The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1998-11-10If . 4. '1 Prepared 11/5/98 The Mission of the Town of Estes Park is to plan and provide reliable, high-value services for our citizens, visitors, and employees. We take great pride ensuring and enhancing the quality of life in our community by being good stewards of public resources and our natural setting. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, November 10, 1998 AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated October 27, 1998. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, November 5, 1998: 1. Celebrate Estes - Horse-drawn Hayrides - approval 2. Municipal Building Generator - Authorization to purchase. B. Planning Commission, October 20, 1998 (Acknowledgment only). C. Board of Adjustment, November 3, 1998 (Acknowledgment only). 4. Mayor: Open Public Hearings and ask if there are any persons who would like to speak on the following plats. If not, they will remain on the Consent Calendar. A. Public Hearing: Amended Plat of Lots 12, 13, and 14, Block 1, Fall River Estates, Lienemann, Goff, Harrison & Jobe/Applicants. No action. Applicant to request placement on future agenda. B. Public Hearing: Final Plat of the Amended Plat of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, Arapaho Estates Third Filing, Robert Koehler/Applicant. C. Public Hearing: Amended Plat, Lot 1, Block 3, Lone Pine Acres, Murphree, Brown, Gordon, Metchem/Applicants. D. Public Hearing: Amended Plat, Lot 3, Acacia Acres Addition, Stephen Murphree/Applicant. 3 . ACTION ITEMS: 1. Public Hearing: Year 1999-2000: A. Highway User's Trust Fund, 1999-2000 B. Resolution #18-98 - Setting Mill Levy, 1999 C. Resolution #19-98 - Adopting Budget, 1999-2000 D. Resolution #20-98 - Appropriating Sums of Money, 1999- 2000. 2. Liquor Licensing A. Public Hearing: New Liquor Store License, filed by Paul Sauerzoph, dba Rocky Mountain High Discount Liquor, 214 E. Elkhorn Avenue. 3. Public Hearing: Rezoning Request for Lots 2, 3 and 16, Ranch Meadow Subdivision, Richard H. Wille Trust/Applicant. 4. Public Hearing: Amended Special Review 97-02, Lots lA and 5A, of the Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Lee and Alps Addition and of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, Lynn W. Kinnie/Applicant. 5. Town Administrator's Report: A. 1 , . I Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, October 27,1998 Minutes of a Regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County,Â· Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the 27th day of October, 1998. Meeting called to order by Mayor Robert L. Dekker. Present: Robert L. Dekker, Mayor Susan L. Doylen, Mayor ProTem Trustees Jeff Barker John Baudek George J. Hix Lori Jeffrey William J. Marshall Also Present: Rich Widmer, Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Mayor Dekker opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and introduced Rooftop Rodeo President Gary O'Connor and Special Events Director Linda Hinze who acknowledged receipt of the 1998 Cowboy's Choice Award for the Rooftop Rodeo Committee presented by the Mountain States Circuit. This is the fourth award the Committee has earned for the past five years, out of a field that includes such large events as Cheyenne Frontier Days, Greeley Stampede, etc. President O'Connor commended the Town Board, local merchants and accommodations for their support. PUBLIC COMMENT: Patrick Cipolla stated that at the previous Town Board meeting, he requested an immediate moratorium on zoning changes and annexations until new zoning laws have been established. The Town's response is illogical. A moratorium, at a minimum, is a temporary solution to a long standing problem, and at a recent EVPC meeting, Commissioner Disney encouraged EVPC members to follow the Comp Plan. Mr. Cipolla urged the Board to act on his request. Mayor Dekker expressed the Board's appreciation to Mr. Cipolla for his comments, adding that any conclusions on the zoning regulations will be made public when appropriate. TOWN BOARD COMMENTS: Pursuant to Wendell Amos' presentation concerning expansion of the Larimer County Weed District at the last meeting, Trustee Hix presented a Resolution of Support and moved it be adopted. Attorney White read Resolution #17-98 supporting Larimer County Referred Issue lA for the expansion of the Larimer County Weed Control District and associated mill levy increase from .142 mills to .190 mills. Trustee Marshall seconded the motion. Trustee Baudek stated, that while he is not in favor of creating more districts, this issue is clearly needed to help prevent additional damage. The motion passed unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board Minutes dated October 13, 1998. 2. Bills. . Board of Trustees - October 27, 1998 - Page 2 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Works, October 15, 1998: 1. Approval Of Change Orders for the following projects: Big Horn, Phases I and II, Big Thompson, and Devil's Gulch, for a total budget expenditure of $10,683.50. 2. Approval of H.T.E. Fleet Management System, for a total budget expenditure of $32,000.00. 3. Approval of Flow Meter for Glacier Water Plant Rehab Proj ect, for a total budget expenditure of $6,000.00. B. Community Development, October 22, 1998: 1. Museum: Acceptance of Construction Bid for restoration of Cobb-Macdonald Cabin - total budget expenditure of $7,500.00. It was moved and seconded (Hix/Jeffrey) the Consent Calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Presentation of Year 2000 Issues relating to the Electric Industry - Thaine Michie and Mike Dahl/Platte River Power Authority. PRPA General Manager Thaine Michie and Mike Dahl/Manager of Operations expressed their appreciation to the Board of Trustees for their support, and commented that PRPA is celebrating their 25th year-PRPA' s income is up and expenses are down. Mr. Dahl gave a presentation on Y2K Issues, giving an overview of PRPA's initiative on determining, testing, and solving potential compliance issues. PRPA has established 4/1/99 as their goal for compliance, and staff is confident they will meet their goal. Brief discussion followed on the unational grid" and how the grid affects Estes Park, growth, the recently installed fiber optics system, and the SCADA system. Mayor Dekker thanked Messrs. Michie and Dahl for their presentation, wishing Thaine well on his upcoming retirement. 2. Presentation of Talmey Drake Community Survey Results - Paul Harstad. Administrator Widmer introduced Paul Harstad of Talmey Drake. This is the fourth survey conducted by Talmey Drake, and Mr. Harstad, and his colleague Amy Hainer, presented survey results gathered between 8/24/98 and 9/3/98 from 405 Estes Valley residents. Specific survey results for each question were reviewed. As the Town has opted to conduct this survey on a regular basis, Talmey Drake has compiled a significant data base of actual information. Respondent information: 9% have lived in Estes Park less than 2 yrs., 19% between 2-5 yrs., 21% between 6-10 yrs., 26% between 11-20 yrs., 15% between 21-30 yrs., and 8% over 30 yrs. Quality of life, growth, housing, and parking were the "volunteered" top issues facing Estes Park. The large screen theater was opposed as well as relocating Town/Police offices. Of those respondents that either called or visited Town Hall to ask a question and discuss a problem (35%), the rate of responsiveness was: 35% excellent, 33% good, 18% fair, and 14% poor. Copies of the complete survey will be available in the Administrative Office and Public Library. The Mayor acknowledged receipt of the survey results, expressing the Board's appreciation for the thorough presentation. . Board of Trustees - October 27, 1998 - Page 3 3. Ordinance #20-98 - Short Term Rentals. Mayor Dekker acknowledged the meeting held September 24th where testimony was offered by the public, and Attorney White gave a historical perspective on how the ordinance was prepared. In the mid 80's, the Town hired a professional consultant and amended the Zoning Code. Numerous public hearings were held, recommendations were made, the Code was drafted, and, following additional hearings, recommendations were forwarded to the Planning Commission and Town Board. At no time were there any discussions concerning short term rentals. In a private discussion, Attorney White noted that Planning Commission Chairman Sager confirmed his (White's) recollections. Short-term rentals were not discussed until recently, staff believes that the definition for transient rentals is where nightly rentals should be placed-under the Commercial accommodation definition. Local realtors challenged the definition based on their opinion that the definition of a dwelling unit was different than an accommodation with a kitchen; as the dwelling unit definition was removed from the commercial accommodation, nightly rentals could not be restricted. Trustee Baudek noted that the ordinance presented this evening contained the latest revisions; however, he prefers the original business license fee of $50.00 for five units or less in lieu of the proposed fee of $150.00. Trustee Baudek based his suggestion on a reasonable fee on existing fees for accommodation units ($150.00 for 1-5 units). Trustee Barker disagreed stating that he preferred the unbiased fee of $150.00 currently assessed to accommodations with no more than 5 units, as the rentals would be operated as a business, generating income-all would be treated equitably. However, should the Board of Trustees desire to revisit the entire business license issue, he would support such review. Attorney White confirmed that the proposed ordinance does include property zoned E-Estate, and that at the present time, there are no restrictions on any property, and adoption of the ordinance would place some restrictions. Trustee Marshall expressed concern with enforcement and in maintaining the residential character of neighborhoods. Trustee Doylen stated that there are many neighborhoods that have covenants in place to preclude this type of use; it is important for residents to communicate with and be civil to each other; in her opinion, the rental of one unit is not Â· the same as a full-fledged B&B or small accommodation, and a fee of $150 is extremely high. Responding to Trustee Marshall's question on public input from those residing in the County, Trustee Baudek confirmed that at the public meeting, public comment was split 50/50; however, adoption of the ordinance would only affect those persons residing inside Town limits. Trustee Barker questioned why B&B operations were being considered differently, and Trustee Doylen questioned how the Assessor views nightly rentals. Attorney White responded that the Assessor views any rental property for more than 14 days to be classified as commercial. Trustee Barker countered that nightly rentals would then be considered a commercial business, and he correlated potential increased public services due to implementation of this ordinance. Mayor Dekker commented that individual neighborhoods can further restrict their areas if the ordinance is adopted. Attorney White clarified land use issues for the entire valley relative to the Board of Trustees - October 27, 1998 - Page 4 Development Code, adding that there has been a request that nightly rentals in E-Estate be prohibited as an accessory use. Trustees Hix and Barker supported discussion on this issue being addressed in land use considerations. Attorney White read the ordinance. Trustee Doylen stated that with the exception of the $150.00 fee, she supported the ordinance, adding that the fee was disproportionate. Trustee Barker reiterated what makes the short term rental operations different than any other business? Trustee Baudek moved Ordinance #20-98 be approved with an amended license fee of $50.00, with the understanding that short term rentals will be further reviewed during the overall zoning review. Trustee Doylen seconded the motion, and it passed with the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Baudek, Doylen, Jeffrey and Marshall. Those voting "No" Trustee Barker and Hix. The ordinance will take effect 1/1/99. Attorney White added that Larimer County does not have legal authority to require business licenses. Mayor Dekker stated that property owners must make application for short term rentals, Pay the fee, list the number of bedrooms, and obtain a State Sales Tax license. 4. Town Administrator's Report: A. The Board reviewed a memorandum dated October 27th from EPURA Executive Director Anderson concerning the Mountain Discovery Center. EPURA has narrowed the search to two firms, and both have the financial capability for this project. Town Administrator Widmer reported that, when all financial feasibility reports are refined, EPURA will prepare a plan to present to the public. Mayor Dekker confirmed that the Town Board is also unaware of the figures, and EPURA has a significant amount of work to do before the Town Board can approve the project. Staff contends that the Talmey Drake survey results on this issue could have been negative due to the lack of public information. B. Acting upon the Town Board's goal to facilitate "assisted living", staff will present their findings on the Masonic Lodge proposal to the Town Board for their evaluation. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dekker adjourned the meeting at 9:29 p.m. Robert L. Dekker, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk BRADFOROPUILISHING Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee November 5, 1998 Committee: Chairman Marshall, Trustees Baudek and Hix Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Widmer, Chief Repola, Fire Chief Dorman, Construction Managers Sievers, Deputy Clerk van Deutekom Absent: None Chairman Marshall called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. POLICE DEPARTMENT Celebrate Estes: Stanley Village Association requests approval for Aspen Lodge Livery to provide horse-drawn during the Celebrate Estes weekends of November 28th and 29 th and December 5th and 6th. The hours will be approximately 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (weather permitting) and Aspen Lodge will be required to provide the proper insurance coverage. Pick up points are at Taco Bell and the Transit Center and the route is on Elkhorn Avenue. Chief Repola confirmed there have not been problems with these rides in previous years. The Committee recommends approval of the hayrides and route as noted. Generator - Authorization to Purchase: The current 10KW generator used as a back-up power supply for the Police Communications/Dispatch Center is substantially undersized to handle the amount of power needed during emergencies. Platte River Power Authority tested our system and recommended switching to a 50KW generator. Construction Manager Sievers began researching replacement options in 1996. At that time it was estimated that it would cost approximately $60,000 to purchase and install a 35KW generator. Since then, Construction Manager Sievers has been able to locate a 50KW unit at a much lower cost of $30,000. The replacement cost of a new generator was budgeted in 1998. Staff recommends approval of the purchase and installation of a 50KW generator at a cost of $30,000. Additionally, the cost will be equally split between Light and Power, Public Works, Water, and Police. The existing generator and switching gear will be relocated to the L&P Service Building. The Committee recommends approval of the purchase of a 50KW generator at a cost of $30,000, funded as identified above. The Committee commended Construction Manager Sievers on his laborious efforts to increase the capacity of the generator and also to substantially reduce the purchase price of a new generator. Physical Agility Testing: In June of 1998, the Estes Park Police Department (EPPD) initiated a process to measure the physical fitness abilities of its sworn officers. This project was initiated in the interest of encouraging healthy lifestyles for the officers, as well as ensuring an officer's physical fitness for duty. In August, officers participated in physical agility testing with the Larimer County Sheriff's Department (LCSD). All participating officers of the EPPD completed the agility test within the prescribed time limit and there were no injuries. Additionally, the average time for Estes Park officers was well under the cut-off score recommended for the LCSD. Testing was not presented as a pass or fail situation and a time-frame for compliance may be established for future testing. EPPD will most likely continue in partnership with both LCSD and the Ft. Collins Police Department for agility testing. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - November 5, 1998 - Page 2 House Addressing - Update: A recent Police Department survey of house address numbers (streets selected randomly) concluded that 69% of the house numbers were visible from the street. An Ordinance was adopted requiring individual properties to be designated with a street address. Compliance was noted on or before December 31, 1997. The Ordinance was intended to assist Police/Fire/Ambulance personnel in locating residences quickly. Since these emergency personnel continue to have difficulty locating some residences, suggestions were made to possibly assist them in their efforts. One suggestion was to send a follow-up letter to any resident whose house was difficult to locate. Another suggestion for public notification of the Ordinance was to place a note directly on customer electric bills. The Committee directed Chief Repola to research options to raise public awareness of this significant safety concern and report his findings at the next committee meeting. FIRE DEPARTMENT Mission Statement: Fire Chief Dorman requested approval of the Fire Department's Mission Statement: "The Mission of the Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department is to provide the people of the Estes Valley with fire prevention, fire protection and other emergency services in a safe, efficient manner." The Committee endorsed the Mission Statement as presented. Confined Space Rescue Class: Pursuant to CIRSA requirements, Platte River Power Authority will be teaching a Confined Space Rescue Class on November 21, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. This class is available to any Town department or organization at no cost to the participants. Sprinkler Head Recalls: Underwriters Laboratories recently issued a recall of the Central Sprinkler Company "Omega Series" sprinklers. Fire Chief Dorman requested that the Trail Gazette publish a warning to the public of this recall. The Fire Department can also be contacted regarding this notice. REPORTS NIBRS Third Quarter Results: Police Chief Repola reported on the 3rd Quarter NIBRS Crime Summary Report. The report included statistics from 1996, 1997, and 1998. It was noted that a few counterfeit $20.00 bills have been discovered locally. The Committee will receive an annual summary NIBRS report at their January meeting. Burglary Prevention/Intervention Efforts: The Committee reviewed a burglary report for September and October. A total of 10 burglaries occurred - 1 residential and 9 commercial. Five burglaries were solved, resulting in a 50% solve rate. Correspondence Report: Officers Roth and Peck and Police Chief Repola received correspondence praising their efforts. Letters of Recognition were given to Officers Rose, Swallow, van Deutekom, Kenney, Alberts, Leaycraft for their outstanding work on recent burglary cases. There being no further business, Chairman Marshall adjourned the meeting at 9:05 a.m. %<f vam ALN lad>u A - 1 4 --- Rebecca van Deutekom, Deputy Town Clerk DRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission October 20, 1998 Conunission: Chair Al Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Stephen Gillette, Alma Hix, Edward Poht and David Thomas Attending: Chair Sager, Commissioners Burgess, Gillette, Pohl and Thomas Also Attending: Trustee Liaison G. Hix, Town Attorney White, Senior Planner Joseph, Building Official Birchfield, Recording Secretary Botic Absent: Commissioners Brown and A. Hix Chair Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. 1. Minutes of the September 15, 1998 meeting were approved. 2. SUBDIVISIONS a. Final Plat of the Amended Plat of Lots 3,4,5,6 and 7, Arapaho Estates Third Filing, West End of Cherokee Drive, Robert F. Koehler/Applicant. This is a request to divide Lot 5 into two lots (creating one new building lot) and to create an Outlot for access to the adjoining lots. Applicant's representative, Ross Stephen, stated the Final Plat reflects the Preliminary Plat conditions; 99% of the utilities are in place and the road has been paved. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the Staff Report recommending approval with conditions. There were no audience comments. It was moved andseconded (Pohl/Burgess) the Final Plat of the Amended Plat of Lots 3,4,5,6 and 7, Arapaho Estates Third Filing, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees subject to the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. A draft access maintenance agreement for the shared private drive shall be made available prior to Town Board. 2. The design of the road in Outlot A-1 shall avoid point discharge of drainage onto adjacent lots. 3. The dedication statement shall berevised asperMr.White'smemo dated October 12, 1998. 4. As-built utility construction mylars shall be submitted and approved by Public Works prior to Town Board approval. 5. Vicinity map needs to be corrected to reflect the replatted area. b. Amended Plat, Lot 1, Block 3, Lone Pine Acres, NE Corner of Lone Pine Drive & Raven Avenue Intersection, Stephen E. Murphree, F. Ross Brown, Ronald J. Gordon, David K. Metchem/Applicants. This is a request to divide Lot 1 into two lots for construction of a zero lot line duplex, resulting in one single family residence per lot. This proposal qualifies as a Minor Subdivision (16.12.070). Applicant's representative, Kerry Prochaska, stated the ISO calculations have been completed and will be forwarded to Town Staffand Fire Chief Dorman. Mr. Prochaska stated the building will face south and that the most limiting conformance to this property would be a zero lot line development. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the Staff Report recommending approval with conditions. There were no audience comments. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Burgess) the Amended Plat, Lot 1, Block 3, Lone Pine Acres, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees subject to the following conditions, and it passed unanimously. 1. ISO calculations will be provided. 2. A note be added concerning approval of zero lot line development, as per Mr. White's memo dated 10/12/98. BRAOFOROPUSLISHINGCOÂ· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' Estes Park Planning Commission - October 20, 1998 Page 2 c. Amended Plat, Lot 3, Acacia Acres Addition, NW Corner of Acacia Drive & AvalonDrive, StephenE. Murphree/Applicant. This is a request to divide an existing lot (Lot 3) into two lots to separate the ownership of an existing duplex to a zero lot line duplex, resulting in one single family residence per lot. This proposal qualifies as a Minor Subdivision (16.12.070). Applicant's representative, Kerry Prochaska, reviewed the request explaining the building is constructed so the units may be sold individually, Applicant is in agreement with Staff recommendations with a request for clarification of the electric service requirements. The fire wall is in place through the altic to the roof and meets the UBC requirements. Senior Planner Joseph explained his reasoning regarding the meter location noting 'west' should be revised to 'east' and reviewed the StaffReport which recommends approval with conditions. There were no audience comments. It was moved and seconded (Burgess/I'homas) the Amended Plat, Lot 3, Acacias Acres Addition, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees subject to the following, and it passed unanimously. 1. An additional water service linewith meterand tap feeshall beprovided. The tap fee and a separate water line shall be guaranteed prior to Town Board approval. 2. Compliance with UBC requirements shall be verified with on site inspection performed by Town Staff prior to Town Board approval. 3. The note identifying Acacia Road shall be corrected to read Acacia Drive. 4. The existing driveway shall be placed in an access easement with this Amended Plat. A shared access and maintenance agreement shall be provided prior to Town Board Approval, and shall be recorded together with the Plat. 5. A new electric service and meter shall be provided for the east unit and an easement provided for any line that crosses the neighboring lot. 6. A note shall be added concerning approval of zero lot line development, as per Mr. White's memo dated 10/12/98. d. Preliminary Plat, Sleepy Hollow Subdivision, A Portion of the South M of Section 22, TSN, R73W, of the 6th P.M., Fall River Road, West of Trails West Lodge & Black HawkLodge, Gary D. Connely, Tejas IncJApplicant. This is a request to divide 48.05 acres into 10 SingleFamily Lots, Outlots A and B as Open Space and Outlot C (Access, Utility, Drainage). Applicant's representative, Kerry Prochaska, stated thisrequestwaspreviously approved by Planning Commission 3th years ago and due to litigation resolved in January 1997, it is before the Commission this date (the previous approval's time has expired). The request is modified as required in the Court decree (14' along the northern boundary ofLots 7 and 8)leaving a 48 acreparcel. Mr. Prochaska has spoken with Mr. Barker (TrailsWestLodge) regarding the access easement. Hc has not spoken with Mr. Wallace (Black Hawk Lodge) yet. Mr. Prochaska has spoken with staffregarding the shared driveway and utilities. The ISO is shown on the Preliminary Plat, the bridge is per CDOT requirements ( 12'). An 8' fire truck would be able to utilize the bridge as well as an emergency access through Homestead. Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the Staff Report noting the same proposal was approved in 1995. Writtencorrespondencewasreceived from Jim Tawney/ Ponderosa Lodge who is opposed to the proposed development. Mr. Joseph has spoken with Mr. Harris regarding drainage issues which are addressed with anote on theconstructiondrawings. Mr.Josephcalled attention to the 10/14/98 Memo from Public Works Director Linnane which has many important comments and to a 10/18/98 letter from Scott Dorman/Fire Chief. Mr. Joseph noted that in study session it was suggested that in the future the future homeowners may request public street maintenance which will not be possible unless the public right-of-way is dedicated. Staff recommended BMADFORD/UILISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - October 20, 1998 Page 3 approval with conditions. Audience comments: Darwin Stark: questioned the location of his property inreferenceto the proposal, open space and drainage. Staffand Commissioners responded, and Mr. Prochaska stated that there would be no drainage onto Mr. Stark'sproperty. JimTawney/Ponderosa Lodgeowner,stated approvalofthe proposal would negatively impact his property, hc has offered suggestions to change the development, and has also offered to buy the property. He noted the west exit is not useable as it is chained. There is a 120' x 8' strip of land dedicated for parking in the Court Order. Mr. Joseph stated he had misread the Court Decree regarding Mr. Tawney's parking and dumpsterlocation inrelation to the proposed paved road. Mr. Prochaska stated a survey has been done with property corners previously identified and that Mr. Tawney's parking area/dumpster location is entirelyin Outlot C and the Applicant willresolve and modify this issue in compliance with the Court Order. Mike Wallace/Black Hawk owner, stated he would not be willing to dedicate public right-of-way, his road will remain private. Chair Sager stated that there were no corner stakes, flags or identifying markers on the property and while realizing this is not a requirement, noted if they were in place, they would assist Commissioners. Discussion continued regarding revising the Staff recommendations, building the road toTown standards, the parking/dumpsterlocation and whether theitem should be continued, and if requested information could be ready for the November 17,1998 meeting. It was moved and seconded (Pohl/Thomas) the Preliminary Plat, Sleepy Hollow Subdivision, A Portion of the South 1/2 of Section 22, TSN, R73W, of the 6th P.M., be continued to the November 17, 1998 Planning Commission meeting so that the following items may be provided and/or resolved, and it passed unanimously. â€¢ Legal documents provided to Attorney White for his review. â€¢ Explore possible public dedication of right-of-way. â€¢ Identify proposed property corners â€¢ Access road and Ponderosa Lodge parking and dumpster locations to be identified on road construction drawings. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN a. Amended Development Plan 92-01, Lot 1, Timberlane Subdivision, Timberlane Lodge, 740 Moraine Avenue, Curtis and Patricia Thompson/Applicants. This is a request to provide a lower level under four remaining buildings to be constructed as shown on the original site plan (Buildings A-6, A-7, B-5, B-6). Senior Planner Joseph reviewed the Staff Report recommending consideration be given to the angled parking spaces and referred to the Public Works Director Linnane's Memo. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Applicant'srepresentative, Bill Van Horn, requested the Commissioners and Staffaccept his verbal request for a time extension with this amendment. The Applicant will apply for a building permit immediately upon approval, however, ifthere is a delay, additionaltimewillberequired. The Appliicant is in agreement with Staff recommendations, uses will be restricted and the additional space is not intended for rental units. The suggestion for the ramp will be incorporated byproviding fora landing and relocation ofahandicap space for direct access and reflected with revisions on the plan. Also, the angle of the parking spaces will be altered. Commissioner Thomas questioned the mechanisms in place with regards to additional guests for family reunions who would not be on-site guests and Mr. Van Horn considers this an internal problem important to the Applicants as they must provide parking to their paying guests. Commissioner Pohl noted a discrepancy on the Plan regarding the notes identifying completion dates. Discussion continued regarding the handicapped parking spaces and parking. Mr. Joseph suggested the Plan be clearly labeled if INADFOROPUBLISMZCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' Estes Park Planning Commission - October 20, 1998 Page 4 the Commission agrees to a time extension and the conflicting notes be eliminated. It was moved and seconded (Poh]/Gillette) the verbally revised Amended Development Plan 92-01, Lot 1, TimberIane Subdivision, Timberlane Lodge, 740 Moraine Avenue, be approved with the following conditions, and it was approved unanimously. 1. Use of any of the proposed lower levels (Buildings A-6, A-7, B-5, B-6) as guest units or dwelling units shall be prohibited. 2. Use of the meeting rooms shall be restricted to guests residing on the property. 3. Notes shall be added to the plan sheet identifying the upper and lower level uses of the proposed buildings. 4. Atime extension is granted with thisapproval. Building permits must be obtained before September 1, 1999. This approval will expire on this date, and no building permits will be issued for this development after this date without first renewing Development Plan approval. Other conflicting notes regarding time frame will be eliminated. 4. SPECIAL REVIEW a. Amended Special Review 97-02, Lots lA and 5A, of the Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Lee and Alps Addition and of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, located in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, TSN, R73W, of the 6a P.M., South and West of the Donut Haus and North of Fun Trax, Lynn W. Kinnie/Applicant. This is a request for a time extension for removal of a building/shelter that encroaches into the river setbackand thepublic accesseasement. Chair Sageropened the Public Hearing. Senior Planner Robert Joseph stated that one of the conditions of approval for the new miniature golf course was for the removal of a building/shelter. The CertificateofOccupancy was issued thissummerwith theunderstanding thatthe structure could remain until fall so that business operations would not be disrupted during their busy time. Public Works Director Linnane made his comments based on the information that money was not budgeted to construct a walkway in 1999. Mr. Joseph recommended the request be denied and the building be removed as was originally agreed. He stated there is potential conflict with the future access easement and the structure does not conform to the riversetbacks. Applicant'srepresentative, BillVan Horn, stated Mr. Kinney would like to thank the Staffand the Town for the consideration given this past summer. The Applicant recognizes Staffs position, there is no question the building will be eliminated when the walkway is in place. The Applicant has attempted to beautify the river, removal will not facilitate public good, the structure does provide shelter at this time. Commissioner Pohl questioned the Applicant's open-ended time frame request and the hardship if structure is removed. Mr. Van Horn stated the shelter protects the air pillows and end of the spiral slide fromthe summer rains. Lon Kinney responded to Chair Sager's questions regarding removal of the slides. Mr. Kinney stated he and his father are open to suggestions for a different use. They are aware the bumper car building encroaches into the setback and anticipate that will be resolved with future redevelopment. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Pohl stated there was considerable negotiation between the Town/EPURA and the Kinnies; this is an opportunity to correct an encroachment into an easement, the request of an open ended time extension is not in the community interest and it was moved and seconded (Pohl/Burgess) to recommend denial of the Amended Special Review 97-02, Lots lA and 5A, of the Amended Plat of IAts 1 and 2, Lee and Alps Addition and of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A and 9, Prospect Village Subdivision, located in the NE 44 of the SW lA of Section 25, T5N, R73W, of the 68 P.M., request to reconsider condition of approval (building removal) to the Board of BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Estes Park Planning Commission - October 20, 1998 Page 5 Trustees, and it passed with the following voles. Those voting "Yes"- Commissioners Burgess, Gillette, Pohl, Thomas, those voting "No" - Chair Sager. Chair Sager stated he was willing to work with the date suggested by Public Works Director Linnane. 5. REZONING a. Proposed Rezoning for Lots 2, 3 and 16, Ranch Meadow Subdivision, West of Lone Pine Acres and North of Grand Estates, Richard H. Wille TrusUApplicant. This is a Zoning change request from C-O, Commercial Outlying to R-M Residential, Multi-family. Senior Planner Joseph stated he had received a letter dated 10/19/98 from the Applicant's representative, Bill Van Horn, withdrawing Lot 1 from the original request, however, Staff still recommends denial of the request as it is in conflict with the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan. He requested Applicant respond to Public Works request concerning drainage. Mr. Van Horn stated Mr. Wille has observed a troubled history with commercial uses and with the significant increase in commercial activity in this neighborhood, the commercial nced has been met. The Applicant may request Development Plan approvalprior to implementation ofthe EVDC. The Applicant does not believe there are sufficient people to support commercial ventures. Mr. Van Horn requested flexibility and preserving Applicant's rights. He stated Lot 1 will be developed forMulti-Familybuildings with less mass than the current developed buildings. Audience comments: Pat Cipolla stated this is the primary reason he requested a moratorium on rezonings and suggested this will be valuable commercial property to be preserved at this time. Ralph Nicholas suggested Mr. Wille use his creativity for this property rather than requesting rezoning (a future grocery store, a new post office site). Mr. Van Horn requested Mr. Wille be given the freedom to choose how to develop his land. Commissioner Burgess observed the definite need for commercial land. Recognizing the comments heard today and referring to the Staff Report comment "preserving commercial zoning for commercial uses is particularly important for land located along major arterial highways," it was moved and seconded (Thomas/Burgess) to recommend denial of the proposed Rezoning for Lots 2, 3 and 16, Ranch Meadow Subdivision, from C-O, Commercial Outlying to R-M Residential, Multi-family, to the Board of Trustees, and it passed with the following votes. Those voting "Yes" - Commissioners Burgess, Pohl, Sager, Thomas, those voting "No" - Commissioner Gillette. Commissioner Gillette stated Mr. Wille can submit development plans for Multi-Family by the next meeting and denying this request is not responsible government. 6. REPORTS 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 4:05 p.m. 92Â©ta,uu) 4Â· 2551-3 Roxanne S. Botic, Recording Secretary BMAOFOROPUILISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Board of Adjustment November 3, 1998 Board: Chair John Baudek, Members JeffBarker, Lori Jeffrey, Wayne Newsom and Al Sager Attending: Barker, Jeffrey, Newsom and Sager Also Attending: Director Stamcy, Building Official Birchfield and Recording Secretary Botic Absent: Chair Baudck Vice-Chair Sager called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. MINUTES The minutcs ofthe October 6, 1998 mecting werc accepted as prescnted. LOT 3. LAKE VIEW TRACTS. 1000 BIG THOMPSON AVENUE. KIMBALL BEERY/APPLICANT- VARIANCE REOUESTFROM SECTION 17.20.040 (b) (1). OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. This is a request to reduce thc required 25'wide planting buffer adjacent to Highway 34 to a width of 5' to 10', for additional parking. At the Applicant's request this item was continued from the October 6, 1998 Board of Adjustment meeting. Applicant Les Bccry stated when this land was purchased in 1993 a Site Plan was submitted. At Staff s suggestion thcgradewas modified and parking concerns with regard tolocation was not addressed. Mr. Been, requested relief as the building is on a hill, he does not anticipate CDOT widening thehighwayand believes this variance would alleviate safety/trafficconcerns. Landscape would be added to allow for visual screening. Mr. Bcery stated there are many businesses along Highway 34 which are not in compliance with the setback requirement and enforcement to his property would be discrimination. Kerry Prochaska, Applicant's representative, noted the siteconstraints -Estes Park Sanitation sewer line for which Applicant has granted an easement. He stated it is impractical to move the sewer line and grades were modified in the original development, and due to safety and five years of working experience a need exists for relief. Director Stephen Stamey read the Staff Report (dated 09/29/98) prepared by Senior Planner Joseph. (Mr. Joseph was unable to attend due to a training commitment.) This Memorandum outlined the development history of the site, and pointed out that site development options could have bcen incorporated both the buffer and parking alternatives. Supporting documentation (Staff report dated 07/14/93 and Planning Commission Minutes dated 07/20/93) were also presented by Mr. Stamey. Chair Sager emphasized Municipal Code sections 17.24.010 and 17.24.020. Mr. Bcery referred to the same documents noting they did work with Staffs suggestions. Discussion continued with Mr. Becry, Mr. Prochaskaand Commissioners regarding the sewer line, location of buildings on this site, other buildings along the highway that werc built prior to current standards, safety incidents, and Commissioners noted the requirements to grant a variance. It was noted that The Apenzell has bccn built to current sctbacks standards. Stating the conditions have not been sufficiently met to grant a variance and noting the original design could have been altered to provide alternative parking, it was moved and seconded (Barker/Jeffrey) to deny the setback variance request for Lot 3, Lake View Tracts, 1000 Big Thompson Avenue, and it passed unanimously. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' Board of Adjustment - November 3, 1998 Page 2 Chair Sager noted the platform and furniture currently displayed at this location is in violation of the zoning ordinance and the tenant has been advised. Mr. Sager requested Mr. Beery's (landlord/property owner) attention to this matter. REPORTS - None There being no further business, Vice-Chair Sager adjourned the meeting at 8:32 a.m. c,Ram,t Â£ 34. 499&r 3 Roxanne S. Botic, Recording Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey Community Development Director DATE: November 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Final Plat of the Amended Plat of Lots 3,4,5,6, and7, Arapaho Estates Third Filing CONSENT AGENDA Background: This is a request to adjust the boundary lines among five existing lots, and split one of those lots, creating one new building lot. This subdivision proposal also creates an Outlot (A-1) for a common private access driveway to four lots. An access and maintenance agreement for this driveway has been prepared, and will be recorded concurrently with the final plat. The plat conforms with the Town's zoning and subdivision standards. Planning Commission recommendations have been addressed. ARAPAHO MEADOWS S| TE_TRACT~~~ZZE~Zf -41,i/ //A \ \ ARAPAHA L-\ ~ l AsIBId \ luz:d 1 YbY 1, 4 j/AR+PA00/ 77\*-?1 \ *V 2& /by' bER-~~97-~ 4'122] TRACT 6 VICINITY MAP Recommendation Approval of the Final Plat of the Amended Plat of Lots 3-7, Arapaho Estates, Third Filing. MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey Community Development Director DATE: November 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Amended Plat, Lot 1, Block 3, Lone Pine Acres, NE Corner Lone Pine Dr. & Raven Ave. CONSENT AGENDA Background: This is a proposal to divide an existing lot into two lots. The site is zoned R-M, Multiple Family. The resulting lots would allow for one single family dwelling on each lot, either as separate freestanding units meeting all applicable setbacks, or as one zero lot line duplex (common side line) as allowed by the zoning regulation. The existing lot is large enough to allow for construction of one duplex. There is no increase in density allowed. The subdivision meets the minimum lot area requirements and subdivision standards. Planning Commission findings have been incorporated. i --1 1 1 1... _1_ - i -- f 21[,i.[4411.*6&/... /~/ ' -441: 111431 1 / SITC , 94 .....#&40 , LOGAT'ON \-211 -1,01-10 .. 1 .,.,/77:11:// j , =62â„¢Â·luw M C ADO,bol 11 ,/ 1 -24-: 4.1.3Â£4 6 1 9 " c...,. Sue rk , .%5'Ir--Â·221:.i:;:1, 1. flÂ·.\ , 1 ;1{ %41 . I JY, .: 100 . 1% --' LAa=~-:--E STES 1 \ c:,41.4 - 1 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Recommendation Approval of the Amended Plat, Lot 1, Block 3, Lone Pine Acres. MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey Community Development Director DATE: November 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Amended Plat, Lot 3, Acacia Acres Addition NW Corner of Acacia Dr. & Avalon Dr. CONSENT AGENDA Background This is a proposal to divide an existing lot into two lots to separate the ownership of an existing duplex. This would result in one single family dwelling unit per lot, in a duplex configuration, with a zero side lot line, in accordance with Town regulations. The proposal meets the required minimum lot area standards, and complies with the subdivision regulations. Planning Commission recommendations have been incorporated. ~44- 91 Â·-'Â»'Ii--VAWÂ»-18~197 / ' Icou:k-/L, tr- .~-Er,9--\ 1-11\Z#.9,2'_:'.'IU frfU/'/.1' 1. Â·:.1,0 1. r. 1.1,1- l.,7. 1 N Â·IÂ·I'lÂ·TT 1,1.1 Â· 1,4,4,4,1 '..1 4 .LAre-R ./A. I ... -- 1. . 4 'U-L .,c. 0 , ,-...Dfl -- ... 0,1 .. . ]1I ... t.;1 <V / â€¢tatâ€¢ .t 7 4, , 6 ... 1. SITE 7 JLOCATION ~5 -- '-I . 5 . 4. I . - I- 1, .. , , : ,â€¢ - # .. 4 , 1 , â€ž .4 / > 1 . 1 / \.. 1 r. . .-- . 1 0. I ..2 S '1 . ,. â€ž1â€žIll . 161.7 E VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Reconunendation Approval of the Amended Plat, Lot 3, Acacia Acres Addition. f NEJ TOWN OF ESTES PARK 9 1 -234 e /.5,9:.,1'de.&#24%2 1106 - ,= ./.,rÂ«41Â£4â€¢m.fah*jmt - .Ae,AN. \. _-* 4 .PpÂ· 4 .Di,%,'-wa,/,6 1/ 9~310>,/Â·,: ~.*917:9'.1, '.1.44 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Trustees FROM: Monte L. Vavra, Finance Officer DATE: November 10, 1998 SUBJECT: Highway Users Trust Fund Public Hearing, 1999/2000 Budget November 10, 1998 'olorado budget law requires a public hearing be conducted to discuss how the Highway Users Trust Fund revenues are proposed to be expended in the ensuing fiscal year. The following are the proposals that are included in the 1999/2000 Town of Estes Park Budget: 1999 2000 1. Estimated Revenues: $216,080 $224,725 2. Estimated Expenditures: Curb/gutter repair 5,000 5,000 Hwy 34/36 Phase I (net of grant) 284,000 0 Sidewalk maintenance 10,000 10,000 Traffic calmers 5,000 5,000 Resurfacing/overlay 200,000 200,000 $504,000 $220,000 In addition, expenditures for snow plowing, street maintenance, or any other expenditures directly related to streets are allowable uses of Trust Fund revenue in the event that either of the above-listed projects are not constructed or come in considerably less than budget. (970) 586-5331 Â· RO. BOX 1200 Â· 170 MAC GREGOR AVENUE Â· ESTES PARK, CO 80517 Â· FAX (970) 586-2816 RESOLUTION TO SET MILL LEVIES A RESOLUTION LEVYING GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE YEAR 1999, TO HELP DEFRAY THE COSTS OF GOVERNMENT FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO FOR THE 1999 BUDGET YEAR. WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park will adopt the annual budget in accordance with the Local Government Budget Law on November 10, 1998; and WHEREAS, the amount of money necessary to balance the budget for general operating expenses is $195,900; and WHEREAS, the 1998 net valuation for assessment for the Town of Estes Park as certified by the County Assessor is $72,323,200. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: That for the purpose of meeting all general operating expenses of the Town of Estes Park during the 1999 budget year, there is hereby levied a tax of 2.70865 mills upon each dollar of the total valuation for assessment of all taxable property within the Town for the year 1999. That the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to immediately certify to the County Cominissioners of Larimer County, Colorado, the milllevies for the Town of Estes Park as hereinabove determined and set. ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1998. Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk iV RESOLUTION TO ADOPT BUDGET A RESOLUTION SUMMARIZING EXPENDITURES AND REVENUE FOR EACH FUND, AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR BEGINNING ON THE 1 ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1999, AND ENDING ON THE LAST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1999, AND FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR BEGINNING THE FIRST DAY JANUARY, 2000, AND ENDING ON THE LAST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2000. WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park have appointed Richard D. Widmer, Town Administrator, to prepare and submit a proposed budget to said government body at the proper time; and WHEREAS, upon due and proper notice, published in accordance with the law, said proposed budget was open for inspection by the public at a designated place, a public hearing was held on November 10, 1998, and interested taxpayers were given the opportunity to file or register any objections to said proposed budget; and WHEREAS, whatever increases may have been made in the expenditures, like increases were added to the revenues so that the budget remains in balance, as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That estimated expenditures for each fund are as follows: 1999 2000 General Fund $11,173,753 $9,633,193 Community Reinvestment Fund 255,519 321,995 Museum Fund 182,075 227,660 Conference Center Fund 668,690 575,855 Conservation Trust Fund 45,000 20,000 Special Events Fund 649,635 613,797 Senior Center Fund 111,633 117,771 Larimer County Open Space Tax Fund 192,538 198,725 Park Entrance Estates Construction Fund 3,718 0 Park Entrance Estates Debt Service Fund 21,000 20,100 Light and Power Fund 8,872,047 11,381,211 Water Fund 2,659,945 2,519,337 Self-Funded Medical Insurance Fund 209,600 230,600 Fleet Maintenance Fund 204,096 231,190 Firemen's Pension Fund 61,250 61,250 Policemen's Pension Fund 2,566 2,566 TOTAL $25,313,065 $26,155,250 Section 2. That the estimated resources for each fund are as follows: 1999 2000 General Fund: From unappropriated surpluses $2,002,676 $1,100,308 From sources other than general property tax 10,075,485 9,196,783 From the general property tax levy 195,900 203,735 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $12,274,061 $10,500,826 Community Reinvestment Fund: 471,784 1,291,640 Museum Fund: 204,186 227,665 Conference Center Fund: 676,585 584,730 Conservation Trust Fund: 54,324 33,024 Special Events Fund: 662,691 627,411 Senior Center Fund: 104,489 117,771 Larimer County Open Space: 206,230 213,282 Park Entrance Estates Construction Fund: 3,718 0 Park Entrance Estates Debt Service Fund: 23,886 20,101 Light and Power Fund: From unappropriated funds 3,245,739 1,906,521 From other revenue sources 7,532,829 10,931,490 TOTAL LIGHT AND POWER FUND 10,778,568 12,838,011 Water Fund: From unappropriated funds 2,012,758 1,721,153 From other revenue sources 2,368,340 2,429,265 TOTAL WATER FUND 4,381,098 4,150,418 Catastrophic Loss Fund: 288,648 293,433 Self-Funded Medical Insurance Fund: 347,285 342,535 Fleet Maintenance Fund: 269,478 264,382 Firemen's Pension Fund: 871,874 931,649 Policemen's Pension Fund: 22,966 20,900 GRAND TOTAL $31,641,871 $32.457,778 Section 3: That the budget, as submitted, amended, and herein above summarized by fund, be and the hereby is approved and adopted as the budget of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, for the year stated above. Section 4: That the budget hereby approved and adopted shall be signed by the Mayor and Town Clerk and made a part of the public records of the Town. ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1998. Mayor ATI'EST: Town Clerk RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE SUMS OF MONEY A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING SUMS OF MONEY TO THE VARIOUS FUNDS AND SPENDING AGENCIES, IN THE AMOUNTS AND FOR THE PURPOSES AS SET FORTH BELOW, FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, FOR THE 1999 AND 2000 BUDGET YEARS. WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has adopted the annual budget in accordance with the Local Government Budget Law on November 10, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has made provision therein for revenues in an amount equal to or greater than the total proposed expenditures as set forth in said budget; and WHEREAS, it is not only required by law, but also necessary to appropriate the revenues provided in the budget to and for the purposes described below, so as not to impair the operations of the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: THAT the following sums are hereby appropriated from the revenue of each fund, to each fund, for the purposes stated: General Fund: 1999 2000 Current Operating Expense . . $9,041,843 $9,171,190 Capital Outlay. ....... 2,131,910 462,003 TOTAL GENERAL FUND ......... $11,173 ,753 $9,633,193 Community Reinvestment Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 145,519 121,995 Capital Outlay. ....... 110,000 200,000 TOTAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND. . . 255,519 321,995 Museum Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 148,275 145,460 Capital Outlay. ....... 33,800 82,200 TOTAL MUSEUM FUND. .......... 182,075 227,660 CONFERENCE CENTER FUND: Current Operating Expense . . 518,690 575,855 Capital Outlay. ....... 150,000 0 TOTAL CONFERENCE CENTER FUND ..... 668,690 575,855 Conservation Trust Fund: Capital Outlay. ............. 45,000 20,000 Special Events Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 548,935 558,497 Capital Outlay ....... 100,700 55,300 TOTAL SPECIAL EVENTS FUND. ...... 649,635 613,797 Senior Center: Current Operating Expense ........ 111,633 117,771 Larimer County Open Space Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 192,538 198,725 Capital Outlay. ....... 0 0 TOTAL LARIMER COUNTY OPEN SPACE FUND . 192,538 198,725 Park Entrance Estates - Capital Fund: Capital Outlay. ............. 3,718 0 Park Entrance Estates - Debt Service: Current Operating Expense ........ 21,000 20,100 iqht and Power Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 7,378,854 7,801,471 Capital Outlay........ 1,493,193 3,579,740 TOTAL LIGHT AND POWER FUND ...... 8,872,047 11,381,211 Water Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 1,882 ,695 1,855,037 Capital Outlay. ....... 777,250 664,300 TOTAL WATER FUND. .......... 2,659,945 2,519 ,337 Self-Funded Medical Insurance Fund: Current Operating Expense. ....... 209,600 230,600 Fleet Maintenance Fund: Current Operating Expense . . 201,096 200,690 Capital Outlay. ....... 3,000 30,500 TOTAL FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND ..... 204,096 231,190 Firemen's Pension Fund: Current Pensions. ............ 61,250 61,250 Policemen's Pension Fund: Current Pensions. ............ 2,566 2,566 GRAND TOTAL $25,313,065 $26,155,250 ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1998. Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk July 1997 PROCEDURE FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION NEW LIQUOR LICENSE MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on the application of Paul Sauerzoph, dba ROCKY MOUNTAIN HIGH DISCOUNT LIQUOR, for a New Retail Liquor Store License located at 214 E. Elkhorn Ave. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the facts and evidence determined as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type and availability of liquor outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consideration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed. This public hearing will be conducted in the following manner: â€¢ The applicant will be allowed to state his case and present any evidence he wishes to support his application. The opponents will be given an opportunity to state their case and present any evidence in opposition to the application. * The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal limited to the evidence presented by the opponents. No new evidence may be submitted. The opponents will be allowed a rebuttal which may only rebut the evidence of the applicants. No new evidence may be offered. * The Board of Trustees may ask any questions of any person speaking at any time during the course of this hearing. TOWN ATTORNEY. Will present the application and confirm the following: * The application was filed October 6, 1998. 0 At a meeting of the Board of Trustees on October 13, 1998, the public hearing was set at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, November 10, 1998. The neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of this application and hearing were established to be 3.07 miles. The Town has received all necessary fees and hearing costs. â€¢ The applicant is filing as an Individual. â€¢ The property is zoned C-0 which allows this type of business as a permitted use. â€¢ The notice of hearing was published on October 30, 1998. * The premises was posted on October 13, 1998. â€¢ There is a police report with regard to the investigation of the applicant. 0 There is a map indicating all liquor outlets presently in the Town of Estes Park available upon request. MAYOR. 0 Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application, and if so, to read all communication. â€¢ Indicate that all evidence presented will be accepted as part of the record. â€¢ Ask the Board if they have any further comments or questions. 0 Declare the public hearing closed. SUGGESTED MOTION: Finding. The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are/are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are/are not for the granting of this liquor license. Motion. Based upon the above findings, I move that this license be granted/denied. DR 8404 (07/97) Page 1 COLORADO DkPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION COLORADO LIQUOR 1375 bHERMAN STREET OR 3.2% FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE DENVER CO 80261 RETAIL LICENSE APPLICATION El NEW LICENSE m TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP m LICENSE RENEWAL â€¢ ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPEWRITTEN â€¢ APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) â€¢ LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ â€¢ APPLICANT SHOULD OBTAINA COPY OFTHECOLORADO LIQUOR AND BEER CODE(Call 303-321-4164) DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 1. Applicant is applying as a Â® Individual U Corporation El Limited Liability Company El Partnership (includes Limited Liability and Husband and Wife Partnerships) 01 Association or Other 2. Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Paul Sauerzoph 2a.Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone Rocky Mountain High Discount Liquor 24-85948-0000 (970)586-nGan 3. Addrres of Pemises (specify exact location of premises) 214 E. Elkhorn Ave. P.O. Box 385 City County State ZIP Code Estes Park Larimer Colo 80517 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town State ZIP Code P.O. Box 385 Estes Park Colo 80517 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following questions: Present Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Class of License Present Expiration Date N/A N/A N/A N/A SECTION A APPLICATION FEES LIAB SECTION D LIQUOR LICENSE FEES O Late Renewal Application Fee................................ $500.00 1940 iii Retail Liquor Store License (city) ........................$202.5 521 Application Fee for New License .............................. 650.00 1940 0 Retail Liquor Store License (county) ..................... 287.50 2300 U Application Fee-New License Concurrent Review.... 750.00 1950 1 Liquor Licensed Drugstore (city) .......................... 202.50 2310 Â¤ Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership ............... 650.00 1950 1 Liquor Licensed Drugstore (county) ..................... 287.50 SECTION B 3.2% BEER LICENSE FEES 1960 Il Beer & Wine License (city)...................................326.25 2121 Â¤ Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (city) ................,....,$71.25 1960 El Beer & Wine License (county).............................. 411.25 2121 O Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (county) .............,..,..92.50 1970 U H&R License C] city Ocounty .........................475.00 2122 U Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (city) ........................ 71.25 1980 Â¤ H&R License w/opt Prem D city Il county ...... 475.00 2122 El Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (county) ................... 92.50 1990 0 Club License Clcity C]county............................283.75 2123 El Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (city) ..................71.25 201(k O Tavem License 0 city Il county........................ 475.00 2123 U Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises- (county) ,.,......,...92,50 2020 0 Arts License []city []county.............................283.75 2030 0 Racetrack License C]city Dcounty....................475.00 SECTION C RELATED FEES AND PERMITS 2040 O Optional Premises License 0 city m county...... 475.00 2210-100 (999) Â¤ Retail Warehouse Storage Permit ...................... $75.00 1905 D Retail Gaming Tavern Lic El city Il county........ 475.00 1980-100 (999) Â¤ Addition of Optional Premises to existing hotel/restaurant 1975 E Brew-Pub License 725.00 $75.00 x Total Fee 1970-750 (999) O Manager's Registration (hotel & restaurant only) ... $75.00 Il Other No Fee O 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises Only Delivery Permit No Fee Â® Retail Liquor Store Delivery Permit DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY LIABILtTY INFORMATION License Issued Through County City Industry Type License Account Number Liability Date (Expiration Date) State City County Managers Reg -750 (999) 2180-100 (999) 2190-100 (999) 1970-750 (999) lif~ Cash Fund Now License Cash Fund Transfer LIciny TOTAL 2300-100 Â·Â· 2310-100 (999) (999) DR 8404 (07/97) Page 3 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stock- Yes Ne holders or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? 00 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation) or manager ever (in Colorado or any other state); (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? m (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? El D (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? m El If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8a. Has a liquor license application (same license class), that was located within 500 feet of the proposed premises, been denied within the preceding two years? If yes," explain in detail. C] El 8b. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been denied within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. El El 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or private school that meets compulsory education requirements of m El Colorado law, or the principal campus of any college, university or seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any m gl current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 2 of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that this license will be issued by virtue of ownership, lease or other arrangement? 94 El El Ownership El Lease El Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Landlord Tenant Expires Lee Kemper Paul Sauerzoph May 1999 Attach a diagram and outline the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, brewery, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11 ". (Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who, besides the owners listed in this application (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies), will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME DATE OF BIRTH FEIN OR SSN INTEREST N/A Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement, or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc.) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises Yes No A local ordinance or resolution authorizing optional premises has been adopted. Â£ 453 Number of separate Optional Premises areas rpqi,Asteri N/A 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Yes No Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. N/A 08 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and 00 not for pecuniary gain? (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is E gl operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? (Three years required) N/A 16. Brew-Pub License Applicants answer the following: (a) Has the applicant received or applied for a Federal Brewers Notice? El gl (Copy of notice or application must be attached) N/A Date of Birth Hotel & Restr. Lic. 17a. Name of Manager (lf this is an application for a Hotel Yes No and Restaurant License, the manager must also submit an Individual History Record (DR 8404-1). m 62 17b. Does this manager act as the manager of, or have a financial interest in, any other liquor Yes No licensed establishment in the State of Colorado? If yes, provide name, type of license and account number. N/A 0 18. Tax Distraint Information. Does the applicant or any other person listed on this application and including its partners, officers, Yes No directors, stockholders, members (LLC) or managing members (LLC) and any other persons with a 10% or greater financial interest m 621 in the applicant currently have an outstanding tax distraint issued to them by the Colorado Department of Revenue? If yes, provide an explanation and include copies of any payment agreements. N/A DR 8404-1 (02/94) MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY COLORADO D&PARTMENT OF REVENUE INDIVIDUAL FINGERPRINT LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET CARDS OBTAINED FROM THE DENVER CO 80261 POLICE DEPT. INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business Date Social Security Number(s) Unrky Mnlint,in High Di Arniint, T,i qiinr 10-07-98 461-86-6962 2. Your Fult Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) Ranprznnh, Pal 11 4. Mailing Address (itdifferent from residence) Home Telephone P.n. anx 385 Estes Park Colo 80517 (970)586-0125 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 461 Birch Ave 6. Date of Birth Place of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? 3-16-48 Saugreties, New York Â® Yes U No If Naturalized, state where When Name of U.S. District Court N/A N/A N/A - Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate If an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number N/a N/A N/A n/A 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Driver's License? If yes, give number, & state 5' 9 180 Brown Hazel Male Cau E Yes [3 No92-204-9583 Colo Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment imbre Hair DeA igng Barher/Stylist 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) Business Telephone 214 East Elkhorn Ave Esteq Park, enln 80517 (970)586-0500 13. Present Position Owner- Stylist 14. Marital Status 15. Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) Single N/A 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spousd's Place of Birth N/A N/A 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) N/A 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation n/A N/A 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer N/A 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER N/A Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail D Yes El No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your driver's license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) If ye:, explain in detail. D Yes 62 No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U,S.? If yes, explain in detail, El Yes .621 No 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge 1966 | 1967 Honorable U.S. Navy 871 7849 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO 461 Birch Ave Estes Park, Colo 7/1/97 2445 Longview Estes Park, Colo 4/4/94 7/1/97 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO Hombre BBrber 214 East Elkhorn Ave Stylist 3/1/93 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate o#icer, director, stockholder, member or manager) Sole Owner 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned N/A N/A 29. If partner, state whether m General El Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) N/A N/A N/A 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount$ $10,000 Approx. 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account ~ Personal Funds Key Bank 12.Wal %~erzoph $ Personal Funds Park National Bank Paul Sauerzoph $ $ Oath of Applicant I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of myMWIG~ge. A AtÂ£#ized Sign:*e ly / Title Date / Owner pk,14 Y 1 1 I ex.Al / TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department './,)4<~I.-'+:17.. --b'y#'Utely Â£7 '29AfÂ¥~>imt# KS. Lim.0 -- i,~, 1&(j.fr~ ~ ,u:21Â¢~ 197-'.~-..4,-.-I~~ /-- 934-*%94 Â·dÂ»%*#921 ,..AL : October 21, 1998 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Rocky Mountain High Discount Liquor Retail Liquor Store (new) Sauerzoph, Paul Ms. O'Connor: A records check based upon the name(s) and date(s) of birth of the above-named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Rocky Mountain High Discount Liquor. Sincerely, Randy Repola Chief of Police RR/psa (970) 586-4465 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (970) 586-4496 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey Community Development Director DATE: November 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Rezoning Request for Lots 2, 3, and 16, Ranch Meadow Subdivision, Richard H. Wille Trust/Applicant Located west of Lone Pine Acres, north of US Highway 34 ACTION ITEM 3. Background These three vacant lots are currently zoned C-0, Outlying Commercial. The applicant has submitted a petition to rezone these lots to R-M Multiple Family. The lots total 3.79 acres (Lot 2 - 1.12; Lot 3 - 1.12, Lot 16 - 1.55). Multi-family development is a permitted principal use in the C-O District, and the owner could develop as such, subject to Development Plan review and approval. Senior Planner Joseph's staff report, and a colored map identifying the area and zoning, are attached. Recomrnendation The Planning Commission, recognizing testimony, and that "preserving commercial zoning for commercial uses is particularly important for land located along major arterial highways," recommended denial of the proposed rezoning for Lots 2, 3, and 16, Ranch Meadow Subdivision, from C-O, Outlying Commercial to R-M Multi-Family, to the Board o f Trustees. The recommendation passed on a vote of 4 (yes) - 1 (no). . ' 4 Community Development Â· ' Memo To: Planning Commission From: Bob Joseph Date: October 15, 1998 Re: Re-zoning request, Lots 1, 2, 3, & 16, Ranch Meadow Subdivision These vacant lots now zoned C-O, Commercial Outlying, indude 8.3 acres total, located along Highway 34. Multi-Family use is a permitted use in the C-O district, and the owner may apply for Development Plan approval for multkfamily development as a conforming use under current regulations. However, the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan has designated this area as G Commercial in the future land use plan, and multi-family use is not expected to be a permitted principal use within this category. The C-Commercial category is described on page 4-8 (chapter four of the Comp Plan) as follows: C-Commercial: A district allowing a wide range of uses, modified with a system of perfonnance standards. Residential uses would be allowed, but not as a principal ground floor use. (e.g. residential uses, if proposed, would be required to be on the second floor of a commercial use). Part of the reasoning behind this provision is that the remaining land with commercial zoning should be preserved for commercial uses to prevent erosion of the commercial base. This consideration is particularly important for land located along major arterial highways. This re-zoning request is in conflict with the Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan, and the request should be denied. â€¢ Page 1 EE a> a> :g :g - 0505 0 E >, 2, #-0 8 1 1 8 .-' 2~ COz 1-1- E 6,4 16 4.// Cld /2 5 ti.2 06 g ~ ----*--c-07 OU12â€ž A 8EEed) 00003 -J 149Â»3 L.c-'.i. i 1 7 . 1 ilillill 1 == ./r. 1 01 :ial. . - November 5. 1998 Board of TrusteeR Town of Estes Park Post Office Box 1200 Estes Park. Colorado 80517 Subject: Estes Valley Comprehensive Plan Dear Trustees: We read that the planning Commission has made the decision not to allow down zoning of present commercial land and this greatly concerns us. We have owned seven acres of commercial land in Estes Park for twenty plus years. We bought this land with the knowledge and assurance that if we decided to down zone at a later date. it would be approved. If you disallow down zoning. it is our opinion that you will be taking away what we originally purchased end now own. We question enyones' ability to make the decision for us and other landowners as to the most desirable use of the land at the time it is ready to be developed. Who knows best what the most desirable use of commercial land will be in the future? As e long time owner of both commercial and residential property in Estes Park. I think it unwise for the Town to place lower limits as well as upper limits on the use of private land. thereby removing all flexibility in the iuture. Thank you for your consideration. Very..truly yours. 4/- I John and Pa Ovr*~ cc: Mayor Robert Dekker MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor Dekker and Board of Trustees FROM: Stephen L. Stamey Community Development Director DATE: November 5, 1998 SUBJECT: Amended Special Review, 97-02, Lots lA & 5A, of the Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Lee and Alps Addition and of the Amended Plat of Lots 5A & 9, Prospect Village Subdivision. West of Crags Dr, South of Donut Haus, (Slide area) ACTION ITEM 4. Background When the Planning Commission and Town Board approved the new miniature golf course on this property, one of the conditions of approval was for the removal of a building that encroaches into the river setback and a public access easement. The owner has requested a time extension for removal of this building, until such time as the Town constructs a walkway in this easement. The building was to have been removed concurrently with the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the golf course, but do to the timing (this summer), staff agreed to allow the building removal to occur by November 15, 1998, so that business operations would not be disrupted. Senior Planner Joseph's staff report is attached, including a map of the site, identifying the subject building. Recommendation The Planning Commission, noting there was considerable negotiation between the Applicant/Town/ EPURA, that this is an opportunity to correct and encroachment, and that the request for an open ended time extension is not in the community interest, recommended to the Board of Trustees that the request to reconsider the condition of approval (building removal) be denied. The recommendation passed on a vote of 4 (yes) - 1 (no). .. 44 Community Development Memo To: Planning Commission From: Bob Joseph Date: October 14, 1998 Re: Special Review 97-02, Request to reconsider condition of approval, (building removal) When the Planning Commission and Town Board reviewed the new miniature golf course proposal in 1997, (special review 97-02), one of the conditions of the approval was for the removal of a building/shelter that encroaches into the river setback and the public access easement. The owner now requests revision of this condition to allow the structure to remain until such time as the Town actually occupies the access easement. The building is currently in use as a part of the slide operation. The request to allow use of the building until the easement is occupied will not present any problerns as far as use of the easement is concerned. However, the removal of this building at this time would eliminate a non-conforming encroachment into the required 30ft. river setback Staff recommends the building be removed at this time as originally agreed. â€¢ Page 1 , .4 SITE PLAN 9 1 Ent 1 8 Tr A :rl \0. 1 1 3 0,2 ~ iN .. 90 CD k 0, Id 1 leg \8~ > 24 ' Ag 49 Gul 0,99 O-30 3%-a 95 1 - Izr ~ c.~ -O m -~ \ g> KS m m g>*04 ~ mr - 0 4 1 00 crt -O m 0109 m mzO~I ~ 01 N O 9 -Ti Z m r- 49 Ar#h /6 Â· 0- '- / AD < EN% -1 CO :CS m F-0-- z . 0 44 ' 0 32' 5% E m g = 10 00 0 MO~mo Â» 04 CPI - E & f-1 + 01 0 L.-1 . U) -71 Z, -0 9 m 7 Cot CroZE 1 11 0O0ut O 2 52 + 4 2 0 1 - om --1 05 1--0 0 94< /97 z - 010 00 z 1 O 0 > -1 Z I N D r/4 i .RJ k E 2 m >m \ b. 3%3 - Ft \ e M Â°30> Al XI Z 0 r TICKE-1- BLDG 0* 1 0=i l -0 30 Z ;0 30 zm J m GO - 50 0 19 . tz .0 .00. s 1 r-A \\\\\ \-- 09 27.00' CRAGS DRIVE BRIDGE DRAWN DATE VAN HORN ENGINEERING SCALE PROJ. NO. 1043 Fish Creek Road - P.O. Box 456 - Estes Park, CO 80517 ALP 8-27-98 Phone: (970) 586-9388 - Fox: (970) 586-8101 1" = 40' 97-1-4 .. 40 N 90'00'00" E -P-A- HIG_HWAY #2 ~ DELUST 4 83Alhl NOSdMIOH-L DIEI 3003 3 .00,LS.Ze S ./2 99 1 3 .9/.9 1 59 S