The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1995-02-14fl BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, February 14, 1995 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated January 24, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Works, January 26, 1995. B. Board of Adjustment, February 7, 1995 (acknowledgement only). C. Community Development, February 7, 1995. D. Light and Power, February 9, 1995. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Senior Center - Authorize Town Staff to Begin Pre-Grant Phase for Building Remodel. 2. Public Works Committee, January 26, 1995: A. Estes Valley Recreation District Golf Course Management Agreement - Approval. B. Reimbursement Resolution - Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District (S.I.D.). C. Roadway and Water Line Design Scope of Services with Van Horn Engineering for Park Entrance Estates S.I.D. - Approval. D. Vehicle Purchase - Approval of Budget Expenditure. E. 1995 Water Line Projects Scope of Services with Rocky Mountain Consultants - Approval. F. Glacier Creek Storage Tank Scope of Services with Rocky Mountain Consultants - Approval. 3. Community Development, February 7, 1995: A. Horse Show Agreements: Rocky Mountain Miniature Horse Club and Colorado Arabian Horse Club - Approval. B. Parade Permits: Duck Fest Parade/Rotary Club, May 6 and Hippey Dippey Do Wop Parade/Chamber of Commerce, June 3 - Approval. C. Sales Tax Collection Policy - Approval. 1 C 4. Light and Power Committee, February 9, 1995: A. Vehicle Purchase - Approval of Budget Expenditure. 5. Planning Commission: A. Public Hearing. Replat of Lot 131, Al Fresco Place Addition, John Grace/Applicant. B. Public Hearing. Amended Plat of Lot 10, Block 2, Park Entrance Estates, Ted Chittwood/Applicant. C. Public Hearing - Annexation: 1. Grey Fox, First Addition a. Resolution - Eligible for Annexation b. Ordinance - Annexation. c. Ordinance - Zoning. 2. Grey Fox, Second Addition. a. Resolution - Eligible for Annexation b. Ordinance - Annexation. c. Ordinance - Zoning. 6. Liquor Licenses: A. Transfer of Ownership. China Town Super Seafoods, 160 S. St. Vrain Ave., Hotel Â·and Restaurant License. From Johnson and Maria Lin to Peter Ngovs. 7. Town Administrator's Report: A. CIRSA - Casualty Coverages. 4 B. 8. Motion to Enter Executive Session to Consult with the Town Attorney Concerning Litigation Matters. 2 1.--#C.1.-77+ 1,14Â£ ..:*2~W.49, j',,-':444~7Â·3) 4 i " prÂ· Â·â€¢ 2 . .â€ž 3: r. 4; -4.Lti.:Y%i. h .., . 2 T r , .4 F *' 6 ,-4.- '. ...1, 1 l<O~j~) RETIRED and SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM 145 East Mountain 9 700 East Fourth 220 Fourth Street ~: Fort Collins, CO 80524 Loveland, CO 80537 Estes Park, CO 80517 (303) 482-8943 (303) 669-5460 (303) 586-9486 February 14, 1995 Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 ' . Estes Park, CO 80517 Good Evening: On behalf of staff and Advisory Board of RSVP, we enjoy taking this opportunity to thank you for your generous check for $2,500. RSVP's mission is: the placement, follow-up and recognition of volunteers age 55 or better in public and private non-profit agencies, where they find meaningful assignments matched to their skills and interests to benefit community; and, the management of a set of special services whereby volunteers help older adults and persons with disabilities to continue living independently and safely in their own homes. Last year RSVP's Estes Park volunteers worked nearly 40,000 hours! This represents a savings to the community of $180,000. We thought you'd like to know. Thank you so very much. 4.-- 10 4.v t.--,-'Joan Hayes 0/ Coordinator of Volunteers RSVP 7-14%1.<) Don Tebow RSVP Advisory Board 01!' :ipsÂ·nov :.t,onscred by CARE-A-VAN, RSVP is funded bv orarihi. frc-Â· Th:- NEÂ·tiona' Sonie, Serv,ce Corps. Ur- tr i Vv'.i.'. Fort Collins, Loveland. Ch :1,4 111(Â· Community Folindation of No:lnern Colorado and v,2,i, ,.:Â· r .illÂ·13: 143:33 :7(-1 corporatÂ·Dns. RSVP's voL- :,Â·-, Â·-5 serve a wide variety of - Tad also Ile'P other seniors and persons v.'Rb disabil:ticÂ·_ :c:n:.; . .ii. Â· p i. 1 ,+' i"iÂ· i ov:Â·67 r,Â·-inn- 24 :94: 6 0-crrovided without charge. Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado, . 220Warv 84, , ., 19.9.5. Minutes of a . Regular. . . meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . 24.t~ . day of ... .January. ., A.D., 19.9.5. at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor ......................... Present: Mayor Trustees: H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, Stephen W. Gillette, William J. Marshall, Also Present: Michael E. Miller Gary F. Klaphake, J. Donald Pauley 1 Town Administrator Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk i Absent: Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:31 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. None. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated January 10, 1995. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light and Power, January 12, 1995. B. Public Safety, January 19, 1995. C. Planning Commission, January 17, 1995 (acknowledgement only). It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Pauley) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. A. Office Copy Machine - Budget Expenditure. $9.644. The Light and Power Committee recommended approval of the replacement of an existing 10-year old copy machine. The budgeted amount is $10,000; $6,700 from the Light & Power fund, and $3,300 form the Water Fund. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Marshall) staff be authorized to purchase a Minolta EP420 for $9,644, directing staff to dispose of the existing copier, possibly to a non-profit organization, and it passed unanimously. B. Electric Rate Study Consulting Services - Budget Expenditure. $5.000. The Committee also recommended approval to contract with M. E. Kiburz and Associates to perform a 1995 Electric Rate Study, not-to-exceed $5,000. The purpose of the study is to design electric rates that would be applicable to the RMNP administrative loads and the Bureau of Reclamation. The rate design would separate the Town's delivery costs from PRPA purchase power costs. Phase I includes rate design for $3,000 and, if the Town elects to implement the new rates, the rate hearing portion of the proposal is estimated at $2,000 (Phase II). Director Matzke confirmed that the 1995 Budget Board of Trustees - January 24, 1995 - Page 2 contains fundihg for both phases of this project. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Pauley) the Mayor be authorized to execute the Contract as noted, not-to-exceed $5,000, and it passed unanimously. 2. A. Communications Equipment - Budget Expenditure. $50.000. Trustee Pauley declared a potential conflict of interest and stated he would not participate in discussion nor vote. The Public Safety Committee recommended approval of an upgrade of the Dispatch Communications Equipment. Administrator Klaphake reviewed the project advising that the project is targeted for completion during the first quarter of 1995; Motorola was the only bidder due to equipment compatibility; and Motorola has proven to be competitive both in price and service. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Marshall) the $50,000 budget expenditure for communications equipment be approved, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Gillette, Marshall and Miller. Those voting "No" none. Those "Abstaining" Trustee Pauley. B. Accountability Committee - Update. Administrator Klaphake briefed the Trustees on the recommendation of the Public Safety Committee on the formation of an Accountability Committee for Town Government and requesteda determination be made on the formation of such a Committee. Trustee comments included: the Public Safety Committee opted to include the entire Town government not only the Police Department as originally presented; the new committee would consider policy questions, not personnel; such committees generally help improve an entity; support of the new committee on a trial basis; concern of public perception that the Town Board and staff may not be "user friendly"; accessibility of Trustees; whether concern, as expressed by one citizen, is well-founded; and experience that the outcome of a similar committee was proven ineffective. Administrator Klaphake reviewed potential guidelines as contained in the Public Safety Committee minutes dated January 19, 1995. Conduct of the new committee would be similar to the Community Breakfast meetings and deal with Town policies and operations. Following additional discussion, it was moved and seconded (Gillette/Pauley) Administrator Klaphake and an additional staff member be available to any citizen to discuss Town policies and operations for a four-month trail basis on the first Tuesday of the month (February 7, March 7, April 4, and May 2) at 6:30 P.M. in the Board Room, and it passed unanimously. Staff confirmed that as a formal committee is not being appointed, the citizen/staff meetings will not be subject to the "Open Meetings Law"; the meetings will be advertised to the public; and Trustees may attend should they desire. The Mayor confirmed that these meetings will not preclude the citizens from communicating with the Trustees on an individual basis. 3. Grey Fox Addition Annexation. It was . moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the public hearing for the Annexation of Grey Fox Addition be continued to February 14, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 4. Resolution #3-95 Reappropriating 1994 Encumbered Funds to the 1995 Budget. Finance Officer Vavra reviewed and read the Resolution, and it was moved and seconded (Pauley/Doylen) Resolution #3-95 be approved, and it passed unanimously. Due to a scheduling conflict, Trustee Marshall withdrew from the meeting. Board of Trustees - January 24, 1995 - Page 3 5. Town Administrator's Report: A. Comprehensive Plan Update. Staff reported that the number one goal for 1995 is completion of the Comprehensive Plan. A work schedule was reviewed and staff has scheduled May 31 for completion of the draft, which will include recommendations for'adoption. Staff will be advised that the Comprehensive Plan is designated as a Number 1 priority--all else will yield to this project. Discussion followed on a recent meeting where citizen desires were to form one Planning Commission for the entire Estes Valley. The concept received support; however, implementation cannot be accomplished without enabling legislation. The Trustees expressed their support of the concept, urging the Mayor to initiate the process by contacting State Senator Matsunaka and State Representative Kaufman. Staff will contact CML to seek their support and assistance. B. Senior Citizen Center Update. Administrator Klaphake advised that Jim Dunlap/Senior Center Board Member conducted a survey to enhance the Center's vision and to plan for future facilities and services. While the results are unscientific, a 28.8% return was received. Survey results were identified for age groups, income groups, marital status, physical challenges, transportation, gender, volunteerism and member status. In summary, Mr. Dunlap stated that the Senior Center "is not meeting the needs of the senior population." The Board commended Mr. Dunlap for his effort on conducting the survey. Staff briefed the Trustees on operations: the Center is referred to as a "contracted meal site" which, with an Agreement with Larimer County, allows all Estes Park meal preparation to occur on site--meals are not prepared in Fort Collins and delivered to Estes Park. Congregate meal site statistics for 1989 confirm 7,400 meals on site and 3,900 home deliveries for a total of 11,400 meals. In 1993, 8,600 meals on site, 4,500 home deliveries for a total of 13,173 meals. Based upon Health Department discussions, the kitchen does not meet standards. This deficiency is strictly based upon equipment, not food preparation. Deficiencies include building use as it is not ADA accessible. The van formerly used for transportation must be handicapped accessible, insurance must be obtained and the driver must be licensed by P.U.C. With regard to governance, the Senior Center Board of Directors is elected by the membership. If the board members were formally appointed by the Mayor, the members could be included in the Town's liability insurance. Senior Center board members have paid $800 for the liability insurance coverage. The Town owns the building and leases it to the Senior Center; the Center manages operations. Copies of all agreements and associated documents Will be made available and become part of the official records of the Town. 5, Board of Trustees - January 24, 1995 - Page 4 Discussion followed, with the Town Board supporting the following: (1) staff initiate the pre-grant process to obtain a local commitment 50/50 match for funding of the building rehdbilitation; (2) staff, with input from the Center, prepare an estimate on design and remodeling costs for the 1996 Budget; (3) there be no change in governance and transportation; and (4) all future contracts be executed byÂ· the Mayor. Administrator Klaphake advised that he held a meeting with Larimer County and Senior Center representatives, and all are in agreement with the four items mentioned above. C. GO Colorado funds are now available for open space, parks, trails and outdoor recreation areas, and the grant application deadline is February 10. Staff requested authorization to submit the following projects 'for grant approval: (1) new ADA-approved restrooms at the fairgroundb, approximately' $60,000; and (2) finish the remaining 600' of the Lake Estes Hike/Bike Trail from the Lake Estes Marina to Highway 34 signage and landscaping, approximately $75,000. Sufficient funds are in the 1995 Budget for the 2/1 matching grants. It was moved and seconded (Miller/Pauley) the request approved, and it F passed unanimously. Go Colorado funding may also be available for the Meadowdale open space, purchase. This application deadline is in April and it involves the Land Trust for funding, Larimer County as theÂ·public entity, and Town staff for processing. Acting upon staff's request, it was moved and seconded (Dekker/Doylen) the Board enter Executive Session to discuss land negotiations, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 9:06 P.M. Mayor Town Clerk BRADFORIPUBLISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee January 26, 1995 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Doylen and Miller Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Public Works Director Linnane, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:02 A.M. ESTES VALLEY RECREATION DISTRICT (EVRPD) GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT -RENEWAL. Pursuant to the 18-hole golf course remodeling project in 1990 where the Town formed the Building Authority and issued bonds (cops), the EVRPD and Town executed a 5-yr. Management Agreement for said golf course. Notice of renewal was due June 1, 1994 and District Chairman Repola advised that due to an oversight by the EVRPD, notice of renewal was not issued until November 29, 1994. The District is seeking an additional 5-yr. renewal period. Paragraph 15 of the Agreement states that "This Agreement shall automatically renew for additional one-year periods following either the end of the first five-year term, or the second five-year term, whichever is applicable, unless this Agreement is terminated by either party..." Chairman Repola stated that this property is extremely important; payments from the golf course improvement fund are making the bond payments; and the 5-yr. term assists in the District's planning and projects. In addition, the District is reviewing a multi-year commitment for new golf carts and they would like a 5-yr. renewal due to financing of these carts. Based upon Paragraph 15, the Committee believes the Agreement has automatically been renewed for one year to January 15, 1996, and no further action is necessary at this time. Chairman Gillette confirmed that the Agreement is binding and serves both agencies well, the Town is pleased with the District's management, and that this discussion is not to be perceived as the Town intends to seize operations of the golf course. When the District submits their renewal notice (prior to June 1, 1996), items of discussion will include a 5-yr. renewal option, and the financing for the new golf carts. Staff reported that a written memorandum addressing the automatic renewal language contained in Paragraph 15 will be obtained from the Town Attorney. STREET CUT STANDARDS - REOUEST AUTHORIZATION TO UPDATE. Public Works Director Linnane advised that staff has confirmed that the Town's street cut standards are very lenient as compared to CDOT and County standards which is affecting the integrity of the roadways (i.e. settlement and cracks). The street cuts require increasing amounts of maintenance and results in less than smooth surfaces. Director Linnane reviewed Manager Sievers' memorandum identifying an 18-item list of potential revisions, and of particular note were: l. CDOT requires a 50' overlay on either side of the trench, the full width of the street. IRADFOROPUILISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - January 26, 1995 - Page 2 2. All wheel or saw cuts in asphalt be straight lines. 3. To eliminate settlement, require the contractor to perform soil compaction tests during backfill for all trench work. 4. Encourage/mandate use of a flowable backfill. 5. Contractor to be held solely responsible for meeting all requirements. A range of permit fees for several counties was also reviewed, and staff confirmed that the current permit fee does not cover the cost of inspection. Director Linnane confirmed that utility agencies are contacted well in advance of street overlaying in an attempt to coordinate all street work prior to asphalting; however, this procedure does not eliminate street cuts. Manager Sievers noted that the standards were revised approximately five years ago and all excavating contractors were advised in writing - this procedure will again be followed. The Committee recommends staff prepare and submit a draft street cut permit to the Committee which will include a revised rate structure, and advise excavation contractors of the meeting where they may offer their comments. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE - DOWNTOWN MAIL DELIVERY. During a recent Community Breakfast meeting, Vivian Moyers inquired why home mail delivery is unavailable for the downtown area. Staff reported that when the Postal Service and the Town negotiated the cluster box project, the Post Office denied door to door service. Individual rural boxes were offered at centralized locations and the Town rejected this option and decided on the centralized cluster boxes. Postmaster Glowacki reported that during past discussions, the Post Office submitted two proposals for downtown delivery, and that this service would negatively impact all mail box rentals: the smallest box rent is $8.00/yr. and it would be increased to $20.00/yr.; the largest box rent is $55.00/yr. and it would , be increased to $144.00/yr. The increase is put in place as mail delivery would be available to everyone and the mail boxes become a premium service. In addition, businesses would be required to install mail slots or designate places for mail delivery/pickup, the sidewalks (particularly the north side of Elkhorn Ave.) must be free of snow, and designated parking spaces along Elkhorn Ave. must be provided from approximately 11:30 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. The requirements listed above are also based upon Postal Service criteria of delivery within a 1/4-mile radius of the Post Office. Elaine Nelson, Delivery Program Officer/U. S. Postal Service stated that businesses can have door to door delivery or centralized delivery--centralized delivery is encouraged as it is more economical; centralized delivery would also cause the box rents to be increased. Director Linnane reported cluster box installations are being scheduled in five phases, and that two phases encompassing the south end have been completed. The Third Phase location includes the Lone Pine Area; Phase 4 is along Fall River; and Phase 5 is down Riverside/Moraine. These phase locations are preliminary and may change. A total of $23,000 has been allocated for each phase. Ms. Moyers commented that mail delivery was available to all residential and business customers at her former residence. In BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - January 26, 1995 - Page 3 Estes Park, the Post Office gave her the option of installing a private rural box--a service for which she must pay. Discussion followed, with Chairman Gillette noting that the Postal Service and Town must work together for the needs and desires of all citizens. The Committee recommends the Postal Service submit a revised proposal, in writing, for downtown mail delivery, taking into consideration the Town concerns which include, but are not limited to, door to door delivery for businesses without negatively impacting rental fees for the boxes. The Committee thanked Postal Service representatives for their report. PARK ENTRANCE ESTATES - DISCUSSION ON SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND REOUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR ROADWAY AND WATER LINE DESIGN. Park Entrance Estates was annexed in 1994. The Annexation . Agreement specified that the Town would assist in the formation of a Special Improvement District (S.I.D.) for roadway improvement (asphalt, drainage facilities, etc.) for Blocks 1 and 2, and water main improvements for Block 2. Formation of the S.I.D. requires voter approval, and assuming the District if formed, an election would be held in November, 1995. Staff advised that the affected homeowners were aware of the cost estimates prior to annexation.q The Committee reviewed the scope Of services which includes preliminary engineering, final design and construction management engineering and time schedule. Cost estimates for four scenarios are being included in the RFP to determine the best alternative: roadway and water main for Blocks 1 and 2; roadway only for Blocks 1 and 2; roadway for Blocks 1 and 2 and water main for Block 2; and water main installation for Blocks 1 and 2 after roadway construction. Bid results are as follows: Van Horn Engineering ................... $25,570 Estes Park Surveyors ................... 33,200 Rocky Mountain Consultants ............. 50,260 The specifications were vague with respect to the construction management which has been clarified with all three engineering firms--all are satisfied with the bidding process. Therefore, approximately $7,200 (250 hours) will be added to Van Horn's bid (low bidder) for a total bid of $32,770. (Identical hours were added to Estes Park Surveyors' bid, and Van Horn remained the low bidder.) Discussion followed, with the Committee recommending the adjusted low bid not-to-exceed $32,770 submitted by Van Horn Engineering be accepted. VEHICLE PURCHASE - REOUEST APPROVAL. The 1995 Budget includes $80,000 for a new snowplow and dump truck. Staff requested authorization to proceed utilizing the State Bid/Sole Source Bid process where Rocky Mountain International (cab and chassis) Trucks and MacDonald Equipment (plow/dump truck components) would provide the vehicle for $81,423.00. A $600 rebate is being offered by MacDonald Equipment to display the truck at the Estes Park Snow and Ice Conference, reducing the cost to $80,823. The truck is over-budget by $823, however, certain line- item accounts could be adjusted to cover the deficit. The life expectancy of the new truck is approximately 10 years. The Committee recommends staff be authorized to purchase the vehicle as defined above for $80,823, suggesting staff attempt to raise the $600 display price. BRAOFOAOPUSLISHINGCO HtUUMU Ur rriw,-ccull,luo .. j Public Works Committee - January 26, 1995 - Page 4 1995 WATER LINE PROJECTS - REOUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Committee reviewed Rocky Mountain Consultants (RMC) scope of services which includes preliminary and final design for portions of West and East Elkhorn and Big Horn Drive. Staff negotiated the price down to $23,594 which is below the budget estimate of $37,500. If project construction cannot be completed prior to Memorial Day, it will be delayed until after Labor Day. Affected property owners have not yet been notified of the project. The Committee recommends acceptance of the not-to-exceed price of $23,594 for the Scope of Services submitted by RMC. GLACIER CREEK STORAGE TANK - REOUEST APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES. RMC submitted a scope of services for engineering services related to the Glacier Creek 1-million gallon treated water storage tank in the amount of $45,640. Staff has been negotiating with the YMCA to place the tank on their property and their condition of approval is that the project be completed prior to Memorial Day or after Labor Day. Director Linnane confirmed that this project is included in the 1995 Budget, therefore the Committee recommends acceptance of the not-to-exceed price of $45,640 submitted by RMC. LAKE ESTES HIKE/BIKE TRAIL - REOUEST APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER. Staff requested approval of a $960.00 change order for two additional culverts along the north shore Of Lake Estes necessitated due to drainage concerns. The Committee recommends approval of the change order as presented. Any future change orders will be collected and jointly submitted for approval. REPORTS. CDOT Highways 7 and 34 Projects. CDOT initially scheduled these projects for the Spring/Summer of 1996. Right-of-way negotiation for Hwy. 34 is minimal; however, Hwy. 7 requires significate right- of-way acquisition. The projects will now be separated and Hwy. 34 will be completed in 1996 and Hwy. 7 in 1997. CDOT held a citizen input meeting concerning these projects and a newsletter will be published for all affected property owners, including the Town Board. A meeting specifically for hotel owners along Highway 34 is also scheduled. CDOT Highways 34/36 Bridge and Intersection Project. Replacement of the Hwys. 34/36 bridge and intersection widening are now #3 on CDOT's Front Range priority List. This project is not included in , the current 5-yr. program; however, CDOT confirmed that it will be included in the next 5-yr. Program. This project may be joined to the underpass project for the pedestrian walkway. CDOT Elkhorn Avenue Overlay Project. This overlay project encompasses Elkhorn Ave. from the Hwy. 34/36 Intersection west to West Park Center. CDOT has verbally agreed to include "milling" which will prevent the roadway from having a drastic crown. Town staff will notify all business owners along Elkhorn Ave. of this 1996 project in order that they may save approximately $2-6,000 in asphalt costs for the replacement of their water and sewer service lines. Staff is aware of the Town's sensitivity to the tourist season, and will advise CDOT that the project cannot take place in mid-summer. CDOT Highway 7 Realignment. Mr. and Mrs. Robert Mann requested clarification on the Hwy. 7 realignment project relative to their residence on Pinewood Dr. in Carriage Hills. CDOT initially requested right-of-way from the Mann's; however, they have since relocated the new highway east approximately 20' and the right-of- r BRADFORD PUBLISHING COÂ· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee - January 26, 1995 - page 5 way is no longer required. The open space will be utilized and this use does not violate the Annexation Agreement. A new 8'-wide asphalt separated bikepath will be constructed. Due to funding, the project may conclude at Scott Ave. or Peak View. The Committee received an overview of the entire proj ect, beginning at the Holiday Inn. Each business will be limited to one access point; the curb, gutter and sidewalk will be constructed on both sides of the highway up Graves Ave. - the sidewalk is discontinued at this point and an 8' detached bikepath will begin and continue to Carriage Drive. At Graves Ave., the five lanes will be reduced to 3 which includes a turning lane. The proposed loss of trees at Pine Knoll Apartments, Morgan St., Lexington Lane and Community Drive has been minimized; however, some trees in the landscaping island at the Conference Center may be lost or transplanted. The Park Supply, Timberline Restaurant and other areas will receive improved access, curb and gutter and safety will be greatly improved. A 2'1 retaining wall will be constructed in the highway right-of-way at the Barleen Theater site, thus they will not loose any parking spaces. The access will also be improved at the Diamond Shamrock/bowling alley entrance. Parking in front of Village Square will be transformed from diagonal to parallel. The drawings are available in the Public Works Department, and staff urged all affected property owners to review them. The above information was determined by CDOT--staff's role is only that of reporting. The Committee commended Director Linnane for his work on this project. CDOT Highway 34 Realignment. This project begins at the east side of the Stanley Village driveway, east to Lakefront Street, approximately 5,000'. A 6' bikepath (staff is requesting consideration to 8'), is being planned along the south side, and curb and gutter is proposed along the stables frontage and along the south side of the highway from the Catholic Church to Lakefront St. The recent sidewalk installed at the Chamber of Commerce on the south side will be connected to a new bikepath. The Committee reviewed the monthly Customer Service Response and Water Reports. Staff was unable to verify whether the Augmentation Plan was filed by the Town Attorney, and will confirm this action as soon as possible. The community responded to the request to eliminate refuse from Christmas Trees for the tree chipping program, and 880 trees were processed. Due to the community's cooperation, this project will continue. The Chairman noted that a citizen suggested the community use live trees for Christmas and then plant them in lieu of chipping. There being no further business, staff requested an executive session to discuss property acquisition negotiations. Receiving consensus to enter Executive Session, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 10:51 A.M. 00.- Â». T. C ,- â‚¬ tu. .( 2 2-h" .4 4., Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk BRADFORDPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Board of Adjustment February 7, 1995 Board: Chairman Doylen, Members Dekker, Gillette, Newsom, and Sager Attending: Chairman Doylen, Members Gillette, Newsom, and Sager Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Building Official Allman, Town Attorney White, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: Member Dekker Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. HYDE PARK SUBDIVISION. 621 ASPEN AVENUE, LOT 5, BLOCK 2, KERRI AND TERRY TIERNEY/APPLICANTS -- REOUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE. Applicants are requesting a variance from the required 15-foot setback, Section 17.20.040,B, 1(a), to 6.74 feet from the street property line. Building Official Allman explained that the proposed addition faces Aspen Avenue and is a one-story structure. Terry Tierney, Applicant, stated that the proposed location is the best utilization of the property, considering present layout, topography, and the inability to build a second story because of the existing foundation. Three ponderosa pines and a significant downward slope exist on the north side property, and seven ponderosa pines, a chain link fence and a shed exist on the west side of the property. The northeast corner of the proposed addition would be 32 feet from the edge of the asphalt and the southeast corner would be 35 feet. Member concerns: no floor plan, no measurements noted on the submitted materials, north and west side of the property appears to be sufficient for an addition with no variance needed. Neighbors were contacted. Vernon Witt, 623 Aspen Avenue, objected to the variance stating traffic hazard and elimination of views. Chairman Sager moved the variance request be denied because the Applicant has not shown sufficient evidence that his property is exceptionally narrow, shallow, or steep to prevent the relocation of the proposed addition to an area that would not require a variance. There was no second to the motion. It was moved and seconded (Gillette-Newsom) the street setback variance be approved for 621 Aspen Avenue, contingent upon the addition limited to one story with a hip roof line, and citing the proposed construction preserves existing trees, and the slope to the north of the property is sufficient to allow the variance, and it passed. Members Doylen, Gillette, and Newsom voted yes. Member Sager voted no stating that, without exceptional circumstances, the ordinances should be upheld as written. OUASEBARTH SUBDIVISION, 911 DUNRAVEN, LOT BB, GRAPE APE AUTO CENTER, INC., TABATHA WAITE/APPLICANT. Applicant is seeking a variance from the following sections of the Municipal Code: Â· Section 17.20.060. The gross floor area of all floors in all buildings on the premises shall not exceed 25% of the lot area. â€¢ Section 17.20.040, B,1(b). Side yard setback is required to be 15 feet. Â· Section 10.16.010,B. No RV's or travel trailers shall be used as a store, office, or place for the carrying on of a business. Applicant is proposing to set a 10' x 40' portable office building along the west side of the existing building at 911 Dunraven BRADFOR/PUELISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Board of Adjustment, February 7, 1995 - Page 2 Street, zoned C-0. Building Official Allman reported that the proposed site for the office is presently used as a driveway and parking area, within 2 feet of the side property line. Applicant chose to pursue Board of Adjustment approval even though Director Stamey discouraged the Applicant to submit the request. Attorney White informed the Board of Adjustment and the Applicant that a variance to Section 10.16.010,B must be granted by the Town Board. CONCERNS Several concerns were discussed and resolved as follows: â€¢ All material relating to future Board of Adjustment meetings is to be distributed in a timely manner, preferably the Friday prior to the meeting. Â· Special Board of Adjustment meetings will be held when Applicant demonstrates a true hardship exists by being asked to await a regularly-scheduled meeting. Â· The application will include a set of instructions and a list of required materials to aid the Applicant in submitting a complete application. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Attorney Robert Meyer requested permission to speak regarding the variance request for 621 Aspen Avenue. Meyer was told the meeting started at 8:30 and was not-in attendance during discussion of the variance request for 621 Aspen Avenue. Meyer represents Vernon Witt, 623 Aspen Avenue, who objected to the variance stating possible traffic hazard, elimination of the view, reduction of property value, and the insufficient need to meet the variance criteria. Witt purchased the property knowing the codes and understood they would be upheld. Chairman Doylen reported the variance was allowed. Attorney White stated the Board of Adjustment is the final decision of the Town; the next step would be District Court. Meyer reported that steps will be taken within the law to overturn the variance. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 8:40 a.m. -Flo_ 14-Q-Q Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk BRADFORIPUBLISHI NICOl RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee February 7, 1995 Committee: Chairman Doylen, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: Chairman Doylen, Trustee Marshall Also Attending: Ass't. Town Administrator Widmer, Directors Stamey, Kilsdonk and Hinze, Advertising Manager Marsh, Sales and Marketing Director Pickering, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 10:00 A.M. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1994 Year-End Advertising Report. Manager Marsh reviewed the Mission Statement, Position Statements, Goals and Objectives and the following year-end statistics (as compared to 1993): Visitors Guide Requests ........ Increased 14.76% Total 800 Calls for Info. ..... " 25.54% The Top Ten States for Information Requests are: Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Colorado, Ohio, California, Iowa, Kansas and Indiana. 1 Based upon the 1993 Conversion Study, visitation resulting from the 1994 National Magazine Advertising Program were 22,940 vacationing families who spent an estimated $10,804,164; for an estimated sales tax revenue of $432,164; at a net media cost of $122,134; representing a return of $3.54 for every dollar spent in said Program. Efficiency in the National Magazine Program indicates a 1994 Media Cost/Inquiry of $2.49, $0.55 less that of 1993, which equates to an improvement of 18% (a shift in buys and the type of ads placed). Press Release Program: Return on Investment in 1993 was $4.53; the return in 1994 was $9.33. The First Quarter test of three "Open All Year" ads in the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News contributed to the following indications of off-season growth potential: RMNP visitation up 18.4%; In-State Wats Line calls up 49.0%; and Sales Tax Revenues up 15.2%. These ads resulted in the Town winning the 3CMA First Place Savvy Award for the second time in three years. Conference Center Report. Sales and Marketing Director Pickering introduced a new program whereby hotels/motels benefiting from the conference center will contribute toward conference marketing. Each benefiting hotel/motel will assess a $3.00/room night fee which will be collected by the Chamber of Commerce. The fee will help offset transportation service, pre-planning service, and marketing expenses. Staff held a meeting with affected accommodations and they are eager to get involved with marketing plans. Staff will report on a quarterly basis on this project. IF?/DFORIPUBLISHING.0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - February 7, 1995 - Page 2 MUSEUM: Staff and representatives from the Museum Advisory Board and Friends Board are meeting to develop a revised mission statement and goals for the Museum which are consistent with the Town's Strategic Plan. The Museum hosted a genealogy workshop in January, with 23 persons in attendance. Due to participant interest, the Museum is considering hosting a more comprehensive genealogy course. The Museum is participating in the Cultural Arts Council activity "Imagine This!", and the World War II Homefront Poster Exhibit is opening March 4. Work is proceeding on developing a panel of women who lived in the Estes Park area during the war. With funds ($1,885) donated by the Friends of the Museum, staff purchased a Canon copier. The Director will attend a board meeting February 11 of the Colorado-Wyoming Association of Museums in Cheyenne to present Estes Park as a site for the group's 1997 Annual Meeting. SPECIAL EVENTS: Staff presented standard agreements for the Rocky Mountain Miniature Horse Club for June 21-25, 1995 and the Colorado Arabian Horse Club for June 30-1 and July 2-4, 1995. The Committee recommends approval of both agreements. Parade Permits: The Rotary Club is requesting a permit for the Duck Fest Parade scheduled May 6, 1995. The parade route is from West Park Center east to the Chamber of Commerce and will begin at 10:00 A.M.. The Chamber of Commerce is requesting a permit for the Hippey Dippey Do Wop Parade scheduled June 3, 1995. The route is from Spruce Street east to the Transit Center and it will begin at 10:00 A.M. A question arose concerning insurance, and Assistant Administrator Widmer reported that staff is currently working on risk management issues as they relate to CIRSA. Therefore, the Committee recommends approval of both parade permits contingent upon staff's clarification with CIRSA. If clarification is confirmed in a timely manner, these two items will be included on the February 14 Town Board agenda. In celebration of Valentine's Weekend, Romance of the Rockies has scheduled carriage rides on February 11 and 12. Marianne Pool, event representative is requesting a variance from the formerly-approved route. The approved route is from the Transit Center, north on MacGregor, along the Bypass and west on Elkhorn, returning to the Transit Center--all of which contain right-hand-only turns. Representatives desire a stop at The Stanley Hotel for renewal of vows and a route that encompasses the Bypass, MacGregor Ave., and Devils Gulch, and involves left-hand turns. Pursuant to public safety concerns, Chief Racine is recommending approval of the standard (adopted) route rather than the alternate as proposed. Citing public safety concerns for potential conflicts of the horse and vehicles, based upon the impending date of this event, the Committee denied the alternate route. The Committee reviewed a Sales Tax Collection Policy for IRADFORD.U.LISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - February 7, 1995 - Page 3 special event functions. The policy was initiated to ensure sales tax funds are collected and remitted for all affected special event functions held inside Town limits. Proof of remittance will be considered prior to inclusion in the following year's event. The Committee recommends approval of the policy, authorizing staff to revise the policy at it relates to form names and numbers. Gary O'Connor, President/Rooftop Rodeo Committee, reported that Rodeo Week will begin with a Parade on July 12, and scheduled are: 6 Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association (PRCA) Rodeos with a total purse of $10,500, Western Heritage Days which includes "Calamity Jane and the Whole Shebang"--an act in the tradition of Will Rogers, the First Annual Festival of Indian Arts which includes the professional dance team Red Nations Dancers, the Wild Hearts Band from Loveland, Hayrides provided by MacGregor Ranch and Aspen Lodge, a Media Day on July 12, and a Long-Handled Mustache Contest. It is anticipated that all the events planned will be fun for all. The Committee is very appreciative of community support and they are hopeful that this new concept will attract more people to the facilities at Stanley Park. Reports. The EVRPD recently sponsored the Frost Giant Race with 230 participants where two previous records were broken. The Valentines Weekend celebration is scheduled February 11 . 4 and 12 and activities include a bed race, antique car rides, and renewal of vows. A Crop Walk for Hunger is scheduled February 12. The Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring Presidents Weekend February 18 and 19 which will include costumed-characters downtown. The International Dog Pull is scheduled this same weekend. The "Imagine This ! " event, sponsored by the School is scheduled February 18. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 11:06 A.M. 1Â·F L< 1 L.' x 0-100 (0 2.4.- it.Â» i Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk BRADFOROPUBLISHING CO, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee February 9, 1995 Committee: Chairman Dekker, Trustees Miller and Pauley Attending: Chairman Dekker, Trustees Miller and Pauley Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Light and Power Director Matzke, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Dekker called the meeting to order at 8:03 a.m. METER DEPARTMENT VEHICLE -- AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE The 1995 Light and Power Department budget includes $17,000 for replacement of a meter vehicle. The existing vehicle is a 1988 Jeep Wrangler with approximately 71,000 miles and an estimated resale value of $6,000+. Fleet Manager Shanafelt suggested transferring this vehicle to the Community Development Department to replace their 1984 Ford Bronco which was budgeted to have the engine replaced in 1995 at a cost of $2,400. Community Development would transfer the $2,400 budgeted for engine replacement plus the estimated resale value, $3,000 to $3,800, of the Ford Bronco to the Light and Power Department. Bids were received for the purchase of a new meter vehicle as follows: Foothills Chrysler $18,501.00 Rains Motor Company $18,673.26* Pro Jeep Eagle $20,405.21 Herbert Motors No Response * 2% local consideration of $373.47 would reduce the bid to $18,299.79. The Committee recommends approval of the purchase of the Jeep Wrangler from Rains Motor Company at a cost of $18,673.26, and the transfer of the existing vehicle to Community Development as described. ETS HEATER REBATE PROGRAM -- AUTHORIZATION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION In 1994, the Light and Power Committee approved a $4,000 rebate program for customers who installed electric thermal storage (ETS) heaters. During 1994, 27 customers received rebates totalling $3,531. The 1995 Light and Power energy efficiency budget includes $3,500 for rebate programs. Since January 1, 1995, four customers have installed 42.6 kW of ETS heat which would qualify for $639 in rebates. This program is reported along with the Department's other demand side management programs to the Department of Energy. Assistant Director Mangelsen reported these heaters are energy efficient, safe, and clean in comparison to other forms of heat, and reported few customer complaints. Chairman Dekker stated that customer satisfaction is directly related to Mangelsen's understanding of the program and his rapport with the customer. The Committee recommends extending the ETS Heater Rebate Program until the end of 1995 or until the $3,500 amount is exhausted. ANNUAL LIGHT & POWER BLASTING SERVICES -- REOUEST TO AWARD BID Bids on a "per hole" basis to provide blasting services for 1995, including labor and material for blasting and clean out of holes, are as follows: Kitchen and Company $450 Yenter Companies $350 BRADFORD PUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee, February 9, 1995 - Page 2 Town's cost to perform this work in-house averages $150 per hole. The Committee recommends rejecting both bids for annual blasting services and structuring future bids on a project basis rather than an annual basis. WINCH LINE BLOWER -- AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE The 1995 Light and Power budget includes $6,000 for the purchase of a winch line blower which will provide a one-step process of pulling underground power cable in a more efficient and safe manner. The present equipment will be retained for continued use. A Â·quote was received from WESCO, a sole source supplier, for a Condux winch line blower at a cost of $4,286 including missiles for 3", 4" and 6" DB-120 conduit. The Committee recommends approval of the purchase of the Condux winch line blower from WESCO at a cost of $4,286. REPORTS Director Matzke presented various graphs and end of year Financial Reports. project Updates: . The Longs Peak Recloser equipment has been installed with no further incidents of outages in the Allenspark area. The meter installation for the Upper Thompson emergency generator is complete. Pole installation in the Glen Haven area for U.S. West is continuing. Telephone Support for Outage Reporting: Construction Facilities Manager Sievers reported that the telephones have been programmed to connect the after-hours Light and Power emergency telephone number directly to Dispatch. Uncollectible Accounts: Director Matzke reported the write off for uncollectible accounts in 1994 was $6,700.30, compared to $1,981.57 in 1993, with an average write off of $3,500 over,recent years. The write off amount per revenue dollar was $0.00115 for 1994 and $0.00034 for 1993. The current deposit policy is credited for this continued low incidence of uncollectible accounts. There being no further business, Chairman Dekker adjourned the meeting at 8:50 a.m. -T~Lo- K .=AQ Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk Board of Trustees - January 24, 1995 - Page 4 B. Senior Citizen Center Update. Administrator Klaphake advised that Jim Dunlap/Senior Center Board Member conducted a survey to enhance the Center's vision and to plan for future facilities and services. While the results are unscientific, a 28.8% return was received. Survey results were identified for age groups, income groups, marital status, physical challenges, transportation, gender, volunteerism and member status. In summary, Mr. Dunlap stated that the Senior Center "is not meeting the needs of the senior population." The Board commended Mr. Dunlap for his effort on conducting the survey. Staff briefed the Trustees on operations: the Center is referred to as a "contracted meal site" which, with an Agreement with Larimer County, allows all Estes Park meal preparation to occur on site--meals are not prepared in Fort Collins and delivered to Estes Park. Congregate meal site statistics for 1989 confirm 7,400 meals on site and 3,900 home deliveries for a total of 11,400 meals. In 1993, 8,600 meals on site, 4,500 home deliveries for a total of 13,173 meals. Based upon Health Department discussions, the kitchen does not meet standards. This deficiency is strictly based upon equipment, not food preparation. Deficiencies include building use as it is not ADA accessible. The van formerly used for transportation must be handicapped accessible, insurance must be obtained and the driver must be licensed by P.U.C. With regard to governance, the Senior Center Board of Directors is elected by the membership. If the board members were formally appointed by the Mayor, the members could be included in the Town's liability insurance. Senior Center board members have paid $800 for the liability insurance coverage. The Town owns the building and leases it to the Senior Center; the Center manages operations. Copies of all agreements and associated documents Will be made available and become part of the official records of the Town. Discussion followed, with the Town Board supporting the 1 A. obtain a local commitment 50/50 match for funding of the following: (1) staff initiate the pre-grant process to I. //52 building rehabilitation; (2) staff, with input from the Center, prepare an estimate on design and remodeling â‚¬9 costs for the 1996 Budget; (3) there be no change in governance and transportation; and (4) all future contracts be executed by the Mayor. Administrator Klaphake advised that he held a meeting with Larimer County and Senior Center representatives, and all are in agreement with the four items mentioned above. C. 08*.elorado funds are now available for open sna-; parks>trails and outdoor recreation areas, ant>- grant applicationâ€¢â€¢429dline' is February 10. Stairrequested authorization -Eb-~nit the following-pel@cts for grant approval: (1) na...WA-appribef restrooms at the fairgrounds, approximateI7~Sd7000 ; and (2) finish the remaining 600' of the I*e@St47~hke.421Â·ke Trail from the Lake Estes Marina tp,1â‚¬ghway 34 signagi......Undscaping, approximately 3287600. Sufficient funds are -rM-4,4L1995 Budget for-~tne 2/1 matching grants. It was moved-**0 seconded (Miller/Pauley) the request approved, and it passed unanimously. ./.0/0/0 PUSLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Works Committee January 26, 1995 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Doylen and Miller Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Public Works Director Linnane, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:02 A.M. ESTES VALLEY RECREATION DISTRICT (EVRPD} GOLF COURSE MANAGEMENT alA. AGREEMENT -RENEWAL. pursuant to the 18-hole golf course remodeling project in 1990 ,+,where the Town formed the Building Authority and issued bonds /Â¢:sr C cops), the EVRPD and Town executed a 5-yr. Management Agreement /- ' 12.~ for said golf course. Notice of renewal was due June 1, 1994 and ,37 District Chairman Repola advised that due to an oversight by the EVRPD, notice of renewal was not issued until November 29, 1994. The District is seeking an additional 5-yr. renewal period. paragraph 15 of the Agreement states that "This Agreement shall automatically renew for additional one-year periods following either the end of the first five-year term, or the second five-year term, whichever is applicable, unless this Agreement is terminated by either party..." Chairman Repola stated that this property is extremely important; payments from the golf course improvement fund are making the bond payments; and the 5-yr. term assists in the District's planning and projects. In addition, the District is reviewing a multi-year commitment for new golf carts and they would like a 5-yr. renewal due to financing of these carts. Based upon Paragraph 15, the Committee believes the Agreement has automatically been renewed for one year to January 15, 1996, and no further action is necessary at this time. Chairman Gillette confirmed that the Agreement is binding and serves both agencies well, the Town is pleased with the District's management, and that this discussion is not to be perceived as the Town intends to seize operations of the golf course. When the District submits their renewal notice (prior to June 1, 1996), items of discussion will include a 5-yr. renewal option, and the financing for the new golf carts. Staff reported that a written memorandum addressing the automatic renewal language contained in Paragraph 15 will be obtained from the Town Attorney. qÂ£23 CUT STANDARDS - REOUEST AUTHORIZATION TO UPDATE. Public WoF~ZD-ai~2Etor Linnane advised that staff has coflf,i,pa~â€¢ehat the Town' s streer-mudi~tandards are very leniqg~.~-0-mompared to CDoT and County standaral*wbj.ch is affecti,ie-efre- integrity of the roadways (i.e. settlement and--b~~,D~~00--The street cuts require increasing amounts of maintellppe-Nimâ€¢â€¢Ggplts in less than smooth surfaces. Director Linnlpe~Feviewed Man-V,4&ievers ' memorandum identifying an 18-JWC- list of potential r-Bâ€¢,6~.42, and of particular note w-re: 1.-0-eboT requires a 50' overlay on either side of the trenc~, .00- the full width of the street. RECEIVED. HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE FEB 03 1995 Lynn A. Hammond 200 East Seventh Street ADMIN. DEPT Alfred P. Davis Roger E. Clark Suite 418 Gregory A. White Loveland, Colorado 80537 Of Counsel 303-667-1023 TELEFAX 303-669-9380 January 31, 1995 Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Board Members: You have requested that I give an opinion concerning the failure of the Estes valley Recreation and Park District to give timely notice of renewal of the Operating Agreement dated November 15, 1990 between the Estes Valley Recreation and Park District and the Town of Estes Park. I have reviewed the Operating Agreement and the letter dated November 29, 1994 addressed to Gary Klaphake from Stanley C. Gengler, Executive Director of the Recreation District. Also, I have reviewed the Ground Lease dated November 15, 1990 between the Town as landlord and the Estes Park Building Authority as tenant and the Golf Course Lease Agreement dated November 15, 1990 between the Estes Park Building Authority as lessor and the Town as lessee. Paragraph 15 of the Operating Agreement provides that the Recreation District, at its option, may renew the Operating Agreement for an additional five year period by giving the Town notice on or before June 1, 1994. Said notice was not received by the Town. On November 30, 1994, the Town did receive the aforementioned letter concerning renewal of the Operating Agreement. Paragraph 15 further states that the Operating Agreement shall automatically renew for additional one year periods if the Recreation District does not execute its option to renew for an additional five year period. Paragraph 16 of the Agreement further provides that either party may terminate the Operating Agreement upon giving written notice to the other patty at least 180 days prior to the automatic renewal date which is January 15th of each year. Said termination may be either at the end of any applicable five year period or any applicable one year period. Page 2 The Town has the following options: A. Accept the late notice of renewal as outlined in the November 29, 1994 letter from the Recreation District and waive the failure of the Recreation District to timely renew the Operating Agreement. In that event the Operating Agreement would be extended for an additional five year period beginning January 15, 1995. B. Do not waive the failure of the Recreation District to give timely notice of renewal for an additional five year term. In this event, the Operating Agreement would automatically renew for an additional one year period effective as of January 15, 1995. In the event the Board of Trustees selects either option above, it is my opinion that the Recreation District be given immediate notice in writing of that decision. If you need anything further, please give me a call. ~ery truly yours, -; a L__ u Gregory A. White GAW:jc 3 a. 6- HAMMOND, CLARK AND WHITE Lynn A. Hammond 200 East Seventh Street Roger E. Clark Suite 418 Alfred P. Davis Gregory A. White Loveland, Colorado 80537 Of Counsel 303-667-1023 TELEFAX 303-669-9380 February 13, 1995 Rich Widmer Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Rich: Enclosed is the reimbursement resolution for Park Entrance Estates Special Improvement District. In talking with Diane Barrett, Bond Counsel, she stated that the amount of $750,000.00 is the maximum amount and cannot be adjusted upward if, in fact, the cost is above that amount. Also, the type of fund to which the money is to be reimbursed is also mandatory. If you feel that the $750,000.00 needs to be increased, I can increase it on the resolution to be presented to the Board. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. ' l ~fery truly yours, 0 0 ~ Grlgory A. White GAW:jc Enclosure : RESOLUTION ' WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park (the 11 Town ") intends to ~ present to certain electors questions regarding the creation of a special improvement district pursuant to Title 31, Article 25, Part 5, Colorado Revised Statutes, and the issuance Of special assessment bonds, in order to provide certain infrastructure improvements within the Park Entrance Estates Subdivision which will be of special benefit to properties therein; and WHEREAS, if the voters approve the creation of such special improvement district and the issuance of bonds, the Town intends to issue tax-exempt special assessment bonds in a maximum principal amount of $750,000.00 to finance such infrastructure improvements which are expected to include, but not be limited to, street and road improvements, including right-of-way acquisition, storm and drainage improvements and water system improvements; and WHEREAS, the authorization and issuance of such bonds will be accomplished as soon as is practicable; and WHEREAS, it is possible that the Town will need to make certain expenditures from its general fund in connection with the construction of such infrastructure improvements prior to the issuance of such special assessment bonds; and WHEREAS, in such event, it is the intent of the Town to - reimburse its general fund for such expenditures from the proceeds _ of such bonds when they are issued. NOW THEREFORE, the Town resolves as follows: 1. The Town hereby declares its intent to reimburse its general fund from the proceeds of an issue of tax-exempt special assessment bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $750,000.00, when issued, for any expenditures it may make toward the construction of infrastructure improvements of special benefit to properties located within the Park Entrance Estates Subdivision prior to its issuance of such tax exempt bonds. 2. This resolution of intent is made by the Town in compliance with United States Treasury Regulati6n Section 1.150-2. 3. This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO Mayor aRADFOROPUSLISHINGCOÂ· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS public Works Committee - January 26, 1995 - Page 3 i~b.2 park, the Post Office gave her the option of _inrng- a privabÂ«~~ral box--a service for which she must -prr DiscussioCh.Uowed, with Chairman Gil Eenoting that the Postal Service and TOWÂ».*st work tog*ber- for the needs and desires of all citizens. The CommiUS,9--recommends the Postal service submit a revised proposal, inJ,rfEb~...for downtown mail delivery, taking into consideratioKe Town -cona22.i~ich include, but are not limited to,dper to door delivery for bulmwqfes without negatively impact,iDG-rental fees for the boxes. The co2rb*,42_ thanked Postal service representatives for their report. PARK ENTRANCE ESTATES - DISCUSSION ON SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND REOUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR ROADWAY AND WATER LINE DESIGN. 1-JIA Park Entrance Estates was annexed in 1994. The Annexation -' ' 2.9 Agreement specified that the Town would assist in the formation of \ / a Special Improvement District (S.I.D.) for roadway improvement (asphalt, drainage facilities, etc.) for Blocks 1 and 2, and water main improvements for Block 2. Formation of the S.I.D. requires voter approval, and assuming the District if formed, an election would be held in November, 1995. Staff advised that the affected homeowners were aware of the cost estimates prior to annexation. The Committee reviewed the scope of services which includes preliminary engineering, final design and construction management engineering and time schedule. Cost estimates for four scenarios are being included in the RFP to determine the best alternative: roadway and water main for Blocks 1 and 2; roadway only for Blocks 1 and 2; roadway for Blocks 1 and 2 and water main for Block 2; and water main installation for Blocks 1 and 2 after roadway construction. Bid results are as follows: Van Horn Engineering ..................0 $25,570 Estes Park Surveyors ................... 33,200 Rocky Mountain Consultants ............. 50,260 The specifications were vague with respect to the construction management which has been clarified with all three engineering firms--all are satisfied with the bidding process. Therefore, approximately $7,200 (250 hours) will be added to Van Horn's bid (low bidder) for a total bid of $32,770. (Identical hours were added to Estes Park Surveyors' bid, and Van Horn remained the low bidder.) Discussion followed, with the Committee recommending the adjusted low bid not-to-exceed $32,770 submitted by Van Horn Engineering be accepted. VEHICLE PURCHASE - REOUEST APPROVAL. ~ '~1,9 The 1995 Budget includes $80,000 for a new snowplow and dump truck. 70'030 Staff requested authorization to proceed utilizing the State -ti/; Bid/Sole Source Bid process where Rocky Mountain International (cab and chassis) Trucks and MacDonald Equipment (plow/dump truck components) would provide the vehicle for $81,423.00. A $600 rebate is being offered by MacDonald Equipment to display the truck at the Estes Park Snow and Ice Conference, reducing the cost to $80,823. The truck is over-budget by $823, however, certain line- item accounts could be adjusted to cover the deficit. The life expectancy of the new truck is approximately 10 years. The committee recommends staff be authorized to purchase the vehicle as defined above for $80,823, suggesting staff attempt to raise the $600 display price. ./.0/0/0 PUILISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS community Development Committee - February 7, 1995 - Page 2 MUSEUM: Staff and representatives from the Museum Advisory Board and Friends Board are meeting to develop a revised mission statement and goals for the Museum which are consistent with the Town's Strategic Plan. The Museum hosted a genealogy workshop in January, with 23 persons in attendance. Due to participant interest, the Museum is considering hosting a more comprehensive genealogy course. The Museum is participating in the Cultural Arts Council activity "Imagine This!", and the World War II Homefront Poster Exhibit is opening March 4. Work is proceeding on developing a panel of women who lived in the Estes Park area during the war. With funds ($1,885) donated by the Friends of the Museum, staff purchased a Canon copier. The Director will attend a board meeting February 11 of the Colorado-Wyoming Association of Museums in Cheyenne to present Estes Park as a site for the group's 1997 Annual Meeting. SPECIAL EVENTS: d.A. g>-Â£ Miniature Horse Club for June 21-25, 1995 and the Colorado ,+51 Staff presented standard agreements for the Rocky Mountain 7-1 Arabian Horse Club for June 30-1 and July 2-4, 1995. The Committee recommends approval of both agreements. rade Permits: The Rotary Club is requesting a permit f r t Duck Fest Parade scheduled May 6, 1995. The parade r e is m West Park Center east to the Chamber of Commerc and Will in at 10:00 A.M. The Chambe of Commerce is requesting a permit for e Hippey Dippey Do W Parade scheduled June 3, 1995. e route is from Spruce S eet east to the Transit Cent and it will begin at 10:00 . A question arose conce ing insurance, and Assistant Adm istrator Widmer repor d that staff is currently working on isk management issu as they relate to CIRSA. Therefore, th ommittee reco ds approval of both parade permits conting t upon staf s clarification with CIRSA. If clarification 's confi d in a timely manner, these two items will be incl ed o he February 14 Town Board agenda. In celebration of Valentine's ee nd, Romance of the Rockies has scheduled carriage ride on Fe uary 11 and 12. Marianne Pool, event representativ is reque 'ng a variance from the formerly-approved route The appro d route is from the Transit Center, north MacGregor, alo the Bypass and west on Elkhorn, returni to the Transit ter--all of which contain right-hand nly turns. Representa 'ves desire a stop at The Stanley el for renewal of vows nd a route that encompasses th ypass, MacGregor Ave., and vils Gulch, and involves left and turns. Pursuant to public s ety concerns, Chief Raci is recommending approval of he standard (adopted) ute rather than the alternate as prop ed. Citing public ety concerns for potential conflicts o the horse and ve cles, based upon the impending date of this nt, the comm' ee denied the alternate route. T Committee reviewed a Sales Tax Collection Policy or AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this /90* day of ~0Lt,Lato,j~ , W 1993-, hv and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, A Municipal Corporation, as party of the first part, and 4ck~ 92% 11,4*ZEu<. >41tdâ‚¬ t?AAjas party of the second part, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the second party desires to hold a horse show or shows at Estes Park Fairgrounds at Stanley Park, (hereinafter referred to as Stanley Park), Estes Park, Colorado, on the hereinafter set forth dates, and to make contractual agreements for the use of the facilities at Stanley Park and services to be furnished by first party in connection with the use of said facilities. NOW IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The second party shall hold horse shows or halter classes on the following date or dates: Date: (1~ a 1 7 Â»AU 21 *vA-e- =25.- 0 2. First party agrees to furnish to second party all available stalls and exhibition space for animals at Stanley Park as herein provided. First party will not furnish anv feed or straw for any of the animals and no cleaning of the stalls except as herein provided. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this dZ)TH day of Â£2*2977,236Â¢ 199~ , bv and between the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, A Municipal Corporation, as party Of the first part, and A It LoaDR.Abe. MR/18 1,44 %42 4649 , as party of the second part, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the second party desires to hold a horse show or shows at Estes Park Fairgrounds at Stanley Park, (hereinafter referred to as Stanley Park), Estes Park, Colorado, on the hereinafter set forth dates, and to make contractual agreements for the use of the facilities at Stanley Park and services to be furnished by first party in connection with the use of said facilities. NOW IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The second party shall hold horse shows or halter classes on the following date or dates: A 9 /1 Date: Jo,Ai E 36 Â·~ Joi-9 1, i995- Nirk,4 i.Â£04=saa Jo Lit; 2 - 4 j 99S-- ~AFE)Rt)'1.4,12-t djsses 2. First party agrees to furnish to second party all available stalls and exhibition space for animals at Stanley Park as herein provided. First party will not furnish any feed or straw for any of the animals and no cleaning of the stalls except as herein provided. e RAOFORO PUBLISHING CO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Community Development Committee - February 7, 1995 - Page 2 MUSEUM: Staff and representatives from the Museum Advisory Board and Friends Board are meeting to develop a revised mission statement and goals for the Museum which are consistent with the Town's Strategic Plan. The Museum hosted a genealogy workshop in January, with 23 persons in attendance. Due to participant interest, the Museum is considering hosting a more comprehensive genealogy course. The Museum is participating in the Cultural Arts Council activity "Imagine This!", and the World War II Homefront poster Exhibit is opening March 4. Work is proceeding on developing a panel of women who lived in the Estes Park area during the war. With funds ($1,885) donated by the Friends of the Museum, staff purchased a Canon copier. The Director will attend a board meeting February 11 of the Colorado-Wyoming Association of Museums in Cheyenne to present Estes Park as a site for the group's 1997 Annual Meeting. SPECIAL EVENTS: S*14-P=--ented standard agreements for the Rocky Mountain Miniature Horsi-ehb.faL.-222~ 21-25, 1995 _and..flia*Getertfdo Arabian Horse Club for_2une~90-G:*Uat~~Elly 2-4, 1995. The Cemaikkae-eecomMEE5Eapproval of both atiFEBment.a.,~ Parade Permits: The Rotary Club is requesting a permit for 3.6/ is from West Park Center east to the chamber of Commerce and the Duck Fest Parade scheduled May 6, 1995. The parade route will begin at 10:00 A.M. ~,-.4 The Chamber of Commerce is requesting a permit for the Hippey Dippey Do Wop Parade scheduled June 3, 1995. The route is from Spruce Street east to the Transit Center and it will Â·f.L begin at 10:00 A.M. A question arose concerning insurance, and Assistant Administrator Widmer reported that staff is currently working on risk management issues as they relate to CIRSA. Therefore, the Committee recommends approval of both parade permits contingent upon staff's clarification with CIRSA. If clarification is confirmed in a timely manner, these two items will be included on the February 14 Town Board agenda. I celebration of Valentine's Weekend, Romance of the Roc ' s ha heduled carriage rides on February 11 and 12. anne Pool, nt representative is requesting a varia from the formerly- oved route. The approved ro is from the Transit Cente , orth on MacGregor, alon e Bypass and west on Elkhorn, retu ' g to the Transi enter--all of which contain right-hand-on turns. Re sentatives desire a stop at The Stanley Hotel fo ene of vows : and a route that encompasses the Bypass, Mac or Ave., and Devils Gulch, and involves left-hand turns ursu to public safety concerns, Chief Racine is r mmending a oval Of the standard (adopted) route r er than the altern as proposed. Citing public safety cerns for potential co icts of the horse and vehicle ased upon the impending date this event, the Committe enied the alternate route. Th ommittee reviewed a Sales Tax Collection Po 'cy for RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ./.0/0/0/U/LIS'ING CO 3.B. The Committee reviewed a Sales Tax Collection Policy for special event functions. The policy was initiated to ensure ,/12 sales tax funds are collected and remitted for all affected special event functions held inside Town limits. Proof of remittance will be considered prior to inclusion in the following year's event. The Committee recommends approval of a the Policy, authorizing staff to revise the policy at it relates to form names and numbers. ry O'Connor, President/Rooftop Rodeo Committee, reporte t t Rodeo Week will begin with a Parade on July 12, d sch uled are: 6 Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association CA) Rodeo with a total purse of $10,500, Western Herita Days which i ludes "Calamity Jane and the Whole Sheban --an act in the tr ition of Will Rogers, the First Annual estival of Indian Arts hich includes the professional d ce team Red Nations Dance the Wild Hearts Band from Lo land, Hayrides provided by Mac gor Ranch and Aspen Lod , a Media Day on July 12, and a ong-Handled Mustache Contest. It is anticipated that all he events planne will be fun for all. The Committee is very preciative o community support and they are hopeful that is new cept will attract more people to the facilities a Stan Park. Reports. The EVRPD recently onsored the Frost Giant Race with 230 participants where wo evious records were broken. The Valentines Weekend elebration 's scheduled February 11 and 12 and activities nclude a bed e, antique car rides, and renewal of vows A Crop Walk for unger is scheduled Februa 12. The Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring Pres ents Weekend February and 19 which will include costum -characters downtow The International Dog Pull is schedule this same weeke . The "Imagine This!" event, sponsored by School is eduled February 18. The being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned t m ting at 11:06 A.M. Al 1 e c .<. c-,C<.0 d / C 1,61 1< ..,G, " Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk 9 2/14/95 TOWN OF ESTES PARK SALES TAX COLLECTION POLICY SPECIAL EVENT FUNCTIONS The Town of Estes Park requires the following procedures be met by all special event organizers to ensure the collection and remittance of all sales tax for all affected special event functions held inside Estes Park city limits: 1. Obtain a Business License for the event from the Town Clerk's Office - $200.00/year fee. 2. Every organizer is to furnish each event vendor with the following: â€¢ Applicable Sales Tax Chart. â€¢ Instructions that all sales tax collections must be paid directly to the Colorado Department Of Revenue. Proof of the remittance to be given to the event organizer prior to being considered for inclusion in the following year's event or any additional event. Verification will be confirmed by the Special Events Department. â€¢ Sales Tax Special Event Application and Trade Name Registration Form #DR 0589 to be completed even if the vendor or sales person has a Colorado Sales Tax License, and Colorado Department of Revenue Special Event Retail Sales Tax Form #DR0098 for vendors or sales persons without a Colorado Business License (Sales Tax Remittance Form). 3. Provide a list of all vendors which includes their name, business name, mailing address and Colorado Business License (Sales Tax License) (if available) to the Special Events Department within 30 days following the event. Organizer: Sample copies of all forms described above are attached and available from the Special Events Department, 303-586-6104. BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee February 9, 1995 Committee: Chairman Dekker, Trustees Miller and Pauley Attending: Chairman Dekker, Trustees Miller and Pauley Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Light and Power Director Matzke, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None chairman Dekker called the meeting to order at 8:03 a.m. 4.A. METER DEPARTMENT VEHICLE -- AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE The 1995 Light and Power Department budget includes $17,000 for replacement of a meter vehicle. The existing vehicle is a 1988 Jeep Wrangler with approximately 71,000 miles and an estimated resale value of $6,000+. Fleet Manager Shanafelt suggested ff~~ transferring this vehicle to the Community Development Department to replace their 1984 Ford Bronco which was budgeted to have the ** engine replaced in 1995 at a cost of $2,400. Community Development would transfer the $2,400 budgeted for engine replacement plus the estimated resale value, $3,000 to $3,800, of the Ford Bronco to the Light and Power Department. Bids were received for the purchase of a new meter vehicle as follows: Foothills Chrysler $18,501.00 Rains Motor Company $18,673.26* Pro Jeep Eagle $20,405.21 Herbert Motors No Response * 2% local consideration of $373.47 would reduce the bid to $18,299.79. The Committee recommends approval of the purchase of the Jeep Wrangler from Rains Motor Company at a cost of $18,673.26, and the transfer of the existing vehicle to Community Development as described. E HEATER REBATE PROGRAM -- AUTHORIZATION FOR ONE YEAR EXTENSION In 19 the Light and Power Committee approved a $4,000 reb e program f customers who installed electric thermal storag TS) heaters. D *g 1994, 27 customers received rebates alling $3,531. The 199 'ght and Power energy efficiency bu t includes $3,500 for rebate p ams. Since January 1, 1995 our customers have installed 42.6 kW ETS heat which would lify for $639 in rebates. This program i eported along h the Department's other demand side management rams to e Department of Energy. Assistant Director Mangelsen re t these heaters are energy efficient, safe, and clean in com 'son to other forms of heat, and reported few customer compl ' ts. airman Dekker stated that customer satisfaction is irectly ated to Mangelsen's understanding of the pro m and his rappo with the customer. The Committee recommen extending the ETS He r Rebate Program until the end of 199 or until the $3,500 amount exhausted. ANNUAL LIGHT & WER BLASTING SERVICES -- REOUEST TO RD BID Bids on per hole" basis to provide blasting services fo 1995, includ labor and material for blasting and clean out of h s, are follows: Kitchen and Company $450 Yenter Companies $350 â€¢â€¢.0,0.0 PU.W..,...0. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission, September 20, 1994 - page 2 ,1-~.-Rgplat of Lot 131. Al Fresco Place. Northeast_Corner of C.A. .- Chiauita Lane and Chapin Lane. John Grace/Applicant. Applicant's representative Paul Kochevar explained Applicant wishes to divide the existing lot of 2.2 acres into two lots of 1.17 and 1.03 acres. Applicant is requesting an exception -/0 to the minimum lot size requirement of 60,000 sq. ft. for Lot 131-A and 74,000 sq. ft. for Lot 131-B. The newly created 4~-~~ lots would be typical of the average neighborhood lot size. A single family residence exists on Lot 131-A, with proposed construction of a new single family residence on Lot 131-B. Lot 131-B is buffered from surrounding homes by mature trees and a large rock outcropping which is located east of the existing frame house. Access to Lot 131-B off MacGregor Avenue at the southeast corner is possible but would require relocation of a power line guy pole. Staff requests a separate drawing be provided showing the proposed access driveway contours. Commissioners concerns included public requests for controlled development, public concern about : allowing continued lot splitting, and area housing needs. It was moved and seconded (Brown-Cooper) Replat of Lot 131, Al Fresco Place be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, with the findings that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property, that the exception is necessary for the preservation and the enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. that the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood in which the property of the petitioner is situated or in conflict with the purposes and objectives of this title, and contingent upon the following conditions, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes": Brown, Cooper, Pohl, Sager. Those voting "Noâ€¢': Burgess, Thomas: 1. Relocation of the power line guy pole at developer expense. 2. Drawing of driveway access/design be provided to Staff and that driveway design incorporate erosion control. 3. Verification of location of utility services, necessary easements, and service ability. Imm..w.*COâ€¢ - Planning Commission December 20, 1994 . Commissioners: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, John Gilfillan, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Brown, Burgess, Gilfillan, Hix, Pohl, Thomas Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Chairman Sager introduced and welcomed newly-appointed Planning commissioner John Gilfillan. 1. MINUTES. Minutes of the November 15, 1994 meeting were approved as submitted. 2-h. Amended Plat. Lot 10. Block 2. Park Entrance Estates. and a Portion of S.W. 1/4. Section 26-5-73. and Adiacent Metes & Bounds -.O. parcel. Ted Chittwood/Apolicant. Applicant's representative Paul Kochevar explained the Applicant is proposing to combine two lots into one lot, totaling 1.527 acres, zoned E-Estate. The existing /<P land use is a single family dwelling. It was moved and seconded (Brown-Burgess) the Amended Plat, Lot 10, Block 2, Park Entrance Estates and a portion of S.W. 1/4, Section 26-5-73, be 'avorably T* recommended to the Town Board, contingent upon the follcwing, and it passed unanimously: 1. Correct title block to include adjacent lot and lot number. 2. Show existing improvements. 3. Place the following notes on the plat: Â· Water service is not available above 7,975 feet. Â· Approval from the owner of the private line is required to tap into this line. . BRADFOR[ PUBLISHING Co. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - January 17, 1995 - Page 2 ANNEXATIONS. 4.0. 5.h, Grev FOX Annexation and Zoning. First and Second Additions. Dick and Ann Barlow/Applicant. Chairman Sager opened the public hearing. This proposal consists of the annexation of two contiguous parcels, totalling 51.84 acres. The plan is to annex the property to the Town of Estes / Park through two sequential annexations to meet the contiguous boundary requirement and apply to the Town for E-Estate A 4 zoning. Applicant's Representative Bill van Horn noted that the Applicant is proposing a large-lot single-family development; zoning is currently E-Estate in the County, the owner is requesting E-Estate Town zoning; and all municipal services can be extended to this property. Concern was expressed with the proposed single connection route from Larkspur--the Commission is on record that such single connections are unacceptable. In addition, CDOT should be approached prior to consideration by the Planning Commission. Mr. Van Horn stated that there are physical limitations to obtain a secondary connection, and the owner has met with CDOT although an application has not yet been filed, and Town support was requested. Based upon density and road connection concerns, Commissioner Brown urged the Applicant to sequentially file all future additions. Additional discussion followed: probability of an Annexation Agreement for the balance of the property, requiring a petition to be filed for the remaining property within 60-90 days; the Third and Fourth Additions will also be sequential; and a 2%-acre tract will not be annexed. There were no comments from the audience. The Commission questioned whether the Applicant would accept an Annexation Agreement relative to road connections, and staff advised that such concerns should be addressed during preliminary plat consideration. There being no further testimony, Chairman Sager closed the public hearing. Therefore, finding that it is in the Town' s best interest to annex the site, it was moved and seconded (A. Hix/Burgess) Grey Fox Annexation, First and Second Additions, including E-Estate zoning, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, and it passed by the following votes: Those voting "Yes" Commissioners Burgess, A. Hix, Pohl and Sager. Those voting "No" Commissioner Brown. RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-110, C.R.S., hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the following described area that the requirements of the applicable parts of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., have been met; that an election is not required under Section 31-12-107 (2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the annexation. The area eligible for annexation as the "GREY FOX FIRST ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park is as follows: Property located in Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as beginning at the North 1/16 corner of said Section 1, thence N 89Â°48'12" E a distance of 1318.48 feet; thence S 00Â°27'27" E a distance of 1074.65 feet; thence S89Â°32'33" W a distance of 408.47 feet; thence N 34Â°07'42" W a distance of 69.81 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left 63.97 feet, Radius = 70.00 feet;, Delta = 52Â°21'24", Chord Bearing = S 88Â°57'13" W 61.76 feet; thence S 62Â°46'31" W a distance of 112.80 feet; thence along a curve to the right 173.19 feet, Radiu s = 130.00 feet, Delta = 76Â°19'49", Chord Bearing = N 79Â°03'34" W 160.66 feet; thence N 40Â°53'40" W a distance of 188.55 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right 110.49 feet, Radius = 50.00 feet, Delta = 126Â°36'48" , Chord Bearing = N 30Â°43'04" W 89.34 feet; thence N 36Â°55'26" W a distance of 199.07 feet; thence S67Â°42'22" W a distance of 259.93 feet; thence N 01Â°01'00" W a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 28.64 acres, more or less. DATED this day of , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk â‚¬ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS GREY FOX FIRST ADDITION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a Petiticn for Annexation, together with four (4) copies of the plat of said area as required by law, was filed with the Board of Trustees on the 13th day December, 1994, by the landowners of one hundred percent (100%) of the area and owning one hundred percent (100%) of the area, excluding public streets and alleys, of the area hereinafter described. The Board, by Resolution at its regular meeting on the 13th day of December, 1994, accepted said Petition and found and determined that the provisions of Section 31-12-107 (1) (g), C.R.S., were met; and the Board further determined that a public hearing should be held oh January 24, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Munici- pal Building for the purposes of determining that the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., and it considered eligible for annexation. Section 1. That the Notice of said hearing was given and published as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S., Section 3. That the hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-12-109, C.R.S., on the 24th day of January, 1995. Section 4. That following said hearing: the Board of Trustees adopted a Resolution determining that the proposed annexation met the requirements of the applicable parts of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S.; that an election was not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no addi- tional terms or conditions are to be imposed upon said annexation. Section 5. That the annexation of the following described area designated as GREY FOX FIRST ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park, is hereby approved: Property located in Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as beginning at the North 1/16 corner of said Section 1, thence N 89Â°48'12" E a distance of 1318.48 feet; thence S 00Â°27'27" E a distance of 1074.65 feet; thence S89Â°32'33" W a distance of 408.47 feet; thence N 34Â°07'42" W a distance . of 69.81 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left 63.97 feet, Radius = 70.00 feet;, Delta = 52Â°21'24", Chord Bearing = S 88Â°57'13" W 61.76 feet; thence S 62Â°46'31" W a distance of 112.80 feet; thence along a curve to the right 173.19 feet, Radius = 130.00 feet, Delta = 76Â°19'49", Chord Bearing = N 79Â°03'34" W 160.66 feet; thence N 40Â°53'40" W a distance of 188.55 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right 110.49 feet, Radius = 50.00 feet, Delta = 126Â°36'48", Chord Rearing = N 30Â°43'04" W 89.34 feet; thence N 36Â°55'26" Wa distance of 199.07 feet; thence S67Â°42'22" W a dis- tance 6f 259.93 feet; thence N 01Â°01'00" W a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 28.64 acres, more or less. Section 6. The Town of Estes Park, Colorado, hereby con- rents, pursuant to Section 37-45-126 (3.6) C.R.S., to the inclusion of lands described above into the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Coloradc Water Conservancy District. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its option and publication. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 24th day of January, 1995 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of January, 1995, all as required by the statutes of the State of Colorado. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING GREY FOX FIRST ADDITION AND GREY FOX SECOND ADDITION TO E-ESTATE ZONING TO TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WHEREAS, the annexation of Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition was accomplished on the day of , 1995; and WHEREAS, following testimony, the Board of Trustees have determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to zone Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition to the Town of Estes Park as E-Estate. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. Section 1. Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition shall be zoned as E-Estate. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , TOWN OF ESTES PARK, Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1995 and published in a newspaper of general circu- lation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of , 1995. RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, CCLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-110, C.R.S., hereby finds that with regard to the proposed annexation of the following described area that the requirements of the applicable parts of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., have been met; that an election is not required under Section 31-12-107 (2), C.R.S.; and that no additional terms and conditions are to be imposed on the annexation. The area eligible for annexation as the "GREY FOX SECOND ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park is as follows: Property located in Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as commencing at the North 1/16 corner of said Section 1, thence S 01Â°01'00" E a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence N 67Â°42'22" E a distance of 259.93 feet; thence S 36Â°55'26" E a distance of 199.07 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left 110.49 feet, Radius = 50.00 feet, Delta = 126Â°36'48", Chord Bearing = S 30Â°43'04" E 89.34 feet; thence S 40Â°53'40" E a distance Of 188.55 feet; thence along a curve to the left 173.19 feet, Radius = 130.00 feet, Delta = 76Â°19'49", Chord Bearing = S79Â°03'34" E 160.66 feet; thence N 62Â°46:31" E a distance of 112.80 feet; thence along a curve to the right 63.97 feet, Radius = 70.00 feet, Delta = 52Â°21'24", Chord Bearing = N 88Â°57'13" E 61.76 feet; thence S 34Â°07'42" E a distance of 69.81 feet; thence N 89Â°32'33" E a distance of 408.47 feet; thence S 00Â°27'27" E a distance of 320.00 feet; thence S .J 00Â°27'42" W a distance of 328.67 feet; thence S 89Â°49'19" W a distance of 1306.95 feet; thence N 00Â°50'15" E a distance of 326.54 feet; thence N 01Â°01'00" W a distance Of 646.51 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 23.20 acres, more or less. DATED this day of , 1995. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, TO BE KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS GREY FOX SECOND ADDITION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: Section 1. That a Petition for Annexation, together with four (4) copies of the plat of said area as required by law, was filed with the Board of Trustees on the 13th day December, 1994, by the landowners of one hundred percent (100%) of the area and owning one hundred percent (100%) of the area, excluding public streets and alleys, of the area hereinafter described. The Board, by Resolution at its regular meeting on the 13th day of December, 1994, accepted said Petition and found and determined that the provisions of Section 31-12-107 (1) (g), C.R.S., were met; and the Board further determined that a public hearing should be held on January 24, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Munici- pal Building for the purposes of determining that the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S., and it considered eligible for annexation. Section 1. That the Notice of said hearing was given and published as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S., Section 3. That the hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of Section 31-12-109, C.R.S., on the 24th day of January, 1995. Section 4. That following said hearing, the Board of Trustees adopted a Resolution determining that the proposed annexation met the requirements of the applicable parts of Section 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S.; that an election was not required under Section 31-12-107(2), C.R.S.; and that no addi- tional terms or conditions are to be imposed upon said annexation. Section 5. That the annexation of the following described area designated as GREY FOX SECOND ADDITION to the Town of Estes Park, is hereby approved: Property located in Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as commencing at the North 1/16 corner of said Section 1, thence S 01Â°01'00" E a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence N 67Â°42'22" E a distance of 259.93 feet; thence S 36Â°55'26" E a distance of 199.07 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left 110.49 feet, Radius = 50.00 feet, Delta = 126Â°36'48", Chord Bearing = S 30Â°43'04" E 89.34 feet; thence S 40Â°53'40" E a distance of 188.55 feet; thence along a curve to the left 173.19 feet, Radius = 130.00 feet, Delta = 76Â°19'49", Chord Bearing = $79Â°03'34" E 160.66 feet; thence N 62Â°46'31" E a distance of 112.80 feet; thence along a curve to the right 63.97 feet, Radius = 70.00 feet, Delta = 52Â°21'24", Chord Bearing = N 88Â°57'13" E 61.76 feet; thence S 34Â°07'42" E a distance of 69.81 feet; thence N 89Â°32'33" E a distance of 408.47 feet; thence S 00Â°27'27" E a distance Of 320.00 feet; thence S 00Â°27'42" W a distance of 328.67 feet; thence S 89Â°49'19" W a distance of 1306.95 feet; thence N 00Â°50'15" E a distance of 326.54 feet; thence N 01Â°01'00" W a distance of 646.51 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 23.20 acres, more or less. Section 6. The Town of Estes Park, Colorado, hereby con- sents, pursuant to Section 37-45-126 (3.6) C.R.S., to the inclusion of lands described above into the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its option and publication. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I:hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on the 24th day of January, 1995 and published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of January, 1995, all as required by the statutes of the State of Colorado. . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING GREY FOX FIRST ADDITION AND GREY FOX SECOND ADDITION TO E-ESTATE ZONING TO TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK WHEREAS, the annexation of Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition was accomplished on the day Of , 1995; and WHEREAS, following testimony, the Board of Trustees have determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to zone Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition to the Town of Estes Park as E-Estate. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. Section 1. Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition shall be zoned as E-Estate. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , TOWN OF ESTES PARK, Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk I hereby certify that the above ordinance was introduced and read at a meeting of the Board of Trustees on the day of , 1995 and published in a newspaper of general circu- lation in the Town of Estes Park, Colorado on the day of , 1995. 13/ 2471 TOWN OF ESTES PARK Police Department - - - --/faiL-4~3*33~41 --1-3 %2143*er)/ i/Xr:" _~ i -- ,>1~ ' '*442+Udm.~ u 7,Â·444- 1 ' 4 1 - - , - -14 . .LA r. \ .4 - - -....... 1 + / February 2, 1995 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Peter Ngov Corporation d/b/a China Town Super Sea Food Ngov, Peter H. Ms. O'Connor: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Peter Ngov Corporation, d/b/a China Town Super Sea Food. Sincerely, 3 /3 - 1.~ OA Â£ /2 1 //~V,0/0 tavid J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo (303) 586-4466 â€¢ RO. BOX 1 287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 .DR 8404 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 COLORADO LIQUOR OR 3.2 % FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION 1. Applicant is a Date filed with Local Authority E)~11|q,1- E Corporation (Attach DR 8177) ~} Individual (Attach DR 8404-1) Â£ Partnership (Attach DR 8441) El Limited Liability Company (Attach DR 8405) EL /2 93344 1 a. Name of Applicant(s) If parlnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Social Security No. PaTEK HAM h kou.A k]61 whov 9%00 4 7- / 4-4- 6 2. Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone CHINA -1-0 M) N Supe.'Y< SAU=c Orf s 23 -/992 9 1 03-996 -gl ' 9 3. Address of Premises (specify exact location of premises) / 60 9 . 5-1. 0 \/ RATe st . City 1.-A-El rtâ‚¬K 00 2031'-1 County State ZIP Code E STE,% 0 REk 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City or Town State ZIP Code 9.0.ROX 9--13 E 91-e- 3 PAN?k 00 5<30 90 1-7 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following question: Present Trade Name of That Establishment (DBA) Present State License No. Present Type of License Present Expiration Date ,3-{}CATowISE+Feksâ‚¬Apoods 05-41.909.000 H ,A /2-9199_ 6. Is the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- Yes ~ ers or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- ers or directors if a corporation) or manager ever; (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? El Â® (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? Cl E (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 0% If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8. Has a liquor license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. myo 8a. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. E Og 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school, or the principal campus of any college, university or m 1Â® seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any U W current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 1 a of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that this license will be issued by virtue of ownership or under a lease? (If yes, attach a signed copy of deed or lease.) 00 D Ownership 6 Lease 0 Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Landlord Tenant Expires -3 3) BARkle.1-v NTâ‚¬RPRI J+er klek HAA)4 Ka) liAN<7 1!Flov jOi-200\ Attach a diagram of the area to be licensed (including dimensions) which shows the bars, walfs, partitions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11". (Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who has (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies) or will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST Pâ‚¬rrek HAW, KolliJN<1 11(10\|1<-3 S-TANIDLE* ok ALL 2 9-Tes> PR Ak A.&0%1 1 Attach copies of all notes and security instruments, and any written agreement or details of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises All Optional Premises applicants must attach a copy of the local ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of Optional Premises licenses. Number of separate Optional Premises areas reinested DR 8404 (2/94) Page 2 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Fes.No (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of ) Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. U El VIR 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach DR 8177: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and k I ~A not for pecuniary gain? IV IFT 0 m (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? 00 (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? 16. Colorado Manufacturer, Wholesaler or Limited Winery applicants, answer the following: (a) Will the applicant store or sell alcoholic beverages at more than one location in Colorado? If "yes," provide the 1/ ~1 address of each location and explain the activity to be conducted at each location (e.g., warehouse, salesroom, etc,) (Attach DR 8438 for each location) U El (b) If applicant 4 a wholesaler, does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. 3 El (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain whether one has been applied for. 00 17. Nonresident Manufacturer (3.2% beer or malt liquor) or Importer (3.2% beer, malt, vinous or spirituous liquor) applicants, answer the following: (a) To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intend to ship your merchandise? (b) Does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. m ID (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no," explain in detail. El.cl (d) Are you the primary source of supply in.the U.S.? If "no," explain. D El Ce)' Are all your products registered in Colorado? If "no," attach DR 8440 and register said products. 00 18. Name of Manager (lf this is an application for a Hotel and Restaurant License, the manager must also submit a Manager Registration Form Date of Birth (DR 8367) and Individual History Record CDR 8404-1). -12Â©7â‚¬K Ilkul-? limaA 414 1/40\l 10._ect-CK > " ~ ,, ~ OATH OF APPLICANT I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and comblete to the best of my knowledge. _Authorized Signatwe Title Date Â»VF~Â»*05Â« Â« (9 \11 ktÂ·f 91 6 1- -29 -4 97 -~-RE~ORT-*AND APPROVAL,ORLOCAL LICENSING'AUTHORITY: (Manufacturers, nonresident manufacturers, importers,>wholesaters, limited wineries, and public transportation licensees '. $ I disregard the section below.) .. Is this application for a: ~ New License 539 Transfer of Ownership U Other (specify) Each person required tb file DR 8404-1: Yes No Has been fingerprinted U El Background, NCIC and CCIC checked m El The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. U El If "no," the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority for D TOWN, CITY 0 COUNTY Signature Title Date Signature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. DR 84044 (02794) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE dbUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 INDIVIDUAL HISTORY RECORD To be completed by each individual applicant, all general partners of a partnership, all limited partners owning 10% (or more) of a partnership; all officers and directors of a corporation, all stockholders of a corporation owning 10% (or more) of the stock of such corporation; all limited liability company MANAG/NG members, or other limited liability company members with a 10% (or more) ownership interest in such company and all managers of a Hotel and Restaurant license. NOTICE: This individual history record provides basic information which is necessary forthe licensing authorities investigation. ALL questions must be answered in their entirety. EVERY answer you give will be checked for its truthfulness. A deliberate falsehood will jeopardize the application as such falsehood within itself constitutes evidence regarding the character of the applicant. 1. Name of Business Date Social Security Number(s) CH<AM -roWN SUPER SEAFOODS oti,29 ~95 580 - \8- \4-4-0 2. Your Full Name (last, first, middle) 3. Also Known As (maiden name/nickname, etc.) NQÂ·ov pe-FER HANCE KouAN(* 4. Mailing Address (if different from residence) Home Telephone SANE 5. Residence Address (street and number, city, state, ZIP) /53 STMA*(27 Ct'RCLE 755-76â‚¬ PARK c O 9-0â‚¬ 11 6. Date of Birth Place of Birth ' 7. U.S. Citizen? io/09155 c AN Bo-biA- Â®Yes U No If Naturaliz&d, state where When Name of U.S. District Court bâ‚¬NVER) Colo â‚¬A--D G 06/1& Isa COLD Â¥2AD-0 Naturalization Certificate Number Date of Certificate 11 an Alien, Give Alter's Registration Card Number Permanent Residence Card Number I+03 i'-70 7 06| 16 ~ 84 k.1/14 8. Height Weight Hair Color Eye Colbr Sex Race 9. Do You Have a current Drivers License? If yes, give number, & state 9- 3 lag BLK BRN PA O [9 Yes U No l j -7 54-Cl I Y 10. Name of Present Employer 11. Type of Business or Employment CHÂ®A -7bw N SopeR SEA-Tvo DI RES TAI, RAN-T 12. Address of Business Where Employed Istreet number, city, state, ZIP) Busines,Telephone 160 F. ST v RA-IN sT., â‚¬s-TG pAR.K cO %09 7 0 03) 986 - 9 (9 13. Present Position OWNâ‚¬A ~ H ANA#rEA 14. Marital Status 15. Name of Spouse (include maiden name if applicable) Har r u cl â‚¬k' 6- LI-MI 16. Spou,e's Date of Birth Spouse's Place of Birth 05-12-0 1 6 I CBM Bol> i A- ' 17. Spoubs residence address, if different than yours (street and number, city, state, ZIP) 60 < 714 M E-Â· 18. Spouse's Present Employer Occupation CHiNA -low~ Sufel 96-8-fou D-S KiT cHEN H E-Lfâ‚¬-12- - 19. Address of Spouse's Present Employer /60 9. S-T VAAÂ·iN GS-Tes FARk , 00 52-0 9(7 20. List the name(s) of all relatives working in or having a financial interest in the liquor industry. NAME OF RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP TO YOU POSITION HELD NAME OF EMPLOYER LOCATION OF EMPLOYER Nope 21. Do you now, or have you ever held a State of Colorado Liquor or Beer Ucense, or loaned money, furniture, fixtures, equipment or inventory, to any Colorado Liquor or Beer Licensee? If yes, answy in detail U Yes ~'No CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE DR 8404-1 (2/94) Page 2 22. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, or received a suspended sentence, deferred sentence, or forfeited bail for any offense in criminal or military court? (Do not indude traffic violations, unless they resulted in suspension or revocation of your drivefs license, or you were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcoholic beverages.) If yEÂ£ explain in detail. El Yes [S No 23. Have you ever received a violation notice, suspension or revocation for a liquor law violation, or been denied a liquor or beer license anywhere in the U.S.? If yes, explain in detail. 0 Yes ,+10 24. Military Service (branch) From To Serial Number Type of Discharge W IA 25. List all addresses where you have lived for the past five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary) STREET AND NUMBER CITY, STATE, ZIP FROM TO C %-3, <S-TAULEL/ 0\Fi 29-res PA % 00% ROS-1-7 PRELScELyt_ 26. List all former employers or businesses engaged in within the last five years. (Attach separate sheet if necessary.) NAME OF EMPLOYER ADDRESS (STREET, NUMBER, CITY, STATE, ZIP) POSITION HELD FROM TO LITLTr ShALÂ»+KE 4&,0 9, BRoAclwAV-veuvefi reok E--/995 ID-9 1 00 c %0209 27. What is your relationship to the applicant? (sole owner, partner, corporate officer, director, stockholder, member or manager) 28. If stockholder, nlimber of shares owned beneficially or of record Percent of outstanding stock owned ALL 29. If partner, state whether E General El Limited Percent of Partnership Owned If Limited Liability Company (percent owned) N It\- 30. Total amount you will invest in this business, including notes, loans, cash, services or equipment, and operating capital. (Reg. 46-106.1 and Reg. 47-107.1) 0 0 Â· Amount $ 10,800- 31. Identify the sources of all funds you will invest in this business as listed in 30 above. List all bank names, account numbers and the amount derived from such source. Also identify all persons authorized to sign on, or who are part owners of said account. (Attach copies of all your notes or loans used in or for this business.) Names on accounts or person who can Amounts Sources - Account Numbers sign on this account $90.0 0 0 8 H / 4/ /A j \/ â‚¬ <6+ We k)+ P erâ‚¬ R k 6 0 V $ 241 9-6 4. 2 9-res PRER\< FS AU <Fi $ 9 3 *40 p j -i ly ,Oath of.Applicant I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. Authorized Signature Title Date PRETÂ»ekltâ€ž 045 148Â¥4 (-Sco-9 9- - , 9 oâ‚¬L 1 ~ ~ - --~ - COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK SHARING AGENCY (CIRSA) 1995 CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION FOR PROPERTY/CASUALTY COVERAGES issued to the Town of Estes Park CIRSA hereby certifies that the above-mentioned municipality is a participating member of CIRSA for property/casualty coverages for the period January 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995. The coverages, conditions of membership, and other provisions applicable to CIRSA property/casualty members are described in CIRSA's bylaws, coverage and/or excess coverage policies, and general policies adopted by the members, as from time to tme amended; copies have been provided, or will be provided upon CIRSA's receipt, to the above-mentioned municipality. The types and monetary limits of the coverages to be provided to 1995 CIRSA property/casualty members shall be as described below. The scope, terms, conditions, and limitations of the coverages shall be governed by the applicable coverage policies and/or excess coverage policies, the CIRSA bylaws and Intergovernmental Agreement, and other applicable documents. I. TYPES OF COVERAGES (subject to the limit on CIRSA's liability as described in Section II below): A. Property coverage. B. Liability coverage: 1. General liability. 2. Auto liability. 3. Law enforcement liability. 4. Public officials errors and omissions liability. 5. Excess liability (for federal and out-of-state public officials claims and federal and out-of-state law enforcement). C. Crime coverage Oncluding employee dishonesty and money and securities). D. Supplemental defense cost coverage for Colorado liability claims. E. Opdonal excess crime coverage (applicable only to those members who select this coverage). II. CIRSA RETENTIONS, LOSS FUNDS, EXCESS INSURERS, AGGREGATE LIMITS, AND MEMBER DEDUCTIBLES: For the coverages described in Section I, CIRSA shall be liable only for payment of the applicable self-insured retentions and only to a total annual aggregate amount for CIRSA members as a whole of the amount of the applicable CIRSA loss fund for the coverage period. There shall be no aggregate excess coverage over any loss fund. Coverages in excess of CIRSA's self-insured retentions shall bz provided only by the applicable excess insurers in applicable excess policies, and shall be payable only by those excess insurers. The limits of coverage provided by the excess insurers in 1995 will be described in the coverage documents issued to the members. Aggregate and other limits shall apply as provided in said documents. V 1 1995 Certificate of Parlicipation for Property/Casualty Coverages page 2 Town of Estes Park A member-selected deductible shall apply to each of the municipality's claims/occurrences. Payment of the deductible shall reduce the amount otherwise payable under the applicable CIRSA retention. 1995 CIRSA SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS: A. $250,000 per claim/occurrence property. B. $ 1,000,000 per claim/occurrence liability. C. $150,000 per claim/occurrence crime. 1995 CIRSA LOSS FUND AMOUNTS: Loss fund amounts shall be as adopted or amended from time to time based on the members in the property/casualty pool for the year and interest earnings on those amounts. Information on current loss fund amounts shall be available from the CIRSA Deputy Executive Director/Chief Financial Officer. 1995 EXCESS INSURERS: A. Lloyd' s of London/Fireman' s Fund Insurance Company B. Lloyd's 6f London/Northfield Insurance Company C. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 1995 EXCESS LIMITS: A. Excess property: to $201,000,000 per claim/occurrence. B. Excess liability: to $5,000,000 per claim/occurrence (except excess auto liability: to $1,000,000 per occurrence). C. Excess crime: to $2,150,000 per claim/occurrence. MEMBER DEDUCTIBLES: A member-selected deducdble shall apply to each of the municipality's claims/occurrences. The deductible amounts selected by the Town of Estes Park are $5,000 (Liability), $5,000 (Property), and $5,000 (Auto Physical Damage). Payment of the deductible shall reduce the amount otherwise payable under the applicable CIRSA retenton. Countersigned on behalf of the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency. Timot}* A,dleer, Ex;cufl62 Director