Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board Study Session 2003-10-30.. ' <OWN-Ot\\ TOWN BOARD 2004 BUDGET STUDY SESSIONS Thursday, October 30,2003 Dinner: 6:00 p.m. Meeting: 6:30 p.m. Town Board Room 1. Presentation of the following funds: • General Fund • Community Reinvestment • Museum • Conference Center • Conservation Trust • Special Events • Senior Center • Larimer County Open Space • Park Entrance Estates & Debt Service • Building Authority esday, November 03 nner: 6:00 . :6: .rn. Tow , oom 1. Presentation of the fo ng • Light and Pow • Water • Catastrop oss • Medical rance • Fleet • Veh Replacement • Fi ension • 2 ice Pension • OSH , I 1 4 1*OC 03 . EPURA Revenues and Transfers to and from the Town of Estes Park There are three factors that have caused significant changes in the budgeting of EPURA pledged revenues, and the transfer of excess funds to the Town. First, the EPURA Tax Increment Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 2003 that closed on Monday, October 27, substantially reduced interest expense by achieving a lower average interest rate of less than 3%. Furthermore, the former repayment schedule had sharply increasing principal payments, which caused more interest expense to be incurred over the life of the repayment. (See attachment A) Second, the TABOR amendment also directed that a portion of excess pledged revenues would be transferred to the Town's Community Reinvestment Fund. Recent court rulings have held that URA's are not subject to TABOR, so this transfer is no longer required to be made to the Community Reinvestment Fund. Finally, the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between the Town and EPURA was revised to reflect the new indebtedness. The amended IGA specifies that the pledged revenues retained by EPURA will consist of $200,000 annually for operating expenses, and the amount necessary for annual principal and interest payments on the debt service. The previous IGA required that $600,000 be transferred to EPURA for operations and projects. The reduced amount assumes that the 2003 bond issue will cover project costs for several years, and that $200,000 is ample for operations. The changes in the Town' s budget that result from these factors affect revenue and transfers. In the General Fund, the transfer from EPURA to the Town which was originally budgeted at $974,270 is reduced to zero. This assumes that incremental sales tax is included in the total sales tax revenue amount for the Town. The original budget also included a transfer from EPURA to the Community Reinvestment Fund in the amount of $1,882,283, which was projected to be the required TABOR transfer The transfer out to EPURA from the General Fund was originally budgeted at $2,959,473; the draft budget presents the transfer out at $101,212. The draft budget also includes a tran*fer of $1,300,000 to the Community Reinvestment Fund from the Town's General Fund. (See attachments B & C) The detail below shows the change in cash flows between the Town and EPURA. The amounts under the "Previous" and "Current" headings represent the total amount to be retained and/or transferred to EPURA for annual debt service and operations expense. The current process increases cash flow to the Town by $176,092, and saves $222,922 in interest expense on the refunded portion. The cash flow is improved even though the current debt service is for a principal amount of $4,165,000, while the previous issue only serviced $1,675,000. Previous Current Savings 2004 1,000,000 966,088 33,912 2005 1,050,000 1,029,621 20,379 2006 1.150,000 1,052,301 97,699 2007 1,248,557 1,071,876 176,681 2008 535,000 687,579 (152,579) Total cash flow increase to Town $ 176,092 (2008 shown net o f reserve requirements) Attachment A Lease Payment Schedule Comparison Previous Current Agreement Agreement 2004 $ 400,000 $ 211,182 2005 450,000 217,837 2006 550,000 214,884 2007 648,557 214,766 2008 700,000 217,125 C f 2 or m vo=M 4 - 3 -0 D R% IJ 4@ Eg C 0 0 A 1- .G 0 G u (D > C E < 0 m 22 ED 0 0- = If 0 bud EE ES E 0 o E la ag li li 0 - 4 c = a .c - L W W > 2&22' E 43 &3 co Attachment B: Previous Debt and IGA Increment Sales Tax ~ is returned ope at o s of $600 000, Increme t Property ther excess Tax Je410 pue 1Salelul SenUOADJ Jelueo eOUeJailloo~ WOEIvl Jed enueAe.I EPURA Revenues pay s per EP TABOR calculati luetuied eseel decl pue uogeinoies Town General Fund receives all sales revenues. JolueD OOLJOJOJUOO OXe SOA!0003 Lease i @ 5 . . I I I Attachment C: New Refunding and Revenue Bonds and IGA Increment Sales Tax Town General Fund operations of $200,000. ~ Increment Property ~ budget process. To~n~~t fers net arnount, Tax Conference Center ~ Interest and other SenUDAe] ;Uellfed eseel EPURA Community Reinvestment Revenues pay , ,212 for 2004) receives all sales tax and transfer net amount due to EPURA. Transfer to is determined during Town Communi Reinvestment Fund . eoueialuoo shed aspal Jeluao 1 1 4,mi 1 1 1 1 1 1 gro It 1 1 ri /N 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 /1 It 0 1 1 It 301 1 1 1 01% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 O 1 O 10 1 M . 1 1 mu l 1 1 1 22 1 1 1 1 01 1 1 1 1 1 mt;1 0 281 1 1 1 1 (Not 1 | mi 1 1 1 & 1 It 01 0 1 M M 1 0 1 0 :8 WN! 1 1 1 I. 0, to 1 & 1 g C. 1 1 =4 : E-• M CZE C E 2% 0 01 W 058 WEE 01 A A m M Z. 0 Mi 9 o,8 W ARME m D M W 0m E-1 Ln El r--1 C/1 O In . m 0 2 m m g 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 9 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 ill 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 It 1 1 1 1 04 1 1 M M 0-1 6•RCMe · 4 Eli ¥-1 0 -4 >40022 9 8 9 0 0 9 0 * O 0 O O 0 O * 01 01 . 0 1 2 a me 00000 * I r-{ r-1 . rl r-1 rl * .1 ..1 ea . * ** End Estimate Approve Budget Revise udget 101-9000-491.60-01 CONTINGENCIES 85,078 120,000 32,744 85,000 120,000 120,000 01-9000-491.90- NITY REINVESTMENT FD 1,300,000 1-9000-491.90-07 130,819 145,380 109,035 155,145 160,210 149,237 1-9000-491.90-08 CO NCE CENTER 281,088 89,477 89,476 77,657 94,904 94,904 1-9000-491.90-15 SPEC 267,501 390,793 293,095 351,006 389,599 370,119 -491.90-17 SENIOR CENTER 115,041 130,207 75,954 73,741 148,198 167,950 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 3,500 91,886 91,886 143,038 143,038 OUT/INTERFUND 797,949 847,743 567,560 749,435 935,949 ,225,248 ZIE'IOI ELP'666'Z SLE'EL8'Z SLE'ELS'Z AHIEOHEAY WVMENEW ZIE'ZOI ELP'656'g SLE'ELS'Z SLL'EL8'g ' NEHAODESLMI/,LOO NadSNVME 09P'9'V'Z CEP'SIO'V OIL'LOL'E DOE'009 8I0'ID8'E LEO'E88 09y'95"Z ZED'SIO'D OIL'LOL'E POE'009 BIO'IP8'E LEO'E88 GNflaNE,NI/,LAO SNE,SNVE,L .*** PREPARED 10/28/03, 14:31:43 BUDGET PRE ION SHEET PAGE 79 CONTINGENCI S 85,078 120,000 32,744 85,000 120,000 120,000 2003 Year ZIC'IOI tiE'TOI ~WY dixau YEAR ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INTERGOVERN. .,I,SEI~E[©~ aN¥ .I,N~PI OUT/INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT/INTERFUND CONTINGENCIES Town Clerk's Office Memo TO: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Date: October 29,2003 Re: Liquor License Occupation Tax - Proposed Fee Increase Background The Town assesses a liquor occupation tax fee to all liquor licensees. The fee varies depending upon the liquor license category. The Clerk's Office manages 59 liquor licenses, an all-time high. Processing includes new licenses, transfers of ownership, renewals, manager registration, modification of premises, corporation officer changes, trade name changes, changes of location, temporary permits, special event permits, bed & breakfast permits, and T.I.P.S. training coordination. The occupation tax provides funding for all processing that occurs with these licenses. The most recent fee increase occurred in August, 1997, and research of Loveland, Ft. Collins, Greeley and Boulder was conducted (see Page 2). Research not only verified that the Town's fees are significantly below front-range municipalities, it confirmed that these municipalities assess a fee for Special Event Liquor Permits. The graph on Page 2 includes the Town's current and proposed fees. Other than the Brew Pub License that was increased 40%, all other license fees were increased 20%. The graph also includes the implementation of a $10.00/day fee for Special Events that serve 3.2% beer, and $25.00/day for Special Events that serve malt, vinous, and spirituous liquor. These license fees are contained in the Liquor License Procedure Manual, and I have attached an ordinance that reflects the proposed fee increase. The effective date is January 1,2004. Budget The fee increase will generate an increase of approximately $6,254 in the 2004 Budget. Action The Town Clerk's Office requests your favorable consideration of the Ordinance increasing Liquor Occupation Tax Fees and implementation of fees for Special Events Permits as detailed on Page 2. 1 LIQUOR OCCUPATION TAX FRONT-RANGE MUNICIPALITY RESEARCH DATA LIQUOR ESTES ESTES LICENSE PARK PARK CATEGORY LOVELAND FT. GREELEY BOULDER COLLINS CURRENT PROPOSED BREW PUB ? $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $3,253.00 $620.00 $870.00 (manufacturer, distributor, retailer) (40%) HOTEL & $550.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $3,253.00 $620.00 $744.00 RESTAURANT (20%) TAVERN $670.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $3,253.00 $620.00 $744.00 (20%) BEER & WINE $300.00 $800.00 $600.00 $1,085.00 $470.00 $564.00 (20%) CLUB (20%) $550.00 $800.00 $500.00 $1,284.00 $470.00 $564.00 DRUGSTORE $670.00 $750.00 $500.00 $988.50 $470.00 $564.00 (20%) LIQUOR $670.00 $750.00 $500.00 $988.50 $470.00 $564.00 STORE (20%) 3.2% BEER, $300.00 $750.00 - $400.00 $375.00 $450.00 On Premise 3.2% BEER, Off Premise $550.00 $750.00 $250.00 $275.00 $375.00 $450.00 3.2% BEER, $550.00 $750.00 $500.00 $400.00 $375.00 $450.00 On/Off Premise (A1120%) SPECIAL $10.00/day $25.00/day $10.00/day $35.00/day -0- $10.00/day EVENTS - 3.2% BEER SPECIAL $25.00/day $25.00/day $25.00/day $25.00/day -0- $25.00/day EVENTS - LIQUOR • Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. A~ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LIQUOR AND BEER OCCUPATION TAX 09.»' RATE SCHEDULE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has determined that it is necessary to amend the Liquor and Beer Occupation Tax Rate Schedule of the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: That the Liquor and Beer Occupation Tax Rate Schedule shall be amended as more fully set forth on Exhibit "A". Section 2: These rate schedules are contained in the Liquor License Procedure Manual maintained by and on file with, the Town Clerk of the Town of Estes Park, as the same may be modified from time to time. Said fees shall not exceed the maximum allowable under applicable State law. Section 3: These rate schedules will take effect January 1, 2004. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2003, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk EXHIBIT "A" LIQUOR AND BEER OCCUPATION TAX p.4.-- 1 4.57.- , RATE SCHEDULE CATEGORY LIQUOR OCCUPATION TAX Brew Pub $870.00 Hotel & Restaurant $744.00 Tavern $744.00 Beer and Wine $564.00 Club $564.00 Liquor Licensed Drugstore $564.00 Retail Liquor Store $564.00 3.2% Retail Beer, On Premise, Off Premise, or On/Off Premise $450.00 Special Events Permit, 3.2% Beer $10.00/day Special Events Permit, Liquor $25.00/day , I ' 4. 4-1. Corlhmunity, Developmefit Memo TO: Town Board From: Bob Joseph, Community Development Director *4~ Date: September 25,2003 Re: Development Application Fees - Year 2004 The Town's development application fees are substantially inadequate to recover public costs associated with development review. If growth should assist in "paying its own way", the Town's development fees need to be increased. While the proposal for new fees is substantial, this brings those fees more in line with associated costs. The direct annual cost of front line staff (admin. assistant and two planners) is approximately $200,000. At least one half of this staffing expense can be directly attributed to the processing of development reviews and subdivisions. The proposed fee schedule would have produced approximately $50,000 in recovered costs in the last 12 months. Generally, the Town's application fees are $50.00. Year to date, this fee rate has recovered only $1100. As a practical matter, the General Fund is subsidizing the review process and indirectly, the associated development. There is public benefit associated with any given review, assuring that adequate streets, utilities and drainage facilities are provided, for example, but development proposals also generate direct and indirect costs. Development Review Activities and Costs • Meeting with applicants/consultants on projects. This occurs throughout a development project. • Assisting the general public on issues directly associated with a development proposal. • Site inspections during the development review process. • Development review team (Community Development, Public Works, Attorney, Building, Light and Power, Water) review and comment, and coordination. • Coordination and communication with outside agencies (CDOT, Corps of Engineers, Sanitation Districts, etc.) • Research on development applications. • Preparation of staff and review agency comments/recommendations. • Presentation of applications to Planning Commission and the boards. • Management of application files. • Preparation of hearing minutes. • Preparing and publishing hearing and legal notices. • Mailing notifications to property owners. • Mailing application materials to review agencies. • Review of engineering construction documents. e Review and management of improvement guarantees. • Legal review. • Recording of documents. The activities outlined above are direct costs associated with development review. The average cost per man hour of the front line Community Development staff time is $33/hr. It is obvious that a $50.00 application fee is inadequate for cost recovery. Attached is a proposed development review fee schedule for Year 2004 and 2005, along with a comparison of current proposed Town fees with Larimer County, Gunnison, Brighton, Golden, Fort Collins, Frisco, Steamboat Springs and Fort Lupton. Implementation of this fee increase should take place over a period of two years. Collection of 50% of the adopted rates should begin in January 2004, with collection of 100% of the adopted rates starting in January 2005. • Page 2 0 C E €54 e gE 9*. E ·52 E & 28@ D 6. .~00- w N a (0 1- O r.- U) U) O- U) 2 0 2 75 E 3 0 6 2@68 C> 2% 2% 0 tz & .2 tag i/3 16 m ~ M h=< 5 2 2 20 SC 2 g C a i O 00 c. 1 8 S€AE* R 5 § 12 8 1 2 O 0 2 - 06. 0 0 32 N 52 - (4 22 = 49NO€ COE tr., z '40.8 64.0.8 64 0 K a, b .S te 0 g 0 0 0® O2 c lf) c E Di ~ 1 2 0 to o 1,0 0 9, O 2 le 2,25 1 02@1 2 os -045: 0-0 $ er-- *215* 20822 *4 0 g Bg=v€ 6052 g CE -6. ~ ~ N 8 ·R k y (D 0 5 te ta 2.16 CD ¥.0 E ® 0 #;2#EE c 0 0 0 0 C C (9 004" - 2 -2 ch 22·12 iii 12 0 ' O 20 22 & € M€ &&9 5.02 0 0- co 64 ¢O 0 r U) CO co u) 0 05 2 *2 € a. 2=3- Z 2 . -r U) Ul -Application Special Review & Final Subdivision Boundary Line onference PUD Subdivision Plat Adjustment 50 $ 50 $ No Charge No Charge No Charge 400 $ 285 $ 200 Larimer County* ber i based on number of 400 $ 285 $ 200 Gunnison** No Fee Listed $55 $ 55 dep 135 $ 55 No Fee Listed No Fee Listed pels!-1 eed ON 092 $ 00€ $ 006 00£ lueul eJeAO 'Siskieue uo145!Jg Development Plan Rezoning Subdivision Amended Plat Jol Jed eJOB e joe Jed Jed 9$ snid og~~ 9$ snid 092$ Joi ~ed g$ snld 092$ ~l~6~~u~~~o~~<~·'~ ~~11 jed 9$ snid 009$ DGZ ejoe Jed o€$ snid 00£$ ueplog $3 600 or $4,000 $2,4~00 ~ $5,000 ents Jed g LS snid OOES Jed spafoid spefoid SeJoe X.leu!Ul!le.Id Application Fee Comparison Table e p X iwel pelloelep ANu~eg sejoe $400 - $1200 based on square $400 to $1,200 $ 1,500 - Less ~ Proposed Fees* footage depending on type other fees paid 40ee JOJ 91$ additional acre Proposed Application Fees 100203 $200 - $600 based on square $2,000 to $3,0 0 ' ueld JueludoleAep leug Joi 009$ eje See~ J~e~p! 01#04 pue 'ueld .peBJe4O e euiejp '¥11 uo!1!ppe Ul JOU!Ul JOJ 00 L$ lications and 00 L ls-1!J elll J Estes Park - Current Fees* No Charge footage depending on 0 C E 64 eu €* O 0 16 .g 0- E *§ ME 0 -0 -0 Oile=E 0 0 ic j NE-02 E. 16 = ~ R 5 2 E COE- g'Z.ct 2~02 64-0 C 8 0 16 C - 0 4 6 % 6-0 ga C (D = a) 0 £ O 0- J BEE 0--a E .- a) . 8 4 IL -Ci 3 9@d:f O -7; 1£ 2 ®C= c - R -O v-g@m. 2 2%9 iR .5 &4 6< E< 64 -C o CO Ri 6 E (D LL - LL J.C .59 a D CD g CD 2 2 ¢2 -- 8 2 a L u) O L v •- Zse 2 2 5;g@ 2 2 2 &1 & E 8 2 000)#LOC 8290&0 10-0 09-Lrf.m --2 e M a 0 a S.Mauga £23 0 ' 09 L $ lou J! 'uo!883 09 k $ 09£$ 093 '091$ snid ooz $ 92 $ 91 $ 009' I auoN sBupds woquleeis 92 $ 09X euoN 9Zk $ 1 O9k $ 00£ euoN euoN lime)IS UoisiA!Pqns uojdnl Pod Pre-Application Special Review & Final Subdivision Boundary Line Development Plan Rezoning Subdivision Amended Plat Conference PUD Subdivision Plat Adjustment 11 LUS J! 091.$ eel ueld luewdoleAeal! leld Mall 84nbei $200 minimum, plus Fort Collins No Fee Listed f platted. inal $1,000 if No Fee Listed per APO label. Half er each 100 per each No Fee Listed No Fee Listed I lot over dditional lot over two lots £ 1 JO Je Application Fee Comparison Table Preliminary U!04 93!JeA 000'1$ 01 000' L uo 5epuede umber of lots metes and bounds, $977 plus $0.50 fee if under 5 acres pue SJOCI45!eu 01 6umelu Jo }soo 941 pue le6el Joi 09$ 1noqe Alieo!dxl s! s!4.1. 'Me!AeJ ueld Buunp sjuminsuoo pue Jiels Xq pennou! seel 6u!uueld pue '5u!Jeeu!6ue 'le68l Joi pell!q osle s! lueolldde 841 Wed SelsEI ul :eloN, Proposed Application Fees 100203 einjoruls eeJ J!841 6u!Me!Ae] Allual.Ino S! uos!uung „ 'see; 5uipJooeJ Xed kelle/\ sels3 peleJodloou!un elll ll! Buiplinq slueoqddv -seei 6uipJooei sked M.led sels3 'se!0ue6e peloe#e + 1!un Development Plans. Preliminary lualudoleAep lie Preliminary and Final $600 if small development and euoN OOS!.1=1 Joi 92$ Me!AeJ ueld te 0 0 - Cl o &18 2 R ff} O- te g m 0 te * E * L u- 8 $ 6, 0 C 6 % 11 2 a .C O '- 2 =£ 3 9% Easement Street Name Change Condominium Annexation Temporary Use No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge 50 No Charge No Charge No Charge 100 $ loprnent Nl Fee $ .; 285 $ 50 $ 350 $ 1,200 $ 50 PmS!1 Ge=1 ON eiqeolddv ioN ed4 uo Supue pels!1 eed ON pels!1 eed ON Pejs!-1 ee,1 ON 99 $ Pals!1 ae:I ON 9€ $ 9£ pe~S!1 ee=1 ON 99 uosjuung 09 Z# 'se]08 00: Ook $ 09X $ pejs!1 ea~ ON pms!1 eed ON pms!-1 eed ON Pals!-1 eed ON 00£ Me!Aekl },UOC] aJOB e oe e 001. $ 09 Me!/\32 1,uoa Me!Aekl 1,uoa Me!Aeki 1,LIOO ee:1 ON -J014 ueplog 9$ snid 000' Mt 1SJU Joi ajoe Jed moe leuoi eJO~~ L im!'~JI~ JOJ 00 L $ .ABM minary Separate Lot Variance Administrative Condominium Map Review Petitions Appeal $200 to $400 depending on type 00 to $400 02* $ 09 $ 981 $ 982 $ ook $ 00K Application Fee Comparison Table ROW or Final Vacation Map €ozoo k see:1 uoneo!iddv pesodojd 1884S Joi 009$ OggS 'AEM-p-ll@J lueluesee Estes Park - Current €e O 0 0 5 O . 29 8 SES* 38 2 014 .5 N vow,55~EPLo 1~M tb 256 53 2 * 0 4- 0 €'- 8 2 &1 5 6 52 3 = 000=* 8516.2-6=2 agE & a & 5,2 * & 0 , v (ou, a.te ao (0 g 12 i & .3 -% Be U m 'k v L 2 2 i - r- 1 2 z:E % 18 C 22"~ aa 44 2 Z g 2 -0 & O 'Di 8 2 m m C :E 0- f / :22 8 0 -0 0- 0) E te . 91 Pejs!-1 003 ON pels!1 ee=1 ON JOJ Oot'$ XeM SBulldS leoqu,eels 92 euoN euoN gzl. $ 69 K euoN euoN uoidnl Pod Easement Street Name Change Condominium Annexation Temporary Use Fort Collins 5$ 5 No Fee Listed No Fee Listed No Fee Listed $ 1,389 No Fee Listed No Fee Listed 250 $ o $150 for misc. Frisco ereof permits fee if 00 per dred J! peddojp eq pinoM Sqwl~~'~~oj~esq~~~e~~~eejpk~j~e~~onqoqs~!~~~~u6nu~e'~.Zo~u~p~jo~~ie~~d6~ef~~A~~ij~3oqp~~~~~o~~1usn,!'~W.=1!rid ,0WXeqpelln~see,le£~polpaim osie s! lueo!idde ell; wed sejsa ul :moN. ROW or Separate Lot Variance Administrative JOJ 000 T; cloguet .Ird Condominium Map Review Petitions Appeal 50 is appeal of ff decision or decision. No Fee Listed No Fee Listed 350 No Fee Listed $ 250 Comn g xeidnp 'J-SJOJ 009$ tud leA Bulpuedep 001' LE Uo Buipuedep 000' Application Fee Comparison Table 01009$ lUOJJ SepeA 01000' I$ u'04 sep -Jo-146!J Joi 008$ Final Vacation Map fozoot seed uoneoliddv pesodoJd Slol Jo Jequlnu UO sjol Jo Jequl pejueweldw! ate sesemou! pesodoJd elil Minimum Time Demand Chart Oct.1.2003 ~- A. Initial Contact 0.5 hr B. Initial Site Visit 0.5 hr C. Research 0.5 hr D. Pre-application Meeting 1.0 hr E. Prepare and distribute pre-app notes 0.5 hr F. Submittal Completion Check 0.5 hr G. Prepare and distribute Agency and Public Notice 1.5 hr H. Prepare StaffReport and PowerPoint 1.5 hr - I. Prepare Board / Commission Notebooks 0.5 hr J. Present and Discuss Report at Study Session 0.5 hr K. Present and Discuss Report at Public Meeting 0.5 hr L. Prepare Outcome Letter and File Record 0.5 hr M. Prepare Meeting Minutes 0.5 hr N. Legal Review $50 O. Legal Notice Publication $10 Total Minimum Time Demand 9.0 hrs 9.0 hrs @ $33 hr. (ave. staffcost) + $50 legal+ $10 publication = $357 45 TOWN OF ESTES ~PARK i.' A '1: I 4 V AUG 2 9 2003 N j 1.1 1 I -- MU-F, S. r f «-7-7~ -04 1....1 AA- J-i. --0=-1~,4*M~*M~*, * , 21&32~B~~~F 24*#Ry:7-4 1 / Community Services Funding Application 2004 Submit completed application by September 10, 2003, 5:00PM, to: Randy Repola 170 MacGregor Avenue P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Eyes lf- i vit 1 caft Fict I i tci Program Title , Gty (C fl\Cw\£ 1.. hij# or- ENs Ec 0 'j Agency Rvt *Li &542# 213 Contact Person -51. ll,kle/ Title ~Pinc f~ell . Phone :STS- 752? Address 4 56 (25MAJ,h¢G~ l>)01U€_ Esk R.4 '66 850 Dollar amount requested 2004:$ (62080 Non-profit status: Yes ~ No In process 501(c)3, tax exempt? Yes No ~ Other:, Federal tax identification number: 610-03334 When was your organization/agency established? ~~ ~ C:\Documents and Settings\Randy Repola\My Documents\Personal\ATA Projects\Community services funding application 2004.doc http://www.estesnet.com (970) 586-5331 • RO. BOX 1200 • 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE • ESTES PARK, CO 80517 • FAX (970) 586-2816 1. What is the mission of your organization? 71 3(Ovld€ cjURIL#7 dd juart C, 51„1 a.1 ~-1)Wa ·€,Afloyees in an effork .6 41&*FA-Cl- a,uj karat#,1 el lu«(/9 tu°'44,-c-€_ , 2. Describe the population and geographic area targeted for service through your program/agency. C- l -71 £- e,dvt Esres Ualleil tnelusw<- 00.- r t.tkro-0-0 GPM-)3 \ All e,Ls- t#/2 ) U 3. What specific activities or program goals will be supported with the assistance of Estes Park funding, if granted? n \I /k,D 7.bile/7 7 5 94 e /0,1 c co y, 4,634 4 40 -Rt s offll /njerk,1 bvjad- . '-Ike scul As hk p Ob5 0-'66 AR l 0-ror ?re-?ov-hAU ef- @2_ se.La,rk6 841 6,674 10- dept°yes . 4. How many people are being served by your agency? 2 4,14 3 f O-*. #412 72,un Va,th..61 6,91. CD %79/yos 133 okers A A W.j{ A#47- , How many people in the Estes Valley will be served by vour prOVamlagency, Ati tow. eun filres W-tH-· LKId,Vi beL,£6% l&0 s What percent does this represent of overall clients served by your program/agency? - ~ , 5. How many area citizens were served by your program/agency in the calendar year 2000? 4 C:\Documents and Settings\Randy Repola\My Documents\Personal\ATA Projects\Community services funding application 2004.doc 6. What is the source of information used to verify the need for the services your program/agency is providing? 1le- r<,1-enhin ~fecruj¥*tzl- ret" k te*ei-24 bii fic <ckoe< 6,sh,(21- , 7. Who will be responsible for the administration of the program or service? -ILL (jak<fr r Pr,hopoll 8. Are there currently any other agencies providing similar services to the target population? If so, please identify them. Rou ·-12 1 a-k a£.»ri. 09 - 9. Describe any cooperative activities between your agency and other agencies offering similar services. Activity Cooperating Agency Cooperating Agency Contact person /9 i '\ (NA ( 10 C a.f€._ Sciool b,>6-~c.1-/rouK kn Lkkle r A.9 £96% Klk L ,6.er 10. Budget information: Year Expenditures Income Administrative overhead amount 2002 (actual) 39, H 7 14, 197- 0 2003 (budget) 44: 474 42,80 23 0 C:\Documents and Settings\Randy Repola\My Documents\Personal\ATA Projects\Community services funding application 2004.doc . 11. Did your organization receive funding from the Town of Estes Park in 2003? Yes 20 No If yes, what was the amount? $2006 What activities were provided with these funds? Cld Acarc- Ofeinfl>.03\01'Ale} fix 17- c_L\3 A }Le 11>u. 4 Ake g (i,4 GO EJ,vol Gsly, c f- 4 12. Please list all other funding sources or contributions anticipated for 2004, including federal, state and local contributions and in-kind sources of support such as donated volunteer hours. Anticipated Funding Sources: Source Amount Have these funds been received? Yes, No, In process. 58001 3.striol- sofit£ 1- 03DO 1 4 ~406095 13. I swear and affirm that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 41 ~Agency Director Board President/Chair SE - 9529 Phone Phone C:\Documents and Settings\Randy Repola\My Documents\Personal\ATA Projects\Community services funding application 2004.doc October 29,2003 Dear Mayor John Baudek, I would like to thank you for your support of the toddler/daycare center housed at Estes Park Elementary School. The program serves the children of school district and town employees. This year, there are twelve children enrolled. We have 1 town employee, 11 district employees and 4 on the waiting list from the town, museum and school district. Currently, there are two town employees taking advantage of this program. This employee works for the Electric Department and his spouse works for the Town of Estes Park. These employees have expressed to me that this program has been critical to their work schedule with the Town of Estes Park. I would like to request a donation, once again, from the Town of Estes Park to help with the ongoing costs of this program. Because we operate the program on a shoestring budget, the $3,000 that the Town donated last year provided toys, safety equipment, tables and chairs, and a computer check-in program for the center. A contribution of $3,000 this year would help us purchase more age-appropriate toys, health supplies, and some additional furniture for this program, which is currently operating at capacity. Thank you for your ongoing support of this innovative program! It is clear that you value employees of the Town of Estes Park and I look forward to our ongoing partnership in this program. Jo~n Wahler Program Director cc: Dr. Richard Kastendieck