The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2007-04-17= F. c LE C 0 {33 = 'b 1 i Prepared: April 11,2007 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:30 p.m. Meeting, Board Room, Town Hall Study Session: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:00 p.m. Study Session, Rooms 201 and 202 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated March 20,2007 b. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-03 & PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, LAKE ESTES VILLAGE, Lot 1, Lake Estes Addition; Lot 1, Lake Estes Second Addition; Lot 2, Amended Plat of Lot 1 & Lot 2, Canaiy Subdivision; Lot 3A, 2nd Amended Plat of Lot 3, Canaiy Subdivision, and a Portion of Lot 51, Grand Estates Subdivision- Applications withdrawn by Applicant c. RELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, GRUEFF-EDWARDS SUBDIVISION, Lot 4, Stanley Historic District, north and east of Upper Stanley Village Shopping Center, Lot4ED, LLC/Applicant-Request to continue to May 15, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting d. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, KEARNEY SUBDIVISION, Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition, 1360 Brook Drive, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant-Request to continue to May 15, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting e. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-01, KEARNEY MINI STORAGE, Proposed Lot 2, Kearney Subdivision, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant-Request to continue to May 15, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting f. SPECIAL REVIEW 07-01, FUN CITY, Lot lA, Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Lee & Alps Addition and Lot 9A & Outlot A of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A & 9A, Prospect Village Subdivision, 375 Moraine Avenue Applicant: Slides, Inc. DBA Fun City Request: Request to add bungee trampoline jumping and a rock climbing wall to existing uses Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott g. SPECIAL REVIEW 07-02, HORSE-DRAWN CARRIAGE CONCESSION, Downtown Estes Park Applicant: Hearts & Tails Carriage Co. Request: Provide horse-drawn carriage rides in the downtown area Staff Contact: Dave Shirk d. AMENDED PLAT, Lots 27,28, & 29, Stanley Heights, 920 & 1000 West Lane Applicant: Lot4ED, LLC and D&E Stewart Trust Request: Combine three lots into two Staff Contact: Dave Shirk Continued on reverse - 1 - 2. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments are not to exceed 3 minutes. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-05, PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Metes and Bounds, Park School District campus bounded by Brodie Avenue, Fish Creek Road (Cty Rd 63), Manford Avenue, & Community Drive Applicant: Park School District R-3 Request: Redevelopment and expansion of school facilities Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 07-06, PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT OBSERVATORY, Metes and Bounds, 1600 Manford Avenue Applicant: Angels Above Foundation / Park School District R-3 Request: Construct an observatory Staff Contact: Alison Chilcott 5. REPORTS 6. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Estes Valley Planning Commission The next scheduled meeting will be held Tuesday, May 15, 2007. There are currently eleven items on the agenda. You can view information about all current submittals, including next month's Planning Commission items, on our web page: www. estesnet.com/comdev/Cu rrentReq uests. aspx - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 and ~ Preliminary Condominium Map --.-., Town Hall, 170 MaeGregor Avenue ~~....d PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 17,2007 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TITLE: "Lake Estes Village 1650 Big Thompson Avenue Estes Park, Colorado" LOCATION: The site is located at 1650 / 1700 Big Thompson Avenue (current location of Lake Shore Lodge and Lake Estes Inn and Suites), within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Larry Walker for Aspen Lake Investors, i LLC / Sharon L. Seeley FP.Â»=/ 9-2--2/ 1/) 81 .U===1 Â»RJ V / CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: $-de 19 / Stewart Land Group itw ~<i~~=~P~~~~~ r,, STAFF CONTACTS: Don Tiller 19=*r APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: j~~~~1~li~~ "~ )11 Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) 11- PROJECT / 2008 ..400' Inc , ~ 1 DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: Development Plan This is a development plan application to develop 158 accommodation units in fifteen two-story buildings. The existing 55 accommodation units at Lake Shore Lodge (1700 Big Thompson Avenue) will be retained. The existing 58 accommodation units at Lake Estes Inn and Suites (1650 Big Thompson Avenue) will be demolished. A total of 213 accommodation units are proposed (new and existing) on the 15.79 acre site. Condominium Map The applicant has submitted an application to condominiumize the 213 accommodation units. There are a total of 103 condominium units. 55 of the condominium units contain a lock-out bedroom for rental purposes and full kitchens; 48 contain limited kitchen , facilities and no lock-out bedrooms. The lock-out bedrooms do not contain any kitchen facilities. The 103 condominium units will be sold into individual ownership. II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels Four Parcel Number(s) 25292-13-001,25203-41-003,25203-35-002,25292-06-001 Gross Land Area 15.79 acres, 687,722 square feet Net Land Area Same as Gross Land Area Existing Land Use Accommodation (113 units) Proposed Land Use Accommodation (213 units) SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel MAPPED HAZARDS/PHYSICAL FEATURES Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands Yes Streams/Rivers No Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat No Ridgeline Protection Area No LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING 9.144 244\4 / _ME_-1 Sl IE g ...4 - I ZONa: A ! zoist . - ZE IKEERE--1 /ISE: AC C /IM US# COMMR\,~ \ US/:SF 1*1*%=Mul 1 L â‚¬ A PUBLIC A///~/IA , -494 ,OPEN .....Ill- 4/NA - 1 *PACE ~ XÂ«ti i 44 fla Page #2 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 1 AERIAL PHOTO 4 '. 1 7 4, Ae,. i . .*:' : ' 1! â‚¬ ...& 6-4Â· , 'I# 1.. . - 4 - AERIAL PHOTO WITH CONTOURS A. h ....L 41 AC/Nt V F N 5 1, k . Â·t t. 1% *3 t , 1 4*' I / # . * 2 y .... i . f 9 > :,-41 9 . r~ 4. Â· ; 1<@GÂ·4Â·Â· Â· . . :Al. X ... . 1 , - .fic u.,0 ... .0 1 I L.,1- r. a 4 ...4 -4 1 / III. REVIEW CRITERIA The Estes Valley Planning Commission shall review development plan applications and all submitted plans and reports, and evaluate them according to the following standards: 1. The development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code; and 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement and other similar plans. Page #3 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 This application does not fall within the parameters of staff-level review, and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission. The Town Board will review the Preliminary and Final Condominium Map application. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Estes Park Department of Building Safety: See Will Birchfield's memo to Alison Chilcott dated March 26,2007. Estes Park Public Works Department: See Greg Sievers' memo to Alison Chilcott dated March 26,2007. Town Attorney: See Greg White's letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 27,2007. Fire Chief: See Scott Dorman's email to Alison Chilcott dated March 27,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District: See Reed Smedley's letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 21,2007. Estes Valley Recreation and Park District: See Stanley Gengler's letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 21,2007. Estes Park Light and Power Department and Water Department: See Jeff Boles memo to Bob Goehring dated March 20,2007 and Mike Mangelsen's memo to Bob Goehring dated March 16,2007 pertaining to the engineers cost estimate. Bureau of Reclamation: See Fred Ore letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 21,2007. Department of the Army Corp of Engineers: See Timothy Carey's letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 14, 2007 and Timothy Carey's letter to Darcy Tiglas dated December 6,2006. Colorado Department of Transportation: See Gloria Hice-Idler's email to Alison Chilcott dated March 28,2007. Larimer County Engineering Department: See Traci Downs' memorandum dated March 26,2007. Adjacent Property Owners: A significant number of letters were received from adjacent property owners expressing concern with the development application. Page #4 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 ' F V. STAFF FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. Draft architectural drawings have been submitted for the buildings. There are a total of fifteen buildings proposed, with eight different building types, and six unit types. Of the unit types, unit type A can be configured as either a one bedroom or two bedrooms. There are a total of 103 units, with 55 lock-outs. This is in addition to the existing Lake Shore Lodge which contains 55 units with a total of 102,600 square foot of floor space. Below is a summary of the building types. Note: the applicant did not label the building types, the types were added for purposes of reference. Given the plans must be updated per other deficiencies identified in this staff report, the individual buildings must be labeled on the revised development plans prior to approval. Bldg Bldg Building Configuration Floor Type #(s) Area A 1,6,9,12,14 2 A units, 1 B unit, 2 C units, 1 D unit - 6 units with 4 lock-outs 32,400 sf 2,4,8 3 A units, 1 E unit, 3 F units - 7 units with 4 lock-outs 34,200 sf C 3 4 A units, 4 F units - 8 units with 4 lock-outs 36,000 sf 5 1A unit, 1 B unit, 1 E unit, 3 F units - 6 units with 5 lock-outs 37,800 sf 7,11 4 A units, 2 C units, 1 D unit - 7 units with 3 lock-outs 28,800 sf 10 4 A units, 2 E units, 2 F units - 8 units with 4 lock-outs 36,000 sf 13 2 A units, 2 E units, 2 F units - 6 units with 4 lock-outs 32,400 sf 15 10 A units - 10 units with no lock-outs 18,000 sf Below is a summary of the unit count and types. Unit # Units # Lock- Approx. Unit Size # of Kitchen # outs Bedrooms Type floors 48 0 916 sq 1-2 Efficiency 1 6 6 1,895 sf (includes lock-out) 3 Efficiency 2 14 14 1,757 sf (includes lock-out) 3 Full 2 7 7 1,995 sf (includes lock-out) 3 Full 2 E 8 8 2,039 sf (includes lock-out) 3 Full 1 F 20 20 1,505 sf (includes lock-out) 2 Full 1 It does not appear that the floor plans meet ADA Fair Housing Colorado Chapter 9 requirements. 2. Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan Page #5 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 0 0 00 4 =Ommo W 1 The development plan is consistent with the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. The plan designates this site for accommodation use. 3. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All letters and memos submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. The phasing plans were not fully specified in the submittal. Additional comments may be provided by the reviewing agencies once the phasing information is available. A subset ofthe more substantial comments follow: Department of Building Safety has numerous active complaints regarding properties owned by these applicants performing work without obtaining the required permits and inspections. It is the policy of the Department of Building Safety to not process any submittals for properties and/or owners with unresolved complaints. To comply with the Chief Building Official's comments dated March 26, 2007 all required permits shall be obtained and all corrective actions completed and approved prior to review by the Building Safety Department and Planning Commission review of a the application. Public Works comment #2 and #6 require potentially significant revisions to the development plan. Comment #7 requires a modification to the development plan or storm drain easement, land use agreement, and recorded maintenance agreement for storm water discharge to neighboring property. Numerous other requirements for change to the development plan are included in the remaining comments. The Town Attorney has requested a Development Agreement be negotiated between the parties rather than attempting to address development issues through conditions of approval of the Development Plan given the complexity of the phasing, size of the project, the need to file an Amended Plat to revise lot lines, the need to address the use of all the units as short term accommodations, and any other concerns arising during the review of this project. Request was made to verify The Fire Chief has requested list of ISO fire flow requirements for the buildings in phase one showing the needed fire flow for each building and available fire flow that will offset the needed fire flow for each building per ISO's Fire Suppression Rating Schedule and ISO's Appendix A - Guide for Determination of Required Fire Flow. Upper Thompson Sanitation District is concerned with proximity of the storm drainage to the sewer main. There must be 5 feet of separation when the two are running parallel to each other. The storm drainage system is not shown on the utility drawings, the development plan should be modified to add the storm drainage system to the utility plans to demonstrate this separation. Page #6 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 Estes Valley Recreation and Park District has requested, based on existing storm water run-off from Lake Shore Lodge in 2006 causing flooding of facilities on the public property to the east, that the drainage, retention and slow release of storm water be much greater than the existing system. Estes Park Light and Power Department and Water Department is requesting primary feeds to transformer pads, secondary feeds to secondary pedestals, services and meter locations are added to plan set. This request is in addition to the attached agency conirnents. Bureau of Reclamation is concerned the Development Plans do not ensure protection of Lakes Estes water quality and is requiring new engineering plans detailing retention ponds adequately sized to handle expected increased storm water volumes. Given the new site design, the Bureau is requesting the perpetual easement providing Lake Shore Lodge access be relinquished. Staff will discuss this request prior to public hearing. Department of the Army Corp of Engineers is requiring a Department of Army permit prior to any work performed within the Community B wetlands setbacks. A Department of Army permit will not be required in Community A or Community C. Colorado Department of Transportation is requiring the Traffic Impact Study address the development phasing and the striping plan be resubmitted. Larimer County Engineering Department is requiring the lowest opening of any building to be at least 18 inches above the maximum elevation of the Lake Estes Reservoir Dam (7487.0 feet, per the submitted Drainage Report). The Development Plan must be modified to this standard. 4. Nonresidential Zoning District Density and Dimensional Standards The proposed principal use, i.e., accommodation use, is permitted in the Accommodations zoning district. The plan meets the density requirements. However, the density calculation on the plan set is not correctly presented. A breakdown of units by type is required. Further, the density calculation must demonstrate the density requirements are met with each of the phases. For example, since the existing motel units will not be demolished in the first phase, the density table must demonstrate the phase 1 density which includes the motel units meets the density requirement. There is one dimensional problem that was discovered. There are eight parking spaces between drive aisles between buildings 1 and 16. These spaces do not meet the code requirements. The spaces are shown as 18 feet in depth for a total of 36 feet allotted. The code requires each space to be 19.5 feet in depth for a total of 39 feet. Page #7 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 . 5. Accessory Uses and Structures A total of 90 detached garage units are proposed and are allowed as an accessory use. The proposed plan meets the structure requirements. However, stand alone accessory buildings may not exceed 1000 square feet of gross floor area (EVDC Section 5.2.D.4). The current site plan does not meet this requirement. A Board of Adjustment review will be required. Staff will recommend approval o f at this review. 6. Slope Protection, Grading and Site Disturbance Slope Protection Slope protection standards do not apply. Per a note on the development plan, this site has an average slope o f 2-5 percent. Grading The grading plan will require revision. Issues and/or requirements include: â€¢ Water quality requirements not me â€¢ Building #5 appears to have a conflict with the grading lan on the south-east wing of building â€¢ Building opening elevations do not appear to meet Larimer County Engineering Department requirements â€¢ Grades noted on the plans are not always consistent with the proposed contours. For example, a 7.9% grade is noted for the fire lane to the south of Building 10, but a 20% grade is shown per the proposed contours â€¢ Positive drainage around each building must be demonstrated on the plans â€¢ Finished floor elevations are not shown for garages â€¢ It appears that off-site grading will be required west of Building 5. If so, a temporary construction easement and off-site grading plan must be provided. I f not, please revise grading plan. â€¢ A phased drainage plan is required, demonstrating acceptable design for phase one as well as the final condition. â€¢ The design must demonstrate existing erosion around electric meters where water from Lake Estes Inn and Suites discharges onto the vacant property to the south and the erosion along the existing dirt drive that runs east/west conveying this water be mitigated. â€¢ Please note that a more detailed review o f building height compliance will be conducted at building permit submittal â€¢ The grading plan should clearly depict existing and proposed grading. The grading plan sheets C-2.0 and C-2.1 provide clear depiction. Please revise the landscape plan to the same clarity. Further review will be completed once drainage plan is revised per prior comments. Existing trees should be shown on the grading plan and grading around existing trees should be carefully planned so as not to destabilize/kill the trees. The plan should demonstrate compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code, including EVDC 7.2 Grading and Site Disturbance Standards and ENDC Appendix D.VIII Tree and Vegetation Protection standards. Page #8 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 Limits of Disturbance A limits of disturbance line indicates the areas where construction and development activity will be contained. The limits of disturbance is shown on the plan. However, the limits of disturbance encroaches into the wetlands setback buffer. This is not permitted by code and must be updated in a resubmittal. Further, as of March 29, 2007, the site has not been staked to show the limit of disturbance in relation to the wetlands setback. Staking must be completed for the application to be properly reviewed. This includes not only the wetlands setback but all other required staking as previously requested. 7. Public Trails, Sidewalk, Pathways, Bikeways Ten-foot-wide concrete sidewalk/trail construction along the Highway 34 frontage is required with this development and the proposed location with construction details should be shown on the plan. 8. Tree and Vegetation Protection The site plan retains 89 0 f the existing 105 significant trees (89%) on this site. There are a number of instances in which the grading may impact existing trees - minor modification to the grading plan in the areas of the retained trees is strongly recommended. There are a number of utility line and pavement conflicts with existing trees that will likely result in damage, destabilization, or destruction of the trees. As noted, existing trees (with species and caliper) must be shown on the grading, landscape and utility plans to assist in reviewing the development's impact. Further review will be done once the site is staked. Building #7 is requiring removal of a particularly significant tree. Please consider adjusting the location of this building to retain this tree. 9. Landscaping and Buffers The landscaping and buffer plan does meet the quantity requirements as defined by code. However there are a number of changes that will require modification of the landscape plan. â€¢ Label existing tree species and caliper on the landscape plan â€¢ The plan does not provide for adequate Species Mix as required by 7.5.D.2.c. 558 trees are specified. No deciduous trees are included in the design, with 416 trees (75%) being one species. A reasonable approach for a site with this quantity of trees is to have no more than 15% of any one species, with a mix of deciduous and conifers. Page #9 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 â€¢ Plant size specification do not meet requirements of 7.5.D.2.d. Specific to this revision of the plan 50% o f the coni fers must be eight feet in height, with all shrubs in five gallon containers. â€¢ Trees must be including in all parking landscape islands, unless there are unavoidable utlity conflicts â€¢ A number of existing and new trees are in conflict with utilities, asphalt surfaces and/or lighting. â€¢ Please consolidate the landscape notes with the standard landscape notes. â€¢ The minimum required and the proposed landscaping requirements should be included on the plan by type, e.g. street frontage buffer, district buffer, landscape islands. â€¢ Landscape Note # 3 on Sheet L-1.0 states that turf grass is proposed. This should be revised. Only those grasses listed in Appendix C are permitted. The proposed grass mix must be provided on the plan. 10. Wildlife Habitat Protection The site is not in a mapped critical wildlife habitat area. A wildlife conservation plan is not required. However, the wetlands and the surrounding setback should be viewed as a significant wildlife habitat area. Limits of disturbance must not encroach on the wetlands or the surrounding wetlands setback. Non-native vegetation is not permitted within the wetlands setback. Utilities are only allowed within this setback if it is determined there are not practical alternatives. The current plan proposes utilities within this setback. Without further justification, it appears there are practical alternatives that would avoid this encroachment. Provision of animal-proof dumpsters is required and the condominium declaration should address animal-proof dumpsters. Control of domestic animals is also required. The Municipal Code sufficiently addresses animal control. The plan should demonstrate compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code, including EVDC 7.6 Wetlands and Stream Corridor Protection. It bears repeating that the proposed tree planting and grading in the wetlands setback is not permitted. 11. Exterior Lighting Exterior lighting is minimized and staff is supportive of the proposed lighting. Please add a general lighting note to the plan that states "Light Sources shall be concealed or shielded with luminaries with cut-offs with an angel not exceeding ninety degrees to minimize the potential for glare and unnecessary diffusion on adjacent property. In no case shall exterior lighting add more than one foot-candle to illumination levels at any point off site." Building lighting will be reviewed with submittal of building permits. 12. Operational Performance Standards Page #10 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 Operational and physical compatibility includes review of trash, loading and delivery areas, lighting, and landscaping/buffering. Staff believes the proposed development plan does a good job o f addressing these standards. 13. Off-Street Parking and Loading The development plans meet off-street parking and loading requirements with two exceptions. â€¢ Code dimensional issue identified in item 1. Nonresidential Zoning District Density and Dimensional Standards. â€¢ Parking requirements appear to be incompletely specified for Lake Shore Lodge. Please update the parking requirements/provisions contained on sheet C-0.0 to separately account for the restaurant dining, restaurant kitchen, general business services, and the conference usages. Per 7.11.C, minimum parking requirements by use are as follows. Please note that per 7.11.E an estimate of parking demand may be submitted for consideration. Conference - 1 space per 133 square feet (75% of Eating/Drinking Establishment requirement) Business Services - 1 space per 400 square feet Eating/Drinking Establishment (restaurant dining) - 1 space per 100 square feet of customer service area (indoor and outdoor) o Restaurant kitchen - 1 space per 3 employees Please specify square footage assigned to each use (it would be helpful to provide floor plans). 14. Adequate Public Facilities Adequate public facility improvements are required to be installed or guaranteed prior to issuance of the first grading/building permit, and improvements are required to be installed concurrent with the impacts of the development. The phasing plans were not fully specified in the submittal. Additional comments may be provided by the reviewing agencies once the phasing information is available. Sewage Disposal The property will be served by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District (UTSD). The UTSD has expressed one concern regarding required separation of sanitary sewer main and storm water drainage mains - see referral letter. Water The property will be served by Town water. The applicant will be setting up a fire flow test and a hydraulic analysis to determine if a loop connection will be required across Highway 34 as shown on plans. Drainage/Water Quality Management Page #11 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 00 0 ,. The drainage plan and report must accurately reflect all existing improvements, e.g., the storm pipe shown to the east of Lake Shore Lodge is a 12" not 24" pipe. Storm water is proposed to drain into an existing rip rap channel at the northeast corner of the property. The channel feeds into a pipe that is not shown. The channel does not handle the current water volume and would need to be improved to handle more volume and filtration would need to be provided. The drainage plan must address phasing. How will water from Lake Estes Inn and Suites be handled during construction of Phase I? Third party inspection of drainage improvements may be required with costs paid for by the applicant. An engineer's drainage certificate on as-builts of the drainage improvements will be required. Fire Protection The Fire Chief has reviewed the ISO calculations and has requested list of ISO fire flow requirements for the buildings in phase one showing the needed fire flow for each building and available fire flow that will offset the needed fire flow for each building per ISO's Fire Suppression Rating Schedule and ISO's Appendix A - Guide for Determination of Required Fire Flow. Transportation CDOT has required the phasing plan be included in the traffic study. The traffic consultant needs to contact CDOT for direction on this requirement. Electricity Underground electric service is required and shown. The proposed transformer size will need further review by the Light and Power Department. 15. Outdoor Storage, Areas, Activities and 1Mechanical Equipment The proposed development complies with all applicable standards. 16. Other â€¢ In general, to support the proposed project phasing, the Development Plan must be modified to demonstrate EVPC requirements are met with each of the phases as if the following phases would not be completed. This includes but is not limited to project densities, utilities, parking, and emergency access requirements. â€¢ Please add the bicycle parking requirements/provisions to the Development Plan sheet C-0.0. â€¢ Be aware that when the architectural plans are analyzed for accessibility requirements, changes to the building footprint may require amendment to the Development Plan. â€¢ Signature blocks must appear on the first page of the development plan â€¢ Please identify loading/delivery areas on plan. Page #12 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 , â€¢ How many phases are proposed. A portion of the materials submitted reference two phases, however the Phase Plan notes on C-0.0 reference three phases. Please clarify. â€¢ The plan should clarify that there is no vesting for the proposed additions to the Lake Shore Lodge building. The applicant should also be aware that the proposed additions are very likely to require additional parking and that site redesign is required to provide this parking. There is no guarantee that the proposed additions to the Lake Shore Lodge will be able to be constructed. â€¢ To comply with the Chief Building Official's comments dated March 26, 2007 all required permits shall be obtained and all work completed and approved prior to Planning Commission review o f a new application. 17. Final Development Plan Approval The applicant should be aware that EVDC 3.2.D.2.a EKPC Final Actions states, When the EVPC is the Decision-Making Body, approval of an application shall not become final and appealable until all conditions of approval have been complied with. (See Chapter 2 above.) Acceptance of all conditions of approval and compliance, where feasible (e.g., required revisions to plans and drawings), shall be completed by the Applicant within thirty (30) days of the EVPC's action. If revisions to the plans and drawings are not made within thirty days of Estes Valley Planning Commission approval, the application becomes null and void and resubmittal of the application, along with submittal of a new application fee, is required. I f the development plan also serves as the preliminary condominium map, all revisions to the plans and reports must be made by the "Revisions Due for Town Board" date on the Estes Valley Planning Commission Schedule in order for the Town Board to review the preliminary condominium map application. 18. Denial of the Application I f the application is denied and a new application is submitted, a submittal fee is required. VI. STAFF FINDINGS - CONDOMINIUM MAP 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Development Plan Findings and Conditions Staff recommends that all development plan findings and conditions also become preliminary condominium map findings and conditions. Page #13 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 3. The condominium declaration should state that residential use is not permitted and that the use is limited to accommodations. The wording should be reviewed and approved by staff. A final condominium map must be provided with the final condominium map application. VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends DENIAL of the application to the April 17, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting. As indicated in the Staff Findings, the Development Plan fails to meet a number of requirements contained in the Estes Valley Development Code. A resubmittal of the Development Plan will be required addressing the findings noted in the staff report. VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to approve the application with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the application to the December 19,2006 Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance - findings). Since continuance to the th December 19 meeting is more than a sixty-day continuance, consent of the applicant is required. DENIAL I move to DENY the application because... (state reason.for denial -findings) Page #14 - Lake Estes Village Development Plan #07-03 CORNEA~TONE Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & ~~ ~, SURVEYING, INC. March 28,2007 438.001 Alison Chilcott, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Grueff-Edwards Subdivision Dear Alison: e applicant agrees, at the request o f the Town o f Estes Park, to continue the Grueff-Edwards application to the May 15, 2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. fj /4. Reetz Senior Draftsman -3 t'i ...' f. nÂ·513 1 .IR,! iif->' id 5% Foli] \4 -- .Â· - 4 :it + Â·./ : 1:T 0,11 H ji. Il 28 - HI W.. 11 j11 , t , 11 I , f g 111 TOWN Of ESTES PARK Community Development Department April 3,2007 Ed Grueff 3225 Devils Gulch Road Estes Park, CO 80517 Jes Reetz Cornerstone Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Grueff-Edwards Preliminary Subdivision Application Parcel Identification Number 35244-36-904 Lot 4 of the Plat of Lots 3 through 9 of the Stanley Historic District Dear Mr. Grueff and Mr. Reetz: This letter is to request that review of the Grueff-Edwards preliminary subdivision application be continued from the April to May Planning Commission meeting due to a change in the applicant name. This allows the Town time to publish a new legal notice with the revised applicant name prior to the May 15, 2007 meeting. Sint,rely, 1 Ihddik- Efob Jos+h.ANLA, KICP Community Development Director P.O. BOX 1200 â€¢ 170 MACGREGOR AVENUE e ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 PHONE, BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICE: 970-577-3735 Â© FAX 970-586-0249 PHONE, PLANNING OFFICE: 970-5773721 Â® FAX 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com/ComDev r. , ~ Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone. 970-577-3721 Fax. 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION 1MEETING DATE: April 17, 2007 PRELIMINARY PLAT TITLE: "Preliminary Plat of Kearney Subdivision, a Portion of Lot 12, South Saint Vrain Addition to the Town of Estes Park, County of Larimer, State of Colorado" LOCATION: The site is located at southwest corner of Fish Creek Road (CR 63) and Brook Drive and is addressed 1360 Brook Drive. The property is within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Kearney and Sons Excavating, LLC/Same CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Ross Stephen, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a preliminary subdivision application to divide one "I-1" Restricted- Industrial-zoned lot, totaling 7.397 acres, into three lots, a 4.694-acre lot (proposed Lot 1), a 2.631-acre lot (proposed Lot 2), and a 0.072-acre lot (Outlot A). No change in zoning is proposed. The applicant has submitted a development plan application to construct self-service mini-storage units on proposed Lot 2, which is also being reviewed at the April Planning Commission meeting. This application was originally submitted as a minor subdivision application. Minor subdivisions do not involve any main extensions. The applicant has since determined that a water main extension is required. Due to this revision, the application is no longer considered a minor subdivision. To assist the applicant, staff is supportive of continuing to process the application using the quicker review process for minor subdivisions. , I II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels Existing One Number of Parcels Proposed Three Parcel Number(s) 25314-11-043 Gross Land Area 204.466.32 sq. ft. Lot 1 4.694 acres 2.631 acres 114,615.44 sq. ft. Lot 2 0.072 acres 3.122.805 sq. ft. Outiot A Total 7.397 acres 322,204.57 sq. ft. Net Land Area Not provided Zoning 1-1" Restricted Industrial Existing Land Use Based on use descriptions in the application. staff classifies the existing uses as: (1) Construction Storage Yard, (2) Industry General, i.e., for the excavation business, and (3) Warehousing and Storage (Bulk Storage). Proposed Land Use Same. Storage units may be built on proposed Lot 2. SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No - See Note Streams/Rivers Yes - Fish Creek Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Elk Note: While there are no mapped wetlands on the property, staff believes that wetlands exist on the property based on site visits. A wetlands study would be needed to confirm this. Page #2 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat I Â¥ LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING 1 1 01' e Brook Dr. 61 .RM" T ITE 4 CH" 7.1" d' "RE" ' .9 1-4 ./1 - i gle-Faini~ -~-SF~ 7/ 4 UPI MF SITE ir.- ' Undev- >5; eloped Â¥W" B 81* Single- Storage/ Family / Warehouse 1.1 i Undeveloped - e I /Eating i T Business I. - r 1 Page #3 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat 84 AERIAL PHOTO 132Â»-t/ Villik##4 14.....,.6."1(3 92it~ ' 22/ -rF'r'Z,ook Dr. 7~1,4 '. I. '. 44 4 . *2. -, 1,?fl'. 'I . :- 2 . #/M-'hz.8/Th.: /14/ / al f % fix,11* . '9 . .. , 1/ + 9. 1 15-- . , I. 9 b .L,Â« 1*k 4, 4lf 1. 1 4 \= 81. - 3,~ f - - 14 III. REVIEW CRITERIA All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, "Subdivision Standards," and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. This application does not fall within the parameters of staff-level review. Although the application no longer qualifies as a minor subdivision application, the application will continue to be processed following the quicker minor subdivision review process, i.e., it will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission in preliminary plat form and by the Estes Park Town Board in final plat form. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Estes Park Department of Building Safety See Will Birchfield' s comments to Alison Chilcott dated April 2,2007. Estes Park Public Works Department See Greg Sievers' memos to Alison Chilcott dated January 26,2007 and March 22,2007. Page #4 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat Estes Park Water and Light and Power Departments See Jeff Boles' memos to Bob Goehring dated January 19, 2007 and March 19, 2007 and Mike Mangelsen' s memo to Bob Goehring dated January 24,2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 24,2007 and March 22,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District See Reed Smedley's letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 23,2007 and March 16, 2007. Larimer County Engineering Department See Traci Downs' memos to Alison Chilcott dated January 31, 2007 and March 23,2007. US Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers See Timothy Carey' s letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 23,2007 and March 14, 2007. Owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road See Tom Blaue' s January 28,2007 letter. V. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 3. Adjacent Property Owners Staff received written comments from one adjacent property owner, the owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road. This property is directly across Fish Creek Road from the proposed Kearney Minor Subdivision. Staff has reviewed the concerns expressed by the property owner and addressed many of them in this staff report. This letter was also forwarded to the Police Department since concern was expressed about violations of the Town noise ordinance, which is enforced by the Police Department. 4. Lot Size, Dimensional Standards, and Configuration The lot area/size, width, depth, shape, and orientation are appropriate for the location of the subdivision and type of development and use contemplated. Page #5 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat 5. Uses/Zoning Based on descriptions of the use in the application, staff classifies the existing uses as: (1) Construction Storage Yard, (2) Industry General, i.e., for the excavation business and (3) Warehousing and Storage (Bulk Storage). These uses are permitted in the "I-1" Restricted Industrial zoning district. The owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road expressed concerns that a junkyard is being operated on the property. This use is not permitted in any zoning district in the Estes Valley. A junkyard is defined as "A facility for the display, storage, collection, processing, purchase. sale. salvage or disposal of used or scrap materials, equipment, junk vehicles, appliances or other personal property whether of value or valueless. Junkyard does not include the storage of implements of husbandry, farm tractors, farm or ranch equipment or vehicles customarily operated in a farm or ranch operation." Staff agrees that there is some junk accumulation on the property and that not all the items stored on this site can be attributed to construction storage yard use. Construction storage yard use is defined as "a facility utilized for the storage of vehicles, equipment and materials utilized in the construction industry." The junk accumulation should be removed from the site to the Town' s satisfaction prior to plat recordation. The applicant should contact Carolyn McEndaffer, Plans Examiner/Code Compliance Officer, with any questions and to schedule a site inspection once the site has been cleaned up. 6. Slope Protection and Ridgeline Protection Standards A steep slope separates the two proposed lots. No development is proposed at this time that would be subject to the steep slope protection requirements. The site is not in a ridgeline protection area and is not subject to ridgeline protection standards. 7. Grading, Site Disturbance Standards, Limits of Disturbance Grading will be reviewed once stormwater management facilities are shown on the plan. Top- and bottom-of-wall elevations for should be provided for retaining walls, along with retaining wall details. For example, this is needed for the retaining wall to be relocated onto Lot 1. A forty-percent slope is shown adjacent to the middle driveway and this will also require a retaining wall. EVDC Â§7.5.D provides guidelines for establishing limits of disturbance, e.g., avoidance of visual impacts; avoidance of steep slopes; protection of forests, significant trees, and rock outcroppings; wildfire prevention; mitigation of Page #6 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat geologic hazards; riparian habitat buffering; floodplain setbacks; and protection of significant wildlife habitat areas. Rather than conduct a wetlands study now and placing the wetlands in a platted limits of disturbance, the Community Development Director is supportive of the note on the plat stating that a wetlands study will be required prior to development. The limits of disturbance shown on the plat delineate the areas that are currently disturbed and areas that will be disturbed during construction on Lot 2. They are not intended to be platted limits of disturbance. In some areas the limits of disturbance shown on the plat encroach into the wetlands/wetlands setback because current development encroaches into these areas. 8. Tree and Vegetation Protection No tree/vegetation removal is planned at this time. 9. Landscaping and Buffers Landscaping is not required with this subdivision. 10. Wetlands and Stream Corridor Protection Fish Creek runs through this property and there are wetlands adjacent to the stream. Existing encroachments into the wetlands can remain, provided they are legal, nonconforming encroachments. 11. Geologic and Wildfire Hazards There are no mapped geologic or wildfire hazards on this property. 12. Wildlife Habitat Protection The property is in mapped elk habitat. The plan was sent to the State Division of Wildlife for comments. No comments were received. 13. Exterior Lighting No lighting is proposed at this time. 14. Adequate Public Facilities Adequate public facility requirements include compliance with current water, fire protection, sewer, electric, transportation, and drainage standards. All adequate public facilities must be installed or guaranteed prior to recordation of the plat. An engineer' s cost estimate for the cost of required improvements should be submitted prior to Town Board review of the plat, i.e., by the Revisions Due for Town Board date on the applicable Application and Review Schedule. Water - Domestic Water Pressure Page #7 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat Both lots can be served by Town water. A water main runs along the southern property line of both lots. The Water Department comments include, but are not limited to, the requirement that each lot have a separate water-service line. The shed on proposed Lot 2 must be disconnected from the existing service line that will remain for Lot 1. The service disconnection should be included in the engineer' s cost estimate. Service-line sizing for any required service lines on Lot 2 will be reviewed when development is proposed on this lot. Water - Fire Protection ISO calculations have been routed to the Fire Chief for review. Per a March 30, 2007 letter from Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc., a water main extension and a new hydrant will be required to meet ISO requirements. A site plan showing the proposed main and hydrant was submitted on March 30, 2007. Updated ISO calculations and preliminary construction plans for the water main and hydrant should be submitted. These improvements should also be shown on the preliminary plat. Final construction plans should be reviewed and approved prior to plat recordation. Sanitary Sewer System Lot 1 is currently served by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District (UTSD). Service is not provided to Lot 2. The proposed mini-storage use on Lot 2 does not require a sewer connection at this time and UTSD does not want a main and service tap installed that will not be used. A note should be placed on both the preliminary and final plat stating that at the time of plat recordation, no sewer service is provided to Lot 2. Stormwater Drainage Staff is not supportive of the requested waiver to the stormwater drainage requirements for subdivisions. This is an industrial subdivision immediatek adjacent to a stream and wetlands. As such it can have a significant impact on water qucilitÂ¥. Neighbors have also contacted staff to express concerns about drainage and water quality, and a concrete wall recently fell into Fish Creek, which has a potential impact on water quality. The Public Works Department, Building Department, and Planning Department feel strongly that stormwater drainage needs to be addressed with this subdivision and this requirement should not be waived. Staff is contracting out review of the stormwater drainage and has routed the submitted drainage report to the contractor. The drainage report and plan should be revised to comply with the Code. Staff recommends a one-month continuance of the application to allow time to review a revised stormwater drainage report and plan that complies with the Estes Valley Development Code and addresses comments submitted by reviewing agencies. Page #8 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat A maintenance agreement should be submitted for any proposed drainage facilities. Transportation The applicant has submitted a revised traffic impact analysis. This study was routed to the Town Public Works Department and the Larimer County Engineering Department since the property is adjacent to both Town and County roads, and no concerns were expressed. No road improvements, such as turn lanes, are required. The County has requested dedication of twenty feet of right-of-way for Fish Creek Road (CR 63) and the applicant is agreeable to this. The County has also requested that the Town annex a portion of Fish Creek Road right-of-way, including the portion in front of this property. The plat should include dedication of twenty feet of right-of-way to the Town. At the time of plat recordation, a portion of the right-of-way will be in the County and a portion in the Town. The Town and County are continuing to work together on the details of annexing Fish Creek Road and this annexation may occur after this plat is recorded. A note should be added to the plat stating that dedication of public right-of-way to the Town terminates the Bikepath Slope Easement recorded at Reception 2006-0080500 on this property. Brook and Acacia Drive meet the minimum right-of-way requirements for streets with two curbs. Curb will be installed along the southern property line of both rights-of-ways. Based on the preliminary plat, the paved roads are approximately twenty-four-feet wide. The minimum required road width is twenty-four feet. A retaining wall encroaches into the Brook Drive right-of-way, just to the east of the garage, and should be relocated onto the property. The new location should be shown on the plan. The cost of relocation should be included in the engineer' s cost estimate. Electricity All new electric service is required to be underground. Lots 1 and 2 currently share overhead service. The Light and Power Department noted that the new electric service to the shed needs to be shown on the plat. The electric easement crossing Lot 1 does not appear to be needed since electric service will be obtained from a new location. 15. Gas The Statement of Intent notes that the property is served by Xcel gas; however, existing gas lines are not shown on the plat. Gas lines should be included on the Page #9 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat plat for review. If gas lines cross the proposed lot line, dedication of easements and/or relocation will be required. Since gas is not a required adequate public facility, provision of gas to the proposed lots is not required with the subdivision plat. 16. Underground Utilities All new utilities are required to be buried underground. 17. Utility Easements Generally, ten-foot-wide utility easements are required along all property lines. Staff is supportive of the proposed utility easement dedication. Easements are dedicated along all lines except the Fish Creek Road (CR 63) lot line. Utility providers have not requested easement dedication along this property line. Some, if not all, of this area may be wetlands, in wetlands setbacks, and/or in stream setbacks. As such it is not an ideal location for utilities. 18. Streets and Driveways The property currently has three access points and the proposed subdivision will have three access points. However, these access points will be narrowed and more clearly defined with the construction of sidewalk along Brook and Acacia Drives. The Estes Valley Development Code requires that "Safe, convenient and adequate access to individual buildings by driveways shall be provided...No driveway shall be so located as to create a hazard to pedestrians or motorists, or to invite or compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements." While the driveway on proposed Lot 2 meets the 100-foot minimum sight- visibility requirement, staff remains concerned about safety since large, slow- moving vehicles will be entering and exiting the property on a curve on a hill. The driveway should be located to provide the maximum sight-visibility possible. The applicant should confirm in writing or verbally at the Planning Commission hearing that the proposed driveway location on Lot 2 provides the safest access and the maximum sight visibility. If it does not, the driveway should be relocated. The Statement of Intent includes a requested waiver to asphalt paving. Staff is supportive of this waiver, provided recycled asphalt is used instead. The preliminary plat should clearly define the areas that are proposed to be paved with recycled asphalt. Currently a large portion of the property is unpaved, which contributes to wind erosion. Paving can also assist with stormwater management. Page #10 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat 19. Sidewalk, Pedestrian Connections and Trails, and Private Open Areas EVDC Section 10.5.D.2. Sidewalks states "Sidewalk is required as follows...in all zoning districts, including RE-1 and RE Zoning Districts, sidewalks on both sides of a street may be required along road where the EVPC determines there ,. will be significant pedestrian usage... There is significant pedestrian usage of Brook Drive and Acacia Drive. This sidewalk, along with the sidewalk being constructed on the adjacent Lot 1, Davis Subdivision, can complete sidewalk construction between Fish Creek Road and Avalon Drive. As noted in Greg Sievers' memo, the sidewalk needs to connect to the Fish Creek trail as shown on prior submittals. Staff is supportive of construction of five-foot-wide sidewalk, as required in residential subdivisions, rather than the eight-foot-wide sidewalk required in non-residential subdivisions. For safety reasons, staff is not supportive of constructing sidewalk on the northern side of Brook Drive as requested by the applicant. 20. Signs No signs are proposed. 21. Easements The easement between Lots 1 and 2, Davis Subdivision, needs to be described accurately on the plat. 22. Dedication Statement The dedication statement should be included on the plat and should comply with the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B, Attachment A. The signature block in the dedication statement should accurately reflect the lienholder. The statement of intent mentions that there is a lienholder. 23. Surveyor's Certificate The Surveyor' s Certificate should be included on the plat and should accurately describe the property being surveyed. 24. Adjacent Lots The plat should include the lot, block, and subdivision name for adjacent lots, i.e., "Lot 12, Twin View a Resubdivision" should be shown on the plat. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends CONTINUANCE of the application to the May 15, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. The conditions listed below that required revisions to submitted plans and reports shall be addressed by April 20, Page #11 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat 2007 to allow staff time to reroute the application to affected agencies and tocomplete the staff report by the May 1, 2007 deadline. 1. Compliance with Will Birchfield's comments to Alison Chilcott dated April 2, 2007. 2. Compliance with Greg Sievers' memos to Alison Chilcott dated January 26, 2007 and March 22,2007. 3. Compliance with Jeff Boles' memos to Bob Goehring dated January 19, 2007 and March 19, 2007 and Mike Mangelsen's memo to Bob Goehring dated January 24, 2007. The applicant shall review the proposed private electric easement across Lot 2 which does not appear to be needed with the proposed new location for electric service. 4. Compliance with Greg White' s letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 24, 2007 and March 22,2007. 5. Compliance with Reed Smedley' s letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 23, 2007 and March 16,2007. 6. Compliance with Traci Downs' memos to Alison Chilcott dated January 31, 2007 and March 23,2007. 7. Compliance with Timothy Carey' s letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 23, 2007 and March 14, 2007. 8. The junk accumulation shall be removed from the site to the Town' s satisfaction prior to plat recordation. The applicant shall contact Carolyn McEndaffer, Plans Examiner/Code Compliance Officer, with any questions and to schedule a site inspection once the site has been cleaned up. 9. Top- and bottom-of-wall elevations for shall be provided for retaining walls, along with retaining wall details. For example, this is needed for the retaining wall to be relocated onto Lot 1. A forty-percent slope is shown adjacent to the middle driveway and this will also require a retaining wall. 10. Updated ISO calculations and preliminary construction plans for the water main and hydrant shall be submitted. These improvements shall also be shown on the preliminary plat. 11. Final water main and hydrant construction plans shall be reviewed and approved prior to plat recordation. 12. A note shall be placed on both the preliminary and final plat stating that at the time of plat recordation, no sewer service is provided to Lot 2. Page #12 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat 13. The drainage report and plan shall be revised to comply with the Code. 14. A maintenance agreement shall be submitted for any proposed drainage facilities. 15. The plat shall include dedication of twenty feet of right-of-way to the Town. 16. A note shall be added to the plat stating that dedication of public right-of-way to the Town terminates the Bikepath Slope Easement recorded at Reception 2006- 0080500 on this property. 17. A retaining wall encroaches into the Brook Drive right-of-way, just to the east of the garage, and shall be relocated onto the property. The new location shall be shown on the plan. 18. Gas lines shall be included on the plat for review. If gas lines cross the proposed lot line, dedication of easements and/or relocation will be required. 19. The applicant shall confirm in writing or verbally at the Planning Commission hearing that the proposed driveway location on Lot 2 provides the safest access and the best sight visibility. If it does not, the driveway shall be relocated. 20. The preliminary plat shall clearly define the areas that are proposed to be paved with recycled asphalt. 21. The easement between Lots 1 and 2, Davis Subdivision needs to be described accurately on the plat. 22. The dedication statement shall be included on the plat and shall comply with the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B, Attachment A. 23. The signature block in the dedication statement shall accurately reflect the lienholder. The statement of intent mentions that there is a lienholder. 24. The Surveyor's Certificate shall be included on the plat and shall accurately describe the property being surveyed. 25. The plat shall include the lot, block, and subdivision name for adjacent lots, i.e., "Lot 12, Twin View a Resubdivision" shall be shown on the plat. 26. An engineer' s cost estimate for the cost of required improvements shall be submitted prior to Town Board review of the plat, i.e., by the Revisions Due for Town Board date on the applicable Application and Review Schedule. This engineer' s cost estimate shall include items such as sidewalk construction, drainage facility construction/installation, retaining wall relocation, Page #13 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat disconnection of the water service line, water main and hydrant installation, electric improvements, and paving. Page #14 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to recommend approval of the application to the Town Board of Trustees with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the application to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance -findings). Note: Time frames for action on a subdivision or PUD application may be extended by the reviewers or Decision-Making Body when necessary to receive recommendations or reports from a reviewing agency, but no such extension shall exceed thirty (30) days unless the reviewing agency notifies the reviewer or Decision-Making Body that it needs more time to complete its recommendation. All other extensions of the time periods set forth in this Chapter for review and action on subdivision or PUD applications may be extended by the reviewers or Decision- Making Body only if the Applicant agrees in writing to an extension of time. DENIAL I move to recommend DENIAL of the application to the Town Board of Trustees because.. . (state reason for denial - findings). Page #15 - Kearney Preliminary Subdivision Plat I . i 15,ki Regml.â€¢:3~~=64&4#n kA/Mr,le-Z3 (hz,.. Pt G.,1 - CITY OF LOVELAND PUBLIC WORKS STORMWATER 410 East Fifth Street, Loveland, CO 80537 (970) 962-2627, FAX (970) 962-2908, TDD (970) 962-2620 www.ci.loveland.co.us MEMORANDUM To: Alison Chilcott, Bob Goehring, Greg Sievers From: Chris Carlson CC: Date: 4/5/2007 RE: Kearney Preliminary Subdivision / Kearney Mini Storage I have performed a cursory review of the documentation provided for the above referenced project and offer the following comments for the Town's consideration. If you have any questions or would like to discuss it further, please feel free to contact me. 1. In my opinion, the request for a waiver from certain storm drainage requirements as requested in the Drainage Report is not appropriate for this development and goes against standard engineering practice. The project should be designed and submitted with all required documentation per the Larimer County stormwater criteria, which are adopted by reference in the Town's municipal code and subdivision regulations. The development code specifically states that a "drainage plan prepared by a licensed engineer, showing all proposed drainage facilities, prepared according to the criteria established in the latest revision of the Larimer County Stormwater Management Manual" must be submitted. I saw nothing to indicate that a waiver from the criteria would be appropriate. 2. Please note that Larimer County updated their stormwater criteria in June 2005. The County's criteria is now based upon the "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" (USDCM) by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District with amendments as described in the Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards, which were adopted on June 20,2005. Pages 3 through 7 of the Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards provide preliminary and final drainage report and plan submittal requirements. The report and plan submitted by Cornerstone Engineering falls far short of these requirements. If you so desire, I can provide you specific instances. 3. Unless it's proven that Fish Creek has sufficient capacity and stability and that the timing of undetained stormwater discharging into the Creek provides no adverse impacts, I recommend that on-site detention be required per the Town's requirements and in accordance with Larimer County' s stormwater criteria. In the case of this development, it would require that on-site detention be provided to release at the 2-year rate per Table SO-1 of the USDCM. Fish Creek is vastly different than the Big Thompson River. It has minimal channel capacity and minimal culvert capacity at street crossings. A number of small developments discharging undetained runoff to the Creek could easily exceed the available capacity and have negative consequences, including adverse impacts to both public and private property downstream. This could create legal ramifications for the developer, their engineer, and for the Town. Therefore, short of conducting a basin-wide hydrologic analysis, I recommend that detention always be provided for developments in the Fish Creek basin. 4. The hydrologic calculations included in the drainage report have inconsistencies and missing information. For example, Larimer County's criteria requires the calculation of site specific rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves for Area III, which includes Estes Park. There is no documentation provided to indicate where or how or what was used for rainfall data. Also, the time of concentration equation used comes from the old City of Fort Collins criteria, which is not the same as the equation used in Larimer County's criteria (see Volume 1, Runoff, Section 2.4 of the USDCM). The percent impervious values used also do not match the criteria. All calculations should be revised per the criteria with adequate documentation included. 5. New curb and gutter is proposed for the south side of Acacia Drive. How will runoff carried in this curb and gutter effectively get to the Fish Creek channel in a non-erosive manner? The drawing calls for 4-foot wide channel starting at the end of the sidewalk, but no details or design has been provided. Please note that as shown there will likely be structural problems with the asphalt along the street's edge and erosion problems getting down to the Creek. The current design also eliminates the ability to continue the sidewalk to connect to the existing concrete trail along Fish Creek Rd. An inlet in sump conditions along with extending curb, gutter, and sidewalk to Fish Creek Rd. seems more appropriate and would eliminate the current design's problerns. 6. The current design shows an inadequate approach to improving stormwater quality and protecting the water quality of Fish Creek. This goes for both temporary construction BMP's and permanent stormwater quality BMP's. There is no construction erosion control plan provided or associated discussion in the drainage report. Due to the project's size, it will be required to obtain a Stormwater Discharge Permit from the State Department of Public Health and Enviroment (CDPHE) prior to construction. This includes preparation and submittal of a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). Both should be included with the next submittal. As a minimum, the development should follow Larimer County's criteria and provide the necessary temporary BMP's. Although sedimentation/settling ponds can be a good stormwater quality BMP, the one shown has several inadequacies that should be addressed: (1) the pond must have adequate vehicular maintenance access, which it does not as currently shown, (2) it should be designed per Volume 3 of the USDCM, which the Town's code also references, (3) it should not release concentrated, undetained flows into a natural swale that has never seen these conditions and will likely erode, (4) it should convey "treated" runoff to enter Fish Creek without the possibility of introducing more sediment from an eroding swale, (5) it should also function in a way that will prevent trash, other floatables, and oils from reaching Fish Creek, and (6) it must be designed to prevent bank failure i f overtopped. The natural swale the pond is called to discharge into has a slope in excess of 12% and willlikely erode unless it contains permanent erosion protection measures or another design is proposed. 7. The report does not include any calculations for street capacity (Acacia Dr.) or gutter capacity along the east side of the proposed Lot 2 storage units. ' 1 ~ Kearney Development Plan #07-01 =--~ Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION 1MEETING DATE: April 17, 2007 PRELIMINARY PLAT TITLE: "Kearney Mini-Storage Development Plan" LOCATION: The site is located at southwest corner of Fish Creek Road (CR 63) and Brook Drive and is currently addressed 1360 Brook Drive. The property is within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Kearney and Sons Excavating, LLC/Same CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Ross Stephen, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a development plan application to build eight mini-storage buildings and to relocate the existing construction storage yard from the rear of the property to the front of the property. The development will be located on Lot 2 of the proposed Kearney subdivision. The Kearney subdivision application is also being reviewed at the April Planning Commission meeting. The lot is zoned "I-1" Restricted Industrial-and is 2.631 acres. 1 r II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels One Proposed Lot 2, Kearney Subdivision Parcel Number(s) Current PID 25314-11-043 Gross Land Area 2.631 acres 114.615.44 sq. ft Net Land Area Not provided Zoning "1-1" Restricted Industrial Existing Land Use Construction Storage Yard Proposed Land Use Construction Storage Yard and Mini-Storage Units SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No Streams/Rivers No Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Elk Ridgeline Protection Area No Page #2 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 , LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING -- - Brook Dr. f 'GS aRM" / SIT . CH" . â€¢1-1" y "RE" = ~i Si gle-Faud SF~ ' UPI MF ?:AM -ITE *I,ki 'ftâ‚¬- Undev- ~ eloped fie'la, Single- g., Family / Storage/ Warehouse . CSÂ¥,1 ~/6 '1...1 -1 Undeveloped t :e., 'Excavating Business fl Page #3 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 ~>1 4,0.09:04 Cree4 I , AERIAL PHOTO \ 4 rkj~ 1X 3 2~ 19-C--2-vl/Â£, -3. M.=w.~1 I~~~ :r:w*:,.:hook Dr. " C tr.r + ,4' . .1116 111.... .4 . 6- 1,1 4 9 / #.. I . ..Ir. .. % i.= 4 .A , . 4..... WI~ .$ 4 I .- 63 12 .%- l.' ' f'. f - Â¥df~~ H, / ./.I- 4: " ., 41 ' .-ht CY. 11 1 .11 07'. 1, A. 14 -7 d .4, 6 G 147,1 - /971. Lf~ 2 14:** III. REVIEW CRITERIA The Estes Valley Planning Commission shall review development plan applications and all submitted plans and reports, and evaluate them according to the following standards: 1. The development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code; and 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement and other similar plans. The Estes Valley Planning Commission is the decision-making body for this application. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Estes Park Department of Building Safety See Will Birchfield's memo to Alison Chilcott dated March 26,2007. Page #4 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 Estes Park Water and Light and Power Departments See Jeff Boles' memo to Bob Goehring dated March 19, 2007. Town Attorney See Greg White' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 22,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District See Reed Smedley' s letters to Alison Chilcott dated January 23,2007 and March 16, 2007. Owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road See Tom Blaue's January 28,2007 letter. V. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 3. Adjacent Property Owners Staff received written comments from one adjacent property owner, the owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road. This property is directly across Fish Creek Road from the property. 4. Kearney Subdivision Staff recommends that approval of this development plan be contingent on approval and recordation of the Kearney subdivision plat. Many of the same regulations, such as stormwater management and sidewalk construction, apply to both the subdivision and development plan. If a requirement was addressed in the subdivision staff report, staff has not reiterated the requirement in this report. Any revisions to the subdivision plat application should also be made to the development plan application so the two applications are consistent with each other. 5. Lot Size, Dimensional Standards, and Configuration The proposed development complies with setback, height, floor area, and impervious coverage requirements found in EVDC Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential Zoning Districts. The maximum Page #5 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 allowable fioor area is thirty percent and the maximum allowable impervious coverage is eighty percent. The total impervious coverage is not listed accurately on the development plan. The total impervious coverage should include the "Storage Yard (Northern ,. Portion of Lot)... . This area is proposed as gravel/road base and is not permeable. The maximum allowable impervious coverage should be stated on the development plan. The maximum allowable floor area should be stated on the development plan. 6. Uses/Zoning The proposed self-service mini-storage and construction storage yard uses are permitted uses in the "I- 1" Restricted Industrial zoning district. Special review is not triggered for the mini-storage use since less than 20,000 square feet of storage space is proposed. The plan should demonstrate compliance with EVDC Section 5.1.D Construction Storage Yards, Salvage Yards, Industrial Services (Repair or Storage) by screening the construction storage yard area with a solid (100% opaque) wall or fence with a minimum height of eight feet, and by adding a note to the development plan stating that stored items shall not project above the fence or wall used to screen the material. Solid fencing is proposed along the front property line. This fencing needs needs to continue north and south to adequately screen views of the storage yard from the road. The plan demonstrates compliance with EVDC Section 7.13 Outdoor Storage Areas, Activities, and Mechanical Equipment. This includes a twenty-foot setback from the front property line for the construction storage yard. 7. Slope Protection and Ridgeline Protection Standards Buildings are proposed to be constructed directly adjacent to a steep slope, a portion of which is supported by an existing retaining wall. The detailed grading and drainage plan, which will be required to be submitted with the first grading/building permit, should be stamped by an engineer and should address the stability of these slopes and retaining walls. Existing retaining walls may need to be redesigned and additional retaining walls constructed. The erosion- control fabric noted on the development plan may not be sufficient to stabilize the proposed slopes. This property is not in a ridgeline protection area. 8. Grading, Site Disturbance Standards, Limits of Disturbance The plan demonstrates positive drainage and includes a proposed filtration pond. Grading will rereviewed once updated stormwater management plans and Page #6 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 reports are submitted for review and approval and the development plan is revised to reflect any changes in design. Staff is supportive of the construction limits of disturbance shown on the development plan. 9. Tree and Vegetation Protection Staff will review the tree and vegetation protection once all the trees and shrubs are shown on the development plan. Grading next to the sixteen-inch ponderosa closest to Building 8 should be revised to remove the approximately one foot of fill that is proposed on top of its root zone. 10. Landscaping and Buffers Staff is supportive of counting existing trees and shrubs towards the minimum required landscaping; however, those trees and shrubs need to be shown on the development plan with size and species noted. Once this information is submitted staff can review the plan to determine if it meets Code requirements. Staff is supportive of waiving the district buffer requirement between the "CH" and "I- 1" zoning district. This buffer is intended to screen incompatible or differing land uses. The proposed mini-storage use is not incompatible with the adjacent uses, which also include proposed mini-storage development. The impervious coverage number used in Step #1 of the Landscape Requirements Worksheet on Sheet 1 of 2 is incorrect - 52,550 square feet should be used rather than 41,000 square feet. Staff may be supportive of the waiver to the landscaping buffer next to the Carriage Hills Outlot and will update the Planning Commission prior to the public hearing. 11. Fencing Since this property is in mapped elk habitat, gaps in fencing are required. Staff is supportive of waiving this requirement provided the fencing proposed along the southern lot line is relocated adjacent to Building 8. 12. Exterior Lighting The only exterior lighting proposed will be attached to the buildings. Staff is supportive of the proposed lighting plan. 13. Signs No signs are proposed. 14. Other. "Due" should be spelled correctly in Note #1. The legend is repeated on Pages 1 and 2. It should only appear on one of the pages. The symbol for the asphalt Page #7 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 surface should be revised to match the symbol used on the plan. The vicinity map also should be to scale. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends CONTINUANCE of the application to the June 19, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. The conditions listed below that require revisions to submitted plans and reports shall be addressed by the Submittal Deadline in the in Application and Review Schedule, i.e., April 25,2007. 1. Approval of this development plan shall be contingent on approval and recordation of the Kearney subdivision plat. 2. Any revisions to the subdivision plat application shall also be made to the development plan application so the two applications are consistent with each other. 3. The total impervious coverage is not listed accurately on the development plan. The total impervious coverage shall include the "Storage Yard (Northern Portion of Lot)...". 4. The maximum allowable impervious coverage shall be stated on the development plan. 5. The maximum allowable floor area shall be stated on the development plan. 6. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with EVDC Section 5.1.D Construction Storage Yards, Salvage Yards, Industrial Services (Repair or Storage) by screening the construction storage yard area with a solid (100% opaque) wall or fence with a minimum height of eight feet and by adding a note to the development plan stating that stored items shall not project above the fence or wall used to screen the material. Solid fencing is proposed along the front property line. This fencing needs to continue north and south to adequately screen views of the storage yard from the road. 7. The detailed grading and drainage plan, which will be required to be submitted with the first grading/building permit, shall be stamped by an engineer and shall address slope stability and retaining wall stability. Existing retaining walls may need to be redesigned and additional retaining walls constructed. The erosion control fabric noted on the development plan may not be sufficient to stabilize the proposed slopes. 8. All existing trees and shrubs shall be shown on the development plan. Page #8 - Kearney Development Plan #07-() 1 9. Grading next to the sixteen-inch ponderosa closest to Building 8 shall be revised to remove the approximately one foot of fill that is proposed on top of its root zone. 10. The impervious coverage number used in Step #1 of the Landscape Requirements Worksheet on Sheet 1 of 2 is incorrect - 52,550 square feet shall be used rather than 41,000 square feet. 11. The fencing proposed along the southern lot line shall be relocated adjacent to Building 8. 12. "Due" shall be spelled correctly in Note #1. 13. The legend is repeated on Pages 1 and 2. It shall only appear on one of the pages. The symbol for the asphalt surface shall be revised to match the symbol used on the plan. 14. The vicinity map also shall be to scale. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to recommend approval of the application to the Town Board of Trustees with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the application to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reasonfor continitance - findings). DENIAL I move to recommend DENIAL of the application to the Town Board of Trustees because... (state reason for denial - findings). Page #9 - Kearney Development Plan #07-01 I 1 { :s:!spfk tInf9:3:ve,5:~"Iten~ad~~n~-01 Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 vI: m~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2007 LOCATION: The Fun City/Slides site is located 375 Moraine Avenue and 455 Prospect Village. The proposed bungee trampoline and climbing wall will be located at 375 Moraine Avenue at the corner of Moraine Avenue and US Highway 36. The legal description for 375 Moraine Avenue is Lot lA, Amended Plat of Lots 1 . and 2, Lee and Alps Addition, and Lot 9A and Outlot A of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision. The property is within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Lon Kinnie, Slides, Inc./Same STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a special review application to add a bungee trampoline and climbing wall to the existing development at 375 Moraine Avenue. II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels One Parcel Number(s) 35253-92-001 Gross Land Area 1.84 acres 80,150 sq. ft Net Land Area Not provided Zoning "CO" Outlying Commercial Existing Land Use Commercial Recreation or Entertainment Establishments, Outdoor (Amusement Park/Miniature Golf) Proposed Land Use Commercial Recreation or Entertainment Establishments, Outdoor (Amusement Park/Miniature Golf) C , SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Estes Park Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No Streams/Rivers Yes - Big Thompson River Floodplain Yes Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes -Deer LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING I - C + 37_Â«3-i;ti --i -7, foning:, Zoning: E ~~ m 7 4 11. 1 US Hwy 36 bÂ· 1 040 1/LC / NE: 1 1,1/,03.71 1 . ' Site , 47* /CP:> 1 ':5:2,0.t 1 1 Li a 14â‚¬ I , U) 9 < Zoning: CO 8 1. v..SED -1 Â«724'' ----*ji 2-- Â·Â·~ i : .*423 A J Aff-Â· 2 Zoning: A 11@. 414*\ .... goning: R 4 /f\ ./ 1,7 .el .... 66*AckÂ« e- Page #2 - Fun City Special Review #07-01 ( - ./ ir=L - 1 -w--~-,-,4/ Site 1 Shopping Big Tho 1 -Ctr - Mixed 1 Commercit - Uses ~ Fun Trax - - ~testauraet ~/lem . L,1-#-- Aerial Tramway .:1):*.. -",0.-- 27 -> /A AERIAL PHOTO ... 4 . . 'tj Alify' .1 ; h ..f â€ži 011'm. 1 *. .... Â» . t.i I. :: r 14'' m . 3, a , - , im 4- 1 % f V 1 rp'' A. 4 - 16 -14: 41 . le ~2 ) .... 1.- r Page #3 - Fun City Special Review #07-01 1,1// III. REVIEW CRITERIA The Estes Valley Planning Commission shall review development plan applications and all submitted plans and reports, and evaluate them according to the following standards: 1. The development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code; and 2. The development plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and any other relevant land use, parks and trails, capital improvement and other similar plans. Also all applications for a special review use shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable criteria and standards set forth in Chapter 5, "Use Regulations," of this Code and the following requirement: The application for the proposed special review use mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment. The Town Board is the decision-making body for this application. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Estes Park Department of Building Safety See Will Birchfield' s memo to Alison Chilcott dated March 26,2007. Estes Park Public Works See Greg Sievers' email to Alison Chilcott dated March 26,2007. Estes Park Water and Light and Power Departments See Jeff Boles' memo to Bob Goehring dated March 14, 2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 22,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District See Reed Smedley' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated March 16, 2007. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service See Vaughn Baker' s letter to Bob Joseph dated March 29,2007 Page #4 - Fun City Special Review #07-01 rÂ¥ V. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 3. Adjacent Property Owners No comments were received from adjacent property owners. 4. Special Review Staff finds that the application for the proposed special review use mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment. 5. Lot Size, Dimensional Standards, and Configuration The proposed development complies with setback, height, floor area, and impervious coverage requirements found in EVDC Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential Zoning Districts. 6. Uses/Zoning The proposed use, Commercial Recreation or Entertainment Establishments, Outdoor, is permitted by special review in the "CO" Outlying Commercial zoning district. The use has been established on the property for many years and the applicant is requesting to expand the use by adding a bungee trampoline and a rock-climbing wall. For the past two summers, the applicant has received a temporary use permit to install the bungee trampoline and rock-climbing wall on a temporary basis. Approval of the special review application would allow the trampoline and wall to used without review of an annual temporary use permit. Staff did not notice any problems with the use during the past two summers and did not receive any complaints. 7. Signs No signs are proposed. Page #5 - Fun City Special Review #07-01 1 1 '' VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the application to the CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Compliance with Will Birchfield's memo to Alison Chilcott dated March 26, 2007. 2. Compliance with Greg Sievers' email to Alison Chilcott dated March 26,2007. 3. Compliance with the submitted application and plans. 4. Failure of the applicant to apply for a building permit and commence construction or operation with regard to the special review use approval within one (1) year of receiving approval of the special review use shall automatically render the decision null and void. 5. If a legally established special review use is abandoned or discontinued for a period of one (1) consecutive year or more, then the decision originally approving such special review use shall automatically lapse and be null and void. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to recommend approval of the application to the Town Board of Trustees with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the application to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance -findings). DENIAL I move to recommend DENIAL of the application to the Town Board of Trustees because... ( state reason for denial - findings). Page #6 - Fun City Special Review #07-01 . 1 MEMORANDUM To: Alison Chilcott, Planner II From: Will Birchfield, Chief Building Official I)ate: March 26,2007 Subject: Fun City 455 Prospect Village Drive The Department of Building Safety has reviewed the application for Special Review 07-01 for the above-referenced property and offers the following comments: The Bungee, Trampoline and the Climbing Wall are not within a building and are exempt from permitting requirements (2003 IBC 411.1, exception). It is the property owner' s responsibility to ensure these devices are safe for public use. Public Works and Planning should verify all public improvements required by previous permits have been properly provided and approved. r Page 1 of 1 0 1 Alison Chilcott From: Greg Sievers Sent: Monday, March 26,2007 11:16 AM To: Alison Chilcott; Dave Shirk; Julie Roederer Subject: FW: Plan Review Re: Horse drawn carriage - PW has no comments Re: Fun City - PW has no comments, except to reiterate that no on-street parking is allowed on Riverside Drive. Attached please also find PW comments for Gueff-Edwards & Kearney Sub. Greg Sievers Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering P.O. Box 1200 (mail) 170 MacGregor Avenue (shipping) Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586 0 970-586-6909 f 970-227-0437 c gsievers@estes.org http://www.estesnet.com/publicwork*Engineering/default,aspx -----Original Message-- From: Bob Goehring Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:46 AM To: Greg Sievers Subject: Plan Review Utilities Director Bob Goehring TOWN OF ESTES PARK P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3580 bgoehring@estes.org 3/26/2007 Water Department - ESTES PARK 7~2WATER Inter-Office Memorandum To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 3/14/2007 Re: Fun City Lot 1A, Amended Plat of Lee & Alps & Prospect Village (not complete) 455 Prospect Village Drive After review of Special Review 07-01 the Light and Power and Water Department have no comments. 03/16/2007 FRI 15:52 FAX 970 586 4544 UPPER THOMPSON SAN DIST <r e I@001/001 . Upper Thompson Sanitation Dis trict PO Box 568 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 March 16, 2007 Alison Chilcoti Planner Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Ref: Fun City Lot la, Amended Plat of Lee & Alps & Plospect Village (not complete) 455 Prnspect Village Drive DearAtison, The Distlict has no objection to this request Thank you for your time. Sincerely, ALÂ«* Reed W. Smedley Lines Superintendent UpperThompson Sanitation District CC: Lon Kinnie PO Box 483 Estes Patk, CO 80517 Post-itÂ® Fax Note 7671 Date 3-11.-69 pages AE #01 . . TO A--li ,9.1 (1 le rvAA, From Â£9~ 1%74 kk v-1 Co./Dept.1-b- a 2% CO. tyrao Pnono # 7-2726 Phone # 6Â·PS:19 Fax # 4- 0,249 fax # .- 2.-l649 GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 .oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 March 22,2007 ALISON CHILCOTT, PLANNER 63~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT hU1214_112007=~ii j j TOWN OF ESTES PARK 'Ljj PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Special Review 07-01 - Fun City Dear Ms. Chilcott: I have no comment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Very/f~y Yours, f I /3 . lÂ» Gregog f White GAW/ldr CC: Lon Kinnie P O Box 483 Estes Park, CO 80517 râ€¢ -1- ,/ C C United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Rocky Mountain National Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 IN REPLY REFER TO: A3815 MAR 2 9 2007 Mr. Bob Joseph Town ofEstes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Joseph: We recently became aware of the Special Review application that was submitted to your office to add bungee trampoline jumping and a rock climbing wall at Fun City. We recall that several years ago when the new miniature golf course and go cart track were added to Fun City, the owner made a non-binding commitment to the town trustees that if the new uses were successful, 1 the slide would be removed. As part of this Special Review process to add additional uses at Fun City, we would respectfully request that the earlier commitment by the owner be revisited. Sincerely, Gvj_ LL Vaughn Baker Superintendent ec: Lon Kinnie - Fun City 3 STATEMENT OF INTENT Slides Inc application for Special Review We would like to request that the family entertainment devices, bungee trampoline jumping and a rock climbing wall, be added to our existing uses. These devices have been in use the past two summer seasons under special use permits and have not created any negative comments as a property use. 34.0-0, ) L- Lon W Kinnie Slides Inc. DBA Fun City PO Box 483 Estes Park, CO 80517 970-586-3173 Lkinnie@aol.com , 4 I rim-: 2-+ .. M FEB 2 1 .uu, , 1 i j i 131 1 'i .-- 6-gin ,;.Â·.-,. :Â·::--Â· - -1 â€¢Â·i neÂ·t, r--Â·Â·.. . ESTES VALLEY ( i i f.0 1-Â©A !1 - 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 9 ~ .fi' tii FEB 2 1 2007 : I '1 92! 1 11 Submittal Date: 2/2/ ~01 . .1 1 ''~ Special Review f- ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change 1- Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify Minor Subdivision Plat Amended Plat General Information Project Name Fo-* 047 Project Description e> en.bcÂ·vld.\ 44*vi ~ f)Aer-Li*ww~6 jiucces : 64~v,~ee ~~-'T,cl: mb: Z) D 411 Project Address 4 59 9 vaspetor VT Haae-D rte e Legal Description 1-Dt l A amendek p(2' Lee *Alp,4 Pv~spe,AÂ· Vil\G-,e (Lel- <mnp(ete ) U Parcel ID# 3525 39260\ Section Township Range Site Information Total Development Area (acres) \ . 24 Existing Land Use -LA (\ 7 e.*elt . -1 4 Proposed Land Use 64Â»,e Existing Water Service PTown F Well F Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 21-own r Well F Other (Specify) , Existing Sanitary Sewer Service P EPSD r UTSD r Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service P' EPSD r UTSD r Septic Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes P- No Existing Gas Service Pi Xcel C Other F None Existing Zoning C_ O Proposed Zoning CO Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes P<No Has site staking been completed? F Yes r No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person Ze> A M z IAM Â¢ e Mailing Address ~90 -Beer *123, 25+e s Park, co %05 1-7 Attachments P- Application fee 4 Statement of intent f- 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan f- 11"X 17"reducedcopyofplatorplan P Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park a P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue Â·a Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 + Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www,estesnet,com/ComDev 3 -1 1 -1 1 ~ IType of Application Primary Contact Person is 9~ Owner P-'Applicant F- Consultant/Engineer Record Ownercs) 1% li k<, 321Â£, Mailing Address re 6 -jtcm 4@-3 Elteâ‚¬~*t CO 709 1 -7 Phone 9-70 566 3 1-73 Cell Phone 97 0 214 34-74 Fax 9 -7 6 5 86 20 1 6 Email l~ 141 KYG e 93 /4-(bL . C.ewi Applicant 5/:49 -Ikc. ) Zes u /6 .4 e Mailing Address Phone (-S Q.Kie h Cell Phone Fax Email 'Ir--; 7,3.9 /---â€¢, ' D *' h 7 FA- 7--1 A14Â·,26--Â· Consultant/Engineer :4 2, 11 anÂ· Mailing Address 7Â·P '' ' r r ,/ 1 f .Â·1,-Pr'V-7 ' 'i, 11: FED L | Ll/Ul Phone L $ 4 . Cell Phone Fax ~ k 3 Unt=-Â·--Â· *-Â·--'p-t--reÂ·Â·c 7-Â·t~==2~-Â·-=Â·C-- Email APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/Com Dev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: itures: Record Owner Date Applicant Date Contact Information C . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge ~ and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/Com Dev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. â€¢ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. * I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: S (QLS Ike. Applicant PLEASE PRINT: ~-0,1/ Mt virti <a Signatures: Record Owner Date 2 ~ll ~0-7 Applicant Date Â·, P '; j 1 j' i.? y<' 1!, 1.I .4 ~ 1 : 1 1,1 3 A.; 4 1 1 FEB 21 2007 4 jIJ 2 t â‚¬ 31 1 F, 1 j 1 d' M /j, L .2,-9 d Revised 10/13/06 --:Â·51-~y.=Â·t# ' Salto-Trampolino Profile C Page 1 of 2 Pr~ ey in : t *lb@6 44% MtÂ® TRAM, tift ....*,r. ... 271 -f -1 Â·22&Â·S /4 1/*YA--- Af 1 .Alff/1 0. ---- 1 # 'RaLâ€¢U /Â¥If] b 1 4 Kibr rÂ· '~ i' 'IillL: - ' _il,di@i -=i-Ef-xE,11-4=ZE:~ _r.il,E~ 11. 1.7 -4,1 -_=31'11, -Il il~~ -31!PR -clf=1|%7== 11 11 - 111.11111-1 1, Ilrftttfi,=Tur-=fm===Tilmâ€¢mF= il: i =E-,-11- . 1. 1 lili 1. 11[jkll k ,~| ~, ~1! 1 ~~~ li~!,I- ~ + ill f . 41 1.- :51 Mft,- Itt 1.. -El 1. *f .31 11 1 1'.1 -71117- 1Â·11-1 ,1.='~1 1-1, 11.1 1111 11! 1 - 111 1.Â·1 i 11 111'r .6 .2- f ==1 - 1 friA - 544-1' ' Â¥*44<159:.!41~ 1-09iuY=Zi-fu. ~-2=jill#1 11- 1114 40 9.11,1 ...: A multitude of options are open to you, installation is easy and there are a number of appropriate sites available. The Salto Trampolino is adaptable to all situations, at the beach or in the mountains, indoors or outdoors, summer or winter, at skating rinks, waterparksl games parks, festivals, mails, anywhere you can imagine! All kinds of enterprises and commerce's are great potential clients for their inaugurations, events, presentations of new products, motivational workshops, etc. Specifications Salto-Trampolino Profile C c Page 2 df 2 â€¢ Weight: 2,000 lbs. â€¢ Set up time: 2 people 3 hours â€¢Space requirement for set 40' x 40' x 26' (tall) UP: â€¢ Power source: Comes with 220 or 110 23' x 4' x 4'; F.O.B. Smithfield, â€¢ Shipping crate size: Utah ..Â·:6,6//*>.:e:el->*Â·8 '<:Â·Â·Â·Â·redÂ·: '193Â·Â«Â·>.:>Â·*5Â·Â·:>:, Earnings Potential Order Form ' Climb 'N Dangle - Spectrum C uts - Portable Climbing Wall C Page 1 of 2 t -4 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 11 - 1-1 -9-1 1 te , L 1-S, 6 -1 1 1-11-1 1 . 11 .+ 1 -11 home | about us | contact us | new products | distributors | service truck 1 -1 - 1 Â· .; 1 1 1- , 1 , 1, tin , ' 1 40, 11 A .' 1 ,11,11'. 11 :1 'I .4.INÂ·' , WillY 71 1 1 -11 11 1~11 - 11 .11 1 lili- 1 1 11 1 1 141 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 ' 1 1 1 ' :1 - .T~'' 1 r. elli 1 1 1 1 11, 4 Â©1 71 Â¥ 1 1 #' ' 1. 411 i . 1 t i . ~ ' 'i, 2 2' ' 4 â€ž, :i, . i Drop A Rock Product Photos ~, Climb 'N Dangle Wall Colors Rascal Racers Accessories 'It Power Tower Printable Spec Sheets ~ -- * ,â€¢t Rascal Rocket Movie I- 1 3 Kick -2,~; ' 4, ,''l Ascent Rock Kids Climb 4-1 , ht! '~'=:~, :.1 Potential Income m 1. 11 ./ 991. t 11'.-- - ' Brochures to print 9 -9 Photos 'b .*47 -_ ' r'lÂ·*:'1 i 0.-_ - - 12L-JL-'49Â· ,â€¢'.*.4 1--d 11 1 --LI"_ 12 - ;111 1 _Â·_ . _.__ I. _~ ' '' il, 4 I .-,_4 1 4,4,1*53=41#-,Â·lt*;!1~'211 Ii,irt'#t-*-'â€¢1|'il '6'404~~5 1F~* 4 ,: 1 , T= 1 1 1 .1 Climb 'N Dangle - Portable Climbing Wall The Spectrum SportsTM Climb N DangleÂ® was the first ever mobile climbing wall on the ' Chances are that you have either climed or seen one of these walls in your travels, sinc original mobile climbing wall with Auto-Below, our Automatic Belay system-exclusive to manufactured by Spectrum Sportsâ„¢ and used in all of our climbing products. It is the o redundant belaying system in existence, allowing for safe, fun, solo, climbing. This is th other companies have tried to copy since the first one was produced in Logan, Utah in Climb N DangleÂ® is designed to accomodate 3 people climbing at one time. The Climb is great for birth birthday parties, carnivals or fairs, grand opening events, special prom, building events, nightclubs, etc. Plan on 15 minutes for set-up on this product. The Clin' DangleÂ® is still the flagship climbing wall on the market today. All Climb N Dangles are 24 mobile or stationary units. E-mail or call for more information. ClimbNDangle by Spectrum Sports Int'I is a mobile climbing wall, which comes with the safety system. The portable ClimbNDangle was the first mobile climbing wall with the a system to hit the amusement industry. This 3 person mobile climbing wall or stationary comes in a 24 foot model for mobile or can be built at a custom height for your stationa The ClimbNDangle climbing wall systems come with all of the climbing equipment that ' start operations. The ClimbNDangle mobile climbing wall comes on a trailer. Drop & Gc stationary kits are available for all ClimbNDangle models. Custom colors and themes a The ClimbNDangle stationary outdoor walls are in most of the major theme parks arour The ClimbNDangle is the most extreme mobile climbing wall on the market. The Climbf fully engineered extreme mobile climbing wall on the market. Custom colors and theme available. Approved by the Federal government for use in the military. The ClimbNDanf serviceable climbing wall. On site service available for the ClirnbNDangle from Spectrui Int'I. Engineering for our walls are all done by a third party. Proudly make in the USA. T belay safety system has been engineered and tested with years of proven safety. Our Â£ was the first on the market to use hydraulics', dual cylinders, wire rope and an open de: this system to be the safest and best auto-belay in the amusement market. Our service change out your auto-belay cables on your ClimbNDangle mobile or stationary climbing Climbing on the ClimbNDangle climbing wall can be a vertical challenge to all thrill seel reality of climbing on a vertical ClimbNDangle mobile climbing wall is an extreme exper mounted climbing walls can be found all over the world. Mobile climbing wall business c prefer the ClimbNDangle. The ClimbNDangle mobile climbing wall is a great rental wall portable mobile climbing wall with the ClimbNDangle. . . .. i. l h NAN A 00 N 2 10 10 10 TO~J;&1 g 00 2 Mg h 00 00 000 @ 0000000% Roo 0 00000004 00 -0 2.2 -2 2 0 -2 Â·0 645 KE-M-0-Ziuse~282588 w n O D- " 0. c a. 0. 0- 0. 0. 0 0- c ~-00 CD ~ 0-5 0 0 0 0 00 0< 43% 2% 3% 2 2 2 2 3% 3% O1-U LL LU 11111 -1 LU LU LL[ LU 111 LI_ LU 0 0 0 0 > (0 -C 1 g 00 LU N N h M#gr:322 GE E cu m 9- C\1 88Â£%8~955555~2 a (DiD h m r 00 00 00 00 00 00 < Uj 5 * &18 0 90 0 00 0 ES 6*3 9 < 00 (\100 00 0- 1- O- O- O- O- O- A - h O -OCS -7 U.1-,COBmi ZQI David & June Boon old Court 80526 D. Christopher Wells Patricia Thompson 1507 Buttonwood Drive Fort Collins, O 80525 ward & Gisela Grueff Gulch Road ark, CO 80517 , CO 80517 e~rga&hM CO 80538 Riilk ence Ent., LLC 2150 8051 80517 Gene & Elisabeth Whannel 607 Parliament Court Fort Collins, O 80525 hn & Patricia Bicknell Avenue Robert Sunderland Mulberry Street, #745 Rex & Vanessa Rae Stahla yside Drive Donald & Annette Stone vis Street Owner Owner 11 ddress Thomas & Andrew Wykstra LO-1.0 MelAey lepeds Al!O un:I mes & Lotitr'SI A. Morris~C & Michael Richardson EM *1 00 0: E IO 5..*I-Â·.z.... ~-- - h b@Â¥~ U(.... Etr.. :f: 11 Lr> r. '-7 ! 0:WOE 1 ...T. - 3Alklc SOVE!0 3001&18 iRI tj 92 ~'tr 0 -(N I .1 Z\(n 1 \ \ 0 il 1.i- 11 ti 0 - M O < 8,- 1 0=* 5% 1 i 1 4-2...â€ž W . Â·f . ~Â·I :-91.If~=0==j 1 6 2% O * 0 44%<D 1 Go. Z a. 0078 13>lou O ga#N 0 1 1 4 --Jo- m Ft o \ ~" 1 2 1 - Lic) 6 4 9 I '*' r Z 1 4 <0 N (f>Daio O 0 9 0 0219 411 - Afl 8% 27-3 4 Ck:OX ./. WL - - i W 2 4,/ 8 1 / 5 lu CEM- .Wl * \ â€žE J /2 9 4% ~ 2 k =mR 21 b 0 C % 1 |el e 0 + / S LU CE Z 1 Wk- CO 4 0 (/) LU C N 1 lal 0 0.a IJ OP: 1 O [1- 7E '2Â¥0 z *z 6 - 8// lag O Dt1 now . 9147 wo w CE m C ci E-- . 2 0- a / 2 9 1 i-73--9 6 #m & 342 ' 1 L.2. 5 1 <09 r Ze U :* Â£ l'~9 ZQ. U i-- - .&3' .,20 490> # w $ 4 ~La H.~OS o. L Â·26 L.LI RN@ A ("1. . /424> ,00.04 9.Â¥L-/18 9- , -71) W2O . & 1 1 1 U- S B 3, Eg~ I C Bid * 37 evik - N *a. 1 1 0 wk . A ~- IUM W kin 9%2 r... 1 & S #h. Â£44 92 J /1 b, Bl Fi <0/ i m 4 .44 2 A < d 1 .'56 .% 4 00 219' . se T L .. 9 + cjf' 4 + ~ *44114 ti % . .4. .'. 1 1 i F HY 47,3+3 ... 34*ve* 49 4 CD i . - . 00 00 -t .4Â¢6 \ 10 LU [(1 12 0 /E '00.- 6 9 / )- 8 0// 044 C I 24 4 i .4. i/b 1 A. NA \ A. . ,?JU I 8' t / Â¢b 11 ' 4 i, #8PeÂ· -'sal 62 1 / h \/A 7%* .t Â». @ie Y ~7:t * .43~ LÂ· O . I : / ,-50- ~4.00 ~~(~42151 1 .. , I I 14 . 5 1 Â£ . 9.k / 6 - ts. 1 YEAR N . 4%':0:00 ~=f/W 31[ . O 0 1 9 8 00.02 513 = .Â°0'02 . 1Â·" : '~ f i .. e 'K 1 , . . ... 16 2 4 1 R i 0 1 , 11'g 1- 1 , N Â«31' 1 . .. 1 21 "' 51') . ' 1 25 1 . 04 m 1 1 00 . - I. 1 ZI 0 9wJ I I 0 1 2 1 101 1 0, 1 li P 1 I lili i z'91 n 1.- iD \\ 101 u. . g Chi OL W W All - i > W =1 rwE b &* 4 3 1 r -/ 1/ '-z P t. ':. B 21 1 47 4 \ \ ad = 0 1 88 , f. 1- 00 La 5 (10 0'4 i *1, ~ 831.34 33VJ Npbc. . 0 LLJ 8= 0 1 <2 1. 1 f '03N E O b LL' WS 0 2 P .4 q. \ /F Cm-EL =j. , 00 A0O t- , 0. A--- S- I , 4 0 '4 1 1 LL b \ i 5 1 6 9 -7 - - i- 0Z :Â» 0 1 Â£O 40 * ONI1SIX3 ~ fri , . N 40 .. / -9-11Â¥HdSÂ¥ = . Â· 0 -- 5 r- ~-6 .99 99 L e O -- . 69,0-' 9| 3 .00.00.00 N t' 6.. C O CkaÂ· P COÂ·CL , k Wi 45 H It "" P O W g i E < u A u n :-0 \ NO LEI r- 86 <-3 F : Â»: kees, COUNTY OF LAR I STATE OF COLOMADO. S c~o_Ce: I ": Â£4(3 ' TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH RANGE ST OF THE 00 E.99 â€¢ WITNESS CORNER 3 .6(N L.It t ~ Horse Drawn Carriage Special Review - Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: April 17,2007 REOUEST: A request by Jerry and Carol Higgason (based in Evans) for horse-drawn carriage rides within the Town of Estes Park. FILE #: Special Review 07-02 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND: This is a Special Review proposal for horse-drawn carriage rides within the Town of Estes Park. Services are to 1 include wedding transportation, other special events, and carriage rides along a fixed route. Normal hours of operation for the fixed route will be from 9:00 AM until 9:00 PM daily. The proposed route is one that has been approved by the Town on prior occasions (see attached map). The applicant intends to use the stables at the Elkhorn Lodge as a base of operations. REVIEW CRITERIA: In accordance with Â§3.5 Special Review Uses of the Estes Valley Development Code, "the application for the proposed special review use mitigates, to the maximum extent feasible, potential adverse impacts on nearby land uses, public facilities and services, and the environment." Traffic. The proposal has been submitted to the Estes Park Police Department and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for an opportunity o f review and comment. At the time this report was written, Staff had not received any comments from either CDOT or the Police Department. Planning Staff recommends that any future additions or revisions to the routes or stops be approved by Town Staff, including but not limited to the Public Works and Police departments. In addition, Planning Staff recommends the following condition be placed on approval: If traffic conflicts or other use conflicts occur on the streets or at the public stop locations, 1 / Town Staff is authorized to restrict operations until the problem is corrected. This is intended to account for accidents, parade routes, periods of heavy traffic, or other instances of traffic hazards or congestion. Pick-up and Drop-off points. Public drop-off and pick-up locations are proposed to be limited to the Transit Center and Tregent Park. Other proposed locations include the Stanley Hotel, St. Bartholomew's, and Our Lady of the Mountains. S$TUATE . *I. ) 1-T--1 11 *fÂ».. 1 j IK, ; ~ ~,944/, >- iakfit'*.- Â·- :41*6#4.Nt - , .â€žnoN..f-.#........ 0, rk. .TW . 74. .. 0, 7..7... 7,~ In, C, r,I 4â„¢ P* 4-4 2 El[7- t ,:Â· 2 \ : 1 A 1 ' 1 L- 'Â·'- TTT i ' I---01.-2072.- -\ 1 I t r.-7 ~ ~ ~~t....13,-_-23-7Â»--th . . ~ 1 1 1-.Â·,â€žA. --- -DIE, - 1 , !- iii 1 4Â·Â·n \11 . 1 : - - -Â·1,1.1+1Â·101,7 1 f, 1 17 f 6 1_ ~ ~~~ ~t.4- . â€ž,Â·.v.. 6% 1 Â·Â·--' .- f.' 1 3 - :1 .,4':4.~ 1.::. 46 i Ed Mil -'Â·: 1*.. : Jr - 557: -2 --3 i -' , . 1 E: .. 1 1781Â·.-:,, 2~14 - .. -4-.-: re... ... N .r. . . . 4 1 :. J ' -3 -'. -' :' Â·97'1 kÂ·0 t.,"Â·tlcah 4 4 LO* q Â·7. ._ p - 4 1-4044 'N!*Tp--f ' :*- -4 ... 0 . .: -1.0...â‚¬ fllull#11,21#E[*,-&244.0t.3.1 --112.0 ~ , 1 Â£4" 4.= Â·Â·4'-Â·ricÂ©41~~,~i')/adAS#21./.r=V,j 74,/ Business License. In accordance with Â§5.20.040 Business License Required of the Town of Estes Park Municipal Code, the applicant shall be required to obtain a business license from the office of the Town Clerk. Prior to application for a business license, the applicant should provide a copy of a Certificate of Insurance for $1,000,000 to the Town, with the Town to be named as an additional insured. Signage. In accordance with the Town of Estes Park Sign Policy, no signage shall be allowed on public property. Horses. All horses should be diapered during service, and should wear steel shoes with borium, and rubber pads to cushion the foot. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant Page #2 - Hearts & Tails Horse Drawn Carriage Rides ' r issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends APPROVAL, conditional to: 1. Applicant shall obtain a business permit from the Town Clerk. 2. Provide a copy of a Certificate of Insurance for $1,000,000 to the Town, with the Town to be named as an additional insured. 3. Obtain written permission from property owners for specified stops on private property, including the Stanley Hotel, St. Bartholomew Chruch, and Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church. 4. Submit a revised site plan incorporating the following: â€¢ Signature block: APPROVAL: Approved by the Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees this day of ,2007. John Baudek, Mayor â€¢ Any future additions or revisions to the routes or stops to be approved by Town Staff. â€¢ No signage shall be allowed on public property. â€¢ If traffic conflicts or other use conflicts occur on the streets or at the public stop locations, Town Staff is authorized to restrict operations until the problem is corrected. This is intended to account for accidents, parade routes, periods o f heavy traffic, or other instances of traffic hazards or congestion. â€¢ All horses shall be diapered during times of service. â€¢ Public Drop-off shall be limited to Transit Center and Tregent Park. 5. A copy o f the business license and Special Review permit shall kept with the caniage. Page #3 - Hearts & Tails Horse Drawn Carriage Rides GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 .oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 March 22â€ž 2007 DAVE SHIRL PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Special Review 07-02 - Horse-Drawn Carriage Concession Dear Mr. Shirk: I have no comment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. ~6~Truly Yours, C G .ull ~ Gregg~y A. White GAN Adi v 3 CC: Jerry & Carol Higgason 3406 Claremont Avenue Evans, CO 80620 Page 1Â· of 1 , Dave Shirk From: Greg Sievers Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:16 AM To: Alison Chilcott; Dave Shirk; Julie Roederer Subject: FW: Plan Review Attachments: 1054 Marys Lake Skylar Johnson Variance.doc; Fun City 455 Prospect Village Drive.doc; Grueff-Edwards Lot 4 Stanley Village.doc; Kearney Mini Storage 1360 Brook Drive.doc; Kearney Preliminary Subdivision 1360 Brook Drive (2).doc; McCreery Lane Proposed residence.doc; Lot 4 Grueff-Edwards Sub. 3-22-07.doc Re: Horse drawn carriage - PW has no comments Re: Fun City - PW has no comments, except to reiterate that no on-street parking is allowed on Riverside Drive. Attached please also find PW comments for Gueff-Edwards & Kearney Sub. Greg Sievers Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering P.O. Box 1200 (mail) 170 MacGregor Avenue (shipping) Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586 0 970-586-6909 f 970-227-0437 c gsievers@estes.org http://www.estesnet.com/publicworks/Engineering/default.aspx -----Original Message----- From: Bob Goehring Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:46 AM To: Greg Sievers Subject: Plan Review Utilities Director Bob Goehring TOWN OF ESTES PARK P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3580 bgoehring@estes.org 3/26/2007 râ€¢ , 11@ TOWN-Of {SE PARK Community Development Department RECEIVED ON MAR 13 2007 TO: All Affected Agencies CDOT241*t,D.150286#90 FROM: Dave Shirk, Planner II 970-577-3729, dshirk@estes.org SUBJECT: Horse-Drawn Carriage Concession Downtown Estes Park DATE: March 9,2007 Enclosed please find an application for a Special Review 07-02 for the above-referenced ' property. This request was submitted by Hearts & Tails Carriage Co. Jerry & Carol Higgason and will be considered by the Estes Valley Planning Commission on April 17, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the Town Hall, 170 ~ MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. â„¢m~~~~~~ Pl~hh submit any comments (FAX # 970-586-0249) you may have regarding this P#*414S~ as soon as possible, but no later than March 23,2007. You are always welcome to attend this meeting. NOTE: Please send a copy of your comments to the applicant or his/her agent at the address or FAX number shown below: Jerry & Carol Higgason 3406 Claremont Avenue blo (0Â¥17 fhtwe . Evans, CO 80620 FAX: ~u- ci_ 4 0Â£ - C 2-9-- Email: c3jhigg@msn.com U door Acco55 3/14 1 Enclosures 107 P.O. BOX 1200 â€¢ 170 MACGREGOR AVENUE â€¢ ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 PHONE, BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICE: 970-577-3735 â€¢ FAX 970-586-0249 PHONE, PLANNING OFFICE: 970-577-3721 â€¢ FAX 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com/Comniv f i 1 01 Hearts and Tails Carriage Company 3406 Claremont Ave. Evans, Colorado 80620 970-330-0140 February 17, 2007 Letter of Intent: To whom it may concern, Hearts and Tails Carriage Company is a privately held company owned by Jerry and Carol Higgason of Evans, Colorado. We have been in the carriage business for 3 years. We are insured by Goetz Insurance of Ft. Morgan, Colorado. During this time we have done numerous events including weddings, graduation parties, proms, open house celebrations, community events, and charity benefits. We have been involved with horses for over 40 years and added driving horses to our resume 5 years ago. We throughly enjoy helping people make memories with our carriage 4 business. Our business consists of two carriages, a white surrey that will seat 2-3 people, a black vis-a-vis which seats 4-6 people. We also have a hay wagon and 2 covered wagons. We own a variety of horses, including a team of belgians, a team of spotted drafts, a percheron, and a black & white paint. We have driven tlie horses in large crowded events and they are traffic safe on city streets. Our horses are well broke and extremely friendly. We use bun bags to catch the inanure to ensure we leave a clean environment. At this time we are interested in applying for a permit to give carriage rides in Estes Park from May 2007 to May 2008. We would primarily work weekends but, would love to be included in special events, like parades, or community events. We always use a professional approach to our business to ensure our customers are satis fied and enjoy their experience with us. We believe in maintaining the safety of our customers and our horses. Hearts and Tails Carriage Company would love to have the opportunity to give carriage rides in Estes Park this year, we believe that we could be an assest to your com.munity and provide a wonderful service to your patrons. - , I. C~- 7134:11,Â£--1 1'' ~1' Sincerely, 4 ! 1 t:1 FIER " 4 w.,C\:~ Jerry and Carol Higgason - - 4, : ,$,,"t '' V ... if i ESTES VALLEY 1 8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLIC~,iON .1 1 1 : 't b 1 4 15 1 i.'~L. 8 9 1 9007 i#,1 4/,1 M - Subm ittal Date: Type of Application i- Development Plan r- Boundary Line Adjustment Condom inium Map r Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map F Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change E Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map E Final Subdivision Plat K other: pleqse specify r Minor Subdivision Plat WorSâ‚¬ bu,lAJA CAÂ«-1 416 E Amended Plat General Information Project Name Project Description Project Address Legal Description Parcel ID # Section Township Range Site Information Total Development Area (acres) Existing Land Use ~ Proposed Land Use Existing Water Service f- Town C Well E Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service E Town E Well E Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD r UTSD E Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD E UTSD F Septic Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes E No Existing Gas Service r Xcel F Other F None Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes E No Has site staking been completed? r Yes E No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person ..31g-A-q De- fav-0 6 4/19 (SDA Mailing Address 8406 Clart,4,4 Avt Evensi 63Â· 80610 Attachments Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) ' Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which ~ ~ may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 PIG Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev 11111 Primary Contact Person is X Owner E Applicant C Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) ...Jâ‚¬-R.R,~ anal Cq v- 6 C 1-1 i 174 SD 4 Mailing Address 340 6 ClerÂ·emord- EAns , Co. 906Â£10 Phone 970-330-0/90 Cell Phone 4.-] 0- 480 - 1-71 31> Fax Email 4,3 J N igg - @ Fn & A) . Corn . r Applicant 3*~.Â© De LAYb C- 1* ic~ci,dsor\ ( gy-13 4 n 4 73 9 6 Mailing Address <3qo 6 61Â«tâ€¢no 4-f -Ave, EvOn.s , 66 . C.,qggm j.j Co 2) Phone 970-33 0 -0 1 V O 80,10 Cell Phone 9 70 - 430 - 17 1 S Fax Email (13 3.- blitll @ M 6/0 <01),n - ConsultanVEngineer Mailing Address Phone . Cell Phone Fax Email APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/Com Dev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. i '.1 1 4 ~~4 f -t~t Names: 1/ ir. Â· 1 ~Ij:t ': 1 FEB 3 1 9907 1:8 ill, 4/:..3 Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: h : , Ill/3 ' !] Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Record Owner Date Applicant Date Contact Information . . C APPLICANT CERTIFICATION * I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. * In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/Com Dev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. * The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. , 4 â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. ~ I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Jg \00 /00 \ Names: - Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: .320tg +;miD as o N Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Record Owner Date Applicant Date 11'jfht :f:-1 V I . C.. .1 .i N,, NI h \P! It 1 1 f 11 41 t'. ~ : tf,Â·f i 1 .h' --r il j Â·')!11 1 : id I: 1 1 1 41 Ft[; A. 1 a.uu/ 1/P, 1,â€¢ . fr #t f' '/M ' '.' 6.341 .-2 1 iI 1, 11 , Revised 10/13/06 11 1 rÂ¥ 4 4 . 111 8, 3.1 e, f Fl . i_ J ne, , 0 Â·Â· . :El & 1/ liaL 44 4 ... R. ti ': '. f p Lur /75 -933 It 41 1 4, Aâ€¢* 2 1.: 1 m. /9 '- : 1 J . D .. , . 4. -0 2/11 : ff]11 4-At..2 .Â·~ . Â® . 4-'.:pir..io/Â»51.4 . 4 - ..., 4Â£~ d. 4-; U J.Ii , *4' Asl,t ~.-~ ~ I , .*- M-~:- -----: ,/ g.0 1 i.>4 Ii'...il i ' /31 1 .9 0 . . - 4 1 t I E . 0 1 . . / 0 01. . . . 0 11 .. 0 Â¥. I. . 0 1 . 2 -2- - -' â€¢ ~ VA .r. :7 0 0 2%. 0 ., .. 1 1 ~te. e.. . i.1 IL I.-3 : -- 0-TEL, .... ./. e" -- c.p _.. _~a~tr: 14 1 3 A. 1,1.1 1 . m. ~ 31 . 4/2. R . '10 5 E .0 0 1-.! 1 2. i i 9 C , , -0 . 3!. 4 , 0 1 31 . 4 0 1 i I. - 0 . Â¥ 2. 0 70 . 'i I . 8 ' e < <-' I. I . 5. 8 ,/ I .' m . I 2 9 0 .... // ./ .. . 7. . 0 . M D g SE . 0 . 0 . I. . .. e 14 0/ 0 -. 12 4 5 . // , I .g I .. ...F 3, , '3 3 i . 4,0 04:. 3 g. I / 1 A| 0. s. 0 0. I OIl 7 1 S - , w I O - 0 0.. 1 t . i & :r . .1 liu 8 ~.1 1 ... ... 0 . \4 1 0.8 2.al:.2 4 g '4 - . I. I MI i :.i . ... .97./ % C 0./... I . a., I O -- . 1/ t, 79 m : . 28 e . ... . . . - 8, 4 ... â€¢ ...,e ... . '1-1/:1: , r \ e g - 2 4 .. & 1 , 0 - ~:& " 434 ':â€¢ 4 0 00 . 8 68,82 . GU '11 t -! S i 8 4 J . . .e t. D - 0 0 - -. , . ... . C 6-- . F. 4 %10 . .0 ...6-- . 0 . 1 2 e 0.' S ' , t. . /0 0 9 : r I. &10-~ 4 5, 2 2 : 2- 4-1~1 1.: 3 E- 2. L ... .. , .. t. a & 0 2 . . 1 r. I 0 1 0 4'.4 /:: 911 .1, m . 5 0 2.' . 9- .. I - & 'Trâ€žueâ€¢ . m . I :t i -1 7 - 11 --- 0 : 4 . . m . .1 - 0 0 -. 4 e . .. . V .Â· .- 6- S 7713 2357* . - . 2 + . 6 ..E . t. . : 6 ..4 11.. . 1.1 3.1 : e . . : . 0 -~4 2 11 94 1 .1. ., . e/:Z , .' N. 0 & I . 4.. t: B 1/1 4 .... ' I . .,. . 45 41 41 3 -14 - Ir 1 1. 3/0 k. 4 0 . .. . 26:91.7. m .:~ 8 Â·5 3 ' : . 8. - 6 : P.. . EN . 1 . 8 2, P 9 1 41'111 S . 3,8{ 8.::.6 /50: ,, NA.i . Egg: .. . 9 1 1 ' . 24 . U Q . . I . Â«1, 0 1- 7-7.. 41't- . . 2 e - 1.1 i: ,) 1 8. ..P.. 1 .. Ae, e,; cs Fo.. 6 :ClÂ·. eL 9 - .0 : 4 . .. .,1 - t.'E + E .I e 8 - : 4 3. 6 3 y..:.l:P.... M..nfb: D Â° 4 - 1 , i. ill. t. , ... el .. . 1.- I *: i. M 1 1... 1 4\: ./1, . . -7 : .. r 41 .g?g.1 3.. - C . . 0 - 1 14 .11 0 0 eD,*, N le, k.: b A 9 :g 4- 1 ....2- . ... 0 8, " . 0 U ' 11 -119 . . . 2 . I f -0 : . , i. . 6 2 1 4 - 0. I + ./ .. 0 '7 le d g.. . ; .3 hhi 4, 3 i yer 11 Cil , 1' ' 4 . 0 4 6 .F . e 3 1, t.. , 1 , Â· 2. . .. . .a .t. B S. 4 1: , 2 .,2 ... 0 - e... e f - go ' 71- 9 E.. .1 1 . 1 . 4 .. .1 .1/ 1 â€žIC) . . â€¢ 1 0 .4 .... .. 5 1 0 .e 1 .. E ...12 ity ,- $ . I . e./ 10 ;1' i d 'i . I 9 I 1 1/ 0 77 , 2 -I >3*5 -~ , i 21 4 , 8 & NE 'SU. - .1 '9. 8 1 0 - se -0. 2 . . B â€¢I â€¢â€¢ - 3 ... 0. ' . M 1 or--r--*-- 3 . , %'. 1 .i' e. E Â·~ * % 1 N: W i. g Â· '7 . 0 i. 1/.t-J- : --- 4/: O-0.0 O -- - --~El E i â‚¬ F. 18 & E I & :f ..: ... R b . I P 0,4,. -' '.9 5, :- ,1 ' 2 .0 4 .../4 a. 1 = 1, kity. S *t Â° N % 63: & 3- .tlti.../. . 1 C-0 277 ks \\ . M ./ &: . 7 -7-71-7 /FrL j ~k-j 121 Â« yd/Â·42â€ž':I,. 4~ & f 0..1 4 P-134*'Aâ€ž 5--li- . , /..1/ k â€¢-.4 1 0 .â€¢1.0-- J.â€¢4 el 1 4 1 i D . A. . 1 ./.1 1 1 1 1 â€¢.~ 4 , 2 ./ l.l - r N - 1~/ W 6 - lc 14 ..1-1,>A,; â‚¬ .lei?.:1)1 . .1 0 21/ , -1#1) '01 Â· /1/ U~ & m QI j/. 4, 1 9 4, Â· 2':Â·b .9?%.(ef 1 2.4 2 #e 5 - . u"2 7..Rk, G- coger M ..aol 0 S 3& 831â€¢â€¢as WIHIC' . .... 9@700 9 en 0 ..0. .3 HArt ./.3 I * -~ Stanley Heights Amended Plat ~ Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 - Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: April 17,2007 REOUEST: Formally combine a portion of one lot into an existing lot. LOCATION: 920 and 1000 West Lane, within unincorporated Larimer County. ~ - n,n*n, r-4 / /l 1 \5% ! 1 -1 - I OWNERS: Don and Elizabeth Stewart, Ed 6 Uy/02.9"/ Grueff 1 -'.0 .. cm-L. 19!'~ Ax:ky " . ~,bunt~in USFS *tional Fa,k It .. APPLICANT/ADDRESS: Ed Grueff (3225 Devils Gulch Road, Estes Park, CO --=./ - l. S 80517) - La f'? 24 n- nn I USFS RA/- 1 DC BoL.>c.y STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying (Mike Todd/Jes Reetz), 586-2458 Parcel Number: 3523315056m 3523315057 Development Area: 9.01 acres Number of Lots: TWO Existing Land Use: Single-family residential Proposed Land Use: Same Existing Zoning: "RE" Rural Estate (2.5 acre) Adjacent Zoning- East: "RE" Rural Estate North: "RE" Rural Estate West: "RE" Rural Estate South: "RE" Rural Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Single-family residential North: Single-family residential West: Single-family residential South: Single-family residential Services- Water: Town Sewer: Septic Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer râ€¢ . PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: In 1974, Lot 28 of Stanley Heights was split in half, with the north half going to Lot 27 and the south half going to Lot 29. However, this was never formalized with an amended plat, which was required after the adoption o f the 1968 Larimer County subdivision regulations. This amended plat will combine former Lots 27 and 28 into a single lot o f record, and return Lot 29 to its original size and shape. This plat does not create any additional building sites. In addition, this plat does not create any non-conforming lots, and all building and septic systems meet required property line setbacks. REVIEW CRITERIA: This proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision ofpublic services. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. Pursuant to C.R.S.30-28-110, sub-section 4(a), "no plat for subdivided land shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners unless at the time of the approval of platting the subdivider provides the certification of the county treasurer' s office that all ad valorem taxes applicable to such subdivided land, for years prior to that year in which approval is granted, have been paid." 2. This proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 4. Within sixty (60) days of the Board's approval of the amended plat, the developer shall submit the final plat for recording. If the amended plat is not submitted for recording within this sixty-day time period, the approval shall automatically lapse and be null and void. 5. This is a Planning Commission recommendation the Board of County Commissioners; Page #2 - Stanley Heights Amended Plat I , Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Amended Plat of Lots 27,28, and 29 Stanley Heights. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed amended plat to the Board of County Commissioners with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and authorization for the chair to sign the plat when the conditions are met and the plat is presented for signature. DENIAL: 1 move to recommend DISAPPROVAL of the proposed amended plat to the Board of County Commissioners because... (state reason for denial - findings), Page #3 - Stanley Heights Amended Plat , GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 March 22,2007 DAVE SHIRL PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Amended Plat - Stanley Heights, Lots 27,28 & 29 4 Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Dedication Statement dedicates perpetual public easements for the installation and maintenance of utilities for drainage facilities. There are no easements indicated on the Plat. However, I note that there is an overhead power line that runs along the south and west sides of the proposed Lot 29A. An easement should be dedicated for this overhead power line as it appeafs that it crosses the proposed Lot 29A for the benefit of the proposed Lot 27A. 2. The 50-foot building setback shown on the Amended Plat should be removed on the Final Amended Plat. If you have any questions, ple~~o not ~sitate to give me a call. ~ N t:&"I.4*Youss n L ~ Gre*ty A. White GAW/ld~ CC: Cornerstone Engineering, Jes Rettk Fax: 970/586-2459 03/26,/2007 08:43 9704986772 LARIMER HLTH AND ENV PAGE 02/02 A LARIMER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 1525 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80524-2004 General Health (970) 498-6700 Environmental Health (970) 498-5775 Fax (970) 498-6772 To: Dave Shirk, Town of Estes Park From: Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Planner *3*\ Date: March 26,2007 Subject: Stanley Heights Lots 27,28,& 29 Amended Plat This amended plat would adjust the property line between the two residential lots. Both are developed with homes that are connected to public water through the Town, and individual on-site septic systems. The result of the amended plat will be an enlargement of the property at 1000 West Lane to include all of Lots 27 and 28. ' The property at 920 West Lane would become smaller, and contain the original Lot 29. The main issue of concern for our office would be to ensure that this smaller lot was adequate to incorporate the septic system. I checked our files and could not locate the original septic permit. The project description submitted by Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. does not that all buildings and septic systems meet the required property line setbacks. This lot will contain 2.98 acres. This would satisfy our concerns for this amended plat. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. I can be reached at 498-6777 if there are questions prior to the hearing. COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LARIMER ~COUNTY Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer Tb DATE: March 23,2007 SUBJECT: Stanley Heights Subdivision Amended Plat of Lots 27,28 and 29 920 and 1000 West Lane Proiect Description/Background: This is a request for an amended plat. In 1974 Lot 28 was split in half between Lot 27 and 29. This amended plat would combine Lots 27 and 28 into one single lot and return Lot 29 to its original platted state. No new lots will be created and the submitted information states that accesses to West Lane will not be impacted. Comments: 1. We expect that the existing drainage patterns in the area will not be altered. If drainage patterns are going to be changed, a drainage plan should to be submitted for review and approval. 2. Notification and approval from the proper utility authorities is required for any utility easements that are being modified in association with the proposal. 3. It does not appear that any existing access points will be impacted due to this proposed request. Recommendation: As long at the comments listed above are noted, our department has no objections to the approval of this submittal of this proposal. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5701 or e-mail at tdowns @larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Cornerstone Engineering 1692 Big Thompson Ave, Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 reading file file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\Stanley Heights AP lots 27,28,29.doc COM-M]TTED-TO-EXCEr[ENCE i Water Department ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum -~WATER To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 3/19/2007 Re: Stanley Heights Lots 27,28 & 29 Stanley Heights 920 & 1000 West Lane The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Application for an amended plat for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) All existing easements pertaining to Power must remain intact. After review of the Amended Plat the Water Department has no comments. 03/16/2007 FRI 15:45 FAX 970 586 4544 UPPER THOMPSON SAN DIST 0001/001 Upper Thompson Sanitation Disttict PO Box 568 Estes Pail[, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 Matrh 15, 2007 Dave ShiIk PlannerII Town of Estes Pat* P.O. Box 1200 Estes Patk, CO 80517 Ref: Stanley Heights Lots 27,28, 86 29 Lots 27,28, & 29, Stanley Heights 920 & 1000 West Lane Dear Dave, We have mviewed the applicalion for the Amended Plat for thee above-mferenced property. The District has no objection to the Amended Plat Thank you for yourthne. Sincerely, AC-*640 Reed W. Smcdley v Lines Superintendent UpperThompson Sanitation INS tlict CC Van Hom Engineering Joe coop Post-itÂ® Fax Note 7671 oate 3-5- 67 &16, C 1043 Fish Cmek Road Estes Paik, CO 80517 ' tbaÂ»- SULâ€žt. =184 SHEUV Fax: 970-586-8101 w-Liba-~Ed ~ 1.Yr MD Phone # Phone # le- 4 /4 4 Fax # 6 -6 149 ._.jed 049 Fax# , Water Department ,Â·~ ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum ~~~~ATER To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 3/19/2007 Re: Stanley Heights Lots 27,28 & 29 Stanley Heights 920 & 1000 West Lane After review of the Amended Plat the Water Department has no comments. r' C-1 b Â¢ CORN*~ Estes Park, CO 80517 1692 Big Thompson - Suite 200 Phone: (970) 586-2458 Fax: (970) 586-2459 mÂ«H!=RING & /G. \ SU~EYING, INC 4 4 t' ]:i A~Â· t'i, , e ':,1;1, 4 r February 21, 2007 .2â‚¬ Aly FEB 2 1 2007 . i 1 Â·il .' 111 4 1: i iii . 141 :19 j 4 6 Mr. Bob Joseph 1 Community Development Director Town ofEstes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter of Intent for the "Amended Plat Lots 27,28 & 29, Stanley Heights" Parcels Number 35233-15-056 and 35233-15-057. Dear Bob, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of our clients Ed Grueff and the Stewart, D and E, Trust are pleased to submit the "Amended Plat ofLots 27,28 & 29, Stanley Heights". Owners/Lien Holders The current owner ofLot 27 and the North M ofLot 28 is currently Stewart, D and E, Trust. The current owner ofLot 29 and the South 1/2 ofLot 28 is currently Lot4ED, LLC. Adiacent Zoning Current zoning ofthe subject property is "RE" Residential. Surrounding properties are also zoned RE- Residential Proiect Description In 1974 Lot 28 Stanley Heights was split in two equal parts, with the north half going to Lot 27, and the south half going to Lot 29. This Amended Plat will combine former Lot 27 and 28 into one single lot and return Lot 29 to its original platted state. This plan does not create any additional lots or building sites. In addition, this plan does not create any non-conforming lots, all buildings and septic systems meet required property line setbacks. Access Driveways accessing the sites use are off of West Lane. No driveway encroachments are existing or created with this plan. râ€¢ 0 0 Utilities Utility services are provided as follows: Water Town ofEstes Park Electric Town ofEstes Park Gas Excel Sewer Septic No utility service or main extension is required for this plan. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sin~rely, /7 tni 1 / r 93 - Jes Reetz . 4 Senior Draftsman ,-. 1.- h 1; 2.-'-~0 N 2 3.1 .7 7.7 :3.-1... ESTES VALLEY 1 1 Al].-11.. Ir... DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION JL, / FEB 2 1 9007 111 1, -Submittal Date: / 4 111 f E Development Plan E Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map IT'; Special Review E ROW or Easement Vacation rl Preliminary Map F Rezoning Petition 13 Street Name Change IT Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat El Time Extension r Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify 13 Minor Subdivision Plat g Amended Plat General Information Project Name Amencted Plcer, Lo-t5 27 28+29 51-an /ey tte,~h-r Project Description Rep lcd 04 3 tots j c receÂ·Fi~1 2 L o f 5 Project Address 92.0 + (000 \,46+ LCk-ne-, A 61Â·es Pdk, 6.0 805(7 Legal Description ZON 23 2.8 + 29 5-1-~n tey Hâ‚¬(~ it+3 Parcel ID #625192-05-027, 061,029 Section 19 Township S-/V Range 7.2 W Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 9.0 ! Existing Land Use Re,5 ident k 1 Proposed Land Use Residentk C Existing Water Service K Town 13 Well 17 Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 4(Â·Town 1- Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD E UTSD K Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD r UTSD Dt Septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes FÂ¢. No Existing Gas Service r xcel F Other F None Existing Zoning R E- Fes i clen +l'CA l Proposed Zoning NA Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? F Yes K No Has site staking been completed? F- Yes IT No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person 465 Reel-z- Mailing Address /692- Bic~ 1-homptorL Ave,. 6uite. 200 3 Est-et> Tick, 60 Attachments W Application fee 1~ Statement of intent R 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan I~ 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan 10 Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park + P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue Â·a Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev Type of Application 1 0 6 1 - Primary Contact Person is 13 Owner IIi Applicant g ConsultanUEngineer Record Owner(s) 6+ HED, ALL 1 40 24 6<wiff Mailing Address 3225 .Pet/1 15 6*kA Fal. Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Ed GraÂ£.47 Mailing Address 3225- 1*0/ /5 & 16* Rel. Eetes llck, L O SOS ll Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Consultant/Engineer Cornerstone- 6-,jineer ing #Ad 5(krve-y i,~3 j IRE. Mailing Address /692. 8,t, 760â€¢npbovl *2. 5Â«ite- 200 Phone (970) 596- 2459 Cell Phone Fax(370) 586-2459 Email j feet-2 Q ce,5 - 666. Cor,Â·u APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDeWSchedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1,2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. Gn Tel' c.=..1 U.:2.i 0 11 .7 EFN rF~ 1 f i (74, 1,96 " -:Â·' t.'F:~ i] b. '- Ii'.,Â·.*f \1'1 I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have beâ‚¬IA~r~t~F-" ; 1 1.4 ' 41 1 34 4. '. 1 6 .1 D Names: 11Plj FEB 21 2007 ~~ ~~ 89? Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Ed, 6 r(A.20/ c.#C ~ a ~~-- - .-1, .rt --1 N tiL &- 1 Applicant PLEASE PRINT: R (j G AAC 44 a -......Lâ€ž..2.1 . n..=./...<Ilii'.--*2=.=d IRecord Owner 76 329-~-A / . Date 2-/4-07 Applicant Â«-i,21-Arlt Date 41-/9--07 /V Contact Information C , APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge ~ and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. ./- I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). * I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. I I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. h The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. . â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. â€¢ l acknowledge that l have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Elci & r GLE. 4241 Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Ed- 6-,fu_ctÂ¥ Signatures: Record Owner Â«.a- 94â€ž_ p.( Date J - 1 0-0 0.67 Date 0 -11-15"1 07Â·=-tÂ·-, . -- .. - ,: n r' re~ C-~ lig jil DA~ FEB 2 1 2007 12 M i 1 I .1 4 1 . 2, -9 1 1 '.4 6 3 :, i! 1 0 j Revised 10/13/06 02/20/2007 18: 26 97057-~0.80 ESTES PARK REA47 PAGE 02/03 . 1 CL- Primary Contact Person is r Owner F Applicant M Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) Stewa ff , 17 + E g .Truer Mailing Address, |000 U,/2 6+ LAAE Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Applicant Ed 634(Â£'#f Mailing Address 3225- Av//5 6,4 k.k 124. Es*s grk, to 802(7 Phone Cell Phone Fax Email Consullant/Engineer Cor nerstorte. A.19211Â£â‚¬ring *Ad .:56~rve-yi/19 , .TAC Mailing Address /6 92 8,9 -1-hopppovt *e. 5Â«ile ,At>6 Phone 0770) 596 - 62 959 4..._. fÂ·Â·UO - - :-P:-1 .~ -. .7 Ap--3 r---0 j Ht M [96 -- r c.=:1.... C;. 11.-.1.1 0 , 1 Cell Phone 14 'u lif- 1 1 -1----r-7.- r 4 -1,4. U Fax(970) 586 -24 59 Ik lili 1.1 , 7 4 4 .1, 1 0 4 1 111 Email j raâ‚¬,-tz &2 Â£25 - 6,6. COr,U * 4 41 rttl Z 1 Loui :.1 2,4 -Maiu j k t--Am" 11 1 0 APPLICATION FEES ~ ...2 - For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limlts See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. Al[ requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bi[101-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats. Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be giveh 30,days prior to the first heaMng on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: D *22â€žJECONÂ·774.91-, 1)on b. Ond E?/206Â£#1 A J'tal*r/,+MAZE - Applicant PLEASE PR/NT.Â· ' Inatures: Record Owner 4 'A 1-% 40_4*L 0-~440)#V Des .-wpol 07 r 9 14161.u I -12 j / i Date Applicant -Contactinformation 02/20/2007 18:26 9705770080 ESTES PARK REALTY_ PAGE 03/03 ' ; 0, - APPLICANT CERTIFICATION $ I hereby certify that the Information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application l am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property- IÂ· In submitting the appljcation materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). * I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) 4 I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC â€¢ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. $ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper Identification access to my property during the review of this application. * I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT: <bLE Jit.actliuil. 100144- Elizablk A .dj-tujadi -lrultus . Applicant PLEASE PR/NTÂ· Signatures: A **026, , Record Owner 000Â£ 03,09-- '4 *k akt-k 5.~4~44;f Date 44-/6 7 <2 Applicant Date #-h TED ,Â·: 7...~ -; ,~ ~Â· .; :Â·~ .~* â€ž 7' 503Â·, 1 *1\ 1/A; : .~, ~ ~-, H 24 19 g li ag-*< 4 , 31': ; 4 J H li t! f-:4, 4 3 - ~fi iii FEB 9 1 ?Ani i 111 6.0 Ur 4 1 .1 1 .1 d.-2 j. ) 3 I ; 64 L ; ~ L 4=.0 3 e 11 1 1 i Revised 10/13/08 I . 0 0 00 N :9 0080 OOCD 000000 00(9 00002 4-422<2 2 -Y-ex -E m 0 & m m co. 0- 0- 0- 2/92 iliwwmawwm 00%[80 220=31 0 0 0 (055 0 ge=22~ 38*1=9~9 22=E -05.-8C2 **Â·05<W-fed.@2.c 2* 2 0 0 5 r, Â®&3x x O.xrlfxo ILI[Zojem if) H 00Zmoo~mz 6=maep *5*aS0QC8828 00 N Q. O- 00 0- O - h ts 1- P 2 E .[g (D OC a) CO Co z 00 r 0 0 N * m -t O 0 C gz /5 19 0 -0 21= 8.9 EgE= &g = 2,= B 2 v c 2 5 1- SE8EE Imâ‚¬2=aâ‚¬@12 E .e 2 5 8 0 2 c c 2 8 02 2 1 -2 â‚¬ 2 8 0 6 m $ m r â‚¬ RE Â¥ 8 hi & g m m JL 00~0.13,me -ii-,-1<0-'J,God:zeD Revocable Trust Estes Park, O 80517 Richard F. & Saundra B. Brown, Co-Trustees Estes Park, O 80517 2~J:o~g~non is ulch Road Estes Park, O 80517 Estes Park, O 80517 Estes Park, O 80517 Estes Park, O 80517 Atkins Ferriss, Saint Loui MO 6 3124 Estes Par 80517 iessen 80517 k, O 80517 aska 80517 y & Leslie Van Der Well eder stes P , CO 80517 Iliam & Associates Investment Co. 75 Manhattan Drive, #208 ulder, CO~38003517 Owner 11 dress City, State, Zip hjagfemIn Family Trust Jeoffrey J. Schageman Family Trust 75201 ckwood Estes P 0517 62â‚¬ sjol leld pulv SIH Xelums Robert Mebane Jones Rogers lona P. Zittrauer hards, Trustee 7 rry L. & Francis E AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 27,28 AND 29 STANLEY HEIGHTS LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4, SECTION 19, TON, R72W OF THE *b P.M. -0.-Mq-. ......%.---1-t..,--1 113 ,/ 07 t-D.-- :1331 1 3, COUNTY OF IARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO t.44.-i /==r- - ..1-1 .-.-.9.-'........1.=. ]11 0~ I i?, - -0.-::.:s...-'~J-t_--=5***~0' 1 1 1 I /L 68 15 T I -0 m-- ...1 N -.15 Guu. 0, . 19 10 11 1 2121 22 23 --77910 ~ 0111 I ZI U 0,1 r -- le /7 46 15 1 I .... Â°' 1 : 42 j- 20 rif 6 0 L . 5,~@K. 00. 10. 13 22 '|RAC ~ 08 h.1 : i.,1, 4, 7.1 1 0, 11.12.13 1. 15 E-i- : * 10 11 LOT 26 20 - E-Ii- ' 0, W' 30 -.,-* N STANLEY HEIGHTS LOT 43 . 18 1, iâ€¢ re 1 05 Inj-3717.~ . 04 7-I=z_ 07 . 51 05 LOT 8 RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE FOUND #6 STANLEY HEIGHTS 22= N . 20.27 37 31 50 0 50 100 150 STANLEY HEIGHTS REBAR NEANRE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE FOUND #6 .32 - . 20 -41' ..01â„¢ . 62 04 43 34 RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ~ ~ FENCE POST REBAR NEAR c o, of 58 35 01 38 SCALE 1" = 50' 1 1 FENCE POST 35.38 2 3; 30 a l 3 54 02 147.55' (M) 4-- LU 22 - TRACT A " 11 37 1 07. 00 02. 01. 01 7//7 //// r /////7//7//7 / /// r /////7///// 7 //////////////// (9\ 1 / 20 11 1 06 05 04 03 LEGEND _ --- - -73-7--1 -89~07#5~ 2-5,2.11 *)-50'------------7/' 1 09 23 22 17 Â· 01 / 25.27.20 2.21 --- -UNLITY & 1 S 89'04' E 541.03' (P) BU/LDING 10 1 44 29 32 01 09 01 SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE N 04'lrooNE-_ DFOUNAGE -1 SETBACK 03.10 01 20 -- -- ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE FOUND #6 ~ -DISEMÂ¥NT (TYPJ *71-m.r. 02 . 15 1, 31 19 01 REBAR - ~ 23.94' (M) 1 1.1 ,~ 15. 17 C 02 -------- -EASEMENT LINE A _~ 1~ ~ 11 ~ '.4 2. as 90.07 0, 03 5 e - â€¢Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· FOUND MONUMENTATION (AS NOTED) ~ FOU~ID #6 01 le 01 04 12. 01 04 REF \ \ 9 -Â»# C-,A' 15 4),, SET #5 REBAR W/ ALUMINUM N 88'53'08" W \ 6&11 , 1&![65'/ 14 4 , 'i 0, 16 02 11 : . 01. /77213 CAP, PLS #29415 50.60' 00 241 0 U 18 (P)Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· DENOTES PLATTED DIMENSION / ~ ~ . \ ~ -2 4 02 08 07.15 1 1 1 / r ,~"~~~ IE) o Pria . 23 - W 00 1.-7- 1% (M> Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· DENOTES MEASURED DIMENSION - L Â· 1 \ EXISTING 1/ 8 ,-. A. ./ a--T 02 . 3 O -73TS--15#-.Le,------,O 4 r.7.4 50 1 (C)Â· + Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· DENOTES CALCULATED DIMENSION v -- 1 \ LOT 27 & I I b LOT 7 1 \ 4 1--- N. 1/2 LOT 28 / 0 VICINITY MAP STANLEY HEIGHTS - LOT 42 SCALE 1"=1000' GENERAL NOTES: RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ~ .lu 1 - ~/~ Â·4<456 ACRES (EXISTING) . /N STANLEY HEIGHTS / RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DEDICATION STATEMENT - 1 0 . ....r- .. 1) Boundary lines indicated on this map are adjustments of .* / Known all men by these presents that the undersigned being the owners of the adiCirmYnt,12notecrea~tehaedfiT,Oyld;ptrebuik~regor~ites;fohr / .--- / following described property, to-wit: 1 1 2 i any purposes. The are added to each lot shown hereon by *1 ----4 1 such adjustment is to be considered an addition to, shall 7 6 kg, become a part of, and shall be conveyed together with, each ~ ' <- / 1000 West Lane IN THE W 1 /2 SECTION 19, T5N, R72W LOTS 27, 28 & 29 STANLEY HEIGHTS / 4 4/- - - OF THE 60 P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO lot as shown. -- Ww/ ~- FOUN~ /6 REBAR | ~ Containing 8.999 acres more or less; hove by these presents caused the same to be BASIS OF BEARING: PROPOSED / surveyed and plotted as shown on this map to be known as the Amended Plat of The basis of bearing for this survey is the East - - LOT 27A Lots 27, 28 and 29, Stanley Heights, and do also dedicate to the public perpetual g Line of Lots 27, 28 & 29, Stanley Heights, from j 101 261,620.900* S.F. (PROPOSED) FOUND 3/4* STEEL r, easements for the installation and maintenance of utilities and for drainage the Northeast property corner of said Lot 27 ~ UnLIT,1 & facilities as are laid out and designated on this map. (#6 rebar) to the Southeast property corner of - DRAINAGE 6.006* ACRES (PROPOSED) ROD LIES 0.21 ' *EST j ~ th, 0 - D & E STEWART TRUST said Lot 29 (#6 rebar) and plotted as bearing \ EASEMENT OF PROPERTY 1.INE Â£51 m S00'56'W. 6 (Trp.) . / 0 < f 1/ FOUND #5 REBAR , m 1.-1 24&:1 1 15 ED m W By: By: W/ ALUM. CAP Z PLS# 9485 WHICH FOUND #5 REBAR LO I LOT 41 Edward Grueff, Manager Don D. Stewart, Trustee UES 2.08' EAST W/ ALUM.\ CAP / @8& STANLEY HEIGHTS 3 ri/N FROM MEASURED PLS# 9485\LIES n ~ / u, M ra RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE 2101 Â· 64 R.a W. 0.32' EAST OF b 33 LOT 6 0. PROPERTY. UNE >i 0 :~ By: STANLEY HEIGHTS -- - -FORMER_LQI_UNE . Elizabeth A, Stewart, Trustee RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ~ *6 1 -- TO BE VACATED - ~ ~ ~2~ - EXISTING S. 0 . - , 50 ~3 1/2 LOT 28 FOUND 1/2Â» PIPE NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE (*- R.a . 2 1.512 ACRES (EXISTING) LIES 0,04' WEST OF PROPERTY ~INE STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS 10' -..-. 15:Z COUNTY OF LARIMER ) FOUND #6 \ DRAINAGE OTILITY & 1/ R 2 REBAR 1 + of , 2007 by EDWARQ-GELLEEE, Manager, Lot*ED, LLC. - - 0 L_ GYP.) ------------------ - -1--EASEMENT - -1- ------ 2~j 1/ 0) - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day Witness my hand and official seal. LOT 5 2 S 89'04'00".1 -56121UCL _ 2 1 N 89'04' W 566.62' (P) My commission pvpirpe STANLEY HEIGHTS ---- I...I-- - I...I I...0 ...il I.Ii,-I- - LOT 40 RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ~ k FOUND /4 REBAR â‚¬7 10' -----37--------7/ STANLEY HEIGHTS r PLASTIC CAP T---- / RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE Notary Public APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT: N 78'49'40" W g & PLS# 9485 WHICH - - - -DRAINAGE -1 * SETBACK UTIUIÂ¥Â· le- BUILDING ~ ~ This final plat has been reviewed and is hereby approved as to form as 53.19' Â§ 0 BEARS S89'04'001/- EASEMENT / (TYP.) # 1. complying with all Current survey requirements of Larimer County and of Z 1 1.74-FEET Â·F*6---; -pJ. - . 1 1 -. 7 State law pertaining to plotting and monumentation. This approval ~ ACi~JAL ~PRNfB /- 7 constitutes neither a warranty by Larimer County concerning such -10 \/ 1 NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE \ compliance, nor a release or indemnity of the subdivider and his surveyor . 1 4 \\gl ~~ --- - STATE OF COLORADO ),SS concerning any noncompliance of this plat with current survey requirements. . 34. C------4 / \ PROPOSED / COUNTY OF LARIMER ) ' D.te: i __--F_-_- 78 0~>s 920 West Lane,LOT 29A , 2~' -- .1 30,309,150* S.F. (PROPOSED) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2007 by Don D. & Elizabeth A. Stewart. trustees, D & E /1 .Colorado P.L.S. No. ~ *99,1 :E ACRES (PROPOSED) 4 Stewart Trust. (Signature) *12 4 Witness my hand and official seal. N N .1.arimer County Engineering Department ~ -:1:|P; Â· Â· 1/ My commission expires (Printed Name) *~ ' |~ LOT 39 110' STANLEY HEIGHTS EXISTING U'NLITY & ~' RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE Notary Public SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE FOUND #6 - LOT 29 REBAR -1 .. DR)AINAGE --4 1 - - 1 -738. ACRES- (EX1STIN~k' Â· -64*EMENT \ / HErcERUCHATT~IsILOTpu~33rrs'E, Ilro 29, 0 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL: REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO - (TYPÂ·) 1 / 15 STANLEY HEIGHTS, TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS il j LOT 4 L-.-------- 4-------------- - - of , 20-. All dedications are hereby accepted on behalf of the OF A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. - _ _ _ -~ / ~ Approved by the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners this -day STANLEY HEIGHTS--~ 1 / itii /1-11-1 t-1-7-9=i iii illi ii i/-1-Fl t--f--t *9/ ; ii#-9Â¤//////l///////lit///////// ~-~~~~,~,,,0/ public. This approval does not constitute acceptance of responsibility by the RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE F FOUND #4 REBAR W/ N 89'04' W 553.77' (P) | County for construction, repair, or maintenance of any streets, highways, alleys, , REG. LAND SURVEYOR #29145 PLASTIC CAP PLS# 9485 N 89'04'00" W 555.70' (M) bridges, rights-of-way or other improvements designate# _on this plat. N 57=53'56Â» W WHICH BEARS S64'30'08Â»E. DATE 62.28' FROM FOUND J 1.66' FROM SET #5 REBAR ~_ FOUND #6 REBAR #4 REBAR PLS#9485 W/ ALUMINIUM CAP PLS LOT 30 - - 151 01-- - #29415 STANLEY HEIGHTS Chair RE- RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ~'fl~ APR 1 1 2~ M ATTEST: . '1.1 .a- L .... t Clerk of the Board : NOTICE OF APPROVAL: 2007 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INt:---COPYRIGHT--ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LARIMER COUNTY HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL: APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLE: AMENDED PLAT PURSUANT TO ARnCLE 68 OF TITLE 24, C.R.S. AS AMENDED. By the Larimer County Health Authority this - day of 20 -. 03/02/07 COMPI FTFNFÂ« COUWFNTS JLR All construction on this subdivision, or any lot therein, including the development 03/19/07 COUNTY SURVEYOR COMMENTS JLR LOTS 27, 28 & 29 STANLEY HEIGHTS 04/05/07 CNTY SURVEYOR COMMENTS DATED 04/02/07 JIR LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY of domestic water, and the provision of sewage treatment, shall be done in a LEGAL ACnON BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN manner which will meet all of the requirements of the Colorado Department of SHEET TITLE: THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT, IN Health, and the Larimer County Public Health Department, and the officers NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS authorized to enforce such requirements. AMENDED PLAT mianiii,ME,im & /~.Em.nqum- .. SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DESIGNED BY --- APPROVED BY _394 P JOB NO. *W.ET SHEET 1002 RIG â„¢Om'SON N~ 6// (97076&6-8458 SUM! 200 DATE OF CERTFICATION SHOWN HEREON. DRAWN BY _JUL-- DATE APRIL 2007 438.002 Larimer County Health Authority 11 CUENT: ED GRUEFF Ims PARK. Co. 80617~~Â§~ m (970) 686-8459 CHECKED BY RE SCALE AS SHOWN M:\CES_Jobs\438_002_Stanley._Heights\Amended_Plot.dwg, 4/10/2007 2:16:35 PM, JLR p. Park School District Observatory ~ Development Plan #07-06 Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue i# PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 17, 2007 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TITLE: "Site Plan for Estes Park Memorial Observatory Located in the SE 44 of Section 29, T5N, R72W of the 6th P.M., County of Larimer, State of Colorado" LOCATION: The site is located at 1600 Manford Avenue on the Park School District campus within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Angels Above Foundation/Park School District CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Wyatt Knudson and Paul Bennett STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a location and extent review of construction on the Park School District campus. The applicant, Angels Above Foundation, plans to build a two-story (approximately twenty-six-foot tall), 2,727-square-foot memorial observatory and donate it to the Park School District for school use. The Angels Above Foundation will lease and operate the building, also opening it up for use by the general public. The foundation has a website at http:Uwww.angelsabove.org, which provides additional information about this nonprofit organization and its plans. , 0 II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels One Parcel Number(s) 25293-00-921 Gross Land Area The entire school campus, includes PID 25293-00-921 and PID 25304-00-909, and is approximately 44 acres. Net Land Area Not provided Zoning "CO" Outlying Commercial Existing Land Use Public School Proposed Land Use Public School and Observatory SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands Yes - Not Near Proposed Construction Streams/Rivers Yes - Fish Creek 100-Year Flood Plain - Not Near Proposed Construction Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Elk Page #2 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 f LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING / -- --2-4..:fm--=-Z--t_ ..22Â§22>/. pANX,#u (fp)2*pl liD UTTLE PROSFEC T MOUNTAN Town ol Esles Pl,k 2 -I'll, 71/'*- 4, < 4 LaKe Estes Pan: i N ~ Â«\ O + M % ./ X Z 42*# 3 2 11 LF,4 .- 1 Park School Lone T ree Vg Ap li District Campus Esl ee Pafk . , batee ParK M =ee K- 5 , Fo~dabon_ - 44 47~4 04'JAft,/ // - LJ J ' " tz:Pts-'402 ... ~:.',+ - -- </- -4#.t f I i , Â«-2-=-z;> -*2725- Â¥ L /1%65 9 3 4 F ' .4 loggafÂ¥ ty-~SEII}m r -] EijaimmorDQ~ 3132] 03,6 410 UI]IEOVF*FFF,GR:Dij'; Presbyeburcrof EP 1 -- ~- ~21% [0[320 malmmi] mm I I Fairgrounds 1 Estes Valley Recreation and Park District Ji~~~~ Facilities ~ ingle- amily Park School Family ~ -~ ~ < , -- District Zoning: RE o mod tions Campus oning: 9-11 Zoning: CO n~ly Church - onin : R -1 i I -7 Page #3 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 , AERIAL PHOTOS --r-lae, 75 .'ll 2 :,fs , 06 . . . 0 41 Â· t .1 ,/ i. . ffi<â€¢i , $1.-C=t 2 c i Manford.Av- 4-9 ': 9- ' . '3 9 het# 8.1- 1 1 .M . - 1 .11 1 - , r.-{ I , WATI' 7., ~:, ; High / ,. . A -VI _ School Et * r .~,~,e ~ . ...U . â€¢,5,24 '- Y ' 1 . 4%6~ZC 14 -r\.1 '11#- (. 2" 1 2.-4/W~t ),di , /40 4 7: re Â· ~ Â· ~t; - './. " F. 4 E 'r I ................ . PÂ¥. A. 1. I 0- I//A< "'* - 04. .!1, 4 t. ' -1.ii; CO 1. .... II .'ID.114-=~,116.A 1 09 Bro~le,~ay i 1.QI= 1 .1,1 1 11.1,1.- 11 111'l , 4 -, â€¢'1,21$'ll@,i' C &42 V. . 4%77 . Ck. 1619 . - 34.7 -- ---994 48Â· . Â«'Planned Obsâ€¢*htory Location . 310 ir. t VI'lie Wil 0 a / . 17 1% : ... 9 * + 4 r L % 1 ,; i '1:,1 1 V L, +AA., ./ 54ii//",3... ' â‚¬1- 5/r' Im..BA|.r 4~. 1.- ad R High School IF )' Â·ru- Page #4 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 1 , III. REVIEW CRITERIA Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.13.C. 1 Public Schools describes the review procedure for public school development. It states, 1. "Prior to acquiring land or contracting for the purchase of land for a school site, the board of education shall consult with and advise the Estes Valley Planning Commission, in writing. 2. Prior to construction of any structure or building, the board of education shall submit a development plan for review and comment to the EVPC. 3. The EVPC may request a public hearing before the board of education on the proposed site location or development plan. If the EVPC requests a hearing, the board of education shall promptly schedule the hearing, publish at least one (1) notice in advance of the hearing, and provide written notice of the hearing to the EVPC. 4. The EVPC shall consider all information presented at the public hearing. If no hearing is requested, the EVPC shall consider all information provided by the board of education, and shall convey its findings and recommendations to the board of education. 5. Failure of the EVPC to act within thirty (30) days after the date of official submission of the proposal or development plan shall be deemed an approval, unless a longer period for review is granted by the board of education. 6. The authority to make final determinations as to the location of public schools and the authority to erect buildings and structures shall remain with the board of education." The above section of the EVDC implements Colorado Revised Statute Title 22 Education, Article 32 School District Boards - Powers and Duties Section 124 Building Codes - Zoning - Planning - Definitions. EVDC Section 3.13.D Standards For Review states, "The EVPC and Boards shall review the extent and location of the proposed public use for its consistency with the goals, policies and objectives stated in the Comprehensive Plan and for its compliance with this Code." IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Page #5 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 , Estes Park Public Works Engineering See Greg Sievers' email to Alison Chilcott dated April 9,2007. Estes Park Light and Power Department See Mike Mangelsen' s memo to Bob Goehring dated March 30,2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letter to Alison Chilcott dated April 3,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District See Reed Smedley's letter to Alison Chilcott dated April 6,2007. V. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Proiect Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. ReviewinE Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 3. Adiacent Propertv Owners No comments were received from adjacent property owners. 4. Use and Densitv and Dimensional Standards Staff finds that the school observatory use is a permitted use in the "CO" Outtying Commercial zoning district. The proposed building meets the minimum required setbacks, maximum allowable height, floor area, and impervious coverage limits established in the Estes Valley Development Code. 5. Utilities Utility connections to the proposed building will need to be reviewed and approved by the utility providers. Some information is provided about proposed water, sewer, and electric service connections. However, utility providers have requested additional information in order to complete their review. The site plan should be revised to provide the information requested by utility providers and copies should be submitted to the Planning Department for rerouting to utility providers. Upper Thompson Sanitation District has also requested that detailed plans be submitted directly to their office with a statement of intent. Page #6 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 The applicant intends to have high-speed internet service in the observatory to connect to observatories around the world. The Town assists with internet service connections and recommends that the applicant work with the Park School District and Town during the site planning process plan to finalize the design. The Town has found that if this planning does not occur early on in the planning process, that developers often incur additional expenses and delays. 6. Fire Protection The applicant has not submitted ISO calculations to evaluate whether existing hydrants provide sufficient fire protection for the observatory. Fire protection is an extremely important safety consideration. The applicant should work with the Park School District and the Fire Department to ensure that adequate fire protection is provided. ISO calculations should be submitted to the Planning Department for routing to the Fire Department and the site plan should be revised to show any required fire hydrants. 7. Site Disturbance Standards/Tree and Vegetation Protection Staff finds that the proposed building location is on a relatively flat site with a slope of approximately four percent. Construction will involve minimal grading and no tree or rock outcropping removal. Staff recommends fencing nearby trees with construction barrier fencing to project them during construction. 8. Landscaping No landscaping is proposed. Staff recommends that a landscaping plan be prepared in conjunction with the school redevelopment and that this plan comply with the standards in the Estes Valley Development Code. At a minimum, staff recommends that revegetation with native grasses occur as soon as possible after construction so weeds do not invade the property. Native grasses often require watering to become established. 9. Exterior Lighting The Estes Valley has adopted lighting regulations to protect the night sky and minimize impacts to neighbors. Page #7 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 Staff recommends that shielded, downcast lighting is installed. Examples of this type of lighting are shown below. No les Unshielded li#t sources Shielded to cut offli#tat 90 creates glare and diffllsion to degees or less adjacent property. Se...: hell#-10.1,-SID,Asea,uon 10. Parking This building will be located next to a parking lot containing forty parking spaces. While the applicant has not submitted parking calculations, staff does not anticipate a significant increase in parking demand during the school day. The observatory will be open for public use after school and the adjacent parking lot should be available for use after hours. Staff recommends that the school and the Angels Above Foundation work together to anticipate and plan for periods of high parking demand to avoid parking problems such as overflow parking in Town right-of-way. Staff recommends that parking needs for the observatory be reviewed and incorporated into the master parking plan for the school redevelopment. 11. Sidewalk A short sidewalk is planned to connect the observatory to the parking lot. Sidewalk also connects the high school to this parking lot. There is no defined pedestrian path from the school campus to the observatory. Staff recommends that sidewalk construction be planned to separate pedestrians and vehicles. This would improve safety for children walking from nearby school buildings to the observatory and could be part of an overall pedestrian master plan. Page #8 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 VI. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to adopt and convey the staff findings and recommendations to the Park School District Board of Education. Page #9 - Park School District Observatory Development Plan #07-06 C. Page 1 of 1 Alison Chilcott From: Greg Sievers Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 11:11 AM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: Observatory site Regarding the astronomical observatory site at the Park R-3 School property site: The Public Works Engineering has no comments. Greg Sievers Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering P.O. Box 1200 (mail) 170 MacGregor Avenue (shipping) Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586 0 970-586-6909 f 970-227-0437 c gsievers@estes.org http:#www.estesnet.com/publicworks/Engineering/default.aspx 4/9/2007 Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 03-30-07 Re: Park School District Observatory Location and Extent Review, 1600 Manford Avenue The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Development Plan 07-06 for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) We need accurate, definitive information regarding the power needs and requirements i.e. voltage, amperage, and phase. Without that, it will be impossible to determine were the service will connect to our system. Who will be paying the monthly bill is another question that needs to be addressed. 1 C 1 f GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 .oveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 April 3,2007 ALISON CHILCO'IT, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-06 - Park School District Observatory Location & Extent Review 4 Dear Ms. Chilcott: I have no comment. I f you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. t ./ Ver~ Truly~XSurs, t 1 ,- Â£ t, Gregdry A. White GAW/ldr ; i J CC: Roy & Michelle Johnson 742 Lakewood Court Estes Park, CO 80517 Apr. 7. 2007 2:33AM C No, 0032 P, Upper Thompson Sanitation District PO Box 568 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 April 6,2007 Post4It' Fax Note 7671 Dale ,. 1 - A #01 ~ W 7. G Â·-O / pageG f Alison Chilcott To Al.46-n From (je<\ 00Â¥Â» A.10 A 1 Planner Co./Dept. -UNon Co. U--60 Town ofEstes Park Phone# Phone # , 649 P,O, Box 1200 Fax # Sy6-6*9 5/6 - 04-8. Fax # Estes Patk, CO 80517 - Ref: Park School District Observatoty Location & Extent Review Metes & Bounds 1600 Manford Avenue Dear Alison, The District has feviewed yout development plans through the planning commission; however, Upper Thompson Sanitation District being a separate entity from the town will require specific sewer plans and a letter of intent. The Disttict will require a set of plans that displays the proposed plumbing fof the 8ttUCtUre, A six inch service line will be required. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, AA 1.. Reed W. SmÂ¢dley Lines Superintendent Upper Thompson Sanitation District CC: Roy & Michelle Johnson 742 Lakewood Coutt Este8 Park, CO 80517 (970) 227-7603 r, ESTES VALLEY â€ž--- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION; A,1 # Iii MAR - 2 2007 Submittal Date: 0 Ul &41 1 Tvoe of Application 4 Development Plan r Boundary Line Adjustment Conrilnminiâ€žm M.p Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition P Street Name Change 1- Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension E Supplemental Map Final Subdivision Plat 1- Other: Please specify Minor Subdivision Plat 1-rc 414 or--7 + Ext *7+ 12â‚¬9;e vo . A - C- F- Amended Plat Getieral Information Project Name Fierab .90232- r'nemonqo Obsen)ajoe Y Project Description NO 60;W an ohsaocdory An +he Gchon/ j rn-1 n râ‚¬ Project Address Aste-b A,LIC 11jQP Shon / Legal Description @k.&12 School aistrict Parcel ID # -2-S-2,93 -00- 9 zi Section 1. 9 Township 5 Range Z Site Information Total Development Area (acres) Existing Land Use Sch:.0/ Â¥ac'â€¢Ul-,r 5 ~ Proposed Land Use Sched -A- t.; 114-1 e, -Includ',Cb ci n Obser,cd-orÂ·~ Existing Water Service rv~own r Well r Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service 11>Town F Well F Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service r EPSD [C/UTSD r Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD IP--UTSD f- Septic Is a sewer lift station required? F Yes rv-No Existing Gas Service PO<cel P Other f- None Existing Zoning '1-Ot' Proposed Zoning Sanie AL. Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the *1*? F Yes M-No Has site staking been colÂ®letld? F Yes 9110 Primary Contact Information -. Name of Primary Contact Person fn i r h Al E Skh naoA Mailing Address 74 2 k-1%-41130<ir} 00(jet r. 0 en (*)5/ 7 Attachments r Application fee r Statement of intent r 3 copies (foIded) of plat or plan r 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan r Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include 1*) calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park + P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev 1 1 111 03/22/2007 15:33 FAX 0001 ( C P I 4 J ~ - Primary Contact Person is r Owner rt/Applicant E Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(s) *,A..i.k &<ch,on 1 0 Â£ sk ica Ma\Ung Address /463 groOLLL /4,Mt Phone 5rl.,1 u / Cell Phone F. 61:6 -/lot - Email , Apputant A<46-6 Ohouâ‚¬ Foi )0/1 Ai-,0( Mailing Address /. 90 ,8 4-Â¥' R. 6 4/ // } L , Phone 970 -.â‚¬C- 3, FLK Cell Phone 9 70 r 23 S -34 3-5 Fax 910 - 577 - 96,33' Email I ,+ B. a nods a.loduf..6 i 4 . . , Consultant/Engineer t:Ft Â¥6**c-A *50- 8,& 6, .ujit-Grld)4 Mailing Address 29% Â£09- 2>rock hr, 08 phone.89/-)219 40+60 Ar-k. G 236 1-2 +04*.4 Cell phone 4>04 - 75(55 44-tz, . K949 Fax 4 '-2 -#. W Ema\\(0 ki)Oben â‚¬5*Quent<,-1.*n~panD @,a-QpuÂ·* APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both Inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.corn/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivlsion Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owner8 where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT Li Ajâ€¢- 2.h,feÂ»An u.-1/\ A .0 1 Appicart PLEASE Plit#:f / /CA-Â¢ /4 JI Anfo o Signatures: 407 ff Record Owner V , -f- af|711~ 2- _ Date *(5â‚¬01 Applica . . 1/ - 1- - Date 3- 93 4 7 / ' I -1 03/22:2007 15:33 FAX [21002 f-' APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. â€¢ In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public heating requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVOC}. â€¢ 1 acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had me opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) * I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for lillng and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC â€¢ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the infonnation provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged If my application is Incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. * I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property dunng the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PANTÂ· Linj* Cho-pma.n Appkant PLEASE PRINTh'lidld.u 31>knjo n Signatures: Record Owner lt/k 1-/FA, - Date N 20â‚¬ Â°7 A*&29 y(U-NulÂ« se. a - 32 -09 Revised 10/13/00 ' . 0 91% hhAN h SARANNAWAN W NANAN /6 Â©ANANANA 10 LO tO 10 *1 tO ~ LO X ID tO 10 E & 10 ID 9- 1.0 tO 10 10 U) tO 00 10 10 10 10 10 ID tO 0000 00 00 00 0021 2@; Mya@2224:22-222222@NOOOOOOO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Â©oooOO&*02 0000000000,oO000000<000000060 80Â°000003@0*99.09.0000:00&10000099&00000004Â·08 No*oligigogfwziqgglidliJJigifff=likiggitig O-Ir M Or m ) wm o (* * X M B M E) - 1 Or -.19 m DILIM M M -~ Mtr tr CM B Irm W M 2< Z<<<<O-Z<1 01-<<<<I<<OCZ<<<<<<E<<<<<<<MLLI< 150-0-0-0.0 -a_LJOL~u-a-a-a-a-<a-0-Dza.a.~a-a-a-/0-0-0-a-a-a-a- -aza- 33-1 CD CO cO c/) 0%;u)*0*coacou)cocozinco 1.- LLI co u) co m cocozcocom cocococoseco LU UJ U.1 LU 111 - -b LU W ..r Z LU ~ Ul Ul LU Ul J Ul LLI < 1- W LU LU Ul LU Ul U.| LU UJ LU Ul Ul LU LU Â£ CE LLI > ~ 1- 1- 1- 37 3: H. 6 !:!:! < H- 0 ~_ ,_ 0- ~_ U M- H- O Z 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- ,- 1.1.1 H H. ,. ~_ ~_ ~_ ~_ = LU 1- O U) CO U) w 82 waor LA0 Lr co u) 0 0 Â« U) CO LU U.1 cO 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <>CO 0 0 _1 LU LLI UJ LU _ O LU LLI LU LL LU 00 U.1 LU LU LLI J U.1 LU OOLULLILLIUJUJU.1 CO LLI ILI 111 LU LLI ILI LU U) LU LU g I 1- D R RIg 0 g: >t~ g Ng LUU X >7 rrmn > J % 1- 00 % E O 5 g366~53 85 03 orzorzo m z O 3>0 -LUm , r- U) Prnm=~** 9- w~~I-=22=~ 0 Z =k=ZO=~ 1- O =994 m 10 < LLI Z &12 2 * I O e cy W LLI < O I N g 04 i -JB ul H 0 01->ECO~$0-<H-N E OLUIUM>< Z 30%22@8&*di coos= 52 coRIOZ<<00005(\IOOCOLU<<602 co 501<MULU U) < p- 00 10 00 0 00 0 0 â€ž 0 0 00 cga- cv 00 co co w co 00 DO co o I -1- DO CV LUO O U) 0 0- @OEN~20292;9WgSgi;30003~WOON#'2&190gO;22~09%%*~gRI A O- 00 - - O- r - - - 00 - - h â€¢- O- O- O- - N O- O- N 00 N CO - O- - O- N h CD O- - h 00 - 10 - h LU d z 82 - O 2 LU > M 0 W O < Cr 6 m 0 Z< ZI 3 Om E # 0 9 U) 4 &O 18 0 LL Z> < 1.1-1 1-u < N co 0 0 0 -1 Z IL 06 -0 Ul *E TE < 1 > -1 0- < E 0 I L.LI LU CE CO O 0 CD LU co OI'0000 0 m -1 d u.1 -1 -1 % 6 =W Z 2 Z - 28 CO co ig â‚¬ 00 0 UJ O-1 Z â‚¬ E _1 0 E H O 3 U.1 (5 m I cr Mg Sor &~EM a m253t OX m < JO2zEW Z-<O WE:(51-~- UJ 1- W <Ui I f5~~~4~Mia-~ E~~W~# EZEWISLU##f5~ Â·zO<< IISU.1~Rm &29#10<0026515 *o>CO>:,--Sio 3&9*05.0 25 1 ~ Ir < ~28 ~~. 45 ~SE ~ * 9* 92~ gssimm E Le El ## 8 me . ba ~ 3E w -5=gu u 23~EW -1 012&2 ~fjiSca dEE~SE Lr -jo -a~& 5546 ~-u-~ ~d E~ uj ui W Z LU LLIZ Z 49 E LL' U) *C < tti LLI ?3 >~Cor Cr W< orz Qo<>: M~% 5 3 8 *3 8Â¤ 488 15@ * 88 Q i = & 5 % 8888 z m ._1-U)>LUCE_<OCOaZ-- na==aw=< < >oZ=!<00 O<-1-1-1-,an_QCOOU)O<-,Or6sOOmacrOImmLI-mU.laUJUJU-LLILOIDIELLIO~5 LEEN BAUMAN COUNTY 80452 ESTES PA 80517 FUNERAL SERVICE, INC 80631 OCABLE TRUST HE~IR 0538 ZL908 -1 VNNOG 9 HlnOS A. BANEY WAPITI CIR UNIT 42 ld)GIS 33 BARNTHOUSE EMILY KAY PLUMMER 4041 Nl >I33EIO bl3A Owner 11 Address 9**E X08 Nl 31 Â¥3 r' 90-ZO da 10!49!0 I0040S MJed SPENCER ASTRID LAMPEY SANDRA E. CARL NVOO 3113INVa 1Snk=Il 9NIAI1 EVELOPMENT, INC OCABLE TRUST LLE S331Snl=Il NEI:1 . BOUZIDEN ONI '1-NBINd013A30 3 80 HS . r C Ah h hh hhAN h h EN hhAN al hh EEGE EgE 0Â§** SO~~E~ ~Â§~~ woooa 000 0,086 ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ EHOOE=Â§0200 @000020209 2*Q-orn-00000 ooRE a<O u)UO U LL' 00 WOO N M O U O O 20 0 0 Â¥ -U<.a_<000004-00-h ALLIg~Â£-12'n>ir}M-zh,-b,-RlbÂ£-12122~0~2 -~000%~22000-2.h,-1212'jtdh,-12-S 5 ~EN! %%@ gg-* 9.cror h> cror Irrn 0% ~ % 99% f~'* 000 --In (/DILATI=cron - 85~%%&(22,0-922Â¤5-0-0-0-0-ciaGlus<m<co-&3-2*fi22*Jifgg~ < <C < < 09 K Mitil 2% Amm #96 mfimm #em *moQG*m edg EEmmf w z Lu ui (rx < Z 0 < U) CD _1 -1 0 U) U) U) 1-1-1 0 (r ~ O -1 U) U) U) U) 1.1-1 U.1 U) U) 1- < 1- -00)J<Dr M 1.- CO 1- 1- > > 1- 1- 1- 1- Z 1- U. 1- 5&3*G<W-'QI-1-1-E-ZEI-,-LUOD O J u- LU LLI CD - < LU I LU LU <O111111 LU LU O U.1 5 E < < 00 ~UJO CD O < LU LU LU W O O. LU UJ CO N CO g W 9 d 0 M > N 1 OVN ~~~J~853~~ ~~~aEE@*EssM* ~M~~~~~~0 ~~~2 5<a 31 3%%3,ZEgi *& 223 ZggE .uit 90<IZ<ICD r FZM*ZEJ LU Q 2 0*RE.LI:!a-fac/)62=895Coorg~>O9a;;LOOJ JOBLLIZjOA 52 h Â© 00 0 10 - O N ~-~ tO K 00 0 - 91Â· 1.0 0 1 W O 00 O CO O 1.0 00 00 CD E Ba*Â§0~*~ 0~EW=@gnEGRES~MwoswE@Ag~wogr~:owÂ®z < h - 9- O- N 00 h pl 00 h â€¢- 09 (\1 1- CD CD - m CD (\1 h pl 00 0- <D - r- 9- 10 1- <D 9- O. 9- CD (\1 - O. T- 10 9- Z LU 0 Z Z Z O ZW Q J U - CD a losfor Z --1 Ew 22 gg e 5 m 0 -5 0 Z 8 02 2 JO a. $ = a 0- CO CE Itt a. 1- 1- 0 Lu O D -1 6 m z w @,8 1- MA LU M H-O 0- oz-%1-2 CE 0 LL O 3 < *66!/coy JOoraj ~;EoOO W Z DC I 0 D. 0- (50-310 %Â¢00-00 &10rwE 2%2J (DeDZ-M 6 ZLLISCO-5= Ir ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 W d m o > * od o E & Â§ @5~~ ~ UJ ZD 08 2 M = 52001-JO CL 1 ~tifz w~H-52 .8~5 Ii] O Â·06=<JOJEuia@CZECOLE:QI.Li ~Ci 3%%<E@~%0Jl~%26&=6=% > ~ aa Z E = 48 3 08 ~ 30 S W Z : * 9 m * I M O - LU, LUO W QEP za z 29 *Z Z LU : <5 < < EZ ~ inn<<>BEEzB=ILT# OZZ-mzB>wir><<Â¤g~~5>emizZJ 03@loW~33%*m@8% =229 i&~ Â§03% 25Rd EE LE = or= 5%123@2W % SUSAN M. HOYT 80526 KARI ANN JOHNSON TS, MN 55076-5 6 1609 OO ' 290009 966*â‚¬ 1 -1-~ EIVd ~] ASSB hip '10.1(~~H~d 80 *3 11 A>1 3 0 OYD 1~. &~G A. HORST 1 COUNT NAININO: NOSIEI r' 9010 da 10!49!0 10040S Wed NELDA JEAN JAMIESON PAMELA C. KEARNEY . KOZLOWSKI RTMENTS NERSHIP MM. CHAN IS-BN,ALONG 9139NVIN OBVHOIW Owner 11 LE LIVING TRUST 3. IGNATZ JONES ... r-N h <D h h 5&188 ONAANAN A CO~ ~@ I~@~~@#~~ 2@ 9Â§*@**@EGEEGE - mOOOOOO 0 22503 22050Â°Â°-' 00 00*0* 0-Or-WeD 0000 0 0 00 -00 cv 003< OP<9626 - 00 00 00 00 00 00. 00 5, O 4 09&12 ER>08 f80 0-0 g.:420 . 99-0 00 0 0 0230 0 if < < M v- <- < 0<zz<00 !-4 < W. m _1 H Z O O-<Â«<<<<~z<<<O inviwoumwaz.2=21&*Â°Mo_ortia:*tal.w< 0-0-7-Drzo-cro-Qfo- 1-- 0-0-0- co U) O 1-6 Ul m 2 O UJ > 111 B m W U.1 [~ S U,1 M U 1- 1-1. 0 LL R w LU LLI UJ UJ UI LLI N UI LLI UI CD 0 =LUO= <1-1-=z--1-<1-Z â€¢â€¢'1-MO<1.-OCZDIOZR<01-1-1-1-1-1-ZI-1-1-Z Â£/ON U) co =b U.1 -COLLI 0 0*U) TIC/)<<OU.1 LU IC U) U) U) U) CO U) O CO U) U) < O J -1 O LLI U.1 M OBLUDOWJ I- LU 51- CO LLI O- O LL 0 95 _-1 00 UJ Ill 111 LU LU 111 -1 LIJ LU U.1 y LU m ti Ala 8 Lr -O IJZXLLIT -itall 58 J= M - DIV -91. Irg >O Z 0- Ch J Ir rr (0 62 <3200-Jo 5*6 8% ~b 0 06 Ziwoo ME! >q w= rn=*= OOKomeÂ©0~AM-UJ~N E@zme<mb QD g %Â£ 2% 3%2*_ 53*2*EÂ®*Eg=*m~gEe*WEEETÂ¢* TZ Zgm*goos ..COOI~'0020*<50<$111<~R 6> N > Â·MgE 0028:882RgaooBER!021209&2829091%921052:81:Z 4 N - 50 ---00--Z,-000. O-C)-91-0-1.0-0- - â„¢ W N C) 9Â·-O- A-CU 16 ----h Q m 6 4 LU D 1- . Zor M fl- 0 -5 90 dg 9 I Cril <Z 2 Wd LL D ZE co JJ R -1 ul LL Z crj!+I 2 Gl - 023<Vi FE: -J M z Z - co @W 2 0 <m 0 0 00 0 5 , 00 LU I LU -1 D 0 - m Of 1- 0 g - =0 1- 9 0 -O LL-10 030_LU ,- 25 0 E ~@~fÂ«~ 3 01 CO - S::66< 6 5< 42 2 QEZE Ovew mooÂ£~I Bz H @mas= 2< Rz 5%%@*iMÂ¥00933:3%%:95'*gw:go<-1 BmBLLIC ;2~ - BiM ELL: &01 d o-5 rz fLLI -is KI-2 9<0 *< *d%3 ZU) U.1 0 9 2<,_LULL Â·O-1 U C[ I Ll,1 > W b [Â£ I u.,% LUZ 5 E~< Lu ~~~ ~ ~ ~1> in 000* <cotzkjW Oz criu 200<Ocrwccir<0<En.<0<001- O i@5*5@*Rworzo8*~Efi OOLLI ~ -10-MU-M (50(/) cri/) NU-1 $k-k-U)=DJO= co ==* &12 3 DIOEMOo R. & SUE A. SPEARING CA 92277 LINDA JELINEK 0233 t'0908 NVIN11OM M 3NllSIEIHO ZL909 aNIM L 'Elf' '1HDIEIM S31EIVHO 1SAbll U39NAOA HlIVIN . PFOHL NETREE L. PETERSON IAN KAY PETERSON HERITAGE PINES CT 01 SKETCHBO LN UNIT 6 NSCOE VIRGINIA SWINSCOE, REVOC LIVING - AVE LEY EXT NTONIA M. REICHARDT PATRICIA A. REICHARDT TRUST S HARRI 813 N IARWOOD r'90-ZO da ;0!49!0 100409 ged 13SSÂ¥1 NVA 11830 URCH OF ESTES PARK STER BRENDA JOAN R 1=13883M VEIVEIEIVEI DIWDIHM 43 01Â¥NOG 9 1IH 8 VSSI1Â¥ F AMERICA DEPT REVOCABLE TRUST M. TUCKER 1Snl=Il 318VOOA3hl 1~SNE] NHDAVA 31 W3>f-IVM .'Al ablÂ¥0OOM APR-12-2007 14:10 US BUREAU OF REC. 9706633212 P.02/02 United States Department of the Interior 9.6OOAAi~'~d~'~lk/*-~ BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 4*M=40-1 Eastern Colorado Area Office \4%11#80 11056 West County RD 18Â£ IN REPLY Loveland, Colorado 80537-9711 REFER TO: EC-1340 IND-6.00 APR 1 2 2007 Alison Chilcott, Planner II Town of Estes Park Community Development Department PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Subject: Comments regarding the Estes Valley Planning Commission's Consideration of the Park School District Campus Project - Colorado Big Thompson Project Dear Ms. Chilcott: We have received the information you sent requesting comments regarding the Estes Valley Planning Commission's consideration of the Park School District Campus Project. This letter outlines our comments for your consideration. Although the runoff coetticient may only increase from 46 percent to 47 percent, the 40,000 feet of new construction and 15,000 fectofnew pavement will nevertheless still produce a substantial increase in the impervious area. The application for the proposed project causes us concern because it does not contain a long-term drainage plan to address how water quality protection will be ensured. It is unclear to us what, if any, consideration has been given to impacts off-site from the increase in the impervious area, and the need for increased retention and filtration of storm water. It is our hope that you would ensure such a plan would be submitted and contain measures to prevent increased runoff and erosion that could affect Bureau ofRectamation lands and the water quality ofLake Estes. Furthermore, it is unclear from the application whether the proposed project includes any storm drains or other passages onto Reclamation property. If it is determined there are storm drains or other passages onto Reclamation property, a land use authorization would need to be issued by our office. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We look forward to hearing from your office with any clarifications and assurances you can provide. Please direct any questions related to this matter to Carlie Ronca, Natural Resource Specialist, at 970-962-4350. Silpcerely, 4 T- 'RG.,6- JUX"v i )act Gould Manager, Resources Division cc: Stan Gengler Estes Valley Recreation and Park District PO Box 1379 Estes Park, CO 80517 TOTAL P.02 991"045/92//I/322 SITE PLAN FOR ESTES PARK MEMORIAL OBSERVATORY LEGEND 65 C.Cb POWER POLE ~Â»Â«LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T5N, R72W OF THE 6TH P.M 3% LIGHT POLE ~ 0-0~0744' - ~ ELECTRIC PEDESTAL COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO zix ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ~ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL A WATER VALVE * FIRE HYDRANT Â® MANHOLE Â® WATER WELL EXISTING TREES OWNER: * SHRUBS LARIMER CO PARKSCHOOL 1601 BRODIE AVE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 STAKE 00.00 MEASURED OR CALCULATED DIMENSIONS (00.00) PLATrED OR DEEDED DIMENSIONS SOG SLAB ON GRADE T.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION E.V. FINISH FLOOR 0 Z E in Lu E Z O 8 2-0 U.1* O N 6 - 4 JO OC 0 30 60 90 SCALE: 1"= 30' WE >0 < 00 LU O 6 0 CE U- 7 5 5...7 -n D ~4111.i:-Â© - BUILDER: MOUNTAIN VIEW VACATION ril i MAR 2 1 2007 E DRAWN BY: PJB 742 LAKEWOOD CT. ESTES PARK, CO 80517 SCALE: ASSHOWN JOB: 2007-106 NOTES: DATE: 3-15-07 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS A LAND SURVEY PLAT NOR AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY. SHEET 2. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE RELATIVE TO THE ASSUMPTION THAT CONTROL POINT #50 (#5 REBAR) HAS AN ELEVATION OF 7506.35 3. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE IN ALL AREAS. A PROPER UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG ALL FOOTERS. 4. FOUNDATION IS TO BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. 5. ALL CUT/FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE RESEEDED/STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE SEED MIXTURE. 6. SURVEYING WAS PERFORMED BY OTHERS: ALPINE ENGINEERING, LLC SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY SURVEY ERRORS OR ~ ~ ISSUES. OF Lt'j;t'MWN"31*taUWSNE*Â§,SUWad*hagmall NOISIA3kl 31Â¥0 Oh18 L091, luoyolisieplinqeuidie@ined NV-Id 31IS 'Mied sels3 1 0 9 4%4*2 --- - - 444*. Â»3\ 14 r ., 0. . 0 2. 0, A -4 0 : I 7 4 4.4,7 7- 6't -12. . I " , 2- 0 1 2 ' . 2. I .A./ 1 4. ,6 . ... -#m..b. 6 6 606 - f 47Â¢.4.3~(9 '. AchÂ¥ 104'f ,~ ' *4 1 -0..1 1/k . 1#/ c 12/1 . i X.11~~-I/Â£.5~.., . .- - ISt:*D Â·?92 c.Â·'1217-~ $7'4: rot- '; Â·11 ,- :1 4. li * 4.41' 1. ..ha *e 7-j V -74 01Â¢,4 h T p-~ Park School District Redevelopment ~ Development Plan #07-05 Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~ PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION 1MEETING DATE: April 17, 2007 LOCATION: The Park School District campus is bounded by Brodie Avenue, Fish Creek Road (CR 63), Manford Avenue, and Community Drive and is within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Park School DistricUSame CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Neenan Archistruction STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a location and extent review of Park School District redevelopment. The Park School District has developed a six-phase plan for campus redevelopment with the last phase projected to be completed in August of 2008. A major component of the redevelopment is the closing of the existing elementary school, which serves kindergarten through second grade and includes day care and pre-school programs. The intermediate school (new elementary school), which currently serves third through fifth grade, will be expanded to include grades kindergarten through fifth grade. Staff is unaware of the plans for the day care and pre-school programs. The school board is considering options for the future use of the elementary school. 4 Below is a staff's best understanding of the redevelopment. This summary does not include all details of the proposed expansion and remodel. Phase Location New Construction Remodel (Approximate Square (Approximate Footages) Square Footages) 1 New Elementary School 26,420 sq. ft. 5,880 sq. ft. 2 New Elementary School Site Improvements, Including a New Driveway 3 Bus Loop/Parking Lot & 39-space parking lot Addition to New Elementary with exterior bus loop. School Square footage for elementary school addition included in Phase I above 4 High School 12,050 sq. ft. 24,430 sq. ft. major remodel 5 Stadium and Parking Space 600 sq. ft. Renovate Construction in Manford stadium restrooms Avenue Right-of-Way 6 Former Elementary School/ 850 sq. ft. 2,800 sq. ft. Pool Building major remodel TOTAL 39,920 sq. ft. 27,230 sq. ft. Note: Construction square footage was taken from the Cost Summary in Section 7 of the Proposed Facility Improvements and Capital Construction Projects report prepared by Neenan Archistruction on July 19, 2006. These numbers may have been revised since 2006. Phases were summarized from the Phasing Plan dated March 15,2007. The Proposed Facility Improvements and Capital Construction Projects report also proposed middle school improvements, including 12,050 square feet of new construction at the middle school and 24,430 square feet of major renovations. Staff's understanding is that additions are no longer planned to the middle school; however, renovations and site improvements will occur. Page #2 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 . I II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels One Parcel Number(s) 25293-00-921 and 25304-00-909 Gross Land Area Approximately 44 acres Net Land Area Not provided Zoning "CO" Outlying Commercial Existing Land Use Public School Proposed Land Use Public School and Observatory SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands Yes - Not Near Proposed Construction Streams/Rivers Yes - Fish Creek 100-Year Flood Plain - Not Near Proposed Construction Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Elk Page #3 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 7 4 LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING . .Â¥"nu'l UTTLE PROSPECF MOUNTAIN -Imer-L â€¢ Ir To- of Egles Park . LaKe Esles P# F j / \\ 0 , X 1 W 41Â£2 1 7946 01 11 *-4, <4-,# 39 --- I -Wip- -* ' Park School lone Tree vg Ao E-,t es Pat, -ill'W District Campus AIL 39*lill' AVE~y~- 1 ~ E:le, Palk M<xse'K-5 ~6 /1 Fo=HZ#12] ,/A f<*1,1<*p < i.*9-j' All ~/~-3~i-- 5 )7J Qqb fiÂ« Neo 1 -- i 1: 17*,9 .0 91.-t- 1 - IrrED (In 9-4.*Bm - - g )0, 0-'bid *51 rmin[[1 0 V;*PffgaR . 4 111 m[IO II][I:]C]CI]o me , Fairgrounds 1 --I 1 Estes Valley 1 Recreation 1 and Park ~ District 94.P JI,>S442 ~ Facilities -1 . 1/ 1 1 -1-1 -illulti- ingle- f ramily Park School y Family Zoning: RE District L_] co",me&,al ccommo tions 441- Campus oning: - - Zoning: CO 1 73*522!DULE__,1 ~~~~~r u'ji-Fai~y Church ~ ~- jkoning: Rk L IL 1 TE- A Page #4 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 . AERIAL PHOTOS 44â€¢ ~ Â¥*m il - #al - - i. ..i~.,1----' ~r - .1. t - - I . . 9- 27% %'b>1( , -g r- r -I %1 i r--- ' . .. t-- - . .. i . 4 - ..1 1. 7 Man 4,â€¢i.Â· 4,.4 e - iM'* 1 r /~Â·24, 4 1 -* :A P.F 74. 4 R t .t k 7 - 'i -k . ~ High / -. - ./. .r t.*= 9~ * School Ilh*pl- -M . 44,1, 01 Â¥ "-'*'=':7* MAL Old 90~1 .Ill.:-pa~t.* 79#* ... - ...i./.* .All--.I C Â¥f Elementary Middle a --; School & h - 1 212Â£99*' School 4~ g i ] 'ging~ Pool :...3 New fti~, :......25~ ~1. ...1 Elementary ~il', 4 f~ I" . 49 . 49Â¥ School 6* C " N 9 L Hk 1 "1-/O I ~1---RW-,-/ . .... 1. . m 1, A . 3'.101.0 :*I-.'ll"*"p - . A I #114->r, I f--1 i Brodi,Aw* - ' 1 4,302,1 j = . '.'I ... 4 1-': 34% ~ - - Â· Â· -r-- - -*P .- , 9 ... -- r. -r ...21 - I p.17 ~ .. <4 Ne--11 ; . 4 4 ' r-- -J 1 3- I Â¢ ifs: 4 * i r r Â·Â·iiI â€¢ . _ ' 1 'Flj ' 9,--3 :-4 f 1 'J".,.4.~ ..010.0,r&,f:: 1..<1, I. 2 - 4. .11 1 r-- . ..$ t. t.4 '- li-2 h 1 9.9,/f//b '4 4 I I 1 04$ 7~~ 1. r. .L in..., = 'fig-*/ , 1 7 - f . 1-pi~, Pr..1. ~*1 2-f AL "46744*, r .. al-j â€¢f 41 -1-- ...ir...f. &24 2 , 9 1 1 , , ..Ip ' . 6 .2 - @.Af Â¢ fi *0 01 4 - 4. ' -i... 11 4214} 11% 414=.3 0 0 19, 4 i.Fill... 1 6 , airiÂ¥ Â· 4... 7 1 I , 7'K.. liLef74 9. *Â» r. 1., r /â‚¬ - I lf.+9,Â¢71 frll E--1 Brodle /-9.4 L I. Page #5 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 4 ' ' ......4 T '11*& 4. K III. REVIEW CRITERIA Estes Valley Development Code Section 3.13.C.1 Public Schools describes the review procedure for public school development. It states, 1. "Prior to acquiring land or contracting for the purchase of land for a school site, the board of education shall consult with and advise the Estes Valley Planning Commission, in writing. 2. Prior to construction of any structure or building, the board of education shall submit a development plan for review and comment to the EVPC. 3. The EVPC may request a public hearing before the board of education on the proposed site location or development plan. If the EVPC requests a hearing, the board of education shall promptly schedule the hearing, publish at least one (1) notice in advance of the hearing, and provide written notice of the hearing to the EVPC. 4. The EVPC shall consider all information presented at the public hearing. If no hearing is requested, the EVPC shall consider all information provided by the board of education, and shall convey its findings and recommendations to the board of education. 5. Failure of the EVPC to act within thirty (30) days after the date of official submission of the proposal or development plan shall be deemed an approval, unless a longer period for review is granted by the board of education. 6. The authority to make final determinations as to the location of public schools and the authority to erect buildings and structures shall remain with the board of education." The above section of the EVDC implements Colorado Revised Statute Title 22 Education. Article 32 School District Boards - Powers and Duties Section 124 Building Codes - Zoning - Planning - Definitions. EVDC Section 3.13.D Standards For Review states, "The EVPC and Boards shall review the extent and location of the proposed public use for its consistency with the goals, policies and objectives stated in the Comprehensive Plan and for its compliance with this Code." IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Page #6 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 Estes Park Public Works Engineering See Greg Sievers' memo to Alison Chilcott dated April 9,2007. Estes Park Water Department See Jeff Boles' memo to Bob Goerhing dated April 6,2007. Estes Park Light and Power Departments See Mike Mangelsen' s memo to Bob Goehring dated March 30,2007. Town Attorney See Greg White's letter to Alison Chilcott dated April 3,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District See Reed Smedley' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated April 6,2007. V. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Proiect Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 3. Adiacent Property Owners No comments were received from adjacent property owners. 4. Site Planning Site planning is being completed by phase immediately prior to construction of each phase. This includes planning for utilities, drainage, and pedestrian and vehicular access. Submitted elementary school plans are ninety percent complete and high school plans are fifty percent complete, so staff' s findings and recommendations are based on a partial understanding of the proposed redevelopment. Thorough site planning can save time and money in the long run and is important to making informed construction decisions. The Estes Valley Development Code requires that private developers complete detailed site plans prior to construction of large projects and staff recommends that the school prepare detailed and complete site plans prior to construction. Staff also recommends that the observatory construction be incorporated into this planning process. Page #7 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 5. Site Disturbance/Drainage Staff estimates that roughly 20,000 to 40,000 square feet of impervious coverage is being added to the site with the building additions and roughly 60,000 to 70,000 square feet of paving and concrete is being added. This is a significant increase in impervious coverage and water that used to soak into the ground may run off more quickly into Lake Estes or onto adjacent property and rights-of-way. A stormwater drainage report and plan should be prepared that evaluates and mitigates the off-site impacts of the increased stormwater runoff. Potential impacts include erosion and flooding of adjacent property and rights-of-way and reductions in Lake Estes water quality. 6. Vacation of Right-of-Way There is a sixty-foot-wide stretch of Manford Avenue right-of-way (shown on Sheet 1 of 4 of the School Survey prepared by Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc.) that is not occupied and Town staff may support vacating this right-of-way. This right-of-way runs along the northwesternmost property line, to the north of the high school. A school parking lot currently encroaches into the right-of-way. If this right-of-way is vacated, the school would most likely own some or all of this property. 7. Construction in Right-of-Way During Phase V, five handicapped-accessible parking spaces are proposed to be constructed in the Manford Avenue right-of-way. This requires review and approval by the Town Public Works Committee and the Town Board. 8. Driveway Access to Town Streets A traffic impact analysis is an important planning tool to evaluate and mitigate off-site impacts of construction. A traffic impact analysis should be prepared for Town review and approval. Adding traffic to the two access points at the intersection of Manford Avenue and Community Drive is unsafe and an alternative access point for the proposed thirty-nine-space parking lot should be proposed for review and approval. One option is to take access from the old elementary school parking lot. Adding traffic to the driveway connection just south of the pool could create traffic congestion on Community Drive, depending on whether a one-way or two-way driveway is proposed. The traffic impact analysis should analyze the impact of this proposal and this impact should be reviewed by the Town. Page #8 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 . 1 With relocation of students and staff from the old to the new elementary school, there has been a significant increase in traffic turning in to the new elementary school parking lot from Brodie Avenue. The school has worked with the Town Police Department to alleviate the traffic congestion and delays caused by vehicles staking on Brodie Avenue waiting to turn into the school parking lot. Brodie Avenue should be widened and a center turn lane constructed for all points of school access. The school district should consider closing the westernmost access on Brodie Avenue. Remove Driveways @ - / Manford/Community Manford Drive - 4' 15' Intersection Illillini1111!licittilinmtimm ~pqb. , F i - 4i,1'1'1111'lli.~~~~~~~~il~11ii~~~~,~~1 l~~ 4.4.2~ f / 7-': -\\641111111111~111111111111111 4Â¥ ,~1 4 4 4 1, ..6 ->\ 111111111 *1111 1 111 l\\~..t - % / \ 4 4 'r *.*rf - Cr=. , \% f \ , .PIE 4 4/, % 4 . \ 4 4 - mus Â¥3 N- rm.- \7 \ 02....4 ... kl Asphalt 11 1 '~ Loop ~ < :F~ 4- -.. Â¢ ~ Parking /,t c 2// 1 0 / > Elementary 3Â»nuu/ School I. 7 21 --=L f Pool ~IM) 1 J 1 1 + 1:11 Â» 1 4 - 111 % d New ~~/ Spons / + 44 k "44* Field 1% Review added traffic #, liementary L ~*, rl School - 7*4- B : ./ @ this location. Is this Asphalt proposed as one-way \\' A ' I .11/ 43-\ 1 1 j . A V I . drive? *~441 ~~~ ~ Eâ€¢- . ~kfAFfid/4 Provide Left-Bound Turn Lane for , \ X CD / 4' 1 Build!991 Brodie Ave. Access Points Brodle Avenue 9. Sidewalk Both internal pedestrian connections, e.g., connections from building to building on campus, and external connections, e.g., connections from the Fish Creek Trail to the school campus, are very important. Staff recommends that site planning include planning for pedestrian connections. Staff is especially concerned about the external pedestrian connections to the school campus. As noted in Greg Sievers' memo, concrete sidewalk should be provided in the locations shown below and trail should be provided north from the high school to the Fish Creek Trail system. Page #9 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 -9 Trail North Manfirri 1-}rive From the 8'-Wide Sidewalk with Curb & Gutter from -44*j- High School Community Drive to the High School School Q. High ) to Fish Creek Trail LI . il'lili"j'j] I'll]~ 1 'f../i/.01.~P / -4 , :.*T; t/ Â£ 4 .....6 Â» 1.vÂ«# 4 Ip k/ , 4 \\J AX , --1 -443 1 O/32~ i 010 I iN School ,/ Middle j 8/ ; school , ; 1, -Â·-- , ~ ~ ~ / 1 ==-- â‚¬Il 4 -fÂ« 1 /1 11 1 2 %> %1 1 4 *IIi ,%1%6 ~~lementary SCIT /%9. 1 Mayfield 99~ A/Vic .1--,t It I Asphalt bo m 8'-Wide Sidewalk with Curb & Gutter from Community Drive to :ttnie Fish Creek Trail System Rrodie Avenue 10. Utilities - Water, Sewer, Electric The Water Department has reviewed the submitted plan and requested additional information to complete their review. The information requested in leff Boles' April 6,2007 letter to Bob Goehring should be provided to the Town. The Light and Power Department has not expressed any concerns about the proposed electric design. Light and Power has commented that a written recorded easement is required for the relocated underground three-phase primary electric line. Sewer plans and a statement of intent should be submitted directly to the Upper Thompson Sanitation District for review. Based on review of the submitted plans, UTSD, in their April 6, 2006 letter, noted required upgrades. 11. Fire Protection The applicant has submitted ISO calculations to evaluate whether existing hydrants provide sufficient fire protection. Planning staff' s understanding is that automatic sprinklers are proposed in the new elementary school and the high school, and that no additional hydrants are proposed or needed based on the submitted ISO calculations. Some hydrants will be relocated to accommodate the redevelopment. For example, hydrants located in areas proposed for building expansion will need to be relocated. Page #10 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 Wide Sidewalk with Curb & Gutter from Community Drive rodie Ave. to Manford Ave. The applicant should work with the Fire Department to ensure that adequate fire protection is provided. The Fire Department has not completed their review of the ISO calculations and water plan. Staff recommends that the Overall Water Plan be updated to reflect the proposed improvements on the site and to accurately reflect existing water improvements. For example, some parking lot, driveway, and stadium improvements are missing on the plan. 12. Use and Density and Dimensional Standards Staff finds that the proposed use is a permitted use in the "CO" Outlying Commercial zoning district. The proposed building additions meet the minimum required setbacks, with the exception that the high school addition appears to be proposed four feet from the Manford Drive property line. The school should survey the location of the property line prior to construction and ensure that high school addition does not encroach into the right-of-way. Staff does not have sufficient information to determine if the building additions comply with the maximum height limit or if proposed improvements comply with the maximum impervious coverage limit established in the Estes Valley Development Code. Staff assumes the floor area ratio is not exceeded. 13. Tree and Vegetation Protection Some trees will be removed to accommodate new construction. Staff recommends saving as many trees as possible and fencing trees adjacent to construction with construction barrier fencing to protect them during construction. 14. Landscaping No landscaping is proposed. Staff recommends that a landscaping plan be prepared in conjunction with the school redevelopment and that this plan comply with the standards in the Estes Valley Development Code. This would include providing landscaped islands for the proposed parking lot, including interior landscaped islands. At a minimum, staff recommends that revegetation with native grasses occur as soon as possible after construction so weeds do not invade the property. Native grasses often require watering to become established. 15. Exterior Lighting The Estes Valley has adopted lighting regulations to protect the night sky and minimize impacts to neighbors. Page #11 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 L Staff recommends that shielded, downcast lighting is installed. Examples of this type of lighting are shown below. 1 No Yes Untielded liÂ®t sources Shielded to cut off lit#at 90 creates glare and affllsion to degees or less. adjacent properly. 50/ne: hte=utiant"D.*-Sky A.sod,ion 16. Parking Staff does not have sufficient information to evaluate the proposed parking plan. VI. SUGGESTED MOTION I move to adopt and convey the staff findings and recommendations to the Park School District Board of Education. Page #12 - Park School District Redevelopment - Development Plan #07-05 4 0 Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Town Hall P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, gsievers @estes.org Memo TO: Alison Chilcott, Planner From: Greg Sievers Date: April 9,2007 Re: Park R3 School District site - Manford & Community After reviewing the Location & Extent Review plan the Public Works Department has the following comments: Engineering: 1. Provide Traffic Impact Analysis for surrounding public streets. 2. Widen Brodie Avenue and construct center turn lane for a113 points of school access. 3. Provide concrete curb & gutter along existing edge of asphalt at frontages of Brodie Ave, Community Drive, and Manford Avenue. 4. Replace asphalt trail along Community Drive with 8' concrete trail and extend to Manford. 5. Provide 8' concrete sidewalk along Brodie Avenue from Community to Fish Creek. 6. Provide 8' concrete sidewalk along Manford from Community to HS driveway. 7. construct pedestrian trail north from High School to Fish Creek Trail System. â€¢ Page 1 To: ' Page 1 of 2 ( Alison Chilcott From: Bob Goehring Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 7:48 AM To: Alison Chilcott Subject: Park School District Plan 07-05 Hope this helps. To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 4/06/2007 Re: Park School District Location & Extent Review Metes and Bounds Park School District campus bounded by Brodie Avenue, Fish Creek Road (Cty Rd 63), Manford Avenue & Community Drive . After review of the Development Plan 07-05 the Water Department has the following comments: 1) The attached overall water plan drawing shows a water line section that does not exist. Attached correspondence between the fire suppression company and the Fire Chief indicate a possible water main loop that has not been discussed with the Water Department. Contact the Water Department at 577-3608 to discuss and review proposed modifications for approval. 2) Applicant must schedule a Water Fixture/Dwelling Unit Count with a representative of the Water Department prior to demolition and/or construction to ensure any applicable credit toward additional water fees. Contact the department at 970-577-3622 for scheduling. Any demolition done prior to the fixture count will result in forfeiture of any applicable water tap credits. 3) If the structure is required to have a Fire Suppression System a 'Fire Sprinkler System Connection Application' must be completed and submitted to the Water Department before any connection is granted. This application must include a detailed drawing noting: â€¢ Location, sizing and type of backflow prevention device(s) â€¢ Engineered flow requirements for the fire sprinkler system â€¢ Spill control method for proper disposal of discharge from the relief valve, indicating location and sizing of drainage capable of accommodating the discharge that could occur Due to fire line size both a chlorination and pressure test will be required, conducted by a representative of the Water Department prior to acceptance. 4/12/2007 C Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 03-30-07 Re: Park School District Location and Extent Review, Metes and Bounds The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Development Plan 07-05 for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) We need a written recorded easement for the relocated under ground three phase primary electric line. 1 C C GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 April 3,2007 ALISON CHILCO'IT, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Development Plan 07-05 - Park School District Location & Extent Review Dear Ms. Chilcott: I have no comment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. jery Tn#y Yours, R Ill GAgory A. White GAW/ldr CC: Fax: 970/586-1110 . Apr.Â· 7. 2007 2:22AM C No. 0030 P. 1 C Upper Thompson Sanitation District PO Box 568 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 April 6,2007 Alison Chilcott Post-ltÂ® Fax Note 7671 Datel.1-6-09 146.,- - Plannef To A, ' - From 84 -3-ah- Town of Estes Park Â¥4\.xibli CLGe.44 P.O. Box 1200 co./Dept...~.&*.- % Q. 0 . Co. g,1 0 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone # Phone 1 - - 4-4 %-49 58 6 -0149 Fax # 4-/049 Ref: Park School Dietrict - - Metes & Bounds 1600 Manford Avenue High School, Middle School and New Elementaty School Renovation Dear Alison, , The District has reviewed your development plans thiough the planning commission; however, Upper Thompson Sanitation District being a separate entity from the town will require specific sewer plans and a letter of intent. The Disttict will requite a set of plans that displays the proposed plumbing for each Phase of the project, Additional plant investment fees ate due and payable before a building permit will be signed-off. In order to reduce confusion, the comments will irefer to a patticular building: High School 1) A gfease interceptcir will be required for the food preparation facility. The Disttict will need to be contacted regarding the sizing of the grease interceptor. 2) The District does not have an accurate of complete fecord of the existing sewer service lines and therefore cannot comment on the impact on the proposed construction. 3) The service lines should be 6 inch PVC SDR 35 or better to provide capacity for futwe use, 4) The District will need to see plans to review the ptoposed plumbing for the new addition. Middle School 1) A giease interceptor will need to be installed if none exists. The Diguict will need to be contacted regarding the sizing of the grease Apr. 7. 2007 2:23AM < i No.0030 P. 2 intetceptor, 2) The Digtricts maps indicate a private 8 inch clay collection system, The existing flat slope has and type of pipe has been a maintenance issue. The District would like to recommend that you upgrade this line. 3) The District will need to see plans to ieview the proposed plumbing for the new addition, New Elementaty School (current Intermediate School) 1) Capacity of the existing grease interceptor needs to be determined to 8ee if it compliee with current District Standards, 2) The District will need to 8ee plans to review the proposed plumbing for the new additions. 3) The Distficts maps indicate a 4 inch and a 6 inch PVC private collection system. Tile District tecommends that you upsize the 4 inch PVC to 6 inch PVC to accommodate future use. Existing Elementary School 1) Capacity of the existing gfease intetceptor needs to be determined to f 4 see if it complies with current District Standards. A grease interceptor will need to be installed if none exists. 2) The District will need to see plans to teview the proposed plumbing for the new additions. Thank you for yout time. Sincerely. 8444 Reed W. S*iey Lines Superintendent Upper Thompson Sanitation District C 0 LARIMER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT VACOUNTY Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Alison Chilcott, Town of Estes Park Planning Department FROM: Traci Downs Â·11) Development Services Engineer DATE: April 2,2007 SUBJECT: Park School District- Town of Estes Park Location and Extent Proiect Description/Background: This is a Location and Extent Review for the additions to the high school and elementary school at 1505 Brodie Avenue. The site is within the Town limits and is just south of Lake Estes. Fish Creek Road is to the east and Community Drive is to the west. Review Criteria: The intent of a Location and Extent Submittal is to obtain information for the proposal that ensures that the public use and structure will conform to the adopted master plan. We also review applications in this area per the Estes Valley Development Code, Larimer County Land Use Code where applicable, and the County Stormwater Design Standards Comments: 1. It does not appear that the proposal is adjacent to any roads that are still within County jurisdiction. However, we would recommend that a Traffic Impact Study is required to evaluate any impacts the expansion will have on the transportation facilities in the area and propose any necessary improvements to mitigate for the impacts. 2. The applicant should contact the Local Fire Authority to ensure that the building and internal street layout is adequate for their purposes. 3. A drainage report should be required and any drainage facilities that are not adequate to handle the additional development should be made adequate. A discussion should be included in the report on whether stormwater detention measures are needed on this site. Additionally, the development must release into a historic drainage path or drainage easements must be provided for the transport of the site drainage to a defined drainage path. It is recommended that the site is designed with stormwater drainage facilities adequate for the conveyance of the flows in a 2 year and 100 year rain event. 4. The applicant should consider water quality Best Management Practices (BMP's) for controlling soil erosion and sediment transport during and after construction. Definitions of acceptable erosion control plans and Best Management Practices (BMP' s) are illustrated in Volume 3 of the Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards. BMP' s for this project should include, but are not limited to, vehicle tracking devices, inlet/outlet protection and silt fence to protect public streets and adjacent facilities from sediment transport during precipitation events or snowmelt conditions. H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\Park School District L&E in Town of Estes Park.doc COMMITTEDTO-EXCELLEN C C 5. Notification and approval from the proper utility authorities is required for any utility easements that are being modified in association with the proposal. Staff Recommendation: The Larimer County Engineering Department does not have any major concerns or issues with this proposal. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5701 if you have any questions. Thank you. CC: file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\Park School District L&E in Town of Estes Park.doc ~-PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT R-3 C C t. BOARD OF EDUCATION " LINDA CHAPMAN LARRY PESSES, President 1605 BRODIE AVENUE Superintendent TODD JIRSA, Vice-President ESTES PARK, COLORADO, 80517 IEREDITH SLOAN, Secretary TELEPHONE (970) 586-2361 SHIRLEY HOLT UCHAEL MILLER, Treasurer FAX: (970) 586-1108 Director of Business Services BECKY JOHNSON, Director www.estesschools.org March 16, 2007 : } j 'E# 4..5..7-1 11 1 , 11 ' : 1 1,i 4 1 1 4 i Ms. Alison Chilcott, Planner H'I 49 t. '/ 2 Town of Estes Park 170 MacGregor Avenue t..-*.-W. . . ...... ..,- =L-J 4.. Estes Park, CO 80517 Subject: Park School District R-3 Site Plan Submittal for Town Review Dear Ms. Chilcott This letter with attachments is the site plan submittal we discussed last week. As we discussed, one copy is being submitted for your preliminary review and when you request, we will assist you with making the twelve sets needed for distribution to your planning commissioners and referral contacts. We are making this submission for all of the projects included in the District's bond program. These projects include: Additions, renovations and site improvements to the Intermediate School. Additions, renovations and site improvements to the High School. Renovations and site improvements to the Middle School. Overall site improvements to the campus. Additions and renovations to the Pool. As the improvements are completed at the Intermediate School, all elementary school students in grades P-5 will be housed at that building and it will be called the Elementary School. The current Primary School building will continue to be used during the course of the bond program work to ease impacts to all school operations on the campus, but then it will cease to be used as a school by the District. There is no work at the Primary School included in this bond program. Our sequence of design and construction on the entire program is phased, and currently the Intermediate and High School projects are active. The remaining three projects have not been started, but all projects are to be completed in the fall of 2008, although the Pool project has a contingency that may imRact timing and completion. Our submittal includes the following: Completed application (delivered separately by Tony Paglia). One set of complete site survey documents - recently updated for the bond program projects. Elementary School site plans from our construction documents. High School site plans from our construction documents. Middle School conceptual improvement plan from our pre-bond planning document. Overall site plan conceptual improvement plan from pre-bond planning document. Pool conceptual improvement plan from our pre-bond planning document. Phasing plan for the entire site showing the phasing of all projects included in the program. Stormwater Management Plan Notes from various meetings held regarding fire protection requirements on the projects. (Please note that fire sprinkler systems are included in the projects at the three school buildings.) ROBIN WEIDEMUELLER BRAD SCHULTZ KAREN GLASSMAN TONY PAGLIA RANDY HINSON Instructional Services Student Services Federal Programs Auxiliary Services Athletics/Activities I F Ms. Alison Chilcott March 16,2007 Page Two Please note the parking improvements shown within the right-of-way of Manford Drive. We have discussed this location with you and await your review as to other requirements you may have. As you complete your review, please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Richard L. Huwa Owner's Representative for Park School District R-3 970-686-5695 rhuwa@rlhengineering.com Enclosures CC: Linda Chapman Tony Paglia Heidi Shuff Kevin Dorsey Siteplansubmittal.6078 r. - C Bia jw n :9 71 3,79 52% 1 ( ESTESVALLEY ; a 1 i â€¢ 4=1 Â·Â·:.9 6,:1 'd ~C ' ' ". 1 4 + 4 t, b , DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION; 2 fil-)1 1 m 16 mal ~ jj} Mi 111 -9.14 Â¢1: 1, Submittal Date: 2 1 K Development pla~.~~~m~m~Ma~p~ Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change r Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension r Supplemental Map Final Subdivision Plat R Other: Please specify Minor Subdivision Plat Ce, /r 6-9 4 120(, 'Lail - l_o codeer,-t- Amended Plat EX-w n 1- Q.4 v,Â»0 -AÂ· CÂ· General Information Project Name Rr 9 Se Linol D r~ Project Description AA,kili'ons 4-0 W.~,3 1 52|164 01,710-Q E/_o,no,yllâ‚¬1<if grl,cal Project Address I S-057 8 rodu. Avi , 19Â»o Yho,n 8,2, 1 600 rnA,~ rer,1 Legal Description Mete, + Bo#-ds %1 Â·c- ~ Parcel ID #~5&&410-1-66 Section 29 + 30 Township sri Range * -7 Z k> M Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 9 4 0 crta. 099(.09( . Existing Land Use 3600 1 1 Proposed Land Use trkools Existing Water Service Pq-own r Well r Other (Specify) Proposed Water Service~ Â· M Town E Well r Other (Specify) Existing Sanitary Sewer Service F EPSD g UTSD r septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD E UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? r Yes W No Existing Gas Service W~ Xcel F Other F None Existing Zoning C -CD Proposed Zoning ,~.Â£xrne D. C. Site Access (if not on public street) Are there wetlands on the site? F- Yes k No Site staking must be completed at the time application is submitted. Complete? F Yes F No Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person --72/7,/ 227% A 1 A. Mailing Address / 70/ 5>-O //L,4 kitu %900.s /1,/t Attachments E Application fee r Statement of intent r 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan r 11 " X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan 1- Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage repon, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue a Estes Park, CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 + Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com/ComDev 111111 1*@EXJEcation Primary Contact Person is r Owner r Applicant E Consultant/Engineer Record Ownercs) i:Ark .eckool Dal- 2--3 Mailing Address 110 | SCOC#lt-2 AVA Phone 990 - 5-26 - 2 36/ Cell Phone vax 990 -5226 - 1/08 Email Applicant 13 rly Q j 4 21 Mailing Address 170/ 8 K oj i j *U Phone 970 - 577 7 - 01 1 1 Cell Phone 970 - 221 - /676 FaA97O -994- INC> Email *Ton~ - PQ'll,ci e PSDRS. 1<12.- Co - Us Consultant/Engineer N.a,non Mailing Address 2 060 E Pror yl,7 24Â· #26,â€¢ o~ 3 -iQ>A Cot I ~ r.ls . co- A.c. phone 970- 993 -97 97 4 Cell Phone Fax Email < APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: thvt. Ar A ord Dfs 1- 12- 5 Applicant PLEASE PRINT.Â· -73 1 j ill k 0\ Signatures: < Record Owner Date Applicant 92*gf Date 3-5-0 7 Contact Information APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). â€¢ I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) â€¢ I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. â€¢ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. I The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is , 4 determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. I I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT: 93&42 9/el- 1 Dist- 0.3 Applicant PLEASE PRINT: \Ond RIA J Signatures: Record Owner Date Applicant KA,Ge Date 2-5. 07 Revised 10/13/06 1 I CO 91- NANNO N SCERNANALOAN (UNANNAN<DANNANNA REEGE. E OOOOU 0OOOOOONOOOOOOO ot @Â§*BE88@88 -~0'OLO LOU)U)010Lotou,u,~ou, 00 CO 00 00 0 - 00 M (U W 00 00 < 00 00 S 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0000.4*09 OOOOOOOOOoidooOOoOO<.0000000150 B O Elliz 0 gÂ¥ 0 29-9 99-12=1Â£3 12 9J jigibÂ£-32 12 = 9-12 12~12-1212'12~ 0 29 0000850*00000000400&10000000&0000000208 ~cDIra-crircrorELULAO@*m@Mororm-cror-ffDrDrirDrDror-~Ircrcron(DIIIrmLLIoI <<<<<<<ELLI< m U.1 0.- O. CL a- CL co -CL 1.1- a. a- a. a. <a-O-DZa-a-a-a-a-a-/a-a-~-a-a-a-a- -aza- 05 -4 0 3 0 co co co 0 $ m Z 0 !2 0 a co co co co z co co ,- u co co co co co co z co co co co co co co < e co UJUILULUWUJU.1--SLUO -ZLUOUJUJUJU.IDUJUJ<1-UJUJUJUJUILLIUJUJUJUJUILLIUJUIZELU iMMBAG:&83*ZMi~O~A#Ke~#oz,HH~~EwK#~HHH#Jw~ 0 m 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 LU U.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 E CO U) U) U) 0 0 0 < > 0 O CD LU _I LLI LLI LU LU - O LU LLI LU LL LU 00 LU LU LU LU J LU U-1 Q O LLI LU LUWW W (5 LU LU LLI LU LU LU LLI CO UJ LU g I 1- D Ret 0 66=15 Z N g co mu) ho-> E LU 0 % 1- 00 E 08 crzmz m z >OLLI LLI~LLI 0 COOZGEO H or DIDIQ=&to 0 20- 000-1 - J <co~ mEÂ¤=**%%%2% Z~g~ ~g~~~~*g 00~~LU~**~magWE= Â¤M*Corka-jkcvi&m-Imcoo-uo< > -1 22*6*82228&%68*x=axx244 <xsx (50=xacDOLI =!~ 02 ov OOcoLLI<SJOSO cO <SOD<Dre CO < 10 CO OLD 00 910 0 WIVWU- (\10000000)0000000~R-'-ir~00000eLL|-1-00cvwoo 00(- g o 81: 2 2 0 22 g le g g 2 81 : 0 0 0 1 # 0 0 ni 1 20 &19 0 go 2 2 * 0 9 2 3Â§* ~ 1&1 NO-CO-- 7- -- -00-7-h- O- O- O- - N Q. O- (\1 00 N CD -O-1-0- N h<DO--h (9 - t.0 -h 0 0 Z D O 0 m Z 1- Z -1 LU 0 0 J O - -! CO 00 - LU Z E O 9= 650 *5~ 8% 2 = D ir < ~cr ScrLud *~E~ W 0215%,- aw w -uff~ -' 0< m 02-466!a> z.<azM WECD,â‚¬ i, w JUJI= 0-z>> fooLOILI LU' U, E-1928<<4 m E=@C M%&~9 amEW@~ 68iE@wm~=,0.00 6%03 %3.Eicotem Wa~*8> zgwdH 528#@9552 ==Ww=Drid@ Â¢=61=z~2%2=26*_=84=21 4~32AQ=--- Â· 4 DICS -1 2 OI ~o <o gll.Iâ€ž,xird O*006%@EBui Â¤IJ -1~06Ej -'-7.1 <-lou 1-048@EdiMBEW:I .0 1 1 b)0-0~<Wg,~,u*g~~@EW~~~~d 9%(r-iax-<0000 LLwBÂ°~mm EZUILLIZZIC[ U.1 0, v - I k ~t U) I m LU < 3- U.1 -KI~IZEZ 90< 2.11 t j (0 $<I Ul- 0 0 (0> ZU) m-EcO >HEOZS<OVE ShEr, <<< >DZ-< '-10,00-<OOD<ZOOM<JID<00009.DI .JXU)>LLIT-<lrOJIO.2 O<-1-3-3120-QZOOC/)0<-1(I55OO(ramaIDEIEU-mILIa UJ LUIL LL LI- amELL[056 FUNERAL SERVICE, INC 13TH ST 80631 BOX 4 K, CO 80517 CO 805 ZL908 . BANEY CIR UNIT 42 -Id 30ISN3 M3IACIVOE18 11 IMO-1103 1 1Ahl3HS HlnOS Nl 000 Nl >I WIO MBH CABLE TRUST HEW CIR NE VALL Owner 11 Address 2945 1Â¥1S3 S S331Snk:Il NI:I:I 90-48 do Alole/uesqO 10!49!a I0040S ped BARNTHOUSE EMILY KAY PLUMMER ASTRID LAMPEY SANDRA E. CARLSON HAEL & BARBARA SPENCER MIKA LYNN DENNY RT RO ELLEN LINDSAY DERN REVOCABLE TI NOSNI>1310 H138VZI13 Â¥lbl3801:I NVOD 3113INVa ONI'll 39VEIO1S 313S >IEIVd S31S3 PMENT, INC 1Sn}31 9NI DEBOR L. BOU DEN Hl'1SA 80 HS . 1 (D DIAN h hh Nhhh A g Ch Nhhh N h 1- 223_I - p.- p-â€žp 0 98(y 0-Egg@E @@E ID â€ž ID LO If) If) LO tO O NOCOO O - '7 94. E g(580 9022%9-2220 O 00 00 00 00 00 1- 10 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 A 3 89Q86100*00_80000:~0 0580%0:2812 00000 002& Ower.JUOU-004-C>00008 09Â°22=!-0,0000.<00000~00=h ILI iqu,Â£:b,hET,LozzigAdigglo Miood~3Â§12:Ouo-12-32-M-M-JU)12-M-55 to .Z -1 Ir moo<Lt -B [C NSE) CC[C H51!2 ~ Ho~ 2%OClÂ° 0-m B Cr =S=CC= . .Zooo<re>~322Â¤*2222rn~m~<<0<00.&1-Â£Â£~jfdfifjf~.iifkf~26~3 65 82(0 co ~ Irzu)Scoco -[1- CO CO 0 0 LU ObmEQm*mwdE5~ EZ ~ enw 7-U) 0-1 < ic _IQ~-1-1-1-ZMI-1-WOD 1- LU U.1 Z N LU LU LU U.1 > U.11--LU LLI CI I < Â·-EOCOWI<ZU)<00_1-10*00 1.u e LE 4 5*34&5&WO_,coco co co u.1 u.~ co 0,-<,- O -111- LU LLI CO S: < LU I LU LLI < O LU LU U.1 U.1 OUJ 31.LI <<0O~LIJOCDO<LULLIUJUJOO-LUILI CO N U) ILI 9 1 < w 21 > li O Siorcrorzcr Me -1 -z'- I BEZOO(JO, 2 %2% 000% eu O BJ 4- am I LLI N Og 0 1 1- OZ 0 1- 0 M 0- > &48â€ž58&89 8*lai~~~~~85*FW &#air;92%M 3miE_t#@ o= ~~~E~~EF@EE~%Â¢#i%%1*~@%%~Eg<ggEEFE%%E*%Eg WOJ<-OBO)< <8EZMZ<x <LUO-- Ir < 8 0 0 2,8 * m w a NT 1 % 85Â£2 5 8 9 9 0 8 E~ E ~ f ox * a cd w Â° Ju d o * uj Z a o A o ~ -XU) E - 5 8g .8 -M o w &5 2 g ~w# |2 g u, u, - 1.0 000.-11.0091Â·WomocoOLOO000O- *23*~AERY*Exagxguew@Â®A&*2592*EFEF2*6*32305 Z LU 0 Z 0% za Z Z - N W 5% m -1 U 1-<oc I LU 63 - f CD % 13 w 5 Â°- 0 0 CO Z 5 < J z 3 E 2 1 Z Lli CO Z < O Z m LU Sm gf 5 W *50 < % 2 8 6@E U-5 20 M X $=ad M M m Itt Z O 0 LU D-J Dre NE m D El Woly Z 1- 0 z-0-1-2 ~ U.O cocom j ~- -IRLLIB zif8 0-n<d LU ZCD O CEÂ¢01-00 MmU.1 - ~ 1- < hE M z 03.0~~~ m O L 6000 anZ %23& W,rÂ·(007, C 0- Ul k J m 32%52%%*E@2%%*3*22*32*@%*3%9 =as=WID<DJOI <-55<OQU,06-liu-IM Â·4-ded=J 9<ZZOOJEZOLL' <5~*EXW 700 O Â£ i@zizch~~M2a~a 2 '- 0 .-ZZJUJ< *222[c*Z>t-rzdggr J/0 luzwoe.gEQZQW~Co<ZZLULOCD<<<Zn 12m=gme*9g*m*m%*m*m*M*Z*****m*iM*a*4=mm*Â®* KAR A N JO NSON TS, MN 55076-5 6 L608 OO ' O93vy -vy ISTINA LONG K, 80517 L G ORD 80026 1908 966*81 %0 blvd CI A:93 hiP '1.LOWEIVd '9 Ela *3 90-0 da AloleA.lesqO 10!Jls!0 IOO40S >ped NELDA JEAN JAMIESON SUSAN M. HOYT S139NVW aEIVHOIH 1 Owner 11 LIVING TRUST C. IGNATZ R. KLAPPER HORST ARTMENTS 31EI3HM3IN HEIVyl3H C 4 h CON N b al CO e:8:8-K Nt:hANT-h DDOF & e h @LOOCOEÂ®COCO~ WOOho.<000 0 - - woo MEE~g~g~00*dOXEgÂ©0000 MimÂ§= 22500 878%8328-00womÂ£0700Â©99000000000000 0%04 00*2- 00Â©06:azOO)~'W00000000007 iq U.10<oh,FAOS M-#f~-99 hÂ£-cl-u i22'gÂ¥ g E; H. Â£.i2 4~~2~~2' ~-'~2-32-M-H~21Â£-2-~S . Z U.i OorÂ£roo -orgk|~ ~CCOZ- -MID-JOEL.U - 771 BILIc[Bil-=ccm- 2Z- 6<<w -<<0<ZZ<OOW< JI-ZOOf<<<<<<Z<<<0 0- 0- THZO-Ma-~~0-01- U.1 o. Of ~ OUJOZOLL o-a-O-O-O-O-OO.O.a- co Sd *00 . g-1 ocou-1 com z 18* ~ EW w wg223*2ZcOcococococoacou) co< Z (0 #Eo%@EEEWEEGZNG*2*G%~3255M~000000OÂ£00< LU ILI LU LU Ill LU CD LU 111 LU CO O 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- 1- Z 1- 1- 1- Z O J -10 LU U-1 9 0 ~ U.1 m U.1 -1 F LU J Â» U) LU a. OLLO -1 -j JOOLLIUJUJUJUJUJ -J LULLILLIE <C 0 LU oc G (va-k 58 %*EM~ o oo LOGO "o UJOI ULOM4W CE '. 4-oc B 4 0>Ozo.Cr-1-0 Z ~8 2> In 0 *2 562;HI WM w.5-5Pi-PReemJsgzÂ£%-*Sm 00 AOOAOLLIQÂ©O-21- < ILI O LU U) LU 9!-IWE i=III 0 IM 82 BE55%,N,3=- x->>mgi 52Â¤@m %94& Â®z m@ Â§352@55*5@5295&.*8*%Â§8<Â§MWoRRB. 2~3% EE=F@@*im=Â®~MODÂ®o-CD UN- <0 00000---0-MO-Cy* 0522!oukoEGRE@%2081%92*NOUDON 9-Â· CD ID Er O â€¢- 91Â· O- to - O- - 01 91Â· (\1 0 - 0- A- N h -Â¥- 1- -h LU J z DC 553 0 D CD 0 k Z LU D Z -1 3 Z W U.Zoil,1 LU LU < m a Eig I CO Z <LUm 9 3 00 0-000 >n $ m 1- O < CD Z M E D < CO LU -11 < U. ill 0 8 3 - > m0 U.1 111 - m ju. 45 M dge=w=- -ES#z 2< Ed. < On d g Q~M IC â‚¬ U.10 IC Ewoo<I ~Z *z 935:%3@%90&2%:wiw.gnie<E#&802 3% i@ r=<1_,ICDO Â·OJÂ· iri SCO .24-1<06 u.1 -<04 3,-1 LUO -51 .%6221.~i*'L~gwo Cr 53:EmEg>*123fi~TE~2%223%54#K@%3 wgdgE.9, = .59 ==Romm< COm ILLI>U-12:E I CE z*HOBBEE55IjAB:tija: 0@ZEWi @00<OBWBM<0<9*2<0<00,-<zo<<CE,u u,ODO<Brs. 00 U.1 9 -10-M U- 00 0 U) co or c/) NU-lak-k-COS DJO $ Cd 5 J 3; m =5 ~ DramOOS 1801 SKETCHB X LN UNIT 6 80517 , CA 92277 RENDA JOAN R~~TER 80517 L908 1908 31IHM L908 >I O11IHM '8 3O1ll '>INVH1Â¥N L909 E13883M VEIVSEIVE] DIEjaIHAA 'hi 01Â¥NOD ,908 *090 Ela t131N3 NVIAI11OM M 3NllSIEIHO PFOHL NETRE NALD L. PETERSON IAN KAY PETERSON HERITAGE PINES CT SCOE RGINIA SWINSCOE, REVOC LIVING 9 AVE LEY EXT RUN M. REICHARDT ATRICIA A. REICHARDT TRUST HARR Ell MBHIL 3 -1 *HlOWOO 0lk:IV11YAB-~SH~W~11~9 90-30 da X.loWA.lesqO 10!Jls!(] 100409 Wed ESTES PARK ONNIE L. SCH hiP '1HDIUM S31EIVHO OF AMERICA DEPT INTERIOR ATRICIA M. TUCKER 1Snll 318Â¥OOA3B 83>11Â¥M -IN NHDRVA '>1 1Snli H39NnOA VHBLEIV 08Â¥GOOM ZOOZ '5 L 4)]eW opeiolol 'Mied se:sa -1 LO 44 0 S / 1 f S <yal 4 m .7 *,6 4 f . 4 4 Al- 1 f y \ 3 ar / f . Â»*2** I - f f 2 93--- U///iÂ«' =2 4 1 4 -11 21_12"2-..2 , ..4 ./ 14 / 7 11 1 4 1 - t J -Â« i \\\X\\\\11\\\1\ / . 9 '54> : ./64: f i 23 OY)Â£ 0.2 '553, / =0 - a.1.6 M 4 /1 Â¢ f 9_2 1 .<Â« 22 . Z IX / - N /i1 / 34 g /1 X _ -r __ ~ - - I -- 3-Z. /49 41%,f /3Â» 21 _4 e p..5 4 -% DI L--1-4 I 4 r qi kt i.5 / 1 - - M --- $ 1< - / 4 &,f - 1 Pr- 1 / /7..0 I - , w 4 .ke, . 7 - - -- - r.. 61 -- . .21 / I- 4 - ; 4 V I - .. - O I CO . ZOON . \ =F .14 . \ C , i /. e. 4 441 I â€¢ 2.Vi / , , 11 , 691 / D i t al / 20 1 / , ,. ' r /2 12 2 v, Ev 2 Ul , \ 11 94 L Z. :11 1 .. ES# ~47 / 2 2 I. - lili I.-- - - ~91-: 3 fee %.8 4 11 LUWUILLIUILLI 7 /' .1 0 lAM,AtAMâ€¢A U /' 1 / C. .1,H I 1 <<<<<< , //4 9 Z Z Z OC Z Z \ -- I 1- Al 1 - ./. L -- aAMCI Al!UnwwOD - C - . i i Il]1111-111111111111111111 TTI-mi Manford Driv anuaAÂ¥ 0!Pois â‚¬ 15 Â® I Â®â‚¬ Â¢ I 97 1 2/26/07 - 8/31/07 6/4/07 - 8/31/07 6/4/07 - 10/30/07 6/4/07 - 1/1/08 5/5/08 - 7/25/08 5/508 - 8/22/08 FEEFI Apuoilonils!40Je 900Z '6 L AInf 1 4 rl Â© ' I 11 ill N f i /0 / 00..0, .... . P- -----4.------. Â® â€¢'LE 4 4, -: 11 \ 1 1 r I .iii n 4-g -----7 st' ,-1 i 3 11 1 Â»- 1 Or, o A UJ i-- 1 t g . \ J ./ 44 li ex 1. # 11 lili 11 A . . -11.-r .0 + - /2 --40 L.' 17.1 11 -- I -011 -# -- --. 4 .- 1 --- ---â‚¬ ; 4 ' 8.*III 4/ 3/.Aol -- 9 / 11 - t - R it~ ! U Ill % P - â‚¬ - #1 44 0 - Ar-- 0 ----- -.to 1 a, / 1 .3.VIS D...... ~ L <killc "T - ---- ' ~ e : i. Â® 444 4 + ie =El 4g& 4.6 - rit--li -- -1 1 1.5 34 F 5.-f , V Â«9 .1 1' : k i .1,-%' 4 1 1 - -- - '' 4, & 11 r/9/1 'Aft Lk /11 .8 5 7TksÂ·=Â·'.2'L..2..32 1 'k'.1 11 f.- -Â¤ . 90:r :. 1 ' Â·3 /37 - 1 4/ f26 \.eli - e. /4 I tle 13 3 V '' . Lu '1Â« z o 4 .a 1 1 N L , f , 47 1 @ = 0 1 4 /- ----- L+-1 < f. 1 -rl 0 lA O LD a- LUD 2 1- h 2 2 f -' - 6.1 - -' 1# ' f 1- 1-U 01 LL i= 0 3 X LU ---- 3 SNÂ¥ld bl0013 11.1,11 '01 ~ ...Ol ,â€ž11Â¥4$ INIA'.1,~ . Ld~.1 100. ao v.015 1..641001 1~)INÂ¥10]W ~ iNA'Ir~1101 1004 ~~ette,~ if)01 DNIMPIMS ~Wpill L)WAN;'i ueld Joold lind NOIDnkliSNOD MBN | ?FEEiFI ocuo'10 nils! 401 I, E 1/.7/ hyÂ·: ..2Â¥ Jit: 1/Il' ./FLA r ././ 4. 35. ii 2 -J.#~.:-' 1â‚¬~6= ?95' - 92%Â» . r.: Â·Â·*... Â·'*.4 .-4"'UW.':t~ .7 ,::. . Pi * 900Z '6 L *Inc Â»4 I r AN -:t".* 1, 1 ' 137 - fo 1- â‚¬,0 1 till 4~141 ~J F.~4:~N~b ft Ar k - 64, L u , Â¥ar.' ' IL i. Â¢ 0 ... 4 /2 W 4. '' -4 . JÂ· li,i , 1 1 f: .7,1 1 - .11 -- 1-Tr"-1 1 i j., i.--Â·4Â· ' :Il 'I ' l' 1~ r' '/ I * |' I| M rÂ· ':03~~Â·~' // c f.itdt 10,9 1 1 - ,#tiF LAI 'Â·' rh , ' .'Nia . 1: 402 1 9 A & 1.41 . ad, f Der-- il.,J. .7. - 4 1 B> 'ha: 1 2 110:1'Â·55-. , '- .. i . f14. 22-4 e. 1 e.Â· ii 2 L. r.. Mil , , t 3 ~ M'â€¢WA i 1 1 O ...2 1 4 C ,//Mill.../i - -- , 11@1. . -a r 1 1UC01 -71 r.r-Â¥-- 1 1 3 , 4 0 D 'I. 41 4 - =1 11 J -~ -j '4. Â£ 3. (4~+23 11 -- 1 1- . i I . t, In U. 9- *1 11 1 0 Imf, 1 Â·.. DTIK Ill 1 , , larl m.. 1 (1;1Z 4....... 1 - I 3 Â«Ft''-Uci 4.4 'AA.F : re: ilil. tr} - El .jul, , , .-- i .117 n 1 4- Itt 1 1- i 1 .1 1 + ...'int.4 4 IM :fimtlittirmmt ==22-- . ---Li...Lki'.1-$/I~'a 1. , â‚¬ T 1. 'tly'ht t~ 1 1 7 - : ign a tii. f r 11 11 1 1 . ~,11:. 4 !:4 0 i,t , '. 4 . 1., . ...5 - .. ILLÂ· Â·Â· 1 4 1--- . PW.-1 :-i Â·Â· 1 "6 j 1 --r 4 0 1 4-r - 7 .1 1/3 lal j' h b 7\ 1,9171 11 -Lib e: 2 - I -~ /"015 U. 4.-k I l./4 1 :,4' + 1 1 C 6-Lk - i /~ fl 11111 U El 211 ! 11/ I. r , 6 34 M i i =1 - L I! 1 - :11, 7 -- 1.1 1 Pt i lieti 1 5-,TZ!8 4 i 4#rl 7 ki i __. -I- ' -LIM/f ElÂ»f~/ - 1 P' '1,1 P. ,"--~1 â€¢-4: -..-.i#_ _ A iti a JI, 4 ~ Lilli qi -; irfu-_3 1_ -1 - T ' 39 . 4 - 4 1~ - 11 J 1 11 >,1 [ b!; 41 ll if? ; 2 + 1 1}1 { i Â·.e : i161 -/ 6/ /J/,3! 3 ILI -- ->- - - -- - -" 1 Lit;i 111!14 0 4 L : 3 1% /. 1 L, 'rip U - 0 .. 7 C 1 : -11 1.,f C - -4 lf]-4,-1 x I----Liql,&,Ht)-)~.) ' 5~j~-1ufT i I 1 -2~ ~11 :~ 1 rs i ti-1-----k â€¢---I/,le:E,~13 4 5* 40161 -1\=Ar W AL r 9NllSIX3 | 13(]OW3bl | SNÂ¥ld 80013 DNOD3S 9 1SBI=I ueld JOO'=I lsJ!:I f el - -~ - SITEPLAN PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT, TOWN OF ESTES PARK n==r A'07'44"**lk 9= 1 9 1C EVATION ILE OUT G 41' LS#6499 LS#29415 wRNE,STONE 1) CUNIOUNS Ant 2 INIENVAL 1-800-922-1987 3@lIT TITLE: 2) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACnON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY VITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ARST COVER SHEET Â·~0 DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE = I SITEPLAN .13[NE...O & (/U. % m=zYINQ K_ SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT SHOWN HEREON. DEn=ID ./ -- N//0"D /* Kh/ JOB NO. SHEET SH[Er 1/0/ NC rip (070) 606-0408 FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND - sm!) 200 CLIDIT: -TES PARL CO. 0061 7 \~/ lai (970) *50-34* SCALE 1" = 100' MEMBER UnUTIES. DRAWN BY AR DATE _M~-liM- 239.004 14 PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHICKED BY _-- SCAL[ AS SHOWN 1 I'l""I'l'/"Il 9. - & F.-.1 -.:B- i.. ' I ./ '. ' -' n W MOW ~ T- ~ -7-XJL i i Ati-rv .. . D . .. : . D I i .0 1 .. 1 I . ..0 .. .... .... 4/' n . ... 1. 1 4 .. ' 24 Ail.W .. . 0 4. : .- .. 2 4 ... .. - . .. .1 0 . . 1 - 0 D . . I. 0 .. , :I .4 - I â€¢ . .4 1 . .. . . I. . I. I . . . .. .... D . // 4 : . 0,-0 'f 4 - - -, . 11 .4 . P : ... . .. 4 .6 'P : 1 /4. 1 1 .1 2 "41 4%-9 / 1//f 94. , .4 1 14 4 , , . 1 / 1% - 4 0 4 e e , 0, 11 6, - f ,/1 0 ' 41 M , 2 2 k . . , 0 0- 1 4, ./ . U .0 0 ...... 4 . m ?i ....."illillili~i~~~~~~~ill~li~~~ili~~~~~~ill".- P474 ' , â€¢ â€¢~ /' 5 '41,/ 4 .*r I , D., p $11, A D r -4 191. 6 3 1 ' 11 . \411 ~ ..4.4 - 1Â¥ .Ed:11 5 D teÂ»' - riA# a - - ~- - I. .-. N.f,ST'i. I / 411 - ... 2 4.4 0 . D '1 2 â‚¬ 6 ' I 0 : 4. 4 - 2 I . , / 4/ â€¢ 4 . iliA. -- 4 41-r , WI.~ , g .."#ali./alia ..14-0-1 - N . 211 3 1 .1 1 . . 11:: 40. A X,&2.-~ I'l ./V D. . ..1 . ,t V , 1 ,-al 4. 442,~ 4,1 - "1:13/1 7// i"whifil -1BI -'fifogr .. , I. 0 -- 1 0 4 A . -. I. + %?47. v =~le.LI : . 0 . 1 1 -2: - V 0-41 . 1 0 + . m .1 '. '. Al,?r " 1 Â® 1 1 0 4 1 1 r. .4 . . ID/2 - . I . :: 1 /%.. . ./ 0 1 1 ....4 I . 0 -1 ...... A F/, . - - . . I . I ./ . ----- -K -- - ./.2- - --r--_ 3, . I. ./ h - - -- - f 45 \ \ \ \ \ f 31 \\\\ \ \\ \\4 /\ \\ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\\ \\\ i. \I /4 1 0-4. 1 924 7:-Nlf i .lit.-~ 91- 1-'-:OK14- \ kiys: .~ 1 ~-/'\ 't~ . 0. N ...0 - . 1 - *1\ i \ . CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION NOTES: CENTER OF COLORADO DAIE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TITLr: .. 1) CONTOURS ARE 2' INTERVAL 1-800-922-1987 SCHOOL SURVEY CORNE*TONE 21EET TITLE: 20 0 20 40 60 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE MIDDLE SCHOOL BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, DR EXCAVATE TO,GrNEERINO & SImVEYINCk DIC FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND DESIGMED 87 -- APPROVED BY KUP JON NO. SHEET SHEET SITEPLAN 16NE mICPBON <~~ (IN) 506-all SCALE 1" = 20' MEMBER UTIUTIES. DRAWN OY AR DATE JAN 2007 CIENT: surrE 200 239.004 24 PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT 59!99 PARL CO. 80617 \~0$7 FAX (970) 586-8#w CHECKED 81' -- SCALE AS SHOWN 1 V 1 2 ... 0/19:1 m . I.- 1 0 014 - .. . â‚¬4 1:-"FF 1 1 -- Â«46 ~ 0 4 , ... . . 1 D ,~11 ... kil e 1. .. I ... 0 449 ... W ... D D \ e . -- - - I . 'L .1 . ... :4 \ - 4 14 - 0 , A 1, i iA*x / \ - - - i ' - - -- SITEPLAN \ - , - \02< \ ---- \\ \4 i \/ \ / BOILER \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ - . 4-*1Â·~ / -7545------1 ~'3%3~ -0 INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL l 1,=s.ROOM \ \ N \ -#8 \ < .\ 1 .//\ -0-I- ~i-I -I--0-.I . Pri I # ---0 \ I --- .x----- .../.--'---- -.-'.'-'-..'"I.li- I"-i.-. ..- -*.~I.'-a. -a-,- r'FRIGA1104# . . ---1 --- ---- 1,4 %h / \- 1 -7550 D.> 1 \\ . -/-1 \ \ . / 0 \\ 0 \ I 0 \ 00 \ \ \ \ IiI I Ill LU ,-r \ \ \ \ \ \ N N \ \ i \ \ -3 E- L////- --,-2 1 i ,/1 \ /11 \/11 /1 it /\ rÂ· \ -- \3-1/ \ IXi / , A r : - - - - - .... 1 1111-C INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE -REE]'00& 4/,Mili BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE " = oES,GED ir - 1-mPY #/ JOB NO. SHEET SHErr SITEPLAN 16992 BIC HIOMPSON (970) 0.6-34013 FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND - - SUITE 200 CLIENT: =23 PARK. Co. 80617 \Â§0 â€¢â€¢I (070> 506-24*0 SCALE 1" = 20' MEMBER U-nUTIES. ORAM IY JU DATE DE ZOOS 239.004 34 PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT OECKED BY -- SCALE AS SHO- 1 1< 1 11 . I .0 1 - :. - r .. 2 0 . D . f * 9- =====â„¢==h = -2=tz==mt=% P . .. 1 - - | . 59. , a ... Im. . ... . . 4 1 . .. 4 1. . 1, . .,% I *. 1 : .h '00/, r. Al ~ ~ . . - 0.1 *,ek ,. : I i ..ev.2,11&*fu<LA . I 0 Â· 6/1,4 4~lk.*.'. . 91.7.. I . - - 04. - 2 ./ . ... . 1 NA 9 '144,2. . 1 ID ... 1 1 1 ... ..- ... 1 ... ... ..- M...il.A 0. 1 , 0 0. ........4 . . Â¥ L 1- -i .1 /~ Ak *'Ft- --- .. 1 + 1' ;6 1 tr Â· . lA .. . . ' I. 1 ....A..........0...A 9.1 1 Â¥ 1.1 1 . 1 - 1/. 7 1 0 ! .. -- -,-111111~~ ' /4 /4 / ///.- . . 0 :0 ./ A. ---I.-IY~~Ill /* 1 . 1 e / 45 7- . S '1 1 I. .: / . A. 0 -1 . ...1. A A .0 . M . 1 liD I e LÂ» .. 1 \11 1 1 \\ 1,\1611 1,1 N 11 li 1 1 .gil 1 xm,-10 ---/ 1 1 1 1,11 \AI1 - / 1 1 I iiI 1 1,1 1 1 - -/U / lili \ <H â€žâ€ž -0- . - - . \ 1 1\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 /- 1 1 \ \~ PAR# 4Â¢, \1 P 1,Â¥41 OREFTS PARK \11\ 1 -- 1 r B \ 1 1 \\ \ \ | I \ TOWN FE*TES PAR,4 1 2 11 ini 1 -ii: 1 1 1 PKDES RIAN\BIKEPATH' 1 ..: \ 1 1 \ 1 ll. 11 111 1 .. i \\ I .- 1 1 \ l \ A\\\4 \1~ld I y'llpl' 1 1 1/ \l\l , \1 1 /- \ 1 \ .- . 1 \ \ 1/\ lili ' lilli, i i El \ 1 11\1 1\ l 60' E ll \ \ \ 1/ 1 1 1 !\ lil 1 1 1 RIGHT -WAY -\~/ ---- \0 1 1 1\ U ----- -- 0 1 I to 1 1 i\ 1\1 1 20 0 20 40 60 . ..A - 1 FINISHED \ h \ . \ \ 1// 6 Iii\\ 111 SCALE 1" = 20' / < FLOOR \ ' l' 1 \1 1 i 7503.64 I 111 1 / /1 ./ 1 \ 4/ ./ \ //1 1 //// CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION - -- .. - 1 1 1/// ,// -1 li \\ 1 11 1 CENTER OF COLORADO 1 / \ \ 1 Ill <,/ 1 1 /l\\ \ \I / ASPHALT v-:; i C Id' 1 / ,//\\ 1 '. 1 4<1 0 '*. ' / 'ii 2 \ 9 A 6 9 1 1 / --- SURFACE / ~ 4--- 4-- K . \\ 44 1 1\ 1 I 1-800-922-1987 , \ I 1\1 1 \\\\ 1 1 lillit --- / i --- / . 1 \ 1 \\\ 4 1 il .1,~\ BEFOLLE YOYU.SM* 31'mANVAE / --- -- 1 1\04\ 11 1 \ // .52 1 5 \ X. / / 118" |CMR . \ 11 1 FOR THE MARKING DF UNDERGROUND / Â£ --- 1-1 I \ i \E lid hi 9 1 11 =-4,1 111 j 1 1 \41 \ L--41 MEMBER UTIUTIES. , / 1 'r r-:r-- 1---------4 1 1 3 1--7 1 Ill le\\ 1 1\ 1 1 IX I -41 Illi i l lili \\ \1 1 1 1 - -1 1 / 4 , 1 4- n r\- 6 FINISHED 1 1 ~fi<~ ' l l 1 l i i B i \ i i \ 1 -- __--~--~ 43. Lâ‚¬*DING 1 " rk:t i i l,\ 'll I / 1 AREA 7509.69 --- -------- --~7 -- %4 /, 11 /1 1 1 --91 3/ -1 1 l 1 1 I l // / --// 60' C - .----1 It< \\ --- lili il , /- FUGHT-OF-WAY L--271- , 1 1 K\11 1 1 1 4 \ < \ N ill zil 1 -- 0 // \\\\ \\ //./ 14' 3 - 1 31 [MAED - 111 1 L.\\ \ I \ \ \\ \ A- .1 \\\\ ....h\ 11 1//Â«0 --1 L l l. + ,\\\ )It op / \\\\ \\.\\ \\\ \\ \ 1 1 / ---r-h.â€ž- . --4< --7/1\ (\ \>A\\ \\ .\ \\ \\\\ h \ 3 i ,\\ \\\\\i 1 1 3% \\\\ FINISHED FINISHED ANISHED 1--3 33- \ h , \ Ky \ \\\\\\\\ i i 4 i 1 1 1 1 i ly i li i i '34 FLOOR FLOOR ~ ~- t---- ~ - 1 -- -~c~=4-4*12Â·1-4---6 - \ \ 0>1 \ ~\ \ \ \\\\ \\\ --/ . FLOOR 1,4-4.-644, -ii I \\ \\\ \ \ \ \A\\\\ r. / / 7509.61 7509.61 - : 7503.65 1.4.-1.- 3 1 h 1 " -7 \\\\\ \\ 1 \\ llI Jf/ r U =5051 41,246-4 71 1 L - 4 1 / '76 \\\\A\\\\ \\\\ \\\ 1 2 , 26 '[11]im Â· \ \ \ \\\\ \\\ \ \\i\\\ 1 1 5 Uss>-1 \\\N. #Wil/:9..i \N\. ''.7 V /* C \ / ' ~Lr,7 - hij-----lhÂ«:129- %, h Â· i.li:::3, i: Iliiiiiiiililiil\lilli 1 1 \ U. Â« 1 ..2':22hu,A *' W.7,-1-31 \,3Â§~50*XE-1-\ / / , ... 1 1 \ \ \ \ \\\ / // / 21 -- â‚¬ --P-- 195 K-?X / -- ....:22......i i i i i i i i \\ 1\ i \ 1 1 1 li\ \ \\ 1 / 1510 FINISHIED~~>~ L.-9:~ 4--- \\ \ \ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\ \ U\ . FLOOR l,34:- -:-1~. 2*rd---ab<~// , i li \\\\ \\\ \1\ 1 \ / / 7509,59-1:7*i----- .1,0 1 vnÂ·.0 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11) \ \\\ / / \1/ , ' \\A \ 1 // FINISHED - 05:P FINISHED AN/SHED ../. hÂ»Â«Â»mou. *iN *esx==m--31 . Â«\1 J 3 3 H Th \20\ f \\V h / 7509.65 Ili \ / , Â¢ 0 FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR 1111.1111 lili Il\ \ li 1 1 V. 1 - . 4 7509.65 7503.62.--71=.---2:G --1.4)> -: --* Â·'~ ~ 1 1 11<, Al f.â‚¬3.- 1 21/ -,Â§23%6~ ,---i-t ?Â·. ~IÂ·----g:-Â·-4 FINISHED . dp Kzw ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 11\ \\\ \ \ \\ \ 1~ \\ ,-- 4 / - tt \\\ \ \\\ ro 1 111 . /-. 5 --: i -7~ n~k. 1211 i Z;3 --3 -1 --2 ~i: U I,----t FLOOR .. , 4 \\ 4 ill i \\ AL ~' r r'r-r'~~,~{10 - ...=.. 5,- .u. =2~i .'- 1 FINISHE[3 \\ \\ \ / 11 . .7 .. t ..1 7509.64 .. \\\ 7 12 2...1.: > A J.>5<.J.i----b )2--:-2.--,-'. f-1 FLOdf< 2 + 1 \\\ / / ,&4 -~ .1-4 -â‚¬~i. I.- :~- --'-,- ,-:..1~~13Â§09.64 41 il I <liiii\'illi 1 -ill ii i lil + tiKild~ljl FL-3 \\\ \\\\ m \\\\ F.-44 .â€¢.- Z ....111 ,\\\ \ 11\\\\ \\ , \ iwi Cio - Â«fl 4-9< 2- 1 .... ~ --. .-.4.. - . L#Â·'fâ€¢ i -' lili I l) 1 1/ill\. il\\ li \i lilli lili 11\3 \\ \ \ \ \ \ li\\\1 4.-4 / \ I\\i R i i 1 ~ i 1 1 1 1 !\1 i\1\ \ \\\\\ \ ~222-9-642 6 n .--9- 1/ r.-4~lili -- -*. ....~r>r/ : HIGH SCHOOL 1 ||| -- ---*-9 -- -- // / . Al 3--f..Â· =. â‚¬...-0 : .. 2 1': ~ ~ ' ~' '' ~ 9 Ll l. C : 1 m - 11. L\:\\ L.L.6.1\44403 -> 2 ~ 2 -2-v/t-~ 1 1 \ 1 / 1/ :1 / -\5~> \\ -01\ FLOOR /-- FINISHED <-6 -~ #~~ 0â‚¬*ISTI,Kl \\ ' 1 15'\ \\ 3 .... ... I.-Il ./-/....... \\ li 1 1 7509.65 -' \ \ \ i. \\I.\... \\ \\\\ ~ ~ ASPHALT 6-7.-. fi-Ii~~ / 1 I lic.I.3..-il 4731__ ----- 1 191 FLOOR .-3 . \...\ . \ \ 4 \ - . \ \45.\ \. \ 4,(1, 1 - \ ~ SURFACE \~ =1 1 FINISHED Qi:2791 9 -1 . 4 .. ...... ..::T:.4.. ..02.2# \,\\ - \ \ \LIEÂ¥, A -41> ./ \.. \ \ / 1 7509.6lt--Â·I-,1.=:b- 0-)-1. ... \\ \\/\ \ -\\.0.... .\.\\ \ .4-- - -2- - , \\.\\ Â· -Iml Tiv-/*./.5 'i .iii... .:291~.a.rs : a \\\1 ---24\\ 1 71 ...0 * U.1 \\\\ \ 5 \ $ 48%62 \ 0- \ / \ \\\\\* 00 - \ \\ --- - \\ \ \) \ \ \-- *--- -- \ \~~\ \ 14------ \ -% NEWÂ©M:Ae\\ \\\\ L ..0 70\\\\ \ \ 1 0 f \\\\ -- --N\\ \\ \ \ Â· -â€¢i 7509.64 ~* 43~ \\ \ ' 4'i.- f--*1 -- C W 71 -- . \ - FINISHED ~ -~ ~ x .* %635.-- / \\ \20 ---\ \\\2\\\ ,~0\ - FLOOR / N x- - 7 ~--7515-- , \ 1 .9 rj.,i. 1,3- -'.m-'- 1 9 -- rr, 3 1/Ah L_LI'v \ |/ -it; *-/ :-1- I- -- i-- ..4 5 030, -- /4 i y \\\ 030.Z--0-==229--1=---4... LAATAÂ» 47 .L J.)3) - I.- III, - ta-9539Â»4\ '24.6 < \\\\ - .202\ \<\ - \ /r, 8Â£y#UL.-SM - 1 - <5> * - --- -- 5. \ 1 1 r 4.- f. --33?!91~ELED ~~peWN:% . i. :.P--1i A......li;z-.-, t--~-1-2- :4.-- 2- -- r~ 5,4. \ 1 -7 42 1 1 5 1 - ---226\226Â»112:00 111 \ 1 3 -.1--L \ -- .5 \\ \\ \ \\ ...1 / -4.<-43 - - 3 lL J.)2 \2264Â»\\ \ \ \\\\ -- -- .- t: I. \\\ 1 .1 -- 7tba / -- -'.0/ - -- .204.0 0 06 lili< \ O FLAG POLE -- -1 t -- I :4Â· . M. - %,lfr- Â· -- \ *- .0:ty:Â©\\\Il lÂ· \ \ i 72-Â· fit /2 -: >k - \ \ \1 \\ \ \ \ 4~ FINISHED FLOGRO FINISHED . \ \ 04\ \\\\ \ \ : 3 FLOOR \,\ 1-/-/ (2 // 0 \\\\\\ \\\ ---- --- 74...2-0 -0-Ji %- \ I \ \\\\ \\ K-- t.-1 7509.60 \\\\\\ I \ \ I ....\ ,-. 18"*26" CMP / \ \\ \\ 1 ----------------------13433:42 - - - \\, - % -- ' 10" RETAINING n INV=7508.00 \\\\ WALL ~ / , --7510-- - \* \ 1 / --- \ ---- \\ I / / // \ B PVC OUTLET ,-- i ------- / 11Nv':~OO1UTn-ET 'L *(N~TUJ~K~ 1/ , 6- R/M=7508.81 -- /NV=7506.71 ./ - - -- -- 7 =7 - - ./ --- ~ \ . llj/ ; \ -7510-.=* ]Il lilic/! DATE: REVISION: BY: PROJECT TlTLI: NOTES: .. 1) CONTOURS ARE 2' INTERVAL SCHOOL SURVEY CORNE,STONE 3UIT TrTLE: HIGH SCHOOL INGINnRINC}& t'/ci 3% =*VEâ„¢Â«kiNG DESIGIED BY -- APPROVED BY K- .JOB NO. SHEET SHEET SITEPLAN (070) 000-2468 CLIENT: 18789 PARK. CO. 80617 ~ FAX (970) 584-341 DRAWH BY AR DATE DEC 2006 239.004 44 CHECKED 81 -- SCALE AS SHOWN PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT - ..' ~.' 1 \ 2 I f ,// I . I j EMS ///// f EXIS-BNG ff \ x ~6 ,~ A SPHAL T ; :/ , I >a : / I / . . irt -r,r-nal.v i ikie / \V / a3 - 20 40 20' 1 \ f-j T]ES SHOWN ILABLE TO CCURACY 5, STORM _INES OR AS LL UTILITY 1 E WITH ALL 1 BLIC -1 LYTHE NTS AS Got- 4 DATIONS, plÂ© 1 0402 I $ No. ./. I ounm M 0Â© 1 W 1 D TELEPHONE LINE D OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNE D FIBER OPTIC LINE ED CABLEIV A ED ELECTRIC LINE D OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNE D GAS D OVERHEAD LmUTY :D SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE D WATER VALVE D FIRE HYDRANT ED STORM SEWER MANHOLE D STORM INLEr D FLOWUNE. CURB & GUTTER ED CONCRETE D SPOT ELEVATION :D MINOR CONrOUR D MAJOR CONTOUR ED UTILITY POLE D STREETLIGI-IT D LIGHT POLES J ED FENCE D WATER SERVICE W/ )PAND METER PIT D SANITARY SEWER SERVICE NOUT D DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW D SWALE D EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTE CONSTRUCTION D HANDICAP RAMP ~ -2 = 4 16 9.-4_0 <. Diii p XOLLIJ lilli 00. 4 - 12- 111 D ISSUED FOR SD: 2 69 ISSUED FOR DD: ' . 4 ISSUED FOR PERMIT: ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION: ENT PHASE DRAWN BY: DAH LETE CHECKED BY: RA 2020AD LUCTION Cl.00 c=in?1&3#= Jas '13340 lOOHOS HDI H >IEIVd 93193 Drawing Name: X:\IN I IHWES I 1-'HU,tu I bu~UUO rrumul 3\1'04 -0,0-uu wa I tz, 7-IMI, 1,1 I tnl,lit wIA I c Mr,w il,un ourlvuL.,4.,rvt,Â¥,1.ge,4.1,1â€¢Irâ€¢=crÂ·~1â€¢,u rw,%,g.nign gur ww-mwi i ,-â€¢.lvrr-w,- vw_â€¢ w. w.wâ€¢â€¢- : E-El 10IbllSICI 10OHOS MI=1Â¥d 9NllS NOI1llOIN be' ... .. A ... A 02Â· 4 , . . 1 04 . . *94 004044 - 0 0- 0 - D,#.e ... . . A 0 - : 0- 0 ... , I 0- 0:' 0- I - f AI -- , . 3,0 4, .1 .. N. .... -. 0 - .. Â¥0 .... . ..m I . I - 0 .. 1*,621]lill . = -0. : I - -0 . ... .. 1 V 11.t. -1. . eâ€¢ +40, .. .. -.1. 1 ... CIm \ I..'bl/121Â¢~ raimil . I .... A /1:5/lill f 944 -..... \ tw '9 -2 0 .... \ . . 2, ..9 0 .&;,1,4 :404 2 - I ..... -1. . . /4 &0;95; -4-40*4004- -.-. 4%24: . e- ~,~ . ... .. r H . . 0 ' '0-0-$-0.Vb-+W . D - 4 -- I .- ..... 1-# . ... â€¢ 0 . S G .. . 0- 0 .. - .. .. -1 . 0. . . . 0 . 0 . . ... .. . .. FWIF D S EweET' 0 -I . I . e . , \. . ' \ (F .... - f ' 4 \: \ 1 .e 2 \ , \ ...4 , rÂ« / 1 , '4 \. 0 , \ \ \ \ \ 7 .-- \ \.... 't I . 1 \ 4 - 0 0 . , \ / 1 - 0 , 1 / J I , 2 t // 1 ' ' 1 1 . .. : 1 C .: . 1 \ 7 2 *i PROPOSED SIDEWA ~ CHASE W/WAFFLE PLA 1, 0 PROPERTY UNE / LIMITS OF _/ CONSTRUCTION EXISnNG CURB _j & GUTTER r EXISTING ~ ASPHALT : L EX/SUNG CURB j ~ & GUTTER L . -<i<l .ki<.' v<v ric \6 â€¢: 0 1 .TION: -h u 14 W J\ f - 111/ / / DRAWN BY: DRH 1 \\\\ic ' 2020AD <k- -k \*b, 2,\ 1 (2.00 \\\llc \\\\\\ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1* i \ 50% COMPLETE CHECKED BY: MA 0./i\\\\\\ 1 LOOZ'LO'Â£0 8-bl 1OIbiLSICI 10OHOS >IBVd ....-........ . L A. A 0 .0 - D . . . 0 . A ...A . ....2., " ... 1 47 - - \ .4 0 - . . 0 - .- -A. ...=. \ X ... I. I. ... - A- F ... -;0,2 . --i' p 49 M . . .. 0 . .. ./.4 I . - . .. 0 Â· ...1 " ... .. . -- - f .. " . I . U . ,. 009- 0 . ... - . 0 - .. 0 \ L 11#- .0 0 . -0 0 - 0 10 .4-- ..7 .0 0 , 11-441 e \ 1 1 3 9 N- I \ . .1 4 'Mil-/Ill/Or*Iqll/AW % 1 ... * Alle"EM/1/11//hniniv 0. 0 - .. . . Â·Â·*Â· 0.2, .... .... ... 4./ s 0 0 - 0 . .. 4 V. - Alf f. i .0 0 \ \ 4 \ \ 4 ., t ; .... .. \.... . 1 j r . ' 1 ! i 1 ... . A 6 1 ER 000 I 9 1 813 / r . 2 NOTES: i i /1, Â· 1. ALLPROPOSED RETAINING WALLSSHOWN SHALL_ BE DESIGNEDAND -p. x i CONSTRUCTED BY RETA[NINGWALLCONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR. 2. ALL- PRIVATE STORM PIPE SHALLBEADS N.12 (ORAPPROVED EQUAL). \ I 1 J i 1 ... i 4 . 80 44>~\ EXISTING . . i , , .// 1 I 7502132 0/ji , 3# \ ASPHALT EX WV><L . f - -v --- 0 -4. , UUMNSOFCONS71MJCION # -Â·730/67 20 10 0 20 40 1 .// PROPERTY UNE gea .1 1 51 i SCALE: 1"= 20' EXISTNG a FENCE ~ : t *, TEMPORARY EROSION \- Slm OR WOOD POST CONTROL SLT FENCEE i MAN FORD AVENUE UMITS OF TEMPORARY EROSION ~,Â·~ ~ ~ ,~ ,' ~' - 2 : Â· Â· FILTER FABRIC CONSTRUCTION -~ONPOL SIU FENCE ~ 7507'990 EC)A EC)A ~_._-\J IEOT 1 i -- O EGA 7.90 7.66 1/ As~roopl PROPOSED SIDEWALK - * 9 \\ Al 1160 1 CHASE W/WAFFLE PLATE - , 0-0 PR0PER1Y UNE Crm.) 750&96 EX EL L 1 - 1, ' l . k> 1. - --~ x 0 1 Blv. ~11 9.30 1 00 r.- 4 111 ; ..4 Â© UMITS OF .- 1 |~1 INCH Â©aÂ© i Â£02 i g29 C Â©Wro 1 MONÂ© I EX#SnNG CURB & GUUER I 751175 Er Sr\\ IS UMITED TO 0.25 ( TER EACH STORM 1 ONE HALF lHE HEIGHT ~ 751125 EX EZ./ % ; ' -Â· ). REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL 151150 9 78C ~~ 1 IUTARY TO A SEDUENT iSUREE. 751288 EX AL~ 751113 EX TBC~ - EXISTING \ 1 6 , A SPHAL T 1\ .1 i i EXISUNG CURB & GUTTER ~ 1 I 1, --1 0 0 .... C) \ L ./ 00 I 0 I CL LU co 00 % LU a \ \ 7 t<UL .& 1 1- M -1 -14 ./ I. :/ I -964 .~/ .ZO rek:424:\\/944.*v-.2*. '. =Qir ~ 442 '1.-2~93y -$A IL [C 2 8 15 424=69-2 3 9- CD Lue 0- ISSUED FOR SO: 2/ / 1. i ISSUED FOR DC): I / 11 41% 1.9. - . .\1\4 1 \U...../1,}i. -4 '. ,;,9.SM-=~~%~~- - - - *.- -I- -- Ilp<.4*4. Wig 31, r:~.4,2934*ir-4.9 11(,/ ISSUED FOR PERMT: - - -... : 4/.- [ i SIDEWALK CHASE DETAIL ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION: U - -7-r 1 9 61-xyl~t<ti i. \\:ze <-* 4\1\.1, \9:,1 - / 11!8 ......- / i /' l 11 i 1 2 i i- ':i 1 hmuNG Â»Â»\ \ :1 i I il.. Â·---. STORM SEWER 1, DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 1 DRAWN BY: DRH Fa, / /1., <t \ CHECKED BY: RA 11\Â«4\ -U\Â«~Â»Â»0..\1 '11 50% COMPLETE Nk. 11 4 2020AD 1Ii,5 1 11.2 / r 99: 1\\46 4\<':.~ I<.\.1~~As:fl & 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - fl l~ i jilll , â€¢ / ~ /~ .-.,-- --------- , ...\ ~:li*p 1 (3.00 -\ <\. A ~- ~~ ..V \ ./ =01 11'yo/\V UOU:11'yVVV UUM E 330 '133110 E-13 10IbllSICI 9 47 --im--2---~--IME-------IMEF - - 1=iEEE=Em<Emiliaimmilig#gg~E ' iEiEEBEE<<EXEE!5%<EmE<EE=- 1/ Ar'.7- ~AW-/WA-~-~- = ========- M / . . .1 .... //8/*PMB/'All/ A...........9 <D . 1 . 0 - ~~/637//1 . .1 0 0. ... 0% 00 . .mil=[1=1 = i , 007 li ./4 ..0 .- - = - 11- -- = . I. 1 -- #'2-" I . I /: - I . I ..2 . . 1 1. :.I . 0 - . .. " , -, . 3, 1. 2 . ... . .rriFyiâ€¢ 0 . . .. 0 - . ..e- . \ e .- k. ' \ 1 ~ ,$*,1~83~~~- ...... 0~~~00000~00,1, . .. / 01/*/illiliallilim"~0, - I . . ... \ \\ . -tvt-0- \ h \ \ -.-0-0---000-0 -- -0-0-0-4. ~~<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \\ '. -0-0000000-tit . -I----'-I.= ~.Nim .L A 1 \ I .0- 2. \\\ :I . e 7 \ . i.\ 11-- 4 EXISDNG WATERMAN ~ ~ . ' Â·.~ < * \, ~0 -Â·, ~\~ 0577NG ARE f<b - ~t Â·5~ Â·. ' --~ (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ~t N \, : * ~ . lo Â·~ \ HYDRANT ASSEMBL Y ~ 5 1 \~ i _ ... 1 q TO cousmucioN) CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER oF COLORADO EXACTLOCAVON ~9/07 -'%~~ V. i: 9,14Â«699>l . i~ ~ 2Â·1987 1 . I 1 800Â·92 /0 2.# 2 *-1---11 , 1 # 1 : I ./-Â·. 1.)c :i ./ ....... 2. - ./. . .1 \ 4\ ' I. f / EL 10 0 ' 20 7 t SCALE: 1" = 20' & DlCATEDACCORDINGTOTHEBEST TEE THE ACCURACY OF SUCH EWER, PHONE, TV) MAY NOT BE LLALLUTILITYCOMPAN[ESBEFORE 1, )RD]NANCES, CITY OR STATE. ASE ABAN, WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY (CON PRIOR JND ELEMENTS. BUTALL i TO: FOUNDATIONS, GRAVEL FILLS, M \0 21 Â£27. < : (C PR; - REMO D0S11N PROPOSEDTELEPHONE LINE Â©1 PROPOSED OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNE ME - PROPOSED FIBEROFTIC UNE - PROPOSED CABLETV - PROPOSED ELECTRIC LINE r - ' PROPOSED OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE ~ EXIE PROPOSED GAS < ASP PROPOSED OVERHEAD UTILITY ~ PROPOSED SANITAFY SEWER MANHOLE < - PROPOSED WATER VALVE PROPOSED ARE HYE)RANT PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE 4 PROPOSED STORM [NUET < . - PROPOSED FLOWUNE. CURB SGUTTER ~ / PROPOSED CONCRETE < 1 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION I . PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR ./ , PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED UnLITY POLE PROPOSED STREET LIGHT PROPOSED UGHT POLES 1 - PROPOSED FENCE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE W/ CURBSTOPAND METER PrT PROPOSED SANrTARY SEWER SERVICE W/ CLEANOUT PROPOSED DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW - PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTE UMESOFCONSTRUC:nON PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP IST ?IGATION IEAR FEET W POINT CT MHOLE ERHEAD ELECTRIC ERHEAD TELEPHONE ERHEAD UTILITY )ESTRIAN EASEMENT INT OF CURVATURE INTOFCURB RETURN ~~~ INT OF INTERSECTION INTOFTANGENCY LYV]NYLCHLORIDE INFORCED CONCRETE PIPE OF DRAIN HTOF-WAY = HT NITARY SEWER ~ ATION RM DRAIN PIPE < 1RM DRAIN MANHOLE NITARY SEWER MANHOLE _EPHONE - RUST BLOCK P BACK OF CURB P OF CONCRETE U) 6 P OF STEP P OF FOUNDATION UU u) POFWALL DICAL ,- M UTY EASEMENT RIFIED CLAY PIPE RTICAL POINT OF INTERSECTION RTICAL POINT OF CURVATURE (10 % RTICAL POINTOFTANGENCY LU o ,TERUNE 0 Z iz 6 520-SR X O 111 -J LU 1- O 0- ISSUED FOR SD: 1/ ISSUED FOR DO: U U. ISSUED FOR PEAMB: 2/ ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION: 2, DRAWN BY: DRH -1 LAWINGS CHECKED BY: RA 2020AD - LETE Cl.00 OOT Nms 'puow podsoid isE 0292 SE508 'PWQIQL) ~SU!1 -- =11 IN=l/\V =11UUMM bUS k 1OOHOS Abl Â¥1NBIN313 M 813 10IbllSICI 100 NOIll10 I . . . ... .-0- 0 I. . I . .. . I A- . 0 - 0 , . 0 . ....... .. D . e-, 1 .. .0 0 1 4 16.. . :.. 0 â€¢e 4 2. A / . * . /4 .. . : 0 - . 61 .... 4, Â» . .0 - . I .. .. 'I ./ / 2/0/Â¥ . . .- I I . .. D - ;1â€¢.lin . ...... . . 0 ... A.....24 .. '. I. A --/ A=KE' .- : - . D- 0 .. =. -. I I 4 - 0 21 . - 1 - . . =.. . /1 . ..: .... I . . 0 - . 1 . ... 0 -A- \ . -3. 11 D. .0 494Â» D / . .. . 0 . . L.A.*00w.#zo , lilli!â€¢liek ..... .. 2,-0,2.41 ...... L . . I 44+44+VA . Â£0 0 .. .. . 1 .-'. . , . 0 4.*- ~,Â»*4** I .4 I +446054/4. .. ~~~~~%$$Â£0*4,Z#46v .. . . . I . . .. .. 4,0:* , I , . . 0 - 0 0 : .4 ./ .. . L ,~4 V..112. r406?22*69,0- I . -4 //~4-- L. .... - . r# 6 4(, . - ... -' I 1 . - - I. ..: A k - Â¥ V.r 1. 1. I . N '8.- *4*7A-5 . .. A I . .. . . ... . a 0 - I 24 .1 4,49:*1*,111'Vilir .. - 4 . .. A - .. yer 0 ... 2 / . 6 ... Â»7%4 . 1 ~<f ftÂ¢.AAA" . - I IL 6 4:4:~~:01~t:,F~lily 19Â¥*24$466 Â¢17 4 A. \ A-A 0 . 0. 0 .... . . . I 4 -4 /1* ... H / 3 -IMIN,-Â«Lf .--- . . .-i. t.' ../. ... . . . I . ... I m. . I - . 4 - 7 1. .... ~1-I - N ./ . i \ jl kqt/7/1 -- / 1 5 e. 0 I. - Â« 1 4 \ e 1 Ic . 0 . I . I . \ - --50,0,-,0-:~ .L - : . 1 1 / 1 - . ' - ....j,4.4 #.4,/67 \ . â€¢ 0 . . \ 4 ...... 0 . .. .-. ////3 , . â€ž 4. 1 - I.- I 1 N. 9. .6 : . .' '// I Â«\ \\ --4 V .0 ..1 ..: 0 . 40 = - e '1 -W. ki,a,*~ C.. a .. -. G7:1,17771 . - A. - . .... P ... A),4 li 40 04 '4/ . - Al'llill - A#21~5 . . r . e / - I Â·/ , . W ... . A.. e. e ... e â‚¬66 0 0 0 . , A / i / j % e.\ N $\ NOTES: / // 1 /AN -1/ 4 // EXISTING WATERMAIN u.n=/Ai.......0, V 744\ 1. EXISTING UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS & PRIVATE UTIUTIES SHOWN ELEMEN1 SCHOI V- P\ 20 40 / / Ae I PROPOS 1" = 20' CHASE W/W 1 - ASSUMED LOCADON OF- ABANDONED 8- GAS UNE 0 (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCDON) RELOCA i *J WAI 1 \ 4 L--- --..Â·Â· c .--Â·Â·-.. - ,<~ ........ ..... .._...â€ž-_. I.. ASSUMED LOCATION OF â€¢ EXISnNG TELEPHONE UNE # (CONTRACTOR m IR/FY 7 16.0.42 PRIOR m CONSRUCHÂ® ~ | 45Â· BEND CONNECT TO EX 6' WATERWAIN W/45' BEND ' (CONIRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) 00 4 EXISTING EXISTING 6- WATERMAIN ASPHALT (CONâ„¢ACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCAMON PRIOR TO CONSmUCnON) W. . 2 1,14+ 116, JAI X42 - E>OS-RNG r -I-=J 71- Â»cÂ« - L *#-- ~ - -:i 1 2|12 11- - X UMITS ( CONSTRUCTm -- J EMS,ae WA 270*UW IN L C L UIZE IN. 1 IN. .-. IN. -1 ////0--IN. O N CE HZ-J O 0 iZ U.IME IOD 11 1/4' ISSUED FOR SO: 1, (FT.3) ISSUED FOR DD: 1/ 4.4 ISSUED FOA PEFWIT: 2 9.7 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION: 2, 17.2 26.3 000@04 gy 37.6 EXISUNG RRE /99 19 le.., 51-0 3: PROPERTY LINE 16 240.9 130.4 66.5 9 45 99 GRAVITY ANCHOR DETAIL HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 7 NTÂ·S - /02\ \ DRAWNBY: DAH .. 2 - Â£ CHECKED Err: RIA 11- -------- T -t-- ------------- .. 7 ----.................. - - / ...---. ---.-/ 5. p T CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 2020AD 90% COMPLETE C2.00 BRODIE AVENUE - L+L8-Â£6* (0L6) OOT InIng'peoÂ·I 130dsold l,EH 0393 Sto-avotot i R15.0 10OHOS Abl V1N3IAI313 M3N >1%dvd 93193 E-El 10IbllSIC] 10OHOS MEIVd -1-WWW 1Â¥1NOZI NÂ¥ld All - i. . 0 ....= 0 1 .... = 0 4.-' . - - .. .... . 0 . .... . 0 . .0 I. . 0 0 3, S 1 - 1 ... . 2 - .. ...0 - . I. 0- . I . A . .. . 0 I . 1,4 1 .. .. . - I ... -.. . ., I .... A- , . 1 . 11 A .... . . 0 , .. .. . ./ . 0 I .0 0 e = 0 ..0- I. I 2 0 1 - 0 -- 0 - ./ b . 1 ..... 0 0/0. I . .-- .- 9/.1. -.. , . 0 , I .. 9 , - . t. Jr -- .. 0 3 ... . .. D 1 0 = 0 . .. = 2 0 0 - , 4" .4 - 4. r ... - . -.. . ... . .0 1, --I . .. . 0 - 0- I I -0 . . - 0. . I , . .. . 0 .. ..... . 0 .: . , 0 . I 4 0 . '. 0 . 0 ftllill~et;04 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 - I Â¥ 0 . . . I. 1 . 4 . 0 ./ .. ... ..1-. -1 .: 9 . .. .... - . 0 0 3 . a 0 . -.. ....9.- . ., - 0 4*k 01 1 t~ - . 0 - 0 - -,Ato .... .. 0. 40 . ...1 . ... .... . . - 0 , '' '' '... f . . - 0 0-090-0-0;60 -0-0-0-0-tvtV â‚¬@,@~.CtÂ» ... 1,;000-tv 00000-0-0-0-0 pa. A .9 4 D. . I . I. I . : 0 - 0 ........ 1 . ... . 1 - '44/4*2:i: 0-0-0-0.0 - 4-0-0-0-4--0 1. .-1020-+Vt-0- ... 1. -,1 I , ...~ 444444 - .. A. A e.. , 9 7,"Ar. 0. A-Ar e. 0 2 .. .. 1 .0 - I 4, , . 1, Ii \. A- .. ... ... \ 401. ... 0 ., . ..- .. .A/.1 'Te, . 0 0 la '. . 0 . I I . .. .. 0 I . 0. A '. ..'.0,-' 1 . ; ., ;.. .4 ..A .... \ .... . I : I ......2, I L; r- I . I . 1 11-- 9 - . 0 , / 1,4 / Im# I .// ~ -1 .5*a / 1 / . ---- -h 1 1. // S ' 1 -- 0 r. / 1 1 , I 0 j.... r2 ,- , $ , 2 1 :. . 0. I : .. -" 1 e /1 D I , ' 1.1 ..'' I ./ 2 1 -1 2 I . ... - . ... . -0 - I ' ' ' I ee .; 1 .... . . 0 . el 11 'AÂ¥ . E: A. 0 1 , . I - . ... , .....:..1 ..0 01 I V' 0 ... , - e. 1 0 ... .. . 0 1 I. .... 0,- : ..A . D # \\ : 0 / .. .. I .0 - 1 L - f - : 0. 0 1 0 \\. I. 1 ... 1 . .- ... - ., /4 0- 4 90 1 i i t \ t- te) A / i . 1 .0.//Ur\\ es A @ ELEMEI SCH 3 0 / \4- Iii f // j.\. ~1 INV. C 1 1 f / l:/ 1 C Â¥ / \4 f 4 1 41 - --4>t~f~Â·4~<175 <44\ - dc 7557.42 Ey M H g: ---/ PROPOSED 02/ TYPE L M 0 / RIP RAP EXISTING f A ASPHALT 158.05 F 17-WIDECONCRE1E-FWI ~~ ( MATCH BOSTING A // C ~ EDGE OF ASHPALT ~ 1 Â· ~ C Y| CONPOL SILT FENCE| 1// Â» ( - 4 >7562 *7563 -4 Â£ LE-ZzlEM_.~1580.2 'PROBMATELY < .~-'L--7566 ----SÂ» IN. X 4 IN. TRENCH L 1 I - 7567 -4 -11 _--4 7568- ttEL=24 7569 - L E -7570 -- 1125.=222=9, 110 --- Â»622. - UMITS- EEN LU )EVELOPER. ~ 00 25 LU m 1- M 0 % --- LU OL \ I \ I 06 OZ 11Â»f go 075 Z | CONSIRUC11 1 <O < roc IJ OLUOOL ISSUED FOR SD: 1/ ISSUED FOR DD: ISSUED FOR PERMIT: W ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION: 2, X . \\ LS# 0.-1 0.\3 1 -. 1 h. 1 1 1 1 4 I - \I.3 X Z ./: -~ 9-ZIC A / Â» Â·Â·--Â· 1 ST FLOOR WEST ENTRY DETAIL IPROPERTY UNEI / -- r-*-- 1 1 -h \ 1 0- .+ 111 ' -- SCALE: 1" = 10' DRAWN BY: DRH i LLit i I ./. CHECKED BY: RA , IN E r CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 2020AD . 7 ; . 1 Â£ f Ve ~,--...~..... .....k....- T ~ 2 ---iL T ---v .-Â·7---- Â·Â·7Â·Â·Â·- p --.~'-';;; -/---~---- , f i -- ' , . NI i- ./\ $ 90% COMPLETE C3.00 I . I r i , 1/ / k : BRODIE AVENUE - EL -*_ ---21*Ll=,--- ~ Â· LU-U. r ~- -wee _u- i - A _ ..~ - 001 0,mg 'puoÂ·H podsoid 'suH 0192 =11 IN=l/\V zliL.1Utltl hUb k 1OOHOS Abl V1N3IAI313 M ~ Drawing Name: XNNTERWEST PROJECTS\2006 PRaJECTS\1054-028-00 (ESTES PARK INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH SCHOOL)\DRAWINGSENGINEERING PLANS\NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION\1054-028-00_GR,DWG 8-13 10Â®LSICI 100 101:31NO Who Plotted: DAVID HOLLOWAY Pht Date & Time: I uesday. rebruary 2/. 200/ 3:25:1 / rM - /2.0 1 - / emne'll L r' m:=Ull =10 -a'601 ..4. 31 . A- . =. D . . - . . 0- , .. m. 1 4.111'EjBPI,1 m.:7-r~ I .ru'll*11. - 41=Ill D-H . vAY 1. . 0. . / 449 ---- ./ I. mAMMI 1â€¢â€¢,2,11:11.41[â€¢.,1 .. â‚¬, .. 4Â»41 - . 1- 042 0 .3 ..1 .. ==IEE. --- 0 . =!~EmmEmammmEEEmmEEE=EEW fEEBEEE<EEES<EEE<XEE-mEEEI - 4 0%44 ~41* . 4 124EE=6===mallImilimmEEE=2 Imi~limar - 1.IMEZE=-a=@Ig=P-- 2maN,Em=E=~-- . . 3. ... 4- SEE~EmEE<Eled#F 0 '' 7 / '1&.4 .. *01 .- 01 1 ..' 21 1. . i # I . I . -1 - . ..1 1 . 1 . :am *1 .. . .. ... I . I I 4 UNENIi- ..W. \.- .. . 0 1.1/.5,219. U .. 1 - .:. /5<~Ikja #illillizill ..1 -0 .... . . + 1 11 11 1 11. i. 0 1 = = 'll- . 01*1 ~ - 0. - -=1 1,/:â€¢Iâ€¢ilâ€¢,IÂ·/ A#r ---- = I = : == - 12-Â· - 0 1Em,T'1IF-11-lf-iN,1 0 6 0. == = ~ râ€¢â€¢1 . - - : .. : ...2- 1 1 ./. . N./1. .. - I . .. . /., I --4 7 -* ly ./I.INA ' '1 .9 Â¥'*la 1. ' , : 1 -,2 . , 9- . 1, \ CE][LIik] 75*.i gixilia - .... 0 .... ILIAL#IRM -- 7.~IN V ... elLRICIA!11121~ 1/liIA'l/d~ ... :. .A 0, 12, , :i /0 1 rucâ‚¬:.8 . - -7 91- 0 /25\ Empliz/'ll' 1Uallti~Zâ€¢121!| 1 - - - r 1. 1. . I -='I . IE'R"84 456.. Imif ki . . 1 .:~ , / 1 - 0 1, -1 1 : 1 ... 11 . /57,1 ~ 2220.4 . . 0 1 ... 0 .. 2 . . 1 . , e .1 1 . - 0 . A ./1. 13,7~711.r,~71*1 1 - . 60/li=Wtia I 9, \ V .1 mfilmijwilimlmvid *<01'ule'llill,l,;litil,lwi 46 f Alle...FMiMi....-- 1 9 - 7,90 <, - 9, . 1 b =E.:144,(Apwi-ali~,04-l-~V - 41.~ , e. B - p.6 I . .1 4,9, I . rETT,TYÂ¥,Emi.,1 ... . 6 . - ..R