 2" belo towns with soil mix consisting of: 1/3 tc pectmoss, and 1/3 existing soil. 5. Cover all planting beds with soil fabri, plant installation. 6. Install 3' wide cobble and gravel foun around all buildings. 7. AN trees shoN have a mulch ring 36" at the base of the tree. 8. AN tree rings and shrub beds to be i minimum depth of 31 material to be de owner. 9. Atl trees to be staked or guyed. TO. All trees and shrubs shaN be dr* Wi plant materials maintained in a heolthful 11. Conifer trees be sized as 50% eight 50% at six feet taN, Deciduous trees siz four-inch caliper and 50% at two-inch , 12. Placement of plant material that fn stalls shall conform to Estes Valley Deve 7.11.0.4.d plants within overhang of vehi N 30 0 30 SCALE 1" = 3C S 89'53'27" E 246.77' (MEAS.) p EAST 246.60' (PLATTED) ) FOR CONSTRUCTION L SEAL & SIGNATURE ON EACH SHEET D: 6/06/07 ED BY: RWS BY: RWS ED BY: KMP JMBER: ,05.001 4G NO. k.2 SHEET: ~ Ll.1 SaFERT ADomoN \ 4014 AMENDED 05 23/2007 NVId DNIdVOSONVI I / 0, D- , , 1 - . 1 ..,4. 0 . 1 ./ I. I li Ii- 1 1 . - . 6 I , 1 ------· . 0 0 . -74 =."''Alli-IM*7/, MA ~p-1B - 1'44yl/A'/il,WeadyIDS.-, , ,1 0 : .0 0 , ''. ,~. MiNI;1 ... , 1 . •4 010~1 10 4 /40* A ..'ll.'- .,4 -Evt. deur- 2.. I ./ 4 R. 'grow 66•11»1 '-1 3: 1*:I'O.'~ 0, - in 6-9 - U . --i-/4 / iliq- Il.r .- 1 .: D . A . 0 -2~. ' . .. ./.,9/11; :14, 6 F ar /e, - . E -/•I 51 /4~~~0~0//~~ '~' D . ... D , 11.~r 2 + . dil -0-" 0 00 '' '' 1/0 0 , O , ji /3my,~ 1,-i- 1, I :0 - 9 . . ,- 2<2 ' ~ ....1 1./0 mi, .9- i 4 4/.,q - 7.1rv 1 4ia***i~&:i,-~I 0 - :,77].*5=83€, , 1 1,-·IL I 0, - .,0 g. ..1 .¥ "*4*023*83.my-*7 1/ 2.44 b . 06% #* 95:321114) .t... + 70 - ~ 10 - . A - .f. d•li, m * .. '840/... . ..- I 4 V' ** --~dil f .. ..: 0 1 .2 , . I. . .1-7 ....... . 414 . ~~~~~~04~1~M-E-~- -0- 0 -, .- I. 1 I . . t. . 1, 0 1 1 - 1 , / 0 . -: /3 .......Il/*181/milill '11 4 - :... .1 2- ..7/m-,1*'I"=I" 504 ./-/ 1 0 , „:•m .1, -. ..... - 1- 0 -1.11 ---I'l W.. 4 « 31 1 - 9/ 44 4% ~1'~ ® 4 7 - -1 - 1. '::In 0. A, .. - 45 76 , * 1 4 1.1 -4 ... . 4 I. /27;E-1.,4/:f:/i•la/9/ \ litri ,- \,wi~ly#*cr-:~ - 001.M==- . .. ..4 04'.0/ .. 0 ...."~ 4 0 -I .- \ - -1.U -t?CI•154 .1 . ,. I - 07 ' . r.00 . .%484:4.4/~6-i#&.cr~ 0/j;e.~00001T'$'2 .. D . , 0 4= I . I .1 *~ ~ ~ ~~ I ..104 95:MELI---- 0~ . 1 7 , 3mt,/~. \~ . I. i 11 . , J 2 00\ £/3/* , .. 41 4 . .' , . .. I --I. I. I . - 1 * '4 · :. 434,4~0'f' , - 4: 34.- 1 . 21 ,. ... - '65.:- 0 I . , li~~vilillh 96'1: .. I 21 6 0; \ .. " , , '22hy : 10...11 .. .,r 1 *. 1. 98 -A \ 2.04,11 '.1 $ 2.1, - 14*1~(0 .- · · 1 1 . , /0,9.i. I ........ 1 .. f . 1*li*I i/ I - C. . =A Flti - ful# , r , ~ A/*43/M~ 2.fil . . 33 .. .u t~~0~~ " I . - U' 0, AA :.r, , ' 0/- ., 16..... -- .. 601=/ , 9,1/8 , .:~Al*. i f .. 1':40€[e-, --- lisilliallivill A- 6, . Vit- 1 :, , -- . 2 . . . "-7/~ '.m i\ . . : ,- " 0 , 11 ./. ·~Pimw · 3 . ' 0 - - , "181:"%~~~digh,&3*~9-~r'Ebil*/ , k ., ./f /:t 1 . A - r 4 ..2 &" . : . 1 0 , . 3,= 0 . I .. n .....&---'.4. A 1/ ---501,£ . . . O 0 - .. .. m .. ./ ./ 1 . - il ,-.