The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 2010-02-09. Prepared 2/1/10 f [LE ' *Revised TOWN oF ESTES PARIC The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, February 9,2010 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. (Any person desiring to participate, please join the Board in the Pledge of Allegiance). PUBLIC COMMENT. (Please state your name and address). TOWN BOARD COMMENTS. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Town Board Minutes dated January 26, 2010, Town Board Study Session Minutes dated January 12, 2010 and Town Board Special Meeting Minutes dated January 18,2010. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, January 21, 2010. 1. 2010 Estes Valley Victim Advocates Contract. 2. Intergovernmental Agreement with Colorado State University for Mutual Assistance. B. Public Works, January 28, 2010. 1. Temporary Easement, Undergrounding of Overhead Utility Services: â€¢ Lot 1, Elley Subdivision, A Resubdivision of Lots 13,14 & 15, Thomas Resubdivision, 830 Comanche Street. â€¢ Portion of Lot 16 and 17, Amended Plat of Thomas Resubdivision of a part of Lot 41, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, 880 Comanche Street. 2. Temporary Construction Easement: â€¢ Tract 1, Deats Subdivision, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Country Club Manor Addition, 401 Elm Avenue. â€¢ Tract 3, Deats Subdivision, Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 1, Country Club Manor Addition, 411 Elm Avenue. â€¢ Tract 2, Deats Subdivision, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Country Club Manor Addition, 408 Fir Avenue. 3. Permanent Access, Utility & Drainage Easement: â€¢ Tract 1, Deats Subdivision, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Country Club Manor Addition, 401 Elm Avenue. â€¢ Tract 3, Deats Subdivision, Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 1, Country Club Manor Addition, 411 Elm Avenue. â€¢ Tract 2, Deats Subdivision, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Country Club Manor Addition, 408 Fir Avenue. 4. Permanent Easement for Underground Electric, Telephone, Fiber Optics and Cable: â€¢ Portion of Lot 16 and 17, Amended Plat of Thomas Resubdivision of a part of Lot 41, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, 880 Comanche Street. 2. LIQUOR ITEMS. 1. RENEWAL APPLICATION FILED BY EVEREST FOOD STORE LLC dba EAST SIDE EVEREST FOOD STORE, 381 S. SAINT VRAIN AVENUE. Town Clerk Williamson. 3. REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. Town Administrator Halburnt. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS. Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff for Town Board Final Action. 1. ACTION ITEMS: Mayor Pinkham: Open the Public Hearing (A). The formal public hearing will be conducted as follows: â€¢ Mayor - Open Public Hearing â€¢ Staff Report â€¢ Public Testimony â€¢ Mayor - Close Public Hearing â€¢ Motion to Approve/Deny. A. ORDINANCE #05-10, Amendments to the Wildlife Code Amendments approved with Ordinance #08-09 to the Estes Valley Development Code - Public Hearing. 5. ACTION ITEMS: 1. RESOLUTION #05-10 RE-APPROPRIATION OF 2009 ENCUMBERED FUNDS TO 2010 BUDGET. Finance Officer McFarland. 2. EXTENSION OF HDR CONTRACT FOR MARY'S LAKE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Director Goehring. 3. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN. Director Zurn. 4. ADJOURN. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. Jackie Williamson From: Admin iR3045 Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:21 PM To: Jackie Williamson Subject: Job Done Notice(Send) ***************************** *** Job Done Notice(Send) *** ***************************** JOB NO. 2343 ST. TIME 02/03 16:12 PGS. 2 SEND DOCUMENT NAME TX/RX INCOMPLETE ----- TRANSACTION OK 6672527 Greg White 5869561 KEPL 5869532 Trail Gazette 5861691 Channel 8 6353677 Reporter Herald 2247899 Coloradoan 5771590 EP News ERROR ----- 1 Town Board, February 9,2010 (#39) Good evening, While protesting the recital of the Pledge at previous meetings, I have said that religion and belief in God can hide much of what is true and real about the world around us. Some intellectual non-believers say that religion is still a good thing, even if it's based on a lie, because it gives people a moral compass and tradition which is necessary to maintain a civilized society. One of those was Irving Kristol, an intellectual also known as the "godfather of neo- conservatism," who left us with this famous quote: "There are different kinds of truth for different kinds of people. There are truths appropriate for children; truths that are appropriate for students; truths that are appropriate for educated adults; and truths that are appropriate for highly educated adults, and the notion that there should be one set of truths available to everyone is a modern democratic fallacy. It doesn't work." In other words, we should encourage ordinary people's delusional beliefs because they really aren't able to handle the truth; which is best left to the educated elite. The fallacy in that thinking is that those same delusional people will assume a false sense of superior intellect spew their perversion of the truth to their like minded brethren and rise to positions of leadership where their ignorance will bear the fruits of extremism. The tyrants of history weren't the intellectual elites but rather the ruthless populists who rose to power on the shoulders of the unenlightened mob. Much of our world is wallowing in the ignorance of organized religion, outdated tradition, and those who would exploit those beliefs. Our demise may be a self-fulfilling prophecy ifwe don't expose ourselves to the truth that may indeed, set us all free. The truth is that there is no entity coming back from the dead who will correct our mistakes. What we put asunder, no God will join together. I again ask that you refrain from perpetuating the lie and stop reciting the 'under God' Pledge. A . Thankyou, ~#240 Ad..u- 1.-3-v. David Habecker 4 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 26, 2010 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 26th day of January, 2010. Meeting called to order by Mayor Pinkham. Present: Mayor William C. Pinkham Mayor Pro Tem Chuck Levine Trustees Eric Blackhurst John Ericson Richard Homeier Jerry Miller Also Present: Jacquie Halburnt, Town Administrator, Lowell Richardson, Deputy Town Administrator Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk * . Absent: Dorla Eisenlauer, Trustee * Greg White, Town Attorney . 1 1 Mayor Pinkham called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and all desiring to do so, recited the Pledge of Allegiance. '\. N NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES & CH2M HILL - PRESENTATION OF MUNICIPAL EXCELLENCE AWARD PRESENTATION. Representatives of. both National League of Cities and CH2M Hill were present to officially present:to Mayor Pinkham and the Board of Trustees the Silver Excellence Award for the R@storative Justice program for 2009. '4 k PUBLIC COMMENT. ReneepHodgedon/Business owner spoke to the restrictiveness of the sign code and selective enforcement of the code. She stated the number of businesses out of compliance illustrates the sign code may be out of compliance with the business atmosphere in Estes Park. David Habecker/Town citizen spoke to a recent letter in the paper from the supporters of the abolishment of EPURA. The supporters stated there are a wide range of options for promoting successful growth in the valley, and he would like to hear the opportunities awaiting the town. He again asked the Town Board to refrain from reciting the under "God" pledge. Deb Thelander/Business owner requested the Town review the sign code and determine what code revisions would be best for the business owners in Estes Park. Charlie Dickey/Town citizen stated the town does not have a uniform image or theme. The theme for the town should be related to the Vision outlined by the Town Board. He requested the Board keep the theme and the Vision of the Town in mind when considering revision to the sign code. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS. Trustee Blackhurst reminded the public that the Public Works Committee meeting would be held on Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. in the Town Board Room. Mayor Pinkham commended the Winter Festival committee for a successful event and stated the Town looks forward to next year's event. He congratulated the RMNP on celebrating its 95th birthday today. Board of Trustees - January 26, 2010- Page 2 1. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Town Board Minutes dated January 12, 2010. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, January 7, 2010. 1. Frost Giant Road Closure - MacGregor Ave. between Elkhorn Ave. and Park Ln., January 31, 2010. 4. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes' December 15, 2009 (acknowledgement only). I r t 5. Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority 1Minutes iDecember 16, 2009 (acknowledgement only). It was moved and seconded (Levine/Miller) to aplirove the conserttagenda, and it passed unanimously. * 2. REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS: ' 4 A 1. GRANDSTAND PROJECT UPDATE. Deputy Town Administrator Richardson briefly r~Viewed the project and stated 33% of approved funds<have(been eÂ®ended+to date. The steel structure has not been delivered becallse of d delay in-receivitig the shop drawings. The contractor anticipates receiving .the steel sthlcture during the last week in March or fitst weekln Apriliwith a completion date still targeted for the first week in June. A final ~schedille would be available once the steel structure is delivered. EPURA hAs approved an additional $50,000 to complete the concession stbnd. Trl.MiBe Milldr stated the Ad Hoc Design Committee has ,beenjmpressed and appreciative bf the administration of the project by Deputy ~~,/Town Administrator-~Richhrdson and Public Works Director Zurn. 4. / 2. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR REPORT. \ â€¢\jnvited 4~the public.to'the ceremony and reception to officially transfer fire \~ services~ frorh the Town to the Estes Valley Fire Protection District on Jahuary'27, 5010 at ttie Dannels Fire Station. \Plattd'River.Power Authority has been and continues to conduct a survey in Estes ParK on power usage. â€¢ Upgrades would be added to the Board room to capture future meetings digitally and allow citizens to view the meetings on the internet. 3. LIQUOR ITEMS. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: NEW TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FILED BY MOUNTAIN MUNCHIES LLC dba MOUNTAIN MUNCHIES, 189 & 191 RIVERSIDE DRIVE. Mayor Pinkham opened the Public Hearing and reviewed the procedures. Town Clerk Williamson presented the application and confirmed the Town has not received any communications or evidence in support or opposition to the application, and required T. I.P.S. would be completed at the upcoming scheduled training. Comments were heard from Paul & Sally Whyard/Applicant. Mayor Pro Tem Levine reminded the applicant the Board takes all liquor licensing laws seriously and relies upon the licensee to be vigilant when serving and selling alcohol. Board of Trustees - January 26, 2010- Page 3 Lee and Sandy Lasson/adjacent property owners spoke in opposition to the granting of the liquor license stating the expansion of the business would affect the neighborhood negatively. There being no further testimony, Mayor Pinkham closed the Public Hearing. Stating the Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are for the granting of this liquor license, it was moved and seconded (BlackhursUHomeier) the Tavern Liquor License application filed by Mountain Munchies LLC dba MOUNTAIN MUNCHIES be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS. Items reviewed by Planning Commission or staff for Town Board Final Action. 1. ACTION ITEMS: A. Vacation Homes and Bed & Breakfast Amendments.to the Estes Valley Development Code and Municipal Code - 1Second Reading/Public Hearing. Mayor Pinkham reopehed the public hearing. Planner Chilcott stated the first reading of the code amendments werd heard on December 8, 2010 and if approved Would be considered by the"Larimer Board of County Commissioners on March 8, 2010. The Estes Valley Planning Commission (EVPC),approved the amendments on October 20,2009 that provides definitions of accommodation use, guest room, guest quarter, household living, and nightltrental in EVDC Chapter 13, and revisions to distinguish between B&Bs and >vacation home uses and the districts in which these uses are permitted. Trustee Miller questiohed allowinb vacation rentals in the R-1 zoning district because that distlict contains affordable housing. Planner Chilcott agreed the use could be removed as a permitted use in Table 4-1. *.L 7.: / David Habecker/Town citizen and accommodation business owner c6mmented that hotel owners are not in favor of vacation homes. He stated the Town should enforce all regulations related to these businesses and make sure the proper sales tax is collected and remitted. Mayor.Pinkham closed the public hearing. Town Clerk Williamson read Ordinance #02-10. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Miller) to approve Exhibit A with the removal of R-1 as a permitted use for vacation homes from Table 4-1. It was moved and seconded (Miller/Blackhurst) to approve Ordinance #02-10. The Board thanked staff and the EVPC for the over 3 years of work. B. Accessory Kitchen Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code - Public Hearing - Second Reading/Public Hearing. Mayor Pinkham reopened the public hearing. Planner Shirk reviewed the amendments that would allow a private residence to have a second kitchen in a single- family residence without creating a second dwelling unit. Trustee Miller questioned allowing second kitchens for homes in the R-1 zoning district. Director Joseph stated the valley contains one single- family subdivision in the R-1 zoning district and removing the use would not allow those homeowners the opportunity for a second kitchen. Trustee Blackhurst objected to the land use affidavit requirement; however, the amendments would legalize the existing second kitchens in the valley. Board of Trustees - January 26, 2010- Page 4 Paul Brown/Town citizen reviewed the definition of household living that does not require full access of all facilities to all parts of a dwelling unit, i.e. bedrooms, bathrooms, workroom, closets, etc., and stated the Â· proposed code language would be inconsistent with the definition and should be revised. He also stated opposition to the land use affidavit requirement. Mayor Pinkham closed the public hearing. Town Clerk Williamson read Ordinance #03-10. It was moved and seconded (Homeier/Miller) to approve Ordinance #03-10, and it passed unanimously. C. Wind Turbine Amendment to the Estes Valley Dpvelopment Code - First Reading/Public Hearing. Mayor Pinkham op*Aed the public hearing. Planner Shirk reviewed the amendments irdcomniended by the Estes Valley Planning Commission pertaining to Small Wind Energy Conversion Systems (small wind turbines). EVPC held 3. public hearings with comments ranging from banning the units'~ entirely~to allow the units anywhere in the valley. The probosed ''am@ndments address issues surrounding the location, noise< visual and other, potdntial impacts to adjoining properties. The probosed imendments would allow small wind systems in all residential zoning districtsi Aeight shall not exceed 30 feet from the highest point; setbatks shall be fivetimes the height; units would not be permitted on Jand designhted as a ridgeline protection area; comply with noise ordinances -Â·of the Town Eind County; lighting would be prohibited; all systems would be required t~maintain safe operation or be removed; units wduld be an accessory'use add would not be allowed on an undeveloped lot; building permit would'be'required; no more than one system per lot; micro-windsystems with Aswept area of 15 square feet or less w6uld be exempt, from setbackâ€žrequirements; and multiple micro systdms could beiinstalled with a cumulative aggregate swept area of 40 s4uare feet. 1 -- Trustee comments are 4;hlmarized: questioned the status of amending the building cdde iR bothÂ»i Town and the County to adopt Federal safety standards ~Â· for Wind turbines; verify electrical connections would be required to be buri@d; questioned allowing an unsafe unit to operate for 3 , months; a separateltandard should be developed for an unsafe unit; the ' proposed setback requirement would require a minimum of 2 acres of land virtually banning the units; questioned the rationale for regulating; and suggested a special review process for large wind turbine units. Those speaking against the proposed regulations included Frank Theis/County citizen, Jim Tawney/Town Citizen, Todd Plummer/Town citizen, Bill Darden/Town citizen, Tom Bergman/Town citizen, Dave RusldCounty citizen, Paul Brown/Town citizen and Bob Clements/Town citizen. They questioned the need for additional regulations for wind turbines. The proposed regulations would in most respects ban the larger units. The regulations are based on visual aesthetics and the current regulations in the land use code should be used to regulate the units. The EVPC should have given more consideration to the wind energy survey responses in which a large number of respondents do not think turbines should be banned. The proposed setback requirements exceed the County setback of 2 times the height and the staff recommendation of 3 times the height. A property owner should have the right to construct a unit on their property if the neighboring properties do not have a concern. Mr. Rusk requested the Town Board consider an increase in the 1 Board of Trustees - January 26, 2010- Page 5 cumulative aggregate swept area of 45 square feet for micro-wind units. Homeowners should be allowed to install renewable energy sources as a back up for when the grid fails. David Habecker/Town citizen stated the noise Ordinance is not adequate and voiced concern with the noise the units may make. The Mayor continued the public hearing to the February 23, 2010 meeting for a second reading. The Board discussed separating the micro units from the discussion of the larger units. 5. ACTION ITEMS: 1. GRANDSTAND PROJECT - MISCELLANEOUS FEES. Trustee Miller requested the item be reviewed at an upcoming Work Session. He stated concern with the miscellaneous fee items including landscaping, sound system and folding chairs. He stated theses are expenses above the construction cost of the project and have not been approved by the Board. He questioned whether or not it was appropriate to purchase chairs from a capital account. After further discussion, it was agreed to discusssthe item at the Study Session scheduled on February 23, 2010 prior to the â„¢Town Board meeting, with staff providing a brief statement as to the need for*each item. 2. ORDINANCE #04-10 ABOLISHING THE ESTES PARK URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY. On January 12, 2010 the Town electorate voted to approve the Initiated Ordinance #07-09 amending the Estes Park Municipal Code adding Section 2.90. One aspect of the new code language requires the abolishment of the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority (EPURA) consistent with all applicable Colorado Revised Statutes. EPURA 'may/be abolished pursuant to 31-25- 115(2) CASÂ«provided that adequate arrangements have been made for the paymeht of 'any outstanding indebtedness and other obligations, and the abolishment shall not be less than six months from the effective date of the ordinance passed by the municipality. To comply with the new code, the Town Boardlnust napprove Ordinance #04-10 abolishing the EPURA on July 26, 2010. Town ~ Clerk Williamson read Ordinance #04-10. After further discussion, it.was moved and seconded (Ericson/Blackhurst) to approve Ordinarke #04-10 with an emergency clause to abolish EPURA effective July 26, 2010, ahd it passed unanimously. -/ \F J 3. RESOLUTION #04-10 - OFFICIALLY SCHEDULING REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION -APRIL 6, 2010. Town Clerk Williamson reviewed Resolution #04-10 scheduling the regular Municipal Election for April 6, 2010 to election three Trustee positions currently held by Trustees Blackhurst, Eisenlauer and Homeier. The Resolution would also approve contracting with Larimer County to perform a mail ballot election at an approximate cost of $6,100. It was moved and seconded (Blackhurst/Miller) Resolution #04-10 and Intergovernmental Agreement with Larimer County be approved, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Pinkham adjourned the meeting at 10:23 p.m. William C. Pinkham, Mayor Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town o f Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 12, 2010 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the TOWN BOARD STUDY SESSION of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in Rooms 201/202/203 in said Town of Estes Park on the 12th day of January, 2010. Board: Mayor Pinkham, Mayor Pro Tem Levine, Trustees Blackhurst, Eisenlauer, Ericson, Homeier, and Miller Attending: Mayor Pinkham, Mayor Pro Tem Levine, Trustees Blackhurst, Eisenlauer, Ericson, Homeier, and Miller Also Attending: Town Administrator Halbumt, DeRuty Town Administrator Richardson, Town Attorney White,+Dir/Joseph, Dir. Kilsdonk, Mgr. Winslow, and Deputy Towntle?k Deats Absent None ///Â« /4 Mayor Pinkham called the meeting to order at 5*06 << /\.. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. C 0. 98/ Town Administrator Halburnt introduced two..issues' for discussion related to the Comprehensive Plan. First, to ,verify the TO*~ 0,Board's desire to review the Comprehensive Plan and, second,90 app@nt two thistaes to a subcommittee to include two members of the Estes Valley Pfanningjlommission (EVPC), Administrator Halburnt, and Community Development Dir. Jo~bh, to cifty qut th& rieview. After discussion the Trustees'~agreed *that..th<Plan -shduld be reviewed chapter by chapter to determineif the cohtent is curleAWnd pertinent or if updates are necessary, rather than to initiAtta full-b16,@ re-writ~ Â¥ the Plan. Mayor Pinkham appointed Trustees Homelet atid Ericson~to/the sub-cofhmittee, Dir, Joseph suggested a Town- appointed Estes VallettlanningfÂ¢Bmmissiohe} and a County-appointed Estes Valley Planning,commissiondÂ«rebretent tfikEVI*yon the subcommittee. Once formed, the subcommittee-will'tleveldp,Aimeeting schedule and after taking an initial look at the Plan,ame back td thelowh.Board and EVPC with an assessment of what areas of the Plattneed to be revisited*or re*iski 1 \ 4 ~~1 * 4, GRANDSTAND NAME AND NAMING RIGHTS. In 1968, the Town of Eates Park officially named the arena at the fairgrounds the "Granny May Arena" after ,Charles Everett May who was an integral part of the Estes Park communitÂ¢aAd.a Rdoftop Rodeo pioneer. Discussion was initiated as to whether the new grandstands,,which are currently under construction, should carry the same name is summarized: the Rooftop Rodeo Committee is in favor of keeping the name the same; the arena name could remain the same with a different name for the grandstands; important to maintain the historical connection; may be worthwhile to pursue naming rights for the grandstands through a broker but may be expensive process; naming rights could provide monies to help offset grandstand construction costs; grandstand could be named for donors, contributors, sponsors, or in honor of a fairground employee; and a contest could be utilized to generate community interest and involvement in the naming process. Mgr. Winslow will research any possible local interest in naming rights as well as how other entities approach naming their facilities. In addition, more information will be gathered related to the options and costs of utilizing a naming rights broker. CODE OF CONDUCT AND MUNICIPAL CODE CLARIFICATIONS. Chapter Two of the Municipal Code addresses the roles of the Mayor and Trustees. Mayor Pinkham stated that the Code loosely defines these roles and proposed a t RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town Board Study Session - January 12, 2010 - Page 2 committee be created to review this portion of the Municipal Code and make recommendations related to more clearly defining the responsibilities of these positions. The Mayor appointed Mayor Pro Tem Levine, Trustee Blackhurst, Town Administrator Halburnt, and Attorney White to the committee. He said Colorado Municipal League Executive Director Sam Mamet has provided examples of Mayor and Trustee job descriptions from other Colorado communities for the committee to refer to as they review Chapter Two of the Municipal Code, and invited all the Trustees to review the Code and provide input to the committee as well. The Mayor said he is hopeful that the result of the committee's work will be a clear, understandable document to provide for better government and assist current and new members of the Board of Trustees. The Mayor expects that the review and subsequent changes will be finalized no later than the end of March 2010. The Trustees also discussed creating a policy manual to outline topics such as adding an item to the meeting agenda and procedures to be followed during board meetings. p In addition, Mayor Pinkham voiced his desire to develop a*Code of Conduct for the Board. He proposed the Code of Conduct describe the basic' philosophy of the Board and also be part of a comprehensive training and education document utilized by current and newly elected Board members. TrusteesÂ°Eis@nlahe;*and Miller will work on this project. The Board also discussed the benefits'bf holding ah.illformational meeting for potential candidates for the Town Board anya training session forthewly elected and incumbent members of the Board. 2 4 t 1 MISCELLANEOUS. \41 0 1. Parking at the Estes Park Community Thrift Stdre:Â£ As a member of the Board of Adjustments (BOA), Mayor Ptod*m Levine<recused himself from the discussion and left the meeting at 6:03 P.Ir!~1:,#- Following the receipt of compiaihts dtiout the~vailability of parking at the Estes Park Community Thrift.Store on'HighwaÂ¢34*th'*Trudt@es requested background aboutthe p~p~ty---JDir. Jos&ph 'stafed ttie.itlrrent owners submitted a development*plati for the broperty in 4~93 at which time staff made the owners aware of issues related td the functionality of the parking. The owners chose not to change 'the. parking' cbnfiguratioh and to proceed with development as submitted. Afteba p6riod of.Jifne: the>owner's requested a variance to allow parkihg within the ,~25~ft. highway<setback. The BOA considered the parking issues baingbxperierked by the owner a self-imposed hardship and, therefore, /904dequate grolinds for h variance and denied the request. At the time, the ' i broperty ownerklid'not *peal the BOA's decision, which would be required to be heard in district cotlrt, andÂ«Brocedures do not provide for a re-hearing of the original.variance re~qdest. 11 1 j Parking,atdthe Jocation was not in compliance when the current tenant took possessidn Of,the>broperty. The Town received a complaint about the parking situation at tl:,Thrift Shop which was handled through Code Enforcement with resolution in October 2009. As a result of the property owner's actions to become compliant with the Code, many members of the Estes Park Community Thrift Store's volunteer work-force, as well as patrons of the store, are having difficulty finding parking places and/or walking up the hill to access the store. Mayor Pinkham and Trustee Eisenlauer will schedule a meeting with the Thrift Store manager to further discuss this matter. There being no further business, Mayor Pinkham adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Cynthia Deats, Deputy Town Clerk / Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 18, 2010 Minutes of a Special meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 18th day of January, 2010. Meeting called to order by Mayor Pinkham. Present: Mayor William C. Pinkham Trustees Eric Blackhurst Dorla Eisenlauer John Ericson Richard Homeier Chuck Levine Jerry Miller Also Present: Greg White, Town Attorney Jacquie Halburnt, Town Administrator Lowell Richardson, Deputy Town Administrator Kate Rusch, Public Information Officer Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Absent: None Mayor Pinkham called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 1. REQUEST TO ENTER EXECUTIVE SESSION: Trustee Blackhurst questioned the need for the Executive Session. Attorney White stated to discuss the.legaListsues related to the Initiated Ordinance and the ongoing 0 5: 4% ./ lawsuit. It was moved.and seconded (Eisenlauer/Miller) the Town Board enter into Executive SessioÂ©for a cohference with the Town Attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions regarding the Initiated Ordinance, underiC.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b), and it passed unanimously. Mayor Pinkham recessed the meeting to enter into Executive Session at 4:03 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 5:41 p.m. from Executive Session. The Board stated the voters have sent a clear message and it is the responsibility of the Board to implement the will of the people. It was moved and seconded (Homeier/Levine) the Town shall not pursue any legal challenges on the recently adopted Initiated Ordinance related to EPURA and staff shall move forward with the implementation of the Ordinance, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Pinkham adjourned the meeting at 4:48 p.m. William Pinkham, Mayor Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 21, 2010 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 21 st of January, 2010. Committee: Chair Eisenlauer, Trustees Homeier and Ericson Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Halburnt, Deputy Town Administrator Richardson, Chief Kufeld, and Recording Secretary Petrie Absent None Chair Eisenlauer called the meeting to order at 8:00 am PUBLIC COMMENT None. . I POLICE DEPARTMENT Recommendation to Town Board Estes Vallev Victim Advocates Contract _ The Estes Valley Victim Advocates receive funding annually from the Town of Estes Park for services rendered to crime victims who,ate.residents of Estes Park. The Police Department has reviewed the contract.bresentedlof 201,0 with Town Attorney White. The Committee recommends approval 6f the'2010 contract as presented at a cost of $7,920 from account #101-2100-421-22-98 budgeted to be included on the February 9, 2010 Town Board Consent Agenda. 11 Intergovernmental Agreement with Colorado State Universitv Periodically, Colorado State University (CSU) requests assistance from the Estes Park Police Depattment thwork security or direct traffic at highly-attended special events on campus property, specifically football games, in order to maintain order and ensure the safety of the attendees. Police officers are paid regular time and CSU pays the Town time and a:half to cover expenses. Previously, there has been no formal agreement in place between the two entities to provide police assistance. The Committee recommends approval of the IGA between the Police Department and CSU to provide mutual assistance for special events and emergencies to be included on the February 9, 2010 Town Board Consent Agenda. REPORTS Estes Vallev Victim Advocates Annual Report Mary Mesropian, Executive Director of Estes Valley Victim Advocates, gave an overview of the 2009 Annual Report. In 2009, Victim Advocates had a total of 489 contacts utilizing eight volunteer advocates. The Affordably Chic Fashion Show and Silent Auction raised over $5,000.00 for the organization and will become an annual fundraising event. Victim Advocates will continue its programs for the future, focusing on education and outreach to the community and schools. The proposed budget of $146,000.00 for 2010 will cover staff salaries; upkeep of the safehouse; purchase of household items, office supplies and equipment; and will provide victim services money. There being no further business, Chair Eisenlauer adjourned the meeting at 8:32 a.m. Sandra Petrie, Recording Secretary 4 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town o f Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 28, 2010 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held at Town Hall in said Town of Estes Park on the 28th day of January 2010. Committee: Chairman Blackhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Levine and Trustee Miller Attending: Chairman Blackhurst, Mayor Pro Tem Levine and Trustee Miller Also Attending: Town Administrator Halbumt, Deputy Town Administrator Richardson, Public Works Direptor. Zurn, Project Mgr. Sievers, and Deputy Town Clerk Deats Absent None Chairman Blackhurst called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. PUBLIC COMMENT. None PROSPECT AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION - PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS. As improvements to Prospect Avenue move forward, temporary and permanent easements are required from residents ' affected by the reconstruction. Cornerstone Engineering and staff have designed and draftdd the followihg easements: 1. Permanent Easement, Access, Utility, and Drainage Access Easement for Construction and Maintenance - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by 401 Elm LLC, 401 Elm Avenue. 2. Permanent Easement, Access, Utility, and Drainage Access Easement for Construction and Maintenance - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by 411 Elm LLC, 411> Elm Avenue. 3. Permanent Easement, Access, Utility and Drainage Access Easement for Construction and Maintenance - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by 408 Fir LLC, 408 Fir Avenue. 4. Perrnanent Easement, Construction and Maintenance of Underground Electric, Telephbne, Fiber Optics and Cable - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by Elley Family Partners, LLC, 880 Comanche Street. 5. Temporary Easement, Construction easement - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by 401 Elm LLC, 401 Elm Avenue. 6. Temporary Easement, Construction easement dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by 411 Elm LLC, 411 Elm Avenue. 7. Temporary Easement, Construction easement - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by 408 Fir LLC, 408 Fir Avenue. 8. Temporary Easement, Undergrounding of overhead utilities - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by Elley Family Partners, LLC, 830 Comanche Street. 9. Temporary Easement, Undergrounding of overhead utilities - dedicated to the Town of Estes Park by Elley Family Parlners, LLC, 880 Comanche Street. The Prospect Avenue reconstruction project, which will make safety improvements to the roadway, is going out to bid next week. Dir. Zurn stated that these are the final easements required for the project and commended the property owners for their cooperation. The Committee recommends approval of the permanent and temporary easements as outlined above. Dir. Zum also stated that a septic tank that is in violation of health department regulations was discovered on property owned by the hospital, and that he will be contacting the hospital to discuss the matter. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - January 28, 2010 - Page 2 REPORTS. Reports provided for informational purposes and made a part of the proceedings. â€¢ Drainage Master Plan: The Town's first storm drain study encompassed approximately 11% of its area and was completed in 1985, resulting in two large capital projects in the northeast quadrant in 1986-87. A second study, a Master Drainage Plan was completed in 2009, by RG Consulting Engineers of Denver, for Prospect Mountain Southeast and the Elm Road Industrial Area. These areas were studied due to frequent flooding, private property damage, and storm water quality concerns. The study identified the original, historical drainage which has changed due to development, identified problem areas, and water quality issues. The study makes recommendations to solve these issues and includes approximate costs associated with the solutions,which are $8,314,966 for proposed improvements within the Prospect Mountain southeast area quadrant and $1,529,893 within the Elm Road industrial area. Dir. Zum stated this is a planning document and a tool to be utilized for funding considerations. :, ' 3% â€¢ Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)Signal Conduit and Controller Upgrade: In Spring 2010, CDOT#is planning to upgrade the intersection of Moraine Avenue and Elkhorn Avenue.:,Pedestrian movement will be modified so that pedestrians cross with the traffid flow, vide@detection cameras will be installed, an interconnected coordination system will beÂ»utilized to allow CDOT to more accurately control the phases from Greeley, and new signal coordination will be implemented. CDOT has budgeted $250,000 for this projectlwith no cost to the Town. /. \ 9 ... â€¢ Prospect Avenue Bypass Reconstruction: .Thistproject is a priority on the Capital Improvement Plan with three years of funaing having been combined to improve the alignment and function of the . Stanley Avenue/Prospect Avenue intersection, replace and improve the storm drain'system, add a 6 ft. pedestrian sidewalk to the south side of the Foadway, prbvide intirsection improvements to five adjacent streets, and reduce on-street parking alond FiR Avenue. The project will go out to bid on.FdWFuary 1, 2010, with a bid opdning planned for February 18, 2010. Bid approval Gill betaken as an action item t6 the February 23, 2010, Town Board meeting. wConstrubti6n is scheduled for March 15, 2010 through May 27, 2010. In p'reparation fordoristruction, underground conduit is being installed along the length of the pioject:And is approximately 30% complete. TOUR OF THE PROSPECT AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. A tour of' the site, 4of, the:Ptoppect Avenue Reconstruction project was scheduled immkliately after the adjbumnieqtof the regular meeting. $ 1 \ h .4 1 There beihg ho further blisiness, Chairman Blackhurst adjourned the meeting at 9:17 a.nn. Cynthia Deats, Deputy Town Clerk TOWN oF ESTES I?Alit<L *PA' 7 Â·9:8*If 79 A',.721.=$&'<\ 3452Â¥23?32, V.â€ž42%42 6- u *, W iÂ» %:31 Town CIerk's Office Memo TO: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt From: Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk Date: February 4, 2010 RE: Renewal Application Filed By Everest Food Store LLC dba East Side Everest Food Store, 381 S. Saint Vrain Avenue Background: On November 14, 2009, an alcohol sales compliance check was conducted by the Liquor Enforcement Division at your business. Unfortunately an employee of the Food Store illegally sold alcohol to an underage person and/or did not ask for identification and sold the underage person alcohol. This is a violation of the State Liquor Code and has been handled by the State Liquor Enforcement Division. Attached is the Stipulation Agreement between the business and the State Liquor Enforcement Division outlining a seven (7) day suspension of the liquor license with two (2) days served and five (5) days held in abeyance. In lieu of an active suspension, the licensee has elected to pay a fine, and therefore, the two (2) suspension will be deemed automatically stayed. If further violations occur within a year of the stipulation, the licensee will serve all or any days of the suspension held in abeyance. The licensee completed T. I.P.S. training on April 10, 2006, a month after receiving his license. Budget: N/A Staff Recommendation: N/A Sample Motion: I move to approve/deny the renewal application for Everest Food Store LLC dba East Side Everest Food Store. Page 1 BEFORE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF COLORADO STIPULATION, AGREEMENT, AND ORDER IN THE MATTER OF: EVEREST FOOD STORE, L.L.C. D/B/A EAST SIDE EVEREST FOOD STORE 381 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN AVENUE Col---, ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LICENSE NO. 42-29783-0000 THIS AGREEMENT BETWEEN the State of Colorado, Liquor Enforcement Division ("Division") and Everest Food Storeâ€žL.L.C., d/b/a East Side Everest Food Store, 381 South Saint Vrain Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado 80517 ("Licensee") is offered for the purpose ofsettlement of the matters detailed in the Order to Show Cause, Notice of Hearing, and Forfeiture Action attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (hereinafter "Notice"). The above-name4 parties submit and agree as follows: 1. The facts and allegations contained in the Notice are true and accurate. 2. The Licensee agrees to a seven (71 day suspension of its 3.2% beer license as a penalty for its violation of the Colorado Liquor Code as set forth in paragraph 1 of this stipulation and agreement. Said suspension of Licensee's 3.2% beer license to take place as follows: A. License to be actively suspended for two (21 days from 12:01 am on February 5, 2010 until 11:59 p.m. on February 6, 2010. B. During any period of active license suspension, Licensee will post its premises in compliance with Regulation 47-600(F), 1 C.CA 203-2. C. Five (5) days of suspension to be held in abeyance for a period of one (1) year, from the date of approval of this agreement by the state licensing authority, pending no further violations of the Colorado Liquor Code during this period. 3. The Licensee petitions and the Division agrees that the Licensee shall be allowed to pay a fine in lieu of active suspension in accordance with 12-47-601(3), C.R.S. In this regard, the parties agree as follows: Stipulation, Agreement, and Order East Side Everest Food Store Greeley Office Page 2 A. That the public welfare and morals would not be impaired by permitting the Licensee to operate during the period set for suspension and that the payment ofthe fine will achieve the desired disciplinary purposes; and B. That the books and records of the Licensee are kept in such a manner that loss of sales ofalcohol beverages which the Licensee would have suffered had the suspension gone into effect, can be determined with reasonable accuracy therefrom; and C. That the Licensee has not had its license suspended or revoked, nor had any suspensions stayed by the payment of a fine, during the two (2) years immediately preceding the date of the complaint which has resulted in this stipulation and agreement. 4. The parties agree that the fine shall be the equivalent oftwenty percent (20%) ofthe Licensee's estimated gross revenues from the sales of alcohol beverages during a period of two days, except that the fine shall not be less than two hundred dollars ($200.00) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The parties agree thatthe average day's sales for the month of November 2009 shall be the appropriate measure of said estimated gross revenues. Based upon these records, the amount of the fine has been determined to be $200.00. 5. Payment ofthe fine pursuant to the provisions ofthis agreement shall be in the form of a certified check or a cashier's check made payable to the Colorado Department of Revenue. Said fine shall be paid to the Department of Revenue on or before January 29, 2010. 6. Upon the payment of the fine as agreed upon in paragraph 5, Licensee's two-day suspension as set forth in paragraph 2 of this stipulation and agreement shall be deemed automatically stayed. 7. If the Licensee fails to make payment in a timely manner as detailed in paragraph 5 of this stipulation and agreement, the full two-day suspension shall be served as detailed in paragraph 2. 8. The alcohol beverages that were sold or used in the violation described in the Notice are hereby forfeited. Stipulation, Agreement, and Order East Side Everest Food Store Greeley Office Page 3 If at any subsequent hearing or stipulation in lieu of hearing, the state licensing authority should find that the Licensee, during the aforesaid one-year period, violated any provision of the Colorado Beer or Liquor Codes, including all regulations thereunder, then the state licensing authority shall, in addition to any other penalty imposed, order Licensee to serve all or any days of suspension presently held in abeyance, pursuant to this agreement. This Stipulation, Agreement, and Order shall not be effective unless and until approved by the state licensing authority. -7- , An 1/0 11 , t / 'FJVV u'l ,1~-Â· (AU CL-Â».~- LEaurd K. Harris Navaraj Shrestha Director East Side Everest Food Store Liquor Enforcement Division 11 40% 01 / 11 110 Date Date APPROVED and ORDERED this _~~day of >7~4, v~_L~ 2010. Roxy Hpbet ~ Execpt(ve Director Department of Revenue State Licensing Authority BEFORE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF COLORADO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE OF HEARING, AND FORFEITURE ACTION IN THE MATTER OF: EVEREST FOOD STORE, L.L.C. D/B/A EAST SIDE EVEREST FOOD STORE 381 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN AVENUE ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 LICENSE NO. 42-29783-0000 WHEREAS, it has been made to appear to the State Licensing Authority, Executive Director, Department of Revenue, State of Colorado, that Everest Food Store, L.L.C., d/b/a East Side Everest Food Store, 381 South Saint Vrain Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado 80517 ("Licensee"), has violated the statutes or the regulations of the Department of Revenue governing its 3.2% beer license in the following particulars: I) Pursuant to Section 12-47-901(1)(a.5)(I), C.R.S., except as provided in Section 18-13-122, C.R.S., it is unlawful for any person to sell, serve, give away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of any alcohol beverage to or for any person under the age of twenty-one years. A) It is alleged that on November 14, 2009 the Licensee, through its employee/agent, Vijay M. Nakarmi, permitted the selling, serving, giving, or procuring of an alcohol beverage (Bud Light brand fermented malt beverage) to LG-09-103, a nineteen-year-old Liquor Enforcement Division underage purchaser. II) Pursuant to Section 12-47-907, C.R.S., there shall be no property rights of any kind in any alcohol beverages, vessels, appliances, fixtures, bars, furniture, implements, wagons, automobiles, trucks, vehicles, contrivances, or any other things or devices used or kept for the purposes o f violating any provisions of this article or article 46 0 f this title. A) It is alleged that on or about November 14, 2009, the Licensee used or kept on the licensed premises one (1) 12 oz. bottle of Bud Light brand fermented malt beverage for the purpose of violating the provision of article 47, as alleged in paragraph I of this notice. NOW THEREFORE, you are hereby ordered to appear before me to show cause why your said license should not be suspended or revoked as provided by law. A pre-hearing meeting with the Liquor Enforcement Division to discuss matters relating to this notice, including the setting of a mutually convenient hearing date, may be arranged upon your request. You should contact Supervising Investigator, David Ziemer at 970-356-3992 within ten (10) days of the date of this notice to arrange such a conference. If you fail to contact the Division within ten (10) days, a hearing date will be set without further notice to you, and you will then be notified by letter ofthat hearing date. You are entitled to have an attorney represent you at the hearing. If you should retain an attorney, you should do so well in advance of the hearing. Once a hearing date has been set, a postponement will not be granted except for good cause shown. If you should fail to appear at the scheduled time and place for the hearing, testimony will be taken in reference to the allegations, upon which evidence your license to operate under the terms of the Colorado Liquor or Beer code may be suspended or revoked. Please be further advised that if the State Licensing Authority does find you in violation of any of the above-cited section(s) of the Coloradb Liquor or Beer Code, the State Licensing Authority may consider, in selecting the sanction to be imposed against you, any mitigating or aggravating factors, any prior violations of the Colorado Liquor or Beer Code, as well as any sanctions previously imposed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, Notice of Hearing, and Forfeiture Action shall be mailed or delivered to the above-mentioned Licensee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have here unto set my hand and seal of my office this 78 day of December, 2009. >44 4/ Cj Roxy/Iutfer g Executive Director Department o f Revenue State Licensing Authority ME TOWN OF ESTES PAR~ Memo W TO: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt From: Robert Joseph, Director, Community Development Department Date: February 9, 2010 RE: ORDINANCE #05-10, Amendments to the Wildlife Code Amendments approved with Ordinance #08-09 to the Estes Valley Development Code - Public Hearing. Background: The Town Board approved Draft #9 of the Wildlife Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code on September 22, 2009. This draft was forwarded to the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners and reviewed at a public hearing held in Estes Park on November 9,2009. At the Board of Commissioner's hearing, members of the public requested that EVDC Section 7.8.F. 1 retain the requirement for applicants to prepare wildlife conservation plans for sites containing raptor nests due to the sensitivity of raptors to habitat disturbance. At this hearing, Larry Rogstad and Rick Spowart with the Colorado Division of Wildlife also stated their concern about the effects of construction on raptors and the sensitivity of raptors to habitat disturbance. Based on this public comment, the Commissioners recommended that the Development Code retain the ability to require wildlife conservation plans for sites containing raptor nests. Draft #9 had removed this requirement. The Commissioners also recommended that staff retain the ability to determine whether a consultant is qualified to prepare a wildlife conservation plan. Commissioners expressed concern that a developer could incur additional expenses if this provision was removed from the Development Code and a developer moved forward with a wildlife conservation plan prepared by an unqualified consultant. For clarity, staff also revised Section 7.8.F.3 Review Determination, replacing the term "wildlife studies and mitigation plans" with "wildlife conservation plans" in subsection b. The term "wildlife conservation plan" is used throughout Section 7.8., while subsection b contained the only reference to the term "wildlife studies and mitigation plans." Page 1 ./bill Community.D_exelopment Budget: N/A Countv Commission Recommendation: To allow for input from the Town Board regarding raptor nest sites and consultant approval, the Board of County Commissioners continued consideration of the wildlife code amendments to a 6:30 p.m., March 8, 2010 public hearing in the Estes Park Town Board Room. Staff has prepared the attached Draft #11 for Town Board review, which includes the revisions discussed by the County Commissioners. Sample Motion: The Town Board moves to approve/disapprove the Wildlife Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code as presented. If approved, the Amendments will be executed by the Mayor and forwarded to the Larimer Board of County Commissioners for approval and execution. Page 2 ~ Amendments to the ~!5C~ Estes Valley Development Code Habitat and Wildlife Estes Park Community Development Department ~I==0 Town Hall, 170 MacGregor Avenue --l-- - PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com TOWN BOARD MEETING DATE: February 9, 2010 TITLE: Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code REQUEST: To make a number of revisions to the habitat and wildlife protection regulations. LOCATION: Estes Valley, inclusive of the Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT: Estes Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph and Alison Chilcott APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code ORGANIZATION: 1. Text to be replaced delineated with strikethrough (abc do fghi jk Imn op qrstuv w xyz). 2. New text delineated with underline (abc de fahi ik Imn op qrstuv w xvz). 3. Revisions have been organized sequ-entially by_*apter and section. ,4.-Revisions made since-Town_Board's_review_of_Draft_9_on_September_22,_2009_ard hjghlighted in yellowl 1 Wildlife and Habitat Code Revisions - Draft #11 for FebrOary 9, 2010 Town Board Review Â§ 7.8 WILDLIFE HABITAT PROTECTION A. Purpose. To maintain anâ‚¬1-enhanGe the diversity of wildlife species and habitat that occur in the Estes Valley, and to plan and design land uses to be harmonious with wildlife habitat and the species tMat depend on this habitat for the economic, recreational and environmental benefit of the residents of and visitors to the Estes Valley. B. Applicability. This Section shall apply to all applications for review of development plans, subdivision plats, planned unit developments, special review uses and rezonings. This Section shall not apply to development on lots that were approved for single-family residential use prior to the effective date of this Code. C. Exemptions. The procedures and regulations contained in this Section shall not apply to: 1. ' Agricultural activities such as soil preparation, irrigation, planting, harvesting, grazing and farm ponds; 2. Maintenance and repair of existing public roads, utilities and other public facilities within an existing right-of-why or easement; 3. Maintenance and repair of flood control structures and activities in response to a flood emergency; 4. Maintenance and repair of existing residential or nonrbsidential structures; or 5. Wildlife habitat onhancomont and rostoration aActivities undertaken pursuant to a wildlife conservation plan approved under this Section. D. Other Regulations. This Section of the Code does not repeal or supersede any existing federal, state or local laws, easements, covenants or deed restrictions pertaining to wildlife. When this Section imposes a higher or more restrictive standard, this Section shall apply. E. Wildlife Habitat Data Base. The following sources shall be used to idAntify important wildlife habitat areas for purposes of review under this Section: 1. Wildlife Habitat map (dated December 1996), as set forth in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time 2. Colorado Division of Wildlife habitat maps for Larimer County, as amended from time to time. 3. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Maps dated December 1996, or as amended from time to time. 4. Other information and maps as Staff or the Estes Valley Planning Commission may from time to time identify in cooperation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife, such as wildlife maps produced specifically for the Estes Valley. Said maps shall be applicable only following adoption of an amendment to this Code. 2 Wildlife and Habitat Code Revisions - Draft #11 for February 9, 2010 Town Board Review 5. Wildlife habitat information required by this Section is intended for general planning purposes. Obvious errors or omissions may be corrected by the Staff a#er consultation with tho Division of Wildlife. F. Review Procedures. The following procedures shall apply to all applications for development: A= 1 Application. The Applicant shall submit a development plan, subdivision plat or sketch plan, as applicable, depicting the general location of the property, location of structures on the site, prominent natural areas such as streams and wetlands, and other features that Staff may require for review pursuant to this Section. A Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be submitted for sites containing: a. An endangered or threatened species, b. Bia Horn sheep or Big Horn sheep habitat, c. Riparian areas adiacent to rivers and streams, and wetlands identified on the maps set forth in Appendix A of this Code; or &--Raptor nest sites.1 2= 2: Preliminary Review. Staff shall refer the submitted plan or plat to the Colorado Division of Wildlife for review. Applicants aro also advicod to moet with tho Division of Wildlifo and othor agoncies as dotorminod appropriato by Staff to ensuro complianco with tho roquircments of this Section. Applicants are advised to consult with the Colorado Division of Wildlife and other agencies responsible for regulation of wildlife and habitat, such as the US Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior-Rocky Mountain National Park, US Forest Service, and Colorado Natural Heritage Program. These agencies mav maintain maps and databases that can aid in the site-specific confirmation of the presence or absence of wildlife and habitat on a specific site. 3. DOM/ RoWow. For applications referred to it, tho Division of Wildlifo will dotormine whethor tho proposal will rosult in significant adverse impact on wildlife or wildlife habitat only if tho dovclopment advorcoly impacts tho following: a. An ondangorod or thrcatenod cpocioc, b. A calving, lambing or fawning aroa, c. Big Horn shoop or Big Horn choop habitat, 2[ d. Rapts+Re*&*ereÂ¥ e. Riparian aroas and wetlands. 4 1 Review Determination. Bacod on recommendations from tho Division of Wildlife, the Staff will dotormino whothor tho Applicant must cubmit a wildlifo concorvation plan prior to approval of any dovolopmont application. Tho coneorvation plan should be submittod to tho Division of Wildlife for rovicw and rocommondation as to whether tho plan adoquatoly addroccos tho advorso impacts idontifiod by tho Division of Wildlifo pursuant to subsoction F.3 above. (Soo Â§7.8.H below.) a. The Review and Decision-Making Bodies shall issue a finding as to whether the application, including the wildlife conservation plan, complies with the requirements of this Section. 3 Wildlife and Habitat Code Revisions - Draft #11 for February 9, 2010 Town Board Review b. MVildlife conservation plans Wildlifo ctudics and mitigation pland found to be adequate bv the Decision-Making Bodv shall become binding upon the Applicant. c. Applications that do not comply with Section 7.8 of this code shall be denied. 5. 1.Waivers. Staff may waive or approve minor modifications.of any development standard or review criteria contained in this Section upon a finding that such waiver or modification: a. Is consistent with the stated purposes of this Section; b. Will have no significant adverse impacts on wildlife species or habitat; c. Any potential adverse impacts will be mitigated or offset to the maximum extent d. practicable; and e. Application of the standard or criteria is not warranted based on the location of the development, the absence of a particular species on the site or other relevant factors. G. Review Standards. The following review standards shall apply to all development applications as specified, unless Staff determines that a specific standard may be waived pursuant to subsection F.5. above. It is the intent of this Section that these standards be applied in a flexible fashion to protect wildlife habitat and wildlife species in a cost-effective fashion. 1. Review Standards. Â· a. Buffers. All development subiect to a Wildlife conservation plan shall provide a setback from any identified - important wildlife habitat area, ac specified by tho Division of Wildlifo, to tho maximum oxtent foaciblo in accordance with anv recommendations in the wildlife conservation plan. b. Non-Native Vegetation. There shall be no introduction of plant species that are not on the approved landscaping list in Appendix C on any site containing any important wildlife habitat area. To the maximum extent feasible, existing herbaceous and woody cover on the site shall be maintained and removal of native vegetation shall be minimized. c. Fencing. (1) No fencing on a site containing important wildlife habitat shall exceed forty (40) inches in height, except to the extent that such fencing is* approved by Staff to confine permitted domestic animals or to protect permitted ornamental landscaping or gardens. (2) Fences higher than forty (40) inches may be allowed if adequate openings are provided for the passage of deer, elk or other identified wildlife. These openings shall be at least six (6) feet wide and spaced a maximum of fifty (50) feet apart along continuous fence lines exceeding this length. (3) No fencing using barbed wire shall be allowed. (4) The type of fencing (materials, opacity, etc.) shall be determined by Staff or the Decision-Making Body as appropriate for the wildlife species on the site based on advice from tho Colorado Division of Wildlifo. 4 Wildlife and Habitat Code Revisions - Draft #11 for February 9, 2010 Town Board Review d. Exterior Lighting. Use of exterior lighting shall be minimized in areas of important wildlife habitat, and lighting shall be designed so that it does not spill over or onto such critical habitat. See also Â§7.9 below. e. Refuse Disposal. Developments on sites containing important wildlife habitat, such as black bear, must use approved animal-proof refuse disposal containers. With Division of Wildlife approval, refuse disposal containers and enclosures may be electrified. f. Domestic Animals. Development applications for property that includes important wildlife habitat must include a plan with specified enforcement measures for the control of domestic animals and household pets. The plan must include provisions to prevent the harassment, disturbance and killing of wildlife and to prevent the destruction of important wildlife habitat. H. Wildlife Conservation Plans. 1. Plan Preparation. A wildlife conservation plan required by this Section shall be prepared for the Applicant, at the Applicant's expense, under the responsible direction of a qualified person who has demonstrated expertise in the field SFid-is hcceptabletothe-Staffl[Note: Existing_code_language_would.be retained; Draft.#4 bmepsed-striking this-language] 2. P/an Content. Any wildlife conservation plan required to be prepared pursuant to this Section shall include the following information at a minimum. Specific requirements may be waived by Staff due to the location of the development, the previous use of the site, the size and potential impact of the development, the absence of particular species on a site, the prohibition of a reasonable use of the site and other relevant factors. a. A description of the ownership, location, type, size and other attributes of the wildlife habitat on the site. b. A description of the populations of wildlife species that inhabit or use the site, including a qualitative description of their spatial distribution and abundance. c. An analysis of the potential adverse impacts of the proposed development on wildlife and wildlife habitat on or off site. d. A list of proposed mitigation measures and an analysis of the probability of success of such measures. e. A plan for implementation, maintenance and monitoring of mitigation measures. f. A plan for any relevant enhancement or restoration measures. g. A demonstration of fiscal, administrative and technical competence of the Applicant or other relevant entity to successfully execute the plan. 5 Wildlife and Habitat Code Revisions - Draft #11 for February 9, 2010 Town Board Review ORDINANCE NO. 05-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 7.8 WILDLIFE HABITAT PROTECTION AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended an amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code, Section 7.8 Wildlife Habitat Protection; and WHEREAS, said amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code are set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town that the amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Section 7.8 Wildlife Habitat Protection set forth on Exhibit "A" and recommended for approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: The Estes Valley Development Code shall be amended as more fully set forth on Exhibit "A". Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS 9â„¢ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2010 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2010, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Jackie Williamson, Town Clerk EXHIBIT A Â§ 7.8 WILDLIFE HABITAT PROTECTION A. Purpose. To maintain the diversity of wildlife species and habitat that occur in the Estes Valley, and to plan and design land uses to be harmonious with wildlife habitat and the species that depend on this habitat for the economic, recreational and environmental benefit of the residents of and visitors to the Estes Valley. B. Applicability. This Section shall apply to all applications for review of development plans, subdivision plats, planned unit developments, special review uses and rezonings. This Section shall not apply to development on lots that were approved for single-family residential use prior to the effective date of this Code. C. Exemptions. The procedures and regulations contained in this Section shall not apply to: 1. Agricultural activities such as soil preparation, irrigation, planting, harvesting, grazing and farm ponds; 2. Maintenance and repair of existing public roads, utilities and other public facilities within an existing right-of-way or easement; 3. Maintenance and repair of flood control structures and activities in response to a flood emergency; 4. Maintenance and repair of existing residential or nonresidential structures; or 5. Activities undertaken pursuant to a wildlife conservation plan approved under this Section. D. Other Regulations. This Section of the Code does not repeal or supersede any existing federal, state or local laws, easements, covenants or deed restrictions pertaining to wildlife. When this Section imposes a higher or more restrictive standard, this Section shall apply. E. Wildlife Habitat Data Base. The following sources shall be used to identify important wildlife habitat areas for purposes of review under this Section: 1. Wildlife Habitat map (dated December 1996), as set forth in the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time 2. Colorado Division of Wildlife habitat maps for Larimer County, as amended from time to time. 3. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Maps dated December 1996, or as amended from time to time. 4. Other information and maps as Staff or the Estes Valley Planning Commission may from time to time identify in cooperation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife, such as wildlife maps produced specifically for the Estes Valley. Said maps shall be applicable only following adoption of an amendment to this Code. Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT A 5. Wildlife habitat information required by this Section is intended for general planning purposes. Obvious errors or omissions may be corrected by the Staff. F. Review Procedures. The following procedures shall apply to all applications for development: + 1. Application. The Applicant shall submit a development plan, subdivision plat or sketch plan, as applicable, depicting the general location ofthe property, location of structures on the site, prominent natural areas such as streams and wetlands, and other features that Staff may require for review pursuant to this Section. A Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be submitted for sites containing: a. An endangered or threatened species, b. Big Horn sheep or Big Horn sheep habitat, c. Riparian areas adjacant to rivers and streams, and wetlands identified on the maps set forth in Appendix A of this Code; or d. Raptor nest sites. 2. Preliminary Review. Staff shall refer the submitted plan or plat to the Colorado Division of Wildlife for review. Applicants are advised to consult with the Colorado Division of Wildlife and other agencies responsible for regulation of wildlife and habitat, such as the US Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior-Rocky Mountain National Park, US Forest Service, and Colorado Natural Heritage Program. These agencies may maintain maps and databases that cari aid in the site-specific confirmation of the presence or absence of wildlife and habitat on a specific site. 1 3. Review Determination. a. The Review and Decision-Making Bodies shall issue a finding As to whether the application, including the wildlife conservation plan, complies with the requirements of this Section. b. Wildlife conservation plans found to be adequate by the Decision-Making Body ' shall become binding upon the Applicant. c. Applications that do not comply with Section 7.8 of this code shall be denied. 4.Waivers. Staff may waive or approve minor modifications of any development standard or review criteria contained in this Section upon a finding that such waiver or modification: a. Is consistent with the stated purposes of this Section; b. Will have no significant adverse impacts on wildlife species or habitat; c. Any potential adverse impacts will be mitigated or offset to the maximum extent practicable; and d. Application of the standard or criteria is not warranted based on the location of the development, the absence of a particular species on the site or other relevant factors. Page 2 of 4 EXHIBIT A G. Review Standards. The following review standards shall apply to all development applications as specified, unless Staff determines that a specific standard may be waived pursuant to subsection F.5. above. It is the intent of this Section that these standards be applied in a flexible fashion to protect wildlife habitat and wildlife species in a cost-effective fashion. 1. Review Standards. a. Buffers. All development subject to a wildlife conservation plan shall provide a setback from any identified important wildlife habitat area, in accordance with any recommendations in the wildlife conservation plan. b. Non-Native Vegetation. There shall be no introduction of plant species that are not on the approved landscaping list in Appendix C on any site containing any important wildlife habitat area. To the maximum extent feasible, existing herbaceous and woody cover on the site shall be maintained and removal of native vegetation shall be minimized. c. Fencing. (1) No fencing on a site containing important wildlife habitat shall exceed forty (40) inches in height, except to the extent that such fencing is approved by Staff to confine permitted domestic animals or to protect permitted ornamental landscaping or gardens. (2) Fences higher than forty (40) inches may be allowed if adequate openings are provided for the passage of deer, elk or other identified wildlife. These openings shall be at least six (6) feet wide and spaced a maximum of fifty (50) feet apart along continuous fence lines exceeding this length. (3) No fencing using barbed wire shall be allowed. (4) The type of fencing (materials, opacity, etc.) shall be determined by Staff or the Decision-Making Body as appropriate for the wildlife species on the site. d. Exterior Lighting. Use of exterior lighting shall be minimized in areas of important wildlife habitat, and lighting shall be designed so that it does not spill over or onto such critical habitat. See also Â§7.9 below. e. Refuse Disposal. Developments on sites containing important wildlife habitat, such as black bear, must use approved animal-proof refuse disposal containers. With Division of Wildlife approval, refuse disposal containers and enclosures may be electrified. f. Domestic Animals. Development applications for property that includes important wildlife habitat must include a plan with specified enforcement measures for the control of domestic animals and household pets. The plan must include provisions to prevent the harassment, disturbance and killing of wildlife and to prevent the destruction of important wildlife habitat. Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT A H. Wildlife Conservation Plans. 1. Plan Preparation. A wildlife conservation plan required by' this Section shall be prepared for the Applicant, at the Applicant's expense, under the responsible direction of a qualified person who has demonstrated expertise in the field and is acceptable to Staff. [Note: Existing code language would be retained; Draft #9 proposed striking this language] 2. P/an Content. Any wildlife conservation plan required to be prepared pursuant to this Section shall include the following information at a minimum. Specific requirements may be waived by Staff due to the location of the development, the previous use of the site, the size and potential impact of the development, the absence of particular species on a site, the .prohibition of a reasonable use of the site and other relevant factors. 7 a. A description of the ownership, location, type, size and other attributes of the wildlife habitat on the site. b. A description of the populations of wildlife species that inhabit or use the site, including a qualitative description of their spatial distribution and abundance. c. An analysis of the potential adverse impacts of the proposed development on wildlife and wildlife habitat on or off site. d. A list of proposed mitigation measures and an analysis of the probability of success of such measures. e. A plan for implementation, maintenance and monitoring of mitigation measures. f. A plan for any relevant ephancemerIt or restoration measures. g. A demonstration of fiscal, administrative and technical competence of the Applicant or other relevant entity to successfully execute the plan. Page 4 of 4 FOR PUBLIC RECORD February 9, 2010 Sandy Osterman 1735 Red Tail Hawk Dr. Estes Park Good evening Mayor Pinkham and Trustees.. I wish to address my concern that the Raptor nest requirement as a trigger for a Wildlife Conservation Plan remain a part of Section 7.8. Wildlife Habitat Protection of the Estes Valley Development Code. There are extensive research studies providing information concerning Raptor nesting and habitats. I have accessed information from Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado Dept. of Wildlife, area authors and experts and various research from groups and individuals throughout Colorado and the United States. This is just the beginning of what one can learn about the importance of the Raptors. The Raptors that inhabit the Estes Valley are species of Eagles, Falcons, Hawks, and Owls. There are at least 22 species that nest within the Valley. Two Raptors, the American Peregrine Falcon and the Bald Eagle are on the Colorado Endangered, Threatened an Species of Concern list as State Special Concern which is not a statutory category- last updated 6-12-09. Human disturbance is stated as the most significant factor affecting Raptors and their nesting behaviors and existence. Buffer zones are recommended to avoid disturbance from development, human recreation and noise. Results from disturbance will vary. Raptors will abandon nests, young may be neglected leading to death, or forcing adults offnests, exposing eggs or chicks to the environment or to predators. There are a number of studies that define the appropriate space to avoid disturbance, such as studies from Boulder Open Space and Colorado Dept. of Wildlife. It is necessary that nests be identified, as not all raptors build stick nests and various raptors will reuse nests, build more than they will use and other species may use another Raptors' previous nests. Raptors can be primary or secondary nesters. Primary are those who build their own nest and secondary are ones who will use one previous built by another Raptor or bird. We even have a Bald Eagle who nest in the area North of Lake Estes. Rocky Mountain National Park closes areas of Lumpy Ridge and Sheep Mountain during nesting periods of 4 species of Raptors. The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act Section 7 (1) prohibits the destruction of bird nests that belong to a species that is wild by nature. Federal Laws , such as the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and State Laws do exist and need to be enforced. Experts agree that along with protecting the nesting sites, the protection of the habitat near the sites is of up most importance. If necessary food and water sources disappear so will the nesting behavior of the Raptors. A documentation appears that there is a relationship with the amount of food available to the female during egg laying, the more food, the more eggs laid, and of course, less food available to her the less eggs. This also has an effect on the nestlings. A nestling who is older, thus larger, will get the available food and the smaller, younger will not, resulting with that nestling unable to survive. Raptors are at the top of the food chain or food web (whichever term you use) and provide a healthy ecosystem. One expert with whom I had a conversation told me we need to recognize that there are more prey than predator Without the Raptors possessing the role as a predator on rodents, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians there would not be a balance of the food chain, food web. Various communities throughout Colorado are purchasing land as protected Open Space to provide positive Raptor habitat. The National Parks have Jr. Ranger Programs and Rocky has a program specialized for this Park. This past summer I was a volunteer and one of my responsibilities at Beaver Meadows Visitor Center was reviewing the Jr. Ranger books and interacting with the children and then awarding them their badges. Children around the U. S. and the world understand the importance of protecting the wildlife and their part of the food chain, food web. I also volunteer as an Ambassador at the Estes Park Visitor Center and about 85% of the questions asked of me are about wildlife viewing or wildlife behavior. I ask that you vote to leave the five categories as they are listed in the previous section of 7.8 We need to protect an environment that sustains the wildlife of the Estes Valley. Thank You. TOWN oF ESTES PARI<L FINANCE Memo To: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt From: Steve McFarland - Finance Officer Date: RE: Re-appropriation of 2009 encumbered funds into 2010 Budget Background: Certain Town departments have entered into contracts for goods and/or services that were not fulfilled by year-end December 31, 2009. When this occurs, it becomes necessary to "roll ovef' expenditures from one year to the next, because in governmental accounting, expenditures are not recognized until they are incurred/received. In essence, the budgeted amounts of the rollovers are lifted from the current budget year and placed into the next budget year. Fund balance is not affected - the expenditures are merely moved. It is staffs intention to keep rollovers to a minimum, but projects are often affected by weather, and by availability of producUcontractor. Budget: With the recession taking a bite out of revenues, it became critical in 2009 that staff manage their expenditures judiciously - and staff was successful. For example, the original 2009 budget had $11,869,000 in expenditures; the projected 2009 "actual" are closer to $11,230,000 - a $639,000 reduction. This more than compensated for the drop off in revenues. The original General Fund budget called for a $773,057 reduction in General Fund balance; "actual" forecast the reduction will be around $730,000 - some $40,000+ better than the original budget. Staff recognizes the economic situation facing our community, State and Nation, and seeks to increase fund balances where prudent. At the same time, staff endeavors to utilize funds to the long-term strategic advantage of the Town. The following reports the evolution of the 2009 financial picture for the General Fund. Page 1 TOWN or ESTES PARKV FINANCE Memo 2009 PERFORMANCE Original Revised Estimated Budget Budget Actual Beg Fund Bal $4,631,244 $4,631,244 $4,631,244 Revenues 11,096,020 10,668,315 10,501,403 Expenditures 11,869,077 11,578,111 11,230,466 Net (773,057) (909,796) (729,063) End Fund Bal $3,858,187 $3,721,448 $3,902,181 % 33% 32% 35% Attached is the list of those encumbrances that remain outstanding at the end of 2009. There are 44 rollover items totaling $3,143,128. As a frame of reference, there were 55 rollovers for 2008-09, totaling $5,802,400. As was the case last year, there are several "big ticket" items that comprise the bulk of the rollovers. Included are: 1. MPEC/Grandstands-related P.O.s (26564, 26572, 26751) totaling $1,194,313. 2. MLWTP-related P.O.s (24086,24440,26548,26550,26587) totaling $1,003,621. 3. Infrastructure-related P.O.s (25494,26242,26446,26362,26449,26505,26740) totaling $636,613. 4. Vehicle replacement - related P.O.s (26259,26357) totaling $152,619. These four areas account for 95% of the rollover requests. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed 2009 rollovers into the 2010 budget. Sample Motion: I move to approve the rollovers of the unspent 2009 itemized budget items into the 2010 budget Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 05-10 A RESOLUTION RE-APPROPRIATING FUNDS ENCUMBERED IN THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK'S 2009 BUDGET TO THE 2010 BUDGET YEAR WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park's accounting system incorporates a purchase order system that encumbers the budget appropriation when commitments for the purchase of goods or services are made; and WHEREAS, encumbrances that were not liquidated in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, are reserved from the ending fund balances; and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park intends to appropriate funds in the budget for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, to satisfy the commitments for the outstanding encumbrances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THAT: I. The following 2010 budgets are increased for appropriations for outstanding 2009 budget encumbrances. 2009 2010 2010 2010 ENCUMBRANCE O&M TRANSFERS REVISED FUND (PO Rollovers) EXPENSES OUT BUDGET General $557,163.21 $8,293,324.00 $2,908,000.00 $11,758,487.21 Community Reinvestment 1,196,257.13 2,000,000.00 0.00 3,196,257.13 Conservation Trust 8,779.78 63,000.00 0.00 71,779.78 Larimer Cty Open Space 73,827.84 322,445.00 0.00 396,272.84 Light & Power 90,675.41 12,924,830.00 998,897.00 14,014,402.41 Water 1,039,755.92 3,319,127.00 116,265.00 4,475,147.92 IT 24,049.08 450,791.00 0.00 474,840.08 Vehicle Replacement 152,619.32 370,500.00 0.00 523,119.32 $3,143,127.69 $27,744,017.00 $4,023,162.00 $34,910,306.69 11. The ending fund balance from the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, will be the source of funds for the budget amendments. ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 2010. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 40 > B m to CZ B 2 8 8 8 8 NO C,f 8 8 8 :288 Ir,88*888 88*Z 875:88 OLDmoo * *wma ma #m,wa 51Â§30 *ME* 691881 g *64 -*44 - h.rN.LA Clmol 8. 1-1:8 0'ry'C 8888888:888888828W888988884888888888888888888 000088900%6000*08685#:RM@RS#8Â°Â°68Â°08Â°@MÂ°Â°881Â° 2 3 Â°Â° q r m - Oq te Ul '4 m uÂ·, ..,~ N r., .4 4 - &Dm Cl CIr, LOU-161000 5 2 Ch 12 C 16 e Â·0 * 2 2 : 0 > C 0. U -U~ 1- 51 53 2 /33 NINNNINNAI 26259 Altec (2009 Dodge 5500 x4) 118,489.00 118,489.00 34,130.32 ZE-6I9'ZSI 80-6*0'VE Z6'SSL'650'I It'*SL9'06 t8'LZ8'EL 8L 6LL'8 EI'LSZ'96['I SO'I88'SI Â£6'LIE'58* 00'ZES'DZ IZ'6IS'*I 00'S90'II 20'848'S IE'â‚¬9I'LSS 80'6*0'VE 80'690'*Z (JaA.laS VlvS/SVS Mnld 1014 99 09I 101ueilo.Id dH 8) dH Â£559Z 1700 2100 2400 s3~~ 5200 204 211 220 LIGHT & 503 Â£8'858'0* LS-969'9 Â£5'969'9 (dl/A 1 06692 SS'ILE'E (spue,spuejg )ped AelueiS~~sejald Ope 0!tod 69S9Z 59*OVE'99 (cl.uvnw) Jelea4 IleAA.,!els ale,oia,) nio Â£8592 ZE'*65 (538 !LUSUen IBAa I alqigaulqns) AlddnS 41! S6S9Z 23444 RG Consulting (waterline repl projects for BoR) 3,949.94 3,949.94 24086 HDR Engineering (MLWTP) 8,403.14 8,403.14 881,421.80 881,421.80 2~~~ RGConsulti~-CIer design standards 8/14/08 UC mtg) 4,170.00 4,170.00 502 26362 A-1 Excavating (UG conduit Prospect/Moccasin) 86,332.4 86,332.45 96'ZtE't (519 IdaJ ld) 1100 IZS9Z SCRIPTION GENERAL TOTAL Building Police Engineering Parks CRF CTF LCOS 26132 Winston Assoc (Bond Park master plan) 8,779.78 8,779.78 26219 Atkins Inc (riverside/rockwell/weist repair) 1,125.00 26242 Cornerstone concrete (FR Trail - ARRA project) 72,702.84 25389 David Evans & Assoc. (transit pkng lot study) 4,917.85 25475 Van Horn Engineering (Stanley Prk transp Hub/Drain rvw) 398.00 00Â·ss.'s (apSJAbl - lee~J eplu~JiedeJ~t,und)l:ueutdin 8Z*I*6'06I 8Z'It76'06I 00'0Â£8't 00'0L8 (spa 01 4'NUAJ Jiede,) ou! suplw SO'9SL'I (pe)!OAU! - dinbe 'sloo; 'sleAolls) Dul peuoal I8S9Z 2009-10 ENCUMBRANCE LIST - PO Rollovers 25494 Cornerstone (prospect ave design & cm) 19,210.00 26269 Borstad consulting (micr 432.10 432.10 26360 Envirotech (ice slicer) 7,308.43 7,308.43 0*'9+0'9E (8/0 le,Â£ AMH ')11 5113- qeqai 018.t juB)S=:~13 II,9 00 LEE'Z d/siepajew) uosino) 6 00'*86'Â£66 (lunOU,le RAOIOJ d I.LS JO:[ Japlolleoeid @UO;SJaU-10) ODL9Z 26385 Felsburg, Holt, Ullevig (Impact Fee Study) 20,000.00 00'ZES't, Ou! JOIN-)113 Aa,uns - !0Jd 1003) Supeau!9u3 UJOH ueA 26402 Axess (phone system - conference o ) 869.00 IE'0S9'* IZ-OS9 (UORe;q.OAA) 112(] 00'00 517 Nululell lualupedeo 00!lod 0IS9Z 00*00Â£'I (gase, E Â·1!edel) Ja>Isel ZS592 00 59*'I 00'~;'; (Sunil Jepe, t,) Jepe, ;SaMP! LLS9Z 00 00Â£'Z (luautaieidaj jejnduto]) iiac} *ZL9Z 25106 Trane (HVAC mtc agreements) 2,106.03 2,106.03 25374 Trane (Building repairs) 741.99 3,741.99 26357 Phil Long Ford (2010 F ord F45 x2 Fla ed Dump) 34,130.32 69'LEI'EVI'E 1V101 (4019 A.IC] @ 1!el Pabl 00 peOJ OICIJ/BAutaJ) suos 18 AeUJee)1 9 (laBpnq Jed junoute iepiolleoeld spuelspue.IN) gllo>I J oiAe ZLS9Z 24980 Moss Rock Dealers (Peacock Park) (dl~lIN- jsepi~~2.,UF~AI~t 8*S9Z (40 ut Jue.10 - SelOJOjOLU) pe)UeAPV sselej!/Vl 8I99Z '0103 *959Z 1 0 5Â¥18 Aauua>1 ISL9Z TOWN[ OF ESTES PARK Memo Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt From: ~ Bob Goehring, Utilities Director Date: February 9, 2010 RE: Extension of HDR Contract for Marys Lake Water Treatment Plant Background: We are in the final stages of construction at the Marys Lake Water Treatment Facility. On February 8, 2010, GE Zenon began the 28-day acceptance test. A successful completion of this test will finalize the projedt. HDR's last change order for additional construction management services anticipated completion on December 1, 2009. Now with completion expected sometime in early March, we will have additional costs for construction management. We also have two outstanding change order requests with this project - one for $66,240.65 for relocating a furnace and a second one for $28,437.13 to lower a pipe needed to fill the backwash tank. Both of these items required modification from HDR's original design. The change orders total $94,677.78, of which $5,000.00 for furnace ductwork is the Water Department's responsibility. That leaves $89,677.78 as a credit to the Town of Estes Park, which HDR is proposing to extend in trade for services rendered (see attached credit proposal). The Water Department would like to apply the proposed change order credit to: 1. the additional construction management services needed to complete the Marys Lake Water Treatment Facility; and, 2. Phase 2 of a feasibility study for the expansion and modification of the Town's water treatment facilities and distribution system. This study is budgeted for 2010 and must be completed to identify future infrastructure needs and costs, prior to conducting the financial plan and rate study. Attached are Exhibit A, Addendum 3, which details the scope of work for additional services through the plant's commissioning in March and HDR's Exhibit A: Detailed Scope of Work for Town of Estes Park Water Treatment Facilities Plan - Phase 2. Page 1 of 2 TOWN op ESTES PARK, Memo ~ Extension of HDR Contract for Marys Lake Water Treatment Plant Engineering services associated with the feasibility study is quoted at $61,572 in Exhibit A. After the charges for additional engineering services needed to commission Marys Lake Water Treatment Facility are applied, the balance of the change order credit will be extended to the feasibility study. Budget 503-6500-560.22-02 Phase 2 Treatment Plant Expansion/Modification Feasibility Study $80,000 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the acceptance of HDR's froposal for a change order credit in the amount of $89,677.78, to be applied to fees associated with additional engineering services for the commissioning of the Marys Lake Water Treatment Facility, And the feasibility study. Sample Motion: I move to approve/deny HDR's proposal for a change order credit in the amount of $89,677.78, to be applied to fees associated with additional engineering services for the commissioning of the Marys Lake Water Treatment Plant, and the feasibility study in the amountof$61,572. Page 2 of 2 Ir ~~<WATEREDEPARTMENT*f it g CREDIT PROPOSAL FRC)M MDR ON[Â·. CciLPANY I Many Solutions - 1 11 1 1 lili C 1 .1. lili I I . :. . February 2,2010 1.1 - I . Mr. Bob Goehring Estbs Park Municipal Building ~ P. O.Â·Box 1200 170 MacGregorÂ·Ave Estes Park, CO .80517 Dear-Bob, .. ... Afticlied are a'humber of documents that describb our additiondl scope and fed fot. the Mary's. Lake WTP ImproÂ¢ements and a propoded.scope andÂ·fee for Plias6 2 ofthe wat6r treatment ~ evaluation.. .' Two of the documents present. HDR's gdditional st?pe and fee for providing oversight forthe extended startup period for Mary's Lake WTP. The fee estimate is based on our understanding ofthe amount of oversight and coordination still required t6 finish the 28-day test period with - GE) In our discussions of the recent cha'nges at the plant, Bob agreed that the.Town wodd pi8k up $5,000 of the cost of the heat change t6 pay Tot the additional ductworfc and other items that would have been included in the original contract if the heat were installed in the basement the first time around. HDR is expecting to work back time without cost to the Town.to pay for the remaindef of theÂ·costs for moving the heater and moving thE backpulse fill pipeline. The - accounting of the dhange costs is as followk: Change Item Â· . Moltz Cost Cost Assumed by Cost Assumed Estes Park. by HDR . Relocate UVH-101.. $665240.65 $5,000 7 $61,240.65 J 10" BP Feed Pipe . * . Relocation . :'$28,437.13 Â·Â· ,Â· 0 ' $2Â§ 4 j;7.13 Total $94,677.78.. .~- $5,000 $89,677.78 2 . HI)R's labt contract addendum assumed prqiect completionÂ·at the dnd ofNovember 2009. In good faith, the HI)R project team has continued to work towards *completion ofth6 statti-0 ' checkouts and controls coordinati6n through December to the preseht. HDR costs are based on the current contract agreemetit with respect to rates and expenses. Acfual costs incurred to date that will be credited toward the change order costs assumed by.HDR ard as follows: Â· ' â€¢ December 2009 cost total 9 $24,338.17 k January 2010 cost total = $25,531:00 h . HDREng ineering,Inc. 303 East 17th Av6nue Phone: (303) 76+1520 Suite 700 Fax 4303) 860-7139 , . ' ~ Denver, CO 80203-1256 vwm.hdrinc.dom , PAGE 1 2 :iâ€¢ 1% 4- ,i g '6' 1 . . ..4 ,CREDIT PROPOSAL FROM HDR I T ,. I 1 - 4 . . The other,two documents present HI)R's pt6posed scope and fee for the Water Treatment Plant Evaluation - Phase 2. The scope and fee cover the evaluation of reconstructing the Glacier Creek WTP on the existing site to prdvidea cost estimate to be used for future finaribial planning; If the totalÂ·cost to cbmplete.the Mary'Â§ Lake WTP Improve'ments project does not equal the total cost for change 01;ders assumed by HDR, the remainder of that total will be ~; dledited towards work' oh the Phase 2 work. ~ . * 4 Â·Sincerely, I . 0924Â£: Ctki ' 1. Sarah C. Clark, P.E. :- Ken yowre~~.. . Senior Project Manager Â· ~ Â·~ , Vice'President Â· j , cc: Jeff Boles, Town.of Estâ‚¬s Park . . Project File ~ 4 - . J . f . 1 . 0 $ I I . I j *.. ; . I. ,# .. . I , . 2, ...... I -*1 . . 1... . + 1 â€¢ . HDR Engineering, Inc. I . I e PAGE 2 ,. , I Illimilillil 9Â® TOWN of ESTES PARI~_ Memo L:' h.~-1,1.116/-1-Ihl/klq ti 57,)11 TO: Honorable Mayor Pinkham Board of Trustees Town Administrator Halburnt From: Scott A. Zurn, P.E, Public Works Director Date: February 9, 2010 RE: Bond Park Master Plan Background: In June, 2009, after an extensive selection process involving a committee comprised of staff, Town trustees, and local stakeholders, the Town of Estes Park awarded Winston Associates, Inc., of Boulder, a contract to develop a master plan for Bond Park. The bid was submitted for $46,925 with $50,000 encumbered (the additional funds set aside for contingencies) from the Conservation Trust Fund. The plan was developed using six months of public input including focus groups, public meetings, and informal surveys. Attached is a hard copy of the draft Bond Park Master Plan (62 pages) which provides an overview of the public input process and the final plan development. An additional 117 pages of appendix, which includes detail on the stakeholder's meetings, public input forums, and other information is also part of the plan. An electronic copy of the complete plan is available at www.estes.orq by following the "Bond Park Planning" link. If the plan is approved, the next step would be to authorize funding for Phase One, the repaving and reconfiguration to one-way traffic on MacGregor Avenue. Staff recommends implementing Phase One in October, 2010. Budget: 211-5900-459.35-61 Conservation Trust Fund (2008,2009) $50,000 Expended to date: $44,500.00 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the approval of the attached draft Bond Park Master Plan. Sample Motion: I move to approve/deny the draft Bond Park Master Plan, prepared on behalf of the Town of Estes Park by Winston Associates, Inc. PUBLIC WORKSM -/1-Illeealll~ DRAFT BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~ -- -M.-A~~D __ ac --- ii-mr 4.44 1-1.~ --f8>/d 9- 0.- .. a.....1 1bs <04*0kx . 4901. r . 1, \ I 1 Â¥ 4, W I,ii I ./. 4 1 '1- I 2 . lif . e r .9. i . 1 11 . " 46 P 2 ./1, 1-i 4 01 h. f 111-41. . 1,1,4.= . - .% <*t ~INIAL ~iti\VT JANLIARY 2010 .9 :... o~' 364-.- Â·Â·Â·.I -M~~1~11~$+ fi~; r Iâ€¢ TABLE 0 F CONTENTS , INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 3 History of Bond Park 3 Why A Master Plan Was Needed 4 Overview of the Bond Park Master Plan Process 5 The Surrounding Uses 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 Bond Park Site Analysis 9 How Bond Park is Used 13 Goal for the Public Outreach Process 15 Stakeholder Forums and Community Survey 15 PUBLIC OUTREACH 15 Public Forums 20 Project Website and News Releases 23 Park Program, Design Parameters, and Precedent Images 25 PREUMINARY MASTER PLAN CONCEPTS 25 3 D Digital Design Charrette 26 ~ Concepts A, 13, and C 27 Public Reviews and Preference Voting 35 Stakeholder Committee Reviews 37 PREFERRED CONCEPT PLAN 37 Preferred Plan Development 38 Policy Issues 38 Year-Round Activation 39 Highlights of the Preferred Plan 42 Highlights of the Final Master Plan 45 ]JINAL MASTER PLAN 45 Research / Analysis on Materials and Systems 50 Grading and Infrastructure 52 Phasing 55 Opinion of Probable Cost 56 Design Guidelines 57 Funding Options 57 Economic Impacts of Design 62 ~ 2 C,~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN I CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Bond Park has played a vital role in Estes Park since the town was founded in the early 1900's. The land was first designated as a "park" in 1908 and has since served as common open space; a school playground; a site for the post office, town hall, and library; and as the cultural heart of downtown Estes Park. The park is located in the center of Estes Park's central business district, just west of Town Hall. It is bounded on the south by Elkhorn Avenue, Estes Park's primary commercial street, MacGregor Avenue on the east, and Park Lane on the north and west sides of the park. This master plan for Bond Park is a reflection the important role the park will play in Estes Park's the future. This document will summarize the process used to develop the master plan and provides a framework for the park's t~f enhancement. The process used for the master plan relied 1 on a level of public involvement that has not previously ~ been used in Estes Park. Because of this, this master plan is an expression the vision the residents of Estes Park and the downtown community have for Bond park, HISTORY OF BOND PARK -4,2'W.. b .- - -: . - I , ::--1 j The following summary of the early history of Bond Park is .t f 9Â»443 from America's Switzerland by James Pickering and the Estes Figure l: Estes Park looking northwest, circa Pa rk M useum: 1900. "The vacant land that became Bond Park was not shown on the original plat map that Abner Sprague produced in the spring of 1905 for Cornelius Bond and his associates Of the Estes Park Town Company, The group / 4 ... -I. assembled to purchase John Cleave's 185-acre ranch at the confluence of the Big Thompson and Foll River for lail.21.lip35.--tri:Ill::iJJIialilifiUwils/-1-/ the purpose Of laying out a town. The oversight was remedied on the "second Amended Plat of the Town Aug. 1- -t.21.iâ‚¬ of Estes Park," dated April 7, 1908. On this amended plat, the fourteen lots of what had been Block 1 on the north side of lower Elkhorn Avenue were removed and Figure 2: Historic photo of school and post office. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN |- 3 /ntroduction and Background, continued the word "Park" was inserted. Whether F.O. Stanley, who had by then begun construction of the Stanley Hotel, and had already asserted himself as someone interested in the aesthetics and functionality of the new village, or the Estes Park Protective and Improvement Association, a group of local men who were equally concerned in the development Of the new town, were involved in this decision, we do not know. It is likely that Bond and his associates were nudged in the direction Of making available for posterity prime real estate originally intended for other things. For several years, early photographs tell us, Bond Park (it did not officially receive its current name until 1944, 13 years after Cornelius Bond's death) remained an unoccupied open space, used mainly as a playground for the local school house built in 1907 (which sat behind the park on the land occupied by today's First National Bank). To the extent there were any structures in the park to make it seem park-like; they seem to have been limited to a bandbox, though the record here is sparse. By 1914, however, the village post office was erected here on land leased by the as yet unincorporated town to the federal government. Two more buildings would be added -a public library and town hall. The stucco, wood, and stone library - matching the post office - was built during the spring and summer of 1922 by the Estes Park Woman's Club at a cost Of about $5,000, with much of the actual construction being done by village men (a wing, made possible by Eleanor Hondius of Elkhorn Lodge, in memory of her husband, Pieter, would be added years later). The town hall was completed in the fall of 1924. Constructed of moss-covered granite and roofed with slate tile shingles, it was sited back-to-back with the post office (its entrance faced Virginia Drive). In addition to a meeting room for village trustees, the town hall contained a jail cell and a garage large enough to house the town's new White Motor fire truck. By the summer Of 1925, the Chamber Of Commerce had been invited to establish an office at the front end. In brief, Bond Park, until relatively recently, when the final building, the library, was removed, was mostly a park in name only.". With the removal of the final structure from Bond Park, the Town developed the site into the open green space that people enjoy today. Bond Park is truly a green oasis in the downtown and valued by residents as critical open space. It is well used by visitors to Estes Park as a place for an informal picnic and a shady respite. It has also become a popular venue for a wide range of special events and festivals. These events have become a major draw, attracting tens of thousands of residents and visitors to downtown Estes Park, making Bond Park a critical component of the Town's economic profile. WHY A MASTER PLAN WAS NEEDED The value of Bond Park to Estes Park's residents was made abundantly clear throughout the master plan process. It has played an important role in the history of the town and nearly all residents who participated in the master plan process said the park was critical open space -- especially for the downtown. Bond Park also hosts 10 major events from May through October. This is in addition to a number of smaller events held throughout the summer months such as Cowboy Sing-Alongs. As more and more activities were held in Bond Park, it became clear the park's facilities and natural systems could not continue to sustain the level of use the park was seeing. 4/~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN /ntroduction and Background, continued In recent years the Board of Trustees looked at options for improving Bond Park, including scaling back on the number of events being held in the park. In a 2008 survey, the Town asked the downtown community if the events being held in Bond Park should be scaled back or moved to the Fairgrounds. Over 80% of the respondents to that survey supported maintainingthe current schedule of events in Bond Park. Given the support for maintaining the current level of use, the Board of Trustees determined a master plan would be necessary for Bond Park in order to "redevelop the park to serve multiple uses for the future decades and establish a more flexible space to enhance both the local resident's and visitor's experience." The primary goals for the Bond Park Master Plan were: b Actively involve the residents and park users in the master plan process. A Create a clear vision for the park that is easily understood by the public. Look for opportunities to encourage winter-time use of the park and attract more people to the downtown during the winter months. Find ways to protect the natural systems in the park and make them sustainable. Create a plan to update the park's infrastructure. Establish a master plan that would allow the improvements to be phased and allow the Town to apply for grants or other sources of funding. For example, a master plan is required to apply for Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) grants. ,:i. OVERVIEW OF THE BOND PARK MASTER PLAN PROCESS The Town determined that an innovative process would be required to reach consensus on a master plan for Bond Park. Because of the important role Bond Park plays in the community, it would be critical to actively involve the key use groups and stakeholders throughout the master plan's development. Helping the decision-makers and general public clearly understand the vision for the park was also critical. To accomplish these goals, the process used to develop the master plan for Bond Park included the following elements: 4 A Stakeholder Committee to help guide the plan and provide regular feedback. This group was composed of Town Board Members, members of the Planning Commission, Local Marketing District, the Visitors and Convention Bureau; downtown merchants and business owners; and Town Staff who are involved in the day- to-day operations of Bond Park. 4 An extensive public outreach process that utilized a community-wide on-line survey, a project web site, email, public forums, focus groups, and one-on-one discussions with representatives from key user groups to solicit input from the community. Interviews and regular communication with Town Staff throughout the master plan process. Illustrative plan graphics and 3D modeling to help the public visualize the improvements being proposed for Bond Park. News releases. Displays at Town Hall and events in Bond Park. Presentations to the Board of Trustees. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN -15 *** * * b * b * . /ntroduction and Background, continued The master plan process started in mid-summer 2009 with the analysis of the existing conditions and public outreach ~ process extending into fall. The master plan concepts were developed and brought to the public in September and October, with the final Bond Park Master Plan document completed by the end of 2009. 6/. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN I CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Understanding the existing conditions in and around Bond -- Park is an important first step in the master plan process. It is critical to identify the existing features that should be - protected or that will need to be enhanced to meet the - current and long-term needs of the park. Determining - how the park relates to its surroundings is also an essential element in the master plan process. - ~ P THE SURROUNDING USES W.. Bond Park is surrounded by Estes Park's main civic buildings --::m#'-p:' and central business district. The Town Hall complex is Figure 3: Parking on MacGregor Avenue. immediately east of the park, just across MacGregor Avenue. The Town's municipal offices, police station, and public ~ library are part of this group of buildings. Town Hall includes a public restroom that is heavily used by visitors to the downtown. Commercial uses are immediately north and south of the park (north of Park Lane and south of Elkhorn Avenue) and the remainder of downtown Estes Park extends east and west from the park along Elkhorn Avenue. This places Bond Park at the civic heart of Estes Park. ROADS AND PARKING Bond Park is surrounded on all sides by roads and parking. A MacGregor Avenue is a two lane, two-way street which has 30 angle parking spaces, three of which are handicap spaces adjacent to Town Hall. There are 17 parking spaces adjacent to Bond Park on MacGregor Avenue. 4 Park Lane is a two-lane, two-way street angling southwest across the north side of the park. There are 17 angle parking spaces adjacent to Bond Park and another 22 angle parking spaces on the north side of the street. 50 Park Lane continues south along the west side of the park to a traffic signal at the intersection of Park Lane and Elkhorn Avenue. There is no on-street parking on this portion of Park Lane. & Elkhorn Avenue abuts the south side of the Bond Park and has six parallel parking spaces, one of which is a handicap space. Elkhorn Avenue is a State Highway and subject to the Colorado Department of BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Existing Conditions, cont'd Transportation's (CDOT's) oversight. There is a bus drop off immediately south of Town Hall that is used by the Town's Free Visitor Shuttle and tour buses bringing visitors to Estes Park. The Virginia Avenue public parking lot is immediately west of Park Lane and holds 18 parking spaces. There are five other major public parking lots within 1,000 feet of Bond Park offering hundreds of additional parking spaces. In addition, public parking can be found north of the park on MacGregor and Virginia Avenues. 29 Elkhorn Avenue sees extremely heavy traffic, especially during the summer with bumper-to-bumper traffic on the weekends. Vehiculartraffic on Elkhorn Avenue reaches levels on summer weekends where it is only realistic to cross the street at signalized intersections. Both Park Lane and MacGregor Avenue see lower volumes of vehicular traffic with the majority of the traffic due to drivers looking for parking spaces. Obviously, winter traffic volumes are greatly reduced on all streets in the vicinity of Bond Park. |MPORTANCE OF PARKING IN THE DOWNTOWN Even with the long list of public parking in the immediate vicinity of Bond Park, there is a chronic parking shortage in downtown Estes Park. This comment was heard throughout the public outreach phase of the project. However, a number of people felt the ring of parking that surrounds the park had a negative impact -- reducing its value as park land and green space. Clearly, addressing Estes Park's parking shortage is beyond . 4."17 the scope of this master plan. However, it became clear early on in the master plan process that because of this shortage, permanently eliminating parking spaces adjacent ...< ilih to Bond Park was not a viable option. If at some point in the future the parking shortage in the downtown is addressed, the Town should consider eliminating parking adjacent to Bond Park to give it a more park-like setting. ~--144*wi 7;%~,1'"Allill Figure 4: Parking around Bond Park. 8 ~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN b Â¢ F Existing Conditions, cont'd PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 1~//////////// During the summer months there are thousands of visitors i-4.~ walking in the vicinity of Bond Park -- primarily along Elkhorn Avenue. That number greatly increases on summer weekends. Pedestrians generally stay on the sidewalks at the edges of the 15*-r-~ 1-I. park or use Bond Park as a shortcut to the parking north and east - 1.- 4-1 - ./1./ of the park or the public restrooms. EE16~11- The Town's park maintenance staff notes that the existing path -- system in the park does not necessarily reflect the current circulation patterns in the park. Based on their observations, the -6 .. ... primary pedestrian route through the park runs diagonally from the intersection of Park Lane and Elkhorn toward the northeast Figure 5: Pedestrians along E/khorn Avenue. cornerofthepark. BOND PARK SITE ANALYSIS Including the sidewalks adjacent to the streets, the total area of Bond Park is just over an acre (45,755 SF). The "green" portion of the park (shrub beds, grass, and trees) totals 38,950 SF, or 0.9 acre. The average Estes Park resident would probably be very surprised to learn Bond Park is only and acre in size, given the important role it plays in the community. i ..9.k 9.74:. ' >le I Â» , iÂ·, */IM... * ~'. *.. + 1_ :1*:s - Figure 6: Panorama of Bond Park in the winter. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN --29 ./.12 Existing Conditions, cont'd The findings of the Master Plan Team's analysis of Bond Park's existing systems and facilities include: EXISTING VEGETATIONI There are mature trees throughout Bond Park with nearly a 50/50 ratio of evergreen trees to deciduous trees. The evergreen trees have been declining in recent years, and are being removed them as they become safety hazards. The cause of the decline is not readily identifiable and could be due to natural causes or even foot traffic. The Town has had an arborist evaluate the evergreen trees and, while the Town's maintenance staff has taken steps to improve the health of the trees, success has been limited. It is assumed that all of the evergreen trees will eventually need to be removed. The direction to the Master Plan Team was to save evergreen trees where possible, but not let the locations of the existing evergreens dictate the development of the concept plans. The deciduous trees in the park are generally healthy and should be preserved where possible. The most notable trees are a group of six large cottonwoods at the southeast corner of the park. These trees provide shade for picnic tables and park benches at the corner of MacGregor and Elkhorn as well as creating an attractive entry to the park. TURF AREAS The majority of the park is covered in Bluegrass turf. These lawn areas are well used for both informal picnicking and recreation as well as for special events. During the larger summer festivals up to 100, 10' x 10' vendor tents are set up - on the turf for two or three day weekends. While these events do a wonderful job of bringing people to downtown Estes Park, they cause serious compaction problems for the sod. The turf grasses in the high-use areas cannot stand up to this level of use and have needed to be replaced every three to four years. The damage to the sod is compounded by the poor drainage conditions in some areas of the park. If Bond Park is to remain viable in the years to come, identifying a sustainable solution to maintaining sod in the park will be essential. 6. - W ... . IL I . I./ 0.,0 r 16- . - ... 25*/44=!eÂ»-y- - 1- 1 ' .. - r.4 rfÂ·'*0'2 Figure 7: Construction in Bond Park. logy BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Existing Conditions, cont'd TOPOGRAPHYAND DRAINAGE For the most part, Bond Park is relatively flat. While there is actually seven feet of fall from its high point in the northwest corner to the low point in the southeast corner, most of this change in grade occurs in the first 25' at the northwest corner. This leaves only 4' of fall across the center of the park, or a slope of 1.7% (+/- 1'- 8" of fall in 100'). A slope of 2% is generally preferable forturf, which explains why some areas of sod do not drain well. If the park is refurbished, it will be desirable to either increase the slope for the turf or add subdrains -- especially given the level of use the park receives. There are no storm drains in the vicinity of Bond Park. All storm water sheet flows across the site to the gutter in Elkhorn, where it then flows 600' to the east to the nearest storm inlet. This lack of storm drains in the area of Bond Park could be a design constraint if it is determined that subdrains are needed new park facilities. When the old library, town hall, and post office were demolished, the foundations for some or all of these buildings were left in place and buried. It may be necessary, or at least prudent, to remove these structures when the park is refurbished. UTILITIES ~ There are few buried utilities in Bond Park itself, but there is a full compliment of utilities in the streets surrounding the park. This infrastructure network should have the capacity to support any of the facilities typically found in a downtown park. There are a number of existing above grade utility appurtenances (electrical panels, electrical boxes, transformers, etc.) at the edges of the park. Decorative streetlights have been installed along the sidewalks surrounding the park and at regular intervals along the paths running through the center of site. There is an existing below-grade irrigation system in Bond Park, which Parks Maintenance Staff has been maintaining and upgrading on a regular basis. However, any improvement plan for the park should include a complete refurbishment of the irrigation system not only to adapt the system to the new park layout, but to bring it in line with current Town irrigation design and equipment standards. EXISTING PARK FACILITIES Bond Park does not offer many of the typical facilities often found in a park. There is no play equipment, ballfields or court facilities, and no picnic shelters. The only structure is the Visitor Information building, which is small log cabin- like building on skids which does not appear to meet current ADA guidelines. The park also includes: A drinking fountain nearthe Visitor Information booth. A recessed gas fire pit surrounded by a 15' x 15' sandstone patio near the southwest corner. An abandoned natural rock water feature in the center of the site. Park benches, picnic tables, and trash receptacles, which are generally found along the Elkhorn Avenue edge. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN <1 1 **** Existing Conditions, cont'd 4 An enhanced streetscape treatment along Elkhorn Avenue with decorative paving (concrete with brick paving ~ accents and brick bands), decorative streetlights, and raised brick planters at the corners. 4 A landscape timber retaining wall with built in benches and steps is found at the northwest corner of the site Statues and Monuments A number of statues, monuments, and historic plaques have been placed in Bond Park, some dating back to the early part of the 20th Century. These plaques, statues, and monuments should be accommodated in any plan to upgrade the park, The most notable include: #* A bronze statue of Enos Mills and his dog set on a large sandstone boulder. The members of the community who were responsible for the placement of this statue attended the public meetings and urged that the statue remain in the park; in its current location if possible, or with the same orientation if it needs to be moved. #* There are at leastthree bronze plaques on boulders scattered throughout the park that appeared to have been placed in conjunction with planting a tree. Two are near the Visitors Information booth and were placed by the Estes Park Women's Club in the 19305 (to Imogene McPherson and Mary King Sherman). A third is in the northwest corner near the timber retaining wall and dedicated to "Harfe". b There are three interpretative signs in the park with photos and historic information about the site, the Long Lake Flood, and historic structures in the vicinity. 12~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Existing Conditions, cont'd ~ HOW BOND PARK IS USED Most residents of Estes Park only visit Bond Park during a special event (see Stakeholder Forums and Community Survey below). This is probably due to the fact that the park functions primarily as open space and there are no typical park facilities. It should be noted that during the public outreach process, a few local residents requested that amenities such as play equipment for small children be added to the park. However, there were also a significant numberof residents who asked thatthe park remain primarily as open green space. EVENTS HOSTED IN BOND PARK Bond Park is the venue for a full calendar of events throughout the late spring, summer, and fall months. These events range from sing-alongs that attract small groups to major festivals attracting 10,000 to 15,000 local residents and visitors. Clearly these events make a major contribution to the economic vitality of the downtown, but they also create Table 1: Events hosted in Bond Park throughout the year. DATE .4, EVENT EQUIPMENT/ACTIVITIES ATTENDANCE MAY 10' x 10' vendor booths Art Market 10,000 23rd - 25th Qty: 100 JUNE Kids games, bounce castle, food booth, Kids Fun Run 150 13th small band. Music 27th - 28th Scandinavian Festival 10' x 10' vendor booths (Qty: 30 8,000 Cultural display areas (14x24 Qty: 4) JULY 100+ vintage cars in park and surround- Coolest Car Show 10,000 4th ing area. Food booth AUGUST 100+ vintage cars in park and surround- Auto Extravaganza 10,000 15th ing area. Food booth Hay rides, museum displays Food booths 22nd - 23rd Heritage Festival 10,000 10' x 10' vendor booths. Various sizes of booths SEPTEMBER Labor Day Craft Show 10' x 10' vendor booths (Qty: 100+) 15,000 5th - 7th 19th -20th Fine Arts Guild Art Show 10' x 10' vendor booths (Qty: 100+) 10,000 "Beer, Brats and Bands" 26th - 27th Autumn Gold Restricted access - Beer and food served 10,000 Several bands Educational booths OCTOBER Elk Fest 10' x 10' vendor booths (Qty: 60) 8,000 3rd - 4th Music. Educational Seminars OTHER 3 times/week (nights) (32 weeks during Cowboy Singalongs Sing around the campfire 150/night ~ summer) BOND PARK MASTER PLAN <13 Existing Conditions, cont'd congestion and tax the resources of the park and Town Staff. Developing a site plan for the park that is designed to accommodate the current schedule of events is a major goal of this study. Table 1 lists the events currently held in Bond Park and their programmatic requirements. Since this level of programming also has a negative effect on the natural systems in Bond Park, another goal of this study is to recommend ways to reduce the impact major events have on the turf and vegetation in the park and to suggest ways to make the park's natural systems sustainable. 14~~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN I CHAPTER 3 PUBLIC OUTREACH GOAL FOR THE PUBLIC OUTREACH PROCESS As part of the Bond Park Master Plan development process, the Master Plan Team was engaged by the Town to undertake significant public outreach, including stakeholder forums and a community survey, to identify priorities, concerns, and conceptual ideas for the future of Bond Park. The primary goal of this outreach was to identify community attitudes and build community support for the Bond Park redesign from beginning to end. STAKEHOLDER FORUMS AND COMMUNITY SURVEY STAKEHOLDER Focus GROUPS In the initial phase of the Bond Park redesign, the Master Plan Team held a series of four focus groups with key stakeholders involved with or impacted by a Bond Park redesign. The purpose of the focus groups was to determine priorities for the project and to understand the unique needs and concerns of individual stakeholder groups before initial design concepts were developed. The focus groups included: Tab/e 2: Focus Group Attendees â€¢ Town Board of Trustees â€¢ Town Administrator and Deputy Town Town â€¢ Planning Commission Adrninistrator Representatives â€¢ Town Department Heads â€¢ Convention and Visitors' Bureau â€¢ Estes Valley Partners for Commerce â€¢ Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority â€¢ Estes Valley Parks and Recreation District â€¢ Local Marketing District Board Civic Partners â€¢ School Board â€¢ Library District â€¢ Tree Board â€¢ Hospital Board â€¢ Arts Community / Fine Arts Guild â€¢ Noon Rotary â€¢ Families for Estes â€¢ League of Women Voters Community â€¢ Lions Club â€¢ Kiwanis Club Partners â€¢ Sustainable Mountain Living â€¢ Newcombers Club â€¢ Sunrise Notary â€¢ Park event organizers Downtown â€¢ Downtown Merchants Estes Park â€¢ Downtown Property owners Stakeholders BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~15 Pub/ic Outreach, continued The Master Plan Team facilitated a focus group meeting with each stakeholder group to understand: How they see the park evolving in the future and their long-term vision for Bond Park. The improvements that need to occur in Bond Park to achieve that vision. The priorities for short-term, mid-term, and long term investment in Bond Park. How public and private sectors should be working together to implement improvements to Bond Park. The focus groups allowed the Master Plan Team to understand the unique priorities of each stakeholder group as well as overall priorities for the Bond Park redesign process. Key findings from the focus groups included suggestions for improvements in three primary categories: The complete findings from the focus groups can be found in the Appendix. Table 3: Suggested /mprovements by Category â€¢ Retain smaller, community events â€¢ Create a better configuration that pro- in the park, but rnove larger events hibits events from overwhelming the park Events in Bond (100+ tents) outside of Bond Park â€¢ Look at opportunities to extend the park â€¢ Look at ways to activate the park Park space (i.e. MacGregor Avenue) for event year-round, particularly with winter use events and activities â€¢ Retain green space and open space as â€¢ Maintain the mountain views much as possible, and allow for places to â€¢ Make it seasonally pleasant, i.e. a Physical sit, enjoy and relax lovely place to be year-round Environment and â€¢ Enhance the environment with more at- â€¢ Landscaping should act as a wind Landscape tractive landscaping, plantings, flowers, barrier color â€¢ Landscaping should be sensitive to â€¢ Retain the tree cover as much as possible the businesses around the park â€¢ Places for people to sit, benches, tables, â€¢ Make it a farnily-friendly place etc. â€¢ Explore the use of water features Bond Park â€¢ Shelter from the weather â€¢ Fire pit would be a nice addition year- Amenities â€¢ Some forrn of more permanent perfor- round mance venue â€¢ Ice Skating Rink in the winter 16~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN 9'*** Public Outreach, continued COMMUNITY SURVEY In addition to the stakeholder forums conducted as part of the public outreach process, the Master Plan Team also worked with the Town to survey business and property owners, residents, and visitors to determine their priorities for a redesign of Bond Park. The community-wide on-line survey generated 356 responses and provided meaningful input into the Bond Park Master Plan design process. The survey was distributed via advertisements in the town newspapers and direct email solicitation to dozens of local community organizations. The following key findings emerged from the community survey: Bond Park Today *M Visitation to Downtown Estes Park remains relatively consistent year-round, with a slight dip during the winter months. Currently, there is little to no programming and activity throughout the winter months to provide visitors with a compelling draw to Downtown and Bond Park, while activities are well programmed during other times of the year. This suggests that even a small amount of winter activation could pay dividends in increasing year-round use of both Downtown and Bond Park. b Respondents were asked about their visitation to Downtown Estes Park, and results showed extraordinary visitation numbers. 45% of all respondents noted they visit Downtown daily, a frequency that is unique for most business districts. 4 Given the high general visitation to Downtown, use of Bond Park is relatively low, with the majority of respondents visiting only a few times per year, and most of those visits related to events. Very few individuals are using the park recreationally when events are not occurring. Some respondents noted they enjoy walking their dogsthrough the park and sometimes use it as a meeting space; however there were equal number of responses from respondents who noted that they primarily use Bond Park currently as a shortcut to Town Hall. 4 Nearly all of the events currently programmed in Bond Park are well attended, and the support for events is strong throughout the survey results. However, many comments also suggest that both current and future events need to be more thoughtfully executed to ensure care and preservation of Bond Park as an asset for the community. b When asked to describe Bond Park today, Estes Park residents noted seeing the park as a centerpiece and gathering place for the community while visitors noted they appreciate that green, natural space still exists within the bustling Downtown environment. A majority of respondents said they feel that the "shine" has left the park, and that it is a beautiful amenity that should be refreshed and reinvigorated. Planning for the Future of Bond Park 4 A majority of respondents noted that "a user-friendly space that welcomes and invites activity from people of all ages" was most important to them in redevelopment of the park. A close second was having "a space that can play host to town gatherings and events." BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~17 Public Outreach, continued b When presented with a list of 16 potential park amenities, and asked to rank their importance in inclusion in ~ the park redesign, three amenities emerged as most important: open grass areas, sitting and viewing areas (including benches and tables) and landscaping. b When asked about what types of events or programming respondents would like to see in Bond Park in the future, the overwhelming number of write-in responses made it clearthat events are an important part of the culture of the park and will be an important part of how it is used going forward. Most interesting are the types of events people want to see, which primarily include smaller, more intimate community scale events which respect the aesthetics of the park. 4 When forced to choose how they would most prefer to use Bond Park - Passive Use, Active Use, or Preserve Use - more than 53% of respondents chose a passive use for the park, consistent with many of the other survey responses. Community survey respondents appear to value the ability to have an open, user-friendly, flexible park space that is not over-programmed. Improving the Park b The majority of respondents to the survey support a redesign of Bond Park, with most community members stating that the design needs to be thoughtful and meaningful before the plan will get their full support. b When asked how the public and private sectors should be involved in supporting a Bond Park redesign, respondents noted that both the public and private sectors must work together to support and fund the redevelopment. 4 The majority of respondents feel improving Bond Park ultimately will be beneficial to Downtown Estes Park, ~, as long as the redevelopment is done with intentional ties to the existing design of the business district. A complete summary of the survey results can be found in the Appendix. ONE-ON-ONE CONTACTS In addition to the focus groups, the Master Plan Team also held one-on-one meetings throughout the planning process with key stakeholders. These interviews were held with key event organizers in the park and other downtown stakeholders whose input was important to the park redevelopment process. FINDINGS Several key points emerged from this significant public outreach process and have remained central to the Bond Park redesign process. 18~~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Public Outreach, continued Overall Park Design The following elements have been encompassed in the overall design of the park: 4 Sustainable: The park design needs to be sustainable, one that looks inviting and polished year-round and that can still accommodate the traffic generated by visitors and events. It must "wear well". It should be a multi-use, all-season facility. 4 Community Centerpiece: Bond Park should be maintained as the centerpiece for the community. When asked to describe Bond Park today, the majority of respondents noted they thought of the park in this way. The design should respect the history and character of the community, and the park's placement as the only green space in the midst of a bustling business district. â€¢> Support the Downtown Business District: Every decision made about the design and programming must be made with the downtown business district in mind. Bond Park should be an amenity of, and asset to, the business district in Downtown Estes Park. 4 Create a Tie to the Natural Setting of Estes Park: One of the survey respondents said it best - "the quality of design in Bond Park should be recognizable as being distinctive to Estes Park and its natural setting." Many individuals in both the forums and the focus groups discussed the importance of retaining views and incorporating plantings and amenities to the park that are indigenous to the area, and to creating a design that is "undeniably Estes Park." Among the many important aspects of the park, 20% of respondents to the survey noted they currently come to the park for wildlife viewing. T his type of activity should continue to be welcomed and encouraged. Key Park Uses Many uses of the park were suggested throughout the public outreach process. Ultimately, the following should be considered the key uses of the park going forward, and the design has been created to refiect these uses: 4 Maintain Bond Park for Primarily "Passive Use"Â· There is a strong desire to keep Bond Park a space dedicated to primarily passive use, in fact nearly 40% of users note this is currently how they use the park. 70% of respondents ranked open grass areas as the top amenity important in the redesign of Bond Park, while just a few less ranked sitting and viewing areas, includingbenchesandtables, as important. Landscaping that's visually appealing rounded out the top three. Additionally, the community and stakeholders noted a strong desire to retain Bond Park as a place that is flexible and open for many uses and to avoid too many permanent structures that would limit its adaptability. 4 The Park Must Still be a "Home" for Community Events: Among the biggest dilemmas encountered during the public outreach for the park redesign was whether the park should continue to play host to special events. Ultimately, as the only public gathering space in the heart of the town, events are a part of the park's history and will be a part of the park's future (respondents noted events are currently the #1 reason they use the park). Instead of asking "if" events should continue in Bond Park, the question now becomes "how" the park design can support events, Clearly, the current design and configuration is not working for all parties. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN <19 Pub/ic Outreach, continued While event organizers like the flexibility and ease of set-up, the grass cannot survive this level of use and is ~ expensive to replace every three to four years. Community members noted in the survey the park constantly looks overburdened by the size of events being held in the park and the number of people using the space at once. Going forward, the Bond Park Master Plan will address a better configuration for events. Park Programming As addressed in the park uses section above, events will continue to be a part of the park's key offerings, but the way events are presented in the park must be well thought-out. In addition to carefully evaluating current offerings, community members and stakeholders made the following suggestions for programming Bond Park in the future: b Smaller, Community Focused Events: Stakeholders and community members are interested in seeing more events focused on bringing the community together as well as events that are family-friendly, including small musical performances, art gatherings, movies in the park, farmer's markets, etc. .9 Year-Round Activation: It's clear that finding ways to activate Bond Park year-round is a big opportunity area. Currently, there are very few activities that take place in downtown (and none in the park) between fall and spring. Year-round activation can address this by adding elements that invite activity duringthe winter months (fire pits, ice skating rink, better lighting) and by programming new activities and events (ice sculptures, snow shoeing, holiday lighting and festivals, etc.) that bring both locals and visitors to downtown and the park. This, in turn, helps to support the downtown business district as well. & Civic Square Programming: The park's proximity to Town Hall and the library naturally create a tie to the old-time philosophy of "park as civic square". Several forum attendees and survey respondents suggested heightening civic activity in the park, including hosting government forums, educational programming and historical talks/displays. PUBLIC FoRUMS The public outreach process also included two public forums open to all members of the community. The forums were well advertised through notices placed in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette, postings on the project website, and notifying the participants in focus groups and stakeholder groups. The forums were both well attended with over 30 residents attending the first meeting and 14 braving a snow storm to attend the 2nd meeting. These public forums provided an insight into the community's thoughts about Bond Park and the master plan process. They were also an opportunity to review and comment on the Concept Plans for the park. PUBLIC FoRUM #1 The goal for Public Forum #1 (held on September 2nd, 2009) was to provide an overview of the master plan process and to present Concepts A, B, and C for redeveloping Bond Park. The three concept plans are described in more detail in Section D below. At this meeting, Town Staff and the Master Plan Team made a brief slide presentation that described: 20~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Public Outreach, continued 1-1 1 b Why a master plan was needed and the goals for ~ L ' 1 - 1 . the study 4 The master plan process and schedule, the steps .~. completed to that point, and how the park was 1--(CÂ¥'g kerfl. currently being used. 4 The public outreach process and the findings - of the focus groups and the community-wide ---1.1-- - . ,â€¢al survey. m'z<,"*. 4 The park program, the design parameters, and - the three concept plans. Figure 8: Public Forum #1. Following the presentation, residents were given an opportunity to offer their comments and suggestions during an open forum. The last half of the meeting was an open house were attendees could review the concept plans and speak directly with Town Staff and the Master Plan Team. In addition, comment sheets and voting forms were provided that allowed meeting participants to vote for their favorite concept as well as provide written comments on the concept plans or other issues or concerns. The response from the individuals attending the meeting was generally positive and supportive of the concept plans. ~ The input from the public by and large focused on the following themes: A Why do the concept plans all include a stage when the Town already has a Performance Park? 4 Where will the Car Show be held in the park? 4 The views from Elkhorn Avenue to the businesses north of the park on Park Lane need to be considered. Businesses will be hurt if they can't be seen. Also bring activity to the north edge of the park to increase visibility. The Riverwalk and riverfront already offer an abundance of water features, the town doesn't need more. Water features are expensive to build and maintain. Make the park a quiet relaxing place (simple and low key) and be sure structures don't block mountain views. Ice skating would be a good addition to the downtown, but the plan needs to consider providing screening from winter winds. ae Parking in the downtown is a major problem. Concerned about loosing parking spaces even for short periods of time. Will need to replace the MacGregor Avenue handicap spaces during to the temporary closures. 4 Will electrical power be available to the tents shown in the event configuration? 4 Liked idea of getting tents off the grass Please see the Appendix for a complete summary of Public Forum #1's verbal comments. The written comments from the forum addressed nearly every aspect of the three concept plans and included ~ suggestions to improve on, or combine features from each plan. Common themes included: BOND PARK MASTER PLAN <21 60 * e * Public Outreach, continued b Mixed feeling regarding including a water feature in the park. There were nearly as many people excited about the idea as there were concerned about the cost and long-term maintenance. 4 While a number of comments supported the idea of adding more winter activities and events, there was an even split regarding ice rink. However, those questioning an ice rink seemed to be most concerned about the winter winds and the ice melting. It's not clear if they would support an ice rink that was kept frozen with ice making equipment. A number spoke in favor of keeping Bond Park as green as possible. There were a number of people who complimented the Town on the inclusive master plan process and the concept plans. There were 30 concept voting forms submitted during the open house portion of the meeting with Concept A receiving 14 votes, Concept B four votes, and Concept C 12 votes. One common theme from the written comments was a suggestion to include Concept A's tent configuration in Concept C. Please see the Appendix for a detailed summary of the concept voting results and written comments. PUBLIC FORUM #2: The second public forum was held on October 8th, 2009. The main goal was to present the Preferred Plan for Bond Park to the public. The Preferred Plan is described in detail in Section E below. This presentation was also used to summarize the voting results and comments from the review of Concepts A, B, and C, and to describe how the Preferred Plan was developed. Once again, the meeting started with a brief presentation by the Master Plan Team that described: 4 The reasons why a master plan is necessary. b The work completed-to-date and upcoming milestones. 4 The final results from the preference voting for the concepts (Concept A: 177, Concept B: 207, and Concept C: 204). Votes were tabulated from Public Forum #1, a Labor Day weekend review, Town Staff review, and the review of concepts on-line. 4 The goals, design parameters, and programming/activation for Bond Park that evolved out of the public involvement process. b How the Preferred Plan was developed including points of consensus from the Stakeholder Committee reviews. 4 The Preferred Concept plan including the typical and event conditions (including a review of the 3D model of the plan) along with cost projections for the improvements. The presentation ended with a Keypad Polling exercise. Each meeting participant was given a keypad that allowed them to record their preferences for prioritizing the amenities shown in the Preferred Plan. The Keypad Polling questions and results were as follows: 22/e BOND PARK MASTER PLAN * b Public Outreach, continued The comments and questions from the individuals who Which amenity is the most important to attended the meeting covered the following topics. include in Bond Park? 40 9 U.- 35 -- 1 4 How will the stage be used and what type of 30 performances will be held there? Does this ------ 15 20 1â€¢ duplicate the Performance Park? 15 10 4 Will the closure of MacGregor Avenue adversely 5 , 1*, 0- impact traffic in the area or create congestion on Fire Pit Water Shade Ice Ank Gateway Elkho,n Elkham le,ture Structufe Shetter al Ave Ave Plaza ~ Park Lane? 0% ele Southwest Seat,0311 F.re Pit Be:f How many people will the fire pit seating area hold? - --1 Like the Elkhorn Avenue gateway shelter, but would Which amenity is your second choice to include in Bond Park? not want to see it block views to Long's Peak. b Will there be breaks in the seatwall along Elkhorn 70~ 64 60 Avenue? 50 - A Why not identify locations for additional art in Bond < 1// Park? Â®il 20 ' 14 am Concerned about the cost and the potential for 10 - 0 damaging the Enos Mills sculpture if it is moved. Fire Pit Witer Shade k,Rmk Gate.2, Eli:horn Elkhorn Â¥eau- Structu'fe Shener at Ave A,e Plaza Ove, the Southwee Seatwalt Why not leave the sculpture in the current location? Fire P,1 Cornef Could night lighting be added for the sculpture? 6 Which amenity is the le-@sj impOIt-ant to Will the bollards have lights? include in Bond Park? Ice skating is important, Is there enough space , 69 m Â· available if ice skating proves to be successful and 60 -' 50 - needs to be expanded? 40 4 A Park Lane business owner liked the idea of a 30 15 removable tent structure for the stage (will block 20 . . views less than a permanent structure) and wanted Are At Water Shade ice Rlk Gatewa, Elkhown Elkhorn to be sure the proposed tree plantings maintain Feature Structure Shetter / Ave Arp Plaza E Over the Southwest Seatwall hre Pit Corner views to the Park Lane business. 4 Is the fire pit necessary and is it shown too large in Figure 9: Results from Keypad Polling at the plan? Public Forum #2. The comments and suggestions expressed by the public during the 2nd public forum (along with others that were received via email after the forum) were taken into account as the Final Master Plan was developed. PROJECT WEBSITE AND NEWS RELEASES In addition to the public outreach steps described above, a website was created specifically for the master plan 1 (bondparkmasterplan.com). This web site was used throughout the master plan process to disseminate information to BOND PARK MASTER PLAN <23 b * Pub/ic Outreach, continued the community and to provide a way for the community to communicate with the Master Plan Team and Town Staff. In each stage of the master plan, information and links were provided on the web site that gave interested individuals an opportunity to: 4 Take the on-line community-wide survey. Comment on and vote for their favorite concept plan (Concepts A, B, and C) and to download images of the plans. Over 125 comments were received and nearly 170 preference votes were submitted via this link. Review, comment on, and download the Preferred Plan. Read press releases. Review summaries of each public forum. Learn more about the master plan process and the Master Plan Team. Review a project schedule and learn about upcoming events and milestones. Find out how to get involved in the process and who to contact. Town Staff also issued monthly press releases to the Estes Park Trail-Gazette in order to reach residents who do not have computers. The press releases updated the community on the master plan process and upcoming events, told people how to submit comments, and where tofind additional information both on-line and at Town Hall. 24~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN I CHAPTER 4 PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN CONCEPTS Beginning with input gathered from the public outreach process and incorporating the findings from the review of the existing conditions, preliminary concept plans were developed for Bond Park. The process used to develop these preliminary site plans for the park was also based on: A program of potential park elements and facilities. A summary of the design parameters that would guide the development of the concept plans. A review of design details in Estes Park that would be appropriate for an enhanced Bond Park. A Digital 3D Design Charrette with the Stakeholder Committee. PARK PROGRAM, DESIGN PARAMETERS, AND PRECEDENT |MAGES Priorto developing concept plans for the park, the Master Plan Team worked with the Stakeholder Committee and Town Staff to develop a park program, or list of potential park improvements. This program was used during the 3D Digital Design Charrette to test a series of configurations of the program elements on the site. The preliminary program included: Large areas of open turf Shrub beds, perennial beds, trees Family picnic areas Areas of special paving (e.g. plazas that could serve a dual use during special events) Accommodations for up to 100. 10' x 10' special event vendor tents Benches and seating areas Natural stone veneer seatwalls Boulder seating Group picnic shelter Stage / bandstand Natural stone stage the looks like a rock-outcropping Combination group picnic shelter and bandstand Ice skating rink (informal, not for sports) Water feature Sculptures /art (historic figures such as F. 0. Stanley, wildlife, or whimsical) Fire pit Bus stop BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~25 f * * 9 Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued In addition to the preliminary park program, a set of design -aillit -_ I parameters was established to help guide the development of the master plan concepts. Need a flexible site plan that can accommodate a -/'/9/25â€ž'llimilfi variety of uses. Â£--I-~t Plan for sustainable and long-lasting materials. Minimize the loss of parking spaces adjacent to the -,1.â€žâ€žâ€ž=,iKi~ park. '~:. q i.=9/I'/-EE==: ~ 14-1,4462 l~ 4 Consider temporary closings of MacGregor Avenue if -m<,~ ~02-I.10/i'a'â€¢@C-5 c FT"-"- needed to accommodate special events. This would -,7.----~ also connect Bond Park to Town Hall and enhance the pedestrian experience. â€¢ If MacGregor Avenue is used for special events, plan for a decorative paving system, not just ~,--1.1 ~- ~--~~ asphalt. ....m./1 2,$ 4/* 1~~ 4 Maintain mountain views to the southwest and northeast. Figure 10: Examples of attractive .~0, Move intensive uses such as vendor tents off the turf /andscape treatments. areas to maintain the viability of the sod. Provide a permanent stage to reduce setup time and costs for Town Staff. Include dedicated areas for vendortents built-in tie-down anchors. Keep existing pedestrian patterns and crossing points on Elkhorn Avenue (for safety reasons). Preserve existing trees where possible, but not at the expense of good design. Accommodate the existing statues (Enos Mills) and monuments. Consider using the Virginia Street parking lot for Bond Park uses or events, if doing so enhances the plan. In order to define potential character giving elements and details that would be appropriate for Bond Park, a series of precedent images were assembled. These images consisted of design details and materials found in downtown Estes Park. During the Digital Design Charrette, the Stakeholder Committee designated the elements that they felt were most appropriate for Bond Park. The most popular precedent images are shown below. 3D DIGITAL DESIGN CHARRETTE The next step in the concept development process was a participatory design charrette with the Stakeholder Committee. This innovative design process was held in mid-August and utilized a 3D model of the park site and the immediate surroundings to develop and test arrangements of 3D program elements on the park site. The preliminary concepts developed during this charrette were based on the input from the public outreach process, the findings ~ 26~Â¥ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ****9 9 b * 7 Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued of the site analysis phase, the design precedents, and the Stakeholder's experience and knowledge of Estes Park. Because the concepts were developed in 3D, each participant was able to quickly comprehend spatial relationships and the scale of the resulting spaces created by the program elements. By the end of this day-long design workshop, four viable concepts were developed. The Master Plan Team then refined the four preliminary concept plans into three concept plans for Bond Park- Concepts A, B, and C. The refined concepts were presented to the Stakeholder Committee in mid-September. Their comments and suggestions were incorporated into the final Concepts A, B, and C, which were then presented to the public. It is important to note that the purpose of the three initial concept plans for Bond Park were to identify and test the best arrangement of the program elements on the park site. And, while the illustrative site plans and 3D models showed architectural detailing and materials, the final decisions on these design details for the park will typically be made as the construction documents are completed. CONCEPTS A, B, AND C The illustrative plans for Concepts A, B, and C presented to the community at the first public forum included color site plans and a 3D model. The colorsite plans forthe park included an illustration of a normal weekday (the Typical Configuration), a plan showing the park with vendor tents needed for large special events (the Event Configuration), as ~ well as plans illustrating the winter condition. PROGRAM ELEMENTS COMMON TO EACH CONCEPT Concepts A, B, and C share a number of common program elements. The design features common to each concept are: 4 The creation of paved areas to accommodate up to 100 vendor tents with the goal of maximizing green space and reducing compaction of the turf grasses. To accomplish this MacGregor Avenue would be paved with an accent paving system such as tinted concrete or unit pavers and temporarily closed during special events. The Town will need to replace the three MacGregor Avenue handicap spaces during the temporary closures, probably in the parking lot behind Town Hall. A plaza that would accommodate vendor tents during special events and an ice skating rink in the winter. The size and location of the plaza varies in each concept. A large open turf area in the center of the park. A stage that would be used for the performances associated with the special events. The size, location, and scale of the stage varies in the three concepts. There were a few comments during the public review questioning why each scheme included a stage when the Town already has a Performance Park. A stage is critical to a number of the special events currently being held in park and, since one of the primary objectives for the master plan is to accommodate the current uses, each plan includes this feature. b Gateways at the southwest and southeast corners of Elkhorn Avenue. The large shade trees in the southeast BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~27 * Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued corner were preserved in each case to create that gateway. A fire pit with seating. Opportunities for landscaping, shrub beds, and picnic groves. All of the monuments and statues currently found in Bond. Where possible, the monument would be left in the current location. If it is necessary to move to a statue or monument, a location would be found that offers similar characteristics as the current location. b While the concepts show different colors for paving, in most cases decisions regarding the actual paving material would be made at a more detailed level of design. In some concepts, sandstone paving is called out for important features, but primarily to indicate a desire to have these areas be enhanced with a rich paving material such as a natural stone. b The initial three concepts did not look at all aspects of Bond Park's special events programming. For instance, the details for accommodating a car show or fencing for fee-based / alcohol events were not examined in the three early concepts. It was assumed if 100 vendor tents could be accommodated, these other functions could be as well. These activities will be studied in more detail once the preferred plan is identified. & 30 Modeling. The images from the 3D models for Concepts A, B, and C are shown below the description of each concept. In addition, a CD will be included in the final report that includes a fly-through video of the full 3D model for each concept. 28~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN f * e Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued ~ CONCEPT A The goal for Concept A was to maximize the green space in the park (see illustrative plan on the next page). To accomplish this, the paved areas dedicated to vendor tents were pushed to the edges of the park. In addition to the common elements listed above, Concept A features: 4 A "Festival Promenade" along the west and north edges of the park. The promenade increases the width of existing 10'sidewalk to a point where vendor tents could be erected on decorative paving during special events. 4 In addition to enhancing the paving on MacGregor Avenue, the south parking spaces on Park Lane would receive a similar decorative paving treatment. Both MacGregor Avenue and the south parking bay would be closed during special event and used for event patron walking areas and/or vendor tents. 4 MacGregor Avenue is shown as a one-way north-bound street in this concept. This alleviates the problem of drivers trying to turn east on Elkhorn in heavy summer traffic. The existing splitter island in the northeast corner of the site is converted to plaza and absorbed into the park. The utility payment box and historic monument now located on the island would be relocated to other locations that would still allow them to server their current function. One advantage of closing the splitter island is that two to four additional parking spaces could be gained. 4 A small plaza in the northeast corner of the site. The plaza includes a fire pit with seating ring with curved benches. A A covered stage in shown in the northwest corner of the site. The stage would be raised and designed to look like a stone outcropping. A shade shelter would protect the performers during inclement weather and serve as a picnic shelter when not being used by performers during special events. A timber or peeled log gateway arch frames the southwest entry to the park and is set in a plaza with decorative paving. Picnic groves of shade trees are shown on the west and east edges of the park. The Elkhorn Avenue sidewalk is moved off the curb and into the park. A mixture of shrub beds and tree lawn is shown to buffer pedestrians from the heavy traffic on Elkhorn and to enhance the Elkhorn Avenue pedestrian experience. Special Event Configuration During special events, the vendor tents are placed on the MacGregor Avenue closure, in the northeast plaza, and in the festival promenade on the north and west edges of the park. 100 tents are accommodated in this configuration. This option has the added benefit of leaving the Town Hall bus drop off open at all times. Winter Condition In the winter configuration, an ice skating rink is shown on the turf along Elkhorn Avenue to increase visibility. This would allow any size rink to be constructed, but could adversely impact the sod if the turf is not fully dormant when ~ covered. Because the ice rink is shown on the turf, another benefit of this plan is that the northeast plaza would be available for other winter events. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .%29 ' I 42,1 ' 9.' 1./39.% I 4/ 4 i, 6% I / S -2,/ i (j 44 / 0 1 "m k L 1 // / - - J -- 27 A.,Lipecial Paving.7 ' 1 , 1 // tyâ‚¬/ Â£ / 4>' Â·v .1 alli \, ~ ~3 :4, V 4 J yg- , , Â·21:Jecial.- r + 1 .2 0,7 bil / ..,:/-Â«4 ~'~Â·' % h, Ovi 6 Sidewalk ~ , ~,~wn Hal~ Adjoining . / a - V ' :i Promenade iu Cn . f. ' i &'t .b 17 i ' ..41~ <43 arking .4 - :'' 10, ' ,: -~rj .4 1â€ž4 (Except during FirePit 49 11 special events) **81% i. Â· 7 -'--- 1->along - I < (Except during IÂ·Â·- ~ _~/'--71 Shrub/Perennial 1 2 4 5 pecial events} ' / - -1 Bed {7 , , L P. 'We ' .Tent Areat '' > N i'111 . > Soetial Ever,r. 57.1.14 - .-Afea * 4,/ \ te . Bus Drop-off U 11 1 f Festival ~ -- Promenade j b k -0 10~ Sidewalk Existing Cottonwoods Spec~ Paving ~Special Pav:ng ELKHORN AVENUE TImbe, Gateway Concept A Plan %54-- 49 0 10 20 40 ..rth 2 < / :5 k i 4 , 154**Â· .*.w ri - - . -99 r 10 I /06 - . 8 1. Al.: U. 1 3 t. Â· ,Â·''W,â€¢â€¢1 6 5 .2 7 , 'rl '4 1 * â‚¬ 1Â¢. 4>r 1 ';T',1111,'liLli 11 1 - 4 1x 4 Xyt . . 4,3.4% t --- 4.'.41 ,4 \ t-9Awl'T VS Tent Configuration During Special Events (+/- 100 rents) Winter 30/* BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued ~ CONCEPT B The overall organization of Concept B (see illustrative plan on the next page) is similar to Concept A, but there are a number of important differences: 4 The plaza in the northeast corner of the park is largerthan the plaza in Concept A to provide space for an informal ice rink. As with Concept A, the area occupied by the Park Lane/MacGregor Avenue splitter island has been absorbed into the park to maximize the paved area for special events. Once again the payment box and historic plague would be relocated. As with Concept A, two to four additional parking spaces could be created with the closure of the splitter island. 4 A tiered, natural stone seating area surrounds the fire pit to provide seating. This would create small amphitheater for small-scale performances such as the Cowboy Sing-Alongs. 4 A small water feature is shown in the center of plaza and part of the fire pit ring. This will provide summer activity for the plaza and the fire pit seating area. 4 MacGregor Avenue would receive a decorative paving treatment and be closed during special events. In this concept, MacGregor Avenue would remain a two-way street. The connection to Town Hall is enhanced with special paving and landscaping. & A diagonal sidewalk is shown running through the central lawn area to allow for the expected pedestrian movement from the Elkhorn Avenue / Park Lane intersection to northeast plaza. The walk bows to the south to maximize lawn seating for the stage. 4 A simple covered stage is shown in the northwest corner of the site. The stage structure shown in this concept is envisioned as peeled log or dimensional timber construction. Sidewalks provide access to the stage for equipment during the special event performances and for picnic supplies and coolers when it is used as a picnic shelter. 4 A natural stone seat wall, small plazas with seating boulders, and perennial beds are shown along Elkhorn Avenue. This creates an enhanced streetscape for the Elkhorn Avenue frontage and informal gathering places for park users and Elkhorn Avenue pedestrians. & Sandstone monoliths and decorative paving form the southwest gateway into the park while the southeast gateway is created by the large shade trees, accent paving, and a long, semi-circular bench located in the shade of the trees. A Shade trees are shown on the west, north, and east edges of the park to create picnic opportunities and a sense of enclosure for the central lawn area. Shrub beds are also shown on the north and west edges of the park to encourage use of the park's walkway system. Special Event Configuration Event tents are concentrated toward the northeast corner of the park, away from the Elkhorn Avenue traffic. The tents are shown on the temporary closure of MacGregor Avenue, the bus drop-off south of Town Hall, and the northeast plaza. A temporary closure of the bus drop-off is possible, but not desirable as the bus drop off would need to be accommodated in another location. One possibility is the parallel parking spaces on Elkhorn Avenue, which would - result in the temporary loss of up to six additional parking spaces. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~.131 Winter Condition A small, informal ice rink surrounds the fire pit area. This places the ice rink in close proximity to the fire pit, taking advantage of the natural linkage between the two uses. The irregular shape of the rink creates a "pond-like" setting for the skaters. This is the smallest of the rinks in the three concepts. ./ 11 -J* 11 ith / ,Â¢f .r" 22 - 41 1 . w Vn ht/Â« r U ''/ 1 45 14 11 1111~ f #0 I '*&\31Â« .. - Special Paing '\ b Irce Grates-t , 5 1 Sp..1.'J I g Tent Arra I Â· OcÂ·Â· >4.Â·-~In~1 in Â¥*}ter) -ift-// \</ , # fi Town H r A .'A ' r Â·Stone 2 LAN 1% A â„¢ r - & Shrub/Perennial ~~Â·, <r - ~ L Bed (typical) . .PÂ¢ U , '41~ ' -:. ' . ' f. 1 . Bus Drop-off ,.. - D,J,0, I - 5 2 d . â€ž ..11*' '1*'lili . 11 \ ,\, 40, Existing Cottonwoods -Special Paving / - m Gatpwaywith R / 1 - Stoneseatwall- " Stone Columns - " , 0 12=2~ r. 44.1/""/. Concept B Plan =Lf- O C 10 2 40 .Il VI:'Mt?t / 32e Skating / Apy: ~ r-F =""r-/*/ - ' L-~ A 1 11 ~2 Wt 4 S.9, 7- N~refI v,4,, tt . 64.7 Â¥ f ZVA L: f , *'44. Â· A* r 0-- f '* 4. 42 2 $ -Mn *- A__-Aâ‚¬"~ I,- Aill *54--< 4 \-Mit~ .......al.& \t'.43 ) AJ...0 - ..aâ‚¬. NTb Tent Configuration During Special Events (+/- 100 tents) Winter 32/e BOND PARK MASTER PLAN 3NV1 >48Vd Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued ~ CONCEPT C The premise for Concept C is to push Bond Park's active uses toward Elkhorn Avenue and create a quiet picnic grove / sculpture garden in the north half of the park (see illustrative plan on the next page). The unique features of Concept C include: 4 A plaza in the southeast corner of the park. This is the largest of the plazas shown in the concepts so it can accommodate the required number of tents and a larger ice rink. 4 An unbroken area of turf is shown in the center of the park to provide the maximum area for lawn seating for performances. & A fire pit with a seating ring in the northeast corner of the plaza, This portion of the plaza is paved with an accent paving material, setting it apart from the remainder of the plaza. The accent paving continues to Town Hall to highlight that important pedestrian connection and is also shown at the edges of the plaza. 4 MacGregor Avenue is shown as a two-way street in this concept and the splitter island is left in place. This will probably result in the loss of one or two parking spaces on MacGregor. 4 A water feature is located in the northwest corner of the park with a water course that winds its way to the south and then along Elkhorn Avenue. This is in response to suggestions offered in the focus groups for a significant water feature in the park. Shrub and perennial beds surround the water feature. A A combination gateway shelter and covered stage is located at the southwest corner of the park. A smaller stage is shown in the northwest corner for the smaller scale performances. aâ€¢ A large grove of shade trees occupies the north half of the park. Picnictables and art are intermingled with the trees to create a sculpture garden. The sculptures shown in the 3D model are placeholders that were readily available on-line and not suggestions for art for Bond Park. It is assumed the Town would carefully select sculptures that would be appropriate for Bond Park. Suggestions from the public included statues of important historic figures, wildlife, or whimsical sculptures. A A sidewalk is provided to carry pedestrians from the intersection of Virginia Drive and Park Lane to the southeast plaza. Special Event Configuration During special events, vendor tents are concentrated toward Elkhorn Avenue in Concept C to be in proximity to the highest level of pedestrian traffic. As with Concept B, tents are shown on the Town Hall bus drop-off, with the same impacts associated with a temporary closing found in Concept B. Winter Condition A 90' x 50' ice skating rink is located on the southeast plaza in this concept. This rink is similar in size to ones currently in operation in downtown Boulder and Longmont and the largest of the ice rinks shown in the three concepts. Placing the rink in this location allows it to be visible from Elkhorn Avenue and close to the fire pit. BOND PARK MASTER PLANI ~33 A - "prl ... \ . ...1 . 4 / 1 0 lai 14 / 1 1 g & i.,4 21 9 7. 7 P ra f.jIL + 3 L Special.aving 9,9 1, Town Hall'I~ '~, Parking , 0. 0 (Except during f, \ 4 special events) Â· \ \ . Shrub/Perer.nial & Bed (typical) .- p .a .i:D / .$11 4:3 * Fire Pitwith Sandstone 1 Seat Boulders ev V Sandstone Border ' -- ' . j. Bus Drop-off , LTent)'Spe:*1 Event A,60 -' N 4 (Ice R'knkin Winter) >2\ i 9.-/Â·IVIJ Â·Â·. Ber}% .r -â€¢ 7. - Existing Cottomoods ~ - Special Paving ~tage .. ORN AVEN - U Special 1-~* -.-- ....fr ~ ~Paving *> Â£040 r L.,6 **Â£ *6 --,-- Concept C Plan 22-4-- * 0 10 20 40 North 107 6 24. Â«%- ' . 4 ..1 v \ , j. , .1 -@& XED W 9 -11 1 1, ~. /--3232/~0 , 4 7 i 0.0 * A"Flijfuj- Aill//11'll'lli.....fok/prV 7 / .1,WA,1.. Tears ,<77 ..Ye f U. 7 k. s. 1 16Â¥f A ~Ice Skating 4 - Rink ; < t.dill--Mejil-V~J /96* 19 / /%4 -- ,-Â· 4% 1- -/AÂ£ 4 9* 4 eifty -Â»,Â§>d 4444/"/7/F~y-k . $ %g* // * *L-- i,i :31< f.* .20/I./blg*'"Il- .% Winter N,5 Tent Configuration During Special Events (+/- 100 rents) 34~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Preliminary Master Plan Concepts, continued PUBLIC REVIEWS AND PREFERENCE VOTING Concepts A, B, and C were brought before the community in a number of ways: A review by the Stakeholder Committee. Public Forum #1. A display in Town Hall for Town employees. A display in a Bond Park vendor tent during the Labor Day Craft show. On-line review of the three concepts posted on the project web site. The on-line voting was opened to the public immediately following Public Forum #1 on September 2nd and kept open through the end of the month. At each event and via the web site review, individuals had an opportunity to review the three concepts, vote for the conceptthey preferred, and offer written comments and suggestions. The Public Outreach section of this report summarizes the central themes of the comments received at each of these venues. However, since there where literally hundreds of written comments and suggestions, it is not possible to provide a detailed summary here. Please see the Appendix for a complete summary of the comments received at each event and the on-line review. CONCEPT PREFERENCE VOTING By the time each of the reviews were complete, a total of 588 votes were received regarding the community's choice for a preferred concept. When the votes were totaled, there was only a 5% difference between the first place Concept B (35.2%) and third place Concept A (30.1%). In addition, the preferred concept varied from event to event. This level of voluntary involvement in the master plan process is unusual and demonstration of the community's commitment to the master plan process. The table below provides a detailed breakdown of the voting from each event. Since this was not a statistically valid survey (e.g. there was no way to control the number of times an individual voted), these results should be considered advisory. The result of this process could be interpreted a number of ways, but when the voting is compared to the written comments, it seems safe to say the community felt the three concepts were all viable options and that they often had a difficult time choosing one concept over another. Many individuals voted for a particular concept and then suggested adding a feature from another concept, or deleting a feature from their preferred concept. Table 4: Itable headingl PUBLIC TOWN STAFF LABOR DAY ONLINE TOTAL FORUM # 1 REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW Concept A 14 9 98 56 177 Concept B 4 3 133 67 207 Concept C 12 15 129 48 204 BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .435 9***9, Page intentionally left blank 367-~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN - CHAPTER 5 PREFERRED CONCEPT PLAN With the completion of the public outreach process and the reviews of the concept plans, the Master Plan Team began the process of developing a Preferred Concept Plan for Bond Park. This process relied heavily on the input from the community as well as the guidance of the Stakeholder Committee and Town Staff. STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE REVIEWS In mid-September, the Master Plan Team met with the Stakeholder Committee to review the input from the public, the preliminary results of the preference voting, and the strengths and weaknesses of each concept. The Stakeholders worked to carefully balance the community's preferences and concerns against the design parameters and overall goals for the Master Plan. Ultimately, the group reached consensus on the features they felt the preferred plan should include. POIN-rS OF CONSENSUS The Stakeholder Committee agreed the goal should be to develop a hybrid plan reflecting the wishes of the community and incorporating the best features of Concepts A, B, and C. The primary areas of agreement were: 4 Include Concept A's event tent layout which featured the "Festival Promenade" and keep the bus drop-off free of vendor tents to allow it to function normally at all times. A Incorporate an ice rink as an important winter activity. The rink should use natural ice (not synthetic) and be mechanically chilled to maintain ice quality. ae Use the plaza location shown in Concept A, but enlarge it to accommodate more event tents and an ice rink the size of the rink shown in Concept C. ae Include the fire pit configuration from Concept B but adapt it to the larger plaza. Look at adding a shade structure over the fire pit area to provide protection from rain during the Cowboy Sing Alongs and shelter from the winter winds for ice skating. Add the diagonal sidewalk from Concept B, but look for ways tb soften edges and reduce the arc of the walk. Include Concept B's Elkhorn Avenue seating plazas, perennial beds and stone seatwalls. Make MacGregor Avenue a one-way, north-bound street to eliminate the problem created by drivers trying to turn east on Elkhorn from MacGregor. 4 Include a rock outcrop stage in northwest (similar to that shown Concepts A and C). Add a seasonal tent-like shade structure that could be erected by Town Staff and then taken down when no longer needed. 4 Add a small water feature in the northwest corner similar to that shown in Concept C but without the water BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~37 * 9 1, Preferred Concept Plan, continued course. b Include Concept C's gateway shelter but without the stage function. b ' Find places for play elements for small children (e.g. play sculptures). b Find appropriate locations for the statues and monuments currently located in Bond Park. PREFERRED PLAN DEVELOPMENT * Following the points of consensus defined by the Stakeholder Committee, the Master Plan Team set out to create a draft of the Preferred Plan for Bond Park. This plan synthesized the best features from the preliminary concepts into one plan. In early October, the draft plan was brought before the Stakeholder Committee for a final review prior to its presentation at Public Forum #2. There wer@ only minor changes suggested for the site plan,Â·but there was discussion related to policy issues. 5, The Town needed to create an off-site location for the vendor vehicles (especially large vans and trucks) and adopt a policy limiting vendor parking in the immediate vicinity of Bond Park. This may also require providing a shuttle service to the off-site parking area. b There was agreement that the Town needed to formally adopt a policy to limit the size of the events in Bond Park so that they do not exceed the scale of the events currently held,there. ap The group wanted to make it clear that this project will need to be phased and constructed with available funding sources and grants. 4 If the project was phased, there needed to be design standards in place to assure continuity of the design details and finishes from phase to phase. 4 There was less consensus within the group regarding the water feature. Some questioned the need for a water feature given that there are already a number in town, the initial capital cost, conflicts with wildlife, and on-going maintenance costs. POLICY |SSUES EVENT USE IN THE PARK - . The presence of community events in Bond Park is ah important part of thf park's history and stakeholders have evidenced through public forums and survey results that they would like events to be a part of the park's future as well. However, there were many comments indicating concern over "how" the park is programmed with events, particularly noting concern over the fact that currently several existing Bond Park events seem to overburden the park and the set-up of these events is sometimes more detrimental than beneficial to the business community. To alleviate these issues going forward and to ensure that successful events can continue and be hosted in a manner that supports the Downtown business district and the community, it is recommended the Town adopt the follpwing policy issues in relation to events in Bond Park: 2, Event Set-Up: The Bond Park Master Plan prescribes an event set-up that keeps tents and exent traffic on hard surfaces and preserves grassy areas for open uses and seating for performances. All event users 38g~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Preferred Concept Plan, continued should be required to set-up according to the prescribed event set-up standards laid out in this plan to avoid damaging fragile park surfaces in the future. 4 Event Size: Events and performances in Bond Park should be limited to those hosting 100 tents or less in an effort to avoid overburdening the park. Events that require more tenting or larger areas than those prescribed by the event set-up plans will be referred to other event areas in the town, including the Fairgrounds or Performance Park. 4 Vendor Parking: Off-site vendor parking for all events held at Bond Park will be required by event organizers. Currently, vendors at Bond Park events are allowed to park immediately adjacent to the park to easily access their merchandise. However having 100 tented vendors in the park generates demand for some 200 parking spaces, thereby taking away from consumer parking for downtown businesses and event attendees. Best practices research from surrounding communities who host events shows a standard practice of requiring event producers to require off-site vendor parking. The Town can work with event producers to identify locations for this parking, which may include the Fairgrounds. The event organizer will be responsible for the cost of providing transportation to and from Bond Park and the offsite parking location, if deemed necessary. i> Accommodate Handicapped Parking: Temporary closure of MacGregor Avenue for events will also block off close-in handicapped accessible parking for event-goers. The Town will need to work with event organizers to ensure handicapped accessible parking spaces are allocated in the set-up plan for each event. 4 Sound Regulations: Many business and community members noted issues with sound coming from the events held in the park, particularly in the later evening hours. Most communities have sound ordinances limiting decibel levels and decreasing them particularly as the evening wears on. Estes Park should consider enacting sound regulations for events to alleviate this event issues between organizers and the community. The Town of Estes Park should consider develop a special events policy that outlines all the specific guidelines for event development in Estes Park, and specifically in Bond Park, to clarify and simplify the event development process. YEAR-RouND ACTIVATION Bond Park is heavily used and programmed throughout spring, summer and fall in Estes Park, but in the winter, the park goes dark and stays that way. There are no events and no programming to activate the space, and so the park remains an underutilized and non-activated major parcel of property in the middle of a busy downtown business district. Activating the space in the winter will not only bring new life to a now-dark corner of downtown, it will draw new activity and perhaps new visitors to downtown businesses at a time they haven't traditionally visited. Activating Bond Park and giving locals and visitors a reason to come downtown during the winter months should encourage them to stay and frequent the shops and restaurants that surround the park. One primary idea for winter activation emerged during the Bond Park Master Plan process - an ice skating rink. A rink would be a more permanent programming fixture in the park during the winter months, while some other suggested events could enhance the environment created by the rink. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .29 Preferred Concept Plan, continued |CE SKATING The Bond Park Master Plan design process revealed strong interest from the community in creating space for an ice- skating rink in the park. The final plan features a plaza that can host a rink up to 4,500 square feet in size. The rink has not been designed as a permanent, built-in feature of the park; rather it's featured as an optional element that can be added as desired in the coming years, pending funding and community demand. There are two distinct options for how the Town could approach installation and management of an ice rink in Bond Park - contracting the entire installation and management out to a concessionaire, or purchasing all the equipment and materials and managing the rink locally. The following outlines details, including pros and cons, of each: Contract for Installation and Management There are several concessionaires across the country that professionally install and manage complete ice rink systems from the rink itself down to the skates. A community can contract with these individuals to do all or pieces of the management of an ice rink operation and have them competitively bid against each other for the best price. The contractor is paid a set fee for the comprehensive management of the rink based on agreed upon parameters (see the Appendix for an example of an ice rink contract RFP from the Bayside District). The Town or contracting organization is obligated to pay these funds to the contractor. Revenues are generated to pay these fees through a variety of means, including: Ice skating ticket sales Skate rental fees Sponsorships for the rink Concession sales Ticketing prices are set based upon overall costs and what the Town feels the community can bear. Best practices show that organizations are generally able to cover their costs for rink operations through these means. Purchase the Equipment and Manage Locally Self-managing an ice-rink is a major undertaking requiring an investment in not only the rink materials, dashers boards, and chillers, but also a zamboni and skates for rentals. Additionally, the Town would need to ensure it had staff capacity to provide the set-up and day-to-day management and maintenance of the rink itself. Ultimately, ownership of a rink will decrease the yearly investment cost in contracting and management and could over time cause the rink to become a revenue generator for the Town. 40~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Preferred Concept Plan, continued In the first year, the Master Plan Team recommends the Town consider contracting the entire ice rink installation and management to a professional concessionaire to get a sense of the demand for and interest in ice skating in Bond Park. This allows the Town to avoid a large capital investment up-front in materials and provides an opportunity to test the waters before making a full commitment. If the ice rink is successful, the long-term recommendation is for the town to make the capital investment in the ice rink system so that over time, the Town can generate more revenue from the ice rink operations. Best practices research from other communities found that economically it makes sense to buy an ice rink system rather than rent if the community plans to use the rink over a five year or longer term. SUPPORT OTHER WINTER USES In addition to the ice skating rink, the redesign of Bond Park allows for the opportunity to create more events and programming year-round, particularly in winter. The ice rink will create tremendous activity on its own, and the fire pit provides a warm go-to place for downtown visitors. Other activities that should be considered to program the park space and activate the downtown environment include: ae Town of Estes Park Holiday Tree Lighting: Public outreach revealed that the community truly sees Bond Park as the community gathering place and would like to see it programmed that way as much as possible. Currently, the downtown merchants work with the Town on creating a festive environment for holiday shoppers, but there is no community event that brings residents together. A holiday tree lighting in the middle of Bond Park, complete with a visit from Santa and carolers and other activities for families would be a 6 great way to let residents enjoy "their" Bond Park. 4 Ice Sculpting: Ice sculpting events are growing in popularity all over the country as an event idea that draws out the locals on cold winter days and brings visitors to the community too. Both community artists and visiting sculptors can be invited to turn blocks of ice into art throughout and around the park, and into the downtown business district too. Visitors could be invited to judge the best sculptures, and other interactive and hands-on activities for families could be incorporated as well. &0 Holiday Markets: Holiday markets are wonderful events that would allow the craftsmen and women that already display their wares in Bond Park during the warmer months to come and sell their goods during the winter months just in time for Holiday gifts. The Preferred Plan for the park allows for greater usability in the colder months, and a holiday market would welcome traditional craftsman along with some family holiday activities to Bond Park to augment the holiday shopping season downtown. These are just a handful of ideas that could be developed. The demand for winter activities exists according to the outreach conducted as part of the Bond Park Master Plan process, and the Town should work with local event organizers to explore options. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~ 1 I * Preferred Concept Plan, continued HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PREFERRED-PLAN The Preferred Plan was presented to the public on October 8th at the second Public Forum (right). This plan is a direct result of the community input and master plan process and reflects the points of consensus defined by the Stakeholder Committee. The Preferred Plan includes. /b. A central green space which includes a large area of open turf in the center of the park. The lawn area is surrounded by shrub beds and perennial beds to reduce water usage and add seasonal color. aÂ· Gateways on Elkhorn Avenue at the southwest and southeast corners of the park. â€¢ The southwest gateway feature; a small plaza and a gateway shelter. The shelter will frame the Park Lane and Elkhorn Avenue intersection, provide a meeting place in the downtown, and offer refuge during rain storms. â€¢ The southeast gateway takes advantage of the large existing cottonwood trees and maintains the existing planters at the corner. A new plaza is added to the northwest along with a long custom bench in the shade of the trees. 4 Curb and gutter has been eliminated on MacGregor Avenue and the south-side parking bay of Park Lane so they can be closed to traffic and converted to pedestrian/vendor tent areas during special events. These two areas will be paved with decorative concrete or, budget allowing, a modular brick or concrete unit paving system. â€¢ Since thie curb and gutter will be eliminated, the parking spaces will be defined by decorative concrete bollards. The bollards will include electrical receptacles to make power available for the vendor tents. b MacGregor Avenue is shown as a one-way north-bound street to eliminate south-bound traffic conflicts at Elkhorn Avenue. 4* A plaza in the northeast corner of the park. The northwest plaza is designed to accommodate vendor tents during special events and an informal ice rink. The plaza is,shown with brick or concrete unit pavers and a natural sandstone margin. & A fire pit surrounded by tiered, natural stone seating on the west side of the northwest plaza. A shade structure over the fire pit area provides a rain shelter in the summer months and, with the addition of fabric panels on the west side of the shelter, screening from winter winds. 4 A permanent stage in the northwest corner of the park constructed from native boulders and a concrete deck. During the summer months, the stage would be covered by a removable tent structure to provide shelter for the performers. The stage would include all the necessary electrical systems required for special event performances. , 4 A small water feature is shown on either side of the stage. Placing the water feature in this location means it can take advantage of the two to three foot elevation change in the area to create small water falls that would be visible from Elkhorn Avenue. The water feature would be shut down when the stage is in use. 4 Sidewalks on the west and east side are widendd to accommodate pairs of 10' x 10' vendor tents and the associated pedestrian circulation (the Festival Promenade). The tent areas are designated by decorative brick or concrete paving and framed by shade trees in tree grates. 42, BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Preferred Concept Plan, continued & A diagonal walkway ~ 1 --7 ~.,- connects the southwest . entry plaza with the , 7- Baraid 11~ -3 //30 -ted / Monume~it ' 1' .' (Typ) ~ 02 1-Grate or Raised - northeast plaza and /61 I .1.21,94 - 2 .....Ill. 7V ma- *p* a 4pz evell) 4 T kiduring Town Hall. The walkway --. ~ / Fire Pit in nered -1 ,&. Untedi , curves to the southeast Scored/ 4 , 4 AClA/;9 ' - Coi=ete to accommodate lawn pxr %94 3& < '1)â‚¬7-~4/ I f ACLent Paving \ seating for the stage. C w/ / u 3 Â»1 1 1 L ' \ 6 ~ 6'Sidewalk f 62' I, F I -ptarileF, Fo!. , 1 . -Pr~ 1 It\ 40 . / The Preferred Plan also 7,)wri Hall shows the idea of using "'Ling 4, t'* 1 : ,- ke Rink /,/ I tk' 4 .-(WinteÂ¢, 1 -= ie Chitler/./ j this walk as an historic ,~speclatevents) U 1, Skate Rental, /11 6 (Eicept dueng Me<hancal and , Shrub/ . . Br:,4=. 4,2i or wildlife "learning uÂ·===#,Pefennidl Bed 4, Epo:Â·Milb , A I'le 10. i,1,â€¢cl' 9[u41 ~~ Â· walk" W hcnk i : '' t ''f gess A.' 1 M , *139 IlemrÂ·Â·Â·:able ~ .be The Enos Mills sculpture 3 2 , , Â· L Tent Area; ......~ . %-i ITC Â· ' Ipld'enÂ·sÂ· 4 A 5:*ial Even, 'h, 4 has been move 50' Â¢ H t. 2 -Â·,Nâ€¢ter -Â·.71 Fg i' Red 1 Feature Â·: ' * 2/Il'~Ule'~ ; .. 4 ,' BusDrop-off/ ~ southwest to a small . Piomenade 3 Â·n}th 8 , I '1.: i X ~e Vendor Shutlte Fes/val - 8 %'de . ,/, Drop-off --J C P... . NL With Accent \ sandstone plaza at tpaÂ¥,4 \ Ed * I j:,4-4, ti' . ./ ...L,-* .' Cori + I ... the intersection of the il--Ex'ing Cottonwoods diagonal walkway and - j \ Ar't Opportunity - .2 the northeast plaza. Iiii Accent 36#091)? ,% PavIng 4% 1 41*01/. 1....r ELKHORN AVENUE This is a highly visible, . prominent location within the park and Preferred Concept 2-2--_-~ 49 will allow the statue to maintain its current Figure 11: Preferred Concept Plan. orientation to Longs Peak. â€¢ It is assumed that other existing monuments/plaques will be relocated within the park. *b# A natural stone seatwall framed by colorful perennial beds is shown along Elkhorn Avenue. The wall will be constructed in segments to allow pedestrian movement into the park and facilitate drainage. â€¢ A small plaza with sandstone paving is shown in the center of wall, providing opportunities for additional seating and art. 4 Views are maintained to the businesses north of Park Lane by aligning trees in linear groups to create view corridors. A picnic grove is created on the east side of the park with shade trees. A children's play sculpture is shown in the center of the grove. 4 A small building would house the skate rental / hot chocolate concession and the mechanical equipment for the ice rink is shown just south of the northeast plaza. 4 The Preferred Plan assumes the log Visitor Information building will be relocated to another location in town. It may be possible to keep the structure in the park use it during the winter as an interim building for ice skate rentals and hot chocolate. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Â¥~43 Page intentionally left blank 44/. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN I CHAPTER 6 FINAL MASTER PLAN The adopted Master Plan for Bond Park is the culmination of an exhaustive public involvement process and careful planning by the Stakeholder Committee, Town Staff, and the Master Plan Team. The plan is a direct reflection of the comments and suggestions offered by the residents of Estes Park throughout the master plan process. The Board of Trustees is prepared to implement the recommendations of the master plan as funding becomes available. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE FINAL MASTER PLAN The final Master Plan for Bond Park has been designed to meet the long-term needs of Estes Park's downtown and the wide range of events hosted in the park. The plan has been developed with sustainability and user comfort in mind. It features a carefully planned landscape along with opportunities for seating, shade, picnicking, and warmth. The approved Master Plan proposes significant enhancements to the appearance of Bond Park with the addition of ~ new shrub beds and perennial beds, decorative paving that makes use of natural stone and durable modular paving systems, natural stone walls, and landscape boulders. The plan carries forward almost all of the improvements included in the Preferred Plan described above. The adopted Master Plan: A Maximizes and protects Bond Park's green space. The usable area for Bond Park has been expanded by at least 30% in the Master Plan. This will enhance the sustainability of the park's landscape while still accommodating the current special event schedule. This expansion includes MacGregor Avenue and the south bay of parking on Park Lane. It is further enhanced by the creation of a new plaza in the northeast corner of the park. The plaza incorporates the Park Lane / MacGregor Avenue splitter island and turn lane into the park as part of the plaza. 4 Enhances the character ofthe park. Because of Estes Park's position as one of the most visited resort communities in the country, it is critical its public spaces be attractive, comfortable places with appropriate materials and finishes. The Master Plan meets this goal by providing well appointed places for people to sit and gather, by adding shelters to provide a refuge from sun or inclement weather, by including shrub beds with attractive native plantings and flowering perennials, and by proposing attractive durable materials. 4 Improves the function of the park and reduces maintenance. There are a number of enhancements suggested for the Master Plan not shown in an illustrative plan. These upgrades will reduce long-term maintenance costs and improve the function of the park. â€¢ Eliminating the curb and gutter in MacGregor Avenue and the south Park Lane parking bay and raising the street/parking 6" to sidewalk grade. This allows these two areas to function as a road and parking spaces during the typical weekday and then as public plazas with no tripping hazards when they are temporarily closed during special events. Since there will be no curb, these areas will be defined by changes in BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~145 Final Master Plan, continued pavement color and texture, striping, and concrete bollards. Storm drainage will be accommodated via ~ sheet flow or "V" pans. â€¢ Upgrading the electrical infrastructure to better support special events. This includes incorporating receptacles into the bollards used to define the parking spaces. Receptacles in the bollards will provide power to the vendor tents without the need for long extension cords. â€¢ Installing permanent tie-down rings for vendor tents into the paving. â€¢ Enhancingthe turf grasses by increasingthe slope and/or adding soil amendmentsto reduce compaction and subdrains to improve drainage. Other design features included in the Master Plan include: b The majority of the park is left as green space / landscape. This includes a large area of turf in the center of the park which is surrounded by colorful, low-water-use shrub and perennial beds. 4 Gateways on Elkhorn Avenue at the southwest and southeast corners of the park. â€¢ The southwest gateway features a small plaza and a gateway shelter. The gateway shelter includes benches and would mark the entry into Bond Park. It would help frame the Park Lane and Elkhorn Avenue intersection - providing a visible meeting place in the downtown and offering refuge during afternoon rain storms. â€¢ The southeast gateway preserves the large existing cottonwood trees and maintains the existing streetscape improvements and planters at the corner. A new plaza is shown on the northwest side along 1 with a long custom bench under the shade of the trees. 4 MacGregor Avenue is shown as a one-way street to eliminate the problem with vehicles turning east on to Elkhorn off MacGregor during heavy summertraffic. 4 MacGregor Avenue and the south-side parking bay of Park Lane are shown as tinted concrete with decorative scoring so these areas can be converted to pedestrian/vendor tent areas during special events. These two areas could be paved in a number of materials, depending on budget and the desired life-cycle. Paving options include standard concrete with decorative scoring, concrete or clay brick unit pavers, or even a permeable concrete unit paving systems that absorbs storm runoff into a gravel subbase. Traffic cones would be set up by Town Staff prior to the event to close these areas to vehicles. A An events plaza in the northeast corner of the park. This northwest plaza is approximately 13,500 SF so it can accommodate vendor tents during special events and a informal ice rink. The plaza is shown with brick or concrete unit pavers and a natural sandstone margin. 4 A fire pit surrounded by tiered, natural stone seating on the west side of the northwest plaza. Tiered seating will create a small performance space -- primarily for the Cowboy Sing-alongs. A shade structure is shown overthe fire pit to provide a rain shelter in the summer months and a wind shelter during the winter. Adding fabric wind screen panels between columns on the north and west side of the shelter would be needed to create the winter wind screen. A permanent stage in the northwest corner of the park. The stage would be constructed from native boulders and have the look of a natural rock outcropping. It would have a concrete deck and be covered by removable tent structure that would provide shelter for the performers. The tent structure would either be erected by Town Staff at the beginning of the summer season and removed in the fall or erected just prior to ~ 46~,~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Final Master Plan, continued performances. The stage would include all the necessary electrical systems. b A small water feature is shown on either side of the stage. Placing the water feature in the northwest corner of the park means the water feature can take advantage of the two to three foot elevation change in that area. This way small water falls can be created that would be visible from Elkhorn Avenue. The water feature would need to be shut down when the stage is in use. 4 The sidewalks on the west and east side of Bond Park are widened to accommodate pairs of 10' x 10' vendor tents along with the associated pedestrian circulation. The tent area is designated by accent paving and shade trees in tree grates are shown between each pair of tents. 4 A diagonal walkway connects the southwest Elkhorn Avenue entry plaza with the northeast plaza and Town Hall. The walkway has a slight curve to southeast accommodate lawn seating for the stage. The plan also shows the idea of usingthis walk as an historic or wildlife "learning walk". am The Enos Mills sculpture is shown within a small sandstone plaza at the intersection of the diagonal walkway and the northeast plaza. This is a highly visible, prominent location within the park and will allow the statue to maintain its current orientation to Longs Peak. The statue and base will need to be well protected prior to being moved so it can be relocated without being damaged. It is assumed that locations for Bond Park's other monuments/plaques will be determined as more detailed designs are completed in future. 4 A natural stone seatwall framed by colorful perennial beds is shown along Elkhorn Avenue. The wall will be constructed in segments to allow pedestrian movement into the park and facilitate drainage. A small plaza with sandstone paving is shown in the center of wall, providing opportunities for additional seating and art. 4 Maintaining views to the businesses north of Park Lane by minimizing the number of shade trees on the north side of the park and aligning trees in groups to create views to the businesses. 4 Shade trees on the east edge of the turf area are used to create a picnic grove. In addition to picnic tables, the Master Plan shows a children's play sculpture at the center of the picnic grove. This could be a catalog play sculpture or a custom art installation. The play sculpture is shown within an area of resilient surfacing to meet current safety standards. A Three handicap parking spaces are shown on the east side of MacGregor Avenue. During special events, these spaces will be replaced in the main parking lot behind Town Hall. 4 A small building is shown just south of the northeast plaza. This building would house the skate rental / hot chocolate concession and the mechanical equipment for the ice rink. 4 The log Visitor Information building is not shown in Bond Park in the final Master Plan. It is assumed it will be relocated to another location in town. One suggestion was to move the structure to a location just south of the northeast plaza and use it during the winter as an interim facility for ice skate rentals and hot chocolate until a permanent structure is built, orthe Town determines thatthe ice rink is not feasible in Estes Park. 4 Because this is a master plan, formal designs have not been completed for any of the buildings or shelters shown in the park. These structures would be designed during the construction document phase of the park's re-design. However, the design intent established in this master plan is to have carefully designed structures that do not block off-site views (e.g. Longs Peak), reflect the architectural character of Estes Park and the mountain setting, and meet the programmatic needs of the park. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .97 6% 0 , f A /,11'N y ..111, 1// : 94/J' r- Bollard X~2nt-4k <4 v**W / / (Typ) * - 1/& 1/ Tree Grate or Raised - 4, . . arldng *. Planter (Typ) 1 (Except during speci events) /4ire pit in Tiered n / 7. & Seating Area Under Â£4- Lrinted/-12 " ~ Shelter 2 , ./1 . . f i 1. i ..,lili - Scored i , Concrete ,x //f,/ 2 / 1 2 ~ 1 Accent Paving 1 49 . i 3 / / r \ 4 , t--Planters/Pots-~ ' ..i~ //2 2 / 60 Sidewalk L P ' (Summe 14% i Adjoining Town Hall 1 4 Promenade 60\ 0 /7 / r j - $ I i r-- Ice Rink < 4 {finte> , & _ Ice Chiller/. ' / 1. 4/ Mechanical and ~ (Except during ~. 9 Â· ~-Vate Renta[/ 41+ special events) , 1 - Refreshment ~ ' L Bunding Shrubi .0 - Re L:==m~~~~ial Bed ~ fx 4 one , .,11, r95 - 4 -, '1 4\139 ,- 3 x â€ž f mov \ .' 1 1- i.1 elt I, a Tent Areal -1 4-- MK -/ 4 'A I. - i WrerÂ¢E--1 + . 4 94 Area ./- 1 -- Special Event 4 7~ bllia , Water Ule . 1 r s/Bus Drop-off/ Feature .3 / Vendor Shuttle Â· I 8' Sidewalk - ' --1 - L :.1 '. P Dro~wil ~ Festival -- with Sandston .3 ' 18" Seatwal . C 8 Promenade , Pavers . .,. N~ With Accent Â· ~Paving J , 21 16 / #42 '5tone -,1 ' ng with \ % .r' 4- - - Boulder.1- . P 1. Existing Cottonwoods ~ ' 1 7 2 1 . \ An Opportunity \ 4. 1 I # Accent * h. 6\ AVENUE - Paving 3%Q X . 52-)*M /.-~I.Ip- Entry Shelter EX-KH ~ting $Â« 1, *: - 14 , -d,16' Figure 12: Recommended Master Plan and 30 Model Bird's Eye View from southwest corner. j h 48< BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Special Event Configuration ~ During special events, many of the hardscape areas are utilized for vendor tents or car displays. Vendor tents are typically shown in groups of four with assumption that the two exposed sides of the tents would be open. Permanent tie-down rings would be provided in the pavement at each tent corner. A The "Festival Promenade" from Concept A is included in the Master Plan creating space for up to 14 vendor tents between street trees along the west and north edge of the park. This configuration encourages pedestrians to cross Elkhorn or Park Lane and entices them to continue north along the promenade. This brings festival patrons in close proximity of the Park Lane businesses. 4 Room of an additional 28 vendor tents is provided in the northeast plaza. These would be in close proximity to the fire pit and its shelter. ae Another 58 vendor tents can be accommodated on the MacGregor Avenue closure, 15' is provided between the tents area to allow room for pedestrian circulation. In addition, because the curb and gutter has been eliminated, the tents can face in any direction. - 11 . r / 4 4 1 1 1 11 <. 04 4 + 6. \ 1 t . /4 , I u. A v \Â» A /1 i. . ) ~ :d * /-<-- . + i - . A / # E ft I / 1 ./ I Figure 13: Special Event y k i Configuration for the / 21 1~= Recommended Master Plan. - 4-* ' 1, 11 , 1 711,1 - 4. 1 11111 1 ' 46 & . "/,2 - ; Cc- 'lilli -t===5= it 0 1, , -210 i 44, 'lt 2 -j . ../ .17 1.- 11'lil Idil .1, 6.11 - \ - 1 --. .#Â»4 W- \ \ & m 4 41(4. \ . .fr uobsÂ» -..Il *4~~wiv ~,w ~~~% ~~ ~- BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .%49 W Final Master Plan, continued Winter Condition An area for a 90' x 50' ice skating rink is shown in the northeast plaza in the Master Plan. Placing the rink in this location allows it to be in a quiet area of the park, away from Elkhorn Avenue, but in close proximity to the fire pit and wind shelter. The slope of the plaza paving will need to be designed to accommodate the ice rink. It is assumed the rink will be chilled with an ice making system that is installed in late fall and removed when no longer needed. A small structure is shown just south of the plaza that would house the chilling equipment and to serve as the skate rental and refreshment center when the rink is in use. Night lighting will need to be provided if the rink is to be used after sunset. Today's lighting systems offer very low impact fixtures with little of no glare or off-site impact. RESEARCH / ANALYSIS ON MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS In an effort to identify the issues associated with the redevelopment of Bond Park, the Master Plan Team completed research on a number of potential park elements and systems. This ranged from turf systems, to ice skating, to vendor tent tie down rings. A brief overview of the findings of this research includes: TURF SYSTEMS There are a wide range of options for enhancing the durability of turf grasses in Bond Park. A Synthetic turf systems were mentioned as a possible solution for the turf problems in Bond Park. At this time, ~ this option is not recommended, partly due to cost ($8.00 to $10.00 / SF) but also due the fact that wildlife use Bond Park and synthetic turf seemed inconsistent with Estes Park's character and natural setting. b Standard turf systems (organic soil amendments tilled into the soil prior to seeding or sodding) are cost effective ($0.50 to $1.50 / SF). However, they will probably not hold up to the level of use the turf in Bond Park sees -- even if the vendor tents and car displays are moved off the turf. A standard turf system may be feasible if the slope for the turf area is increased to at least 2% (2' of fall for every 100') and the grass is given adequate time to establish before being used (sometimes as long a as a full growing season). 2> A modified turf system is recommended and included in the current opinion of probable cost for Bond Park. This approach includes a careful analysis of the existing soils, creating a consistent slope for the turf areas of at least 1.75%, adding a mix of soil amendments and sand to site soils to improve drainage, and adding subdrains approximately every 12'. At $3.50 TO $4.50 / SE this system is not as expensive as sand-based turf systems like the Broncos or Rockies use, but should resolve the current drainage problems and withstand heavy use. One potential area of concern is that the turf subdrains will need a place to drain and there are no storm drains in the streets near Bond Park. Additional engineering studies will be needed to address this issue. WATER FEATURES The general public loves water features. Water features add color and movement to a space, reflect light, provide white noise, and are inviting to play in. From a management and design standpoint there are a number of aspects 50~3~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Final Master Plan, continued related to water features that must be evaluated before including one in a public project. Some of the most important aspects to consider are: b Many health departments are requiring that new water features be designed with water treatment systems on par with public swimming pools. This is a based on the assumption that people will interact with the water and water-borne diseases cannot be ruled out. In Estes Park there is the additional concern created by wildlife coming in contact with the water. The need for filtration and water treatment adds an additional level of capital cost and on-going maintenance for a water feature. 4 The pumping systems for water features often require daily maintenance (clean filters and screens, remove trash and leaf litter, etc.). Replacement of worn out parts such as pumps needs to also be planned for in long- range budgets. A Water proofing must be carefully designed for water features. Water proof membranes and subdrain systems are not unusual. Even with careful planning and design, leaks are possible which can be difficult to repair. ICE RINK DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Additional research will be needed before completing detailed designs for the ice rink area. The amount of slope the northeast plaza will need to drain in the summer months may need to be balanced against the need to have a level area for the ice rink. The ice rink in downtown Boulder uses Styrofoam sheets of different thickness to create a level ~ area for its ice rink, which is on a sloped plaza. If the Town decides to purchase an ice rink, the ice chilling system will also need to be carefully specified to meet the Town's needs and environmental conditions. Natural Rather Than Synthetic Ice Outreach to other communities who have invested in outdoor community ice-skating systems revealed a great dissatisfaction with synthetic ice due to the fact that: 4 The ice didn't skate well. It was not a smooth skate and people weren't comfortable on it. 4 In a winter environment, skaters expect "the real thing" particularly in an environment like Estes Park Several communities contacted during the master plan had researched synthetic ice as an option ultimately veered away from it after hearing negative feedback from communities who had invested in synthetic systems, only to go to the real thing. To that end, the current recommendation is that Estes Park design for a natural ice system for Bond Park. FIRE PIT Fire pits in public areas are quite common in mountain resorts throughout Colorado and a number of contractors have the necessary experljse to install a durable system. It assumed that a high quality system will be required to be effective in Bond Park and provide warmth for park users. The current design shows a fire pit with a +/- 4' diameter vi~ fire ring surrounded by an 18" tall by 2' wide natural stone seatwall. Natural gas lines will need to be run to the fire pit BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .2 1 Final Master Plan, continued area and decisions made regarding the type of control system (timer activated, a manual control that is turned off and ~ on by Town Staff, etc). TENT TIE-DOWNS The current plan calls for tent tie-down rings to be imbedded in the pavement at each corner of the vendor tent locations. One potential product is shown in the Appendix and includes a tie-down ringthat is covered when not in use. It's not clear if these covers will need to be removed and replaced with each event or if other systems might better meet the Town's needs. GRADING AND INFRASTRUCTURE Because this is a master plan, design studies for grading, storm drainage, and utilities have been developed to a conceptual level of design. Detailed design will be required to complete the grading and infrastructure plans for Bond Park. In some instances, additional research and discussions with Town Staff will be needed to resolve outstanding issues as the park's engineering is completed. The recommendations for Bond Park's grading and infrastructure described below and in memorandums and narratives included in the Appendix are provided as guidelines for detailed design which will occur during the Construction Document phase. 4 Grading and Storm Drainage. A conceptual grading plan has been completed for Bond Park and is included in the Appendix. In general, the elevations of the curb and gutter surrounding the park will need to matched except where curb and gutter has been eliminated on the north side of the park and on MacGregor Avenue. The design parameter for the park's grading include: â€¢ Because of the desire to eliminate grade changes (curb and gutter) in areas proposed for event tents, an alternative way to capture and direct storm water runoff is envisioned. Concrete pan swales along the northerly edge of the parking on Park Lane and down the middle of MacGregor Avenue are proposed. These pans will convey storm water into the existing curb and gutter along the north side of Elkhorn Avenue. Sub-grade drainage was not considered because there are no storm drains south of the park. It may be possible to extend storm drain piping to the park, but because the nearest storm drain is 600' east of Bond Park on Elkhorn Avenue, it would be very expensive to construct. â€¢ As of now the plan envisions only minor changes to Park Lane's paving. However, it may be possible to improve the drainage along Park Lane and MacGregor Avenue north of the park by re-grading a portion of MacGregor Avenue. The existing grades in MacGregor Avenue north of Bond Park are very shallow and storm water can sometimes pond. â€¢ The conceptual grading plan recommends a minimum slope of 2% for turf areas. In addition, the current estimate of probable cost assumes that a subdrain system will be added the turf when the park's lawn areas are reconstructed. Additional study will be needed to determine if an underground detention system or sump can be designed to accommodate the turf drainage if a storm water line is not available in Elkhorn Avenue. 52~* BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Final Master Plan, continued â€¢ Currently, the northeast plaza is shown with a very gradual north-to-south slope so that it meets with the surrounding grades. Ideally this plaza would have a crowned profile so that the edges of a future ice rink would be level. Additional study is recommended to determine if a crowned plaza design can be achieved without area drains or very shallow drain pans. â€¢ The intent is to use the proposed water feature to take up the 3' to 4' elevation change at the northwest corner of the park. If the water feature is not constructed, retaining walls will likely be needed in this location. â€¢ A low berm is shown for the shrub bed west of the fire pit shelter. This will tie the raised seating in the fire pit area to the ground plane and help deflect west winds during the winter. â€¢ All final grading plans should comply with Town, state, and federal requirements for accessibility 4 Domestic Water/Sanitary Sewer. The changes to the park's domestic water system are minimal. â€¢ After discussions with parks maintenance staff, it was determined that the location of the water tap in the southeast corner of the site (just north of the large cottonwoods) will remain unchanged. This is due to the depth of the mainline for the irrigation system, phasing concerns, and other maintenance requirements. Additional study is recommended to determine if adjusting the irrigation mainline and backflow preventer configuration could improve the park's water service (eliminating the large enclosure) without creating phasing problems during construction. â€¢ Because the water feature is envisioned as a seasonal amenity (spring/summer/fall) it is proposed that the make-up water for the pumping system come from the irrigation main line, This will allow water lost due to evaporation to be made up during day when the irrigation system is idle. Additional study is needed if a year-round water feature is desired as a separate domestic water line will be needed. This line would need to be installed before the park's turf areas are renovated. â€¢ Additional study will be needed to determine where the waste water from the water feature overflow and filtration system will be taken. Currently it is assumed that this water will be piped to a gravel sump. The location and size for a gravei sump for the waste water will need to be determined. The waste water could perhaps be pipe to a sanitary sewer or storm drain line (if one was available) but Public Works staff input will be needed to evaluate these options if a chlorinated water treatment system is used. â€¢ It is assumed that the support building for the northeast plaza / ice rink will not require domestic water service or sanitary sewer. If there is a desire to distribute refreshments from this structure, it assumed this will be accomplished via vending machines or pre-packaged products. Additional study is needed to determine is if it would be desirable to stub-in domestic water, and perhaps sanitary sewer, west of the paved areas for MacGregor Avenue if these would be needed for Bond Park at some point in the future. If utility stubs are desirable, they should be constructed when MacGregor Avenue is reconstructed as a festival plaza. â€¢ Quick-coupler valves should be provided at regular intervals along the irrigation mainline to allow the Town's maintenance staff to wash down paved areas after events. As the water in the irrigation mainline is not potable, additional study will be needed to determine if locked stand pipes would be preferable. Standpipes offa domestic water line could be used for washing down pavements and could have the . added benefit of being available for for food vendors during events. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .23 Final Master Plan, continued â€¢ There is an existing, non-functional drinking fountain in the parkthat will be abandoned. If a < new drinking fountain is added in the future a service line would need to be installed prior to any improvements. â€¢ None of the proposed park improvements require sanitary sewer, so there is no plan to extend sanitary service into Bond Park at this time. i> Irrigation. The existing irrigation system for the park is a patch-work of zones and equipment that needs to be abandoned and totally replaced with a new, water-efficient system. â€¢ The existing 2" water service is more than adequate for the proposed park landscape, especially since the amount of turf in the recommend Master Plan is less than what is currently in Bond Park. â€¢ The existing irrigation controller is relatively new and has unused stations available and therefore can be used to control the renovated irrigation system. In addition, this controller serves as an intermediate communication device between the computerized, central irrigation control system and other small irrigation controllers in the vicinity of Bond Park. Therefore, the timing of any shutdown of the Bond Park irrigation controller will need to be carefully planned to avoid impacting other landscapes in the downtown. â€¢ Turf areas and annual beds should be irrigated with state-of-art overhead irrigation (pop-up spay heads/ gear-driven rotors). All shrub beds are to be irrigated with water-conserving drip irrigation. The preferred method for irrigating perennial beds will need to be determined with Town staff during the design process. 4 Electrical System and Lighting. In general, the existing electrical system for Bond Park is inadequate for the ~ current level of use. The concept plan for Bond Park's electrical and lighting systems calls for re-use of the existing Victorian pedestrian-scale light fixtures as well as new electrical systems and lighting for the proposed uses. Because of the electrical demands inherent in the upgraded system, a new electrical service and transformer will need to be extended into the park. â€¢ One of the main goals for the upgraded electrical system for the park is to provide convenient power for events. This is accomplished via electrical receptacles incorporated in bollards adjacent to event tent areas. The current electrical system concept calls for some of these bollards / receptacles to provide an additional power source for the special event food vendors. â€¢ The chiller for the ice rink and the pump(s) for the water feature create the largest demand for the park's electrical system. In addition, these improvements are scheduled to be among the final enhancements constructed in the park. Additional study will be needed to determine how these uses will be serviced in a phased construction process and the best location for their electrical panels and control systems. â€¢ Additional study will be needed to determine how night lighting for the ice rink will be provided (portable, temporary lighting units are envisioned at this time) and the best method for lighting statues and monuments in Bond Park such as the Enos Mills statue. â€¢ Lighting for Bond Park will need to be designed to provide the minimum levels of safe illumination for park users, while being unobtrusive and consistent with the current lighting levels in Downtown Estes Park. 54~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Final Master Plan, continued The Electrical Systems Narrative and Design Guidelines for Phased Construction included in the Appendix provide additional information regarding Bond Park's electrical system and lighting. The Appendix also includes a memorandum with detailed information regarding the proposed irrigation system enhancements. PHASING Because of the economic downturn and funding options available to the Town, the hope is to implement the improvements shown in the Bond Park Master Plan as funds becomes available. The current plan is to dedicate some or all of the Town's Larimer County Open Space allocation to Bond Park. By the end of 2010, the Town will have approximately $450,000 available from this funding source. This will be dedicated toward the first phase of construction for the Bond Park enhancements. The intent is to supplement this funding from grants and other potential funding sources discussed below. After discussing phasing options with the Stakeholder Committee on November 23rd, it was agreed that constructing the plazas and paved areas would be a logical first phase of construction. This is based on the assumption that it would be inefficient to make improvements to Bond Park's turf areas or landscaping until a location forthe vendortents was completed. Based on funding of around $250,000 per year, at least six phases of construction will probably be required to ~ implement the master plan. The improvements included in each phase have been grouped in logical construction sequences where possible. For most phases, additional funding from grants or other sources will be required to complete the work. The improvements currently included in each phase of Bond Park include: 4 Phase 1 -- The MacGreeor Avenue Renovation. This includes the demolition of the existing MacGregor Avenue, curb and gutter, the splitter island and turn lane south of the island, as well as the construction of the MacGregor Avenue events plaza. This phase also includes the concrete bollards needed to define the parking areas along with the associated electrical system upgrades. With the construction of the MacGregor Avenue improvements, approximately 50 vendor tents can be removed from the park's landscape/turf areas during special events. â€¢ During the master plan evaluation, there was an on-going discussion as to whether MacGregor Avenue should be paved a modular paving system instead of concrete. Modular brick or concrete unit pavers have a number of advantages over poured-in-place concrete paving. Unit pavers tend to have a longer life cycle, can be pulled up and put back in place to upgrade or replace buried utilities, and have a richer appearance than even tinted concrete. If the Town wishes to consider paving MacGregor Avenue with a modular paving system, the budget for Phase I would need to be increased by around $75,000. 4 Phase 11 - Northeast Plaza. Phase 11 includes removal of existing trees, landscaping, turf in the plaza area; removal of concrete sidewalk and a small area of temporary paving from Phase 1, and relocation of the Enos Mills statue to its new location in Bond Park. The new improvements include concrete unit paving and the sandstone margins for the northeast plaza, the associated site lighting/electrical system upgrades, portable planters and site furnishings, and landscape restoration of areas disturbed by construction. BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~2~55 Final Master Plan, continued 4 Phase Ill - The Park Lane Festival Promenade. This phase includes the demolition of the asphalt parking spaces on the south side of park lane, curb and gutter, and sidewalks to be removed. New improvements include the unit/concrete paving, street trees, and tree grates for the Festival Promenade; the concrete drain pan and decorative paving forthe south parking bay of the Park Lane. Also included arethe bollards needed to define the Park Lane parking spaces and the associated site lighting/electrical system upgrades. 4 Phase IV - Main Park Area and Elkhorn Avenue Improvements. Phase IV is the largest and most expensive phase as it includes the central green space and the Elkhorn Avenue seatwall and associated landscaping. The demolition work primarily includes all of the existing landscape and irrigation system not addressed in an earlier phase as well asthe existing fire pit, abandoned boulder fountain, and the buried foundations. New improvements include grading to improve drainage, the new turf system and irrigation, the remainder of the landscaping (shrub beds and trees), the diagonal walkway through the lawn area, and the Elkhorn Avenue Seatwall. This phase also includes a new drinking fountain and additional lighting. 4 Phase V - Fire Pit, Staee, Children's Climbintz Sculpture, and the Tree Plazas on Elkhorn Avenue. Phase V includes limited demolition and grading as that work was essentially completed in the four previous phases. This phase does include the fire pit area and associated shelter, the southwest and southeast entry plazas and the seating plaza on Elkhorn Avenue adjacent to the seatwall. The stage is included in this phase of work as is the children's climbing statue, along with additional planters, site furnishings and a monument sign for the park. b Phase VI - Remaininiz Structure and Water Feature. The final phase of construction includes the remaining structures (the Timber Gateway Shelter, the fabric stage cover, and the mechanical/concessions/skate rental building for the ice rink. The water feature that flanks the stage is also included in this final phase of ~ construction. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Followingthe development of the Preferred Plan, the Master Plan Team completed a preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost. This preliminary estimate evolved into the final Opinion of Probable Cost for the Bond Park Master Plan, which is included in the Appendix. This estimate includes as much detail as possible so that each of the major elements of construction are broken down -- from contractor mobilization and demolition to new electrical systems. The current Opinion of Probable Cost shows a projected total of $1.84 million if all of the master plan improvements are constructed in one phase (in 2009 dollars). The figures shown in the estimate include the hard construction cost and an estimating contingency, as well as factors for soft costs such as a construction contingency, design fees, and materials testing during construction. Since this project will need to be phased, the Opinion of Probable Cost also shows the cost for each projected phase of construction. Because phased construction is not as efficient (e.g. the contractor has costs to mobilize each construction season), some of the individual cost line items have been increased over the master plan estimate. In addition, costs that are based on a percent of construction have been increased to reflect the smaller scale of the phased construction work (loss of the discount due to the larger construction volume). The result is that the total cost for the project is increased when a project is phase. The total cost by phase is as follows: 56,~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Final Master Plan, continued 4 Phase l: $391,672 an Phasell: $326,211 u, Phase 111: $259,760 4 Phase IV: $405,784 4 Phase V: $353,341 4 Phase VI $348,560 DESIGN GUIDELINES Because the renovation of Bond Park will be phased, it will be critical that there be a guiding vision for the park's renovation. The Design Guidelines for Phased ././FFY-3 4/:.321..... I E~ Construction have been developed to provide that vision r. and included in the Appendix of this document. These , A..i .die,pw-----* guidelines are intended to establish basic standards for :I""91/04*444'limay'Fillillig'll//0 INt i.1 1 -rÂ·'~ the park's elements, materials, and finishes, while still ..14*4110* .iJ:,1/9-~. allowing latitude for landscape architects and architects to develop creative design solutions during detailed design. The Design Guidelines provide direction on park ~ structures, landscaping, paving systems, lighting, and site Figure 14: Example of successfu/ perennial furnishings. bed. FUNDING OPTIONS There are a variety of funding sources the Town of Estes Park should explore to implement the Bond Park Master Plan. The Master Plan Team has developed a funding matrix (see the next page) that identifies funding options, what elements of the park each funding source could contribute to, and details about each source. Each of these funding sources should be explored as the Town puts together a strategy to implement the Bond Park Master Plan BOND PARK MASTER PLAN <57 Page intentionally left blank 58~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN 6 POTENTIAL SOURCE SPECIFIC FUND ABOUT HOW IT APPLIES TO BOND PARK REVENUE The redesign of Bond Park should alleviate (Pending) events and substantial weather enhancements and ongoing care of the park, organizers by the Town of Estes Park in income from event fees: increasing the current Event Fees (Pending) apeul sluall.laouellua aoeds luaAa luauel.ujad spuesno41 3uill.JoilaM 'OpeJoloo u! uoileu!1Sap aq plnoo 1e41 Uls.!Uelpalll Buipuni leuo!1!ppe Â®01!puad) sdellop xel sales Jiawl aAeal pue 'lied puog Jo lied se palinpuo) 4]eanno Al!Unl.Uluoo xelsales 841 JO alll 05 JO SISO) 341 JaAO) 01 pasn A substantial amount of general obligation many existing maintenance issues. While funding is currently being directed just to funds will still need to be allocated towards Town of Estes Current Park maintain the grass and landscaping in Bond maintenance, the goal of this plan is to Park Maintenance Funds Park, which is frequently damaged after big redirect maintenance dollars into visible occurrences. rather than expensive overhauls such as complete sod replacement. new and better event facilities being provided at Bond Park, and with the expectation that more events could occur, Event fees are user fees charged to event there could be two sources of additional exchange for hosting an event in Bond Park fees slightly; and new fees generated from on Town property. new events uses. New event fees cou d be ped puog u! uielunol, A>pow 01 Ae/v\ale3 alli se '>ped sajs3 ls!3not doj e se SaAJas '>ped leuo!;eN ue s! anuaAal xelsales u! aseaJou! Uv 341 1!s!A SJol!s!A aso41 *leaA Lpea s.101!SiA Jo puos JO 300 041 JO aLLJOS laS+Jo 01 pasn u! sluaAa pualle '10!3115!p ssau!snq ped SOJS3 le!luelsqns a41 slual,UaAOidul! >ped 041 01 lualuaJOU! leuoilippe ue juippv 'pu!40q e palellsuoulap ssaioid ueld Jalsel/\I 341 301 |001 3u!pun, e se asuas salem xel 3u!15!xe ol Al!Unulluo) 341 Jo ued all j uo ssauBu!Il!/v\ Buuq diall 01 Ped sl! saop >ped 341'>ped puos lIU/,A lualudolaAapaj >ped puog al.11 13oddns e 40n034 1 MJed sals3 01 ssauisnq pue aidoad siellop Joloas ale/Uld aulos 'SleARsal pue sluaAa Jo dnauil BUOJ is Bond Park Financing Options NV1d 3319VW >lavd CNOE The LMD is a potential partner in helping to The Estes Park Local Marketing District activate Bond Park year-round with 0-MD) was created in August 2008 and is programming, events and and ice skating rink. funded by a 2% lodging tax on facilities The LMD could be a potential funding partner, throughout the Estes Valley. By state a potential marketing partner and a potential statute, the LMD can fund the organization, event coordinator forthe winter activation promotion, marketing and management of strategies outlined in this plan, including public events, and the coordination of assisting with the management of the ice rink, tourism promotion activities, among other and creation of new community events to things. bring people to Bond Park and Estes Park duringthe holiday and winter months. GOCO Funds are a good match for the Bond GOCO Grants help preserve, protect, Park project. With the Bond Park Master Plan enhance and manage the state's wildlife, completed, the Town should submit the plan park, river, trail and open space heritage. concept to determine funding possibilities, Aa>I 01 suoilnq!.Iluo) apniou! pino) 40!4AA lue.IS Joi alq!2!la aq 01 Ala>I!' s! >lied puog old'34 40!lIM ueid>ped alll Jo sluawma pue aoeds uado slueijold 341 Japun spunJ alll JO alpp!Ul alR u! aoeds )!lqnd s!41 aleA!1]e Â·spund Buiuueld luaLUU.laAOD leool 'AllurIWLUOD SSaUISnq UN\OJUAAOp Nvld 3319Â¥W Navd ONOg Special Districts Estes Park URA Local Marketing District Larimer County Open Grant Sources Space Fund Great Outdoors spund OpeJolOD (0009) tx -2 .(1) E k ro O row 0.. 622213E=Â§ & 5 B &.2 Revenues from ice rink operation can be including: ice skating ticket sales, skate rental fees, concession sales (i.e. hot chocolate, rce of funding for many public space The Town should identify key park elements projects and Bond Park should be no that could receive donations or funding, which different. There are several elements of the could include but may not be limited to: public parkthat could be funded through private art, entry shelter, stage, fire pit/seating area. AlaleA!Id aq pinoo >lu!.3 ao! alll 'uo!1!Ppe ul e se sdiqsiosuods Jo SUO!1ellop Joloas leuoilippe ue se sll.~3!3 3Uiuleu 41!A/\ paiosuods -BUOi e JO Al!Unl.UU]00 841 01 uounqujuoo 301005 aleALId The addition of an ice skating rink is posed for Bond Park as part of the er Plan. This rink would not be a part infrastructure, and it's costs have not ctions. Various options for providing skating in Bond Park will yield different generated through a variety of means, (ola 'u.toodod ts in year one and beyond. However, se costs can be offset by revenue from operations, which can be used to offset investment in the rink and could tially be a future revenue generator Ice Skating Rink Sales other projects and programs in Bond te sector donations are an important arnos anuaAw Palloleul-HaAA e JOJ loafoid A]elial lulal pue sd!4sjosuods been factored into the final cost 'JaA!3 suoileuoa Other and Concessions NÂ¥ld 3319Â¥W >13Â¥d (INOg Final Master Plan, continued ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF DESIGN Anytime a Town looks to make an investment in a community asset such as a park, the question is always asked, what is the return on investment and how can this project be leveraged for the betterment of Estes Park as a whole? Currently, Bond Park has served the Town well simply by being an open space in the heart of the business district. That open space has given way to events that draw people during warm weather months -- people that generally also tend to spend dollars in shops downtown. An investment in Bond Park and the implementation of this Master Plan will have both qualitative and quantitative benefits. Specifically, our assumptions from best practice research, community input and stakeholder outreach lead us to believe that the design will: b Increase Year-Round Visitation to Downtown Estes Park: Survey responses show a dip in visitation to downtown during the winter months. While the specific motivation behind decreased visitation habits cannot be determined, it can be assumed that some of this is driven by a lack of downtown activity. Bond Park serves as an activator for the business district, events in the park spill into the district and feed businesses. By creating a park that is not only an inviting place year-round, but is also activated and programmed year-round, visitation to the park, and therefore the business district, is likely to increase. 4 Park Design Increases Visibility of the Business District: The design of Bond Park in the Master Plan has been thoughtfully devised to keep in mind not just the businesses that front Elkhorn Avenue, but also the businesses that front Park Lane. By creating a defined space with more walkways and "spaces" the park naturally draws people around the park to expose them to storefronts they may not have otherwise explored. In particular, the Festival Promenade draws people around the perimeter park in a purposeful effort to bring business not just to vendors but to retailers with Park Lane storefronts. This design intent meets the goal of helping better connect the park to the business district, and in that manner should serve to help increase sales tax and make the Park Lane properties more visible to shoppers. b Increased Events Throughout the Year Bring Increased Visitors: Currently, Bond Park hosts an intense series of events during the warm-weather months that draw thousands of people - many of them visitors from outside of the community-totown to spend their dollars in your community. Increasingthe viability of the park to host year-round programming and events - including things such as ice skating and ice sculpting contests - means more opportunities to bring people from the outside in to spend dollars and boost sales tax revenues. 62~ BOND PARK MASTER PLAN I APPENDIX June 24,2009 Kick-Off Meeting Summary July 22,2009 Focus Group Summaries Preliminary Park Program and the Analysis/Ranking of the Focus Group Park Improvements Recommendations (August 3,2009) Community Survey Results Initial Concepts Report (August 7,2009) Labor Day and Town Employee Polling Results September 16, 2009 Stakeholder Committed Review Summary Online Voting Summary and Comments Public Forum #1 Summary and Agenda, Summary of Written Comments, and Results from Concept Preference Voting Sheets October 1, 2009 Stakeholder Committee Review Summary Sample Ice Rink Concessionaire RFP Public Forum #2 Summary and Agenda Opinion of Probable Cost Design Guidelines Electrical Systems Master Plan Narrative Irrigation Design Memorandum Conceptual Grading Plan BOND PARK MASTER PLAN .23 WINSTON VAÂ¥ MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATES TO: Meeting Attendees FROM: Paul Kuhn, * inston Associates PROJECT: Estes Park/Bond Park Master Plan SUBJECT: Kick-Off Meeting With Stakeholders MEMO DATE: July 6,2009 MEETING DATE: June 24,2009 ATTENDING: STAKEHOLDERS Eric Blackhurst (Eric) - TOEP/Trustee Barb Boyer Buck (Barb) - Engineering Office Xianager Bob Joseph (Bob) - TOEP/Community Development Dave Mahany (Dave) - TOEP/Public Works jerry Miller (Jerry) - TOEP/Trustee Ron Norris (Ron) - Estes Valley Planning Commission Kathy Palmeri Kathy - LMD Torn Pickering (Tom) -TOEP/Conventions and Visitors Bureau ~ Amy Plummer (Amy) - Van Horn Engineering Kate Rusch (Kate) - TOEP Public 1nforination C)fficcr Ann Taylor (Ann) - Scott Zurn (Scott) - TOEP Public Works DESIGN TEAM Jamie Licko (}amic) - Progressive Urban Management Associates (PUMA) Paul Kuhn (Paul) - Winston Associates (WA) Angie Hulsebus (Angie) - Winston Associates CiA) Note: Bold text in italics denotes tasks / actions for the Master Plan Team or TOEP staff. GENERAL â€¢ Stakeholders group represents: staff, business, trustees, marketing â€¢ Copy Scott on all emails m Jamie will send a draft of the survey to Scott and the Stakeholder Group â€¢ Coordinate with and keep Kate informed about the website's set up and goals â€¢ WA to develop a list of adjacent property owners within one block in each direction of the park site WINSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. 4696 Broadwav, Boulder CO 80304 (P) 303.440.9200 (F) 303.449.6911 wwÂ·w.winstonassociates.com (Direct) 303.440.9240 pmkuhn@winstonassociates.com Kick-Off Meeting Summary Meeting Date: June 24,2{)09 Page 2 of 6 COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS Bob â€¢ Many Estes Park residents feel a sense of nostalgia for the library that was located Bond Park . Spent his childhood vacationing in Estes Park â€¢ Distill good qualities of EP into park: o Lots of change over 20 - 30 years o Estes Park is a family town, keep that cc m nection 0 1)oesn't want just a nicely designed generic, urban space generic space you could find anywhere in the U.S. o Keep connected to history and setting 1 Frame and protect views (outside of park) 1 Should not be too heavily programmed Ron â€¢ Take time to get wide spectrum of public input Work to identiftÂ· areas of consensus 1 Thoughts related to park design: Park is small but it should bc unique Don't pave whole thing, kccp grass)'/natural areas Frame views Tic area tc) histon' â€¢ Comments on process: o Deliverables: Need to identity what they are, what they are not, what we should avoid . Consider for each phase of the work o How will communication between the master plan team, the Town, and the stakehc,lder group be handled throughout process? . Confirm communication strategies and deliverables o Likes detail ofscope ofwork â€¢ Find a way to incorporate / respond to new thoughts or ideas as they arise during the master plan process â€¢ Would like to see 3 unique approaches to the park plan (different from each other) â€¢ Need to identify what constitutes a successful completion of each phase ofthe work and the master plan . Need to carefully manage communications with the public regarding funding the park's renovation Eric ' See Bond Park as people place with facilities for families and picnic tables. Not as nostalgic about libran. o The park accommodates 80,000 people a year (visitors) o Cowboy sing-alongs/music Make the park a central congregational point for community events (car show, sled- dog pulls) Bond Park helps the business community downtown Create a relaxing place for visitors 2 00 0 0000 0 Kick-( )ff Meeting Sumniary liceting 1)ate: June 24, 2(}()c) Page 3 of 6 o Quiet place o Easy to maintain (unlike now) o Need adequate infrastructure o Accommodate different aspects of the community: Visitors, quiet place, shoppers o Sees competing needs and goals for the park that will need to be resolved o Most businesses love events in park; a few don't o Would like to see a permanent stage (lots of musical events held in park - currently a rickety portable stage is brought in evenÂ· time) Ann â€¢ Loved libran â€¢ Ill=1 drinking fountain that overflowed for dogs â€¢ Should remain a park â€¢ Familv oriented, wildlife watching â€¢ Use Bond Park as a satellite facility for events held elsewhere in Town â€¢ Use new fairgrounds building for main fair events â€¢ Park needs to be "green" â€¢ Could see a wildlife/history walk with decorative, stamped concrete. Would help keep people off the grass. Would "grass grids" help? â€¢ Most events now being held in the park added over the last 15 years. 1.ikes the events, but they're hard on the park â€¢ Loves park in Grand Lake - similar Jerry â€¢ Concurs with all previous points â€¢ Nostalgic about Bond Park: library, town hall, police department, old fire station with siren â€¢ Park has never really functioned as a "park" o Reduced in size when Virginia Street was realigned o Former uses: makeshift playground, annual Halloween egg fight o Wasa hang-out for kids when town hall was a school â€¢ Pick up on history/nostalgia o Most people don't remember when the pile of rocks was a fountain â€¢ Must be maintainable, but also needs to be green o Find correct base for grass; grass pave? â€¢ Entertainment vcs, but should be limited because of new performance park in town o Keep Bond Park's small scale, intimate â€¢ Business on north side of Bond Park concerned with visibility from street; trees block view â€¢ Build in flexibility - allow for multiple uses â€¢ lixpand use during off- season (winter) - 'brown hole' o May-Oct well used/Oct-April dead 0 3()s, 4()s, 50%:heard suggestions for an ice rink. This is difficult as sun hits park and melts ice. Is synthetic ice an option like at Flatirons and in Longinont (examples suggested by others) Amy â€¢ Is a resident uÂ·ants to keep the park active â€¢ Enjoys downtown functions (music, etc) â€¢ Likes art events; â€¢ Maintain views, especially to the southwest 3 Kick-()ff Meeting Summary Meeting 1)ate: June 24,2009 Page 4 of 6 Kate . Good to involve the public, should drive process I Use master plan process to increase public awareness â€¢ Sustainability important, let public knou 1 Would like to be involved with all parts that involve public and website well in advance ~ Document reasons to vanÂ· from public input Paul â€¢ WA will look into setting up a project website for stakeholders (idea supported by Stakehc,lders) Barb â€¢ Focused on the practical aspects, especially funding â€¢ Need to target grants cycles: o GOCO - Aug 26 application deadline, will fund recreation-related projects â€¢ Likes idea of outdoor recreation and ice-skating ' Already looked ata couple of funding sources o Jamie will meet with Barb during the master plan to review funding options Miscellaneous Town Trustee comments on funding: â€¢ Board spends 4 weeks in October talking about budget o Set aside money for projects in the coming year o Target having the estimated renovation costs identified in time for the October budget meetings 1 Have a Community Reinvestment Program that could be looked to as a funding source â€¢ This project has been talked about for a long time; want to keep it moving 1 The Town would probably not support a Business Improvement District o May be abolishing the Urban Renewal Authority in the near future. â€¢ No bonds: use cash, grants, CIP â€¢ Financial expectations: manage group and community financial goals; watch out for misunderstandings Tom â€¢ Oversees the maintenance of Bond Park - so making the park maintainable is his focus, â€¢ The trailer/portable stage that's bought in for music gives park a "construction site" look; need to provide a more permanent stage â€¢ Need to evaluate how park is used for events â€¢ Vegetation that looks attractirre year-round â€¢ Rain kills grass with first event . Don't want Bond Park to compete with the Performance Park and Riverside Plaza for music CT-ents ' Come up with venues year-round (lan-Mar not attractive) â€¢ Grass problematic, but green is desired o Santa Fe gave up on grass in their central green space o Jackson Hole is trying to make grass work in theirs, but struggling â€¢ Fencing twice/year for alcoholic events Tn- not to stake in ground (barrels) . Events 12 month/year (night lighting, fire pits) 4 Kick-Off \Ieeting Summary Meeting 1):~te: June 24, 2009 Page 5 of 6 â€¢ 1 jighting: Be aware that the lighting fixtures in Bond Park were selected by a public votc. Would need a good reason to change fixtures Dave â€¢ Want something that is unique to Estes â€¢ Meet user's needs â€¢ Low maintenance o Don't want to rebuild each war â€¢ Attractive landscape Kathy â€¢ Balance needs of visitors and in-town people â€¢ She doesn't use the grass areas in the park at all o Does want attractive landscaping â€¢ Doesn't care as much about the library Eric â€¢ Work to inform/involve new residents -- turn-over in town high (5-8% per rear), people lose history o New people often approach the park with a "suburban" perspective (lerry) â€¢ Educate the public on history Scott â€¢ Park currently unsophisticated â€¢ Has no nostalgia for the park's histi,n â€¢ Bond Park an opportunity to be a huge catalyst for increasing winter visitors/business o Re-invest â€¢ Huge lack of art in communinÂ·-need tn address this (sculpture, music) â€¢ Not maintainable, not a nice park â€¢ Flexible for small music venues, revolving sculptures, ice sculptures â€¢ Currentlv un-maintainable Jetry â€¢ Grass hard to maintain, but this is the only green space in the downtown â€¢ Estes Park is the #1 most visited city among the Colorado mountain/resort towns. ~ Starting to sec n-lore visitors come to Estes Park and not proceed RAINP o Artwork suggestion: F. C ). Stanley very influential for Estes, statue? PUBLIC PROCESS â€¢ jamie: Need to keep the public informed oil both funding and maintenance constraints o Will be sure to involve Kate o Ron: Keep the Stakeholders apprised on the public input â€¢ Scott: Do we need to push to get tourist input? o Ron: Something we should consider o Tom: Feedback has been gathered from tourists in the past. I.ast visitor intercept was completed in 2006 and may be adequate. o Scott: One option would be to find a way to have visitors comment on the three options for the park. 5 Kick-( ) ff Meeting Summan Meeting Date: June 24,24)()9 Page 6 of 6 o Jamie: Would be possible to have the visitors complete the survey if there's a way to make it available to them. ~ Could use the Visitors and Convention Bureau's database o Kate: Would like to find out what would attract visitors to Estes Park in the winter. â€¢ Bob: Feels urban renewal/downtown renewal hasn't engaged residents o C )ne of the gauges of the success or the renovation is if we attract locals down tc,wn â€¢ jernÂ·: Some residents like coming downtown in the summer, some wouldn't be caught dead in the downtown in the sunimer o Would like to know what would bring resident downtown in the winter. â€¢ Barb: Residents do come downtown for shops, but a lot shops close in the winter o There is a misconception that most of the downtown is closed during the winter â€¢ Trustees: Would like one or two briefings to the town Trustees o Not full-blown presentation - inaybc Scott would cio the briefing Scott . WA to provide 3 solid concepts. Present to the stakeholders and community as well as the Trustees â€¢ Trustees like information -- want to know where we arc in the process o Doesn't have to be a huge presentation o Want to avoid big surprises at the end â€¢ Scott and Paul will discuss how to incorporate more briefings with the Trustees â€¢ This will project will almost certainly need to be phased o This process need to identify manageable phases; but it must look like one project in the end Focus Group Suggestions: â€¢ New-corners â€¢ Event organizers â€¢ Merchants/property owners ' Trustees and Planning Commission â€¢ LAID/CBD â€¢ Younger families â€¢ Arts com inunitv â€¢ Input on focus groups and survey via email â€¢ PUMA to provide a draft of the survey mid next week and distribute via email for review "The meeti'ngsitnining prorided abore is the memo alitbor's linderstanding, or interpretation of the stibjects covered dininy, tbe meethig. Mimites are /O be distributed to all parties in attendance. Any discrepancies and/ or exclusions must be clarifed in a timely mamier (+ 1-jire working dals) for conrection and re-distrilmtion. 6 Estes Park, Colorado Bond Park Master Plan Public Forums July 22,2009 (Prepared by Progressive Urban Management Associates) As part of the Bond Park master planning effort, four workshops were held with town representatives, civic partners, residents, business owners, and other stakeholders to create a vision for the future of Bond Park and to identify potential improvements. 1. Existing Conditions Participants were asked to describe how they see Bond Park today. A summary of the discussion follows: Town Representatives Civic Partners Community Partners Downtown Estes Park Stakeholders Event center Tired Small Dumpy Green space Central Centrally located Neglected Oasis Green Green Downtown focal point Stark Flexible A bit barren Deadtrees Game park/wildlife Oasis Non-descript Miss ng water feature Used daily Busy Well used Central/accessible Resting location Changing Visible Convenient Inviting Multi-faceted Surrounded by cars Abused - events Meeting point Community resource Not inviting-Doesn't grab you People place Picnic grounds Landmark Historic Maintenance problem .Tourist and resident attraction Gathering place for tourists and locals Expensive Events! Over used/beaten up Safe Iconic Critical Point of reference ~ Town setting Showcase for political causes Unused in winter Historic Shortcut 11. Vision Participants were asked to envision the Bond Park today and how they would like to see it ten to twenty years in the future. A summary of the discussion follows: Town Representatives Civic Partners Community Partners Downtown Estes Park Staket Town square Vibrant Attractive landscape Green - grass, trees Community friendly Accessibleto pedestrians Pedestrian crossroads Local gathering place People place Open Easily accessible People place Restful Inviting Utilitarian Quiet, calming Sense of place Versatile Classy Beautiful Multi-functional Green Signature of Estes Park Non-commercial Multi-seasonal Shady Flexible use Open Active Natural Remain focal point Compliment commercial Maintenance friendly Larger presence Community "feel" - events Home to smalle cultural events Prestigous Not a parking lot Maintain perception of green Peaceful Year-round gathering spot More accessible through parking Oasis Beautiful Compliment to existing parks Art Welcoming Family friendly Good stewardship C ompliments Downtown Retains sense of history Compliments the Town vision Green ~ Relate to open space and other parks 111. Improvements/Priorities Participants were then asked to outline the changes they would like to see to achieve the vision they have for Bond Park. After identifying the changes, they were asked to vote for the ideas they felt would most positively impact the corridor. Town Representatives Civic Partners Improvements Description Score Score Improvements ' Desctiption Score #2 Better - Thoughtful Enlarge -Use parking lot across the streel configuration for -Multi-use parking/events park/Incorporate - Pull into riverwalk events -Events should not adjacent parking 11 -Incorporate natural space overtake park lot 8-- -Paverskreative hardscaping -Incorporate the Virginia lot Close Lower -Extend park -Remove parking MacGregor -8eaware of parking 10 -Use MacGregor . -Temporary parking Open space -Picnic areas Landscape -Bushes -Mobile seating enhancements -Plants labeled -Place to relax 5 -Botanic gardens -Use as civic green -Trees/forest asthetic -Maintain green space -Reinforce views Move large -Craft fair/car show 7 1 events outside of - Elk horn lodge 3 -Diverse landscape/plants park -Seasonally pleasant Ice rink -Removable 3 Family-friendly -Landscaping act as wind barrier 2 picnic area Sculptures/art 5 2 Water feature 2 Seating areas -Benches Enhance 3 1 connection to 1 RMNP Fire pit 3 Park amenities -Seatihg walls Remain open -Avoid commercial "feel" -Walkways 3 2 space -Central/high quality experience Consider -Playground material Pedestrian -Connect to riverwalk alternative -Synthetic turf 2 4 connectivty to surfaces Ice skating rink Focal point for 2 2 information Design that ties Historic 2 1 into civic complex connections Performance -Stage 2 1 venue -Bandshel Water Feature -Fountain 1 2 -Appealing in winter Shelter -Architecturally interesting 1 -Wind/rain shelter Connecting to - Renaming Bond Park 1 history 11 1111111 11 11111111 Community Partners Downtown Estes Park Stakeholc ers Improvements Description Score Score Improvements Description Score Score #2 . 02 -Make area a pedestrian Remove all parking 8 Landscaping -Holds up to pedestrian traffic priority â€ž Shelter/Pavillion/Ban -Open feeling 5 1 dstand . 4 Incorporate more -Events -Continuation to mountains 4 1 -Ughting 11 winter activities -Ice rink Family friendly -Water play areas -Accessibility (ADA) features -Natural features for kids 3 -Mitigate wind Water feature/Fire pil -Creek -Visually open up fron of the 3 3 park Integrate -To/from park -Sensitive to businesses around 2 1 shuttle/transit -Parking ! Expanding park -MacGregor Improvements to -More local event activity space -Virginia 6 make events user -More electricity -Continue events/not limit friendly -More attractive fencing Permanent stage -Gazebo/bandshell 5 * -2 2 2 -More permanent facilties Water features 4 2 More public -More permanent signage 4 1 arthculpture Theme - Historic connections 1 Decorative -Nature -RMNP walkway grid - Connections to history; history 3 Seating -Picnic table walk -Benches Ice rink 1 1 Statues/Public art - Flexible art spaces Events -Better set up Better lighting -Walkway , 1 -Increase quality amenRies Information board/center -Maintain small events; keep them manageable -More events/year round Fire pit 3 IV. Implementation/Funding Participants were then asked to brainstorm potential funding sources and revenue streams for the improvements and priorities that were discussed. S . Town Representatives Civic Partners Community Partners - Avoid BID? - GOCO * GOCO Partner with recreation district EPURA User/event fees Downtown Development Sales tax GOCO funds? Authority Increase user fees for events-BID Community reinvestment fund: Larimer County Open Space LMD Enterprise funds Ice rink revenue? Sales tax increase EPURA Grants Increase use fees Ice skating rink funds? Private sector sponsorhsip Premium parking fees and donations V. Next Steps â€¢ Digital design charrette ---- August 10,2009 â€¢ Community open house - September 2,2009 â€¢ Board of Trustees meeting - September 8,2009 â€¢ Second community open house ---- October 8,2009 â€¢ Review by Board of Trustees - November, 2009 â€¢ Final Master Plan -----December, 2009 BOND PARK PROGRAM ELEMENTS Digital Design Charrette Preparation August 3,2009 Program Elements to be Modeled in 3D Informal Ice Skating Rink (Built over an area that's paved in the summer months) Combined Picnic Shelter/Pavilion and Bandstand Group Picnic Shelter (Stand Alone) Bandstand (Stand Alone) Naturalized Bandstand (Boulders / Rock Out-Cropping) Water Feature: 1 Water Course Through the Park 1 Pop-Jet Fountain > Splash Ground > Naturalized Water Feature (Boulders / Rock Out-Cropping) 1 Something that could function as a water feature in the summer and fire pit in the winter. Sculptures / Art 1 Historic figures F. O. Stanley (Stanley Hotel) > Wildlife > Whimsical Fire Pit Benches / Seating Areas Various sizes of rocks and boulders Bus Stop Family Picnic Area Various size trees (deciduous and evergreen) Stone Veneer Seatwalls Boulder Seatwalls "Plan View:" Improvements Turf areas Shrub beds Areas of special paving k Parking areas converted to dual-use festival areas k Pedestrian plazas o Unit pavers o Tinted concrete Other Site Planning Needs Specific Event Needs: > 10' x 10' vendor tents > A 24' x 24' dance floor (Scandinavian Festival) > Shade for a "Viking Encampment" (Scandinavian Festival) 1 Maypole: needs a 35' diameter circle (ScAndinavian Festival) Improvements to the Park's electrical system. ...0 W .,. r. r ~0,6,0000 1â€¢~ ..M â‚¬9 â‚¬9 M M MNNWN.rr CD E-Lorâ€ž h 1.0 N 00 r N CO 01 00 CO 01 Lo CO 01 - N r- LO (9 h CO m N N (NI ...r- 4 Ui .0 2 E E CO g 2 e 0 2 0 5 IL co I & N m N 1 fE 2 w 2 0 - - 2%2 2 b e S W i R 69.~ 00 2 0% 0-2 E c 1 m s s ~" 2- 3 = 23 g : 2 2 * ~8 9-fâ‚¬E ~al c LL E .0 6 CO L Â® 15 C 24 2 & 2 A.% 30EE 3 -5 9 8 1: 2 -2 3 9 k -6 E m E VE. 2 -< 11 3 g _ J03* EN O 22 SEâ‚¬â‚¬a,% *fisce 'll 216 Â·0 0 8 3 â‚¬ i Â·* m Â® W m - a) O CD O 00 = a C/)2i--ILLJCOJLLSD.OO-ECONIS : Focus Group Improvement Recommendations Analysis / Ranking 8/3/2009 FG #1 FG #2 FG #3 FG #4 Total r/ Expand Into West Parking Lot 10 g a ion f r Events 11 nts (Ho SkaNngtoR~2- %2~trog, Accessible, Wind Mitigation, etc.) lid eJU Jo euo einjeei JeleAA Joi OAN :jilds ejeAA selo/\ â€žlid eJ!=1 / eJnjee=I JejeMâ€ž e Joi SejOA eeJ41 pell Â£# dnog s (Water Play / Natural Play Events) re or History Theme / Information ts / Ice xeldlu ! el# o; uoiloeu ee]Â¥ 0!uold kipue!33 Allu elueLU BUORS / AJols!H 01 uolloeuuo dNWhI 01 uonoeuuoo eo Bond Park Ma Counting Tier 1 reas Conne Mled mui dols emn4S UAAO1 ele,6e Shelter / Pavilion Water Feature ** ueA eouellil I 00 00 0 to Y e M (9 M (9 IN (9 -r CD N <O h ID U - CO 1.0 00 CD (9 00 4- 00 03 T- 00 (9 (NI LiD CO CN to (9 00 0 4 (9 (9 - 2 (D C Â·B E (0 CD 2% EE 00 1 G U. 22 80 >2c .ELLI J m U.1-0 *E a) S .2 - - :E & m â‚¬ 3 .8 &.% 12 6 3 E Â·- u 0 0 j LU m .C .5, 13 J * 12 Z 15 ~ 22Â·51-G'~f2O-2*13 @ C 2 k 154* 322*BÂ®OC -16-22/m t> 2 0 {0 2 8 ~.9.(2 2 E to (D m Â® 8 (13 0%23 1%2 2/ O $ ~ 0 0 DO j $ LI- 1- J 0- $ CD O 0- $ U. E S LL U) LU cus Group Improvement Recommendations Analysis / Ranking 8/3/2009 FG #1 FG #2 FG #3 FG #4 Total ctivities (Events / Ice Skating Rink - Removable) irdsic*spee~Tr~ovnesmpinct~ (Holds Up to Use, Open, Lighting, Accessible, Wind M Sluewele OAN 841 use/vueq lilds eie/v~ sam\ .1!d e]! 3 / einjee:~ Jele/V\â€ž e Joi SeloA Xts pell Â£# dnolo ** Counting all Votes (Tier 1 and Tier 2) MacGregor / Expand Into West Parking Lot from the Park Edges Friendly (Better Elec., Attractive Fencing, More Permanent Facilities, etc.) to the Civic Complex >ped 841 Jo epislno sl (slueA3 Keld leinieN / Xeld JeleAA) sainjee Med olu! dols emnqS UolleULJO;Ul / el,Ue41 Ajols!H Jo einteN 41!M avilion / Bandstand nfiguration for Events al,U841 6uoilS / AÂ·10;S!H 01 uolpeulloo ond Park Master Plan n Connectivity enueA 80Uel.UJ eeJÂ¥ O!uoid Xipueu dNINh! 01 uo,peuuoo BOND PARK MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS AUGUST 6,2009 In July 2009, the Town of Estes Park surveyed the community, residents and visitors to determine their priorities for a thoughtful redesign of Bond Park in an effort to make it a more user friendly space. The survey generated 356 responses and provided meaningful input into the Bond Park Master Plan design process. The survey was distributed via advertisements in the town newspaper and via direct email solicitation to dozens of local community organizations. The following summarizes the demographic make-up of the respondents to the survey: Home Zip Code: L80517 - Estes Park, CO 89.5% (229) 80634 - Greeley, CO 1.2% (4) 1*i-2 - Glen Haven,.CO .9% (3) -1 80504 - Longmont, CO .6% (2) I 80510 - Allenspark, CO .6% (2)- 80512 - Bellvue, CO .6% (2) L80515.z.Drake, CO - --- . 6%-(2) 80537 - Loveland, CO .6% (2) 80538 - Ldveland,-CO-- .6%(2) ---- I Other zip codes (1 respondent from each): â€¢ 34684 - Palm Harbor, EL ' 76205 - Denton, TX â€¢ 63119 - Saint Louis, MO â€¢ 76262 - Roanoke, TX â€¢ 64105 - Kansas City, MO â€¢ 80212 - Denver, CO â€¢ 68118 - Omaha, NE ' 80302 - Boulder, CO â€¢ 68801 - Grand Island, NE ' 80516 - Erie, CO â€¢ 69024 - Culbertson, NE â€¢ 80525 - Fort Collins, CO â€¢ 72113 - Maumelle, AR â€¢ 85248 - Chandler, AZ â€¢ 72401 - Jonesboro, AR Are you a: _Full-time resident of Estes Park 84.8% (278) 1 Part-time resident of Estes Park 9.8% (32) 1 1 Estes Park Visitor -- 5.5% (18) Including yourself, how many... 01234 5+ 1 Adults reside in your household? .9% 14.3% 77.3% 3.1% 4.3% 0% (3) (46) (249) (10) (14) (0) Children under 18 reside in your household? 65% 15.7% 12.7% 4.1% - i% 1.5% (128) (31) (25) (8) (2) (3) Age of respondent: LUnder 18 -0%.(9) 18-29 2.5% (8) 30-44 16.6% (53) . 45-59 42% (134) EZ6+ 38.9% (124) Gender of respondent: 1 Male 46.6% (146) Female , 53.4% (167) In this community survey, respondents were asked questions about Bond Park today, were asked to provide input and ideas on planning for the future of Bond Park, and were given an opportunity to identify how best to implement any improvements. In addition to summarizing the aggregate score of all the respondents, the findings have also been cross-tabulated by: â€¢ Whether the respondent is a full-time resident of Estes Park, part-time resident, or visitor â€¢ Whether the respondent does or does not have children under the age of 18 â€¢ The age of the respondent Where there were significant and important variations in these cross-tabbed results, the variances have ~ been noted below each question summary. The following pages highlight, by section, respbnses to each of the questions asked in the community survey about Bond Park. SECTION 1: BOND PARK TODAY The first section of the survey asked respondents questions about the current state of the park, their petceptions of the image of the park, and how they use Bond Park as well as Downtown Estes Park. The questions probed thoughts on the aesthetics and appearance of the park as well as what draws users to the park. The responses are as follows: How frequently do you visit Downtown Estes Park? (Select one.) Daily 45.1% (158) Weekly 4, 34% (119) L.Malltilly 191% (36) A few times per year 10.6% (37) Â·Â· 1 Never O.696 (O) Downtown Estes Park has extraordinary user-ship. It's unique to find this high of visitation in the downtown with such frequency. This information is important for both the purposes of this survey, and for the businesses in the downtown area. l . When you visit Downtown Estes Park, do you visit during: (Select all that apply.) Upling- - 91.1% (319) Summer 92.9% (325) -- I - - Lpall' 94.6%.(331)_ . 1 Winter 85.7% (300) [Tdon't visit Downtown Estes Park 0.1% (1) It's important to note here that residents and visitors both are coming to Downtown Estes Park year- round, yet there is not a strong amount of programming and activity throughout the winter months to provide them with something to do. This suggests that even a small amount of activation could pay big dividends in increasing year-round use of both downtown and Bond Park. How frequently do you use/visit Bond Park: (Select one.) L[laiy 6.3%422)___ I Weekly 18.7% (65) - LMonthly 11.5% (40) A few times per year 60.1% (209) 1 Never 3.4% (12) What do you do when you visit Bond Park? (Select all that apply.) l Attend an event. 87.4% (305) ,.-- 1 Relax 37.5% (131) LWildlife viewing - 19.8%~(69) Use lawn area for recreation 12.6% (44) 1 Take children.there.to play_ Â§.ej?9) Picnic 5.4% (19) fLdonot visit the park 3.2% (11) -1 Other responses included: â€¢ Walk dogs â€¢ Cross the lawn as a shortcut to town hall â€¢ Reading, drawing, relaxing â€¢ Use the park as a walk-through â€¢ Enjoy the beauty of the open space â€¢ Don't really use the park because there is â€¢ Visit with locals, tourists nothing of interest there x Of note here are a few cross-tabulation variations, including: â€¢ Visitors noted that they primarily visit the park to relax, over using it to attend events â€¢ Respondents with children noted strongly that they take their children to the park to play (25% ) and use the lawn area for recreation (20%), ranking these two items higher than overall respondents. Given the high general visitation to downtown, use of Bond Park is relatively low, with the majority of respondents visiting only a few times per year, and it appears most of those visits are currently related to events. Very few individuals are using the park recreationally when events are not occurring. Some respondents noted they enjoy walking their dogs through the park and sometimes use it as a meeting space, however there were equal number of responses from folks who noted that they primarily use Bond Park as a shortcut to town hall and a walk-through to get from point A to B. Which of the following events have you attended in Bond Park (Select all that apply.) LArts-andcrafts-Market(Â¥L 86.4% (305) i Elk Fest 60.3% (213) - --- l.8-ulumn Gold Fest/Beer, Brats and Bands 5111â‚¬(295) Scandinavian Festival 52.4% (185) Car Show(s) 48.2% (170) - Cowboy Sing Alongs 42.2% (149) Heritage Festival 41.3%.(146) . J I don't attend any events in Bond Park 4.2% (15) 1-Rids Fun Run 2.8% (10j 1 Most all of the events currently programmed in Bond Park are well attended, and the support for events is strong throughout the survey results. However, many comments also suggest that both current and future events need to be more thoughtfully executed to ensure care and preservation of Bond Park as an asset forthe community. When using Bond Park, how do you get there? (Select all that apply.) 11/wedrive a vehicle to Bond Park 69.1% (244) - I/we walk to Bond Park 50.1% (177) LI/Ove bike to Bond:Faik 9.6% (34) .- 1/we currently do not use Bond Park 2.8% (10) x Of note here is one cross-tabulation variation: â€¢ Respondents ages 18-29 and 30-44 responded that they primarily walk to the park â€¢ Respondents ages 45-59 and 60+ responded that they primarily drive Clearly, a thoughtful park redesign needs to address access in several capacities, by parking for cars, and access by pedestrian and bike, since population differences mark different approaches to how the park is and will be used. Provide three words you feel describe Bond Park as it exists today: ~__green, acommurlity gathering spotthat is convenient and accessible. A central location/focal point for the conimunity. A draw to keep people downtown, a civic 2. Open, green and grassy. A peaceful, pleasant oasis that it sereneLand welcoming. ~ 3. Barren, bland and-boring, the park is dated, empty, lacking in aesthetics and uninviting. The amenities are abused and the park looks cluttered. All the activity makes it appear congested, cramped, crowded and overburdened. There were over 900 words or phrases generated in response to this question, many of them repetitive and similar, or complimentary. In general, the ideas could be summed up in these three bundles of thoughts. Respondents see the parktruly as a centerpiece and gathering place for the community AND visitors and they appreciate that green, natural space still exists within the bustling downtown, environment. However, respondents feel that the "shine" has left the park, that it is a beautiful amenity that should be refreshed and reinvigorated. SECTION 2: PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE OF BOND PARK Among the many goals for this survey was to actively involve the community in planning for the future of Bond Park. To that end, a significant focus of the survey was on asking the community to identify important priorities for the future development of the park. The following survey results highlight key concepts and ideas that should be considered in the creation of the Bond Park Master Plan. When redeveloping Bond Park, what is MOST IMPORTANT to you? (Select one.) ~ A user-friendly space that welcomes and invites 36.3% (120) Lactivity from people.of all ages. A space that can play host to Town gatherings 27.2% (90) and events. -- A'beautiful sliace that is a showpiece forthe 23.3% (77) Town. A place that connects the Town to its historical 7.3% (24) rdots. Other responses: â€¢ The park should be a place to escape â€¢ Create year-round activity with amenities for people to enjoy â€¢ A good design should be able to accomplish all of these things ~ â€¢ Open space and greenery are important â€¢ Provide an amenity for town citizens and visitors both â€¢ Keep the space visually open in the midst ottraffic and people congestion â€¢ Less is more When asked to select ONE of the four main focuses above for Bond Park, respondents chose "a user- friendly space that welcomes and invites activity from people of all ages, although the ability to host gatherings and events and create a "showpiece" for the town ranked not far behind. The open responses backed these results, with comments noting a need to keep the park-space flexible and usable by a variety of constituencies. What amenities are most important to you in redesigning Bond Park: (Select all that apply.) 132pengrass areas 69.59.(00)-Plaza.. _23.6%(78) Sitting/viewing areas 68.6% (227) Stage 22.4% (74) (benches/tables) LLaAdscaping _ 59.2% (196) Improved lighting 19.2%16Â§) - 1 Drinking fountains 47.4% (157) Ice rink 16.3% (54) Restored natural areas _ 116% (118) Bicycle racks_ 15.7%(52) - Decorative water feature/fountain 32.6% (108) Picnic amenities 12.1% (40) (shelters, tables, grills) Lsculpturfga[den(rock/artwork)__29%-(91)--playgmuÂ®_teatures_ _ 7.6% (25) _ Historical elements 26.9% (89) Bbcce ball, lawn 3% (10) bowling, horse shoe pits --- Other responses include: â€¢ Bandstand/gazebo in addition to the . Walkways that are people friendly, stage protect the landscape, allow for special Â· â€¢ Gas fire pit with benches events â€¢ Xeriscape gardens â€¢ Sculpture garden â€¢ Mature trees/spruce trees that can be lit â€¢ Stronger, more reliable electrical outlets in winter for vendors/events â€¢ Toilets â€¢ Water fountain for dogs! â€¢ Information station, area â€¢ Protection from wind, sun and shade Respondents were presented with a variety of potential amenities that could be included in the park redesign, and will allowed to select as many of the amenities that they felt were important for inclusion in the redesign. Of the 16 amenities listed, three emerged as important: open grass areas, sitting and viewing areas (including benches and tables), and landscaping. In addition, some strong ideas emerged in the nearly 70 write-in responses that individuals offered. What events or programming would you like to see in Bond Park in the future? â€¢ Arts events â€¢ Music events, small musical performances â€¢ More gatherings for the community â€¢ Year-round events and recreation opportunities, including an ice-skating rink in the winter I â€¢ Movies in the park â€¢ Government forums and educational programming, historical talks â€¢ Farmer's market â€¢ More family-friendly events It's clear that events are and important part of the "culture" of Bond Park, and will be an important part of how it's used going forward. What's interesting from the responses to the write-in question, however, are the nature of the events folks would like to see, which primarily include smaller, more intimate scale events which serve to gather the community and respect the aesthetics of the park. Generally speaking, how would you MOST prefer to use Bond Park? (Please select one.) Passive Use (sitting areas, 53.5% (174) |.19ndscaping/gardening,_pinics,ft-(E) Active Use (event spaces, playground features, 32.9% (107) bocce ball, etc.) - Preserve Use (natural resource management, no 13.5% (44) development of amenities) x One cross-tabulation differentiator of note here: â€¢ Individuals with children were nearly tied in their response between passive use and active use Respondents were forced to chose one of the three options noted above in regards to how they would MOST prefer to use Bond Park in the future as part of the Master Plan process. Most individuals chose a passive use for the park, consistent with many of the other survey responses gathered as part of this process. Community survey respondents appear to value the ability to have an open, user-friendly, flexible park space that is not too over-programmed. What is the number one way Bond Park can be improved? â€¢ Transform it to a sustainable location for events that looks nice year-round â€¢ Improve the overall aesthetics. â€¢ Create an inviting place for residents and visitors to meet, relax, socialize and picnic or enjoy/conduct events. Don't clutter it. â€¢ Ensure it is a multi-use, all-season facility. â€¢ Provide a transitional zone between the street and the interior space of the park. â€¢ Lift the quality of design in a way that is recognizable as being distinctive to Estes Park and its natural setting. â€¢ Expand the park by closing off the street on the north side and replace the street with a more grass and a sidewalk. â€¢ Make it a resting area from everyday life...where families can sit and enjoy themselves for free. This write-in question generated nearly 250 responses, and the results noted here are a summary of key points. Again, the write-in responses reinforced other findings in the survey that the park remains sustainable, flexible, inviting, green and a gathering space for the community. SECTION 3: IMPROVING THE PARK The final section of the survey probed the community's willingness to support a redevelopment of Bond Park. Individuals who took the survey responded in the following way: . Do you support a thoughtful redesign and renovation of Bond Park by the Town of Estes Park? lies . - _38% (126) Depends on the design 51.8% (172) 1_No 10.2%.(34) Comments: â€¢ "Thoughtful" must mean keeping the â€¢ Cost and ongoing maintenance are major park so entertainment and festivals that factors in support. Estes is known for can still occur. These â€¢ Limit too many permanent structures and activities do draw people to the keep it simple and easily adaptable. community! They eat, stay overnight, â€¢ Bond Park should be a statement about and shop'downtown! the culture of Estes Park. â€¢ As a feature in the downtown business â€¢ I don't want to see it filled with concrete district, the park should be an asset to ,as it is the only GREEN spot in downtown the primary purpose of the downtown. and this is important in many ways. â€¢ Classy and high end redesign with r improved landscaping and public art would be supported. In general, the majority of respondents are supportive of a redesign of Bond Park, with most community members stating that the design needs to be thoughtful and meaningful before the plan will get their full support. To that end, the comments that were included in the open-ended Pesponses section are issues that the plan must respond to. Implementing a redesign and renovation of Bond Park will require significant resources. Do you think the resources should come from: LJhe public sector, primarily 29'75 (93) The private sector, primarily 4.2% (13) LA combinatidn of public and private funds 54.3% (170) Other comments: â€¢ If we keep it simple, resources should be â€¢ This could be a great project for EPURA readily available from our general â€¢ Use a combination of municipal bonds maintenance budget. Also, why not let a and existing maintenance dollars few of the many service clubs and â€¢ Explore resources available from the LMD organizations offer their support with â€¢ Consider grant funds, donations plantings, shrubbery, etc? â€¢ Civic pride can be a lever for a jointly- â€¢ Add a small increase for tax collection on funded, public-private-project restaurants and stores downtown. The store owners downtown would benefit the most from the improvements, so have them collect the small tax increase. This question was asked of survey respondents to determine the community's willingness to financially 4 support a redesign of Bond Park. Respondents not only demonstrated that they feel that both the public and private sectors must come to the table to support the redevelopment of Bond Park, but also offered some interesting financing suggestions which should be explored as part of an overall funding package for Bond Park. Do you think improvements to Bond Park will increase usage of the park and ultimately benefit Downtown Estes Park? Yes 59.6% (198) I No 11.4% (38) Lwaybe - 28.9% (16) Comments: â€¢ If the park is able to attract year-round â€¢ Any change will no doubt shift the activity, that will be a benefit demographics of its usage. Simply â€¢ Anytime we provide tourists the increasing traffic should not be the goal - opportunity to embrace a memorable much of its "usage" now involves moment we increase the chances of their enjoying the view of it or through it. return Development and improvement are not â€¢ Adding interest to the park will in turn necessarily synonymous. Whether bring more people downtown to spend development would benefit Downtown money. may be a matter of definition; the way â€¢ Most people driving into Estes for the first Bond Park is now helps restrain the pace time (especially on weekends) are so of life and anything that reduces this confused by our inadequate signage that effect may not ultimately be a positive they are often dazed by the time they thing for the people who visit the area. manage to get onto Elkhorn Avenue. If Many people who visit Estes Park there is a commercial "event" going on, it appreciate its small-town charm; that makes their entrance irito the town just charm is lost as more things are that much more hectic and confusing. We developed and given a slick, polished must start with the early welcome signs, look. notices about free shuttles and outlying parking, etc., BEFORE they get to the "bottleneck" of the Bond Park area. The majority of respondents feel that improving the park ultimately will be beneficial to Downtown Estes Park, as long as the redevelopment is done thoughtfully keeping the thematic tie of downtown today tied throughout the design of the park. Are there memorable parks you've visited elsewhere that have elements you'd like considered in Bond Park? Colorado Parks â€¢ Benson Sculpture Park in Loveland, CO â€¢ Roosevelt Park in Longmont, CO: Covered pavilion that is converted to an ice rink in the winter (concerts in the summer, skating in the winter, revenue generating), activity pool for kids, grass and rose garden - a great park! â€¢ Aspen, CO: Very nice children's play area and a landscaped rest from the bustle of downtown- but right downtown. â€¢ Winter Park, CO's Amphitheater â€¢ Riverfront Park in Salida, CO: Has lots of green grass to sit in, which is rare in our desert landscape. Good shade trees and music facilities. â€¢ Family splash area in Downtown Colorado Springs, CO â€¢ Breckenridge, CO: Downtown plaza is nice. â€¢ Beaver Meadows Visitor Center at Rocky Mountain National Park has a nice plaza with an ' information kiosk and benches. â€¢ Grandlake â€¢ Steamboat Springs, CO, has several downtown parks as well as along the river that flows through Town. These parks invite people to "hang out" â€¢ Acacia Park in Colorado Springs, CO: Uncle Wilber fountain splash play area â€¢ Greeley, CO, has recently redesigned Lincoln Park. â€¢ Frisco, CO, has a beautiful park in the center of town that is used for many purposes Other Parks â€¢ Prospect Park in Brooklyn, NY: Grassy areas, contemplative spots, trees, open play areas, , paths for walking, labels for plant names â€¢ Jackson Hole, WY: Has the elk antler arches that are known world-wide. Develop some landscape feature that speaks to our western heritage and our abundant wildlife (elk). â€¢ There is a nice park on the main street in Jackson, WY. Wildflower gardens, western shoot- outs in the summer... weekend events. - I This'question was asked to determine what parks, both locally and otherwise, community members identify with and to get a sense of what respondents look for and enjoy in a park setting. These findings will be used in the development of conceptual ideas for Bond Park. SUMMARY This survey provides tremendous information for the community and the consultant team as they move forward towards creating conceptual ideas for the Bond Park Master plan. The ideas found within these survey results will be brought together with findings from the community outreach process to ensure the Bond Park concepts meet the needs and hopes of the Estes Park community. Y h . BOND PARK MASTER PLAN INITIAL CONCEPTS REPORT FINAL DRAFT - AUGUST 7,2009 In June of 2009, the consulting team of Winston Associates, Inc. and Progressive Urban Management Associates, Inc. was chosen to develop the Bond Park Master Plan for the Town of Estes Park. The consultants were engaged to undertake significant public outreach as part of the initial development process, including stakeholder forums and a community survey, to identify priorities, concerns and conceptual ideas for the future of Bond Park. A detailed summary of the forums and the survey results are included as attachments to this report. Several key points emerged from this significant public outreach process that must remain central to the Bond Park redesign process. This Initial Concepts Report is intended to summarize those key points in an effort to draw attention to their importance, and to clarify their meaning and provide context in how they can and should be implemented into the ultimate conceptual design for the park. Overall Park Design The following elements should be encompassed in the overall design of the park: â€¢ Sustainab/e: The park design needs to be sustainable, one that looks inviting and polished year-round and that can still accommodate the traffic generated by visitors and events. It must "wear well". It should be a multi-use, bll-season facility. â€¢ Community Centerpiece: Bond Park should be maintained as the centerpiece for the community. When asked to describe Bond Park today, the majority of respondents noted they thought of the park in this way. The design should respect the history and character of the community, and the park's placement as the only green space in the midst of a bustling business district. â€¢ Support the Downtown Business District: Every decision made about the design and programming must be made with the downtown business district in mind. Bond Park should be an amenity of, and asset to, the business district in Downtown Estes Park. â€¢ Create a Tie to the Natural Setting of Estes Park: One of the survey respondents said it best - "the quality of design in Bond Park should be recognizable as being distinctive to Estes Park and its natural setting." Many individuals in both the forums and the focus groups discussed the importance of retaining views and incorporating plantings and amenities to the park that are indigenous to the area, and to creating a design that is "undeniably Estes Park." Among the many important aspects of the park, 20% of respondents to the survey noted they currently come to the park for wildlife viewing. This type of activity should continue to be welcomed and encouraged. Key Park Uses Many uses of the park were suggested throughout the public outreach process. Ultimately, the following should be considered the key uses of the park going forward, and the design should reflect these uses: â€¢ Maintain Bond Park for Primarily "Passive Use": There is a strong desire to keep Bond Park a space dedicated to primarily passive use, in fact nearly 40% of users note this is currently how they use the park. 70% of respondents ranked open grass areas as the top amenity important in the redesign of Bond Park, while just a few less ranked sitting and viewing areas, including benches and tables, as important. Landscaping that's visually appealing rounded out the top three. This is a key paradox the consultant team faces in the redesign of Bond Park. While stakeholders and the community noted a strong desire to maintain a green, open space, the intensive level use seen by Bond Park makes sustaining that layout very difficult if not impossible. Creative design and the use of more plantings and landscaping may be one way to retain "green" while creating a terrain that can hold up to the use and the elements, but ultimately this is a decision that the community and the town will face in regards to maintenance. , Additionally, the community and stakeholders noted a strong desire to retain Bond Park as a place that is flexible and open for many uses and to avoid too many permanent structures that would limit its adaptability. â€¢ The Park Must Still be a "Home" for Community Events: Among the biggest dilemmas encountered during the public outreach for the park redesign was whether the park should continue to play host to special events. Ultimately, as the only public gathering space in the heart of the town, events are a part of the park's history and will be a part of the park's future (respondents noted events are currently the #1 reason they use the park). Instead of asking "\f" events should continue in Bond Park, the question now becomes "how" the park design can support events. Clearly, the current design and configuration is not working for all parties. While event organizers like the flexibility and ease of set-up, the grass cannot survive this level of use and is expensive to replace every three to four years. Community members noted in the survey the park constantly looks overburdened by the size of events being held in the park and the number of people usingthe space at once. Going forward, the Bond Park Master Plan will need to address a better configuration for events, Which may or may not include: x Expanding the park boundaries to create more space for event set-up on the perimeter of the park thereby allowing preservation of more open space in the middle of the park x Creating a better design and configuration for existing events including different materials underfoot and built-in areas for performances x Restricting the size of events that are allowed to be held in the park, allowing only smaller community-scale events to be hosted at Bond Park and having other events move to one of the various event venues throughout the community The continued design process will look at all of the options, and ultimately the community will need to determine their preferences for park use in regard to events. Park Programming *~ As addressed in the park uses section above, events will continue to be a part of the park's key offerings, but the way events are pre'sented in the park must be well thought-out. In addition to carefully evaluating current offerings, community members and stakeholders made the following suggestions for programming Bond Park in the future: â€¢ Smaller, Community Focused Events: Stakeholders and community members are interested in seeing more events focused on bringing the community together as well as events that are family-friendly, including small musical performances, art gatherings, movies in the park, farmer's markets, etc. â€¢ year-Round Activation: It's clear that finding ways to activate Bond Park year-round is a big opportunity area. Currently, there are very few activities that take place in downtown (and none in the park) between fall and spring. Year-round activation can address this by adding elements that invite activity during the winter months (fire pits, ice skating rink, better lighting) and by programming new activities and events (ice sculptures, snow shoeing, holiday lighting and festivals, etc.) that bring both locals and visitors to downtown and the park. This, in turn, helps to support the downtown business district as well. â€¢ Civic Square Programming: The parks proximity to Town Hall and the library naturally create a tie to the old-time philosophy of park as civic square. Several forum attendees and survey respondents suggested heightening civic activity in the park, including hosting government forums, educational programming and historical talks/displays. This Initial Concepts Report attempts to summarize the key ideas heard throughout the public outreach process. The following documents outline more specific ideak gleaned from the public forums and surveys. . BOND PARK MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS FINAL DRAFT - AUGUST 6,2009 In July 2009, the Town of Estes Park surveyed the community, residents and visitors to determine their priorities for a thoughtful redesign of Bond Park in an effort to make it a more user friendly space. The survey generated 356 responses and provided meaningful input into the Bond Park Master Plan design process. The survey was distributed via advertisements in the town newspaper and via direct email solicitation to dozens of local community organizations. The following summarizes the demographic make-up of the respondents to the survey: Home Zip Code: L8051-7- Estes Park, CO 89.5% (290) 80634 - Greeley, CO Â· 1.2% (4) 80532 -Glen Have),CO 3% (3) 80504 - Longmont, CO .6% (2) .- I 80510 - Allenspark, CO .6% (2) 80512 - Bellvue, CO .6% (2) 1 80515 - Drake,-CO .6% (2) 80537 - Loveland, CO .6% (2) 1 8053-8--Loveland,CO .6% (2) 1 -1 Other zip codes (1 respondent from each): â€¢ 34684 - Palm Harbor, FL = 76205 -Denton, TX â€¢ 63119 - Saint Louis, MO â€¢ 76262 - Roanoke, TX â€¢ 64105 - Kansas City, MO â€¢ 80212 - Denver, CO â€¢ 68118 - Omaha, NE = 80302 - Boulder, CO â€¢ 68801 - Grand Island, NE â€¢ 80516 - Erie, CO â€¢ 69024 - Culbertson, NE â€¢ 80525 - Fort Collins, CO â€¢ 72113 - Maumelle, AR â€¢ 85248 - Chandler, AZ â€¢ 72401 - Jonesboro, AR Are you a: ~-Full-time resident of Est#s.Park 84.8% (278) 1 Part-time resident of Estes Park 9.8% (32) Estes ParkVisitor 5.5561 18) .- 1 Including yourselt how many... L--_- 0 1 2 3 4 5+ 1 Adults reside in your household? .9% 14.3% 77.3% 3.1% 4.3% 0% (3) (46) (249) (10) (14) (0) Children under 18 reside in your household? - 65% 15.7% 12.7% 4.1070- 1% - i.&971 (128) (31) (25) (8) (2) (3) | Age of respondent: Under 18 0%.(0) 18-29 2.5% (8). . 30-44 - 16.69;1531 45-59 42% (134) 160+ - 38.9% (124) Gender of respondent: LMale 46.6% (146) Female 53.4% (167) In this community survey, respondents were asked questions about Bond Park today, were asked to provide input and ideas on planning for the future of Bond Park, and were given ah opportunity to identify how best to implement any improvements. In addition to summarizing the aggregate score of all the respondents, the findings have also been cross-tabulated by: â€¢ Whether the respondent is a full-time resident of Estes Park, part-time resident, or visitor â€¢ Whether the respondent does or does not have children under the age of 18 ' â€¢ The age of the respondent Where there were significant and important variations in these cross-tabbed results, the variances have been noted below each question summary. The following pages highlight, by section, responses to each of the questions asked in the community survey about Bond Park. SECTION 1: BOND PARK TODAY The first section of the survey asked respondents questions about the current state of the park, their perceptions of the image of the park, and how they use Bond Park as well as Downtown Estes Park. The questions probed thoughts on the aesthetics and appearance of the park as well as what draws users to the park. The responses are as follows: How frequently do you visit Downtown Estes Park? (Select one.) , Daily _ _45.1% (158) Weekly 34% (119) LMonthly 10.3.% (36) A few times per year 10.6% (37) . 1 Never 0.0% (0) I , Downtown Estes Park has extraordinary user-ship. It's unique fo find this high of visitation in the downtown with such frequency. This information is important for both the purposes of this survey, and forthe businesses in the downtown area. When you visit Downtown Estes Park, do you visit during: (Select all that apply.) 1.480!g- 91.1% (112) - . I Summer 92.9% (325) -- 1 - Fall 9-4.6% (531) Winter 85.7% (300) I don't visit bowntown Estes Park - 01%-(1) ' j It's important to note here that residents and visitors both are coming to Downtown Estes Park year- round, yet there is not a strong amount of programming and activity throughout the winter months to provide them with something to do. This suggests that even a small amount of activation could pay big dividends in increasing year-round use of both downtown and Bond Park. How frequently do you use/visit Bond Park: (Select one.) LRally 6.3% (22) 1 Weekly 18.7% (65) LMonthly 11.5% (40)_ _ , A few times per year 60.1% (209) . 1 Never 3.496 (12) - I What do you do when you visit Bond Park? (Select all that apply.) | Attend.anevent 87.4%(305) - Relax 37.5% (131) Wildlife-viewing 19.8% (69) --= 1 Use lawn area for recreation 12.6% (44) Take children there toplay - 8.6% (30) 1 1 Picnic 5.4% (19) i ldo not visit the park . I i.241(111 Other responses included: â€¢ Walk dogs â€¢ Cross the lawn as a shortcut to town hall â€¢ Reading, drawing, relaxing â€¢ Use the park as a walk-through â€¢ Enjoy the beauty of the open space â€¢ Don't really use the park because there is â€¢ Visit with locals, tourists nothing of interest there x Of note here are a few cross-tabulation variations, including: â€¢ Visitors noted that they primarily visit the park to relax, over using it to attend events â€¢ Respondents with children noted strongly that they take their children to the park to play (25% ) and use the lawn area for recreation (20%), ranking these two items higher than overall respondents. Given the high general visitation to downtown, use of Bond Park is relatively low, with the majority of respondents visiting only a few times per year, and it appears most of those visits are currently related to events. Very few individuals are using the park recreationally when events are not occurring. Some respondents noted they enjoy walking their dogs through the park and sometimes use it as a meeting space, however there were equal number of responses from folks who noted that they primarily use Bond Park as a shortcut to town hall and a walk-through to get from point A to B. Which of the following events have you attended in Bond Park (Select all that apply.) Arts and Crafts-Market(s) 86.4% (305) Elk Fest 60.3% (213) LAutumn Gold Fest/Beer, Brats and Bands 58.1% (205) - .-IJ Scandinavian Festival 52.4% (185) --1 Car Showfs) 48.2% (170) Cowboy Sing Alongs 42.2% (149) LHeritage Festival 4i.4% (146) --1 I don't attend any events in Bond Park ~ 4.2% (15) Kids #un Run 2.8% (10) | Most all of the events currently programmed in Bond Park are well attended, and the support for events is strong throughout the survey results. However, many comments also suggest that both current and future events need to be more thoughtfully executed to ensure care and preservation of Bond Park as an asset for the community. When using Bond Park, hbw do you get there? (Select all that apply.) 1/we drive a_vehicle-to Bond_gark 69.1% (244) 1/we walk to Bond Park 50.1% (177) U/we bike to Bond Park .9.6% (34) | 1/we currently do'not use Bond Park 2.8% (10) * Of note here is one cross-tabulation variation: â€¢ Respondents ages 18-29 and 30-44 responded that they primarily walk to the park â€¢ Respondents ages 45-59 and 60+ responded that they primarily drive Clearly, a thoughtful park redesign needs to address access in several capacities, by parking for cars, and access by pedestrian and bike, since population differences mark different approaches to how the park is and will be used. Provide three words you feel describe Bond Park as it exists today: 1. A central location/focal point for the community. A draw to keep people downtown, a civic green, a community gat!lelinglpot that is convenient and accessible. 2. Open, green and grassy. A peaceful, pleasant oasis that it serene and welcoming. 3. Barren, bland and boring, the park is dated, empty, lacking in aesthetics and uninviting. The amenities are abused and the park looks cluttered. All the activity makes it appear congested, cramped, crowded and overburdened. There were over 900 words or phrases generated in response to this question, many of them repetitive and similar, or complimentary. In general, the ideas could be summed up in these three bundles of thoughts. Respondents see the park truly as a centerpiece and gathering place for the community AND visitors and they appreciate that green, natural space still exists within the bustling downtown environment. However, respondents feel that the "shine" has left the park, that it is a beautiful amenity that should be refreshed and reinvigorated. , SECTION 2: PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE OF BOND PARK Among the many goals for this survey was to actively involve the community in planning for the future of Bond Park. To that end, a significant focus of the survey was on asking the community to identify important priorities for the future development of the park. The following survey results highlight key concepts and ideas that should be considered in the creation of the Bond Park Master Plan. When redeveloping Bond Park, what is MOST IMPORTANT to you? (Select one.) A user-friendly space that welcomes and invites 36.3% (120) L,ctivity from people of all ages. -I - -. A space that can play host to Town gatherings 27.2% (90) and events. A beautiful si,ace th-at is a sho,@piece for the 23.3% (77) _Town. A place that connects the Town to its historical 7.3% (24) roots. Other responses: â€¢ The park should be a place to escape â€¢ Create year-round activity with amenities for people to enjoy â€¢ A good design should be able to accomplish all of these things â€¢ Open space and greenery are important â€¢ Provide an amenity for town citizens and visitors both â€¢ Keep the space visually open in the midst of traffic and people congestion â€¢ Less is more When asked to select ONE of the four main focuses above for Bond Park, respondents chose "a user- friendly space that welcomes and invites activity from people of all ages, although the ability to host gatherings and events and create a "showpiece" for the town ranked not far behind. The open responses backed these results, with comments noting a need to keep the park-space flexible and usable by a variety of constituencies. What amenities are most important to you in redesigning Bond Park: (Select all that apply.) U?pengrass areas 69.5% (230) Plaza 23.6% (78) Sitting/viewing areas 68.6% (227) Stage 22.4% (74) f (benches/tables) _Landscaping Rt.ZE.(196)-IMPERved-Ijghti!1g . -19.996.(66) Drinking fountains 47.4% (157) Ice rink 16.3% (54) LRestored natural areas - -35;6%,(118) Bicycle racks - 15,7% (52) Decorative water fealufe/fountain 32.6% (108) Picnic amenities ~ 12.1% (40) , (shelters, tables, grills) , LSculpture garden (rock/artwork) 29% (96) . _Playground features 7.6% (25) Historical elements 26.9% (89) Bocce ball, lawn 3% (10) bowling, horse shoe pits . ~ Other responses include: â€¢ Bandstand/gazebo in addition to the â€¢ Walkways that are people friendly, stage protect the landscape, allow for special â€¢ Gas fire pit with benches events â€¢ Xeriscape gardens â€¢ Sculpture garden â€¢ Mature trees/spruce trees that can be lit â€¢ Stronger, more reliable electrical outlets ' nwinter for vendors/events â€¢ Toilets â€¢ Water fountain for dogs! â€¢ Information station, area â€¢ Protection from wind, sun and shade Respondents were presented with a variety of potential amenities that could be included in the park redesign, and will allowed to select as many of the amenities that they felt were important for inclusion in the redesign. Of the 16 amenities listed, three emerged as important: open grass areas, sitting and viewing areas (including benches and tables), and landscaping. In addition, some strong ideas emerged in the nearly 70 write-in responses that individuals offered. What events or programming would you like to see in Bond Park in the future? â€¢ Arts events | 7 Music events, small musical performances â€¢ More gatherings for the community â€¢ Year-round events and recreation opportunities, including an ice-skating rink in the winter â€¢ Movies in the park â€¢ Government forums and educational programming, historical talks â€¢ Farmer's market â€¢ More family-friendly events It's clear that events are and important part of the "culture" of Bond Park, and will be an important part of how it's used going forward. What's interesting from the responses to the write-in question, however, are the nature of the events folks would like to see, which primarily include smaller, more intimate scale events which serve to gather the community and respect the aesthetics of the park. Generally speaking, how would you MOST prefer to use Bond Park? (Please select one.) ' Passive Use (sitting areas, 53.5% (174) landscaping/gardining, picnics, etc.) Active Use (event spaces, playground features, 32.9% (107) bocce ball, etc.) Preserve Use (natural resource management, no 13.5% (44) development of amenities) x One cross-tabulation differentiator of note here: â€¢ Individuals with children were nearly tied in their response between passive use and active use Respondents were forced to chose one of the three options noted above in regards to how they would MOST prefer to use Bond Park in the future as part of the Master Plan process. Most individuals chose a passive use for the park, consistent with many of the other survey responses gathered as part of this process. Community survey respondents appear to value the ability to have an open, user-friendly, flexible park space that is not too over-programmed. What is the number one way Bond Park can be improved? â€¢ Transform it to a sustainable location for events that looks nice year-round â€¢ Improve the overall aesthetics. â€¢ Create an inviting place for residents and visitors to meet, relax, socialize and picnic or enjoy/conduct events. Don't clutter it. â€¢ Ensure it is'a multi-use, all-season facility. â€¢ Provide a transitional zone between the street and the interior space of the park. â€¢ Lift the quality of design in a way that is recognizable as being distinctive to Estes Park and its natural setting. â€¢ Expand the park byclosing off the street on the north side and replace the street with a more grass and a sidewalk. â€¢ Make it a resting area from everyday life...where families can sit and enjoy themselves for free. This write-in question generated nearly 250 responses, and the results noted here are a summary of key points. Again, the write-in responses reinforced other findings in the survey that the park remains sustainable, flexible, inviting, green and a gathering space for the community. SECTION 3: IMPROVING THE PARK The final section of the survey probed the community's willingness to support a redevelopment of Bond Park. Individuals who took the survey responded in the following way: Do you support a thoughtful redesign and renovation of Bond Park by the Town of Estes Park? LXRL_ 38% (126) . - Depends on the design ' 51.8% (172) 1 ! No . E.2% (34) Comments: â€¢ "Thoughtful" must mean keeping the â€¢ Cost and ongoing maintenance are major park so entertainment and festivals that factors in support. Estes is known for can still occur. These â€¢ Limit too many permanent structures and activities do draw people to the keep it simple and easily adaptable. community! They eat, stay overnight, â€¢ Bond Park should be a statement about and shop downtown! the culture of Estes Park. â€¢ As a feature in the downtown business â€¢ I don't want to see it filled with concrete district, the park should be an asset to as it is the only GREEN spot in downtown the primary purpose of the downtown. and this is important in many ways. â€¢ Classy and high end redesign with improved landscaping and public art would be supported. In general, the majority of respondents 3re supportive of a redesign of Bond Park, with most community members stating that the design needs to be thoughtful and meaningful before the plan will get their full support. To that end, the comments that were included in the open-ended responses section are issues that the plan must respond to. Implementing a redesign and renovation of Bond Park will require significant resources. Do you think the resources should come from: 1 The ~ublic sector,.primarily _ (93) -1 Thd private sector, primarily . 4.2% (13) L*jqnbination of public and ptivate 1@inds _ - 54.3% (170). -71 Other comments: â€¢ If we keep it simple, resources should be â€¢ This could be a great project for EPURA readily available from our general â€¢ Use a combination of municipal bonds maintenance budget. Also, why not let a and existing maintenance dollars few of the many service clubs and â€¢ Explore resources available from the LMD organizations offer their support with â€¢ Consider grant funds, donations plantings, shrubbery, etc? â€¢ Civic pride can be a lever for a jointly- â€¢ Add a small increase for tax collection on funded, public-private-project restaurants and stores downtown. The store owners downtown would benefit the most from the improvements, so have them collect the small tax increase. This question was asked of survey respondents to determine the community's willingness to financially support a redesign of Bond Park. Respondents not only demonstrated that they feel that both the public ~ and private sectors must come to the table to support the redevelopment of Bond Park, but also offered some interesting financing suggestions which should be explored as part of an overall funding package for Bond Park. Do you think improvements to Bond Park will increase usage of the park and ultimately benefit Downtown Estes Park? Des. 59.6% (198) No 11.4% (38) Llyl*ykf 28.9% (96) Comments: â€¢ If the park is able to attract year-round â€¢ Any change will no doubt shift the activity, that will be a benefit demographics of its usage. Simply â€¢ Anytime we provide tourists the increasing traffic should not be the goal - opportunity to embrace a memorable much of its "usage" now involves moment we increase the chances of their enjoying the view of it or through it. return Development and improvement are not â€¢ Addipg interest to the park will in turn necessarily synonymous. Whether - bring more people downtown to spend development would benefit Downtown money. may be a matter of definition; the way â€¢ Most people driving into Estes for the first Bond Park is now helps restrain the pace time (especially on weekends) are so of life and anything that reduces this confused by our inadequate signage that effect may not ultimately be a positive they are often dazed by the time they thing for the people who visit the area. manage to get onto Elkhorn Avenue. If Many people who visit Estes Park there is a commercial "event" going on, it appreciate its small-town charm; that makes their entrance into the town just charm is lost as more things are that much more hectic and confusing. We developed and given a slick, polished must start with the early welcome signs, look. notices about free shuttles and outlying parking, etc., BEFORE they get to the "bottleneck" of the Bond Park area. The majority of respondents feel that improving the park ultimately will be beneficial to Downtown Estes Park, as long as the redevelopment is done thoughtfully keeping the thematic tie of downtown today tied throughout the design of the park. Are there memorable parks you've visited elsewhere that have elements you'd like considered in Bond Park? '. Colorado Parks â€¢ Benson Sculpture Park in Loveland, CO â€¢ Roosevelt Park in Longmont, CO: Covered pavilion that is converted to an ice rink in the winter (concerts in the summer, skating in the winter, revenue generating), activity pool for kids, grass and rose garden - a great park! â€¢ Aspen, CO: Very nice children's play area and a landscaped rest from the bustlerof downtown- but right downtown. â€¢ Winter Park, CO's Amphitheater â€¢ Riverfront Park in Salida, CO: Has lots of green grass to sit in, which is rare in our desert landscape. Good shade trees and music facilities. â€¢ Family splash area in Downtown Colorado Springs, CO â€¢ Breckenridge, CO: Downtown plaza is nice. â€¢ Beaver Meadows Visitor Center at Rocky Mountain National Park has a nice plaza with an information kiosk and benches. â€¢ Grandlake â€¢ Steamboat Springs, CO, has several downtown parks as well as along the river that flows through Town. These parks invite people to "hang out" 1 â€¢ Acacia Park in Colorado Springs, CO: Uncle Wilber fountain splash play area â€¢ Greeley, CO, has recently redesigned Lincoln Park. â€¢ Frisco, CO, has a beautiful park in the center of town that is used for many purposes Other Parks â€¢ Prospect Park in Brooklyn, NY: Grassy areas, contemplative spots, trees, open play areas, paths for walking, labels for plant names â€¢ Jackson Hole, WY: Has the elk antler arches that are known world-wide. Develop some landscape feature that speaks to our western heritage and our abundant wildlife (elk) â€¢ There is a nice park on the main street in Jackson, WY. Wildflower gardens, western shoot- outs in the summer... weekend events. Thisquestion was asked to determine what parks, both locally and otherwise, community members identify with and to get a sense of what respondents look for and enjoy in a park setting. These findings will be used in the development of conceptual ideas for Bond Park. SUMMARY This survey provides tremendous information for the community and the consultant team as they move forward towards creating conceptual ideas for the Bond Park Master plan. The ideas found within these survey results will be brought together with findings from the community outreach process to ensure the Bpnd Park concepts meet the needs and hopes of the Estes Park community. Estes Park, Colorado Bond Park Master Plan Public Forums July 22,2009 (Prepared by Progressive Urban Management Associates) As part of the Bond Park master planning effort, four workshops were held with town representatives, civic partners, residents, business owners, and other stakeholders to create a vision for the future of Bond Park and to identify potential improvements. 1. Existing Conditions Participants were asked to describe how they see Bond Park today. A summary of the discussion follows: 8:00 AM Meeting 10:00 AM Meeting 1:00 PM Meeting 3:00 PM Meeting Event center Tired Small Dumpy Green space Central Centrally located Neglected Oasis Green Green Downtown beal point Stark Flexible A bit barren Dead tees Game park/wildlife Oasis Non-descript Missing water feabire Used daily Busy Well used Central/accessible Resting location Changing Visible Convenient Inviting Multi-faceted Surrounded by cars Abused - events Meeting point Community resource Not inviting-Doesn't grab you People place Picnic grounds Landmark ~ Historic Maintenance problem Tourist and resident attraction Gathering place for tourists and locals Expensive Events ! Over used/beaten up Safe conic Critical oint of reference own setting Showcase for political causes Unused in winter Historic Shortcut 11. Vision Participants were asked to envision the Bond Park today and how they would like to see it ten to twenty years in the future. A summary of the discussion follows: 8:00 AM Meeting 10:00 AM Meeting 1:00 PM Meeting 3:00 PM Meeting Town square Vibrant Attractive landscape Green - grass, trees Community friendly Accessible to pedestrians Pedestrian crossroads Local gathering place People place Open Easily accessible People place Restful Inviting Utilitarian Quiet, calming Sense of place Versatile Beautiful Classy Multi-functional Green Signature of Estes Park Non-commercial Multi-seasonal Shady Flexible use Open Active Natural Remain focal point Compliment commercial Maintenance friendly Larger presence Community "feel" - ewnts Home to smalle cultural events Prestigous Not a parking lot Maintain perception of green Peaceful Year-round gathering spot More accessible through parking Oasis Beautiful Compliment to existing parks Art Welcoming Family friendly Good stewardship Compliments Downtown , Retains sense of history ompliments the Town Msion een p .elate to open space and other parks 111. Improvements/Priorities Participants were then asked to outline the changes they would like to see to achieve the vision they have for Bond Park. After identifying the changes, they were asked to vote for the ideas they felt would most positively impact the corridor. 8:00 AM Meeting " 10:00 AM Meeting I mprovements Description Score Score Improvements Description Score #2 Baer -Thoughful Enlarge -Use parking lot across the street Â· conÂ®uraion for -Muli-use parking/events park/Incorporate -Pull into riverwalk events -Events should not adjacent parking -Incorporab nabral space 11 overtake park lot 8 -Pavers/creaive hardscaping Â· -Incorporate the Virginia lot Close Lower -Extend park -Remove parking MacGregor -Be aware of barking 10 -Use MacGregor -Temporary parking 0 Open space -Picnic areas Landscape -Bushes -Mobile sea8ng enhancements -Plants labeled -Place b relax 5 -Botanic gardens -Use as civic green -Trees/forest asthedc -Maintain green space -Reinbrce views Move large -Craft fair/car show 7 1 events oubide of -Elk horn lodge 3 -Diverse landscape/plants park -Seasonally pleasant Ice rink -Rernovable 3 Family-friendly -Landscaping act as wind barrier 2 picnic area Sculpbres/art 5 2 Water kature 2 Seating areas -Benches Enhance 3 1 connedon to 1 RMNP Fire pit 3 Park amenities -Seaang walls Remain open -Avoid commercial *feel" -Walkways 3 2 space Consider -Playground material -Cental/high quality experience Pedestrian -Conned b riverwalk alternaive -Synthe#c Wf 2 4 surfaoes connectivv to Ice skaing rink Focal pointbr 2 2 informaion Design that lies H istoric 2 1 into civic complex connecions Performance -Stage 2 1 venue -Bandshell Water Featlre -Fountain 1 2 -Abpealing in wit'~er , Sheler -Architecturally interesung 1 -Wind/rain shelter Connedng to -Renar'ring Bond Park 1 hisbry 1:00 PM Meeting 3:00 PM Meeting Improvements Description Score Score Improvements Description Score Score #2 #2 Remove all parking -Make area a pedestian 8 Landscaping -Holds up b pedestrian trallic priority Shelbr/Pavillion/Ban 5 1 -Open keling dstand Incorpora~ more -Event; -Coninuauon b mountains 4 1 wimer acivilies -Ice rink -Lighing 11 Family friendly -Water play areas -Accessibiliy (ADA) ~atures -Na~ral batures br kids 3 -Mifigate wind Waler feature/Fire pit -Creek ' -Visually open up ton of the 3 3 park Integra5 -To/torn park -Sens#ve b businesses around 2 1 shuttle/tansit -Parking! Expanding park -MacGregor Improvements b -More local event activiN space -Virginia 6 make events user -More electrici4 -Contrlue evenb/not Ii,nit friendly -More a#acive Sncing Permanentstage -Gazebo/bandshell 5 2 2 2 -More permanent facil~es Watr babres 4 2 More public -More permanent signage 4 1 arfsculptire Theme -Hisbric connedons 1 Decorative -Nature -RMNP walkway grid -Connecions b history; hisbry 3 Seaung -Picnic table walk -Benches Ice rink 1 1 Statues/Public art -Flexible art spaces Evenb -Betier setup tker lighjtfg -Increase quality amenities brmaion -Walkway 1 |board/center -Maintain small evenb; keep them manageable -More events/year round Fire pit 3 IV. Implementation/Funding Participants were then asked to brainstorm potential funding sources and revenue streams for the improvements and priorities that were discussed. 8:00 AM Meeting 10:00 AM Meeting 1:00 PM Meeting Avoid BID? GOCO GOCO Partner with recreabn district EPURA User/eventlees Downbwn Development GOCO &Inds? Sales hx Authority Increase user kes br events? BID Communhy reinvestment funds Larimer CounN open Space LMD Enterprise funds Ice rink revenue? Sales tax increase EPURA Grants Increase use taes Ice skaling rink funds? Private sector sponsorhsip Premium parking fees and donabns V. Next Steps â€¢ Digital design charrette ---- August 10, 2009 â€¢ Community open house -- September 2,2009 â€¢ Board of Trustees meeting - September 8,2009 Second community open house ---- October 8, 2009 Review by Board of Trustees ---- November, 2009 â€¢ Final Master Plan -December, 2009 BOND PARK MASTER PLAN - 3 CONCEPT DESIGNS LABOR DAY POLLING RESULTS Town Employee Polling - September 3,2009 A - 9 votes B - 3 votes C - 15 votes 27 total votes A comments B comments C comments t no need for ice skating - View Gâ€ž too expensive & hard to Concept C Like water feature & lack No sculptures - maintain "Bond Park" title For sure an ice skati of stage climbing liability Would like to see one or two move fire pit closer to "play" sculptures traffic pattern, on the for kids - or an Concept A parking west side along Park Lane interesting on MacGregor one- Don't like scolptures - easier for tourists to see fountain to play way & tent layout hard to maintain and do and stop by with. preferred not fit in Estes With parking garage - Stage from Concept No slating rink B Yard art isn't mduntains! Like the water I like the edge of the Eliminate jagged design but would plug in sandstone & make a water feature and gate No water feature, smooth curve (for from concept C please mowing) Timber Archway I Â£ from Plan A in SW Add water feature from C corner No water feature please Shelter/stage moved K to middle of picnic move stage to water Add ice rink from B grove feature location A is optimal for tent set- Stone/concrete of Tents along Park Lane like up plan A to SE corner option A north parking/tent McGregor one-way like Covered shelter from C area of plan A option A Don't put ice rink on grass No water feature, please! Popular Comments from Town Employees The tent layout and one-way configuration of MacGregor in Concept A were the favorite event set-up Four people liked the water features (mainly C), and 3 did not. Two people did not like ice rink or ice rink locations, four people did like the skating rink idea. LABOR DAY WEEKEND POLLING - Sept 4- 7,2009 A - 98 votes B - 133 votes C - 129 votes Total Votes - 358 total votes zip code votes (Estes Park Area = Estes Park, Allenspark, Glen Haven, Drake, Pinewood) A B C Total Zips 39 Estes Park area 67 Estes Park area 71 Estes Park area 177~Estes Park 67.82% 1 Denver 7 Denver 2 Denver 10 Denver 3.83% 1 Boulder 2 Boulder 3 Boulder 1.15% 1 Fort Collins, CO 3 Fort Collins, CO 3 Fort Collins, CO 7 Fort Collins 2.68% 1 Loveland, CO 3 Loveland, CO 4 Loveland 1.53% 2 Louisville, CO 1 Louisville, CO 3 Louisville 1.15% 1 Lafayette, CO 1 Lafayette 0.38% 1 Colorado Springs, CO 2 Colorado Springs 3 Colorado Springs 1.15% 2 Parker, CO 2 Parker 0.77% 1 Laporte, CO 1 Laporte 0.38% 2 Fort Lupton, CO 2 Fort Lupton 0.77% 1 Cope, CO 1 Cope 0.38% 1 Lyons 1 Lyons 1 Lyons 3 Lyons 1.15% 1 Mead, CO 1 Mead 0.38% 1 Akron, CO 1 Akron 0.38% 1 Windsor, CO 1 Windsor, CO 2 Windsor 0.77% I johnstown, CO 1 Johnstown, CO 2 Johnstown 0.77% 1 Cotopaxi, CO 1 Cotopaxi 0.38% 2 Eagle, CO 2 Eagle 0.77% 1 Greeley, CO 1 Greeley, CO 2 Greeley 0.77% 1 Nederland, CO 1 Nederland, CO 2 Nederland 0.77% 2 Aurora, CO 2 Aurora 0.77% 1 Longmont, CO 4 Longmont, CO 5 Longmont 1.92% 1 Arvada, CO 5 Arvada, CO 6 Arvada 2.30% 66 Colorado 25.29% 4 St. Louis, MO 4 St. Louis. MO 1.53% 1 Chicago, IL 1 Chicago, IL 0.38% 1 San Manuel, AZ 1 San Manuel, AZ 0.38% 1 Hiko, NV 1 Hiko, NV 0.38% 2 Chevy Chase, MD 2 Chevy Chase, MD 0.77% 2 Albuquerque, NM 2 Albuquerque 0.77% 1 Chetek, WI 1 Chetek, WI 0.38% 1 Oklahoma City, OK 1 Oklahoma City 0.38% 1 Topeka, KS 1 Topeka, KS 0.38% 2 Texas 2 Texas 0.77% 2 Auxvasse, MO 2 Auxvausse, MO 0.77% 67 Zips for A 91 Zips for B 103 Zips for C - 18 Out of State 6.90% 261 A Comments 1. Do not move existing fire pit. 2. No ice rink 3. Love all the grassy area - LOVE ice rink No covered stage. Little or no change in park. Good size grassy area Ice rink larger You need the diagonal walk as in B. Makes sense! Best solution = no water, music off busy corner. Add: path to Best layout most grass open restrooms; delete: ice rink! Simple geometry; keeps with feeling of Estes dimension & straight-forward nature of mountains I work at the cabin in Bond Park (4th year). Bond Park is primarily a Like the separation of activity area place to run the kids & dogs after being in the car for 15 hours. 1 Gazebo in middle don't like the sidewalk down the middle of the park. A place to skin Consider individuals as sponsors through small $ knees and the people will interrupt the running, football, etc. contributions such as benches, brick work, etc. Like the # of trees!! (a park should have trees) Don't move the Less impact on library, good use of parking Memorial sign on NW corner! Less impact on library Ice rink larger; booths along Elkhorn (not sure on code) Lbveland native loves Estes Ice rink larger Suggest to put Estes Park, USA & Colorado flags in center of park I like this concept best with a few features from Concept B: add a water feature to the corner with Water feature in C will not only cost too much to build but these fire pit and add sea wall around fire pit and also things have high maintenance! Seems to me the river one block away along sidewalk. Very nice for our town. is perfect. I think the placement of vendor locations is better in A than B. Stands in front of library will be orphans. You'd should But I love the "Stonehenge" concept in Plan B. 1 think ice rink would be most pleasing to on-lookers carefully study the possibility of closing Park Lane during events - and skaters by keeping it central and away from city perhaps some changes in the library parking lot can enable this. hall. Keep fire pit near skate rink. Move in some really big rocks & boulders. I like the tents around the curve & in the trees. Love the fire pit Have you thought about using artificial turf instead I think that keeping the information cabin would be a good choice for of grass? No water and would maintain easy the visitors of the park somewhere in the design I like concept A because of its more open space Go with something low maintenance for ground flooring No fire pit. No ice rink. Add water feature similar to plan B also add seating wall similar to Like lots of grass close to Elkhorn. Also like the Plan B. bordering Elkhorn - also seating wall by fire pit. fire ring and lots of trees. More trees, grass, benches & picnic tables - less pavement. Retain the most grassy area. Love the fire pit performing area & the open space in the park. Keep tents & stage away from Town Hall; one way NortR is good! C= too much clutter along Highway. This looks most cost effective * r Popular Comments - Concept A Several people picked this design in part because of the number of trees. The large grassy area made this design a favorite for many of those who provided comments. Several people mentioned that the ice rink should be larger in this design. Tent layout of A was mentioned favorably by people who voted for A, B, and C. B Comments Outstanding idea! Needs more water features - like Plan A w/water Add sculpture garden I like where the ice rink is in relation to the fire, and the sidewalk down the As many trees as possible middle makes the most sense. larger ice rink for winter Skating by the fire! log-style arch entry Yes! Sidewalk through the grass I like B but use C's tent configuration and remove C's water features. Make winter use path for B straight. summer resident - 90 years Like the "natural" boulder gateway & seating along Elkhorn. Like the central love picnic area pathway through the green. Will draw people in the space. Great idea to I like the ice rink close to fire pit repave street to look like a plaza & use for festival tents. Artist tents can be C is cool, too, but I don't like the sculpture garden laid out without so much space - very typical & artists expect it Then maybe visitors less crowed need less paving & NE corner which will be start & bare during non-festival size of fire pit is good times. Small spray play pad might work in this area (off during festivals) to shape of skating rink is good add water element if desired. Stage will be a well used element (water is "C" A timber gate preferred over "Stonehenge" is too much & too forced - there is a natural stream a block away!) A moving water feature would be nice Fire pit by the ice rink is the way to go! Kids sculpture playpen would appeal to families Ice skating rink is a risk, not worth it & is expensive to do with our sun! Kids would love the ice skating Best choice, but the path should be straight - otherwise, people will make Keep seating area - looking good, al views their own shortest path! This option is a great choice for a resort town! Stone performance stage, wildlife walk I liked the central path & larger fire pit. Good place for ice rink. Sidewalk in the middle appealing. Unique shape of ice rink a plus. If an ice skating rink stays at youth center - delete this Lose the fire pit - seems like a big garbage pit all year round. Make ice rink rink. larger. 5 with plan trom L tor permanent event surtace. water No ice skating rink! feature in C seems trite as the river & plaza across the street is the real thing. 1 Like no walk going through lawn Good layout for crafters, please make surface stone brick, stamped concrete in C. Good luck! - NOT dirt or blacktop (too hot). Move Sampson Statue to the park area! Like the tents on front street sidewalk I like the ice skating location and the stone seawall B looks good with places to site & trees & very functional Like the fire pit, great idea to shut down MacGregor & I like ice skating rink by the fire pit - cozy in the winter. use Bus stop for vendors. Like the ice rink location. Center path is good; shape of ice rink However, we like the tent layout of A Like sidewalk going through, like being able to get really close to the stage on the grass. Bigger water feature for this one. Popular Comments - Concept B Many people commented positively on the location of the fire pit (next to the skating rink) Several thought the addition of a sculpture garden for children to climb on would be good Several people like the path through the middle of the park Several commented on the nice trees and places to sit r ' C Comments Imptoved vendor setup Ad access is great I really like all of the features this option includes such as the small Great balanced layout performance stage with waterfall behind it & the sculpture garden I like the ice skating rink! and picnic grove. Nice concept and good addition for the town Wonderful! This one great Ice skating rink nice size; no raised area for kids to get hurt on; "just Love the water feature!. like it" (my six year oldO Love the water feature! It's the water feature that wins for me. I am a vendor and C seems to flow best Beautiful - love the water feature. I am an exhibitor. Each of the options has some This is the one. separated booths that would be "dead" areas, C I like the entry at Elkhorn, but like the ice rinkfrom B better. has less. FYI? Many of us cannot keep a full day's Performing in front of waterfalls is a bad idea. Nix the small inventory in a IOXIO - can you plan for I0XI2? A performance stage. The sound of the falls would come out over the is way too crowded. Love th& fire pits & ice rink! microphones. If no'sound system, acoustic instruments would be Worry about wildlife in summer water features! drowned out. Thanks. Thanks for asking. Keep it simple & keep modern out of it! I feel this option is less intrusive on the bank! Pleahe make sure there are plenty of picnic tables. I live and work Like the water feature. Like the offside walkway as here in town and like to eat my lunch outside. A bench doesn't work opposed to the bisecting one. Getting the booths all that well. off the grass in all plans is wonderful. Love the use of water. Excellent combination of natural and modern , I like the functionality of it while still keeping it elements. aesthetic. We like-the water feature. Very good concept. Very appealing design while very functional purpose Like ice rink & tent locations. Covered areas for performers would - love the water features and picnic grove. , be a good addition. Skip waterfall, must be Xeriscape The water feature carries through the theme of We need the sidewalks from A for the businesses with C's layout. design with the riverwalk. I like the water feature As a local, we like "C" - water features, mountain Please don't sacrifice bus drop for tent space entrance. I do no like the sculptures (especially Omit the modern sculpture - it's not mountain friendly! "Love" etc. Love the plan, but would like the look of more evergreen trees. I like the water feature Like the idea of an in-town ice skating rink & the waterfall area. I like the water feature Like water features I like the water features and the covered The sculpture garden sold me on this plan performance stage. Way to the get the tents off Everything about it is appealing the grass in all designs & ice skating rink for Good water feature and falls with stream. Do not like fire pits Need families. more green areas like A&B I like the water feature & stream in "C". Do not I like the ice skating area. Keeping the tents together so all can like fire pits & need more green like A&B participate equally. Water feature is super and great for town public relations. Fire pit in far corner is probably wasted C is good but the sidewalk.on A is better - so a combination of both space on A&B plans. Also, tents need to be I like C a lot but I like B's ice rink better. clustered, unlike Plan A, for events. On C plan,. A I like the regular oval for skating and then tent area. real plus is lots of seating near the street for visitors. Popular Comments - Concept C The water feature was a big hit on this concept The ice rink shape and size was very popular in this design. About half the people like the sculpture garden, and half didn't It was mentioned several times this layout was the most functional and balanced. WINSTON W MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATES TO: Meeting Attendees FROM: Paul Kuhn, Winston Associates PROJECT: Bond Park Master Plan, Town of Estes Park SUBJECT: Review of Concepts A, B, and C with Stakeholders MEMO DATE: September 28,2009 MEETING DATE: September 16, 2009 ATTENDING: STAKEHOLDERS Bob Joseph (Bob) - TOEP/Community Development Dave Mahany (Dave) - TOEP/Public Works Jerry Miller Gerry) - TOEP/Trustee Ron Norris (Ron) - Estes Valley Planning Commission Kathy Palmeri Kathy - LMD Tom Pickering (Tom) - TOEP/Conventions and Visitors Bureau Kate Rusch (Kate) - TOEP Public Information Officer Ann Taylor (Ann) Bo Winslow (Bo) - TOEP Fairgrounds and Events Manager Scott Zurn (Scott) - TOEP Public Works Barb Boyer Buck (Barb) - TOEP Public Works DESIGN TEAM jamie Licko ([amie) - Progressive Urban Management Associates (PUMA) Paul Kuhn (Paul) - Winston Associates (WA) GENERAL I Paul and Jamie made a brief presentation highlighting: o The work completed to date and upcoming milestones. o The design parameters and Master Plan Concepts A, B, and C. o A summary of the voting and comments from the first public forum, the Town staff and Labor Day input (with additional information contributed by Barb), and the on- line voting for the three concepts. â€¢ Paul noted that because the voting was so close and because different groups voted for different concepts as their favorite, the Town should have more latitude in selecting a preferred concept (or combination of concepts) for the recommended master plan. o The group asked questions regarding the concepts and potential phasing options. WINSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. 4696 Broadway, Boulder CO 80304 (P) 303.440.9200 (F) 303.449.6911 www.winstonassociates.com (Direct) 303.440.9240 pmkuhn@winstonassociates,com Meeting Summary - Stakeholder Review of Concepts Meeting Date: September 16, 2009 Page 2 of 4 â€¢ jamie outlined some of the key policy issues that will need to be defined in the final master plan. o She asked if the Stakeholder group wanted to consider the idea of reducing the size and frequency of the events being held in the park as was suggested by some individuals during the public input phase. o Jerry said that he recalls that the Stakeholder group discussed this issue in a past meeting and agreed the park needed to accommodate the events currently being held in the park, at their current levels of use. â€¢ He highlighted the results o f a fall 2008.survey o f the downtown community where 80% of those who responcled felt that the festivals were critical to Estes Park and the downtown. This made it clear that it was essential that Bond Park continued to host the current festival program. â€¢ He was comfortable with establishing the 100 tent limit for eveifts. He liked the approach illustrated in the concept plans for accommodating the vendor tents in the park area - as long as they were on a paved surface. â€¢ There appeared to be agreement on this issue as no one spoke in favor of reducing the scale or frequency o f the events being held in the park. o There was a concern expressed regarding the parking demand created by the vendors who participate in the large events. â€¢ Bo noted that 100 vendor tents can generate a demand for up to 200 parking spaces. The vendors currently park in the spaces surrounding the park or on MacGregor Avenue in the on-street-parking north of the park. â€¢ Ann noted that it was not desirable to have vendors use all the close-in parking as it took away parking opportunities for festival and downtown patrons. â€¢ The idea of requiring vendors to use remote parking at the fairgrounds was discussed and agreed to by the group as policy that should be a recommendation of the master plan. â€¢ A shuttle bus for vendors would need be provided so vendors could travel back and forth between Bond Park and the remote parking at the fairgrounds. OTHER COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS â€¢ Jerry sees phasing the upgrades for the park as a necessity that will need to be accounted for in the final plan. â€¢ Hopes to define improvements that could be constructed in the first phase of construction that would make a noticeable improvement in the park (not just focus on below-ground infrastructure improvements). â€¢ Each phase of construction will need to include tangible improvements the community can see and utilize. â€¢ Bo was in favor of the tent configuration shown in Concept A. He liked the "Events Promenade" and felt it would move people through the vendor tents in the most efficient manner and bring festival goers closer to the businesses north of the park. 2 Meeting Summary - Stakeholder Review of Concepts Meeting Date: September 16,2009 Page 3 of 4 â€¢ Some support was expressed for Concept C, as that option kept the majority of the people out of the open areas of the park during large events. ' Jerry suggested the group develop a hybrid plan that incorporated the best ideas of Concepts A, B, and C. i Scott also liked the tent configuration in Concept A and suggested that the tents along Park Lane be the location for the food tents. This could mean that the infrastructure system for the park (especially the electrical) be enhanced in these locations to accommodate the power needs of the food vendors. = As Ann needed to leave early, she had a number of comments: . Strongly supported the idea of making MacGregor Avenue a north-bound, one-way street as illustrated in Concept A. â€¢ This had the added benefit of eliminating the problem of people trying to make a left turn on to Elkhorn Avenue, which is nearly impossible throughout the summer. â€¢ Liked the tent configuration shown in Concept A as long as it worked for the vendors and enhanced the Town's ability to set up for each event. â€¢ There are already six major water features in town and the Town didn't need another water feature in Bond Park, especially given the capital and on-going maintenance costs. â€¢ Was in favor of continuing to create opportunities for winter uses and supported ice skating. â€¢ Ron also supported ice skating but felt is was critical that any ice skating facility be located on a paved surface to avoid damaging the park's turf. e Also suggested the Town move slowly toward including ice skating in the park by using a concessionaire for the first few years. â€¢ This would result in a phased approach, hopefully allowing the Town to test the idea o f ice skating without the initial capital cost. The Town could then purchase an ice skating system in the future if it proved to be successful. â€¢ Bob advocated including a water feature in the plan. e Would work best if located in the northwest corner o f the park so it could be visible from Elkhorn Avenue. This would help activate the park. â€¢ The Town might want to see if there was a way to keep the water feature running all year to create more winter activity. 1 There was a question regarding the safety of the fire pit. e Paul noted that the current thinking is to use a gas fire pit that is 18" to 24" above the sidewalk and surrounded by a seat wall that would create a safety setback. 1 Jerry liked the stage/shelter shown in Concept C. A shelter at the southwest corner of the park would serve as a park gateway and provide protection during afternoon rain showers. He also liked the dual use a shelter/stage provided. o Bob agreed with Jerry on these points. 3 Meeting Summary - Stakeholder Review of Concepts Meeting Date: September 16, 2009 Page 4 of 4 â€¢ A discussion followed regarding locating the stage in the southwest corner of the site. Some were in support of the shelter/stage idea while others expressed concerns regarding traffic noise, and the unsightly appearance of the music equipment associated with the stage being in such a visible location. ' Jamie felt very strongly that the southeast corner was not a good location for a stage due to the fact that it cut off access to the park and because of traffic noise from Elkhorn Avenue. â€¢ There was a suggestion to include opportunities for sculptures in park that small children could climb, perhaps near the water feature. â€¢ There was general agreement that a hybrid plan should be developed and it should include: â€¢ The events plaza shown in the northeast corner of the park in Concept B. â€¢ Make the plaza large enough to accommodate the larger ice rink shown in Concept C. 9 Natural ice rather than synthetic ice. â€¢ The fire pit location shown in Concept B and adapt it to the larger plaza and ice rink location. â€¢ Add a shade structure over the fire pit area. â€¢ Making MacGregor Avenue a one-way, north-bound street. â€¢ A water feature in the northwest corner of the park. â€¢ A simple stage in the northwest corner of the site. â€¢ Bo felt strongly that the stage needed to be covered. He felt a temporary tent-like structure that was erected at the beginning of the summer event season and taken down in the fall would be adequate. â€¢ The gateway shelter shown in Concept C but without the stage function. â€¢ The diagonal sidewalk shown in Concept B. The group felt this would be needed eventually to accommodate pedestrian flow. â€¢ Look for ways to soften this walk (tint the concrete, make it narrower, soften the edges, surround it by shrub beds, etc.) Tbe meeting summarl provided above is tbe memo author's understanding or interpretation of tbe subjects covered during tbe meetinh Minutes are to be distributed to all parties in attendance. Notify Town sta# or Winston Associates of anl discrepancies and/ or omissions in a time~, manner (+ 1 - five working da,s) for correction and re-distribution. r 4 1 1- 1 9 U C AGENDA FOR FIRST PUBLIC MEETING ./ g Bond Park Master Plan Town of Estes Park Wednesday, September 21 2009 Welcome & Introductions. (Town Staff) > Project History 1 Impetus for the Bond Park Master Plan 1 Goals and Objectives for the Master Plan Master Plan Status, Tasks Completed, and Existing Conditions (Winston Associates) 1 Schedule > Tasks Completed to Date 1 Goals for This Meeting 1 Review of Existing Site and Its Uses Summary of Public Outreach (Progressive Urban Management) 1 About the Public Outreach Process - Forums and Community Survey 1 What We Learned - Summary of the Initial Concepts Report Presentation of the Three Bond Park Concept Plans (Winston Associates) > Design Parameters 1 Presentation of the Concepts Open Forum: Questions / Comments Open House to Review Presentation Boards Participants can view the Bond Park Concept Plans and supporting materials up close, add comments, and vote (by dots) for their favorite Concept Plan igu WINSTON W MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATES TO: Master Plan Team . I FROM: Paul Kuhn, Winston Associates PROJECT: Estes Park/Bond Park Master Plan SUBJECT: Public Forum #1 Summary MEMO DATE: September 4,2009 MEETING DATE: September 2,2009 ATTENDING: Town of Estes Park Estes Park Citizens (C) Town Officials Town Staff Barb Boyer Buck (B) - Engineering Office Manager Scott Zurn (S) - TOEP Public Works Kate Rusch - TOEP Public Information Officer Design Team jamie Licko (1) - Progressive Urban Management Associates (PUMA) Paul Kuhn (]?) - Winston Associates (WA) Angie Hulsebus - Winston Associates (WA) COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOLLOWING THE FORMAL PRESENTATION Concept A Questions â€¢ Would you put trees in right away so they have more time to grow? â€¢ Eliminate parking spots on Elkhorn Avenue so you can see in to the park Concept B Questions â€¢ C = Why are we looking at building another performance area when we've already spent large sums of money at Riverside? Not sure if we should be spending money on a stage in Bond Park. Can't remember last time Riverside Plaza was even used. Why do we need to make this park all things for all people? o J = Historically this has been a place for this kind of use. C = Sound levels impact surrounding areas. His business located on NW corner adjacent to park. J = Public outreach; responding to majority of people's comments C = Don't like the loud noise of amplified music - feels it adversely impacts his business. Private citizens would get a ticket if they were that loud. WINSTON AssoCIATES, INC. 4696 Broadway, Boulder CO 80304 OP) 303.440.9200 (ID 303.449.6911 wwmwinstonassociates.com (Direct) 303.440.9240 pmkuhn@winstonassociates.com 00 0 Public Forum #1 Summary Meeting Date: September 2,2009 Page 2 of 3 Concept B Questions, cont. â€¢ C = Where does car show go in this concept? o P = On larger plazas in all concepts; keep o ff o f turf o C = Way more than 30 cars (parking on MacGregor) o J = One key question that needs to be answered is what do the events look like going forward? Changes could be made in type/scale o f events held. o S = Responding to community comments; changes may need to be made to accommodate future events or change the nature of events. o P = The Town will need to evaluate Bond Park's special event programming and adjust future events if there is consensus that changes are appropriate. By getting the heavy event activity off the turf as shown in the current concepts, the park's natural systems should be able withstand the current level of use. General Comments: â€¢ C = (Business owner on north side o f park - owns gallery) Thrilled that we're taking the time to look at all of this and welcoming input from the public. Primary concern: businesses on the north side of the park struggle because it's difficult to get people to notice there are shops over there. Having vendor tents facing Park Lane helps (e.g. Concept A). Current event tent setup blocks gallery. As the concepts are developed, some of the needs of Park Lane businesses should be kept in mind. Concept A with the event tents wrapping around the north side of the park seems like a good idea. Very tall trees may block businesses. Winter use great. o S = Water feature could also help draw attention to that side. 1 C = Riverwalk and riverfront already provide abundance of water. Lots of trees and picnic areas would be good. Idea of closing MacGregor is great. No need for water feature. No need for entry structure (block mountain views). Should stay a relaxing place. People lounge in park while other members of their families shop. Throwing down a blanket is nice. Simple. Low key. We have performance park already. o S = How do you feel about rock outcropping stage for small three piece band or a naturalized stage? o C = Good. Simple is better. Getting tents off grass is good. More vegetation could help sound. â€¢ C = Ice skating is good. Winter use is favorable. Estes Park has a decorative Main Street - we should compliment that. A real pretty ice skating ice feature would be good. Could even go beyond and have rental skates. There has been a need for this for years. Estes Park has tried to do this with old ice skating areas but people didn't know about them. This would be a good place for that and would provide economic value to the downtown. o S = Business owners? How many think it would help their business? o C = (Many nods) Yes, it would help. Will need to do something to mitigate the winter winds. â€¢ C = No one has addressed the parking issue around Bond Park or Town-wide. Concerned with reducing parking on Park Lane with temporary closures (OK with MacGregor). Event vendors taking up parking spaces a problem. Doesn't care if it is a 130 car classic car festival or festival with tents, no one can get to his business during these events. He closes during 3 2 Public Forum #1 Summary Meeting Date: September 2,2009 Page 3 of 3 of the biggest weekends (Memorial Day, 4th of July, and Labor Day) of the year because there is no customer traffic. All of the events that occur in Bond Park affect parking on the 3 biggest weekends of the year. â€¢ C = Concerned about closing MacGregor. Assigned handicap parking spaces are there. Handicap people lose the opportunity to attend events except when there is a shuttle. â€¢ C = Like the conceptual tent layouts. Would tents have sides on them? o P = Yes. â€¢ C = As a property owner (Old Prospect Inn), trees concern them. Looking at a significant remolding of their building to make it look nicer. Tree situation impacts their investment. Should they spend the money if Park Lane businesses are going to be blocked with trees? Would like to see Park Lane as more of a shopping destination. , o P= Tough to satisfy the community's desire for a park-like / green setting (per on- line survey results) and still provide views to buildings north of park. Could plant trees in groups and try to open up views to Park Lane buildings. o j = Maybe we can draw people nearer to the buildings through design. -- C = (gallery owner) Yds, agreed. Re-orient paths, add water feature; change orientation of tents. o C = I f people don't see the business, people don't go to it. â€¢ T = Likes Concept C. Take Concept C plus A tent wrap-around. Emphasize trees on the east and west side of street since that wouldn't affect views. â€¢ B = Question from woman who had to leave. Is power available for each tent? o P = Yes, this would be a goal. Reduce use of extension cords. â€¢ T = At another meeting was concerned about tents in park. But likes the resolution that has occurred. Nice job. .. 3 " Public Forum #1 Concept Preference and Comments Sheets Summaries Meeting Date: September 2,2009 Bond Park Master Plan Town of Estes Park September 8,2009 Preference Votes: 30 Votes Total Concept A = 14 Votes Concept B=4 Votes Concept C = 12 Votes Comments From Vote Form Comments From Vote Form Comments From Vote Form Without gateway and parking But with the shelter of"A" With wraparound sidewalk of on Elkhorn Ave .A" A - Modified B - with a small entrance I like the idea of keeping the Keep much grass - keep tents structure W/NW side more passive and off grass Less stone area spilling out on quiet Reduce paving - tent area on green area Activity focus on NE end: ice skating, SE end other (close to NE corner Less water area. Town Hall bathrooms) Use bus parking area (from But with walkway and ice Concept C) for additional tents. rink/fire pit of B and surrounding tents of A Seems simple with less Do not need building for expense, more room music I agree, however, that a Do not lose handicap parking performance structure seems spaces unnecessary Prefer A with streetscape and Adding tents from Concept A central walk of B on Park Lane Too much maintenance on the I would like to see a couple of water; also as somebody trees closer to Elkhorn on the mentioned, we already have turf, and the parking in the enough water attractions northern part o f the park to elsewhere be like the parking in Plan A, other than those, Plan C looks great. With Concept A tents on north side Plus tents along Park Lane 1 Water features good! Nice job! With Concept A tent confihuration Without stage and water Have small covered stage at waterfall Voted for Both B and C with comments: Like the water feature and ice rink in design C, but understand that cost is an issue. As a representative o f one of the Arts/Crafts festivals, I like the more central placement o f vendors in designs B and C. I would be concerned that vendors in the wrap hround design of A will in effect, be isolated -- those locations being less desirable. Thank you for accommodating the art festival use. - Kathy Littlejohn Fine Arts Guild Comments Sheets Summary â€¢ Excellent process, Excellent Results!! Very much like the Ice Rink and Fireplace combo. Need to incorporate public transportation/shuttle hub into this area. â€¢ B - How will the ice rink stay frozen? Will people really use it due to our wind? C - Will the water feature be like a splash park and will the water be clean? I like B the best - DO NOT think the ice rink is a good idea Karen Thompson (kthompson@estes.org) â€¢ More parking - close Park Lane on west side of park and double parking , I like the grass and openness - too much pavement in plans...maintenance and turf-type could improve grass survival Ice rink is too small. If you do it, make it much bigger â€¢ Keep as much green space as possible Spend the least amount of money (We are in.an economic ddwnturn) ! 2 â€¢ I like A or B, particularly the center walkway in B. I agree with the ability to close MacGregor Ave. I like the entrances in A and the raised stage in A. I don't like the low stage in B. I do like the skating park for wintertime in B. Eric Adams (eric@croshfitestespark.com) 970-227-0499. I am with Coolest Car Show and Heritage Festival. â€¢ Thanks for including space for tents/shows. I think the ice skating rink is extremely impractical based on size and potential use. Just check what kind o f usage the large rink at Keystone doesn't get. â€¢ I like the idea of an ice rink for winter. Am opposed to any function requiring F tents, especially occupying parking spots. I would prefer to see a relaxing, "green" park Any consideration given to using high quality artificial turf? Though I would prefer natural, but would hold up on ice rink. Possible winter events - ice sculptures Eliminate the 6 parking spaces on Elkhorn for a better view of park or use as handicap. Possibility o f an evergreen used for a community holiday tree with lighting. Good Job! â€¢ I would like the Bond Park to be mostly trees, green lawn with MacGregor Ave or Park Lane used for tents for displays. Please, no waterfalls, ponds, or obstructing structures. Keep it simple. I can do without the ice skating, although I skate. Thank you. Johanna Darden (970)586-3319 â€¢ Bond Park is perfect for winter activity - ice skating - to help maintain interest in the downtown area (fees and economy) There is not an ice area/pond available to the public other than the pond (Dorsey Lake) at YMCA and sometimes the Rec District at school/Stanley Park areas. â€¢ Use natural materials, boulders, big planting. AVOID terrible sculpture that will be expensive and controversial - if sculpture, find artists who do natural (not figurative) forms. â€¢ Sound is an issue whether for shop owners or the musical audience - think about the ambient traffic sounds. Locate the stage in a "sheltered" condition. Forget water and ice - not enough bang for the buck. Version A seems best. â€¢ Concept C - without the water or shelter/stage. 3 Use stage in #B - in small stage location in C - Sue Pinkham â€¢ No water feature! $$$ No music on stoplight corner - traffic and sound. Fire ring/plaza - Park Lane and MacGregor corner. Tents on MacGregor and Park Lane. Berm landscape and seating along Elkhorn. Move largest events elsewhere if parking is preferred by businesses. â€¢ Like Versiod "A" - with winter skating. Make stage area "natural" with plantings Don't like "B" with the trail though park "C" offers morepaved spaces for carshows, etc. Is there a way to blend "A" and "C" without "C"'s water features? â€¢ Winter wind feature - whimsical center piece Tents around fire - winter Wind block - winter â€¢ Keep much grass Keep paving in park at a minimum Keep event tents on pavement (including bus areas from Concept C) â€¢ Likes / Dislikes: Like Don't Like Concept A Tents surrounding Entry "arch", circular elements (too 1. formal) no walkway across park Concept B Walk through the park; Water feature @ NE end (like C irregular shape to ice rink - fire better for that) pit a nice idea Concept C Water feature of some sort on Shape of"stage" roof (too prominent west side. Multi-use stage - and peaked) through walkway entry - picnic? shouldbe N-S 4 Bond Park Concepts Which Concept do you like the most? (After you are done voting, please scroll down and hit the "Done" button (down and to the left) to complete the survey.) Thanks for your input! Response | Response Percent Count - Concept A 1 1;-ct=:r -=:--~w~ 1~~ 34.4% 63 37.2% 68 - r-- - - -- -Â· 7 Concept C , 1Â¥wzÂ·,14 6...~4 28.4% , 52 1 I Please add comments or ideas 103 ~ answered question 183 1- - 11- I . 1 skipped question 2 Please add comments or ideas 1 Moaving the sidewalk and stage away from Elkhorn is excellent. Sep 5,2009 7:19 PM 2 Simple and open is better. Don't need an elaborate water feature with the river Sep 8, 2009 2:51 PM and Black Canyon Creek nearby. An ice rink would be fun in the winter, but I question the practicality of such a feature and the upkeep required to maintain it. 3 A doesn't make as good use of the lawn as B, but has a nice entry. Sep 8,2009 4:44 PM The shelter in C seems to block the entrance to the park, and I don't like the stage in this location. But it does have nice water features. B makes best use of the space with the meandering central sidewalk, and still has a water feature, and has a nice arrangement of trees. I choose B. 4 Don't want it to change too much, but like the covered stage so Cowboy Brad Sep 8, 2009 11:22 PM doesn't have to cancel a concert because of rain. 5 Love the idea of sculpture garden, fire pit, skating rink and keeping tents off turf. 1 Sep 9,2009 6:34 AM like the paving on MacGregor and the idea of blocking that area off for tents during special events. Also like the water feature on this design best. All of the designs are nice concepts. I vote for C 6 The shelter and water fall make this one special. Also the ice area would be Sep 9,2009 12:52 PM easily seen and very inviting from Elkhorn. The less grass, more paved area should lead to less maintennce. 7 Particularly think the water feature is critical to the overall success of the park. Sep 11, 2009 2:49 PM Wherever people congregate, it is around water. This will also help mitigate the harsh traffic noise of Elkhorn Avenue. 8 I like the seating along Elkhorn in Concept B. Sep 11, 2009 6:09 PM I think the water features of Concept C could be costly to maintain: The performance area is better in B. 9 Like the use of water around the performing pavillion. Also like the fact the grass Sep 11, 2009 6:41 PM isn't devided by a walkway. Thanks for allowing the grass to be used by the public during special events by keeping the tents on the paved portions surrounding the park 1 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 10 Don't Like the Oriental style gate at the corner of Park Lane and MacGregor in A, Sep 11, 2009 6:47 PM or the front-end appearance of C. Seeing Bond Park from Elkhorn should, as far as possible, make it recognizable as a beautiful park. I also like the front to back walkway in B--it is the shortcut across the park and will better serve the grass.- 11 I like A the best. It would be nice to borrow the water design and entry from C and Sep 11, 2009 8:01 PM put it into A. 12 I like the idea of a larger area that is unpaved in the center. Also, the covered Sep 11,2009 8:45 PM stage is necessary for all the events held there. Concept A would be my choice, but B is also a good design. 13 Mike Swendrowski here. Sep 12, 2009 2:06 AM Cindy and I have seen a lot of parks Oust got back from Glacier NP & everything in between) and I firmly believe that the "Water Feature" will really be World Class! Boeing Engineer, Mike. Concept C 14 how about fixing the street by the hospital too? And have the state fix Morraine Sep 12, 2009 2:13 AM Ave by the newpaper! 15 I like the set up for events and the inclusion of water in the landscaping in Sep 12, 2009 7:20 PM Concept C. 16 People will cut across the grassy area, so might as well include a sidewalk. Sep 12,2009 7:43 PM 17 Sidewalk down the middle is practical so that a path won't be wotn anyway. Sep 12, 2009 8:53 PM Small water feature(if any at all) is more practical and less costly to maintain. Arrangements for tents is very good and allows for good circulation. Picnic tables may lead to more maintenance concerns as well as trash concerns. Benches may be more practical. Closing and utilizing MacGregor on occasion is a very good idea. The ice rink idea is'doubtful as to maintenance, weather and use, as well as the expense to build and maintain it. Excellent idea to redo this iconic park. 18 I like the overall rustic nature of Plan B. Plan C seems too artificial, with all the Sep 12, 2009 9:05 PM paving so close to Elkhorn Ave., and the invented water feature. I like the rock outcropping around the stage on Plan A. But, Plan B has them both beat because it seems the most natural looking (stones around fire pit, lack of obvious rings in the paving like Plan A has), and I like the sidewalk meandering through the center. I definitely prefer the special paving in the rear of the park rather than along Elkhorn. 19 Although a fire pit is attractive when it is burning, when it is not burning it can be Sep 13, 2009 9:19 PM very ugly. I am sure an artist could design a cambination fountain/firepit that could function independently base on weather conditions or both at the:sam& time for maximum effect. Think about it. Merilyn Abel 20 I like the walkway through the center of the park. ; Sep 13,2009 9:31 PM 21 The things I liked about Plan B are the use of the paved area for the ice rink in the Sep 13, 2009 11:47 PM winter. I liked the sidewalk through the park, people will walk across so make it work for everyone. I like the wall along the Elkhorn side for people to sit. This is the best of the three plans, although I love the water in Plan C, however I think it would be a problem with people and animals in it and we have th@ river walk area with lots of water areas to enjoy. I am excited to see the changes. This plan seems to have good use with less upkeep and e*pense. Thank you. 22 I would like to see the statue of Enos Mills and his dog stay in Sep 13, 2009 11:56 PM the park. , 23 I like the layout of concept B the best but would like to see event tents configured Sep 14, 2009 3:01 AM as in concept A leaving the Bus Drop Off available for transport of event attendees. 2 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 24 Concept A is my overwhelming design choice for several reasons: Sep 15, 2009 5:41 PM 1. Traffic on MacGregor Avenue goes North and does not exit to Elkhorn. The current southbound traffic flow on MacGregor is always backed up, and people trying to turn East onto Elkhorn frequently pull in front of oncoming traffic creating serious safety problems. There is a traffic'light at the Elkhorn/Riverside intersection that is more than adequate to handle southbound traffic turning onto Elkhorn. 2. All of the tent configurations are on paved areas - not on the grass. Parking cars, and placing tents on the grass for special events ruins the grass and creates an unnecessary maintenance/replacement expense every year or two to repair the damage. The pedestrian and car traffic on the grass, and over the tree roots, also packs the soil so hard it eventually suffocates the tree roots and kills the trees. 3. The 10" sidewalk on the South side of Bond Park sweeps North into the park allowing room for trees next to the road. This feature breaks up the straight line sidewalk through town and provides some excellent separation between traffic areas and pedestrian area adjacent to the park. Beautiful! 4. Creating a covered stage area at the NW corner and the Fire Pit in the NE corner. This appears to be well thought out and should pull pedestrian congestion away from traffic congestion on Elkhorn and make it safer for people to enjoy the beauty of the park. 5. Uncluttered simplicity and beauty of the overall design and potential ease of maintenance. Overall coast of maintaining Bond Park should be a major consideration in the design selection. This design has all of the attributes of a very elegant gathering place but appears to have taken into consideration the ongoing cost of maintaining the beautiful setting. Problems with Concepts "B" and "C" 1. Traffic flow on MacGregor comes out onto Elkhorn - This just creates an additional unregulated traffic intersection that is not necessary. Good traffic flow is already available at Elkhorn and Riverside. 2. The Water Features in Design "C" will be a maintenance nightmare. Trying to keep the water areas clean and operating will require an excessive maintenance budget. There is also the cost of winterizing it from freezing and thawing. In addition, I don't believe the water features are necessary given we have great natural water features from Fall River and Big Thompson rivers less than one block away. Bond Park does not have to compete with the design beauty of Riverside Plaza. Let Bond Park have a unique beauty of it's own. How about some flower beds and sculptures like the bronze we already have? 3. Entrances in the SE corners are out of character. Stone columns in Design "B" are too modernistic for a "mountain setting" The covered entry Shelter/Stage in Design "C" is too overwhelming for the size of the park. This also will create major traffic congestion and safety hazards as drivers gawk at activities in the stage area while trying to navigate this very busy intersection. We need fewer distractions here - not more! 4. Too much special event tenting close to Elkhorn These two designs bring a lot of the pedestrian traffic too close to Elkhorn and increase the potential for accidents between vehicles and pedestrians. Design "A" is the only one that moved that congestion to the North and East sides of the park. 25 would like to have evergreen type trees scatered around for green in the winter Sep 15,2009 10:05 PM and for christmas decorating. the sidewalk down the middle will save the turf somewhat. The water feature looks a little small. 26 This is very lovely, but how much will it cost? Sep 16, 2009 7:53 PM 27 Retain Enos Mills sculpture with proper orientation; keep food vendors visible to Sep 16, 2009 7:54 PM the passing pedestrian traffic; keep as much turf as possible; another sclupt of FO Stanley would be very appropriate; in regard to the ice rink: use the funds for this part of the project and invest it in a larger, more sheltered ice rink at Stanley Park. 3 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 28 The thing I like the most is that the parking on McGregor Ave is in a one-way Sep 16, 2009 9:59 PM direction. I hate walking across Macgregor along Elkhorn - I can't tell you how many times cars have come close to hitting me here in their race to pull out onto , Elkhorn. It's hard for the cars (especially turning east) so I understand why they pull out so fast. This plan seems to give a lot of space for festivals and special event set-up. I also like keeping the center of the park as green as possible. Having said that, all plans are great. What a great job. I can't wait for the changes to occur. Joan E. McKinney 155 Stanley Circle Dr. 29 Plan A is nice, but Plan B - diagonal sidewalk will lesson wear on turf, as many Sep 16, 2009 10:05 PM people cross the park when its not in use.. Dont need water feature as in Plan C - Have Riverside Plazza/Riverwalk for water features. Any thought to using artifical turf to lesson wear & tear, sod replacement costs and mud caused by watering? It would provide a year round durable surface with little maintenance costs. 30 I'd like to see the street and parkinb in front of the town building disappear. Sep 16, 2009 11:04 PM Incorporate it into the park - resulting in a town center feel. It can be tough getting on Elkhorn from that intersection. Redirect all traffic to the light on Park Lane. At the very minimum close MacGregor completely during the summer. It's a useless little section of street. 31 B just seems to have more and better planned. Sep 17,2009 1:01 AM 32 I like the water in Cocept C, also we do not need a big performance area since we Sep 17, 2009 1:32 AM have PERFORMANCE PARK : 33 move the sidewalk off Elkhorn as in A, lose the sidewalk thru th emiddle of the Sep 17, 2009 3:57 AM park 34 The water feature compliments the riverwalk very well. Sep 17, 2009 4:41 AM 35 Just add a nice park with no events. Put the events at the fair grounds. Don't Sep 17, 2009 12:29 PM clutter up down town estes park. You have not made an alternative available for no events and use the fair grounds for events. If you don't make that available perhaps someone will sue you to stop the project. 36 Where is Enos Mills? Sep 17, 2009 2:17 PM 37 I like that trees surround all sides of the park with Concept A. I also like that for Sep 17, 2009 7:59 PM events, all the tents will be confined to the street and around the park, rather than also in the pull-off area between Elkhorn and the municipal building. While the water/pond idea for Concept C is nice, we already have a riverwalk throughout town. Also, Performance Park is another event area with water around it. The layout for Concept B is also nice, though I'm not a big fan of the sidewalk splitting the grass down the center. Thanks for your work on this! I'm eager to see the end result. 38 The key is too keep the festivals off the grass. I couldn't believe the damage done Sep 17, 2009 9:52 PM A too the new sod this year and the cost of the sod. Why bother with grass at all if you're going to have events that ruin it. I wish you bould rethink having the events in Bond Park. 39 I like the water feature. Â· Sep 18,2009 3:57 PM 40 Our weather and temperatures make the upkeep of an outdoor ice rink Sep 18,2009 4:17 PM challenging and expensive. 41 Great Design because: Sep 19, 2009 1:34 AM 1. There is no access from McGregor Avenue to Elkhorn 2. The tent areas ane on pavement and Aot on the grass 3. There are a lot of trees in the park. 4. No water features - these are a maintenance nightmare and not needed 4 of 9 . Please add comments or ideas 42 Add water features to A, and all is well. The other concepts have too much Sep 19, 2009 4:02 AM coverage of the grassy area that makes Bond Park a "park." 43 I Ilike A because'it pupts the craft fair tents on the streets. (No need to re-sod the Sep 19,2009 5:28 PM park after muddy events!) It is very important to have a PERFORMANCE AREA, especially for COWBOY BRAD!!!!! I also like the water areas in Plan C 44 FANTASTIC PLAN! It has so many wonderful features that locals and visitors of Sep 19,2009 7:26 PM all ages alike can appreciate. 45 Why are we screwing up Bond Park? Why can't it just be a small green area in Sep 19,2009 10:42 PM the midst of town? If someone with half a brain had not cut all the tree roots when putting in the sprinkler system, we would still have some great old trees...can't you just leave stuff alone? 46 Close Park Lane add to total paved area. Sep 19,2009 11:30 PM 47 An addition of some kind of shelter / entry shelter for protection from the Sep 20,2009 1:03 PM everpresent thunder storms would be a nice addition. 48 I like the idea of a sidewalk that cuts through the park. I also think the Sep 21, 2009 2:02 AM configuration would fit the best with your special events. I like the seat wall on the south side of the park, that would allow visitors to sit and watch people. 49 from an art vendor perspective-- I like the layout of A best. Having the booths Sep 21, 2009 3:44 AM along/ nearer to Elkhorn Ave, as they are in B and C is less desirable. There is more noise and car fumes to consider. Perhaps things are also more visible, but not by much. Also "quad" booth configurations (in B& C there are only quads) are less secure in a windy place than setting up booths in longer rows. We have had quads in Bond Park all along, but if we use this as an opportunity to line booths up in longer rows, it will make for a more secure set up when the weather comes in.... The water features in B and C also, while nice and I am sure pretty, concern me from the very nature of our ecosystem. We do not have abundant water in Colorado so I would prefer that we not include a water feature. 50 As artists who have been involved in many art shows, what seems to work best Sep 21,2009 1:28 PM for us for consumer traffic flow, storage of art, unloading and packing up, etc. are booths (10' wide by 12' deep [for storage])placed together on both sides of a street with aisles intermittently spaced between booths. Typically those corner booths next to the aisle would be charged a higher booth fee. 51 I like the green buffer between the Park & Town building. I like the stage set off of Sep 21, 2009 4:53 PM Elkhorn - don't want a "back-stage" facing elkhorn. Can ice skating investment be justified? 52 Overall, I like B with the following modifications: Sep 21,2009 4:55 PM -use the timber gateway from A -1 like the vendor tent layout on Plan B -Stage off elkhorn is good -Path winding through park is good -Ice skating can be done at rollerblade rink 53 This one seems to capture so many natural Estes Park features and includes an Sep 22, 2009 1:41 PM Aesthetic aspect with the sculpture garden. The water design is very nice, too. I'm assuming there will be some picnic tables. It looks very inviting. If not Plan C then I would vote next for Plan A. 54 I vote for A with a larger plaza around the fire pit to accommodate an oval ice rink Sep 22,2009 8:56 PM in winter. I believe adding the sidewalk through the middle of the park, as in B, will help protect the grass. 5 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 55 Prefer Concept B for some of these reasons: Want trees against Elkhorn Ave to Sep 22, 2009 9:18 PM break the traffic visibility. Need sidewalk on Elkhorn for major foot traffic and access to parked cars. Want sidewalk on diagonal thru park to protect grass. Want maximum green space (grass), and minimized hard surface paving. Minimize vendor tent access to green space to protect grass. Minimize expenditures. Want ice skating rink, but no vendor rentals of skating equipment. Don't nfed water feature, which subtracts from green space and presents maintenance problems. 56 I like the diagonal sidewalk across the park - think it will be used by people Sep 22, 2009 9:51 PM parking on upper MacGregor and the town lot. Less wear and tear on the grass. I like the covered stage with the rocks beside it from Concept A, and think the water feature iri B is much better than the big one in C (less maintenance and liability). I would hope the gateway with stone columns in B would include some plaques with the history of the Bond Park location. 57 I like the paved area on the southwest corner. This allows events such as Sep 22, 2009 10:46 PM Rodeo,Elk Fest, etc to set up a "gazebo" to sell tickets from. 58 I like the firepit, gateway with stone columns and the space for events. ' , Sep 22,2009 11:46 PM 59 any plan that includes restricting parking on MacGregor Ave during special events Sep 23, 2009 12:11 AM is rediculous! We have very limited parking downtown already. We need to make the park as user friendly as possible. The only other alternative would be moving all events to the fair grounds, which I don't think downtown businesses would appreciate. 60 I've already voted for plan C without the water but I want to add that there should Sep 23, 2009 1:02 AM be a water fountain for dogs at the bottom and back of at least one water fountain in the park. There are many dogs on leashes being walked around town that would appreciate a good drink of water, not from someone's leftover soda cup or a little slurp from someone's hands. I know several parks have differetit types of water fountaind for pets, so I'm sure one could be found that wouldn't be'too expensive and would serve the purpose. many hanks for all our hard work!!! Sue Pinkham 61 I like the simplicity of this concept. Water features or bigger pavilion could always Sep 23,2009 2:38 PM be added later. This keeps the green area in the center of town for animals, and doesn't fill it up with a lot of human made objects. 62 A water feature is a waste of money!!! Sep 23,2009 3:29 PM 63 I think this is the best balance of greenery and paths, water and fire - lots of nice Sep 23, 2009 5:21 PM details that would benefit our community as well as visitors! Will the statue of Enos Mills stay where it is or be moved elsewhere in the park? Please remember he was the one responsible for Rocky Mountain National Park in the first place and the statue should remain as a tribute to him. Thank yo all for all of your hard work in generating these plans and allowing the community to have input in this way!!! 64 I like "A" for the amphitheatre-like portion in the corner, but "B" is nice for the Sep 23,2009 6:05 PM sidewalk cutting through the middle to help save ware and tare on the grass, and the ice skating/tent area is a great idea as well. 65 Would omit water feature in B as small and just an added cost. Nice that the stage Sep 23,2009 8:46 PM and firepit are away from Elkhorn. Safer and easier to hear the performers. In concept C if there was a performance it would be disrupted by people trying to enter from Elkhorn. In concept B like that MacGregor is still 2 way. Would limit entrance onto Elkhorn to only a right hand turn. 6 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 66 While I really like the 'Concept C' design, it does not provide for continuity of Sep 23,200911:49 PM events that 'Concept A' does. Concept C includes continuity of design with the river walk area that I think is very important but stringing the event area to the east in the bus drop-off zone really takes away from the specific events. I really believe the 'Concept C' design with the modification of the 'Concept A' event plan would be the best of both worlds. 67 my interest is because I participate in spedial events in Estes, but I do believe that Sep 24,2009 2:04 PM any of these plans would work! My next choice would be plan C. 68 Alittle more size on the water feature on the Elkhorn side of the sidewalk, please. Sep 24,2009 2:56 PM 69 I think the water feature will add so much to the appearance of the park. Plenty of Sep 24,2009 6:46 PM exhibit space around the grassy areas should solve the problem of constant turf replacement. 70 It was a toss up between B and C but ultimately I think C has won for me. Sep 25,2009 2:22 PM 71 In general I like concept A, BUT: Sep 25, 2009 5:16 PM *- do not like the one way traffic of MacGregor Ave. in that area - keep it two-way; *- do NOT remove parking on north side of Park Lane! We don't have enough as is, and a designer wants to remove some?; *- Use the larger stage of Concept B in the "A" package; *- use more conifer tree than shown in the drawings - young spruce and fir will add more wintergreen downtown 72 Like the idea of a sidewalk going through the park Sep 26, 2009 12:00 AM and shelter towards the back where there might be less traffic noise. Fire pit towards the back so when COWBOY BRAD sings we will be able to hear him also the picnic tables towards the back away frbm the traffic 73 While they all have their merits, I particularly like the water features of Concept C Sep 26, 2009 1:42 AM as well as the sculpture garden. I also like the paving in the parking of concept A for special events. I think the conversion of MacGregor Ave to be parking/special event area in all concepts to be a sound idea. 74 I particularyly like the water feature. How will the fire pit be controlled? Sep 26,2009 2:08 AM 75 I love the waterfall concept, sculpture garden and picnic grove. Lots of colorful Sep 26, 2009 4:41 PM perennials and annuals would be greatly appreciated. Thank you Rebecca Snyder 76 I chose Concept A because 1 it does not have the higher maintenance water Sep 27,2009 2:13 PM features and it has what I feel is the best event design lay out. I would, however move the ice rink off the grass area and on to the paving behind the fire pit. 77 Having water featrues near performance stages or fire pits will potentially drown Sep 27,2009 4:05 PM out sound from musicians/speakers and can be dangerous if electrical amplification devices are nearby. Water features should be further away from performance areas. 78 I think it's a good idea to put trees between the park ahd Elkhorn, to reduce street Sep 27, 2009 6:18 PM noise and provide more of a "haven" from the insane traffic we get in the summer. I like B overall more, but adding more trees in this area - like in Concept A - would make it better. It would be nice if there could be a little more water features also, like in C, but not vital. I liked C the least because of lack of trees along Elkhorn, and the fact that more green space is lost to paved surfaces. There is also less seating around the fire pit in Concept C, and I can see this being a problem given the opportunities this meeting place can provide (sing alongs, talks, other entertainment). I am very happy the town is looking for our input, thank you for this opportunity! 79 A tiny little area for ice skating is a joke. Disappointing that a designer would think Sep 27,2009 6:59 PM this is a real option. 7 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 80 The ice rink needs t6 be alot bigger!! The town of Estes'Park has for years tried to Sep 28, 2009 12:17 AM get more business downtown in the winter. What a way to get people downtown. The planned rinks would be way to small for many people, let alone hockey games, ice plays, ect . The summer looks are great, but we need the business more in the winter, not the hummer!!!!! 81 The path bisecting the park appears appealing...allowing foot traffic through all Sep 28,2009 3:35 PM seasons (assuming it would be cleared in snowy times) with less impact on grass/soil; and the location of the skating rink would be less of a distraction for vehicle traffic and the skaters as well. 82 Diagonal Parking should be available on all sides of the park, for more to enjoy. Sep 28,2009 6:40 PM Also, Parking permits should begiven out to employees of local businesses, so thet they dont have to go move their cars every three hours during their work shifts. 83 add more buffer towards the busy street ~ Sep 28,2009 6:45 PM 84 As much bpen undeveloped green space as possible with healthy trees'. Sep 28, 2009 8:41 PM Good idea to put the concert and fire pit areas back away from traffic noise on Elkhorn. Keep design simple. Keeping the event tents off the grass and on the closed street worked well for the Scandinavian Festival. Concepts B and C have too muth development, clutter and structure. 85 As an artist,'participating in the arts and crafts show each year, I like the Sep 28,2009 10:11 PM openness of A. We would hate to loose access to the park for the art festival!! 86 I like this one best, except for the design of the ice skating rink: It would be better Sep 29, 2009 10:47 PM for skating if it were more ovalshape. Move the firepit furthet south and eliminate the water and large ring of boulders. 87 We were wondering whether the park could have a flat area of fountains that pop Sep 29, 2009 11:52 PM up that children could-play in in the summer. We had suggested that before and wondered if there was some problem with that idea. A public health issue maybe? We assume that the water feature in concept C would not allow for people to get into the water. We really like the Entry Shelter/Stage in concept C. The water feature adjacent to it is very lovely too. We love the idea of the ice rink in the winter. Thanks for all thework on this park. What ever you do it will be such an asset to downtown. Gus and Diane Lee, 508 Big Horn Drive. 88 Most simple rendition. Adds trees on all sides of the park. Maximizes use of Sep 30, 2009 3:16 AM parking areas for tents, and correspondingly minimizes vehicle traffic and parking on the park area. Maximizes the green area and minimizes the paved areas. For improvement, recommend slightly reducing the size of the paved area at the north end. Also, consider dropping the fire pit and substituting a water feature. The fire pit seems hokey, while a water feature of some sort seems more fitting for the park. 89 I like the additional water features of this plan and the ice rink area for winter. As Sep 30,2009 2:35 PM an art fair exhibitor, I prefer the quad layout versus in-line tents as I do glass art and benefit from the end exposure. Concept C seems to have something for ' everyone in a more artistic ahd pleasing layout. 90 What I like best about this plan: Sep 30,2009 7:15 PM Sidewalk diagonal through park--people will cut through anyway and trample the grass in the others. Winter ice rink more attractive free form and near fire pit which could be used as a warming area by skaters. More space around vendor tents and off of the grass--easier to move through and see displays--you know how crowded it is now. Wider distribution of trees--more attractive and more areas of shade. Only C mentions "Sculpture Garden/Picnic Grove". I hope you are planning to keep Enos Mills in the park! 8 of 9 Please add comments or ideas 91 Drinking water fountains? Sep 30,2009 7:49 PM Mills/Scotch statue? EP Information kiosk? 92 Highly support idea of hosting ice scultping events in winter. Only other areas I Sep 30,2009 10:39 PM know of doing this is Breckenridge. Would bring new winter visitors. Thank you, Rhonda Bachelor 93 I really like the idea of hosting ice sculpting events in the winter. Sep 30,2009 10:44 PM Mike Bachelor 94 Concept C seems to include more features, including the water features, ice rink, Sep 30,2009 11:55 PM 2 stages. picnic area, sculpture garden, etc. It seems like the best looking plan. 95 I had a difficult time choosing between "A" and "C". I initially like "B" best but then Oct 1, 2009 3:22 AM decided the walkway cut through too much. I really like the ponds in "C". 96 Prefer this layout but think some type of water feature should be included. Octl,200910:59AM 97 This concept seems to give you the most open space in the center. You certainly Oct 4,2009 8:30 PM don't need water features taking up usable space. 98 I think it has everything combined and it would very beautiful both in all seasons. Oct 5, 2009 12:11 AM judy 99 The contemporary sculpture art really dosen't work with the mountain ambiance of Oct 6, 2009 11:17 PM Estes Park. 100 Needs to be economical to maintain & pratical for all. Oct 7, 2009 11:45 PM 101 Except close Park Lane and add to Use during special events! Oct 8, 2009 12:30 AM 102 None: All of these assume that we will continue to "flood" downtown streets with Oct 8,2009 4:05 PM visitors, cars and "events" during the summer ( and now winter ? ) weekends. Long time merchants with whom I have discussed these activities say they clutter the sidewalks with gawkers, but do little to increase sales revenues. Our goals should be to get people out of their cars early at the fairgrounds or visitor center parking lots and into the now little-used shuttles; then extend the pleasant early evening shopping times through all stores open until 10 PM special hours and on- street family fun activities. Putting everything in what should be a cool, peaceful "oasis" simply clutters our main thoroughfare and adds unnecessary damage to this lovely park. Keep it simple...no stage, no postage stamp ice rink, no fire pits, no outdoor amplifiers...a lovely drinking fountain ( including the one we used to have for doggies ), maybe a shaved ice cart or similar, more trees and lots of picnic and seating benches. Let's keep it a park! Put special events at the visitor center and Stanley Park where they belong and THERE IS PLENTY OF PARKING that can be charged for and which will generate revenue. hh 586- 2103 103 Concept A is definitely the best option - very well done! Oct 10, 2009 5:33 AM 9 Of 9 4 , WINSTON W MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATES TO: Meeting Attendees FROM: Paul Kuhn, Winston Associates PROJECT: Bond Park.Master Plan, Town of Estes Park SUBJECT: Review of Preferred Plan with Stakeholders MEMO DATE: October 13, 2069 4 MEETING DATE: October 1, 2009 ATTENDING: STAKEHOLDERS jerry Miller (erry) - TOEP/Trustee Eric Blackhurst (Eric) - TOEP/Trustee Ron Norris (Ron) - Estes Valley Planning Commission Ann Taylor (Ann) - Downtown Business 1 Bob Joseph (Bob) - TOEP/Community Development Bo Winslow (Bo) - TOEP Fairgrounds and Events Manager Scott Zurn-(Scott) - TOEP Public Works Dave Mahany (Dave) - TOEP Public Works Superintendent Barb Boyer Buck (Barb) - TOEP Public Works DESIGN TEAM Paul Kuhn (Paul) - Winston Associates (WA) GENERAL â€¢ Paul made a brief presentation highlighting: o The work completed-to-date and upcoming milestones. o The final results from the preference voting for the concepts (Concept A: 177, Concept B: 207, and Concept C: 204). Votes were tabulated from Public Forum #1, a Labor Day weekend review, Town staff review, and the review of concepts on-line. 0- The design paranieters for Concept A, B, and C were reviewed along with an overview of each concept. The points of consensus from the 9/16/09 Stakeholder review of the three concepts. The Preferred Concept plan including the typical and event conditions. â€¢ There was a brief discussion of off-site parking for vendors during major events. o A question was asked regarding how the parking worked during the Fine Art's Guild Art Show. â€¢ Bo thought it worked fine. Vendors were asked to park their larger vehicles at the Fairgrounds. Some personal vehicles parked in the area, but not WINSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. 4696 Broadway, Boulder CO 80304 (P) 303.440.9200 (F) 303.449.6911 www.winstonassociates.com (Direct) 303.440.9240 pmkuhn@winstonassociates.com 00 Meeting Summary - Stakeholder Review of the Preferred Plan Meeting Date: October 1,2009 Page 2 of 3 immediately around Bond Park. Bo thought this worked for 95% of the vendors. â€¢ Bo noted the Autumn Gold event went well, but some tents did blow down. o There was a discussion as to how well the car shows would adapt to the event configuration in the Preferred Plan. â€¢ Bo had not spoken with that car show groups yet, but he thought the areas shown'for the tents iii the Preferred Plan should work for the car shows. ~ Could also use the parallel parking spaces on Elkhorn. o There was a question as to how the events with controlled access (a paid admission event or an event with alcohol) could be adapted to the Preferred Plan. 1 Bo will work with the Design Team to develop a plan for that type of event. Currently there are 1" diameter sleeves in the turf for temporary fence posts and fencing. All agreed it would be preferable to find a more attractive system than the plastic safety fencing. â€¢ It will probably be necessary to develop a system that encloses the entire park. â€¢ There was general agreement that the Town need policies to limit the size of events held at Bond Park. â€¢ Eric noted that the Town already has a policy limiting the number of tents that can be erected in Bond Park. i If events want to go beyond the limit set by the Town, they'll need to find a different venue. â€¢ Eric questioned the necessity of the water feature with the river and other water features in the immediate area. His biggest concerns were the initial cost, on-going maintenance costs, and replacing worn-out equipment (pumps) in the future. â€¢ Mentioned that wildlife can also be a problem with water features. e Dave was also concerned; even regular cleaning of the water feature requires staff time. â€¢ Ron suggested the master plan include a pro/con analysis regarding a water feature. â€¢ Bob expressed a concern about maintaining design integrity with a phased project. It is critical that the park looks consistent when it is finished. â€¢ Need to establish very clear design guidelines. 0 Paul noted that this master plan will include design guidelines, but that some of the detailed design work and final selection of materials will need to wait until the construction document phase. The first phase of construction will set many o f the final design details and materials that would be followed in subsequent phases. â€¢ Eric felt that phasing was the only option for the park renovation as it would have to be funded with current Town funds or from grants. Passing a new tax in any form was probably not realistic. ' Ann noted that if the project was phased, the Town needed to be prepared to follow the master plan through to completion. â€¢ Dave suggested that concrete bollards would work better than steel. â€¢ Paul reviewed the preliminary Opinion o f Probable Cost for the Preferred Plan. 2 Meeting Summary - Stakeholder Review of the Preferred Plan Meeting Date: October 1, 2009 ' Page 3 of 3 â€¢ The construction cost was estimated at $1.58 million for all the improvements shown in the Preferred Plan (including a 10% estimating gontingency). Additional soft costs (a construction contingency fund, design fees, bidding costs, etc.) brought the total cost for the project to $1.8 million. â€¢ Ron was concerned that the 10% estimating contingency might be low, especially if there were additional costs each time a gontractor had to set up for a new phase of 5. lA construction. â€¢ Paul noted that there was an estimating contingency included in each individual unit price and that phasing construction could indeed increase the contractor's mobilization costs shown in the estimate. â€¢ Eric noted that there were still foundations from old structures buried below grade in Bond Park. These need to be planned for in the c6st estimate. He didn't want to overlook other utilities, such as any in MacGregor Avenue that might need to be upgraded. â€¢ Ron noted that it was critical that the public understand that this is a master plan and that phasing is a critical component of almost every master plan. â€¢ Paul mentioned the Design Team's concern regarding storm sewer piping. According to Van Horn Engineering, the nearest storm sewer pipe is 600' east of the park. â€¢ Paul noted that it was feasible to convey surface drainage from the park and the surrounding streets to the Elkhorn Avenue gutter. â€¢ Accommodating below grade piping for improvements as a sub-drained turf system could be impractical with no storm sewer in the area. â€¢ Bob mentioned that the Town had looked at installing storm sewers in the area Â·o f the park in the past, but the number and depths o f the existing utilities made this impractical. â€¢ There was agreement that a range of cost ($1.5 to $2.5 million) should be presented at the 10/8 public forum because the estimate was still preliminary and included a level-of-detail that would be difficult to present to the public. â€¢ There was further agreement to use Keypad Polling to get the public's input on which improvement/amenity they would most like to see constructed in the park. â€¢ Scott thought the major source of funding for the park reconstruction could be the Larimer County Open Space funding the town receives. â€¢ Olien Space funding, when combined with grants or other funding, could allow the park to be fevamped in approximately 5 years. â€¢ There was a concern that the downtown community may not want to see construction for five years in a row. â€¢ Town staff willlook at the estimate to try to identify improvements that could be constructed by Town staff during the late fall and winter months. â€¢ Paul will get Bo to-scale plots of the Preferred Plan to look at options for securing the site for fee-based or alcohol events. Tbe meeting summag provided above is tbe memo author's understanding or interpretation of tbe subjects covered during tbe meetin& Minutes are to be distributed to all Parties in attendance. Notijj Town staff or Winston Associates of any discrepanties and/ or omissions in a timely manner (+ 1 -five workintdaos) for correction and re-distribution. 3 WINSTON W MEMORANDUM ASSOCIATES TO: Master Plan Team FROM: Paul Kuhn, Winston Associates PROJECT: Estes Park/Bond Park Master Plan SUBJECT: Public Forum #2 Summary (Presentation of the Preferred Plan) MEMO DATE: October 16,2009 MEETING DATE: October 8,2009 ATTENDING: Town of Estes Park Estes Park Citizens - 14 (C) Town Officials Town Staff Scott Zurn (S) - TOEP Public Works Kate Rusch (K) - TOEP Public Information Officer Barb Boyer Buck - TOEP Engineering Office Manager Design Tearn Jamie Licko (D - Progressive Urban Management Associates (PUMA) Paul Kuhn (P) - Winston Associates (WA) PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Paul and Jamie made a brief presentation highlighting: 1 The reasons why a master plan is necessary. I The work completed-to-date and upcoming milestones. â€¢ The final results from the preference voting for the concepts (Concept A: 177, Concept B: 207, and Concept C: 204). Votes were tabulated from Public Forum #1, a Labor Day weekend review, Town staff review, and the review o f concepts on-line. ' The goals, design parameters, and programming/activation for Bond Park that evolved out of the public involvement process. " How the Preferred Plan was developed including points of consensus from the Stakeholder Group reviews. â€¢ The Preferred Concept plan including the typical and event conditions (including a review of the 3D model of the plan) along with cost projections for the improvements. This portion of the forum ended with a Keypad Polling exercise that focused on identifying the group's priorities for the amenities included in the Preferred Plan. WINSTON[ ASSOCIATES, INC. 4696 Broadway, Boulder CO 80304 (P) 303.440.9200 (F) 303.449,6911 www.winstonassociates.com (Direct) 303.440.9240 pmkuhn@winstonassociates.com Public Forum #2 Summary Meeting Date: October 8,2009 Page 2 of 3 COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOLLOWING FORMAL PRESENTATION * C: ' How will the stage shown in this concept and the types of performances to be programmed on the stage compare / coordinate with the performances programmed at the Performance Park? o P/j: The performances in Bond Park will typically be those associated with the special events that are held in the park. There are also Cowboy Sing Alongs held in Bond Park throughout the summer and these will be either on the stage or at the fire pit. > C. To what extent would closing McGregor Avenue and making it one-way funnel traffic on to Park Lane and "load up" the signal at the intersection of Park Lane and Elkhorn? o S: Traffic patterns should not be adversely affected by the change and the traffic signal/intersection at Elkhorn and Park Lane should not be overloaded. The safety benefit of eliminating the left turn from south-bound MacGregor makes the one- way attractive. > C: What is the seating capacity of fire pit area? 0 (P) Approximately 50 people but we will double check that figure. (P: The ring of seating boulders around the fire pit is large enough to hold between 45 and 55 people.) * C: Does the entry shelter block the views of Long's Peak? o S/P: The shelter shown in the 3D model is place-holder shelter, and primarily used , to give a sense of scale. Any gateway shelter included in the final plans for Bond Park will go through a formal design process which will include testing to be sure it does not adversely impact views to Long's Peak. 1 C: Will there be breaks in the seat wall along Elkhorn Avenue? o P: That's a good suggestion. It will probably be necessary to provide gaps in the wall for drainage purposes and pedestrian circulation. 1 C: Why not identify places for additional sculptures within the park - perhaps look at a sculpture program. o P: Another good suggestion and something that will be discussed as the master plan is finalized. 1 C: Moving the Enos Mills statue is risky; it is very heavy, the patina on the bronze could be damaged, and it is attached to the sandstone base with epoxy. Wouldn't moving the sculpture be expensive? - L o P: If an experienced contractor takes proper care and uses the appropriate equipment, the statue should be able to be moved without being damaged and at a reasonable cost give the scale of the 0roject. In addition the statue would only be moved around 50'to 'the south-southwest. The current plan shows it being placed in a prominent,loca'tion, surrounded by a sandstone plaza, at the intersection of the diagonal walk and the main events plaza. 2 Public Forum #2 Summary Meeting Date: October 8,2009 Page 3 of 3 o C: Another individual was personally aware of two instances where Loveland moved large heavy sculptures without damage, so it is possible. 1 C: Could the Enos Mills sculpture be lighted at night? Also it may be worth noting that the artist designed the sculpture so small children could climb on the dog o P: Lighting the sculpture is probably realistic as long as the glare can be controlled. > C: Will the Bollards have lights in them? o P: That decision has not been made yet but it is possible. Cities often choose not to use lighted bollards as they tend to be higher maintenance and can be vandal prone. > C: Feels the ice rink is very important - is it big enough? How do we expand if we want/need to? o P: The ice rink is shown at around 90' x 50' oval, which is equal to the size of rinks in Longmont and Boulder. Could look at the potential of building flexibility into the plan to use a larger rink. 1 C: He is a business owner north of the park and likes the idea of the removable shade structure for the stage since it opens up views to those shops. Also appreciates the reduction in the tree canopy in this plan. > C: How necessary is the fire pit? Is it too large? o P: Given the winter conditions and the wind, a fire pit seems like an important amenity i f there is an ice rink. The fire pit will probably have a wide seat wall (+/- 2,) around a 4' to 5' fire pit area. 3 Ice Rink BAYSIDE DISTRICT Request for Proposals June 10,2009 RESPOND TO: Andrew Thomas Director of Operations Bayside District Corporation 1351 Third Street Suite 201 Santa Monjca, CA 90401 Tel: (310) 393-8355 Fax: (310) 458-3921 Email: athomas@bavsidedistrict.org 1 ICE RINK REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS The Bayside District Corporation (BDC), a non-profit public benefit corporation, is seeking proposals from companies interested in building and potentially operating a seasonal ice rink in Downtown Santa Monica. In its sole discretion, the BDC reserves the right to (1) withdraw this Request for Proposals (RFP) without notice, (2) accept or reject any or all submittals, and (3) accept submittals which deviate from the RFP as the BDC deems appropriate and in its best interest. The BDC reserves the right to negotiate with any, all or none of the applicants responding to the RFP. Following submission, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information, and assurances relating to the purpose of building and operating an ice rink. Presentations regarding submissions may be required at the sole discretion of the BDC and may include a review of services offered at other locations. Any and all costs and expenses associated with the preparation of any report or statement in response to the RFP shall be borne by the applicant. The BDC.shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this RFP and/or this selection and award process or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this RFP who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this disclaimer and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof. The BDC reserves the right to use any information submitted in response to this document in any manner it deems appropriate in evaluating the services proposed. Proposals from interested applicants must be received bv 4:00 p.m. on Wednesdav, Juiv 1, 2009 at the BDC office. Responders must submit one electronic copy and five (5) hard copies to the BDC. Any questions regarding this RFP should be submitted to: Andrew Thomas, Director of Operations Bayside District Corporation 1351 Third Street Promenade Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90401 (310) 393-8355 athomas@baysidedistrict. org It is anticipated that the Contractor for the services described herein will be selected within 30 days of the release of this RFP to allow time to finalize the contract and complete any other organization necessities prior to commencement. 2 Overview The Bayside District Corporation hosts ICE at Santa Monica, an ice rink at 1320 Fifth Street. ICE is very popular with the Santa Monica community and its reach encompasses the Greater Los Angeles area and stretches into Orange County. Last season, ICE was open from November 6th _ Jan 19th and hosted 56,000 skaters and countless spectators. ICE garnered significant media . attention on local network news and in the Los Angeles Times and Santa Monica publications. Project Description Bayside is seeking proposals for the complete installation and strike of a fully-functional seasonal ice rink to be located at 1320 Fifth Street in Downtown Santa Monica. Bayside is also re4uesting proposals for the day-to-day management of ice rink operations. The rink must be open for business on Friday, October 30,2009, and run through Monday, January 18,2010. The hours of operation are 10 a.m. until 10 p.m. minimum, seven days a week including holidays. Additional hours may be required upon mutual agreement. The size of the rink must be approximately 7,700 square feet and be built according to Best Practices. Contractor's Responsibilities Responsibilities are divided into Part A: Ice Rink Equipment Rental ~nd Installation and Removal; and Part B. Management and Day-to-Day Operation of the Event. Part A: â€¢ Professional Project Manager assigned to project â€¢ Pre-design site plan to meet the standards of the BDC and Santa Monica building code â€¢ Description of the base set up for the ice rink (sandbox or other) â€¢ Detailed, written description of refrigeration system, including equipment, chemicals, etc. â€¢ Modular Railing System (white poly facing toward rink; room for vinyl decal sponsor graphics inside the rink area, banners outside the rink perimeter) â€¢ Ice Rink Maintenance Equipment; Ice Resurfacing Machine â€¢ Minimum 500 pairs Rental Ice Skates, sharpened, ready-to-skate â€¢ Rubber Floor Coverihg (4,500-sq. ft) â€¢ Viewing Area to surround rink (and as header cover) 3 â€¢ Blue TurfCarpet to finish rink perimeter/ edge â€¢ All professional supervision and general labor for set-up and strike â€¢ General Carpentry and Finish-Out of rink perimeter â€¢ All Tools, Equipment, and Supplies for Set-Up/Strike; Forklift â€¢ Refrigeration Technician On-Call 24 hours during entire term 4 â€¢ Commercial General Liability Coverage consistent with City of Santa Monica requirements â€¢ Text for Liability-Related Signage and Written Waiver Release Forms; Liability- Limitation Instructions â€¢ Santa Monica business license Part B: â€¢ Professional and experienced on-site manager or assistant manager on-duty all operating hours. The manager shall have recreation or amusement industry experience in the area of liability prevention; management o f the day-to-day functions ofthe rink operation. â€¢ Day-to-day operating personnel to affect a high degree of customer service; to include cashier functions, skate rental attendants, safety monitors, ice maintenance, and ice technician functions. Level of staffing shall be based upon attendance levels subject to industry standards. â€¢ All human resource functions for ice rink-specific personnel, local staff recruitment, payroll and taxation functions; worker's compensation insurance. â€¢ Employee uniforms â€¢ Established cash management system â€¢ Tickets & Skates kiosk, including counter and shelving for skates â€¢ Benches for skate change area â€¢ Day-to-day operating supplies including cash register, consecutively-numbered wristbands or stickers, towels, disinfectant for skates, anti-bacterial hand cream for staff, etc. â€¢ First-aid supplies; written emergency response plan determined in advance of event, with coordination with local authorities; written general security action plan determined in advance of event, with coordination with local authorities. 4 - â€¢ E-mail/phone-based group reservation system â€¢ Cash register equipment; wireless credit card machinery/supplies â€¢ Sound system; appropriate holiday and popular music selections; iPod music/announcement recording; professional pre-recorded announcements and general entertainment. â€¢ Text for BDC-provided signage for operating procedures and liability-limitation * issues â€¢ General consultation and assistance to BDC in the areas of event marketing, P.R., r. graphics, signing, website design and maintenance â€¢ All programming of on-ice skating activities â€¢ All programming of figure skating exhibitions, scheduling, talent, announcements â€¢ Coordination of group sales and special events â€¢ Retail sale activities of skating-related souvenirs, softgoods, socks, photo postcards, etc., with the BDC's approval of all inventory items; includes proper store fixtures â€¢ Liability insurance coverage with BDC and the City of Santa Monica named as additional insured â€¢ An estimation bf costs per skater â€¢ General Training for Rink/Event Manager regarding rink operation â€¢ Professional Support Services/Consultation for event planning and execution BDC's Responsibilities â€¢ 3-phase, 480-volt, 600-amp continuous power supply, BDC's electrician to connect BDC's side of service, on a timely basis as required within this Agreement; all electricity consumption; 110-volt power source for tools/kiosk/sound/lighting â€¢ If necessary, provide laser level sandbase by local crew, sized 2-feet outside rink footprint; topped with smooth, clean masons or bank-type sand, covered and secured with 6-mil clear plastic sheeting, and constructed so that rainwater flows AWAY from the ice surface and sandbase â€¢ Continuous water supply available immediately adjacent to the rink site â€¢ Picket fence or other barricade to define skate change area and control entry 5 . â€¢ All holiday decorations, as desired â€¢ Trash receptacles, trash removal; trash disposal â€¢ General housekeeping and grounds keeping of the rink area â€¢ General security presence â€¢ Identified parking in close proximity to the rink for Operator's personnel â€¢ Coordination of all permits and licenses required for installation and operation of the equipment and venue; total communication with local authorities, as required. â€¢ All event marketing, P.R., advertising, graphics, website creation/maintenance, and all rink site signing; liability signing to specifications of BDC; special emphasis on directional signing to rink, from all major traffic entry drives, and in pedestrian walkways. Personnel All personnel used by the Contractor under this program will be employees of the Contractor. Contractor shall pay all salaries, insurance and expenses, all federal social security taxes, federal and state unemployment taxes, and all other taxes relating to the employees. Contractor must comply with legal requirements including the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, Equal Opportunity Employment, and Americans with Disabilities Act. The wage minimum is $11 per hour. The BDC has the right to reject any of Contractor' s employees or request immediate replacement without cause. The Contractor, the Contractor's employees, and its subcontractors, shall be competent and careful workers skilled in their respective trades, and comply with the Santa Monica Living Wage. Subcontractors shall be subject to prior approval by BDC. The Contractor shall not knowingly employ nor contract with any person who engages in misconduct or is incompetent or negligent in due and proper performance of his or her duties and the Contractor must warrant the fitness of all employees. All personnel must pass a thorough background check and pass a 10-panel drug test to be administered by the Contractor. The BDC shall have the right to require the Contractor to remove any employee who displays misconduct toward the public or public property, or is in any way discourteous or inappropriate to the public. Duration of the Contract 6 ./ I The term of this contract will be for the duration of the rink's operation and will commence on the initial date of construction and continue through the operation until the rink is dismantled at the end of the skating season. BDC may terminate the contract without penalty at any time,'with or without cause. In the event the contractor fails to perform services or is in default under the terms of.the contract, BDC may terminate the contract immediately and the contractor shall be paid only for the services provided, leks any damages or costs incurred by BDC in the termination of the contract. Insurance Requirements Contractor's Insurance Prior to commencing work, the Contractor shall procure and maintain at Contractor's own cost and expense for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work or > services hereunder by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. Â· The cost of such insurance shall be included in Contractor's bid. ' The BDC and the City of Santa Monica shhll be named as additional insured under such insurance policies and Contractor shall provide the BDC with Certificates of Insurance evidencing such insurance and proof of payment of insurance premiums. Contractor must notify the BDC within 24 hours of any cancellations of such insurance polices. Without in any way affecting the indemnity provided, the Contractor shall secure before commencement of the work and throughout the contract the following types and amounts of insurance: Minimum Limits of Insurance Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types and in the amounts described below (subject to modification prior to contract execution) 1) Commercial General Liability Insurance Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability (CGL) with a limit of not less than $6,000,000 each occurrence/$7,000,000 in the annual aggregate. 2) Business Auto Liability Insurance - Contractor shall maintain business auto liability with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. 3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance Contractor shall maintain workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 7 Minimum Scope of Insurance l) CGL insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products-completed operations, personal injury and advertising injury liability assumed under an insured contract (including the tort liability of another assumed in a business contract), and explosion, collapse and underground hazards. 2) Business Auto Insurance shall cover liability arising out of any auto (including owned, hired, and non-owned autos). Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01, CA 00 05, CA 00 12, CA 00 20, or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage equivalent to that provided in the 1990 and later editions of CA 00 01. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by BDC and the City of Santa Monica. At the option of the BDC and City of Santa Monica, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the BDC and the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers; or the Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the BDC and the City of Santa Monica guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claim administration and defense expenses. General Liability, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against BDC and the City of Santa Monica, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from activities and operations of Contractor in the performance of services under the contract. All Coverage 1) Each insurance required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the BDC and the City as set forth in the notice requirement of this Agreement. 2) If Contractor, for any reason, fails to maintain insurance coverage that is required pursuant to this Contract, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract. BDC and the City, at its sole option, may terminate this Contract and obtain damages from the Contractor resulting from said breach. Alternatively, BDC and the City may purchase such coverage (but has no special obligation to do so), and without further notice to the Contractor, BDC and the City may deduct from sums due to the Contractor any premium costs advanced by the BDC and the City for such insurance. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:6 unless otherwise approved by the City of Santa Monica's Risk Manager. 8 Subcontractors - Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificatesand endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the BDC and the City of Santa Monica with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required byÂ·this section. The certificates and endorsements for each policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverdge on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements should be on forms provided by the BDC or City of Santa Monica or on other than the BDC and City of Santa Monica's forms, provided those forms and endorsements conform to the requirements. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Santa Monica btfore work commences. The BDC and the City of Santa Monica reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time. Audit The BDC reserves the right to audit employee payroll lecords and review testing programs, policies and procedures, employee handbook, other written information, and observe training. Attachments EXHIBIT A 2008 Ice Rink Site Plan .4 ' 9 EXHIBIT A 'CC VAIN ENTRY Â£ 9GNING ON E*ISTING WAS:)NRY WALL 1 4 p -----*I"- I,~ 4 f *246~) a{4 al %. .l.49>~47: 16>\2 4 N \./. -- . h 0 7 ~ 7' A 11 i-----1 . .6/.t - 53' m 01 4 0 ... : D - f. 0 .i i 3 0 1 ~ i!Â·Uff, A 3 re,Â· 1 29 4 Trlo iw 1 85' m .... thi-,) ~ ----1~ E m V- * i.10 1 Un . 00 9 1 g . 1/ 7 1...3 * i], . 94 86 2 1 - #: 2. $.r e - il M 6 -6/ i li ?; 0 1/ 4 ./ LOGO GRAP-11( SPACE r Â£-ul 0 Â· rit -, .- Lli 1 f ~ Ilj p>m- .. , - 14)46 Â¢1.~'FORÂ¥~ 2 1 lemal ..1/'IM IME..7' . I a i 1 1 r 5, 5 2 - 1 2- 1 L / A PO /\/ .i '3, 14.-1.-42* JA '' 3 \ 11 . t- W Lu Â· ~,,~h NE P.%*2 , 49 /1 1 e@ Aluve Nx>-T.â€¢00-_, POIrrlilÂ£ IyNrrIATIC,I %./. FeÂ©~ 1*All) 4* , 1 4. 13 1 -Ir?*ar ..RS) OFF-4.-0,0. Al. EXISTING BANK BLDG 10 PICKET FENCE TO DEFINE THE SITE 3218 -- .~h ST-R~Â»J- *i Â¥38Â¥ SIH1 NI 53H0N38 )19 631871 nkIH1 3AIBO SERVICE ENTRY >INVB 9NUSIX3 Z.+ -R I AS REC'D FE ESTES PARK ICE RINK OPERATIONS To understand the costs associated with constructing and operating an ice skating rink in Bond Park, the consultant team sought an estimate from a qualified ice rink concessionaire. This provider offered costs to both purchase and rent the ice rink and supporting equipment. The following charts demonstrate total cost for an ice iink in Bond Park. Please note that estimates were based on a 4,500 square foot ice rink. ICE RINK RENTAL One option for the Town is to work with a concessionaire to rent equipment to build and maintain the rink, as well as the ice skates, each season. Several businesses throughout the country offer ice rink rental, alleviating the burden to the Town of a substantial up-front cost for all the equipment. The costs to rent all the equipment necessary for ice rink options includes: EQUIPMENT PRICE Ice Rink (including rink materials, dasher boards, $92,500 per season chiller; pumps and all materials required for operation) Ice Skates (300 pair) . Included Ice Resurfacer $3,500 per season TOTAL $96,000 per season NOTE: These estimates are based on rink rental and operation from Thanksgiving to January 1. These costs are for rental of the ice rink for one season. If the Town opted to rent the equipment, the TOWN WOULD ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR: â€¢ Providing 4 laborers to help with installation and teardown â€¢ Providing a laser-level site that's prepped and ready for rink placements â€¢ 3-phase 460-volt power (200-300 amps) â€¢ Use of a forklift and forklift operator on-site to get equipment from the truck to set-up and vice versa during teardown â€¢ Use of a crane for a short period of time to lift the chiller from truck to site and vice versa during teardown For that rental fee, the concessionaire would provide a working supervisor on site during set-up and teardown, but the Town would be responsible for maintaining the rink while it was in operation. Best practices shows that the parks and recreation staff of many communities are responsible for ice rink operations in the winter. The concessionaire would provide training on caring for the ice and the rink system. ICE RINK PURCHASE - Purchasing the equipment to build and operate an ice rink brings with it a heftier up-front cost, but does provide benefit in that the Town can spread out the costs of the ownership over a longer-term, be more flexible from year to year on ticket and skate rental prices, and will within three years have saved money over the expense of renting a rink each year. The costs to own all the equipment necessary to operate a rink include: EQUIPMENT PRICE Ice Rink (including rink materials, dasher boards, $260,000 to $270,000 chiller, pumps and all materials required for operation) Ice Skates (300 pair) $15,000 to $18,000 Ice Resurfacer - $15,000 to $20,000 TOTAL $290,000 to $308,000 Among the other benefits to owning the equipment is that the ice rink can stay in operation for a longer period of time each season than if the Town were to rent. Keeping the rink open can provide for more revenue generation from ticket sales and skate rentals. One other option that many vendors will provide is the opportunity to contract to rent the rink for three years and then purchase the equipment at the end of that term at a reduced price. This is a nice option for a community starting up rink operations that is unsure of how popular or well-used the rink will be and allows the Town to have flexibility to do a "test- run" and still own the equipment later. Finally, there will be other expenses to consider, regardless of whether the rink is rented or owned. Some ofthose additional expenses may include: â€¢ Lighting for night skating â€¢ Sound system and music â€¢ Holiday decorations â€¢ Ticket/concession/skate sales and rental booth and operations â€¢ Staffing costs Estimates provided by: MagiclceUSA Byron Sharp 305-255-4144 www.magiciceusa. com COVERING RINK COSTS AND OPERATIONS Most ice rinks are funded and operated through a mix of revenues from ticket sales and skate rentals, and sponsorship donations. Estes Park would need to determine the best model for subsidizing the costs. A quick look at ticket and skate rental costs at similar rinks in the foothills suggests the following pricing scheme: Adult Ticket $6.00 Child Ticket $4.00 Skate Rental $3.00 Best practices research also leads us to the assumption that the rink could realistically aim to draw 5,000 skaters per season (based upon being in operation from Thanksgiving to January 1). Looking at these costs, the Town could assume that approximately $40,000 per year could be generated from ticket sales and skate rentals. Remaining financial support for the rink would have to be found through other sources, most likely sponsorships and private donations and partnerships with other community entities. FULL MASTER PLAN IN ONE PHASE --OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Dec-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Hom Engineering / Architectural Engineering Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design COST PER COST PER SUB- QUANTITY UNIT UNIT ITEM TOTAL 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS, INSURANCE AND FEES (3%) 1 LS $41,496.95 $41,496.95 $41,497 a. MOBILIZATION AND TEMPORARY FACILITIES (3%) 1 LS $41,496.95 $41,496.95 $41,497 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25 000 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500 4 CUT AND CAP EXISTING UTILITY LINES {ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000,00 $5,000 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILITY PROVIDER) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 5 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION/CLEARING AND GRUBBING MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING . 1.60 AC $3,000.00 $4,796.83 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVE / RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS, ETC) 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 REMOVE TURF 21,429 SF $100 $21,429.35 TREEREMOVAL 13 EA $300.00 $3,900.00 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING (PARKING ALONG PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR) 1,943 SY $6.50 $12,628.78 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING (PERIMETER WALK, TURN ISLAND ON MACGREGOR AND AT POLICE CORNER) 560 SY $12.00 $6,721,33 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 1,451 LF $6.00 $8,706.00 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS 252 SY $5.50 $1,387.83 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING 270 SF $10.00 $2,700.00 DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500,00 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 60 LF $35.00 $2,100.00 DEMO TIMBER / CONCRETE STEPS . 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR - NORTHEAST PLANTER) 25 LF $15.00 $375.00 DEMO / SALVAGE SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL BOXES 9 EA $550,00 $4,950.00 DEMO, SALVAGE, OR MOVE MISC, UTILITY APPURTANCES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $3,500.00 $3,500.00 RELOCATE AND STORE/PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500,00 PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 5 EA $500.00 $2,500.00 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE Â· 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP, D. FTN., SITE FURN., HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 i $101,195 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL (+/- 6" DEPTH OVER 0.90 AC) 726 CY $6.00 $4,356.00 $4,356 8 EARTHWORK CUT (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0 9 ACRE SITE (ALLOWANCE) 1,452 CY $6.00 $8,712.00 FILL (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.9 ACRE SITE (ALLOWANCE) 4 1,452 CY $6.00 $8,712.00 IMPORTED/EXPORTED FILL (ALLOWANCE) 500 CY $25.00 $12,500.00 . $29,924 9 MISC. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE (SIDEWALK CHASES, ETC) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 11 3/4" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) , 100 LF $35.00 $3,500.00 $3,500 12 2- TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) . 50 LF $45.00 $2,250.00 $2,250 13 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY - EXISTING LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 . $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $3,000,00 $3,000.00 $3,000 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (+6 325 LF AT 2' WIDTH) 49 TON $165.00 $8,164.20 $8,164 17 3Â· CONCRETE PAN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 250 LF $15.00 $3,750.00 $3,750 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) - 300 SF $75,00 $22,500.00 $22,500 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20'*30') Â· 600 SF $100.00 $60,000.00 $60,000 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER (SEMI-CUSTOM) , 1,000 SF $80.00 $80,000.00 $80,000 22 SKATE RENTAL/ HOT CHOCOLATE/CHILLER BUILDING (10')163 - 160 SF $200.00 $32,000.00 $32,000 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONAIRE) 1 :0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT (18" HT) 166 FF $40.00 $6,640.00 $6,640 STAGE (2' HT) 93 FF $40.00 $3,700.00 $3,700 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS 7 EA $450.00 $3,150.00 $3,150 SITE LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 23 EA $300,00 $6,900.00 $6,900 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE - CONC. W/ SANDSTONE CAP (18"HT ) DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL 813 FF $30.00 $24,375.00 $24,375 SANDSTONE CAP 250 SF $40.00 $10,000.00 $10,000 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000 28 4' INSIDE DIA. FIRE PIT WITH 24"WIDE SEAT WALL 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000 Page 1 Master Plan 29 NEW PLANTER CURB (DETAILED TO MATCH EXT. PLANTERS @ ELKHORN & MACGREGOR) 65 LF $30.00 $1,950.00 $1,950 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 165 LF $30.00 $4,950.00 $4,950 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (AT RAMPS DOWN TO PARK LANE/BUS LANE FROM RAISED MACGREGOR) 277 LF $18.00 $4,986.00 $4,986 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 5 EA $850.00 $4,250.00 $4,250 33 CONCRETE STEPS STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 40 LF $30.00 $1,200.00 $1,200 MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER 43 LF $30.00 $1,290.00 $1,290 34 STEP HANDRAILS 45 LF $125.00 $5,625.00 $5,625 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS 24 LF $100.00 $2,400.00 $2,400 36 6" CONCRETE PAVING (SIDEWALKS, POLICE CORNER, AND STAGE) 3,408 SF $5.25 $17,892.00 $17,892 37 6- CONCRETE PAVING WITH SANDSTONE INSETS DIAGONAL WALK) 1,354 SF $8.50 $11,509.00 $11,509 38 6" TINTED / SCORED CONCRETE PAVING (MACGREGOR AND PARKING ON PARK LANE) 14,775 SF $8.00 $118,200.00 $118,200 39 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING 12,712 SF $14.00 $177,968.00 $177,968 40 SANDSTONE PAVING 3,233 SF $30.00 $96,990.00 $96,990 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 5 EA $1,200.00 $6,000,00 $6,000 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE) 3 EA $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE) 5 EA $1,200.00 $6,000.00 $6,000 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXISTING) 7 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDREN'S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE 225 SF $18.00 $4,050.00 $4,050 47 REINSTALL ENOS MILLS STATUE 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS (+/- 7' DIA) 3 EA $1,500.00 $4.500.00 $4,500 MEDIUM PLANTERS (+/- 5' DIA) 3 EA $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000 SMALL PLANTERS (+6 2.5' DIA) 2 EA $650.00 $1,30000 $1,300 49 EVENT TENT TIE-DOWNS 225 EA $100.00 $22,500.00 $22,500 50 TREE GRATES (DOES NOT INCLUDE TREE GUARDS) 16 EA $1,400.00 $22,400.00 $22,400 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACES 30 EA $1,200.00 $36,000.00 $36,000 52 AMENDED / SUB DRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND/ SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' 0.C. 17,244 SF $3.50 $60,354.00 $60,354 FINE GRADING 17,244 SF $0.10 $1,724.40 $1,724 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOD BLEND 17,244 SF $1.00 $17,244.00 $17,244 54 2.5"SHADETREES 32 EA $375,00 $12,000.00 $12000 55 2" AND 8'CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 10 EA $350.00 $3,500.00 $3,500 56 8' EVERGREEN TREES 2 EA $400.00 $800.00 $800 57 10' EVERGREEN TREES 2 EA $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000 58 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRU8S (ALLOWANCE) 150 EA $30.00 $4,500.00 $4,500 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 50 EA $35.00 $1,750.00 $1,750 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 25 EA $38.00 $950,00 $950 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE) 75 EA $40.00 $3,000.00 $3,000 62 1 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS (ALLOWANCE) 250 EA $15.00 $3,750.00 $3,750 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC 6,375 SF $1.25 $7,968.75 $7,969 64 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWN'S SCADA SYSTEM) 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000 IRRIGATION - TREES IN TREE GRATES 16 SF $150.00 $2,400.00 $2,400 IRRIGATION - BLUEGRASS TURF AREAS 17,244 SF $0.85 $14,657.40 $14,657 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 6,375 SF $1.25 $7,968.75 $7,969 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGN 1 EA $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000 66 RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 3 EA $400.00 $1,200,00 $1,200 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMP 1 EA $5,600.00 $5,600.00 $5,600 68 GAS LINE TO FIRE PIT (INCLUDING ASPHALT PATCH ALLOWANCE) 75 LF $40.00 $3,000.00 $3,000 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $12,000.00 $12,000.00 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SITE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 EA $0.00 $O.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING: UP-LIGHTING, WATER FEATURE LIGHTING, ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Page 2 Master Plan POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) Â· 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000,00 RESET EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES 9 EA $1,500.00 $13,500.00 $69,500 BID ITEM TOTAL (Without GC's, Insurance, Bonds, Fees and Mobilization) $1,383,232 SUBTOTAL W/ GCÂ·s, INSURANCE, BONDS, FEES, AND MOBILIZATION $1,466,226 Estimating Contingency (10%) 10.00 % Â· $146,623 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT GRAND TOTAL $1,612,848 'COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Construction Contingency (5%) 1 % $80,642 Design Fee Allowance (8%) 1 LS $129,028 Materials Testing During Construction 1 LS $15,000 Town Staff Costs 1 LS $0 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Elediical / Gas Fees 1 LS $0 Printing Bid Sets 1 LS $1,500 PROJECT TOTAL WITH ALL COSTS ~ $1,839,018 Page 3 Master Plan PIIASE 1. MACGREGOR AVENUE -- OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Dec-09 Winston Associates. Inc. / Van Horn Engineering / Architectural Engineering Design Group / Avocel Irrigation Design COST PER COST PER SUB- QUANTITY UNIT UNIT ITEM TOTAL 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS, INSURANCE AND FEES (4.5%) 1 LS $12,245.94 $12,245.94 $12,246 a. MOBILIZATION AND TEMPORARY FACILITIES (4.5%) 1 LS $12,245.94 $12,245.94 $12,246 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILITY PROVIDER) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $4,000 4 CUT AND CAP EXISTING BOND PARK UTILITY LINES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000 5 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION/CLEARING AND GRUBBING MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.41 AC $3,000.00 $1,239.67 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVE / RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS, ETC) 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 REMOVE TURF 2,250 SF $1.00 $2,250.00 TREE REMOVAL 0 EA $300.00 $0.00 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING (MACGREGOR AVENUE PAVING) 1,747 SY $6.50 $11,357.67 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING (PERIMETER WALK S.OF NE PLAZA, TURN ISLAND AT MACGREGOR, & AT POLICE) 140 SY $12.00 $1,680.00 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 625 LF $6.00 $3,750.00 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS 0 SY $5.50 $0.00 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING 0 SF $10.00 $0.00 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $7,500.00 $0.00 DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER / CONCRETE STEPS 0 LS $500.00 $0.00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR -- NORTHEAST PLANTER) 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 DEMO / SALVAGE SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL BOXES 3 EA $550.00 $1,650.00 DEMO, SALVAGE, OR MOVE MISC. UTILITY APPURTENANCES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $3.000.00 $3.000.00 RELOCATE AND STORE / PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE AND OTHER MONUMENTS IMPACTED BY PHASE 1 0 LS $2,500.00 $0.00 PROTECT EXISTING LARGE COTTONWOOD GROVE TO REMAIN 1 EA $800.00 $800.00 REMOVE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP / SALVAGE AND RESET HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $27,727 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE-SPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL (+1- 6- DEPTH OVER 0.90 AC) 0 CY $6.00 $0.00 $0 8 EARTHWORK CUT (AL-LOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.45 ACRE PHASE I AREA (ALLOWANCE) 726 CY $6.00 $4,356.00 FILL (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.45 ACRE PHASE I AREA (ALLOWANCE) 726 CY $6.00 - $4,356.00 IMPORTED/EXPORTED FILL (ALLOWANCE) 100 CY $25.00 $2.500.00 $11,212 9 MISC. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE (SIDEWALK CHASES, ETC) 1 LS $7.000.00 $7.000.00 $7,000 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 11 3/4-TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE} 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 $0 12 2" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $45.00 $0.00 $0 13 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY - EXISTING LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 $0 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (+1- 241 LF AT 2' WIDâ„¢ AND 479 SF AT NEW PARK LANE SPACES) 38 TON $165.00 $6,342.60 $6,343 17 3' CONCRETE PAN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 $0 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1 500 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) 0 SF $75.00 $0.00 $0 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20 x30') 0 SF $100.00 $0.00 $0 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER (SEMI-CUSTOM) 0 SF $100.00 $0.00 $0 22 SKATE RENTAL / HOT CHOCOLATE / CHILLER BUILDING (10' x 16Â·) 0 SF $200.00 $0.00 $0 1 Phasel 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONAIRE) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT (18' HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 STAGE (2' HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS 0 EA $450.00 $0.00 $0 SITE LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 0 EA $300.00 $0.00 $0 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE - CONC. Wl SANDSTONE CAP (18"HT ) DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL Â· 0 FF $30.00 $0.00 $0 SANDSTONE CAP 0 SF $40.00 $0.00 $0 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) - 0 LS $100,000.00 $0.00 $0 , 28 4'INSIDE DIA. FIRE PITWITH 24' WIDE SEATWALL 0 LS $20,000.00 $0.00 . $0 29 NEW PLANTER CURB , 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 0 LF $30.00 $0,00 $0 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (AT RAMPS DOWN TO PARK LANE/BUS LANE FROM RAISED MACGREGOR) 257 LF $18.00 $4,626.00 $4.626 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 0 EA $850.00 $0.00 $0 33 CONCRETE STEPS STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER + 0 LE $30.00 $0.00 $0 34 STEP HANDRAILS 0 LF - Â· $125.00 $0.00 $0 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS 0 LF $100.00 $0.00 Â· $0 36 6" CONCRETE PAVING (10' SIDEWALK SOUTH OF NORTHEAST PLAZA, NEW WALK AT POLICE ENTRY DRIVE, 1,612 SF $5.25 $8,463.00 $8,463 AND TEMP INFILL CONCRETE AT FUTURE NORTHEAST PLAZA) 37 6" CONCRETE PAVING WITH SANDSTONE INSETS (DIAGONAL WALK) 0 SF $6.50 $0.00 $0 38 6" TINTED / SCORED CONCRETE PAVING (MACGREGOR AVENUE) 12,525 SF $8.00 $100,200.00 $100,200 39 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING (FOR EVENTS TENTS SOUTH OF NORTHEAST PLAZA & AT NE CORNER NECKDOWN) 1,179 SF $14.00 $16,506.00 $16,506 40 SANDSTONE PAVING AROUND NORTHEAST PLAZA 0 SF $30.00 $0.00 $0 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1.200.00 $0.00 $0 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1.000.00 $0.00 $0 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,200.00 $0.00 $0 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 0 EA $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDRENÂ·S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE (ALLOWANCE) Â· 0 LS $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE SF $18.00 $0-00 $0 47 REINSTALL ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS (+/- 7' DIA) 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 MEDIUM PLANTERS (+A 5' DIA) 0 EA $1,000.00 $0.00 SMALL PLANTERS (+6 2.5' DIA) 0 EA $650.00 $0.00 $0 49 EVENT TENT TIE-DOWNS 146 EA $100.00 $14,600.00 $14,600 50 TREE GRATES (DOES NOT INCLUDE TREE GUARDS) 3 EA $1,400.00 $4,200.00 $4,200 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACES 19 EA $1,20000 $22,800.00 $22.800 52 AMENDED / SUB DRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND / SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' O.C. 0 SF $3.50 $0.00 $0 FINE GRADING TO REPLACE TURF DAMAGED BY PHASE 1 WORK 650 SF $0.10 $65.00 $65 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOD BLEND 650 SF $1.00 $650.00 $650 54 2,5-SHADE TREES 6 EA $37500 $2,250.00 $2,250 55 2- AND 8' CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 4 EA $350.00 $1.400.00 $1.400 56 8' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 $0 2 Phasel 2 22 57 10' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $500.00 $0.00 $0 58 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 20 EA $30.00 $600.00 $600 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) . 15 EA $35.00 $525.00 $525 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 5 EA $38.00 $190.00 $190 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE) 5 EA $40.00 $200.00 $200 62 1 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS 0 EA $15.00 $0.00 $0 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC (ALLOWANCE) 1,250 SF $1.25 $1,562.50 $1,563 64 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 4 IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWN'S SCADA SYSTEM) 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 IRRIGATION - TREES IN TREE GRATES 3 SF $150.00 $450.00 IRRIGATION - RESTORE IRRIGATION TO SOD AREAS IMPACTED BY PHASE I WORK (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 SF $0.85 $0.00 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 1.250 SF $1.25 $1,562.50 $5,013 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGN 0 EA $6,000.00 $0.00 $0 66 RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 $0 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMP 0 EA $5,600.00 $0.00 $0 68 GAS LINE TO FIRE PIT (INCLUDING ASPHALT PATCH ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $40.00 $0.00 $0 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $12,000.00 $12,000.00 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SITE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING: UP-LIGHTING. WATER FEATURE LIGHTING. ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $15,000.00 $0.00 POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $4,000.00 $0.00 RESET EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $22,500 BID ITEM TOTAL (Without GC's, Insurance, Bonds, Fees and Mobilization) $272,132 SUBTOTAL W/ GC's, INSURANCE, BONDS, FEES, AND MOBILIZATION , $296,624 Estimating Contingency (11%) 11.00 % $32,629 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT GRAND TOTAL $329,252 COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Construction Contingency (9%) 1 LS $29,633 Design Fee Allowance (8.5%) 1 LS $27.986 Materials Testing During Construction 1 LS $4,000 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Electrical / Gas Fees 1 LS $0 Printing Bid Sets 1 LS $800 PROJECT TOTAL WITH ALL COSTS $391,672 3 Phasel . . PHASE II: NORTHEAST PLAZA - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Deo-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Hom Engineering / ArchRectural Engineering Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design COST PER COST PER SUB- QUANTITY UNrr UNIT ITEM TOTAL 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS,BONDS, INSURANCE AND PEES{5.5%) -1 LS $11,96868 ,$11,966.48 $11,967 a. MOBILIZATION AFOTERPORARYFACIUTI55 (5.596) 1 LS $11,06668 $11 966.68 $11.967 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY . i _ ,T _ 1 1.9 15,0Â® 00 55,000.00 $5.000 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 4 CUTANDCAP EXISâ„¢GUTILITY LINES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,060.00 BLOOM,00 $1,000 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILI1Y PROVIDER) 0 LS $000 $0.00 , S MISCELLANEOUS DEMOUTIONiCLEARNG AND GRUBBING , MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING 025 AC $3,000.00 $750.00 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOUTION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVEE /RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS, ETC) 1 LS $1 000-00 $1.000.00 REMOVE TURF 8139 SF Sl.00 $8,139.00 TREE REMOVAL 5 EA $300.00 $1,500.00 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING (PARKING ALONG PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR) 0 SY $6.50 $0.00 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING (PERIMETER WALK IN PLAZA LOCATION) 150 SY $12.00 $1.800.00 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 65 LF $6.00 $390.00 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS , 100 SY $5.50 $550.00 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING 0 SF $10.00 $0.00 DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $7,500.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER / CONCRETE STEPS 0 LS $500.00 $0.00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR - NORTHEAST PLANTER) 5 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 DEMO /.SALVAGE SITE UGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL- BOXES 1 EA $55000 $550.00 DEMO, SALVAGE. OR MOVE MISC UTILITY APPURTANCES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,00000 $1,000.00 RELOCATE AND STORE/PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE 1 LS $2.50000 $2.500.00 PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 0 EA $500.00 $0.00 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL. PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP, D. FTN., SITE FURN., HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 ,LS $18.179 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL(+/- 6- DEPTH OVER 0.20 AC) 0 CY $6.00 $0.00 $0 8 BARTHWORK CUT (ALLOWANCE)Â· 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.2 ACRE PHASE !1 (ALLOWANCE) 323 CY $6.00 $1,936.00 FILLCALLOWANCEDÂ· 1 FOOTAVG ACROSS 0.2 ACRE PHASEE It (ALLOWANCE) 323 CY $6.00 $1.93600 IMF>ORTEDJEXPORTED FILL (AUOWANCE) 100 CY $2500 $2.500.00 $6,372 0 MISC STORMDRAINIMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE(aDEWACK CHASES, Erm - 1 LS 52,50090 ' $2,50000 $0 k 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 11 3/4" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 $0 12 2- TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $45.00 $0.00 $0 13 FIRE HYDRAhIT ASSEMBLY - EXISnNG LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0,00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 $0 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (4 325 LF AT 2Â· WIDTH) 0 TON $165.00 $0.00 $0 17 3' CONCRETE PAN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 $0 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $1,500.00 $0.00 $0 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) 0 SF $75.00 $0.00 $0 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20â€¢x301 0 SF $100.00 $0.00 $0 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER (SEMICUSTOM) 0 SF $80.00 $0.00 $0 22 SKATE RENTAL / HOT CHOCOLATE / CHILLER BUILDING (10Â·*16') 0 SF $200.00 $0400 $0 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONA]RE) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT<18 HT) . 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 So STAGE (2' HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS 0 EA $450.00 $0.00 $0 SITE LANDSCAPE- BOULDERS 0 EA $300.00 $0.00 $0 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE - CONC. W; SANDSTONE CAP (18-HT ) DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL 0 FF $30.00 $0.00 $0 SANDSTONE CAP 0 SF $40.00 $0,00 $0 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) D LS $100,000.00 $0.00 $0 â€¢ 1 . Phase Il 28 4' INSIDE DIA. FIRE PIT WIâ„¢ 24"WIDE SEAT WALL 0 LS $20,00000 $0.00 $0 29 NEW PLANTER CURB 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $18.00 $0.00 $0 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 0 EA $850.00 $0.00 $0 33 CONCRETE STEPS STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 0 IF $3000 $0.00 $0 MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER 0 IF $30.00 $0.00 $0 34 STEP HANDRAILS 0 LF $125.00 $0.00 $0 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS 0 LF $100.00 $0.00 $0 36 6- CONCRETE PAVING 0 SF $5.25 $0.00 $0 37 6- CONCRETE PAVING W[TH SANDSTONE INSETS (DIAGONAL WALK) 0 SF $8.50 $0.00 $0 38 6" TINTED / SCORED CONCRETE PAVING(MACGREGOR AND PARKING ON PARK LANE) 0 SF $8.00 $0.00 $0 19 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING - Â·- Â· Â· 7.075 SF $14'00 $99,050 CIO $09.050 40 SANDSTONE PAVING 1,610 SF $3000 $48,30000 $48,300 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 0~ - r 2 EA $1200 00 $2,400 00 $2,400 4 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,000.00 $0.00 $0 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE) . I EA 51 200 00. $1.200 00 $1.200 ; 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 0 EA $5,000.00 $000 $0 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXIS-G) Â· 0 EA $000 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDREN S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $5,00000 $0.00 $0 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE 0 SF $18.00 $0.00 $0 47 REINSTALL ENOSMILLS STATUE . 1 16 $2.000.00 $10,00 2,000 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS f +/- 7Â· DIA) 2 EA $1,500 00, $3,000.00 $3,000 MEDIUM PLANTERS (+A 5'DIA) 2 EA 31.000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000 SMALL PLANTERS Â» 2.5' DIA) 1 EA $650.00 $650.00 $650 49 EVENT TENT nE-DOWNS 0 EA $100.00 $0.00 $0 55 TREGGRATES{DOESNOTINCLUDETREEGUARDS) n 7 EA $1,40000 $0,80000 10:Boo 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACES 0 ELA $1 200.00 $0.00 $0 52 AMENDED / SUB DRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND / SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' O.C. 0 SF $3.50 $0.00 $0 FINE GRADING 0 SF $0.10 $0.00 $0 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOD BLEND 0 SF $1.00 $0.00 $0 54 2.5" SHADE TREES , .. 7 EA $375.00 $2.625.00 $2.9 55 2" AND 8' CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 0 EA $350.00 $0.00 SO 56 W EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 $0 57 10Â· EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $500 00 $0.00 $0 58 5 GAUON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $30.00 $0.00 $0 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $35.00 $0.00 $0 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $38.00 $0.00 $0 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $40.00 $0.00 $0 62 1 GAUON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $15.00 $0.00 $0 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONIROL FABRIC 0 SF $1.25 $0.00 $0 64 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWNÂ·S SCADA SYSTEM) 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 $0 IRRIGAnON -TREES IN TREE GRATES ' 7 .SF $30000 $2,100.00 $2,100 IRRIGATION - BLUEGRASS TURF AREAS 0 SF $0.85 $0.00 $0 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 0 SF $1.25 $0.00 $0 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGN 0 EA $6,000.00 $0.00 $0 66 RULESANDREGULAnONSSIGNAGE{ALLOWANCE) 1 EA $40000 $40000 $400 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMP 0 EA $5,600 00 $0.00 $0 68 GASUNETOAREPIT0NCLUD1HGASPHALTPATCHALLOWANCE) 75 0 $40.00 0,00000 $3.000 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $12,000.00 $0.00 DSTRIOUTION SYSTEM FOR SnE (AU.OWANCE) 1 LS , 36.ODO.00 $6,000.00 2 Phase 11 RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING: UP-LIGHTING, WATER FEATURE LIGHTING, ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $15,000.00 $0.00 POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $4,000.00 $0.00 - RESET EXISTING LIGWr FIXTURES '' 3 ' ~ EA $1,50000 $415% 00 - $10.500 3217,678 Bft) ITEIN TOTAL )R hout GOs, Insuranc*, eonds, Nes and MobAIzation) . _ . _ $241,509 Estimating tortwigency (13%) 80 % $31.396 CONSTRUCTION CONâ„¢*CT GRAND TOTAL '$272,906 - COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CON1RACT ConsbÂ·uction Cont,ngency (9.25%) 1 LS $25.244 Design Fee Allowance (996) 1 LS $24,562 Materials Testing Quring Const,uction 1 LS $3,000 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Electncal / Gas Fees 1 LS $0 - - 1. LS- 1 $600_ ' Ptitting Sid Sets . $326,211 PROJECT TOTAL WITHALL COSTS 4, . t. 3 Phase 11 PHASE 111: FESTIVAL PROMENADE -- OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Dec-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Hom Engineenng / Architectural Engineering Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design COST PER COSTPER SUB- QUANTITY UNIT UNIT ITEM TOTAL 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS, INSURANCE AND FEES (6% 1 LS $10,119.57 $10.119.57 $10,120 a. MOBILIZATION AND TEMPORARY FACILITIES (6%1 1 LS $10,119.57 $10.119.57 $10,120 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 LS $5.000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500 4 CUT AND CAP EXISTING UTILITY LINES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILITY PROVIDER) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 5 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION/CLEARING AND GRUBBING MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.23 AC $3,000.00 $685.26 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVE / RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS. ETC) 1 LS $2.000.00 $2.000.00 REMOVE TURF 6,600 SF $1.00 $6,600.00 TREE REMOVAL 8 EA $300.00 $2,400.00 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING (PARKING ALONG PARK LANE) 272 SY $8.50 $1,769.44 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING (PERIMETER WALK) 99 SY $12.00 $1,18667 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 240 LF $6.00 $1.44000 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS 13 SY $5.50 $73.33 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING 0 SF $10.00 $0 OK) DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 0 LS $3.000.00 $0.00 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $7,500.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 60 LF $35.00 _ $2,100.00 DEMO TIMBER / CONCRETE STEPS 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR - NORTHEAST PLANTER) 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 DEMO / SALVAGE SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL BOXES 2 EA $550.00 $ 1 100.00 DEMO, SALVAGE, OR MOVE MISC. UTILITY APPURTANCES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 RELOCATE AND STORE/PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2.500.00 $0.00 PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 2 EA $500.00 $1,000.00 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP, D. FTN., SITE FURN. HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $24,355 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL (+A 6" DEPTH OVER 0.23 AC PHASE 11) 186 CY - $600 $1,113.20 $1,113, 8 EARTHWORK CUT (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.23 ACRE PHASE 11! (ALLOWANCE) 371 CY $6.00 $2,226.40 FILL (ALLOWANCE): al FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.23 ACRE PHASE 111 (ALLOWANCE) 323 CY $6.00 $1,936.00 IMPORTED/EXPORTED FILL (ALLOWANCE) 200 CY $25.00 $5,000.00 $9,162 9 MISC. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE (SIDEWALK CHASES, ETC 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 11 314"TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 $0 12 2" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $45.00 $0.00 $0 13 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY - EXISTING LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $3.000.00 $0.00 $0 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (+6 240 LF AT 2'WIDTH) 19 TON $165.00 53.168.00 $3,168 17 3'CONCRETE PAN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 0 200 LF $15.00 53.000.00 $3,000 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 $500 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) 0 SF $75.00 $0.00 $0 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20Â·*30') 0 SF $100.00 $O.00 $0 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER (SEMI-CUSTOM) 0 SF $80.00 $0.00 $0 22 SKATE RENTAL / HOT CHOCOLATE / CHILLER BUILDING (10Â·x16') 0 SF $200.00 $0.00 $0 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONAIRE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT (18" HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 STAGE (2' HT) 0 FF $40.00 $O.00 $O 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS 0 EA $450.00 $0.00 $O SITE LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 0 EA $300,00 $0.00 $0 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE - CONC. W/ SANDSTONE CAP (18-HT) DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL 0 FF $30.00 $0.00 $0 SANDSTONE CAP 0 SF $40.00 $0.00 $O 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $100,000.00 So.00 So 1 Phase Ill 28 4' INSIDE DIA. FIRE PIT WITH 24" WIDE SEAT WALL 0 LS $20,000.00 $0.00 $0 29 NEW PLANTER CURB 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 .$0 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 270 LF $18.00 $4,860.00 $4,860 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 1 EA $85000 $850.00 $850 33 CONCRETE STEPS - STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER 43 LF $3000 $1,29000 $1,290 34 STEP HANDRAILS (AT MAIN STAIRS) 20 LF $125.00 $2,500.00 $2,500 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS (AT MAIN STAIRS) 24 LF $10000 $2,400.00 $2,400 36 6" CONCRETE PAVING (PARK SIDE OF FESTIVAL PROMANADE -1.925 SF , $5.25 $10,106.25 $10,106 37 6" CONCRETE PAVING WITH SANDSTONE INSETS (DIAGONAL WALK) 0 SF $8.50 $0.00 10 38 6'â€¢ TINTED / SCORED CONCRETE PAVING (SOUTH PARKING BAYS ON PARK LANE) 2.575 SF $8.00 $20 60000 $20600 39 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING (FESTIVAL PROMANADE AREA ONLY 2,100 SF $14.00 $29,400.00 $29,400 40 SANDSTONE PAVING 0 SF $30.00 $0.00 $0 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,200.00 $0.00 $0 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE 0 EA $1,000.00 $0,00 $0 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE] 0 EA $1,200.00 $0.00 $0 ' 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 0 EA $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDRENÂ·S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE 0 SF $18.00 $000 $0 47 REINSTALL ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 $0 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS (+A 7' DIA) 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 $0 MEDIUM PLANTERS (+/- 5' DIA) 0 EA $1,000.00 $0.00 $0 SMALL PLANTERS (+/- 2.5' DIA) 0 EA $650.00 $0.00 $0 49 EVENT TENT TIE-DOWNS 0 EA $100.00 $0.00 $0 50 TREE GRATES (DOES NOT INCLUDE TREE GUARDS) 7 EA. $1,400.00 69.800.00 $9,800 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACEE 11 - EA $1,200.00 $13.200.00 $13,200 52 AMENDED / SUB DRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND / SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' O.C. 0 SF $3.50 $0.00 $0 FINE GRADING 0 SF $0.10 $0.00 $0 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOD BLEND 0 SF $1.00 $0.00 $0 54 2.5" SHADE TREES . 7 EA $375.00 $2,625.00 $2,625 i 55 2" AND 8Â· CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 4 EA $350.00 $1,400.00 $1.400 56 8Â· EVERGREEN TREES 2 - EA $400.00 $800.00 $800 57 10Â· EVERGREEN TREES r 2 EA $50000 $1.000.00 $1,000 58 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE 35 EA $30.00 $1,050.00 $1,050 , 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE 25 EA $35.00 $875.00 $875 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE 10 EA $38.00 $380.00 $380 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE' 10 EA $40.00 $400.00 $400 62 1 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS {ALLOWANCE 4 0 EA $15.00 $0.00 $0 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC 2,750 SF $1.25 $3,437.50 $3.438 64 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWN'S SCADA SYSTEM) 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 $0 IRRIGATION - TREES IN TREE GRATES 7 SE $150.00 $1.050.00 $1,050 IRRIGATION - BLUEGRASS TURF AREAS 0 SFÂ· $0.85 $0.00 $0 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 2750 SF $1.25 $3,437.50 $3.438 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGNS - 0 EA $6,too 00 $0.00 $0 66 RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE 1 EA $400.00 $400.00 $400 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMF 0 EA $5.60000 $000 $0 68 GAS LINE TO FIRE PIT (INCLUDING ASPHALT PATCH ALLOWANCE1 0 LF $40,00 $0.00 $0 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $12,000.00 $0.00 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SITE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 2 Phase 111 RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 EA $0.00 $O.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING: UP-LIGHTING, WATER FEATURE LIGHTING. ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $15,000.00 $0.00 POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $4,000.00 $0.00 RESET EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500,00 $4,500 BID ITEM TOTAL (Without GC'8, insurance, Bonds, Fees and Mobilization) $168,660 SUBTOTAL Wl Gas, INSURANCE, BONDS, FEES, AND MOBILIZATION $188,899 Estimating Contingency (14%) 14.00 % $26,446 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT GRAND TOTAL $215,345 COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Construction Contingency (9.5%) 1 LS $20,458 Desiln Fee Allowance (9.5%) 1 LS $20.458 Materials Test,ng During Construction 1 LS $3,000 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Electrical / Gas Fees 1 LS $0 Printing Bid Sets 1 LS $500 PROJECT TOTAL WITHALL COSTS â€¢ TT - $259,760 3 Phase 111 PHASE IV: PARK AREA, ELKHORN AVE IMPROVEMENTS & LANDSCAPING - OPINION OF PRO 3ABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Dec-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Hom Engineering / Architectural Engineering Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design ' COST PER COST PER SUB- QUANTITY UNIT UNIT ITEM TOTAL 1 GENERAL CONDITtONS, BONDS, INSURANCE AND FEES (5% 1 LS $14,054.88 $14,054.88 $14.055 a. MOBILIZATION AND TEMPORARY FACILITIES (5%) 1 LS $14,064.88 $14,054.88 $14,055 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000 4 CUT AND CAP EXISTING UTILITY LINES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILITY PROVIDER) 0 LS $0.00 $0,00 5 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLmON/CLEARING AND GRUBBING MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.51 AC $3.000.00 $1.515.15 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVE I RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS, ETC) 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 REMOVE TURF 21,700 SF $1.00 $21,700.00 TREE REMOVAL 3 EA $300.00 $90000 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING Â· 0 SY $6.50 $0.00 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING 0 SY $12.00 $0.00 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $6.00 $0.00 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS 156 SY $5.50 $858.00 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING 270 SF $10.00 $2,700,00 DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $7 500.00 $7,500.00 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER / CONCRETE STEPS 0 LS $500.00 $0.00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR - NORTHEAST PLANTER) 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 DEMO / SALVAGE SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL BOXES 5 EA $550.00 $2,750.00 DEMO, SALVAGE, OR MOVE MISC. UTILITY APPURTANCES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $1,500.00 $1.500.00 RELOCATE AND STORE/PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,500.00 $0.00 PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN . 3 EA $500.00 $1.500.00 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP, D. FTN., SITE FURN., HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $46.423 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL (+1- 6" DEPTH OVER 0.50 ACI 201 CY $6.00 $1,205.56 $1,206 8 EARTHWORK CUT (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0 5 ACRE PHASE IV (ALLOWANCE) 807 CY $6.00 $4,840.00 FILL (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.5 ACRE PHASE IV (ALLOWANCE) 807 CY $6.00 $4840.00 IMPORTED/EXPORTED FILL {ALLOWANCE) 75 CY $25.00 $1,875.00 $11,555 9 MISC. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE (SIDEWALK CHASES, ETC 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $000 $0 11 3/4" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 100 LF $35.00 $3,500.00 $3,500 12 2" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 50 LF $45,00 $2,250.00 $2,250 13 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY - EXISTING LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCEI 1 LS $3 000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (+1- 325 LF AT 2' WIDTH) 0 TON $165.00 $0.00 $0 17 3'CONCRETE PAN AT NORâ„¢ EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 $0 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE 0 LS $1,500 00 $0.00 $0 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) 0 SF $75.00 $0,00 $0 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20Â·x30') 0 SF $100.00 $0400 $0 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER (SEMI-CUSTOM) 0 Â· SF $80.00 $000 $0 22 SKATE RENTAL / HOT CHOCOLATE / CHILLER BUILDING (10'x16'1 0 SF $200.00 $0.00 $0 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONAIRE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT {18 HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 STAGE (2' HT) - 0 FF $4000 $0.00 $0 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS Â· 0 EA $450.00 $0.00 $0 SITE LANDSCAPE BOOLDERS 23 EA $300,00 $6.900.00 $8,900 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE - CONC. W/ SANDSTONE CAP (18"HT I DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL 813 FP $30.00 $24,375,00 $24,375 SANDSTONE CAP 250 SF $40.00 $10.000.00 $10,000 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $100 000400 $0.00 $0 t 1 Â· Phase IV 28 4' INSIDE DIA. FIRE PIT WITH 24"WIDE SEATWALL 0 LS $20000 00 $0.00 $0 29 NEW PLANTER CURB 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 165 LF $30.00 $4.950.00 $4.950 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $18.00 $0.00 $0 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 0 EA $850.00 $0.00 $0 33 CONCRETE STEPS STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 34 STEP HANDRAILS 0 LF $125.00 $0.00 $0 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS 0 LF $100.00 $0.00 $0 36 6" CONCRETE PAVING 0 SF $5.25 $0.00 $0 37 6-CONCRETE PAVING WITH SANDSTONE INSETS (DIAGONAL WALK) 1354 SF $8,50 $11,509 00 $11,509 38 6" TINTED / SCORED CONCRETE PAVING 0 SF $8.00 $0.00 $0 39 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING 0 SF $14.00 $0.00 $0 40 SANDSTONE PAVING 0 SF $30.00 $0.00 $0 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,200.00 $0.00 $0 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE 0 EA $1.000.00 $0.00 So 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,200.00 $000 $0 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 0 EA $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDREN'S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE 0 SF $18.00 $0.00 $0 47 REINSTALL ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 $0 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS (+A 7 DIA) 0 EA $1,50000 $0.00 $0 MEDIUM PLANTERS (+/- 5' DIA) 0 EA $1,000.00 $0.00 $0 SMALL PLANTERS (+/- 2 5Â· DIA) 0 EA $650.00 $0.00 $0 49 EVENT TENT nE-DOWNS 0 EA $100.00 $0400 $0 50 TREE GRATES (DOES NOT INCLUDE TREE GUARDS) 0 EA $1.400.00 $0.00 $0 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACEE 0 EA $1,200.00 $0,00 $0 52 AMENDED / SUB DRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND / SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' O C. 16,594 SF $3.50 $58079.00 $58 079 FINE GRADING 16,594 SF $0.10 $1,659.40 $1.659 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOO BLEND 16.594 SF $1.00 $16,594 00 $16,594 54 2.5" SHADE TREES 12 EA $37500 $4,500,00 $4,500 55 2-AND 8'CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 2 EA $350,00 $700.00 $700 56 8' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $400,00 $0.00 $0 57 10' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $500.00 $0.00 $0 58 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE, 95 EA $30.00 $2850.00 $2.850 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE+, 10 EA $35.00 $350 00 $350 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE 10 EA $38.00 $380.00 $380 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE cio EA $40.00 $2,400.00 $2,400 62 1 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS (ALLOWANCE 250 EA $15.00 $3,750.00 $3,750 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC 2,425 SF $1.25 $3.031.25 $3,031 64 IRRIGAnON SYSTEM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWN'S SCADA SYSTEM) 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000 IRRIGATION - TREES IN TREE GRATES 0 SF $150.00 $0.00 $0 IRRIGATION - BLUEGRASS TURF AREAS 16.594 SF $0.85 $14,104.90 $14,105 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 2,425 SF $1.25 $3,031.25 $3,031 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGN 1 EA $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000 66 RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE 1 EA $400.00 $400.00 $400 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMF 1 EA $5.600.00 $5,600.00 - $5.600 68 GAS LINE TO FIRE PIT (INCLUDING ASPHALT PATCH ALLOWANCE 0 LF $40.00 $0.00 $0 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $12,000.00 $0.00 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SITE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $12,000.00 $12,00000 2 Phase IV RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING: UP-LIGHTING, WATER FEATURE LIGHTING. ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $15,000.00 $0.00 POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $4,000.00 $0.00 RESET EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES 4 EA $1.500.00 $6.000.00 $18.000 BID ITEM TOTAL (Without GC's, Insurance. Bonds, Fees and Mobilization) $281,098 SUBTOTAL W/ GC's, INSURANCE, BONDS, FEES, AND MOBILIZATION $309,207 Estimating Contingency (11%) 11.00 % $34,013 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT GRAND TOTAL $343,220 COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1 LS $30.890 Construction Contingency (9%) Deskin Fee Allowance (8.5%) 1 LS $29.174 Materials Testing During Cons.din 1 LS $2,000 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Electrical / Gas Fees 1 LS $0 Printing Bid Sets 1 LS $500 PROJECTTOTALWITHALLCOSTS $405,784 , 4. 3 Phase IV PHASE V. FIRE PIT AREA, STAGE. CHILDREN'S CLIMBING SCLPT.,AND SW /SE & ELKHORN AVE PLAZAE - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Dec-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Hom Engineering / Architectural Engineering Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design COST PER COST PER SUB- QUANTITY UNIT UNIT ITEM TOTAL 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS, INSURANCE AND FEES (5%) 1 LS $12,092.30 $12,092.30 $12,092 a. MOBILIZATION AND TEMPORARY FACILITIES (5%) 1 LS $12,092.30 $12,092.30 $12,092 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000,00 $4,000 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 4 CUT AND CAP EXISTING UTILITY LINES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 $500 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILITY PROVIDER) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 5 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION/CLEARING AND GRUBBING MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.15 AC $3,000,00 $450.00 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVE / RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS, ETC) 0 LS $2,500,00 $0.00 REMOVE TURF 0 SF $1.00 $0.00 TREE REMOVAL 0 EA $300.00 $0.00 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING (PARKING ALONG PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR) 0 SY $6.50 $0.00 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING (PERIMETER WALK, TURN ISLAND ON MACGREGOR AND AT POLICE CORNER) 0 SY $12.00 $0,00 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $6.00 $0,00 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS 0 SY $550 $0.00 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING 0 SF $10.00 $0.00 DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 0 LS $3,000.00 $000 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $7,500.00 $0400 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER / CONCRETE STEPS 0 LS $500.00 $0.00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR - NORTHEAST PLANTER) 25 LF $15.00 $375.00 DEMO / SALVAGE SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL BOXES 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 DEMO, SALVAGE, OR MOVE MISC. UTILITY APPURTANCES (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $3,500.00 $0,00 RELOCATE AND STORE/PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,500.00 $0.00 PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN . 4 EA $500.00 $2,000.00 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP, D. FTN., SITE FURN., HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $2,825 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $000 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL (+/- 6- DEPTH OVER 0.90 AC) 0 CY $6.00 $0.00 $0 8 EARTHWORK CUT (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.9 ACRE SITE (ALLOWANCE) 0 CY $6.00 $0.00 FILL (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.9 ACRE SITE (ALLOWANCE) 0 CY $6.00 $0.00 IMPORTED/EXPORTED FILL (ALLOWANCE) 15 CY $25.00 $375.00 $375 9 .MISC. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE (SIDEWALK CHASES, ETC) 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 11 3/4-TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 $0 12 2- TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $45.00 $0.00 $0 13 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY - EXISTING LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 $0 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (+1- 325 LF AT r WIDTH) 0 TON $165.00 $0.00 $0 17 3' CONCRETE PAN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 . $0 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $1,500.00 $0.00 30 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) 0 SF $75.00 $0.00 $0 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20'x301 0 SF $100.00 $0.00 $0 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER {SEMI-CUSTOM) 1.000 SF $80.00 $80,000.00 $80,000 22 SKATE RENTAL / HOT CHOCOLATE / CHILLER BUILDING (10,167 0 SF $200.00 $0.00 $0 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONAIRE) 0 EA $0.00 $000 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT (18- HT) . 166 FF $40.00 $6,640.00 $6,640 STAGE (2' HT) 93 FF $40.00 $3,700.00 $3,700 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS (AT EU<HORN AVENUE SEATING PLAZA) 7 EA $450.00 $3,150.00 $3,150 SITE LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 0 EA $300.00 $0.00 so 1 Phase V 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE-CONC. W/ SANDSTONE CAP (18"HT) DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL 0 FF - $30.00 $0.00 $0 SANDSTONE CAP 0 SF $40.00 $0.00 $0 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $100000.00 $0.00 $0 28 4'INSIDE DIA. FIRE PIT WITH 24"WIDE SEAT WALL 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000 29 NEW PLANTER CURB (DETAILED TO MATCH EXT. PLANTERS @ ELKHORN & MACGREGOR) 65 LF $30.00 $1,950.00 $1,950 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $18.00 $0.00 $0 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 0 EA $850.00 $0.00 $0 33 CONCRETE STEPS STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 40 LF $30.00 $1,200.00 $1,200 ~ MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 34 STEP HANDRAILS (AT STAGE) 25 LF $125.00 $3,125.00 $3,125 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS Â· 0 LF $100.00 $0400 $0 36 6- CONCRETE PAVING (STAGE) 500 SF $5.25 $2,625.00 $2,625 37 6- CONCRETE PAVING WITH SANDSTONE INSETS pIAGONAL WALK) 0 SF $8.50 $0.00 $0 38 6- TINTED /SCORED CONCRETE PAVING 0 SP $8.00 $0.00 $0 39 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING (AT SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ENTRIES) 2,574 SF $14.00 $36,036.00 $36,036 40 SANDSTONE PAVING (AT ELKHORN AVENUE SEATING AREA & SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST ENTRY PLAZAS) 954 SF $30.00 $28,620.00 $28,620 , 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 3 EA $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $3,600 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE) 3 EA $1.000.00 $3,000,00 $3,000 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE) 4 EA $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $4,800 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDRENÂ·S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5.000 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE 225 SF $18.00 $4,050.00 $4,050 47 REINSTALL ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0.00 30 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS (+/- 7' DIA) 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500 MEDIUM PLANTERS (44- 5' DIA) 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000 SMALL PLANTERS (44- 2.5' DIA) 1 EA $650.00 $650.00 $650 49 EVENT TENT TIE-DOWNS 0 EA $100,00 $0.00 $0 50 TREE GRATES (DOES NOT INCLUDE TREE GUARDS) 0 EA $1,400.00 $0.00 30 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACES 0 EA $1,200.00 $0.00 $0 52 AMENDED / SUB DRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND / SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' O.C. 0 SF $3.50 $0.00 $0 FINE GRADING 0 SF $0.10 $0.00 $0 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOD BLEND 0 SF $1.00 $0,00 $0 54 2.5" SHADE TREES T 0 EA $375.00 $0.00 30 55 2" AND 8' CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 0 EA $350.00 $0.00 30 56 8' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 $0 57 10' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $500.00 $0.00 $0 58 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $30.00 $0.00 $0 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $35.00 $0.00 $0 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $38.00 $0.00 $0 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $40.00 $0.00 $0 . 62 1 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $15.00 $0.00 30 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC 0 SF $1.25 $0.00 30 64 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWN'S SCADA SYSTEM) 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 $5,000 IRRIGATION - TREES IN TREE GRATES 0 SF $150.00 $0.00 $0 2 Phase V 'r IRRIGATION - BLUEGRASS TURF AREAS 0 SF $0.85 $0,00 $0 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 0 SF $125 $0.00 $0 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGNS 1 EA 56.000.00 $6.000.00 $6,000 66 RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 Â· $0 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMP 0 EA $5,600.00 $0.00 $0 68 GAS LINE TO FIRE PIT (INCLUDING ASPHALT PATCH ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $40,00 $0.00 $0 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $12,000.00 $0.00 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SITE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS 32,000.00 $2,000.00 RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING- UP-LIGHTING, WATER FEATURE LIGHTING, ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $15.000.00 $0.00 POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS 54.000.00 $4,000.00 RESET EXtSTING LIGHT FIXTURES 0 EA $1.500.00 $0.00 $6,000 BID ITEM TOTAL (Without GC's, Insurance, Bonds, Fees and Mobilization) $241,846 SUBTOTAL W/ GC's. INSURANCE. BONDS, FEES. AND MOBILIZATION $266,031 Estimating Conungency (12%) 12.00 % $31,924 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT GRAND TOTAL $297,954 COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Construction Contjngency (9%) 1 LS $26,816 Design Fee Allowance (8.75%} . 1 LS $26,071 Materials Testing During Construction 1 LS $2,000 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Electrical / Gas Fees 1 LS $0 Prinlinq Bid Sets 1 LS $500 PROJECT TOTAL WITH ALL COSTS $353,341 3 Phase V 4 PHASE VI: REMAINING STRUC'I'URES AND WATER FEATURE - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado h 30~Dec-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Hom Engineering / Architectural Engineering Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design 4 - COST PER COST PER SUB- QUANTITY UNIT UNIT ITEM TOTAL ~ 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS, INSURANCE AND FEES (5%) 1 LS $11,927.50 $11,927.50 $11,928 a. MOBILIZATION AND TEMPORARY FACILITIES (5%) 1 LS $11,927.50 $11,927,50 $11,928 2 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500 . 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL 0 q LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 4 CUT AND CAP EXISTING UTILITY LINES (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $50000 $500.00 $500 UPDATE UTILITIES IN MACGREGOR AVENUE (FROM OTHER TOWN BUDGETS OR BY UTILITY PROVIDER) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 5 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOUTION/CLEARING AND GRUBBING MISCELLANEOUS CLEARING & GRUBBING 0.10 AC $3,000.00 $300.00 MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS (REMOVE / RESET SIGNS, DOG STATIONS, ETC) 0 LS $2,500.00 $0.00 REMOVE TURF 0 SF $1 00 $0.00 TREE REMOVAL 0 EA $300.00 $0.00 DEMO / SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVING (PARKING ALONG PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR) 0 SY $6.50 $0.00 DEMO CONCRETE PAVING (PERIMETER WALK, TURN ISLAND ON MACGREGOR AND AT POLICE CORNER) 0 SY $12,00 $0,00 DEMO CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $6.00 $0.00 DEMO CRUSHER FINE WALKS 0 SY $5.50 $0.00 DEMO FIRE PIT / SALVAGE FLAGSTONE PAVING Â· 0 SF $10.00 $0.00 DEMO BOULDER WATER FEATURE 0 LS $3,000.00 $0.00 DEMO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS BURIED UNDER TURF (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $7,500.00 $0.00 DEMO TIMBER RETAINING WALLS 0 LF $35.00 $0.00 DEMO TtMBER / CONCRETE STEPS 0 LS $500.00 $0,00 DEMO EXISTING PLANTER CURB (ELKHORN & MACGREGOR - NORTHEAST PLANTER) 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 DEMO / SALVAGE SITE LIGHTING AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL BOXES Â· 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 DEMO, SALVAGE, OR MOVE MISC, UTILITY APPURTANCES (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $3,500.00 $0.00 RELOCATE AND STORE/PROTECT ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2,500,00 $0.00 PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN - 0 EA $500.00 $0.00 RELOCATE EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SOUTH OF PARK LANE 0 LS $2,000.00 $0400 SALVAGE IRRIG. EQUIP, D. FTN., SITE FURN., HISTORIC MONUMENTS (BY TOWN STAFF) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $300 6 RELOCATE INFORMATION CABIN, PAYMENT BOX (BY TOWN STAFF - SITES TO BE DETERMINED) 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 7 STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RESPREAD ON-SITE TOPSOIL (+/- 6" DEPTH OVER 0.90 AC) 0 CY $6.00 $0.00 $0 8 EARTHWORK , CUT (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.9 ACRE SITE (ALLOWANCE) 0 CY $&00 $0.00 FILL (ALLOWANCE): 1 FOOT AVG ACROSS 0.9 ACRE SITE (ALLOWANCE) 0 CY $6.00 $000 IMPORTED/EXPORTED FILL (ALLOWANCE) 10 CY $25.00 $250,00 $250 9 MISC. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ALLOWANCE (SIDEWALK CHASES, ETC) 0 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500 10 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (NOT REQUIRED FOR BOND PARK) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 11 3/4" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $3500 $0.00 $0 12 2" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $45.00 $0.00 $0 13 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY - EXISTING LEFT IN PLACE 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 14 METER AND METER PIT, GATE VALVES, AND CURB STOPS (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 LS $0.00 $0.00 $0 15 WATER LINE CONNECTIONS (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS 33.000,00 $0.00 30 16 ASPHALT PATCH BACK AT NEW PAVING (+1- 325 LF AT 2' WIDTH) 0 .TON $16500 $000 $0 17 3Â· CONCRETE PAN AT NORTH EDGE OF PARK LANE PARKING SPACES 0 LF $15.00 $0.00 $0 18 TRAFFIC AND HANDICAP SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $1,500.00 $0.00 $0 19 FABRIC STAGE COVER (SEASONAL) 300 SF $75,00 $22,500.00 $22,500 20 TIMBER GATEWAY SHELTER (20'*30') 600 SF $100.00 $60.000.00 $60000 21 TIMBER FIRE PIT SHELTER (SEMI-CUSTOM) 0 SF $80.00 $0.00 $0 22 SKATE RENTAL / HOT CHOCOLATE / CHILLER BUILDING (10'1161 160 SF $200.00 $32000.00 $32000 23 SEASONAL ICE RINK (PROVIDED BY CONCESSIONAIRE) Â· 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 24 LANDSCAPE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS WALLS AT FIRE PIT (18- HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 STAGE (2' HT) 0 FF $40.00 $0.00 $0 25 SANDSTONE SEAT BOULDERS AND LANDSCAPE BOULDERS SEAT BOULDERS 0 EA $450.00 $0.00 $0 SITE LANDSCAPE BOULDERS 0 EA $30000 $0.00 $0 1 Phase VI 26 SEAT WALL ALONG ELKHORN AVE - CONC. Wi SANDSTONE CAP (18"HT ) DECORATIVE CONCRETE STEM WALL 0 FF $30.00 $0.00 $0 SANDSTONE CAP 0 SF $40.00 $0.00 $0 27 WATER FEATURE AT STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000 28 4'INSIDE DIA. FIRE PITWITH 24"WIDE SEAT WALL 0 LS $20.000.00 $000 $0 29 NEW PLANTER CURB 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $O 30 SANDSTONE PLANTER CURB BETWEEN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 31 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 LF $18.00 $0.00 so 32 CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMPS 0 EA $850.00 $0.00 $0 33 CONCRETE STEPS STAGE STAIRS (2 SETS) 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 MAIN STAIRS AT NORTHWEST CORNER 0 LF $30.00 $0.00 $0 34 STEP HANDRAILS 0 LF $125.00 $0.00 $0 35 CONCRETE STEP STEM WALLS 0 LF $100.00 $0.00 $0 36 6" CONCRETE PAVING ( 0 SF $5.25 $0.00 $0 37 6-CONCRETE PAVING WITH SANDSTONE INSETS pIAGONAL WALK) 0 SF $8.50 $0.00 $0 38 6" TINTED / SCORED CONCRETE PAVING 0 SF $8.00 $0.00 $0 39 CONCRETE UNIT PAVING 0 SF $14.00 $0.00 $0 40 SANDSTONE PAVING 0 SF $30.00 $0.00 $0 41 TRASH RECEPTACLES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,200.00 $0,00 $0 42 BIKE RACKS (EXCLUDING CONC. SLAB) (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1,000.00 $0.00 $0 43 PARK BENCHES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $1.20000 $000 $0 44 CUSTOM BENCH (UNDER EXISTING COTTONWOODS) 0 EA $5,00000 $0.00 $0 45 PICNIC TABLES (RE-USE EXISTING) 0 EA $0.00 $0.00 $0 46 CHILDREN'S CLIMBING SCULPTURE SCULPTURE(ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $5,000.00 $0.00 $0 RESILIENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE SUBBASE 0 SF $1800 $0.00 $0 47 REINSTALL ENOS MILLS STATUE 0 LS $2.000.00 $0.00 $0 48 MOVABLE PLANTERS LARGE PLANTERS (+A 7' DIA) 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 $0 MEDIUM PLANTERS (+/- 5' DIA) 0 EA $1,000.00 $0.00 $0 SMALL PLANTERS (+/- 25' DIA) 0 EA $650.00 $0.00 $0 49 EVENT TENT TIE-DOWNS 0 EA $100.00 $0.00 $0 50 TREE GRATES (DOES NOT INCLUDE TREE GUARDS) 0 EA $1,400.00 $0.00 so 51 BOLLARDS TO DEFINE PARK LANE AND MACGREGOR STREET PARKING SPACES 0 EA $1,200.00 $0,00 $0 52 AMENDED/ SUBDRAINED TURF SYSTEM AMEND EXT. SOILS W/ SAND / SOIL AMENDMENTS & ADD SUBDRAINS @ 12' O.C. 0 SF $3.50 $0,00 $0 , FINE GRADING 0 SF $0.10 $000 $0 53 HIGH ACTIVITY SOD BLEND . 0 SF $1.00 $0.00 $0 54 2.5"SHADE TREES 0 EA $375.00 $0.00 $0 55 2-AND S' CLUMP ORNAMENTAL TREES 0 EA $35000 $0.00 $0 56 8'EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 $0 , 57 10' EVERGREEN TREES 0 EA $500.00 $000 $0 58 5 GALLON DECIDUOUS SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $30.00 $0,00 $0 59 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $35.00 $0.00 $0 60 5 GALLON BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUBS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $38.00 $0.00 $0 61 5 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $40 00 $0.00 $0 62 1 GALLON ORNAMENTAL GRASSES / PERENNIALS (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $15.00 $0.00 $0 63 SHRUB BED MULCH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC 0 SF $1.25 $0.00 $0 64 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION CONTROLLER COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TO TOWN'S SCADA SYSTEM) 0 LS $3.000.00 $0400 $5,000 IRRIGATION - TREES IN TREE GRATES 0 SF $15000 $0.00 $0 2 Phase VI IRRIGATION - BLUEGRASS TURF AREAS 0 SF $0.85 $0.00 $0 IRRIGATION - SHRUB BEDS 0 SF $1.25 $0.00 $0 65 PARK MONUMENT SIGNS Â· 0 EA $6,000.00 $0.00 $0 66 RULES AND REGULATIONS SIGNAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 EA $400.00 $0.00 $0 67 FREESTANDING DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH GRAVEL SUMP 0 EA $5,600.00 $0.00 $0 68 GAS LINE TO FIRE PIT (INCLUDING ASPHALT PATCH ALLOWANCE) 0 LF $40.00 $0.00 $0 69 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM PRIMARY AND TRANSFORMER (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $12,000.00 $0.00 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR SITE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $25,000.00 $0.00 RECEPTACLES FOR EVENT TENTS (INCLUDED IN COST OF BOLLARD) 0 Â· EA $0.00 $O.00 SPECIALTY LIGHTING: UP-LIGHTING, WATER FEATURE LIGHTING, ETC. (ALLOWANCE) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 POWER TO STAGE (ALLOWANCE) 0 LS $4,000.00 $0.00 RESET EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES Â· 0 EA $1,500.00 $0.00 $15,000 BID ITEM TOTAL (Without GC's, Insurance, Bonds, Fees and Mobilization) $238,550 SUBTOTAL W/ GC's, INSURANCE, BONDS, FEES, AND MOBILIZATION $262,405 Estimating Contingency (12%) 12.00 % $31,489 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT GRAND TOTAL $293,894 COSTS OUT SIDE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1 LS $26,450 Construction Contingency (9%) Design Fee Allowance (8.75%) 1 LS $25,716 Materials Testing During Construction 1 LS $2,000 Water Tap / Plant Investment Fees 1 LS $0 Electrical / Gas Fees Â· 1 LS $0 Printing Bid Sets 1 LS $500 PROJECT TOTAL WITH ALL COSTS $348,560 . 3 Phase VI PHASE SUMMARY - OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Bond Park Master Plan Cost Estimate Town of Estes Park, Colorado 30-Dec-09 Winston Associates, Inc. / Van Horn Engineering / Architectural Engineerirg Design Group / Avocet Irrigation Design PHASEI $391,672 PHASEI $326,211 PHASE 111 $259,760 PHASEIV $405,784 PHASE V $353,341 PHASE VI $348,560 Phase Construction Total $2,085,327 1 Phase Summary DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PHASED CONSTRUCTION 0 BOND PARK MASTER PLAN Town of Estes Park lMU January 2010 Because the renovation of Bond Park will require phased construction, it is essential each new phase of construction be consistent with previous phases. The following design guidelines are intended to provide guidance for detailed design and a framework for the park's critical elements as they develop over time. It should be noted that master plan level design is, by necessity, general in nature and should not be looked at as the final design solutions for critical site elements. The design treatments shown in the approved Master Plan are not intended to replace those which will evolve out of the more rigorous design process inherent with detailed construction documents. Therefore, the following guidelines should be viewed as a framework for more detailed design studies and not a mandate. All future detailed design work for Bond Park should comply with the applicable codes and design standards as well as the Estes Valley Development Code. The Design Features of the Approved Master Plan: . - â€¢ Festival Promenade: Enhanced concrete paving forthe south Park Lane parking spaces, modular unit paving for the event tent locations. No curb and gutter on pedestrian side & - and bollards to define parking. ~* ~~ â€¢ Ma(Gregor Avenue. Enhanced concrete paving with no ~ 1 \. curb and gutter and bollards to define parking. RE-*dir' 7 KIEEF ~g~b I The Northeast Plaza: A main field of modular pavers .l id~AZq,3-E:~,.44# ~ip-- surrounded by an accent band of natural sandstone. E =. 1 : eLF.2/9% â€¢ The Elkhorn Avenue Frontage: A curving natural stone I-- t*...1/*.b-#I; ~d#Mul / seatwall, shrub/perennial beds, and natural stone seating Plaza. 4 â€¢ Southwest and Southeast Entry Plazas: Modular unit paving with natural stone margins and accent areas 1 0/ IA â€¢ Northwest Stage: Raised concrete stage faced with natural stone boulders and covered with removable fabric stage , D cover. â€¢ Northwest Water Feature: Natural stone re-circulating water feature with a 3' to 4' waterfall and small ponds. Water to be treated to allow human contact. â€¢ Fire Pit Area. Commercial-grade gas fire pit surrounded by â‚¬* a natural stone seat wall surrounded by a two-tiered natural stone seating ring. Children's Play Sculpture. Low custom play sculpture within 0' 1! an area of resilient surfacing. All elements to meet current play equipment safety guidelines. 42 J.F. -7 . Bond Park Master Plan 1 Design Guidelines PARK STRUCTURES. The structures for the Bond Park should be compatible with Town Hall and the architectural themes found in Downtown Estes Park and nearby Rocky Mountain National Park. All of the structures in Bond Park should utilize the same materials, colors and, architectural details where possible. The Approved Master Plan shows three structures within the park: â€¢ Southwest Plaza Gateway 1.,glZlll*IEP"""1~-~~~~- u.Lyâ€ž iâ€¢ Â·j~' *4/ah. and Fire Pit Shelters: These ~ f/,wd-**~//I~,/APP ' structures are envisioned as a log shelters reminiscent of ..iti.79191= 31Â¢4 classic National Park Service ~Â· ' '8. i make use of natural "14.21.-t ~,29 ;.~,-~fi.'~-~* Â«.0 materials such as peeled log ~ 4- 1 -6 and stone with gently pitched roofs. (+/- 4/12) - o The Gateway Sheltershould be designed hIA to not to block views to Longs Peak. .pr 1--*-lilliA Left: o The Fire Pit Shelter concept calls for low .......-'.1 1 Stiggested eves on the west side to facilitate torm for screening from the west winds with = A ~ 1 Fire Pit higher eves on the east side to provide ~ Shelter views to the Northwest Plaza. Please note that the shelter image shown to the ~ right is intended to illustrate the potential ~ form for the Fire Pit Shelter and not materials. â€¢ The Ice Rink Mechanical Structure: This structure is envisioned as a small building that will be constructed if the ice rink becomes a permanent fixture in the park. The building should make use of ..............66./.-2.9/1 natural materials such as stone, wood, and peeled logs, similar to the ~. structure shown in the historic photo from Rocky Mountain National Park (right). LANDSCAPING. The landscape for Bond Park should make use of native or adapted low-water-use plant material. Plants should be selected from the Town's Preferred Planting List or other varieties approved by Town Staff. Deer-resistant varieties should be utilized where possible. U .4 -2=- J 1.- 1 7~-.1/0/illi:-7/I - Â· lE-~Â· -~ /'/%Nli_//I ./.p.miR,ellillillill.. â€¢ Beds along Elkhorn Avenue should emphasize colorful, flowering perennials and shrubs similarto the bed south of the bus drop offon the south side of Town Hall (above right). Bond Park Master Plan 2 Design Guidelines PAVING. Plazas and walkways in and - around the park will be one of the most visible elements -- and as such, ~ Ilill:MI'l:,6,2 should be carefully designed. Paving ~ cilill 0-7F:ZILF-m~ fl systems should be compatible with :-=dir---I"~4 11. 1~~~~ * ~~*rf -*4.-422 1 the designated use, durable, and - attractive. Detailed design studies looking atseveral pavingdesignsand ~-.-~7,-,<i4,ar5:*w - zy--: F / I I systems will be needed for each paved 1~. 32- area of the park to identify the @il- r-~i--i appropriate design solution. . re,/li'.3Â£4211&34*<:939. â€¢ Natural sandstone paving should ""vo , 184 r< -4 -1--- I....Ill,lill/"IN be used for plazas, accent areas, ./fil-I l. /$ _ . or accent bands where budget allows. There are a number of - examples of well designed ~4-/ \--'.Â». 'ab-r .33, /// INfi ... 8,4,1,1,&f.W - - I.I.E.I. i liatir - sandstone pavement systems in :. ' the downtown that can be used as a model (upper left). â€¢ Modular paving systems (clay or lillillillillillillill I; 1:/.I# 'milililli; ilifigi,i::::::::,09::mi:ill Â»124* concrete units) are encouraged for plazas or accent paving where Ililibi*-41- sandstone is too costly or . , :i- .- impractical. Blends consisting of ~ 17 t. 1/-j,-j.-. L ...3 at least three colors are strongly qj .p..,-.Ali,.w#14~-J ~~.~~-".._> 4-21-$6~ 3- encouraged. The paving patterns "-7. 'â€¢i'"4~"1*ri~-1- should be designed to not only be ~ u attractive but to designate uses areas such as pedestrian routes, parking areas, and event tent locations. Adequate contrast should be provided between colors to define uses or create patterns (middle photos and lower left.) One motif that is frequently found in Town Hall and the downtown is an elongated octagon with brick or concrete unit pavers (upper right). Because of Bond Park's proximity to Town Hall, this pattern has been shown in the entry plazas on the Master Plan. However other design solutions should be examined before a final decision is made. â€¢ Where budget does not allow natural stone or unit pavers, concrete that is integrally colored and stamped is appropriate (lower right). Patterns and contrasting colors should be used to define uses (e.g. striping for parking spaces on MacGregor and Park Lane). â€¢ Pavement systems within parking and roadways need to be engineered to withstand heavy vehicles such as a fire truck while plazas and pedestrian areas should be designed for medium-duty vehicles. Paving can be set on concrete, on an aggregate subbase, or a combination of the two with proper engineering. Porous paving systems (middle left) may also be appropriate for some areas of Bond Park and should be considered. â€¢ Additional detailed study is needed to determine the practicality and installation details for the permanent, in-ground event tent tie downs including how the tie downs would be incorporated into each pavement system. â€¢ Sidewalks at the edges of the park can be standard concrete with a section deep enough to withstand a medium-duty vehicle (+/- 6" thick). Bond Park Master Plan 3 Design Guidelines LIGHTING. The primary path light for Bond Park should be the same pedestrian- -/0.-~1- scale Victorian light fixtures currently used in the park and the downtown. â€¢ Lighting should be designed to provide the minimum levels of safe illumination for park users, while being unobtrusive and consistent with the ~ 4 current lighting levels in Downtown Estes Park. Recommended levels shall be ~ as set forth in the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Lighting Handbook- Ninth Edition. â€¢ Overall park lighting plan shall comply with any local lighting ordinances for lamp type, mounting, shielding, and lighting trespass requirements. â€¢ Except for path lighting, free-standing light fixtures should be avoided. Light - U.1 fixtures should be integrated into structures or walls where possible. â€¢ The lamps of each light fixture should be shielded to avoid visibility from normal viewing angles. â€¢ All new light fixtures should utilize energy-efficient lamp sources. â€¢ All light sources should be shielded to minimize illuminating the night sky (per the recommendations of the International Dark-Sky Association) â€¢ Any new lighting for elements such as the water feature, the ice rink, or art/statues, should be vandal resistant and carefully shielded to limit light trespass. Materials and finishes should be consistent the path lighting. â€¢ Because of cost, durability concerns, and the potential for vandalism, the Approved Master Plan does not call for the Festival Promenade bollards to include lights. If it is determined that these bollards should include light fixtures, a very durable/vandal-resistant fixture should be selected. SITE FURNISHINGS. A full range of site furnishings will be required for Bond Park. This includes benches, trash receptacles, bollards, picnic tables, and bike racks. Ideally, these should be specified as a family of elements with common materials, colors, and design motifs. However, the decision to select a distinctive group of site furnishing must be made with the input of Town's staff. It may be more cost effective and result in lower long-term maintenance costs if the Town's standard site furnishings for parks are used. If this proves to be the case, Bond Park's site furnishings should at least be the same color. â€¢ Bollards are called for to define the edges of the parking areas along MacGregor and Park Lane. Town staff has already stated that these should be Irelfimrizilifilr~~ concrete bollards because of the need for durability and to reduce long-term / I- 12 1~~ maintenance costs. Concrete bollards have another advantage as it should be *- ~ 9*''b j , 11 easier to incorporate electrical receptacles and electrical conduit into the ~ Â·En/1,Â·..-. / mold prior to casting the bollard. Electrical receptacles will be needed to provide power to the event tents. Bond Park Master Plan 4 Design Guidelines . 900 Wazee Street I Suite 255 1 Denver, Colorado 80202 1 303.296.3034 voice [ 303.296.3035 fax I www.aedesign-inc.com ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP. INC. ~ MASTER PLAN NARRATIVE BOND PARK ESTES PARK, COLORADO ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS February 1, 2010 MASTER PLAN NARRATIVE BOND PARK < ELECTRICAL OVERVIEW ESTES PARK, COLORADO I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is anticipated to consist o f a modification to an existing park bordered by Elkhorn Avenue to the south, Macgregor Avenue to the east. and Park Lane to the north and west. The new park design shall consist o f a rework o f the existing layout to provide the following amenities: New site wide hardscaping and landscaping, relocation of existing park lighting, localized plaza area with a shelter/tiered fire pit for use as a congregation area during warm months and as a temporary ice link during winter months, a chiller building to house utility services for the park as well as service the ice rink for chiller location and perhaps skate rental, a new stage area with adjacent water feature, and provisions for a 100 tent festival layout. II. ELECTRIC SYSTEMS OVERVIEW A. POWER DENSITY DESIGN CRITERIA AND LOAD SUMMARY The electrical density design criteria is based on estimated volt-amp per square foot allowances for interior lighting, exterior lighting, mechanical systems, kitchen equipment, and miscellaneous power systems. The estimates are based on historical data of similar project types. The anticipated electrical density load estimates are as follows: Load Tvpe System Sizing Load Ice Rink Chiller System 128 KVA (based typical single chiller temporary system) Interior Lighting Loads (Chiller Building) 2.0 VA/Sqft (Actual watts/sf of final lighting load is anticipated to be less than 2.0 w/sf. Energy efficient lighting is expected to be provided however, for preliminary electrical equipment sizing, 2.0 w/sf is an appropriate value.) Exterior Lighting Loads 0.2 VA/Sqft Water Feature Mechanical +/-5HP Bollard Receptacles @ Vendor Tents 100 KVA Stage Power 10 KVA Based on a the anticipated electrical loading as listed above, at a voltage of 208/120 volts, three phase, the service shall be 800 amps. B. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Page 2 of 5 February 2, 2010 MASTER PLAN NARRATIVE BOND PARK ELECTRICAL OVERVIEW ESTES PARK, COLORADO The new park electrical distribution system is intended to consist of a new site utility transformer located adjacent to the northwest plaza shelter. That transformer shall be fed from the existing 3-phase primary electrical vault located immediately to the north of Park Lane. The utility transformer shall feed a new exterior rated current transformer (CT) cabinet / meter / bussed gutter system to be located on the unistrut type system adjacent to the transformer. The transformer and service equipment exact locations shall be coordinated with the overall landscape plantings to minimize the visual impact on the site. A dedicated disconnect shall feed a new branch circuit panelboard, and a dedicated disconnect shall provide electrical connection capability for a temporary ice rink chiller system. The electrical service is to be provided from a new pad mounted utility transformer, primary and transformer by Estes Park Light and Power. The Contractor shall coordinate all installation requirements with the utility company. The Contractor is responsible for installation of the primary conduits, pad for utility furnished transformer, and conduit and wire on secondary side of transformer to the main distribution center. The ampacity and overall feeder distribution o f the electrical equipment will be revised as the design moves forward and the loads are better defined. Refer to attached one-line diagram for an illustration of the intended electrical distribution system at this Master Plan level. C. POWER SYSTEMS SUMMARY ~ At the Master Plan level, the following major power requirements shall be considered as part o f the new park project: 1. Vendor Tent Bollards: It is the intent of this Master Plan to provide localized power adjacent to the vendor tents throughout the park. Power shall be provided via receptacle devices with lockable covers integrated into the landscape bollards located adjacent to the tent areas. There will be two distinct vendor tent areas which shall receive different power receptacle configurations, and those areas shall be as follows: Twenty (20) bollards along the park side of Macgregor Avenue and Park Lane shall service food vendor area tents, and ten (10) bollards along the east side of Macgregor Avenue shall service non-food related vendor tents. a) Food Vendor Areas: Each bollard located at a food vendor area shall incorporate a 208V/1-phase receptacle, and a 120V/1-phase duplex receptacle. Both receptacles shall receive a dedicated circuit fed from the service panelboard, and shall be GFI type with a lockable weather-proo f cover. b) Non-Food Vendor Areas: Each bollard located at a non-food related vendor area shall incorporate a single 120V/1-phase four- plex receptacle. Each half of the four-plex receptacle shall receive Page 3 of 5 February 2, 2010 MASTER PLAN NARRATIVE BOND PARK ELECTRICAL OVERVIEW ESTES PARK, COLORADO a dedicated circuit fed from the service panelboard, and shall be GFI type with a lockable weather-proo f cover 2. Water Feature: It is anticipated that a +/-5HP pump shall service the site water feature. A dedicated 208V, 3-phase, 35A circuit shall be fed from the service panelboard. 3. Stage Power: Power to the stage area shall be provided via a combination of methods. A series of 120V/1-phase duplex receptacles shall be located about the perimeter of the stage area. Locations o f the receptacles shall be coordinated with actual design o f the stage area. Each receptacle shall receive a dedicated circuit fed from the service panelboard, and shall be GFI type with a lockable weather-proo f cover. Additional 208V/3-phase, 30A power shall be provided by a pin-sleeve mechanical interlock disconnect device as indicated on the electrical oneline diagram. The interlock device shall allow for larger power equipment to be connected at the stage area on a temporary basis as needed. 4. Ice Rink Chiller: Given the nature o f a temporary ice rink being installed by a party outside the scope o f this project, exact chiller specifications are not available. Therefore, based on a consultation with a potential temporary rink installer, the master plan assumed load was between 300A and 350A at 208V/3-phase. Per the attached electrical oneline diagram, it is intended that the temporary chiller associated with the seasonal ice rink shall be serviced by a dedicated 400A fused disconnect. 5. Chiller Building: Building general purpose power shall be designed as part of the design o f that building, and shall be fed from the service panelboard. D. LIGHTING SYSTEMS SUMMARY Currently at Bond Park there exists a series of (9) pedestrian scale area lighting standard. It is intent of this Master Plan to relocate & reuse those existing lighting standards as the primary lighting for the new park project. Additional lighting shall be added to the project to provide supplemental illumination across the park. 1. Existing Pedestrian Lighting Standards: As part of this project, the existing lighting standards on site shall be relocated to conform to the new park hardscaping / landscaping layouts. Luminaire spacing shall attempt to approximate the existing lighting standard spacing currently on site. 2. Entry Shelter Area: Illumination shall be provided at the entry shelter area via direct distribution type luminaires integrated into the shelter structure. Preferred method would be to utilize recessed downlighting that accents the vertical structure of the shelter. 3. Park Path Area: The path from the entry shelter back to the northeast corner fire pit plaza area shall be provided with supplemental illumination to match the illumination levels provided at the perimeter o f the site by the Page 4 of 5 February 2, 2010 MASTER PLAN NARRATIVE BOND PARK ELECTRICAL OVERVIEW ESTES PARK, COLORADO relocated existing pedestrian luminaires. This illumination shall be provided by pedestrian style area luminaires that attempt to match the design styling of the existing luminaires be relocated. 4. Fire Pit Area: The fire pit area is intended to have a tiered seating area that recesses down to the fire pit location. It would be desired to have low level illumination at this are that would accent the resulting changes in elevation. This illumination shall be provided using recessed low level step lighting integrated into the tiered construction. 5. Elkhorn Avenue Seating Plaza: At the seating plaza area, there is the potential for art/sculpture to be located adjacent to the low seating area. It would be desired to have this area provided with low level illumination integrated into the low height seat wall at the perimeter o f the plaza area. 6. Water Feature: A GFI protected 120V, 20A circuit shall be run to a junction box adjacent to the water feature for integrated water feature lighting to be designed in tandem with that feature. 7. Enos Mills Sculpture: A GFI protected 120V, 20A circuit shall be run to a junction box adjacent to the sculpture area for accent lighting upon the sculpture. The accent lighting shall accentuate the portion of the sculpture visible as one proceeds from the entry shelter towards at the southwest corner up to the northwest plaza. 8. Park Area Holiday Temporary Lighting: A minimum of (2) 120V, 20A circuits shall be run to a series of between 12 to 16 lockable weatherproof GFI type receptacles for temporary holiday lighting installation. These receptacles shall be located immediately adjacent to tress around the perimeter of the park site. Final locations shall be determined during design. Page 5 of 5 February 2, 2010 . Ameet IRRIGATION DESIGN MEMORANDUM To: Paul Kuhn - Winston Associates From: David Zickerman - Avocet Irrigation Design Date: February 1, 2010 Project: Estes Park Bond Park The current park is served via a single 2" tap/meter controlled with a radio-accessible Motorola Irrinet controller. Static water pressure is approximately 65 PSI. The irrigation backflow preventer and controller are located in close proximity to one another in the southeast corner of the park (McGregor & Elkhorn) Mainline piping is located at approximate three to four depth throughout the park. Through the years various manufacturers' and models of equipment has been installed through maintenance functions and modifications to the existing system to fit new conditions. Per the water budget and park flow chart (attached) the 2" tap is more than sufficient to irrigate the park within a water window of 4 days per week, eight hours per irrigation night (Chart indicates a peak required flow of 16 gpm. 2" tap capable of recommended 80 gpm under normal operating conditions). Due to the configuration of the backflow preventer, configuration and depth of existing backflow preventer enclosure, and depth of existing piping it is recommended that the tap, meter and backflow preventer remain in their current location. The Motorola Irrinet controller is considered an intermediate device which not only receives programming information from the main irrigation central control computer but also communicates to various, other off-site Motorola Scorpio units. Consideration must be given to the timing of any move pertaining to the Irrinet unit as it does have implications for other irrigated remote sites with Scorpio units depending on the Irrinet unit for its' irrigation scheduling. If the Irrinet controller is to be moved then 1) perform the move during an irrigation off season time of year, 2) minimize the down time as much as possible if the move occurs within the irrigation season. 120 volt, 2 amp power will need to be established for any new controller location. Due to the age, multitude of equipment and materials, and the new configuration of the park, it is recommended that the irrigation system be replaced in total. This will provide the Town with an updated irrigation system that will be more efficient with current technology equipment and will be installed to conform to the site's final new configuration. It is recommended that a traditional irrigation system consisting of overhead irrigation (pop-up spray heads/gear-driven rotors) be installed in turf areas and a water-conserving drip irrigation system be installed in new bed areas. Quick coupling valves installed in valve boxes, requiring a special key to operate, are suggested to be installed at regular intervals along the plaza edge to provide a water source for plaza cleaning purposes, These valves, being connected to the irrigation system, are considered to be non-potable water and, therefore, cannot serve as a source of potable water 1114 W JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITE 201 â€¢ LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80235 . 303.986.2175 â€¢ FAX: 303.989.5814 â€¢ E-MAIL: avocet@wispertel.net Assuming that the proposed water feature is to operate only during the irrigation season the irrigation system could supply the required water for an automated means of filling. Through the use of an electric valve(s) in combination with a twenty-four timer and float valve(s), the filling cycle could be programmed during non-irrigation periods of the day eliminating any use conflicts between water feature filling and irrigation system operation. t 0 *ird..0,4 O.0.000.0. ..'.... .'.1, r! f J - 0000000000 0 rE. Â·Â·Â· ir, 9 . Â·Â· iri - Â·-r Â· ,0 0000.00000 000.000 90 - â€¢Â·r Â· Â· ooddoodocid .000000 O 0 0 - <O - U, U ' .Â· . . F (\ILO..Nv-OJ ...009.U-1/ E 55393334% .horn/.al (N . 00 00 - .04<952 - nUÂ·>Ul I m -I O 66-add.520 00000006 1.- LU . 0 Z O LU 8. Em U- 0 0 0 <r k I 1 - CÂ£ 2 i 8 5 05 I 3! :*a 6.-0.(DI. 8/ '*ME*Gio ../.cle>-4 4// 90&99 2% W U,=I p.. 4 . / m m -â„¢Com.NO. OV-r.T--00 CO . p Z Z Z Z I - I - me :t mE U} 4= 4= :t# 2* EN 22 22 =a =8 =a =S 2 W 2: 2* 2: â‚¬ g 1- 1- % 22 0 0 Ul EM :M g &Aggdggg EM.~.5%&65 8&%55%5Â£% 5 00 INN.NIN .Lul -prr--re ..fr----r . LU v- V 3 . I - h - 1,10 . I N I . . I U-)0006004-> - 00 09(109/.(N,) O 4Â· I C-) r- * 00 4Â· C> et Cor . W . I . - ..â€ž:444*U ",_-Nme.NO . -- -O 52 0: Z0 1- 3Â§ %1 6 3 A . a. merle<'>Irl 0000000 00000.0 0000000 0000000 :: LU W O 6 GE :6 0 . 0 .0 .8 . -tole,NOCIN p...NOON r<00.-001Â·- p (D <q rl N 00 h NO'..mol- N: .2 .4 4 N=6n64- N 9 --- 4 -: . h I . <m <: 8: Of . 5*m . Â£= ad:e /2 2@mu 29 3259 En a <$ 7<00 <= n I I F : 0 00 . 9 /0 Ils 00 .U'> 00 00.9â‚¬/0 00 . 12 E= < 0 2 co E f : CÂ£ I 0 -1 CL 02 0 9=*m e *mil * 3:C~ ~ .. 28 E =**& E ,%55 5 4%@& E 4%3 W /000 Z Z 0 0 / 4 Ul ... 1,1 & d ...ul %%1-0 2 0000 a. O.0 Z al <1 0 a.<<w 3 0000 0 PARK BOND PARK SUBMITTED BY: Avocet Irrigation Design 2/1/2010 4â‚¬Â£'26+ :1 -: C; :L9 AVON SMH-01O183d IRRIGATED MONTH HISTORIC L P~UIREAMTENRT SYSTEM WEEKLY WATER MONTHLYWATER FICIENT R EFFICIENCY (%) REQUIREMENTS (IN.) REQUIREMENTS (GAL.) REQUIREMENTS (IN.) REQUIREMENTS (GAL.) GATED MONTH HISTORIC L LA WEEKLY WATER MONTHLY IRRIGATED MONTH HISTORI WEEKLYWATER MONTHLY WATER REQUIREMENTS (IN.) REQUIREMENTS (GAL.) halVM *1141NOW 831VM A1M33M 1 VOIHO1SIH HlNOW ('199) S.LNE,~13}InDEH ('NI) S.1.N31,3&,In03& (%) AON3131=131 1N3 IN3klln D37 1N310133300 13 ACRE FEET/YR. hIA/133=I 3&10V PEAK S A ON GPM INdS NOSVBS >IV3d 93BOV 031VDI BÂ¥31/1333 330Â¥ INds NOSV3 S >IV3d 2.46 5.82 JUNE 7.74 8.37 7.27 L 1Â¥101 AVO/'SWH-00183d 9.OOL DI Z Â°/0001. 994 19797Â¥ 0/000 L ltÂ· H3EIV~I31d3S 0.63 100% TEMBER TEMBER JUNE (Moderate Usage, JUNE 3Nnr (atiesn .01) Seloualoge UtelsAS %00 L 5uizililn peutu]Jelep eJE slueweilnbai Jele. luel FINE FESCUE 1Â¥IW31Â¥IN 1NVId 3AllyN se:oualo!#e weisks But/Aollo; 841 Jo esn elo pelle.1 pueuuep len;O PERIOD-HRS./DAY PERIOD-HRS./DAY bl390100, %06 - uolle61.Ul du SMOpUIM 6UpeleAA Maai g lueseided 13 Jeqo]00 9 ludv Overhead irrigation 75% \ /I- 49 , / /1 g / / / ///2 - 414 4 f </ V \ 9\\ ... I~ r C.1 ' \ -- 4 \ \ \ 3 r \ 7/3 1/ -97 1-l -7 - \ / - a , f 1 4 1\ 1 a //84- 4 us>y C--I , 1 /5// i o)' )/ 1 1 .7 1 0 0 d 0/- 0 , v *19, 'I- i // 4 0 /0\ 1 .CID 1 0 2 G. /1 \ /1 . W-, / 6-/ ky Â© 0 1- BOND PARK WINSTON 4696 Broadway Hâ€žulder, CO 80304 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN lel 101 440 9200 rax. 303 449 6911 .in,Â·Eon,w~ociat)/.lu 2 FEBRUARY 2010 SCALE 1 "=50' NORTH ASSocir\TES VAN HORN ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, [NC. e BOND PARK MASTER PLAN ~7