The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1999-07-13Prepared 7/8/99 *REVISED 7/9/99 **REVISED 7/12/99 *** REVISED 7/13/99 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high- value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. - BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, July 13, 1999 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated June 8,1999. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light & Power, June-10 and July 8, 1999 - Approval of: 1. Lyons Excavation Trenching Contract - Change Order, $5,430.00. B. Public Works, June 17, 1999 -Acceptance of: 1. Kitchen Co. bid of $213,298 and Weinland Const. Bids of $212,937.45 for 1999 Water Looping Project. C. Public Safety, Julyl, 1999. 4. Planning Commission, June 15, 1999. , 5. Setting Liquor Show Cause Hearing for'July 27,1999: A. Resolution #10-99 -B & B Food Mart - B. Resolution #11-99 - Beaver Point Quick Stop Grocery C. Resolution #13-99 - Notchtop Bakery & Caf@, Inc. Setting Liquor Show Cause Hearing for August 24, 1999: D. **Resolution #14-99 - Safeway Stores 46, Inc. E. **Resolution #15-99 - GHV-Colorado, Inc., dba The Stanley Hotel F. **Resolution #12-99 - Nicky's Restaurant & Lounge LTD. G. Resolution #16-99 - Park Wheel Co., Inc., dba The Wheel. 6. Resolution #17-99 - Setting public hearing for July 27, 1999 for New Tavern Liquor License filed by Hospitality Specialists, Inc., dba MOLLY B. RESTAURANT, 200-212 Moraine Ave. (Change of Class). 7. Special Event Liquor Permits: A. Colorado Hunter Jumper Association, August 7, 1999 at 1209 Manford Ave. (Fairgrounds). B. Lions Club of Estes Park, August 21, 1999, 470 Prospect Village Dr. (Brewery). 8. *Approval of Amended Transfer of Ownership Liquor License Application, naming New Stanley Associates, LP and GHV- Colorado, Inc. as joint licensees for The Stanley Hotel (Original Transfer of Ownership Application approved June 8, 1999). 9. Resolution #18-99 - Sponsoring the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (L.E.T.A.) into C.I.R.S.A. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Finance: - A. Presentation of Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting by Government Finance Officers Association - Mayor Dekker. B. Presentation of 1998 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Don Gruenler/Hiratsuka, Cassaday & Schaus, LLP 2. ***Amended Annexation Agreement for Wildfire Ridge - Removed from the agenda, to be considered at a later date. 2. Liquor Licensing: A. Public Hearing: Transfer of Ownership from Black Canyon Restaurants, Inc., to Twin Owls Steakhouse, Inc., 800 MacGregor Ave., Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License - Continue to September 14, 1999. B. Transfer of Ownership: From Snowdance Properties, Inc., to Wildfire Chefs, Inc., dba FRIAR'S RESTAURANT, Hotel & Restaurant Liquor License, 157 W. Elkhorn Ave. #11. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 1. NORTHERN COLORADO LODGE #3 Colorado Fraternal Order of Police 0 V.....9, July 12, 1999 Estes Park Board of Trustees 170 Macgregor Ave. Estes Park, Colorado Dear Mayor Dekker and Town Trustees, As President ofthe Northern Colorado Fraternal Order ofPolice, representing a majority of the officers of the Estes Park Police Department, we would like to bring to your attention an issue that affects the moral ofthe department and the ability ofthe department to attract and retain good employees. This issue is that of the pay plan ofthe officers and the length of time that it takes for an officer to move through the pay plan. These issues have been brought forth previously through city administration, but the problems still continues, and has become worse. Recently, you received a letter from the Estes Park Police Association bringing this issue to your attention. Assistant Town Administrator Randy Repola replied to the letter indicating that it was "unprofessional and counterproductive to the process of salary review. Personnel issues, including salary studies, are handled by department heads and town administration, not with the elected official. In the future, you would be better served to start this process at that level". Mr. Repola is mistaken in his response. It is every citizens right to have contact with their elected officials, who in this case, decide the above issues. Our goal, is to better the police department and attract high quality employees to the department. We do not wish to create conflict with the trustees, or the town administrators. Again, what we would like is to improve the working conditions of the Estes Park Police Department. There are two issues that we feel are relevant to this topic, The first is the issue ofthe pay scale. Currently it takes 15 years to move through the pay plan. This is in comparison to other departments that have officers topping out in 3-5 years. The second 0 issue is that ofthe pay itself, and how pay is set each year. P.O. Box 56 â€¢ Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 â€¢ Phone # 970-204-0256 NORTHERN COLORADO LODGE #3 Colorado Fraternal Order of Police 0 N#MY'*,2 The current pay scale that is used by the Town ofEstes Park takes 15 years to move from the starting position to the top position. The current, most senior officer with over 7 years of experience with the department is only making $3000/month. This is the starting pay in both Loveland and Fort Collins. Both of those agencies move their people through the pay plan in five and 3 years respectively. They attract other officers who are certified and experienced to their departments. Estes Park has had limited success in . getting qualified people to apply, and I would point to the last hiring process as an example. We would like to see the pay scale shortened. Yes, this would mean officers would reach top pay quicker, but that is more the market standard than what we are using. If merit system is to be applied to this also, it makes sense to reward people for making career accomplishments that impact their jobs. Items such as completing Field training, 0 probation, and then some time in the position to acquire experience would make for appropriate steps in the pay plan. It is important that we attract good candidates, and keep good officers. An example of a current comparisons to other departments is the following: An officer with Loveland PD, will be making $1366/month MORE than an Estes Park officer when you compare a 5 year officer with each agency. This is very significant and relevant when you are trying to retain employees and not become a training ground for other agencies. The second issue is the pay itself. We have included some comparison cities, and where Estes Park falls in relation to them. Our data for pay comes from the Colorado Municipal . League employee compensation manual for 1999. We did not pull out the data for our other benefits, but we are not ahead of agencies in this area either. If you wish us to provide data in this area, we would be glad to. We realize that Estes Park is in a unique situation. We are not as large as Fort Collins or Loveland, but our housing costs are nearly 50% above theirs! How can we attract, let alone retain a qualified officer, when an officer can start at what we pay our most experienced officer AND they will be paying $50,000 or $60,000 less for a home! This is not a hypothetical situation, it has occurred! We have included a lot of information in this packet. Some ofthe most informative information is that ofqualifying for a mortgage, pay comparisons and housing costs. We are asking the Town Trustees to consider the following to resolve this problem. First, 0 we would like to see the pay scale changed immediately. This will have a fiscal cost, but it is a fair move and is appropriate. The second would be to adopt a more reasonable pay survey for setting ofpay for our agency beginning in 2000. Louisville, Co had a similar situation where housing costs rose immensely for their town and their response was to pay their officers similar to those of surrounding agencies regardless of the size. We are I not asking that Estes Park be one ofthe top paid agencies in our area, but we are asking P.O. Box 56 â€¢ Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 â€¢ Phone # 970-204-0256 NORTHERN COLORADO LODGE #3 Colorado Fraternal Order of Police a. & 1 Â® that all factors be considered in setting pay and that it be done in a fair manner. We know that anything that impacts the budget of a town is an issue. However, it is strictly a matter of priorities in this case. The Town ofEstes has considered other request for funds for non-essential items and found them available in the budget. We look forward to hearing from you on this matter and are willing to work to resolve this problem. Please feel free to contact either the Estes Park Police Association or myself regarding these issues. Thank you, for your time and consideration on this important matter. Sincerely, Â«42 uÂ«--- Michael Thornton President, Northern Colorado Fraternal Order of Police (H)2306 Antelope Rd Fort Collins, Co 80525 (H/Fax) (970) 229-1898 . P.O. Box 56 â€¢ Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 â€¢ Phone # 970-204-0256 .k NORTHERN COLORADO LODGE #3 Colorado Fraternal Order of Police . 1999 PAY SURVEY AGENCY TOP PAY RANK Loveland 4366 1 Boulder 4340 2 Louisville 4103 3 Fort Collins 4034 4 Greeley 3979 5 Longmont 3940 6 Lafayette 3935 7 Larimer County 3840 8 Estes Park 3632 9 Evans 3524 10 Brighton 3492 11 Windsor 2934 12 0 Average Mean J Source: Colorado Municipal League, pay survey (1999) P.O. Box 56 â€¢ Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 â€¢ Phone # 970-204-0256 E.P.P.A. OV.*i d 4.1-,4 N.,9. *6.-,4 f; 0 1 1*.78 41431*6~ Police Association 0 June 21,1999 Randy Repola Assistant Town Administrator I Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Mr. Repola: I The Estes Park Police Association, consisting of the twelve non-probationary officers of the Estes Park Police Department, would like to share with you a brief overview of some important issues facing our police department. Our major areas of concern regard officers' pay progression and the current pay scale. . By gathering data from other Front Range departments regarding pay and benefit packages, it is evident our department's compensation and benefits fall behind standards compared to these other departments. An example of current pay progression involves the most senior patrol officer of our department. He has served the town for seven years and is currently at only 50% of the maximum salary of a patrol officer for the Town of Estes Park. In the majority of Front Range police departments surveyed, a police officer reaches the maximum salary within 3-5 years. Thorough documentation will be provided to support our concerns regarding compensation. While more information will be forthcoming, if you have any questions or comments before the information is received, please contact our designated representatives, Ray Leaycraft or Rick Life. We welcome the opportunity to seek solutions with you to address these concerns. The officers of the Estes Park Police Department are proud to serve the community we consider our home. . Respectfully, Estes Park Police Association cc: Mayor and Town Trustees Deputy Chief Filsinger Lieutenant van Deutekom Mike Thornton, Fraternal Order of Police COPY 4 *42) TOWN OF ESTES PARK * adil Z>- 24 5.- Â¥ .4.45 4 ~eâ‚¬41333~- -21Â»4%92 7 ~*ft,la-I::,649,~A~firt{Â¢94.91 72*,7531'4 5 >49;/49> .\ ' r) h â€¢'7 225% 0 A .2/2.-:,fÂ»19 NathÂ«Â«3**Â«4**04Â¢964428->Â»Â« ' . ..=DAN. 18396*~f'IF &5%3.32*94~-~ ~*930%4 4 J .~~~~~*f,t,4 3Â¥.// 4 . 1) 79.:~,r ~' .,Ebt>~~~* 2qz .-:-~~~3~+~'~t)5,..MJ':21:7L~ 2 --97*: -1 ...4> 1./4 *Â»PR.. ....I---:ttaÂ»-Â·4*67Â·,Â·. 4 i.~Â»leig.,:t,.1......: June 23,1999 Estes Park Police Association C/o Officer James Kenney, President Estes Park, CO 80517 Officer Kenney: The Town of Estes Park does not recognize the Estes Park Police Association as a representative ofany tow'n employee or employee group. Therefore, the Town will not respond to the Association in this matter. We will work directly with our employees to address issues that affect them. I am disappointed in the manner in which you have chosen to handle this issue. The actions of the Estes Park Police Association in this matter have been unprofessional and counterproductive to the process of salary review. Personnel issues, including salary studies, are handled by department heads and town administration, not with the elected officials. In the future, you would be better served to start this process at that level. Sincerely, 7Â» 41+- Randy Repola Assistant Town Administrator CC: Mayor Dekker Deputy ChiefFilsinger Lt. VanDeutekom Officer Leaycraft Officer Life File (970) .58(,-5Â·:11 Â· 171. 1101 1200 Â· 17() Al.Â·\C GREGOR A\'ENUE Â· ESTES PARK, CO 80317 Â· FAX (970) 586-28!1. JUL 12 '99 14:09 FR NORWEST MORTGAGE 970 229 1930 TO 2291898 P.02/02 Norwest Morrgage Inc 0..=r MORTGAGE Suite 110 3500 JFK Parkway Fort Collins.CO 80525 June 12, 1999 970/223-1856 800/283Â·1856 Fax 970/229-1930 To Whom It May Concern: Listed below are two loan examples, purchasini a home valued at the average price in Estes Park, on a 30 year fixed mortgage. 1. Based on a $3,000.00 income per month, purchasing a home valued at S185,000 with debts of $300.00 per month: â€¢ down payment would need to be $70,000, plus closing cost of $3,400 â€¢ loan amount of $ 1 1 5,000 (PITI payment of$974.Co) â€¢ ratios would be 32/42 C qualifying guide:ines see below**) 2, Based on a sale, price of $185,000 with 1090; down, with $300.00 debi per month â€¢ income would have to be $55,000 pcr year $4,583 per month â€¢ PITI with mortgage insurance of Sl.404 â€¢ Down payment of $ 18.500, would need approx. $4,900 in closing cosT . RatioB would be 31/37 **Ratios. housing debtshould not exceed 28% ofincome Total debt should not exceed 36% of income Should you have any questions on the above information, please call Inc at (970) 223-1856. (f 0 WE~.LS FARGO company A ** TOTAL PAGE. 02 ** . 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 - / ~/~~~~2.-*.6/144;46.2:11:ie-?~=Â·Â·Â·Â·c 1 - g U, .tr !11 EEFFFEFFm-Â·r+ITfiÂ·4Â·jt=Â·9'~~'~-rr:++ -+HÂ·11Â·1Â·HÂ·!,4 2 g g 42 46 - -34#12 WOUIBuol 0 2 ~ *~9 pueleA07 0 - 14 54 heiee,9 1998 Median Housing Cost Source: Estes Park Board of Realtors and Information Real Estate Services $274,000 $186,000 $1.24,500 004'Zli,$ 000'09 &$ $ 000'91 L$ $275,000 - $250,000 $225,000 $200,000 - 000'9Â£ :$ 000'00 :$ . 44,+4+w+40**FAmi Japinog 81 - I ...ArÂ·Â·Â·4Aw!- f t"9~<--' + #Mt tf ell!AS!nol U-,t tiEW*,4142 Â· ' r. rl +Ir*â€¢77tt-h ./H #IN-Iwl C Â·11:141 Nlillillii Mied se,sa 43*rm~t auee,Ke, 0 g 'ic,3JiP-ftftf##E~~4%ili~tij-â€ž-ft:~~1, WOUIBUol -diTIFI7-,~,/LJ+Ulfi:- L ,~r-r.TI~ â‚¬ Â·2~~- 4Â·J 4IÂ· Â·Â·Â· Â·__:ge.,i~4 . ~@~~~~ pUBI@Aol 00 M . 199 Median Condominium Cost So : Estes Park Board of Realtors and Information Real Estate Services 000'0ELÂ¢ $159,900 15% oo,*9.,s $139,500 ul 10 Â¥10 1.$ - 000'03&$ ogg:Zo:5 000'0 j :$ $170,000 $160,000 $150,000 $140,000 000'0Â£ :$ 000'00:$ Vision O By the Year 2005, the Town of Estes Park will be the prenlier mountain resort community in the United States, This vision includes: ' Being a caring organization sensitive to the needs Of our citizens, visitors, and employees. ' Having an employee teani that takes pride in being recognized as a model of innovation and perfolinance. ' Providing services which are responsive ancl reliable. Mission, The nzission of the Town.of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensming and enhancing the quality of life in our community by 0 being good stewards of public resoitices and our natural setting. . .*I e TOWN OF ESTES PARK 43. 822*, tzuav Police Department . fJ *1 -4.* a. t49 f- An::. - *Apia y W , ~ rt '4, 9~..1 0 , 4 y,te Leleh.V,4 Kf#90;U;43*%~ 3 5/#'~ 95*Fg ~ 2-7.%14+9'ELÂ£71 . 9 0 #u~ /,- --,- *34~~4621,F~* 5Fj.*i *h 5.&89.rek 6*.- -â‚¬*.. '31 . 2932*41,4Â£%3;I~Â·-f-__44~$4Â£*21%~. b ri,r re--6:2-y:t" 1 1 8 - Juhe 18, 1999 . MEMORANDUM TO: Police Department Employees ~ FROM: Deputy Chief Filsinger 4-9/ RE: "Perceptions" As most of you are aware. I attended the CACP Conference during the week of June 78 here in Estes Park. Throughout the Conference I was approached by both fellow attendees and instructors concerning their obsen'ations and contacts with our Department Personnel. Two Police Chiefs expressed that they had the unfortunate luck to be involved in crashes, but the pleasure of dealing with a "super officer" from our agency (Alberts). Both described the Officer as being genuine, caring and "very professional". A instructor from the East Coast had the opportunity to contact our Officers on the evening of June 9th as he asked for directions. This instructor told the class of police executives that he had the opportunity to see officers doing "real police work" something he "had not seen in years ': The instructor went on to describe that the officers were on foot, literally "walking" the beat and checking businesses. Other . conference attendees described having called the Com-Center and how impressed they were with the helpfulness andÂ·courtesy ofour staff. Finally, I received compliments on the professionalism and assistance provided by Officer Leaycraft during the Conference. It is difficult to describe how much pride you feel upon receiving this kind of feedback on your personnel. I u'ant to convey to each of you, whether or not you were specifically named, how liroud I am to be associated with you. Thank you, and keep up the great work! (3 - logtar (97(11 586-4463 â€¢ PO. 110% 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK. CO 80317 â€¢ FAX (9701 586-4496 - Aa . 1, ..1 m. 8/:.Et L ... -..0.- c -> '- 219-2,-CO E~ â€¢'31 '41:.V?? .8..I~ s ..:,1..:m-1.:=. A~r.,3-(22'b. 'k&,AI'_' t.(~A 1':9*Â·'M,Â·witÂ· %62'27>4:54: ;r 50?Y>13:1.34Â·!if '-: - rsy,Â·+D; 147: - ki'lt<.9,4 2...4.'?i 4.<.gr> 9 32 3.Â·49-':k-U..'3> - UÂ·4.4:.'*Â·. ~ 4).93.: , -5,-, Â·. liÂ£iÂ·:.?firtf P :lif. ?2.W':''I'~.~~~~2 +'.:.~.~.'~'..:~.. 1 4*kv<_ ~12:bfu.!.0 , CX) 1%149 *tetifff. 2*144 ffifit#} 't.vi:-*,i- i?6-i /'-*0.Â·p, . It .' 44*64 *91.321 34<Â·fitÂ· 4%3~ft{~ %43.4 '9~34,5tgr.. S'.-- , '. :iN:Â·333*Â·;Di .}'244>Mi# 4 :'Â·in,Â·as: r:.... 5%69(1 914*2 024'61 - ;. *r, 4 7231*?~': 44: jij<Â·fiwit!- ~9 ~ â‚¬5'3Â·"46 44-ijâ‚¬Rf:Â· 001& 42.431 4.1*tititÂ· ff 5.-4. g - lfÂ·49*k 3%Â·43Â·11Â· ir,to?wAL a'-7:1 Â·.i. I 4:2*:.Litit: %22.- 01{f)j~.i -%*tf: - R(fiti --01. - O %3*ile#EF &%*RexiMAEL F*1939..1* ifti:LitÂ· 44:<toic.ri Â·:Â·fi#,go,#Â·4 Ce!-7.'Â·R Â· i,,palÂ·4'44 *$3~ AM . 944224*9 , "iÂ·*:9'*Â¢ 4*.443# tift{*11*,2.0 24Â·34 Â·:<, 1.1+1 - 4%.P Â« .4. %.I .- . I ..14 9 ./ h AUTL I '41 j:Â»f ,1+1:2 4%~2>. 49}?72'Efil %447~ %4i~Â·RE<:' I.t. . , ... ,-Â· Â·Â·Â·; ~~: o.t >'Â·) aj;%4,8 26Â·* : Â·. i>' I .0.4,24 r. -B..1...6..f.'~*'. r,4'172- 0 Â·t:Â·. t.i-~t<Â·Â·Â· ff{4/036 340<7'A:tg:~ ifijbuL-fÂ· - *% 61971- if>~4} 167'i. it'~35 Fi*jÂ· y ...18,1/5 - Ar.0/6. -,29-li/&p- 9416#,5: -- Â·4*f 't ...........f.. n. b Â·1 .3,3:AV.A..7.r iiÂ®3,4 *'ge,WNÂ· $Â¥343~~ .i}~i~~RÂ·: ti~ 3;ki Ft â‚¬' ''tÂ·â€¢'IÂ·Â·*,Â· -1 .+/i'Z-/-. 1 1 9610:fÂ·.Ntt 240* 922:ga: 21,420.-23; 3>ii?â‚¬44&4 **3 244 ././ 09,2Â®f@h *>2424%% 23*128;i &**%92: *NAt.'.': 4,11:0'3 "Â·t~ 02.11'fi-Â·tty-U., *PRra F:%-*763, **p kita-#0 *.23 %44* Affy.-1,21 32 4,74(...4,069 .:..;.6.27Â·2*/ k.tt-*11:, -76: 1~6''ttl':i: '0 Â·. '.119Â© f..Â·.2.-Â· 2939 - *444 - -:t:*iwit - 8344{4 - - *fitf - *fiÂ·EW 0 ?AJ f iiÂ·.c ><i:Â·up >. Â·!/â€¢*,2421Â·â€¢ 7 ~1.;retÂ·y?*G' 910 Ul V â‚¬Â·4Â·40.21?' *4â‚¬04,4*5Â» 1.t,!,41â‚¬Â£1%:~. 5%944.* geÂ»@*1 9.4.,1...15 4 Â·75. $9*44 9*jo* 794Â·90:: C\1 I...4,2/.Sly. I U 59 0 *A *likiER<.F,0 6/4-0 4'41 449* *33- 493 1%*1 9%*21 52*: i ...'i. 5-/* I: ri -f. 200?R'*:441/ 44..3:v.Â·,.:4 *~,:~â€ž~:~flf i#~Â¢{Â«13? .f:39&17;2~ **:A 'ft;, j:*"4~25 136':79%6 *adli~%41&. *1*kt Â·,~ak:.'Â·i:&~ 1%*4 *#idÂ·iâ‚¬ 4157~~i:-: 2Â¥*10% 4%,r: . 44 *wit, *toety.: itip->,im *Â·gy*%; 14294% 44>34%iÂ·2 32 Mdrit"4'.r i'.4-0,?-itÂ¢22 41...: 6 . -'. 43...'.41.12.7:, ~*9.Â·93 .<tter.Â·0' -- (D 2 88 2& (D C m 9 (D C E O L- CU Perceptions of Conditions & Services in Estes Park od as Can Be ng Short *:~tyÂ¢rj":; Â·1!ede.19 eoueueju'elll Fire Protection Police Drinking water Â»fowl seol/\Jas oppal3 i 45 86eu!Bip Jele AA U ! ehl 6 4 Jo Al!.ler'liD Ile]GAO 32~ - r"Â·.=Â·-42#109Â·-PFÂ«fe fe./.r.*:.t.it-Â«1049*7Â·F;':->!Â»b')'pe~@0 -:4â‚¬-â€¢,Cr-.4.> :':.Â·Â·Â·:-*.~*N'Jb'<4Â· - 7.,4,4 A 4.4 1,30:;i,4 1,4,0 - , 0 %,tioti FtÂ·ilâ‚¬4: .44*<: :exâ‚¬~02~ p Hit*- 3%*ir *fi.4?.0 82%3- 0 .tkâ‚¬Â·NÂ·.9Â·rt-. . 9,jia %'Re.ft 4.9400, 0*4#4 he.-7*,>9ci &4*4 , 31â‚¬27-: r- â‚¬,Â·-1,-9 3*1 71. le;tte *161.<{Mit *451}' *634:y-F *24{13~fÂ· fitik..L-*,Â·~~:. fiXÂ·li- 22~ *XE (42%911. 4443,1 Le> 99:fik-.1 445.-i *21,;i Â· 32 <2*444..0 ,... ' ' : 422:2:3.i. 00 4tyÂ· Dif .8. + 7.. ir/ *v.. =6 ././.... I lie I : .... 54**it# ~~ :ti.;.ij,--â€ž,Â·:5~ ~.0-iÂ· Â·>2': :r~ 3.-7 * 1$~0 '~',04- '; :949,94Â·KÂ· YriffÂ¢,22 A--*.9.1.*-Â· 49./A ... .. . 1,/.110.' 1... ..# I. 7 ~0.f'' I- .... I .' ... . # I . . U .4.t 1, V #B..AN<Â·.~.:74.Â£ 4â‚¬82-4-* 4%434.9. 41)2~%';ag't- 9Ekil biiâ‚¬j'li-:f 2. ~7'' 4-.7....~ 2 51*.42:-7 %Â©i?47&; wy*â‚¬Â¢06.Â·. Al?H-'19%1(1 KA:41:.484 .' kÂ·key W. .. t?WA+*2;54* *art.*is;,3-b- ~-449~~). - *if:E,12 9~30#f - 444*4 --*914. Fffft. 93-fbki.. *11. %%.0 32 $:..n ju:211,4 1.4':~.fi?jt~:';:t Ble:09 *13;~'../' 0, 4973. i. Â· i t#Af. *1Â·41Â·t 4~~-Â».j- ,Â·trt.* 6*6334.-;'a. *irt.:Â·- :*t k,-8 1 i.ia''f'Z':.6 {89Â£77:f.~Ri. i "Â· g..: - 74 .9,)4~ '4 w **10 473 -a. i fi?Â¢84Â·in fit..09:35- .AN . v. I . I i. +143Â»Le.: 67-ECc~~.R;.,F~~p:..0.ul* , qi ..'2'* :*t_*.- rit': Â·M/1,4.2 4.4- , 4 Â· ./. ' - 4*83. *94 *47{U .9.4,24 53%0~4.9 :F'NF ~ ;a>.+44?Et .'3Â·,> 4%*Â·biv~:A.' .4-:.,Eg,* 3Â·216< 3.%;.i,4521..,:.1. ,4,+, -,,21124 ;:.N, ....4., ..6., - af@S-hiM:Â·y- 34~*40%0 ,'1#6Â·i.FAAN; *4i;,4.4, li'*229-4Â£ ifi:'.'IkÂ·,t -- <9 94{?31_*FiE'Â·_%%24 *:~Â°:f>.::*x meÂ·94 0% 4% F."34- y ft(*49.4-:2.=_:46:;i Â· ..:00-<. _â€ž. ' 'ub ... 0 C 0 C olga)0 E C C C 41 ...A -4-0 CUC 0 0 0 0-CO 1-CJJ 2*2 1-moo 04-0 -5-2 -C 1- 0 Cal) 0 - CO 0 .*106 cncc C 4.'.h 0 110 (D cO 00 E 0 0 . L. O 1 CU COCU(D Â° 0 2 2 1- L. --1 CD > L - com 0-0 LU O CO & E 0 CO -O 0 CUD L- L- 4= Perceptions of Conditions & Services in Estes Park Falling S %09 rking availabilityÂ·c -1:8 28 -a) â‚¬0 4 2 1.=20* = 89 8-1 =2-2.-z i:; 1 0 e i.ga. 44-2 -2 21 Â¤. 3... 0 11 rilm le 0 as I 76 32 5 8.-2-E 9-22:2*g=-,=92 25+41* Â·dy a) .&2 % o= 1 -9 E 3-se -3 g.s .8 0 W O =Â¤ GO. f 0 922 ~'' r & 6 1 Â°: 01 &8 22 2 B.3 0'0Â·5 4, 2 1 48 39; 3 0314!1 -Â¤ (6 (1) 3 2.E & C: 4: 2 0 Â® 0 .k 0 1.t~-1= 4 0.032.9.ESTAM g:,~1:Â§,~-4~22 E .Â£20 78--W i;%Â·E.Fral #4*134; 3 ~~#r~ GEUM .- Â£ 0 a W = =44 9 4 M 0 -4 a A 6. 0 0..06 2.9.2:0-2/Â¢1.62,6 i If. v/i.w/m, mmi,w.In; ~Li)#LIal~~<~4617UCHOUn#UVUC. W -A-AnAA.1AA,~~~~~t a liftj 4 ir ai - 4.1 0-* (0 0 ' P "##;# ##11 te ,##11(4#11Â£Ulil-iU #,111#1111,#1â€žI, 4 â€¢~ W .8 ..1,1~E> . O 0 3 ICEEr. ' - Â·- :O :t: 6 0 - â€ž ~ Nlift, f 4,(1#:ill, fl"lu-LULI,I##I,I//1/,I, .iÂ£,NO:k: *1 "- a. c. e**242" g *V-,7.2 f --Lt . 9:4 W -.11111111 S.0 ..2.9.:.--84<.4;243& SNMO...pilÂ·*Bl 71 lilli. .. *7 f' 94-6/// ......22!ZI0ID2ZBE252517>?E Â· 21-it 46&Â£ f.- 2,1 - ... - =92255.Ce m. 2 * .Al uuuu - I O, f. (5 . mr D e a, C)..X. Oc f.. 733rzq-r I/I i-:.t.Rt. 10 -1.-1- .~ ~.3 litililifi,TITillITUTPI / 2,~S /:iru'-1 - *... 2 '34.-- A.4-1.2:.1 ... 3.-: a t>.*,>54 .- 2 -4: 9.31 :.-L~II/OIOOIO~IIOIC:crt:.911 52.-84. tie;.~ 20 A .- a) ...........0,:.'411 'F:ti' ' . 6%9 " _ E .Lt .Le:. - 1 0+, . ./I'Il'.6. 3/ - :3..Nitite . 1 - .'-- fr' -1*- ...t1-Ir- O '~ * jam= 48*:3441Â°*4 4 ~la, - O .....t#.1Â£49*. d-'~4,- e;:2'/12~~.Il...0 ' 10 d U) 1 , C;UNâ„¢Rg ' 4@â€¢- inme, ...4 . . 2 1111111111 11111111111111 1Â·.,45Â®fri*Â·30 1 Cl)Â· 1.8:,~7:-1492/202~2., - . ................. 39:ap-/12.- 2 , 33 -8- itri--w. - f - .., s .8 -1 23- - O/* - ...1 .... .... .... .1., .... lili .: 1 1 11 1 1 . I . f 14= 0-2--2-Â·IRS g *42 ~. 8 ~ :-. OF . e.? ~,674-1 6 754 .' u 2? '= 1 U... 0-2 9, 204 1 7.1 f ' . I. ... I fforda scarce i elin eignbs weanesday edition february 17, 1999 ~ Estes Park, Colorado -1~2Â«-Cl Ge,z dNMIW Â¢+As jo Jodi Low-priced n EstesPark, Colorddol 0 4.it; .: - Volume 29, Numbe<71 50Â¢ ,usihg scarce in 1998 ,.Iâ€¢â€¢1-!!.M. Under-$100,000 homes ~Â·i 4.;, disappear, but average w i: sale price jumps $11,800 1 ./ 0. ki \ 2 By JACKIE HUTCHINS 3 Last year's averaderprice represented an increase of 5 r. % 0 -I ' -For the first time in history, percent, compared with 1997'd 4 Estes Parkk real Â· estate com- average of$209,467: .Â· 1 - < j, panies went through a year The median price Â·- the $ , 1, selling no houses- under price ofthe home inthemiddle 2 $60,000, Â«not even a cabin with of the range of sale prices last f T < P no bathroom," Board of Real- year - was $186,090.14 . tors executive officer Rita After the receht steep jumps Kurelja reported. , in average house price; Mc- 'i Only four homes sold in the Creery and.Kurelia.feaid ..they - under-$100,000 category in hope the 5 percent increase isa 1998, all of them in .outlying sign that the housi~W-,inarket . is about to stabilize,-with more Yet while low-priced homes moderate rates of inflation. ..,Gi.Â· , , average sale price jumped Â· rise again, but it's going to be ' m.'- areas. became a scarcity in 1998, the "Ihonestly believe it. will $11,800, showing there is still Â· at a lower rate," McCreery 70.4, 1 4 1 a ready market of buyers.:f . r 124'i t' f k': ~-.Within the.Town-=of Estes Affordable Is hard to *Ad,,Â· :1 . .It.1 f.-tat f Ni Â·Â· ,- Â·. .Â·, Â· Â·~., 4 4 : IM 2 . I < C der $100,000 irarely come on . j q Park, single-family houses un- For Megreery,3 the figures . 1 3 the market anymore. 1 Point td'Whit she alleady knew Currently there' ate' only -Â· afrordable housing,talready 1994 3 z 1995 -:...1096 0 . '31997/ 2Â·01998''L Â·Â·- 7 Â·' ; , foui kingle-family hdmes listed. hard to find ip the *roa, is: be. Park Board of Realtorâ€¢' Militiple usting SerylÂ¢*. Â· 7 1, - in,thÂ» Multiple Usting BerÂ¥ice 3 - comingincrea~ingly.icl~c,. re-v'.4:.Nl,Uto.**116#*:..(*ri:94.:#etc==vr.-=i ...2:,#.1, .,, .#''tl*~9*89*1$0*0[N#K#telfilt nÂ»48*totthal;j:*0~~asu... - $1*,140.6000~ C.gÂ¢iÂ¢'..7 '.0.- -1 u' V ' hame['bliyefs andipÂ¥6&,sional ~'Mfin gl.A..4.'. 7/: 9.3~rt-77-;fl,%..I. 41':am.,1 5~8~~~6~f YZ-9 ~Â°ple~.~ike.terelis;.tnurses ~ n lind sm*11-bitdin*se(of**efhare Cedar Park and one, with just Â· being priced Â·out of.â‚¬IY6 Estes ie 2% in January cated in town id the neighbor. from People who.want houses 500 square feet anil only a Park housing market. 7 1 three-quarters bathroom, is 10- "We get calls allthe time hood near the hospital. , and vacant land they can af- r Meadows gate, with at just 5,798, a 43 percent. de. Buyers who are currently fordÂ·" mople admitted there, crease compared with January lookin6 for affordable hou,ing Properties at the lower end ent increase. 1998: may also notice a new tr6nd on of the spectrum often go under 11 River entrance saw The Park16 Otlier !,liItor en- the inairket - the condon,ini- Contract within days of being *ple, a 3.9 percent trance gates reported 11,053 mizing of former rental cabins listed, she said. ' visitors,.a 28.7 percent de- and cottages. KureUa said she, believes west side, the Grand crease. Several such units are now eventually service workers , saw 4,255 people, a nt decrease, and the Putney said the park admit. for sale at prices ranging from may be unable to afford to live ley Road, used for ted seven tour buses last* $65,000 for a 383-square-foot in Estes Park, forcing' them' to cottage to $102,000 for a 700- commute from other communi- le access to the adia- month. i square-foot cottage. . ties, much like in the ski re- *hal forest, saw He reported 126 campers wrhat's why affordable hous- Â· sorts. ittants,an 82.2 petâ‚¬ used Park campgrounds, 87 in ; ing is needdd so badly,Â»Â·Estes Â«If we don't get some afford- asa ' 1 ~ tents and 39 in campers. Park Board of Realtors presi- able housing, I think so too," ' 1 ~,49///41/45/#,8lilli'111 14 -VUL" .....6 -4/4 W.lu, " I.I. J..06 W --.. #i....... ae 2% in January cated in town in the neighbor- from ppople whowant houses 500 square feet and only a Park hlusing market. three-quarters bathroom, is 10- Â«We get calls all the time Meddows gate, with at just 5 798, a 43 percent de- hood near the hospital. and vacant land they can af- Buyers who are currently ford." pie admitted there, crease co'mpared with January looking for affordable housing Properties at the 1Qwer end at increase. 1998. River entrance saw The Park's other minor en- the market - the condomini. contract within days of being may also notice a new trend on of the spectrum often go under dple, a 3.9 percent trance gates reported 11,053 mizing of former rental cal)ins listed, she said. vest side. the Grand visitors,.a 28.7 Vercent de- and cottages. Kurelja said she believes crease. Several such units are now eventually service workers :aw 4,255 people, a t decrease, and the Putney said the Park admit- for sale at prices ranging from may be unable to afford to live y Road, used for ted seven tour buses last $65,000 for a 383-square-foot in Estes Park, forcing' them to 3 access to the adja. month. cottage to $102,000 for a 700. commute from other communi- ~nal forest, saw He reported 126 campers 'Â°I'hat's why affordable hous- sorts. square-foot cottage. ties, much like in the ski re- rants, an 82.2 per- used Park campgrounds, 87 in ing is needed so badly," Estes "If we don't get some afford- a ' tents and 39 in campers. Park Board of Realtors presi. able housing, I think so too,Â» amobile and horse There were 256 backcountry dent Linda McCreery said. McCreery said. Park was reported campers. Â«Service people and young Since F.O. Stanley arrived professionals have a tough in Estes Park just after the time affording anything they tum of the century, Estes Park want to live in," she said. has been a resort town and If there were more afford- needs to provide for the people z able houses listed, real estate who serve the visitors, she *NF agents would have no problem said. 1-1 1 , ;2 I . selling them, she said. Â«We need a place for every- 411 - ,- "The Realtors understand body who's working to support , - 14-S 4 1*L there definitely is a need for the resort town to live.Â» - f= P ~1 .15?-5 the affordable housing, espe- cially for first-time buyers and Condos more affordable 1 .1--4 44~ + service workers." Many of those who need af- fordable housing, are buying Residential sales rise townhouses and condomini- for 1998 show that sales vol- had for under $100,000. Real estate sales statistics ums, some of which can still be ume increased 22 percent to a Last year 12 townhouses or 4 -1.1.~ record $73 million. condos sold for under $100,000. 1- 3 The statistics show 402 With some units selling for properties sold last year, the as low as $59,000 for a 300 fourth highest year on record square foot unit to as high as for numbers of sales. $479,532 for a 2,075 square Residential sales also rose foot luxury townhouse, the av- .f - ~* * I. I' r 22 percent, accounting for erage price of a townhouse or -ill'.-1-'+0%,9"1# litl- , nearly $46 million of the total condo last year was $163,035, 2-t]At sales. an increase of 16 percent over 5* y# 4-1111- "U,ASILIL .%4<3&.' 1997 townhouse sales. The shifting of prices from . The median price was 4 11 the lower end of the spectrum $160,900. - Kurelja noted that some _ to high costs continued last people like retirees may buy year. In 1988, 105 of the 168 townhomes because it is what homes sold in the area - 62.5 .they want, but most buyers percent - went for under would prefer a single-family , $100,000. house. _ Even in 1992, when home Townhouses take longer to . sales prices began to climb in sell, with the average time on i Photo by Mark Slupe the area, 100 of the 205 homes Â· the market bding 308 days, sold, or 48.8 percent, sold for although the number is influ- under $100,000. enced by presales of not-yet- the weighted sled. The winning But the average price has built units, which are listed as 0 dog, Winston, a St. Be'rna'rd/mastiff skyrocketed from $92,440 in being on the market until they mix pulling 640 pounds, is owned 1988 to $221,289 last year, are brultand the sales close. by Tom Roberts of Deer Trail. when 95 of the 207 homes sold * - 45.9 percent - cost ~ $200,000 or more. See REAL ESTATE: Page 7 0 4 0,/ 1 . 7ket)43 11-r-k -1-roj 1 a._Â·z-erll-e-0 Pkk r7+1l 1999 - 11 . .4 - .1 Real estate sales in EP h el, ...,1.-1. - 1 1,11 11 $80,000,000 - ~013*1 .~ ~ $70,000,000 - and:thefut 4*Im $60,000,000 : K (~ $50,000,000 -3 E- -2 .1 Z -6 . -1 .: 21 -:Â·-2 - Il U,L Â·14*Ii 31â‚¬-*1;56 - r . 7..2 ,6,~2 2 :,| $40,000.000 - 4.11.- ... . 1 #111! 11Â·k $30,000000 ; - V-.4 42- dA< AVA 1* 2,/ 11 1, 1 6 .L- ./ 4 -~ *--f & '0 - ~ 7.5-.0 14 N . - UL-- Â¥ Spacious apartn /,L...."21.:91, *1 0,000,000 -4, Delicious, whole 60 - , 4 Activities avoila 4 . m .2 5 0 1 V. Relaxed, comfor . ---- 2 ~M 2-*Naming nÂ® - . V. 1 -1~*... 1.21 Â¥nIMQI - 1 m 00 fl-/' 1, 1 1, \ O, C. C. C. C, Ch C. r P - . p - P '* Licensed profess 1 1 1,10 1111.11 ..p, 1.Ul -' 1 Ul A ,-1 Ul -1 Ul -1 Ul -1 Ul . '* Weekly houseke, W No long term co I W Scheduled transi lu I - ~i ,,=~-?ft{~*Ffittlt,~ Aff~*.*-'-i~'' 2.Â·1 . 215 SHUPE CIRCL[ Reil **tate.prices rise..:..... ~grmi~18 ill. ... (Continued from Page 1) 3:-Â·i . t 3-" f : Â·price was $134,425 and averi ----UJ..P age size was 4.47 acres. â€¢WBE.efi..#W~ Have a 1 - / For some -of those units it In Quadrant 4, primatily takes more thanfour years Carriage Hills, the average Stay on top of Bobcat,sports St from the time they go on the price was $76,557 and average with the Trall-Gazette. mark&t until closing. acreage was 1.16 acres. Single-family homes last In Quadrant 6, the Big year sold in: an average of 159 Thompson Canyon and Cedar --0 daysi Kurelia said. 1 1 : Springs, the average price was The more affordable proper-i. $44,367 and average size was ties 's611 more quickly..: ~ c = 8.91 acres. . e,KNUAL AMATI Townhonids 'Dbiced under In Quadrant 6, the $100,000 sold in an average of Pinewood Springs, Estes Park 120 days last year. Estates and Big Elk Meadows . Houses in_thatipice range area, the average price was sold in an averagb, of 93 days, $46,300 and average lot size ' . and housed prices betwedn was 5.18 acres. 11 -: $100,000 and $150,000 sold in In Quadrant 7, th6 Al- . an average of 134 days.1 Â· 1 IN . lenspark and.Meeker Park . Lower mprtgageiates help, 6 -:,area, the, average price was : . . $107,736 and average lot size 4, : McCreery and Kureba said was 17 acres. a loWering of mortgage Tates Calling ,â€ž.... 601,4.A in- Business CateGories 1981 1983 1985 1986 1988 Â£66L 1989 9661. 966L Â£661 866L 1 vilownhomes,priced-Emidâ‚¬r,147.0..Tii-7-Qaidiant ::4.6;Ti tb,7 *,2 , Estateâ‚¬ and 13ig Elk?Â¥eadowh 1 r jIHihkAlin.thsttlince range : z area, th~average'#ice' was . dold.36*Â·**agd of. 93.days;DZÂ»48,300 a*8409r4e:lot {size - 1 i . a*d lt6,**,36*ichÂ£'bA#din ~ rwas 6.18 acrUP< i ~ ~ ..1 , 'I , $109;0Â® *421*180400 .bld jh. Â· In YQuaddnt 1* the, Al- .: 5Â¢hve~4*iÂ°f3919*40:4 7,- lensitar]Â¢22!id <MeeÂ»< Park .: .. . Lower mertgagefates herpik :'. * area, Ke average pric@\*as . a . $ 107036 and average lot sike . . . McCreery and Kurelja said Wis 17 acres - Calling . a lowering of mortgage rates last y6ar may have helped in- Business categories crease housing sales. e 'It would make a difference h, There were fewer cbmmer- , in whethet some *6ople gould ~*Urbpertaes L those thatin- I alrord a-120-ud,TW hot;Â· 101Mia-5-clude,land-*414 in the.are#4.- /-Â· . .. . , .12:1Â·-Â·C 000 nar noted. 'Â·>76.:Â·Â· '1'Â£41 24:Â·, "7Â·last year, butniore business Â·Â· 2 Where once there were OPPOrtunities = businesses many more cash sales for resi- without land - were sold. dences, last year 82 percent oft' McCreery noted that many home buyers required some more business sales take place I form of loan to make their pur. in the area, but are not listed chases. ~' with the Board of Realtors 25 WINNEI Seventy-four percent 4 of Multiple Listing Service and condo buyers requireda loan to are not included in the annual make their purchases. sales statistics. Cash remained the primary The Board of Realtors re- way of financing purchases of pported the sales of 10 business 0 vacant land., opp6rtunities last year, an in- , The Board of Realtors re- crease from seven id 1997, . The average price was CONTEST RULES: ported 54 percent of vacant $65,650 and the tiverage time land sales last year' were fi- on the market 329 days, al- maer must mide b te Estes Valley - nanced by cash. . St'Sscape, its people: its wildlife though the range was from â€¢ Entries must be unmounted 18*10 or *mailed ' , High demand for vacant land $8,500 to*198,000 and from 83 to 685 days. â€¢Block & White or color prints of amateur ~. ~ Sales of vacant land rose stalus accepted- prints only, nocomputer- Only four commercial prop- slightly from 1997 levels, but erty sales were reported, with - are,still well below the boom an average price of $405,875 ized scanned images or emails. years of 1989 to 1995. and average time on the mar- . â€¢ Limit of 10 entries per person =There isn't as much land to ket 102 days. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Entries must be I with name, address, -phone and category (People & Pets, r- sell,0 McCreery explained. The range was from Nature/Wildlife or Miscellaneou4 4 *' A high demand for vacant $250,000 to $725,000 andhom . Enclose a seli.addressid, stamped err!ope land coupled with a low supply selling on the first day on the has driven the price up, she market to 189 days. , forreturn of Photos..,or drop off and pickup at ~stem lÂ·Hour Photo added. . The Board of Realtors alsd â€¢ Allentries must be received by 5 pm., March The Board of Realtors re- reported the sale of one time- 5,1999 ported 92 vacant land sales share unit and one income â€¢ Photos must havebeen token between Feb. 1, , last year, five more than in rental property in 1998. 1998.and March 5,1999 The average price paid for a ., D : lot was $116,787, an increase Weight Loss .. of 13.8 percent compared with Puzzles Doctors WEEZERN / 1998. The average size of lot sold ~ ATLANTA, GA -- Doctors were sur- 0 last year was 4.62 acres, for a prised when two separate studies found 9 to 6 Daily cost of $25,146 per acre, the help cause significant weight loss. that a natural dictary supplement could Closed Sunday 1-HOUR 1- 101 West Elkhorn ~~ second highest average cost Although not conclusive, both studies '285SJ j p*r acre ever reported by the found that patients receiving the formula 586-8522 n=*0+C,Ng.AS=L~ Board of Realtors, but well be- called Bio-Rex 3000T. lost more than low 1997's average cost of group on the same fat reduced diet. Nci- twiceasmuch weight as thoscinacontrol , $84,778 per acre. thergroupwasinstmctedtodecrease the T But the increased cost of amount of food they ate or to increase land was modest compared theircxercisc levels. Anarticlepublished in the American Journal of Clinical Nu- with recent years. * Employees c trition says that you don't have to de- Land prices rose 25 to 27 crcasc the amount of food you cat to lose percent per year from 1994 weight, provided that you limit the fat. .~U:[.lt.D[.16 through 1997..Â·, Accordingtoaspokesperson forPhillips I ' Lots sold last' year in the Gui f Corporation. the Â¢exelusive North immediate Estes Park area American distributor of Bio-Rex 3000, 7 . . 5 tended to be smiller, but more the company is considering additional ,NAME costiv. studiesin orderto get federal â€¢nnrn,>.1 i. l ~-55 - un Poofc dit** 3~ as .< 6.v @EMFF x e *Miy,%27 TOWN OF ESTES PARK 4,3i~ii.J._ 4r2Â» 14* 42*th- ~334-Â·Â·- 1#. -c.. ---4:~ *MyÂ¢2- 2.963 17'* /14 Â»%4491 - I â‚¬ltÂ¥>%f~%33Â»59.- .,,4, ..2*.4..<, .-1,.1 ->, /./rfili~67~%651Â£'*6. .-- â‚¬=a. Rich Widmer , 3%496: Town Administrator 9~4'.,1 /bate: - --OloD&~ber 20, 1998 To: Honorable Mayor Dekker Town Board of Trustees From: Rich Widmer I Subject: 1999 Pay Plan 1. MERIT PAY In January 1996, Town staff began implementation of a new Employee Development Plan/Performance Review system. After using the new system for almost three years, we are convinced it is preferable to non-merit based approaches. In January of this year, performance goals were set for all employees. Progress toward achievement of these goals was reviewed with the employees in June and July. Additional review was held as necessary. During December, all employees will receive the annual Performance Review portion of I the Employee Development Plan, which includes a review of goal achievement and performance in twelve areas. It is our recommendation that all salary increases for 1999 be merit-based, with all employees eligible for up to a 5% increase based on performance. The "framework" for merit awards will be 0% for a 'Below Standard" rating, 1.5% for a "Standard" rating, and 1.5 - 5% for 'Above Standard." The departments' recommendations will be reviewed to assure that raises are based on inlividual achievement. Past experience has shown the departments are doing a good job with this new approach to pay for performance. 2. SALARY ADJUSTMENTS A. Police: Each year we review our Pay Plan against data on all other cities and towns in Colorado provided by the Municipal League. Our review this year indicates that some pay grade adjustments need to be made for police officers to bring them more into line with the market. Even though we raised the pay of all sworn officers except the chief 5% in addition to their merit increases in 1998, the data shows our salary ranges have Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 actually declined in pay range comparisons from last year. It is our recommendation the following adjustments be made to the police pay structure: 1) Create a Police Officer Ill position as grade 16. 2) Regrade Police Corporal and Police Investigator positions from grade 16 to grade 17. 3) Create a Community Resource Officer position as grade 17. arrej 4 4) Regrade Police Sergeant position from grade 18 to grade 19. 5) Regrade Police Administrative Lieutenant and Operations ; '10Â£- Jivc~7--7 Lieutenant positions from grade 20 to 21. 6) Regrade Police Captain position from grade 21 to grade 23. No new personnel are proposed as a result of these recommendations. The cost of these recommendations is estimated at 0.5% of payroll. B. Others: Review of CML and other data indicates we should also regrade three other positions. The Special Events Director, Museum Director, and Town Clerk grades should be changed from Grade 18 to Grade 20. It is our 0 recommendation these regradings be done, at a cost estimated at 0.3% of payroll. The total theoretical amount required for all pay related increases explained above is estimated at 5.8%; however, past. history of using the merit system indicates the final number will be closer to 4.8%.0 Five per cent is in the budget 0 for pay adjustments. t - -+olice066ntinue to-get kudos in customer service surveys 3 officers receive New officers announced " ing his leg in Repola also reported the Po- two places Special Citations lice Department has hired two with a metal new officers and rehired one bar. for superior work who left the department a few Three teenagers months ago. . By JACKIE HUTCHINS Officer Mark Swallow re- have been Public Safety turned to the EPPD after de- charged in ; ~/ ' The Estes Park Police De- ciding he preferred it to a new .the case, and two of th4 sus- partment continues to be better job at the Boulder Police De- pects, although juveniles, have tyÂ· than commendable but not partment, Lt. Mike van- .Â· been charged as ddults:due to -the serious nature of the crime, - quite outstanding in its aver- Deutekom said. age customer service survey vanDeutekbm noted. :, 2Â«7 . Â·"We were very sorry to see scores. 7 him leave,Â» he noted, but the 4, Roth also was 'cited' fof mal[- ing a voluntary citizen contact i.~ /,-2:'-'.--- t -Â» Police Chief and Assistant department was glad torehire on April 28that led to the dis- - ~ / Town Administrator Randy him. Repola reported patrol officers The new officers are Sheila covery of a clandestine received scores ranging from Baker and Kent Brandskd. , methamphetamine lab, for dis- 4.51 to 4.79 during the surveys Â· covering another such lab after , done in the first quarter of Three officers commended making a vehicle contact on 1999. i The Police Department su- Jan. 25. Four means the officer was pervisors also reported issuing "He is an example to us all commendable; a score of live is commendations to three offi- in the Police Department," van- Deutekom said. outstanding. cers for their recent actions. Repola told the Public Safety Officer James Kenney *as Officer Ryan Alberts also re- - . ,Committee Thursday, May. 6, praised for taking the initiative Â·ceived a letter of cokillnenda- that 104 customir service sur- 06 ADril 25 to search area tion for his efforts in ~helpihe-- veys were done to assess patrol motel parking lots for the ve}li- Roth in the investigation after officer performance in the first cle of a person the Greeley Po- the Jan. 25 traffic stop. three months of the year. lice Department had reported Fire Department assistance Another 24 surveys were tal- might be suicidal. lied to assess services provided In Fire Department action, After a 49-minute search, he Estes Park Volunteer Fire De- by support service personnel in I the Police Department commu- found the victim's vehicle in partknent Chief Scott Dorman nications center. the Holiday Inn parking lot, reported the force is poised to Those employees got scores and then located the room in sign a mutual aid agreement ranging from 4.72 to 4.92. which the woman was staying, with Platte River Power Au- Repola said not all of the and entered the room after thority. surveys have been glowing, an d there was no response to a The agreement still needs to when the department has knock on the door. get the approval of Town At- He found the victim uncon - torney Greg White. received one indicating service was less than good, follow-up is scious as a result of attempting The Public Safety Commit- done. suicide through ingestion of tee decided to recommend the But, he noted, the officers prescription drugs and wine, agreement to the town board cannot please everyone all the and the emergency room physi- for approval, pending input time. cian told Kenney's supervisor if from the town attorney. 0 Â«We don't promise 100 per- he had not intervened the Dorman said the agreement cent service all the time," he woman probably would have will require that the EPVFD - said. soon died. respond to Platte River emer- The customer service scores Officer Scott Roth received gencies, if requested, and it for both police officers and com- three letters of commendation. also will allow the local de- munications staff are slightly He was cited investigating a partment to tap into some ser- higher than reported for the case that occurred on March vices that PRPA has, including fourth quarter of 1998, when 28, when three assailants an arson dog to assist with scores ranged from 4.38 to 4.68 broke into the home of a man investigations of suspicious for officers and from 4.24 to who was sleeping, held him fires and greater capacity for 4.44 for dispatchers. down and attacked him, break- dealing with chemical spills. e )Â·,1. 4.45-p,~'4.0, ~i Police uhcover largest-ever â€ž,eth labln Larimer County A routine traffic itop and thony J. Andrewk, 32, of Den- - Filsinger said. disbovery -of an'outstandink-11*d~:314<1542*4214 4-1-.I'Â·.Â·' U,..4 , After th4 firemen deter traffic warrant>led to discovery *9 OfficeriEric Rose said card- mined the scene was safe, th, Wednesday tiof ' whail~;lthe >lboard had been placed over the cabin was secured and a spe Larimer County Drug Task windows of the cottage, and cialized drug investigation Force is calling the'laitg*t 2th#t, 'kilont *ith the 66'cond team was called in to help with methamphetdihide p;Gductidn I ' man's' refuial to hAW69 ques- the investigation. lab ever found in the county.'2 tions; led policefto slispect Filsinger said the team said 0 2 :-'It was the second time in sb*mething illegal was taking. an extremely elaborate, large- f :, three months - area police have --place inside, and th detained scale methamphetamine lab FÂ·.- found a methamphetamine lak Andrews and. b1tgah work to ' hadbeenset up in the cabin. set up in a local lodging estab- obtain a search Warrant. C - .. Rose said cottage managers 'v % lidhment Â· ' While still awkiting0 the told him the men checked in. Deputy Chief of Police Gregi fiearch warrant, Rose said, he Tuesday night. Filsinger r'eportdd Troy -A.Lesaw smoke coming from the . Andrets had rented the 2,. Mayers, 25, of Denver, wastcabin and smelled a suspicious unit, investigators said. -, Â· Â·~-:t. juD.Â·picked up on the'traffic war>9odor ahd summoned the Estes ; A:Filsinger said Andrewd was - rant out bf'Addms CouAG' ;Park Voluntee'r Fire Depart- , arrested on a charge of unlaw- f- shortly after 11 a.m. Wednes- dient for a hazardous materials ful manufacturing of a Sched- day, and he told officers he had response call. 0 . ' ule II controlled substance, a : been staying at a cabin in the * Firemen wehE inside, where Class 3 Felony. ~ 600 block of Moraine Avenue. they determined there was no Mayers was arrested on a Police responded to Tele- fre, but there was evidence of charge of unlawful use of a mark Cottages, where they possible methamphetamine : contacted another man, An- manufacturing in progress, See METH: Page 2 Meth lab ~ontinued from Page 1) ....... Schedule II controlled sub- stance, a Class 5 felony, as well as the traffic warrant. Both men were transported - Â· * to the Larimer County Deten- Mon Center in Fort Collins. - processed methamphetamine - Â« An undisclosed amount of and chemicals used in the manufacture were seized, into possible involvement by Filsinger added. Investigation is continuing others. Agencies assisting the Estes Park Police Department in the investigation included the . service, Larimer County Drug EPVFD, Estes Park ambulance Task Force, North Metro Drug Task Force and the Drug En- forcement Agency. Ij:~ 1. ~~ i Â·- r,sp~.* 42,Â·~113 '-~,(2INfW#U~%.f '~3~R: 0~ 2,741'7Â·Â·#F Â·9â€¢;wela~Â·~Â·,1&#frbi-*.4*F~~*4@~'~- - '0wnâ€ž~pret Â·mittee.hs ' Â¢ Pei ideth#es dlimb b .. *70/ u. 1 vy ~ A other enti f -.... ..4 - .,--Â· electricÂ·ar - ,,.42 . c ..1 0 J :Al & 114*. 49 0 1 ' h - seÂ¥6â€¢Itvt level relatively 16* supplifrs. The COI meeting ~ r. . 7. 1 ff 4, ..f' i < 1 ."$40 t..'....:"tÂ· ' . tr- T t. 02 1/;i...'. L Â· . Jan. 1, ai A Local thieve& get away with $83,000 inAstolentcash other are ... . '.. ~'Â·~ the big da 4 By JACKIE HUTCHINS , , fenses in 1997. Theft Cases e~ ToWn get Â· hold steady . 1- f . j ' ' The Estes Park Policelle- i RRb,ry.and assaults Repoli 91 partment's caseload rose nearly Three robberies were re- The re ~~ sessed al were 138 fÂ¢ - 7 Dercentlast year.Â»Â» 9 ported last year. -The EPPD com*nunicdtions >Filsinger said the robberies Â·theft cases, a h centef disf-atched police: on - the taking ofmoney or items L flig ht Public Safety h increase' over / 15,709 callâ€¢in:1998,- an in- from people by force - oc- crease of 6.8 percent*over 1997 curred atNational Park Villaga 1997'â€¢ 13.5 ~-IC levels> c j Â·:' 4 Â· f q ' . South, Taco Bell and Stanley reported thefts. Theft cases include thefts Includink lodal Fire-De- Village. ; Â·partment and ambulabcd dalls, a The NPVS burglary was from buildings and from motor the communications center te- -:solved with the arrest of two vehicles, shoplifting, pocket- port6d dispatching 17,206 calls suspects, :but the other cases picking, purse-snatching, thefts las; yeÂ«Â·an,increase tof 7.4 remained unsolved, he said. a - from coinLoperated machines ~ ~ percent compared with 1997... 1 -Assault cases declined in Â·and other kinds.6flarceny.: BUild 0 Most of the calls~ *were non- 1998, asÂ·police handled 45 such ~ With a total of $235,688 criminalin hature, 3 ; 12: ..:' 2~4 'whes, a 13.5 percent decrease worth of item~ reported stolen fOr Ef i The Police Depaftmint was , compared with the 52 assaults . last year, police were able to unable to generate a;report of Â·reported in 1997. , recover $71,936 worth, or 30 still a how many ofthe 1998 calls - Police were able to solve 76 Pe~~.97, policJ handled cases By TIM A i were hon-criminal, but Â·in the percent of the assault cases re- , j two.l#rior years'the ratio of ported. of $148,910 in stolen property, Devel, with a recovery rate of 9 per- criminal to non-criminal cases; Burglary alsoÂ·decreased by ~ plans ar was about 6 percent to 94 per- 15.4 fercdnt, falling from 53 to cent. . Accordidg to EPPD records ~fh~i~e~ cent. , 45 cases last year. Serious crimes were rare, * Filsinker attributed the de, supervisor Felice Thorson- der the i but a ffw were reported by the crease in burglaries to good Boudreaux, $83,176 in cur- consider, ' Polic,; Departi#ejnl~% r,piÂ·ct.4-' #243fnirts,bi: tiatrol ofliber'12'Nholl' rerd.Qi,;was.stolengin the,Com- Planning ?DiÂ¥Â»66*t Public Sate~â‚¬*t~tÂ«~bl~id*hitâ‚¬1628W6;~~thll*f*29fh $39 of Revie, Randyl**oli,and Deputy Pof >birila,51 ~ro*res#lait yearl *tj)!M*50*q'*Qi ?~'229:$~1 o velopmei lice),Cvief,:Gregg Filsingir.: . Pollce,~brd able U solvdjust#*@*j[#0~~~QJ#~~i*r,~~len~ 4 fourthoi ty:Ntablti~tyntiÂ°:I ':pr~nt ff, th; 7Â»***Â»%*021:he 1.*i ~ the ritore seri6us offenses. They had:no luÂ¢IE.kliMY:â‚¬7, *466*t~*1idi~iti~indfurs in granted There was one reported kid- the three thefts.of **orpy 9Nx:2 0Â¢*~~*6,1Nit*i*4;690, *pre items n I na*ping last year. . clesireport*d 1*#ty@ar,,.4*Â·'-191$14 Â£,1 -3'NY'x~ MeÂ·;j;14- ~the #eh 7*wl . t&~~.nhZel~ >Polide.were unable to clear Th6 comb*06&4Â¥'aldilfiE,inreponfqJKuring â€¢ r Â·5 4% 4â€žj,~di$334 4604fe*Â· fif .~r-4~ plali'lh8 tlie,dade of a woman who re- three#velucled.wal!*53,0Â® . Aried she was kidnapped and In contrait,'931*6Â¥lt *41*(31?/*1<9**aplile'.. rep.048 of for tlie 06*wally assaulted, Filsinger live cases of,inot* Vehidtil,64â‚¬01,9iotrod. 4/. s~164.111*.les wit},in u ~ in 1997 and recdyered all tive,L and recovered $800 word*t Indaddition to that sexual stolen vehicles..jÂ·-2 5., . 7(. 09: . - 00Â£6*:itam, stole#:fiÂ·o: sai~.#~ assault case, police handled Police rd#ortid dikht cadesIdf, , Este#-3?frk,redlderits andikisi- new-sul tors :during the year included ninekther sexual offense cases Â·counterfeiting l#st year, when allowab lait j'6*r, t*0: of which proved a rash of bogus $20 bills were $5,485 :iworthÂ·of computers, $9,17*Worth:of televisions, ra- percent td be' ,jinfoUnded. i '.-'. passed iII Estesl'ark. ~Â·,: Aios,Â·;,tdreos and videocassette tude is $ The *emaining seven #11 ih: Filsinger said the officers i. u ., , existing volved juvenile perpetraidlrs, *~solved one of the -bases, the but . recorders,Â·.and 2$4,609 *6*th of Deve Filsinger said. ~ - others remain under inirestit redord,16Â¢s, with recbvery of density Police handled six sexual of- gation. , 'â€¢See'POLICE: Page 2 reasons 71 e 254-5 *AL--17&-i- {Gne:#~ Aink 3 ER 199 7 73- l 0.4 'f - , 'Additibbilly,Â·the toWnhas' erated from and used here," turn to the public with answers c6mpany, ] -râ€¢ set- up a batk-lip disiatch"syd- -Repola *said.7 . r - - ( at a future YZK meeting. Center and tem at th6 fire station, and any Estes Park has two electric Jim Butterfield, Bureau of districts. Police :catalog crime statistics....... Der (Continued from Page 1) year before. monses and warnings issued (Continue The department handled 55 decreased. $290 worth of computers, $25 drug-related arrests last year, . Officers issued 118 traffic shifts den worth of televisions or stereo compared with 26 in 1997. summons last year, 53 percent which de, equipment and $896 worth of - Marijuana possession fewer than in 1997, an 260 erential recordings. .- *'', - <,2.-1 charges increased from 9 to 30, Warnings, 54 percent fewer. deemed i , Police also handled reports of cocaine from none to four, hal- Traffic penalty assessments higher (lei thefts of $1,701 worth of house- lucinogens from one to two and did increase, rising 17 percent Howev, hold goods, $606 in consumable amphetamine cases from one to to 302. tended to goods including alcohol and four. Repola said the increase in zoning CC food, $16,001 in general m6r- Filsinger attributed the in- traffic contacts was becalise of once refir chandise, $382 in purses or crease in cases to enhanced ef- the department's efforts to re- resolve w wallets, $13,074 in tools, $1,897 forts on the part of the police to spond to neighborhood con- most susc in vehicle parts and accessories, lind them, rather than because cerns. areas. and $17,150 worth of other ofan upswing in usage. Â«We encouraged them to Techni items, Boudreaux said. Disorderly conduct also fell make more contact.Â» Gamble n, Alcohol, drugs and more ~ Â· sharply, from 30 cases in 1997 Tickets are issued at the of- ventory sh * .. . .. Â· g . . . Â·~ to 15 reported in 1998. - 0. , ; ficer'a discUtion, so an increase acres or Liquor'offenses'decreased ; ; There was just a 3 percent incontacts would not necessar- _planning E last year, while cases of driving increase in motor vehicle acci- ily result in an increase in tick- are unimp under,the influence ofalcohol dents reported in 1998, with ets, he added. were up. Â·'I i :f .. f \ 1:.( 468 .accidents, 15 more than f - Warraht arrests increased Limited et The'EPPD >reported 26 .theyear before. v '12 9.. 'dl4.5 Detcent, with 126 rAported Town A liquor law violations last year, Traffic stops. increased 18 last year. i said the pl compared with 74 in 1997. percent last year, rising from - :Aninial control cases rose 21 around There were 54 DUI arrests 1,856 to 2,195. percent, with 487 reported in parcels, fe last year, compared with 44 the But the number of sum- 1998. r . to opt for affordabl bonuses. , 1 ~ He said mateÂ» ma 1,000 peop allowances A re n. ~ Town T said the worthwhile f Terence K. Licence .................................................Publisher ~ Â© 1999 Estes Park Trail-Gaz,tte; Estes Park, Colorado Tim Asbury.................................................â€ž...Managing Editor ' litp:/Anvvi.â€¢ptrall.com J i Jackie Hutchins ............................4......................... News Editor Travis Behning ...........â€ž..9..................:.................. Sports Edlbr Thl EsÂ¢-Park Tral;Gazette, (USPS 604820) .ucce,dbg thi Est- Park Barb Boyer..............................,...,..,.,,,..."..,...... Feature Edibr Trail and thi Mountâ€¢)1 Gazine, 11 pubn,h,d evory Widnesday and Frldq at Heather B,uckner.,.................,......................Community Edilor . Â·$41 p,r year IlifiN In Colorado Ind $40 per year Dul,Id~ of Colorado by a subscrlpOon rate of $30 pir year In Larirner, Boulder and Wild Counties Elizabeth Rogers,........................Display Advertising Manager Est# P-k Trail-Gazitti, P.O. Box 1707, EK- Park Colo. 80517. Offices Jeannie Logemann.......,...............Adverising RepresentaOve wi located at 251 Moralne Avi. Etes Park, Colo. Tolophori (970) 686- Amy Logan ...............1.................3.Adverlising Representalive , Â· 3366, fax (970) 586-9532, Wob IHI: httpl/www.optrall.corn, 0-mall: Dennis Book......:.................Producion and Systems Manager edito,Ooptrd.corn. Porlodlcal post~ge paid at E-: Park, Colo.. 80517. Jesse Speer ........................................................Composlion Â·, POSTMASTER: Sind addres; chang- to The Est- Park Trall-GazeÂ¢t< Sue Darby ..............................................................Circulation P.O. Box 1707, EK- Park, Colo.,00517. Carol Piuman ............................................ Mail and Dist,ibution . Benjamin Leach ..................................................Press Liaison. 1998 Colorado Prou Dan Whitson.........................................Skigle Copy Distribubr A.oclatlon Aiardb: Santly Licence.............._,.,,.......__......â€žBusiness Manager Best :porti story (2) Best deadline nows reporting Public Ier,Ice Best *pectal lectlon Best feature photo .W...1&].1 Beht Informedlonal graphic < Errorm Pollclei: Thi Trall-Gaz,tto will asourne no obllgation (other than can- Best black-and-white ad cellation of chargn for thi actual space occupied) for accldental Irror, In Best use of color In an ad advertisern,nts, but *Ill bi happy toluml,h a â€¢Ignid litter to thi buying pub- Best advertising campaign (2) lic. The nevapiper Wil cormel factual irrors h b ne. columns of add clarNI- catlon 0 points riquifing corriction or claflfication are reported to the manag- Â· Best newspaper promotion (2) Ing edltor. Advertising excellence Ct-. Pollcy: Opin forum comnrunications wil be accepted when signed by 1997 National Nowspaper 1 thi writ.. 'Innlted to a r-lonable :lze and not libelous or In bad We, Al lot- 1 torâ€¢ for publlcation mult be *Ignod. The Tral-Guette -erves the ilght to odlt Asioclation Awards: any andfal news copy, Including litters to the edmor. Best use of photos COLORADO Sticâ€¢poon Ra-: . Best photo essay In Larn=r, Boulder and Weld Counties...........................u..........$30 pif yiar Best *pedal 18*ui PRESS Els.her. A cair..An - 1 rer ..r Best coverage 01 the perfofming arts Outsk Of C.6-48 .0 pery.ar Best lettef to the editor ' ASSOCIATION .. 75 e- E*140 Ac k Tra,fl Go-zdf~EL- J(A,A. 2-1- 7 Police train more thA 4,000 . hours; satisfaction excels Customer survey motor vehicle and assisted them in resolving accident their problems. investigation, Asked how they rated their , shows favorable evidence col- contacts overall, the respon- .0 . attitude to officers lection, de- dents' answers averaged 4.55 signing police on the scale of 5. By JACKIE HUTCHINS b u i 1 d - Public Safety Filsinger said the depart- 4.14 ings,car- ment received some comments The time spent in training of diopulmonary resuscitation, giving the officers high marks 2 two new police officers in 1998 emergency, special operations for professionalism and cour- 2 6 . k. helped boost the Estes Park and SWAT team training, risk tesy, but adding, "Boy, I wish Police Department's total time management, physical agility, he hadn't given me that ticket." spent in training to 4,273 hours customer service, constitution- The EPPD also surveyed 36 last year. al law and the Spanish lan- people who had contact with Deputy Police Chief Gregg guage. the communications depart- Filsinger said 2,000 hours of Filsinger told the Public ment during the year. :*: 2%%':t#- I training is common for a de- Safety Committee on Jan. 7 Their answers ranged from partment the size of EPPD. that he hopes to train two acl- 4.24 to 4.44 on a scale of 5 to In 1997, EPPD officers ditional officers as bicycle offi- the same questions as were logged 2,359 hours in training. cers in the coming year, to join asked about the patrol officers. In 1998, the basic training of the two officers already trained Assistant Town Administra- the new officers added 1,600 to to patrol on bicycle. tor Randy Repola said the Even the tally, but even without the Bike officers have a greater EPPD will look at expanding 0 new officer training, the ability to get around downtown the survey in 1999. department was over the aver- during the summer tourist sea- Some Police Departments .-Em age. son traffic congestion, and are may survey every fourth per- Training classes taken by a more visible presence than son they have contacted, individual officers last year officers in squad cars, he noted. regardless of whether the per- ranged from community-ori- Filsinger also reported that son was a victim, witness or ented policing (280 hours) and the department, in its first year criminal, he noted. erages, p quality improvement (256 of doing customer service sur- Repola added that the de- hours) to firearms training (182 veys, scored answers ranging partment has had the most re- stenannec hours) and high-speed driving from 4.38 to 4.68 on a scale of 5 sponses when directly calling (152 hours). during the surveys done in the people with survey questions, your inst Officers put-94 hours into fourth quarter of theyear. but people may feel more com- Automol policy and procedures, 88 into The EPPD contacted 57 peo- fortable when answering 0 supervision and management, ple who had contact with patrol anonymously. represent 77 into defensive driving, 72 officers in the last quarter. Filsinger said the EPPD has into interview and interroga- They were asked if the em- gotten praise for even asking tion training, 51 into arrest ployee behaved in a profes- about job performance. .. control and 50 into computer sional manner, was helpful, Â«People love the contact," he i training. was knowledgeable, showed said. :'They love the follow-up .1 Officers also took classes in concern for their situations, ofbeing asked." . Police Log - Monday, Jan. 18 * The Police Department dispatched 61 calls. 'Estes Park Police and the Larimer County Sherifrs Department made 10 traf- j i fic stops. Officers handled 5 cases of suspicious cixtumstances, 1 juvenile problem, WIND I l animal problem, 5 citizen assists and 6 exterior, bar or business checks. ~~ ~ Window The Police Department dispatched 5 ambulance calls and 1 Estes Park Volun- 0 teer Fire Department call. 0 Incidents ofnote included: ' 7:10 a.m.-Motor vehicle accident with property damage, 600 MacGregor Ave. 9,17;72 and F Onicer Life. ,: 4:23 p.m.-Motor vehicle accident with injury, 2100 block of Devil's Gulch 232>, n... Road. Trooper Fritts (CSP) with aSSiftnnee from n.- .4.. e..1,2.-_ - ,Â¥ - r.- I - '14 , -;J 4 - 4.' '7 . - . 4, 'e=r-]nrenue and'Highway 7 trom Comanche to 2 -0@. DrivingUn~ *: extra Mmeln ~he school.area to'ensure that Morgan Stre#t EPPD: Estes Park . ~ 3all traffic laws are observed. u f Violations reported on the streets have 1 . EPMED: Estes Pat Detween 7:30 and. 8 4a.m.; and again . EPVFD: Estes Par] included speeding and failure to yield to LCSD: Larimer Coi bet*Aed 8 'and 8:45,p.m.; drivers must slow 46 20 *tph in the school zones, Rose said. pedestrians using designated crosswalks, Â«At these times there is a substantial Rose added. amount of vehicle traffic and school-age chil- Â«We've had some near misses out there,Â» dren using the streets, side*alks and cross. Chiefof Public Safety Randy Repola said. Local mai Walks," he noted. Â«We're going to be pretty aggressive in the 't Police arrest iÂ«As; the potential for accidents is school zones from now on.Â» Park man Wedn 3, on a charge th; 4--r*-42 9.201,1 Gaze*kk- EsÂ·ks 11-rk /1Uak \0+4, /999 7Â§ 13 tried to choke h POIi (6~raid. nn - son. QPC- Cpi. Robert Sc 6 -1- r --_#...Â·Â·,Mark-Hargis,46 of assaulting Ne , Ill . on Proffitt's neck natt ~ him during an ari v, ~, 14[<sharpdr drug focus ' <fitt, 18,Â·by putti Schumakertsai 2By JAbKIE HUTCHINS. . n v Larimer ~ounty Dis6ict Court Between the undercover marks on the ma, ' f KL >Â·4228 k#*63 ; . . . on March 22: F , - : cases and the metham- 51. ThbJEstaipak Police~De- The methamphetamine case phetamine case, local police - partni4ht'.tobk;*n estihi'ated was solved simply through or- have arrested 14 people on EP womar 4, .â€¢ f ?$8i750 *worthoof.metham- dinary police work. e drug charges in recedt months., 1 . phetamines off.the street in :, 4 But the EPPD also has been Deputy Police Chief Gregg An Estes Par} 21_ Â· late. Jaiduary, RfUr tlid'suspi- ~ focusing on drug investigations Filsinger said :the Special En- ceived minor inju -. cions were aroused fpllowing a through its five-month-old Spe- forcement United was formed a motor vehicle routine traffic stop. cial Enforcement Unit. last fall to identify people who Acacia Drive an 01 '- . The?traffic Btop lea omcers The unit has seized about deal drugs and to hold them View Court on 1 toÂ·*iÂ¢*rea motel, the Aspen $7,600 from accused drug deal- accountable for their illegal March 6. Â·g. 2 Winds, where they found a gus-- ers after its -undercover inves- acts. ~ ~ tOmcer Ryan . 114 Pected ihAhimihetamine lab i tigations. 7 9 won't say it's a new effort, Edna Wiest, 32, E 41 ' bid been set up; add six Fort , That money could eventu- but it's a focused effort more of incapacitating inil 3 Collins residents were ar- :ally be released back to the . an organized effortÂ» he said. rested.; . - EPPD, where it could be used ' Six officers are participating Detective * Mike van- for trkining or equipment for in the unit as an extra duty as- Thief load: Deutekom said,the Colorado officers, or could be put in the signment, he said. Bureau of Investigation has department's fund to buy drugs The unit works closely with Estes Park poli, sinceconfirmed that a sub- as part ofits investigations. the Larimer County Drug Task tigating the theft o ~ - stance'thdy,sei,ed following It has conducted seven un- Force. of glassware from i the arrests .was:alittle 'more dercover operations in all, re- Filsinger said the unit has Sgt. Gary Fox : than 70 -gr,nist. of ihetham- i ABulting in the arrbsbof eight had tremendous success so far, Seybold feported , phetamines, with an estimated J.people and -an outstanding -ar- and he anticipates the unit's Fenton glassware .street valâ‚¬6 of $8,750. Â£ 1, rest warrant for a dinth, be- investigations will continue. from Herzog's Gif The drug case is set for pre- lieved.to have fled the state, Â«A program that is that suc- Saturday, Marcit 6. hminary hearing t in the vanDeutekom said. , cessful, you enhance it.Â» 14+ e 1 Town officials designate ~ He said there 1 pects or leads. Cpl. Corey Pass tating the theft of Sunday, March 7. Y2K information centers Public / . <Ele**hifacilities have been Filsinger noted. The Town of Estes Park also Wednesday ME .iddhtifiediasi:community in- He said heis continuing to is preparing to inform the pub- School Board 3:30 p.n i formation points where police seek other facilities that could lic about Y2K issues through a confer sessions to ciscuss will post current information join fhe list to serve as emer- Year 2000 readiness update School Board 5:30 p.n ' during times of emergency. gency information centers and scheduled Thursday, April 8, don to discuss policy govel The centers are part of the potentially take in neighbors if from 7 to 8:30 p.m. in the town's effort to prepare for dis- they needed shelter. Municipal Building. Thursday, Marc asters such as power outages, The facilities also could po- The session will feature rep- floods, fires or any problems tentially be staffed with ham reseritatives from the Light Ught and Power Comn that may occur Jan. 1, when radio operators. and Power Departmen$, Platte Tuesday, March the calendar changes to the Filsinger said Larimer Coun- River Power Authority and ~ year 2000. ty has a team of around 20 ham Western Area Power Adminis- Eâ€¢tee Park Planning O Est- Valley Recrnatio Deputy Police Chief Gregg operators available in the Estes tration. erica room. Fils#lger said the centers now Park area for emergencies. The mâ€¢â€¢Aner .â€¢.11 1. L... - J -- :4=40 mr:lei Page 18 The Trail-Gazette, Friday, Feb. 26,1999 2 -0,iest@ . Drug raids yield 5 arrests .cw â€¢FULL SERN Estes Park police arrested for conspiracy to commit dis- Roth participated in the three â€¢ High-Si five area residents on drug tribution of marijuana, a Class raids over the weekend. . Design charges in recent days. 5 felony offense. Oh Tuesday, Feb. 23, the â€¢ Carboi The Police Department con- A third arrest occurred at EPPD Sdlective Enforcement â€¢ Booklets â€¢ ducted raids - after obtaining about 8:30 p.m. on Saturday, Unit, working in cooperation 586-0526 search warrants and, arrest Feb. 20, at 381 S. St. Vrain, with the Larimer County.Sher- warrants based on ongoing in- Unit 4, where officers arrested iffs Department, took two vestigations - on two homes James Guy Wilson, 52, on a other area residents into cus- and arrested three area men warrant for distribution of tody on arrest warrants out of on drug charges over the week- marijuana, a Class 4 felony. ' Larimer County District Court, end, according to Detective The detective said a search also based on an ongoing un- Help is Mike vanDeutekom. , , of the home resulted in the dercover investigation. The first arrest was made on seizure of three-'quarters of a Officers arrested Peter flngi i Friday, Feb. '19, at about 10 pound of marijuana and nu- Joseph Mikolitch, 48, and his ; :1~101Â°N~%~kitr=: 'CW;0~:trolled substances , wife,Janet Lynn Mikolitch, 39, Call our lite of 7230 Highway 7, south of It's toll-tree Unit 9, where officers arrested Wilson is being charged with Estes Park, on charges of dis- OF HOPE .... THE VOICE ,.... Efren Christopher Camberos, four Class 4 Monies, one Class tribution of marijuana, a Class 1-800-572-171 18, on a charge of conspiracy to 5 felony and one Class 1 misde- 4 felony, and conspiracy to . .commit distribution of mari, meanor, including possession commit distribution, a Class 5 juana, a Class 5 felony. of Hydrocodone, Codeine, felony. Propoxyphene and Alprazolam. A search warrant was is- The detective said a search He also is being charged sued, and officers digcov6red a of that home resulted in a with one count of possession of small amount of marijuana El=i small amount of marijuana be- more thah eight ounces of mar- and drug paraphernklia. ing seized, along with assorted ijuana, also a felony. A family vehicle was seized Â· drug paraphernalia. Officers seized more than as evidence in the case. ,. A second arrest occurred at $1,400 in cash from the resi- In addition to vanDeutekom, about midnight that night at dence. Rose, Brand, Alberts and Roth, 432 Chiquita Lane, where offi- In addition to vanDeutekom, LCSD Deputy Tim Sullivan cers arrested Benjamin War- Officers Eric Rose, Darren . participated in the Tuesday ~ ren Campbell, 25, on a warrant Brand, Ryan All)erts and Scott raid. 9Â¢#EjÂ¢R 3 Police Log BARGAIN-RATE CAR INSURANCE PAR Monday, Feb. 22 WITH BARGAIN- i.dift... The Police,Repartment dispatched 24 calls. Estes Partk'olice and the I.arimer County Sheriffs Department made 1 traffic RATE SERVICE IS -- stop. Officers*handled 2 cases Of suspicious circum,tancet 5 citizen assists and 4 NO BARGAIN. bar or welfamchecks. The Police Department dispatched no ambulance or fire calls. 1 Incidents ofnote included: 2:40 a.m-Criminal mischief, 211 Cleave St. Officer Alberta. At .E 9:21 a.m-Family problem, 640 MacGregor Ave. Officer Peck. .../.'ll.-I......I--I. NOTR 2:45 p.m.-Motor vehicle accident with property damage, West Riverside Drive. Officer Peck. i 4:26 p.m-Motor vehicle accident with property damage, Wiest parking lot. Omcer Peck. ' 360 E. 6:47 p.m,-Physical disturbance, 1631 Avalon Drive. Cpl. Schumaker and Vic- 54Â· Don't trust Â· tim Advocate. .2 -lust anyone to - -, i * insure your car, Tuesday, Feb. 23 9 IM see me: The Police Department dispatched 33 calls. <1.- k ' Estes Park Police and the Larimer Counly Sheriffâ€¢ Department made 5 traffic stops. Officers. handled 1 cue of suspicious ciMumstances; 8 citizen assists and 9 JeffHancock exterior orbarchecks. 501 St Vrain Lane The Police Department dispatched 3 ambulance calls. St Vrain CenterÂ·586-9547 Incidents ofnote included: Fri 9:34 p.m-DUI, Highway 7 at Lexington Lane. Officer Roth. < STATI IARSI ~ Like a uu.Anne,40v Mah 94 . ..-.le . --a --:â€ž1,An.Â·Â· .._ .., .w-- Page 12 The Trail-Gazette, Wednesday, March 3. 1999 - Committee backs economy -- policy for police vehicles A 4.3 0 Town to replace vehicles,Â» ril-1 Mahany said the Jeeps have r,id 94:(0~ Assistant Li~ C not been in service long enough 49..1.4 2 patrol cars Town Admin- m \ to determine the cost at 90,000 .9354 3 istrator M-1 miles. . ; '0*147 with Ford models Randy Repola ~ The town's replacement poli- $ P'Â·4 The police Public Safety ~stob~~lncewsehderson~the~~ 4.44Â·~ By JACKIE HUTCHINS Â· - noted officers have vehicles reach 90,000 to ? RI>Pik Estes Park police put about been happy with the Ford and 100,000 miles. 2.-tes 20,000 miles a year on each of Chevrolet sedans and the Now vehicles eyed the department's six marked Jeeps, he said. The Police Department will I patrol vehicles. A four-wheel-drive fleet? - Fleet manager Dave Ma- be getting two n6w vehicles in -.p hany said the current Police Â· Repola said there are times mid-1999. Department fleet - four of the year when it might be The Public Safety Commit- ~ marked sedans, two marked nice to have more four-wheel- tee recommended the town ~ Jeeps, two unmarked cars and drive vehicles in the EsteR board approve the low bids a truck used by the humane of- Park fleet, but Mahany's recent from Rains Motor Company, to II~M ficers - appears to be an effi. cost-analysis of the money pilrcha,e two new Ford Crown ~ cient size to handle the de. spent on the two Jeeps in the Victorias to replace a 1994 ~ partmenes needs. . fleet compared with the five Chevrolet Caprice and a 1996 He told th6 Public Safety Fords and on, Chevrolet, indi- Crown' Victoria, both of which i Committee the'Estes Park 40- cated the traditional sedans will have hit between 80,000 Eal lice fleet is similar in size to are more economical. and 90,000 miles by mid-year. the fleets in two other moun- The current six-vehicle fleet Rains bid $22,059 per vehi- , Trac tain communities with similar costs the town $27,016 a year, cle, less a $6,800 trade-in al- Keal year-round and' seasonal popu- Mahan,gaid. lowance for the 1996 car and a dum lations - Aspen and Brecken- A fleet of five Jeeps wuuld $5,000 trade-in allowance for trucl , 4 ridge. cost $30,945 to $36,750, de- the 1994. .-' Aspen has seven mark6d pending on how long they were Other bidders offered lower , vehicles and two unmarked kept in service, he advised. .prices, $20,526 and $21,704, vehicles, all Saabs, and a hu- Mahany said it costs 17Â¢ per but one offered much lower mane officer pickup. , mile to run the sedans until trade-in allowances and the Toi It keeps the humane truck they reach 40,000 miles on the other refused to take any on duty for four years and the odometer. trade-ins. other vehicles a maximum of From 40,000 to 70,000 miles, Mahany said the local deal- two years. the cost is 20Â¢ per mile, from ership offers better trade-in al- CO Breckenridge's fleet - all 70,000 to 90,000 the cost esca- lowances becauge it knows how four-by-four Land Rovers _ lates to 36Â¢ per mile, and over the town maintains the vehi- By JACKII has eight marked and two un- 90,000 miles it goes to 41Â¢ per cles. mark6d vehicles, all of which mile. Repola said police equip- The he are replaced after being on The cost to run the Jeeps is ment, such as radios and light seven-yea duty for three years. higher, Mahany said. bars, as well as decals and ference ~ Estes Park has no plans to Under 40,000 miles, they other markings to identify the worked w, j , ~ change from its traditional cost 26Â¢ per mile, from 40,000 patrol vehicles, will add to tlie Now th Ford-based fleet to 60,000 they cost 29Â¢ and. costs. asked to : "rraditionally in Estes Park over 60,000 miles, the cost is Mahany said the vehicles to fix the : we have driven American-made 41Â¢ per mile. may arrive in town in July. Confer, ing Direc told the ( ment Coi EPHS group to review graduation plans Feb. 25, , placemen. The Estes Park High School will remain the site for the volunteers are welcome at the exchange Accountability Committee will 1999 graduation ceremony on school to tutor, help in the li- er-hot wz i meet Thursday, March 4, to May 30. brary or copy room, grade pa- recommei review the potential for making The committee also will talk pers, assist in special education has been 1 changes-in.-graduation.andio-about.a-proposal-for_a_ticket_and_alternative education 9isyst?r . v,v. ....6 1-4 JAAâ€¢-,UG,/6/ 6/ad .......G ..4.06UAAOO WGic OUUCU 61 C,tout C.. were formerly classified under in 1998, covering nine Â«odor in- The only change' in the offil a miscellaneous Â«other" catego- vestigations" for gas leaks, re- cer slate is the elevation of Ray 01 ry. quiring 74 hours, and four Parker as first assistant chief, â€¢C Last year was a favorable "cooking or heating equipment replacing Ed Ford. 1 7-ke- 6-502,5 7*rk. 11-2/ 64:ze#-e-- Ja-v~. 27. /999 23 3 Police uncover speed lab, - arrest 6 on drug charges R..4 1 0,Â·; 041 . ?'-4/Â°. 4*61 15.... 09;.1,10,1 9 A routine traffic stop late substance, a Felony 5 charge, Christina Waunch, 29, is be- ~t: 4 :40 Â»14,~ Monday night resulted in the and driving while license sus- ing charged with unlawful use g p, 9 f arrests of six Fort Collins resi- pended and no proof of insur- of a Schedule II controlled sub- t' "Â· -'~ - .Â·9 i. '83 , dents under suspicion of pro- ance, minor traffic charges, stance and unlawful manufac- F t.' :Â¢iohaR~ ducing methamphetamines. against the elder Lundin. turing of a Schedule II con- </' 2 + ..It... Uititspr62 Deputy Police Chief Gregg His son is being charged trolled substance. rt.a, ~..14 :f';~p Filsinger said Officer Scott with unlawful possession of a All six people were trans- i Â·Cr i, Â·. , ,~i Roth contacted Ricky Lundin, Schedule II controlled sub- ported to the Larimer County b. :,2 1 * '4= v ' =1 42, at about 11:05 p.m. at the stance, a Felony 4 charge, as Detention Center in Fort C , ' N .:Allbrly@ intersection of West Elkhorn well as possession of less than Collins on Tuesday. i Avenue and Wonderview Av- one ounce of marijuana and #ilsinger said the suspects i:. Â·0â€ž 4 enue, after seeing the man possession of drug parapher- indicated the substance found ( .3 ..45eo;rate drive over the center line. nalia, both petty offenses. was methamphetamines, and 4...., ...t;Â· 20 4..31% , He took Lundin into custody t#0 - ipining ro Andrew Lloyd, 25, is being the Colorado Bureau of Inves- 1 n. 1% . #, suspended drivers' license and Schedule II controlled sub- test the substance. after finding the mail had a charged with unlawful use of a tigation is being called upon to 44' .14 dchf;rer ' no proof of insurance. stance. He said the quantity of sub- fk';iÂ·~ *Ary ,; cic- 11.94151%li;*c , During an inventory search Charles LeBlanc, 30, is be- stance found was not substan- 04'11?â€¢ 'Restorati, of the man's vehicle, officers ing charged with unlawful Ual. 04-2.33 #51318156*24-261 found several items of drug manufacturing of a Schedule II Officers who investigated 9390~*3...96:4 3- 0 4 paraphernalia, and arrested a controlled substance, Felony 3. the case included Roth, Officer 04:/t.4 830â€ž passenger in the vehicle, Lund- Jill Stoffels, 18, is being Ryan Alberts, Cpl. Corey Pass, :1}. v -Â» . I.,r in's son, Michael Lundin, 18, charged with unlawkl use of a Detective Mike vanDeutekom, f;?*;4'" t.1,1.564(iÂ© Filsinger said. Officers then obtained a Schedule II controlled sub- Deputy Tim Sullivan of the 6Â£1396 ,?F-*406 stance and unlawful manufac- Larimer County Sheriffs De- ,*44- 14., t.'Â» ,,.,0.,Pr search warrant for a rented turing of a Schedule II con- partment, and members of the 3*68*. 1/5200.4,43.- ~ room in a lodge on the west trolled substance. Larimer County Task Force. ~%4*~;,t#L12#4.12.6,*1'.44 side iof town, and discovered f*7*7**et~JR*04 what they believed to be a ar,<waitrr clandestine drug operation, in- cluding manufacturing equip- Â¢ p WoRRerM Bre,d<~tr.,Â·Â· iei*liza.riffi ment and chemicals, which of- 33;le:Â·2 157. :.f.i,,, <2;-(~9,*TTwo Eggs, Grits or Hashbrowns, -1*74* A-Mi, :Â£.3~. ficers seized. I They arrested four more Toast and Coffee ... adults during the investiga- 1 rh tion. $279 *WS*...6331 Filsinger said the charges -4 21:10 44. if Â·.' Ph: >; 1 : 1.4.Rt the department plans to file tiir j *P â‚¬41-f:#r .:Â¢44, include charges of unlawful ;*04 6 /p.:qggfUW Conversations with #lends ... 1=6 â€ž ,&* Â·-;"~6:Â·i .'.,0 use of a Schedule II controlled -9 Â·Â·Â·Â·.aÂ·,2': ryÂ·AL,Â·, PRICELESS ~~4*4.,ty.'14 . 1~42 0 0-1,0,1 M '*r .. "4 4 ed' ..6 '1.%,M. L ,:~a . *-4 â€¢'Â·:â€¢4; N-A/'44 - . 1 Tell the T-G 451(3*HORN TO ANNOUNCE your wed- -- RESTAURANT. INC. -tru ding in the Trail-Gazette stop ' ' % 4, 1 9,4 by ihe T-G office at' 251 A GATHERING PLACE... 1 .' i 4 5 4 & ' 4 4 . 9 2 I Moraine Ave. and pick up a 401 WEST ELKHORN Â· 586-2792 6*rk: 4*;.A *494#FL wedding information form. L 4 ' r. . Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, June 8,1999 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 8th day of June, 1999. Meeting called to order by Mayor Robert L. Dekker. Present: Robert L. Dekker, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker John Baudek Stephen Gillette George J. Hix Lori Jeffrey Also Present: Randy Repola, Assistant Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: None Mayor Dekker called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: On behalf of the Mayor and Board of Trustees, Trustee Baudek congratulated the Eagle Rock School in being recognized as a National Service-Learning Leader School. The recognition was awarded by a new presidential initiative and the recognition was awarded to only 70 schools nationwide. Service-learning combines academics with community service in a way that benefits students, teaches civic responsibility and strengthens communities. As part of its award, Eagle Rock was asked to lead other schools in starting or improving their service-learning programs. Through service- learning, students apply their coursework to community issues in relevant and meaningful ways, ie: building a handicapped-accessible pier at Lake Estes, remodeling the Salud Clinic, helping with construction of the MacGregor Ranch Nature Museum, building a new deck for the Visitor Information Center, helping with renovation work at Rocky Ridge Music Center, and performing numerous tasks in support of the Estes Valley Youth Center. Eagle Rock also assists with set-up for the Scottish-Irish Festival, marshals for the Catch the Glow Christmas Parade, trail construction for the National Forest Service and Rocky Mountain National Park. The Board expressed their appreciation to Eagle Rock for being such fine community-oriented neighbors. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated May 25, 1999. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Community Development, May 27, 1999 - Approval of: 1. Special Events a. Amendment to Policy Manual re: Banner Regulations and Specifications. B. Public Safety, June 3,1999. Board of Trustees - June 8, 1999 - Page 2 4. Planning Commission, May 18, 1999 (acknowledgement only). 5. Recommendation for Re-appointment of Trustee Hix to the Larimer County Open Lands Advisory Board, 3-yr. term, expires June 30,2002. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Jeffrey) the Consent . Calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. Mayor Dekker introduced/welcomed Wil Smith, Executive Director/EPURA who began his employment June lst. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Rocky Mountain National Park Report. RMNP Supt. Randy Jones presented a report on the Park's 1999 major construction projects to be completed. The construction, totaling approximately $5 Million, is from Fee Demonstration Program Funds, and these funds will be expended on visitor improvements. The Rock Cut Wall Repair will restrict Trail Ridge Rd. to a single lane for approximately 2201 with traffic control flaggers on duty from 9:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. daily, Monday through Friday. From 6:00 p.m. through 9:00 a.m. nightly, one-lane traffic will be alternated by use of temporary traffic signals. This difficult project is expected to last throughout the summer season. Other construction projects include Rock Cut Restroom Rehab, Alpine Visitor Center Restroom Rehab, and Moraine Park Amphitheater Rehab. Regarding the elk population, the Division of Wildlife is partnering with the Park on a study. The research has been completed, and the next step is the preparation of an environmental impact statement. The Park is seeking significant public involvement, and extended an invitation to the Town Board to join the study group. Mayor Dekker expressed the Board's appreciation for the construction update. 2. Multi-Use Field Design at Fairqrounds - Update. Special Events Director Hinze briefed the Board on this project that was budgeted for 1999 ($110,000). The field is planned in the northeast corner of the fairgrounds. Director Hinze briefed the Trustees on the design process, confirming that the engineer's estimate was $197,000. Staff attempted to reduce costs; however, deductions totaled only $12,000, thus the cost exceeded the budget. Thus, the Community Development Committee recommended postponing the field to Year 2000, with staff seeking GOCO grant funds, and authorizing a budget transfer to year 2000 in anticipation of obtaining said grant funding. Public Works Director Linnane added that the engineer's estimate does not include preliminary design analysis ($4,000), but does include materials that are typically high-priced, i.e.: sod, irrigation, miscellaneous grading, fencing, construction management, and drainage facilities. For moderate use, the sod requires a minimum installation period of approximately 4 weeks. If the project is to proceed at this time, it must be placed on a "fast track" to meet Scottish Festival activities. Funding options, if the project is pursued this year, include utilizing Community Reinvestment Funds and borrowing from the Enterprise Fund. Discussion followed, and it was moved and seconded (Barker/Gillette) the Community Development Committee recommendation be upheld (staff proceed with GOCO funding options, and authorizing a budget transfer to the year 2000 Budget), and it passed unanimously. 3. Special Review Request #99-02/Development Plan, Wildfire Ridge Affordable Housing. Request density amendment to Annexation Agreement, Wildfire Development, LLC/Applicant. Mayor Dekker opened the public hearing, and Town Attorney White clarified the Special Board of Trustees - June 8,1999 - Page 3 Review Process, Section 17.36.030 (f) (1) pertaining to suitability of the proposed location, and subsections a. nearby land uses, b. adequacy of ' roads, etc., and c. environmental characteristics of the site. Senior Planner Joseph presented the Staff Report. Pursuant to an existing Annexation Agreement, the site was previously approved for 44 units. The Applicant is seeking a density bonus of 11 units, for a total increase in density to 61 multi-family dwelling units in nine buildings. Construction of roads and utilities is underway, and upon expiration of an existing lease in June, 2001, the adjacent kennel is proposed to be removed. The density bonus of 11 units is allowed by Special Review provided the proposal's benefits to the Town outweigh any adverse affects for the Town or vicinity based on the criteria found in Section 17.36.030. The Planning Commission recommended conditional approval. A map was displayed that identified the changes being proposed, and this is a concurrent review. Staff confirmed that the density bonus is allowed under Section 17.20.020, and that the Planning Commission conditions for this presentation have been met (conditions 1-6 were read aloud). In addition, staff is recommending }hat the total cost of housing, including monthly fees, not exceed 30% ot total income of individuals buying these units. Staff confirmed that all ten revisions requested by the Planning Commission had been accomplished. One to 3-bedroom units are proposed, and the Applicant is seeking flexibility in the mix of unit types that will be designated affordable. Bill Van Horn, representing the Applicants, confirmed that the existing commercial lot that currently houses the kennel is being absorbed in the Annexation Agreement. This development is not an "all affordable" project; there has been an effort not to over-crowd the site; the site will require extensive grading and landscaping; concerning the "findings for special review", the Town Board already found these in the Annexation Agreement. Drainage: originally a large detention pond was proposed on site; with an easement, drainage will now be placed directly into Dry Gulch, this has eliminated an imposing structure, and this area will become a playground. Traffic volume increase will be mitigated with the removal of the commercial kennel. Building height is under the Code maximum of 30'; all external lighting will be shaded; the unit size ranges between 625 sq. ft. to 1,295 sq. ft.; the warranty deed will restrict affordable units being sold at market rates-an affordable unit shall remain so. Town Attorney White confirmed that he has reviewed the draft deed, and the restriction does indeed provide a 30-yr. iron-clad guarantee that units will not be sold to anyone that does not quality for an affordable unit. In addition, the Town Board may include other conditions in the Amendment, such as ensuring the conceptual drawings become 'as-built" drawings, and restrict nightly rentals. Applicant representative Peter Ingersoll further discussed the affordability issue relative to the area median income, confirming that Larimer County I ownership programs allow up to 38-40% of a family's available income. The Loveland Housing Authority is 30% and up to 38%, on a case-by-case basis. The Applicant has no objection to a percentage rate of 33%. However, should the Town Board desire to establish a maximum monthly dues rate, the Applicant requested an escalator clause. The Applicant is investing in higher-quality building materials to lessen maintenance for approximately 3 years for qualified families. Those speaking in favor: Chris Steadman, supports new units that will not require maintenance prior to occupancy. Board of Trustees - June 8,1999 - Page 4 Those speaking in opposition: Ralph Nicholas who read aloud his letter dated June 2nd, and requested an opportunity for rebuttal should the need arise. In summary, Mr. Nicholas questioned the corporate status of the Applicant, and the valley median family income is considerably lower than county-wide statistics. Mayor Dekker reiterated the Special Review criteria to be used by the Town Board. Jo Ann Richardson, questioned why the additional 11 units are being requested and regarding the kennel lease expiration date of 2001, how many affordable units will be constructed in the immediate future. Mr. Van Horn stated that it is important to this project to financially maintain a ratio of affordable v non-affordable units, however, the ratio will always remain on the pro-affordable side. Additionally, the entire project cannot be entirely designated affordable housing as it is not financially viable. There were no persons speaking in rebuttal, and Mayor Dekker acknowledged receipt of correspondence in opposition to the development submitted by Beverly Briggs. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dekker declared the public hearing closed. Trustee comments included: the status of the kennel issue which is not in the purview of Board; in the affordable housing concept, housing is also needed for teachers, managers, and the like; the viability of whether density bonuses should be granted for affordable housing; and that increased density for this particular site appears to be appropriate. Mayor ProTem Doylen stated the project meets Special Review criteria, there is a need for affordable housing within the community that is becoming further protracted every year, a diversity of stock is needed, thus she moved staff prepare an Amendment to the Annexation Agreement consistent with Special Review Request #99-02 Wildfire Ridge Affordable Housing containing Items 1 through 6 as identified in the Staff Report dated April 8, 1999, plus the following: the total cost of housing, including monthly fees, not exceed 33% of the purchaser's monthly income, the building design be as submitted, the Housing Administrator be accepted by the Developer and the Town, rentals remain affordable,. nightly rentals not be allowed, and the ratio of affordable units be maintained, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Barker, Doylen, Gillette, Hix and Jeffrey. Those voting 'NoÂ», Trustee Baudek. Trustee Barker noted he was discouraged that this request was not included in the original proposal. 4. Special Review Request #99-01, Wildlife Center, Tract 5, Beaver Point, First Addition, International Concept Management/Applicant. Mayor Dekker opened the public hearing, and Senior Planner Joseph presented the Staff Report stating that this concept plan proposal is for a commercial indoor wildlife exhibit and interpretive center. The proposed use would be fully enclosed in a 35,000 sq. ft. building that would also include a restaurant and gift shop. Approximately 265 parking spaces are proposed, with additional space for bus parking. The proposed use is classified as commercial amusement, and, as such, is only allowed by Special Review. Additionally, the size of the proposed building (16,000 sq. ft.) is allowed only by Special Review. The Planning Commission vote, on a motion to deny this proposal, resulted in a tie with one abstention. This request is a Special Review Concept Plan submittal, and as such, the Town Board is to consider the suitability of the proposed use at this location using the criteria in Section 17.36.030. In the event the Town Board approves the Concept Plan, and in order for the application to proceed with the development, the Applicant must then submit a more detailed Development Plan for final Board of Trustees - June 8,1999 - Page 5 Planning Commission approval. The Site Plan should be considered at this time as illustrative of the concept, but potentially subject to minor revisions. The rendered drawing represents the current site plan as proposed. At the Planning Commission public hearing, extensive public comment was received, and Planner Joseph summarized said comments/concerns. The Tramc Study has been completed and it identifies the required access at the developer's expense. As illustrated on the Site Plan, the required traffic improvements would require additional highway right-of-way, and left turn lanes into the site. Specific traffic study questions should be posed to Matt Delich. Planner Joseph summarized that the study indicates an acceptable level of service, and confirmed verbal acceptance by CDOT-written confirmation has not yet been received. Based on the Planning Commission public hearing, the Applicant has made an effort to address public concerns, and the connection for pedestrian improvements on the site fulfill the Code requirement. Town Attorney White reviewed the Special Review criteria, adding that the 5tp: category is not germane to this discussion. Applicant comments: Scott Sullivan, Director of Finance and Principal of International Concept Management (ICM), has been associated with the firm for 11 years. This project is a wildlife interpretive living center, not a petting zoo. 1CM has been involved in similar work for a number of years, and their expertise allows them to build quality exhibits. The proposal is for a living museum where M of the exhibits will be live. Fish and small animals such as porcupine, beaver, muskrat, kit fox, collared lizard and the like will be included; there will not be any hoofed animals. An aggressive marketing campaign is planned; a year-round core group of employees will be maintained; internships and programs are planned with schools; local vendors for construction will be utilized whenever possible; and the Center will be an additional revenue source, attraction and educational resource. The building design is an indicator of the high quality being proposed, and the building has received favorable community response. ICM shares existing traffic concerns and in an effort to mitigate certain traffic congestion, they are proposing accel/decel lanes. Additionally, at a recent Planning Commission meeting, Chairman Sager stated ICM was performing more mitigation than any other developer in the past. Mitigation for noise and odor have been incorporated into the design; the building design has been designed and located so as not to remove trees, terraced parking has been incorporated; landscaping has been designed to lessen the impact; special down lighting for the exterior is planned; the overall design took into consideration the existing natural environment and wildlife habitat. Also, 1CM has obtained a letter of endorsement from the Chamber Resort Association Board. Bill Ziegler, Wildlife Biologist Consultant, reviewed his credentials (25 years experience), and briefed the Trustees on the following: the majority of the animals for this Center will be 'captive born", others will be obtained from ' rehab facilities that are deemed not releasable by the Fish & Game Dept. i and from captive breeding programs. The US Dept. of Agriculture has written health protocol requirements for such Centers, and the CDOW will also be involved in the permitting process. Enrichment programs to improve health, care and other items deemed necessary will be followed; the animals will not be held in restraint, nor will they be paraded on stage. There will not be an odor problem and USDA regulations will be followed. Filtration systems will maintain the aquatic life. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's representative, commented that the roof structure (as depicted on the model), will house the HVAC-there will not be Board of Trustees - June 8, 1999 - Page 6 any mechanical structure outside the building, and the structure will be approximately 180' to the nearest property line. There is a separate parking area for buses, and a separate area for tour buses along the west side of the building. An area northeast of the building is reserved for future development, such as parking. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that if a change in the Concept Plan is anticipated, approval must first be obtained from the Town Board. Concerning diesel fumes from running buses, Mr. Kochevar stated that tour buses will drop-off their passengers then park in the west side parking lot; ICM could ask that the busses shut down. Regarding drainage, although Town criteria allows drainage to fiow directly into the river, the applicant will maintain drainage control along the boundary of the river, storing surface drainage off the parking/grass area. A filtration system is planned along the south side of the site, and it will be installed during construction as ICM has extensive experience in this area. Mr. Sullivan responded to a question on hours of operation by stating that ultimately, the hours will be determined on demand. ICM anticipates opening at 9-10:00 a.m., and closing at 6-8:00 p.m. Matt Delich, P.E. reviewed his Traffic Impact Study, noting his 30 years' experience in traffic engineering. He reviewed the scope of the study with Town staff, Paul Kochevar, and CDOT prior to starting and the scope was agreed upon by all parties. Originally, the CDOT traffic data listed a 1% growth factor on Hwy. 36; however, due to additional statistics provided by CDOT, the study now reflects a 3% growth rate. Discussion followed on the methodology, with Mr. Delich confirming that the analysis found that the exits from the site operate on an acceptable level. Delays should not occur within the turn lane, and stacking will occur within the parking lot itself. Mr. Delich confirmed that the acel/decel lanes will not alleviate existing traffic congestion on Hwy. 36 Public testimony was heard from: Chris Hazelton, a previous dolphin trainer and rehabilitator, who stated the Center was well-suited to the area. Kiley Hazelton, school student, loves animals and likes to learn more about them and nature. Guests will enjoy their experience, and its a great place for field trips. Urged support. David Habecker: Estes Park is a tourist Town, always has been, and always will be, our economic base is tourism, and every resident is a custodian of that economic base. This is a quality project that will do nothing but enhance the tourism base. Any problems that may be associated with the site are minimal when compared with economic base, any benefit outweighs problems. Urged approval. Merideth Sloan, adjacent property owner whose family has been a resident since 1930, loves open space and wildlife. However, it is unrealistic that open space will remain so. Thus, as an adjacent property owner, if she has to look at a commercial site, the proposed building is beautiful. Trees will be allowed to survive, the parking lot is landscaped, and regarding the economic benefit, there is nothing better to educate kids and adults than wildlife. Her spouse is a veterinarian who donates his time in a zoo for wildlife to ensure animals for the future. This project does not change existing wildlife habitat; the site will be developed unless it is dedicated as open space; and with alternatives for uses, this proposal is best. Urged support. Mayor Dekker acknowledged a petition containing 266 signatures in opposition to the proposal, and 170 e-mail messages from People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). The comments addressing a bazaar plexi-glass zoo and constraint of animals are issues that the Town Board Board of Trustees - June 8, 1999 - Page 7 cannot address; the Board is limited to consider Special Review criteria (4 points). There are also supporters for this proposal. At 9:52 p.m., Mayor Dekker announced a 7-minute recess. Mayor Dekker reconvened the meeting at 10:01 p.m. to hear opposition testimony, and he requested any groups in the audience appoint a spokesman to eliminate any repetition. Opposition was heard from the following: Susan Wolf, ecologist for 20 years. 1/today, zoos are moving away from cages; 2/adequate animal space has not been defined; 3/the Applicant mentioned that the Animal Welfare Act is responsible for standards, however, the Applicant failed to mention that the USDA has minimal standards. The USDA allows shocking conditions, therefore a company may still be in compliance; 4/the Applicant has underestimated animal waste; 5/questioned whether rehab animals will be used, the Applicant mentioned only birds. Rehab animals should be minimized. Bob Burger resides at 650 Moraine Ave. at Telemark Resort. Is aware of existing traffic congestion and questioned the left turn access and noted an existing elk grazing area. Jim Martell, Attorney representing the River Rock Town Home Assn. The developers do not have a use by right to have this development at this particular location; the Town Board can approve only if the benefits outweigh adverse conditions. The Applicant must prove their proposal will not have a detrimental impact; urged the Board review the Traffic Study in context for this particular highway and existing conditions. Additional concerns were: the undesignated area on the proposal, building and site design, drainage facilities, is this facility needed, questioned whether this proposal would increase the economic base, this proposal is not consistent with adjacent land use, and urged denial. Dave Crawford, Director of Animal Defense/Boulder. Presented Handouts on zoos, and photos showing animals in captivity. Animals, even though they may be born in captivity, are not tame animals-you cannot breed-out wildness; isn't aware of any animal rehabilitator that would want their animals put on display; and having an interpretive center next to RMNP is absurd. Judith Lamy, has attended all the hearings, questioned whether this proposal meets the Special Review criteria, and urged the Town Board to give due consideration to each point. Ms. Lamy requested the Board research ICM's corporate structure and do their homework. Jessica Sandler, PETA Representative, Lakewood. Visitors pass through Estes Park for the beauty not this proposal. PETA and similar organizations represent more than 10 million Americans and none of them want this proposal to be approved. There is a study that profiled children's behavior when they go to zoos, it found that a large number of children spend time making faces, mimicking, and laughing at animals. Accreditation in no way assures quality of care, e.g., San Diego is an accredited facility, and that didn't prevent beating of an animal, nor the Denver zoo from breeding non- endangered animals for hunting. Ms. Sandler cautioned that this issue can be 'national", PETA is watching carefully. Don Berger commented that the Board had refused smaller businesses to have expansion due to buses making smoke, and this Applicant is merely larger. Board of Trustees - June 8, 1999 - Page 8 Pauline Bustamante. Questioned how the left turn level of service changed/improved from the last Planning Commission, and took offense at the Mayor's comments relative to citizens signing petitions. Mayor Dekker apologized for any comments that may have offended Ms. Bustamante. Don Reed, new resident, expressed his concerns with what the benefit will be to Estes Park and the developers in particular. Perhaps the Board should consider projected forecasts/profits that could help the Board make their decision. Mr. Reed has no political affiliations, and noted his opinion that this proposal is "already a done deal." When the Wildfire proposal was being heard, Mr. Ingersoll was specifically questioned and required to provide the percentage figure and association fees; this Applicant has only supplied intents such as drainage, odor/filtration system. Alan Allwell, stated he carried the petitions requesting denial of this proposal, and the ratio of supporters was approximately 30/1. If the proposal was taken to referendum, "it would fail gloriously." Rebuttal was heard from: Bill Ziegler, who commented on the Animal Welfare Act, and certain parameters for watering, caging, behavior enrichment, etc. Veterinarians conduct inspections; there will not be any hoofed animals; with his vast experience, he is well aware of the amount of waste produced by animals; encouraged Mr. Crawford's assistance in locating rehab animals and is willing to work with any organization to equally share information/programs. Assistant Town Administrator Repola confirmed that this proposal is a Concept Plan Review, details are required during the Development Plan stage. Trustee Baudek questioned how the Board has assurance that the building and site will be constructed as presented. Staff responded that such detail would be provided to the Planning Commission if this Concept Plan is approved. However, the Town Board does have a right to approve with conditions. Mr. Kochevar confirmed that the design is virtually completed. The interior space has been reviewed by staff. Ms. Sloan qualified her previous statements, confirming she has no personal gain to the developer or project. Mr. Delich responded on the traffic question confirming that the growth ratio was changed from 1% to 3% as updated information was provided by CDOT between the Planning Commission meeting and this meeting. There being no further public testimony, Mayor Dekker closed the public hearing. Town Board comments: Jeffrey/the concept is a great opportunity, she had no pre-conceived ideas on this proposal, and remains concerned with traffic issues. Gillette/concurred with Trustee Jeffrey, the Center is a great opportunity for Estes Park, and requested staff confirm CDOT is willing to issue a highway permit. Planner Joseph reiterated that CDOT has issued verbal approval. Staff also recognized that details that may be subject to hopefully minor revision, rather than significant changes to drawings and written information. Doylen/clarified uses by right relative to this site and proposal, and that she respected the testimony offered on this proposal. Baudek/the economy is based on tourism, the Town Board has an obligation to look at not only the good times, but the bad times. Something will be built on this property; this developer has done more for mitigation that any other developer. Barker/this is a top-flight project. The community has a need for something else to do, and traffic concerns have Board of Trustees - June 8,1999 - Page 9 been mitigated. Hbdthe traffic congestion on this portion of Hwy. 36 has existed for a number of years. Finding that the benefits of this Special Review will outweigh any adverse impacts for the Town or the vicinity, Trustee Jeffrey stated (1) the proposal is suitable for the location on Moraine Ave.- as the proposed use will not damage nearby land uses; there are adequate roads, water, sewer service, and drainage facilities serving the location; and the use as proposed takes into consideration the environmental characteristics of the site with regard to public safety and the natural environment; (2) the proposed building and site design avoids visual, noise, or other intrusion into the adjacent premises; is not a departure from the established character of the neighborhood; and avoids unnecessary damage to the natural environment of the site; (3) the proposal meets a social, economic, or community need of the Town; and (4) the proposal is consistent with the objections of the Town's C-O Commercial Outlying Zoning District; and moved Special Review Request #99-01 for the Wildlife Center be approved, contingent upon staff recommendations 1 through 6, including the drainage plan as proposed above, and it was seconded by Trustee Gillette. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Dekker expressed the Board's appreciation for all comments, and announced a 5-minute recess at 11:22: the meeting reconvened at 11:26 p.m. 5. Amended Plat and Rezoning of Tract 69, Fall River Addition, RMNP/Applicant. Mayor Dekkbr opened the public hearing, and Senior Planner Joseph reported that the site is 35 acres, zoned E-Estate, on the north side of Hwy. 34, west of Nicky's Restaurant. The proposal is to divide the site into two lots: Tract 69A (28.33 ac.) is proposed to be deeded to the RMNP, and Tract 69B (6.77 ac.) would remain a development lot and be rezoned to R-M Multiple Family. A plat restriction for a maximum of 10 attached dwelling or accommodation units would be included. Under current E-Estate zoning, the site will accommodate 10 units; the proposal amounts to a density transfer that results in a tightly clustered development. The RMNP supports the proposal due to the Big Horn Sheep habitat; the plat incorporates the Planning Commission recommendations, and the Planning Commission did recommend approval. Approval of the rezoning request is being recommended with the condition that rezoning will be concurrent with the transfer of ownership; staff is in receipt of the deed, and it should be recorded with the plat. RMNP Supt. Jones confirmed the Park accepts this property. Bill Van Horn, Applicant's representative, stated this property adjoins Estes Valley Land Trust property, eventual development will be compatible. Those speaking in favor: Curt Buchholtz, Dir. RMNP Associates. Edith Gaylord Harper is the donor and she is hopeful her generosity will inspire others to do the same. Mr. Buchholtz requested the Mayor send a letter of appreciation to Ms. Harper for making this open space possible, and Mayor Dekker supported the request. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dekker declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Doylen) the Amended Plat and Rezoning of Tract 69, Fall River Addition, be approved, as well as the rezoning request of Tract 69B to R-M Multiple Family, and it passed unanimously. Board of Trustees- June 8,1999 - Page 10 6. Appointment - Estes Park Planning Commission. Mayor Dekker announced that Margaret Clark will serve on the Planning Commission filling one of two vacancies, and her term will expire April, 2000. 7. Amendment to JANCO Development Agreement for Lots 32-35 and Portions of Lots 1, 31 and 37, White Meadow View Place Addition. Assistant Town Administrator Repola briefed the Trustees on the previously approved Development Agreement, adding that the Development Plan and Business Performa made certain assumptions. Among those was a $200,000 grant at 2% from the Colorado Division of Housing. The state funds were not obtained. The estimated total residents for maximum occupancy was 85, and the Agreement allows JANCO to charge rents up to the 50% level of median income for Larimer County. The properly consists of a combination of seasonal and year- round residences. Of the 26 free-standing units, only 14 can be used year-round. Four of the sixteen motel units are kitchenettes and are planned for year-round use. Consequently, JANCO currently has a limited ability to generate rental revenue during the cold weather months. JANCO is seeking an amendment to the Agreement that would allow them , to charge rents up to the 60% level of median income for Larimer County. The result would be a rent ceiling that is approximately 20% higher than the original proposal. The Town has made the first payment of $12,500 in consideration of JANCO providing low-cost housing. Staff further advised there are two options available to the Town Board: (1) allow JANCO to permanently increase rents to the 60% level, or (2) provide a temporary increase to the 60% level until January 1, 2002, and then return to the 50% level once JANCO has exercised the density transfer allowance. The Amendment does not require the Town to spend additional funds, and Lon Kinnie confirmed there is no impact to current residents. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Gillette) the following Amendment to the JANCO Development Agreement be approved: provide a temporary increase to the 60% level until January 1, 2002, and then return to the 50% level once JANCO has exercised the density transfer allowance, and it passed unanimously. The Town Board confirmed that the Agreement may be revisited should the need arise. 8. Liquor Licensing: A. Transfer of Ownership: From GHV Colorado, Inc., to New Stanley Associates, LP, whose Partners are New Stanley Hotel Management, Inc., et al, Hotel and Restaurant License, 333 Wonderview Ave. Clerk O'Connor reported that this application transfers the liquor license to the proper corporation. It was moved and seconded (Baudek/Hix) the Transfer of Ownership to New Stanley Associates, LP, be approved, and it passed unanimously. B. Set public hearing date of Julv 13, 1999 for Transfer of Ownership from Black Canyon Restaurants, Inc., to Twin Owls Steakhouse, Inc., Hotel and Restaurant License, 800 MacGreqor Ave. Clerk O'Connor advised that pursuant to pending litigation involving the property owner and the previous restaurant operators, a public hearing was being requested. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the public hearing date of July Board of Trustees - June 8,1999 - Page 11 13, 1999 be scheduled to consider the Transfer of Ownership to Twin Owls Steakhouse, Inc., and it passed unanimously. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 1. Food Tax Refund Report - Clerk O'Connor reported that there were atotal of 141 applications this year for a total expenditure of $19,600. The budgeted amount was $22,000. Applications were processed from 44 families, 30 disabled, and 67 seniors. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dekker noted that the June 22, 1999 Town Board Meeting has been cancelled pursuant to scheduling conflicts. There being no further business, Mayor Dekker adjourned the meeting at 11:52 p.m. Robert L. Dekker, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk BRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee June 10, 1999 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Barker and Jeffrey Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Light and Power Director Matzke, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Hix called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. Telephone SYstem Upgrade - Authorization to Purchase and Amend Budget. Director Matzke reported that the Municipal Building computer switch for the voice mail system and the voice mail software have been upgraded since the system was originally purchased in 1993, however, the capacity and functionality of the original system remain unchanged. The requested improvements to the existing telephone system include incoming TI capability to provide additional trunk capacity, digital TI connection to the Elm Road shop facilities to provide centralized voice mail, and direct inward dialing (DID) telephone service. This telephone system upgrade does not appear in the 1999 budget, however, the $44,928 lease payment from Platte River for the fiber optic agreement with ICG provides funding to complete the system improvements. Director Matzke noted that a budget amendment is required to provide spending authority for these funds. Executone provided two proposals to upgrade system. Both proposals include replacing the telephone switch at the Light and Power Service Building with a switch capable of the TI digital connection and centralized voice mail. This will allow elimination of all existing leased circuits from U.S. West between the Municipal Building and the Elm Road shop facilities with ample capacity to support additional users over the digital connection. The Elm Road switch replacement will make use of the existing Executone desk phones in the Light and Power Service building and provide 16 additional phones for offices in the Light and Power Service Building, Fleet Shop, and Water Shop. The installed cost of the Elm Road switch replacement is $17,616.25. Proposal 1: Upgrade the existing system to accept an incoming TI digital trunk line and the digital TI connection to the Elm Road switch. This option provides the desired improvements presented above, but leaves no room for additional incoming trunk lines, internal extensions, or off premise extensions. The cost of this option is $9,848.85. Proposal 2: Expand to System 432. This option provides the desired improvements and has capacity for additional lines, internal extensions, and additional lines to other Town facilities. The cost of this option is $23,648.46. The Light and Power Department requested that the Elm Road telephone switch be replaced at a cost of $17,616.25 and that Proposal 2 expanding the Municipal Building telephone switch be accepted at a cost of $23,648.46. Director Matzke also requested that the 1999 budget be amended to include an additional $44,928 under Light and Power Capital Communication Equipment to fund the Telephone System Upgrade. The Committee endorsed the project, however Town Board review will be delayed pending the year end budget review, per Assistant Town Administrator Repola. Windcliff Trenching Contract- Approval of Change Order Director Matzke reported that in April 1999, the Town Board approved a contract with Lyons Excavation for the joint 'ron-hing projecl in Windcliff Subdivision at a cost of $15,060. The route of the project was moumud, at the Tow/: request: to better utilize existing easements and BRADFOR'PUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee, June 10, 1999 - Page 2 rights-of-way. The requested modifications resulted in an additional 475' of new trench. A portion of trench in the original contract was 100' less than the bid amount. The change order request is for a net additional 375' at $14.48 per foot or $5,430. The total cost of the contract is $20,490. The 1999 budget has $17,500 for underground small projects. The remainder of this contract can be funded from the Overhead Small Projects. The Committee recommends approval of the change order request from Lyons Excavating for $5,430. One Ton Utilitv Truck Update Director Matzke reported that the Committee previously approved replacement of the Light and Power Department's 1985 Ford one-ton four-wheel drive truck, however, Ford discontinued production of this vehicle and no other vehicles evaluated by staff meet the needs of the department. Director Matzke stated that the replacement of this truck will be postponed until a vehicle is identified that meets or exceeds the capabilities of the existing truck. Director Matzke also recognized the efforts of the employee team consisting of Dave Mahany, Ron Hersh, and Mike Jones. REPORTS Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) Report: Director Matzke reported that a resolution was passed granting the General Manager authority to execute an option contract to purchase a gas turbine at Rawhide. The option will lock in the purchase price at $18.5 million. PRPA is currently providing information to various Municipal Boards and the general public regarding the increased capacity needs of PRPA. Financial Report: The income statement and graphs for May were distributed. Director Matzke noted that significant capital costs from large projects scheduled in 1999 will impact the income statement in future months. Project Updates: The Pine Valley Three Phase Conversion is nearing completion. The temporary poles in the downtown area are in place and should be wired soon. The poles were temporarily installed to accommodate the Highway 34/36 widening and Estes Substation projects. The switchgear bids were received for the Estes Substation project. The low bid has been received and it will be reviewed at a future meeting. The switchgear should be delivered as originally planned. Chairman Hix noted that a complaint had been received regarding the reception of the local cable channel. Director Matzke will address easement, reception, and other customer issues with Intermountain CableComm. There being no further business, Chairman Hix adjourned the meeting at 8:45 a.m. 9. Vam-pLldinu Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk BRADFORD.U.LISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee July 8, 1999 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Barker and Jeffrey Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Light and Power Director Matzke, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Hix called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. Fall River Hydro Restoration Planning Study - Final Report. Gary Long of Long Hoeft Architects presented a Historic Structures Report covering the power plant history, original and altered conditions, preservation plan, scope of work/outline specifications, and project costs for the Fall River Hydroelectric Plant Project. Chad DeVore of the Natural Resource Connection presented a report on the Concept Exhibit Plan including a project overview, goals to be achieved through the exhibit planning and design, resource inventory, themes and storylines, and exhibit descriptions. Director Matzke noted that the next step will be completion of the Implementation Grant Application due in October. The Committee expressed their appreciation to Messrs. Long and DeVore on their presentations. Estes Substation Feeder Relocation Project- Authorization to Bid. Director Matzke reported that the Light and Power Dept., in conjunction with PRPA, are in the process of replacing the existing Estes Substation near the Chamber of Commerce with a new substation near the Estes Power Plant Switchyard and the new fire station. This project requires the reconnection of the four circuits presently fed by the existing station to the new station. The Light and Power Dept. requested $300,000 in the 1999 budget for construction of this project. This project is also included in the Light and Power Revenue Bonds Reimbursement Resolution approved by the Town Board in August 1998. The Committee recommends staff be authorized staff to proceed with the trench and conduit installation contract bid process for the Estes Substation Feeder Relocation Project. Colorado-Biq Thompson Proiect Special Use Permit- Draft. Director Matzke presented a draft Special Use Permit for the new substation outlining special conditions for the project. Director Matzke noted that Town Attorney White and Parks and Streets Supt. Speedlin have reviewed the document and did not recommend changes to the permit. The Committee recommends approval of the Special Use Permit and agreed that a final version of the permit could be presented directly to the Town Board for approval at the July 27th meeting. Wiest Drive Parking Lot Underground - Approval of Change Order Request. Director Matzke reported that the Wiest Dr. parking lot trenching contract was awarded to Drake Contractors, Inc. at a cost of $27,000. During construction of the project, a portion of the conduit was rerouted in Moraine Ave. at the request of the EPSD to avoid a conflict with an existing sewer line. The contractor performed this additional work at staffs request. The Committee recommends approval of the change order request from Drake Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $4,000. Big Thompson Three Phase Conversion - Postponement of Construction Contract Bid. Director Matzke explained that in the Long Range Plan, Electrical Systems Consultants (ESC) recommended completion of the Big Thompson Three Phase Conversion project in two phases. Construction of Phase I was planned in 1999 and Phase Il was anticipated in 2003. In April BRADFOR/PUILISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Lightand Power Committee, July 8,1999 - Page 2 1999, the Town Board authorized the department to hire ESC to perform the engineering and line design for both phases at an estimated cost of $50,250. Engineering for the project is substantially complete and a revised estimate from ESC of $254,239 for construction of Phase I and $114,437 for construction of Phase Il. ESC has also recommended that the phases be bid and constructed as a whole package to minimize start up costs for Phase 11. The Light and Power Dept. requested $200,333 in the 1999 budget for construction of Phase I. Of that amount, $50,250 has already been committed to fund the engineering and line design. At this point, there are no projects in the 1999 budget that can be cancelled or delayed to allow the funding of the Big Thompson Three Phase Conversion. The Committee recommends that the bid process for the Big Thompson Three Phase Conversion Project be postponed and considered for funding in the 2000 budget or later and that both phases be included as one project in the bid request. REPORTS Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) Report: No report. Financial Report: The June income statements were not available. The June graphs were reviewed. Monthly energy purchases and demand continue to outpace previous years. Project Updates: It is anticipated that PRPA will complete the fiber optic line installation in July and will add the Fairgrounds and School District to the fiber optic network. Platte River is also installing video conferencing equipment in the Town Board Annex conference room. Installation of equipment at the Municipal Building and Shop Facilities for the radio system upgrade has been completed, all lease agreements have been signed, and it is anticipated that this project will be completed soon. The Joint Use Pole Audit is underway. A report of findings will be presented upon completion of the audit. A new fluorescent streetlight that offers lower energy consumption and a brighter light has been installed at Village Square Shopping Center. This new technology light will be evaluated to determine energy and cost savings. The transfer switch on the new emergency generator for the Municipal Building was damaged during installation. The switch has been ordered and will be replaced by the supplier. Proposed Sale of Intermountain CableComm Facilities - Discussion: Town Administrator Widmer reported on the proposed sale of Intermountain CableComm and presented a request to transfer the cable franchise from Cable Systems, Inc. (CSI) to Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC (CHC). Improvements and upgrades will be made to the system as part of the purchase agreement and Walt Van Lue, Gen. Mgr. for Intermountain CableComm (ICC) commented on the company's commitment to repairing/upgrading the system and improving customer service. Mr. Van Lue discussed a detailed prioritized list of action items that will be completed by ICC and addressed concerns presented by the Committee. Town Administrator Widmer noted that Town Attorney White will review the purchase offer and draft a resolution accepting the sale and transfer of the franchise. Town Administrator Widmer explained that the Town has 120 days to review and approve the purchase offer. There being no further business, Chairman Hix adjourned the meeting at 9:35 a.m. 01/LUKE Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee June 17,1999 Committee: Chairman Baudek, Trustees Barker and Jeffrey Attending: Chairman Baudek Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Public Works Director Linnane, Water Supt. Goehring, Clerk O'Connor Absent: Trustees Barker and Jeffrey Chairman Baudek called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. 1999 WATER LOOPING PROJECT - REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD BID. The Committee reviewed a vicinity map and Director Linnane outlined the following Water Line Replacement Projects: Al Fresco Subdivision Fall River Prospect Mountain/Hwy. 7 Interconnect Director Linnane noted that an incorrect budget figure was reported during the Public Works Committee meeting in April, and that the correct budget amount is $600,000.00. Bids were received June 14th, and low bids are summarized below: LOCATION COMPANY BID AMOUNT Al Fresco Subdivision Kitchen Co. $213,298.00 Fall River Weinland Const. 48,907.00 Prospect Mtn./Hwy. 7 Weinland Const. 164,030.45 Total Cost $426,235.45 Both construction companies have a good reputation with the Town. Construction of the Fall River line is to begin at the end of September to accommodate the adjacent commercial property. All other construction is scheduled to begin in August, with asphalt work to be completed by November. An additional $20,000 was budgeted in the Water Fund for the Annual Fire Dept. Hydrant Upgrade Project. This project has yet to be determined by the Fire Dept., however, it will be coordinated to be performed by either construction company. This $20,000 has not been included in the cost summary above. Therefore, the project cost is $426,235.45 plus $20,000 = $446,235.45. The budgeted amount is $580,000 + $20,000 = $600,000.00. The Committee recommends the bids as identified above be accepted, with the $20,000 Fire Dept. Project to be negotiated and performed by either construction company, 1998 WATER LOOPING PROJECT - REQUEST APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER. The 1998 Water Looping Project replaced a water line adjacent to Chapin Lane in the Spring of 1999. The disturbed ground along the new line allowed the ground water to travel along the water line causing the water to surface adjacent to a downstream property owner, thus entering the structure's crawl space. To mitigate this problem, the Water Dept. contracted with Kitchen Co. and installed three clay dikes to intercept and BRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - June 17, 1999 - Page 2 redirect the ground water. The cost will not exceed $1,200, and staff is requesting retroactive approval of this change order. The Committee recommends retroactive approval of this Change Order at a cost of $1,200, with the additional expense to be funded from the 1999 Capital Improvement Project line item. REPORTS. The Committee reviewed the Customer Service Response Report for May, 1999. Chairman Baudek requested staff clarify if it is a legal requirement to notify utilities prior to digging. Staff will add this statement to all construction plans. There being no further business, Chairman Baudek adjourned the meeting at 8:17 a.m. Vickie O'Connor, CMC/AAE, Town Clerk BRADFOROPUBLISHING Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee July 1, 1999 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Baudek and Gillette Attending: Chairman Hix and Trustee Gillette Absent Chairman Baudek Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Deputy Police Chief Filsinger, Fire Chief Dorman, Deputy Town Clerk van Deutekom Chairman Hix called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Town of Estes Park Community Survey: Deputy Chief Filsinger presented a report summarizing the 83 Community Survey responses received by the Police Department. Citizens were requested to rate their satisfaction of the Police Department, Animal Control, and Dispatch services. The surveys also included a request to rate the level of awareness for the following programs: Blue Santa (55%), Disaster Preparedness (46%), Neighborhood Watch (43%), and the DARE (81%). An overall satisfaction rating of 4 was received in all areas except handling leash law violations, which received a rating of 3. Parking: Deputy Chief Filsinger presented ticket statistics from May 21, 1999 thru June 26, 1999. A total of 136 tickets were issued. The largest numbers of tickets were issued for the following violations: sign restriction (56), 3-hour overtime parking (54), and parking in intersection (12). July 4, 1999: Deputy Chief Filsinger reported that 12 Larimer County Sheriffs Reserves and Posse members will assist the Police Department on July 4th and Stanley Park will be designated as an alcohol-free zone. FIRE DEPARTMENT Convention Recap: Chief Dorman reported that the State Firefighters Convention, recently held in Estes Park, was very successful. Programs from the convention were distributed outlining the schedule of events and training offered. The next 2000 State Convention will be held in Cortez. Fire Danger Report: Chief Dorman reported that the current fire danger rating is 'Moderate." However, with the anticipated dry weather and high temperatures, the rating could be upgraded to "High" by the July 4th weekend. Chief Dorman cautioned the public to use extreme care with fireworks and campfires. Reminder: Fireworks that leave the ground or explode are illegal. REPORTS Correspondence Summary: The Committee reviewed correspondence received in June 1999 praising the efforts of the Police Department. There being no further business, Chairman Hix adjourned the meeting at 8:15 a.m. hÂ¢va~ A.u isiv Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk DRAOFORD PUB LISHI NG CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission June 15,1999 Commission: Chair Al Sager, Commissioners Harriet Burgess, Margaret Clark, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chair Sager, Commissioners Burgess, Clark, Hix, Pohl and Thomas Absent: None Also Attending: Director Stamey, Senior Planner Joseph, and Recording Secretary Wheatley Absent Trustee Liaison G. Hix, Town Attorney White Chair Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. and welcomed the newly appointed commissioner, Margaret Clark. 1. MINUTES of the May 18,1999 were approved as presented. 2. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Development Plan 99-07, Lot 44, Block 1, Fall River Estates, Fall River Estates, InclApplicant. This is a proposal for a single building with 2,040 square feet of commercial use on the lower level, and one dwelling unit on the upper level. The building would be elevated approximately three feet above existing grade. A ten- space parking lot is proposed. The site is almost entirely covered with wetlands and a Corps of Engineers permit is required. Paul Kochevar of Estes Park Surveyors represented the applicant and reviewed the proposal. A conditional approval from the local regulating entity is required by the Corps prior to requesting their permit. Discussions have made with the homeowners association regarding the possibility of exchanging land in the outlot. It is highly possible that this plan will not be built, but approval is needed to apply to the Corps of Engineers. The proposed building will be elevated in order to allow some daylight to reach a portion of the vegetation below the building. The concrete sidewalk will be elevated on fill with drainage pipes below to allow for proper drainage from slope in outlot. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report and comments received from Public Works Director Linnane. The normal 30 foot setback is reduced to 20 feet at the northeast corner of the covered deck due to the provision in the Municipal Code that allows the reduction to a maximum of 20% of the width of the property. Staff report recommends approval with conditions. Mr. Kochevar responded to questions from the Commissioners. Parking requirements were discussed regarding the assumption that the dwelling unit would be occupied by the owner/operator. Two additional parking spots would be required for the two-bedroom dwelling unit. Parking lot and driveway would be built on "large gravel" with a fabric cover to allow for drainage flow. An access and utility easement exists on Outlot A and will be shown on the plat. Commissioner Thomas reviewed the letter from DOW and recommended that the Commission take it into consideration. Commissioner Pohl noted that approval would require several corrections and changes made to the existing plat. Mr. Kochevar anADFORO PUaLISHIP,GCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - June 15, 1999 Page 2 noted that if additional parking were required, he would withdraw the current proposal as major changes would be required. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Hix) the Development Plan 99- 07, Lot 44, Block 1, Fall River Estates, be continued to the July 20, 1999 meeting in order to address the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. A note should be added to the Development Plan stating: "any outdoor trash storage shall be secured against bears." 2. A new sewer easement must be recorded, and the position of the proposed building must be adjusted a few feet to avoid this new easement. 3. The Town shall not issue a building permit prior to the applicant securing the required Corps of Engineers permit. No development activity or site work / site disturbance of any kind (including but not limited to clearing, grading, or filling) shall be permitted prior to issuance of a building permit by the Town. A note to this effect shall be placed on the approved Development Plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall prepare a construction site plan that shows in detail the limits of site disturbance as defined in the Corps of Engineers permit. This construction plan shall identify construction fencing as required to provide assurance that construction activity will be executed in conformance with the Corps of Engineers permit. 5. Revisions be made to the plat to correct spelling, dimensions and legend. 6. Revisions to include two additional parking spaces (or a reduction in square footage). 3. REPORTS - There were none. 4. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 2:15 p.m. V'Vijvj-l_, UyÂ·Ao Â«t,+r- Meribeth Wheatley, Recording(Secretary RESOLUTION 10-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging Jim Barleen, B & B FOOD MART, a 3.2% Beer, Off License, Liquor License No. 03-23802-0000, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: B & B FOOD MART 1110 Woodstock Dr. P. 0. Box 2326 Estes Park, CO 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION 11-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging Ahmed I. Zaina, BEAVER PT. QUICK STOP GROCERY, a 3.2% Beer License, Liquor License No. 03-46629-0000, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: BEAVER PT. QUICK STOP GROCERY 911 Moraine Ave. P. 0. Box 3584 Estes Park, CO 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION 12-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging Nicky's Restaurant & Lounge Ltd., NICKYS RESTAURANT & LOUNGE, a Hotel & Restaurant License, Liquor License No. 03-17032-0000, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: Nicky's Restaurant & Lounge Ltd. NICKY'S RESTAURANT & LOUNGE 1350 Fall River Rd. P. 0. Box 1961 Estes Park, CO 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION 13-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging Notchtop Bakery & Caf@, Inc., NOTCHTOP BAKERY & CAE, a Beer & Wine License, Liquor License No. 26- 23593-0000, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: Notchtop Bakery & Caf6, Inc. NOTCHTOP BAKERY & CAFE 459 E. Wonderview Dr. #4 Estes Park, CO 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION 14-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging SAFEWAY STORES 46, INC., a 3.2% Beer License, Liquor License No. 21-70664-0038, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: Safeway Stores 46, Inc. SAFEWAY STORES 46, INC. 451 E. Wonderview Ave. P. O. Box 5927 T.A. Denver, CO 80217 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY.OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION 15-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging GHV-Colorado, Inc., STANLEY HOTEL, THE, a Hotel & Restaurant License, Liquor License No. 10-88927- 0000, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 pm in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: GHV-Colorado, Inc. STANLEY HOTEL, THE 333 Wonderview Ave. P. 0. Box 1767 Estes Park, CO 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION 16-99 WHEREAS, a complaint by the Estes Park Police Department was presented to the Trustees of the Town of Estes Park on July 13, 1999 charging Park Wheel Company, Inc., WHEEL, THE, a Tavern License, Liquor License No. 03-14465-0000, with certain violations of the statutes of the State of Colorado and Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Liquor Enforcement Division; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees hereby determines that there is probable cause to believe that the aforementioned Licensee has violated one or more of the statutes and/or rules and regulations governing the operations of the license as more fully set forth in the complaint; and WHEREAS, the Board believes it is necessary to hold a hearing and issue an Order to Show Cause why the aforementioned license should not be suspended or revoked due to the violations presented to the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a show cause hearing shall be held pursuant to Section 12-47-601, C.R.S., and a Notice of Hearing be issued to the Licensee to appear and show cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing shall take place on Tuesday, August 24, 1999 at 7:00 pm in the Board Room of the Estes Park Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, Estes Park, Colorado. Section 2. That the Town Clerk shall cause an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Hearing on the aforementioned complaint to be mailed to the following: Park Wheel Company, Inc. WHEEL, THE 132 E. Elkhorn Ave. P. O. Box 3890 Estes Park, CO 80517 INTRODUCED, READ AND PASSED THIS DAY OF ,19 TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION # 17-99 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: That the filing date of the application for a New Tavern Liquor License, filed by Hospitality Specialists, Inc., dba MOLLY B. RESTAURANT, 200-212 Moraine Ave., Estes Park, Colorado, is June 9, 1999. It is hereby ordered that a public hearing on said application shall be held in the Board Room of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 7:00 P.M., and that the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of said application and hearing shall be the area included within a radius of 3.5 miles, as measured from the center of the applicant's property. DATED this day of ,1999. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk DR 8439 (06/97) 21 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION APPLICATION FOR A 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (303) 205-2300 ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT, YOU MUST BE NONPROFIT DONE OF THE FOLLOWIN~ (See back for details.) 1 CHECK ONE: ~SOCIAL ~ CHARTERED BRANCH, LODGE OR CHAPTER OF A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OR SOCIETY C]FRATERNAL D RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION D PATRIOTIC U PHILANTHROPIC INSTITUTION D POLITICAL D POLITICAL CANDIDATE EATHLETIC EMUNICIPALITY OWNING ARTS FACILITIES DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE LIAB TYPE OF SPECIAL EVENT APPLICANT IS APPLYING FOR: â€ž " ~ DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE. 2110 m MALL VINOUS AND SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR $25.00 PER DAY LIQUOR PERMIT NUMBER 2170 m FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE (3.2 Beer) $10.00 PER DAY 1. I*ME OF APPLICANT ORGANIiATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE State Sales Tax Number (Required) 0060(2Â«60 '-HueTEE, 3Uu,Pa-D, 4~*7061 AU Dr~ 09.9111&-0000 2. MAILING ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION OP POE-ITICAL. CANDIDATE 3. ADDRESS OF PLACE TO HAVE SPECIAL EVENT (include street, city/town and ZIP) (include street, city/town and ZIP) @67/0 3.14,M, toe U)Aq â‚¬FrAIG it-g ---A,ta-.CG,Ag /9,wÂ£ 350cy Uk.U, Aue.0 ta(30 *)01+ 1229 BÂ·Agi=020 Ader' 067-ES 614Â£44. Ce Toi/7 NAME ' . DATE OF BIRTH HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, State, ZIP) .>*PHONE NUMBEFF ' > 9 OWÂ»,6 30 3 4. PB~S./SEC'Y Ol~ORG. or POLITICA4 CANDIDATE A U.2- 2.- & A.0 +Wâ€¢ e.v B-&-7-57 11 8--71 AID be.aertr~) ENS, 94 /-7173 5. EVENÂ¥1MANAGERA-lopitto <6 ED. 0,4 Erbaq A. L .24 20133- GO -11-5 1 803 - bli E- 6. HAS APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE BEEN 7. IS PREMISES NOW LICENSED UNDER STATE LIQUOR OR BEER COPE? ISSUED A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT THIS CALENDAR YEAR? ~ NO ~ YES HOW MANY DAYS? 0 NO ~ES TO WHOM? Ljous C,Â£te, of 812 8014_ , w. DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE POSSESSION OR WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR THE USE OF THE PREMISES TO BE LICENSED? ~es O No U. *,6,~ 'Â¥ .Â¥,11 y LIST BELOW THE EXACT DATE(S) FOR WHICH APPLICATION IS BEING MADE FOR PERMIT sy Date E-,7 -49 Date Date Date Date Hours From 21/Of.m. Hours From .m. Hours From .m. Hours From .m. Hours From To 11, 00 4.m. To .m. To .m. To .m. To e .* V. - OATH OF APPLICANT ./.491 .4 - ../ : ./ 1.4..â€žItâ‚¬ 1 duclare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and 5 +I, that all information therein is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. 4 7 Ani,u. 06 (41(fi DATE 9Ut R tf /riaÂ»u, - 1 L- /763 , 32 . /. 4 ./ REPORT AND APPROVAL OFLOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITYOR COUNTY)1,...A' pi"* * =. The foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant iksÂ®sfactory, andwe do'rebort that such permit, if granted, will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 48, C.R.S.,Â·hs amended.' r> - THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. ~<; 1,Â¥. >1 1 I ' ..1.1 LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) 2 CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER OF CITY/COUNTY CLERK 2 COUNTY SIGNATURE TITLE DATE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY -I %' .' I. LIABILITY INFORMATION ' .: A f I 'cÂ·Â·&-Â· ./ I I I t .1''Iv kj . ~ I Z N ' 4 I ... ~, TOTAL f : 03 ft License Account Numbor - Liability Date State. , k /3 4 1 . Â£ 64... & a L. , "92 1 e {1 P ... i.j? 4. .F ? Â·Â· i ' V Â· 3. 1 a.z * r -750 (999) # 1 -> , 2 7.<4 . (Instructions on Reverse Size) EE 7115 0 80/blut Y /3 A] 67- 72) 5Â£4Â·tÂ£ - C.JE- 600063 L\Vi -ID SE-T--UP 7-m, 8/f-42>ket 4 1,0 721 â‚¬*818'r #4--*LL /41,0 06 orr-4 011/2. Fo-06 A--*d,4 75 0&-6 7107- Â·FAYÂ« AN 9 /,k[ CLEÂ·Â·04);07- Dth-7742-2, 774& geramj.5 F=b A- 7~479 EFWI.UT- 6.YuLJ t.b G 0 7-0 -1- F UA -7-AL 8/42 + Fba 13 /h264. (Lutttl 6,81 2- râ‚¬,309-- 3 KL) 8 3 d 4 0 1- 1 V 1 n] f 5 TRIE -r- 6)0146 ri- A*2*-719 LL DR 8439 (06/97) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION APPLICATION FOR A 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (303) 205-2300 )RDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT, YOU MUST BE NONPROFIT D ONE OF THE FOLLOWING (See back for details.) 4 CHECK ONE: C]SOCIAL [*HARTERED BRANCH, LODGE OR CHAPTER OF A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OR SOCIETY C]FRATERNAL El RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION ~ PATRIOTIC O PHILANTHROPIC INSTITUTION El POLITICAL O POLITICAL CANDIDATE DATHLETIC O MUNICIPALITY OWNING ARTS FACILITIES DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE LIAB TYPE OF SPECIAL EVENT APPLICANT IS APPLYING FOR: 2.%,ft f?Loo'NOT WRITE INâ„¢IS,SPACEzl. .,733<3 2110 [~ MALL VINOUS AND SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR $25.00 PER DAY LIQUOR PERMIT NUMBER 2170 El FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE (3.2 Beer) $10.00 PER DAY 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE State Sales Tax Number (Required) Lions Club Of Estes Park 03-21048-0000 2. MAILING ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE 3. ADDRESS OF PLACE TO HAVE SPECIAL EVENT (include street, city/town and ZIP) (include street, city/town and ZIP) P.O.Box 2016 470 Prospect Village Dr. Estes Park, Co. 80517 Estes Park, Co. 80517 -- ... a. 4,9-0 >:Â·Â·k.Â·GÂ«..2 rks Â·~%3%Â¢'ve 7*NAME-#-'8"", -4.'iye-Â« p. 1'Â· . 4. 26J' :DATE OFBIR~Â· HOMEADDRESS,(Street, CIM'State. ZIP). M. 4 i: ::- 'itPHONE NUMBERA: 1 m:.tr Pr .1 1. 4<.-r.4 9.. Â· 1 â€ž146:Â·' '6 . v 4 .. 4 * w '*A,- 4. PRES./SECY OF ORG. or POLITICAL CANDIDATE 1041 Tranquil Lane 970-586-6533 nAn 'Rnlin J 6-27-39 Estes Park. Co. 80517 3225 Devils Gulch Rd. 5. EVENT MANAGER Edward Grueff 11-07-50 Eq t.ps: Ppr le r On RA617 970-586-5421 6. HAS APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE BEEN 7. IS PREMISES NOW LICENSED UNDER STATE LIQUOR OR BEER CODE? ISSUED A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT THIS CALENDAR YEAR? ~ No [X| YES HOW MANY DAYS? 2 U NO ~ YES TO WHOM? 8. DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE POSSESSION OR WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR THE USE OF THE PREMISES TO BE LICENSED? ElYes O No I U T..vÂ·-# 71 . 13.V/.9.36 %... 1.4LIST BELOW THE EXACT DATE(S> FOR WHICH APPLICATIOA 13{BEING MADEFOR PERMITi,Â·.7,7 Â·3.13>'1..Â·. f th.?3< 44Â·,4-.lE Date Date Date Date Date Hours__ 11 : lo a.m. Hours From .m. Hours From .m. Hours From .m. Hours From .m. 8-@Oln-99 .m. To .m. To .m. To .m. 2..-;~ -:-?.f. f;~3..:IP-~Â·~1':-7-*.1,>it~.7.t : ~tÂ·.:t~..-,. OATH OR:APPLICANT}; . :-~ ..0.6. r:â‚¬717.1.'.1.,92' g. -*Â·041' ~ ,~;- - 1< t,;'6 41.declard under tiendity'of pelury iri th-6'6666nd de~gr66 that I ti&4'read the foregoing Â®plicatio~Â¥and &11 a -Achments.thereto,(and,47 4 #. I . . f: 4 t.,L'.4,1 - 3 ....4/ 5. . . ". 4,9. .... ..r .V k . I? thatallinformationthereitii,true:correct,eahdiconibletd'to'thib@st of my knowiddge. 64>.t-=.=-4.... .y . =c-9.:f.~.1.Â·5:4 : Â·:~ V -8 <24Â·Â·Â·9;Â·4 - ,..'- . Â·Â· ..,<, , Â·Â·.... ~ b. <R SIGNU/"44( h+-1,4 9, TITLE DATE President of Lions Club ~6-18-99 ie * 33%+ 1 REpOhT AND A#pAO\466#{LOCALFILICENSINGXDTAORITÂ¥(diTY,OA,ColiNTY).7 33*74 1 . ,<. .ti- , ./ Â·i *mitrÂ»Nent~.~~:b~d~ni~~r~~len83211~Â»CU~iYECEZ}lui~3~*4*72:t ~6<,~E~~al:Zlm~a~.~.*~993rf; 1 $14*j-,-h r; 5..1.*,%' 2'~, :' 4: Cir,-0 ~'Â·.i.THEREFORE,Â·IHIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED.34Â·0 Â·4: ...:0-4. '.. 't'... 9, i.2-l, ..3.4.4'. h. . ..,4 ...44' I. -v * - I .â€ž49,- . r? ; 4. LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) 1-1 CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER OF CITY/COUNTY CLERK Rq tAg park U COUNTY 970-586-5331 SIGNATURE TITLE DATE ~ ~~v r~ DC) NOTWRrIZIN THBSPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE USE ONLY *.r 4.,Krt '&1$*Â· t.,s â€¢*Â·Â·Â·.w'. .. .a.,Ky nÂ¥''g,u, â€¢Â¥ - .."7Jtt~Â·~Â·"~Â·18kÂ»1.X * S,Â·4â€¢4 *~4/ 1Â·3.-*C, :AL.dÂ·%30 2- 1*-1.-- ** 149 ,- Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·' I'.4 *Â·<"Â·'â€¢ 'I &Â·'Â·Â·Â· :Â·g-'- ly J'Â· ' â€¢F' t Â· Â·;,*6 Â·Â·-- * - 0, i 21. ... Â·-~Â· fiy''~ ...=%. . Â· Â·.Â·* Â·Â·Â· V..>' 4,4*1- 44. :74Â· 633 ,. 3> 97'~LU'. i:,OUABIL~:INFORj~TIOI~: f f.: 1. ty,M.:io: - 2- 3. 7,4~b& NPE... . "- â€ž 'H; I . %' - ; f U.?COTALÂ£ 1 *; License Accbur,t N,mb#rte :19Â£'.jqi*iljty'Dit,R.1 7.: 44;.9State i.:Â· 0%: 3., ~ 3%% . + ' .... I . >'..... '.1,- 4,9.i . ' 7: . Fl ...t.4....V' .3-?t~y ~:~~~-" '~. 4~202 ~~ ' ,*~~ i *' 4 thU. j. 1 ' 1Â· .2.Z :.- lf:.:.3. ..".â€žr.$ M~ba 4 . ' :.i,r.y:.3,0 'd.?Â·YÂ·:74Â£ .â‚¬"C~-7 <L: '.45. . :~&4.4 2 1*'Â·Â·9:4*6 141.4, 0 . - .' (Instructions on Reverse Size) l/- 1 1 -- \4 - -svr-- U. - : 1 f k \ h - - Al 4 t\11 gil .....2 49- 44 1 . 04 ke i - % .t '2 '11 r 41 : ik L q 5 4 1,:. 51 7 A f Â· t\ 4 8 L b I . C., V) :i 2: U ~i~ \ , X Y A \ r\ 9 k f -4 1\ 7 ,\ K - 1 1 1 ... 61 -1 4/ 9 19 714 /4 5 w g- 4 1 42 i 1 kl I 0 ~) 1 I:44 1 . \ J 4 40 b 1 Â· 9 4 1 14. p 4{ 2 Cr-- ~1%2 h 0 0 44 02 C tA> 4 N 1, 9 3-LS. 7 DR 840*466/97) Page 1 C - I ). COLORADO DEPARTMENTOF REVENUE ~,. <AMENDEDÂ« 21 LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION Cd LIQUOR 1375 SHERMAN STREET OR 3.2% FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE D~NVER CO 80261 ED ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT RETAIL LICENSE APPLICATION DILL DILL CARR STONBRAKER & HUTCHINGS, P.C. (303) 777-3737 U NEW LICENSE ~ TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP Il LICENSE RENEWAL â€¢ ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN â€¢ APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) â€¢ LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ â€¢ APPLICANT SHOULD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COLORADO UQUOR AND BEER CODE(Call 303-321-4164) DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 1. Applicant is applying as a O Individual D Corporation Â¤ Limited Liability Company U Partnership (includes Limited Liability and Husband and Wife Partnerships) Â£2 Association or Other 2. Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation NEW STANLEY ASSOCIATES, LP AND GHV-COLORADO, INC. . 2a.Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) <State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone THE STANLEY HOTEL 40-)075% (970) 586-3371 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) 333 WONDERVIEW AVE. City County State ZIP Code ESTES PARK LARIMER co 80517-9019 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) Citv-or Town . State ZIP Code brcr f -b . 110X I 7 01 <2&) t.0 8 Â©s-ri 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following questions: Present Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Class of License Present Expiration Date THE STANLEY HOTEL 10-88972-0000 H&R 4-11-2000 SECTION A APPLICATION FEES LIAB V SECTION D ,LIQUOR LICENSE FEES 0 U Late Renewal Application Fee....... .$500.00 1940 0 Retail Liquor Store License (city) ........................ 6202.50 2300 0 Application Fee for New License.............................. 650.00 1940 E Retail Liquor Store License (county) ..................... 287.50 2300 0 Application Fee-New License Concurrent Review.... 750.00 1950 0 Liquor Licensed Drugstore (city) .......................... 202.50 2310 Â® Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership ............... 650.00 1950 Il Liquor Licensed Drugstore (county) ..................... 287.50 SECTION B 3.2% BEER LICENSE FEES 1960 0 Beer & Wine License (city)...................................326.25 2121 El Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (city) ....,,...,............ $71.25 1960 0 Beer & Wine License (county)............,................. 411.25 2121 0 Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (county) ................... 92.50 1970' [EH&R LicenseK]city []county .........................475.00 2122 D Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (city) ........................ 71.25 1980 OH&R Licensew/opt Prem Clcity C]county......475.00 2422 0 Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises-(county) ........,,...,,....92.50 f V OCIub License C]city Ocounty............................283.75 2123 E Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (city) .................. 71.25 20'10 0 Tavern License Ocity Ocounty........................475.00 2123 E Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (county) ............. 92.50 2020 0 Arts License Clcity [3 county.............................283.75 SECTION C RELATED FEES AND PERMITS 2030Â· O Racetrack License Clcity []county .................... 475.00 2040 El Optional Premises License El city 0 county...... 475.00 2210-100 (999) m Retail Warehouse Storage Permit ...................... $75.00 1905 Il Retail Gaming Tavern Lic C]city C]county........ 475.00 1980-100 (999) m Addition of Optional Premises to existing hotel/restaurant 1975 E Brew-Pub License 725.00 $75.00 x Total Fee 1970-750 (999) E Manager's Registration (hotel & restaurant only) ... $75.00 Il Other No Fee O 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises Only Delivery Permit 1 No Fee C] Retail Liquor Store Delivery Permit , DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY LIABILITY INFORMAnON County City Industry Type License Account Number ~ Liability Date License Issued Through (Expiration Date) State City County -750 (999) 2180-100 (999) 2190-100 (999) 1~(R29) ~ \411111111111,1,11111~lilitill W/ll#///11, 1 i///////// IUMNE Cash Fund New License Cash Fund Transfer Licenso TOTAL 2300-100 2310-100 (999) (999) A LE:]:Mil~ TOWN OF ESTES PARK RESOLUTION NO. 18-99 BEING A RESOLUTION SPONSORING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE LARIMER EMERGENCY TELEPHONE AUTHORITY IN THE COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK SHARING AGENCY. WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park is a member in good standing of the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA); and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park is likewise a signatory to the Intergovernmental Agreement which created the Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (LETA); and WHEREAS, LETA has applied for membership in CIRSA; and WHEREAS, such membership requires the sponsorship of a governmental entity currently a member of CIRSA; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Town agrees to sponsor LETA in connection with the Authority's pending membership application with CIRSA. 2. That the Town Clerk is hereby authorized to execute such documentation as may be required to evidence such sponsorship as reflected by this Resolution. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this day of , 1999. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Frey, Korb, Haggerty & Michaels, P.C. Attorneys at Law John p. Frey 318 Canyon Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 2283 June 23, 1999 rounrul" -6-@-fv [g-% Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-2283 Telephone (970) 493-8622 Fax (970) 493-1218 Ms. Vickie O'Connor Town Clerk Town of Estes Park P. O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Vickie: Re: Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority (LETA) - CIRSA Application We have spoken to Greg White concerning the inclusion of the enclosed resolution on the Estes Park Town Board agenda for July 13, 1999. Greg has approved the form of this resolution and asks that we send the original directly to you. The CIRSA Board has a special meeting set up by telephone conference call on July 15, 1999, to consider the LETA application and will need to have the signed resolution in hand at that time. Accordingly, it would be very helpful if you could make a note to fax us a copy of the signed resolution on July 14 so that we can forward it to CIRSA in time for the meeting of its board on July 15. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, FREY, KORB, HAGGERTY & MICHAELS, P.C. in - 0 L/4 .. / 4 F---, 0 jr 7/,1 0..(0 1(i- Â£ j 7 1' â€¢' 1 1 1 V 0 --/J J l1 John P. Frey Attorney for Larimer Emergency Telephone Authority jk enclosure cc Ms. Debbie Tellez, LETA Administrative Assistant 44&0 (13 A .C; i E U 0 AWARD OF FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT COUS-~12:721;2'it;'911231,~~~~4?Alliouj,f),40'2722UJU';5;NuossuyiyEL-TUCD~tzi 1 013!z DU 41 U i JOU 31133)8 1 1143!U,Ag?q)~7~rD)?filo~) DSUM)!lpt) 1;Un JUJUm.13,103 3504,Vt flilin l[13111Uij,102 0 1 01 p)11,!353*1 Sl JUAU OVIO 310301133 v *u 111od,Zi 3tp 511, jsaldat ptio spivpu D15 tu D.,Sold 01 3.131~pe 01 pljpnfut, silodat luouvulflv,luu v The Government Finance Officers Association OpEJ[OIOD ')[3[Ed salÂ·SE JO UMOIâ€¢ -Su l Jiodat l t,lou vu ljflu,tuuiJAC)S U ! pluttlD 35342!11 . 666I '92 XJ[Eniged presents this Finance Officer Monte L. 1013340 34.ltloax) 311'G of the United S .4 Â£,A A / TOWN OF ESTES PARK ' ABUL v COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1998 i.~ THE AUDITORS' REPORT OBJECTIVE To express an unqualified report on the financial condition of the Town. That the audit was performed in compliance with "Generally Accepted Auditing Standards". 1 .~t AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND AUDIT METHODS 'V Determine whether the Town's financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Determine if the Town complied with state laws and requirements y~ AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND AUDIT METHODS We documented the controls over the various financial functions such as payroll, receipts, disbursements, etc.. through internal control surveys and observation. We tested documentation by selecting transactions and analytical review. 2 THE AUDITORS' REPORT RESULTS V An unqualified report was rendered, with a scope limitation for Y2K. See page 11. INTERNAL CONTROL 4Â· The Town does not currently have any material weakness in its " internal control system", because: 1. Even though the Town has few employees involved in the accounting process there is a good segregation of duties, i.e.. between accounts payable, payroll, approval of expenditures, bank reconciliation's and the preparation of financial statements. 3 INTERNAL CONTROL 2. The Town Trustee's take an active role in Town management and exercises control over expenditures. luowN OF ESTES PARK GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE 1998 REVENUES 5% 0% Â·f* 4%~ f * OTaxes â€¢ Licenses & Permfits - Â«- -11/444Â»:aaa o Intergovernmental OCharges for services IFines o Interest â€¢Rent 6% ~ *~94Â¥';,f.k,a 4*ji*'3530 0 Miscellaneous ~!eFÂ·*: u,Â·9*S~fy \6&/5473*b,EL~*lag 4 OWN OF ESTES PARK GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE 1998 EXPENDITURES 8% **21*WÂ« A//////A 45*Migrfai:\ Â¤General Government â€¢ Public Safety *49~Â«Â©'ll -I~ti:Fl~ O Public Works 1 *te:Â£%4'99Â¥17 220&1>kÂ¢*Â¢27&~â‚¬3 OCulture & recreation 11% / ,~0*.*e?**f Vi......BAM....I i Intergovernmental OCapitaloutlay m Debt Service O Payment to Trustee 0% \ 13% 12% TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO c~OMPARATIVE COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS DECEMBER 31,1998,1997 AND 1996 4 (Totals Memorandum only) ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS 1998 1997 1996 Cash and cash equivalents 702,980 1,369,225 822,773 Investments 20,333,779 17,820,168 16,686,453 Receivables: Interest 25,866 45,894 18,874 Taxes 869,864 819,334 751,940 Accounts 652,996 764,827 702,806 Intergovernmental 109,940 119,228 89,335 Deferred Charges 63,693 0 0 Due from other funds 3,214,091 3,087,814 3,108,789 Inventories 520,215 444,958 444,818 Prepaid 0 0 21,380 Property, Plant and equ ipm ent - net of accumulated depreciation 39,727,904 36,742,026 33,622,650 Otherdebits: Am ount available in debt service fund 1,731,401 1,772,966 1,716,755 Amount to be provided for the paymentof long-term debt 5,683,193 6,558,882 5,607,677 TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS 73,635,922 69,545,322 63,594,250 5 TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO 2 COMPARATIVE COMBINED BALANCE SHEET - ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS .1 7 DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 t.JÂ·,r LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS Liabilities: Fund share of pooled cash - deficit 722,690 499,813 0 Accountd payable 766,884 835,019 839,548 Accrued expenses 121,125 353,342 287,235 Compensated absenses 318,456 311,382 299,761 Retainage payable 64,970 47,222 61,510 Due to other funds 3,214,091 3,087,814 3,108,789 Customer deposits 174,945 187,243 194,173 Customer advances for construction 357,570 307,034 295,345 Deferred reven ue 2,906,341 2,420,343 2,284,441 General obligation bonds payable 2,610,000 2,670,000 2,790,000 Capital leases payable 1,919,486 2,005,476 273,670 Revenue bonds payable 5,385,000 6,150,000 6,875,000 Deferred compensation payable 1,539,134 1,275,656 1,032,978 Special assessments payable 8,474 9,239 5,937 Total liabilities 20,109,166 20,159,583 18,348,387 COMPARATIVE COMBINED BALANCE SHEET -ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 Edi~d other credits: Inv*6-nent in general fixed assets 21,568,094 19,779,967 18,064,793 Contributed capital 5,261,587 4,729,134 4,373,940 Retained earnings: Reserved for: Future operations 1,039,392 1,022,793 976,310 Emergencies -TABOR 485,000 485,000 485,000 Catastrophic losses 1,034,415 953,395 868,202 Unreserved 17,671,554 16,708,567 15,238,041 Fund Balance: Reserved for: Future operations 2268917 1617578 1436399 Emergencies -TABOR 78529 74892 35103 Debt service 1731401 1772966 1716755 Prepaid items 0 0 21380 Long-term advances 0 0 12500 Beneficiary benefits 781163 0 0 Unreserved - undesignated 1606704 2241447 2017440 Total equity and other credits 53,526,756 49,385,739 45,245,863 TOTAL LIABILITIES, EQUITY AND OTHER CREDITS 73,635,922 69,545,322 63,594,250 vi-.ra TOWN OF ESTES PARK GOVERNMENTAL FUND EQUITY (1) Yearended December31 1998 1997 1996 REVENUES 6,418,716 5,992,365 5,434,206 EXPENDITURES 7,939,790 6,973,595 7,200,226 EXCESS EXPENDITURES (1,521,074) (981,230) (1,766,020) PROCEEDS FROM LEASES 805,502 510,425 82,535 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 2,360,530 2,169,902 2,039,798 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 958,895 1,033,048 959,585 Increase (Decrease) in Equity 686,063 666,049 (603,272) BEGINNING EQUITY 2,675,255 2,009,206 2,612,478 ENDING EQUITY 3,361,318 2,675,255 2,009,206 (1)Includes General, Special Events, Conservation Trust, Museum, Conference Center,Community Reinvestment, Open Space, and Senior Center Funds. TOWN OF ESTES PARK PROPRIETARY FUND EQUITY (1) i Yearended December 31 1998 1997 1996 Revenues 9,778,459 10,093,858 9,420,834 Expenses 8,075,369 7,990,269 7,661,978 Operating Income 1,703,090 2,103,589 1,758,856 Transfer to General Fund 645,738 622,745 600,780 Contributed Capital - Water 535,707 476,552 537,247 Increase in Equity 1,593,059 1,957,396 1,695,323 Beginning Equity 23,898,889 21,941,493 20,246,170 Ending Equity 25,491,948 23,898,889 21,941,493 (1) Includes Light & Power, Water, Fleet Maintenance, Catastrophic Loss and Health Insurance Funds. 7 TOWN OF ESTES PARK SELECTED EQUITY ACCOUNTS (1) Year ended December 31 1998 1997 1996 Property and Equipment Genetal government 21,566,094 19,779,967 18,064,793 Utility plant 18,159,810 16,962,059 15,557,857 Receivables 1,658,666 1,749,283 1,562,955 Inventories 520,215 444,958 444,818 Cash and investments General Funds 4,926,463 4,183,594 3,599,179 Special Revenue Funds 674,112 570,542 886,703 Enterprise & Internal Service Funds 8,727,618 10,030,844 8,921,925 Retirement plans 2,325,753 2,023,894 1,720,550 10/\NCFEES.Â« (33â‚¬1Â¥l.(nB~ENIA-IBENES,ElRIE USTTIENFISCA.M*6 UOETES (h,gS Are% Rlt Rscel Tacs all Irter- RT and Rmits g,Ernat21 SNoes 11*lest MsodlenBOLS Tda i $24381 $104ml $049 =-- $18~688 Wv[73 $31A797 $*82 1980 377%090 14Â¥il7 3,871 34315 34119 a227 42;798 1901 48~607 217,389 154&35 28337 97,684 5*113 4%975 1982 421R769 238~36 1,101â‚¬21 23~272 3646Ee 4%293 468*99 1983 4SA23; 30&436 518;413 29,00$ 431/2 5*11 M881770 1901 478~3 34781 94153 24085 S0M87 514101 7,314633 1986 510198 E,908 EV,381 *em 3[a772 484276 7,14981 1986 4388~1 34785 574210 301'122 317;016 5~972 7,4656 191 4614592 99188 87%419 24385 34123 0/475 8*488 1988 4017,(Ia 2*186 8452 428 388~911 681876 4841o 8 ' TDANCFESIEEFMK (ENâ„¢-WONVE,rED*EN]TUBEWRACIICN UEI-TENRELLYE*E alue 11*r- (hmi FUdic Reic ad (b*nnatel Q,iti [Ni R,rrels QMrmwt &*ty W,le; RI-icr Oats Qlley Ek,vioe ToT,ulae Tcti $121Â®1 $100121 $863188 $m,690 $52tl $0 $0 $0 $47821101 1537*14 10~98 77Q915 57;670 4337 0 E9221 O 560wt 91 15*18 IAM'05 515912 100*[8 10*32 O 1305884 0 7,04589 m 194714 1215905 474219 100â„¢ %2 0 'wast 0 484001 m 1601â‚¬07 1%409 67236 1*11088 23490 0 05780 0 46015 B, 152631 1431816 6201 10430 G3086 0 14438 O 4791511 96 16â€ž0 15392 9410 111~6 mID 822313 1131110 0 77586 196 179~93 1681918 106Â¥99 127400 37,â‚¬ID 16Aa33 LEOZ7 0 4787,GD i 17qlm 14/0 1131336 1E]131 5,000 2312433 12*007 0 966103 a 2475 194631 12Â§083 lE;773 37,â‚¬00 111Â¥23 1,Zate BAR/0 143706 9 8 814 U TOWN BOARD MEETING July 13, 1999 Action Item #2 - Amended Annexation Agreement for Wildfire Ridge. Greg White will present the Agreement at the meeting. /19 334#}4 1 TOWN OF ESTES PARK u-/' i -,4.07 Police Department *6Â»i42?21 ,Uit- <..',fi*2*. 9:jj; 4, 44 4% L z61 #Vt; 2- 'fup 6 pp,y h. /2:*Â£*A-kka iâ‚¬Â·r ~r'-94.92&422722-r ,-7/ 4 July 8, 1999 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Friar's Restaurant Hotel and Restaurant Ronald Schacher DOB: 09/21/44 Hubert Felden DOB: 09/07/64 Ms. O'Connor: An Estes Park local record check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There are no local records on the above-mentioned person(s). Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Friar' s Restaurant. Sincerely, AftÂ«- Gregg Filsinge Deputy Chief of Police (970) 586-4465 â€¢ R.O. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (970) 586-4496 DR 8404 (07/97) Page 1 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION COLORADO LIQUOR 1375 SHERMAN STREET OR 3.2% FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE DENVER CO 80261 RETAIL LICENSE APPLICATION ~1 NEW LICENSE ,~TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP Â¤ LICENSE RENEWAL â€¢ ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN â€¢ APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) â€¢ LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ â€¢ APPLICANT SHOULD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COLORADO LIQUOR AND BEER CODE(Call 303-321-4164) DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 1. Applicant is applying as a U Individual X Corporation U Limited Liability Company E Partnership (includes Limited Liability and Husband and Wife Partnerships) El Association or Other 2. Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation LUI LiZ>FN--DUJER CHEPS, LNC. 2a.Trade Name of Establishment (DBAL State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone 0923 AQLS 06<, EITAÂ·â‚¬-AAAâ‚¬T 40 10450 970 -4-26-Ayo 6 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) A 15-7 Cc . ELA 640'2-,U 144 E. City County, State ZIP Code 65-7-es /4,c 4-AA 1 M 252. C-8 L-D SOS1 1 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town State ZIP Code /050 S. Sm 0 RA, o AD E . 731 ESTES A,1-k CD 20Â£11 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following questions: Present Trade Name of Establkhment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Class of License Present Expiration Dflte 04+21 Aks MEÂ£1*u,ZANT 03 84(0:5%0000 Cl Ls too SECTION A APPLICATION FEES LIAB SECTION D LIQUOR LICENSE FEES -60 C] Late Renewal Application Fee ................................ $500.00 1940 Â¤ Retail Liquor Store License (city) ........................ $202.50 D Application Fee for New License .............................. 650.00 1940 0 Retail Liquor Store License (county) .....................287.50 0 0 Application Fee-New License Concurrent Review.... 750.00 1950 El Liquor Licensed Drugstore (city) .......................... 202.50 2310 0 Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership ............... 650.00 1950 0 Liquor Licensed Drugstore (county) .....................287.50 SECTION B 3.2% BEER LICENSE FEES 1960 0 Beer & Wine License (city)...................................326.25 2121 0 Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (city) ...................... $71.25 1960 0 Beer & Wine License (county).............................. 411.25 2121 0 Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (county) ................... 92.50 1970 <H & R License *@ty O county .........................475.00 2122 El Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (city) ........................ 71.25 1980 O H&R Licensew/opt Prem Clcity Clcounty......475.00 2122 E Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (county) ................... 92.50 1990 El Club License m city [lcounty.................,..........283.75 2123 Â¤ Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises-(city) _,...,..._..71.25 2010 Il Tavern License m city m county........................ 475.00 2123 El Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (county) .......,..... 92.50 2020 Â¤ Arts License m city O county.............................283.75 SECTION C RELATED FEES AND PERMITS 2030' D Racetrack License Clcity Clcounty ....................475.00 .$75.00 2040 0 Optional Premises License Â£ city 0 county...... 475.00 2210-100 (999) E Retail Warehouse Storage Permit 1980-100 (999) O Addition of Optional Premises to existing hotel/restaurant 1905 1 Retail Gaming Tavern Lic O city El county........ 475.00 $75.00 x 1975 0 Brew-Pub License 725.00 Total Fee 1970-750 (999) m Managers Registration (hotel & restaurant only) ...$75.00 C] Other No Fee 03.2% Beer On/Off Premises Only Delivery Permit No Fee (1 Retail Liquor Store Delivery Permit DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY LIABILITY INFORMATION County City Industry Type License Issued Through License Account Number Liability Date (Expiration Date) State City County Managers Reg @7 -750 (999) 2180-100 (999) 2190-100 (999) 1970-750 (999) gm, ~@@ 1 ji imi 1 j i ii i ii i ii 1 I EII I i Cash Fund Ne/ UcinGâ€¢ :.1 C- Fund Tranâ€¢fir Lkinse TOTAL: _ 2300-100 4 2310-100, (999) . 4. (999) . 11 DR 8404 (07/97) Page 3 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stock- Yes No holders or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? C],0000 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation) or manager ever (in Colorado or any other state); (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? C]y (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 0,8 (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 0121 If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8a. Has a liquor license application (same license class), that was located within 500 feet of the proposed premises, been denied within the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. 00 8b. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been denied within the preceding one year? If yes," explain in detail. m m 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or private school that meets compulsory education requirements of 00 Colorado law, or the principal campus of any college, university or seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any El 32'000 current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 2 of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that this license will be issued by virtue of ownership, lease or other arrangement? /E, El D Ownership m Lease O Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landtord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Landlord Tenant Expires Attach a diagram and outline the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, brewery, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11".(Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who, besides the owners listed in this application (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies), will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME DATE OF BIRTH FEIN OR SSN INTEREST Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement, or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc.) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises Yes No A local ordinance or resolution authorizing optional premises has been adopted. D El Number of separate Optional Premises areas reqi ieqtpri 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. m El 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and 00 not for pecuniary gain? (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is 00 operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? (Three years required) 16. Brew-Pub License Applicants answer the following: (a) Has the applicant received or applied for a Federal Brewers Notice? 00 (Copy of notice or application must be attached) Date of Birth Hotel & Restr. Lic. 17a. Name of Manager (If this is an application for a Hotel Yes No and Restaurant License, the manager must also submit an Individual History Record (DR 8404-I). 0 0 17b. Does this manager act as the manager of, or have a financial interest in, any other liquor Yes No licensed establishment in the State of Colorado? If yes, provide name, type of license and account number. 0 18. Tax Distraint Information. Does the applicant or any other person listed on this application and including its partners, officers, Yes directors, stockholders, members (LLC) or managing members (LLC) and any other persons with a 10% or greater financial interest El m ~ in the applicant currently have an outstanding tax distraint issued to them by the Colorado Department of Revenue? If yes, provide an explanation and include copies of any payment agreements. DR 8404 (07/97) Page 4 |19. If applicant is a corporation, partnership, association or a limited liability company, it is required to list by position all officers and directors, general partners, managing members, all stockholders, partners (including limited partners) and members who have a 10% or greater financial interest in the applicant. All persons listed here or by attachment must submit and attach a DR 8404-I (Individual History Record) and provide fingerprint cards to their local licensing authority. DATE OF NAME HOME ADDRESS, CITY & STATE POSITION % OWNED BIRTH lose S <61. VAA-1 h) AV E D\ CLULE:*Z. -ROWALe L.&-cAAe,+ 262- 29722 /PA,2,c, 60. 605,-7 96/444â€¢412-p GU l4 2/17 te/52- citefAWA y LAN E O/0420- 5*Wal ES-Tirs Â»RK, 47, 52) 5,1 9 |7 ~G:+ PAGS;ParT ~0 Additional Documents to be submitted by type of entity a~ORPORATION ~ Cert. of Incorp. El Cert. of Good Standing (if more than 2 yrs. old) ~ Cert. of Auth. (if a foreign corp.) ~ PARTNERSHIP ~ Partnership Agreement (General or Limited) ~ Husband and Wife partnership (no written agreement) ~ LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ~ Articles of Organization El Cert. of Authority (if foreign company) U Operating Agrmt. ~ ASSOCIATION OR OTHER Attach copy of agreements creating association or relationship between the parties Begiftered Agent Of applicab!21- Address for Service LO SO S. S>T. UAJW,J AKE- t> 1 |4%ALD L. be#AcM e:2. 45725 2402&, 0, 20Â£/7 OATH OF APPLICANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete o the best of my knowledge. I also acknowledge that it is my responsibility and the responsibility of my agents and employees o comply with the provisions of the Coloradd Liquor or Beer Code which affect my license. A,IfyiJd Signaturer h / r /7 /7 Title Date 60/ 1Autu.&6 -l~-3<J<. Sa.>r -72234 S DWA; 252. Gla M REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY/COUNTY) Date application filed with local authority Date of local authority hearing (for new license applicants; cannot be less than 30 days from date of application 12-47-311 (1Â» C.R.S. Each person required to file DR 8404-1: Yes No a. Has been fingerprinted 0 0 b. Background investigation and NCIC and CCIC check for outstanding warrants conducted m El c. The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. El 0 If "no", the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and characterof the applicantare satisfactory. Wedo reportthatsuch license, if granted, will meetthe reasonable requirements of the neighborhoodand thedesires of theadultinhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority for Telephone Number Il TOWN, CITY El COUNTY Signature Title Date ignature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk,Â· if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and tfie clerkto the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. DR 8404-1 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history recordprovides basic information which isnecessary forthe licensingauthorities investigation. ALLquestions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name ofâ€žBusiness Da&Afl 99 Social Security Number(s) 601 6-:0#flao eA, C)+66~s . Aic, 102 - 46 - 52)6 1 2. Your Full Nars(!ast, first, middle) 3. Alsalloown As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) be-#4-Ackler:K , 720,JA dz> C EE Ro Al 4. Mailing Address (if different from residence) Home Telephone 970 977 -/39 9 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) LDS[) S . ST O AA-l J AW a . 'b 1 6-TE. 31Â», 4. 20Â£ 1 -7 6. Date of ainh , Place of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? Q 9 /21 1 44 Â£>162,4 Anct<, Aj ' 23 [XYes El No If Naturalized, state where When Name of U.S. District Court Naturalization Cerlificate Number Date of Cer'tificate 11 an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9 Do You Have a current Driver's License? If ves, give number, & state 1 (00 Dk Â£ a 2,Â« AA (/O j~'Yes UNo Chlel 9 4â‚¬zs s-O 220 Name of Present Emplg,(el 11. Type of Business or Employment -7f-t E 1 OA ~A A (DE ~A-2. 0 62-T c Rj (C, 2.1.103 G. OF: ~d B N A 4, E 12. Address of Business_Where Employed (street numbar, city, state, ZIP) Dew V exe, Business Telephone 4120 /8/2.i b,4---QX) dE) u.O A 23 43 / stDZ:-1 6 3#3 29 5 - 92?OR 13. Present Position U Â·- P - 21 04'oce 14. Marital Statui 15. Name Qf Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) Â£04 CL_AR, <LE K. SCA/404 632 16. Spouse's Igate of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth to 1 -7 1 42_ Ld A-AA-TOK), 73< , 17. Spouse's residence Bildress, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) CullIAA E 18. Spouse'g Ftesent Employer Occupation l...telu E lu A-fcal 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER NOk)E lo you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail E] Yes EK'o 1 - CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you everbeen convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal ormilitarycourt? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your driver's license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) I f yes, explain in detail. A/ EJ Yes A No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. E Yes AXIo 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO 10 50 S . 0-7-, VAAi J NO a . T) \ 69-TE& geR, Co EDâ‚¬/-7 //99 9%Â£r-arr /792 5, /AGOSA (i),1 0 /42*AÂ©RA, 63. 870\7 4)/36 j /99 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO Diweae -DANA BE Glatey-rroo (0. 4-) 20&) 647041 93Â£j,o 41 25&6 U. 9.(Sio 3~53 A-g:,a,-r 27. What is your relation*p to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) Gotu' CkfiLEK g-Â·ri; GL-AD f D al liA AN A GER 28. If stockholder, number EDhare@ 9wned beneficially or of record ~ Percent of outstanding stock owned 2,0 643 - SID % 29. If partner, state whether E General D Limited Percent of Partnership Owned It Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, ser'vices or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount $* SDI 000 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, Ul W|lu kilt: rall uwnens uf baid accuutil. (Allach Cupieb uf all yuu, ilule,N12nW 9'6AMBEgjM&'b/~MA ~t*-can ness4 moun s Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account $ <r- n '4 6 Â£:EAA; ARDS 3 0 4 01) 730 AJA LD SC-/4,1 Crl al t<O k]Ar LO Scu,4-AC_A E*2, UU \-T ED A) ALLEy *ANK 14-46 20.-r PEU) (230 $ t(Dc OOD 4~-7-22% MAe<i Co. 1kcaNA LD Se-/+ACA ER $ $ Oath of Applicant I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authdfizell signature Title Date O *la -L &/4.).1 Sarl- 01 ERS O UN 82- *A /99 DR 8404-1 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history recordprovides basic information which isnecessary forthelicensing authorities investigation. ALLquestions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Busivess . ~ Date Social Security Number(s) Wil cl flo ivel- Cke k . inc, 06-15-99 601-46-5-363 2. YourÂ£Â£Name (las(Jirst, middle) 0 l 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) 1 f ( c( e- m ' (4 0, 6 ew + /fit.62 4. Mailing Address (if different frdm residence) Home Telephone / O -4 1 fc. i t Vt/ CL (4 L n â‚¬\70 -576- /695 5. ResiAence Address (street and number, city, state,ZIP) F 54-0~ F&. L i C 0 , 209 17 6. Date of Birth Place of Birtri , 7. U.S. Citizen? Aa 1 09-01-64 (Â» mcin g 1 bitte,3le h J Yes Â® No If Naturalized, state where When Name of U.S. District Court Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate If an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number A 02956411 2 Ves 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Driver's License? If yes, give,Aumber, & state 5' 1 l FFP DK- ER 14Â«,el AA W N Yes E\No C'..n(O 96-120-0294' . Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment Olvmplic *0404 Lodge K e S +00 4.rCLA 1< 12. Address 0(Businbss Where Employed (street number, city,â€¢state, ZIP) Business Telephone 9.7-0- s 96-2/4/ 13. Present Position AC ut n Ckel 14. Marital Stat~< Ea-r- beer 1 4 0 /dâ‚¬ /1 10klame of Spouse (include maiden namtiLEallicable) 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth 02-04- CK 6 ea- m an u 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) j S R M E 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation 6/0 m e In Cl i f-1- 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER Non.L Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail CJ Yes Â® No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Haveyou everbeen convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, de ferred sentence, or forfeited bail foranyoffense in criminalormilitarycourt? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your driver's license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) I f yes, explain in detail. CJ Yes Â© No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, orbeen denied a liquororbeer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. U Yes Â®1 No 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO i n -7 3 ari- ' 10 0 k TO. (* W GUI Z. A , Est-cs 1-r l-,: CO. 905* 01-90 Proser:4 .37-9 L; 44 ffeare, Pr Estes -Rak C O. Pos-c-7 13-96 G-37 3 933- 3<ince l.clne Del /Fow, d>R:310-1-5 (641 02-39 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO Dn .46 + 1(0Â£4 kv /(fiz 04 2 0. lot 5 4 7- Ef CO (Ad 08Â·-32 FA Â»-1 0 -- J Atlj, tornflouttol C fq, 0778Â¥ 07-92 4 \4 6 A M,ec,(t u1. W. 9,61 /140Â¥(Li-Ar Gvt E.F. CO Well it, 0%-36 04-9 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, panner, corp~a~ off~r,~re~to~~t~~~der, member or manager) /lA.eti.ir,, , ew- 28. If stockholder, number of shafes owned I*Afficially or of record Percent of outstanding stÂ¢ck owned 4 070 29. If partner, state whether Â£ General U Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount $ , 00.000 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, ul whu ate rail uwtle'b of bdid account. (Allach Cupieb ur Ull yuu' iluleNUnly 9%71 MuliM&'b/Bbgth #W#-can ness4 moun s Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account $ (00.000 Es 40% Po,V k ( JO 0, 70 9 1 -1- Ronal d ctfun Ae.r ell nifed Fatteq bum le Hu6 1-4 -*ele fen $ $ $ Oath of Applicant I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title ~ip,p.15-1~C C /OVZ ?'~ - t:j~1v 11 tl/ 06-25-89 Date 14+9934 Fire Department Employee Research Team Initiated with visit to Fire Department meeting early in the year. /- S--99 1. Committee of three firefighters and two Town reps 2. Meetings to outline issues 3. Meeting with fire administrator 4. Meetings with three fire chiefs 5. Solicit feedback from volunteers 6. Collected data on job descriptions 7. Drafted Chiefjob description 8. Solicited feedback from volunteers 9. Ratification ofjob description on 7/5/99