The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPACKET Town Board 1994-08-234 BOARD OF TRUSTEES - TOWN OF ESTES PARK Tuesday, August 23, 1994 7:30 P.M. AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT. To conduct an orderly, efficient meeting, individuals will be given a maximum of up to three (3) minutes to speak on topics which are pertinent to Town affairs. Any exceptions will be given at the discretion of the Mayor. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated August 9, 1994. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Public Safety, August 18, 1994. B. Planning Commission, August 16, 1994 (acknowledgement only). 1. Continue to September 13, 1994: a. Lot 31, Bonnie Brae Addition, Crystal Creek Development/Applicant. b. Lots 15-17, Block 2, Town of Estes Park, Elizabeth Bowers/Applicant. c. Lot 6, Little Prospect Mountain Addition, Geraldine Kappely/Applicant. 4. Resolution #14-94 - Setting public hearing date of September 13, 1994 for New Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License Application filed by George Lee, dba HUNAN RESTAURANT, 450 W. Riverside Dr. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Planning Commission, August 16, 1994: A. Public Hearing: Portion of Lot 31, Manford Addition, Rick Allnutt/Estes Park Orthodontic Center/Applicant. B. Public Hearing: Lot 26, Twin View Addition, Estes Homes, Inc./Applicant. 2. Public Works Committee, July 28, 1994: A. Neighborhood Mail Delivery, Phase II - Award Contract for Cluster Boxes - Budget Expenditure. 3. Public Safety Committee, August 18, 1994: A. Revision to Model Traffic Code - Lexington Lane. 4. Liquor Licenses: A. Transfer of Ownership: Liquor Licensed Drug Store License, From Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park (B. 1 Heffington), to Doug Barton, dba ROCKY MOUNTAIN PHARMACY OF ESTES PARK, 453 E. Wonderview Ave. 5. Stanley Village/Wheeler Management Group, Inc. - Request Town Consent for Optional Redemption of all Bonds Outstanding in Series 1985A Industrial Revenues Bonds. 6. Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority: A. Reappointment of .George J. Hix, 5-year term, expires September 14, 1999 (current term expires September 14, 1994). B. Acknowledge letter submitted by Carl Henderson. 7. Resolution - Settlement Agreement w/Richard Pratt. 8. November Ballot Question: A. Resolution #15-94 - Approving Ballot Question Language. B. Agreement with Larimer County to Conduct Coordinated Election Services. C. Food Tax Refund - Discussion only. 9. Town Administrator's Report: A. Sales Tax Statistics. B. 2 Town of Estes Park, Larimer county, colorado, . AuguIst . . . 19. ?40 Minutes of a . Regular. . . meeting of the Board of Truatees of the Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held in the Municipal Building in said Town of Estes Park on the . 9.ttl .. day of .....AU,[U~t . ., A.D., 19. 94. at regular meeting hour. H. Bernerd Dannels Meeting called to order by Mayor ......................... Present: Mayor Trustees: H. B. Dannels Robert L. Dekker, Mayor ProTem Susan L. Doylen, William J. Marshall, Michael E. Miller, Also Present: Gary F. Klaphake, J. Donald Pauley Town Administrator Gregory A. White, Town Attorney Vickie o'Connor, Town Clerk Absent: Absent: Stephen W. Gillette, Trustee PUBLIC INPUT. Joan Carlton expressed her opposition to various complimentary services given by the Town to the Scottish Festival, stating that the Town was "serving special interests"; noted her disappointment that thus far, the indoor arena has not been constructed; and that horse shows are departing due to increased costs. Ms. Carlton also commented on the designation of a portion of the fairgrounds for the proposed Elk Center. Â£ Mayor Dannels responded that the Board has not made such a designation. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Town Board minutes dated July 26, 1994. 2. Bills. 3. Committee Minutes: A. Special Events, July 28, 1994. B. Public Works, July 28, 1994. C. Community Development, August 4, 1994. D. Board of Adjustment, August 3, 1994 (acknowledgement only). It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Doylen) the consent calendar be approved, and it passed unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 1.A. Long's Peak Scottish Highland Festival. Inc. - Agreement for Use of Fairgrounds. Administrator Klaphake reported that the 5-year Agreement specifies/clarifies operational responsibilities for each party, and it corresponds with the 5-year Agreement Dr. Durward has obtained from the EVRPD. With regard to the subsidization of special events in general, Administrator Klaphake reported that in 1993, the Special Events Committee ranked all special events and created an "Event Decision Model." This model, or priority list, was then applied to the 1994 Budget and was to be utilized in considering future funding. The Committee established the Scottish Festival, Christmas Parade, Rooftop Rodeo, Wool Board of Trustees - August 9, 1994 - Page 2 Market and Rally ' n the Rockies under the "A" priority. Staff will distribute the 1993 analysis and any associated data to all Trustees. Following discussion, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Pauley) the Agreement with the Long's Peak Scottish Highland Festival, Inc. be approved, and it passed unanimously. B. Connie Boschen - Agreement for 1994 Christmas Parade. The Agreement for this Town-sponsored special event is identical to the 1993 Agreement with the exception that Ms. Boschen will be responsible for providing Workers Compensation Insurance. The service fee is $10,000 plus an operating budget of $2,500. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Marshall) the Agreement with I Connie Boschen be approved, and it passed unanimously. The I Trustees commended Ms. Boschen for all the work performed on I the annual Christmas Parades. i 2.A. 1994 Water Line Protect - Accept Bid. Public Works Director Linnane reported that of the three bids received, BT Construction was the low bidder--$141,910. BT constructed large water line projects for the Town in 1988, '91 and '93 and they have an excellent record. The budget is $142,000 and contingencies for potential change orders could be financed from an equipment item for a water plant that will not be purchased in 1994. RMC has been directed to closely monitor this project. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Miller) the low bid in the amount of $141,910 submitted by BT Construction be accepted, and it passed unanimously. B. Utilitv Easement Vacations: (1) Lot 1. Valley Vista Addition. and (2) Block 1. Mountain Golf Villas Subdivision. Director Linnane noted that the Committee recommended approval of both aforementioned easement vacations contingent upon each developer obtaining approval, in writing (routing slip), from , any affected utility agencies (with submittal to staff, plus ~ payment for any Town Attorney fees); staff confirmed that any such approvals have not been submitted. Therefore, no further action was, or will be, taken on Items 1 and 2 pending receipt of the routing slips. 3. New Hotel & Restaurant License. Johnathan & Amv Lvreman. dba COWPOKE CAFE OF ESTES PARK. Mayor Dannels opened the public hearing, and Town Attorney White presented the application. Attorney White acknowledged receipt of a favorable petition containing 18 signatures and Ms. Lyreman presented an I additional favorable petition with 11 signatures. There being ! no further testimony nor communications, Mayor Dannels declared the public hearing closed. Stating that the Board of Trustees finds that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood are not being met by the present liquor outlets in the neighborhood and that the desires of the adult inhabitants are for the granting of this liquor license, it was moved and seconded (Doylen/Dekker) the Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License for the Cowpoke Cafe of Estes Park be granted, and it passed unanimously. 4. Compensation System Review - Award of Contract. Ass't. Administrator Widmer reported that organizations of the Town' s size and complexity should periodically review their ~ compensation systems for accuracy and compatibility with the market. The Town last had a compensation system review performed in 1988. RFPs were submitted to seven firms and proposals were received from three firms. The review consists of two segments: (1) analysis of the compensation schedule to include recommendation(s); and (2) review of the evaluation form itself. With the assistance of Finance Officer Vavra, the proposals were reviewed and, based upon the fact that one Board of Trustees - August 9, 1994 - Page 3 of the principals in the Lee and Burgess firm previously established the Town's pay system and evaluation form, staff is recommending the contract be awarded to Lee and Burgess Associates of Colorado. Their not-to-exceed price is $7,800 and adequate funding is available from the Contingency Account. Project completion date is November 1, 1994 It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Marshall) the proposal submitted by Lee and Burgess Associates of Colorado, in the not-to-exceed amount of $7,800 be accepted, and it passed unanimously. 5. Park Entrance Estates - Resolution of Intent to Annex--#13-94. Attorney White read the Resolution which sets the public hearing date of September 27, 1994, and refers said annexation to the Planning Commission. Approximately 80% of the land owners have signed Petitions for Annexation. A Special Improvement District for road improvement purposes will be initiated upon filing of a Petition, and said Petition cannot be filed until the effective date of the Annexation Ordinance. The Trustees approved a "Memorandum of Understanding" May 24, 1994 which sets forth conditions of annexation. It was moved and seconded (Dekker/Pauley) Resolution #13-94 be adopted, and it passed unanimously. 6. November Ballot Ouestion: A. Resolution - Draft - For Discussion Only. The Board reviewed a revised copy of a Resolution which will place a ballot question on the November 8, 1994 Ballot. In summary, the ballot question will seek voter approval to collect and retain all revenues in excess of the revenue limitations as contained under TABOR from 1994 through 2003, to be expended for public purposes such as a fire station, open space, sidewalks, trails, landscaping, street and parking lot construction and maintenance, storm drainage, municipal building/facilities, and intergovernmental agreement projects. Trustee Doylen announced that representatives from the YMCA have joined the affordable housing investigation team. The YMCA has not committed any funding at this time, however, they will participate in the concept, development, etc. Administrator Klaphake advised that staff Will "poll" the citizenry on the specific affordable housing site and report poll results to the Trustees. B. Food Tax Refund - Form Review - For Discussion Only. Staff presented the refund form and proposed that the EVRPD boundary area, excluding Boulder County, be considered. The refund formula equates to the Town's local 4% sales tax on groceries and is based upon established low-income guidelines. Staff's aim is to maintain a simplified application process thereby reducing administrative costs. At this time, a budget estimate for this program is $20,000. Administrator Klaphake reported that he had reviewed the proposal with Louis O'Riordan and that Mr. O'Riordan supports the food tax refund concept. Lou Canaiy urged that a stringent application process be instituted to help ensure that only those eligible receive the refund. Mayor Dannels advised that Items 6. A. and B. will be further discussed August 23, 1994. 7. Motion to Enter Executive Session to Discuss Personnel Issues. It was moved and seconded (Doylen/Pauley) the Board adjourn to Executive Session to discuss personnel issues, and it passed Board of Trustees - August 9, 1994 - Page 4 unanimously. There being no further business, Mayor Dannels adjourned the meeting to Executive Session at 8:45 P.M. Mayor Town Clerk EMRADFONDPUILISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee August 18, 1994 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Police Chief Racine, Fire Chief Rumley, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT. Municipal Court Procedures. Administrator Klaphake reported that he has been reviewing the previous history of court cases with Judge Brown, Town Attorney White, Chief Racine and Police Officers relative to municipal court operations. The team is of the opinion that it is now appropriate that most cases be written into municipal court in lieu of Loveland County Court. This policy change should provide improved access for Estes Park citizens and be more cost effective for the Town. Judge Brown-commented that Estes Park's Municipal Court is becoming very active, and the addition of Lt. Filsinger, who attends all court sessions, is very effective in resolving cases. Court is scheduled every 1st and 3rd Wednesday evening; should the need arise, additional evenings could be scheduled. Administrator Klaphake noted that the 1995 Budget will reflect staff's proposal. Chief Racine commented that this suggestion has obvious benefits to the officers plus far-reaching benefits to the Town, relative to savings in over-time compensation, and the potential ability to expend funds on training, equipment, etc. With regard to the Budget, Judge Brown urged the Town consider budgeting funds for support programs. Sentencing for minors currently includes substantial fines and/or community service; Judge Brown prefers alternative awareness programs (ie: substance abuse counseling). There being no further discussion, the Committee directed the Police Department to amend their current policy and, with reasonable exceptions due to special circumstances, summons be hereby written into the Estes Park Municipal Court. Northbound Lexington Lane. In a letter written to Chief called attention to an existing traffic problem at the corner Racine, Marshall and Carole Hesler, 1065 Lexington Lane, of Lexington Lane and "northbound" Lexington Lane. The Heslers requested a stop sign (or at least a yield sign) be installed on said intersection. Public Works Director Linnane reported that he and Chief Racine conducted an on-site inspection. Prior to the installation of a stop sign, it must first meet established criteria as contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (where one or more of the following occur): the application of the normal right-of- way is unduly hazardous, a street enters a through-street, and a combination of high speed, restricted view and serious traffic accident record. Upon a site inspection, staff verified a 9% through-street slope, which, during icy road conditions, does create a hazard; also verified was a site distance of less than 50'. This 50' site distance is BRADFORIPUSLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - August 18, 1994 - Page 2 adversely affected by a thick grove of trees. In addition, if the road were located in a new subdivision, a stop sign would be installed to meet MUTCD standards. A review of accidents in the past 18-month period revealed five accidents in the area and 2 at this intersection which were attributable to grade and restricted view. The Committee recommends a stop sign be installed at the corner of Lexington Lane and "northbound" Lexington Lane, with the "northbound" Lexington Lane" being the stop point. The Committee applauded Mr. and Mrs. Hesler for bringing this situation to the Town's attention. FIRE DEPARTMENT. Hazardous Material (haz-mat). Chief Rumley requested this time be continued to the October meeting as the Department has not received pricing information. Fire Station Study. Chief Rumley reported on a meeting held with Fire Chief Minor and his representatives from the Loveland Fire Department. The representatives were instrumental in the design and construction of their Fire Station #4, and they shared information, including direction on where funding could be preserved. Pursuant to this meeting, the Department researched the ISO rating given the Town and measured a 2-mile radius to help plan and project growth relative to future fire stations. Station #3 was identified in the Fish Creek/Carriage Hills area, and Station #4 was cited in the Windcliff/YMCA area. In addition, an incident map was prepared and presented that identified incidents from 1989 through July, 1994. By means of colored markings, structure fires, fire-related calls that did not include a structure, medicals, and haz-mat spills were identified. Fire Stations 4 and 5 would be 2-bay satellite structures. Concerning the current study, Thorp Associates prepared a conceptual floor plan which was reviewed by the Committee. The plan contains five bays across and 2 deep with doors at each end to avoid backing movements, training room, reception area, offices, two restrooms--one with a shower, medical supplies, apparatus bays which would be isolated from the general public, storage and parking. The Fire Department is currently reviewing the floor plan and forwarding their suggestions to Mr. Thorp. The fire station will be a metal- frame structure with veneer, landscaping and an entry feature. Staff noted that the potential relocation of the existing fire hall and those of the future areÂ·prime examples of the reasoning behind the Town seeking approval to retain its excess sales tax dollars (TABOR). Additional information on the Fire Station Study will be forthcoming. REPORTS. The Committee reviewed the correspondence summary for April-August, 1994. An article entitled "Crime Decreases in 1993" published in the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin was presented--according to preliminary Uniform Crime Reporting figures, the number of serious crimes reported to law enforcement agencies decreased 3% in 1993. ....FORD.U.LISHâ€¢NG'o. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee - August 18, 1994 - Page 3 The Monthly Reports were unavailable at this time; however, they will be distributed to the Committee in the near future. Staff commended the summer traffic officers for jobs well done this season. Chief Racine anticipates the majority of these officers will return in 1995. There being no further business, Chairman Gillette adjourned the meeting at 8:43 A.M. 0 kligui cE) f ,ik~Â«LA-/ Vickie O'Connor, CMC, Town Clerk BRADFORDPUBLISHINGCO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ** REVISED Item 2.D. Planning Commission Brookside Sub. - added "finding" to motion. August 16, 1994 Commissioners: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Gary Cooper, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Burgess, Cooper, A. Hix, and Pohl Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: Commissioners Brown and Thomas Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. 1. MINUTES. Minutes of the July 19, 1994 were approved as submitted. 2. SUBDIVISIONS. 2.A. Preliminary Plat. Sleepy Hollow Subdivision. Fall River Road. Gary D. Connelly/Applicant. (Continued from July 19. 1994.) Due to unresolved easement issues, Kerry Prochaska, Applicant's representative, requested action on this plat be continued to the next meeting. The site is served by an existing travelled way from Highway 34, through the Trails West and Blackhawk properties. Mr. Wallace, Blackhawk Lodges, requested a 100% guarantee that the Town would not change this easement, which is his parking area, to a right-of-way. Public Works Director Linnane explained that, in general, the Town would only pursue a right-of-way at the request of the property owners. Jim Tawney, Ponderosa Lodge, stated that he owns the northern half of the roadway, and he has not been contacted by Mr. Connelly. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix- Burgess) the Preliminary Plat of Sleepy Hollow Subdivision be continued to September 20, 1994, and that approval of this motion does not indicate approval of the future submittal of the preliminary plat, and it passed unanimously. 2.B. Final Plat. Manford Addition. Lot 31, S.W. Corner of Graves & Community Drive, Estes Park Orthodontic Center. Rick Allnutt/Applicant. Applicant's representative Paul Kochevar stated this location is zoned commercial-outlying. Applicant proposes to divide the existing lot into two lots. All utilities are available to these proposed lots. Community Development Director Stamey stated his concern that Lot 1 may not be large enough to accommodate the proposed development. The working site plan submitted to Staff indicates conflicts with driveway separation, density, and number of parking spaces. It was moved and seconded (Hix-Pohl) the Final Plat, Manford Addition, Lot 31, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions, and that approval of this lot split in no way implies approval of the working site plan, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note to be placed on the plat limiting access to Graves Avenue. 2. A drainage easement be provided. 3. The dedication statement be changed per Town Attorney. BRADFORO PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 16, 1994 - Page 2 4. Petition to be included in Upper Thompson Sanitation District. 2.C. Bonnie Brae Addition. Community Drive and Brodie Avenue. Replat of Lot 31, Crystal Creek Development/Applicant. Applicant's representative Paul Kochevar stated the Applicant wishes to divide Lot 31, which is presently zoned R-M Multiple Family, into 8 separate single-family lots, 18,006 to 18,181 square feet each. Access to the lots is from two private access easements. A utility and drainage easement is reserved that includes all areas outside the building envelopes on all lots, unless otherwise noted. It was moved and seconded (Cooper-Burgess) the Replat of Lot 31, Bonnie Brae Addition be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions, and it passed unanimously: 1. Remove the term "typical" from the final plat. 2. Add to the plat a maintenance agreement note for the private drives. 3. Separate utility service lines for each lot. 4. Petition to be included in the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. 5. Drainage outflow directed around the building envelope south of Lot 1 and placed in a swale, with the detail shown on the street plan, and a drainage maintenance agreement note added to the plat. 6. The dedication statement be modified. Mr. Kochevar stated Applicant will comply with these items. 2.D. Final Plat. Lot 26. Twin View Addition (Brookside Sub- division). Fish Creek Road & Brook Drive. Estes Homes. Inc./ Applicant. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's representative, stated the 5.1 acre lot is presently vacant and zoned R-S Residential. Lots 1-8 were proposed for single-family dwellings; Lot 9 was proposed for a duplex. After discussion, it was concluded the proposed density complies with the zoning of this property. Cluster boxes will be located in the center of the cul-de-sac. Wetlands are identified and acceptable monumentation placed. Director Stamey read a letter of opposition from Tom Blaue, which included the following concerns: environmental impact, need, and traffic impact. It was moved and seconded (Burgess-A. Hix) the Final Plat for Twin View Addition, Lot 26 be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, with the finding that the open space outlot is determined to be of special importance because of value for animal habitats, wildlife migration corridors, or scenic resource preservation, and contingent upon the following conditions being met prior to the Board meeting, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note be placed on the final plat stating that the wetlands be maintained in their natural condition with no excavation, fill, or disturbance permitted. , 2. Homeowners' covenants be provided that addresses the preservation and maintenance of the open space. 3. Dimensions be added to the building envelopes on the final plat and the "typical" note deleted. BRA'FORIPUBLISHING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 16, 1994 - Page 3 4. An agreement with the Applicant and Gerald Palmer regarding water line reimbursement be signed. 5. A 6-inch water main be extended to the west property line. The cul-de-sac water main be 8 inches in diameter. The existing 2-inch water main is located farther west than shown. 6. Provide water main construction plans. 5. Drainage easements dedicated through Lots 9 and 7. 7. The hike/bike path easement be extended to Brook Drive. 8. Final road design be based on soil study. Vegetation next to the roadway be re-established. 9. An improvement guarantee and letter of credit is required prior to Town Board approval. 10. The developer provide a street light at the intersection of Brook Drive & Brook Court. 11. The property be included within the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. 12. The "Restricted Industrial" zoning note include the words "with an existing industrial use on adjacent lot". 2.E. Replat of Lot 2, Tanton Subdivision. It was moved and seconded (Pohl-Burgess) the Replat Of Lot 2, Tanton Subdivision be continued to the September 20, 1994 meeting, and it passed unanimously. 2.F. Amended Plat. Town of Estes Park. Lots 15. 16. & 17. Block 2. 101 E. Elkhorn Avenue (Hupp Hotel). Elizabeth Bowers/Applicant. Applicant's representative Bill Van Horn stated this area is zoned C-D Commercial Downtown, and the Applicant is proposing to combine the three lots into two. Because of concerns voiced by Estes Park Sanitation District, Applicant will do a specific locate for the service line for Lot 27, which appears to flow under the buildings on Lots 15, 16, and 17, and provide an easement describing its location. Ernie Petrocine, Western Brands, expressed concern regarding the status of the access, sewer, and water easements. Encroachments of the existing building and possible solutions were discussed at length. Chairman Sager reported on safety concerns expressed by Police Chief Racine regarding the building encroachment into the right-of-way. Chairman Sager is opposed to any change in the property until the encroachment issue has been resolved. It was moved and seconded (A. Hix-Pohl) the Amended Plat, Town of Estes Park, Lots 15, 16, and 17, Block 2, 101 E. Elkhorn Avenue, combining the three lots into two be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions being met prior to Town Board approval, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note on the plat that acceptance of this amended plat does not approve the encroachments of the buildings on the west side of the property into Big Horn Drive. 2. A drainage and access easement be provided in the open area between the two buildings. BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Planning Commission - August 16, 1994 - Page 4 3. A maintenance agreement note be added to the plat that a sanitary sewer/storm sewer cleanout exists in this area. 4. A drainage maintenance agreement note be added to the plat that a drainage problem exists along Big Horn Drive due to the building and landscape encroachments. 5. Each building be separately metered by 3/4" water meters. , 6. Access easement be provided across Lots 15A and 16A, 20 feet wide, which incorporates the existing travelled way. 7. Applicant to install a curb and 3-foot walkway along Big Horn and be responsible for maintenance. 8. An easement be provided for the sewer line from Lot 27, or said line be relocated. The Planning Commission also requested that Town Attorney White comment on the Town's ability to require removal of the building encroachment. 2.G. Final Plat. Lot 6. Little Prospect Mountain Addition. 137 Stanley Circle Drive. Geraldine Kappely/Applicant. The Applicant proposes dividing an existing lot, zoned R-S one and two family, into two lots of 1.44 and 1.29 acres. Existing land use is one single family dwelling on Lot 6A; Lot 6B is vacant. With one exception, development that has occurred in the Little Prospect Mountain area has been single family. In order to maintain compatibility, a note should be placed on the plat which limits use of each lot to one single family dwelling. Mr. Van Horn stated that the existing driveway curb cut would be used and such to be added to the plat, and that both lots would be connected to Estes Park Sanitation District service. It was moved and seconded (Burgess-Cooper) the Kappely Subdivision of Lot 6, Little Prospect Mountain Addition be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions being met prior to Town Board approval, and it passed unanimously: 1. Single family use note be added to the plat. 2. If driveway access is shared, a maintenance agreement note be added to the plat. 3. Overhead utility lines relocated at owner expense. 4. Submit additional drawings showing the intent to connect both properties to Estes Park Sanitation District. CONCERNS Commissioner Burgess expressed concern regarding the unresolved U- Haul situation at 551 S. St. Vrain Avenue; no action was taken. There being no further business, Chairman Sager adjourned the meeting at 11:12 a.m. A. U. -v- /LÂ«c/2 C '' 6/ Le Tina Kuehl, Deputy Town Clerk RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: That the filing date of the application for a New Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License, filed by George Lee, dba HUNAN RESTAURANT, 460 W. Riverside Drive, Estes Park, Colorado, is August 12, 1994. It is hereby ordered that a public hearing on said application shall be held in the Board Room of the Municipal Building, 170 MacGregor Avenue, on Tuesday, September 13, 1994 at 7:30 P.M., and that the neighborhood boundaries for the purpose of said application and hearing shall be the area included within a radius of 3.07 miles, as . measured from the center of the applicant' s property. ADOPTED: BRADFOID PUILIIHING CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ** REVISED Item 2.D. Planning Commission Brookside Sub. - added August 16, 1994 "finding" to motion. Commissioners: Chairman Al Sager, Commissioners Mark Brown, Harriet Burgess, Gary Cooper, Alma Hix, Edward Pohl and David Thomas Attending: Chairman Sager, Commissioners Burgess, Cooper, A. Hix, and Pohl Also Attending: Community Development Director Stamey, Deputy Clerk Kuehl Absent: Commissioners Brown and Thomas Chairman Sager called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. J. MINUTES. Minutes of the July 19, 1994 were approved as submitted. SUBDIVISIONS. Graves & Community Drive. Estes Park Orthodontic Center. Rick lhAR Final Plat. Manford Addition. Lot 31. S.W. Corner of Allnutt/Applicant. Applicant's representative Paul Kochevar stated this location is zoned commercial-outlying. Applicant proposes to divide the existing lot into two lots. All utilities are available to these proposed lots. Community Development Director Stamey stated his concern that Lot 1 may not be large enough to accommodate the proposed development. The working site plan submitted to Staff indicates conflicts with driveway separation, density, and number of parking spaces. It was moved and seconded (Hix-Pohl) the Final Plat, Manford Addition, Lot 31, be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, contingent upon the following conditions, and that approval of this lot split in no way implies approval of the working site plan, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note to be placed on the plat limiting access to Graves Avenue. 2. A drainage easement be provided. 3. The dedication statement be changed per Town Attorney. 4. Petition to be included in Upper Thompson Sanitation District. ,-Mf Final Plat. Lot 26. Twin View Addition (Brookside Sub- â€¢ Applicant. Paul Kochevar, Applicant's representative, stated division). Fish Creek Road & Brook Drive. Estes Homes. Inc./ the 5.1 acre lot is presently vacant and zoned R-S Residential. Lots 1-8 were proposed for single-family dwellings; Lot 9 was proposed for a duplex. After discussion, it was concluded the proposed density complies with the zoning of this property. Cluster boxes will be located in the center of the cul-de-sac. Wetlands are identified and acceptable monumentation placed. Director Stamey read a letter of opposition from Tom Blaue, which included the following concerns: environmental impact, need, and traffic impact. It was moved and seconded (Burgess-A. Hix) the Final Plat for Twin View Addition, Lot 26 be favorably recommended to the Board of Trustees, with the finding that the open space outlot is determined to be of special importance because of value for animal habitats, wildlife migration corridors, or scenic resource preservation, and contingent upon the following conditions being met prior to the Board meeting, and it passed unanimously: 1. A note be placed on the final plat stating that the wetlands be maintained in their natural condition with no excavation, fill, or disturbance permitted. 2. Homeowners' covenants be provided that addresses the preservation and maintenance of the open space. 3. Dimensions be added to the building envelopes on the final plat and the "typical" note deleted. 4. An agreement with the Applicant and Gerald Palmer regarding water line reimbursement be signed. 5. A 6-inch water main be extended to the west property line. The cul-de-sac water main be 8 inches in diameter. The existing 2-inch water main is located farther west than shown. 6. Provide water main construction plans. 5. Drainage easements dedicated through Lots 9 and 7. 7. The hike/bike path easement be extended to Brook Drive. 8. Final road design be based on soil study. Vegetation next to the roadway be re-established. 9. An improvement guarantee and letter of credit is required prior to Town Board approval. 10. The developer provide a street light at the intersection of Brook Drive & Brook Court. 11. The property be included within the Upper Thompson Sanitation District. 12. The "Restricted Industrial" zoning note include the words "with an existing industrial use on adjacent lot". MEMORANDUM DATE: August 19, 1994 TO: TOWN BOARD (PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE) FROM: Greg Sievers RE: 1994 N.D.C.B.U. INSTALLATION Phase Il The 1994 budget contains $23,000 for the construction and installation of neighborhood delivery cluster box units. Bids packages were supplied to four local concrete contractors. Three declined to bid, due to heavy work loads. One bid was received from Cornerstone Concrete/Bob Pavlish. Their unit prices remained the same from Phase I , with a construction total of $13,410. Public Works staff conducted neighborhood meetings to confirm the locations of the nine NBU sites. The attached map identifies the nine sites which will be constructed prior to October 1, 1994. The 1993 Phase I produced 636 mail slots and this Phase will produce an additional 396 (minimum). Staff requests your authorization to accept the bid from Cornerstone Concrete in the amount of $13,410, and Western Mobile Asphalt for $3,300 for a project total of $16,710. We also request to use the remaining money to increase project quantities, including surveying,for a not-to-exceed project value of $23,000. ....11 â€žLEN '1~{2-4,\r~23122~?9~'11~,J 6?sj8%%5g8%mdâ€žvC' --, us wmel-(St= ... r---TE..AC n .... 1. "' 6 -1-â€¢Â·4!~-iF.-AÂ· I /-0,-4--41-4tdlew..' . - - ,Â· :,I : u' : 2 -4,.~.Ji.-9F P-H 7-17~1-64\*LIAr:-,mt,~~rÂ· 1 v ~ b , 0. 1, .1 2 , .Do ImaZm~Al#tr Â· . 1 2 I MOS/*TAL AOBÂ· STANLEY I. 1 -3Â»1>:2-: . S Al, I .00 ......4 - 1, 1 , LA . .. I I . 11 . .. . . ' ~~Aff Â¥044' -011 <0 -1~ __ _ ... . , :. G , ' 6 - , E mimill.&.~:A~.~~. ab-*...fid . r . .00. . ..... .... t: , I'li' .,2.'. - ' 1 ......... . Imr,*M#Em. 67&9=: . u-Â· hurill ,b.Jil- 4'*Er . 4 , ' ' 1 0 1. - VENNER . 5 + ...... I *=JI.,9,=j..4-1. .4Â«93174---- 0 . M- #.O,1 7 '"Â· A 1 , - - I /'. 1 . .,Â·,teiMIF~lel .1.11.-L-1.J 1.- /00, ....04 i /S . Ig - - - 1 el lilli ..1 . 1.0 - SA1 .444&923*)~l2:It!2_ \--4.-1 *- .- Mill- . Vt,ViTBAW+14.1,HYAT;.-E~.. Ar-1 .-4 -*:sq -}ZEC~ . 4 \ loD , I ....... ' C /4 M - 93263,6 1 1 1 \ ' \LUJ-/0-r , %12-,wY. A-'.- In- 1 ~ JAV) ' 2.22â‚¬91 :i 1. . 1 1 " 2 " s ' Fra rÂ· 1***Mbl f I â€¢â€¢dâ€¢,â€¢â€¢ 5â€¢1 2-J t-:-8 L _ I . . U ' 7â€¢4â€¢W, .1 -0-- 1 F- 1. -4.,O.0 1 4 1 -EmU LL!1 ~ 1 1 " - 1 / . 7â€¢ GOLF COURSE .$ 1.. 1 :43 [el" 4 2 , 171 1 . 1 - 0 '\Â« 1994 NDCBU -â€ž. r--2-1 0 . ON OIU 9 LIE:; il - 4 , PROJ~ECT LOCAT[O~*=; r 0 . 7 . l.irisj 1 -'l .1 -i----j}~fi i ~â€ž -.- â€ž- j --r *E- :T- ..... Fl-- ---- ---- 1-,1.-"1 1 6 SCY I . . . .. A 1.1El : .... , 11*.111 1 : 1 liz liz 1 2 . 7 - I . I â€¢ 0 ..0, I I I m . .#L 4 IGHTS .. 1/ . .- 1-4KF=-1 6 .. .. .00. â€¢ i. Ii'sr ...... KNOR I 1 9 1 1 IOUNAIN,61 m . . . 1 1 211. -i 4 7#re 1-____ I , ... I . I ID 1 '. .. . .. 1 1. '. 1.1 C 1 " 1 i is j li -- -- 8. j . I . .. . . 1 5, D. -011-CT ..... .-EKS.DE 1 " 1 I-;-4FY- L..c,mâ€¢ ... . 1 .,1.0. :.r. I M " 1. n PROSPECT ~ â€¢ â€¢ , I . .. .. - ... 145-1 41-IÂ·Â·-11*ifh-â‚¬Lf:..' -2 . / , CLUII 6 .00 .. .. 2â€¢ 1=...4.t Â· EITATESt r-r-l it, . -1- .0.,r,/-4. 1 142_ . VENNER " i , ME'# 5, 1 Al ESTATES , 1 . 4 .0 TRACT i LOT . , 04 - I~II,IIIIA Al ' 0 4! 1-1 S .r. -4- . i i Ir-- n. : , . â€¢ , A ~ ADDITION - .'. , , . Â·rl, 1. , JpTi .,4/yll ~ - ...fi 11 1 1...1. I I Ill .t, u. I 'MI .1.1... .1.1 ..1 1 & I .3,1,0 111 1 1 t. 3. 3.' 00 " C-- I. , , 24, = e: ' . vIEW 'I ; - . "A. --='. 1, . .. , %. . 1 5 . 11 I .1 Â· â€¢ - bl... . -' . 1, - / ;:,1 1.. . E.,4.r 1 PEAK ... ' ..LIâ€¢ / /4 , 4 14 . .... f 4 f . -- W ' INCH . . . . , 1, 90 1 r' ICAC. D.,VR ,:' ESTATE . . 0., , VIEW â€¢ . 7 ts " " s 1 1 ... , .-1. 0.-, 1 3 1 1. 1. ACAC;A .c. i â€ž .... I ". 1 .5 11 1. S a .C.C . .. . llc.. T ... I - 4 Â¥ .... .00 / y 00 . . 1, I , " 4- , 11 1, 36 31 4/ 1 0 . -4 21 | 13 "." J .1./.1 T.aCT L.,/ I ST . 5 4 47 / ._>01 1 '' . 1 . - FF.i-'TZ.01.3.:S .:~ .). W-" f ::" 31 , 'r.- ... , , 1 0 . \V .. \ X.>74 Oy ...CT 2 1 I ' 1, 5 ... r - 6/ ARAN.0 , ~AN -0Â¥ 4 MEADOWS , 7. T... I 2-7 . -_ ' 1 1 ... 11 Vrâ‚¬ I . 1 1.1 /<th - /UPLANCS AT 1. I. h<. . /1 1, t. F . , " I I. 1, 'S ADD TION " . I ' ~* FISH CREEK '0 , . . '< O 1. . . 1. I I . I . I . .0 i,O . V ' 17 /0 1, " 1, u ...ST . c,0 . , , . . . 11 0, .0, '1 I $ I / 1. . . 1. .1 . 10 . . 10 22 I . \ 5 . e. , , I 0 1, e . 18 I. . . .. .. D 2 11 . . . : 4 . 0 '. I . 4 '0 I , . 2. .. ., - 06 7 . M .. I . .. 1, . . I. - ....0, I . .. 1 - ./ . - A-= -7 â€¢ OW.LO, . 0, 1 . -119 . I . â€žâ€žâ€ž I'\ / ... . OUTICT . 2 2 / .U Â·Â· , 21 2 1 , U OV.Lo, . 0 . 1, 11 1. \tz:'lli 1 " CAR A 1AGE ' MILLS ~ " k..z.-2-P-'~L~â€ž " ,â€¢ â€ž i. i , , ISE F.". 1 , 7-4 ........â€¢Ull.HING.0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Public Safety Committee August 18, 1994 Committee: Chairman Gillette, Trustees Dekker and Marshall Attending: All Also Attending: Town Administrator Klaphake, Police Chief Racine, Fire Chief Rumley, Clerk O'Connor Absent: None Chairman Gillette called the meeting to order at 8:00 A.M. POLICE DEPARTMENT. unicipal Court Procedures. Administrator Klaphake repor t t he has been reviewing the previous history of court es Wi Judge Brown, Town Attorney White, Chief Racine an olice Offi rs relative to municipal court operations. T team is of the pinion that it is now appropriate that m cases be written to municipal court in lieu of Lovelan ounty Court. This poli change should provide improved ess for Estes Park citize and be more cost effective f the Town. Judge Brown co nted that Estes Par Municipal Court is becoming very act e, and the additi of Lt. Filsinger, who attends all court ssions, is ve effective in resolving cases. Court is s eduled ev 1st and 3rd Wednesday evening; should the ne arise dditional evenings could be scheduled. Administrator Klaphake no t the 1995 Budget will reflect staff's proposal. Chief acine mmented that this suggestion has obvious benefit to the icers plus far-reaching benefits to the T , relative savings in over-time compensation, and e potential abi to expend funds on training, equipm , etc. With regard o the Budget, Judge Brown urged Town consider budgeting unds for support programs. entencing for minors CU ntly includes substantial ines and/or community servic Judge Brown prefers a rnative awareness programs (ie: su tance abuse counseli . There eing no further discussion, the Committee dire ed the Pol Department to amend their current policy and, with re onable exceptions due to special circumstances, summo be eby written into the Estes Park Municipal Court. Northbound Lexington Lane. In a letter written to Chief Racine, Marshall and Carole Hesler, 1065 Lexington Lane, called attention to an existing traffic problem at the corner of Lexington Lane and "northbound" Lexington Lane. The Heslers requested a stop sign (or at least a yield sign) be installed on said intersection. Public Works Director Linnane reported that he and Chief Racine conducted an on-site inspection. Prior to the installation of a stop sign, it must first meet established criteria as contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (where one or more of the following occur): the application of the normal right-of- way is unduly hazardous, a street enters a through-street, and a combination of high speed, restricted view and serious traffic accident record. Upon a site inspection, staff verified a 9% through-street slope, which, during icy road conditions, does create a hazard; also verified was a site distance of less than 50'. This 50' site distance is adversely affected by a thick grove of trees. In addition, if the road were located in a new subdivision, a stop sign would be installed to meet MUTCD standards. A review of accidents in the past 18-month period revealed five accidents in the area and 2 at this intersection which were attributable to grade and restricted view. The Committee recommends a stop sign be installed at the corner of Lexington Lane and "northbound" Lexington Lane, with the 'â€¢northbound" Lexington Lane" being the stop point. The Committee applauded Mr. and Mrs. Hesler for bringing this situation to the Town's attention. u ~*it *,.< TOWN OF ESTES PARK L by , 9 p Police Department ty#%*r*JE W =4â‚¬0. 720 - - 4 I 1,0<8 ty?m , 4 5.--rL ~49#~4~~.<:47..ile.0Â¥11, =42-/ August 19, 1994 Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park, Inc. d/b/a Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park Liquor Licensed Drug Store BARTON, Gregory K. ESQUIBEL,.Jos& J. Ms. O'Connor: A records check based upon the names and dates of birth of the above named individual(s) has been made. There have been no convictions, nor are there any wants or warrants against them. Therefore, based upon the information received, I would recommend approval of the license for Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park, Inc., d/b/a Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park. Sincerely, r 41 1 kÂ»le 4 A 4. 1 David J. Racine Chief of Police DJR/jo (303) 586-4466 â€¢ RO. BOX 1287 â€¢ ESTES PARK, CO 80517 â€¢ FAX (303) 586-4496 UM 6411 (03/94) LIQUOR LICENSING PROCESSING DOCUMENT COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RETAIL LIQUOR & LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET 3.2% BEER LICENSE FEES DENVER CO 80261 1. Name of Applicant(s) (exactly as it appears on state application) Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park, Inc. 2. Trade Name of Establishment (DBA) Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park 3. Address of Premises (as it appears on the application) 453 E. Wonderview DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE State Sales Tax No Business Phone â€¢ ALL ANSWERS MUST BE PRINTED IN BLACK INK OR TYPE- 10-80000-0000 303-586-5577 WRITTEN City County â€¢ APPLICANT MUST CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) Estes Park Larimer â€¢ LOCAL LICENSE FEE $ State ZIP Code LIAB SECTION D LIQUOR LICENSE FEES Colorado 80517 2300 0 Application Fee for New License ......................... $450.00 2320-750 (999) SECTION A FEES 2310 E Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership .......... 450.00 If applicant has a Beer and Wine, or Malt, Vinous and , 1940 m Retail Liquor Store License (city) ......................... 202.50 Spirituous Liquor License, indicate your state Liquor 31940 E Retail Liquor Store License (county).................... 287.50 1950 Â£ Liquor Licensed Drugstore (city) ......................... 202.50 â€¢ License Account No. 1950 2 Liquor Licensed Drugstore (county).................... 287.50 El Retail Warehouse Storage Permit ..................... $50.00 1960 El Beer & Wine License (city) ................................ 177.50 C] Request to Change, Alter or Modify Premises.... 75.00 01960 C] Beer & Wine License (county) ........................... 262.50 '1970 O H&R License C]city Ocounty...................... 326.25 [3 Addition of Optional Premises to Existing 1980 EH&R License w/opt Prem 2 city m county 326.25 Hotel/Restaurant $50.00 x __ Total Fee 1990 0 Club License C] city E] county ..................... 135.00 El Request to Change Corporate or Trade Name...25.00 2010 2 Tavern License O city D county .................. 326.25 2 Request to Change Location ............................ 100.00 2020 C] Arts License E city E county ...................... 135.00 0 Duplicate License ................................................ 25.00 2030 E Racetrack License E city E county ............ 326.25 Â£ Subpoena Testimony Fees .............................. .100.00 2040 O Optional Premises License m city m county ..... 326.25 (use license no. 21-94214) <1905 2 Retail Gaming Tavern Lic C] city C]county....... 326.25 2110 0 BWS Special Event Permit ............................. each 25.00 2330-750 (999) SECTION B FEE Il Manager's Registration (hotel & restaurant only) .... 75.00 If applicant has a 3.2% Beer Retail license, indicate your , C] Extended Hours ................................................. 170.00 â€¢ state 3.2% License Account No. U Request to Change, Alter or Modify Premises ....... 75.00 [3 Request to Change Corporate or Trade Name...... 25.00 SECnON E 3.2% BEER UCENSE FEES El Request to Change Location ... ............................ 100.00 2300 El Application Fee for New License .......................... $450.00 U Duplicate License 94 nO 2310 El Application Fee for Transfer of Ownership........... 450.00 2121 0 Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (city) ................. 71.25 1970-750 (999) SECTION C FEES 2121 0 Retail 3.2% Beer On Premises - (county) ............ 92.50 2122: El Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (city) ................. 71.25 If applicant has a Hotel/Restaurant liquor license and is 2122 0 Retail 3.2% Beer Off Premises - (county) ............ 92.50 registering a new manager, indicate your state Liquor 2123 j Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (city) .,.......... 71.25 â€¢ License Account No. 2123 D Retail 3.2% Beer On/Off Premises - (county) ...... 92.50 Il Manager's Registration $75.00 2170 2 3.2% Beer Special Event Permit .................... each 10.00 DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE - FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE USE ONLY LIABILITY INFORMAnON County City - 2 Industry Type f *' Uabillty Date License Issued Through , License Account Number (Expiration Date) .t .:'. .' . B: I Fee paid for 3.2% Beer , f Fee paid for Beer, Wine, and Soirituous Liquor - 1 State City 9 9 County, u State City ~ County Managers Reg s ~ TOTAL -750 (999) 2180-100 (969) 2190-100 (999) = -750 (999) 2180-100 (999) 2190-100 (999) 1970-755 (999) 0 * 3 Â» Cash Fund New Ucen- Cah Fund Trans- Ucm- TOTAL Caoh Fund New Ucen- Cish Fund Transfer Ext Hours City Ext Hours County 2300-100 2310-100 i 2300-100 2310-100 2180-100 2190-100 (999) (999) -. * m99). (999) s(999) (999) White Copy - Department of Revenue Canary Copy - Liquor Enforcement Division Pink Copy - Local Authority Goldenrod Copy - Applicant DR 8404 (02/94) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1375 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80261 COLORADO LIQUOR OR 3.2 % FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION 1. Applicant is a Date filed wjth Local Authority tÂ®Sltorporation (Attach DR 8177) ~ Individual (Attach DR 8404-1) 77Â«90 El Partnership (Attach DR 8441) U Limited Liability Company (Attach DR 8405) f4-/22.38?5- F.E.I.N. la. Name of Applicant(s) If partnership, list partners' names (at least two); if corporation, name of corporation Social Security No. Q--03-Â·.0 Â¥\,buu 4 1,4 Pkow- mki Â° f Este-, fc.ck .Eag~-INÂ©. 2. Trade 1*ne of Establishment (DBA) State Sales Tax No. Business Telephone 2.64 ReÂ»~tai,4 Pki-r*&.CÂ·~ 0Â¥ 696Â¢-5 2â€¢,c< 10.9(777,b-â‚¬,~coe 563 Sgu 5.577 3. Address'of Premises (specify exact location of premises) 45.3 r Wo* 4, y i â‚¬4 City . ZIP Code * sl Â¢5 ~4< K County ~ State 4-Q .-4 144 c Â¥- O>i / 905/7 4. Mailing Address (Number and Street) City_gr Town State ZIP Code to 6.4 94 3 E 5 1-4 A r-'4 Colo 8 6 4,7 5. If the premises currently have a liquor or beer license, you MUST answer the following question: Present Trade Name of That Establishment (DBA).61.4, Present State License No. Present Type of License Present Expiration Date 11,10 '1Â£, PA,rm", d gte, /LR /O - 30000 -0000 /960 344" 14, /97* 6. Is tht applicant (including any/of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- Yes No ers or directors if a corporation) or manager under the age of twenty-one years? mÂ® 7. Has the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockhold- ers or directors if a corporation) or manager ever; (a) been denied an alcoholic beverage license? m El (b) had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? 00 (c) had interest in another entity that had an alcoholic beverage license suspended or revoked? MO If you answered yes to 7a, b or c, explain in detail on a separate sheet. 8. Has a liquor license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding two years? If "yes," explain in detail. C K 8a. Has a 3.2 beer license for the premises to be licensed been refused within the preceding one year? If "yes," explain in detail. m El 9. Are the premises to be licensed within 500 feet of any public or parochial school, or the principal campus of any college, university or Elril seminary? 10. Has a liquor or beer license ever been issued to the applicant (including any of the partners, if a partnership; members or manager if a limited liability company; or officers, stockholders or directors if a corporation)? If yes, identify the name of the business and list any 1 El current financial interest in said business including any loans to or from a licensee. 11. Does the Applicant, as listed on line 1 a of this application, have legal possession of the premises for at least 1 year from the date that this license wjll be issued by virtue of ownership or under a lease? (If yes, attach a signed copy of deed or lease.) N El U Ownership M Lease El Other (Explain in Detail) a. If leased, list name of landlord and tenant, and date of expiration, EXACTLY as they appear on the lease: Landlord Tenant . Expires 0/4,ww A w t 12Â°04 h{-1 PUAL# 4 (,4 LK Z-/- 99 Attach a diagram of the area to t/6 licensed (including dimensions) Which shows the bars, wa114 p~itions, entrances, exits and what each room shall be utilized for in this business. This diagram should be no larger than 8 1/2" X 11". (Doesn't have to be to scale) 12. Who has (including persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies) or will loan or give money, inventory, furniture or equipment to or for use in this business; or who will receive money from this business. Attach a separate sheet if necessary. NAME ADDRESS INTEREST 39.si 3 63*0; 6, 1 9 1 Y 64-7'' 1-,A> 7~Â·0't CO 55 2 ~ feA K i .A 846 4 264 2.4,*474 c.a.,S-Al Co 567 Attach c~ies of all notds and security instruments, and any written agreement oMietails of any oral agreement, by which any person (including partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, etc) will share in the profit or gross proceeds of this establishment, and any agreement relating to the business which is contingent or conditional in any way by volume, profit, sales, giving of advice or consultation. 13. Optional Premises or Hotel and Restaurant Licenses with Optional Premises All Optional Premises applicants must attach a copy of the local ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of Optional Premises licenses. Number of separate Optional Premises areas requested C.: DR 8404 (2/94) Page 2 14. Liquor Licensed Drug Store applicants, answer the following: Yes No (a) Does the applicant for a Liquor Licensed Drug Store have a license issued by the Colorado Board of Pharmacy? COPY MUST BE ATTACHED. M El 15. Club Liquor License applicants answer the following and attach DR 8177: (a) Is the applicant organization operated solely for a national, social, fraternal, patriotic, political or athletic purpose and not for pecuniary gain? El El (b) Is the applicant organization a regularly chartered branch, lodge or chapter of a national organization which is operated solely for the object of a patriotic or fraternal organization or society, but not for pecuniary gain? 00 (c) How long has the club been incorporated? (d) How long has applicant occupied the premises (Three years required) to be licensed as a club? 16. Colorado Manufacturer, Wholesaler or Limited Winery applicants, answer the following: (a). Will the applicant store or sell alcoholic beverages at more than one location in Colorado? If "yes," provide the address of each location and explain the activity to be conducted at each location (e.g., warehouse, salesroom, etc.) (Attach DR 8438 for each location) 00 (b) If applicant is a wholesaler, does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. 00 (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a copy; if "no; explain whether one has been applied for. 00 17. Nonresident Manufacturer (3.2% beer or malt liquor) or Importer (3.2% beer, malt, vinous or spirituous liquor) applicants, answer the following: (a) To what Colorado licensed wholesaler do you intend to ship your merchandise? (b) Does or did any owner, partner, shareholder, director, officer, member or manager have any direct or indirect financial interest in a wholesaler, retailer, manufacturer or importer already licensed by the State of Colorado to sell malt, vinous or spirituous liquor? If yes, attach explanation in detail. 0 0 (c) Does the applicant have a valid Federal Basic Permit or Brewers Notice? If "yes," attach a c6py; if "no," explain in detail. 02 1 (d) Are you the primary source of supply in the U.S.? If "no," explain. 00 (e) Are all your products registered in Colorado? If "no," attach DR 8440 and register said products. m El 18. Name of Manager (If this is an application for a Hotel and Restaurant License, the manager must also submit a Manager Registration Form Date of Birth (DR 8367) and Individual History Record (DR 84044). ll-7-45 G te- G B k .1-h O OATH OF APPLICANT tr I declare under penalty of perjury in the second degree that this application and all attachments are true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge. AuthorizeG Signature - Title /0/ 73 7-q 4 44/9 MAL,2 1 Aug - REPORTAND APPROVAL OF LOCALILICENSING AUTHORITY: ,; 2 i:i (Manufacturers, nonresident manufacturers, importers, wholesalers,Â¥limited wineries, and public transportation licensees ~ disregard the section below.) $. b Is this application for a: U New License ,~ Transfer of Ownership U Other (specify) Each person required to file DR 8404-I: Yes No Has been fingerprinted Background, NCIC and CCIC checked E. The liquor licensed premises is ready for occupancy and has been inspected by the Local Licensing Authority. 0 0 If "no," the building will be completed and ready for inspection by (date) The foregoing application has been examined; and the premises, business to be conducted, and character of the applicant are satisfactory. We do report that such license, if granted, will meet the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the inhabitants, and will comply with the provisions of Title 12, Article 46 or 47, C.R.S. THEREFORE, THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. Local Licensing Authority for U TOWN, CITY U COUNTY Signature Title Date Signature (attest) Title Date If premises are located within a town or city, the above approval should be signed by the mayor and clerk, if in a county, then by the chairman of the board of county commissioners and the clerk to the board. If, by ordinance or otherwise, the local licensing authority is some other official, then such approval should be given by such official. *- 1 In / 1 7 9 1/1,~..c~ Cr.,0Â¢f? Z<--* -*-p tf'7 UV-Â«~j 8.6* C.d . 43- Se--9-#,e-,VAUP. c- jÂ» f-~,-v-Q- &4 . Mi- ~+~.-,~La-> ez-_e-~f-- 0~6_c_ 22 . ~ 569 ' r l .0 /O, 4/ZFHAI/ 5 â€¢,AU--,-24 c.,4,-=-'209 /1/~-1--t /%2542 4- -ft- CO U M i f -fi /4 9 9 , 52 /0'0 82:Â» t-Q-4 lfLO,tre- .0.----9/ - 4-L ~..4 <~-~2 3-01 - c.--ve U.Ge=â‚¬ tÂ« /- - )* 4*~ 76_ Roe 4 &-f. 49_ wi 2/7- 1 0 4, 6,- 1 T- *- c,ZFC-0.---ce--, 1-17-4Â¢ 1-0 c Al, Acr--A- f k ax-- c.-t.* â‚¬ E-*Â£2. /Le, Ac 4 41 r L.E~ Fs t-Â«' L *c-*- y i Â»uA.-o U;Q WÂ·Â·24 0(ke. E o &662 â‚¬ f t 6.-3....L ~ , 0- L/"re- com-Â« Of Jette p Â£&42 t.0 /1Â£- ~.2-.~' 4 4'tk- w L -4ZZ-~ A. 01 L,-4 U P Lax,-.-- MT. w t a.u- reÂ»2- - b Y r#-zk1 i -Â£62- L.f f 162Â»,â‚¬Gv~ fâ€¢--'.' Â£a-Â¥UL,L ge---F .e_062--Â· e Ff f 6- 4,1-#c 04<c.t)> 1,Â·Â·Â·Â·, *.r AA k.O to-0 L 4 44 LAT'~*1 24 Â»& *L Â«1> 9 cuÂ·f r-u-JE 7 1 bu e 2 -Stpr- a# t. Act* R ENCIES.; fh,Il. 1$0 C l# - 0;RECTOR DIVISON OF REGISTRAVONS u-,â€¢~-4 2-MAA LU OUDit SIGNATURE t AUG 1 5 1994 ~HFFLER }EMKNAGEMENT *ROLE INC August 12, 1994 Vicky O'Connor Clerk and Recorder Town of Estes Park P.O. Box 1200 Estes Park, CO 80517 RE: Town of Estes Park, CO Industrial Revenue Bonds Series 1985A Dear Ms. O'Connor: I would like to request an optional redemption of all bonds outstanding in Series 1985A on November 1, 1994. We have prepaid the loan and funds are being held at First Federal Savings in Denver. The redemption price for this date should be 0%. As we need written consent from the town of Estes Park to give to the Trustee, please put us on the agenda for the Town Council meeting being held on August 23,1994. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, A " 1 O*u tb 9-ledkel John D. Wheeler Stanley Commercial Development, Ltd. TELECON w/Dan Wheeler 8/15 The Trustee does not require an ordinance from the Town; a written approval will suffice. V. O'Connor Greelev 303/352-5860 812 8th Street Plaza -*v4-303/897-1918_ t>11.-4 4 Greeley, CO 80631 LEort Collins ,303/223-7884 3. ~5*~J COUAL MO';5:/0 FmHA FAX 303/352-0117 0222 G....TU/:TY however the amount to be applied to the redemption of Bonds pursuant to this paragraph shall be derived solely from, and limited to Available Moneys. (h) On the First and Third Remarketing Dates, if the Trustee shall not have received all documents necessary to establish, to the satisfaction of the Trustee, an adjustment to the Letter of Credit and Pledge Agreement to take into account the Reset Rate' to take effect on such Remarketing Date, all of the Outstanding Bonds shall be redeemed or purchased, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to such Remarketing Date, from moneys drawn under the Letter of Credit, in accordance with the provisions of Article IV hereof. For purposes of this paragraph, notice of redemption shall be deemed to have been properly given if given pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.07 hereof, notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture. Section 3.02. Optional Redemption. (a) The Bonds shall be subject to optional redemp- tion by the Issuer, in whole or in part, the Developer prepays the Loan on an optionals basis pursuant to the Agreement and with the consent of the Bank, on any Interest Payment Date beginning on November 1, 1991, at a redemption price, which includes a premium, equal to the following percentages of the principal amount thereof: Redemption Dates Redemption Price November 1, 1991 and May 1, 1992 103% November 1, 1992 and May 1, 1993 102 November 1, 1993 and May 1, 1994 101 November 1, 1994 and thereafter 100 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture, any premium paid on the Bonds shall only be paid from moneys constituting Available Moneys deposited to the Revenue Fund pursuant to the terms of Section 6.06(a) (i) by the Developer. Neither monies from a draw on the Letter of Credit, investment of Funds, nor any other funds shall be used to pay any such premium. Section 3.03. Selection of Bonds to Be Redeemed. If less than all the Bonds shall be called for redemption under any provision of this Indenture permitting such partial -25- CARL HENDERSON CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT Member of A Professional Corporation Member of American Institute Colorado Society of of Certified Public Accountants Certified Public Accountants August 17, 1994 Bernie Dannels, Mayor Town of Estes Park Estes Park, CO 80517 Dear Sir: I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that I will not be available for reappointment to the Urban Renewal Board for an additional term. I have most enjoyed the people and the projects that I have had an opportunity to be associated with during the this term. The Town and EPURA staffs have done a remarkable job and their dedication is to be commended. Thank you for the opportunity to serve on the EPURA Board and hopefully in the future I will have the time and lack of other commitments that will allow me to serve in the public sector again. Very truly, 5455 NORTH ST. VRAIN HWY RO. BOX 4515 â€¢ ESTES PARK, COLORADO 80517 â€¢ (303) 586-5008 SENT BY:HAMMOND CLARK WHIT ; 8-19-94 1:29PM ; 6699380-0 303 586 6909;# 2 RESOLUTION NO. - WHEREAS, on or about October 1, 1993, an action wu initiated in the United State: District Court for the District of Colorado, styled Bichard Lynn Pratt v. Cablt Satcms. Ing.lke Towiigf Estes Park. H. Bernerd Dannels. Roben L. Dekker. Susan L DelpAStephen W. Gillette. DIvid F. Habecker. Gearge J. Hil Gag Klaohke. Gre=v A. Whik. andllidhad Widmer. Cue No. 93-S-2090; and WHEREAS, the partles to that lawsuit have reached..ttlement which providi b the disminal with prejudice of the litigation; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Town of Estes Park hu determined that it is in the best interest of the Town to enter into the aforementioned Settlement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OFTRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: 1. The Settlement Agreement between and among the aforementioned pardei which settles the above-referenced lawsuit as more fully set forth on Exhibit A is hereby approved. The Town accept: the condition of the Settlement Agreement which provides for Cable Sy*tems, Ino., the entity which provides cable television service to the Town of Estes Park pursuant to a permit agreement, to designate one of its channels for public access. ft,t . ........ ., f. - - 1 The appropriate omcials of the Town of Estes Park are hereby authorized to emaute aid Settlement AirÂ®ement Adopted thi day of August, 1994, TOWN OF ErIES PARK Mayor ATTEST. To.m aerk 2 E #:6069 986 Â£02 90826699 : Wd62:I t,6-6 I -8 5 1 I HM Mblt,13 aNOWWMH ; Ag iNBS RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION SUBMITTING TO THE REGISTERED ELECTORS OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK AT THE REGULAR GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1994, THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK AND THE ESTES PARK URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT AND RETAIN ALL OF THE REVENUES IN EXCESS OF THE REVENUE LIMITATIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION GENERATED DURING 1994 AND EACH SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEAR THROUGH 2003 FROM SALES AND USE TAXES (WITHOUT ANY INCREASE IN SALES AND USE TAX RATES), INTEREST EARNINGS, REVENUES FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS, FRANCHISE, LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES, MUNICIPAL COURT REVENUES, AND ALL OTHER REVENUES RECEIVED DURING 1994 AND EACH SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEAR THROUGH 2003, AND TO EXPEND SUCH REVENUES FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN AND THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO MULTI-YEAR INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS TO IMPLEMENT THIS MEASURE UPON APPROVAL BY THE ELECTORS. WHEREAS, the Colorado Constitution and applicable law authorize the Town of Estes Park to refer the question herein to a vote of the registered electors of the Town of Estes Park; and WHEREAS, a regular general election of the State of Colorado will be held on November 8, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is of the opinion that it is in the best interests of the citizens of Estes Park that all revenues in excess of the revenue limitations of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution generated during 1994 and each subsequent fiscal year through 2003 from its sales and use taxes (without any increase in sales and use tax rates), interest earnings, revenues from other governments, franchise, license and permit fees, Municipal Court revenues, and all other revenues received during 1994 and each subsequent fiscal year through 2003 should be collected by the Town and expended for capital projects such as: Fire Station, Open Space, Sidewalks, Trails, Landscaping, Street and Parking Lot Construction and Maintenance, Storm Drainage, Municipal Buildings/Facilities, and Intergovernmental Agreement Projects. WHEREAS, although the Board has been advised that it is not legally certain whether the issue of the retention and expenditure of excess sales and use tax incremental revenues (without any increase in sales and use tax rates) utilized by the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority for downtown projects must be submitted to the voters, the Board is of the opinion that it is in the best interest of the citizens to vote on such question; and WHEREAS, the retention and expenditure of such sales and use tax incremental revenues by the Authority would be for the continuation o f downtown redevelopment proj ects, as required in the redevelopment plan approved by this Board, and in compliance with intergovernmental agreements between the Town and the Authority; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO: 1. At the regular general election of the State of Colorado held on Tuesday, November 8, 1994, there shall be submitted to the vote of the registered electors of the Town of Estes Park, the question of whether all revenues generated and received in excess of the revenue limitation of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution from sales and use taxes (without an increase in sales and use tax rates), interest earnings, revenues from other governments, franchise, license and permit fees, Municipal Court revenues, and all other revenues received during 1994 and each subsequent fiscal year through 2003 should be collected by the Town of Estes Park and expended for capital projects such as: Fire Station, Open Space, Sidewalks, Trails, Landscaping, Street and Parking Lot Construction and Maintenance, Storm Drainage, Municipal Building/Facilities, and Intergovernmental Agreement Projects. 2. Such increase in revenues from 1994 and each subsequent fiscal year through 2003 is to be in excess of any revenue limit otherwise applicable, without limiting the collection, retention or expenditure of any other revenues or funds by the Town of Estes Park and/or the Estes Park Urban Renewal Authority under Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution or any other law. 3. The registered electors qualified to vote shall be those so qualified in compliance with applicable law. 4. The ballot question election referred to the electors shall be held in compliance with applicable law. 5. At said election, the ballot issue, including absentee ballots, shall state the substance of the question to be voted upon and so stated shall constitute the ballot title, designation and submission clause. Each registered elector voting at the election shall indicate his or her choice on the question submitted, which will be in the following form: SHALL THE TOWN OF ESTES PARK, COLORADO AND THE ESTES PARK URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT AND RETAIN ALL OF THE REVENUES IN EXCESS OF THE REVENUE LIMITATIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION GENERATED IN 1994 AND EACH SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEAR THROUGH 2003 FROM SALES AND USE TAXES -2- (WITHOUT ANY INCREASE IN SALES AND USE TAX RATES), FRANCHISE, LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES, MUNICIPAL COURT REVENUES, INTEREST EARNINGS, REVENUES FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS, AND ALL OTHER REVENUES; AND TO EXPEND ALL SUCH REVENUES FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS SUCH AS A FIRE STATION, OPEN SPACE, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, LANDSCAPING, STREET AND PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE, STORM DRAINAGE, MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS/FACILITIES, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT PROJECTS; SUCH INCREASES IN REVENUE IN EACH FISCAL YEAR TO BE IN EXCESS OF APPLICABLE REVENUE LIMITS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION; AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN AND THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO MULTI-YEAR INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH CAPITAL PROJECTS? YES NO 6. If a majority of the qualified voters, in compliance with applicable law, approve the question, the measure shall be deemed passed and effective as of the date of certification of the election. 7. Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk, is hereby appointed as the designated election official for the Town of Estes Park and Tina Kuehl is hereby appointed to be her successor in case Vickie O'Connor is unable to serve in said capacity. 8. Public notice of the election on the ballot question hereby submitted shall be given in compliance with applicable laws, including but not limited to publication of notice of election, mailing applicable notices to all registered electors, and mailing and assembling of comments concernin@ the ballot issue, as provided by law. 9. The designated election official and other officials and officers of the Town of Estes Park are hereby authorized to immediately begin negotiations for an appropriate intergovernmental agreement with the Clerk and Recorder, Larimer County, Colorado, in -3- order to participate with said Clerk and Recorder in the holding of a coordinated election as provided by law. 10. The Board of Trustees, designated election official and officials and officers of the Town of Estes Park are authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or appropriate to cause the aforementioned ballot issue to be placed upon the ballot, and to effectuate the provisions of this referred measure upon approval by the electorate. Adopted this day of , 1994. TOWN OF ESTES PARK Mayor ATTEST: -4- AGREEMENT CONCERNING COORDINATED ELECTION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made effective this day of , 19 , between the Larimer County, Colorado Clerk and Recorder ("Clerk") and ("Public Entity"), WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the Public Entity desires to conduct an election pursuant to its statutory authority and a coordinated election is required pursuant to C.R.S. Â§1-7-116(1); such election to occur on November 8 , 1994 ; and WHEREAS, an agreement concerning the conduct of a coordi- nated election is required pursuant to C.R.S. Â§1-7-116(2); and WHEREAS, the Clerk has agreed to perform certain coordinated election services set forth herein in consideration of the performance by the Public Entity of its obligations and payment of a fee as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. DUTIES OF THE CLERK The clerk agrees to perform the following duties (or such other duties as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties in writing) in connection with the election to be held on November 8 , 1994 : A. coordinate the proper number and location of precincts. B. provide a list of election judges to the Public Entity. C. certify the judges of the election and alternate judges and determine their compensation. D. contract for printed ballots, ballot pages for vot- omatics (or other voting machines) and Election Book- lets. E. secure and provide polling places for each election precinct and submit a copy of the list of confirmed polling places to the Public Entity. F. arrange for the delivery and installation of precinct polling place signs no less than 10 days prior to the election. G. arrange for the delivery of the necessary number of vote recorder machines for each designated polling place, ensure that said vote recorder machines are in proper mechanical working order, and pick up said vote recorder machines following the election, except those stored permanently in facilities owned or under the control of the Public Entity. H. be responsible for the delivery of the registration/ signature card lists and assist on or before Election Day in the assembling of all election materials to be delivered to the judges of election in each precinct. I. conduct a training session for election judges which will be held at a mutually agreeable date and location prior to the election, provide specific instruction in the "use and operation" of the vote recorder machines at such training session, and provide a reproducible copy of the election judges' guide for distribution to the judges. J. provide properly trained personnel on the day before Election Day, Election Day, and Election Night for the preparation and conduct of the election. K. provide as needed ballot boxes, transfer cases, and necessary seals to ensure the security of the ballots for each polling place, a quantity of security enve- lopes per polling place as requested, one pad of demon- stration ballots per polling place, one demonstration vote recorder per polling place, and necessary signs for posting. L. provide forms for application for change of address, and/or change of name, voter challenge forms, and voter assistance affidavits. M. provide for necessary electronic voting tabulating equipment (computer), personnel properly trained in electronic tabulating equipment, facility and equip- ment, and arrange for computer running time as neces- sary for a test run and for election day. N. provide all expendable precinct polling place supplies, i.e., name tags, pens, etc. 0. give assistance and information to. the designated local election official of the Public Entity on any, matter which should ensure the smooth and efficient operation 2 of the election (such information not to include legal advice). P. mail to all registered voters in Larimer County the Amendment 1 Notice Package/Election Booklet between fifteen to twenty-five days before the election. The Clerk shall determine the "least cost" method for mailing the Amendment 1 Notice Package and address the package to "All Registered Voters" at each address of one or more active registered voters of the Public Entity. Nothing herein shall preclude the Clerk from sending the Amendment 1 Notice of the Public Entity to persons other than electors of the Public Entity if such sending arises from the Clerk's efforts to mail the Amendment 1 Notice Package at "least cost". Q. submit an itemized invoice to the Public Entity setting forth the fee to be paid by the Public Entity. R. remove the ballots from the ballot box after the time period for election contests has passed and preserve the ballots as election records pursuant to C.R.S. Â§1- 7-802. If requested by the Clerk, the Public Entity shall advise the Clerk when the time period for elec- tion contests has passed. In addition, the Public Entity shall immediately notify the Clerk of any elec- tion contest which is initiated and shall keep her apprised of the need to retain the election records for use in such a contest. S. Other: 2. DUTIES OF THE PUBLIC ENTITY The Public Entity shall perform the following duties, in connection with the election to be held on Nov. 8 , 1994: A. certify, at the earliest possible time and in any event prior to the fifty fifth day before the election, the ballot content (candidates, issues and questions) to the Clerk exactly as and in the order that it is to be printed on the ballot pages and sample ballots. B. proofread and approve the ballot content. C. publish all notices related to the Public Entity's election as are required by law. 3 D. prepare and provide to the Clerk at least twenty-five days before the election any voter information card or voter information letter which is required by law for the Public Entity's election and which pursuant to C.R.S. Â§1-5-206(4) is to be included with the Notice that is mailed by the Clerk pursuant to Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution. E. prepare and mail any other voter information cards, voter information letters or other notices which are required by law for the Public Entity's election. F. submit all deadline dates to the Clerk for review by the Clerk. G.' if requested by the Clerk, furnish precinct maps to be included in supplies for each election precinct. H. have the designated local election official (or one other person satisfactbry to the Clerk) attend the training session for election judges and assist the Clerk in the conduct of the training session as re- quested by the Clerk. I. if requested by the Clerk, provide person(s) to partic- ipate in the ballot counting procedures as accomplished by any electronic vote tabulating equipment used in the election. The Public Entity personnel shall partici- pate in various boards with personnel from the Clerk's office to ensure Public Entity participation in each of the electronic vote tabulating procedures that shall be used. 3. upon receipt of the invoice provided for in Section 1(Q), pay to the Clerk a fee which shall be an amount determined in accordance with the formula set forth on Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. K. notify the Clerk if it is a municipality which has pro- vided by ordinance or resolution that it will utilize the requirements and procedures of the Uniform Election Code of 1992 in lieu of the Colorado Municipal Election Code of 1965 with respect to this election and to forthwith provide a copy of said ordinance or reso- lution to the Clerk. L. designate a designated local election official who shall be the official contact person for the Clerk and 4 who shall perform such duties as are required by law including the obligation to receive and summarize written comments for and against proposals which are subject to the requirements of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution. The parties agree that the Clerk as chief coordinated election official shall have no duty or obligation to receive or summarize such comments. If the Clerk receives any such written comments, she shall promptly notify the Public Entity by telephone of this and the Public Entity shall promptly pick up the written comments to be included in its summaries. M. provide to the Clerk the notice required by Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution, including summaries of any written comments received for or against a proposal and including any summary prepared by petition representatives, at least twenty-five days before the election in camera ready form or in such other form as may be acceptable to the Clerk. The Public Entity shall be solely responsible for the preparation and content of the notice. N. by its signature herein, the Public Entity delegates to the Clerk its authority to determine the compensation to be paid to election judges and alternate judges. 0. mail to all landowners within Public Entity's district, other than those landowners to whom the Clerk has mailed notice under Section 1(P) above, the Amendment 1 Notice Package/Election Booklet between fifteen to twenty-five days before the election. 3. Absentee/Early Voting A. The Larimer County Clerk shall be responsible for conducting absentee/early voting (at its own expense) (such services to be included in the fee set forth in Section 2(J). B. The Larimer County Clerk shall procure all necessary supplies necessary for absentee/early voting (at its own expense) (such supplies to be included in the fee set forth in Section 2(J). C. The Larimer County Clerk shall procure absentee/early voting ballots X at its own expense ), ( such ballots to be included in the fee set forth in Section 2(J). 5 4. The designated local election official of the Public Entity is Vickie O'Connor, Town Clerk 5. The Clerk shall place upon the ballot the ballot content properly certified to her in accordance with law. The Public Entity shall be solely responsible for determining whether a ballot issue or question or candidate is properly placed before the voters. 6. All computations of time shall be governed by the provisions of C.R.S. Â§1-1-106. 7. In the event that the Public Entity's election for which this contract was entered into is cancelled prior to the date such election was schdduled to occur and notice of such cancellation is provided to the Clerk by the Public Entity, the Public Entity shall pay a fee calculated in accordance with the formula set forth in Exhibit "A" from which shall be deducted the Public Entity's prorata share of any ex- penses not incurred by the Clerk as a result of the cancel- lation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective upon the date first above written. LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO CLERK AND RECORDER Date: Myrna Rodenberger PUBLIC ENTITY: NAME OF PUBLIC ENTITY: Date: ATTEST: By: Name Title of Authorized Representative Name - - signing on behalf of Public Entity Title 6 EXHIBIT "A LARIMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER COORDINATED ELECTION COST FORMULA The election costs for coordinated elections will be prorated in the following manner: 1. The number of registered voters within each participating entity will be obtained from the Clerk & Recordefs Voter Registration file. 2. A value of one (1) is given to the first page of issues, candidates, and questions proposed by an individual entity (page factor). For any additional page of issues, candidates, and questions for that entity, an additional value of one tenth (.1 i will be added. 3. The number of registered voters is then multiplied by the "page factor" giving the total number of units for that entity. 4. The total election cost is divided by the total of units for all entities taking part in the election. This gives a per unit cost. 5. The number of units for the entity are multiplied by the unit cost giving the amount that entity owes. EXAMPLE TOTAL ELECTION COST I $105,000 COLUMN A B C D E REGISTERED PAGE NUMBER OF ENTITY ENTITY VOTERS PAGES FACTOR UNITS COST (A * C) (D * UNIT COST) STATE (STATE-WIDE ISSUE) 120,000 1 1 120,000 $27,873.02 COUNTY 120,000 1 1 120,000 $27,873.02 CITY OF FT. COLLINS 55,000 1 1 55,000 $12,775.14 CITY OF LOVELAND 25,000 3 1.2 30,000 $6,968.26 POUDRE Rl 75,000 2 1.1 82,500 $19,162.70 THOMPSON RN 34,000 2 1.1 37,400 $8,687.09 PARK R3 6,500 2 1.1 7,150 $1,660.77 TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS 452,050 (TOTAL OF COLUMN D) UNIT COST $0.2323 (ELECTION COST/NUMBER OF UNITS) page 1 In this example, the Thompson R2J School District is having a board election but no issue or question requiring an Amendment One notice thus alleviating them from the Amendment One mailing requirements. To calculate their share of the election costs, the cost for printing and postage to meet those requirements is subtracted from the total election cost. The calculation described on the. previous page is then performed giving their prorata cost. EXAMPLE TOTAL ELECTION COST $105,000 AMENDMENT ONE PRINTING & POSTAGE $39,000 REMAINDER $66,000 COLUMN A B C D E REGISTERED PAGE NUMBER OF ENTITY arrrFY VOTERS PAGES FACTOR UNITS COST (A * C) (D * UNIT COST) STATE (STATE-WIDE ISSUE) 120,000 1 1 120,000 $17,520.19 COUNTY 120,000 1 1 120,000 $17,520.19 CITY OF FT. COLLINS 55,000 1 1 55,000 $8,030.09 CITY OF LOVELAND 25,000 3 1.2 30,000 $4,380.05 POUDRE Rl 75,000 2 1.1 82,500 $12,045.13 THOMPSON RN.:f ...-i ..f .Â· .-: 34,0002.'* ~-1 Â·~Â·2Â·4-1---. {1.1.'~37,400.... 7 ..$5,460*.46 PARK FS Â· 6,500 2 1 .1 7,150 $1,043.91 TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS 452,050 (TOTAL OF COLUMN D) UNIT COST $0.1460 (REMAINDER/NUMBER OF UNITS) Thompson R2J would now owe $5,460.46. This figure would be subtracted from the total election cost and the calculation on page one would be performed again minus Thompson R2J's entry to arrive at the other entities' costs. 1 page 2 ....... PLEASE REFER TO THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM Mail to: TOWN OF ESTES PARK NO. 00 Food Tax Refund Program P. O. Box 1200 1995 Application <- 4a *CW~v~ - - Estes Park, CO 80517 Attn: Town Clerk's Office Please Note Your Application For Information or Assistance Call 586-5331, x 3102 Number for Reference LAST NAME FIRST & MIDDLE INITIAL YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER STREETAODRESS APT. P. O. Box # SPOUSE'S FIRST NAME & MIDDLE CITY STATE ZIP CODE DATE PHONE SPOUSE'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER THIS RETURN MUST BE FILED BY MARCH 31, 1995, IN ORDER TO RECEIVE A REFUND Town Use Only PART 1 List other addresses in which you resided in 1994, including terms PART 2 Eligible Family Members (include yourself) of occupancy, most current first. Residency must be verified with current picture ID. Name Social Security No. No. Family Members Address Period A. B. to C. to 0. Income to E. to F. to G. Total No. of Boxes Checked on Lines A through G. PART 3 Residency Length a. Wages, Salaries, Tips, etc. a. b. Interest Income, Dividends, etc. b. c. Social Security Income C. d. Pensions, V.A. Benefits d. Amount of Refund e. A.F.O.C. and Foot Stamp Benefits, Other Social Services Income e. F. Gifts. Grants, Scholarships, Tuition, etc. f. g. Other Income (explain) g h. Total Family Income (add Lines 3a through 3g) 11. PART 4 Authorization a. Amount of Tax Refund (see table on reverse side) a. b. Did you or any members of the family file a Federal Income Tax Return for 1994? b. yes no If you checked YES to above, you MUST include a copy of the return(s) with this application. If you checked NO to above, you MUST attach copy of income sources for 1994 to substantiate Part 3. PART 5 a. A family where at least one of the members is a child under the age of eighteen. a. yes no b. A family where at least one of the members is disabled. b. yes no c. A family where at least one of the members is over the age of sixty-five. c. -yes -no d. An individual who is disabled. d. yes no e. An individual over the age of sixty-five. e. yes no "Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return and to the best of my knowledge, and belief it is true, correct and complete." Your Signature(s) Date Please Print ..4 TOWN OF ESTES PARK LOW-INCOME RESIDENT FOOD TAX REFUND PROGRAM (Refund of 1994 Tax) The Estes Park Town Board has approved a new program to refund estimated payments of local food tax to the following low-income residents: families with children, elderly; and disabled. The Town's previous general property tax refund program has been discontinued. This decision was based upon a review ' of the results and effectiveness of the program in the context of budget priorities and whether it was meeting community goals. The previous program was designed to refund property tax to all low-income residents. Some individuals who received payments under the discontinued program may not qualify for the new program. Able-bodied singles under age 65 do not qualify for tax refunds under the new program. The new Food Tax Refund Program has been designed to make Estes Park's taxation structure more equitable for family, disabled, and elderly low-income residents by refunding their estimated expenditures for local sales taxes on purchases of food. To qualify for the new program, you must have lived within the boundaries of the EVRPD in Larimer County during 1994, be a resident at the time of application, have an income under the low-income guidelines, and be in one of the following categories: A family where at least one of the members is a child under the age of eighteen. A family where at least one of the members is disabled. A family where at least one of the members is over the age of sixty-five. An individual who is disabled. An individual over the age of sixty-five. Proof of eligibility must be presented. (This includes proof of residency, copies of Federal or State tax returns, proof of disability, and/or other information depending upon specific circumstances.) Applications for food tax refunds will be accepted between January 1, 1995, and March 31, 1995. Depending upon family size, the maximum income you may have to qualify for a food tax refund is as follows: FOOD TAX REFUND Income Guidelines Family Members 1 2 3 4 5 $0 - $15,450 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $15,451 - $17,700 $150 $200 $250 $300 $17,701 - $19,900 $200 $250 $300 $19,901 - $22,100 $250 $300 $22,101 - $23,850 $300 For additional information, please call 586-5331, x 3102. ..... .UAL 31 z . 24 12* -- % . .1 -t , 1 *1Â· -iÂ·.5 -Â·Â·Â· If /'-/A'l \1 1 i .'.6.1 - - t, 141 - Li<:Pi~- .:-4 4. *4>* Â· 1-0 41:,.1.-04 0 /_3I . Â· r f 12 4 0, 1/1.41 9:N/ 4Â¥ 3-1Â¥\1,-Iv: I li :1 . 0 1. 41: \, 4 . .. ' -4.. . 9- : -' .'. I .f/->t , 'c.Â· LU - AA 1 -- I ! . 4. 11/7232 . -' r 9 9- ... t L 7---1~~U.VA. Â· Â· -945~-t=Â· t.. . -- ' 11 -.I i.- t. 1 4 : 2, rv. f . / 10 : 155 . ... 7/' , AY,FAAPA: 26 1-. . . .?< ~ >~Ni / ~- Â·~~0- *W- or :iffh# 7 1 2 ,Â· . Â·, L y,g.Â· 09242-1 i> j . 1Â£ i. .- 1 . râ€¢ 4 1-4 ' 1'. 1 . 4,9 11 . U .- L -- . tn/-1 . 1 . . .. i 1 -'WN:â‚¬ -' h .. $ V r . -%-1- ht 1.. ti 1 .. . 3 4:Â·1 Â· S#-r) t>/I~~ 42-Al~~~~~~tiÂ· ac-IiÂ·.i *f/! le ..i t...... 9 4 - 94._ -'. pe - '40.-IL-r,cr.- 0-..4 : X.'. . .f ./A .4. .-1- ' ... t Â· : . 4. UPM,:SP C .- I . ....... , t. l:. . . 1- 1 ....0, i - 2:Â·*%99(i / -7 41 -:.3?f ':7.?fII.,ph.- :i. 1.:-./:.*,49. .., 1 / 3 0 . .r\1N -f,614:*L-a..#57c-. ,. 32 ; .:* .....ru U 1 -- i T J 1. 4141. f -?/ 0 'fIL.:.. i:?j:M t~fÂ»1 59 4.rf" f , ... _ V, - iT $ 13*. 414 1 .. . . 1 6 Ljoj .I-f. :7 1 i.. .. 41; Â·:. :. J I. 11!i .!11 31Â· : i i -48. I ' i - V â€¢. 09<lf/4 2: . . CÂ¥ . i .4. . 4 -:-.1 . < . :. . t,. - - 91 ~<<IzE (blli--G~â€¢~,]SL,2 ..... . 1.I/:*. *-1 * . Li I '. 1 -Â· . ... .11 1 .r- . . *4 6 . â€¢.i' - w ~ ~ : i f ~ f-p~ ;a ~ -0. .. 11; '3% ; a h'D-4 3~ - 41% I. .. . .. 6.. 'SÂ¥. 4 /2 2 24 5 4 : 1.1 &141 ff i : Cjft 11 >16 21 .. ... ' Id.. R Ir 5* * 5.If . 441 4. I :i :. It , f... . 1. P. 7,6/ - -. . I \4 I $. , . . 4 - .. . -J-'* U . .4 .. Z. r,021-Al :1 JAJAffÂ· 7 4...3./7.' X-5, C : ..90.4.... , - 1. 1 I.k~'19.. 2 C 111 :1 i I l < 1 't: h , 1 :,1,0. / 23 r ~; ~'; :A 61 -3#1-:D f/JÂ¥ 1.'t;-6 13.j, 7. iii - i /Â«C Â· ' i :i i <SE i 'f :. .75 'f 1 ~j-~..4 . 1 ; A <1 !- . , 6-1 . 5 0 .4224. >9/ fr 1, l z 14/ :*.~51- j i 11 , 1 p.Fil .~. : .5, D Â·Â·Â· . ./#.... . 1 1 IDINISICI XEVd CINV NOILVE[HOE[H ASTIVA SHISH ZILL 20 SHIEVCINAOE ' m f & i j 1 91 ?Bl f a, SS; & m 8 a g b & 0, m Z in LU 01> , 1- LU co m . - 0 1- r (D z~ ~Sm BJ 0-5 04 Â£ *2 2 i= 3 # 4E3 f 0 0 4 h .,4. % 9 N co LO C O O1-1- el 1 32 >-2 2 iebruary 100,869 99,604 -1.25% 99,986 0.38% 101,731 1.75% 116,892 14.90% 146,106 24.99% . 143,084 -2.07% 178,663 24.87% 105,266 125,236 18.97% 119,558 -4.53% 136,169 13.89% 134,666 -1.10% 170,178 26.37% 169,924 -0.15% 196,104 15.41% 340,726 349,396 2.54% 319,232 -8.63% 406,075 27.20% 430,401 5.99% 470,100 9.22% 489,638 4.16% 535,491 9.36% VIONTH 1987 1988 %Change 1989 %Change 1990 % 1991 %Change 1992 0 1993 % 1994 % january 91,003 101,624 11.67% 101,366 -0.25% 105,843 4.42% 128,036 20.97% 141,270 10.34% 145,635 3.09% 160,651 VIarch 117,111 131,230 12.06% 142,537 8.62% 152,776 7.18% 157,335 2.98% 180,591 14.78% 195,477 8.24% 218,480 11.77% 177,633 197,115 10.97% 253,527 28.62% 211,884 -16.43% 237,388 12.04% 258,861 9.05% 270,722 4.58% 302,968 11.91% 298'269' L 188'*88'E 080'802'8 696'*SE'E 801'80 l'E 088' 1 18'8 189'629'8 406,911 431,901 6.14% 450,432 4.29% 487,255 8.18% 518,745 6.46% 565,744 9.06% 592,147 4.67% %09'8 889'929 %88.Ol 188'089 %08'E- 988' Le/ %80'9 otâ‚¬'009 0/ozvo OZZ' tz* %1799 /99'694 164'Wk Jequteldes %*Â£ 04 zoo'*EZ %880 OZE'99 L %61*EL 128'491 %82'OK 9 L9'St L %9Â£'6 LIL'ZEL %890 0L8'081 666'6 L L JaqUIeAOA %0Â£'8- 809'818 %29.4 1 988'688 %22 . 906'803 % LS.Z- 098'008 %89* Â£ 19'908 %299 1 ED'96 L 996'69 L JeqU,808C % .EL %/6/ %98*OL %91.8 %88'9 %16'9 %622 90*'929 %93.. 668' L69 0/088.98 169'299 %88'9 900'Est %Oct Lt,8'88* %28'8 8,8'90, 9 I.L'E68 :sn6nK %69â‚¬l 09Â£'EZZ %08'91 96Â£'Otz %88.8 Â£*8'802 %24*6 99008 %960 â‚¬*828 & O/ben L 860'28 L L*9'891 Jeq010C PARK 686 1 'sea Â·p,oe, sligo eoueisla Buol :ei 60!inbl unoo eweidns XI pele,eues 10 901'800'E from Prev. Year 0