Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES Town Board 2012-02-14Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, February 14, 2012 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 14th day of February, 2012. Meeting called to order by Mayor Pinkham. Present: Also Present: Absent: William C. Pinkham, Mayor Chuck Levine, Mayor Pro Tem Trustees Eric Blackhurst Mark Elrod John Ericson Wendy Koenig Jerry Miller Greg White, Town Attorney Lowell Richardson, Assistant Town Administrator Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Mayor Pinkham called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and all desiring to do so, recited the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT. A group of Estes Park High School students presented a petition signed by students in support of the Elkhorn Project. Elizabeth Fogarty/County citizen and Winterfest organizer thanked the Town Board for their participation and attendance during this year's event. She also thanked town staff and other local Associations for their support. The event continues to grow each year and even filled Barn W this year. She and others would support a new event center at the fairgrounds and encouraged the Board to maximize the size of such a building. Johanna Darden/Town citizen stated she attended the neighborhood meeting for the Elkhorn Project where neighbors voiced concern with privacy, noise and property values. There were also concerns with what would be done to the property, employee housing bringing an unwanted lifestyle to town, cars parking in the neighborhood, and noise violations that would not be addressed by the Town. She stated the overall sentiment of the neighbors would be for the Town not to fund the project. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS / LIAISON REPORTS. Trustee Blackhurst thanked the snowplow crews for the snow removal efforts this year. The Housing Authority continues to move forward to divide the Pine Condominiums into two subdivisions, affordable housing and senior housing on separate lots, to help with financing the market rate units. He reminded the nonprofits in town to apply for the grants offered by Ride the Rockies in the amount of $5,000 and encouraged the nonprofits to be involved in the event. Trustee Ericson commented on the next Municipal Election taking place on Tuesday, April 3, 2012 to elect three Trustees and the Mayor seat. He stated the election would be an all -mail ballot election, last day to register March 5th, petitions for candidacy are due March 2nd and ballots would be mailed on March 12`h. Mayor Pro Tem Levine thanked Kellsie Purdy for representing Estes Park during her reign as Ms. Rodeo Colorado and for being an ambassador of the community. Trustee Koenig informed the public the Sister Cities committee would not meet this month. She too thanked Kellsie Purdy. Board of Trustees — February 14, 2012 — Page 2 Trustee Miller stated the Local Marketing District would now be known as Visit Estes Park moving forward. The LMD Board received updates from RMNP focused on Ride the Rockies and the Ecoblitz sponsored by National Geographic, strategic branding, and approval of strategic marketing plan for 2012/2013 at their recent meeting. The Shuttle Committee would meet to discuss the timing and the routes for the year after taking a ride to see how proposed new routes may work and what issues may arise. A final recommendation would come forward to the March 13th Town Board meeting. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. Interim Administrator Richardson provided an update on the RTA application stating the Office of Economic Development sent a letter to the county for comment. The applicants would provide a presentation to the State to address any concerns raised on March 8th at 2:20 p.m. in Denver with Mayor Pinkham, Frank Theis and Todd Jirsa to present. Other items include a presentation on the CAMP scheduled for February 28th would be moved and a new date would be announced and lights down Elkhorn Avenue would remain until the end of the week to allow photography by the LMD. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Town Board Minutes dated January 24, 2012 and Town Board Study Session Minutes dated January 24, 2012. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development/Community Services Committee, January 26, 2012. B. Public Safety, Utilities and Public Works, February 9, 2012. 1. Reassignment of contract with The Engineering Company (TEC) to Farnsworth Engineering. 2. Bond Park Phase V Design Consultant, Chroma Design - $43,873, Budgeted. 4. Estes Park Tree Board Minutes dated November 18, 2011 & December 16, 2011. Johanna Darden/Town citizen requested the Community Development/Community Services Committee minutes be removed from the Consent Agenda and added as an Action Item. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Koenig) to approve the Consent Agenda items I, 2, 3.B.1, 3B.2 and 4, and it passed unanimously. Consent Agenda Item 3.A. Community Development/Community Services Committee minutes January 26, 2012 — Johanna Darden/Town citizen requested the Board open discussion on her definition of open space. Trustee Blackhurst stated point of order. The only item up for discussion were the committee minutes and not an item discussed at the committee meeting. It was moved and seconded (Blackhurst/Miller) to approve the Consent Agenda item 3.A, and it passed unanimously. 2. LIQUOR ITEMS: 1. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP — FROM REBECCA, INC. DBA FAMOUS EASTSIDE FOOD STORE TO SERINA LLC DBA FAMOUS EASTSIDE FOOD STORE, 381 S. SAINT VRAIN AVENUE. Town Clerk Williamson presented Board of Trustees — February 14, 2012 — Page 3 the application stating all required paperwork and fees had been submitted and a temporary license was issued. The owner was present and confirmed the manager Alicia Escobar has completed T.I.P.S. training and he too would be completing the training. Mayor Pro Tem Levine encouraged anyone selling alcohol complete the training because the Town takes the selling of alcohol to minors very seriously. It was moved and seconded (Blackhurst/Miller) to approve the Transfer Application filed by Serina LLC, dba Famous Eastside Food Store for a 3.2% Off -Premise liquor license at 381 S. St. Vrain Avenue, and it passed unanimously. 3. ACTION ITEMS: 1. ROOFTOP RODEO CLASSIFICATION AS A MEDIUM SIZE RODEO. Manager Winslow outlined justification for reclassifying the Rooftop Rodeo as a medium sized rodeo. The Pro Rodeo Cowboys Association (PRCA) categorizes rodeos by purse size for which the athlete competes (Small = $0 - $2,999; Medium = $3,000 - $9,999; and Large = $10,000+). To determine the correct category size for a rodeo, the total amount of committee -added money is divided by the number of PRCA-sanctioned events. In 2011, the Rooftop Rodeo had seven sanctioned events and provided $23,600 in committee - added money (averaging $3,371 per event). This moved the Rooftop Rodeo into the medium -size rodeo category. An additional PRCA policy states that in order for a rodeo to be sanctioned, it must budget at least 17% of the previous year's ticket sales toward the current year's purse. For example, 17% of the 2010 ticket sales of $137,000 ($23,290) must be budgeted as the purse for 2011. Since the 2011 purse budget was $23,600, the Rooftop Rodeo satisfied this PRCA policy. Advantages of remaining a medium -size rodeo include greater purse money would attract additional and higher -quality competitors; communities ability to market in larger markets such as two new national sponsors (Wrangler Clothing and Pendleton Spirits); and greater public relations opportunities such as requests to present to the Association of Rodeo Committees and competitors of the Rooftop Rodeo to compete in Colorado vs. the World. In order for the rodeo to return to small -size category it would require a decrease in revenues through a reduction in the number of shows, limiting the number of shows or capping attendance. Manager Winslow stated it would be mathematically impossible to qualify as a large rodeo unless there was an increase in seating, admission price or the number of shows. One consideration of moving to a medium -size rodeo would be an increase in the annually -negotiated contract if a large increase in contestants occurs, with an estimate of an additional $5,000 in stock fees. The 2012 approved budget includes funding for an increase in purse money and stock fees. Ticket revenues are expected to increase by $10,000, and, sponsorship revenue has increased $3,000 with an additional $3,000 anticipated. Staff recommends that the Rooftop Rodeo remain a PRCA-designated medium -size rodeo for 2012. Comments were heard from the Board and are summarized: Mayor Pro Tem Levine stated the move from small to medium-sized rodeo was a direct effect of a decision made by the Town Board to increase the grandstand seating. Trustee Elrod stated the numbers covered the 2011 reason for moving to a medium -size rodeo and stated that future decisions should be well informed decisions; and Trustee Blackhurst questioned what would happen if increased revenue projections are not met in 2012. After further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Koenig/Miller) to approve the Rooftop Rodeo move from a small to medium -size rodeo as designated by PRCA, and it passed unanimously. 2. ROOFTOP RODEO COMMITTEE REORGANIZATION. Board of Trustees — February 14, 2012 — Page 4 Interim Town Administrator commented members of the executive board of the Rooftop Rodeo committee met with staff and Town Board members individually to discuss reorganization of the volunteer group. This would be a continuation of staffs efforts to establish clear relationships with other Town volunteer organizations, Friends of the Museum and Senior Center Inc., through new MOUs. Staff has reviewed the proposal that would bring greater continuity of operations between the two organizations, increased efficiencies for operation of the Rodeo event, increased administrative efficiencies and greater accountability of financial activities. Howell Wright/President and Mark Purdy/Treasurer of the newly formed Estes Park Western Heritage, Inc. (EPWH) a 501(c)(3), replacing the non-profit Top Hands organization, were present to review the proposed reorganization of the Rodeo committee, a special committee as outlined in the Municipal Code. The 1940's Town formed Rodeo Committee proposes a new operating structure for the organization and redefining the relationship with the Town. EPWH request the committee no longer operate as a special committee appointed by the Town Board. The Friends of the Rooftop Rodeo volunteer organization would continue to coordinate the volunteers and fundraise for the rodeo. The rodeo would continue to belong to the Town, be managed by Town staff, and determine personnel and funding required to produce the rodeo. The new organization would expand fundraising opportunities; contribute to the rodeo's future growth through an added capital campaign arm; and through a Board of Directors to control administrative issues, thereby limiting the Town's involvement in daily operations. Trustee Blackhurst voiced concern with the Town taking action on an item that has not been vetted thoroughly by the entire committee. He requested additional time be given to review the changes by both the Town and the committee, and the MOU have an end date to review the relationship in the future. ITA Richardson stated the MOU would be reviewed annually as other volunteer MOUs. He also suggested this model be considered for other Town volunteer organizations, especially the liaison position. After further discussion, It was moved and seconded (Koenig/Miller) to approve the reorganization of the Rooftop Committee to operate as a separate non-profit entity discontinuing the committee as a special committee and eliminating the requirement for appointment of the committee members by the Town Board, and it passed with Trustee Blackhurst abstaining. 3. ORDINANCE #01-12 PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCES BY TITLE ONLY AND ELIMINATING THE REQUIREMENT THAT PAYMENTS OF BILLS AND STATEMENTS CONCERNING CONTRACTS AND REBATES BE PUBLISHED. Town Clerk Williamson presented two ballot questions for consideration during the upcoming April 3rd Municipal Election: Question #1: "Shall the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, be authorized to publish ordinances by title only rather than publishing each ordinance in full in accordance with Section 31-16-105 C.R.S.?" Question #2: "Shall the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, not publish proceedings relating to payment of bills and statements concerning all contracts awarded and rebates allowed in accordance with Section 31-20- 202 (1.5) C.R.S.?" YES NO YES NO As a statutory town, the Town of Estes Park is required to publish the full text of ordinances adopted by the Town Board including exhibits per C.R.S. §31- 16-105 and a summary of the bills per C.R.S. §31-20-202. The state statute allows a municipality to eliminate the publishing requirements for ordinances at Board ofTrustees — February 14,2D12—Page 5 a regular or special election by publishing ordinances by Udu only rather than bypublishing the ordinance infull. The same iatrue for the publication cfbills. If approved, the Clerk's Offioo will publish ordinances by title and the onVna text would be available on the Town'swabniUa immediately following approval. Bills would continue to be available on the wmboita in full detail rather than the summary published in the paper. Astatement concerning contracts awarded and rebates allowed with a value greater than $30.000 per annumwould be placed on the website. The purpose in proposing an ordinance at this time is to address the costs associated with pub|iooUnna, and provide additional government functions on|inu, thereby delivering information to the citizens efficiently and effectively through o-government. Attorney White naod the Ordinance into the record. It was moved and seconded (B|ackhurnt/Levine) tnapprove Ordinance #O142'and itpassed unanimously. 4. RESOLUTION # 03'12 RE -APPROPRIATION OF 2011 ENCUMBERED FUNDS TO 2012 BUDGET. Finance Officer McFarland stated some Town departments entered into contracts in2011 for goods and/or services that were not fulfilled by the end of2O11; therofone, the funds would be nu||ed over to 2012. There are 31 items totaling $544.905 that include funds for the NEPA study, infrastructure improvements and vehicle replacements. Several projects slated for 2011 were not startad, thernfnro, the funds would return to the {;onony| Fund including $310.000 in ST|Pfunding. Staff may come forward in 2012 to request additional funds for additional ST|Pfunding. Mayor Pro Tern Levine expressed concern with 3T|Pfundo not being spent in 2011. After additional disounuion, it was moved and seconded (Eh000n/8|aokhumt) to approve Resolution #03'13 to re -appropriate funds from 2011 to 2012 budget asoutlined above, and itpassed unanimously. 5. RESOLUTION # 04-12 GASB STATEMENT NO. 54 FUND BALANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Finance Officer McFarland stated the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions requiring new categories and new terminology as itrelates tofund balances. It applies only to "Governmental Funds" including the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds (Community Reinvestment, Conservation Trust, Open Space and Community Somi000). |tdoes not apply hothe Internal Revenue Funds or Enterprise Funds. The current "restricted" and "non -restricted" any replaced with "non -spendable", ''newthobed^. "committed", ^aooigned" and "unassigned". The new fund balance assignments would appear in the 2011 [AFR. The proposed Roou|uUun assigns u designee to make the o|aaoiDoadono as required by Statement 54. It was moved and seconded (Ericson/Miller) to approve Resolution #O4-12,and itpassed unanimously. O. CHANGE ORDER FOR STEAMER DRIVE OVERLAY CONSULTING SERVICES WITH THE ENGINEERING COMPANY. Director Zumstated staff has negotiated a scope and fee with The Engineering Company (Farnsworth Engineering) for design, specifications and construction management services for the Steamer Drive Overlay project atacost of$23.337. This project would baadded tothe approve Virginia rehabilitation project. The additional scope of work would make the project more attractive to bidders. The PUP Committee recommended approval of the change order to the Town Board for consideration. The total combined foe for both projects without contingency would be $00.904. it was moved and seconded (B|aokhurnt/Kounig) to approve a change mnJmr to the design engineering and construction management services for the Virginia Drive Rehabilitation Project with The Engineering Company (Farnsworth Engineering) to include Steamer Drive Overlay design engineering and construction management utmcost mf$23,33Twith o1D%contingency, and itpassed unanimously. Board ofTrustees — February 14.2012—Page 6 Whereupon Mayor Pinkhamadjourned the nf»ahng-tlY*30 C. Pinkham, Mayor oWilliamson, Town Clerk