Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PACKET Town Board 1999-05-25
1 1, Prepared 5/19/99 *Revised 5/20/99 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, May 25,1999 7:00 p.m. AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated May 11, 1999. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, May 13, 1999 - Approval of: 1. 1999 Electric Rate Study Scope of Services - M.E. Kiburz and Associates, $12,500. 2. Joint Use Pole Audit - DCP Consulting, $60,000 B. Public Works, May 20, 1999 - Retroactive Approval of: 1. Purchase of 3 CBT Water Rights Units, $11,850 4. Special Event 3.2 Beer Permit filed by the Estes Park Lions Club, State Firemen's Convention, June 24 and 25, 1999, 1209 Manford Avenue. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Friends of Stanley Hall Agreement - Approval. *2. White Meadow View Place - Ordinance #6-99 Vacating Right-of-Way Easement. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 1. CIRSA Loss Control Audit 2. Sales Tax Report 3. Senior Center Memorial for Bill Marshall NOTE: The June 22, 1999 Town Board Meeting has been cancelled pursuant to scheduling conflicts. BRADFORDPUBLISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee May 13, 1999 Committee: Chairman Hix, Trustees Barker and Jeffrey Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Light and Power Director Matzke, Assistant to the Light and Power Director Mangelsen, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Trustee Barker called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. Fall River Hvdro Laboratory Proposal Presentation. For information purposes, Dr. Richard Smart presented a report on the Fall River Hydro Laboratory project covering the facility, project opportunities, funding, and project stages and status. Bill Emstie of Platte River Power Authority noted that there are five other historic plants currently in operation and that this project could provide information on the environmental impacts from small hydro facilities. Areas of discussion included the project timeline, water issues, maintenance costs/subsidizes, and safety issues. Dr. Smart was commended on his vision and presentation of the project. 1999 Electric Rate Study - Approve Engineering Scope of Services and Agreement Director Matzke reported that the last electric rate study for the Light and Power Department was done in 1993 and the rates recommended in that study remain in effect with a few minor changes that were implemented over time. Max Kiburz of M.E. Kiburz and Associates has performed all of the department's rate work since 1991 and most recently completed the Long- Range Financial plan that was adopted by the Town Board in January 1998. Director Matzke presented a proposed list of issues to be addressed in the 1999 Electric Rate Study and noted that the Light and Power Department requested $15,000 in the 1999 Budget for an electric rate study. The Committee recommends that the Scope of Services be approved and that M.E. Kiburz and Associates be engaged to perform the 1999 Electric Rate Study at an estimated cost of $12,500. Joint Use Poles Audit - Request Approval Director Matzke reported that the Light and Power Department has joint use agreements with U.S. West and cable television for one utility to attach facilities to poles owned by the other utility. U.S. West is currently billed for approximately 5700 attachments and cable television for approximately 1800 attachments to Town owned poles. These numbers have not been verified in recent history. The Light and Power Department received a proposal from DCP Consulting to perform a pole audit for all joint use poles at a cost of $8.25 per pole. The proposed audit would include a complete audit of both cable television and telephone attachments to Town owned poles, an updated set of maps with pole locations, and detailed summary sheets of the audit maps. The project would also include a complete audit of measured and non-measured violations. Measured violations are clearance problems over streets, driveways, and private property. Non-measured violations include illegal attachments to anchors, missing anchors, repairs needed, etc. The Light and Power Department requested $60,000 in the 1999 Budget to perform the joint use pole audit. The Committee recommends that DCP Consulting be hired to perform the joint use pole audit at a cost of $8.25 per joint use pole, up to the Budget amount of $60,000. If additional poles are identified that need to be included in the audit, further action by the Light and Power Committee would be required. REPORTS Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) Report: Director Matzke reported that Brian Moeck was recently hired as the General Manager of PRPA and the newly elected Board of Directors for PRPA include Ralph Mullinix/Chairman, Michael B. Smith/Vice-Chairman, Leona BRADFORO PUBLISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee, May 13, 1999 - Page 2 Stoecker/Secretary, and Kathy Gilliland/Treasurer. Items discussed at the April meeting include the Load and Resource Study, and additional generation sources. The annual reports for PRPA were distributed. Financial Report: The income statement and graphs for April was distributed. Monthly energy purchases continue to outpace previous years. Project Updates: The Pine Valley Three Phase Conversion should be completed soon. The routing issues with landowners have been resolved. Bidding for the switchgear at the Estes Substation is underway. Light and Power staff and Rocky Mountain Consultants (RMC) are reviewing feeder routes and RMC is preparing a legal description for the Bureau of Reclamation permit. There being no further business, Trustee Barker adjourned the meeting at 9:10 a.m. A / -bkil/clit„91&2.L< 6Lbco.~« Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk I.A.FOROPUBLISHING.O. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee May 20, 1999 Committee: Chairman Baudek, Trustees Barker and Jeffrey Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Public Works Director Linnane, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent None Chairman Baudek called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Municipal Building Phone Service Upgrade. Continued to June meeting. Purchase of 3 CBT Water Rights Units - Retroactive Approval. Director Linnane reported that due to the high rate of growth in the Front Range, CBT water rights units are being purchased almost as fast as they hit the marketplace. Several water brokers in the area have informed staff that the supply and demand of CBT units has caused the market value to increase from approximately $2,000 per unit in 1997 and 1998, to the current value of approximately $4,000 per unit. Additional discussions with personnel at the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) and with the River Commissioner indicate that if the building industry in the Front Range does not drastically taper off, the CBT market value may not decrease in the near future. Director Linnane and Town Attorney Greg White believe it is necessary that the Town take a proactive approach to CBT water rights purchases. The Town's current supply of water rights is projected to be adequate through the next 10 to 15 years. However, since the CBT unit market value is not expected to decrease in the near future, staff recommends increasing the water rights supply as CBT units become available. Since $50,000 was budgeted in 1999 Attorney White recommended that staff proceed with a purchase of three CBT units, at a cost of $3,950 per unit totaling $11,850. The 3 units became available approximately 3 weeks prior to the Public Works Committee meeting and it was necessary to enter into a contract for the purchase at that time. The Committee also recommended a Town policy whereas the Town could proceed, prior to formal Committee approval, with future CBT unit purchases as units become available. The Committee recommends retroactive approval of the $11,850 CBT units purchase as recommended above. REPORTS. The Customer Service Response Report for April 1999 was reviewed. Accountable Water Report Update. John Gallagher from Black and Veatch presented a report and slide presentation on the Water Accountability Study. Areas discussed include compensated/uncompensated/unaccounted-for water usage, percent of accountable usage, fiscal impacts, and study recommendations. Mr. Gallagher credited the Town on the increase of accountable water from approximately 74% in 1996 to 85% in 1998. He did make specific recommendations that would assist the Town in sustaining the 1998 accountable water percentage. Aerial Mapping Project - The letter from Aero-Metric was reviewed. There being no further business, Chairman Baudek adjourned the meeting at 4:10 p.m. heva»,POUJUE Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk DR 8439 (06/97) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION APPLICATION FOR A 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (303) 205-2300 IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT, YOU MUST BE NONPROFIT AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING (See back for details.) ./ CHECK ONE: C]SOCIAL NCHARTERED BRANCH, LODGE OR CHAPTER OF A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OR SOCIETY DFRATERNAL C] RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION ~PATRIOTIC EPHILANTHROPIC INSTiTUTION ~POLITICAL ~ POLITICAL CANDIDATE ~ATHLETIC EMUNICIPALITY OWNING ARTS FACILITIES DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE LIAB TYPE OF SPECIAL EVENT APPLICANT IS APPLYING FOR: DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 2110 m MALL VINOUS AND SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR $25.00 PER DAY LIQUOR PERMIT NUMBER 2170~ FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE (3.2 Beer) $10.00 PER DAY 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDtDATE State Sales Tax Number (Required) ESTak PARK £/0/ff CLU 6 O 3 -2/096 2. MAILING ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE 3. ADDRESS OF PLACE TO HAVE SPECIAL EVENT (include street, city/town and ZIP) (include street, cityhown and ZIP) A/ P o, 8.a 20/6 J a 0 Cl K /1 tur ca 0 , r Vt 6.%725 PA/Vi , co, 905/7 6%7 5% PA.AA,Cc . 5697 NAME DATE OF BIRTH HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, State, ZIP) PHONE NUMBER 4. PRES./SEC'Y OF ORG. or POLITICAL CANDIDATE /6 4( -ELAM,eviL LAME D e Al ALA A O U N 6 G 3 7 632 EXTes YARK, Co , 44 e. FI 7 9 70 -5 sc.6553 5. EVENT MANAGER 1-9.5 6 ADDLe 8/lea /-4,<·: GAAY 4#ARAFELT 1/-5- Lib ES'?-s FWAR.( 0- %05/7 ~170-586'7@12 6. HAS APPLIdANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE BEEN 7. IS PREMISES NOW LICENSED UNDER STATE LIQUOR OR BEER CODE? ISSUED A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT THIS CALENDAR YEAR? E 37-ws p Aft<L D NO El YES HOW MANY DAYS? ~ NO ~ YES TO WHOM? £/O 43 Cke g 8. DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE POSSESSION OR WRITTEN PERMISSION FOR THE USE OF THE PREMISES TO BE LICENSED? 0Yes O No .' 1 7 LIST BELOWTHE EXACT DATE(S) FOR WHICH APPLICATION IS BEING MADE FOR PERM[T 1, ~ ~ 4, '~ ' 11. ,- Date 6*97_ 99 Date "25- 79 Date Date Date Hours From 8 ; M 0- m. Hours Frorng;©e ~ .m Hours From .m. Hours From .m. Hours From To 670< C -m. To .m. To .m. To OATH OF APPLICANT ' - ' - - :'*-7-1 ' "r, 1 ' 4 .fl . - f.. 0.. 1 declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachmeqts thereto, and -. thatall informati99.!pereinistrue, correct, and complete tothebestofmy knowledge. .-' A SIGNATUR<Q""T~~'~~'/4„,/~257 ~5'C- /, . TITLE,1 - D T DATE g 9%3*k--0 . - ct-1-92 8 'JKLUU 430 s-/4 11 49..... Ah=POR«ND APPROVAL ~~ LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) T~@~going ~on 1%20@en examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satisfactor~, 41 w, do rep~~at sucht~errEit, if granted, will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 48, C.R.S., as amended. -. -A. fof THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Cr• LoaUitbFNS,4- -~----'-'-'FORCOUNTY) % CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER OF CITY/COUNTY CLERK %3*:2 ·k 6 COUNTY (970) 586-5331 X-3/02-j SIGNA T(,8, 4) / TITLE DATE 5 A 2,2.1 "ll/f M 14 or 1149 1,rrimiri· in ' 4>50«~'-6.„,<,0 i DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTM~NT OF REVENUE USE ONLY LIABILITY INFORMATION r 1. f -. Liense ACEount Number ~ Liability Date State ~· TOTAL . i: - -750 (999) (Instructions on Reverse Size) EE 391i:4*AE! -. -1 ,\ 7.0./.J'.J~ 1 A.:4- 1 I W il 6 , 1.-f;>4a,1* 1 V' 13 1 0% 95 4 7 4--71% X . 31*11 1/k 2 0 '7. 1 , 12 *00 *i . 'O 4- 4 ~*tfa >100180 - I . 1 6 -- tt~~ .1 1 ... 'ki 10 '_*1*1*-1 -I ~J., - . :t . . , .lt.,1 l 2 ME i j 'Wzi. .... :E 171 4 0 I. ke. . 11~4 I. ..1, LA>.*4.==.L·~~·.··~ .- . /; 2.U.6 0' rs' 4,21<$; 1 ... 03 ,....1 , ~ ,>41...%·IA-#i /·.i.*' 61] !44 4 9 ' 7 O-05 i i f {1% X COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this __ day of '1999 by and between the Town of Estes Park, a Municipal Corporation ("the Town") and the Friends of Stanley Hall, Inc., a Colorado non-profit corporation, C'FOSH"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Town entered into a lease agreement dated Much 11, 1997 ("the Lease") between New Stanley L.P. ("the Stanley") as landtord and the Town as tenant, a copy is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the tetrns and conditions of the Lease provide that the Stanley and the Town, in conjunction with the Colorado Histotical Society, conttibute certain monies ft>r needed improvements to the premises as more fully set forth in the lease; and WHEREAS, FOSH was formed and incorporated for the purpose of raising additional funds for the further restoration and renovation of Stanley Hall above and beyond those improvements contemplated in the Lease; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to set forth each parties responsibility with regard to the restoiation and renovation of Stanley Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE RECITATIONS AND FOR OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOILOWS: l. FOSH has contracted with Bruce McMillan, AIA, Architects, P.A. of Manhattan, Kansas, pursuant to an agreement datedJune 23, 1998 for design development services for Stanley Hall. The design development drawings have been accepted by FOSH. 2. The Town shall attempt to negotiate an amended lease agreement with the St•ritey which incorporates the design development plan into an amended lease. The Town also shall attempt to increase the length of the Lease from 50 to a 100 year annual lease agreement 3. In the event the Town is unable to negotiate and execute an amended lease with the Stanley, this Agreement between FOSH and the Town shall terminate or the paxties shall amend this Agreement. 4. In the event the Town obtains a lease amendment incorporating the design development drawings and any other necessary provisions, the parties agree that they shall proceed as follows a. The Town shall contract for and FOSH shall finance construction drawings based upon the design development drawings for the entire renovation. During the prepantion of the construction drawings, FOSH shall develop a phasing for the restoration and renovation of Stanley Hall ("the Project") in conjunction with the Town end the architect. All cost for developing the Project shall be that of FOSH including dl architectural and consulling fees. Each phase of the Project shall be designed, constfucted and occupied as a separate Project without the need or obligation to construct any other phase of the Project As an addendum to this Agreement, the phased development schedule for the project and a copy of the lease amendment shall be attached. b. It shall be the responsibility of FOSH to finance the consttuction drawings and bid packets of each individual phase of the Project. The Town shall contiact with an appropriate party for production of bid packets and bid review. c. Prior to the bidding of each phase of the Ptoject, POSH shall have raised and collected sufficient funds excluding Town funds, if any, for the construction of the individual phase including, but not lirnited to all architectuial, construction management, labor, materials, fees and contingencies. In the event the Town appropriates any funds for any phase, said funds shall be listed ind specified in the development schedule fof each phase. FOSH shall notify the Town in writing of its completion of allprerequisites to the bidding for each construction phase d. Upon receipt of written notice fiom FOSH of the readiness of a constiuction phase, the Town shall bid; and if the bids are within the estimated construction costs, the Town, in its sole discretion, may enter into appropiiate construction contracts. It shall be in the sole discretion of the Town whether to bid the individual phase or to contract with an appropdate construction firm for each individual phase. e. During the construction of each individual phase, it shall be the solc responsibility of the Town, as the contracting party, to determine the adequacy of the perfofmance of allparties according to the constnlction contract documents. 2 £ Upon execution of the construction contracts, FOSH shall deposit with the Town the amount necessary to pay for the completion of that phase of the construction pursuant to the conttact costs. Said funds shall include the appropriate contingency figure agreed to by the Town and FOSH. The Town shall place said funds in a separate interest beacing account for use in the construction of the individual phase. All interest accrued on said account shall be returned to the account. At the end of each individual phase of construction and payment of all costs of said construction, any temaining funds shall be returned to FOSH. During the time a separate account is in existence, the Town shall provide FOSH with a monthly accounting of the account. g. In the event of change orders which cause the construc~on cost to exceed the amount deposited, FOSH shlll deposit into the separate account the amount necessity to pays,id change order within thifty (30) days of the Town submitting the wtitten change order to FOSH. If the aggregate amount of all change orders exceeds the contingency figure for the particular phase, the Town shall not execute any future change orders without the prior wzitten approval by FOSH unless the Town elects to be Enancially tesponsible for said change orders. h. After the compledon of all phases of the Project or those phases in which money has been faised by FOSH and const,uction completed, Stanley Hall shall be operated by the Town pursuant to the terms of the Lease, any amendment thereto, and a fiture agreement with FOSH, if applicable. 5. FUTURE AGREEMENT. FOSH and the Town agree to develop on or before Decembet 1, 1999, an agreement with zegard to the establishment of a maintenance fund for Stanley Hall following completion of the first phase of the Project The parties shall also develop as paft of the agreement an operational pfogram for Stanley Hallfollowing completion of phase 1 of the Project. This Agreement shall include sources for maintenance and operational funds for St,nley Hall following the completion of phase 1 of the Project including maintenance and operational concerns fot all fiture phases of the renovation of the Project. 6. FAILURE OF PERFORMANCE. In the event eit}let patty Ails to perform any of its xesponsibilities under the terms and conditions heteof, the other party shall give the non-performing pafty ten (10) days notice in wdling of said non-performance. If said non-performance is not cured within said ten (10) day period tile other party may terminate this Agreement and may recover such damages as ingy be proper, of may elect to treat this Agreement as being in full force and effect and shall have the right to specific puformance ind/of damages. 7. NOTICE. All notices, demands or other documents required of desired to be given, made or sent to either party, under this Agreement shall be in wciting, shall be 3 deemed cffecdve upon mailing or personal delivery. If mailed, said notice shall be mailed, postage prepaid as follows: FOSH TOWN OF ESTES PARK C/O BENNETT PENN PO BOX 1200 631 MEEKER DRIVE ESTES PARK, CO 80517 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 8. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and shall be amended by the parties only by wzitten document executed by tbe parties. 9. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, theii respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set theif hands the day and year first above written: F** s€*7nc- V ATTEST: /4+14 -tk seant=ty 72 0401 vKAe TOWN OF ESTES PARK Br. Robert D. Dekker, Mayor A'ITEST: Town Clerk 4 ORDINANCE NO. 6-99 AN ORDINANCE VACATING RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LAYING AND MAINTAINING WATER AND SEWER LINES EASEMENT WHEREAS, the owner ofpropetty subject to the right-of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements has requested that the Town vacate the right-of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements as the owners have granted a new right-of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements; and WHEREAS, there is no longer any necessity to have the right-of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements proposed to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees ofthe Town of Estes Park has determined that it is in the best interests ofthe Town to permanently abandon and vacate these right-of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. Section 1: The Board of Trustees of the Town ofEstes Park, Colorado hereby vacates the right-of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements as follows: Right of way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines was granted to the Town of Estes Park by recorded plat of White Mcadow View Place addition to the Town of Estes Park by instrument recorded June 10, 1938 in Plat Book 5 and page 33, in which the specific location ofthe easement is not defined. Section 2: The Town surrenders any and all right, title and interest to the vacated right- of-way for laying and maintaining water and sewer lines easements. Section 3: The adoption ofthis ordinance is hereby determined to be declared an emergency due to the fact that it is necessary to immediately grant the Vacating Easement; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees an emergency exists, this ordinance shall take effect and be enforced immediately after its passage, adoption and signature ofthe Mayor. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO TH[S DAY OF ,1999. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 52 2 C. 51 "Im a. E 2 E a- PE ~3 82 & e a. E 2 2 0 E 33ifi 050 . OZO MONTH 1992 1993 % Change 1994 % Change 1995 % 1996 % Change 1997 % Change 1998 % Change 1999 % Change January 141,270 145,635 3.09% 160,651 10.31% 151,629 -5.62% 162,775 7.35% 173,414 6.54% 221,731 27.86% 219,615 -0.95% February 146,106 143,084 -2.07% 178,663 24.87% 203,979 14.17% 172,433 -15.47% 214,301 24.28% 216,038 0.81% 246,150 13.94% 180,591 195,477 8.24% 218,480 11.77% 226,199 3.53% 224,965 -0.55% 227,601 1.17% 272,203 19.60% 282,663 3.84% %179 969*ZI %ZL'* %0LE %00'Z 969/ 1 1 %*6.* 81*'8+L ZBE'£8£'9 LSZ'LBL'* 929'LLS't, 899'8017'* 6ZE'ZEE'* 1£8'*88'E OCO'ZOL'E 170,178 169,924 -0.15% 196,104 15.41% 212,103 8.16% 194,650 -8.23% 205,841 5.75% 264,186 28.34% 258,861 270,722 4.58% 302,968 11.91% 297,381 -1.84% 341,826 14.95% 362,036 5.91% 374,411 3.4296 470,100 489,638 4.16% 535,491 9.36% 542,292 1.27% 569,949 5.10% 580,200 1.8096 649,522 11.95% 565,744 592,147 4.67% 629,833 6.36% 691,855 9.85% 743,048 7.40% 785,123 5.66% 855,485 8.96% August 591,899 575,406 -2.79% 629,507 9.40% 636,336 1.08% 764,138 20.08% 815,371 6.70% 788,676 -3.27% %Z6'IZ 91.'9£9 %29~Z- 886'£99 %*0'6- 0££'899 %99 6- 1*8'*Z9 %9661 889'169 %09'8 8£S'9LS 188'0£9 Jequ,eldes %EZ'64 L£6'OL* %98'0 8LS'91E %Zg'*- St6'Zte %LL' t Z tEl'6ZE %99'L CS*'*GE %69-EL 09£'EZZ 96L'0*Z %L69 Le L'08Z %LL'6 1 Lt'*91 %16'*1 988'0*Z %02'0 909'60Z %090l- 86 L'60Z %*LO* 100'*EZ OLZ'99 1 Jeqw % LL-8 169'•LE %96'17 Z8£'68Z %991- ZIL'SLZ %16*Z 91£'881 %66'SZ 46Z'SLZ %0Lg- 809.8 11 SE€'6£Z Prev. Year Prev. Year Prev. Year LENS LAXESR~EVSEN~ES 5 . Prepared 5/5/99 *Revised 5/6/99 **Revised 5/11/99 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, May 11,1999 7:00 p.m. AGENDA Introduction of new Police Officers - Assistant Town Administrator Repola Presentation to Board of Trustees by Don Tebow/Sr. Center PUBLIC COMMENT: TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: 1. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated April 27,1999. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, May 6, 1999 - Approval of: 1. Police Department a. Copier, Minolta CS PRO 2080, $7,393 2. Fire Department a. Memorandum of Understanding with PRPA 4. Estes Park Planning Commission, April 20,1999 (acknowledgement only) Mayor: Open the public hearing and ask if there are any persons desiring to speak on the following plat. If not, it will remain on the Consent Calendar: *5. Amended Plat and Rezoning of Tract 69, Fall River Addition, Rocky Mountain National Park Associates, Curt Buchholtz/applicant. *Continue to June 8, 1999. 6. Final Plat, Dill Subdivision, Rick & Cathy Dill/applicant. 7. Amended Plat, Lot 1, Prosser Subdivision, Anthony Paglia/applicant. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Trustee Vacancy - Appointment - Mayor Dekker 2. Wildfire Ridge Presentation - Request consideration of modification of Annexation Agreement - Peter & Ricki Ingersoll/Pinnacle Homes & Design. 3. Public Hearing - Ordinance #5-99 Adopting the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition - Light & Power Director Matzke. **4. Estes Valley Development Code - Citizen Petitions - Mayor Dekker/Community Development Director Stamey. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 1. 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Mayor Dekker requests authorization to enter Executive Session to discuss Contract Negotiations, EPURA Commissioners will be attending. Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, April 27, 1999 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 27th day of April, 1999. Meeting called to order by Mayor Robert L. Dekker. Present: Robert L. Dekker, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker John Baudek George J. Hix Lori Jeffrey Also Present: Assistant Town Administrator Repola Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Absent: None Mayor Dekker called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Dekker presented a Resolution of Respect (#7-99) in honor of Trustee Bill Marshall to Nikki Marshall and Trustee Marshall's family. The framing for the Resolution and Portrait were donated by Dan Kauffman/The Gallery at the Frame Shop. Ms. Marshall commented that "her father lived exactly as he wanted to live, the Senior Center was his favorite project, and that he should be remembered with a smile because that's the way he lived." Mayor Dekker stated there was a terrible tragedy a week ago today, the Columbine High School Shooting. This tragedy is something no community should go through, and the families have suffered genuine losses. He then requested a few moments of silence to perhaps give thought to the victims and families. The silence was observed. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: None. 1. CONSENTCALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated April 13, 1999. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Works, April 15,1999 - Approval of: 1. Fish Hatchery Roof Replacement, $7,000.00 2. Aerial Mapping Scope of Services, Kucera, $80,400.00 3. Riding Mower, $7,549.08 4. Skid Steer Tractor, $36,269.00 5. Concrete/Asphalt Planer/Grinder, $12,085.00 B. Community Development, April 22, 1999 - Approval of: 1. Community Development a. Floodplain Development - Revise Policy and Procedure Manual 2. Museum a. HVAC System, $25,107.76 . Board of Trustees - April 27,1999 - Page 2 3. Special Events - Parade Permits Lonas Peak Scottish Hiqhlands Festival a. Friday, September 10, 1999, 8:30 p.m. Torch Parade b. Saturday, September 11,1999,10:00 a.m. Festival Parade It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Barker) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Upper Front Range Transportation Plan - Commissioner Disney and Representative Felsburq Holt and Ulleviq. Commissioner Disney introduced Bob Felsburg/Felsburg Holt and Ullevig. Mr. Felsburg updated the Upper Front Range Plan and distributed the preliminary project ranking that will result in the CDOT 2020 Fiscally Constrained Plan. It has been estimated that the Upper Front Range will receive $185 Million of Other Regional Priority Funds for over the next 20 years. Preliminary allocation of these funds are: Highway/$118.92 Million, System Preservation/$61.14 Million, Transportation Support Systems/SO.30 Million, and Rail/$4.90 Million. Mr. Felsburg defined each category described above and reviewed the Estes Park project ranking: #5 - US 36: add two 6' shoulders from Mar'ys Lake Rd. to Crags Dr.; intersection reconfiguration at Crags Dr. and at Marys Lake Rd.; center turn lane between Elm Rd. and Marys Lake Rd. #12 - US 36 (Lake Estes Causeway): minor widening. #16 - US 34: Dry Gulch Rd. to Mall Rd. major widening. #24 - SH 7: Carriage Dr. to Boulder County Line minor widening. #30 - US 36: Estes Park to Boulder County Line major widening/passing lane. Two other projects that ranked 17 and 22 include a major widening/passing lane on US 34 from Loveland to Estes Park, and pullouts for slower moving traffic on US 36 from Estes Park to the Boulder County Line. Various projects were included pursuant to the public meetings, and Mr. Felsburg encouraged everyone to complete a public comment sheet and send it to Felsburg. Mayor Dekker expressed the Board's appreciation for the first- rate presentation. Trustee Baudek questioned if projects on the final list will be constructed in ranking order, and Mr. Felsburg responded that projects may not necessarily be constructed in order. The Transportation Plan is a tool to identify which projects are in the State Plan-when a project is on the Plan, construction occurs when it is timely. Mayor ProTem Doylen stated the Plan is effective, fair, and it addresses safety issues; methodology has been established, and the Plan distributes funding fairly well. Assistant Town Administrator Repola commented that the Upper Front Range were very responsive to complaints received on the lack of pullouts, and the proposed schedule should assist in alleviating and relieve traffic strain. Commissioner Disney added that there is a possibility that if the Estes Valley Feasibility Transportation Study for RMNP is completed, and it verifies that the Western Bypass (project currently ranked 51) is needed to make US 34/36 function better, then this project becomes more regional in nature and it would be easier to argue for dollars. Mayor Dekker confirmed the need for this Bypass. Commissioner Disney stated that one reason Estes Park faired so well in the ranking process is due to Public Works Director Linnane, who prepared the most thorough and best project descriptions. 2. Ordinance #3-99, Booth Resubdivision Vacation of Water Line and Light and Power Easements. Public Works Director Linnane confirmed that the Fl Board of Trustees - April 27,1999 - Page 3 Public Works Committee recommended approval of the vacation easement for Maria H.Y. and Johnson W.K. Linn, and that the property owners have submitted new easements. Existing easements have been relocated, new easements prepared and all is in order. Town Attorney White read the Ordinance, and it was moved and seconded (Baudek/Hix) Ordinance #3-99 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 3. Ordinance #4-99, E. Riverside Dr. Temporary Encroachment Easement. Public Works Director Linnane also confirmed that the Public Works Committee recommended approval of this temporary easement, including the four conditions as specified in the Public Works Committee minutes dated April 15, 1999 and included in the Grant. Town Attorney White clarified that the temporary encroachment easement will be in effect until July 1, 2000, and that the emergency clause has been added pursuant to the imminent sale of the property. Town Attorney White read the Ordinance, and it was moved and seconded (Doylen, encourage fix when change hands/Hix) Ordinance #4-99 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. Resolution #8-99 - Authorizing the Contracts between CDOT and the Town of Estes Park for: (1) the Highway 34/36 Underpass Proiect, CDOT #STE 0361-054, and (2) the Highway 34/36 Bridge and Roadwav Widening Proiect, CDOT #STA 0361-049. Public Works Director Linnane reviewed the Resolution authorizing both projects as identified above. Town Attorney White read the Resolution, and it was moved and seconded (Baudek/Hix) Resolution #8-99 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 3. TOWN ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: None. 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Staff requested authorization to enter Executive Session to discuss Personnel. Trustee Hix noted that the Board does not take action during any Executive Session. Open Session would be reconvened if any action is necessary. It was moved and seconded (HiWJeffrey) the Board enter Executive Session to discuss Personnel, and it passed unanimously. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dekker adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 7:45 p.m. Mayor Dekker reconvened the meeting at 8:38 p.m. Friends of Stanley Hall have discussed a memorial to Bill Marshall, and Mayor Dekker authorized Assistant Town Administrator Repola to discuss options for such a memorial at the upcoming Senior Center Board Meeting. Mayor Dekker adjourned the meeting at 8:38 p.m. Robert L. Dekker, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk BRADFORO PUSLISHING co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee May 6, 1999 Committee: Trustees Baudek and Hix Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Town Administrator Repola, Police Lieutenant van Deutekom, Fire Chief Dorman, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Trustee Hix called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Minolta CS PRO 2080 Copier Purchase. Lt. van Deutekom reported that the current Police Department copier is unreliable due to numerous and lengthy repair periods. The current copier has been out of service at least 12 times during the past year. Based on demonstration machines tested, the most reliable copier was a Minolta CS PRO 2080. The total cost to purchase the Minolta copier is $7,393 and the 1999 Budget includes $7,000 for this equipment. The present copier can be sold outright for $750, which would cover the deficiency. The Committee recommends approval of the purchase of the Minolta CS PRO 2080 copier at a cost of $7,393. Customer Surveys. Lt. van Deutekom presented the Customer Service Survey Report for the first quarter of 1999. A total of 104 surveys were tallied for Patrol and 24 for Communications utilizing a rating scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1-unsatisfactory to 5- outstanding). Survey averages from the report ranged from 4.51 to 4.92. Lt. van Deutekom noted that Patrol currently contacts citizens by phone and Communications uses prepaid postage cards. Personnel Update and Introduction. Lt. van Deutekom reported the hiring of two Police Officers, Sheila Baker and Kent Brandsted. Also, Mark Swallow has been rehired and is currently covering shifts. Trustee Hix requested that the Officers be introduced at the May 11 th Town Board meeting. FIRE DEPARTMENT Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Platte River Power Authority (PRPA): Fire Chief Dorman presented a Memorandum of Understanding with PRPA outlining assistance guidelines between the Town and PRPA and noted that Town Attorney White is currently reviewing the document. Fire Chief Dorman reported that the Fire Department unanimously supports the MOU. The Cominittee recommends approval of the Memorandum of Understanding with PRPA contingent upon Town Attorney White's approval. REPORTS Year End NIBRS Reports for 1996, 1997, 1998: Lt. van Deutekom presented the year end NIBRS Crime Summary Reports including statistics from 1996, 1997, and 1998. Lt. van Deutekom reported that drug offenses are on the rise and noted that there were 14 cases reported in 1996, 25 in 1997 and 49 in 1998. Assistant Town Administrator Repola noted that a Special Enforcement Unit has been formed to investigate drug offenses in a more assertive manner. Further discussion included auto thefts, burglaries, and the Group B offenses. BRADFORD PUSLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - May 6, 1999 - Page 2 Communications - Quarterly Compliance Report: Lt. van Deutekom presented the first quarter Quality Assurance Compliance for Emergency Medical Dispatch report. A quality assurance team consisting of dispatchers and EMT personnel review 911 tapes and score the compliance of individual calls. A total of 79 calls were reviewed with an average score of 99.08% compliance. Personnel: Lt. van Deutekom reported that a Letter of Commendation was issued to Officer Jim Kenney and Letters of Recognition were issued to Officer Scott Roth and Officer Ryan Alberts. There being no further business, Trustee Hix adjourned the meeting at 8:29 a.m. 127., Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk eRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission April 20, 1999 Commission: Chair Al Sager, Commissioners Harriet Burgess, Stephen Gillette, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chair Sager, Commissioners Burgess, Gillette, Pohl and Thomas Absent: Commissioner Hix Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Stamey, Senior Planner Joseph, and Recording Secretary Wheatley Absent None Chair Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. MINUTES of the March 16,1999 were approved as presented. Chair Sager welcomed the public and reviewed the rules of conduct for a public hearing. 2. SUBDIVISIONS a. Amended Plat and Rezoning of Tract 69, Fall River Addition, North of Highway 34, West of Nicky's Restaurant, Rocky Mountain National Park Associates (Curt Buchholtz)/Applicant. This is a 35-acre tract of land now zoned E-Estate. The proposal is to create a new 28.33 acre tract (Lot 69A) to be given to Rocky Mountain National Park as permanent open space. Tract 698 would be limited by this plat to a maximum of 10 dwelling units. This lot is also proposed to be rezoned to R-M, Multi-Family. This zone now allows either single family subdivision, multi-family development, or commercial accommodations since it is located on an arterial street. It is expected that 698 will be re-sold to a developer. No specific development proposal for 698 is being made at this time. Bill Van Horn was present representing the applicant. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report and recommendations. Mr. Van Horn noted that the comments made by the Public Works Director will be addressed in the development plan. It was also noted that this tract is a significant sheep habitat and that this was a public/private attempt to permanently set aside a large portion of this area. The National Park prefers not to have park property right along the highway. The legally required private access and utility easement to Lot 69A will be in the hands of the National Park and will in all likelihood be limited to pedestrian access. Mr. Van Horn advised that there were no problems in meeting all of the staff recommendations and that there will be documentation of the transfer to the Park. All of the land is currently under contract to be sold to Rocky Mountain National Park Associates. The commission inquired if Lot 69A could be designated as a non-build lot. Mr. Van Horn agreed that it would be. Town Attorney White asked for confirmation that this would not create problems with tax ramifications. Mr. Van Horn confirmed that it would not. eMAOFORO PUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 2 Audience Comments: Pieter Hondius, 1996 Uplands Circle, owns properly east of this property. He feels this is an intelligent land use giving the sheep habitat a buffer from the road, while at the same time allowing the owners to receive some benefit from the property. It was moved and seconded (Burgess/Gillette) that the Amended Plat and Rezoning of Tract 69, Fal! River Addition, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees subject to the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with one absent. 1. A private access/utility easement must be provided from Highway 34 to Lot 69A with this plat, and the dedication statement revised accordingly. 2. The existing power line easement should be labeled as such. 3. The proposed restriction on future development shall be clarified, and construction of single detached units, or duplex units shall be further restricted or prohibited. 4. Adequate assurance of the transfer of ownership to the National Park of Lot 69A should be provided prior to Town Board approval. 5. A note shall be added to the plat indicating that Lot 69A is non-build. 6. Rezoning of Lot 69B to RM - Multi Family, be concurrent with the transfer of ownership of 69A to the National Park. b. Final Plat, Dill Subdivision, a portion of Lot 5, Section 1, Arapaho Meadows Addition, located at 2381 South St. Vrain Avenue, Rick & Cathy Dill/Applicants. Paul Kochevar representing the applicants reviewed the proposal. The existing lot would be divided into 3 lots with access for Lots 1 and 2 being from Arapaho Road, and Lot 3 from Highway 7. CDOT prefers a shared access with the lot adjacent to Lot 3 and negotiations are being held with the neighbor. Should negotiations for the shared access fail, CDOT has agreed to allow a direct access to Lot 3. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the recommended conditions with the change that Item 5 include the entirety of the access be vacated. Mr. Kochevar advised that the westerly line of the access easement belongs to a neighboring property and can't be vacated. The northwesterly line is only proposed and can be eliminated. There was no public comment. It was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) the Final Plat of Dill Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees subject to the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with one absent. 1. A construction plan for the shared driveways to Lots 1 and 2 shall be provided prior to town Board. A driveway apron maintenance agreement shall also be provided, and it shall be the developer's responsibility to construct the shared portion of the driveways as per the approved construction plan. 2. A CDOT access permit is needed for Lot 3. This access permit shall be obtained prior to Town Board approval of this final Plat. In the event this access point is shared with the property adjacent to the east, a shared access easement shall I.A.FOROP.0..HING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20,1999 Page 3 be added to the Final Plat as required, and a draft of a shared access maintenance agreement shall also be provided prior to Town Board. 3. A temporary access easement shall be prepared and recorded that provides for the temporary access of Lot 2 across Lot 3 to Highway 7. Provisions for the expiration of that access easement and the removal and revegetation of the existing road should be included. This document should be reviewed and approved by the Town Attorney prior to Town Board approval of the Final Plat. 4. The proposed access easement on the northwest property line shall be removed from this plat. 5. The dedication statement shall be revised as per Greg White's memo, and shall be reviewed by Mr. White prior to Town Board. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS a. Amended Development Plan 97-16, Lot 2, Block 4, Fall River Estates, Fall River Road and Fish Hatchery Road, Craig & Keeley Hansen and Marjorie Oliver/Applicants. Paul Kochevar representing the applicants reviewed the amended development plan. The two duplex units on the south side of Fall River have been combined to create a fourplex. On the north side of Fall River a duplex unit has been placed to minimize the loss of trees. The swimming pool has also been removed. The applicants have no problem with staff recommendation. The Army Corps of Engineers has granted a permit to construct an electric conduit and sewer line to cross beneath the Fall River. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed staff recommendations and added two additional conditions: (1) Based on DOW's comment that this area is frequented by bears, the trash enclosure or dumpster should be secured against bears; and (2) Approval of this amendment does not extend the expiration date of the original plan completion date. He also reviewed a letter from Keith Keenan of Alpine Anglers/Trout Unlimited and noted that the first two staff recommendations are aimed at his first two comments. The Town Engineer's comments are included in the staff recommendation by reference. It was clarified that any activity below the high water line of the river requires an approval and is regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers. A bridge that is above the high water line does not require a permit from the Corps. Audience comments: Patrick Cipolla (632 Aspen Avenue) requested clarification of who was Town Engineer and what permits are used by the Town to provide quality control over developments. Director Stamey identified Mr. Bill Linnane as Town Engineer and reviewed floodplain permits. Keith Keenan (2501 Big Thompson Canyon) approved the river crossing recommendation and requested that similar requirements be implemented for all river crossings on both the Big Thompson and Fall River. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Pohl) the Amended Development Plan 97-16, Lot 2, Block 4, Fall River Estates, be BRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 4 approved with the following conditions, and it passed unanimously with one absent. 1. The following note shall be added to the approved plan: "Approval of this plan and subsequent issuance of a building permit does not authorize any construction activities within the river channel. Construction activities in the river channel are regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers and all such activities require a Town flood plain construction permit and a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers and must conform to the conditions of the permit." 2. The construction detail submitted by the applicant's engineer (dated April 13, 1999 Job#3016) showing the utility river crossing method, (or an equal alternative prepared by a qualified professional engineer) shall be submitted with the application for a floodplain construction permit, and shall be adhered to by the developer and his contractors and sub- contractors. A copy of this detail along with a copy of the flood plain construction permit, and all other required permits shall be on site in the possession of the contractor responsible for performing the work in the river channel at all times. The Town shall be given two working days notice prior to actual commencement of work in the river channel, and the developer shall be responsible to retain a qualified professional engineer to perform on-site inspection of both the work in progress, and the completed construction. This engineer shall then provide written verification of compliance with all required permits relating to work in the river channel prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 3. All requirements outlined in Bill Unnane's memo dated April 12, 1999, shall be complied with, and no structure shall be allowed to encroach into the sanitary sewer easement. 4. All trash enclosures and dumpsters shall be bear resistant. 5. Approval of this amended development plan does not extend the expiration date of the original plan completion date. b. Development Plans 99-04 and 99-05, Lot 3 and Lot 4, Block 4, Fall River Estates, Fish Hatchery and David Drive, Randy Collins/Applicant. This is a proposal to build 16 multi-family attached dwelling units in four buildings on Lot 3 and 22 multi-family attached dwelling units in four buildings on Lot 4. There would also be a separate office/laundry building and a separate 1280 s.f. recreation/meeting building with associated parking on Lot 4. The units may be managed for overnight accommodations when not occupied by the owners. Since Lot 3 is adjacent to Lot 4 which is also under consideration for the same intended use with the same owner and applicant, it was decided to review both Lots 3 and 4 at the same time. There is no river crossing involved in this property and no encroachment into wetlands. Fire protection brought into the vicinity is adequate for both properties. Applicant is in agreement with staff recommendations. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report. The density calculation gives full credit to the church parking lot which is leased to the Methodist Church. Due to this, Staff recommends that a note be placed on the plat that no future non-conforming lot splits be permitted. Staff recommendation No. 4 regarding any activity in the river channel will be a general note on BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 5 any development plan that has river frontage. Staff also recommends the additional condition regarding bear resistant dumpsters. It was noted that the Town has no obligation to fulfill the proposal noted in Mr. Kochevar's letter dated January 26, 1999, to create a public trail and pocket park in exchange for an increase in density. Commissioner Thomas commended the staff for the inclusion of Recommendation #4 and requested similar regulation regarding run- off into the river. Staff advised that this would be addressed in a pre- construction meeting as an administrative policy. Audience Comments: Jeanette Villers (1720 Avalon Drive) expressed concern that the new accommodations would also use the church parking lot on weekends when it is already crowded. Mr. Kochevar advised there was no connection between the church parking lot and the development. The applicant's intention is not to use the church parking lot and sufficient parking is provided in the development. Cindy Younglund Lydell: asked for clarification regarding the use of the church parking lot in the density calculation. Keith Keenan (2501 Big Thompson Ave.): Expressed concern about development impacts on water quality and wildlife habitat. He also noted that Randy Collins (applicant) is under litigation for his involvement in the fish kill on his other development downstream. Town Attorney Greg White advised that the Town has taken all the possible legal steps to address these concerns. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Gillette) that Development Plan 99-04, Lot 3, Block 4, Fall River Estates, be approved with the following conditions, and it passed with the following votes. Those voting "Yes" - Commissioners Burgess, Gillette, Pohl and Chair Sager; those voting "No" - Commissioner Thomas. 1. A planting schedule providing required plantings and showing species, size, and quantities be provided. 2. Bear resistant dumpsters be provided for the project. 3. Plat be noted that no future non-conforming lot splits will be permitted. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Burgess) that Development Plan 99-05, Lot 4, Block 4, Fall River Estates, be approved with the following conditions, and it passed with the following votes. Those voting "Yes" - Commissioners Burgess, Gillette, Pohl and Chair Sager; those voting "No" - Commissioner Thomas. 1. A planting schedule providing required plantings and showing species, size, and quantities be provided. 2. Bear resistant dumpsters be provided for the project. 3. Plat be noted that no future non-conforming lot splits will be permitted. BRADFORO PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 6 Chair Sager called a 5-minute recess to allow the next applicant to set up. 4. SPECIAL REVIEW a. Concept Plan, Special Review 99-01, Wildlife Center, Tract 5, Beaver Point First Addition, south side of Highway 36, west of RiverRock Townhomes, International Concept Management/ Applicant. Paul Kochevar began the presentation by introducing the International Concept Management team from Grand Junction: Roger Reynolds, CEO; Scott Sullivan, CFO; Bill Watts, architect, Bill Zigler, animal consultant and John Palmquist, attorney. Mr. Reynolds reviewed their concept for the Rocky Mountain Interpretative Wildlife Center. There would be educational displays as well as living exhibits. Their intent in design and concept is for unparalleled educational opportunity with classroom children as well as the general public. Mr. Reynolds acknowledged that dealing with animals in captivity is an emotional issue, but their hope is to see our native wildlife survive and flourish. Education about wildlife and their habitat is an important part of becoming good stewards of our world. Their building is designed to look and feel like a mountain lodge with minimal impact to the property which is zoned commercial. They are not removing any of the existing trees and the building is 140 feet from the river's edge. Less than half of the exhibits are living exhibits. The remainder includes a classroom setting, changing exhibits, guest lectures and demonstrations, an art gallery, sculpture garden, gift shop and small caM. Their end result will be a better understanding of all living things and their environment. There would be a total of 47 species including reptiles and amphibians. All animals are captive bred. Birds of prey will be on exhibit from a Denver non-profit organization and these birds cannot be released into the wild for various reasons. The air quality was mentioned as a concern. The exhaust system will be similar to the Mills Mall in Ontario, California, which greatly diffuses any odor. There will be ozonators that neutralize nitrates and nitrogen, which is the main cause of odor. Feces disposal would be taken to a local landfill weekly or bi-weekly in quantities that will not require outside storage. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the staff report and advised that this is only a concept plan. A more detailed development plan will come back to the Planning Commission for review. Correspondence received: The National Park Service was concerned with the message of approaching wildlife. DOW commented on wildlife habitat disturbed asking that some consideration be given to restricting any use of fencing that would restrict movement of deer and elk to the river corridor. Letters from residents generally expressing objections and oppositions: Kathryn Reed (Goodlettsville, TN); Dr. Celeste Lasky (2441 Long View Drive); Anne Buttner (1520 Upper Broadview); Joanne Wein (695A Homestead Lane); and EVIA. John Henry (401 Riverside Drive) expressed concern about removing vegetation along the river. Mr. BRAOFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20,1999 Page 7 Joseph reviewed Mr. Kochevar's letter of April 17, 1999, which summarized traffic projections. A full traffic study is pending. Audience comments: Gaylord Villers (1720 Avalon) - there is enough wildlife in the area without bringing in caged ones. Traffic congestion would also increase. Patrick Cipolla (632 Aspen Avenue): Where will the water be diverted? Current proposal does not include that feature. Commended the applicant on the design, but opposed traffic congestion and caged animals. Education is already being provided by the Park. Jim Martel (RiverRock Condominium Association): Concerned that this proposal is of sufficient intensity of impact to require more details at this stage. RiverRock is zoned commercial but is residential, and that is what should be compared. Traffic will impact adjacent property with long waits to get into RiverRock. Need to review social and community needs as well as economic needs. Noting there may be minimal benefits economically to Town. Accommodation use is called for in the Comprehensive Plan, not greater development. He suggested the Planning Commission defer decision until the traffic study is complete. Paula Conn (514 Grand Estates Drive): This is a beautiful center. We need business in winter; too bad they're planning to close then. What are the fee charges which might affect the success of this project? Mary Jo Morra: Her concern is for the animals since she has worked at zoos and seen what captivity does to animals with people coming in, the noise from people to animals causes suffering, they pace and become traumatized by too many people. Where will the animals go at night? A major wildlife area is being removed by allowing this development. Don Burback, Telemark: There had been a proposed RV park in this location which was declined due to traffic concerns. Burrowing animals will find their way out to neighboring areas. Sonja McTeague, Glen Haven: Where and when did we change the meaning of nature and natural. Zoos in any form belong in cities. Nature and commercial are oxymorons. Any development is permanently destroying nature. Steve Todd (2715 Lory Lane): Commends their beautiful building and their intention of appreciation of the natural world and emphasis on education; however, this is a paid tourist attraction. We need to look carefully at whether it is education or commerce. If we collectively decide to be against it, what might be a replacement? Light pollution, traffic, and potential for runoff from parking lot into the river all need to be addressed. Pauline Bustamanti (2599 Big Thompson Canyon Road): Educator for over 25 years who came for the natural wildlife. Our greatest OF?ADFOROPUBLISHING co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 8 resource is our closeness to Rocky Mountain National Park. As an educator she would prefer to go out into the real nature. Animals in a cage give a wrong impression on how we view wildlife. Will the traffic study be in the height of tourist season? As stewards, we need to go slow to make good decisions. We cannot put back open fields (once they are developed). Pieter Hondius (1996 Uplands Circle): Property rights need to be defined. There is a right to request consideration of a special review use, but this does not guarantee the use. The Honda School (Eagle Rock) was similar, but they allowed a large conservation easement. If this fails, what is it going to be? What's left for the community? Jane Dable, Greenwood animal Sanctuary in Lyons: This proposal is not educational. Wild animals do not have interaction with humans. These animals will be depressed, lethargic. These animals are born and bred to be in captivity. It is not natural. Susan Wolf (425 Ski Road, Allenspark) ecologist who has worked with animal rescue groups for 20 years: Animals cannot interact indoors without sunshine and fresh air. Feces volume removal is greatly underestimated. Alan Oliver: Those opposed should remain to become more organized. David Habecker (221 Big Horn Drive): We do need to mitigate problems but this is a quality development. The Town needs this project. Maybe quality developers will reject Estes Park. What else will there be instead-RiverRock 11? Chris Hazelton: Personally supports the development. No better education resource to benefit residents and tourists. Has rehabilitated wildlife and has seen how having a child look into the eyes of a real animal creates appreciation. Would be a welcome addition to our town. Cherie Pettyjohn (513 Grand Estates Drive): Sales tax is needed to avoid high property taxes. Those going to MacGregor Ranch have had a good experience. This proposal would be preferable to condos. Open space is great but there is tax expense. People could buy the property and leave it as private open space. Beverly Briggs (1 840 North Ridge Lane): Excited about this development. It's a terrific educational opportunity. Something will be built there sooner or later. This is aesthetically pleasing and a place for animals that cannot make it in the wild. Better than Estes Park becoming known as a condo city. Meredith Sloan, 4th generation resident and adjacent property owner: As far as choices, this is a great project. Children do learn from going to zoos. Response from Roger Reynolds: The animal component creates an emotional issue. The initial feasibility study looked at traffic; BRADFORDPUSLISHING Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20,1999 Page 9 Highway 36 is a main artery with a tremendous of use during summer months. They would not be adding to the traffic count. They have visited other living museums which has helped on how to consider the problems of smell and other concerns. They have not yet determined to close in winter. The center will be open through the winter the first year. Open until Christmas is guaranteed. January through March is questionable for future years. Paul Kochevar updated tra#ic projections. In discussions with CDOT, drainage was not a problem since it all drains away from the road. In the traffic study they estimated 200 cars turning left per hour, which is an over projection. They will have the full transportation study before going to Town Board. Julia Lamy (Rock Ridge Road): Requested clarification on a boundary issue. Ricki Ingersoll (RiverRock): This will never be a RiverRock West because it is too expensive for condos. National Park Village North is also going to be a wildlife education center. During the summer, there is bumper to bumper traffic. There is no sales tax from admission. Accommodations would bring in four times the revenue to the Town than the snack and gift shops. Director Stamey noted the procedure is that this concept review by Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the Town Board, then a development plan would be presented to Planning Commission after Town Board approval. However, the use itself cannot be reviewed again. Commissioners Pohl and Thomas felt there was insufficient information to make a decision at this time. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Thomas) that the Concept Plan, Special Review 99-01, Wildlife Center, Tract 5, Beaver Point First addition be continued to the May Planning Commission meeting, and it passed unanimously with one absent. Chair Sager called for a 15-minute break. 5. WILDFIRE RIDGE PRESENTATION Town Attorney Greg White noted that Wildfire Ridge was annexed pursuant to an annexation agreement, site specific development. Any amendment to that annexation agreement must have approval from the owner and the Town Board. Peter and Ricki Ingersoll of Pinnacle Homes & Design and Rusty Collins of Neighbor to Neighbor (a non-profit organization organized in 1970 in Larimer County) presented an informal review regarding affordable housing. As a citizen and developer, they wanted dialogue with the Town regarding the possibilities for affordable housing. They reviewed the definitions for various levels of low income based on the area median income. Low income is considered by the government as below 80% of AMI. Less than 60% AMI, there is no possibility for home ownership. Their focus was in the 60-80% bracket. Tools for affordable home DRADFORDPUOLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 10 ownership: tax exempt mortgages, down payment assistance, grants, donation of materials, density. Density supports affordability. Any policy meant to support affordable housing must address both rental and home ownership. Rental Housing target - 40 to 60% AMI; Home Ownership target - 60 to 80% AMI. Chair Sager expressed his appreciation for the presentation. Audience comments: Ralph Nicholas (1660 North Ridge Lane): The average selling price may be in the $220,000 range, but the median price was around $180,000. He commends the Planning Commission on their approach to provide affordable housing. Asking to deviate from the original development plan is asking a lot. John Zollman (1741 North Ridge Lane): Question - where are the price subsidies and tax exempt mortgage rates they mentioned? Peter Ingersoll - The price subsidies do not exist-meant to include any other source, but there are none. There are assistance programs that do provide lower mortgage rates. This illustrates the price gap between what a working family can afford and what real estate costs. There were no comments from the Commissioners. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m. hY\ul 1 M t£) 414 0 2.tu~_- Meribeth Wheatley, Recording€ecretary MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey, AICP Community Development Director SUBJECT: Final Plat, Dill Subdivision (Dill) DATE: May 6, 1999 Background This site is located at 2381 So. St. Vrain. The site is 10.41 acres, and is zoned E-Estate. There is an existing single family residence on the property. This subdivision proposes to divide the site into 3 lots of 5.1, 2.2 (existing house) , and 2.8 acres. The proposed subdivision complies with the minimum lot area requirements and provisions of the Municipal Code. The plat has incorporated recommendations of the Planning Commission. 8 E~~~--r-·21 22 ~:~ 3 TRACT 7 4 6 ARAPAIHO i n 12 13 1 2 3 ESTAT S OUTLCT 9 8 < 7 j s SITE r 5 4 3 TRACT - 1 Colo. ARAPAHO *e ' ~r---».1 MEADOWS $ -. ~:23-1 ~RgY FO)f ;-C~RRIAGE - Recommendation Approval of the Final Plat, Dill Subdivision. MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey, AICP Community Development Director SUBJECT: Amended Plat, Lot 1, Prosser Subdivision (Paglia) DATE: May 6, 1999 Background This site is located at 1421 So. St. Vrain. This is a proposal to divide an existing lot into two lots of 28,435 (1B) and 44,182 (lA) sq. ft. The site is zoned RM-Multi-family. The proposed subdivision conforms to the minimum lot area requirements and applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. Both lots will share the existing access to Hwy 7. The plat also meets the recommended conditions of the Planning Commission. CLLE_l //ll// iLL_»1 - r-~-~·-- px '°€11. ti I r-1 d A Li .1,~ P I SITE -11-1 1 1 MODDEAND 1 1151&171 . 1 2 1 2644234*EAOISION - rf-~~312«L:fill-*- l , 10 It i li ' i\• 1++ 4.61·8 ~LLS » 7 JJ- kE/,1 K A-' --1%65£41 R/1 ICLUT- I / 1 C U <'.1 / -rn ,/el j \0/4\ 1 1 / /4 / 5 11 1 L."ar~467-L \E--32\ * v .4 i ES~TATES 9 1 ~29 ~ a KM VIEV ;*IVE lili Recommendation Approval of the Amended Plat of Lot 1, Prosser Subdivision. May. 6.1999 8:53AM SECURITY ESTES PARK bo. 12 7 b i', 1 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FROM: ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC. Post Office Box 3047 retaphon. 970*65175 Esteo Pcl<, CO 805 17 FAX received 01 970·686-6331 May 6,1999 FAX NO. 970-586-0249 TO: BOB AT TOWN OF ESTES PARK No. of sheets including cover sheet -1 Re: Amended Plat of Prosser Subdivision Dill Subdivision John Phipps will present a letter to you verifying signatures on the Dill Subdivision plat on the 1101 of May forthe Town Board meeting. John Phipps Is also the attorney for Tony Paglia. He is out of town (England) until May 17th. Tony did not contact him before he left town to ask for a certification letter. Can we give you an O&E indicating the appropriate signatures, have the Town Board act on the 11th, and then get John to provide the letter on the 17th when he returns. In the intervening week the plat would be held by the planning office awaiting the certification letter, If this is not an appropriate method, we will ask Tony to arrange for another attorney to provide the letter on the 11th. Paul Kochevar cc: Tony Paglia Town Clerk's Office Memo To: Honorable Mayor Dekker Board of Trustees Town Administrator Widmer Assistant Town Administrator Repola From: Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Date: May 5, 1999 Subject: Trustee Vacancy Mayor Dekker has contacted Stephen Gillette, and he is willing to serve as Trustee. The following Committee assignments are being submitted: Trustee Hix - Chairman, Public Safety Mayor ProTem Doylen - Museum Liaison Trustee Barker - Rooftop Rodeo Committee Liaison Trustee Gillette - Member of the Public Safety Committee and " Community Development Committee Recommendation: Motion to: (1) Appoint Stephen W. Gillette, Trustee, with a term expiring April, 2000 (2) Endorse the Committee assignments listed above. ESTES VALLEY INTER-AGENCY . COUNCIL //€a---- 3 May 11, 1999. Mayor Bob Dekker and Members of the Estes ParM\>tqa-of Trupe€es P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 U- Ladies and Gentlemen, We, of theEstes Valley Inter-Agency Council wish to express our strong support for the "Wildfire Ridge" proposal being advanced by Pinnacle Houses and Designs. Our community is badly in need of additional housing, particularly for low-income families and for families earning between $40,000 and $50,000. "Wildfire Ridge" would accomodate those in the latter group, possibly freeing up some dwellings for the group mentioned first. We look forward to the day when all our community employees, whether they be teachers, nurses, clerks, or waitresses, will find adequate housing in the Estes Valley where they can live and participate fully in our community. Sincerely, 01<67,0 G€-4-' ~_-.000 Louise Olson, Chairperson Estes Valley Inter-Agency Council Encl r .' 2/25/99 ESTES VALLEY INTER-AGENCY COUNCIL 2/25/99 Lee Kundtz Habitat for Humanity Board of Directors 343 Ute Lane Estes Park, CO 80517 586-1779 Tobi Hale 1352 Mary's Lake Road Estes Park, CO 80517 586-4850 Helen Platt - Vice President League of Women Voters 201 Fall River Lane Estes Park, CO 80517 586-6753 Eileen Flaherty, FNP Salud Family Health Center PO Box 2805 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-9230 Ann Widmer Salud Family Health Center 541 Big Thompson PO Box 2805 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-9230 Gene Mitchell 586-2581 801 E. Lane Estes Park, CO 80517 Richard Widmer - Town Administrator PO Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-5331 586-6518 Mary Lou Fialla, President Board of Directors Estes Park Senior Center PO Box 3842 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-6347 Shannon Freed Neighbor to Neighbor 424 Pine St. Fort Collins, CO 80524 407-7052 Dave Thomas Executive Director Estes Park Chamber Resort Association 500 Big Thompson Avenue Estes Park, CO 80517 586-4431 or voice mail 586-0144 Janice Newman PO Box 4436 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-2825 Margie Greenlee PO Box 1522 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-8103 Shannon Graham, Director Partners of Estes Park PO Box 484 Estes Park, CO 80517 Chuck Carspecken Caring Pregnancy Center PO Box 1503 Estes Park, CO 80517 586-2422 Wes Pixler, Chairperson '06/10/2020 08:11 9705863511 FROM PROSPECT REALTY PAGE 02 Eric W. Blackhurst U AN 1 0 1999 ~~i P.O. Box 334 Estes Park, CO 80817 May 10, 1999 Mayor and Town Trustees P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 To the Mayor and Town Trustees I will be unable to attend the Town Board Meeting on May 11, 1999. However, I want to express my strongest support for the Wildfire Ridge project propoged by Pinnacle Homes and Designs. The need to tbis type of housing in our community increases daily. If you will recall the 1990 housing study conducted by The Forward Estes Park Foundation, the need was significant at thai time and has only accelerated since then. Anything that the town can do to support projects of this nature will only enhance the community. Sincerely, Oe Utty- Eric W. Blackhurst, Ed I). BAADFOROPUOUIHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - April 20, 1999 Page 9 .. Highway 36 is a main artery with a tremendous of use during~ . - summer months. They would not be adding to the traffic count. 4 f They have visited other living museums which has helped on how to j consider the problems of smell and other concerns. They have not~ '~ yet determined to close in winter. The center will be open through the winter the first year. Open until Christmas is guaranteed. January through March is questionable for future years. Paul Kochevar updated traffic projections. In discussions with CDOT, drainage was not a problem since it all drains away from the road. In the traffic study they estimated 200 cars turning left per hour, which is an over projection. They will have the full transportation study before going to Town Board. Julia Lamy (Rock Ridge Road): Requested clarification on a boundary issue. Ricki Ingersoll (RiverRock): This will never be a RiverRock West because it is too expensive for condos. National Park Village North is also going to be a wildlife education center. During the summer, there is bumper to bumper traffic. There is no sales tax from admission. Accommodations would bring in four times the revenue to the Town than the snack and gift shops. Director Stamey noted the procedure is that this concept review by Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the Town Board, then a development plan would be presented to Planning Commission after Town Board approval. However, the use itself cannot be reviewed again. Commissioners Pohl and Thomas felt there was insufficient information to make a decision at this time. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Thomas) that the Concept Plan, Special Review 99-01, Wildlife Center, Tract 5, Beaver Point First addition be continued to the May Planning Commission meeting, and it passed unanimously with one absent. Chair Sager called for a 1 5-minute break. 4 5. WILDFIRE RIDGE PRESENTATION Town Attorney Greg White noted that Wildfire Ridge was annexed pursuant to an annexation agreement, site specific development. Any amendment to that annexation agreement must have approval from the owner and the Town Board. Peter and Ricki Ingersoll of Pinnacle Homes & Design and Rusty Collins of Neighbor to Neighbor (a non-profit organization organized in 1970 in Larimer County) presented an informal review regarding affordable housing. As a citizen and developer, they wanted dialogue with the Town regarding the possibilities for atfordable housing. They reviewed the definitions for various levels of low income based on the area median income. Low income is considered by the government as below 80% of AMI. Less than 60% AMI, there is no possibility for home ownership. ' Their focus was in the 60-80% bracket. Tools for affordable home ....FOROPUILIS'INGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission -April 20, 1999 Page 10 fl ownership: tax exempt mortgages, down payment assistance, grants, donation of materials, density. Density supports affordability. Any policy meant to support affordable housing must address both rental and home ownership. Rental Housing target - 40 to 60% AMI; Home Ownership target - 60 to 80% AMI. I Chair Sager expressed his appreciation for the presentation. Audience comments: Ralph Nicholas (1660 North Ridge Lane): The average selling price may be in the $220,000 range, but the median price was around $180,000. He commends the Planning Commission on their approach to provide affordable housing. Asking to deviate from the original development plan is asking a lot. John Zollman (1741 North Ridge Lane): Question - where are the price subsidies and tax exempt mortgage rates they mentioned? Peter Ingersoll - The price subsidies do not exist-meant to include any other source, but there are none. There are assistance programs that do provide lower mortgage rates. This illustrates the price gap between what a working family can afford and what real estate costs. There were no comments from the Commissioners. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m. 47\0.Ai lat-L) 0.7( 0014- Meribeth Wheatley, Recording€ecretary 4 ORDINANCE NO. 5-99 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, 1999 EDITION WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to adopt the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 14.20 of the Municipal Code is hereby adopted as follows: 14.20.010 National Electric Code, 1999, Adopted. The National Electric Code, 1999 Edition, issued by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc., Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269, is enacted and adopted by reference as a primary code and incorporated in this chapter. 14.20.015 National Electric Code, 1999-Violation. A. It is unlawful for any person to violate any of the provisions stated or adopted in the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition. B. Every person convicted of a violation of any provision stated or adopted in the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition, shall be punished as set forth in Section 1.20.020 of the Municipal Code. 14.20.017 Damages. Neither the Town's Building Inspector, Town Engineer, Light and Power Director, nor any other employee or agent of the Town of Estes Park, nor any volunteer acting on behalf of the Town, shall be liable for any damages for any act and/or omission by such person, pursuant to the duties and enforcement of the provisions of the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition. 14.20.020 License-Required. It is unlawful for any person to engage in the business of installation, alteMng or repairing electrical wiring in the Town without first having procured a license therefore from the State. The requirement for a license shall not apply to the owner of any property doing work in or about his own residence, provided that he first obtains the necessary permit therefor. The requirement for a license shall not apply to a joumeyman electrician or helper who is working under the control and supervision of an electrician licensed by the State. 14.20.040 Permit-Application-Issuance. Application for permit shall be made to the Colorado State Electrical Board. Such permit shall be posted on the site of the work, and kept there until the work is completed. 14.20.060 Certificate of approval required. It is unlawful for any person to make any electrical connection to any building until the State Electrical Inspector has issued a certificate approving the electrical wiring. 14.20.070 Permit-Temporary. Where, from good and sufficient cause, it is necessary to have electricity on any installation before the final certificate can be issued, the State Electrical Inspector may issue a temporary permit; provided, that all parts to which current is applied are in a safe and satisfactory condition. 14.20.080 Electrical construction requirements. All new structures and existing structures that are altered, added to or repaired in excess of fifty percent (50%), and which contain, in whole or in part, commercial uses, shall be entirely wired in rigid or steel tube conduits or approved metal raceways. Unless it is otherwise required by applicable provisions of the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition, the requirements of this section do not apply to a freestanding commercial structure served by one electric meter located in the Town's commercial outlying (CO) zone. Section 2. The adoption of this Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF ,1999. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1999, and published in a newspaper of general publication in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, on the day of , 1999. Town Clerk 1 2 ACM) n /nm -** Apr-30-99 08:33A P.01 -3 E (0 7 f[E J Petition ] 11 ,/4 2 U le Ju TO: Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees -7 Estes Valley Planning Commission Larimer County Board of County Commissioners other interested agencies RE: Land Development Code of tho Estes Valley, including the Town of Estes Park alida Estes Valley Development Code Wes the undenagned property owners and citlzens of the Estes Valley respectfully request that aU publio hearings and any·action on the proposed Estes Valley Development Code be postponed until after October 25,1999. We flutherask that such postponement be by formal Resolution of your various Boards. The busy tourist season Is upon our community and none of us has, during the summer and early Fail tourist season, the time to devote to thls process which good planning and due process necessitate. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted In 1996. Almost three years later wenow have a draft of the code. To give landowners, most of whom are those directly and adversely affected by code, only a few weeks to study and evaluate the code and then hold public hearings and take action on code during the summertime when these sarne landowners must devot, their time and energies to their seasonal businesses is unreasonable. Constituent groups havi taken the recently released (and much delayed) draft of the code and mel to review IL We have found that Individual land owners must have tho time and opportunity to meet w,10, Town staff und other professionals in order to determine the impact on specific pieces of propefty. There is -te,confusion as 10 meaning In certain sections ollhe bode and the draft is incomplets. Printed Name of Signature Propety addresi Date Landowner/citizen Return signed petition by Frlday May 7,1999, to either of the three businesses listed below or mall to Warren Clinton, 1850 Falt R}ver Road 05, Estes Park, CO 80517 Sunnyside Knoll 1675 Fall River Road Nicky's 1350 Fall River Road Castle Mountain Lodge 1520 Fall River Road. gcgfie 9 if< N 7.4 Ri /3 94 2 9 93 4 4-1 .04 5 0,333 0 Ch >h 23 \O O- %EEE 01 64 2/1 rper m. 0 4-1 0 2 = r . - T.-( e %2 . C %= 0%22§26 k. ,« %.f) CO 1* 022 - /6 ( percent of the area median income o 116 loans) tueivoid d!.Islaumo JUIOH I.U[!Iel luajied 09 MOIag I luaoiad 66-09 0 luared 69-09 O 070-79 percent waijad 08 1 litv Area i Income %ZE U 4 %-ZI I % €f El 4 / o C 0. 1 Wht :-m 1 /4",1196 ./.-¢~I t 1 7 ft € 4. 6 44, 1 - 43 Affordable Home Ownership in Estes Park 077 'uS!60(I OF SOUIOH DIouuu!d :Xq poluosold Mission Statement • Wildfire Ridge supports the following creed: • A diversified economic community maintains the strength & pride on which our country was founded. pue 0Iquls B Woddns 01 1UOUI@1!nbal Irluoiuepurg B s! 8u!snoH • '4!unUIUIOO OA!soqoo puu poMoolloAO oq lou }SnUI >Iled solsE[ JO 60!1!UIEJ SupILIOM 041 • .I"01% tolluoo 01 Ieozino u! Pgzateuod 041 - uonnIOS OA!113ILIalle UE 103 1!BAA louuuo SUIsnoil gIquploJJV · '1600 JOI~9!4 40nui B le suoydo lomal soleolo gui!130 02essed Defining Low Income as a percentage of Area Median Income • "Low Income" is less than 80% AMI as defined by HUD afIH Xq pougop SE IKV %05 uel[1 ssol s! „gwoouI A~07 K.IOA„ II/Vl/JO 9008 01 °/609 = d!1IS.IOUAiC) OIC[Up.IOJJ~~ . INV %09 01 %Of = SIBJUD-kI POZ!Pasqns • IIAIV %Of 01 %03 = Su!SnoH O!Iqnd - 8 UO!100 S • O Housing Prices vs. Income • Housing prices have been rising five (5) times faster than income in Larimer County. 8 1.1~ pUE JUIOI[ U Jo 00!id 041 uogAUgq deS 0411 • oBUISBolou! s! PIOJJE UED 4!UIEJ B u~op DS.mI B 01 ssoooe qi!Ai somum; osow Aluo • 1setioind 01 pioue ueo luoiuked Powoowl gle 60!P!sqns Su!snoI[30 4!JO [EU[ 1SUA 041 · . dII[siouxio ou[04 ION - SuIsnoII IE}UOI 103 15 lipill/1,~pill":"Illil"/"I'll/"I"'llil"""A 1 1 'gl, 1 1 i..........Age 2/ 32 08 1 co I \ I $ i 1 7 w -Im ER 2 0 1 7 58 c 2 $ 151 JO N N A 2 '4{92.>?A.J.4.-9.]14,€.#4:4.r ' .r.:. ·,.~..j.4-4.·· 2·~'~6;,- ' Ec 33 - 7 ~Lawj:~.F'.2~..1·41.A~.".w.,5.-1..,.:-. <6.i'%...:..:, .i. m e 4>4 -0 91. - 23 - 04 ~2* a3 r lili 22 CD 1 11 1 717~n 0 11 1 1 i 1 1 1 addlmmutig L---- 1 xr 06ue43 % PERCENT CHANGE IN AVERA GE FOR ALL INDUSTRIES VS. PERCENT CHANGE IN A<[EDIAN PRICE OF A SINGLE F HOME IN SELECTED MARKET AREAS, 1992-1995 04811 JeAUaO 20% ~ _ 9965166K auoll *lule, 815uls Jo 80!Jd umpau u fuello %O 966l-Z66& se!4snpu le Joi 96e A 96eisAe u! efuello % 0 991¥ 45% lunuuy 'saNDAA puo lauu,Koidu,3 01,1,10100 '57101773'8 jo pieOE[ Aunoo lopinog 'lossess¥ AUno3 SI@MOId 'SNO,LUVE[H Jo uoucposs¥ Opooloo :32*Inos 22% '0IqupEAE lou OJOM Sue!polu sU S@!lunoO lopinoEI pue SloA\Oid loj posn 01@A\ SONEJOA¥ 'f66/ puv 2661 'SaND.13Ay 39% MOLAKAVOOLA Cht-Cher)-0009 t.-- c.4- rt- ro- ri- c.4- Ch Wch 00 1 7 00 6 01 N 000©Lnoort NC\101--c\1-4-4 64 64€6€6 69 69 69 66 69 0 MOO 00 ~o Crt M . . 01=1-Ch r-O =1- € Of OF 0% r- 0-0 uM N N 01 p- 64 69 de 66 64 U 60 4 N A. t 06 9 .C UES•ORk CS -O =A N 2 E .~ :2 9 0 3 b -1 09 COOU 44 6 U - 0 U <m©(Eg.3~8 @QW1% .. The Estes Housing Market • County Price 1997 AvE. Price 1998 Adarns $ 174,835 $ 184,280 11,990 683'Itt $ L917'603 $ LEO'ZOE 9L0'E6 I $ IOAUOC[ 041 u! 29BIOAE 041 uet# 1048!4 % 5 '6 018 >Iled solsE[ u! SOOLI 0L9'£LI $ 023'6*Z $ 'AUnO'j JOIULIBq U841 1048!4 %9' 2 12 -0 -8 Vl U 2 -0 4 ©71 UDC' u C ce -6 CS 04 0 CA E > E u- 9:v 2-0 13 EE Moo ' < E 4 ~ ES E- C Z U 1 1 ©d i l l Ill Aluo SuIsnoH Imug-21 - supolo xei 01 quo suIsnoH IEluo-H - Supuuu!£[ uouoruisuoo idiuoxi[-x muo d mo ou[OH - SOBEBUO]N luOUBULIDd adulox d!46 JOUAAO JUI 04 1011 SOAREpl UIOU dioq - soln-H VHI The Tools of Affordability • Universal S sidies - Private and Public nations - cash or land atements - tap fees, permits nd pUE OJEATId - 60!P!sqns d!4SJ0UAAO OUIOH . Klunoj pue olms - gouels!ssv luouIKed amoti lad slsoo oinlon.nse.uu! pue puel SlgAAOI - 4!suga - ies - Public U cood 8. 44 - -2 5-%2 030 TEB 01 prj 4-4 01 00 29» = 0 lilli < .. Measuring Home Ownership Costs ike rental housing, the cost of home ownership is comprised of many variables. idulaxo-xul JO IBUO!}UDAUOO - S 'Iqu!!BAE luotuK Sonp S,JOIIA~OOUI DOUE @IquITEAE 00UBWISS gleA!.Idio onqnd - sluEIS Jo so!P!sqns I[seo - Su!snoq KIWUOU[ U Olu! OUIqu~00 60IqUIINA OSOI[l LLId :POHEO luouiked What is PITI? • P = Monthly Principal Reduction • I = Monthly Interest Payments soxuLL owls) Iuo-H XII{luOIN =i · joueinsuI KIqluoff =I • lugl KIWUOUI 01 luDIBAInbo 041 s! 1600 Il,Id Kiqluou[ oqi • 1snui d!qsloubio OU[oq olqeploiIN BUIssoippe Konod Kuv · ION - 41!qupiOJJE Jo uo!1!uuop sl! u! ILLId uo snooJ 00!.Id Oseqoind 4 4 ..) bl .. Why Affordable Home Ownership? It gives each resident a vested interest in the community, a provides equity accumulation, tax benefits and asset appreciation - a stepping stone to future housing. ssol 'sopeiS ialloq - 4!un 4!UIBJ 103 uo!}upunoJ H sop!A pod!04 Oq ueo sa!1!UIEJ glOUI - SOI sqns ssol lej SolInboi lI ride of ownership - a foothold. '4!UnLUUIOO jO OSUOS E - 00BId u! Xpeolle O.Ie gouels!sse luouIKed umop JOJ SLUE.Ijold • B s! puu loduoip s! dII[SJOUMO OU[OI[ - INTIOP IOJ IBITOCI · 'SURUO.I UBI[1 OARBU.IMIE SU!snoq poi[OJOid First Time Home Buyers • Includes divorced adults who may have previously owned a home jointly with former spouse. • Frees up rental units in the community. . 00.IOPIJOA< DIquls 8 104 uourpunoJ B soP!AOId • OUIOI~ JO loppEI 041 U! SUn.I 16.Ig Oql Soleol) 0 ed!qsioukio .dII[SJOUAiO JO „U[BOICI UUOUOU[V „ 041 suoddns · ~„sonIEA 4!U[U £[„ JO UORBULIOJ 041 suoddns • Renting vs. Owning · If monthly rental payments are equal to monthly PITI, then ownership is less expensive because: OSESTIOUI Jo uononpoi ledjouTid - uoquiniunooe Kunba - uople!00.Idde sloallsol OSP!*[ 011[PI!1 - uo!1Epoidde loss¥ - Dles-01 OARBInoods ON - SOU!!OPInS IP\[V u!41!AA Jq 01 SJOUMOotuoil Joi Uo!1Onpop 16010}U! SNI - sluouoq xei - 8 60}Bolo i[0!4Ai - luou[Woll su!28 Ieladeo Imoods 103 0Iq!%!13[ - '4!unuiuioo mil Jo oinlry 041 u! Ovls 088 2 96 OR O :*4 2 M O F) O -: * 9 : 6 !5! ~c- 0 1,1 2 Z* 64 €4 40> 64 A 53 2 e N 3 *N003 20 - 0-id=2.20 f 8% 41 0,- V. /2 22 64 €3 C Ro 020 8 R o .f Re=83£ 20 88 6000 B O 88 4= = Le- =2 71 z » E : 2 -: Eg === NmE 3&- 254 EE Ro g O 6< . 39b~8. Mt*@80[8 2 8**8~$09 0 00 M LOOZ> ul Lri Ut -2 to ..1 2 Z ic 14- 0 4 0- 0 St e~ 2 64 64 go g E® 5 88-8 -0 0 ag C! 0 8 gi: 2900 M 89226 8%06 §~ Ul 00 0< E ~ ze 5 1-_:. g 0'z P o 80--22 Z» 2 : .8 2 1 1% 6, i - a 0 82,0 U) 64 te = 2* 0% 3 SE c c E 9 J » O 0 gu) 80 0 82288%0 g.1 .2.*i F 6%90 O f=688%0 8 00@do'z 0 -C ao q<o:.9-do,z g~ *-2 -- ef, -' 18 .2}ov b 10 .; T -t fe te u, 4 12 64 - ® > cz> 00 - 1 64 > te v, C m Z <50 (D 2 0 E %5,~i; g Ef@12% 0 -m A E 0 U) 02822.%% 4 0 2 0 2 3 i 1 4 Z .- 5.8 k 5 .8 Z 19 H gS'KE&82't, (1) 60-JOLOM 0 .6- o m 7 0 -- b M 0 .2 0-EN MO[1 0# 1- 0-5/ m O & O H ,- a. FAMILY OF TWO 80% AMI 70% AMI 65% AMI 60% AMI 55% AMI 50% AMI ce of Home $124,500.00 $124,500.~0 $124, 00.00 $124,500.00 ent Assistance $12,~24.30 138.75 BSIDY 13.60 $31,921.80 $43,263.75 00-091'9£$ 22-2== 09'£8£'09$ 008ZVLE$ 00990'92$ 0091£'Z:$ AGIS8 $23,430.00 ment 1,500.00 $1,5 0.00 $19,297.50 'dr~pubys~:len~:;esi~~aendce~ in addition to -eiqel!EAE lON eie S}!paJO Xej ejejs pue lejepe:I esneoeq seoj U104 euloo Jsnul eldulexe S!41 u! se IV\'V %09 Im %99 kIno:1 :10 AllINV=I 00.00 jueLUXe 0099 00002'8$ eoue}siss¥ lu HOME OWNERSHIP SUBSIDIES 01qel!EAe eJE Se!P!sqns,e410 J! Aluo Ivy q pe,auo eq ueo d!4SieUMO euloq eiqep,ouv eu,opul X14;UOIN SSO.19 60 %8£ Home Ownership Segment 86eSpo 8686uovy of Home Protecting the Subsidies • The subsidy provided for the initial purchase stays with each dwelling unit for use by the next buyer. jies-01 0AIWInoods luokold suo!10!llso-H luEUOAO~) pue pooc[ · okl!1041ny Bu!snoH e Kq pokoidde oct Il!.Ivi soles-0-N • 'S.IBOX ~£ JOJ POUTEJUIBUI 018 SUO!10!11601 4!1!quployv · uodn BuTIPAIP 4080 oseqoind 0114%!i seq Kl!1041nv Su!snoH · popod iroX o £ IB!liu! 041 Jo pug 041 le @les-31 UD 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 2 0..0 =1 50 R0 5,2 0 € 99 $11 U 04 = <ce<ce .. • Any policy meant to support affordable housing must home ownership must focus on PITI Summary '00!Id oseqoind 041 lou - Supnoq jo 1600 Apnqu sou!10PmS lueljoid goeiqUIO :KIouiBU '0 lels 041 1110 IINV %09 01 9/6017 - 108·Iul SuIsnoH Ii,luo-H - IW-V %08 01 %09 - 10&.Iul d!1[SiOUAAO JUIOH - : 0113 4UnO j JOUI!113,-1 u! sou!IOP!nS atuoou! UIntiI!XEIN · Su!snoil Imual 104 OUIOOUI 441uow Ssol{) jo %0 £ - dIi[SJOUMO OUIOq JOj OUIOOUI KIqluOIN ssolo JO %8 £ - address both rental and h P. -t- 2334 1/ . , .Fl ut~fa ilbl ' l \ 91...7... EXIM i. i 4 V Josep 1 Carpenter • Hourly Wage - $15.00 • Married, 2 Children • Annual Income - $31 200 EIO'I$ - Il,Id XETAI - IIAIV JO %09 · 000'9171$-OUIOHJolsoj e 009' 11$ - ®!sqns luoiuked umoa • HNON - 4)!sqns 00!ld • OBUSNOIN idiuoxz[ xul • i~ fli~HiIili~ilidelliEISEFFEEBEEFF:":"/",''.Ill Wt>l>:A,0/0 Estes Poice Officer • Salary - Grade 3 - $32,520 • Marital Status - Married 1 Child • 67% ofAMI - Max PITI - $1018 006'6£1$ - OUIOHJO 1Soj . 178£'8$ - ®!sqns luou[Xed umoa • HNON - X11!sqnS 00!Id • OBUSNOIN 1dmox'EL xei • I . Z 0 Young Couple 09 'ZES - OUIOOU! lu!Of · • His salary - New teacher - F/T - $24,960 ($12/hi) • Her salary - Receptionist - P/T - $7,800 ($7.50/hr 930 1$- I.LId XEIN - IIAIV %9L · 006'6EI $- OUIOH JO ls*) . 176L'LS - 4)!sqns luowked umoa • N - @!sqnS 00!·Id • 02881.IOW Ole-ZI OIQU JsnfPV 0 Single Mom • Annual Income $22,320 - $ 10/hr plus $3600 child support • 52% AMI - Max PITI - $708 • Cost of Home - $109,900 56' II$- 4!sqns luou[Xed umoa • 006'173 $ - 4?!sqns 00!Id • OSESUOIN 1dmoxi[ Xei • OU[Oq Op!Aold ol s! 1! linOUJIP kioll smolls @Idiuexo s!iIi • 018 02.IBI S!41 so!P!sqns osneooq ILAV %09 *coI@q d!4 S.I@UMO .Su!snoll lujUOI 103 OIquI!BAE X[fia h« t , A., 1 1% 9 i Coupie with 1 chi-d • His Salary - $22,880 - Bank Employee - Full time • Her Salary - $10,720 - Nurses Aid - Part Time 009' £ ES - OILIOOUI POUIC[UIOj . f90 IS- IJ=Id XEIAI - IP\IV %OL · 006'6 EIS- ou[OHJolsoj . 966'9$ - wssv Xed UAAOG . HNON - @!sqnS DOLId • OSESUOIN 1duuoxi[ xel • . .3. »I~q - --=~ O' 11 . • tier balary ba,/ /1 - Substitute Teacher • Combined Salary - $ 39,975 • 75% AMI - Max PITI - $1266 000'917 I $ - OUIOH JO 1Soj . • Down Pay Assist - $5,075 HNON - ®!sqnS 00!ld • ¥3~i ./ - ../ .71' ...... I /- 1 t 4 OSEBUOTAI O}u~H giquisnfpv · Se--f Emfoyed Fami-y of Four • His Income - $34,645 - Small Business Owner • Her Income - $0.00 • Combined Salary - $ 34,645 L60 1$- IiId xep\I - IIAIV %99 • 000'9171$ - OUIOH JO 1Soj e OSE'LS - 16!ssv Ked UMOG . HNON - AmsqnS 00!ld •