HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Town Board Special Meeting 2015-04-15Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 15, 2015
Minutes of a Special meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes
Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Event Center, 1125
Rooftop Way in said Town of Estes Park on the 15th day of April 2015.
Present:
Also Present:
William C. Pinkham, Mayor
Wendy Koenig, Mayor Pro Tem
Trustees John Ericson
Bob Holcomb
Ward Nelson
Ron Norris
John Phipps
Frank Lancaster, Town Administrator
Greg White, Town Attorney
Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk
Absent: None
Mayor Pinkham called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and all desiring to do so,
recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
1. ACTION ITEMS:
1. CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY ACT (NEPA) PROCESS FOR THE DOWNTOWN LOOP PROJECT.
Administrator Lancaster outlined the purpose of the meeting was to take public
comment on the Loop project to determine whether or not to proceed with the
NEPA process for the two remaining alternatives; one-way couplet or no action,
or to terminate the contract for the grant and reimburse Central Federal Lands
for the cost incurred to date and discontinue the project.
The Town received grant funding through the Federal Lands Access Program
(FLAP) after an extensive public outreach process was conducted and a grant
application was submitted in the spring of 2013 for a one-way couplet with $13
million awarded by FLAP and an additional $4.2 million in matching CDOT
RAMP program funding. No Town funds would be used to complete the
project. A number of alternative were considered including five options that
were ranked: Construction of a transit hub/parking structure downtown;
construction of a one-way loop traffic pattern downtown; construction of a two-
way four -lane Riverside route through downtown; construction of a multi -use
trail along the Big Thompson River connecting the River Walk to Rocky
Mountain National Park; and, "no action." The first choice of the public was the
transit hub/parking structure. Second was the one-way couplet option. Third
was the two-way, four -lane Riverside Drive option. Third was the multi -use trail.
Last was "no action." Based on the criteria for the grant, it was determined that
a transit/hub parking structure project, alone, would not be competitive for the
grant, therefore the grant application was submitted for the one-way couplet.
As Federal funds are involved, the project is subject to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires an analysis of the project to
see if other alternative may have fewer environmental, social and cultural
impacts while providing the same benefits outlined in the scope of the project.
NEPA requires extensive public input and technical analysis. The NEPA
process has been ongoing since fall of 2014, with various alternatives being
examined including several proposed by the participating public. Based on
analysis to date, the NEPA team has reduced the viable options to the one-way
loop, as contained in the original application, and the "no action" alternative. On
March 9, 2015 the Town received a letter from Central Federal Lands (CFL) on
Board of Trustees — April 15, 2015 — Page 2
behalf of the FLAP program Colorado Programming Committee notifying the
Town that only the original scope of work (the one-way couplet) would be
considered for funding and asking for the Town to indicate its intent to continue
with the project as originally contained in the application, by April 16, 2015.
Since that time, CFL has clarified that the NEPA process won't be complete
until later this summer and therefore they are requesting the Town indicate its
intent to continue with the NEPA process, analyzing the only viable
construction option remaining - the one-way couplet, and the "no action"
alternative. Should the Town decide to not proceed, it must terminate the
contract and reimburse CFL for all study expenditures to date, tentatively
estimated by CFL to be roughly $200,000 - $300,000.
Director Muhonen provided an overview of the current traffic situation and
problem, who is responsible to fix the issue, why the loop project is the
preferred alternative, affects of choosing no action alternative and
unanticipated benefits. The traffic congestion downtown continues to increase
each year which negatively impacts the guest experience, compromises the
sense of safety, and increases frustration, noise and air pollution. Traffic was
identified in both the 2011 and 2014 citizen surveys as a top concern. The
Town has taken the lead in addressing the issue through the identification of
grant funding and a collaborative effort involving all parties, including federal,
state and local government. The Transportation Visioning Committee reviewed
transportation concerns and developed a report in 2012 outlining solutions that
involved both low-cost and expensive implementation solutions which included
reviewing traffic patterns. Through the NEPA process the one-way couplet was
identified as the alternative that would best balance congestion relief, provide
minimal property impacts, minimal environmental impacts and could be
constructed with the available funds. Beyond congestion relief the alternative
would provide shortened emergency response times, improve safety for
pedestrians, create new bicycle lanes for future connectivity, and establish a
foundational Riverside Drive corridor for future parking and congestion
mitigation projects. No action would maintain the current travel patterns and
lead to an increase in the number of gridlock months from approximately 4 to 6
months during the year by 2040. Staff has begun working on the parking issue
with a new intercept parking garage to be built in 2016 and the Transportation
Advisory Board to produce parking policy objectives for the Town Board's
consideration in 2015. Staff has also been working with CDOT to produce
RMNP guide signage and downtown wayfinding signage to direct park visitors
to the north entrance and reduce congestion downtown. The barnes dance
would be reinstated for a period of time this summer to study the effects on
traffic movement. Staff noted the City of Loveland and Town of Lyons have
one-way couplets that do not negatively impact the character or viability of the
business community. The Town would gain the replacement of three new
bridges through the completion of the one-way couplet project which would
positively impact flood mitigation.
Floodplain Manager Birchfield reviewed the floodplain concerns that followed
the 2013 flood. He stated the floodplain may grow considerably in the future as
it has been determined the town's flows may be under stated. The
replacement of three bridges in the downtown core with the loop project would
help to reduce the flow rates in town and perhaps make significant
improvements to the flood plain, thereby decreasing flood insurance rates in
the downtown core.
Kimberly Campbell/Transportation Advisory Board member stated the Board
held a special meeting on March 30, 2015 to provide a recommendation to the
Town Board on whether or not to proceed with the NEPA study. The Board
recommended support to complete the NEPA study and continue to review the
one-way couplet.
Adam Shake/Estes Valley Partners for Commerce Board member stated he
was not advocating for either position but encouraged the sharing of
Board of Trustees — April 15, 2015 — Page 3
information to help inform the citizens. The Board wants to work with the
business and citizens to address the issues regardless of the outcome.
Those speaking against moving forward with the NEPA study included Jeff
Carpenter/county citizen, Holly Moore/town citizen and business owner, Scott
Davis/town citizen, Gordon Slack/town citizen, Leslie Peterson, Elaine
Sparks/town citizen and business owner; John Meissner/town citizen, Tom
Street/county citizen, Ron Wilcocks/county citizen and business owner, Mary
Simon/town citizen, Todd and Karen Jirsa/town citizen and business owner,
Krisi Nielsen, Ed Grueff/county citizen and business owner, Ellen
Reinertsen/town citizen and business owner, John and Wini Spahnle, Mark
Newman/town citizen, Lynn Ciolli/town citizen, Mark Igel/town citizen and
business owner, Carissa Streib/county citizen, Craig Conley/county citizen,
Rick Grigsby/Town citizen, Durango Steele, Jerri Paulson/town citizen and
business owner, Alice Schwartz/county citizen, Norma Blackwell/town citizen,
Donny Yeager, Norman Lee/county citizen, Lee Lasson/town citizen, Stanley
Atkison/town citizen, Jeremy Plume/business owner, Doug Warner, Jennifer
Lusch/county citizen, Susan Wolf/county citizen, Mark Hewitt/county citizen,
Maureen Marsh/town citizen and business owner, and Lawrence
Replogle/county citizen. Comments were heard and summarized: altering the
traffic patterns downtown would negatively affect the businesses that collect
sales tax for the Town; the Town should focus their efforts on producing more
parking downtown; traffic congestion during the summer months could be
addressed through proper signage, reestablishing the barnes dance and
proper transportation alternatives; data used by CDOT is flawed and cannot
accurately predict future traffic conditions; the traffic improvements would not
be significant compared to the impact on businesses downtown; the loop would
allow visitors to speed through downtown and the Town should find ways to
keep visitors downtown; the Town should use the approximately $4 million from
the devolution of Business 34 to fix the West Moraine and Water Wheel
bridges; a Downtown Development Authority could be established to help the
downtown businesses make decisions for their future; the Board should do no
harm and should consider the quality of life of its citizens living along Riverside;
the Town should establish a plan before implementing a significant change;
Alternative 1 would negatively impact the environment; and direct visitors to
use the north entrance of the park to help address congestion.
Those speaking for continuing the NEPA study included Dick Spielman/town
citizen, Brian Berg/town citizen, Diane Muno/town citizen and business owner,
Bill Almond/town citizen and Visit Estes Park Board President, Elizabeth
Fogarty/county citizen and Visit Estes Park CEO, Charley Dickey/town citizen
and business owner, Amy Hamrick/town citizen and business owner, Kirby
Hazelton/town citizen, Paul Fishman/town citizen, Lindsay Lamson/county
citizen and business owner, Teresa Maria Widawski/property and business
owner ,and Kent and Judi Smith/town citizens and business owner. Comments
were heard and summarized: the congestion downtown in the middle of the
summer should be mitigated and the Town should take advantage of the grant
funds to address the issue; choosing to move forward with Alternative 1 would
allow three bridges to be fixed and mitigate flooding in the future; the Town
Board has gone through a substantial process and it should continue to gather
further information and complete the NEPA process; the congestion affects the
visitor experience; the loop project would positively affect the community,
improve safety and economic viability of the community; the project would be
the first improvement that future projects would build from and would not fix all
the traffic issues; the CVB commissioned a study in 2010-2011 and found
guest were least satisfied in the summer for several reasons with one being the
traffic congestion; congestion downtown causes guest to spend less money;
the FLAP project is the beginning and not an ending to addressing the
congestion issues; and thanked the Board for the vision to seek out resources
to address the issue of congestion and failing infrastructure.
Board of Trustees — April 15, 2015 — Page 4
Board comments followed the public hearing with the Board acknowledging
their appreciation of the public comment received: Trustee Ericson stated the
Town has reviewed all aspects of the issues including parking, shuttles, roads,
floodplain, signage and technology which are all inter -related. The Town
commissioned a traffic study in 2003 that led to the shuttle system that has
improved each year. The Transportation Visioning Committee reviewed the
issues and developed a report outlining solutions such as traffic patterns.
Trustee Nelson commented the Board and staff have done significant outreach
to gain public input. The Town does not have all the information to know if the
one-way couplet would be a viable option until the NEPA study has been
completed.
Trustee Phipps reminded the public he voted "no" at the March 2013 meeting
to apply for the grant as there was no master plan for the downtown including
Riverside, possible condemnation and the lack of involvement by the National
Park. He stated some improvements are necessary and bridge work is needed;
flood insurance continues to be a concern; the Town has a grant to complete a
downtown master plan; vehicle traffic in the park may be restricted in the future
and increase the use of the shuttle system; and outlying parking areas would
capture vehicle traffic before it enters downtown to ease the traffic. All of these
items need to be considered as well as the economic impact of moving forward
with the loop. He has not been convinced the one-way couplet would solve the
congestion problem and a master plan should be developed first.
Mayor Pro Tem Koenig concurred with Trustee Phipps. The environmental
impact study once completed would likely not allow the one-way couplet to be
constructed due to a significant impact on the environment. A master plan
needs to be completed for the area and the issue needs to be looked at further
before moving forward.
Trustee Holcomb stated the comments received throughout the process have
been equally for and against the project. He stated the objective continues to
be what is best for the community moving forward. The evaluation process
should consider all entities involved, the need for access to the park to sustain
the town, and the continued degradation of the Town's market share by other
mountain communities are all significant issues to consider. The one-way
couplet would only be one piece of the solution in addressing the congestion
issue and the Town would continue to address master planning, parking,
pedestrian movement, flood insurance rates, and other pressing issues.
Stopping the process now would lead to many unanswered questions and
concerns. The Town needs the economic and social concerns answered in
order to make an informed decision.
Trustee Norris commented the large complex project requires additional
information the NEPA study can provide before a decision can be made. The
Town needs to understand the economic, safety, and environment costs to
make an objective decision that would come from the completion of the NEPA
study. The Board does not do the project justice without the completion of the
NEPA process.
It was moved and seconded (Ericson/Holcomb) to continue forward with
the NEPA process for further review of Alternative 1 - one-way couplet
and the "no action" Alternative, and it passed with Mayor Pro Tem Koenig
and Trustee Phipps voting "No".
Whereupon Mayor Pinkham adjourned the rp etirti11:33
illiam C. Pinkham, Mayor
10_z
e Williamson, Town Clerk