The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 2003-07-22't Prepared 07/17/03 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park ie to plan and provide reliable, hi0h-value services for our citizerte, visitors, ariel employees. We take 0reat pride eneurind and enhancind the quality of life in our community by bein0 0ood etewarde of public resources and naturalÂ· eettinG. NitlIeN>' BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, July 22,2003 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated July 8,2003. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Utilities, July 10,2003: 1. *Homeowner Request to Underground Electric Service at Town Expense - See Action Item #1 below. 2. 2002 West Wonderview Loop Project: E-Z Excavating Change Order, $7,703.80. B. Public Works, July 17, 2003: 1. 2003 Street Overlay Project Award to Coulson Excavating, $196,780. 2. Knoll-Willows Trail - Construction of "Test Section", $10,000. 3. Fish Creek Trail Project: G. L. Hoff Change Order, $9,400. 4. Estes Valley Development Code, Block 6 Amendments - CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUGUST 12, 2003. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. *HOMEOWNER REQUEST TO UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AT TOWN EXPENSE, REFERRED TO TOWN BOARD BY UTILITIES COMMITTEE 7/10/03. 2. DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENSION FOR POSSESSION AND USE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - REQUEST TOWN BOARD SUPPORT FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE CML POLICY COMMITTEE. Trustee Gillette and Police Chief Richardson. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE #10-03 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE MODEL TRAFFIC CODE FOR COLORADO, REVISED 2003. Police Chief Richardson. A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #10-03 D. Public Testimony E. Mayor - Close Public Hearing F. Motion to Approve/Deny. 1 4. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 8,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 8th day of July, 2003. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W. Gillette David Habecker G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: Lori Jeffrey-Clark, Trustee Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Barker called attention to the 75~h Annual Rooftop Rodeo that begins this evening at 7:30 p.m., and runs through Sunday. Mayor Baudek commented that there are troops still serving their country in Iraq, and he urged citizens to keep them in their thoughts. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated June 24,2003. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, June 26,2003: Fire Dept.: 1. Mutual Aid Agreement with PRPA. 2. Memorandum of Understanding with RMNP - 1-yr. extension. B. Community Development, July 3,2003: Museum Dept. *1. Contract for Museum Expansion, Part I, to the Beck/Westover Team, $10,700. 4. Estes Valley Planning Commission, June 17, 2003 (acknowledgement only). 5. Firemen's Pension Board, June 30,2003 (acknowledgement only). Board of Trustees - July 8,2003 - Page 2 6. Appointment of Board of Appeals Members for the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings: Karl Ertl, Steve Lane, and Kerry Prochaska; original term expiring April, 2004, then converting to 2-yr. term. 7. Appointment of Police Chief Richardson to Larimer Center for Mental Health Board. Three-yr. term, expiring August, 2006. Mayor Baudek stated that the Museum Expansion Contract would be removed from Consent for presentation. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) that with exception of Item 3. B.1., the consent agenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. *Museum Director Kilsdonk briefed the Town Board on the Museum Expansion Contract, with the team of Beck/Westover, advising that the Contract was renegotiated and Phase I has been reduced from $10,700 to $10,500, and Phase Il has been reduced from $56,750 to $53,900, for a total of $64,400. The Committee favorably recommended approval of Phase I, with staff returning to the Community Development Committee for final approval of Phase IL It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Barker), the contract with Beck/Westover for Phase I of the Museum Expansion in the amount of $10,500 be approved, and it passed unanimously. lA. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing for all Consent Agenda Items. If the Applicant, Public or Town Board wish to speak to any of these consent items, they will be moved to the "Action Item" Section. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: 1. AMENDED PLATS. A. Amended Plat of Lot 14, Block 6, Country Club Manor Addition, with the vacated 20' of Fir Ave. adjoining subject property on the west side, and Lot 1, Block 5, Amended Plat of Blocks 4 and 5, and Lot 4, Block 3, Hyde Park Addition - Bob Griffin & Kenneth and Maryella Pearson/Applicants. 2. FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: A. Solitude 111 Condominiums, Supplemental Condominium Map #1, Lot 3, Solitude Subdivision, Unit 2, Crystal Creek Development/Applicant. B. Solitude VI Condominiums, Lot 6, Solitude Subdivision, Units 1 - 6, Fish Creek Properties, LLC/Applicant. As there was no public testimony on Items 1.A., 2.A. or 2.B, Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing, and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) Items 1.A., 2A. and 2B. be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: A. Estes Valley Development Code Block 6 Amendments. Amendments include, but are not limited to, modifying or adding provisions that address "Accessory Uses" (including Home Occupations) and Accessory Structures, Employee Housing, Housing in the "CD" Downtown Commercial Zoning District. Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing and noted the Board's intention to continue the Public Hearing to July 22,2003; however, the Board would hear any audience comments at this time. Board of Trustees - July 8,2003 - Page 3 John Spooner, 527 Hondius Cir., who was representing the recently formed Estes Park Car Club, noted the Club members in the audience, and in summary, made the following comments: appreciates the Planning Commission and Staff for recommending deletion of the 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor restriction area for garages, including attached; pleased that parking within buildings has been excluded from the Code; and the Club has not taken a position on the number of cars allowed on a lot as long as the Code provides for storage of vehicles. There being no further testimony, it was moved and seconded (Habecker/Gillette) the public hearing be continued to July 22,2003, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. TOWN BOARD GOAL 5, STANLEY PARK BUSINESS PLAN - PRESENTATION. Assistant Town Administrator Repola presented the Revitalization Plan that was favorably recommended by the Community Development Committee. The Committee also recommended authorization to initiate the master planning process. (See Community Development Minutes dated 7/3/03). Trustee Habecker commented that he was quite happy with the outcome; Team members came to meetings prepared; all had significant input; and the property needs an infusion of capital that will be funded from sales tax revenues, which in turn will benefit the entire area. Staff noted that a budget has not yet been developed pending the Master Plan (completion expected by 2/04). It was moved and seconded (Habecker/Barker) the Stanley Park Revitalization Plan be approved, and it passed unanimously. Mayor Baudek commended the Goal 5 Team for their excellent work. 2. COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND 5-YR. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) - DISCUSSION & REQUEST FOR ADOPTION. Town Administrator Widmer presented said 5-yr. Capital Improvement Plan for the Community Reinvestment Fund. The Town Board Goal to update the IGA with EPURA is the key element to the agreement as it determines how the funding flows between both agencies. Administrator Widmer emphasized that the CIP did not include widespread input, a bare minimum kind of approach was utilized, and the Plan is merely a guide that may be changed, added to, etc. The Plan is intended to be a guide for future funding decisions; highlights are listed below: > New Parks Shop Design (new building in 2005) > Bond Park Remodel, 2004 (design), 2007 and 2008 (renovation) 1 New Police Building, 2004 (design), (new building in 2006) 7 Payments for Lot 4, Stanley Historic District, refinanced Conference Center, and Performing Arts Center 1 Municipal Building Remodeling, 2003,2004 & 2007 k Museum Remodeling, Phase 11, 2004 k Annual Street Improvement Project (funded at increased levels in 2005 through 2008) k Post Office Parking Lot Reconstruction, 2005 1 Tallant Park Reconstruction, 2008 k Various Streetscape Replace, 2008 > Trail Construction, $150,000/yr. beginning in 2005 (additional funding available in the Open Space Fund) A Community Reinvestment Fund Cash Flow sheet was also reviewed that indicated the resulting fund balance based on the described CIP. This sheet shows EPURA transfer is necessary to enable construction of the basic projects the Town needs in the next five years. The assumption is that EPURA would transfer $2.5 Million/yr., to the Town ($1 Million for general operating expenses, and $1.5 Million for the Cofnmunity Reinvestment Fund projects). '. Board of Trustees - July 8,2003 - Page 4 Administrator Widmer also reviewed the EPURA Bond !ssue, Series 2003. Total Revenue Available ' , $3,250,000 Less Town Transfer -2,500,000 Remainder 750,000 Less EPURA Operating Expenses -200,000 Available for EPURA Debt Service 550,000 Bond Issue based on above Debt Service 2,500,000 EPURA fund Balance available for projects 3,000,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS $5,500,000 Town Administrator Widmer stated that the purpose of seeking adoption of the CIP at this time is to provide a framework for the EPURA bond issue and IGA that must to be adopted. The CIP has been submitted to the EPURA Commissioners and they are in consensus with the Plan. Trustee Doylen noted her concern that more Trustees were not involved in the process, suggesting the CIP be tabled pending discussion by the entire Board. Discussion followed, and it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) further action on the Capital Improvement Plan be tabled pending a study session, and it passed unanimously. The study session will be scheduled as soon as possible. 3. APPaNTMENT - FULFILLMENT TASK FORCE. As directed by Mayor Baudek, Town Administrator Widmer prepared a Fulfillment Task Force Description and Mission that will examine the issues concerning how the fulfillment portion of the Town' Advertising Program is conducted. Staff anticipates work could begin July 16~h and be concluded by September 17, 2003. The Town Board was briefed on the Purpose, Members, Schedule, Staffing, Town Board Consensus, and Other Issues. Appointment of the following members was requested: Jeff Barker, Trustee Kathy Asche Deeva Boleman Peggy Campbell Don Cheley Bruce Grant Judy Haggard Kent Meyer Al Wasson Rich Widmer, Facilitator Ted Williams Members are very respected citizens, and, with the exception of David Taylor, they have agreed to serve. Trustee Habecker noted that this issue is very important to him, and that the Town Board received their just authority by the citizens of Estes Park, recognizing the appointment of Task Force members, the Board has not relinquished their authority. Audience comments were heard from the following: Bill Almond, Gen. Mgr./Holiday Inn/Trail Ridge Store (is an EPIC contributor, supports and encourages the Task Force to look at the entire Estes Valley as the driving force of the economy); Sue Spooner/Chamber Ambassadors (encouraged/suggested a Chamber Ambassador be appointed to the Task Force to represent the Ambassadors); David Crockett/River Stone Mgmt. Co. (leads are being given away to people/resorts located out of town and they don't pay local sales tax; concerned with the composition of the Task Force-3 appointees are in accommodations businesses outside Town Limits); Ned Linegar/resident & former Chamber Mgr. (the Task Force should not only deal with fulfillment but promotion as well, and questioned the "timing" of this issue); Ken Coleman/Estes Print Works (the Chamber has done an outstanding job in promoting the city, people, area, etc.; why is the Town doing this when the Chamber is a separate entity from the Town?; questioned why leads can't go to everyone?); Mat Riley/Estes Park Campground & CRA Board Mbr. (concern with the disparity Board of Trustees - July 8,2003 - Page 5 between in and outside businesses, supports the Task Force and hopes they have good leadership-some discussion issues may be detrimental to the Chamber); Deeva Boleman, Director/CRA (distributed a list of the CRA's contributions to fulfillment, tourism promotion and economic vitality; CRA has done much more than they are contracted to do; visitors pay sales tax, business owners do not; everyone who receives leads is paying for them; has repeatedly requested a meeting with the Town Board and each request has been denied; the Town Board has made some recommendations based on partial information provided by the Town Board's representatives, not from the CRA; and concern was expressed regarding: (1) this issue has caused a division in the community, (2) a comment made during the Community Development Committee that the YMCA is an "outside competitor"; (3) whether or not recommendations from the Task Force will be taken seriously; (4) could member fees be increased to fund fulfillment services if the CRA is not in place?); and Karl Snyder/Chamber member (believes the Task Force should make a distinction between where the city starts and ends; and questioned if the internet site is the CRA's, aren't the leads theirs as well?). The following Trustee comments were heard: the controversy over the Task Force appointments is encouraging; the Task Force will work on determining whether those businesses outside Town Limits are willing to collect the same 4% sales tax and contribute to the marketing fund; inside businesses pay business license fees, outside businesses do not; confirmation that Town representatives did represent all the facts honestly to the Town Board; the Town does not want to control the Chamber; the issue remains a desire for the Town to control what the Town is paying for; the Town owns the leads; the Town Board did state they recognize the value of leads and businesses outside Town Limits and that these businesses may obtain them by paying the fair market value; and the Town Board will indeed listen to recommendations from the Task Force. Mayor Baudek added that the Trustees did not intend to imply that the Town Board is unhappy with the Chamber Ambassadors as they (Ambassadors) are doing a great job helping the community. Concluding all discussion, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the list of candidates recommended for appointment to the Fulfillment Task Force be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. STANLEY HISTORIC DISTRICT TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (TRC)- OVERLOOK PROJECT - CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR APPEAL. Town Attorney White gave an oral report on the historical backgi-ound of the Deve,opment Agreement for Lot 2, Stanley Historic District that was incorporated into the Municipal Code; the Development Plan submitted 4/14/03 by Overlook Development, Inc., the 6/04/03 approval of the Plan by the TRC, lawsuit filed Judith Nichol 6/19/03, and Motion for Stay and Temporary Restraining Order appealing the decision of the TRC. The Town Board is being requested to decide as to whether or not to consider the appeal of said TRC decision. Overlook Development, Inc. is the successor in interest to Overlook Limited Partnership, and "This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties hereto. No other party shall have any right of action or claim based upon any provision of this Agreement." The purpose of the TRC is to administratively determine whether or not any proposed development on the property meets the Design Guidelines. The appeal provision in the Master Plan is limited to the Owner/Developer of Lot 2. Thus the third party (Nichol) has no right to appeal. The TRC has denied at least two other development proposals, as they did not meet design guidelines. A memo, prepared by Town Attorney White, was included in the Town Board packet. Responding to a question concerning the "open meetings law", Attorney White stated that the TRC is a technical review group, not subject to the Open Meetings Law. Staff confirmed that Ms. Nichol's attorney was advised of this meeting, and, as there was no audience testimony, it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Habecker) the request for an appeal of a decision by the Technical Review Committee be denied, and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees - July 8,2003 - Page 6 5. ORDINANCE #8-03 - AMENDiNG MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.040.030 (CORRECT MEETING TIME FOR TOWN BOARD MEETINGS. & REPEALING CHAPTER 2.64 PLANNING COMMISSION (SECTIONS 2.64.010 AND 2.64.020 ARE CONTAINED IN THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE. Town Clerk O'Connor requested approval of the Ordinance as presented to correct inaccuracies in the Municipal Code. Attorney White read the Ordinance, and it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Newsom) Ordinance #8-03 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 6. ORDINANCE #9-03 - AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.18 BY ADDING PERFORMANCE PARK AND ADJACENT PARKING LOT TO THE RESTRICTED LIST OF PUBLIC AREAS WHERE SKATEBOARDS. ROLLERBLADES AND BICYCLES ARE PERMITTED. Police Sgt. Kufeld reviewed the current locations regulated in the Skateboarding Ordinance, and stated that pursuant to a number of complaints from area property owners and visitors, the Police Department believes that Performance Park and the adjacent parking lot should be included in the existing Skateboarding Ordinance. Skateboarding is occurring on the facility's stage area and adjoining grounds. Sgt. Kufeld confirmed that the Dept. would utilize a "soft approach" in enforcing the amended Ordinance, issuing warnings not tickets for a period of time. Town Attorney White read the Ordinance, and it was moved and seconded (Habecker/Newsom) Ordinance #9-03 be approved, including the "emergency clause", and it passed unanimously. 7. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Fall River Trail. The ped3strian bridge wes delivered and set this morning; and work continues on the Fish Creek Trail extension around the golf course. Trustee Doylen announced that 8 of the affordable units and the first market rate unit are under contract in Vista Ridge. This housing project contains 16 units in Phase 1. Trustee Doylen requested the Town Board UDdate be re-instituted to better inform all Trustees on pertinent Town issues. Trustee Habecker commended the Jaycees for a wonderful fireworks display July 40. Following completion of al agenda items, Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting at 9:07. V John Baudek, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 10, 2003. Minutes of a Regular meeting of the UTILITIES COMMITTEE of th Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in th Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 10th day of Juh 2003. Committee: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustees Gillette and Newsom Attending: Trustees Gillette and Newsom Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Public Works Director Linnan Utilities Supt. Goehring, and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent Chairman Jeffrey-Clark Trustee Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. LIGHT AND POWER DEPT. Citizen Request to Underground Electric Service at Town Expense. At the Jur meeting, staff was directed to consult with George and Dorothy Gibbs regarding th, request to underground electric service at Town expense. Staff met with the Gibbs' ar neighbor, Frank Schageman, to discuss possible options. The following determinatioi were made: 1) Mr. Schageman favored locating the line along the horse trail; however, the Gibt did not. They requested the service line be placed along the fence line locatf primarily on Mr. Schageman's property (except for approximately 20 feet). & Schageman agreed to their request. 2) The Gibbs' favored moving the transformer on the existing electric pole to tl Schageman property. Mr. Schageman did not favor the relocation and it w agreed that the transformer would remain at the current location. The estimated project cost is $6,500. Director Linnane noted that funds were n budgeted for this project; however, the Light and Power Service Extensions Account cOL accommodate the cost. Trustee Newsom voiced an objection to burying lines on private property at Top expense, stating his concern for setting a precedent and other homeowners that ha' buried lines at their own expense. Town Administrator Widmer explained Attorney White's position that an agreement m exist and approval of Town funds for this project will not set precedence resulting in change of policy. This is a unique situation involving a lengthy staff level agreement issu George Gibbs reiterated his comments from the June meeting. Concluding all discussion, a unanimous consensus was not obtained. Therefore, tl request will be presented at the July 22nd Town Board meeting for consideration. Reports ~ Monthly Financial Report. The Light and Power Financial Reports and associat graphs for June were reviewed. Â» Black & Veatch Financial Plan. A presentation of the rough draft is anticipated at tl August 14th meeting. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS , Utilities Committee - July 10, 2003 - Page 2 > Billing Department Late Payment Policy. The current late payment procedures, written in the Utilities Policy Manual, are as follows: 1) Due date - 30 days 2) 'Subject to discontinuance" - 60 days 3) Late notice sent - 77 days 4) "Final Notice" door hanger (plus $10 door hanger charge) - 87 days 5) Discontinuance of service - 88 days Staff is revising the entire late payment policy section to include finance charges a will present a recommendation at a future Committee meeting. > Charter Communications. At the June meeting, Attorney White was directed establish a Steering Committee and review the Channel 39 third-party issue, as w as review Charter's current contract and the Uplands Subdivision service issi These issues are being reviewed and the findings will be presented at a futi Committee meeting. * Misc. Projects Update. No major projects are underway. WATER DEPT. Water Dent. Change Order and Proiect Reductions. Director Linnane presentec change order request for the 2002 West Wonde,view Loop Project. The asphalt pal across MacGregor Ave. was estimated at 9 tons for the contract bid quantity. Due additional width from cracking, existing asphalt depth requirement and driveway repair, additional 62.44 tons of asphalt was required. The total change order amount to E Excavating is $7,703.80. Director Linnane also presented projects completed under their budgeted amounts: Marys Lake Raw Water Pump Station (-$52,500) and 2) the 2002 Country Club Drive/[ Horn Drive Loop Projects (-$38,650.31). The Committee acknowledged the cost savings from the Marys Lake Raw Wa Pump Station and Country Club/Big Horn Drive Loop Projects and recommen approval of the change order request from E-Z Excavating for $7,703.80. Reports ~ Monthly Financial Report - Water. The Water Financial Reports were reviewed. * Black & Veatch Water Rate Study Update. Changes to the Study are being made Black.and Veatch. Presentation, of a final draft is anticipated at the August 1 Committee meeting. , Miscellaneous Proiects Update. None. Nick Moll@/Nick Molle Productions reported that Channel 8 is currently being broadc Worldwide via the Internet. There being no further business, Trustee Gillette adjourned the meeting at 8:30 a.m. 44. foezi&*2-4 Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clâ‚¬ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 17, 2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 17~h day of July, 2003. Committee: Chairman Barker, Trustees Doylen and Habecker Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Public Works Director Linnane, Utilities Supt. Goehring, Const. Mgr. Sievers, Clerk O'Connor Absent None Chairman Barker called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. RIVERSIDE DRIVE PROJECT - REPORT. The blizzard, traffic control, and existing underground utilities exceeded estimated project costs. A discrepancy in the final fill material quantities for the roadway and utilities trenches, and associated costs is currently being negotiated between G.L. Hoff and Van Horn Engineering; therefore, the final change order request is unavailable at this time. Staff will present the change order request following resolution of the quantity issue. The Committee suggested staff be diligent with the contractor in ensuring the cost estimate s accurate. 2003 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - REQUEST APPROVAL TO AWARD OVERLAY PROJECT BID. Bids for street overlay asphalt quantities are as follows: Coulson Excavating, Loveland $196,780 Aggregate Industries, Greeley $221,430 Connell Resources, Ft. Collins $252,000 LaFarge West, Inc., Boulder $257,795 Seventeen streets, including a portion of the Hwy. 34 Trail, are incorporated in this portion of the project, and thz; remaining budgeted amount is $197,000. The Committee recommends awarding the bid to Coulson Excavating for the Street Overlay Program, including trail definition, at a cost of $196,780. The Committee applauded staff for their effort on this project and their continuing effort in maintaining/upgrading Town streets. KNOLL-WILLOWS TRAIL - REQUEST APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION OF A "TEST SECTION". Construction of the Knoll-Willows Trail is being designed to protect the land and vegetation in a manner consistent with that employed by the RMNP for their trail construction. As this is a new type of trail construction for the Town, staff is proposing to construct a test section of trail in order that accurate cost estimates and construction procedures can be determined. The test section will remain after construction is complete and the cost will be $10,000. Mike Todd/Cornerstone Engineering confirmed that his staff would remain on site fulltime until they are fully confident on all aspects of the project. The plan includes a 4' crushed gravel path with no side disturbance, the majority of construction will be handwork, and a test section will be constructed at the bottom and top of the proposed RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' Public Works Committee - July 17, 2003 - Page 2 path. The goal is to return the site to its natural setting, and funding is from the Larimer County Open Space Fund ($149,000 was budgeted for Ph. I, and the Land Trust is paying for the first $50,000). The Committee recommends approval of a test section for the Knoll-Willows Trail at a cost of $10,000 as outlined above. FISH CREEK TRAIL CHANGE ORDER #2- REQUEST APPROVAL. Director Linnane reported that the Cornerstone Engineering design of the two Fish Creek crossings on the Fish Creek Trail resulted in an increase to the 100-year floodway. Army Corps and Flood Plain permits were obtained by Cornerstone Engineering and FEMA has since been contacted. Staff directed Cornerstone to reduce the proposed water level in accordance with the regulated standards, thus two 36" x 58" diameter culverts will be installed at each crossings. The construction cost from G. L. Hoff for the culverts is $9,400. Staff requested Cornerstone share in the cost of adding a culvert at each location. Cornerstone has offered to pay for the $1,100 duplication of costs resulting from removal of material already placed. Cornerstone also offered to pay for the hydraulic modeling analyses and FEMA coordination. As indicated below, the remaining budget for this project is $40,781. The net cost for Change Order #2 (after the Cornerstone adjustment) is $9,400. Original construction budget: $312,800 Original contract: (-256,369) Church easement: (-9,100) Change Order #1, June 2003: (-6,550) Remaining budget: $40,781 The Committee suggested staff be diligent with the contractor in ensuring the cost estimate is accurate. The Committee recommends approval of Change Order #2 from Cornerstone Engineering for $9,400, as presented. Completion is expected by the end of August. REPORTS. Highway Sighalization Project: CDOT has completed the signalization computer model and report, and has implemented the recommended results. The intent is to optimize the Town's four key traffic signals: Hwy.7/Hwy. 36, Hwy. 34/Hwy. 36, Elkhorn Ave./Riverside Dr., and Elkhorn Ave./Moraine Ave. CDOT has supplied the Town with a printout of the summer schedule that will now enable staff to accurately respond to local questions. Pursuant to complaints, Staff intends to contact CDOT for discussion on the (1) Moraine Ave./Big Horn Dr. Intersection, and (2) the length of the green signal on Hwy. 34. Chairman Barker noted he has received complaints on the chirpers; Director Linnane confirmed that the sound has been lowered, however, the ambient noise of the highway will cause the chirper sound to increase. Pedestrian Flag Pilot Project. This project has resulted in a safer crossing of Elkhorn Ave., as well as a loss of flags. A cheaper source of $2.50/flag has been located. For the record, Chairman Barker stated he is in favor of discontinuing this pilot project. Gateway Sign. Parks Supt. Speedlin and Trustee Doylen have received verbal approval to construct water and electric service lines across the 10- private strip of land for this project; negotiations continue for ownership of said 10' strip. The site has been staked and construction is anticipated to begin the week of July 21 St. Current Pedestrian Trail Construction Projects. Fall River Trail, Phase Il - The project, including the pedestrian bridge, is substantially complete. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - July 17, 2003 - Page 3 Fish Creek Trail, Phase 1 - Completion is scheduled the end of August; the creek crossings have been an issue, however, it will be resolved. Knoll-Willows Trail - A test section is scheduled for construction this month. Design is requiring the project to be bid in August or September. CDOT ISTEA Grant for Fall River Trail, Phase 11, and Fish Trail, Phase 11 - CDOT has awarded the Town $341,000 of Enhancement Fund Grants for these two projects that have been budgeted for 2004. The Committee expressed their appreciation to Public Works Dir. Linnane, his staff, and Cornerstone Engineering for their continued success in applying for and obtaining project grants. There being no further business, Chairman Barker adjourned the meeting at 8:48 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk TOWN of ESTES PARK Inter-Office Memorandum July 15, 2003 TO: Town Board FROM: Bill Linnane -(LHU SUBJECT: Request by Owners of Lot 12 & 13, Stanley Heights Subdivision to Underground Private Service Line at the Town's Expense Background: Refer to the attached vicinity map for reference. Dating back to the year 2000, George and Dorothy Gibbs have been requesting the Town pay to underground an electric service line across their property which was installed in 1965 to service two adjacent neighbors. Staff has been reluctant to fund the project due to Town policy, which is private underground projects are not funded by the Town. (Background - Continued on Page 2) Cosl/Budget Budget -0- Cost $5,000 Construction cost (per January 2003 T.A. Enterprises bid) $1,500 Material cost $6,500 Total Note: The Light and Power Service Extensions Account can accommodate the cost Action: At the July 2003 Utilities Committee meeting, staff explained that it could proceed with construction of the service line along the route preferred by Mr. and Mrs. Gibbs if the committee chose to do so based upon the agreement issue described above. The committee voted whether or not to construct it along the Gibbs proposed route and the vote was a split Therefore the item is submitted to this Town Board meeting without a recommendation. (Background - Continued from Page 1) After approximately two years of meetings with the Gibbs, owners of Lots 12 & 13 in Stanley Heights, last year a previous staff member agreed to underground the service at Town expense in exchange for an easement from the Gibbs. Agreements such as this are usually reviewed and approved at the Town Board level not staff level, since Town policy is not to fund private service line underground projects. It is Town Attorney White's opinion that an agreement may exist and approval of Town funds for the Gibbs' project will not set precedence resulting in a change of policy. This is a unique situation involving a long and drawn out staff level agreement issue. The project was discussed at the following meetings: 1) January 2003 Light and Power Committee: Staff recommended to fund the project and the committee voted against funding the project since it was not in accordance with Town policy. 2) June 2003 Utililies Committee: The committee decided to reconsider since an easement was granted as mentioned above and as a result an agreement may exist Staff recommended that if the line were to be underground, it should follow the adjacent horse trail. This route is already disturbed, is shorter by 50 feet and parallels the route preferred by the Gibbs. Staff was directed to meet with the Gibbs and decide upon a route. 3) July 2003 Utilities Committee: The horse trail location is not acceptable to the Gibbs. The original easement route along the fence line and outside of the Gibbs property (except 20 feet +/-) would be the location of the line if constructed. The commitbee was split on whether or not to fund the project BL/lb Attachment 1.1-1 Z 3[vttl 1913 AN 4- 11 K: te s 5 4/ d 0 -r 21?9 0 47 W 13 0 Â° le 14 -1 3 8 4 3.11] f 10 3 0 PC g (> 0 6 4_ 1 09 Z 91 2- ~t i : ~ - Cy W - 0 &'. 4/ I .. .7 FENCE ~ -X â€¢ '7. llÂ¥81 3SEIOH \ e :. 1 2 -7, 3 %9.....6....... iq < ti LU 1 /\ R 1-9 UNDERGROUND NOI1Â¥0013hl 31IS Prwflw~ i. GIBBS .... E EASEMENT NV~139VHO Police Department Memo TO: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and the Town Board of Trustees From: Police Chief Lowell Richardson Date: 07/18/03 Re: Municipal Court/Drivers License Suspension-Possession and Use of a Controlled Substance Background: In early 2003, Public Safety Chairman Stephen Gillette requested a research of Colorado laws regarding minors in possession of alcohol and minors in possession of a controlled substance as it relates to the suspension of a drivers license whenever a child is cited and convicted. Town Attorney Greg White researched the Colorado Revised Statutes and found that there were no current Colorado laws relating to minors in possession of a controlled substance or who have used a controlled substance as is the case for minors in possession of alcohol. This information was provided to the Public Safety Committee in June of 2003. The Committee requested this issue be presented to the Town Board of Trustees. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff recommends that a letter be drafted and presented to the Colorado Municipal League Legislative Lobbyist by the Town of Estes Park representative for the C.M.L., Trustee Barker. This letter should contain the following: Request that any minor found in possession of or who has consumed a controlled substance that their license be subjected to the same parameters of sentencing that currently exist for those minors who have been convicted of consuming or possessing ethyl alcohol. 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 26,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 26th day of June, 2003. Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Jeffrey-Clark and Newsom Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Police Chief Richardson, Fire Chief Dorman, Police Commander van Deutekom, Support Services Manager Bartram, Sgt. Rose, Clerk O'Connor Absent None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT. Reports: Legal Opinion - Municipal Court/Drivers License Suspension-Possession and Use of a Controlled Substance. The Committee reviewed a letter dated June 10, 2003 submitted by Town Attorney White responding to the Committee's request (4/23/03) on the Court's ability to go beyond the state statute and mandate identical treatment for underage consumption and/or possession of a controlled substance with regard to drivers license revocation. In summary, based on 42-2-125(I)(m), CRS and 42-2-125(I)(b) CRS, the Town does not have the grant of statutory authority to require the revocation of a drivers license for anything other than those offenses set forth in Section 9.20.010 of the Municipal Code. A change in the state statutes would be necessary for the Town to have the authority to pass an ordinance. Chief Richardson recommended that any discussion with state legislators include the following language: "possession or be under the influence of'-this language is identical to underage drinking language. Town Administrator Widmer stated that Trustee Barker serves on the CML Policy Committee where issues to be presented to the State Legislature are determined. Following discussion, the Committee recommended " Drivers License Suspension for Possession and Use of a Controlled Substance" be presented during a Town Board meeting to determine support. Police Department Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and the Town Board of Trustees From: Police Chief Lowell Richardson Date: 07/18/03 Re: Model Traffic Code Revision Background: The Colorado Model Traffic Code has been revised and reviewed for 2003. The last revision made to the Model Traffic Code was in 1995. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: Staff recommends approval of the revisions made and adoption of the Model Traffic Code, Appendix and Ordinance. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 10-03 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING-BY REFERENCE, THE MODEL TRAFFIC CODE FOR COLORADO, REVISED 2003 WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to adopt the Model Traffic Code for Colorado, Revised 2003, including the Appendix. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 10.04.010 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.04.010. Model Traffic Code Adopted. The Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities, Revised 2003, hereinafter referred to as the Model Traffic Code, is enacted and adopted herein by reference as a primary code. 10.04.030. Additions and modifications. This section is deleted in its entirety. Section 2. The adoption of this Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, on the day of ,2003. Town Clerk MODEL TRAFFIC CODE TOWN OF ESTES PARK - APPENDIX Amended July 22,2003 As Posted and Verified by the Police Department 06/24/03 PARKING: Hours of Timed Parking - 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. There are 788 timed parking spaces (639 spaces in lots, and 149 on-street spaces). ON-STREET PARKING, 3-HR. LIMIT: East Elkhorn (Bond Park) East Riverside (Subway Restaurant) Ed's Cantina Moraine Ave. Park Lane, M N. side Subway West Elkhorn Ave. Wiest Drive PARKING LOTS, 3-HOUR LIMIT: Coffee Bar Lot, NW corner of E. Elkhorn & Park Ln. Dark Horse Lot Post Office Lot, north end PARKING LOTS, 30-MINUTE LIMIT: Post Office Lot, south end ON-STREET, 30-MINUTE PARKING: MacGregor Ave., east side in front of Municipal Building Timed parking will be in force from the weekend prior to Memorial Day and be in effect until Labor Day. Signs will state parking limits enforced May-September. NO-PARKING: NO-PARKING, LOADING ZONE - YEAR'ROUND East Elkhorn Ave., 100 Block, both sides East Elkhorn Ave., 200 Block, in front of Barlow Plaza and Starbucks 1 NO-PARKING, Continued: MacGregor Ave./Bypass Intersection (northeast corner, adjacent to Canyon Creek Condominiums NO PARKING DURING SNOW REMOVAL OPERATIONS Aspen, Birch, Columbine, Driftwood, and Elm Avenues, both sides PARKING LIMITATIONS: Big Horn Dr. No Parking E. side of Cleave St. . Both sides 200 Block: W. side, and E. side = 1/2 Cleave St. No Parking S. side of Lawn Ln. to 100' E. of Lawn Ln. N. side, in front of 223 Cleave St. S. side at Big Horn Dr. No Parking/ S. side, behind Old Church Loading Zone Shops Davis St. No Parking N. side at Moraine Ave. E. Riverside Dr. No Overnight Parking W. side (vacant strip), 300 Block Lawn Ln. No Parking W. side, between Spruce Dr. & Cleave St. MacGregor Ave. Angle Parking 100 Blk., both sides . Moraine Ave. No Parking E. side between Molly B's Rest. & Elkhorn Ave. W. side to Wiest Dr. S. side near Elm Rd. E. side, 100 Blk. of Moraine Ave. Park Lane Angle Parking Both sides Spruce Dr. No Parking E. side, between Cleave St. & Lawn Ln. 2 PARKING LIMITATIONS, Continued: Tregent Park No Camping/ Overnight Parking Elkhorn 05 ) & Spruce Avenues W. Elkhorn Ave. No Parking/ Loading Zone N. side at Tregent Park No Parking S. side, opposite Tregent Park No Parking/ Loading Zone N. side between 109-117 W. Elkhorn Ave. N. side between 191-211 W. Elkhorn Ave. S. side at 230 W. Elkhorn Ave. S. side between 134-145 W. Elkhorn Ave. Wiest Dr. No Parking N. side at Moraine Ave. Post Office Parking Lot 30-Min. Parking S. side (half) of lot, middle 9:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m., Parking spaces; 6 signs on except Sundays 3 light poles Wiest Parking Lot No Camping/ Overnight Parking S. side Highway 7 Parallel Parking E. side, 100 Blk. of Hwy. 7 3 SPEED LIMITS: Aspen Ave. Both Directions 25 MPH Birch Ave. Both Directions 25 MPH Big Horn Dr. South bound, 100' S. of Wonderview 20 MPH, SB Ave. to W. Elkhorn Ave. Big Thompson Ave. (Hwy. 34) Hwy. 34, E. of Hwy. 34/36 35 MPH, EB Inter. to .7 miles E. of Hwy. 34/36 Inter. Hwy. 34,.7 miles E. of Hwy. 34/36 40 MPH, EB Inter. to City Limits 1.4 miles from City Limits to 35 MPH, WB Hwy. 34/36 Brodie Ave. From Fish Creek, WB/EB to 20 MPH, SZ Community Dr. School Zone: 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 20 MPH, otherwise 25 MPH Carriage Dr. From Hwy. 7, EB to Lakeshore Dr. 25 MPH Cleave St. Both Directions 20 MPH Columbine Ave. Both Directions 25 MPH Community Dr. Hwy. 36/Community Dr., S. to Manford Ave. 30 MPH, SB/NB Hwy. 7/Community Dr., N. to Manford Ave. @ Brodie Ave. Inter. 20 MPH, SZ Driftwood Ave. Both sides 25 MPH 4 SPEED LIMITS, Continued #2: E. Elkhorn Ave. Hwy. 34/36 Inter. to Park Ln. 25 MPH Hwy. 34/36 Inter. to Park Ln. @ E. Elkhorn Ave. 25 MPH, WB E. Riverside Dr. W. from E. Elkhorn Ave. to Moccasin Bypass 20 MPH, WB/EB Elm Ave. Both Directions 25 MPH Fish Hatchery Rd. At Fall River Rd. 30 MPH, WB Grand Estates Dr. Both directions 30 MPH Graves Ave. From Hwy. 7 WB/EB to Community 20 MPH, SZ, EB/WB Heinz Parkway High Dr. N. to City Limits 20 MPH, NB High Drive Heinz Parkway W. to City Limits 30 MPH, WB Highway 7 Hwy. 36 S. to Stanley Ave. 35 MPH, SB N. from Stanley Ave. 35 MPH, NB Hwy. 36/7 Inter. S. to Lexington Ln. 35 MPH, SB S. to City Limits & Peakview 45 MPH, SB Community Dr. N. to Hwy. 36/7 Inter. 35 MPH, NB @ Dunraven 35 MPH, SB @ 4â„¢ St. 25 MPH, SB @ High St. 35 MPH, NB @ Graves Ave. 35 MPH, SB @ Morgan St. 25 MPH, SZ, NB @ Country Club Dr. 35 MPH, NB @ Twin St. 50 MPH, SB @ Scott Ave. 50 MPH, NB @ Carriage Dr. 50 MPH, SB @ Carriage D., just south of 50 MPH, NB Highway 34 Hwy. 34/36 Inter. E. to .1 mile from Steamer Dr. 35 MPH, EB From Steamer Dr. E. to City Limits 35 MPH, EB From City Limits W. to W. Grand Estates Dr. 40 MPH, WB W. Grand Estates Dr. W. to 34/36 Inter. 35 MPH, WB 5 . 4 t, SPEED LIMITS, Continued #3: Highway 34 @ Dry Gulch Rd. 40 MPH, WB (cont'd.) @ Lakefront St. 40 MPH, EB Highway 36 Hwy. 34/36 Inter. E. to Hwy. 7/36 Inter. 35 MPH, EB W. from Hwy. 7 to .3 miles on Hwy. 36 35 MPH, WB .3 miles Hwy. 36 to Hwy. 34/36 Inter. 25 MPH, WB 2nd St., E. to 4th St. , 45 MPH, EB 4m St. to City Limits 50 MPH, EB/WB 4* St. W. to 2nd St. 45 MPH, WB 2nd St. W. to Hwy. 36/7 Inter. 35 MPH, WB @ Fish Creek Rd. 50 MPH, WB @ Manford Ave. 50 MPH, WB @ Hwy. 36/7 Inter., just W. of 35 MPH, WB Larkspur Dr. From Carriage Dr. SB/NB to City Limits 25 MPH MacGregor Ave. 25' N. of Wonderview Ave. to MacGregor Ranch 30 MPH, NB/SB Mary's Lake Rd. 200' S. of Moraine Ave. to City Limits 30 MPH, SB Manford Ave. From EPHS WB/EB to Hwy. 7 20 MPH, SZ Moccasin Bypass S. from Riverside Dr. to Prospect Ave. 25 MPH, SB/NB (Except .3 miles E. of Riverside Dr.) 20 MPH Moraine Ave. .1 mile E. of Mary's Lake Rd. to (Hwy. 36) .1 mile W. of Davis St. 35 MPH, EB .1 mile W. of Davis St. to Elkhorn Ave. 25 MPH, EB 200' N. of Davis St. to .2 miles W. of Davis St. 25 MPH, WB .2 miles W. of Davis St. to City Limits 35 MPH, WB From Crags Dr. to Moraine/Elkhorn 25 MPH, NB/SB Peak View Dr. From Hwy. 7 EB/WB to City Limits 35 MPH Ponderosa Dr. From Stanley Ave. SB/NB to Morgan Ln. 25 MPH, SB Prospect Ave. Stanley Ave. to Moccasin Cir. Dr. 25 MPH, EBANB W. from Stanley Ave. to Fir Ave. 25 MPH, EBANB 6 SPEED LIMITS, Continued #4: Riverside Dr. From W. City Limits to 100' W. of Prospect Village Dr. 30 MPH, WB/EB Rockwell St. From Moraine Ave. to E. Riverside Dr. 25 MPH, EB Scott Ave. From Hwy. 7 EB/WB to Fish Creek Rd. 25 MPH Stanley Ave. W. from Hwy. 7 to Hwy. 36 30 MPH, WB From Hwy. 7 NB/SB to Prospect Ave. 30 MPH Stanley Cir. Circles Stanley Ave. 30 MPH, WB/EB Steamer Dr. .05 miles from Hwy. 34 to City Limits 20 MPH, NB/SB Twin Dr. From Hwy. 7 EBANB to Peak View Dr. 30 MPH Virginia Dr. . W. from Park Ln. to Big Horn Dr. 20 MPH, EB, M W. Elkhorn Ave. Big Horn Dr. to .2 miles W. of Spruce Dr. 20 MPH, WB .2 miles W. of Spruce Dr. to .1 miles W. of Old Ranger Rd. 35 MPH, WB .1 miles W. of Old Ranger Rd. to City Limits 40 MPH, WB 1,000 Yds. E. of Valley Rd. to 100 Yds. W. of Spruce Dr. 35 MPHâ€ž EB Far View Dr. to 100' W. of Wiest Dr. 35 MPH, EB W. Riverside Dr. W. to Crags Dr. from Ivy St. 20 MPH, WB/EB Wonderview Ave. .1 miles E. of MacGregor Ave. to (Bypass) City Limits 40 MPH, EB/WB 1.25 miles E. of W. Elkhorn Ave. to Hwy. 34/36 Inter. 35 MPH, EB 7 j O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 r-ILrIOO ... E N Ort N Ill O\0 0\0 0'Â¥0 0\0 O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 OID,-191 ,-1 =11 Ul =11 01 U 09 0101 7 0 m 00 W Ul LA lili H r-1 lili U 1 OW O\0 0\0 0Â» 0\0 O\0 0\0 09 0\0 h LO Ch N g b rn 01 1.n 9 . . . . 10(-44400,9 . LD LA Ch 94 *Mr-1 1 0,-1 111 1 1 0\0 O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 910[-1-r)Gh # 5 rio Ch OChlor-Il.D O =t O 0 1-1 1 (901 1 1 ,-1 09 09 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 010 010 0/0 a O to oto# 01 O LD LD .... rl>mmel ,-1.mr--1 1 1 01 r-1 0\0 0\lowe\0 0\0 32 - .\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 00020: il 00 CON O o m m 41 O''''I il11 E-4 0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0,0 0\0 I. 2 0\0 09 0\0 r--1 [Â·\ LA h Ul 9Â¥ Oorit-mul < emmoo 2..... Â£ O gill 0 -4--- p ./.IPON, op . a .9 - -m O w 5 m 0 00 Â· O,. u 01 0 * 00 U 00 1-1 a h O M 00 t.0 0 01 .-1 0 1 * mt - O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 2 .NO .No okâ€¢ O\P c~ LO LO LD 00 0, E-1 1-0 ,-1 N .-1 ul ...... b Ul M O .-1 M V .-1 .-1 ,.1 O 111 111 0\0 0\Â° O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 O\Â° O\0 0Â¥~ O\Â° OW 9,-lin91'Ult.fl Y (NI O Ch LO I SE?TET h N Ch 00 01 r--1 1111 amas=# H R â€¢:' B DIE-1 , U . A. E-1 > U aammume b :4 UOM P P 01 U O M 94000Â¤ KNOZA ~ssang XYN SS'IVS -%6.I- -liI. D- 1 8- Ps E'E- 41 I- VISITS US 34 US 36 T RETAIL ACCOM REST GROC -13.1% SALES TAX WOODY 7 IVZLEIN 'IMMOX Sn SLISIA ECONOMIC INDICATORS 2003 - 2002 NTHLY % ' *I'8- 1 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 .\0 0/0 0Â¥0 0/0 OW /\0 0\0 ck' O'p o\O CAO o\O LOH.Nelr-IN5(9~000 Inc'~00#9tl.Woo.C'10=11 00,-ImN(Nr-Id=t'LE>Omt- 000'V.#Mr-191'00â€¢-Ir-1 11 .1.0 111 el 1-1 lili O\Â° O\Â° OÂ¥' O\Â° o'VD ow 0\0 0/0 /\O 0\0 00 0/0 & ow ow 0\0 0'p o\O 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0 0 A 0, 01 03 00 M oo 0 00 * O 1.0 00 0 00 (,1 0, ul Ir) r-1 h ...................... Nr-Ir-101-1500591'r-IOLO U (N (*Im[~Oulor-Ir-ILDLI, 9111(Nolr-11-1 .-1 1 ILn Eli 41 01.-11.-11,1111 1 1 lili 0\0 0/0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0. 0\0 0\0 0\0 O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0\0 0\0 r-11-OV{NNEI'WUONOOâ€¢-1 1-1000001.r)*lit.nur-IN) ............ ,-191'FLOr-Imr-100,tntrIO 1-1(NwOOADOOM(Nr-Ir-1 MI r-1 1-1 r-1 r-1 1-1 r-1 0'rlili 1 11 cka .W oW o\P o. 0\, 01 0\0 01 0\0 0\0 0\0 O/0 0\0 0Â¥0 0\0 dvÂ° O\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0/0 0\0 0\0 1.0911#00(NOWâ€¢-151-10100 1.0 to N 1,0 CO h 01 0 0 LD (N Al 4'mt.r)91(0010'1(Â¥1*Chrel.-1 4400mmu00011-1(NMAN 1-1 Im!-tilt-'Ir-11-1 r-lili 1 1 0\0 dp dP * de de dp & dp & AD o. O/ 0\0 cho O\0 0\DOW O\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 12-Omt-NMOOLOCDON ..:1 9 1 m Â° 00 (N el r- 00 m 44 0 00.Ul.{Nr-IMMWOO# 4 00%GAr-~r-Jar-(N(N r-1 r-1 1 1 1-1 r-1 1 1-1 M?.4 lilli lili 2 11 11 Ul 04 z 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0100 0\0 01 0\0 0,0 01,0 0\0 OW r48mONflot.ntr,4,00Â£0Lnt.r, LO[Â¥1000030\LONOO @Coijt<c<u;c<Lor,;ult- . e 0,0 0\0 0\0 ./low .\0 0\0 0\0 00 N O T /1 |Talitii,///I'l 01 1 .4 1 ,-1 (Nmr-1 1-1 01 N N r-1 r-1 1-1 ,-1 r-1 1-1,-1 r-1 OÂ· 8 N m # 0 01 5 N G O N 44 N 9 0 . R . 0\0 0\0 0,0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 O/0 0\0 0/0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0/0 QW9199999<999 QI#AmeÂ°A E-1 9 e. M o m 00 .0 M â€¢-1 m tri E-1000 Om.â€¢01.-1.. O ' ' I1k 11 01 11 Z Z Z Z m E-1 m El 6 ./0 op olo ow ./ ./../0 ow ~~0 0\0 0\0 p 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 8 5ooNooon#m= .-Im# O.-t-Mloloocolorn ....... .4 ... U U, . . . 41.-191'01000141 m N LD m.,mmr444444.444 0 111 1 (N rl ..1 1*11 ON|'|| 'zzzz H = $0 ./0 &. c. 0Â¥~ c,0 IP & c,0 00 0/0 'P OW O\0 0'p o\O oÂ¥, O,0 0\0 0\0 01,0 0\0 0\0 0\0 E-1 M m N Q In 00 0 914 In 1-1 41 CO 64 M b Lrl 00 m O In W 1-1 00 m .11 ........... 91' h O 91 10 10 1-1 r-1 w O 911 (-9 914Lf-,mmrill-nmemol{Nol 11 11 o\Â° O\0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0/0 0\0 0\0 0/0 0,0 0/ 0\0 0\0 0\0 0,00 01Â¥, 0\0 0\0 0\0 0\0 op OW 0\0 0041.-1 N f O m Nu o e 00#(NMODuLANLOr-lb=11 . . . . . . . A . . . . . . . . . . . . r-1003,-1 Nt.0445,-Ilot' :-1 1 0 Mul r-1 LI) Ul 1.0 L_fl LE} In = â€¢-1 * t ,-4 It ) , I 1IItII aeam2eemagaM Heammeemagm" VISITS US 34 US 36 TOTAL GIFTS ACCOM REST GROC Jolie WOODY SQEIS ImVIS UY n DE Sn SIISIA 5-DE- SALES TAX xvi sa'nfs ECONOMIC INDICATORS MONTHLY % % Chg 2002 - 2001 19.9% Prepared 08/07/03 ~ 2*7- The Mission of the Town of Estes Fark le to plan and provide reliable, hi0h-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We tai<8 0reat pride eneurinG and enhancin0 the quality of life in our community by beine 0ood etewarde of public reeources and natural eettind. llc-' ' Naks-KEy BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER WEEK - Salud Family Health Center Representatives. PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval ofi: 1. Town Board Minutes dated July 22, 2003, Town Board Study Session Minutes dated July 23,2003. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, July 24,2003: Police Department: 1. Faith Based and Community Partnership - Approval for Police Department to provide services. 2. *Amendments to the Municipal Code - See "Action Items 1-4" below: 1 Chapter 9.28.030 Drug Paraphernalia > Chapter 9.18.010 Skateboard Definition * Chapter 9.08.070 Concealed Weapons Permits k Chapter 7.12.080 Kennel Restrictions 3. Resolution #8-03 Approving the $.45/phone monthly access facility charge (9-1-1-) for telephone exchange & wireless communication. Fire Department 1. Donation of 14' Zodiac Dive Boat, Motor & Trailer to Thompson Valley Ambulance Service. 2. Donation of 1980 Ford LN 7000 Haz Mat Truck to the American Red Cross. B. Community Development, August 7,2003: Senior Center: 1. Revised User Agreement - Approval. 4. Estes Park Housing Authority, July 23,2003 (acknowledgment only). 5. Estes Valley Planning Commission, July 15, 2003 (acknowledgement only). 1 lA. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing for all Consent Agenda Items. If the Applicant, Public or Town Board wish to speak to any of these consent items, they will be moved to the "Action Item" Section. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: 1. PRELIMINARY/FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS. A. Vista Ridge Preliminary & Final Condominium Map, Lot 1, Vista Ridge Subdivision, Estes Investors LLC/Applicant. B. Park River West Condominiums, Supplemental Condominium Map (Final), Phase X, Lots 1 and 2, Park River West Subdivision, Richard H. Wille/Applicant. C. Mary's Lake Lodge, Supplemental Condominium Map #2 (Final), Lot 3, Mary's Lake Subdivision, Frank Theis/Applicant. 2. ACTION ITEMS: Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing (A). The formal public hearing will be conducted as follows: â€¢ Mayor - Open Public Hearing â€¢ Staff Report â€¢ Town Attorney White read the Ordinance â€¢ Public Testimony â€¢ Mayor - Close Public Hearing â€¢ Motion to Approve/Deny. A. Ordinance #15-03 - Estes Valley Development Code Block 6 Amendments. Amendments include, but are not limited to, modifying or adding provisions that address "Accessory Uses" (including Home Occupations) and Accessory Structures, Employee Housing, Housing in the "CD" Downtown Commercial Zoning District. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. *ORDINANCE #11-03 AMENDING CHAPTER 9.28.030 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA - SALE UNLAWFUL (Amending existing language to follow State Statute). Police Commander Filsinger. 2. *ORDINANCE #12-03 AMENDiNG CHAPTER 9.18.010 SKATEBOARD DEFINITION (Amending the Skateboard Definition bv adding "motorized"). Police Commander Filsinger. 3. *ORDINANCE #13-03 AMENDING CHAPTER 9.08.070 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS (Repealinq this section in its entirety pursuant to Senate Bill 24). Police Chief Richardson. 4. *ORDINANCE #14-03 AMENDING CHAPTER 7.12.080 KENNEL RESTRICTIONS (Correcting a reference, and increasing the number of adult dogs allowed from 2 to 3). Police Commander Filsinger. 5. ESTES PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY - UPDATE. Rita Kurelja, Estes Park Manager. . 2 Prepared 08/07/03 I I 6. TOWN MARKETING/FULFILLMENT - DISCUSSION. Trustee Habecker. 7. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. 8. ADJOURN. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 3 A ' Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 22,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 22nd day of July, 2003. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W. Gillette David Habecker Lori Jeffrey-Clark G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: None Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS None. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated July 8,2003. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Utilities, July 10, 2003: 1. *Homeowner Request to Underground Electric Service at Town Expense - See Action Item #1 below. 2. 2002 West Wonderview Loop Project: E-Z Excavating Change Order, $7,703.80. B. Public Works, July 17, 2003: 1. 2003 Street Overlay Project Award to Coulson Excavating, $196,780. 2. Knoll-Willows Trail - Construction of "Test Section", $10,000. 3. Fish Creek Trail Project: G. L. Hoff Change Order, $9,400. 4. Estes Valley Development Code, Block 6 Amendments - CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUGUST 12, 2003. Board of Trustees - July 22,2003 - Page 2 It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the consent agenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 4. *HOMEOWNER REQUEST TO UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE AT TOWN EXPENSE, REFERRED TO TOWN BOARD BY UTILITIES COMMITTEE 7/10/03. The Utilities Committee referred this item to the Town Board. Public Works Dir. Linnane briefed the Trustees on the request made by George and Dorothy Gibbs for the Town to underground the existing electric service line across their property (Lots 12 and 13, Stanley Heights Sub.) at Town expense. Town policy does not allow funding private service line underground projects. At issue, is whether the Town is obligated to underground the service by alleged statements made by Town field personnel, acting outside existing Town policy. The Gibbs did grant an easement; and if the request is approved by the Trustees, Dir. Linnane believes the installation should follow the adjacent horse trail as the route is already disturbed, and shorter by 50 ft. This location is unacceptable to the homeowners-the original easement route was along the fence line and outside of the Gibbs' property; however, it is acceptable to the adjacent property owner (Schageman). Staff confirmed that funds were not budgeted and estimated costs are $6,500. Following a question and answer period by the Board (how many trees would be disturbed at the Gibbs preferred site?; confirmation an inappropriate decision was made by field personnel; if the request was approved, the Town Board would be in violation of existing policy; if granted, the Light and Power Dept. and its customers would financially be contributing toward this request; and legal theory concerning the Town's representation by field personnel), George and Dorothy Gibbs presented their position, and, in summary, believe the Town should act in good conscience and grant their request. Requesting a conference with the Town Attorney, it was moved and seconded (Barker/Jeffrey-Clark) the Town Board enter Executive Session pursuant to C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b) for the purpose of receiving legal advice on a specific legal question. The motion passed unanimously, thus Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting to Executive session at 7:36 p.m. Mayor Baudek reconvened the meeting to Open Session at 7:42 p.m. Finding that approval of the request does not meet existing Town policy, Trustee Newsom moved the request to underground electric service at Town expense be denied. Trustees Gillette and Jeffrey-Clark stated that, in their opinion, expectations were made, and they support.the homeowner's request. Stating that approval of the request could set a precedent, Trustee Habecker seconded the motion, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Barker, Doylen, Habecker and Newsom. Those voting "No" Trustees Gillette and Jeffrey-Clark. Trustee Habecker commented that established policy would allow the Town to arrange a financing method for the Gibbs should they opt to underground their private electric line. 5. DRIVERS LICENSE SUSPENSION FOR POSSESSION AND USE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - REQUEST TOWN BOARD SUPPORT FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE CML POLICY COMMITTEE. Police Chief Richardson explained that State law mandating the suspension of a drivers license addresses possession of alcohol; it does not include possession of a controlled substance. Following a legal opinion from Town Attorney White, the Public Safety Committee referred this item to the Town Board to .. Board of Trustees - July 22,2003 - Page 3 determine support to proceed with a letter to the Colorado Municipal League Legislative Lobbyist to improve consistency in the law by adding language to include possession and use of a controlled substance. The Town's official request should contain the following: Request that a minor's drivers license be subjected to the identical parameters of sentencing that currently exist for those minors who have been convicted of consuming or possessing ethyl alcohol. Trustee Gillette commented that current law sends the wrong message and laws should be consistent. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) Trustee Barker be authorized to draft a letter of support for presentation to the CML Policy Committee, and the motion passed unanimously. Letters to State Officials are also appropriate. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE #10-03 ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, THE MODEL TRAFFIC CODE FOR COLORADO. REVISED 2003. Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing, and Police Chief Richardson reviewed the Code that was recently revised by the State of Colorado. The current Code was last revised in 1995. Specific regulations pertaining to parking, no parking, parking limitations, are speed limits are contained in the Appendix dated June 24,2003. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #10-03, and as there was no public testimony, Mayor Baudek closed the Public Hearing. Following a question and answer period, Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Habecker) Ordinance #10- 03 adopting, by reference, the 2003 Model Traffic Code for Colorado be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Sales Tax Report. May statistics were reviewed, and economic indicators show a continued downward trend, with budget year-to-date sales tax revenues down -1.9%. Proposed budget cuts will be submitted for consideration in August. B. Ban on Open Burning Declared. Effective 7/21 at noon - Larimer County and the Town placed a ban on open burning. The legal notice will be published as required. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting at 8:46 P.m. John Baudek, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 23,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the TOWN BOARD STUDY SESSION of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 23rd day of July, 2003. Board: Mayor Baudek, Trustees Barker, Doylen, Gillette, Habecker, Jeffrey-Clark, Newsom Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Clerk O'Connor, Directors Brandjord and Linnane Absent None Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND - 5-YR. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Town Administrator Widmer referred to the EPURA Bond Issue, Series 2003 and reviewed how, through several iterations with bond counsel and financial advisors, staff derived at the following: Total Revenue Available $3,250,000 Less Town Transfer -2,500,000 Remainder 750,000 Less EPURA Operating Expenses -200,000 Available for EPURA Debt Service 550,000 Bond Issue based on above Debt Service 2,500,000 EPUFU\ fund Balance available for projects 3,000,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS $5,500,000 The Community Reinvestment Fund Cash Flow Sheet was also reviewed. Taking into consideration the conservative 1 % growth increment utilized in bond issue projections, staff believes sufficient funding would be provided to EPURA for reasonable projects. The Plan is intended to be a guide for future funding decisions; highlights are listed below: k New Parks Shop Design (new building in 2005) 1 Bond Park Remodel, 2004 (design), 2007 and 2008 (renovation) k New Police Building, 2004 (design), (new building in 2006) k Payments for Lot 4, Stanley Historic District, refinanced Conference Center, and Performing Arts Center > Municipal Building Remodeling, 2003,2004 & 2007 k Museum Remodeling, Phase 11, 2004 k Annual Street Improvement Project (funded at increased levels in 2005 through 2008) k Post Office Parking Lot Reconstruction, 2005 k Tallant Park Reconstruction, 2008 * Various Streetscape Replace, 2008 1 Trail Construction, $150,000/yr. beginning in 2005 (additional funding available in the Open Space Fund) Stanley Park was not included as the Master Plan has not yet been prepared, and the Street Improvement Program was lowered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS , Town Board Study Session - July 23,2003 - Page 2 Discussion items included: â€¢ Confirmation that the CIP is a guide. â€¢ Confirmation that adoption of the CIP is not required. â€¢ Concern on how the public will interpret the project list â€¢ Within 30-45 days, a site location, operational study, and feasibility analysis will follow. â€¢ Concern that Stanley Park is not included on the CIP list. â€¢ Concern with substantial reduction of the Fund Balance. â€¢ Concern with the funds expended for Performance Park compared to sales tax generation. Trustee Jeffrey-Clark suggested staff prepare a prioritized list of projects, including how the Town could "partner" on these projects. Consensus was reached that the Town Board has no objection to the 5-yr. Capital Improvement Plan approach as presented, and staff should prepare an IGA based upon the figures presented earlier for the EPURA bond issue. There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 8:23 p.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, July 24,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 24~h day of July, 2003. Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Jeffrey-Clark, Newsom Attending: Trustees Jeffrey-Clark and Newsom Also Attending: Mayor Baudek, Town Administrator Widmer, Police Chief Richardson, Fire Chief Dorman, Town Attorney White, Commanders Filsinger and van Deutekom, Mgr. Bartram, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Chairman Gillette Trustee Jeffrey-Clark called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT. Faith Based and Community Partnership - Request authorization to provide services. Chief Richardson briefed the Committee on a Faith Based and Community Government Initiative Summit held for the purpose of exploring the possibility of sharing resources and developing partnerships between the faith community and local government. Based on information gathered from meetings, staff is recommending the Police Department be allowed to: 1. Provide after-hours services to distribute Salvation Army vouchers for food, gas or lodging. 2. Develop a shared database for those receiving services to better prevent abuse of the system. 3. Create an information page to be placed on the Town's website to list services available by the Faith Based and Community Partners. Discussion followed, with the Committee recommending the Police Dept. be authorized to provide services requested, specifically Items 1-3 described above. Amendment to Chapter 9.28.030 Drug Paraphernalia - Request approval of proposed ordinance. Commander Filsinger presented a proposed ordinance amending Chapter 9.28.030 Sale Unlawful - to read as follows: "It is unlawful for any person to sell, deliver, posses with intent to sell or deliver, or manufacture with intent to sell or deliver equipment, products, or materials knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that such equipment, products, or materials could be used as drug paraphernalia." This amendment more clearly follows State Statute, and it has been reviewed by Town Attorney White. Discussion followed, with the Committee favorably recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. Amendment to Chapter 9.18.010 Definitions (specifically skateboards) - Request approval of proposed ordinance. Commander Filsinger also presented a proposed ordinance that amends the definition of skateboards to include "motorized" as follows: "Skateboard means a device propelled by human or motorized power RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS . Public Safety Committee - July 24,2003 - Page 2 upon which any person may ride, which is composed of one or more wheels, none of which exceeds four inches in diameter and upon which is mounted a flat board or surface designed to carry one or more persons." Town Attorney White has reviewed this proposed ordinance. Following discussion, the Committee favorably recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. Amendment to Chapter 9.08.070 Concealed Weapons Permits - Request approval of proposed ordinance. Pursuant to Senate Bil124, Chief Richardson presented a proposed ordinance amending Chapter 9.08.070 that repeals this section in its entirety. The Bill rescinded the municipal Police Chiefs authority to issue said permits, and places same with only County Sheriffs. Town Attorney White has reviewed the proposed ordinance, and he added that certain ramifications have resulted in this Senate Bill: the Town cannot now bar concealed weapons in public buildings; it bans concealed weapons in public schools; a concealed weapons permit and ID must be carried on the permittee; allows weapons in vehicles (unless the driver is a convicted felon or under the influence); the Bill is a "state issue" and as such it prohibits home rule municipalities from adopting their own legislation; private entities are allowed to prevent their employees from carrying concealed weapons and from bringing weapons into their place of business - public entities are not granted the same consideration. Officers will receive extensive training on this issue. The Committee favorably recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. Amendment to Chapter 7.12.080 Kennel Restrictions - Request approval of proposed ordinance. Commander Filsinger reported that the proposed ordinance: (1) corrects a reference from Title 17 to Chapter 13.3 in the Estes Valley Development Code, and (2) permits the keeping of three adult dogs, over the age of three months. The increase from two to three adult dogs is in keeping with the Larimer County Land Use Code, thus enforcement should be less complicated. Town Attorney White has reviewed the ordinance. Approval of a kennel operation would be considered by the EVPC, and, if approved, would require a Business License. Concerning dog rescue operations, the Planning Staff is working on amendment to allow this use. The Committee favorably recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (LETA) Fees - Request approval of proposed resolution. The LETA Board annually prepares a resolution to establish the monthly access facility charge (9-1-1 fee) for telephone exchange and wireless communication; this fee is $.45/mo./phone (no change). The Committee favorably recommends approval of the resolution for rates effective 1/1/04. Reports. The Committee reviewed the NIBRS Second Quarter Incident Reports. CSO Update. From staffs perspective, this group is performing some of the functions effectively and efficiently. From the public's perspective, staff has received the following complaints, generally pertaining to removing the CSOs primary focus from traffic duties: TYPE OF COMPLAINT NUMBER RECEIVED TOTAL Telephone 7 Letters 4 11 PARKING TICKETS ISSUED PARKING TICKETS VOIDED 344 49 Â· ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - July 24,2003 - Page 3 MERCHANT VISITS 812 The Dept. met with CDOT and the countdown timers have worked very well. Additionally, the Dept. will be meeting with the Business Advocates to discuss the 2003 CSO Program. Staff believes jaywalking has not increased, and re- assigning CSOs has somewhat relieved potential Town liability issues. Discussion followed, with Mayor Baudek stating that pursuant to potential budget cuts, staff will be required to justify the CSO Program. Staff commented on False Alarms, confirming 3 written warnings result in an invoice. False Alarms have not been an issue thus far. FIRE DEPARTMENT. Donation of 14' Zodiac Dive Boat, Motor & Trailer to Thompson Valley Ambulance - Request approval. Fire Chief Dorman reported that the Platte River Power Authority recently issued a newer 16' Zodiac Dive Boat with a 40 HP Motor and Trailer to the Department. This equipment has a history of being donated from agency to agency and the Thompson Valley Ambulance Service has expressed an interest in the 14' boat. Thus, in keeping with tradition, the EPVFD has recommended this equipment be donated as stated above. The Committee favorably recommends approval of the donation by the EPVFD to the Thompson Valley Ambulance Service. Donation of 1980 Ford LN 7000 Haz Mat Truck to the American Red Cross - Request approval. In April, the Department received their new Rescue Truck, thus the 1980 Truck is now surplus. The Kodak Corp. originally donated this vehicle to the EPVFD and the Department is seeking approval to donate the 1980 truck to the American Red Cross for their storage of shelter supplies. These supplies have been stored at the Lake Estes Power Plant, however, due to Homeland Security issues, a new location must be located. Also in keeping with tradition, the EPVFD has recommended this equipment be donated as stated above. Storage of the vehicle has not yet been determined. The Committee favorably recommends approval of the donation by the EPVFD to the American Red Cross. Reports. The Committee reviewed the Second Quarter Incident Run Reports. Chief Dorman reported on the Open Burning Ban that he instituted at noon on July 21St. The ban on open fires includes: 1. Building, maintaining, attending or using fire for slash burning, campfires, recreational fires or educational fires. 2. Use of all fireworks including approved fireworks (i.e. sparklers, fountains). 3. Smoking on public property, except within an enclosed vehicle or building, or an area at least three feet in diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable material. 4. Welding or operating acetylene or other torch with an open flame on outdoor property unless the area is clear of all flammable materials. 1 . ' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS . Public Safety Committee - July 24,2003 - Page 4 Exceptions include: campfires or charcoal fires in approved developed campsites or picnic grounds with permanently constructed stationary masonry or metal fireplaces or grills specifically designed for the purpose of combustion, LPG or natural gas fired portable grills, other petroleum-fueled stoves, lanterns or heating devices, flares used by Public Safety agencies to warn the public of danger, training fires used by Public Safety agencies, or persons with a permit for such actions. The ban for both the Town and County is at the lowest level at this time. Unofficially, Chief Dorman reported that he is aware that the ISO Survey conducted last October will reduce the public protection class from a six (6) inside Town Limits and from a nine (9) outside Town Limits to a four (4). The Committee commended Chief Dorman and all associated for their excellent work on this project. There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 8:40 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 8-03 BEING A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A TELEPHONE EXCHANGE ACCESS FACILITY CHARGE AND A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ACCESS CHARGE FOR THE LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2004. WHEREAS, the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority was created pursuant to Â§ 29-11-101, et seq., C.R.S., by an Intergovernmental Agreement Concerning the Implementation of an "E911" Emergency Telephone Service, dated November 14, 1990, between certain governmental entities located in Larimer County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid statutory authority and by resolution of the Town - of Estes Park on May 8, 1990, and Ordinance No. 4-98 properly adopted by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, the Board of Trustees is authorized to raise, lower, or reestablish a telephone exchange access facility charge and a wireless communications access charge to be assessed telephone (wireline and wireless) service users in the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees deems that reestablishing the telephone exchange access facility charge at the rate of forty-five cents ($.45) per month and the wireless communications access charge at the rate of forty-five cents ($.45) per month is necessary and appropriate to adequately fund emergency telephone services in the Town of Estes Park; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Commencing on January 1, 2004, thetelephone exchange access facility charge and the wireless communications access charge shall each be reestablished at forty-five cents ($. 45) per month per exchange access facility or per wireless communications access. 2. Telephone service suppliers providing telephone service in the Town of Estes Park are authorized to collect the telephone exchange access facility charge in accordance with Â§ 29-11-101, et seq., C.R.S. 3. Wireless telephone service suppliers providing wireless telephone service in the Town of Estes Park are authorized to collect the wireless communications access charge in accordance with Â§ 29-11-100.5, et seq., C.R.S. 5 , Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of , 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, August 7,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 7th day of August 2003, Committee: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Barker and Habecker Attending: Chairman Doylen and Trustee Habecker Absent Trustee Barker Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Directors Joseph and Kilsdonk, Sr. Center Mgr. Thompson, and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. MUSEUM/SR. CENTER DEPARTMENTS. Senior Center User Agreement - Approval Request. Mgr. Thompson presented the revised Sr. Center User Agreement. Revisions to the Agreement are listed below: USER FULL USE ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM TOTALDUE SECURITY #102 #109 #114 #115 #HRS X DEPOSIT RATE 392 sf 360 sf 800 sf 1150 sf ..... Local Non-Profit 75.00/HR 25.00/HR 25.00/HR 30.00/HR 40.00/HR 50.00 Organization or $300/Day or or or $120/Day or $100/Day $100/Day $160/Day Other Recognized 150.00/HR 30.00/HR 30.00/HR 50.00/HR 75.00/HR 100.00 Club/Group/Person or $600/Day or or or $200/Day or $120/Day $120/Day $300/Day Applicants must submit all deposits at the time of reservation. Alcoholic beverages are not permitted at the Sr. Center. Users of the facility meeting on a regular basis must apply on an annual basis to renew the reservation. Use of coffee pots is permitted with advance notice and instruction on use. Catering for All Occasions (CAO) has exclusive access to, control and use of the kitchen at the Estes Park Sr. Center and all kitchen operations at this facility. CAO shall enter into separate agreements for catering services with each group that requests such a service. There is no cost to the Sr. Center associated with implementing these changes. Concluding all discussion, the Committee recommends approval of the Sr. Center User Agreement to include the revisions outlined above. REPORTS. Senior Center Bi-Monthly Report. Mgr. Thompson reviewed the following: â€¢ Food Service Privatization. The official transfer of the food services program was July 15, 2003. There was no disruption of service and the ease transition exceeded expectations. Congregate meals in July 2003 totaled 901. â€¢ Meals on Wheels (MOW) Volunteers. Staff is currently searching for a replacement for the MOW Coordinator. Drivers will be registered with Volunteers of America for additional insurance benefits while on duty. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - August 7,2003 - Page 2 * United Way Grant. The Sr. Center will receive $10,000 for the fiscal year July 2003 - June 2004 for meal subsidies. * "Do Not Call" Registry. Walt Richards is collecting and remitting names and telephone numbers of seniors who do not have computers and want to be registered for the State's "Do Not Call" list. Museum Bi-Monthly Report. Director Kilsdonk reviewed the following: * Museum Expansion Update. The contract for Part 1 of the expansion (to include the initial design and preparation of a preliminary guaranteed maximum value of $10,500) was signed on August 6'h. T.W. Beck Architects has already taken measurements and prepared initial drawings. Staff will return to the Committee for approval of Phase 2. * Wind Power Tour. The Museum received an overwhelming response to a tour of the Medicine Bow wind power site on Friday, August 1 st. * New Exhibit. The History of Estes Park Schools exhibit will open with a free reception on Monday, August 1801 from 5-7 p.m. â€¢ New Publication. /n the Vail of Elkhanah, a freestanding publication on Estes Park history, was donated to the Friends of the Museum by Dr. Jim Pickering. * Program schedule. * Attendance statistics for June and July. * A donation totaling $8,445 was received from the Estes Park Car Club. Trustee Habecker requested an event critique of the "Coolest Car Show" be presented at the September meeting. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. REPORTS. Building Permit Summary. Director Joseph presented a monthly Building Permit Summary from 1999-2003. Permit totals year-to-date are up 21% from the previous year. Items discussed include staffing, equipment, and efficiency improvements. American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Certification. Director Joseph announced the receipt of a department-wide American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) certification. This is the highest national standard of professional planning certification and involves education and practice requirements, as well as a written examination. The purpose of certification is both to,assist planners in their practice of sound, ethical planning and to assure the public that planners with such credentials have the expected expertise and that that expertise will be utilized in accordance with the AICP code of ethics. Town Marketing and Fulfillment - Discussion. Items discussed include objectives of the Task Force and Town Board expectations. Trustee Habecker requested this item be placed on the August 12th Town Board Agenda for further discussion by the entire Board. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 9:02 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk Estes Park Senior Center User Agreement 220 Fourth Street Estes Park, CO 80517 970/586-2996 email: jthompson@ estes.org Fax:970/577-3768 Please Print Applicant/Organization Name Senior Center/Museum Supported Club/Activity TOEP Senior Center/Museum Member - Private Use Local Non-Profit Other Recognized Club/Group/Person Applicant Address Responsible Person/Title Business Phone Home Phone Type of Function Date of Function Estimated Attendance Hours Requested Room Assigned (Includes set-up and clean-up hours) RENTAL OF ROOMS REQUIRES TWO-HOUR MINIMUM. DAILY RATES ARE 8 HOUR MAXIMUM. USER FULL USE ROOM ROOM ROOM #114 ROOM #115 TOTAL DUE SECURITY #102 #109 #HRS X DEPOSIT RATE 392 sf 360 sf 800 sf 1150 sf Senior Center or -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Museum Supported Club/Adivity Town Depts and TEP -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Supported Club/Activity Museum or Senior 60.00/HR 16.00/HR 16.00/HR 20.00/HR 32.00/HR 50.00 Member - Private Use Local Non-Profit 75.00/HR 25.00/HR 25.00/HR 30.00/HR 40.00/HR 50.00 Organization or $300/Day or or or $120/Day or $160/Day $100/Day $100/Day Other Recognized 150.00/HR 30.00/HR 30.00/HR 50.00/HR 75.00/HR 100.00 Club/Group/Person or $600/Day or or or $200/Day or $300/Day $120/Day $120/Day DONATIONS ARE OFTEN RECEIVED FROM GROUPS WHO HAVE NO FEE AND ARE VERY MUC -1 APPRECIATED. In consideration of the issuance of this requested facility use permit, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the Town of Estes Park and the Estes Park Senior Center. Inc. free and harmless from and against all claims or demands arising from any act. omissions. or negligence of the Applicant. their licensees, agents, servants. or employees. arising from any occurrence or accident causing. or allegedly causing. bodily injury (including liability for personal injury) or damage to property to whomsoever belonging arising out. or allegedly arising out of, the use of premises as defined in this Use Agreement or while in or about said premises, including all attorneys fees and court costs incurred by the Town of Estes Park and the Estes Park Senior Center. Inc. The undersigned hereby assumes personal and individual liability for himself and on behalf of Applicant for any damages to said facility or equipment occurring through or during the occupancy or use of said facility by the Applicant. The undersigned will leave said facility in a condition as good as or better than originally found. The undersigned personally and individually and on the behalf of the Applicant accepts liability for all repair to the facility and/or repair or replacement of equipment in the event of damage. The Town of Estes Park may withhold the deposit to apply toward cost of cleanup and repair. I have read the requirements and understand that I am responsible to see that they are met. I further understand that if these clean- up requirements are not met, all or part of the damage deposit may be held by the Town of Estes Park. and the organization I represent may be denied use of the building in the future. Applicant Signature Date Rev. 08/7/03 jt Estes Park Senior Center Director Date ESTES PARK SENIOR CENTER FACILITY USE GENERAL GUIDELINES The Senior Center is a Town of Estes Park facility. The first priority of facility use is to provide a place for the Senior Supported Activities/Clubs and meals of the Senior population. Secondly, rooms will be made available to the Town of Estes Park and charitable organizations as deemed appropriate at no fee. Thirdly, rooms may be rented to Individuals, Non-Profit Groups, and Other Recognized Clubs/Groups who are expected to sign and abide by the User Agreement. Agreements signed for meetings of an on-going nature will be valid for only one calendar year. Rental rates are subject to change by the Town of Estes Park with 30 days written notice. A. Each Applicant must complete a User Agreement. A person who will be in attendance and take responsibility to meet the agreement terms must sign the form. B. Applicants may schedule events up to one year in advance. C. Applicants must submit all deposits at the time of reservation and fees to the Senior Center director at least five days prior to building use. Receipt of the deposit confirms the reservation on a first-come. first served basis. D. Smoking is not permitted in any area of the Senior Center building or on the deck. E. Decorations may not be taped, tacked or pinned to any painted surface or walls. F. The Senior Center has a community bulletin board for public information. Notices must be approved by the director and/or the House Committee before posting. No flyers or printed material may be posted on the walls or in the windows of the Senior Center. G. Any request to use the building may be denied by the Senior Center director and/or House Committee for cause. H. The Senior Center will not provide storage space for any outside organization or individual. 1. Clean-up must be completed directly after the function. Next-day cleaning is not permitted. J. The Director or appointee will schedule all events and place them on the facility calendar. K. Applicants must occupy the facility at the time specified or forfeit use and fee for that date. L.. The meeting rooms shall not be considered permanent quarters for any organization, other than the Town of Estes Park and Estes Park Senior Center membership and their related activities. Users of the facility meeting on a regular basis must apply on an annual basis to renew reservation. M. Volume of loud speakers. etc. must be controlled so that only those in the room will be able to hear. N. All organizations using any of the Senior Center building meeting rooms shall be responsible to do their own room set-up and to restore rooms as they were found and according to attached sketches. Failure to do so may result in forfeiture of damage deposit. O. The Town of Estes Park and/or the Estes Park Senior Center reserves the right to cancel or change any scheduled event by giving 21 days notice. 2 P. Use of the coffee pots is permitted with advance notice and instructions on use. Q. The Town Administrator shall have the authority to effect reasonable rules and regulations not covered specifically in this document. S. Catering for Ati Occasions (CAO) has exclusive access to. control and use of the kitchen at the Estes Park Senior Center and all kitchen operations at this facility. CAO shall enter into separate agreements for catering services with each group that requests such services. Users of the facility are required to use CAO for all food services. Failure to comply with each of these user guidelines will result in a written notice. A second incident can result in revocation of user privileges. User Initials Date 3 Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Bob Joseph, Director and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: August 7,2003 Subject: Preliminary Condominium Map for Vista Ridge Condominiums and Final Condominium Map for Vista Ridge Condominiums Phase Background. Estes Investors, LLC has submitted a preliminary condominium map for Vista Ridge Condominiums and final condominium map for Vista Ridge Condominiums Phase I. Phase I consists of five units, Units 873, 875, 877, 879, 881, Building Bl, located on Lot 1, Vista Ridge Subdivision. The site is located on Crabapple Lane. All three lots are zoned "RM" multi-family residential. The condominium map is consistent with the approved development plan. An as-built development plan is required once construction of improvements is completed. The Planning Commission approved the preliminary condominium map at the July Vista Ridge Location Map 15,2003 meeting. Budget. None. \-L-U-- y:=21 Good Sarnar,lan Subdwision / / Action. 1 1 Approval of the preliminary condominiurn 1 TA ~--r ' CÂ»yolâ€¢ch Wâ€¢qi Wl.0-limillâ€¢1 2*/liM The Reserve - -- 11 Somb,-0 Ranch (Rix WalkÂ»r) map for Lots 1, 2, and 3 Vista Ridge Â·RE.1Â· Single-Family Re,idential Subdivision and the final condominium map for Vista Ridge Condominiums Phase 1 - -. Lot 1 Wildfire Ridge Addition Garage/Slorage Units r -RMÂ· Mult,-Family Relidintial to. Commercial Outlying Lone Pine Acies --f X -6'Undâ€¢veloped LL-_|-_* .0. Office E' Estate i I n r,-r-, 7-7 Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Bob Joseph, Director and Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 Date: August 7,2003 Subject: Supplemental (Final) Condominium Map for Park River West, Phase X Background. Richard H. Wille Trust has submitted a supplemental condominium map application for Park River West Phase X. Phase X consists of three units, Units 651, 653 and 655, Building 26, located on Lot 1, Park River West Subdivision. The site is adjacent to River Rock Condominiums on Moraine Avenue (CO Highway 36). Lots 1 and 2 of the Park River West Subdivision are zoned "RM" multi-family residential. The condominium map is consistent with the approved development plan with the exception of the proposed finished floor elevations. An as-built development plan is required once construction of improvements is completed. Location Map The Town Board approved the 149---' "' Supplemental Condominium Map for ~ ~ Park River West Phase IX at June 10, 2003 the meeting. River Rock Condominium Budget Ridgt None. ' .-,2 I 4 /. Action. Approval of the Supplemental - Park RiverWe;t Condominium Map for Park River West Phase X. 1 ll' 1 // 1 Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Bob Joseph, Director Date: August 8,2003 Subject: Mary's Lake Lodge Supplemental Condominium Map Background. This is the second / / h 4. -~~;,-<il 1 supplement to the final / / condominium map of Mary's Lake ~ Lodge, of which the preliminary f / H V map was approved in September /21 5/ All 2000, and the first supplement in 7 ~ Â· -Â·f' , ~7-- November 2001. 0 VAN This plan is consistent with the Â©04\ 1, ./ 10---3 development plan or preliminary - 1% condominium map. However, the --NV#J 1 development plan and preliminary 1 condominium map needs to be -%4 <-- amended to indicate what other impervious coverage will be removed to provide compliance with the impervious coverage limit. Budget. N/A Action. Staff recommends approval of the requested supplemental map, subject to the following condition: The development plan and preliminary condominium map shall be amended to indicate what other impervious coverage will be removed to provide compliance with the impervious coverage limit. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 15-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE, BLOCK SIX AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended numerous amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Block Six; and WHEREAS, said amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code are set forth on Exhibit "A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town that the amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Block Six set forth on Exhibit "A" and recommended for approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: The Estes Valley Development Code shall be amended as more fully set forth on Exhibit "A". Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of 2003 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2003, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk ~ Amendments to the Estes Valley ~ Development Code, Block Six ~ Estes Park Community Development Department ~i-=,0 Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~ PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com TOWN BOARD MEETING DATE: Aug. 12,2003 1*No ~: USES TITLE: Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Block Six 2 REQUEST: To make a number of changes ati and corrections to the adopted Estes Valley Development Code. lJSFS LOCATION: Estes Valley, inclusive of the Flvt/. 1 81.-y Town of Estes Park. APPLICANT: Estes Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: Please note recent revisions to Accessory Vehicle standards: (5)Limit on Parked or Stored Recreational Equipment and/or Recreational Vehicles on a Lot; and (6)Limit on Number of Parked or Stored Vehicles, Not Including Recreational Equipment and Recreational Vehicles,_on a Lot. Proposed code changes include: Accessory Uses (Including Home Occupations) and Accessory Structures, Employee Housing (Including Square Footage Allowed), Downtown Housing, i.e. Housing in "CD" Downtown Commercial Zoning District- | Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 1 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting ITEM 1 - ACCESSORY USES (INCLUDING HOME OCCUPATIONS) AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (Page 5-9 through 5-24) Staff Comment: Table titled "Accessory Uses (June 2003 Town Board Proposal)" is attached. This provides examples of the maximum square footage of accessory uses allowed on a residential lot based on net land area and principal building size. Â§ 5.2 ACCESSORY USES (INCLUDING HOME OCCUPATIONS) AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES A. General Standards. 1. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. 2. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. 3. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. 4. All accessory uses and structures shall comply with the following conditions: a. The accessory use or structure shall be clearly incidental and customarily found in connection with the principal use; and b. The accessory use or structure shall be conducted and/or located on the same lot as the principal use; and c. The principal use and accessory use shall be under the same ownership. B. Accessory Uses/Structures Permitted in the Residential Zoning Districts. 1. Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures. a. Listed Accessory Uses/Structures. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. b. Unlisted Accessory Uses or Structures. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. Table 5-1 Accessory Uses and Structures Permitted in the Residential Zoning Districts Residential Zoning District "Yes" = Permitted 6'No" = Not Permitted Additional Accessory Use RE-1 RE E-1 E R R-1 R-2 RM Requirements Accessory Dwelling Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Â§5.2.B.2.a Unit 1.33 times minimum lot area required Barns and Stables Yes Yes Yes No No ~ No No ~ No Staff Comment: No additional changes are proposed for Table 5-1. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 2 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting 2. Additional Requirements for Specific Accessory Uses/Structures Permitted in the Residential Zoning Districts. a. Accessory Dwelling Units. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC pnoposed. b. Family Home Day Care. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. c. Garages and Off-Street Parking Areas. (1) Such accessory use shall serve only the residents of the property, and shall not be used for commercial purposes. (2) For garages attached to or detached from a single-family dwelling: a. No more than thirty-two (32) linear feet of garage door(s) shall be orientated towards a front lot line; and b. No more than twenty-two (22) linear feet of garage wall, without architectural openings such as windows and doors, shall be oriented towards a front lot line. d. Home Occupations (1) Size/Area: A home occupation shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the principal building floor area, excluding garage space. (2) Location: Home occupations shall be integrated within the principal building in all zoning districts that allow home occupations. Except that on lots equal to or greater than one and a half acres (1.5) in size, home occupations may be detached from the principal building. (3) Employees: No one other than a resident of the dwelling shall be employed on-site, report to work at the site, or pick up supplies or products on-site in the conduct of a home occupation. This prohibition also applies to independent contractors. (4) Operational Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. (5) Exterior Appearance and Outdoor Storage Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. (6) Parking/Vehicles/Traffic: Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. e. Rentals. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. f. Storage or Parking of Vehicles, Recreational Equipment and Recreational Vehicles. (1) Only vehicles, recreational equipment and recreational vehicles owned by an occupant of a principal residential building may be parked or stored. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 3 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting (2) Parking or storage shall occur on the same lot as the principal residential use. Vehicles, recreational equipment and recreational vehicles that are on a lot are considered parked or stored. (3) Recreational equipment and recreational vehicles shall have no fixed connections to electricity, water, gas or sanitary sewer facilities, nor shall they be used for dwelling, business or commercial purposes or for any accessory uses in any zoning district. (4) Recreational equipment and recreational vehicles may be parked or stored outside if all of the following requirements are satisfied: (a) Recreational equipment and recreational vehicles may be parked no closer to the street than behind the front setback in a side yard. (b) Recreational equipment and recreational vehicles may be parked no closer than three (3) feet to a side or rear yard lot line. (5) Limit on Parked or Stored Recreational Equipment and/or Recreational Vehicles on a Lot. (a) Applicability. This Section applies to all recreational equipment and recreational vehicles that are not parked or stored in a fully enclosed garage. (b) As Accessory to Single-Family and Two-Family Principal Uses. No more than a total of two (2) pieces of recreational equipment and/or recreational vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot of two (2) acres or less. No more than a total of three (3) pieces of recreational equipment and/or recreational vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot greater than two (2) acres, but less than five (5) acres. No more than a total of four (4) pieces of recreational equipment and/or recreational vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot greater than five (5) acres. (c) As Accessory to Town Home or Multi-Family Principal Uses: No more than one (1) piece of recreational equipment or one (1) recreational vehicle shall be parked or stored for every ten (10) dwelling units. (6) Limit on Number of Parked or Stored Vehicles., Not Including Recreational Equipment and Recreational Vehicles, on a Lot. (a) This applies to all vehicles that are not parked or stored in a fully enclosed garage. (b) As Accessory to Single-Family and Two-Family Principal Uses. No more than a total of four (4) vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot of two acres or less. No more than a total of five (5) vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot greater than two (2) acres, but less than five (5) acres. No more than a total of six (6) vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot greater than five (5) acres. No more than a total of eight (8) vehicles shall be parked or stored on a lot greater than five (10) acres. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 4 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting C. Accessory Uses and Structures Permitted in the Nonresidential Zoning Districts. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. D. General Dimensional and Operational Requirements. The following standards shall apply to all accessory uses and structures in all zoning districts, except for: (1) Satellite antenna dishes accessory to residential uses that are one (1) meter or less in diameter; and (2) Satellite antenna dishes accessory to nonresidential uses that are two (2) meters or less in diameter. 1. Time of Estab#shment. No accessory use shall be established and no accessory structures shall be allowed on the subject parcel until all required permits and approvals for the principal use or activity have been obtained. 2. Setbacks. No accessory use, structure or activity, except for permitted fences or walls shall be located or take place within a required setback. On residential lots of less than one acre all accessory buildings, excluding detached garages, shall be located no closer to the front property line than the residential dwelling. 3. Setbacks from Easements. No accessory structure shall be located within any platted or recorded easement or over any known utility. 4. Maximum Building or Structure Size for Non-Residential Uses. Except as otherwise expressly limited or allowed in this Section, and except for structures containing accessory nightly rentals and for accessory recreational facilities including swimming pools, freestanding accessory buildings and structures shall not be larger than one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. 5. Maximum Cumulative Gross Floor Area Allowed for all Accessory Uses in Accessory Buildings, Accessory Structures and/or Principal Buildings for Residential Uses. Maximum cumulative gross floor area for all accessory uses, excluding accessory nightly rentals, in accessory buildings, accessory structures and/or principal buildings shall not exceed the largest computation of the following: a. One thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet of gross floor area; b. Fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal building, excluding the attached garage floor area; c. For lots with a net land area greater than one half (1/2) acre and less than or equal to one (1) acre: 500+[1,000(a)]*. d. For lots with a net land area greater than (1) acre: 1,400+MOO(a)]*. *Where "a" = net land area in acres 6. Maximum Number of Freestanding Accessory Buildings and Structures, Including Detached Garages, Per Single-Family Residential Lot. No Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 5 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting more than one (1) accessory building or structure less than or equal to one hundred and twenty (120) square feet and no more than two (2) accessory buildings or structures greater than one hundred and twenty (120) square feet shall be allowed on a lot of two and half (2.5) acres or less. 7. Building or Structure Height. The height limitations set forth in the underlying zoning districts shall apply to all accessory buildings and structures located therein. 8. Building Separation. Staff Comment. No Change Proposed. 9. Dwelling Unit Prohibited. Staff Comment: No Change Proposed. 10. Operations. Staff Comment: No Change Proposed. 11. Limits on Mobile Homes/RV's. Staff Comment: No Change Proposed. Â§13.3 DEFINITIONS OF WORDS, TERMS AND PHRASES 110. Garage shall mean an accessory building or a portion of the principal building, including carports, for the private accessory use of the owner or occupant of a principal building intended for storage of motor vehicles and equipment with no facilities for mechanical service or repair of a commercial or public nature. All area within the walls enclosing the garage shall be considered garage space. For carports, all area under the roof shall be considered garage space. Carport shall mean a garage that is open on at least two sides. 198. Recreational Vehicle shall mean a wheeled vehicle, required by the State to have a vehicular registration, built on a chassis that can be towed, hauled or driven and primarily designed as a temporary dwelling for recreation, vacation and travel use, including, but not limited to, travel trailers, truck campers, tent trailers, pick-up campers, camping trailers and self-propelled motor homes. Home Occupation shall mean a business, profession, occupation or trade that is conducted for gain as an accessory use within a dwelling unit, or accessory building by a resident of the dwelling unit. Recreational Equipment shall include, but is not limited to, the following: boats; golf carts; all terrain vehicles; snowmobiles; horse trailers; and jet skis. Staff Comment: number to be assigned by Colorado Code Publishing Company. ITEM 2 - EMPLOYEE HOUSING (Pages 5-19 to 5-20) Â§ 5.2.C ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES PERMITTED IN THE NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 2. Additional Requirements for Specific Accessory Uses in the Nonresidential Zoning Districts. a. Employee Housing. (1) Defined. Accessory dwelling unit(s) for an owner, operator or employee of the principal use or business located on the site (shall include 'caretakers quarters"). (2) Standards. Employee housing shall be subject to the following development Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 6 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting and operational standards: (a) Dwelling units used for employee housing shall comply with all applicable provisions of this Code. (b) Only one (1) unit of employee housing per principal use shall be allowed for the purpose of providing caretaker quarters. (c) The twenty-five (25) percent increase in the floor area ratio permitted in Â§5.2.C.2.a.(3) shall only be used for employee housing. (d) Except in the CD zoning district, a minimum of one (1) off-street parking space shall be provided for each employee housing unit containing eight hundred square feet of gross floor area or less and two (2) off-street parking spaces for each employee unit greater than eight hundred square feet, in addition to the required parking for the principal use or business. (e) Employee housing shall be occupied only by the owner, operator, caretaker or an employee of the principal use, plus his or her immediate family. (f) Employee housing shall not be occupied or rented for a term of tenancy less than thirty (30) days. (g) Employee housing shall not be rented to the general public (non-employees) for accommodation or residential purposes, except that where employee housing has been provided for a seasonal summer work force, such housing may be used for residential purposes only (not accommodations) during the off-season with approval of Staff. (3) Formula for the Provision of Employee Housing. The amount of employee housing shall be allowed as follows: (a) Commercial/Retail/Industrial/Recreation Uses: One (1) unit of employee housing per the first one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of gross floor area of the principal use(s). One additional employee housing unit per each additional two thousand two hundred fifty (2,250) square feet of gross floor area of the principal use(s). (b) Accommodation Uses: One (1) unit of employee housing per seven (7) guest rooms or units. (c) In no case, however, may the total actual density or intensity of the project, including the employee housing, exceed one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the maximum density or commercial intensity (FAR) permitted by the zoning district regulations. (4) Restrictive Covenant Required. Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 7 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting ITEM 3 - HOUSING IN THE "CD"DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL (Pages 4-21) Â§ 4.4. NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Â§4.4.C. DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS Table 4-5: Density and Dimensional Standards for the Nonresidential Zoning Districts. Table 4-5 Density and Dimensional Standards Nonresidential Zoning Districts Minimum. Land Minimum Building/Structure . A Area per Minimum Lot Size [71 Setbacks 141 Max. Accommodation or Building MaL Lot Zoning Residential Unit Area Width Front Side Rear Height Max. Coverage District (sq. ft. per unit) (sq m (ft.) (ft) (ft.) (ft) (ft) FAR (%) A Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. A-1 Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. Accommodation Units Only = Iflot 1,800; abuts SF & 2-Family SF & 2- a (stand-alone) = Family resi- Iflot 9,000; Accomrno Mini- den- abuts a (stand- dation uses alone) = mum = 8 tial residential 25; CD Dwelling Units (1St = 20,000 Maxi- prop- property = 30 2.0 Wa Floor) 1 unit per All other MF (stand- alone) = mum = erty = 10; 2,250 square feet uses = n/a 16 10; All other 100; of gross land area A11 cases = 0 All other other Dwelling Units uses = Wa (2nd Floor) No cases =0 minimum gross land area per unit CO Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. o Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. CH Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. 1-1 Staff Comment: No changes to EVDC proposed. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block 6 8 July 8,2003 Town Board Meeting Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) Board Meeting Date: June 09,2003 Members Present: Susan Doylen, Karla Porter,Eric Blackhurst, Catherine Jensen, Jack Dinsmoor Members Absent: Staff Present: Rita Kurelja, Sam Betters, Rich Ekwall, Frank Lans Others Present: Joe Wise, Christie Charles Guests: The June 09,2003 meeting of the Estes Park Housing Authority was called to order by Chairperson Susan Doylen at 8:35 a.m. in Room 203 of the Estes Park Municipal Building APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made to approve the April 901 2003 and June 11111,2003 minutes of Estes Park Housing Authority Board o f Directors meetings by Jack Dinsmoor and seconded by Eric Blackhurst. Vote was called for and all voted Aye. Motion passes. OUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORTS - No financial reports. Due to the timing of the Board meeting this month and the July 4th Holiday the 2nd Quarter Financials were not presented. They will be ready for the August meeting. DEVELOPMENT UPDATES Talon's Pointe Apartments- Rick Ekwal reported on Talons Pointe. 6 of the 7 buildings have been delivered by Drahota. Landscaping in the process of being completed now. Drahota plans to be offsite by 7/18. Discussion on carpet in club house- has some flaws. Manufacturer will proceed as we wish. Issue with sidewalks adjacent to handicap parking spaces. Slope is too steep to meet ansi code and ADA requirements Will Birchfield, TEP building official is waiting for letter from Cornerstone Engineering addressing this issue. Leasing- Frank Lans reported that 21 leases had been signed to date with another scheduled and 7 or 8 more in the process. Will now begin going through Lone Tree wait list. Still ahead of lease up schedule. Development Budget- Sam Betters reported that budget should come in approximately $300,000 under budget. Open House: July 151 Invitations are out. Will have 4 speakers, including Tom Hart (former DOH director), Rich Widmer, Sue Doylen and a CHFA representative. Vista Ridge Rich Ekwal reported on a few scheduling issues. (a scheduling document was distributed). Condo mapping has begun. Will work with Title companies to expedite the Condo mapping recording process. Closings on building B-2 will have to be moved. The other buildings should be fine. Seven affordable units are under contract and 1 market rate. 3 BR. EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page 1 Joe Wise addressed the FHA issue. Sam Betters reported on the progress or lack of with FHA to date. Mr. Wise strongly suggests we have this no later than the end of the month. - COMMITTEE REPORTS Communications to Report - none to report. REPORTS UPDATES & OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Cleave Street : Mr. Ekwal reported on the rehab at Cleave Street including the remodel of unit 8. This would include making the one bedroom larger, installing hardwood floors in the 'study' and French doors at the entrance (ofthe study). Estimate to complete is $3885 which includes replacement of carpet and painting. This amount has already been approved by the board. Cleave Street currently has 3 vacancies. Intergovernmental Agreement: All Board members had been given a copy to review last month. Mr. Betters outlined the agreement and fielded questions from the Board members. Motion to approve the agreement as presented was made (Eric Blackhurst) and seconded (Jack Dinsmoor). Vote was called for and the motion to approve passed. CARHOF: Rita reported the the EPHA had been awarded $1200 to be used for down payment assistance from the Estes Park Board ofRealtors. $100,000 fund transfer to Estes Investors: Sam distributed a document outlining the 3 options the Board has in how to treat the transfer made of $100,000 (one hundred thousand dollars) from the EPHA to Estes Investors LLC and explained each option. Discussion ensued. Motion was made by Eric Blackhurst to treat the transfer as a straight loan, from EPHA to EI for a term of 2 years at an interest rate of 6.5%. Motion was seconded by Jack. All voted Aye and motion passes. ADJOURN No further discussion- meeting was adjourned at 9:47 am. Respectfully submitted, Rita Kurelja Estes Park Housing Authority Program Manager EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page 2 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS - . Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission July 15, 2003, 1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Commission: Chair Wendell Amos, Commissioners George Hix, Bill Horton, Joyce Kitchen, Edward Pohl, Richard Homeier, and One Vacancy Attending: Chair Amos, Commissioners Hix, Kitchen, Pohl, and Homeier Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott, Town Board Liaison Habecker and Recording Secretary Williamson Absent: Director Joseph, Bill Horton, One Vacancy Chair Amos called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated June 17, 2003. b. AMENDED PLAT LOTS 3,9 & 10, HIGH DRIVE HEIGHTS, 1541 HIGH DRIVE, 1591 HIGH DRIVE, and 767 LARKSPUR DRIVE, Applicant: Ramona Carmichael, Donna Sherbeneau, Ronald Smith, Betty Shuler, William & Roger Ricketts - Adjust Boundary Lines Between 3 Lots. Conditions of Approval: 1. The lots should be labeled "3A", "9A", and "10A" instead of Lots 1,2 & 3. 2. Compliance with Town Attorney White's memo dated June 23,2003. 3. Pursuant to C.R.S.30-28-110, sub-section 4(a), "no plat for subdivided land shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners unless at , the time of the approval of platting the subdivider provides the certification of the county treasurer's office that all ad valorem taxes applicable to such subdivided land, for years prior to that year in which approval is granted, have been paid." 4. Within thirty (30) days of the Board's approval of the amended plat, the developer shall submit the plat for recording. If the plat is not submitted for recording within this thirty-day time period, the approval shall automatically lapse and be null and void. c. AMENDED PLAT MICHENER MOUNTAIN LAND, NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T4N, R73W, 3456 MOUNTAIN SIDE DRIVE, Applicant: Joan Foote, President, Michener Mountain Land Inc. - Vacate and Replace Existing Easements. Conditions of Approval: 1. Compliance with Town Attorney White's memo dated June 23,2003. 2. Compliance with Larimer County Engineering's memo dated June 27, 2003. 3. A 1 /8-hatched border shall be placed around the perimeter of the lot, and the lot should be labeled "Lot l A". 4. Pursuant to C.R.S.30-28-110, sub-section 4(a), "no plat for subdivided land shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners unless at the time of the approval of platting the subdivider provides the certification of the county treasurer's office that all ad valorem taxes applicable to such subdivided land, for years prior to that year in which approval is granted, have been paid." 5. Within thirty (30) days of the Board's approval of the amended plat, the developer shall submit the plat for recording. If the plan is not submitted for recording within this thirty-day time period, the approval shall automatically lapse and be null and void. It was moved and seconded (Poht/Hix) that the Consent Agenda items (a), (b), and (c) be accepted and it passed unanimously with 1 absent and 1 vacancy. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commissiot' 2 , July 15,2003 d. VISTA RIDGE PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, LOT 1, WILDFIRE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, Applicant Estes Investors, LLC - 61 Unit Condominium Development. It was moved and seconded (Homeier/Hix) that the Consent Agenda item (d) be accepted and it passed unanimously with 1 absent, 1 vacancy and Kitchen abstaining. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. REPORTS Planner Chilcott gave a brief update concerning the rerouting of the electric lines for the Amended Plat of Lot 14, Block 6 Country Club Manor Addition to the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, Together with the Vacated 20''of Fir Avenue Adjoining Subject Property on the West Side and Lot 1, Block 5, Amended Plat of Blocks 4 and 5, and Lot 4, Block 3, Hyde Park Addition, which was approved by the Planning Commission at the June 17, 2003 meeting. Staff determined that it would not be feasible to relocate the electric service underground. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 1:40 p.m. Wendell Amos, Chair Jacquelyn Williamson, Recording Secretary POLICE DEPARTMENT Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsinger Date: July 31, 2003 Re: Amendment to Municipal Ordinance Background: Municipal Code Section #9.28.030 prohibits the sale of drug paraphernalia. The wording in the ordinance is more restrictive (from the perspective of the prosecution) than the wording contained in the state statute prohibiting the sale of drug paraphernalia, and staff believes an amendment more clearly follows state statute. Town Attorney Greg White has reviewed the proposed ordinance. Budget. There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: The Public Safety Committee has recommended approval of the ordinance. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 11 -03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.28 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, THE SAME RELATING TO DRUG PARAPHERNALIA WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to amend Chapter 9.28 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 9.28.030 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park is amended to read as follows: ' Chapter 9.28.030 Sale unlawful. It is unlawful for any person to sell, deliver, possess with intent to sell or deliver, or manufacture with intent to sell or deliver equipment, products, or materials knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that such equipment; products, or materials could be used as drug paraphernalia. Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of ,2003. Town Clerk Police Department, Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsinger Date: July 31, 2003 Re: Amendment to Municipal Ordinance Background: Municipal Code Section 9.18.010 Definitions - defines skateboards as being "a device propelled by human power....." Motorized skateboards are now available and there are some that are locally owned. The current ordinance does not include a motorized skateboard in the definition and therefore it would appear that the current restrictions do not apply to the motorized skateboards. Town Attorney Greg White has reviewed the proposed ordinance. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: The Public Safety Committee has recommended approval of the ordinance. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 12-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, THE SAME RELATING TO SKATEBOARDS, ROLLERBLADES, AND BICYCLES WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to amend certain sections of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 9.18.010 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park is amended to read as follows: 9.18.010 Definitions. (d) Skateboard means a device propelled by human or motorized power upon which any person may ride, which is composed of one or more wheels, none of which exceeds four inches in diameter and upon which is mounted a flat board or surface designed to carry one or more persons. - Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at the meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of ,2003. Town Clerk Estes Park Police Department Memo To: The Honorable Mayor John Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Lowell C. Richardson, Chief of Police Date: 07/31/03 Re: Repeal Concealed Weapons Ordinance Background: The 2003 Colorado Senate Session passed Senate Bill 24 in an attempt to standardize issuance of concealed weapons permits by law enforcement officials. This bill has rescinded municipal police chiefs authority to issue concealed weapons to the public. The new law passed authorizes only County Sheriffs to issue concealed weapons permits effective May 2003. Budget None Recommendation: The Public Safety Committee has recommended approval of the repealed ordinance. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 13-03 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 9.08.070 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, THE SAME RELATING TO CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that pursuant to recent legislation it is in the best interest of the Town to delete, in its entirety, Section 9.08.070 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 9.08.070 of the Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2003. Town Clerk Police Department Memo To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Commander Gregg Filsinger Date: July 31, 2003 Re: Amendment to Municipal Code Background: A review of Municipal Code Section 7.12.080 has revealed an incorrect reference to Title 17. The Code has been reviewed for further modification to provide uniformity with the Development Code, EVDC Â§13.3. The proposed ordinance corrects the reference and permits a person to have up to three adult dogs before obtaining a Kennel License. Budget There are no budget implications associated with this request. Action: The Public Safety Committee has recommended approval of the ordinance. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 14-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7.12.080 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, THE SAME RELATING TO KENNEL RESTRICTIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to amend certain sections of the Municipal Code of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be amended to read: It is unlawful for any person to keep or maintain a kennel for the keeping of dogs within the Town limits, except where kennels are permitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.3.129 of the Estes Valley Development Code. Section 2. That Section 7.12.080 Kennel restrictions shall be further amended to read: As used herein, kennel shall mean a commercial or noncommercial use with indoor and/or outdoor facilities for the keeping, breeding, boarding, or training of four (4) or more adult dogs, over the age of (3) months shall be kept. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Â£003 ;EL jsn6nv Estes Park Housing Authority, 4 C = - U '1 - A A;AEA Project Updates ave received Certificate of I,alons-Poi-Big 35 of the 44 units have been leased uo uouuqaial asnOH uadO UB pgasOH aptkiale}S PaA!0331 Â§1;q 3}Ulod SUOIKL Uo!}!U8033.I q,5 I *f I J . . . .. 4 4 e D 4 4 ., I . 0 1 I . . 0 4 . ... . I . . . 4 09 O 2 o OL e (,1 r- AAXAAAAXAAA Talons Pointe Residents 5 Restaurant Workers 1 Veterinarian Technician Sie>IJOM uonon seehold u,3 eBeil!A Ue~~4~~~~,80 z Mail Carrier siedeeyesnOH 9 6 Retail Clerks Sle)IJOM oinv Â£ Je>IJOM eOUEUelu!el/\I L 4 1~4- 4,-=~.75 -e ., 4 .L&* 11 n -1 1 .",d,i ..m,4.1 f - - 111 11.11 4 1 1 \ 1 7 4 014 . EU , Â·Â· :6 - p' + 4 1 t. ' 3 A . ': t ..11,17&<Al + ..- p*,Al>~- ~2 -~4 -I % rÂ·. . - -- evre ib ki. i.,r t.~ - ~ I . ..4.62** k. . 4:47â€¢Â· 4,4. NA:, 4 PrE Tr - 4.*ly ,; li E. 0 ' 41 , 1 9 IiI '/ iMi 9 *F J Â·liÂ·,2 - ...4% ./ . I -- - trI - 91...~ , ./ r Â· I I ' .1 F f' i .41 E 10*01 W'':'fâ€¢/ '/* I . 4Â» % 17 . kfi .t. 3 A '01 IÂ¢'.41 ft* 1 4.1 U . A' C :/. r ; I 4 *r: 6 . b .. tl y.j, 1 ..1 1 f . 24$ .: 5 1,4, ..4 ' 1 * % 1 .1 - . 0. ..f**,1 Â· f 99Â·f (91Â¢~ 'f 4*.6, t' R T -9.2 1 'C* 2.4 1 1 --X-,t 4Â» n 1 1.9/I' . .,t, . .4.9 'r 4 ...1.4*L '' 9 4 *. *F. - ~;*Â¥:i -.'r ;14 .3 2 , I . t. 2 'e '4Â·..et-4 - 1 1 5.20, ill. ...;p-'It e & ty . i. H 1 1 -1 4, 61:3 0 I 01 4. ..... il' i 1-iN 9 4. '. 1 *4' - F :I ~ ~'$ , 4%-: 144 12 5.-8 -=~r.~-2 .gma '1 5.WI-~ im@.1,41 tail-*:. '-a.f V 1, - 1 1 , In t<:40Â°iffietii' i < 64% i .t A DP, ~ m W- - I 2,#:pxj *~ i 4- 27â€¢%- 20 v ES,mae.r I W .1 ' /*Â»/7:Â·~i'/ ~i~rl ~<'lf#?.1 â‚¬'itt ... .3. * 7'0~jeÂ»P<.â€¢-'--r Li"~ r'',-0 b ./. ... . I il,1 WEE<\ -- 1- , j.'. 0= - 1 3%42 441: : /4:l:DIS - i :41* I MI:t 3% '.- 1 - I./- 1- H ' 3 ./.7 1 A. 1 Â»* 1 1/ 11 L El 1 4 ' I . ,--' -:,-1 k< *u 1 i.. ~:â€žâ€¢,i~Ui ,10â€¢~.,~ --E~~1 it '0 ".w I -.4 ./~ r. 1 :,9 - 1 f 1 4 ' I I L -â€¢= t' ;t . 0, P Fi t 7 41 4,4 d I .,.rl"/ '00.1 'llil=.. ti 1.111/.. N.k#' ~-â€¢i 3 'i ',;, 9 49, ..1 #, . ,/t Â·j 1 a ' . 60.' 'l#F .':. t ... .-4 :1 411, . deiN Â· ' 4/ 1 9111 G i ]14'10: *' 6, A U I ./. Â· , 2.~/*rfÂ·*.0. , r 1 4 '14 /421 , 11-4 3 11 .A . 1 41 1 tial'.3 *4,/ / '4 t.1 , 1 1, r ; b 7 . 3 1, 0 - f ?1, . f r 1 1111:Iii 31 1=11 N -144/1 Â¥ ' 12 ~ r.6, "12â€¢ 41*r~:4 1% . 1-'4.4*M*eff@11/C' '1' ., 1-1 M; 1 . 1 =l, 11%Â« r V ' 1 .4 -Â» . . i = .:,114 44 , 4/7). 1 Â»-Lk =-Uk ' -2 I 11:U I 1 'n , i i 1 .i 1 3 1Â» ---- 4 fireli.'MiMY t , ".a'l:* 1 + .4417 :141 Irl I:*gitti~Rm litigi IvIET .1, 3 . Or* 7 4.4 ..4 A 1 k :24-- , 4341 . 3291 4** t'. i 2. 1 & 1.=1 114:I 4 . 4 t tri 11 11 "1 Â·Â· . 11 P'.411'11 11,1, i , 111.1 lilli/1 11 4 0 Â¢ 9"% // 4 '1 1 111 1 . I. )' 'll'1'l Ij''I| '1, 47 ..1 1111~11111111111 9 -,1 )1 1 1 11 1 1111'1111.1. I .:lili '111111 lf'lli f 41':,1 111 111 :01 1 7 e~ 41' 11 thlA l. 1 1 11 1 6 % 442 1 4â€ž60. . If.' . 0.,rd! MT lili 11'~111,4 =1 4 XIiI'lili dll , fj 11,11111110 MK, .* Eli lili lili IiI 4 - u ..6 41 lilli 11 . ret? /1 . 1 lili ~:} fl' ~1~1111-?L '4 :i: 34 i 9, iÂ«-67 9, , 1 #92,41 :AK. 6+ . 9/.,%4%1114; >10>(4:Ek -lt: 1 ' 9Â·:el 6 4 %# * i ~Â·' : . '~ 1 6~(C*4._. Â·. - 7. ~ Ut .tyÂ·Ov,f~;~ft'%-1*vk Â·1 L 4 : .4.';32 '%424'*fF'*:.1 :. ~ t.' Â°i'Â« :Â· i .437<j>>A rffÂ¥Â»4Â¢07 9,~;Â· Â· ~ '~ ~~Â·U t<.~243'4â‚¬*rhaft p *t:?0*3 '~ '~ try.ig; t. .1=24%* glei- 4 -,L j 4 Lf i 4 tf 34 1 Club House Interior 1 Â£),7.9 1 I 3*3'Â· ? Â¥ 44.Ex I N . ..2 11, 9 . 4,. 1 1 1 . .... ... ,. 1.~ . .:.ti .4 1.1., 111 4 1 1 .T. -.â€¢:i~.il ' 4 4 7 . . .' .ki,i,Uii#"fit?Â¢4** ../.-I..."./"rt Â· .lilli -Â·QI.?:-LA :â‚¬33963-; l Ai A A Phase one is approximately 60 days 7 of the 8 Affordable units are under pelluoo Jepun s! 1!un elehl le>peIN L Vista Ridge from completion -I""40'lli. elep 01 GAB4 61!un elqeplogÂ¥ 341 Jo Ilv sluepisek:I >lied sels3 01 plos ueeq GAew -d--*- 1084uoo -11~ W,Â« 2 6 19* 1 -73792'3 ilillill" il Â§Â¢.14.9 ' -r*15 w, , MY .1, ./ I. 4- 2,Â· %~ A 0.... p ' I?Â»f .(AP t# A /4/ 7 - r.4 VEful' Â« 3. Â£ 3 i Dft *22 3 TE. 0 ..7 i. -/r eÂ· I.e- r;. ' 4 y#?a A Ab, 4 * iw , ~ .21.2 . tri. ittq. h ' 0 &/ 4/ I 4 'E 7 4.12 %1~i Â· ./Â· I I. " , *9\42 i I '. k j.4.:t'~' A'? <~ Â· I . .Le:.,at ~t. f.tÂ°,4 c<(~~ .l~?i: ' . $.41 4 Â·Â·â€¢ 111.{2*42 Â»1. Â·'Â¥ 3. 3 ././. - i . .3 k. ;* Xk,1.,Na 444'. Â·' f *'In 4,4 .7 '~.44% 4 t â€¢4 9 , . 4Â»4 -~4 1 2 1< EFEâ„¢.4 41'i .'.: . . Â· . Off I 11 - . .qq# ' 1. 24 \ F IN /4. .. I \Di i $ Â·Â· ./A 4 4/ b. 17111.1 ; Vvx / hq ; if,~r"*-: ~t.-/&4=74.: ~ ' ll Â«94.42Â¥ ..1 I 1, 0,4 1 0 09'. ' 13 ./ r '-v 701 ' 4 1-Â·,2 I . ' '3 40+ *4 I . f. 179* ./1 r. 1 t , 411;k /1 E . 4 *W' Â«ta . .1:4.... [ Vista Ridge 4 1 *s . &4 1 %9. l 1 .,1 4 - i ,1 1. i - i . - *12 4X Q 433. ..4 9. 3 1 Mt 'i' A % i la.., 92Â» 42% ... 41* h 76 1%3.*/:, ./ i K P I ; - 1 . It . 11'E ./. 0,) A Fi -/ 3 , +309â€¢,1 0Â·My,% 4 . ' Y 14 - 21.-' . r 4,1 - E-*i / 2, 4. 1 ... 1'. 11,4 M .4 3. i. '~ 141 3" 1(.i. , I. 1 4 > 4 2.1 ' r -,1 Â¥ 7~3 - i , r .14 Â· 9 N Â·9â‚¬4 P- ---1....Rowle, 2" 11, 44 -ailli~ .i~.~:'~b''t<*Â«fi,-lfty - 1.9 A V 1\ 1.- ilillillilibili%ilillk*-i- ..07- \ 4.2 .3 46>11 1 0. . r, I Ui, 11'+--3- i ) .1 *ah . 41:,4 -(,di 1, ~ + i, . 1211+7{ 3 - 1/ 1 ' ~'/:.'. ~~' t.;i, '; <U ~~~' ~fÂ·~1 ,.~ 4'0 9 Â»Â« ..Fpp Â¢5 2 - C '1 .4 21., Vit}tk * 6 1 -ista Ridge ~ . -%0= I 1 'it 41 ./ ' im :=79 i 114 i 4 ~.it L 11 K -6.1 f 3-2 L 6;Â·f RE 6 ..:14. 2. .... 54 ' C . 4. t.tr 4/4 > 1/ - , Â·rby !(344 1*442 'A, . ite . : 9 7 - U - . 4 4 I 4.y>Aut r: 4 21 j? 412:.4 U rÂ·.'- 4-:.49' 1 c LÂ·Â·FÂ·'Â·0 R i ift. '"*4 /4,- Pl Â· i 4 .. FULFILLMENT TASK FORCE DESCRIPTION July 2003 1. PURPOSE - The purpose of the Task Force is to examine the fulfillment activities of the Town of Estes Park's advertising program and recommend future directions. "Fulfillment" refers to the response provided to contacts, or leads, generated by the Town's advertising program. This may be in the form of 800-number calls, E-mail, or direct contact at the Visitor's Center, and may also include a web site, vacation planner, and other items. 2. MEMBERS - The following are members of the Task Force: â€¢ Rich Widmer, Town Administrator - Facilitator â€¢ Jeff Barker, Trustee â€¢ Kathy Asche â€¢ Deeva Boleman â€¢ Peggy Campbell â€¢ Don Cheley â€¢ Bruce Grant â€¢ Judy Haggard â€¢ Kent Meyer â€¢ Al Wasson â€¢ Ted Williams 3. SCHEDULE - The Task Force will begin by July 16, 2003 and finish its work and submit its recommendations to the Town Board by September 17,2003. 4. STAFFING - Town staff members will provide research support and background information as requested. 5. TOWN BOARD CONSENSUS - The Town Board at its retreat June 4, 2003, came to the following consensus: â€¢ The advertising leads are not free - recipients must pay their fair share. â€¢ Oversight of the advertisement fulfillment function must be resolved and is key to further negotiations. â€¢ A "Blue Ribbon" committee be appointed to study the issues further. Following the retreat, the Mayor sent a letter to the Estes Park Chamber Resort Association (EPCRA) advising them of the Town Board's intent to consider the termination of the existing fulfillment agreement between EPCRA and the Town when it expires September 30,2003. .. 6. OTHER ISSUES - The Task Force will be provided background information on the history of the Town/EPCRA relationship and other issues and options discussed by the Town Board. Some of these issues and options include: â€¢ Do nothing other than update the existing contract between EPCRA and the Town; â€¢ Negotiate a completely new relationship with EPCRA with the Town assuming greater oversight and EPCRA required to impose an equalization fee on out-of-town businesses for access to the advertising leads; â€¢ The Town performing most of the functions now being performed by EPCRA; â€¢ Create a Marketing District encompassing just the Town boundaries. The Marketing District would assume most of the functions of the EPCRA, with funding coming from the Town, user fees, and the equalization fee; â€¢ Implement Home Rule and establish a Marketing District to include the Town plus Estes Park area. This Marketing District could establish a funding mechanism utilizing a lodging tax; â€¢ Consider other options for improving the Town's fulfillment program as applicable. E 2 L- (0 E.1 Â¢=6 E :2 i a 23 m u.1 ~ E f > 2 0 LU04 g 000 92 <C U) & ki @E# CIO f EN f *Z E =23 0 4 G 5- 1 E *81 f MONTH 1996 1997 % nge 1998 %C e 1999 % 2001 % ange 2002 %Change 2003 %Change Prev. Year January 162,775 173,414 6.54% 221,731 27.86% 219,615 -0.95% 253,113 15.25% 274,452 8.40% 246,462 -10.20% 244,444 -0.82% 172,433 214,301 24.28% 216,038 0.81% 246,150 13.94% 251,076 2.00% 291,508 16.10% 260,415 -10.67% 243,192 -6.61% March 224,965 227,601 1.17% 272,203 19.60% 282,663 3.84% 233,275 -17.47% 331,425 42.07% 301,480 -9.04% 294,622 -2.27% 194,650 205,841 5.75% 264,186 28.34% 256,815 -2.79% 329,263 28.21% 291,313 -11.53% 308,495 5.90% 289,585 -6.13% 341,826 362,036 5.91% 374,411 3.42% 412,874 10.27% 452,373 9.57% 410,545 -9.25% 438,016 6.70% 432,022 -1.37% 569,949 580,200 1.80% 649,522 11.95% 667,229 2.73% 687,192 2.99% 734,863 6.94% 751,262 2.23% 716,004 -4.69% %,2.â‚¬- %96. P %to'17 %6ts %99.. %9FEL %ZZ-* 699'6LZ'Z ELS'800'9 09â‚¬'09 L,9 991.'L36'9 Â»0'6Z9'9 Z8Â£'Â£9â‚¬'g LGE'292't, 929' L.ZO U, 2 - =(9.0-13(11 135001 QJ+ 743,048 785,123 5.66% 855,485 8.96% 886,921 3.67% 896,173 1.04% 942,029 5.12% 929,786 -1.30% August 764,138 815,371 6.70% 788,676 -3.27% 798,749 1.28% 854,412 6.97% 844,027 -1.21% 952,370 12.84% September 568,330 553,988 -2.52% 675,415 21.92% 738,133 9.29% 789,288 6.93% 850,640 7.75% 744,277 -12.51% October 312,915 315,578 0.85% 470,937 49.23% 491,217 4.31% 495,365 0.84% 445,700 -10.03% 416,253 -6.61% November 240,885 264,411 9.77% 280,187 5.97% 294,659 5.17% 307,340 4.30% 384,270 25.03% 315,208 -17.97% December 275,712 289,387 4.96% 314,591 8.71% 334,019 6.18% 372,285 11.46% 359,578 -3.41% 374,489 4.15% TOWN OF ESTES PARK a-liA