The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2007-02-20= F{LE- COP'f -=- Prepared: February 14, 2007 Revised: AGENDA ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 20,2007 11:45 im-.- Study Session, Rooms 201 and_202 1:30 p.m. Meeting, Board Room, Town Hall 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of minutes dated January 16, 2007 b. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE to April 17, 2007 Planning Commission meeting: Kearney Minor Subdivision, Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition, Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC/Applicant c. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, Metes & Bounds, located in the SE 44 of the SE 1/4 of Section 27, Township 5 North, Range 73 West of the 6~h P.M., 651 Laurel Lane, J. Rocksey & Jacquelynn Powell/Applicant-Request to change the existing boundary line between two lots from a north-south orientation to an east-west orientation 2. PUBLIC COMMENT The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments are not to exceed 3 minutes. 3. CONCEPT PLAN, GROCERY/RETAIL CENTER, Intersection of Highway 7 and Manford Avenue Applicant: The Mulhern Group, Ltd. Request: Concept plan review for a new retail center to include a 50,000- square-foot grocery store with a fuel pad and an additional 5,000- square-foot pad Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 4. MASTER PLAN, YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ESTES PARK CENTER, Parcel Identification Numbers 3404106001, 3404200022, 3404300032, 3404400064, 3404200022, 34050000022, 3405000024, 3409100001, 3409100028, 3409200006, 3404200022, 3409100001, 3404400064,3409100028,3404300032,3410000013,3400000014,3404306006,34043060, 2515 Tunnel Road Applicant: YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Request: Adopt the proposed YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center master site plan Staff Contact: Dave Shirk 5. REPORTS 6. ADJOURN The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Tom Ewing, 1082 Fall River Ct., 970-586-3667 We're not going away! I return on behalf ofthe homeowners of Fall River Estates to express our disappointment and frustration. Things are out of control! Nine months ago we protested the licensing ofa commercial business, called "The Celtic Lady's Mountain Retreat", in our E-1 zoned area. At that time we presented our case to the town planners, to the Estes Valley Planning Commission, and to the Town Board. We believed then, as we still believe, 1_ that the business license was issued carelessly and even, perhaps, in violation ofthe zoning code. We ay "carelessly" because we don't believe that theÂ·Plamaing Department did their homework to properly I research the type ofbusiness proposed (easily accessible on websites and in newspaper and magazine advertisements) and also because the owners/operators ofthe business seem not to know, or don't care about the requirements, regulations, and restrictions for conducting a business in an E-1 zoned area. From the beginning of operation there have been, and still are, infractions in the conduct oftheir business which have, and continue to, create disturbance, annoyance, and even danger in the neighborhood. As recently as this past week their flag was lying in the middle ofthe street, on Saturday morning four vehicles were parked in their driveway plus the one that could be seen in the garage, and on Saturday evening, just after darkness fell, one vehicle was parked in the street on a very sharp icy curve preventing two-way traffic on the street in front ofthe business establishment. The business under question was at the time of licensing advertised asa '13 & B". The Town, in spite of what it called itself, said, "Oh, no, it is not a'13 & B"; we call it a "vacation home". In reality, we maintain, it is neither; by definition it fits and is being operated as a "small hotel" in our E-1 zoning. Meanwhile, there is the attempt to legitimatize the business by proposing a change in the zoning code, bringing from the old Municipal Code into the present Estes Valley Development Code the "vacation home" terminology with a host ofexplanations and requirements in order to try to bring this business into conformity with the code. The procedure we observe is, first, give the business license, carelessly, we maintain, then change the zoning code to legitimatize the business being conducted. ' , Secondly, and perhaps with even more serious implications, in mid-December, prior to Christmas, we ~ab*4*~eported to the PtaBAng Department that a model home, a show home for an out-of-town building -7"~ucontractor and an allied real estate company, had been built and was poised to begin operation at 1050 Fall River Ct., on a residentially-zoned (IE-1) lot in Fall River Estates. Five weeks later, on January 26, 2007, a large article in the Trail-Gazette advertised this model home and its out-of-town builder/owner. We neighbors had been led to believe that this building was to be a private residence so, to be neighborly, we put up with several months of dangerous parking on the street of multiple vehicles of all sizes (as many as eight pick-ups or larger at one time), destructive parking ofheavy equipment on 4 adjoining outlots, and extensive blowing oftrash and building materials into neighboring yards. Again 48412Ye have appealed to the PlaRB me Department and so far no reply. This past mid-week there was a pick- .peGrrgup parked on the street preventing two-way traffic, and this past Saturday afternoon there were two vehicles illegally parked on an outlot across the street from the building. We homeowners in Fall River Estates invested in property and settled here to live with our families in a residential area, only now to find out that "residential" means little. Yes, we're disappointed and frustrated. Yes, things seem to be out ofcontrol! 02/20/2007 10:50 9705862459 CORNERSTONE ENG PAGE 01 CORNEASTONE Phone: (970) 586.2458 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Park. Colorado 805 I 7 Fax: (970) 586-2459 Web,itc: ccs-ccc.com ENCIN=R!NG & ~(k~'4. SURVEYING.INC February 20,2007 Estes Valley Planning Commission P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Kearney Mjnor Subdivision Preliminary Plat To Whom It May Concern: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. hereby requests Kearney Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat be removed from the agenda of the Estes Valley Planning Commission meeting scheduled on February 20,2007. A continuance for this project to the April 17,2007 meeting is requested. Please place Kearney Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat on the agenda for the April 2007 meeting. Sincerely, ~.,*, / . Corners*ne EhdA*ring & Surveying, Inc. tÂ«- K*ry #I. Prochaska, P.E. Principal To the Estes Valley Planning Commission, February 20,2007: Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you this afternoon. My name is Carol Beidleman and I live at 3245 Tunnel Road along Spur 66, where we share a property boundary with the Y across Wind River. Our home has been in my husband's family for 50 years, I have lived there for 20 years, and we will be living there beyond the 20 year life ofthe YMCA's Master Plan which is before you now. I am here today on behalfof 130 other Spur 66 neighbors to ask the Estes Valley Planning Commission to deny a component ofthe Y's Master Plan, which is to build 3 reunion cabins along Spur 66 in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit. The timing ofthis hearing is unfortunate, as many ofthese Spur 66 residents are away during the winter. However, their signatures will speak for themselves. You will find in your packets a 38-page copy of a petition letter with 131 signatures. This petition letter was developed and signed in September 2006 after neighbors learned, by chance, of the Y's plans to develop this area along Spur 66. In signing the petition, these residents from the Thunder Mountain, Windcliff, Woodside, and John Timothy Stone Cliffhomeowner associations and elsewhere along the Spur, have registered their strong objection to the Y's plans to develop this beautiful open space along the Spur 66 corridor. These residents expressed serious concerns about the impacts of such development, which would include significant destruction ofnative vegetation, disturbance of wildlife habitat, the creation of new access roads, heavier traffic flow on Spur 66, increased light and noise pollution, and visual blight. With their signatures, they have expressed a strong desire to safeguard the scenic and wildlife values ofthis area by keeping it intact and undeveloped. I would like to read from the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan section on Planning Area 4, Spur 66, under Special Considerations: "Future growth and development ofthe YMCA will occur. Development ofthis area needs to be sensitive to the surrounding property owners..." Given this urging, it is interesting to note that neither "neighbors" nor "community" were included as one ofthe 12 relationships that were important to or considered in the Y's Master Plan process. The Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan goes on to identify the first ofthe "Key Issues" for the Spur 66, which is: "The YMCA Camp is a signification attraction in the area, and impacts of future development must be considered on the surrounding area. The highway frontage ofthe YMCA property is an important buffer/visual/environmental element." If this statement in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan sounds familiar to those of us who live along Spur 66, it is because it was taken directly from the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan which we developed cooperatively with the YMCA, neighbors, and local government officials, including Bob Joseph. The Spur 66 Plan was unanimously accepted and endorsed by the Larimer County Planning Committee and the Larimer County Commissioners in 1997. At that time, the Y gave those of us who worked on the Spur 66 Plan assurances that their property along the Spur would never be developed. We commend the Y for seeking to improve the appearance and functionality oftheir Estes Park Center through a strategic planning effort. However, the inclusion of development plans along the Spur does not achieve either goal and disregards the Y's core values ofcaring, honesty, respect, responsibility and faith. Yet there is a solution. The Y's Master Plan identifies 9 potential reunion cabin sites (see the yellow dots on the Site Inventory map, page 23). Thus there are other sites, not located along Spur 66, which the Y can choose for building these reunion cabins. We urge the Estes Valley Planning Commission to have the Y select those other potential sites which are near the Y's central core area where there is already development, and where there would be the least impact on neighbors. We also urge the Y, which has been communicating with the Estes Valley Land Trust, to place a conservation easement on their entire open space surrounding the core area, including all of the Y's property along the Spur 66 corridor and adjacent to Rocky Mountain National Park. We certainly appreciate that private property rights are involved in this discussion, but ultimately our private lands sit within a framework of broader consideration and responsibility. On behalfofthe Spur 66 neighbors, I ask the Estes Valley Planning Commission to protect the integrity of this beautiful area, which is a tremendous and unique asset in the Estes Valley, by denying the Y's proposal to develop along Spur 66. Sincerely, ' Ate.04 Pel,a,~0 1 .1. , 1 1 ../1 3 U ~ FEB 20 2007 Carol Beidleman 1 6 !1 .11 Spur 66 Petition Signatories Regarding YMCA Master Plan -- September 2006 (131) Adair, Joe Hodges, Betty Strong, Sherie Adair, Mary Liz Hodges, David Sullins, Charles Albertson, Jennifer Illig, Kathy Sullins, Ellen Aldrich, Marian James, 1. Faye Taddonio, Dominick Alterman, Ellie Johnson, Bruce Taddonio, Helen Arfmaine, Bruce Johnson, Carmen Taylor, Bradley Barbieri, Sandra Johnston, Grace Taylor, Deborah Barbieri, Victor Johnston, Roe Thompson, Denise Beckett, Darlene Kantak, Christine Tiemeyer - Vo, Patricia Beckett, K. L. Kelly, Dennis Tiemeyer, Alma Beidleman, Carol Kelly, Maxine Tiemeyer, David Berryman, Nancy Kennedy, Kathleen Tiemeyer, Raymond Bigler, Craig Klancir, Mitzi Tremble, Joyce Bigler, Deanna Konzak, Jeff Tryka, Ginger Blasett, David Konzak, Julie Uhlir, Florence Brady, Barry Kozlowski, John Uhlir, Sally Ann Buckner, Richard Krider, Charles Vernon, Ann Buckner, Sue Krider, Laurel Vernon, Charles Burge, Barbara Kross, Katherine Vernon, Jack Burge, Walworth Lamm, William Vernon, Patrick Byall, Patricia Lehmkuhl, Bruce Vo, Loi Byall, Von Lehmkuhl, Dorothy Voboril, Aaron Carroll, Edward Marvin, Frances Walsh, Joe Cast, Diane Matti, Leo Walters, Bill Cast, Scott Matti, Margaret Walters, Cheryl Clark, Donna Maurer, Robin Weaver, Jean Clark, Margaret Miller, Barbara Wheeler, Anne Cowles, Gordon Miller, Jeff Wheeler, Edward Cowles, Jean Nelms, Grace Willborn, Michael Davis, John Olson, Dorothy Young, Crawford Davis, Karen Owen, Arthur Young, Rebecca Dill, Clifford Owen, Janice Dolezal, Patti Phillips, John Duell, Ronald Phillips, Judith Duryea, Mary Pierce, Alexandra Duryea, W.S. Pierce, Benjamin Finley, Patrick Pierce, Roger Foiles, Barbara Reichhardt, Ann Foiles, Leslie Reichhardt, John Frick, Barbara Ridgway, Mollie Getchell, Edward Riedesel, J. Keith Getchell, Marjorie Russo, Pamela Gillette, Patricia Ryan, Laura Gleaves, Curt Smith, Jack Gray, Alice Smith, Jean Gray, Richard Smith, Margene Hagen, Fred Smith, Richard Hagen, Lois Snyder, Beverly Hiatt, Dee Stormbroker, Ann Hiatt, John Strong, Larry Estes Valley Planning Commission The next scheduled meeting will be held Tuesday, March 20,2007. There are currently two items regarding proposed development code changes on the agenda. You can view information about all current submittals, including next month's Planning Commission items, on our web page: www. estesnet.com/comdeWCu rrentReq uests. aspx RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 2 2.-AFT Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission January 16, 2007, 1 :30 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall Commission: Chair Edward Pohl; Commissioners Wendell Amos, Ike Eisenlauer, Bruce Grant, Betty Hull, Joyce Kitchen, and Doug Klink Attending: Chair Pohl; Commissioners Amos, Eisenlauer, Grant, Hull, Kitchen, and Klink Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott, Town Board Liaison Homeier, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Town Attorney White Chair Pohl called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. and welcomed Commissioner Grant to the Planning Commission. The following minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological sequence of the meeting. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Estes Valley Planning Commission minutes dated December 19, 2006. It was moved and seconded (Hull/Eisenlauer) that the consent agenda be accepted, and the motion passed unanimously. 2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Commissioner Amos nominated Commissioner Hull for Chair. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner Klink. There being no further nominations, Commissioner Hull was elected Chair by acclamation. Commissioner Klink nominated Commissioner Eisenlauer for Vice-Chair. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner Hull. There being no further nominations, Commissioner Eisenlauer was elected Vice-Chair by acclamation. It was moved and seconded (Hull/Klink) that the Community Development Department Secretary or designee be appointed as Recording Secretary. There being no further nominations, the Community Development Department Secretary or designee was appointed by acclamation. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT Director Joseph stated information and public comment on proposed changes to the Estes Valley Development Code short-term rental policies have been presented at the last three Planning Commission meetings. He welcomed anyone present to provide further comment to the Planning Commission. None spoke. He stated the proposed changes are essentially on hold pending further work by planning staff to produce a more exhaustive analysis of the issues for review by the Town Trustees. He stated his expectation that the analysis will be presented at the next Community Development Committee meeting at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, February 1, 2006 in the Board Room of Town Hall; this will be the next opportunity for public comment on the issue. m. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 January 16, 2007 Commissioner Hull thanked Chair Pohl for his twenty-three years of volunteer service to the Town, stating he had been a mentor and friend and will be missed as a member of the Planning Commission. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 06-08, Riverview Pines Development, Lot 1, Riverview Pines Subdivision, 1150 West Elkhorn Avenue, Applicant: Real Estate Investment Cet I, LLC Chair Pohl explained that a packet of information had just been provided to the Planning Commission by Carl Towner, representing Real Estate Investment Cet 1, LLC. He called a ten-minute recess to allow time for Commissioners to review the information. The meeting reconvened at 1:51 p.m. This proposal was heard and continued at the December 19, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioners Amos and Grant recused themselves from participation on this agenda item due to their absence from that meeting. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. He stated this is a proposal to redevelop an existing accommodations site that currently has twenty-six units. The property consists of two lots zoned A-Accommodations, as are most of the surrounding properties. The applicant proposes removal of the existing units and development of twenty-three new units for accommodations and multi-family use. For the proposed development to occur, the two lots must be combined into one via an amended plat, which will also dedicate easements, right-of-way, and so forth. Planning staff recommends requiring recordation of the plat prior to issuance of the first building permit. Two adjoining properties are accessed through the applicant's property via a road that will be widened to meet current road standards; the entry on Elkhorn Avenue will also be realigned for safety. This road is a private road but will be dedicated as public right-of-way. Dedication of right-of-way on the applicant's property will also be provided for a portion of a cul-de-sac bulb, which will be shared by neighboring property owners and may be constructed in the future. At the December 19, 2006 meeting, Commissioners and/or staff expressed concern regarding the proposed impervious coverage, building setbacks, and building heights. The proposed plan has since been amended and now meets the following requirements of the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC): land use, density, impervious coverage, setbacks, and proposed unit heights (the heights will be verified as individual building permits are issued). Planning staff and other affected agency staff originally held a pre-application meeting with the applicant on April 14, 2006 to discuss this development proposal. During the meeting, planning staff expressed concern regarding the extent of site disturbance proposed. Staff reiterated this concern in a follow-up letter on April 19, 2006. Planning staff repeatedly expressed concern with overall site impact and stated disapproval of the plan would be recommended if these concerns were not addressed, including in September 2006 when an incomplete application was submitted and in a letter dated November 6,2006. Planner Shirk noted that the portion of the site on the north side of Fall River was developed in 1997, prior to the adoption of current development standards, with the removal of only four trees and a portion of a stand of aspens. The Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan policies state buildings should be located and designed to fit the land, new development should minimize the impacts to visual and environmental quality within the Valley, and development impacts within riparian areas, wetlands, and floodplains should be minimized. These policies are codified in Section 7.2 of the Estes Valley Development Code, Grading and Site Disturbance Standards. An area in the southwest portion of the development may violate the EVDC standard that prohibits cutting to create benches/pads for development. The applicant proposes extensive and significant overlot grading, and the proposed limits of disturbance cover roughly the entire site with the exception of a small area of non-disturbance near the river corridor. It is staff's E 2 - --FT ... RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 January 16, 2007 opinion that the proposal does not meet the grading and site disturbance standards required by the EVDC. For instance, the EVDC states that limits of disturbance (LOD) may be multiple and noncontiguous on a site and provides illustration of preferred "pockets" of LODs. The Comprehensive Plan states that development along this highway (Fall River Road) should be minimized to the maximum extent possible. Information provided by the applicant's engineer indicates the applicant proposes removal of many significant trees, including 52 coniferous trees and 22 deciduous trees. These trees meet the definition of a significant tree as provided in the EVDC. The applicant submitted a report at today's meeting prepared by Dan Speedlin of A Growing Business, Inc. that conflicts with the numbers provided by his engineer and shows significantly fewer trees will be removed. However, Mr. Speedlin's definition of significant tree does not coincide with that provided in the EVDC. A number of trees shown on the applicant's plans as trees to remain are in locations shown on the applicant's grading plan where either utility line work will damage root zones or cut and/or fill will occur in the location of the trees. Staff recommends that utility lines be placed under driveways where possible in order to preserve trees. Setback requirements for both wetlands and stream-corridor protection apply to this proposal. The applicant proposes adequate screening, including supplementation with native plantings. The proposed stormwater detention ponds have been redesigned to provide native vegetation and meet the Code requirements. Planning staff recommends that each driveway area provide dedicated guest parking. Each unit provides two parking spaces as required by the EVDC; however, not all driveway aprons are deep enough for guests to park in front of the garages. Access may be limited or blocked by inappropriately parked vehicles, which may result in units being inaccessible to emergency vehicles. Also, the garage loading for units 21-23 is designed such that if a vehicle is parked outside one of the garages, access to the other units will be blocked. Staff recommends redesign of this building to address this concern. Three sections of the EVDC require the minimization of curb cuts to the maximum extent possible via the use of shared driveways or other means. Planning staff has recommended the applicant eliminate the two southernmost proposed driveways and load those units from the drives to the north. Planner Shirk corrected information provided in the staff report, stating the applicant will need to bring in fill for the road in the area of the cul-de-sac. Cul-de-sac standards provide for a maximum of 120 vehicle trips per day, which this proposal will exceed. Staff recommends waiving this standard because the applicant could instead create a second access point on Elkhorn Avenue to serve a portion of the units and reduce the trips on the cul-de-sac. However, a second access point on Elkhorn Avenue would create potential traffic hazards. This request was submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from the Colorado Division of Wildlife, Town Attorney Greg White, Estes Park Sanitation District, and the Town of Estes Park Building Department and Public Works Department. A letter from adjacent property owners D. Scott and Patty Eldridge, 1130 West Elkhorn Avenue, was received expressing concern about loss of view corridors, substantial loss of trees, an increase in the number of buildings from seven to twenty-three, increase in traffic and noise, loss of wildlife habitat, and potential pollution of Fall River. Two additional adjacent property owners, at 1152 and 1250 West Elkhorn Avenue, verbally expressed their concerns to planning staff regarding the proposed limits of disturbance. The applicant provided letters of support from the property owners at 1152 and 1250 West Elkhorn Avenue as part of the packet of information submitted to the Planning Commission at the start of the meeting. Significant changes have been made to the applicant's proposal since the December 19, 2006 Planning Commission meeting that bring the proposal closer to compliance with the Estes Valley Development Code. Redevelopment of the site would increase traffic safety. However, it is the opinion of planning staff that the proposed limits of disturbance exceed that allowed in the development code and staff recommends disapproval of the application. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 January 16, 2007 STAFF FINDINGS: 1. The submitted application fails to meet Limits of Disturbance Standards set forth in Section 7.2.D, and in Staff's opinion the grading plan fails to comply with Section 7.2.83 "Cutting to Create Benches." 2. There are several corrections and changes that could be made conditions of approval. These include: a. Number of driveways and driveway intersection design; b. Lighting plan; c. Refine grading and landscaping plans; d. Off-street parking design; e. Amend LOD to encompass all site work (this was completed with the applicant's most recent submittal); f. The proposed sediment pond on the north side of the river shows grading in an area where vegetation is to be preserved and should be corrected; g. The proposed sediment pond near the wetlands does not include any grading information and should be corrected; h. The relocated hydrant near the intersection of River Walk Court and Elkhorn Avenue should be shown; i. The existing water line easement in the southeast corner of the lot shall be shown on the development plan; j. The lienholder's signature should be removed from the development plan; k. The proposed stop sign should include reference to MUTCD standards; 1. The correct crosspan widths should be shown; m. Retaining wall materials should be included in the notes section; n. Construction plans should account for root protection as outlined in Appendix D. 3. Staff recommends the southern drives be removed, per Table 4-7 and Appendix D.111.6. 4. The Town will not consider assuming public maintenance of the proposed street until a cul-de-sac has been fully developed. 5. An amended plat will be required to be recorded prior to issuance of any permits. This amended plat will need to account for sewer easement, postal cluster box easement, relocated water line easement, and right-of-way dedication. 6. The development plan is not consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Development Code. 7. Staff recommends approval of the requested waiver to Appendix D.11.E2 "Number of Vehicle Trips Per Day" because reducing the number of access points on West Elkhorn Avenue advances the goals and purposes of the EVDC (minimize drives) and would result in superior engineering (fewer drives on an arterial street). 8. Construction plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to issuance of any permits. 9. The applicant should review the Staff report and development code for all requirements, such as construction barrier fencing, timing of utility installation, as-built drawings, etc. 10. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 11. The Planning Commission is the Decision-Making Body for the development plan. Per Section 3.2.F, appeals to the Planning Commission decision may be made to the Town Board. Due to noncompliance with Limits of Disturbance and Grading standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code, Staff recommends disapproval of Development Plan 06- 08 "River View Pines." Discussion followed among Commissioners and planning staff, and is summarized as follows. The EVDC defines significant trees by their diameter at breast height. Significant conifers are eight inches or greater; significant deciduous trees are four inches or greater. Concerns regarding disturbance to riparian habitats relate to proposed installation of sewer mains along the river corridor. Concerns regarding visual impact and the view from the L f AFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 5 January 16, 2007 highway corridor relate to the number of trees proposed to be removed. The Fall River corridor is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as an area with uniquely desirable visual characteristics and an important area to resident and visitor experiences because it is a corridor to the national park. There are a variety of policies in the Comprehensive Plan to protect the natural appearance of this corridor, including providing for development that consists of small, residential cabins "tucked in" among native vegetation along the stream corridor. There may be a few significant trees on the site that should be removed due to lightning or insect damage. Public Comment: Carl Towner, representing Real Estate Investment Cet 1, LLC, provided a visual presentation to the Planning Commission. He requested assistance from the recording secretary in setting up his laptop computer; minutes reflecting that portion of the meeting are taken from the audio recording of the meeting. Mr. Towner noted the EVDC recommends removal of trees that pose a threat to public safety. He stated the EVDC does not require provision of parking for parties. If proposed units on the south side of the river were "bottom-loaded" (to meet staff's recommendation of removal of the southern driveways), congestion would be compounded. Providing "tucked in" units along the Fall River corridor is not a requirement of the EVDC. The proposed development is on the west end of Elkhorn Avenue, not on the main road to the national park. The existing units on the site are modular homes from 1997 and do not have garages. Proposed removal of trees would allow the new units to have garages. Trees add value to the property and he will take care to protect root zones of trees. Mr. Towner stated he had contacted all adjoining property owners but one. He read a letter of support signed by neighboring property owners Jon and Paula Bryson, stated he has the support of Deer Crest Resort, and quoted from a letter of support signed by neighboring property owner Michelle LeCIerc. He rebutted issues raised in a letter received by planning staff from neighboring property owners D. Scott and Patty Eldridge, and stated that a portion of the Four Seasons Inn (owned by the Eldridges) encroaches onto his property. He stated only 2,000 square feet of the 4.35-acre property is untouched by previous development. He addressed issues raised in current and previous staff reports, stating unit design has changed to save as many trees as possible, impervious coverage is less than the maximum allowed by the EVDC, building heights comply with standards, other approved developments have more extensive grading for benching than that requested in this proposal and the proposal does not violate EVDC Section 7.2, and based on Mr. Speedlin's report on significant trees, 39 trees would be "declassified" as significant trees and only nine significant trees would be removed. Mr. Towner stated all significant issues raised by planning staff have been addressed and requested approval of the proposed development plan. Discussion followed among the Commissioners, planning staff, and Mr. Towner, summarized as follows. Trees. Staff requested several months ago that the applicant provide a report on significant trees to aid with design and evaluation of the site. Mr. Speedlin's report was prepared on January 11, 2007 and could not have influenced site planning. The Estes Valley Development Code specifically defines significant trees. Many of the significant trees recommended for removal by Mr. Speedlin are listed because of their proximity to existing buildings; however, the applicant intends to remove all existing buildings from the site. Damage to root zones of trees designated to be saved may result in loss of those trees. Access. Access to units 8-12, 13-16, and 21-23 may be blocked, particularly access to adjoining units' garages, if a vehicle is parked outside the garage of any of these units. Commissioners expressed general concern about access for owners, guests, and/or emergency vehicles. Wildlife. Extensive grading proposed by the applicant may negatively impact wildlife. Other. Chair Pohl expressed concern that the applicant, over the last ten months, received repeated suggestions by planning staff and warnings from staff that the proposal would be recommended for disapproval, yet did not address staffs' concerns. Mr. Towner argued that other developments approved by the Planning Commission have greater levels of site disturbance than his proposal. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 6 January 16, 2007 Mike Todd of Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying was present to represent the applicant. In regard to staff's opinion that the development is not designed to meet the Comprehensive Plan requirement to "fit the land," he stated the project was designed to fit the existing terraces on the site. He stated the plan will not impact the visual corridor along Fall River. He stated that between the right-of-way and setbacks, there is a small area left to work in and the applicant is attempting to save a significant number of trees. The grading plan does show grading close to trees and a retaining wall to allow top-loading of some units. He noted Planner Shirk had amended a statement in the staff report relating to the slope for the cul-de-sac-the slope will be changed from 12% to 9% and will create a better cul-de-sac. Although the proposed guest parking could be improved, it meets the requirements of the EVDC. Condominium declarations could require residents to park inside garages. The southern driveways that staff recommends be removed should be retained so congestion is not increased and access can be provided off the cul-de-sac. Mr. Todd expressed concern about a condition of approval for the amended plat (which was approved but not acted upon and has since lapsed), stating the water line easement can not be vacated until the line is relocated, and the line can not be relocated until the development plan is approved. He listed benefits to the community provided by this proposed development, including the bike path, improved access to adjoining lots, and installation of new sewer and water mains. He noted existing development on the applicant's property has already impacted the site. He stated the issues have come down to the proposed limits of disturbance and proposed removal of trees-these have been issues from the beginning. There are a total of 219 trees on the site; removal of 80 is proposed. At the River's Edge development, 83 out of 288 trees were removed from the site. He referred to Mr. Speedlin's report and to contact with Tony Simons, Larimer County's wildfire hazard expert, who approximated ten to fifteen trees should be removed due to fire hazard. He stated they would attempt to save trees that could be saved. Discussion followed among the Commissioners, planning staff, and Mr. Todd. Commissioners Klink and Hull expressed concern about the location of guest parking. In response to questions from Commissioner Kitchen, Mr. Todd provided proposed heights of various retaining walls; none exceed six feet. Director Joseph quoted from EVDC Section 7.5.D.2, which states that existing trees shall be incorporated into the landscape to the maximum extent feasible and states root zones of existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. He questioned Mr. Todd whether an analysis of the proposed plans had been done to ensure these requirements were met. Mr. Todd answered, "No." Chair Pohl called a recess at 4:07 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 4:16 p.m. Adjoining property owners D. Scott and Patty Eldridge, owners of the Four Seasons Inn at 1130 West Elkhorn Avenue, stated they are not opposed to the development plan but listed a variety of concerns, including the proposed location of units 19 and 20, impact on the views for their guests and for their personal residence, loss of grazing area for elk, increased dust and noise with no mitigation plan, loss of trees and view corridor along Fall River, potential loss of income, and increased density. They stated their willingness to work together with the applicant. Adjoining property owners Jon and Paula Bryson, 1152 West Elkhorn Avenue, stated their support of the proposed development and noted their concerns about trees near the bridge creating a sight-visibility hazard for traffic and pedestrians. They stated the proposed retaining walls are necessary to meet the objective of providing a safer access road and that new landscaping on the property would be welcomed. Mr. Towner expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission. Chair Pohl noted that the decision-making body for this application is the Planning Commission; the decision of the Commission may be appealed to the Town Board of Trustees. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 7 January 16, 2007 It was moved and seconded (Hull/Pohl) to disapprove Development Plan 06-08, Riverview Pines Development, Lot 1, Riverview Pines Subdivision, due to the number of significant trees proposed to be removed, the lack of safe guest parking areas, and non-compliance with Limits of Disturbance and Grading standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code, as outlined in the staff report and findings, and the motion passed unanimously with two abstaining. Commissioner Kitchen stated she had voted in favor of disapproval only because of her concern about inadequate parking. 5. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT and REZONING, Stonebridge Subdivision, Metes and Bounds, 1043 Fish Creek Road, Applicant: Rock Castle Development Co. Commissioner Kitchen recused herself from participating on this item. Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. He stated this is a proposal to subdivide a 4.9-acre parcel located on the west side of Fish Creek Road into three lots. The northernmost lot, proposed Lot 1, would contain the existing Van Horn Engineering office building. The applicant proposes to rezone this lot from RM-Multi-Family Residential to O-Office at the request of planning staff, thus accurately reflecting its current and proposed future use. Lot 2 would be 1.594 acres in size and Lot 3 would be 2.741 acres; both would retain their current zoning of RM-Mu/ti-Fam#y Residentia/. Prior to the Valley-wide rezoning in 2000, the property was zoned for commercial use, which also allowed multi-family-residential development. The applicant may submit a development plan proposal for the site for Planning Commission review in March or April. Planning staff recommends that some review issues be delayed until the development plan and/or final plat submittal is received. Planner Shirk stated the most pertinent issue is the right-of-way width. The property is located inside Town limits and the Town Board of Trustees is the decision-making body for the subdivision plat. However, the property is adjacent to Fish Creek Road, which is a county road. Larimer County regulations regarding right-of-way width apply to this property. The applicant will appear before the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners on February 20, 2007 to request a waiver to the road right-of-way width standards. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage plan and has indicated an intention to augment the wetlands along Fish Creek. Review of the final drainage plan, as well as required landscaping and buffers, will occur when the development plan and/or final plat application is submitted. Wetlands expert Darcy Tiglas has identified two wetlands areas on the property. One is a fringe wetland along Fish Creek. The second is a small wetlands community on the southern portion of the site. Ms. Tiglas believes this wetland was created by a blocked culvert that was meant to drain from the east side of Fish Creek Road onto the applicant's property. If water flowed through the culvert as designed, this small area of wetlands would not exist. The applicant proposes to remove this wetland and replace it by augmenting the wetlands along Fish Creek. Wetlands setback requirements apply to this property. Because the wetland along Fish Creek is a fringe wetland, planning staff recommends the thirty-foot stream corridor setback apply rather than the fifty-foot wetlands setback. Utilities are in place to serve the property. A new sewer main will be installed by the applicant parallel to the existing main. The applicant will also install a new water main, which will run the length of the property along Fish Creek Road. There is a private water line crossing the property from west to east; this line serves properties to the north along the east side of Fish Creek Road. The applicant proposes to remove this private water line but must obtain permission from the owners of the line to do so. If this does not take place, planning staff recommends that a twenty-foot-wide easement be dedicated for the line. Recommended condition of approval #12 has been added to address this issue. LFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 8 January 16, 2007 The Larimer County Assessor's records indicate that a small portion of property on the east side of Fish Creek Road is a portion of the applicant's property. A letter has been submitted by William Van Horn, Trustee for Paul H. Van Horn Trust, owner of the property, stating the property on the east side of Fish Creek Road is not owned by the Trust and is not included in the Stonebridge development. It is the opinion of planning staff that the land is a portion of the former Fish Creek Road right-of-way and dates from the realignment of the road in the 1950s. Staff recommends that this discrepancy be addressed to the satisfaction of the Larimer County Assessor's office prior to submittal of the final plat. Planner Shirk reviewed the findings and recommendations as shown in the staff report and added a gth finding, as follows: The preliminary plat does not include the submitted grading plan. The grading plan will be reviewed with the development plan. This request was submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to neighboring property owners for consideration and comment. With the exception of the Fish Creek Road right-of-way width, no significant concerns issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Comments were received from Larimer County Engineering, Town Attorney White, Upper Thompson Sanitation District, Larimer County Assessor's office, and the Town of Estes Park Light and Power, Building Safety, and Public Works departments. Written comments in opposition to the request were received from neighboring property owners John Poulos, 1805 Powelly Lane, and William B. and Marguerite R. Paynter, 810 Fish Creek Road. Planning staff recommends approval of the request. Public Comment: Frank Theis, CMS Planning and Development, was present to represent the applicant and property owners. He stated their agreement with all recommended conditions of approval except condition #12 regarding the private water line easement. Bill Van Horn stated his family currently owns the property. He stated his concern that owners of the private water line would use staff's recommended condition #12 as a lever to restrict development of the property. No easement exists for the line and he does not want to grant an easement. He requested relief from condition #12. Following further discussion between Mr. Van Horn, planning staff, and Acting Public Works Director Bob Goehring, Mr. Van Horn agreed to condition #12, providing the easement is provisional and would revert to the property owner if the private water line is relocated or abandoned. Director Joseph stated that planning staff would need to review and approve the proposed easement language prior to Town Board action on this proposal. Mr. Van Horn agreed. Bob Trump, 830 Fish Creek Road, stated he is a member of the association that owns the private water line. He submitted written comments to the Planning Commission and agreed that many of his concerns would be more appropriately addressed when the development plan is reviewed. Jan Verschuur, 2361 S. St. Vrain Avenue, stated although he does not live on Fish Creek Road, he often uses the Fish Creek corridor, including the pedestrian trail. He stated that the Fish Creek area has uniquely desirable visual qualities and the development of twenty- four condominium units in this location will detract from the area rather than enhance it. He expressed concerns about development impact to the wetlands on the site. Chair Pohl provided clarification on the subdivision of land versus development plan proposals. He noted that approval of a subdivision does not guarantee approval of a development plan for the property. Commissioner Amos moved to extend the meeting beyond the 5:00 p.m. ending time in order to complete the review of this proposal. He noted the importance of preserving the meeting end time of 5:00 p.m. whenever possible. Commissioner Klink seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. DRAFT RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 9 January 16, 2007 It was moved and seconded (KlinWAmos) to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision request for Stonebridge Subdivision, Metes and Bounds, 1043 Fish Creek Road, and to recommend approval of the request for Rezoning from RM-Mu/ti-Fami/y Residentia/ to O-Office for proposed Lot 1, Stonebridge Subdivision, to the Town Board of Trustees, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff and with the applicant's agreement that language to meet required condition #12 regarding the private water line easement will be reviewed by the Town Attorney, and the motion passed unanimously with Commissioner Kitchen abstaining. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of the proposed right-of-way width modification from the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners. 2. The proposed open space area shall be graphically delineated on the final plat. 3. The wetlands and associated setbacks on proposed Lot 3 shall be protected from development through limits of disturbance unless the applicant submits a specific plan delineating how these wetlands will be replaced and how the riparian corridor will be enhanced. This plan shall be submitted for Staff review and approval prior to final plat application. 4. Development of these lots shall require each unit to have individually dedicated service lines for sanitary sewer. 5. All utilities (including fire hydrants) And required landscaping shall be accounted for with the final plat unless a development plan for Lots 2 and 3 is submitted for concurrent review with the final plat. 6. Compliance with memo from Town Attorney White dated December 15, 2006, with the exception of comment #4. 7. Compliance with memo from Light and Power dated December 19, 2006. 8. Compliance with memo from Upper Thompson Sanitation District dated December 22, 2006. 9. Compliance with memo from Town of Estes Park Public Works dated January 8,2007. 10. Compliance with memo from Town of Estes Park Water Department dated December 18,2006. 11.The discrepancy between the Larimer County Assessofs office and the property owner's claims of ownership for property located on the east side of Fish Creek Road shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Larimer County Assessor's office prior to final plat submittal. 12. The private water line crossing the property shall be placed in a twenty-foot easement unless abandoned prior to submittal of the final plat. Said easement shall automatically become null and void if the water line is abandoned. REZONING CONDITION: 1. Recordation of the final plat. 6. REPORTS None. There being no further business, Chair Pohl adjourned the meeting at 5:11 p.m. Edward B. Pohl, Chair Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary D-RAFT ~ Kearney Minor Subdivision Estes Park Community Development Department Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 ~ Estes Park, CO 80517 ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION 1MEETING DATE: February 20, 2007 PRELIMINARY PLAT TITLE: "Preliminary Plat of Kearney Subdivision, a Portion of Lot 12, South Saint Vrain Addition to the Town of Estes Park, County of Larimer, State of Colorado" LOCATION: The site is located at southwest corner of Fish Creek Road (CR 63) and Brook Drive and is addressed 1360 Brook Drive. The property is within the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNERS: Kearney and Sons Excavating, LLC/Same CONSULTANT/ENGINEER: Ross Stephen, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. STAFF CONTACT: Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a minor subdivision application to divide one "I-1" Restricted-Industrial- zoned lot, totaling 7.397 acres, into three lots, a 4.694-acre lot (proposed Lot 1), a 2.631-acre lot (proposed Lot 2), and 0.072-acre lot (Outlot A). No change in zoning is proposed. The applicant has submitted a development plan application to construct self-service mini-storage units on proposed Lot 2. The Estes Valley Planning Commission will review this application at a later date. , II. SITE DATA TABLES AND MAPS Number of Parcels Existing One Number of Parcels Proposed Three Parcel Number(s) 25314-11-043 Gross Land Area 7.397 acres per plat Net Land Area Not provided Zoning "1-1" Restricted Industrial Existing Land Use Based on Descriptions of the Use in the Submittal Application, staff classifies the existing uses as: (1) Construction Storage Yard, (2) Industry General, and (3) Warehousing and Storage (Bulk Storage) Proposed Land Use Same. Storage units may be built on proposed Lot 2. SERVICES Water Town of Estes Park Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation District Fire Protection Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Electric Town of Estes Park Telephone Qwest Gas Xcel Mapped Hazards/Physical Features Applicable to this Site? Wildfire Hazard No Geologic Hazard No Wetlands No - See Note Streams/Rivers Yes - Fish Creek Ridgeline Protection No Critical Wildlife Habitat Yes - Elk Ridgeline Protection Area No Note: While there are no mapped wetlands on the property, staff believes that wetlands exist on the property based on site visits. A wetlands study would be needed to confirm this. LOCATION MAPS WITH ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING 21 , / j,3/44 - "E" .\1 ~-110.,9 91. - Brook Dr. aRM" ~ CH" 2 0 .#' "RE" A 4- --1Â» 1 Page #2 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat %10) 14 e4 1 , 9- Single-F~mily < SF r/' UPI j / MF \ Undev- -: r,% ~ eloped --c# Single- f Storage/ Farcal f 42 Warehouse (SF) Undeveloped 4, 1 x---1 1 AERIAL PHOTO - 0 - a.r 4.14.:43:-d~ al- 1 -- ..ver.1/. iti , 4 / ?4#fy>qi"P.. 4 â‚¬4*> 6 ~:71. f k 0 )54 'f *A..9 / 614: , -41~f :> 14 2 4 ,/ / Â£ 4 1. , I 1 -AL / e.x. 4.- li4 , 5 -2, 1 4 9 '. 4 . I F rÂ® ~8 #. 'Â·~bnwi'$ -. ./ - d.~ , 1-r , 2- ~A : + V 9 - ./ I '1 S *41:* 0 : .C"t::~~ C ,~ ' . #7. '1*1% 4 41 -'. fur, 1 .42 --61 Page #3 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat , III. REVIEW CRITERIA All subdivision applications shall demonstrate compliance with the standards and criteria set forth in Chapter 10, "Subdivision Standards," and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. For minor subdivisions, the EVPC shall also find that approval will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this Code. This application does not fall within the parameters of staff-level review, and will be reviewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission in preliminary plat form and by the Estes Park Town Board in final plat form. IV. REFERRAL COMMENTS This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. The following staff and/or adjacent property owners submitted written comments. Estes Park Public Works Department See Greg Sievers' memo to Alison Chilcott dated January 26,2007. Estes Park Water Department See Jeff Boles' memo to Bob Goehring dated January 19, 2007. Estes Park Light and Power Department See Mike Mangelsen' s memo to Bob Goehring dated January 24,2007. Town Attorney See Greg White' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated January 24,2007. Upper Thompson Sanitation District See Reed Smedley' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated January 23,2007. Larimer County Engineering Department See Traci Downs' memo to Alison Chilcott dated January 31, 2007. US Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers See Timothy Carey' s letter to Alison Chilcott dated January 23,2007. Owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road See Tom Blaue's January 28,2007 letter. Page #4 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat % C V. STAFF FINDINGS 1. Project Description/Background The Project Description/Background found in Section I of this staff report is included as a staff finding. 2. Reviewing Agency Comments This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. All comments submitted by reviewing agency staff, referred to in Section IV of this staff report, are incorporated as staff findings. 3. Adjacent Property Owners Staff received written comments from one adjacent property owner, the owner of 1750 Fish Creek Road. This property is directly across Fish Creek Road from the proposed Kearney Minor Subdivision. Staff received these comments on February 5, 2007 and did not have time to research the comments prior to the due date for this staff report. However, staff will research these comments prior to the Planning Commission meeting. 4. Minor Subdivisions This is a minor subdivision application. A required finding is that approval of this application will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of.this Code. Staff needs additional information prior to making this finding. 5. Lot Size, Dimensional Standards, and Configuration The lot area/size, width, depth, shape, and orientation are appropriate for the location of the subdivision and type of development and use contemplated, with the exception that sight distance/visibility and driveway slope should be reviewed for proposed Lot 1. Sidewalk construction is required with the subdivision plat, along with clearly defining the access points to the lots. The existing wide accesses need to be narrowed to meet code. During this process the safest location for access needs to be reviewed and approved. The current proposed access to Lot 1 does not meet sight-distance requirements. 6. Slope Protection and Ridgeline Protection Standards A steep slope separates the two proposed lots. The only development proposed on this slope with the plat is installation of drainage facilities. Detailed grading should be provided for the proposed drainage facilities for review. The site is not in a ridgeline protection area and is not subject to ridgeline protection standards. Page #5 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat 7. Grading, Site Disturbance Standards, Limits of Disturbance Proposed grading should be provided for the sidewalk. Top and bottom of wall elevations for should be provided for retaining walls if walls are needed, along with retaining wall details. As noted above, grading for the detention facilities is also needed. Review of this grading will include, but is not limited to, impact on the slope, impact to existing trees, and visual and aesthetic impacts. EVDC Â§7.5.D provides guidelines for establishing limits of disturbance, e.g., avoidance of visual impacts; avoidance of steep slopes; protection of forests, significant trees, and rock outcroppings; wildfire prevention; mitigation of geologic hazards; riparian habitat buffering; floodplain setbacks; and protection of significant wildlife habitat areas. Rather than conduct a wetlands study now and placing the wetlands in a platted limits of disturbance, the Community Development Director is supportive of placing a note on the plat stating that a wetlands study will be required prior to development. The current note which states, "wetlands are evident..." should be removed and replaced with a note to this effect. The limits of disturbance shown on the plat delineate the areas that are currently disturbed and areas that will be disturbed during construction. They are not intended to be platted limits of disturbance. In some areas the limits of disturbance shown on the plat encroach into the wetlands/wetlands setback because current development encroaches into these areas. Existing contours shall be provided for Brook Drive. Contours appear to be missing near the intersection with Brook Court. 8. Tree and Vegetation Protection No tree/vegetation removal is planned at this time. Grading for the filtration pond on Lot 2 should be reviewed to determine its impact, if any, on the adj acent trees. 9. Landscaping and Buffers Landscaping is not required with this subdivision. 10. Wetlands and Stream Corridor Protection Fish Creek runs through this property and there are wetlands adjacent to the stream. A filtration pond is proposed on Lot 1 which would encroach into the thirty-foot stream setback. Per EVDC Section 7.6.F, this use is not permitted within the setback and should be relocated. It should also be relocated outside the fifteen-foot setback from the Brook Drive property line. Also based on the development plan submittal, which shows a different filtration pond on Lot 2 and a different drainage swale, it appears that grading Page #6 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat for this swale is proposed in wetlands/wetlands setback and thirty-foot stream setback. The plat should be revised so as not to grade in these areas. The proposed drainage facilities should be shown accurately on the subdivision plat and the plat and drainage report should be consistent with each other. Existing encroachments in to the wetlands can remain provided they are legal, nonconforming encroachments. 11. Geologic and Wildfire Hazards There are no mapped geologic or wildfire hazards on this property. 12. Wildlife Habitat Protection The property is in mapped elk habitat. The plan was sent to the State Division of Wildlife for comments. No comments were received. 13. Exterior Lighting No lighting is proposed at this time. 14. Adequate Public Facilities Adequate public facility requirements include compliance with current water, fire protection, sewer, electric, transportation, and drainage standards. All adequate public facilities must be installed or guaranteed prior to recordation of the plat. An engineer' s cost estimate for the cost of required improvements should be submitted prior to Town Board review of the plat, i.e., by the Revisions Due for Town Board date on the applicable Application and Review Schedule. Water - Domestic Water Pressure Both lots can be served by Town water. A water main runs along the southern property line of both lots. This main should be shown correctly. Currently two mains are shown; however, there is only one main. The Water Department has submitted comments. These comments include, but are not limited to, the requirement that each lot have a separate water-service line. The shed on proposed Lot 2 must be disconnected from the existing service line that will remain for Lot 1. The service disconnection should be included in the engineer's cost estimate. Service-line sizing for any required service lines on Lot 2 will be reviewed when development is proposed on this lot. Water - Fire Protection ISO calculations have been routed to the Fire Chief for review. These calculations show that no additional hydrants are required. Per Ross Stephen, the Fire Chief has verbally stated that proposed Lot 2 must have an access easement across Lots 1 and 2, Davis Subdivision in order for the hydrant on Lot 2, Davis Subdivision to be credited in the ISO calculations and in order for proposed Lot 1 to meet ISO requirements. There is an access easement across Page #7 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat these lots; however, it is only for the use of Lots 1 and 2 of the Davis Subdivision. The applicant should discuss this with the Fire Chief prior to resubmittal. If the Fire Chief requires revised ISO calculations these should be submitted with the revised application. Also, if the calculations show that additional hydrant(s) are needed, the hydrants should be shown on the plat and preliminary construction plans should be submitted. Sanitary Sewer System Lot 1 is currently served by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District (UTSD). Service is not provided to Lot 2 and the UTSD has commented that a sewer main extension is required to provide service to this lot. The proposed main extension should be shown on the preliminary plat. Preliminary construction plans should be submitted for the main extension. The main extension should be included in the cost estimate. Stormwater Drainage The applicant should submit a subdivision plat and drainage report that are consistent with each other for review. The report should include the proposed detention on Lot 1, Davis Subdivision and the proposed detention facility should be shown on the plat. Off-site drainage should be carefully reviewed given the drainage problems adjacent to this property. The drainage comments in Greg Sievers' memo should be addressed and the flow/volume of water in the curb studied. The width of the utility and drainage easement on the south side of Lot 1 should be clarified. The plat shows a thirty-foot-wide easement. The development plan, which was submitted later, shows a twenty-five-foot-wide easement. The correct easement width should be shown on both the plat and the development plan. As noted above detailed grading should be provided for the drainage facilities for review. The plat should demonstrate how water will reach the filtration pond on Lot 1. A shared maintenance agreement should be submitted for the drainage facilities. For example, the agreement should identify which lot is responsible for maintaining the drainage swale located in a utility and drainage easement near Lot l's southern property line. Transportation The applicant has submitted a traffic impact analysis. This study was routed to the Town Public Works Department and the Larimer County Engineering Department since the property is adjacent to both Town and County roads. This study is required to comply with EVDC Â§7.12.H Transportation. This section states in part that, "all developments shall be required to demonstrate that there will be no significant impact on existing transportation levels of service, access, and vehicular movement on any arterial or collector street or intersection within Page #8 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat ' 1 C one-quarter mile of the site or that any such adverse impact has been mitigated to the maximum extent feasible." The study does not demonstrate compliance with this general standard. It incorrectly quotes the section mentioned above, implying that only a review of impact on levels of service is required. The EVDC should be quoted correctly. The study should meet the minimum submittal requirements in EVDC Â§7.12.H Transportation and should demonstrate compliance with this section of the Code. This includes, but is not limited to factoring in trips from projects approved and/or constructed since the average daily trips referenced in the study were counted in 2005. The traffic impact analysis submittal requirements in the Larimer County Road Standards Manual also need to be met and the study should demonstrate compliance with the standards in this manual. The study should address the comments in the Traci Down's memo dated January 31, 2007. The study should provide the average daily trips for the prior use on the Kearney property since the study assumes the new use will generate fewer trips. The study states that Lot 1 will be used as a construction storage yard and bases average daily trips on this use. How do the average daily trips for this use compare with average daily trips for the excavating business use that was mentioned in the drainage report? The proposed uses in the two reports should be consistent with each other and should accurately describe the actual use of the property. The study should be signed. The County has requested right-of-way dedication and the applicant is agreeable to this. The County has also requested that the Town annex a section of Fish Creek Road right-of-way, which includes the right-of-way in front on this property. Staff needs to review these requests and will provide more information at the Planning Commission meeting. A retaining wall encroaches into the Brook Drive right-of-way, just to the east of the garage, and should be relocated onto the property. The new location should be shown on the plan. The cost of relocation should be included in the engineer' s cost estimate. Electricity All new electric service is required to be underground. Lots 1 and 2 currently share overhead service. The need for easements for the shared electric service and separate metering is being reviewed by the Light and Power Department and staff will provide more information at the Planning Commission meeting. Compliance with the comments in Mike Mangelsen's memo to Bob Goehring dated January 24, 2007 should be required. The Light and Power Department has not recommended revisions to the plat to comply with these comments. Page #9 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat 15. Gas The Statement of Intent notes that the property is served by Xcel gas; however, existing gas lines are not shown on the plat. Gas lines should be included on the plat for review. If gas lines cross the proposed lot line, dedication of easements and/or relocation will be required. Since gas is not a required adequate public facility, provision of gas to the proposed lots is not required with the subdivision plat. 16. Underground Utilities All new utilities are required to be buried underground. 17. Utility Easements Generally, ten-foot-wide utility easements are required along all property lines. Staff is supportive of the proposed utility easement dedication. Easements are dedicated along all lines except the Fish Creek Road (CR 63) lot line. Utility providers have not requested easement dedication along this property line. Some, if not all, of this area may be wetlands, wetlands setbacks, and/or stream setbacks. As such it is not an ideal location for utilities. Also, the area may be dedicated as right-of-way. 18. Streets and Driveways The Statement of Intent includes a requested waiver to parking lot paving. Staff is supportive of this waiver, provided recycled asphalt is used instead. This should be regularly maintained and should be maintained to ensure that drainage reaches the filtration pond and that dust is minimized. 19. Sidewalk, Pedestrian Connections and Trails, and Private Open Areas EVDC Section 10.5.D.2. Sidewalks states "Sidewalk is required as follows...in all zoning districts, including RE-1 and RE Zoning Districts, sidewalks on both sides of a street may be required along road where the EVPC determines there will be significant pedestrian usage..." There is significant pedestrian usage of Brook Drive and Acacia Drive. This sidewalk, along with the sidewalk being constructed on the adjacent Lot 1, Davis Subdivision, will complete sidewalk construction between Fish Creek Road and Avalon Drive. Staff is supportive of the sidewalk location shown on the plat. Staff is supportive of construction of five-foot-wide sidewalk, as required in residential subdivisions, rather than the eight-foot-wide sidewalk required in non-residential subdivisions. For safety reasons, staff is not supportive of constructing sidewalk on the northern side of Brook Drive as requested by the applicant. 20. Signs No signs are proposed. Page #10 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat , 1 21. Legibility A legible plan should be submitted for review. For example, the concrete sidewalk/curb/street detail in- the lower right-hand corner of the plat has not been reviewed because it is not legible. 22. Existing Uses The existing uses should be clearly and accurately described. The drainage report states that the existing use is an excavation business. The names of, and square footages for, buildings mentioned in the drainage report and plat should be consistent with each other and accurate. In addition, the drainage report mentions a sixty-four-square-foot explosives shed that is not shown on the plat. All existing structures should be shown on the plat. 23. Easements Private easements need to be labeled as such and need to state what property benefits from the easement, such as "fifteen-foot-wide private waterline easement for Lot 1, Kearney Subdivision." All existing easements need to described accurately with the reception number and/or book and page noted. For example, the easement shown on Lots 1 and 2, Davis Subdivision is listed as a utility easement. It is actually a utility and access easement. The access and utility easement is for the benefit of Lots 1 and 2, Davis Subdivision; however, the utility portion of the easement can also be used by the Kearney property. 24. Dedication Statement The dedication statement should dedicate all new easements shown on the plat. Easements that are not shown on the plat should not be dedicated. For example, new private easements should be dedicated. The dedication statement mentions a pedestrian/bicycle path easement; however, this easement is not shown on the plat. Is this easement required for the small encroachment of the existing Fish Creek trail onto the property? Is an easement already in place for this encroachment that is not shown on the plat and should be? Is this the easement for the possible small encroachment of the Acacia Drive sidewalk onto proposed Lot 2? The legal description in the dedication statement should be consistent with the legal description on the plat. Staff has noted at least seven inconsistencies. The signature block in the dedication statement should accurately reflect the owners and lienholders. The owner is listed as John M. Kearney. Tax Assessor records and the application form show the owner as Kearney and Sons Excavating, LLC. The statement of intent also mentions a lienholder that is not included on the plat. Page #11 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat 25. Surveyor's Certificate The Surveyor' s Certificate should accurately describe the property being surveyed. The Certificate refers to all of Lot 12, South Saint Vrain Addition. Per the plat title, this is a plat of only a portion of Lot 12. 26. Adjacent Lots The plat should include the lot, block, and subdivision name for adjacent lots. The parcel identification numbers should be provided only if a parcel is a metes and bounds parcel, i.e., not a lot in a platted subdivision. VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends DENIAL of the application. Staff further recommends that if the applicant chooses to submit a new application, the new submittal shall satisfy the following conditions: 1. Compliance with comments in Greg Sievers' memo dated January 26,2007. All comments require revisions the application. 2. Compliance with the comments in Jeff Boles memo dated January 19, 2007. Any revisions to the application that are needed to addresses these comments are noted in other conditions. 3. Compliance with the comments in Mike Mangelsen's memo to Bob Goehring dated January 24, 2007. The Light and Power Department has not recommended revisions to the plat to comply with these comments. 4. Compliance with the comment in Greg White's letter dated January 24, 2007. This requires plat revision. 5. The applicant shall propose the safest location for the Lot 1 access for review and approval. 6. Any requested wavier to sight distance and driveway slope requirements for the Lot 1 access shall be requested and justified in the statement of intent. 7. Detailed grading shall be provided for the proposed drainage facilities for review. 8. Proposed grading shall be provided for the sidewalk. 9. If retaining walls are needed due to sidewalk construction, top and bottom of wall elevations shall be provided for retaining walls, along with retaining wall details. Page #12 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat l 10. The current wetlands note which states, "wetlands are evident..." shall be removed and replaced with a note stating that a wetlands study will be required prior to development. 11. The plat shall be revised to remove all detention facility grading that encroaches into property line setbacks, stream or wetlands setbacks, or wetlands. 12. The proposed drainage facilities shall be shown accurately on the subdivision plat. 13. The plat and drainage report shall be consistent with each other. 14. Existing contours shall be provided for Brook Drive. 15. The water main running along the southern property line shall be shown correctly. Currently two mains are shown; however, there is only one main. 16. A note shall be added to the plat stating that the shed on proposed Lot 2 must be disconnected from the existing water service line that will remain for Lot 1. 17. If the Fire Chief requires revised ISO calculations, these shall be submitted with the revised application. 18. If ISO calculations show that additional hydrant(s) are needed, the hydrants shall be shown on plat and preliminary construction plans shall be submitted. 19. Compliance with the comments in Reed Smedley's letter dated January 23, 2007 shall be required. This shall include showing the required sewer main extension on the preliminary plat and submittal of preliminary construction plans for the main extension. 20. The applicant shall submit a subdivision plat and drainage report that are consistent with each other for review. 21. The drainage report shall include the proposed detention on Lot 1, Davis Subdivision. 22. The proposed detention facility on Lot 1, Davis Subdivision shall be shown on the plat. 23. The drainage report shall review the flow/volume of water in the proposed curb. 24. The width of the utility and drainage easement on the south side of Lot 1 shall be clarified. The plat shows a thirty-foot-wide easement. The development plan, which was submitted later, shows a twenty-five-foot-wide easement. Page #13 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat C %, 25. The plat shall demonstrate how water will reach the filtration pond on Lot 1. 26. A shared maintenance agreement shall be submitted for the drainage facilities. 27. The traffic impact analysis shall correctly quote the EVDC. 28. The traffic impact analysis shall meet the minimum submittal requirements in EVDC Â§7.12.H Transportation and shall demonstrate compliance with this section of the Code. This includes, but is not limited to, factoring in trips from projects approved and/or constructed since the average daily trips referenced in the study were counted in 2005. 29. The traffic impact analysis submittal requirements in the Larimer County Road Standards Manual shall be met and the study shall demonstrate compliance with the standards in this manual. 30. The traffic impact analysis shall address the comments in the Traci Downs' memo dated January 31, 2007. 31. The traffic impact analysis shall provide the average daily trips for the prior use on the Kearney property since the study assumes the new use will generate fewer trips. 32. The traffic impact analysis states that Lot 1 will be used as a construction storage yard and bases average daily trips on this use. How do the average daily trips for this use compare with average daily trips for the excavating business use that was mentioned in the drainage report? The proposed uses in the two reports shall be consistent with each other and shall accurately describe the actual use of the property. 33. The traffic impact analysis shall be signed. 34. A retaining wall encroaches into the Brook Drive right-of-way, just to the east of the garage, and shall be relocated onto the property. The new location shall be shown on the plat. 35. Gas lines shall be included on the plat for review. If gas lines cross the proposed lot line, dedication of easements and/or relocation will be required. 36. If waiver of the Lot 1 parking-lot-paving requirement is approved, approval shall be conditioned on regular maintenance of the recycled asphalt parking lot. Maintenance shall also ensure that drainage reaches the filtration pond and that dust is minimized. 37. A legible plan shall be submitted for review. Page #14 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat C 38. The existing uses shall be clearly and accurately described. The drainage report states that the existing use is an excavation business. The names of, and square footages for, buildings mentioned in the drainage report and plat shall be consistent with each other and accurate. 39. The drainage report mentions a sixty-four-square-foot explosives shed that is not shown on the plat. All existing structures shall be shown on the plat. 40. Private easements need to be labeled as such and need to state what property benefits from the easement. 41. All existing easements need to described accurately with the reception number and/or book and page noted. 42. The dedication statement shall dedicate all new easements shown on the plat. 43. The dedication statement shall not dedicate easements that are not shown on the plat. The dedication statement mentions a pedestrian/bicycle path easement; however, this easement is not shown on the plat. Is this easement required for the small encroachment of the existing Fish Creek trail onto the property? Is an easement already in place for this encroachment that is not shown on the plat and shall be? Is this easement for the possible small encroachment of the Acacia Drive sidewalk onto proposed Lot 2? 44. The legal description in the dedication statement shall be consistent with the legal description on the plat. 45. The signature block in the dedication statement shall accurately reflect the owners and lienholders. 46. The Surveyor's Certificate shall accurately describe the property being surveyed. 47. The plat shall include the lot, block, and subdivision name for adjacent lots. The parcel identification numbers shall be provided only if a parcel is a metes and bounds parcel, i.e., not a lot in a platted subdivision. 48. An engineer's cost estimate for the cost of required improvements shall be submitted prior to Town Board review of the plat, i.e., by the Revisions Due for Town Board date on the applicable Application and Review Schedule. This engineer's cost estimate shall include items such as sidewalk construction, drainage facility construction/installation, retaining wall relocation, sewer main construction, and disconnection of the water service line. Page #15 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS APPROVAL I move to recommend approval of the application to the Town Board of Trustees with staffs' findings and conditions. CONTINUANCE I move to CONTINUE the application to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting because... (state reason for continuance - findings). Note: In most cases, the applicant must agree to this, otherwise a continuance is deemed approval. DENIAL I move to recommend DENIAL of the application to the Town Board of Trustees because. . . (state reason for denial -findings). Page #16 - Kearney Minor Subdivision Plat Town of Estes Park Public Works Engineering Room 100, Municipal Building P.O. Box 1200, Estes Park, CO 80517 970-577-3586, gsievers@estes.org Memo TO: Alison Chilcott, Planner From: Greg Sievers Date: January 26,2007 Re: Re: Kearney Minor Subdivision, portion of Lot 12, S. St. Vrain Add, 1360 Brook Drive The Public Works Department has reviewed the Minor Subdivision Application for the above referenced property and has the following comments: Engineering: 1. Show existing culvert under Acacia Drive and proposed connection to it. 2. Install Type-R inlet on this same culvert. 3. Show H/C bump ramps on sidewalk at all driveway crossings. 4. Label each of the storm water detention pond for clarity. 5. Provide cross section of detention pond. 6. Provide final drainage report. 7. Provide cross-section of detention area. 8. Show any/all existing slope, trail & pedestrian easements along Fish Creek. 9. Identify (possible) vacating that portion of property north of Acacia Drive. (Outlot A) 10.'concrete sidewalldcurb/street' detail is too small to understand. â€¢ Page 1 F Water Department - ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum A~~2NATER TO: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 1/19/2007 Re: Kearney Minor Subdivision Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition 1360 Brook Drive After review of the Minor Subdivision Plat the Water Department has the following comments: 1) Each proposed Lot will require an independent water service line for supply. 2) The existing water supply (as indicated on the plat) to the shed on proposed Lot 2 must be disconnected from the existing service line that will remain for service to proposed Lot 1.A Service Line Permit from the Building Department will be required for this abandonment. 3) Applicant must schedule a Water Fixture/Dwelling Unit Count with a representative of the Water Department prior to the service line abandonment to ensure any applicable water tap credit(sh Contact the department at 970-577-3622 for scheduling. Any demolition done prior to the fixture count will result in forfeiture of any applicable water tap credits. r C C Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 01-24-07 Re: Kearney Minor Subdivision, por of Lot 12, S. St. Vrain Add, 1360 Brook Drive The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Minor Subdivision Application for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 2.) Developer to install all trenches & conduits, all materials, truck hours and mileage will be purchased from & installed by Town of Estes Park. 3.) No building permits will be approved by Light & Power until the entire Electric infrastructure has been paid for and installed. 4.) Each and every meter socket will need to be permanently marked with the specific address and or unit number prior to hook-up by the utility. 5.) All easements pertaining to Power must remain intact. 1 < 1 1 GREGORY A. WHITE ..., Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 T-f-- ~ t. r January 24,2007 ,il.ii i JAN 2 9 2007 ALISON CHILEOTT, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Application - Kearney Minor Subdivision Dear Ms. Chilcott: I have the following comment: 1. The Dedication Statement on the Final Plat needs to dedicate the easements also for "drainage facilities". If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. yerv II'ruly ~Â®rs, / /1 2 1 /6, G GregcWA. White / V GAW/ldr /6 CC: Cornerstone Engineering, Ross Stephen Fax: 970/586-2459 01/26/2007 FRI 09:07 FAX 970 586 4544 UPPER THOMPSON SAN DIST - @001/001 Upper Thompson Sanitation Disttict POBox 568 Estes Pa:k, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 January 23,2007 Alison Chilcott Planner Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Pati[, CO 80517 Ref: Kearney Minor Subdivision Portion of Lot 12, South St. VIain Addilion 1360 Brook Ihive Dear Alison, The Distdct has two comments that we would like to make at 1his time: 1) Lot 1 has an adequate existing sewer service. In the future, if their is a change of use, it maybe necessary to upgrade the sewer. Lot 2 does not have sewer senice. The proposed does not intend sewer se:vice for Lot 1 In the future, should sewer serdce be requested, a sewer main will need to be extended to Lot 2 at a point where it will best service the Lot Z A lift station will not be permitted. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, AS'*:40* Reed W. Smedley Lines Superintendent UpperThompson Sanitation District CC: Cornerstone Engineering Ross Stephen 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Estes Patk, CO 80517 Fax 970- 586-2459 Post-it' Fax Note 7671 Dam & (210(87 &8116 , 1 TO A b veâ€¢ (191 ra# Rom frll 21.~~10.- 00'DeptIN LA 40 y.*9. 2370 - CO. Phone # Phone# 6 4%114 Fax # 5'!@p Â· 03-49 Fax # 6 Â·Â·{649 C C. LARIMER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~COUNTY Post Office Box 1190 (970) 498-570 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Allison Chilcott, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Traci Downs, Development Services Engineer --g) DATE: January 31, 2007 SUBJECT: Kearney Minor Subdivision - Town of Estes Referral Proiect Description/Background: This is a preliminary subdivision plat, to subdivide a 47.7-acre parcel into 2 lots. The site address is at 1360 Brook Drive. The access to the two lots will be off of brook Drive and Acacia Drive, respectively. The site is in the Town limits of Estes Park; however, the adjacent Fish Creek Road is still within Larimer County' s jurisdiction. Lot 1 is proposed as a mini-storage site. The properties drain to the east into Fish Creek, which is just west of Fish Creek Road. Comments: Since the property is within the town limits and therefore under the Towns jurisdiction, the county engineering department is providing the following comments that primarily pertain to potential impacts to Fish Creek Road. â€¢ Fish Creek Road is functionally classified as a major collector which currently requires a 100 foot right-of-way. Based on the submitted information, Fish Creek Road appears to be within a 60 foot existing right-of-way along this entire project, which means 20 feet of additional right-of- way is necessary to satisfy the 50 foot half right-of-way requirement. This minimum required right-of-way width gives sufficient space for additional auxiliary lanes plus shoulder widening and also for frequently needed improvements that can be more minor in nature such as roadside swale grading, localized grading/drainage improvements, installation of various utilities, etc. Having the adequate right-of-way up front as development occurs prevents a prolonging situation in which the County would need to negotiate with a property owner and compensate for more right-of-way at the time of a needed improvement. I have attached the typical Major Collector Road Cross Section from the Larimer County Rural Area Road Standards for reference. As shown in the typical section, a 60 feet of right-of-way is not generally adequate for a rural road cross-section with a roadside drainage system in mountainous terrain. â€¢ The traffic impact study will need to include an analysis of the existing and/or future need for auxiliary lanes on Fish Creek Road as a result of the existing background traffic and/or traffic generated by the development of these sites. COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE ' I ( â€¢ Larimer County would typically require a 50 foot building setback from the edge of the future right-of-way for a major collector. â€¢ Although no new accesses are proposed0 for Fish Creek Road, Larimer County would like to point out that per Table 10-1 of the Rural Area Road Standards, the minimum required access spacing for Major Collectors is 660 feet. â€¢ Given the complexities surrounding the setback needs, right-of-way dedication, and the future road improvement and maintenance needs of this section of road, the County would encourage the Town of Estes to annex and take over maintenance of the existing right-of-way of Fish Creek Road from the southern limits of the development north to State Highway 36 as part of the final approval of this development. We consider the annexation to be the best approach in handling this section of roadway in regards to the road and the town's future needs. Permits: 1. Any work in on Fish Creek Road will require an Access or Utility Permit from this office. Access information and permits can be obtained by contacting Marc Lyons, Access & Utility Permit Coordinator, at (970) 498-5709. 2. If one acre or more of land is disturbed with this development, the applicant is required to apply for a Stormwater Construction Permit from the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Recommendation: The Larimer County Engineering Department can not support preliminary approval of this proposal until the above comments have been addressed and our department has reviewed and approved the additional information. The applicant should be aware that our department has based the comments on the submitted information and once the additional information has been submitted, we may have additional comments. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5701 or e-mail at tdowns @larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Cornerstone Engineering, 1692 Big Thompson, Suite 200, Estes Park, CO 80517 reading file file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\Kearney Minor Subdivision\Kearney Minor Subdivision.doc .ull/y a y 2.z /0. 8 N qi'. -1 ./ b 2 ~ â‚¬.E 7 co ~~'2 * .C 8eE 082 1 9 01 1 1 1 CD -C 'CO Â·1 b 1 i MAJOR COLLECTOR . ~ LARIMER COUNTY STANDARD REVISION NO: DRAWING RURAL AREA DRAWING DATE: 08/16/06 2 ROAD STANDARDS ABMeApa **JeAOO 'Ul!/\1,1. ill n~d tobe ~~~perth~ 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY Drarlage 12-18 Â· Shoulders shall be 6' wide seuel BABAL e'5!AA,8 L 0 (Seuel E-g) AleA Seue] #0 Jequ,InN â€¢ ( Alison Chilcott Om: Traci Downs [tdowns@ larimer.org] nt: Tuesday, February 06,2007 2:30 PM 1 0: Alison Chilcott; Dave Shirk; Russell Legg CC: Rusty McDaniel; Dale Miller Subject: fish creek road fish creek road Hi Allison, Dave and Russ - I am thinking that it might be appropriate to have daves first condition for the stonebridge development (see attached) also be one of the conditions for the Kearney site since I made the same comment regarding the town annexing fish creek in both comments for both projects. It seems appropriate to be consistent here. thanks traci 1 fish creek road Page 1 of 1 Alison Chilcott From: Dave Shirk Sent: Tuesday, February 06,2007 2:04 PM To: Traci Downs; leggrn@larimer.org; dalemiller@larimer.org Subject: fish creek road Suggested conditions for fish creek road thing: 1. The applicant shall petition the Town of Estes Park Town Board of Trustees to annex the full width Fish Creek Road along this entire frontage. This petition shall be reviewed by the Town Board prior to final plat application. 2. The applicant shall build the western half of the road to an urban cross-section including road width, shoulder, and curb-gutter section. This cross section shall be subject to review and approval of Larimer County Engineering prior to final plat application. 3. Maintenance responsibilities of this road section shall be arranged to the satisfaction of the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department and Larimer County prior to final plat application. 2/6/2007 1 4 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT DENVER REGULATORY OFFICE, 9307 SOUTH WADSWORTH BOULEVARD LITTLETON, COLORADO 80128-6901 ~ E Â© 33 ij %.f 1-* -4 January 23,2007 Alison Chilcott ~1~ JAN 2 6 2007 -~ Town of Estes Park 1 PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Kearney Minor Subdivision, Portion of Lot 12, South St. Vrain Addition, 1360 Brook Drive Corps File No. NWO-2007-189-DEN Reference is made to the above-mentioned project located in the SE 14 of Section 31, T5N, R72W, Larimer County, Colorado. If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project, either temporary or permanent, in a stream bed or wetland, this office should be notified by a proponent of the project for Department of the Army permits or changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Work in stream beds or wetlands should be identified stating the name of the water body and the Quarter Section, Township, Range and County of each area of work. If there are any questions call Mr. Terry McKee of my office at 303-979-4120 and reference Corps File No. NWO-2007-189-DEN. Sincerely, Chief, DBrwer Regulatary-Office tm . 01/28/07 KEARNEY SUBDIVISION These comments are directed towards the proposed Kearney Subdivision to be considered by the Planning Commission. The subject property has a long standing history of conflicting use with the neighboring residential areas. That conflict has intensified as the density of homes in the immediate area has dramatically increased and the Kearney Businesses have expanded. Over 20 new homes have been constructed on property directly impacted by the industrial operations since ownership transition of the property from Wagner to Kearney. While under the Kearney tenure the use intensity and diversity of the subject lots has intensified dramatically. It should be the goal and responsibility of the Town of Estes Park and the Planning Commission to mitigate this Industrial- Residential conflict, not aggravate it. The Town, in part, is responsible for the current level of incompatible use and growth by the failure to enforce existing zoning regulations and ignoring obvious public safety issues. This subdivision application provides an opportunity to correct existing use and redirect growth in a way which is more compatible with the nature of the neighborhood. Please consider the following comments. 1) Zoning Conflict: The applicant's plans call for the development of new storage units on the proposed Lot 2. There is no intent indicated to reduce or remove any of the current operations on that lot. The construction of the storage units will intensify traffic and industrial operations on the undersized Acacia, Avalon and Brook Drives. This additional commercial- industrial activity will compound the abuse on the neighbor. If the proposed use does not require Industrial Zoning, then the effected property should be re-zoned to reflect that intent, preventing future regressions back to industrial operations. 2) Access: Currently Kearney operations consume over 300 feet of access frontage onto Acacia and Brook Drives. The submitted plan for Lot 2 shows an additional proposed new access to that property. The adjacent Lot 1 has historically maintained an access with 150 ft. frontage onto Brook Drive. While the applicant has recently reduced the width of that access to 60 ft. with temporary barricades, a specific access width and location needs to be stipulated that will safely regulate construction vehicles into and out of Lot 1. The entire traffic plan for the effected area requires a complete and intelligent redesign in order to amend what has become an absurd driving gauntlet... 3) Unapproved Activity: A commercial salvage/ junkyard has been operating on the subject Lots since Kearny purchased the property. The Town needs to enforce existing zoning regulations on any unapproved activity associated with the property, prior to giving approval to an expanded use. 4) Noise Pollution: Current operations on the Kearney site frequently violate the Town' s noise ordinance, especially relating to air brake use. Again, enforcement should be exercised. 5) Dust Mitigation: The large quantity and variety of construction materials stored on site together with the disturbance of heavy truck traffic frequently keep the , C surrounding neighborhoods engulfed in clouds of dirt and dust. There has never been an observed effort from the applicants to mitigate this problem 6) Attractive Nuisance: The Kearney property has been a constant attraction to "industrial recreationalists" who frequent the grounds after hours. Dirt bike riding, four wheeler races and demolition derbies are common activities. Children are often seen climbing and playing on the dirt piles. Construction equipment-often with keys- is left in the open and is accessible to any passerby. In addition, explosive are stored on the site and would be available to anyone with an interest and a willingness to expend minimal effort. In the interest of public safety and as a deterrent to unauthorized use the entire Kearney property should have a perimeter fence with locked access. 7) Toxic/Hazardous Material: The subject property should be inspected to confirm that any toxic or hazardous materials are being properly handled and stored. 8) Storm Water Drainage: The storm water/industrial waste drainage from the Kearney property constitutes a complete environmental offense. Discharged waste to Fish Creek has been intentionally maximized by the applicant through on-going efforts of grading, contour modification, ditching and material storage. What is referenced to in the Subdivision Application as "historical drainage" should not be confused with a concept of natural or acceptable. The proposed Storm water Drainage Plan does not begin to mitigate the existing problems. Current waste drainage has been manipulated to flow as a collected total into the Brook Drive street easement and follows that easement until it discharges into Fish Creek, outside the boundary of the Kearney property. Without significant reconstruction the entire waste drainage flow will by-pass the proposed retention pond and the contamination to Fish Creek will continue. Thank you for your thoughtful considerations. Tom Blaue 01/05/2007 08:29 970580--59 CORNERSTONE Et/-7 PAGE 01 Post-It' Fax Note 7671 600-7,57- *di>&7 44,23' 1 'Co./Dept E-ex24-4--1(O'-27ts I l~'One # i'*+"E'L~,!4..c Â£1~ Phone # -- CORN~TONE hompson - Suite 200 stes Park, CO 80517 lone: (970) 586-2458 - Fax: (970) 506-2459 .mmilmaL.0 - December 27,2006 Mr. Bob Joseph Community Development Director Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Letter of Intent Kearney Subdivision Preliminary Plat Resubmittal Dear Bob, Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (CES) on behalf of the owner Kearney and Sons Enterprises, LLC is pleased to resubmit amap for the Preliminaty Plat ofa Portion ofLot 12 South Saint Vrain Addition to the Town of Estes Park, County of Larimer, State of Colorado. Owners/Lien Holders The current owner is Kearney and Sons Enterprises, LLC. First National Bank of Estes Park is the lien holder of the subject properties. Proiect Descrintion The project involves subdividing the property as a whole into two Lots and one outlot . Each Lot would continue to designated Zoning of I-1 Restricted Industrial. Access The subject properties currently gain access from Brook Drive for Lot 1 and Acacia Drive for Lot 2. Each drive has no more than 3.5% slope for the first 30' and levels out at a gentle 1.5% beyond. An Impact Traffic Analysis dated ( November 21, 2006) has been prepared for the Subdivision as a whole with projections of traffic counts as the use exists now and the proposed use of a Mini-storage facility for Lot 2. The past usc ofthc property as a construction yard, concrete plant, and materials storage area a study was conducted within the past three years reflects no significant increase in traffic and an actual reduction ofcounts with the current use on Lotl. 01/05/2007 08: 29 97058T- 39 CORNERSTONE 12 PAGE 02 Utilities The following is a list of utility providers for the subject properties: Water Town of Estes Park Gas Xcel Energy Electric Town ofEstes Park Telephone Qwest Sewer Upper Thompson Sanitation Cable TV Charter Communications There currently are adequate publiÂ© facilities available to this subdivision. The upper lot has sewer, water, and electric adjacent to the site. Electric is planned to be extended to the Lot 2 via an existing utility, drainage, and access easement from the property to the west. Lot 2 would not require water or sewer as it is proposed to be developed as Mini-Storage units. The remaining Lot 1 has sewer and water presently and utility easements are shown as proposed on the plat submitted. Wetlands Fish Creek flows along the eastern boundary with wetlands immediately adjacent to the creek. No improvements are projected in this area. The eastern side ofthe concrete block wall is the extent of the wetlands to the west. The 100 year flood plain boundary is depicted on the map. A building setback of 30' from center stream will be followed in any future development. Storm Water Management Plan A drainage report has been completed for the property. Drainage will be surface flows as the site is now. A 3055 cfwater quality filtration pond is shown to be built near the northeast corner of Lot 1.The runoffwill be released at the historic rate. The upper Lot will drain to the east a proposed water quality component is shown. to the southeast that will convey waters from Lot 2 to the creek to the east. See attached Preliminary Drainage Report ( December 2006) for further information and calculations. ISO Calculations Included with this application is an ISO calculation for the existing large building on Lot 1. An existing hydrant is situated less than 300' west of the site and a hydrant is located just east ofFish Creek Road at the intersection with Brook drive. Another offsite hydrant is located within the Brookside Subdivision and a third is located west of the property along Acacia Drive. Sidewalk. Curb. & Gutter and Asphalt This plan depicts a 5' wide side with attached curb/gutter adjacent to Acacia Drive and Brook Drive along the northern boundary. CES suggests the sidewalk be directed to the north side of Brook Drive at the intersection of Brook Court and Brook Drive. The local school children would be safer on that side of street as they board the bus near Brook Drive and Fish Creek Road on that side. This location also would avoid conflict between the pedestrians and heavy equipment operating on Lot 1. It is requested that further asphalt surfacing of Lot lbe waived to avoid damages to such a surface by the movement of large machinery inherent to the operation of an excavating company and construction materials rage or distribution. Many of the large earth moving machines are the steel track type and would cause lages to a asphalt surface. The current surface is recycled asphalt and it provides an excellent working surface for the present use. 01/05/2007 08: 29 970586~-39 CORNERSTONE El<--- PAGE 03 I . . Phasing The Kearney's plan to proceed withthe development ofLot 2 as a Mini-storage Facility as submitted for review of a Development Plan to the Town of Estes Park . Once approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission is obtained construction of the Mini-Storage would begin ( Spring of 2007 ). No further development of Lot 1 are being considered at this time. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Cot?tone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. Ross W. Stephen Senior Planner ~ TOWN OF ESTES PARIp-4 1 FEN TE: (Fct>, 40 9 1.(7 IN 1.;R\ 1 | 4 44 L,A 97 LS i. b' 0-111 111 DEVELOPMENT APPLICAheN P N :---- ----- ... 1,0 ~11 1 1 . ~111 ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COLEil 94 10 1 bl DEC 2 7 2006 4 m Submittal Date:- KEs:.sr. in-- , 1,47 /20060 b.1 73 Â·' 1 741 Type of Application 4 El Development Plan Â¤ Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map U Special Review j ROW or Easement Vacation -U- Pt@litriliiaÂ¥19Â»-"-' Â£ Rezoning Petition El Street Name Change ~ Final Map Â® Preliminary Subdivision Plat j Time Extension El Final Subdivision Plat El Other: Please list F Minor Subdivision Plat 1&- ll-0-1 AÂ·C. ~ Amended Plat General Information Project Name Kearney Subdivision Project Description Subdivision of a portion of Lot 12, South Saint Vrain Addition Project Location SE 1/4, Section 31, T5N, R72W, 6th P.M. Legal Description See Attachment 'Exhibit A' Parcel ID # 25314-11-043 Section 31 Township 5N Range 72W Property Owner Kearney & Sons Enterprises, LLC Mailing Address 1360 Brook Dr., Estes Park, CO 80517 Telephone Nos. (970)586-2150 Applicant Mike Kearney Mailing Address 1360 Brook Dr., Estes Park, CO 80517 \ Telephone I%los. (970)586-2150 ConsultanUEngineer Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying, Inc. Contact Person Kerry Prochaska / Ross Stephen Mailing Address 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 200 Telephone Nos. 970.586.2458 Fax 970.586.2459 E-Mail rstephen@ces-ccc.com Land Use Information Total Development Area (acres) 7.70 acres Open Space Area (acres) Existing Land Use Construction yard Proposed Land Use Industrial Existing Water Service TOEP Proposed Water Service TOEP Existing Sewer Service DEPSD Â® UTSD O Septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service UTSD Excel Existing Gas Service Site Access (if not on public street) Brook Drive Town of Estes Park Wetlands on Site? Yes El No [3 Zoning I-1 Attachments Listed items may not be applicable for all applications. Please refer to the EVDC and Appendix B for complete submittal requirements. 8 Statement of Intent j Digital File m CDOT Access Permit El ISO Calculations Â® Drainage Plan U Wetlands Report 8 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan j Geologic Hazard Mitigation Report Â® 11" X 17"reduced copy of plat or plan U Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Report Â® Names & Mailing Addresses of Adjacent U Transmittal Letter Confirming Site Staking Property Owners (within 100 ft., excluding ROW) Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue 4 Estes Park, CO 80517 Tel: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet.com r C FEE SCHEDULES DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK AND THE UNICORPORATED ESTES VALLEY See the appropriate Town or County fee schedule. Developments within an identified Geologic Hazard Area shall be referred to the Colorado Geologic Survey (CGS). At the time of application submittal, the applicant shall submit the required fees for the CGS review. If a development is within an identified Wildfire Hazard Area, it shall be reviewed by the Larimer County Wildfire Safety Inspector and a check for $200 made payable to Larimer County will be required at the time of application submittal. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees-are. due at tbe.time of , ... . .. .... submittal. Submittals will not be accepted unless the fees have been paid. 7 - - b; W I , ' "79 4Â·6 li'. \IN DEC 2 7 2006 i jÂ·i:! :it! 1.1 1 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION .: hâ€ž-....al.1....1 . . ..- I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct 16-th-6-56-@r-Of mylaÂ¥6*10-dge ~- ' -4 and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknoweldge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. 1 understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate or submitted after the deadline date. I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. Signatures: r Owner Signatur<-T-bL->k -\,_ ..__ ~u* ______. _pr#Â£ 046-4,~ Date 4% 321 1 Applicant Signature Date MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION Effective July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Signatures: owner signatureCES?u- Ovt . L- Date AR,5 827 0- Applicant Signature Date 12/10/2003 i DEC:27-2005 TUE.04:25 PM TR~NSNATION TITLE FAX NO, 97~5888043 I I. =imieD h Tha; pottion of Le# 12, South saint Vialn Addition to thâ€ž Town of Este, huk, boing troro particularly d.*aribed .0 tellow. 1 A portion of th. SE 1/4 of Seacion 31, Township 5 Worch, Range 72 West. 01 the Gth P.M. desgribed as beginning *t the SW corne# of thi 52 1/4 of said Soction 31, thing. 5 89'14â€¢ East 034,77 teer. along South line of Gaid Seation 31 p the point of beginning; t:hance S 89'14' East along mald Souch line of Section 31, 333.23 feet Me point in genter of rish Crcek, said point which is 1468 feet West of BE corner of said Section 31.2 thence Northerly along Interline of wid creek to point which hes Horth 49'49' ERst 242.80 1.et from intâ€¢rsâ€¢ction of acid Figh Crook and :alÂ¢i section line; chanaâ€¢ Ens; 112 fee: mon or 11Â«a 'to approximate conter-line of Fish Creek Fload, thenoc along Gentorling Of s.id road 88 tollow#: Horth 33-56' East 296.38 foet, North 27'36' Bast 212.49 1#c co point on South r*ghtÂ·+of-way line of Brook Driver fhenc. wist aleng *414 South right-ot-way linâ€¢ 417-90 f â€¢04, thance Horth 76'30' W,*c along said right-of-way linâ€¢ 107Â·09 feet, South 79'18' west alcng gaid South right-ot-way line and .long south ling ct Lot 12. Twin View Addition, 179.80 feet to point; thonce south 15'34'30â€¢ West 66.27 fiet. South 24' 41' Wamt 596.40 feat to the point of beginning. ed alsg a portionÂ· of the SW 1/4 of the 52 1/4 of Section 31, :'50, R72W of the 6,4 P. M.. Larimer councy. Colorado. mora - pâ€¢rt:Â¢ularly dageribed aa follows: commencing nt â€¢tho South 1/4 corner of waid Seoulon 31; th*Acc $89-14' R along th* South lin, of Qald Section 31 0% distance ot 634.77 fict; t.hance W24Â·07,2 4 distane* 4 367.65 0*ct to tho TRUE' POINT OF' DEC;INNING, chAnce N24'07'8 6 82$#cance or 228.75 feol:; ther,Â©â€¢ Wli'34'30â€¢E a distance ge 65.27 feae to Che Southerly Side of Twin Vi*w Addltion 60 the Town of Eares'PArk, Colorndo; thRice S79.18'W along the Soul:horly #ide of Twin Vi*W addition a diâ€¢tangl of 79,94 fiet, thence S07'.12'W . distance 62 358.86 (*at to the 7802 POrtvt OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING TRER,trROM thot Porewn dedicat:,d aw Acacia Dvive Dy th, Plat of Mâ€¢untain Tâ€¢chnological Center Subdivision of a pert:lon of Lot 11 02 south Saint Vraln Addition, recordod September 18, 1979 in Book 1987 Â« Page 0030 0* whe LAÂ¥*mer County. Colorado. rieor,~s., county of r,.avimer, State 4 Colorado. 4 ~[R' S_Â©EgyrE,5 Â·f ' I I ).-+.-W-4&--/ .:I.*I. I. /Â£' P./D 142 B : r\1 it. 1,? DEC 2 7 2006 4 HE 3,1 - ... .at L (.. ANOONhhoohhh C\I NANNAN h h=cv h â€žWO .1- GEOGGEBUDIOLOOLOLOUDIOLOLO 10 0 * 8 E % S oo ao oo 000000000001.0000000 ON 8 633 6333<333:33333383 00000 2000 23000 N 0 0.% 0 0 00000,0 00000 LOu -0000 2 2 00 1000 0 â‚¬ â‚¬ 2 -6 22.j -2 -6 2 g. 2 22â‚¬226 â‚¬M 2 - 2 2 2 g. 2 â‚¬(O 2 co co oct k (0 (0 (0 0 co co co (G (0 ro . (0 - m (0 Z J CD L (0 O Z O- 0- 1 0. 0- 0- *3 0- 0.0- E Q. a. O. o. o. o. co O- g a. ..(00=000.5000 0 0 0 0 %%2Â£%%@% *32%33*53*3142.0231#11 LO 0 0 0 G 55; 2Â§2222 O LU LU 5 LU U-1 LU O U.1 LU U.1 m LU LLI LU 111 LU LU Z W 6 LU LLI W ILI CD I U.1111 0 LU LU LU LU 2 0 - 5 â‚¬ 1 3 82 1 v -3.2 3 M a 8; 125 O 0 0 ) 0 O 9 C A - .CO 08!Scou,Â£32P. -82 00 /4-6 82â€žA N 4- = Â£/ c) Â¤) r- cv ./ -6 3- U C -M 00 > v X LO :6;2238 0 - 0 0 0 :mo @Ii-ac)&865 Â¥ C\1 -W- 52 0 o LU CV @ i f e v 2 :m 2 â‚¬ 2 % w= 2Â£99 0-5 0- c > E-% dio O Â®â€ž co m 18 3 5 [0 > o k- 0 0 o m a 25.('0 CO N 8 8 Â£ LI Z Z :38(0 66:,5 1.0 0200000 A W .-Ocym oolu-c, p-Â£O 0 4.00000 JE H m O~Ou,-100 .Grzoogâ„¢gy@~02~092#02&1*0018208%!Aggo T- p ,- 0- 0- - 10 - p C) 0- 9- 9- 0. 91- 9- CDO. .- - 0- 0- 00 - 0- 9.- 0) â€ž r â€ž 0- 8 %%22 - 73 2 %3% (D 0 CO m >J (D C 3,45 'fLfEW e:#Bal:Mile:viuf c -3 6= 8â‚¬: 99 5 % CO 3- 0 CJ g k & g ~ 1.Ll Â£ E $ Â¢ 2 -c E -2 -i = 5 1.U 2 % i 0 3 O C O C ILi .- 03(no am*.2= *0= 2-odifP11#f@1 8~ ~~3 ~-A :066006 %5 0-0.=(51:EodofÂ°6<00-~06*e~4& Zciâ‚¬B 6 -I,Qrd Â®dE.z.1 Â®/LA.Ek ed EO*4 H @dt~Er* E 2 E E 2 2 -6 & 2, 2 N E P -2 2 2 g 5 2 N 2 2 t= 2 -0 2 g N c -Â¤ 2 2. .8 2-E m m o m : 2 -c co Â® m o -(00(0)020(020(1)Â£ 06Â£1-5 0 DE 5 -3 W O LLI MJCIOOQ ~ -~ ~~&$bÂ£$~CO < CE O H (EF -13 88 92608 0 peol Xell sluel.uuedÂ¥ 86Plbl Mied VEla ZL908 ZL908 >Ped sels ZL90 ZL908 ZLGO 'MJed sels eALICI JeA ZL90 1seuueA 'S epuil Owner 11 A dress State, Z 'ped sals MJed se}s3 JO UAA01 109 L LE# 'leal !e 41! Ul a mla ZI90 'Mied sels 11!H *eupnoo ntain Drive reek Road oraine Route ro1ok 2(ourt Robert A., & Michele M. Carvell Limited Partnership uois!Alpqns XeUJee>l n J. & George R. Barker s A. & Patricia J. Blaue helcun ID. : i Â¥ 1! 11 i L g i L\ / \ 28 $* 1, N -e dil :i" Ilialiti til!11 1 it itlli i ilh \ 4 mi lim: 1 -2-li IC 1 1 ' 1 811 1,1 8 14 4 Z b 8 Ii'* 4 w ? Ilill flinr i i 11 -1 1 1;*=*;=21 1 i x-JRL .4:Â». 0 .1.%" ; :.Nia t '21#61 1 1 1 . i'' i Iiali i It :iliti . L k : <4- .- 1- :-64 - 7-:- - A I I i .1 i M L ..4.. -.. t. â€¢. 1 . 121.cb a *M L I.- A N M 462 *420 .....~~~#4 j '-' ll v b . Â·: ti...~' *k. 1414 I I M m 111 1 O Iii . 4 k .. 11 1 8 - 1 0. 3 - \ t bi# it 0~ 9 4 ==f 4 i :111 Â·Â·:. a ' }iii: k ' ..\ P; 1 4 - -J 14 . : i fy:(. I. .: I. ' i 1 q D - , '0:*4 32 :il 1 ... 1- 0 8- :4 11 .. 1 . f . eft--- ' -=2~-- di r, 1 .4.... . i 11 1 1 --- -2=-3--2-4124 -1*I NE:Th, \ \ i! - \ i .1 1 J. i Â£:----3--4%*233>iL 44. 441:- J 4 : !41 - .4 \ o ?L--- -1 . "'T 11 1 P# 0 1 411 ,,1 ,0 M L_ a )1 6 1 ?:4 4..... :.22 0' 6-U ....:. i 1 1 4----1-// If B i ~ 4\ A.:.. -. /Â·f\/f\/1. . - ... .1 55% 1, 2 i i.1 19 .: :. I. . 1\ ' \ \ t... T \ 24Â®44 .\ '1 ',~ k u. \ 1 \ \ --- I \\ 4*0 ~ta-*14'/ ~ b 'Ty --/ \ 1 ~ / <\#2 4 4.-- 9* -7\ --ill- - - 1 \ \ \ .... 1 \1 '-44%*1 -ic tl \ \ 13 0 4 V-> - b . \ 1 \J\ - a GMka r 1 n l-44 c ..- 8.40 ' \ - Â·Â«77.-1 7 - - <77 r 1 52 ~ 3 - 111 - 1)11'k V - -- \\ ~4\ \\ 9 -29 1 0 %1 - \-0, 1111 Â£ //r=7- - 0\ \ . .N: .' 0.-Ar- - 1' 11.k 0 \- 10 . -- - - --In-- .--'..7.-...2.4 .:.:e.:.7- r --- -\ %,-- -4#1:\\\\ . F IA :<::. b i 1-- l , -232 =-- gÂ» , ID--33Â»~ L- 'c-~_j=_9]1432*i- lizj--MI:Â·.:*:.Â·.Â·Â·:.:c =*t --- i~ ttili -- ....AN-%4. 02 1 1 4 7- it -7 -k \ -% -XY. .M.42-2-3.:25. \\ 1,\P/* - - 7 N \ \0 4-ZZ- -7-2 22,10 -t~â‚¬ - =* 1 1 3%4 -- . 4- C ...16 . .41 , b % tt! I - .<4\ N / \ 1.1. 4 r @' : 3 4 0 / -ik> 61%~ F, 44 3 \.|L- 47 / i..Â§2911 , /6// ~teÂ·I)\ C \... %\\ 2\ \ 000 Ti\ - - 0. -1 =- L--- j. ~ 11.t \40% .\ 0 12*2 0 Â£ +59* 11 --42- \\\ -R 2% i iÂ¥ .\ \.!1 ..=12 - 02-i- 7 1 e \\\\\\ 1. ..... 0 G ~ ':~~ 02 i' 41# '' , \ 0 9,08, f -E - .4.4.-----90 < , ,- : 46* u \1\\ \?\t\ m. 02 41 - .. I \1 . 7X -h\\ - t !!IL 11 Nk Ii-k.: 9 1 ..4404 *433 h El 0 0 --- 1Z# S \~ -- - 2222: ---L3 + .. i n I 112102 1 11"/ ms 'il WL ':tr Blal*%53, -11/ || it!10 1* !11 1 1. ~ Â¥~2 2~ .1; ~ 11 * ..41 b / 4\ 0. il 1.(*9-*k-- p 1-0-- 1 - . 1.De 15 1!ill,1 / 1 991 - IL lili 111; 1 : 11 14 1 : 11 :10 2 1; 11 0 41 I / 2~ 1 9 A. 27 1--a~. \ la i 11 /524 1 1 5-6 L; - ) \ g Ill~Z.tr E Eitl ill: ie! it ilii M ! ii Killilifin jillii 1!11 1 3~20 1 2 815. -i : 8/*/Na up \-ligr / ck 1 d- ill, *ilitili dilliligim iii ligilitililli i",w,1, 1- 880 402Â¥218 le e MÂ¥ .* 16. 1- idi f ~ 0181 4. If. ./. z- ge:,b:"9 43' 2.00 ews gitâ€¢Wi'I!'11, g:':I, ,; 8 '*Wil':dilmililil=ligi W.8, 11*121- 1 Beal"e '31 1, 1 2 9 + e Y&5 3 30' : ilit lual"iwiwiwiliti",aimiwit Iia-tilisi,lihi litili: 1 1 :; ilit At Nx V s #77 N- 0 . :k=XX * 41;3 5 8 7 0 88 0,0.- NOISIA BAS BIN BROOK DRIVE COUNTY OF LARIME S30\:0 ~ Powell Boundary Line Adjustment Plat Estes Park Community Development Department Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue PO Box 1200 *Iuil0 Estes Park, CO 80517 --Il- ~ Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: February 20,2007 REOUEST: To adjust the internal lot line - between two lots. F.NP F~VNP A .- 4 USFS LOCATION: 651 Laurel Lane, within 'Ur. unincorporated Larimer County. \-t OWNER: Rocksey and Jacquie Powell .4 R*-1 / 10 A'b,/1/in USE NE*ioral Fark W. APPLICANT/ADDRESS: Judy Nystrom 9= (representing the owners, PO Box 1229, Estes - ~ USES Park, CO 80517) RIVNP 1 81/,cary STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk SITE DATA TABLE: Surveyor: Rick England (303-823-5461) Parcel Number: 3527404036 Development Area: 2.25 +/- Number of Lots: Two existing, two proposed Existing Land Use: Single family dwelling, undeveloped Proposed Land Use: Single-family residential Existing Zoning: "E-1" Estate Adjacent Zoning- East: "E-1" Estate North: "A-1" Accommodations West: "E-1" Estate South: "E-1" Estate Adjacent Land Uses- East: Single-family North: Accommodations West: Single-family South: Single-family Services- Water: Hondius Sewer: Septic Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request to adjust the configuration of two existing lots in the High Drive neighborhood. One lot is currently developed with a single-family dwelling, and fronts directly on Laurel Lane. The other lot is currently undeveloped, but is a legal buildable lot. The property owner desires to realign the property line so the undeveloped lot has direct frontage on Laurel Lane, thus eliminating the need for an access easement across their property. This proposal does not create any additional impact on the neighborhood. Staff has received numerous comments from neighbors regarding this proposal, the majority of which are against. Typical concerns include impact on the road system, the Hondius water system, and overall development. However, there are two existing legal lots, and as mentioned, this proposal will not allow any additional development than is allowed under the current lot configuration. REVIEW CRITERIA: This proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. Town Attorney White had standard comments regarding the dedication statement. This has been included as a suggested condition of approval. Neighbors. Please refer to attached letters from neighbors regarding this proposal. In addition to these letters, Staff had a phone conversation with the daughter of Joanne Carpenter, owner of 570 Tanager. After a short conversation explaining the request, she expressed no concerns. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. Pursuant to C.R.S.30-28-110, sub-section 4(a), "no plat for subdivided land shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners unless at the time of the approval of platting the subdivider provides the certification of the county treasurer' s office that all ad valorem taxes applicable to such subdivided land, for years prior to that year in which approval is granted, have been paid." 2. This proposal complies with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. Page #2 - Powell Boundary Line Adjustment 3. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 4. Within sixty (60) days of the Board' s approval of the amended plat, the developer shall submit the final plat for recording. If the amended plat is not submitted for recording within this sixty-day time period, the approval shall automatically lapse and be null and void. 5. This is a Planning Commission recommendation the Board of County Commissioners; Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Powell Boundary Line Adjustment CONDITIONAL TO compliance with the memo from Town Attorney White dated January 24,2007. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Boundary Line Adjustment to the Board of County Commissioners with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and authorization for the chair to sign the plat when the conditions are met and the plat is presented for signature. DENIAL: I move to recommend DISAPPROVAL of the proposed Boundary Line Adjustment to the Board of County Commissioners because... (state reason for denial - findings). Page #3 - Powell Boundary Line Adjustment GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 January 24,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: Boundary Line Adjustment - Powell Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comments: 1. The Dedication Statement needs to dedicate only public easements and not dedicate a private parking easement and streets as are there are no private parking easement or public streets shown on the Plat. 2. In the event that there are utility easements along the north/south property line bisecting the property, those easements should be shown on the Plat with a Note indicating that they are vacated by this Boundary Line Adjustment Plat. I f you have any questions, plea;~ do not hesitate to give me a call. / \ /6. L'U Gr g~y A. White GAW/ldr fj CC: Judy Nystrom Fax: 970/586-1665 Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 01-24-07 Re: Powell Boundary Line Adjustment, 651 Laurel Lane The Light and Power Department has reviewed the Boundary Line Adjustment for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) Any relocation or upgrade of existing facilities will be accomplished at the project owners request and expense. 2.) All easements pertaining to Power must remain intact. 1 Water Department ,Â·Â«pÂ·Â·~ ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum To: Bob Goehring From: Jeff Boles Date: 1/19/2007 Re: Powell Boundary Line Adjustment Metes & Bounds, located in the SE 1/4 of the SE lA of S27-T5N-R73W of the 6th P.M. 651 Laurel Lane After review of the Boundary Line Adjustment the Water Department has the following comments: 1) Water service for this area is distributed through the Hondius Water System. The Petitioners must contact the Hondius Water System regarding availability, connection requirements and impacts if any the Boundary Line Adjustment will have on the private water distribution system. 01/26/2007 FRI 09:04 FAX 970 586 4544 UPPER THOMPSON SAN DIST @001/001 Upper Thompson Sanitation District PO Box 568 Estes Paik, CO 80517 (970) 58&4544 Tuesday, Januaiy 23,2007 Dave Shitk Planner U Town of Estes Paik P.O. Box 1200 Estes PaK CO 80517 Ref: Powell Boundary line Adjustment Meta & Bounds, located in the SE 1/4 of S27-T514I-R73Wof the 6* P.M. 651 Laurel Lane Dear Dave, The Disttict has no objection to the pmposed boundary line adjustment Thank you foryourtime. Since-6 Â£ 05- -4. Reed W. Smedley Lines Supelinten(tent UpperThompson Sanitation Distlict Ca Judy NÂ» trom PO Box 1229 Estes PaIk, CO 80517 Fax: 970Â·586-1665 Email: judynystrom@ maltor.com Post-itÂ® Fax Note 7671 Dale Proral f *110 62 L To t'*R- bu,G- f I P.bho v CO. Cojoept--Ft *14 l'~ 22 UX-24' 3 Phone N Phone # 6.45-44 Fax # 596-4249 Fax # 6 -1 N.#9 LARIMER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 1190 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Matt Johnson, Development Review Services 9*07 DATE: January 22,2007 SUBJECT: Powell Boundary Line Adjustment Metes & Bounds Parcel, located in the SE 1/4 of the SE 94 of S27-T5N-R73W 651 Laurel Lane Proiect Description/Background: This is a request for a boundary line adjustment to re-situate the two north-south lots to east-west while retaining the approximate lot sizes. The access will be taken from Laurel Lane for the unimproved lot and the lot with the existing home will retain the access to Laurel Lane. Comments: 1. It appears that a new access will be needed in the future for Tract 2. Although this office does not require access permits for local subdivision roads that are not maintained by the County, this office recommends that the applicant contact Marc Lyons, Larimer County's Access Coordinator, at 498- 5709 to obtain the proper access information. In this case, a new access would be subject to the County's Rural Area Road Standards Chapter 10 requirements at the time of building permit issuance. 2. It does not appear that any existing easements will be affected by this proposal. Notification and approval from the proper utility authorities is required if any easements are being vacated, created or modified in association with the boundary line adjustment. 3. Staff assumes that any subsequent improvements on this site will not adversely impact the drainage patterns or create erosion problems in the area. Recommendation: The Larimer County Engineering Department does not have any major concerns or issues with the submittal of this proposal. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5724 or e-mail at miohnson@larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Judy Nystrom, PO Box 1229, Estes Park, CO 80517 reading file file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\Powell BLA_EVPA.doc COMMITTED TO-EXCE[LENCE 01/19/2007 11:07 9704986772 LARIMER HLTH AND ENV PAGE 01/01 A LARIMER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 1525 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80524-2004 General Health (970) 498-8700 Environmental Health (970) 498-6775 Fax (970) 4984772 To: David Shirk, Town of Estes Park From: Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Planner -)44\ Date: January 19, 200,7 Subject: Powell Boundary Line Adjustment - 651 Laurel Lane I have reviewed the proposal Aoted above and have no objections so long as the utility providers have adequate access for their needs. In this case domestic water service is to be suppliedl to the vacant lot by the Town of Estes Park, and sewer for both lots will be through the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. I can be reached at 498-6777 if there are questions prior to the hearing. oc: Judy Nystrom COMNUTTED TO EXCELLENCE . Page 1 of 1 Dear Mr Shirk: I received a notice from you concerning the boundary line adjustment for the property located at 651 Laurel Lane. It is my understanding that this property line adjustmentÂ·is intended to change the orientation of the two lots so the north lot will have access to Laurel Lane. With this access to Laurel Lane, the lot is intended to be sold and eventually developed. With the prospect of additional development on Laurel Lane, will the Planning Commission consider the effects on the infrastructure in the area?: 1) Our local water is supplied by the Hondius Water District which maintains the water lines in the area. If additional development is to take place, will the Commission consider the ability of the Estes Valley Fire Dept. to have an adequate water supply to fight a structure fire or forest fire? The closest fire hydrant is well below the Blue Line down High Drive toward Beaver Point. If a home considerably larger than the homes in the area is built on this adjusted lot, how will this effect our water pressure and sewer capacity? Will the Planning Commission consider who will be responsible for upgrading the water and sewer systems, if this additional development is found to possibly overburden the current systems? 2) Laurel Lane is not a deeded County road. There is no money that I know of to maintain this road, nor is there any money to upgrade this road to County standards as is required in the Estes Valley Development Code. If development is to take place, who will pay for the badly needed upgrades? Who owns this road and is responsible for it? Heavy construction equipment has broken our shallow water and sewer lines in the past. If utility lines are compromised during the development of this adjusted lot, who will be responsible for their repair? Two cabins have just recently been rebuilt within the last 6 months along Laurel Lane with no regard for the damage to the blacktop of Laurel Lane. 3) I would highly recommend that you to speak with Bob Joseph (your colleague) who is very familiar with a similar precedent case whereby 3 building envelopes were being sold for development on our property, which is the Wonderview Condominiums (located just north of the Powell's property). Bob is very familiar with the problems of our area, and how this impeded the deYelopment of these 3 building envelopes. Thank you and the Planning Commision for considering these important issues. Please let me know that you received this letter. Respectfully submitted, John Roadcap 4005 W. 13th Street Greeley CO 80634 970-356-3676 John Roadcap johnrdcp@earthlink.net EarthLink Revolves Around You. 1/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 Dave Shirk From: E.K. Bennett [ekbpilot@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25,2007 2:50 PM To: Dave Shirk CC: ekbpilot@hotmail.com Subject: RE: Feedback re 651 Laurel Lane boundary line adjustment TO: Dave Shirt, Planner II, Estes Park, CO/ Community Development Department DATE: Jan 25,2007 FROM: E.K. Bennett, owner 651 Chickadee Lane, Estes Park, CO RE: Boundary Line Adjustment for 651 Laurel Lane FEEDBACK AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING 651 LAUREL LANE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT I am opposed to the boundary line adjustment for several reasons. (1) The density of homes accessed via Laurel Lane is already very high for the HIGH DR. neighborhood, thanks to the condominium project of the former Anderson Cabins. The projected boundary adjustment increases the likelihood of more traffic accessing more homes from Laurel Lane.(2) Other lots in the neighborhood are NOT configured in the way proposed by this change. (3) Since the owner currently owns 2 lots, he/she can combine them into one large lot to "sell" or build one house upon. There is currently only ONE well and another well would not have to be drilled. Less drain of the resources and less density in this area should be the goal...not maximizing profits of those owners now "ready to sell"! (4) The current owner of 2 lots can arrange an easement across one lot to access the other since he/she would be the grantor of the easement. This arrangement might make Lot 2 slightly less "desirable" or "marketable" than by reconfiguration of the boundaries, but once again, MAXIMIZING PROFITS should be a lessor consideration to keeping the integrity & lower density of this neighborhood. (5) If this reconfiguration of lots is allowed, it could open Pandora's Box to other boundary line adjustments sought for a variety of reasons. When the current owners purchased 2 lots, they knew that one lot had no access to a road; nothing has changed! Hence, they should not seek a change now that they are ready to sell in order to MAXIMIZE PROFITS. Regards, E.K. Bennett 1/25/2007 Page 1 of 1 Dave Shirk From: HELindberg@aol.com Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 9:31 AM To: Dave Shirk CC: WLindberg@aol.com Subject: 651 Laurel Road Dave, We have no problem with the reorientation of the property lines, however we will mention to you that the water line to our property has for at least 40 years come down from the Hondius connection thru this Powell property. If a new home gets built on one of these lots it could easily be right on top of this water line. It is only about 2' underground so it would be impacted. Right now there is a leak in the line which we need to repair in the spring and it is right in the middle of this propertry. Please be alerted to this and tell us how to keep from having a problem in the future ................... Thanks Harlan Lindberg 1/29/2007 / CON t A December 27,2006 David Shirk Community Development Department Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: 651 Laurel Lane, Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear David: I am representing the owners of the above property in their Boundary Line Adjustment, application attached. The owners, J. Rocksey & Jacquelynn A. Powell wish to reorient their two North/South lots to East/West, while retaining approximately the lot sizes. The Powells reside in Wichita, KS and will be kept informed of any options. The access will be off of Laurel Lane for the unimproved lot, and it is my understanding that both water and sewer service is available in Laurel Lane. Please contact me with any questions via email if possible, and copy in the Powells. My address is judynystrom@,realtor. com and the Powell's is THEGOLDTENDER@aol.com. Thank you for meeting with me on this and helping us achieve approval by March 2007. Very truly yours, strom rh<z~r 2 ' sociate Firstlolorado Realty, GMAC rita :.Â·2,Â·. 2'3 ': 11, 7 rm=~ P.O. Box 1229, Estes Park, CO 80517 ; ; f#/ a -11Â·-1 4Â· ~ ' 'lle Â·Â· :Â·,C t.1- Â·-Â· 11 'W tt 2, ~ DEC 2 7 2006 1;1 l.2 .... 12/1372006 WED 15:31 FAX 316 832 9538 INTRUST-North Office Â· 12/12/2006 13:45 19705F-hlbbb 13 1 LIULUMMLIU trh.,41- 1 -1'r *Â·, 1' ' -'Â·-1 -'- Â· -Â·; ' I~'~~'-Ek-;2[puh -" c C . 1,~ 'st V.u:, 1.9.3 0 1 ESTES VALLEY 4 Â· i , 11, iIi' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIOM DEC 2 7 2006 i ~ m 6 11. 1~417/ 1 1 1 Submittal Date: Development Plan * Boundary Line Adjustment Condominium Map r Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map Rezoning Petition r- Street Name Change r Final Map Preliminary Subdivision Plat 1-- Tim e Extension r' Supplemental Map Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify Minor Subdivlsion Plat Amended Plat Project Name qu ht Project Description 1250Â¢.4Â·*-4 fiN <6 -hi/, 6-oÂ·rl Â·ro 2'l,o Project Address &41 k,ku#i, L*RE , h<61 64% tap 9,â‚¬'itr Legal Description~ SEE ~ 1--LA ef 69 - - Total Development Area (acres) 4- Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use tfus:Mic- 4.452-+Trtt Existing Water Service E Town 4-Well r Other (Specify) Ag,-p'LiAâ‚¬45 P Proposed Water Service i*Towner' 1% Well r Other (specify) Exist#,g Sanjtary Sewer Service E EPSD , UTSD r SeptIC Proposed Sanltary Sewer Service r- EPSD IK UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? 7 Yes 51' No Existing Gas Service E Xcel 19 Other r None Existing Zoning E-, pre,Ged Zoning 4 â€¢ JA,-03Â£~ Site Access Of not on public street) AUMit UÂ«.6 _ Are there wetlands on the site? F Yes i No Has site gtakin been com leted? r Yes 19- No Name of Primary Contact Person 3/r'.1-*tii;DUCE>901, de#&3/(0*44Q- Malitn Address 20. 4 1.4 2.47. da F. rl Application fee Statement of intent 3 copies (folded) of plat ar plan 1 1 M X 1 T reduced copy of plat or plan Names & mailing addresses af neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix S for additional submittal requirements. which may Include ISO calculations, drainage report traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. . Town of Estes Park 4 P.O. Bow 1200 4 170 Mac*regor Avenue + EMes Park, 00 80517 Communify Development Department Phone; (970) 577-3721 -6 Fax: (970) 586-0249 -4 www.estesnet.corn/Cornoev 1-1111 -1-11-1 1 1 ' 12/13>2006 WED 13:30 FAX 316 832 9538 INTRUST-North Offlce 12/12/2806 13:45 197058F'-65 _ 151 CULUMAUU AC/ v .i r pool -n,1, I-- C -- Primary Contact Person is r Owner 9 Applicant 1* CansultanVEngineer Record Owner(s) _2-,A,ay 475 75 Jlga.â‚¬~ Â«'44,Â·--'- 0â€¢'. ;4â€¢aÂ« Â£ Mailing Address / 3,2/ ' / o IUMb}A lig,e.AU , CA){4,4,1-*i K* - 674,Â°4 Phone 3 16 - 44/.- 42 11-2 1â‚¬- X Cell Phone _516 - - 0/3- - 2994 - aitivr *>*amet* -1-1ArA-Le-v _ K Fax - 3/6 - 8-37 -9 5 39 - Email 7,06 % â€¢Lt lEâ€¢40 61Â£(0 44 L ge-t 1 Applicant 46 &440 ~9>-1 Mailing Address - t?k,;*1-'/0211. 6~54.014Â«, **491 Phone 9,0 -AFF - 7,4,S - Cell Phone %92.-1 7/P~G - 11W246 Fax- 970 - **6 -- /64%#r Email Consultant/Engineer 40127Â¢3:;:Zlitgoz:n~-1,6.r,47 ManngRaire,2 ge. 6. Â¢,2, 4~,/ir '0190 -- Phone *-3 */08 -*92â€¢/ ~1 Cell Phone 1 Fax 3,4 - 21,9 - er/ -. Ernail d%;W*â€¢7~"9*,Â¥P,1~94<A#Â£209&4~~ *9* Ir _ S APPLICATION FEES C\J For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits C.3 LLJ t See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online ~ at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule-pdf. ~ All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due atthe time of subminal. A - ~.-k.......--2//It~.4 -I-- MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01Â·1088 became effective. This legislatlon requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Prellmlnary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners Where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development, I hereby certify that the provisions of Houme Bil! 01-1088 Section 24.65.6-103 CRS have been met, Names: *Record Owner fLE&%-pâ€¢,Am 112Â»ilet__127*41(- Applicant 26Â£Affâ‚¬MNT: -114<4-li1/ b4~21V5*364%r Signatures: a J h /-1 1 ~Record Owner -4~~~17Â£jiv#~ ~7~4474V Date ,Â»14' - - Date 112,~â‚¬ 12/13/2006 WED 15:31 FAX 316 832 9538 INTRUST-North Office ' â€¢ 16< 4 2/ ZICIOO 1.95:43 19 / Unrjoibbo 1 D & UULUMMUU<riCAL_ 1 T r MUL @ 993 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ I hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewlth $ubmitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners ot the property. f In submitting the application materials anti signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC) h 1 acknowledge that 1 have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and degision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code Is avallablâ€¢ online al www.estesnetcom/ComOâ‚¬v/DevCode.) Â» I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean ttlar the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. â€¢ I understand that this- proposal may be delayed in procesping by a month or more if the information provided Is incomplete, inaocurate. or submitted after the deadline date. h I understand that a resubrnittal fee will be charged if my application [s Incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in wrjting of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identificat}orl access to my property during the review of this application. * 1 acknowledge that I Mave received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result In roy application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I unclerstand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: g Record Owner PLEASE PRIN?t J, Rock< 4~ 2, ti)ell J feau\20 lÂ°ell Approant PLEASE PRINT: -4%* 4 - Llt #7*1Â»7 Signatures: XRecord Owner -+41*1E~~-Lia<~*- ~e ,7&//54 4 C Al U pi 11} I F v D ,. Applicant T.MP*,11'920,w*v Date 4, , . .- P (4\ ~ f t' ..>44 1-tz: m * '~ f'~' r--* 9 Â·fÂ· , 1, IL 'ii ,-7 ' i~i~ j j=-ai=.ibiL:y * *: i bnjj~ lit/,1 , i f 1 ifll i DEC 2 7 2006 ~,i ~ 4/4 111 i u (4 Revised 10( 13/i ~~~&~EEgw N * zoomMowi3 8*owE NOOBIOzoooBg=R.8 2 -25 -25 -6 qi â‚¬ E E-6400Â·EZ8-2 ~-2 28-mdpr *82 60 qf.0- â‚¬ m g g.% %12 0% m.* 2-2 180 .:ULâ‚¬gs*#SER&88 WMIGUILLI-IDLLICOLUJUICOJCOJOI (D 0 i J -0 C (D ... CO > i E v & R 3 f 3 5 g v=miwom!205(r co F * . 1% imi ORE aigia,***151'51 Ea/.35 x m N t .9 meÂ° mmrrmmcmâ„¢Ata- rTH LD g Jor-cocucuo)h@80*EAES 00 A 0 J r 1- -E e- O 2 12 k- C 0 2 k ..=O gagg 0 06 -1 2 O (D E N 0 0 CD CELOO ILL -m,â€ž 0& cE/ 19 1 1 2% 11 r. 2 15- 8 % & R -9 27 0- Llj O M Z -1 -,IE D -1< I -3 # D O ciCS 1920 W. Platte Avenue Colorado Springs, CO 80904 nnett ckadee Lane tes Park, CO 80517 Id Tom Morris Circle ghlands Ranch, CO 80129 hoades Schroeder, Trustee c/o Chuck Strieker M 63102-2728 Paul, NE 68873 Kristin O'Neil Tanager oad O 80517 Olivia Gail Williams kadee Lane Estes Par 80517 Owner Owner 11 Address City, State, Zip lueullsnfpv eun Klepurlog IleMOd Robert & Carol Wands Alfred J./Dorothy P. - Life Estates Living Trust D. & Carol L. Seirer Trustees ~e~cable Trust cy K. Johnson ford J. Leu & James Mytton Patricia Roadcap s Scanlon Aoue S.E. 1/16 COR. WONDERVIEW CONDOS SEC. 27, T5N, R73W OF THE 6TH P.M. FND. 25 ALUM. CAP, ON #6 BASIS OF BEARING: S88Â°38'44"E, 1336.35' FNDMONUMENT WHICH = POWELL BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT REBAR, LS#26974. S88Â°38'44"E, 281.86' SET PROPERTY CORNER S0F04'12Â»W, 0.55 FEET FROM 1-7 7 1 1 1 1-77 1 i / 1-TTI--1 1 1-TT} 1 /1 ..114r 1 / 1 1 7\ \r \~ / i / T 7- 1 / / r T T- / / / / T r LOCATED IN S.E. 1/4 OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 27, T5N, -- T(PICAL 10' UTIUTY EASEMENT R73W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO. FND. MONUMENT WHICH BEARS .JITEM 12, 20' WIDE EASEMENT FOR FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES S. 1/16 COR. POWELL PROPERTY (651 LAUREL LANE) , S29*02'082, 24.63 FEET FROM FND. PROPERTY CORNER ------- ---~ SEC. 27126, T5N, R73W i -- OF THE 6TH P.M. 2.298 ACRES * FND. 2.5Â» ALUM. CAP, ON #6 REBAR, LS#9485. ' 19 ~ UNINCORPORATED \ LARIMER WOODLAND 1 ' COUNTY W~ E HEIGHTS 41 2ND APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT: / 6 THE FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND 8 HEREBY APPROVED AS TO FORM AS COMPLYING EXISTING ACREAGE W 1 EXISTING ACREAGE WITH ALL CURRANT SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF LARIMER COUNTY AND OF STATE LAW PERTAINING TO PLAmNG AND MONUMENTATION. THIS APPROVAL CONSTITUTES NEITHER A WARRANTY BY 1.144 ACRES 1 1.144 ACRES * i lARIMER COUNTY CONCERNING SUCH COMPLIANCE, NORA RELEASE OR INDEMNITY OF THE S t 1 1 SUBDMDER AND HIS SURVEYOR CONCERNING ANY NONCOMPLIANCE OF THIS PLAT WITH CURRENT Ck \ SURVEY REQUIREMENTS. 6 DATE. 2~0' 40' SCALE: 1"=20' , COLORADO PLS# (SIGNATURE) DATE PREPARED: 1/11/2007 1 1 GIl,/ , LARIMER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPT. /< (OR/NIED AMUE) LEGEND: 1 O FND. #4 REBAR BASIS OF BEARING: O END. #4 REBAR W/ PLASHC CAP, LS#26974 TRACT 2 1 1 j 27, EN, R73# AND ASSUMED AS BEAR/NG, 988~38'4406 AND ALL OIHER BEAR/NGS HEREIN ACRiAGE BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH UNE OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECRON 8, FND. 3/4" PIPE 2 1.149* RELATIVE THERETO. Â© FND. 1/2" P\PE 0 9/ 4~ SET #5 REBAR W/ ALUM. CAP, LS#29415 .0 ~ FND ALIQUOT CORNER 44 / - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL: (0Â£-,r _ NEW PROPERTI LINE ~ 588Â°38'24"E, 276.42' APPROVED BY THE lARIMER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS ___DAY OF to -- -- -- -- 124 21 1 , 20_, ALL DEDICATIONS ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBUC. - Il -I- l TYPICAL 10' UnUTY EASEMENT \ THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT CONSmUTE ACCEPTANCE OF REPONSIBIUTY BY THE COUNTY FOR <4 - - - ----- ----1 ~ ~ ~ 1 CONSRUCRON. REPAIR, OR AWNENANCE OF ANY SmESS HIGHHA>S, ALLE>S, BRIDGES. RIGHTS--OF-WAY OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT. 1 1 ltv k Ul ~ 1 03 r.1 -F 1 94 CHAIR ~ CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION F 1 1% A172 FOR THE POWELL BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, \ LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO.: 1 j CLERK OF THE BOARD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT ROCKSEY J. POWELL, AKA: J. ROCKSEY POWELL AND i ES JACQUELYNNE A POWELL, BEING THE OWNERS OF A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN SECION 27, T54 R73W, 1//C/N/Tr MAP , LAR/MER COUNn; COLORADO, BEING UORE PARRCULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLONS, TO-Im:Â· 1, 8 N.T.S. V COMMENCING AT THE S.E. 1/16TH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27: THENCE ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF 1HE S.E. 1/4 OF lHE S.E. 1/4, S88'38'44'E 281.86 fEE7;Â· 1HENCE LEAIANG SMD NORIH LINE, ~ S01'59'14Â»W, 363.17 FEET, ALONG THE WEST ROW OF LAUREL LANE; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST ROW, WONDERVIEW CONDOS J Â· N88'14'28Â¤W, 270.88 FEET; THENCE N00'14'49"E, 361.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID , 8 1 LARIMER COUNTY HEALTH AUTHORITY APPROVAL: PORTION OF LAND CONTAINING 2.298 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS CAUSED THE / ~ ~ WOODLAND / BY THE LAR/UER COUNTY HEAL TH AUIHOR/77 17#S - 84 K OF , 20_. ALL SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDMDED INTO LOTS TO BE KNOWN AS THE POWELL BOUNDARY UNE / 2ND DOMESTIC WATER, AND THE PROVISION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT, SHALL BE DONE EN A MANNER /ARE LAID OUT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT, AND DO ALSO DEDICATE EASEMENT FOR THE INSTAUATION 064 CONSTRUCTION ON THIS SUBDMSION, OR ANY LOT THEREIN, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF- AMUSTMENT, AND DO ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AND CONVEY TO AND FOR PUBUC USE THE STREETS AS / WHICH WILL MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AND AND MAINTENANCE OF UTIUTIES AND FOR DRAINAGE FACIUTIES AND ARE LAID OUT AND DESIGNATED ON THIS 4 THE LARIMER COUNTY PUBUC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AND THE OFFICLR AUTHORIZED TO ENFORCE PLAT, WITNESS OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS ____DAY OF , 20_. % % 1 1 1 1 SUCH REQUIREMENTS. 41 = RYÂ· 1 % 2 1 LtRIMER COUNTY HEALTH AUTHORnY ROCKSEY J. POWELL JACQUELYNNE A POWEU (OWNER) , .0 % 3 M 00 1 AKA: J. ROCKSEY POWELL (OWNER) CN /1 STATE OF COLORADO) SS \ A COUNTY OF LARIMER) 1 H/GH DR/VE %/1 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NOTE: THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS - DAY OF , 20-, 1 \ m #1 1 Boundary lines indicated on this map ore adjustments of former boundary lines of the property depicted hereon. Such odjustments do not create additional lots or building sites TRACT 1 for any purposes. The area added to eoch lot shown hereon by such adjustment is to be WfTNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. 1 li le F considered an addition to, sholl become o part of, ond sholl be conveyed together with, ACREAGE each lot as shown. ' (Ord. 8-05 #1) NOTARY PUBUC / 1.1491* I il-fi\~ I 30.00'ROW ; MY COMMISSION EXPIRES i , t.18 . if) 11 FEB - 9 2007 1 M l FND. MONUMENT WHICH BEARS - SOUTH OF UNE 2.25 FEET - / 1 1 4. 60 17' ,. FROM SOUTH PROPERTY UNE SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE *rl.~1. 1-1 1 1-1-L 1 -J .1-06â‚¬ 1 < J 1 1-11-1 -1 1 1_1_LL .L 1 L_L .Ll _iL 1 L l j t 1 L Li_LU 1 L / ' ' &' 1 FND. MONUMENT WHICH BEARS FND. MONUMENT WHICH BEARS 71.82' Â© 48'42*2 28.95' i S82 1, RICHARD A ENGLAND, A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, 98Â£52'361 9.18 FEET FROM SOUTH OF UNE 0.33 FEET 129.76' DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS POWEU BOUNDARY UNE ADUUSTMENT PlAT TRULY AND FOUND EXCEPTED MONUMENT FROM SOUTH PROPERT( UNE N88Â°14'28"W, 270.88' NOTES: CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DATE: REVISION: UNINCORPORATED 1&,NSNATION 7111Â£ INSUR*EE CON TNEP,0001590, 12/8/2006 SUPERVISION. 0112 =-19/%01/2 1/24/0/ ENGLAND SURVEYING, INC. DID NO OTHER TITLE RESEARCH. /7.-311.16. I. LARIMER COUNTY OR LODE W EXTFUCT HS ORE; AND (2) ROW R* ANT DOCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY TIE U.S. IN US. PATENE .. 1 )''h ~ r.- 4234?k~ 1. ITâ„¢ 7 OF THE lmE COWWFIWENT REFERS TO RESERVATION Of (#11 RIGHT Of PROPRIETUR OF ANY PENETRATING VEIN . ' tiftÂ»X RECORDED 1/25/1882, BOOK 32, PAGE 388. PROJECT Tmf: 2. NEW 8 REFERS TO A WARR~TY DEED, 12/26/2006, BOOK 227, PAGE 447. POWELL BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 3. ITEM 9 REFERS TO A QUIT CLAIM DEm 10/20/2000, BOOK 420, PAGE 177. RICHARD k ENGLAND, COLORADO REGISTRATION #29415 4. ITEM 10 REFERS TO AN EASENT, IN WARR*frf DEED. 5/31/1946, BOOK 813. PAGE 429, WHICH DOES NOT AFFECT 11#S LOTT, 11-/ survew,ng NOTICE: 5. REM 11 REFERS TO 15' WIDE PUBUC SERVICE EASDIENr, 7.5' FEET OF WHICH APPEARS TO BE IN THE TrBCAL 10' DATE UnLITY EASEMENT. THE EASTERLY 7.5' APPEARS m BE IN THE RODWAY. 6/24/1975, BOOK !650, PAGE 910. CUENT: POWELL ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT 5. ITEM 12 REFERS TO A WATERLINE EASEMENT, 2/3/1983, BOOK 2205, PAGE 492. HOWEVER, DOCUMENT APPEARS TO tpeciolizing In Mountain Surveying' IN THIS SURVEY MINN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFEL IN NO EVENT MAY DESCRIBE THE 20* ROADWAY EASEMENT. SHOWN HEREON. ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS WRVEY BE CO*ENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS 6. ITEM 13 REFERS TO ANY QUESTION AS TO THE SIZE OR LOCADON OF- THE SURECT PROPERTY AND AS To THE DESIGNED BY: RAE APPROVED BY: RAE (303) 823-5461 OFFICE, ,JOB NO. SHEET SHEET P.O. Box 908 Lyons. CO 80540 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERnACATION SHOWN HEREOR FCROACHIENT OF THE StaJECT PROPE]m ON TO AGIONING PROPERm LYONS DRAWN BY: LE DATE: 1/11/2007 2006/D~/POWELLDIG CHECKED BY: F~,E SCALE: AS SHOWN 56.60 1 1 CA.l \7\-F \ \ 1 7 \7\ 77\\\\Tor\\\\T=\\\\1~. 1.-1-Li...L~U\-1.--1-1 1 L Ell NOO'13'19"E, 360.79' & 4 1 i Community Development Memo TO: Members of the Estes Valley Planning Commission From: Bob Joseph, Director of Community Development Date: January 24,2007 Re: Hwy 7 Grocery/Retail Center Concept Plan The Hwy 7 Grocery/Retail Center Concept Plan is being presented to the Estes Valley Planning Commission as an informational item. No action is required at this time. This preview allows local residents and members of the Planning Commission an early opportunity for preliminary evaluation and comment on a concept for the redevelopment of the property at the comer of Hwy 7 and Manford Ave. This 6-acre site is currently zoned Commercial Outlying (CO) and is proposed to be re-developed for a 50,000 s.f. grocery market, a fuel center, and a 5,000 s.f. "pad site" for associated commercial retail use. The lumberyard and other existing uses are expected to be re-located by the developer to a new location in Estes Park. Given the recent widening of Highway 7 and the location convenient to the large residential neighborhoods situated on the south side of Town, this property is well suited to be converted to a grocery/retail use. The Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan calls for a sustainable approach to growth, and providing for the everyday needs of residents and visitors is central to this goal. It will be necessary to accommodate a project of this sort in the near future if Estes Park is to survive as a balanced and sustainable community. No rezoning would be required. A full development plan with architectural drawings, detailed landscaping and lighting plan, and engineering details such as stormwater management and utilities will be required prior to approval. This project also anticipates an amended plat to combine lots. These require a public hearing by the Planning Commission. Following is a short list of design considerations: 1. Traffic Impact Analysis. 2. Stormwater management plan. 3. Traffic circulation and adequate vehicle stacking for the fuel center. 4. Landscaping plan, including screening buffer for residential properties. 5. Exterior lighting plan. 6. Signage plan. 7. Loading docks and refuse disposal. 1 / r h P .THE MULHERN GROUP, LTD. ARCHITECTURE â€¢ PLANNING â€¢ INTERIORS Estes Park Development Intersection of Highway 7 and Manford Avenue Pre-application Letter of Intent December 19, 2006 This proposal is for the development of approximately 6 acres located at the south East corner of the intersection of Highway 7 and Manford Avenue. The parcel is zoned CO and we intend to develop uses permitted by the zoning code. The parcel currently houses a lumberyard and other miscellaneous retail. We propose a new retail center with a 50,000 SF grocery store with a fuel pad and a 5,000 SF pad. The site has good visibility and access from Highway 7. In order to best assimilate City requirements and client needs vis-A-vis aesthetics, economics and schedules, we would like to meet with the City of Estes Park to ascertain the best means to achieve this. :'Al.. - 5.----'Â· na '037 3 1 7 M? '* 1 4,11 i ffil 4 ~ :.-.4 1 C- - . 1 . . ... . , i ; 4 4 '$ - 1 ' i r > 1 4/ ' i i; T 31; DEC 2 0 2006 '. N .JJ f - J 1730 Blake Street, Suite 435 â€¢ Denver, Colorado 80202 â€¢ TEL: (303) 297-3334 â€¢ FAX: (303) 292-2601 AN hAN h h AÂ© ANNAN A 1~ANANNA~ tO LO LO LD tO 10 10 tOlD tO ID 10 10 ID LO 0 10 LO U) ID Lf) ~ ~ U, C\too 000 O 0 hoo 00000 00)0000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 000 000000000800 00000 0 000000 000 00000000000000 00000>020000000 82â‚¬ il. 22â‚¬ 0./ -â‚¬ . co Z m g ai n- CL > 0 00 2Fc lot M 42 0 2 * â‚¬ â‚¬ - I â‚¬ g g -(1) 000 OOUJUILL LU LLI 0 m CO (0 (0 CO (0 CO 00 m H 0- O- O- 0. 0. c 0- O- a. 0- a. 0 ... 2 N w _ tz #33 8 CO = m co C JO , C C Â£ 10 10 91- 9 00 00 00 E 3 3 0 co.- E co m '2 >5 Eg~~"U-2: E Â·Fi, 7 20002~~~.f~~~d.~.~~.c~ J (00 9> ~IN N ~ ~9Ji~iJJ~8@8*2~-I~~~%28%65938~%5~~~ olfi81**6~~~-~ 00000000000 E (5 8 0 0 % m J a- i C E 2 a 06 IL C < 0 -2 0 :sg C- . 00 6 6% 0 C 0 - LIC - U, 12 2 - c .9 6 (D 0 (D C 5 _ 0 538m GIZE g 02 (S 2 1, H 11 ~):t - a) 0 giES 342= cRt= E % =130 E Ze A Ir (D Z w h 2 #@m #:S-a m Â§'229 13 o.dail 2 11. - 42 = - 20 23 :E 5, E E Fl ./ 95 22 Z /5 1/ Id iE 16 g m22 led. 32-50-%715 % &-0006 E 5.92 ILL Z [I (11=35 00 ~ QI ~ -05 -05 g22 22 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 LU LU O LU LIJ LU ILI (D EB-gR>*%'22 -30,~ 1.0 - C\1 0. O. O. Q. 10 0. CU 00 C\1 0- - Q. 1.0 - - O. - 00 - 00 0. O. 1.0 (9 - Q. O. Q. U) -J a- Cl 0 - .C .C 0 0 0 v ~ 0*m 061106 2 9 8-5 2 2 Jy :. 18 5 :5 06 ac E . m'Eal Â§:~8E~NZE@.*2985=@E8&52*192;Eem 7 < DO W Z E LLI LULU w O 25 I 00 Drcn zle~j o#2 22 2 222@~03 B Food Ma 80522-0551 eal Estate Development, Inc. 0517 Estes Park, 0517 Estes Park, 0517 0517 igh Drive Estes Park, 0517 en Haven Drive Fort Collins, CO 8052 EL*E-*000 L N ')130* MeN JOO1:1 419 L ' leen ze!0 438 op Owner Owner 11 State, Zip 1211 Woodstock Drive, LLC 1685 S. Colorado Blvd. 8022 721=n===38 Peoy eu!liequl!1 S 0269 011 'Sulniuill,0pU00 enueAv Xelu Estes Park, 'Mied seW3 enueAV eu 'Mied S81S3 Ill le#!ey 'Mied sels3 0 Wled eu!de regg an, Attorney Gregg & Colleen Coffman Estes Park, O Estes Park, 17 Mied sels3 PBOH 40ln9 Sl A eysuelAI lele5191/y 1 igan Trail Estes Park 'SJeXIN Pod EC)Z 1!Url 'JogJ 'MJed se*3 enueAv Estes Park O 'Mied sels3 40 ue! ls!.140 el!-1 08 00 'lleAEH Uele Ueweluer 0/0 elelodJooul S. St. Vrain Avenue nter of Estes Park PC Manford Avenue . Willow Street Drive -lancock Insurance t Vrain Lane, 203 ueld ;deolloo Jelueo I!mabl-AleooJE) c/o Timothy J. Bath 011 'xeidwoo u!21 R â‚¬@8 Cl- LU .2 0 -C E.6 0 LULLIOO# 0 N E 2 05 2.a2% e (D Â£ b C 2] _ a < f O m 74 1 0 0> 5 / 2 5 1~ M m E 3 2 -~ 03~ 000>I Owner Owner 11 Address City, State, Zip Box 555 Estes Park, CO 80517 inda Steele 12 S~CIN-;1 ~rt Estes Park, CO 80517 Sterling Lumber & Investment Co. The 204 Denver, CO 80221 DBA Switzer Rentals Box 3800 stes Park, CO 80517 Thomas CO 80517 3735 S. Willow Circle 80237 James L. & Leeann Wehr Revocable Trust 2509 N. Campbell, 180 ucson, AZ 85719 3435 Road 59 E ueld Jdeouoo Jeilleo Imlehl-*.leooa .. . -.... I - I - 4 4 - : . - 2 - f - - - 2 2 f h -. . -. - - a - . *,2 *FaÂ·- 4 0%2'4 2 4,- . WN 1,4 f ~1,~ '1'. / k. e r'W"#'. lidillillillillillillillillilllillimi, 4:~ , /40 a a 1 rate / 4 id . /21; 0% Â£-lit' -74 . rk It:.. alÂ¥ 7 - 8 9%. 2 4 '.46 ,â‚¬;lw/,414 . |PA 01 4 63,6 *. f.laas 3 * , 2,1 F' - D'' ii, 4 1% L 4 V i.,3, 3> 41 .T., a it# .1.91 l * 0,4 ...12.h 1'4 - 4, 4,9 4,> 0 - Eâ„¢ 1 . 0 65*3%/pp/ + s"# .90 4'8 /&'t' - 1;,5?',==a.39 <WW. U t . â‚¬71;k * 4Â·.84'9Â·04* I- 9 I. . - SITE DATA: \ SnEAREA 26,0485 SF (538 Acres; excludes R.O.W dedication) TOTAL ALLOWED AREA 025 FAR. = 65,121 SF TOTAL PROPOSED AREA 55,000 SF (WO Fuel Pad) = 021 FAR. MANFORD AVENUE COMMERCIAL GIDOC:y 50,000 SF - DOSP) OSF) (7Hcsp.) V HCSpaces) loved is 65% = 169,315 SP) SITE 4431,~ 9,4 'tbo rotsÂ· -- 1/7 16 7~- VL 15 -t 07 / \ NON=~: j k -14 1 13 i 9 \ 39 MANfaRD AED 11 12 S w />, A W r AP t(70~Â©JIâ‚¬i]%.77,3 14.6 9 1 if} il JAN -3 m 111 1.1. 1 13 it 1, DI 0 25 50 L The Mulhern G:oup, Ltd. 1,6, 1 1-6, 1 Â£11.111 .Jvwvnnuw Conceptual Site Plan December 18,2006 CO .lk v Â· * .E Â· - Â·7<Â·. . I ''Â· ' â€ž 3:20'=6=~ 1 : *' &. ..'ll' 1 y %34 -2 -2. Â£' r-: '*C.,> u:.. ... . , 1 '41 1 13/f>, .3 -all ' .1 111 .4 ~ 1 Kfi 1.-0- 02= 1 1:â€¢44 @ a , 4:Z.31~aLI r...9'k . , . 1.. ... 0 1 5............. E .F.*40 4 4/: 1 2 '1., , ...1,1:i:X:%-,f:%1 - aw 2:2 1, 1,1 ' :1 411 ' :t' 1 / 1 -1 /*t: ./T . 2/22*.I - /" :*~ / ..ROE ' --*AE . L. ';/ . 1 a .m .9%7f; %5Cf _ & 1 1. ; 1 11 . 111 42Â¢ Â· 1/ 54 V , Se' i . 01.64 , 99.4 / 3.....2..A 202' 4. .~ 9,4,;/ . 403. 39 0 - 4*4 - Sit'.4 7, \.>, ti-9, ZA:. :447.4. / 4 . 1. \. 0 4 44:,9, F . kah â‚¬ \\\ -â‚¬4.4/ /~39.1 7,61 4-2 2 4.54 - v p i - E. 44.0 1... V;. 4, :.pi.~ , \ 2 -224 1446,7 -- -4 4i - 4 747 . 4. r..'.1- 1.1?1 -/:$ 92:~Maifti i e Â£Â· Â·---t- ' f *dam"Oft#EF) 65 #: 4. â‚¬ 1, i \4-4 -2 .:70$2~ 2 / ' 2 - :.im.1 9, 5/ 4 %1 -3 4 "3//4. *. 24.Zi:, . :143,6. d/&., / *,1 .13 ~ 40 219 9 , 471' ~ 4.-1 4,#41/.1 . 1 111 , t< V.7, A " , Â· .r,z <4 .,1, 6 - , IMitÂ·: /4441 44*'I' / 6* 4/,I#/ .- . al - 903 - 2/ ...4,30 , ...t-.1. ,-L 87/,1,7... , f 4 _ 24?. D -00- -,. #246 I~~ 9// 4 %:~j,-F ,/,6-0. f . 21 0 0 ~11!k Fghz; I i:/vt :911 7. "- 0 ' I.- t. VAY VA 0 /2 4 i:, f ....~ .~ Ip, -Â·.1 .1.. 2.. . I - 1 1 ..A .7-2182117-7...1,Â·r,r . 01'4#'b'#//#1$14#,li<ka;0616602'b 4 U 111 6.. M 188Â»..,h I /7 -40,1 2 3/ U 9Â«1@.Sve#jiggnimaelim~v -i~Â·:54' 4 7 ': I 1,4. 0 -40%%/ ~Ki 2 .- '' ././.7-1 -:. ' Obblf/thoftÂ·,#4/"Sâ€ž- *-;82 6 UL .1 ' . 421#1 0, 9.. '141 .4%~ 01.67-4 . 0 1 .â€¢14 0 1 2, :16 0 1, 0 4. . I. I L .. 0 , 11 11 ./.111 DAD D .1 1 0 1- - le'l-lk 0 0 . i If.VI // 19 ; 1/11' ' ... . A YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center - ~ ~~ 70 MaeGregor Avenue Estes Park Community Development Department Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: February 20,2007 REOUEST: This master plan is being ZL FUv"p A N 1 presented by the YMCA to the Estes Valley eltr,~I F~CArÂ»nri,rv r- ~ USFS Planning Commission and Board of County -G-- - Commissioners to outline a 20-year plan. E L R]cky " -M z I LOCATION: 2515 Tunnel Road, within the unincorporated Estes Valley. APPLICANT/OWNER: YMCA of the Rockies STAFF CONTACT: Dave Shirk (dshirk@estes.org, 577-3729) SITE DATA TABLE: Design Group: EDAW (Phil Hendricks, Fort Collins office, 484-6073) Parcel Number: 3404200022 (this is the Development Area: 898 acres (+/-) main parcel, there are 22 other PIDs not listed) Number of Lots: Twenty-three Existing Land Use: Accommodations/Conference Center Proposed Land Use: Same, with development Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations for an additional 1,644 guests Adjacent Zoning- East: "RE" Rural Estate, "E-1" Estate, "A" North: "0" Open (Larimer County Accommodations zoning) West: : "O" Open (Larimer County South: "E-1" Estate, "A-1" zoning) Accommodations Adjacent Land Uses- East: Single-family residential North: Rocky Mountain National Park West: Rocky Mountain National Park South: Single-family residential Services- Water: YMCA treatment plant (licensed by Sewer: UTSD the State of Colorado) Fire Protection: Estes Park Volunteer PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request for approval of a master plan for the YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center. This master plan is intended to provide guidance for development over the next twenty years. The Estes Valley Development Code does not include specific review criteria for "master plans." Staff has conducted code analysis for applicable code sections such as density, setback, stormwater, and utilities. This review is intended to provide a "template" for review of future development plans, and approve waivers to specific code sections such as road paving, curb/gutter, and sidewalks. The YMCA is a 900-acre conference center established in 1907, providing services to approximately 250,000 visitors a year. Services include conference facilities, lodging, horse riding, hiking, arts/crafts, and day camps. The Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan set forth a goal to adopt a master plan for the YMCA center. Because of this guideline, Staff has been encouraging the YMCA to proceed with a master plan for a number of years. The YMCA master planning process began in 2005, and has been through a thorough master planning process, as outlined in the plan. Development since the adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code includes " two "family reunion buildings, replacement of several cabins, redevelopment of the Mountainside Lodge, and new water storage and treatment facilities. All of this development complied with the Estes Valley Development Code, and was allowed with the understanding the master plan process was underway. Staff feels a strong working relationship has been established with the current administration, and welcomes the adoption of this master plan to create a development template over the coming years. It is Staff's opinion the overall quality and vision of the Master Plan is excellent. The plan sets forth a vision to concentrate higher levels of development in the core area, and redevelop this core area as a pedestrian campus, including relocation of existing parking lots and drives, and development of an open space and pedestrian system. Development outside the core area includes additional cabins, staff housing, and "reunion cabins." Staff suggests that several code requirements can be waived with the understanding that some additional development standards be imposed. Page #2 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan Suggested waivers to the Estes Valley Development Code include: road and sidewalk paving, development plan review for certain buildings, and sidewalk along Tunnel Road. Suggested requirements additional to the Estes Valley Development Code include: additional parking lot landscaping, stricter exterior lighting standards. These will be outlined throughout the Staff report, MASTER PLAN REVIEW: Zoning Requirements. Density. The YMCA property includes 889 acres, with an overall average slope of 19.34%. The following density calculation applies: Number Area/unit Area Required Accommodation Unit: Reunion cabin units 101 2,534 255,934 Lodge units 547 2,534 1,386,098 Sub-total: 648 1,642,032 Single-family unit (cabins): 230 11,202 2,576,460 Totals: 878 4,218,492 Assumed net land area: 34,852,356 (gross less 10% for roads) The proposed density requires 4,218,492 square feet of land where 34,852,356 square feet are provided. This equates to approximately 12% of maximum allowed build-out. Therefore, the Master Plan build-out complies with current density requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code. The overall occupancy will increase 647 from the current 4,613 for a total occupancy of 5,260 people. The new building summary indicates one new and two replacement "reunion cabins", whereas the Land Use map indicates nine. This discrepancy should be addressed. Pedestrian Amenities and Linkage Requirements. Table 4-8 requires provision for sidewalks and pedestrian linkages. Page #3 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan Staff recommends waiving sidewalk paving requirements along Spur 66 and interior streets/roads, except where delineated on the Land Use Master Plan (page 25) and where necessary for ADA requirements. Staff suggests the existing and proposed trail system (page 24) satisfies the sidewalk requirements. If a formal easement were recorded (or right-of-way dedicated), the existing trail along Spur 66 would satisfy the linkage requirement that "provision shall be made in the design of developments for interconnections with existing or planned... trail systems." The Estes Valley Trails Plan map indicates a trail in this area. Comprehensive Plan. Chapter six of the Estes Valley Plan includes specific planning sub-areas, including "Spur 66." This sub-area plan includes special considerations, including "the YMCA Camp is a significant attraction in the area, and impacts of future development must be considered on the surrounding area. The highway frontage of the YMCA property is an important buffer/visual/environmental element." The Spur 66 planning sub-area includes the following development guideline: "The YMCA frontage should be protected as open space. The YMCA should release a master plan illustrating future development." Staff considers the proposed Master Plan to be a step towards implementation of the Estes Valley Plan. The Future Land Use section of the Spur 66 sub-area states "this area also includes the YMCA conference grounds, a unique community resource which provides a transition to Rocky Mountain National Park. The sensitive development of this area is important. The Spur 66 planning area contains lands adjacent to the major entry to Rocky Mountain National Park. The sensitive redevelopment of this area is important to promote a transition between the Park and the Valley." The proposed reunion cabins located along Tunnel Road may not comply with the guideline to maintain that area as open space. Staff recommends additional information regarding location of these buildings in relation to the road, stream corridors, and significant trees are included in the Master Plan. The Planning Commission should consider the guidelines set forth in the Estes Valley Plan, as well as Limits of Disturbance Standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (see below). If the proposed location of the buildings meets Limits of Disturbance standards set forth in Section 7.2.D, Staff suggests the comprehensive plan guideline could be met if the buildings are set back far enough from Tunnel Road. Page #4 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan. In 1996, the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan as a set of development guidelines (guidelines - not regulations or requirements). The Plan includes many guidelines regarding architecture, site design, landscaping and wildlife goals. The Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan is available in the Planning office for review. Staff has reviewed the Spur 66 plan, and finds the general concept of the reunion cabins does not violate any of the guidelines set forth in that plan. Most of these guidelines are site specific in nature. Because no specific development is being proposed at this time, these guidelines do not apply. The Spur 66 plan includes a goal to "conserve wildlife habitat" and includes a wildlife map. The area where the reunion cabins are proposed was not identified as a wildlife area. Grading and Site Disturbance. Grading and Drainage. No grading plan has been proposed at this time. Limits of Disturbance. Section 7.2.D of the Estes Valley Development Code sets forth specific standards for determining Limits of Disturbance, including: a) Avoidance of visual impacts, including but not limited to ridgeline protection areas, steep slopes and scenic views. b) Preservation of forests, significant native trees, rock outcroppings or formations, and other significant native site vegetation. c) Riparian habitat, stream corridors and wetland protection and buffering. d) Significant wildlife habitat areas. Staff recommends the Overall Master Plan found on page 23 be amended to "tighten" the Family Cabins Infill area to avoid areas of steeper slope. . . ' >it -y~-- tv: %. 46Â¥12=Ne-4. / .6. 41*' b *"*" 2 1!â€¢~1â€¢ Gâ€ž0,41 b U i~ li I.*54' i i , *./. . *.. ' .'AE *1 0 29Â·1#w' Â· . .4. . 'L 0 , 4 4. A. 9 - 61- t #,1 . 4 ...1 1 ... A/927 71 -1 Fs< .f .~/ /9 a. .'* : Â· 1 b. 9,62-56: 1*1$*cl : â€¢ P .71/ U . 4 . 1. 6, * Page #5 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan te*4,_4 An area of concern, as expressed by numerous neighbor letters and Rocky Mountain National Park, are the proposed "reunion cabins" to access from Tunnel Road. The Planning Commission should consider these factors in determining if the proposed reunion cabins comply with the Estes Valley Development Code. Staff recommends that if the cabins are located far enough from the road to be "hidden" in trees, and if there is no impact on riparian corridors or aspen stands, the proposed reunion cabins would satisfy the Limits of Disturbance Standards. More information is required in order to make this determination. Staff expects this information to be presented at the Planning Commission hearing. This area is not within a mapped hazard, wetland, floodplain, or wildlife habitat area. Landscaping and Buffers. Staff supports the landscaping concepts set forth in section 4.3 of the Master Plan, and offers the following comments: a) Site specific landscaping plans will be reviewed with future development. Parking lots will need to be landscaped in accordance with Section 7.5 of the Estes Valley Development Code. This section requires perimeter screening of parking lots, and interior landscaping requirements. b) The YMCA should use the Preferred Planting List found in Appendix C of the Estes Valley Development Code. This plant list outlines species types that are suitable for this environment, and includes height/spread characteristics, sunlight and water requirements, and overall hardiness. c) Staff recommends parking lot interiors be planted with shade trees that offer a large spread characteristic to maximize visual screening of parking lots. d) Staff recommends parking lot interiors exceed the minimum planting requirements for parking lot interiors. Wetlands and Stream Corridors. All development will be subject to stream and wetland setback requirements. This includes the proposed re-alignment of Mountainside Drive. Exterior Lighting. Future development and redevelopment will be subject to lighting standards set forth in Section 7.9, which requires exterior lighting be shielded and downcast. Staff recommends no parking lot lighting exceed fifteen feet in height and that bollard style lighting be used for pedestrian areas. These have been included as suggested conditions of approval. Page #6 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan - li ./ ----- - - - - Staff recommends the overalllighting plan mentioned on page 35 be developed within the first year of approval. Entry lighting should be addressed first, as this was a suggestion of the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan. This should be included in Master Plan sections 4.3 "Site and Exterior Building Lighting" and 4.5 "Site Entrance." Off-Street Parking and Loading. Staff supports the parking lot concept presented in the Master Plan. Specific parking lot design will be addressed with future development plans, and will be reviewed to ensure compliance with parking standards such as number of spaces, landscaping, curbing, and corner radii. Staff recommends the YMCA consider a shuttle bus system to help minimize the amount of traffic on Tunnel Road/Spur 66. Streets. The following roads that serve new lodges will need to be paved to applicable standards concurrent with development (including parking lots): Friendship Lane, Kallenberg Drive, Mesa Drive, and Mountainside Drive. All other roads should be exempt from paving requirements set forth in Section 7.12 of the Estes Valley Development Code. Staff suggests Mountainside Drive be paved to county standards up the point of the proposed new alignment. From that point on Mountainside would need to built to rural standards set forth in the Larimer County Road Manual (adequate width, crown, ditch sections, and road base; no paving or curb/gutter). The proposed Mountainside Drive realignment will require careful design consideration to ensure no negative impact on stream/wetland corridors. The YMCA should be aware this road design will need to be reviewed by Larimer County Engineering prior to construction. Approval of this master plan should not be construed as approval to build the proposed Mountainside Drive. The Traffic Impact Analysis presented with the master plan indicates the warrant for a dedicated right-turn lane off Tunnel Road into the YMCA grounds has already been met. As such, Staff recommends this turn lane be installed with any development that increases traffic into the YMCA grounds; for example, any additional conference or sleeping facilities. Signage. As noted in the Master Plan, traffic signage is lacking. Staff recommends regulatory signage such as stop signs meet MUTCD standards, and street signs be mounted at a standard height and have reflective lettering to be visible at night. Addressing. Staff recommends all buildings be addressed in accordance with the Larimer County addressing policies. Page #7 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan Adequate Public Facilities. No building permit shall be issued unless such public facilities and services are in place or the commitments described in Section 7.12.C have been made. This section requires that facilities are available to serve the proposed development when building permits are issued. Water. The YMCA provides its own water treatment, and a new treatment plant was installed in 2006. Two storage tanks have been constructed within the last 2-3 years. Additional development should require verification of adequate water rights. Sanitary Sewer. The Upper Thompson Sanitation District "has the capacity to serve the proposed additional units in this development plan. However, the collection system will need to be studied to determine if it can carry additional flows." Electric. A second source of power into the property should be achieved prior to any additional development. Fire Protection. A second point of access has been established for fire protection. Staff recommends the YMCA formalize evacuation and fire mitigation plans prior to any additional development. Stormwater Drainage/Water Quality Management. The master plan includes a well formulated stormwater management plan. Future development will require all "downstream" stormwater improvement be made. For example, only those stormwater ponds necessary to serve the specific development and those downstream to Aspen Brook will be required, and those that are not part of that watershed or are upstream and not affected by development would not be required. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Town Attorney White suggested that "due to the complexity of the submitted Master Plan with regard to future development activities on the YMCA property, it is [Mr. White' s] opinion that a written agreement be entered into with the YMCA setting forth the agreement between the parties concerning the approved Master Plan . . ." Mr. White also suggested "these issues may be addressed in the findings and conditions of approval of the Master Plan by the Board of County Commissioners." Staff recommends this option. Light and Power expressed "concerns on the Loop Feed Power Supply Project that was started some time ago and has not been finished." A condition for additional units should be completion of this project. Page #8 - YMCA of the Rookies Master Plan - -- 11-*ill--i- I - -i WI--- - Upper Thompson Sanitation District wants to ensure any sidewalks built in their sewer easements should be thick enough their trucks won't damage them, and that no landscaping be installed over their main. These are issues that will be addressed with specific development plans as they come forth. Staff recommends a map of this easement be included in the master plan. Rocky Mountain National Park noted "the YMCA has retained the services of a respected planning and design firm to help them to articulate their vision for the future of the Estes Park Center." The Park also noted "we like the plan as a whole, but... would like to address four areas that... require extra attention." These include parking lots, the Spur 66 plan, wildland fire mitigation and preparedness, and exterior lighting. Larimer County Engineering has requested: a) Any additional right-ofrway necessary to satisfy the 40-foot half right-of-way required for the portions of Tunnel Road that are adjacent to this development shall be properly dedicated. b) An exclusive southbound right turn lane shall be designed and constructed at the Tunnel Road-Kallenberg Drive intersection with the first traffic generating phase of development, such as a new cabin. Neighbors. As of February 14, 2007, Staff had received 11 letters from notified neighbors (107 notified, 10.2% response). Comments focus on concerns about development along the Spur. These letters have been forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration (some properties had multiple submitted letters). Other. a) The existing building inventory should be updated to include the two new reunion cabins. b) The site area calculations on page 11 should be finalized. c) References to Estes Park Sanitary Sewer District should be corrected to Upper Thompson Sanitation District (see page 18). d) The slope analysis map should include an average slope calculation. e) The Trails Master Plan should be amended such that the "open space" and proposed reunion cabins do not conflict. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. This is a request for a master plan outlining future development of the YMCA of The Rockies Estes Park Center, and includes waivers to several code Page #9 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan standards such as curb/gutter and paving standards, and also includes additional restrictions to code standards such as outdoor lighting. Future development will be subject to standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code. 2. With the exception of specific waivers subject to approval of the Board of County Commissioners, the development plan complies with all applicable standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code. 3. The Master Plan is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of the Estes Valley Plan. 4. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. 5. This is a recommendation by the Planning Commission to the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners (who need to approve various waivers). 6. Approval of this plan provides a three year vesting period pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S. The YMCA may request subsequent vesting period extensions with review by the Estes Valley Planning Commission and approval of the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners. 7. Because not enough information has been provided at this time, approval of this master plan does not include approval or disapproval to locate any development along the Tunnel Road frontage. Any future development in that area shall be subject to review and approval of the Estes Valley Planning Commission. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed "YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Master Plan" Development Plan CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Future development shall comply with the approved Master Plan. Future plan amendments shall be presented to the Estes Valley Planning Commission for review. Staff shall be authorized to review minor plan revisions pursuant to Section 3.7 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 2. With the exception of waivers outlined below, development shall comply with the provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code and other applicable codes. 3. The YMCA of the Rockies shall present a report to the Estes Valley planning staff on a yearly basis (YMCA shall be responsible for scheduling this meeting in January or February). This report shall include a summary of the previous year' s development activity, as well as intentions for the coming year. The purpose of this report is to ensure a high level of communication, and allow the Estes Valley Staff to inform the YMCA of development requirements such as changes to the Estes Valley Development Code and review timeframes to minimize delays in processing building permits and/or development plans. 4. Development plans shall not be required for the following development, as delineated in the Master Plan: entry features, replacement cabins, maintenance facilities, guest/family cabins, outdoor chapels, picnic/cookout shelters, restrooms/shower facilities, human resources complex, gathering spaces, or other small projects that do not individually exceed 2,000 square feet. Page #10 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan Building and/or grading permits shall be required, and shall be subject to review and approval of the Estes Valley Planning Staff and applicable Larimer County staff (such as engineering, building, and health). Staff recommends the YMCA meet with planning staff prior to beginning design to discuss requirements. Staff reserves the right to require a development plan for individual projects should it be determined a building permit application does not contain adequate information to review for compliance with applicable sections of the Estes Valley Development Code. 5. At such time that Mountainside Drive is re-aligned, it shall be design and paved to county road standards up the point of the proposed new alignment. From that point on up the hill, Mountainside Drive shall be built to rural standards set forth in the Larimer County Road Manual (adequate width, crown, ditch sections, and road base; no paving or curb/gutter). The proposed alignment of Mountainside Drive shall be subject to review and approval of Staff to ensure proper stream setbacks are maintained and engineering standards - including BMP standards for drainage, are met. 6. Curb and gutter shall not be required for roads, unless necessitated by stormwater management requirements or sidewalks. Roadside drainage swales shall meet Larimer County standards, or other as approved by the Larimer County Engineering Department. 7. Photometric studies shall be included with all parking lot proposals. No parking lot lighting shall exceed fifteen feet in height. 8. Bollard style lighting shall be used for any proposed lighting of pedestrian areas. 9. Staff recommends all existing outdoor lighting not necessary for security purposes be turned off during nonoperating hours. 10. Future cabin development and redevelopment shall be coordinated with the Trails Master Plan. 11. Paved sidewalks shall not be required along Spur 66 and interior streets and roads, except as delineated on the Land Use Master Plan (p. 25). Staff shall be authorized to approve alternative sidewalk materials such as pavers or finely crushed rock. Any alternative materials shall provide for ADA accessibility. 12. Parking lot interiors shall exceed the minimum planting requirements for parking lot interiors by twenty percent. For example, where the EVDC requires ten trees in a parking lot, twelve shall be required. 13. Additional development shall require verification of adequate water rights. 14. All new development shall require regulatory signage, such as stop signs, meet MUTCD standards. Street signs shall be mounted at a standard height and have reflective lettering to be visible at night from Tunnel Road all the way to the proposed development. 15. All new development shall be addressed in accordance with the Larimer County addressing policies. Page #11 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan 16. No increase in occupancy shall occur until evacuation and wildfire mitigation plans have been approved by the Larimer County Emergency Coordinator. The Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Chief shall be consulted with on the preparation of these plans. 17. An exclusive southbound right turn lane shall be constructed or guaranteed at the Tunnel Road-Kallenberg Drive intersection with the first traffic generating phase of development, such as a new cabin. 18. The following roads that serve new lodges shall be paved to applicable standards concurrent with development (including parking lots): Friendship Lane, Kallenberg Drive, and Mountainside Drive. All other roads shall be exempt from paving requirements set forth in Section 7.12 of the Estes Valley Development Code. 19. Any additional right-of-way necessary to satisfy the 40-foot half right-of-way required for the portions of Tunnel Road that are adjacent to this development shall be properly dedicated no later than December 31, 2007. 20. A public pedestrian access easement shall be recorded for the existing trail along Tunnel Road no later than December 31, 2007. 21. The overall lighting plan mentioned on page 35 should be developed within the first year of approval. Entry lighting should be addressed first. 22. The YMCA shall discuss partnering with the Town of Estes Park and Rocky Mountain National Park to take part in the bus shuttle system. 18. The existing building inventory should be updated to include the two new reunion cabins. 19. The site area calculations on page 11 should be finalized. 20. References to Estes Park Sanitary Sewer District should be corrected to Upper Thompson Sanitation District (see page 18). 21. The slope analysis map should include an average slope calculation. 22. The Trails Master Plan should be amended such that the "open space" and proposed reunion cabins do not conflict. 23. A map of the sanitary sewer easement shall be included in the master plan. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners APPROVAL of the proposed "YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Master Plan" with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. DENIAL: I move to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners DISAPPROVAL of the "YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Master Plan" because...(state reason for denial - findings). CONTINUANCE: 1 move to continue the "YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Master Plan" because...(state reasonfor continuance -findings). Page #12 - YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan Occupancy Comparision Currently Master Plan Guest Cabins # of Buildings 204 230 # of Guest Rooms 522 613 Maximum Occupancy 1191 1396 Reunion Cabins # of Buildings 12 16 # of Guest Rooms 69 101 Maximum Occupancy 306 434 Guest Lodges # of Buildings 11 12 * ~ # of Guest Rooms 467 547 * Maximum Occupancy 2470 2790 * Staff Cabins #of Buildings 17 8 # of Guest Rooms 48 20 Maximum Occupancy 98 40 Staff Lodges #of Buildings 15 5 # of Guest Rooms 247 224 Maximum Occupancy 513 600 Total Guest Accomodations # of Buildings 227 258 # of Guest Rooms 1058 1261 Maximum Occupancy 3967 4620 Total Staff Accomodations # of Buildings 32 13 # of Guest Rooms 295 244 Maximum Occupancy 611 640 Total All Accomodations # of Buildings 259 271 # of Guest Rooms 1353 1505 Maximum Occupancy 4578 5260 * Reflects corrected number of proposed reunion cabins to 6 total, 2 of which are replacements GREGORY A. WHITE Attorney at Law North Park Place 1423 West 29th Street 970/667-5310 Loveland, Colorado 80538 Fax 970/667-2527 January 24,2007 DAVE SHIRK, PLANNER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT TOWN OF ESTES PARK PO BOX 1200 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Re: YMCA of the Rockies - Master Plan Dear Mr. Shirk: I have the following comment: 1. Due to the complexity of the submitted Master Plan with regard to future development activities on the YMCA property, it is my opinion that a written agreement be entered into with the YMCA setting forth the agreement between the parties concerning the approved Master Plan as it relates to future development including, but not limited to, grandfathered structures, the effect of future Estes Valley Development Code revisions, review criteria for proposed structures prior to building permits, amendments to the Master Plan, and any other issues that need to be part of a written agreement. In lieu of a written agreement, these issues may be addressed in the findings and conditions of approval of the ~aster Plan by the Board of County Commissioners. I f you have any questions, plea~do~not hesitate to give me a call. ~ Gregor~A. White GAW/ldr CC: Mark Holdt, Vice PrÂ¢sident Fax: 970/586-6088 ~ t Memo To: Bob Goehring From: Mike Mangelsen Date: 01-24-07 Re: YMCA of the Rockies, (Master Plan), 2515 Tunnel Road The Light and Power Depattment has reviewed the Proposed Master Plan for the above referenced property and has the following comments: 1.) We have no comments regarding the Master Plan. We would however like totake advantage of this opportunity to express our concerns on the Loop Feed Power Supply Project that was started some time ago and has not been finished. It was mutually agreed and understood that 2 sources of power would be beneficial to the YMCA from the stand point of reliability. The Town of Estes Park has done as much as possible and now awaits the installation of the necessary under ground conduits to finish the job. This portion of the work needs to be accomplished by the YMCA. This has no real affect on the Master Plan it's simply a project that is in limbo that should be completed. 1 01/26/2007 FRI 09:17 FAX 970 5*6 4544 UPPER THOMPSON SAN DIST 0001/001 { Upper Thompson Sanitation District PO Box 568 Estes Park, CO 80517 (970) 586-4544 Thursday, January 25,2007 Dave Shirk Planner TI Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Ref: YMCA of the Rockies Parcel Identification Numbers 3404106001, 3404200022,3404300032, 3404400064, 3404200022,34050000022,34050000024,3409100001,3409100028,3409200006,3404200022, 3409100001, 3404400064, 3409100028, 3404300032, 3410000013, 3400000014, 3404306006, 34043060 Deaf Dave, The District has a 15.0 foot wide, 11,563 foot long permanent utility easement crossing portions of the above referenced propetty, the YMCA ofthe Rockies. The intent ofthe easement was te generally follow the existing roads. The proposed Master Plan suggests ,noving the existing toadway, creating a sidewalk for foor tramc. The Distzict must be able to access the existing manholes within rhe urility easement with their heavy equipment. Any sidewalks crossing the easement should be designed such that they can withstand the weight of the heavy equipment Trees, shrubs and the impounding of water ate not permitted on the utility easement The District currently has the capacity at the plant to serve thc proposed additional units in this development plan. I Iowever, the collection system will need to be studied to demaninc ifi[ can carry the additional Dowa. The Upper Thompson Sanitation District serves this propetty, not the Esres Park Sanitary Sewer Disitict. Currently a Sewer Tap costs $4,500.00 and $200.00 per tap for associated fees. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, i \ 0,)49-: Reed W. Smedley 4 Lines Superintendent Upper Thompson Sanitation District CC; Mark Holdr, Vice President YMCA of the Rookies POSt-!t~ Fax Note 7671 Dete ~ (Ji~. ~69 &86â€¢ ~ 2515 Tunnel Road Estes Park, CO 80511 To f,2,â‚¬- 8LL From (11â‚¬li-~o - FAX: 970-586-6088 MA"*-9/JA ~JAQ G UTSO Phone # Phone # 6-45-44 FaX # 52 00 -63.1.4 9 Fax# 6 -1.849 01/29/2007 14:45 9704986~- . LARIMER HLTH AKE -NV PAGE 01/01 A LARIMER DEPARTMENT QF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT f~COUNTY 1525 Glue Spruce Drive Fort Co#ins, Colorado 80524-2004 General Health (970) 498-6700 Environmental Health (970) 498-6775 Fax (970) 498-6772 To: Dave Shirl(, Town of Estes Park From: Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Planner a gâ€ž Date: January 26,2007 Subject: YMCA of the Rookies Estes Park Conference Center Master Plan Our office has been asked to comment on the recently completed Master Plan for the YMCA Estes Park Conference Center. 1 reviewed tile plan with Tom Gonzales frorh our Estes Park oftice. It is our view that the plan is very professional and presents a vision for the future that is compatible with public health protection. 1 would offer the following observations in this regard: â€¢ The Center is connected to public sewer provided by the Estes Park Sanitation District. It is unusual that a mountain facility has access to public sewer. This allows the YMCA to concentrate the uses that receive most visitors in the core area and leave a large percentage of the property in a natural slate. The Master Plan notes that upgrades are planned for the onsite sewage collection system. â€¢ The YMCA operates a public water system that includes filtration and disinfection, The treatment plant is scheduled for a major upgrade, and the distribution system is maintained and upgraded on an ongoing.basis. â€¢ The Master Plan identifies pedestrian and vehicle access improvements. Beyond the obvious safety benefits, research has shown that providing safe attractive pedestrian walkways encourages people to walk longer distances and leave the car in the parking lot The benefits are reduced air emissions and more exercise. . Stormwater improvements are identified in the plan. These include erosion control measures in conjunction with pedestrian path imprvvements. Erosion control measures are important for long term water quality protection. â€¢ The food service facilities at the Conference Center are licensed and inspected through our office. Any changes or upgrades in these facilities should be reviewed by our office prior to obtaining a building permit, â€¢ The Child Care facilities at the center are licensed by the Colorado Department of Human Services. Our office works cooperatively with Human Services to inspect and consult with licensed facilities. We area available for plan reviews prior to making physical changes at these facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I can be reached at (970) 498-6777 if there are questions about any of these comments. CC: Mark Holdl YMCA of the Rookies COMMITTED ID EXCELLENCE 1 & LARIMER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~COUNTY Post Office Box 1190 6 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-1190 (970) 498-5700 FAX (970) 498-7986 MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Shirk, Planner Town of Estes Park PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: Matt Johnson, Development Review Services,7*0 DATE: January 30,2007 SUBJECT: YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan - Estes Valley Planning Area Proiect Description/Background: YMCA of the Rockies has submitted a master plan for their community which provides an approximate 20 year outlook for this site. The master plan is conceptual in nature and serves to address how to better accommodate visiting guests as well as staff. As a result, strategies have been developed in the master plan which consider architecture, pedestrian and vehicle circulation, roads, parking, landscaping and irrigation, signage, lighting, environmental issues, stormwater management, accessibility, and open space. This site's address is 2515 Tunnel Road and is located on the west side of the State Highway 66 Spur (Tunnel Road). The YMCA entrance is at the 66 Spur and Kallenberg Drive intersection. YMCA Master Plan Comments: 1. The Larimer County Transportation Plan, adopted in November of 2006, functionally classifies Tunnel Road as a minor collector which requires an 80 foot right-of-way (40 foot half right-of-way). Therefore, this office will require the applicant to record a dded of dedication as part of this master plan application for any additional right-of-way necessary to satisfy the 40 foot half right-of-way requirement. (LCLUC Section 9.7) 2. Based on the traffic memorandum provided by Matt Delich, dated December 13,2006, an exclusive southbound right turn lane is already needed at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection. Therefore, this improvement shall be required as part of any new traffic generating phase of development including a building permit application for a new cabin, etc. 3. This office provides services to rural landowners and developers on matters of grading, erosion control, restoration/revegetation, and other environmental concerns. Feel free to contact Scott Cornell, Environmental Site and Access Specialist, at 498-5723 for information about this service. Future Development Plan Review Comments: 1. This office has the understanding that each phase of this development will be required to go through the town's Development Plan Review process for any new building larger than 2000 square feet. With each Development Plan Review submittal, this department will require more detailed information that conforms to Section 7 and Appendix D of the Estes Valley Development Code as H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan.doc COMMITTED-TO-EXCEr[ENCE C C well as the Larimer County Stormwater Design Standards (LCSDS). The applicant should be aware that adequate infrastructure and drainage conveyances necessary to serve the proposed use will need to be designed and built as part of any future Development Plan Review application. 2. Future Development Plan submittals will need to adequately address engineering issues such as: paved parking, handicap parking and accessibility, internal paved drives capable of accommodating emergency service vehicles (minimum 20 feet wide), pavement design, roadside drainage, erosion control, intersection sight distance on 66 Spur at YMCA entrance, signage, etc. Additionally, the applicant should contact the Estes Park Fire Protection District to ensure that the building and internal street layout is adequate for their purposes. 3. Depending on the number of new vehicle trips that will be generated by any future expansion, this office may require more detailed traffic information which considers if there are other needed roadway/intersection improvements in the area. 4. Detailed Drainage/Grading and Erosion Control Reports and Plans will be required for each project phase as well as for any Grading Permit application from the Town. These reports and plans shall address issues such as detailed drainage basin information, the need for any detention ponds and the sizing and release rates of such facilities, existing and proposed swale and culvert sizing, effects on downstream and offsite drainage facilities, stormwater quality measures with special consideration to the nearby streams, etc. The applicant should be aware that page 50 of the LCSDS calls for detention of the 100 year storm event as well as a maximum allowable release rate from detention basins of no more than the 2 year historic rate. A greater release rate can be allowed if it can be shown that the downstream path of flow is capable of handling greater rates. Otherwise, this department does not have any further comments with regard to the Conceptual Drainage Plan and Report that was prepared as part of this master plan proposal. Permits: 1. Any work within the Tunnel Road right-of-way will require an Access or Right-of-way Construction Permit from this office. Access information and permits can be obtained by contacting Marc Lyons, Larimer County' s Access Coordinator, at (970) 498-5709. 2. If one acre or more of land is disturbed with this development, the applicant is required to apply for a Stormwater Construction Permit from the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. Recommendation: This office requests that the following items be made conditions of approval for the Master Plan application: â€¢ Any additional right-of-way necessary to satisfy the 40 foot half right-of-way requirement for the portions of the 66 Spur (Tunnel Road) that are adjacent to this development shall be properly dedicated. â€¢ An exclusive southbound right turn lane shall be designed and constructed at the Spur 66/Kallenberg Drive intersection with the first traffic generating phase of development such as a new cabin. As long as the above comments and recommendations are noted, this department does not have any objections for this application to proceed to the public hearing stages of the planning process. Please feel free to contact me at (970) 498-5724 or e-mail at miohnson@larimer.org if you have any questions. Thank you. CC: Mark Holdt, Vice President, 2515 Tunnel Road, Estes Park, CO 80511 reading file file H:\DEVREV\PLANCHK\Referrals\CITIES\Estes\YMCA of the Rockies\YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan.doc United States Department of the Interior '4<1/1/966'94./9/AL' NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Rocky Mountain National Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 ir ,-*9 & I - 1 P r-9 4 IN REPLY REFER TO: --1...'.':==-.**I#...=JI A3815 FEB - 8 20W N* 01 %3 2, p/ -nni i i) ~ FEB -8 2007 1 M Estes Valley Planning Commission - < P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Commissioners: We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the master plan for the Estes Park Center, YMCA ofthe Rockies. We also appreciate the fact that the YMCA has retained the services of a respected planning and design firm to help them to articulate their vision for the future of the Estes Park Center. On January 16, 2007 Kent Meyer and his staff provided us with an overview ofthe plan and answered many of our questions. We like the plan as a whole, but we would like to address four areas that we believe require extra attention: Parking lots The plan includes several large parking lots. Because the main campus ofthe YMCA is situated on an open, relatively flat knoll, parking lots are highly visible from key vantage points within the national park, including overlooks on Trail Ridge Road that attract hundreds of visitors daily during the summer. Light colored vehicles and sunlight reflecting off of windshields are especially visible from long distances. Where possible, we would encourage the YMCA to provide screening and shade plantings within the parking lots. In addition, we would request that the YMCA fully explore alternatives to large parking lots, including, but not limited to, encouraging their employees and guests to carpool or use public transit. Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan The YMCA was a partner in the development of the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan, which was adopted by the Larimer County Commissioners as a guideline for future development within the corridor. The three proposed reunion cabins along Spur 66 are not consistent with the Corridor Management Plan, which identified the highway frontage of the YMCA property as an important buffer/visual/environmental element. The plan also states that the vegetation along the roadways, drainage ways, and hillsides is an important visual asset within the planning area. Wildland Fire Mitigation and Preparedness For the past several years, Rocky Mountain National Park and the YMCA have been conducting hazard fuel reduction work along our shared boundary. This work is critically important, and ( t wildland fire mitigation should be completed in the vicinity of all new structures at the YMCA prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. In the event of a wildland fire, Spur 66 provides the main escape route for YMCA employees and guests and the many residents who live in the corridor. If we are interpreting the master plan correctly, the current maximum occupancy at the YMCA is 4,578. At build-out of the master plan the occupancy would be increased to 6,257, a 37% increase. Increased occupancy above current levels should occur only after an emergency preparedness plan is in place. The plan should address, among other things, notification of area residents and guests in the event of an emergency, evacuation o f the YMCA and the Spur 66 Neighborhood, and traffic management. Exterior Lighting At this time, exterior lighting at the YMCA is highly visible from within Rocky Mountain National Park. As the YMCA moves forward with the implementation of the master plan we would request that outdated exterior lighting be replaced with new sharp cutoff fixtures that minimize light pollution. With the extensive parking lots and pedestrian walkways that are planned for the YMCA campus, we would also request that parking lot and walkway lighting be kept to the minimum necessary for public safety. We would also ask that exterior lighting not be incorporated into the two outdoor chapels that are located at the west end of the YMCA property. These elevated sites are very visible from within the national park. If the Planning Commission or the applicant have any questions about our comments, please contact Larry Gamble, the Chief of Planning and Compliance for the park. He can be reached at (970) 586-1320. Sincerely, Â« %-4 Vaughn L. Baker Superintendent cc: Estes Park Center, YMCA ofthe Rockies TO: Dave Shirk Community Development Department Estes Park, CO 80517 FROM: David Tiemeyer, PE 3245 Tunnel Road Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: YMCA of the Rockies Estes Park Center Master Plan DATE: February 11, 2007 Dear Mr. Shirk: I have long been a neighbor to the YMCA Estes Park Center, as a summer resident since 1956 and a year-round resident since 1977. Here are my concerns with the YMCA Master Plan, which comes before the Commission on February 20,2007. I want to bring to the Estes Valley Planning Commission's attention a proposal by the YMCA in its Master Plan that has outraged many local residents here along Larimer County Road 69B (Tunnel Road), hereafter called Spur 66. The Master Plan was revised as recently as January 17, 2007, giving the YMCA option to build three reunion cabins, with a total occupancy of 126 persons, along a previously undeveloped section of Spur 66. While the Master Plan describes other potential sites on the YMCA property that may be used for these accommodations, it has come to our attention through candid conversations by YMCA staff members with neighbors and the Colorado Division of Wildlife that the Spur 66 site is the preferred site and should be viewed by the Estes Valley Planning Commission members as the one which willlikely be developed. I would like to remind the Commission members that the proposed accommodations would be situated in one ofthe remaining stands of aspen in the Estes Valley, including the east slope of Rocky Mountain National Park. As you know, elk have devastated this dwindling resource in recent years. However, the aspen grove proposed for development is still in fairly good shape and is home to many birds and other wildlife. Using the footprint of other Reunion Cabins built by the YMCA in recent years for comparison, the proposed accommodations would remove nearly 5 acres ofprime aspen habitat with forest setbacks to buildings, parking, roads, and utilities. There may be little fall color left to draw visitors to Estes Park, but the upper Spur 66 valley remains a superb example. One ofthe benchmarks that the Commission members have to judge the merits ofany proposal placed before them are assurances by the developers that adequate funding will be made available to bring any proposal to fruition. The YMCA relies heavily on contributions to accomplish the financial goals of the Estes Park Center. As a result, past development could be classified as opportunistic rather than strategic. And in fact, donors have had a great deal to say in how their money would be spent. Make no mistake that implementation ofthe Master Plan before you will be compromised in the same way. Poor maintenance is a prime example of what will suffer with insufficient funding. In fact, a group of Spur 66 residents have taken it upon themselves to pull and dispose of noxious weeds along the site of a water line laid through that area a few years ago because the YMCA apparently does not have the staffor money to be good stewards of their own property. It has been difficult to mount a coordinated community response to this new proposal on such short notice in the winter when many residents are away. However, please consider that more than 130 people signed a petition urging the YMCA to drop any development plans along Spur 66 back in September 2006, when the Master Plan then called for staffhousing to be built in this area. We have also discussed a proposal with YMCA staffto place the Spur 66 corridor into a conservation easement, along with the Big Thompson River and Glacier Creek corridors bordering Rocky Mountain National Park. Those talks are currently stalled on the issue of funding. We encourage the Commission to weigh in on this important topic. I urge the Estes Valley Planning Commission to deny the YMCA ofthe Rockies Estes Park Center of any development along Spur 66 proposed in the Master Plan under consideration. Historically, in the hundred year operation of the YMCA Center, this perimeter has been kept undeveloped and should remain a natural buffer of scenic green space and wildlife habitat for generations to come. 4 7 \ <Ae-Ph David TiÂ»eyer, PE / Page 1 of 1 Dave Shirk From: AIratiemeyer@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:40 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Y Masterplan Dave Shirk Community Development Department PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Shirk: It is a privilege to address you about a section of Spur 66 as its now exists. As travelers and local residents round the cut coming upon the last half mile of road before the Tunnel, they experience an unexpected and exceptional stretch of scenery. We are very grateful that that unique pocket of nature has been protected in part by the Open Spaces element of the Y's Master Plan and by Spur 66's open spaces pact But "Open Spaces, "', Master Plans," and "Pacts," are only as good as the next exception allows. Any multiple housing of people in the preserves along that road would degrade the nature of the entire area. The EVPC holds that protection in its hands when it reviews the Y's proposal for compromising the pristine Aspen Grove across from The Summit. As members of a family that has, for the last 53 years, occupied and preserved one section of that half- mile, we respectfully address the EVPC. Please, may it recognize the weight of its decision as it reviews the Y's proposed change of its Open Spaces plan for the Aspen Grove. Respectfully, Reverend Raymond and Alma Tiemeyer 2/14/2007 ( Page l of 1 Dave Shirk From: dragonfly1015@netzero.net Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 6:11 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: RE: Y Master Plan and Spur 66 In the 1950's my parents built on property along Spur 66. That property remains in the family to this day. As a concerned community member I want to express my objection to the Y Master Plan. The project that is proposed would have a negative impact on what remains to be one of the last untouched areas of Estes Park. There are rare groves of Aspen and abundant wildlife that only those who live in the area and witness on a daily basis can emphasize what a loss this would be. I am asking you to please reconsider the site the Y has chosen on which to expand it's operation. The area along Spur 66 is simply not an appropriate are on which to build such a project. Thank you, Patricia Tiemeyer Vo 11,400 SW 27Th Street Lincoln, NE 68523 2/12/2007 C C Margaret Nickless Hage 9801 Mohawk Lane Leawood, KS 66206 B I v: t,rl'14'f ): 1:1'111 f Â·0 : ' I, 1 Mr. David Shirk Town of Estes Park Development Department Estes Park, Colorado Dear Mr. Shirk Sad news! Our beautiful Spur 66 might soon be changing. Turning from the commercialization to the section beyond Dunraven Inn always feeds our souls. Each time, we anticipate and enjoy the peace, quiet and beauty along that short stretch . "Please, please do not let this ever change" consumes my thought process.. I have always hoped the land along the easement would be given to the Trust Foundation and preserved for future generations. The news that the YMCA might include in its master plan, details for three reunion cabins, of course, concerns me. The increased traffic, loss of natural and scenic views, additional pollution are only a few of the factors contributing to this. On behalf of my family, some of whom have been vacationing along that route since 1926, I would like to send my objection. The fifth generation now summers there. In addition, I would like to suggest the property along Spur 66 should remain part of the Ys Open Space and that it be included in any conservation easement. Thank you for your dedication to providing a beautiful vacation place for thousands of visitors yearly, for preserving the unbelievable beauty and majesty of the area and for protecting land for the future. Sincerely, )11.Ji42 ( Dave Shirk Town of Estes Park Community Development Department PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 February 6,2007 Dear Mr. Shirk: I would like to submit the following comments to the Estes Valley Planning Commission, in regard to the YMCA ofthe Rockies' Master Plan. I understand the EVPC will review the Y's proposal at the February 20th meeting. My family owns a cabin on Wind River Drive, about a mile up the road along Aspen Brook. The property has been in our family for over 30 years, and we spend most of our summers at this cabin. I can appreciate the desire of the YMCA board to grow and develop their organization, but I am concerned at the prospect of substantial plans for building on new sites. I am particularly concerned about the proposal to build up to three family reunion cabins off Spur 66, across from the entrance to the Summit. Spur 66, especially as it winds past the Y and up to East Portal is, at present, a beautiful and green stretch of road. We often hike the trails that run along Spur 66, and appreciate the wildness ofthis corner ofthe Y's land. I would be very sorry to see this quiet corner of the Y enveloped by buildings. From what I understand, no environmental assessment has been made of the proposed development. I worry that this stretch of land may serve as an important corridor for wildlife in the area. I hope that EVPC will approach development along Spur 66 with caution and good sense and will seek the input of wildlife biologists or other experts. I also worry about the aesthetic impact of building in sight of the road. The most important asset the town of Estes Park has is its natural beauty, and every effort should be made to preserve as much ofthis as possible. I encourage EVPC to recommend that YMCA build reunion cabins on one of the other potential locations. Cordially, 4 Yvu# 9- lessica Pierce Madden TO: Estes Valley Planning Commission FROM: Dorothy Day Ciarlo owner, "Day Cabin" property at 2831 Dorsey Drive, originally described as Lot 5, Overlook Subdivision, on the grounds of the Estes Park Conference of the YMCA) RE: Comments on the YMCA Estes Park Center Master Plan History of our private property within the YMCA: The land on which our cabin is built was purchased by my parents, Paul and Mildred Day, in 1940, from a private property owner, Sarah Warfield. My parents had rented a nearby Y cabin through the late 1930's. My father, a biochemist, built the Day cabin himself during summers over the next few years. Our family has resided in this cabin for part or all of every summer season, and for short periods during the winter, ever since it was built. We consider ourselves part of the "Y" community. Our comments on the Master Plan: First, we commend the current YMCA administration for creating this first master plan. We are pleased with the clearly stated goals of historical preservation and environmental sustainability. We also support the plan for the "core area" and the re-vamping of traffic and parking. The YMCA has long needed more planning, and we are happy to support this effort. However, we are concerned about three matters in particular: ' The expansion of potential occupancy, especially of 26 new guest cabins outside of the "core" area. This appears to us to go against the stated goal of improving guest experience. At present, in the height of the summer occupancy, the sheer number of guests feels crowded. In particular, the increase of this many cabins in the peripheral areas will, in our view, subtract from the unique natural character of the area. My family is concerned that the increased traffic, greater number of roads and buildings, and sheer population density will negatively affect everyone's enjoyment. e The stated goal of paving more roads. While certain parts of the "Core area" need to be paved and improved, we are hopeful that the majority of peripheral roads leading to guest and private cabins not be paved. Asphalt paving, and additions such as curbs and sidewalks, are appropriate for the Core area, but are unnecessary in the out-lying areas and significantly detract from indigenous native growth and the natural character of the environment In addition, asphalt paving leads to faster and increased vehicle traffic; families with small children and elderly persons regularly enjoy walking on these roads. We are particularly hopeful that Dorsey Drive will not be paved with asphalt. â€¢ Creation of new second "Y" access from the "Water Project" road (Spur 66). This will in our opinion interrupt and degrade this very special wild wetland area along "Wind River." Many families (including our own) enjoy walking and experiencing native flora and fauna and constantly changing habitat. It would be a great loss to cut a road through this area. It would also affect the transition for wildlife that this area provides for nearby Rocky Mountain National Park. Thank you for consideration of our concerns and suggestions. Â£0 1.8~~, WAV CLIA4 Dorothy Day Ciarlo 2217 Holyoke Drive Boulder, CO 80305 303-499-8321 or dciarlo@comcast. net Page 1 of 2 Dave Shirk From: Dorothy Lehmkuhl [dorlehmkuhl@excite.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:34 AM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Letter to be distributed at EV Planning Mtg. Attachments: Transfer file attachments.wpd Included below and attached is a letter to the Planning Commissioners for distribution to their Feb. 20th meeting packets. This letter objects to only one aspect of the YMCA Master Plan proposal. Please confirm receipt of this letter. Thanks ! Dorothy Lehmkuhl, 3255 Tunnel Road, EP February 13, 2007 Dear Estes Valley Planning Commissioners: Re: YMCA Master Plan Proposal This letter registers my opposition to one aspect of the YMCA Master Plan proposal which is on your agenda for the Feb. 20,2007 meeting. I have seen the whole plan and congratulate the Y for its forward thinking. There is one aspect of that plan, however, which I find objectionable: Developing the beautiful aspen grove along Tunnel Rd/ Hwy. 66 into three family reunion cabins (totaling about 15,000 square feet) along with the asphalt required for driving and parking. In order to accomplish this plan, most of that aspen grove there, where elk lie regularly, would be decimated. We are heartsick to think that the Y is more interested in urban development than retaining one of the few remaining aspen groves in the area. Among other reasons, that land is invaluable because it continues the east/west elk corridor that begins with Thunder Mountain Park's open space. As you probably know, the elk need such corridors more than ever to encourage them to continue their historic migration patterns, since, with the overpopulation of elk and the attraction of non-native flora used around human structures, as much as 25% of the elk now do not migrate into the mountains during the summers. (The 23% figure comes from Rocky Mountain National Park's Elk and Vegetation Management Plan.) Please remember that in 1995 the YMCA of the Rockies participated in the planning of the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan, which was a cooperative agreement between a number of agencies that included the National Park, Colorado State University, the Town, the County, neighborhood associations, etc., which urged the retention ofthe rural natural beauu Of that region. That plan specifically recommended the retention of the aspen grove in question, and the plan was adopted by the Larimer County Commissioners. As you know, that document was non-binding, but now the YMCA has chosen to ignore the important intent of that corridor plan and wants to proceed with it's own agenda. While the property does indeed belong to the Y and technically they have the right to do what they want with it, we feel that being good stewards of the land would involve retaining as much green space as possible along public thoroughfares. With over 800 acres of land, surely the YMCA can find a more appropriate place to build these huge buildings and their adjacent asphalt, without devastating so much virgin land along Spur 66. We feel that a Christian organization should be more interested in the good ofthe environment and the community that in it's 2/13/2007 Page 2 of 2 own interests. Despite repeated objections from residents along Tunnel Road/ Hwy. 66, Windcliff, and Thunder Mountain sub-divisions, the Y is not only proceeding with its plans, but moved the date of its proposal to the EV Planning Commission up to the February meeting - a time when the largest possible number of residents who might object to the plan are conveniently gone for the winter. (As a perfect example: Although we arefull time residents there, we are in AZ right now.) We live just a few doors beyond the property in question and constantly observe sightseers slowly plying that road, keenly enjoying the quite rural beauty, the wildlife, and the wonderful fall colors. If you want to retain Estes Park as a magnet for sightseers, allowing this grove to be devastated will be just one more step toward permanent annihilation of more open space in our Valley. Please understand the impact that greatly increased traffic on Spur 66 will have on the wildlife and the neighbors. Rather than maintaining it's traffic within the YMCA grounds, the Y wants to move the traffic of 120 people plus staff out onto Spur 66 during our busiest season. Finally, we have been kept awake by late night noise from more distant YMCA cabins in the past, and are very concerned about the increased chances for noise from the proposed development on our quiet neighborhood. Don't listen to platitudes.' People at the YMCA have suggested that the aspen would not have to be disturbed and that noise will not be a problem, but I challenge you to walk the property and try to understand how that would be possible. Look very closely at the actual detailed plans and you will see that it would be impossible to build those "cabins" without total disruption of the property and considerable impact on our neighborhood. Please, please limit the YMCA to building on its inner confines and away from public thoroughfares. Thank you for your careful attention to this matter. Sincerely, Dorothy Lehmkuhl 3255 Tunnel Road, EP 586-7390 / Cell: 481-9336 Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! 2/13/2007 Page 1 of 1 Dave Shirk From: MLKelly [mlkelly@kingwoodcable.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:08 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: "Y" Plans for Tunnel Road Dear Mr. Shirk, I am the owner of 2 1/4 acres at 3235 Tunnel Road and am writing to you concerning the "Y" property on Tunnel Road (Spur 66). After vacationing in Estes Park for 25 years, my aunt and uncle (Sybil and B.P. "Boots" Faubion, former General Secretary, National YMCA) bought this property in the late 1950s. This was their "home" as they had always rented in New York. I have many wonderful memories of my time at the "Y" growing up as I spent summers with my aunt and uncle. I have rarely missed a summer at the cabin in 47 years and it is very dear to my heart. In a couple of years, my husband and I plan to divide our time between our home in Texas and our cabin. While the entire Estes Valley is a special and beautiful place, Tunnel Road is especially unique. It has it all -- beautiful mountain views, aspen groves, abundant wildlife, privacy, and peace and quiet where you can sit on the deck and enjoy the sounds of the river down the hill. "Y" guests, traffic, and noise pollution would certainly destroy most of what makes it such a wonderful place. People hiking through our property from the "Y" is already problematic. Developing that area would undoubtedly exacerbate this situation. I am also particularly concerned about the negative affect to the deer and herds of elk that we so enjoy watching, as well as the overall rural feeling ofthe area. I believe it would be beneficial for the "Y" to restrict future building to the core area. There is plenty of land and this is much more logical as it would be close to the heart of the "Y" and within walking distance of all of the amenities the "Y" has to offer its employees and guests. I truly hope the "Y" will desire to maintain good relations with the residents of the area and let this portion of land remain undeveloped for environmental and conservation purposes. . Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Maxine Kelly 4118 Valley Haven Kingwood, TX 77339 281-359-6949 2/14/2007 Page 1 of 1 Dave Shirk From: MBushn3016@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:19 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Tunnel Road Issues Dear Dave We are writing to express serious concern about the YMCA plan for ultimately developing more family cabins on the Tunnel Rd property. While the Y has many positive programs to offer, they have grown so dramatically, that noise pollution and traffic congestion have presented problems for residents with private homes (We are members of the John Timothy Stone Cliff Assoc.). Our exit from Cliff Rd. to Tunnel Rd is already dangerous - cars traveling at high speeds from Thunder Mt., Y cabins, and campgrounds are not seeing the warning signs. Aesthetically, further development would impact this small valley area in a negative way. It's already a small town.. We hope that at the meeting tomorrow, some wise heads prevail. Thank you Peg and Walt Bushnell 2/13/2007 ( ( Page 1 of 2 Dave Shirk From: Jack Vernon [fac026@binghamton.edu] Â· Sent: Monday, February 05,2007 7:29 PM To: Dave Shirk CC: BeidlemanC@aol.com; Larry_Gamble@nps.gov Subject: YMCA Master Plan Dear Members of the Estes Valley Planning Commission, I write with regard to the YMCA of the Rockies Master Plan. I have long been both a neighbor and a local member of the Y, whose land borders mine, and have long made use of the Y's facilities as well as contributed to its summer programs. First, let me say that I am impressed by the planning document which the Y has filed with the Estes Valley Planning Commission. Having attended one of Mark Holdt's sessions during the summer when he introduced the Y's Twenty-Year Plan, I was already familiar with the changes proposed for the Y's core area, which will greatly improve both the aesthetic and pedestrian experience of that area. In the "Visions and Goals for the Estes Park Center Master Plan" I was especially pleased by the Y's stated commitment to "create a strong sense of environmental stewardship" and to "promote and preserve the natural environment and beauty of the site." The Open Space that the Y has proposed in the Plan should be applauded as a significant contribution to that commitment. However, the Open Space also contains a glaring exception, as made clear in the "Site Inventory" section of the Master Plan, which show three potential sites for family reunion facilities on Spur 66 across from the entrance to the Y's Summit Property. I participated in the 1994-96 neighborhood meetings which produced the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan, a document which has been adopted by the Larimer County Commissioners and Planning Staff, and which now serves as a guideline for the Estes Valley Planning Commission. YMCA of the Rockies administrators also participated in those meetings-indeed, most of them were held at the Y-and provided cash and in-kind services toward the production of the Management Plan. As the plan states (on page 8), "The YMCA Camp is a significant attraction in the area, and impacts of future development must be considered on the surrounding area. The highway frontage of the YMCA property is an important buffer/visual/environmental element." When this issue of the Y's "buffer" property on Spur 66 was raised at our meetings, the Y's representatives assured neighbors that their policy was never to build along their highway frontage. Given this statement, and given the stated goal of the Spur 66 Corridor Management P/an to "maintain the unique assets of the area," it is ironic that the Y now proposes to build as many as three reunion facilities on Spur 66 in the heart of its Open Space. Called "cabins" in the Master Plan, these facilities would have a combined area of over 15,000 square feet and combined capacity for up to 120 people. The site for these facilities is an important wildlife habitat, one of the last large aspen stands on Spur 66, and a significant view corridor for people-visitors and residents alike-who drive, bike, jog, and walk on Spur 66. In particular, that site extends the Thunder Mountain Park elk corridor that begins in Rocky Mountain National Park and continues through BLM land, Thunder Mountain Park, and the bottom portion of the Y's Summit. Given the overpopulation of elk in the Estes Valley, it's essential to keep such corridors open, since fewer and fewer elk each year migrate to the mountains in the summer, preferring instead to feed on the non-native flora used around human structures. In short, the biological and environmental value of the Y's buffer property is priceless, particularly given the rapid disappearance of open land in the Estes Valley. Rick Spowart of 2/5/2007 ( ( Page 2 of 2 the Colorado Division of Wildlife has objected to the Y's proposed use of this property for just these reasons-that it is an important wildlife habitat and view shed-and has recommended to Mark Holdt that he leave it undeveloped. And back in September, 133 neighbors of the Y signed a petition in opposition to their plan (at that time) of building staff housing on that site. Reunion facilities would have a similar impact to staff housing, and the petition signers clearly wanted to see the site in question preserved rather than developed. By building such a major development on its highway property-something that the Y has never done in its nearly hundred year history-the Y would contribute to a significant degradation of the very scenic and natural resources that bring visitors to its camp in the first place. Both the Y administration and local Spur 66 neighbors of the Y have recently held meetings with the Estes Valley Land Trust to discuss the possibility of putting the Y's and neighboring properties along the Spur under conservation easement in the future. Excluding this large parcel in order to build reunion facilities on it would make a sham of such an easement. Instead of approving the YMCA's Master Plan without suggested modifications, 1 hope you will urge the Y to remove the potential reunion "cabin" sites on Spur 66 from its Master Plan and instead to locate its future reunion facilities in the other six sites indicated in its plan. Sincerely, Dr. John Vernon 3175 Tunnel Road P.O. Box 20620 Estes Park, Co. 80511 2/5/2007 Page 1 of 1 Dave Shirk From: Ann Vernon [annfrickvernon@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:34 PM To: Dave Shirk Subject: Master Plan of the YMCA of the Rockies Dear Members ofthe Estes Valley Planning Commission: I am writing to encourage the EVPC to carefully evaluate and not approve that part o f the YMCA Master Plan that includes family reunion buildings across from the Summit area on Tunnel Road.Over a period of thirty years that I have lived here, I have seen the neighbors work hard to keep the rural nature of this place. When development has taken place it has been away from the road. The YMCA itself agreed to this idea when it participated in and sanctioned the Spur 66 Master Plan a few years ago. Why should the Y consider this area when there is so much land for this kind of thing in the middle area of the YMCA property. The openspace along the Y border should be a buffer between the large numbers of people who visit the Y and the neighborhood. Visitors to the YMCA could instead use these areas for hiking and repose. Sincerely, Ann Vernon 3175 Tunnel Road, PO Box 20620, Estes Park, Co. 970 586 9121 It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. 2/14/2007 <- =H . Travelers along Spur 66 experience spectacular vistas offorested hilisides, groves of aspen trees, towering snow capped mountain peaks, and rushing streams. Elk, mute deer, coyote, and other wildlife species can often be seen from the road. A drive along the winding two-lane road is indeed a rewarding experience in this semi-rural, mountain setting...The YMCA Camp is a significant attraction in the area, and impacts offuture development must be considered on the surrounding area. The highwayfrontage of the YMCA property is an important buffer/visual/environmental element. -Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan Dear Members of the Estes Valley Planning Commission: The Estes Valley has been my home for 30 years, and I have been a year-round neighbor ofthe YMCA ofthe Rockies, living along Spur 66, for 20 years. The house we live in has been in our family for over 50 years and my husband and I will retire here, so our residency along Spur 66 will outlive the Y's Master Plan which is before you now. Thus while those involved in putting together this plan will likely be long gone from the area when this plan is completely implemented, we will still be living with the realities this plan has put forward. It is for a long-term view of the value of this scenic area ofthe upper Spur 66, which thanks to the vision, dedication and stewardship of the area's residents has been protected such that it looks much like it did decades ago and is unique it its beauty in all of the Estes Valley, that I am making a plea to you to consider carefully your review ofthe Y's Master Plan and how it will impact this area. We commend the Y for pursuing a planning process and for attempting to address the hodge-podge patchwork of improvements and "fixes" that the Y has done around its grounds and with its buildings over the last several decades, and find many of the improvements proposed for the core area of the Y grounds to be likely to lead to a visual and functional improvement of that property. However, there is one component ofthe Y's Master Plan which is a shameful inclusion, disrespectful ofthe Spur 66 neighbors and a blatant violation ofthe Y's commitment to the visual and biological integrity of their Spur 66 frontage and open space corridor. That is the proposal to develop up to three reunion cabins along Spur 66 in the undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit. I was a member of the group of residents from the Spur 66 Neighborhood Association who worked for several years with the YMCA of the Rockies and local government officials on the development of the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan. This group also involved Bob Joseph ofthe Town of Estes Park, as well as Rocky Mountain National Park Associates, Design Studios West, Colorado State University, National Park Service (Rocky Mountain National Park), Larimer County, Colorado Rockies Regional Cooperative, and Estes Valley Recreation and Park District. It was a plan developed with a cooperative spirit and a commitment to protecting the unique assets of the Spur 66 corridor, and most of our meetings were held at and hosted by the YMCA ofthe Rockies. The results of this extended effort were that in 1997 the Larimer County Planning Committee and the Larimer County Commissioners unanimously accepted and endorsed ECE 60 <21 1 V T %4 ' 1,4 4 Â·c ./-/ 1 , : 1 lit, dit p~| FEB 19 2007 .11 M 1. L 19 t t.Â· 2 1 t i the Spur 66 Plan, for use as voluntary guidelines in planning any building or development along the Spur. Back when the Spur 66 Plan was developed, the Y was a shining example of a good neighbor and responsible land steward, in keeping with the Y's Christian values. Those of us who worked on the Spur 66 Plan were grateful for the Y's assurances that their property along the Spur would never be developed. Fast-forward ten years, and in the presentation Mr. Holdt, the Y's Vice President Planning and Development, gave to Y guests about their Master Plan last summer, neither "neighbors" nor "community" were included as one of the 12 relationships that were important to or considered in the Y's Master Plan process. The Master Plan identifies the Y's core values as caring, honesty, respect, responsibility and faith, yet I dare to suggest that none of these values have been demonstrated in the communications and actions of the Y since the Spur 66 neighbors brought their concerns to the Y's attention. Neighbors were never made aware of the Y's Master Plan process, but discovered these guest meetings were occurring and learned there about the Y's proposal for development along the Spur 66 in an area formerly included the "dedicated green space" or "open space". Ironically, Mr. Holdt emphasized several times during his presentation that it was the Y's and EDAW's goal of"not breaking unbroken chunks" in the process of their planned development, and to "put cabins where we already have them." This is not, in fact, what they are proposing to do along Spur 66. Shortly after learning of this proposed development, Spur 66 neighbors began to express their concerns, so we felt it was important to meet with the Y's executives to share these concerns. We did so in September 2006, and presented to them a petition letter with 131 signatures of Spur 66 neighbors. The letter expressed the neighbors' desire that there be no development by the Y along itsSpur 66 property, and that the area in question should remain undeveloped to protect its outstanding scenic and natural assets for all to enjoy in the future, including Y guests, neighbors, and tourists alike. The fact that at that time the Y had staffhousing identified in their plan for this area and in October 2006 proposed reunion cabins there instead, is irrelevant in terms of impact on the rural feeling of the neighborhood and the scenic and wildlife values of the property. The proposed reunion cabins would impact about 5 acres, with a combined building footprint of over 15,000 square feet and combined capacity for over 120 persons. The impacts of this development would include significant destruction of native vegetation, disturbance of wildlife habitat and wildlife movements, the creation of new access roads, heavier traffic flow on Spur 66, increased light and noise pollution, and visual blight. It is important for you to know that my opinion on this level of disturbance is informed by a 30 year career as a professional wildlife and conservation biologist. I have documented over the last 20 years the tremendous diversity of' wildlife species which use this area, including almost 90 species of birds and many species of mammals, large and small. These include species which are generally only associated with undisturbed areas, such as raptors like Northern Goshawk, Cooper's Hawk and Sharp-shinned Hawk, and mammals like bobcat and mountain lion. It is a basic tenet of good environmental planning, including for firms such as EDAW who pride themselves in this area of expertise, that an undeveloped continuous open space corridor should not have a "chunk" ( taken out of it for development. This creates fragmentation of the landscape, which breaks the linkages and connectivity and impacts the integrity and functionality of the habitats, species, communities, and ecological processes in the area. Both EDAW and the Y have violated this tenet by proposing to develop the property along Spur 66. In fact, Rick Spowart of the Colorado Division of Wildlife recently walked this property with Mr. Holdt and strongly recommended to him that the Y choose one of the other sites for the reunion cabins and not build on the Spur 66 site because of the importance of the wildlife habitat there. Because the Y has some 860 acres of property and has proposed six other potential sites for the reunion cabins which are not located along Spur 66, it is my plea that you approve the YMCA Master Plan ONLY ifthere is a stipulation that no development be allowed along the Spur 66 corridor. I also urge you to recommend that the Y pursue a conservation easement for the open space corridor surrounding their property, including this area in question, an action which may have greater economic benefit to the Y now that their tax-exempt status has been denied. We know that the Y has been involved in conversations with the Estes Valley Land Trust about a conservation easement at the Estes Park Center, but, interestingly, there is no mention of a conservation easement in the Y's 20-year Master Plan. I certainly appreciate that private property rights are involved in this discussion, but ultimately our private lands sit within a framework of broader consideration and responsibility. Despite our individual neighbor commitments to good stewardship of this entire area-by retaining native vegetation, reducing habitat disturbance, managing weeds, removing fences, minimizing light and noise pollution, and expressing interest in conservation easements-no other property owner in the Spur 66 area has the power to alter the character ofthis area that the Y possesses, and with that power comes responsibility-to be a good neighbor and good steward of the land. Respectfully, 04Â«.2/ k-1 6Utout_A~~ Carol Beidleman 3245 Tunnel Road Estes Park, CO 80517 DATE: September 1, 2006 TO: Mark L. Holdt, Vice President for Planning and Development, YMCA of the Rockies CC: Kent Meyer, President/CEO, Scott Pope, Vice President/CFO, Gary Van Horn, Estes Park Center Director, and other members ofthe YMCA ofthe Rockies Executive Staff; YMCA Board Members; Phil Hendricks, EDAW, Inc.; Estes Valley Planning Cornmission; Larimer County Commissioners; Town of Estes Park; Larry Gamble, Rocky Mountain National Park; Estes Valley Recreation and Park District; Estes Valley Improvement Association. FROM: Spur 66 (Tunnel Road) neighbors and land owners, Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan contributors, and concerned citizens RE: Petition regarding YMCA Master Plan proposal for staff housing along Spur 66 Dear Mr. Holdt, We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. We are local residents who live on or near the upper Spur 66 corridor, and other concerned citizens. Many of us were involved in the development of the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan, and most ofus are YMCA of the Rockies members who have lived here for decades. We are united in our belief that by including staffhousing at this location, the "Y" is violating its long-standing commitment to not build along the Spur 66 corridor, and is violating the guidelines of the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan, a document that the Y helped to produce. In 1994, a grant from the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund enabled a consortium of residents and governmental agencies to hire Design Studios West and Colorado State University to develop a plan for the future of the Spur 66 Corridor. The result was the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan [Spur 66 Plan], which was issued in February of 1996 and subsequently adopted by the Larimer County Commissioners and Planning Staff, and which now serves as a guideline for the Estes Valley Planning Commission. Among those who contributed cash and in- kind services to this project was the YMCA ofthe Rockies. (pp. i, 9,10) First among the stated goals ofthe Spur 66 Plan is to "MAINTAIN THE UNIQUE ASSETS OF THE AREA," (caps in original, p. 15), which includes the following elements: forested hillsides, mountain vistas, minimal commercial development, clear mountain streams, low development density, open space, well maintained property, wildlife, and rural feeling." (p. 15) Singled out on p. 13 ofthe Spur 66 Plan are the unique strengths ofthe area for which the staff housing is proposed: vegetation along the roadside and "existing groves of aspen." The Spur 66 Plan also notes: "The YMCA Camp is a significant attraction in the area, and impacts of future development must be considered on the surrounding area. The lughway frontage of the YMCA property is an important buffer/visual/ environmental element." (p. 8, our italics) Indeed, at the meetings in which the Spur 66 Plan was discussed, the representatives of 1 111 Or---0 %fi' ~ j FEB 1 2 2007 ~1 ~ ~ 0 f Al j ::Â·.4 d 1.: 311 the Y assured Spur 66 Association members and the representatives of the Town of Estes Park and the National Park that their policy was never to build along the highway frontage. We believe that the Y's intention to build staff'housing along the Spur 66 corridor violates both the spirit and the letter of the Spur 66 Plan. In fact, EDAW, the consulting firm for the Y's Master Plan, has emphasized preserving the natural corridors and perimeter of the YMCA property as "Dedicated Green Space"; yet, the proposed site for staff housing represents a glaring exception to this guiding principle. Development in this undisturbed site would severely impact the scenic vistas and wildlife enjoyed by YMCA visitors and residents alike, creating new access roads, heavier traffic, increased light and noise pollution, and more than doubling the number of houses that now exist on the north side of the Spur beyond the Y entrance. With 860 acres, surely the Y can find other locations for its staff housing that can be integrated into the Master Plan. Alternate sites might include the areas southwest of the livery, north of Pinecone Way, southeast of the large cabins on Mesa Drive, at the top of the Summit, and in the long valley between the paint shop and the Y's main entrance. Staff housing dispersed among these and other locations would reduce congestion in any one location and enable staffto walk to work and emergency medical and fire-fighting personnel to be close at hand. The Y's neighbors have worked hard to implement the Spur 66 Plan and safeguard what the plan identifies as "a scenic mountain valley" with "many outstanding natural assets." Through good environmental stewardship, together we have reduced habitat disturbance, minimized night lighting, removed fences, retained native vegetation, and managed invasive weeds. When the Thunder Mountain Park subdivision was built in the 1980's, members ofthe Dannen family, the developers, met with neighbors to agree upon a Planned Unit Development that would be environmentally responsible to the area and to those already living in the area. The result is a development which is nearly invisible from the road and preserves some of the last meadows and aspen stands along the south side of Spur 66. The remaining meadows and aspen stands, along the north side, are those that will be severely impacted by the Y's proposed staff housing. The objections we voice do not amount to resisting growth or change at the Y. We believe in moderate growth with preservation, a balance cited in one of your informational meetings concerning the Y's Master Plan. Indeed, we believe that most of that plan is a model of careful and responsible development, with many design elements that will improve the appearance and function of the Y's core area. The sole exception is the proposed staffhousing. Surely, a better location or locations away from the highway can be found for that housing. You, as the Vice-President ofPlanning and Development for the YMCA of the Rockies, have a chance to leave a permanent legacy to future generations. No other property owner in the area has the power to alter the character of the local area that the Y possesses; and with that power comes responsibility-to be a good neighbor and good steward of the land. Thank you for listening to our concerns. from the Spur 66 Corridor Management Plan: "Travelers along Spur 66 experience spectacular vistas of forested hillsides, groves of aspen trees, towering snow capped mountain peaks, and rushing streams. Elk, mule deer, coyote, and other wildlife species can often be seen from the road. A drive along the winding two-lane road is indeed a rewarding experience in this semi- rural, mountain setting." We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 1 I i 406 3 29Â£L 1 A hIA C K Â£ 24(11 <14 i u 30-2.1 D %247~)4\ 28 i,) 13% 44\AlAAQ- 1 c 01834(9199' Â»W -3,/59 -f->f-u N es Â« 11/7.t N LA/ , â‚¬ to, irDS 1 -7 5-14- SY-77 31-s--*Â· TAJEr- At<Lul E ~ 00'.177 E- L K.All viv ~Â«1-/Lb S-#.5-4-7 4 1 1 EL -91+<ic{< 9 â‚¬XFOA 4 5 2824 ack POS ( ~ tRio. f TDA Ati ~~Â«0â‚¬_,/54Â£21,1-k-*63 CAR-06 Â©El bLE+U 5 29 5- 71Â£00 El_. 72-0 A.tz> C C APVOL- -in U.<'A En/'aÂ·,t / 74 g 57-EES CA/2'k.. <g'DEI t q. 45 P wi 66 P C.A+33 2 56 - 3 zy-gw ~ TI.,toirlfUL~..ev' 236=ro I UMA-Roact F*51=â‚¬5:% 'TA U 1<-~ Co 806 ( 7 cD j j 5-77 -O-573 41/06 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 0 44Â« 970 -577-091 C . ~A E D |la 6- â‚¬ P 15 -70 T u NNO L K D -E-5-rEs L.or,ve U 40 40 Ifil-2 %(. 614 330nna d-ClÂ£r'<1 272.2- CA~Â¥n.u& 4~n 'll LL--1 humd tr~lk- 1-6.-e~ -ful 4 404/9 f rpah. A (130| e 71.-9 978-52&-78 84 LPREs. 01= EY / A b 22562 &uLU#ik#l~ -u u A 6 4 R.AY 586-/060 1 042)u e< '66( u.> .1.9 240 < 7 ALEK Aw bRA 6 18 5-66- 2-667 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER toll M A /<79 LA k-â‚¬ R D 9-2-04 J-E A U \FE A v e q 970-5 7 6 - 377 2- C _ PKNA& I. 4 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER '9~1)06 710-6769191 o . /1 p ek*-Â»-t-<_. 62/07.*Ay-to-EL- Csrcxce- 2., C~ohnston 1 0, 6 0 /U n he ~ //,h 41â‚¬ 74Â£- 424-4 ~~K_ 1 0 =e U ~cli njlon = 6 60 --1-2 0/19 / kell 9)3-1 o Q 97 0.- -5--6-6. 4 7-70 U lual 9.-WLe= F. 3 ual 44 P k. \ t.7 S c:24 50~0- v-rue Â£ Lv~ UL- 3, F L.4 3-0+{w LeH ILLIG) 9.4 S 0 1 Qvr 7*te- 1- o..C U 9 l' 2 ID u 990 - 576 - 0423 A , 1'3011)(lilit 114 (li ey 130(laut A . 1%1~1 1 Ler 2295 21\ W- 94 1 01/3/66 9 70 - Te 6 - 09 9 3 -674144< 431aff d #ACCUJut 30-73- Ch.03 24 - /9136 u 7JltÂ«Â·Â» 20,+~ 6(466, 4,4 LA MI 44 970-6-56-3913 2 24,0 66, FA Â£d 11 9/ 4/YpudÂ»- al-/r lecy M C.-0 w/<2-5 9 7 0 - g<KG--5-93 6 0-590 9 /62- 6-DraÂ» 200(-,AS .UP. 990-456--36-3 G Â«J V L.. 2690 0-- c-,Â« Rom 1416(0 3...0(2&/~1><(--4Lrr 6 C /161 303 -4-29 -700 8 '22:Ao 5 Tac]-9 D UE Da,overt <10 2022_\ C 24'/O ROGRO TEQAet- CAA, 2~3 91,0-00 r.-1.1~-fâ€¢~-J~ d.31.,19.- 1.~ â‚¬-Â«Â« 3 05 -va 9-7 003- <426(Of9\rv--g-â‚¬ 9.- Â£Â£4 9~ 9#>le (Lst.,0.. 446.jd[tguLPÂ»*00Â©.249.76 4-,=bl JU./9Â·- idâ€¢02-+46,u~ (G %6(e'03 303 - 5-94 -90 723 0Â£ ) (319 â‚¬ CÂ£4-6 2-~ool-- aup L.Â£. Co- 0 r."U.G..H. Â¢ 1 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 4 =3 970 -586 -311-79 L*6473 CGO.0.*-- 9/3100 V /011 z EhEE>/Eg-j 3202'010â€¢ped Â»t<' 2.4 1 a %11LL 9~110(o Sq .LF@ ija,L LE-X\ 5303-1~Jex MouvAL, 1 k < 00 729D67d# v~,u 3460 E~-q LO,# 15,Â£, 01*Kâ‚¬~ , 1 1,57 JD 6 (3(xr*Aâ‚¬,1 3-31 L,tlsna 312&0 94 g.<c_LA-Â¢ Ct,1~ 00.- \)41-443-3 cut.d.Â®-,un=Â· 7/to tic kule-4 A.~1'Zljovw-e 2720 611â‚¬-22% 9 E-Sfes. TR.,r~-' )97'7 1 ! I . 273.0 EACLULL,m:-b, 4(La,u~ GÂ»C,w-ArcIN'Â°'64 1.\ dJOM i Al 1 212. A Â· I A-Db oaf t o Esna .PA- AL,â‚¬1> gog We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 3 4 1-1 fiAAURCAPF c-,n/611. m *foL~ 01.5 802Â«.4 ESTA 247940, CO 805-,7 (PÂ» ) 5.* -008 34,7 69 led i ff Cr D r 978, 4-111 Mary 6. buryea. (970) 546 -DORI ates Park Op foÂ¢,7 CIA 6 K VE K.Vot 3 1 7 9 -7- u N N E i ROAD 9/~64- V.4,Â»,~ E-e~. 2 1 40 6 E-3 YES P A 6 K 1 (5 0. 60 3- C \ (776 \ 5-8 6 9 / 1 1 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER rn ~41 4 9 iG (66 48/6 kulft) 33/5 14(%45**5/1 X ,r We the undersigned urge the YMCA ofthe Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 3145 lk)?71 4 B jl &'PAL,(U,11 G,kil FU, /9_ 30<De fL/4'ner,Dr, LM,TD367,/incd NE49516 #cu.n>*7kf79-41~7Â°,1~'/06 RAVADALD /1.i PRE)%- e (*70) 3-24:3776 j 6(ai)-32,li'l :7_1 121 l j 3.2 9-3 -ru.v,u-L {U, 1367-44-flÂ·rk (54431-ftfflt) 35-00 Faug-Â·En--Dg, apt D367 L -,-Ac,BE.u, 4 E 695'G 6 11-> M i~ j Â«trr . 9<5(06 AL/nA A Tle mevâ‚¬Â» 6/7Â£2)354-3776 6+08 3,22'- 0 991 ' 19 65223 /90.-tki.teL Zlj /C),3.1-; 019, ,1-,Accin,AG i --rld.,..4 Y 25 rn p Sh e e-Â£* )1071+4-. 9/Lâ‚¬V/, a j'Zuy,710Â·,t~~, Atte* 60 Y e'â€ž 0041Â«. / 94 4 Â·- A Â£.e~-,t (30 - DonÂ£>c of \.I ACk.-07._, 4%%$..1- 1991 9, fm#-~24)9 t.~ 9 ] 464 -i r Â¢ 1,_6172' UCUM â‚¬5 U (J /ftÂ·(i:. "?"~ H/15 ALWAYS OBBY<.WD PRH)R AGEE )1Â£N 75 <k/Rj-1}N +46Rlfek) AND Swovu.9 (joR-n\\ 01Â· '1% 00 â‚¬(d VUE MAJE /7 . A 6EEN Â¥Ae.011104(Ne *flitb "F" FoR 40 Vi?ARS, 44#<29 .fflijzo, 2449 An tp 5 3% pms 379*â‚¬51 -014 0 â‚¬2.- râ‚¬113. 17*t 4-It X Â¢&11240, t\AJG-,13*,04[Â£)6â‚¬StbrEL . 0591-3294669 +9 yj c m 9 v3A--1 1 ,/ 1/ 1-lo-Â·06 334)NE PA,-02"-1 346Â«4*Â«-/â‚¬2- . Cj 4-Â· 1 LE 3%VELLF 1 e?*294-9 Akul.4u_jtttrÂ°-Â°5 ouy-i nÂ«e. liz-~ A-. i I -&' -1 ' ~-LÂ£L6~---- *0 -5-0 309<di 4 CNk 1~'A-416 .A trn#1#- A-)0 31+-ikÂ£-4 4 4 fu".tir du#.* 4,4*Ju*Â« 4 YAL, 'rutuEAE-:t/11 YEÂ£. lt)t.*-6 - j 36 A,Â£Au--4-0-+Â·4-2-4 Kocui#44-4*i_ ~~1Â£41+ LUAD/*tted=%" tfukrt*Â£-4 9 f Â£, le *El"-7~<*-%*AILkLRc.&~,~LLLik~*i<Lit"U'â‚¬41-04Â« ,-552L---C/L-'L-0-1C We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 9/05-10L 4839 970 gel Â»Â»J De-a n 4 0-7 6-<9 |ep- 24Â£#s'Alcul L 4 970Â·26-4927 - 06 L-+43 9 la, 11'aljhe, 242/-4- flao Â£166 910 536- 684 ibug J b. flut-1 9lo'106 4,&2 0. @i Ikk 0/16 19 Â£*4% ' *LJAL 71/06 bore/Xy I.1.drn kitt, 7'-434Â·ys- ~1.~.0,ul/U 9 70- L YG , 7 29 0 <\4 - %Â»uu -fe~tÂ»3,Â«JÂ«1 7/3 )06 \U . 8vwu gue 3-195- AH#,â‚¬ C , L -e A M hou l 970 99 6 - 9 34 c 9 76 SE 6 4mj f44.- \U,v#M, 9~1 ~54 ANA \IERIbQ M-)5 TRAMEL M. We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 32 95 72*nnel 1090(d (9/n j Ip eks 7%rk 00 Â· CA, rb ~~ ~Â©- ,fae Â»7001 51 3%4742,0 - 14 (104 4-zor )3 7 i 11900 i .W, 144Â· 1 6 ne 811, 0 6 6 593 3 24 .1.- -r-9-0 J- U . V ./ 9,5---04 toi v Vo (2 406 94Â«LA< C-J - C_FÂ»Â«14 CAÂ« ) 1 1 4 O O g bu 0.-9 +A s f- 1--i h 0, cu 452* 4 y 'C-,1 1 40 2- 410- 1 34 1 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 166< u.), 1 2 946* 929 ~-203(7/ -81 6% 0612 566 - 264 7 <6TLO0k dAÂ·6(1 PRD<' cA Edie Y DoRsâ‚¬M O kLE, YMCA LE,rbA rAO,2Â£ Earba g. 7-rkk 130#27 (brole, ~F)<64Â· 00+1 oak Ca,6,4 afl- 0 41 5 5 *rken 3 }71 11 v~ie | KJ Li=fit:.-.s, 7=...:i-.Ain.-1 V-..:f '.1 1.1.12:=z- L'!94 :.r.-.7.--23: 5.-.7 =-t.=:+ h.-.~5-2-n G:nn L ........... I I.&.......& I ...... L ...UJ... L .... V. MYvia' 'VA J."11 AAVUJULS Ule'4.- iltip:i/ti-:15Â©31152.Orgip/CD_.maSE.pnp-1)~~ElianÂ©in)43 i i LM:5 DEAR PETITION RECIPIENT: Mark L. Holdt. Vice President for Planning and Development, YMCA of the Rockies The party or parties below have presented you with a petition generated at thiscause.org. The petition contains handwritten signatures generated electronically. Your time and consideration towards this effort is much aDpreciated. Opinions expressed do noi necessarily reflect thiscause.org. Administrator - 'ILLY.#,UICUC*U.30.VIV i of 8 9/10/2006 5:29 PM FeIltlon regaramg Y MLA Master Plan proposal tor stati housing alon... http://thiscause.org/p/db_master.php?p=Klanci,0431 1D] 1 1 Page 2 Ontario California USA tedt@epcarroll.com â€¢ '964Â·Â·<jlk'N~~ Member of the John Timothy Stone Cliff 's Â£ L./ 1 Association Edward P. Carroll 24&Ti,IP:8 2294%0PG isCaose.org. Fri, 08 Sep 2006 Watermark must shoW: 3194Â¥233 -a~4?R. -bv elmnt 16:15:37 -0400 x Â»ge/A# 1 i Decatur Alabama United States gtyrka2103h@charter. net Ginaer Tyrka ~4Â£ii"I~9Â®=GAIR&0 -24?Rist&&58 Imnt Fri, 08 Sep 2006 .org. 13:41:31 -0400 Zion Illinois United States hrdsslq@yahoo.com â€¢ Wish more developers had considered then...BAA! NOT building in our now congested area. These protects always seem to start small elmnt Robin Maurer Fri, 08 Sep 2006 watermark must'gnow: 64.iI ~ajt~ar/'I~S ~88$~~~6 ~~i,&~3 -~48flsENMse.org. 10:19:01 -0400 Genoa City Wisconsin United States - jenniferalbertson836b@hotmail.com r.1-1 -"3 02 44** 5.60.5 10-00:33 -0400.-hv elmnt- Â¢Pyri?,11 "?422-44: a*issed af Iniscmuse.org. 4 40 219 Luuu 10'00-49 *1400 ~~Mwit of ~.14,19-il- AntieÂ·ch THinois. 1_]Sti treenevergrowingq@inorshown. com -- =,1 4.- 41 4/2 OR ge= 240â‚¬ 09- aR-44 -0406 =.1,9 94-ne I â€¢ 5'1~-,1. I;..M......4 r.g, val . ir. 0214Â£92-2- /,402&1466 ai ; r..si-a=e-oro. Li 3- G Â£1-7--1-5 #1 A. 1.liC--3 ~11-ilt-2 -SUL-:~ 1 f}Q: RR-44 Jindon 0,&.5,&1_ p ./---4--5- (71 The. 67 44# 7006 20:1478 -640(1 -4,â€¢y abÂ·nne 9=-5Â£â‚¬1-~ :S2,-5 -#* Th u n 7 gec= Oft'tri 499+ :4 4.4'421. Wau)*SseD ai ,n@SLause.orn. -9Â·=/CÂ¢!lildiE 111Ubl. bile-A'. UÂ£*Oil 70: 1 4- 7*i 264/ih Y 77&4. 486*KL& A .-L - -1- Til ._ _ -- 12.. A ...1.1_..... ._....._ _S ./. _1__-i-1-- 5 P.fil,Ulfi 1111110ib UDA iÂ·IKIdill.Ii.ffpulÂ£PSULgiOUd].ilel ill Th. 07 Ce# 94106 18.06-1 6 -0400 a,h./ olm.nt +9444.14 /UJ.U.j. Aiwessen ar inistause.ora. 9-4_ . ./0/ r-_ -lillie illU- 11/ 3+13 Z-1110 Â¥vdle, lild,K Â·!Tillbâ‚¬ 51-lOw. U9011 1 8-64: 16 1-riri FAin cir PET#TiON 1 nfR 0/*00006 i-Â·70 PM Petition regarding YMCA Master Plan proposal for staffhousing alon... http://thiscause.org/p/show_sigs.php?p=Klancir043 1 1DI 1 1 Page 1 Ontario California USA â€¢ Member of the John ~ ON FILE Timothy Stone Cliff' s Association Edward P. Carroll 671,&1|'IP' 224%9Pe Fri 08 Sep 2006 16:15:37Watermark must snow: AN#WY 2~?Rist&32!mot -0400 ~. ON FILE Decatur Alabama United States ~in~r*r#806 13:41:315}tkirrmdr*&ilf 24(misaw.[08! -0400 Zion Illinois United States â€¢ Wish more developers had considered NOT building V ON FILE always seem to start small then...8AM! in our now congested area. These proiects Robin Maurer F~4(0~ Sep 2006 10:19:ol@MIWIY %142w~&00' ~400 -bv elmnt I n IsCaose.org. X ON FILE Genoa City Wisconsin United States ~0~1~~|~~~00:33~~r*~: NMAilÂ°?hi~&2&~i: -0400 ~ ON FILE Antioch Illinois USA Denise Thomeson 13]+~p,IP' 2284Â¥~!68,~tissed at InisCaose.org. 02:38:44 -0400 -by elmnt Fri 08 Sep 2006 09:38:445#atermarR mustsnow: -0400 Y, ON FILE Antioch Illinois USA Christine Kantak Thu 07 SeD 2006 @42;'f23mM~6~~~~J3 ~4~sdM.1/rgt 20:14:38 -0400 Y ON FILE Antioch Illinois USA Mitzi Klancir Thu 07 SeD 2006 81122~*2:~2S# 24Â¥Rls*Nme'grot 18:66:16 -0400 Page 1 Concept and all software (PHP, JS, Java, HTML, FTP) Copyright Â© 2000-2009 to The Darrow Company Â© Z of2 9/10/2006 5:22 PM We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 0 1,10 1 C~Eff- ~14'10,1. L kobl 2Â£,4/1*Tr>7*.Aâ€¢'L-1 E~ SEâ‚¬-62k 9.4/ 0 -51 -=[32-Â«A~'uM r--=r 1 41 0~-7.96 3(.tt- 2*0/6# 9) 5-hco-u (JuL 44Qf/ Iulit 'MONZA k IGSIZeR/14(-1 Th.,E.F. 596- 5262 CLUJ~11_0-64 04723, *k.,lp23 3Â» 3'0civ 516 -2-a/3 r~03(2(2) *ir#F~*fil/*tiall -Dge N Uitt- 34 60-&1 le-el*tr. br. 82526.'6<A -3-25 6 Ch *Latrk/' li) 'dD--/ 1-0 A Ls* 3 4 34 D Â£4~ le o [14 CLI rcle Ar 5 26 - 41 2-1 4 44Â£- jo)414 14/ 1 9-Tr- 3461._EAG~Ecu ar 2 2.-Dz.#p 586-/69* jÂ»4*yee ilm.,40. :90\/dE / REM BLE- 1 % 65- ub Â£10 6 l.1 FA- 1-3 9 U \ .5-16- 292 7 Liz- A OA i R.-00' 20Â· Be>6 -1150, 6, P. ~/AÂ«, d 805,7 ,1<- 31 ~---AL/,4 nk&w#~A 8-97% 94}â‚¬K_ 926Â¢7 Â£7&0~.2~~0424 FRANCED MARV(A) 4.7/0 EACLE eÂ»PA Dle i We the undersigned urge the YMCA o f the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER - A 9 -/6 '-O 6 9 0 1 5 3 1 SE Mon,lj Tka it c*04 JU*J<Q,Ilf EA-,a,id 4241-c helt 6.1: 9051 9 (94579 -1404' C\A . 0 41 'toiDA /531 ST. hkerrz--TE:Ail- ~ Le_41#1gb c 320 NAg:roe-~ LE, GUR,mELL E P -YDS 1 -7 (176) 577 -/ *fE We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 1 6120 9~9~01, Elle-n, 61Hhs 4513 1844 D~ 5%313,-58 6.1 A (juDCÂ«v6-g\gLI1022Â« Cit {9104 CIALL,licâ€¢ tr. 5ut, /1:.â€¢Li. 3 41- 9 2 g /3 W, ...)043 DA.St+Bil 6, A - Ed".4-1- 4%4 J.14(7N<OiEDESTL 2-911 KliÂ·~809 DR. 5-&6-0,209 -Deb974 -1722# 57 9 I u C 06 Deb orok -121'or 2-614 Curnalus Dr. 594-4105 t*U k,30Â· <lz~O thi (06 Er.ac'/ey Niyfor 1614 Curvtu-Its Dr. 596-Â¥705 44 vi.-4.07)1 . LeÂ£,yz,u q~,t~06 GRACEM.KIELW\6 1115 Al,InBUâ‚¬,DE -52 6-Bbc>3 2- GE,16447 0.-0.* 0.+P,7,tr-cu a.44,H ZUUÂ«2ud *LUU tuppee@ We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently iveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for pennanent staff in an undeveloped ea ofaspen, ponderosapine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. IGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER WAIvo~+L. )37.-~e_- 1 S-05- CI ,- ,-us L Aw e_ / A 6-5.-pe-~ fAF-IC; CO FDj-/7 MAn/7/Lf/23 LMEHZ... 5,qvrfrzooc A For .-- oL.9 Bo. rbir#- 8Â°7, CIL /U G %~84% 841- *_9 k/ 8 6 f'05 0 '1 1 V AGIJ; A 2 4 0 0 / v / n 1 0 0Â£(1 ----L)*-9 0 â€¢L__.,_,_~ Â¤Nfl 60 - Â£ ./7 41')4 A.n Ulht 9 70 -- .<94\-2 % 901 - 20-1 ,///~f -V<, 4 C .24 00 2>trij~ ' C.-_ 1 44.\\~91 010 , WV fe/fi.IA,-4.-'R , 4222,4 /30: Â¥70 -44-1-zg'ob 90~fil "We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER Â·7 A . 15.09 2, AL<#-36.4 e -"29/ Â»:52Â» 687 e & P/9,2-K, C O 805 11 7 ----'.-94 <.(...~St o-106 ~~,tHARD~ ~H,7 H 970 - 586-94/4 1 fmonc*nÂ© JfhdA- fAARGEng. 3 RIJA - We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER WA l eo Al-L 13-U~Fib- 1 S--05- cik '-- us L Aw e- 6-54--LI lpAAC-/ CÂ° FDJ-/7 -j_ip*&:t..50Â£1-2 zoo c U I 0 5703- .-, 0Â«Jp 80- rb Â£ r, 8 7 UL 1-4 8 43VTV~aE-'-'Â¥~D46~0--4.-1Â¥1 * 1 . r 0 5 0 U 444.76 2<4 7 6 lot laÂ« S '400, 2 PA 9,0-9 7 3 -9 3-9 3 %3 a z. e; de,24 s Ln . Â¥45-1 3 2 . f We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently / unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped ~ area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 0- A 77-A ado, 2-0 64 MBÂ«10510 A 5-6) 3 C ir\-us Lawl< Q. /\/4 6 0%r Ju G r wy, g.sl-es P.-r k c_c / J 1 70 -596-838% 805/1 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER $.JA I '., 0 , -1- t . 13 U j 4 c_- 1 E--O 5- C i k hus L 4/U 2- aLÂ«3 A E 5 -f-Â£ 5 )~Ap- IC I (9 eD -S- 1 7 ' C - 3 i Â¥ 100 L e 32Â·r I O 9 65 CAA/UU, tj 2 ? -1 /9 f>ort,1./'tfk- 230rfe- 024-2 /U d ra s , 7 g clooard_ Dheeker- -2-73# At'n,douS Dr. 2-54Â© Park,Co, 309/1 42Â«2.74~2/f'V A 527 29 A/,P# LAs Dr, CO A }171 e 2 131,6-eler 2 Stes l ark, C D . 2 6 57 7 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER f l 1711,4 Co~m ofl-v,y j\g. 4-77--7/(Ct O/442% 9<4 23(# 75. %03 jn> 172-5c?V--Â¥A v-~u-(>~~~~~ 5-17-1'T \ 6--321~ c \ QUAL /1 Al- C,M.Ug..j Llji mÂ»-A.~~ 91-1 fu J--70-4 Ci.imullus-br. 5-11--7042-1 4 Qmjl~ (31 )146 34 1 \ 4, r,00,Â·a 6. 97 7-9 7 19- Â·v/ 6 - r V, 14Qx Pe v 9 fqkt 1-lig:- N Ap-L.-9 + 584-Â·7\4 -2 (4,-744</L'.~ 41%1~810 629 + 947Â£JA# 596 ** 1/92--. 7 We the undersigned urge the YMCA ofthe Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently - unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area ofaspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER Lapoiusle) kA.14. 31-3 -F- 06 A A-' 11 10# 4- -, 6 #t--pe rs Ls,Al & E. fe.\':4 2*;14&.14.ne,-iku 4 12 g yes ~#AA, 6 0 . -0 6 to Â¥70-51*-59'52 4.... // 492-*Ret 86&- MARMRET -m1 2-lANK 4/4 E-kM Al/14 12-5TE:r PAR,1~)0kl>. 970-424-170-6 014 (~<tr9|410, Mi\24'ARâ‚¬i- C. Mal-1 462 ELM Ava ESTES 'AAK. C 03 09 11 910 ISÂ» - 300% 4. '*-,â‚¬r *V sltI) LeD B.H.Wi â€¢~|9~ 04 0-62_ -aâ€ž- Hye j 46,0.-+ 49*577 - '976 - -t##5 ' 4*014 222Z/ RN ~ 00 4Msâ‚¬44,4 Clked, 66516 Abk, 24-~ - 1109 -RAir,6.6_cAA 9~~24.1& /~/te -29 mar,6 AUr,al b,/06 244 A,ul do GFOS/7 970586-9589 -3646@40144 2*51-44 4. a 9097 0~Pti~&70 O :f 9-0-4_3 4.-rba-,-o LE i lÂ« 9/,0}66 9)0 - -391Â«4/% , YOU 400 Es*, /1 0, 4, 67 Ro#,0 1. Â»l_ 90Â£--4 |Jol /6.61,4 -2/. 9 05,-7 170 -3 52Â· 33)-9 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administation to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped irea of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. ;IGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER e...92clu-JA c- J.trAr= ReCHMAR.aT -1 4 CL C.(rL.C+1 A IN-6 60-1 Es-re. pe. Le â‚¬3 Os,7 4-4.Ob 566-1945 C F=â€¢-â€¢,â‚¬Ae.1 tul'.A Kide,1- A-o,wy 7,;4.,6 j ~ -1 45- tkh&,1ibz*i h-- <~4*, 1/~LA</414-62//1-t 44%1 n 9- Il-eL Rgic,hhir#(+ 9-12 - 5-86 -5-9 4 y 1+9 7 'tk, 06 76 611 Uthle vistas of forested hillsides, groves of aspen trees, toweringsnow capped mountain peaks, and rushing streams. Elk, mule deer, coyote, and olher wildlife species can often be seen from the road. A drive along the winding two-lane road is indeed a rewarding experience in this semi-rural, mountain setting." We the undersigned urge the YMCA ofthe Rockies aezz,inistration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staffin an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 23 \L -46 ..bas AR#4â‚¬ K. Ot~JU<3 Or i#1- 970 5%6 3364 Gra_ PAL, Cze 9/t~ /OL 00547 31.-n <u r 01Â«*u 27-/4 441â‚¬4 121 10-.4 a 5 . 8,/&â‚¬1 64 fowk e o 1/â€ž /6 6 7 3-0, 574 -33Â¢ 7 205ll- *t 11 unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area ofaspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. - SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER *1(Gru.~ Vo N K BY# I l 1<5 /9 N,M:64$ pr flinc<Â« c -Sy<(I ES'fas PArk Co 909 /7 C ~9 7 4 0/ AA+UEUL.> c We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses forpetmanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER /4 4 ( 60/, yo /2 \ 0.,4 2. L * 'L i } 5, fÂ¢ Â· 2 w 4 7 141--Ct.-L- C *>r #2/Ld Â£ cca (70 u /9 5 . ... 1645, W: Alt Lr, et- UL Â« fifi Al. CÂ»Wa 6-4 % 2,/Jif- Â«6- -2467 - We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year MasterPlan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 3~--CL- 904 -&4*d C. 1,â‚¬RE /64 1 Woo, 94 W WAIL 1Â» Ates 7 We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER /*loqGQOCU__39(41 /1~14.4 e.Â£00; /11Â£T k, 33Â£-TÂ«.14 (EA Â· â‚¬*.3 Fovt< O<607*392 Cf ke Wi // 6 rn) TY-42~L Lc$23~~ Mollit- Rjjwa 1 25305 -Funnit- ito ad Eate G Park (foÂ©335~ tb We the undersigned urge the YMCA ofthe Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 2-4 0 7 /0,+1 B 615 6 gs res 6-2-AE-) C~:~ , 0- 5,-4,:te-- K,L,6â‚¬c*ri /4-~A r-@ 4--P-)83 Ut / @ 74 3-+G- ~-7 d~7 frwln-L K. #%;WWL 9Â»--1 'ALLe b~~..e~_- r k., 4 - -0, r- / LAM'--9 bec,Ke,+F_ AL Der<id,come L B v B & \ -4-* O--LAA i f f K ,-4&e l,- 3 3 0 0 N i A'>0 5 ~w :ve-- as te i M e 1-kn j C m 1(-0 S.- 1 -1 e m,041 01<34deve,ClAC,Do.ce'. the Y assured Spur.66 Association members and the representatives ofthe Town ofEstes Park - and the National Park that their policy was never to build along the highway frontage. We believe that the Y's intention to build staff housing along the Spur 66 corridor violates both the spirit and the letter of the Spur 66 Plan. In fact, EDAW, the consulting firm for the Y's Master Plan, has emphasized preserving the natural corridors and perimeter ofthe YMCA property as "Dedicated Green Space"; yet, the proposed site for staff housing represents a glaring exception to this guiding principle. Development in this undisturbed site would severely impact the scenic vistas and wildlife enjoyed by YMCA visitors and residents alike, creating new access roads, heavier traffic, increased light and noise pollution, and more than doubling the number of houses that now exist on the north side ofthe Spur beyond the Y entrance. With 860 acres, surely the Y can find other locations for its staffhousing that can be integrated into the Master Plan. Alternate sites might include the areas southwest of the livery, north ofPinecone Way, southeast ofthe large cabins on Mesa Drive, at the top ofthe Summit, and in the long valley between the paint shop and the Y's main entrance. Staff housing dispersed among these and other locations would reduce congestion in any one location and enable staff to walk to work and emergency medical and fire-fighting personnel to be close at hand. The Y's neighbors have worked hard to implement the Spur 66 Plan and safeguard what the plan identifies as "a scenic mountain valley" with "many outstanding natural assets." Through good environmental stewardship, together we have reduced habitat disturbance, minimized night lighting, removed fences, retained native vegetation, and managed invasive weeds. When the Thunder Mountain Park subdivision was built in the 1980's, members of the Dannen family, the developers, met with neighbors to agree upon a Planned Unit Development that would be environmentally responsible to the area and to those already living in the area. The result is a development which is nearly invisible from the road and preserves some of the last meadows and aspen stands along the south side of Spur 66. The remaining meadows and aspen stands, along the north side, are those that will be severely impacted by the Y's proposed staff housing. The objections we voice do not amount to resisting growth or change at the Y. We believe in moderate growth with preservation, a balance cited in one ofyour informational meetings concerning the Y's Master Plan. Indeed, we believe that most ofthat plan is a model of careful and responsible development, with many design elements that will improve the appearance and function ofthe Y's core area. The sole exception is the proposed staff housing. Surely, a better location or locations away from the highway can be found for that housing. You, as the Vice-President ofPlanning and Development for the YMCA ofthe Rockies, have a chance to leave a permanent legacy to future generations. No other property owner in the area has the power to alter the character ofthe local area that the Y possesses; and with that power comes responsibility-to be a good neighbor and good steward ofthe land. Thank you for listening to our concerns. from the Spur 66 CorridorManagement Plan: "Travelers along Spur 66 experience spectacular vistas of forested hillsides, groves ofaspen trees, towering snow capped mountain peaks, and rushing streams. Elk, mute deer, coyote, and other wildlife species can often be seen from the road. A drive along the winding two-lane road is indeed a rewarding experience in this semi- rural, mountain setting." - A A 1/.\ 't Ork /4, 2-006 (27x l.4 unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. - SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER /0 0 LOT 19 7844*LAYbURTAâ€¢*t '*vit. 6. Il 1-10/ne-Z -ZP=7Â£.2 /4118452 CO. alr 4 D.. 91/9/0 6 E.I:@UL A. A,A,*., ANAo,- Co *Â©01- FAmrut TAvEr 303 91 1 -SV 7 0 E - f\AW At\ A REI â‚¬/ A Ilt e Ll A' Leo, c- . U unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff' in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. - SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 21/36 /0-6vs 0-ve EL,445 06-& 60 2 0577 - --- 4/20/or- d..46 Ue-,2 3 â‚¬707%86-3609 C v r-r- 9 Jeftve S (9 618.-C Do, cr- 1. We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area o f aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. REE. C.K..03Â·A-(1 0/'dIS-CS AGO 6.16- UffER-.60, 86=Even.liz> f SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER %11Â¢ A A-Uff- 7-kÂ» G eEST 7~.t,olil-,~~ ct./M" 93 (00 kno (4 4* 1/1 :09 4 3% / - 0,3 99-- (cd Â£-L- 19-V 1 , Y,Â«-0 1-A og*' -Â·rfr-11 11 YMCA GM-IEST C - 1 424JZ.Fc - 49 2 'T -- 7013-i/dic,(59 --4:1, 4DU>161 6itute-ufft 3/ 4 140(rui Â»XiII g 863 - Apa-\585 Ace'ked [ET' CAP-leâ‚¬â€¢ to LaJ \ 1 3<4 1-, #l-Ct 2,37 3, L r \--JLAJOLi /9 U 9 l 3( 0-45 (IÂ»12(0.1-tÂ·>1 YOA \,iwv.NL o. V ->,22 51& 14-0-42-r J ne- tÂ¥-0 05 9-to DS-G--13\,1 W N la-r j 1/16-Le On . 64 *tr Sht-nl 0/-10. _qu--7 - ~ 791 Q.*7942 'I) r-'1 1 v Jyv c) 9(31(45 rel,ic&1Â£% 1- cnflit-~ 226-20-rj Â¢-70 - 5717 - - c 99-1 4-j'ct)â‚¬ 6, +0 . We the undersigned urge the YMCA of the Rockies administration to withdraw from its recently unveiled 20-year Master Plan the proposal to build 10 to 15 houses for permanent staff in an undeveloped area of aspen, ponderosa pine, and meadow across from the entrance to the Summit on Spur 66. 62.gicr R..Eb/\77 014 â‚¬=-01 A-l.=C) AJCyÂ· Uff E.Â·/L (,G B Er-y'oki-13 17 SIGNATURE AND DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 02-00,7 6,4. <~219-2*.~ At-~24 0:149/31134 IARBÂ¢j K Usittiv)4 iutÂ«t-Â·Ckt4tj Pl &,I--, 75 / <120 1, 20111f ~ -3>c c. 4 G 9}4.0 10"4~ 9 /344 RA-rtil-dff~jj Â«0 4\~ -al,?A y(.UMij 4 577.-/95 3 dpit.u' (c,6 AÂ»ke,-cib â€¢ 9[Â·+p, E- 6771 -ciL 9/3,/b G Frelic) Cjtzo en-+ c:582>4 /-=L_-g 6(p Sit- 449 5 lJ 9426 9 /- P' 6, ers e que 9 C 5 C o g L i +J- CL don /~ (10 - A / ..6 3 fiâ€ži~~LLÂ« f ug#64 ~2*4gk-~ 6 *a/Prk . 3.3 - 933 - 97--9 0 6-1<--Ultj L Fl , :27 *MCA VI/ of the t Rockies www.ymcarockies.org 1 800-777-9622 TOLL-FREE 970-586-6088 FAX 2515 Tunnel Road Estes Park CO 80511 December 19,2006 Mr. Robert Joseph Town of Estes Park Community Development Department P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Bob: Please look this package over and let me know if it is complete from your perspective. I would appreciate it if you would just hold on to it as pending until I contact you and let you know i f it is our complete package. In the event that I do not contact you prior to December 24th, then go ahead and consider this our official submittal. Thanks for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, Vice President 4, .* 8 rI"-1 --' th 5 4. *Dll, l r 111 DEC 2 7 2006 ' 1 , 1,2 53 52 Â·7; P~191Â¤m,indEPS,0 r'â‚¬1, R]51!tle.....,CLan.Aft/lronr[leni.it'gi.builds.healt, ly Sw,flt, i i m,u u, iu uouv.fc 4 YMCA ofthe Rockies www.ymcarockies.org 1 800-777-9622 TOLL-FREE 970-586-6088 FAX 2515 Tunnel Road Estes Park CO 80511 December 13,2006 Mr. Robert Joseph Town of Estes Park Community Development Department P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Statement of Intent-YMCA ofthe Rockies Estes Park Center Master Site Plan Dear Bob: This letter will serve as the Statement o f Intent for the YMCA of the Rockies to present its Estes Park Center Master Site Plan to the Estes Valley Planning Commission for review and approval. For the past three years, the YMCA o f the Rockies has been involved in a detailed long range planning process which focused on how we will fulfill our Mission to serve our membership. As part of this long range planning process, we prepared a Master Site Plan for the Estes Park Center with the assistance of EDAW, Inc., a nationally recognized planning firm. The Master Site Plan has been completed, reviewed with our membership and approved by our Board of Directors. This Master Site Plan is conceptual in nature and establishes a framework for how future development will occur over the next twenty-year period. The overall growth anticipated in this Master Site Plan is very limited. The primary focus o f this plan is to improve the experience of our members and the housing conditions for our staff. It also establishes a series of guidelines and best practices in a number of areas including: Member Experience, Architecture, Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation, Roads, Parking, Landscape and Irrigation, Signage, Site and Exterior Lighting, Environmental Sustainability, Storm Water Management, Accessibility and Open Space. We have been careful in our planning process to study sensitive areas and avoid any potential development in those areas. These sensitive areas include: The Estes Valley Ridgeline Protection Area; The Estes Valley Geological Hazard Area; The National Wetlands Inventory Resource Area; The Stream and River Corridor Resource Area and the "High Danger" portions of The Estes Valley Wildfire Hazard Area. This Master Plan will enable us to meet the needs of our members through the thoughtful development of our property, while respecting the natural environment and the property that surrounds the Estes Park Center. Sincerely, / :. 7 e re R.2.4 9"41234- , ~ I---â€¢-I ./*.:' ~-:rN-~==.&/-.-~ - r 1 7 1 1 Mark L. Holdt ! 1 4-4 ~ DEC 2 7 2006 Vice President . j I jj? ,!1 4 0 , Enclosures i C - $ I.-'-I.--Ill'.-/=/.- 60 (31 ~32#& -'Â· n , 4 r:Â·9.-# r.,-Â·h., r r ESTES VALLEY r. UNC . 1 1 f...2 . 4 I L JEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICACION , L ~{1 11 DEC 2 7 2006 1 11 !11 11/ :Pi Ill - Submittal Date: 1,4 0 11 I . r Development Plan f- Boundary Line Adjustment Con ominium-lwap r Special Review r ROW or Easement Vacation r Preliminary Map F Rezoning Petition r Street Name Change r Final Map r Preliminary Subdivision Plat r Time Extension E Supplemental Map r Final Subdivision Plat r Other: Please specify r Minor Subdivision Plat MASTER PLAN F- Amended Plat General Information Project Name YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN Project Description MASTER PLAN Project Address 2515 TUNNEL ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO 80511 Legal Description VARIOUS PARCELS (SEE ATTACHED) Parcel ID # (SEE ATTACHEDBection Township Range Site Information Total Development Area (acres) 889 Existing Land Use YEAR-ROUND CONFERENCE/FAMILY CENTER (ACCOMODATIONS) Proposed Land Use SAME Existing Water Service r Town r Well Ix Other (Specify) EAST P0RTAL WATER RIGHTS Proposed Water Service r Town r Well rx Other (Specify) SAME Existing Sanitary Sewer Service 13[' EPSD r UTSD r septic Proposed Sanitary Sewer Service E EPSD E UTSD r septic Is a sewer lift station required? F- Yes Er No Existing Gas Service E Xcel E Other F None Existing Zoning A-ACCOMODATIONS Proposed Zonin9 SAME Site Access (if not on public street) SPUR 66 Are there wetlands on the site? E Yes F No Has site making been completed? F Yes rk No (NONE REQUIRED) | Primary Contact Information Name of Primary Contact Person MARK L. HOLDT , Mailing Address 2515 TUNNEL ROAD, ESTES PARK, CO 80511 Attachments Ir Application fee ($2,400) i K Statement of intent liE 3 copies (folded) of plat or plan Ir 11" X 17" reduced copy of plat or plan Ir Names & mailing addresses of neighboring property owners (see attached handout) Please review the Estes Valley Development Code Appendix B for additional submittal requirements, which may include ISO calculations, drainage report, traffic impact analysis, geologic hazard mitigation report, wildfire hazard mitigation report, wetlands report, and/or other additional information. Town of Estes Park + P.O. Box 1200 4 170 MacGregor Avenue .s Estes Park CO 80517 Community Development Department Phone: (970) 577-3721 4 Fax: (970) 586-0249 4 www.estesnet,com/ComDev C C Primary Contact Person is FR Owner r Applicant E Consultant/Engineer Record Owner(S) YMCA 0F THE ROCKIES < Mailing Address 2515 TUNNEL ROAD, ESTES PARK. CO 80511 Phone 970-586-4444 Cell Phone NA Fax 970-586-6088 Email MHOLDT@YMCAROCKIES. ORG Applicant Mailing Address Phone Cell Phone Fax Email 1 ~ 1 1 ConsultanVEngineer Mailing Address ~-illiti DEC 27 2006 1?- i ~ -).i ~i Phone -1 3 d il Cell Phone ~ Fax Email < APPLICATION FEES For development within the Estes Valley Planning Area, both inside and outside Town limits See the fee schedule included in your application packet or view the fee schedule online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/Schedules&Fees/PlanningApplicationFeeSchedule.pdf. All requests for refunds must be made in writing. All fees are due at the time of submittal. MINERAL RIGHT CERTIFICATION On July 1, 2001, House Bill 01-1088 became effective. This legislation requires applicants for Development Plans, Special Reviews, Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plats, Minor Subdivision Plats if creating a new lot, and Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps to give notice of their application to all mineral estate owners where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. This notice must be given 30 days prior to the first hearing on an application for development. I hereby certify that the provisions of House Bill 01-1088 Section 24-65.5-103 CRS have been met. Names: NOT APPLICABLE Record Owner PLEASE PRINT: Applicant PLEASE PRINT: Signatures: Record Owner Date Applicant Date Contact Information r. 4 4 \ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION â€¢ l hereby certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing the application I am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owners of the property. I In submitting the application materials and signing this application agreement, I acknowledge and agree that the application is subject to the applicable processing and public hearing requirements set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code (EVDC). â€¢ I acknowledge that I have obtained or have access to the EVDC, and that, prior to filing this application, I have had the opportunity to consult the relevant provisions governing the processing of and decision on the application. (The Estes Valley Development Code is available online at www.estesnet.com/ComDev/DevCode.) I I understand that acceptance of this application by the Town of Estes Park for filing and receipt of the application fee by the Town does not necessarily mean that the application is complete under the applicable requirements of the EVDC. â€¢ I understand that this proposal may be delayed in processing by a month or more if the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or submitted after the deadline date. â€¢ I understand that a resubmittal fee will be charged if my application is incomplete. â€¢ The Community Development Department will notify the applicant in writing of the date on which the application is determined to be complete. â€¢ I grant permission for Town of Estes Park Employees and Planning Commissioners with proper identification access to my property during the review of this application. â€¢ I acknowledge that I have received the Estes Valley Development Review Application Schedule and that failure to meet the deadlines shown on said schedule shall result in my application or the approval of my application becoming NULL and VOID. I understand that full fees will be charged for the resubmittal of an application that has become null and void. Names: Record Owner PLEASE PR/NT: YMCA OF THE R0CKIES Applicant PLEASE PRINT: MARK L. HOLDT, VICE PRESIDENT Signatures: Record Owner YMCA OF THE ROCKTES r RY: twtd 9-'*4* 9,4. ~ D-13-06 Applicant MARK L. HOLDT '*4 3-36#k Date lo-/7 *-06 Â· Â·Â· ' f.. r,lit U r.. '..' . 1,-N\:524 i., F 11 DEC 2 7 2006 ' I'./4 ) i A 1* ....J J 11 2 4 t Revised 10/13/06 7 /1 ./ 1 :' '. 1 Â£*Â·d .7 A ..1 U '12 , 1 \4 i ~1 r..1 -Â·t Â·=:li..,:.I-/IÂ·Â·Â·-'A=L: 1 1\' DEC 2 7 2006 9] hi ..j./ i 1 '--"/ i ;1 1 PE i/:21 / 11 4 4 L.= 2-C Ny'-5 -M E , Â« =r -5 . -== @ W - W , 6 40 1 -- c Q 32 vi e 58@1@9032:0'120 Ng %*1 4 m O el <+-' CO - M O M NOUR~UR 0 8 5 0 5 0 5 0 h 41 t- gal:EigAdg~gCd god 9 03 CE = co 04 - 0 -1 . 1$3141*1X Et @23@24 4= A.*AA--0-3 2~ 4 CO P A W E- ~ 41= i*Â·-/-1 '1 0 N 41 2 9 .0 UM 52 * < en List of Legal Descriptions-YMCA of the Rockies Assessor Parcel # ction 4 and SE 1/1 Section 5 puu g uo!logs Parcel Numbef Legal Dedcriptibn ' SECTION 4 Assessor Parcel # 4, NE w Section 4 5 NOLLOIS 34041-06-001 nce ofYMCA" Assessor Parcel # and 5 34042-00-022 34043-00-032 Assessor Parcel # n4 34044-00-064 Assessor Parcel # and 5 EZO-00-3*04Â£ # POTdlos)~90~~ \ 1. 11 le- -~-tÂ»-,rnt=-:-Â·&=-=Â·:-- h 2 98 DEC 2 7 20)6 b m c !:,1 12/ 1 Â·1 I -I ..1 â€¢ f . 4 , R. g-,Â· j 11 ' I. 4 4 rk, i gJ-'' I 0\ C ' A. 0 C = 4 . too - U A U . I' E I I E~Et-2121123 . b< Z J 32 3 2 20*2= â‚¬*â‚¬E .6 2 2 05 5- Â¥0 , , 3â‚¬-2 92 1 y 04 - A.i ~ 0-1 00 0.4 CO A A-= .14-= -145 .14.c > CO 32 W Ill W A 40 , *41'. 2 @ W.B~ w = e Â·% to 2 IO g b 0 W 0 Â§02#EME INRE . * '00 8/ 00 %* ig e: rs a: 49 8/ 43 82 i a: ts h -- . 32 oR ORU R , Bâ€¢51 - en t M O M u 1 M > en , 7 2 Eâ‚¬gâ‚¬gâ‚¬.6â‚¬. , I Â£4 : g K 9 04 2, e O % 0* 29 ' ERS E N ap .im Ep jm er 42 EF U 21 1 4#*551 *74 9* ~ 949 A CE- A E- A E--1 H E- ~9Â· A E- m. E- -1 E- -1 E- -1 E- -1 E- a E--1 4 E- A * , :% Cm :tt * * 4 8 00 8 u N + 1 201 000Â©ON O ,-1 0 =f Â¢ . -8 -0 .18 E 04 & 0 01Â©Coden . 1-1.-4 29Â£9 99900 ' 29/9 FLE/9 29Â£9 6. 0 64 0 00Â©60 y 29 19 9 99 9 9% L. =4 ** m 4 *4 ** m* *4 04, ON 0 U O 2 'Â·t O -O 0 h h h > FO-h - - d 64 M k Cri co - co 04 04 - 91- - M 2 en ~ m 0 ON U D =r e 4- 1 =t- I u ouou Â·=t- u=rotuxtÂ· u =r U =t- 0000 00000 , [/0 -$ . Fl 5 1 9 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 4 42. . 0 - rn :0 : 0:0:0 [40~90 9. M F ro r M m m m M Â·Â·-<A<X<X<X<Y~<X Â·2XÂ·2X 34091-00-001 all in NE 1/1, NE % Section 9 excepted from B.1336, P,97) ... 1 sessor Parcel #s Rockies in Section 4 and 9 92 - uoISIAFpqnS MoopOAO C uo!9!AwqnS ,IOOIJOAO (ZE-53 'ZE 8 I -5 r P reel # 14 Section 10 OI uorloos 17~ MN UOISIA!pqns # Poled UO!9!A!P UOISIAIP UOIS!AIP SECTION 9 Assessor Parcel # on of NE 1/4, NE 1/4 Se 39 'MEL-H'Nt ~00-013 r Ar C) W 1-hh 5:08-h LOA.-92! 91. 4- = 10 If) =001& 2 1 8 8 0 S~@~Â° w 25 ~ fg S 28 9&5ZTES*2 8&3622 8 d 0000- 0 N e N C\1 082588Â®amlos*85@282&0 :0*Roooe- m:mo,600 0 - 0 0 0 7 0 0 00 + t< (D Lo (D 00 4-2 E--2-Â£<<<Oifc/) .--=2004052.2-*LI.1.*-~*-9.20(Â»COOLIJAU.1 6 g.2 -2 16 &3 LE,536 ,-d~:2Â·H--foR39tm -Ze Â®O & 280<0 Azxz ~~ â‚¬ I (1) e Â® > 1.[:-262>_1'2 8 o E g B E g R -cf"3 0% a=Â£ 2 =2 -W 822 &- a @ *.60 90-8 cFQ- E U, 0. CL c*-@ cf i- 00(1)0:m.brow-2(1)coicorgw.cmw 2 C E C & M O Â·C G .12 W C Â¤) J - -E O -r C - O LULU CO LU O U) O U) 9 S LL O ~ < O U.1 m O LU J J LU U) M LU OIDIOIDJo.J . CO 58.2-62@2 5 C O -a C =68 0 0 .h o ff U . - ai WNE=~~ 21-= CD CO U -760_ EME_ 2 2 8 j& 4 61 2 ,. o o o g E e N LD .Â¤ LO Â£ B E .C ,~ * 8% â‚¬&5.2.Â§*M% %3 2 2& 2 82&02% &% ai,~05#ZED e E-~res 2 * m Z 2 00 7% x *052 .& E.v E 2 Â¤ N E * 5 8 & LO U) ~ CO [Â¤ , M u., . mu) U) q. oc/) . 8 2-= 1.- Rom tru) COED g ooo 86 COLLI Â£ m-le 2 48@444 2 9 0 O O Al LO CD LO O h Lr) h - LO r O 09 0 r- 1 0 0 CO O Â©WiggENMMEA rwolow . 4- tO 1 00) 9- 00 O LO Â· CO CO Â· Â· p O Â·OCD-LN O 00 h 4- 0 00 40-(\19-0-0-0-4-0. - C\1 91- 0- C\1 00 09 (D CD O- N ,- r - ID 00 CO 00 0- h - 0- 0- 10 - C 3- (D a. â‚¬ N E (D Q 0 E 0 $ 0-9 8 0 2 1* 5 2 92- ff,g f~ -~ ~ ~ ~w~wL~ ~ -2 2 -2 â‚¬ a h g O coe :3 2 U.â‚¬â‚¬-- to 2-08*-oje~-oc m or Ea @AJ ~ILL % mEZgÂ®%%80EOGo leam (D (D .c 9 LL c L Z "92.-0 %.00000 (10 (D E m Co co . CE O 6 2.-M<# AC)gO O @&!co .:(Do oo- (D 0 0 â€¢ C 6- (D (D 02 0 DC 8 E r >Â·-hez Em m %'02 coN@18-00-2'(G2 8 Ed â‚¬ 3 2 0 W 41 5 5 Z E C J Â£ CO W CO (0 (0 m (00 - CO m (0 $ 0 2 0 m - 0 L -k = I I(00. <CO 0 -,m -I LLI il *MEO I ~0 0 1 6(90 -99% 88 00(30-=mliES=lk 25 BE 299 selED S!/Ael UIAeN Corrine Albers Bss 20490 80511 49085 C/O Craig Bigler 80517 KS 66217 aren L. Davis 80517 9326 LOLt,6 )10!J:1 ejeqied 0 L6O8 al/\I '5uuds JeAI!S 11!H euuel.IW>1 anza Blvd Ikhorn, NE Estes Par Estes Estes Park, C Estes Par Jed salsE *] els!A 46!H L814 MeueH epu ZZ Xl 'uoisnoH peeH lauer Ave. 309 Bellatti vood Dr. H%32[rge Cir 10 uo!.uilllOG ueld JelseIN VOINA Virginia Colby Owner Owner 11 UMOJe UUÂ¥ O/0 OS Meliews pue XeM pJOISS David and Jane A Bu hnell Allen and Patty Ann Dolezal C r 6-5 E 0, El.m E A h 00 O=0 0 8@ 90Eg 20*~LOCV 0 Sm N 8 9 x W<800 00 00 Lr) 00 00 (V 00 00 1.0 1-- 20 8 0 0 ~0 0000 mO0969 8 Â°Â°~@858 R*2 20< 91 0 -9 0 6 2 0 8 8~ows gk I~qo r 1-U .2 ~ ' n Cd. ~ 22=â‚¬22â‚¬Câ‚¬Mf#g F> ti8**ixz mxglEE 0 (6 73 .62 - E CO 9 4 0 3 0 22 ~:E 8 2 2 En. 92 z c -"Â£ 01- 8.0-1-~ 0- E O 0-22 % 0 12 1-2'22@*< co .92 0 o cd --22 cd c,~ ~g.f gi 0:00** 47 0 N (1) U) a..3 c .99 - :g 39 .5 :9 E 6.2 2 0 u-22(D 00 J I EM8&32wzu~ jo~ ~ ~ 32MMC@8225 4 2~ ~o 63~ wi 31~ ww #E# m -5 6- .- R 0 C 0 C 23~~~p~-525 ~ %P - Av~A 6 am B~ 228% Cot-5 v >. 0 - Z â‚¬ d @ % %1 92 1= i -S E-~ F iii j E i 040 :O-180*>ELLIO 7 .02Â®waÂ©*883*213%532~~mes:e>:Â®~ O C) 03 09 0) 'A r- 0- Â· 4 > 31 5 2 2 R J LO N -Â· 6 - cy M - cy # e O Â· 0 tO 1.0 O O C) O 00 9- 1.0 < - C\1 C) CU * CD Cy - Cr) 00 r O- CO h W N 00 N O) CD O. O- 10 0.- C\1 O. C) C\1 - 00 ,- N W N N N C\1 0 C\1 If) g %6 N.-5 20- O E 8 e -1 I C - C 3 2 -O CO 11 C G O m 9 .52 6 r .c 2 Eno *O U. 5 <m 0 Â£ 0 r - m d -5 Z &3 2, OME 2 g i o 0 22 : 0 1 2 -2 E fifff i , ,~ 5.,Ye 91 N E 2 g -2 0 v, 2 0 CD >af 16 C U. 2 2| O C 1 2 - E 2 -2 ~ g st : Â§= -ob:C 4,0 5Â§%~@ Â§%fÂ§3~*2 ~~~0~2 2 - 0 12 0 2- I 1 1 b 0 0 -0 5;E E (D c ' u C (D 1-0(1)-2-0Â®@ER,EvE=CD'112/vg ~ .-#~51~ 3%~2 692@t@318 %3Â§?2 mY #ti %8% 25 82@00 c . L. 2%8 6- 0 , O 00 a. -100< 0 00-0 (DI~(000,.O18O8ORN Â®00.--,0221.ug (D 2Â£ C CO C 0 GED % 0 CO [0 - 0-r,I C (1) ==-1* =28 ~=2 I -, wE coM:Â§ A-EN *2 *,2 g ~ 28 @504.co m EN E ZZ 0 2 -O (0.E 0 A M : S E Ir (O 0 9 2 E-H-@Â®My g.ceÂ·2 .cji %20002Â·@a,EE.8 g ~ CO -5 g O CO 430@de 3238%22%@%2321142AjEFFE38aommiMio~oam),924Sd5 elvedere Tiburon, CA 945 ~nh a 60525 8EZZ 41!UIS 4#eg uell3 thleen Hines ek Overlook Noblesville, IN 46060 Johnston oveland, CO 80538 CO 80537 o io, TX 78209 es Par 0517 6002 ZLGO LLSO O 80237 J. Lehmkuel stes Park, CO 80511 c. Holdt Lincoln, NE 68527 D umble, TX 77339 Owner Owner 11 City, State, Zip 90014 10'ei'!Asel]JE ~JG MOB Ple!Pauns elle40!IN pue JOAell 90ZA>ld Xew inq! Rott~ns hwestern Blvd E. Mercer PI ueld JeweIN VOINA Alice Sm ith Diane Krotter u46neA :NllÂ¥ >peel leuO! le levy UUÂ¥ eilleN Robe h * CoED W 2! *@@~80-88 8.0--9~ g Â§2 O 00 00 00 0 0000 00 00 20) 2 2 22 0 0 00000 2'0 00052<28Â°Mok o 8-0000Â·& 0000-> 00-,ho 2022 â‚¬ 0 2-72-2,2- 5 -2 t 1 E f 52 12 @ 0 & te cO O m m ([1 CO a) CL 40- al 0- -0 0- 0- 0-0-*a)- - u, 2 0 0 0 0 - 2 t; tz 0E1EE5~3~%5EEiÂ¥i ~m r I CD J J O 0 0 C m 0 -5 260292-59 2%li%2% I U) W If) Â· - 10 1.0 r-Â· C\1 1.0 0 ,- LO CU 9- cD 0 00 1 00 9- 0 00 O (D O C\1 (\1 (D N 00 O Â· 1 10000 0 IDCU C) 128 tB a. 14 M N cy o. N cy v - cy 09 - 0 0- Cy e a C (0 E * O *tz P (D O 2 C Z 00 ~ 45 ~. ~ 5 C D 0) 0 C 2% C O Z I E EL 3 0151Â£<<N E 22 0 O 2 62%=2 B EmE'Cw= o ~ai oca *00>*-0ujluiv ~ ~ i 2 , z R g *%d~NEÂ®@E (D C C Ecl? -1 C - 0 E C (11 (DLL > (0 0 3.6 9- 32 c TB c g .2 Â£ =3 8 E Z m 46 2 C J m .0 co * -5 5 E m- ~ co,-~1-0=50=5<*tEm~Sm>-shÂ£*3 ,- iftcurrent Lodge, Inc. ighway 66 80517 0517 318 Aspen Brook D Estes 80517 O. Box 20635 Estes 80517 United S es of America Rocky Mountain National Park ~3eln1er~I~~eg~~Ave ZED ,[IC 200~90 Owner Owner 11 Address ity, State, Zip Tiemeyer 01 Aileen B t s Park, 8 David aine Wynegar 3115 Acorn Wood Way , X 77059 d Danial Williams Aurora, CO P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 1 un~I~~d. th Webb ud Ave 305 Wehrman reen Ct SE 5 Goodfellow Ln OE.I~*(Dir C/O Wade Whilden 000 One Shell Pia ueld JeweIN VOINA uesue6Jor illiams, JR. C/O Pamela Russo the Unveiled God PMB 254 eo!]elllÂ¥ to sel S pel!un Waters r a Taylor .GE, F P #44: 4.r~/13..144214.'lli- i <---Â£:-- Ir. ~ , 1... 6 f.-- . '79 4.-4,-1 - tr sair.vt f 0 1 0 '. 94 '9. ..10 .4 i ... .eâ€¢ n 31'04 1 - 1,/' ErÂ·Dj - 1 1.lir4 . P 6 A 6-c-31 E 54:=. 9 f> ''rle-4 /-, 4. S , 775 b 1-1, D, i. 4 4. 1 .3. I 'pjal/1&* I ' ..... ..1 .al.r . r. 1. t~.- _ +c LEI -i i ..._.---3 .. 4 44- fi, Coli :'=11 41.3 Ff 13'.A J ~ lierilll :,/, 9 Itt . 1/ 4. t. 1 ./ ' .- 1 ., 1 'V J.,1 0 7 4 -1 1 4 f 1 1 1 14 1 4 . â‚¬ I â‚¬ h Â·1-.d , 1 9 E .12 1% I 4 , . i-- 4 . S:* 'Sh - 1 1 -. . 4 0 4 ' j' 7 //// 1~~ ~ ' t~i t . , '4 j h *tt .1 ..42Â¥ . 4- EJÂ· ./ .. - :444' ' IW ' "3 . . 440 1 1.. 1 9.. -,ir '1 , ... 0 1 /2 /////B-~~ 0 ' 1/'4 1,# + /1",9 NE C t parj/1 :NJ 4; .1 -4 21 .U, I 2, 214â€¢ -E =- K.2 . ' ill Wil. 4/ 1- * # &6* ..=0 1//gui '0 . . I. . I- i Â· I' 41 - 6- Alf 41 $: 0 . i.* ). 6 d. i,i. 4 1 10 6 . 6 3 , 75*/ 1/7 . - -. 41 4,1 a 1 141*. a 494*r, 4 -,8 il ' 1,?, â€¢1440#r 0 â‚¬- . :1 3 - 4 7 9 . ...1 ./.4 i i .1 . 1 m.-- 1 0 " 1 r. 7' .i 4, t R ~~ . 4 .... 4:~ 2 I 1- *f -9., 'Â£ 30. . , . 7 -11 1 .4/ ./ %1 - I. .-I. J - 9- 9 * . .../21 ... 1,4 b , F,- Ap ill--41,â€¢I # 1, - 9 -11Â» * I: 1 1 -/ 6,1 . lid 7 - 1.3 4 1 \-9 -4-4 1-- ill - j.'tl ' t , B...:.1.1 <Tr'~ A 1.--....- .1 1 6 -41 M'~ PL'/1 V 1 4 . 1 3./11.ViA ! ...i /9 f" t I .Ull , i 4 1 .19'rl. - . i E.* '- 11-I'll.JIA.6.1 r . . 1. . f ... 1. C lf' d +4</3/ ~773 V. 9*- 3/%4 dÂ¥* - VF vr-7 0 if r. . 4-it 0 M. 'f~.411~i 3, '32/1:;: . .J. .. ': t. U -.., ' . I , i < f . 7 4,r 4- ..r-- O UJ 91 - 9002 jequleldes 4 ~., U ....t.. 4,2 ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN -Iktr<. of the Rockies 0!Pnls , s 1001!40.Iv 041 . 1 . . .. . .. I . - .. ... , 493'lek-4332 *P 1 1 i J<& A - -4.- hir e.. ... ... L - - JIN"23/&./4/-.. . ..-- /1-65 - I .R 0- '7* .441.4 34 1 'hA. r ..1.9 .r.,h ..'. .... - 1- :*97 i- PIJJ~- 6 - - LÂ· I . . ... - . S ..t /3/A , A ..4. - . 'SU IM.,im. - 1 J E.* . K> 051 - I- 4 =Â£01. -il- 14 0 AL. . / 4 - ... *C I 4 / I. r -. P. f. I . t .-9 . +LFEr A- & .-4 -Â·f . ...A U A ' Â£ 1 I ..1/ r . I . -lk . 93/1- . '70 LU 1 -t , ;42 7 *I - /3. I. , , .1, & :.1 t 9- , pr IA D . D U =O S IO 14 2 Â£ a) C 4-C- -Â¤ US .8- 0 0 0 1 2 c - A (D c v - 1 -0 0 0 (1) 0 0 c .2 m 6 3 E -Â¤15 C J 0- > L U) 0 -C 0 3 N 2 2 E O 0 0 g=02 0 E-Eâ€¢-0 - ,_ CO E 2 0 y .E E * CE 0 8 92 16 E -2 1 0 8 .9 m CE a Â¤) Si (0 0 OC efwu.88,2 E f 2 2Â£ E Z 92 ~* Egia m Â·- 0 2 Z E o 8 2 2 5 @ E L m o ve 2 Â®pcm(D E Eg~~ 0 % 5 1 0 (D= 0 0Â¤,WEE- 0- 0 51= =co ro m m E *4 H * c A-< O C r -C 3 3 0 2 m Â§%2 m 1% 3 1 16-2 2 t32 #i da 2-01=E 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 (OE> 92 (O -- . 1 - ip Â·3 &8 0~28 ZZ -U) 2, O 8.0 -E $1) Ca) E (1'On. O i @83 g.5.. 0 m (D m CE c 0 9 1- (0 3 a) JO a) O. 28 c M .C 03 B C m.*b BEO Ed) (D 0 0 14 (D .2 a. ..c & 28 5 2 8 Â£ Â£ 8 eo .2 * 2 2 -C O 2 C E R ~ 0 gy fgbic O w ,; (1) Bavg38 a) a) m 2 N 28 . Fam - < oct o 25 220 5 0 2 4 2 0 1-2 229<w c Â® (0 m 2 m a) CD =O wc > m C a G) cE v.- (D b M = o O 0 -05 -- 2 0 M 0 L~(OC-(0 2 a 2 -!2 - E w 1 -2- â‚¬ E k * U) 1- 0 6- (D (D a)-0 1 2 m w 9 4- * a) A * *16:f;+8 Ng.T.~Â®2_ 0 u- Noao.rec1~f2012 ,- ~- .9 E E .2.- U,H1OÂ¤-U) # > -0 .22 * 6.- c 000000 1-(00 L .- w m 02:-Â¤00.-Â¤ E arÂ£ a) m i 0,23 (D Â·-00- -92 u, 0 =Â·625=Iv-EE M e 12 Y â‚¬ f '2 2 g $ 2 .sg " 22 - 16 f 1 1 i C ZE m.Â¤ c . E >. t= S - E abu) 8 0 0 ~~2~~~a .,Â§ & 02 -@ a. 8~~ L .- : 22 Â¥ ' & 42 -- 2 2 2 ~ ~ E:Eu-ZE 2 g Â§ 2. Ea) g 3*Et <bi -cz E - 0 4 E E ./ 00 Â·M E -22 . FL Fr z Jf in 11 0 = L 71 m - Â·58=62Â°~ a) a) 5 22 4, m 2 & %.2 k 9 0, 5 -0 .= v 2 0.0.24 > L O 6- C) O m : 16 -0 E -OZ m b *@E Ec E# 0 0 2 g -5 o 2 ~ iii tilt H i . e M.2 9 E ~ g k E a) C ac - .C O E .9 1 73 R 2 3 .m 222- E Saa $ fvc 2 0 C>0 - 038,6 m b E 8 2 0-'Qu~E -go Ch 1 .9 = 2 N - C :g m 2242 5 82)*--~80 0 - m Mâ‚¬=2 NEd 12 a) CE Q - --- ./ * m (0 - O C 0 {0.6 .5 E m (0 2 z < 2 2 a, 6 > 110*92 ~~ =F r 1- )0 -00(00 - Z %2 *E %5 2 Ec ui 62 45 81 y WS % C E g b :Ree &00 / 1 oÂ· 9Â·&2 66% tf <251 0 0 3; 0, ap .= -= r . 0 ~D ~S v Q.'E w - A 0) 4) C CJ 4-0 m (D v C - Co N c 4- o U) c a) -- 16 m E -24 (0 0 (0 C L > C 0 2 C â€¢ . 5 (020 r r = . p >t e#1-0 f >253@>>2 TELE~am~ ~+ if ~~ cosazsd@ ' 2Â£,a)60 . 7:/.,2.1 ......4 - , V f.4 4 1 70 - 4 â€¢ I *... I. l 'e . -, , - i . i,At. f 2 ' 0 ./ . i' d . 6. ..2 k I tr.I . .. T k . 4 , 6 '1 .1,0 41 . .f=; V + , 2- - ':. 1 - ..11 7 r.' . 40 ' 1 ,. + 3.4 1 <4 0% .,e. A i . 17. I . 14 11 . 15, , 1 -1 E~ 8 , --- r . ..1 L - 1 - -12Â£& 4 -t 4 t 1 1 4. 4 .r I t , + 11 : .'7 . \ ..1, :. 4 V L # .. 103 Â· 11.33 .a . /4 6.1 .* Ally =Ii . I Al/~4<2 * ill 3= 11~1 - 7/I'll - * u : It . . lij va Â£ i . 1 33% 0 :41 ~ . 4 r.1. . 7 ' I// t... 6 JU. 2 .; 4. tr 1*rk r Z #11/119 1 1.'. 1 0 7 4 --01 4 A.7 . 4. .4 5.â‚¬ t 1 , ....Allial' i n P 1 ' A. . 1 3 .2 m -77 -2 2 - 7 29: I .3 ilig' YMCA of the Rockies organiz 100th students and international students i king a comprehensive p rocess ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN PeiseoeJO, 6uipnpul 'ueld Jelselll 'saoimes pue sisenB u! 41'~016 pele en6 009 ueld sseuisnq Meu v ; fojd le j p e 'Sluell]113Op uueid ese41 40ee 6 eAe 1 Joi lepow 6uiuueld Pejeifi el ! All J e eleeio ol SJOUSIA JO SU g families and str te the Asso oric an operates two year-round ference e Association. Master Plan rces; and a draft list f I ow eqi Jo p d se jual.unoo e uis!Aej Uel# Ap luel.UeAOLU le Il mark the 100 Ca ital F ojects Plan e41 poddns die4 a hospitality services certification velop a long-te of the Rockies serves conferences, family ning model: ped n Se embe eAe4 suogepu Mission and gejuao alll Jo ejnlnl ==3121==Pul INTRODUCTION STATEMEN anniv The Overall L r facilities. Business edo :se!69 le]1 4}AAO16 peled Rockies is a nonprofit organization conferen in the United States, the ated pue sell I e eoue e JOJ UO!S!A SJOp@Jip luie.4 se Ranch, nea P Colora DUCTION ters: Estes Park Cen camp located at Snow Mountain Ranch. me and seasonal staff work at bo Mount e oe 88 ses!]dul o eu chase 909 as staff members include senior reti e unions, re 2,1 9 YMCA of the Rookie - ly=â€¢P= - r - *I~ I ... r I ..... t I .......6 f =12- : 2, , + 1 ... -2- . - ast- - . 4 l j. 0 . 10- I ~4 1 - *f 4 21: 3.9, . 2 0 1 -. 1 1 11 - 4.1 Â· , , .; E . Ai.' , 0 1 T -66Â»'.... --.. . . i ...4 6 @ , , 1 '4 1~ -- . e I - . 42 -b.Â·= 1 1- -C. t.k t., ' 4' r ~4-t - 7 02 1 IJ' --- '3 ' f 13 e ~r! f A 5 22,1- 11 ZE ' '1 4 1 -11-41,2/ ..il lisil . 1 , , I. 41. re f ' 0 4 . - . 1 = 4 37, r., r j $, ./ : 1 : illitia 21 -t I ---- 1 .3/13/3 -i ~~litil - . 6.-r - , 0 . - 1, 1, ''' F 4 , e ' 2 ext .1 01- 1/5/5/14 31 litttill - - . * ft it..41 - th .~ . .' 2-./4.- z 61%3iN . . 111: drill 0 #/1 /111:1 402*211*#li -ail i.'Sil 0 us.bti-:.Â·1 c - â€¢~ "~~ ~le > Â£ Â§ 51 4===1 4.- . 2 - ' B 2 0 p ac . a. , 2 - -8 1 C Ba m b - :T 01* 1 -i i El a (D 1 -al A la 11 1 21 8 - 4.NFLH Z - 2 1*., - ..>=74 0 -C 0 - - - 0 4 0 Ul = 0 9 -E 2 2 -B Â¤~ E 0 0 -C 0 9- 8 & & 0).S .Â§ 1 C (D 0 2 N 3 F 6 73 2.5 71 t- & DE R & i. 1: iii & 3 15 (D .- (D -Â¤ E 5 12 1/ it : c~ 3 ~ Â£ i ~ pq m (D 5 00 c - ro m - -02 0- -7.-,9 1.21224.. 0 2 m > 16 2 #CD.0 ~ f @ 2 2 0- 16 14.42 gL g %~ m 0 -~ ,~0:Â·tÂ· 9 O U) ..in.~22 - : 1-3 f=- 1 , 9 O C W M LI_ 0 b 32 = v .5 == CDS 18 (0-acn 09 ~~ $ 3 lE .7 E % .Â¥4 k *B f Ng EN & P 42 *- 1% mt 5 4# 9% 8.E J (2 2-3, m m < 7 E --2 0 E E E , W,- 2 7 92- â‚¬ 0 3 5 0 9 8 2 1 & 95 g 4.-9-L- 99 -1 , -+92 r,% 2 03 U) >k :E 22 13 -C o &3 2 15 8 329-1.- - 2@ 3 co 2.-2 â‚¬ #2 E % 2, * ~ &2â‚¬ g /7. v 52 -c 2 0 ..Â· Â· 9 5% * 1- .@19Â¤..53.02(OB ~~Rbluu, e -*5 6 --- 3 1 =-2 12-in al O 0 2 0&5*E CO .0 U) 0 = 0 >3*8 a) U) O 2 2 22*4*,ip@ :*BJCE E 2 2 2- 5 e Â·~ 2 m ~co u ~ ~ iii .2 (D - 0 0 0 0 Â£ 1 ac 0 5 % $ O 0 EE a ~ .1 Ega,gf"42 0'2220 A 50@G?8~ Â·,2 4; 5 0 % 19 9 5 4 0 m -6 2 c) 8, S J ro w .g~ CO .05 2 2 u) 2, , RE Z * e 2 1 5 *5 2 2 2 2 Â·2 0 -1 2 u, 12 82 32 19 k % 23221Â§2-2EPEÂ®~ 0.= =8*Â¥2%42&%8 mu 2 ,a- Â£ 0 -Â¤ a * 9 5 8 -s Â© 1 8 b M 8 0 < 1 t , -Â¤ m o v m. . . ... 0 40 .O 0 0 00 5 4 2 R g v 15. ~,0- - -/4 1 ., C Â®Â®5 2 x c _ a_ s < c 3 2 E E &3 + 5 0 058 ~ 2 2 5 8BNZE c E 0.6 * Â® 2 16 -2 b b E. F Â·0 0 9 8,2 38@3@3 5 22 (D 0 00- 9 Z U) 7 v 13 22* 2 %~ .-6 C .b: CD - C ( CL F - C WO 2 U' ~6 (D (1) 4- 0 0 -0 0 JC au & UU m .Â¤ ro 0 ~ 2 $ Di N 553 22 2 2 73- 6. 61 8-i E .2 12*9 ; N E 2 Â£=Â£ ~ -f E i 3 i* S 2 4, w E v- 181: 5 E 8.g.E c 7 2 A mEE .=4 3 as :20 2 2 O C w ro 12 = 0 2 -2 -0 E- m g D (Do 20 2.fE .c & 8 iN C W p (1) O -C (1) 4 ~ m 2 8 c .-02>000* 16 0 0 6.91 2, E P Â·2 O co (1) 03 n m m th N E RE R g d - 22 1 0 LLI a) E *242 8-2' 6 0 0 2 -O 5%11#111!11 zie fibillf Â· C A C 6- (1) m U) m..0 - < 1- 15==:.2 .I C 0 ..8 16- #% 3 E Z Er Cl 7 296:.9 0 0 0 - W (D - C 0 m (1) C 0 0 .229-4.. n megi,5011(03 M E 0- .._ m te a W U) 0-0 (2-71 022 c g, m c o 2 2 Â·g .EE = 0 L Z O M C a b C - . :9:2 + > m < E +r P .0 iii g v w CE ..2 0 2 2 $ 2 5 -2 9 16 11 5 -8 m >Â· 31 2 -b R ~2 -S U) 11 v >06* (1) c (1) U ED (D '3 a, (1) (1) g m H- mo oo co a, E-Â¤ o co Ew=Â£2 m co <122Â£2 o m>*:Â£2-9-0-Â¤E mEss<-6 .' Aâ€¢; r. IM~Â· t'[1:a )9 . ~~~ os'P pue sei pe; pue m pepueju! s! ueld Jeise 3 23 Ft ESTES PARK C NTER MASTER PLAN f the project's benefit or impact to the election of t m led by EDAW A meeting to review coun survey proces nd schedule. to be tested ng was te features enters its second century, rtunities, c inventory of VE Jaclopo Included wer : u!}slxe 3 01 pepnpuoo IA pue SenleA 0300 Uols HAI se!MO ter has been very successful, but growth 1.2 MASTER PLAN PRO E ber 2005 ection orksho s! OILUOUOOe :SeJ < uolle ue ue s e inisseoons 6uoi s,jejueo elliuo 6 project specific, with little analysis and ust 2005 npnnse.~Jul ell vidual M CA of the Rockies have been strong visions here is a critical need overall vision and uoseei 6ullieduloo e s! spefold pesodoid Xuew e '9001 2 u! 6uiliels ed 41UOLU-Z L pe~~322! d elopment throughout its history have ueld Jelsel.U e e sep!Aoid ueld s!41 'Jeweo M JeAO jueludoleAep pue LIJAAO36 01 >IJOAAellle Slue 603 I nne o toric lack of overa 11 planning and the imme -SjuelueAoidiu! Joi se!1!un A el# pue 'e1!s e41 Jo se!}!lenb 0!ue ons, thought-out project plans, as uses due to need evenue G u *queP! Il!/n U s eo inisseoons puooes sj! mui -suoileiedo pue jueludoleA I define developm ueld Jeiselu s!41 eiseIN ls J 041 slueseide, U 74 7 11- 7 1 Z lie >*% , <> 4 0 3 49 6*Na 4 u g.i:, . - 93.-- 00 12 2 11 1 11! 1 11 / 4 '. 9 <~9 -. ...4 ... 21. %, ./ t. e Filli 4. 4 . . .1 1. 2. LJ r ~ 0.:4 - 1 e \Vilâ€¢ 1 0 , 4- i loiS- 1 1.....3 - leo - ' UFS-Bi> /-7 .'-7.1 11 ''' 0 'nouÂ¢ Z >- 1 : '10(Jig:\ 97 6 0 . c_. - *4 '11 . lee /7 0 2 i N , r#4.7, 4-4 Cl f EÂ°Â°, 11.*:1 ki 60 *O:; Â° .:441.4 404.43----- 6* . 4~~ \ 1 y .3,Â· 8.0. n 0 0 ' ife 9 !1 11 f & elli C /, lilli =--- tel 3 . <1 I - 1. c!'911Â£Â· 4,11!11]}11 6,20@Â£101001 1-1 '11 . 4- j , , . A 1. t + 4 18?V W 1 @rt . - Â· ' r~ 3 4, -r 1, 'I/ 4 -00 + 0 e r- ./ . 'L 1.7 Â¥ 1 :mia* v * 3 -- * i!. 2-2,-28< . 11 / ~ irpÂ·- Â¢ A E' 1 2#.(1Â¥ iN, i.(I'ilii *11 .r, k k . N .. :: 1, 1 . 4 111...,Uj/%' ~\ Â·At h.~) ZE 0 42/2 . t, .. \6 ., 1. h h hy'll .ip. 2.0 11! / -- Â· -m lili j )21 I.- 9 1 .1- / .3 Â¥ 2 â€¢ -1/#1// 1, ' a - + I. 4 11 j m, 1~Â· Jjy - 4. 7 .... 9 *.1 I . F:d 94, 3. 1 . -.\ ~f? Le Â« 14 . 11 > E I.F. .... 2.. 5 . 0 *1!1'-'7 1 / 1., i.4,6 .E .. 8 C - %1 2 = 0 ' â€¢ - 111 01 j /, O Cr I 'Rl 2 .. t1 1 limit y :03 4 *@Â©9 , i i ittit 1 1; i _ 31}11 ji~ 1 : 2 0 . @N ill... 1 34 16 91 : 2 Ft - Â£ *61k 'h. C 0 3 % g 6 8 6 8 N. 2 0 9 0 N O d) A 8 2 .0 - S 2 % 8 0 00 OE ES:24) E.h' G ulac on- o 0-0 Z 00 ~la Ng 0.98 0 9 01.- .C . ... . ... . 9 >Im 0 0 m 0, Zo 00 90 16 0 10 946 42 3,42 CA of the Rockies ESTES PARK CE ER MASTER P onceptual Planning Alternatives 041 6 -::21/ Alternative B - Revised Preferred Concept 1 t. id 00 eoeds uado pue slieji Alternative Concept Site Plan Development Â· Alternative Concept Site Plan Workshop Concept Site Plans. Development t plan alternatives were further e~~~kshop One. A 2-day workshop Id December 7 and 8. Included: Long-Range Planning Process Review Site Planning Process Overview ientation Walk-Through Analysis, Opportunities and Constraints nceptual Planning Alternatives Site Tour to Field Review the Alternati ueld Jelsevy Ue]D eA'leuiejlv per jueludoleAea pue uoiloel -ueld Jelsevy al!9 Ueia ell; Jo jueludoleAKI Jejse,\1 eNS Ueia -oal doqs)poM eo Mal/\eJ pUB UO!1elue JelselAI leu!=I .do4s>IJoM siope]!a .uogdope pue leAOidde 'AAe!AeJ Ueld tation 90OZ ., 4 I + % e * 1 4 Â· P L, et h 4 -' ~*-1 k, f :-- 4 I , i.,r. O V 3 03 2.2 - 0 2 , Â£~ 0 G, 1 1 E i 2 2 -0 - O a) E ... . :@7 7 (0 2 22- 2, &2 E 34 f:gif 2 2 Y.. . -1. E a 8 -0 0 0 0 2 0 0 16 -O. 06 (1) 0) 2 0 0 0 2 m Sâ‚¬â‚¬ % 2 (D (0 (0 02 -0 - - 0 2 2 16 00= E 2 2 E 0 4,8 -- co .9 2 .23 lit C 2 (0 a) 2 . ~-- 50 Ji 0-12 0=E m c 20 O . C .2 01 Ey-~a 0 51 ir i fe li TE -5 3 N le % .2 J~ $ Â° Ic, Ow > a,0 RE' 22 * g ~ CC O - Â¤) 4- E 41 -- 73 a. q) E m & 5 S 0 22 3 12-*E,&5-m@2& i~ ~ Nic-& 2% * Ei% -7*19 6 - 0 Â® 0.5 c w ME a ~'~ ai ~ =c d. ~ -t - I. i - 0 16 E >E ao ,Â·iÂ·:3 r tf ~ R~12 E R .Â£ ~ gE 5*u, 2 7 -Z -2 0 a, Â¥ 2 - ~ S :8 % 0 2=11- ca) 2 C '-Â® cg 252'@ 2 0 -= 3 -0 qi (o *Eg oa, E # 02Â·2 2.E ~2 Â£ ru a. & 2 ,N 9-12 -e Z. 1 +0 - i -2 1 13 -2 -2 E y 2 1 34 2 4- il M 003 0.9 02 800=-2 ~ 1 2 % 5 W &3 2 % 5 8 * 0-% & la -2:2 :% (1) 2 12 Â® (1) 22 2 -3; 8 2 c, % E Z (D 0 -BO '5 - 0 (1) (om Jro JL= O (1)- 71 -'J -w 0 5 MEAU)>coe.E[Â£0200=OvetimmED-malutma u.1 GE 5 0 isg Co = 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 m . O 9 -5 2.9 0 .0.. R r Â· /' 0 -5 2 2 E 0 2 E 2 ... 2 2~ 2 ~ (1) g Â§ 'Â§ U) M .iii u) E 0 -Â¤ .a. 12 - - c .104*62 . . 8%3 * 0Â¥~Egii . -- 0 9 -33 E 3 f J 9E 2 DEC . -- 0 A -- 14) 623 O - O . 0 1 6 NE W B 2.0 2% k ..2 5 8 E Ngc-06- ~ ~ f E 1% 3 22 2 2 3 0 0 2 .1 3 5 f 41 i S 9 3 -32 ki Im *Â·% b - :2 0 ,4 - - Ji - Â£ -8 -E R Â£ '19 C.<1 5 fi M 0.2 / 0 ;Ecu~o, 2 1%23 <28 62 ~ 8%;m = Â£ 1- m o )6 #- 8 2 4- g ' --- - - Ce il (1 Â§ g :3-'8' 1- M E i; 0 12 & ~ 2 ~:~7 L. Eva) 0 ' O OUâ‚¬(1) I 2 5% 4) m . , \ 0 . O ~ (1) 1- ~ : iii i f f E W ~i G . r --. 7 CE v 2' J - 0 9- 82 0 2 1. 3 C C C- m ON Q - 1 O ZE - 9 ~ .M LL 25 Â»O O 0 0 0 1-~.w.--00 0 0%#21% C ,~ 9 CD Â·- -a) . E ip H i 'll i f ., W O 0 O -C - 2. 4 9 c E --- - 0 0 (0 4, U) v -5 E - . - I 1 5.. afor,- 5 & 4 0 - O . (Ii & . 2 - ..----4 -1 - lu f i > :0 0=-2 2 2 x =NE ME 0% 95~Â§ 8 10 ~I Â£ i dE f. li k g' 2 Â» 31, -a 22-a> _ co O = CC U) C - 0 I -C 0 2 Ic (D -C 0 2 2 O 0 - O 9 0 (D (D 0pal - .C > (1) O 2 0 C 1- 0 5 W I- 11 1# 1; 2 ar E ro C 0 - v (0 0 0 0 C L N E m -11- 4,~w . : 4 8 & :% 2 (1) 5 g) CD 1-0 H W. 12 3 OX O . coocc m.g=*= ~2 Cv roc- (0 a U) -* 0 0 > m - N m w J J m O 00 0 - 4 0 m- O a) grig Â§3 2 (0 U) 0 - 2 ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN the Rockies dolls)POM BUILULUe.160Jd uo!10eloJd lejuel.UUOJ!Alle 'Seluo elu ino ol se!pedoid ino puo pue sXoq JOJ seoueped Slue eAU! UO 41AAOJ6 enue 2. MASTER PLAN GOALS AND MCA of the and Goals for the Estes Park mu ation o the ma n. The master plan s Mission, Vision and Core success. others, to be sen vision oal statements were and added to i e workshops. They were utilized in the ry of the Center. jueweBeuevy pue u! seSue40 01 idepe 01 4!pq seoueuedxe puedxe pue 4!SJeA!p puedxe diall ol suosees Jepino vision for the future. These have recently been Center for the next others, to help ot ing workshop, reviewed sive to future ma mo ies. ell,36euelu le}Ual.UUO]!Alle JO 6uldweo Je luwns leuoilipen self, to love ent r Ma ter mon to eration for th ill people and for God's 00 04AA lie JO SeA se!1!UleJ Joi se o Jedxe Bu!4!un ep:Aoid 01 to be a seek 0 1, eqi lo VOMIA 1 uoileonpe 'snoi611eJ CA OF THE ROCKIES MISSION AND VISION FOR THE The YMCA f the Rockies is a unique Christian association th a very specific mission, core values d confirmed during development of the he Rockies Mission is: nd are listed below Rockies M ssion 41Alpv duteo Xea 9%M% 41 If 19: - . E - -2.t= p - .I 2 L ,=4- 4.. J- -- iR- 5- Al -- , (D CD .4. 8 2 .E Â£ 2 IM' i E m Y 0 2 -; Â·31 (D 3@3 1 % 2 0 16 E 3*29:z a 0 19 & (0 E IE E -cc w E -...7- y r C OC 2 2 g F 3 2 I â‚¬ 5 1 2 -r :1 024 F 2.m m c-[3 0~46 9 00 # Â·5 2 :- o (D -9 = 2 1 -2:2 19 p E S,%% 22 5 02 0 0 8 m 2 11 - 2-1 Â£ 8 0 M 2 Â¢0 0 5 5 0 4 CD 0 4 E Rui c 0 0 - > R .E m a. 0 8 0 9 Â¤) C 8 (D E c tÂ°E Ccouc - - D O (0 (1) m P (D Â·= C:Â» 22 O @% E LU 9 0 a O:6 J U) fo 0 1- G OE : 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4, 1.- 1 19 3- f 4 - : 3 2 9 4 L O = m E -C a, v 5 -2 2 â‚¬ 4 2 u; 13 0 F g Â§ 5 , m 1 C w (D vv* 2E . J CCM C (D U , r. i & 2 8 2 2 21Â§1Â§ S z 2 5% , 09 c c W C E 00 00 = 6 54 9 C .92 0 4 C ,- co k U) - bE 2.% 2-2 i c I j,V 9 0 0 0 o a m f a.o .@10 â‚¬ mEE B 0 E , . ~*4 X -C . â‚¬ -3, jer t + 2 Nt w >C -- J M Â§)2 f g.j -0 2 22 Â®E al N , cy - (1) m 3 81 m N 2 . 9.03 -1â€¢' 02 00-0 7 v .ty'.=r ...Â· -'ll- fllf- :. 4 (D a E 16 2 2 0 0 RE2 8 0 0 0 - W J 9 i : . f..Al" ~E@ 2 O ~ 15 -s @ g &1 5 2 2 -3- b .5 (1) 8 g (1) h f - ; 41 -~. 1 v - 5*iâ‚¬ .t i 2 3 2 11 g m @213 41 1 44 @ 0 C E ~ e ~2 % 3 E 5 -- I 1 1 5 & 9 X =- 2 e (1) 6 (1) i 0 ./ %* -- m - X --C m 1- 0 - (D 0 a (79 .. b" I ' (D J '....1.- m m (0 . Â£ U.1 212 0 2 ma)(00 O 8- .. 44 C - â€ž A r Â¥ N < O 0 oz O 0-2EOE.6 & O- EZO Em 4 . 1.6 - ' J Soo 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 - -4:*97 E 11.-*5*31- 4 - r 4.3 i... 1.- r. 07,1-.5 .10141*'' t J ' 1 7.6- ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN , enter Master Plan to the area. Use every chance to r mountain experience. Get users outs sion and Goals for the Est s Pa The Rocky Mountains are w le traffic c reate a more accessib difficult; consider proximity a eparate user groups - con Enhance visitor safety. area should be aesthetics. efficient pedestri lu! 14 Plnoqs se!14!081 MeN experience is most important and sho vironment. area acationers. enhanced aesthetic and visito 'eoueuedxe of the Rockies J; guest. ilities that will meet t 1 experienc ays consider how 91 jueweBeueul Jo aoualledxe J o Travelers everywhere a 10 o ell; Â·lequlaw al SABAA -suoilepedxe o quall . s e eleei . '49.46*0Â¥ 11*ilic . ,<..~~&~~tf, 2 .be ..3>f:t,~aZ~WW,f..1 - ,~;).t jj i; L ".-2 1N:.- kiN eit 12=:.10 3JS -Gre. t J 10 - 4 - 2:'Al # i T. . 44 1 26@ tâ€¢4~ . ...... 1 I Â· '1â€¢! f 11 1 6 . -- , UU...1 7 ..,1. . '. . 4 . 12 - 1 . / i I 19. , , ,-1 . , bi, a :'' 8- 13 472 . L .Z Â·Â· , 1#p h Â·Â·Â·tr Â·r. â€¢r k. â€¢ 'AE : 4 â‚¬ r I = ...5 4, 4 .'1* . 1 Q) Â«- 4. i =1 Â¥ - .1... y !1 -,> 1 i<ir n . 1 Â· /-4 4.- :. I ~!. Â·- f r :11..:Â· :26 ~6 416 .5 ' -' P j. - 1, 1 2.t , e - 41, Â· .=fâ€¢ 9 ..1- 1 , .Â· I I 4 1 4.;541*TZ,~ Ri :*atÂ· c. ;27: tzÂ· , *97 .,- -1: : 4 : Â¢ p t Â® - I ...4 -6 7 . Ii: E f .,r c .-1 : ...C I 4,725 C i - a : .4: .*32 E- 0 4, + . E 41.9 j -- 0 0 C 0 86, 65 I 0 -Â¤ 5 0 E B E E - CS B- 0 0 0 _ O--2 1 000 3 2=0Â¥22 2 e.g c m -(DCD . L O L >, C ; JO â‚¬@cav g 2 03.016 102> 3 2 R = 2 & f -O - 2 0 8 k % 2 o c gauâ‚¬2 6 E OCXE(00,3 f 11 3 4%1 1 88 a 0 8 (D & 0 .E -R h (0 (0 9? m - E e 9, .0 9 u) 0-- - 0- -2160- (02 1.5 2 .E.2 2% 1 = 2 E 21 2 y a & m O 0 0 0 b > 2@obbemÂ°6&% I3 : 8 ~ ~ M E 0 u v 2 2 & 92 2 Â£ -- 0 4 - -2 22 22 0~vAA 0 .E 00 (1) 4 0 2= N (O 0 - 2. 2 -2 qi ./CO 92 91 45 >, EE-:i m - :g 6 L= 93.- O 5 a) a) a) 4 <ECU> m 9 52 0 a -3 16 U, 4 2% E :m * u,- O U O c .2 77 mo- E o (0 Â£ 0 4- 2 (1) 5 42 t .2 0 C Â¥ 920+622 CE .O ~62 22~22>m NE 8-R ESE2%32EQ a) tz b!62 ~~aa=Baks *81265%3Â® (0 (1) 11_ auS t Â·.0 4, a $ la 14 8 Mr, 5 14 g ok=by&% a)â‚¬- a, c wa- 022E 60 (Otka>wJ.=.-- of E a) M Â£ â‚¬1?JE <0 1.- - 6- cga) -E (0 4 - (1) cy = o (0 fREPI 6.W 0 * C .5 .E Â·s M @ 4- .N 2 ~ .2 12 15 ~-*2 2Â£ 8 ~ 5- m O R RE = P .C 0 m v .%89 =CM a,InÂ®UÂ£E~ >~ B m 0 -M - r E 2, 2 @&42Â¥25~& < 2 8 -u -0 N b.~ Rti E 3& b 0 Â§6Â¤8 2 j 0 %2 ~Â£ 2 m C) a. U) . RZES Z F 1- 0 J J O C *2Â· aMB - r-0=6- O 0 -O 0 ME .C Cg ka) 9% J ./- 0 .% U 1 9, 2 E .8 2 1 O 2 92 SER -C Z L C 3 ~2eigf @fy a~8 m D g .b! ~- (D Â° - a) m 0 . -.. 12 (D 0 9 0 (1) c A E ..... 0,; B .2 2 %16 RE CO â‚¬ C) AW 0 2 5 0 0.0 0 -C v < m . U. 0 0Â£ < 2 S OL g E 2. : a) 1 98 cy 2 2~ 1- m Â§* t #>ifia.2 >0Â® 2 8) M Or (DC U Â§~C .6 C E 1 J 45 u) c & LE N LO 2 2 io Er o M 0253 0- 0 2, Â¤) * h (0 (D Z - .5? .@ 1 In R CEO 11.1 '- WCV i .C 1,1 - 2 ui= .2. g ~ 3.& 3 -- C H C CD bm E i > O 1-WI--<1 O -m a) 4-U) CD + = m = -W = 6 - 24 O- c > E cm .8 - -I. =-1 ro W ...Â¤ 0 -6 - 92_22% 1 2 E e â‚¬ m 9 Â° 03~1 co O = a -1 Of .8 0 U) . 0 (D .2 CD O -9 c -Di &~jE Lu . 6- .. (1) c (D (1) Â¤)-E (1) E O D 2 E ma*geÂ»=~~ E= @mt 89-Amo t 3 ~ff%# AlfegEÂ®-0 S Ed eiginos 2*ave 0 -0 6- 0 Ill 4- o Â¥ Â¥ G m .c Ci {2 Â·2' > EP .b! 2 -3 ~ 5 % 3 .~ .E 2 Oct; - 54 C)* #-3 < 0 92 2 c I a. .e t a r â‚¬ O -2 - g m 11 - (3 61 0,0 45.-v Â®=-(0'2 2Â·*4 g 2 0162 -Am 0 6,-c W O > c =292'0-Inwu >.Ek}g :8 18 . iii E 3 19 M ETEEÂ£00 0-~2~TEE&9240.Ecu 1-0200.Ecomo con>0 2*22> 1 -- ' ' .....f .. 1 - :1 2, 12 0, ~ cuvag221% C O C O 0 - 2,-2 E > 1- O R - 6 0 (D 2% 4-, 5 0 .C 0 - - W CO EED * ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN 1 .94*W.4-1.-Â·- YMCA of the Rockies ' ' f. 7914 Â·Â· Â·4+ - - --I --- - ' :47 9 e SLUEN uale,uoo Ranch. As t Administrati acilities on ' E'ENEFFÂ°Â° pue BesieAil.lue pue '6uipung lueifiold X eoe dun uees sew NTORY AND The Great Depression fo c 11 with the Baby curtailed operations, b SITE HISTORY fishing. Movin toward yE was established and busy sum onal m vem t. In 1 corpor i training ce This growth was have in raining events. Other gro strong kids, strong UlnU -(AU LU LUnlel041Ue'Al) epAH ly 1907, YMCA leaders attending a conference 1908 conference, and Me16 51!Ipe, I 041 pue and sta the first t to discuss Mied seis3 a pe man nt MCA s ummer facility was so successful Jelill.UnS mn ol ueBeq juelueAoul VO'Al 41 episino I e of the existin wed soon therea by raini of Moun m et pejeiod oou nce purchas sU!6 snoieue eouejei ams, such as art .V .,1 F#.9.- a . L. - U . 8 - - - ff H ...9 -- . 4 4 I 1. '' . : h 1 $ T"*JO.' 3,17-.Â· ---llâ€ž e~ F .4 11.,~ Ail Â¢ 2 - =425. - - , 1.1 1 16 - . 0 . . 0 - *. b <re ~ .. ''1 : 19 <It . r - till- 4~ 1 . bÂ» * , A I :4 - 1.11 1 7.- . - I * . /46- 2%:4â‚¬ 0 9 4 11 7 11,09. -11 4 t. 1 I .- / 441 1 .. . 16 A -- 1 2 1 4. Fl & .. * 0 , r. Â· 4 . A 'm 4 6 1 <A - , i - 46 3924 f.. .4 71.1 .4 9 - 1 6 4 08'. I *'4 . 4. - 1 t.4.11 1 1 . I y"- .,1 9 r " Â¥ 9, 4 . 1 , I. I . ' r- . r , *Il , 1 4.. f V . 14. ti:Â¢ . Z 0 5 , tr - 1 *4 . W, k = 4;' I .ar k. -4.4 2 IL + .- tilt i . Vitaw I ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN YMCA of the Rockies Buipling @AgeJ}siu!UlpÂ¥ 0!Jols!H 02 Z 0 :C b 0 & C O '5 -0 co O .9 7 k : .6 J 9 9 (0 0 0 . 2 0 - - Â·- LO - 2 20002 co .SES,-19 9 2 2 8 9 t om.mi28 AN00 # ZI-1-1--64- al> (D A Â» C N W h t r O >4 4- LO CO b m N .4 9 4>. w N W 0- 35 53 6 0 m N 0 2 2 2 ~ ip O 0 6- B L Lo o a) 1( co (1) co -O o CM. 1 0 < M N r- 0 X X X < = -r- 0 3~ 0005236 le L W A h -2 0 - (0 4: d OR . 02 5 M N O 2% ~ 0 (0 CO LO CO afz m 0 0 h L.LEI-O<O 42 . *. - 0 4Â· M h 4 2 :22 : .% M 0 2 % - 81 0 . -.1 .-1. . 'r. r 2 2 5 2 80 Â£ 3 -C 2 E E <<C -- LL LL 2 u) u 1Â§ 2 -2 0 2 2 0 â€¢a E- -- -:23 Z ~g C. 42 a. 1 2 M B .Â¢ 2 2 r 2 0 0 m 62 52 ~I 0 0 Â· 9 2.00 M' 65 E 0 0 0 (D E (1) 2 0 E (D - 01) - = .9 2 1 a) c -O OB 00 -0 . m (1) 0 22 22 e-2 m= m- *â‚¬ X C (1) O-0 7 0 I= = 0 0, >a,>0>->m 32 82 Ul DOOCK 1- â‚¬-2:-tk # 2 CL CL <~ <~ <O- <LL <C. CO 8 - - 3 9.2 1.4 Â¢1 4 2. - I Ir /0, Â¥ U t.4 :...el. 4 -Al M 1 + P - 1--. .- -- - 52 1 521 5 itt 1 -1 " P.1 05 36 . ' 4 ~- 9/ En - Â·. '1Â· I 2/ - - - - I , '2 ... 0. . 4/ / 4 '9 4 99% 0 0 1 0 I 1 a m 99 0103 EE = 1 2 14,74Â·9 C -- 2 2 & m m 0 (D C (D X V â€¢v -C C (0 + 2 M 5 it (D m ro m u. -0 - a) 0 - 0 (1) W Â£ 0 59 LU (1) C 4 Z Bc,fu A E ai a> 3 22 0 :mr- g 3 2 0~& 80 m @282 ~5 @05;2 - .Cl :7311 . A 0 >Â· E . 0 CÂ» . '05 1 >, 16 9 'C I E ; 4 2 1 ~ i. 1~ 2 E Â¤, 2 i 0 E 0 Â£ 16 m N - E b M M Z E u (O 0 0 - 9 t c g 2 1 0 Â£Â· 2 A Ea) C 6.2 m .0 16 v '6 0-*=[ 0Â·= _ ,Egau)-5 - (D K .t :5 2 Z c ~ 0 - m (1) E 1.3.0 5 I -2 '5 35 9 0 2 .- u, 2. (D 0 0 *.5 -= fÂ° 4-j f 3 -- z- r -z -0 --0 t .222.t 7 8.2.Za & 0 - 0 4, c 0 - 4- / M ~*.4.1. I. C (1) (10 0 - U) o %1 >. ... c (D - fo L g 05. 0 5~ p= ..u -2 0 -C O mb Â®22 wij~~~jâ‚¬ 22 EN*Zi 0 2 Di 9 .ES .5 ~ .,0 OJ-Di 39 J 4- -= 0 - ~ 2 00. 5 16.* 2 @ 3 -5' ~ a, co o Â¤~ -Â¤ O -0 -Lâ€¢-Â·-JOC U.1 0 0 M 4- m M M C 1-Atica) 1- a) -O 2 t 4 0-C U) O (0 m C UV I . 5- 0 1- I i t. E - 2 -A.0- (4 0 0 m - a. U} I 0 (D U) m - U) (D X Â» ul N M . 1 1 ESTES PARK CEN*TER MASTER YMCA of the Rockies NATION~ PARK ept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual apparent. 70.0 60.1 46.3 39.7 56.9 44.6 37.7 30.1 22.8 17.6 29.7 The Estes Park 1.90 1.18 0.82 0.61 0.48 14.01 I 1-70 F FI * 8.6 4.0 0.5 0.1 0.5 1.0 3.7 5.5 33.9 anic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Western Region Climate Center JOP!JJOO 4 jP!AA '00 L sep SJOPIJJO 10 JeqUInu ejelluxol Sejoe seeiv Supped - seoeds Bul>ped " --r'J"Z-- --- - --v-r-NTE.- -r---.1 o Jeqwnu lejol (Ts L LE'9ZZ) mapp ng (site surve i rmati on, topographic cord Monthly Climat imary, Estes Park, CO Sejoe Sajoe eaJÂ¥ padoleA sejoe 8 Z L pue eoruds uuewleBu3 Jo Sls sejoe 689 t the site is summarized in the Acres Record: 8/ 1/1948 to 12 inventoried wide range of existing data. BYPASS LOVE LAND ~ ~ US 34 , COLO 66 CHEYENNE, W'I~ 1-80 MAP NOT TO SCALE FORT COLLINS LONGMONT BOULDER LYONS -sdew s!s*ue Existing co ESTES PARK ELKHOR. 1 -t ROCKY M UNTAIN - 'SleAel JeAAOI jv a pue eu uo MO]6 Jed!un[ pue s, so inconsistencies approximately east and south b adjacent to priv dows, creek and IM pexill.lieju! le;!qell -seiBnoa Jo spuels :uns 841 pue :sedois 4)lou 381000 jv -elm elll jno46noil# punoi eie uedse mmunities vary with w pue luee];s awl -1 dois pue nal Park. T ase41 u! seeje uado :jueuiluop eJe JU eui sesseJB eA! leu 4 1!M PaieAOO eie SiseJOJ to 8,9 0 level and offers a wide . 1. i 42-' - ' 1,10?.I:-- 12*42 . > 149 - t 1 .1 1. -: r=.12 f.Â·- . 44 ., .... I L 1,1..:P r . I. 1 tÂ· -h., , TS,/El i 2. . J 9. 1 . I. I 4 '. '41 tal . . â€¢ i 4 ,; E f i - -1. , . 1 3-12-;Ti- I \. it & -44. 6 + i ( CD) .. . 12 1 4 g . I .1 2 - ' 'C 4.40% ' : Â© ~ . Â· ..i - . g . .U/C O I . Im/2 4&<, 476:4Â· : . - 0 . .':4.. .2 #*Â£% 2.- ..3,1~ I 4~ ..4 9 -3 * --r. 1 . ..It I - Al 00 :**24 Â¢ 0 8%5 te E 4 .13â€¢>"Â· a ME R *A R 10.. -- Cl- -.. --,- -1,/- - I /- , O 4- U) 0 10 ID (â‚¬ .- ... -l --- CDO" CO (9 to - LD h - n> 1 ~, 1 0 - N N '13l el 3 1 LO CD O 00 00 CO r 0000 0 00 r-- r /-- NO 0 - p h * 1.0 - 1 09 :12/3. r 1 0 N (0 (0 Â¢9 4- 9 . -e-".2 1 *SES 4 51 0 2 4- 0 00 N & 0 . 00 - 10 4 CNI N ID 10 N /0 & =41 9 2 E v 2 2 i. f Â£ & h O h . 9- (N a DE g E 00 h N 09 10 7 t. 000.- O r- r- 1,1 â€ž9-â€ž 10 p 61 M 2 E O 8 4 .92 0 -r/:... - PEE CIO a 01 J Â¥Kcl â‚¬8 E *= 8.2.R59 32 00 ae 2- 8 0 22 1 %ff f % 0 2 56%.~ .:' E m cu 25 *g E 2 2 06 CO IiI. LL -0 k W L a) - 1.1- I Â® C 45 m t (D O ... U, 2 -6-5 ro c LL O =OUN A. 0 OCC 80 -92 ~E Â® 06 0 (D :.e-- i 5 95 95 20 52Â·ES 0 1 - 52 E>> mE 05 e , -1 44391 c -er ,= m 2 a> . IIi......k.- .- a>> 8!6 @2Â§4 3 0 ro o U) E U) (D ~ .9 0 IJ 3281* C!*r. tt= t 2 8 2 4= m 022 f 88 a>La).= .t N (9 * 2 0 Co 0 0.0 0 4 8 2 2 8 &Â® E Â§2 1 8 2 = 1 : M X 22 k. e --0 5 gE28 - O 2 3 FE * z0 3 Z I 21% 9 2 m CD N (9 4- 0 (9(DLL U) U) 03 3 = 01,2 3 0 CD O 0- CD u) 0 U) L=- 73 .Â¤58 .la) m 0 0 0 2 2 2 O O y< 0 (1) ME 15 09 ~pi~i 0 1-Â¢0 3 - 255 Ct af 2 0 (1 E< 3@ E E 2690/0 3, ~ 2 -2- * g f 2- s i (0 -x-2% .il FEd Â·Â·Â·L -- 2 31 2 ER*2&* f#22*~fiti 98 & 92 -0 3 ... -0 : * d-1 7. m O .- ,-6-D4.-/ 4- 82 (D 31 t=Q -22 92 -I, -Â° M â‚¬ ir ir 9 L /11 HiL M -g k ' E .96 13 -5 - 65 1% S g b @ *a# ~5Â¥E~=a gi m.~#i RE-% 0 45 0 73- RE (D m '8 -D; O 9 E .8 00 7 v Â« m A= w 9- 0 -Â¤ I *2 5 2 gi F E. O a, p (1) E -7 k O 28 0910-000*. ~ E E E -0 = 1- 0 1.â‚¬ID.- u Â® 5 2 0,2 2 = = c 2 - - m >' w (D 1 4354 - >. E .52 @ * 6 06, :m U) w 9 - .- 76 &.9) -9 2 K 22@R- %E*4ZE2um ~ ~ 8 =9 52 2 v Â£ E 0 -6 0 4 9 E 3 & e .92 9 2 2 ~~ Â¤ - 5 a) - CL -Â· e v v e - (0 - (D 1; 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ E % i #3 f Â·RY 1.-% 1-Â§ 3 E ii ~-5 m & {0 8 Â·R 0 18 Â·:. k; co .g~ ,N %2 2â€¢-r ; * C J = C (0 9 ' p *, Â¤'Â§ 2 0 &2 5 w a.s Â¤)(D Z - R )5 9 2 E 9, 8 N 2 3 Z. 18 10 2 2 %- E 18 i 3 5 4 2 3 5 5 2 m 2 ro .m .2 'B E> 8 8 - ,- 0.69 -g EooKE2-%<4539(03,-O99MEM,-9,*cou,PH-.0:5528.222* 0 Ul . a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 13, 2.2.29*222 2 .- Z -'?mt J j LO . 10 O.1 1 zZZZ Z 4 0 - 2 22 ..4 .,Ar:: C E W, 00 -25 E ag a 0, I m . m U) CD u X Guest Lodging Administration Center Interior ' A-#d.: ~OL'G L L 68Â£1.9 Dll!J 01 luees s6u!PI!nq Z69'0LZ &6Â§-t Etz'SZZ ttz'9ZZ structures were added to the site, Total Squ r 9ZZZ se Jeedde 'suoip o At the Center, an effort has been made to tie the diverse building styles together by use of consistent colors for paint and roof shingles. a style described as "mountain The table below summarizes the existing building terri stick." istics. A details inventory table is included in the e,BOJd pue 'eoueueju!e,Al + se!1!I!0e:I 'eouefe,uoo 'sao!A.las }s ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN Bedroom Cabins Idings Bedroom Cabins F/4 the various styles of architecture appendix. Staff Cabin o The original buildings were constructed in the YMCA of the Rockies luees s6u!Plinq ld-ngs a e the s should respect and reinforce this s that are related and cre e6el!Je4 Ulejunolu Jepinog u! snduleo ieej ueo auo le41 â€žaoeid Jo asuesâ€ž |~|haa~~hf~||~ed~1~~eaverÂ· sty eoueJeedde paz!uefiJoun uney uoiunekl XI! ach n -sndweo ell} 46noJ4j 4?1 t little consideration to the context E 1.1 1 0 . 9 . . , 1 Elt .*.Fo 61 . 4 1. 1 3 M, V 4 I .1 ty ! * 16. 1 -04 - - 13 4 . c 1 ill 41 1 h, F -1 -1 .k i .6 . A , .9, 1 * e y $ *h. r.,~ ' 1 . I .... . - - , 1 I. - - 0 W 4. k C - 2 ov -O c) ul .* 4, C 5 .5 -E li ~ j -6. b 5 2 ~05 J C E o = S N u) (D Â£ SE Emo C 3 - C.C . 11 R a, 0 0 0 0 = (00 . ' UJ 0 =I * 2. 11 0*3 m -u, I J.i. 2 m 0 -6 8% % 8-~ 11 1% 26 3-2 49 .. E- 0- 2 i m d C /4- a %55-Â§-%fÂ§-; Â·li i f - 4- 0 + 5 -0 (1) 0 0 6,- S .. 2 .I (0 w ,- EIE 05 ~ 2 1 Â£08 QU 20* (D ? 3: 60 4 k 0% 42 Z g o El v C v= 2 2 16 5 -92 & v g (D .85 2 125~ 02 0 a .52 g g ~ ZE ,;}t (RE r (D Â£ O 5 32 c 9 m E c ,- * 2 18 -g :% w oi u * f E)11 -3â‚¬F 4 2 -% 0 ~ 212 . 49 0 IN * 0 0 - 3 -12 (D * 5Â¥ 22 21%& 2 1 8" . ' f . 0, 0-E 3 3 i 3: .f 3 082(0 MU,J * &*1 4 sso 20.1 0 CO 0.0 m râ‚¬ C u u) . , ~' (1) a. (0 C > a) U) 9 5 Z (D 59 0 (D h 0,12 c - I 02 0 0 85= c 5 :E #3 & 82 i ..... - I - S I. -Â«12 42 ? 1 f w &; * B 4/ * 2- :5:53 *' .& c: 4 c, r. Ef ~ f 02 1 :r 000 0 16 5 FE 3 5% 8 -5 8 3; E- 0 T *P if d C a A .2 0 (D t :g u, a.7 111 (D 0 .12 .1 - - 0 L U O 1 :4lbâ‚¬IZE-@SN-EE@Ro al! J . . 9 8 g i ;g .2 W 1 6 O M 0 0 E> 1000 0 .- U) a) 0 (D â‚¬ 2 P Ui .CD (1) '2 g c E IF (1) :as ~ f P 2 4 0 0 HA 18 ' *0 ~ Â£_3 20 0 => V' CO 2% 16 -0 c N >4 a) -C 5 .E C - U I- (0 m 2.% 27 0 02 9 0 E 3 31. (0 C $2*E .E 82 @28 0 4- 0 O -0 J d lit 3 -1 2- 5 -2 2 1 0 i E 3 . Â£ 5 Â® 0 * 2 g ~ Z 2 &# 2 O C 6- E g 0 11 g d 3 0<N G m -E a. 03 m c 8-0 15 h. a U) at J . CD 0 LU < . o Joo O 00 0 1 O Et 0 ti ro Ul 3 -5 C O E w - c Â·;= 2 0 e .9 3 0 2/3- i m 0 (1>L 12 -- & U) -EE a .2 0 .8% E.5 2 0 0 . ed c L eli -0 92 .'J M (1) 2 3 = r 2 2 Co 5 .U - I E 16 -~ e 6 oe-m *coÂ·g ~=% =g-%2 -= -m- =E &-5.-0-*e-2 -1=-2 -m- E Ze m .24 o L -k- - A -EU) 4, *2 0 2% 18 * q? .c -~ m e- 2~E %0 %=2Â·~ 5 2 -* E ji-% 5 Â·@ & id E.8 -2- i *% 1 2 0- 0- g Â·Â·17Â£ 1 -1 . + - - 64 (0 4. 0 f /, a.ff > J , 1 1 0- E 0 v 00 m fo c 0 C J E u, E - 0 = O 0 0 C (D -Mi E E owme,Rc (1) w O vitriE Q-AÂ£- 33 12 08 1 2 0 ~ ~ a. r?4 i Â£ 29 9 -@ R O # 2 4 19! * k ~ 2 0 -C â‚¬ 2 % S % O g : 2 o T e w D ,Â·g Â·â‚¬ $ R.6-a.g := r Â·= 6 -3 4 2 20 *' M J & 2 N j 2 E zo :ER & 8 g ~ '~ E 1 2 Â·~ 19 m E 0, %â‚¬ %>.206Â·ca g %-9 E 2 m iE ~E OO =t= = fo-Â¤ o E M ALLI . 03 0Â¤ a.3-0 a>.10%2 ES>So. r N > 00) 0 0 -m = m O - 2<22 M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O-0 0 0 0 0 * M -1 - '7''It I.M.,1.LI#1 . 3,04 .#k. I. â€ž K CENTER MASTER PL YMCA of the Roc ed eie seeie uiqeo elli 01 pportunity for additional oca o bri s fo einoip Supped pue peoN o Buieq eie sjueipX ieuollipp eis oj a>iii PinoM .seu Galvanized water pipe replacement - yearly Su!06uo XpeaX - dool lue}SXS 38}EA/\ Electrical/Telephone/Communications Estes Park Light and Power (EPLP). Overhead Long-term - Wireless internet system in all w existing small systems using e~~n the gravity would ity has been the issue in the tions for future tank should help alleviate spefoid welsXS uoipejoid eJ!:I o 6u!06uo eoueuejuielu eul S . 9001 U! peu6!sep sialljo pue ' Jo %09 s! 4oedeolu g 4 ;dep,9-6 01 *lieinfiel S! puod Â· er. Needs to be initial workshop, meetings were ongoing replacement program dld3 Xq eoueuejuieul euil r===tmu~e tinTghse program cabins .uoileSUJ! see leinieN puod kesjoa o 1 19 le!Ped â€¢ 1 leMU,Jols lue}Sks UO!~0010.Id 31!=I District (EPSSD). 0 Long-Term El trical/Telepho e/ tap fees are currently $4,000 per ystem expansion is constrained U 01 euoid ele s! 40!4AA *pedes W - pipe is being replaced as a agreement w th YMCA expires major treatment plant expansion elevations. Staff cookout is anks coming on line in to renegotiate. EPSSD i ige = $400,000). e Bide:S.=PI~rrJ es;46!3 JeleM JO Bul>IJOAA S! weifold UoileAIeSUOO J 966 L u! Jeah esn JewAA Spefoid WejSXS JeleA/\ el - jueweoeideJ lueld jue -eld 'uoileill!J elpelu lena 'siee* 9 p<ell OJ pepe]103 90oz ui XeNuepun i L 1.-1-~- 3 1 .., 4 ., EIS: 7 Â·* - j. . 1*â€¢ (D v r. p (D J. L CD 0 0 O O i m *. * -- - 0 8. 05 0000 O 0 r11. - ... 9 . . E E 2 4 - Â· ./ W., T 2 +AL Â£ ci ~5 0 -- I I " 4-2 01. f. 3, 744 Z.EM uf a) & E 1 tsÂ¢ N te m 9 22 c - .-Â· W ~ Id - O , :,W 1 E r E-8 E E m v "*r, ..1 . M , 4-11 ' 1 E-2 83 -0 Â¤) O U) (1) L ENME 00 , . 1, I. I c (1) U,2 m & 2 3 5 Â¤) i'. ., 4 0 - 8 00 C C> â‚¬ F Â»50 * .. 1 , 2 2 92 0 E N B mat 2 - (1) ui a 0 0 0 (D -9 I Â¤) 01; 2 E g ir 5 # :g z m * t 1 1 2 8 .in ~g M m & 2 2 {0> 2 ~ '3 0 00 k ~ Q. ~ CO (0 0. O J O ME<< 1 .1 [1 1 ' - 'litilk : &000 00 0 0 1 } 19/.Ii./1//1-/ I.-Il.-&-I..i./.Il-j. I I v /*<digb/8 E gi ~ ~ .c . m k E 25 .9 Aill@* ./ar,/74~ m: 111 : .52) >. 1? ~ 13 8 06 " 2 Â· Â· .3.#*P~~7 m m, m M E 61- 61 Â¢ 1/1 , ./*ty'Q'/lita'/4;J."Ik,;i'.di .. > U) 1 A 4 -r . - 644 r 2.* 1 6 8 0 2 26 v h.11 11 V- p~ li + 2, .1 + 0.62 M *- a) E , ./=I#Â£*-.- < Ul ~MStiWi~,ins.*Â·. ...... c# r F. Sci) .911*Zin if%& . 2 4 1 11 1 C C - i .i W #1 , 1: 92 0 2 1, 52 2 & 26 . 0 . ..7 4, i ~ -2. _tz't ~ ; ~ g E ~ 19 Â£ ~ ' 'th 12..... .1,9 . g 5-22 2 1 - 1 1 -I I â€¢R AS>r. 2 Â¥ : i ~ ~- @ 2 -E 2 E 3 @ 2 * E 2 Z , - I 40 . 1 ' o v ~ 0 -3 r. c .- - li c m .2' E m e. U 1/ 2'7 - {OCK.Gu,[Â£0232>632~Nu.la.ELLIE 0 3 eo O 00 000 0 _ p EL "1 " Â·r. I in several areas. Site lacks clearly corridors. haIMe gadd~nagstoZZLn and Pedestrian and le areas lack segregation. edestrian Pedestrian areas are z accommodate 't 11(.11.11*1.,Â·Ill Mountainside crosses through a private disorganized Pedestrian areas do not meet ADA guidelines. large groups, creatin issues of safety and are disorganized and o Building entries not celebrated, and often Pedestrian Areas greatly reduced rience, te lacks outdoor gathering areas to scape islands. efficient pedestri c engineer areas. narrow. Iding damage, and u accommodate groups. is needed. Site lacks outdoor seating areas. ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN 22222'ft and traffic grows. A turn lane A requirements. tension between the YMCA and private MCA of the Rockies reducing the visitor experience and ay equire traffic safety im provements, ersections are hard to n te circulation leads to back doors and service s narrow and i *, 4 . Z.â‚¬: f.i:Pi '. 4 8 /- 1. . 9 v 1 . Nk A j lid 1...1 f Â¥ 4/ 14 11,7 - d. .h 111*- la .2 1 I. . yall/ , 0, 14 <j , ' '14 1* -/2 er '51. J.t: + 4 7/Ii & I ''4 4 44, i I 4 , b ' 2 , A . t. 0 4 4.. . . I * " . U .474 I 56Â£J A Â¢ a j 4 rf., A7 i ..1 , b z.,fi ':i *Att -9 D. 9 t , 4 4' :, Â· 5.14 3 ' I . 1.- .2,16, 1 .2 lir , 1 C I ''F . 42 trÂ· 1 + 11 : i /5 i L. . 1 11 L. -I. . ' I.M.,4/' . :-9 i 1 4,11., 4,,Z ligi T 14 |~4/3 il . ./., 1. 1. ,'A.wrqj' ~ m. , --I--- .-it tf'i it Â· loj l r-Â· $< ;4 4;,>'&1: 1 3 0. Net,, ' 1,4 3.1 , 1 4 9.04 *fm . i. . i I < . &1 -- m (D v - P 0 Â® 2 E E 1 2 0 -m i m - (D 5 0 0 0. Â£ E 25 M om 2 2 8 ~ = E E 6 - m 11 r m 0 a) (0 (1) 85 O Z g 1 0 0 1 - -G >, > CK--4 ~ WE g af E E .E : 2 15 5 (D R m > -0 2 -2 -2 2 -1 -2 M uS- > Y; Wâ‚¬ (0 & fg 75 - m - r (1) a * 0 0 1 .E-E ,1 2 3 f 2- 8 0 -0 O (D 0 0 C 16 0 0 Co 1. c 7 %~2 5 8-1 vaEg â€¢EN ~.9 C a) 0 2 -54 ZE â‚¬-3 (li C E (D E c E % 0 :% 1 g & E (D % 2 A @- 0 0 M 5 -C .9 10 U ,/3 -43 9 -C _ .Â£ 6- -C (0 9 0 -0 2 .9 56 (0 C .- -E@ 2 Ef -9 -mot 4 o NES*-2 Zr a, 4- 6 - m â‚¬2$& -52 *a, ~ E .0 2 52 .T E Q - -2 0- 1= 0 -x -Â¤ (1) O (D (1) =b c E:316 FE-EmEE-5 3, m V k &2 :5 3 C â‚¬ % -3 ~ a e E 2 -2 5 2 -Â£ 2 -28 m 2 2 2 u = 0 -5 Z 28 AS BL E- 22 1/ m ./ *Cl CL m al (0 -obs" 8 2 I Â£ E & i Â®H on-.6 < Â¤,H E 2 co cu O.oz . 23 .a <; a 15 .9 22 1> C) .E :E @io 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 100 0 0 E G 2 2 > R U) ro 0 -C ai ai m Ec 2 2 2 f 3 I C ~ (1) (1) 9 ..2 0 -2 - -W- C m (O 16 (1) (D - 2Â§~2 197 7 -=77 27 5 -3, 22.i mt '0 42 m .2 8 0, .- .92 -5?52) 2 (A Â° b S &.f 1 2 2 1 9 C C_â‚¬ 2 -5 8 65.t E E (O m : A 1- m Â¢Zooo 0 0 0 ,00 ESTES PARK CENT ER MASTER PLAN YMCA of the Rockies 44 474Â§ 44)23,fy,- -- elu lueld Jo AleAO,al pue 4]MOJ 6 6u!1!U]!l iAA seeJe u! #16!Jq KleA S! Bu!14 ie seeie esn 4614 u! se asseJ ou 41!AA ue]Jeq aje see and Open Space Jo seo.Inos 6ugeeJO ' eospuei tree and shrub lands n~eedfill ~eplse~ at benefit. water draina anagemen seeje 146!sun -SeoinOS }46!I ske,Apeoi eeze ulqeo O and eroded. yfinding signs are very lim ed. c) signage is lacking. age could enhance the tional sign symbols should be utilize hting is non-existent. Sign graphics at night, especially the ail system is unmarked. *2*Tacks clear connections to site o Opportunity exists for improved trail connections to Rocky Mountain Park. This will require coordination with the National Park Service speeu lualsks provements. wayfinding o Irrigation is in very limited areas and revegetated. Cut 1 - A - .Â·' 7 9. ' -t .-6- i .d z ...,- 2, - 4 41,2. L 2!29 3 a) 16 a := Ii. m * .. - - C 8 0 0 - U) E 2 cÂ® 0 2 2 2 r; f t: 1 . -oOP -C 82 m M m -2 E (DE ~~ ~~ (0 (0 om .* (1) (1) 1 0 0,1 2 Z.O Z azE 2 -at r- J 16 D O 0 0 00 0 O 0 .O 00 0 0 0 0 2.-27'J :21.- I- 27 . I (D (D , 2 .9 - cD E 5 b CD '05 U) 0 .9 1 7 2 2 2 -2 2 g b2E 2 03 .0 w 23 K & 83 1 2 CO-- C L 26 % 2 i 11 1 -2 2 (D 2 -2 .50 ro o (1) m t O C C 11.4 2 -, -.... >1 Ec .C R E b 9-I m m .A - 0 c R Â£ : 9 0, m 0- 7% 2 E .2.-1 1 5 2413 cl 2 cs= 0.- 43 E a) D d m - 0 0 a 8 2 . go=COSE- m O 12 2. & 1E J~ ~ 6 1 16 0 r--- 3 2 2 82 8 12 Er 31 % -A- --=OE 2-- (0(DQJ '0 2 @ ~3 E E a) R - V. e w .E- O 0 >. - a 12 b - -- 0 0 0 3 cc=o 3$22 : Ek # 2 E CD m z .2 :% 2 9-.2 15 1 m (1) m w m O 0 A L j >. 6 .9 LI.1 -b <.E Lu E a LL E LL -5 ID uouw 2 Y E M â‚¬ 3 31 2 2 z.g 90 . . 05 .... .... . 2 4X J 0 00 0 0 00 (F & 5 vi 2 5 (1) C J= 0 0 0 v m - i - (D co- g 0 0 ._ 8 E Â® Â£ g, i 3- 0 {0 .8 E 1 1 32 8 .C (1) .mi = 0 m 83 > -16 3 (0(0 2 0 111 16 6- :11-32 n A E RE &3 3 M 2 -C 4 r >2 U 22 2 4- 4- Â£ * PC v >4 222--14 2 2 -2 c 2 20 RE N .1 0 o E 0 a ~:~A = 0 - ,0 2 16 # 3 x 9- 2 g 16 '- EE 2* 20 E ~i 2 -2 Â·= -Â¤ 0 0 4. 2 2 W z = 0 0 (0 - 2 a C 02 - -0 0 L -ZIL 0 4% c C O 0 2 :E m Ck.2 O-0 ~ ,~ 2 -~ (1) mâ‚¬Â§) 2 U, 2 8{8 CD C .O .- .. U) C * g #t .N 2 (D E < 0 Â·-(D =Â¤... 0=EE - m - NE 0 E- 2-ro 5 0 5 w . i & 8 6, 2 0 0 izgEÂ£83Â§~g3% I.*5 622.,e 8%#2Â§~Ea<agEÂ·% Sk Eall .- a 6 2 0 J m (1) 5 W.j w .. V- .... 0 ~ I 0-J- CE . . . O. . . r - . 7 0 O 0 60 0 0 12 2 - (D Â¤) 0 - -6 0 0 gs > E 0 0 a t. 2 9 -g k Â§- 2 E 2 0 .3 8 0v 0 0 0 J LE u; 0 -Â¤ .. O Â·. 55 5 2, 2 O 2 M .. > CE *05 Â·Â· ; 2-/% :7 + - L-1.. Â® 9 13%@ I. @ 94. 81 2 0 C 8 772f (10 r A- 1 -C EE ~ 0 m e 4- - :82 5.0.0 O 0 C.Â¤ I * mc 0 U c632 .8 -5 -32 -W SE v - m.05 c O g â‚¬ c S -8 (9 2 N m80 @4 E v 1.2 1 -9 ... 0 4) .3 (0 -9 O.-u)(1)(1) O- Â¥4 :E O m 2 I* E â‚¬ 2 -* 9 - 0 0 n O -- 2- - e (0 C C)/C 3.24 4 3 C 3 (0 (D i-2 7 9] (0 (1)11' (D Â£ O .22 - câ‚¬ O 0 - 2 E m m E E - a o o 2 5 & 3 2 19 00 J- ane J 0 -C @ t f g -2 2 -g 0 .- W.- .- & F E r., E 0 28 k 0 < < H 0 ..CE>, rou) 000 . . . I . . . . . 0 1- (D O E (D 4- B 0 C 0 (D 2ccc C CD - 6- C g) 5 5 -a) i 00 -C 0 2 CO a. (D g Â¤) 0 O 0 A (0 2.11 if 0 C E Â£ 3 2 - m 6 9 (0 7 (0 _1â€¢ 0 .1 U) v 2 m a..92 13 ms Â·a E * E ~ C~ ~ g * =: . 2-23 2.533 *2â‚¬ 6 2 0 E m Ec W *9 0:0:Z@Es -3 2 m 2 M M E g 2 -S Z ~~ * ~ ~ in 'if a 2 (D (1).6 m O O r m LLIDEMLLOHI 2 *.52 > m Ki - '0 '3 7 u- I g E m C O - 2 J C (D W c .0 41 - : - 5 0 2 0 . m Zo O 0305-6 mo O 0 4 ... ed to accommodate a diversity of guests for d to accolnrrc~df~t~ ~~%~,f l~cv:Is of ore high-tech developed facilities for cess road west of the Need close-in parking for those who need it. Currently some conferences providing golf carts to maintain a si gle Curren tly issue with luggage service - no to store for late check-out, no system for o Some groups rent 20% of a lodge, but request 009-00Â£ - pepeeu eie se!)!lioe, Buneew Je6J Lower Hyde : aygrounds with natu ral play a change and will be Consider two-story architecture for efficiency. east side lodges for future staff housing Joi suiqeo Al!lueJ Jser,6 plo 6uiweAUOO Japisuoo eeJe Bupped pejeeullep ON â€¢ 6uinponpiHsenll!oe;puT 6uNIonqueT'el-ul Alejelduloo e eAell 01 4!liqe e 6uu 83!1 6uns!xe eoueque pue ezilell,J (suonein6!Juoo wool 41 q 01 enp) uelieH Joi uoilepodsue.4 iepisuoo ol peau Alilioe, esnol.NO-Noe q e aq pinous eqi ui 86poi d~:ueufr n ulooJ Jed eldoed k Joi Pa eoueuedxe Xy seoeds ino-Memq Jooplno ON passejppe h conference and family. ning lanes, etc. t are looking for them. ests for accessibility. facilities in close p 0% of meeting rooms. 6u!sn04 Jieis ejepilosuoo J XeM e - SWOON peleoole] eq Xe41 Pine uedo emue 6u!Sol JeAO l.lie eoeds meAud eAOJdlul *pedeo W Ne Aliueilno SluOOJ BU! JeeIN O ino46no.341 seuo leuoiuppe pp o peuiqwoo eq pinoo uolisdA u! SWOOJ ell.L â€¢ slueJBoid pue suonouni #els Joie 10!Ulloo e eie suloo.I 6uluip o; SepeA!lea o uo!jejue!JO JJels Joi e l.UOOJ eoueJeiuoo/6uiul #els leleAes JOJ eoeds 801#0 i~eadnyanh~s~osr~cd be cilities ice/experien joadxe j s! /olpne @Aew lou seop Jej eq~peeu 11 IM lualqoid s!41 'SUIOOJ pelepino SWOO.1 1SeJ eAO.Idl.Ul Aq pesn Aiienpeele seoeds 6unee iseq s! efipol uediv SulooJ Je6Jel olu! eldoed Id be investigated locations. d was a r le w theft - could access in the 41!e, uiewei 11!AA le41 se!6oloul.Pel Jep! seeie uiqeo Al! oppele - 6uipei6dn peeu se!1!1!jn -001 pun Je slees iejeeqj!4dwe 6uil el.]j lie JO jsalielus el.~1 u!41!AA JO pelews -Ie41!e 'SWOOJJSal S 01 enp MOU IleAA 6u!}UeJ lou s! uolls Buileelu oj Xuu'!xoid esop u! Jou eie se6 aP!4eA 6uns!)(3 - 41!oed eoueuejumW aP!40/\ o ational Fields. i.e., streaming video sulooi Bulleew 46noJ41 se06 80!Ales Alluelino O *suloo] 6ulleelu Je Jeindod *JeA eie (auloil!M pesn eq ol peeu iii/A pieu Jeooos e 6umnd gms punoi-Jeah JOJ esa4} eA.Jesekl 4 e41 e>PI - se!1!ule:I 41!AA Je Jesn I. ...U ;11 1, Â·e'l) sellolod peleAoo/seoeds ino-Meeig o pue ile, 041 olul uolleonpe JOOp Food Se s should lance state-of-the- and issues. The be service hours Conference F cilities: Fairchild experience; technol SLUOOJ pe pepuedx3 iq ins isow 041 Aoldule JO 4.10[elll areas. juiodpuels ezE luooJ e luoi# el*ol 6u!19!xe lou si pue deals s! uieJJel 'eeie eoueuejuielll ., L . n ESTES PARK TER MASTER PLAN !111' j Howard V . C .6.0 02 0 ro C J 2 NE g ME .0 Â®(0 01 Em i gn B 2 .6 (D 2 4-0 4, m E u -c m% C N .9 .2 (0 0 a) O m O 0 (0-0 0 - 0 0 2 0 (D _ -- -C A a. ro 0 c ii o 11 i Â£ 0 /- ED M 4 3~ b= .3 us In (D 0 J 1% Y) f R.E Â®1 (0 - " v E E u) 1~ U a Â¤) Â¤) E 2 (0 (1) = ~= '~ g 2 0 g) 2 0 4 1 -4 E .0 .& 3 44 -E i .E J OvOOCOMCOMÂ·62 (1) Z >- CEO > g E .- Co .C O W m .5 g -2 E 10~0 015 ... . 0 0 -3.g J ro > O 2 83 ID 8 m G - 00 0 000 000 00 1-. o E & r. E 2 2 2 6 W J .7, (0 a) C (1) (1) 0- O-m 4 4 %5 - :3 U) a ~ ~~ :g~: it~ g 0 0 U) ... 0-7 Â£ 6 - 2-I - CD (0 0 0 a) 0 0 0 8 & M E E .92 .2' .9 li -s e -0 Â£,2:Li 'si-I 3 il *~ I Li : S (D FriOF=tÂ£] .... ....:- E 00 0 3 0 792 - .73. 1 -i ... w.g T 8 rot J 0- b Ovk O c 0 m m W o D U (1) co p O .U) E M 9 -5 >,S 0 0 21 = 1 -2 E *1 gl of 15 2 2 8 c Â® #2 -C = = 1 -- a) C ~ 1 1 6 m 2 12 .0 2 .E E 0 . 08 .- 060 -- 8 a 22% .Â¤ 4- a) bi t. .2 -5 :- r 34- 2 13 ad El .va, 2 EM-w r =0808 I c E' 2 E -@ 13 . 26 ~ 15 ~ -~ & 1 -~ ~ Jo 4,2 0 1 ., 1.= 1.= 9 v (1) O Crl :* *2 1 1 CÂ»Â£3 %'53~ g# 3 2 m 4 0 50 6 23 N 2 5 3 b @ c & 5 R < E = :* -92*2 e m.(265 1.- -- 2 2 Â·c - (D .E 7&2 *4*.-I.I--1- 2 2Â£8%*#15+ove sE_ a, -Â§ g ~U) ~ ~~ U) 2(1)~oa- :dâ‚¬ 133 526: _t--Â· - . 8 -2 - @ 1 cÂ» 2, Â§- 't 1& a, 5 32 -2' 91 2 0 -c w c O ki (D -i Ji fl E :- al E E ~ m y) 0 6- (0 C 16 Â£ :2= 0 8 - 2 0 (0 13 m -5 g w v Â® 0 (D (1) 12 0 0 C ESE < S H 1- NE@ 916 - 25 0 2 m 5 2 .e Jv a, v -u ~ ~ 0~ ~ ga a 9 5 -2 2~ 3 E MY.2 0 a) 0 0 Q <v< < >-Â¤ O- 0 1- t a >.Â¤ 0 0 m CD u) . ...... .J a)-O 000< -3 :C - 0 O 0 0 00 000000 O 0 0 - 7=-7-7 - - ~r -7 2 . - ... =21 1 2 E c 2 00 195 -%2 (D .2 . R .Ill- 2 72 g /-4-'- 0 0- m Q) --CS 0 2 8 19 ba 0 0 0 . 6- 282 /2 c 4- U) u) .2 0 28 ING)(0 (1) 9 â‚¬ 'e u, .0 m- 3 E WL' m 'g g 1 E 16 5 1@ * .1 Â£ 0 v E m E ui 2)-Â¤ .- C 0.- s , E -as E - m v (11= . ~Sh .0 0 2 2 - 0 0 0 (D _ E C 0 (1) p:gm 2.58 -8. 8 12 282 I -a (D .9 12 57 73 X m :8 Â· < i v a E 23.Ei 4- /0 JO m o v (D S 1.-02 1 U' {0 0 C - n 9-={00 022%; 22 . tj ~ Â·; I# 2? f6 222.~~22 6 42 22. 2 Â£3 5-2 3 O 0 10 00000000 ;r O .I- cc E~ t= 2 a) 0 m 'E C &} .g .c &5 -,43 4 03 0&% B 1 90 65 0 -16 (1) Eg ~3%2Â§f* 2 0 Â£~Rgs EF -1 32 w D .a .. w 15 15 .3 1 1. - co Wwoceo v E ..3 A- M Â¤).c 5 - LU (D - 0 a> 82 7 ~0 42 (D .2 # .2 2 2 2 -C O c vi.1 7 % 0 2 0 00 2.8 2 22& b - ~@ 92 2 4 (1) M ro ro a) E E' E Â® 0- 0, a M & .8 U) (D - 36, e - J v .0 0 0 -002 c cv (DO ('DC 0 -(1) 1 - m di O ve? o G m 2 2@ - . g ro kv CW 5 1 -~ O E w atm 18 2112 4 12=2- -1.21- 7_I Flf-77 -~7 3 .~ ~1 m EL :& f; 8 g i~~1 2OE Ht a, 1-1 0 2 2 -C :E .Â¤ E 22 Z g O o 2 0 cm, ~ ~ ~ ~ Â·5 53 2 -2 B 2 â€¢ (1) 2 11 73 902 pa 2 0 16 0 -0 -0.16 2 a v Â® E m e W 2 5 12, ai c a. 8 *o .92- .2 2 E ner-RUIZ a o ai 8 -g) Ro EOE.Z.16 5 2 -9 51) a m 1- -=vE k ... I - ... .- Â£: 51 02@lzE.20-(Difztiuu, Â® t:*# 0 0 0 4; 9 J '85 E.> .92 & -0 1% 0 16 . wIC - 0 0 0 * 2 .9 W .4 0.2 0 O C a, 0 0 0 C .2 -C U) x m 1- c CS_o . U) . . 1 2 1.5 :% v -a 2% a 52 g LU 0 0 .b (10 > a ---. . . . . e . . 0 - 8 5 -2 2 82 22 1 2Â£.e o M <.E-Ung Com nE O-0 O 0 0 4 W U) C --'. 1- 4- - U) < E M v - m m 0 Xw X 2 (D .C 6- (1) 0 L 0 (0 J C O ro .C E C C 0 X 0 (D o E UQ V 1 - C 1 #4 - w J .. , 0 c *U) ow En'E coc - 1.0 4, 2.b:~ U) 35 < E m E ME -5 2 2 CD -Â¤ a. . -C - -0 0 05 E (D mc 0 ro 0 =2=93 1 6- 1 - - ro :Cit., 2..:tl 4: ; 1....,1 4==32321:EE / WOON 1nuleAA *s6u!Plinq Buns!xe Jo eoueueju! uo eis leuosees eles npe pu PARK 1CE E R MASTER P should be in both sun and shad options f ir rebates, grant programs, cking outdoor spaces. and discussion proc , Texas Buildin a d vehicle approach and parki cleo l.loee Jo Xpedes Bupped e Lls!1 :einini elli JOJ Ple SUO!ssnos! pep!Aoid S! eoeds 6upped euo *Iluenno ni pue uoileluesel J :u6!Sep eALIp 01 SLUeeS leAOLUeJ MOUS O eP!Suiejunovy sleuejelll Meu eonpOJW! oj lueAA lou X 'elq!seei JSOO eJel.IM 'SUO!} 01 seem elo!4eA JOJ 6uiAed ileqdse Jepis eziseudule-ep 01 P'noWS #e}s pejeonpe Jeue 6upinooo S! 6uideospuel Jo uoileillepeJ 'einloel!40Je 4!u reness cards and standard design be 10 ,s what should be the standard; ree decks are most fl xib e.leuef Jo uoneiedes Joi sao ritical to redu ng resource d pedseJ jou seop e i no JO!Jelu! uo s6ol 'ueu 1 - seoeds eiONe 1 dxe le#eq ajeejo o} 6uiminq uosiller :ells uo sieuejew Jo sed*; leieAes Apee A; 2 uieisns seeie ueu uedsem eAO]dul! PlnoM ue#eq pue inisseoons :LNTSE pue JOJ pele6pnq eq lsnul S!41 :uo!10nilsu Alle,juejod 'sioloo Jo spefoid uonorulsuoo lie Jeue uo dn peAA Buils!Xe Jel#0 01 Jelil.U!9 Mool 01 Ue4AA spoue uoile/uesuoo eziwixe ,\1 -imodpue s deck/porch/patio sh oved atch other towards view '}snp pue eoueueluiew eonpei IleueA al.LIOS 'SBU! el# jo ioop kieAe 01 emip m peau elenie o Po06 eoueque JO j n 6upq ueo SJOIOO lue00 w flow shower Exteriors her actions. ding orientations shoul .le 6upped pejeiedes ep!AO.Id WOO]peq 40ee sanss! pue slule.45 yelleq >IJOAA 146!lu SieAAOIq lede40 epAH 1SOLU 841 Alqeqoid s! ue#eq pue pie U pelo*Oal 'Jelos '0!ellOAOjolld 'sBui how to find the best, ecture. lou s! 6u!Pl!ng u luepeoeid e se 6u!4!un e s! pue pezil!)n plnoWs ed Iaracter with ulp'!ng s,ueuuot Xidde 01 Buipues m!nbm Il!/V~ s6u!PI!nq euloS ulnesnvy 34 01 (eums) leuejew aseq Bu!PI!nq s lelUell,UOJ!Alle JO eOUel.I seinleal leinpel! 40-le joi ejeudoiddelsoul acl Xeul 6umis 6oi-,leH alqeuielsns pue uoile,uesuoo Jeliews AueIN o fixtures; bedding a detailed sustainable ould analyze existing efforts and t are currently being done ie Plank Siding is being used at Snow ; seems successful so far to maintenance, holds paint well, have hops, a PowerPoint show was o Need to consider long-term maintenance in pue le!Jajew eoueueluiew JaMOI ue mis lejaueÂ© elLIOS Jo suoillod lielus u! pesn Al pue IleAA dn pl04 01 wees su!qeo 601 " SuillseAA Jemod Ue41 JalljeJ 4S!U!J n onal technology. Recommen SUCCCi;lct'rting the style cisions as well as value in all materia s pinoo Xal# J! ejeudo.Idde eq Xew aoinose] pue isoo luo# anssi XeM s commodate s these items peueep eouo poo6 M 1Soul St JeeueA eumsp a.101/\1 e-stained material as well. eoueuejuiew pue >lool :pejuelueldill! 6uleq *peeile eje spolie lueJBoid ff housing replacement of 100 'sseoons e ule.I60.Id ell} eMeul u Ioneer and Fern : J,\!H"tilt -i - - -1 y - 1 - - _: ZE - 274 " f ' ' ' ' 0 - - VE T Â· 1 ; - 01 L , -- 44 -3 Ain=i<~ / 31.1 ' 1 . ... . . 11.712 -r C (D - -vE -62 f J m o (0 0 & -2 2. - 8 E & /5 1 > v C a) 9 E m G (D O>'C = 6 (D Z 16 18 v . 7- 82 39 a)-8 .5 Â£ 6 Ec m m M .8 16 2 R g 22 E E E m .2 & 10 m c 9 2 75 8 b 6,2- i ~ 1 ::Il & -c a 05 0 5 ch -- a) .6 3 - . C ~= -Â¤ 0- 0 m -No. O Â·*08%22% . E Â£ 2.= .bo 2 .8 â‚¬ -5 8 2 E g 0 2 5 5 = 2 -S 3 8 2, 1% Â§ +I > ~C - -- -16: & 05Â£ 2 le m .22 ~c e- 3 0 0 u, 92 Â·c - 0 -- - - - - 2 5 2 - ~ 5 ME @~% *2 -pm& S w~E 88 g22 1 9 4 g .2 5 5 *ME 022 2% m-NE-El, 12221*/2 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 v E 0.2.E (1) 5 o v .- 0 9, - 2 M' co . C ...7- i ME's :8-Es ME {@%228!3#-2 1 - 1- 0 C Â£ 0 -Â· m 0 .=16 & 5 2 5 & 2 atÂ·- go -cla,c C C c O + 0, * 32 9 W E !2) Â·9 2 4- 7 .0 r fo E tiz 1 = 2 - u, N 'S # 2 - lub= L ~2 9, O '05 19 - CÂ»(1) 9 E o .5 1.2 0 0 4 -1 03 d.*.EY .32 ..LE-11 v k a.16 % (1)-- (D (D S E :2 0_ :42 d E m 2 30 5 2 2 2 1 &1 1 3 qi 3 g % 4 Â£ g .0 ~ 16 Ec m m 2 -- 0 - 2 0 al K 1 -Â·52-4 - E Â® 32 m >0 (1) 0 -C ,_ 2 m.& O (1) O 0 wiG > 2 5 â‚¬ in 2' E f.-7 4- .A * 2 -5 .10 *, g % ~ E & 1.5 'E & E % 1 g !Â§ E E : 2 8 2 g E g .3 E 1 2 co m (0-0 > 0- E 4 ,6 5 6 0 s O a.2 --t m .6 2 E 85 f :5 % C 2 0 0 1 to - W O J o o M OB, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 â€¢t 3 - 0 (D (1) 0 .Di ZJ - .,U# 01 6- P) 4- = 5 m d N - 26 IS (D >,E S i a - Â·- - (1) 0 mc CO E N c v B 2 - 5 .e . 2 -C '8 m 2 0 - M I .I-:- O a. J O g & 8 2 0 C 1.2 0 J ho E m B 6- 3% RE g (1) m - 14 0 La C .C (D Â¤) 6 *2 2 Q x :0 2 32 - 5 - . - @ 2 19 0 2 16 i.% 2 1. 3 i - S 01 m - 1 .5 â‚¬ 5 cs) c 1 -4 ....2 O 5 2~91% ui 3&- Â·0 0 =i = C (.4 2 mca) 16 -C 0 0 E 18.82 .3 & 6 0 00 0 000 0000 1-000 IiI. O 0 22=5- 0 - .- 1 .C CD C O E Â£ O m m 0 0 â‚¬ (0 !=!m m :8 2 -E Z Z = 0 -5 Â£ 9 > o -Ci 1-2 ~*E~bgS g US -2 -0 0 - 2 0 & 52 2-Et / .2 2 -2 5 -5 2 -2 - O â‚¬ 2 (0 9 *Â® 52338.2â‚¬0Â·Â£ 3%2= k :E Y â‚¬ g E 2 2 2 2 15 0 - 0 Â·c e $2 â‚¬ r g) 2 c E >. 2 16 9, f,Â·9 9! 2 8292 .2 2 & N fE U) 0 3 Â·% 2 =:.a O (D * m EU O c 0-0 EZE . m Cl v m m c 0 2 4 m .9 E b g f 3 E 22 E N 0 2 5 -3 33-Â·iT- ~~ i & 2 2 v 2 2, E ..v a. *- O= -~ . :* -~ J ~ . E b} E hi v o vieE T R E ~1 E %,2 3 g .51 - li -@ 2 2 8 1 0 â‚¬ E # . .#62 ~fs ~ 8 * E 3 E -0 9 2 8 2 -R E â‚¬ a i 2 s i E # 3 M -~ fg # * ; 3 8 -0 -m ~0 ~ 4- 2 a f - â€ž - g 0 0 J C M a. 2 9% 4- :~ C 0 m <Z C C C Z Â· ~.:,Â·â‚¬.3 2O CO - C C 0 C C m v 6- (D 0 - J 0 a. . E .6 E hi 23 8 2- @ 1~~* P 2 PE S E P c U, S 8 (0 -o (1) - 1 M O 00 000 00 0 0000 000 0 0 CD - .1 - - (0 L Â£ - E & N .0 ~ 2Â£ C 0 0) CO CO 1 0 (D O - O - O U) 0 1 E C 1 . ir'. lk< Â·--Â·, Â·Â·â€¢'4,41103,2 'C ;I. IC|41$1|)44 /, 6-4.-21~- fli -: I. ~~~ r lj- 1 ~1. ~ - EFALM-i' F'-;' '-- '' I Lu eq pino ...ill'.t. -: ainini InJsseoons .Spa id ewos io, Alesseoeu eluOS ppe s6u!PI!nq Japp UO Slim Jaue] Reve e Genera on al conclusi s eing added. gh the master pl uoissnosia Buls!.41 nnect cabins - many are Outdoor fire rings and gas grills a make a loop or walk impacted by fire bans, communal Need to have mountain character Consider views to the exterior. tion for establishm 1!AA 'dnoJf Ileuls 41!el s! eseq JOU r old age group; g o ot views of the parking P ayg ounds, sandboxes, outd 01 s se Jou ei Ilel.us 6uisn o e e>lej o; pejeool slueld CENTER MASTER Ilt N of remodels. Cookout Areas Distinguished from char o Having nice product or nor funding on a lon - Interiors pa#ng su!qeo u! d!4 100-1 uo peppe rainwater. lell] 0106001!1 Jepisuoo 0 ssal s! inq Jepejewo sppe nt cabins and parking so that views are /access for elderly guests. of finish materials are used. eate a warmer feel. different colors; not ger being used as a -SJOOU JO SlleM le/,AOI UO pOOAA eoueuedxe el# Jo ped inq koleieue6 ins, i.e., bungalow u!qeo am ep! used as wood accent with Diverse 00 erings. ored outside of o I n need of gr Ing easily and is nced to be e Aluesseoeu jou - seoeideJU Buil.U pez!1!jn eq pinoo salils leinpai!40]e 'SAAolleas pnul 41!M enss! ue ale inq se su!qeo pue- lou op el oed Auew ue eq lou Xew 'Bu!Plinq eqj olu! s6nq ezis pu 's6uiplinq elll uo Ninq Jsnf Jou 6u nJ U! ls!sse Il!AA In 0. V 0-, 0-437â‚¬* Â¢ b L--- :'' /40 Er - A N k -2'.0 E 05~*s~.fo- .F - 61 ~0 17,6 14% 0 E- . 4 43 -1,0.1 12= U) C 4 Â»JIll ., .trgÂ·<Â·er Ler Â£ LIDâ€¢â€¢;Â£21 dE. :0/ ; N h.-7 - <1 2444 I C rt.* m = 8 0 - 1 " 4 .\Â»-4*\. 2# =3 . 1 - +Ve U 2 00 0 N: 2 U - as 1~ . IM: 71'04 M ~111 1 -f O.:= el li; 4.994;5:itifiligifi*rf. â€¢ 4 ,---------- N N Nel m Y *1- Neâ€¢>câ€¢~*000-0 - . - -Uri ..h 0Â® M<Ime 0144 W El El. 9No.er p,4 46)00 2~ .39. 51 vÂ¥~ X.\ I / 164.<a, 0.,e.i bLV, e,4Ulsic'.3 X22Â£9 â‚¬ ' â€¢ I *.-''gb1t~#r.<-25+1-< ril~-4~ 1 . - 860Â«6,> -- 2*" 2421-lf,1*3<.F % %9 E .Â¥ -iza, 000 : . 1 - \ \ '39661,7,*i':...--.EN ja-4 82Â£4/*dfji 0 '0 #474/TS#,n 20- 0 7,0 V 0 â€¢; râ‚¬ / 0 3 - 1 -1 . a' 1 , #h ' Â·Nwr-2 /5 0, 0 >44 31 - JA 9 "16.L,s-/ 3 i 008,/ n 2(6,5,~Jg332 4 4 .,- Â·4..3 4.-2.51 ~ L . 1.; * 977 to J '20 (SDI f 3 N~.72:33'.~ . C W,k V / Â£ ' '13 2 403 Â· 7).' 7/0 4, t,r. O 0 , 2,4/ 11 F-4, i . I o 00 4. 0 . \ 4. - 4 . CD 'et ./3 f ? *.\ i ./ -lie l - 4 . Sic:f 'XV 9 - - <C % 0 / . 0 4,7 Â° . ' 81 . 0 0 57. 1, 4*009. 0 -00 1. . 0, , 0.- . L 0. .. 0 0 ... 0 + O J \4. 0 0 I n I 2 U -~:er,rjl<&/32129+- - r.~n -9.41 %â€¢ . 4 -3 01 'Al/1 0 0 0294 '.L 4 0 1 . $8 O (Ma r C. . I % 0 O .- 9.3 7 N- LY. 1. % 0 . . : ' V ... for < C=:r , 0 , ty ,\1 -, 0 14.00 3 '- 1 /''b M. 0 00. ' 'L 1. 16 17:40? O,1-J (MAIU - lEi LA ' ' CA Â· 1*116~'i-la."-*i~ V 0( . 4 \11 0 0 8 1% 60 0 ... I e - . 9- '4 2 3- O Â°CPI 1. Wll /2 - -rf . e '0.0 0 lilli . =29'-4 45'to - 2. I 3.0 ... 6 f-/ 0 0 5, 00 C I :th ELD 0 r- . 00 0 - 0/0 00 I . 6[3â€ž4.~( 2 0- .,6 /f: 4 LJ 1 4- .: 'vu 4 4 0 4:'Â® ' O 0 'r, IAÂ£ o Id.... 0 . 48 k *. W . CO I .u l m. 0 v 1 7Â¥: â€¢ UP'vuW, 1~. .0 1 : ... 1 0 Â¥4 1 r'09-7 16. <47 3% 10 -0 0 -% . ...Al O D .0 ,./ ~-!L I . '* 4.,Â·'+ 4 *YA 42. ri;*/ LiÂ¢~3> Â· d D . -1 ' 1 1 e . . Â·Â·i n r p\.A e. 8-J .Â· 6 077Â£ 0,7 -5 0 - /Â· -iL.. ~20? p s . 4 . - 0 /-1.52=./ - .,4,0-" -: u . 4â‚¬~ N., m 0 9> 63- - e LL Y & I . *4 . I. ~ 0 0 * . f .4 50 -, 00.. 00 ....o 4 1 1. 0 0 00 0 0 /9 63 , . n ap/ 9 O -U 0 , 0- 9.4 f 4 -' .,Â© ,0 :SL &4,1 6.93.'#)*09 % (1. 0 ... - .7 ' R .. 9 -0../-- . <1 - 0 % 1 C Ob 3,1,2. '1*- --_r- 1. 8 4 8 2 .Â· ... r FÂ°* tq 60.- ~"* ~ . CA\ 0 ./ 0 O 101 1 . 0 W 0 . r-;5fAT< 0 L 421Â» 50 .OU "0 90%7 1 ~1 1. 104 0 . el#: I -0 r i N . .1 ff -1% '4. ~ .*m 8, I 7.w Â° lit G I . - g 0 0 0 04, 0 09â‚¬4 ../ 1 rÂ· *'' 7# - 09 1 r 0. 0 0 3 1 1-â€¢~ :F 9 0 <4 7 w . f .1 , 4 Â£ 1 . 1 A r''P 0 <NA-- ' rTT# 102 I Vot â€¢ j Al 4 PRÂ» / L ' 4, ' C RP ./1 il , 00' flal ,< ... W I. / A 91 b.% â€¢ .:.0 El / V. 4#.44&3~ b w -- 9-1. to 6 99 Itt :.=/4 /> 4 \4 Ar 1 h F ' 04-r / 1.0 - 0 4 0. %73 -# 45 I /*0 + .-"A . 97 t ~ ~ +IU:: 33 Al.0 2*5 06- I , 9 0. \L . p.,/b ; EXISTING BUILDING INVENTORY ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN YMCA of the Rockies 041 NO FIREPLACE WITH FIREPLACE Vacation Home Vacation Home Vacation Home nferen Cabin BR Rustic LEGEND 4~u jee; 002 L 001 00* 009 . . I. . . :,1 64 I , -. *.4. D M 41, I . 1 44 K 9 1,- AL/,74/68Â» ' I A LIC/6**M - tf .. .. r" - I ... - . 21 . 1, '4144â‚¬*,M -1#1~ 04 2. . f. 1 1/egf: tv~.Â· -:3 4 4 4712:LK Â·4 (ME p r f . I P -* 0 : #-* 04 e. 4 . . . I 4 0 - I. . I; .C ..f ' , 7 05 ./, - J r , t : Â·ar - I .1- 1. i.2 , fi 4 4 4 1.71,Â· 3 - - I . 4. ,- vi-di.1 .EMP/ 1 $ I ./ 76<A Â·:trf : .Almil.rill tty , 00 1. 1 - /1.ily& ' 2% 44 :c, M - ' 4. MJEC , . 4. 47* K , 9 .4 I ./ f ' 7~$ . /-4 , -. '7 , 4 â€¢a * r 94 , , e 1, 61,1 * 1 k . 1 ** d W - .1 - Â¢/ 7 Â· AA. 14 - - ,~**kit, . . 22~ 97-1 . Jkh ,6 4 , 1 1 . i .9:141*lijff, I# 4 1 ' 4 4/ , /4. L V W.*I rl . f ./+ I . 1 'Â£4'rz, . -4. . 1 f 48 1 1, 40â€¢Al 1 - . 41 4 9 ./ k/ 4 : ..1. 3 r. 1 40 . 1. '~ 0 - ..... .Â£ 1 "..1 Â¢#9.'' J . . 12Â·,9 i . 4 , , I, 4 I .t, r . r 11 ... .-,0 -1.... , 4 .b , 2 1% /,3 m V , ... . - 1 4, * 41 - - 1 r , k I . . % 4-- + i f & f .-*AM y ... 4,- , I. UL P / 1 . 1/*flf: . i Â»iâ€¢~-0.~~~/4, 1 : 1 . 4 8 -.*,1 Â· 31' â€¢ M- 4:k . .4, j ./ , S ... 1/Ti L / . .1. : I L. 1 ... . . -5 - 1 , â€žr J - r - Y- . . J, 1. I L - ~~2 .1. ' - 94 . 5.. E-~,~ :t r 4 . / 4, . -. 4 4133 1 'le; 3 Â£ M . , 4 WA.41* 4/ 1 r~~ 14. -4 r. h. -W ~ jitral/F 1.2.'L%LZ.., FY,2 4* - I ''. ..7* 2 â€¢L. r' :4 1 * 4 - .2 1 993/*"-' 4 %. â‚¬Ir-/. :, 12 4 14, Â¢04 * _H/*TeÂ· .697 z,Â·. t.4 =1 -, r . /1#F -cn . r r -1 . , 4 ...9 AQUff 14*,6.:1 . ' . 4 "P.' . I . ' te,k . . .1 </ - , le w, 0.1 0.4, 1 I. mkr,~C i f . A we 11 ,# I t. I - I, . 'k 14 I .t 44 . 9 , .- -- C. ,- 46 X , . -1 4 4 '3.6 f. 4 1.4. I , *441.9. . 1- 99 0 . "' L - - *4 1 I-/,2 3~3, .29-li-" + , .14&,/1 - V .6 .4 .. Ip. .. :/8 )*Pmfulg. 4 , :3.,0 r .72" 1.1 1 . - S -... = .> 7 - # I. :;A },9 2. A 17 ~: --~IK-y *% '' ./ I f 9/7 ,0,* j : ~ ir-: ir 0 - I. r,/Aff . , , 4 . - r. e 99.TAL# , -"-iritl D I . ' >72114â‚¬.-..- I - . I I. -,47.1 . 6WSÂ» :. - / ' ./ W:flf t 'f 44# 2,~r~~*'qi **L,~1 .:9* A 01 : A 3 4 7 .1 / . _ .11 t ; 0 /' 4 1/- '9 J %. â‚¬:44 .A Â· I. ... b . e - j , 1 /07- . Fli'77# ~1 Â· I/:119)Â¢1 2.72 - ' , ,Â·v V.irl Â·r . 4 - 4 . Â« 1. .3 , .: â‚¬*-2 ,> '- - /43 / . f. I 74- I Â£ H,ph#gle: H . 1/ . 9 , Â· 40}} ril,t~2;' P,# 1.- . 40 - a - 46Â» 0. 8/2 1 1Â· 1'1(,3 *,,-1 ~4~ik i, fri - )7.41 ' =.a#*0,~~~â€ž ''ill. .4.Â¢ t.41. '..i ; -44- : - % 1 , --....,IR.. . f . U*0.r'. 1 4 , . r--â€¢ * /1 4. 4 2 0 1 1 ... 2W:J , - I . I 4 j' I . 0.-Â¥-1 1 '' . . .4 - 4 *EW r N C .p .A . 19 ae Â£ 6 + Le - - 0 6 1 9 9 lili , .dri~ Ar-q:=------ Z 4,1 . 8 -e U f.*>â€¢-Ic\./'. e . ' I : *...1 . . ?1 1:. .r- 4'R.2. 4,7 1 % 1.Il./7 / 3"* -8-Â£4 - < ~i# ~A ./*3 4 .2 'NA- 0 *17- 1 , 9 :i. .A , a .. . r TS* ' - - j..'I- 22/ le 1/-4 6 *.2. - 41' 0 4- ->ACN...vr-- 44% .... JB- . . ..... 9-U ,-- W..I-Il:~ Il ..- 465%21\ 2 . 62 4' f 1~ -. Ch '94Â»4Â¢f~L 14_--4.4 'Â·,915 8~ - . W - 3 U -*,30, b 1, 1 i 4 'LE . 1-0.0 .. 00 11. -M .51 . 4 r 1- .7. i. 2,1 ./ . ./il:t , /J Â®4- 97 1 a 91- 'Pr.1 J t. = 14 -. i ...70-- e, . .i % 1 - 0 'TMI & '. 4 I 41 .A r. 1. Â£ 1 -1 1 0 1 , . .. * 1 f .1 7 a . 1.- â€¢ 2 1 Z.-3 ' 'â€¢ 1/11~ 4'â€ž i , N- I 1/1#1 . Â¥ ......t . 1. 40*' S . Il .. ./2.....6 . ..1.1 1Â£3Â¥*71/ f . .1 ,+ ' Â· 1 2 1.6- 1 ., *nUU I-- - mlmkwilillil:f,4,#:Ya .. I 1 .Â·mnek- 9 I &7 m _ -- L - 'L, - 'll . ,Â»fl , 1 1 4(X. . . /4 \ 4 k '1% 1 - . 0 .. .0 -) 0 0 4 54 1 4 .. -4 44 â€¢' iL - r . R C F .. . . 4 1 9 .4 .. I - ... .1 . . . . ...11 ... . #RIB, 0 . 1442 4, . ; ' a, '.4 . . . .. . 0 , 9/6 . 1,1 - . . ; i .. 2,1-'Ilt I //17"'4/=*ar 11 '\t 'U . lul ..... 'B ' 6.-i ... ... ./.7Â·- 4 1 1 Vit. ,. 4 . I â€¢., - 'll ./I ./ 7r-/ ,. â€¢ 4 0 9 . ,1. . . , - .... 1 " ,-'" t "1 I +11 A 5% . Â¥9 I .... I. , 1. .14. . . '\ , I. r f 5 #PA . . , r - Â·Â· .&,0. .1 '' L. , .- . . I I.- 1 <i .- I '.4-Mi .. .. 4 j 4. 1:j . . to, -- -i---I ..... 1 ./ -4,6 .. .\ ~~9 7~'k 1,j/bf/3.P / 1 . -6. ... 77 1 1 .,a .* *lke # * ~~*: . . . 1 19 1â€¢ < ,~ ima 41 1 ~1/A - . .I - - . .. U A-,vt r * . 0 - - 1 . 1, 0 1 T 4 1 4 - 0 2 + , . . . :- a. U S R I.C. H f , it 1 ./ ?Asi - -, ,... '/ 4 / f - 1. 2 t.4 4 - ' ' .. , 1 1 .. 42 4 â€¢ f . -1.-1 ~f~~;~~0fj, ~~f. a, ,", .il , g e 4 ? ga 2.7 + I 1 144\ / -I - . 51 iriES 11, '4 . 4 - I. 1 %:4~ - - 4 -L % i ~ 4 W \ 1- +'-1 - .i.1-1~ 4. ."/.1 \\ SLOPE ANALYSIS ER MASTER PLAN YMCA of the Rockies adols lueoeJd , 1,3, 4uou lee; 008 L 006 0 00Â£ 009 006 ..1 r *# . h#.13 g Â» %1 0 *91,2 1.- CD -0, cm If ' I - ..3 . t--ir 166 : It' .12.. 4, IR#*y': 1 -1 4 6, e 4 fi r f., 2 00 ~ J.1 94* 4 0. 1. 63,1 M '4Â¢ 4 0 , Y: 1 3 4.. . 4 . 9 i. / '. -4 . ./,* 9 -iFil Â£ 'r,1,/- . Â¥ 2,1Â· P â‚¬ R ,<*:1- pe u / 2 96'r ; 39 .aa. -,f Ck 0 7 . m 4, ...' . f j EG & - 5R1 .assÂ·. Â· .~ 1.f + .: 0Â¥ 0 .c XG O LU C ~Ai, .1, 40 35-,4,0 + a . 0 1....4/ 4,4 Â»4 .4 i - ]11: & *- 0- 0 ~~7 Â£ ~ ~3~t~ 0 ..3 2.--*af Abm.t - - da A-, t. 2)0 t. -~1.9,1 btio'~Au. , 26. ... =64\â€ž, . r / 1...Ii//644/..-8 U =alr 0 '62.47 /930 , 1 1 --- - =,9 -5 - -Li' . UP;4 -ti@' . ~544. = 7~ ' c i v - to Â·OF 3 ., 0. 0 .dit,&22. ro ~6% 2 1 - b /.1.6â‚¬ + 18Â¥~ I ,~ / -E gl .=f. e =*.- :412 28 41 1."Fl =ib Mi~i. . 46,/Wimi . ,r- I -.#Ft< - *'. 12 - . I. $ / /2 )12/1~1 -- . A-. Egu 1 - 462%#401* 72449- -4, -â€ž- 0 1 4 01=%' 8 .g, ..Uk li!~ ue....ROÂ©Â£101. 1, '1.28.6-- illk. /94/le Â¢bir:,P % 7/r9"Ers.dil lilljitlk :.9 941"9;/Illims : . I- (Dll Ill/Mid//P 0 a . . a..t .Jib.1/ SYC . -1. /4 L E....9-3/. 1 -UDGE . 6 -- /41 U}Â® ]!i~ -311""U E 1//#./1/f-' 1 r,9. 'I id- ~ 0 ' 8/ah. -2 a 1 1 Wnuil- i.~:.1/4 Jil . ---r- 6 ~mak - 6 r 11 "19/.r=/.il,fl 62/0 Jp :ff~ , : 1 206 & th ..1 4â€ž4 1 1 I lt, A- Pt *Alic] 610,!3 a = 1 .1. .T 9 . Â¥ 4. N j R. ~le CD I E AE SEE " 4 4 , 05 . ' # . --I- - I. 4.- -Â· 4 - I I . 4% I I. I ft . . 9.2 - ft -, 4 6141 ..23/4 4 , 'r.- i I Â¥4 4 :giliHillit 7 I . I e'l~i . -4/22.2 .9& 9 I & 1 *19// 4 1 I 0,9,3 4 Â£, 0 r i t *, A * ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN EXISTING COREAREAAERIAL Entrance 4Pou -198; 081, -e - 8 -29 L 01~ se isters le Fifth Tenn k 4 MCA of the Rockies 1& 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Â·Â·rfic-,"1Â£*Aze,<5- 1 4,221 -'. 1-05,' .. dmil *44â€ž~ : r.3. , 1.t> i I. ta rub f' 2 0 ..... 1 Â¢0 U) Z, 3/. 4 21. 4-Il . I. o ~7 n.) M /<9' 1.1.* i. /1/SH. .*. -2~ 1 1 7, \ et . . 3 06 1. r ,* 4?k 1 f i Uk 4 + , 2 - :,~ 3 1 02, L ..49 - % ipX A + b V 1 IlÂ¥1Rt' ( 1 . ' ' 0. ill '22 :9' 1 'b . G .. 11 . lit< RÂ·,i AZZ..2 /. .2 :f: . .47 / 114 .t .. . -r .44 , 4?4.-,u- . L /9, 4 4 t<Alle'.Fr . Â£3(#< bon ..43 e.<I. 0 : 0. -2- p 4 .1 --%0 . 4&444 .3. $ 1 ,/ 1 -.1 21 4 49fi. 9 U 1~ .. . 4 41 2 . 4. e. 9. 4} . - 3," 1 4, r & 1 44 Â¢.0<i. .-Il -dal i....=... I Z&.5, ..il . : Â» Â° e. t. I - Â«25~ 16. - i 4- :64771 4 - 7,4. . .1/ 9 9 L. 1, -14. 19 . \ -Uik-14 .0-1-1 . 4-f ~1 â‚¬ ill 7' . .Â» i .7-â€¢,Â«24Â¥ Irx,â€žcia D . -.4 il WE'.b ... 0 92,-1622-- 4 '9 ': .,f U I + / .f .14 1 -'.3-.2. / D . ... . -0 Â· .e % p .... <--frj.. 4 2 v . 11Â»â€¢/ 2-144. f:* Â· 0- 0- ,Â£ 0 , . 45 0 P -21 L fl----6 . 4 ... -4 -=~ ...3, 6 /53;;:4\ N .. /40 . 4.,~ \ .* v /.2:.21 :r . ,--Â· h443 6\ f 1 .. '. . %11 .5 1 . Â· t. r.. .9.â‚¬.8?%-.1 / 4%e Â¢ . _r - A Â« --2--0-Â»L <LAI a -\,4 1 EERfr~ A..f ri T~ 4 . . 9*1'2*2,7..1 . . ~ t;...1 0 t~~/1~**~~-I~4 1 yett 1 ./â„¢K-, 139 : ..... 0 ..'.a . 9,4 . .L-' /2 44. I~ 74,7 n -EÂ·- ,~2 3 -~hzÂ»z~ -7 2 Â»-Z.-2 ' 2 2-0 4 1 ME i,Â» (lf pl 41-6 y 6. 432-:522 fri 0 '11-141 11= m \9) h LG C.~. C ...05 1 9-62 2 ( C 9 1,4 th,~7 <, ,=3 2 0.9 4 J D . ... , *t 92< * ' It 9 1 taf v "Fl b j *T TFT ' . 0 r 4 5 + *93 . -- 4 i - 7 .. 1 2 X .< Â·fl y- R , 75: 2 1, *~..$.4 1 l . 3* \: 4 E 48 4&. 0 0 a 02. 09 ..to 13 ' 1 1 /1 4 = 1 - '42- *Oft- 2 < 844 -74 15 t..-- i ' Â® M . > 01 :*ap )' .t:L --1 4- â€¢ ..1/- C.â€ž-3 G.@:1 1 9.h A 14.1-1 1 I 'l l ...Â·L *00*0 0 OVERALL MASTER PLAN ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN <MCA of the Rockies - See Enlarged Plans erald Mountain (RMNP) The Summit nlarged Plans Core Area Center 4'.:it~ Ap,~S O!JolsÂ»1 uo!1!Aed 41.lou Jee; 008~ 006 0 00Â£ 009 006 ON)931 *Jepunog *pedoid --- SU'qeo uo!unaH Family Cabins Infill Nature Center lede40 Joop}no Uln!Jequ,nioo BuisnoH uels ~ , J.4,~94 Â£ . *U.-; 4 '4; 4 t i,0 mir * ......... 6.4 & .... t. U .* th 3 ..: ~ â‚¬ 2 ' 17<i . *, , E..S.>~ B. /4 . E:. ..6* 4 P., 4 . ' .4: I #44 5 ... 4 . . -1 J . . .. t. I I . 1 4 4 *41. 4 4. Â« , .4 46 * .1% Mr 9- ' Â·~4 10.4 â€ž 04'?r Â·1~4 1 , Â· - . N , 4 0/ 1 ., 1, n , - P. - . 4 *; , Â·54 ' a 4 ' - I . 4 L . I -\ 7 --4 .. Â·u,#bi + . -1 r.4 % , 14.- 5, 11 . - .. . , 1, 1 â€¢ . 1. I . /4 0 t ...p, & 1 V 4 It , 0 ' 1 9; .,< i ... P' - 5 4 . 41 0 .. .. 0 29 . , b . I. 0, . . ....-..1 0 . '*t. .. , . . '0 5, 6% , 60~ 1, ... -,7 Â· ' . 4....4 2.. 0 4 â€ž . 1 j .JLA ' I ,m,â€¢-4 ..... ~A/Tf4 .â€¢â€¢ KÂ· tÂ· :... * , 49.M.$~Mt *C*:L.. - .. .l . I. ./. .â€¢ 1 .... , 0, 0- 222:= . .9 4, 1 I. ....1, 0 IN./. - :4 W. . . 9..4 Â¥1- .1 .. . t. $-Il v- I . 4 : I I . .1, . b . J . . ... ... 40.8--. , , I , ' r :I t .0 - I gl' 1, / re - 't- 11 . , %%4169 I . & 1, : . I ' . 1., '49 * 1. 0 , 1 .,Â·.,r " . * - / 36Â·. 21Â·+ fr Â·41 ' 4/ ' I.' -' 1. . = - =* 2 2 9, 2 2 1= g v v.2 F g,Of : .Ill 0 0 W 1 2 6 9 2 = X X~ 2 2,2 Ul UJ< a =11,1~- O c 21Ij '1 1 ~ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN TRAILS MASTER PLAN 4*Â·luu *de, UUÂ¥10 Uub Dul: Uln, Uub id AIUO-U 09â€¢: YMCA of the Rockies *,epunog *pedoid eoeds ued aN3931 Cy 0 fil ~~th ~ -- <5-*~#627 - " , a - < .(D 0 --/ ~ i J %E .4 2 11'QI 3 1 4 0 01%~ h -f it t 2/2/h w A-'. 4 01 2,&::S=:=:r. ~ 4 .. F~ar<zgfi IN r )909Â¢ $ 4403 . 4 (10 3 0 0- t..31 . ill , 0 1 5 /h 0 2 if EZLE . C= ,Â· 1 IC . f i=. _ d 1 9 4 .'.1 f 00 1 4 -10 0 - 4 44' 449 : a. P 8,eque#â€¢M 9 LJ, LIU \1 - a>.0 Â© ti Sm Cl J n a , 1,~ ' 0 1 â€¢TH aEâ€¢ Vol U, e .- 2'- 25 1. 4, W . .,0 \P=iF=EU .1 .Â©*/ + 0 9#090 , 1.-i . 5 rm, Ne iD .V. t - 021 *ES / 6 k#** 5\%4 7 *t 1 0/ Â¤ 42 044 0 \Bi r * > f 1 - 0 UP i %- 1 -/ .1 AI .9 . i a i LE' 900 - g , 8 - 13 .01 --1 0.3 4 61. 0 [33 88 e U C=,0 \ M e, -9 , l.ly ,aa . - 0 CO - 0 #* 0.- T < i n C '.- 0 0 1 k#o 2.3. 6,Â· Fle 944 4 0 / C 3 5 15 1 ri 08%4% B Â¢j ~54Â© . r, I 48 9 7 '9%Â· \0 + 7- i r E b. 2 0 0 > r.- -0 2 3 n 0 4- - .+ I .1 0 n 1 8 0. le Â· . -O , AÂ· - 5 3 = E -.A --- Al 4 42 gâ‚¬ 0 - .2 . 49 2 ' '-l 40 0 -0 41 1 9.1 0 1, t. 4 Â· cl U g f 00 10 C 3 9 8-t--I- - ta , 5 , 4 - -1. . C Â« 1 13~ <2 /3 0 9 - f 2 U. = . 4-\ . 0-1 i 9 4., 1 ./ 1 L . Eu OL a ANg 61040 3 e \ e 6 4 - r h 1 18 4 V.14- â‚¬ 0 iii 7 u e de 09 B 24 [9 O 0 S 1: f 8 0 e - 0 P ; h 6/4'',1 *-4 Y,O .R i. 1- CO 0= f A 0- E / . 1 le 11= 1 VU LAND USE MASTER PLAN ESTES PARK CENTE ection 091. 01'Z *Â®1@e **Â®48 Memorial |~<Museum ~ eANG episuie}unov~ JOP!1'03 Uelliseped Illil Gathering Space aN3931 101 Bu!)Iled 4!1!oe:1 eoueuejuieIN --- uoge.Ils,Ullupv ~ 530!AJes ;SenE) I LUeJBOid I Bu!5pol lsene ~ BulsnoH Uels ~ 1 aoue,a,uoo ~ &,~S punok'-JeeA * puno,Bdweole 6uisnoH 20 Â£ O -11 lum . r.. ..Â« 4 4 - '' 01=253.IL,Al.3 o M t.0 4 . . 1 1 bc.. . 2 0 e , 'M- . TT---1/-,--, a lie Ad./1 - .*1 4 -4 1, --4 . - ~. =10 4 â€¢; i . J f.. : .0 1- o.' e w .110 - . d . I 11 .*47 2 2 .' I .29.z Fi . i&061 .7 2hd %0 t 1 1 3!f ....1 * 1 ..- 1 1. .mi~/3 Z . - --L .dia r. r--4, U ./ 31.Flm +3 a-W - S\:SC. s r b 4. I - ye Miff. 0 - 2 2- . 5 r 8 4 rfI~1 0 Ee , 33 2 4 F 1 LE' 1 9 7. ti 2-/ % Sonic 74 7. ZE m a Im W e + UR 1 771 4 ' ~~,1.L J 0 = . 1 â‚¬ '- . O, Â· 0 Ard m' BE .. '. Â·* 4 ika, : 36 4/I ./1/Jd' 34 /,1/ : 7-% 5 5/T. : .1 ..Ab.>,/ 1 -13 1 d -2 1 S Â· - 4 .0 -- ....... ' 4. -JA y .. fi. . 0 4.4 a - '74*14,- *al 1 ..1 . t \ 1Â£*=51 1.- . 90 #40 32/ 230 > 1/ -- -- - 4 .. . 4 Â£â€¢Cta . 3 M . le, . - . I#' . I -V' 10 Xy . - F #*Il-.- 1 4 0. 7 4. A. (11 1/I) 7 1 9. Â· A'fl e.Wy I .Ell / -T /4-*i 0,~ 1- 4 l O 2'20â€¢farl.,a. - k 0.0 4~41:me2 ~.XM~-I,f~Apl 1 -e- F + Â·Â· A 1 -'' - v Â· ~~ZEE-. iÂ·- 9 ,-12=,240. 1 h t. aj 12 2 S 1,4,4, 14â€¢ 62- .,7,4 T 2 . X i 2 2 2 1 - E 10 W> 10 5 2 U = SE. P af: 11: dist : i ,. e: i i til f 3 = i flfÂ·=3 2 ~ &1 838 383Â· 313' 1 3.Bii %853329:1,1-= egi i:.i @Fla *: M zamaged@dehH :' 3 =1 E.:t-=80 -EZM 1Â·3 826 .fill - * 5 w,251=Â® a v *,Eeou~miextâ€¢â€¢-0026 2',gE#=85,2,21-*g illiEÂ»,0: 1i*B: .Â°53113;gaZigiÂ£8223Eladili1lill:==m~gialit~: aa:iE 1--================~=============ugg===4===m====== ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN MASTER PLAN Summit Entry irect Main t~n~e CA of the Rockies Pedestrian 2 3Â° Activities Center 111003 09-BU!6 IleH Buiuia pue u,nuo;!Pnv 40sen Bulpling Sue, uo!1!PPV SUV 6 alk w/ ulnuo,!pn uest Lo ging Cabin litilt & %84 56 E i c N) 1 * W Â» &_ I . 4.J - .y U ... 14,1 d -4. ' / ' I. - LSÂ·.142*11/9'.-A 1 + 0.1 4 1.I FAM)/Illi.A . - , 0 .4 4. 7*4uo11gM__ Mi 1 I. bah , . $ 2 I .%1740' O 4 - - -=13,~, 414<gur' t,- z 1 -111'... 4 i. p - . . 41 ON jaâ‚¬ ./ 4 - r-= E 0 0 M--1- i * 4 1 I < eh_ 4 80 ... 8.1. Eo /'9 1 0 L--16_-1 Rd . . 6 f Ell I I L g â‚¬ 4 0 a. -- O.1 .4 .p-i.\04 *r .. k --9.7(11 314 4%4, , - 1 7-,1 ----4-. 4/M.*.46 40 /9,1LE*r 1 19 4 - r., 7.2 19/ f.,1 .~6 4 171: -7, k. ..5,~, i=m 4 -,~ - , 011) -m w* 1.- f,& . 81:Â§ w~2 8 1 0-0 44 4 - r-1- .2 "E - .... Uttij a. . o 0 ES . - 0 321aa- Q.=e [t- a -- g NATURE CENTER ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER PLAN eoue Emergency { Overlook YMCA of the Rockies 923$3 01 06ejois 41/1,0 uo!~~~~ Central Ue@Je 94 '1 2 ; 4. 4Pou le@J ORt 0*Z 08 091, 0Â¥Z Bu!,Ind .~ Bupelnee Outdoor Bu!,04*eD eoeds Corridor ~ /M~eAA@PIS aoeds er.& 2 Er 8 Â£ 2 12 ro Z = N ~5 Â° ro 35 ~f m (D -O Q tJ 4 22 I Â·~ 5 -Â¤ 2 82 F c v C .iii 43 -8 ~ --- 2 =5 2% O 0 0 2 cd c i 5 -71 Â¢0 -C 4 2 (1) C C L N -0 b L (0 - a, a) . a) O (D (0 E & 2 U) ~ C a) E 2 Z R 2) 2 E 00 0 -a (Dco-6 %22-C'. O L al &1 ir- im 6 2 b 0 2.2 U S~E WO =gos c 4,16 .6 73 2 16 4-. .. - 72=:L T (10 TE:E CE 52 0 2 u a U, O, .- 0 0 -Â¤ a) U) S Â¤) 0 -1 12 N E g .DS C Â£ 31 -2 - m.- U O d) Co -- .!21 -C, â‚¬ ro : D F % i .E- -2 1 i 0- -cmE 2% W (0 -Â¤ ME (0 J U) o 4- 0 -12 O 0 Â®2 o J 3 U) E 83 56 '- a) 4 C} (DEge . C 1: 7 EN - E .0 (0 (0 E m 0. t< J Â·- E = 2 0- -35 16 E .52 2 2 9*E Â£ ent; 0- 6- L c OÂ¤- .t -Â¤ (1) 0 a) . .C -0 2 H- 4 -8-2 - (1) r a) C 0 0 (D - E 22 COL C- >200 0% O 0 2 - 4 u ~ g 0 -0 0 %2-= 0 =22 2 1-* 1-% 2 2 8Â£% * f O u) U) v J 0000 1- 0 0 (0< 1- O 0 il O .05 0 73 ~22@ LIZ: 44* -0.-~ j..I.-72/A. 1942 Â£~ .\, 9,47 --4% 1 -4 - 4. W &)h Pa ili .125-1 jÂ¢.Ii/14 L-~Â«4*~ ~~lâ€¢let..1 Â£ ---1,32/: deÂ«8#2412;WEIRCF - ~ 4.-49/'* id, - *24*Alâ€ž-41 I'll'll"""Ilip:*242'llok.kg'/1/Imi .4.15-6 -11~ -ciall........291./.1 - I -==..t 73- a" 1/E- â€¢- U - /*tr 230-,IL. ~3'Fi-* 7~ â€¢A.* 40 9 1(/d~/f%~~~AVW%-- *Â»A~-- -â€¢tÂ·â€¢'~ a %11%Wl 1~~~Â» ~ ir: Le<18 232 .friwl'C 74 I /5-- 6- 0 I (D J C C O C 4- ro 18 b L 4- C E.N .. C C E0 CO (1) 0 6 11 C= C C (0 00 - .- 162Â£/1 6 - 2/La/'ap'/,F .;.4.9~ . I - - -Irraw - 1.-tt- Development of an overall organizational structure no guiding master plan, so lan and facility uses Utilizing an orga~~~of~Istructure based on land mework for master plann velopment. It YMCA of the Rockies are very disorganized, creating tional MASTER PLAN 4.1 MASTER PLAN LAND USE the site and its facilities, which meets the p )als, was a critical first step in the development the master plan. The existi sit ils and pen Space Master Plan Izil=Yrs foofrfahc~'i~lue~~~nd a co Clarify the site's functional relationships. Develop a clear "front of house" and "back of I area house," leading to higher visitor experience. open Group like facilities together, creating operational and organizational efficiencies. uoileinoip ueulseped pue o!#BJ J eouequ3 0 seilillieJ 'eoueie,uoo - sdnoif Jesn eleiedes o 'Se!} ueld Jejsew elll ez!.leulluns selqel 6uiAAOIIOJ elll el# sjoidep ueld Jeiselu esn puel ell} pue 'sesn puel 5!sep pue 6u CENTER MAS developed over the Center's lo uses and their r o Enhance accessibility. sieuoneoe/\ pue e41 JO }SO e 'sao!/U *suoiwool peuueid Ilan drawings are This section is ctions: the maintenance facilities, in g the Summ lo junolue isa me 'duleo Xe seale u oiwejoei p eeie 0!Jioeds eJe ese41 pue mis eqi m SluelueAOid 41 u! pepnloui aie SUO!}epuell,Ul he Perimeter Site is the ar 11 Master Pia o uao ell l s! ee,V master plan inpei!40Â·le NÂ¥ld Hal.SVE VahlÂ¥ 3BOO .r-Â«C .:93/4.-1 I e.4 b -2 r 12-2 +~V + 2-u ..'2 . f 241.=Ill .i2"/ -- Ul Â¥ 7 1 0 Z -- -- - 09 . if U) E 5 8 3 ., O @ Y (1) 1Â¢ 6.C 55 :g C O Xc a .. 0 .gu) E .boo -2 1 -a ..2 2 - C .0- ~ 2.2 E -8 i 6 -2 & u) $ % C 83 2%32273 NeÂ® ; E K b = O Z JIct E Â£2 ov .65 -G u) 2.- 8Jxxu, u, 42223322*E~ 0 E M Â£ R~ .5 73 5 .. (D 4. U) a (0 ~ O -2 2 v Â£ 03-5 c ro (1)2 W J ro 22@571ggg&&982%1Â§%%%%%02 b o .=!LLI<OU)=O-1> L.LOCU-LOCJMEOOU)(/)0fa.OGCDOU)(00(/)O<0 -220f ~m co .O 0 -ci (0 -O 0 -6 0 + co Â£5 0 -Â¤ (Ii ..2 0 2 co Â£5 0 -Â¤ (13 co co co (0 -Ci o -Â¤ CO .ci R ~ D E co .ci o CO U) .0 = 0 m m rio 1.1- 4 2 U) 3 + CD + U) Â·2 C :52 f C m (D c u E ; O 9 2 -0 2 18 15 g Â® 0 m J J Z J CD n O LL CD m 91- 1.0 co A 00 A- EL ' ' ~'t .Â·b ~i--'41 1-Iff lzE ....7 1- 1 19 44 ESTES PARK CENTER MASTER@ N eAissed jo eoeds uedo se peklesuoo eq 01 puel eds uedo 0 L MCA of the Rockies MASTER PLAN LAND USES alqedolaAap Jo seaie pazil!1nuou -lo pazil!111 e doleAepun L L n + information Ic/day use areas spunoiSduleo (eA!184$!U! areas Istrativ services ooms 5u!deeyesnoll/ hibit areas hitheater SU!qeo UO!U sieÂ»es ' 1 30Uefe}UOO 6 Su!)pede~~V~ufNCE esinoo S CS'!e#) esn uogealoe l.m~tic~s ent plants, etc SE/AREA Lodges istration 6ul)lied pue speoh' El Staff Housing r -r Ct- t. 19 Er 34 Â· Â· 4 ./ 11 -,1 Â· 24 1- W 0 2 0 2S 33; 91&U O T./.1 i Z >- -' J E (D @ 5 ILD-2 23 too WOO Zoo co 21 ; '~ U) 0 . 0 0 14 0 r/-9 - 92 .93 .92 -93 .92 .92 .2 -2,7 -i - D .'Â§ d 0000000 en CO % eo ro % fo U. LL U. U. LI- 1-1- U. U,u,U, +++++++gg C 16 2Â£888. 8888888=,6 4, a) % H -0.8~Â£ -22.9 c 9 9 9 9 9 9 a, 2 2 k 03gâ‚¬ 82=ZZ=222 E ZEEE@ 1 -i R I -. 4.. -0 2132221>2 2,2, 222 2 Â®222 1 .% .6 5 6 5 E E E .E :25 :25 :25 8 0 62 g> 2 F'E E 'E ME 5222222228888:000.0.0-00<05 i 3 3 edo e W f~t~ lEo<<<N <<<<<<<(44Â·9299<<<<<<<<<< 66 -42 ... .1 Â» .4, -,ClgZZZ,9 ZzzzZZZ"%*AUZZZzZZZzZZ 28 A O 0 :i= %' 5 00<<<< <<<<C<<C< <C<<<<<<C<<<C 1. 2@ENWZZZz ZzzzZZZ09*N.ZZZzzZZZzz tu 7344 2'33.m r.j .. 5% 2 .- g - 01 - 9-,-4-0(NI--r" ~ 21 21 lo --- 0 0 0- 3 i . & 8 g 03 *Aggo:ggn:832 0-Â·O 0 0 Eva - - - 0-0 no-~Sh#hN.N.M.6 0Â¥mm.982888 - m 94- O 0 Lo (9 - .. CD .-(9<00(DO(001-1-1-010, COOLD a e Q.Mot - .- p '- CO .- r .- ..12 < 0 1.1. 0, -39 M ,*- u,1 12.Eur .. 1 i 1 6'r O 1~L ..&. 4/ 2 1 #32 E 0 t. . 4*41 O - Â» Y -1 V - 7 i C .1=4" 0 1 UJ E CD f 1 GS+J Z 'f Z o O.6 ac lu CE 5 3 1 t O 0 --t O Â® 8 2 E & 2 -2 1 06 0 - k Â®EmE E @ E f =c $ C -U .Â¤ Eo-5-9 O C @ 2- 3 ; tab. - 2 0 1 3 9 1/12# 8= Â· car Â£ * g 3 8 1- Z M Â§ 22,2 &+ 2 n -6 9 0 (D rE CD /0 2 11 :5 10% 5E .- g, e u' 25.23 ElÂ¢ 16 1 9.; E Â§8 1 3- E 22 : 8 (0 -9 e-- O m C~*982 1~ 0= ;pE,~g*%88~t~{ 1.~~i ~if SE 111 000Â® M. - $ Sto â‚¬ 8 6 2 2 U 8 3 0, LE g g g O LL 0 1 (1) r b (0 0 02 c 0 41) CD 2< 0=2@rai#%*Sil~ fi#f@Â·8 243 ZI 2 1*//4 2 ff, 223 8 Z Bil.1-; O.-J-JZLLOWj 2 2 8 2 2 2888 6 8 & 0 2 7 : .~ L.L. 0 4 0 E 12 0 2 EC 2 .- O - 1 CO -92 2Lv A fo 0 - -- 6 5 5..g 5 0% 0 8.3 5 C m .22 - m o ZEÂ£2 Â·t --~ ~ c .2 o g d) gat 2 02 E-2 .*2 e ('3 8 :25 5 .6 2 E Â® 9 0 1 Â£'# E 2 = L. u. 1 // E - Z 2~8 9-08Â§=ni =2@ (, m ER @Y J :3 0 7 ,1 2 8 2 2 & @ :4 2 2 0. 2 1- ~ [f 2 1 v - .e E E :.m m E 8 -% 2 . 1 2 -GE -~- ~ i22/ 5 $ 8 5 2 4 5.9 -C b o m C c .6 -Â¤ 4 - = .= A v ui F Â° 16 @ - -a U) t: 22=2 4 U C (D Â·- v EE.2 a) Egg 2 2- Â¤) O %@~3* Z 5 9 -8 2 % E (D I . Em i .25 0 ~ -0 2 ~ g. 0 g - a)<E ffi fUL J 0.- 1 -10 8 0) F E Z 82 (D (1) 2 : 11 EL Jf Mi li - 7~ 2~ J m i S E E EL " m o C a) Otc; : 183: p.. ~ - CC -.- -=- >- m 098=bed,k .c -O - -Â¤ a) 3 2 b m Q g N o 0 E /6 -C - Ul Ul â‚¬1'22- v = 1% cng:.6 - a w 3 m 2 9 E.&*358 - ------- = u 92 A a) ki .G 18 d) C 1- 9 1 Z, .C 0- U) M c u m 2 ~RE UCC 7 b O 8 2 E B M .2 Y 8 ~ N 22 4- U) =aw-c 2* .C I #00 22 1 .~ - 0 - C â€¢ O . 33 c .- -O 15.ow itul 0 22 .2, 2 =0 t o o E q O C i W I - . 0 U U) - 0 0 -0 0 0 C 2 2.3 0 -92 -. - JO U) 4- m I (D ov 73 OC n m m 00 2& 2.92 ~* g* =&2:022 cn - (D O F - E 92 -0 J P .5 0 -&. 7 (0 ==-1 - .*Ng R M E 'O W.f!! c g M. 2 & o a) ... rn o .52 o .1@ a v 2Â¥2 33~13& **S - ~D t.3 (D Â·g u~ .g :~~ Evt:-2 23-au EE M.9 2 .9 1 t.3 ~1 - N o E 2 E 2 31 Ec w 3 i ME #E Â®EE@2 0 vove 73 81 1/ 2 24= c CD 5 60 ,/ 4 822@230*EN <212222â‚¬Â®0 H.0 0.)0~ 01-- 0 0. r N x o r 3 -22 3 9 2 3 2 2 c,Â·9: 0-Z-1?22 Â· Â· 12. 3 . 1 1 - - 1 1 , '.. ' '~~ ' ~ ~~ ~~ -1~ the Rockies R, 6.i'; 41% umptions r lodge room uest Lo g lodge room isen ( 00092. nferenc oueje 0 â€ž9; -*4 â€ži r 08Â£'On e Sle:01 SU!PI'ng MeN 't'.3 ; 1 . A..I'â€¢;;.-(' 7500(1) master plan 00(1 aAI jeJ JS! U Jo jualussesse X.losino e Suip'!nq ompromises. As t many 6uiuueld se IleAA se suo pesodoJd Melll pue sempei pesodo]d ell-L size of facility needed se/A 96u!Plin elÂ·Ii kiofiejeo esn puel ueld ieise Ul 4014AA v S}Uall,eJ! sents a cursory 6uunp SUO!ssnos!P JO jinseJ e eie e6ejooi eie se liem se 'ueld Jelsew ellj A.leulluns uiplinq Meu pesodoid kleluluns Buipling MeN pesodold ueld uollezÂ®n 6u!Pling 6uilsixEl u are beyon th ir plann d process d specific p jues al# se lleAA se 'sesn J jeell, 1 pepeeu seimioe, 1 2'Ng 4 !/,: gs are not ad ansive remod li _ - - - - - ' 1 1 2 Ar.212.2 ...4 - S lillil lililii ......../ .D~Erk =ccc=c 5 1 i i i i i D,)**D ,/')... S E. rl -1 .F i EmE E EmE ++++++ +++++++ ' 111,11 11 -2 2 46. 8 Â§22 Â§ S:8 illin i,HHI - 6,4 . . 5 1,1 1 1 .2 E LIE .1 S2S ccc .... - .1 . ... . ..E &1/11" 1,/Alig 99= E EEE E 2/i/it--: 26 '39:21.: .At Z Z Z Z Z *!* Â¤35883 *303#53 .. 11. . C.C C /7 2 222 2 222 .-1- C . ccc C ggg ...... .= M.= : j: : i$i$i$ ....... 1 Ng U E â‚¬ 8 22 2222822 '-,4 Â· ccc ./ i C ... C 222 .1 +. 1 .1 2 222 2 i5Si3â€¢ â€¢â€¢â€¢1iÂ·Â· . 1 2 EN= 2 1J1i,1 1111112 iE= I I : al = -T - * : ia 0 0 I . / I > O 0 :p:g 1 1 0 0. Â® E E EEEE .. k WCE <r.2 i 8 1...- --. -. j 9091.- .... D *1**D as r..2. 2 2 05 2 O ccc - #lit 121 2 M f ZEZZ-Z:=:62: ZE= O 0 0 0, O 0 0 0 0 0 0, O 0 0 0 0 /2 2 222,2222,222/222 - * t 2.- a 611@/E*141*116%12 128& 9....8........... m 0 ~ Ir Ir -53. -1 #.9 Â£--:Elt!:t!:2!EE@gi* :: *&@ma,mam'22'ampme= 16 5221919;yESS- -------- S=Int- -; -1- 2_~nul <aHEaaCDHEagfifgia;Â£<HEaa 0 0 co U) U) U) 0 03 U) U) U) u) U) (0 00 U) 0 (/3 U) U) (13 U) U) U) U) Â¥*E Z 31 -,r=~ . 1212 -1 7 A O P . 9 co â‚¬0 00 S? 9 . 2 6Â§ 8 Gi co s! 0 - r Al N N 09 CNI N CNI O - b Zgt= 3 9 p . V . ir- ==44=40=54====114 0 Â°Â°---22.-22*2Â®Â°. - r. r. - co r- r. T- 00 0 E â‚¬2 1=g :2 2 3 2 r N r. - .0<<<< < .01 - - ZzzzZZZz Z 00 0 - 11 ELE" T - i RE- 1- 5 1- 1 - 6/ . Â§:09:20280,8.-co:288 0 18Â§. : ggmgggRagES@82$ 0 : %@ li 111 92*223%Â«Â¤8Â¤â„¢IN;ZKâ„¢ ~ - <0 - CO ..p--â€ž.N--pa,p....2 4 4 . ef 2-&2 k - 1 2 6 O - 8 -m < 3 -2 1 8 E v K 0 -2/ O M 3 2 c N ft&, *fl M= E. INE;â‚¬ 0 g88 . U 'Il 44 1 w j.320 -1//ru- - O . 2&;E 4*U. c dj: 5 - 0 . BAIN . !3,0 r 0 -E 1,2 11 1 2 . Â® Â£00. 35 o ; % firs , a .0 2 SEE < 4 0. IO -- 0 2 â‚¬ A : s .0 2 -Ea *::= 1 -2: i 1 il: 2*2 .*21***,a I,â€¢90224 - --,2-25*2-22 1 -g 0 -u- T g *-, 4 .1, E .. 3 2:.122â‚¬:.:Â®W.gi&336 1 , 188 ~~ 8 65 S --= Iâ‚¬Â®MJ~&2â€¢ ] fi 38>f-6 3 ~* =1 - 2*El,%Â·E~*-%=2*-~35y2333 3 ~g3B ~ EN 3 SES**~E~~0***:0*** N Ni#@:%-2,3E* m m,EN i fs-- 2 1=' 27 +W 7=276= I: I ZCr,, . I- -- -,lk- < -. - 1 Y â€¢ = -426.=: 7 Mt 92 3. ==E -- 2 5,2 -r.. 2 -2 4 5 5 ..f, CECIC'CCCEC ccocceccocgc*Cccc -429 J â€¢. C SS,%%%5%Â§@%&@S@&Â§% :2211211222203333 .3 g .1 + .&&;&&&&&2&&&&&&22 lailijailli ref/Na:/e//fritekk Ir a: Ir r f r 0 Â® Â® Â® -5 : 4- Â· EÂ· tÂ·3:4' j.'.. ._/-1-~ - ESLS~ 9 -71-t: 2 2222 2 22:222 . 5. 65 En 2/. Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§Â§ fiffiffifff 0= m 88 Z AS Â®Â®Â®Â®Â®Â®Â®E22E2EBE2E2 ........... E,ocoE*EEEEEMEMEEIE of<oca:Imac - U , 11 4#4####2**2**2*2** 233 Patilit/i/Pi/P --- - ...4 8888:888:88 EgggEE@EgggE 000000000000000000 222&22 2 2 2222 138 000000000000000000 00 0 0.0 0000 0 1 0 gess.,888888 8 0 -=.sa-=MA=ggia m U' = N - ..... 10 ula) 11 &9 )2 t -Â¥7 %55%15%54Â§54*55Â§1 0 .22.<0.~000..00.. $ 113, 42 5 f 3 ---I Â£CCCCggggÂ£ggggg C . : : 0 0 ...... 0 ... 0 C C E ==*//t===:2@:24:2@ :e::44=:.4 LIX 2&8 11-11-1 ifc 00 ---- -â€žâ€ž-â€ž-â€ž-â€ž-â€žâ€ž.- â€ž-â€ž----â€ž--- r-p-------------- â€ž--â€žâ€ž------- 10 - h - .. zm ir k, 0 - m a 00.(NI %*6Â§Â§88zgzgM:30 ! ~85881'ZZE@ R @282ESfESSERS50*6 8 2%685:BÂ°:0:28 5 . ~ ~Z : E &10 "L- ~r-~-~, ,Â£~ wh Oci 9-: :: ~ 9.. ..r ... 9-1 WagmAS e~,r ~__,ri co ef â€¢ri ei c,i ,Â·> Â·- .i... w cci ..r ~ ,ci *.. 29 ..r * - 1- 2%8 - O 0 - .- P Z c cÂ» ... C I * - 11-fo : -f iii F f -fi- E .2 0 0 A C > - - 33 - 0/ES , O 2 &256 & /2/2424 @2mmy b-- 12 *15 f rg 551 , 2 2, 1 .Â®*ES *f,% Bf# : L , 0 IR E. &111 AW 0 1%1 ----C- - . 3/13Â® 5 Â® LU Â» : f 1/ ir D i i . E le I fo 0 e 21 War : N N. N N. CNN. O 0 01 - . W Al N N F C 0 0 IE- &-fi-8 SE 0 2 ES:0 Eec ... - CO - -Ul- i 10030.-w- 0 .. 1 - 0 0 0 0 2 1- --------- e . 09 : jifililial iliff@91 1 *lifilifilii ! 118-2-tillifti,il-fi i Hilluilli C 1'.Â·-1 4 13/13%65.1/25/8/11/11 3 13-R Â£'tagia,33% 3 /2&88:22'155.3/5282/8 2 a:Â£*,%'majpa AS E . Z E 0 U) . 0 5 . i N - 5 J C I - 1.-- =-le.2.0-2 -f - 1 I 1 - 'El#efilf.WlÂ·!1 k 4:.a\(1,4.1"4Â·, /}~i,?. /' 'ii' "I) ' ' 11Â· â€¢. , Itt . 1 :- linv j 'If 1 ungilt;:4294..,â€ž .~1...,IT{Ki 14 B....1,4-- - Remove Staff Lodges) Remove eAOLUekl eAOW eAOUJIB JeGU I.OUJ Butpling Lnno Remove Replace etain etain etain Historic uieled Buisno Housing Retain ost Roo Housing Retain Retain Ute)ekl BuisnoH Ne)S Ulejekl BuisnoH ge)S Fle H uonee.loahl uo,une 00 Out Housing Retain Housing Retain U!elea Bulsno uieteM fulsno Jels sulgeo uo,uni Awl, 01 Uotpur,J eAOIN @AOW@kl uo,unekl Cabins 91 01. ~~U~Luuno"uns Et 91. SCo'IÂ· NE 491'8LL sBulpling Buns!(3 slelol pue,E) Slijol UO!unIZI Â£ S LEZ ~e~01 HKE ; Â·tri 4 yp,j 1 1 , 7999?1,74.1' JIi... Cabins eunion etain ing Rooms tration Building 1 Two Bedroom Cab Odessa Staff Lodg sao!Ale SeDIA.le uiel.23 uoiurahl u'ele uoiuna (esnoH ouoist uoiunekl Ouols! uo!un@21 u!91821 uolune ls, uo!unekl (SUK*OB Generations Reun i n Cabin Meeting Build ng raska Meeti 17 48 98 iÂ·Uirl'41w.â€¢~Â·'6'-Â· s ~ ~ Trv A fr:~ 'Â· Â· 4,,P ir.:Â·.,<Â·'.Â·. 0 U 11 <a / 0 m / .. 1 # 11 2*/ = C \ / Z E.,0- 115 3 V r 2 â€¢ 1'& / Lu 4 -E 02 JO Tâ‚¬ 5<5419'00% $ W 0-1 lyl. i.& h/ ~\~,/ E X\\\ 51 7 2 j -, m J 1 M ~ 9:=:%4' -- Ill -<4 en =E : 4 0 --' - 11 1 -> t- 10 \\3 2.4.-29 68 7-2-2 . 1.-4-7.-0 - CE q ..1044-6 >4\il i.-41- O c O 73- m 0 Z Â»Â« a r- -- U) E = . Ill/ 1 1. 4 -I \ , i .),..A ' '3 2 X i -* 11 3/ J 0 9 X O g (Â©Lm 0 O1.U Mo - 2 10 C ... 1,0 I e â€¢ 1 Tc= 7 I. 4 1 9 0 1 2.8 m 0 . 4 â‚¬12 E 05= 0 2- " ,\Â©42. $ 418 - , Mt--1 -'â‚¬ 1 .1 0 i r--1 E CU 1 2 2/ \ C h C ~9! .il / /-/51 4Â©ET-*) V A . -1 */P -l tu-/,- b ~ 6 1 1 -- e i .2 i - sE i br, 1 0 , 1.-- 65 8 1 X 1Â£ t 0 . O 1 c me 9- P . Fi \ l . W, 07 82< - * -2.7 --9-- x EQ'-7-X --i 1 M 2 _3 La---~ ... In 2 /- Zzy =27*::1:mt --- i /9 \= 9 8-- . ... .- ZE Â®--6 1% 3 i ' 1" 41 Uj 2>1- /9 3 -- . Â« ill .. +1 ./,j -- , .. m /" w 4, L /~Â· 14 I 1 Â« ifi//, 7 E~~ 1 lei / L 77- fS: '2 ' J ' BE c i ..06 0 Â® C C /1 ' 0 a 1. r E S =-1 2 -lhl g ria . S - 0 0 . 9041. ,~ 0 5 - a 1 \ 11 - / C ,----_tL} i. - - 1270 . r-3. S. E 'Z 10. C I . PE 5 Â£ - CO iii 6 Ii- ID .EÂ® =MÂ« %f / p - -- BALIC 8131!0 -0 7 0 ' -ru# -1 5 EE= 00 -Am.=m W â€¢- 1-0 C 3 1 1 1 ifÂ«j~ < UN...A-IN ,> 2 f' g. C, 2 r... ./\ .0 5 E f 12666*0 -ria si t A , -Al. / -W - I - -8 -I -,244'.Â«J / .Â». 1 ) f. i. A.A ./ 1 , m .1 3 S .14 / lu - 1/-0- li X > 0- -I - h..U, - . CT 5 9 + E2 :, \ IN 2 - O C.0 : 6 1 1 I- 1 -7 \ .- 6 Â·6. h 4-'E \1 f 3 -1 I ,/ . 0 il I - . 1 4, P Â· J i A-7" - 51 f - V- C A P.\ r, 1 ... I. ' I. =1 0 fo 4. M 3- i--- 2 -,1 7 430- f h: ...1.1 1 3 \ : i S.5 f.290- Â¤,JE 1,1 'C el ~ m M A - ..1 bUNA: \ ue6!uueld J~d 08 09t 0*Z 7 1 . Z 'C . 14 Â¢ EL# 4 ./ . 4 ..mip,9.1.. 7% 03. 0 - C- c m ..1 ./- 2 .E' ui- 0 :~ -ir E ~ &i ~ US 2 -2 -== 2 -C, C -26 â‚¬0 k.= -= 22 , .0.- C & E .C , , .5- 1 a. 0- 129 MI 9 E @ m =meo * 1 18 - 0 8. a (D JY 1 ~ 3,0. -*-5 7-.7 .. 2 / .c m N c 2 6- 2 E 1% p. M + <.Â»1 0 - B= 1.5 J= - -01 O co . P.,7 *W,!79" I U) Â£ C 6 -2 0;8 E E #-Â§ .2 @ 2 8- E 2.292 a) U) .6 E . . 6.- - ..em 22 75 3 0 413 3 1 4 & 1 f 2 * @ E Â§ * s r2 * 2 (D .Ri , 973.â€ž.5. - I U A! 8 16 12 @2 - >30 M E 1% ~ (1) ~ 4- PE ...; Â·Â¤ 2, 52 ~ 2& @% 2 & 2.5 i 2 2 ~ 5, 3 0 2 1 .4 1.. 492. - 4- 1,. -21 .r'I 7-MND -92 U 10 -EN SE 51 5 -7Â·...Â· -t . 2% 1 -3 2 1 19 & 5 5 2 2 0 5 s g ft 3' 8 2 @ 2 S 1 m - c g) c E m -0-% 6-Ed)Â®92Â¤,a) 522 11.- 11 2 - O- 1 ie .8 m 2 3 N J ~2 fl C Â»14 1 2 '. 0 0 2% 22-3 03 21% . %%:52-c, 28%-02~~ coÂ® O lu W-,(1)Â·90Â·900 0 15 -lad) EAE.2 82 '85 4- -C '.' Â·'W 02/ 2.5~â‚¬.Sl (1) M co m (D > 0- . , E 8 2 2 6-2 2-92 -Â¤ a = E.8 a.-Â¤ 1 -2 % E & .S .2 2 % E 2 ipt-r' m u m e .18 fo m P @- 31 .2 1 > U) c 2 0 -6 -= 8! a) c -i== 4 % a E g E Â£ 2 -2 -8 15 2 g J ~ N ki ~ E g& 0 0 - m ~ 8 3 ~ 1,1 '. I, - 0 5 8 0 v w '05 N w c b 18 2 -g~ = Â¤. B E = m w nom . Â£ E li -% a @ZE 8 0 56 21 CU)- CC(1) 0- Ceo U) ObÂ·-30 00(1)6..C ? -55 ~ u O 2 I c R (0 - (D ~Di E - (D J 2 I Â¤3 (0 J M -Â¤ 0 2 M > m A b-~a/li~ ' 1 C& *. _ m O (D - 25 . 1. E d =Ea-.2(0<Ect-ma. 0 . CL .a. 0-2.a I -- ~0 0 0 0 0 0 , it + - =1=2 4% E W 2' @ m 2 Eo 1241 I --- 1ZZ-27 CO a) -0 - . 17 C f i _62 + 2 2 - C 2 E 9 E -mc 0 - d .9 - m E - Â·6.m r e -0 0 2 E m - u, a o 0 16 -0 0 :258.E & I 11 -, *- L Â·= -0 * 2 m E ~ CD .E c B y g & R t (0 2 a.% 2 8 2 $. -16 . 9 ...fl. - 0.= 0 0).C E i &2 E E q. 5 5 & N -4 8 0 2 le 2 0 4 % 1 16 Â·62 52 0 -9 2 = 2 0 t; a: .go al . 2 2 -5 ..1 2 1 : CD . 1 8% M.2 3 2.2 3 4 g 22 -C Na:u>[2(00:2(1)=OCDâ€¢ â€¢ â€¢ â€¢ 02 v .- - I , 3 05 0 --- O 0 0 0 31 --- a) 1 0 2@*=5 62 lE B - a) a) 16 2.35 2 * 2 .4 / 2 0 2 m ' n -C k - ro C 2 0 8 . C O - 1-im.Py, 1- r * . . -4 ->F ' - 00 cEE<o= m Sa ' - m E .G O S & 5 @ & c, 25 1 - :1 4 4 , '1 4 % m g -- 0 0 1 m c L O w - 0 0 (0 0 44 C '. m k.2 2 O (0 L (1) 2 'c r - w CO 4~ - " L - ' 0 C L 03= 0 -- - w 2 6- IR- g % 6 -03 1 B -' .).-I E 0 0 0 / - -Â¤ E US O.b c E E .8 8 R 0 2 cD C (D R 1 .g , Kg<Â° -3, %1 .2 18 (0 v 2 342 u u,2 - rhaw n :11 14 .y I m 2 2' .5 2 0 (a & m J = Ec,0,2 P- > 25 % 2 # Z . .8 32 ~co-23* Rui,ad tr @2 C CD ' Â¤) .C 2 -21 # Â¤ ~Tri- v ~ F~ f ./ 10 .m *2 -E@ m N . * C 1 Ji , X C 16 16 {0 m (D * G (0 16 E A. . h 3 0 5 2Â£Â®2.50 4 ./1 < 56 EE % 73 5 1R _E %(1) co . 2.0.= S E = - C Â·r- CL 'C =Em (1)(0~TS g]@ ..Â·Â§2 3 3 2, S 1 k 0 . 1 : 4 0 K 1 4. ,v'.. UJ 0 533 # g -3 8 ~ . L 20 0 00 0 0 o , .JO 2Â· ~ E v 2 Ic * 1 M lai @ E (1) S.0 2 7 9 #4 0 - 2 1 EM 0 - 0 mE im .. 4 .1 31 og 0 J 4. 0 0 0 2 6 - 2 15 9 -/ :- LIJ 01 : 9 CD G A N 0 0 5 -2 2 -2 2 -. 4 v a) (D E - Ul 0 6- 2 -5 x v m .- m . -va,821 L- 3 0 m 16 0 0=2 0 - C 0,/4 7 - = C) Co a) L Â¤' 2 8 E F ... + c a -J 1 02 - *gi#1*80) - d E 6 -= (D Z k iR 95. 81 4-- C C C 0 0 C -3 - O 0 5 g E .@ tj - J U) C O Eu m (D -2 i 1 ii 1 0 3 9 .0 11 - ro (D 4 EO . e 2 4 m 31 C) m E E 9 -0 m 11 73 3 4 m > Ea)x m = ..... Â«3 - 111 N Z .m % 8 4, I: _ i li ~i JO ~ 8- 2 F R~ .2' 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ N #fi * i 2 0 - 6 ---- 2Â£2%=-5-3:625% =323 ..01 0 2 - b :7â‚¬27 -1).~~1 - 1 ts 9 -2 4& 2Â¢ mt * li .5 12 & ST Z B i 2 3/ 0 - E cc J 5 51 m m- tE 9 8% a O (D (D GE E E- O . 0= 50 0 4,0 coo 000000 ; EL m -1 - t.--=.2 - - ..:&12 **c F.... 2:.1.1 - . -, Lk fi,Â£111$4 -Â£,4 ~ -1 -~ Jegnqjoi 5upped Su! e) Jell,le0 eA!;noex3 ueutssellps (elqeuquepi Alisee ue u!ew) ulnuoupnv ledulaH M 'sesnq suoiloeuuoo pedool Je u6!sep 0!jell}see Ull11000e of vehicle-pedestrian conflicts by ispersed tion syst removing AAeu Bun 841 u! LUejSXS peOJ 841 0 J slu of intersections to provide "T" Jo uogejoisei edeospuei pue 6uipei elli:1 strian a n (requires improvements) loop road system, reducing peOJ X.Ilue eaAoidule pue eoiAJes AAeu e luelueAoidull sejinbef) Jopp,00 uep:seped u!eA U!41!AA 0!#e.4 eouues pue isenf} eleiedes Xlejes JOJ SUO! joesieju! XeM Jo uo! s, including: SJUal.Ue/\OJ vements slueq liu pue 1 cessing the main core Â·elis ell; eas sh lebrated with architectural s eie 6u Inq Meu Je4J esodo accomm in pedestri n plaza ated by|~ing~cil~sfw#hin Mety) re efficient circulation and more blic side of the facility) and used as designs. the Rocki e areas. nizational structure f Walnut Room / Pine Room Suipling u 11 Jls!uiwpy o ountainside created U 2 0 J (0 f %.m ,i .3. 8 '. 42 6 2 Â® O _ 0 .2 -um 2 4, .C EN M (6 (D 0 2 53 11:*usE C -O >,m 0 .9 3 (0 0 9 R - C -02" 2 0 U) 2 & (D (0 0 (1) - 0/ =22-vao=E (1) Â·E r N 2 3 -0 2 Â° 2 -C ~ f ~1~ ~ i tz 5 k.> E a) aw U,= R .2 a .0 2 B (0 d . 2 W W 0 Â§*gE C a) EE Â£ g'-'mli@g O 0 -'"-ry - 11 -231% 8 9 8 2261 . .0 -S 5 :Elt: Z " U.1 2 2 c 0 -2 m = :5 0 2 1 0 c= 0 0 Â·g g :2 -~ 3 >:'8 0 0 E @ 2 G .0 N N 9 Z >- -a o > 13 E -C :M g E - * c c Â£ .c - o cp - Â·Â·- co c u .3 % m .9 19 w 9} 2.-- :11-1 W m<ov<Maa><.0>E L w LIL m B TU No O 0000 LA b 4 0 ff % ig : o co M & E 2 -5 c E .16 -~ _ ~ i~ ~D E E - 0- a) 10 :E &* &@ .3 @ i Â·ai g R 0 .: 2 i .E f U) ..2?4 37 2 im 92 44 i â‚¬ 102% A 51Â§21 a. 0 '*00 . 2Â®Ec -= 4-{0 C 60(DZ 9Â£-3 2 v "- f -0 v - -C 3 m .2 -- . 23 1 2 J 0- 0 -- -C .g) U 0 - = U) 2 4, 22 -- 1 82 -0 2 0 5%8-5 9 2ECO U) M O A, 0 C 1 0 7. E = CD -2 2 2 g .= C U) C O -- (0 , 0 E (1) 2 (0 g 0 3 41 - WL r 1.22â‚¬ m Ti NoE 58 C <212 3 3 &%â‚¬*2~ Â·- = -- =Z U -2- --I - * & A iii O 0 0 0 0 I ..- 4 - 1 4 :f L.. 7 .4 -g 8 72. I. 0 2.2 50 allilillillillillilliplimil lit 0 2 52 ro g y @ 4 BLE @ -- 'v. ,r ,% 7.7 .4-k,8 /~ ' - ~ ~~~ ~ ' _ -331 -1 i t. i g .9 2 J - , 4 m "1?-1. 11*".. 2 21= - -C - 22 27 ' '9 't . _ =.... . 2 5 m (1) - ..4 t =-711 > 51 2 0> 5 09 2 *ts , .4 i. 12. 4. Â·Â· 2 1 iii (O 9 5 u-'060 .4% 4 ' -W R .t., - .....'. H * .C O E Â¤) 6- t ~' iE .,.. .7 2- ro , - 2! N. I , 0 0 . 9--h= f &. 1 il ' 2*, 21JI ~:.is, 4 C ...... - .6 2 1 0 2 m .810.liz.- 2 - m./ 04â‚¬ msN f â‚¬ 11 J ' gi MEE aoe 152--Â· , 5 2 (D [I] a Cl U) cm co 5 - 2 4 + Â· E m b : --- ,. - JOâ€¢ â€¢ 2 446. C 0 < E 0 - 6 E JV 2 5 / 2 i-- I. (,08 E 0~@v=GEE-ai Â· 4 49 42 &2: 45 % M m li 9 & 2 fi % E m o cn = 4â€¢ J (1) 23 2 2 & C .s g (0 = 73 -P 2 0 - ti -Â§ 2- C & f Â§ E S I ~ i i 0- 5 i E . w - 1-U) 2 a- 8 2 -(D Liz .* 2 (D 2 i 1 %O g Em Â¢ 2 16 m x _ 0 0 . ~ -0 2>2 -2 16 2 2 7 @ & 4 g /5 - . a 0 (D 022 12*@ 3 1 -1 -2 u RM m= i 5 -g ., g 1 ., CD - O (0 Ov m 2 E 0 & .9 -E 6 {O -~; E D Â·h 1 Z C , 13 2 2 J.>CEW 21 c-> 0 C- 11 . I 1 2 + W -4 .3 4 1. 22.21 - . C (1) c :W o -B -52 -2 CD :m & 1 0 J m , 2 5 O 0 M J = &- 0 '.' â€¢ .. / k Ove 5 12E 0- 0 0 . -Â¤ a. 4- 6 CL 1% EE 41 ~ 8 2 3 it O 0 B U) *- w ... E Â·= 2 0 e ~m . thigir fl I a) a.CLmÂ· 2 ~ E @ 6 2 2 4 .EE %3 .~ *E a 2 m .3 -Di (0 E O (D -- 3 0%& 6 0 -2 g * 2 0 w .52 2 w 50 U, (D ~ 0 32582Â£'E @ 8- h (1):-E , k CD -c ; O - 1- .:5 - 1. I - 2 0 0 s O =b 1- .E 15 2 2 .. 4 JO 0 0 C -C 0 NE 8 2 -.- 0 0 0 B 0 (D - -- c .!2 1- Â» - U) C)-CC 2 -1 -=. r., 0 ,-cr - 0 - b (0 - (0 C (1> 0 0 -O 0 - .. ' ki,O'5(0 6,0 - 4,-~ 1 - 4 14.1 310 1 1444 P p.:''Ii,414:'i' o 412!; i.-48*4-16 0 1 flit U+:. f , .~ 1:1'i.f .".t!2,~rtiI,??ti'.,1 :, i.j>j,7,*.. "4}1.till,r-1,14Â¢25'....,IN b ,- 2 developed for the and ro K lig i s required on estrian routes and parking areas. Willome Conference Center (signage denotes 1 1 be energy efficient. pecies that use a consistent light source concept is L ght stand should be of a themed image ovide safet , reduce color to 1 prove aesthetics. h a consistent style, color and material, based o Willome Conference Cent should meet "Dark coordinating with other site materials. Inoo su61%%'izzz:rj essej5 p onns AlojeinBei alo!4eA -e6eu6!S nq iens!A lel.U eps 38410 41!M 6u!1eu!pJO( 3 6!Sal!s al# 41!AA Pejeu!0000 S! Jel# MeIA 1 -quoo 'seoeds ajeeJO 'poilllOO euiPÂ·'ooo V aSeuf)!S leuonetuiolul b 0!jel.Ilsee seele eioo e41 eAO 46noi4) su6!s leuoileuuoiu! pue su6!s Jo e i 6uplied pedeospuel s pejeulpiooo v -aBeu6!9 eA!1eidlejul o i>ped le#nq 'sjoi Buppe ousiA el# 6uileonpe sieued emleidialu sesn oinosei le]Illeu pue 0!JOjs!4 S,81!s e Slo| 6upped ell l ueei s *Iiens!A .UogeA.leSUOO lejual.UUOJ!/\Ue S luOJJ elqls!A 'sufils 6uipU!#eAA JO[e 841 u! sessei6 eA!1eu peje6!33! pue esn 145!U Joi pewuil.Unll! eq pin04S v 66eu6!S 6ulpuliXeAA pue apis peo] leuoip sees e6eu6is new tree and sh t (ismejul lensM sep!.ADJd eje edeospuel) 00 'Buipnpu! 'UAAolls eie see *43Jeje!4 V 0 le sessei6 pe Ileuosees pue peje6!Jil ette should incl and/or s )"t-;.. "UT T.9â€žtpuâ€¢41 .4 "Ittic *VA--I.,.1.'.,fy,r'.,1 "#; added th te's core 46!4 u! sesse]6 eA,leu peje6uJ! pue peAAOIN u!>ped pesodold seeie uoileJolsal U! sesseJB eA!;eN trees 6 pue seaJe ueeif esn 00 341 Jo Jejell,ped el# that fit well 1-b.11 141.8Â§: --A .-6.-:â€ž 1, E MASTER PL 43Â· 1--. A- It Â· -- : 2 - ..5 - It .-I 1 0- 1.- 1: , : i.' E B V., M . I W .~ 8 2. .E ..4- - O - f ?1 *# 111. ..4.77.-Â»-- 47 -' E 422 C 1 i.:- r e l: 995 I **/401 ./ fr. ' I. 1-1 1.=. - ..1 4 :p -7 0-2> $ ' 6 214 = ~C- ---*56.,~ 2 I m m =Â¤) 2 aaev 1...E :-2' .- ) *& ~2 ~ ~ ~ Â·* 5- ~ m S â‚¬ 2 -E- -E --9 E .. ..f j C 1 ..7: 1-2 2 B v 2 0 I 2 aÂ® '%3 8, moDE&801<mÂ® 2 K N I % 0.<a, .-/ U 0 . I 2 = 2 0 3.. 04*22*' L - 44 ~. 1 Â¥2 - I 4 0 0- i C (D 4,1/=- .2 0 ro O U. C X W 0 p. 1â€¢ i + I. 0 . .. 0 9 0 . 4 Â®ZE * '. 2 b 22 7 4. -, f *i tA SE 8 :L2= â‚¬21 , 0 16 5 m 1 ,1 1 0) .2 1 4 43- (0 - m 23 5.11 - 4 4 1 -44/ 4 g C' g To 1 0 0 ..'- I m E C.c -- 1 3# . 3 m m C C 2 - 3 Cl a. E 13 - O 2 m P. 4 0 - C O ...2 > f R & -D; 4. .. . ' I 3 02 c c 26 2 \ . Â· 0 0.20 maa).Em r 4, .4 â€¢ J â€¢ . .I, D. -. 4?3*Ph 0. r 9 W. I. 4 -CS - f O 4- 0 . 4. 1 4. Q 1 /,- Â· - r 3 - r==21 ' 2 7- 4 232 - # Ik: - -0 0 _ O -u J CE m o -- 3 ZE- 7 0 c 00 0 Er - & 52 0 2 *8 28 -8 - 22 % 2 73 * C ) --1 -2 r.- . al . 1 0 0 c >aD D .2 . , h-Â·c. - C (D 125 * i amE Z ~,f . E -84 8 2 1 9 28 2 g - W C * 0 (0 C e P.'. 2 Â§. CD 'b E C 2 (1) 3 E 0 0 CÂ».92 - E U) a) +L / a 'I .9 2 0 0 (1)90Eam 02 c c H g EN % Â£ 2 5 b- w ~ (1) 3 ~ 9 0 - E a~ ~ 2 m if 22 -5 -g -2 -2 -= 2 18 0, m =8 m E -B- a as 0 92 8 lf,2~ 4 -6 2 0-1 5 2 0 In 5 -2 11-@) 2 5 -Di & 2 2 n = S.Z p M (0 3 0 â€ž -X -- m (D 1 1 >a> 0 E 9 0 0 0.9 a (D W >â€¢ c 82 m 'CEGA a,0 C U b Â£ Nt<JO 0 1.Ll o a Of O-0 Ota- 1. = ro 2 5>t - 1.-124 -V' . e '56%25& . ..... = U.1 0 0 g f U m 7 Cd (O -g i :2'61 LIJ (D. - FE m './.-1 1.-- hi 14 4) m ===*~)~---Il ,/i k I - f -12.-2 2 8,~ -I--&- - - = W U) ru 4 2 m .,7 L k f, Im a)= EU a) m a) g.z Â£ .8 0 . CD O 9 .~-=-r- - -C 1- 4- (D 6 0-El ~ E 2 U .- C .0 0 -G 2 'lim:/t/-7 4 â€¢ I- k. rl b f E - i ../1 3 0 -i-*49 "4, 0-0 1 2 E 0 .g, 5 r. 4 IÂ¤A o Â§% - E Â£ 0 0 -m M #; M i .c _ w U) 0 - R 0) C k W W W . I. 1-Â· ~ 2 2 2 g ~ 0 1 Â·~ s i 1 i N :i 3 * i g t Â·. 0 .9 . o O 0 ~~. â€¢ . I. U) * 4 ro U) CO c (1) ro E o , 0 0 Qu C 3 LU 0Ewg v,Â¤, (D - 0 - rou)- 0 0 J (D C -2 . -1 1% _ 16 73 . C 6- (D 0 C 0 E <C 1#- -2- -r 4-*a.-- * 443&...4 ..:{....+HES: ' roposed nature cente~ iang or~~t~r~1~1~gement plan for the 'sesseooid 'se!6oloul.Pel 'Slue.I e41 pue puel Jo esn jue!0 'spolljew 6u!}eiedo 'epel!Jo 6u!1!s seoinosei leinjeu Jo uoilnliod eonpe] Jo 'eAoluei 'jue lens!A 'Slue!31'lu '4Se4 'Sluelll pue jueweBeuew site maintenance projects senss! uo!soie pue e6eu!eJ can encompass a wide range pesodoid ue uo s 'sheAAe6euleip lein eu ie !s e j uoilejeidiejui pue uo!jeonp se~IZE:~(%11=11:2 ~~d~ ~o!~n~ :Uels lie Joi lueJ60J 110.nuoO 40!4AA 'Saol/\el) JO 'Se] oue sauoz e5JelloeJ Jelinbe uiejuievy s.j~~22 46!4 'Smen6 Joi seede as041 01 Slauue40 leinleu eA.leseid Storm Water Management uums 0!jel.#See Joi seu!1ep!n6 doleAea o ; pue 'sseooid 'Sl.Ue.I60.Id lejualuuo.Im (sduls Jell!:1 pelejeBeA) 41!qeuie *seinjee, lonuoo '4!I!qeu!e}sns leJUelllUOJ!Al.le Jo eou 4.}IHH 24:. . ' 'Â·-.Ii}iÂ· f i j.1'.0 i < {1. .:'illj,4...Li...1.,;jil.1. buildings to the greatest 0 ~ eAOid ; SUIeJ60.Id jueule e6pol ep!suielunoIN lejuell]UO]!AU AS e eleaJO UOIWA.laSUOO p les, chairs, trash re nmental sustai bili y and green program conserving ironmental Placed in a screened dump thods and maintenance Mell ejoldxe 01 uoileAOUU! e of sustainable bu le/uesuoo mpsters located in "back envir with a YMCA of the Rocki be planned as future p styllizÂ°lt'~d materia vel ped, keeping in mind th site Site Furnishings Dumpster Enclosure ESTES PARK CED[ -1 -4 1 ..... 0 e a, v.i 2 % .0 - E m g E v â‚¬) k (1) 2. 2 1. 69 0 3 R E :Â®(06) 4, -S=-= 19 -m Â§ 5 E O C C - 2.2 33 ~ (1) (D â‚¬ I -V- 0 CD m b v 3 2 ( Â·5 82 .-> Â£ w 0 0 Â® c * E W 0 2 #E i e 0 >lo (D -Â¤ a) ': 31 2 t .0 a) 2 Â·8 i 9-,- M 0 00).5 1 M 7 8,00 M; 5% 2% 5 6g % m â‚¬EQEEE& (1) *--a 1.5 15 (i) f :6 a.) F e @ 29 Â£ E ~ 8 -9 g E E , 2 2 1 E O (D 0, Â¢6 2% ~ (0 20,= = E -2 2 2 -* 2 = =* * 0 UJ Z co,2 %0-2 2 E E .* RE C co Â¤) 0) (0 M E c 0 8 4 Â£ 2 1- 2 Â®=to,-RES E J =U) .E di- - 3 2 C" c 5 4 GiL .4 4- ... ~200 2 Z 22 L CO M .2 .6 0 2, 2 p{ e .8 Â§ 94 8 2 % 8 ft 3 5 C - J > 0 0 m 0.2 > 16 N 2 -2 â‚¬ PE YE %Â· 2 8 @ @1 2 0 41 0 0 g 8 1 " 8 16 :8 Â£ 2 N Z 2 -2 -Â¤ â‚¬ RE:# E I & c' f Â·E Z~ .6 Â§ f % -B 25 02 58 E-Ma EAS#Rk m .6 71 -% CE LLI LU 73 CE &; i . -G %2 - 2*. 22 ME ZÂ» Cck U' =kc a) -0 -C L 60 8 -2 CI LLI .E ..Ze. e . Co< no. Â» 7 3% In 4 650 0 0 0 . Z %-5 v / m I =11/ AL i ~E~2 2(1) a v * E MA . C 0 2 2 18 1/ 92 2 175 (0 0 0 0 - 0 8 2 8.Â§ -* 7 - 74 O (1) / U,0 0 0 -0 3 (DEC J 0 g U) O C (D .C - OU,Qfc lId 8 5 % p - . 0 4 2 J r. 2 0 + 0 .5 28 22 -- co E- E.~~-~-5-c O z c (D - 02 6- 6. '9 r 35 -0-*A -Â· c -2 6- ~ P * 2 ig gE tdq u, .E 8 .E o v : 5;9"-0 ry -11*' 4/ R E r 1 C O E m & & O 0 0 t-+-â‚¬:ti- Al .. 5 55 (D J (0 - CO E E - . o EÂ£ go 3 - 1,,1, E 0, > -m v M 2 i â‚¬ ~2 0- =E . a J O 32 -Â£'1%1 2/L,Ill'SLI.<. .2 J A ... m 0 0 M O (0 - C --- I .- L -1 6 6 4- C (1) R m u) â‚¬ 0 7 Â£ g 0 ~ ~ 0. 56 -B~ Ui --J - c * c.9 2 C C- ; m EB c I - 7% 6/ 2: 1% 2 , C i m .1= cd)-g C Tl , 3-= 1....a.mi m . 4~4 8 E 8 /01 2 -6 + a 9 - : d 0 CL .a' 2 m a. 9 .--2. . - J.k44.. e - 6. 1 2 0 !2 0- m 9 - a). m 1 i P & a -3- 5 ,a E :t Â·@ 5 f :1--1~ 3 1 3 i 1% 1 1 -% 22 fi 2 EE 4.ZED-howEE.E@:%9)>1 6- %'. 4. Hwi-0 co (1) N. 12 u) 1% geÂ· 2 . 87#ig:322*5&28~Â§8%822on-~do~ ~ . 1. J.4 . .A.- 4- t O 0 00000 . A 7 -3/Â· n= t.'. O -11 a 1 96 - . r - .4 . 2 0 (O -a 5 2Â® c Â® E â€ž. - 0 a) A -2 2 CLb (1) 00 22 0Â£ m .- ,- O 0 0 . W 0 Â£ 5 (1) 2 76 -Â¤ c b B. 9 - 2 U) 4 1 El'l cc. - 5 2 2 05 2 Z - - 6 -1 2-2 c .aE 2 (O 0 a. .33 2 31) 0 0 a - Z ~ X .c (11 â‚¬ t - a (0 2 22 (D - - - :a>.,f 80= =31 .5 @ C .6 a) (0 .- - Â£431/'ll.- - m . - I ..... 7.- ~ 6, c c (n E 222 8 g O 1886Â° 1 E v w 29 Z EMâ‚¬ E (D IE -1.- Â¢ %3 R 3 5 3 & - (D 10 (0 U) Â·- M .C ~ U) ccE 9.0 ro a, a) a) Â£ .- * r 2 0-- co 0 2 -a . 1 S=a s@B â‚¬ -a 212 15. 13 - . 0- a o v m .E .... 2-192 6 E 1- O 0 . 2 421 : 3- Â¢ 9 1/ I .,Ul , Ul > . L I Â® 2 3 A. m o m u, .,h - , 1 - --- x m Z 9 1 0 8 -% - (D (0 - 9 E 0 .C 0 0 A t 9 0 m m C E 4, 1 a a 6 0 = 0 ~* 0 - 42 -92 - 0 m CO t: C o m qi c - E 0 9?M - 16 La i ; 84 2 @ 2 R Z i M i 13 -i -% 1 -2 3 i i I .*13 OV- C 3 m v m * -1 0 b oc - v=2 01. 4- 1 - - C (1) 9 @ 2 (, *w 0 ~ a EQ-*MO--00-%5Cm-Â¤00.LLOO-Â·000 ic i (1) w L (1) 6- a N ~a J (D (D . :2 0 . CD O J 0 92 -c, M * 9) U) 4-5 9 2 $ 1-Ca) r.0 0 4 c- Er o m (D .- C 1,1 m - 0 (D C (D O N E 0 75 11 0 75 12 0 9 Cd 4 - 1 --W - (D 1& .C (0 0 - - .2 Â· 3 1 0 -2 C .- - m a. O â‚¬ (1) L ..9 .~- .5 E &.Â§-E~- . - F -0 0 C a. 46) p A & 0 - ' 1*94- *g C m (0 -~ 0- O - U) a) E o ' it .. 0 E B 0 . (DJ O C 00 ,-C CL C C L- C v - 0 5 0 a -0 a. I :1 Z==18 --1 5 820 Emo i Om. .. ... ..... a. 0 40 0 0 Â« . 0 0 - 242 9 - -72 Â» A DIHIL 247' -:. :i ... 4,4Â·Â· j.1,>18'63)14+1 , '11 , , '+44;Foo,Â·,Â· - -I , -Â·,Â·:, w.liU'.2.1.;ilitÂ·, ) traffic is separated at the site 1-designed trails provid amounts of trail use. ovements to the existin uuoo peoi /ll}ue eol/ues no41 'ejeo!Idnp e doleAea - AJ}u3 1!ullins O ue Jejuao VOIAIA uieul el.11 Jo eieos Jallews Jewelello u! leinjeu eloul Xpedold pue eue-1 dillspue!33 6uils!xe el# 6u!u6!lE aus uee oueieq peo] dool eeje ejoo pesodo Jo junolu e j ol enp s'!eil senD JoJ~~Â»J:lk#~lle :22C . pou uo! joesial ation west instead of so uo'pesieju! eA!la ep!suiejunovy uo!le,uesuoo pue jueludopA 041 01 U0!loauuo 1 41 deul *1!lenb U,04 sen.ledoid Buuoqllfieu cons MASTER PL landscape for guests of all to accommod te a le eA!]a Je uelle>l Je#nq 01 sie#nq leinjeu ui environm c ea Ing include: Roads single track backcount 4 uep}senbe jof slie]1 jueoerpe pue wed leuoileu J pue JU LUSSeSSe oeuu 0 luelds lieR 001/Ues leuoueN suoddns seele ieinjeu,o uo! suoiloeuuoo lieR aP!Aold o e Xi!0 841 41!AA uo!1eu 'spiepuels 1!ell eullu.le einjeU JOJ Sluell]UO]!Alle Ironment. icle, and thus need to walk or eq suogoeuuoo uepiseped ap!/\OJd â€¢ 01 *pedo.Id uo suoneunsep juepodul! 41!qeulejsns poddns sdiell slie]J Jo esn elli o Coordinate with Rocky ny guests do ts interested in trail acti iti ~~ o Benefits of Trails esn epilleA Buionpal Aq seldiouud A better trail network c uld ine pri al new dev~~sambent A accessible trail system. se 40ns swelllUOJ!Alle eA j pue Xpedoid elll u'41!AA Spe4SAAa! M.led seis3 uo slue.IBoid pue Juelud eJ!IPI!AA pue sjueld Joilel! uognood ]!e pue Jeje/,A 7.f -1# ~~~~l :. ~ r rn t 1- 1.-2 -W I ..- I b .8 a) 2 2 5 c a g 41 #: .5 ja Â®* 8 31 2 : 5*2 0 a vE -2 8 * â‚¬ M (D 7 O.6 0 i . - 1 -2 2 92 E-Â¤J 209 Â£ -03= m m a. = (DEE T Â®ma) 12 4 - .- N - m (0 m O m -FECO#0 mc& C:Â£.2 CD E+ s 2 ZES E 'r 0 0 - (D E .0 2 -EEC 202 - 71 g .- L Cl ; ;~3 r'Â·r Â· - O- o W ,02 â‚¬ Cl E D .5, - w a 5 2 a .3 f. p. ro Â«11 =L L E%gF U b - 2 2 : 2 0 fiEE w 8 0 -35 -2 w ui i r I 216 9 2 2 m o 'E F- .. v 2 (1) c ~ .* 2 E ~ (D Â¤, o 2/.m (D & 9 12 9 E 2 0 2 -E -0 -a (1) - c m Z @ 2 % LL 9 m .1 Er M .~ Fn - -- 0 18 -Â¤ f Lvc -- L , â€¢- 7% 0 A t: b (0 0 C J W 859.c p~Em E â‚¬ Â·8- f 6 8 41 Â£ * .g co â‚¬ g J al(0 hOJOJ lec R Â£ M a)(DOCO-m O Â£ S.2 0 '5 0 0 0 # 0 9 c :0 L Â¤) CÂ» C = .E *BEN 92 El:%(11 12 22 Â£2 73 P. r-v 0 (1) 0 -~ COE ME =S S ~-8 18 M 18 -E .. .E .8 0 2 2 m (0 C am-O 0 C== -O 0) 0) 4 4.- a C:D C -Di 3 c ..22 2 - c QI .- n - 2 2 L- S 15 2 * m a. 00(60225(DEd < CE E E Sm O . . . <.6 . I O 0 (D 5. 2. 4-:A C g. 2 05 L Â· i & i 3 4 =2 : T O 0 2 ' - -- m 2 85 .2.5 I 1% g * 4 1 5 -4 , . S = o a.2 44 h 22 3% 0 i . 2 .X '4 4 i 2 1% am 32 iii 2 - . - O I .-- - -' ' -5/ 3 1 E-& M 28 â€¢ I d =EÂ· . 3 9 2 2 ho.5 -- P .w :I- 0.2 0 *t tâ‚¬20 *=N 4 . 2 2 2 Â¤'2 E < ~ .2 X - o ui U) ..Al, 2 - r .2 * 2 W .. 3 & * E- * 3 1 E ~ ~ & :3- h 4 a~-9 f 41. . 3 J.22 ,- E (0-0 0 8 2 5 0 a * 0 0 0 Â£ a O a. 0 0 m 4 1-7 -&. t.1.2.-980--dor'*4 1 002 E LL< 12 Cl Â· -7 . . . - 8 1- Z= => - .Wa=WN.1 000 r k.~EZZ. iE*FFEE E *ELE . :' 72: .6- E* *g f 0-Ed w~ ~ i ms:.2 . m â‚¬ 1 vE &2 - 1 0 0 - 16 4= 0 0 c 0 M 21 9 - .* '.7.=-37.3 9 -0 g -0 -IERa) 2 e a) 3**RE- 3926 -377 2 0 . M Z 8.5 02 -C - 221:= 1 . (0 = C U 129-2 - - = u .u C R h -92 bc .c romo (D > -M a =113 1.- tv 71 0.2 Â£ 482 1- - c.60 E Â£ 2 of f r:. f-t: u 14-9 4,tie' L. m E o o vt c O 3--2 * '3 -1 E o 'c E 90% v L 2 0,2 (D g J ,0 9 U ..9 2 2ENT M -Z = r g * Â£Â£ & ~ 3 i-1 ~ Â£ _ ~ ~ < -t J - C â‚¬ v 16 2 -u 92 .E82.g .4. : tfi = 1 2 Z Z EN * 3-0 -* 50 2 2 3,2,23 2- a. N .2 0 iii 0 -2 8 .4 rl 0 = E (1) O -LL ,- 6 n. 0 - .6 /- .6 a) 0 15 3' % 4 3 EL 3 k O g & 2 45 & 2 2 3 1 45 2 & - 00 0 0 0 0 0 - L - - C --- a) 1;; 1 & 9 3 .C W 00 6 242 9 W U) cEm .4-(0 en = 4 191 cia a> E m =-2 00 .C E 6 -Â¤ E , I , m 4' CO . r'P 2 0-E as8 2 Fcoit E- JL .Â¤ 4 1.7 '11 E F.- - - 0 12 -2 R " -- IiaS -6 -2 K % 0 13 (1) 1/ 2 73 -0 >- 322-*M n 2~22 2 v Â£ C('0 *2 a. U) w w E -5 E ' -- 0 a O.- 2-4. (10 0 1 Tt t. 0 3 0 2 0 = a> E a. S o CD (J J2 E 2â€žU - 733 A O :12 0- 2 -J (0 8 IJ 45 .73 'CM Â® % 0 5 32 S -2 0 -Ccla) - O 2 COO-00 . o C CO E 3 15 01 li Or (D C E a -9- d o 02 5 - E =2 00 . B> O'- CO J- C - ... V - 0 CD cÂ» Li iII . <C CO to Z$ 6. .EX C N k i su . - - .1 a. C f /9 Wt<6 E & 2 k .6 r. 1-E ~6 , I. O 0 0 -* <WO It-- - 0 0 00 ~ (D r. . - Em m O (D e m g~~ E Â· '1 C (D 11 a. Â·- L l. Â¢,0 m . f O 3 9 ~~ .C ro (D 0 C E O U 1 2 CE 2 & CE & I . 0 1? M ~ â€¢Ar , 111'r, .1,5, 1/,} Vew"**74 D.46,0,41).3 %,60 fiI')) j)a'.i .' i~ Di 'l U i ; i ~i kÂ· -AN ; ,Â£8{kt.rud,"140 1%(111 euueld end of th P!Aojd 01 uueld eele~~e~ls pedeg Aipue!4-ueulseped e pue sjueAe space and pedestrian area. Utilizing the natural topog phy, ! epeueluoid ueplseped v . elljol pe03 Mell e Bulpuejxe p ue lueuJU 041 ueemjeq eeie e inOM0O0 dn Additional sports c C eates an u uee oviding a continuation of the interior open and sport ils! ei Jseng speok, ealÂ¥ 31!S Dze 041 pue rph,&'4Â·111;., /, '*4<f;#W+6 + 4" i if i euids ueu central ge for most of the s are removed from the i plaza spaces sited e green 'F* Â·gl'i~61#44186'Â·"1111,'*'(iii,i...1>1~1 k..1 - c ..1 Lm'Â® 74 ,- Ali~ 14 Alt . ,:, i <â€ž1 , 2, dated green open space for large planned ore Area Loop Ro gathering areas and special events nment of the gu , rerouted thro ortunities to develop an outdoor tersections to impro heater south of Ruesch Auditorium pus Core Area, Specific Site Areas a uesch/Adminis ore Area. Parking f nan c ore space /1 esn-mnIN pejeiedes pue 1!BAL ep!su!ejunoV\' interior of State Rooms, access to the Din center o eeiv ueuiseped pue Supped Suloobl ejels OURS!xEl 04} punoie peilloJ sl eele ep!suiejunOUI mprovements for Mesa Drive ac dn 6uipeel eAucl ap!su!ejunoW Jo juelul.16 D ive and Mountainside Drive on of Mountainside Drive from o Elimination of various existing, unnamed and parking lot connections inside the m between Mountainside Drive and conne =t ~.1 . 7 . 43--3 0 8 .. -i 5, IT 0.2 16 th . , 21 1 J Ui E 2 â‚¬ .4 18 i Â· it ' ill.*..... 4 v.(13 9 C * O 4 6 1.-5 -P ...... C>@ 2 v O 2 - 73 N -9 E ,.. ~14 m u,3@< Z E 511' .1 m , E a) (D-Â¤ a) (1) -0 g J > - 0 00 â€¢- c ro m o O 2 a E 2 4% . 164'i.. 1-4 4 1 , .. 3~WieSE -U,Dec . ' 1 l-ua 1, fc . I ... U Z E E CDO p'-r'p:4.n. -9 0 > 10 5 2- g ./ g Jil tl E Z, . Â· 11/Vatj.ygifill - 0 - 1/ 41 1a- .Z (1) 3- ~E 2 -93 M . I ......,-. -, , ,- - â‚¬ 5 04 of Â¥ E D (1)*<32 0 01.COO Si 1&,41/17 COC @IMOD~~ E -5 R E _,0 uf u, ch :% E ~ - p 4 LE 2 - 2 8 x (D u) m - 0 6- .1, . . 17' 'f * (D g c ,Z g O -C- m C ,* 1 0 , 02EM 2 2 1* , % 52 NE 03 ..34 Kâ€¢,/, * L ./* 2 m (1) 2.23 1172 < e r 0 0 9- 0- = 0 - ta) .0 2 a Z .- P (D E r 2 . :111 JI Â¥ 1 A (0 m @ 1~ b .- 55 ZÂ» â‚¬ 0 0 3 25 0 9 . -DOZOW m Â£ *~,1 b. o o o o E ' ~39:=34, 132 Â£ ~t 2 C C (D --I.). I. 11 *0 2.44 B Ng m = m â‚¬ I 7 -2.- 1.- , c 6 0 2 0 05 2 6(1) 0 33 Â£ 80 O .A = m 1 0 0 EO :9 >Et: rTl & 2 O -O 6 2 2 c 3 (0 0 E c a> 9 o Cl - (D rt.:m Â· i- . 2% - 0 0 2 0 3 .9 (D O C N 7.4 , 59 h a O 0 2=3 E - O - - 322~ roe ro 010* -3.11 - d.LA g di to- CÂ» C .1, S [0 0 . U, 8 0 0, 5 -0 -5 EO m I..=Â·kz- 2 83 = Â£ 6 6 4Â·& 8 3 5 -m (0 (D -2 < .2 C 2Â§. 9 a).== r 2 ai (1) ME 0 0 0 > m- SELZE-* 28 ~ ED J M O .9' O m o .C a) .9 5 5 b Z (1) m 0 02- 22= u, 22Â® c.c 2, ~. :8 2~ i. 0.9 .% :6 (0 a 1 0 (D =.8 2 6- :*.7-: 9. 2 2 co % E < -3 > 09 =C 1 8= -= %2 0 v oc,2 3 7* O 923 55 e Â§ *89 , B .va) ceo m 2 D.J - -- 162 5il E 0 -9 2 5 0 2, c 44 C *E 55 5.1/, 13 (, - (1) 2 0 2 -O (0 .1 m 0 z = li. 1-L ~ (0 U)09CCCU) mgâ‚¬m.Â§ 2-0 1 -0~ch -~~ ~~ 3 'Â¤- 0 Â¤) 1-: 2 vEE - 1- m J (1) C - g ~ cE g c - 0 9 -2 3 ~ 5% 2 i -2 -1 2 0 .. 2 (1) -6 (D - 22 - Le# o I N- M o en Â·- %. v % S ~ E E i 2 j w E.~ % * # %Â£ 2 2 -M Z (1) CE _ 2 au) ~~ 2 ; 0 - C 11 21 -L-1 a) m (0 0 - 2 @Eakedz.65 .5 mozo w z 9 20-%2 . . 6-0 0-0 9 m O 0 0 500 O 0 Zo - 2- 2 92 L (10 = 0# 8 (D > giaÂ·:Lit a. 4- .6 3 e (0 .*2267 0 EO J tr. 00 Â¤- M - /9 13 c 25 73 0 0 - 4- 21 ./ 1. Da) LEd.6 0 Â·-O 2 g.Noida~ .2 :E .% < (1) ., EL W (0 -.-- - 0Â§2~-Ed@g 73 0-0 , 3 -it. .E < 2 2 (D '-' 0, < 9-'0 u' 0 -b -- ~2 -lt< m â‚¬ O 0 -M 0 0 2 2% 49 (6 0) - m DE- i c 2% E &- 0 - 00 1 0 0 , M_ CO 30 9 4 1 C _- .z . I APâ‚¬ -#~ 8 <& <' M j -" it|~ I co 92=L m 2- m =0- C C 0 0 * 0 E 6% 228 225Â·89 1 '* 3~ F' 4 - Â£ $ 0 m (D - C (0 -1 . a - p CÂ» c -C, g).05 - # 1 -m J 1,9 21 1-1 2 1-13-9 & CÂ» -- co - 05 g; ~ a. E a E E 16 2 * 2 5 2 8 â‚¬ Egg~ mi 8, 2 (0 0 b= 7 1 2 3 1 8 3 B J- CD .9 . 0 2 8 0 , , I -1 U L 1-1- 1 0 0 0 0 2 31.9 - ., m I-%/-.1 9 LiE -- O 21 4 0 L 19 (D m CD O C 0% 0 . 2.1 :- ) %2 2~ U C g D L 2 32 V- /4/ = 0 2 00 L (1) CD Â£ c ~ 3 m - v 2 -Â§ ;Â§ 2 f.i i O 6 (0 u, 0 -E 8 g Â·u c L â€¢2 ch a, Â·1Â© 9 {8 2 .x (0 C + C m f~f# 82 95 5 5& #S 2 9 9. 4 22 0 17 3 2@E 22 . Ea@.62@E@Â£ a m P colE 1, 9 : U = ai .9 -a -c I4 6- 10 $,3 -1 4 u (0 4.1 - - E a. .C < (D U) (0 f R w o .2 8. 3 *Â§ EE.8 0 - Z -5 Â£ 5 (D ; Se : c i & : i w JF o 1 6-Â£22.2.:pi i M .MY JM J b .71:, 2 8 41 w 41 0 3' :E Â£ 2= -Â¤ E -23 -0 c 16 a -0 ./r 2+46 -0 -- -~ 5 ~:3 2 -b C.% 3 @) 5 ~ ~11.Â§.f.E 2329:.2 1~- a.7 0 Â· ..f 4 (0 92 8 -B -5 M.* $942 E - 11 I m a) {3 (D :8 E' 05 -2 e 8 M c *- .6 - .... -' 2, - L =- 4. â‚¬ -EQUEgui {30 0-82%2Â£.g~g:~:6 92 ~Â¤-~E~ .9Â£2 g e 8 2 3 16 -0 2 53!E 22 -8 1 g (1) c 0 .X 2 -'Â·- 6- (0 0 2 1 6- .r . â€¢i < B '= 2 2 g 0 4- E v c 0 (D ' * CE (0 0 (1) 0 Of a J u) 2 0 I -- : 8 1 1 i' 0 1- 0 0 a%b 11 % 2 * 8 a 2 a a . 6 0 0 li Â¥9. 4 r i ro U) 22 m N I u 4 - -' J m - CO 0 C 6- (D f 0, (D u 34 73 - NJ E E a C O - } m E .4- E o (1) 2 0- w Ji m (D U) E: 252 r Â·-,A WM c . C O 8~ 1 - %3@22* 2 0 - I 0) [6 (D 0) / A 0 0 L m ac (D - W (0 E E 31 J * 4 -F - I . . . . E Â» 16 44 .Â¢0 0 0 0 0 - ..:1 5 1. -,=. - -23 - 02- i..~~ .0-:-9- __ ~~ ' 11 *tiA!;;li,- ..:, 1, bUW#b)v %14@11, i f f, j .'0 6 '1,26Â· ,:. 4 servic ors rega paved site J J eie Buplie 93mtÂ¢t location; renovati pl!nq woonseJ d inoyooo Jaddn 841 area south of the Upper Cookout Jelee~'|Aqdulv inoyooo Jeddn renee Expansion Upper Cookout all. seating capacity o Rebuild the Amphil eaie s!41 ee]Â¥ 6u!deospue 'eoeds 'iejueo e] atural drainage corrido s e Cliff, Deer seoeds ezeid Sll!OO4Sai uoisieAU00 eaje SU!qeo ;sang Suipniou! 4 el! eq eps e41 aAOJ einleN pesodoid ell 1 41!AA pelells s! 6u!snO4 #els ell'!Mini 01 suiqeo isa pesseooe Buiwed MeN 'eo s Xlelle 'seeie e683 o Propos Fine Arts Center, sodoJ enhanced wetlands area olidated uedo ieJlue ezeld Jo 4uou s6u!PI!nq ulleelli MeU Jo uol ejeis 6u!ls!xe ums Aliluel-eiBuis Buns!xe eleo :apr'tiou! suoileool pesodoid :fu leuunj uo peleool eus 6u!sn04 #elS AA eoue.litle liluluns 841 U]04 SSOJOe peOJ areas, agpoles, large -like open space vert the existing eo!#o eoueuelulew oj Ile elop to meet the future sting museum ility. Develop a new peuueld oj eoueue; Jeje~rz:zgg~::0 sepeoel I inpe 140 e Activities Center rooms -- . E-15 f i ' -â€ž .. Ut < ile . ..2 ,â€¢1//4 2 L, 1 -:35.; 1.5 t. , k , ' -31 ~ 61 I '4 :>2 %. r . Â·- . . 64 4 â€¢ ..9 0 ' 4 1 J .. .4 f NT 7/ , A Â· A IC' I. :* 1 2/M . 4% 4 (D 7 1 ,-3- 32.9 0 -O 0 m.9 Â£ E 0 - - - U) X .C J -C C (D * 0 0 1 2 -2 0 C C (0 4- (0 0 125 -ui ~ >C (DE 88EE RE 28 E â‚¬ u) c LE us Â¤-O E. 1" I.- U . co N .92 52 (D (1) m. 2 S * 3 3 m ==10=13:Ly.1 0.= -2 3 0 4 g . 49 /0 1 :r E - - m 2 1 M 3 -2 2.2 2 : 43 3 < .0 c .~ .Di 0 3 em.9 5 9 6 % 3 5 (Ca) & 9 2 15 - - =C 0 C 2 2 1 i.4 . 92 0 0 9 2 ~ I v .a 2 - 6 (D â‚¬ 2 il E -3 0 -* i i /Â·il i 11 .Mi il .. .tur a) 2 â‚¬ E E (Dwor t, .2 % 2 % 2 -~ 5 M 1 2. 2 's is B W 3 -0 Â·s 92 2 E 2- 2 &-690- 9 0 2'mcg g a g A .2 5 502 at-2 E U 2 F ~g * @ 8- 2 -6 -m ._ *- * iM * .M~ -0 =E' E 1 -gi C iÂ· Y g c Z a) m 2 a) b 16 00- Ec (D~(1),- O C .2 E X -L E (0.c f CJ w.0 (1) CO.C r 0-Â¤ a) Cwro. U, -Â¤ .2 (D E U) c Â® Ui 2 3 O c (1) 9) 0.h J {n 'u) a; a O i .Â¤ a w Â·2 10 05 0 a) O (D p Â·E '5.E .5 co - - E W (0 - 2 0 $ 1% M 1688 * 2 2 -2 ~ 2 2 Â·2 E mv 22 g05=Â£023 . . c) -Â¤ a. . u) .2 0.000.m.Em (0 -2 m . . . . 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 !-1 - 4 6.-2.22 . - f '' r .f c > c m- 16 m NEMa- 9 -Â¤ a E O (O 2 r b 8 Im Â·20.0 . 1 -3- , 10 C (0 (0 -2 E J CÂ»M - ; Â·,:-#tr *: 1,5 g 2189Â¤'2027 q J C Â·- 6 0 0 12 8 _ oc $1)16.* OL ~b tl ' 0 0 0 - : 5 <- rk. 1 1 *33 92 -1 3- Z .% 2 -2 E- g g i 5 r:i -, 0 Â£ iru 4. 1 0, + 0 .6 18 3 3 -.2 a) 0 0 mo okE :EMERE b E Er ~ E 2 -9 fr Z M 19 . r Z Â§ g Z & 2 72 5 : 41 LE if 0 B U) 2 * b 0 Z J >4 16 3 - -r. 4 tgO-0- -Â¤-gâ‚¬ u, Â£ 0, 7-kÂ· h. 2.- C. -0 25 u) 12 c e P ;T& T IN} 2% 2% ~1& 1 1 1 1 flo 41 I # 0 0 a> m n E Q 2 a '.. 0 > F Â° Â· 3 J O 0 0 Â· -1. 21% 7(~ : 73 11 C E E & m g 0 0 6, 0 iumg:8 0 r ~ 2 Ui 0 0 2 2 (D 2 m m n 2'*805550 %2 - O 1Â· H - COA-a- > . 11 -*- I (D 1. fr U) 4) 14 k 2< - 0 N (00 4. - 0, O 0 (1) O C u) O - 0 -C 0 k - 1.3 W O ro (D ro &- -C 0 -C Â¤) 1 5 (11 4, E o 9. f 2 E 8 J J Cl~~:i i e . 1- (0 - 0.0.-*vgo . I.. 4 L . BE R ccÂ·Â¤U)x>,D ~ f -51 2 2 .% fE % 41 2 Of :il 46 m tÂ» C 2.5 -b , =DE=u or (D-Yv 1114 00 <- e C3 2 -8 - =5 {0 fiv{01-62#:m* 2 0 0 5 E E ~-0-L e J -.4.- r--1 3~2 Â§2122 22 2 i E m EZ2*>,c 2 4 -5 4- 2 (0 a. m iii >4 IM g 0 41 Â» -2 ~ 6 ~ 0 2 E 2.2 CU c -O rn C Â· c< -E i '4, 1 ..a - O , D 05 v - V . UÂ£ 1 . E & 4 5 KE cm C 2 & 2 8 22 a 0 33*.2 @2 8 C E A CE 1 0 CE 0 0 11.1 282~ m 00 0 0 O 0 :2 6 0 8- 0 E to 0 rio 0 -I-- 1 n --:31- 1 ' ri --:I,t~â€ž,6.till''J'PL; 1;14Â¢ 8%,ti"A ,..t W 1 11((=.1110 129 W ill . : .: .Â·* 17'.1 ity M ' ti, 1.!1 4 .i?~Ii 1 za areas adjacent to create expanded outdoor o infill sites throughout buffers between cabins camp season. is for cNemistEnSard. it;L;;low 11 system. ubs an restore impacted e road s areas accessi parking area. The uld be sited in and accessible parking spaces. edestrian access and 'seeie 5upped pejeeuilep u! Buppec pue speoJ Iie 80 86el.16! Jeeu seaie lunLU 3 UOUI spunoJUeld pez!le oration with native trees, n area for pazis-uiqeo 0!lqnd J u!qeo Al!LUEY e41 u! pejeoo Allejjueo 'slededSAAeu ell} u! Illeisks a6eu6 41!oei X.'punel (Xed) 0!Iqnd s oeus 'SJUell14se483 'SU!qeo punoie seeie u! â€ž6uppeel o ezeid Joopino pue sMOea extende Cookout should ocations be 3 for camp participants. access and e Bunee Restrooms 141Â·tÂ·*-: t -Z 6 f-4-'..1 2 + 1,9*(rÂ·.-jif.-Â·.--rt. â‚¬ .Â·,-0414 2 Â¥ i e Rockies picnic space. additional restroom tilized for emergency access to remain as uosees-80 Joi S! Bu!>lied accessibilit . ' 0...6---3-:3 I a 1 E 69 1 11 &=D F K.Un i lÂ· 9 Â£ 42'1 f R.QUI . . 0 - 4, aa * 0 0 a E C 4- '05 0 1 >CO C co 28 22 5 CO C m .9 W -: C 3 m E. 2 I 4 3 2 *22 0 5 8 0 0 f â‚¬ 55 2 26 0- B 2 -2 * t - 38 ~ in la 9 0 i Z .5 2 Z (D CIO -C h c.= 0 0 - f % -5 2 1 #tg ~ .9 a J m 2 -O m g E b C) m U) 2 8 0 1 9 Bg~ -20- > 2# 2-2 - E -0 CD Â® E o b c i @ 2 > -0 q P & 00* -0.0 0 0 C CD Â·- 0 0 --- ms 0.- . 1% 28 c Co /~ 1 Q-"E r *~ rÂ° c 0 0 - 0.2-m Â£L Of 2 18 5 8.5 % 72 7 5 -C -C = - .i #% ig E 0 0 32 4) , *2 co 2 CE m CD C- C r 3 0 - O 0 Â¤) liz ~1802 0 c.0-0 O co . I lit2 f~Â§ m 4 , 8 u o 8,8 co CD o .%58 2-9 y f -Â§ 3 g 5 -0 3 -* :s Â·s e- m- m- * := 3 CrS Q) 1% 282sid- 0 392 Ning ocu-0 + Â®ro ; m ot -Qi Mo 2 co n.2.5 >0 3 a. 1~ {8 000 0 000 . i 1 +N, ' A. 4. Â¥ Go % 1% - 2, u -26 Â£Â£' 2, - E 2Â· O E g .E 2 -2 .E 9 co O (00 0 .(0 0 1 9 3 u. 2 -c LL <D 0 2 5 - m E n rio O 0 4-UL-W 2 m 2 3 2.2 3 R ir EO E rn c * 22 8@G 2â‚¬ , Â·?41 ... 2*22%@f ,?i . 000 0 lON 91 NVP US J li >, l'AItk I t' N 1 1 It [\,1 AN 1 1 11 PLAN the Rockips accommodate d/or outdoor Potential Fami Reunion Cabin locations near Guest Cabins. Replace some existing cabins, the Barclay an D annen Reunion Cabin sites. and remodel historic cabins and additional new historic sized ue doleAecl '96uippeAA 96.181 elepOLULUO 1 Jo }seAA Joi Bupped pejeeullep MeN Buppe 'siede4 pnE ep uiejunoIN r vehicles only during use times. P!suflunol/\I 041 10 }SeAA4]nos pue peoi Ule]SXS Hen lieleAO 841 01 loeull Je MoolleAO Ile]1 le]GAGS 'lunpequlnloo eq osie pinolis 'uo!1eledielu']g s~!Unpo~do ion Cabin locations near s in this area. Int int Outdoor Chapel. Develo r chapel and support facilities in lodging Reunion Cabin Sites Mountainside Area cessible trail from the lodge to the the same site for use as a retation with seatin . Iqeo @41 u! oeuuoo Reunion Cabin locations in the mmit area, south of Hitall union Cabin locations off of from the summit area. nside area and s umeo 00!unew ueuueo 1.2=.L ...1 22223="r. Z --.---r 1 ..4, 11 2 tk . â€¢d - 8 - - f vi a =ti.. . r T 1 1 + 1 4 f 3 161 - I 0 O a 3 X' U) i 0 E JO OO 2 % 2 0 - CD O f . n . 97. -- -1-9-:-r - 17==2 0 - - L -C B C 73 2 22 m a) c v - Cl U)- a> cO (D .=L =L . 5- T -C N N (1) 0 .. . C ~0 ~ - v UT O :af-92 0 O .05 - 92 -C U. c J > w, c (0 0 -L-k 3 2 0 -5 : 8 ai -2 4EE (0.0-a ca Â£@E ; M * 6 c E o in e d ang . 3 la==%= C 2 175 BE = a.cm :.Ji? Z - -52 0 -C E E 0 8 2 2 . I.t 12.-Â« r Â¥ ~@52*v O- '-' c (D .920{0 = I Â£(DE 2? ~ 25. ag 0 v ~E g ~05 9(1'Uii *-cu)23~ 6EZ~ a~ .V - t~~ 2 RE Al 5 EN *16 glf& 93 1ffs, EffE 2 ) i lE==coe._ EE 4- 33 (0 Co m Z LE a g 2 -2 : 2 -3- 1 1 3 1 3 2- -= 2 -2 --2 *A -2 O 0 -O m .. 5 1 E (1) 2 #0 3 5 2 mwkoa) U U) 2216Â£ >. E * ~ 31 i (D E Â£ E E # CO - 0 I.- z 2~2%2 2- m E 82 (0-0 (1) D 22 a.Â£ acE 1 2=3, , . W- :Iho : . 4 42â‚¬0 2 E Â£ 2 2 E 2 -92 05 2 92 11 i -6 ~ 3 -5 E (1)(2 2 6 - A % 8- .0 -0 ~ 2 8. E z D .52 (D m LL m c Â· 1:-1 -. 01' E (11 2 - 95 Â£ -, 0 -b v m .= 0 â‚¬ v= 4â‚¬ 5226(he , 0 v - m Â·- . 0-Â¤ 1 8 ~ 2 E -2 Â·% â‚¬ 1 M 0, E *0 -2 d Â·3 1 ~ ~ ~ 33 5 i ;3Â·t i p -7 . Z C) g. O 0-0 0.5 0 ~ ~ 8 5 -2 â‚¬.2 3 ~ p.g 2 6.- 0 6, C -,6 (00 . E t; 12 -Di -& E â‚¬-c 8 E 0, 2 5 -c, 92 c g ~:* B e. & & T .5 -2 ui 1 g E E 0 w ., fil to -U-eÂ® U, (0 C t 1 1 *cg@ E %2 (1) 2 -0 S EmÂ°â‚¬5*Nfoawomw...Â® r o m . LU,O i O (comE O c .2 M in ot-G wo 5 m a.2.5 >0 3 o r # m 0$0 O -1,2 JO O 0 0 0 0 0 ...4, 40 :22*99 - 6- L 92 3 tul 0-~ 0 NEE - 1 :El 0 0 0 ccc 8 6 0- : Â·11% F. ~ J 1% .2 -% Kill . - , 00 0 O U) 002 2 4 C.9 C C a) 'Al. ii c E ~3 ki ro J m -C - rdsrl 05 0 2 f CD ro 5 G. 56-oE F.... 1/4 .J - W Â·= U, Â·5 J = '97#~94 ic C7.6 30 0 @ i @E (Da) .148 . 71 t Â¥. t.Â» ~11- 0 2 -Â¤ 2' m > - C M 7 4- -I - =EgEijE2-Q , 5.P A,to 53' ,9.52 0 : =i c 10 1.1- E m -3 Z .g E 44:Ii -4 ..1 3 O 3 2 @2 2 R.E :El M C C W E O C C U) . , J..I . - ,2 82 CO 2 2 2 -5 v CON 02000 p 0- to-ja- u, m . - , '4 - t. -Â·Â·2' I 0 ..A E , 0 --21 a,ME -cattk (0 64--Un=- (D (D (D ~ cn,35- 2 $ 2 -5 O 0 . =3 U) (0 .- ro (1) > (D -- I. 20 0 0 l. 7-- i i :'. L- 2 -~~ 104PJHTES;: :Aâ€ž , 4.)& u.~, 4:6,2,â€¢ritij>41â€ž,OkB.k,1 4*' . '* /. t.;ji,h)1 lii"13,0.Â·.p. : r > Â·b~t~Ii:(ji:,ittll##044 i ,-1 4 1 ,Â·11 4/(F'.2 ER MASTER PLAN YMCA of the Rockies ' Â·ti~,tlt,i?j?}tÂ·W~ : r.i: .1 .13 > .- L . 9*9 l. ' - Relocate and construct new single family staff area at the south side of the site, w -Au.. Â·ZT;TFT' i,p . , h ;~:y-24 , ; i 1. . : rÂ·# f L.- 2Â·.T,:t Â·{'' Â· [Flut;Hu j.f FrA: .4'; bÂ®al.i Â· taff Housing e chapel. ad/trail and e6pol ep!su! e unoIN ell 1JO JSeAA4;n d/or ou d or small e4 1 JO 1SeM jOI hi toric Mounta s only Seve ju! J se!1!unpoddo 2& A~| ,174<4,Â£ il i 'Â·,4,;â‚¬12:.~ } Â·, 2 4 ~.1 .4,1 I A - , I 674+44 i le :fl; M F .4./VI & I "} 7 W ' S. ,... .2 1, ~'. 4Â· Â· . .i ./1/FÂ·'k 444J //4. , f - 2 Nâ€¢1 i < kNÂ¢ 5 6/ k. 'C A v . 6 Â· 4% C#48 ' I . Â· 93 . 1 w 7/I I 5 Iy'llig.-8 4 I . .N, .,L,Â¢* 1-1 ** d./=Rt 'f g i t I ,...,f 4 61.1 1 4 4./.2 k. P: .- 4-191 , -2 11 2,$6 h,b. - Â¥ I 4 .. I $ 4 *. 14401/5,~ 11'I:JI/-1- - I A 1514 1 '' 4 .- 9 - 1.' I â€¢:/. 1 + 7.*2 . * . kt zÂ£. 2--L#*: &11*,i- Â¢Y-':1*J g#* tr, . 2>2 2>kil , H 4 0 - 9 'A I , 6i.X . 7..4 t..5,4 Â· .* , I , -'.â€¢ e.&Â·Flt ~- ''33 . e. , 1/1,/P. .. 4 7//iR . t 4 1 4 *ek:'3441& iM:, 454%(Pelle#JA.YIB# F~tz.<* 3:6 4 . :a *'2:ir A- IdnALib k# =*-1<~2< :, 4 Ki'...~ "nf 1/~.~~ 0 #t -1 B e . ' - ' FlÂ¥0 r.1 + '47** 1 4 : . i. . I t.:.51, . , 44 .L , 1 t.14 4 * :. 4, - r -~i QPX $ 7 . 30, te & 4/ 1 - - 49 4- . I 2.r' . -. 141&- ' 1.~ ir:d,1-74 k 14.. =SL (4 1 L# 3 4:" ' 191'Er . 1 +St &140 4. Â¥ 1 f . 0 1 : 1 -*f k t : :4*I 8 1 3- 6. 4* , 9 4 . -r , 4 4 4 &,- , + 9.. :-41 4 . IM / I -Milrcfk#-2. 57 . 4 4 1 . 1 ...51 J . .. L e . 4 15Â¥1â€ž-1- I ' .. b..'+ -1 4 71Â· r 10 I , 4. N. 0 '' " Â·e ;: C . I ~. ,... r, â€¢ :/1 2 â€ž .Ul .. . I . . , ..,6.4 . 6 ' N t. . &-- . . .46 . 14 1 2, .... 14 .4. .4 - . 4 - . --7 4 4 14 . ' 4.../.' + $ . . - 6-:. i . - t. 0 .: 4 -1 . 1 1/:'ll# r 1 . . tr *1* 44 '' . 1 . 1.1"*5. 3. . . 7 4, : % . 2 + a i * 0 2, T 1 0 *A .1,14: ' 62" *f . , e '17*J 9.2 t...i $ 1 4 r 1 4 , 7.' 4 6~/i 4 '1*11 1 4.6, . 44# 4 : 7,#-p* rit :Â»)1.;.344,4,21$.Ijf; : 44~**2 â‚¬Â·'' # Ji, 1 4-1 - I + 4:IL/*76/UN 1. + & U j., 4 M .t. Ae'l., 4..3 :7 :c. I . ] t: Le/1,1. 494.* c, r fig.4//60 b. --- 1 a . I . ..'.73 1 I L - - C.44*,I *,2%5123627141/4 11.kit/0// 1 . 4 7 -, . =il 79.- A Â°1 Â· . 30 i. 1 4//1 . 16Â£ 11 Â· ' â€¢ WA. â€¢e 1 , .ir,â‚¬ '. 4. -IL . .TE .r- . 'u I ' ... .40 192 / 4 . 5, 4 .4 4 4 :r.Â¥%1, A 1. zit. 14& 17. & *Ip al Â· f'?20* 7/1. 41,40 -4 9 P, /4 . k. . 4 1 - ~4Â¢'2 * c ,<nit,4 j ,Â·4*, 4 ... t. & 1 51 0. . 3 A. , 0 7, 9 . . I I .4 $ 4.1.4 4 ' i t./. 4. ~ - 2. . ' f.. . a ...4 - I. 4 , *03 4 $ ip 342 7 4. i. 4 .. .... ., J , 0, .., r. / 1 . 4 . . . ti ' I .1. . * . 4 1 I . 4 ~ - i Â·:.~ i ~:.t =3,21- ~- 11.- 6-St*Exit. p - -- 9//Im..pu. t .=.2 -- ;5- 7 (\1 r A N c) C) 1~ : 11 - - - f.: L i &41 247 .1 j'.6 - 17--54,4-Â· *. .LÂ£-Â·~,=.it'-i~- =5 ./ Â· â€¢ ' 6, * . -2 08=: r t- 1 .- 1 1. t.' 24 5.9 = '. i i 41. *~Ii,+~4~< . : â€¢- 45' - : Â· FU-227 -- k:r ~i, i ,; rl a....mmin.l i.- .:, Â¥e 1 ---P ..2 0 ..11- ./ 42 Laur, - , , 4 rÂ·Â· -Ill~ -1 4 - - I - 4 MI J b P. L -tic' 4 -- 116.>~1..â€¢;91 ----M i 4 -2-12 -0 -1 2 2 91,1 0 7*-= 1 1 Â·; Co 0 2:--4 7.-/ -- . 5 929 0 .C 0 0 F 4 ikfl. 3 - 1 1.- 2 ii 463 CO .O ,; 451~ 42 ~ m C 0 : Â·m ** 'Don/1 01 91 c : 0 . L 0 Q 0 14.1 C LCC 00 t..10 03 0 13 2 O G) 71 Q I e.r m (0 (1) co 7~.-..a . Â· A. 9 0 cmQE a) (0 J) 4.-,9. B 2 5 CO â„¢ 1 b Â·~ En 0 1% e Â£ 0- 2 % JE â‚¬ 8 * 4.1 11 t .ell Zil '22 --1 G., 0, 0 : ..2.11=- .h * Fil 6., g (0 m S - :- O U L & C C L -,147 .... .-- ./ 2 0 0 IÂ« - Â· mP 0 E 4- =22 'f --; mE C â‚¬ 0 ~IZ L 1/8 a 4% 01 : AP 'A * 0 1 . E +10 4 0~ 12 1. 1 >< n /O ~ E- 2' Â¥2~ N t: 4 -*#- 0 9- 427# 4. ty 1 0 I e M ...4. 11, i r' M . f f.. 1 0 rL .., 0 Al 4 0 1 PAL'., 'U 2 4 f.f $ I .2~ j P f I. 4,/ '. /,I'. . M .7.- , . , J . ./ : *. e . 1 1 0 .:=...- ilk., ,. . ...1 ,, .. . - I. r * I. -71=2. - ' Z 21. iÂ·,4 44 *1~3?120,.Â· t'* Â·Â· 'i#J i ~4 i Â«I. 39 I 111 '' 7/; .fe.:. L 12Â·cÂ· :-%491 1. ,/4 , '. ~ ' '~f. ' 41,;t *â€¢9 -ZE.# -_ 11 1 .-VI.- 3 : 49# 1 - -----J '45== - 12*,1:17, ..4.1 0 7.7 .... Ar , 2 , I 62 -tr, 1% Â· 41!:b li â€¢ â€¢: E. & . ..A... 2 Â· 4.1.7 .1 b I -'. LEL:... r.zi-* - '1% i: ift. Â·4:-~35. Â·*i'REE:*,Ff'-I .. 1 2 7 - :I -UlA 6 k. . '.': 1 4/11:1:JAY-t?*t 1 1/ i < a . Â· ,/AS/VI//*1*RK/â€ž ,-di. 1 , :452-. - b -al , I , t i '.2 ....B/*,â€ž-41, I .' 01 . A y h.Â·#W -8." . , . 4 .2.- , ilr--1, - f =milf 9.,4# Â· 4>i......../. I - . 4'imir,-Ma its - i....1---' 0 ' 3 0 r t.4,4. 1.*Vil" I ** *dip./. - Il-r#B4 k 4. :' 'f,k 1 ' 40.4 -11,1.~up//aids' 4 54 -t.... -t- WW - I. px'llilim*/Â·M/....Â· i 1 9.-I.-1.= 2/ , :44 .AD-//1/-//''m.-33'.2/.'/* , lu.: 0 -- 1 1. 0 4 r:95. 71 43 CO 0 ~ m 0 32:- -- . i -- -- -il -- 2 4 0 L 14-, e CD 0 CO .6 0 .. 4 ir.:, 4 . 127 , 1 . 7.. .- -r - 0 / ...:11'' 9. - 4 104 f . . .t-2â€¢ 4 4, bo - 0 .#U 3....:: - 2 <ELIJ 4 L r ./ - 1 Â£0*11 M g h '14' 3 2 ~ u .C -0 4 4 1.2 4 --.-: 0 - =IN ==t . 14:1# g~ 29 0 W . p 2 i - O-=r= 0. A F; .,---I. Â¢ i ; '41%Â· 50 4 -8 -r -3 + 4 -- 1 â€¢ r -' r FhwiL, E 6 - - to *' es 2 0= C p 290% A 1. I. - Â© ri 0 .6- Ilit:lill + 8 ,- r Â·.2 ; W Biril'~ U AMA AL. *. I. 9 K . h A. (1 Th . I I=H - LI@=15 , 4<071 4 Â·1:727 , , =r=-1 1 f i. .1.11 .,111:li 1.1, r I *9. *p/,0/# U= L 1 - ,~ 4-1~ p p,1 -r --t --C= Â· S - 1 --12 -SL. It - 11''kili'll 1.; . 1~ 2 i ]11-1; LAI }1~1 -1'' 440~1.J jitf #,2 ~ft#!f'j 4 suoilduosea U.leOU Id Jelsevy eelÂ¥ 3300 Z ~4 '91'11.,Pit'ItÂ· l~,li;fillt,!14, I Â¥r 1.2'll' -12 A . 4 . 4 U .52 1 == .- -2 t. 2= aN te 1 0 2, â‚¬ 1 .t=: E- CE 52" 00 DE b u 3- B u M U 5. t ~ 22 &05 -0 >UgÂ·R U = 0 el u U .0 4>0 - U .5 a 2 4 M %Z= O . 9 8 5-8 U .C - 6. C O -2 to 2 8 3 r U U 01 E & 6 0 2 76 0% CNE >-1 9 20 e Uo E ,/ u m C 82% 2 UMK U u .0 ~0 O N * 4 ce 8 M N O E. M 2.- , 0 g to d.n %3 1% :40 .&2< CU 2 13 + 162 3-3 0 -0 tUU - CO-% + â‚¬2 E ft *0 - - ullu 8/2 2 c,5 Cn C 0 U U u - 4= 4* -2 .0.3 .2 + A.b .8 E H 6. M d U - > 2 2 -St * O cc 0 3 %>4 (10)- E % 4 E .8 4 K . - Ul N U 8 u. u ' .7=u 6.-,0 a & g ~ -5 9, n 1 .- 0 .0 - - 2 9 *E O = COE - = -O -0 2 2 Ic . 32 u d 4- 0 6-1 U e., U =- 2 4 â‚¬ o- 81 . 6 4 = v UD Ln = 4 45 6 4â€¢ 4% 4 2 g i * t 2 -0 Ch ~ tual-Â·21 C Cl g 009 -E20 uN 01 %2 . m d i 4 E en . M.5%02 jer.E Ba ggm.22 6. 0 . ~Ed %EN.12-0 Â°*a- =9 S E- mna.-=tn,; â‚¬ t b 0.- C *dits 5 0 2.LE~ Ews . 6. v cs<..- 2.9 3 0#-25=ts EAM 4* - ' U LIU .. U 4 6 U a d O : CS - Â·~ u Â¢7 U _ :-â€¢1 IL--I.; -- 0 g 5 : 2 & 0 3 -2 -5 O Â°imu .3 g tz :6 24. c=524--C -0 M U 6 0 6. O 6 U ..0 d a.1 0 W) M E E 0 . 2 U m u 00 .2 U >â€¢-C C U n ect >4 - M M S =3 -2 -E el 5 0 L ..Â¤ -C - W 0 - ... uqu 0- 00 UN Â£ ip Z 63 E 4. â‚¬=E Â¢ =u .- - : t llc .5 d 1(30-96Â·'<2 4- 8 Mu, Of 50 -C : 5 .- 6. 6. = 0 rh ~ 6. ~ O 0 1 - U + $/ . M 000 tg =220 + .-/ 9 - 6 C k .5 c . 0.0 .- rn n u .5 u.O 6. 9 0 92 0-'523 ..~ EFE Z t.3 .-0 U <4- di U u.2 .t * = 6 - 0-2 292 04 4 -i . 2 M U S &2 -0 1, b -89 t u -8 -2 -' -4 _ 1 - :.1. ./ =. / 6. _ --- d= 0 - -3- :_r 3.-:.-Â·r--'zh= 1 1 4 # 4 4 1 =4 4 -2 m 2 1% 4 / a nM 01 c o u= 04 2- -5 > U n '**UE QW 6. .-,0 -8 â‚¬ 5 C U 0 4%%â‚¬ r= -0 U AL 2 i 2 -9 2 1% 1 -E 2 2 t 4 cu U -0 'O UU= -0 04 0 -- = 7 4 -2 9 -2 1 2 & e 1= 0 IN Â¢ U aft 2 Z g J N f -a b u 29 0 0 u -5 6 E- A 6 0 -0 oma 0 - c 50-ou> 6 0 U 7 0 9 U 1/H a E -77 U u; U 6. - 8 0 0-0 .E a 0 -~t - 0 I_.../00 - s . 9- 4.2 -2 g 60 % - .= d 6 - 6 4. _ u -0 C sec! C W u. -2 -C o . - --- 0 4 d O O . 1 Bato-a. c .- d U - 9 6 0 0 -f % 3* =ul -C -Â¤ 4. = =20% 2 >t 1 Â·E R I MÂ·5.-032 I 0 0 0 0 - -- - = gEE 8 .%.M u 2-5- d* A -2 5- ~-U:* gi%2= h t H f = 3 0 - 9 - U N m @61 g - . 32 4 44 32 -E =â‚¬ 5 A PD , e 1- U--U -4. Ul â‚¬ ICS _ .2.- M E J -Â¤ c j a EE= a. E- U O,r~22 2 43% N. 39 - M 84 W â‚¬ C d u C. U 5 ~% 1*iE Gs Ca~~ 2 ~ PA~ la ~-1, & %@1 992 - 3, K 2 2 W 4 3 /{f --LZZ -. , U g 6 --1 L . .. C 4. @4>42 . O - Z *-0 -2 Â·3.2 W . ou * 13 O- 2 - -- 9 0 2 m E= 0 *1 b4g -OUS-2-1 CS 664 -0 .E C= CS U U -0 j /2 luz)6 = 9 KE al -c; co C - C -0 2 3 50 - a) 2 9 0 =ta= C . . L= 4: (0 (D O N â€¢4Â· m w O r (N C . CS < a U 2. I 0 *E Â·3% 2% 0.-Â·Woci.zoTN co 4 Some 3 7 7 2 .4 â‚¬ DE -2204 .g % >0 8 . 2 3 42 i g - LE h E ki) 4 2 5 35 cs .-12- aur= 9 6. 1 -O ~ 1â€¢%Â·- rol Â¤* 4) Em N U U M .Su O: . CONqWV-?40> - - --- -- ..<>-1 4 E â‚¬ i CS 920 & 4 0. 08 0 - 1 M g~ARRis,R$g E 00 7 U cct * 6. U U . U 4 0 6% PBERIGROÂ®REB A ur u 2 -2--*C -Â·- t- 7 tmE > a 1-. -- -2 0 E Y k.g C..2 9 c.2 Al@REFjo'#1820 - tit S - 0~1 .. 0 C 1 15 0 E Em fE M - N e (.0 0 M 0 0-> C\1 0 m 0 - co câ„¢ 4) 61 00 0. (.0 W - =EN -22 -2*2)5~ . CD ./2 C - 1 41 CO CD wes< aiRWE . ... --..â€ž-..% 2 2 .- f M .04 8 t tÂ·t O 0 0-6 9 0 0 k - a * 640 u =0 ComO-)43"Le le q m u 8 000000 000 --*--- i 04 0 +-t L u 4- % 9 5 2 -- -- i 0 .... , --- 7 dit=.25 8 + 3.2 E O 0 4 2 2 421.- 9- .-* = 6. E u â‚¬ .= 0 CS 0 10 N E m 4) 04 Â° m cr, Ul vt â‚¬ StD :10 u,% g.*i 4 * (\10 0 CNÂ· m ~ 22 g 3 Et *K2 2, 8 EL la ; 2. 60 -a Ji i â„¢ w " 61 .r w --. 1 - .= . 2- 1% #1 2 1 .3 3 4 4 1 1 -E f. -M -2 5 3 3 1 . U) w C; E 22:ME - LU LU LU LU LU LU LU U.1 LU E b 2 M N .5 Q -Alm*LOCOAMM 6- 6 -C = A- E- 0 2 - .-I 0 ME u C (D m 82 0 f Eg %m Bibg ~~ % 3 g i.%~22 3 28 M rt- A ' - 9 . - E ' 37 9.Â· . zy 11- 1 --- 1 4 ' 1Â·~1)'.1''ll)1?1}litt ,â€¢41ILiiKa|~11?l~/CieriYil docurn~th~theexhuig site dydrVAl~ " 0 Exs ngH doogy n' D anage Paue ns;t,~11'} 1 INC))3Â¥ 1 MVa 9001 â€¢nbnv he YMCA Estes Park Master Plan. section of t Drainage Master Plan will existing drainage patterns related to the Collect the st inch of rainfall runoff wherev ossible. In some cases, spatia ve the West ationa area and into 7011103 OA!1noox op pue 1[BUIS u S! 93 JA 00 j JA 09 J/[ 92 JA O L JA 9 1 1* C 'JUOA@ 19@K 'WOAO HUJU!81 UOA!& E UIOJJ U uni jo tpu! d uo supquo 041 150Â£H 041 uo su!131U USDIN JA!la A\oqu U 1! SU SOSBOJ UIOS S age features. The Drai iscusses specific a rea is und a run the Rockies. re 2.1 illustrates t and Tabl -FAOP 010111 01 UISEq 0108 OIZ 0018 1 IOO 01 1dtuouu sose) 05 I UJOUni Jo 40ul lsig 041.Jo OSEJOW JOJ AAOHE nter property can be broken down into the main property and the Summit rea, runo coefficient, disch m the 755 acre main pro drains to north to Gla r Creek and south generated by the first inch o oped parts of the property mostl ue in size a nows north into Descriptions od ulolsuo [[FloAO 041 Kq pougap se sloofold oinlru 41!A, Pole!00ssE sluoulaAO.Idul! O813u!81p 103 00ue E s! s!41 'PaqiIN 90 E-92 also flow fies d cients or valu igher infil and constructed runoff event is les ing drainage patterns, and to con entra control, and treat m z fl od- to discha t r Plan is implemented. atershed 2[ pulm 01 692 01 watershe v ue of 0. water'dl shoul *IHINa noe 1907 ~age lay u , addresses c drainage issuestand proposes drainage improvements to ier Creek joins with Wi at the northeast corn f the property. Th 4]son s OAOUID.1 'JOUU '10010 10!01?ID pUB JOAPPI pu!?A 01 08u!131p 01!S-UO U[01,1 Sulpeo I luOUII OS gonpow (Sp) Sluag Jee/[ X LUO#Mouna 1 #ouna SEL OLL f the Rockies Estes Park Ce ter rrent iss e property as detailed in the Estes Park ays and infrastructure from 25-year runoff. thin individua rainage Master Plan Kjoloipkn OBBU!8.Ia Sunspel Â£ 29l 11Wl.Uns - 1 r ..1 - - 7 - rÂ· Â· 2:-W--/ Â£533 29==7 - 50 1 ce - 6 - ..1 5 . 4 & 5 = 0 CS - 2 -1 -0 4.E : 3EEin 5 a .13 9--2 a ~ 11-M 0 M M 2 -6 0= O , CLE@ 1 2 > 00 a =.5 -0 t)JO O + 4 4- 6. C C . -- 3 74== - Ual g u -0 m @ 22- 2 ~ Â£~ 00 03 0 95 04-72 =Cd - - -p f .8 .: 00 0 U U .0 -0 .05 23 Sdilt b 6- -C U U CS .. â‚¬ M E + ' Â·UÂ·22 > 0,1 i --' 6 . U d U 4 ila 9 =-0 0 2 3 2 .2 * 1 --- 800 R -5 .O -1 % U -t'= 41 8 4 2 73 Eb CO . 5.0 0 7 tt t3/ 2 1% WEE 15 tes -tu t erk# C C ~12 2= -CLIE J=./.. >,2 M C-<Â·42Â£ =ti 80 Z 0 - 1.g .2 M 123Â¢ iff A 333 - 1 4 4 CE U U 2 4 M ~ E g ~. 6 -0 = =U 25 - -%-. osf /Fil = â‚¬-Ef EE -- 4 0 0 -9 9 94 Eu *+ 2.g Â·9.40 ORE 2Â·60 E -O 78 4- .C f- 10 0 9 6Â£26= ect c B Mcct -2 E 3 00 . - - -- V .- -C.-t- tv . C . . Â·'AÂ»â€¢-â€¢ 022. h R . 2.4 3 2 *0 3 > a u 6-I . : 7.....1 CP- 9% b =-5 0 - 11 1-1 -- Â·* Â· 51) Â·-- 6 11-EL- -5-04 a eU 3 g 1 0 err)=.. 0 k f.g 000 C 4. 2 M % 2 2 ; 9 .8 12 4 * -3 5 0=- - .- ce Eu C/% I .<D E 8 k - 1 0 = & 50' -9 2 ~000-=M gB 5 > C. t =r A - U 0 -0 5EEE E 8/ 3 2 < *f /3 3 2.6 9..5 U 50 0 73 > 2'REE.Mes d E O 5/2- 2 2 8 . m - 2 2 â‚¬ .5 2 a U 3/ MbÂ§ta 0 0.1 UO 21 4- U v- 09 6% Aâ‚¬ 82 22-~Zi__ .E & E -Ctu 18 % St~ a U 84 -E C u h .E).5 CO 0 8 M 0 8 42 b t: 6. E 6. = u U >,2 00 0 -2 1 U i , 8.4 -2 2 M . â‚¬ 62- 0 2 .35 a 2 = EP M CS I .$ Ill. -2-8 3 â‚¬ g E Â§34% U Ef 4 9Â« U U U 4- R KS O 6 E u 2 0 cri :.f>:4 .- 2@23 2~23 090-00 = C 5 0.% C M w =4 5 w 8 -~ 2 E-5 a. Co 9 mt . 3 ,-A K Â¥ ../...n C t U NE U j . 0 U -7 0 -R= Erili 513-1 2-52 11 4 00 g 60% M 0 5 -0 -0 O 2 0Â¢050 E > 4-*- 43 6 4- - 9 = 0 0 0 P -C-*I .- 0 4.- 3=22 O -5 o 0-13 M u .2 d Emrn * 2 53 5 -Â¤ 0 g.2 U fE C~ 6. -8 5 a z 3 2 0. * < 9 + O 2% 2 E .2 =019â‚¬ 12 -2 0 ZE@8 wwo 0 2 2 3 4% % 2 3922 C t=' CE ce * 2 2-E<-8- ig M C. .E 22 0 8 2 ou=* 2 - -tu~ d C ;-1 1,9 -0 93/u .7,-= W a.5 4 N Â©4â‚¬ g *r.i d Z % u A 61â‚¬ 4 ce -C es -2 2 --2-=-- Â»52 = 0 eD '--- 1 3 82 0 0 -6 2 2 2 % *. 7 .h ..1 Aâ€¢ â‚¬ 5 4-2 31 W<Â° cm: ir / IE: =2- -:39:9 ' r. . - Ch .' , I ./1, , , E - *........... ....U-4 4% UJ 4. 1 *f . :73% 2 2.74Â»3-4 4 : f \ , i . 24.2 +42.9 .- 1 . t. I . ... F 4 3 +4Â·, I,- t& 1. t. d K . 0 -0 esc t .0 Ngg - I - I ZA=; . 0 m .5 50 C =3 -= --/1114 r -- =13. f "4*LA 740 - . ~*it -, W 8 P a 44 633% 429 ...' a. % E ... , -1 w r. a . 1 1 1 , --6.-rt Â® - ge-1 + =-LI U 1, i I.*. ..7Â· p. #F. A.1 .' ''.+ , . . @ \ 4-I-'.4t 2 11,4 4. t~ .- r s ' 4 '",5,1 .D>â€ž./ - t.f' '4,4 , 2 :114 a ./.... Â·Â· 9354:13 Â·4.1- -- 1.--3 *Et Ar - \ 4. -- .- . -4- - -- 4........ -1.4. .. U : JE -4 ... 4.4,. t\ t / . 'A 510 CS f. 0 h. b , el 'li 1 -2=ru 40. 91 W c 05 , 6. - - ..4,â€¢ A - ' -- m: :2 /ty) 0 'wâ€¢ . .i 6 1 r ..2 -=722.-- - *23 & ... ar. . U.Z. 12=42 =: =r=- - ... .- p /Â© 1-al I le' 1 1 %,-.6- 0 O - N U ts U %-8 a v S C d 8 & 2 8 0 2- 60 M U . => UCC i A/Qi b Q Â· O .td U l . 1 1 1- r N Z . I. I ' 0 00 . 240 - . , . ' i r '040' 10 , . ..1 - ---- 12=l M.- .1 4. *.. 23:- ZZL#- 2 1 Z = 4._ C 109?'AllittiÂ·, 0 ' ind River. This the Y]VI~of steep coun- main pr lies outsi Coordination of the r view of pOHEO 018 U.IDOUO le!0OSSE 941 ole.IlsniI! Z-9604 *IliNSI August 2006 INOD ]V I AAV(]3 U.IDOUOO O Jo 4~0S~oll m p@ZIS OJOAA~~nolue s[09uZuip Z!0 8uipn'P K: 018 U!U UOO Sp@4SJol SO.Inion.Ils 05041, LUJOT UOAIS J I[EJUIE.I 40u! JIB4 ls.Ig q pale.IOUOS OUnl Jo OUIn~OA 1BOA JOUnl 'Eole BJ.InS SOZIJBUIUInS I T dold 041 'POW!1110[ O SEOJE 041 00uo awa-qns" oso41 Jo qoe 1 'Â£ uo!10@S u! Pal!.Flop 018 sso.Ippe 01 popuolu! 9.19 K DOUOO ugluoos@101!0 on' 3.0 Areas of Conc Ou! so.Inion.Ils O!ine problem are s. 206 L eouis sail Lti . j Aft : I illk.,1, -': "i!:95 11rlrL...vi."A."M"" .loqulnN u,!SEE[ O!80loipKH .f,.. r,~- I.I. , f.- I, -,6,13-Mir ' I E O.InS!3 -131 mi c/VA quic rk#61,4,~4/116\,//904,*9--- -pâ€ž3* ,/uk *42*fi 34. ia ' 4~-- f/" d.13 1.I Â» P. h t ~3/33Â» Â·'i' 1!1 '1 1 4 4 -1----I--I- 94 1 . 44 64 - 'j.1 -4 - m. - Di U-< 3,3:1~1 z/i~'~4~" ./. , . 0 0 â€¢ 16 11 %0 4,4 ~Â©~.41\ \LÂ· . -' r, 'RE - -,A '1.,- f.\~~{lÂ»'}11 1 '. A ;., 11 1,1 .f .,i,Â·,1'!:'#1/,1 * Illf .h 4 ... t , *2~13+EL- i 00 High-Kay 66 0 4 2 1 N 0-/ E ..% 2 . 4 -/.2_*1-7 . *'42Â»I . ; I E ~ -0 45/211#rk,M*i-,lit .... . U , 0 '0 0 ..-, q Â¢41 . 4 . Â· 1 . L \ Â· . . 32 75; 2*; , U E . T . 0 7 -=2-54. 1.4.& 1 .0 V -- 73*-4 g . Â© 4 r i ./ ' 4, E illÂ»--2 . I. 47 U . . . .- 0 - . - . 64 0 k 4.41154\: r 9 9* + . ..,> a 1.X, 1%%4:1 1 0Â·>t 3% ' :.i , - 91 - . 8 0 .. .. . . I -1/.j - 0 +P' 9 + e , . .4 9 0 . 'I ---/Ir 'W~. 4 . a - C. I-.I Vica ., ..4 "w . . k--- . * 4 +7 4 1 m .. 1 . 4 ./C . 0 . .. . 1 70 . a &1 t. e . .. . . .18 1 11 N *11&/ti 1 4 3 j.. = 25 / 'f . . . â€¢2~,U, dr : . 48 . 4 000 8. - 22*, .1:li. Â· . 4 1 '1.1 . "- 44..CtÂ·11_U, . , 0% 0 0 - 0 4 1 9 . . 1.1 $ 1 . 2 -_.33*Al#:'i,VNL 111 0 4 , - - -444.Â·11 â€¢4.â€¢ . Â£~.1:44...'W *ty,Â· 4 ,Â·. . fulmew -r'"/' , 'It ' 4 Hrrr W 1 . i.-3.3-VE#*imb/7.. Â» 1 fiÂ«Â«uÂ¥/i 4 41 'r 24,1,4, . \Â·. ~Tot . " 'lf -~43-: 7,-f 24 ~ -i i a CA: j..f:if 4: . 109*EVL,Whop. 0. . - I ..16,-:1 4. ..1 4, #Inl,n../4.,9. 12=1_- ast\***K;1 -&......... I 01*Yi hear-.; Alijadip* fan~.Ant#Â· * I -- 31. <lawdim#latti: 1 . C'/4'*14 U ik ., -W----0. I. 1448,0?<vft.-019'- 92.=12 m. 4:.*T ~: r'' .:- 4... :-1./-//1 f L.I.in_ rz~'1}.,4<-Â·,ar-' '4; --/ I.â€¢IMM./*4Â·-Â·Il / grag. /4. 900z 1sn6nv 1MVCI H s 4 - T- --7-1-,1-,TIL -F: 'Â·il-'1Â· H -Â·7Â·U. i." Â·Â· .-Ir"rrTT"-771-7--177 ar-TFÂ·77=-"-Trril ~3~-r,----gl~-,r. F - - (Bolv 1!tutuns) su!SEE[ O813uiu.la Bolv uloouoo 'q 1 *i~ O.Inju MaiNg[) d SlLSS[ 1-06 L @Quis se!l!Wed pue SaOUelaiuoo 6uiA'es Q~ = dbcfs SUISEEI OSBUIBia BO.IV U.IJOUOD 'U I Â£ 0.InS!:1 2 ZEÂ»El: - -- â€¢r..1. . ../ , low 3~ Jtl ....-. -07\ 4-b f / mill 15./1 1-th :Spy. b f $ 31 it 1,7: 5 . . O bÂ· -Â· .1 . "* '92 /5 w ....=2 . J K :72 9 â‚¬ 5-91 B *23'. f -- \ - le- 1. '1 :. 1~ Â·-et-- 0 m -, . . ... . ...v!. -~=.- - 213â‚¬j:-ingÂ·:-. 1-:412 li-*I~.* - - %~ E \ -- --t.-LA- -a-- JEalk=282:Z 317 4 .,1 - a - re T- .. k=*44 --. ..........-'. // .- 0 - r X. - 1 . .. I *.-91 r. C,D .-:- 521*1= 4 E ..0 1,'.414- M 01.17.. -.-r .- -tz> 9 . // = =n= - 44 01 - - ... cs - * 1 % $ --1 â‚¬- -. 52- - -A , 1 I ..U. I 3 4 1 CO CD - 0 -0 AX . 4 4 09 0 = U 6. tq CD tU 0 00 t.â‚¬ L. ht. -4 d Ou 7 12=22== 4 9 *.0 ' 4 3 :0 R JE D 6 M re,a - C 2--. - cs . 9 U~ * 0 4 = O 0 - 4 tn u -e - . C/) 06.A li f 02 / h l/-3 4. 1â€ž4'Joho F r .- - M 2 m H 23 m OJ 0 49 OU 4. F 0--9 1 g ch t CO 32 NE U-Â·- . 4. 6 E - - A gu 01 =%61 4 50 E 4/. 11 0 5 2 *4 26â‚¬â‚¬ r 0 0-C - 1 4 9 4 N 0.1 u .- 294 - I =Ma * = url 2 16 u * A CS 7- 0 /6 2 g ... = 2 - b U . - 5 -> . UM . 47 . 6. .. 0 50 F t o Oo <2 M - 4 w E L 7,11, .- en 33 5 1/2 ME, ER -0 t -1:X Â£3 3 ---. â‚¬ O 0 - U Vi E 50 9 5 2 9 -6 -2 73 g 1M JM Ji E.E 05 2 8 -6 420 0-1 K=Cat 2 3 U .5 U. U Â© r Un/37 --Â© U 1-C 0- ..5 4= t. R 1- 4> 5-* I . -2,9 8 4 0 49 .ir ke w < 01 00 01 -4Â· 0 (.0(N M ki-) AmmID- .-* ; 4 :-2 i ~ - - rs'-- bu -003-juio.Nm=-Noor Pair - r a>o ..I-. -U ... W ~:-/.4 5 3 ,- L CS 1 1 -,1 g p -LL 2 -7- a 2 0 , =U -4 20 50 ./ -. * ..â€ž. , 82 1 -1-11 ' 33-S 1 :8 = 9 E R 5 3 5 21 9 8114 18 15:0 . _12- = - -' 24 . = 44 I 1â€ž 31'it'~ip/.71. .1'. 610 - ./.M - 0-05: !Â·Q Lo =loggic,.00 ' .~--4,- _2 .1 ~ * em-222(NUC,Utew-(N- .>44 1 mi c -- - - /...... ./.I + - -2 1 ~~,8 - - 2,12? 0 10/..4) u *'4~*il - - . 99, 14Â¢1 1 4~~~,97 & * w m w 4 9 a 8 2 2 5 2 5 61 1 6 .- ,... - LU I i Al a3 At- t x 6 Â¥-i .1 1 , 6. + ~~,~ \ii~i~iif ~ ffÂ¢* - 'N ~R-65~~REB@923:trig -- & Yi . b 6 M- r Q: & me COMRER Qi 28]2:=teR] i C . 1 -0 540 --0.5 Eigi g .E 1 6- oct CS U U -C u 2 27 K .5 70 o 50 = M -0 = rb - .- 1-2 0 i Â·12 ze gp 1 6 8 -5.j Z ' 6 0-=S 3 88=EE- a E-2 $ f J 3 4 2 % 5 - 50 . 0 29.6~092*GEQ!009Pe u # v Â·5 - 0.5 3.2 E Na e.bows te f O 1 # 25 41 1 -8 *8 0 -C ACC a . U -= I- R SEE -8 >1:3 2 = 1 p -3 .9 E -8 â‚¬ f 84 9% E z 45 , /1 6 ff '2.5 2 2 St Et NE hi /O : 3 2 =- Q -- 0 2-02-3,88* E F 59 8 -0 .- . -- 3 EM geou-8 Â£ a. 2 . to=O 231~i Fact 8 81-10: 1 62 4 0 Su -0 24..'=n 6 3== O 008 0 9 E- ty-Â·- U Â·Â·=O 00000000000000 4 .St i wfli 5 00 U , CC C 9 'g~ catommnmm rommnlow le 4- : CE:0 .E .99 *i 2 2 M d 0 3 2 REcuMEE =2=0 O Q A h ocnhmle 0! 000000! H u*2242@ Â·~ 2*Â·2 ~* 06. e 39 2.- 2.-4 * ~ ~4 5 1%25kiNG&9% EN (d cri K 2 u 0 .E 0 # 2 4.0 0 â‚¬ E A â‚¬ E g ..1 u = O % 6 2 4 792 9 1 6 -0 2 --~~ 79= = 2,:c: W .- - S E *t O .Em 50 0 5 Â·Â· - 04 m . 4) co N 00 6) 9 = 93 2 Z U 2 * 'b .2~ 2 ~ .5 .2 2 ~ A .E .--- E - 0 8. =.E U C g 1 0 I ti O 16 E - 2.S I M - 21=.7 I _ U f G'~ Cct 6 40 a e Zo .0 11 0 k 3 li 27 11 g 13 z u Â·- 6 W 60 P CS U 61) t u .= S -6 0 b H -.- 9 0 E= -2 -0 O-0 U U . ..C -% 4 =*9 0 L i 1# O * CO m E * i. - J, .54'/,4/'#lipirF,~ ./. .43 j - .... 1 C .14 + 0 . =1 cc .. U U S 50 . R E &.1 *- 22 -3 -= 3 -1 - 12 t -12 ,-U w - 0 - C W O t- ; U .- 6 0 C . - -2 - U = 0 = 88 2 E bt o ./ -0 - U E - /0 *= V-- I /9 i-4,3 j \ 10 'SENE Ul@Iq DiBACS, g. 1 A 018 ]JOUn.I .InoK-52 0 1.1 1 4/tliti l. : 6..7.6: 18~" inside and Kallenberg inter- pue opisulelunopuo uo!100Slolu! opulâ‚¬) :uo!1nloS 1111Nfl MJIVd SS[.LSV 4Ft 206 L eou!9 se!1!Wed pue seou@J@Juoo 6u!Alas Al UO!1005.IMU! UIO.14 OA!]a -S!P SJ JOAO JAIJ snduleo nl 1130X OUni I[13 -5/ 'lsoM 11104 s! AAOIA .8018 JO <1!u! ) 8 dn Hy H!* I 01 g s! sidu 1!nq u!mu 041 snduiel nl HEJUIEl pUBpOAO : AO Il!~ (Slug 118jit~u,i_Â£4 ,-i ~~,--~Â· j. 1 ~i ' --. -- - 2 no / , i ' / y 2 1 1 5 0 -1 2 - V<.-1 - .* E 1 C _cs-- -N / 3,,-7:r 6. d A- .. t 2, 9. -0 > C 1 - - \\ O 9 0 // 8,/ i 00 (. 5 - U U 0 U. = 0 -- \ - 3 h \ 42 0 :- -0 -0 1 h E .% -1-- 2 ' 1 . . d a - U 8 *2 '..I-+ 43 Ch E il . -- .lill 4 R Ud %/O A U -9 0 - IL l. / 9 -*.- â€¢t. 6.c ~.~. ---. .- - . - 0 E:t?-e. -Â«.. 4 - , i 1 â‚¬ 11\Â« U .C > CS 43, Ng 9- =2 J 9 2FsÂ·E{E g 9\ \ 0 6. U up a \ 5 6 >t - m -0 .E \ -'Ler * 50 - El .E -- 3 0 29 0 2 â‚¬1 v- 73\ ,# E , 4/ U'UN AL U . 8 8 7 h 29 Of) U . -- A - & - 5 1 N , --1/ E =- : -9- -3 . s r Y 2 2 1 j n ' 1 3 d E ,/ - 2 u 2.2 r .5 * 0 Z-- 2 -2- G g 2 -1 2 . ~ (2 4 1% t = 1// ~.% /- c. U O ---8 12 Â¢ Eu 8 : 2 0 0 , 00 0 u. O - _ C 1,~-7 -3 - 'h =124 M ij =7 * 2 40 M - C / 1 Â¢ - - 6 0 X C ... U - S g Cd UJ @3 2 6- Al = d 4 iC - 2 ...- r 0. ~ E % 2 66 9 U .32 1 tz .52 20 5 1 53*1 f 40 0 - g â‚¬13- 0 CS = =- z hy t- 0 - 0 0 66 -8 u -Â·- C. Esk 0 -0 I 9.1 g ~ ~ 3 '3 2 13 5 -8 (0 -,0 I 3- - 't_ 6. 00 6.- 6 0 4 l. \ 50 W O.5 -3 .3 ....2 01) 6. ==S:- 2< W m. U~ f c,3 2 ic=. chm C/) co , C \\ iE U /O 1 4-ir- 12 -46 5/ *Il .. Ra @i@ CS 0 0 - 0 - O = E 3-i i LE 9% 22 5 A = M 2 u M P = C. 4 9 8 -2 7 -t K :r :Z u O ion- 2 EL= t - 65 2 7 272- 1 K = C M 2-2-L 0 4- 1 . .... .. ..=. E O :-4 Â·-/9. -s-Â·Â·t;Â§- - .127:4. fo:.562-1- - 8 7 2 89 = 0 en MA -.3-2.2-53,:5Â· **Â· -O E Y Z 8 * 53 12 2 1 2 8 Â»-9 9231 91 ... g .E 2 2 Z C .2 AL U C 231 L .0 U 2 1.2 6 en s > CC , --2 1*2~et= 3 / 4 R i - -22-23=- mil . rl M 0 50 E * 6.6 .99.5 U M <Ezig UD 92/. 7 22 â€¢. 0 3 4 3 . 21 C .- g.~ 1 -5 *% g..E f r# i-~7 50 . mt - 4 21 N JE %8 3 , LED -3 8 4 cs- 0 -2 tb 60 K 2 9 11 22- 3 1 U p %C .. 0 2 U CO C U U 0 U 62 6 0 O 1 9 04 .~ 2 5 01 . -\ 11 *-.%. 0 - A V M U .f E 74-k c=- 2 - ... 1, 4 3 --- 1- A * 91 4- O Lg 8JO= 2 - <Â· ~ 2 â‚¬ 8 -H 01 M %36 c,; 612 torq W U = W. U 2 2 0- ZE 232@St 0 0 C= 2 ee le=- m L-- 2 ,l 6%3â‚¬4â‚¬ 4 Â£ <Â£25 i 4 0 2 2 - knot: - C- -- 2 1 3 iÂ·'' 1. -- ",1,11 ,â€ž7 Â»â€ž12â€ž9* (t' 91â€¢(1(jr 11 contain rate drop structure 3 1 ;t,t , 2 : and th@t~f~~~~~0J'H *~# .., 0)3V ~ M90 4 vent and sl his area. 4: Near the Chipeta and Wapiti Cab n . miles west from the intersection of Mountainside Drive and Mineral rive and Elk Avenue. north/northwest from the intersection with the silting problems. A .4 and approximately inch ,rade the area to ensure that di Eolv ooueuolu!9]Al 010!4@A J culvert is undersized, 941 Jo VOINA crossings along and u etention basin size , Â¢ Ct i uee#uoo Buwes .620 111.4,{11 1 05/ly. Â·Â· - series of basins, as olume of 0.63 acre-feet Add a silt basin to this area. nch of arge two tenths of an acr -fc em: Rainfall runoff creates a saturated zone in this vicinity. Discharge from a 25- year runoff Solution: Broaden the by the cabins to create a defined drainage path. A 10' w s area. A silt basin big en in an d let the se im aP!su!elunoIN Jo UOUOOSJolu! 041 UIO.Ij lsroilinos soptu Z O 01 ro Kiole,u!xoidde OATia es@IN :9 110-Iv pue 'sjo Â§Â£ I inoqu s! 0%1840sip JeoK-gE Â·Poz!SJOpun S! 1-IOAInO OA!1 a =Irr:unit-rz:2121'J -92 13 UIC).U SJO OE 1noqu s! 081940s!a 'puoi Jo SUO!100% A701 THE S! luoiuoked 041 :1110Iqold 0.022) will convey ade the ditch al g Mo o tom width, 2: 1 side s is approximately 90 cfs, and the local slope is 9%. swale with flat 10:1 sideslopes and 1 foot deepwill containthe 0101! 3 KOSJOCI JO Tua lsnfoA!Â·la ESDIA[ :9 gaiÂ¥ ,JG Eso]N lopun SkioU K@AU00 011.I@Aino d]NO 6,8 I UE [[Elsul :uoilnloS <1 wi~ ~ ili i $ r'/ 41 11' i; -1Â§1 :i.; 1 4 r- .:gbi.fi LIMM 11- Er '414~if; :i'.1,2.T: ~ t'.41*16:~ri<~ i ~' 3: Between Rainbow Drive and Do Runoff deposits sediment in TIOA[no dIA[O â€žEf 13 t[WA WOAIn, 8U! ls!xo ooEICION :uounlos t hal f inch of rain from the be adequate for this purpose. aill pUU 'Bole S!41 u! luOAO leaK OA!la ESOIN pUB DAIJa 3 7. -3 =.33045*215 221-4 1 4 4 'E -9 . 77% ER kys- i 21 W -1 d 1 r.2 - CO C rEE- '; 4. 1 - N -0 M 0 - Â£ 32 0 CS .2 k 5 2 4 0*tt *--/*.. %â‚¬ . 2. 2--IES-- .2 E e g 2 ~- 3 . out S t- 2.22 -0 = - n â‚¬ ~ ~ g Â£ â‚¬ C co 4 -r C . h = N .5 F A E 0 k =au -a U Ch M 440 6 0 0 * 71 , , 1: Â·*imi - - 0 m g 0 - U U 6 0 4 la CS u - 2 .- IC U 0 5 0 0 U O 7 :Â·.' ,;; I ~ '~ j Â·22 8 4 9 2 -0 4 5 1 = 4: e O.29 O 0 9 7%*4*' M 0 5/.for -0 ' *--21222: 5 1 1,4 4= , .... 1~1 -0 4- 0 >4 - 6.2 01= , -- 0/14 t -- li i.? -t . es t U â€¢- 9 - $4/0,5 .4 5829 1 US U ~ U A ' 1 U ' z --+ ce 9- . 14M.- * >0 CS 0 4. 6. .- 0 - -- E .92 +--'6=0 0 6. 0 2 â€ž i~- 52 =gle /2 0= 11 U - 4 Â£ +4- f I jr..'ll C -rk C A- â€¢ 1 PME 0 6 2' C ..5 â‚¬ 2,5 5 3.5 .% 5 %) C -0 -- 4 t:)40 -C 228-+ i 4.1 @st Ek i j. . ce -O 1 5 -c .5 u U 92 - U u 42 ' 2 - ./. - W .1 0 = = ce -O u , U Ao O - t- - 6 U C Al = ~* 2 0 a -,I /4 4-Il-'1' 12:4%5#0% . - 4- 60.- U . 60 0 - 0 05 O 0 99 * C â‚¬ u d U ..=Ds:P - 3~Â§2&1 tm 52-PE . .41 t . L Lul U ~ & -O 2 00 acc EF ~w - - C * ./1 0 - 9-: 2 -: U 1.-3 = a U M =2.e- 2=.==sm..2 '1 u.,~ C i E 0 5 0 -0 â‚¬ U - --- :\ ZE -8 -2--1-:3 - 0 CS E e U A OO t b 1= 3 C 00 CS W 2 50 C 0 Z U 22.='--1*' -0 u COE - t.2 *72 . Â·11 Â·piÂ·ki~I 5 b C . <2 .4 79 , .- -.3 -0 -0 9 . . P .i % CS 7-21 - -C C 2- Ze * 1 2 -2 CS, JE - i :2 2 -9 2 1% 2 2 1 4 â‚¬ 1 M U O. Â·G B O. Ou. - 9 0 9 U 6. 0 0 u h 1 00 - 2 .--I Ar, c ~ 10Â¢1 / &0 U. >2 5 - .- Â£ 5Â·~'5 Â·' 5 2 71 I '3 1 - ~%Â§1 2 E . 4.Wit- . Â·.i. Â· 1 -, L ... /4 f . : 7 7 -- ~ 2= 2,5 C '~ ~ - iii 22 . m it -I... 4 . I h S g :3 - --- - --/ 1 600 33 - 6 N 0 0 ti ~1~ _ i .-1236 - .E.~ ... 3 2% 3 -1 1 2 7, 0 4 d .. 0 + .3 0 -n - - = 4 U w ~ 2922>002 ~Ef & - U - Â· 4 5 - 2 45* -Â£93 -2 0 -O 0 . 0 9 - ZOO - ... 0 0 0 es C O 42% â€¢- C 00 0 0 - 4-SIN. - . I j..LEdi 2 ./ ==041- - 7-Int - E 23 8 . 3 k: 9.6 .5 + 1= 92 0 N 28 6 0 0 = . - - 4 . 1'-t -0 -0 --- 04& to E 3 E . 4 32.-*97* - & 8 9 - -a - 4-1 .. , . - - 1 *1 -4 0 1=ZE. 4/ - crl 1 2 -3-* 6 70 N % 45 ; ~*; -222 =r.Â·-f": 1 *-*-AL#-42 -- 1 U E M 6 1 32 g Â« f .- - C 1 0 4 0 Â· 1 6 22 E . . - I. 1 - e.. .1 ... 7 '44.2. 1 . 0100 4 7 1 33# 4*1% I 00 CS 7) -* 2. 3 2 / & 0 1Â· , m . tri 8 4 3 O.2 ./*- 1 1 9 2 . r ~ 8 f " - M $ - 2 -4 U - U U V - . 0 0 .. 4 1 lialt .3 ..../.1/ 15 2=* 1 E E < -6 - E O â‚¬ v r- u .5 3 .-0 '1 -+ 4- 'fi: J :*p-- 4-'z" u -.- 4 19 .44 1 f . t Â· 11 0 O - 60 E â‚¬ 8. C 0 C . .flk 0 . , 9 R 0 2 -O â‚¬ M > - I . 9 ,) .9- :1 8 2 . U .45 ..@ 1 1% -- 60 .22 0 00 - 1 - k . r 2 2 .2 32 -2 4- I C M 3 0.C U E 2 2 8.5 % 3 .6 % d 41 C/D . 3 1# 22* .g . cs 2 Z . m o U 5 g â‚¬ 2 5 E. 9 Â· t: E C u t= E d ~~4 7 U 0 eec ./ =0 2 > 4 t.: 1 -- U U U 6.0 EN@ 1 3 N .i ./ 1 --- Â· . I U - â‚¬E d W . 5 8 b~ U - . -2 0 0 4, .- .D I- 01 -Â·- -5 = M :6 2 CU .2 = 2.-M . 41 2 58 U * 1 E .9 9 u 0. C . 4 6 CO .E z .58 EEâ‚¬ B E- E:~ 1 .. , 44 - < . C . Â·Â· 8 2 Â·Â· Â·Â· i w %3 1 20 + ZE- .= AM - 8 .2 1 . 4 ..' .... I 22 2 20 0 a = 0 * NE .*.4 1- O 4 4 14 Â£ 2 3 % @ 12 RE & 8 - -,2 ' - 7Â·:Â· -7- : 2 4 7==31 1 2-2.22= -- --- ..31-7- -Â·.1---792 157 -- - -2, A J =- =S % ./.i. - =In==+ 2 900z An611Â¥ oP!s I:01 41!a OP!* cE I pu P '90 plutu! puUIJOA~UU 17%142%13: Â°2iÂ°Gllqf'% F-r~Hur-1.-7-"7 902 }noqu s ! OA'Ja Die S!11 'UIEN 1SUAAOp pUBilo pun s )6 -SIG 11018 S!41 u! lioun.I Joll?Ai X0 s! 0 ..IC[ OP'supulunoIN :ulglqO.Id 'SOApa S.IoqualleN unoIN jo UO!100SJ0 u 01 posodxo s! OA'la op[Su!Elunohi :UIO[qold eq 041 Jo JU[nlOA 0 oUJUS![E-01 Op!sU ueld JolsupV 041 SE pOpel 4 uni loal[ol :uou iuu!13JP Jo Â£/3 ls133 PISIALNJIO N}IVd SSIAESS[ L06 L eou!@ se!1!Ule:1 pue SeOUaJeJuoo 6u!Ala SOPPOH 941 JO VOINA structures, or add impound- X4444 B i 1, 7 y. J-li--~,1:$1Hlit}lit-~}VI- 0,1111 If - . - 21 -2 =y':23 4 1 .15= t - .C t 2 51)FE -2 -0 - â‚¬ 4- 4 :.fag a m & .2 E -0 1 4 - W .2222 9 9 W , & 0 6 .3 41 2 U .E E ~ 0 = EPS :-3 /6 = -c, â‚¬ E N .8 2 -.E A 2 0 0 * f 7; 4 Â·704= : 0 - Y Lf) p V CDC 01 L.* M - 0 0 0 0 0 0 (N 4% 55 ~â‚¬EE ~33%Â£# ~- u 4 4- 60 0 0 ~ 2 - N. - 0 A Cl U -0 O 9 CS 0 9 E L E H i. K -3 0 -8 3 -@ â‚¬ i Â·E 2 2 Lg .~ O -O O =r 00 - .- 0200 E d 13 :3 .M = 4, 4- V 4 - A O . 1 -2 -- 1 2 OEmt 3 =0 m u= 2 2 ~ E.I 1---~.. 43=u (4Â·td 44 u .2 E .5 2 u ... U 20=2g E g) 3 % = CS .O - - E :g :3 co 2 81 c:n lE R 8 01. 60 C,j u g M im .S c UÂ»Cur U Â·- 50 A M A C A O-0 2 0 . 0 70 u E o= . 2 0 -m 2 2 0 t -6 2 # C' -3 44 -6' -0 -Â·1 .2 2 CO 0 0 u E co 7.-6 -3 - 0 CC -'U#20 K U U 5- , ut :E. 1 ge g li. 006 - ~ Lfls?q 038@;G 9 -2 3 ~ Z 3Â·& .En + 01 2 6 epa .3 9 O . 60 e ..4-00 ba o a.r 6 12â‚¬80=i -0 0 = .E5 M M o #E LE .2 9 - 4 W - Ch A --Â· 0 14 ast Q d Z .= _ 4 -,-.01*004) 2 4 6 92 5%.Em , 32 5 3 -2- 2 = = 4. - 2 2 I - [14 4 . 6,1, - 04 '-- 04 01 V - 2 9,91220 CS C V 2 -9 3 -O A.=8-Couu tg 248@ g -9 4 -0 2 43 - <3â‚¬24} O -5 .W .C CS U E *â€¢ 4 - 01 00 .Â£ co w N ME < 0 O < 602 9â‚¬A 042 0-00 U= ...0.9 2 mv .- 1"- r-- (N co 2 2 6. 7 Wi 8 6 1 2 .s E -C - O E S= u 00= Vt -7 4 au u O >Â· * 2 Ect . 0 = : 2 2, u 85 2 3.F U 2- Z @22-3 - 4- C: .1 4 _ 0 ce Po -Â· A -2 4@2 y I .. 4.4.4 . 2 - CX & 0 A- 9 2,1 0 m m â‚¬ 2 =EE M - 0 ~~ 1.0 7 0 (N - . 13 - Â«: 0 01 vi o e 2 1 24371=41 U O r (N M U =C Oc~Â»6-1 ./ - - r.- - d 24 0 -= W 1 = Ic N 3.2 20 =A~0.2 4 0 (9 4, M d 8 -0 â‚¬,U t . fc ar ... 7 1:.1 I .12. 2 -27.21.1.- O 0 - E 5...:. 71- 1: _ 6 6 32 5 â‚¬ t 60Â·: 0 -1 tates SU~f --* -- - 4 22)Â· g n N 9 m c) 3 Bi E @ -9 2 2 -% 1@ E 'E .9 + =rp E Y 21 -< I-*-'. b j 9 6 2 e 91@4 R ott 0 < &3 0 5-3 O.= 2493- 32 i. ~--- I - E. 2 5 0 0 8 -g '0 .6 a .2 9 9 .5 0., E 8 3.9 1 -2 95 m i E S' < 0 U -C ~29.*: Â·Â·--1 E-: d -22-2: 0 U ig= w -, 1 C :. 4 1. ~ - -I 0,GE=*O , 1 4 16 U E . E U - -0 0. 4, 41 N . 0 ... - = s .= te 4 2 0 = 50 C -/ ..U'.--- 4 - O 0 -7: M t C .- : I Eb - I ... I + - m -00.02 U V-I. 05- 5 0 O Of) U -2 4 -1-2 .- -1 -0 --.. CS .0 .E u . 2 co - U .22 13 -0 33 * . s .4 C m CD LO Lf) 10 4) 4, CO LD w .N 4,1 t .C u n 00 A-4,0 - 0 --- -- CS < 6. g Z %22= 4 8 .5 -O u cs - -2 0 acioaddoo * 4 - *w 4 - E 01 . --4- .t E u 6 %* a *U n < EET- 6 - 3 ~ * 4 4 3 M 9 0 i~ 29 11 g Z .1 q t *2â‚¬ 2 78 Ero 2 = -gi @ cn .., - 0! .~. Â·â€¢ct 00 - =In '2 U 6. &0 $$ U X .u~ O -Doe u~ -Â· Bug - 0$5260006, -/ & -0 3.M Â·R .eÂ·h 00 72 - a k U U 19= 8 -22 - ,--m U = 4 -8 R + 12 -2 1 = 9 -2 -2 25 19 +- -* f = t E- A U 2.E -=.9 3 1 < E E ,% 5 2 4 1 .O M 1= 1 t .= = r 01 0-) rt io /O h 00 - C.) 6.*UN M -ECU ff, U}~:~ 5 0 91' U O 33 8:0 00000000 1 E- t.:2 -5 A U E.:6 â‚¬ 0 -6 3 d U=2& U 2 rl Â·ac 0-5 5 I C t {,1 Â·- U 2 5.0 0 50 r 1 - S 4- 0 -0 a M U 41) v M C 0 9 . U=- -4.7, UD 9 --- I 1 0 6 31 5 - , 2 - IL.22.Â·11 -2 01 4 6 r. S .= - -K...+ U h DOG -'. --;~-- ---r .1 9 0 .te Ept 0 - . g*t - C t .5 E .â‚¬ --.. ... 0 42-2 1% 9.6 N R >h es U~ 6 a -C . 2 Cl= . M 06 O- 9 . 1 ..1 U 9.1 . 4 4 O 2 . L .6 h U E + U es 4773 : C t -1 . W 7 0 0- % 0 2/ : d U >, U I. E Â·2 10 . I I '.I W - - I - c 2 34 Â£4.* w . b= 6.0 0 0 1- 00 2 E .5 0 . 0 ... 7) = .5 -6 1 ~ Â·E 3 E 4- 47.. E 2* c a * 0.2 = I 1 W 6 6 51) C. ; L..9 2 2 0 g E 4 ...0 0 0 - O . 10 eDu - -4 40 4 * r = 0 44 -'42-4,4.*. 6 RE= A N Â¤ 16 0/4 1 -0 DEâ‚¬*621:132-2 -24--- k. 4,1"644 'â€¢-rQf jr .. M E â‚¬2 49 -ls - 92 u 0 -+ i. Â·15/ - O 2 0 4- 2 -C - N. 1 Â· Â· Â£6 1,"I'24214 0 0. 23 E- 2 - 60-2 A (,5 ec t . ./. 02 u u .....Pkia'.- /4**Al' 2 3 3 E Al â€¢ z.â€¢ '5~* -'v AllIP iltco ~ 0 â‚¬< . rt- 4- I.e . - 2 . .- 40) 2 - CO ~ r- 0 2 au V. 6- 'I ..*4% , U] 6 .-D -Â¤ %0 2 4- . 2 -3 73 OU .- 0 .<..., U 23 .5.1 ., P. I. 2 e...4 2, , 162- :-Â¢39-i e. - C- Cl , .E E - h a. u- 1 -1.i. o E) Ai /O Ep - 4 - - .%1 Z --#-1 . I 06 Â·g 00'CO Â¢2 g ~0 4 * ~,eL , 0 R) % 4 /9,/flihilÂ·.- 1,~r jv /4 f - f 6 & iE o m -8 M 1 ID ?@E .E 2 17- 46 - - 2 -rr-* ~ , Fi 2,1 - 1%-......-'... Mi> O 1 6. - U P. r, 3 .S . - 4 g G C Sued - d 6. - .c .90 E ./ cS b, se , al .- - U u CS 50 -- U k C . r- 1% 1 . U - 4%1 / 0 . i 10'k = 4 .,- 0 -' 1-14 9. -- /39 4 60 4 -0 ./ 4 . -~ - 1-I //trk# -t. ....I5 -A ' C 1 Q)4' 11 9/i:Alll 4Â®KON 4 1 y,/19,- f??twÂ«H 1 -#lilip -27 4%~ f}%11!141 i.Â·i RÂ® ill 1 1, i; 9 ; UY-Â·4-4+LÂ«*ibibl i {41(~19'.imkÂ¢ 41 efs fr MÂ¥03 q uo!luolop 04 spuoixo UIS UORmS O 01[ 11!M upeq uoguolop s the volume of runoff g nd ultimately ! 1!nq u0!le.Ils!u!,UPV 0411 sopniou! pUE III posodoid 041 solellsnil! I 1, 0.1 off r Events.(cfs) watersheds g inoq 041 MOJV 0103 94 0 4 V Mosony puu uul u AAOU IllAi P io 180 u!seq uo!11101Op 041 01 sp etention Basin .3 is area southwe POKJAI 4 'SE@le Suplied 1 11EN Jo Ospo 150*1 041 louuuqo E PI!nq OOUUUMUJUM . v .' t ' !!f ti'-1, '2 11 , : .1,1 11" 1, *ISIALNGE) >RIVd SliSS[ ~- 2061, eol,HS sailll.Uerl pue SeOUejeJUOO Bu!Alas â€¢ 1,~Ij!;{fli.:..i 'Â«4%4% YMCA of the Ro ! pulAA Olu! wa s Bu!818 os!p KIsnonulluoo Uetil 10 UIOJJ POAOUI volume of 0.25 13011SUk,Op IJAIN luo puB SJO Et, 1noqu s! 08181106!p JuoK EUplp UO UBId JOlsEIN E 0100 041 Jo 1001[0 941 Puelslopun 01 S SEM Dole s!41 'u! pOSE Id Jolse~ 041 sU oveulaIP OAold, aauu!01(I uuld Â·[als"IN Bolv a.[02) 017 0103 041 Ill J <UOUni 18011 pue loolloo 01) su!seq 3.8. Area 13 Detention Basin 01 001 01!nb s! Cole S!41 :UI@IqO.Id uol[ENJO lsE) :11 Ca.IV runoff r 1 01 ON :UounloS !AA Luolloq 'f I -1 =:=1 -2 ry'lt. - = 242 - 00 N C.Â»29 A p....Irt j ~t%7'9 ,-V' 1-- i I .Dâ€¢* .....I-'",-. - .. 0 C b -lk i:* 4 -4607 4/21 ' 96,-' -1*,4 ~4 -3 '4-1,1 , Fâ€¢L- d.. lit i ,- *21 , :. 7 4,4. - , .4.~ . 4,0, 4 + - , Ir %.i*... . ..11 - 4. 4 --Â·3-2 . 41 . 4 11 LJO~jil//41 - --- -4--4 - 121 V & r - 1 Â· k .4-- I. i..=72 .., ..p e OIl K. m -- , 424 *. - 47, 2 , h; ' 1~ --6,4 h . I 34 4 i =21- ..1, -U I '' 11,~~\ i)-2 4 Vz, 4 .4 3 - 1 -# j 1 4 I - V=-A Â· -gir,iN:11 : t,~ .; - -- I .86= Tz-Â· 3- J~ :1 + f ;'....' ./,1, , . T C .. *41 1 Â· r, it_ e L-UL'* p i <-7-L râ€žEr; 12Â·Â£ m -1 .2 , Wl[-=,1-1 r, .4 ; - *A . :Ii Z . 4 CO ~/ ., 41 * - - 64'. . 4-3 0. ... 00 -Il--,d -l - Â·7. 1 1.1 . ..4 21> . %* 1 1 4 1 - V I. - 1 ' Â¥. 141 U - 0 btlk . h 'r- ~311*#11- 10**m~ V X /:{5Â·7- I 1'. . -3 r * -...-#..1 0- - V. ' 2 /r , f 1 i. ......4i X . , .h ..: 1 - *-Il - .. . 4 - i- - 1 Z - -1 ,/9/9 - * Â· 1 2 J 4\ . U 0 '8.- r ar. , U 11.1 r- - * r - 9 . I A 7 I 2 , r Â·~e,1.' ,~ Il '~ W .1 .8. ' - NE-7 4 , B .7 01-Al 41* --/ I 2 8*713// r 1 - 1. 6 1~ 4~'27 4 -/ .41+Gl, 4. Ut~.it , V /17. ..1 A '4 - - 6,2 < / 4,1 -- 0 % tr -41* C.%.4 2.74 f ~ - - Â¥> 92 6 1-2. ~~-A~*i. U~3~1 - . 11/494*Z , 1 \ 1 . VÂ¥- . 11 ~ - BE: r = ,#Â¥f -2 14% . fl~/I/*A -u -1 ' 4 /1 ./ h . . 7. .-fy : 1.V 4, . U C,!7'. 4,1 --I a - ,iii f - -a .t 429 4 . -- 6.1 - 8 - 44Â·- 0 J .2/024 1. ' u. / -4 #11 1,1. ... t..= iliifi:,i:Impeig.&7 - 4%%' - k.. 14 *k 7.41 9 'P'. i -. --- r. I - +I / 2, 5 ''...% â€¢m 5- ' 1 I. .1 8. - - m -4 1 29 J . ilt > ' : I .1 L.k t. 5 -- E 4â€ž,:p . _ ~'- . - ~ 6 2-L-/41= 4 L .1 2- 9 - 16>mt ./Ill/1/'ll/'Calli ./' & : Â· 0 73- 1. 4/ 4 -'*.. 5 . 9<1* 7# 6 47- I. 41 1 1 + I 5 C-------- I \ 52~6&40+63/, _ ,247 -< -1 3~~ -7 3 ~~~ - /-~.. 49,11 N,DiaA 714 $ At -- Â£ 44.0 t# .' Vi ll . - * f'i*:..~~~ . ...i.4 41 4.~/i~~~ AS.. 4 0 '4,4 21 2 4,- 0 . 4 4 ary 1- 1!111 . L :JI;' .11'' - , f' <-7Ft,1 X4 81 146 . h SUIPIng Suns!xI[ uIseE' 0!0010.IpKH -l0ulsed - uouumoa Posodold INO;)-IV ~ MVal 900Z An6nv u!Ses lill Z06L aouis se!'!lue=' pue SeOUal@Juoo 61,!AleS ~0~ 12) >1}IVd SalS 21 ~, I- ~ su!set[ 021?UJUICI UE[d JolsBIN EO.IV 010~~ . I 1~ 0.1nfi!:I t LOL@-99G (OÂ£6) XVJ . 99Â£6-995 (OÂ£6) ]NOHd L!909 00Â¥80100 'MyÂ¥d 53153 . 99+ X08 -0'd 00 'NUVd SEIJJSDI b SNIA]AanS ONÂ¥ 9NI333NK)N3 NHOH NVA~ ~ VOMA MEI 181*d L Lf) S . #-palve, 9 ,Lam[HS i em 01*r spodn 11]lun 900Z-60-11 18 NOISIA32 31Â¥0 133Hs R ~83, 0 \/ U. f -7-4 6 /f./ 27-k 2 __i \./0 r 90< Ir Â«4 ~<f~ \U\~\13 Â«Â«11% 41 /f i r .~7rs .4 11 1 \ O ,' th.\- \9*k-/ L <pof -w,r , t:))1 I \/ (313 f /1 1//) t 7 41 Mu 1 1 C tali Ap/, . 1;,4- \Xi I . .7, \Ii , / LL) L_,21 wL , 1 1 4 , ~..-1113. \ N.â„¢34 2 tra,Â» 0 1 ,1 ' 1?g--9 .x t ';' \. ~ / j \Nic y-- -s~ , Vv-~, 0 41 'Â· 5 1< X . 0 04- \ f 1 , 1 -1 +F \.1 -h. l 0/ 1 /~ 1 W ...4 / 1 1 -/ t. 1>-1 1 ' Ii: l t" 1 1, 41 lei 11 , ' OÂ·0 . .....1 >04 E- * -<s. -- e ~ :} - 116 -Al- / ,- , '.4 1 1 L. -41 1 8- ' 1 ' cA D S.=1= 4 Â·940 64 U \4 L - -1 1-1 k fic m 4 .\ 1, R 1/ .1 1--1 , 6 / 11 i-* '*4"1 11 / , 2 01\ dll S Â· 0 6 III .114 11 Cs ~ " , r 1 'L - , 1 '11 / . , 4 1,< 1 \ 1-1.- + I.- - 1/ IA' . 112': ~eâ€¢-% - 9%1 i V , 11 A & 1---////1Â»sij# '< L ~%1 ~ T lt#AA \ . /40 4 / 1 \1111'llÂ¥ 111< t '4 \ 99 03 - f (1 1 1 N I 1, A , ~lilt{;~ 9 1 "1} / Â¥ 11 1 - 1 ' 2 / 1 *awl'~11 111\ 11 X *6 , lili / 6 . ~<-'Â·. 4lf- .r' 4 . \\\\ -----x 1-7 (-...... ...' , 41- 1 3 C ~~Â·42~'.i.i~j;i.Ir Â·,i~ 1 -- 1 _ / C -e, r --, ./ - 4 11 6 1 'W . al \Â»1 \ 1. \. / S A. \~ \$../% 4<i k / V h 7/ D.lil 19##Â·Â· ~ 1:6:1 1 0 /# ukh \H / S' r \ / .11' 1,1 1 Â·Â· I i E f * Mi k ~ 1 // , a., 1, 7 10 1-Â· 1 / -it- /lq 1 - r :'~b-~~ T. + 1 4, ,~f LF-- - 3-dJÂ¥3 4.114rÂ·'. ' '/ \ v b 1 L. \ 1 1 i j J jj),1 / 1 1\1 \Ir Â£ k -- c,~ .-r I d~) ry/1<1* i- il 1\1 1[_tf >;*1:-9-1- 8~. / .r.,~1-1-Sil': -â‚¬" El M . eâ€¢ 4 '97-'.~*M# 7 Â·tlNTÂ»--A i , S -A 9 3,4 & 1+4 , 17!4'3 't. C..4 '.. .....1 \ ~ , :.MUÂ·:Â·i':-9,4.'.,t'IÂ·' . ~ NUU.:wÂ·..'3Â· 4 -- I , 0/ I J,Lty# ir , 4. % 74':Â·'trK.Â·: g LA L "; 6... /' ~ le ~2 4,44.1 1 21, 1 1 / 1 ~..11!11,5.- 1. 0 E' } Â·7 s ' 19 k 1\ 1 1 E 1 I , , / : 4 1 lul h .rolf//1/7 1 /O i l / b 1 4 12+ I k i , 62 /1 0 -4 4 - 1/ 4 i i illi; 5 Ax / St i ' 7'1 3 RMZ# ,..t- / 6 1 ~ . .*/ 1- 9 1 rEA -0 :02 4463.-J /. /1 , / S ~ / fi / ,Â·'6 ' Â·Â· 1 1 , ' )4 '/f' '0 ~63.f ~. % Â« / 2 1 1/ â€¢ 4-1/ / 0 ,\ \ I 0 : j . --. I 6.1 0 2 1 , i ,1 ~.. 4~ 64 .' ....4 .' 1 1 .\ , 1111/1/ 1 , 1,f '. '' . g -'. . , /1...1+ 1 - 1/ 1/ i f X a. O d. \ 1 - ,-1 1 ' I.~. *-I. I. ,; - , I Nt: \ t: k I - i\;0 , 0 . M k , Â· ' 1 4\ 3 A , ~ // 0 4.-2 \ - hhi g -'Â· / @2 -0,- <46, ) I .1, f -#L r 1 .03-4 A \< , 1 1 / 1 \ /- 1 1 .4 X. . .e 1 -4 - , u 1 , 14.4- 1 19,1,1- 1.~ 104 f 4 . - 1 D C - r 4 , .. . 4. : 10 : 1 . . 1 0 :?31),-W..\1. 1.\\ /0/ 4. 1 .. ... 0 N I. I '' ' | i in- i ~ :~ ) w w-=1 T c -- 4 7 2 j ;, ~ .. 7.:,DIC,1.-4.Â·Â·,47,4 6~if.--id '' / , , / -11.8 005 f / i 1--/ ---c 1 4i, I r 1\ - - 9 0 ... 32.4 97 4. ,/ r D / f. f 0 Â· Ii-Al,FlÂ· c \'/'l : .Â· 4,41 I / 7Â»4?44- 1 / 1,1, IJ 1 - 4 4 44370 s tr-1 L, 6-1 4 1 /1 ld' i -lltv--- 7 1- 1 '1049 t < 111, \\ Br 0 Â· 1 /to a. - Â£ / %1 L n] 1 0 . t/< / 7 [,2 . . \ / : 41 . , N.#*u ., / / 0 ; --1- I'll Â· - I tÂ·~Â· , ~ ~~5* 1 ,-~G ---2. th: 1 . 1 \ 1 1 15 7 - /1 hot 1 '555.\ / 4 41 /1 Q ..3 4 IfÂ· /f % 23 , :15:1! E S- 4 'fr.4 12% /1< C\\1~ 1 %24 1 1 11 6 *69, ' 4 i, 11'.-' T A 3.4. 1 1 .1 f f f O [0 - Ata / 0/ / / 0 . 1 i y 1, nij / \\ F Url(.1 , 1,1 , , .:. -S- 1 1, j j I , .l '1 0 - ili.1 & .4, - - - ; 00 / I 0 .,VI, 1 y Ili , / + AJF LA 11 31. 1, j - -Sk N h , ' i~ 5 ; 3,00 \ j a. \ A / '. E i~ 0 s------ ; 1, :Â° i p ' 01*6 - , // f \4 1 Vul\/ ' 1/ / . 1, 44 ;bl=_i,}- f Tal: fif , U t/Ze,; 4 . If.,U ' 1 :Ret '151 phibu . ... W - ... 4 0 9 /1 1 j 4 / Cci i It / /(N/, ---- # ~ ~ Â· ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ) 2-~1 i ~ ; # /.,0 .0/ 1.1. 1 // ..1 1 /1 I I , - ' ' 4.1 Al '0 ~\ 1 -. Uff.-7 4 144 C 1 I : C .0063 . u' / J -, . / \ 11\ , 9. ' 7 D 1 1 / r elvall : 4 5 4:IIi \ 1 1 I 1Â»--4- 1 1 4 1 ! N nt N eli, N f ' ' 1\ - , h\t ~~'!;~/ \~ j 9 ./ / 7 r '\ 1 . Itt '' \11 11\, ./ 1 \ l 1 51 . <. -- , '' \\~ \ . k P+4\1.~,~~\ 1 11 X -4 11. ---- 14 4. 0 - I VA , ' ' \ r. 0 7 1 a'' 1 /0 lit : \ '! ,\\\\ 1 1 , .I q\\ UN~ 1,4 j / E / 0-3 j \ 3 2 A \ ~ - , *d /// './. - I ./ i 10*/f / / / 'll.. 1 r/ t' ' y. 2 .f / ./ ., *'V 'r 1. ./ fl 11/ 1.r--/ . 6 ) \ \ \ 'CO. / i i/..g ~Â·,Fit"/,~ , IO-Â£0-2000 91-ZI-ZOOZ 19 03>103HO ON TONd 2164 VEHI RO NDS 0060 -9 14_*33149 S EN8000. f GYNA STORAGE Â¥H67 RIENDSHIP 1019-989 (OÂ£6) :XÂ¥=I â€¢ 99[6-995 (OLS) ]NOHd Legog 00Â¥80100 '>Ihfid S1LS3. 994 X083 '0'd 00 'NHVd Saijisal 8 DNIA3AkinS GNÂ¥ DNIH33NIDN3 NHOH NVA Ole- VOPU M m 11 .'. 111 10]fOhid â€¢ r & 0 9 I,JIfIHS Z DAAr 531Â¥Odi Unlan 90oz-60-tl 133HS o o~~ ~ AE NOISIA33 31Â¥0 m ' --- ~11-1 9 5 01. f L'<49A< 3( 49 ___Ifir#C'<156.- /' -792 l'bl'11\ 1 \ 1 1:. Cal,-- his. 1 . - 4.-. \ ' // . 't ./ / r I / / / ' 1, Â· - ....: .,# ' ...: .: 3 ... 1:'' - , - 16- . 59 Â· i ~ on .- 39493%921 -~-1-Eli-2-<~2----< _ . >.-0.~Â· ..ilr > \2\2\ 43929394212-===2910%422- .- , i 1 c-FffÂ«la-z---- A //#*At , -2 / --- 9 - 7 ~ ~ 1 lil 't --' A , . - --*---LT--f -- -5 - PI: - . < -- i - 1 7 -/ \ M \ 11 9=--37===-3------..1,5.14- 6.7 .....' X ,-:. Â· ~ 3>Â» -' ./ep? ' ...1.14Â·:C, ./25 1.1 ,.t. ..Ir -il:44 - N.2 -- ~ . \ - ; # I * '. It i / ./ V~1. ~ ~_. /4 21/1 1 .. 1,2 , B. \ Fly i 0 /. ---------2~*deBr--4,Â·Â·-in-Â·Â·Â·Â·~1533, //5011--~ 9 41//':,/.C//1 449..,I; I--It , TY&&$ I - --h - f h , 1 i I r- -= 1 . 9. J 1 -'i ~/.b- 4 1,141>/4 ,_.. A 1 2,1 I \. I * Y ' 31' - r n , ' 2 112 4 - t. 1 43,80 5-_-1~6,-*------502.---7,#'.--2-,I~ H//// -- -=--- , 4- ||| , 1 1 1 1 1-11 1 1 / 11..10 1 111 11 1 11' 1 11 1 -132311 1 I 1-t P -S .8, F ' ._jLT.s= E-22Â»11-2-JU /7= / A- 0 1 \ S h 1-- -4\. r ,-3141/27 / 4 1|-|11,1 I t,~---UL'V-' 0 -- 4.-91 41/1>- 1- -1 0 , --04 ,' , I t/ 1 9/- 0 '/ f I Â· 'A7,re Â· -1.Â»R.91 / m.// - 0 1 1 (3 e - .4 414 , / 14 111 1 / ~ 1 *41 1 ~~~ kAAA \ j Â· Â· . 1 ..w:4 - 4 / p 1/ -' /6 . 1 Ill 11 \ * 181, 1 1 -/lk . W- . . JK/'i li r--7- , T. V 'AtÂ¢ 444440.74 04\\~&51 , F fc., Â·ililÂ·' i,d, i # 1 0 F / -1 ' 1-, 44 1 .1/ r'' - 'i. 4 vil,11 1- f - ... + i *.,#-2.1 1 . 1 r /1 0 -- %,t 4% 4-~ le W d .. f :j 0 \ / / 6. \A -Â·41*k -- 1 !/-3 ---~ , 41'-r# r~~~1. 1. - I. l \ 344/ -<~- L 1.1 + 1/''ll.*2\ - 1.-144f C t i 1 - >CA.4-1 1.11 V i ~2/<\~i.00**m Vj*jr</441% 0 0 \ 4 - 6- 1 1. < Â·Aly:1 .2~ - / Mmi f FU ./>1' ' \â‚¬ 4 m 01 Â»,11 iw n 6 8 0 f --- 1Â»23/4 hu NX .lfile----- h. 1 , , / -\22.0 Â»=N- 1 1 i IO-Â£0-2002 9T-ZI- 3002 ' < .4 / /If: PIN-EHAVE 10Â£9-995 (OÂ£6) XY:1 . 89[6-999 (OLG) 3NOHd Ztgoe 00Â¥B0100 'MHÂ¥d 53153 . 9St X08 Od b ONIA)AblnS ONV 9NIH33N19N3 NHOH NVA 00 'NHVd SNJ,SfI UNE Vopu E m " / 12 103rONd â€¢ 0 Â° 0 -41&*ing.... 8 iNNHS & 3/r SllÂ¥Odn *11].LA 9002-60-11 Me W . 2 133HS 0 00 0 0 /8 NOISIA38 31Â¥0 / r \\11 131/1 \\ -1\ / Â»-AA f %Â£ i \\4/ h- 97#9?044 v ---------~*,4 Chi \Â»-2-1 -1 f & A Ma 9 1 %/ , 1 6 14.-ff],/17 i 94,01 ~414< -0*1Â«-'.70 \ / 1- 411\ / 9.1, --- ' 4-_fill ON y 4 41 1 235> h \ jl , * *r : ~Pn:i , % ~ i / 414'f 4% 7 4 \ C 4 \ \11 . * CA *611 / - --1- 41,1. \/1 i , .L , 't</\7 ' \2\ 0/ r ,/ ---3 (4 f co / t/] 90 64 r t0 < 1 , 4-0 'r / , E / / ' 4 v L.-4.1 //9 z i .53$/ I'J ''3+ ~F / ./ 11/ , - w 1-1 \41\ 4 IC / R,b \ 42\/ho 3/5/-/ //,/A\%45Â§/-Â»:- x t 1\ -\ \ 04 + -1 Â£ 31-\ U 1 \ 11 /0 r h< \ (\12,11 1, \ \ 9 *poy--0 ' -r>~--~f~ul .t ,/ 1/// CM, lÂ»t<- 0/ 2~%7*179Pty \\ , , y. 1-4 ,\\ \ L 0/ , Ii__- I 6 M / i FlL' I - 2Â§ .â‚¬0 , 4 \ A , 4 : -\ \ +0 11 1 1112 =><3\, 1 \/4 40 '' , 11 ?j,i\\~ 19 ' t5"-#,O- ~el 41"*A,3., 9- .11 f * 2:23"â‚¬h 4 3.9f 4,1 >'' ,/ / 1/ // ...J,h.1.Â«Â»3 , 1 1 lili 1 . .1 */-,- Ild 1 1 --1 .t *p._944-1 91,1 F i \Nx/7-\ il tililil'.\ ., lit 1 % ,1 -/ *22 q Ek Â£ \121 \ -RÂ« , U It \/ 1 / 1 I .//4 61 !71~72;iET\#ALe- F' . Cks -0 4-1- I ' , - -_ flild 3 / \ \ h \\ 1 / 1121Â«-+. m 6 Ir it I 1. 1 19\ 1 / It 11.14**Il #, 1- 0 0 - 1= 1 ?41111 1 111 / 1 / b4~.:~ r / . 1 1 i.:111,11:=F / ' P 1 1 a \7-4 E.i--1, 1 ' S ~ / -' 6,"? 2 K % 1// *UN f 44 4.74 U \1 1 .A ,t k i \7.f~fakrwl \11\ j a ',<q~--1 .42*9006.7 ., ~1 -7 i? * 34 f 582 11< 7 1 ----1 2 7 I .6 1 1 A / 1 . 1 1,1., -1 J '1 ' ,11,1.11 h - 1/4 -11 +91*- ~1--4-1 1- i 1.1 1 4*GE: ' - /9 k /7JI I j ) 3 4 ~ - 4 4 \, 0 -W - L -- - 11 0- rb h . r U . 11 14.>- , & L 1 1 A m/i f -Ef#-4-4Â£ 23'4 *-04-L--- 1- , u j'~-24 \ t.1 / %3 ~ 0611'lf// 1/,5~41.3,112? /T -42. --- - < i * ~\.1 2 1 fE, 4 Lftn- W- 1 *.1 # 1 - * fil < ---- Â» 11Â«(~ ~ '' ' 1.0% 1\1 LA--A \ 1 \\\ 11. 8 A > * \J , t 'Eff /8 a r \ 1 1. \ co I \ / /./ \ \ 41--Â» j - I , 1 , 3 1 /31 ~ f. / 11 kt.:> .6.,ih\ . 1 - -X&- -$=. 0 to 21 , =- -1 0 / 6 1 1 ~ ,Â©, ilf i/ -'icÂ¢&124 21 . 7 3 - .41 .0 f /* , - \ -r, L 0\ v Vi Y 71Â·10- f 1 2! i.bl: 1 L .1 I j W i'94re=.D 9 7-. 4 - ~,1 4 I Adm lÂ¢.,~0-*[4~BU & f---40' 4 -- .41.1.' r --- I Â· I tf . -Iq-- , \ -Cl_ d. , / f i ad# l.. 11-4 7 1.4/ 6<12.14 \\\\ ':Ad 0 0 4:7 14Â·7~/ f 9 rh.3 , ' 9- //.,/ UR# ill : h /5/6 - 23 -1 -f-31 / /'' 15 1 .; ~ 2,24[ r Il 12 / -/ / , .1 / ../.. * .Z . L--4 111 1, t - 11( 2 7/, / 6/ E \ - -- ..9 -la - ..%-- \0 - \ ~ ~~ 1 / 14 ? 4 : 4\ I m . 4 : --_---__--~--v, < 43 9 J d 15.21 1411?341Â»t 1 ..2.21 1 1 / 1 1 Y : :1 -' 1,9'*.. + 4.%'. , b - I - - 1121=J ... . . / , Jl I './ ' , r \1. 4 - 1 . / -* m \ 1 0/ , Ill , I - 1 f i /4 9 -/ I '1 0 0. 4 0 ---- ''' ''/, 1 ./.4 Z - 4 , ---- i - 2 1; 0 1 41 091 --1 \49 - 0 1, ) 2,1-OHE ' 4- , E-Ki \ - - - OHE-gR. -h- - , 'f / ' r-~ 3 H -41 -- - - L , -- r J ' 0 ' 0 " Wl â€¢ â€¢6 ' , 7, m 1 1 C. 1 9 j . 0 , ~ ..r, r r. â‚¬ 'Q U , I -- - ./ I '4 2 , - I- 02'S _ , r 0 - -3 -- 0 i 1 1 , , r--. . '1 2 0// I - / 7 1 6-1 , o E N Â£- / I 4, , - - Â»Ls 1 1 / 1 < 0 ' 4 i.,- i ..i Â»~ H/1-1-1 - - 1 /' /*K : ; r 1 x '- * 41 - ---T #Fi _>X - , 1. I \ . I 4 - 3.1 r , - Â· m Z ,/' , ' C:;4-ZI 411-0900 0 -- - ---4' ----p<+T --- - rn, I 6- kE 1,1 r . 1/ \9 ,-- 1 -- 111-- 1 0 ~d, \4,0 / 1 ; it .%-1#1 '-Â°~~ t~ ilt d# 4 .- -1- 1 p -1 x -* \ \ tf G /0 1 1 - 0 2 / 9 4 + i NX 1----S -2 4 - d. .4 '' I , '-2 63 - too 2322-zz:Z-X 1- 111 . , \ Aj , ,\, ; -hÂ·/ ' I. /-~- . I -- -, / f ' - 6% 0 -1 1 \:%6\4 - -4.\0\ 111 1 - - \00 0/ -4 425114 --- / ,/ , 9.44 -4 .1 4\40\ 1 9 . - \./ -/ , , - p h. , - 1\_ , / /14, 4 V 0-iÂ° f | 79 - / i / 0 / , - 1 1 / â€ž e. /f LI@ f:'' /8 225Â« \\ h \ \ 4 -- I {Dhi 1 - 3 O , -- - 9>44)7 ; 11411Â·0 1 1 Â£ Pvt 'l f rkE/--\-.-OUA J / C' i L I b. 1 , CO -f ./--f-, tei~ ~,P #7rliE 1, Sjil ~ 'fr -r- 1Â©JIIX| , - h kA- - - O,4 : . .% 04 - 4 ' k I h.1 0 -rf\ . ,\. - 3 4, E ee ZT,Â·Â· ~ u , 1~lf //i . CR><ly,Im:1\ I -- %2%861 , 1 / :' I Â¢ *l \ /\\ t .*-1 1,ji 1-.1/ 42.-21111\1- , 0 Ar M i Y, 1 m#F Y\PR @j . '\ I: / 4 + 4 v,k o /1 4 \ . --4 N . \22 - i i, 01/ 41 11 144 - 94 /,1 M / 70'P , j , 1 10 1 1 ''\ 1 9 11 2* j / : '/Cm/i' ' 1 li' 4 'N- 1/ p ~~.~ - T ~1 ~ ~ k--*-x- ,~-,~#--59 ~391,dv 4 *40Â«11 1 1 ' k b -I_ x' I 1- T\ \\ CL \ --2%47 / , 3% 1 2 ' 0\\302" .4 x . \\ .\ 0 / / * N ....//3-0- O *il h + 4 3 .1/ A /4 \\ 1 *-\..%\ 1 '-9 - - VVE., i F , .' / i i i / 1 1 )~426 0 - 0 L . - --- W. 0\ 1 Ill/ Av# l , m# -i . 'LA 11.1 - " 0 \ 1-- G - Â·liE ,// I W 9 -- W==2- \0 ' i _ ,- I k '11 1 7 _ . - r'~,6 ~1.~~ /%17,r" ' /471 L~ 6 1 jr , - 4~'~ (76 2 dki ,).i.~1& ~ -> ~ 291.7419,4-\--31<1 . 4 / / 3 1: 4 - A % 1 1 libe if~i-ilemp../ , 34 T , -- 41 - 1 7 a-51-9 - M U/%,/45-rei~ , , ; 1, 1 .1 'J' A-- .- 1 \ . 1 .1 - X.-- --4-\\ 14/ -- f Jr , \ / I 1// 7 1,2 1 4 4 \. - 61 1, s &, - -- 1.112 2 / 0 UX''f / / , rj & 114 24% .--- *-Fr-11, %12\2\11\ , .... 31- -- -/-v-0---1--- ---1 .1 &-- <- * 0 V , w ' 11' mt / . I h h. ' 6*4__...4 iii 1#tr , / /,7 /2 / r, ' . 1 h . 9 . , ':'. , 6 4- k 01 -' / --4, All../- . -- -- -- 0 --0/ 'Al .1. : //' ./ 1 //'/.9 , . 4,â€¢Â·, 12--n,ii'L -11&1 :2--- ----- .I--- bil- . 1,1 fe Tr.- 4- - 1 - .11 . lu 1 3 - 4 l'Itt \j re .1/ /\ . , ' .... gk' r< / 1 -- rl-* Ii\>113, / /{Iff ./, El /2Â«-f-Â«fi (1 + : t, , / 7 1 1 , /// /111,\11 .v 3 4 -112 1 9,i\V 1044'04. // t////'/' ./,//0/f ---431-2-r)<48Ir-VAN\I\A '/) 1 /)1 6.:I- /\ f-74 <1 I , 1 'sh/iff<:<51'rfiffzf.illry)+MANIÂ»3~h~NÂ»i.:f-1-- Â· . 1 / 1 11'' IO-50-2002 9T-ZI-2 02 18 03>103 0 ILLOME , ' Â£3111 -~ 3437 ~ETORIA~ 6- -*0 3 POOL -Â«14-ALPELV 071I103 1174 INE#-: . -% 006.2 GALOW VIEW MBERLINE 1018-989 (0Â£6) :XÂ¥3 . 99Â£6-989 (046) :3NOHd Â£1908 00Â¥80100 'MyÂ¥d 53153 * 951 X08 '0-d SNIA3AkinS ONÂ¥ 9NIH33N19N3 NHOH NVA 00 '>INVd SS[JES[ g - '*P VOFU EEu 10~d L CD ~ 0Mr 511Â¥0dn killt.LA 9002-60-11 - -M" 861 --w 6 HEEHS 133Hs R M ~ ~ 18 NOISIA3hj 31Â¥0 -2/fÂ« c C ~ 1- 4-5 ~ U.-/ 1 i 1 / /fr tr 60- 0114/ i // ~ -- - <2,/04-02 .- t 1 11 N.- I j %%.M '. I /. -f -.W ./.f ' ' - I /lA 1.-- // 71/ff 3 - -Jfc --f f.j R~ --0 --13,2-/ , 4 . 9.3=...Pi,ki , , , it 1 J - 1., -- 41t, i--'t-Â·- 1 1 #--Â£-# Â«_~rJJÂ·---05 / -, h \ /'1\{(/ - d ---~519,4 49.4 \ t.Â·42>.Â·35Â·r~ / . i , -K-- h. . / 9Â«~f.,)42&*67. flt/. 1- t / I v 'v , ' /:<46A < 1 5 -239. -6 i .~~%~Â»to/. i 1 - / . - 'Ch - r-LA .. .1 3 246Â» ..~ .. , /t \ r#fie 19 1Â«.% 2-(sPUR / ... I - 0 -,--/- // a-. .*- - . 1 To!81Â£ N+ 1 14 1 K 41Â» I %- K h 1- ' 1 \4 . 0 \ 78.J :,\ ..' \ \1 4 ,%. , ,--- r- . I. ~.- / \ \ \ %'.~ ~ .~ ~1 ./\. \ 2 N \ '401Â»22 \ \ I - 103 'j i -4 4 - *f-~ c J I. *-- -- - \ / -SCE.-~ /~fÂ·Â»~2-- )<N : ) f -7 \\2--- - /1 Â£ i \0. j \ \ - , I A~ '- , U,% \1 i I \\ 2 4 L- \ I -- 1 1 j ; , I f./1,\ - -- \09 CA 2/\. % X - : N I : r.l-\ /. .1 \ 4 / '' 00 h \ 1 l 'ic 1 1 Id 1 0 Ill/*--- * --Â·Â· ' ill'' ~ k ~(.~~~Â·'~'~ 1 4/'hs, H ' - N I /:'MI.' X :0 \ / h .i.. . . \ ..ver \: . 1 06 Â» 4.9 tffÂ·Â·.2.7 - .,4 V N*C#4~'~'4~9 9' ..~ ~..~ 1.- .\ 1 -/ n.. t...3 r ----i~. - \\ ./ \.4 1 ./..\IN ./. I.,%:-:ill :h 1 5 .TY+J49*~14 \ \1. 4 \:\ ..' . im -- , 1 . \ - I. Al/' 9 4 - 4 41 1 3% h x \\ \ \ 6,1 \\\ / i\\:17Â« i iT to - . , 1% \. 4\~h.. \1 I 1 ./ E / r- ~21 025 ,% I. ./. N. * I fieiv-2# i h (VÂ·/I ..rkiti- -b: -\-- - 1 ..\ I. - 1- I.I.---2*& - \* 1 I - I -,3 u-i>4-<Â·. - LT*Â· 1:Â·C - \ 4 \1\ /.. U , \ C.. '1 4 L\\ k \ .- , Il'A, Â·â€ž ''Na= 1 1 1.1 .... 9, \ ic \42-\43--% .L / 3 . 1 - K. 6. .<i)X-- 1- 3 h\\1 - \ + - . @ 4 / 1 L, f I X 1 1. '\\ 1 N NI )1' 1 1 -1 7 1\ h N .4.\\ ~'\ , ,------\. Ng >4411 %4 O'**% 9 \\\\ Ar,- 4. 63 & i , C. L 3.r . , 1, 4.9 \ i - i ff>9. 1 1. 4 VI . 2 1,2. ~'. 9,~1, '' ~ ', 1, '1$, ' 1 1 48 7 9. ..1. , J. \4 S 1 142 i ,Â«/ 4/ \1 \1.'t , \ . 6 | 4. S.E.L*jt-w-b--1 Lum 1 ./4*14%1 0 41 0-1 \\I & 1 ' It ' co .* \2\ I . 1 3tk.*l- 1 i R 4 4 ./ <-:-74\/ 2% /1.111 4 '.Â».1,19.4 : r.~ /9/.. . . 1 - / / 4/ 4/, / \ ~2**PR-4 j el // ~ H XI SSA0H0N07 i / i'' il - '-'Wah-271 4 eN, 3 3-N\.1 0.1 It. 2 .11 j 11'.R - ..4 1,- 4- \24 r i 1 1 Â· ~ 5.> 2 I ''t' 1 & 1Â»/ 33<4 A X r A V--7.4 1 -4 - Â·.. u, 1.0 6 ' \1- /-K /.- 1 \\ 7 r L / X \ f... '.~. r _ \7\ \If ./ ... -/ f < 6/ 2 -\-3 9Â«Â·::46 -4 C '<L,#f~/--jo~f (- ~ 1 ..2:419*:,1/ ''rt 9.2 *% -AX \\ --- 26-/ /1 j. 14 v /45 1-< f 3< f. w ' f N\. 'A \\ i .1.1 - 4* 2 - F /9,/ f lit i f--,4 1 \ 1 , '2411 Â»:\ a 1 \Inr 1 .*~9 2574 '9 1 ' 2- 1 Ck ,â€¢ 46 t.Â§~ ~ 2- S \94 /-h . 4.11 1*1% 1 :arL-& f * , ~ r | iA \ r / r , p 10 < -1 1../.-4 \,4 5. ./~ 4 __354'T 9. a~\ 6 1 7 1 7-A no , 3 4 * -- 4*-Â· - <~Â· . # ~~.Â·0 E-\Â· f A Â·~ 9 / .//. L/IEZzl~-4- Rz:<csfoy / r - i 1Â·1. D... IO-60-2002 :19 03>103HO ON mad ~Â»~fFF fÂ° ~ 24/91 laof= 5, Swal S ZIETA NVW .2 13*ALS t019-99g (OLS):XÂ¥3 . 08Â£6-985 (OL~ ]NOHd LI908 00%0100 '>IMÂ¥d 53153 4 99* X08 -0'd * SNIA)AWnS ONV 9Nlhl33NIDN3 NHOH NVA MET 00 'HZ[Vd SNISSI . , I e./# U....1ul VOMA 103~d â€¢ t -'. lili 4 - rl.1 pli g II 11:it}IS 1 3 28 0,/ 531Â¥0dn AU,Un 9002-60-1 I 133HS o u, & 0 0 lei NOISION 31Va ' ' S>~9<74''Â· -4 / / // â‚¬53-7Â»5'Â«3 \~ V , i X Â»K "' %\ c\\ \\ 1<~ ,~~ t f Vi=--Cl~3 ~cij~Â»,\NX\\~ \\ 1~\~4 \ \\ C / 1,\ \\\\ '. ,\ \\%\ ,\\\\ \\ N J\1\ \\\\ ./ \ lip j [7 - Â· 30/ Lgo 4 \ 11\ \\\\\ VI) \\\. ~ 1]14\\ ..~#tf-fif~~ Â© 2 * \ & INME,1 Â·, %Â·Â· h 49/,kiltil; 14\2 <-:.1, Â£ 1 ..S<\~,Â·Â·944 . 3 196< A Oh . \ M 2~ 1 1\..1 .L>..91.\ / \9 \\\\ . . \\4~ . I 9- U 1. --I ./ I ~4~40>Â»24 .111 J h / '- \ . 2*A 1 + 4 4/ : 2-&\ : 4 \6\ \06: 44 \ ' lfÂ«/j\\ \\\\\ , / - i. r,--14,--- \ \ ' C b ./.\\ 1 \\14- LE-' f'.. --- El ./ au \ ./ 2-21 1 c. #.* 2-< * 63*t. 1 3 / Â«779Â»1~0-- 1 2 \94Â«0Â« i 0 \\\\ \ 1/ 1 f ..,9) -4-3 0- --------- - ---71 ., -3-~:--~~ ~ :<-1--:Â· t_tÂ«fj--r L< fA 2-~~~ ~ ~ 1 , 4/\\ ./ -S-- . , 4 4 / A Â«-3/7 4.0.-, 0.\01%\ ,Â«--M-17 3 ' .1<14 / . t. 4.3,plk VE; . 161 Â«6. 1,- C h , . r \\\ A -1 - I t. 0 .-- 0 13/1219 / 13%33Â·>~3$<>j, : = h)) . .r ." 8- '. u~GEâ‚¬~7 39/ ~ 90; , ''\ L ' '74 _-1 U 1 1 \ I & 0Â· P U N \ 19 4 \ \ -h\.1 --.\\41 1 / 1 - L.-1 11.-2.-1_2:= <13// . .1 .. / 6 <f.h ./ ' 91 1 )1 1/1 j /) / f f j l, B-LWL_ 1- 9-0 \ 1- \ \ 8 - ,/\ I. '' 1 1,1 I \ \ '' hal, : /ZE- N. I - . . \\ \1 \ / -* - --\ \ 'L \ \,~ 1 pa :I,\'t F<.~~#- X I i4'' -'': -Ill j B ' 5/' Ar , \ 1 -- .-- 4- / - , %0 11: 11.0\1\\ I \ I . 1/ gl i.Ing ~ . ..1. , 1\\... 4 1.--- \,.\ 11' c 'Â·Â·.9<4 \2\ ...5..s-0-:~ o\.. I.\ 4/ .. u \ : / 1 *62- Â·,0 --44-- t.- 1- h. -3 -- 1. u 77-*ri]HO. MO Â· - I I . 3#0 ~~ 4.. 3 1 rr_6 . Â·151 7. r % ---A - ~ 2 4 2 - . ' A\\ 'cr Â·. \r -- \X ....1 1 , I. 07 d3%:\%...,43 ~ 1 ~i~ ../ .IL- - 1 69% l \ I. ~--\ \ ----6 -\\*- 6 - --2 ov 1.-22zn~ 1.-Â·-Â·Â·~~4:n>Zf=zo,.2 x. '4__~ . c K .! i , .... / - 1 1 2 4 2 11-7 - 4 /0 - \ \ k. % 1 OHE-OH[I .-11 2 \ \ r JE .....~- 0.L. . h -0 h I , r. r / 0 , . 1 *2 J ' 1 r 1 1 2 .- , .----#-----4 1 ./ .X : .---*------ -/-- , b F / D ./ f 7/ // . ... ./ . k %'. .-------1 ------...: /'...'I ''-/---'..'A//%.I V ,.-/? . 1. D /-- I - / M & / 8 h -6- - EN-- --- 1 j -70 H ti -04 L ./ ..20 ' I / r- 2~ ~'* , J , - 0 - I --- --------- 9,Â·/jof Yy // i $.. -/ S / 2 / /7 11 I. ./. I. 1 -3 VAÂ· -_ "3 -Â·9* -830- -- k. U / - -, - 0 2\.A-- )\ %- 3. . ~2 -- EUL-9~-7--1 - /41 ./ : Â£-/ - ..2 9 -e; - 7 --~ Pe-RlA -Â· - 1 1 ..9941-2- , 1.6 S *.JI - ..0% PEARSON - PIPEL, \ 0 - ./// %.'.../ A 0&-1 --tn . k . . ~"C~ A /~if/~ - .ic 22/-_ Â· 08 0 - . 7-7 H=EFL' 9- #; %.~- /Ue7Â°463Â»61Â«Â«~~- --....4k.-*kf-k*-M ---- ~~~ ' *~-'-~4-/-1--.7 0->L\IZE-/,t?//1.-/ / ~f / \72 b f/ â‚¬3 0 XI 0 r / / - - < -Opospir--____6-----2.- -- r - 1 , /4 1,2.Lo - 11 / - . - .-il I / -- *- ---* %,k- -%- I .- r-=-% %... 0/ / / / S % 'Y %. / r. / / I. -4Fte---3- 0 3- - i \ / - ~~~zni--~->~,42 - i qi I --- f ir f , J i.<-On--- 0~- -- .~n-px*x-M--- -3~>ff-7%frF?effÂ°7_93Â»-2-2<%5*bt* %~~---3-3----5.jÂ«-~~2\)~0-2232_LE.I__cr ID-00 -2002 9I-3 I-0002 :Aa a3>103,10 1 'TREAT N < WEET 3 fupt\% 1.- TYNDA -ON -TOMd -- 1-, , ~1 ill///////2/~1 \ 111 /J fl/fE ~ lole-999 (OL6) :XY:1 . 98Â£6-989 (OL6) aNOHd Â£ WOg 00Â¥90100 '>18Â¥d 53153 â€¢ 9 Gt )(09 '0'd b SNIA3AHAS ONÂ¥ 9Nlh133NIDN3 NXIOH NVA~ 00 'NUVd SDIJ~Si[ ~ 0 ' 1 VOMA 1 ' .. lilli . 00 11 133rOWd â€¢ C\2 t.0 1 u 11 4 0 11 1 11 1 Al,1,17-* - < \1111~'. 1 1 1%,4 t' 0,2 v -/Mt & ZI .LS[G[HS 1 w e OMP Salvadn AlrILLA 9002-60-al 10 NOISMEN 31Vo \,7, 133HS ~ : 07 / / -/ /320\41/Â«1/03.59Â»097 - )35 r~2223535ft~11,4~ f i LAf#640&%Â·Â»1,f~f.~~4 Vki /, f / 1 1 l . 1 . \ I // 7 j 1 1 , 'r / l\/./ 3,266<fecti, 165,3/,iit .% 4,ri.rrcv;-~ / i 2Â·:4 ~. 1 i .&.. 2 i It i I ---%-*IÂ·Glf.Â£--**% ,; Â«/..4/644*/ / ff / ' . 1, 1/1 11 . ' ///1. . , / L ' 1 , ' Â· 'll / I fj/ Â£\ 1 i f 1 ---- : 1 C 1-4-- - -3-41 xi- r-C . i\/ , 0 4/ - 59174 \ t-- U 1 1 M I --- 2 .) ;CLI. f . / 0 , / \ 7 1 4 ------I / j j , 4 / 1 2 4- 4 1/ \ 41 \ 1 Â£, { -//Â»-4--1--~/ 1 /1 ~;,f</ ff ~ -i' 1 i '*.\) . 1 MI h \ , / 1 4 3 Oe ..1 1.3\ N \\L r ~. \ 1\ \ 1 / [4 40 1 -1 I. j to / -4 h .1 i.. , DeÂ·-1 \It / 1 1 Â£9 r. 1 -14\ \ 6 '1.\\ 11 /.j, i / \\ 1\ l\, 3% \ 10\ - 2/ \Â· Itt ':'' - 0 %\ : i r 4.-, A\' '\\ \11 - h e ...1 1.# 1 --' \ \ / \ \ 1 14*118 cl< 2 :- \ 1 1 . \ 1 11-1 1-// \\ 1 --4.-- --- ' /11/fll - \N, \ 7 1 1 / , ir-7 ...\ R\.1 ./ I I 1.- h \ --- \ 1- ---- \-- %- - \ . 4Â» 6, 11 / 11 I $ i 2-4\U , \ a I. . .. ..%. ------ .. ---I)..: .- \Â·-m .f e I .- ~hÂ»:. 1 S .K- I. \ N -- L 9 .1 -1---I- 1. :\ A 1 04 X / -,1 .. \-\2\ ..S -- ... Nt . .-. b 41.- --2--- \ il- . Co \\ Â£ - . k -----------1 \\ ---- --~-h\-1 4 -1= .. ) i\ $ h -\ r.. - --i-<1</% /322 - ----1\ - DON \43 -2----CL >Â«. Â»Â« MPX-jj 11 42--% r. . N - ... 1--- , .1\.- - -\\b. \ ..... . -'. N IX- *0__4-' I A \ \ . h .1 , b-- ---- ./ ----2---, <06- - f 411>- %)X /-- j ./- 1 .. 4 \ % S 0- 3 -- 1- - r - .... * ---9------ -i-- 1 0-33\ \ *..0 ...M \%- ...--46~44 ' 6. ' ~ ~ ~ i. . - 4- 7,341 4Â« 1 2 5 -- * :. 10 h. -/W ./ Sal--5 1.%Â» 412 , 1 , I - --1- =J Â£ 1 \ \4521 4242- , i :i <tc<.CWQ~-<itics \-4Â«Â«, 24Â«29 ( C I - 'f \ \C) 41 /0~Â£-Â·LAE-4-#*Â·Â·LoHE/-71:'- 4%lei-TÂ£22%-- , 2 ' t 8 ' 1 / 277-7 2 i f 7 -- 11% .93 1,-i Â·Â·.Â· ../.. 1.,11-Â«>- 1 , I 1 1 i \ 1 f if/--- 1-1/2.0 1--f~: #\ \ C --0- /4 / L ------ --% 1 . .0, %/ 1/\ --13*6(1/..0 3 Â·~1 . l'/ i O\4 \\ 1/ 1 5 / r' 1 09 4 5 11 1 -1 0,/,/ -- % 4 0 . 1 CO~- 1 \P Â· . W / f, 6 ,24 , . ? 3 3 4 \ ./ ....abi 4 .... 4 , m /r. rÂ¥hÂ·6: \/ L fl 4 03 i 0\ 3 i N ' I \ M i 1 1 .k \ '" , 4- 1 M I \.IN 4 6 7 \' 1 l. 0 - I / Â¥ 1 44%-L.W. h .4, 1 1 2.Mn \,4-- '-1 ,\ 2 1 \ \\/\ 4 \ > 1\ 1 \ \1 \\ 1 1.5 A / 14\ J 1 \/1 911 1 11 . , 0 A' % 1 1 1\ \ \141 /1 /\ 1 /35 -Â·- 4-Lt \\4 . 1/ F f . i ; ...9 Wi w /; 12% \ \% \ \ 31\1 ' 7.-2-4 1 )3Â»3 4 460<,+90 l I 'm i \\\% 1 ,S, 11 \1 1 (: i ., ; 1 r 13\\1\ 1/ 4-\3 r .b \ 1, , Â»Y)~ % 4, f / 10 42 , ,-\ \ 1 1 \ \ .\ ; \:99 C -h -I....0-----.ill-- --------- 0 . I .,. 1 1 1 1 - d 'Â· ' V -1. /2,9 1 , \ -2 5' 0 \ -2<6.,4.j 'i .\ 1 \. \\/1 \\ 1 ./. 1/ I. j /'. $' ' L. \ 11 1 i . I ''. 1 )6 i / f, :. i 4 04- 1 . 1 1 X.-I .. 1 ..1 1 ffi\-'-'.ff-14Â«f i &,1 1 - 1 + It - N \2/i. 65 Â£ . iN 9 1/11 l ' \ .ilf/\i/ ./444 \ \ \ I J 1 d Ltrl \'I.. , ilic/ /. \1\\ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \. ' ' ! '5 ,/ fr \\\ 1 , , , ..\\ L -1\\. . il\\ , i\\ 1\\\~ I k \ \\ 1 '\ 1 \ \' 1% 4 \ \1 -- 31 i 1 1. lh/ , ( / /6 ... \/Al .1/1\ . 4:./ \\ /X\4/./ COLO\\\ 61.1 ,/ 1. C \ 1 \ 1\\ \04\\ \ \ \ 1 \ 1 1 > 1 1 \5% 79\\%' :' 14./.\ 33/2.1. ~ I\. \ ,} 1 1 I \ \\ \ i \ \\ Jiti' 1 \ / 1 4. / lid \ \ \ 1 ~ Â·. 1 . 1 NUE-,42' l\\ \\\1\ c f / A \1 1Â« lif O ./ m 1,1 \\\\\< 1 , / ' / N - 1 1 . 1 I RL I 1 - 0 4 \ 1\ i / \AO X *Â·4 ,-'-\ \\' 'Â«\ 1 /Â· 0 i 1 1/ U 1 -1 ' 3 \ cj \E \ \...:\ .1\ 1 1 / 1Â»- P:) 3(/L-,% -3~/Jt<.2.0.1 1 1/4 \.. \ -- t -1 A L' 1 4 \ \ \ \ IO-Â£0-2002 19 03>10]Ho ON TONd 133HS -Â· -= 3{10Â¥3 -- -9yjIU-1,1 \ 11 U ~37960.8 Xwl.