The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board Study Session 2010-12-14;31 LE- * Revised December 9, 2010 <OWN-BE, STUDY SESSION TOWN BOARD Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:00 p.m. Rooms 202/203 170 MacGregor Ave. AGENDA 4:00 p.m. Draft Report of Cost of Services Analysis for Water and Electric. 5:30 p.m. Dinner Break. * 5:45 p.m. Town Board Meeting Procedures. 6:00 p.m. Bond Park Drainage & Future Agenda Items. 7:00 p.nn. Board Meeting. NOTE The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Jackie Williamson From: Admin iR3045 Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:02 AM To: Jackie Williamson Subject: Job Done Notice(Send) ***************************** *** Job Done Notice(Send) *** ***************************** JOB NO. 3757 ST. TIME 12/09 09:56 PGS. 1 SEND DOCUMENT NAME TX/RX INCOMPLETE ----- TRANSACTION OK 6672527 Greg White 5869561 KEPL 5869532 Trail Gazette 5861691 Channel 8 6353677 Reporter Herald 2247899 Coloradoan 6922611 EP News ERROR ----- 1 * Revised \.El_E.L>' STUDY SESSION TOWN BOARD Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:00 p.m. Rooms 202/203 170 MacGregor Ave. AGENDA 4:00 p.m. Draft Report of Cost of Services Analysis for Water and Electric. 5:30 p.m. Dinner Break. 5:45 p.m. Town Board Meeting Procedures. 6:15 p.m. Bond Park Drainage & Future Agenda Items. 7:00 p.m. Board Meeting. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 1,/ 1.1 4 **94/ t - , f 0, ye, 41 < < Jackie Williamson From: Admin iR3045 Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:42 PM To: Jackie Williamson Subject: Job Done Notice(Send) ***************************** *** Job Done Notice(Send) *** ***************************** JOB NO. 3747 ST. TIME 12/08 15:36 PGS. 1 SEND DOCUMENT NAME TX/RX INCOMPLETE ----- TRANSACTION OK 6672527 Greg White 5869561 KEPL 5869532 Trail Gazette 5861691 Channel 8 6353677 Reporter Herald 2247899 Coloradoan 6922611 EP News ERROR ----- 1 â€¢ it le 1 'Fil TOWN or ESTES IARIÂ© Memo TO: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt From: Lowell Richardson, Interim Utilities Director Date: 12/2/2010 RE: HDR Rate Study for Water and Light and Power Background: Utility staff members have been working with Cil Pierce Project Manager and Financial Analyst from HDR, Inc. over the past months for the purpose of developing a cost of service analysis report of the Town's two utility departments. Ms. Pierce will present the cost of service analysis draft report for both water and light and power which includes recommended rate changes. The study was approved and commissioned by the Town Board at the August 24% 2010 board meeting. Attached with this memo is HDR's PowerPoint presentation and draft example of the rate changes for water and light and power. Budget: N/A Staff Recommendation: N/A Sample Motion: N/A TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO ESTES 1&~IL PARK Electric Rate Summary current & proposed 12.10 COLORADO Energy Ott-Peak Average' Average Year Customer Rate Class Customer Conusmption Purchase Energy Demand Monthly monthly Charge Charge Power Rider Charge Charge Bill increase over $/Month $/kWh $/kWh $/kWh $/kW $ previous year 70 2010 RESIDENTIAL $4.70 $0.09289 $0.00507 $63.48 RESIDENTIAL, OPTION 1 2011 $6.00 $0.10117 TBD $66.70 5.1% 2012 $6.35 $0.10210 TBD $67.61 1.4% 2013 $6.70 $0.10305 TBD $68.53 1.4% RESIDENTIAL, OPTION 2 2011 Minimum consumption charge = $10/month $6.00 $0.09884 TBD $65.30 2.9% 2012 Minimum consumption charge = $10/month $6.35 $0.09979 TBD $66.22 1.4% 2013 Minimum consumption charge = $10/month $6.70 $0.10075 TBD $67.15 1.4% 2010 RESIDENTIAL DEMAND $5.87 $0.05090 $0.00507 9.83 $167.20 RESIDENTIAL DEMAND (proposed) 2011 Available to existing customers on this rate, September $7.00 $0.05867 TBD $10.33 $176.29 5.4% through April. All other times is residential rate. 2012 Same $7.35 $0.05943 TBD $10.48 $177.20 0.5% 2013 Same $7.70 $0.06021 TBD $10.62 $179.80 1.5% 2010 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY TIME-OF-DAY $5.87 $0.11395 $0.00507 $0.04717 $128.74 i RESIDENTIAL ENERGY TIME-OF-DAY (proposed) 2011 Available to all residential customers using energy storage $7.00 $0.11620 TBD $0.05806 $135.35 5.1% electric space heat 2012 Same $7.35 $0.11758 TBD $0.05875 $137.23 1.4% 2013 Same $7.70 $0.11900 TBD $0.05946 $139.15 1.4% 2010 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY BASIC TIME-OF-DAY $5.87 $0.11146 $0.00507 $0.08825 $155.52 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY BASIC TIME-OF- winter winter winter winter winter DAY (proposed) 2011 Available to all residential customers $7.00 $0.11653 TBD $0.09332 $156.65 0.7% 2012 Same $7.35 $0.11814 TBD $0.09461 $159.07 1.5% 2013 Same $7.70 $0.11946 TBD $0.09567 $161.12 1.3% 2010 SMALL COMMERCIAL $8.52 $0.08574 $0.00507 $111.68 SMALL COMMERCIAL (OPTION 1) Available to all commercial customers with $8.52 $0.09740 TBD 2011 demands of 35 kW or less $119.17 6.7% 2012 Same $9.50 $0.09801 TBD $120.84 1.4% 2013 Same $9.85 $0.09919 TBD $122.53 1.4% SMALL COMMERCIAL (OPTION 2) Available to all commercial customers with demands of 35 kW or less, minimum monthly $8.52 $0.09624 TBD 2011 enery consumption charge = $10 $117.85 5.5% 2012 Same $9.50 $0.09686 TBD $119.53 1.4% 2013 Same $9.85 $0.09804 TBD $121.22 1.4% SMALL COMMERCIAL ENGERY TIME OF DAY $9.69 $0.11549 $0.00507 $0.04779 2010 $137.05 SMALL COMMERCIAL ETOD (proposed) Available to all commerical customers using energy storage electric heat with demands of $9.69 $0.12056 TBD $0.05286 2011 35 kW or less $137.05 0.0% 2012 Same $10.50 $0.12205 TBD $0.05351 $139.43 1.7% 2013 Same $10.85 0.12356 TBD $0.05417 $141.37 1.4% Energy Ott-Peak Average' Average Year Customer Rate Class Customer Conusmption Purchase Energy Demand Monthly monthly Charge Charge Power Rider Charge Charge Bill increase over $/Month $/kWh $/kWh $/kWh $/kW $ previous year 5% I 2010 LARGE COMMERCIAL $11.75 $0.03928 $0.00507 $10.83 $1,796.33 ' LARGE COMMERICAL (proposed) Available to all commercial customers with $11.75 $0.04435 TBD 2011 demands exceeding 35 kW 10.83 $1,796.33 0.0% 2012 Same $13.00 $0.04493 TBD 10.98 $1,821.46 1.4% 2013 Same $13.35 $0.04555 TBD 11.14 $1,847.32 1.4% 2010 LARGE COMMERICIAL TIME OF DAY $14.09 $0.04178 $0.00507 $0.03451 $12.61 $536.45 LARGE COMMERCIAL TOD (proposed) Available to all commercial customers with $15.00 $0.05971 TBD $0.03237 $13.03 $558.31 2011 demands exceeding 35 kW 4.1% 2012 Same $15.35 $0.06050 TBD $0.03280 $13.21 $566.01 1.4% 2013 Same $15.70 $0.06142 TBD $0.03330 $13.40 $574.51 1.5% 2010 OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING $10.19 $10.19 OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING (proposed) 2011 Available for lighting outdoor private areas $10.48 $10.48 2.8% 2012 Same $10.62 $10.62 1.3% 2013 Same $10.77 $10.77 1.4% 1 2010 RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE $0.013 $7.8000 RENEWABLE ENERGY CHARGE (proposech Voluntary participation available to all classes $0.0210 $12.6000 2011 TBD 61.5% 2012 Same $0.0220 TBD $13.2000 4.8% 2013 Same $0.0225 TBD $13.5000 2.3% . 32 32 32 000 00 Oct oR (0 <D <0 = 0 0 0 0 C e m e 1 a d d 06 0 e N 5 32 32 32 32 0000 00 00 00 00 dded C N e N C) O 10 9 04 9 e * m CD co Joy-0000000 b Â£,ne0e ES oR@cd <cid co co <0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a>.- _AACDOLOCOUD O - -O J ~0 R UD Lr) 03 N LD LO CD 1 0 cinro> Scvc44co~p4~q OC ~~~52 rCOLD Le im 4333 â‚¬4 69â‚¬0969 w 4- C 0,) O.) 1~ A cr) C) r 0-ACNIMWWN -CO 00 - co 44"26<4 E rini 2 9 03 1 9 5 84 agn:# 2~ Ze 3 ID LO C) LO Weee N 0 M O 22.323232~3232,2 N 0 - 0-0000000 TE 32 ,2 32 22 p < O 00 00 00 co CO co 00 .â„¢0000 Â® ro u â„¢ co d d d d d d 9 0 0 0 0 d M E Â°9020900 C 4.Â« y a a) iii - A Â»0 910 0010 10 LO lr) CO v. LO LO CD bNN--Â°ocrjuiN E-2 - 00 cod!, ONâ„¢ 91' f'O CN h co h C M W N 4- W U â„¢ ,/o f/*B e" r 03 10 8 + M LO (9 â‚¬4666466 b ~Mee c .0 (99(00(004- E O 8 0 9 9 9 h 3 3} 5} 2 CDC â‚¬00(ON OO - -O -O 32 b Sts#231 2 g R U) & 2 g; G 0~69 CO ": 6 0 2"ti 0 2 0@232Â£Â£ Â£Â£ 3 + E 0,-00:Le N 00 < J = O 0 (\10 O 0 al< 0 2 0 9 - 0 > -MNN -0 LO LO 00 tO Â§ E T 69660W 0000 16 2 2 g LO W ORT ... N i -0 & Â·Â·-O b dÂ¤*80800 CZ Cac!(C!'19 &2 4 S gi G Co Ir) 91Â· C') 1Â·~ , - 4) U) 2 lo 4, 43 U) 26 0 -1 - CDOLOO 0 ..10 cO 66(666â‚¬e U.1 1- 28442%*ER < ObERER#Em Murf 0 00 =r h Ul M % 44 09 66 e' 09 60 65 Â» N Q 03 - 0 CE 111 -CO O 10 U.1 0)00 Â»NOON LU M o N co (\1 CN < 00 41 64(49>64 r r O 0 6 +ZI U.1 W Z UJ 91 8 6 'E 9 12 ~-56= = 6: : : L D a EM % CD * O= g.ala~ 0 380 t- * itfiaps-'CV MY 1- J =ME& OÂ»g 03 18 9:< m - 0.0 O> ~.GEE - ~Nb i-LL /W/* E q 001 CE a: 0 0- eBue40 % 1NablkInO %089 %08 ZIÂ·OZ JaAO Z luou wo,1 ueqin le.In ueqin Â£1Â·OZ 6ue43 % 2011 2013 oposed Water Rate Schedule {p STES PAR ated 12/10/10 OLORAD JeleM M'ng Gallons Used divided by 1,000) x Volume Charge] = %91.-8 ATE YOUR MONTHLY WATER BILL: e formula below using the charts for Base Fee and ~ LE 29-6 L 09 06 Lit 69'L9 ELLE$ ZE.98 WN OF ESTES PARK CURRENT RATES Most residential meters are 3/4" 06'ZL e N 2532 gEN ro h 2 Ir ia 41, 61 2 5 32 ge 4 2 E M R COO -2 -2 ae 0 1 01 66:8 â‚¬*M C> 03 D-- - ... W 6 06 15 r O 0 4, â€¢- co r-. C Z Â¥ r m N M co lo . c 10 00 64 0 69 69 69 09 0 8 tri 9 32 a M r g W A r-: CON 12 (4 co r- te te te & p .0 le@ J % 10 N g 4 4 10 r %2 N Xi- %4 10 10 0 0 0 a M (10 03 cd dod LO rr; A CNN M U) Z 0 -1 J 0 -3 0 0 0 32 32 32 te t.8 69 Ul N 4 d R W CD EM 4 J t0 + 09 0 2 0 U.1 KNO NOCED E < 2 8 CD Â© Lf) 040)10 ' a : ociocitociNad S 0 (4 01 fÂ¥) Cr) rt J 2 O CV 4,9 eg We e9 99 99 Zi b W m (D OONO Lr) C N UJ Z O 03 ED 0) 00 U-) 03 0 ~ O K K d A 5 9-2 0 9 N r r -NN<DOD ee 6 te e â‚¬6 69 1 0 N N 0 Z . Z UJ O : a O= 5 "INA# r J - 1- r J 0-0 O * O> EF 08.9$ %00.0 51..$ %00 0 08.9$ %00'0 92..$ %*2'0 ~ ~ LL 91'17$ 92.9$ ZZ't'$ JewAA MIng Â£ 1.02 ZI.OZ 1. LOZ ..9$ 9:.1 %6Â£ 99Â£; 5628'~ P 92 99 889$ 29-Â£$ Fm@LULUOj EL'6$ %59., 809$ %EL.* 0â‚¬-6$ %89.17 ,8.9$ % LE.9 gg.9$ t'* 89 82-9$ Mol 3 pedlund .90 63.93% $15 .70 63.93% $217.50 348 .00 37.93% $245.45 69.16% $259.50 20 69.16% $362.55 $580.10 39.71% Inches: Urban R r Urban Rural 2010 Urban Rural 2011 Urban Rural 2012 $32.55 6.7 34.80 6. 39.00 .40 43.34% $5 $89.45 43.34% 115.90 29.59% 42.15 45 73.64% $7 117.10 73.64% $1 185.50 58.41% CURRENT RATES 2011 2012 2013 ieinki K einkl Otoz luoJJ ueqjn El uegin SSÂ¥10 31Â¥51 6 9 0/ . avg.% avg.% METER SIZE incr. over incr. over $19.05 $30.50 6.40% $ $32.55 6.77% $21.7 24.80 $39.70 $48.95 23.3 3/4" * $19.05 $30.50 A31 t U104 86 ello % 86ue40 Â°0 9$ %.0-9 96 â‚¬$ $ LL-Â£$ le!luapisah' BASE FEE BY METER SIZE Most residential meters are 12/10/2010 th. 9; -,49*.it .th '. 0 4,:Y I L . 1./.. 1 . 1- .25â€¢b }, J t> 4/- & ESTES PARK 4 e >$,299*11 COLORADO ...A#kimit ~.419 - - D- - 0. - . 1. Presented by Cll Pierce and Kevin Lorentzen, HDR Engineering, Inc. m. December 14, 2010 I.A'-.A,0.''ll'-'-2."/IMk Â· Overview of a comprehensive rate study Â· Review the results of the Water and Light and Power utilities: ~ - * ~ 4 Revenue requirement 4 Cost of service 4 Rate Options and Recommendations ~~~ Â· Summary of Water system development charges (SDCs) Â· Next Steps 2 , 2 1 12/10/2010 - . 1. . 8 . 0 0- I I . 9//M'd!1!1-14'IMII'lli'll!!11111'1.li' '1 1111.h 1,1111.9/Fl=r..6~ , i.'cd ' Compares the revenues of the utility to its expenses to determine the overall level of rate adjustment Equitably allocates the revenue requirements between the various customer classes of service Design rates for each class of service to meet the revenue needs of the utility, along with any other rate design goals and objectives 41.rip . :Ill , 1 31 + 0&M Expenses + Taxes/Transfer Payments - + Debt Service (P&1) + Capital Proiects Funded from Rates = Total Revenue Requirements (i + Term) - Miscellaneous Revenues = Balance Required from Rates 9 Annual /4 +aka 4 1 Deprec. Exp.) + Total Capital Projects - - Revenue Bonds (Bond proceeds) - Grants Customer Contributions (e.q. SDC's) 24* 5Â·4 0 = Capital Projects Funded from Rates -r-- 4 2 4 2 ~~ 12/10/2010 â€¢ Debt service coverage (DSC) ratios ~ "Minimum" reserve levels â€¢ Financing of capital projects - -9 levels and methods 4 Proper use of growth related revenues â€¢ Adequate Funding of Renewal and Replacement Capital Projects (Existing Facilities) 5 ' 1 ~r ~i,in<UY,~0,Â·iwiÂ·in Â· 0 - Â·Develops cost-based rates using "generally accepted" methodologies e t Â· Provides the basis for "fair and 1 I % G 0.896.4 equitable" rates t. 2 Â· Develops rates that reflect the reason for costs being incurred 4... Â· Provides the information to allow 0 -1 . the Board to make sound and 4 1.1 1 ..f rational decisions 1/ 6 3 12/10/2010 'Mm"I'l. y.â€¢' 'ik Â· Revenue Requirements:~ 1 Timing and level of rate adjustments for each utility Â· Cost of Service: git--2 > Implement cost of service results or apply adjustments equally across the board 19*L Â· Rate Design: 1 Direction on rate design for each utility 3% 4 Meter charges adJusted for water 4 Customer charge increased for L&P System Development Charges: j~> Level of change and timing of implementation 1/4 y / / 7/ 2111 0. 0 1: Â· Focus on adequate funding to maintain existing system Â· Renewal and replacement funding is key to: 1 4 Maintaining level of service in the most 1% I cost effective manner - Â· Regular repair and maintenance extends useful life ~ Â· Reduces risk and liability due to potential failures ~ ~ 4 Funding capital from rates aids utility financial ,~ stability Improves debt service coverage ratio (DSC) 41\, 8 4 , 12/10/2010 C m:&641/1-41~ 0% / 9 / i h 4 .. .. . I Total 6-year (2010-2015) - CIP is $3.98 million Average annual CIP $663,000 2010 - 2016 Â· Funding renewals and replacements (CIP from rates) is 95% of 2009 depreciation by 2015 ($550,000); 80% of 2015 proJected depreciation expense Total Water Capital (CIP) Funding â€¢ Operating Reserve 51,92/lillilling/'Imillillill"lill -4........ Sl.245 -Capital Reserve â€¢New Revenue Bond i Capitai Funded 5300 5512 Through Rates 10 5 12/10/2010 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenue Chargefor Service $2,993 $2,993 $3,022 $3,053 $3,083 $3,114 Miscellaneous Revenue 49 49 33 39 35 33 Total Revenue $3,041 $3,041 $3,056 $3,092 $3,118 $3,147 Expenses Total 0&M $2,592 $2,643 $2,714 $2,914 $2,962 $1072 ./76 Taxes a nd Tra nsfers 223 223 228 230 233 235 CIP Funded Through Rates ~ 150 175 250 350 450 550. 1 Net Debt Service 480 393 374 375 383 397 Total Expenses $3,444 $3,434 $3,566 $3,869 $4,028 $4,254 Balance/(Deficiency) of Funds ($403) ($392) ($510) ($777) ($910) ($1,107) Addt'I Taxes/Franchise Fees ($33) ($32) ($42) ($63) ($74) ($90) I q , Total Balance/(Deficiency ($436) ($424) ($552) ($841) ($984) ($1,197) 42Â· Balanceas *of Revfrom Rates 14.6% 14.2% 18.3% 27.5% 31.9% 38.5% Proposed Rate Adjustment 0.0% 6.4% 6.8% 6.8% 6.8% 6.8% (*@"52 â€¢ Using 50% of system development charges toward debt service ~A â€¢ Transition of CIP from Rates: 2010 at $150,000; 2015 at $550,000 11 , 1 # Projected 2011 Rate Revenues By -â€¢â€¢â€¢â€¢rr--- Customer Class ($00Os) 51'~~ $781 m Residential Urban 58~ â€¢ Residential Rural , Commercial Urban 5814 â€¢Commercial Rural 1 Bulk Projected 2011 Expenses ($00Os) CIPFrom Net Debt, 'h. Rates,$175 w * 1.-4( $3~~ 4-- 19* . .., 4 ; L~~~r *. -IM I/,1 'R' . .T0~~~M, ' 6 12/10/2010 1Financial_PlanningConsiderations 4'~ ./.Ill ' e ' ee,u,-/ .9,- p Â»./ .~ 9â€ž ,%.'. ' h.â€ž,~I/,~V~N,!â€¢â€ž<~ A 7 , - 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 3 Debt Service Coverage Ratio (Includes SDCs, water rights, bulk wtrsurcharges) Before Rate Adjustment 0.88 0.81 0.53 0.43 0.26 After Rate Adjustment 1.30 1.75 2.01 2.46 2.83 Fund Balance Fund Balance 0&M $1,334 $1,054 $879 $814 $813 Target 90 Days of O&Mexpense 707 725 775 788 815 Above orBelow Target Balance $627 $328 $104 $26 ($2) Total Fund Balance $1,427 $1,263 $866 $909 $1,029 â€¢ Rate adjustments needed to meet debt service coverage 4 With SDCs, water rights, and bulk water surcharges revenue, 1.25 DSC Is met by utility; 1.1 DSC needed for 2008 bond Issue â€¢ Funding capital projects from rates helps utility meet DSC e~b: 90 days 0&M target met through 2015 2 i~Iâ‚¬ 13 F""~ Water Rate Transition Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Monthly Residential Urban Customer Bill $36.75 Proposed Water Rate Adjustments 6.4% 6.8% 6.8% 6.8% 6.8% Rate After Proposed Rate Adjustment $39.10 $41.76 $44.60 $47.63 $50.87 Monthly Bill Change $2.35 $2.66 $2.84 $3.03 $3.24 Cumulative Bill Change 52.35 $5.01 $7.85 $10.88 $14.12 â€¢ Average of urban residential customer class at existing rates â€¢ Provides level of rate adjustments f * -/ ak â€¢ Proposed rates addressed within rate design analysis i /1//1 14 r / , 12/10/2010 Present Rate Allocated Tax $ % Class of Service Revenues Costs Adjustment Difference Difference Residential $1,831 $1,972 $12 ($153) 8.4% Commercial 956 1,184 19 (246) 25.7% Pumped Flow 125 136 1 (12) 9.3% Bulk Water 80 93 1 (14) 17.0% Total $2,993 $3,385 $32 ($424) 14.2% Cost of Service is a snap-shot in time Results considered within cost of service when within 5% +/- of the overall result (9.2% to 19.2%) Class differences do exist Recommend across the board adjustments, due to level *Ilk of adjustments; interclass adjustments increase impacts 15 -F. . ..111..........1.-1.1.-I"Ii/'I. .al--at..... 4.2[1&L . I m . '.. . , 10 1 , = Â£* .1, fis 16 0 / i 8 12/10/2010 Â· Easy to understand Easy to administer Equitable and non- discriminating (cost-based) u,~ ~~ Provide revenue stability Promote conservation/ efficient use of resource i~ ~ Economic development Â· Those who benefit should pay T --1.--=7 The problem of competing goals! 44 17 m: IP Â· Water: Maintain basic rate structure 4 Option 1: Apply AWWA meter capacity ratings to all customer rates 4 Water Option 2 - Apply AWWA meter capacity ratings gradually over three years 18 9 12/10/2010 .il'ktm/kNK/|14:11241"1'111'10,1-le Jek,4 4 Â»e . I 4 4 ... - i ' . 1 'f/& 1 7 Existing Meter Charges and Weighting Factors Mater Cha,ges Presed Edill"g AWW;A wah AWWA Mater Meter We-*91'* -A"Wh, Pnlamedltal Size Ch-ges inch Mier 34*=h I,Werl -Ye- 1 5/Wi $17.90 1.00 1.00 $17.90 3/4' 17.90 1.00 1.00 17.90 1, 19.67 1.10 1.67 29.89 1 1/2' 23.90 1.34 3.33 59.61 2" 26.85 1.50 5.33 95.41 3" 61.59 3.44 10.00 179.00 4" 86.32 4.85 16.67 298.39 11] We~ting factorbased on AWWA 3/.-inch safe operating meter equhalencies. . I 19 f j , 1 . D. . 00 0 .11 & A a - :': - Present Proposed Rate$ 2011 2012 2013 propond Rate Adjuitment ' Â« ' 64% 6-8% 62% Urban Customers Monthly Meter Charge 5/8 3/4" Â£17.90 $19.05 $2035 $21.75 1" 17.90 19.05 20.35 21.75 1-1/2" 19.67 31.80 33.95 36.25 2â€ž 23.90 63.45 67,75 72.35 2685 101.55 108.45 115.80 4" 61.59 190.50 20345 217.30 86.32 317.55 339.15 362.20 Â¢h Consumption (per 1,000 gallons) 444% Residential All Consumption 53.77 53.96 S4.23 S4.52 Commercial 2 All Consumption $3.67 $3.50 $3.74 $3.99 P'; All Consumption $5.28 $5.45 35.82 $6.22 :Â· ~f. Pumped Flow 4--t . Bulk Water Uniform $4.22 53.50 33.74 $3 99 ..1 Future Volume Surcharge' 2.83 773 7.96 8.20 /' . - â€¢ Bulk water surcharges should be increased by the ENR-Ca each year (3%) â€¢â€¢â€¢Rural customersaresubject a 60% rated,fferentialto urban customers 20 10 12/10/2010 a f'.Â¥Â¥ A BE . . .. .0 .1 - 0 4 1 11 .,. 4/â‚¬2444*e-/ A,~ ~i Present Proposed - V. ,.~- .1~ Rates 2011 2012 2013 Propond Rate Adjustment 6.496 6.8% 6.8% Urban Customers Monthly Meter Charge 5/8 3/4 $17.90 $19.05 $20.35 $21.75 1" 17.90 19.05 20.35 21.75 1-1/2" 19.67 24.80 30.60 36.30 2" 23.90 39.00 55,90 72.45 3" 26.85 42.15 73.20 115.95 4" 61 59 96.20 157,70 217.50 86.32 153,40 259.50 362.55 Consumption (per 1,000 gallons) Residential A|| Consumption $3.77 S3.96 $418 $4.40 41 0 Commercial All Consumption $3.67 $3.76 $3,85 $3.90 IJ .C Pumped Flow All Consumption $5.28 55.55 $5 81 $6.08 Bulk Water ' Uniform $4.22 $4.25 $4 25 54.25 -' ~ ~ '~~4, :~ Future Volume Surcharge* 2.83 7.73 7,96 8.20 Â¥ 4, * * Bulkwater surcharges should be increased bythe ENR-CCI each Yea' (3%) *'Rural customer, are 5ubject a 60% rate differential to urban customers 21 / The Town of Estes Park A Residential (Urban) Customers Monthly Rates Proposed 2011 - Option 2 - Phased in AWWA Meter Weighting Meter Volume Present Proposed Dmerence Size (per 1,000 qals.) Rates Rates Amount Percent - rr 3/4" ; 0 $1790 $19.05 $1.15 6 04% 5 36.75 3885 2.10 541% 10 55.60 58.65 3,05 5 20% 15 74.45 78.45 4.00 5,10% 20 93.30 98.25 4.95 5 04% 25 11215 11805 5.90 5.00% 30 13100 137.85 6.85 4 97% 35 149.85 15765 7.80 4.95% t!Â£4 -:- r PRESENT RATES 2010 PROPOSED RATES 2011 I * Base Charae Monthly Base Charge Monthly 4 - $17.90 5/8 $19.05 3/4" 17.90 31 4 19.05 10Â£ 1" 19.67 1" 24.80 1-1/2" 23.90 1-1/2" 3900 2685 2Â·Â· 42.15 3" 61.59 51 96.20 4" 86.32 4" 153.40 M Volume ($ / 1,000 gil) Volume ($ / 1,000 gal) -I Uniform $3.77 Uniform 22 $396 V / / i 11 1Â· 7 6. 12/10/2010 711 Mill~:11*1. *, 11*5 4 \\ 871', 142 :fl N.-31 0, fl -11, + . 1, 4 / // 23/ 1, 1. 111 - % 111 1 1~ 1 111 . F 7/9./., â€¢ Total 6-year (2010-2015) CIP is $7.6 million 4 Average of $1.28 Million/year â€¢ Funding CIP from rates is 99% of projected depreciation expense by 2015 4 Transitions from $600,000-2010 to $950,000 by 2015 Total Light & Power Capital (CIP) Funding ($00Os) 54,850- . Operati ng Reserve ~~ +G Â» I i Capital Funded ~ Through R, tes S2.834 -4 4 24 f y. 12 12/10/2010 1 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenues Charge for Service $11,864 $11,923 $12,042 $12,163 $12,284 $12,407 Miscellaneous Revenue 470 470 520 541 554 552 Total Revenues $12,334 $12,393 $12,562 $12,703 $12,839 $12,959 Expenses Total 0&M 59,677 $10,093 $10,781 $11,507 $11,721 $11,941 Taxes and Transfers 1,363 1,393 1,397 1,411 1,425 1,439 CIP Funded Through Rates 600 750 800 850 900 950 ~ Net Debt Service 447 448 449 450 445 450 Change in Working Capital 0 0 100 (24) 0 0 Total Application of Funds $12,088 $12,685 $13,527 $14,194 $14,491 $14,780 Balance/(Deficiency) of Funds $246 ($292) ($965) ($1,490) ($1,652) ($1,821) Balance as % of Rev from Rates -2.3% 28% 9.1% 13.9% 15.2% 16.6% Proposed Rate Adjustment 0.00% 2.80% 1.40% 1.40% 1.40% 1.40% 25 F / 0 . .0/0 - 1 . a . 11. 1 5. ,,, Projected 2011 Rate Revenues By Customer Class ($0006) . @eÂ£,iMba I Re*derUD"and S785 â€¢ Resde,1018.*700 ~ 536 -5411 55,115 ~~66 â€¢ Lar,eC/rine,ual â€¢ La"Conne.*(AtrsÂ·,> 2 Large(hnne,0~100 52/ 1 1 \3448 â€¢ Mjkpal S301 JS14 . Ot.X*lig#*3 Projected 2011 Budgeted Expenses ($000s) â€¢ Total 0&M I Â· fl~ 510,093 - â€¢ Taxes and Transfers ' I. â€¢CIPFunded Through -1 Rates 1 Net Debt Service 5448/ 5750 51.393 13 12/10/2010 Financial Planning Considerations 2013 2014 2015 Electric DSC ratios - all debt Before Rate Adjustment 2.89 2.97 2.43 2.23 2.07 1.83 After Required Rate adjust 2.89 2,68 3.25 3.28 3.51 3.62 ~ --1.4 â€¢ CIP Funding from rates helps utility meet debt service coverage â€¢ 90 days 0&M target met through 2015 1 i 27 4 1. - - - 1. L&P Rate Transition Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Present Ave. Monthly Residential $51.15 Proposed Electric Rate Adjustments 2.80% 1.40% 1.40% 1.40% 1.40% Projected Ave. Monthly Residential Electric Bill $52,58 $53.32 $54.06 $54,82 $55.59 $ Change Per Month $143 $0.74 SO.75 $0,76 $0.77 Cumulative $ Change Per Month $1.43 $2.17 $2.91 $3.67 $4.44 FA th Â· Rate adjustments for present rate structures â€¢ Rate adjustment in 2011 Is related to power costs, future rate adjustments needed for funding capital improvements â€¢ Specific rate adjustments are developed In rate design 28 7 , 14 12/10/2010 Â· ~ Present Tax Adjust. ../4/... *.. Rate Allocated With Rate $ % Class of Service Revenues Costs Increase Difference Difference Residential $5,315 $5,676 ($47) ($409) 7.7% Residential Demand 785 836 17) ($58) 7.4% Residential Energy TOD 411 438 (4) ($31) 7.6% Residential Basic TOD 36 36 0 $0 -0.9% Small Commercial 2,449 2,320 17 $146 -6.0% Small Commercial TOD 24 22 0 $2 -7.4% Large Commercial 2,139 2,149 (1) ($11) 0.5% Large Comm. Primary 448 432 2 $19 -4.2% Large Commercial TOD 14 14 (0) ($1) 6.4% Municipal 301 288 2 $15 -5.0% 4%. Outdoor Area Lights 2 4 (0) (52) 86.6% ./ Total $11,923 $12,215 ($38) ($330) 2.8% // Â· Similar to water, snap shot in time; within 5% +/- Â· Lower adjustments allow for modified implementation of cost of service: 4 Commercial rates held to 2010 levels, helps to minimize adjustment to residential rates 29 Â¥ ./.MIN'./. hA 4 Option 1 - Gradually increase customer 91 -'' L&P - Maintain basic rate structure charge over three years 4 Option 2 - Same as Option 1, but Implementing a minimum bill for residential and small commercial m. customer classes 49#*4. 30 15 12/10/2010 ...1 . .1 1 ..1- I .. 1,1 .1 - 1 - I . - .- -F'-Â¢I~ ./"I."'ll-/.il' 24 2011 2012 2013 Residential Customer Charge - $/Month $6.00 $6.35 $6.70 Energy Charge - $/kWh $0.10117 $0.10210 $0.10305 Residential Demand [1] Customer Charge - $/Month $7.00 $7.35 $7.70 Energy Charge - $/kWh $0.05867 $0.05943 $0.06021 Demand Charge - $/kW $10.33 $10.48 $10.62 Residential Energy TOD Customer Charge- $/Month $7.00 $7.35 $7.70 Energy Charge - $/kWh On-Peak $0.11620 $0.11758 $0.11900 Off-Peak $0.05806 $0.05875 $0.05946 7 44 Residential Basic TOD [2] Customer Charge - $/Month $7.00 $7.35 $7.70 614E Energy Charge - $/kWh $0.11653 $0.11814 $0.11946' ~ 2 On-Peak Off Peak $0.09332 $0.09461 $0.09567 0/1 9 31 1 . . 24<.r /1011 . .. 1 , 0 A 2011 2012 2013 Small Commercial 58.52 59.so $9.85 Customer Charge - S/Month Energy Charge - $/kWh $0.09740 30.09801 $0.09919 Small Commercial TOD Customer Charge Â· $/Month $9.69 $10.50 $10.85 Energy Charge - 5/k,Wh On-Peak $0.12056 SO.12205 $0.12356 Off-Peak So.05286 SO.05351 $0.05417 Large Commercial Customer Charge - $/Month $11.75 $13.00 $13.35 Energy Charge - $/kWh $0.04435 $0.04493 SO.04555 Demand Charge - $/kW $10.83 $10.98 $11.14 Â· ~ (>4 Large Commercial (Primary) ',â€ž31 Customer Charge- $/Month $11.28 $12.48 $12.82 Â£ Energy Charge - $/kWh SO.04258 SO.04313 $0.04373 0 0 0 0 Demand Charge - SAW $10.40 $10.54 $10.69 * 4 . large Commercial TOD Customer Charge - S/Month $15.00 $15.35 $15.70 ' Energy Charge Â· 6/kWh On-Peak SO.05971 SO.06050 SO.06142 ' 011-'Peak SO.03237 $0.03280 50.03330 Demand Charge - S/kW $13.03 $13.21 $13 40 9.W. Municipal Customer Charge - S/Month 50400 SO.00 $O.00 Energy Charge - $/1Wh $0.09164 $0.09292 SO.09422 4.-'-r-/ Outdoor Lights - $/Light/Month $10.48 $10.62 $10.77 16 12/10/2010 0, 0 ~-,Mer 4*Â· The Town of Estes Palic Light and Power Residential Bill Comparison Residential - Option 1 Option 1 kWh Present Rate Proposed Rate $ Change % Change $4.70 $6.00 $1.30 27.7% 100 14.50 16.12 1.62 11.2% 200 24,29 26.23 1.94 8.0% 300 34.09 36.35 2.26 6.6% 400 43.88 46,47 2.58 5.9% e 2 600 41 _ ~10, z~ 63.48 1~ 66.70 5~ 3.23 4~~5,1% 92.86 900 97.05 4.19 4.5% 1200 122.25 127.40 5.15 4.2% 1500 151.64 157.76 6.12 4.0% 1800 181.03 188.11 7.08 3.9% 2100 210.41 218.46 8.04 38% f 4~ Customer Charge ($/Mod $4.70 $6.00 all' Energy Charge ($/kWh) $0.09796 $0.10117 33 3 1 1 ,- - ' id-1 r.1.- O 1,I J r,7 .TJw---y~Tg~- - 6 . 01 0 . *. 'eÂ»Nee")2~"T .?/,vvi /' l ~I I ~1~ / ~-; ~~i A~, a ID â€ž~ f>/t09,mjee~(*4Â·lt'lh>13'*ekkii,Ilil luiv<,4~~9Mpll/"/"I"...31r 1./ 1:iMI"m/-./.......#/ Proposed Rates 2011 2012 2013 Residential Customer Charge - $/Month $6.00 $6.35 $6.70 Minimum Bill - $/Month $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 Energy Charge - $/1<Wh $0.09884 $0.09979 50.10075 Small Commercial Customer Charge - $/Month $8.52 $9.50 $9.85 Minimum Bill- $/Month $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 Energy Charge - $/kWh $0.09624 $0.09686 $0.09804 34 17 12/10/2010 Â· One-time fee for new customers ~ 4 Equitable share of system costs . Â· State Law - 31-35-402...(f) - m ~ 'Authority to assess rates and charges for ./.I 1 connecting to utility systems.' - ;n#- / 37 Â· Component by component basis 1~ 4 Replacement cost method 'i ; 14 4~ Â· System planning criteria ~ 1 4 Master Facility Plans 1 Â· System financing criteria - 1 4 Debt credit, developer contributions Purpose - Growth pays for growth 4 Provide equity between existing and new customers 4 Generate revenue for growth related facilities Â· Those who benefit should pay; growth related portions /*Water System Development Charge CalculatignimMits 1 Source of Supply $2,812 Storage Distribution 1,179 2 General Plant 94 29 2 Debt Service Credit o , 22 Total $4,923 4 4. Net Allowable Water SDC $4,920 Existing SDC - $/ERU $4,940 *j) ?f U~ $ Change per ERU -$20 #91 36 I. -3?A 18 12/10/2010 Purpose - Water rights to serve growth W..1/.~.. 4 Provide equity between existing and new customers 4 Generate water rights or revenue for future water rights Those who benefit should pay 4|~ Rights Calculationl- Colorado Big Thompson Water Rights Assumptions: Annual ERU Usage (acre/feet) [1]: 0.22 Loss of water in distribution system [2]: 13% Expected yield of Colorado Big Thompson (CBT) Water units [3] 62% CBT price per unit 2002 $11,150 Cost escalated per BLS inflation from 2002 [4] 1.22 Escalated CBT cost per unit $13,600 CBT Water Rights Calculation: [1]/cl-[2])*1/.62*$13,600 $5,550 ~~ Current fee is $5,450, or a $100 increase t/ 37 4 4 --: ffll,Â¥i'#Fi a~:1Tr';li~m;E,ME~ - I.'"-=-I-4.-1-I"'IMMIâ€¢Â¥*.-' vtg~04*4~4~ Bulk Water 33Â¥otal Bulk Water 2 Water System Development Charge Calculation Results , r': Share [1] f#*f&* St]Ca,3 Source of Supply $2,812 100% $2,812 Storage 41% 483 4 838 40% Distribution 1,179 General Plant 94 100% Debt Service Credit 0 100% 0 Total $4,923 $3,724 Net Allowable Water SDC $4,920 $3,720 Water Rights Fee CBT $5,550 $5,550 f [} 335 Total Cost Per ERU $10,470 Bulk Water Fee Annual Planning Cost Per Calculated per ERU Cost/20 years Gal/ER U [2] 1,000 Gallons L Water SDC $3,720 $186.00 60,000 $3.10 Water Rights Fee CBT $5,550 $277.50 60,000 $4.63 Total Cost $9,270 $7.73 ~ ..1 '-'- 6/ 1.~11- .mi 1.1-3,9.1111%2,~ 11 1~ Â· Current fee Is $8.63 per 1,000 gallons : " re 2/ i 19 12/10/2010 0 . 0 Â· Policy Direction Needed: 7 . Recommendations: Â· Revenue Requirements: Â· Revenue Requirements 1 Timing and level of rates 1 As presented Cost of Service: Â· Cost of Service: , Implement cost of service results , Water - Across the board or apply adjustments equally , L&P - Modified cost of across the board service Â· Rate Design: Â· Rate Design: , Meter charges adjusted for water r Option 2 for both utilities 1 Customer charge increased for L&P Â· System Development Charges: Â· SDCs and Water Rights: , Level of change and timing of , Keep same 25% implementation , Adopt bulk water chrgm, I 0 . Questions and Answers and Next Steps 1 6, .1 dillil ./Alb Â¢ Â¥ 41 "1 //4 F â€¢ Set utility rate hearings 40 20 '1.- 0 3 p - T \ A---*- U--1 --6 /2-n -0-' :. 42/ 82 4 ,â€žr -9.-4 i .A tf I r 4:~~~ .- 2 0 N 1,~ .010:,2.i K*.sot////- *PX 1~, MacGREGOR ONE / m Ljf' 1 IIA <C a. Z O LU i I. \ 5 0 +t 0 1 ,\ 0 , 9 -U- PARK LAAE Â¢Â¢>~ UIJA.4- l1 *12 SO % 90 , . -,1 (3 \ 11 I ' ' \ I 1 1 '' Â£4*A ---- * .J .4,0//Il///F, ->h~.. -, \ 10 7 AVEROE 1 -/f'.2,~ \\ ' ' v. 000 --*92Â«Ufff--'---1 4 3< :1 - L... ' \U -",6 Lf b â€¢r' - 'U '11 :j 2 1 â‚¬ h '495.--- \ U - 1 \â€¢A - \ U 4 ~ ..r 11 1 1 U.1 E : 2 N 4 U 1 -=2222Â·11~.4-422:2.-- ZO 64/ 6 \ 1 < Z 6 < p"'C: -J O -9-''j -d,/1 0 4.\ ~ 20 Z \ I " \ 4 ....... i Qb : m >0 3 44 i.0 <Z f 4 1 144> . 05 C 9\ \ 461 44 F I \0, 10\ ~- ,-93 22 1.- 1- 2~ \ I 1-11-Z** zy. 3 -- I.- 1.~ i-/ LU PARK LANE lie--6 40 g ./0/ V.-B '44 0.- B 03-3 6 -- --9~13 -3 vAl ., 20 33---11 4 TOWN HALL in OAÂ¥1 a SOdOhld SNOI S3NÂ¥1 13AVhll TOWN HALL \ ,/ I '/ /3 4.--,1 9% I 1 1 \,fl 11>53 4 1 1 o 4.-5-.- ~ \ f h ---4-jer .* 9 ty_13~2<. ,Â»23-'' ~---- fr--- \ t 0. --&2.(. --*'trieki. \1 - --039Â£-7 \ 255.3-5-- I --- -' 232:Z-*--05232Â·__ .- 1 \ A OSS-/5 1- , - --1--- --11.-- I.-- ; I 14 c 4 I \ 4--A ---9121*. -* -*_-* ~ N . . : U| 2.#,.665.*-/3-/2--- '. / / -,- N ' 'L 1 11 6.-- $ 4 11 , 4 4 \ \ 4 ' t-1 i :V'\ l.-4 1,4--1 Â»3 li 1 , .,0 % ,;: 2 b.-,1 / 1 0 \ lo t ==J, 1 t 413 P. 1 1 - N. 1 \\40 1% \ 9 - (75 -.. j , ------ \ 922. 9.' 2.2-" '467- QP' 1 " . I & A 40.3 -562- 4*42 44/ O 1 99 ..... \. 1 Â· ./9 ./ 1< , 1 7% I. \ f I . lili 9 . . I \ LU C BLE! D OZ O 2< 0 -1 2~ * D 0 < 0 0- Z 1- O 0 NO Z X O W 05 -1 < 1- 0- 0 4 O +4 U-1-1- @WZ>D 5%53 0 (90*4 2 t i R U.1 0 0- 1- *Pol 01[-1-05 -1%(f): <0 0 aghgcnke 2% m R o w amCD 05 DI O Lfi a 1 0 U) LU O W Z LI Q_ 34 > (f) Li.J 0. 3t LU Z <C LU O 1- LULU (nzz L.1 < 0 0 J LU (X D n' M Z LU O - 05 <5-'Of 6 I fl- <LU 5%5 / 20*99 =2 26 /4 cv /-3. WOW OZss ZWO Z <How , 9 G W 5 a < JO , > (f) 05 MLU IW , XE:<52 CE j Ar, 1 1 < Le a , 1 0 Lo w p z V !6 05 N 201 f h a: u~ < CE D Â» LU 0 KN - O * 05 V LLI * LU 0 W 1- 00 ZLJO_Z ing I <40 W 63 Q -J Ju J > 0. O W MWIW 2 Z Safso- p a 00 D Ejilri 0 n 1 3Â» % <C X R LU O <C LU O EXIST CURB NORTH AINAGE EAST ROP C RB SET WITH a NV EINAO PROPOSED PA TERED REVERSE SUPE -E ROADWAY ROS - L EXISTING PARK CROSS- LO XIST CURB SOUTH SIDE REV RS PROPOSED P EXISTING P REV RSE Z 0 0 \1 Â§45\ ////1- --- ZE \te *06 \ -\...+ 01- ZEd \\ 3%: %28 9& 4 0 830 b Lu 1-- E z W LU U. O U <SE 3 z 6 14.reÂ£ 4 - Ill Â» No (/) 00 :,M . 1*YeD. ZO Je.,2 \ e, LL, 1- \23 -+ \ f U U.1 \\l\ SE =1 < Â£L 82 \ 2 8, M I Mi 5 0 0 k X 4 < B4OO'4ia-- >7Â»64453 1---- 1919/-1 41 \ 6-L~ JI -iwr~L .49 1- VT i LU r, 9 f. Â· 1*PE - - '--- 1-<*'2 4%2 M, 9 I 1 0-,i---E *.5%'rAOÂ«62Â« &-7Â·.. ,>Ret slur DÂ£ f:rk=ht ~ < \ 0 .------ \01. GORz- Cjo \ + W \ 4- 4- j W(199*0 z 03 \ 0 '1 ULLI~J~~~ 2---WÂ«vuyÂ»1 -- . + 0 0 U t. un - 4 , L//1 (2 4 Â«b * 4 1 \ \ \i i B,tt 5 2/ ~1 00 f :/r-.r-k , A Elec M. 9-\ \ \ *%27 l -9 DZ W / & 0 2 'LI / / -02 G <3% Aki / 5 \44 Â¥ , 1~0. i:0 9- \ - 0 16 i V , Oa,D X44 1 1 Ot CD Z \14\\th 4 \ tze 0 '1\ % 1 / 4 1 D 0 \ , \ m I. 1 \ \\ Â«=239Â» 0 t & ' 1 1 i / / I ill. V\ ,\ 9 r, \ \\ . 01 , er\\ .F '1:Pr~.-'--- /5 f lit: -, 3* 15 \ ~ ~p e ".h D St'Â¢6, NON NX O /422( \\>Â«t \ Vk\ \ : 9 4\ \ \ -1 1- / 00 \IÂ» 4 90 0- \ 1 91 \\4 -74 6 \/\ e 2 \ / /[1\ //4 i 1 V h f -05 \O U / 7 \ 1 0>44 -- -44 046 \\ \ \ /// 50 47925 \ \ 1 ~U h \ V / - \ ~ 4 - Fr' 831* M. --- <Al.Vt'A 13Alkl O1NI SPOUT ~L t'Y STORM LATERA SANITA Y SEWER 241Â«11 4 L NOildO -fuRAIN f -1 UJ 01- CL \\ 0 LL 0 Â£68 E O \\ 0 g \ *OZ \ 1- 0 0 (% ~ ~ \ ---=-ijiÂ¥3- Â·-0- UJ = 39 0 ~i~ "' 0 z L'-gtow . , 4 \ M !4 3 j 8@2% 2 <20 4 D 3 t U.1 1- Z U Lu : 9 *\Le,t 19 '4'. / 0.- M U. U 45* 1.1.1 Â» \ 91 05Â¥\?0 1 f (/) 00 , 14:kl.1 - e LG 0 , Â¥.1 \03> \ \ Z u, 4 I 6\ , & 9% 4 2 \ 1% 1 4 k *Â£ V1 6 /1.-1 1 *.~D ' 4.ERIA \- Â· ele , --- + ~01<16~9 F , 4/4 * S AN DOry, st\;~â‚¬,~ .5-1 3.32 \S \ U.1 @ --- 9 - ---% piptrJ~guitjft 'FEVÂ·ect-- -/ \ p \9 \ ji43(fl,5~~~/~k P\?t- - sgo i &A \ li 0 s \ 14 0\ 1.-~373 -- /r, 0 4.-,- / 00.0 \\ r ./Â·' -<r- fir <3 ' I ExIt) 1 4% \- / --3~38 Z /9 -\ / 97 0 \\ 1 \\ 9 /07 / - rizo Ch 4 - - % a \-7 4- I, 1 4\ \ '_fl ' = i '3~0 A 0 \ \ /- .*4 ,:9 00 f 0- 9 1 2 0 16 i / lut , 1 , Elâ‚¬C -00 it t 1 1%\ \ \ 59"/ / . //// - 58 l / ARZ* 9 ... 4/04 1# \\4\ 5 - QMfal - 2 34) g \I0 4 ' e. la %' e-4 9 \ - 0 0 0 , - Â»\3 s & e Z 1, 1, 6 2 * Un 32 \ 1- \ 7 0 k J ./ LA 6 \\ W f \\ , ./ - 00 h n 0 \ 2 ./.i . .Al \ 422Â»- 'I / ..t g \ 1 \\\ 4 f #.\ \ -4- \ \1 91 .. SEvel-,//. 00 / 1.Â·i -St 3 \ \ UT-h spf,<* SO, t X 4> .QrÂ¥1Â·> 1 Ept,yt 947 X \\ 9 0 \ 2\ 6 \Vol- 0, 9 r 4- 40 233-~ F 4, \ i.>. IL_J - \-PKE/-9/4 1 44 V 0< \ I 914 1din:/4 Â«\ 90* 5 3 \N>*4.<. -0Â£-.:/ \\ \ 49 (f} \ \ \ ~94 //// cyÂ» O \9, v \ 1 \ \ 1741% C?-2-0. \ -lÂ© 9\ .0.1 4. .Itt \ / j1 es.N '1 th '7 i *VtÂ¢\ \ -3 .ey ABAIN O1NI WWO1S 11Â¥01nO------Z__- E L ad SPOUT -trinion ff A.L 13-' ECTIONS ITA Y SEWER 10' TYPE R INLET SERVICE IN TALLED TOWN HALL 01\111\14, TR NCH DRAIN Z I 0> =1 :h D 0 \ D ~ W %2 0 ' 18 Cl- 2 Â» U.1 - t/) /\ O 4 to >- 0 <*z @2 \Â§ i:~fLJ *ZO WEEQ M E ?\FE- / /- 9 96 30 04 (0*Z f ti i ' SY?â‚¬1, \ 33 0 k \1 RZo 6 * \ r -tl t= A ms=g Â»- Mu-OU Zu!:!2 \ 3 1 virt -34; .., 3Zt = Ul Â» 4 0 00 :t>,\?0 2 4 5/ I ,# 6 5 -1 *2 0 E E.R 4 04--1 -4 A \ Zizz 9Â©--' , 2835 ec \NEN , 411â€ž vv 1 + ~ LL 00 52*0--- ---- -13jÂ£450 3 1-9%9---f \4\\ d:35 ABANDON SEWER -1.1 2/ Â· 0" 'bia b~42 bA32fz- END 1 1 6 6 4 1 1- A ~ Nt -+~ //////~ ZEfil 6.1 e cGREGOR ~ - 1,8/ * Ar-74 , 1 A d.1 \ bil\91Â»Â«//890 \ p i .&11 C) 9 / 04 , ' Z e 232Â¥ep. / 4 87 2 E // fo'~Â¢~'A \ ' 1 5 4 \ 0 4 i j. 1142=6%0 1 ':tw 00 j Fvt#(/ c '' / - 00 ~r . .- 7\ \\ 320 11, ua- 99 , , - El.EC - \ *\ \A \ 0 \ 9 r hi \ 14 9 \ 0 0 , 91 w i '4 2. Ul I 9 2 3, U, i \ 444\ 1 6 toz , -1 * un Lf' ' 0/0 9 1 \\ 1 h \ tz 0 6 eÂ« 1 U. 1 9 1 +4 1 ; i \ \\ 4 / ,<e i / -34 1- \\1 \.\ ~:*< SiVÂ·.4 E,_~*~0 0 i /1 ') 43 i ~ SAN *40, '2 $ \\ h. ?00. \Â©K â‚¬* 'ds. 1 60 9 29â‚¬ 5 PE ) Â·, 1 Â·A~ 19 1/ 1 \ a X \4 01 9 9 8 6 9 Y' t _.,-74'&.ig. 6 3 \-P34Â£ \\ \ .Â·0/ / ...../.-/- 43\ \ ju/Â». 7% 3 .11 1 / fir~'' \ LAÂ· ~\ \\ X -C iliX-*t -1 / -- 1 19 4449 74::5 - -10 1 3 IN O1NI Bdld DOWNSPO T TOWN H ALL Â«tbilll'll bl 39V Ols little\ -I NCH DRAIN 12/14/2010 . r 1,~ Storm Sewer Outfall -,~p,-4 Conceptual Design Plan MacGregor Avenue Town Board Study Session Ii,E. December 14,2010 ~ .' Townof Estes Park *: -*' . - 9 4.'1' 11 r - .4 b . ' ... . Discussion Items Â£ i Traffic Flow Pattern for Park Lane Â·Â· One-way Traffic on MacGregor Avenue * Increased Two-way Traffic on Park Lane b Park Lane - Reversed Super-Elevation + ExistingCondition negative 3.8 percent cross-slope * Typical negative cross-slope 2 percent s Storm Sewer Outfall * Uses Existing Easement to River * Helps Mitigate Local and Regional Drainage Issues + Allowsfor Park Sod Underdrain System Â·:Â· Allows for Use of Porous Pavement Drainage System , Conceptual Cost Estimate Traffic Flow Patterns .Il ~iAl:3â‚¬Ry. 767*.7.TÂ·*3.194-%*91'9923NTFT"~'Illify#*.F~OFWFIip 1 , 1 \69 0/r. 11" i 9 4. 374'*ir 4 1 b â‚¬ ~'Alt \091Â· 4.. " %1820. - t TRAVEL LANES 1 RAVEL LANES EXISTINGCONDITIONS PROPOSED LAYOUT 1 ,ler 4 . 12/14/2010 III Super-Elevation - Park Lane ~0 ==I - 2 ~:V =gam P42-.32=* 44'...r.- Â·, ./%(.c C.'DI.....NA / Ar 423 LOWÂ·Poll- / 04. U,E 0.-4....4-liE Pâ€¢IFO(LA12 0..t- ...m -*-4'GE VIA CL*TER hgenq Al 4 4 19 Storm Sewer Option 1 1 IF ..,i.--14~.-.ar L .-r. -- 1=6= STORM DRAINAGE OPTION 1 Storm Sewer Option 2 il Lit,-~424.1 --r 4 .* b i,>-4>- 16*<Awfl-- _= STORM DRAINAGE OPTION 7 2 , 12/14/2010 Storm Sewer Option 3 .millf.'.-'1 - 37"i'%53'72e,8Â·'in*ne /P.----Il---lill-- t'J-:1 i,i j ~ -- 1 1:.#34/2:#45-2*6 4/ ...DI--n.-6.,WN,im...... 1 4%2/, touy f*/4#j'44 6.wr- .... 3 ,?90.7 674Â«4 5--~pl /; 23 -k-% 5-4 7 (fl. I '. f ' . 1 =%= 5TORM DUINAGE OPTION 3 Black Canyon Outfall ~ m 4 2%4133*742'24f''frN"1'3523;2tÂ«'4*fam?-1~.#6,/49' 4.N~~ 1, . 11 ' \4 9.45. . % 0 MacGREGOR OUTFALL TO BLACK CANYON In.nal-f...0.k I-â€¢i ceme,â€¢1~~19!~211-*-- M-Qâ€¢. rlm!!r~-- A â‚¬EE= .V...... 6 5 i & : = 1. , ..~ -- .... . 14.â€ž Il If , ~ . â€ž7.0 . -,â€ž1 . D e 14 1.- 7 3 . 12/14/2010 Trench Drain Detail ~ * -,- S ~#-d Â·Â·PEEe: - -=1 . I. % Mountain Landscape Concept 121 .. 0/ 48. - :, -Ii. $ 4 -- b.ii' -0... G 1 : AF - W.. -IX-/1 -4 -= 4 'll' Â©**1 . I - W..1:1 .~m 1 C. 01 >' U) & 4 ... e ..1 k.Â· Â· - ./ A *.4 . , 11, -.R pr. A. ... 16 . 14 9 1. 5 t' 1- a f... : r t.,AEGL~... ' 'I' . (1*7.11 / 1*-E Ut + A .1.0 41'141: ., it ' .. IJ Aftd .â€ž,--Ii/&~1 F NE Z .91.-1 .. . P... I, A 27*441 ' M Â¥?t/Jl ' . 4 4 . 1.4.,+9. . I 9 #%:**& d 00 0 . 10' lli-. IN~i.1,=a,~A=,aU,U~=uU-.Il-=u. . I . - 1 , n A i -- Se~ Uf Sessio LOZ 0*L Je tuao *1~6././.*.*I' 1*El . 1 1 + 0 ta~b . m C . = J (0 -~14 C .-I.Im' . i LU 0, ... U 0 0. 0- 0 -9& 0$ 1-J' O A c- (1)2 5 . co. U) (11,-* UJE -8 1-'~ 1 - -22- ril- 0 LIW . 214:il .83 LU W 61" CU (1) co 1- f.m 9 0- _ a) 0 ~Â¤ m U. r, EL .0 - 1,4,R h~ 1 1.. C 0 ..... 1- 04 014 OL CD . -~ CD 0(0 CO :1=51 3/ z g E co 6, 9 W 01 noe 4-< ~~ ~- /6 46 'A VJ - al O -- 71 O.- J- 9 09 .sv U)1 , 1.4 'A 6-* Lt.U -B CDS J LU 3 0 *â€¢E o .- - (L. E o. u), -. V - .9*. (D â‚¬ 0 - Lt- A ' -* C:, CO 02 =7 -/E#/. 6-- r--I -I 1-. B Â¢6.-0 4. L u. 04 2 (Di (D 4- 434 -3 u) 0) -wil (D LIJ 21* E 1 g 02 -, CO ,~ u~ - L J? CD .5 e. 3; -G o e (Di 4 u.#**6 ,< >~ EEYH U) a) = 2* e 0 31~ q r 1111-~ a: D I < 0 CO - rl' V *1* * ... 0 0 0-4 . rr A Aillillililillill AÂ·t ,~ t. -C dol/ssajd senssi~~e91 atieso evers d . 4soo le 'P gljÂ» o o 1 /\ 1 jO 41 0~14 , 1 .-_~0~52- . 11 L , 0-t j j 4 0 01* % 4 0 0/ 0 31. 2/2, 4% t, F- t.â€ž 6.* L k 15 1.30~4'. -: . -**Spr L ,14 4 1 . -1 1\\ \ Ctic Oll I t. 4 4 1- . I m ab lrIOAV-1 039OdOkld SNOI1IONOO 9NllSIXEl Traffic Flow Patterns SENV-113AVhll g-*te r\V-\-//A,LA 1*El \ 7 L-23%%. k#: i , 'tk 92,2- / .- 4Â·. ./,=#00'f~:SS=/ \- \ --h 3 \ -.%-p/ L- \ 1 / L g -Â« tey 4 il 82 4-* t< \/ 1 \,0 1 G W Eu, m2% m CE: Z 0-0 niL m ' 24 C; gitil 3 68 003 0 *15 > m *M~ - k. B 0 Ul G M z 8 r r @03 Ul r# <34" i UJ k A Â£ 2 7 01(031 oili 1, Z 2e3% C , ed Woull- pEE j %!2%4 . 0/ m .19'm 3 &8119 Super-Elevation - Park Lane S H/no ElarIO 13,3 SNOTV VI 30YNIVIO 04Â¤ AÂ¥MDÂ¥041 0114 d 1*El 1 r 4=- B 4.11 11! / it1 mt Ini ill 4 0 9 -0 - FL &&*pt - .. \ 5 Br % , , \\,10 r' 1 e 4 - r.lijdis~ 9 ligal 0 ..2 \tt fi t.1 1 --Â·15\ ./.3 0 \\ 1 + -13 0 ,/ 4\\ A 3 Storm Sewer Option 1 39VN a Ii\\\\Ii\%*D \i 11~U~ VE,015 1*El f 14 U- ... 4 . 11 1 7 Fl + 1â€¢ .. 1.1: ilf _ Z 11 8 au liz U+*+~.~ < 1 11\ \1 Ul . 1 m //540 4 0* \\ \17 2z e , 1% 02 0 + 71 9 ~~ . 1\, ~ l == 0~ a + u lig D k E % 0/ ./1 4 - ... U. 00,\ 3 4 / S. Oil 40 / . Â» 11-/0 ~~ 1 Storm Sewer Option 2 ~ 0.11.. 101Â¥1 1 1*El 1! = <4 \N ... 0 -= emin 9,1 . Un r, i 1 ei.a * 40' 4460- 0/i 00 \ ~44 a\P 0 1 ,\\ 1 j 140 0 14 i 0 1\ t J / 0 <1 1 3120 0 1 -2- 1 Storm Sewer Option 3 39VNI Ols +O% 1 1*El ; / .f 1 \ ---taa 1 1 . 4 /1& /7 \\ ' / " 1, ' j Z 9 \1\\ O Z A\\ 6 " I /1 #' 1 1 \ 4 \ '11 \\ * / 9 /- v~: 40; i~li i / ./9 9.le 0- 0 d 1 0/. A Pr 52..,- E \1 14*- 41441(/ / 1 .&*.k If Ur. ----11 9 3212' 1 Black Canyon Outfall - 71V:IlrIO hIOE)BkIDOBVy >lovie 01 4 4.44, 2 (8288:Ngrggg E 8 8* 9 h. 10 0 00. 00. ON N ON N 00'00 (D N. N 01 ~ % - r N LD r â€¢- W N 6 5 ci 81 35-E*.3 3 %5 3.26-ER-mm. 0 1- 0 64 â‚¬4 ta ta 64 ta 6/} in th te 64 * te 64 e ta 6 ta 6 64 48 0 68 0 64 68 64 49 0 e e A V> in 64 0 0 te 888EE9Â§ 292588,8 888E98 A-%8#Er, tr) lo (9 â€¢-- 10 N 1 m N 0 0 'r' 0 64 0 68 64 /8 ta 0 68 69 64 â‚¬8 64 68 64 6 64 0 e 64 ta e â‚¬0 64 68 0 64 tA + 64 68 < < LL < 11 U. 11 11 LL < 11 >- > >Â· U. It >Â· U.><> S %1113*3 #WJ.W. Ill LLI -1 LU J J L L -IWJ 0 0 0 -1 -10 2%â‚¬ 5--CO E 0 2 rrpe@93%#1"898922% ~N~~=M C 0 0 U 0 lit *.9 2 E O. CD - 3 0 .aa % 3.32 iyy m 2 9 5 5 2 5 M 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 % 2= - 5-2122 2% 8-R 99200026WEE 3 2 i 2 :222vv 2 * 5 H e i 0 0 0 0 9 -2â‚¬0-*NNES -25 &52 2 1â‚¬ 25%3 & ams Q 0 6. c. a. 0-= 2 6 =Â£ 0000 f f 9 9 9% % Â·1Â·94 2 -{ 3 f & t i 5 Â£ 2 H.tiof'O:Of c A a E k 0 0 4 2,= agek kko ma 2355 5; % 4%% o O 748:E# 3 8390 90: 92Â£ .ti<* 2 ,, 00 N N 2 223% N e * 10 0 K 00 0 [9 1-10 (D .00 2 23Â£ Â® 3 2..ca A C, 4 0 0 .C C 0 2 0 q> 0 C- O 0 0 k -W E E 2 2 - 1- NMHOO *- c 04 r- CN S ~ 10 0 0,2 16 C CRZ- 8 821 - 8 8 5&2 flo r Dual Type 13 Inlet - Elkhom 3.600 3.600 4,300 4,300 8,000 7.500 Sewer 8,000 r OOL'E 11 6" Flared 1.800 *03 1/*01 *SCKI) j,Un i Ile,;no enue/â„¢ 106BJOOEW - ajew!*sa *soo uolion,isuoo len,deouoo :Â£ elqel %0 94 10 ual 19 rm Sewer Concrete Roadway lace Concrete Roadway Elkhorn place Asphalt Parking Lot place Concrete Crosspan place Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk utility onstruction Cost Estimate - Vir Drive me uoudiosea AeMpeou Jieudsv >neiePIS pue Jej inÂ© 'qin Allilln Â·seleool Quilln Â·5ufe,uns gel)ni SO *!Un O UO!*d!.10500 Sewer Ae~peoal jleudsv eoeidati pue moi 12 ' Sto 461 . i 1*El '1'. 10_ . \ 1 - ' AlÂ·ill lil - .***I : 'h=ralwnil. li .. 15 i-2 i 1 N - 11. 4 - 00=1 .13& /3 2: 2 2 2 5&22 PE f 6 -%â‚¬3 : c. '- C - i' m .1 e m 1 2 1 f 145% 4 I ' :r . , * 5 ; 21, Ni 2 3 . al L - = Eu - 1 3 L E I 3 6/. [Fi = 5 & Â£, f & 4 & . 4 4 5 - -% 2 * 2 *a 4 D e /8 , ..1 FE M Ty 4 5 ?Fi . '.1.1, â€¢ J.UM~ .. 11 /i JA~I::tf , .1 Trench Drain Detail 'Pc,verLok Icc.*11Â·g device duty, 12â€¢â€¢ op nin ' T:~r::~:or:;r.ze t.noh O.Il 9,1 ,Â·0 ./helul -4/,fj dfies-Â»5' , \.A i ..... . k. 7 *F- Â· ..Â·64/4 -\ P.\ 162 , 1 .' ... I i %, hÂ¢$4 43 I .A 4-Kh - 1 X 9 15&612-. U ..1.- in 0 0, 7 ..> f .51& . - 1 2 1.- *. 1.00 -. 228 58* . ."0 0--: 7 0 rÂ·i~/01 -<1% 00 8/ r I 2 - mit --.I # illf Jir f b 00 - \ 1 1 5 4 - 2-9:*%*Fils 2 . % .3321- M. . \ ~~~~~ ~| ~~~~~~~~ rl-1--f-f f ~-l . I :, 4 + . I t~-- R. . M 3/ . 2 11 9,-1 2 1 ... \O 0 - A; \34/ .0 0/111& ( fi 1 4. 12 1/ =. ted r \ 04 7, 4 -t- '21 2 8 % 1Â·'~ + 2- 01 1 a :2 \ % p: 1 Â® Â® F 1 0\V, 5% P.. r.u) t. 4 1-/1 \ Y Â·i I 3 e \ Â»<44. 11 ic .. Â£8 22 0 ... I 15.fli 0 0 _A.~. I 4:1 FAipt . ELU, JU, .... g# 00 1 6 11 0% D .- , 4.-7/ 9 + L -41: If uKrle. ~~ 4 \\ 22; 3 - Ul y . // E E -51 W# - ~ \ \ E & 1 4% M .#4-% E&Â§2 1.LO-SO- ~.*---. 1 / / Mountain Landscape Concept 1 Slabs Existing Cottonwoo(is nNBAV Nk:,OH>413 hrub#Perennial Children' . 80104-- Shrubt 0 4.*.9.mmmE, & 14.. -11 9 .- - - ->= 1, {4 kkA** '. ./.% 1 ~~ ~ ~ '~ L Â£t ~ ~~ - 4 1 lae, 1 +A - f . 5-9-.,â€¢ . t~.0 ~ /6634*: if 3, '03/"/itia 2 Ary...1Â£ 1, 7 8 3- -,E: 4%>? lll ./.4 6 '11'. ..9Â¥/ 44 ......6 1.9 4 A 19.1 illÂ® i ~1.; J.....1A 4 . ' , I .1. I -9 Â¥ . I ...i 7 .-3 k ..0,0- - #CA 1:/:I ' I.y , li F --< r 444 11.- :~I' I '4111 1- E'-' 1.413 ::Al:- 1.i I . ' 'r I 'R, ... 1 1,4 7 .% -4 12- 9 0 ~k V:. " 4 17* , I .1 â‚¬ 1 71 .2 r. /9. 1 -, 1 Â¢ f %*. ilt i- t'.- 1.. -24 ly'.0 \ ill--I- b 0 -OOLAAiI u. rÂ·Â·- I râ‚¬ go *0401 .:12% 0 R ,.r, 2 2% 11= . -==M - i N I S X R Kiz *4 r. 1 ~ I r-4 00 LA 1- (NIEFER ) r-1 00 Le: 04 - r-1 N N 2 -Orng= Z Ul '093% (D 3 g LA 0 00 N N q m 9I - EI/ZI EZ-OZ/ZI OE - LZ/ZI 9 - E/I EI - OI/I December 2010 - December 201D January 2011 Board Study Session Channel 12 Legal Notice Website Ready al)!UV :eqj spoAeIN 00!JON lelial 00!10 N leBal 0!PeH ld3N Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Utility Bills EI ZI II OI Dec 13 14 15 20 22 62 LZ Proposed Utilities Rate Changes Public Outreach Calendar Posting to Town and Community Bulletin Boards January 2011 Utility Bills 40snu aleN # Lism 4 - -5-EZA : 2 1 2 .1-oosm rÂ·~ I - 00 I --4 N M LDER- 4 N N 1 6,1 r-!Oots;Ng - -912: 3 -SE: '- "3~%1 -.$539 2 M N N Ch 00 OZ - LI/I LZ- PZ/I Â£/Z-IE/I OI - L/Z LI- DI/Z Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 010!Wv slinsakl II OI ST LI 9I ST VI January 2011 - January 2011 Utility Bills le40 s,JoAel/\I sll!8 4!I!;n Jan 17 18 19 24 25 26 Proposed Utilities Rate Changes Public Outreach Calendar KEPL Radio Water Rate Hearing I qad IE 0!pekl ld3M Bu!.leaH alekl M.'Pal3 February 2011 43snH ale>I