Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Town Board 1994-12-13r - BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, December 13, 1994 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated November 22, 1994. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light & Power, December 8, 1994. B. Board of Adjustment, December 6, 1994 (acknowledgement only). C. Administrative, December 12, 1994. 4. Resolution - Setting public hearing date of January 10, 1995 for New Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License Application filed by Alpenaire Inn, Inc., 215 Virginia Drive. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Presentation of Business Plan, Phase I - platte River Power Authority. 2. Administrative Committee, December 12, 1994: A. 1995 Pay Plan Recommendations - Approval. 3. Budget: A. 1994 Supplement - Resolution Appropriating Sums of Money for the General Fund and Conference Center Fund. B. Resolution Creating the Community Reinvestment Fund. C. Renewal of the following Agreements for 1995 (compliance with TABOR): 1. Elgin Street Sweeper - 3rd Yr. of 5-Yr. Lease Agreement. 2. Robert & Nell Heron Lease to Operate Radio Transmission and Reception Systems on Prospect Mountain - 2nd Yr. of 5-Yr. Lease Agreement. 3. A-1 Trash Service Agreement - 2nd Yr. of 2-Yr. Agreement. 4. Agreement - Qualtec Quality Services, Inc. for Total Quality Management/Quality Improvement Training and Consulting Services - Approval. 1 7 , 5. Planning Commission: A. Public Hearing. Final Plat of Lot 6, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, 137 Stanley Circle Drive, Geraldine Kappely/Applicant. B. Public Hearing. Amended Plat of Lots 157 16 and 17, Block 2, Town of Estes Park, 101 E. Elkhorn Avenue (Hupp Hotel), Elizabeth Bowers/Applicant. C. Appointment - Planning Commissioner, Completing 6-yr. Term Expiring in April, 2000. D. Resolution - Intent to Annex Grey Fox First Addition and Grey Fox Second Addition. Refer to Planning Commission for their meeting January 17, 1995. 6. Committee Reassignment (Pursuant to 1995 Organizational Chart approved October 25, 1994). 7. Ordinance - Request Town to Vacate Portion of PSCo Easement in Lot 1 of the Second Amended Plat Of East Park Resubdivision/Richard Wille. 8. Resolution - Spruce Drive Bridge Rehabilitation Contract - Approval. 9. Resolution - Adoption of the Windy Gap Augmentation Plan. 10. Extension of Option to Purchase Memorandum - 0. M. Nagl & Company. 11. Town Administrator's Report: A. B. 42·· .' 'I Bbatd of Trustees Convene as the Estes Park Housing Authority 1. Quarterly Report. NOTE: The Town Board meeting scheduled December 27, 1994 has been canceled. 2 TOWn Of ESMS Park, Larimer County, Colorado, . 100,9•*eF .2? 19. ?4. Minute• of a .Regular. . . meeting of the Board of Truetees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . ?2!14 . day of . November A.D·, 19. ?4 at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor .......................... Present: Mayor Trustees: H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, Stephen W. Gillette, William J. Marshall, Also Present: Michael E. Miller, Gary F. Klaphake, J. Donald Pauley Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Vickie O'Connor, 4/646/4 Town Clerk Absent: None Mayor Dannels called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC INPUT. There was no public input. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated November 8, 1994. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Light & Power, November 10, 1994. B. Special Events, November 10, 1994. C. Public Safety, November 17, 1994. D. Administrative, November 17, 1994. E. Planning Commission, November 15, 1994 (acknowledgement only). It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Peak Shaving Rebate Program - Approval of Expenditure. Light & Power Director Matzke reviewed the Rebate Program fully described in the Committee minutes dated November 10, 1994. Staff clarified that such a program would allow large generation capabilities to operate their equipment during peak loading times which will help reduce the Town's system load coincident with PRPA' s system peak, and that the Program would be available only to commercial customers. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Pauley) the Emergency Generator Peak Shaving Rebate Program and associated equipment and installation costs not-to-exceed $6,000 be approved, and it passed unanimously. 2. Powder River Productions Contract. Special Events Director Hinze presented the contract for the Rodeo Stock Contractor, Powder River Productions. Town Attorney White prepared the Board of Trustees - November 22, 1994 - Page 2 three-year Contract and it contains a negotiated fee of $25,000/yr. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Gillette) the Contract with Powder River Productions be approved, and it passed unanimously. 3. Presentation of 1995 Budget. Finance Officer Vavra presented the 1995 Budget: A. Mayor Dannels opened a public hearing to consider the Highway User's Trust Fund. In a memorandum dated November 22, 1994, Officer Vavra reported how the Highway Users Trust Fund revenues are proposed to be expended in the ensuing fiscal year: Estimated Revenues .................. $129 , 457 Estimated Expenditures Resurfacing Overlay 150,000 Post Office Box Installation 23.000 ... $173,000 In addition, expenditures for snowplowing, street maintenance or any other expenditures directly related to streets are allowable uses of this Trust Fund revenue in the event that either of the above- referenced projects are not constructed or if they are bid at considerably less than budgeted. There being no public testimony, Mayor Dannels closed the public hearing. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Marshall) the proposed expenditures for the Highway Users Trust Fund revenues be approved, and it passed unanimously. B. Mill Levy. Staff presented a Resolution setting the mill levy of 3.079 mills which has not been increased for the past two years and corrected the general operating expenses to $160,940 and net valuation for assessment to $52,269,020. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) Resolution #21-94, as amended by Officer Vavra be approved, and it passed unanimously. C. Adopting Budget. Officer Vavra reported that the Resolution adopting the 1995 Budget was amended to reflect the three recommendations (CACEP, Advertising and PaCK) made by the Administrative Committee November 17, 1994. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Dekker) Resolution #22-94 be approved, and it passed unanimously. D. Appropriating Sums of Money. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Marshall) Resolution #23-94 Appropriating Sums of Money be approved, and it passed unanimously. E. Establishing 1994 Reserves. Administrator Klaphake clarified this Resolution which is necessitated by the TABOR Amendment. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded (Pauley/Marshall) Resolution #24-94 be approved, and it passed unanimously. F. Salaries - Municipal Court Judge and Municipal Court Clerk. Attorney White read a Resolution amending Section 2.52.020 and 2.52.040 raising the salaries for the Municipal Court Judge and Court Clerk. Staff reported that said salaries reflect a 15% increase; however, these salaries have not been amended for the past three years. Receipts reflect Board of Trustees - November 22, 1994 - Page 3 an increase in case load as citations are now being processed locally in lieu of County Court. It was moved and seconded (Pauley/Gillette) the Ordinance be approved, and it passed unanimously. Whereupon Mayor Dannels declared the Ordinance duly passed and adopted, ordered it numbered 12-94, and published according to law. G. Chamber of Commerce Operating Agreement. The Community Development Committee recommended approval of the 1995 Operating Agreement, and staff highlighted the following: (1) a chart identifying estimated quantities, rates and costs. The Agreement reflects a 3% increase and the Town is agreeing to only the unit price; (2) the A-C Book Committee will pay for postage of the Visitors Guide, and the Town will expend the $22-23,0001 for media buys; and (3) conduct a rate study in 1995. It was moved and seconded (Gillette/Doylen) the 1995 Chamber of Commerce Operating Agreement be approved, and it passed unanimously. 4. Replat Of Lot 131. Al Fresco Place Addition. John Grace/Applicant. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Doylen) the Replat of Lot 131, Al Fresco Place Addition be continued to January 10, 1995, and it passed unanimously. 5. Estes Valley Memorial Gardens Purchase of Parcel #5. Town Attorney White read a Resolution authorizing the sale of Parcel #5 for $12,783.00. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Pauley) the Purchase of Parcel #5 by Estes Valley Memorial Gardens be approved, and it passed unanimously. 6. Town Administrator's Report: A. Christmas Lighting. In a memorandum dated November 18, 1994, Administrator Klaphake reported on a meeting held with interested parties concerning downtown Christmas lighting. As the Town is currently expending $40,000 in man hours/year on lights, staf f suggested various changes to increase cost · effectiveness. committee recommendations were: 1. Twinkle lights be retained on Elkhorn Avenue (rather than clusters as suggested by staff). 2. Experiment with a heavier light set to determine whether they can withstand the elements. 3. The twinkle lights to remain until after Valentine's Day (rather than removing after New Year's). 4. Retain downtown scenes and highway tree lights. 5. Bond Park lights be phased-out, beginning this year. Discussion followed, particularly on the elimination of Bond Park lighting, and it was moved and seconded (Dekker/Pauley) Items 1-4 be approved, adding that the lights for Bond Park be installed this year with the understanding that this particular lighting will be phased-out when the Park is redesigned, and it passed unanimously. B. The Attorney General has advised that a grant known as Board of Trustees - November 22, 1994 - Page 4 "Cops Fast" for up to 75% of funding (total salary and benefits) was available. Application deadline is December 31, 1994. Based upon the fact that the Town hires officers "by need rather than dollars", and that the Town would be required to assume the salary and benefits following grant funding, it was the consensus of the Board not to proceed with this grant. C. Pursuant to a recent "Letter to the Editor" concerning the proposed fire station at Stanley Park, Administrator Klaphake clarified his position on the site selection process. In addition, staff confirmed that all three deeds for Stanley Park contain an identical clause relative to the use of the land. In April 1993, the Administrative Committee discussed eminent domain proceedings and recommended Attorney White work on obtaining Quiet Title on a "friendly basis", reimburse the heirs for their out- of-pocket" expenses, and funding to be expended from the 1992 Fund Balance. All recommendations were met. The Town has no intention of proceeding with the fire station until such time as the eminent domain action is completed. Attorney White stated that use of condemnation action for the reversionary clause would most likely not be needed. Attorney White will continue work on this project. Administrator Klaphake and Trustee Gillette met with the Rooftop Rodeo Committee and Top Hands to review the fire station plans and those in attendance found that the proposal does not conflict with the Stanley Park Master Plan. Following completion of all agenda items, Mayor Dannels announced that the Town Board meeting scheduled December 27, 1994 has been canceled, and he adjourned the meeting at 8:40 P.M. ................. Mayor Town Clerk BRA'FOR/PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Light and Power Committee December 8, 1994 Committee: Chairman Dekker, Trustees Miller and Pauley Attending: All Also Attending: Assistant Administrator Widmer, Light & Power Director Matzke, Assistant to the Light & Power Director Mangelsen, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Trustee Pauley called the meeting to order at 8:15 A.M. 1994-95 WINTER SEASON PEAK REDUCTION STRATEGIES. The Department has implemented a number of strategies over the years that attempt to reduce the Town's winter season system peak. The cost to serve load that appears only at the time of system ~ peak, is $64.68/kW. Some of these programs include demand and time-of-day rates for customers with electric heat, energy audits, highway lighting replacement, Municipal Building efficient lighting and electric thermal storage heat, and purchase of low loss distribution transformers. Although the Department has no control over these programs, the equipment has been installed and they should be working at the time of system peak. In addition, a number of strategies which require active involvement by staff to be successful include: • Substation Voltage Reduction. A 1% reduction in substation voltage results roughly in a 1% reduction in system load. A 2% voltage reduction with a system load of 18,000 kW would result in a load reduction of approximately 360 kW. • Emergency Generator Rebate Program. The Town will most likely have 140 kW of load that can be offset by customer-owned emergency generators in time for this winter season. • Street Light Override. The Department now has the capability to override the photocontrols on approximately 35kW of decorate street lights in the downtown area. In addition, the Christmas twinkle lights (14 kW) can be turned-off on peak days. • Beat-the-Peak Program. This is a public awareness program through Channel 8, KRKI and flyers requesting customers to voluntarily conserve electricity between 5:00 and 8:00 P.M. These four programs require that the Department anticipate the day that the peak might occur and then take appropriate action. The potential savings in purchase power costs can be significant. Staff will review these programs to determine their value. LOOP TRANSMISSION SERVICE TO MARYS LAKE SUBSTATION - REPORT. Director Matzke reported on this project that involves several agencies, including WAPA, PRPA, and BOR. In summary, the project will provide a second source of power to the Marys Lake Substation. The total system load can be switched most of the time to be fed from one substation during emergencies; however, this situation is not the most desirable. In addition, should the Estes Power Plant substation experience an outage, a blackout of the entire system BRADFORO PUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS p Light and Power Committee - December 8, 1994 - Page 2 could occur. At this time, two designs are being considered: install an additional breaker at the Estes switchyard, or, bypass the Estes switchyard, and construct the line directly to the Marys Lake Substation and back to the Estes switchyard. The scope of the project is still being negotiated; there is no cost to the Town as this is a standard service to PRPA members, and estimated project costs are $3.3 Million. Rebuilding of the existing 69 kV transmission line is estimated at $700,000, and costs to underground the line is being reviewed. Additional information will be presented when available. REPORTS. The November Financial Statement was unavailable; however, staff reviewed associated graphs concerning year-to-date revenues and purchased energy. Project Update: In November, the Finance Department processed 7,644 electric bills, which reflects an increase of 367 customers from November 1993--an all-time record. Electric facilities have been completed for the Stanley Views Addition.and have commenced for Prospect Estates, Phase 3. All Christmas decorations have been installed, including Bond Park. Inventory has begun and the Department's goal is to be completed by Christmas. PRPA has completed the first radio computer link-up which will eventually connect all shop computers with the mainframe computer via microwave radio. Assistant Administrator Widmer reported that PRPA will present their Business Plan to the Town Board December 13. The plan will review/explain industry trends and provide a guide for PRPA in the future. There being no further business, Chairman Dekker adjourned the meeting at 9:13 A.M. £ i A- 1-fui U O d 5. /&/4,j Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk . BRADFORO PUBLISHINGCO· RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Administrative Committee December 12, 1994 Committee of the Whole Mayor H. B. Dannels, Chairman Board of Trustees Attending: Mayor Dannels, Trustees Dekker, Doylen, Gillette, Marshall and Miller Also Attending: Administrator Klaphake, Assistant Administrator Widmer, Supervisors Hinze, Kilsdonk, Linnane, Matzke, O'Connor and Vavra Absent: Trustee Pauley Chairman Dannels called the meeting to order at 8:06 A.M. 1995 PAY PLAN - PRESENTATION. Tom Haller/Lee and Burgess presented an executive summary of the 1995 Pay Plan. Comparisons were made with the following: Local - School, YMCA, and Medical Center v Resort Communities - Breckenridge, Durango, Glenwood Springs ' and Glenwood Springs Front Range - Loveland, Fort Collins, Longmont, Lafayette, Greeley, Louisville, Brighton, Larimer and Weld Counties Other Municipally-Owned Electric Systems - Fountain, LaJunta, Fort Morgan and Lamar Thirty-seven different positions were compared and trend lines indicate that overall, the Town is competitive with the market. Concerning the benefit package, the Town is slightly above the market surveyed. The study identified certain positions in the Police Department that should be adjusted as they are below the market, and certain positions in the Light & Power Department that should be adjusted as they are above the market. Additional research will be performed on the Light & Power positions and actual findings will be presented directly to the Light and Power Committee. The firm has also prepared a new performance evaluation form; however, due to time constraints and necessary training, the firm suggests implementation take place in the near future. The Town Board must decide: Pay Range Adjustments 1. If there will be any pay range increases; 2. If the pay plan should remain at the same level as previous years, increasing approximately 3%; or 3. To slow down the rate of growth for the pay ranges to 1%- 2%. Merit/Market Increases 1. Whether or not an increase in the merit/market relative to the pay range should be granted; 2. Whether or not there should be a market increase; or 3. If there would be no merit increases across the board. BRADFORDPUSLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Administrative Committee - December 12, 1994 - Page 2 The firm is recbmmending a 2% pay range increase which will slow down the rate of growth. Staff presented the following for consideration: 1. Increase all pay ranges 2%. 2. Grant all employees, except department heads, a 2% market adjustment to their base salary. 3. Grant all employees, except department heads, a 1% team merit award, as a recognition of a very successful year for the Town. This merit award will not be an addition to the base salary. 4. Establish a 3% merit pool for department heads. Any merit increase awarded would include a maximum 2% on base salary, and the remainder as a merit adjustment which would'not be added to the base salary. 5. Adjust the grades for individual positions up or down, in accordance with the recommendations of the Pay Review. The net effect of these regrades would be a 0.7% increase to the entire payroll. 6. Complete and implement a new performance evaluation system in the fall of 1995. Based upon the above six items, the total payroll increase is 3.7%. The 1995 Budget included 3.5% for salary adjustments and the additional 0.2% would be expended from the Contingency Fund. Following additional clarification, the Committee recommends Items 1-6 as presented by staff be approved. It is further understood that the findings from the research for Light & Power Department positions will be presented directly to the Light and Power Committee for further discussion. There being no further business, Chairman Dannels adjourned the meeting at 8:45 A.M. 0 UL#.1.L (O - d~U.,4,4) Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk BRADFOROPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Board of Adjustment December 6, 1994 Board: Chairman Doylen, Members Dekker, Gillette, Newsom, and Sager Attending: Chairman Doylen, Members Dekker, Gillette, Newsom, and Sager Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Building Official Allman, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: None Chairman Doylen called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the October 4, 1994 meeting were approved as submitted. FALL RIVER ESTATES. LOT 2. BLOCK 5. DAROLD AND LOIS ROHRBAUGH/ APPLICANTS - REOUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE The Applicants are requesting two variances: (1) Section 17.24.010, B.1, which requires a 10 foot parking area setback from the high water mark of all river banks and a 15 foot parking area setback for all parking lots and (2) Section 17.24.020, C, which requires a 15 foot wide street buffer exclusive of driveway. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn reported that the variances would allow the preservation of mature trees and natural vegetation on the site. Van Horn added that the parking lot on the south side of the river shows rip rap measuring one yard per lineal foot with no encroachment into the channel or floodway, thus keeping within the nationwide permit of the Corps of Engineers. Building Official Allman noted that the site is a unique but useable river property and recommended approval of the requested variances due to the Applicant's effort to save several trees. Adjacent property owners were notified. Chairman Doylen read a letter from Del Lienemann, Fall River Estates, in favor of the request. Robert Voiland, 1524 Fish Hatchery Road, was against the request stating the Applicant's lack of concern for the preservation of the land by dynamiting a huge boulder and allowing mature trees to be destroyed either by cutting down or by changing the grade at the base of the tree. Mr. Voiland also referred to the need to examine the area during early spring runoff to determine the river flow. Chairman Doylen explained that the Development Plan will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. It was moved and seconded (Dekker-Gillette) that, in order to save several mature trees, the variances for the parking area, river setback, and street setback be approved, and it passed unanimously. Trustee Gillette requested the Planning Commission address the required easement for the proposed Hike/Bike Trail. LOT 1. ESTES PARK ORTHODONTIC CENTER SUBDIVISION. ALLNUT FUNERAL SERVICES. PATRICK NOOK & COMPANY/APPLICANT - REOUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE Trustee Gillette declared a conflict of interest and left the room. The Applicants are requesting a variance from the density requirement to allow the existing cabin to remain for employee housing. Director Stamey explained Section 17.20.606 requires that the floor area of a commercial building in the C-0 District may not exceed one-quarter times the lot area. The lot is 19,815 square feet and the dwelling requires 18,000 square feet of land area. The proposed 2,050 square foot commercial building would require an additional 8,200 square feet of land area, or a lot size of 26,200 square feet for both uses. Applicant's representative Patrick Nook reported the new structure is designed I.A.FOROPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS . Board of Adjustment Committee Meeting, December 6, 1994 - Page 2 with similar architecture as the existing log residence and would be used for visitation and service arrangement only, thus requiring very little parking. At present, several vehicles are parked around the cabin. Nook assured the Board this situation would not be allowed in the future. The private easement on the plan identifies the sewer lift station. Building Official Allman reported the existing log cabin is of questionable condition and that depending on the size of the building, there may be a need for additional parking that the cabin now displaces. Nook guaranteed the Board that code regulations would be achieved for the cabin. Member Sager stressed that approval for a density variance does not approve the development requirements. It was moved and seconded (Newsom-Sager) the density variance be approved thus allowing the cabin to remain on the property, and the motion passed with Member Gillette abstaining. Member Gillette returned to the room. FALL RIVER ESTATES. LOTS 13 & 14. BLOCK 1. DEL LIENEMANN/APPLICANT - REOUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE This area was first platted under Larimer County regulations (10 foot setback) but became subject to the Town regulations when annexed in 1982. The Applicant is requesting a variance from Section 17.20.040,B.1 which requires a 25 foot setback from the property line. Realtor Debbie Coleman reported that Lot 14 has sold but Lots 12 and 13 are owned by the developer. The owner of Lot 14 is aware of the setback request and submitted a possible building footprint for this lot. Applicant's representative Paul Kochevar reported that although the lots in question are over an acre in size, the building area is restricted to the upper, westerly portions of each lot due to the sewer line location and the steepness of the site. The need to preserve trees is also a concern for Lot 14. Kochevar confirmed that these lots cannot further be subdivided due to the minimum lot size required for E-Estate zoning. Coleman spoke in favor of allowing the variance due to the difficulty in selling the lots as is. Building Official Allman confirmed steep slopes on both lots, but without a building sketch for Lot 13, it would be difficult to determine the amount of setback needed. It was moved and seconded (Gillette- Dekker) that approval be given for the setback variance request. Member Sager expressed concern as the motion did not include findings. Member Gillette withdrew the motion. After further discussion, it was moved and seconded (Gillette-Dekker) that approval be given for the setback variance request due to the exceptional topographical conditions and the narrowness of the lots, and it passed unanimously. There being no further business, Chairman Doylen adjourned the meeting at 9:37 a.m. 1-K l.uu. Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk PLATTE |~ RIVER POWER Business Plan Development Process AUTHORITY General Project Information Overview I Phase 1 Purpose: The business plan process will evaluate opportunities The project plan includes four phases: (1) Initial Situation Analysis, Objective: Complete an initial situation analysis of industry related and challenges facing Platte River. The completed plan (2) Strategic Direction, (3) Organizational Review, and (4) trends and issues and develop alternative future scenarios will help guide Plane River into the future by identify- Development of Action Plans. The project will use a team approach and a range of options. ing business strategies, associated policies and required and include Board input throughout the process with a formal action plans. Board review at the completion of each phase. Initial Situational Why: The utility industry is rapidly moving from a regulated I " Analysis Situation 1__.1Al'rnative 111.-- monopoly environment to ati open competitive ~ Analy,im I Future industry Increased competition, deregulation and 1 Scenarios 111 technology advances will require Platte River to become - Phase 1 more customer focused, cost conscious and able to 1 -g00, 1 respond to opportunities and challenges more quickly. Optons A business plan that is clearly understood by the Board intern*F External of Directors, management and staff will strengthen our Board Review ~ competitive position. Strategic Direction - Who: t f Board of ~ Wooknesses ~ Board/Mgmt. Customer Industry Detailed ~ Directors ~~~0~~~~ Situational Trind 9/Iss ue, Analysis ~--_ Bu•in••s 11-1*/Risk Phase 2 Str,ngthi Val... As-,*ment Develop , , Strategic CONTACTS: Division Managers or Bob Abiecunas Business Objectives Board Review i When: Project completion is projected for May 1995. The Alternative ~ following are the anticipated Board review dates for Ofganize- 1 Future Scenarios Phase 3 tional 1 each project phase, I Review ] • Phase 1 December 15, 1994 Board Review ~ Develop • Phase 2 March 9, 1995 Phase 4 Action J Range of • Phase 3 April 27, 1995 , plans _Options • Phase 4 May 25, 1995 Board Review Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Objective: Complete a detailed analysis of Platte River's present Objectiue: Complete a review of Platte River's internal processes Objective: Develop divisional action plans; including goals, mea- core business operations, and future opportunities and and organizational structure. surable success factors, strategies and targets. recommend (for Board consideration) a strategic direc- tion. Based on analysis resu 1ts develop corporate strate- gic business objectives. Determine Strategic Direction 04*811•tional R.viow Develop Action Plan Corporate Builness Review Internal Procl#00* Dlvlslonal MIssion/Goals Electric ~ Review '09 1-2=1 (3 - 5 Years) OPP. 1 = 1 1 5 : 1= 11Tral.. 1 -491 organizatlonal Stamng Measurable Success Factors 11 W Marketing ~- -ELI - Sti«111*'Imptomentotton Strategies :2.2- I ..I Plan ..:.1 ? 1- Targets , 1 Develop SBO'• Employee' Task ~ Teams . RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: That the filing date of the application for a New Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License, filed by Alpenaire Inn, Inc. , dba ALPENAIRE INN, 215 Virginia Drive, Estes Park, Colorado, is December 8, 1994. It is hereby ordered that a public hearing on said application shall be held in the Board Room of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, on Tuesday, January 10, 1995 at 7:30 P.M., and that the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose Of said application and hearing shall be the area included within a radius of 3.03 miles, as measured from the center of the applicant's property. ADOPTED: ' BRAOFOROPUBLISHINGCO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Administrative Committee - December 12, 1994 - Page 2 The firm is recommending a 2% pay range increase which will slow down the rate of growth. Staff presented the following for consideration: 1.4. 1. Increase all pay ranges 2%. 2. Grant all employees, except department heads, a 2% market adjustment to their base salary. 3. Grant all employees, except department heads, a 1% team merit award, as a recognition of a very successful year for the Town. This merit award will not be an addition to the base salary. 4. Establish a 3% merit pool for department heads. Any merit increase awarded would include a maximum 2% on base salary, and the remainder as a merit adjustment which would not be added to the base salary. 5. Adjust the grades for individual positions up or down, in accordance with the recommendations of the Pay Review. The net effect of these regrades would be a 0.7% increase to the entire payroll. 6. Complete and implement a new performance evaluation system in the fall of 1995. Based upon the above six items, the total payroll increase is 3.7%. The 1995 Budget included 3.5% for salary adjustments and the additional 0.2% would be expended from the Contingency Fund. Following additional clarification, the Committee recommends Items 1-6 as presented by staff be approved. It is further understood that the findings from the reseaFch for Light & Power Department positions will be presented directly to the Light and Power committee for further discussion. There being no further business, Chairman Dannels adjourned the meeting at 8:45 A.M. 0 bult .ii- t/ ~ ll».4 6 J Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk SENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT ;12- 6-94 12:35PM ; 6699380-4 303 586 6909:# 2 RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE SUMS OF MONEY NO. A RESOLUTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK'S 1994 GENERAL PUND AND CONFERENCE CENTER FUND BUDGETS. WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park has been awarded Federal ISTEA and State Go Colorado funds that total $200,000.00 to offset the expenditures incurred in constructing the Lake Estes Hike/Bike Trail; and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park has received Federal Energy Conservation funds in the amount of $10 ,533.00 to finance the purchase of recycle trash containers and to prepare and publish recycle information; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 1994 the voters of the Town of Eates Park approved a ballot question allowing the Town to retain all excess revenues above the revenue limitations of Article X of Section 20 of the Colorado constitution: and WHEREAS, the above-mentioned excess revenues will need to be transferred to the Community Reinvestment Fund in the anticipated amount of $106,981.00 at the close of the 1994 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Conference Center Fund is receiving a transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account in the amount of $6,505.00 to offset the costs of cleaning the exterior of the building that was not included in the original 1994 Conference Center budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THAT: 1. The following 1994 budgets be amended as follows: 1994 Revised Fund Amount Budget General Fund $317,514.00 $6,974,192.00 Conference Center Fund 6,505.00 456,144.00 2. The General Fund revenue sources are the Federal ISTEA and Energy Conservation grant, the State Go Colorado fund•, and the excess revenue. SENT.BY:HAMMOND CLARK·WHIT ;12- 6-94 12:36FM ; 65993©U-0 3193 565 590'91 ** D 3. The Conference Center Fund revenue source is a transfer from the General Fund Contingency account. ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 1994. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk Dell I bY:MWFIMUGU LLHKA Wrll I , 14- 0-94 1 4 2 DC)r19 ; bb990©U-0 DUO bob 5909; A 44 RESOLUTION TO CREATE THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND NO. A RESOLUTION TO CREATE THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND FOR THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK. WHEREAS, the voters of the Town of Estes Park approved a ballot question on November 8, 1994 for the Town of Estes Park to retain all revenues that exceed applicable revenue limits as set forth in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution; and WHEREAS, excess revenues will be transferred to the Communi- ty Reinvestment Fund to be spent on designated projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THAT: 1. The Community Reinvestment Fund is established for the Town of Estes Park. Adopted this 13th day of December, 1994. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 457 TOWN OF ESTES PARK i RP-1.- .48* :4~42~ 4.23 - -AL:r'*Nt,...f - V ..-5/F --tf M-;39:*06 -- - SU¥ 1 -*: L MEMORANDUM December 9, 1994 TO: Honorable Mayor Dannels Town Board of Trustees £P .A FROM: Rich Widmer-~->£··C~-_ Assistant Togp/Administrator SUBJECT: Qualtec Quality Services Contract One of the Town Board's adopted goals is to begin a Total Quality Management Program for Town employees. After researching and evaluating many different ways to accomplish this goal, staff has determined that a joint, cooperative approach with Platte River Power Authority (PRPA) and other member cities is the most cost- effective method. A contract with PRPA's consultant, Qualtec Quality Services, Inc., has been negotiated and reviewed by Town Attorney White. It is a two-year contract which is subject to annual appropriation by the Town in the budget, and which may be canceled at any time for any raason by the Town. It allows for cost-sharing between the Town and other member Cities, and establishes costs for training management and employees in Total Quality principles. Costs for training 10 management and 14 employees during 1995 are $16,354, if two cities participate. If three participate, this cost drops to $11,721. The cost to continue the program into 1996 would depend upon the type of training desired. The contract anticipates $10,559 in 1996 costs, but this would be modified as the Town becomes more certain of its training needs. At this time, Loveland and Estes Park are committed to this program, with the possibility of Longmont or others joining us later in 1995 or 1996. nA'n :.RA_:·11-1 . PA Rn\' 1 11(10 0 KTA pAR 1< rn 805-1 7 • FAX (303) 586-(1749 COMMUN ITY DEVELOPMENT • FAX 1.303) 384,4 0(19 (DTH ER Town of Estes Park Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Qualtec Quality Services Contract -2- December 9, 1994 Our 1995 cost would be funded with $7,050 from 1994 carry-over and $9,304 budgeted in 1995. The costs cited above are reasonable given the week-long training involved and when compared to the cost to establish a TQM program by ourselves. PRPA spent over $60,000 per year for several years to begin their program, and Fort Collins spent even larger sums. We are reaping the benefit of their experience and advice. Staff recommends the Mayor be authorized to sign the contract with Qualtec Quality Services, Inc. 4 24% 4 944*i,4 911 U·k€A --•'W,lip l.·21:1':4 *€0M-·.4 142. 4.·t.'·A·Mo. il ... *%+ 0 <Ng - 2 0, U.1 U.1 20 fOR > ka ... me.ax lilli\,; ..4..Sy ;t3#8 ~ (D 0 x O k m 0 2 DEO O.-= M .2 42 4 &00 3 6 mc 02.Q k u 2 . & 2 9 -2 2 2.0 0 M=b ·08 5 € s f 3 2 s i m #3* R - 0 ¢0 0 *0 2 e -re« Zi i g 3€8825 %193~3 2 1 € E U. u 0. 7 f' 5 3 8 8 g z 8.- 95#80 d = 0 - g a - ™ E.2 gs·@22%~ 8 i 8 ~0 56.E Z 1~ r: N ~ € 2232¤. >.2 M-~l a ~ ~~· 5.- .& i *€ 88=24§28-to:immE 2 & 4 0 3 82; 6-040==1=96.4.==0 04 M 311Vld AllkIOHinV All activities within the QI process are based on not only satisfying the needs and they do by y work; it is my work. ue Ol ums!1 01 spoou sn Jo Vou ptle UOUHAUOUI-JIPS JOJ ~Ookoidula B s! (VOad) liv-'13040 Sumseqdmo 4 UKJ~j)*21261% QI PRINCIPLES four underlying principles of quality: Customer Satisfaction means able expectation 01108 (t) pUB 'plp noK lutim 041 9Aolduu! Jo 10119 luaANd 01"ue 'ssgoold IRAOFORO PU~LISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS planning Commission - August 16, 1994 - page 4 Q.A. 2.- Final Plat. Lot 6. Little prosnect Mountain Addition. 137 Stanley Circle Drive. Geraldine Kangely/Applicant. The Applicant proposes dividing an existing lot, zoned R-S one and two family, into two lots of 1.44 and 1.29 acres. Existing land use is one single family dwelling on Lot 6A; Lot 6B is vacant. With one exception, development that has occurred in the Little Prospect Mountain area has been single family. In order to maintain compatibility, a note should be placed on the plat which limits use of each lot to one single family dwelling. Mr. Van Horn stated that the existing driveway curb cut would be used and such to be added to the plat, and that both lots would be connected to Estes Park Sanitation District service. It was moved and seconded (Burgess-Cooper) the Kappely Subdivision of Lot 6, Little Prospect Mountain Addition be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions being met prior to Town Board approval, and it passed unanimously: 1. Single family use note be added to the plat. 2. If driveway access is shared, a maintenance agreement note be added to the plat. 3. Overhead utility lines relocated at owner expense. 4. Submit additional drawings showing the intent to connect both properties to Estes Park sanitation District. THIS PLAT IS STILL INCOMPLETE;·.PLEASE MAKE A MOTION WITHDRAWING THIS ITEM. ,@.al/ Amended Plat. Town of_Eaten_Park. Lots 15. 16. 6 17. Block 2. 101 E. Elkhorn Avenue- (Hupp Hotel). Elizabeth Bowers/Applicant. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn stated this area is zoned C-D Commercial Downtown, and the Applicant is proposing to combine the three lots into two. Because of concerns voiced by Estes Park Sanitation District, Applicant will do a specific locate for the service line for Lot 27, which appears to flow under the buildings on Lots 15, 16, and 17, and provide an easement describing its location. Ernie Petrocine, Western Brands, expressed concern regarding the status Of the access, sewer, and water easements. Encroachments of the existing building and possible solutions were discussed at length. Chairman Sager reported on safety concerns expressed by Police Chief Racine regarding the building encroachment into the right-of-way. chairman Sager is opposed to any change in the property until the encroachment issue has been resolved. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix-Pohl) the Amended Plat, Town of Estes Park, Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block 2, 101 E. Elkhorn Avenue, combining the three lots into two be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions being met prior to Town Board approval, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note on the plat that acceptance of this amended plat does not approve the encroachments of the buildings on the west side of, the property into Big Horn Drive. . 2. A drainage and access easement be provided in the open area between the two buildings. 3. A maintenance agreement note be added to the plat that a sanitary sewer/storm sewer cleanout exists* in this area. 4. A drainage maintenance agreement note be added to the plat that a drainage problem exists along Big Horn Drive due to the building and landscape encroachments. 5. Each building be separately metered by 3/4" water meters. 6. Access easement be provided across Lots 15A and 16A, 20 feet wide, which incorporates the existing travelled way. 7. Applicant to install a curb and 3-foot walkway along Big Horn and be responsible for maintenance. 8. An easement be provided for the sewer line from Lot 27, or said line be relocated. The · Planning Commission also requested that Town Attorney White comment on the Town's ability to require removal of the building encroachment. THIS PLAT IS STILL INCOMPLETE; PLEASE MAKE A MOTION WITHDRAWING THIS ITEM. i RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-107 (1) (g), C.R.S., hereby states its intention to annex the area described herein. The Board of Trustees find and determines that the Petition filed with the Town requesting annexation of the area described herein is in substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107(1) (g), C.R.S. The Board of Trustees further finds and determines that the Petition is signed by persons comprising one hundred (100%) percent of the landowners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning one hundred (100%) percent of the area, excluding public streets, and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality. Such area, if annexed, will be known as "GREY FOX FIRST ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. Such area is described as follows: Property located in Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as beginning at the North 1/16 corner of said Section 1, thence N 89°48'12" E a distance of 1318.48 feet; thence S 00°27'27" E a distance of 1074.65 feet; thence S89°32'33" W a distance of 408.47 feet; thence N 34°07'42" W a distance of 69.81 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left 63.97 feet, Radius = 70.00 feet;, Delta = 52°21'24", Chord Bearing = S 88°57'13" W 61.76 feet; thence S 62°46'31" W a distance of 112.80 feet; thence along a curve to the right 173.19 feet, Radius = 130.00 feet, Delta = 76°19'49", Chord Bearing = N 79°03'34" W 160.66 feet; thence N 40°53'40" W a distance of 188.55 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right 110.49 feet, Radius = 50.00 feet, . Delta = 126°36'48", Chord Bearing = N 30°43'04" W 89.34 feet; thence N 36°55'26"·W a distance Of 199.07 feet; thence S67°42'22" W a distance of 259.93 feet; thence N 01°01'00" W a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 28.64 acres, more of less. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with Section 31-12-108, C.R.S., a public hearing shall be held on January 24, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Municipal Building, located at 170 MacGregor, Estes Park, Colorado, for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk shall give the notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the plat of the Grey Fox First Addition be referred to the Planning Commission to begin the necessary procedures to make the property subject to the zoning ordinances of the Town. DATED THIS day of , 1994. Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED EY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES \ PARK, COLORADO: The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, in accordance with Section 31-12-107(1) (g), C.R.S., hereby states its intention to annex the area described herein. The Board of Trustees find and determines that the Petition filed with the Town requesting annexation of the area described herein is in substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107(1) (g), C.R.S. The Board of Trustees further finds and determines that the Petition is signed by persons comprising one hundred (100%) percent of the landowners in the area proposed to be annexed and owning one hundred (100%) percent of the area, excluding public streets, and alleys and any land owned by the annexing municipality. Such area, if annexed, will be known as "GREY FOX SECOND ADDITION" to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. Such area is described as follows: Property located in Section 1, T4N, R73W of the 6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, more particularly described as commencing at the North 1/16 corner of said Section 1, thence S 01°01'00" E a distance of 750.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence N 67°42'22" E a distance of 259.93 feet; thence S 36°55'26" E a distance of 199.07 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left 110.49 feet, Radius = 50.00 feet, Delta = 126°36'48", Chord Bearing = S 30°43'04" E 89.34 feet; thence S 40°53'40" E a distance of 188.55 feet; thence along a curve to the left 173.19 feet, Radius = 130.00 feet, Delta = 76°19'49", Chord Bearing = $79°03'34" E 160.66 feet; thence N 62°46'31" E a distance of 112.80 feet; thence along a curve to the right 63.97 feet, Radius = 70.00 feet, Delta = 52°21'24", Chord Bearing = N 88°57'13" E 61.76 feet; thence S 34°07'42" E a distance of 69.81 feet; thence N 89°32'33" E a distance of 408.47 feet; thence S 00°27'27" E a distance of 320.00 feet; thence S 00°27'42" W a distance of 328.67 feet; thence S 89°49'19" W a distance of 1306.95 feet; thence N 00©50'15" E a distance of 326.54 feet; thence N 01°01'00" W a distance of 646.51 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 23.20 acres, more or less. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with Section 31-12-108, C.R.S., a public hearing shall be held on January 24, 1995, at 7:30 P.M., in the Municipal Building, located at 170 MacGregor, Estes Park, Colorado, for the purpose of determining if the proposed annexation complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk shall give the notice of the hearing as provided in Section 31-12-108(2), C.R.S. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the plat of the Grey Fox Second Addition be referred to the Planning Commission to begin the necessary procedures to make the property subject to the zoning ordinances of the Town. DATED THIS day of , 1994. Town Clerk COMMITTEE REASSIGNMENT Original Appointment April 12, 1994: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MISCELLANEOUS DOYLEN, Sue/Chairman Museum Liaison DEKKER, Bob PAULEY, Don CACEP Liaison Proposed December 13, 1994: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DOYLEN, Sue/Chairman DEKKER, Bob MARSHALL, Bill Original Appointment April 12, 1994: SPECIAL EVENTS MISCELLANEOUS DOYLEN, Sue/Chairman Rooftop Rodeo Committee Liaison GILLETTE, Stephen MARSHALL, Bill Approved by Town Board October 25, 1994: SPECIAL EVENTS - DISBANDED effective 1/1/95 To remain in effect: PAULEY, Don CACEP Liaison ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A GAS EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 1 OF EAST PARK RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 BLOCK 8, 1st ADDITION TO LONE PINE ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado, has determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to permanently abandon and cease to maintain, operate, control, and use a portion of the existing gas easement over the following described property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOA.RD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLOPADO. Section 1. The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, Colorado hereby vacates the following described easement: A portion of Lot 1 of East Park Resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, 1st Addition to Lone Pine Addition to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado. Commencing at the SW corner of Lot 1 of East Park Resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, 1st Addition to Lone Pine Addition to the Town of Estes Park, Colorado: Thence N 01°41'45" W 334.32'; Thence S 88°18'15" E 65.79'; Thence S 73°48'15" E 11.41' To the Point of Beginning; Thence S 73°48'15" E 17.40'; Thence S 24°54'22" W 2.64'; Thence N 65°05'38" W 17.20' to the Point of Beginning. Section 2. The Town hereby surrenders any and all right, title and interest to said portion of the easement. Section 3. The adoption of this Ordinance is hereby de- clared to be an emergency in order for the immediate vacation. of the easement, and; WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Board of Trustees that an emergency exists and this Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced immediately after its passage, adoption and signature by the Mayor. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO, THIS DAY OF , 1994. TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO By: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk December 7, 1994 Board of Trustees Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Board Members, This is a request to vacate approximately 23 square feet of a Public Service Company easement in Lot 1 of the 2nd Amended Plat of East Park Resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Lone Pine Acres Addition to the Town Of Estes Park. This vacation is being requested by the title company and has been approved by Public Service Company of Colorado. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, OU-- d 3-11 Richard H. Wille \ n i 108 0-li i . / PI ; i . 0898 9 6\\\ - 1 € 2.99 , I b.:1. ' 1 / lu * 0 N 41 2 ; g ~ LL 6 ,. 1 , 9 10 1. r '042 13 8 '000,/r -- 25% l. , 0% 4 *60 1 r - 9. , te Q ~ 1- . A i /2 - O i.. $ 1 M . 1 1 O 1 0 :tit i./*·/ 1 . /125.... 14 OR:lit . F-- '-0, , 1 4 . -3< 24 a n 0 >- - 44 --- -1 Q '11...1 \b - 1 \ 0 10 r. » -- / ,+ e Z N q / liu lu w/ 9 3 D [il 1· «44»7 1 __TTEL-- - E--- 3,--f-fnE--12.- EL 8. r , 'Z --- y W >.W - 1 5 91- 72 11 2 35 b Z.a- 9 11 ' O, , (0. . P /- . 1 el L-0 1 N lo 1 -- I -ne i 1 Ite 1 2 r ' iE 1 -/ N / I + Z J -- 0 Z 4 I / m a LO 0 - 48 Ta 1 1 3 :l li, 12 Og: bc , L.LI 70 0 q !O 5< 6.4 1 .' -1 UA U.1. 0 lu O.J lu-J 7- i li . 120 i: 00 4 / \ .6.0. .0/ 3: 1 4! t 09 - 11 .O- --0.0 1 1 i : + 2 RM OLD / O K N / N,9 10 2/ / ant JOI 1 5 ~ W./////// 83.46 0/°41'45' E 634.21' ~ 5946 ON d H.LWA £¥838 3.62,25 9 „8£,2*09 0 l . DESCRIPTION OF A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT TO BE VACATED COMMENCING AT THE SW CORNER OF LOT 1 OF EAST PARK RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 8. 1 st ADDITION TO LONE PINE ADDIRON TO THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO; THENCE N 01'41'45" W 334.32'; THENCE S 88'18'15" E 65.79% THENCE S 73'48'15" E 11.41' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 73'48'15" E 17.40'; THENCE S 24'54'22" W 2.64% THENCE N 65'05'38" W 17.20' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. N 01'41'45 W 634.21' - - 334.32' - -- -I -3 Ul ~ & 65.79' 4 * 2 0. - . 512.25' N 01'41'45" W O D BUILDING C <.64, i l i l ll /- 10' GAS EASEMENT ;. , - 1,~=.-- SCALE: 10' = 30' 1 1 1: 6 l iM 0 WILLIAM G. VAN HORN CO PE. & LS. #9485 VAN HORN ENGINEERING SCALE PROJ. NO. DRAWN DATE William G. Van Horn, P.E. & LS. 9485 1043 Fish Creek Rood - P.O. Box 456 - Estes Pork, CO 80517 1" = 30' 93-1-11 KKH 11-11-94 Phone: (303) 586-9388 - Fax: (303> 586-8101 1-Z:2...1714, c.%211-ZZ---1--LrlicE C_·r¥ I ett 1 Van Horn Englneenng 1-· P.O. Box 456 Fax, 986'-211(I-29-78 2 -2 1 , Estes Park, Colorado 80517 Dear Bill, Public Service Company of Colorado has an existing gas main that is located between 1861 Raven, Building B and 1861 Raven, Building C. The gas main is approximately 5.5 - 6.0 feet south of Building C and therefore we have no problem with a vacation of the 10 foot gas easement for the portion ofthe building that is encroaching. The gas main is located approximately 2.75 - 3.0 feet away from tile concrete foundations which support the deck for Building B. The deck overhangs approximately 3.0 feet and is therefore essentially over the gas main. Although this situation is less than desirable, there are no good alternatives to correct the problem other than removing the deck. Therefore we have no objection to vacating the 10 foot utility easement for the portion of the building/deck that is encroachjng at the ground level (not that portion of the deck overhang that extends approximately to the gas main). If you have any questions or need further clarification, please contact me at 225- 7842 or Gary Huett at 225-7840. Sincerely, <46353 Rick Catlett Northern Division Engineering ** TOTAL PAGE.001 ** DEC- 6-94 TUE 1:37 PM 303 225 7833. P. 1 f STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303)353-1232 December 2, 1994 BRO C060-002 Spruce Dr at Fall R (Estes Park) [EP-SPRC-FAL1] Sub: 10569 Mr. Greg Sievers Construction and Public Facilities Manager Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Greg: Enclosed for review and City Council action are four copies of the contract between the Town of Estes Park and the Department of Transportation for this project. If the contracts are acceptable, the Council must pass either a resolution or ordinance (whichever you deem appropriate) authorizing someone to execute a contract on behalf of the Town. This authorization should contain a commitment that the Town will match the federal funding for the project at the specified rate. A copy of the resolution or ordinance must be attached to the contract at the appropriate place. If the resolution contains a dollar amount, such amount shall not be less than the amount of the local agency's contribution as shown in the contract, but may exceed this amount if you intend to overmatch the federal funds. Three copies of the contract are to be signed by the person authorized to bind the Town to the terms of the contract and returned to me, undated, for the State's signatures. The fourth copy is intended for the Town's review and comment prior to signing the contract and can be retained in your files pending the receipt of a fully executed contract. Sincerely, 9103 1*1410#AL David M. Martine£/ Region 4 Project Manager DMM/dmm Enclosures cc: File via McKee/Martinez Leonard/Turner Central Files ic Z UT 10 . W ~j~-«\00»2---- 61 t~= i 4#11_ 41 k - 0, yl | L_-1 11 2 E '1 #, kin U N - 1 h\\\ ill I -- . a /1 1 6 LLI -JR D LU \ 9\\ 7 Nlt / r !\ 4 11 w I Ff m z / N/ 01 N k' o r r- z I J I Z LU > 4 i n' 1 1 n-- 00 1 i *a-1 0 N I -XI \ ~ 431 - M N N -3 LLI / h#-1 8 k. 10 - ))464 %' 6 Q ,+ 39/<, C~ « \ 11\ ( r/ , N ,-4/z,6 1 1 1 194 10 ig 1 1 94 ...I , / lil / ./,6 , LU o \4 (0 1 .2 - 1/// /,/0 + I / '1 / 0 J ix -' // CD \ y *A - - C 1 . 11 41/+ 08» 111 26 1 MS ~ L_ - 0 le) oi 4- 12 x *f - 999 1221 /) /9/ - if f ct .2 -- ~ 41\ AT 1 ~ , t r-r·-r- \\ 4 14\ 1 K g/f /h \\ i 7623.5 1 12?d:3!£11 . - d (42 4221 892 ~\%\\\,~4~~~~ 129 79'v SENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT ;12- 9-94 3:46PM ; 6699380+ 303 586 6909;#02 - RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park owns tranemountain water rights but in an insufficient quantity to meet all of ite raw water requirements. Therefore, native water must be diverted to meet municipal demands, however, the Town's native water rights are junior and subject to long periods of being out-of-priority. Therefore, to meet its demands, the Town must divert native water out-of-priority for municipal use and replace any depletions so that downstream water rights are not injured; and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park owns certain direct flow native water rights on Black Canyon Creek known as the Estes Park Town Company Pipeline and the Estes Park Water Company Pipeline Extension. Said water rights may be also used by changing the points of diversion of said water rights to the Town's points of diversion located on Fall River and Glacier Creek, and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park has hired Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. to prepare a plan for augmentation, which plan has been received by the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, this plan describes water use, consumption and return flows for the Town of Eates Park and proposes a plan of augmentation for replacing out-of-priority diversions of native water to prevent injury. The proposed sources of replacement water are first use and reuse credits of Windy Gap Project water owned by the Town. An operating and accounting plan is described which would allow the Town to replace out-of-priority diversions without injury to other water rights; and WHEREAS, it is also necessary to file for an adjudication of appropriative rights of substitution and exchange to effectuate the plan for augmentation; and WHEREAS, The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, the Town staff and its consultants have reviewed the Water Augmentation Plan and have determined that it is appropriate for the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to file with the Di•trict Court. Water Division I of the State of Colorado an application for change of water rights, approval of plan for augmentation and adjudication for appropriative rights of substitution and exchange. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. - 5ENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT ; 12- 9-94 D .4 ,! i. I 1. That the Town Attorney, Gregory A. White is hereby authorized to file an application for change of water rights, approval of plan for augmentation and adjudication for appropriate rights of substitution and exchange including any necessary deletions, amendments or changes thereto with the District Court, Water Division I, State Of Colorado. 2. That Gregory A. White is hereby further authorized, in coordination with the Town staff and Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., to proceed with all necessary steps to have said applica- tion approved by the District Court, Water Division I, State of Colorado, including whatever amendments, revisions and stipu- lations are necessary for final Court approval. Dated this day of December, 1994. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: ATTEST: Town Clerk MEMORANDUM OF EXTENSION OF OPTION TO PURCHASE NOW COMES, 0. M. NAGL & CO., hereinafter referred to as "Nagl," and the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Town, " and state and affirm as follows: 1. The Town entered into an Option to Purchase agreement with O.M. Nagl & Co., dated the 17th day of March, 1994. A Memorandum of Option to Purchase was recorded on May 25, 1994 at Reception Number 94045173, Larimer County, Colorado. 2. The parties have extended said Option to Purchase through January 31, 1995. 3. The closing date of said Option to Purchase, if exercised by Town, shall be extended to on or before February 15, 1995. 4. All of the remaining terms and conditions of the Option to Purchase shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Extension of Option to Purchase this day of December, 1994. 0. M. NAGL & CO. BY: d 1 -ae,f O. M. 'NAGI, cf~ L TOWN OF ESTES PARK BY: H. BERNERD DANNELS, Mayor Attest: VICKIE O'CONNOR, Town Clerk EXTENSION OF OPTION TO PURCHASE This Extension made and entered by and between 0. M. NAGL & CO. , hereinafter referred to as ( "Nagl" ), and the TOWN OF ESTES PARK, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as ("Town"); WITNESSETH The parties entered into an Option to Purchase on March 17, 1994. The parties desire to extend said Option to Purchase according to the terms and conditions set forth herein. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions as herein set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Option to Purchase shall be extended through January 31, 1995. 2. The closing date for this transaction, if the Option is exercised by Town, shall be on or before February 15, 1995. 3. All of the remaining terms and conditions of the Option to Purchase shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Option to Purchase this day of December, 1994. 0. M. NAGL & CO. O.- M. NAGL L TOWN OF ESTES PARK BY: H. BERNERD DANNELS, Mayor Attest: VICKIE O'CONNOR, Town Clerk 7 SENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT :12- 9-94 3:46PM ; 66993800 303 586 6909;# 2 . . 4 Z RESOLUTION NO. 32-9+ WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park owns transmountain water rights but in an insufficient quantity to meet all of its raw water requirements. There fore, native water must be diverted to meet municipal demands, however, the Town's native water rights are junior and subject to long periods of being out-of-priority. Therefore, to meet its demands, the Town must divert native water out-of-priority for municipal use and replace any depletions so that downstream water rights are not injured; and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park owns certain direct flow native water rights on Black Canyon Creek known as the Estes Park Town Company Pipeline and the Estes Park Water Company Pipeline Extension. Said water rights may be also used by changing the points of diversion of said water rights to the Town's points of diversion located on Fall River and Glacier Creek, and WHEREAS, the Town of Estes Park has hired Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. to prepare a plan for augmentation, which plan has been received by the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, this plan describes water use, consumption and return flows for the Town of Bates Park and proposes a plan of augmentation for replacing out-of-priority diversions of native water to prevent injury. The proposed sources of replacement water are first use and reuse credits of Windy Gap Project water owned by the Town. An operating and accounting plan is described which would allow the Town to replace out-of-priority diversions without injury to other water rights; and WHEREAS, it ia also necessary to file for an adjudication of appropriative rights of substitution and exchange to effectuate the plan for augmentation; and WHEREAS, The Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park, the Town staff and its consultants have reviewed the Water Augmentation Plan and have determined that it is appropriate for the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to file with the District Court, Water Division I of the State of Colorado an application for change of water rights. approval of plan for augmentation and adjudication for appropriative rights of substitution and exchange. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO. .------- 0 SENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT ;12- 9-94 3:47PM ; 6699380-9 ,DUO Juu W-w-, n - I . 1. That the Town Attorney. Gregory A. White is hereby authorized to file an application for change of water rights. approval of plan for augmentation and adjudication for appropriate rights of substitution and exchange including any necessary deletions, amendments or changes thereto with the District Court, Water Division I, State of Colorado. 2. That Gregory A. White is hereby further authorized. in coordination with the Town staff and Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc.. to proceed with all necessary steps to have said applica- tion approved by the District Court, Water Division I, State of Colorado, including whatever amendments, revisions and stipu- lations are necessary for final Court approval. Dated this day of December, 1994. TOWN OF ESTES PARK By: ATTEST: Town Clerk