The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1995-07-11BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK â€¢ Tuesday, July 11, 1995 ' 7:30 P.M. AGENDA Bobbi Thorson, 1995 Rooftop Rodeo Queen and Tami Zahn, 1995 Rooftop Rodeo Attendant. PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated June 13 and Special Meeting June 20, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, June 15, 1995. B. Public Works, June 22, 1995. C. Planning Commission, June 20, 1995 (acknowledgement only). ACTION ITEMS: 1. Resolution of Respect - Byron "Barney" Graves. 2. Steve Jackson/Boudreaux & Jackson - Presentation of 1994 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 3. Public Works Committee, June 22, 1995: A. Preliminary Order Adopting Preliminary Plans and Specifications for the Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District - Approval. B. Rocky Mountain Consultants - Approval of Scope of Services for Fuel Tank Rehabilitation and Site Study, $7,280.00. C. Mail Box Cluster Units - Approval of Budget Expenditure, $23,000.00. 4. Planning Commission, June 20, 1995: A. Public Hearing. Special Review #95-3, Community Church of the Rockies, 1700 Brodie Ave., Community Church of the Rockies/Applicant. B. Public Hearing. Amended Plat of Lots 14 and 15, Crags Subdivision, Sharon Nordic/Applicant. C. Public Hearing. Amended Plat of Lots 7, 8, 25, and a Portion of Lot 24, Block 10, Town of Estes Park, Rex Miller/Applicant. Ca-rl,-4- ~ Jy 35 , 4 1 ,- . D. Appeal of Planning Commission Decision to Deny the p Amendment to Development Plan #94-2, Lot 2A, Amended Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Lone Pine Acres, First Addition, Lester Schmidt/Applicant. Ce"* 1Â»- 9 644.3 25 E. Resolution - Intent to Annex Waterbury Addition, Setting the Public Hearing for August 22, 1995, Referring the Annexation to the Planning Commission. 5. Liquor Licenses: A. Public Hearing. New Beer and Wine Liquor License Application filed by Thomas W. Thomas, dba NOTCHTOP BAKED GOODS & NATURAL FOODS CAFE, 459 E. Wonderview Ave. B. Transfer of Ownership. From Monte Smith to David and Yolanda Oehlman, dba RENDEZVOUS CAFE, 509 Big Thompson Ave., Beer and Wine License. C. Special Event Permit for Longs Peak Scottish Highland Festival, Inc., for event September 9 and 10, 1995. 6. Deed of Dedication to the Town by Stanley Views Limited (The Stanley Hotel) - Acceptance. 7. Town Administrator's Report: A. B. 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, . . JUDe. 13. . . ., 19. . 9.5 poluteâ€¢ of a . .Regular . . meeting of the Board of Truatees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in gaid Town of Estes Park on the . .13th. day of ..... .JÂ¥ne. 0, A.D., 19. . 9.5 at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor ........................, H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Present: Mayor Trusteeg: Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, Stephen W. Gillette, William J. Marshall, Michael E. Miller, Also Presents Gary F. Klaphake, J. Donald- Pauley Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk 86.6,;it/: Absent: None Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:31 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. Louis O'Riordan commented on his separation from the "Citizens for , Moral Government" group and potential grant funds that may be available from P.U.C. With regard to the proposed Fire Station location on a portion of Stanley Park, Fire Chief Rumley confirmed that due to the locality, the Fire Dept., not the Town Board, selected said site. The Department has since withdrawn their recommendation for the Stanley Park site. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated May 23, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Works, May 25, 1995. B. Community Development, June 1, 1995. C. Light and Power, June 8, 1995. D. Board of Adjustment, June 6, 1995 ( acknowledgement only) . 4. Resolution #16-95 - Setting the Public Hearing on July 11, 1995 for a New Beer and Wine Liquor License Application filed by Thomas W. Thomas, dba NOTCHTOP BAKED GOODS & NATURAL FOODS CAFE, 459 E. Wonderview Ave. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Pauley) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. 1995 Christmas Parade Agreement with Connie Boschen - Approval. The Community Development Committee recommended approval of the standard agreement with Connie Boschen for presentation of the 1995 Christmas Parade. The service fee is $10,000 plus $2,500 for construction of the floats. Administrator Klaphake noted that increased production costs are being borne by sponsorships. It was moved and seconded Board of Trustees - June 13, 1995 - Page 2 (Doylen/Marshall) the Agreement with Connie Boschen be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. Interior Wall Addition/Light & Power Service Facility - Approval of Budget Expenditure. The Light and Power Committee recommended approval of the interior wall addition for the Light and Power Service Facility. One bid was received from W. J. Kizer in the amount is $7,125.00; the budgeted amount was $9,000. It was moved and seconded (Pauley/Miller) the bid in the amount of $7,125.00 with W. J. Kizer be accepted, and it passed unanimously. 3.A. Final Plat Of Sleepv Hollow Subdivision. Gary D. Connolv/Applicant. Acting upon the Applicant's request, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Final Plat of Sleepy Hollow Subdivision be withdrawn (pending civil litigation), and it passed unanimously. B. Ordinance #10-95 - Vacation of Street and Utility Easements. Arapaho Estates. First Filing. Town Attorney White reviewed the vacation which was a condition placed on the plat by the Planning Commission. Applicant' s representative Paul Kochevar confirmed that there were no utility easements in Block 2 to be included in the Ordinance. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Doylen) the Ordinance be adopted, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance duly passedand adopted, and ordered it published according to law. C. Final Plat Of Arapaho Estates. Second Filing. Bob Koehler/Applicant. Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing. Administrator Klaphake and Attorney White reviewed the plat, particularly access and the annexation agreement, announced that all Planning Commission items had been met, and the Improvement Guarantees had been received. There being no further testimony, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Marshall) the Final Plat of Arapaho Estates, Second Filing be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4.A. American Legion Post #119 - Special Event Permit for Barbecue scheduled Julv 4. 1995. Trustee Doylen declared a potential conflict of interest and stated she would not participate in discussion nor vote. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Pauley) the Special Events Liquor Permit for the American Legion Post #119 be approved, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Gillette, Marshall, Miller and Pauley. Those voting "No" , none. Those "Abstaining" Trustee Doylen. 5. "Accountability Committee" - Report bv Mavor Dannels. Mayor Dannels stated that due to a citizen's request, staff scheduled meetings for theÂ·public to present items of concern. Four meetings were held where approximately 4 people attended. Two Town personnel were scheduled, and, at the fourth meeting, only one resident attended. Pursuant to the aforementioned, Mayor Dannels curtailed any further meetings of the Accountability Committee. 6. Town Administrator's Report: A. Food Tax Refund Program. A total of 155 applications were filed: total disabled, 17; total seniors, 50; total families, 75. Thirteen applications were denied due to exceeding thd low income guidelines. The "total families" category represented 152 children. Average income by category: disabled, $8,487.59; seniors, $10,862.82; and families, $14,906.54. The total Town i expeRditure was $24,250. The Board must decide whether thiÂ·s program will continue, thus providing funding in the Â· i Board of Trustees - June 13, 1995 - Page 3 1996 Budget. Louis O'Riordan commended the Trustees on this Program, adding that the recipients were very grateful for the refund. Mr. O'Riordan urged the Board to continue the Program. B. Traffic Signal. Elkhorn Ave./Brownfield's. The Town has received many requests to adjust the timing pattern of the new traffic signal. The Town intended a pedestrian- actuated signal; however, CDOT controls all highway signalization. In addition, the signal located at the intersection of Elkhorn Ave./Virginia Dr. must also be reviewed. Staff is working with CDOT to resolve these issues. C. Stanlev Park Campground Usage. Pursuant to a citizen request, staff reviewed a Campground Use Policy as adopted by the Town Board on May 7, 1992. In summary, the campground can be used as a "conventional" campground only after other commercial campgrounds are full. A referral procedure precludes any competition between the private sector and a Town facility. Following discussion, consensus was reached that the Campground Usage Policy would remain intact, without any amendments. D. Fire Station Site. As the Fire Department rescinded their recommendation to locate the new fire station on a portion of Stanley Park, staff has been reviewing other potential sites. Access is a major consideration in any site selection, and staff believes a potential site may be east of the BOR power plant entrance off Highway 36. This site eliminates the significant pedestrian mixture found at the Stanley Park site. Therefore, Attorney White has filed a Letter of Intent with the Bureau of Reclamation. Chief Rumley stated that the majority of the 32 fire fighters are within close proximity of the BOR site which should provide rapid response time. Due to potential liability concerns, the fire station must be relocated out of the downtown area. Trustee Gillette reiterated the Town' s desire to relocate the station out of the core area; and commented on the growth which is occurring outside Town limits, and growth of the Fire Dept. When scheduled, Trustee Gillette urged the public to attend public meetings to express their opinion "upfront." Town Attorney White noted that the BOR has authorized the Town to announce the filing of the Letter of Intent; howevet, no further action is necessary at this time, pending review by the Bureau. 7. Resolution #17-95 - Transferring Funds to the Estes Park Housina Authority. Assistant Town Administrator Widmer reviewed a Resolution that transfers $421,172 from General Fund Grants to the Estes Park Housing Authority for the Lone Tree Apartment Project. Staff read the Resolution, and it was , moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) Resolution #17-95 be approved, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Gillette, Marshall and Pauley. Those voting "No" Trustee Miller. Those "Abstaining" none. Following completion of all Agenda Items, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 8:35 P.M. Board of Trustees - June 13, 1995 - Page 4 'Â·Â·4e Chairman Dannels convened the Estes Park Housing Authority at 8:36 P.M. 1. Resolution #1-95 - Adopt Budget for Fiscal Year 1995 and Appropriate Monies. Chairman Dannels opened the public hearing. Assistant Administrator Widmer read the Resolution. As there was no public testimony, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. Administrator Klaphake reported that, with the consultant, staff is striving to reduce the budget to ,lower the cost of the project. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette, Resolution #1-95 be approved, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Gillette, Marshall and Pauley. ,Those voting "No" Trustee Miller. Those "Abstaining" none. 2. Resolution #2-95 - Authorizing Bank Checking Account. Staff read a Resolution appointing signatories for the checking account (Chairman Dannels and Finance Officer Vavra), and authorizing an investment policy. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) Resolution #2-95 be approved, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Gillette, Marshall and Pauley. Those voting "No" Trustee Miller. Those "Abstaining" none. Staff commented that at the Trustees's goal setting retreat, it was determined that the Town would provide the land, tap fees and building permit fees for an affordable housing project. These funds will be reimbursed to the Town's General Fund by the Housing Authority. Mayor Dannels noted that the Board of Trustees have scheduled a Special Town Board meeting on Tuesday, June 20, 1995 to consider the Manske Addition Annexation. Therefore, the regularly-scheduled Town Board meeting on Tuesday, June 27, 1995 has been canceled. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 8:51 P.M. H. B. Dannels, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk 64 16/ ..2, Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colocado, . . June,2.0 . . .,, 19. .9.5 Minutei of a . .Special . . meeting of the Board of Trust,eu of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . .20th. day of . . . . . .J?ne. ., A.D., 19. .95 at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor ......................... Present: Mayor Trustees: H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, Stephen W. Gillette, William J. Marshall, Also Present: Gary F. Klaphake, Michael E. Miller Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, i Town Clerk ' Absent: J. Donald Pauley, Trustee Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Mayor Dannels called the Special Meeting to order at 4:04 P.M. 1. MANSKE ANNEXATION. Administrator Klaphake stated that pursuant to State Statute requirements, the special meeting was called to meet annexation petition deadlines. The Planning Commission reviews potential annexations as a courtesy and, thus, forwards any recommendations to the Town Board. The Planning Commission met on this date at 8:00 A.M. where they considered the annexation; however, due to subsequent neighborhood concerns with the proposed high-density development, request from County E-Estate zoning to Town R-M Multi-family zoning, and the lengthy Planning Commission agenda, the minutes were unavailable to the Town Board. Administrator Klaphake outlined three options: accept the Planning Commission recommendations; reject the Planning Commission recommendations; or continue the public hearing to July 25, 1995. As there was insufficient information at this time, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall) the public hearing for the annexation of Manske Addition be continued to July 25, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 2. STANLEY PARK DEED RESTRICTIONS/OUIET TITLE ACTION - UPDATE. Mayor Dannels read a statement, which in summary, stated: on May 18, 1995, the Public Safety Committee announced that the Stanley Park site was no longer being considered for a fire station site, and that the quiet title action (filed by Town Attorney White) has been subject to misinformation and misunderstandings. Therefore, Mayor Dannels recommended the Town cease all quiet title action effective immediately. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Dekker) the Town withdraw all Quiet Title Actions filed on Stanley Park, and it passed unanimously. There being no further business, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting at 4:10 P.M. H. B. Dannels, Mayor Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk BRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee June 15, 1995 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: Trustees Dekker and Marshall Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Acting Police Chief Repola, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: Chairman Gillette Trustee Dekker called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT Personnel Hiring -- Update: Acting Police Chief Repola introduced new personnelÂ·: Officer Darren Brand and Dispatchers Lynn Jaramillo and Mark Igel. Seven seasonal officers are presently working weekends and they will convert to full time starting June 24. Directed Patrol Efforts -- Downtown: Acting Police Chief Repola announced that Officers will be highly visible in the downtown area enforcing ordinances and circulating throughout the downtown business community. One area of concern is Riverside Plaza which is attracting crowds and causing an obstruction of the passageway and creating potential safety hazards. The Officers are working with these groups by suggesting alternative locations for various activities. Warnings are initially issued and summons are issued for continual violators. Restrictions regarding bicycles, rollerblades and skate boards were published in a media release May 26. Restricted parking locations, including the Post Office, loading zones, handicapped spaces, and RV parking will be patrolled; violators will be issued tickets. Bike Path Patrol: The new Lake Estes Hike/Bike Trail , encompasses several jurisdictions, each with their own policies. This limits the Police Department authority regarding regular patrolling of the Trail. Youth Center: Acting Police Chief Repola will submit a grant application for funding to organize activities at the Youth Center, including crime prevention and intervention programs. Proposed Cat Leash Law -- Recommendation: Acting Police Chief Repola reported that the Larimer County Humane Society has a program to provide live traps for nuisance animals to residents. Animal Control Officer Thacker presently provides this service on a complaint basis. A cat leash ordinance would require an increase in manpower and equipment. As cat complaints have been few, the Committee recommends no change in the current program. FIRE DEPARTMENT. No report this month. REPORTS. Public letters of commendation were received for Lt. Filsinger, Sgt. Kufeld, Officers Swallow and Schumaker, and Dispatchers Bloxsom and Purvis in reference to a case involving the Pueblo County Sheriff's Department. BRADFORD PUBLISHING COÂ· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee, June 15, 1995 - Page 2 'A tour of the remodeled Communications Cdnter will be conducted following the meeting. There being no further business, Trustee Dekker adjourned the meeting at 9:47 A.M. ~TLc K-U. Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk ' ,....FORIPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee June 22, 1995 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Doylen and Miller ' Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Public Works Director Linnane, Town Attorney White, Manger Sievers, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. , E.V.R.P.D. GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT - APPROVAL. Estes Valley Recreation and Park District (EVRPD) Director Gengler reported that the Board is seeking an amendment to the existing operating Agreement for the Estes Park Golf Course. The District desires to renew the Operating Agreement for an initial five-year period, with an option to renew for an additional five-year period, including automatic one-year renewals following the end of either five-year period. The request is based upon the District's financial long-range planning, added security for lease-purchase agreements, and the security of a long-term agreement with the Town. Attorney White confirmed that there are no benefits to the Town to amend the Agreement as requested. The Committee recommends the Golf Course Management Agreement be returned to the Committee for further discussion, directing staff to supply copies of the original Agreement to Committee members for their review. PARK ENTRANCE ESTATES SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - FORMATION. In a letter dated June 13, 1995, Town Attorney White reported on a meeting held with Park Entrance Estates property owners on May 31 for the purpose of outlining the procedural steps for the formation of the Special Improvement District for special improvement district bonds, and an election on November 7, 1995. A time schedule is as follows: At their meeting July 11, the Town Board would adopt a preliminary order adopting preliminary plans and specifications for the project. The order would include the cost of improvements, together with a map of the District and a schedule indicating the approximate amounts to be assessed upon the lots within the District. At their meeting August 8, the Town Board would adopt an Ordinance authorizing the improvements to be made. The Board would also direct staff to begin the process of placing the bond issue on the November 7, 1995 election ballot. At their meeting September 12, 1995, the Board would authorize the form of the ballot question for the bond issue, adopt any necessary resolutions or ordinances to place the question on the ballot, and determine exactly who would be eligible to vote. (If private placement of the bonds is successful, only those electors within the District would vote. If the bonds are placed in the public market, a Town-wide election would result.) Staff is recommending the Board adopt a resolution indicating that only registered electors who are owners of property within or residents of the proposed District would be eligible to vote on said question. In addition, the original petition did not contemplate water system MRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO ' RECOSD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - June 22, 1995 - Page 2 improvements in Block 1. If the homeowners desire to have the water system improvements in Block 1 included as part of the improvements, a petition signed by 50% of the properties to be assessed for the water system improvements must be filed with the Town on or before July 7, 1995. Attorney White advised that the schedule must be followed if the Town is to meet election guidelines. Public Works Director Linnane reviewed the project and explained that cost estimates have been calculated on the "high end" to ensure sufficient funds are collected; otherwise, should the bids exceed bond fundihg, the entire election process must again be initiated. The property owners should assume they will incur high- end costs. Concerning roadways, it is difficult for an existing subdivision to comply with Town standards, and staff has determined that said standards could be relaxed to: 20' roadways, 134% slopes, and 70' radius curves. Various maps of Park Entrance Estates were displayed which detail staff's plans for the roadways, which include culverts, competent drainage, and asphalt. These improvements will necessitate any utilities in existing roadways to be relocated. Cost estimates for improvements were based upon similar projects, and they are estimated using a 10-year loan with 6-3/4% interest. Attorney White confirmed that the 10-year period is standard. In addition, it must be established that the improvements will increase the value of the property. For comparison purposes, staff prepared the cost estimates providing low and high ranges; however, listed below is staff's summary: Roadway Cost Ranae. Blocks 1 and 2 (low to high cost ranges) $225,000 - $360,000 $7,500/lot - $10,600/lot $1,050/yr. to $1,500/yr. Block 2 Water Cost Rance (low to high cost ranges) $65,000 - $90,000 $6,000/lot - $8,200/lot $900/yr. - $1,150/yr. Block 1 Water flow to high cost ranges ) $180,000 - $275,000 $9,500/lot - $14,500/lot $1,350/yr. - $2,000/yr. The above costs per lot were based upon on less lots than actual. To be safe, the costs per lot will remain the same and the total costs will increase. Also, the above cost ranges do not include tap fees of $4,0001/lot. Director Linnane reported that consultants were furnished the design prepared by property owner Ralph Hopper for water improvements for Block 2. If a property has an existing water tap, they will not be required to purchase another. Staff explained that costs are higher to provide water in Block 1 due to the distance to existing water connection points. Administrator Klaphake commented that a contingency must be included; assessments are based upon "actual costs"; and the low- ' fRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS public Works Committee - June 22, 1995 - Page 3 range costs may be unrealistic. Regarding Block 1 water improvements, Park Entrance representatives noted that unofficially, it does not appear that these specific improvements will be included in the project. Attorney White clarified that Ln order to vote on this ballot question, a person must be a Colorado registered elector. Then, the person must own real property within the District at which the person resides, or a renter, Â· if registered to vote, of property within the District. Concluding all discussion, the Committee recommends (1) staff proceed with preparation of a packet for the July 11 Town Board meeting, and (2) Town Administrator Klaphake be authorized to contact financial institutions to explore the market. LAKE ESTES HIKE/BIKE TRAIL PROJECT - REOUEST APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER. Change Order 002 is a decrease of $4,208.00 as the centerline striping and bollards were eliminated, and the asphalt patching was less than anticipated. Total deductions to date are $9,200.00. The Committee recommends approval of Change Order #002. Due to a scheduling conflict, Chairman Gillette expressed his apology in being absent at the Lake Estes Hike/Bike Trail Ribbon Cutting Ceremony held June 16. The Chairman applauded the efforts of the Town, particularly Bill Linnane, and reviewed the chronology of the Trail beginning in 1993 when Gregg Filsinger, Jr. appeared before the Public Works Committee requesting bicycle paths. A Hike/Bike Master Plan was developed and in November, 1993, the EVRPD, Larimer County, and the Town entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement. The Town submitted an ISTEA Grant and received funding. In January, 1994, GoCo funds were made available and Town was successful in this application. The Town was successful in their grant applications in part, due to the efforts of Trustee Doylen, Director Bill Linnane, Sr. Planner Joseph, and Secretary Kilgore. RMC worked on the design/scope of services and coordination was achieved with the BOR and DOW. The Town was responsible for 79% of the funding for this project, with EVRPD and Larimer County each contributing $50,000. A Hike/Bike Task Force, consisting of Larry Wexler, Gregg Filsinger, Jr., Bill Linnane, and Dan Speedlin, and the Advisory committee consisting of Larry Wexler, Les Foiles, Joan Childers, Amy Plummer, Jerry Donner, Randy Repola, Gregg Filsinger, Jr., Bob Joseph and Bill Linnane were also , commended for their participation. RMC Representative Kerry Prochaska reported that his firm works with other municipalities, and, due to the immense process of applying for ISTEA funding, other municipalities have elected not to pursue application, financing projects in-house. WATER DEPARTMENT WATER LINE PROJECT - REOUEST APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER Kerry Prochaska/RMC presented a change order for the Old Church Shops portion of this Project. The change order is necessitated due to: (1) a leak of existing (albeit unknown) unknown utilities ($1,000); and (2) installation of a new fire hydrant ($3,500), for a total of $4,500. Director Linnane advised that the original contract amount was $234,961; and the total change order total is now $15,600. The actual project budget is $250,000. Staff confirmed that, due to cancellation of the $30,000 Highway 7 Project, adequate funds are available to fund this project to completion. BRAD.OADPUBO.HINGCO ~' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS public Works Committee - June 22, 1995 - Page 4 The largest single portion of the Project is asphalt, and changes have occurred due to differing thickness levels. CDOT requires that new asphalt match existing levels and, RMC has determined that these levels vary between 2" - 6". Asphalt tonnage has doubled to approximately 17,000 tons. A discrepancy was found with this figure, and Director Linnane directed RMC to verify the asphalt depth and compare same with the tonnage tickets. The Committee recommends approval of the change order, with RMC and staff to verify asphalt tonnage and so advise the Committee. LOT 8. STANLEY HISTORIC DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT - OWNER REOUEST EASEMENT GRANT. The owner of Lot 9 is requesting an easement from the Town to cross Lot 8 to tap into an existing manhole. Lot 8 is an open space lot. Discussion followed concerning standard easement fees and Administrator Klaphake confirmed that the previous property owner deeded this lot to the Town at free of charge, and when the Town accepted the parcel, it was anticipated utility hookups would be requested. the Committee recommends approval of the request for an Easement Grant on Lot 8, contingent upon staff designating the easement on-site, with little or no disturbance to occur on Lot 8. FUEL TANK REHABILITATION AND SITE STUDY - REOUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES. RMC submitted a scope of services and cost of engineering services for the Town's fleet fueling system. The existing system is comprised of four tanks that are 19-21 years old, a pressure-type distribution system, dispensers and PIN control system. In general, every facet of the existing system must be modified by 1998 to comply with the EPA regulations. The purpose of the study is to determine the most feasible and economical alternative to comply with said regulations. Six alternatives were presented for a total cost of $7,280. A detailed cost estimate for each alternative will be prepared for the budget process. Staff confirmed that the Department currently stocks three types of fuel and when replacement is completed, only diesel and unleaded will be supplied. Study completion is anticipated by August 14, 1995. The committee recommends approval of the Scope of Services, not to exceed $7,280 submitted by RMC. MAIL BOX CLUSTER UNITS - REOUEST APPROVAL TO EXPEND BUDGETED FUNDS. The 1995 budget contains $23,000 for the construction and installation of NBU's. This is Phase III of this project, and it should provide neighborhood mail delivery to those citizens that reside along the Highway 34 corridor from Lone Pine Acres to the Fall River Valley. Manager Sievers reviewed potential unit locations (17) and reported thatÂ· neighborhood meetings were scheduled June 22. The Committee adhered to existing policy whereby there is one cluster box unit/subdivision, with a maximum of 48 units per location. There is no individual cost for this Program, and the units are being located on Town property, right- of-way or open space. The final phase (1996) will include the downtown area, south of Wonderview Ave. and W. Elkhorn Ave. Director Linnane donfirmed that new developments are apprised of the cluster box installation program and such are included in their plans. Staff requested authorization to immediately proceed with bidding and construction following public meetings scheduled June 22 with Town Board approval scheduled June 27th. The entire budget will be used to provide service to approximately 700 households or as many as possible without exceeding the budget. The Committee reiterated .BRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - June 22, 1995 - Page 5 that the Cluster Box Mail Delivery Program was mandatory for the entire Town; however, residents are being heard on where units are being located. The Committee recommends staff be authorized to expend the budgeted funds as further defined above. REPORTS. The Committee reviewed the Customer Service Response and Water Reports for May, which indicate that due to heavy rainfall, water sales are down 11%. The Committee complimented the extra efforts of the Water Dept. during the high flow of seasonal run-off. The Department was successful in preventing any Water quality problems. Director Linnane praised all entities offering assistance during the substantial run-off this season: Fire and Police Dept., all Public Works employees, and Robert Burkhardt/Eagle Rock School. Eagle Rock School provided 20 students who filled 1,200 sandbags in two hours. Mr. Burkhardt offered this very timely assistance. Village Pizza, Subway and McDonald's were also commended for donating food to work crews. Staff believes the high-water threat has ceased; however, the Dept. will closely monitor thunderstorms of extended periods of time. Staff reviewed the Highway 7, Highway 34, and Elkhorn Avenue Overlay Projects which will are scheduled for Summer, 1996. Highway 34 east to Loveland is currently be overlayed. As stated in prior Committee meetings, residents are urged to meet with the Public Works Dept. to review upcoming CDOT construction on Highways 7 and 34. There being no further business, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 9:44 A.M. 9/ 06,0 (0- 0244Â£.ci' Vickie O'Connor, CMC/AAE, Town Clerk â€¢ 8/ADFORDPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission June 20, 1995 Commission: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, John Gilfillan,- Alma Hix, Edward Pohl, and David Thomas Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners, Burgess, Gilfillan, Hix, Pohl, and Thomas Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Senior Planner Joseph, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: Commissioner Brown Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. 1. MINUTES. Minutes of the May 16, 1995 meeting were approved as submitted. 2. ANNEXATION. 2.A. Manske Addition -- Annexation and Zoning. Glen & Margaret Manske/Applicants. Chairman Sager reviewed the rules of participation for Public Hearings, and opened the Public Hearing. Director Stamey clarified that two separate items are being considered: annexation and establishment of zoning. Applicant's Representative Bill Van Horn stated the Applicant is proposing to annex this 1.54 acre site and is requesting R- M Multiple Family zoning for construction of twelve dwelling units. The property is currently zoned E-Estate, County. Director Stamey reported area zoning and uses as follows: North: R-M Residential Multiple Family, Single Family; South: E-Estate, County, Single Family; East: R-S Residential, Single Family; West: E-Estate, County, Single Family. The , 1978 Estes Park Comprehensive Plan recommended a future land use for this area of Residential, defined as 0.6 acres per dwelling unit. A petition opposing the proposed zoning had been submitted, containing 45 signatures of surrounding property owners. Senior Planner Joseph presented maps displaying the existing zoning and land use, resident locations in opposition to R-M zoning, and petitioners who reside within 100 ft. of the proposed Manske Addition. Chairman Sager noted that letters of opposition were received from James Mack, 1010 Acacia Dr.; Mary Coen, 1731 Avalon Dr.; Barb Ludwig, 1119 Brook Dr.; and William and Virginia Swim, 1660 Clover Ln. The following area residents spoke in opposition to the proposed R-M Zoning, noting drainage problems, environmental impacts, elk and deer migration, decreased property values, pollution, destruction of view corridors, increased traffic, loss of privacy, and public safety issues: Harold Allen, 1750 S. St. Vrain Ave.; Lynda Vogel, 1129 Brook Dr.; Jeannette Villers, 1720 Avalon Dr.; and Jeanie Tippin, 1641 Avalon Dr. In addition, Sally Badali, on behalf of her father, Frank Burke, 1041 Acacia Dr., stated that the surrounding property is established as single-family housing and the property owners should be assured the proposed Manske Addition would be the same. Mary Coen, 1731 Avalon Dr., previous owner of the property, understood a deed restriction could not be attached to the buildings or their placement on the property. Austin Condon, Margaret Clark, and Bryan Michener, representing EVIA, disagreed with the proposed zoning. There were no property owners, nor correspondence BRADFORD PUBLIS-+4'1~ Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission, June 20, 1995 - Page 2 received, in favor of the proposal. Property owners are, however, in favor of the annexation. Representative Van Horn stated that zoning for the area is being established, not modified, due to the annexation; when land is annexed, it is removed from a rural situation to urban status; the development will be planned to preserve mature trees; the development does not eliminate elk migration; and the proposed plan will not encroach on view corridors. Staff recommends annexation with R-S Resident'ial Single Family zoning, allowing the site to be subdivided into three single- family lots or two duplex lots. The property to be annexed will be included in the NortheFn Colorado Water Conservancy District or Sub-District. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Sager closed the Public Hearing. It was moved and seconded (Burgess-Hix) that the Manske Addition Annexation, with R-S Single Family zoning, be favorably ~ recommended to the Board Of Trustees, and it passed unanimously. Commissioner Burgess stated that her rationale for R-S Zoning included: response from the neighborhood and - the 1978 Comprehensive Plan. 3. SPECIAL REVIEW 3.a. Special Review 95-2. Manske Addition, Avalon Dr.. Glen & Margaret Manske/Applicants. Applicant' s Representative Bill Van Horn requested this item be continued. It was moved and seconded (Pohl-Gilfillan) that Special Review 95-2, Manske Addition, be continued to July 18, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 3.b. Special Review 95-3. Community Church of the Rockies, 1700 Brodie Dr.. Installation of Carillon Bells. Chairman Sager opened the Public Hearing. Polly G. Gunn, Elder of The Community Church of the Rockies, reported the Church is ' proposing to install carillon bells, which would be operated twice on Sunday mornings and on Christmas Eve, Maundy Thursday, and special requests. The speakers will face Fish Creek Rd. where there is no housing, and the sound level will be set and monitored. Only designated personnel will have access to the operation of the bells. Director Stamey stated that the bells are an acceptable use if operated as stated in the application. Favorable correspondence was received from EVRPD, W.B. Paynter, and D.A. Lienemann, Sr. Lou Wallace, 1141 Wallace Ln., spoke in favor of the proposal and noted the bells will play melodies. There being no further comments, Chairman Sager closed the Public Hearing. It was moved and seconded (Hix-Burgess) that Special Review 95-3, for the installation of carillon bells at the Community Church of the Rockies, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, and it passed unanimously. 4. SUBDIVISIONS. 4.a. Amended Plat, Lots 14 & 15, The Crags Subdivision, Sharon Nordic/Annlicant. Commissioner A. Hix declared a conflict of interest, stated she would not participate in discussion nor vote, and vacated the room. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's Representative, noted that the owner is proposing to replat a 5.88 acre site into six lots, 0.41 to 1.7 acres each, for single family development. Zoning is R-M Multiple Family and the land is presently vacant. It was noted the Preliminary Plat was presented at last month's meeting, and all requirements referring to that Plat will be applicable to . BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Pimmission, June 20, 1995 - Page 3 this Amended Plat. The Applicant has no objections to the staff recommendations which will be incorporated into the Final Plat. It was moved and seconded (Pohl-Thomas) the Amended Plat, Lots 14, 15, The Crags Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Burgess, Gilfillan, Pohl, Sager, and Thomas. Those voting "Noll None. Those "Abstaining" Commissioner A. Hix: 1. Provide verification of N.C.W.C.D. inclusion or application. 2. Modify Notes 3 and 4. 3. Construction plans be approved prior to Town Board approval. 4. Provide documentation for maintenance of Audubon Street. 5. Provide cluster box location and installation, pending approval by the Post Office. 6. Provide Improvement Guarantee, including completion of Phase I "punch list" items, submitted prior to Town Board approval. Commissioner A. Hix resumed her position on the Planning Commission. 4.b. Amended Plat. Lot 4. Subdivision of Lot 17, Block 10. Town of Estes Park, 210 & 212 Virginia Dr.. Nancy Marsden/ Applicant. Director Stamey stated that Town Attorney White advised, prior to final approval of the plat, it is necessary to obtain a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's Representative, concurred with Town Attorney White's opinion. It was moved and seconded (Thomas- Pohl) the Amended Plat, Lot 4 of Lot 17, Block 10, Town of Estes Park, be continued pending Board of Adjustment action, and it passed unanimously. 4.c. Final Plat. Grev Fox Estates, Second Filing. Richard & Ann Barlow/Applicant. Commissioner A. Hix declared a conflict of interest, stated she would not participate in discussion nor vote, and vacated the room. Chairman Sager expressed concern regarding the incomplete proposal, adding that the First Filing, previously approved, is also incomplete. Applicant's Representative Bill Van Horn stated that the owners agree with the staff comments and are proceeding with the installation of improvements instead Of using an Improvement Guarantee. The CDOT Access Permit is being negotiated. Representative Van Horn agreed that a delay in action is appropriate. It was moved and seconded (Thomas- Burgess) the Final Plat, Grey Fox Estates, Second Filing, be continued until July 18, 1995, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Burgess, Gilfillan, Pohl, Sager, and Thomas. Those voting "No" None. Those "Abstaining" Commissioner A. Hix. Commissioner A. Hix resumed her position on the Planning Commission. 4.d. Amended Plat, Lots 7, 8, 25 and a Portion of 24, Block 10, 2nd Amended Plat, Town of Estes Park, Lewiston Condominiums, Rex Miller/Applicant. Applicant Rex Miller reported the original development plan was submitted in 1978. The Applicant is proposing to complete the project by constructing Buildings D&F(a total of 7 units), noting that Building F has been downsized from 9 units to 3 units. An access easement is being negotiated with the Lewiston Condominium Association. Public Works Director Linnane reported a drainage plan was not originally submitted, and BRADFOROPUBLImMINGC. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Cammission, June 20, 1995 - Page 4 added that all drainage is presently being directed toward a house located on the southeast portion of the site. Additional structures may present a drainage problem at this site. There is adequate space in Lot 8A to accommodate drainage. Director Stamey reported this proposal consolidates portions of three lots into one lot (8A), places the existing Lewiston Condominiums on one lot (7A), and proposes a new lot (7B) for seven condominium units and added: 1. Lewiston Condominiums were developed under prior non- conforming density. Since Lot 7B is being created as a new lot, it should be sized to conform to the minimum lot area requirement for 7 units - 40,000 square feet (0.9 Acres). 2. The proposed northern lot line between 7A and 7B bisects an existing garage resulting in nonconforming setbacks for this building. 3. Plat Information. 0 Proposed buildings (Building D) should be removed from the plat. Drainage easements to be added to the Plat. 0 The building envelop@ on Lot 78 does not match the apparent building area. * A note should be placed on the plat indicating which lots are served by the access easement (all lots will need to use it). A copy of the maintenance agreement for the access easement needs to be provided and a note added to the Plat. â€¢ Prospect Drive should be labeled as Spruce Drive Add vested rights statement. Indicate adjoining subdivision information to the west. Storm water detention should be provided during construction of all future buildings and added to the Plat. Indicate existing electric facilities on the Plat. Plans for sewer service be .indicated on the Plat, including upgraded sewer lines and deeded to the Estes Park Sanitation District. 4. Easements. 0 A 10-ft. wide utility easement should be provided along all lot lines. Utility easements need to be provided for all existing utilities. * Drainage easements need to be provided. 5. A water main extension to Lot 8A will be required and a utility easement dedicated at the Development Plan stage. A recess was called at 11:32 a.m. Chairman Sager reconvened the meeting at 11:40 a.m. Mr. Van Horn proposed that instead of increasing the size of Lot 7B, they would place a note on the Plat stating that the combined density for Lots 7B and 8A would conform with current requirements. Following review of Town Board minutes, Director Stamey noted there was no reference to approval of the development in 1978, as stated by the Applicant. Recognizing this Amended Plat will clarify the property lines and correct non-conforming conditions, and pursuant to the topography of the lot, the density transfer is appropriate. . .BRADFORIPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning CommiÂ»;lon,. June 20, 1995 - Page 5 - It was moved and seconded (Hix-Burgess) the Amended Plat of a Portion of Lots 7, 8, 25, and a Portion of Lot 24, Block 10, 2nd Amended Plat of the Town of Estes Park be favorably ~ recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note regarding the density for Lots 78 and BA be added to the Plat. 2. Non-conforming structure note be placed on the Plat. 3. Add plat information. 4. Provide utility easements along all lot lines, and provide easements for existing utilities, drainage, and water main extension. 5. Lot 78 and 8A share a common drainage facility. 6. Storm water detention be provided for all future ' construction. 7. Detention pond be located on Lot BA. 8. Storm drainage details for Lots 78 be provided with building permit application. The Planning Commission also noted that review of the Subdivision Plat did not grant any approval or standing for the old Lewiston Site Plan. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 5.a. Amendment to Development Plan 94-2, Lot 2A. Amended Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 4, First Addition, Lone Pine Acres, Lester Schmidt/Applicant. Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar stated the Applicant is requesting an Amendment to the original Development Plan approved in 1994. The original Plan included a fenced storage and parking area on the north side of the building with an extension of the fencing from the northwest property corner along the west property line to a gate attached to the northwest corner of the building. The fence and gate have not been constructed in this location. Instead, this area is being used for access to the storage yard and the rear of the building. A paved driveway and gate have been constructed to access the storage area on the east side of the building. Senior Planner Joseph reported the plan originally included a solid fence and landscaping on the east side of the site which was more responsive to neighborhood concerns regarding the appearance of the development and the storage area. The addition of this access on the east side has increased impervious coverage. Access to the storage area on the west side of the building has been constructed in a manner which permits direct passage between the parking lots across the west property line. Construction of the fence along the west property line and the gate at the northwest corner of the building, as originally proposed, may present an obstacle to this shared access. Both properties are owned by the Applicant. Ralph Nicholas, 1616 N. Ridge Ln., reported the gate on the east side is never closed and the driveway contains a dumpster and vehicles visible from his property; he requested the original Development Plan be observed. Chairman Sager requested suggestions regarding additional landscaping to screen the gate and driveway. Representative Kochevar offered suggestions; adding that an automatic closer for the gate has been ordered. Commissioner Thomas clarified that a paved driveway and gate were installed in defiance of the original Development Plan. Representative Kochevar stated that the Applicant was advised in April that although his actions were not approved by the Planning Commission, the Applicant did meet zoning ordinance requirements and that the Planning Commission would have no jurisdiction over these changes. Commissioner Pohl requested the Town Attorney give Imml PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission, June 20, 1995 - Page 6 an opinion on this statement. Commissioner Gilfillan questioned the function of the Planning Commission when asked to compromise an approved Development Plan. It was moved and seconded (Pohl-Burgess) the request for additional access to the storage yard on the east side be denied and the fenced enclosure and landscaped area be constructed as originally proposed for this area, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Burgess, Gilfillan, A. Hix, Pohl, and Thomas. Those voting "No" Chairman Sager. The Applicant was advised he may appeal this decision to the Board Of Trustees. Chairman Sager questioned the Planning Commission decision to require Applicant to comply with the ' original Development Plan when additional landscaping would provide proper screening of driveway and gate. Commissioner Burgess was excused from the meeting. 5.b. Development Plan 95-7. Portion of Lot 1. Mountain Man Subdivision. 358 E. Elkhorn Ave.. Colorado Wilderness Snorts/ Applicant. Commissioner A. Hix declared a conflict of - interest, stated she would not participate in discussion nor vote, and vacated the room. Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar reported the Applicant is proposing demolition of the existing 1,283 sq. ft. Colorado Wilderness Sports building and construction of a new 4,808 sq. ft. building. Elevation drawings were presented confirming the front of the building as one story for the retail business and the rear of the building as two story to accommodate a climbing wall. A ladder will be in place from the roof of the front portion of the building to the roof of the rear portion of the building, but will be camouflaged and inconspicuous from the street. The position of the proposed 'west wall will be on the west property line which will eliminate the existing parking on the property. The sidewalk will extend from the Riverwalk to the building and landscaping will coordinate with the Riverwalk. Drainage details will be submitted to the Public Works Director for appioval. The rear entrance design has not been finalized. The building will be expanded to the south over the existing buried telephone service line. A new empty telephone conduit is available to serve this property and is located in the Riverwalk easement allowing abandonment of the existing buried telephone line. Director Stamey reported there is no parking requirement in the C-D district and noted the existing streetscape improvements on the north side of the building are to remain, and the Riverwalk improvements on the south side must be modified to provide access to a new public entrance and dumpster enclosure. This property is a condominium ownership. Director Stamey read correspondence submitted by Art Anderson, EPURA Executive Director, regarding the impact on the Riverwalk area. Michelle Hurni expressed the following concerns: visual impact on the Riverwalk, site elevation plans were unavailable prior to the meeting, and the decreased parking when the development will produce the need for additional parking. Chairman Sager urged Ms. Hurni to state her concerns regarding parking to the Town Board. It was moved and seconded (Thomas-Pohl) Development Plan 95-7, Colorado Wilderness Sports, 358 E. Elkhorn Ave. be approved continent upon the following, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Gilfillan, Pohl, Sager, and Thomas. Those voting " Nol' None. Those "Abstaining" Commissioner A. Hix: 1. Additions to the plan: Identify the project as condominium units. Indicate finish floor elevation of the building. * Indicate the existing public streetscape easement ' on the north side. . aRADFOROPUBLISHINGCOÂ· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission,.June 20, 1995 - Page_'F- ./ â€¢ Indicate treatment of area between the Riverwalk easement and south building wall. I Accurately identify the public walkway along the . river relative to the building and the existing easement boundary. 2. The Riverwalk entrance shall be: 8 ft. wide. â€¢ Planned to avoid tree removal within the public easement, and area restored to original condition. * Limited to one walkway connection to the Riverwalk for both dumpster access and building entry. Coordinate with the Town of Estes Park Parks Department. 3. Drainage be designed to avoid concentrated discharge across public walkways. 4. Streetscape planters on the north side of the building be protected. 5. Sanitary sewer and existing services be maintained. 6. Relocation of gas meters be carefully planhed to avoid . visual impacts and conflicts with other utilities or public walkways. Commissioner A. Hix resumed her position on the Planning Commission. 5.c. Amendment to Development Plan 94-9, Mountain Golf Villas, Martin Exploration/Applicant. Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar reported the Applicant is requesting a revision to the original development plan. One unit will be converted from two-story to one-story ranch style and ten units will be converted to ranch-style duplex units with a reduction to one garage space per unit and additional parking on the drive apron. Four units will be handicapped accessible. No additional units are being proposed, and there will be no change in the perimeter landscaping. A revised drainage plan will be submitted. Director Stamey stated the project is in conformance with the original density calculation, with slightly larger building footprints and shared driveways. This reconfiguration should not alter the conditions of the original apprgval. It was moved and seconded (Gilfillan-Hix) the Amended Development Plan, Mountain Golf Villas, be approved, contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. All conditions of original approval shall apply to the reconfigured plan. 2. Grading plan and detention pond be revised, pursuant to comments of the Â·Public Works Department. 3. Driveway locations be added to the plan for Units 6, 12, and 18. 4. Designations of handicapped accessible units be so indicated on the plan. There being no further business, Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 12:48 p.m. - Ca. 1<Utf Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk Â·Â· .21Â· I k. ...gÂ·,t ~ * ' 1 I ...:... Ogice 4 the 1lagor Eates Nark, Â¢olorabo 301*74 tlw? WHEREAS, BYRON "BARNEY" GRAVES served the citizens of Estes Park for many years, serving as Trustee of the Town of Estes Park from 1978 to 1986; and WHEREAS, during his tenure, BYRON "BARNEY" GRAVES" played a significant role in the following community service: Board of Trustees Board of Appeals Administrative Committee Member Advertising & Public Relations Committee Member Code & Sanitation Committee Member Light & Power Committee, Chairman Public Safety Conunittee, Chairman Planning Commissioner Firemen's Pension Board, Treasurer Policemen's Pension Board, Treasurer Implementation of EPURA Estes Park Human Resources Board Estes Park Volunteer Fire Department Estes Park Public Library Estes Park area Historical Museum Estes Park Sanitation District Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Recreation District Board. Mr. Graves served the community with dedication and distinction. On behalf of the Town of Estes Park, it is an honor to bestow this Resolution of Respect to the Family of Byron "Barney" Graves as a tribute to his service and leadership. 10 Wltntli WQI,O~ 9 Aal'E AE~EUnte sÂ£t m:j Aand and eau 12 d #t .a[ 4 'Al, Cit, to 61 afAXEd. allayot 93,1/, A ..AN,le.....6 4&*fil': . Â¢~; ,#.AL.~ TOWN OF ESTES PARK Gary F. Klaphake - Town Administrator ---2*11\~ Al 9 .'691 '*de .Â»CIC[; 2 fv..Â· 74$ A " --tiv/fUL -Â· 44{ - ' ~~Â£_ ~~ 2 3.--~ .. ,r~hla,I j.â€ž ~0-92 41 Â»Â« /3.3 \ Estes Park, Colorado 80517 MEMORANDUM July 11, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor Dannels Board of Trustees FROM: Gary Klaphake ~f. V-' Town Administrator RE: U.S. WEST/FALL RIVER ROAD I have added this to the Town Board agenda as item 1.5 of Action items. The businesses of Fall River Road are asking our support to amend U.S. West's construction plans. We do not have the jurisdiction to say yes or no. Rather we can make recommendations that will carry a lot of weight. The folks on Fall River Road realize that this could delav phone upgrades in their area. U.S. West had previously been asked to attend the Thursday Light & Power Committee meeting. We will continue with this effort to keep communication about upgrades on-going. Recommendation: The Town Board move to support Fall River business owners' complaint to U.S. West and the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. CC: Richard Matzke, Light & Power Director Bill Linnane, Public Works Director P. O. Box 1200 Telephone (303) 586-5331 1 d COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION - Formal Complaint Form BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. COMPLAINT Michael T. Wallace dba Blackhawk Lodges Ltd. 1 et. al. (Listing Attached) COMPLAINANTS V. U.S. West Communications 2 RESPONDENT COMPLAINT Complainants state: 1. That the Complainants are: 3 (LISTING ATTACHED) 2. That the name and business address of each Respondent is: 4 U.S. West Communications 3. That the Complainants will cooperate in the prosecution of this Complaint and will appear at any hearing if the complaint is set for hearing. 1 1 . COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION - Formal Complaint Form 5 4. That the specific acts or things complained of, with the necessary facts to give a full understanding of the situation, are: (a). The Complainants believe that U.S. West Communications will cause them financial harm due to guests leaving early or cancelling reservations if U.S. West Communications should again begin and continue their construction on Fall River Road (Highway 34 west) during the months of July, August, September and October, 1995. This is our busiest time of the business year and revenues during this period can account for up to 75-90% of a property's yearly revenue. (b). The noise level and disruption to business from the laying of the new telephone line at this time of the year will cause such great loss of income that some of us could be put in extreme financial difficulty; even to the point of potential bankruptcy in some instances. (c). If we were to lose only 25% of our business during this time period, it would amount to approximately $7,260.00 per day. Calculated to a minimum of 106 days (July 1- October 15, 1995) the total amount of potential loss could be up to $769,560.00. We feel this is a conservative estimate and that the percentage of vacancy, if it reached 75%, would amount to $2,224,728.00. If the delay in construction were to take longer than 106 days, the amount of loss could mount to an additional several millions of dollars. (d). Fall River Road (Highway 34 west) is the north entrance to Rocky Mountain National Park and we are greatly concerned that traffic during the construction months cited would be severly restricted, delayed and backed up as it was in the spring of this year. Such circumstances on this road which is winding and narrow in places would not only further contribute to loss of guest bookings, but add the potential for accidents during this, our busiest and major tourist time of the year. 2 - COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION - Formal Complaint Form - 6 WHEREFORE, Complainants ask that the Commission enter an Order granting the following relief: 1. We ask that U.S. West Communications not begin construction until November 1, 1995 so that we may complete our short business season without incurring the potential economic loss and related problems previously cited. 2. We ask the Commission to grant U.S. West Communications an extension, if necessary and needed, on their mandate to be finished with their .. construction by December 31, 1995. 3. We request that U.S. West be allowed to use explosives as necessary to break rock sections during construction instead of hammering and drilling. This would assist in more rapid completion of the construction project and limit noise. 4. We hereby ask for an expedited hearing date. City or town where you would like to have your hearing: ESTES PARK, COLORADO List of unavailable hearing dates for the next 180 days: NONE 7 Dated at Estes Park, Colorado, this day of ,1995. 3 J COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES - Formal Complaint Form 8 Signatures: 4 COMPLAINANTS M.T. Wallace, dba Blackhawk Lodges Ltd, 1750 Fall River Road John & Sandra Gilfillan, dba The Woodlands, 1888 Fall River Road Robert & Kathleen Mussman, Sunnyside Knoll, 1675 Fall River Road Nick Kane, Nicky's Resort, 1350 Fall River Road (US 34 West) Michael Dubber, Fawn Valley Inn & Chalets, 2760 Fall River Road LaNelle Clements, Amberwood, 1889 Fall River Road James W. Tawney, Ponderosa Lodge, 1820 Fall River Road Al Work, Workshire Lodge, 2690 Fall River Road Marjorie Oliver, Timber Creek Chalets, 2115 Fall River Road Dave Hamilton, Pine Haven Cottages, 1580 Fall River Road Alex Emms, Inn on Fall River, 1660 Fall River Road Jeff Barker, dba Trails West, 1710 Fall River Road Ruth Clinton, Castle Mountain Lodge, 1520 Fall River Road Ruth Clinton, McGregor Mountain Lodge, 2815 Fall River Road Grant A. Keller, Fall River Trading Post, 1875 Fall River Road Tony Sale, Boulder Brook, 1900 Fall River Road -wk- P.U.ING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS , Public Works Committee - June 22. 1995 - Page 2 /~~0 PARK ENTRANCE ESTATES SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - FORMATION. In a letter dated June 13, 1995, Town AttornAy White reported on a meeting held with Park Entrance Estates property owners on May 31 for the purpose of outlining the procedural steps for the formation of the Special Improvement District for special improvement district bonds, and an election on November 7, 1995. A time schedule is as follows: At their meeting July 11, the Town Board would adopt a preliminary order adopting preliminary plans and specifications for the project. The order would include the cost of improvements, together with a map of the District and a schedule indicating the approximate amounts to be assessed Â· upon the lots within the District. At their meeting August 8, the Town Board would adopt an Ordinance authorizing the improvements to be made. The Board would also direct staff to begin the process of placing the bond issue on the November 7, 1995 election ballot. At their meeting September 12, 1995, the Board would authorize the form of the ballot question for the bond issue, adopt any necessary resolutions or ordinances to place the question on the ballot, and determine exactly who would be eligible to vote. (If private placement of the bonds is successful, only those electors within the District would vote. If the bonds are placed in the public market, a Town-wide election would result.) Staff is recommending the Board adopt a resolution indicating that only registered electors who are owners of property within or residents of the proposed District would be eligible to vote on said question. In addition, the original petition did not contemplate water system improvements in Block 1. If the homeowners desire to have the water system improvements in Block 1 included as part of the improvements, a petition signed by 50% of the properties to be assessed for the water system improvements must be filed with the Town on or before July 7, 1995. Attorney White advised that the schedule must be followed if the Town is to meet election guidelines. public Works Director Linnane reviewed the project and explained that cost estimates have been calculated on the "high end" to ensure sufficient funds are collected; otherwise, should the bids exceed bond fundihg, the entire election process must again be initiated. The property owners should assume they will incur high- end costs. Concerning roadways, it is difficult for an existing subdivision to comply with Town standards, and staff has determined that said standards could be relaxed to: 20' roadways, 134% slopes, and 70' radius curves. Various maps of Park Entrance Estates were displayed which detail staff's plans for the roadways, which include culverts, competent drainage, and asphalt. These improvements will necessitate any utilities in existing roadways to be relocated. Cost estimates for improvements were based upon similar projects, and they are estimated using a 10-year loan with 6-3/4% interest- Attorney White confirmed that the 10-year period is standard. In addition, it must be established that the improvements will increase the value of the property. For comparison purposes, staff prepared the cost estimates providing low and high ranges; however, listed below is staff's summary: HECUHD Or PMUCEEDINGS 9...FOR' PUILI"ING COÂ· . . Public Works Committee - June 22. 1995 - Page 3 Roadwav Cost Ranae. Blocks Land 2 flow to hiah cost ranges ) $225,000 - $360,000 $7,500/lot - $10,600/lot $1,050/yr. to $1,500/yr. Block 2 Water Cost Range (1Qwto-hi_gostranges $65,000 - $90,000 $6,000/lot - ,$8,200/lot $900/yr. - $1,150/yr, Block 1 Water flow to hiah cgst ranges 1 $180,000 - $275,000 $9,500/lot - $14,500/lot $1,350/yr. - $2,000/yr. The above costs per lot were based upon on less lots than actual. To be safe, the costs per lot will remain the same and the total costs will increase. Also, the above cost ranges do not include tap fees of $4,0001/lot. Director Linnane reported that consultants were furnished the design prepared by property owner Ralph Hopper for water improvements for Block 2. If a property has an existing water tap, they will not be required to purchase another. Staff explained that costs are higher to provide water in Block 1 due to the distance to existing water connection points. Administrator Klaphake commented that a contingency must be included; assessments are based upoij "actual costs"; and the low- rans 3 costs may be unrealistic. Regarding Block 1 water improvements, Park Entrance representatives noted that unofficially, it does not appear that these specific improvements will be included in the project. Attorney White clarified that in order to vote on this ballot question, a person must be a Colorado registered elector. Then, the person must own real property within the District at which the person resides, or a renter, if registered to vote, of property within the District. Concluding all discussion, the Committee recommends (1) staff proceed with preparation of a packet for the July 11 Town Board meeting, and (2) Town Administrator Klaphake be authorized to contact financial institutions to explore the market. 11 JUL-07-1995 10:55 HAMMOND, CLARK & WHITE 3036699380 P.02 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, certain property owners in a subdivision of the Town of Estes Park. Colorado (the "Townn) known as Park Entrance Estates have petitioned the Town's Board of Trustees (the "Bo=d" ) for the acqnkition Mid cousinÂ£tion of certain local water distribution system and roadway improvements; and WHEREAS, the statutory procedures for creating special impnovement districts within m,micipalitics are ser forth in Title 31, Article 25, Pan 5, CAS ; and WHEREAS, pursurant to Section 31-25-502, Colorado Revised Stanttes ("C.R.S".1 it is lawful for the Town to construct local improvements oftbe type requested and assess the costs thereof upon the property especially benefitted by such improvements within the boundaries of a special improvement district; and WHEREAS, the local water distribution system improvements include but are not limited to the improvement of the water distribution system within Block 2 of the Park Entrance Estates Subdivision, including the removal of the current wer distribution system and the installation of anew water distribution system. and WHEREAS, the local roadway improvements proposed include but am not limited to the improvement ofall public streets within the Park Emrance Estates subdivision except Sunrise Lane Rom its inmrsection with M-inw Circle. inclâ„¢ling widâ€¢ning, paving anel installation of appropriate drainage facilities; and WHEREAS, the Town has nceived petitions for such local water distnbution system and roadway improvements subscribed by the owners of,Uperty to be assesscd fur more than Ozle-half of the entire costs estimated by the Board to be assessed in a cach of two assessment units; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest ofthe Town and its inhabitants to cream a Special impmviment disttict within the subdivision known as Park Entrance Estaces and to acquire and construct local water disaibution system and Ioadway improvements whhin such Special improvement district amd assess the costs ofsuch improvemems to the properties within the specialimprovement district especially bcnelitted by the improvernents; and WHRREAS. putsuant to Section 31-25-503(3).C.R.S., in order to begin the process of creating a special improvement district for this purpose, the Board is required to adopt a preliminary order setting forth various particulars of the improvements and the comtruction project; und WHEREAS, it also is necessary for the Board to call a public hearing on these matters and to direct thc Town Clerk to give notice of such haaring; NOW TIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. De Board hereby declares its intent to create a special improvement distria to bc Imown as the Town of Estes Park, Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District No. 95-1 (the "Distria"1 pr.suant to the petitions submitted to the Board, subscribed with the signantres of owners of property within the District expected to be assessed for more than o=-halfof the costs of the improvements to be made in each of two assessment units therein. Section 2. The Bod hemby adop# the prelizninary plans and speciScations piesented at the regular meeting of the Board at which this Resolution is adopted and hereby further adopts and makes a preliminary order as follows: a) the matenals to be used in the roadway improvements shall bo primarily asphalt and such other niaterials as are eustomary and appropriate to ttic type of inwrovements being acquired and constructed; and b)thc matcrials to be used in the water distribution system ia,provements shall bcprirnarily steel and PVC plastic and such other materials as arc customary and appropriate to the type of improvements being acquired and cons=ted; and c) the assessments to be imposed upon the propetty within the special improvement district shall be payable in 10 annual installments over a period of 10 years; and c) the legal desaiption of the property to bc included in the special implovement district is: Paik Entrance Estates Addition to the Town of Estes Pagic, Larimer Colmty, Colorado; and d) the Town ensineer shall make a good faithe,timate ofthe total costs of the improvements to be acquimd and constructed andshall prepare ur causcto be preparcd amapof the special district and a *hedule of the approximate amounts to bc assessed upon the several lots or patcels of property within the special improvement district Section 3. The Board hereby callsapublic hearing on the proposed creation of the Town of Estes Patic, Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement Distric No. 1 and schedules such public hearing for Tuesday, August 8, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. Section 4. The Board hereby directs the Town CleR to prepare a Notice of Public Hearing Substantially in the form attached hereto as ExhibitA and made apart he=ofby this =ference. The Town Clak shall cause the Notice to be publishcd in the Esfes Park *ail-42:ene in an edition published not later than Friday, July 14, 1995, and shall cause the Notice to be mailed by first class maiI to each property owner to be assessed for the costs of the improvements within the District The Notice shall be mailed on or about the date on which the Notice is published Section 5. The Board hereby fin<Is and detemines that the petitions of property owners were presented inaccordangc with law and that they -re signed by owners ofpropcity to be assessed for mom than one-half of the total costs of the improvements to be assessed in each of the assessment limits. JUL-07-1553 12Â· Do nni u â€¢wi.w i k.r,i ~i ~ wl * â€¢ â€¢ â€¢ 4.- Section 6. Pursuant to Section 32-25-503(6), CAS, this Resolution and the preliminary order contained herein may be modified, contirmed, or rescinded at any time prior to the passage of the ordinance creating the District and authouing the acq~sition and construction ofthe improvements. THIS RESOLUIION was pes=d and adopted =i became effective on this tlth day of July, 1995. (SEAL) TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO Attest Mayor Town Clerk JUL-07-1995 10:56 HAMMOND, CLARK & WHITE 3036699380 P.05 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE CREATION OF A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS TOWN OF ESTES PARK PARK ENTRANCE ESTATES SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTNO. 95-1 The Town of Estes Park, Colorado (the "Town") has duly called and hereby gives notice of a public hwaring to be held on Tuesday, August 8. 1995. al 7:30 pm. althc Town Hall, located at 170 MacGregor Avenue, in Estcs Park, Colorado. The Town Board of Trustees (the "Board") has mceived petitions requesting the acquisition and construction of certain local water distribution syutcm and roadway improvements within a subdivision of the Town known ag Park Enuance Estates. The petitioners have requested that a special improvement district be formed within which such improvements would be acquired and constructed by the Town and that the costs of such improvements be assessed upon the property within the district receiving special benefit from the improvements. Thâ€¢ petitions are subscribed with the signatures of owners of more than one-half ofthe propc:ty to bc assesied in each of two assessment units within such propesed special improvement district. Interested persons st:ould note thc following information: 1. The local improvemenb requested include but are not limited to: a) local water distribution system impmvements including the improvement ofthe water distribution system within Block 2 oftbe Park Entrance Estates subdivision, including the removal of the current system and the installation of a new water distribution systcm and b) the improvement of all public streets within the Park Entrance Estaies subdivision except Sunrise Lane Bom its intciscgtion with Meadow Circle, including widening, paving, and installation of appropriate dminago fwilities. 2. The proposed assessments would bo payable over ten ycars in ten annual installments. 3. 'Ibe probable cost to be assessed per lot for the roadway improvements is $ 10,600 and the probable cost to be assessed per lot for the Water distribution system improvements is an additional $8200. In the judgmem ofthe Boaid the use of a per-lot assessment basis reflects the benelits which acÂ©rue to the propetty bobeassessed. as shown by engineering estimates. 4. An ordinance creating the special improwment district and authorizing the local water diskibution system and roadway improvements therein will be considered by the Board at its regular meeting on Tuesday, August 4 1995, following the public hearing which is the subject of this notice. Such date is not less than twenty (20) days afber the publication of this notice. 5. A mip of the proposed dimict and a schedule showing the approximate amounts to be assessed UpOI1 the severallots and parcels within the proposed spectal improvemcnt district am on file now in the oflice oftho Town Clerk located in the Town Hall and am available to be scen and examined by any interested person from now through the date ofthe hearing. All complaints and obj.ctions made in writing concerning :he proposed improvements by the owner orowners ofiny propaty to bc assessed will be heard and detennined by the Board before ligal action i. taken. aL=YickidID,nnor _ - Town Clerk Publish in: Esms-Park Trailgia=tk Publish on or before: Julx~14.1991 JUL-U { 4.-,- -, 1 , .r-" 1. 1~/ .... CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certily that on this _ day of 1995, a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was deposited in the United-Statcs mail. postage prepaid, addressed to the following: - - I 090.91 TOTAL P.06 ~MAOFORD PU'umMING co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' . Public Works Committee - June 22, 1995 - Page 4 FUEL TANK REHABILITATION AND SITE STUDY - REQUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE 3.6. OF SERVICES. RMC submitted a scope of services and cost of engineering services 51 for the Town' s fleet fueling system. The existing system is comprised of four tanks that are 19-21 years old, a pressure-type distribution system, dispensers and PIN control system. In general, every facet of the existing system must be modified by 1998 to comply with the EPA regulations. The purpose of the study is to determine the most feasible and economical alternative to comply with said regulations. Six alternatives were presented for a total cost of $7,280. A detailed cost estimate for each alternative will be prepared for the budget process. Staff confirmed that the Department currently stocks three types of fuel and when replacement is completed, only diesel and unleaded will be supplied. Study completion is anticipated by August 14, 1995. The committee recommends approval of the scope of Services, not to exceed $7,280 submitted by RMC. MAIL BOX CLUSTER UNITS - REOUEST APPROVAL TO EXPEND BUDGETED FUNDS. The 1995 budget contains $23,000 for the construction and v D E,D installation of NBU's. This is Phase III of this project, and it should provide neighborhood mail delivery to those citizens that reside along the Highway 34 corridor from Lone Pine Acres to the Fall River Valley. Manager Sievers reviewed potential unit locations (17) and reported thatÂ· neighborhood meetings were scheduled June 22. The Committee adhered to existing policy whereby there is one cluster box unit/subdivision, with a maximum of 48 units per location. There is no individual cost for this program, and the units are being located on Town property, right- of-way or open space. The final phase (1996) will include the downtown area, south of Wonderview Ave. and W. Elkhorn Ave. Director Linnane confirmed that new developments are apprised of the cluster box installation program and such are included in their plans. Staff requested authorization to immediately proceed with bidding and construction following public meetings scheduled June 22 with Town Board approval scheduled June 27th. The entire budget will be used to provide service to approximately 700 households or as many as possible without exceeding the budget. The Committee reiterated that the Cluster Box Mail Delivery Program was mandatory for the entire Town; however, residents are being heard on where units are being located. The Committee recommends staff be authorized to expend the budgeted funds as further defined above. 0.0.u.Lt."INGCO , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission, June 20. 1995 - Page 2 ~ A ,.0: Special Review 95-3. Community Church of the Rockies, 0 " ' 1700 Brodie Dr.. Installation of Carillon Bella. Chairman Sager opened the Public Hearing. Polly G. Gunn, Elder of The Community . Church of the Rockies, reported the Church is proposing to install carillon bells, which would be operated twice on Sunday mornings and on christmas Eve, Maundy Thursday, and special requests. The speakers will face Fish Creek Rd. where there is no housing, and the sound level will be set and monitored. Only designated personnel will have access to the operation of the bells. Director Stamey stated that the bells are an acceptable use if operated as stated in the application. Favorable correspondence was received from EVRPD, W.B. Paynter, and D.A. Lienemann, Sr. Lou Wallace, 1141 Wallace Ln., spoke in favor of the proposal and noted the bells will play melodies. There being no further comments, Chairman Sager closed the Public Hearing. It was moved and seconded (Hix-Burgess) that Special Review 95-3, for the installation of carillon bells at the Community Church of the Rockies, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, and it passed unanimously. SUBDIVISIONS. ,/ . 3=*e__Amended Plat. Lots_14 & 15. The _Cracrs Subdivision, 71 0, Sharon Nordic/Applicant. Commissioner A. Hix declared a conflict of interest, stated she would not participate in discussion nor vote, and vacated the room. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's Representative, noted that the owner is proposing to replat a 5.88 acre site into six lots, 0.41 to 1.7 acres each, for single family development. Zoning is R-M Multiple Family and the land is presently vacant. It was noted the Preliminary Plat was presented at last month's meeting, and all requirements referring to that plat will be applicable to this Amended Plat. The Applicant has no objections to the staff recommendations which will be incorporated into the Final Plat. It was moved and seconded (Pohl-Thomas) the Amended Plat, Lots 14, 15, The Crags Subdivision be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Burgess, Gilfillan, Pohl, Sager, and Thomas. Those voting "Noll None. Those "Abstaining" Commissioner A. Hix: 1. Provide verification of N.C.W.C.D. inclusion or application. 2. Modify Notes 3 and 4. 3. Construction plans be approved prior to Town Board approval. 4. Provide documentation for maintenance of Audubon Street. 5. Provide cluster box location and installation, pending approval by the Post Office. 6. Provide Improvement Guarantee, including completion of . Phase I "punch list" items, submitted prior to Town Board approval. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS . ....Folopul'Iâ€¢MING COÂ· Planning immission. June 20. 1995 - Page,~/ 4.e. ~-6.Â· Amended Plat. Lots 7. 8. 25 and a portion of 24. Block , 10, 2nd Amended Plat. Town_of_Entes-Park. Lewiston Condominiums. Rex Miller/Aoplicant. Applicant Rex Miller reported the original development plan was submitted in 1978. The Applicant is proposing to complete the project by constructing Buildings D&F(a total of 7 units), noting that Building F has been downsized from 9 units to 3 units. An access easement is being negotiated with the Lewiston Condominium Association. Public Works Director Linnane renorted a drainage plan was not originally submitted, and added that all drainage is presently being directed toward a house located on the southeast portion of the site. Additional structures may present a drainage problem at this site. There is adequate space in Lot 8A to accommodate drainage. Director Stamey reported this proposal consolidates portions of three lots into one lot (8A), places the existing Lewiston Condominiums on one lot (7A), and proposes a new lot (7B) for seven condominium units and added: 1. Lewiston Condominiums were developed under prior non- conforming density. Since Lot 7B is being created as a new lot, it should be sized to conform to the minimum lot Â· area requirement for 7 units - 40,000 square feet (0.9 Acres). 2. The proposed northern lot line between 7A and 78 bisects an existing garage resulting in nonconforming setbacks for this building. 3. Plat Information. I Proposed buildings (Building D) should be removed from the plat. Drainage easements to be added to the Plat. The building envelop'e on Lot 78 does not match the apparent building area. A note should be placed on the plat indicating which lots are served by the access easement (all lots will need to use it), A copy of the maintenance agreement for the access easement needs to bi provided and a note added to the Plat. Prospect Drive should be labeled as Spruce Drive Add vested rights statement. Indicate adjoining subdivision information to the west. Storm water detention should be provided during construction of all future buildings and added to the Plat. Indicate existing electric facilities on the Plat. 0 Plans for sewer service be indicated on the Plat, including upgraded sewer lines and deeded to the Estes Park Sanitation District. 4. Easements. A 10-ft. wide utility easement should be provided along all lot lines. * Utility easements need to be provided for all existing utilities. Drainage easements need to be provided. 5. A water main extension to Lot BA will be required and a utility easement dedicated Â·at the Development Plan stage. A recess was called at 11:32 a.m. Chairman Sager reconvened the meeting at 11:40 a.m. &'.0/0.0 PUIL'll'.0 CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission. June 20. 1995 + Page -5~ , Mr. Van Horn proposed that instead of increasing the size of Lot 7B, they would place a note on the plat stating that the combined density for Lots 78 and 8A would conform with current requirements. Following review of Town Board minutes. Director Stamey noted there was no reference to approval of the development in 1978, as stated by the Applicant. Recognizing this Amended Plat will clarity the property lines and correct non-conforming conditions, and pursuant to the topography of the lot, the density transfer is appropriate. It was moved and seconded (Hix-Burgess) the Amended Plat of a Portion of Lots 7, 8, 25, and a Portion of Lot 24. Block 10, 2nd Amended Plat of the Town of Estes Park be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note regarding the density for Lots 7B and 8A be added to the Plat. 2. Non-conforming structure note be placed on the Plat. 3. Add plat information. 4. Provide utility easements along all lot lines, and provide easements for existing utilities, drainage, and water main extension. 5. Lot 7B and 8A share a common drainage facilityÂ· 6. Storm water detention be provided for all future construction. 7. Detention pond be located on Lot 8A. 8. Storm drainage details for Lots 7B be provided with building permit application. The Planning Commission also noted that review of the Subdivision Plat did not grant any approval or standing for the old Lewiston Site Plan. ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC=1111=1111- lili-lili Post Office Box 3047 â€¢ Estes Park, CO 80517 Â· Telephone 970-586-5175 RECEIVED JUN 2 3 1995 June 22, 1995 W.O.2529A ADMIN. DEPT. Ms. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park P.O. 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Re: Lester Schmidt Development Plan Lot 2A, Block 4, First Addition to Lone Pine Acres Dear Ms. O'Connor: As the Planning Commission denied Lester Schmidt's request to modify his deve' #t plan, we respectfully request that the Town Board review this decision at itÂ¢<8 meeting. It is our belief that the modification meets the requirements of the Municip in every respect, without exception. In addition, we would appreciate a copy of the recording of the planning commission meeting as the transcript tends to be very abbreviated and not totally reflective of the entire meeting. This request is made in accordance with Municipal Code title 17.36.010 at paragraph D.5 which relates to Planning Commission Review. Please contact us, if we can provide additional information or answer any questions. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. 4014 \ I j A L Paul M. Kochevar, PE & P.L.S. No. 15760 President cc: Lester Schmidt Steve Stamey r /m I. - .. --FOR' PU.U.'ING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission. June 20. 1995 - Page 6 . ,0 DEVELOPMENT PLANS. < ~~D ~~Lots 1 & 2. Block 4. First Addition. Lone Pine Acres, Amendment to Development Plan 94-2, Lot ZA, Amended Plat Lester Schmidt/Applicant. Applicant's Representative Paul Kochevar stated the Applicant is requesting an Amendment to the original Development Plan approved in 1994. The original Plan included a fenced storage and parking area on the north side of the building with an extension of the fencing from the northwest property corner along the west property line to a gate attached to the northwest corner of the building. The fence and gate have not been constructed in this location. Instead, this area is being used for access to the storage yard and the rear of the building. A paved driveway and gate have been constructed to access the storage area on the east side of the building. Senior Planner Joseph reported the plan originally included a solid fence and landscaping on the east side of the site which was more responsive to neighborhood concerns regarding the appearance of the development and the storage area. The addition of this access on the east side has increased impervious coverage. Access to the storage area on the west side of the building has been constructed in a manner which permits.direct passage between the parking lots across the west property line. Construction of the fence along the west property line and the gate at the northwest corner of the building, as originally proposed, may present an obstacle to this shared access. Both properties are owned by the Applicant. Ralph Nicholas, 1616 N. Ridge Ln., reported the gate on the east side is never closed and the driveway contains a dumpster and vehicles visible from his property; he requested the original Development Plan be observed. Chairman Sager requested suggestions regarding additional landscaping to screen the gate and driveway. Representative Kochevar offered suggestions, adding that an automatic closer for the gate has been ordered. Commissioner Thomas clarified that a paved driveway and gate were installed Â·in defiance of the original Development Plan. Representative Kochevar stated that the Applicant was advised in April that although his actions were not approved by the Planning Commission, the . Applicant did meet zoning ordinance requirements and that the Planning Commission would have no jurisdiction over these changes. Commissioner Pohl requested the Town Attorney give an opinion on this statement. Commissioner Gilfillan questioned the function of the Planning Commission wheh asked to compromise an approved Development Plan. It was moved and seconded (Pohl-Burgess) the request for additional access to the storage yard on the east side be denied and the fenced enclosure and landscaped area be constructed as originally proposed for this area. and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Burgess, Gilfillan, A. Hix, Pohl, and Thomas. Those voting "No" Chairman Sager. The Applicant was advised he may appeal this decision to the Board of Trustees. Chairman Sager questioned the Planning Commission decision to require Applicant to comply with the original Development Plan when additional landscaping would provide proper screening of driveway and gate. RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-107(1)(g), C.R.S., hereby states its intention to annex the area described herein. The Board of Trustees finds and determines that the Petition filed with the Town requesting annexation of the area described herein is in substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107 (1) (g) , C. R. S. The Board of Trustees further finds and determines that the Petition is signed by persons comprising one hundred (100%) percent of the landowners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning one hundred (100%) percent of the area, excluding public streets, and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality. Such area, if annexed, will be known as "WATERBURY ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. Such area is described as follows: A portion of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 31, T5N, R72W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado described as commencing at the SE corner of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31; thence N. 42.20' W a distance of 691 feet; thence S 84.33' E a distance of 171.3 feet; thence N. 79.09' E a distance of 100 feet; thence S 08.39' W a distance of 289.5 feet; thence S 58.26' W a distance of 200 feet; thence N 70.19'W a distance of 154 feet; thence N 53.55' W a distance of 200 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 00030' W a distance of 400 feet; Thence S 80.47' W a distance of 337 feet; Thence N 00.58' W a distance of 400 feet; Thence N 80.47' E a distance of 320 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with Section 31-12-108, C.R.S., a public hearing shall be held on August 22, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Municipal Building, located at 170 MacGregor, Estes Park, Colorado, for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk shall give the notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S. - IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the plat of the Waterbury Addition be referred to the Planning Commission to begin the necessary procedures to make the property subject to the zoning ordinances of the Town. DATED THIS day of , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk June, 1993 PROCEDURE FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION NEW LIQUOR LICENSE MAYOR. The next order of business will be the public hearing on the application of Thomas W. Thomas, dba NOTCHTOP BAKED BOODS & NATURAL FOODS CAFE for a New Hotel & Restaurant Tavern x Beer & Wine 3.2% Retail Beer Liquor-Licensed Drug Store Club license located at 459 E. Wonderview Ave. #D-5 Â· TOWN ATTORNEY. The application was filed May 31, 1995 and, at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on June 13, 1995 the public hearing thereon was set at 7:30 P.M. on July 11, , 19 95 , and the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of this application and hearing were established to be 3.5 miles. This public hearing will be conducted in the following manner: The applicant will be allowed to state his case and present any evidence he wishes to support his application. The opponents will then be given an opportunity to state their .... case and present any evidence in opposition to the application. The applicant will be allowed a rebuttal limited to the evidence presented by the opponents. No new evidence may be submitted. The opponents will be allowed a rebuttal which may only rebut 1 the evidence of the applicants. No new evidence may be offered. The Board of Trustees may ask any questions of any person speaking at any time during the course of this hearing. At this hearing, the Board of Trustees shall consider the facts and evidence determined as a result of its investigation, as well as any other facts, the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood for the type of license for which application has been made, the desires of the adult inhabitants, the number, type and availability of liquor outlets located in or near the neighborhood under consideration, and any other pertinent matters affecting the qualifications of the applicant for the conduct of the type of business proposed. TOWN ATTORNEY will present the application and confirm receipt of the following: X Receipt of all necessary fees and hearing costs. The applicant is filing as an: X An individual. A Partnership. A Corporation. X The property is zoned C-D Commercial Downtown or X C-0 Commercial Outlying, which allows this type of business as a permitted use. X The notice of hearing was published on June 30, 1995 X The premises was posted on June 29, 1995 . 2 x There is a police report with regard to the investigation of the applicant. (There is a map indicating all liquor outlets presently in the Town of Estes Park available upon request.) The Town Attorney asks whether any of the Trustees have any questions regarding the application. Mayor Applicant please present your evidence. Ask the Town Clerk whether any communications have been received in regard to the application. The Town Clerk reads all communication. Ask the Board if there are any further questions. Indicate that all evidence presented will be accepted as part of the record. Ask the Board if they have any further comments. MAYOR. Declare the public hearing closed. SUGGESTED MOTION: Finding. The Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable 3 requirements of the neighborhood are/are not met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are/are not for the granting of this liquor license. Motion. Based upon the above findings, I move that this license be granted/denied. 4 DR 8404 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET ' DENVER CO 80261 COLORADO LIQUOR OR 3.2 % FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION 1. Applicant is a Date filed with Local Authority 1-3 1 -95< m Corporation (Attach DR 8177) ~ Individual (Attach DR 8404-1) F.E.I.N. U Partnership (Attach DR 8441) Limited Uability Company (Attach DR 8405) 94-1117/72 1 a. Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Social Security No. -rWOMAS VO . -0+OAAA'&; 2-16-94-0472 2. Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone Ne-Tut-rop i!,AKED 90025 +NATURAL Fac>DS CAFE :0 -79591-0(00 970- 5Â¥6-0272 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) 4 S-9 E \do#DERV i E uJ * Dr City County State ZIP Code 6251'G.5 PARK LAAMER- 6,5 SO.~17 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town State ZIP Code po ace, '4456 A-râ‚¬.5 P+RK Go 805- 17 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following question: Present Trade Name of That Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Type of License Present Expiration Date 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- Yes No ers or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? OR 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- ers or directors if a corporation) or manager ever; (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? Cl K (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? EM If you answered ges to 78, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8. Has a liquor license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. m 69 8a. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. m Ig 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school, or the principal campus of any college, university or El Â® seminary? 10. Has a liquer or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any 0 ~ current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line la of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that this license will be issued by virtue of ownership or under a lease? (If yes, attach a signed copy of deed or lease.) M= U Ownership W Lease n Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Landlord Tenant Expires/. / / 'HOMAS -,Â·-THWA5 .574Ah.EÂ·~ COM#Ek.'4L DUELGPAAEâ€¢/7, cri) Ahâ€¢. AleT-L*+TOP 8*KED 4.â€¢005 4.NA're*.AL FLaceSCLFâ‚¬ Attach a diagram of the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11*. (Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who has (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies) or will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST i 9-r /4A--T'L eÂ¥ ES-rES PARM- Po 76% 1390'E1165 A*RiC, co %031 7 Do 2.07 1+9 O? ~ E- PO 20% /5-41. PIVEHOTST,AIL 28379 (32.440,~o,-Hs A Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises All Optional Premises applicants must attach a copy of the local ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of Optional Premises licenses. Number of separate Optional Premises areas reqi lAsted EÂ¥, DR 8404 (2/94) Page 2 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No (a) Does'the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. , El 0 . 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach DR 8177: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and not for pecuniary gain? 00 (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? 00 (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? 16. Colorado Manufacturer, Wholesaler or Limited Winery applicants, answer the following: (a) Will the applicant store or sell alcoholic beverages at more than one location in Colorado? If "yes," provide the address of each location and explain the activity to be conducted at each location (e.g., warehouse, salesroom, etc.) (Attach DR 8438 for each location) 00 (b) If applicant is a wholesaler, does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. 00 (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain whether one has been applied for. m El 17. Nonresident Manufacturer (3.2% beer or malt liquor) or Importer (3.2% beer, malt, vinous or spirituous liquor) applicants, answer the following: (a) To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intend to ship your merchandise? (b) Does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. 00 (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain in detail. m El (d) Are you the primary source of supply in the U.S.? If "no," explain. E El (e) Are all your products registered in Colorado? If "no," attach DR 8440 and register said products. 00 18. Name of Manager (If this is an application for a Hotel and Restaurant License, theÂ·manager must also submit a Manager Registration Form Date of Birth (DR 8367) and Individual History Record (DR 8404-1). <.1 3 I 29 ~ ~* ~> t;* *=1 4 r. 4 * s ~ OATH OF APPLICANT .. 7/ ,, 1 I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. . ~~i~)tII:El:-- Title Date 2.-PL~ 61 ACK 5--3 j -9 3- 2 .1 + REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING"AUTHORITY 2 . .. ...Â© 41 3 ' i (Manufacturers, nonresident manufacturers, importers, Wholesalers, limited wineries, and'public transportation licenseesÂ« e disregard the section below.). *1. * Is this application for a: ~ New License U Transfer of Ownership U Other (specify) Each person required to file DR 8404-1: Yes No Has been fingerprinted 00 Background, NCIC and CCIC checked 00 The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. El El If "no," thebuilding will be completed and ready tor inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authonty for 8 TOWN, CITY D COUNTY Signature Title Date Signature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. Â£,t/, .~ TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department ./. 1.. .1 h t t/*DIEâ€¢ A. -= 1 14' iff:; 4- PL ~3 e :*RE,44&~/6384/4-* d W~~b,gÂ£j '24/ 1 1-4=71831& I 5,7\%.MA..4'i.J:~44*4;ji- 64.1 45,~* I :.1-.--1-i<-uTÂ«flatÂ·5>4<tm.*rre ,7~80 4 Â· LE, f .f,#Ev .,.... Ipl 4-01 - I Â£14199 046% >,1 ~f /441\21Â£.~1 'k X+PAA -: A . 2 - 1 -I- e. I< " , h>7, ~ /1. 4 June 16, 1995 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Notchtop Baked Goods & Natural Foods Cafe Beer & Wine Thomas, Thomas W. Ms. O'Connor: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Notchtop Baked Goods & Natural Foods Cafe. Sincerely, n 1/ / A.Â· , &41 / \-6.. ./OCA A Rand<Repola Captain DJR/jo (303) 586-4466 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 ~ DR 84044(02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary for the licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business Date Social Security Number(s) /40-rCH-To? MAKED 60005 +NAm#AL IrecoDS CAFE c.t//1/93- 1-14-94-067 z 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) -EtÂ¥0/,445, -[-tÂ¥0Â®i-5 u.) 1 i.4- 1441 -roAA 4. Mailing Address (if different from residence) Home Telephone PO BOK 49 yo, G.5-[ ES PAAK, 4-0 S oyl7 970-374- 1096 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 364 \|irl,-'- ~C, E-4Â·4,4. FLAL, <Lo <605-17 6. Date of Birth Place of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? 3 -17- 59 Du 80 004 $4 Â® Yes E No If Naturalized, state where Â· When Name of U.S. District Court Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate If an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number. - Permanent Residence Card Number 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Drivers License? If yes, give number, & state 570'/ 140 Bl M. C N Yes E No CA R72/163 10. Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment N~ovroP BA)LBO GooDS 4,9*-ruRA-L FooDS CAFE %3AKEAY - CAFE 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) Business Telephone 959 E.U.)002)624\60 140 5- 25795 342*â€žCo 9OS-/7 9 70 -3-â‚¬6-0171 13. Present Position OLDA; 2 4 14. Marital Status 15. Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER 21. Do you now, or have you ever held a Â§tate of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? 11 yes, answer in detail E Yes. Â® No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your driver's license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.),If yes, explain in detail. , El Yes X No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. CJ Yes Â® No 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO /6 / EVERGUER @STE,5 2*Ak (9 103-17 /0 -93 3 -95- 5-13 1/1 LUJ 10*825,-ry AVE- 30 GLIDER. C. *663 01- 099 9-93 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO 510-$ EM Pt-0764, gAA| L.v~Ne.# CoLA,U-ril *1 Â» ro~kuci '206â€¢â€¢UDEA.U) 90 10 7- ow~ 5., uc,K It- 49 5--9 3 Bouto EA MFOICAL C.E.Al r62 32.95- 30-n' St. 610-042â€ž co %030, (30QLC>g:,2- c.Â©ZZ @E51,4--2,4,Â¢r - 44,04 BAKE 1 I -46 -3-91 30 3 443 4 gCN- ROADS LEsS -TZAVELED B,KE -Toâ€¢~g. co PO S.. 9/97, Loyr...4. Co 410,1/ Ceo K 5--91 9-92 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) 50 \ 4. o_> p, 2< 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned 29. If partner, state whether Q General El Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) M-60 i 8-0-0 -KU Au,-U:Lj .' t*,11* kla,..0 . 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this busit~ss as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account /67/g.-T,L CE 561-ES PARK 1~7*4~46 -THoAAAS $ /â‚¬boo 1-DAAâ„¢- CL 1 1 20& AUS * St>Â§776 F. 1Homas .D.DiAA,2 -THÂ©,44 $ 5-000 D, Op') e. - Pirl'-1 Nole D- Grâ€¢â€¢â€¢64L -1-: -11-10 M Ad ) ST /VA--7 'L . C E 3-TE S 754 2-K- 1-heMAS 7 140.AA, $ 2-0000 C. -r#UAAAd D. .21 IAA) E -71.1 .0>,4*f $ , 4. 4 -,4 94*thotAPPIiÂ¢#!ltu~~i-,*., 64Â§44...24Â£47,r, ~vd~ Fey,~K ,-tt -~i~+~*-'~ â€¢~ I .-./. I ... * I P I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized @gnature Title Date 1... 0 LE) vi A- DR 8404 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ' LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET ' DENVER CO 80261 COLORADO LIQUOR OR 3.2 % FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION 1. Applicant is a Date file*with kocal Authority 4/14/95- m corporation (Attach DR 8177) * Individual (Attach DR 84044) F.E.I.N. ' D Partnership (Attach DR 8441) U Limited Liability Company (Attach DR 8405) 1 a. Name of Applicqnt(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Social Security No. bo,V.oâ€¢ 1 9-06-Â£9-u- OeÂ«Â£*ca_ $69 -51-\Â·S-V / 2. Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone (Ze..1/Lfbjuvs CACâ‚¬L .23363â‚¬u 5 86 -4 46 k 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) 6-5 Cl, 8,--1 1-kow. fu vk 66*1 41/2- City State ZIP Code Exk; ~cuA_ County L a.r. 0-14 Co 3 0.3-th 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town State ZIP Code 9-0 80*. R \g-7 (Elle:* Pav-L LO i O â‚¬-1-7 - 0 *b -1 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following question: Present Trade Name of That Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Type of License Present Expiration Date flcÂ»-Dljfv 0 01 L-ute- 03-3?609 -Coo< SeÂ£-r 4 b.3,-a- d-194*- 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- Yes No ers or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? E Â®- 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- ers or directors if a corporation) or manager ever; (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? m GL (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 0 fli If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8. Has a liquor license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. m X 8a. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. 01 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school, or the principal campus of any college, university or El 64 seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any U *2 current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 1 a of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that this license will be issued by virtue of ownership or under a lease? (If yes, attach a signed copy of deed or lease.) ' O W * Ownership EX Lease El Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name oflandlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Landlord Tenant DON Â¢Ct a. 4-ouwuk 9 2414...u.v~ Expires 54$Alt' low.â€ž*.22 t~â‚¬Ve. bis,4 11.~9.-(le-kiltvou k 3--\ i \Â«u Attach a diagram of the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, walls, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11 : (Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who has (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies) or will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST t) c;ved. 00Ukk- lip, 9.9 '0 0% 341 Ghicipwrt 14\2_ Duvu-< Â· ~- 0 l-J.k 0 t.UwallÂ« ~ ' 3 9 43-l ~l - 0# 1 Jtkt t. li) 41 24311 Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises All Optional Premises applicants must attach a copy of the local ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of Optional Premises licenses. Number of separate Optional Premises areas requesterl DR 8404 (2194) Page 2 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No (a) Does the applicant for a Uquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. , 00, 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach DR 8177: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and not for pecuniary gain? 00 (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch. lodge or chapter of a national organization which is operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? 00 (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? 16. Colorado Manufacturer, Wholesaler or Limited Winery applicants, answer the following: (a) Will the applicant store or sell alcot,olic beverages at more than one location in Colorado? If yes,0 provide the address of each location and explain the activity to be conducted at each location (e.g., warehouse, salesroom, etc.) (Attach DR 8438 for each location) 00 (b) If applicant is a wholesaler, does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. 00 (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes; attach a copy; if "no," explain whether one has been applied for. El El 17. Nonresident Manufacturer (3.2% beer or malt liquor) or Importer (3.2% beer, malt, vinous or spirituous liquor) applicants, answer the following: (a) To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intend to ship your merchandise? (b) Does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. El Il (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain in detail. 00 (d) Are you the primary source of supply in the U.S.? If "no," explain. 00 (e) Are all your products registered in Colorado? If "no," attach DR 8440 and register â‚¬ aid products. 00 18. Name of Manager (If this is an application for a Hotel and Restaurant License, the manager must also submit a Manager Registration Form Date of Birth (DR 8367) and Individual History Record (DR 8404-1). - ~1 - 1 - < 4'3. * 7 OATH OF*PPILICANT 2 .4 '. .,2 I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the be*of my knowledge. Aothefied Signaturi ,/ j /1 f ) . Â· Title Date O UJ '-91- r\ALA.s- .' ~ REPORT AND APPROVAL OF<LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY ' h, E I 8 D. y .. I I y...9 4 ./ ,; V (Manufacturers,'nonresident manufactOrers, impdrters, wholesalers; limited wineries, and public trlnsportationli*,see, 2 9 , ; I 4. disregard the section below.) . 44- * 3, U,?~g, 4 ' 4% .1 Is this application for a: U New License [*Transfer of Ownership E Other (specify) Each person required to file DR 8404-1: Yes No Has been fingerprinted 00 Background, NCIC and CCIC checked 00 The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. m u If "no," the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C. R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority lor U TOWN, CITY O COUNTY Signature Title Date Signature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above appro#al should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. 1 - 4 4.1 f #/ TOWN OF ESTES PARK 1 Police Department **Ari.,9 r GI,>~ u&:-54 - t-~Egge&~AREFU*0%*61 WV<*(,41*4 4~I 3.4444~ ' Â·Aj~;~, Â¥.~ -'-2 -- .--LIE> - - 16- *"Â· 4,-*ffi.*EF,.7/7.*K- % May 5, 1995 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Rendezvous Cafe Beer & Wine Oehlman, David Oehlman, Yolanda Ms. O'Connor: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for the Rendezvous Cafe. Sincerely, Randy Repola Captain DJR/jo (303) 586-4466 â€¢ PO. BOX 1287 0 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 DR 8404-1 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business Date Social Security Number(s) FeA.tezeÂ© 0 11 C.*-te_, 5 1 444 Sh 0 -1?L-LJTO \ 2. Your Ft,16&!anie (last, firs~middle) / 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) U CLULy 9-056 Oeld UA.Cul 4. MailinÂ£Address Of different from residence) Home Telephone P. 0 89. 261 6.4-te-f ~curL Lo. te,ret -0/67 (3033 7-76 -GLF.IL 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) tgo f 1%6 Rot Lupic,-,-* Go ggJ--0\ 6. Date of Birth Pike of Birth 7. U.S. Citizen? 4 \.\Z>\ U U - - c.-(A-\-Vtb v~v.., C.. [*Yes [3 No If Naturalized, state where .- When Name of U.S. District Court Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate Il an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number. Pegnanent Residence Card Number 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Drivefs License? If yes, give number 4 state 9/4" 43-0 hr bip V./\ g LAe_ IX.Yes C] No &&O -32.-'ru2 UVIL 10. Name of Present Employer 11. Type ot Business or Employment C. evitic,vov J C-t,~pe- (1.e-1.Â¥ - 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) Business Telephone 6--04 8 .9 -t--4,-v~ v- 8.Â·1 â‚¬*hth NA- C.O, .S-9 6 - brib i 13. Present Position 09 vitv- 14. Marital Status n 15. Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) 7 o\A-ziN 0 ttn\4-04 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place ot Birth n.lic\,h L. 64- ll-tv v-1-1 Lk 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation RenclÂ© oe $ C-CC~L S ele 19. Address of.Spouse's Present Employer S U.d- 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER 21. Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail. El Yes 'K[No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your driver's license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) If yes, explain in detail. , , El Yes ~No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. E Yes SNo 24. Military Service (branch) From TO Senal Number Type of Discharge 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO AtS Ek 0 4-OLU P \-- (L,\ac \4 1- Quha- 3 ULA 3 94 J .. U 9 4. 4 4 --v k (A&1 -, l<3,-U \.4-( 9 uh 3- ) 01-4 1 & lo 1 Ar/0 - u -\=4 n Pe lj, LUG Â£41- 4 u,J-> - u ko b LA ,_ 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO r. . , *lar 0 U +U fl-,t /49 ,s-\Ar 1--UL b Â£4Â£40 2,04 k,#2 6 Â¢ â‚¬ 9 h..ra 00021 1 - 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) S g\Â·e- o'v.,PWL, 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned 29. If partner, state whether m General O Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amount $ 23 1 SCC, 00 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account $ 4 9, ru-O , CA-L A b- 14Ut> 1 1.16- 0 64 -4,4 b Aw J 4 vt. out--4. $ \S- 012. eo b' Ok-L .23-7 A 4 3 6 739 -i WuÂ«_ $ $ Oath of Applicant 4 - f. f I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title Date - r-\r O DAD- 3--\ 4 41 - O U %4 DR 8404-1 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET D DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a pannership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAGING members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALLquestions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business ' Date Social Security Number(s) A#kew ov h Cick- 45-1 Abu- J~\Fl-1\-dis-49 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) 4 0 LAvac~ O exn\,A-c-â€ž4 4. Mailing ACIress (if different from residence) Home Telephone 9-0 80 * 7\77 E.X.\rel ~ArL Lo %000-07\Pl (113) 1-00 -21&1 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) l'&03 tz'& Ave- Lu,14 Liuwj LD 9 0,0-Dl 6. Date of Birth Place ofgrth 7. U.S. Citizen? 1 1 4.lun L. k. l,-Co .rv14.- ELYes [3 No If Naturalized, state where Â· - When Â· Name of U.S. District Court Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate If an Alien, Give Alien's Registration Card Number. . Permanent Residence Card Number 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Color Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Driver's License? If yes, give number, & state s U * 2/445 O/ F 2 Yes U No 6 444 -31-ay 4 <c \-\ 1. 10. Name of Fpeent Employer 11. Type ot Business or Employment 2 ~ i32-ve * dze v,OUV o v 1 C.wit (leat - GuD 12. Address of Business Where Employed (street number, city, state, ZIP) Business Telephone .Cs- 79 9, 01=-r-L, -~0' 4,1 AD fED,c-~FLA- Le , J-26 -\=494+ 13. Present Position 510 var 14. Marital Status 15. Namtof Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) 1.*14 V-vy*# e 4,0 Ch,w/D De.U\- al- 16. Spouse's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth U \\3\4 w 2_ A \1<Q rhAC< 17. Spouse's residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation 1 e_To D-422Â« itat ov 3 E--A+L 19. Address of Spouse's Pr6sent Employer .50 01 04Â£1-1-Lou,fÂ·~ un R.1 13'&-?ki 9Â£<L Le Ft.-,-7 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER 21. Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer License, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answer in detail E Yes [ZI'Â·No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE 011 DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not include traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your drivers license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages,) If yes, explain in detail. D . CJ Yes C~No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. U Yes &-No 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO 15-k; 1 0*xlp 9 L Lca-C \A V Q \, hâ‚¬ 1 u.\93 -sls- Co O â‚¬ (.LE &-9 \ A#1. 1.4 ,\+2.- 14 f 4 9 hab 4 /91- \Â£14) t<45- be - l.c.\,uk Â¥11. 141 LL \4 < 4\<h y 5 Ulft-O U Ittz- 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO 3 3 L,ne A vt k 14* A 04-J.1/ Ne.Auote\<- 01. ive frl,*.C.~U [2UA..UWJ \Ai caeh3~L- A > 1.1 ta\94 3-143- 7--Li J Lu,Â«-ew a +LQ, Mi- 2 - U.lu< 0 Â£1 - v.0,-twu~eb/. 'll49 jA\44 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) 28. If stockholder, number of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned 29. If partner, state whether El General Il Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) Amounts 3 1 S %-0 . ve 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account $ 49 , rviD ht A '0("-1-,DS-7\1 415 \4= S- t. At -c.L- b cÂ« 03 : * D\4.61. 4 $ i :sÂ» v-0 . ue 1~~ ~AL.4 811-Al.43\913(\ 1 La- $ $ Oath of Applicant . , :'. . .. I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title Date Ul Jo =,te ((2Â» 0 <s- l .-l f 4 .)- L uu u,uÂ« DR 8439 (12/91) poloradd Department of Revenue APPLICATION FOR A Liquor Enforcement Division 1375 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80261 SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (303) 866-3741 Â· APPLICATION MUST FIRST BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE EVENT. LIQUOR PERMIT ACCT. NO. Â· PREMISES MUST BE POSTED AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS BEFORE A HEARING CAN BE HELD. Â· APPROVED APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE LIQUOR EN- DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FORCEMENT DIVISION AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO THE EVENT. Print or typewrite in BLACK INK. LIABILITY INFORMATION Â· Attach diagram (81/2- x 11- maximum) showing where liquor will be served and COUNTY CITY INDUSTRY TYPE LIABILITY DATE consumed. Â· Attach copy of Certificate of Good Corporate Standing (non-profit) (issued by Secretary of State within last two years). STATE FEE PAID If Political Candidate, attach copies of reports and statements that were filed FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE MALT, VINOUS & SPIRITUOUS with the Secretary of State. (3.2 BEER ONLY) 45 - 09 LIQUOR 41 - 09 Attach copy of deed, lease, or written permission of owner for use of the premises. Â· Applicant must have Colorado Sales Tax Account (not Tax Exempt Number). (9) $ (9) $ Â· Applicant organization cannot obtain more than 10 Special Event Permits in one calendar year. IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT, YOU MUST BE NON-PROFIT AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (See back for details.) CHECKONE. E SOCIAL 2 CHARTERED BRANCH, LODGE or CHAPTER OF A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OR SOCIETY E FRATERNAL O RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION C] PATRIOTIC C| PHILANTHROPIC INSTITUTION U POLITICAL Â£ CHECK HERE IF APPLICANT IS A POLITICAL CANDIDATE U ATHLETIC J CHECK HERE IF APPLICANT IS A MUNICIPALITY OWNING ARTS FACILITIES TYPE OF SPECIAL EVENT APPUCANT IS APPLYING FOR: Your Local Licensing Authority (city or E FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE (3.2 Beer) (State Permit Fee - $10.00 per day) county) will indicate the amount of their * MALL VINOUS AND SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR (State Permit Fee - $25.00 per day) permit fee. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OselizATION OR~LITICâ‚¬LpANDIDATE Sales Tax # Â£0â€¢9 3 --/-12Â£k ace-rns k i/25- A lu,4 4%Â·iti*Â·~ .PN:-Â· 1101.161.0060 2. MAILING ADdRESS OF ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE: / 3. ADDRESS OF PLACE TO HAVE SPECIAL EVENT: / 7-0 *64 /310 Stc. /i 1 75.-sâ‚¬ ball ffe /ch CITY OR TOWN STATE ZIP CITY OR TO*N STATE ZIP 6 +ts-7Â£r k Ce 365 11 Lite-3 ~-Fk r k 6 264,1 NAME DATE OF BIRTH HOME ADDRESS (Street, City, State, Zip) PHONE NUMBER 4. PRES./SECY OF ORG. or POLITICAL CANDIDATEd -=:12# a A -parcuâ€¢,rjl , -Â¢~ --kf /04, N Lowe 15 jes 1 *L ior 17 4-70-5%-i)*, 5. EVENT MANAGER: 4.,te-: A -C) tir (1) 6-0.~ I-,,- 3Â·r /0 4, A Â£Â£'u a Este,74ia:,7 970'50Â¥.-21-yl 6. HAS APPLICANT ORGANIZATION OR POLITICAL CANDIDATE BEEN 7. IS PREMISES NOW LICENSED UNDER STATE LIQUOR OR BEER CODE? ISSUED A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT THIS CALENDAR YEAR? [~146 m YES HOW MANY DAYS? [3ENO ~ YES TO WHOM? LIST BELOW THE EXACT DATE(S) FOR WHICH APPLICATION IS BEING MADE FOR PERMIT StÂ· Date. 9/9/41 -9.w. Date: 9/>6/f 3/ Date: Date: Date: Hours: From: F.20 A .m. Hours: From: fbâ€¢ A .m. Hours: From: .m. Hours: From: .m. Hours: From: To: 7206 f m. To: 7,,ar.In. To: .m. To: .m. TO: OATH OF APPLICANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that I have read the foregoing application and all attachments thereto, and that all infor*tion therein is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAâ„¢ 1133â‚¬00-, 19 # DATE: , Ch-* r REPORT AND APPROVAL OF LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY 9 he foregoing application has been examined and the premises, business conducted and character of the applicant is satisfactory, and we do report that such permit, if granted, will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 48, C.R.S., as amended. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY (CITY OR COUNTY) SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: (Over) EE - /-2---rlt. L /1 N c C- J i C.-J /4 ;t -4 W.Y.. 23 -6 \ I 0, \ - --5.6 8 E 6 -1 .. 0 - N \A/+ E --- 5 L A KE "' 69/5 t . \\ \\ \\ (11(U<tal, \\ \\ 1 1- 4 \\ ; Il -- \N ,- 1.\ 1 - It \ 222-7-- O 1.1 1 Full, 1 0 1 -Hoz . .1 t \ t \ - I - -1 4*L--- - - -3 Â»1,8-03Â«D ?6 ke' 4:G 0J 2 7-l l-LYM.fe.ik 1 1 1 0 3-23*2 0 12!EKER.! . ft-- _ ~ --1 Sis -7 -1-1]13 1 0 \ 51â‚¬ Crk /2 ' -- 4 -9-- - ---I --- -.....-----0-4.. - STAK/LLY PARK 6 57-/5 FARK, CO JUL-06-1995 10:21 HAMMOND, CLARK & WHITE 3036699380 P.03 - . JA~ES G. FELT, P.C. AMORNEYS AT LAW , 319 NORTH WEBER STREET COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 80903 JAMES O. FELT TELEPHONE (719) 471-1212 CHARLES T. HOUGHTON TELEFAX (719) 471-1234 June 27, 1995 Mr. Gregory A. White Hammond, Clark and White 200 E. 7th Street, Suite 418 Loveland, CO 80537 RE: Stanley Hotel Entrance Drive Dear Mr. White: By way of a letter dated May 22, 1995 you informed me that you would be working with Mr. Findley to get Title in the name of the Stanley Hotel to the gap between the right-of-way line and the south property line of the hotel site. Please let me know the status of this matter, so that I may apprise my client. Thank you for you cooperation in this matter. If you have questions or if you need anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. I await your response. SinFTely, r-2*s\ G-~:*TA,F.# 1 # ~ Y lr)( I ,/ /4 8\// 1 1.-11 /l K I \ 11\ ~ \ i 4 TT -Â·+4%4:*7-... . 1/ 7 }. ~# li tv // Le:grl â€¢24.Viougbiton' V CTH/cjk CC: Charles Lederman ESTES PARK SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, INC=Â«pIE=111*1111 Post Office Box 3047 â€¢ Estes Park, CO 80517 Â· Telephone 970-586-5175 June 15, 1995 W.O. 2390C Mr. Roger Ream Grand Heritage Hotel Company 410 Sevem Avenue, Suite 406 Annapolis, MD 21403 Re: The Stanley Hotel Dear Mr. Ream: The small portion of adjoining ownership that exists at the hotel entrance has been described in a street dedication document. We contacted the adjacent owner, explained the situation and requested his consideration in signing the document. The copy enclosed is the result of this effort. Mr. Art Anderson at the Town Hall was given the original of the document and will take it to the Town Board in the first part of July. There is no doubt the Town Board will authorize the Mayor to sign the Deed of Dedication. If you need confirmation of this process, call Mr. Anderson at 586-5331, Monday through Thursday. It is our desire to provide efficient professional engineering and surveying services for the Stanley Hotel property. There is no other firm in this area that has more knowledge of the intricacies related to this property. . Please contact us, if we can provide additional information or answer any questions. Respectfully yours, Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc. Paul M. Kochevar, P.E. & P.L.S. No. 15760 President cc: Art Anderson DEED OF DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Stanley Views Limited, a Colorado Corporation, being the owner of certain real property located in Larimer County, Colorado, hereby dedicates the real property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, for use as a public roadway, for utility and drainage facilities, and landscaping. Grantor warrants title to the same, subject to current taxes, easements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. Dated: 0 Stanley Views Limited, a Colorado Corporation By-*Â¥~~..9~- W. Brooks Findley, Sr., President STATE OF \24-at ) )SS COUNTY OF denoson , Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8 47 day of JEAL 1945 , by W. Brooks Findley, Sr., President of Stanley Views Limited, a Colorado Corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires : 12-22)44- IL 04Â«> AMY G. LINGO NotatyPublA U 25 NOTARY PUBLIC 0--42 too 9701<4 92=,[ kline>-- --lucE>9 Commission Expires 12-23-95 Address V ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION The Town of Estes Park, Colorado, a Municipal Coporation, hereby accepts this Deed of Dedication according to its specified terms. DATED: . TOWN OF ESTES PARK By Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk EXHIBIT A A tract of land located in Section 24, T5N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado being more particularly described as commencing at the E lM corner of said Section 24, as monumented by a G.L.O. brass cap, and with all bearings contained herein being relative to the East line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 24 considered as bearing S 00Â°05'00" W; thence S 00Â°05'00" W a distance of 673.90 feet along the East line of said SE 1 M; thence N 88Â°36'00" W a distance of 1874.42 feet; thence S 05Â°00'00" E a distance of 214.58 feet; thence S 47Â°00'00" E a distance of 156.87 feet; thence S 80Â°00'00" E a distance of 365.39 feet; thence S 88Â°30'00" E a distance of 705.60 feet; thence 456.32 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve has a delta angle of 83Â°00'00", a radius of 315.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S 47Â°00'00" E a distance of 417.45 feet; thence S 05Â°00'00" E a distance of 125.74 feet; thence S 43Â°50'01" W a distance of 172.79 feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of the Stanley Historic District Road; thence the following four courses along said Northerly right-of-way line; 107.07 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Southeast, said curve has a delta angle of 27Â°15'58", a radius of 225.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S 57Â°27'59" W a distance of 106.07 feet; thence S 43Â°50'00" W a distance of 181.90 feet; thence N 46Â°10'00" W a distance of 15.00 feet; thence 15.81 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Northwest, said curve has a delta angle of 04Â°09'08", a radius of 218.17 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S 45Â°54'34" W a distance of 15.81 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence 71.98 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Southeast, said curve has a delta angle of 68Â°44'15", a radius of 60.00 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears S 56Â°55'00" W a distance of 67.74 feet; thence 68.02 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Northwest, said curve has a delta angle of 17Â°51'44", a radius of 218.17 feet and is subtended by a chord which bears N 56Â°55'00" E a distance of 67.74 feet; The above described tract contains 601 square feet, more or less. The above description was prepared by Estes Park Surveyors & Engineers, Inc., P.O. Box 3047, Estes Park, Colorado 80517. ( June 7, 1995, W.O. 2390C) \ #2065 8A . 1 =27'15'58- /.Cy = 225.00' 1 W,6044 / . S57'27'59"W ~ \)/ A / .106.07' /9 \ ,. /11 3 1 4 1 ~ FN[>-PaC 4 .-.-. ,#9485 '/ / STANLEY HISTORICAL DISTRICT ROAD ( PUBLIC ) 0 1 j DaA ' /1Â¢h -*....-----I---------------------- , 8-04'09'08" / _ ~ R =218.IT / 1% \ C = S45'54'34"W / Cd Â¢/4 \ 1 15.81' /.4. / /.2,/ /44-\\ / ty./ \ I , 0/ \ \ A\ 1 )8A . V,%- \ / 1 = 68'4475"* e. / ./ \ REC. # 9303908 , R.O.W. DEDICATION 1 1 : = ~5'00"w \ ' LOT 4, N 4690'00- W STANLEY HISTORIC 67.74* 15.00'08 A DISTRICT SUB. SE COR. ,/ TOTAL CURVE (DEED) SEC. 24-5 0/ D = 153'50'01" ALUMINUM NO. 9485 ' A= 161.09' R- 0 - ' * C = S &655'W 116.89' / 1 I > NOTE: GAP BETWEEN SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND R.O.W. LINE MEYERS | , ~ 1 ADDITION I , , 1,- / Fl / 1 rok 1 1 1 SITE. 1 ROCK ti~V . ' Â· ... 4 - '*'y#)4'.- / - 1-- 1 ACRES r.Â¥lt'T, 7~Â· ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1. / , 1 0 1 . \ -ekiker... 1 , ,'' LEGEND 1 \\ \\ >27/ 1 \ 1-- '' (WEST 473.629 DEED INFORMATION AL FRESCO ', , / WEST 473.62' A ACTUAL (SURVEYED) INFORMATION PLACE I WEST 473.62' DaA DEED 8 ACTUAL INFORMATION U.S. HWY 34-BY-PASS , ' 1 COMPANY OF COLORADO 1 DATED MAY 4,1995 VICINITY MONUMENTATION NOTE: - I INDICATES 1/2" RFRAR WITH NTC 05050 Â£ 1