The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2007-06-19- FILE Copy ==- Prepared: June 13, 2007 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 19, 2007 ill:30 a.m._Study-Session-Rooms 201 and 204 Town Hall 1:30 p.m. Meeting-Board Room, Town Hall 1. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three minutes. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated May 15, 2007 b. AMENDED PLAT, Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision, & a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision, 225 Cyteworth Road, Gay G. Curlin/Owner, Van Horn Engineering/Applicant - Request to adjust the boundary line between two lots from an east-west orientation to a northwest-southeast orientation c. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, Kearney Subdivision, Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition, 1360 Brook Drive, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant - Withdrawn by Applicant d. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-01, Kearney Mini Storage, Proposed Lot 2, Kearney Subdivision, 1360 Brook Drive, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant - Withdrawn by Applicant 3. AMENDED PLAT, PARK LANE SUBDIVISION, Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, & a Portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park, 205 Park Lane Owner: Zach Wheatley and Richard Wood Applicant: Zach Wheatley Request: Combine five lots into one lot Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-08, PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT, Proposed Lot 1, Park Lane Subdivision, 205 Park Lane Owner: Zach Wheatley Applicant: Zach Wheatley, President, WAG Corporation Request: Remove the existing building and construct a 21,975-square-foot mixed-use building Continued on reverse -- 5. MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT, WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION, Metes & Bounds property, North End Storage Addition, 1775 Wildfire Road Owner: Ronald J. Gordon Applicant: Longs Peak Development, LLC Request: Divide one lot into two lots Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 6. REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05-08A, WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION, Proposed Lots 1 & 2, Wildfire Subdivision, TBD Wildfire Road Owner: Ronald J. Gordon Applicant: Longs Peak Development, LLC Request: Revise the existing development plan for mini storage units as follows: Proposed Lot 1: construct approximately 80 storage units. Proposed Lot 2: relocate existing house on Lot 1 to Lot 2; construct addition to existing warehouse; proposed use is for mechanical contractor, office, warehouse, employee housing. Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 7. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE: Section 4.3.C.5, Table 4-1: Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts regarding floor area ratio and lot coverage applicability; Section 7.1, Slope Protection Standards regarding development on steep slopes; Section 7.2, Grading and Site Disturbance regarding site disturbance standards; Section 7.11, Off-Street Parking and Loading regarding location of guest parking spaces; Section 7.11.0.5. Basins and Drainage Facilities regarding Larimer County Stormwater Control Manual applicability; Section 10.4.A2 regarding lot width, Section 10.5.H Exemptions regarding exemption for review of two-unit condominium projects; Appendix D.1. General regarding the Larimer County Road Standards Manual applicability; and Appendix D General Site Access regarding driveway design 8. REPORTS 9. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Estes Valley Planning Commission The next scheduled meeting will be held Tuesday, July 17, 2007. There are currently three items on the agenda. You can view information about all current submittals, including next month's Planning Commission items, on our web page: www. estesnet. com/comdev/Cu rrentReq uests. aspx t r 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DRAFT Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission May 15, 2007,1 :30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Betty Hull; Commissioners Wendell Amos, Ike Eisenlauer, Bruce Grant, Joyce Kitchen, Doug Klink, and John Tucker Attending: Chair Hull; Commissioners Amos, Eisenlauer, Grant, Kitchen, Klink, and Tucker Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott, Planner Shirk, Town Board Liaison Homeier, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: None Chair Hull called the meeting to order at 1:32 p.m. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence of the meeting. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission minutes dated April 17, 2007. b. AMENDED PLAT, Lots 39 & 40, Reed's Subdivision, Sharon Sperte/Applicant- Request to change the existing boundary line between two lots from a north- south orientation to an east-west orientation; no additional building sites are proposed c. AMENDED PLAT, Lot 3, Chiquita Subdivision & a Metes and Bounds Parcel located at 499 MacGregor Avenue, Trevor Speake/Applicant-Request to combine two parcels into one lot d. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, GRUEFF-EDWARDS SUBDIVISION, Lot 4, Stanley Historic District, Lot4ED, LLC/Applicant-Request by property owner (Town of Estes Park) to continue to July 17, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting e. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, KEARNEY SUBDIVISION, Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant-Request to continue to July 17, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting It was moved and seconded (GranUKIink) that the consent agenda be accepted, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff for items "b" and "c", and the motion passed unanimously. 4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 May 15, 2007 3. AMENDED PLAT, Proposed Park Lane Subdivision, Lots 9,10,11,12, & a Portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park, 205 Park Lane, Applicant: Zach Wheatley Planner Shirk stated the applicant has requested continuance of this item to the June 19, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Eisenlauer) to continue the request for an Amended Plat of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, and a Portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park to the Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting on June 19, 2007, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. CHARLES HEIGHTS, LOTS 4, 5, AND 10; 1130 Hill Road; Applicant: Warner Reeser, Jr. a. REZONING, LOT 4, FROM E-1-Estate to RE-Rural Estate b. AMENDED PLAT, LOTS 4, 5, AND 10 Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. This is a request to rezone Lot 4 from E-1-Estate to RE-Rura/ Estate zoning, to combine Lots 4 and 5, and to vacate a portion of right-of- way and dedicate easements. The access road to the property does not follow the platted right-of-way. Vacating the portions of the right-of-way and dedicating easements corrects this error and provides space for an emergency turnaround. This request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Comments were received from Town Attorney Greg White, Upper Thompson Sanitation District, and Larimer County Engineer Department, Health and Environment Department, and Assessor's Office. Comments were also received from neighboring property owner Mike Kellam regarding a labeling error on the plat. Public Comment: None. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Tucker) to recommend approval of the Rezoning of Lot 4, Charles Heights and the Amended Plat of Lots 4, 5, and 10, Charles Heights to the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners, and the motion passed unanimously. 5. KUNDTZ SUBDIVISION, Lot 1, Block 1, Fer~uson Subdivision & a Portion of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of S35-T5N-R73W of the 6~ P.M., 821 E. Riverside Lane, Applicant: Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley, Inc. a. REZONING FROM A-1-Accommodations to R-1-Residential b. MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT Commissioner Amos recused himself due to his membership on the Board of Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley and left the dais. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. This is a request by Habitat for Humanity to rezone a 0.70-acre parcel from A-1-Accommoda#ons to R-1-Residen#a/ zoning and to subdivide the parcel into three lots. Prior to the comprehensive rezoning in 2000, the property was zoned T-Tourist, which did not have a density limit. The rezoning will preclude accommodations development and any short-term-rental use of the property. It would allow one additional residential unit to be built and restrict the use to single-family residential. All three dwellings would be deed-restricted for a period of twenty years to DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 May 15, 2007 provide for attainable housing. The property is currently located in unincorporated Larimer County, and the plans were routed to county staff as part of the review. However, the applicant is requesting that the Town of Estes Park annex the property. If the property is annexed, the decision-making body for the rezoning and subdivision applications will be the Town Board. Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) Section 3.3.C requires rezonings to be necessary to address changes in conditions in the areas affected, be compatible and consistent with the policies and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and with existing growth and development patterns in the Estes Valley, and that service providers have the ability to provide adequate services and facilities. Planner Shirk stated median housing values have increased in the Estes Valley since 2000, "pricing out" residents who earn 80% of median income, which is the standard established by the EVDC to qualify for the R-1 zoning district. (Habitat for Humanity targets those whose income is 50% or less of median income.) The Comprehensive Plan encourages a variety of housing types and price ranges be integrated and dispersed throughout existing neighborhoods, encourages housing infill within the existing urban area, and ongoing identification of affordable housing opportunities; the proposal helps implement these policies. Adequate public facilities are available for this development. The EVDC requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet at the building line; proposed Lot 1 has a width of 67 feet. The applicant also requests a front-yard setback of 11.25 feet for proposed Lot 2 in lieu of the 15 feet required in the R-1 zoning district. Minor modifications must be granted by the Planning Commission for these requests to be approved; the EVDC allows the Planning Commission to grant up to a 25% modification to dimensional standards. Staff suggests granting these modifications helps implement goals in the Comprehensive Plan and relieves practical difficulty in developing the site. Each proposed lot exceeds the minimum required square footage of 5,000 feet. With the exception of these two requested minor modifications, the proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. The applicant proposes one driveway to serve all three units; planning staff recommends the driveway be assigned a street name to avoid confusion about the location of the western lot. Sidewalk will be constructed along Riverside Drive for eventual connection to the sidewalk system being developed along that road. An existing sewer line crosses the southeast portion of the site. The line will remain in place until a point just south of the proposed driveway. From that point north, a new main will be installed, and the lots will feed into this main; easements must be dedicated for the new lines. The proposed sewer plan must be reviewed and approved by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Any future residence on proposed Lot 3 will be located in the southern portion of the lot so that gravity-feed sewer service is possible; no lift station will be installed. An eighteen-inch water main also crosses the southeast portion of the site; the proposed easement for this line should be twenty feet rather than the fifteen feet proposed. Individual service lines will come from this main, and appropriate easements should be dedicated. One new fire hydrant is proposed and will be located south of the driveway just off Riverside Drive. The subdivider shall install electric service and a street-lighting system; electric lines and other utility services must be placed underground. The stormwater drainage plan was reviewed by the Larimer County Engineering Department, which requested more information regarding the off-site path of flow. The plan must verify and state that the increased flows from this site will not cause adverse impacts downstream at the RV park. Significant trees on the site shall be protected; if any significant trees are removed, now or in the future, replacement is required on a two-to-one basis, in accordance with EVDC Section 7.3, Tree and Vegetation Protection. The proposed landscaping satisfies the district-buffer requirements of the EVDC, although the Planning Commission may choose to require additional landscaping to increase buffering. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 May 15, 2007 This request was routed to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Comments were received from Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department, Town Attorney Greg White, Upper Thompson Sanitation District, and Larimer County Engineering Department, Planning and Building Services, and Department of Health and Environment. Written comments opposing the request were received from neighboring property owners Michael Meyer, Andrea Wildman, and Steven Piper. General concerns were decreased property values, increased density, overabundance of low- income housing concentrated in the area, traffic danger, loss of wildlife habitat, pets at large, junky yards. The Planning Commission must find that approval of a minor subdivision will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of the development code. In addition to requiring additional landscaping, the Planning Commission could choose to prohibit outdoor storage, prohibit or limit fencing on the property, and limit the number of vehicles that can be parked on the property. (The development code would allow four vehicles at each residence; the Planning Commission may impose more restrictive parking limits.) Planner Shirk read the staff findings found in the staff report and stated that staff recommends approval of the rezoning and minor subdivision requests. Discussion followed between Planning Commissioners and staff, summarized as follows. â€¢ The Town Board may not approve annexation of the property. â€¢ It is generally agreed that affordable housing does not negatively impact neighborhood property values when it is dispersed. â€¢ It appears unlikely that a lift station for proposed Lot 3 would be approved by the sanitation district, nor could one be required. â€¢ The site is currently zoned A-1, low-density accommodations, which allows residential use. The availability of accommodations units for the traveling public may decrease over time as accommodations-zoned condominiums are occupied for more of the year by future owner/retirees; however, the number of rooms available to travelers has increased dramatically in the last ten years. â€¢ The amount of accommodations-zoned property is limited, and the Planning Commission should exercise caution when considering rezoning from commercial (accommodations) use to residential use. â€¢ The subject property is not located on an arterial road. â€¢ The applicant proposes two parking spaces at each residence; the EVDC allows up to four vehicles per home. Future residents may park vehicles along the driveway. The Fire Chief has not expressed concern about emergency vehicle access to the proposed lots. Planning staff suggests further parking restrictions for this property. â€¢ There is no precedent for limiting parking specifically, but there is precedent for imposing restrictions on rezonings. â€¢ Code enforcement of zoning violations, i.e., parking violations, can be a lengthy process. Public Comment: Matthew Heiser, Habitat for Humanity (HfH) of Estes Valley Board Member, provided a brief description of HfH work in the Estes Valley. HfH offers the only single-family residential affordable housing program in the area. Owners purchase the residences from HfH; they are not transient. The proposed homes are in the scale and character of other residences in the neighborhood. Three much larger homes (up to 5,000 square feet) could be built on the property by any developer, provided one was designated as an attainable unit. HfH will provide benefit to the adjoining neighbor to the south by providing a sewer access easement. A lift station for proposed Lot 3 cannot be provided. The fire hydrant Mr. Shirk mentioned is already existing. Rezoning the property will increase landscape buffering by requiring district buffering along three property lines rather than the current RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 5 May 15, 2007 requirement for buffering along solely the western property line. HfH will create covenants for the subdivision to limit parking and outdoor storage and would welcome additional parking and outdoor-storage restrictions imposed by the Planning Commission. HfH builds quality homes and adds neighborhood value by installing public improvements such as paved road, sewer, etc. One small tree on proposed Lot 2 is planned for removal; HfH intends to preserve all other healthy trees on the properly. HfH is no different from a financial institution when it comes to legal ability to address complaints regarding zoning violations. It is not economically feasible for HfH to develop the property if fewer than three homes are built. Annexation to the town will provide a smaller required right-of-way width. Mr. Heiser contended that prior to adoption of the EVDC, there was no affordable housing zoning anywhere in the Estes Valley. The EVDC provides for the R-1 zoning district but did not designate any R-1 zoning with the valley-wide rezoning in 2000; therefore, it is implied to "go find it." While it might not seem good to have an HfH subdivision next to you, HfH is beneficial to the community because it creates homes for those who provide service support for the community. Neighboring property owners Steve Piper and Susan Fenton, 1161 Strong Avenue, and Andrea Wildman and Lew Townsend, 1121 Strong Avenue, each addressed the Planning Commission and expressed support for the goals and works of Habitat for Humanity but opposition to the requested rezoning and subdivision. Shared concerns include: â€¢ unkempt yards and excessive outdoor storage by owners of existing HfH homes in the Estes Valley; â€¢ too much density is proposed for the property; only one or perhaps two units should be developed on the lot; â€¢ approval of the requests will result in a high concentration of HfH homes in one neighborhood (four of the fourteen HfH homes in the Estes Valley); â€¢ property values will decrease; â€¢ an excessive number of vehicles will be parked on the property; â€¢ traffic safety will be compromised because the access point is close to a sharp curve where vehicles commonly speed; â€¢ HfH has no jurisdiction over the homes once they are sold into private ownership. Mr Piper and Ms. Fenton stated they cannot use their backyard because the dog at a neighboring HfH home runs loose and is threatening. Ms. Fenton was frustrated with the enforcement process when she contacted the town and was told to call the county. Ms. Wildman stated the applicant has requested a number of special considerations, including waiver of all fees, increased density, a change of zoning, reduced setbacks and lot width, and annexation. She encouraged full consideration of all factors and expressed concern that the application should require a special use review. Mr. Townsend questioned whether the application required review and approval of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment. He also expressed concern about impacts to wildlife that use the property and increased stormwater drainage off the site. Director Joseph stated the application has been reviewed following all required procedures as mandated by the Estes Valley Development Code. The "variances" are not required to be heard by the Board of Adjustment because the applicant's requests for minor modification are smaller than the 25% maximum variance to dimensional standards that the Estes Valley Development Code allows the Planning Commission to grant. Planner Shirk stated the requested modification to the lot width is due to a conflict in the development code language, which staff intends to correct. Leon Wiese, 831 Riverside Drive, stated he owns the adjoining property to the south. His sewer tap is located at the property line, and his service line does not extend onto the applicant's property. He expressed concern that an electric easement may not be shown on the plat and that the proposed gravity-feed sewer line for Lot 3 will not be functional. He objected to the reduced front-yard setback requested by the applicant for Lot 2 and the small, triangular-shaped building area remaining for a residence given the easements and setback requirements. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 6 May 15, 2007 Ed Mellars, no address given, stated he is working on the 6th Habitat home that he has helped construct. HfH homes are well-built and efficient; the most recently constructed home received a 5-star energy rating. Regarding vehicles that may be parked on the property, he stated twelve cars can't be parked on that lot because it isn't practical. Leta Nefzger, 1300 Mary's Lake Road, stated her property is not immediately adjacent to the site. She expressed a variety of concerns about storm drainage in the area and stated the water flows from the entire mountain across this property. She stated three houses on this lot are too many. Chair Hull called a recess at 3:35; the meeting reconvened at 3:46 p.m. Discussion among Commissioners and staff followed. Town Attorney White stated approval of the rezoning would require that the affordable housing guidelines provided in the EVDC be met; someone other than Habitat for Humanity may develop the property. Timing of the annexation request, right-of-way widths required by the town versus the county, and complaints and code enforcement were discussed. Town Attorney White stated if the requested zoning change is denied, there are no grounds for the minor subdivision request. Commissioner Klink stated the greatest burden of responsibility for the Planning Commission is when considering a change of zoning and noted the neighborhood is united in expressing concern about the proposed zoning change. Commissioner Kitchen noted two neighboring properties must agree to annexation before the applicant's property will be contiguous with current town limits. Commissioner Grant expressed his fundamental belief in affordable housing. It was moved and seconded (Klink/Tucker) to recommend denial of the request to rezone Lot 1, Block 1, Ferguson Subdivision & a Portion of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of S35-T5N-R73W of the 6~h p.M. from A-1-Accommodations to R-1-Residential to the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees, and the motion passed unanimously. 6. REPORTS a. Staff-Level Review - Development Plan 07-07, Rippling River, Metes and Bounds property addressed 2025 Moraine Avenue, Steve Eck and Steve Williams, Applicants. Planner Shirk stated the applicant had requested variances to reduce the required 50- foot river setback, to allow a corner of a building to be located in the required setback from an arterial road, and to allow construction of a driveway within the required at'terial setback. These requests were denied by the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment on May 1, 2006. The applicant's development plan was denied based on non-approval of needed variances. Because the applicant proposed construction of fewer than ten units (the number which triggers review by the Planning Commission), this was a staff- level review. There being no further business, Chair Hull adjourned the meeting at 4:07 p.m. Betty Hull, Chair Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary L L I , - Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and - ~ a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision Estes Park Community Development Department ~ Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue Ii--li~ ~-i-.- ~ PO Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION 1MEETING DATE: June 19, 2007 PRELIMINARY PLAT TITLE: "Preliminary Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision, Town of Estes Park, Portions of the East Half of Section 25, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado" LOCATION: The site is located at 225 Cyteworth Road, within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Gay G. Curlin/Same CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Amy Plummer, Van Horn Engineering, Inc. STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is an amended plat application to adjust the boundary line between two lots from an east-west orientation to a northwest-southwest orientation. This plat also dedicates easements for utilities, drainage, and access. Each lot is zoned "RM" Multi-Family Residential and each lot contains one single-family residence. Neither the existing nor proposed lot sizes are large enough for duplex or multi-family residential development. 1 1, II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels Existing Two Number of Parcels Proposed Two Parcel Number(s) 35254-06-011 (Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision) 35251-21-037 (Portion of Lot 21. Riverside Subdivision) Gross Land Area 17,564 sq. ft. Proposed Lot 1 0.403 acres 0.179 acres 7,787 sq. ft. Proposed Lot 2 Total 0.582 acres 25,351 sq. ft. Zoning "RM" Multi-Family Residential Existing Land Use Single-Family Residential Proposed Land Use Single-Family Residential SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard Yes - Steep slopes in some areas Wetlands No Streams/Rivers No Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat No LOCATION MAPS WITH ZONING AND ADJACENT LAND USES 0 '. SITE J m 4/ 1 e ~ 1 a . 7 44 1 ~ A.A# Page #2 -Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision UR" u 1-Famil Residential ei Undeveloped SF Single- amily (S SITE ''SF ~ "CO" Outlying Commercial Mixed / Commercial AERIAL PHOTO =P W ..1 4.1 R ..1 ..41,2 * E . 9 4.. W 2 7 - 9 0 119. I I - * 11' 1 f. '.0 1 I - hi + I. I .... t . 4 Â£ f ;'* 1 A , i. t_/ 4 # 1 1 4 .C I Squ 1 44â‚¬f , Â·/11 #,11 YTÂ·~ %r * . A'' . f - 4 3 ., '.'. 41 .tf J . 4 f .9 .#. Page #3 -Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision 1. 41 y .975%~Â» AMENDED PLAT proposed . ... c- ... >i Pro erty Line .- 1....~t 2 * Ac : 51- LOT 1 :, I -9.-*-133 9.,r R Existing 5 1./ , L---j--1\ 42.2 1 'C Property Line Â£54 ., ~ 03 # C --'~~. 0* -#1 x \ -4 / 1 LOT 2...re:I~- ' / lu,~3\ ' fil;, ,\ 1 -Â»40 ry 2,- /~a : 4 .CI V 47/ /2 Â£,3, 0...'.I 1 '. '91 4-1/Â»~ 1 -- . 1 I ./..-0. I=.--7 i / '01- 3 1 .' 1~ j \-- r ME- //0 f .i"'11, 1- - I / I lu' III. REVIEW CRITERIA All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, "Subdivision Standards," and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. For minor subdivisions, the EVPC shall also find that approval will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this Code. This application does not fall within the parameters of staff-level review, and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission in preliminary plat form and Estes Park Town Board in final plat form. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agencies and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. Legal notice has also been published in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette. The following written comments have been submitted. Estes Park Building Department See Will Birchfield's memo to Alison Chilcott dated May 25,2007. Page #4 -Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21. Riverside Subdivision 9 f Estes Park Public Works Department See Greg Sievers' memo to Alison Chilcott dated May 21, 2007. Estes Park Water Department See Jeff Boles' memo to Bob Goehring dated May 22,2007. Estes Park Light and Power Department See Mike Mangelsen' s memo to Bob Goehring dated May 23,2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letter to Alison Chilcott dated May 22,2007. Estes Park Sanitation District See Jim Duell' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated May 25,2007. V. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Minor Subdivision This is a minor subdivision application. Staff finds that approval of this application will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this Code, provided the recommended conditions of approval are satisfied. 3. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to reviewing agencies for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 4. Adjacent Property Owners No written comments were received. 5. Utilities and Utility Easements The water service line to the house on proposed Lot 1 should be shown and placed in an easement if it crosses proposed Lot 2. If the applicant wishes they could further define the term "overhead utility easement" for Town review and approval. For example, the height at which the easement starts could be clarified. Page #5 -Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision , r 6. Property Lines and Right-of-Way Staff and the applicant are working together to determine the final right-of-way alignment for Riverside Drive. This will involve some minor revisions to the lot line along Riverside Drive and dedication of a small portion of right-of-way near the thirty-inch Ponderosa Pine at the junction of Cyteworth Road and East Riverside Drive. 7. Shared Driveway Easement A shared driveway maintenance agreement should be submitted for Town review by the Revisions Due for Town Board date on the Application and Review Schedule. An agreement approved by the Town should be recorded with the amended plat. 8. Plat Title The plat should be given a new name rather than using an amended plat title that references two plats. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the application CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Compliance with Greg Sievers' memo to Alison Chilcott dated May 21, 2007. 2. Compliance with comment #2 in Greg White' s memo to Alison Chilcott dated May 22, 2007. To address comment #1, the dedication statement shall be revised to dedicate all new easements and right-of-way, if applicable, that are shown on the plat. 3. The water service line to the house on proposed Lot 1 shall be shown and placed in an easement if it crosses proposed Lot 2. 4. A shared driveway maintenance agreement shall be submitted for Town review by the Revisions Due for Town Board date on the Application and Review Schedule. An agreement approved by the Town shall be recorded with the amended plat. 5. The plat shall be given a new name rather than using an amended plat title that references two plats. Page #6 -Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to recommend approval of the application to the Town Board of Trustees with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the application to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance - findings). Note: Time frames for action on a subdivision or PUD application may be extended by the reviewers or Decision-Making Body when necessary to receive recommendations or reports from a reviewing agency, but no such extension shall exceed thirty (30) days unless the reviewing agency notifies the reviewer or Decision-Making Body that it needs more time to complete its recommendation. All other extensions of the time periods set forth in this Chapter for review and action on subdivision or PUD applications may be extended by the reviewers or Decision- Making Body only if the Applicant agrees in writing to an extension of time. DENIAL I move to recommend DENIAL of the application to the Town Board of Trustees because... (state reason for denial - findings). Page #7 -Amended Plat of Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision ..4. Cl MEMORANDUM To: Alison Chilcott, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: May 25,2007 Subject: Clatworthy Amended Plat Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision, & a portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision 225 Cyteworth Road The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for an Amended Plat for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. The Building Department supports a boundary modification between Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision and a portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision as requested in the application for an Amended Plat. C 1 Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Alison Chilcott, Planner From: Greg Sievers Date: May 21, 2007 Re: Clatworthy Amended Plat, Lot 11, Moccasin Sub., 225 Cyteworth, After reviewing the Amended plat the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: Due to the historic nature of this property and buildings, The Public Works Department wishes to accommodate the owners of this lot to the maximum extend feasible. Several portions of the EVDC don't seem to be physically applicable to this property. 1. No additional ROW is requested due to the existing bedrock wall along Riverside Drive, and the existing foundations of the house on the west edge of Proposed Lot 2. 2. Due to the historic discrepancy in location of the west property line, PW recommends the new west property line be at least 5' west of the existing home's foundation. The property can provide a slope easement if necessary. 3. The existing long triangle of property extending south to the street intersection should be accounted for in someone's ownership. It is of no interest to the Town as future ROW. 4. If all the adjoining property owners were interested the Public Works Department would entertain the option of vacating that portion of Cyteworth Road ROW. 5. It should be noted that the existing 30" Ponderosa tree at the street intersection (Riverside & Cyteworth) is dead. It will require removal in the near future. â€¢ Page 1 C. Water Department r- 7 /77 -= Inter-Office Memorandum Di [2 Ly [2 1-1 47 [2 -$ TO: Bob Goehring ~~ 'f|IN - 1 2007 From: Jeff Boles Date: 5/22/2007 Re: Clatworthy Amended Plat Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision & a Portion of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision 255 Cyteworth Road After review of the Amended Plat the Water Department has no comments. *ar ( t Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 05-23-07 Re: Clatworthy Amended Plat, 225 Cyteworth Road The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for an Amended Plat for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1) No comments 1 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 .oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 May 22,2007 ALISON CHILCO'ET, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Amended Plat - Clatworthy - Lot 11, Mocassin Subdivision Dear Ms. Chilcott: I have the following comments: 1. Cyteworth Road is shown on the Plat as an access, utility and drainage easement. The Dedication Statement dedicates "private easements for access". To avoid confusion the word private should be added on the Plat itself so that Cyteworth Road is in a "private access" easement. 2. The existing one story house located on proposed Lot 2 appears to be in the East Riverside setback. A statement shall be added to the Plat stating that approval of the Amended Plat does not alter the non-conforming status of that existing building. If you have any questions, please c~o not hesitate to give me a call. V~Truly Ypurs, / \ /61 LÂ»t / Greg~FA. White GAW/ldr CC Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Reetz Fax: 970/586-2459 C C aI L. F*2fVâ‚¬---1 Estes Park Sanitation District ~~l MAY 2 5 2007 ~ ~ PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 80517 18 11~-----_--1 1 May 25,2007 Alison Chilcolt, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 8051 7-1200 RE: Clatworthy Amended Plat - 225 Cyteworth Road Dear Alison Chilcott, Upon review of the proposed Amended Plat for the above mentioned properly the Dis- trict has the following comments: 1, The proposed lot line adjustments will have no impact on the District. 2. The sewer service line for the main house uses the utility easement shown as an access to our main line. The other unit drains to E. Riverside Drive. Thank you for the opportunily to comment on this review. Sincerely, C::Â»4 James Duell District Manager Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 LeÂ©] STATEMENT OF INTENT LOT 11, MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE EAST HALF OF Sec. 25-5-73 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Owner Gay Curlin is nearly finished restoring the two existing residences located on the above listed properties. Currently the dividing property line runs through both buildings. This amended plat seeks to alter the boundary line between the two parcels so that the buildings will comply with setback distances along the new boundary line, and each parcel will contain one of the residences. Both parcels are zoned RM-Multi family and no re-zoning is proposed. The size of the proposed lots are being kept about the same as the former lots, with new property corners falling at existing corners so as not to create more, potentially confusing monumentation. There are no variances being requested with this application. No further development is proposed at this point. There are no hazard areas identified by the Estes Valley Development Code that impact this lot configuration. Utilities serving the existing houses are all public and located as shown on the preliminary plat. An overhead utility easement will be created to encompass the existing overhead power line which runs from west to east across the properties. The existing paved road, Cyteworth Road, accesses Riverside Drive and serves several more properties beyond these two. An access and utility easement will be created with this plat along the Cyteworth Road alignment. Utility easements are proposed to cover existing utility service lines. No easements are proposed along the new dividing property line, nor along any of the outside boundary lines except as shown because of the hard rock outcroppings surrounding the buildings which prohibit burying underground utilities. A private access easement which encompasses the front portion of the existing parking area will allow easier pulling in and backing out. The subject lots are mapped as low to moderate wildfire classification according to the Estes Valley Development Code Wildfire Hazard Mapping. Depending upon which survey is honored, there could be a need to dedicate right-of-way. This survey honors lines which already represented the boundaries of right-of-way at one point of time or another, and no vacations are known other than the portion of Cyteworth Road north of the line which is 75' south of the southerly line of Lot 21, Riverside Subdivision. Therefore the plat does not show any right-of-way dedication because it could be argued that the right-of way already exists per one survey or another. 941 1-g, 4,71.g u '4/ ':--~ nu ; 1 Â£ 4 1 APR 2 5 2007 I ;3 , f ~Â·:- ~0: liti (0; ~fif J F, - r'.... :...0- ' ' -/*..l. *.*:I. p r ESTES VALLEY (- .. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION f 3 4 APR 2 5 2007 Submittal Date: ; ) asÂ»'- 2007 - 0 Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map Special Review f- ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition 1- Street Name Change 1- Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension 1- Supplemental Map f- Final Subdivision Plat F Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat 12 Amended Plat General Information Project Name Clatworthy Amended Plat Project Description Modify boundary between Lot 11, Moccassin Sub. and a portion of Lot 21, Riverside Sub. Project Address 225 Cyteworth Road Lot Legal Description // Moccassin Sub. and a portion of Lot 21, Riverside Sub. 30104-06.on Parcel ID # .4 35251-21-037 Section 25 Township 5N Range 73W , Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 0.6 h Existing Land Use Sinjl.- Ta-,~ilf rzsidu~hiL Proposed Land Use sw+-, fanulj rz.,ue.6'J Existing Water Service 9 Town E Well E Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service P Town F Well E Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service 12 EPSD r UTSD F Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service P EPSD r UTSD r Septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes P No Existing Gas Service F Xcel F Other 15? None Existing Zoning RM Proposed Zoning RM Site Access (if not on public street) Cyteworth Road Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes 12 No Has site staking been completed? F Yes 7 No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Amy Plummer Mailing Address 1043 Fish Creek Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 i Attachments Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan ' 11" X 17"reduced copy of plat or plan Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park a P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue .a Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev ~1~ ilil ~ 1111. 0 . . N... - Primary Contact Person is r Owner E Applicant P ConsultanUEngineer Record Owner(s) Gay G. Curlin Mailing Address 1714 Shoreham Dr., Montgomery, AL 36106 Phone 970-586-4887,334-244-2039 Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Same as engineer Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Van Horn Engineering and Surveying, Inc. h ;~- -- tÂ·-' Wi\, 1.4 70 j 4 l] \W~ E-- 3% A ' i 11.4 Mailing Address 1043 Fish Creek Road, Estes Park, CO 80517 ~' ~f~<Â· :~ Phone 970-586-9388 1 APR 2 5 2007 1. :1 :46 Cell Phone '' 4-11 1 , Fax 970-586-8101 F. Email vheaairbits.com APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule. pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT: Gay G. Curlin Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Amy Plummer Signatures: 00 A. Record Owne 61 UWA/0 Date Il- 15-go Applicant I U 0 649/ut- Date 4-26 -07 \J â‚¬ I 4 1 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowled~ and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. * In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). 4 I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWDevCode.) I I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. 4 I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. 4 The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT.Â· Gay G. Curlin Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Amy Plummer Signatures: O A. I Recoido@ne(-_ '~0'- ' C "~1~1.L~~/4,~ : Ba-te) I l-- 26 - O,6 Applicant â‚¬fK- 1,4_ - Date 4 -26-07 e=Â«-- 1 11 , - ; Ill ., 10 ij:fl *PR 25. y I, fi . tf~ f f Revised 10/13/06 C C . C=.- C= Co E *1& matour)G h h h 120 r. h 898% 0 >X (\1 91 1 00000 00.- 25 2 53 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 4 0 0 900 Â¥ 8 0&goo 0000 0 0000 -QOÂ©0000 0000 bE J Z jd *U 00 ja 2 02 lizatÂ¥#yawiliff 5% @1@milizE#@Emot 0 C SM=03Mine jo@ 8 a fj aMM,22 a) m co 9 -8 00- Re,)(D Z m 2 (9 (D 4- CV =2&39 w * ve.-SC>NUDOO LO O (0 5 - AC\10000 6 6% Wi â€ž e g O a *â€žâ€ž 2 0 &0 woo m z :20 0 1% A Or tO O N - - O. A Q. O. CU - - CD O. Q. O.O_ Q. CD .U) I - 5 9 J (D S..C Z O E AN@.53 2022 0-* %2ma & 0606 1 EN~id&5 1 1 1% m Yr ft @Ef22~ rd g& LO#22#ggEâ‚¬iN@ 001Â£<E 00 6 Z LL > O 25 LUCD J< B LU OCD June Boon 2306 Cotswo~denC'e~~w Fort Collins, CO 80526 80517 67846 Mei Chi Lee 80517 Cherie Collins , ND 58703 Lovell , 80517 Owner 11 Address City, State, Zip JA Feddersen Reed/Marett/Parsons ontro e, CO 8 O 'MJed selsa 002 L xO8 Od >lied Sal JO UAA01 Cathleen Larson ulch Road aria Lin Johnson tkin Avenue r Wells Thomas & Andrew Wykstra, Patricia -1 7 Buttonwood Drive sabeth Whannel Parliament Court Wid pepuall]Â¥ X4UOAAwlo & Stanley Fisher a/Douglas Harris Kathy & Sh Patricia Kohler pect Mountain Village, Inc. Donna Pieper - 00 SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE. CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION: 1, LONNIE A. SHELDON, A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STA1E OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY PRELIMINARY CLATWORTHY AMENDED PLAT CERTIFY THAT THIS CLATWORTHY AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 11, MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GAY G. CURUN BEING THE OWNER OF A Null 1 1 LOT 21 RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SEC11ON 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST, OF A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. OF LOT 11 MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO 01 4 1 WIT: AND A PORTION OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION THAT PART OF LOT 21 LYING EAST OF THE BASE LINE AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING LONNIE A. SHELDON UNE: BEGINNING 187 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE, REG. LAND SURVEYOR #26974 TOWN OF ESTES PARK ESTES PARK. THENCE NORTH 25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 5'50' WEST TO NORTH LINE OF LOT; LESS TO SPENCER AS IN BOOK 802 PAGE 430. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF PORTIONS OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 COLORADO. ~ AND LOT 11, MOCASSIN, ESTES PARK NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, CONTAINING 0.609 ACRES MORE OR LESS; HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS CAUSED THE COLORADO. AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 11, MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION AND A PORT1ON OF LOT 21 RIVERSIDE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND MODIFIED INTO 2 LOTS AS SHOWN ON THIS CLATWORTHY BEARING STATEMENT: SUBDIVISION. TOWN OF ESTES PARK AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE PERPETUAL PRIVATE EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS AND UTILITIES, AND PERPETUAL PUBUC EASEMENTS FOR THE BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE INSTAUATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE AS ARE LAID OUT AND h NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE STH P.M. FROM DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT, WITNESS OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS to THE CENTER 1 /4 CORNER METAL CAP TO THE 1" PIPE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 21, DAY OF 20_ ~2 RIVERSIDE SUBDMSION BEARS S89'50'00"W, MATCHING THE BEARING OF THE SAME LINE AS CALLED OUT ON THE MAP OF THE CLATWORTHY PROPERTY SURVEYED BY DEAN BABCOCK SEPT.- OCT. 1942 AND J0 REVISED AUG. 1950 BY JOHN P. RYAN, JR. GAY G. CURUN <* STATE OF COLORADO) 022 )SS ZOR COUNTY OF LARIMER) 4 Ze THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 20- BY GAY G. CURLIN. /632809 Zu, | 1 PORTION OF L~T 22, i WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL , g:#*si I 1 _"BASELINE" ACCORDING MY COMMISSION EXPIRFS . ~*~ ~ w RIVERSIDE SUB[~IVISION 1 d~ TO THE CORRECTED RM MULTI-FMMILY j- 1 PLAT OF RIVERSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZbNING , SUBDIVISION I ~ FOUND 1 " PIPE L-k-J ,-~ ZE00 PORTION OF LOT 22, (S 81'00' 581'22'41"E | FOUND #4 REBAR W/ 1" RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION 54.20' (57.22 E) 1 PLÂ¢STIC CAP #6499 (IN ROCK) R RESIDENTIAL ZONING FOUND #4 REBAR {S86'43'29"W} NOTARY PUBLIC 9*e, 2~G t~ wwÂ£ 175.40'} SURVEYOR' S NOTES: 4~*44 -2 w 1 0 2.- 1 (15.03 - /.-0- r-9/44 .1- I Z 15.00' NO 1 1. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE USED FOR RESEARCH FOR THIS PlAT: S W .1 1 PORTION O LOT 21, - 4 &, FOUND #4 REBAR K DATED MARCH 23, 2005 1-*/* A Â· ~ RIVERSIDE S BDIVISION K - OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S THLE COMMITMENT NO. FIF250531645 N8254'07"W 149.96' 1 . 111 1 "78 --\ \0144.443-ZE36x-34...â„¢2Â» m W/ 1 " PLASTIC - THE CORRECTED PLAT OF RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK /=.e-dreilk A ili RM MULTI AMILY 9 1 CAP #6499 - THE PLAT OF MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL ZONING 1 42 '052 9 R - E~~1 LOT 1, - THE MAP OF THE FRED P. CLATWORTHY PROPERTY SURVEYED SEPT.- OCT. 1942 BY DEAN BABCOCK, RLS, AND REVISED BY JOHN P. RYAN IN AUGUST OF 1950. A NOTE ON THE MAP SAYS THAT BOOK 802 PAGE 430 \ e=0 CYTEWORTH \H \ 8 /1 CLATWORTHY TO LOT 1 0% S J RESUBDIVISION E.W. WALLACE, TOWN ENGINEER AT THE TIME, APPROVED THE SOUTH BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. - BOOK 798, PAGE 498: A 1945 QUFTCLAIM DEED FROM SPENCER TO CLATWORTHY O 1/ 8. SPENCER QUITCLAIM 17,575 SF Â§- g d R RESIDENTIAL ZONING - BOOK 802, PAGE 430: A 1946 QUITCLAIM DEED FROM CLATWORTHY TO SPENCER % 1# WRD JAN. 1946 0.404 ACRES 13.42 , &.: 4. s ...... 1 19- 1, 0 00, 2, THIS AMENDED PLAT HONORS THE ORIGINAL WESTERLY UNE OF LOT 11 AND WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2, MOCASSIN SUBDMSION BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION AND A UNE 75' ' Eli *a m} - 5/e#Â· SOUTH OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 21. THIS CREATES A RIGHT-OF-WAY BOUNDARY ALONG RIVERSIDE 1. MI \ 0 0.- PORTION OF LOT 21, 4004- DRIVE WHICH PARALLELS THE PAVEMENT APPROXIMATELY 12' TO THE EAST. THIS ALSO ALLOWS FOR LOT 2, ' 111 4 h b \ MOCASSIN SUBDMSION TO BE A PORTION OF A PARCEL WHICH INCLUDES LOTS 2 AND 4 OF MOCASSIN \1 1.22 RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION gw. 17,761 SF =0.407 ACRES 0070 .3,0 SUBDMS10N AS SHOWN IN THE LARIMER COUNTY REC0RDS. ...1# f \ RM MULTI-FAMILY 404 44 064 -56/ 3. THIS PLAT HONORS THE TRUNCATION OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 11, MOCASSIN SUBDMSION, WHICH UES -0.-4 ,Â·5'1 : LOT 2 4 ISHED RESIDENTIAL ZONING 1 ./ 8948 SF -1 1---1 330 00 / 1 0. TO THE SOUTH OF THE UNE 75' SOUTH OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 21. THIS WAS AGREED UPON \\ .31& 111.:,r \ f 0.205 ACRES ~ OHE -OHE -OHE --~33-~:~~ CYTEWORTH ROAD) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LINE 75' SOUTH oF SAID SCUTHERLY LiNE OF LOT 21. BY THE TOWN ALONG WITH THE VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ClATWORTHY LANE (NOW NAMED A // # 9 2 APPROXIMATE * - --G-"Â£ -=1 44 01/ -CHE -OHE 10' OVERHEAD *--- 0.- ***Â£.T~ f k FOUND #4 REBAR 4. THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF MOCCASIN SUBDMSION SPELLED "MOCCASIN" WITH TWO 'C'S' AND ONE "SL NO f PROPERTY LINE AS /- 1 .9. 1 W/ 1 " PLASTIC BUT SUBSEQUENT SURVEYS AND THE CURRENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION SPELL IT WITH ONE V AND TWO 7'SÂ». ~ BOOK 798, 1 g.fly CORRECTED PLAT OF 4 CAP #9485 THIS PLAT CONSIDERS THEM ONE AND THE SAME. 1 7 ;1 SHOWN ON THE UTILITY EASEMENT 0 PAGE 498, *PENCER TO . \ 1 jv +189 RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION 0 A CLATWORTH'( QUITCLAIM / 0* 1 4. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN ~|OV. 1945 ~~ b CLIP,As 91 5123~1~.2f--4 *-. . 65>,1. *ASâ€ž THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS OF THE DATE YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY Iz_Ls*~-4- 296, ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE ce 9881%Â§~~F'Ze, T STATEMENT: 00. 225 CYTEWORTH_ROAD- 10- 1j .444*22 $ 'f:n~/-50# 4 - e 68 4 *gy4941.2/ 87,0.-EXIGTING- -2 3TORY 08- ,../.. I V 0 /,~ 43% BOUNDARY UNES INDICATED ON THIS MAP ARE ADJUSTMENTS OF FORMER BOUNDARY UNES OF THE pt CO \ .1.:.,1/.i. ...\ 8. 24 1 . .3-- Â·. 1~--~~ Â· Ul _NB'00 89~ HOUSE E 5 i +320921:FIE)*filiviii. - 6.4 4 PROPERTY DEPICTED HEREON. SUCH ADJUSTMENTS DO NOT CREATE ADDITIONAL LOTS OR BUILDING I Y 4 NIE (N82'23 E 1 53;51 - = J SITES FOR ANY PURPOSES THE AREA ADDED TO EACH LOT SHOWN HEREON BY SUCH ADJUSTMENT ~ $89'50'00"W \ ~- ~ 1 - SB 0'00"W 187.37' 00 --Pips ....t...:..t:Â«Er.,1 4 IS TO BE CONSIDERED AN ADDITION TO SHALL BECOME A PART OF AND SHALL BE CONVEYED E-4 04 399.38' 11 .. - ... --- â€¢ - ./FORMER PROP TY LINEVZ ( T 187') ---+2~02:.*445bRi.k::::v TOGETHER WITH, EACH LOT AS SHOWN. EXISTIAG 1 , LOT 11, MOCASSIN 44, FOUND i" PIPE,\ \-STORY HOUSE 8762,SF -0.201 ACRES 4 94 1 S , SUBDIVISION . G?%- 129.0.~ 9, 112 -/Al\-r,4 4/ t-~~4 I .**91:t:. 45'W' ~ COR.yER-0-Â«912 1 - 4% S 2RES!~Ef#AL ZONING g&' b'~ ~~4, *4â‚¬*Fato 17 RM MULTI-FAMILY -ip RIVERSIP O jf- ' @UBDIVIstÂ¢tN ti>;+ *tlt ~+4~* UND BOARD OF TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE 64 1 7ER st*p-â‚¬ le K 01- 1.61. > 7 04600. 04 99 + 0 ir *,9 c./ *ber<~2 4 - 23. 21 45 3 " PIPE gt APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, . PRO RTY LINg A~ SHOWN > 40* 4 Â· ' + L F ED P. ~CLA~WORTHY . .. A 9 4 Â·~~ ~ lii''I;64/409/0694#85*/53241 ./40' COLORADO BY A RESOLUTION ON THIS _ DAY OF , 20- ~ -1~ ON TH 1950 'MAP OF THE . b / B 4'40. S. U.4 P#OPERTY ~ Â·t \ / h TOWN CLERK MAYOR i I ~ '9 PROPE TY L~IE 4 SCALED ./' 4 - -eaG...~ 42<4~# 4 ~.-e/lxÂ·,3863.Â·*:~:;*stkt:5:41#~Â¢94*"~- FROM 961 IMPROVEMENT (EÂ¥18 1 .31 1\ i JeÂ£10?~Ed <4 / LOT 4, MOCASSIN ~ ~ PLAT Al,PINE VILLAGES / 1 2 S-L--1-- 8...gl W ICH DEPI(?TS THE r \ . t SUBDIVISION ORIGIN L DIMENSIONS OF C Â® \ 34 \ 11 s.-9Alifls X .9-,;t'****A â€¢ 2~~* 'Â· .-- - R RESIDENTIAL APPROVAL OF 1HIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE MOC ASI~ SUB~IVISION ~-1 1 -Â·L- L.letc,2'43 ,â€¢1--~#g::Â·2*.2 *r- 0.4& 7 ZONING \ '.0 ~#. 4 7,6 7*1 44' 'A 1~ 2 3 1 15'40*f d_ Â·8421::4?61Â£J'/ -d'ke'.0. /0 7 i Alf*/4~ 1 * gre / 4 A ~ APROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE \ / \211 EWER EASEMENT / 2-02<41 tÂ«Â«e 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. ~ AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF V LE*EMU I i 25.59....,.:.6â€¢..5~0-, ~ / - MOCCASIN SUBDIVISION 2.. / 0' POWER POLE 1 11 - t. 4: 1 |- il &0' Â·Â·Â·Â· -i ,- 1 26Â· -AL, SF0206'2 I N r.-- ../-4 I <tipt 22.29 i**1,#-4/~pe:::, \ /\ 0 WATER VALVE co.. r (N Â£ 'E 54') 7 ~ A â€¢19.47' ,2>PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN (22') ON THE 1950 MAP OF THE -W- WATER LINE 461 Â· 11 1 . f 920* 14,ON; J j X 11 322.38 .ij 46. 4 -- FRED P. CLATWORTHY 1 1 1 1 .M # * . 4 PROPERTY Â® SEWER MANHOLE 4022'30'_-- . 0 - d LOT 1, MOCA! SEWER CLEAN( i SUBDIVISION - S - SEWER LINE *~0 1 2/t. e /~ RM MULTI-FAMILY / RESIDENTIAL ZONING -OHE- OVERHEAD UTIUTY LINES DRAWN BY: S / 4 00/ Â· 1/ N 1 P OCE P - G - APPROXIMATE BURIED GAS LINE ADDmg41 i 2 0' / ~ 1 1 CHECKED BY: 25/ / I LAS SCALE 1"=20' 1 1 j nomoN 04-24-2007 CRAGS DATE: 1 1,/ f lim CRAGS ./CIED.,E SHEET l Â·Â· . 1 l SUBD. EDERS SCALE: 1" = 20' 00.00 MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS SUB. S / 1 1 00.0, DIMENSIONS PER THE MAP OF THE 0 20 40 60 CLATWORTHY PROPERTY AND OWNER: SEC 25, â„¢I 4 1 QUrrCLAIM DEEDS RECORDED GAY CURLIN - - - 4 4 2 1 1945/1946 1714 SHOREHAM DR. SEC 38, IAN < 1 PLATTED DIMENSIONS PER THE VICINITY MAP MONTGOMERY, AL 36106 oF / + [00.0] PLAT OF MOCCASIN SUBDMSION j VAN HORN ENGINEERING CONTACT: :/ 100.00} PLATTED DIMENSIONS PER THE PLAT AMY PLUMMER 10 - 8000 OF THE CYTEWORTH RESUBDMSION \ PROJ. NO. , / / \ 2003-12-06 Fi NOISIAEIhl SN0ISIA3hl BONIM LO-90-9 .LVId GEGNIMV SNIA3 1.01.9-99 :XÂ¥3 * 89Â£6-9 SQ'00'W) Oad 0350d088 10 NOLLHOd NOLLOGIS 1031'Obld SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE. 1, LONNIE A. SHELDON, A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CLATWORTHY- AMENDED PLAT CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATIONÂ·, CERTIFY THAT THIS AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 11, MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION AND A PORT1ON OF LOT 21 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GAY G. CURUN BEING THE OWNER OF A RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A OF LOT 11 MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST. SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO AND A PORTION OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION LONNIE A. SHELDON TOWN OF ESTES PARK UNE: BEGINNING 187 FEET EAST OF THE SOUâ„¢WEST CORNER OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE, THAT PART OF LOT 21 LYING EAST OF THE BASE UNE AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING REG. LAND SURVEYOR #26974 ESTES PARK, THENCE NORTH 25 FEET: THENCE NORTH 5'50' WEST TO NORTH LINE OF LOT; LESS TO SPENCER AS IN BOOK 802 PAGE 430. COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF PORTIONS OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 COLORADO. NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, AND LOT 11, MOCASSIN. ESTES PARK CONTAINING 0.60 ACRES MORE OR LESS; HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS CAUSED THE SAME COLORADO. TO BE SURVEYED AND MODIFIED INTO 2 LOTS AS SHOWN ON THIS AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 11. MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF LOT 21 RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF BEARING STATEMENTÂ· ESTES PARK AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE PERPETUAL PRIVATE EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS AND UTILmES, AND PERPETUAL PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLAnON AND BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE MAINTENANCE OF UTIUTIES AND DRAINAGE AS ARE LAID OUT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS h NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 73 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. FROM PLAT. WIâ„¢ESS OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS DAY OF W@ THE CENTER 1/4 CORNER METAL CAP TO THE 1" PIPE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 21, 20- RIVERSIDE SUBDMSION BEARS 589'50'00"W, MATCHING THE BEARING OF THE SAME LINE AS CALLED OUT 00 ON THE MAP OF THE CLATWORTHY PROPERTY SURVEYED BY DEAN BABCOCK SEPT.- OCT. 1942 AND REVISED AUG. 1950 BY JOHN P. RYAN, JR. GAY G. CURUN 4 STATE OF COLORADO) 1 )SS COUNTY OF LARIMER) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF . 20- BY GAY G. CURUN. 1 PORTION OF LOT 22, l Â¥4TNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION "BASELINE" ACCORDING MY COMMISSION EXPIRFS 1 - TO THE CORRECTED PLAT OF RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION - f Ze FOUND 1 " PIPE NOTARY PUBLIC l PORTION OF LOT 22, 964. W. S81'22'41"E ~ FOUND #4 REBAR W/ 1" RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION 32*kit .. (S 81'00' PLASTIC CAP #6499 (IN ROCK) FOUND #4 REBAR is86'43'29"Wl 54.20' (57.2') 0 1 (S82'15'E 166.0') {75.40'} SURVEYOR' S NOTES: 15.00' --x<- - / (15.0,) 3 --,--.1---- 82 1. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE USED FOR RESEARCH FOR THIS PLAT: kÂ» f. PORTION OF LOT 21, ~ .7---- RE*I XE~ 3- 4 -2--*--.-*-r-.-L=-.5-4**rk-*4*.410~NED#*â€ž2~1.Â·~.zif\-~~Â· 3- - OLD REPUBUC NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S TITLE COMMITMENT NO. FTF250531645 RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION ~ P ~gg - - C. FOUND #4 REBAR * DATED MARCH 23,2005 N82.54'072" 149.*842<~<ZN.....%Â·<D<.- 4.-4 3.~ M W/ 1" PLASTIC - THE CORRECTED PLAT OF RIVERSIDE SUBDMSION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK ~ ~~~~Â«rk-.- CAP #6499 11 <Pli# - THE PLAT OF MOCASSIN SUBDIVISION - LOT 1. Â·p , - THE MAP OF THE FRED P. CLATWORTHY PROPERTY SURVEYED SEPT.- OCT. 1942 BY DEAN ,-Z CYTEWORTH 7 BOOK 802 PAGE 430 BABCOCK, RLS, AND REVISED BY JOHN P. RYAN IN AUGUST OF 1950. A NOTE ON THE MAP SAYS THAT 1 ,Â« CLATWORTHY TO LOT 1 .3 59 RESUBDIVISION 3 04 E.W. WALLACE, TOWN ENGINEER AT THE TIME, APPROVED THE SOUTH BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 9/ 8 '0 SPENCER QUITCLAIM 17,575 SF - BOOK 798, PAGE 498: A 1945 QUITCLAIM DEED FROM SPENCER TO ClATWORTHY JAN. 1946 0.404 ACRES 21 4 2 2. THIS AMENDED PLAT HONORS THE ORIGINAL WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 11 AND WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2, 5 1 0.4 8 5 MOCASSIN SUBDMSION BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 21, RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION AND A UNE 75' 1 8 / e ff ./3- bt E SOUTH OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 21. THIS CREATES A RIGHT-OF-WAY BOUNDARY ALONG RIVERSIDE 1, 31 . - 0, DRIVE WHICH PARALLELS THE PAVEMENT APPROXIMATELY 12' TO THE EAST. THIS ALSO ALLOWS FOR LOT 2, tS PORTION oF LOT 21, MOCASSIN SUBDMSION TO BE A PORTION OF A PARCEL WHICH INCLUDES LOTS 2 AND 4 OF MOCASSIN ~ -0 RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION .i / E SUBDMSION AS SHOWN IN lHE LARIMER COUNTY RECORDS. 00 17,761 SF =0.407 ACRES . 1â‚¬33' 40 "5â‚¬6 i f LOT 2 s 563*0' 03 râ‚¬1 3. THIS PLAT HONORS THE TRUNCATION OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 11, MOCASSIN SUBDMSION. WHICH UES .tc) ~61 '561, TO THE SOUTH OF THE UNE 75' SOUTH OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 21. THIS WAS AGREED UPON 1 (06. BY THE TOWN ALONG WIIH THE VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CLATWORTHY LANE (NOW NAMED 8948 SF d, * CYTEWORTH ROAD) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE UNE 75' SOUTH oF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LCT 21. 0.205 ACRES C. 1 1- 9 - APPROXIMATE --- .h 4. THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF MOCCASIN SUBDMSION SPELLED *MOCCASIN~ WITH TWO "C'S" AND ONE "S". 10' OVERHEAD / f Z FOUND #4 REBAR PROPERTY LINE AS UTILITY EASEMENT-7 --/ / 0 W/ 1 " PLASTIC THIS PLAT CONSIDERS THEM ONE AND THE SAME. BUT SUBSEQUENT SURVEYS AND THE CURRENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION SPELL IT WITH ONE "C" AND TWO "S'S". SHOWN ON THE /<1 1 CAP #9485 L/ BOOK 798, PAGE 498, SPENCER TO R~RER~DTE DSUPB~~MSI~N * / 4. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN CLATWORTHY QUITCLAIM 6 %34,21? / //\ --. NOV. 1945 42 0- Â·0'03--1 * THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS OF THE DATE YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY 0 0404 / 9 L 573/ 93.1 ------~<< - ~ ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE 0-I- CERTIFICATION DATE SHOWN HEREON. O 12 _--- ./ I I dt o. dt~ ---6 187.0'__---------- A , 84<fix:11> A El--* /43* 113'49.20 Ul IC- BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT STATEMENT: - CO / .....4 N 2 .fe I /-- PROPERTY DEPICTED HEREON. SUCH ADJUSTMENTS DO NOT CREATE ADDITIONAL LOTS OR BUILDING // 4-- __- _NA;=013.- - e , S89'50'00"W 187.37' ...... BOUNDARY LINES INDICATED ON THIS MAP ARE ADJUSTMENTS OF FORMER BOUNDARY LINES OF THE E-1 AS TIE (N8223'E 189') S89'50'00"W ;... ./19 ............... SITES FOR ANY PURPOSES. THE AREA ADDED TO EACH LOT SHOWN HEREON BY SUCH ADJUSTMENT / FORMER PROP TY LINE (EAST 187') Im Z % - IS TO BE CONSIDERED AN ADDmON TO, SHALL BECOME A PART OF, AND SHALL BE CONVEYED 399.38' FOUND 1" PIPE, SW . * ~- SUBOMSION / LOT 11. MOCASSIN -,1.,2*f 4+41:r..Pr.*4*.*.....+++.+ + 1.29 P) TOGETHER WITH, EACH LOT AS SHOWN. i CORNER LOT 21, 1 -- \ 4:4.:v~prpa- 8762 SF =0.201 ACRES 139Â£\ 5 ex:93*SE:i:i:i:r:I:F., -5 *' RIVERSIDE \ E-1 SUBDIVISION . +... \ 94:bo. " PIPE BOARD OF TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE \\ e PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN-7 APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, 4/ A + I 5. w11 109 Â»44%.4% C ON THE 1950 MAP OF THE / .*- i r FRED P. CLATWORTHY - / @ '~~43Â«b. 683 N COLORADO BY A RESOLUTION ON THIS _ __ _ DAY OF , 20_. PROPERTY 'b.14 /2 * S:- ..49 Â· ~ 0 -4.24 .......... Iiâ‚¬979. Â· r r. +:al.04* 5, 84 ce 0 0 PROPERTY LINE AS SCALED < - '*.*+54*****:***Â¥913,9 FROM 1965 IMPROVEMENT i ~I- - 42611*22-<t.: 7. ' '0)3:.38i:i::tr. ~+:.:*:Â·:Â·:.:+:s,4~*LOT 4, MOCASSIN 0 PLAT OF ALPINE VILLAGES / V sli:i:i:i:*:i:il:*:I:. ki:ifif~ , WHICH DEPICTS THE ...., *. 1~***,. * SUBDIVISION 7 - ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS OF ~ ~ZTE,Q_.BiGL~~TA.rÂ£~,MI <4 2178'0Â£43*W \ 6/:E:i:>:iittÂ·jiâ‚¬12 - MOCCASIN SUBDIVISION --- ,k<,Â·.*,+~~}k~*i-<I~*~ 4*'~3~ TOWN CLERK MAYOR APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE , \1â‚¬p 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. 4 4. 4 7 15'40 9i; - # AUK*.44 -+4 SCALE: 1" = 20' FEWER EASEMENT (Â£3 40 4, /7.,g.:,voy 20 40 60 i F . oxÂ·:.:+67Â£1.49 ~4) A - APROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE !34 i.'' *4/ - Q AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF F,S .1 ......le# 25.59'S Â·r:~:â€¢>N, \ 7----3 MOCCASIN SUBDIVISION 0 ~ 22.24'4Â· 47,8~ ~kclti'*85,02'O6~E~- '*- 1 N tÂ·S-Â· 1 rzEr- (N89 'E 54') -12~ A 19.47' 33>-PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN c* 2 529 110,0731 \\C) FRED P. CLATWORTHY - ON THE 1950 MAP OF THE ~ PROPERTY 1 BUENNA 2 2 LOT 1 MOCASSIN ~ ar m a. EI %'?h ~ SUBDN\%\ON LEGEN11 f O.Ok -0 DRAWN BY: r LEE AND ALPSI I ALP 2 4#0 ~ CHECKED BY: LAS 2*g=UL V..21'q,&f~\ IOCK ~,â€¢COSER:~ 4 UDGE SCALE 529'" 1 4[05k my' tur)\ ESTATE 1"=20' 00.00 MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS DATE: ISUB.JI-0/'~RAGS r <~ /- \/ ADDmON 04-11-2007 (00.0) DIMENSIONS PER THE MAP OF THE PINEE C[ATWORTHY PROPERTY AND 11~R CRAGS ..ED.E U - SHEET SUBD. *D 8 QUITCLAIM DEEDS RECORDED ~ EDERS C <N j 1945/1946 S = uo 1 PLAT OF MOCCASIN SUBDIVISION GAY CURUN ; -se-30, 15N #91 g PLATTED DIMENSIONS PER THE OWNER: SEC 25. TON ' [00.0] - a 100.00} PLATTED DIMENSIONS PER THE PLAT 1714 SHOREHAM DR. - --3 OF MONTGOMERY. AL 36106 VICINITY MAP W OF THE CYTEWORTH RESUBDIVISION VAN HORN ENGINEERING CONTACT: 1" = 800' (0 1 AMY PLUMMER PROJ. NO. 2003-12-06 SNOISIA3B bIONIA Lo-90-9 .LVId GEGNEMV NOISIA3& SNIA AanS ONÂ¥ 00Â¥80100 'MEIVd S31S LO Le-999 (0Â£6) :XY;I * 99Â£6-999 (OL ~*,44 f4 ' 16 '; 41 , N06'55'03"E S06'56'20"W 62.1 4111111!1 75.00' . OLLHOd V 103rOhld '#11 , - Park Lane Subdivision Can amended plat of the Town of Estes Park Subdivision) 1- Estes Park Community Development Department -'--~~'-- Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~Ii=*d PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: June 19,2007 REOUEST: Combine several lots of record into a single lot. LOCATION: The site is located at 134 W. a - A y? Elkhorn Avenue, within unincorporated ~ ~A.. 1213 &Fl,-----7 f tv USES f Larimer County/the Town of Estes Park OWNERS: Zach Wheatley and Richard A. 9- 38 36 Wood M'/4/in ..... 7 I USFS ~hatioral 1~rk U.5 APPLICANT: Zach Wheatley (WAG - Corporation) c LISFS RMP N Ekx..,ly STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying (Mike Todd), 586-2458 Parcel Number: 3525114-008, -009 Development Area: .366 acres Number of Lots: Six existing, one proposed Existing Land Use: Commercial Proposed Land Use: Mixed commercial, Existing Zoning: "CD" Commercial office, and residential Downtown Adj acent Zoning- East: "CD" Commercial Downtown North: "CD" Commercial Downtown West: "CD" Commercial Downtown South: "CD" Commercial Downtown Adjacent Land Uses- East: Commercial retail North: Residential West: Commercial retail South: Public park Services- Water: Town Sewer: EPSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer , I PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to combine several lots into a single lot. The purpose of the amended plat is to facilitate redevelopment of the property for a mixed-use commercial, office, and residential development. See Development Plan 07-08 "Park Lane." REVIEW CRITERIA: This proposal complies with applicable sections of the EVDC. All relevant sections apply to the development plan. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision ofpublic services. A utility easement should be platted for the proposed location of the electric transformers. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. This proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 3. Within sixty (60) days of the Board's approval of the amended plat, the developer shall submit the final plat for recording. If the amended plat is not submitted for recording within this sixty-day time period, the approval shall automatically lapse and be null and void. 4. This is a Planning Commission recommendation the Town Board; Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Amended Plat of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, and a portion of Lot 8, Block 1 Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park CONDITIONAL TO platting of a utility easement for the proposed electric transformers. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed amended plat to the Town Board of Trustees with the findings and condition recommended by staff. DENLÂ·lL: I move to recommend DISAPPROVAL of the proposed amended plat to the Town Board of Trustees because. . . (state reason for denial - findings). Page #2 - Park Lane Amended Plat , Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 04-12-07 Re: Park Lane Development, 205 Park Lane The Light and Power Department has reviewed the application for an Amended Plat for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 2.) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 3.) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 4.) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 5.) The submitted plan needs to show all proposed and existing utilities, type, and location. 6.) Easements need to accompany new lot lines in new proposed locations. 7.) Easements also need to accompany all existing primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 8.) The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 9.) We need load calculations and voltage requirements for transformer sizing purposes. 10.) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 11.) All existing easements pertaining to Power must remain intact. 12.) All primary electric must be buried 4' deep in a 4" conduit. 1 r Â£ ( Page 1 061 Dave Shirk From: Greg Sievers Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 5:12 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: park lane building The Public Works Department has no concerns with combining the lots as proposed in the Amended Plat. however, there will be a thorough review when the final development plan is submitted, as there are many aspects we will comment on for this complex property. Greg Sievers Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering P.O. Box 1200 (mail) 170 MacGregor Avenue (shipping) Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586 0 970-586-6909 f 970-227-0437 c gsievers@estes.org http://www.estesnet.com/publicworks/Engineering/default.aspx 4/12/2007 ( GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 ,oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 April 20,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Amended Plat - Park Lane Development Dear Mr. Shirk: I have no comment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. VEry'Kruly Youa / 1/4 L_14 / Gregory\gÂ· White GAW/ldr CC: Cornerstone Eno#leering, Jes etz Fax: 970/586-2459 te grtijal m Estes Park Sanitation District PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 8051 7 April 13,2007 Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517-1200 RE: Park Lane Development Dear Dave Shirk, Upon review of the proposed Amended Plat for the above mentioned properly the Dis- trict has the following comments: 1, The District has no problem with the proposed amended plat. 2, Service lines to the redeveloped properly will need to be upgraded. The District recommends the developer speak with EPSD staff to review the requirements for sewer service. Thank you for the opportunily to comment on this review, Sincerely, James Duell District Manager : f a . 3 , 'r. . -Â·,~-, '102; T: r, 1. rÂ·%~ -t, 3 hi .11 15; t.ir #.rg 3 Â©' '. :ni ' 1 ----* 1 r i :9 11 Gg 17. . )4 if L li 'Â·1 4 Â·Jet J -" Â· j Â·i # Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 I C C Dave Shirk om: Lisa Thieme [Ithieme@larimer.org] ilt: Wednesday, April 11,2007 3:38 PM 10: Dave Shirk CC: jreetz@ces-ccc.com Subject: comment on Park Lane Subdivision preliminary plat Dave and Jes-- For the Park Lane Subdivision plat, please add the middle initial "A" to the signature line for Richard Wood. He owns the underlying property as Richard A Wood. Thanks! Lisa Thieme Assessment Technician Office of the Assessor 970-498-7097 1 , 03 ' ' CORNE?STONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & 2 tÂ» 1 SURVEYING, INC, f . ir 1 1, Â·Â·-v -Â· '.. CE' #3 rvr:Â·] e.--:. t B:, 5 ~ i .iM . 47 66 u ... March 21, 2007 1Â·(,Â·JE - â€¢t-,-rr~, =- .*-&1/'- 1 i $ i,'1 Ft NAR 210 m . Jii f~:- 114 Mr. Bob Joseph 0 - i! Community Development Director j Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter o f Intent for the "Park Lane Subdivision" Parcels Number 35251-14-008 & 35251-14-009. Dear Bob, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of our client Zach Wheatley are pleased to submit the Preliminary Plat for "Park Lane Subdivision". Owners/Lien Holders The current owners of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and a portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat ofTown of Estes Park are Zach Wheatley and Richard Wood. First National Bank of Estes Park is the lienholder. Adjacent Zoning Current zoning of the subject property is "CD" Commercial Downtown. Surrounding properties are also zoned CD-Commercial Downtown Proiect Description The project involves eliminating the dividing lines between the current Lots 9,10,11,12 and a portion of Lot 8. Currently two buildings lie on Lots 8,9 & 10 with an additional building on Lots 10 & 11. This plan will combine the lots and not create any additional lots or building sites. Access The subject property is bordered by Park Lane to the South and Virginia Drive to the West. A 20 foot wide alley is bordered on the North. Phasing The client plans to proceed with the development of the subject property with plans to be submitted for review to the Town of Estes Park. Once approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission is obtained construction will be beginning as soon as October 2007. 0 0, ilities ility services are provided as follows: Water Town of Estes Park Electric Town of Estes Park Gas Excel Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Any elimination of or alteration to existing utility easements will be completed during the development phase. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerelyy7 Got. 0 Jâ‚¬U*CL Senior Draftsman f f ,Â¥ r.Â·Â·='Â·9 Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· 'Â· ' , ESTES VALLEY 2.:' .' t DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION.l I 1 MAR 2 1 $07 :J, !1 V , 11 1 11 , Â·Submittal Date: Mar 6 L 21' 200 7 . .4/ . i Type of Application r Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map r Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation F Preliminary Map r Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change r Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify 17 Minor Subdivision Plat R Amended Plat General Information Project Name Par k And A.Ve,/SpnÂ·12/1 tr Project Description Combine> Airce.15 36-267 -/1-008 *009 Project Address 605 Pa k An. Legal Description Â£05 9,9, /O, ( 1+12 8100< 1-, 62:dond, Amended Picer of ~1421 '944rk Parcel ID # 3545/-/4-08+ 009 Section 25- Township 57V Range 731Â« Site Information Total Development Area (acres) O.-366 Existing Land Use ReÂ«i \ 3 Resfaa,ra.M K Proposed Land Use #A Existing Water Service G Town r Well r Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service W Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service X EPSD r UTSD F Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service DZ EPSD r UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes 1% No Existing Gas Service R Xcel F- Other F None Existing Zoning C O Proposed Zoning NA Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? F Yes IR No Has site staking been completed? E Yes F No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person rrea Ree-1-z_ Mailing Address /6942 8,19 7-kon:Obolt Ave. , Sait= 200, Al@5 jai k, CO 86:Erl Attachments ~ Application fee AT Statement of intent Of 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan ~ 11" X 17"reduced copy of plat or plan K Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park a P.O. Box 1200 + 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev 1(( b ... Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant R ConsultanVEngineer Record Owner cs, ZBL A WABA+ lÂ« Mailing Address PO BOX 1335, E5*5 Park, Â£20 805-(7 Phone Cell phone 3/0- 9975 Fax Email Applicant Zculk, v kgoj-le-y Mailing Address Ft> gok /335-2 225*6 Ar k, CO S 05-1 7 Phone Cell Phone 070) 31 0 -90175 Fax Email Consultant/Engineer 60'her:g.ft),70' En Bineer/,14 4- Z#Â«ri,pÂ·,1,;fl, 3Gkl. Mailing Address /692 80 7-40 '*3~,/t )142., 546-ft-2-CO Phone .5-86- 62458 Cell Phone i . Fax 596 -2 959 , t ! MAR 21 2007 Email j/Bele @ 66,5-04Â£* 4-0011â€ž i :1% 1 1 APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINTÂ· ZAâ‚¬. k 1,/42Â£0/ey Applicant PLEASE PRINT: 28-ok \A/keas'ty Signatures: Record Owner Date Aol Date 314,7 /1 * U APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge ~ and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). * I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) I I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. ~ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. 4 I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: 2- kok, WAeÂ»j-Ity Applicant PLEASE PRINT: ~a & k Whecvt- k v Signatures: l Record Owner Date 3 -47 Applicant< Date 4647 , U - IFi-4 6:0 ip:/ r'Â¢'77 7 P j" Ir-T~ 47/2 11,e; i.%1 4:07 1= d if . . 4 1 W :L. 11 NAR 21 %07 M f ./ i '. jit Revised 10/13/06 0.- f 0 . 0 Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant F Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) 212#ard (4'606- Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Za-ck 4/heart /2-V Mailing Address /~2 Bok /335--. &35Â¥aa Ark LO 803-77 Phone Cell Phone 310 -9975- Fax Email Consultant/Engineer CornerK-tong, En~inper,~ and :5(AA//0.,V,~p I>, c. Mailing Address /6 92 83 7*ompso4 Ave.. 4.ife =00 phone 586-246)3 Cell Phone Fax 586.- 2439 Email 3(ke>tz â‚¬ 422.5 Â·Â· 6,c<>. c.-041. APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWSchedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: REL.rd- G/6oct- Applicant PLEARINT: tures: A Record Owner Date 03l.1 107 a /7 I J Applicant k Date C . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION * I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge ~ and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. ./- * In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). 4 l acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWDevCode.) 4 I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. 4 I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: picia.Â« 640 2--- Applicant PLEASE-Palb'IL- Signatures: ~- Licxji Record O~ner Date 0, 1 17 / 07 1 ID Applica Date Revised 10/13/06 C C- h NANNANNANNANAN 10 10 OO 00 00 B 0000000000000000 NOOUOUOUQUOUQUOUOU 6 0.â‚¬ 2 2 Â£ 22 2 2 Â£ 2 2 2 Â¢0 -Â¤ m (0 (5 Co co co co co (0 Co H 06%0-0-0-0-0-0.0.0.0-0-0- 0 000000 0 .00 53 222222 ---_g 0 0 0 0 0 Of. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J U.1 LU U.1 111 LU LU LU LU LU LU LU C 3 0 030 0 2 (D 4.008002 ccâ€¢)09810<owi~ D. Eg@.29 $ 36;g.m e U ~~a cr Zgxextobxx .p 1~ x x v c,me Â£2 512 tr)00 IM dj> 8,2 26 FoooÂ©!084002.00 0 8 9- 0- O- O- NO- - - O- Q. CU O- O.O.00 5 6 G (D >. 1 m g g. u R m ~ J E .g k, 06 1 Â¥" ~ Z m r co O Â®13$3 0-#6%-i:1586~~ .m * 06 (D .m 2 - O 0 - I J O CD.- CD (0 o drif W@z *% ~E tr* A ~COC N ~ O&3 O > .L Z 2202,22 r #02 52*22 04 Elkhorn, LLC Mountain Avenue 80538 8051 8051 Rayann Barrett Glover 8051 8051 8051 8051 8051 aldemar O. & Sandra L. Paul 8051 PO Box 228 8051 Estes Park, 8051 Ann Shirley Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 Robert E. Wagner nger Drive Estes Park, 8051 leld pepuel.Uv euel >peel Owner Owner 11 Address Dermody Bank of Estes Park Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, 80517 , p-.-~ Park Lane Development (DP 07-08) ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: June 19, 2007 REOUEST: Redevelop property with four i -tio cxnr----- ~: USFS residential/accommodation units, two restaurant >N J / .-- E--- ly-1 ' areas, office, and retail space. W -I USFS LOCATION: 205 Park Lane, within the Town N~tional Fark ( u'l h'.1 A--7 1 of Estes Park. . APPLICANT: WAG Corporation (Zach uL A = n ..7 Usfs FAill Wheatley, President) U~| ~DC BDinday f PROPERTY OWNERS: Zach Wheatley, Richard Wood STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) SITE DATA TABLE: Consultant Team: Cornerstone Engineering (586-2458), Mike Todd or Jes Reetz; and, BASIS Architecture (586-9140), Steve Lane Parcel Number(s): 3525114-008, and -009 Development Area: .366 acres Number of Lots: Five existing, one proposed Existing Land Use: Retail (see Park Lane Subdivision file) Proposed Land Use: Mixed retail, office, Existing Zoning: "CD" Commercial restaurant, and residential Downtown Adj acent Zoning- East: "CD" Commercial Downtown North: "CD" Commercial Downtown West: "CD" Commercial Downtown South: "CD" Commercial Downtown Adjacent Land Uses- East: Retail North: Residential West: Retail South: Bond Park Services- Water: Town Sewer: EPSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to redevelop a piece of downtown property, and includes removing all existing buildings, development of a four-level commercial/residential building that will "stair-step" up the hill side, and reconstruction of a sidewalk and retaining wall structure along Virginia Drive. The applicant intends to provide retail, office, restaurant, and residential space, with eight parking spaces intended to serve the residential use. This proposal complies with all applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code, with the exception of sidewalk width in three specific areas, (outlined below). REVIEW CRITERIA: This development plan is subject to applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Zoning Requirements. Land Use. The proposed land uses are allowed in the "CD" district. Densily. The "CD" district does not restrict the number of second floor dwelling units. Impervious Coverage. The "CD" district does not have a maximum impervious coverage limit. Floor Area Ratio. The "CD" district has a floor area ratio of 2.0; the proposed 1.38 FAR complies with this requirement. Pedestrian Amenities and Linkage Requirements. Table 4-8 requires provision for pedestrian linkages. The proposed sidewalk system meets this requirement. The sidewalk step on Park Lane should be either clearly identified with tactile and visual marking, or redesigned with a ramp. The EVDC establishes an eight-foot sidewalk width in commercial districts. The applicant intends to meet this requirement, with three exceptions: a stairway near the north end of the property has a corner that extends about two-feet into the 8-foot area; the steps to the courtyard area extend about two-feet into the 8 -toot area; and a planter along Park Lane extends about 1.5-feet into the 8-foot area. Section 3.7 of the EVDC allows the planning commission to grant minor modification of up to 25% for general development standards, "provided the EVPC finds that such modification advances the goals and purposes of [the EVDC] and Page #2 - Park Lane Development, Development Plan 07-08 either results in less visual impact or more effective environmental or open space preservation, or relieves practical difficulties in developing a site." Staff recommends the planning commission grant minor modifications to allow these encroachments. Setbacks. The "CD" district requires an eight-foot minimum setback and a sixteen- foot maximum setback from the property line. This means that buildings must be at least eight from the property line (sidewalk width), but no more than sixteen feet. The sixteen-foot maximum setback is to ensure a continuous street wall and eliminate gaps in the "urban fabric." Staff suggests this proposal complies with the sixteen-foot maximum setback, even with the courtyard area that extends further from the Virginia Drive property line than sixteen feet. There are no setback requirements for the east and north property lines. Comprehensive Plan. Section 3.8.D requires development plans be consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. The Estes Valley Plan includes several Community Wide Policies. Specific examples include: 1. Encourage existing and future community commercial uses to locate within a compact, well defined downtown business district. 2. Encourage the concentration of cultural uses and activities in the downtown business district. 3. Provide a pedestrian-friendly downtown environment which provides for pedestrian movement, areas for relaxing, gathering and window shopping. 4. Encourage outdoor public spaces, including spaces for gathering, dining, nature and people watching. 5. Urban land use should occur within the Town limits of Estes Park. 6. Locate and design buildings to fit the land. Avoid excessive cuts and fills by stepping building down sloping sites. Use retaining walls to minimize the cut and fill of slope. 7. Facades should be broken up with windows, doors or other architectural features to provide visual relief. 8. Encourage infill of older core areas in order to reduce infrastructure costs and to stabilize residential neighborhoods. 9. Encourage an adequate blend o f public and private parking for both residents and visitors. 10. Provide for mixed use developments which integrate commercial, housing, employment, and service needs. 11. Encourage housing infill within the existing urban area. 12. Maintain a unique blend ofbusinesses, residents and visitors, without negatively affecting the natural beauty of the Estes Valley. Based on the numerous community wide policies this development addresses, Staff suggests this plan is consistent with the Estes Valley Plan. Page #3 - Park Lane Development, Development Plan 07-08 Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance Standards" applies to this proposal. No grading, excavation or tree/vegetation removal shall be permitted, whether to provide for a building site, for on-site utilities or services or for any roads or driveways, before issuance of a building permit. Per Section 7.2.B6, retaining walls over four feet tall must be engineered. Landscaping and Buffers. Development in the "CD" district is exempt from "impervious coverage" and street frontage landscaping requirements, and this particular development does not "trigger" parking lot or district buffer requirements. Therefore, no landscaping is required. The proposed landscaping exceeds that required by the development code. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downeast. No lighting fixture shall be higher than fifteen feet above ground. This includes parking lot and security lighting. A lighting "cut sheet" will need to be submitted for Staffreview prior to issuance of first building permit. The applicant proposes four additional sidewalk lights along Virginia Drive. These will match those elsewhere downtown. Off-Street Parking and Loading. The "CD" district is exempt from all parking requirements and standards. This proposal includes eight (8) parking spaces, therefore exceeding the amount of parking required. It may be possible to locate the proposed ADA spaces in front of the door to the lobby, where the elevator is located. This would provide the most direct accessible route. Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Electric. All new electric service is to will be underground, and some of the crossing over the alley will be removed. Ample power is available to serve this proposal. Drainage/Water Quality Management. The development plan calls for surface drainage near the southwest corner of the lot, which will flow into a "pooling area" Page #4 - Park Lane Development, Development Plan 07-08 prior to emptying into a sidewalk chase and eventually into Park Lane. This area needs redesign to eliminate variations in the sidewalk surface. fl - 1. - : -c - mk~.... 1 '~~ -4 + N Â· O 5-_ - 0 b.â‚¬ e . 1. .042. 75/79?k-/5. , / 5, '4. ' 2:8.2.. g Â· ~:C l. " l L *(yl Lod.rrpi 224,6 7.2,41 : i f . , . ' FIL 5,94 SHAPE CONCRETE -4 k 27 75Â· r. 4 rO FLOW IN70 ' -- . , , SEb- HANDIE,~P Â·C 5Â·. SIDEWALK CHASE' : ~, .~ ~ .4 ' '~~~â€¢Â·DETE#VABL~. ~ \11 .1 > . ~ 1{GON:.RE'it Ovikt . 1 ' Pricm- ro VARY Â·Â· â€¢ -- 2 12' ttAG+ONE ~| O.* 0-- 1-bL. 47 'LE Â· *'4".C ' , PAVEks .(r~P. )Â·Â· I- 0 49 > 004 k, 1-4. f 29 f~r* ~posED-4.- ~ S9TWALL/PLANTERâ€¢ 30 \ -*7 25 / 1 . I. , 28 25 -- Ea *-- -67, i. ' - ~ COLORED/SCOÂ¥~ ~ , Â·> -19@Q~' ~~~~>f' 4, l~_-4~ Â·Â·~18.,o ~ j ~ - --CONCRETE ' ~ I 1, 4 -. Â·Â·,f> 28'7 ~ 2~trE--3.~rb --l - 8. 20 f-- . -a 1-4 -.-END 325 -8 ~ Â«i ri--1 , now HANORAt - //\Â»992 )4' . j X. 4/1 Sanitary Sewer. The development will connect to the existing main located in Park Lane. A "grease trap" interceptor is planned in the Park Lane right-of-way. Public Works has agreed to this design, though a right-of-way permit will be required. Water. The development will connect to the existing water main located in Park Lane. Fire Protection. The submitted ISO calculations indicate adequate fire flow is available with existing hydrants. Operational Performance. This proposal meets operational performance standards regarding screening of mechanical equipment and location of trash dumpster. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Light and Power Department. The Light and Power Department made several comments regarding costs, issuance of permits, as-built plans, easements, and meters. Compliance should be a condition of approval. Water Department. The water department made several comments regarding fixture count, abandonment of existing service lines, sprinkler system, and cross connections. Compliance should be a condition of approval. Page #5 - Park Lane Development, Development Plan 07-08 Public Works. The Public Works Department had a variety of comments that should be included as conditions of approval of the Development Plan. These included drainage, paving, and soils reports. Estes Park Urban Renewal. The final design of the planters and seatwalls to be located within public right-of-way should be approved by EPURA. Building Department. The Building Department provided a Development Plan Review Checklist, with which the applicant should familiarize himself. The Applicant should contact Will Birchfield (577-3728) to discuss other building issues such as demolition, grading, and building permit requirements. Americans with Disabilities Act. Per Building Department comments, this "development has requirements regarding accessibility for physically disabled persons." The development plan includes two handicap accessible parking spaces, which centrally located. These spaces will need to be marked and signed in accordance with Section 7.11.J4. Additionally, the nearby ramp requires "truncated domes" per State and Federal law. It may be possible to locate the proposed ADA spaces in front of the door to the lobby, where the elevator is located. This would provide the most direct accessible route. Conduits. Per Section 7.13, "conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be screened, covered or painted to minimize visual impacts." STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. The applicant should carefully review the Staff report, which contains several references to Code requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could lead to a delay in issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. 2. The applicant requests a minor modification to the required eight-foot sidewalk width in three specific locations, as delineated on the plan. Staff recommends these modifications be granted. 3. With the exception o f the minor modification to sidewalk width, the development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in this Code. 4. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. 5. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 6. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making body for the development plan. Page #6 - Park Lane Development, Development Plan 07-08 Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed "Park Lane" Development Plan 07-08 CONDITIONAL TO: 1. The amended plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of any permits. 2. Compliance with memo from Jeff Boles to Bob Goehring dated 5/22/07. 3. Compliance with memo from Greg Sievers and Scott Zurn to Dave Shirk dated May 30,2007. 4. Compliance with memo from Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated 5-23-07. 5. EPURA shall approve the final design of the planters and seatwalls to be located within public right-of-way. 6. The sidewalk step on Park Lane shall be either clearly identified with tactile and visual marking, or redesigned with a ramp. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move APPROVAL of Development Plan 07-08 "Park Lane Development" with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENLiL: I move DISAPPROVAL of Development Plan 07-08 because... (state reason for denial -findings). CONTINUANCE: 1 move to continue Development Plan 07-08 because ... (state reason for continuance -findings). Page #7 - Park Lane Development, Development Plan 07-08 7~ Town of Estes Park 1 Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, qsievers@estes.orq Memo To: Dave Shirk, Planner From: Greg Sievers & Scott Zurn Date: May 30,2007 Re: 205 Park Lane, Lots 9 - 12, Second Amended Plat, Town of Estes Park After reviewing the Deveopment Plan 07-08 the Public Works Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Review and approval by EPURA shall be included in this process. 2. Provide drainage report. (Identify all roof drains. Include upstream volumes & downstream track to river). 3. Only 2 trench grates shall cross the Park Lane sidewalk, and none on Virginia Drive. Surface drainage shall not be transmitted down the H/C ramp onto Park Lane. 4. Mid level parking & roof drains shall connect to existing culvert in alley. Replace existing culvert for length of alley frontage. Install manhole/catch basin at pipe intersection. 5. Repave 70' of alley full width including connection to Virginia Drive to accommodate new storm improvements & traffic use. Intersection of Alley & Virginia drive shall have a concrete cross-pan that accommodates uphill flow volume. 6. Engineered soils reports shall be provided and approved prior to construction. Detailed soils reports shall be provided during all fill placements. (ie: under parking area & walls) 7. Engineered wall design, details & specifications (including backfill) shall be provided for all retaining walls. 8. All asphalt replacement shall be 4" thick, and placed over 4" of ABC, including all replacement areas. 9. Project shall acquire a Right-of-way permit. All utility connections shall be backfilled with flow-fill' and patched per Town of Estes Park Guidelines. 10. Provide recorded drainage maintenance agreement. (include snow removal) 11. Provide recorded shared driveway maintenance agreement. (include snow removal) 12. Asphalt & curb removal on Park Lane shall be full length of parking stalls (approx. 160LF). Provide X-sections of Virginia Drive every 20LF. Curb line may need to be elevated to reduce cross section slope. 13. All restriping (3M tape), symbols (perform) & signs shall be approved by PW prior to installation. 14. Cost estimate shall separate paving quantities to include replaced, patching, & new. 15. H/C ramps shall include 24" concrete tile 'bump' style and be approved by PW. Project shall also replace adjacent ramp at Virginia crossing. 16. Typical perimeter easements are 10' wide. (?) 17. Provide & install 3 sidewalk mounted trash cans (match Town style) w/ collection service by WAG or HOA. ' 18. Final 'seatwall' locations shall be approved by PW. Walkways width of 6' shall be a minimum clearance. â€¢ Page 2 Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 5/22/2007 Re: Park Lane Development Lots 9,10,11,12 & a Portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park 205 Park Lane After review of the Development Plan 07-08 the Water Department has the following comments: 1) Applicant must schedule a Water Fixture/Dwelling Unit Count with a representative of the Water Department prior to demolition and/or construction to ensure any applicable credit toward additional water fees. Contact the department at 970-577-3622 for scheduling. Any demolition done prior to the fixture count will result in forfeiture of any applicable water tap credits. 2) Existing water service lines must be abandoned at the water main. A Service Line Permit from the Building Department will be required for this abandonment. 3) If the structure is required to have a Fire Suppression System a 'Fire Sprinkler System Connection Application' must be completed and submitted to the Water Department before any connection is granted. This application must include a detailed drawing noting: â€¢ Location, sizing and type of backflow prevention device(s) â€¢ Engineered flow requirements for the fire sprinkler system â€¢ Spill control method for proper disposal of discharge from the relief valve, indicating location and sizing of drainage capable of accommodating the discharge that could occur Due to fire line size both a chlorination and pressure test will be required, conducted by a representative of the Water Department prior to acceptance. 4) Cross Connection Requirements: â€¢ All service lines are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for containment purposes. The device type will be dependant upon the hazard associated with the service (high hazard or low hazard). The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Technician upon installation and annually there after. Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum â€¢ All irrigation systems are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for isolation purposes. The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Technician upon installation and annually there after. Contact the Cross-Connection Control Specialist at 970-577-3625 for requirements relating to the property. MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: May 29,2007 Subject: Park Lane Development Lots 9, 10, 11,12 @ a Portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat Of Town of Estes Park 205 Park Lane The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the Development Plan for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. Please see attached Development Plan Review Checklist. Review Date: 5/29/2007 Review By: Will Birchfield DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 205 Park Lane- Park Lane Development Address U Official addresses shall be assigned by the Department of Building Safety. U Condominiums must submit (to the Department of Building Safety) any address changes before the preliminary condominium map is approved. Process fees will be assessed unless the address change is included with the original building permit application. U All construction documents shall be prepared by Colorado Design Professionals and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U A detailed Code Analysis by a Colorado Design Professional is required. U A detailed site plan is required and shall include utility locations, setbacks, contours, drainage, landscaping, access, easements, etc. E A grading and drainage plan shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. U Grading plans and permits are required prior to and are separate from building permits. A grading permit is required prior to any grading or excavation (Estes Park Municipal Code Â§14.12.030) U The limits of site disturbance shall be maintained and are restricted to within the property lines and/or to areas specified on the approved plans. U State and Town Demo Permits are required prior to demolition of structures. U Prior to any excavation and/or construction activity, a detailed drainage/erosion plan to protect neighboring properties, public right-of-ways, floodplains and drainage areas during the construction phase shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Filtration of storm water is required prior to release from the site. Failure to comply with said approved plans may result in an immediate stop work order on the entire development. The final site drainage plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department. U The foundation systems, including mitigation of potential water problems shall be designed by a Colorado Design Professional and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. El Foundation setback and elevation certificates shall be provided by a Colorado design Professional, and shall bear the appropriate wet stamps. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review- 205 Park Lane.doc Revised 10/17/2006- CB El A construction traffic plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works and Police Departments prior to obstructing or interfering with any vehicular traffic on public right-of-ways. C-Dot shall approve all construction activity on State Highways (Hwy 34, 36 and 7). El A pedestrian protection plan is required and shall be approved by the Building Department prior to any construction activity. U The developer shall specify the intended uses of the dwelling units. Are they intended to be private dwelling (owner occupied), long term rentals (apartments), or short term rentals (nightly accommodations)? 0 One hour fire-resistance-rated construction is required between all dwelling units. Il All new construction shall comply with all applicable accessibility laws. It is the designers' and developers' responsibilities to comply with laws that Town staff does not have the authority to interpret nor the responsibility to enforce, such as ADA, Federal and State Fair Housing Acts, etc. Additionally, the designer shall specifically detail how the proposed development shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the 2003 IBC, Chapter 11. Detailed accessibility specs are required. U Compliance with the accessibility requirements of CRS 9-5 is required, and includes an implementation plan prior to issuance of any building permits. U All appendages, such as decks and roofs must be shown on the plans, including building footprint details and construction details. U Building permits are required prior to any construction and/or remodeling. U A Building permit is required for temporary construction office trailers. El Temporary construction sign permits and permanent business sign permits are required and are separate from building permits. El All requirements of the approved development plan shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. El All requirements of approved variances shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. U All requirements of Planning Commission conditions of approval shall be conditions of any and all permits related to this development, now and in the future. El A pre-construction meeting with Town staff and construction contractors is required prior to issuance of building permits. U An approved NFPA 13 compliant Automatic Sprinkler System may be required. (1 An approved NFPA 72 Fire Alarm System may be required. \\Servera\comm_dev\Building\REVIEWS\Dev Plan Reviews\Development Plan Review- 205 Park Lane.doc Revised 9/19/2006- CB GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 May 22,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-08 - Park Lane Development Dear Mr. Shirk: I have no comment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Vetv Truly Yours, / r Gre~ry A. White GAW/ldr f. A cc: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes ~~0 Fax: 970/586-2459 Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 05-23-07 Re: Park Lane Development, 205 Park Lane The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for a Development Plan #07-08 for the above referenced propetty and has the following comments: 1) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4) The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5) Easements need to accompany new lot lines in new proposed locations. 6) Easements also need to accompany all existing primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 7)The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 8) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 9) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 10)All easements pertaining to Power must remain intact. 11)All primary electric must be buried 4' deep in a 4" conduit 12) No comments 1 A.rk - r=- , 11 N ri--ct 1-1-~~~lititifiri Ll j t 1 1 A ~ MAY 2 5 2007 ~ ~, ~ Estes Park Sanitation District D UL___2 10 PO Box 722, Estes Park, CO 8051 7 May 25,2007 Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517-1200 RE: Park Lane Development Dear Dave Shirk, Upon review of the proposed Amended Plat for the above mentioned properly the Dis- trict has the following comments: 1. The scope of the development plan and possible impacts will require a review by our board of directors. The next board meeting will be June 12#1 2007, I will have comments to you the following day. Thank you, Sincerely, James Duell District Manager Office: 1201 Graves Avenue 970.586.2866 / Plant: 610 Big Thompson Ave 970.586.3516 Fax: 970.586.4712 0 C 1 CORNEASTONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 ENGINEFfING & f~9 SURVEYING, INC May 30,2007 19*SOVE'Kil Mr. Bob Joseph Community Development Director ~~ JUN - 1 200 ~ Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 .0- :. ........4-1 Estes Park, CO 80517 LI.rnrÂ· t". ffee-WJ RE: Letter of Intent for the "Park Lane Developmenf' Parcels Number 35251-14-008 & 35251-14-009. Dear Bob, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behal f of our client Zach Wheatley are pleased to submit the Development plan for "Park Lane Development". Owners/Lien Holders : current owners of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and a portion of Lot 8, Block 1, Second Amended Plat ofTown of es Park are Zach Wheatley and Richard Wood. First National Bank of Estes Park is the lien holder. An application is currently in process to combine these lots and create Lot 1, Park Lane Subdivision. Upon time of the plat approval, Mr. Wheatley will own Lot 1 with Centennial Lending being the lien holder. Adiacent Zoning Current zoning of the subject property is "CD" Commercial Downtown. Surrounding properties are also zoned CD-Commercial Downtown Project Description Currently the lot is occupied with buildings of mixed use Retail and a Restaurant. This plan will remove the existing building to construct a 21,975 SF mixed use building. The building will have four levels with access to the First floor off of Park Lane; access to the Second floor is through a proposed courtyard off of Virginia Drive. Access to the Third floor and proposed parking is off the existing alley that borders the north property line. Drainage from the proposed parking area will be minimal due to being covered but any drainage that does occur will flow to the alley due to the fact that the finished floor ofthe building is 4-feet higher than the existing alley way. The existing sidewalk along Park Lane will be replaced with concrete curb and gutter with a sidewalk attached. Area inlets will be used in the Second floor courtyard which will discharge onto the surface and flow into a sidewalk chase onto Virginia Drive. The existing 5-foot sidewalk along Virginia Drive will be removed and replaced with and 8-foot wide concrete sidewalk and will be extended northerly to end with an accessible ramp into the alley. A trash enclosure is proposed in the northeast corner of the project. This enclosure will be screened and be in accordance with EVDC 7.5.F.2.c. king CES realizes parking is an issue in downtown Estes Park. Our client has taken measures to help this situation without compromising the integrity of the project. Along with the expansion along Park Lane, eight covered parking spaces will be available for the upper floor residential units. C . 4 Access The subject property is bordered by Park Lane to the South and Virginia Drive to the West. A 20 foot wide alley is bordered on the North. Phasing Once approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission is obtained construction will be beginning as soon as October 2007 and finish by Memorial Day of 2008. Estimated Cost The estimated cost of this project is $3.1 million. Utilities Utility services are provided as follows: Water Town of Estes Park Service will be provided from an existing 6" water main located in Park Lane. The service is currently shown as 4", final size to be determined at the building permit phase. Water will have one (1) meter. Electric Town of Estes Park Service to the proposed building will be from a proposed 3-phase transformer located in the northwest corner of the project. Currently a power pole and Junction box border the west property line along Virginia Drive. This plan will remove the existing power pole. A proposed 1-phase transformer willlocated adjacent to our proposed 3-phase transformer with new service to the Virginia Court Condominiums. Electric will have three (3) meters (1-Retail, 1-Restaurant, 1-Residential). Gas Excel Service will be provided from an existing gas line in the alley. Gas will have three (3) meters (1-Retail, 1- Restaurant, 1-Residential). Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District An existing sewer main is located in Park Lane, location and condition of the existing sewer main is unknown. A 6" sewer service is proposed along with a grease/oil interceptor that will be shared between two units. The grease/oil interceptor size is to be determined at the building permit phase. ISO Calculations ISO calculations have been performed and submitted to the town for review. This proposed building meets the required Fire Flow. Variance Request A variance is requested that we be allowed less than an 8-foot sidewalk to allow for landscaping islands and planters, the entry to the courtyard and the entry to the office. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, / Jes Reetz Senior Draftsman ESTES VALLEY /.. I 1 Â· 22~ .: 4.32 1170 d 4 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLIC~rION.' .f~ 7/ j ~ m Submittal Date: 4/25/2007 Type of Application . ,....----i.-I'-P-44-6 12 Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map F Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation 1- Preliminary Map E Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change r Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat F Amended Plat General Information Project Name Park Lane Development Project Description Development of land, Commercial, Residential Project Address 205 Park Lane Legal Description Lots 8,9,10,11 & 12, Block 1, Second Amended Plat of Town of Estes Park Parcel ID # 35251-14-008 & 009 Section 25 Township 5N Range 73W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 0.366 Existing Land Use Retail, Restaurant Proposed Land Use Retail, Restaurant, Office, Residential Existing Water Service P Town r Well r Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 12 Town r Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service 17 EPSD E UTSD r septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service P EPSD r uTSD F Septic Is a sewer lift station required? 0 Yes 12 No Existing Gas Service 17 Xcel F Other F None Existing Zoning CD-Commercial Downtown Proposed Zoning CD-Commercial Downtown Site Access (if not on public street) Park Lane & Virginia Drive Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes 12 No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? r- Yes F No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Jes Reetz Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park a P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue a Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev rl TI ~Irl il 0 - ... Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant P Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) Zach Wheatley Mailing Address PO Box 1335, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone Cell Phone (970) 310-9975 Fax Email Applicant Zach Wheatley , PrasUe,t + , WA 6 Grpor 0*t,O/U Mailing Address PO Box 1335, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone Cell Phone (970) 310-9975 Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Ave., Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone (970) 586-2458 Cell Phone Fax (970) 586-2459 Email ireetz@ces-ccc.corn ~ APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. *. . _... ....... - i Â·-rÂ·- ./- 1.-4 .:1.. 1 T f LA .1 -*â€¢ 7 e.of.* Tgoi I i '1 J I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. , 1 14 1 ?Fl Names: ' 4 APR 2 5 2007 Record Owner PLEASE PRINT.Â· Zach Wheatley 9I r Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Zach Wheatley f $*%.t=,y.Cole:VÂ·#..2~-Ar 1=. Signatures: Record Owner 1402' '-OEÂ¥251'91~2....,0' \ Date Â¥Â»7.07 ~ <314,13,2 .11 1 , /~pplicant /-0~ -Pf*Et<:~ CeigÂ»' \1~ Date M (,7 (07 U U C C APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). 4 l acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) * l understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. 4 I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Zach Wheatley Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Zach Wheatley Signatures: Record Owner J&,f(15 Date 4 (11 87 eLÂ£/ 1 Applicary'~ Date 7 /(7 lo-7 FC< 2 0 If/Â»e~ I ' Â·'7* - ' ' I.: ... lilli 4.91 AM 25 = il 1, 4 4 - Revised 10/13/06 . 1 f f C NANNANNANANNAN tO LO OO S 000000000000000 NOUOUOUOUQUOUOUQU E O 6660 36 3 0 * % 9 2 g e e 25 <' Â© â„¢ a 3 & 2.2 g & RI N N .g CO -Â¤ 9- - .b N =r M 2Â£25[zinmaja:52226 x x P *Â£2**exxxÂ·Â¤ p 1- 0 0 0 5! 0 % Nu o 0 5 0 0 0 8 C - O- 0- O- N O- - - O- O- N O- O- O- 00 0- CD CL 2 5 J 0 om Â®-2 E C C *â‚¬ 2 m. ,- P St Â§}3 5 1- 2 -4 -ag R 06 >' ~ -- 2 Acal B...Zaor (vo MCENCOP ~C~affle 263 10@%1<edÂ®EE~ME (D ~@29 1 *E 22222%E A~U)CNEO 22 8 it: 2 @ r,- 30 j, 2 2 Â·5~,1 C) M '- Mi 1 0 -C -: horn, LLC 69 Rocky Mountain Avenue Loveland, C 80538 Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 ountain Drive Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 - Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8051 Robert E. Wagne r ger Drive Estes Park, 8051 Town of Estes Park o Box to Estes Park, 80517 Box 1084 tes Park, 8051 of Estes Park tes Park, 8051 Estes Park, 8 Estes Park, 8 80-ZO da euel MAI Owner Owner 11 73W- --42;-r- 1 Â« SITE STATISTICS: -.... 26 -I.... PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT hsE:43*Â¥MkF[ " 1 S~ S'AULEY KNOU GROSS/NET LAND AREA - 15,934 SF 0.366 ACRES -Il'ill--*.----I- 11\44 / \ ~wr-11,~~' \ LOT 1, PARK LANE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, - ~Rf.lkliA r,0 9.- /1 11 .0 .2 ...... 1 .... .--a ..........--- ....-a- .......- ... \ ~2>1 /7.1 'T V 01 2 0, 7 . le 2 f MAP 'Â¢;AKB41 VIL SC -- - i.,4 20' AU ' 2old AMD TOWN OF I VIRG Â»CD" LE Gi 00 2 24, WAPSWÂ·;94, - 31'1*EFLAN -;*r.74-9-sm flk/7 &@..0:iMma lili 'Â· Â· Â·Â·Â· Â· - PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ~~~ ,,,,,,, , ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 5) ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AN APPROVED BACKFLOW 8) FINAL 'SEATWALL' LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY PUBUC WORKS. DESIGNED BY 8~-- APPROVED BY .25ML JOB NO. RWFFT SHEET PREVEMON DEVISE INSTALLED FOR ISOLATION PUPOSES. THE DEVICE WIU DRAWN DY ....!IL_ DATE MAY 2007 13 CUENT: WAG CORPORATION 1*~36*.7'Nf 'a - "e- BE TESTED BY A CERTIFIED CROSS-CONNECTION TECHNICIAN UPON 9)'STREET MOUNTED TRASH CANS' TO HAVE COLLECTION SERVICE APPROVED BY 205.036 INSTALLATION AND ANNUALLY THERE AFTER. PUBUC WORKS. CHECKED BY KUP SCALE AS SHOWN 1 1-Â¥W Fll,/. -- .1.&.:/Atel -*M24'el ....1 - I - 9 . A. . A ....... FRI ./Ililligillul .- . . 2. 1. 0 0 0 0 1 2 I . . 0 r-ilme, 94 ..::.n 71"Lik:& r 3 . 1.0 1 . - D A . ... 0 . 0. I 0 - 0 r ..131*i ...4,~ . I .. . . I ). I . 0 . D I 1* . 1 2 1.0 :- p - . . ~ M' e U -- ./ 0. .. I -0.- I If . I. a . 0 . I .0 1. ... U ./ . 1. g.,. i .D ... D .a... ,... .1 0.- . 1....\41 1 0 - D. . A Le ... . 0 0.- 4~, \ . kâ€¢te i~kile,3 ... 0%\ , - ........... ..... ..... . 9 il *P 494:02- Â£4/ .:*&6"/1/I.M.5//3/Af ........... -*... 'D . - 0. .. 0 - .. . 1 1 .111 /./. 2'.r . ...: 4: 4 2-1. -- 1,"'a:,Mifi'Mit>b./. ... . . 01 . I . D . I ... . I. 4~ -P.-I .W, ..... D . . ... I .. ~5- e - 0 9--Â·- - L - . 0,4 44 14 .. .. . I " 1 - ' *A'A SP, Ef;~ 91444 ..U,n 0-4, 0. , - . D ... 0 ....... - 0 0 .. ./ I . - ./ I . -31 I . mi g k. I :- 7. 41 1.- 1 '1.1.,6,18 111 , -:..0 Jit"P {41 1 - ?20 4.4 4 A 1, 0- ' - r= 4 -= ~Â¥,41 , 00:1 -0-0.1 F-0.-44-~Pil, 1 1 1 - 0 1 , I VA -4 A ~~~44*~ ~~ ~~ : . . 0 -. .D .... 4 4 ..1 . ':1 1.ke~\Vâ€ž. . D 7.'h -4,44.&--'4 233# 1 , - . .2 . 1 1 1 . D '..ati ,- th~ \ \ %~i/4-*4 4144}3~ 0 - . 7.-,5....60,1 -'.4 I , DI + I ..19* f. 44/.Ill *11 14â„¢ -- - ..art.j . A.A. Ir . V.I.Q.' 4 kE, , ... 0 1- I *14/ZE,33:"0..52:.I.....~71/6 ... 1~- 1 = .VKA~~++, r~P#5$,*,Â»9 . I ./Billi'Zi~qilialillililgillivmilz~ligill 0 -1 D ... ..I-. . . 1 - D r-- 1 ' Â· D , Â·Â· i . . * - : ~;It''*d.KE#'Â·' 4 . wi#,/isHI~~:A . 0 . e . ... = 1 . 1 . 0 1 .9,~41 '. 1%[f -Api.-4.~4 /..' .. : D --Il -'.2>. . 1 . .. O - . 1/ F . t: 2 9 ' A ... I , 4 --I'l .Blitit:villilli:63* e , 0 Â·Aits 1*~ ' ' Imi *A~Li~:.AA-k: ' 2 5-=i 10. , 1 ... , . mb *4# - -4 0=~4 Â¥ - I . - .&:ruflull" 6 *43,7- . â€¢6.Aier I lk: = 0 .. . .. :14 1 - . Fc 74%4:Aqi Flfu~.,4~,4-~~~~~* --~----=--~* Â· 1 1. - . .). I - 1 = I . 10 1 lu-/ 1 --- ---./9*~~L~ . 0 .. V .-- , -I * ~ ~~7-n ~ 69*/ I . e- 1/ .."Isill'imi,Blit/Mlillit:li-0./:19/~~hime:lial:,4:1~lilik . . r:00000.000/00.,di.- (All ~ FRT#"~Ff,EfF:Bi.*1. I . ..9,- ----.C-. I.#46*;+,z,+,0.eavu~M -1 1 - 1, *14///Bil,maa,%~W.//1////#-Ameb -- - - 35/2 -â€¢T~ ~Ree z *' -â€¢pi.<4--1.6- .â‚¬119 f:6,â€¢i,Ii,--LASE"<7/"9"mv ./Mis .. , , 4--,0-IL 2 - 0.- E: --....... . Â·Â·91 2 . . * . ,>4~9/k~/11~~4-/~~~~~~ 7 rk . . . ..... 1 ' 1 1 = . -- D .. 2 4.,- . i f V .0 7 ,./ . .0 - - 0 1 0. 0 - . .. . .2 1 0 'll.Ii-lill-= .. D . . 1 . ... . 1 I -I.I. 1 1 ' . C. . 0. .... .211, - '1 . f-'.~0001: 2.12 D: 0- -. 1 . . . D 1 ' .- I-' 1 .. 0 . I , 1- 1 : 1 : ., 0 "-- D V i . 0 - 1 ...2-01 1.1 - I -1 .- . . .-I.I.1 . I . I I .I. - 00 - 1 0. .0 - . D -: . ... -1 . 0 . ID . . . 1 -I .- I - ... /-0 . . 0 ...... 1 0 - .. . - 0 0 .. .. -1 0 I D = - - D.. . ... I I 1-- . 1 -- : --- i .: e - ..... "/1 - . - . - - i. - 1 0- D '. .... .................. 2 [dz - 0.-- '. = D I. * 0 . - - I 1 1 0 1 0 . . . . . . * . .1 1 - 1- 0 -- - 1 , . I. - 0 - 1 -0 - 6 -0 .... I .0 -- - - . = ... I . . 1 0 1 .... . . A- 1*: 1 -2 Z.11. .1 . . 2 ....... - . 0 .-0-01: . 1 1 - - 1, 0 - . 0 1 -. 0 1-I-.- .... . 1 I. . - - 0 0 , 0.- I. = -1 . .. .. . 1 - 4 ... ID I. - ...- -. e â€¢ D. O 0 -- .- 1 - 0 - . - 1- D - I -. 1 D- . --- . .- - I - 1 - 0 . I : D D. 0. , : : D.ID - 1 0 ...... 0.0 = 0 e D-0,- , -- -0 = D 2 .... 1-1 .- : D. 0 -,0 '- . -1 I - -*-'I. . .. .. 1 D . . - D 1 -D . 0 -- 2- 0 0 .- 0 : 0. 1 = 71 I - '-- : . I D- -1 : -1.''-' 0 , - 0 . .. . , 1 D . 0 1 .1 . . 2 . , 0 - .. .. A . ... . 0 . 0 - 1 - *. 1.1 . .... . ./. 0 0. ,0 Walt:~ia , 1/JI 4 -1 7- =0 . Z ,- 0 1 2 , 4|41*1~-'= .... D . D ...1 0 - . 1 .... - -O 1 1 -- 0- I . I D . 0 - & 1- . . -. -- 1- r ..0 0 0 1--- , 0-- ... , . 0 1 - - .. .1 . .... 1 , 1 1 , 1 , , PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT LOT 1, PARK LANE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 2-1/2* x 2-1/2" x 1/4" SQUARE BES 0 8' 0~ 1/2, SQUARE PICKETS O 4 1/2" 0.C.-1 2 1/20 x 2 1/2* x 3/16" SQUARE TOP TUBE ~ 1 /2" SQUARE PICKETS 5, 4. 1* O 4 1/2" 0.C. \~ / 2 1/2' x 2 1/2" x 3/16" . / ~ SQUARE TOP TUBE -9 -* \ W. TO MATCH WIDTH NOTE: OF SIDEWALK, BUT l. RAMP AND WING SLOPES SHALL NOT BE NOT LESS THAN 4' STEEPER THAN 12:1. Il.Ii -Ill 4' MAX. 2" x 2" x 1/le 2. NORMAL GUTTER FLOW LINE AND PROFILE SHALL 2" x 0Â» 3 3r 16" 30-6" SQUARE BCTTO W TJBE ~ 34" SQUARE BOTTOM TUBE \ ~ 6.0 BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE RAMP AREA. - 4" MAX. 3. IF POSSIBLE, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL NOT 2 BE PLACED IN UNE WITH RAMPS. LOCATION OF -21/ \1\ RAMP WILL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LOCATION OF RADIUS FLOW UNE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE. ~ 4 \ 4 ALL CURB RAMPS TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNING TRUNCATED DOMES. 49 , PART or PARr OF NOT TO SCALE Â·1-fi: '1Â·0 ,nE" F p .. CURB RAMP DETAIL -:~ â€¢4' .. h tÂ· .:EQUALLY ipt~a Â·,.t 'â€¢. ~ < f , ~ . . 4 . 4 .. 4 i CU,0. wm OF R.0, cue ~ -10 01 .9 OR . 4 1,4 . ...-4.11 ~... ..<91 :Ii<1.*-A .Ir 6-111.~1. .~S ;diE44629i& :~ I. 1. r r . I . .4 Â· 4 . GENERAL NOTES ' . ....1 1. THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SIW.L BE INSTALLED ~111-2.-L-Â£-Â·--~~~7 . ... d; ... .0, ... 4 :. 1 . .. AT SIDEWALK/SrREET TRANS,nONS. THEY SHALL BE .... .. .. Al .1 4 MADE IN PAVER FORM MTH A TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE THE DOMES SHALL 01 PLACED IN A SQUARE GRID. CONCRETE OR MSE RETAINING WALL (TYP.)- HANDRAIL DETAIL / ... .....4...4-...1..... 2. â„¢E TOP Of â„¢E DRAINAGE WEEP HOLE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE LOWEST POINT OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING WELL NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE OR MSE RETAINING WALL (TYP.) -'00' TAPERED END SECTION .. 3. ALL DETECTABLE WARNING AREAS SHALL START A MINIMUM Of 8 INCHES FROM THE FLOW UNE OF THE CURB AND NOT TO SCALE 2,0 .:9:::1:::N ::$:::.4 3, NOT BE MORE â„¢AN A MAXIMUM OF 8 INCHES FROM ANY - 1--T.aft 2192&7110â€¢t - POIE ON THE FLOW UNE OF THE CURB. AU. DEETABLE 0 8' O.C Max.~-Â·\ ....1....1.. .1....1..... WARNING AREAS SHALL BE 24 INCHES IN LENGTH AND -HANDRAIL ON .....1....1 ...1..... / EDGE OF SIDEWALK (TYP.) Wr-60 In ..1....1.. .1....1... . ., COVER THE COUPLETE WIDâ„¢ oF THE RAMP AREA ONLY. BabIDENLQmILS ./9..1....1 ...1.... .* Clle 4. THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA SHALL BE INCLUDED r.,0 . 4 ...1 .4 1. r FLON uf IN THE COST OF THE CONCRETE CURB RAMP. 9-4 4 1 * put pad 1. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE GROUTED INTO HOLES al FLOW LNE . . 11 ' 4. 5. RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 12:1. â„¢E DRILLED INTO EXISTING CONCRErE. POST MAY BE SET IN (SEE NOIE - L DEETABLE IV-G ILL BE STEEPER THAN 201 DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL AREA SLOPES SHALL NOT ~(4) 8'*5/8" EPOXY ANCHOR , - POCKET AND GROUTED. A- I epoxy grouted Into concrete 2. ALL WELDS TO BE 3/160 FILLET OF SQUARE BUTT DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL SWL BE 50* TO 00% OF THE BASE DWEIEN * 4 4 PLAN VIEW OF INE TOP DWIEIER OF TlE mUNOJED Dole ~-ft't~ (mt,1.) *307 botts -l.: d~t--~tr~~ h.x nut. and lock 4 -1 E n ALL AROUND. 1.-14.-1 17 - wash,re. Project bolt, 210 Â¥ N ~ - SIDEWALK above concret, surface. 7--tt I Continuous 1 - 3. SPACING OF VERTICAL METAL HAND RAIUNG POSTS (PAVERS NOT DRAÂ¥*4 TO SCALE) | | | SHALL BE DETERMINED BY MEASUREMENTS. OVERALL r 24. 1 0. 1. 1 ... .:f 31 LENGTH OF SECTIONS OF RAIL SHALL BE MEASURED ,0--ES Efpe-x - 3''I.. ' , 10 1%- ELEY&IION C-- t. :k Non lhAnk grout with AND THEN DMDED TO DETERMINE THE CORRESPONDING Â· . g~~~~~Q[~641~4, A i | Â· 4â€¢' DETECT,aE Â¥6,0â€¢NG W - 1.4. 1 % -00~ZET- I. h. -an ultimate EQUIDISTANT HANDRAIL SPACING SPAN LENGTH. Â· , 1 7. : . PAERs Ib ,-,1.1 r Â£ 104. 21. 14: 4 10"Z A ' Â·.4 Â· .Â·'Â·7- ' of 5000 0,1, min. 4. ALL HANDRAIL MATERIAL TO BE SELF WEATHERING . .m.gambLM= I 218LV/GE compr-tvo *trength ~ .,6.3~ [ ~Â·.:~ 43't*1. ts;k,4ibio~â€¢Â· ~ au~ Ag 1-' , 1.... -2) #4 REBAR CONT. ~on~motfe hole (typ.) ELEmIIQN STEEL PER ASTM A847. - 4 3/2 0*k D-GE WEEP HOLE SHALL BEE EQUAL IN 5. ALL MATERIAL â„¢ICKNESSES TO BE 0.125" UNLESS BOTH DIRECTIONS NOTED OTHERWISE. .SECEQN_8:=8 TRUNCATED DOME DETAIL + El : : : - #4 REBAR 18" O 20-00 0.(Â· podtion. - Pwible post .-- ~ .- Post â€¢ NOT TO SCALE Edge of - concrete- 41) 6 \-8Â» RETAINING WALL (IYP.) j. Ur x r x 8. . .1. a.gg=QU egg~L-gQN~mQU ELAbl SECTION A-A' SECTION B-B' NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED HANDRAIL PROPOSED 6" m / (SEE DETAIL) - EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER 7 2"-3"7 2 0 0.4,-Â·v. 4-; . :'t.';'0x BUFF CUT -Vi~M- DRYE 9, ' m WALL TO BE REMOVED ~ 1/2Â» EXPANSION JOINT â€¢ EXISTING RETAINING FINISH GRADEM / -- \! la -,;'SANDSTONE -- r--1 1 21- L-- -J UÂ», / ALONG PORTION OF VERT. REIN. BUFF CUT ~ PLANTING SANDSTONE SOIL MIX .'~/0 16"04 18" 6" CONCRETE SLAB FINISH GRADE '*tihÂ£ NEW RETAINING WALL AS SPECIFIED _Lu 4" CONCRETE BLOCK , W/ Wl.4 x Wl.4 . 1 4.. C . Â·. 4 ..i: :,1 4.,1 REINF. CONCREE EXISTING SIDEWALK J V(@6 0 L STEMWALL / 6" x C WELDED WIRE FABRIC .. . . 1.. SlEPS W/ #4 BARS TO BE REMOVED / AND CONTROL JOINTS 10' OC 11-111-111-............1 -1. 4 /12' EACH WAY //24)' -IN-lpf~:22.... 0Â· u. 21 . 1 .9.*36Â« 1 I ....' .7 - -' 1 2% SLOPE '9.:. '..4 .// . I 8. CONCREIÂ¥2~25-1-22--E~ # 1.'Mial|EAL"...2. *~Â·Â·'12 ~~ ' - -- PROPOSED RETAINING /i. 0-* HEIGHT VARIES 0 Â· '~~ - 3 1/2'' 16 ..4 / ~Fh2 1 Â·174' 13 1/2. WALL SIZE AND J . 1Â· =1 1 IE Â·Â·;~Â· 7 : 4 00:111=1 1 El i 12142Â· ' Â· Â· . 4 /e. . . 4.1 -u le J Â·Â·t l I. ~ALL STRUCTURAL BACKFILL REINFORCING TO BE 4" PERF. DRAIN UNE Â®Â·a==6; 2<] r TO BE COMPACTED TO 11all.Â·*:Â·Â· lEi L[7 ~ -fl'Ellht.... ...... Â· BEDDED IN WASHED â€¢ ' . -Â»42.-' .A 95% STANDARD PROCTOR 1/7 EXPANSION JOINT DETERMINED x - z Di'Â©311:2 - 1- AGGREGATE DRAIN . - 1 TO DAYLIGHT |~~--(2) #4 CONT. FINISH GRADE I lei-n<j 1 . Â·Â·Â· 4. I '.1 -1 I leill= 1 ... 4 F vARIEse) .. /f.-1,/ E \ I '' t-H Â·'4 0-'f *Â·Â·Â·~'.'F .':"5:. I "1Â·''~ .~ ''r/~ L PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE 0 .....1 COURnfARD SEAT WALL DETAIL REINF. CONCRETE FOOTING _1 DEPTH VARIES WITH SITE 777- , ........... NOT TO SCALE CONDITIONS VARIES(â€¢) -*= 1-111Ellimill- 111=111 (*)-ALL RETAINING WALL SIZES COMPACTED GRAVEL AND REINFORCING TO BE OR SUBGRADE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT PHASE CONCRETE STAIR DETAIL PROPOSED SIDEWALK LOWER COURTYARD RETAINING WALL Â»DR ve?/ES 1-1/21 1-1/2* R AREA 3" ASPHALT LAYER (VIGININA DR.) NOT TO SCALE ASPHALT PARKING NOT TO SCALE (SEE PLAN) ~Â· |r-Â·~1 ~ 4Â»ASPHALT LAYER (PARK LANE) 6' WIDE COMPAC75) GRAVE. C COMPACTED BASE REVISION: OR UNDISTURBED DATE: BY: PROiCI I\IU. PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT SOIL F 7 /5Â» _L 0*/08/07 %1Kht'&WER'IMENTS .M . LOT 1 05/30/07 CURB & GUTTER/SIDEWALK DETAIL . â€¢ .aa, Â£ PARK LANE SUBDIVISION â‚¬ c 4 ESTES PARK, COLORADO CORNE#STONE 7 SHEET TITLE: NOT TO SCALE - PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT CONCRETE PAN DETAIL I - I NOT TO SCALE DESIGNED BY JLR APPROVED BY _EMEL JOB NO. -* ET SHEET DETAILS mICENE~'0 a Â£47(Gk- 1 SURVEYB,a ING ~m~â„¢OliPSON Nk~.2#f~ (970) 686-2468 DRAWN IY -118. DATE MAY 2007 205.036 23 CUENT: WAG CORPORATION mn= PAR, co. 80517 pv FAX (970) 686-8460 CHECKED BY KUP SCALE AS SHOWN Â£ r. , 11 ONINIÂ¥138 M:\CES_Jobs\205_BASIS_ARCH\205_036_Pork Lone\Development\ParkLone-Development-COMPLETE.dwg, 6/12/2007 8:22:33 AM, JLR PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT LOT 1, PARK LANE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 10 0 10 20 30 SCALE 1" = 10' V F 19.1 .#hÂ·E \ t. 87Â·Â·111 2.Â· Â·.Â·.: S:....i & . .1....1 -1. ..1 ... 1 . : MS.':1,Â·'~~'~~A, . 41 'i~'~r~Z,.71>Â·4;~; Â» 0 ... 6 4 Â· Â·Â·. 4...:94 Â·14 Â«(. 42:'.6.:.. 4 ' Tc : :3Â¢-f~;}:~35)*i~Â·---r:Â·rdÂ·~jÂ·44 I / I. 4. . 1 .Ill i-- //h/ ....~ 6.p (3r~~ ~~ : 1. \ 71: i -~Â·,;ii :Â·-:~ g .,.:.p:. ' .El : 1.- 32.8 (3rd) 13.0 0 4 . 0 0 E- M?.0 Or .16 . i 0- 1 A.A.,,.1, 710. t,-F:-11.- A S 4 04 44 .,a A.4 e 24.0 (3rd) U , , M#:..1 -i.VIi:.~ 1-k:.it',~' Â·Â· N â‚¬19. 11.D 664 04\ 744Â·: Â·;)*Â·7 . 6,4 -r- 3.,4 /1 Â· O 29 4 f . I. 9 0. 9,\ 1.'' :' h'*.. *. eft - -il - , - . \ 1 20 \ 0.\\ . :> \ \\\ . | f.'~Â·~'-6, v |- 9.8 (3rd) -4 - .f. \ < 1 :.CO'' . ' 1 /~~4- ~1 \ d. 4 0.:. ..~Â·q: 1.2-:- :-:: ~)'Â·f:,: 135 (10 ~ ~ . , ..1 0 \ Â·ir i.Â·i.. .4....il:'t . ' .1 7,6 \ \ \\/ -//-//-1 4 . ....4,4 . . 1. . .... 8 4 . P \ 2/ 1 \ . '=:.. 33; ;t, ..1.1 :1 . :41 . ' *-2,1 -, .9 . -. 0.366* ACRES , Â·71 %<.9 ~ 4.9 (2nd) , ..,4 I , 15.934* SF '(., 1.Â·2â‚¬1 7 \ I k i Â·Â· f . 4 Â· I .... I 2% I I . I i' ~ 5. :, :.Â·/k . . I LOT 1 7Â«9\\ * Â·95, 0 . 1 -. ... - Â· - Â· .. . 43.,A'.~ Â· . a.Â· . I I ' I Â» C . ' 71 -i ; 4.Â·it ...â€¢ I I ' ./ I...\ bill E- Â·Â· 1 \ 1 / .4 4. .4 4. .2 FLe'.X..~,1...21 1-. . . , . '0 -1. V 1 // I ' p ..,1 - --- -- x-_ Â»/i~ ~ 4.>q~ 1â‚¬:-*, 1 . , 9. .... - 1 . 1 -- , -- I W ., . -. '. - ' I-' ~.'I 6 4 8 / 0 i ...4. .... . .1. 1 ./ - t .... ..A ., 9 . . 6~ 3rd) -uÂ·na.-. 1 ... .... t. 04 81 e . -2 1. 4.4 r . .21, ..r U .1 0 0.- \ ./ . I. 1... 15 7,4 0, // \ ... 14 . . -r ....2- 12 . 0. p 3 Â¥ .. r :ty..A} ..... \ ,/./. E. ,--.. /3 00 \ ~ ~tÂ¥(,2 a / 'P. \\ , 9 9 11 .â€ž ~ ~0 ....... / ..' A..p ,12'~4,.~-~ #, 0~ 106.:1 3 -P.t,1 - 0. 1.U 4. 41 v:, O . n 2 D>â„¢2. 0 4 - '3Â·. f \ \ D ..'. 1-<44., O. * <'1 09> â€¢0)' ef' 46 / . . , . I r Â· i...$:.A:,1 9.0% . * 4. . ... 0.0 , I ... . \ . .. I -- . f. 1 024 I ... Â· 1 \ v ' \ # 1 \\\ \\ .Â· v - - â‚¬ ':,Art WI., . 1 1 ~ 3rd 206 Â· i. 0 1. .. . ..9 , d.c 13;- 1 -4 .4. In 1 1 '.1 1,21: ~ 1 ..~ Â·' 4 * .Â·Â·Â·' Â·L ': 2-2> --3 ' 92'5>99. 7/: 2- 4 -5 , --%1.0 \ -- ,...TA,/ 0 I , -:94;05 1 61 '7 5 - ..7 1, +1>Â¥j;.Al.44.:..,1 1094 1.; - ':.: .. 9~"Â·Si,L~'â€¢,~~',12*6136&,1.~2?00-,tiv':t~Â·:,6--6 .Â¥ I ' ' -- - -- 4 . - "42â‚¬421 1,1 - I I . A ' 1 6'01* d Â· . . I ... I. . .4 1 \ \ 1 Ill ..\ \ \ \\\ \ 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 2.4.:11 t..%~).f'.4(4,41:41.~y..1.':h.j!:...~~9.1~~.6 <i'.Â· J. 1 \ \\ 9.72' \ h \ \ \ 1 1 j i .2- Â·. '3.~44< ~.22'" m<-4 :4:3:5 3, 14~.4, 9%'-t''i~~:."<.';.\ \\ \ \ \ '.:22,1-2;L:*5444|'PTEre=9:114t.:t : \\ 1 \ li \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ NOTES: 1) Landscaping is not required as part of a Commercial Downtown Delevopment. This plan is a representation of possible plantings that may occur. LEGEND: Landscaping is required for the parking lot bordered by Virginia Drive (2-trees & 6-shrubs). U~ Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· SHRUB -JUNIPER 2) All landscaping shall be automated drip irrigated. -POTENTILLA -KARL FORESTER (GRASS) 3) Conifer trees shall be sized as 50% eight feet tall and 50% six feet tall at -BARBERRY planting. 4) Deciduous trees shall be sized as 50% four inch caliper and 50% two in caliper at planting. ORNAMENTAL TREE -%.A,>- -SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE (MALUS SPRING SNOW) DATE: REVISION: BYÂ· PROJECT T\TUÂ·. PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT 5) Shrubs shall be five gallon container or larger at planting. %Â¤%51& tiNMEwirRMENTS LOT 1 PARK LANE SUBDIVISION CORNE#sTONE 6) All planting material shall meet the American Association of Nurserymen 1 * 1 Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· BORDER TREE SHEET TITLE: ESTES PARK. COLORADO specifications for Number 1 grade, and shall comply with quality standards -PAâ„¢ORE ASH (FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA) PARK LANE DEVELOPMENT of the Colorado Nursurey Act, Title 35, Article 26, C.R.S., as amended. DESIGNED BY JLR APPROVED SY KMP JOB NO. SHFFT SHEET LANDSCAPE ENaommUNG & gS, 1 81=V=11Â«1 Itc 7) All trees shall be staked or guyed and fenced to protect from wildlife damage. CHECKED BY KUP SCALE AS SHOWN 33 CUENT: DRAWN IY _-,168__ DATE MAY 2007 Mit/RE<WE VA/414 (m, MEN. 205.036 WAG CORPORATION =rm PABI. Co. 80617 Nâ‚¬/ FAX (970) 886-â€¢468 O,0 ~1,0 09 3.0 prd) .0 (3rd) M:\CES_Jobs\205_BASIS_ARCH\205_036_Pork Lane\Development\PorkLane-Developrnent-COMPLETE.dwg, 6/12/2007 8:22:11 AM, JLR / 2-07.P... I , v Wildfire Minor Subdivision ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ...,.......~ Estes Park, CX) 80517 -- Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: June 19, 2007 N i.p A AN. ... REQUEST: Divide one lot into two. . USFS LOCATION: 1775 Wildfire Road, within the - Town of Estes Park. 6.-L., 36 APPLICANT: Long's Peak Development, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: Ron Gordon 94 STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Estes Park Surveyors and Engineering (Paul Kochevar), 586-5175 Parcel Number: 2520000008 Development Area: 2.138-acres Number of Lots: One existing, two proposed Existing Land Use: Residential, mini-storage Proposed Land Use: Same Existing Zoning: "CH" Heavy Commercial Adjacent Zoning- East: North: West: South: Adjacent Land Uses- East: "RM" Multi-family North: "R-1" Residential (single-family) West: "CH" Heavy Commercial South: "E" Estate Services- Water: Town Sewer: UTSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to divide one lot into two separate lots. No road right-of-way or utility extensions are required, and both lots with front an existing street; therefore, this qualifies as a minor subdivision. The subject property has an approved development plan, which is undergoing revision to accommodate the proposed subdivision (see Development Plan 05- 08A). The changes to the development plan include relocation of the existing single-family dwelling to the eastern portion of the site, and planned mini-storage units relocated from the eastern portion ofthe site to where the house now sits. The applicant also requests to change the limited hours of operation, which were originally restricted due to the adjacent residential development. REVIEW CRITERIA: Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. This proposal complies with subdivision standards set forth in Chapter 10 "Subdivision Standards." Other design standards apply to the development plan. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision ofpublic services. Town Attorney H/hite requested a small change to the dedication statement, which has been done. Water Department. The Water Department noted the subdivision "the existing parcel into two lots will require a water main extension to proposed Lot 1." Public Works Department had comments regarding the extension of Wildfire Road, which for matters of convenience have been included in comments regarding the development plan. However, the requirement to extend the road to the western property line is a function of the subdivision of the property, and approval of this subdivision should be contingent upon extending Wildfire Road to the western property line. The development plan shows this road extension. Minor Subdivision. The development code requires the planning commission find that approval of a minor subdivision will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives ofthis Code. Public Improvements. All required improvements shall be completed and guaranteed in compliance with Section 10.5.K of the EVDC. This includes specific requirements concerning the form of guarantee, improvement agreement, time for completion, and warranty. Page #2 - Wildfire Minor Subdivision Plat Notice. The applicant/owner is hereby notified EVDC Â§10.2.A states "No owner or agent of the owner of any land located within an addition or subdivision shall transfer, sell, agree to sell or negotiate to sell any land by reference to, exhibition of or by the use of a plan, plat or map of an addition or subdivision before such plan, plat or map has been approved pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 3 of this Code and recorded in the office of the clerk and recorder of Larimer County, Colorado." Monuments. Per Section 10.5.I, all subdivisions shall be monumented in accordance with State law. Recording Timefi'ame. Per EVDCÂ§3.9.F.1, within thirty days of the Town Board's approval of the plat, the developer shall submit the plat for recording. If the plat is not submitted for recording within this thirty day time period, the approval shall automatically lapse and be null and void. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 2. Development Plan 05-08A addresses General Development Standards set forth in Chapter 7, including adequate public facilities. 3. Approval of this minor subdivision will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this Code. 4. This is a Planning Commission recommendation to the Town Board; Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Wildfire minor subdivision CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Approval of Development Plan 05-08A "Amended Development Plan of North End Storage/Ertl Mechanical." 2. Compliance with memo from Jeff Boles to Bob Goehring dated 5/22/2007. 3. The applicant shall extend Wildfire Road to the western property line. This road extension shall comply with Town road design requirements, and shall include six-foot wide roadside shoulders (instead of sidewalk). SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the Wildfire minor subdivision plat to the Town Board of Trustees with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Page #3 - Wildfire Minor Subdivision Plat (Other options) DENIAL: I move to recommend DISAPPROVAL of the preliminary plat to the Town Board of Trustees because. . . (state reason for denial - findings). CONTINUANCE: I move to recommend CONTINUANCE of the plat to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance - Jindings). Note: The applicant must agree -in writing - to a continuance, otherwise the application is deemed approved. Page #4 - Wildfire Minor Subdivision Plat 5 3 Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 5/22/2007 Re: Wildfire Subdivision Metes & Bounds property, North End Storage Addition 1775 Wildfire Road After review of the Minor Subdivision Plat the Water Department has the following comments: 1) Original review of Development Plan 05-08 was with proposals regarding one property. Dividing the existing parcel into two lots will require a water main extension to proposed Lot 1. 2) Construction drawings are required for the project. Drawings must be approved and signed by the Utilities Director or designated representative prior to anv construction. All water line design and construction shall be done according to the Water Utility Policies and Standards. All water main lines and easements must be deeded to the Town of Estes Park. 3) Any water service line installation or replacement will require a Service Line Permit from the Building Department. 4) All irrigation service lines are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for containment purposes. The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Control Technician upon installation and annually there after. If you have any questions please contact the Cross-Connection Control Specialist at 970-577-3625. Upper Thompson Sanitation Disttict f PO Box 568 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 May 18, 2007 Dave Shirk Planner Town of Estes Pal P.O. Box 1200 Estes Pail[, CO 80517 Ret Wildfire Subdivision Metes and Bounds, North End Stoiage Addition 1775 Wildfire Road Dear Dave, The Disttict has reviewed the Minor Subdivision Plat for the Wildfire Subdivision. This action does not impact the Upper Thompson Sanitation District and therefore the District does not have any objections. Thank you foryour time. Sincerely, ise Reed W. Smedley Lines Superintendent UpperThompson Sanitation Disttict CC: Paul Kochevar Estes Park Suiveyors & Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 3047 Estes Paik, CO 80517 FAX: 970-586-5816 Email: pau10971@juno.com , GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 ,oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 May 22,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Minor Subdivision Plat - Wildfire Subdivision Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Dedication Statement dedicates streets. Since there are no streets or public rights-of-ways to be dedicated with this Plat, streets shall be removed from the Dedication Statement. If you have any questions, please dofot hesitate to give me a call. V54 TBulv Yours, u..O/( ~ Gregor>g. White GAW/ldr CC: Estes Park Surveyors, Paul Kochevar Fax: 970/586-5816 r C ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 Telephone 970-586-5175 Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX received at 970-586-5816 April 25,2007 W.O. 1019 Mr. Bob Joseph, Community Development Department Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Development Plan & Wildfire Subdivision - Statement of Intent Dear Bob: INTRODUCTION This proposal will divide an existing parcel in to two lots. Northend Storage, approved last year, is a mini-storage development which will occupy the west lot. Fewer storage units will be constructed as the lot size has been reduced. The east lot will be developed as a HVAC, Plumbing Service and Installation business. The home located on the west lot will be relocated to the easterly lot and remodeled. The property is located south of the attainable housing project - "The Neighborhood" and west of the Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) project - "Vista Ridge". Another EPHA project - "Talons Pointe" is located about 300 feet north of this site. Each of the above mentioned projects are in various stages of completion from near ground breaking to complete. The site is located about 3/4 of a mile north of US 34 on the west side of Dry Gulch Road (County Road 63E) and the north side of Wildfire Road. The physical address is 1775 Wildfire Road. It is about 2.1 acres in size and is currently zoned CH Commercial. The sole owner is Ronald J. Gordon. Longs Peak Development, LLC is developing the west lot and Karl and Pam Ertl will develop the east lot. The property adjacent to the north lot line is one parcel of about 10 acres size. A plat has been approved to construct 30 single family residences on small lots ranging in size from 7500 square feet to 22,000 square feet. The westerly boundary abuts a 2.2 acre parcel that is currently zoned CH Commercial. The property to the south is zoned E Estate and is currently vacant. It is about 7 acres in size. Â· f "~ ~i .>231 ,â€¢- *617 =0 2 0 V Tifft i!:1 11 - -' ~ 1 ' 1 1 li; Â·11 i j 31 - 11; IN ~-1 â€¢A,-r 1U Page 1 of 3 4 - ' .4...2 ill....,- L . . 4 0 0 April 25,2007 Bob Joseph, Town of Estes Park Wildfire Subdivision PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will include the development of 15,500 square feet of mini-storage (self storage) buildings. An addition will be added to the existing residence as well as the existing 50'X100' building. The new storage buildings will be constructed of steel to reduce the construction time and the long term maintenance of the buildings. In order to improve appearance, the lower 1/3 of the building will be clad with horizontal panels while the remainder of the wall will be vertical panels. The color of the buildings will be selected to blend with the surroundings: lower 1/3 light to medium taupe upper 2/3 light to medium beige roof medium tan, matte, no-glare finish doors medium green Four of the new buildings are 30 feet wide with lengths varying from 90 feet to 125 feet. The other new building is 25 feet to 35 feet wide by 150 feet in length. The interiors will have movable walls to allow flexibility in unit size matching demand as closely as possible - 5 feet by 10 feet, 10 feet by 12 feet, and 10 feet by 30 feet, etc. The type of building selected allows for a selection of a very low roof pitch. Overall building height for the new structures will be below 11 feet. The esthetics of the project buildings will be enhanced by a great deal of landscaping on the perimeter as well. Over 105 trees and 172 shrubs will be added to the site. For security purposes as well as esthetics, a 36" to 42" high, wood, rail fence will be placed along the sides and rear lot lines. In this manner, all of the landscaping will be between the buildings and the lot lines enhancing the appearance of the project from off-site. All utilities are in place to serve the home and the shop building. The remaining units will not be provided with any utility services. A new water service will be extended to provide for the landscape drip irrigation system ZONING This proposal will utilize some of the allowed uses within the CH-Commercial zoning district. The accompanying development plan details the various aspects of the project and demonstrates compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code. All the other uses within the CH zone are not automatically allowed. Only the development shown on the plan can be constructed. Page 2 of 3 1. I April 25,2007 Bob Joseph, Town of Estes Park Wildfire Subdivision The HVAC, Plumbing Service and Installation business will provide for inside storage of materials and equipment. In addition, the home on the site will house the family of one employee. Site visits by customers would not be a part of the proposed business at this time. Parking for employees can be accommodated within the drive area immediately to the south of the shop building. TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic generation from this project was analyzed to determine impacts to the level of service to Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road intersection. Mini-storage development does not generate very much traffic. Based upon the data assembled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, it would be realistic to anticipate an average daily trip count from this site of 22. One trip is in each direction - coming and again going out. 22 trips per day equates to the addition of two additional single residences on this property. At the Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road intersection, this project will increase the average daily traffic entering and exiting by about 5% (assuming build out of Vista Ridge, The Neighborhood and existing single family homes on Wildfire Road). SUBDIVISION PLAT A minor subdivision plat is being processed with this revised development plan to divide the site into two lots. It also adds utility easements along all the lot lines. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. (17-Ct- Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P.L.S. President cc: Karl & Pam Ertl, Steve Murphree Page 3 of 3 0, / r 14 1 1 ..... 5 + ESTES VALLEY . . . , , 0..=:i LO 1 ~14 J - :. ill DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 11 APR 2 5 Submittal Date: ,-11 351%1 , 2, i I L J. Type of Application N Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map F" Special Review F'- ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map r Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change .= Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension F'" Supplemental Map F Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify 9 Minor Subdivision Plat r Amended Plat General Information Project Name Wildfire Subdivision Project Description Divide One lot into two lots Project Address 1775 Wildfire Road Legal Description North End Storage Addition Parcel ID # 2520000008 Section 20 Township 5N Range 72W Site Information TotaIDevelopment Area (acres) 2.138 Existing Land Use Self Storage Units, War Proposed Land Use Self Storage Units, Mechanical Contractor Office, Warehouse & Employee Housing Existing Water Service 9 Town r Well 7 Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service P Town F Well F Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD 9 UTSD r- Septic Proposed Sanitary.Sewer Service EPSD 9 UTSD r Septic Is a sewer lift station required? E: Yes W No Existing Gas Service 9 Xcel f- Other i None Existing Zoning CH-Commercial Heavy Proposed Zoning Same Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? j Yes 9 No m Has site staking been completed? r Yes F No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Paul Kochevar Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments ~< Application fee * Statement of intent Â® 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan ~ 11 " X 17"reduced copy of plat or plan 1* Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. , r LI . m'1111111111- Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant p ConsultanVEngineer Record Owner(s) Ronald J. Gordon ~~~~~~ ~~~ , Mailing Address 3340 S. Rockwood Lane, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone 970=586=0370 - . 1 Cell Phone . Fax Email Applicant Longs Peak Development LLC Mailing Address P.O. Box 2945, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone 970-586-8770 Cell Phone -. -......... - r- Â·-1 - Fax 970-586-8770 Email C-"s :.7 i r ; 1 .,~ 1 I -==3 ~ULÂ·Â·Â· ..um ./ 1, Estes Park Surveyors & Enginee[R,-Inc. Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park CO 80517 3411 APR 2 5 m Phone 970.586-5175 1 1 ' 14 ueli pnone l !~ Fax 970-586-5816 i, --~ Emall BAL9971.--JUNO,32M.- - .-.- - --- -- -- lilli.1111111'11111 APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the Tee schedule online at www.estesnetcom/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees aredue atthelime of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001.-Housi, Elll 01-1088 became efK,ctiG,2hlis legislaticil requires applicants?6r bevelopment Plans, Special Reviews. Rezoning. Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House BiN 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met Names: Record Owner PLEASE PANT-- ~~>MA (C> (~C>-,20 014 Applicant PUEASEFFOYI-: 5,4*m:P.te,u f,1 ueerf age=- ARL g. ERIC Thman 3. BL Signatures: f ; 1 r-AA RecordOwrier 7(~ALAd~~*~ Date 7,20- 07 Applicantc::~/4#00*â‚¬4~ Des H - 2-0 -07 Ii' L. li.22 0, 1 , - L 'rl Z/9 'ON VMV,1 Ql I Â§1 9 1 R W,1 AG : C /AA7 '67 'WAW .. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION. * 1 hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of #le property. * In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement; I atknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Cod* (FVDC). A- 1 ackiowiedge that i have obtained or have awess to the EVDC, and that prior to fiting blhapplication, i have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code Is availabia onfine at www.astesnetcoirw'ComDevma-,Code.1 - I understand that aaceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of tfie *,mication fee > by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the Fvnc A ! criderstand that this proposal fnay be delayed in processing by a Inonth or Inore if the inforrnatlon provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. * I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. * The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the applicabon is determined to be completa * i grant pei-Tiussion for Town of Estes Pa=k anpioyees and Planning Commissioners witi proper identification av:,:.....- to my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that i have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to * meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. ILI zirnae - -. - . -- 1, 3 -' Record Owner PLEASE PRINT? tre#AL.Â£1 610800-4 Applicant pLEAsEPR/NT? SUPUE-7,/ Mvepir,~F /01/t-/42, ERTL- Bnela:I. 6*:1-6 Signatures: -Â£ A n Record Owner ~~Z~* - 00~Z Date 4 #-0 -07 - ~â€ži*:*6Â»-~ ~'*t*,0Â£5 Applicant Date ~ - 2 0 - 0 7 4/4460 --1 4 : f f; 11 (0 2 J V 1-,r, 5-4,\ 1 > 1,1 .1 1. /11 APR 2 5 1007 r ill " 1 ii 7 Â·1 7 7 A Â·râ€¢ i, ..,J 1 ..1.-1 -In mirrâ€¢r ;All .1 7 1.1 C C- 0 ANCONENAN 10 10 00 If) kg 1-0 Lo 10 OONO-000 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 co 00 (0 00 6 00 00 00 '80 00000000000=!OZOOo NOOOOO00000OO=-U aiOUU â‚¬*liâ‚¬ Ed M 22 2.00 (0 CO co - a; bl U) D- D- co J O-0- 0- Ca- W 0 0 0 0 5 C) a) (0 (DJ : 5 -92 : 9 0 0 co 0 (D - 0 LU LU LU LLI O. LU < 0 h CD 882;2 4- 00 N % ZON_00 -0 m c\12 1 INHO X xx XT Exxsxem 2 mmoo 000 02Â£2 e mOO cv 0218020068001201220 0- 00 00 0- 0- 0- 00 00 0- 0- - 0- 00 h 00 5 0 0 (D CE >â€¢ C A- 0 6- f= O - BE -8 E# 5 0 CO o r d 88 ~ ~ ~ -5 -~ ~ -~ 2,2 ~ ,- g -gl r 3 %2 2 71 W - Â£ O 2 %@@21.LIâ‚¬&.834=COMO EQ-0-22 0 800 E.Zd:#~ TN @%21%8~281â‚¬s -C 0 0 -O m (0 (0 .12 05 H-1.LILLIWE&52<~*iIM>m rossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. Estes 80517 arion D. Dougherty Crabapple Lane 80517 Linda Edmonds Crabapple Lane Estes Park, 80517 0517 0517 0517 Estes Park', 0517 Crabapple Lane 0517 pple Lane Estes Park, 0517 Estes Park, 0517 omeowners' Assoc. do Rita Kurelja PO Box 1200 Estes Park, Crabapple Lane Estes Park, oyette & ndra Williams 995 Dry Gulch Road Estes Park, undation fire Road oehl bapple Lane er, Trustee obin Avenue NE Owner Owner 11 Address UO!S!A!Pqns JOU!1/\1 84Wl!AA WILDFIRE SUBDIVISIO-N GOOD SAMARITAN SUB. ~ TALONS LOCATED IN THE NW]/4 OF SECTION 20, TbN, R72* OF THE @TH P.M TRACT B POINTE F'~ THE NEIGHBORHOOD | fc Â»ESERVE Ar 1 VISTA RIDGE 77\A/Al iuvviv OF ESTES PARK, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO r Fll SITE WILDFIR â‚¬ 1 \X lillifir-7 1 '' -31 111 //7 9 IIi 1 1.i 41,Uy / RANCH EN[ ['1939 - / MEADOWS , IFIDM mle \ 1 1 1 1 1 THE NEIGHBORHOOD 1(BOSAN ADDITION) 1 1 \ ) 1 1 SET .f~\.> 4.1 &Â·21 1 \ 1--11 X LOT 19 1/2" DIA. REBAR WITH PLASTIC LOT 15 LOT 16 LOT 17 LOT 18 1 1 \ CAP NO. 15760 \ NW CORNER | | | | FOUND \ /-NORTH END STORAGE ADDITION I S 89Â°55'59"' E 381.77' 1 ' 3/4" PIPE BEARING 1 - 1 N18.16'10â€žIE A DISTANCE OF VICINITY MAP-1~ -r~ LAKE ~A~ 0.54' FROM THE TRUE CORNER 1- = 1200' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Â»1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lil ill i i I *< 883 ESTES \L - 1 Â· 46.27 4/ 196.97' 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 184.80'_ i ~- .k / 1 Ul N ado ..e 04 014 A r~========it I 1 /2" DIA. REBAR WITH PLASTIC . t. I S 89'48'19" E 139.69' Z[(N Â· ~. DJ irrn==Â·=-------77 111 0/ I CAP NO. 15760 M 1 / 1 FOUND & 111 111 1/2" DIA. REBAR WITH PLASTIC - - -17 - -7 -7 -Â· Â· f. 2 1 11" | 1/2" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP .: CAP NO. 15760 F\/-1/11 Â·/ 873 111 875 ~ 111 11 111 ~ NO. 6499 BEARING NOO'02'58"E / 4 A DISTANCE OF 0.39' FROM THE , xt- /1 , h EAST 16.8 '' VISTA RIDGE 6 1 i TRUE CORNER / 04. / f -mr 9- - 2 (ESTES PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY) hi / O '.'lI / i - S 89'48'19" E 126.68' Â· \ 2 RM ZONING Ail 1 8 1 5/ 1 /\X / V Q kul / \ a CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION ~1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT RONALD J. GORDON AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ESTES PARK BEING THE OWNERS AND LIENHOLDERS OF THAT PART OF THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 20. T5N, 1 2 E o / PRIVATE, SHARED DRAINAGE EASEMENT - ~-*R72W OF THE STH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: NORTH END STORAGE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. COLORADO, ~ EASEMENTS TO BE KNOWN AS THE PLAT OF 5 1 0- z TO SERVE LOT 1 AND LOT 2 4 4 CONTAINING 2.138 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND BLOCKS, PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE ACCESS / 1- 2 0 0- N WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION )( 1 -94~~ i < ~44 AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO AND FOR THE PUBLIC USE THE EASEMENTS; OTHER THAN UTILITY EASEMENTS, PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRIVATE DRAiNAGE EASEMENTS, AS ARE LAID 4 F! r P O 1 4 /5 7 CD # OUT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT, AND DO ALSO DEDICATE UTiLITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES AND FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES AS ARE LAID OUT 1..1 AND DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT, f 1 9\ \\ k 7 f f 871 WITNESS OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS DAY OF , 2007. \ /0/ 0 94* g i / *7 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ESTES PARK hi 1! I.4 k, . =1 30/ 7 RONALD J. GORDON ? Â· 77 /4 1 4 BY: LARRY L. SAINT -1./ 9 3// d AS: VICE PRESIDENT : ~ 7 869 10)1 H t. h e' ~ / h.1 1% STATE OF COLORADO) V- 4 - )ss LOT 1 LOT 2 COUNTY OF LARIMER) 1.1 CO. 44 -81% 0- + THE FOREGOING DEDICATION WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _ DAY OF , 2007 A.D. BY RONALD J. GORDON. Â£ E' 1.216 ACRES O.922 ACRES 871 f / 4 I LU Â·5 Cl 52,970 SQUARE FEET 40,178 SQUARE FEET & 512'04'fF , WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL Â°"1 O -AL. .J4, e / -1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 33% i 2/1 4 4 NOTARY PUBLIC 0 | STATE OF COLORADO) / 4, /31 0# 2 1j 0. m /1 CO 0 O COUNTY OF LARIMER) 11 0 6/ 1 ,%1 4 e r i o /-7 r-- 4 0 THE FOREGOING DEDICATION WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS _- DAY OF , 2007 A. D. BY LARRY L SAINT AS VICE PRESIDENT FOR FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ESTES PARK. 0./ \ b /1: 91 // 865 ~ Â·~? 6.0 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. b i bA A # eff Il MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Z. fP4 NOTARY PUBLIC 1 v) 4- - 11 . :IN 0 40 30' WIDE, PRIVATE, SHARED ACCESS AND i 1 44 --24 2 4 DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO SERVE LOT 1 AND LOT 2- 7 / /' 1 4 0 0 /~ 863 40 '- BOARD oF TRUSTEE'S CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL 4-/ . O/ U APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, ON THIS ______ DAY OF , 2007 A.D. 01 + id 2 / t 0 TOWN CLERK MAYOR | PRIVATE, SHARED DRAINAGE EASEMENT I 1 u. It 4 1 /4 0- ~ ' TO SERVE LOT 1 AND LOT 2 0 ~Â«11*- /1 11 11 11 R = 1030.00' 11 L = 199.32' / \4 4 861 4 SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE D = 1 1 Â°05'1 5" ~~ - - 3<7Â£*114 / 71 1, PAUL M. KOCHEVAR, A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OFCOLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT OF WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION Ij e / 11 TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. C = N82Â°16'06"W -44,32Â£, li 15 L ___ - 199.01' 7' -4- ,& CL PAUL M. KOCHEVAR, P.E. & P.L.S. NO. 15760 U <2> .-/ / . -174 / 1% E C lE o V 3-76 09/ ///'' 4 0 --* VESTED RIGHTS STATEMENT - APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT CREATES A VESTED RIGHT FOR THREE YEARS, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S., AS AMENDED. 1 /2- .: W â€¢â€¢ --0/ 8 GENERAL NOTES: EXISTING WOOD FENCE O 1/25'DIA. REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP NO. . I-I--IL_ I / , a UTILITY EASEMENT 15760 AS REFERENCE CORNER - ~~~~-L-Â£-L_/ 1,. / 1..... -N-.74.20' .1 / 0 0 BEARING NOO'02'58"E A DISTANCE OF - W 44<61, et 3.50' FROM THE TRUE CORNER ~~ . 4 I UTILITY R = 1030.00' R = 1030.00' O --=44,4,6/ / , cp~ CAP NO. 15760 EASEMENT TOTAL CURVE , 0 2,-4466 ./ I-10' --* 4 ~ Sri- A 1/2" DIA. REBAR WITH PLASTIC LEGEND: 0 (534- 19.91'Â· '41 FOUND O INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED Â© ESTES PARK SUR\/EYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. 2007 L = 258.40' L = 59.08' 1" STEEL PIN BEARING * INDICATES SET 1/2" REBAR W/ PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "PLS 15760" ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. 0 D = 14Â°22'27" D = 03Â°17'12" .- 0 :.Â» 7 N18'16'10"E A DISTANCE OF P.O. BOX 3047 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BLDG. 2,1 0/- 0.28' FROM THE TRUE CORNER .... INDICATES EXISTING TOWN CORPORATE OMITS ESTES PARK, COLORADO SUITE 204 Of~ 80517 C = N80Â°37'32"W C = N75Â°04'55"W --- (970) 586-5175 ( S89'53'00"E 188.25' ) DEED DIMENSIONS ROTATED TO MATCH BEARING BASIS __ _ 59.06' :41 ell S89*53'00"E 188.25' ACTUAL DIMENSIONS PROJECT: WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION - 257.73' A 1/ WILDFIRE (60' /L- IN89Â°56'13"W 28.57' - DRAWN BY: PMK CHECKED BY: GRAPHIC SCALE PUBLIC 1 ADS ROAD 20 0 10 20 40 80 DATE: APRIL 25,2007 LONGS PEAK DEV. LLC 1 .- 6 2-7 - 2 1 14 131 E.lic,Â»4.+r=. .~ Â·9mR,3 REV: MAY 8,2007 P.O. BOX 2945 R.O.W. - BOOK 1899 AT PAGE 114) METES & BOUNDS TRACT m:~~ I Â· ~ REV: MAY 31, 2007 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 (STONER TRUST) (IN FEET ) REV: (970) 586-8770 E ESTATE ZONING _ SHEET: 1 OF: 1 PROJECT NO: 1019 1 inch = 20 ft. ,/Idi~4 -:.1 h?'*'exs ~ HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE TRACT 2 \\\\\\\\ 46 3 â€ž99,6Z.00 N BEARING BASIS ASSUMED 60' R.O.W. I ~ North End Storage Amended Development Plan ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 *I il0 Estes Park, CO 80517 - Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: June 19, 2007 REOUEST: Amend a development plan to change the location of buildings and allow an additional use. The existing development plan calls for mini-storage / units, and the proposed plan would also allow a building materials/storage use. LOCATION: The site is located at 1775 3, Wildfire Road, within the Town of Estes =in USFS A-,114 7 Park. 1*tioral F&* APPLICANT: Longs Peak Development, C.- USFS LLC (Steve Murphree, PO Box 2945, Estes Fa//1. ; k Park, CO 80517). 11 B/Dc 'ou,j* PROPERTY OWNER: Ron Gordon STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Estes Park Surveyors and Engineering (Paul Kochevar), 586-5175 Parcel Number: 2520000008 Development Area: 2.13-acres Number of Lots: One (Wildfire Minor Existing Land Use: Single-family residence, Subdivision to divide into two lots under commercial storage (limited warehousing), self-service mini-storage under construction review) Proposed Land Use: Self-Service Mini- Existing Zoning: "CO" Commercial Outlying Storage, Building Materials/Storage (with caretaker' s quarters) Adjacent Zoning- East: "RM" Multi-Family North: "R" Residential West: "CH" Heavy Commercial South: "E" Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Multi-family residential (including North: Single-family residential (including 1111 : 41 t attainable housing) attainable housing) West: Heavy Commercial (excavation South: Undeveloped 11-acre parcel company) Services- Water: Town Sewer: UTSD Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: In October 2005, the Planning Commission approved Development Plan 05-08, which outlined the development of Self-Service Mini-Storage units. This is a proposal to amend the development plan, with the following changes: move the existing dwelling toward the east property line, and relocate the units originally planned for that area to where the dwelling currently sits. This means the southeast corner of the lot will be for residential use instead of mini-storage, which is a better "neighbor" for the condominiums to the east. The purpose of this change is to allow a Building Materials/Storage operation (Ertl Mechanical). The Board of County Commissioners rezoned the property from "CO" to "CH" in 2005 to allow the mini-storage units, and included these conditions of approval: 1. Approval of and compliance with Development Plan 05-08. Staff comment: The planning commission can amend Development Plan 05-08 along with associated conditions of approval. The applicant wants to change an original condition of approval that limited hours of operation to 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM. This condition was to minimize disturbance of the residential property to the east (there are seven residential units approximately forty feet from the planned storage unit location). The applicant asks to amend that condition of approval to allow operation to begin at 6:30 AM. 2. Use shall be limited to the approved development plan for the North End Storage (development plan 05-08). Any change in land use shall require approval of the Governing Body. Staff comment: The change from Self-Service Mini-Storage to Building Materials/Storage is a change in land use, and the Town Board must approve this request. The Town Board will hear this at the same time as the proposed Minor Subdivision. 3. The applicant shall file for annexation to the Town of Estes Park within three months of approval df th@ rezoning and development plan. Staycomment: The property annexed into the Town in June 2006. Page #2 - North End Storage Amended Development Plan REVIEW CRITERIA: This development plan is subject to applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). Depending upon the complexity of the project, this section may be a brief summary of the standards of review or may involve a more detailed analysis of the standards based upon issues relevant to any particular project. Zoning Requirements. The "CH" Commercial Heavy district allows both Self- Service Mini-Storage and Building Materials/Storage. Employee housing is an allowed accessory use, subject to the provisions of Section 5.2.C.2.a of the Estes Valley Development Code (the relocated yellow house will be considered an employee housing unit under terms of the EVDC). This section requires a restrictive covenant, subject to review and approval of the Town Attorney. This protective covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Grading and Site Disturbance. Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance Standards" applies to this proposal. No grading, excavation or tree/vegetation removal shall be permitted, whether to provide for a building site, for on-site utilities or services or for any roads or driveways, before issuance of a building permit. All disturbed areas shall be restored in accordance with Section 7.2.C "Restoration ofDisturbed Areas." Landscaping and Buffers. The proposed landscape plan satisfies all landscaping requirements, including district buffer. Exterior Lighting. The proposed development will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. The proposed buildings will not have any lighting, nor is any additional security lighting proposed. The light on the existing building should be retrofitted to comply with Section 7.9. Operational Performance Standards. Section 7.10 "Operational Performance Standards" allows for specific conditions to "be imposed upon the approval of any development to ensure that it is compatible with existing use." The applicant desires to change an original condition of approval that limited hours of operation to 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM. This condition was to minimize disruption to Page #3 - North End Storage Amended Development Plan the residential property to the east (there are seven residential units approximately forty feet from the planned storage unit location). The applicant asks to amend that condition of approval to allow operation to begin at 6:30 AM. Staff recommends any allowance for operations before 8:00 AM be limited to proposed Lot 2, and allow only indoor operations prior to 8:00 AM. History. The propedy used to house a bakery delivery service, which began daily operations at 2:00 AM. That service was in operation before the Vista Ridge development. The Board of County Commissioners took the 2005 rezoning request as an opportunity to expand the potential list of uses on the property, but at the same time to impose stricter hours of operation in order to minimize potential conflicts between the heavy commercial and residential land uses. Adequate Public Facilities. Transportation. A Traffic Impact Analysis was submitted with this proposal. This TIA was based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers "Trip Generation" manual. Based on ITE projections, mini-storage units generate 14 average trips per day per unit, and .03 trips per unit in a peak hour; this equates to twenty-two trips per day and two trips per peak hour for this development. For a comparison, the Vista Ridge multi-family development is projected to generate 346 trips per day and 32 trips per peak hour. Drainage/Water Quality Management. Section 7.2.B8 Detention/Stormwater Facilities states "where detention basins and other storm and erosion control facilities may be required, any adverse visual and aesthetic impacts on the natural landscape and topography shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible [see figurel." Therefore, Staff recommends drainage swales be grass swales instead of rip-rap wherever possible. The stormwater outlet at the northeast corner needs further definition of where the water will flow after leaving that facility. Staff understands there will be a grass swale following the lot line of Lot 18 and Lot 19 to the north, but there is no design. This needs to be finalized. Based on this, Staff suggests Public Works should review and approve a revised stormwater plan. This can be a condition of approval. Sanitary Sewer. The existing house will continue to utilize the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. The new buildings will not have any sanitary sewer service. Water. The applicant will install service lines for the dwelling and irrigation system from main located near the southeast property corner. Page #4 - North End Storage Amended Development Plan Fire Protection. The submitted ISO calculations indicate adequate fire flow is available from existing hydrants. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Neighbor Correspondence. During the original review, Staffreceived numerous letters of opposition from residents of the adjacent Vista Ridge development. These concerns included: potential for negative impact on property values; change in nature of area; traffic impact; potential for storage of hazardous substances; noise; precedent for future commercial expansion; and general opposition. Because of this, conditions o f approval included limited hours of operation and exterior lighting. No additional comments have been received as of Tuesday, June 5,2007. Public Works. Public Works had several comments that have been addressed, and suggested the applicant confirm that water service be 5' below new proposed roadside drainage ditch. See recommended conditions of approval for those comments yet to be addressed. Comments from the Light and Power Department and Water Department have been included as suggested conditions of approval. These are typical comments regarding their respective needs. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. If all recommended conditions of approval are required, the development plan will comply with all applicable standards set forth in this Code. 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A deed restriction for the employee-housing unit shall be recorded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. The Planning Commission is the decision-making body for the development plan. The proposed change of use is subject to approval of the Town Board. Approval of the development plan shall serve as a recommendation of approval of the proposed change in land use to the Town Board. Page #5 - North End Storage Amended Development Plan Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the amended development plan 05- 08(A) CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Lot 1 hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Lot 2 hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM, except Lot 2 operations shall be allowed to begin at 6:30 AM for operations within enclosed structures. 2. No additional exterior lighting shall be allowed. 3. The light on the existing building shall be retrofitted to comply with Section 7.9 prior to issuance of a building pennit for the new structures. 4. All metal portions of the buildings shall be a matte finish to minimize reflection of light. 5. All walls visible from off site shall be constructed ofwood or stone. 6. Per Section 5.2, the mechanism used to restrict the unit shall be approved by the Town Attorney, and recorded prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 7. Drainage swales shall be grass swales instead of rip-rap wherever possible. 8. Public Works shall review and approve a revised stormwater plan. 9. Compliance with memo from jeff Boles to Bob Goehring dated 5/22/2007 regarding this project. 10. Compliance with memo from Mike Mangelsen to Bob Goehring dated 5-23-07 regarding this project. 11. A recorded driveway maintenance agreement shall be submitted with first building permit application. This agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the Town Attorney prior to recording. 12. A recorded drainage agreement shall be submitted with first building permit application. This agreement shall be subject to review and approval of the Town Attorney prior to recording. 13. Lot size shall be shown on the drawing. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move APPROVAL of the amended development plan 05-08(A) with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. Page #6 - North End Storage Amended Development Plan Water Department Inter-Office Memorandum To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 5/22/2007 Re: Wildfire Subdivision (Northend Storage Revised Development Plan) Proposed Lots 1 & 2, Wildfire Subdivision TBD Wildfire Road After review of the Revised Development Plan 05-08A the Water Department has the following comments: 1) Original review of Development Plan 05-08 was with proposals regarding one property. Dividing the existing parcel into two lots will require a water main extension to proposed Lot 1. 2) Construction drawings are required for the project. Drawings must be approved and signed by the Utilities Director or designated representative prior to anv construction. All water line design and construction shall be done according to the Water Utility Policies and Standards. All water main lines and easements must be deeded to the Town of Estes Park. 3) Any water service line installation or replacement will require a Service Line Permit from the Building Department. 4) All irrigation service lines are required to have an approved backflow prevention device installed for containment purposes. The device will be tested by a Certified Cross-Connection Control Technician upon installation and annually there after. If you have any questions please contact the Cross-Connection Control Specialist at 970-577-3625. 2% Town of Estes Park ~ Public works Engineering EL Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, qsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Dave Shirk, Planner From: Greg Sievers Date: May 21, 2007 Re: North End Storage Addition, 1775 Wildfire Road After reviewing the Minor Subdivision plat & Revised Development Plan 05-08A the Public Works Department has the following comments: (previous reviews done on September 23,2005) Engineering: 1. Clarify property size: The site plan references data for the 'east and west sites' and they total 92,035SF = 2.12 acres 2. Shouldn't the Property Description statement include the total site acreage? 3. Show H/C parking location. Note 7 states provision for Handicap accessibility. 4. This proposal shall complete roadway construction & paving to its west property line. 5. Show how utilities will be provided to both lots. New easements will be necessary for all crossings on other lots. 6. Confirm that water services be 5' below new proposed roadside drainage ditch? 7. The new access plan shall include a recorded shared driveway maintenance agreement. 8. Provide recorded drainage maintenance agreement for storm water and facilities. 9. Reference the drainage report by details and date (9/2005) is applicable or provide new report. 10. Provide 6' roadside shoulder construction in lieu of sidewalk. 11. Provide new access plan for both lots on site plan. â€¢ Page 1 MEMORANDUM To: Dave Shirk, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: May 25,2007 Subject: Northend Storage Revised Development Plan Proposed Lots 1 & 2, Wildfire Subdivision TBD Wildfire Road The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for a Revised Development Plan for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: 1. The proposed property line must be a minimum of 10 feet from all commercial buildings to comply with the 2003 International Building Code. GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 May 22,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Revised Development Plan 05-08A - Wildfire Subdivision (Northend Storage Revised Development Plan) Dear Mr. Shirk: I have no comment. If you have any questions, please d~) not hesitate to give me a call. X6ry Yruly Yours, i \ if { r-- i # , / Grego* A. White GAW/ldr CC: Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Paul Kochevar Fax: 970/586-5816 Upper Thompson Sanitation District PO Box 568 Estes Pail[, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 May 18, 2007 Dave Shirk i Planner Town of Estes Paik P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Ref: Wildfire Subdivision (North End Stoiage Revised Development Plan) Pivposed Lots 1 & 2, Wildfire Subdivision TBD Wildfire Road Dear Dave, There is an existing UTSD sewer main in the road right-of-way and an existing 4" sewer service line to a residence on the property. The proposed detention pond is described right on top of the sewer seivice line. This could have an impact on the service. The depth of the pond should be taken into considention so that the service line does not freeze in the winter. A break-wall will need to be placed around the service line to prevent groundwater from following the sewer trench. Thank you foryour time. Sincerely, Reed W. Smedley Lines Superintendent Upper Thompson Sanitation Disttict CC: Paul Kochevar Estes Park Suiveyors & Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 3047 Estes Pail[,CO 80517 FAX: 970-586-5816 Email: pau10971@juno.com Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 05-23-07 Re: Wildfire Subdivision (Northend Storage Revised Development Plan) TBD Wildfire Road The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for a Revised Development Plan for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 2) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 3) We will in the future need accurate As-Builts in electronic, Mylar, and paper versions. 4) The submitted plan needs to show all existing utilities, type, and location. 5) Easements need to accompany new lot lines in new proposed locations. 6) Easements also need to accompany all existing primary electric lines and any secondary electric on others property. 7) The vacation of an easement is allowable if it is presently vacant with no chance of being occupied in the future. 8) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 9) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 10)All easements pertaining to Power must remain intact. 11)All primary electric must be buried 4' deep in a 4" conduit 1 I C 'r ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 Telephone 970-586-5175 Estes Park, CO 80517 FAX received at 970-586-5816 April 25,2007 W.O. 1019 Mr. Bob Joseph, Community Development Department Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Development Plan & Wildfire Subdivision - Statement of Intent Dear Bob: INTRODUCTION This proposal will divide an existing parcel in to two lots. Northend Storage, approved last year, is a mini-storage development which will occupy the west lot. Fewer storage units will be constructed as the lot size has been reduced. The east lot will be developed as a HVAC, Plumbing Service and Installation business. The home located on the west lot will be relocated to the easterly lot and remodeled. The property is located south of the attainable housing project - "The Neighborhood" and west of the Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) project - "Vista Ridge". Another EPHA project - "Talons Pointe" is located about 300 feet north of this site. Each of the above mentioned projects are in various stages of completion from near ground breaking to complete. The site is located about 3/4 of a mile north of US 34 on the west side of Dry Gulch Road (County Road 63E) and the north side of Wildfire Road. The physical address is 1775 Wildfire Road. It is about 2.1 acres in size and is currently zoned CH Commercial. The sole owner is Ronald J. Gordon. Longs Peak Development, LLC is developing the west lot and Karl and Pam Ertl will develop the east lot. The property adjacent to the north lot line is one parcel of about 10 acres size. A plat has been approved to construct 30 single family residences on small lots ranging in size from 7500 square feet to 22,000 square feet. The westerly boundary abuts a 2.2 acre parcel that is currently zoned CH Commercial. The property to the south is zoned E Estate and is currently vacant. It is about 7 acres in size. Page 1 of 3 're - r C. 1 4 . April 25,2007 Bob Joseph, Town of Estes Park Wildfire Subdivision PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project will include the development of 15,500 square feet of mini-storage (self storage) buildings. An addition will be added to the existing residence as well as the existing 50'X100' building. The new storage buildings will be constructed of steel to reduce the construction time and the long term maintenance of the buildings. In order to improve appearance, the lower 1/3 of the building will be clad with horizontal panels while the remainder of the wall will be vertical panels. The color of the buildings will be selected to blend with the surroundings: lower 1 /3 light to medium taupe upper 2/3 light to medium beige roof medium tan, matte, no-glare finish doors medium green Four of the new buildings are 30 feet wide with lengths varying from 90 feet to 125 feet. The other new building is 25 feet to 35 feet wide by 150 feet in length. The interiors will have movable walls to allow flexibility in unit size matching demand as closely as possible - 5 feet by 10 feet, 10 feet by 12 feet, and 10 feet by 30 feet, etc. The type of building selected allows for a selection of a very low roof pitch. Overall building height for the new structures will be below 11 feet. The esthetics of the project buildings will be enhanced by a great deal of landscaping on the perimeter as well. Over 105 trees and 172 shrubs will be added to the site. For security purposes as well as esthetics, a 36" to 42" high, wood, rail fence will be placed along the sides and rear lot lines. In this manner, all of the landscaping will be between the buildings and the lot lines enhancing the appearance of the project from off-site. All utilities are in place to serve the home and the shop building. The remaining units will not be provided with any utility services. A new water service will be extended to provide for the landscape drip irrigation system ZONING This proposal will utilize some of the allowed uses within the CH-Commercial zoning district. The accompanying development plan details the various aspects of the project and demonstrates compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code. All the other uses within the CH zone are not automatically allowed. Only the development shown on the plan can be constructed. Page 2 of 3 . CM CU. . April 25,2007 Bob Joseph, Town of Estes Park Wildfire Subdivision The HVAC, Plumbing Service and Installation business will provide for inside storage of materials and equipment. In addition, the home on the site will house the family of one employee. Site visits by customers would not be a part of the proposed business at this time. Parking for employees can be accommodated within the drive area immediately to the south of the shop building. TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic generation from this project was analyzed to determine impacts to the level of service to Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road intersection. Mini-storage development does not generate very much traffic. Based upon the data assembled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, it would be realistic to anticipate an average daily trip count from this site of 22. One trip is in each direction - coming and again going out. 22 trips per day equates to the addition of two additional single residences on this property. At the Wildfire Road and Dry Gulch Road intersection, this project will increase the average daily traffic entering and exiting by about 5% (assuming build out of Vista Ridge, The Neighborhood and existing single family homes on Wildfire Road). SUBDIVISION PLAT A minor subdivision plat is being processed with this revised development plan to divide the site into two lots. It also adds utility easements along all the lot lines. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 63/7-M , ~5~UÂ·L) L- Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P.L.S. President cc: Karl & Pam Ertl, Steve Murphree Page 3 of 3 1 Â£ IN C C ESTES VALLEY A* DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION -Submittal Date: 9 42-5 kl- Type of Application- ----- 9 Development Plan F' Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map F'*~ Special Review F ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map i "* Street Name Change '~~ Final Map i Rezoning Petition 7 Preliminary Subdivision Plat r" Time Extension 2 ' Supplemental Map O Final Subdivision Plat r' Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat : Amended Plat General Information Project Name Development Plan of Wildfire Subdivision Project Description Self Storage, Mechanical Contractor office, Warehouse & Employee housing Project Address 1775 Wildfire Road Legal Description North End Storage Addition Parcel ID # 2520000008 Section 20 Township 5N Range 72W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 2.138 Existing Land Use Self Storage & Manager's Housing Proposed Land Use Self Storage, Mechanical Contractor Office, Warehouse & Employee Housing I. I. - V- Existing Water Service M Town f Well j Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 9 Town , Well i Other (Specify) EPSD 9 UTSD r Septic Existing Sanitary Sewer Service Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service 7 EPSD 9 UTSD Septic Is a sewer lift station required? i Yes W No Existing Gas Service 9 Xcel i'"' Other i None Existing Zoning CH-Commercial Heavy Proposed Zoning Same Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? i Yes , No '~ No Has site staking been completed? i Yes Primary Contact information Name of Primary Contact Person Paul Kochevar Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, CO 80517 Attachments >~ Application fee * Statement of intent * 3 copies Aided) of plat or plan * 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Â¥ Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. lilli II///11!!! C j Ull Primary Contact Person is r Owner r. Applicant ; Consultant/Engineer Reco,d Owne,(s) Ron?!d J. Gordon m -- ~ Mailing Address 3340 S. Rockwood Lane, Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone 970=686=0370 ~ Â· . Cell Phone mill Fax - Email ~|~ Applicant Longs Peak Development, LLC 111111111.. Mailing Address P.O. Box 2945, Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Cell Phone _ __ . Phone 970-586-8770 illuu Fax 970-586-8770 ConsuitanvEnginear 24:pe Patk Guivoyvio & Engineer,3.179. Email m||||| Mailing Address P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park CO 80517 Phone 970-586-5175 Ceii Phone billi 1 Fax 970-586-5816 Email PAUL0971 a.!UNOJZQM APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnetcom/ComDev/Scheduies&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule. pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001,-HousJ Bill 01-10813 beoame eMecii,i,2hth, legistdti,;6 requires applicaam?or Development Plans, Special Reviews. Rezoning. Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plots if creating a new lot and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed This norce must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.6-103 CRS have been met Names: Record Ow PLAASE PR/NT: ~tg>â€¢u,4 c.{:> (~c>-Ae, Â¢NÂ« Applicant PLEAssp.RM: Sraps-LAN ~.efrfiesm:r KARL g. ERIC FAmaA 3. EgrL matures: /....-7 /-~A _ Record Owner ~7632/545(milic.5*64Â£ Date 7 -20- 07 Applicant 2*79Â»~-,4.m*Â« Date 9 1-0 -07 1 , 1 77/ 1//.i .'Ii'' 1 A- 1 ./9 ./ i ./ ...- Al - .1- C . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION * I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application lam acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. DÂ· In submiHing lhÂ® application materials and signing this application agreement; 1 atknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). â€¢ i ackewledge that i have obtained or trave access to the EVDC, ard bial prior to filing u'lis application, i have had Ule opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on me application. (The Estes Valley Development Code Is available online at www.asteinetcoiRCorriDGWD,WCoda l I understand that aoceptance of mis application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of trie Hoolication fee > by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the FVDC K ! under=tand that this proposal fnay be delayed in processirtg by a month or rrlore if the infof,nattor! provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. * I understand that a resubmittal fee wilt be charged if my application is incomplete. * The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date ort which the application is ~ 649Lul i i m /GU LW Wi VW/ 1 V#*94- * I grant peffnission for Town of Estes Park Empioyees and Planning Commissioners with proper identmcation aciess b~ my property during the review of this application. I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to â€¢ meet the deadlines shown on satd schedule shall result tri my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null ~ and void. .lor/lac- 6. 4-- . ~ - 9 .- 1 Record Owner PLEASEPFUNT- ke#,9,-o bo,aâ‚¬)04 Applicant p[EASE PRINT.* RePUFC Mvep,712<FeE- /61/t/42. ERTL- Bnela J. 6Â£TL | Signatures: 40 -Â£ A - 69 â€ž * 4.8 --, 9 Record Owner /~EL-rÂ¥ Date 7 - oÂ£v v , Applicant Date , 9 - 20 -0 7 Uutik4 -U:2 7 770 nn: grwl :]te: nic ;:;3*r , C ,#887 '17 'UJW t A F 0 t:Et:Et:C:tz 10 00 1-0 kA 10 ID LO OC\10-000 000000000022220000000$000000 6000000000000=!Ozooo NO00000000000 =20 4000 %54#44 a.%~%0-0. a 8 1 aw 1 88 8 0 8 m 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 2 0 0 O.LU<LULLI (D -Fjoly-ZM-Tly m co (6 Z H H H 0-0-0-0-0-0- 0- E3~1(1)(1) % (D ER**glr O~ g CO (00'C\14-0 m CO g N 0 00 1- Tr- 9- 1-1 -0-OW IgNEÂ¥***22* *g emOOMammoods Co~ 202*loooOEBOOISO 4 0- bo 00 0- 0- 0- 0- 00 00 0- 0.- O- O 9 JC <J 2 88 C . 2 12 g v (4 N 2 28 2 ifilifig@al cul wn-0-2 v e Â®O(DE-Ed:g@ g I 1.1.1 0 0 Co . e C .. Ji m .. 0 . M 5 7228 4 5/ M Z.Â§ 8 - @ 0 11 13 06.31-LULULUmma-<DISNIM>co rossroads Ministry of Estes Park, Inc. 80517 ougherty e Lane 0517 Estes Park, 0517 es Park Com munity Resource Center 0517 0517 0517 517 pple Lane 517 pie Lane , 517 517 Box 2 86 Estes Park, 0517 oyette & Sandra Williams 995 Dry Gulch Road Estes Park, er, Trustee :miLE 869 Crabapple Lane ge Homeowners' Assoc. c/o Rita Kurelja PO Box 1200 Â¥80-90 da Pes!Aehl e581019 Pue41Â·ION Owner Owner 11 - - Jili 3 _ h E Â£ 1 ~ilill'.101 1 iia;till litillitillililitill i ill; m im i i i : i : 1 5// i litud witillimil 81!11&*141::21:&!i 2 4 11% 11 1% 1 1 I i i 1 1 : i i 11 1 -I- 6 , a :. m,; 1â€¢ .1"0 - ' 1 il III 1, *#. I+, + .....4. - 1 74)A, (3@ e A Â® i i i#â€¢t 1 11,"'b ili _ - +,+L 7,4 : 1 11: :i 1.1 /4 44 / .th,gui % fÂ®a% /0 It i.-1 ~ 'i tb./ :12 Z j M Â® i Â·'i N 0.1 6 2 / / # h /-' 1 1,#- , - , .44 9/f 30 % 113 1 ~ Â·,0 fl , k ~ j~ i j ~-.tso WH I *6 4 Pif .1 kil N el) 04 1 1 f 00 4 (9\ ..1 1 ~ ~ Bil 'k:;1 IL)1 3 k -11 1 J I n; i J KIJ 'K Â· -1, mj 1- I ff ~1*9 ,L iiI- - i & 4 :Â· W :82, 7 Â·":~- h C M Â·u f L - : 1 21â€¢; * ..3 - 1- 1 *4 F ' -,0. 414 -,al M : -rÂ·,m ki â€¢ .. . , 4 :1/9 1, l L 4 114,1 4, - 11*1 443:U, 6 Â® 141,79- 24 1 ... -- 1. -t x , 1 1----t--441 :; If ,-11/ 1/1 @3 8 4 /' 5 T ' 0 1 . 4.\i/ Cri i . 41> I. b ' LN} 1' F 1 1; '..1 ....0. U #85 6 11% f it 1% 544-1.-7 4 i --. -- *ee ED rij i: "10. I I fri 0 - 1--h - ::1 1 ! 1 / 1 1 1E 44. 4 --4 4 3.1 -6 42': & f. )4) 1 /1// i -ay 1 i u. ti Â· J 4# , a @@1 li ~ j'/18: i - 111 N.2 1 ..moo , 1 1 i ' 04& 1 A b c Â· 1 11 1 .37! f .:11 9 Il 341 01 10]rent 32 -d SliS) 30 NAAÂ£4 3111 *0 30-11d0 al.10 A- eBe,o,s pug .poN RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 9 October 18, 2005 13. MUTCD stop signs and street identification signs shall be installed at each inter- section with Wohderview Avenue, and a street name identification sign shall be installed where the eastern spur intersects with the traffic circle. The eastern spur of Willowstone Drive shall be renamed 'Willowstone Court." An address sign shall be posted at the drive to the private off-site dwelling unit, and that address shall be changed to a "Willowstone Drive" address. 14. Willowstone Drive requires a four-inch base with three inches of asphalt. 15.Willowstone Drive shall be widened from eighteen feet to twenty feet. 16. Sidewalks shall be built from the east Willowstone Drive east to the driveway that serves 377 MacGregor Avenue and along the south side of Willowstone Drive, beginning at the driveway just east of Unit 12, extending westerly to the open area, then southerly to the property line _ - 17. Sanitary sewer service shall be shown for Unit 12. 18. Compliance with the memo from Estes Park Sanitation District to Dave Shirk dated October 12, 2005. Any necessary changes to the development plan shall be subject to staff review and approval, with any appeals being made to the Planning Commission. 8. REZONING REQUEST and DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05-08, NORTHEND STORAGE, Tract 1, Hillery Parrack Exemption, 1775 Wildfire Road, Applicant: Longs Peak Development, LLC Director Joseph reviewed the staff report, stating this is a request for rezoning from CO-Commercial Outlying to CH-Commercial Heavy zoning to allow the construction of eighty "mini-storage" units. He noted there is a procedural provision in the Estes Valley Development Code for the pairing of a specific development proposal with a rezoning request based on identifying changes in the neighborhood that would support the need for a rezoning request. He stated the surrounding neighborhood has changed significantly since the implementation of the Future Land Use Plan in 2000, including development of the Good Samaritan campus, Talon's Pointe, Vista Ridge, and the recent approval of The Neighborhood Subdivision and the Salud Clinic. There will be over 280 residential units in the area at full build-out; many are multi-family units with little storage. Additionally, the property immediately to the west was recently rezoned to CH-Commercial Heavy zoning. It is the planning staff's opinion that the development plan addresses a need that has arisen due to the changes in the area, and the rezoning provides an opportunity to impose restrictions on the use of the property, the hours of operation, the building design, and the exterior lighting. The current CO zoning of the property provides a long list of uses by right, many of which would entail higher noise and traffic levels than will be associated with mini-storage units. If the proposed rezoning is approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the developer will have one year to obtain a building permit. If a building permit is not obtained within that time frame, it is the perogative of the County Commissioners to rezone the property to whatever zoning they perceive is most appropriate. Director Joseph noted this property may be annexed to the Town of Estes Park in the future. The applicant proposes to retain the buildings currently on the property, including a manager's quarters, which is allowed in the CH zoning district as an accessory use. The proposed development plan meets the required setbacks and the impervious coverage limit, with 62.3% impervious coverage proposed and a maximum of 80% allowed. The total proposed floor area of the storage units is 22,700 square feet. The floor area ratio is proposed to be .24, while .50 is allowed in the CH district. The proposal mitigates undesirable aesthetic impacts through the use of very dense plantings around the perimeter of the development, which will eventually provide a solid screen of trees and shrubs. Per the 1996 Estes Valley Plan, staff also RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 10 October 18, 2005 recommends that all metal portions of the proposed buildings be a matte finish and all walls visible from off-site be constructed of wood, stone, or faux stone. The proposed buildings will not have any lighting, nor is additional security lighting proposed. The light on the existing building will be required to comply with the exterior lighting standards of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC), and must be shielded and downcast. Staff recommends that the hours of operation be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., and that no additional exterior lighting be allowed. A traffic impact analysis was submitted with the proposal. It is based on typical use statistics for mini-storage units of this type and indicates an average of twenty-two trips per day and two trips per peak hour for this developoment. A typical single- family dwelling generates ten trips per day. The applicant proposes to extend the paved portion of Wildfire Road to the entrance of the development. The existing house will utilize the Upper Thompson Sanitation District; no sanitary sewer service is proposed for the new buildings. Similarly, the existing house will continue to utilize the on-site well; the new buildings will not have water service. The submitted ISO calculations indicate there is adequate fire flow available from existing hydrants. If all recommened conditions of approval are met, the development plan will comply with all applicable standards set forth in the EVDC and will be consistent with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. The application was submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from the Estes Park Public Works Department, Chief Building Official Birchfield, Town Attorney White, and Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Numerous letters of opposition were received from residents of the adjacent Vista Ridge development sighting concerns about the potential for negative impact on property values, changes in the nature of the area, traffic impacts, the potential for storage of hazardous substances, noise, setting a precedent for future commercial expansion, opposition to the proposed rezoning and potential future use of the property, and general opposition. These letters were received from Jean Michael, 866 Crabapple Lane; Karla Van Drie, 869 Crabapple Lane; Michael and Deborah McNeill, 872 Crabapple Lane; Elaine Hunt-Downey, 874 Crabapple Lane; Debbie Richardson, 879 Crabapple Lane; and Susan Jackson, 889 Crabapple Lane. Chair Kitchen questioned whether outside storage would be allowed, such as motorhomes or boats. Director Joseph noted the necessity to clarify that point, stating his belief that the applicant had not proposed any outside storage. Commissioner Hix left the meeting at 3:05 p.m. due to a prior appointment that could not be rescheduled. Public Comment: Paul Kochevar of Estes Park Surveyors was present to represent the applicant. He stated the applicant has reviewed the staff's recommended conditions of approval and agrees to them. He reiterated that there could be a much more intense use of the property in comparison to the anticipated trip generation, the number of people on the site, and so forth, noting this is a very low-impact use. He stated the proposed development plan locates all structures as far from the property lines as possible, as much as forty to fifty feet. The proposed trees are located outside the fencing except on the west side of the property, where a fence already exists. He stated town water will be used for irrigation, and therefore the developer will apply for annexation. Discussion followed among the Commissioners, the staff, and Mr. Kochevar regarding protecting the trees from the wildlife and the proposed colors of the buildings and roofing materials. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 11 October 18, 2005 It was moved and seconded (Eisenlauer/Pohl) to recommend approval of the Rezoning Request, Northend Storage, Tract 1, Hillery Parrack Exemption, from CO-Commercial Out/ying to CH-Commercia/ Heavy zoning to the Board of County Commissioners, and to approve Development Plan 05-08, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed uanimously with two absent and one vacancy. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR REZONING FROM CO TO CH: 1. Approval of and compliance with Development Plan 05-08. 2. Use shall be limited to the approved development plan for the North End Storage (Development Plan 05-08). Any change in land use shall require approval of the Governing Body. 3. The applicant shall file for annexation to the Town of Estes Park within three months of approval of the rezoning and development plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05-08: 1. Approval of the rezoning of Tract 1, Hillery Parrack Exemption from "CO" commercial to "CH" commercial. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 3. No additional exterior lighting shall be allowed. 4. The light on the existing building shall be retrofitted to comply with Section 7.9 prior to issuance of a building permit for the new structures. 5. All metal portions of the buildings shall be a matte finish to minimize reflection of light. 6. All freestanding walls or retaining walls visible from off site shall be constructed of wood, stone, or faux stone. 7. Copies of applicable state and federal permits shall be submitted with the first building permit application. 8. The area of tree protection fencing shall be clearly delineated on the develop- ment plan. 9. A drainage easement between Lots 18 and 19 of the Neighborhood subdivision shall be recorded prior to any site work. 10. Details of the swale design between Lots 18 and 19 shall comply with the Best Management Practices set forth in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual and shall be submitted for review and approval prior to any site work. 11. Compliance with the memo from Public Works to Dave Shirk dated September 23,2005. 12. Compliance with the memo from Will Birchfield to Dave Shirk dated September 21,2005. 13. No outside storage shall be allowed. 9. REPORTS Director Joseph stated all items recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and heard by the Board of County Commissioners on Monday, October 17, 2005 had been approved. He also stated two applications for the current Estes Valley Planning Commission vacancy had been received. The Board of County Commisioners will interview the two applicants and request that the Planning Commision Chair be present for the interviews. Planner Chilcott stated The Neighborhood Subdivision final plat and The Links of Estes Park preliminary condominium map had been approved by the Town Board of Trustees. Discussion about the date of the December Planning Commission meeting followed. The meeting may be moved from December 20,2005 to December 13, 2005 due to the Christmas holiday, depending on the number of applications received for the December meeting. DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION 11' GOOD SAMARITAN SUB. /~ (ALSO KNOWN AS NORTH END STORAGE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN) . - 1 LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4-OF SEC-TION__20_ T5N, R72W OF THE 6TH P.M., 1 1 /<29=m TRACT B TALONS POINTE / LOT 14 ~ ~-SITE \ 4 ? 3600 t ~< 883 AR - 25' HOUSING HOUSE EXISTING - 1 X6 CEDAR FENCE @ 72" HEIGHT 6 SPACES ERTIFICATE OF ; ~ WILL NEED TO ERTY. TRACT 2 4 RUCT ANY OF THE HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION ~ H LOT LINES. (NYTES PROPERTY n CH ZONING â„¢ LL TIMES. C) ALL Lij DS OF THE ;E. LO CTURES. 0 b 0 Z IE URBAN STORM CT TO THE WATER VG DEPARTMENT. ISTRIAN PINE) r - #5 CONTAINER) 7 --22-40 ~ WOOD FENCE ~ 000< TAPEREDGE-OFERETIG-GRAVE-ROAD 0 15:1 TAPI N 89'4230" W 6133.99' CENTERLINE OF R.O.W. TAPER EDGE OF EXISTINA GRAVEL ROAD @ 15:1 /,APE# ;TRICT CENTERLINE - R = 1000.00' L = 296.71' D = 17'00'00" C = N81'17'30"W 295.62' -------t------- 70) 586-8770 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NOR1 COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIB ERS, INC. 2007 LOT 1 AND LOT 2, WILDFIRE SUBDIVISI ~ERS, INC. OWNERS CERTIFICATE BANK BLDG. THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING THE OWNER 01 SUITE 204 PROVISIONS OF THE ESTES VALLEY DEVEL ) 586-5175 DA LONGS PEAK DEVELOPMENT LLC r: < DEV. LLC KARL R. ERTL PAA 945 , CO 80517 FI 1-LL/1' 11LLy JUL)111 V 10 1 UlN 4 ~ REV: (970) 586-8770 APPROVAL DATE: 111 (NFEET) CHAIRMAN OF ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION 1 inch = 20 t DEVELOPMENT PLAN A ~ SHEET: 1 OF: 2 PROJECT NO: 1019 ... V . A- V. A . e ..... AD. I .. D . 1= .. I . 1. .. . I . .6 . B . 0 1 . .D - ..1 - . . . 2 0 4.4111 .. ..... .. . I . . I .... .......... .. , .lEe ..14. -60 4.4 40 .S . 0.40 0 V *AS :AS- rliIl~~Allih I .4,90* .ilill *49 . V..2 27:Rea 4. . .6/4 4/90"8/4/ 07'll:,Lial . 4.. 4. 'h, . 4 t-: 4*~ ~ 1 ..40. 4*. r ..20 . '4611%54:2*:: I 0 1. .. ... 4 - 1 A l . 0 0.1 2 . I : 1 ; 0 7 . 1 01* : I D- . 1 ...1 ... ... . . 01 -. . 1 - ... . I. , ... . . 0 . /1, , I .... . 0 0 - - - 1 0 0 - - - 1 1 . 0 I . .... : .. 1 0 , 0 - I : I. 1 1 0 ... - . - ..... I . 1 1. - ... Z . 1- . -. . .... 2, 0- ..... 1 . 0 0 .. + Â® 1, : 1 ... - 0 : 1 1.- I. : 1 . 0 = .: Iiâ‚¬ = . 0.-I /. = 1 0.-I : 0 . .. . ... , 0 .= 010'. : I : I .. .... 0. . 0 . 11. Â¥ i.:/0 . 4 .- 0. 1 . fAT 1 - 11 0 1.0 0 - -Â¥ I t. = I- '.- I. 1 A ... .. . 1 .... 0 , 0 . ~1* 0 0 . 1 1 . .... 0 .. I - D- -- 0 - . 11 1 :. ........ . . . D . 0 - 0 , ..li~.~ - . D . 0 -0 1 0 - . ..... 1 - 0 0 I . I 0 0 . 0 =.- ..1 - 1 0 1 . 00 - -- 0 - .. . 1- .. . - ... I ...- . ..0-- 1. 0 0 0 11 . 1. ..: . . . . . : 0 - = 1 - i ... 1 I. -.- I. 0 -Ill. D . 0 1 .... 0 - 1 -. . -. : 0 - 1 . - . . .. 1 0 : = .....0 - 0 - . D 1 1 ... . 9. . 0.-'--I'. ... 1 1 -1 - = I ... ..'',-I-' D - . 1 -0 ... . I â€¢ â€¢-Â·10 - - ./ . . . .. . 1 , 0. 1 1 . 0 .-0 -0 1 1 -Cr . . . : 1 0.1 . .. . I I - I 1 0 0 : 1 -- . -.- :.1 - 0. 0. .. I. ..: . .1 â€¢1 6, . , ... . = D : . 0 .. . . . 8. . -- : D '1.- I = = 1 ... : 0 - ..... . I. I I . . , = . 2 . .. : I . . . - - 1 Z = 1 1.- . ..... . .... 0 .- I. I.I.- ..I... I .- - ...D. I . - I .. I .... ; .1 . 11. I 1 0 0 -Ill. 1 -- = ' ' I I. .-I =1. 1- . ... . . - .. .... . I. I. : 1 I -- 1 - --Ii". . -- 1 1 .... -- - . 0- .... I . = 1 -- .. . ... 0 1 . 1 1 0. ... : 1 - I. 1 . P: . .. . I . 1 . I ; . .. 0 0 0 0 1 I . 0. . -0 11'k ~......: ... . s . ...... ... I : :i. 1 44 : 1 . 1.0 D -- - i -- =- 0 ... - I 5/TA./3.11////*/ 0 0 . -0 .... . -0 = 01 4*â‚¬5 .1 0 .1 . . 0 2 0 '. : 4. 1 ' . . ....: F ... . 0 1.'"hillill)lillillillillillillillillillv-jilimililiellieglilill . 0 .. .1 0 0 . ,. 105 . * 1 i . 40 0 - I ... 0 - ./ I . . 1 . - . . 0/ - 11 ... . -0 1... 1. 2 . .. . 11 0 .. 1. .. 1 . D . 0.~ . I=... . * 0... --al./.... 1 .: - .4 . 1 ---1- ..... 1 . 1 - . . . 1. 0 0&.-:4,4 *S,~E"i D. e A- .. .A. . 0. ... - I ... A .0 D . ,. - 0 . I -1 0 @ 0 , . I . 0 4 ' e 1 - ... . ..1 0. A ---- .. 4 : D : /0// 0 0 0 . :0 . 0 0 I. . i . . .. 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . A. - 0 1.- I .:. M ... ... â‚¬Z. D . 0 . 4 I 0 -0 -1 .... ...1 0 0 - ... . I ... . 00 4 I . .Il. I .- - 0 0 0 , 0- .: : 0 : . ..6 4 0 .....4 =. 1- .. . .. .1 ... 0 - ... . 0 . 0 ... ...... : 0 .. :. . 0 'A .. 1 0 - 0 1. 1 .. . A . A D -3 , 10 - ... : . 1: A . 0 ''' 11 ..:. I 0 ... .. . .A . --- I .. . a .A DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF WILDFIRE SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 20, T5N, R72* OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 0 EAVE 111111111111 111111111111 1111111 lllllll 1111111 IllillI 1111111 1111111 lillill 1111111 lillilllilli - HEIGHT *S SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IS ALL STEEL FRAME. LOWER PANELS ARE 1/8" = 1'-0" HORIZONTAL AND UPPER 2/3 OF WALLS ARE VERTICAL PANELS. THE HORIZONTAL SECTIONS ARE A MEDIUM TAUPE COLOR WHICH IS A DARKER COLOR THAN THE VERTICAL SECTIONS. THE VERTICAL SECTIONS AND ROOF ARE A LIGHT, MATTE, TAN COLOR. DOORS ARE A MEDIUM GREEN. 15' , 25' , 30' , 25' , ' DRIVE ' ' DRIVE ' 12 EAVE HEIGHT 1 1 12" END ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" 4'-0" 1 2,-0" 1 4,-0" 96" +/- . .1. .1- 1 . . 9" DIA. RIPRAP ON FILTER FABRIC 3" TO 5" THICK NATIVE, PLACE 2" LAYER OF TOPSOIL AND SOW WITH NATIVE GRASS SEED SANDSTONE SLAB S WALE " A" 1/2" = 1'-0" SAND BLASTED, BLACK, 8" LETTER NORTHEND 1 1 + 1 2'-0" 1 4'-0" . .1. .-14 .- . uâ€¢~tÂ®[E~10~ STORAGE -cll 1-1112rn'.L ..., ~~TIE=11121Â»-- N NATIVE GRASS SEED ON PREPARED SWALE OF EXISTING GRADE f 6" TOP SOIL DEPTH OVER FILTER FABRIC S WALE "B" 1/2" = 1'-0" SIGN DETAIL 3/4" = 1'-0" CONC. CURB/GUTTER ALONG NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHWEST BUILDING AND EXTENDING TO 2' MIN. GRAVEL SHOULDER SURFACING 18" 6" THE EAST TO AN AREA DRAIN ALONG PERIMETER OF ASPHALT 3" ASPHALT OVER VARIES -- SL_- 0|1-1/Â« r.--T--------- ---- CROSS SLOPE VARIES 1 24" DRIVE SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0" 11' @ 2% 11' 0 2% . 4 6' @ 5% R' - ROADRIDF SWAI F . 6' a 5% .. . . SOUTH SIDE SURFACING NORTH SIDE 3Â» ASPHALT OVER 4" GRAVEL BASE Â© ESTES PARK SURVEYORS dc ENGINEERS, INC. 2007 GRAVEL SHOULDER -r--- - GRAVEL SHOULDER ~-r-rrrTT-fl-TTEEIIIIII-L l l 1* 1- 1-- - 1.11 / 1 i Ill lilll / 1 / I I l l LI (TT-TTITTI//1 li ilillil i- l l TII1- 11/ 1 i - l 1 1 /1/FO'b.In~ D-- ESTES PARK SURVEYORS dc ENGINEERS, INC. / P.O. BOX 3047 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BLDG. - ESTES PARK, COLORADO SUITE 204 - //0 471 --- ~12" -- -4..1 80517 (970) 586-5175 - -,/ --1--/ WILDFIRE ROAD SECTION PROJECT: WILDFIRE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY: PMK CHECKED BY: DATE: APRIL 25, 2007 LONGS PEAK DEV. LLC REV: MAY 31, 2007 P.O. BOX 2945 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REV: ESTES PARK, CO 80517 REV: (970) 586-8770 BUILDING ELEVATION, DETAILS SHEET: 2 OF: 2 PROJECT NO: 1019 PROPERTY LINE 15' SETBACK b 7 ~ Amendments to the Estes Valley ~ Development Code, Block Nine ~ Estes Park Community Development Department *i==0 Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: June 19, 2007 .NP TITLE: Amendments to the Estes Valley 1.- FÂ¢V"' i Development Code, Block Nine .4 e USFS ***I REQUEST: To make a number of changes F.- 36 and corrections to the adopted Estes Valley Rx:ky M)'././ USFS Development Code. Fhâ€¢, - 14*ional Il Ill LOCATION: Estes Valley, inclusive of the - lJSFS Town of Estes Park. RIVNP . 80â€¢,dary U~ APPLICANT: Estes Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: These Code revisions address the following: 1) Section 7.1 "Slope Protection Standards" 2) Section 7.2 "Grading and Site Disturbance" 3) Section 7.11 "Off-Street Parking and Loading" 4) Section 10.4.A2 5) Appendix D "General Site Access" ORGANIZATION: 1. Text to be replaced delineated with strikethrough (abc do fghi jk Imn op qrstuv w 2. New text delineated with underline (abc de fqhi ik Imn op qrstuv w xvz). 3. Revisions have been organized sequentially by chapter and section. r L ITEM 1: Â§ 4.3.C.5 TABLE 4-2: BASE DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Table 4-2 Base Density and Dimensional Standards Residential Zoning Districts Minimum ~~W~: Minimum Lot Building/Structure Setbacks Max. Min. Standards [l] ill [2] [4] [91 Building Building Max. Net Zo#88 Density Area (sq Width Side Rear Height Width â‚¬04*14*ge District (units/acre) ft) (ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) [10] (ft.) RE-1 1/10 Ac. 10 Ac. 200 50 50 50 30 20 RE 1/2.5 Ac. 2.5 Ac. 200 50 50 50 30 20 E-1 1 1 Ac. [3] 100 25 25 25 30 20 25-arterials: E 2 1/z Ac. [3] 75 15-other 10 15 30 20 streets 25 -arterials; R 4 1/4 Ac. 60 15-other 10 15 30 20 streets R-1 8 5,000 50 15 10 15 30 20 6 Single- family = 25-arterials; R-2 4 18.000; 60 15-other 10 10 30 20 504 Duplex= streets 27.000 40,000, 5.400 sq. Residential ft./unit 60; Uses: [4] 4.Al [8] Lots Max = 8 and Senior Greater 25-arterials: RM Min = 3 10 Ord. 18- Instituti than 15-other 10 30 20 [7] 01#14) Senior 16] Institutional onal 100,000 streets 54** sq. ft.: Living Uses: Living 200 Max = 24 Uses: 1/2 Ac. Notes to Table 4-2: [5] Multi tamily de:'elopment, All deielopinent. eAcept derel<ipment of one single-family dwelling on a single lot. shall also be subject to a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of .30 and a maximum lot coverage of 509. 14 ITEM 2: Â§ 7.1 SLOPE PROTECTION STANDARDS B. Development Restrictions on Steep Slopes. 1. Applicability. These development restrictions shall apply to all new development in the Estes Valley, oxcept for development on lots that wcro approved for single-family residential uce prior to the effective date of this Gede. (Ord. 18-02 #1) Development on lots that were approved for single- family use prior to the effective date of this Code see also Section 7.7 "Geologic and Wildfire Hazard Areas." 2. New Structures-Existing Slopes in Excess of :Chiny Twenty Percent. a. New development proposed to be built on any portion of a site containing a slope of thifty twenty percent (30 20%) or greater shall be subject to Staff review and approval of a development plan pursuant to Â§3.8 of this Code. This provision applies to development that would otherwise be exempt from the development plan review process (o.g., single-family developments containing less than throo [3] units). b. Staff shall review all such development plans and evaluate them according to the following standards: (1) Site disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable (see Â§7.2.D, "Limitations on Site Disturbance" below); (2) Cuts for utilities and access driveways shall be shared to the maximum extent feasible; (3) To the maximum extent feasible, new construction shall not take place on any portion of a parcel that shows evidence of slope instability, landslides, avalanche, flooding or other natural or manmade hazards (see Â§7.7, "Geologic and Wildfire Hazard Areas" below); (4) The Applicant shall demonstrate that the slope's ground surface and subsurface are not unstable, that the proposed development will not cause instability or increase the potential for slope failure, and that the development of the slope will not increase the degree of hazard both on-site and on adjacent properties. c. For purposes of this subsection, steepness of slope shall be measured from the points with highest and lowest elevation within five (5) feet of any portion of the proposed structure. 3. Structure Clearance from Steep Slopes. Structure clearance from ascending or descending slopes greater than thifty twenty percent (30 2Q56) shall comply with the requirements set forth in the applicable Building Code provisions. 4. Grading, Clearing and Excavation-Slopes in Excess of *#Fty Twenty Percent. Clearing, excavation and grading on slopes greater than thiFty twenty percent (39 2Q%) would not be allowed, unless expressly approved through a development plan. 5. Roads/Driveways-Slopes in Excess of *#My Twenty Percent. Shared driveways and access to sites or lots containing slopes in excess of thifty .4 . twenty percent (30 20%) shall be utilized to the maximum extent feasible. See also "General Site Access" and "Intersection and Driveway Visibility" in Appendix D. (Ord. 8-05 #1) ITEM 3: Â§ 7.2 GRADING AND SITE DISTURBANCE STANDARDS A. Applicability. 1=These grading and site disturbance standards shall apply to all new development in the Estes Valley, except for single-family residential development on a lot created and approved for such use prior to tho offoctivo date of this Codo. (Ord. 18-02 #1; Ord. 8-05 #1) 2. These standards shall not prevent single-family residential development on a lot created and approved for such use prior to the effective date of this Code, but mav restrict building location and associated drivewavs to a location that results in the highest degree of compliance with these standards, thereby minimizing site disturbance. ITEM 4: Â§ 7.11 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING F. Location. 1. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Section, required off-street parking spaces shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the principal use. (See Off-Street Parking Alternatives, Â§7.11.G below.) 2. In all nonresidential zoning districts except the CH district, off-street parking shall not be located within the required front yard setback area. In the CD district, off-street parking shall also not be located between the lot line and the building line parallel to an arterial or collector street. See also Â§4.4.D.3, "Vehicular Access and Circulation Requirements." 3. All off-street parking areas shall be separated from arterial street property lines by a landscaped buffer area at least twenty-five (25) feet wide, and from other street property lines by a landscaped buffer area at least fifteen (15) feet wide. See Â§7.5.F, "Buffering and Screening," and Figure 7-9 above. 4. See Â§7.6.F for required parking areas setbacks from delineated river/stream corridors and wetlands. 5. Parking for single-family and two-family dwellings may be located in residential driveways (excluding RV's and boats). 6. Guest Parking. Driveways may not be counted toward the quest parking requirements. Guest parking shall be located to provide convenient access. For example, each driveway serving multiple units should have quest parking. f,W ITEM 5: Â§7.11.0.5 BASINS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES Basins and Drainage Facilities. A\\ basin and drainage facilities shall comply with the Larimer County Stormwater Control Manual, as amended, and the standard drawings and specifications contained or referenced therein. ITEM 6: Â§ 10.4.A2 2. Lot width shall comply with standards set forth in Tables 4-2 and 4-5. Flaqpole lots shall complv with Section 10.4AC, and shall be no less than thirty (30) feet at the front lot line or seventy-five (75) feet at the building line, or such greater width as may be required by this Code. ITEM 7: Â§ 10.5.H. CONDOMINIUMS, TOWNHOUSES AND OTHER FORMS OF AIRSPACE OWNERSHIP, 3. EXEMPTIONS Exemptions. This subsection shall not apply to condominium projocts of two (2) units or locs. The number of units shall includo any units roccrvod for future development. ITEM 8: Appendix D.I.A. STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION Standards of construction not otherwise specified hereunder shall be according to the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction of the Colorado Department of Highways (latest edition, with amendments in effect at that time), Town of Estes Park Right-of-Way Permit Construction Guidelines, Larimer County Access Policy, Larimer County Urban Street Standards and Larimer County Road Standards, as amended. Quality control testing shall meet the minimums as described in "Other Standards." . ITEM 9: Appendix D.111. GENERAL SITE ACCESS B. Driveway Access - General Standards. 1. Safe Access Required. Safe, convenient and adequate access to individual buildings by driveways shall be provided. Driveway access to collector and arterial streets shall be discouraged. No driveway shall be so located as to create a hazard to pedestrians or motorists, *te invite or compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements, or potentially block or alter access to adioining properties or uses. To the maximum extent feasible, new driveways shall align directly across from existing driveways. (Ord. 8-05 #1) 9. Driveway Design Requirements. (Ord. 8-05 #1) a. All driveways serving eight (8) or more parking spaces shall be paved and constructed with a minimum edge radius of five (5) feet on both sides, and shall be surfaced with at least two (2) inches of bituminous paving material or four (4) inches of concrete. (Ord. 8-05 #1) b. All driveways serving twenty (20) or more parking spaces shall be paved and designed and constructed meeting the standards applicable to a public street. (Ord. 8-05 #1) Â£ Where qarages are used to satisfy parking requirements, the driveway apron shall be at least twenty feet in length unless it is demonstrated the design will not interfere with adioining traffic movements. Or... Driveway aprons shall be at least twenty feet in length unless it is demonstrated the design will not interfere with adioining traffic movements.