The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 2005-06-28r. , Prepared 06/22/05 ./4, 47 4 Ef zlfy.*.ydtic 4.9.. 9Â«44.4.t.9,Qf.'Â·. TOWN OF ESTE:S PARK neaÂ»Â»--u-Â«--t..3..3. .:/.92...:..:/-' .Â©24:Â·:Â· Ait~.:~.:~~p HMÂ£*S#*&*~0<43.fl*>f;9[.fkil?t:Â¤.> ~ * .~ C...%'., . 1..Â·rt **Wh ....Â·W y' Â·: her:642Â·549%~21;7;*34~99.~~32Â»filit-*'.?..~Â·9..~225Â©2~1- Â·. ....:... Â·Â· Â·Â·t-313,9...8.:~ Pâ‚¬. t>, &:. :t~JE,â‚¬6*PG:b. .9Â·-- -'449 lye.-9:Ept...f . I The Mission of the Town of Estes Fark le to plan and provide reliable, hiÂ®-value servicee for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take dreat pride eneurin0 and enhancin0 the cluality of life in our community by DeinG 00od stewarde of public resources and natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, June 28,2005 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. SWEARING-IN CEREMONY. Justin Petersen, Police Officer and Wes Kufeld, Commander. PRESENTATION. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting - Awarded by the Government Finance Officers Association - Town Administrator Repola. PUBLIC COMMENT (Please state your name and address). TOWN BOARD COMMENTS. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated June 14, 2005. 2. Bills. 3. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, June 7,2005 (acknowledgement only). 4. Estes Valley Planning Commission, June 21, 2005, 2005 (acknowledgement only). 5. National Electric Code, 2005 Edition - set public hearing date of July 26, 2005 to consider adoption. 1 0 r. l A. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing for all Consent Agenda Items. If the Applicant, Public or Town Board wish to speak to any of these consent items, they will be moved to the "Action Item" Section. CONSENT ITEMS: a) SUPPLEMENTAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: (i) Supplemental Condominium Map #2, Sundance Condominiums, Tract 69B of the First Replat of Tract 69, Fall River Addition, 1431 Sierra Sage Lane, Brian Murphy, LLC/Applicant. b) FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: (i) Rivers Pointe Downtown Condominiums, Lots 17, 18, 19, & 20, Hupps Addition, Block 6, Town of Estes Park, Cardinal Properties, LLC/Applicant. c) SUPPLEMENTAL AND FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: (i) Bugle Point Condominiums on Fall River, Lot 3, Block 4, Fall River Estates, Jim/Randy Company, Inc./Applicant. (ii) Bugle Point Condominiums on Fall River, Phase 11, Supplemental Map #3, Lot 4, Block 4, Fall River Estates, Jim/Randy Company, Inc./Applicant. d) SPECIAL REVIEWS: (i) Special Review 05-01, Horse-Drawn Carriage Service, Downtown Estes Park, Victor Anderson/Applicant. (ii) Special Review 05-02, Circle of Friends Montessori School, Lot 1, Saint Bartholomews Addition, 880 MacGregor Avenue, Circle of Friends Montessori School, Kay Lawson, Director/Applicant. e) FINAL SUBDIVISIONS: (i) Deer Ridge Subdivision, Amended Plat of Lots 3 and 4, Skoog Subdivision, Paul & Katherine Kochevar/Applicants. ACTION ITEMS: f) ANNEXATION & OTHER RELATED LAND ISSUES.: Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing. The formal public hearing will be conducted as follows: Mayor - Open Public Hearing Staff Report Town Attorney White read Resolution and Ordinances Public Testimony Mayor - Close Public Hearing One Motion to Approve/Deny Annexation, Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision. (i) Bosan Addition Annexation Request, Pawnee Meadows LLC/Applicant, Resolution #15-05 & Ordinance #9-05. (ii) Rezoning Request from RE-Rural Estate to Rl-Residential (7.75 ac.), and O-Office (1.85 ac.), and Development Agreement - The Neighborhood Subdivision, Lot 1, Bosan Addition, Boyette & Sandra Williams/Applicants, Ordinance 10-05. 2 (iii) Preliminarv Subdivision, The Neighborhood Subdivision, Lot 1, Bosan Addition, Boyette & Sandra Williams/Applicants. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. TOWN BOARD 2004-2006 GOAL TEAMS. Town Administrator Repola. A. Goal Team Update. B. Goal Team 1, Economic Development Strategy - RRC Proposal, $24,000 - Approval. 2. LIQUOR LICENSING - TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP FROM ROADSIDE PRODUCTIONS, INC., dba LONIGANS. INC. TO DCALS ENTERPRISES. INC.. dba LONIGANS SALOON NIGHTCLUB & GRILL, TAVERN LIQUOR LICENSE, 110 W. ELKHORN AVE. Town Clerk O'Connor. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 3 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 14, 2005 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 14~h day of June, 2005. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Homeier Lori Jeffrey-Clark Chuck Levine Wayne Newsom Bill Pinkham Also Present: Randy Repola, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: John Baudek, Mayor Mayor ProTem Doylen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and all desiring to do so, recited the Pledge of Allegiance. ; PUBLIC COMMENT (Please state your name and address) None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS None. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated May 24,2005. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safet~, May 26,2005: Police Department: 1. Amendment to Chapter 9.18 etal - Proposed Ordinance - See Action #1.A. below. 2. Alcoholic Beverage Tastings - Proposed Resolution - See Action #1.B. below. Fire Department: 1. Fireworks Permit - Longs Peak Scottish/Irish Highland Festival, Inc. - Approval. B. Community Development, June 2,2005: Special Events Department: 1. Parade Approvals: Rooftop Rodeo, July 129 Longs Peak Scottish Festival, Sept. 10th, and Come Catch the Glow, November 11th. 2. Stanley Park Master Plan, Phase 1 - Contract with DSWA/HE for Final Design, $61,194 ($50,000 budgeted in 2005 Budget and re-allocation of remaining $11,194 from 2005 Construction Budget). Board of Trustees - June 14,2005 - Page 3 read the Ordinance and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Homeier) Ordinance #7-05 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 3. RE-APPOINTMENT OF TRUSTEE JEFFREY-CLARK TO THE LARIMER COUNTY OPEN LANDS ADVISORY BOARD, JUNE 30,2008, It was moved and seconded (Levine/Pinkham) Trustee Jeffrey-Clark be re-appointed to a 3-yr. term on the Larimer County Open Lands Advisory Board, with the term expiring June 30, 2008, and it passed with Trustee Jeffrey-Clark Abstaining. 4. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Visitors Center Update. The center is now operating under summer hours and staff is seeing between 8-900 visitors/day during the week, and over 1,000 on weekends. B. Fish Creek Trail. This project is on schedule, and one lane of Fish Creek Road is closed for the duration of project. Completion is expected in late July/early August. C. Sales Tax. April sales tax revenues are up 9% from April, 2004; an analysis will be prepared by Finance Officer McFarland. Trustee Newsom noted that the barrier placed on the entrance to the Knoll-Willows Trail has been knocked down (installed due to elk calving), and he questioned if the Town had any liability concerns. Town Attorney White confirmed that the Town does have a responsibility to replace the barrier pursuant to dangerous conditions omission. Community Development Dir. Joseph added that permanent signs have been attached at both ends of trail as well. Administrator Repola will contact the Police Department for reinstallation of the barriers. 5. REQUEST TO ENTER EXECUTIVE SESSION: 24-6-402(4)(B), C.R.S. - Conference with Town Attorney White and Special Counsel Dawes for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions regarding the Habecker Lawsuit. Motion: It was moved and seconded (Levine/Pinkham) the Town Board enter Executive Session for a conference with Town Attorney White and Special Counsel Dawes for the purpose of receiving legal advice on the item listed above under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(B), and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor ProTem Doylen adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 7:29 p. m. Mayor ProTem Doylen reconvened the meeting to open session at 8:25 p.m. and as there were no further agenda items the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Board of Adjustment June 7,2005,8:00 a.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Board: Chair Al Sager, Members Cliff Dill, Bill Horton, Chuck Levine, Wayne Newsom, and Alternate Jeff Barker Attending: Members Dill, Levine, and Newsom Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott, Planner Shirk, and Recording Secretary Roederer Absent: Chair Sager, Member Horton Vice Chair Dill called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. The follawing minutes reflect the order of the agenda and not necessarily the chronological s~#Me. 1. CONSENT AGENDA The minutes of the May 3,2005 meeting. 2. SW PORTION OF LOT 23, GREELEY- 40*fIER COLON'79&41 5 Highway 66, Applicant: Daniel Hansen - Variance 1*NGest from Section ***ble 4-2, of the Estes Valley Development Code, recim*fo q a tend@ot side-vard96.tback and a fifteen-foot rear-yard setback in the E -7**tate zodi*i district Planner Shirk summarized the staff report.1~ that this is a request for a variance to Table 4-2, "Base 4*,D@[ty and DilÂ¥~bional Standards," of the Estes Valley Development Code to all~ se't~gli of five feet and in lieu of the ten-foot setback required and a r3Rk y2F&~k ofâ„¢9~et in lieu of the fifteen-foot setback required in the E-Estate'~lning~i~062Th~pose of these variance requests is to allow.,00~Dgement 3& 4Â£~P[33~bricated garage, which was installed in 2000 ,*11~iEF~ding p~he appIEnt had been informed by his building contrg~hat a liding p~ would not be required; therefore, no building permfills applied/ The ap d~t later discovered that a building permit was required aM%*began illi, as of Maining one through the Larimer County Building._[le[)arti-nenlea~~iiwf~<~~~5l|=im sen discovered the building does not - â‚¬4 01*0rier Shirk n.8.k th dit*R fact the applicant installed the garage without 'di~ge of thel~packll*lucrements should not be construed as special circu~5%2nces, howe(tija variety of features on the lot influenced the location of the buildin-0~liese featur~Include a well and drainage channel on the west side of the house, t\7~e pot-~sa pines (one in front of the house, the other beside it), and a drainage 8~ septic system in front of the house. It is the staff's opinion that the applicm@*IFedicament cannot be mitigated in any other way. The character of the neighboriÂ¥@5d is not substantially altered by the placement of the garage, which has bee in place for five years. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. A letter received from the Larimer County Health and Environment Department stated that they will require a septic inspection prior to signing off on the building permit. One letter was received from adjacent property owner, George Wilson, in support of the variance request. Another neighbor, Ellis Hattan, 2409 Highway 66, was present in support of the request, although he did not address the Board. Public Comment: The property owner, Daniel Hansen, was present. He stated he is taking responsibility for the error that was made and wants to clear up the situation. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 2 June 7,2005 Member Levine noted that the garage was placed farther from the property line than the home. Member Newsom stated that the problem was an error on the contractor's part and that Mr. Hansen should not be penalized. Member Levine commended Mr. Hansen for his efforts to correct the error. It was moved and seconded (Levine/Newsom) to approve the requested variance to allow a side-yard setback of five feet and a rear-yard setback of six feet, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with two absent. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall obtain a building permit and all requisite inspections from the Larimer County Building Department. 3. METES AND BOUNDS, Amended Lot 6 and a Portion of the E 14 of the NE 1/4 of Section 34, T5N, R73W, 2220 Windcliff Drive, Applicant:Windcliff Village, Inc. - Variance Requests from Estes Valley Development gl#iR Section 4, Table 4-2, requiring a minimum 50-foot front-Yard setback in #*1Â¢tE - Rural Estate zoning district, Section 6.3.C.2, Alteration/Extension 0.7.1~*=clconforming Structures Limited, and Section 7.13.B.2, Areas for outdooderslf'*Uection or compaction Planner Chilcott summarized the staff report. Q~~fited thal~*petitioner' s request is to allow expansion of an existing one-stor*~ facility locat@*su-1 a residential lot at the entrance to the Windcliff SubdivisiÂ¢f~Waste ManagerridÂ¥1*ehicles collect trash generated by the entire subdivisiotq~ this facilllÂ¥. Windcliff li~i~tgrown the facility and needs to expand to meet thelt*Els of gd@ift and future 191%]ents. The Windcliff Property Owners' Association h~//d a letter stating that this 1 11 expansion will meet the needs Qkesidents at stibtlitision build-out. The existing structure is 16' 6" !**19~*~*Nile prop~'84 addition to the front of the structure is approximately 6' b#~*18'."91~hooist~7~~sh facility is currently nonconforming as tolhe.fifty-foot 1*it-ygild~ b~g 6.7 feet from the front property line. It is ,~ in thelt?4~0Krd, ;R~~~&ian the rear or side yard as required by Se clid*Cl 3.B~~the EV@E'Legal notice was published for a variance to Section 6.3Â£ Alteratior*xtensioil~Nonconforming Uses Prohibited, but the trash facility iP~lapsified.26Â£@~ Goverrl!@bnt Facility (Utility, Minor), which is a permitted use in all*sid#fliNI~[6111'~~, PISQ~oted*at the trash facility is critical to the delivery of a public *pre to the e~lUoubdi*sion, is screened well by being built into a hillside, and ,Rit[&9rve the subc{~9*lpn nA*Lat build-out with only a 108-square-foot addition to therQ~Â£ling. A new T~ corrIFaction facility could be built that complies with the setbati~owever, th~uld require significantly more land disturbance and the current 104*ion is dqj#?ted well for garbage truck access. Although there is trash pick up six'9~ p**4ek, there is not enough storage space for the trash that is generated. Wf{!Ek*We expansion of the trash compactor building there may be problems with 6*Ts, as the properties that rely on this facility abut the National Forest and National Park. The proposed expansion would place the building within one foot of the property line and the design of building fits in with character of neighborhood. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. Comments concerning openings and fire-rated walls within three feet of the property line were received from Stan Griep, Larimer County Building Department's Lead/Commercial Plans Examiner. After learning that the adjacent lot includes Windcliff Drive, Mr. Griep ) advised that an opening for the trash facility door would be permitted. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Board of Adjustment 3 June 7,2005 Public Comment: Bud Duryea, President of the Windcliff Property Owners' Association, was present. He stated that the proposed addition will allow for two additional dumpsters and will have a positive impact for the Property Owners' Association, both financially and aesthetically. It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Levine) to approve the requested variances, with the findings and conditions recommended by staff, and the motion passed unanimously with two absent. CONDITIONS: 1. Compliance with the submitted plans. 2. A registered land surveyor shall set the survey stakes for the foundation forms. After the footings are set and prior to pouring the foundation, the surveyor shall verify compliance with the variance and provide a setback certificate. 3. All plans shall be stamped by a Colorado registered engineer. .,b.% :9/Pty 3*Ar 4. REPORTS '4'f' Director Joseph stated that Community Developt'netlt staff is-~PrÂ®essing a staff-level minor variance for expansion of the noncontormitig use of an A*Min Barlow plaza. '11 % -1,111 The ATM machine has been in place for a.,40#Uber of years, but M-?Cbmputer screen and keyboard have been added recently tor'informational and mar[6409 purposes. When the applicant applied for a sign perlrilfig becam'e clear that the kdditional use conflicts with the Town's containment ordindi~, .whicfi requires that all businesses be fully contained within a building A change to fli@ Estes Valley Development Code ) will be proposed to specificall**116*. ATMs to 64 located on the exterior face of buildings in the CD - Conir~iercifi;.06*Hibwn zoning 'di,ati Ict. Â®t ..194Â¥,A '$90 -,9.1.:. 1 ':'.i *94. There being no further..businast-Â«Ice Cl'{4]rd*%djoum*Nhe meeting at 8:23 a.m. 4Â»1 â‚¬Â·IC : t..Cht -7/'*.I k:-,1? '1~3{J .32 1Â·5% 1.44. 96 49F 4:4'b.. ~01*11.-1*%..0.b .*y: 41,~Â·Â·Â· . ~ ~'=a.: F=*,,a ~,1%9'UE Vice Chair 04Â£&i24*:0â€¢.-le t.:..0â€ž ./Zâ‚¬r -3'465.-4 '.Kilk N-71. '12>~Py. An.*e Â·-1 E.1 *49. Julie Roederer, Recording Secretary -469. 4:?40.4 , 17.9% 4% 4Â¥L ....92$ .9,&6 4Â¢E-4- %26**' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission June 21, 2005,1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Commission: Chair Joyce Kitchen, Commissioners Wendell Amos, Ike Eisenlauer, George Hix, Bill Horton, Betty Hull, and Edward Pohl Attending: Commissioners Amos, Eisenlauer, Hix, Hull, and Pohl Also Attending: Director Joseph, Planner Chilcott, Planner Shirk, Town Board Liaison Homeier at Study Session, and Recording Secretary Roederer =al "44'- Absent: Chair Kitchen, Commissioner Horton, IP,+T Attorney White . cft.?ft.': '11):?11.1 ?11,~ . I +1 4~41/ Â» 4, . V.,-:.-/ Acting Chair Pohl called the meeting to order,*060 p.m. N;*34 5Â·fify>Â· - -ti.- 7Â¥,4 The following minutes reflect the order 1%61 ihe agenda and not n~*sarily the chronological sequence of the meeting. KI ;tj,jj;jpl 1. CONSENT AGENDA .41%'. . 014/'â€¢ a. Estes Valley Planning CoIT?*i*fon.minutes*ated May 17,2005. ~:rilt: e:I It was moved and seconded (ArfEALHull)'{Ji*the Coh*nt Agenda be accepted, / and the motion pass*841*animouhawithiWo'hb*Â¥t. "5!b,9,9 41-62 -3:314, ?:Â£Â«4. ~55% 2. PUBLIC COMM#NT iâ€ž,0~, 'AU None. -34.-94 5 9 1-1 -2. .1*?OlliE y 3. MINGA'SUBON*lpN %'1*T, KENDALL CANYON RANCH ESTATES, Metes and 88#Kds, 1915 Drf,Allch*MBad, Applicant: Del and Judy Kendall / I:.: Plat**~Shirk revie~*d. the stkit report. This is a proposal to subdivide a 41.64-acre e.Â·24 parcefÂ¥#~four single*mily lots and two non-buildable outlots. The property was formerlyybed for the .42*y B ranch, which will be discontinued with this subdivision, The site had*rnoc~e'thtd southeast-facing slope, contains a variety of buildings that were used bft#***4; B ranch, and is currently served by well and septic systems. The proposed n*10'lots will be served by public facilities, while the existing dwelling on proposed Lot 1 will continue to be served by the well and septic. The property is zoned RE-1, Rural Estate, which requires 10 acres of land area per lot. This proposal is for a four-lot subdivision, which meets the density calculation require- ments. Section 4.3.D of the Estes Valley Development Code requires that all residential subdivisions containing five or more units set aside 30% of the land area for private open space in the RE-1 zoning district. Although open space is not required for this minor subdivision, the applicant proposes a 30% reduction in lot size from ten acres to seven acres, resulting in the creation of two outlots totaling nine acres. The applicant proposes to retain ownership of the open-space lots, which is allowed under the EVDC. In accordance with Section 7.4.G, these lots will be subject to a deed restriction to ensure they are not used as building sites or assimilated into Lot 1 for any potential future subdivision. The property currently exceeds the maximum cumulative square footage of accessory buildings allowed, which is 18,056 square feet, and is non-conforming as RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 2 June 21, 2005 to accessory buildings, having outbuildings that total 24,805 square feet. The applicant proposes to remove several small accessory buildings. There are currently four dwellings located on proposed Lot 1. The applicant proposes to remove the kitchens from two of those structures, keep the third as a guest house, and use the fourth as their residence. Although proposed Lot 1 does not have enough land area to allow an accessory dwelling unit, it is the staff's opinion that the existing dwellings the applicant proposes to maintain should be considered legally non-conforming. The existing guest house should be deed restricted to ensure it will not be rented or used separately from the main house. The applicant proposes to re-align the existing drive connection so the drive will enter Dry Gulch Road at a right angle. In addition, the developer will pave the driveway past the "Y" in the drive, which will increase safety-and reduce erosion onto Dry Gulch Road. A driveway maintenance agreement will.b.Â»ecorded with the plat. Additional right-of-way has been dedicated on the east fidE,of Dry Gulch Road. A 474. The applicant has proposed building envelopes 0.*tabliÂ¢b, limits of disturbance. Compliance with tree and vegetation root-proteptiontstanda?def,or the installation of utilities and drives will be required. An exiÂ®Â¢9'vvater mainhARRcated along the eastern side of Dry Gulch Road; servi~0.iPMs will be extend@~Â¢kgt the time of construction. Pursuant to comments recÂ¢@d from Fire Chief Dorm*40[1 additional fire hydrant should be installed. Undei-gro'Und- electrictiA'frastructure will#Be installed at the developer's expense. An existing sar#fary,b-wbr main is located along the western side of Dry Gulch Roactiervice lines 411Â·b@extended to proposed lots 2,3, and 4 at the time of constru4fte#*Â£d the didd|*ure notice should include this information. Lot 1 will continue J~~flii@existing sep~Â¢*ystem. If this system should fail, Lot 1 will be required to conrktto ili@'100,pei Th34*pn Sanitation District. An easement through prgr#ed Lot 316as beell,?Abllicatedlb allow for future sanitary .Vait *,1 11 11 1 -1 4. sewer connection. Th64UE,nitted stdfmpÂ®fef iiiaiiage-nlent plan has been reviewed by the Larimer .060rity En'gifj'eering Gfi*rtment, whlch requested clarification but approved the,50*'ral conce*, Planneffe~irk noted that the Planning Commission must find that14*eval of thiÂ©-ninor subdj tsion will not be materially detrimental to the public welfar~Â®iurioÂ®Â·'toit>tq,@rÂ·,Rroperf,9 in the neighborhood, or in conflict with the purpotesgnd objettik of thd#Â§169~Va'lley Development Code, I, + <4,4 Thepfat include64*,t;,benty-fixe-foot-wide trail easement along the eastern property fiN*phich will he'lp facilita-~ e implementation of the Estes Valley Trails plan. Platibip-9 staff also 'tregommehds that twenty-five-foot-wide trail easements be dedical*Il along the ss?:uthem and western property lines, which could provide an eventuallfalfway poirityconnection back to the Devil's Gulch Road/Dry Gulch Road portion of }f~~ropq.s#*trails plan. Planner Shirk noted that the applicant would like to contend this~~gfetommendation. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and to adjacent neighbors for consideration and comment. Comments were received from the Larimer County Engineering Department and Town Attorney Greg White. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code 4 compliance or the provision of public services. The Colorado Division of Wildlife made comments regarding wildlife damage to landscaping, fencing dangers to wildlife, bears and garbage, and danger to domestic animals. These comments should be included in the disclosure notice. The North End Property Owners' Association provided a letter in support of the request. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 3 June 21, 2005 Public Comment: Amy Plummer of Van Horn Engineering and Surveying was present to represent the applicant. She stated that she had discussed the location of the additional fire hydrant with Fire Chief Dorman and had provided a revised ISO map to planning staff. The applicant wishes to allow for an accessory building of up to 800 square feet to be built on each of lots 2,3, and 4 to provide lot owners the opportunity to build a small horse barn on their property. She stated the applicant's objection to the twenty-five-foot-wide trail easement across the western and southern portion of the property. The applicant, Del Kendall, addressed the Commission, stating he has already removed some of the accessory buildings on proposed lot 1 and will remove others. A discussion followed regarding the proposal to allow an accessory building on lots 2, 3, and 4. Vice-Chair Pohl suggested the applicant consjder continuance of this request to the July Planning Commission meeting to a'{* time for the details regarding the accessory buildings to be worked out. IVI~*Mall declined to agree to a continuance. It was agreed to adopt the "Exiskrigâ‚¬Mi~ilrlinrim" summary as a condition of approval, showing specifically whicnp~rac buildings will be removed from lot 1, as well as limiting each of l~s:13 3,2 maximum of 800 square feet of detached accessory buildings,,&th' Kendal, ...t'-,gd his willingness to comply with the condition. 91 if'11. . Â£*WI Adjacent property owner, Lowell Andriws of 586,14* Beaver Dri?*stated his I. 11 1 1, ' 1 opposition to the proposed twenty-five-foot-wiele lf#11*Pasement across the western and southern portion of the property. He -'**~ltated that the Beaver View Homeowners' Association was 4Â®hingously su!30*tjÂ¥e of the applicant's request to subdivide the property at their m&*~4*May 20053*4. A discussion followed regarding thd*.oposeÂ¢ktreob:easerE@ht along the southern and I / 1 -r .0 le.: western property '11**M*Kendall *~e,d>is strdh'@(0bjection to the proposed trail easement along 0*southdfli*nd westerÂ¢f'property lines and noted his willingness to dedicate trail eahÂ¢Fhent alor~~~~e eastef*roperty line. L ..C 4102% 1 Qt It was moved 41%1*eceÂ¥14@81*14!f}jÂ® '* recommend approval of the Minor Subdiyillianâ‚¬lat, 1Â¢*88*ff Cany@hil#Â®th Estates, Metes and Bounds, to the Boar@38*%844.uty -4thmmissioners, with the findings and conditions r,Â¢4Nlmended 15*staff3*hkthe motion passed unanimously with two absent. 84#PITIONS: ~49:i Nit '62, 4 ... 1.9~**developer stiallt remo,>0 buildirgs from Lot 1, as shown on the submitted "E2*#g Buildings'~*mmary. 2. Lots 12*. and 4 s.bal) be limited to a maximum of 800 square feet of detached accessBrÂ¥*ulrlin/,tur each lot. A note to this effect shall be placed on the plat. 3. A deed redthotio#tur the proposed accessory dwelling on Lot 1 shall be recorded with the platm*6bdivision. 4. A driveway maintenance agreement shall be recorded with the plat. 5. A fire hydrant shall be installed as per the ISO map dated June 15, 2005. This plat shall not be heard by the Board of County Commissioners until the preliminary plans for the main extension have been reviewed and approved by the Town of Estes Park Public Works Department. 6. The applicant shall relocate and pave the intersection of Kendall Drive and Dry Gulch Road in accordance with the Intersection Detail, which shall be amended to include the following: the location and detail of the stop sign and street name sign, the location of the fire hydrant and water main, and the existing drive connection on the west side of the "Y." 7. All access easements should be 45 feet wide. 8. An access easement should be provided to the leach field in Outlot B. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 4 June 21, 2005 9. A development agreement, disclosure notice, and subordination shall be submitted for review and approval by Staff prior to recordation of the plat, and shall be recorded with the plat. 10. The development agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following: removal of structures, road paving and revegetation, electric infrastructure, fire hydrant and water main, and as-built plans. 11.The disclosure notice shall include, at a minimum, the following: Lots 2-4 detached accessory building maximum size; all fences shall comply with standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code; all garbage containers shall be bear-proof; road cuts and associated permits may be required for water service. 12. All property within the subdivision shall be included in the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. 10 11. 4. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT, RESUBDIVISIgN OF LOT 1, SEIFFERT ADDITION, 470 Moccasin Circle Drive, Applicant~*~t~ojcik Planner Shirk stated the applicant has req uested 4**th i s*#*1 be continued to the August 16,2005 Planning Commission meeting(1 C -t'Al 4 -=. .%*h Public Comment: None. 5 %4 7/ d .4,5 J Â·L It was moved and seconded (Hix/Amos) -44 -continue the Preliminary Subdivision Plat, Resubdivi*ha,of Lot 1,- Sbiffert Addition, 470 Moccasin Circle Drive, to the Planning CMÂ¥*hnion meeilÂ¥~*n August 16, 2005, and the motion passed unanimously witÂ¤W~hant. NA . I .4 -2. ./1 ..61,9.'ye. poÂ©,0,44 5. AMENDED PLATi*AE*4*IDE 01*EakIL RIVER, Lot 2 of Amended Plat of Lot 2, Deer Crestpal;Etivision,1*Ad Tract*A, Fall River Addition, 1260 & 1350 Fall River Road, AÂ¢~icant: strd#Rlside of 1~es Park, LLC Planner Chilcott red~#W#fl#hetti# 8*c,rf,ffits is a request to combine two lots, both zoned,it'All.1.,At}pommod[Â®*s/Highwag-06#Idor, into one lot. The first lot, 15.94 acres in :s,ike,'is 211'4Â®lly 712*eloped as a nineteen-unit accommodations property, 1 -Â·?Ae @Â¢#Friside on Fjll,bRiver.44.st of the lot is steeply sloped and heavily treed. The s**0 lot of 0.88-1~ is &fi*ntly undeveloped. It fronts US Highway 34, is fairly flat,*i*pis not locateditia mapped hazard area. Combining the two lots would allow the alipil@a-nt to devel*additional units on the smaller lot. Accommodations units cannot b 43:Developed*b this lot without the lot combination since it is less than 40,000 squjR*;4Â¢et.~*ize. The applicant has discussed development of twenty-four units on the 0218*0% lot and twenty-two units on the 15.94-acre lot, with possible expansion and 7@modeling of existing units. The new units are proposed in three buildings; the initial design appears to minimize impact to the steeply-sloped, heavily-treed portion of the larger lot. The amended plat will allow accommodations development to occur on land suited for this type of development; staff is supportive of the proposal. Planner Chilcott noted that the existing land use, accommodations, is a conforming use, although some of the existing structures are nonconforming as to setbacks. The lot complies with minimum size and width requirements, and the portion of the lot that will become developable for accommodations uses, i.e., the 0.88-acre parcel, can demonstrate a building site and has a depth that is adequate for off-street service and parking facilities. The lot combination wil[ reduce the river setback from fifty to thirty feet. The southern portion of the larger lot is in a mapped steep-slope area and a mapped wildfire-hazard area. Staff recommends platting a limits of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 5 June 21, 2005 disturbance with the amended plat to prohibit development on the most steeply sloped areas. Although it is not required with an amended plat, the applicant has agreed to dedicate a fifteen-foot-wide pedestrian hike/bike trail easement along the property line fronting Elkhorn Avenue and Fall River Road with this plat, which will simplify the development plan review process. Staff will recommend trail construction with development plan approval; this will trigger construction of trail at Bear Creek Luxury Condos, as well. This request was submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff and adjacent property owners for consideration and comment. Comments were received from the Estes Park Public Works Department, Town Attorney Greg White, and the Colorado Department of Transportation. Per the recommendation of the Public Works Department, the applicant will be required to provide a shared-driveway mainten- ance agreement between all the stakeholders. Planner Chilcott noted that the Planning Commission Ii}jj:~Ed that approval of this minor subdivision will not be materially detrimental toÂ®..41@blic welfare, injurious to other property in the neighborhood, or in conflict witlitt'Re t)0*oses and objectives of .....#.I the Estes Valley Development Code. 6Â»â‚¬ f Public Comment: -desâ‚¬r .C,te Zach Hanson of Van Horn Engineering dsurveying,as presenl resent the applicant and stated the applicant agreed'f*WI the coMdifions provid . staff. It was moved and seconded (Amos/Hiv)'41*( recommend approval of the Amended Plat, Streamside 0*A~iver, Lot litAmended Plat of Lot 2, Deer Crest Subdivision, and Tract 5Â§#, 'Fall-River A8dttign, 1260 & 1350 Fall River Road, to the Town Board of*ruste@st 'with tl*#indings and conditions recommended by staff,and the MÂ¢j-on'?8~*twag!9'W6sly with two absent. CONDITIONS: cl~.6'1-~~AL .4 4.20- -4-92 '.9. 1. Compliance p.[{bfthe cortilients in & f40.White's memo, 2. Complianc,e*ih the com*ints in Gd*6Sievers' memo. 3. Plat a limit&~6(,djsturbandâ‚¬*vith the ar'Andecl plat to prohibit development on the most steeply 41Â¢*ed.aga~W,Â®%4..int@*ating that the limits of disturbance can bgrR.qlftâ‚¬,withl@*HTeview KiÂ¥81:MÂ®Foval of a site-specific plan. The proposed 11fflitgbrMtitli,bancE'*Ijall be reviewed and approved by staff. ***I ity easent#Q#.:shal[ b,4:?dedicated along all property lines with the exception of 1%*1 southern prdÂ¢*ty lina:rgpping through Fall River. 5. T>1*Ldedication st**nent #Mall be revised to dedicate all new easements, e.g., ther.broposed trail 04#ement. 6. The 01*shall be rÂ¢*ned, e.g., "Streamside Plat of Lot 2 ..." 7. Note #4-14.ball bel*noved, which states that the sole purpose of the plat is to combine 13GbIBi-815lat also dedicates easements. 8. The sentenc*@tating, "...In the event a service line is relocated to a new or existing easement." in Note #5 shall be clarified. 9. The trail easement shall be labeled as a non-motorized trail easement or as a hike/bike trail easement for clarification. 6. REPORTS Director Joseph reported that a public meeting had been held regarding the proposed changes to the A - Accommodations zoning district, noting that there was public opposition to the proposed changes and the Town Board would likely vote to deny the recommended changes. He stated there are a few portions of the * development code that are in conflict with allowing the use of individual condominium units to move freely in and out of permanent occupancy. Minor 0 -. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission 6 June 21, 2005 revisions to the Estes Valley Development Code will be suggested to clear up those inconsistencies. Planner Chilcott reported on the Bear Creek Development Plan 04-14, noting that staff is recommending that condition #7, requiring an access easement to be vacated prior to final development plan approval, be changed to state, ".., prior to issuance of a building permit for new construction or issuance of a grading permit for the new parking lot." There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:05 p.m. Edward B. Poh' A,Atiri@-sChair ..... :IX'46Â· 1 - I +PlaÂ· - ..02,3 -Al 4.7. ,-aY*/ A â‚¬:2.- Julie RomBRPdr, Recordin-0<I~baretary 9%4. Â¥1 11: b %1*4 9*96 't. / iON:--- .141,3.- 4- 1 b' .1 4~~Mlt, 4 - 1* 'T " "Â·7.25 + #fÂ«tal> "~f till *13'. ".34>- AFF; '49. liLi. f '4 - 70% 43*80 47 *4 42 .f; -..*=7=-T -fae#7 -a-- - allir. ldÂ©2 1--- -2 1 7/ell Nt:- lab 919. Â»A '*Â»fit. 3. A -- 7<4 124,3 L- 1,42.. 429567 9Mt Â£Â»ty: 413;03Â« 9 Al' Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: Bob Joseph, Director, and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: June 23,2005 Subject: Sundance Supplemental Map #2 Sierra Sage Lane - Off Fall River Road Tract 69B of the First Replat of Tract 69 Fall River Addition Background. The applicant, Brian Murphy, LLC, has submitted a supplemental condominium map application for Sundance Condominiums on Tract 69B of the First Replat of Tract 69, Fall River Addition. Supplemental map #2 consists of one unit, Unit 5, addressed 1431 Sierra Sage Lane. The final map is consistent with the approved development plan. This is a 6.77-acre lot, zoned "RM" Multi-Family Residential. Ten residential units are shown on the preliminary map and this is the third unit to be condominiumized. At the September 28,2004 meeting, the Town Board approved the first supplemental map for Sundance Condominiums. Budget. None. Â« NOCKY MOUNTÂ·AIN NATIONAL PARK 8/UICARY '' Action. 2&44 Approval of Sundance Supplemental Condominium Map #2 application conditioned on compliance with Greg White's letter dated June 44'82-11/HTY-E 15,2005. **DMSI,N 11112-1 - 4- 1-7-3 --7--1.---4Â»11-l A F-1--~ VICINTY MAP f Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: Bob Joseph, Director, and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: June 23,2005 Subject: Rivers Pointe Downtown Final Condominium Map, Applicant: Cardinal Properties, LLC Background. This is a final condominium map application to condominiumize a proposed 20,592- square-foot, two-story building on the former site of Bob's Amoco, at the corner of West ) Elkhorn Avenue and Weist Drive. This 0.381-acre lot is zoned "CD" Downtown Commercial. The development is a public/private partnership between the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority and Cardinal Properties. The first floor contains four units with 3,885 square feet of retail space and one unit, owned by EPURA, with 4,728 square feet of space, which may be used for a cultural arts facility. An alternative use of EPURA's unit is to divide it into four retail spaces. The second floor contains nine residential/accommodations units, six studios and three one-bedroom units, ranging in size from 909 to 1,031 square feet. At the December 14, 2004 meeting, the Town Board conditionally approved the Rivers Pointe Downtown preliminary condominium map. The final condominium map is consistent with the preliminary map. Budget. ~37 L--1 TH -1~~= ~ None. , ~-,-nmf-8 2 --1 ia Action. 1..~ Approval of the final condominium map with the IA , -LE:khorn Ave. _-â€¢0~ following conditions (1) compliance with the Tri'-1- =11'In conditions of approval, (2) designation of the f~ ~ public sidewalk as either a general or limited 1wr*~.ar&1,4-T- memo. Town of Estes Park J Community Development Depaitment Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: Bob Joseph, Director, and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: June 23,2005 Subject: Bugle Point on Fall River, Lot 3, Block 4, Fall River Estates, Jim Randy Company, Inc./Applicant Bugle Point on Fall River Phase 11, Supplemental Map # 3, Lot 4, Block 4, Fall River Estates, Jim Randy Company, Inc./Applicant. Background. Jim Randy Company (Jim Randy, President, and Randy Collins, Secretary) has submitted final condominium map applications to condominiumize sixteen residential/accommodations units on Lot 3, Block 4, Fall River Estates and twenty-two residential/accommodations units, an office/laundry building, and a recreation building on Lot 4, Block 4, Fall River Estates. Development Plan #99-04 for Lot 3 and Development Plan #99-05 for Lot 4 were approved by the Estes Park Planning Commission on April 20, 1999 and existing units have been built in accordance with these development plans. The sites are located at 1480 David Drive (Lot 3) and 1516 Fish Hatchery Road (Lot 4). Lot 3 is 2.331 acres and Lot 4 is 3.139 acres; both lots are zoned "A" Accommodations/Highway Corridor. At the January 25, 2005 meeting, the Town Board conditionally approved preliminary condominium maps for both lots. The final condominium maps are consistent with the preliminary maps. Between 2000 and 2002, the property owner recorded ~ ~' ~ ti â€ž 1 condominium maps and declarations for these lots l 14- i L 1 4 19 US 34 (Fall Rivp- 1- to without the required Town review and approval. When p staff became aware of this, we required Town review ish HatcheI~~Rd ~ - ~'~ - and approval. Review primarily involves correcting the 11 F tiluer F . b illegal subdivision of Lots 3 and 4, correcting errors on ~~ ~ j the recorded maps, dedicating utility and pedestrian L - Lot 4 -' L 1~ FIsh H~tche~Â¥ Rd ;M <~&*o easements, and constructing trail along Fish Hatchery Road. Lot 3 1480 David Dr. Budget. None. Action. Approval of the final condominium map with the following conditions: Compliance with the Town Board preliminary condominium map conditions of approval; Compliance with the comments in Greg White's June 15, 2005 memo; Compliance with the comments in the Upper Thompson Sanitation District's June 13, 2005 letter, which includes dedication of easements to provide access to a sewer main and fortification of sidewalk to handle the weight of a heavy truck. Fortification should occur prior to recordation of the Bugle Point on Fall River Phase It Supplemental Map #3 and the fortification should be approved by the Upper Thompson Sanitation District; Submittal of the signed pedestrian hike/bike trail easement for recordation in conjunction with Town recordation of the Bugle Point on Fall River Phase 11, Supplemental Map #3 condominium map; and Submittal of an affidavit of correction for Bugle Point on Fall River for staff approval and Town recordation in conjunction with the Bugle Point on Fall River Phase Il, Supplemental Map #3. â€¢ Page 2 Community Development f ~ Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: Dave Shirk, Planner 33</5 Date: June 22,2004 Subject: Horse Drawn Carriage Ride Special Review Background. This is a Special Review proposal for horse-drawn carriage rides within the Town of Estes Park. Services are to include wedding transportation, other special events, and carriage rides along a fixed route. Normal hours of operation for the fixed route will be from 10:00 AM until 9:00 PM daily. The proposed route is one that has been approved by the Town on prior occasions. The limited route of operation will be as follows: â€¢ Drop-off and pick-up locations are proposed to be limited to the Stanley Hotel, the Transit Center, and Tregent Park. St. Bartholomew's has provided a letter of intent to allow Mr. Jones to use their parking lot after wedding ceremonies. â€¢ The travel route will begin at the Stanley Hotel traveling south down McGregor Avenue to Bond Park. â€¢ The route will continue west on Elkhorn Avenue to Tregent Park where it will end. The carriage will turn around in the Tregent Park parking lot and return along the previously traveled route returning to the Stanley Hotel. Budget. NA Action. At their regularly scheduled May 17, 2005 meeting, the Estes Valley Planning Commission voted to recommend APPROVAL of Special Review 05-01 to , allow horse drawn carriage rides CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Applicant shall obtain a business permit from the Town Clerk. Prior to issuance of business permit, Applicant shall: a. Provide a copy of a Certificate of Insurance for $1,000,000 to the Town, with the Town to be named as an additional insured. b. Obtain written permission from property owners for specified stops on private property, including the Stanley Hotel, St. Bartholomew Chruch, and Our Lady of the Mountains Catholic Church. c. Submit a revised site plan incorporating the following: â€¢ Signature block: APPROVAL: Approved by the Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees this day of ,2004. John Baudek, Mayor â€¢ Any future additions or revisions to the routes or stops to be approved by Town Staff. â€¢ No signage shall be allowed on public property. â€¢ If traffic conflicts or other use conflicts occur on the streets or at the public stop locations, Town Staff is authorized to restrict operations until the problem is corrected. This is intended to account for accidents, parade routes, periods of heavy traffic, or other instances of traffic hazards or congestion. â€¢ All horses shall be diapered during times of service. â€¢ Horses shall wear a rubber overlay shoe. â€¢ Public Drop-off shall be limited to Transit Center and Tregent Park. 2. A copy of the business license and Special Review permit shall kept with the carriage. Mff.-trrae#--0."Â·"IT-:-:3zglpt-421"* \ z 3014&2" + ./ 'LI_4 -T-- tr?.4 }Â£2.*, Â»rÂ« i. . , 3 0 i"h: ~\ f j 1 -re--7-1- 1 41 -11-1 - : 14 1 1 CINTÂ·IÂ·/Â·Ill---11.~UJ-Â» - . 27-7.17 1 _Rn , j i.-41 ' 1 91.. - L:. .... '-7$ < 1 .i - . 4-1.. 1 . Â·Â· . i- Â· -w Â·Dist.k Â·"' - ~FIS-----1 : 4 ':096. - 4 . - 1 f 1 Ny' 1 4 6 Â»I <ic .4 7;w-:6- 72*9L*fit~~ 9~.-T 3.fif 1 ;--1 - 2 - ?44Â·.9% r., 6.:.- ~ .~- F /20 ri'~ ... li . .1 â€¢ Page 2 091 8#Â»-Â»44->1 4, .~.. 9-- ....I:-r-w#404.*-*~~- - 4 Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: Bob Joseph, Director, and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: June 23,2005 Subject: Circle of Friends Montessori School Special Review #05-02 Church of Saint Bartholomew The Apostle 850/880 MacGregor Avenue Background. The Montessori School has moved from the YMCA property on CO Highway 66 and is operating a child care center at Saint Bartholomew's Church for a maximum of ten children between twelve and thirty-six months old. This property is zoned "RM" Multi-Family Residential and special review is required for child care centers in this zoning district. This a temporary location. The Montessori School is continuing to search for a permanent location and plans on expanding their programs once they find a permanent location. Staff approved a temporary use permit on May 5,2005 to allow the Montessori School ?St...Bmt to relocate to the church property while the ; m=~~t#"-7~~uped ~m~. | ~ special review application is being '~~~~=~~ processed. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the special + review application at their May 17, 2005 -34 1 1 (*.4644,71.'rjri:lillililikilikilidild"/blk/lid 'llille"J' V meeting. RM r ~1 Budget. ..i~li-93* 101 I Community Development Committee recommended waiver of the $400 special ___~~ review fee on June 2,2005. .r---T-EF-th. /,i. -1 1 1-t ''11 1 .,1.1 1~ , *6*32*'i'.Â·:~ . -1 0 s Â·A, . f:,0...ispe Action. Approval of the Circle of Friends Montessori School Special Review #05-02. Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: David Shirk -,4.6 Date: June 23,2005 Subject: Deer Ridge Preliminary Plat Background. This is a request for a four lot Final Plat of the Deer Ridge Subdivision. The Town Board approved the Preliminary Plat on February 4, 2004, and a Preliminary Plat time extension on April 8,2005. The applicant is now ready to finalize the plat for sale of the lots. The site is located at 1925 Homestead Lane. Preliminary plat approval included a change of zoning from 'RM" Multi-Family to "E- 1" Estate. Budget. NA Action. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Deer Ridge Subdivision Final Plat CONDITIONAL TO: 1. Compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat. 2. A Development Agreement shall be submitted for recording with the final mylars. This agreement shall include all required infrastructure work such as fire hydrant, water and sewer mains, drainage facilities, the road, and warranty. 3. The stormwater detention basin shall be redesigned to include 2-3 feet of earthen fill around the outer perimeter, and the outflow channel as a pipe flowing through the fill. This design shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department. 4. The proposed curb shall be redesigned to provide a curb height of 6" instead of the 5" proposed. 5. Construction drawings shall be submitted for review and approval prior to installation of utilities. 6, Compliance with the memo from Greg White to Dave Shirk dated June 15, 2005 (these are minor technical details). 7. The 20' utility easement in the northerly portion of Lots 3 and 4 shall be fully delineated (not just the centerline). 8. The 30' access easement across Lot 4 shall be delineated with distances and bearings. Eb.- trz-~7._='424 5 za. 'Ar TRACT 94. RIL RIFIR ADDErfoR 4 / f 1 simt %'%24Â· YXIAO,rN si -27-1 ''' 1.'.d :8 'il/ .- .-4- iii / / ...\/1 / il 64*2 -. 4 /\ \ < 24 f\\ ... 9 i 5 \ \ \ _----------7--Ii ; ./i lil \, tj//,5//- *1 -1/1 1 Â·qi Ix ri r / 4,/31 . il V )/pj --- \2.- - th I i N Pfrdi, TLe-fr7 1 4. \>=n il # 4 ~~~fr, - % '-/5 *180MS*N PLAT 213%94Â·n.-..,~1 k& 4 2-OG SUB. Vr-- .y 4. rmin' 91 1 ~~-Â«22-----*-4 1------ / 11 1 * -%44Â·32,/ 1 A W f F \e>râ„¢. i Stue i ,/ra,-A--~ % I airro,Â¢ 800'0Â£,tr 45.USâ„¢ENÂ· PUT A. 1. t ! i -i 1 17. tz. Nace, 1 ; r/ 1 *94/ LOT 1 ---- ----- ~g~~.~ -- ~~~*~t\,~*Â·-?MiK,~#A L 1/7 1 jurd~~% = -- it *th%984- -~Â· V -- - 0, Ae, f ' Â· ft/-- ' *J ~6 n,Or 87 -*24~lay - BIrrON BOUNDARY iD,USâ„¢%!fr Pur .../... ---- â€¢ Page 2 *N .. 407 f-y:=mi-.oo.0940 Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Repola From: Bob Joseph, Director, and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: June 24,2005 Subject: Bosan Addition Annexation Request, Pawnee Meadows, LLC/Applicant, Resolution #15-05 & Ordinance #9-05. Rezoning Request from RE-Rural Estate to Rl -Residential (7.75 ac.), and O-Office (1.85 ac.), and Development Agreement - The Neighborhood Subdivision, Lot 1, Bosan Addition, Boyette & Sandra Williams/Applicants Ordinance #10-05: Preliminary Subdivision, The Neighborhood Subdivision, Lot 1, Bosan Addition, Boyette & Sandra Williams/Applicants. Background. Bosan Addition - Annexation Pawnee Meadows, LLC has submitted a petition for annexation of a 9.946-acre, metes and bounds, property located at the Dry Gulch Road/Red Tail Hawk Drive intersection. The property is addressed 995 Dry Gulch Road. Pawnee Meadows, LLC is purchasing the property from Boyette and Sandra Williams. The proposed annexation plat dedicates | ~ L right-of-way for Dry Gulch Road and Red t.. ' 1....:..Â·i:,-:.1- kÂ¢-t.:5-1, :.:IWIP-3/ Tail Hawk Drive. Red Tail Hawk Drive will be subject to a slope easement granted to ' -Good sâ€¢mantan 4 1 . V,Hage the Estes Park Housing Authority in 2002. . - Undev ;loped ' 2--; 'Â·'- Â·Â·u, SÂ·~y~3- :8 Ownet by EP - 'i 1-ifif,HE CDOT subrnitted comments encouraging ....Â· Â· Housiris'<ilitl~orl .i.,I. 4. -9 44 review of traffic impacts at the US Highway )-Â·I.r~1 r ~ ~4 SITE 1-3Ch 1 2 k 409 1 Vista 1 "RE" 1 1/E- 11 MacGregor 7 LRIdge Ranch Page 1 of 4 18*37 -411 - 45-3 1 l - 1*- L 'Â·17Â£ f V t.-1.1 11 -1 k --I - ll- I r j ~ F 34/Dry Gulch Road intersection. A study has been submitted that will be reviewed with the final subdivision application. Rezoning The property is currently zoned "RE" Rural Estate, which requires a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. This is a request to rezone the western 5.734 acres to "R-1" Single-Family Residential, which requires a 5,000-square-foot minimum lot size, and the eastern 1.849 acres to "O" Office, which requires a 15,000-square-foot minimum lot size, prior to site- specific adjustment. The "R-1" Single-Family Residential zoning district was established for attainable housing development only. At the May 17, 2005 meeting, the Estes Valley Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the rezoning application with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. The vote was unanimous with two absent and one abstention. Preliminary Plat This is a preliminary subdivision plat application to divide a 9.946-acre parcel into thirty-two lots. The proposed subdivision will include: a. Thirty single-family residential lots on 5.734 acres. Fifteen lots will be deed restricted for twenty years and sold to households earning one-hundred percent or less of the median income. Pawnee Meadows, LLC's intent is to sell the remaining fifteen lots to households earning 120 percent or less of the median income; however, deed restriction of these lots is not proposed; b. Two commercial lots, totaling 1.849 acres, are intended for development of a community services building by a newly formed nonprofit, the Estes Valley Non Profit Resource Center, Inc., and development of a building for the Salud Family Health Center. Salud plans on relocating from the Aspenwood Professionals Condominiums; and c. Approximately 2.3 acres of right-of-way will also be dedicated and a new road constructed to serve the subdivision. The road is proposed to connect to Red Tail Hawk Drive to the north and Crabapple Lane to the south. Thirty-three lots were proposed during Planning Commission review, rather than the thirty- two proposed now. Three "0" Office lots were proposed on 1.85 acres, rather than the two lots proposed now on the same acreage. Also during Planning Commission review, fifteen of the lots were proposed to be deed restricted to households earning 120 percent of less of median income. This was not proposed during Community Development Committee review of the fee waiver request. These are not significant changes that affect the review. One house design is proposed for all thirty new homes. House placement on the lot, house color, and garage location (attached vs. detached) will vary throughout the subdivision. The Page 2 of 4 proposed houses will be one-story, 1,200-square-foot dwellings with full basements, three bedrooms, two baths, and two-car garages. Concerns were expressed by some Vista Ridge pfoperty owners and residents on Wildfire Lane about increased traffic on Crabapple Lane and Wildfire Road. Staff and the Planning Commission is supportive of the Gray Hawk Lane/Crabapple Lane road connection. Road connection to Crabapple Lane was planned with the platting of the Vista Ridge subdivision to provide an interconnected street system. At the May 17, 2005 meeting, the Estes Valley Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the preliminary plat application with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. The vote was not unanimous. There was one vote against, two absent, and one abstention. Development Agreement The applicant has submitted a development agreement for Town Board review, which includes the following waivers/ modifications to the Estes Valley Development Code: 1. Modification of the "R-1" Single-Family Residential zoning district attainable housing requirements. Owner-occupied attainable housing is required to be sold to households earning eighty percent or less of median income and deed restricted for a twenty-year period. This is a proposal to sell fifty percent of the homes to households earning one- hundred percent or less of median income and to deed restrict the homes for a twenty- year period. 2. Waiver of the fifteen percent open space requirement. This was also waived for the Mangelsen Subdivision on Halbach Lane, which includes "R-1" zoned lots. Staff will recommend removing the "R-1" open space requirement from the EVDC. These waivers were discussed with the Community Development Committee at their April 7, 2005 meeting. The Committee was supportive of the general proposal, including these proposed waivers/modifications; however, no action was taken at that meeting. Staff is also supportive of these waivers. Budget. At the April 12, 2005 meeting, Town Board waived application fees for the annexation, rezoning, development agreement, preliminary plat, and final plat applications. Fees were also waived for the future submittal of a development plan for the proposed "0" Office lots. These fees totaled approximately $10,500. At the same meeting, Town Board also waived building permit application fees for the fifteen proposed, deed-restricted, "R-1" Residential lots. These fees totaled approximately $30,000 to $35,000. Staff anticipates submittal of a building permit fee waiver request for buildings on the proposed "0" office lots also. Page 3 of 4 Action. 1. Annexation Compliance with the May 26,2005 letter from Marilyn Conley, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. The dedication statement shall be revised to annex land into the Town of Estes Park rather than subdivide land. 2. Rezoning Approval with the findings and conditions recommehded by Planning Commission. Rezoning shall not become effective until The Neighborhood subdivision plat is recorded. 3. Development Agreement None. The final development agreement will be placed on the Town Board agenda with the final subdivision plat application. 4. Preliminary Plat Â· Approval with the findings and conditions recommended by Planning Commission, with the exception that 15 residential lots will not be deed restricted for twenty-years and sold to households earhing 120 percent of less or Larimer County median income. The deed restriction should be submitted with the final plat application and the deed restriction should be approved prior to Town recordation of the final plat. 4 Page 4 of 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 15-05 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-110, C.R.S., hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the following described area, that the requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12- 104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., have been met; that an election is not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the annexation. The area eligible for annexation known as "BOSAN ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park is as follows: A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, T5N, R72W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE Wl/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS MONUMENTED BY A BLM BRASS CAPPED PIPE AND WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN BEING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4 CONSIDERED AS BEARING N01Â°31'28"E; THENCE N01Â°31'28"E A DISTANCE OF 627.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE S89Â°55'59"E A DISTANCE OF 1,684.37 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION AND THE NORTH LINE OF VISTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION; THENCE S89Â°59'14"E ALONG THE NORTH LINE VISTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 177.08 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRY GULCH ROAD; THENCE N12Â°40'57"W A DISTANCE OF 242.02 FEET ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE N89Â°54'48"W A DISTANCE OF 1,802.06 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF GOOD SAMARITAN SUBDIVISION TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4; THENCE S01Â°31'28"W A DISTANCE OF 236.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 9.946 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. DATED this day of ,2005. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 9-05 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS BOSAN ADDITION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a Patition for Annexation, together with four (4) copies of the plat of said area as required by law, was filed with the Board of Trustees on the gth day of May 1 2005 by the landowners of one hundred percent (100%) of the area and owning one hundred percent (100%) of the area, excluding public streets and alleys of the area hereinafter described, The Board, by Resolution at its regular meeting on the 24~h day of Mav , 2005, accepted said Petition and found and determined that the provisions of Section 31-12-107(1), C.R.S., were met; and the Board further determined that the Town Board should consider the annexation plat on Tuesday, June 28 , 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Building for the purposes of determining that the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C. R.S., and is considered eligible for annexation. Section 2. That the Notice of said hearing was given and published as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S. Section 3. That the hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-12- 109, C.R.S., on the 2801 day of June ,2005. Section 4. That following said hearing, the Board of Trustees adopted a Resolution determining that the proposed annexation met the requirements of the applicable parts of Sections .31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S.; that an election was not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms or conditions are to be imposed upon said annexation. Section 5. That the annexation of the following described area designated as BOSAN ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, is hereby approved: A PORTION OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 20, T5N, R72W OF THE 6TH P.M., LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE Wl/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 AS MONUMENTED BY A BLM BRASS CAPPED PIPE AND WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN BEING RELATIVE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4 CONSIDERED AS BEARING N01Â°31'28"E; THENCE N01Â°31'28"E A DISTANCE OF 627.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE S89Â°55'59"E A DISTANCE OF 1,684.37 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE HILLERY PARRACK EXEMPTION AND THE NORTH LINE OF VISTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION; THENCE S89Â°59'14"E ALONG THE NORTH LINE VISTA RIDGE SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 177.08 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DRY GULCH ROAD; THENCE N12Â°40'57"W A DISTANCE OF 242.02 FEET ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE N89Â°54'48"W A DISTANCE OF 1,802.06 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF GOOD SAMARITAN SUBDIVISION TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NW1/4; THENCE S01Â°31'28"W A DISTANCE OF 236.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 9.946 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Section 6. The Town of Estes Park, Colorado, hereby consents, pursuant to Section 37-45-126(3.6) C.R.S., to the inclusion of lands described above into the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal SubDistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TQWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2005. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2005 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2005, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Town Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 10-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REZONE BOSAN ADDITION WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended rezoning of The Neighborhood Subdivision, Bosan Addition from RE-Rural Estate to Rl - Residential (5.7 acl and O-Office (1.85 ac.); and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town that the recommended zoning changes be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: The zoning for Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, and Lots 1 through 22, Block 2, Bosan Addition, Town of Estes Park, Colorado, shall be changed from RE- Rural Estate to Rl -Residential (7.75 ac.), and the zoning for Lots 1 and 2 Block 3, Bosan Addition, Town of Estes Park, Colorado, shall be changed from RE-Rural Estate to 0-Office (1.85 acl as said lots are depicted on The Neighborhood Subdivision Plat. The rezoning effective date shall be upon recordation of the subdivision plat. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2005. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2005 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park; Colorado, on the day of , 2005, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Administration r Memo To: Mayor Baudek and Town Trustees From: Randy Repola ~~ Date: 6/21/2005 Re: Status Report 2004-06 Town Board Goals Background: The Town Board's 2004-2006 goals are now approximately one year old and at various stages of developmen#completion. I will provide a brief presentation of the status of each goal at the June 28, 2005 board meeting. Goals will also be part of the June 30th retreat involving Trustees and Department Heads. Budget. There are no new budget issues related to these goals. Action: No action required. 1 Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees Goals 2004-2006 Status Report - June 28,2005 2004-2006 Goals . Develop an economic vision which recognizes and supports the existing economic component of tourism; looks at future opportunities for diversity; and creates an overriding plan or strategy for future econoinic development. - Status â€¢ Researched other mountain towns - Breckenridge, Silverthorne, Frisco . Reviewed relevant sections of Comprehensive Plan â€¢ Sought Proposals for development of economic development strategy . Selected RRC - Contract approval sought at 6/28 Board meeting - Team Leader: Randy Repola U. 1 2004-2006 Goals e Create a master facility and land use plan. - Develop a set of criteria for use of Coininunity Reinvestment funds. â€¢ Developed list of facility & capital projects â€¢ Retained Black & Veatch consulting to develop financial plan - Plan developed based upon priorities - Financial plan created for General and Community Reinvestment Funds - Develop target fund balances â€¢ Plan completed and delivered to Town Board June 28,2005 - Team Leader: Bill Linnane IN!] 2004-2006 Goals ' Successful evolution of the CVB, and reinvestment in rehabilitation and renovation of the visitor center. - Selected Visitor Center Architect - Toured other facilities - Finalized Building Plans ' - General Contractor -Hired - Construction Contract signed June 27,2005 ' Team Leader: Tom Pickering IMU 2 2004-2006 Goals . Continue EPURA for a new term beginning in 2008 as a planning and implementation tool for community improvement and economic enhancement. - Team has met with Town and EPURA Attorneys - Timelines for taking action under consideration â€¢ Timing may impact funding - EPURA staff to identify potential future projects - - No further action anticipated until August 2005 ~ â€¢ Team Leader: Randy Repola IMU 2004-2006 Goals e Prioritize implementation plans for transportation and parking improvements. - Explore transit options . Tentative shuttle project summer 2006 - Increased Bighorn Drive parking - Cleave Street redesign ' Team Leader: Bill Linnane !MU 3 2004-2006 Goals â€¢ Create a Stanley Park (improvement) implementation plan. - Firm selected to create master plan - Interviews conducted with area residents, customers and staff - Master plan adopted April 2005 - Improvements to begin October 2005 e Team Leader: Tom - 2004-2006 Goals ' Finalize feasibility options for building a performing and visual arts center. - Original plan deemed too costly (losses of $250K min) - Considered options ' Smaller facility, same location e Shared facility with High School â€¢ CACEP proposal ' Private/Public venture - - Lot 4 Stanley Addition 4 2004-2006 Goals . Finalize feasibility options for building a performing and visual arts center. - Lot 4 e Evaluate options for use of Lot 4 o RFP to Town Board in July 2005 - Team Leader: Randy Repola 5 Administration Memo To: Mayor Baudek and Town Trustees From: Randy Repola ~ Date: 6/21/2005 Re: Economic Development Consultant Proposal Background: One of the Town Board's current goals is the development of an Economic Development Strategy. The Team . (Trustees Jeffrey-Clark and Pinkham) assigned to this goal has determined that it is necessary to retain the services of an economic development and research firm to complete the drafting of a strategy for the Town. Therefore, the Team solicited proposals for this service. Four proposals were received ranging in price from $18,000 to $95,000. The Team selected RRC of Boulder and has since met with them to discuss and refine the scope of work. RRC has performed other work for the Town, specifically the annual advertising conversion study. Staff has been impressed with past work product from RRC. Additionally, the existing relationship provides RRC with a good background from which to conduct this work. The attached proposal includes two optional studies, a "Second Homeowners Survey" and a "Lodge Properties Survey/Data Reporting" piece. The Team is not recommending these components at this time, but may consider them at a later date if they are deemed necessary. Budget The cost per RRC's Scope of Work is not to exceed $24,000. This item was not anticipated in the 2005 budget; however, there is $20,000 for a compensation study in the Administration Budget that will not be conducted until 2006. In addition, staffing costs in Administration are down this year and will adequately cover the additional $4,000. Action: Staff requests approval of the RRC proposal in an amount not to exceed $24,000. j 1 WORK PROGRAM TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION To begin the project EPS and RRC will meet with staff and members of the Economic Development Project Team to review the work program and clarify responsibilities. We will also use the opportunity to gain an understanding of specific issues within the community that are driving the study. In addition, we will review past studies that may be relevant to this work program and will attempt to consider and build upon past efforts. These studies, coupled with other available demographic data, will form a base of information that will be combined with economic data in Task 2. TASK 2: MARKET AND FISCAL ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION OF INPUTS In the following tasks, the team will identify a range of fiscal and market inputs to be used in a larger evaluation of trends. The scope of work focuses on data collection in categories of importance to the Town. The scope does not involve extensive fiscal or market model development but rather approaches the issues with simple, direct data collection and synthesis. 1 In general, the data will primarily consist of time-series information to document how current performance compares to historical standards. Additionally, the team will use the data to compare Estes Park to similar Colorado communities as well as other national park gateway communities. The data analysis will be provided in simple charts that can be used in public meetings, with the intent to make the analysis as transparent (i.e., easily understood and without hidden calculations) as possible and to enable community members to apply the findings in the public process. Task 2.1: Fiscal Conditions The team will provide general assessment of the Town's fiscal conditions, emphasizing key factors for the analysis. The goal is to understand the impacts from various economic sectors on the Town's fiscal conditions and estimate likely changes in the near future based on changes to community demographics and market conditions. Steps will include: â€¢ Summarize the Town budget. â€¢ Quantify the status of each Town fund including typical municipal funds as well as those involved with economic development efforts, such as the convention bureau's fund. â€¢ Identify significant revenues and expenditures. â€¢ Track trends in major revenue and expenditure categories for past five years. â€¢ Correlate these fiscal trends to demographic and market conditions, as further described 1 below. RRC ASSOCIATES & ECONOMIC PLANNING SYSTEMS 1 ESTES PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK Task 2.2: Retail and Lodging Market Conditions Much of the local economy is driven by the retail and lodging sectors. The team will identify relevant data points to assess the strength of the local economy in these sectors. These will be used for a comparative analysis with two to three comparable Colorado communities (Durango, Glenwood Springs, and Grand Lake) and one or two national park gateway communities (to be determined by the client). â€¢ Document total retail square footage, number of stores, type of stores, and balance of local and visitor market niches. â€¢ Evaluate sales volume and sales rate per square foot using Town sales tax data. (Note: we will suppress data that could potentially identify individual store operating characteristics, requiring a minimum of three businesses per category.) â€¢ Compare sales rates per square foot over the past five years, based on sales tax data and retail inventory data. â€¢ Summarize lodging conditions, including total room inventory, occupancy rate by month, seasonality, guest per capita expenditure, historical growth (or decline) in occupancy rates by month. â€¢ Quantify employment growth over past five years at the county level. â€¢ Describe seasonality in ES202 employment levels by sector. â€¢ Summarize retail market conditions for comparable cities. Provide composition of retail nix, composition of local/visitor market niche, total square footage, sales per square foot and seasonality. Provide five-year historical trend data where possible. â€¢ Review published literature on comparable national park gateway communities and summarize salient findings. , â€¢ Summarize lodging conditions for comparable communities. Specify number of rooms, occupancy rate, seasonality, guest per capita expenditure, and trend data. Task 2.3: Overall Development Trends, Land Values, Appreciation Rates, and Redevelopment Potential .. Representatives from the Town report that trends in real estate development have reached a new threshold and could generate a new set of impacts not previously anticipated by town officials. Examples include the potential for developers to generate greater returns by converting commercial uses to residential and the trend of commercial rental rates outpacing sales growth and threatening merchant viability. As the community moves forward, it will need to adjust policy to address these and other macro real estate trends, depending on the magnitude of market changes. â€¢ Document growth rates of new development quantifying annual square feet of construction by use and annual rate of residential development by type of unit. â€¢ Document rental rates for downtown merchants and quantify historic trends. RRC ASSOCIATES & ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS. 2 ESTES PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK m Quantify appreciation rates for residential and commercial property. â€¢ Develop case studies of potential redevelopment sites to estimate magnitude of trends. TASK 3: EVALUATION OF ESTES PARK MARKEL FISCAL, AND FUNDING POSITION The team will use the demographic baseline analysis of the community provided in Task 1 in conjunction with the economic data collected in Task 2 to identify the significant correlations between demographic changes, development trends, economic health, and fiscal strength. The purpose is to identify the most influential factors, apply projections from previous municipal studies, then estimate future market and fiscal conditions. The challenge with this task is to compare trends that cover the breadth of topics identified above to identify the factors most likely to influence future conditions and develop a foundation for public policy decisions. As part of the analysis, the team will evaluate existing sources of public revenue, specifically dedicated revenue streams such as TIF's, BID's, lodging tax, etc. The purpose is to assess performance and identify opportunities to expand revenue sources. I Evaluate relationships and document trends, emphasizing order of magnitude relationships, i.e., for each five percent of housing inventory that converts to second home ownership, there is likely to be an xx percent increase (or decrease) in sales tax revenue. â€¢ Estimate impacts from population changes and percentage of second home ownership on fiscal revenues and expenditures. j â€¢ Evaluate fiscal strength relative to lodging capacity, occupancy rates, park visitation, etc. â€¢ Document relationship between the growth in retail inventory and changes in sales per square foot to estimate retail expansion potential and depth of retail demand. I Evaluate performance of Estes Park against peer communities to identify areas of strength as well as areas needing to be changed. â€¢ Review current revenue streams related to economic development. â€¢ Summarize funding characteristics, such as annual revenue, terms of program, years of remaining funding, debt service, etc. â€¢ Provide overview of potential public financing opportunities. TASK 4: AMENITIES AND ENHANCEMENTS As a part of the public participation process, and using experience and judgment from other projects and settings, our team will identify amenities and enhancements to the local infrastructure that would improve Estes Park's attractiveness as a tourist destination. We also note that we may identify improvements that would benefit other segments of the business community beyond tourism (for example, technology that would improve the opportunities for "lone eagles" or business travelers, etc.). RRC ASSOCIATES & ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS 3 ESTES PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECr SCOPE OF WORK TASK 5: EVALUATION OF THE BEST USE OF TOWN LAND Our team will analyze the potential use of Town-owned land to meet economic development objectives. We can conduct a preliminary review of development parcels to determine those with highest potential for economic development uses, based on factors including size, location, demand for other purposes, visibility, etc. Then, we can evaluate market demand to determine the highest and best uses for specific sites, accounting for civic priorities as well as market feasibility. TASK 6: GOALS AND INCENTIVES Our analysis takes into account emerging economic trends that affect the economic relationships within and betweenthe various sectors under consideration. The assessment of market fiscal and funding position, and the evaluation of Town-owned development parcels will establish an analytical and policy framework for determining economic development goals, objectives, and identifying policies and incentives. Our team will recommend strategies, a corresponding action plan, and potential revisions to existing Town policy documents to achieve the identified goals and objectives. Representatives of RRC and EPS will work with Town staff and other key stakeholders to ensure that the recommendations are compatible with local goals and concerns. TASK 7: PUBLIC MEETINGS Our team anticipates conducting a total of three public meetings as well as two "adoptive" meetings with town bodies. Following each of the public meetings, we will be available to meet in small groups or one-on-one to ensure that conununity members digest the data and use it to make informed decisions in the public process. We have assumed that each meeting will require nine to ten hours, which includes one hour for preparation, two hours for travel time, three hours for an evening meeting followed by two hours of a morning conununity debrief, plus one hour for summarizing the direction provided. The components can be adjusted for each meeting, potentially decreasing costs. Typically we will have two team representatives present at each of the three meetings. We propose that the public meetings be scheduled in two-day blocks in September and October. Typically we will hold an afternoon or evening meeting followed by a breakfast or "open hours" session the following morning permitting drop-in inquiries from the public. We will work with Town officials to schedule these meetings over a six- to eight-week period. The final adoption meetings would then follow within several weeks of the public meetings. RRC ASSOCIATES & ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS Â· 4 ESTES PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK OPTIONAL COMPONENTS Second Homeowners Survey The potential to conduct a mail survey with second home owners is identified as an optional component of the work program. This survey would include a postage-paid return envelope. It would probe a variety of topics that are important to Estes Park's economic planning including: intention by second home owners to retire full-time in the town (i.e., long-term use of residence), frequency of visitation, economic patterns (i.e., expenditures while in town for things such as household furnishings and improvements), and opinions on various topics related to the Plan and Town policies. Lodge Property Survey This survey would involve data collection and reporting by lodging properties on anticipated bookings. Our team would assist in establishing this program with the idea that it might become locally administered over time. (Note, however, that we have often found that communities value having a third party to conduct these types of efforts where sensitive competitive information is involved.) We would design survey (data collection) forms, train properties in the use of forms, assist in creating a reporting system, and implement reporting for an agreed-upon time period. BUDGET SUMMARY The following illustrates the budget for the components of the work program. COMPONENT ESTIMATED COST TASK 1 Project Initiation and Data Collection $1,500 TASK 2 Market and Fiscal Analysis and Identification of Inputs $3,000 TASK 3 Evaluation of Estes Park Market, Fiscal and Funding Positions $4,000 TASK 4 Identify Amenities and Enhancements $1,500 TASK 5 A General Evaluation of the Best Use of Town Land $1,000 TASK 6 Identification of Goals, Objectives and Incentives $4,000 TASK 7 Public Involvement: 3 public meetinlfs, 2 adoptive meetings $9,000 Optional Second Homeowners Survey $6,500-8,000 1 Optional Lodge Properties Survey/Data Reporting $5,000-8,000 RRC ASSOCIATES & ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS 5 July 8,2004 j PROCEDURE FOR TRANSFER OF LIQUOR LICENSE TOWN CLERK. Will present the application and confirm the following: E The application was filed June 10, 2005 E The Town has received all necessary fees and hearing costs. 9 The applicant is filing as a Corporation 0 There is a police report with regard to the investigation of the applicant. C Status of TIP.S. Training: X Unscheduled Scheduled Completed MOTION: 1 Move the Transfer Application filed by DCALS Enterprises, Inc. , doing business as LONIGANS SALOON NIGHTCLUB & GRILL for a Tavern License be approved/denied. TOWN OF ESTES PARK // eed- w ZAA JA Police Department Â£--4/'11$ Â¥/2 ~~ Â· 75/,2,/24*v *635*49".I a.* .34 foat -.96.*35:0/t#%(WAMI-ef *- 1,Wng#NCE#41;"19.u-5/6&Y--rÂ·~> . -0 44 ,+LaSKY'*01)16+AX$jfggi,MA. -4*77-/ râ„¢.9.4*26*Fc,38Â®Â¥*gfto.. v...- 0Â·~1 ~,LU F , ..4~~4wi#13, fer r 374#-*,tate~ 2 -4Â».kruu, :Â«4.99.fly - .p-r~'y 78%'- X W, P 7 ~20*9-64 , 1 A -AN June 21,2005 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: DCALS ENTERPRISES, INC. (d.b.a, Lonigan's Saloon Nightclub & Grill) Tavern Callahan, David L. DOB: 11/24/51 Callahan, Deborah C. DOB: 04/14/51 Dear Mrs. O'Connor: A check of the Estes Park Police Department local records on the above-named persons and business was conducted. There was no activity reported on the individuals or business for the previous year. Sincerely, ,0-365Â¢- Â£:5>'Lowell c. RicMrdson Chie#bf~Mi~ce, Estes Park Police Department (970) 586-4465 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (970) 586-4496 DR 8404 (10/28/04) Page 1 21 DEPARTMENT USE ONLY COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENPORCEMENT DIVISION DENVER C080261 COLORADO LIQUOR RETAIL LICENSE APPLICATION 3 U NEW LICENSE XETRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP D LICENSE RENEWAL â€¢ ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN â€¢ APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) Â· LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ Â· APPLICANT SHOULD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COLORADO LIQUOR AND BEER CODE(Call 303-370-2165) 1. Applicant is applying as a Â· m Individual g Corporation D Limited Liability Company j Partnership (includes Limited Liability and Husband and Wife Partnerships) D Association or Other 2. ADplicant If an LLC na DCA 6-5 *271:~ ~%,3%;77'2~e;st 2 partner's names; if corporation, name of corporation Fein Number -2.0-2,% 5096/ 2a.TradeÂ·Name of Establishment (DBA) Â· State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone L.on Iqans saloon A,461-cfol + drill 42-0969 4 970 Â· 586: Â¥3Â¥6 3. Address of P~mises (specif eyct jocation ofpremises) 110 Wet dl K horn /Avenue City - , County .State ~ ZIP Col= ' Estes +3/2 1-44 1.tr- 60 -go.517 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) Citpr Top'n State ZIP Code 72 0. 6% 3331 esteâ‚¬ Perk Co 96 517 5. If the premises currently have a li4uor or beer license, you MUST answer the following questions: Present Trade N,me of Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Class of License Present Gxpir*ion Date 1-00'9005 i wc- 03Â· 39523Â·Odia 73/E,ed 4/1 /06 *fAMi:x2.p'SECItiONIA *'--Â· ND.NREFUNDABLE-APPLICATIO}*FEES , '4?LIAB Â·.Â·:SECTION B (CONT,). ' c --:LÂ·-Â· Â·rpi--,MLIQUOR LICENSE.FEES. ff 2300 0 Application Fee for New License .......... $825.00 1985-Resort Complex License (City) ................................. $500.00 ')302' D Application Fee for New License - .1986 Z Resort Complex License (County)............................ $500.00 w/Concurrent Review ............................................... $925 00 1988 - Add Related Facility to Resort Complex....$ 75.00 X Total _ 2310 73~.Application Fee for Transfer . $825.00 1990 _ Club License (City) $308.75 2312 m Application Fee for Transfer - 1991 - Club License (County) .......................:.- $308.75 'w/Concurrent Review..........,..,,.,..,...,,,,............,,.....,,.,.. $925,00 2010:*ravern License (City)..,,....,.....,..,,....,,,._ $500.00 LIAB I )'' Â§ECT-lebEB D?Â·f'=:,2.7-Â·-tÂ· -4 -'.2.19*:EIQOOR:1=ICEN@EME&59 2011. Z Tavern License (County) $500.00 1905 0 Retail Gaming Tavern License (City) ............................ $500.00 2012 _ Manager Registration - Tavern........... $ 75.00 1906 El Retail Gaming Tavern License (County)....................... $500.00 2020 - Arts License (City) .................................... $308.75 1940 U Retail Liquor Store License (City) ................................. $227.50 2021 Z Arts License (County) $308.75 1941 ~ Retail Liquor Store License (County) .....,..................,... $312.50 2030 Z Racback License (City) .......................... $500.00 1950 0 Â· Liquor Licensed Drugstore (City) ................................ $227.50 2031 _ Racetrack License (County) ..................... $500.00 1951 gl Liquor Licensed Drugstore (County) ,,.,,,:,,,..,..,,,........,., $312.50 2040 - Optional Premises License (City) $500.00 1960 0 Beer and Wine License (City) .. $351.25 2041 _ Optional Premises License (County) ........ $500.00 1961 U Beer and Wine License (County).................................. $436.25 2045 _ Vintners Restaurant License (City)........... $750.00 2046 Vintners Restaurant License (County)...... $750.00 1970 U Hotel and Restaurant License (City) ............................. $500.00 = 1971 [] Hotel and Restaurant License (County)........................ $500.00 2220 _ Add Optional Premises to H&R .............. $100.00 X Total _ 1975 0 Brew Pub License (City) $750.00 2370 2 Master File Location.Fee .......................... $ 25.00 X Total _ 1976 0 Brew Pub License (County) $750.00 2375 3 Master File Background............................ $250.00 X Total 1980 0 Hotel and Restaurant License w/opt premises (City) .... $500.00 1981 ~ Hotel and Restaurant License w/opt premises (County) $500.00 1983 El Manager Registration-H& R....................................... $ 75.00 DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY LIABILITy INFORMATION License Issued Through County City Industry Type License Account.Number Liability Date (Expiration Date) FROM TO State City County Managers Reg i -750 (999) 2180-100 (999) 2190-100 (999) -750 (999) Cash Fund New License Cash Fund Transter LIcense TOTAL 2300-100 2310-100 (999) (999) $ . DR 8404 (10/28/04) Page 3 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stock- Â· ,~ ~ | holders or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation) or manager ever (in Colorado or any other state); (a) been denied an alcohol beverage license? 0,K (b) had an alcohol beyerage license suspended or revoked?~ , Â· . Â£008 (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcohol beverage license suspended or.revoked? If you answered yes 16 7a, b or c,.explain in detail on a'separate sheet. 8. Has a liquor-license application (same license class), that was located within 500 feet of the proposedÂ·premises,Â·been denied Â·withinÂ·the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. El EK 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or private school that meets compulsory education requirements Â¢ mvi Colorado law, or the principal campus of any college, university or seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any b M current or former financial interest in said business induding-any loans to or from a licensee. 11, Does the Applicant, as listed on line 2 of this application, have legal possession ofthe premises.for at reast l yearfrom the date that this license will be issued by virtue of ownershiR, lease or other arrangement? El Ownership 11% .tease O Other (Explain in DRâ„¢il) - - Â·Â· Â· Â· Â· Â¥ d a. If leased, fist name of landlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: apKon renÂ¢w +0 2014 Landlord Robert 6. Biller Tenant DCALS Enterpnses, Inc . Expires APPRopo, Inc. pres*rUM thu'tl Â¢ hebbit â‚¬01(4~avi /2.-31-2605 Attach a diagram andÂ· outline or designate the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, brewery, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room sh'all-be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11'. (Doesn't have ~ to be to scale) 12. Who, besides the owners listed in this application (including persons,.firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies), will loan or give money, inventory, furniture.or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME DATE OF BIRTH FEIN OR SSN INTEREST NOME /., 1 / N/lor Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement, or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc.) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establidhrnent, and any agreement relating to the business Which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises .Yes No Has a local ordinance or resolution authorizing optional premises been adopted? 0/Â¢K Number of separate Optional Premises areas reqi IA<ter| (See License Fee Chart) 14. Liqu6r Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer theÂ·following: (a) Does the applicantfor a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Yes No Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. Â· ~ O ~ 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach: (a) Is the applicant organization operatedsolely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and D ~~ not for pecuniary gain? (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is Â· UK operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant ockupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? (Three years required) 16. Brew-Pub License or Vintner Restaurant Applicants answer the following: (a) Has the applicant received or applied for a Federal Permit? O% (Copy of permit or application must be attached) Date of Birth 17a. Name of Manager (for allon-premises applicants) bow i A L. ...=.=Im=. (1 Idian this is an 11- 2-4-57 application for a Hotel, Restaurant or Tavern License, the manager must also submit an Individual History Record (DR 8404-11 -a*z**==44 17b. Does this manager act as the manager of, or have a financial interest in, any other liquor Yes N, licensad establishment in the State of Colorado? If yes, provide name, type of license and account number. U DE 18. Tax Distraint Information. Does the applicant or any other person listed on this application and including its partners, officers, Yes No directors, stockholders, members (LLC) or managing members (LLC) and any other persons with a 10% or greater financial interest in the applicant currently have an outstanding tax distraint issued to them by the Colorado Department bf Revenue? !f yes, provide an explanation and include copies of any payment agreements. 08 8404 (10/28/04) Page 4 â€¢ 19. If applicant is a corporation, partnership, association or limited liability company, applicant must list ALL OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, GENERAL PARTNERS, AND MANAGING MEMBERS. In addition applicant must list any stockholders, partners, or members with OWNER- SHIP OF 10% OR MORE IN THE APPLICANT. ALL PERSONS LISTED BELOW must also attach form DR 8404-1 (Individual History record), and submit finger print cards to their tocal licensing authority. NAME HOME ADDRESS CITY 4STATE DOB POSITION % OWNED* )510 Raven Ct, Unit D, 145.50% 3343 Dad. L. Ca ((a 6an â‚¬5 +25 'Ar rk . 60 %0517 1 1-14Â·51 Res, 4# 50% /5-/D ga vet Ct. U.â€¢; + D, P. 0, Sd R 33 58 Vice , I ~berah 6 (3//6 640 65#5 Park; 00 15517 04Â·14 Â·s\ 71.~toe,a- 66*l. *If total ownership percentage disclosed here does not total 100% applicant must check this box E Applican.t affirms that no individual other than these disclosed herein, owns 10% or more of the applicant Additional Documents to be submitted by type of entity ~~CORPORATION ,~Cert. of Illcorp. U Cert. of Good Standing (i~ morethan 2 yrs. old) . . El Cert. of Auth. (ifaforeign corp.) ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ Partnership Agreement (General or Limited) - ~j Husband and Wife partriership (no written agreement) j LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY I~ Articles of Organization U Cert. of Authority (if foreign company) U Operating Agrmt. ~ ASSOCIATION OR OTHER Attach copy of agreements creating association or relationship between the parties Registered Agent (if applicable) Address for Service W ..6 %DN.j.'~9-q-s 4* - -~-,-~; Vi ;, >/.' L~,-,51.OATHOEtÂ·ARÂ¢;L:!CANT~.I...Â· 4.r :L,-~Â·; ' 'Â·Â·-7K.4,*;ill:*19:Iie+.IÂ·.s' '~.'-:5i* ~.. 3*[ deEfar@ liti42.petia[ty of peridry.in~*th'Q- socbnddegr44.4ift this'kppliE*johand a[14tth-cifm@ts-are,f?0%.%448&f~-nd co41etq itd)hibest of my-.knOwledge.. 1 klso- ack.riow}48[ge,thatitigfmy'k~dp@nsibilithand the responflibility 'dt.-At*686tskbil eh~plbYees .: f.4~44,72; )30-cortlply~th@ pe.visions'of.the Cgloratio Ubioor*or'Â·B@er.,Coti@I'Which affect.my licertsÂ©:- 947.-I:*32Â·~.i-t....titi--tipi. F.~4.-, , *th@+d Sig*Ith /1 d Title Date ,/ / PRâ‚¬%{DENT- (0 1,6/ Â«s- Â·Â·' ~4,32{i *,.4 RE-'56RT.AN-D APPROVAL .OF LOC:XL=Â·LICiENSING <AUIHORITÂ¥,icifY/800â€¢iTY) f. :j 4-47:f: 6 Date application filed with local authority Date of local authority hearing (for new license applicants; cannot be less than 30 days from date of application 12-47-311 (1)) C.R.S. THE LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY HEREBY AFFIRMS: That each person required to file.DR 8404-1 (Individual History Record) has: .. Â·' Â· Yes No 0 Been fingerprinted O Been subject to background investigation, including NCIC/CCIC check for outstanding warrants That the local authority has conducted, or intends to conduct, an inspection of the proposed premises to ensure that the applicant is in r compliance with, and aware of, liquor code provisions affecting their class of license 0 0 (Check One) C Date of Inspection or Anticipated Date O Upon approval of state licdnsing authority. The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report thatsuch license, if granted, will meetthe reasoAable rqquirements.of the neighborhood and thedesires of theadult inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions df Title 12, Articte 46 or 47, C.R,S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority for Telephone Number U TOWN,Â·CITY Â£ COUNTY Jignature Title Date Signature (attest) Title Date DR 840411 (06/02) MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY , COIJORADO DEPARTMENTOF REVENUE ' ' LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION . 1. , INDIVIDUAL FINGERPRINT Â· 1881 PIERCE STREET RM 108A - CARDS OBTAINED FROM THE DENVER CO 80261 POLICE DEPARTMENT INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) , 'of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation-; -all limited liability company MANAG/NG members, Officers or other..limited liAbility compahy members. with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant orÂ·aÂ·Tavern License. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authority investigation. All questions.must be answered in their entirety or your application may be delayed or not processed. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood or omission will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business DcALS Evtterpises, Inc.- dba: l.ov,ijans- Salon /U/444/66 4 6,;// 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. List any other names you hateÂ·used. CALLAA-Ad , bAV,5 - Lo KEN)5 ' . t .i .... 2,2 k/~4 ... 4. Mailing address (if diff@rent from-residence) ,- ., Home lelephooe.'. ~.. Â· Ro, -be>Â£ 33434- Estes Apkrk<CO,80617 970- 5Â¥7-0357 5. List all residence addresses below Include current and previous addresses for the past five years. STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO Current 1510 Ravevt Coort; Unit-D Esl-es park Co. Et)517 . Gbi65.. prfWAI' . i Previous , ', - ~' '' 2.-2.06 (blacoerse Lant . - Res 1-ant VA '20(qi# ' 6/3114 523Â¢0 5- 1 h 4-' . I .4, , 6. Date bf. Birth ~ Social Security Number (SSN) -Â· Â· Place.of Birth 7. U.Â·S. Citizeh? Â· * 11- 2.4-5-1 . 2-\4.-6-41*6111.- .Abinjtllri i -PA < MIYes n No , If Naturalized, state yhere. ~ When ' Name of District Court -,74 - Naturalization Certificate Number .Date of Certification ... If ao Alient Give Allen's Registration Card NumberÂ· Permanent Residence<'Card NumberÂ· - 8. Height Weight-Â·Â· Â·Hair Color Eye ColorÂ©SmÂ¢.Â·Race 9. Do,ybu have'a current. Driver's Ucense? If so, giveÂ·number &Â·state . 2 ,. .u U *ES":641 HA-z../Vt WÂ·.~j~*iI{51NT:- .025-\60-"05Â·32- Cou- ' , 10. Lidt the name(s) of rdlatives. working in: or holdipg a Tinanci@ interest in the Co[ofadd alcohol bev'grAge industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU ~ POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER Â¢ ..1 .... ..1 \ A/4 \ 1/ 1 1 . I 11. Have you ever applied for, held, or had an interest in a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture or fixtures, equipment or j invent64'to any liquor or beerlicensee? If yes,Â·answer in detail.- m Yes ~ RIO Â·:Â· 'Â· ~ . 1*2 12. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in crimirial or mjlit*y court or do you have any charges pending? (If yes, explain in detail.) m Yes ~54No 1 . 13. Have you ever received'a Violation notice, suspension or revocation, forl liqubr law violation, or have you applied for or been denied Â·a liquor or beef license anywhere in the U.S.?If yes, explain in' detail. El Yes ;g[No 14. Cistall currdnt and formef Jmploiers orbusinesses Jndaged in within th4 last five years (AttaA sdparate..sheet-if necessarb NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO 10%2.0 (FullÂ¢ard 20. Corperâ€¢1%Â£1, 1 1/1 '+ 4 ArtIA,JI,+ drApkle 51,1os,Inc Sin,e Â·ze -21 6.veâ€¢wl- Â· to/19'79 5110185- Â· A.Andlpal k -Jurt/4,80,- Sal.ee f ' MD' 2070< , ' , 15. Financial Information ; Â· ' ~ ' l. 4. 6 . Total purchase price $ 1-45,000.(if buying an existing business) OR list the total amount bf your investment in the new business, h '- inclcid6ng nOtes, loans, ca,sh, services or equipment, and operating capital.$.4 , 32 5,000Â·, , . N. . . Provide details of Investment. You must account for the sources of ALL cash (how acquired). Attach a separate sheet if needed. Type: Cash, Services or Equipment Where Obtained (Savings, Checking, Account, etc.) Amount Ca5% VAÂ· Hous< S de Proceâ‚¬35 - Chee|'14 1 75,000. I ~aslrl~~Brp-Pe.sio.TransFer Fuelit, 44# Aects- Trust Pla" Anteric<,t *Elpeess {12,4 Aeckb~ c 614.4.. 114-,000Â· o 3 40 00. /t (961 0644-ckâ€¢k ?red i <f Acct. *vx,s j 1 A . 7.1 ... Loan Information (attach copies of all notes or loans) ,Â£ en. didthick AMÂ£e,#u:,uka Name of Lender Address Term Security Amount Ban k of Glo/440 654â‚¬s Park, CO 505,7 8(542 86/~ 5Â©F bus'&43 5251Â©00. 5315 B 5 Thompson Aue a L vehicks 45 b,4+S Dona.\44 Der. tktj~ AllÂ·etl ~51 5Â»0143 Gr. ~)Â¥44(1'41 35)r: 2 9 %: Boire - 30,0<Dos 3534 *Jert-h 3461.544,5+ . Dol)9145 4 Suv'%9 41(43 - ,Â¢r/injhn i VA 11%07 3542 91 +Jo,te - 15>000. 31'44 bernaAeltâ‚¬ 1(lorpl,ulf Bowiâ‚¬, 11/lo 2071 6 3 3,; @ 5% manâ‚¬ /01000. 11.oG A)54-â‚¬Rd Lotâ€¢uâ‚¬- 10. Give name of bank where business account will be maintained; name the account will be maintained under; and the name or names of persons authorized to draw thereon. , fekileon Aliski-dvt Bank o f Colorado; TDCAL5 EMterprises, Inc.-dbq: 1041 44 05 4 607/ Da.vid L. amcl beborah C. Ca-((46 an. . Oath of Applicant I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree thatthis application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best o' my knowledge. / A *uvforized *i06ature / 0/ } t.-k /7 Title A 44 'Â· A-4 /6 - Ot>41 Date / , ~~g#AP- jv~27'L ..Pw;&86 6/,6/o< . 6 DR 8400 (06/02) MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY COLOFUDO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE '' , , Ll Qlb R ENFORCEMENT DIVISION INDIVIDUAL FINGERPRINT 1881,PIERCE STREET RM 108A DENVER CO 80261 ' - CARDS OBTAINED FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT : INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a bartnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) Â·of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock 'of such corporation; all limited liability. company MANAGING members, Officers or other limited liability Company members. 1 with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant or a. Tavern License. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary for theÂ· licensing authority investigation. All questions must be answered in their entirety or your application may be delayed or not processed. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood or omission will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regafding the character of the applicant. ,1. Name of Business Saloon Al 6,/4 4 ID<CALS . Ent-erprises, Iytc. - dbv: Loniflang *gri// 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. List any other natnes you*have used.,/ e ra k Chr, / CALLA HA Â« T-28Â©RA Ht CAAd LE - f ' De]60 rah C.â€¢01 41(.etl'Vl Delk 1>460Â¢064 (41.{ Kessler/ Foreman 4. Mailing address (ifidiffecentÂ·'fromÂ· residence) - , , 1-lorve Telephone ' 20. Be>< 3343, ES#es Park, G. 805\ 7 970-577- 6357 5. List all residence addresses below. Include current and previous addresses for the past five years. STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO Current 1 510- Aven (t Unit b ,â‚¬sles Park,66 msn Â·611)os Preged , PreviousÂ·'Â· /31 + OS 1,306 614 Bcourse Lane ihs ton, VA 20(91 4/3/99 6. Date of Birth . Social Security Number (SSN) Place of Birth. ~. ~ , 7. U. S. Citizen? 04-/4-51 1-19- 58-1~1831 13,;544 \44. ~Â»s m No ' If Naturalized, state Wherg When Name of District Court -Alk- Naturalization Certificate Number Date gf Certification -- If an Alien,.Give Alien.'s Registration Card Number Permanent ResidenceÂ·Cand-Number Â· 8.Height - Weight:Â· Â· Hair Color - 'Eye Color SexÂ· Race 9.:Do you.have @ current-Driver's.Licens,e? If so, give number.&.state -~' 5'1" 165 2320. GRN. F.W KYes in,40. 05.-"/GO -0534. r 10. List the.namets) of relatives working in or holding a financial interest in the Colokado'alcohol beverage industry. e NAME OF RELATIVE ~ RELATIONSHIP TO YOU ' 1 .'POSITION HELD NAMEOF EMPLOYkR - 1 \ 44- j- +.. t.-/ . -0 --h - I i 11. Have you ever applied for, held, or had an interest in a State of Colorado LiquorÂ·or Bger License, or loaned money, furniture or fixtures,. equipment or ) inventory, to any liquor orbeer'licensee? Ifyes, answer in detail.Â· [3Â·Yes I><No 12. Have you ever been con#icted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense..jn. criminal or.millt;,ry. court or do you have any charges pending? (Ifyes, explain in detail.) C]Yes ~~No \ 1 13. Have you ever received:a violation notice, suspension' or revocation, for a liquor laW violation, or have you applied for or been deniedÂ·a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S:? If yes,-Â·explain in detail. . ~ ~ yes J*BIO :' 14. List all current arid former employers or businesses engaged in. within the.last five years (Attach separate- shedt'ifheceisary) i - "NAME:OF EMPEOYERÂ· 1 : 1 . . ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STAT;E, ZIP) POSITION HELD Â· . FR0M TO r r..â‚¬454<WesÂ¥-Park DevS,ite. I,ovsed:r . - | Cor f'Â°cale EX#baks ~1 4 Lean i 1/MÂ· . 22102+ PreledÂ· *Â¥. 3/419} .5.holog 1 1...5 - P % 15.'Firencibl Information. - ' . h . I , ' to U Total purÂ®ase price $ I 1. 4 5, 000 (if buyin~ an existing business) OR list the total+amount of your investnient in the new business, Intiudirig~notes,loans,-tash, seirvites or equipment,hand operating capital S . ~752.5-, O DO.. . ..1 . Â· Â· â€¢ i Â· i,: | Provide details of Investment. You must account for the sources of ALL cash (how acquired). Attach a separate sheet if needed. Type: Cash, Services or Equipment Where Obtained (Savings, Checking, Account, etc.) Amount CASIA |/A. tbousa -542 Froe.dr -cti.c#,5 /45, Co o CL<5L ~ C-corp ..9454$,OF-1-90*24~ F-14#lit, 10LK ass<+S zA=*4' UL{ 4 000 T,-vs-f P { 42 Pe,*.uÂ·lu. â€¢pe-gs =I: 12)4 Â·Ace{C~;7â‚¬56Â¢. 89. o oo A-0 , ' 614 -ablaciAÂ¢ ~tfu*D 1 4 144- U.ds.) . I Loan Information (attach'copies of all notes or loans) 0 - -5Â£,c A.#406,~ A-:1 rez,niâ€¢cu Name of Lender - Address Term ~ Security Amount 533 813 Tlt-f'Â°4 Ave. 6/ .1. p.8,4.S 8414 04 60(orde 15*â€¢s fâ€¢*44 CO irosÂ»19 31'rs 2%/0 Tok Bu.7~;1~ 5.0,000 As 1 5 ,.t , 4 cl vat ns, 31...11 4<De roÂ·{AY: Al/7 #*t57:(Miz,03*t? sy,52 87Â·Mir b,Lite-:- 3*'3,0 .rboi~45 4*.la..7 141[4.t Nul-ow0-(151?Y-M. 37rs, *Co A '014.6 14.000 CS;,0, + 13*fu~Lek indrfl,4 %%,wic, nAA) 620 11 6 3,4 1 7% /14,0.Â£ t,~ 000 16. Give name of bank where business accounf will be maintained; name the account will be mairAained under; and th,-name or names of persons authorized to draw thereon. St.K of- Cdo racÂ¢o j 336 FH-5 Ey,tâ‚¬rprls 65. trne, &66 1 1. 0/,;40,tr 54/4.2,45khlub 4 6411 0_34v-;4--*Â·L. AKeÂ£ CT) JocrÂ®4. C. C$(lal.* FL Oath of Applicant 1 I declare under penalty of perjury in the secdnd degree that this-application and al] attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best o~ my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title ' Date (22.-uLl 8 (21&1~- Ytet 871'egia,e;Et Ellolog