The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 2003-01-144, Le /1 U Prepared 01/08/03 4 The Miesion of the Town of Estes Fait le to plan and provide reliable, hi#]-value eervices for our citizens, visitors, and employe e. We take 0reat pride 'eneuri110 and enhancire the quality of life in our community by being good etewards of public // resources and natural eettinG. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, January 14,2003 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated December 10, 2002. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, December 12, 2002, and January 9,2003: 1. Ten-Year Financial Forecast: â€¢ Balance revenue and expenses by year-end 2005 â€¢ Fund capital expenditures from operating revenues through 2010 â€¢ Establish a target for fund balance (excluding inventory) of 25% of operating revenues. This target should be achieved by year 2012. 2. Light and Power Policy Manual - Amending Interest Rate on Deposits. Community Development, January 2,2003: Special Events Dept.: 1. Letter of Understanding with Leslie Williams - 2003 Christmas Parade Coordinator. 2. June Rodeo Series Agreement with Powder River Rodeo, LLC, $48,000. 3. Estes Park Fairgrounds Policy Manual - Amending Section E - Park Use Regulations. 4. Estes Park Housing Authority, November 13, 2002 (acknowledgment only). 5. Estes Valley Planning Commission, December 17, 2002 (acknowledgement only). 6. Resolution #1-03 - Public Place Designation to post notices of meetings. 1 Continued o reverse side 4 Prepared 01/08/03 lA. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing for all Consent Agenda Items. If the Applicant, Public or Town Board wish to speak to any of these consent items, they will be moved to the "Action Item" Section. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: 1. PRELIMINARY & FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS. A. Coldwater Condominiums, Lot 1, Stauffer Subdivision, Hillery Parrack/Applicant. B. Common Point Condominiums, Portion of Lots 42 and 43, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, Common Point Co./Applicant. 2. FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: A. Solitude Condominiums IV, Lot 4, Solitude Subdivision, Crystal Creek Development, Inc./Applicant - Continued from 12/10/02 Town Board Meeting. B. Cedar Ridge Condominiums 111, Lot 4, Beaver Point Third Addition, Cedar Ridge at Estes Park, LLC/Applicant. 3. ACTION ITEMS: Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing (A). The formal public hearing will be conducted as follows: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Public Testimony D. Mayor - Close Public Hearing E. Motion to Approve/Deny A. REVISED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: White Meadow View Place Addition, Amended Development Plan #00-05, Lot 32A of the Amended Plat of Lots 32-35, and Portions of Lots 1, 31 and 37, White Meadow View Place Addition, Don E. Darling/Applicant. Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing (A). The formal public hearing will be conducted as follows: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #1-03 D. Public Testimony E. Mayor - Close Public Hearing F. Motion to Approve/Deny. B. BLOCK 5 TEXT AMENDMENTS to the Estes Valley Development Code - Continued from 12/10/02 - Action. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2003/2004 ELECTRIC RATE INCREASE: Mayor Baudek: Open the Public Hearing (A). The formal public hearing will be conducted as follows: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #2-03 D. Public Testimony/Correspondence 2 L - N' Prepared 01/08/03 E. Mayor - Close Public Hearing F. Motion to Approve/Deny. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: NEW HOTEL & RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FILED BY JOSH HENDERSON, dba THE REDSTONE RESTAURANT, 225 W. RIVERSIDE DRIVE: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Town Clerk - Present Application C. Applicant - Introduction & comment D. Opposition/Rebuttal - If any E. Mayor - Questions/Close Public Hearing F. "Finding" comments & Motion to Approve/Deny. 3. RE-APPOINTMENT - ESTES PARK BUILDING AUTHORITY. Re- appointment of Rich Widmer and Pete Brandjord, 3-yr. terms, expiring 1/01/06. 4. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. 5. ADJOURN. NOTE: The Town Board reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the agenda was prepared. 3 Continued o reverse side Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, December 10, 2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 1 Oth day of December, 2002. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W. Gillette David Habecker (delayed) Lori Jeffrey-Clark G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: None Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Jeffrey-Clark commented on a recent NLC Conference held in Salt Lake City. Trustee Jeffrey-Clark serves as the District 8 Small Cities Representative, and a sampling of topics discussed included: Home Security funding, health care, education, economy, and term limits. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval oft: 1. Town Board Minutes dated November 26, 2002, and Study Session dated November 20,2002. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, December 5,2002: 1. Habitat for Humanity - Waiver of Building Permit/Plan Check Fees. 4. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, December 3,2002 (acknowledgement only). 5. Estes Valley Planning Commission, November 19, 2002 (acknowledgement only). 6. Estes Park Housing Authority, October 14,2002 (acknowledgement only). It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the consent agenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees - December 10, 2002 - Page 2 Board of Trustees - December 10, 2002 - Page 3 lA. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing for all Consent Agenda Items. Community Development Director Joseph requested Item 3.B. be continued to January 14, 2003 to allow an opportunity to resolve a deck issue. 1. CONSENT ITEMS: 1. AMENDED PLATS: A. Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Country Club Manor Addition, Michael & Coleen Allen/Applicants. 2. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAPS: A. The Lodges at Black Canyon Inn Condominiums, a Portion of Meyer's Addition, James Sloan/Applicant. 3. FINAL CONDOMINIUM MAPS: A. Sunset Ridge, Portions of Lots 6 and 10, Block 10, Town of Estes Park, Roy & Michele Johnson/Applicants. B. Solitude Condominium IV, Lot 4, Solitude Subdivision, Crystal Creek Development, Inc./Applicant. C. Park River West Condominiums, Supplemental Maps V and VI, Lots 1 and 2, Park River West Subdivision, Richard H. Wille Trust/Applicant. There was no testimony, thus it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Newsom) that with the exception of item 3.B. above, the consent items be approved, and it passed unanimously. 3. ACTION ITEMS: Block 4 Text Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code. Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing, and Community Development Dir. Joseph reviewed the Staff Report advising that the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended approval of the following Block 4 Text Amendments: > Separate legal lot definition > Requirement for pre-application conference k Maximum building height > Timeframe for variance applications > Submittal rdquirements for variances > Criminal/civil remedies and enforcement powers. The Town Board initially reviewed these amendments on November 12th, and public comment was received. An updated document referring to Separate Legal Lot Definition--Process, pages 1 ihrough 5 was distributed. Staff specifically reviewed the mechanics of said process. Town Attorney White has reviewed the update, and previous public comment has been considered. Staff would support delaying action on the Block 4 Amendments offering the Town Board an opportunity for additional review. Town Attorney White read Ordinance #18-02. As there was no public testimony, Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing. Following a question and answer period, it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) Ordinance #18-02 be approved. The motion passed 14 the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Gillette, Jeffrey-Clark and Newsom. Those voting "No" Trustees Barker and Doylen. Those "Abstaining" None. Those "Absent" Trustee Habecker. Block 5 Text Amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code - Presentation. Mayor Baudek opened the Public Hearing, and Community Board of Trustees - December 10, 2002 - Page 4 Development Dir. Joseph reviewed the Staff Report, confirming that. this amendment includes proposed highway corridor design standards that implement specific policies that address Community Design, Scenic and environmental quality, and economics. A copy of the Town Board Study Session June 12, 2001 where staff was directed to prepare draft standards, was distributed. The Highway Corridor Overlay District Section was thoroughly reviewed: â€¢ This section shall apply to all non-residential and multi-family development and/or re-development of structures any portion of which is located within 100-feet of State Hwy. 34,36,7 and 66. â€¢ The Commercial Downtown District is exempt. â€¢ This section does not apply to existing structures unless a development plan is required by the EVDC. â€¢ Subsection C.3.h. "Building Color" shall not apply to existing structures unless a change in building color is proposed. Design standards were read aloud, and include: â€¢ Buildings or portions of buildings designed to represent or to replicate the recognizable physical form of a product to be sold, or a form commonly associated with a product to be sold areprohibited. â€¢ Maximum building height shall not exceed 20' above original grade within 30' from highway right-of-way; or 25' above original grade within 35' from highway right-of-way. â€¢ Metal siding shall be prohibited as primary siding material. â€¢ Roofing and exterior wall materials that are highly reflective shall not be allowed. â€¢ Facades that face public streets shall include variation in the wall plane to reduce the apparent bulk and length of long buildings. Prominent projections and/or recesses of at least 4' horizontal offset must occupy at least 20% of the length of the fagade. Building setbacks for projections on arterial streets may be reduced to 15'; the average setback of the street fagade shall be 25'. Building setbacks for projections on non-arterial streets may be reduced to 10'; the average setback of the street fagade shall be 15'. Fagade projections and recesses should be integral parts of the building, and not superficially applied trim, graphics, or paint. â€¢ All sides of a building that face a public street shall be finished with the same materials as the primary fagade. â€¢ Long, uniform, continuous rooflines shall be avoided. Roof surfaces should be broken up with dormers, offsets, and variations in roof height. â€¢ Building color. (Items 1-6). As requested, staff will present favorable photos of metal buildings, and discussion followed on the "Modification from Standards" that allows the EVPC to waive or modify design standards set forth in Section 4.5C in conjunction with a site specific development pan that advances the purpose and intent of this Section. Trustee Habecker joined the Board at 8:05 p.m. Staff confirmed that property owners would be allowed to perpetually re- paint an existing color, and that authority lies with the Planning Commission to waive this standard; there is some allowance for more creative use of color within a basic color theme. Board of Trustees - December 10, 2002 - Page 5 Trustee Barker commented on "maximum building height" and stated, for the record, that he "wants this section deleted, as every property, not just the C-O should be included." Trustee Habecker noted concern with the original grade of the highway, and questioned the direction being proposed on the Text 5 Amendments. Trustee Newsom stated that the standards are an attempt to improve the appearance of the highway corridors. Public testimony was heard from Cherie' Pettyjohn (need less rules, not more; economics and expense to the property owner; creating an undesirable 'position for the Planning Commission (decision-making)). Corey Black/Best Western Silver Saddle (read a letter dated December 10, 2002 executed by Wallace Burke, Owner/Best Western Silver Saddle, noting objection to the highway corridor design standards). There being no further testimony at this time, Mayor Baudek announced that, as scheduled, the Public Hearing will be continued to January 14, 2003 for final action. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET RESOLUTION #37-02. Finance Officer Brandjord read said resolution supplementing the following funds previously discussed at Committee level and recommended for approval: Special Events $ 45,584 Open Space $ 28,046 Building Authority $ 93,450 Water Funds $2,180,000 It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Barker) Resolution #37-02 be adopted, and it passed unanimously. 2. PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR ELK & VEGETATION MANAGEMENT STUDY - PRESENTATION BY ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK REPRESENTATIVES. RMNP Sum. Baker introduced Ryan Monello, Biologist, who briefed the Trustees on the research model for Elk and Vegetation Planning. The proposed Project Agreement for the Elk and Vegetation Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement for the RMNP area includes 8 cooperating agencies, one of which being the Town. Supt. Baker reviewed Project background information, purpose, description of the planning process and products to be generated, the public involvement process, project team, roles and responsibilities. Administrator Widmer clarified the Town's commitment in approving this Agreement. Discussion followed, and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) the Mayor be authorized to execute the Project Agreement, and it passed unanimously. Town representatives on this Project are Town Administrator Widmer, Community Development Director Joseph, and Senior Planner Shirk. Ass't. Supt. Tony Schetzsle briefed the Board on the 2003-2004 Bear Lake Road Reconstruction Project. Mayor Baudek expressed the Board's appreciation for both presentations. 3. APPOINTMENTS. Mayor Baudek presented the following appointments/re- appointments for approval: A. Estes Park Buildina Authoritv - Reappointment of Peggy Lynch, 3-yr. term, expiring 01/08/06. - Board of Trustees - December 10, 2002 - Page 6 B. Museum Advisory Board - Reappointment of Sybil Barnes and Susan Harris, 4-yr. terms, expiring 01/01/07. C. Committee Member Reassignments - David Habecker from the Light & Power Committee to the Public Works Committee (replacing Stephen Gillette), and Stephen Gillette from the Public Works Committee to the Light and Power Committee (replacing David Habecker). The effective date is January 1, 2003. D. Estes Park Public Library Board - Appointment of Sarah Walsh, completing a 4-yr. term previously held by Helen Platt. Term expires 12/31/04. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Habecker) the appointments/re- appointments contained in Items A through D above' be approved, and it passed unanimously. Concluding all action items, Trustee Barker requested anyone affected by the proposed highway corridor regulations be notified about the January 14, 2003 Town Board meeting. Consensus was reached that, while notice is not to be construed as "legal notice", nor as a precedent, staff was directed to notify said property owners. Trustee Habecker advised that he will be submitting amendments for consideration at the next meeting. 4. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Light & Power Committee Meeting. The entire Town Board was encouraged to attend the Light and Power Committee Meeting scheduled Thursday, December 12th at 7:30 a.m. The proposed rate study will be presented. B. RMNP Visitation Report for November - Visitation is down 26% from last year, and year-to-date is down 5.7%. C. Stanley Ave. Sidewalk. Project update; will be very usable; will be great addition. D. Fall River Trail - W. Elkhorn. The first phase of this trail on W. Elkhorn Ave. has commenced and construction will soon continue into Performance Park. E. Performance Park. Phase 1 has been completed. Ph. 2 will begin in March, and this 'phase includes landscaping, and a cover for the pavilion. Drawings/renderings are available in the Big Hom Restaurant. Mayor Baudek noted that due to the upcoming holiday schedule, the Town Board Meeting scheduled December 24,2002 has been cancelled. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. John Baudek, Mayor I , Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, December 12, 2002 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 12th day of December 2002. Committee: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustees Habecker and Newsom Attending: All Also Attending: Trustee Gillette, Town Administrator Widmer, Light & Power Director Matzke, and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent: None Chairman Jeffrey-Clark called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. 2003/2004 ELECTRIC RATE INCREASE - APPROVAL. Max Kiburz/M.E. Kiburz and Associates presented a summary of the electric rate study recently completed and explained the proposed adjusted revenues, expenses, and rate increases in detail. The study recommends changes affecting all rate classes and will be implemented through rate increases effective February 1, 2003 and January 1, 2004. The cost to each individual customer will depend upon the type of service received and monthly consumption. Listed below is a summary of the proposed changes: Off-Peak Winter Summer Customer Energy Energy Demand Demand Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge $/Month $/kWh $/kWh $/kW $/kW Residential Current Available to all residential customers $3.00 $0.06359 and residential with electric heat up to 20,000 kWh annually 2003 Available to all residential customers $4.00 $0.06663 and residential with electric heat up to 25,000 kWh annually 2004 Same $4.00 $0.07203 Residential Demand Current Available to all residential customers $3.00 $0.03085 $7.15 $3.93 over 15,000 kWh annually and residential with electric heat 2003 Available to all residential customers $5.00 $0.03360 $7.15 NA over 15,000 kWh annually and residential with electric heat (September through April) 2004 Same ~ $5.00 $0.03663 $7.89 NA Residential Enerqv Time-of-Dav Current Available to all residential customers $3.00 $0.08000 $0.02550 using energy storage electric space heat under 25,000 kWh on-peak annually ' 2003 Available to all residential customers $5.00 $0.08066 $0.02850 using energy storage electric space heat 2004 Same $5.00 $0.08760 $0.03100 Residential Energy Basic Time-of- Day (NEW) 2003 Available to all residential customers $5.00 $0.07995 $0.06330 (September through April) 2004 Same $5.00 $0.08643 $0.06843 Small Commercial Current Available to all commercial customers $7.25 $0.06892 with demands of 35 kW or less RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light & Power Committee - December 12, 2002 - Page 2 Off-Peak Winter Summer Customer Energy Energy Demand Demand Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge $/Month $/kWh $/kWh $/kW $/kW 2003 Same $7.25 $0.07198 2004 Same $7.25 $0.07517 Small Commercial Enerav Time-of- Current Available to all commercial customers $7.25 $0.08670 $0.02550 using energy storage electric space heat with demands of 35 kW or less 2003 Same $8.25 $0.08777 $0.02850 2004 Same $8.25 $0.09277 $0.03100 Larqe Commercial Current Available to commercial customers NA $0.02959 $9.26 $9.26 with demands exceeding 35 kW 2003 $10.00 $0.03081 $9.52 $9.52 2004 $10.00 $0.03208 $9.92 $9.92 Large Commercial Time-of-Dav Current Available to commercial customers NA $0.02959 $0.02444 $10.70 $10.70 with demands exceeding 35 kW 2003 $12.00 $0.03081 $0.02545 $10.70 $10.70 2004 $12.00 $0.03208 $0.02650 $11.17 $11.17 RMNP Administrative Housing Current Available to Rocky Mountain National $3.00 $0.02475 Park residences which have an alternate source of power available for delivery to the EP electric system 2003 Same $4.00 $0.02593 2004 Same $4.00 $0.02803 RMNP Small Administrative Current Available to Rocky Mountain National $7.25 $0.03558 Park administrative service accounts which have an alternate source of power available for delivery to the Estes Park electric system with demands of 35 kW or less 2003 Same $7.25 $0.03715 2004 Same $7.25 $0.03879 RMNP Larae Administrative Current Available to Rocky Mountain National NA $0.01491 $4.13 $4.13 Park administrative service accounts which have an alternate source of power available for delivery to the Estes Park electric system with demands exceeding 35 kW 2003 Same $10.00 $0.01613 $4.19 $4.19 2004 Same $10.00 $0.01745 $4.55 $4.55 Municipal Rate Current Available for municipal street, park $0.06216 lighting, and buildings 2003 $0.06602 2004 $0.07012 Outdoor Area Lighting Current Available for lighting outdoor private $5.25 areas ) 2003 $6.32 2004 $7.61 Wind Energv Surcharge (NEW) 2003 Available to all residential and $0.02500 commercial customers (PRPA wind surcharge plus $0.001/kWh) 2004 Same $0.02500 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light & Power Committee - December 12, 2002 - Page 3 The 2003/2004 Budgets currently include a revenue increase of $850,000 ($425,000 each year) compared to $906,000 as outlined in the electric rate study prepared by M.E. Kiburz and Associates. Clarification was sought regarding the change and transfer adjustments, cost allocations and differentials, and completion of the 10-year projection. Concluding all discussion, the Committee recommends that the rate changes presented by M.E. Kiburz and Associates be presented for Town Board consideration at the rate hearing to be held January 14, 2003. A summary containing the proposed changes and public hearing information will be mailed to all electric customers and a legal notice will be published. REPORTS. Platte River Power Authority (PRPA). Adoption of the 2003 Budget, a new $40 million bond issue, and a recommendation to proceed with the Windy Gap Firming Project will be addressed at today's PRPA Board meeting. Scheduled maintenance was successfully completed at the Rawhide Plant during a planned outage. Financial Report. The Committee reviewed the October Income Statement and graphs. Project Updates: None. There being no further business, Chairman Jeffrey-Clark adjourned the meeting at 9:25 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 9,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the LIGHT & POWER COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the gth day of January, 2003. Committee: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustees Gillette and Newsom Attending: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark and Trustee Gillette Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Light and Power Director Matzke, Town Attorney White, Finance Officer Brandjord, Town Clerk O'Connor Absent: Trustee Newsom Chairman Jeffrey-Clark called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. TEN-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST - PRESENTATION. The Committee reviewed a 10-Year Financial Forecast (long-term planning tool) as prepared by Max Kiburz/Kiburz & Associates (Rate Consultant). In summary, Mr. Kiburz stated that the forecast was based on the following assumptions: â€¢ Growth in electric sales is forecast by growing the number of customers in each rate class; average use/customer is assumed to remain constant. â€¢ Rate increases recommended by the 2002 Electric Rate Study will be implemented in 2003 and 2004. â€¢ PRPA's wholesale rate will increase by 4% beginning in 2004. â€¢ Operation and maintenance expenses are expected to increase 2%/yr. â€¢ Excluding large capital projects recommended by the Long Range Plan, capital expenses are forecast based upon historical trends. Graphs for financial detail, sales projections, revenues, operating expenses, PRPA purchased power costs, capital improvements and interest income were presented. In summary, the financial forecast indicates that a rate study update should be performed during 2004 to facilitate a rate recommendation for early 2005. Staff is recommending the following financial goals be adopted: 1. Balance revenue and expenses by year end 2005. 2. Fund capital expenditures from operating revenues through 2010. 3. Establish a target for fund balance (excluding inventory) of 25% of operating revenues. This target should be achieved by year 2012. Assistant Town Administrator Repola reported that Mr. Kiburz has provided a computer program that will allow staff to perform theoretical exercises that will in turn assist staff in updating the financial forecast model every year. Discussion followed on a rate increase v. an added-on surcharge, and staffs assurance that any future rate increases could be spread-out over a period of time in lieu of a substantial one-time increase. The Committee requested staff comment on this item during the public hearing scheduled January 14*. The Committee recommends approval of the three financial goals as specified above, and Light and Power staff, Mr. Kirbuz, etal received kudos in responding to and working on this project. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee - January 9,2003 - Page 2 OPERATION OF CABLE PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNEL 39 - DISCUSSION. Town Administrator Widmer provided background information *on the franchise agreement between Charter Communications and the Town. In summary, the agreement provides that the cable operator must provide certain hours of community programming. Traditionally, this service has been provided by Nick Molle Productions/Channel 8. The Town has been approached by Curt & Cathy Gunther/Airbits, on the possibility of operating Ch. 39 (a public access channel) as a community television station. Town Attorney White reviewed a 1993-94 lawsuit where a citizen sued Charter Communications and the Town for public access. The suit was settled with Charter agreeing to provide public access for 2-hrs./week, Monday-Friday on Channel 39. The Town Board adopted Resolution 15-94 approving the Settlement Agreement and conditions of operating Channel 39 for public access. In Attorney White's opinion, the Town would have an opportunity under the Agreement to proceed. Ms. Gunther reported that Charter is in favor of their concept: "a 24-hr., local, daily, changing programming", that could include daily news, and information/involvement from the schools, senior citizens, etc. Administrator Widmer suggested that it would be in everyone's bdst interest to consider an RFP process. The Committee recommends staff proceed in preparing an RFP to lease Channel 39 for community and public access. Trustee Gillette departed the meeting at 8:40 a.m. POLICY MANUAL AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO INTEREST RATE ON ELECTRIC DEPOSITS - APPROVAL. In accordance with the Utility Deposit Policy contained in the Light and Power Department Policy Manual, the Town requires utility deposits for certain residential and commercial customers. Said Policy references the interest rate established by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) as the interest rate to be paid by the Town on utility deposits. PUC has traditionally set the interest rate to be paid on deposits based on the average monthly rate in the secondary market for one-year U.S. Treasury Bills. The Federal Reserve no longer reports on the secondary market for one-year Treasury Bills and the PUC has not established a new standard, and are continuing to use the 2002 rate of 4.32% until a rulemaking process can be completed. The current interest rate earned by the Town for short-term investments is 1.85%; the current 2-yr. Treasury Bill rate is 1.7%. Based on customer deposits of approximately $150,000, the recommended change will reduce interest paid on deposits in 2003 by approximately $4,000. Staff is recommending the Policy be amended to read as follows: Electric Utility Deposit Policy, Paraaraph (d): All cash deposits retained by the Town will accrue interest at the rate set by the Town's Finance Officer. The rate will be adjusted as of January 1 St of each year to reflect the current market rate earned on Town investments. The 2-year Treasury Bill rate will be used as a benchmark. Accrued interest will be disbursed when the deposit is refunded to the customer. Attorney White confirmed that the Town would not be placed in jeopardy as long as both inside and outside customers are treated in the same manner. The Committee recommends approval of the Policy Manual amendment as presented. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee - January 9,2003 - Page 3 OWNERSHIP OF DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES - DISCUSSION. The Committee reviewed a summary of the ownership of the following distribution system facilities: â€¢ Substation Facilities. Under the Wholesale Power Contract with PRPA, the Town is to furnish the substation site and improvements, including grading, surfacing, access road, fencing, control building, and AC and DC service. Both of the Town's substations are located on BOR property under a Special Use Permit. PRPA is to install, own, and maintain switching and protective equipment of adequate design and sufficient capacity to deliver service to the Town's system at 115,000 volts. The Town is to install, own, and maintain the necessary substation equipment to take delivery of this service. â€¢ Distribution Facilities. The Town owns all distribution lines within its service area. The service area is certified by the PUC, and distribution lines are located in public rights-of-way or easements. â€¢ Service Facilities. Ownership of service facilities is detailed in the Light and Power Policy Manual. New customers pay all costs to extend the town's distribution system to the customer's point of service. In general, the Town installs, owns and maintains all transformers required to deliver service at the standard secondary voltages. Service facilities are owned and maintained by the Town up to the point of service. There ak situhtions (when a transformer is located on private property and serves only a single customer) where ownership of the transformer could be transferred to the property owner. This would reduce the Town's plant investment if implemented on a large scale. Customers would also be exposed to potentially prohibitive repair or replacement costs and may not necessarily eliminate the Town's exposure to nuisance lawsuits. Attorney White provided background information on the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act as it relates to a current lawsuit where the Town was sued when a person tripped on a manhole that was approximately 4" above the ground. The manhole is located between two back porches (condominiums) outside the public way. Pursuant to this lawsuit, Attorney White stressed that the Town should be cognizant of potential similar situations when building new facilities. BIG THOMPSON THREE-PHASE CONVERSION PROJECT - CHANGE ORDER PRESENTATION FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. The Department is in the process of closing-out the Big Thompson .Three-Phase Project. A punch list of work required to complete the project has been developed and staff expects to have a cost estimate from Hamlin Electric within the week. Qwest is requesting many items and they should be held responsible for funding same. The original contract amount for this project (and Baldpate-Big Owl Three-Phase Project) was $758,936. A previous change order request for the Baldpate-Big Owl Project was approved in November, 2002, thus the contract was amended to $779,321 for both projects. The 2002 Budget amount for both projects was $1,040,000. Upon receiving an agreeable proposal from Hamlin, staff will proceed with completion of the project. If a commitment from Qwest is obtained, the Department would hire Hamlin and bill Qwest-all within limitations of the budget. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee - January 9,2003 - Page 4 TRENCHING CONTRACT - APPROVAL. Two small underground projects (Stanley Heights relocation of approximately 450' of overhead single-phase primary underground and the Dry Gulch relocation of approximately 570' of existing direct-bury primary line and conduit installation) were bid with the following results: TA Enterprises $ 9,238 Duell Excavating $17,680 Director Matzke explained the unusual circumstances of the Stanley Heights relocation where a customer paid for underground service (perhaps in the 1960's). The customer believes that the Town constructed an overhead line across the property owner's site to serve a neighbor. Discussion followed on precedence-setting policy, with the Committee recommending the request for the Stanley Heights portion of this project be denied at this time, proceeding with the Dry Gulch portion in the amount of $4,979.50. REPORTS. Platte River Power Authority. No report at this time. Financial Report. The Committee reviewed the November Income Statement and associated graphs. Discussion followed on the delay between financial reporting and the Committee meeting schedule, with Finance Officer Brandjord and Light and Power Director Matzke working on improving the financial reporting method or moving the Committee meeting to accommodate the financial report. Project Updates. Personnel: two employees retired in December - Ron Hersh and Ed Dragon. Todd Steichen has been named Interim Line Supt. and Rick Emerson was named Interim Crew Chief. The Line Supt. position has been advertised nationally, however, in-house employees may apply as well. A final selection should be made by the end of March, and a former journeyman lineman has been re-hired and he will begin work January 20th. Administrator Widmer noted that the line crew is moving forward With a positive attitude, and workspace improvements are being made. The decorative light replacements have been ordered, and a savings of approximately $400/fixture hasbeen established. The first installation scheduled at Performance Park (15), and Chairman Jeffrey-Clark suggested a ribbon- cutting event be scheduled honoring the Team's efforts on this project. The Electric Rate hearing is scheduled 1/14/03, and staff has received a limited number of telephone calls. Approximately 25-50 emergency beacon lights have been sold thus far. There being no further business, Chairman Jeffrey-Clark adjourned the meeting at 9:34 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, January 2,2003 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 2nd day of January 2003. Committee: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Barker and Habecker Attending: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Barker and Habecker (delayed) Absent None Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Directors Hinze, Joseph, Marsh, and Pickering, and Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. SPECIAL EVENTS. A. Director Hinze presented the following standard agreements and requested they be favorably recommended for approval: Â» Christmas Parade, November 28,2003. ~ June Rodeo Series, June 2-25,2003. The Committee recommends approval of the Agreements as presented. B. Policy Manual - Park Use Permit Changes. Director Hinze presented the following Park Use Permit additions/changes and requested they be favorably recommended for approval: - Addition: Definition of Activity - any form of organized activity lasting less than 2 hours. - Addition: Definition of Event - any form of organized activity lasting longer than 2 hours. - , Change: A Park Use Permit shall be required for all activities/events held in Bond Park, Riverside Plaza, Tregent Park and Performance Park and may be required for other Town properties. - Change: All trash shall be removed and properly disposed of by the permittee on a continuous basis during event/activity, at the end of each day and at the conclusion of activity/event, including all fixed and temporary trash receptacles. Failure to do so will incur costs for the permittee totaling $100.00 plus trash removal expenses. - Addition: Literature Distribution - If literature is handed out to public during an activity/event, the permittee is required to pick up all trash within a three- block radius of the event/activity. - Change:' Damages incurred to the Town shall be the responsibility of the permittee. - Addition: Special Requirement for Bond Park: Refer to attached Event Organizer Regulations for specific Bond Park requirements. No new events will be given use of the park on holiday weekends or summer tourist season without Community Development Committee and Town Board approval. The Committee recommends approval of the Park Use Regulations as presented. C. Event Critique. Â» 2002 Christmas Parade. Attendance was excellent due to fair weather in Estes Park and the Front Range. A total of 7 new floats were created this year and 17 were refurbished from 2001. Merchants reported good sales on Friday and Saturday and daytime activities continue to be successful. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - January 2,2003 - Page 2 Director Hinze briefed the Committee on items discussed at the recent Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association (PRCA) National Convention and presented an article published in Hobby Farms regarding the Estes Park Wool Market. ADVERTISING. Manager Marsh reported that total requests for information are up 12.5%, e-mailed requests are up 4.55%, 800 calls are down 14.47%, and advertising responses are up 7.06%. Current Projects include: participation in the Colorado Tourism Office/PRACO co-op advertising program, the President's Weekend/Valentine's Day Front Range Daily St Newspape'r insert, 1 Quarter television schedules on Channel 4 and 9, Snowshoe Series Advertisements in the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News, the Regional Grant Program, and the Ad Committee's internal review of the marketing program audit conducted in the summer of 2002.' Trustee Habecker arrived at 8:32 a.m. and remained until the meeting concluded. CONFERENCE CENTER. Director Pickering reported on 1999-2002 hotel occupancies, average hotel rates, 2002 visitor counts and occupancies and briefed the Committee on 2003 legislative efforts planned to maintain statewide tourism funding. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. A. Outdoor Display Discussion. At the November 26th Town Board meeting, proposed outdoor display regulations were referred to the Community Development Committee for further discussion. Director Joseph presented the proposed regulations presented at the Town Board meeting and standards from Mackinaw Island and the City of Mendocino for review. Areas discussed include: percentage formulas, size/area limitations, highway corridor regulations, marketing strategies, and ' the possible need for further' regulations. Concerns were expressed regarding subjective language, the lack of a comprehensive solution, creation of additional regulations, and the complexity of the issue; therefore, it was recommended this item be suspended and that no further action regarding outdoor displays be taken at this time. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 9:58 a.m. Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC, Deputy Town Clerk Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) Board Meeting Date: November 13,2002 Members Present: Eric Blackhurst, Sue Doylen, Jack Dinsmoor, Lee Kundtz, Members Absent: Karla Porter Staff Present: Rita Kurelja, Sam Betters, Rich Ekwall, Frank Lans Others Present: Joe Wise, Kristie Charles Guests: The November 13th meeting o f the Estes Park Housing Authority was called to order by Sue Doylen, Chairperson, at 8:35 a.m. in Room 203 ofthe Estes Park Municipal Building. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Board reviewed the October 9th meeting minutes. Sue Doylen asked if anyone had any comments, questions or changes to the October 9th minutes. Corrections: correct spelling of Lee's name and change Steve Lans name to Steve Tindel. Lee moved to approve the October 9th meeting minutes with corrections; Eric seconded. A vote was called and the motion to approve the October 9th meeting minutes passed. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORTS - Financial statements were reviewed for October 2002. Jack questioned the complexity of the financial statements. It was suggested that there be a short narrative on what happened financially during the month. Sam will speak to Sharlet about. The request for *2 new accounts was presented. Accounting was asking for 1 new account for each Talon's Pointe and Vista Ridge. Each would be funded from the construction loan and would handle any mid-draw requests that could not wait for the draw cycle. Both accounts would have the following signers: Sue Doylen, Rita Kurelja and HACOL signers. In the absence of resolutions it was moved and seconded to give Chairperson Doylen permission to sign the resolutions, approving the two new accounts and change of signers, A vote was called and the motjon to approve was passed. Budget- Sam reported on the Town of Estes Park Budget for Fiscal years 2003 and 2004. The original request included 30 M payment water and sewer taps and Rita's position at full time. The Town theft reduced this request. Sam then proposed that the tap fees be reduced to 15 in 2003 and 16 in 2004 to take care of all 31 Affordable units at Vista Ridge. This actually reduced the request and the Town approved. It was also agreed that i f legal fees exceed 10 thousand in a year the Housing Authority would pay the extra. Jack moved to accept the revised budge and Eric seconded. A vote was called and the motion to approve was passed. EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page I DEVELOPMENT UPDATES - Cleave Street - One available apartment. Financial and maintenance issues discussed. Talon's Pointe Apartments- Rich reported that all foundations but 1 were poured. All slabs were poured. Framing was progressing. There would be a change order to reflect additional blasting that would need to be accomplished. There is a construction meeting every other Wednesday and all Board members are invited to atiend. Rich then explained the Talon's Pointe Development Cost financial statement. Investor Proposals- Sam presented the various proposals for the Tax Credit Investors on Talon's Pointe and summary ofprojected financing. Sam discussed the scope ofthe deal in terms of the tax crediti Still in question is the amount to be paid by the Investor. Discussion only on the John Hancock and USB proposals and the two were compared both structurally and financially. Motion was made (by Jack) to allow Sam to move forward with negotiations with John Hancock on behalf of the EPHA. Seconded by Eric. Vote was called for and motion was approved. Will not be signed until there is a lock on permknent financing, hopefully with CHFA. Sue Doylen discussed the Development fee split. Normally it would be 80-20 with EPHA getting 80. Due to the fact that EPHA is a new organization and does not have much in the way of equity the Investors were requiring a Guarantor. The Town was unable to do it due to the Tabor Amendment. The HACOL board agreed to do this and very generously agredd to a 50/50 split on the Development fee. The deal will now have 2 General Partners. Investors requested HACOL be the Property Managers. Lease up: Jack asked that the Board establish waiting list policies on Talons Pointe and Vista Ridge. Will do presentations and on both projects when 'all' is known. First df February goal for gathering information on the projects. Rita will put together information/ brochure on the project (Talon's Pointe) including floor plans, rent rates, targeted income levels etc. Will create the ability to apply for all projects with one application. Preference will be given to individuals who work in Estes Park and Live in School district. Rita will work on putting together a Public Awareness Power Point Campaign. Include pictures. Schedule with Civic clubs. Jack will head up Public Relations committee. Vista Ridge- Rita reported on the status on the Condominium documents. Will be creating a second Deed of Trust for the difference between appraised Value and Sales price. Meeting With Greg White and the Board members to go over. COMMITTEE REPORTS Communications to Report - none to report. REPORTS UPDATES & OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Section 8- will be moving the administration of the section 8 program up to Estes Park over the next several months. Currently it is in Loveland. EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page 2 Holiday Party - Lee volunteer his house. Friday the 6th of December. Potluck. Rita will organize food. Eric moved to approve minutes from the Executive Session of October 13th. Seconded. Vote called for and the motion passed. Sue asked for a motion to adjourn. Lee moved and Eric seconded. Motion to adjourn at 10:40 passes. ADJOURN Respectfully submitted, Rita Kurelja Estes Park Housing Authority Program Manager EPHA Board Meeting Minutes Page 3 D""ORD PUBLI//ING /O. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting of the Estes Valley Planning Commission December 17, 2002,1:30 p.m. Board Room, Estes Park Municipal Building Commission: Chair Cherie Petlyjohn, Commissioners Wendell Amos, Bill Horton, Joyce Kitchen, Edward Pohl, Richard Homeier, and Dominick Taddonio Attending: Chair Pettyjohn, Commissioners Horton, Pohl, Homeier, and Taddonio Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Joseph, Planner Shirk, Planner Chilcott, Town Board Liaison Habecker and Recording Secretary Williamson Absent: Commissioner Amos and Kitchen Chair Pettyjohn called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. Estes Valley Planning Commission Minutes dated November 19, 2002. b. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINUM MAP, GOLDWATER CONDOMINIUMS, LOT 1, STAUFFER SUBDIVISION, 665 & 685 Riverside Drive, Applicant: Hillery Parrack - Condominiumize 2 units. Conditions of Approval: 1. Review and approval of the condominium declarations by Town Attorney White. c. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, PORTION OF SEC 1 & 2, T4N, R73W, 2550 S. St. Vrain Avenue, Applicant: Frank James & Mary Elena Willets - Adjust internal lot line. Condtions of Approval: 1. Compliance with Town Attorney White's memo dated November 26,2002. It was moved and seconded (HomeiedPohl) that the Consent Agenda be accepted and it passed unanimously with two absent. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 3. PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, COMMON POINT CONDOMINIUMS, PORTION OF LOTS 42 & 43, LITTLE PROSPECT MOUNTAIN ADDITION, 131 Stanley Avenue, Applicant: Common Point Company. Planner Chilcott reviewed the staff report. This is a preliminary condominium map application to create four condominium units in the "0" Office zoning district. The existing uses are permitted in this zoning district. Common Point Company is the declarant and the name of the common intetest community to be created is Common Point Professional Condominiums. Declaration Article VI11 - Restrictions on Use, Alienation and Occupancy, restricts the use of each unit to light commercial and office use only. The applicant has not reserved the right to build additional units or withdraw property from the Association. This condominium map consists of two lots/parcels described on two separate deeds in 1977. Staff has not determined if these are two separate lots. If they are two separate lots, the applicant should combine the two lots into one. If the parcels were not legally subdivided, the map should combine them. The existing uses are permitted in this zoning district. The building does not conform to the fifteen-foot side and rear setback. The site does not conform to the fifty percent impervious coverage requirement. If there is one lot, it is nonconforming as to the curb cut requirements. Staff has not reviewed the plan for conformance with all zoning district requirements, such as floor area ratio. Approval of this plat does not make existing nonconformities conforming. Amy Plummer of Van Horn Engineering was present to represent the applicant. She stated the applicant has no object to the conditions of approval. Public Comment: None. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - December 17, 2002 Page z It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Taddonio) to recommend approval to the Town Board of Trustees of the Preliminary Condominium Map, Lots 42 & 43, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, 131 Stanley Avenue with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 1. The two lots/parceIs shall be combined into one lot with this condominium map. 2. The name in the Declaration is Common Point Professional Condominiums and the title of the map and name in the dedication is "Common Point Condominiums.7 The two names shall be the same. 3. The Declaration refers to unit numbers and the map has unit letters. The two shall be the same. 4. Prior to recording the final condominium map the applicant shall submit an attorney's certificate stating that the map and declaration complies with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (Â§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN02-21, BIGHORN AT SPRUCE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, A PORTIONOF LOTS 22 & 12, BLOCK 10, 2ND AMENDED PLAT, TOWN OF ESTES PARK, 221 Bighorn Drive, Applicant: David & Susan Habecker Planner Shirk reviewed the staff report. This is a request to build five residential condominium units (two duplexes, one single) at the comer of Big Horn and Spruce. A single-family residence currently exists at the site, and is planned to remain totaling six units. This application is forthe development plan only, and a future condominium map will need to be filed for review and approval prior to individual dale. The site contains 1.03 acres, and is zoned "RM" Multi-Family. The site, and neighborhood, has been zoned as such since at least 1974. Based on the lot size, this site could be developed with up to eight residential units. This proposal includes the provision of sidewalks, will pave the existing driveway, contain landscaping, comply with zoning requirements, and retain additional storm water runoff. This proposal meets all applicable zoning and general development standards set forth in the Estes Valley Development Code. This proposal also complies with setbacks, however due to the location of certain buildings, setback certificates will be required. A petition containing signatures from 18 neighborhood residences has been submitted to Community Development, along with a letter outlining specific concerns including character of the neighborhood, drainage, and traffic. David Habecker stated that he has no problem with the conditions of approval. He stated this property has been zoned "RM" since 1974. Public Comment: Diane Raybum, 221 Spruce Drive, has concerns regarding the increase in traffic on both Spruce and Big Hom. She stated Bighorn and Spruce Drive are used to get around Elkhorn during the summer months. Greg Sievers from Public Works stated that the average daily trip count on Bighorn has been documented at 1050 trips. This project would increase the traffic by 5 percent. Public Works does not believe this is a significant increase. Tom Salow, 270 Big Horn Drive, stated that the speed limit is not enforced on Big Horn Drive. He feels that additional dwellings will cause additional traffic problems. Bill Grove, 260 Big Horn Drive, also stated that traffic has tripled in the past few years and that the speed limit is excedded. He feels that the addition of new dwellings will increase the traffic problems. Sue Ashby, 220 Bighorn Drive, stated that it was unclear how much time would be allotted for the construction of the project. She also stated that the oldest tree in the Estes Park Municipality is near the proposed building C. She is concerned what affect construction could have on the tree. Mr. Habecker stated that he will start building within 3 years and that the construction phase will depend on the market. He stated that he has always tried to save trees by building around them. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - December 17, 2002 Page 3 Â· It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Homeier) to approve of the Development Plan 02-21, Bighorn at Spruce Condominium Development, a portion of Lots 22 & 12, Block 10, 2nd Amended Plat, Town of Ested Park, 221 Bighorn Drive with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 1. Submittal of a revised site plan delineating all proposed outdoor parking spaces, replacing Town of Estes Park Comm. Dev. Director" with "Estes Valley Planning Commission, Cherie Pettyjohn, Chair", compliance with Public Works Director Linnane's comments dated December 6,2002, and compliance with Estes Park Sanitation Districts memo dated December 11, 2002. 2. Before issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit construction drawings that include specific details regarding grading, site drainage, building height, erosion control (including increased silt fence length along southern boundary), tree and vegetation protection, and any other information necessary to verify compliance with the approved development plan. 3. Setback certificates prepared by a registered land surveyor shall be presented to the building official at the footing foundation inspection for the following buildings: the western portion of building "D", the western deck of building "B", and the northern corner and southern deck of building "C". 5. ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISIONS Director Joseph reviewed the proposed code amendments - Accessory Uses (Including Home Occupations) and Accessory Structures, Employee Housing Including Downtown and Square Footage Allowed, and Density Bonus for Attainable Housing. Public Comment: Accessory Uses: John Spooner was present to represent the car club. He gave a brief history of the car clubs interest and involvement with the current code revisions. He stated that the car club does not feel it is necessary to make a distinct between garages and other accessory structures detached or attached. The car club is concerned about the cumulative total square footage allowed for garages. Director Joseph advised that by making a distinction between garages and accessory structures and placing a limit on the number of garages, the net affect will be fewer accessory structures per neighborhood. He feels the vast majority of building permits for accessory structures will be for garages. He stated that an accessory use should be incidental to the principal use, and if an accessory structure is more than 50 percent of the principle use it would not be considered incidental. Commissioner Taddonio is concerned about retaining the character of the residential neighborhoods. He feels that there is a difference between garages that house the family vehicles versus a large accessory structure for storage. He believes such gross structures do not belong in a residential neighborhood. Alma Hicks, 501 Big Horn, stated that she would prefer cars be stored inside a garage. She feels the accessory building should be limited in size and not distinguish the use of the building. Commissioner Horton stated that the lot size is more important than the size of the house. Director Joseph agrees with that statement when discussing larger lots; however smaller lots would be impacted visually by large accessory structures. Planner Chilcott stated that the intent is to limit the size of an accessory structure on smaller lots so that the accessory use would not dominate the principle use. Employee Housing Rod Ault, 511 W. Elkhorn, stated the only way he will be able to afford his own property is to have his business and home on the same property. He feels the 800 square feet per dwelling currently allowed is small for a family. - BMAOFOROPUBLISHING.0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Valley Planning Commission - December 17, 2002 - Page 4 Commissioner Horton questioned if Mr. Ault has had difficulty finding employee housing. Mr. Ault stated that he was unable to hire seasonal employees because he did not have housing available for them. Director Joseph stated you could let the property owner decided how to allocate the square footage within the 125 percent of the floor area ratio cap. The property owner could then decide how to allocate the space per unit instead of setting a square footage limit. Outdoor Display Director Joseph stated that the Town Board has directed the Community Development Committee to look into the outdoor display language within the sign code. The Town Board has asking the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to remove the outdoor display language from Ordinance 17-02. It was moved and seconded (Homeier/Horton) to recommend repeal ofthe outdoordisplay language from Ordinance 17-02 until such time that revised language is brought forward by the Community Development Committee, and it passed unanimously with two absent. 6. REPORTS Attorney Greg White reviewed the new Public Notice Policy. He stated if a quorum of Planning Commissioners attends a public meeting then a notice heeds to be posted 24 hours before the meeting. He advised the Commissioners to inform the Community Development Department if they plan to attend any public meeting. Planner Shirk gave a brief review of the Development Plan for Mt. View Townhomes currently being reviewed by staff. He stated there have been some neighborhood concerns. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned at 4:42 p.m. Cherie Pettyjohn, Chair ; Jacquelyn Williamsori Recording Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 1-03 WHEREAS, Section 26-6-402(2)(c) of the "Colorado Sunshine Act of 1972" as amended, requires a municipality to designate a public place to post notices of its meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: 1. That the lobby area immediately adjacent to the Administrative Offices in the Estes Park Municipal Building, located at 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado, is hereby designated as the Public Place for Posting Notices of Town Meetings. DATED this day of ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Community Development - Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Robert Joseph, ASLA, Director Date: January 6,2003 Subject: Coldwater Condominiums Preliminary and Final Condominium Map Background. Community Development Staff approved a four-unit residential development plan for 625 Riverside drive in February 2002. As part of that development plan review, Staff found the proposal complied with all adequate public facility requirements established with Â· ~ the Estes Valley Development Code. / i. I ./ This submitted preliminary 6/gy condominium map complies with the ~ River j32*'dj > ~ / Brynwood on the ~ approved development plan, as well Ot. as all applicable subdivision design .,r-<#----- standards. This is also a review for "*009**c~-*fibt ~_ the final condominium map for the two Big Ibo~p,on western units (units 3 and 4). The Timbella~odge 1 - EVPC voted unanimous conditional approval at their regularly scheduled m December public hearing. 807 Budget. N/A Action. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Preliminary and Final Condominium Maps, CONDITIONAL TO review and approval of condominium declarations by Town Attorney White. Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 and Bob Joseph, Director Date: January 8,2003 Subject: Common Point Preliminary and Final Condominium Map Background. The applicant, Common Point Company, Roger M. Thorpe, President, has submitted a preliminary and final condominium map for Common Point Condominiums. This map will condominiumize four existing units in the "0" Office zoning district. The existing uses are conforming office uses. The Estes Valley Planning Commission recommended conditional approval of the preliminary map at the December 17,2002 meeting. Budget. None. Location Map for Common Point Condominiums N Action. jill\ 0,,~,200 16,800 22,400 Approval of Common Point -----------Feet Condominiums preliminary and final ,_tfL?7~~?~~Ej_ - ~ PÂ°ver plantand~i~Stati~n~~ "A" Zoning Digrid | 'CO" Zoning Distrid condominium maps with the conditions recommended by the Estes Valley Li-L Â£-71 19 -7 1 Planning Commission. A l Stanley Ave. ~ j -:qy-----, L.f----'.. 6 \ L---1 Highâ€¢ey 36 Undeveloped 7 1. The two lots/parcels shall be /X.Ld Highway 7 combined into one lot with this condominium map Iii _LUA EK;;; ~| ~~~ center E 2" Zoning D istrid I ~ Unclemloped ti-\ Yrr-[-f AJ~mmon~ D"Zoning District Â£\ 2. The name in the Declaration is Common Point Professional Condominiums and the title of r[ /1/1,/#26\ 1 - - the map and name in the dedication is "Common Point Condominiums." The two names shall be the same. 3. The Declaration refers to unit numbers and the map has unit letters. The two shall be the same. 4. Prior to recording the final condominium map the applicant shall submit an attorney's certificate stating that the map and declaration complies with the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (Â§38-33.3-101 et seq. C.R.S.). â€¢Page 2 Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 and Bob Joseph, Director Date: January 9,2003 Subject: Final Condominium Map for Lots 4, Solitude Subdivision Background. This is a final condominium map application to condominiumize two units on Lot 4. The r site is located at 1855 Sketch Box Lane, in the Town of Estes Park, and is owned by Ronald J. Gordon. The lot is zoned "A" Accommodations Highway Corridor and the use is accommodations. The Town Board conditionally approved the preliminary condominium map for Lot 4 on May 14, 2002. The final condominium map was on the December 10, 2002 Town Board agenda, but was removed because the the applicant did not submit a deck permit and remodel the deck to comply the dimensions shown on the condominium map. Location Map Budget. None. --1-1 r bublic Open Space-~~ 'I Action. / Approval of the final condominium map for Sch 001 Lot 4, Solitude Subdivision with the following Fish Creek Roa \ -600 Fish Creek Road conditions: compliance with the Town Board conditions of approval for the preliminary i Brodie Avenne condominium map; compliance with Greg _ii f- White's comments in his November 26, . 2002 memo; the recorded shared parking ===2------2--'IL agreement for Lot 4 and 5 shall be + submitted, and revised development plan mylars for Lots 4 and 5 shall be submitted. Community Development Depaament Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Robert Joseph, ASIA, Director Date: January 6,2003 Subject: Cedar Ridge Final Condominium Map, Units 3 and 4 Background. In October 2002, the ~'\ \1 \ / //~ Town Board approved the preliminary ~~___~ - - condominium map for this portion of \61 Cedar Ridge conditional to compliance with Public Works comment "all drainage ~ A - Crl facilities outside of the ROW shall be _ - :ki~:e~Â· maintained by the Condo Association. < 1 This should be noted on the map." This 0 * c CD CA- condition has been satisfied. This final condominium map complies with the .144 approved preliminary map. 90\ Budget. N/A GO , Action. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Condominium Map, CONDITOINAL TO compliance with Town Attorney White's memo dated January 3, 2003. The applicant is agreeable to this condition. Town of Estes Park Community Development Department Memo To: Honorable Mayor Baudek Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer From: Alison Chilcott, Planner 11 and Bob Joseph, Director Date: January 8,2003 Subject: JANCO Properties Revised Development Agreement and Improvement Guarantee Waiver Background. Development Agreement The applicant has requested a revision to the development agreement, Reception #0099088911, which became effective April 6, 1999 between the Town and JANCO Properties. Provision #7 of this agreement, states "The Owner shall be entitled to construct the relocated units on Lot 32A of the Amended Plat in the configuration and locations set forth on Exhibit C attached hereto." Exhibit C shows three units located near the center of the lot and three units along the southern lot line. The applicant submitted development plan for staff level review, which was conditionally approved on December 19, 2002. This plan shows two units near the center of the lot and four units along the N Locati on Map for 448 Stanley Avenue southern lot line. One of the conditions A A \ 0 240 480 960 1,440 1.920 of approval is that the applicants /V .--.--~ I Feet receive Town Board approval for the 1 111111 111 -\ ry /1 y/,\ revised unit location. r /\ >21 Â» 619 6132~L><*23 "00" Zoning _ Stanley Ave. U- .$- Waiver of /mprovement Guarantee bAL[ :4 T *, 4' 11 -- -4 /\\0 11 i ki -1 J Highwayl Zk>..... for Required Development Plan - ApÂ«J n A -1- ---1 Improvements The applicant has submitted a letter of z tÂ¥4 1--RE \Cce- \ - intent concerning phasing of adequate g 11 L.1-d ij 19Â©~ ~~ r~~~4 public facilities improvements triggered ~ ponderosa Dr. ~--*-4 -1 + U \ Woodstock Dr. by the proposed development and a -- p- -1 r-741 request for a waiver of the - i -1 1, ~' U ' |-<T ~ .RM"Zoning III[ mprovement guarantee for these E "R-2"Zoning ,< I 1 1 1 -1 improvements. Et\ 3- - 1 1"I'.- 1 1 3 11- L ././.../..JI.lull--ILL Staff supports this request, based on the affordable housing. The statement of intent indicates an expected completion time frame for all required improvements of 2 to 4 years. Budget. No new budget impacts. The current agreement remains in effect. Action. Development Agreement Approval of the revised development agreement to allow units to be constructed in the locations shown on the development plan. Waiver of Improvement Guarantee for Required Development Plan Improvements Approval of the improvement guarantee waiver to assist the development of this proposed affordable housing project. â€¢Page 2 ro j STATEMENT OF INTENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF LOT 32A OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 32,33,34,35, AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 31, AND 37 WHITE MEADOW VIEW PLACE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO The proposed project is a multi-family development on Lot 32A of the Amended Plat of lots 32,33, 34. 15, and Portions of Lots 1, 31, and 37, White Meadow View Place Addition to the Town of Esius Park, a Portion of the SW 94 of Section 30, Township 5 North, Range 72 West of the 6th p.M., Larimer County, Colorado. The property is owned by Janco Properties of Estes Park, R.L.L.P. and Herb and Lucy Phelan are lien holders. The development proposes six new single family, affordable units built as duplexes, 5 units with a total living and garage area of 993 s. f. each (4965 s. f. total) and 1 handicap accessible unit with a total area of 1115 s. f. These will be added to 11 existing units in 8 buildings (5734 s.f.) for a total of 17 units in 14 buildings (11,814 s.f.) The proposed total impervious coverage is 20,436 s.f. or 35.6% of total lot area. The property is zoned RM, Multifamily, along with the adjacent property to the east, Lot 33A, and the adjacent property to the northwest and southwest. The property lying to the west is zoned R-2, TWA Family Residential, and all other surrounding properties are zoned CO, Outlying Commercial. Ac.ess will continue to be from Stanley Avenue. The new units will replace the same number of units that were removed from the north side of Stanley Avenue in order to widen the Stanley Avenue R.O.W. at its intersection with Highway 7. Thg will fulfill the agreement between the owners and the Town ofEstes Park regarding a density transfer. The six new units will be completed such that they are available for the rental season of 2003 and will be rented complying with the agreement between the owners and the Town of Estes Park. A master plan for upgrading the existing units on Lot 32A and Lot 33A is in the process of being developed. Tentatively, construction for the next phase will begin in the fall of 2004. Potentially the two lots will be combined to allow a greater flexibility in layout. A quality final project is the intent of the owners. With more utility trenching and heavy equipment expected on the lots, a request is made to delay paving in required areas until after the reconstruction is complete. The areas delineated on the development plan adjacent to proposed units will be paved after the construction of the 6 new units and as weather permits. Note that much ofthe existing drive is already paved. Ar@as shown as existing gravel parking will remain unpaved until the corresponding unit is rebuilt. When the master plan is implemented, the owners propose to fully comply with required town standards. Improvements required along with this development plan which we request be delayed include apn"oximately 470 s.Â£ of paving in front of Units E and F, and a more permanent water diversion structure (such as a surface drain) across the road above the detention basin. Due to the affordable aspect of this project we request a waiver from providing an improvement guarantee totaling approximately $3,350. - ORDINANCE NO. 1-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE, BLOCK FIVE AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the Estes Valley Planning Commission has recommended numerous amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Block Five; and WHEREAS, said amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code are set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town that the amendments to the Estes Valley Development Code, Block Five set forth on Exhibit "A" and recommended for approval by the Estes Valley Planning Commission be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: The Estes Valley Development Code shall be amended as more fully set forth on Exhibit "A". Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 2003 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2003, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk ~ Amendments to the Estes Valley ~ Development Code, Block Five ~ Estes Park Community Development Department ,:00 Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue ~"""'"""* PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com TOWN BOARD MEETING DATE: January 14,2003 RM41' -- Z USFS TITLE: Amendments to the Estes Valley ke-F. - Development Code, Block Five at REOUEST: To make a number of changes to ~~in Â·>: USFS ~iord Fha the adopted Estes Valley Development Code. 6 LOCATION: Estes Valley, inclusive of the * USFS FRA/hp . 80./. Town of Estes Park. - APPLICANT: Estes Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: Proposed code changes include: Highway Corridor Design Standards. Comprehensive Plan. The proposed highway corridor design standards are intended to implement specific policies adopted by the Town Board, Board of County Commission, Town of Estes Park Planning Commission, and Larimer County Planning Commission through the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan in 1996. Following are excerpts from the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan, specifically from Chapter Six "Community Wide Policies": 2.1 Develop urban design plans to improve the appeal*nce and function of Beaver Point, Spur 66 Entrance, Highway 34 East. 2.5 Avoid the use of roofing materials which are light colored or reflect light. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block Five (Highway Design Standards) 1 2.6 The natural colors ofwood and stone are most desirable for building exteriors. 2.7 Facades should be broken up with windows, doors or other architectural features to providb visual relief. 2.8 Avoid use ofmetal siding along highway entries. 6.2 Protect the scenic character and visual quality ofthe open space and gateway experience to the Valley and Rocky Mountain National Park. 6.3 Protect and enhance Lake Estes as an entry to the Town of Estes Park. 6.5 Improve the overall image and character of developed areas within the Valley that detract from the visual quality of the Valley. 6.6 Ensure that new development minimizes the impacts to visual and environmental quality within ihe Valley. 7.2 Develop eco-tourism, which relies on a high quality physical setting and minimal impact on the environment, as a component of the existing tourism industry. 7.7 Establish the basis for a sound tourism market and sustainable economic climate. Town Board Directive. As, a follow-up to the Estes Valley Plan, the Town Board met on June 12, 2001, and discussed highway corridor design standards. At that meeting, the Town Board directed Staff to draft standards that address the following: 1. Provide appropriate restrictions on corporate architecture (e.g. fast food). 2. Restrict the use of large areas of primary colors on buildings (e.g. bright red roofs). 3. Restrict the inappropriate use of some building materials (e.g. metal buildings). 4. Prevent the construction of large expanses ofblank walls in unbroken planes. Based on this Town Board directive, Staff researched and drafted design standards. These standards .have been reviewed by the Planning Commission in three different public hearings. Staff has revised standards based on planning commission discussion, and now presents these standards to the Town Board. Estes Valley Development Code. In addition, Section 1.3 of the Estes Valley Development Code states a purpose and intent of the EVDC is to "work to improve the aesthetics and design of all primary gateways to the Town of Estes Park, including but not limited to Highways 7,34, and 36." Estes Valley Planning Commission. The Estes Valley Planning Commission reviewed these changes in November 2002. There was no one present to oppose these proposed standards. Proposed Development Code Changes - Block Five (Highway Design Standards) 2 It is Staffs opinion'these proposed highway design standards fulfill these specific policies of the Estes Valley Development Code, the Estes Valley Plan, and the Town Board directive issued in June 2001. HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DESIGN STANDARDS Â§4.5 SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS C. Highway Corridor Overlay District. 1. Applicabilitv. a. This section shall apply to all non-residential and multi-family residential development and/or re-development of structures anv portion of which is located within 100-feet of State Highway 34, State Highway 36. State Highway 7. and State Highway 66. b. The "CD" Commercial district shall be exempt. c. This section shall not apply to existing structures unless a development plan is required by this Code. d. Sub-section C.3.h "Building Color" shall not apply to existing structures unless a change in building color is proposed. 2. Purpose. Implement Community Wide Policies set forth in Chapter Six. Section 2.0 Communitv Desism. Section 6.0 Scenic and Environmental Qualitv and Section 7.0 Economics of the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. 3. Design Standards. a. Buildings or portions ofbuildings designed to represent or to replicate the recognizable physical form of a product to be sold, or a form commonly associated with a product to be sold (i.e. in a manner such that the building itself functions as a gvmbol or sign) are prohibited. b. Maximum building height shall not exceed twenty (20) feet above original grade within thirty (30) feet from highway right-of-way: dr. twenty-five (25) feet above original grade within thirty-five (35) feet from highway right-of-wav. c. Faca(les that face public streets shall include variation in the wall plane to reduce the apparent bulk and length of long buildings. Prominent , projections and/or recesses of at least four (4) feet horilontal offset must occupy at least 20% of the length of the facade. Building setbacks for projections on arterial streets mav be reduced to fifteen (15) feet: the Proposed Development Code Changes - Block Five (Highway Design Standards) 3 - average setback ofthe street facade shall be twenty-five (25) feet. Building setbacks for projections on non-arterial streets mav be reduced to ten (10) feet: the average setback ofthe street facade shall be fifteen (15) feet. Facade proiections and recesses should be integral parts of the building, and not superficiallv applied trim. graphics or paint (see figure 4.1). 25'..avg. boilding.' PROJECTIONS AND 10' setback-(Arterial RECESSESSHALLBE -3 44. . \\ 4' MIN . ......0. *'-Â·' 15'..min. 4- ...M-2 bllilding letback ---- -4--- (arteMal street) ... A. . WIDTH OF PROJECOONSAND i RECESSES (A & m SHALL BEAT LEAST 20% OF BUILDING LENGTH Figure 4-1 d. Long. uniform. continuous rooflines shall be avoided. Roof surfaces should be broken up with dormers, offsets, and variations in roof height. e. Highly reflective metal siding shall be prohibited as primary siding material. Â£ Roofing and exterior wall materials that are highly reflective shall not be allowed. g. All sides of a building that face a public street shall be finished with the same materials as the primary faâ„¢le. h. Building color. 1. Color scheme within the development shall consist of complimentary colors. 2. Color choices for all buildings shall be made from those allowed within the specified ranges defined below according to the Munsell Proposed Development Code Changes - Block Five (Highway Design Standards) 4 Color Notation System from the Munsell Book of Color available in the Community Development Department. 3. The Munsell system of color notation is broken into three (3) categories: hue, chroma and value. Chroma is the only characteristic with a set limit, which is as follows: bodv color is limited to a maximum chroma of six (61. Trim color is limited to a maximum chroma of eight (8). Accent color is limited to a maximum chroma of ten (10). 4. The number of hues used on one (1) structure is limited to three (3). This does not include additional hues for such elements as window sashes. porch floors. doors, ceiling half-timbers or roof coverings. 5. If three (3) hues are used, the color that covers the most building area is the body: the color covering the second most building area is the trim and the color covering the least building area is the accent color. 6. If two (21 hues are used. the color covering the lesser area is the trim color for purposes of regulating maximum chroma. [A note on implementation: As noted in the applicability section, building color standards would not apply until a change in building color. Staff would sent notice to all affected property owners of these proposed guidelines to inform them of code changes. In order to implement management of this, Staff would create a photo inventory of structures within the area of applicability. This photo inventory would be updated yearly, and any changes in building color noted. If a building had changed to a non-conforming color, Community Development would issue a letter to the property owner informing them of the need to comply with these standards. The photo inventory would not create the need for additional work hours, as Staff currently conducts a yearly photo inventory of signs. The building color inventory could be updated at that same time.I 4. Modification /Pom Standards. The Estes ValleÂ¥ Planning Commission shall have authority to waive or modify design standards set forth in Section 4.5.C in conjunction with a site specific development plan that advances the purpose and intent ofthis Section. [Should these changes be adopted, Staff would further modify the development code to include a definition of"average setback" and amend Sectioh 1.9.D "Setbacks - Building and Structure Setbacks" to clarify that the setback may be modified in accordance with this section.] Proposed Development Code Changes - Block Five (Highway Design Standards) 5 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Office Memorandum To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Richard E. Matzke'Ft 2,9,â€¢- I)ate: January 9,2003 Re: Electric Rate Hearing January 14, 2003 BACKGROUND: Following is a copy of the slides summarizing the electric rate study that will be presented by our rate consultant Max Kiburz of M.E. Kiburz and Associates during the rate hearing. Also included is a summary of the electric rate changes proposed by the study. The summaries of electric rate changes were included with all electric bills mailed during December 2002 and were published in the legal notice section ofthe Trail Gazette on December 13, 2002. The study recommends changes affecting all rate classes and recommends eliminating one rate and establishing two new rates. The overall impact of these changes result in a 6.25% revenue increase in 2003 and an additional 6.26% revenue increase in 2004. BUDGET/COST: The 2003 Budget includes a $425,000 revenue increase (5.61%) and the 2004 Budget includes another $425,000 revenue increase (5.14%). The revenue increase indicated by the rate study is $906,000 compared the two-year total in the Budget of $850,000. The financial forecast summary on page 14 of the slides projects deficits in all years going forward. The financial forecast indicates that a rate update should be performed during year 2004 to determine the appropriate rate action required for year 2005. RECOMMENDATION: The changes proposed by the electric rate study are necessary to maintain an adequate fund balance and provide funding for responsive system operation. The rate study was presented at the December 12, 2002 Light and Power Committee and received a favorable recommendation for Town Board action REM RATE STUDY PREPARED BY MAX KIBURZ, RATE CONSULTANT. INFORMATION PROVIDED TO LIGHT & POWER COMMITTEE DECEMBER 12, 2002 Note: There is no Page 11. AN,-COLONOLD# COl r LO CO 1-0 1- 00(9000(ON -h 4-1 00 LO 00 CU Â·r- LO 00 h h Â¥- CO '4 0)1 0 cO 00 CD LO AC\1000 " 91- e colo- 0- Ul- .t. 0 E 1.0 h 1.0 4 col N N CD 11- 00 N 2 .1 00 tri 0-IK. 00- 00 CO C\1 7- CO X LU If) O % CY) 91Â· r- O .-1 0 LO Lol e C\1 C\1 -Ic\1 col d 825 W CO O 4-100 O N - col- C) C\1 01 h CO tO 911 CO LO $ h - 21 E 0 001Â» 0 0 3 MI CD 00 0 colo h 8 66,<Dc\' CD N CO O 12 05 O x CE LU 4- 0 0 * 91- C) r o co cO O 01 N ,- C\1 - CU CO If) h h (D O 9110 C) Cr) C) h 00 91- CD N Câ‚¬C\1 9 Ul --cumuÂ·fo co- o NA ON 1 -t- co - W NN O NCDO 91Â· 1.0 00 0 0 *1 O h " Col- A h 1 - CO 00 03 CD N h - Â«11 h. O 00 10 911 CO LD co 00 0) LO. " CN. C)- OR h Q O---W-COQ W. CO N Cd N - h O O -- 10 O O O>1(D LO -8 re if)Â·- r h 4- 1-00)(DINO C 00 0 - h (0 1- 00 0 o N CJ h E 2 J g 0000000000100110 0000010 0 all al 0000 LO LO 0010 Al N g 0- 0 009 ,-1 r 17 N 001~ .-1 Â¥- cr) 09 cO 1-1 T A O 16 0 0 4- LO CO O) 10 4-1 - e ,- cu CON 00 CD CD O 1 - CD CO O) CO C\1 N - lf) C\11 CO 1 00 9- 00 CD 00 (O 9- 0 2~ Ia,U,4-CU-Cloo.hOOC)]CV CD. Ocr) ID /0 - TE; C\J Cd CJ Â·r- h c) CO â€ž Â·r- h hlcdf 0 0 N 00-h Cd 91Â· CO CO C) LO Â·r- Â·r- 1~ 1-1 CO . O 91- (O 10 CU If) CDC) p h CO. r- CM- - Lo N Qhoo- .-- r N h C\1 r CO CIO (D CD - m e 2 &0 (90 .-. Â¤88232 ye S aM 0 0 0 0 E S E =80 cougggE Z E Â£28 9.-5 2 22230 -O.@O.9. 82 3. U) t; S 0 05 00 WEE m ~ 5*8Â§*2@E~g ~~ 8 m E *E.g T- 013 CD 11 0027=0 3, cr@ Ajai~ 5-=di~ 0 43 (D C E 0 4 1 5 --2 ~%0 LU ~ E LU 0- O Residential 2,813,677 3015591 218270 3233861 Residential Demand 765176 6886 834041 Residenti 168261 13741 182002 Revenues and Rate venues/ Revenues/ Z68'8EZ Z68'8EZ Z68'8EZ Z68'8EZ sa!Jules 999'49 999'ts 9991,9 sexel liolhed 9 L9'EE L 9 L9'EE L 9 L9'EEL sweueq pue suo!sued eeholdwEI 06 L'96 L 06 L'96 L 06 L'96 L 1!edek pue eoueuejuie'Al 182441 1132 1937 000'9 L 00'9L 000'9 L Â£88'008 288'002 L99'06 L99'06 Genera 1782270 73517 1706605 70396 7749 989'890'E 989'890'8 L LO,9,8'E 92*9*Z' L 9*Z' L Adjusted 2003 Adjustment: Expenses Increase ~'9 LB'E TOWN OF ESTES PARK 7,229,1 6 Test Year ecember 31, - SenueAeule i estco 1.xlsestcos2001.xls INWO U 1/9/2003 Revenues: ResidentialÂ· 0 O 0 0 - 03 1 - 91- 03 h (\1 01(0 1.0 00 10=1-OCD aloooN o CD O 1 0 * CD 10 0 - 1.0 001 CO 1 1 e co C) 91- O 0 0 4- 0 0 C) C\1 09 N C) C\1 (\1 N C\1 0) 91 - co O 00(DNED If) t. CO 91Â· Ecfco-cy-00-0 of Câ‚¬O co-uico-*lco-(D- 4 *GiNOf of CDCUJ o C C\1 3 00 0 09 0 00 00 - 91- 4.-NO 0 0 - r & 1 CD oR- C\1 N h r A-Coul 0 00 X LIU 00 1 C\' C\1 A- 01 CO CO 0 0 0 1-1 .1- h N C)10 0 00 1 0 CD C\191- Al AloGoN 000 0 -0909â€ž 4- Co C) 9- 03 00 N co - O 1-0 e 22m22 3 CO N CD C\1 IN 10 00 03 4- 0 1- R 05 Kai docv- 00-,--câ‚¬4-N N W (0 1.- 4- 1.-NO A Â¢9 (9 91- O Ir) C) (0 00. N al h 41 ANN th cO =11 9 O co CO C) 0 CO 4- 00 Cd cvs- CD O 0 9-1 0 * 1- 4- 03 N C\I C>lcD Lo 00 N C) h LO Ir) 91' O (D C\1 N CO N 00 0 91- h O 0 0 4-1 O 91Â· CD tO O - 10 001 09 91- 91Â· 4- 00 LO h C) Cr) C) 4- C) 1~ 00 (D O O Lr) C) at. C) cv col h C)- Cy. cy. cy- CM. C)- CNI n 00- 0 0 0 00 h CO CO N ED C\1 h (D 00 (D xi- cD CO a N 00 O CDC) co 09 1- 91- p O 00 1- 4- 1- h O N 00 - cooee I cdc\J ool O C) Co O (D ID (0 4-1 0 (D ;ACS CqcJÂ«aS N Of o (0-06-06"4(Â¥f h c\1 E o co n 1 (0 OR N N C\1 h .1 hoc\1 CD- C.0 CO- It CD CO U'000010 000000100 00000001000 Ore') 011- 00) 4- 00 00 Col N O O r CO C\1 C\1 00 cJ- cq 44 U.4 41 01 9 CU " CU .-â€ž- 0 LD O 0 Al al LD O CO- .2 Cd of 6 4-11' C) C\110 CD 10 0 C\1 1 N 02 O 0 4 CD N N C)10 1.0 10 10 91- 0 00 CO O N C) O (D - 10 001 CO 1 helf)-00 00 LO CR. 4 C\' C\' C) C\!]Co 00 hclhcN.h 01 CH co cy ocil Cd id CD *1 0 12 C\14- 1- ocr) 91-h 00 CO. N N CO co CD r 91- A C\' r 1 1- CD C) col 1 0 - 00 CO. N N CD 2 cp LO -0 U) So D .92 0-1 2 05 =0) @ 3.~ 1-6 < R 3 -~ i . C C CD O 9 3 3 0 C =al H - 22 M - 2.06 Â£03 920 -JE Ja@-EOE â‚¬ E Eu) O Pu)ES=== Ek=J-_ 3 2802%22@Â£Â£womg~d Â£9 gaco-02 WEEO 1- < 1- 0 LLE al- Per Revenues and Revenues/ Revenues/ Et,6'Z L 2*6'Z k 2*6'Z L sexul Jel.No pue Ilol 686'602 686'603 00'06- 686'66E (t, se!iddns pue eo ZE'ZE ZgE'EE ZE'ZE seeJ leuo!ss 9ZZ'E L 9ZZIE L eouel 268'OZZ 363'099 senueAel=I luell 896'EZZ eD 01 Jelsuell 9'*'9*g 298'8 1!sodea JeluolsnO L 299'29 1 ZoE'ZG L Â£88' LEG' L 2003 2004 294,944 115,000 409,944 64,954 2 90,254 nance and supplies 86,269 Adjustment Expenses Increase Expenses 968'*t suo!sued 9 91!Jauea e Subtotal 1,180,709 1,180,709 ls-I- TOWN OF ESTES PARK Revenue Requireme Test Year ended December 31, 2 9,909 EnP~~P~nsion and benefits (3) 24,061 laries 241,048 00*'808 estcos2001.xlsestcos2001.xls ' L (0901)Jewolsno 18 uoilnq!49!a Customer Accounting Un ollec ble accounts provements From Bo!/'LIes (-)1!0!Jea/(+)snid,ns 1/9/2003 CO 9 Cr 0 26 0 n 2 LO 32 32 32 000 UD O Ul CD tO tO LO 32 32 OO 03 10 10 LO 2 32 6 il W 00 O LO 0 0| 16 tO LO 0. O LO .S . J 682. I E -J -Â§ Al 64 w. - Adjusted 2003 2004 Revenues and Rate Revenues/ Revenues/ Adjustments Expenses Increase Expe Increase Expen , Percent of Sales 10.96% Test Year e December 31, 2001 First TOWN OF ESTES PARK nue Requirement Transfers to Gen. Fund 9.50% .50% Reduced interest earnings to reflect 2003 budget. Hydro museum g inated. estco 1.xlsestcos2001.xls 1/9/2003 Notes: 1. Remove Wind Power. Increased to reflect 2003 b Factors used to c Inside energy Franchise and In lieu of tax 28- NION- 232 068Â°mg 00=flool- 3 3 3} 11Â°0.')17 Cy.&1 000- Ct 2-31% P:- as coo 2 332 , 0880 2330 ?S (.1 7 Cul N - E rt V - tO M M 00 383 LO 32 0-NO CO (0 O 2 cv Cl LO R r 3 -088919/ El; 23@*3% 0 00 N e - Cy 46 g 812 0 *SEM= Em % 0 r 91- 4- to ils! W i m '0 HEREER 35 3% 883wm 88 0- A ..IN . 00 W C\1 01 1-1 3 3 MER 89800 C) 0 *0 4- CU - 9- r- LON 8-9 .2 g 22222% 2, 5*222-2% N ' â€ž do 3 Me 91- to M M Col N E 0) coN *LOOKNO g Be PEGARE E O-M=/Colh 02 CuleÂ¥---- 8Â§ r- ,+ cycycy "-1~ r.: 22 S (OC,CeMN= 1.0 f co C\1 -00 00 h CO CDC)1 N 00 0 Thrcg 58 E.g- CO CO co 9301(5@ 0 92 0 9 22 El- M * % 0 - Cul C) AN<0000109 5 22 00 00 E (9 -MAN 00 r-N 0- W- - c> w - cq r- cu - BEE CO 00 C) 10 OfFI<05-,tri O% Lo CO N M CO 321 9 T Ki e CO. CÂ¥) CO C)CD=COt-IO R y ZE@8% 572 ga 82 RMR RQRKRJ 2% 35#43#FAN& %0 3158 RE:*912 0, g N 1.0 4- 4- Cy <0 Â£ 29 A al - cy N W 0 0 00Â§ 2 a ~ 3 ng* A LON 10 1,32 0 32 8:19:8822Â° -h. 8.*.8.26*w- cy C>ONA/00 RE :82 28WE 22 *68292~2 _ - O co CD I - col * Y - - r r d M 99 -r- Enszm~ ultncy..1 I- 95 ne*Ege 2~ 222322 %Â§ 51%3@M5 O N -NCOLoCDO 0-h.M-CUq W. Cp - Nth.M-- N cul - C\1 N co Cul - â€ž- & U) C) M (3) . 1% N . .i .i CN 29 g' E S;% 3 g 42 cou 0 0 * 3 -% 2 ki 5 2 1 5 -8 2 0 1 3 c = c ,p -@ 28~ 2 a -8335*a~J , OZZMRZE 7,229,176 2,813,6 156,447 1,711,436 1,619, 171,778 1,019 22,301 2 r Income 79,128 1,115 Outdoor RMNP 1,790,563 180,739 1,136 1,319 23,415 2 680' sll!8 Jo J LOE 1,163 1 Purchased Demand 9,663 996'6 slouow M '87 6Lt'Â£92'2 L k LEE'Â£90'CE 2* 62*'892'2 1 2 0'88 0Â£926 estcos2001.xls Allocation Ended December 31, 2001 1,790,87 EXPENSES~ AFTESTTO RAATE CLASSES Revenue (Deficit)/Surplus: Percent of Electric Sales Allocation and Billin Units: M>1 puewea Bum 1/9/2003 Revenues: Customer estcos2001.xls ~ ClassExp 1/9/2003 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Classification of Operating Expenses Test Year ended December 31, 2001 Adjusted Classification Exmansm Earamater Demand EmrgY QuaiQmat -2d.EQ~ Expense Purchased Power (3) Demand 2,068,586 Direct 2,068,586 0 0 0 Mndpower 1,746,425 Direct Q 1,746,425 0 0 1122 2 QQ 11,172 Subtotal 3,826,183 2,068,586 1,746,425 0 11,172 Distribution O&M Salaries 728,897 DP 472,735 0 256,162 Payroll taxes 54,566 DP 35,389 0 19,177 Employee pensions and benefits 133,616 DP 86,658 0 46,958 Maintenance and repair 196,190 DP 127,241 0 68,949 Supplies 29,909 DP 19,398 0 10,511 Insurance 26,990 DP 17,505 0 9,485 Rent 2,200 DP 1,427 0 773 Other 821 DP 21.Q Q 2.921 Subtotal 1,180,709 765,763 0 414,946 Customer Accounting Salaries 409,944 Cust. 0 0 409,944 Payroll taxes 33,261 CUM. 0 0 33,261 Employee pensions and benefits 90,254 Cust. 0 0 90,254 Maintenance and supplies 86,269 Cust. 0 0 86,269 Uncollectibel accounts 5,217 Cust. 0 0 5,217 Insurance 6,952 Cust. 0 0 6,952 Other 1232 Cust. a Q d239 Subtotal 626.138 Q Q 626.-128 Total Distribution & Customer 1,816,845 765,763 0 1,051,082 Percent Distribution & Customer(TD&C) 100.00% 42.15% 0.00% 57.85% Amin. & Gen. Salaries 241,048 TD&C 101,597 0 139,451 Payroll and Other Taxes 17,942 TD&C 7,562 0 10,380 Office Supplies 209,939 TD&C 88,485 0 121,454 Outside Services 32,357 TD&C 13,638 0 18,719 Insurance 12,775 TP 8,341 0 4,434 Employee Benefits & Pensions 44,395 TD&C 18,712 0 25,683 Other 212224 TP 1&3213 Q ZE.121 Subtotal 777,790 381,548 0 396,242 Total Operating Expenses 6,420,818 3,215,897 1,746,425 1,447,324 11,172 Percent Operating Expenses(TOE) 100.00% 50.17% 27.25% 22.58% Capital Improvements From Current Revenues 770,292 TP 502,957 0 267,335 Transfer to Gen. Fund 773,305 TOE 387,989 210,701 174,615 Franchise Fee & In Lieu of Tax 246,237 TOE 123,544 67,092 55,601 Interest on Customer Deposil 8.862 TOE &.Adla 2.&1.a 2.QQ1 Subtotal 1,798,696 1,018,936 280,207 499,553 Debt Service 303,400 Total Plant 198,103 0 105,297 Total Cost of Service 8,522,914 4,432,936 2,026,632 2,052,174 11,172 Allocation Factors Distribution Plant (DP) 64.86% 0.00% 35.14% Total Plant (TP) 65.29% 0.00% 34.71% Sheet 2 1 estcos2001.xls Plaht 1/9/2003 TOWN OF ESTES PARK CLASSIFICATION OF ELECTRIC PLANT IN SERVICE AT ORIGINAL COST YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Separation Balance as of 12/31/01 Parameter Per Adjusted Brohs Adiusimaois Elani Demand QuaiQmer Hydraulic Production Land and Land Rights 2,036 0 2,036 2,036 0 Demand Structure and Improvements 181214 Q 16Q.31A 1.Er.314 Q Demand Subtotal 162,350 0 162,350 162,350 0 Transmission Poles and Fixtures 0 0 . 0 0 b ,Demand Overhead Conductors/Devices 0 0 - 0 0 0 Demand Underground Conductors Q Q Q Q Q Demand Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 Distribution Plant Land and Land Rights 225,452 0 225,452 225,452 0 Demand Structures and Improvements 805,171 0 805,171 805,171 0 Demand Station Equipment 3,093,944 0 3,093,944 3,093,944 0 Demand Poles, Towers, Fixtures 1,468,348 0 1,468,348 881,009 587,339 60%D/40%C Overhead Conductors/Devices 1,271,183 0 1,271,183 762,710 508,473 60%D/40%C Underground Conduit 2,167 0 2,167 1,300 867 60%D/40%C Underground Conductors 2,202,780 0 2,202,780 1,321,668 881,112 60%D/40%C Line Transformers 1,469,272 0 1,469,272 881,563 587,709 60%D/40%C Services 469,103 0 469,103 0 469,103 Customer Meters 1,116,988 0 1,116,988 0 1,116,988 Customer Installation Cust. Premises 1,365 0 1,365 683 683 50D/50C Street Lights ZE*Ell Q Za&.216 26LA58 26LÂ£1:58 50D/50C Subtotal 12,860,689 0 12,860,689 8,340,958 4,519,732 Distribution Plant Allocator %(DP) 100.00% 64.86% 35.14% Dist. Plant Delivery %(DPD) 100.00% Total Above Plant $ 13,023,039 0 13,023,039 8,503,308 4,519,732 Above Plant Allocator % (PA) 100.00% 65.29% 34.71% General Plant Structure and Improvements 108,248 0 108,248 70,680 37,568 PA Office Furniture 207,285 0 207,285 135,345 71,940 PA Computer 586,551 0 586,551 382,985 203,566 PA Transportation Equipment 845,763 0 845,763 552,235 293,528 PA Stores Equipment 18,021 0 18,021 11,767 6,254 PA Tools and Shop Equipment 146,614 0 146,614 95,731 50,883 PA Laboratory Equipment 140,907 0 140,907 92,004 48,903 PA Power Operated Equipment 5,639 0 5,639 3,682 1,957 PA Communication Equipment 19LZel Q 19Lal 122.121 am PA Subtotal 2.2aiZBB Q 2.256.789 1473.556 Z83.233 Total Electric Plant 15,279,828 0 15,279,828 9,976,863 5,302,965 Total Electric Plant Alloc. %(TP) 100.00% 65.29% 34.71% Sheet 3 1 r- 00101(000-000*0(00(9 001 e o Al Lf) ,- CD CO N O LO ID Lf) (9 (\1 LO -1 * CO 2 60 81 -- h car- h = 41 q(9-11(0-CV- Â¢9 0 1.0 1 r r (\11 (9 1 4- 09 0 0 0 U 2 09*gONCOCD-ODOOCU- CD .6 MI 0 u, v.! . 91: IN â€ž 91- <0 N O O Â·r- f //p im -COOD - (4 -08(vcdootui 00 1- 4 0 LLI < 35 U) ~ *El-CD C\1* ANCO C\I C\1 N OCONÂ©000 U N 00 0) CU CO C) ID O) 00 0 0 CO El- O C\1 - ~ 60(40664Lric,jui#tdduitcciK C\1 00 N r 1-Col- SE 00 O 0 N O 0 CD tO C\1 91- 1 0 0 - A,-000)00,-AC)O>COO 00 0 00 0) O - ID CU 18 46 CO O - h (\1 r N LO CD 0 0 â€ž CD Â·r-1 001 0 C\1 U 4- 00 10 09 4- 00 CO 00 CU - 0 001 =11 0 1.0 C 0-ON *CD-CD cDC) 7- c\lcD qut]UD 0 c Â£ 03 St CO g ci N (01101 CO. CJ N C\1 20"- 4- 1- Â¤ 38 %8 = 311 Ocor-Jr Z .i<< 1- 0 C O = 6 -0 - 222(02-6 80-0-0-0-1918 m 65 2 (0 2 02 2-Ezzz * A al NEÂ® =1 7 1-~=666-51= [rm_(2 00_11$0*=g_mco_ Weighting Factors Coin. Number Weighted L'9 L Sheet 4 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Test Year Ended December 311 60972 Weighted Number of Bills 79,97 estcos 1.xls Residential ~~~82 Residential-Demand sidential TOD Demand sll!.8 dNV,11=1 ssel lejol dNINEI I 1/9/2003 3~85Â§**~6%**&*N gui -12- 8 65 - 2 8 Â°Â° R - 22 k CO P Niq# EN 'r -â€ž of Ci- EW-Ei-Â®R-ES f) ce /9 NN99 Cd Of C- am-ESÂ°Â°R-:82$08 NAC: 4- 6 2.- - E5-0502-NESÂ®UNM@Â§ O - 05 Of 22-%8Â°Â°R-182$Â°Â°UNMEÂ® N 4- 00 cd 4 Of OF &~-88Â°02-&52#05NM A gr - M 8}m'-85Â®R-ES#Mt:Nm'*Â§ 8 -1 gu -3 C) Of 9~ 00-Eli.R-EERMCNME@ m â€ž- 3 0- 4 00-00 LLC') O@ &83-15Â°Â°2-:32&305:NWS!9 LLI ~ 0%3 3 0 - 00 00 (0- O -r Cl O 0 Z GIC)-C\1000000-(04-NOODNMES 2 8-# 228 h .0-0 01 01 O 0 .r- 00 00 *1-88Â°Â°2-EXACet:NME& â€žCt 01 0- 00 00 n*-FRHEE-*52Â®UNMit - 00 00 . 00.62#.~'E â‚¬ &5<< 1-1-2 9 2 E J . E:@& EMEMS-E*mE co c 0 c o E E E z Z Z E E crm(DU)OJ N CO Co 1- O LON CD r- 4- LO 32 law 688'80 1 800'80 L L60'6 911!8 dNAbl ssel lejol estcos2001.xls #Bills ES PARK 91 .& EXHIBIT MONTHLY N Test Year Ended JeMOCI pue il15!1 MJed sels) Aq pep!Aed emp 6um!Cl WOJ:1 (L) Residential Demand Customer Class 1 Residential esidential al RMNP 1/9/2003 9310N1OO=I I 9*0% 32 0 0 r g 4 tritd g. m r. *30Â£ %88 4 00 to 10 0 0 0 1 32 CD /# 0 3 532% 8 32* 6 E N Logy %522% 54/.3 8 .-r 0 06 M O LD 0%9 20#32 21 82.4.4, 9 &1 349% %05 NCN O M 0 Â§ 0 N 30 5% . 454 2 0 C) 82 5 48 78 RER, agmgg 0 1 -0 &56&Nâ„¢ 8222 C 1 01 2 80 - LiD LO co co Le ~1- CO CD 9 1- Â°Â° :82 223 IE i' m MAB 333 Ri H N CV ~ WRM *220 . 5Â»5 /2229. W 09 .t 8%3â‚¬gyRADS 10 h 8 p-0-~ ~ EN * 22% U) >) 0 55 E o E , .. 0111<O Z - N m ent Demand Allocator % 11.54% 21.29% 0.10 0.03% 0.00% ice Small Comm. Gen. Service Large Comm. Outdoor MÂ®t ~1~-Month (1) 112' ,634 40,40 8,765 10,74 ,62 3,6 23,067,321 150,157 30,363,531 120,180 2,76 79,972 COINCIDENT DEMAND OR BY RATE CLASS PRPA Measured Demand KW-Months (2) 21~~08 50.00% 55.00% TOWN OF ESTES PARK Average 1\,~r~11 Hours 34.98% 9Pe4S Exhibit Sl~to.ig~~ec:t~A~Zts From an approximation of a Bary type coincidence factor curve. i estcos2001.xls 1/9/2003 Rate Class Load Fact ent Factors (3) page 2. 1, 86ed NOOCOFfINOCD#OC>LOOI =flme 3% M E 2 5 O CDOO C\100(\1 00(D 0) r col NI C\-c\-O-0 t-#-O* (Dno)]IN 1 - H.-000-c,Nce-cdâ‚¬ We m &21 NO CDCU 0 00 H " r 00 N ni LO O -*-00 LO 00 CO 001 (910 h CD 00 0 0 91-100)000 C\1 91- CD C) - Cul C\1 O CU (\1 Y 001 -1 0 h 0 - r LO CO ,- tO h - C)CU<DC)-r Ocr)h CD CD- r.1 'pl 0- Q2 r Uj 1 co-Wâ‚¬do câ‚¬uic; câ‚¬ dq H Nu N 2,NN' C) 91- 00 1- 1.0 N 00 4. 4 0% a, coÂ· 7.- " CH co. " 01 00- N N 00 00 0010 100000 10 00 COODANO(00300 CD 0) Al 3 * r O C) 00 *00 0 C\1 1- 00 05 - 0 N- h cr) 00 " CD 00- h 00 * CD 1.0 91- -CJUTOCâ‚¬ CO O W AN~ 7--COCONLOCD- 1-1-04- 1- COLO -- c) 0) 00 0 0 * 01 *1 1 0 CO Â·r- * Co C\' co O ,- ,- CD O co h Colo>10 - 4- tO Al h O C\1 - Â·r- C\1 ca cuw NO>lcD (D -10 LO Lf)- â€¢31 h co (65*INICÂ¢4 >Â· (4 o,i 10 5 91- LOla>10 0 CO 1- (0 If) 5 h K- 91- 00 0 4- 09 0 00 0 10 0 0 1- h 01 00 0 N CDC) 0 00 â€ž 03 0 03 h 0 O A ID 00 0 O O CU O 9- 91- CO T- 91-|CD C) ID - 91- C\1 to - C\1 00 00 LD-WOONAUDW)(9 CH 1 7.00]h C\luz - 0- 1 % 0- r- 0 w --dh n câ‚¬00-4-co-co ui~ Co d N u) cu -c LO W CIO (D 00 (D r O 4- Â·r- CD LO u) aol 4- co 4- 0. T- cO 11 4- C\1 1- CD to < N of of O N N N Co O CO * O - Cul CD * 1- N N 09 c\1 91- 00 - 9- NO 4-0 0 3 0 CO * O LOO@u)Cvh CO N 00 CO C\110 - e 00-00- h * C\' CO-00. CD. CO " 1) h * CR. h - o co 03 Lo O CU Â«Cr) 7- CU CO r.2 *1 06 CD' O 10 CD d CON h h co CD C) C) Â·r- tO LO 10 001 4- C\1 00 CO UD. cD. CN - Cl n 1-- 041 C) 0) CD 10 - ID Or- C\1 OONOINC\11.0 N 91- 0 00 00 0 h - CO h O 1- N 91- 00 C\1 0 1-0 1- O 11- 0 00 91- 91Â· Cu,- C) c\1 C) r O C\' Cr) 03 91- CO 00. co O h col- 4- C\1 *LO OC\1 00 - --4.-- 4-U).4-CdÂ«cv ni (0 0 Â·r-looN e Â· N LO cd- 4 LO T- 1- E- CO CD O>I LD CD O Â·r- m W " n O- 11 CD C\1 00 10 C) 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 Co ol O 00 CN 00 03 0 CD CD e h 1- O to o CU CO 00 00 C\1 Â·r- (D 00 ID XMN 00 1- (9 91- C\1 0) CDC') Â·r- Â·r- C) 4- 0)C\lcD *- 00 - 0 "10 C\lCD. OR.ca OCCE 1.f~ p- -~do *cdoo-4 0-cu coli m 00 .i N LO 1- 00 CD - LOONCO CO (0 Al 1 03 H LO CO- Co CO 1- 0. 0 /g 04 01 CO N 13 & N E cot 2 .2 3 ~ 6& a - &038 H.E E aoÂ®O 2 E221 && 8 0 0 ..2 t 002< 1-1- Â¢ E E ..8}= Ng = M EM E .2 0 -05 H cÂ» 2 CO LL -= 2 0 E & m U) C 2 22 *: E 3 6- omu)-1= 0 0 Â®Pop 8 0- a. d.i :8 CD = a) a) a)%30 c (6 2 0 -O-Â¤zzz@ -m o s I = m -co EUEDÂ®E a) E Â® m 55 5 66 1 â‚¬2 985:.SE@Ce.SI GU)(92]50*mrocru#-,t-- 2. ymmmMOU)(OJNO :El 2 CIO 1- C\1 00 00 4- C) LON CD O 1- 91- to ,--C\IC')00*C)1-f)he @ 6 w M e 36 m z 22 Residential 5,097,507 3,893,009 2,710,287 3,363,600 2,880,572 2,764,108 -ILnk,4 ~ oLo~||n r 968'8 899'8 (t) 11 910'z Ce) ;6u 8070O~~uwawSo%fle SE 7 ELE'* Lge'E (8) pueluea Exhibit 2 kWh&KW Test Year Ended Decem ~er ~~200~~MAND Residential demand 1,737,666 1,386,896 UnZNS ~~~ 792,624 723,871 Residential Demand 13,000 11,880 7,120 Resi 267,124 24 1,432,632 2,201,7 9,798 1 Service 2,072,384 2,76 e Comm. T 5,580 1 unicipa 203,713 21 TOWN OF ESTES PARK ESTIMATED MONTHLY ENER 802'9 L L J .S March Du!146!1 loo estcos2001.xls Kwh (1) L (g) ied!0 leMOd pu!M 1/9/2003 L 91Â· M CN .-9 .r N N 0- 1 0 Bimia-m- cr) 3 co m Â· mcg Al 0 1 0)100191- 0 91. 1- 1 * 00 r N 01 101 0) W 91Â· N C) 92 1- r C\11 "1 OCE 911 r- e O .1- CN N ./ CO CO 0 Â¢9 00 - Mi-oo 0 9- * 32 - r- O -1 LO CO C\1 LO' 01 *- 2(,Igg ID to CO CO g toi 0 ,- 4-Noo>BCD 00 h El-NOW r CD- 03- A Mgm 2 a) 00 d in P W CO 0 -0 ES LiD * 01 0)1 0 - O = 91- 32 N N 01 01 M N (NING,Lf) O N N Lol L.Q Q (\1 CN 1.0 LO 09 09 d CO R O h 0 8%931 00 CD XI- N o 1300 N QUD- 0 A 1-CD LO * 0> CO CO i F 1- O 00 col col - 1.0 a)(v 0Â¤32 CO 10 COl NION cv N u'l too- 6-ga 03 00 CO CO 1< CO 0000 71 OIN G NOO N CO col 010 0 al N Lol O LD Ng N cd 7 911 ag @22 << 0- 2 6 Z E &; 44 Emor .E v U) Ij -= = 0) O-02Â£ O-2 6 16 Zzz- 00 (6 E..E 666-MEE 2 0 2 m m m (01-1- LL LU LL LU 111 LLI - 91- 1.0 - Cy CO 4 LO Co h O 3 0 26 Z ELE'V t6'4 61+'t Ze"g .,9,9 646'9 EST MATE MONTHLY N AND DEMAND Residenti 15 31, 2001 155 28 OF ESTES P RK 'Afueue Me d uo Du!sn Jo~~ peol All#uout 960* B Bullunssse peleums3 %69'81 %916Â£ Joped peol puell.lea le!luep!sekd provided by Estes Park Light and Power Department Sheet 7 ing a monthly load factor of 30%. m Town's measured demand history for this rate class. stimated assuming a 35% monthly load factor. stimated assuming a 38% monthly load factor. 701081 peol X14 juoiu %ge e Butulnsse pelel.uns ss RMNP Load i estcos2001.xls Shep MeeM JO JeqUInN Mead UO SJnOH Exhibi 1/9/2003 Hours CO 00 1.- AÂ¥-00)001~<DOCD=-9.-7 O - h Al 1- al 1.0 CD O 0 ,-CULOCDOONCD L.DOCDOOst#-~ 00 10 09 91- 00 N 09 00 N 0 09 nwn*.00. . CO CO 1- 0-Cu * CO CD O)-CO O r 31 <5- r- Ocr) O 00 CO 10 1< 6 4 t<' m Â· - N cd 05 0, Of Â¥- O 10 CO C\1 CD * 91- 00 1.0 00 00 If) O e 00 Lo 0 h 0-0.-CD"-h UD 14 CO N CD-* O.- co 00 0 4 W cy .- 1- N CO .-9- O 0 0 CO 00 C\1 0 - O 0 - 01 - C) 00 A A 4- 00 e cD - O CO O Er N N N N Â¥- O to CO O N N 9- C\1 Al U) 00 00 O N ,-C)Â·,- CO CO Â·r- CD LO C\1 1- 00 hh4(cl--10 C) Co O 00 O-fcâ‚¬NK' 444 CUC\INN N 4 d d 4 co r O h p O LCD LO COIN V C\1 a) 9- =f It M- C\1 -h O 0 C\1 of cf O â„¢ 00 91- 0 04-000000100 000 LO CO 0 91- 1- C\1 recoo N COINONG)*Cy)00 00 0) 4-1- 10 CO h - 4- 00 CD CO LO- P- CO- 01 10- W 00 0 CO. co-Ul co 0 N 000 h M- h 1 h#C\1(04 64 ,- CD CM Ui d. d > 44 h OLD,- U) 1Â·- * 1010 - 1- O - CO Â·r- C\- r Z C) Cf 00 cooee Ola>loo e h 10 LO CO CD 00 h tO CU CO O CO O) 00 N O)1 Co Co 91- h O CO C\I c\I CO o .r- CO CO CO 9001 ocincH O 0 91- al 00 LO cric\1 Clcol U) 00 -16,2 CD CD co tri Al o co C) OR 8 " CDO O O OLD C\1 N CO O 1-0 00 CD CO C\14- N O Al 10 O 00 09 N CD C) xi- 00 10 4- 1- 4-1 0 Lo 00 . 0 0 If) LQ Cy h 3 00 00 ./ cv- Uj. 1â‚¬ vt- 0) IC - - 333# 11 00 C> cf CD 65 ~ 0 H e :RE-=be Ea3 /06&030 O 00 r *11 -4 0131-9 < < 0- c>%08.8,8 H .-26Â£ a Mt N 1H W mt i â‚¬ â‚¬ 4-c~ 2 M- *Ua ~aâ‚¬. @dEM Ag M -3 12 09 6 2E -5, $ 5-@930*Â§2~22-2 3 41 Â¥ 5 % 5 P 8 @ 8 15 % 2 % :3 2 3 :3 2 -2 2 CD.E E E s 0 0 0 N Â® E o * 1 1 Ircruu)021$0*(ccoinco 1-,1-<. Minm=mou)(523#OR CO 00 - C\1 03 00 4- C) 1.0 h CD O - 1 10 - C\1 CO CO 91- O) 10 N CD .* 6 Â®Me 36 CC Z Ez Residential 3,278,102 2,443,427 3,320,091 3,778,088 40,408,765 Residential demand 525,654 440,864 832,023 1,075,2 10,743,628 idential TOD Demand 1,840 800 76,92 8170' L L/9'9 6**'9 Exhibit 2 kWh&KW 167,932 161,504 3 2,418,784 1,631,764 1,8 12,336 9,979 3,010,622 2,020,826 2,5 Comm. TOD 6,900 20,64 16,89 estcos2001.xls Kwh (1) 1/9/2003 1-10010 N bR Col *1 0 LO 1 U~ Ul OZ. 25 al C\1 Col Col h O r O r-100100 1.0 1 2 2 33 e N *1 1 OR A N th; 21 00 A CO CO LO eli (\1 O 91- el N Â© H 1- hl Col h - r N rM r-- Â£2 >1 W W O 00 00 Z1 LO 0 N 0010 W - N (01010 0 4:Rittae N Â·=11 1.Q q A M al 1-h C\1 N 0>leo 00)CD e =r N r 0 #lo,co N N 1 h h CO CO u~ A c 22 kE â‚¬ 2% d240~ 2 E 18:88 I CO I-. -0 5 m z m (0 Sc C O -1 .(0 /6 v #-5 -5 3 ma)25 49 & 8 1 2 e % OL D. x - -O m 1- co co #ZZâ‚¬-EE E.EE.E.E SaN-MEE 2 0 200 Emmu) #i- LL Ill LL LU LU -4-to -C\I CO 91- If) O h 0- a. z ES 0 0 a, 0 CD 0 12 211 ~ li ~ .(6) 182 26 860'09 Z99'9 8 LO'S 9E9'f 889'* Exhibi- _ kV W oIL SJnoH LE dep >leGAA JO Jeql.UnN *61 Mead UO SinOH 96Â£0EE 00.0Â£ %919 L Joloed peol pueluaa le!juep!seN 2 10049 Estimated assumin mor n's measured dema c 6u!WrISSSE peleW!193 estcos2001.xls 1/9/2003 Notes: S U N (\1 9- 4. r- Cobt 00 .r- r N O 00 U-) 911 V 4. Ul LO.nul.CD*.2 6 21 â€ž32 ANÂ»REE:i u H wro- 00. 00 40 CO co Wigonizc= Ag Er N. A 00 4- co * W O 66 21 51 M g W g g. 3 - 00. r m 09 (CLo 0, 10 ID CO 00 to - N O) 10 00 ~ CD CD CNI hâ„¢.9.2.*22.R 51 222 r iD N CD ES - 66 ZI CV e 2- X * M n C) u, 28%882*22* 8 Ul 00. 0 CO 10 N < O M (O 0 V 0 Cl (N. 09 Com REm 00. 00. CO. EXE 88! M2= 2 >1 LO 00 - OLOCD -El lr- .Â·- ,Â£ A .r o 10 N N + 9- E CDr-m e w C) N V 0 0 0 (9 h (0 00 ID c Â®1 NES A-1.h t~i e- W#K 6Â£ U.1 0 3& fl *50 <ew 3% 9 2O EGE Wa) REN CO~ LON- cd ,- ,- CO CD CO - CNI 4%8 0) OCD Zo 0 O (D er) CD O LD n h (Â¥1 LO. U-~ C) N LCD C) 4- 2 2 4 gi Bi .CN 1 RI E &;ic@&18] h M. - 0- 0- M C) - rug *#gE--5 r - (1 - e 0 Eeit WREG!:23;EWE 8 900.00 - 03 - CNI - - 0 0. N. 66 0 -25 24*02- 68 â€¢r- LL N O 0-09 (90-0 O 6 0 5 0 CZ *22532123@DA NO > 91- 10 4- Â£ CD - 04 -4 RE Re@22=-CORIE *m : 262 â€¢r- â€¢r- N .- r- -.. e co REâ‚¬0 =W g .cl:co@ e 2% 11 -0 7% *â‚¬â‚¬ 25 22*,8 2% 6- 30*A=:qu2228%34 ..< EME CD (D m 0) h CO 8 - CD El- g .r- 0 C.Egp -*c-- e e J .252 3 &3 Mi 19,430 9 7,902 6,935 16,785 20,990 5,025 10 3 4 723 8,817 23 8,815,582 8,7 8 9,353,675 8,671,076 9,2 0 9,827,033 11,917,736 116,928,374 39,634 4 16,413 22,077 8 70 59, 87 465,500 8,777, 3 8,775,948 8,7 3 ,688 9,337,262 8,648,999 9,1 1,6 9 116,462,874 2,234 ,777 140,305 130,066 1 8,3 1,753,926 89'Â£88'â‚¬- 9,180,671 9,542,552 7,50 9,542,616 8,83 9,639,494 6,888,2 28 111 11,904 19,558 165,2 1 140,916 126 208,097 .03613 0.03754 0.03145 0.03522 0.03015 0.03510 0.03501 0.02813 0.03914 298,692 270,982 2 4,9 530 1,4 344,622 300,111 26 31*7075 8,25~~;3579~ 271,154 265,5 March August Sept. ZOOZ/Z L/Z L ZOOZ/ZZ/1.10 ZOOZ/1/01. ZOOZ/17/6 ZOOZ/9/8 ZOOZ/OE/Z 200082/9 ZOOZ/* 1/9 ZOOZ/0 L/17 100184/8 ZOOZ/8/Z 00 91- LL 00 21 00 *L 00 03 00*6 L Exhibit 2 PRPA Test Year Ended Dec 3r 31. 2001 81 -,S TOWN OF EST PRPA PURCHAS estcos2001.xls Demand: ver Credit e of Peak Billing KW Mod pesellolnd Vclhld 1/9/2003 m u) M o M- 00 lo c) - O- c)Â© com h L M 09 00 N U') 4- r- 91- r ~ O - 0 1.0 1~ CI O I '01 00. N â‚¬9 n Gl hoo 4- (9 N. CD h w 100 10. 6 85 5%*013*@RE@*09% E 3 *8(49Â¢44 N 45424-m.,93- 9-8-to-:8-Â¢9* &00â€ž 10 10 Â©-AX<E N CNI =r 10 U) N N r N CD N N C) 5- O 3 1~ t.O LO CNI N C) CO O) 4Â·CNICDÂ¢9000) (9 N UD-(0 0 ..5.RRRE-15 E-:1 *6 ~ &2 1121*32 C) 00Lf-)MONMNCOM<DO A 0010 00 . CD i 00 m 0 ~Â· 0091Â· 3 N Â®,-*Mt:*ung-Ni# 4 :2-8-Sig-8 422<9246â„¢24&24% Cal,O "m Q .- Cl at - cD 5- Mhq r " ...1 - (N 3%35%&8220**EmE*000 m&GRREÂ§gEzg%ggg gmcvt A* 0- r-I= $24~-*~-*~ *-MOUDeD 0 h {D- 22 3-0*maw=Neunmmp=& 1- 01 Al =25 3 3 92%28ZRSÂ°00 9!EZREggg&'mtsy,WRS 0 252 -22%3% 10 =lu-> 10 (r-"11 9 .1 b h. h 4. CO. 0. UD N '~ 00 0 00 - to (D (9 - m SURIkE E Â© cy MINg- 02- il-";2-RS- 7-9% qN g 1 -1 41 &<Â°*922Â® CO 09 0 coâ€¢-CNI MOMÂ©-cn 644"RERER&Â§295&1mo 00 -Ri"Re'Â§Â§*0% AMAÂ¥* 2*9*%5*eigew.~MNÂ®.p CON r eDo 2.9-k Â® ..N:82 64 B ER*250*mai*322Â§%493 22WZ&39!WERSR:82:89 10 10 00-00000*NÂ©000Â©00 22 Ng & .0 00,0-4-1--ggedN- Nuritai-,4 - r - -â„¢.55 B-Â°os"c.* 8 0 3*3 0- 0-2 1%%Â§286-62,3 *@1 1 w &; RÂ° AggE-%22 0 2522 83.33Cy Z.45Â® RIA I e - M m . --â„¢Mag >-hoo,9*RI moo m CO -r LCD ID Z 10 Â© ce w el * u> o tr> O 0 co tr) C~ . c> CN 33Â°35uREWSEÂ®&2222 *@*EME'wagEE@*Em Am ~ Ki 2- --â€¢--câ€¢icid 446*Eg ('i Câ‚¬4â€¢--devie IN 5- . r . 4 13 O 0 CDO->CO *C) NÂ© IN LOUD NO-M O M I 0-) A <00 h C) d) *CD Â®A 4- 61 I â€¢- 00 *8.2-E.ggagg!8.89 A-V-N.Qh 41 h n (9 1 th Â© 4 E - 00. aD. 0 41 H O â€¢--comc> 00)0(DIA . 91. 1- CD -hoo N. 1 - 1 0 r w O 0 0 - U) (% 82'Â§18;3Â§*BEE@FE@Â§ 28}2826?848*53*22 @2~22*9 . 1.0 LONO e - 1- N N. 1- M. 9 r 1. n al 1 00 4-45 ----MER -- UD If-) f 01-<90000000000)hrIDIOO GBEE@fRRZEERIMS!<E 8%82:18Â¥2 2 00 89622& NCOOMN 4.--eâ‚¬g-~ 00 4 e mt- 4 M Â« â€¢ri Â©NN 10 10 â‚¬ - 9- O 00 N - r (9 * 00 * O r- 91Â· com ~12.21 38Â©0&5831.9.2.20Â§ 0-8/6%@@@03 *00-580 M ,- cO - d â„¢ 6 9 4 4 64 *10-h-00 -NWS* E-Â©ANAN .- @2% m.3-54%@26}gi}*001Â§ E-9-M-gME@**ZEE~REE NE 9 3 44.82 ANg=*EgrwN- -4-Nht-(9 - â€ž 4. * - <0 A c) O lf) C) r Lf) C') C) ID 10 0 M co to A ON,-(N-Co- m hc)* el NOCNN -LY n-N cDC)(IC) 4--ne'Â£111- 99650!E@@525@31@5 K ER- M E- CNNY*8 -W-ggw-0*NEM MuiYer-N p - Â© 0 & r. I. N Emem=men@=Gamumism 552/2 38554% .2222 C)OrG)-IN 9-2- 4 9 UN. 46 N r. p f-00Â®.Am B C) M m NCD-(90% *1000 1-0 NONÂ» - 1 O r O â€¢- O 0 0 N CO N 00 Lo O O â€ž*812-2-29128-Nt?5*:1%3-R E,Re- g.2- Ang@EMRRE- 2-8-2 = St= â„¢ - = WN-7 A M MCDâ€ž-â€žN p - 22 22828**a~a - 2 ~Em*25BmE=WWBEB32 Ral R E-15 5-* * * E G R E 5 5-5 CD N O * 4-04.-w-evi r r - r C* N CD M N P â€ž CON .., * co 0> C- E g OB gE E & 1188 *% 8 2%00 89 8 1- 1- - A -m g -* M 2* * ZE ~ PE m 2 03 3* E E EE EE 1 2 1 2 IR- 2 â‚¬ **&1182 =* 11-2259 *CE 2 2 a 22 i ZZ, 0200.00 3&3358%~~E@22 & 2%222@22&&2&&333 Rate Class February March April May june July August Se Winter Summer Total Wi t r Total New Winter/Summer Residential (2) 040 Â· 267,8 241,929 1 234,169 203,355 1 6,048 2,813,677 184 26 8' E 036 Residential 161,87 163 1 59 500 15 53 65,059 24,168 78,028 1 61-S 142,98 152 93 1 Residential Demand (3) 9 Calendar year 2001 1,0 00 Residential O Town of Estes Park Calculation of Proposed 2003 and 2004 Rates Residential Residential Gen. Service Small Comm. Gen. Service Total Besidaolial Demand IM Emall IQ[:1 Large Book Revenues: Winter 4,987,383 1,987,144 538,012 120,344 1,117,282 6,049 1,060,217 Summer 2,241,793 826.533 154.835 36103 59il-53 2.241 Ii9.Z18 Total 7,229,176 2,813,677 692,847 156,447 1,711,436 7,290 1,619,934 Revenue Increase 905851 Proposed Percent 0.15 0.21099 0.17 0.0842 0.13 0.0842 Revenues 905,510 422,051 146,184 26,596 144,103 948 136,398 2003 Percent 0.0724 0.1110 0.0817 0.0412 0.0630 0.0412 2004 Percent 0.0724 0.0900 0.0817 0.0412 0.0630 0.0412 Billing Units: Number of Bills 80,820 5,876 2,002 16,809 96 936 New Winter 3,925 1,334 64 Summer 1,951 668 32 Kwh On Peak 1,016,357 45,175 Off Peak 2,676,173 104,982 Total 3,842,687 3,692,530 150,157 On Peak New Winter 764,192 29,642 Off Peak New Winter 2,137,743 79,026 New Winter 8,318,941 New Summer 2,424,687 790,595 41,489 Total 10,743,628 3,692,530 150,157 Winter 28,690,198 8,318,941 15,033,878 , 19,843,206 Summer 11,718,567 2,424,687 8,033,443 10,520,325 Total 112,737,634 40,408,765 10,743,628 0 23,067,321 0 30,363,531 KW Not Metered Not Metered Not Metered Not Metered Not Metered On Peak Off Peak Winter 32,135 52,252 Summer 27,962 27,720 Total 60,097 79,972 New Winter 41,218 New Summer 18,879 Total 60,097 Current Schedule: Monthly Customer Charge 3.00 3.00 3.00 7.25 7.25 0 Energy Rate 0.06359 0.03085 0 0.06892 0.02959 Winter On Peak 0.08 0.0867 Winter Off Peak 0.0255 0.0255 Summer On Peak 0.08 , Summer Off Peak 0.0255 Demand Winter On Peak 7.15 9.26 Winter Off Peak Summer On Peak 3.93 Summer Off Peak estratecall.xlsCalratesl/9/2003 Sheet 10 1 Town of Estes Park - Calculation of Proposed 2003 and 2004 Rates Residential Residential Gen. Servich Small Comm. Gen. Service Total Basidentia[ Demand IQQ Small IQD Large 2003 Proposed Schedule: (Rates shown in bold) Monthly Customer Charge 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.25 8.25 10 Energy Rate 0.066627 0.071981 0.030811 Winter On Peak ' 0.033603 0.080660 0.087772 Winter Off Peak 0.033603 0.028500 0.028500 Summer 0.066627 0.000000 0.000000 Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak Demand Winter On Peak 7.15 9.52 Winter Off Peak Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak Revenue Current Rates: 7,241,214 2,812,053 688,727 155,557 1,711,665 7,290 1,638,998 Cents/kWh 6.96 6.41 4.21 7.42 4.85 5.40 New Winter Season 593,871 0 0 Cents/kWh 7.14 0.00 0.00 New Summer Season 171,304 0 0 Cents/kWh 7.07 0.00 0.00 Revenues Proposed Rates: 7,686,677 3,015,591 765,176 168,261 1,782,270 7,749 1,706,605 7.46 7.12 4.56 7.73 5.16 5.62 Percent Increase 6.15% 7.24% 11.10% 8.17% 4.12% 6.30% 4.12% Residential Residential Gen. Service Small Comm. Gen. Service Total Residentia[ Demand IQQ Emall IQQ Laige 2004 Proposed Schedule: (Rates shown in bold) Monthly Customer Charge 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.25 8.25 10 Energy Rate 0.072028 0.075168 0.032081 Winter On Peak 0.036627 0.087597 0.092771 Winter Off Peak 0.036627 0.031000 0.031000 Summer 0.072028 0.000000 0.000000 Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak Demand Winter On Peak 7.89 9.92 Winter Off Peak Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak 2003 Revenues 7,686,677 3,015,591 765,176 168,261 1,782,270 7,749 1,706,605 Cents/kWh 7.46 7.12 4.56 7.73 5.16 5.62 New Winter Season 577,953 0 0 Cents/kWh 6.95 0.00 0.00 New Summer Season 184,401 0 0 Cents/kWh 7.61 0.00 0.00 Revenues Proposed Rates: 8,075,289 3,233,861 762,355 182,002 1,855,787 8,237 1,777,001 Cents/kWh 8.00 7.10 4.93 8.05 5.49 5.85 Percent Increase 5.06% 7.24% -0.37% 8.17% 4.12% 6.30% 4.12% 2003 and 2004 Increase Revenue Increases 834,074 421,808 73,628 26,445 144,122 948 138,004 Percent Increases 11.52% 15.00% 10.69% 17.00% 8.42% 13.00% 8.42% estratecall.xlsCalratesl/9/2003 Sheet 10 2 Town of Estes Park Calculation of Proposed 2003 and 2004 Rates Large Comm. Outdoor RMNP IQQ Municipat Lighia Residantial Emall.=Gen Largefe[L ' Book Revenues: Winter 2,980 122,329 677 935 15,592 16,822 Summer 3.845 &2.&Â£12 3&1 all 6,709 7.556 Total 6,825 171,778 1,019 1,245 22,301 24,378 Revenue Increase Proposed Percent 0.0842 0.128 0.45 0.15 0.0842 0.17 Revenues 575 21,988 458 187 1,878 4,144 2003 Percent 0.0412 0.0621 0.2042 0.0724 0.0412 0.0817 2004 Percent 0.0412 0.0621 0.2042 0.0724 0.0412 0.0817 Billing Units: Number of Bills 12 674 194 36 201 84 New Winter Summer Kwh On Peak 56,760 Off Peak 63,420 Total On Peak New Winter Off Peak New Winter New Winter New Summer Total Winter 1,967,975 34,850 411,749 546,520 , Summer 795,504 11,107 175,617 204,340 Total 120,180 2,763,479 43,860 45,957 587,366 750,860 KW Not Metered Not Metered Not Metered Not Metered On Peak 335 Off Peak 0 Winter 1,985 Summer : 1,046 Total 3,031 New Winter New Summer ~ Total Current Schedule: Monthly Customer Charge 5.25 3 7.25 0 Energy Rate 0.06216 0.02475 0.03558 0.01491 Winter On Peak 0.02959 Winter Off Peak 0.02444 Summer On Peak 0.02959 Summer Off Peak 0.02444 Demand Winter On Peak 10.70 4.13 Winter Off Peak 0.00 Summer On Peak 10.70 Summer Off Peak 0.00 estratecall.xlsCalrates'1/9/2003 Sheet 10 3 Town of Estes Park Calculation of Proposed 2003 and 2004 Rates Large Comm. Outdoor RMNP IQQ Municinal Ugilis BRsi@Iliial EmaU.ae[L La[ga.2[1. 2003 Proposed Schedule: (1 Monthly Customer Charge 12 6.32 4 7.25 10 Energy Rate 0.066018 0.025928 0.037150 0.016128 Winter On Peak 0.030811 Winter Off Peak 0.025448 Summer Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak Demand Winter On Peak 10.71 4.19 Winter Off Peak Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak Revenue Current Rates: 6,814 171,778 1,019 1,245 22,356 23,713 Cents/kWh 5.67 6.22 2.32 2.71 3.81 3.16 New Winter Season Cents/kWh New Summer Season Cents/kWh Revenues Proposed Rates: 7,095 182,441 1,226 1,336 23,278 25,650 5.90 6.60 2.80 2.91 3.96 3.42 Percent Increase 4.12% 6.21% 20.42% 7.24% 4.12% 8.17% Large Comm. Outdoor RMNP IQQ Municinal Ligbis Beaideolial Smal].aan. Large.Man. 2004 Proposed Schedule: (1 Monthly Customer Charge 12 7.61 4 7.25 10 Energy Rate 0.070116 0.028032 0.038785 0.017445 Winter On Peak 0.032081 Winter Off Peak 0.026498 Summer Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak Demand Winter On Peak 11.17 4.55 Winter Off Peak Summer On Peak Summer Off Peak 2003 Revenues 7,095 182,441 1,226 1,336 23,278 25,650 Cents/kWh 5.90 6.60 2.80 2.91 3.96 3.42 New Winter Season Cents/kWh New Summer Season Cents/1<Wh Revenues Proposed Rates: 7,388 193,765 1,477 1,432 24,238 27,745 Cents/kWh 6.15 7.01 3.37 3.12 4.13 3.70 Percent Increase 4.12% 6.21% 20.42% 7.24% 4.12% 8.17% 2003 and 2004 Increase Revenue Increases 574 21,988 458 187 1,882 4,031 Percentlncreases 8.42% 12.80% 45.00% 15.00% 8.42% 17.00% estratecal 1.xlsCalratesl/9/2003 Sheet 10 4 O 0 1 2 0 09 :22*23&8 EÂ°Zili282 8%*MMa EMÂ©*.Ma I H 0 tri '- 25 1.0 to - 4. 0 2 Cy y =r CD LOLD*00-9Â¢91.0 LO ID*Lf)*091Â· O * 0 0 C\l cD 1 0 1 **2 ~02*6 K :0 05 = 0 09 (6 1 = c<1 0) cv (9 0 00 M O 00 4- 0 0 CO 09 - h @g CD A 8 62 9 Qi"GCN* 0 41 91. 4. - 84&0 - g LO - 00>Nbecoo LOO Cy N bR 0 0) U) i>]EÂ£22 R 59Â®FLc\!c\! 10 8 J M A g N 9 g Nci C) 9- 00 N CD 2 0 N 000 co L.0 0 m 0 0 C) CO O N Q! M g cri p CE 10 0 h (9 \2 CDC\1 WEAgERm 6Â°91 -ec,)13)00) 00 N h WLOO).*Ui 9~* 0 84 d %3Â§Â§& 6% 55 3 l~ US â€ž "- C\' M ed 2 6 * 0 4 - 9 r 5 4 1 CD co iD CDC)~PCOLD t.0 m c> 4Kcvcul- 91-91-00>h cd N d 3*903Â£39 CorD 1< 2 2 4 91' 00 "00 0 K ' Â£38 LOO bR 91- CD LO Qtr)mbfOON .88 2*208 p to - 10 00 C) 1 0 0) 2 %23 2Â§32,â„¢co 0 w (D ;154 04 cCS 4- 00 LO Â· Â£*R in~ ~o33 LO@gaggE g :8 2 2 2Â£32 .r CO 0 0 CO 0 LO vhcuoth - 0 dc\1 A 00 H * d K T CD O U CO 911 06 "~ 10 288%42 - C) Le 6 U) oc) 10 If) 00 0 ~2 (\1- Lf) Lf) CO (0 10 C) 1- O 91- 0 0 LO 00 cO CO C) 06 CD e - p 0) CD- A 4. h 26222Â§%23 4 - CD h d N al W ed .1- 000.320 ID 0 C\| CO 32 - A Lo O Culf.m A 0 00 0 0 00 10 \2 h 00 0 & 0 LON C\1 *_ U) h oc\!*CocÂ¥)102-CD 4-co- LD LOGS 09 M O 10051=UNK Loo-Â®cridGEK LO LD Â· - 6 CD " Lfi Cul N . (D S E C E 2 3 5 % 0 0 15 i o 2 CD E m P 0 - 0) 0 8 2 # 4 0 0=go 0 C 0 -C E e P O .C v fe-Â¤O.g EU E E*c EO O LO CD OLO 0 CO ia@ZA-Eig--3 8 *2& 8.m ma~-22 5 00 .9* 3 2 5-8 -a Ng**)2 (DE .C -- .Â¤=LLÂ·=.c h BBE 0 1.- - 0- 0 0- . bÂ£ .bÂ¢ 0 0- 0- 0 2 M O 0- 0- 0 0- 0 2 0 1 1 0 0- 0- a m estcomp2003 Minimum 500 , 600 1000 2000 Current $ 12.54 22.08 41.15 66.59 130.18 7.07 roposed Cents 6.86 Proposed $ 13.99 23.99 43.98 70.63 1 OELL 0883 +099 1 92'Et 6.85% 88' L L 0+ 098Â£ 9*ZE ZL 1 2745 56+ L.83 e5ue4 93' Lf 0008 000L Typical Bills Current and Proposed 2003 Rates 83.79 161.15 89.81 167.69 906 MM/siu o pesodoid TOWN OF ESTES PARK SIX Ldwoolse Residential esodcud esodo Residential D M>l/slueo pesodoi CO LO h 4.- \2 to C) 091. OON C)be 6 9 1 0600:06 CU h h 9 Sgkh ho~0' 4 26 N 1 Â¥- 0 (\1 (D '000000)(D be 0492 OC\IC\ICON<De 90-511<06 0 0 CD N 91- 0 0 hiP<00 W h .00 (086* 00 U K 0 53 N O US 05 U Lri 32 8 g 3*1 3653 g crs K 4 W, 0 8 K %02 58 91Â·00(90*moo d#223*32 If)(DU~ 1 2=00@GE=n Â§ yog|E N 00 N 00 (9 1 W W e LO 32 .- to 091-00* adOON. , 4 Ed 1 el - P r N- 0 LO LD â‚¬ O 00000 CM C\! b O O N X'. CO 0 Be hhoo Lod-(9.62 6 Â®K CD U 2 0 .2 -3Â£ 2 9 0 2 0 06 CO # LD 00 3EE2e:8f 0-00= EwcO -0 0 0 5 12 g 5 8 5-3-E-2 ESPEEE *C**0200 -= 0- C 0 2 0-2 2 3~02~02 y O -0 -1Â£ O 1 0- a bstcompl. p2003 Minimum 100 1000 1400 2000 2500 5000 14.14 27.93 76.17 103.74 145.09 179.55 351.85 28.84 79.23 108.02 187.20 367.16 +8'0 L LEE â‚¬3-8 99.9 9*' L L .99.8 AAM/slueo pesRdoid 4.135/ 1000 2000 2000 Sheet 12 Typical Bills Current and Proposed 2003 Rates TOWN OF ESTES PARK 34.35 6.56% 11 Commercial posed Cents/kWh Small Commercial TOD 28.57 92.52 107.21 0 0 0 0 N 12 4 es 2 d u; 05 cojEcrip O 0~0 C.Nk h 5!gh LO t 4- 4 CD O CD 10 0 O 09 m N O (9 0 h * ~ crs 2 câ‚¬ CÂ¥5 0 LO NÂ· O 0 NI C) â€¢r- K@ ~ ~ ~ W W 1 CO 6 03 h 4 â‚¬ c\' o LOCD Looo O 632 9 8- h (c! c\IN h CD 3 A 05 e ~ w o N C) CO LO p N co d a dd 0 C.) 22 N N f 0 0 co ID M 0 0 0 822 LO %- Â°C! CD = 0 CU N co d h e K 6 4 co d d " - 12 0 A O * O \2 0 1 1% 0 0 LOCOLOO * 2 5 2 =i &8 :2 :2.52 -c, 0 (D 0 0 00 CD 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0- 14 O CU <0 U (9 CO 0 0 NO NO C) 0 E CO C> 0 0 CO 00 00 0 - CD -decuod d E I M (CS E U) (D 90 2 @r 0 N. 00 4 C E A 64-00=-O 66 -O 0 C ev 5 ~.IM C LU E *20 g 2*~EE*P AW C 53 E = 2 8-BEÂ° 0 E 03 =E t. G) 2%32221 ~= odr0-Â¤0- d ESS#2@ g &0- 6- COLLIWO)-'2 m J .- f J 0 m Em 060 co ~. estcomp2003 pesodoid luejino pesodokÂ£~0~woo Jeu~~73 pesodoid lue-uno lueuno pesodoid luel,no 30990'0 9 13900 L LBOSOO 696300 L86 1100 0 09Â£Â£0 98080.0 2 9Â£90-0 led!0!unIN .WWOO IleLUS pugulea lequepiseu 35 35 75 75 200 200 10220 12775 15330 21900 27375 32850 58400 73000 Ei 11.13 626.51 777.71 1,342.52 1,504.53 1,666.53 1,398.76 1,5 1,736.14 62-21 EL S 1000 2000 5000 62.16 124.32 310.80 66.02 1 330.09 Typical Bills Current and Proposed 2003 Rates 229990 98300 99800 820.0 99800 aol le!018UILUOO Ilellts aol le!luel)!sel pesodold e odoid lueiino EZZZ80'0 2980'0 TOWN OF ESTES PARK sIX' kdwooise Jell]own Large Commercial mmer Energy Jeluols 8 32 06 R 3 co 8232 4 & r 18 J ~ * 5Â£:6~ E . W E K N (0 4 Lo Lri N r e -cd to r Â· 00 AN Al 1 - (0 4 eggkls 41 0 mo O - 9 Â°- N N .00 CDr- \2 0 to LO * 91- .9 0 00 91-00 (0 10 0(0(D-Osh U) r g 00 00(DSOON r N 01 0 1 K 06 9.- 0 h . 03 R#%29 O 0 N .2 00 1 0 0 N 0 32 1 0000 10 00 h~ iae r. h M R &1 1 2 0 9- p 28 co CD 9 0 -- ~ -= 0! 01 CO CÂ¥) (C! 10 If) 4 e 4- 9 O tO N 2 0 h LO * O 0 0 2 co (D gme.&60%. 8 W g dER* 4 6 CD CO dA o A p O - f C\10 0 004.0 22Â£ S 32 CO O o LD 00 #co 00. 06 R # d Lo ~ 4- Lri 2% 3. g 000 2 00 91. 4-000991Â· 91-h co N (9 00 698** .O LO a) 0 * 0 2 1- h LO CO (9 r 10 @ E ~ 2 2 R :8 32 Lo Le 00 K- N OR Â· W h cri W - N 1- ONO) M 40 1 N O 1- '- cd a) - tÂ· to 00)(0 000 10 If) 00 CD 62 0) C\1 040 LougagER 262% NON (R c\! 9-CDO)-C>to 06 05 .- N w cD K Â¥ O 06 Â®00(YOON 1.0 h ..C\1 CO 00320 LO O cv C) 32 00 10 O N N 32 0 - OODOOCON 0 co 0 LON LO 10 0 0 OC\191-(DC,)911 15}- to (0 tri Cr) Er Cul N U),6 4 0 06 to 06 4 LO 00 LO d - CO crS od % CD 0 0 m 0 . LO CO e h cO CO K - 00 ID LD CO O O co N cD =r to 10 10 00 to ID - - M. A. C) -h .r- CONd- 0 co 00 0= 2 & -E %) & .2 -r -0 C& 662 g o '68 -C 02 c CO Â·r- E Z CO 64= C - m 2 0 evo=P 00 epor evo 2 v fY-Â£ 2 E 2 2 0 31 f EnEE -3- aga5~0 9 - c g * 2 & & 3 E-6 8 2 - - 50 : Ch, 2L =0-== 2 9...2 *=2Â®02 852&12Â®0 - -= 525-5- RC*R =2 0 Ion_o-no_ 0 2 2 0 0- 0- 0 ME00-0-ao -kO-*MOO-O-0 p2004 Minimum 2000 34.80 130.18 13.66 17.88 7.40 6405 10220 83.79 161.15 450.84 568.54 183.78 ZZ .75 655.48 ange 22.63 28.96 38.40 86.94 01201 90+'9 099Â£ 08Â£+ 9*ZE 099L *899* BE'692 L0Z6 ~- Â£991~L 988 L L 69'Z9 000* 000* 0003 0008 0001 000K 226 L +099 L 29.t9 99.92 99'6 LE NO 82.2 K L 69'96 28. Lâ‚¬ %88.17 L ,+0 9 L %2-9 L %89 9 L 8* 81 %0t/6 L %29 LE eS e o Jueo e 66'ZE Lt' â‚¬/ L 80-99 Zf.ap Propbsed Cents/kW 11.74 11.14 6.48 10.97 LE:.293 EL'ZOE 98.Â£2 L 9L'OLL %98.8 %39 29 56*ZE9 39'EL eBu 1460 1650 2745 2237 EL 10049 LL.*L 60'8 LL.9 to*9 989 081 L9'OK 062 AAM/slues pesodoid Typical Bills Current and Proposed 2004 Rates 20.71% 1 1620[Pl 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 16.87% 14.04% 1 Demand Winter Residential Demand Summer Ldulooise Residential 1 1 My/Slueo eoo 4 aol lequep!Sebl 01 C) y * co cÂ·SECK R 06 M Emem 2 0 - 3}2.00 00000Â®22 Di 0 K .- CO - 2 5 400 100 9 06 06 v 00 (\1 06 4Â£@4 N N cD 00 co C.9 32 0 h 91-00(90 -00(ue 43 9 11.00 - " CD ti M 0000.32NCO 00000 O 0) 00 y_ CO O) 0 (\1 00 Al CD 1< as h W ai *dcuh C\1 N Â· O 4- A \2 ) h 091-0010 O - h Â° CO N -41*04 2 62222 9- CO CO 32 g 0000Oholmo OC\191-(01.091-0000 go Loo-(906Nfeci O â„¢ M cri 2 0 13 0 9 0 2 .2 0 0 0 CO 0 0 (ID 00 0 00 01- Ohoclo,r:c) h 0 E E 3 3 0 1 ee= i CD 10 evo.C EmiEQ-Q-fevO E *EO 050[=-a)- =25@E 1-600 5 8 g 3%0=non O 0- O- a 3200 %@3@@52Â£21 estcomp2004 Minimum 1000 1400 2000 2500 5000 7.25 76.17 103.74 145.09 179.55 351.85 1000 2000 2000 4000 4000 1440 2400 49.89 92.52 107.21 207.17 56.55 104.84 119.6723~Z Le.EE '9.88 9+EL ZE.EL Â£29 99.9 988 89-6 66'9 266 8ZZ 990 L 981 80'EL M>l/slu ;~Pqe9sodoi 12.50 7.25 112.49 11.99% 13.35% 11.76% 13.32% 11.62% El S 0.28 0.4 Typical Bills Current and Proposed 2004 Rates TOWN OF ESTES PARK Commercial estcompl.xls roposed Cents/kWh CO 0 0 O 0 0 to 4- CD N o h Q K E- 00 88 00 (D â‚¬ CO O O 0 10 00 ~ CO LD d K w .-LO O 0 + W cq 00- W .- r-- 2 maggE *g Rm 4(4*65,0 O 0 g N OCD+ 9 O w., ,_ ~ 21 t.0 000 9-0 00 4 CO h ~2Â£0 %0 ~ Â§ 2Â£*~. 000hh h M h YJ 0 0 O 4- 1 0 0 LO -o 00 N CD CV Lfi 4 K 8 6 0 Â£*R , e* 0 Ocurfor 0 (9 00 OC\100000 Cl co (D - d K co O A N E 0 0 - 0 - & 902 - 33 2 0 = 00 2 0 0 LO LO 00 CJ h LO Â¢9 LOCD O LO 0 m e Od CD 10 M . Gil 0, - o t O Lo LO OÂ·Â· CO 0 (10 E â‚¬eg & 0 2. C 0 LU E ev evo.3-0 W Ill CC 6- a) 0 -M 1- E 0 M 9 - 3. %2 9~ E >Â® c@E E-% g 2 o OE m = E 8--22 a. E - %2*,EM' 2%8Â£Â®82 ~3~5Ek@2 4 dsBg# 2 -c E g. O -E a. m m p2004 pesodoid luelin0 pesodoid lue.uno pesoded lue]Jno pesodoid lued.Ino PesodoJCI luenno ELOZOO 9LE900 L80880'0 696300 89EZ0'0 868900 Â£39980.0 980â‚¬00 830320'0 led!0!unvy WU,00 9619-1 'LUU]00110LUS pUBLUea le!luepisel 35 35 75 75 200 200 200 10220 12775 15330 21900 27375 32850 58400 73000 87600 626.51 702.11 777.71 1,342.52 3,580.06 tu 4,444.08 64.92 71.29 114.05 323.84 360.21 Proposed Cents/kW 6.65 5.94 5.48 0L 366 936 685.07 767.03 1,456.57 3 7.53 4 4,804.30 8.50% 8.07% 8.11% EL leews 2000 5000 62.16 124.32 310.80 Typical Bills Current and Proposed 2004 Rates 17.53 140.23 P rent 12.80% 1 12.80% 15.91 7.01 920Ezo'o 001 le!010UILLIOO IleWS aol le!;uepisebl LZLE60'0 2980'0 Z69ZB00 00 ifleue TOWN OF ESTES PARK sodold lue]Jno pesoded lue-Ijns 99200 9930'0 l.dulooise POWERPOINT SLIDES FOR PRESENTATION DURING RAT E HEARING, JANUARY 14 TH PREPARED BY MAX KIBURZ, RATE CONSULTANT. Note: Page 14 is a new summary sheet following the Light and Power Committee Meeting January 9th r- 001.4 =th : M ; hl - 0 --1 .-4 C/DI -1 en Ul 00 VD 00 h ul M - h 001 - 0 - en M 01 00 N â‚¬ DO el thi -4 1> t> e V~) Ch Mi VD col O -1 u r 1 91- h m en =r en 21 t..0 - 00 -J aml Ch ~01 M ..+ E-- 001 - C Ch Cr) cl 00 N thi O 00 en N - r- 01 0-0 21 en, u. -1 0 011-1 =1- r e en n ch ~0 00 3 A Â· (11) . h el /0 .+ 7 en 11 0;81 91 Â£ R A Â© R 53 tEe 1 1 0 00 . M e %01 01 h Cl =f C M C I =f 00 04 1 - M h â‚¬ or re (23 O [hi =r co Vj- 01 04 â€¢Al r- =1- 001 n M U f % .. U Â·f b 66 -3.3 61 ad R J#w 22 + 1&8 al) -ilim.Mi~/31~023~,89 5.20 f i i & 1 -= 349- 8 E n er >U - O 0010 - -Per Adjusted With 2003 With 2004 8,523 FIR'Â£ FIS'Â£ 9IB'Â£ 938'Â£ ISI'I I8I'I ~~'I IM %99ZI- %Lf'g- Estes Park Light Electric Rate Revenue Requ ($000) Books Adjustment so}Epossv pue zinq!N H W EOOZ/6/I sosuodxa Â£0Â£ 00!A.I 8Â£I'8 00!A-IOS JO }S 96Â£- enues From Sales er Revenue Credits ments B 4 .% 0 u.6 1 â€žC) S8 (3 Estes Park Light and Power osts related to providing a system capable of meeting the d demand of all classes of service. â€¢ Energy - Costs incurred to provide the actual purchase of energy. â€¢ Customer - Costs directly related to the number of customers and to Classification providing connection, metering and billing. 3 0 U .9 0 iIi < Estes Park Light and Power â€¢ Purchased Demand - Coincident Demand less RMNP â€¢ Purchased Energy - Energy less RMNP â€¢ Other Demand - Non Coincident Demand with RMNP 11ocation Facto â€¢ Other Energy- Energy including RMNP sII!EI Jo loqu[nN polÂ®!01 - JOUIolsno â€¢ =r NO)N O Z-QDNG)â€¢-NLO 1< cd zo 4 cd N CD CE N O)1000-000â„¢NON C.4 1 .-0 O - Co r- C) A & 00 00 0 0 CD 10- 0 CD W 0 (D a)â„¢rÂ·- r.0 (,J Cd r--- r-=- 00 CD t- 7- 1- M 00 CD 1- r- 0 0 1- - E co 01 a. .6 0 0- E v Z 0 0 352 222 joof Revenue Expen s Deficit Percent Estes Park Light and Power Electric Rate Study CostofSe rvi~~;dy Summary sidential 2,967 identiai Demand 736 166 Small Commercial 1,791 09 Â£ /9'8 909'Z I ejol aol le!OJel.UUJO~ Ilel.US le!0Jel.UlllO0 86181 aol le!01elul.LI00 86Jel 6u!146!I eeje Jo â„¢ 0 0 Ft OLD 06 r- N OGIN-(\14-(\IN 044(601<406 . g R 0 #P 7 C M ,% i (\1 or) N (\1 0 4- c) 10 00 0 00 N rt 3 4- 0 NONOr-Or-00ONT-001.0 0 0 .*.52 05 10 0 Â·4 d e N ai i< 06 05 N 35 162@8â€žecv 1- r-XN N. -8 13 O 0 v 4 O - >4 >4 CO (0 0 0 (D (D CO OEE 1= 1= co 0.76 -m E -a g (1) .23 .0 .23 .23 0 1% 5 m : b CO .2, g 0,-EEEE . la-m & 32&%%5mf~&~ 5@0000 Â¤-O 01 (D :23 0 0- & fl u,-2 co coc')2)EvZL Z E INEEmm=41555$< Of 05 0 U) Jjj005050(IM - Residential 7.24 7.24 15.00 11.10 9.00 21.10 8.17 8.17 17.00 4.12 4.12 8.42 00.Â£ L 0Â£ *9 Et.Z EL 17 E'.8 EL + 08-EL LE 9 00.94 6u!146!1 00 9 L 411 2003 2004 Total (%) Estes Park Light and Power Proposed Rates EL.* le!0]el.Ul.LI L L.8 le!0]al.Ul,UO3 Electric Rate U]81Sks Â£0 (1) 4 1 0 ta O 0 @05 m m e LUOg â€¢ AÂ®.C rri ~ (DE A 285 t 82*E 2 OOG 2 O .0 f O 01 06 0 0 12 45 5; 55 7~ in i Ji~ 1r il er im i .1~ 1 il li 01<Â®<4)0 2< CO<(OEm /<-m<-mca %88 1 522 1 8 2 8 0 0 -Peak or Off-Peak Winter Summer Demand Demand eto|a~r~k~ential customers owgr 15,000 kWh $3.00 $0.030850 $7.15 $3.93 91.Â£$ 09Â£90.0$ 00.9$ LIAAM 000'9 L 36,\0 SJoll101Sno le! Juel)!sek lie o; elqe'!BA Â£001 682$ â‚¬99Â£00$ 00 9$ 099100$ 00080'0$ 00.Â£$ e6ejois *fiJaue Bu!sn SJewols n le!luep!sal lie oj el 099200$ 990800$ 00 9$ 85elois Afileue Buisn sieuloisno le! juep!sej ile ojeiq â‚¬002 OOLâ‚¬0'0$ 09Â£900$ 009$ 0Â£Â£90'0$ 966L00$ 009$ 46nOJ4; Jequieldes) BJeluoisno Ie! luep!sej lie m elqel!.BAV Â£002 Current and Proposed Residential Rates e to all residential customers and resident with $3.00 $0.06359 $4.00 $0.07203 0890 0$ â‚¬*980 -0$ 00 -9$ ewes 4002 Estes Park Light and Power ble to all residential customers and residential with $4.00 $0.06663 waq oupele 41!AA lequepisal pue Jeqwe~ 1~!J~842111:~al(pl~ Alienuue )lead-uo LIM)1 000'9 Jepun well eoeds oupe heat up to 25,000 kWh annually heat up to 20,000 kWh an Aea-Jo-elll!1 At}Jeua lenue (MEN) Aea-,0-er!10!Seg ADJellg le#Ueplsek' e Jehl le! luepasehi W esn Jeulluns (ludv leall eoeds o r.. 2 N 1. to e CD N N w Â®05 64 0 64 883 2 -2 #R (0 <N c,1 Rk 10 0) as CS as O - 14 0 te ,-,1- 2 88& Â£4 44 91 @Â§ M (N N (9 0 00 O 0 0 do O 0 64 64 64 64 44 61 00 N R EE . 9- 00 C) p 10 00 0 0 O N 8 8 i e m'* 2 Em * 88 8 88 3 M O 00 0 0 M 0 0 0 00 d do 0 do 04 Oulo@; 64 64 64 64 44 â‚¬4 44 0 0 64 V> E m 9 10 10 10 in W 88 88 WN -41 0 agg N N 01 8 64 64 6,> 64 1 00 64 0 O 2 20 :f - 1 01 60 3 M -2 1 (D 5E E s >.2 R .8 -3 5 CO 2, 2 & te i~ 1 gee i- 8 i 0 & 2 73 2 = 2 1 - 81 1 (0 U.C E 8 2*2 m *~*m= BNE fl < M 0 0 (0< a,CO CD i Â§Â§ i Â§Â§ Â§Â§ 0 N N 8 - CV d W N N N Summer OZ-01.$ OZ'out *Â»E eP 41!M Siewoleno le!0Jewwoo O; elqel.Imy Juauno 09920-0 902Â£0 Estes Park Light and Power $7.25 Electric Ra Current and Proposed Small Commercial le to all commercial cu Commercial Energy eulois,10 18!OJeUIWOO 01 81 Aea-pelu!1 lepieUIWOO 00 /0 ca) LO 25* 382 .r> to 'r 69 >â€¢ 4) 3 2 43 Co C.C Ul O te to (9 0 â€¢r- M LO <OWN h a O a) -Or- 10 00 1 0 N N (0 0 N N N p -- CDON 89 0 00 O 00 000 4, cO 00 0 00 000 C Â·C 0 44 64 te .4 Beete O W O 0 00 10 'O 00 LONT- 00 C,1 N < 00 0, NICD 4. 4,4 z 00 10 0 N m te Ve 0 te -- 440â‚¬4 0 -C - 0 te 000 . CD .E UJ C E 10 2Â£ 22 i CO 2 -ES 2 28 W EE co U) a> Ng=E" fi*er 60Â®Â® :mo=%Â®63 0 0 2 .ma. Â® SEE 2&E EE 22EEE =- EME 0 (0 CO 0>.00" = 5 u.1 U) Co ac < co m v U) co .<:Ezzz i< O< *<EZ - 1 1 Ze Z @0 Z 00 0 0 00 0 0 tgo -00 ('9 CD Â® - N N N M 6 cy cy 6~ N 1: n-Peak or Off-Peak W inter Summer EL.,$ El.,$ MOO23 01 etqelleA Ble]J nO 61.4$ 6/.4$ Â£002 stomer Demand harge Month /kV /kW h $/kW Current -1 ble~o Rock Mountain National Park administrative $7.25 $0.035580 2003 0.03715 0.03879 00920'0$ S.le woisno le!0] le!luepisal lie 01 Â£002 00920 0$ 4001 Estes Park Light and Power Current and Proposed Other Rates Electric Rate Study Current vailable to Rocky Mountain National Park residences which $3.00 $0. have an alternate source of poweravailable fordelivery to the ch have an alternate source of powe le~or delive to the Estes Park electric system w h JeMod Jo eolrIOS UJelle Ue @Ae 40!4 slunoooe eo 41!M Utelsks O!]loele >wed Sels Allep JOJ elq plinq pue 'Bu!146!1 Mied 'jeans led!0!Unw JOJ eiqeii 0-0$ snld eBJelloms pu!,A V 1 e u one 1211!J 9 PV eBJel dN IN RM NP Administrative Housing Park electric system A d m in istratlve 9 u.peeoxe spue Ipal Rate BullqOil eeiv JOOp; d Joopjno 5u!146!I JOJ elqel! 06,043,ns Ab,eua Pul Ch FaZEÂ»Acv*rÂ» -2 --8188&380&1290 3 31 9% E- 9 5 - ..4 rt- 26- R cO 0 00 N 2 88 g r- N# cv 3FF *-%~iQ Sigi r cy Â§ NE w Lora) RM~%82Â§Â§ % Cd N- 0- 1- 5 62'Wmammovapx cvi N (ci rÂ· 1<- asÂ· cd K < 3 @- 2 2 6@WK E r- C\' Fy ~~Cq tr-r K= â‚¬ 75 0 - 3.15 F OFF #255 F h E-: 9 + i 18 16 18 E :g=g=*85//32@9313 v v v - ii Â® 0 0 8 a Q- a P 73 Z Z Z 083 E 083 il Ad Jir ip :r~ 23 21 CE CE ~fq' Increase Proposed 203,710 2~8,459 Estes Park Light and Power Electric Rate Study Dollar Impact of Proposed Rates OO,trl O/90\ 100, RAA@ CR g== *j - B 0 N 00\CS .444â€žW.0-40 -)40*r-12" o OM'.0, n oÂ® H e. Urn en o-50 5 0 O,ids 200*66 go<;Uger;~C; g $ t h Â· -:SU4- 22NG kt M Z Ar}ON-*C,B 000 00 "MI M n O W B An M M 2022 oN NGO o f * 4Mr-- 00 W 4 X W C< =94&0 @d=Z*t- ./ M=geri- NO - - W ZESS _Beamis x52*WIS =Â£29Gic,5 M ot-NeD O M O O W M & CO 91Â· N -130'orl M N *0 - C.2 ..W N Le â‚¬9 Q An v-1 rn 00 d, 40 10 Â©\Pilr, 00Â©OON mI. M = - 4- Ch 4 * â€¢-3 1 Re el 00 ONOMM W en t-NNT- r-4*go't. t.--w 20-15& BE r. -M.. Z5M. Ap + O M %65*z tri 0 â€¢44Â· f Ch h 4.001Wf 9 2 0% O - - -000,4 00! 29-00 3 Â§:W 2 -- .0 00 /â‚¬9* 00 M W "Wâ€¢04g W Cl 10Â©ON-fNâ€¢n .400,00.00,- 0 00 00 W 0 1 " 00 r m 00 0 0 - WWN+V>O ONOONT--0 MW Â¢.1 + Ch - 0,-~OW 4- b Fi 0 d <720 ~~*4Q -WS-M Ch 0 J 'Â°ng@atug gdgg32 vifoot-49- 0 " 00 M 00 M C, - OÂ©C\Â© ON B G U Z 4 r< . 0 4* W G w h \6 n w . - WN CO o \2 0 MONâ‚¬9&-t- trlecVn~Orne- 0&10 â€¢r) h N 0- M h .0 0 Q Â©\ 0 < ~ren- - 0, M Â¢19 0 v)442â‚¬Nt< Ir; - M V - â‚¬1 0 0 0 00 0 C 00 0 = 64,2 =0 64.150 O U +0 Ch rn NOO . dooorn. 00 W 2.00 24.2 00 00 r- O.. 7 8 -ZER= -YEAZ -3 8,02-1 E j * ,~ M Ad U BIA O 4 . M AA O A. A Q A U.640*20Â¢11Â¢11 V1 C 00 0 Reou -54 .54 C s â‚¬A E,Â§96 ~42~6Zz t.c A.=14 M O. 5,9,512 ..Mise:'22 -6,Â©**32 04 04 Percent Change 15.37 11.61% 5.6 % 1650 1 220 68.54 598.64 5;10;>t %8*'05 0I Ot'I :d 2 55.92 *48 ~'9 ~ 6 8*6 8Â£'10 Hmveluoo posodoid ET 7 36'L *BE'II %L 5' Â£ I oilu 843 lu 001 0 Minimum 150 500 750 Proposed$ 12* 2208 34.80 41 15 50.69 53.97 5:7Â£91 Residential Monthly Bill Comparison Using 2003 Rates Estes Park Light and Power P Electric Rate Study 000I 1 a~ Proposed nts /kW h 11.66 3 09â‚¬ OE LI'E osuetio IBHOG SEEZ 4 MD!/ 51 sidentialDÂ©mand Whter 101UU.ns pulnuoalimUOP.!s I[MY' SA Residential 6 R02.2. gâ‚¬g*45CR ~ uM.;Cr# N 9 4 4 * 06 M 06 <Rrn E Ag:2* 8 06 0010Â£31Â© M g % R i b 01Â©0500 ~ M. b t. 1- EZZEr:en 21 2 5 h M â‚¬9 =r 5 0 + M 4 4 ec\-\0â‚¬9%0 00 Â©Â©(991-40 g~nx 6 0 - ~ 2 2 ~' EANS A - =r .her)- er,en 082 91-00-t-*WON 6222B%,2 222=Â£<8 M Y t- g * m 1 $ M --V) M w. r.1 7 48 2.2 g g 2 nr 50)09 #O ON 8 râ€¢~ h R d M g R 1 4,1 W 2~4 ~ V. 3%28*ya R M o enm 4-W WS 2 rf; â‚¬.4 - g #0 O 22â‚¬9- 5 * 8 Mi ~0 - m M le â‚¬9 Z : A 9 9 1 1 22 4 0 Ch Mt- r' ~0 *4 0.-10 - M Â©91Â·CO a M ME M 0 10'h 06Â©0 09 4 ~0 - u 1 "r â€¢r; -- Â¢40 _z m #0 r- =r AR@22 ggis 0 R R RÂ° 00 \P h * m ec 01 VS -- 01*\PN=r R an A 0 0 p-4 pl G r< g d M d - M Oct N 00 2 5: CE g â‚¬9 0 & 9 t- - U .n N f N 0, . ON 46 0 3 114 ? 33 m â‚¬N M -2 -16 -4 g' 2 N E E -0;Z :8 MZ01/~ 9 -1011 EZE"g O EL 2 0 00 0 Â·e . 2 0 . = O 4, & O A E a Ha a ma 44 0 M &02 5 0 n M = 2 a A -~-=P,83=2.,o= 29* *=2002 aaÂ£=aÂ£ ED 01-5404404 fix,4 U A A 9 04 27.93 41.71 103.74 17935 351.85 II 0 1000 1400 2500 90'ISI 06'E9 08'LE 1000 1000 t 2000 4000 1120 0882 0*t I 6L'LLI 68'6t Lf.83 Â£988I 5Â£.*E 08'OE fs'OI 90'08~ IL'LLL I I'ZOL I f.939 Commercial Monthly Bill Comparison Using 2003 Rates 43.24 108.02 Estes Park Light and Power gLELE 006IE OEESI GLLEI Electric Rate Study 2.1 % 3.67% 1.53 8.65 80'OI t[AlÂ¥slu@J P *L'86E'I 0 5 9 ft' 9 4/cu g Small Commercial Minimum ommercialTOD @SUBHO , 0 g m RE RÂ£RR E W 4 40 40 t- Â©Oher).O*0 Mer-.petr) 01'1Â©93*W =*EE92= ng*22@m g=**2~*ma 0 â‚¬4 2 2*222;Z mgg~,vt- MoNN00,M cooee=IC, 00 -O% M 91 11 32 0 - M 00 0 ~cl r-***r<r- 0 0 4 5% M ~5226 -- @d=:32 4 M . 2 8nÂ¤2g& S*BEgEE 2g%*1gg %*%* 9&2Wgir- .SMEM- - -â‚¬.12- 2 222Â£88 -ZE.%031 :C@*RESS' 882% tr>tr>rÂ·10*hu C/D - A:z.,~00 Ma:309%00 ~~ge-â€¢ZFIr- O - -MZ -I N :5: 7 80=02* Con/Â£*X *of %5 %,5 M 01 3 8 4 04 92@OME S M --2 - M~AWft-M 8g2RRNÂ£8 - â‚¬4 4 8 4 0, 2 6 N b e., - 4. - -4 06 Z==-Ed/ 3 @2 832 =1' M 06 - .0 - SER -215%%8 (. 5* % &4 31 K ME~REME *gpg~ 00 Ch u M ~6 -4 â€¢,; d %ID els g WgRe =g .,~222~2= 00000 0 gr ON-W 4 4 00 4 00 . t< - I ~ ~~Z-06 1 1 5 642=0 64.2 1- ... -52 4 -fl os D 469022 64/6= =-20- SE O =~ N 00 09 50 EÂ° e O .8 -w .,, - 04 0 0 Â¤ O 0 4 2 bung 28â‚¬52/1 2 2 8/8/5,84 2/2/@11 ,% 1, -2AM:2 2 2 :51 o. 9839 130.1 1 2. 148~06 33.33% 20.71% 138 % 13.7 % 4 13 ZI 5~54 655.51 15.94% 15.30% SEZ I '8'50 + '>'EL36SI ~II - 0 86 5Â£09Z ~~ ~I ~LÂ£'9 I 9.9I RÂ°7 ~g IE Residential Monthly ill C omparison Using 2004 Rates 0002 Estes Park Light and Power Eg.,8 F t.6 Ot R 1268 8Â£'Et Minimum JOIUU.ns pUEUIOGI'lloopIS@ 1!M,1/gluoo posodoz HAAM~SlueD @ 9.9.gA R Â§Â§88Â£0.~I v % R od IN ~ m/*.*M 8 R Â°Â° *M- - 23 Vi *3 Â¥3%*35*53 8Â§8366% ~ :90!0 r. M 00 -RAEÂ¢N R@~ dM 4 2 I 2 ge Fi ~ /1. @OM*59Â£*g 888 9 2 - M M W (Nid m Ve. =80â„¢ eÂ·A el rn Â§5**RE Â§3** 633*%5 REEgeRE M - %=m- M *&,E -4-4 Â§592*16* , 52 SS{*ERM RREE*2* -Ber#Fjtoci - - g 8 m 51 r. 2*3~GM 4, g boo 06 .-1 = .. -- 2 Â·E 0 = I. 0-1 E N 8 *E*gRa Â§ 3 *Â§ RE g R 2 *Â§8!2 EF ir .4 8 ./ ix TS M 00 G;GEWS M g W = _ N d + d 44 E = -- Om (D B a g 288 ER Â§5%8222*Â® >Sim FrIS.~ R JM MAR. 15 -4 4 - I * 29 M VO T. 085*gm 8%%53% .r) v WrnNd 828â‚¬g2128 AR=84*8 M M 93-23 21#%22#d 829925;9Â£98 :518*82 t< SWO ar) 6- M 06 N =r (fie 8 B â€¢ri * 6 01 or, 0 . - 8 5 0< 68 N P â‚¬ E u % E u 21).E - m F F o 1 giqÂ¢% 1311Â§%,aff 1 1 018 ~Ej#ida~= ~EE~*EIEg~1%2 EL#Egia#= - Â£I IND 9054.8 Commercial Mont y Using 2004 Rates Estes Par and Power IiMM/14[IR) Posodal 0 ~0 =t- MI 2 00 Al 93 6%- gs- M *3 * IM 620 0% 091.00 - 00 45 E %19 '3- * 4 1 91 %2 ip El o . cK h - 38 M 2 2 :2 2 0 041 Nfl W 20 A W * M 00 *32 81 3 01 Cht>Cn=re eli M Do - 00 M .=OV 8 CGI h 13 g U E , 0 Cd 4-1 h M N * - 0 Al 041 09 0 91 W M R e 2 1 gIl CGI h I. 0 2 Cd 1 -1 2 2 2 2 R. a - 4 I 24 - F t. 1 % 4 1 1 - ::* G ./3 ~ 4 E ae#-16,4 41 9 8: : MI -6 0=ZA< 0& i Calendar Years 2002 20 2004 2005 2008 2011 Revenues from Sales 7,488 8,146 8,835 9,038 10,254 Purchased Power Rider 168 196 ~ Miscellaneous 207 222 4,013 4,112 4,378 4,480 4,787 5,093 EBE 66ET gÂ¥Â¥ 5~ J0UI01911O 9f0'6 8L9'L 9Z9'I Â· Â£55'I ZES'I ZOE'I OUIOOUI 00Â£ ZOE SI 99 690'I 0I0'I IZ6 ELE 99Â£ Â· Aoid[UI IEN SIO'I 989 EZE'Z 'AON 'In) 'A (Â£+L) (IZE) (Â£99) (69L'E) (Â£00,Â£) Â£90'I LEO'Z 00UBIEE[ 1 fI 7,740 8,348 9,210 10,045 10,672 s Park Light and Power Operating Revenue: w Bond Financing 10-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST PREPARED BY MAX KIBURZ, RATE CONSULTANT. INFORMATION PROVIDED TO LIGHT & POWER COMMITTEE JANUARY 9,2003 M. E. Kiburz and Associates Consulting Engineers 443 Sugarloaf Mtn Rd Boulder, Colorado 80302-9639 (303) 442-6450 Telecopy (303) 442-7472 December 22,2002 Mr. Richard Matzke Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department 170 MacGregor Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 Subject: Light and Power Department financial forecast. Purchase Order No. 010482 Dear Richard: Pursuant to our Agreement, I have prepared the attached financial forecast including the proposed 2003 and 2004 electric rate increases and summarized the analysis in this letter. The financial forecast model is developed using Microsoft Excel software and a copy is provided for use by the Light and Power Department (L&PD). The model is intended to be a tool, which will allow the L&PD to test varying cost and revenue assumptions and determine there future economic impact on operations. The attachment shows the L&PD's financial forecast for the years 2003 through 2011 assuming the proposed 2003 6.25% and 2004 6.26% electric rate increases have been implemented. Page 1 of the attachment shows that even with the proposed 2003 and 2004 rates increases the L&PD can anticipate yearly revenue deficits. The L&PD should continue to annually monitor the level ofrevehues, expenses and capital improvement expenditures to assess the need for additional future electric rate increases. The operating revenues, expenses and capital improvement budgets summarized on page 1 are developed on pages 2 through 7, which are discussed below. Page 2 shows further detail on certain revenues and expenses summarized on page 1. Page 3 shows the projection of number of bills and kWh. The method adopted for the financial model is a. projection of the number of bills based on a linear trending of 1997 - 2001 data. The projection of the number ofbill through 2011 is shown on the middle of the page. As an example the number ofresidential bills is projected to grow from 81,883 in 2002 to 96,738 in 2011. The projection of kWh sales is based on the number of bills times an average rate class use per bill. The average use per bill is set based on the average use for 1997 through 2001. The resulting kWh projection by rate class is shown on the top of the schedule. The far right hand column shows the average annual growth rate in kWh sales. As an example the residential class kWh sales are projected to grow at an annual average rate of 1.87%. The system total kWh sales are projected to grow at an average annual rate of 2.51%, excluding RMNP. The kWh sales 1 projection is an important factor in the financial forecast and is used to estimate the revenues and purchased power cost. Page 4 titled "Revenues" develops the estimated revenues by rate class. The revenues are a result of multiplying the projected kWh sales time the unit revenue for that rate class. The projected sales are from page 3 and have been previously discussed. The unit revenues ($/kWh) for 2002 are based on actual revenues and kWh sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001. The unit revenue for 2003 includes the proposed 6.25% rate increase. The unit revenues for 2004 and beyond include the proposed additional 6.26% increase in 2004. The unit revenue factor should be updated as rates are changed or as more current data becomes available. This schedule also allows for implementing future rate changes on an annual across the board basis. Miscellaneous revenues are also input on this schedule. The revenues are input to pages 1 and 2. Page 5 titled"PRPA Purchased Power Cost" projects the cost ofpurchased power. The power cost projection is based 00 page 3 kWh sales plus losses. The projected billing demands are based on factors developed from purchases in 2001. The factor allow the estimation of the billing demand from projected kWh sales plus losses. The PRPA rate is $10.64/KW and $.015/kWh and is assumed to remain at that rate in 2002 and 2003. The PRPA rate is assumed to increase by 4% in 2004. This schedule also shows the development of the purchased power rider revenues associated with the 4% PRPA rate increase. This schedule provides a basis for inputting additional future PRPA rate changes. Page 6 titled "Operating Expenses" projects the operating expenses other than purchased power. This schedule also shows historical 2000 and 2001 and budgeted amounts for 2002,2003 and 2004 expenses. The projected operating expenses use the 2004 budget expenses as the starting point. The assumed escalation rates are shown on the bottom of the page. The 6scalation rates used for a specific account are denoted in the column identified as "ER". The assumed escalation rates are 2% for all expenses except labor related, franchise fee and customer deposits. This schedule also shows the calculation ofthe Transfers out ofthe L&PD. The Transfer out are based on 9.5% ofthe revenues from sales. The assumed escalation rates are not based on an evaluation of historical trends, nor do the escalation rates reflect any detailed evaluation of future electric industry cost changes. This is an area where the analysis could be refined. Page 7 titled "Capital Improvements and Interest Income" shows the development of the capital budget, interest income and allows bond funding of capital projects. The capital budget is from data provided by the L&PD. Changes in the capital budget can easily be input in this schedule., This schedule assumes none of the capital projects are funded by customer contributions. This schedule allows for the capital projects to be funded from current revenues or bond funds. This schedule estimates interest income on L&PD Cash Available Balance at a 3% interest rate. The interest rate can be set at different levels for each ofthe years. Sincerely, Max Kiburz Attachment 0 2 k Out--91-0 C en * Do M A. M-9 0 t-91-vt- 0 en =1- 00 ChUNâ€¢- 4 1- -Mt-=t-OM O 091- 00 C 00 h w N U O t49 91- Cl r VO. Ch. 0 00% 04-Ocr) 00 10; Ch h OON=1-00 00. &.1 TV .-1 91 1 Nht-=1-Onten .0 en-=1-0~ h q * ON Ch % tiff 1 mr M O + 00 MO g 0 0 4 4 0 0 =271 - -1 el S :2 041 M Morne=On W + CON Ovt m 88*7 g NO m en Â·-1 WD. 0. 0- 9.010101~0.4.0.-toleth ~ 0 20% R 01 00 - . u 1.01 k.,1 04 Ch w 1- tr) h N 4 0 1- -1490Â»91-Â©Chhen#Ov r N 01 4 - b - r.-(M (9 00 - 002, M 00 91.- -t\- - 04 d 00Â©e cloot-en-00'Mener~ gg go Ola Noolocoothener- M 00 0110\C M 00 et- ON --1 thtl ON 2 4) en-enooWN-en- en A U W N B- q A- LO N N M en r- 1 7 9 Men -*01â€¢neÂ·10(Ch* 71 %O M U h. d a 04 4 22 SW Â©2 Â¢11 -0 = 60 6 0 - 0% E.2 TE> -2 h E- t- Me 55 45 3 % F Uu 89 M 2% $ r * iM+M ~ w in Â£@359*g& M%%4 2 Â¤2 M ( *+ 4 C ~ 1 a U U & aja m--0 000 11 >,C 0 %0 bo - b ca U N v Cl e *.0 EK #~ B IÂ£ Â£ % Ex # â‚¬ E 8 N , 8. Â·M g 3 ~0 ~1Â· -# fl Â£' CO CO CO E-1 OAZE-<O[75 CZ ZArder~*vE nths Ended 12/31 2005 2008 2009 4,377,908 4,480,041 4,582,186 M:Nt 4,786,511 4,888,692 0 1,346,012 1,384,337 1,423,771 Unrn Um= tistration 29 1,204,439 1,231.231 1,258,537 1,286.370 44 1,343,672 1,531,964 32*flf 3253 tancfx Ed= 32 302,045 300,688 297,085 298,060 29 3 298,070 000'SI I 5I9'6I LOOBE 039'9f 9Â£Z'95 884'630'I 00'I ZZE'066 IfL'8L6 8LZ'8+6 6LL'0Z6 86Â£'663 Â£ 69I'SIE 996'82Â£ LEI'OSE 9LE'Â§9Â£ (Loo'9Â») *AoidurI Iel 2 39 ({:l'::2 (71,2) 15*) (=Uy 207,000 209,070 211,16 213,27 215,40 217,559 9,210,502 9,419,188 9,627,90 9,836,66 10,045,452 10,254,276 (Cof'08Â§'I) (09L'296) (817Â£'fLE) Â£8'Cgi 6LF'Â£Â£9 ZOO'tâ‚¬0'I 750,180 771,107 792,629 814,766 nt Re~enue Funded Light And Power Department 3,765,365 4, 0 620,134 4,707,083 3,539,902 3,816 3 084,322 194,341 4,304,373 183,092 217,787 223,507 229,227 168,208 172,136 176,06 Town tes Park Financial Forecast *S@suadxo uog V ~Inulpe pue Slunoooe lotuolsno ounq!Â·46!p Jo luotudopAOP JOJ I PS Â· fOOZ/8/I 36 7,678,538 (68Â£ Asuodxo i@mo poseqoindjo juouudoloA@p JOJ 7q0p IUI@l SUOI UO 16O191u! put? Ied!0uudio uo!10 o foi 101 L Jo L 'S@nUOA@ 1 Suquigdo-UONJO luotudopA@ .IOJ L Jo E 'SOIES UIO# SOnUOAO.I JO %9'6 19 pole[UNS@ 019 1no SonUOA@1 jO luQUIdOI@A@p JOJ venue: (1) Suloueud lS do uInSSIX.ZOAOI}suooioJ & g 61 -5.-9 .MA E- 00 . 00 G 00 c< 1ve Months Ended 12/31 2002 2003 2004 2005 2009 tal Projects Town of Estes Park nt Revenue Funded Light And Power Department Financial Forecast I los Â£00Z/8/I age 7 of 7 for forecast of c tal budget. .ssurnes Capital Projects are fu d with current revenues. 2003 and 2004 expenses and non rate revenues are per the Town's budget. 2003 and 2004 sales revenue and purchased power are forecast using the method decribed in this document. lS do umssIX.ZOAORSEOGIOJ rl MON C\O g 00 1 e 000".)5.-1 0 ht\ONÂ»\000 hee-la.M (9 0 r.2 41 00 0\ 6 0 % 91- 04 1 - 4- 00 h 00 00. Vi rn q N A 8 - 00 - - â‚¬2 %6 U fi =60 0 88 -04 3 U 24 M Â·Â· F,&5/1439 as E IL % 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 4-, 4.-4 44 2 1 2 8,2'C mB â‚¬ S u W d u 000 Ad a 0 2 Â·F k - Et-VlÂ« 0 (2Â© 4 .-1 S a 1 1-5[2{ Z .Z -2 -M .R. 9 ..M 2 3, ce QUU U 2 . 2 - F 7 21 ~8 *- li * mp p /O 3 f. %@i~ i MA kgoot A KÂ·% g MT 5 8 9% #call EA 8% 00 0 0 00*ZA<065 07 0 4 Di ff; 4 vi vi @0 rojects Town tes Park nt Revenue Funded Light And Power Department Financial Forecast Set 1 4,990,886 5,093,091 1,593,274 1,638,766 885,035 909,809 s ation & General (3) ,373,171 1.403.253 366 9,044,919 1,627,112 300,455 000'9I 65L'890'I ino slo 868'ZLZ 617Â£'5I0'I (I yf'ZW,) 5,054,878 5,141,827 arge & RMNP 4,744,631 4,854,729 ~''~ 257,828 195,71 219,735 221,93 10,463,135 10,672,031 ( Ef'Â£00'0 (886'092'Z) Months Ended 12/31 1UOUIdopA@p IOJ L luetudoI@Aep IOJ L luou[dopAOP 101 L Jo uo!100 fold IOJ L Jo L @Sed oos JUOUIdopA@p 101 L JO Z Revenue: (1) (8) BUIOUBIHE[ puog '6 w pole[Unse O.re 111~ SIOJSUE.I E do mnssIX.ZOAWJ --1 . R 0 % O LE 4 0 44 NPM 8 a. 0 M 58:0 E-ca<29 . 00 G 06 04 apital Projects Town of Estes Park rrent Revenue Funded Light And Power Department Financial Forecast I PS EOOZ/8/I nths Ended 12/31 of 7 for forecast of ci apital Projects are ful and 2004 expenses and n i using the method decribed in t lS dO wnssIX.Z~AO~BooloJ 0 O 1-1 =r e b MI M C edi t- 1 0 MI M 0. 011 M -1â‚¬910 N col en U M 001 41 R -1 ON U - Chi 00 M 00 0 O -1 M h -10 O â€¢Al w .00 CÂ·41 M N 91 9 00 h' 0 N ell M N v,1 d U M El- 00 -1 1 en Chi U Cl /EN - M M 00 - M h 91- 0 M N - h E- en 00 81 - 0 M [ M u ON . . Al *1 cn 00 h Q N 0 M - w N 1 * O 01 0 001 C u t-OÂ»CNI Cl tE CA. * 1- M ~ r-- -- e. n *. 01 n] -1 n n En 4,- ool 2%92 EW h DO - 1 7 -1 0 -Clow-04 0 00 e M h el 04 011 w h 0% Ch m N =I-1 (9 00-M-01- N C. t.1 0- -- LA M + 0 - - Nt\Â»91-Â©Men h M 0% 0 -1 0% t- u .r) h MI M-=1-Ch Â»U b O 0 04~ 4- O% 04 el M W 010\) NU .... . n 91- cl n m. Cl. 11 - C.1 el 011 M \0 \O -4 N MI =r MOO Cd N eli Ch-ent- -rn 4-=1- -1 vo O en - O,1 h ./.(9 - 01 00 -1 ~n 91-91- ON - Ment\.,50-00 DO h 04 Q ~00 a Annic- -0% 0 r-4-0%10 46 1 N 0 0 0 Nt- -M 04 h en N - N Q 1 I . 12 C~ - 04 3 2 xi--hucooo 5 A & 1 enteen h 00 g #/ AR VA Mil 22 Wet %3. 2 (7. 0 0 M en MI E Â·-1 01 - Cl 1 ~4 0 0 0 4 0 on M el co a ---- 0.3Â§11% 5- 2- . - .1 - t~ M 9 4 crlo~NO]%O Chlrl 00 -4 t-1 0 -r MM 4-1 - 001 M 04 n =r Cl 000 C 0 4 - 0 W O =fl e 8 01 04. 0. 91 01 N - eli W 0 M - 001 0 04 5 00 - O 0 04 b ht\ ... 0 - Â¢1 0 0 01 U 2 - 9. 410. N.1 9 0 R - %0 + -1 M r- M - 001 N n W b u t 50 22 5 0 0 2 a '42 0- E ~ 23 8 FE_E628 .M 8 8 2 O *11-R A -E -2 .= 2 M at E 3 = 4 ..m 3 4 e (4 xr g 0 >4 CS 0 2 CS 0 8 .5 m g H _ 4 Â· O 4 r @ d Â·M E :3 g .a i & 8 2 ..4 S 5 R. 04 Â£ = 15 -3 .=1 2 k 64 . 21 5 & 4 5 R 3 40* 4 8: PE H (5 2 /5 00 04 M co A W A U 4 00 A 3,765,365 4,130,302 4,533,186 4 1= =n= 183,092 199,663 217,787 6,387 252,108 168,208 7,854 191,784 251,500 202.00 207,000 217,559 219,735 7,739,859 8,348,095 9,210,502 9,41 10,254,276 10,463,135 chased Power 4,013,323 4,111,506 4,377,908 4,480,041 4,582,186 4,684 343 4,888,692 4,990,886 a nes 785,639 746,954 906 8 934,054 962,076 990 938 1,051,287 1,082,825 enefits 141,289 148,878 168 051 178,285 183,634 194,817 200,662 Maintenance 266,450 101,200 103 70 0 105,774 107,889 11004 114,493 116,783 083'g, 178L'0* #86'6Â£ 660'0# 6I*Z gouvinkul 2007 2009 10 tls'8*Â§ L99'L8* Â£9*'Â£LP 290'Â£Â£4 9Â£L'ELE 686'It 99L'0* LOE'LE 022'9Â£ 6ZI'Â£Â£ I60'6Z ILÂ£'9II Z86'ZII 96f 90 I *6Â£'EOI Â£8Â£'00I 69*'L6 80+'68 906'9ZE 98Â£'LIE Ill'80Â£ 99I'66Z 25#'06Z Z66'ISZ 6LL'ELZ 028'993 908'89Z 9Â£2'52 IOS'*Z 88L'EE 560'E Ezt'ZE 69L'IZ SEI'IE LEg'02 I 84'6 I 59,627 57,715 69 9 46 74,208 76,434 81,089 8, 2 * 8/Z'St g9t'gf fLS'ff 0 L f 098'It, 003'Of Â£*8'*9 9 EOI'I9 906'65 00*'99 ESL'ZI LIO'ZI I SL'I I looV @Iqu100!Iooufl Â£5'LES 99L'*I8 LOI'ILL ED'I I6 grra Light and Power 002'Z TTWZI wrri- wrgr LEE'178Â£'I Elos EOOZ/8/I Town 3,539,902 3,816,130 4,084,322 Budget Operating Revenues: erating Expenses: @UIO}Snj 'S do.13GsIX.ZOADIJSBooloj 01 V.11 - U O C O col ht\40Â»h 0 91 -1 n h 0- 0 em Net- M N A h * 04 0 n 30,>O.04 e el h t--1 N O %O 0 0 01 u 01 0 00 Chi t- 00 0 h --99.9 0Â°19.no<-0 - h N 00 001 en M - 00 01 enl =t =r - A M M g b n. <r' Vi- rn O. Ne ...1 00 --1 U e O 0, -1 0 N b - N M *I * O N O 0 0 CIO 00 0 14941 'r) 00 0 M AW 00ko N 91-Chu= 0 0.91 M oa ri n 92 -1 0, co 00 0,0003~ et 0% n n q en h 00 h M en Â« 04 6 00 d N 1 91- O 00 M 0~ n 00 mr Q 00 0% b N M 04 M - 1 0 - 1 + - C C DO 71 M-1-0.N r--1 CO,-1 Cl Q 00 01 00 01 0 V~ 0 \0 0 01 QI O h W O 0 M 01 10 Cl 04 01 u M o V-) Er O en en r. 001 t- 01 en w O -i~ â€ž 41 n rt:, n n, n n h th. E th. 91 n Â°o. 0% q CL 9. ele- E Q 1 - O t- 00 Q - t'* bl Q O Q 00 .A=r 01 10 91Â· %O 00 01 eli DO .1 DO Ch -4 .-4 00 --1 O 00 DO N v - Cll h er) M M 01 M H M BON MI M N 00 00 n 00 40 n 01 E QI nnt-- o 0\ 4' t<' ~0 - r. ~6100 h O h r-(9â€¢-A' N M M n $ e 0. e1 Cl 01 O. nol -1 00--1 N '61 -4 M en 010 & 1 t- 001 en - h 4 - rt. 91 rl h ./. 1 2 eli en U M O 2A 1- 09.nen --It- r. t= 0 0 .-11,900 0 N N M 01 0 00 1 M O U el 4-entr,In O 0 00 N col en m W * o en 1 9.10 29 41 n n m 91 rt n e. q O. N. ArnÂ© M %0 0 b wl * 00 + 04 In - e M 00 4- M 04 col C t- Cl C -1 9 0. VE n M -t-- 0 0 01 00 in (91 0 \0 0\ 0 c ,- O 00 04 091 04 cl M 0 8 018 h vil -4 4,0 M M 41, I d O M 0 E h 41 N. 11 Ch. E .r. 0 â‚¬ n -1 A tn * M 00 h 1 1 M M 04 0 - U r .-It- + col 5 1 0 G u r- -1 101(9 -t-- M O 0 '.0 00,000Â©ler)-00 M CIM OM~en- 00 0 0 0 0 0, 01 0 00 h m ti= 7 1-1.Vel-9.tlerâ‚¬Â·rittel'nooottl SE.0-ma ~ ~| 1- en h %0Â·h N b (9 00 cnI' M M C o .) 1 1 M 52) e h DO h M 00 00 0 04 U h h N 1 00 U 01 - CIA - P. e. M- M m t-1-3 r% 44 2 60 0 0 tz 0 11 9 S 0 k. . 0. 4 0.9 - 2 0%44 : AN- 2 ~ 2 6 22 12 Â§@Nte"3 -7511 ftÂ¢=0 c:OE q 840 O -0.. ;3 CÂ·4 0.- O 4â€¢ ~ EA g U g. 2 4 8â‚¬23 E Â·8' 9 1 2 Â© 2 44 1 ~ 66 O 4 M 0 2 04 2 ul E Ell 2 0 09=C M- 2 -2 *9 41 M. 1 06 --0 2 -M 12 -* 41 â‚¬ 2Â· 93. A . re .t: - 9 - .24 2 8 rÂ° b Z M .El '3 A Â·e tg 44 Â·g . '0 -- 4~%~~-% R .2 O k Z - 8-4 < U CO Z--ini Employee Benefits 72 49,502 4,220 55,847 2 9,248 61,025 , 6 84,180 83,166 84,829 90,021 75,720 76,854 78,391 84,853 86,250 ,350 79,350 79,350 79,350 79,350 hicle M 120,000 122,400 1 1 132,490 135,139 13 6 62,389 7,170 20,~90 2,953 8,249 2003 200 2006 2009 2010 000'5I 000'9I LOO'17Â£ Z ' 9Â£2'9 â‚¬ZC~'I ~~6 I *98' Â§ 1, I 2~~1Â§~N TU2~NI1 ICE'511 LO IquI BA CZ~~ 167 ' 29) (2097 33) {32) 227 Ff~ 2Â£2~ { rofessi 43,250 44,625 45,518 48,304 57,750 6 61,863 63,100 66,963 6 244,383 270,105 276,304 282,502 288,7 301,102 307,302 I 000'M 00 YI 000'fI 00 FI 000'FI wn of Estes Park Power Dep rtment 889'0 LO~'6I 039'IE EZ6'8L ~i~3 6Lf'0~6 9EE'#Â£8 Z los Â£00Z/8/I ,sesugdx@ 101 soW uoqUIEOS@ po[UnSSE IO~ L~0 9 08ed oos lS do .WCISIX.ZOAgijsuooloj I o u uo solou 906 5 ~ ES * RE MON- g 8 u 1 60 E = B C 8 0 O.4-1 0 K <2 A-IC ce..9 O 6-1 5 g M al) an'~ 4 93 - >â€¢ * Â·ove~=_.gm-s-0.2 4*"Loiumag 1 81â‚¬ 2.Â§2 2-2/4 %Â·0'.8 83 gaa Â·EÂ·i 5% - 0,28*2251,#cEMGOA,Wmul'EÂ©40 . 0 0 m. w Mi 03&,Vul b E .9 0 Light nd Power partment nancial Forecast Detailed Z los EOOUSI 5,141,827 erc a 4,854,729 257,828 5,093,091 1,115,310 86,027 195,71 221.93 119,119 86I'05 8Zo'ff ooz'Z zor-#r 99L'8Â£9'I 0*Â£'595 6*Z'Ef 298'6II Slgaugg Z9*'L9 JOUWU@JUTE , L9Z'EI 1009 *IquloOHoou fIL'9Â£Â£ SOLIBIE Â£66'53 sexel IIOIXEd 10,672,03 8Z9'00I 608'606 Benefits 206,682 Slunooov perating Revenues: Expenses: .UOD lS do 'lOGBIX Z0A91}SE09103 N 00 1.0 00 - co 0 01 h M en 1 001 M 0, 01 M e C el o M *1 gr M M \0 00 0 M gren--- %01 M -- M o 91- 7 ..1 t.-1 EN E zinn. 00 i n .*. rt 't] 01 Ch .1 ri O. 8 -1 1- M o ON 00 en e r- en r- en 00 el rn 4 5 0 M 9, 9 01 v ON in W 00 -brnv N 4-1 04Â·(90 -4 - 5 Of 011 00 =t <R E en 0. g â€ž- 0, + -V 0.80 g E 3 2 . R J e Ke ./. W 8 4 2 .24 AM" 291 ige 8 .9 Â£ 25 8 *i .a B ~Â· 8 m '41.9 :2Â· *3 11 0 ce .E 2 2 N F & g t S N E-, fÂ·i .S 03 2 1 -3 4 4 1- 5. t~9 -h Â£ A a-- 33-#a 4.2 ~Â·-Â·uÂ·- +4Â·-Â·- E ~w .8 & 8,Â·c; * c.- 8 2 2 s - St RiE' 0,0 2. , % 9 2 "3 1 .54 0 3 2 0 2.U'Â¤ -- co ul O Â£ 01 0 2 04 > di S AÂ© C L,2 - 64 Q 1, ce O U â€¢Â¤ ~M .2 0 -2 :2 # Â·- U 0 1 d Oum E. 94.C 33:9381 # IN .54 0. 3 u A Z. 6-4 < O 41 Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department Financial Forecast Detailed Z los FOOZ/8/I 69L'890'I 868'ZLZ POU~~.I~UBSC5 "~ 'E @nU@A@li Other lS do *PCISIXÂ·ZOAanSBOOIOJ t n A e h 0 en DO N N M N M 1 - O h DO 000 g U. enÂ·61 r-. 0 00 1- Cle 00 -1 0 -- Cl 10 0 -1 00 - M b 01 e 00 M _1 t- 46 rn h el 0% Ch h In e U t- 00 ed =r * 7 9- 1 Q tr) 04 00 Qi - n--no.Mne nx:la N N 10 0 b M M -1 M U N el cv -O- V.1 04 'ht-1- RR@ RE & R O =red=ro 00 - O 1-1 Q R 1 -1 0. Ch. N -- /:A ni N.N. 0. r- N â€¢,1 0 M -1 %0014-Oh- 1/1 CN Cl 1- O In %01 - M MI N C=)11 N =f MI r-- O =f el n -2 1 A N 01 1141 N -1 0 At u -1 * IF A =re en *1 xr u h \O 001 0, Wheell Vi 01 -1 N 01 04 01 0 20 2 - h Chi O g N - 01 \0 -1 N 2 0 1- 0 0 0% 091-00Â©h 0% .* 0% Cl Ve n - g 0\ 5 10 er) en cr) 00 mi- Ch 00 45 0%00%0NO 04 1 ./ Ch- 0- WD .t- 40. 01 Sdi t.1 - E t t .-4 g 8 3 E am 1 Â£& -' @83:% Man"R =i EME 0, \0 Ch St ~Â£&329*1 144,88403 818,2 6. g G * 06 + 0 . p E - B *0 8 8 .2 0 Z C 3 4 1 3 . 60 0 ci 85&&&.Beele# ide<-eeope# %&&64 i 8 R De~nd 35852 37724 38365 40,409 40,123 40,931 41,7 0 43,358 44,166 2703 3076 3421 3,693 4,326 4,733 '954 16,}61 50803. 50653 52808 52922 54846 56,513 57,757 61,489 62,733 20480 21147 22157 22870 23,067 24,754 25,689 6,62 28,496 29,431 n ial 73,570 75,333 77,009 78,513 80,820 81,883 83,534 85,184 86,835 88,485 90,136 6 8II '96 Â£92'26 98â‚¬06 869'88 Â£94'98 ZEI'58 yZE'Â£8 I *8'08 LEE'IZ 64902 IL6'6I 9I9'8I LÂ£6'L I 608'9 I 929'9 I 858'gI 481'91 I69'1,I 6,081 6,480 6,511 6,120 5,876 6,350 6,365 6,394 9 6,424 fOZ'EZI L09'OZI OIO'8II EI17'5II 9I8'ZII 6IZ'OII 9*Â§'LOI EII'fOI 9Â£6'ZOI +ZE'OOI 86Z'L6 08Â£'I 08Â£'I 08E'I 08Â£'I 08Â£'I 08Â£'I ELE'I 9LE'I Â£6Â£'I IIBIUS SD 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 12061 12098 12008 11136 10,744 12,065 12,093 1 12,177 I ~50' I CEO'I L66 6L6 996 Â£*6 Â·906 688 8IS L6L 9Â§L 9Â£L t,L9 OOL t799 I99 Â£Â£9 0617 0617 06+' 06# 06f 009 68* 9Lt 006'I 006'I 006'I 006'I 006'I 8ZS'I 0Z8'I L98'I 0Z6'I 0Z6'I 026' I 0Z6'I 0Z6'I 5/8'I 698'I fI6'I 688'Z 59t''Z EgE'Z ZOO'Z 0Â£8'I ZI9'I ZI t' I 06I'I I6 48 SOI EL Power Department 103 ~ 104354 10'GE 110, 1 119,309 122,1 Sales Projection (Z) @sn Set 3 IEÂ£ 60Â£ f8Z 9LE Â£8E 8I9 ZI9 609 2611 2665 2649 1167 Historical Data ZL JOI OIESSIX.ZOAN 19200IOJ N 0.4 0 el 0 OM Cl 000 000 n n q "-1 01 XI . 000 000 n n O. Cl col 000 010 0 0 el M M O 011 = N. 4 Cl Wooo 0000 OMMO 0 rv=Off . 1 0.6 - â‚¬n . 0 0 -ec C 091-0 0 4- In a A.1 5 01 of or Crt 01 DO 0 0 U (21 1,9 2 01 - Â¢91 r.4 en 04 5 0 0 04 e 01 0 0 0 WN O 0 0 00 Chi h , 2 1 4 Chi 00 mr Â¥-11 = .. t M) a ~4 .389=- 13 O 9 8 0 04 I i.k * 1 4 Â« 2 & 2 2 :0 M ~ co 99 2 1 8 4 R Q 4% 3 :m:*22&488&2/ NeÂ·n""14 2 500 2,500 4,125 4,032 3,989 3,817 4,099 4 000 4,000 1998 2004 2005 2006 31,705 31, 31 500 artment of Estes Park al Data Pmected E los EOOZ/8/ I 1. Number bills forecast based on a linear trend fit of 1997 - 2001 data. e kWh/bill is based on average ofrate class used for 1997-2001. rojection based on number of bills projection time kWh/bill. ::32X 88Â£'I 558'IE EIO't' '9881@AB leO 10:I GIESSIX.ZOADI}SEODIOj 2 5 9 09 4 PEN - 40* 000 0 % CheN 00 n -- O M DCD %0 cgi U ON 001 N M.MA N. M m -1 0 Cr~ 0 .0 041 e 000 U - tal 04 CheN M 4,. v,4 1. r M.) M -11 40 -- M MOO u h N en \01 M Crtur-W M en en I t- rv. r.'. n N 911 41 n Clucle M -1 M Q en en U REM 1 . t Et 0 ~ 1 0 8 1 E & a 1 4 Ma pa :9 & a 'R C.gn,~ 2 520*64 . g rn a H Â·a g .g 1 1 * 6 M & j 2, * . d 1 8 1 ~~*~1~~r,CRCOU(41155 ra =gu~Ulp6* EÂ»21'0414--CDOUNIALE- Â£@@gicaÂ©[De~NET ~Â£624- Town es Park Light and Power Department Sales Projection 7,175 7,582 7.0~% 65,220 66,464 67,708 2.03% 31,302 32,238 33,173 3.31% 34,263 34,833 35,403 35,973 1.72% 3, 78 2.51% 1,606 1.50% EPS . 12,261 12,290 :3 276 3.54% 84 142,139 2.24% 95,087 966~4883 Z8Â£'LOI *09'90I LE9'Â£0I OSCIOI 690'fZ I9Â£'Â£Z Â£89'ZE 500'ZZ Z69'Â£EI Â§66'0Â£I 86Â£'8ZI IOSTZI 6,439 6,453 6,468 I9T'17 61,6'Â£ LEL'Â£ 539'Â£ I fEI'I 90I'I 880'I LOI t,0 I IOI 668 6L8 858 06f 06t 006'I '006'I 0Z6'I 0Z6' I I 08Â£'I 08Â£'I 08Â£'I IIBUIS SD 2008 2009 ' 1 44,975 45,784 46 59 91,786 93,437 storical Data IOA @IESSIX ZOA@11SHOPIOJ , 1 6 ..40 2, U O 4G -10 0 0 01 n n O. -10 0 0 011 - N 9 C--1 010 0 0 -10 0 0 01 n n O ~~1 4 of Â« M NO 0 010 0 01 M M 041 4 Or M 001 000 010 0 0 91 n n 0. 01 C 0 â‚¬ U t /5, C m. _ + gn - - U M O.6 Aâ€¢ M ... - O 3 9 po 0 01 6. 4 <4.2 5 66 5 9 26 4K a Fâ€¢ 3 E M 0-0 EM c,6 â‚¬~A$4.E~ 885/* 2 . -PHM=M~COm)2332= . m >4 1 â€ž-4 N er) f 4 of Estes Park r Department s P ojection Â£ los EOOZ/8/I 4,000 istorical Data Number bills foi . Average kWIÂ©j year averag Ual 10:I 0IESSIX.ZOAO.IJSEONOJ Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department Revenues 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 MWh (1) Residential Â·40,123 40,931 41,740 42,549 43,358 44,166 44,975 45,784 46,593 Res. Demand 12,065 12,093 12,121 12,149 12,177 12,205 12,233 12,261 12,290 Res. TOD 4,326 4,733 5,140 5,547 5,954 6,361 6,768 7,175 7,582 Subtotal 56,513 57,757 59,001 60,245 61,489 62,733 63,976 65,220 66,464 GS Small 24,754 25,689 26,625 27,560 28,496 29,431 30,367 31,302 32,238 GS Large 30,842 31,412 31,982 32,552 33,122 33,692 34,263 34,833 35,403 GS TOD 202 210 219 227 235 243 252 260 268 Municipal 2,944 3,025 3,107 3,188 3,270 3,352 3,433 3,515 3,596 RMNP 1.405 1.426 1.447 1.469 1.491 1.513 1.536 1.559 1.582 Total 116,659 119,519 122,380 125,241 128,103 130,964 133,826 136,689 139,552 Unit Revenue $/kWh (2) Residential 0.0696 0.0746 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Res. Demand 0.0645 0.0712 0.0776 0.0776 0.0776 0.0776 0.0776 0.0776 0.0776 Res. TOD 0.045 0.0456 0.0493 0.0493 0.0493 0.0493 0.0493 0.0493 0.0493 Subtotal GS Small 0.0742 0.0773 0.0805 0.0805 0.0805 0.0805 0.0805 0.0805 0.0805 GS Large 0.0534 0.0562 0.0585 0.0585 0.0585 0.0585 0.0585 0.0585 0.0585 GS TOD 0.0524 0.059 0.0615 0.0615 0.0615 0.0615 0.0615 0.0615 0.0615 Municipal 0.0622 0.066 0.0701 0.0701 0.0701 0.0701 0.0701 0.0701 0.0701 RMNP 0.0325 0.0369 0.03915 0.03915 0.03915 0.03915 0.03915 0.03915 0.03915 Revenue: ($) (3) Residential 2,792,538 3,053,484 3,339,213 3,403,912 3,468,612 3,533,312 3,598,011 3,662,711 3,727,410 Res. Demand 778,168 861,003 940,579 942,761 944,943 947,125 949,307 951,489 953,671 Res. TOD 194.659 215,816 253,394 273.461 293.528 313.595 333.662 353,729 373.797 Subtotal 3,765,365 4,130,302 4,533,186 4,620,134 4,707,083 4,794,032 4,880,981 4,967,930 5,054,878 GS Small 1,836,718 1,985,769 2,143,282 2,218,589 2,293,897 2,369,205 2,444,513 2,519,821 2,595,129 GS Large 1,646,944 1,765,343 1,870,944 1,904,298 1,937,652 1,971,005 2,004,359 2,037,713 2,071,067 GS TOD 10,585 12,405 13,438 13,945 14,453 14,960 15,467 15,975 16,482 Municipal 183,092 199,663 217,787 223,507 229,227 234,947 240,667 246,387 252,108 BMNP 45,655 52.613 56.659 57.508 58,371 59.247 60.135 61.037 61,953 Total 7,488,359 8,146,095 8,835,294 9,037,982 9,240,683 9,443,396 9,646,123 9,848,863 10,051,617 Miscell. Revenue 251,500 202,000 207,000 209,070 211,161 213,272 215,405 217,559 219,735 Escalation 1.01 Proposed Rate Changes: (Across the Board) Annual Change % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Accum Change % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes: 1. Sales projection frompage 3 of7. 2. Unit revenue based on data for twelve months ended 12/31/2001 for 2002. 2003 includes a rate increase of 6.25%. 2004 and beyond includes an additional rate increase of 6.26%. 3. Revenue equals MWh sales times unit revenues. forecastrev02.xlsRevenue 1/8/2003 Set 4 1 Town of Estes Park Light and Power Department Revenues 2011 MWh (1) Residential 47,401 Res. Demand 12,318 Res. TOD 7,989 Subtotal 67,708 GS Small 33,173 GS Large 35,973 GS TOD 276 Municipal 3,678 RMNP 01.606 Total 142,415 Unit Revenue $/kWh (2) Residential 0.08 Res. Demand 0.0776 Res. TOD 0.0493 Subtotal GS Small 0.0805 GS Large 0.0585 GS TOD 0.0615 Municipal 0.0701 BMNP 0.03915 Revenue: ($) (3) Residential 3,792,110 Res. Demand 955,854 Res. TOD 393,864 Subtotal 5,141,827 GS Small 2,670,437 GS Large 2,104,421 GS TOD 16,989 Municipal 257,828 BMNP .62.882 Total 10,254,384' Miscell. Revenue 221,932 Escalation Proposed Rate Changes: (. Annual Change % 0.00% Accum Change % ' 0.00% Revenue o Notes: 1. Sales projection from E 2. Unit revenue based on 2004 and beyond inclu 3. Revenue equals MWh forecastrevO2.xlsRevenue Â· 1/8/2003 Set 4 2 -10, Vl ro - 0 01 -4 31 5 2 0 01 G 0 6 0919 CNI Cf 2 N g M 0 * M 5 - ' %32 3 2 gl m 41 oo or) N ~ A All-ht\ - 01 04 Oclo 9 0 4 1 9 1 d 0*-) r--1 0 el %0 00 cK 09 Â»1 01 M U 00 01./ %4M gl22 6.04 11 n (Ch r-1 g %0 %01 00 01 *0 El 4% 0 el 00 eli 02 91 -1 4 h' g Cr, 90 V) BEB W 0 el - 0 g Ng M ~ N 031 6 Ir V' 0100 01 0 t-1 h r- 4 1% 94- i & In Ems<E 0 4 O 91 M ; O 01 U N O O el O 00 N t--4 U M 0 6 O 01 M 04 0 194* X 2 t.-1 0 00 ..f 2 M oct Cl E 0 9 a 3 4 .E= 6. 0 '8 2 tee 00 M 5 - CO O 0 04, 1.1 0~ ~ 1205â€¢9 1 Â§* Â° 3509 s 0 RIA M 2 '2~ 39% &8% - 00 0 00 M \0 g /5 fEd -4 %3%'2Â£%Ed&~dawa~42 :4Â»OUZ-14<Ma Z 0 Â§02*ggm#% 4 Purchases 122,280 12 128,270 131,265 134,261 137,257 140,254 143,25 146,248 149,245 k Coin Demand KW 20,834 21 21,855 22,365 22,875 23,386 23,897 24 24,918 25,429 204,383 209,388 214,394 219,401 224,409 229,417 234,425 239,434 244,444 249,454 10.64 10.64 10.64 11.0656 11.0656 11.0656 11.0656 11.0656 11.0656 11.0656 11.0656 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 2,174,630 2,227,891 2,372,403 2,427,807 2, 83,216 2,538,632 2,594,055 2,649,484 2,704,920 2,760,363 3 1,879,115 2,001,004 2,047,734 2, 94,470 2,141,210 2,187,957 2,234,708 2,281,466 2,328,229 (Purchases) 32.8 34.13 34.13 34.13 4,78911 4,8885~3 4 34.13 34.13 gil'56I *8L'I 6I *98'LBI +26'Â£8 I *66'6LI 990'9LI 9Â£I'ELI 80Z'89 I *9'OI 12,000 12,000 12,000 1 12,000 12,000 2002 2003 2004 2008 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 wn of Â£,stes Park @Rfl IOOZ 0081@Av 866 I L66I 566I 966I 0.67 0.67 0.67 0. 7 .6 9.81 9.81 9.81 1 6I8'6I EIS'ZE OSI'*I I9L'IE 9Z5'LI 9If*6I 9Â§Z'8LI IgI'9LI LL6'fLI I08'89I fLS'29*'9I I 5Â£0'L9I'60I 885'06I'LOI 902'9Â£8'Â£OI 9Z6'95Â£'00I IL9*0 L09'0 *59'0 fL90 945.0 17Â§90 0I86 598.8 8 I6L 50L'6 L80'8 I 6 *d 01 qi partment wer Cost Sales (1) 116,457 119 09 122,161 125 1 21 133,575 136 t,L8'ZOE SL8'Â£0Z 086'I8I *6*'8LI (uow-AAN) 63.5 9/* ./ f.9 Vad 941 01 Slu@UI:Sn[pe KUÂ¥ toot U! %* 24 06ue[Ou! 01 poulnsse 018 Sow gps E00U8/I fIO'O Sjlpl OLI109[0 5,[[MolÂ· 941 U! PWOOIJol 19*Ods'X.ZOAORSEOgIOJ =1-*r-MONO 00 01 00 t-Che NNUM m M (9 - A - . U-eN 91-â€ž 00 1 #O 4 U - 0 W ./. rn â‚¬-L 1 MON I 04 R 1 0 -1 h 00 0 -1 M 24412 . -1 00 pt pl n r- -,1' 0 0 0 4-1 01 col O 0 0 0 1- 01 00 Â»0404 JO- 91 - r# 6 ef -1 W r-1 C 91- en 1 1 001 M Cf'; r- 00\O O 041 - M 0 2 411 Cl 0. N. (.4 01 ON o N 1- MI 40 =t- 1 V) 001 0 t-- M ==ammarnal 444<.#KI -1 4400000.- m 1 5 0, 0 C G C *1 00 U --00 01 5 M -04 V, COO\OM 09 N 00 â€¢0 0 - 0 ul 00 M ON Cl 0 0 01 Q 0 00 h 0 VÂ·) 0 cl -~ 00 t~ te 9% E rl 911 rl 01 M. re)1 9% h 02 E 41 0 oil 02 0041"191.:M N-0-5. 4-1 ON - Â£0 0 h â‚¬9 04 -4 . en ON - u - -1 M 20% O, b 00 r-A 4, 00 DO 00,091-U*W P-/1 =f h N h M -1 001 N M-grent-Qt-ent- Â¤ 31 200 b + M n m U N (9 1 0 A g - 50 0 \0 0 2 M . \0 00 1 0 0 041 'n 00 00 0, 00 001 h MOO 0 001 1 M 00 N * =fl =r m f. M VT U M no.mic- M Q M 041 0 N M * 2 =r *1 g 00 Cl - N 8 U 0 8 :% di E >4 - 0 M P % U % 04 1 1 3 34 Ah ul 32 8 N E..54 7 Â·& a .2 2 9 5 -% R %.9 % ~ .5 -g o .- - .2.9 4. U B.' g Ce 8 = * 5 & g, L 2 8 .33 - *' 31 . 0 = .3.2 a 1 5 2 8 9 1= 0 9 1 4/emes@Owd#Â£81 - 00 A W O Â£ 5 5 E Ad> 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 551,550 728,897 746,954 906,849 934,054 962,076 990,938 41,783 54,566 57,715 69,948 72,046 74,208 76,43 97,130 133,616 148,878 168,051 73 ,093 178,285 183,63 51,466 196,190 101,200 103,700 05,774 107,889 110 04 8.341 12364 12 36 12 864 13 121 253,106 294,944 433,062 459,673 473 463 487,667 502,297 24,061 33,129. 35,165 36,220 37,307 38,426 Benefits 64,954 89,408 97,459 100,383 103,394 106,496 52Â£'39 EOI'I9 506'69 OEL'85 00Â¢99 692'98 LE'ZI LIO'ZI I 8L' I I 095'I I 00' I I LIZ'Â§ 1007 OIquloonooufl 99626 EfI I6 55Â£ 68 TEUTT 99L'*I8 99I'66Z 25*'061 Z66' I 8Z 6LL'Â£LZ 0Z8'993 8*0'IkE 5Â£8'Â£6I ZOL'8*Z ZOS'ZBZ VOE'9LE SOI'OLE Â£80#tz 98026I StÂ£'fBI OSFIfouu-tI Jo nof'-1 09Â£'6L 05Â£'6L 0Â§Â£'6L 09Â£'6L 05Â£'6L OSE'LL 05E'LL f21762I ILO'17I StÂ£'LEI 8*8'17ZI 00*'EZI 000'OZI 000'FI I 000'0 I 000'LS 986'L6 I6L'85 8Â£9'Ld 809'99 00Â¢59 0I9't'L ~ 69#28I OSI'OZ IZE'EI 'luju 1,180,709 1,423,771 1,464,349 Â£'17 OOI'Â£9 Â£98'I9 059'09 OSL'Ly ESI'Eg XvId 5 IS 656'6L I6E'8L *58'9L OZL'FL 0I6'It, 098'L[ SON 29,909 41,85 44,574 9 2 ZES 99I'Â£8 56'IS OSI'*8 5Z9't+ 05L'Ef 053'Et LdE'ZE 86 I '0+ Power Department Town of .stes Park ng Expenses 9 39's EOOE/8/r Actual 26,990 ooz'Z IZ8'17Â£ -91!JouoÂ£[ DOXOId 6E656Z 852'92 er Accounts Distributio dxa do Â·PCISIxÂ·ZOAORSEOOioj U C en ~010 M er) h 001 h 2 4 h e-1 04 (191 N V-1 - eli h el-jNNNO e O N MI 00009 U 94.991 00000 g \0 - b \01 M W CO NNNC 099 0 0 00000 Â£4 041 0 (91 04 11 Ch "l M =r red r- M "-1 9 0 0 0 0 <Mil 00 Och '- n. 5- - uhh 1 1 k == 0 + , 20 0 m . :3 O M ela 0 - 001 00 O.M.N.IN O b er,1 le f..11 - - M col U - 01 %01 N 13 0 - 41 00- 911 h . O B crl W 0 W --4 -1 pX 00 2 2//1 9 .41 C r. P g <' -7 1 15 d 3 0* 840 .M .C 5 8. r.41% 6/ V : B /9 ead 90 ..91-3 13 4 a 3 1 5 1 f 1 2 7 8 E 32 -M 8 i -~ <* --* Emd ~E 3 -2 8 43 2 â€¢ 3 6 5 8 ~M 'g E W .'% u E 8 8 1 8 ammovi~i ~;32481125A34 ~LÂ£@ES 2001 2002 ER 2003 2005 2007 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 06Â£'Â£29'6 8*L'9It,'6 8I I'0IZ'6 ZOS'Â£00'6 560'9*I'8 L9Z'Â§0Â£'L I9ZÂ£LI9 EO' Â£0 Â£00 Â£0*0 Â£0'0 Â£0'0 6I986Z0'0 (I)% 004 OSI 2,018,218 2,783,625 3,223,558 130 2204:NY 1,'32~~~244 1:<3*337 1:CZE~84 LO~.0 LO:00-0 g:00-0 L000.0 L000'0 I 300.0 IZOO'O **60300*0 (I) % lisod 222:2 222:2 222:2 EIZ9E fZI9Z 0000 0fI89 EL EEZ6 Â£Â£3* luoul@OE ZZE'066 Il,L'SZ,6 Yr 6LL'(~6 9Â£~7 ELI'It'L 12 929 12,000 000 Bel w 5,702 6,302 6,447 7,2285 7,325 7,472 Training 20,382 20,790 32,200 35,230 35.935 9600 960'0 960'0 560'0 960'0 (I) % soIES/on Power Department of Estes Park ating Expenses 1,258,503 Actual .spIes IUOIJ @nu@Aol @Ill SOUIrl uqul SI lu@01@d ' I @loN dxE[ do -wasIX'ZOAN,SeogIOJ 00U8/I Cl 0 11* 0 h MI M 004Â» 1 0 M en E N CA] 01 -O 90 M enl re; 2 en ool M. -1 n U -4 0,1 00 00 00 0 0 -1 n M Â£4 -1 0 1 00 0 Mi w 1 10 041 M N N N 91 9 0% h thi t Do n N eli Ch 1 04 \01 0 -1 =f U -4 04 Q 00 M - e red en 04 7 M 0 M 0 001 0 0 MI rn M- .b. ri 91 -. M 003 41 r- 61 01 ell W 01 =fl CÂ·- -10 - Chi el M 00 39 .2 u ca 8.51 0 U K Q Â¤ CA 6 @ 8 3 9 1 99 0 24 C 2 8 - E- 23 3 0 In ~ 8, 2% .9 ra 0 $ CO - 2542 - 2 % 9 k E .9.0 0248 8 45 E.9-2- R 41 # _ 8 .8 -8 2 23 * 94. Ji rEE. i ./ 5 R E * IN - /41. 4 0 ~S ST CS - W S Cd & g 2 M * 65 A Â©4 0 ~ co A. Ul 0 - v re l. = 0 t # 0 2 0 2 W 8 H - - of Estes Park Light and Power Department Operating Expenses 2008 2009 2010 2011 Salaries 1,020,667 1,051,287 1,082,825 1,115,310 78,727 81,089 83,522 86,027 Benefits 189,143 194,817 200,662 206,682 112,248 114,493 116,783 119,119 49,213 50,198 surance 44,146 45,028 2,200 14,202 1,638,766 517,366 532,887 548,874 565,340 39,579 40,766 41,989 43,249 109,691 112,982 116,371 119,862 E9*'L9 IL9'Â£9 JOUBUOJUIEK L9Z'EI POV OIqulogIPOUfl 829'00I 608'606 fIL'9EE 906'93Â£ 98E'LIE IM'80Â£ Â£66'53 92'52 IOAâ‚¬ 88L'Â£Z ZfL '+9 95829 SZ0'I9 8*Z'6Â§ Sluu 859'Â£6 ZZ8'I6 IZO'06 992'88 SSE'05 OLE'6* foâ‚¬'8* 99Â£'Lf 899'69 ZOE'89 Â£96'99 059'59 ISZ'98 Qgg'98 Â£58'178 68I'Â£8 Â£09'EIE ZOE'LOE ZOI'IOE I06'f6Z 06!HOUE.Il JO ~ 'LEI 6EI'fEI 06*'ZEI Z68'6ZI 'luTEW QI '6L 09Â£'6L 09Â£'6L 05Â£'6L LÂ£9'Â£9 68Â£29 99I'I9 L96'65 .1UIBIN JUQUI 9 PS Â£002/8/1. mer Accounts dxE[ do .pasIX ZOAORS,0903 mr MOO eec 000 Aue - 61 M C 04 ~ St 9 21 h g 33%53 8 ~~ --4 Ch N ~ r.4 Â· ell h M 2 r.2 04 00 Chi = R went- 88888 en h V.)00 0 00 00 0%00 odded dg 000 8, 2 9 0 C.4 E.3.%.3.f. % # 6 v/ 3 94 7 v A 56 92 9 U =C 2 O 02 3 # 8. 04 9< 20 00 9, 00 *a 29 &6 3 'g. CS 0 ..3 02 64.48 .g til ig %91/.E ?3 M t' 8 2 2 :/ il 1-1 9 99 0 C y .C 2.M .3 9 8 .tl' d ts S :2 <% U=%= M M E1356 * li 13.% 3=UU Z= 4 82"im 21 ~3420<23*82 E~~21>4 of Estes Park Power Department ng Expenses 6,881 7,315 Training 22,062 23,413 cription 7,929 8,414 38,134 38,897 40,468 Subtot 1,314,744 1,343,672 1,3 3, 1 1,403,253 3,658,378 3,753,687 3,8 1,4 3,951,827 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 660'0Â§*'OI IOf'Et,Z'OI LIL'9Â£0'OI Lf0'0Â£8'6 Â£0*0 L000-0 LOOGÂ° gT~Â° 65L'890'I EZI'6*0'I 88Â¢6Z0'I * 01 5600 560'0 (I) % soIES/on 0009Z 0009Z 00009 2008 1 @I{l SOUI! 1 Ugul S ! lu@01@d I @loN dxH do Â·PCISIX ZOADIJSEOg.IOJ EOOZ/8/ I 0,1 M b O. 01 O Fl 00 + O\1 ON - 00 C 01 U W er; 00 NI =t- A 01 h e en MI N o 041 Of 1 r . - %0 01 1 Q -1 40 04 04 Ch 00 & 01 C M CO 00 4-1 00 0 0 0 0 8 75.0.11- 5. 0 0 5 MI e 1.n Â· 04 g N U 21 81 2 01 00 0 04 m Cl M 0 04 01 00 =fl h N 00 0 00 * â€¢--1 M 40 - 00 ent 0 M O t-1 n E moo. tlthlu. ra mr N O t-- h V-) chi O w Meno 00 CO Ermr N 00 O 0100 0 0 O Cl el en -- 00 0 C M - Ul M + 9. rl n enl h r. m - M Cle 00 00 M NO MOO 0 cooee 010 0 0 00010 0 00 0 000000 0 0 M 01 M M n 02 ./. O..r- O. E q N. 9101. n 00.n OeM 0 M el G O N. M Ch 00 N -t- N t- gg g el 000001Â©U 00 0 0 010 0\ an e O. nlnoo. 4 ON E M -1 U M 61 w M -1 w 00 Â¥--1 U 04 Ami AW El t-1 0. n n 91 9 5- . t< 0010 00000100 00 C 00 O 010 N h V-) r~ N \01 0 h 410 - -1 * O MOO #3 21 oot-col- 0000010-1 200 -0- Ch #O. 91-ec 01 * 0 -C 5 0 040Â©00 01 0.0-9 (11 1.5- 4 d N O-14 c. d M Ret- â‚¬91 00 Cl 0 + U e N en 91- Ch 9-1 00 N * 01 01 (-1-1 M M 000 01 g 0 0 0 010 0 00 C 0 8 0 Cleo r q n 91 N ... - M 09 N QI 1 h - -1 00 U M O 00 1 M .- 0% 04 UN<D /0 M /5. 0 0 r-Â· 0050 M r-4- 00 - 1 0 84 8 6,0 3 5 60 - . A 0 & 37 & 8 3 3 Â·4 1 3 3 .g -- 426 3 2 1 .0 4 5 8 1% R:% 2 4 - 5~&85ig_ 385&~filly 11Â£3 ca > ..1 3 m U 0 851486 882,5 519,396 551,30 578 98 605 633,552 662,742 I66'9Z6 OSL'588 EgE'9ts I IL'808 095'OLL 968'589 OZL'L08 OL'EZE'Z 00Â£'iN'I (Idsyl moIJ F}!deo I66'926 OSL'588 39Â£'9f8 IIL'808 095'OLL 968'589 OZL'L08 OL'EZE'Z 00Â£'Etâ‚¬'I papund .AO-kI }UNIn OI OI + 01 OI OI LO'O LO'O LO*O LO'O LOW LO'O LOO LOJO 0 leN ls@IoluI 22383 82 50 62,500 52,000 56,243 58,493 140649 195 000 114,00 101,75 1 111,4 116,71 82,50 95,40 98*'I65 fgI'59Â§ 666'669 Â£96'fIS 008'06+ 968'91+ OZZ'Â§617 000'*Â£5 Substations 14757 ittE~ 2~'0 00. 10,000 10,000 1 11,025 11,576 12,155 1 509725 59 00 111,000 111,000 12 126,420 1 139,378 2000 2004 2QQ5 2006 2007 105265 84 155,220 165,896 15 156,750 163,804 Capital Improve ents d Inte rest Income FI89Â£ZOL SIEEZOL Â§I89â‚¬ZO'L SISSEZO'L SIEEZO*L FIEEZO'L SISSEZO'L SIEEZO'L SISSEZO'L loloEZI }cpa PAO,I I epartment 139,00 67,50 1 5 000'LI 14370 8'09Â£ 68L6EI Â£'Etâ‚¬'I 5LZI66 Capital Requirements: (1) :suounquwo) 10UIO popund puo (0 :Supoueuai[ puoE[ SIBOA duq deosIXÂ·Z0A94SEOQIO; * ' E00U8/.I 04 000000000 -clen M O 0 0 d 00 A 0010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + coe 01 U - Cl M Â¢41 06 0000000 - cr; 00 en la lie 00*0- â‚¬ A er) ~ W 00 . 00% ./. -V 0% . 01 h 61 9 9 1.noÂ©000 M-Int-nent- en CO d MI 00 0000 - O 00 01 40 041 0. g 91-%6000 -M O 1 00 N Of 0 0.1 - en M eli COO -4 h 01 0 4 91 9 Cn 0 M 011 M C --1 00 01 M CIr* 04 4 g -1 rf,1 0-0 01 0 R' 2 A 21 N -0 01 M 01 0 (91 06' E 4 Y.1 5 -4 - >4 04 Ca i - 0 bo - u h Ch 0 00 0 # 9 1 #4 2 ME~44 0 00 0 N N N M 4->â€¢ 2 & a E ~-;Nefir 2006 2007 2009 Subtotal 298,052 299,443 301,735 299,000 302,045 300,688 297,085 298,060 298,360 298,070 Â£Â§9'LZ9- ZOf'8L9- Â£*I'85- fL'6Llr Â£24'0217- OES'OZE- 68Â£'299- SOL'69L'Z- 'LZ9- Z017'8Lg- t,L'6Lt" Â£Zf'OZf- ozg'OZE- 68Â£'Z99- OL'69L'Z- 0*'085'I- 05L'Z96- 8'ESI 6L5'Â£Â£9 ZOO'*50'I ZZ5'fLE'I ZI6'9Â£0'Z St,0'EIVOI 599'8IL'E @OUBIEEI Capital Improvements nd terest Income Princ. & Interest 297,08 0'6I 029' I E 9EZ'If LOI'I9 EZ6'8L 17II 'EZZ OUIOOUI 19010 JUI evious Years Balance 3,718,565 2,990,716 4,806,620 2,036,912 1,374,522 1,054,002 633,579 153,835 -374,348 -951,750 0.0 Â£0.0 Â£00 -0 00 90*0 90'0 Light and Power De artment Town of Estes Park 0181 16@low! %L puB UILI@l JEOX O I Oq PInoM spurIJ puoq Sgulns 'sloofoid Ieudeo 103 @IqUI.!BAE eq PInobi sonu@AN snidms Jo %OOI soums e Â·dmI 'I@mod pue 148!1 4 PP! 'Elep IDOTIols!4 JO AA@!AN Uo pos dmI deosIxÂ·Z004SBOO.[Oj 2002 2003 2005 2008 2010 2011 00Z/8/I 01 01 C 00 0 g C 01 0 00 0 R ~3Â· ~ ~= e ~ 2 0 0 6. 1jw M -4 -e a c 2 9 - .al@ 2 *6@'3 .8 n a 8 28 E & 4 00 0 --1 O U O 1% E % 2 5 W E: U DE E= 05 6 Â¤5 -2 3 ~~~~ MAN@ dd@ ~4Â£3 Town of *stes Park Light and Power Department Capital Improvements and Interest Income L PS Â£0028/1 156,271 163,303 60,833 63,266 153,665 161,348 122,184 127,905 Computer 99,695 104,181 Vehicles 159,535 167,512 6,700 7,036 10,950 11.388 LII'06Z 088'9LE 61â‚¬'SIO'I I9I'0L6 Â§68'L179 Ll,0'6I9 6*Â£'SIO'I I9I'0L6 6*Â£'9I0'I I9I'0L6 OI OI Substations 1 ~% 1~ 693,281 725,232 LO'O LOÂ·O 101qui~2 2 SISSEZO'L SISSEZO'L Capital Requirements: (1) Office, Sh6p, Stores :SUOntlq!11UO) 10 CO :Bulouuu dTuI deosIx'ZOAeRSEOOIOJ i -1 M Â©0000Â©0000 - Coo -1 M el â€ž â‚¬41 Cf 0 M 010 000000000 - MO px' t-- el CE C ..3 44 004 EON 3 Ek cn -- Ul 0-en 11 . 02 Mpd 0 2 00 0. 0 3< 2,84 0 0 0 0. C ~ M 04 N N ct >1 2 50 Z UNA 4 of Estes Park CapitaL][nwroveIne~Jsamnnte~tt Income 297,070 300,455 I Â§*'aL- 489'089- evious Years Balance -1,580,403 -2,260;988 I Â§1''Z+L- +89'089- 6Â£Â¢Â£00'Â£- 886'09*- gouer~ 989 (f) -dmI. Princ. & Interest @Alod pue 140~I Xq popIA BOLIOJS!4 JO Al@!A@I UO pOS 1 PInom SpUnJ puoq souins 91 SnIdins jo %0OI soumssv OUIOOUI 199101UI dul~ deospcÂ·ZOA@IlseogioJ 2004 200~ 2009 jon CUSTOMER NOTICE PROPOSED ELECTRIC RAT E INCREASE CONTAINING A SUMMARY OF ELECTRIC RAT E CHANGES & SUBSEQUENT CUSTOMER CORRESPONDENCE (2) +4~444-\ NOTICE OF PROPOSED RATE MODIFICATIONS 1 TO THE ELECTRIC RATES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK,-COLORADO N<40*ap- December 13, 2002 A proposed modification of the Town ofEstes Park's ("the Town") electric rate schedules, resulting in an increase affecting all such rates, will be considered by the Town's Board of Trustees at a public hearing. Any electric customer of the Town may appear, either personally or through counsel, at the public hearing to provide testimony or comment regarding the proposed modifications. This hearing will be held at: â€¢ TIME: 7 p.m. â€¢ DATE: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 â€¢ PLACE: The Town Board Room located in the Municipal Building at 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado The rate increase is proposed to be implemented in two phases, with the first proposed increase effective February 1, 2003 and the second proposed increase effective January 1, 2004. These proposed modifications will affect the electric rates of all customers of the Town of Estes Park. In addition, all rate classifications shall be subject to a Purchase Power Rider which will pass on any increase resulting from changes in the Platte River Power Authority base electric rates to the Town. The purpose of the modifications is to implement the recommendations of the recently completed rate study performed by M.E. Kiburz and Associates, the rate consultant to the Town. The modifications would adjust base rates to account for changes in the Town's cost of serving each rate class, the current cost of wholesale power, and the adjustment of demandÂ· rates to reflect the current electric usage in the system. The cost to each individual customer will depend upon the type of service received and monthly consumption. The proposed changes will apply to all customers of the Town, whether they are located inside or outside the municipal boundaries ofthe Town. You are hereby also advised that the entire proposed modified rate schedules, existing rate schedules, and the rate study are available for public inspection at the offices of the Light and Power Department, Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park Colorado, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. The information is also posted on the Town's web site at www.estesnet.com/LightPower/Rate%20modifications.htm. A summary of the proposed rate modifications is included with this notice. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact the Light and Power Department at the Estes Park Municipal Building or call (970) 577-3588 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: 72-Â«*,t/L g'~L-96.- Richard E. Matzke Light and Power Director r- 9- r- 00 O - 0 (D CO N 00 009 0 5 N . r- COO ' Lfi r CO g 0 Or N 00 00 69 69 64 0 g< fE Z 0 @R % te 0 O CD =1 1 tz 49. r.- CO CO 0 00 a &.C CD (0 3 3 Sh' So O 0 0 Â£ c.c, 2 O O 0 0 te 64 69 68 OLLIOâ‚¬4 O) M m 0 - 0 0 LO (9 N CON O AN Lo O 0 9 26 8 0 0 . 4- 0, C) r h N A @BiNg E E 8 6 3 0 8 0 00 - Lo (D N CN 2 E 00 00 CO (D AN 00 00 0) O 000 0 0 0 00 O 00 g~Zj* do 0 ug 000 00 0 00 0 00 LUOUS te e te e + te <6 0 te 0 64 e .9 69 0 Â£ 0 0 0 0 8 O O 0 0 oc .000 0 00088 Â¢9 91- 1 CO 10 Lo M LO LO tO ID A AN 00 â‚¬,9 69 e ca .9 0 63 99 0.93 Â·â‚¬,3 â‚¬0>64 000 .C J 2 w - CD -C (9 CD (D LO C = S 2-22 CD ~ J 3 9% . 2 0 Â£ = 6 022 AC>4 - 0 0 eco e 8 82 E.Â§ > O AC>4 m CO .L p O@ i; &E 9 E.2 9 liwi (D m C E E 2 2 Ill Ul 3 16 '9 0â‚¬ 8 1 0 0 -0 EE E E- 0 =30 G 0 0 =EE 0 -a E E E~ 12 EE 2-my > 1- m m C Â£0<0 Of< <-mu) 05<<CO (0< O U) CO U) < -33 LO 0 te 69 0 60 0 â‚¬4 0 .. 1.0 Lo Lo LO to 9- , CN â‚¬0, E > eD 4- 2 0 0 00 MCN A Peak Winter Summer Average ustomer Demand Demand Monthly 99 of?810'0$ eue Su!sn BJewolsno le!luepise] ile ojelqelleA â‚¬003 2004 $7.89 NA 141.94 Charge Bill Current Available to a 'lZZ'~tl~trt;2 ove~ 15, $7.15 $3 2003 Available to all residential customers over 15, $7.15 $1 0.22 Cu ent i ble to all residential customers us'ng ene t 000 $0.02550 $76.65 OOLâ‚¬0.0 allies Estes Park Electric Rate Summary Current Cul~#:51=Jaota~'prE:%112% 28:Kzund r esiden ial 2003 Available to all reside ntial customers adr esiden ial electric heat up to 25,000 kWh annuall SZ Z$ efeiols ABJelle Bu!sn sieuloisno I A luenno nually and residential with electric heat (Se Aea-Jo-eul!1 Ableua le!0Jell,WOO Ssel JO M)1 9Â£ Jo spuel.1.11~~!~aljg~q ~o~d~ 3 Mead-uo LIMM 000'91 Jepun lee4 eoeds oploele puel,UeP 41!M SJell.lolsno le!0]el.Ulll00 lie luelln0 Residential Demand Jeeq eoeds 0!408 le!1 ep!se.I lie 01 el â‚¬002 le!3.lelillu Residential annually and allies â‚¬001 2004 Same $40.01 GLUE *OOZ t'OOE cO M CD>% U.2 el N (9 00 *ga h 00 (C. 00 ON 64 64 64 2 0 0 N N C) 1.0 W. ulat : 10 2 2* O 0 e 14 66 66 68 64 64 0 = M OofA O 0 CNN a) LO 3 ula) : 10 0, C) 03 64 69 64 1- r- r- 911 =r = M 60 64 64 ta ve O A Lo o 7 4- UD 0*(D= 1 to CO 0 00 M N N fc=Ae 0 do O LU OG 64 64 69 r 00 03 -00 ~ (9(9 2 LOG) r- CO l.0 1-0 00 O 1.0 00 0 0 0 ir, .- - h .- 911 a & -C 0 ON 0) ON ~ LOCO - hoo ~ CON N e (9 10 (\lai CO (9 M - r- r- O 00 0 00 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 00 d 00 00 111066 64 64 64 64 6464 2 eau. 64 tee 2 6964 (D Â£ < 8.8. gg 0 0 0 to 00 ID LO U) C 0Â§ 0. 0.0. â„¢ ,(N < 00 z 22 91 1 AN Z 00 e> 89 eate 2 6464 4 eeg ' 69 64 00â‚¬A (D 2 2 0 - 5 5 E o 6 -C CD CD tf N NRE ~~E 3 * .29* CD 0 0.2 42 4- a) C= .ME 0 1% -8 2-8 -6 0 2. C m .83 Ja -S M= E w o b 2 M 0 2 & .92 -5 151 a. co m c Â® 8 Z m C% 8 Em C 8 -C 0 -5 -2 2 -M O C .*tO CE 3-Oe 020 E o = - 0 -- CA N~'16-1 282 0 % & 3%%Â® 0 &5 851 0 0 5% . m (0 0 =@$3SS *3~3%%% *1~35%% 05 <=LUCOU) 05< u) co-000 05< 05 miumu) 2 -'j 00) Er % CD * 0 Mt i (91 00 00 4 00 & 00 b 00 00 00 00 00 OO M CNI N (N N N J N N N N O 0 0 0 rrent Available to commercial customers with dema 0.70 $10.70 $568.73 0.70 $10.70 $591.25 1.17 $11.17 $615.67 Rocky Mountain National Park re $34.61 L L'Zâ‚¬$ 09'6Â£$ LE- KLL$ 09'9LL$ 11'062$ â‚¬Ft'$ EL.#$ 9!uil.Upe >ped leuogieN uiejunoIN XM 89'0EL$ 6â‚¬'ELES 48.8Â£Â£$ k Winter Summer ustomer Demand Estes Park Ele ate Summary Jo 00Jnos eleu.lelle ue eAe4 40!4M slunoooe eo 1!AA elsxs 0!40ele >lied sels3 841 01 A.leA!lap JOJ elq Larqe Commercial Time-of-Dav inistrative Housing eA!,e.lisill!Ulpv IleWS eA!lens!u!Ulpv eer,neacteXULTZmof power a able to the Est Ssel JO Large Commercial Current Available to commercial mers with M)19Â£ Bulpeeoxe spu 35 kW Notice of Proposed Electric Rate Modifications Town of Estes Park Customer Energy Average Charge Charge Monthly $/Month $/kWh Bill Municipal Rate Current Available for municipal street, park lighting, and buildings $0.06216 $254.86 2003 $0.06602 $270.67 2004 $0.07012 $287.48 Outdoor Area Lighting Current Available for lighting outdoor private areas $5.25 $5.25 2003 $6.32 $6.32 2004 $7.61 $7.61 Wind Enerqv Surcharae (NEW) 2003 Available to all residential and commercial customers (PRPA $0.02500 wind surcharge plus $0.001/kWh) 2004 Same $0.02500 Proposed Changes Include: â€¢ Combined rate changes will result in an average 6.25% increase effective 2/1/2003 and an additional average increase of 6.25% effective 1/1/2004. â€¢ Residential Time-of-Day rate (with demand charge) will be eliminated â€¢ The winter season for the Residential Energy Basic Time-of-Day, and Residential Demand will be extended to include April and September. The energy charge for these rates during summer season will revert to standard Residential rate. â€¢ Holidays considered as off-peak for Time-of-Day rates will include Christmas Eve â€¢ Combined billing option for Large Commercial, Large Commercial Time-of-Day, and RMNP Large Administrative rates will be eliminated. â€¢ A new Residential Energy Basic Time-of-Day rate will be proposed. On-peak hours for the new Residential Energy Basic Time-of-Day rate will be 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. All other hours shall be considered off-peak for the new Residential Energy Basic Time-of-Day rate. â€¢ A new optional Wind Energy Surcharge rate will be proposed. ** ******* Name: Franklin R. Crone ysicalAddress: 6782 Co Rd 43 MailingAddress: Box 101 City: Glen Haven 1Is-I03 State: CO Zip: 80532 Phone: 970-586-9012 Email: rsgfineart@aol.com Comment: 1 Subject:Electric Rate Increase Well we have not had a rate increase in quite sometime, it would be great if we did not have to have one now. It seems to me that RMNP are not paying for there fair share. At the rate that they are charged, conservation is probably not on their genda. It appears that you are saying that they have a way of their own f applying their own source of power to our grid. I say tough, if they want to use electric off this grid, they must pay a more just rate like the other users. If they don't, let them get itdirect from their own source and to quit taking advantage of us, the people that pay to use and MAINTAIN this system. Sincerely, Franklin Crone ************************************************************************ ******* Name: Steve and Barbara Klett PhysicalAddress: 1776F Olympian Lane MailingAddress: 1776F Olympian Lane 9 City: Estes Park State: CO Zip: 80517 Phone: 970-586-1836 Email: sklett1943@aol.com Comment: January 6,2003 Mayor Baudek and Trustees of Estes Park: Considering the poor economy'and hdw many of us are struggling with day to day expenses it seems an inappropriate time to propose a raise in electric rates. Also, Wind Power should be encouraged with the minimal increase in cost shared by everyone rather than penalize those who volunteer to pay for this clean and renewable energy source. It seems to me with the increase in the population and resulting , increase in electric utility customers that enough additional income to' the Town of Estes Park is generated to keep the rates where they dre. The Estes Park News this past weekend basically said: $50,000 a month in profit to the Town certainly is a Golden Goose that should be shared with the residents of Estes Park as low electric rates. Also, have expenses incredsed to the point where a rate increase is justified? Unless the Town of Estes Park can prove to its citizens that it cannot run the Electric Dept. without an increase in funding then this rate increase simply amounts to a tax increase to the residents of Estes Park. It's time this local government pulled in their belt just like the rest of us have to in this economy. ORDINANCE #2-03 EXHIBIT "A " = OFFICIAL RATE SCHEDULES ORDINANCE NO. 2-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has determined that it is necessary to amend the Light and Power Rate Schedules of the Town of Estes Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1: That the Light and Power Rate Schedules shall be amended as more fully set forth on Exhibit "A". Section 2: These rate schedules will take effect February 1, 2003. Section 3: In the opinion of the Board of Trustees an emergency exists, this Ordinance shall take effect after its passage, adoption, and signature of the Mayor. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF 2003. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 14th day of January, 2003 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2003, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk EXHIBIT "A" LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Generally The schedule of rates set forth in this Chapter for the service of electric power and energy by the Town shall remain in effect until repealed or amended. None of the rates are available for resale service. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) Definitions Commercial service is defined as an electric customer whose majority of use is for commercial use including, but not limited to, the following: a. Commercial accommodations; b. Retail sales; c. Bed and breakfast; d. Restaurants; e. Campgrounds; f. Schools and churches; g. Governmental and utility agencies; and h. Service businesses. For purposes of the Light & Power rate schedules, a commercial accommodation shall include any dwelling or accommodation unit or units that are rented for a period of less than thirty (30) days during any portion of a calendar year. Residential service is defined as an electric customer whose majority of use is residential, excluding uses listed in the definition of commercial service. Residential service (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to residential customers for all domestic uses in individually metered single-family private dwellings or individually metered apartments, except customers having electric heat as a primary or auxiliary energy source for space heating with annual consumption greater than twenty-five thousand (25,000) kWh. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer charge $4.00 $4.00 Energy charge per kWh $0.06663 $0.07203 (d) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (e) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. 1 (f) Conditions of service. Service proVided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies, and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. (g) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 2-92, Â§1, 1992; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) 2 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Ik. Residential Service: Demand; Metered (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to residential customers having electric heat as a primary or auxiliary energy source for space heating in individually metered single-family private dwellings or individually metered apartments. This schedule is also available for those residential customers who do not have electric heat as a primary or auxiliary energy source for space heating, but whose annual energy consumption is over fifteen thousand (15,000) kWh. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer charge $5.00 $5.00 Winter season September 1-April 30 Demand charge per kW ofbilling demand: $7.15 $7.89 Energy charge per kWh $0.03360 $0.03663 Summer Season May 1 -August 31 Energy charge per kWh $0.06663 $0.07203 (d) Detennination of billing demand. The billing demand shall be determined by suitable meter measurement of the highest fifteen-minute integrated demand occurring during the monthly billing period. (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (f) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (g) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies, and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. Any account receiving service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for a minimum of twelve (12) months. (11) Summer rate will be in effect beginning with the first regular meter reading after April 308 and continuing until the first regular meter reading prior to September lst. 3 (i) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 2-92 Â§2, 1992; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) . 4 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Residential Service; Time of Day (ELIMINATE) (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to all residential customers who use energy storage equipment for electric space heating and whose annual energy consumption is over fifteen thousand (15,000) kWh. (c) Monthly rate. Customer charge $3.00 Demand charge: On-peak period: All kW ofmaximum demand in the billing period per kW Winter season October 1 --March 31 8:00 Summer season April 1--September 306.00 Off-peak period No demand charge Energy charge: On-peak period: All kWh used on-peak in the billing period, per kWh 0.03085 Off-peak period: All kWh used off-peak in the billing period, per kWh 0.0255 (d) Time-of-day hours. The on- and off-peak periods shall be as follows: (1) On-peak period: between 6:00 am and 1:00 p.m. and between 3:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays. (2) Off-peak period: between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. and between 10:00 p.m. and the succeeding 6:00 a.m. on weekdays and all hours on weekends and holidays. (3) Holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 5 (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (f) Determination of demand. The billing demand shall be determined by suitable meter measurement of the highest fifteen-minute integrated demand occurring during the monthly on-peak period. (g) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (h) Conditions of service. (1) Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies, and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. The customer may be required to pay for special metering costs over and above single-phase self-contained metering. (2) Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for a minimum of twelve (12) months. (a) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) 6 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Residential Service: Energv Time of Day (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to all residential customers who use energy storage equipment for electric space heating. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer charge $5.00 $5.00 Energy charge: On-peak period: All kWh used on-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.08066 $0.08760 Off-peak period: All kWh used off-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.02850 $0.03100 (d) Time-of-day hours. The on- and off-peak periods shall be as follows: (1) On-peak period: between 6:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and between 3:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays. (2) Off-peak period: between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. and between 10:00 p.m. and the succeeding 6:00 a.m. on weekdays and all hours on weekends and holidays. (3) Holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (f) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. (g) Conditions of service. Service provided underthis rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for a minimum of twelve (12) months. The customer may be required to pay for special metering costs over and above single-phase self-contained metering. 7 (h) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993; Ord. 8-96 Â§1(part), 1996) 8 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Residential Service: Basic Energv Time of Dav (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to all residential customers. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer dharge $5.00 $5.00 Winter period September 1-April 30 Energy charge: On-peak period: All kWh used on-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.07995 $0.08643 Off-peak period: All kWh used off-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.06330 $0.06843 Summer period May 1-August 31 Energy charge per kWh $0.06663 $0.07203 (d) Time-of-day hours. The on- and off-peak periods shall be as follows: (1) On-peak period: between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays. (2) Off-peak period: between 7:00 p.m. and the succeeding 4:00 p.m. on weekdays and all hours on weekends and holidays. (3) Holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (f) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10 days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (g) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for a minimum of twelve (12) months. The customer may be required to pay for special metering costs over and above single-phase self-contained metering. 9 r (h) Summer rate will be in effect beginning with the first regular meter reading after April 3 Oth and continuing until the first regular meter mailing prior to September (i) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993; 10 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Small Commercial Service (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available for business lighting and small power loads of thirty-five (35) kW maximum demands or less. All service will be supplied only through a single meter. This service is available at single- or three-phase at the established voltage of either the Town's primary or secondary distribution system. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer charge $7.25 $7.25 Energy charge per kWh $0.07198 $0.07517 (d) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (e) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. The foregoing schedule shall be net where service is metered at secondary voltage of the Town's distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the customer shall receive a credit of two percent (2%) of,the monthly bill, less the customer charge. (f) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Departinent general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff - sheets on file. (h) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 292 Â§Â§3,4, 1992; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part),1993) 11 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Small Commercial Service: Energy Time of Dav (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service ten'itory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to all small commercial customers who use energy storage equipment for electric space heating and have on-peak demands of thirty-five (35) kW or less. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer charge $8.25 $8.25 Energy charge: On-peak period: All kWh used on-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.08717 $0.09277 Off-peak period: All kWh used off-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.02850 $0.03100 (d) Time-of-day hours. The on- and off-peak periods shall be as follows: (1) On-peak period: between 6:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. and between 3:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays. (2) Off-peak period: between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. and between 10:00 p.m. and the succeeding 6:00 a.m. on weekdays and all hours on weekends and holidays. (3) Holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christnhas Eve and Christmas Day. (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (f) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. The foregoing schedule shall be net where service is metered at secondary voltage ofthe Town's distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the customer shall receive a credit of two percent (2%) of the monthly bill less the customer charge. (g) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and 12 extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule a minimum of twelve (12) months. The customer may be required to pay for special metering costs over and above single-phase self-contained metering. (h) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993; Ord. 8-96 Â§1(part), 1996) 13 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Large Commercial Service (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is required for electric lighting and power requirements of customers having maximum demands exceeding thirty-five (35) kW in any two (2) consecutive months. All service will be supplied only through a single meter. This service is available at single- or three-phase at the established voltage of either the Town's primary or secondary distribution system. (c) Monthly rate, 2003 2004 Customer charge $10.00 $10.00 Demand charge per kW $ 9.52 $ 9.92 Energy charge per kWh $0.03081 $0.03208 (d) Determination of billing demand. The billing demand shall be determined by suitable meter measurement of the highest fifteen-minute integrated demand occurring during the monthly billing period. (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be $75.00. (f) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (g) Conditions of service. (1) Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies, and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. The customer may be required to pay for special metering costs over and above single-phase self-coiitained metering. (2) The customers shall be required to properly balance their loads. If the power factor during the time the billing demand is established falls below ninety-five percent (95%) lagging, adjustment may be made by increasing the measured demand for each month by one percent (1%) for each one percent (1%) or major fraction thereof by which the power factor during the billing period is less than ninety-five percent (95%) lagging. (3) The foregoing schedule shall be net where service is metered at the secondary voltage of the Town's distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the customer shall receive a 14 credit of two percent (2%) of the monthly.bill for service. Where service is taken at the Town's established primary voltage and the customer furnishes the transformers and distribution system, the customer shall receive a credit of four percent (4%) of the monthly bill. (4) Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for a minimum oftwelve (12) months. (h) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 2-92 Â§5, 1992; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993; Ord. 8-96 Â§1(part), 1996) 15 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Large Commercial Service: Time of Dav (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available for electric light and power requirements of customers having maximum demands exceeding thirty-five (35) kW in any two (2) consecutive months. All service will be supplied only through a single meter. This service is available at single- or three-phase at the established voltage of either the Town's primary or secondary distribution system. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Customer charge $12.00 $12.00 Demand charge: On-peak period: All kW of maximum demand (including power factor cost adjustment) in the billing period, per kW $10.70 $11.17 Off-peak period No demand charge Energy charge: On-peak period: All kWh used on-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.03081 $0.03208 Off-peak period: All kWh used off-peak in the billing period, per kWh $0.02545 $0.02650 (d) Time-of-day hours. The on- and off-peak periods shall be as follows: (1) On-peak period: between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays. (2) Off-peak period: between 10:00 p.m. and the succeeding 6:00 a.m. on weekdays and all hours on weekends and holidays. (3) Holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. (e) Determination of billing demand. The billing demand shall be determined by suitable meter measurement of the highest fifteen-minute integrated demand occurring during the monthly on-peak period. 16 + (f) Monthly miniihum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be $75.00. (g) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (h) Conditions of service. (1) Service provided under this rate schedule shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies, and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. The customer may be required to pay for special metering costs over and above single-phase self-contained metering. (2) The customers shall be required to properly balance their loads. (3) If the power factor during the time the billing demand is established falls below ninety-five percent (95%) lagging, adjustment may be made by increasing the measured demand for each month by one percent (1%) for each one percent (1%) or major fraction thereof by which the power factor during the billing period is less than ninety-five percent (95%) lagging. (4) The foregoing schedule shall be net where service is metered at the secondary voltage of the Town's distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the customer shall receive a credit of two percent (2%) of the monthly bill for service. Where service is taken at the Town's established primary voltage and the customer furnishes the transformers and distribution system, the customer shall receive a credit of four percent (4%) of the monthly bill. (5) Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for a minimum of twelve (12) months. (i) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 2-92 Â§6, 1992; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part),1993) 17 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Municipal Service (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. Available for municipal street, park lighting and buildings as provided to the Town. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 All kWh used, per kWh $0.06602 $0.07012 (d) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Wind Energv Surcharge (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. Available for any electric customer ofthe Town of Estes Park. (c) Monthly rate. (in additional normal electric rate) Platte River Power Authority Tariff-Schedule 7: Wind Energy Service charge per kilowatt-hour ($0.024 per kilowatt-hour effective 2/1/2002) plus $0.001 per kilowatt-hour. 18 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Purchased Power Rider (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory to all electric rate schedules. (b) Purpose. This schedule is to pass on the estimated cost change resulting from changes in the Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) base electric rates, which are applicable to service to the Town. (c) Method of determining the rider. (1) Formula for determining the purchased power rider: Purchased Power Rider = (New PRPA rate cost - Current PRPA cost) kWh sales Current PRPA cost = The most recent twelve months' cost of power purchased from PRPA by the Town, estimated using the rates effective January 1, 2002. kWh sales = The electric kWh sales to the Town's customers for the same twelve-month period as the current PRPA cost. New PRPA cost = The calculated cost of power, assuming the power purchased for the same twelve-month period as used for the current PRPA costs and the proposed PRPA rates. (2) The purchased power rider shall be calculated to the nearest one-hundredth ofa mill ($0.00001) perkWh. (3) The electric ratd schedules with demand rates may have the purchased power rider spread between the energy and the demand rates. The demand portion shall be set as $/kW. (Ord. 21-91 Â§1(part), 1991; Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) 19 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Outdoor area lighting (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to any customer for the lighting of private outdoor areas, where such service can be provided directly from existing secondary distribution lines of the Light & Power Department. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Per lighting fixture $6.32 $7.61 (d) Payment. The above rate is net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (e) Purchased power rider. This schedule is subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (1) The customer shall apply to the Town for this service. The customer shall provide such information as necessary for the Town to evaluate the request for service, including number and location of all fixtures and all neighboring structures, including structures located offthe premises ofthe customer. The Town shall review the application and may grant the request for service in its sole discretion. (2) The customer shall be required to deposit with the Town the estimate of the cost of installation of the outdoor area lighting equipment, including all equipment and labor charges. The customer shall deposit such sum with the Town prior to commencement of installation of this service. The Light and Power Department shall have the right to make modifications to the equipment and plan in accordance with good engineering practice. In the event all costs of installation are either greater or less than the amount deposited by the customer, the difference shall be reflected in the customer's subsequent electric bill. (3) All materials and equipment furnished and installed shall be the property of the Light and Power Department. The Light and Power Department shall have a reasonable time after the termination of service to disconnect area lighting facilities and remove the same from the premises. All costs of the removal of this system shall be the responsibility of the customer and shall be reflected on the customer's subsequent electric bill. 20 (4) The term burning dusk to dawn as used herein shall be construed to mean that all lamps shall be lighted by automdtic control equipment from approximately sunset to sunrise. (5) The customer shall notify the Light and Power Department of any service failure. Burned out lamps shall be replaced as soon as practicable, subject to Light and Power Department operating schedules, aher notification by the customer of service failure. All maintenance, including replacement of lamps, will be accomplished during regular working hours. No credit shall be allowed on the customer's monthly bill for lamp outages. (6) All service under this schedule shall be for a minimum of one (1) year and thereafter until termination. Termination shall be effective five (5) days following the receipt of written notice by the Light and Power Department of the request for termination by the customer. (7) In the event maintenance is required to the outdoor area lighting for more than normal wear and tear, the Town may terminate this service. (Ord. 19-93 Â§1(part), 1993) 21 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Rocky Mountain National Park Administrative Housing Service (without electric power) (Ord. 25-95) (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to Rocky Mountain National Park service for administrative single housing accounts who have an alternate source of electric power (including an adjustment for losses) to be delivered over the Estes Park electric system. (c) Monthly rate: 2003 2004 Customer charge $4.00 $4.00 Energy charge per kWh $0.02593 $0.02803 (d) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (e) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. (f) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. (g) Purchased power rider. This schedule is not subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 25-95 Â§1(part), 1995) 22 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Rocky Mountain National Park Small Administrative Service (without electric power) (Ord. 25-95) (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory (b) Availability. This schedule is available to Rocky Mountain National Park administrative service accounts who have an alternate source of electric power (including an adjustment for losses) to be delivered over the Estes Park electric system and who have lighting and small power loads of thirty-five (35) kW maximum demands or less. All service will be supplied only through a single meter. This service is available at single- or three-phase at established voltages available at either the Town's primary or secondary distribution system. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Custonner charge $7.25 $7.25 Energy charge per kWh $0.03715 $0.03879 (d) Monthly minimum bill. This monthly minimum bill shall be the customer charge. (e) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery of the bill. The foregoing schedule shall be net where service is metered at secondary voltage of the Town's distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the customer shall receive a credit of two percent (2%) of the monthly bill less the customer charge. (f) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. (g) Purchasdd power rider. This schedule is not subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 25-95 Â§1(part), 1995) 23 LIGHT AND POWER RATE SCHEDULES Rocky Mountain National Park Large Administrative Service (without electric power) (Ord. 25-95,8-96) (a) Applicability. The rates set forth in this Section shall be applicable in Estes Park service territory. (b) Availability. This schedule is available to Rocky Mountain National Park large administrative service accounts who have an alternate source of electric power (including an adjustment for losses) to be delivered over the Estes Park electric system and who have maximum demands exceeding thirty-five (35) kW in any two (2) consecutive months. All service will be supplied oilly through a single meter This service is available at single- or three-phase at the established voltage of either the Town's primary or secondary distribution system. This schedule is not available for resale service. (c) Monthly rate. 2003 2004 Custorner charge $10.00 $10.00 Demand charge per kW $ 4.19 $ 4.55 Energy charge per kWh $0.01613 $0.01745 (d) Determination of billing demand. The billing demand shall be determined by suitable meter measurement of the highest fifteen-minute integrated demand occurring during the monthly billing period. (e) Monthly minimum bill. The monthly minimum bill shall be $55.00. (f) Payment. The above rates are net. Bills for electric service are due and payable within ten (10) days subsequent to mailing or delivery ofthe bill. (g) Conditions of service. Service provided under this rate shall be subject to all Light and Power Department general and specific rules and regulations and extension policies and such rules and regulations as set forth in appropriate tariff sheets on file. The customers shall be required to properly balance their loads. Ifthe power factor during the time the billing demand is established falls below ninety-five percent (95%) lagging, the Light and Power Department may require the customer to correct the power factor and/or have the alternate electric power supplier provide the corrective reactive power. The foregoing schedule shall be net where service is metered at the secondary voltage of the Town's distribution system. Where service is metered under this schedule at primary voltage, the customer shall receive a credit of two percent (2%) of the monthly bill for service. Any account requesting service under this schedule shall be required to remain on this schedule for no less than twelve (12) months. 24 (h) Purchased power rider. This schedule is not subject to the conditions set forth on the purchased power rider. (Ord. 25-95 Â§1(part), 1995; Ord. 8-96 Â§1(part), 1996) 25 January 2003 PROCEDURE FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION NEW LIQUOR LICENSE MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on the application of Joshua B. Henderson, dba THE REDSTONE RESTAURANT, for a New Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License located at 225 W. Riverside Dr. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the facts and evidence determined as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type and availability of liquor outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consideration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed. This public hearing will be conducted in the following manner: 0 The applicant will be allowed to state his case and present any evidence he wishes to support his application. 0 The opponents will be given an opportunity to state their case and present any evidence in opposition to the application. 0 The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal limited to the evidence presented by the opponents. No new evidence may be submitted. C] The opponents will be allowed a rebuttal which may only rebut the evidence of the applicants. No new evidence may be offered. Il The Board of Trustees may ask any questions of any person speaking at any time during the course of this hearing. TOWN CLERK. Will present the application and confirm the following: 4 The application was filed November 18, 2002. 0 At a meeting of the Board of Trustees on November 26,2002, the public hearing was set for 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 14, 2003. Pr The neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of this application and hearing were established to be 3.01 miles. E' The Town has received all necessary fees and hearing costs. 0* The applicant is filing as a Individual. E The property is zoned C-D which allows this type of business as a permitted use. 1 The notice of hearing was published on January 3,2003 . 1 The premises was posted on Januarv 3,2003. M There is a police report with regard to the investigation of the applicant. 9/ 2' Status of T.I.P.S. Training: X Unscheduled Scheduled Completed (Date: ) 4 There is a map indicating all liquor outlets presently in the Town of Estes Park available upon request. MAYOR. 0 Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application, and if so, to read all communication. o Indicate that all evidence preserited will be accepted as part of the record. 0 Ask the Board if they have any further comments or questions. Declare the public hearing closed. SUGGESTED MOTION: Finding. The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are/are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are/are not for the granting of this liquor license. Motion. Based upon the above findings, I move that this license be granted/denied. PETITION The undersigned hereby petition the Town of Estes Park and Rtate Colorado to grant the Application of 77, Ads#Â·on t &*ura,nt Â· Clbshue Henderson, App/,canl for a HOW 4 Krfputrant LÂ£Eun r Licens and state and verffy that: they are residents or owners of a busine located at ,&35 \N ..12."/86f /14 IDE,- , Estes Park; they a over 21; they desire this Application be granted, and they belie there is a need for this type of liquor outlet in said neighborhood Name Address (Plpase sign clearly) (Please use street address a 4- il PAP> include Estes Park, CO) 59 f 14@ i,14- PY y E It / X.131 4 U An '~ f.0.6. 8-11 C, P. ' i C o C /3/ Ch '2'e>C;)98.2 eeg. re . 924 1 2741.?*Horn -l GrCU , EP Co BC -21 Â·Â· 5415 N. 9.1 g.9,4 Ge co ~ 24'1~'~~~*>i~*f~tFZ --va t>U -,Att, P l, *, 6,< :3, r-;, cd:. P-l Â£6 <re, LL( 09 Â¢ r.1 0-./ . i re*16-+rk (RiE?nkÂ«k 1 -1 Â©,042 rs 4 95 tÂ·ld V 34, 51= s D:la (-ALL, %/9 b.-- De e.;10 J 5-Â¥.ss M Â£,t..9,i zf 1) l 1 9 7/91â‚¬6*nbE Â£ 4 9 8 809 459 s E-des Rrk, U A 0 ./ 1 -* /1 ; 1 f d I ruP 4-+- p 0%06 4(ittl. ck ie r O 1.Â« (fAal_ J po 4.ti'F EP CO i (Le.. 6-1~ 9 1 aud. EP G *-1**9* , 7,5 Eny-, ( 091 ~fr) ane.-a It(,Uk 51 4 4 /u m 6/ju . 1 + 51145/ 1*u*-044~* r -40 32.2 Po 80< 1 649 6 .fÂ· C,j bs,7 - - 1- 060 2>*6Â·L Coict E R Co trflt,i:*g 4Kg 18/ 0 Verification The undersigned hereby verifies that they are over the age of 21, tk they circulated the foregoing Petition, that they witnessed the abc signatures, and they explained the license appiicatiop and t,7e genel nature of the business to those who signed. # . 1; 41*lature N STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF LARIMER ) Subscribed and sworn to before me this /074 day of.)4.J,46/ ..+91_, by --39 64 Nee.Is~,ws,- i 2 001 My commission expires: 94+04 , Ndtary P+ME - AÂ·. -It# Ly.j TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department -42*twiN*Li.. 0.* 3*k ?2=, ~.L,4~je.43?=1 /=Ece/At;y, 1,Â¥:19 VÂ¥ 3,=-*44â€ž,~rvz Â·Â»--=32 # WeeÂ¥.9 %Am/dat<*M 4 d '- Â·Â·**~'Â¢Cqi â€¢'0/Al b.Â·B>- <4 5-1.<rvs*/ANS Al/ms~SM#Y- -(-- --4 ~,'VÂ·Â·, 7,5 '.iâ€¢-aNÂ¢â€¢7~VÂ· t,ji/Â» 1#4-2.E ..9-1.-2bll/*.1.4 04* ---1 December 20,2002 Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: The Redstone Restaurant Hotel & Restaurant Henderson, Joshua B. DOB: 05/25/73 Dear Ms. van Deutekom: An Estes Park Police Department local records check based upon the name and date of birth on the above-named individual has been made. â€¢ 070498 Joshua Henderson was the suspect in an assault â€¢ 062901 Joshua Henderson was arrested for Driving Under the Influence and was booked into the Larimer County Detention Center Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for The Redstone Restaurant. Sincerely, dia# Lul <~~/Cowell C. Richardson Chief of Police, Estes Park Police Department LR:bw (970) 586-4465 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (970) 586-4496 U /79 TOWN OF ESTES PARK -/44..... 1 044/WK,1-20' 3 89(002*31*4rk . 00&24r ' =202*fr ./ -- 1 ./- <' 4 64,r - --1 January 6,2003 Joshua B. Henderson P. O. Box 971 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Josh: Enclosed is a copy of the Procedure for Hearing on Application for a New Liquor License and a copy of the findings of investigation by the Police Department. Please note that the public hearing will be held January 14~ at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room. According to the Police Department, your DUI charge was reduced from to DWAI, you paid a $100 fine, and were placed on a one year probation with alcohol evaluation and treatment. It appears that the probation period was over this past October, 2002. Please be advised that this information may be discussed at the Public Hearing. You will notice on page two of the procedure for hearing that the status of your T.I.P.S. training is unknown. We anticipate scheduling a T.I.P.S. training class in the spring and will contact you once the details are confirmed. , Please give me a call at 577-3703 if you have any questions concerning the attached. Sincerely, TOWN OF ESTES PARK Rebecca van Deutekom, CMC Deputy Town Clerk Enclosures http:#www. estesnet.com. (970) 586-5331 â€¢ RO. BOX 1200 â€¢ 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢FAX (970) 586-2816 DR 8404 (06/02) Page 1 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION COLORADO LIQUOR DENVER CO 80261 OR 3.2% FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE RETAIL LICENSE APPLICATION 1~1. NEW LICENSE [3 TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP m LICENSE RENEWAL Â· ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN Â· APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) Â· LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ â€¢ APPLICANT SHOULD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COLORADO UQUOR AND BEER CODE(Call 303-321-4164) DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 1. Applicant is applying as a t~_Individual E] Corporation j Limited Liability Company U Partnership (includes Limited Liability and Husband and Wife Partnerships) U Association or Other 2. Name of Applic,nt(s) I partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Fein Number lrÂ£iA 114% 2N5bVL 28.Trade.Name df Establishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. ~sinffs Telephone -1\AL 'Rf;P40bRE INes~TpÂ©<*~t\Â· 12-60407-Â©000 (970)â‚¬39 ',62,0lct - I 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) 225 \N'Â·fA,4Â«9\Dâ‚¬ De-- City, -, /7 County ta e i ZIP Code t*WD'i'*Â« LARHEr lb\%*to 5*\1 4. Â¥*3419 er and Street) City or Town A State , I ZIP Code f*\0 -Tprrw/ Fi,lic<vi' 8cs'1 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following questions: Present Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Class of License Present Expiration Date LIAB-,4?*R/d#fSECTION At\NoiifeflitiddbldicAPPLICATION FEES** 4-IABS 32@2*3?0%5SECTION'03****UktOQUOR'LICENSE FEES iDA-*:lit: 0 1 Application Fee for New License ............................. 900.00 ~9401 El Retail Liquor Store License (city) ......................... $227.50 44/ ..00 ~~Application Fee-New License Concurrent Review.. 1000.00 119407 [3 Retail Liquor Store License (county) ..................... 312.50 210 U Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership ....,..,....... 900.00 0,950 U Liquor Licensed Drugstore (city) ........................... 227.50 ~ +3%55*-SECTION:B#*13*5WYÂ»Riv:3:295*BEERUCENSEFEES; ~9~~2 Â£ Liqpor Licensed Drugstore (county) ..................... 312.50 3131 1 Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (city) ...................... $96.25 2,Mt El Beer & Wine License (city) 351.25 2121 C] Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (county)................. 117.50 415% El Beer & Wine License (county) ............................ 436.25 96.25 2 978i ~H & R License 1*gty C] county ............................. 500.00 2122 2 Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (city)........................ Â«irKÂ·.6 2122 2 Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (county) ................. 117.50 4118.0-, C H&R License 6/opt Prem m city I] county .......... 500.00 --'094 41990' 0 Club License []City [] county ............................... 308.75 21%3 U Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (city) .................. 96.25 .,0,.,6.i 023 E Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (county) ........... 117.50 29194 [J Tavern License Â£ city m county ............................ 500.00 ....... 2020; C]Arts Licensemcityncounty.................................308.75 EffÂ¢9242?42*;SECTION CÂ¥44595RELATED* FEâ‚¬S AND PERMITS 4 i=-0 -20311 m Racetrack License El city m county....................... 500.00 1985-100 (999) u Addition of related Facility Permits to existing 420* E Optional Premises License o city D county ......... 500.00 Resort Complex license ' 7/#*I $50.00 x Â£1905; URetail Gaming Tavern Llc U city El county............ 500.00 Total Fee ;â€¢.'2LiÂ«:..R 2210-100 (999) m Retail Warehouse Storage Permit .....$100.00 0.9751 m Brew-Pub License 750.00 2220-100 (999) U Addition of Optional Premises to existing hotel/restaurant 519953 U Resort Complex License 500.00 'tok 41 $75.00 x Total Fee 44Â»viI D H/R - Tavern Managers Registration................. $75.00 *332 DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE -FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY ' ' LIABILITY INFORMATION:-. '6..r .--, ..2- Â£ i.Â»: 27 .1 " av r License Issued Through .. County.,Â· s.1 4 - City irtdu,try Type.. r 7 Ucense Accoilnt Numbern . â€¢ L ~ b' - + 54 r. (Expiration Date) â„¢. Liability Date i - 41 --7 Â·Â·Â· 1 .- ,-.j Â·: ' ' 0 5 1,â€ž, FROM , Â· '-Â·CÂ·.r..c.7 : .21 + TO.,Â·t- . - State . . City . - County Managers Reg , ~ -750 (999) - 2180-100 (999) 2190-100 (999) -7501999) ./ 4 . ''. I Cash Fund New LIcense Cash Fund Transfer Llcense TOTAL 2300-100 2310-100 (999) (999) DR 8404 (06/02) Page 3 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stock- Yes holders or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? m 1 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation) or manager ever (in Colorado or any other state); (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8a. Has a liquor license application (same license class), that was located within 500 feet of the proposed premises, been denied within the lkI., preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. m 8b. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been denied within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. m OL 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or private school that meets compulsory education requirements of Colorado law, or the principal campus of any college, university or seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any ~ ~-- current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 2 of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that h , this license will beksued by virtue of ownership, lease or other arrangement? Rm U Ownership [*LLease El Other (Explain in DetAil) a. If leased, list name of landlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: L*WOW<he IN & AjodA %~,4* " b fw TerÂ¥nt Expires Attach a diagram and outline the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, brewery, walls, partitions, entthnck exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11". (Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who, besides the owners listed in this application (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies), will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME DATE OF BIRTH FEIN OR SSN INIEREST A*Â·rb + re,w.Q>,tevL by 95'41 Go, 40Â·Â£?(63 KME â‚¬BLtf4 63, 'Mice *@WI 91* 06 Â· (5-.S- 4. Â¢f' 41*1 h|44, *Â£1.e~ioble, Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement, or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc.) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises Yes No A local ordinance or resolution authorizing optional premises has been adopted. m[~ Number of separate Optional Premises areas regi 'Asterl. 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No ' d\R (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. Â· Â· U (3 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and 00 not for pecuniary gain? (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is 00 operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization 6r society, but not for pecuniary gain? ~~* (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) . to be licensed as a club? (Three years required) 16. Brew-Pub License Applicants answer the following: 0~ (a) Has the applicant received or applied for a Federal Brewers Notice? c] m (Copy of notice or application must be attac),ed) 17a. Name of Manager (jetk Fiwvg*'DAL C 6\N ACAP31 (If this is an application for a Hotel, ' ~ Date of Birth Restaurant or Tavern License, the manager must al~submit an Jf;dividual History Record (DR 0*{16 17b. Does this manager act as the manager of, or have a financial interest in, any other liquor Yds licensed establishment in the State of Colorado? If yes, provide name, type of license and account number. m 18. Tax Distraint Information. Does the applicant or any other person listed on this application and including its partners, officers, Yes No directors, stockholders, members (LLC) or managing members (LLC) and any other persons with a 10% or greater financial interest in the applicant currently have an outstanding tax distraint issued to them by the Colorado Department of Revenue? If yes, provide an explanation and include copies of any payment agreements. 1 DR 8404-1 (06/02) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1881 PIERCE STREET RM 108A DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, Officers or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant or a Tavern License. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authority investigation. All questions must be answered in their entirety or your application may be delayed or not processed. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood or omission will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business :iu-'.f}*4mE y).UkedRY# 2.1]3;KiQ;~it, firs~ ~~~pa 109'~Â¥AV~ 3. L~~~~her ~r#mes ~ou have used. \ 4 .4.49081$ 4. 54iling address (if di~erent from resideng) U Home Telephond VO * 9-11 f*{* fÂ» 0~0 9%97 (9 10) 4*713:?G 5. List all residence addresses below. Include current and previous addresses for the past five years. STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO Current 6Alt MUR<kVU. frN-0 9, f#02 5 *1 04 02, 0541 Previous / c606 14. N o \\00MF ft (Alline 20 46*) opfol 010> bÂ» 94Â« B %67 44 , M 6. Date of Birth Social Security Number (SSN) Place of Birth) 7 U. S. Citizen? 5 45 I 16 42 1 43 -156 9 60&(4 ~ Yes UNo If Naturalizee, state where Wken Aame of District Court Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certification If an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number 8 Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do you have a current Driver's License? If so, give number & state 22 0 4Â© 6 R k'u M W kYes m No 60 9445-(46:45 10. List the name(s) of relatives working in or holding a financial interest in the Colorado alcohol beverage industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER ve you ever applied for, held, or had an interest in a State of Colorado Liquor -lka.-r License, or loaned money, furniture or fixtures, equipment or entory, to any liquor or beer licensee? If yes, answer in detail. El Yes 14. 12. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferrd*sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court or do you have any charges pending? (If yes, explain in detail.) 2 Yes po 13. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation, flpr a liquor law violation, or have you applied for or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. U Yes 0 No 14. List all current and former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years (Attach separate sheet if necessary) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO Ma<,6 1* WÂ¥ taRE MaftÂ¢Â®8*.fbt.44Â¥,61*if 01<9 0107- "109- 46*< 0516\ MID 7- (40\AeR 7*10 174*At -~01~12~Y~~~ ~~~1~~41414& 3t~7 MAW -9 - '10' '61) /01 - 15. Financial Information. Total purchase price $ Cif buying an existing business) OR list the total amount of your investment in the new busines6 including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital $ Provide details of Investment. Ydu must account for the sources of ALL cash (how acquired). Attach a separate sheet if needed. Type: Cash, Services or Equipment Where Obtained (~avings, Checking, Account, etc.) Amount 10/adl- Ok 4 \1\4\ 441*j C '0â‚¬A toi ODD 6Â«mik ~.4&(0*At ftwt 60**4\Ni- ~Lop~ f#~641 Â«coo . - Loan Information (attach copies of all notes or loans) Name of Lender Address Term Security Amount : D,Nu 4Â»(6Â® 24* 4 wiA 16;*461*1 64 ~*24â‚¬7 ji,601 0* 04 *1,0/44 csâ‚¬ DD,4, 4 *4 (66' ~5Â» *40,8% 2 104611 16. Give name of bank where business acrunt will be maintained; name the account will be maintained under; and the name or names of persons Althorized to draw thereon , *~D + 0*45 84 144201 1 1*111 11400*AiQ\)LANQVE ~ArÂ¢W Oath of Applicant I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best m,1 knowledge. Au <~ r~*r-~~ Title Date DEÂ¥*x - {l. li' 02~ / l ********88* **** ** * 8** * t.r) ~1 0, CN (N r-1(N r- (v r- ED 10 01 00 911 H w w 00 01 0 0 U........... 0 0 00 0 m 01 (v ~-1 =11 H w o m 0 00 m b w e m ,-1 i o o d M r-1 1 1 /0 tO 1 1 M r-1 r-lili CD I CD *********** ** 88* 8 8 *** 8 0 0 03 03 01 N 00 m 00 0 00 O 1-0 Ln 00 0 00 01 m Lr) 1-0 ~-1 01 r-1 r-1 0 r-1 V 00 V 914 r-1 0 m cv immr-O 1.n O ~-1 ,-1 cD Mil 91' 1 (N M rtrt .-1 I t LO : 41 (4 00 1-1 1 1-1 lilli lili 1 ******Â®*Â®*8 *29 ******** S r-1 tO t- 01 01 91' LD LD O 03 00 - r-1 0 00 00 In 911 911 1-0 w ,-1 (N .......... r-141 h In r-1 m r-1 0 01 LO LO 0 - M Co 00 mooomel r M I r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 d ,-1 X (Nr-1 111 1 1 11 411 *********** **Â®******** m LA # 1 00 01 0 w 1-1 C- r-1 01 .......... E-1 m In w 01 w 00 t- N 0 0 10 (N A 41 m t.n .1 0 01 0, m gil M m I Mr-1 1 1 1-1 1 .-1 @EJSTTT~Â°Â°Â°01*01(vm I 1t 61 1 1 161 m :1 Â§ 1 1 .1 W 0 232 0 2 H H 22*88*8**88* *** 20**88*** ,_, (N r- O 0, h (N m 00 Lf-) w o 911 01 0 00 01 01 t- 00 m Y or -1 . . . . . . . . . . . 01- ~ 0 0 0, LO W 01 ,-1 01 01 CO 00 U O 01 CD 01 â€¢-1 r-1 1-1 0 r-1 01 6 r-1 r-1 1 1 r-1 r-1 1 r-1 8.-1.-1 lilli 111 Â¤) O E. 1 1 1 1 E. 1 1 / R~c)Pc)Pc)PchedededPc)Pchechedede 00#dOdPdP*dedededededpap 1,1 0 (10 01 r- w Ul Ul 911 00 w Ln LO , m 01 w 0 m O 00 0, Ch LD 03 00 N~NJr<c< LO C,LO rr; Ul t-- 4 G , #Mnivi444[2 ~'*''' 01(NO(N=11(N ~4797 1 .41 1 ~-1 01 m r--1 1 11 lilli ~~77777~77,-11-11-11-11-1 84 8-4 0 ******** 88 ******** w m 91 co ~r, e A G C- 03 A W 00 41 r-11.0 00 0 .-1 ~RAJAJGRE,-1* ~664 6(444 4 <44 1 1 /0 1 1=1 1 1 11 ZZZ m E. 0 *****88* *eÂ» b ***eÂ»**41,8 Mt-00(NOODO#mt' r.-11 0 .. e m w Â·41 co 00 w m M .11 el 41 01 00â„¢412:moi UMJ~rr~~N'44(~443 um '11 1(Nâ€¢-1,-1 1Â£11 001111 izzZ 2 dede de de de de de de de de de 2 de de de de de OP de de de de c)) E., m m G w in 00 0 41 Lo -1 1 E-1 4 23 E- 1-0 00 m O un co ,-1 00 m ........... 41 t- 0 41 LO W r-1 r-1 LD 0 #M M .11 tn m m 41 L.n m 01 rn 01 01 1 11 11 m 42**********8 ***********8 00 41 ~-1 (N 0, t- 0 m ON W 0 41 0 00 # 01 m DO 10 In (N in .-1 t- 911 0, El A O 01 ~-1 01 01 Lf-) H ~ r-1 w 41 Z 1,4 A 911 0 01 Lr) r-1 In LO LO LO LO LO r-1 r-1 r-1 1 0 1 1 (N Z mIl lillil Ill I H H ~~~INZAIDAE->U Z m M :14 >1 Z .4 0 0, E-1 > U 01<DO<DiUOE,1 04 Di AA,<bOOMOO Di b k 0/2 4 21 t h < 01 0 0 A V~IIPTS US 34 TOTAL ST ACCOM ST COUNTS SALES TAX ECONOMIC INDICATORS % 3140-01-hi