The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 2001-09-251 Prepared 9/21/01 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high- value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT TOWN BOARD COMMENTS 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated September 18, 2001. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light & Power, September 13, 2001: 1. Christmas Decoration Installation Contract - *See memo amending/clarifying previous contract amount from $47,177 to $48,177. 2. Fall River Hydro Plant Site Development Contract, $54,400. B. Public Works Committee, September 20, 2001: 1. Financial Plan-Study & Water Rate Adjustment. 2. Public Works Equipment Replacement Purchases (5), $166,307.28. 3. Water Dept. 2000 Loop Project Change Order, $9,069.20. 4. Water Dept. 2001 Loop Project Bid Approval, $374,517. 5. Water Dept. SCADA Equipment, $13,400. 6. Glacier Creek Water Plant Scope of Services, $34,400. 7. CDOT 100% Reimbursed Project - Fish Creek/Highway 36 Intersection Scope of Services, $83,766. 4. Good Samaritan First Addition, And Good Samaritan Second Addition Annexation, Good Samaritan Society/Applicant - CONTINUE TO OCTOBER 23,2001. 5. Resolution #40-01 - Correcting Show Cause Liquor Hearing date for Deer Ridge, Inc. from 9/18/01 to 10/09/01. 1 Continued on reverse side 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. FRONT-RANGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE - PRESENTATION. Dr. Jim ButzeldVice President of the Larimer Campus, John Feeley/Director of College Communications, Susan Panico/Interim Director of Business Services, and Jim Carpenter/Interim Director of Estes Park Services. 2. CARLSON ADDITION ANNEXATION, Frederic & Susan Carlson, Trustee of Carlson Family TrusUApplicants: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Public Testimony D. Town Attorney White read Resolution #39-01 and Ordinance #14-01 E. Mayor - Close Public Hearing F. Motion to Approve/Deny. 3. RIVERSTONE CONDOMINIUMS 11, PRELIMINARY CONDOMINIUM MAP, LOT 2A, BLOCK 3, FALL RIVER ESTATES, Doug & Linda Cook/Applicants: A. Mayor - Open Public Hearing B. Staff Report C. Public Testimony D. Mayor - Close Public Hearing E. Motion to Approve/Deny. 4. 2000 CENSUS REPORT - PRESENTATION. Community Development Director Joseph. 5. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, September 18, 2001 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 18th day of September, 2001. Meeting called to order by Mayor John Baudek. Present: John Baudek, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker Stephen W. Gillette David Habecker Lori Jeffrey-Clark G. Wayne Newsom Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: None Mayor Baudek called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and read Resolution 38-01 condemning the brutal terrorist attacks on the United States that occurred September 11, 2001. The Mayor and Board of Trustees support the President of the United States to defend against additional attacks and recommend that its citizens support relief efforts in any way appropriate. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) Resolution 38-01 be approved as presented, and it passed unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENT None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS Trustee Habecker noted that the Good Samaritan Project received a tie vote at the Planning Commission meeting held earlier in the day and, in response to a recent letter printed in the Trail Gazette regarding local government, he explained that citizens are invited and encouraged to attend meetings and interact with local government during these forums. Trustee Habecker also commented on the situation in New York. Mayor Baudek invited citizens to attend an Estes Valley Transportation Alternatives Study Open House scheduled September 25, 2001 from 4:00-7:00 p.m. in Room 201- 203 of the Municipal Building to review peak season transportation data. 1. CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): 1. Town Board Minutes dated August 28, 2001. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety Committee, September 6, 2001: 1. Resolution #35-01 - Telephone Exchange/Wireless Communications Access Charges, effective January 1, 2002. Board of Trustees - September 18, 2001 - Page 2 4. Estes Park Housing Authority, July 11, 2001 (acknowledgement only). 5. Estes Valley Board of Adjustment, September 11, 2001 (acknowledgement only). 6. Estes Valley Planning Commission, August 21, 2001 (acknowledgement only). 7. Liquor Licensing: Official receipt of Complaint issued by the Police Department to Deer Ridge, Inc., dba National Park Village South (COUNTRY SUPERMARKET), 900 Moraine Ave. Resolution #37-01 - Schedule "Show Cause" Hearing for October 9, 2001. 8. Resolution #36-01 - Cafeteria Plan Certificate of Adoption (Formalization of previously approved Plan). It was moved and seconded (Newsom/Gillette) the Consent Agenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. lA. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSENT AGENDA (Approval of): Mayor Baudek noted that a public hearing would be conducted on the following items if the Town Board, Applicants, Staff or Public wished to speak. 1. SUBDIVISION & ACCESS EASEMENT VACATION. Amended Plat of Lot 3, Rock Acres Subdivision, John Ownby, Jr. & Deborah Ownby McCarty/Applicants (Continued from August 14, 2001) - WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT. 2. SUBDIVISION. Final Plat, Habitat Subdivision for a Portion of Lot 33, Bonnie Brae Subdivision, Habitat for Humanity of Estes Valley, Inc./Applicant. As there were no persons wishing to speak on the above items, it was moved and seconded (Habecker/Gillette) the Planning Commission Consent Agenda be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT - PARK RIVER WEST, TRACT 5, BEAVER POINT, FIRST ADDITION, RICHARD H. WILLE TRUST/APPLICANT - APPROVAL. Mayor Baudek opened the public hearing, and Trustee Habecker cited a conflict of interest and withdrew from discussions. Community Development Director Joseph presented the staff report: This is a request to subdivide and rezone property located adjacent to and west of RiverRock Townhomes. The purpose of the subdivision is to create building lots and dedicate road right-offway and various easements for future street connections. The rezoning from "A" Accommodation to "RM" Multi-family would provide a zoning classification consistent with the intended land use and would prevent future commercial use from occurring. The density allowances for this proposal are the same for the "A" and the "RM" district. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn, reported that 2 traffic studies have been completed and improvements to Moraine Ave. are included on CDOT's highway priority list. Board discussion included benefits of "RM" Multi-family zoning, aesthetics of proposed buildings, highway set-backs, and CDOT highway requirements. Board of Trustees - September 18, 2001 - Page 3 Town Attorney White explained that the plat does dedicate extra right-of-way along Moraine Ave. Audience comments were heard from Meredith Sloan, who stated a preference for more duplex units rather than multiplex units and requested that special consideration be given to the trees along the river corridor. Community Development Director Joseph noted that the applicant will provide to staff a professional report by a qualified Arborist addressing relocation of trees from the river corridor to other areas of the development. Staff will not support moving trees unless it is certain that they will not be harmed in any way. Concluding public testimony, Mayor Baudek closed the public hearing, and it was moved and seconded (Newsom/Jeffrey) that the preliminary plat, final plat and rezoning request from "A" Accommodations to "RM" Multi-family for Park River West, Tract 5, Beaver Point, First Addition be approved, and it passed with Trustee Habecker Abstaining. 2. KNOLL CONSERVANCY GROUP - STAFF RESPONSE/ RECOMMENDATION. Town Administrator Widmer reported that the Knoll- Willows Conservancy Committee presented a recommendation document containing a proposed plan for the Knoll-Willows properties to the Town Board on July 24, 2001. The Board was urged to: 1) combine the 19.4 acres into a single Conservation Area for research, education, and passive enjoyment; 2) legally protect, in perpetuity, these properties in their natural state and as an important historical site; and 3) identify this Conservation Area as a memorial to Enos A. Mills. Town Attorney White found no legal authority in Colorado for creating the requested Conservation Area, however, there is legal authority in Colorado for creating a conservation easement. A conservation easement has been used in Estes Park to preserve certain lands in open conditions, subject to the terms and conditions of the specific language of the conservation easement. Colorado Statutes require conservation easements to be granted in perpetuity. Town Administrator Widmer presented the following for Board consideration: 1. Establish a new zoning district or districts for the subject properties. The district(s) could distinguish between the special riparian nature of the Willows and the more open, grassland nature of the Knoll and allow different uses in each, if appropriate. Other publicly owned parcels could be included as desired. 2. Begin a master planning process for the properties that recognizes their special nature and includes a wide spectrum of public involvement. Trustee Gillette noted that the Town will not own the property until 2003 and he questioned the possibility of zoning changes prior to that time. Town Attorney White agreed that any changes to the purchase contract would be extremely difficult and probably impossible until the Town owns the land. Trustee Doylen questioned whether or not adoption of a Resolution detailing property use restrictions would be acceptable. Town Attorney White confirmed that the Board could adopt a Resolution outlining restrictions; however, this Board cannot legally bind future Boards. Board of Trustees - September 18, 2001 - Page 4 Trustee Habecker questioned the legal redtrictions placed on the sale of the property and use of Open Space funds. Audience comments were heard from members of the Conservancy including: Bud Hampton, Bob Jones, Mary Bauer, Glen Mapes, and Dorothy Gibbs. Opinions included the importance of the establishment of a Conservation Area, community involvement in a solution, a commitment by the Board to preserve the natural space, and the possibility of granting a conservation easement to the Estes Valley Land Trust. Additional audience comments were heard from Inez Wheeler and George Hockman, speaking in opposition to commercial development. On behalf of the Board, Mayor Baudek stated there was no intent to sell or develop the property; Trustee Jeffrey-Clark noted she is a member of Open Lands Board of Larimer County and explained that funds for maintenance will be available through 2018. Concluding all discussion, the consensus of the Board was to research the establishment of a new zoning district or districts and begin a master planning process for the properties that recognizes their special nature. Mayor Baudek declared a 5-minute recess at 8:32 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:37 p.m. 3. BOARD ROOM REMODELING PROJECT - PRESENTATION. Town Administrator Widmer reported that funds are included in the 2001/2002 Budget for the design and construction of a new Town Board/Community Meeting Room in the old Fire Station space of the Municipal Building. In May 2001, the Town hired the design/build team of Thorp Associates, P.C. and R.C. Heath Construction Co. The presentation by Randy DeMario/R.C. Heath Construction Co. and Joe Kelvin/Thorp Associates, P.C. covered building cost estimates, floor plans, and interior and exterior characteristics. Municipal Court Judge Brown expressed concerns regarding the proposed court chamber area and document table. Mayor Baudek noted that no action was necessary at this time. This item will be placed on the October 9, 2001 Town Board agenda for authorization to proceed. 4. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) BETWEEN THE ESTES VALLEY RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT AND THE TOWN FOR THE EVENTS CENTER/ICE RINK - APPROVAL. Town Administrator Widmer presented the IGA, and it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Newsom) the Intergovernmental Agreement be approved as presented, and it passed unanimously. 5. 2000 CENSUS REPORT - PRESENTATION. Continued to September 25, 2001. 6. REVISION TO THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA ACCESS POLICY TO INCLUDE TOWN WEBSITE "LINKING" POLICY - APPROVAL. Town Administrator Widmer reported that governmental entities have been faced with legal action due to inconsistent application and/or inappropriato application of links from their web sites to commercial or private web sites. Whenever a user selects a link to a site not controlled by the Town he/she should be aware that the Town does not endorse any product or entity for which a link may be provided, and that thdTown is not responsible for the content or availability of Board of Trustees - September 18, 2001 - Page 5 these outside recourses. Town Administrator Widmer noted that this disclaimer should be placed on our web pages. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Barker) the revision to the Electronic Media Access policy be approved, and it passed unanimously. 7. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A. Sales Tax Revenues. July Sales Tax revenues indicate a 5.1% increase from 2000. The year-to-date data from December through July, based on the budget, is 6.2% ahead of 2000. From statistics collected, it appears that groceries, accommodations and restaurants are up, and retail is down. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Baudek adjourned the meeting at 9:25 p.m. John Baudek, Mayor Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk , TOWN OF ESTES PARK Office Memorandum To: The Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Richard E. Matzkâ‚¬-leta- Date: September 20, 2001 Re: 2001 to 2002 Christmas Decoration Contract Revised Amount BACKGROUND: For the last two (2) years we have operated and maintained the twinkle lights in the street trees in the downtown area through Presidents Weekend in mid-February. This yeafs successful bidder, TA Enterprises, quoted a price of $1,000 to maintain the lights from January 1, 2002 to Presidents Weekend 2002. BUDGET/COST: The 2001 budget includes $55,000 for the Christmas Decoration Installation Contract The contract amount of $47,177 was recommended by the Light and Power Committee on September 13, 2001, but the $1,000 for extended light maintenance was unintentionally omitted. RECOMMENDATION: The Light and Power Department recommends that the contract amount awarded to TA Enterprises be revised to $48,177 to include maintenance of the lights through Presidents Weekend 2002. REM/lb BRADroROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, September 13, 2001 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 13th day of September, 2001. Committee: Chairman Jeffrey-Clark, Trustees Habecker and Newsom Attending: All Absent None Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Light & Power Director Matzke, Assistant to the Light & Power Director Mangelsen, Deputy Town Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Jeffrey-Clark called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. and noted the importance of continuing the business of government during these difficult times. 2001-2002 CHRISTMAS DECORATION INSTALLATION CONTRACT - BIDDING UPDATE. Assistant Director Mangelsen reported that Christmas decoration installation was privitized in 1996. Rocky Mountain Lawn Care was contracted in 1996,1997,1998 and TA Enterprises 1999 and 2000. The 2001 budget includes $55,000 for this installation contract and the following bids for the 2001-2002 contract were received: 2001 2002 Bill's Tree Surgery 21,105 21,105 TA Enterprises 47,177 49,530 Anthony Raemakers 50,000 52,500 Rocky Mountain Lawn Care 55,700 59,485 Staff expressed concerns that the low bid is not sufficient to complete the scope of the work included in the contract. Bill Smith/Bill's Tree Surgery addressed staff and Committee concerns regarding his experience, references, equipment, employees, and insurance. Tom Childers/TA Enterprises discussed his equipment, experience, and projected man hours for the project. Concluding all discussion, the Committee recommends that the 2001 to 2002 Christmas Decoration contract be awarded to TA Enterprises at a cost of $47,177 in 2001 and $49,530 in 2002. FALL RIVER HYDRO PLANT SITE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT - APROVAL. Director Matzke reported that bids were requested to perform the site development of the final phase of the historic renovation of the Fall River Hydro Plant. The 2001 budget is $140,000 and there is a $15,000 balance in this line item; staff does not anticipate using any State Historical Grant funding for this portion of the project. The following bids were received: R.C. Heath $101,785 TA Enterprises 54,400 Rocky Mountain Lawn Care 13,111 (Landscape only) The bids from R.C. Heath and TA Enterprises are for the entire project. The bid from Rocky Mountain Lawn Care is for landscaping only and would require the Town to act i DRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee - September 13, 2001 - Page 2 as the general contractor to complete the remaining portions of the site development. The Committee recommends that the contract for site development be awarded to TA Enterprises at a cost of $54,400 and the 2001 budget be supplemented by $45,000 to fund this contract. REPORTS Platte River Power Authority (PRPA): The following items were discussed during the August work session: 1) addition of a 2nd unit at Rawhide; 2) a combined cycle unit; 3) a simple cycle unit; and 4) a joint project in the southeastern part of State. Financial Report: The July and August graphs were revieWed. Staff was directed to provide income statement detail at the October meeting. Project Updates: Director Matzke reported that the RMNP system upgrade is complete, the 2002 Budget revisions have been submitted, and American flags have been placed throughout Town as a sign of patriotism and in memory of those killed during the attack on the United States. Charter Communications Franchise Transfer of Ownership - Update: Director Matzke presented a letter from Town Attorney White to Charter Communications, Inc. regarding the franchise transfer of ownership. All requirements outlined by staff and Attorney White have been adequately addressed. No further action by the Town is required to complete the transfer of ownership. There being no further business, Chairman Jeffrey-Clark adjourned the meeting at 9:00 a.nn. Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk eRADFOROPUILISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, September 20, 2001 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 20th day of September, 2001. Committee: Chairman Barker, Trustees Doylen and Gillette Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Public Works Director Linnane, Water Supt. Goehring, Fleet Manager Mahany, Const./Facilities Mgr. Sievers, Clerk O'Connor Absent None Chairman Barker called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. 1. WATER DEPT. FINANCIAL PLAN & RATE STUDY - REQUEST ACCEPTANCE OF STUDY AND WATER RATE ADJUSTMENTS IN 2004 AND 2005. Public Works Director Linnane introduced Consultant John Gallagher/Black' & Veatch. In his memo dated 9/17/01, Public Works Dir. Linnane reported that last August, Black & Veatch completed a five-year Financial Plan for the Water Dept. and recommended a 15%+ cumulative water rate increase by 2005. The increase would fund an aggressive Capital Improvement Program and also allow for a $1,000,000 cash balance for contingency/emergency projects. Pursuant to the study, a cumulative 15%+ is being proposed in the next 5 years. The previous rate increase occurred in 1998. A "Water Line Replacement Priority List" was reviewed: Priority Lists 1 and 2 are scheduled for completion by 2003, and Priority List 3 is scheduled for construction beginning in 2004. Accountable water has been greatly improved during the past five years due to the completion of items contained in the Priority List-from 72% to 86%, equivalent to approximately 350 CBT units that cost over $10,000 each. Mr. Gallagher responded to questions relative to the front-range: benchmarking of water rates, average usage/month, fund balance/operating reserves, and the regulatory environment. He stated that the proposed rate is slightly higher than the average front-range rate, which is understandable given the TowA' s complex water system. Discussion followed, with the Committee recommending: (1) approval of the Water Financial Plan and Cost of Services Rate Study, (2) a cumulative rate increase of 2.9% for five years, effective January, 2002 through January, 2006 for a total rate adjustment of 15.4%. Mr. Gallagher noted his appreciation for the on-going relationship with the Public Works Committee and staff. 2. MacGREGOR AVE. PEDESTRIAN ROADWAY SHOULDER - REQUEST APPROVAL OF "NO PARKING" SIGNS ADJACENT TO CANYON CREEK CONDOMINIUMS. MacGregor Ave., north of the Bypass, is heavily-used as a pedestrian route, and the Public Works Dept. recently graded and added road base to the eastern edge of the MacGregor right-of-way. To preserve the shoulder as a pedestrian trail, it is BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - September 20, 2001 - Page 2 necessary to ban parking. Residents in the adjacent Canyon Creek Condominium area will need to use the off-street parking (approximately 2 spaces per unit) designed into their project. Affected residents were notified and invited to attend this meeting, however, there were no residents in attendance. The Committee recommends "No Parking" signs be installed along the eastern edge of MacGregor Ave., adjacent to Canyon Creek Condominiums. 3. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. EQUIPMENT PURCHASES - REQUEST APPROVAL TO PURCHASE BUDGETED ITEMS. Fleet Manager Mahany stated that the fo116wing equipment was budgeted for replacement in 2001: (1) 3/4 Ton, 4x4 Pickup Truck with Snowplow (replacement). The low bidder is Estes Park Auto Mall, $22,471.00 for a Ford % Ton Pickup w/snowplow. The budget was $29,500, and staff is recommending approval of said bid for $22,471. (2) Loader (replacement). One bid was received and staff recommends approval of the Colorado Machinery Co. bid for a new John Deere Loader w/snowplow and mounting brackets for a snowblower for a total cost of $99,531. The budget amount was $93,000, and the over-budget amdunt could be funded from the balance remaining in Item #1 above. Additionally, staff is requesting approval to participate in a two-year Rollover Program (cost is $2,000 every two years, plus any price increase). The Town would receive a new loader every two years. (3) Three-Wheel Truckster and Top-Dresser (replacement). One bid was received for Item #3 (only one dealer) and staff recommends approval of the L.L. Johnson Distributing Co. bid of $18,528 for a new Cushman Truckster and Top-dresser. The budget amount was $22,000. (4) Walker Mower (replacement). One bid was received and staff recommends approval of the Mac Equipment Co. bid of $7,939.28 for a new Walker Mower. The budget amount was $13,000. (5) Tractor with Snowplow, Snowblower, Sidewalk Broom, and Front Mower Deck (replacement). Staff requested one bid as there is only one Bobcat dealer able to sell in this area. Staff is recommending approval of the Colorado Machinery Co. bid of $17,838 for a new Bobcat Skid Steer Loader w/attachments. The budgeted amount was $14,000, and the over- budget amount could be funded from the balance remaining in Item #4 above. Additionally, staff is requesting approval to participate in the Annual Bobcat Rollover Program, where the Town would receive a new Bobcat annually at no cost. All items are within the Town's Replacement Policy and the total expenditure is $166,307.28; the total budgeted amount is $171,500. The Committee recommends approval of the budgeted equipment (5) as listed above for a total expenditure of $166,307.28, plus the Annual Rollover Programs for the Loader and Tractor. 4. WATER DEPT. 2000 LOOP PROJECT CHANGE ORDER - REQUEST APPROVAL OF FINAL ASPHALT QUANTITY AND PAYMENT. Final asphalt patching on this project was performed in June and the Contractor BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - September 20, 2001 - Page 3 has submitted a final payment request of $9,069.20. This amount could be funded from the 2001 Loop Project. The Committee recommends approval of the final change order submitted by Kitchen & Co. in the amount of $9,069.20. 5. WATER DEPT. 2001 LOOP PROJECT - REQUEST APPROVAL OF BIDS. This project includes 4 items, and the following low bids were reviewed: PROJECT CONTRACTOR LOW BID Devil's Gulch 12" Dirt Doctors LLC $99,168 Summerset 12" " 103,837 Marys Lake Rd. 4" ' 13,550 Abandonment Stanley Cir. 6" & 8- Kitchen & Co. 157,962 - With the exception of the Marys Lake project, all of the projects are listed on the Water Line Replacement 'High Priority" List. The projects will begin approximately the first week of October, and they should be completed within 90 days (the asphalt work would be completed in the Spring of 2002). The total cost is $374,517 and the budgeted amount is $510,000. The Committee recommends approval of the four bids identified above, for a total budget expenditure'of $374,517. 6. WATER DEPT. SCADA EQUIPMENT - REQUEST APPROVAL TO PURCHASE BUDGETED EQUIPMENT. Staff is seeking approval to add a wireless bridge connection to network the three central computers of Glacier Creek and Marys Lake Plants and the Water Shop. This connection would improve efficiency and reduce travel. Integrated Telecommunications System, Inc. submitted a price of $11,294.80, and with in- house installation, the total cost is $12,794.80. The Committee recommends approval of the budgeted expenditure of $12,794.80. 7. GLACIER CREEK WATER PLANT FILTERS PROJECT DESIGN/CONST. MANAGEMENT - REQUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES. Pursuant to recent EPA requirements, modification of the filter basins is required at the Glacier Creek Water Treatment Plant. The budget includes design funding in 2001 and construction in 2002. Cornerstone Engineering submitted a scope of services of $34,400; the budgeted amount is $35,000. The Committee recommends approval of the Scope of Services in the amount of $34,400 as submitted by Cornerstone Engineering. 8. FISH CREEK-HIGHWAY 36 INTERSECTION DESIGN/CONST. MANAGEMENT - REQUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICE FOR CDOT REIMBURSED PROJECT. CDOT has included the reconstruction of this intersection as part of the Causeway Underpass Construction Project and they have agreed to fund all of the design, construction management and construction at 100%. Cornerstone Engineering submitted a scope of services of $83,766 as an amendment to their Causeway Underpass Scope of Services Contract. If approved, the 2001 Budget must be supplemented for the additional expense and the associated grant revenue. The Committee recommends approval of the Scope of Services in the amount of BRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - September 20, 2001 - Page 4 $83,766 submitted by Cornerstone Engineering, said funds to be reimbursed 100% by CDOT. REPORTS. The Public Works and Police Department co-spohsored a community meeting of Larkspur Ave. Residents to discuss this No. 1 speeding section of roadway, and the need to install a traffic calmer ($5,000 is budgeted for this project). Results of the meeting were that the Town would install a traffic calmer at one location, and, on a trial basis to determine their effectiveness, install "cut-in strips" (1"). These strips are inexpensive and should they prove unsuccessful, the asphalt can be repaired at minimal cost. Staff believes these efforts will meet resident and staff concerns. Chairman Barker requested staff review future major engineering work [for non-water line related projects] to ensure an equitable bidding process for all qualified engineering firms. Note: the bracketed portion was clarified with the Chairman following the meeting. There being no further business, Chairman Barker adjourned the meeting at 8:54 a.m. C '4 j let. -- j 0 -(11Â»ajj Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk, 1[R\IE(@IMEI1VIE~I CORNEASTONE 111-)) [------ - 437 South St. Vrain *i SEP 2 0 Not *1: Estes Park, CO 80517 {970) 586-2458 2%6. , 1 lil Fax (970) 586-2459 ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. 1 6. 6' E-mail: ces@frii.com 1.Â¢ 6 September 20, 2001 Mr. Bob Joseph Vickie O'Connor Community Development Director Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Removal of Good Samaritan Society from Agenda at Town Board Meeting Dear Bob and Vickie: Cornerstone Engineering & Surveying, Inc. (CES) is requesting the Good Samaritan Soc*ty Subdivision annexation and rezoning applications be removed from the agenda of the Town Board of Directors meeting scheduled for September 25,2001. CES will keep you informed o f progress regarding the applications for annexation and rezoning for the Good Samaritan Subdivision. Please call me i f you have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, A // Come;#tolly~EQ~j~ering & Surveying, Inc. ~14 Lth ferry Prochaska Principal ec: Greg Amble, Good Samaritan Society Marlyn Tande, Good Samaritan Society RESOLUTION NO. 40-01 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on September 11, 2001, and continued to September 18, 2001 charging DEER RIDGE, INC., dba NATIONAL PARK VILLAGE SOUTH (COUNTRY SUPER MARKET), 3.2% RETAIL BEER LICENSE, OFF PREMISES, LICENSE NO. 03-02531-0003 with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES:OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place at the Town Board meeting scheduled TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room (Room 130) of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: DEER RIDGE, INC. dba NATIONAL PARK VILLAGE SOUTH (COUNTRY SUPER MARKET J. Scott Webermeier, Secretary Treasurer 900 Moraine Ave. Estes Park, Colorado 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS 2501 DAY OF September , 2001. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Bob Joseph, Community Development Director Date:9-21-01 Subject: Carlson Addition - - .-- .0 r I . '9%64#542/<2*2Mfi .9 - - .... 8 -r--'w(MdVâ€¢711<~21 'll 0 A I .1,& .... 0 Â·,>*#L E , l 34<UP-FÂ»:3*4 4 ) ~ 17.1.1,/7 PAR. .U ffÂ·Â·u, *72*W#*' \ \ ADD. 4 , .... . 1. . ...-I --/' -- . 4 I . 1 ..2 - E . 1 -, ..4 . . g 4 .. . 2%.. 15 ...1. D. - 9\...'T ]*. I' --fg 1:*9.-4 .1'.. 1\Zel,Â· 1 :44*4 Â·Â·2 1 12Â£1 \ 47-:9915 lits, I .j ly 1, . . A 1 .AE 1 .0 4 ...111 ... , . 1-e# 1, 1 ,/â€¢ .1 li (0*OUNTAIN , 1 .OL, 14 11}., 1.1.k , 1 1 COMWUN, 1 I .t.aM.... a -11-W-1" 1, 0 -Â·â€¢ALL.L.LI â€¢ : '1â€¢"'V' â€žrÂ·g 11.,1.."1 0 4 f - 1 H ,- .1 1 JaC-1/.1*Â·Â· -Prir 30.29 U --1 ~ GOL' COURSE 1 -----1--1 <317*Ezz9~r,52 .. O 1 - 1. 4 t 1 . . 1 . Background: This is a request to annex 8.99 acres located on the east side of Fish Creek Rd near Brodie Ave. Town water service will be extended from Brodie Ave. near the entrance to the Community Church. All other utility services are on or adjacent to the site. The property is presently zoned A-Accommodations, and is to remain zoned A-Accommodations upon annexation. A subdivision of this property is being proposed to allow commercial accommodations development to occur on several smaller lots with a new loop public street. Recommendation: Annexation with A-Accommodations zoning. RESOLUTION NO. 39-01 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-110, C.R.S., hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the following described area, that the requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12- 104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., have been met; that an election is not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the annexation. The area eligible for annexation known as "CARLSON ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park is as follows: That part of the SW 1/4 of Section 29, T5N, R72W of the 6th P.M., and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a stone monument used as the NE corner of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 29; thence South a distance of 383.50 feet; thence N88Â°23'19"W a distance of 530.98 feet; thence N52Â°39'32"W a distance of 66.57 feet; thence N71Â°51'17"W a distance of 80.99 feet; thence the following four courses and distances along the easterly line of Community Addition; thence N10Â°11'12"E a distance of 46.93 feet; thence 309.71 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve has a radius of 318.30 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears N17Â°41'18"W a distance of 297.64 feet; thence N45Â°33'48"W a distance of 165.80 feet; thence 151.17 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve has a radius of 136.40 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears N13Â°48'52"W a distance of 143.55 feet; thence S72Â°03'56"E a distance of 106.45 feet; thence S88Â°31'21"E a distance of 794.44 feet to the East line of said SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 29; thence South a distance of 229.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Except any portion contained in instrument recorded June 7, 1976 in Book 1711 at Page 324. Containing 8.99 Acres. DATED this 25* day of September , 2001. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 14-01 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS CARLSON ADDITION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a Petition for Annexation, together with four (4) copies of the plat of said area as required by law, was filed with the Board of Trustees on the 27~h day of Julv , 2001 by the landowners of one hundred percent (100%) of the area and owning one hundred percent (100%) of the area, excluding public streets and alleys of the area hereinafter described. The Board, by Resolution at its regular meeting on the 14~h day of August, 2001, accepted said Petition and found and determined that the provisions of Section 31-12-107(1), C.R.S., were met; and the Board further determined that the Town. Board should consider the annexation plat on Tuesday, July 24 2001 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Building for the purposes of determining that the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., and is considered eligible for annexation. Section 2. That the Notice of said hearing was given and published as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S. Section 3. That the hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-12- 109, C.R. S., on the 25~1 day of September, 2001. Section 4. That following said hearing, the Board of Trustees adopted a Resolution determining that the proposed annexation met the requirements of the applicable parts of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S.; that an election was not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms or conditions are to be imposed upon said annexation. Section 5. That the annexation of the following described area designated as CARLSON ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, is hereby approved: That part of the SW 1/4 of Section 29, T5N, R72W of the 6th P.M., and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a stone monument used as the NE corner of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 29; thence South a distance of 383.50 feet; thence N88Â°23'19"W a distance of 530.98 feet; thence N52Â°39'32"W a distance of 66.57 feet; thence N71Â°51'17"W a distance of 80.99 feet; thence the following four courses and distances along the easterly line of Community Addition; thence N10Â°11'12"E a distance of 46.93 feet; thence 309.71 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve has a radius of 318.30 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears N17Â°41'18"W a distance of 297.64 feet; thence N45Â°33'48"W a distance of 165.80 feet; thence 151.17 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve has a radius of 136.40 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears N13Â°48'52"W a distance of 143.55 feet; thence S72Â°03'56"E a distance of 106.45 feet; thence S88Â°31'21"E a distance of 794.44 feet to the East line of said SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 29; thence South a distance of 229.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Except any portion contained in instrument recorded June 7, 1976 in Book 1711 at Page 324. Containing 8.99 Acres. Section 6. The Town of Estes Park, Colorado, hereby consents, pursuant to Section 37-45-126(3.6) C.R.S., to the inclusion of lands described above into the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal SubDistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Section 7. Carlson Addition is zoned A-Accommodations. Section 8. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) -days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS 25th DAY OF September , 2001. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 25~h day of September, 2001 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 2001, all as required by the Statutes of the State of Colorado. Town Clerk MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor Baudek and Board of Trustees From: Dave Shirk, Planner II Date:9-21-01 Subject: Riverstone Condominiums II Preliminary Condominium Map PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request for a condominium map for the Riverstone development plan and subdivision, approved by the Estes Park Planning Commission in spring 1999. That development plan provided for four (4) residential and nine (9) accommodation units. Background: It is Staffs opinion this condominium map should not be used to extend the previously approved development plan, which was approved before the adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code. The applicant requested a one-year time extension with that revised development plan. Due to the implementation of the new development code, Staff recommended against granting the time extension, and maintains that position. The rationale for recommending against granting the time extension is,based on the state mandated vested rights period. The vested rights period guarantees development rights for a period of three years; this protects property owners from code changes. At the same time, the vested rights period lasts three years, which serves as a guarantee to neighbors that if the project is not built within three years, a new public hearing and compliance with new code provisions will be ensured. Therefore, Staff recommends that approval of this condominium map will not provide a time extension for the development plan. The following note should be placed on the condominium map: "Approval of this condominium map does not provide for any extension of vested rights for any development plan for the property depicted on this plat." Recommendation: Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Preliminary Riverstone Condominium II Map pending approval of a revised development plan CONDITIONAL TO: The following note should be placed on the condominium map: "Approval of this condominium map does not provide for any extension of vested rights for any development plan for the property depicted on this plat." Riverstone Condominiums II ~ Preliminary Condominium Map Estes Park Community Development Department I ...,10 Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue -'*.---i-- - PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Phone: 970-577-3721 Fax: 970-586-0249 www.estesnet.com DATE: September 25, 2001 REQUEST: This is a request to review to the proposed preliminary condominium map for a thirteen (13) unit accommodations and residential development. LOCATION: The site is located at Lot 2A of =- FUP A I \f~ the amended plat of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 3, -__~Â·Â·C.i*FcarÂ£~a==-59/ ~ USFS ~ Fall River Estates, within the Town of Estes >*RV---2.~lt 1 ...===r-Nt Park, commonly known as 2120 Fall River bi - L.9.4/ZA'O-Z-dZfL F Road. (,7..12*17/k'Mf \/ Fecky UP -r - ... 7, 1-1 Atu~ain f71 21,0 -91:31 ek LEFS NUicrld Fark APPLICANT/OWNER: Doug and Linda 0 6 Cook = USES +7 RMNP ' h STAFF CONTACT: Bob Joseph .C 1-by APPLICABLE LAND USE CODE: Estes Valley Development Code I. SITE DATA TABLE: Engineer: Estes Park Surveyors and Engineers (Paul Kochevar), 586-5175 Parcel Number(s): 3522226003 Total Development Area: 1.1-acre (+/-) Number of Lots: One Existing Land Use: Unimproved Proposed Land Use: Condominiums Existing Zoning: "A" Accommodations Adjacent Zoning- East: "A-1" Accommodations North: "A" Accommodations West: "E-1" Estate South: "A" Accommodations Adjacent Land Uses- East: Accommodations North: Accommodations West: Single family residential South: Accommodations Services- Water: Town Sewer: Upper Thompson Fire Protection: Estes Park II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND: This is a request for a condominium map for the Riverstone development plan and subdivision, approved by the Estes Park Planning Commission in spring 1999. That development plan provided for four (4) residential and nine (9) accommodation units. A condition of approval was that the accommodation units "shall not be individually transferred". A recent amendment to the development plan (approved by EVPC in August) removed this condition, and the applicant now proposes to condominiumize the nine (9) "accommodation" units as well as the four (4) "residential" units. Why is this going to Town Board? At their May 15, 2001 meeting, the Planning Commission continued this proposal for a preliminary condominium map pending the revision of the development plan. The Planning Commission has since approved the revised development plan. Pursuant to Section 3.1.D "Required Times for Action and Inaction": "Failure of the reviewers or Decision-Making Body to take action on a subdivision or PUD application within any time frame ~ required by this Chapter, or other time frame agreed to by the Applicant at the time of the application filing or during the application' s review, shall be deemed an approval of the application unless the Applicant agrees to an extension of the time period in writing. Based on this code section and the elapsed time period, the applicant has requested this proposal be submitted to the Town Board for final determination. Due to the lack of action of the Planning Commission, the planning commission recommendation forwarded to the Town Board is that of approval. Staff maintains a position of conditional approval. III. REVIEW CRITERIA: Pursuant to Section 10.5.H, no condominium development shall be approved unless the condominium plat is in conformance with the requirements of the zoning district within which it is located and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. The condominium map conforms to the amended subdivision plat approved in 1996. No additional lots or development density is proposed. Page #2 - Riverstone Condominiums II, Preliminary Condominium Map IV. REFFERAL COMMENTS AND OTHER ISSUES: This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. Upper Thompson Sanitation District. Upper Thompson Sanitation District noted that they will require the purchase of one or two additional plant investment fees and the relocation of a collection line. Town Attorney. Town Attorney White had comments regarding the use of "accommodation" units versus "multi-family units". In particular, Mr. White states "the condominium documents should provide that the accommodation units be maintained as accommodation units and not multi- family units." These units need to be delineated on the condominium map. The purpose of this is related to the limited kitchens in accommodation units versus full kitchens in multi-family units and the associated allowable density. Please refer to Greg Whites memo for full comments. Staff Comments. It is Staffs opinion this condominium map should not be used to extend the previously approved development plan, which was approved before the adoption of the Estes Valley Development Code. The applicant requested a one-year time extension with that revised development 1 plan. Due to the implementation of the new development code, Staff recommended against granting the time extension, and maintains that position. The rationale for recommending against granting the time extension is based on the state mandated vested rights period. The vested rights period guarantees development rights for a period of three years; this protects property owners from code changes. At the same time, the vested rights period lasts three years, which serves as a guarantee to neighbors that if the project is not built within three years, a new public hearing and compliance with new code provisions will be ensured. Therefore, Staff recommends that approval o f this condominium map will not provide a time extension for the development plan. The following note should be placed on the condominium map: "Approval of this condominium map does not provide for any extension of vested rights for any development plan for the property depicted on this plat." V. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, Staff finds: 1. This is a request by Doug and Linda Cook to review to the proposed condominium map. Page #3 - Riverstone Condominiums II, Preliminary Condominium Map 2. The site is located at Lot 2A of the amended plat of Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 3, Fall River Estates, within the Town of Estes Park, commonly known as 2120 Fall River Road. 3. This is a request for a condominium map for the Riverstone development plan and subdivision, which was approved by the Estes Park Planning Commission in spring 1999. That development plan provided for four (4) residential and nine (9) accommodation units. A condition of approval was that the accommodation units "shall not be individually transferred". 4. A recent amendment to the development plan (approved by EVPC in August) removed this condition, and the applicant now proposes to condominiumize the nine (9) "accommodation" units as well as the four (4) "residential" units. 5. The following note should be placed on the condominium map: "Approval of this condominium map does not provide for any extension of vested rights for any development plan for the property depicted on this plat." 6. Pursuant to Section 10.5.H, no condominium development shall be approved unless the condominium plat is in conformance with the , requirements of the zoning district within which it is located and all other applicable provisions of the Estes Valley Development Code. The proposal complies with the approved plat of subdivision and does not include additional lots or increased density. 7. This request has been submitted to all applicable reviewing agency staff for consideration and comment. No significant issues or concerns were expressed by reviewing staff relative to code compliance or the provision of public services. 8. Town Attorney White had comments regarding the use of "accommodation" units versus "multi-family units". Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL o f the proposed Preliminary Riverstone Condominium II Map pending approval of a revised development plan CONDITIONAL TO: The following note should be placed on the condominium map: "Approval of this condominium map does not provide for any extension of vested rights for any development plan for the property depicted on this plat." Page #4 - Riverstone Condominiums II, Preliminary Condominium Map 112~11~J]12-,-9â‚¬3332:Ejij-'3Jj-d m I - . 0 Sâ€¢,- Jb 0--0 2 0 0 - 1~MUDJ:UWL '-2 01,11111)LJOJJ.)-2,0.4#vI Annual Year Population Growth Rate Growth Rate 1950 1,617 1960 1,175 -27.3% -3.1% 1970 1,616 37.5% 3.2% 1980 2,703 67.3% 5.3% 1990 3,184 17.8% 1.7% 1990* 3,672 35.9% 3.1% 2000 5,413 70.0% 5.5% *Town of Estes Park estimates 1 . . J . to Year Households 4 1980 1,230 1990 1,444 1990* 1,692 2000 2,541 *Town of Es,es Park estimates '"f.,1 y ...4,1 F 1.- IM= 14 , 7 01 11 Percentage 1990 2000 Change Total Population 3,184 5,413 70.0% '~ Median age (years) 42.6 45.0 5.6% Â¢ Under 18 years 608 951 56.4% , Over 65 years 732 1,118 52.7% 2 m. B - '. 3,14 1 : . 23 ~ 2000 Chana Total households ~ 2,541 ~ Family households (families) ~E?1 1,566 65.0% 1MaMed-couple family ~ 1,328 58.3% i. 1Female householder ~ 168 97.6% 4 Nonfamily households 1Male householder 70 180.0% ~,1 975 97.0% ~ Householder Ii-ng alone ER:I 788 84.1% ~~Householder 65 vears and over I!31 247 34.2% Average household size ~ 2.11 -2.8% . .,30=11Â»â€¢jl : - / 11==,0 ~ 2099 22!152 4 White ~EM] 5,213 65.8% Hispanic 301 812.1% ,~ Black or African American 25 400.0% 59 555.6% American Indian and Alaska Native IIIIIJU Asian -=al 50 163.2% 4' ~ Some other race 134 1814.3% 3 -ill... - - 1/94/0/. M=- 1 65.7% 0 ':0' 0 . "194V.Q/Jn 80.0% Owner-occupied housing units Imili 85.8% 1;l~Jiltzi~*.DiDilleJ[40111*111411ll1ll11!tz~ 63.0% 39.1% ]11:I:DICIâ‚¬,41.1011:DI(Iâ€¢liblingâ€¢:â‚¬01: ic![â€¢li!:Il#97..Qam/"EMB 30.8% -0.3% , ~ Renter vacancy rate inEO.-1.471 A,eraae household size of owner-occuDied units ~ 4.9% A,eraae nousenola size or renier-occuolea unlIs ~i}Â¤~ + .n .El.xert 4 Town of Estes Park Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Census Subiect Number Percent Total Population 5,413 100.0% SEX AND AGE Male 2,597 48.0% Female 2,816 52.0% 244 4.5% Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 267 4.9% 10 to 14 years 263 4.9% 15 to 19 years 259 4.8% 20 to 24 years 230 4.2% 25 to 34 years 584 10.8% 35 to 44 years 856 15.8% 45 to 54 years 862 15.9% 55 to 59 years 386 7.1% 60 to 64 years 344 6.4% 65 to 74 years 630 11.6% 75 to 84 years 377 7.0% 85 years and over 111 2.1% Median age (years) 45.0 (X) 18 years and over 4,462 82.4% Male 2,122 39.2% Female 2,340 43.2% 21 years and over 4,343 80.2% 62 years and over 1,313 24.3% 65 years and over 1,118 20.7% Male 492 9.1% Female 626 11.6% RACE One race 5,350 98.8% White 5,150 95.1% Black or African American 17 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native 26 0.5% Asian 42 0.8% Asian Indian 3 0.1% Chinese 7 0.1% Filipino 5 0.1% Japanese 6 0.1% Korean 9 0.2% Vietnamese 0 0.0% Other Asian 12 0.2% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 3 0.1% Native Hawaiian 2 0.0% Guamanian or Chamorro 1 0.0% Samoan 0 0,0% Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0% Some other race 112 2.1% Two or more races 63 1.2% Race alone or in combination with one or more other races: White 5,213 96.3% Black or African American 25 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native 59 1.1% Asian 50 0.9% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 4 0.1% Some other race 130 2.4% HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 5,413 100.0% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 301 5.6% Mexican 245 4.5% Puerto Rican 4 0.1% Cuban 0 0.0% Other Hispanic or Latino 52 1.0% Not Hispanic or Latino 5,112 94.4% White alone 4,979 92.0% RELATIONSHIP Total population 5,413 100.0% In households 5,365 99.1 % Householder 2,541 46.9% Spouse 1,328 24.5% Child 1,069 19.7% Own child under 18 years 907 16.8% Other relatives 118 2.2% Under 18 years 31 0.6% Nonrelatives 309 5.7% Unmarried partner 114 2.1 % In group quarters 48 0.9% Institutionalized population 42 0.8% Noninstitutionalized population 6 0.1% HOUSEHOLD BY TYPE Total households 2,541 100.0% Family households (families) 1,566 61.6% With own children under 18 years 520 20.5% Married-couple family 1,328 52.3% With own children under 18 years 365 14.4% Female householder, no husband present 168 6.6% With own children under 18 years 109 4.3% Nonfamily households 975 38.4% Householder living alone 788 31.0% Householder 65 years and over 247 9.7% Households with individuals under 18 years 546 21.5% Households with individuals 65 years and over 734 28.9% Average household size 2.11 (X) Average family size 2.61 (X) HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 3,323 100.0% Occupied housing units 2,541 76.5% Vacant housing units 782 23.5% For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 586 17.6% Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 1.8 (X) Rental vacancy rate (percent) 8.9 (X) HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units 2,541 100.0% Owner-occupied housing units 1,527 60.1% Renter-occupied housing units 1,014 39.9% Average household size of owner-occupied units 2.16 (X) Average household size of renter-occupied units 2.04 09 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000