The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 2003-11-25Prepared 11/20/03 The Mission of the Town of Estes Fark le to plan and provide reliable, hi0h-value services for our citizens, vieitore, and employees. We take 0reat pride eneurind and enhancir10 the quality of life in our community by Deine 0ood stewards of public reeourcee and natural eettin0. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, November 25,2003 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated November 11, 2003. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Utilities, November 13, 2003: 1. Mobile Meter Reading Equipment Purchase, $23,750. 2. ATV Replacement Vehicle Purchase, $7,500 w/trade-in. 3. Riverside Dr. Project Change Order, $34,048.39/G. L. Hoff Co. B. Public Works, November 20,2003: 1. EstesValley.net - Lease Agreement Renewal for 2004 (Satelitte Dish Installation/Municipal Building Roof). 2. Knoll-Willows Trail - Construction of Prefabricated Bridge, $21,000. 3. Transfer Station Operation Agreement between Larimer County, A- 1Transfer and the Town of Estes Park. 1-yr. term expiring 12/31/13. 4. Enos Mills Sculpture - Bond Park Site Location. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. 2004 COMPENSATION PLAN. Assistant Town Administrator Repola. 2. POLICE DEPARTMENT: Police Chief Richardson. A. ORDINANCE #19-03 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.28 - PERTAINING TO DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND SURRENDER OF A MINOR'S DRIVER'S LICENSE. B. MUTUAL AID GENERAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK AND THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. 1 Continued on reverse side i C. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH LARIMER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES PERTAINING TO JUVENILE REFERRALS. 3. LIQUOR OCCUPATION FEE - PROPOSED RATE INCREASE. Town Clerk O'Connor. 4. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. MEETING CANCELLATION NOTICE: Due to the upcoming holiday season, the Town Board meeting scheduled December 23,2003 has been cancelled. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, November 11, 2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 1 1 th day of November, 2003. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W. Gillette David Habecker Lori Jeffrey-Clark G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Randy Repola, Assistant Town Administrator Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: Trustee Habecker PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Jeffrey-Clark acknowledged celebrations held this Veteran's Day Holiday. On behalf of the Board, Mayor Baudek expressed appreciation to all veterans for their service to this Country. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated October 28,2003, and Town Board Budget Study Session Minutes dated October 30 and November 4,2003. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, November 6,2003: Conference Center: 1. Rocky Mountain Park Inn LLC - Service Agreement. 2. " - Food & Beverage Concession Agreement. Special Events Dept.: 1. Resolution #17-03 - Celebrate Estes Event, Chamber of Commerce, December 6-7,2003. 2. Stanley Park Fairgrounds Policy Manual Amendment - Section C pertaining to Rental Rates. 3. 2004 Estes Valley Productions Concert Agreement. 4. Lions Club Concession Stand Agreement - Renewal. 5. Performance Park Historical Drama, 2004 Summer Series. 4. Estes Park Housing Authority, September 10,2003 (acknowledgment only). Board of Trustees - November 11,2003 - Page 2 5. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, October 7,2003 (acknowledgement only). 6. Estes Valley Planning Commission, October 21, 2003 (acknowledgement only). 7. Resolution #12-03 - New Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License Application filed by Seabear, Inc., dba ESTES DELI & CATERING CO., 361 S. St. Vrain Ave. (former location of"Jumpin' Jacks Barbecue") - Setting public hearing date of December 9,2003. 8. Resolution #13-03 - New Tavern Liquor License Application filed by Agapemou, Ltd., dba KELLI'S, 110 W. Elkhom Ave. - Setting public hearing date of December 9,2003. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the consentragenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. l A. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing for all Consent Agenda Items, and announced that if the Applicant, Public or Town Board wish to speak to any of these consent items, they will be moved to the "Action Item" Section where the public hearing will be conducted as follows: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Public Testimony D. Mayor - Close Public Hearing E. Motion to Approve/Deny. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: A. FINAL SUBDIVISIONS: 1. Pawnee Meadow, Second Filing, Lots 4 and 5, Pawnee Meadow Subdivision, First Filing, Scott & Kim Miller/Applicants. B. AMENDED PLATS: 1. Lots 32A and 33A, Amended Plat of Lots 32, 33, 34, 35 and Portions of Lots 1, 31 and 37, White Meadow View Place Addition, Don Darling/Applicant. C. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAPS. 1. Solitude Condominiums, Phase I, Time Extension for Lot 1, Solitude Subdivision, Fish Creek Properties, LLC/Applicant. 2. Solitude Condominiums, Phase 11, Time Extension for Lot 2, Solitude Subdivision, Crystal Creek Development, Inc./Applicant. 3. Solituda Condominiums, Phase V, Time Extension for Lot 5, Solitude Subdivision, Crystal Creek Development, Inc./Applicant. D. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS: 1. Lots 35 and 36, Block 6, Hupp Addition, Allie & Charles Jones/Applicants, dba the Grubsteak Restaurant. Board of Trustees - November 11, 2003 - Page 3 E. MINOR SUBDIVISION & REZONING: 1. Witt Subdivision of Lot 2, Seybold Subdivision, Bradley & Eunice Witt/Applicants. Trustee Doylen requested Item 1.A. 1 be removed from the consent agent and discussed in a public hearing. Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Barker) Items 1.B-E be approved, and it passed unanimously. Item #1.A.1 - Pawnee Meadow, Second Filing, Lots 4 and 5, Pawnee Meadow Subdivision, First Filing. Mayor Baudek opened the public hearing, and Community Development Dir. Joseph presented the staff report and Subdivision Improvement Agreement which provides for the paving of Pawnee Dr., which will increase road connectivity in the surrounding neighborhood. Dir. Joseph reported that even though the Town Board approved the preliminary plat for this subdivision at the July 11, 2000 meeting, and apbroved extensions of the preliminary plat during subsequent meetings, the developer has not yet completed all conditions as outlined by the Planning Commission on February 15,2000. Staff recommends the developer be granted thirty days from this date to meet all conditions specified by the Planning Commission and submit all required documents. If the conditions are not met and all required documents submitted within the specified thirty days, approval of the preliminary plat and final plat will become null and void. The developer would then be required to proceed through the entire approval process once again utilizing the existing Code. Concluding all discussion, Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Newsom) the Pawnee Meadows Second Filing Final Subdivision Plat and Subdivision Improvement Agreement be approved as outlined above, that all conditions be met and required documents submitted within thirty days from this approval date, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Newsom, Doylen, Barker and Jeffrey-Clark. Those voting "No" Trustee Gillette. 2. ACTION ITEMS: A. JANCO Revised Development Agreement to Allow Ownership of Individual Units - CONTINUE TO DECEMBER 9,2003. B. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment Bylaws, Amended - CONTINUE TO DECEMBER 9,2003. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. Bill Kaufman/Transportation Commissioner (District 5) expressed his appreciation to the Town for their hospitality this evening, and commented on the State's budget reductions and their impact on upcoming Department of Transportation (CDOT) projects. He encouraged residents to contact him at his Loveland office: (970) 667- 8888 or thelaw@verinet.com. 2004 BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING - ADOPTION. Mayor Baudek opened the public hearing, and Town Administrator Widmer read a memorandum dated November 11,2003, and presented the 2004 Budget for approval. Finance Officer Brandjord reported that Colorado budget law requires a public hearing to discuss how the Highway Users Trust Fund revenues are proposed to be expended, and he read a memorandum dated November 7, 2003. The Board of Trustees - November 11,2003 - Page 4 following resolutions were read aloud: Resolution #14-03 - Setting the Mill Levy of 1.822 mills; Resolution #15-03 - Adopting the 2004 Budget; and Resolution #16- 03 - Appropriating Sums of Money.' Finance Officer Brandjord noted a change in the General Fund total from $9,555,090 to $9,579,209. Trustee Doylen commented on the correlation between mill levies and sales tax revenues, explaining that the mill levy remains low due to the amount of sales tax revenues collected. Without sales tax revenues, the mill levy would be much higher to cover the services and amenities provided by local government. Bruce Grant/Estes Park Citizens for Recycling Committee withdrew their $17,000 funding request for the cardboard recycling program, but requested the discussions on an appropriate site continue. Those speaking in favor 6f increasing the 2004 funding allocation to Partners of Estes Park from $3,000 to $5,000 include: Susan Crabbs, Mary Ellen Garrett, Courtney Hill, and Jerry Donner. Discussion was held regarding partnerships, program activities/hours, additional community funding, and fiscal responsibility. Sarah Holt commented on the Performing Arts Center Feasibility Study. Town Administrator Widmer clarified that the feasibility study is not a site study, but rather a feasibility study of a downtown location. Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) to increase the 2004 funding allocation to Partners of Estes Park from $3,000 to $5,000, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Newsorri Gillette, Doylen, and Jeffrey-Clark. Those voting "No" Trustee Barker. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Highway Users Trust Fund, and Resolutions 14, 15, and 16-03 be approved, and it passed unanimously. Town Administrator Widmer extended his appreciation to Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Finance Officer Brandjord and Department Heads for their effort in preparing the 2004 Budget. 2. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Sales Tax Report. Due to the Veteran's Day Holiday, the report is unavailable at this time, thus it will be distributed upon receipt. B. Project Update. Work is progressing well on the Fish Creek Trail and the Kayak Course adjacent to Performance Park. Mayor Baudek noted that due to the upcoming holiday season, the Town Board meeting scheduled December 23,2003 has been cancelled. There being no further business, Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting at 7:53 p.m. John Baudek, Mayor Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, November 13, 2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the UTILITIES COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 13th day of November, 2003. Committee: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustees Gillette and Newsom Attending: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustee Newsom Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Public Works Director Linnane, Utilities Dir. Goehring, Sr. Electrical Engr. Matzke, Assistant Mangelsen, Fleet Mgr. Mahany, Sr. Meter Specialist O'Connor, Construction/Facilities Mgr. Sievers, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Trustee Gillette Chairman Jeffrey-Clark called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. LIGHT AND POWER DEPARTMENT. Platte River Power Authoritv - Presentation of 1/01/04 Wholesale Rate Increase. Public Works Dir. Linnane introduced Jon Little, Community Relations and Marketing Manager and John Bleem, Division Manager, Customer Services/PRPA who gave a PowerPoint presentation on Platte River's 3.9% Wholesale Rate Increase that becomes effective January 1, 2004. The outline consisted of the following: * Rates history. PRPA has maintained stable rates for the past 20 years, and in 2002, rates were 3.3% less than rates paid in 1983. â€¢ In a Colorado Residential Rate Comparison of 58 CAMU (Colorado Assn. of Municipal Utilities) municipalities, Estes Park ranks 9th lowest. The average monthly bill in 2002 was $46.38, 9% less than Poudre Valley REA. Outline of rate increase drivers: * Decreasing revenues/Increasing operating costs * Large capital investment due to city growth â€¢ Debt service costs to increase after experiencing years of decreasing costs * Operating cost increases â€¢ WAPA rate increases of 17% in 2002 and 12% in January, 2004 â€¢ Between 1991-2002, there are 50% more customers, 63% more energy used, and 90% higher peak â€¢ Total Capital Additions. PRPA has spent $220 Million since 1997 and additional upgrades are expected in the future. In summary, the single 2004 3.9% increase will not meet future needs; therefore, PRPA expects another increase between 3.9 to 6.9% in 2005. Pending additional information, this two-phase approach should help minimize the overall long-term increase. Mr. Little confirmed that each municipality not PRPA, schedules local press releases and communication with utility customers. Additional discussion followed on long-term planning, with Dir. Linnane confirming that the 2004 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Utilities Committee - November 13, 2003 - Page 2 Budget includes the wholesale rate increase as well as a retail rate increase for a total increase of approximately 8.3%. Chairman Jeffrey-Clark expressed the Committee's appreciation to both PRPA Representatives for their presentation. Owner Request to Vacate Utilities Easement, Lot 9, Stanley Heights. Frank and Jeoffrey Schageman granted an easement for under-grounding of the electric line crossing Lot 12 owned by George and Dorothy Gibbs. The Gibb's request to underground the electric service at Town expense was denied at the 7/22/03 Town Board meeting, thus, the Schagemans are now requesting the easement be vacated. The Public Works Dept. issued notice to all concerned parties informing them of this request and consideration by the Public Works Committee. If recommended for approval, Town Attorney White will prepare all necessary documentation. The Committee recommends approval of the request to vacate the electric utility easement for Lot 9, Stanley Heights, authorizing Town Attorney White to prepare a Quit Claim Deed. Mobile Meter Reading Equipment Upgrade - Request to Purchase. Approximately 8,000 radio-type electric and water meters divided into 43 radio frequency zones are read each month. The physical operation requires the meter reader to drive routes adjacent to these 43 zones/routes, and each zone crossover point requires the driver to input the data necessary to read the next route. Currently, a single-frequency mobile data collector is being used. Hardware and software have been improved significantly, allowing multiple routes to be loaded via an 8-frequency system and read at the same time, resulting in a significant labor savings. This type of system would reduce the number of zones to 1/3 the existing number. Additionally, this equipment is an important component in plans to completely upgrade the meter reading system with automated radio frequency equipment by 2007. Mountain States Pipe & Supply has submitted a quote for $23,750, and the 2003 Revised Budgeted amount is $25,000. Sr. Meter Specialist O'Connor confirmed that radioreads can be obtained from 2,000-3,000 feet away in the service area, and readings are more accurate than front-range areas. Although "false readings" do occur, this equipment will reduce the occurrence. Although the customer base has significantly increased within the past 15 years, the staffing level has not increased due to the automated radio frequency equipment, and staff anticipates a 40% savings in terms of vehicle and personnel cost with installation of the equipment upgrad6. The Committee applauded staff's proactive stance on the meter reading system plan, and recommends acceptance of the Mountain States quote in the amount of $23,750. Request Authorization to Purchase ATV Vehicle (Replacement). The 2003 Budget includes $12,000 for replacement of the 1992 Polaris 6x6 ATV. This vehicle is used to provide employee access to remote power lines, poles, and transformers during storm trouble and to patrol power lines. The Replacement Policy does not address miscellaneous vehicles, and Fleet Mgr. Mahany confirmed that this vehicle now requires significant maintenance and is unreliable. The following bids were received: Ft. Collins Motor Sports $7,500 w/trade-in Colorado Power Sports $8,142 w/trade-in The Committee commended Mgr. Mahany for the successful management of the fleet, and recommends acceptance of the Ft. Collins Motor Sports bid for a Polaris 6x6 ATV in the amount of $7,500 with trade-in. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Utilities Committee - November 13, 2003 - Page 3 WATER DEPARTMENT. Riverside Drive Proiect - Request approval of Change Order. As staff reported previously at the July Utilities and Public Works Committee meetings, a change order was anticipated due to unavailable on-site fill material resulting from the snow conditions during construction of the project. The review and concurrence of the consulting engineer/project manager and subsequent documentation by the contractor, G. L. Hoff Co., the removal and replacement of fill has been accounted for. The cost allocation is as follows: Original 2002 Purchase Order/Contract $410,433.32 Total project cost -444,481.71 Deficit ($ 34,048.39) Cost Allocation to fund the Deficient: Light and Power 2003 Revised Budget, Capital, underground Conductors $ 10,000.00 Water 2003 Revised Budget, Capital, Capital Infrastructure 17,048.39 Community Reinvestment 2003 Revised Budget, Capital Streets/Misc. 7,000.00 Total Change Order $ 34,048.39 Although a time delay was experienced due to lack of documentation supplied by the Contract, Dr. Linnane complimented the worthwhile project and job performance by Construction/Facilities Mgr. Sievers. The Committee recommends approval of the Change Order in the amount of $34,048.39 with cost allocation as outlined above. REPORTS. Light and Power Dept. > Fall River Hydro Plant Museum Award. Museum Dir. Kilsdonk displayed an Award from the American Assn. for State and Local History for the restoration and rehabilitation of the Historic Fall River Hydroplant. PRPA was a significant partner on this project and a local press release was issued. Chairman Jeffrey-Clark applauded the efforts of Mike Mangelsen and Betty Kilsdonk and their staff on this prestigious award and suggested this project also be publicized in the front-range media outlets. 7 The Monthly Financial Report was unavailable due to budget process; however, with recent budget revisions, calculations are on target. k Utilities Late Payment Policy Revision - Update. An employee team has been researching a revision to the late payment policy and the policy will be submitted to the Committee for their review/consideration in the near future. When this item is placed on the agenda, Staff will include statistics on the percentage of delinquent accounts on the utility system. > Financial Plan - Update. Black and Veatch will present the Financial Plan Report at the December gth Town Board meeting. An annual 3.9% increase in 2005 through 2008 is proposed in addition to the 2003-2004 rate increases and the 2004 Purchased Power Rider Charge. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Utilities Committee - November 13, 2003 - Page 4 > Committee Meeting Scheduling Conflict. The PRPA Board meeting is scheduled December 11 th and this date creates a scheduling conflict with the Utilities Committee. Committee recommends cancellation of the Dec. 11th meeting; however, such an emergency arise, the Committee could re- schedule. > Miscellaneous Projects. The Christmas Decoration Project is 50% complete at this time, and the Contractor, Estes Valley Home & Garden, must complete installation by Thanksgiving. Water Dept. â€¢ The Monthly Financial Report was unavailable due to the budget process; however, as with the Light and Power Fund, with recent budget revisions, calculations are on target. â€¢ Lienemann/Fall River Estates Lawsuit. Mr. Lienemann had sued the Town based on his 1971 Agreement for water service to his development. Mr. Lienemann claimed the Town was prohibited by contract from connecting additional properties to the water system. The judge has ruled in the Town's favor stating the Town was in compliance with the contract by allowing additional properties to connect to the system. â€¢ Water Dept. Rate Study - Update. Black & Veatch will also present the Water Rate Study at the Dec. 9th Town Board meeting. A water rate increase of 2.9% in 2007 and 2008 is proposed. With the 2.9% increase approved in 2001 through year 2006, the rate increase will be extended through 2008. â€¢ Miscellaneous Projects Update. Design for the Fall River Tank Project that extends service to RMNP boundary should be completed the end of December, 2003, and staff anticipates beginning construction in spring, 2004. There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 9:00 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, November 20,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 2001 day of November, 2003. Committee: Chairman Barker, Trustees Doylen and Habecker Attending: Chairman Barker, Trustee Doylen Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Public Works Director Linnane, Facilities/Const. Mgr. Sievers, EPURA Dir. Smith, Clerk O'Connor Absent Trustee Habecker Chairman Barker called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. Public Works Director revised the agenda to include the following item: ROOFTOP ANTENNA DISH LEASE - LESSEE REQUESTS RENEWAL. As required in the Roof Access Lease Agreement, ESTESVALLEY.NET has requested a lease extension from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. Dish installation is complete and in-service and staff is unaware of any outstanding issues. Dir. Linnane confirmed he will request a financial statement from the lessee, and the Committee recommends approval of the one-year lease extension, with review in 2004 to ensure an unfair financial advantage has not been created. KNOLL-WILLOWS TRAIL - PREFABRICATED BRIDGE - REQUEST APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION. At the September 18th Public Works Committee meeting, staff was directed to return for authorization to proceed with construction of the bridge. The original custom-built bridge cost estimate was $28,000. Staff researched a prefabricated bridge and the estimated cost is $21,000, installed. The 2003 Budget Fund Balance for this project is approximately $90,000, and the estimated cost ($21,000) includes metal railings that take maintenance into consideration. The Committee recommends staff proceed with bridge construction, at a cost of $21,000. ENOS MILLS SCULPTURE BOND PARK SITE SELECTION - REFERRED BY EPURA. Bonnie Fulford, artist of the "Enos Mills & Scotch" sculpture presented her request for a site to display said sculpture to EPURA. At their 10/15/03 Board Meeting, EPURA recommended the sculpture be placed in the northeast corner of Bond Park. Bill Pinkham, President/Art Center, has been coordinating the project and was in attendance. Dir. Linnane stated Streets and Parks personnel would assist with placement of the sculpture and they would select all materials required for installation. Miscellaneous costs, such as lighting, should be included in the fund-raising efforts organized by Mr. Pinkham and the Art Center, as the Town did not specifically budget for funding assistance with this project. EPURA Dir. Smith provided background information on this project, adding that with Town staff, he investigated the site. As discussed in EPURA's minutes dated 10/15/03, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - November 20,2003 - Page 2 future Bond Park master plans may require relocation of the sculpture and the proposed installation will accommodate that possibility. The Committee discussed the philosophical issue of the sculpture itself, i.e. Enos Mills is known as the "Father of Rocky Mountain National Park", is the Park boundary (north or south entrance) a more appropriate site? Mr. Pinkham offered additional background information including confirmation that the Fall River Visitor's Center is opposed to placement on their site. StreeUParks Supt. Speedlin reported he had met with the artist and a 9x4' rock base is needed, as well as a boom truck to unload the sculpture. The northeast section of Bond Park is conducive with the underground irrigation system and special events. The foundry will anchor the sculpture to the base and to facilitate undue hardship in the future, Supt. Speedlin will advise the foundry concerning potential relocation in the future. The sculpture should be placed the first week of December, 2003. The Committee recommends approval to locate Ms. Fulford's Enos Mills sculpture in the northeast section of Bond Park for the time being, noting their desire to reserve their options for a permanent site pursuant to pending discussions on new entry signs on Hwy. 36. Additionally, the Committee stated their reservation is not intended to negatively reflect upon the artist nor the Arts Center. Furthermore, the Committee expects this item will be discussed during the upcoming Town Board meeting 11/25/03. MUNICIPAL BUILDING REMODELING PROJECT DESIGN - REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO PRESENT COST AND FINAL DESIGN DIRECTLY TO TOWN BOARD JANUARY 13,2004. Dir. Linnane explained that construction of the Municipal Building Remodeling Pr6ject can be completed two weeks earlier if staff and the architect could present the Final Design and Guaranteed Maximum Price at the 1/13/04 Town Board meeting in lieu of the January 16th Public Works Committee meeting. This design will not be completed by the December Public Works Committee meeting. As completion is expected to take six months, the early start-up would help ensure completion prior to July 4~11. The Committee recommends approval of staff's request to submit this item directly to the 1/13/04 Town Board meeting. TRANSFER STATION OPERATING AGREEMENT - REQUEST APPROVAL TO REVIEW WITH EXISTING PARTIES (3), INCLUDING THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH 3.G. TITLE TRANSFER OF FACILITIES. Larimer County and A-1 Trash (A-1) are renewing their initial 1/31/84 Operation Agreement for the 10-yr. period of 12/31/03-12/31/13. The agreement establishes A-1 operations compensation procedures, the revenue margin, and establishes accounting guidelines used by the County to set transfer station rates, as well as other stipulations. The agreement contains a one-paragraph provision that requires Town approval. Paragraph 3.G. Title of Facilities - states that upon contract termination, legal title of the buildings (gate house, original transfer station tipping floor area, and addition to the tipping floor area) shall be transferred to the Town. The office and garage buildings now occupied by A-1 are not included. Staffs interpretation is that the Town would pay the operator the difference between the initial actual cost of these buildings and the County's reimbursed depreciation. The Town has the right to refuse ownership, ' whereas the ownership would remain with the County. This clause benefits Estes Park residents by establishing either the Town or County, rather than private companies, as the regulating agency of solid waste transfer to the County Landfill. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - November 20,2003 - Page 3 Staffs opinion is that the Town is not currently in a position to accept the ownership and financial management responsibilities associated with the title transfer. Town Attorney White has reviewed the agreement and recommends the following amendment to Paragraph 3.G. of the Agreement: "The terms and conditions of this Paragraph 3.G. shall supercede, replace and amend any conflicting provisions of Section 8.5 through 8.12 of the Ground Lease Agreement between the Town of Estes Park, as Landlord and Estes Park Investments, Inc., dba A-1 Trash Services, as Tenant dated December 13, 1996." Larimer County legal counsel supports the Amendment. The Committee recommends the Mayor be authorized to execute the Transfer Station Operation Agreement for a 10-year term, beginning 12/31/03 through December 31, 2013. REPORTS. Trail Projects. â€¢ Mgr. Sievers reported that the curb/gutter work on Fish Creek Rd. for the Fish Creek Tail has been completed, the bridge should be delivered within the next 2 weeks, and concrete for the bridge abutments is being poured; staff anticipates completion of the second phase this year. â€¢ Work on the W. Elkhorn portion of the Fall River Trail is nearly completed. In addition, a plague commending the James Family will soon be installed on Lot 21, Sunny Acres Addition for the easement that facilitated the Fall River Trail. Trustee Doylen emphasized the need for a Trail System Map that illustrates the Trail Master Plan, the amount of trails completed thus far, and the amount of Town-leveraged dollars expended to date. West Riverside Drive Project. The project has been completed and the street is now open for vehicular traffic. There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 8:36 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum November 20,2003 TO: Town Board 00/ FROM: Bill Linnane SUBJECT: Enos Mills Sculpture - Nov 20th PWC recommendation to Town Bd. - Request approval to locate in Bond Park Background: Miss Bonnie Fulford is the artist of the "Enos Mills and Scotch" sculpture discussed at the October 15, 2003 EPURA Board meeting and pictures of the sculpture are included. The EPURA Board recommended to the Town Board and Public Works Committee that the Enos Mills sculpture be located at the northeast comer of Bond Park. Bill Pinkham, Art Center president has been coordinating the project and was preserit at the meeting to discuss the project and answer questions. Miscellaneous costs, such as lighting, will need to be included in the fund-raising efforts organized by Mr. Pinkham and the Art Center, since the Town did not specifically budget for cost assistance with this project. The Streets and Parks staff could assist with placement of the sculpture and select all materials required to install it, such as rock base, etc. The project could begin after Thanksgiving and be completed within a week. As explained in the attached EPURA minutes, future Bond Park master plans may require relocation of the sculpture and this could be accommodated. Issues such as site suitability were discussed. The PWC recommended the Bond Park location and anticipates discussion at the Town Board level. Cost/Budget Cost: $0.00 Budget: $0.00 Action The PWC recommends the Bond Park location and due to issues mentioned above, anticipates a discussion at the Board mtg. BL/lb Attachments 2-1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, October 15, 2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the ESTES PARK URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 15th day of October 2003. Committee: Chairman Putney, Commissioners Jarolimek, Little, Steige, Swank, Wasson, Widmer Attending: All Also Attending: Executive Director Smith, Town Finance Officer Brandjordl and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent: None Chairman Putney called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. MINUTES. It was moved and seconded (Swank/Little) the minutes of the regular meeting held September 17, 2003 be approved, and it passed unanimously. COMMUNITY COMMENTS. None. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS. Commissioner Wasson reported that Qwest announced the availability of digital subscriber line (DSL) service to the Estes Park area effective October 9th. Chairman Putney acknowledged the letter from Deborah Gaddie regarding the location of a performing arts theater and explained that this was not an EPURA project. Her letter will be forwarded to the Town Board. Commissioner Steige expressed appreciation for the numerous events in September and October that should enhance sales tax revenues for the Town. U Commissioner Widmer noted that sales tax revenues for August are up 4.5% from last year. CONSIDERATION OF SITE FOR "ENOS MILLS & SCOTCH" SCULPTURE. Director Smith reviewed the sites considered for the "Enos Mills & Scotch" sculpture, to include Tallant Park, Bond Park, and the west end of Elkhorn.Ave. Completion of the sculpture is anticipated in December and a suitable location needs to be determined. Staff 2-2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority -October 15, 2003- Page 2 recommended the northeast area of Bond Park, with the understanding that when the forthcoming Master Plan for Bond Park is developed the sculpture might be relocated within Bond Park. Prior to delivery, a rock base should be installed at the preferred location to support the sculpture. Director Smith, Public Works Director Linnane, and Parks Supt. Speedlin will assist in selecting a base using dimensions provided by the Foundry. Discussion followed regarding the Bond Park Master Plan and statue placemenUmovement. Director Smith explained that the request to place the sculpture in Bond Park will be placed on the agenda for the November Public Works Committee and then proceed to Town Board for approval. Those speaking in favor of the Bond Park location included: Bill Pinkham/Art Center, Bonnie Fulford, Bob Berger, and Bud Hampton. Concluding all discussion, it was moved and seconded (Wasson/Steige) to recommend to the Town Board that the "Enos Mills & Scotch" sculpture be placed in the northeast corner of Bond Park, and it passed unanimously. RESOLUTION #339 - APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2002 AUDIT. Finance Officer Brahdjord reported that the audit report is in order, has been J cohducted according to professional accounting procedures, and reveals no problems or irregularities. Director Smith read Resolution #339 approving and accepting the fiscal year 2002 Audit completed by Swanhorst and Cutler LLC. It was moved and seconded (Swank/Little) Resolution #339 be approved as presented, and it passed unanimously. RESOLUTION #340 - APPROVAL OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA), SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT, AND SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE CONFERENCE CENTER LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. Director Smith read Resolution #340 approving the Fourth Amendment to the IGA, the Second Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement, and the Second Amendment to the Conference Center Lease Purchase Agreement. The Fourth Amendment to the IGA provides that EPURA retain an amount of the tax increment revenues necessary to pay off the bond indebtedness, provide $2,500,000 for projects, and receive $200,000 annually for basic operational expenses. The Second Amendment to the Cooperation Agreement incorporates the necessary changes to pay of the Series 1993 bonds with the proceeds of the Series 2003 bonds. The Second Amendment to the Conference Center Lease Purchase Agreement incorporates the necessary changes to reflect the terms of the Series 1993 bond refinancing with proceeds of the Series 2003 bonds. These amendments have been reviewed by the EPURA and Town Attorneys and have been recommended for approval. Doug Houston/George K. Baum & Company reported that the bonds received a bond rating of Baal and are the highest rated urban ren*val bonds in the state. 2-3 12 h ; â‚¬%9-~Â· a-- 4. '1 - er- ' S9 -- #/2,6.. -'ll-I.---1 ..V' , , --4, 2 I I Â·. I. 1 -r! I . f .r . P -tr~- -* . /4 1 - r r . 1 9- ...f . i ' -' r. *1 - 4 bÂ·' y ' . , 1- /1 - - 1 -7.,16.4 'n; ':,4.Â·Â· ..'. I. H . - , M..Al .-2 â€¢C 1 1 -"-*+ 44 -7.1 1447-*, , - ? 7. A - - 4- 4. .~la *134 4 . *t r Â· 2/ . U -- - 7.1 . 4691 . 2.,14 re .. -i . *UÂ· â‚¬- 2 ) 9* - 4 S leat.-4,2 b - ./93' . 1/ I 1 1 --7 b 1 4 111 N.; *b T â„¢.72 -1 dâ‚¬ 1 . A./ \ Ji ~ 1 3/0, /.Al rT. _.7,1 3 alli 094 " ' . -6 hill 7/.9/Im): , - , 'V I 6.Ima a râ‚¬~ 0 -1 017*040 I - :< I'.- -â€¢-8jfÂ»-1 a .;.Â£'I'"-I.*#*~I / -- : :4:7~.I--li~* 4, Â· t 1 V : ...2 -- 4 ~- 11 * Â». . F i 2-C . . '*,4- *ter -i . lt-- 1-gl *-&# --1.- 1/6/////12 . 2*h' ' Â·#Il- l.. - 4 , ./ 1 j .. 4 0 Â· 1 4 // 7- I , 1 I. . - *& f -. - -r I I > 1 ..Â®-4 .W . 0 1"/0.--......... + 0 -443 42-i 904 j 1 1 U r...i 1 t i :Il' 1 P-Il.'I-I---i. - ~ e . .... IMEE 7 . I -Il--- 98 ,. - i 1 1 1141 1 t , - .th -./, W -711.,2 1 4 .P tl a. r .~Am%; .- I. 'im -Ef' . ?SI.- .... 4 44,;,1 #.V 2, 4...4 .2- 't i 7 . /:2. --9-1'.. \2 h >,181 - . Â·A 1 24 - - Â·Â· I I - b.J . I I .:12. .44.4 /44 j *2, . 'P ... ' . # 1 ~ Â· 4. 4!L 9.4 I MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees CC: Town Administrator Widmer From: Randy Repola UE Date: November 21, 2003 Subject: 2004 Pay Plan Background: The Town's compensation policy (section attached) provides guidance on how salary increases and adjustments should be made each year. Furthermore, the policy directs that any position pay grade, which is more than 5% below the adjusted market average, should be adjusted in the fall of each year. However, in 2002 and again this year, economic conditions have been such that staff has not recommended any changes be made during the comparison year. Once again, staff recommends that adjustments indicated by market comparisons be delayed until some time after the first quarter of 2004. Based upon the 2003 salary data, seven positions meet the criteria for adjustment. Of these seven, four benchmark positions are 5% or more below the adjusted average market rate o f comparison municipalities, and the other three are linked to one of the four benchmark positions. These adjustments will be made next year contingent upon available funding. The adopted 2004 budget includes a 1.8% increase in salaries. This number corresponds to the Denver-Boulder Consumer Price Index for the first six months of 2003. In the past, the Town has allocated part ofthe pay increase to a Cost of Living Adjustment and the remainder to a merit pool to be allocated at the discretion of each department head. For 2004 a majority of the management team recommends that the merit pool be foregone and all employees be given an across-the-board increase of 1.8% of their 2003 salary. Budget/Cost: The 2004 budget includes a 1.8% increase in the salaries of all departments. Based on 2003-estimated total payroll, the approximate cost of a 1.8% increase would be $99,600. RecommendatiOn: Staff recommends a delay in adjustments as called for by the Town's compensation policy and requests consideration of a 1.8% across-the-board increase for each Town employee. individual to put forth their best efforts on the job. This means that each individual's progress on the job is reviewed regularly, recognizing the employee's achievements and suggesting areas of possible improvement. The prime responsibility for determining the amount of merit increases rests with the Town Administrator and the Department Heads, working within guidelines/limits established by the Board of Trustees. R Pay Plan All employee positions are included in the Town's classification system. Jobs are assigned various grades, based upon levels of responsibility, nature of decisions made on the job, and qualifications. Every Town employee in a particular job classification will be paid within the same grade. Employees move through their respective grades on the basis of job performance. At the discretion of the Board of Trustees, the pay plan is evaluated periodically to: (1) determine the adequacy of existing pay rates to reflect cost of living changes and other influencing factors; and (2) take into account any pertinent changes in responsibilities or qualifications that may impact the classification of a job. 1. Compensation Policy The Town of Estes Park will annually compare its salaries to market data in an effort to maintain a competitive salary structure. Furthermore, adjustments to salaries and pay grades will adhere to this policy. 7 For all positions excluding Light. and Power positions, salaries will be compared annually to a market consisting of Colorado cities and towns that are providing similar services and have a population of 15,000 to 20,000 residents. Light and Power salaries will be compared to a market consisting of Colorado cities and towns that operate a power or electric utility, and when possibleÂ·, have a population of 15,000 to 20,000 residents. Comparisons will include a factor to account for differences in housing prices. Median housing prices will be used for the current or most recent year for Estes Park and the comparison municipalities. In order to avoid lagging behind the comparison cities and towns, adjustments will be made following the market comparison. Adjustments as indicated by the market study will be made by the end of September each year. A Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) as indicated by the Denver-Boulder Consumer Price Index (CPI) as reported by the Department of Labor, will be applied to the first pay period of the following year. The COLA will be applied to all positions within the Town of Estes Park. All adjustments will be made contingent upon available funding. G Probationary Period The probationary period allows a supervisor to train, observe, and evaluate an employee's work in order to determine fitness for a position. All appointments (original, 8 Estes Park Police Department Memo To: The Honorable Mayor John Baudek and Board of Trustees Fron= Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Poll wiffi.k CC: Town Administrator Richard Widmer Date: 11/19/2003 Re: Minor Drivers License Revocation for Drug Use or Possession Background Staff researched Colorado Statutes regarding the revocation of a minor's driver's license if arrested and convided of drug possession or use. This information was forwarded to the Colorado Municipal League and the Colorado Chiefs of Police Assodation for review and research. Each entity reported back stating there was pre-existing law enacted in 2000 allowing Municipal Courts to enforce revocation of a minor's driver license if convicted of possession or use of a drug. In consultation with Town Attorney White new Municipal Ordinances were drafted allowing for enforcement and adjudication through the Town of Estes Park Municipal Court. Budget/Cost No costs associated with this enforcement adivity. Recommendation Staff recommends the Town Board adopt the ordinances presented allowing Town of Estes Park Police Officers to enforce these ordinances. 1 ...23'a,> ORDINANCE NO. 19-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.28.100 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK AS THE SAME RELATES TO MARIHUANA AND THE ADDITION OF SECTION 9.28.150 WITH REGARD TO SENTENCING FOR POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: Section 9.28.100 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park shall be amended to read as follows: 9.28.100 Possession or use of Marihuana (a.) It is unlawful for any person to possess less than one (1) ounce of marihuana or marijuana concentrate. (b.) It is unlawful for any person to openly and publicly display, consume or use not more than one ounce of marijuana or marijuana concentrate. (c.) Marihuana or marijuana means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not, the seeds, the resin extracted from any part of the plant, and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture or preparation of the plant, its seeds or its resin. It does not include fiber produced from the stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, or sterilized seed of the plant which is incapable of germination, if these items exist apart from any other item defined as marihuana. Marihuana does not include marihuana concentrate as defined in this Section. (d.) Marihuana concentrate means hashish, tetrahydrocannabinols, or any alkaloid, salt, derivative, preparation, compound or mixture, whether natural or synthesized, of tetrahydrocannabinols. (e.) A person may possess, display, consume or use marihuana or marijuana concentrate if said person is or under the direction of a person licensed or authorized by law to prescribe, administer or dispense marihuana or marijuana concentrate for bonafide medical needs. 1 Section 2 Section 9.28 of the Municipal Code is amended by the addition of Section 9.28.150 Sentencing to read as follows: 9.28.150 Sentencing (a.) .Immediately upon a plea of guilty or no contest (except when such a plea is entered in conjunction with a deferred sentence), or a verdict of guilty by the court or jury, to a violation of Section 9.28.100(a.) or (b.), by a minor driver in addition to any other penalty, the court shall require the offender to immediately surrender his or her minor driver's or provisional driver's license to the court. The court shall forward to the Colorado Department of Revenue a notice of conviction, together with the offender's license, not later than ten (10) days after the conviction becomes final. (b.) It is unlawful for any minor driver to fail to surrender his or her license to the court within three (3) days of his or her plea of guilty or no contest, or verdict of guilty to a violation of Section 9.28.100 (a.) or (b.). (c.) The court may, in its discretion and as part of the sentence to be imposed, require a person convicted of violating any portion of this Chapter to complete court-approved public service in an amount to be set by the court Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor 1 ATTEST: Town Clerk 2 Estes Park Police Department Memo To: The Honorable Mayor John Baudek and Town Board of Trustees Fron= Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police 30 4 CC: Town Administrator Richard Widmer Date: 11/19/2003 Re General Agreement Between Rocky Mountain National Park and the Town of Estes Park Background The Rocky Mountain National Park and the Town of Estes Park Police Department provide Mutual Aid for law enforcement services. The Estes Park Police and the Rocky Mountain National Park Rangers mutually share in the following resources; communications, enforcement assistance, provide resources for emergency situations and share training resources. A review of this agreement was completed by Town Attorney White identifying no legal issues in regards to this agreement. The agreement intends to remain in place for fve years. Budget/Cost None Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this agreement. 1 AGREEMENT NO. G1520040002 General Agreement Between the National Park Service (Rocky Mountain National Park) And The Town of Estes Park, Colorado This agreement is entered into by the United States Department of Interior, National Park Service (hereinafter "NPS"), acting through the Superintendent of Rocky Mountain National Park, and Estes Park, Colorado, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado (hereinafter the "Town"). The purpose of this agreement is to establish the terms and conditions under which the parties will provide mutual law enforcement assistance in and near Rocky Mountain National Park. ARTICLE I-BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES As used in this agreement: The term Rocky Mountain National Park encompasses the area authorized by Title 16 United States Code Â§ 191. The term Park Ranger refers to a person designated by the Secretary of Interior, per 16 USC Â§ la-6 (b), to "...maintain law and order and protect persons and property within areas of the National Park System." Rangers so designated are commonly referred to as "commissioned rangers." The term Estes Park Police Officer, or Officer, refers to persons designated by the Town to perform law enforcement within the territorial jurisdiction of Estes Park, Colorado. The term lead agency refers to the agency with primary responsibility for law enforcement activity in the referenced geographic area. The term cooperating agency refers to the agency without primary responsibility, i.e. the agency providing assistance to the lead agency. Whereas, the following authorities are relevant to the National Park Service: 1. The United States Department of Interior, National Park Service (NPS) manages Rocky Mountain National Park pursuant to Title 16 United States Code Â§ 1 et seq. 2. 16 USC Â§ 1(b) (1) authorizes the Secretary of Interior to render "emergency rescue, fire fighting, and cooperative assistance to nearby law enforcement and fire prevention agencies and for related purposes outside of the National Park System." 3. The Federal Law Enforcement Officer' 6 Good Samaritan Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-277, Title VI, section 627) provides important, but limited, liability protection when NPS officers are involved in certain situations outside the park. This act does not convey any law enforcement authority. Whereas, the National Park Service and the Town of Estes Park have determined that providing mutual law enforcement assistance will be mutually advantageous and is in the public interest, and Whereas, it is their mutual desire to work in harmony and to cooperate in the use of equipment and trained personnel where threats to human life and property arise within their respective jurisdictions, and Whereas, staffing levels at Rocky Mountain National Park cannot be significantly augmented by officers from other federal agencies in a timely manner, and In order to accomplish the above stated objectives and to set forth in specific manner a cooperative law enforcement mutual aid and assistance agreement which will be equally beneficial to both parties, as follows: ARTICLE II-STATEMENT OF WORK A. Law Enforcement Operations within the Park 1. We mutually understand and agree that the NPS has primary responsibility for maintaining law and order and for the protection of persons, property and resources upon park lands and that it cannot delegate that responsibility to a State or local agency. 2. In fesponse to a request from the NPS, Estes Park Police Department agrees to provide available law enforcement personnel and/or equipment, which can be reasonably made available without jeopardizing police operations. 3. Cooperate in the formulation and application of practical plans and programs for the handling of law enforcement and emergency situations. 4. Work jointly on matters pertaining to radio communications and dispatching, training, exchange of law enforcement information, prevention of incidents and violations, natural disasters and public safety concerns. 5. Provide applicable reports of case incidents which occur within NPS jurisdiction in a timely manner to the investigating officer. 6. Estes Park Police Officers will be designated as Special Policemen in accordance with 16 USC Â§ la-6(b) and, when supplementing the NPS, exercise the same powers and authorities delegated to Park Rangers in 16 USC Â§ la-6(b), (1) to (3). Having determined it economical and in the public interest, the National Park Service hereby deputizes officers of Estes Park as Special Policemen pursuant to the following conditions: a. Estes Park agrees with the deputation by signing this agreement. b. The deputation is contingent upon the approval of the Law Enforcement Administrator, WASO-RAD. c. The deputation applies only to Estes Park Police officers who meet and maintain all applicable State and local peace officer standards and training requirements. Estes Park Police Officers who meet the criteria established in this agreement will be considered National Park Service Special Policemen. No special identification will be provided. d. The deputation is valid for five years and runs concurrently with this general agreenlent. e. Special Policeman authority shall be exercised onlv upon a request for assistance from the National Park Service and shall cease when that request is withdrawn or cancelled. f. Special Policeman authority shall only be exercised in furtherance of the mission identified by the National Park Service and shall extend only so far as may be necessary to faithfully complete that mission. g. Special Policemen will comply with NPS policies and procedures when serving in that capacity and will report all actions taken under that authority in accordance with NPS procedures. h. Special police deputation does not confer upon the holder, status as a federal employee, except as provided in the General Authorities Act. B. Law Enforcement Operations within the Town 1. We mutually understand and agree that the Estes Park Police Department has primary responsibility for maintaining law and order and for the protection of persons, property and resources within Estes Park. 2. We mutually understand and agree that Park Rangers have the authority to execute warrants and other process issued by a competent jurisdiction for offenses committed in Rocky Mountain National Park. 3. We mutually understand and agree that Park Rangers have the authority to conduct investigations in Estes Park for offenses committed in Rocky Mountain National Park. 4. The National Park Service agrees to provide law enforcement assistance, which is lirnited to only those actions/efforts that support or assist the Estes Park Police Department. Emergency cooperative assistance provided to hearby law enforcement and emergency services agencies must be at the request of the receiving agency, have a clear nexus to the park and be approved by the participating employee's supervisor. 5. Applicable reports of case incidents which occur within town jurisdiction will be provided in a timely manner to the investigating officer. 6. Work jointly on matters pertaining to radio communications and dispatching, training, exchange of law enforcement information, prevention of incidents and violations, natural disasters and public safety concerns. 7. Cooperate in the formulation and application of practical plans and programs for the handling of law enforcement and emergency situations. C. Requests for Assistance 1. Unless exigent circumstances preclude it, we agree that the lead agency will generally request assistance from the cooperating agency in one or more of the following manners: a. Verbally from Officer to Ranger and vice versa, including from supervisor to supervisor. b. Verbally, from Communications Center to Communications Center. c. Verbally, from Officer/Ranger or supervisor to Communications Center. d. In the case of planned events, a request for assistance shall be made in advance and in writing to the responsible agency' s chief law enforcement officer. 2. Officers and Park Rangers are responsible for notifying their respective Communications Center or supervisor that a request for assistance has been made or received. Communications Centers are responsible for notifying appropriate supervisory personnel within their agency. D. Command and Control of a Mutual Aid Incident 1. We agree that the Incident Commander of the lead agency shall be in command of all Officers/Rangers who are rendering emergency or supplemental assistance. 2. We agree, whenever feasible, to use Officers/Rangers from the cooperating agency in a support role. When possible, we agree to: a. Assign assisting Officers/Rangers to one or more Officers/Rangers of the lead agency. b. Incorporate an Officer/Ranger, preferably a supervisor, from the cooperating agency as an agency representative in the incident command structure of the lead agency. 3. We mutually agree to conduct joint reviews of mutual aid incidents, when appropriate. 4. We agree that Estes Park Police Officers and National Park Rangers shall be subject to the laws, regulations and policies of their respective agency. 5. We agree that Estes Park Police Officers and National Park Rangers of the cooperating agency who are rendering assistance pursuant to this agreement shall be deemed to be acting within the scope of their employment and subject to the laws, regulations and policies of their respective agency. 6. Command and control of law enforcement incidents in Rocky Mountain National Park will utilize the Incident Command System (ICS). E. Compensation 1. We agree that Estes Park Police Officers and National Park Rangers shall not receive any monetary compensation for services rendered except through their respective agency. 2. Each party shall bear its own costs for furnishing services under this agreement, and neither party shall collect reimbursement for those costs from the other. 3. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to bind either party to expend in any one fiscal year any sum in excess of funds appropriated by its governing body or allocated by the party for the purpose of this agreement. 4. To the extent permitted by applicable law, each party hereby waives any and all claims, demands and causes of action against the other party and its employees, and releases the other party and its employees from any and all liability for any loss, damage, personal injury or death, arising out of or resulting from activities under this agreement. Each party shall be solely responsible for any and all claims, demands and causes of action filed by third parties arising out of or resulting from the activities of its employees under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the costs of investigating and defending against such claims, demands and causes of action and the costs of paying any compromise settlements, judgement, assessed costs, or fees (including attorney's fees). 5. The parties agree and understand that the Town is relying on and does not waive by any provision of this Agreement, the monetary limitations or terms (presently $150,000 per person and $600,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities and protections provided by the Colorado Government Immunity Act, Section 24- 10-101 CRS as from time to time amended or otherwise available to the Town or any of its officers, agents or employees. F. Miscellaneous Provisions 1. We agree to authorize the use of radio frequencies by the other agency for mutual aid incidents. 2. The Estes Park Police Department agrees to provide off-hours radio dispatch for the NPS. 3. We agree to cooperate and share law enforcement training opportunities. ARTICLE III-TERM OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall be effective for a period of five years from the date of final signature, unless it is terminated earlier by one of the parties pursuant to ARTICLE VIII below. Nothing in this agreement shall preclude either party from entering into similar agreements with other law enforcement agencies. ARTICLE IV-KEY OFFICIALS All notices regarding this agreement shall be directed to the following key official(s) for each party: For National Park Service: Superintendent ~ Vaughn L. Baker Assistant Superintendent Anthony J. Schetzsle Chief Park Ranger Joseph R. Evans For Estes Park: Mayor John Baudek Chief of Police Lowell C. Richardson ARTICLE V-PROPERTY UTILIZATION Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, any property furnished by one party to the other shall remain the property of the furnishing agency. Any property furnished by the NPS to Estes Park shall be used and disposed of as set forth in the NPS Property Management Regulations. ARTICLE VI-PRIOR APPROVAL Not applicable ARTICLE VII-REPORTS AND/OR OTHER DELIVERABLES Upon request and to the full extent permitted by applicable law, the parties shall share with each other, final reports of incidents involving both parties. ARTICLE VIII-MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION Only a written instrument executed by both parties may modify this agreement. Either party may terminate this agreement by providing the other party with 60 days advance written notice. ARTICLE IX-STANDARD CLAUSES A. Civil Rights During the performance of this agreement, the parties agree to abide by the terms of the USDI-Civil Rights Assurance Certification, non-discrimination, and will not discriminatd against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. B. Officials Not to Benefit No member or delegate to congress, or resident Commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this agreement, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom, but this provision shall not be construed to extend to this agreement if made with a corporation for its general benefit. C. Promotions Neither party shall publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional material, which states or implies governmental, departmental, bureau or government employee endorsement of a product, service, or position. D. Public Information Release The Town must obtain prior government approval from the Chief Park Ranger for any public information release, which refers to the Department of Interior, or to any bureau, park unit, or employee (by name or title), or to this agreement. The specific text, layout, photographs, etc. of the proposed release must be submitted with the request of approval. The NPS must obtain prior government approval from Estes Park for any public information release, which refers to Estes Park or any employee (by name or title), or to this agreement. The specific text, layout, photographs, etc. of the proposed release must be submitted with the request of approval. ARTICLE X-SIGNATURES In witness hereof, the following authorized representatives of the parties have signed their names on the dates indicated below, thereby executing this agreement. 1Â»d 1, 6 c.,aÂ«'Â»- &(113 103 Chief P#k I*nker Date' Rocky Niountain National Park 4.L Lfun U -14 - 01 SuperinAdent Date Rocky Mountain National Park Chief of Police Date Estes Park, CO Mayor Date Estes Park, CO Estes Park Police Department Memo To: The Honorable John Baudek and Board of Trustees 1,1 Fron= Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police - CC: Town Administrator Richard Widmer Date. 11/14/2003 Re Larimer County Department of Human Services IGA Background Anytime the police department refers a juvenile for services or takes a juvenile into custody for a serious violent felony crime they must be processed through the Larimer County Human Services Department Juvenile Assessment Center, more commonly known as the HUB. The juvenile goes through a screening process performed by staff members of the Larimer County HUB. Once the screening process is completed a disposition is reached concerning the juvenile, services are rendered or in some cases the juvenile is placed in a juvenile detention fadlity. Once a juvenile is placed into a detention facility certain costs are affixed to a juvenile arrestee. One of the costs most commonly associated with these type of juvenile cases is transportation to the detention facility and to from court. When a law enforcement agency uses the Larimer County HUB to provide services for a juvenile a service fee is affixed to the agency requesting sen,ices the fee for these services is based on prior history. Earlier this year the Larimer County.HUB acquired transportation services through a third party. The transportation costs associated with this third party transportation company are being passed on to all law enforcement agencies. Police Department staff participated in the development of this IGA and negotiated a set fee based on the needs of Estes Park Police Department. In part, the police department will pay for only court transport fees and those times when we refer a juvenile to the Larimer County HUB. Budget/Cost Based upon the estimated costs provided by the Larimer County Human Services Department the costs are expected not to exceed $531.00 for referral services and $200.00 for court transportation fees for 2003, total amount is $731.00. Future budgets could increase 10% annually therefore future budgets for this line will increase accordingly. Recomrnendation This IGA has been reviewed by Town Attorney White who reports there are no issues regarding this document. Staffdoes recommend approval ofthe presented IGA. 1 2003 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT CONCERNING LARIMER COUNTY JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER AKA THE HUB AND JUVENILE TRANSPORT SERVICES This agreement is made between the Board o f County Commissioners of Larimer County, Colorado (County), the City of Fort Collins (Fort Collins), City of Loveland (Loveland), the Town of Estes Park (Estes), the Town ofBerthoud (Berthoud), the Colorado State University Police Department (CSU), and the Larimer County Sheriff's Department (Sheriff) referred to collectively hereafter as "Law Enforcement". I. RECITALS 1. The County owns certain property located at 2555 Midpoint Drive, Suite F, Fort Collins, Colorado, which property is currently used and known as "The Hub". 2. The County has expended funds and will continue to expend funds for ongoing operational costs (including personnel) and maintenance of The Hub. 3. Staff of Larimer County Department ofHuman Services are located in The Hub, including dedicated Hub staff (intake specialists) as well as the Adolescent Response Team, the Family Assessment Intake Team (After Hours Unit), and the Youth Offender Response Team. 4. The purpose of The Hub is: To function as a coordinated multi-agency program which contributes to the safety of youth, families, and the community through rapid, thorough assessment; early intervention; and improved access to appropriate services. Services include: â€¢ Detention screening â€¢ Comprehensive family and child assessment for at-risk youth â€¢ Early intervention and referral to appropriate community services On-site services may also include individual and family counseling and multi-disciplinary staffing. The Hub is designed to serve families of youth aged 10 to 18 who are facing the following issues: â€¢ Delinquent youth â€¢ Non-detainable youth offenders â€¢ Mental health emergencies for youth â€¢ Drug and alcohol abuse , â€¢ Youth beyond control of their parents â€¢ Parent/child conflicts â€¢ Runaways 5. Juveniles brought to The Hub by Law Enforcement, including juveniles from the unincorporated areas of Larimer County, receive services through The Hub, which services benefit each Law Enforcement entity and promote the welfare and safety of the citizens in their jurisdictions. 1 6. In exchange for future services received by Law Enforcement through The Hub, the parties have agreed that it is appropriate and fair that Law Enforcement contribute to the County's . cost for operation and maintenance of The Hub and for the cost oftheir share ofjuvenile transports. 7. Part 2 ofArticle 1 of Title 29, C.R.S., authorizes local government to cooperate and contract with one another to provide any function, service or facility lawfully authorized to each, including sharing of costs. 8. The parties desire to cooperate and contract with one another concerning the operating and maintenance of The Hub and transportation of at-risk juveniles and juveniles in custody of Law Enforcement officers, and the sharing of the costs for the same, as set forth in this Agreement. II. TERMS In consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 9. County Operation of The Hub The County agrees to operat& The Hub for the purposes set forth in Paragraph 4, above, at 2555 Midpoint Drive, Suite F, Fort Collins, Colorado, during the term of this Agreement. The Hub will be open and available for Law Enforcement officers to bring juveniles in custody, alleged juvenile offenders, or at-risk youth in need of services. The Hub will be open to such Law Enforcement officers and staffed by qualified intake specialists twenty- four hours per day, seven days a week, throughout each calendar year. In the event of severe inclement weather or other emergency, the County may not be able to provide services; if a decision is made that Hub staff cannot provide any services or must restrict services, Hub staffwill notify all Law Enforcement agencies. 10. Operating Costs A. For each calendar year, each Law Enforcement entity shall pay its contribution to the Larimer County Department of Human Services in one lump sum on or before June 30th each year for The Hub estimated operating expenses for that year. The County will bill Law Enforcement each year for the new calendar year id December or January. The respective shares of the costs for each entity shall be determined based upon the most recent set of referral data available at the time the costs are calculated and projected. Every attempt will be made to include a full 12 months of the most recent referral data. Each participating entity will be charged for their share of referrals as a percentage of all referrals by participating Law Enforcement. B. The operating costs of The Hub that shall be shared on a pro rata basis by Law Enforcement shall include, but are not limited to, such expenses as office supplies; food supplies (for the juveniles); dues & subscriptions/publications; staff mileage; shredding costs; small equipment; occupancy costs of rent or use allowance & interest, utilities, 2 repair & maintenance, including alterations, and custodial; telephone and Internet access costs, copier costs & duplication, postage, monitoring of the security system and computer equipment & software. Law Enforcement entities have indicated that they will provide Hub staff with Peace Officer handbooks at no charge. Fort Collins Police Department will provide 3 Peace Officer handbooks to the Hub each year and that Loveland Police Department provides at least 2 Peace Officer handbooks to the Hub at no charge each year. No costs for any Hub personnel shall be considered part of The Hub operating costs for the purposes o f this agreement. Also there are no administrative staff costs assigned to The Hub expenses for purposes of this agreement. C. The County shall provide to Law Enforcement a projected budget for The Hub operating costs by May of each year for the next calendar year, including the County's pro rata share calculations for each entity and each entity's dollar share o f the projected operating costs. D. In the event that an individual entity questions or disputes the amount ofthat party's contribution, that party shall so notify the County in writing within ten days of receipt of the budget information. Upon receipt of any notice of questions or dispute, the County shall schedule a meeting with the party as soon as practicable to discuss and attempt to resolve the questions or dispute. E. Due to requests by Law Enforcement for their budget planning purposes to have fixed operating costs for any specific calendar year, the parties agree that no adjustment will be made to the projected operating budget once all parties have been billed in December or January with the exception of increases or reductions in costs as stated in (IF), For informational purposes only, a report will be communicated to all parties showing the original proj ected budget with the actual expenditures alongside by the end o f April each year for the preceding year. F. The County may, upon occasion, elect to modify the original proposed budget if it becomes apparent that the original projected costs will be at least 10% less. The parties will be notified as soon as possible in writing of any decrease (of 10% or more) to the proposed budget and their share of the revised budget. If they have already paid their share, the County shall refund any overcharge based on the revised budget. The County may, upon occasion, elect to modify the original proposed budget if it becomes apparent that the original projected costs will be at least 10% more. The parties will be notified as soon as possible in writing of any changes to the proposed budget and their share of the revised budget. If they have already paid their share, the County will bill them for additional costs. Any time the operating budget is revised, the most recent 12 months of referral information will be used to calculate the revised share of expenses attributable to each Law Enforcement entity. 11. Transport Services Juveniles screened by The Hub at the request of Law Enforcement who are determined to need secure detention shall be transported to a detention or secure facility by Community Corrections personnel. Juveniles may also be transported to other facilities to receive services, such as Mountain Crest, when determined by HUB staff to be in the best interest of the juvenile. In the event of severe inclement weather or other emergency, the County may not be able to provide transportation services; if a decision is made that Community 3 Corrections staff cannot provide transportation services, Hub staff will notify all Law Enforcement agencies. If the County provides such transport, the party whose Law Enforcement agency requested the screening shall pay to Larimer County Community Corrections a transport fee for each trip. Said rate to be assessed in the manner set forth in paragraph 12 below. Juveniles will also be transported by Community Corrections from detention facilities to' their first & subsequent court appearances. The requesting jurisdiction shall not be liable for damage or injury resulting from or associated with the transportation of any such juvenile or welfare or treatment of any such juveniles during the course of said transportation; provided, however, that the County shall not be liable for damage or injury resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of any person or entity other than the County. Any such transportation services shall be provided in accordance with all applicable laws. One trip is generally defined as a one-way transport. A transport is transportation provided for one juvenile either to detention or to another designated location. 12. Transport Fees Transport fees will be assessed based on each eligible trip provided for a juvenile. The fees to be charged for each trip will depend on the costs incurred by Community Corrections. Community Corrections agrees to notify each Law Enforcement entity of the number of juveniles transported each month on their behalf. The cost per trip (i.e. the rate structure for transports) will initially be set as indicated on the transport fee schedule listed below and will be effective for transports made starting January 1, 2003. Community Corrections will bill Law Enforcement monthly for transports made in each preceding month and will include the dates of transports, destinations, and juveniles names (& birth-dates where possible). Each year in May, Community Corrections will present a projected transportation charging structure to Law Enforcement for the next calendar year which will be in effect for that next calendar year and will be based on actual costs of the current year and projected costs of the next year. Community Corrections reserves the right to review the costs of transport every 6 months for the first two years of this Agreement and make adjustments to the fee structure to cover the costs and projected costs of the transportation provided. Any change in the fee structure shall be negotiated with and communicated to Law Enforcement. Standard Transport Fee Schedule Law Enforcement Entity Emergency Transport lst Court Return Ft. Collins PD, Loveland PD, $368 Included Berthoud PD, Colo. State Univ. Colo. State Patrol, Estes PD NA $100 Fees are based on each juvenile transported; special rates apply for emergency transports of more than one juvenile in the same vehicle at the same time for the same Law Enforcement agency: $268 for 1St juvenile, $100 for each additional juvenile & $100 for each 1St court return; for example for 2 juveniles transported at the same time for the same Law Enforcement agency the total fee would be $568 instead of $736. 4 1, 1 13. Effective Date This Agreement will be effective January 1, 2003 and will continue for five (5) years unless terminated or amended. 14. Termination Any party may terminate their participation in this agreement for any reason by providing notice to all other parties, in writing, at least sixty (60) days prior to January 1St of each year, but no sooner than ninety (90) days prior to January 1St of each year. 15. Records The County shall keep for a period o f no less than three (3) years records sufficient to accurately document operating costs for The Hub, payments received from participating jurisdictions, total number of youth served, number of youth served on behalf o f each party, number of youth transported on behalf of each party, date of transport and return, and place to which transported. The County shall allow any of the parties to inspect and/or copy such records upon reasonable notice. 16. Notices All notices should be sent to the parties & addresses below: To Larimer County: The Hub - Director 2555 Midpoint Drive, Suite F Fort Collins, CO 80524 To Fort Collins: To Fort Collins: City Manager- John F. Fishbach Lt. Tom McLellan P.O. Box 580 300 LaPorte Avenue 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins Police Department Fort Collins, CO 80522 Fort Collins, CO 80521 To Loveland: To Loveland: City Manager-Don Williams Police Chief Tom Wagoner 500 East Third Street 810 E 10th St, Suite 100 Loveland, CO 80537 Loveland, CO 80537 To Berthoud: Chief o f Police-Chief William Wegener 328 Massachusetts Avenue P.O. Box 1229 Berthoud, CO 80513 To Larimer County Sheriff: Sheriff Jim Alderden 2501 Midpoint Drive 5 . Fort Collins, CO 80525 To Estes Park: Commander Gregg Filsinger 170 McGregor Ave P.O. Box 1287 Town of Estes Park Police Department Estes Park, CO 80517 To Colorado State University: Captain Bob Chaffee Colorado State University Police Department Fort Collins, CO 80525--6023 To Colorado State Patrol: Captain Bob Parish Colorado State Patrol 3832 S. I-25 Fort Collins, CO 80525 17. Default If a party fails or refused to perform according to the terms of this Agreement, such party may be declared in default. In the event that a party is declared to be in default, such defaulting party shall be allowed a period of ten days within which to cure said default. In the event the default remains uncorrected, the party declaring default may seek damages or avail itself of any other remedy at law or equity. 18. Assignment/No Third Party Beneficiaries No party shall assign, transfer or other convey any of its interest, rights or obligations in this Agreement without the written consent of the other parties. This agreement is made for the sole and exclusive benefit ofthe parties hereto and shall not be constrded to be an agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties and no third party shall have a right of action hereunder for any cause whatsoever. 19. Governing Law & Governmental Immunity This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws o f the State of Colorado. To the extent permitted by law, and consistent with the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act (C.R.S. 24-10-101, et seq.), the parties hereby indemnify and hold harmless the others from any loss, liability or damage, including attorneys' fees that each party may incur arising out of any negligent acts or omissions of the others,in performing their duties under this agreement. No term or condition in this agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any provision of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act for any party. 6 20. Annual Appropriation The parties acknowledge that the operation of The Hub by the County and the obligation of Law Enforcement to contribute to operating costs and pay transport fees are subject to each party's annual budgeting and appropriation of funds to operate The Hub and provide or pay for transport. The County may discontinue such services and terminate this Agreement if it does not have sufficient funds. If the Law Enforcement parties do not budget and appropriate sufficient funds to contribute to operating costs and transport fees, this Agreement shall terminate as to such entity. Upon such termination, the County shall be paid for services rendered to such entity prior to the date of termination, and shall have no obligation to further provide services to such entity's youth. 21. Severability - All portions o f this Agreement are severable. If one or more portions of this Agreement are found to be unlawful, against public policy or unenforceable, the remaining portions of this Agreement shall be unaffected and remain in full force and effect. 22. Amendment This Agreement may be amended upon agreement of the parties, provided such amendment is in writing and signed by all parties gr the parties to which the amendment applies. 23. Entire Agreement This Agreement states the entire agreement of the parties and all prior oral or written representations or agreements between the parties are merged into and superceded by the express terms of this Agreement. The rest of this page is left blank on purpose. 7 26. Counterpart Signatures The parties agree that counterpart signatures (each party will have a separate signature page) ofthis Agreement shall be acceptable and that execution of the Agreement in the same form by each and every party shall be deemed to constitute full and final execution of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by the parties' duly authorized representatives as set forth below. Board of County Commissioners of Larimer County, Colorado Attest: By: Thomas G. Bender, Chair Deputy Clerk to the Board Date: Approved as to Form: 171 4 -n h Town of Estes Park, Colorado ~stant County Alâ€¢flfiley 0 By: Attest: Date: Town Clerk Approved as to Form: 10 . Town Clerk's Office Memo TO: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Date: November 18, 2003 Re: Liquor License Occupation Tax - Proposed Fee Increase Background The Town assesses a liquor occupation tax fee to all liquor licensees. The fee varies depending upon the liquor license category. The Clerk's Office manages 59 liquor licenses, an all-time high. Processing includes new licenses, transfers of ownership, renewals, manager registration, modification of premises, corporation officer changes, trade name changes, changes of location, temporary permits, special event permits, bed & breakfast permits, Liquor Show Cause Hearings, and T.I.P.S. training coordination. The occupation tax provides funding for all processing that occurs with these licenses. The most recent fee increase occurred in August, 1997, and research of Loveland, Ft. Collins, Greeley and Boulder was conducted (see Page 2). Research not only verified that the Town's fees are significantly below front-range municipalities, it confirmed that these municipalities assess a fee for Special Event Liquor Permits. The graph on Page 2 includes the Town's current and proposed fees. The majority of liquor occupation fees were increased 20%. The graph also includes the implementation of a $10.00/day fee for Special Events that serve 3.2% beer, and $25.00/day for Special Events that serve malt, vinous, and spirituous liquor. These license fees are contained in the Liquor License Procedure Manual, and the effective date is January 1, 2004. Budget The fee increase will generate an increase of approximately $6,254 in the 2004 Budget. Action The Town Clerk's Office requests your approval to increase Liquor Occupation Tax Fees and implementation of fees for Special Events Permits as detailed on Page 2, effective January 1, 2004. 1 . t . LIQUOR OCCUPATION TAX FRONT-RANGE MUNICIPALITY RESEARCH DATA LIQUOR ESTES ESTES LICENSE PARK PARK CATEGORY LOVELAND FT. GREELEY BOULDER COLLINS CURRENT PROPOSt I BREW PUB ? $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $3,253.00 $620.00 $870.00 (manufacturer, distributor, retailer) HOTEL & $550.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $3,253.00 $620.00 $744.00 RESTAURANT TAVERN $670.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $3,253.00 $620.00 $744.00 BEER & WINE $300.00 $800.00 $600.00 $1,085.00 $470.00 $564.00 CLUB $550.00 $800.00 $500.00 $1,284.00 $470.00 $564.00 DRUGSTORE $670.00 $750.00 $500.00 $988.50 $470.00 $564.00 LIQUOR $670.00 $750.00 $500.00 $988.50 $470.00 $564.00 STORE 3.2% BEER, $300.00 $750.00 -- $400.00 $375.00 $450.00 On Premise 3.2% BEER, Off Premise $550.00 $750.00 $250.00 $275.00 $375.00 $450.00 3.2% BEER, $550.00 $750.00 $500.00 $400.00 $375.00 $450.00 On/Off Premise SPECIAL $10.00/day $25.00/day $10.00/day $35.00/day -0- $10.00/day EVENTS - 3.2% BEER SPECIAL $25.00/day $25.00/day $25.00/day $25.00/day -0- $25.00/day EVENTS - LIQUOR ARTS $150.00 $500.00 $1,284.00 $150.00 $150.00 â€¢ Page 2 j 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 OP r-11=000.55Lor-1 E N Or-1 (N ,-1 (N O -1 â€¢-1 lilli 09 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 OW 0\0 0\0 0\0 .\O ow ./low .\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 OLor-14{O1O3LDS, ,-14,10*101/01Lt,r-1 *9 77TT 01 Ul .-1 %00.LOLO#)00 1111'111 ow ew O\0 0\D ow 00 09 09 0\0 cAo 0\0 de & .W dp & 01 d~0 01(Ng'LOLOLOLD h m N In r-1 M Lfl 01 5 u â€¢44 00 m f m w h Mt~LOG'191'Et'imt'=14 r-1 r-1 1 I r-1 r-1 Illtl O\Â° O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0\0 0\0 0\0 O\9 0\0 O\0 0\0 0\0 op OrÂ·~InGâ€¢~04'le(N 91'Pr-10.1-1(NLOr-1 ChLOr-110(Nul>LI) O 41 0 0 r-1 0 N m O 1 09) 1 * 1 1 .-1 1 3 - 010 0\0 010 0\0 09 09 0\0 0\0 010 0\00\00\OOPOWOWO\00\007 (N O LD % 94 Lf) 0 09 h (NOWL.0(NOftÂ·Â·Â·-Ch rÂ·-1[-Â·~ror.341)0141,-1 ,-Immr-loowooo 11(NIT-1 * 111 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 09 0\0 0/0 09 09 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 O\0 C\O 4 00 3 : r-1 911 5 41 1-0 0 0000(NOcor-rococo 4 0 . 01 .0 â€¢-1 41 0 41 el oforomimmo rio 8111111 1-1 1 64 AmEMEnESS - --*p-- --- 52 LCD ,-1 CO LD W N '.0 4 CO 04 00 r-' b rn ul W 0 00 4 0~ 00 MOO 1-1 01 O r-1 8 1 1 1-1 2.1 111 32 0 6 4 & e ow ow & ow ow * S ow ow ow ow o\Â° ow & o\Â° O..LD[~ma~CONALD 0 0,-cONO,-10000Â«1 OW.... ....... COr--1 Ch / O LO LO CO 4 1-1 ' ' 00 in o el 1-1 m â€¢-1 (4 1 4 I r-4 I r--1 001 0 11 20 1 m 4 Z C:4 -0 0,0 0\0 0\0 0\0 OW 0\0 0\0 0\0 .\0 0\. , 0\/ 0,0 dp ow c\P dp ow cho ow E-1 Lf,Lf-,Lfloo(91.OW,~0[~O E-1 LOr-INr-lulâ€¢-Im(Nr-1 .......... t-Unt.r,Or-iLDInt-OUI 5.-1.-11-IONOr-Ir-1 lili r.1 lilli 0\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 00 0\0 h,-11.nellÂ©LA\01.091101 t-(100110,-ILD[Nul ......... a 591'00001.DMLOChrn p.)GoomoOMâ€¢-10 1 1 Bl m . r-101(NIr-It 911 ,-11111111 11 1 M M W Z â€¢21 CD DIE-1 > U DIE-41 > U REMQ:ZER,=82: Reammeem= U O [13 O Z C . ZLEIsang XYM SE'IVS VISITS US 34 RETAIL ACCOM REST GROC DONS Q WOODY gIYZEZI 'IVIOM 'nrOOM DE sn SMISIA -22.6 SALES TAX ECONOMIC INDICATORS 2003 - 2002 NTHLY % 0/4 a.1.Â¥rl-O 1 ->lvq A V/N tr/N -*E Z %1.E 0.4% . 3.1